Select "Add New Message" to post a message.
Printable View
Select "Add New Message" to post a message.
Nobody across the whole board especially interested in Thailand has any views on safe sex in Thailand. What does it mean?
1. Sex in Thailand is so safe that nobody is worried?
or
2. People are so crazy about Thai pussies that nobody is worried about safety.
or
3. All people enjoying sex in Thailand knows what to do while in Thailand.
I think 3 is the correct answer.
Hey Guys
Chai Thung dee kwa na.
.....Just in case some sucker, like me, forget to 'wear' something 'cause "- that girl was so beautifull and she told me I was the first farang she ever met"-.....
I hope anyone can find the follows informations useful.
(I wrote something similar in a precedent post....).anyway always good to remember :
Most common venereal disease in Thailand are :
N.S.U. (Non Specifical Disease).
In the 70 % of the case NSU is caused by a bacterial called Clamydia Thracomatis.This bacterial seems to be the N'1 mother****** around Thailand....
Problem is that Clamydia's molecular structure(DNA) is similar to a Virus, that's mean one time you get it you may produce antibodies.This bacterial is very,very smart.You might get it without symptoms. Most of the time NSU reveals oneself with itching and a small white drop in the morning before the first [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url].
Few times , no drop, no nothing.
If you think you catch something like this I suggest :
1) If you stay in your country ask for an urethral tampon and (very important) for an IGG & IGM research (by blood) both for Clamydia.IGG is antibody for old infections (if you have had it) IGM is for current infection (if you have it now).
2)If you stay in Thailand,Pattaya rule N' 1 : don't go ABSOLUTELY to small clinics . Most of them are runned by liars paramedicals who don't know nothing , they just want to sell as much drugs they can....
In Thailand they can't scan Clamydia but they can tell you if you got an NSU.Best place to go in Pattaya is Bangkok Pattaya Hospytal on Sukhumvit Road Km. 143, Naklua Banglamung area.
tel. 038 / 427777.
They will send your test to the Laboratory test of Chonburi Medical Center (RIA) wich is the only one able to do it.
You can go straight to Chonburi as well : Chonburi Medical Center
13/32 Wachiraprakarn Road, Bangplasoy. tel. 038/792357-60.
3)If you don't want to go to any doctor 'cause you don't trust no-one, my suggestion is to take : ERYTHROMICIN, 500 mg. every 8 hours for 7 - 10 days or RULID 300 mg. 2 tbl.a day for 7 - 10 days or Zythromax 1 gramm every 3 days......(with me Erythromicin worked..).All of these ant. are from Macrolides family that seems to be the best to erase NSU.Don't use Doxiciline...It doesn't work, trust me.
Please do not underestimate this...Recent studies have proved relations between heart stroke and Clamydia.
As I said in my precedent post you're not gonna die but better open an eye....
Despite this, still believe Thailand and Pattaya are the best place in the world.... peace.
..sorry N.S.U. is for Non Specifical Urethritis......instead Non Specifical Disease.... M.
Skinless,
first of all, let me tell you that,reading the board, I agree with your point of view about Thai girls most of the time.(..you can consider this as a compliment ...done by a 'true thaigirls veteran' like me..he,he..)
About 'souvenirs', don't worry I get it many times in the past, it can happens, we are not cold machines.
Getting gonorea/clamydia is very normal in Pattaya as BKK.
That's why if you go to some clinic there , they're gonna give you a single injection wich should erase gonhorrea and a 3 to 5 days course of tablets in case you get NSU as well.
So if you get both of 'souvenirs' my suggestion is to use :
Trobicin inj. 2 grams each dosage for 2 days (it gonna kill nesseirea gonhorrea) and erythromicin tbl. 250 mg. every 6 hours,
for at least 7 days (about clamydia).
This program will erase Gonhorrea and NSU as well .
Where to buy this ?
In pattaya there's a pharmacy in soi 17 (I think is 17..) coming from Marine Plaza, after Jack Holt French beauty salon , must be the first street on the right..I guess soi 17. The Pharmacy is called
CHULA , you can't miss it, and it is almost in front of the big open market place. It is the only pharmacy having Trobicin inj. 2 grams from Upjohn Pharmacia, USA. I think this drug is the best to treat gonhorrea, better than Rocephin. Erithromicin (Erythrocin) you can buy anywhere , Boots 1th floor Royal garden as well.
If you stay in BKK, go to the biggest pharmacy in PatPong, the one after Kings Corner, they should have anything.
It's very funny.....Last time I was in pattaya I was talking with a dear friend of mine from Germany, and we were thinking that 15 years ago most of the time we talked just about wich girls was better than...etc.,etc., now most of the time we talk about wich kind of antibiotics is better than......
Skinless,
I'm not an expert, as I told you I'm just a veteran about it....
I've just reported what has worked with me and with few friends of mine.....
Of course the best way to treat these kind of NSU should be find out first the responsable bacterial and then start with proper antibiotic .So, you should find a good laboratory test first , then you will see wich kind of antibiotic is sensitive or not.....
If you go to the Hospytal and you ask for a doctor they will try to steal you as much money they can.....(they will start to check your pressure..!!!??? is'n it ?).
Most of the pharmacies in pattaya got the right stuff.It's the same stuff you gonna find in the hospytal.
About using wrong antibiotics, I'm totally agree with you ...Might be very dangerous 'cause you will grow resistant bacterials....
But..trust me ,my friend, Macrolides antibiotics are N° 1 to treat NSU.
Anyway about laboratory test centers, keep on consideration those I mentioned before....If you know some better places , please let me know.
PS/... something funny...
I guess it did happens to you too........
...going to an hospytal like Pattaya Memorial or Bangkok Pattaya, waiting in a queue at the hospital reception , then when your turn comes a very nice and gentle girl receptionist ask you in front of everybodies :
" Hello Mister, what's your problem today ?"....Everybody in the queue are able to hear anything, so can you immagine if you go there for gonhorrea how the situation could be ' funny' one time you gonna answer her .. : "- Yes I'm here 'cause I got some dirty spoil going out of my dick...and I feel burn when I [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url]...."-
....But maybe this is one of the amazing things we can find only in Thailand and that's why we like it as well....
Hello everyone,
Regarding this topic I too have had a painful experience. I was in Pattaya and unfortunately listened to the ladies in the Pharmacy who sold me a bunch of antibiotics that of course didn't work. Fortunately I met someone who told be about Doctor Samnuek's small clinic on central road. Don't know the exact address but it is only a few minutes on a songtaew from second road. He looked at the puss in a microscope told me it was Gonorrhea and gave me a shot. After that he gave me two kinds of pills to take for a few days, and then I was fine. This cost me about 2000 if I remember correctly. Despite that painful experience I have been foolish enough to have several girls without protection. Nothing has ever happened to me again though. I think it is just a question of how well you can pick them.
Have fun everyone, and take care of yourselves!
to those it might interest, this is a letter published recently in the british medical journal. i do not know that journal, nor am i familiar with the research told by mr. mohammed ali al-bayati. i find that the way he tells his story is interesting though.
enjoy the reading.
seydlitz
===================================
hiv does not cause aids
30 january 2002
to the editor:
the aids establishments have spent the last twenty years focusing on the hiv and not on the real causes of aids. the correct approach for investigating the cause(s) of a disease is by evaluating all medical evidence that considers infectious, chemical, nutritional, and metabolic factors. as a pathologist and a toxicologist, i evaluated the published literature on the
worldwide aids epidemic and found that hiv does not cause aids. in my book “get all the facts: hiv does not cause aids”, i described the multifactorial causes of aids in the world and explained the pathogenesis of aids in different risk groups [mohammed ali al-bayati, 'get all the facts: hiv does not cause aids' toxi-health international, dixon ca 1999, 183 pages isbn
0-9673536-0-2].
my findings include:
1) the hiv-hypothesis is not supported. hiv is a harmless virus in both the in vivo and the in vitro settings.
2) aids in drug users and homosexuals in the u.s. and europe is actually caused by the heavy ancillary use of glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive agents to medically treat the wide range of chronic serious illnesses of the respiratory system, gastrointestinal system, and other organs, malnutrition, release of endogenous cortisol, and opportunistic infections in these persons. the appearance of "aids" in the u.s. and europe has coincided with the approval of glucocorticoid aerosoll use in 1976, the introduction of crack cocaine, the use of heroin by inhalation, and the use of alkyl nitrites by homosexuals to enhance sexual activities.
3) aids in hemophiliacs is related to the use of corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents to prevent the development of antibodies for factors viii and ix and to treat other chronic illnesses such as joint disease.
4) aids in people receiving blood and/or tissue is related to the use of glucocorticoids to prevent reactions of transfusion and tissue rejection, and to treat other illnesses.
5) aids in infants and children is caused by their exposure to drugs and corticosteroids in utero and their exposure to corticosteroids used after birth to treat their chronic illnesses.
6) aids in africa is caused by malnutrition, release of endogenous cortisol, and opportunistic diseases. atrophy in the lymphoid tissue in people suffering from malnutrition has been known since 1925. malnutrition causes severe atrophy in the thymus and lymphoid organs and impairs the function of the t cells. these changes are reversible by feeding. the size of the thymus in malnourished children increased from 20% of normal to 107% of normal, following nine weeks of feeding.
7) kaposi's sarcoma (ks) and lymphoma are induced by the use of steroids and drugs, and the release of endogenous cortisol. they are not caused by a slow virus. ks is reversible upon the termination of treatment with immunosuppressive agents prior to metastasis.
8) the medications currently used to treat patients with aids, such as azt, protease inhibitors, and glucocorticoids, are highly toxic. they can even cause aids in asymptomatic patients, and make the disease worse in patients with aids. these drugs do not have any therapeutic value, and their use must be discontinued immediately.
9) damage to the immune system is rapidly reversible after removal of the true insulting agent or treatment of the true causes. for example. a) the cd4+ t cells of 1075 hiv+ pregnant women increased from 426/ul to 596/ul in six months by giving these women a balanced diet. this also improved the outcome of their pregnancy; and b) the reduction in cd4+ t cells in hiv homosexuals was also reversed by the cessation of treatment with glucocorticoids.
my findings have been reviewed and supported by scientists and physicians.
mohammed ali al-bayati,
president, toxi-health international
toxi-health international, 150 bloom dr., dixon, ca 95620
send response to journal:
re: hiv does not cause aids
email mohammed ali al-bayati:
maalbayati@toxi-health.com
below are the links to some of these articles and
reviews:http://www.toxi-health.com; http://www.mercola.com/20
01/jul/11/aids2.htm; http://www.rethinkingaids.com/archive/2001/index.htm;
www.aliveandwell.org/index.php?page=study
Well, I can say that his theory on Kaposi's sarcoma, for one, doesn't exactly hold up. There are several studies, for example, about increased rates of Kaposi's in South Africa, where steroids and drugs are not exactly available.
I'd have to spend time looking at the others, but frankly I don't see why to bother, as, according to his vita, he's first and foremost trained as a veterinarian, most of his work is about environmental toxicology and none of it about infectious disease, and pretty well nothing that he states as "fact" in his letter is anything he's done actual research on. How is this guy possibly expert enough to make the claims he does?
Joe_zop, skinless,
I agree that Mr. Mohammed Ali Al-Bayati's views are somewhat rudimentary and can be questioned on many accounts. This is why I was careful to put some distance between myself and his views.
I found that the way he went through the issue was provocative, and as such worthy of posting in here. And also the fact that his letter was published in a British journal that is rather on the other side of the controversy.
And, Skinless, you might say that I am playing with words again, but I do agree that HIV and AIDS are real. There would be no issue if they weren't. But the point is that I suspect that they have been invented. They were created, out of a still-to-be-isolated virus and a list of non-specific diseases. And the causality between the two was not established.
Now that we have the concept of HIV/AIDS with us, the issue is how to deal with it. And that is where we disagree.
now this is just me...
but I deal with it with condoms. ;) at 28, I want at least another 40 good years of having fun instead of rotting away at say 31 or 32.
packem and rippem.
:)
Joe_zop:
about statistics in South Africa.
We should keep in mind that the Republic of South Africa is a country that has gone trhough a lot of trouble in the last 30 years. It offers the contrast of first-world modernity with middle age dark Africa.
Statistics from the RSA can be very misleading. For example: in several districts, the population is seen to decrease. That is the number of deaths outnumber the number of births. Terrible fact of a country ravaged by AIDS ?
Well, maybe not. Until recently, in several parts of the country, the South African civil service was not much concerned about the black population. Many births and deaths were unreported in rural areas. But now, they are recording deaths of people who were never born, according to their registers.
And quite possibly people who died a while back as well, in an effort to catch up with the late paperwork.
All that can have a disruptive effect on statistics. I am not aware of the KS studies you mention, but it might be that the increase you mention is a mere consequence of a better classification of statistcal events in a country that does not have all the tools that western countries have.
One thing I noticed in Thailand in 2001 was how many farangs there looked downright Unhealthy.
Fat White Zombies shuffling up/down Sukhumvit Rd.
Take a look some time and see if you agree.
Great place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there.
Seydlitz, agreed that South Africa is not necessarily a place where statistics are reliable. It's been months since I read the study, but as I recall the researcher was looking at the rates both within a narrow and larger geographical context, using one smaller locale and the country as a whole. I don't remember enough of his methodology to make a judgement about the stats. I do know that any number of sources (while carefully making the distinction between HIV-1 and HIV-2) call Kaposi's "endemic" to East Africa, and are working to identify the method in which it is transmitted, and the very existence of these efforts, which indicate at least a high enough level of Kaposi's to be at least somewhat significant, in and of themselves seem absolutely counter to the theory presented by Al-Bayati that it is caused by immunosuppressive drugs and steroids, which are just not all that present in the region.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by MondaysChilde
[i]One thing I noticed in Thailand in 2001 was how many farangs there looked downright Unhealthy.
Fat White Zombies shuffling up/down Sukhumvit Rd.
Take a look some time and see if you agree.
Great place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there. [/i][/QUOTE]
I have lived in the middle of the action on Sukhumvit for 18 months. It's great fun. But I have have never gotten used to the "Fat White Zombies" you mentioned. "Fat White Zombies" wallets, combined with their sex drive, makes them "desirable" among the *****s. Just imagine one of those guys pumping away on some 20 year-old girl, his fat floppy stomach slapping away, driven by his pimply ass. Disgusting.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kris
[i]...I think it is just a question of how well you can pick them.
[/i][/QUOTE]
You've GOT to be kidding! Unless your "pick them" process involves isolating them for 3 months before checking their blood and pussy for a variety of STDs, you are praticing very risky behavior. To think otherwise is moronic.
someone thai made condoms are not very reliable.and
failure rate is much higher ..so he told me to buy condoms inmy country and take them to Thailand.
is this true?
The statistic I've seen repeated in various places is that Thai condoms have an 11% failure rate, but I've been unable to track down the original source, so it's hard to tell whether that's an accurate number or if someone just threw that percentage out and everyone keeps repeating it.
But given that I keep hearing the same thing over and over about Thai condoms from a variety of places, I just play it safe and make sure I've got a good supply from home, where I know from experience what I'm getting. Why risk it?
Where can I buy viagra in Bangkok, and how much do they cost ? Is it true you can buy them on the streets, laced with illegal narcotics ? (I wanna stay well away from that sort of rubbish !)
You can buy them at most pharmacies, and they run about 500 baht each. You can get better prices by buying more.
Thanks ! Is there any trouble getting viagra through customs ? (I'm not talking about large quantities, obviously, just a few.)
Dufus, LOL, how true. Probably sporting a profusion of welts, whiteheads, rope burns and assorted skin rashes from the heat...
Since this is the Safe Sex section, I gotta tell ya, any strategy in a 3rd-world or even second-world country (like Thailand) HAS to include thinking about who your sweet little partner just bonked...
anyone for a tuktuk driver's sloppy seconds?
That's why I will always stay high-end (Poseidon, etc.).
Re VIAGRA - - I got what I think was a bad batch of viagra from a sukm. Rd. pharmacy near Nana Entertainment Plaza.
It made my eyes red and sting a bit, and did not have much effect otherwise (although my evening takeout took care of that!)
FIND AN EXPAT WHO KNOWS WHERE TO GO. Phoney drugs are big business in SE Asia.
As for getting them back to your country - why try? You may get hassled at the gate and wind up spending 6 hours in the holding tank at Don Muang Airport while your plane leaves w/o you.
I had the (probably) typical experience of running out of my meager supply of American brand condoms way too soon. I decided to try the local pharmacist who said this Japanese brand sells best. I tried them (forgot name) and realized for two nights that my wood would go limp about two or three minutes after I put the condom on. First, I thought it was the girl of course! But it happened with two girls in a row, and one girl three times as soon as I started the deed! This sure made me sympathize with impotance sufferers! But fortunately for me the problem was the condoms. I shopped around and found the Thai durex brand comes in three thickness, including a "featherlite" variety in the gold box. These had very much the feel of the condoms I brought, and in retrospect, the Japenese brand were like steel casings.
Also, I mean to try Viagra on my next trip to LOS since I was absolutely maxed out on two girls. Although I can get wood more than twice per day, I find it nearly impossible to finish...so what exactly does Viagra do for the average bloke. Does it just help you get wood or pop off as well?
Tony
re your snake, ha ha!
Viagra justs get you up quick and VERY hard! It does not help you "pop off" just encourages you to try!
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Freeler
[i]Joe,
If it was the clap, make sure to get another test in 4-6 months or so. but I guess the doctor told you...
No I never had it, but similar symptoms can show up in fungal infections, eg the wounds on the skin that won't heel... My doctor was very nervous about it and had me re-checked -bloodtest- after half a year. [/i][/QUOTE]
Yup, absolutely good advice. I've every intention of getting a full workup once I get home in any event. The doctor here said what he found was non-specific -- some kind of infection, nothing raising a particular flag, so he prescribed doxy which banged the symptoms away pretty quickly. I'm well aware that STDs can hide in your system for a long time before they come back out, and I'll be having a complete bloodwork done when I get home.
As far as the fungal, again, yes, I know there are some nasties here, and originally I wasn't sure whether it was a dose or something from some street food that wasn't quite cooked properly. Since I'm not a resident I know there are all kinds of bacteria, both goodand bad, other folks here have in their system that I lack.
I think your advice holds for travel in general -- any time you get sick overseas, STD or not, it's not a bad idea for follow up after a few months.
do thai girls have health cards like they do in Mexico? Where can i find these girls in Thailand? I dont mind paying a little more.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by skinless
[i]http://www.ashastd.org/stdfaqs/syphilis.html
I post this as it says oral sex can give it to you. When I got my own souvenir, I did some extensive research. Syphiliis is rampant in SE Asia and chlamydia comes with the TG package.
Talks of them getting tested etc is bs. They are uneducated and unlike Mexico, there is nothing like a feminist network to insist on condoms etc. They most likely regard STDs as part of the job. I would imagine the ladies doing 10 BJs a day are not too picky, something like guys washing cars. Also, Joe, you were drinking a lot so your mind was probably not at 100%.
Please inform us where you think you got it. That is more important to me than a blow by bj account in some sordid bj bar or other.
Please everyone remember that the ladies we bonk are societal rejects with little medical experience. The doctors they go to are most likely under paid quacks or greedy guys who, faced with their STDs every day of the week, will tell them to "breathe out on the way up", have a wash now and again and don't take it too much in the butt. And who are told not to fuck around if the sores and puss are too obvious.
Joe I salute you for admititng you stoped a bullet. Please tell us where, when and how. Save the sex as we can do that ourselves if we have money. [/i][/QUOTE]
Well, I wish I could blame it on drinking, or the combo of that and jet lag, but it was actually from engaging in moderately risky behavior -- i.e. unprotected mutual oral. Yes, I know it's not completely safe, and Freeler's comments regarding the way to go are something I mostly agree with (except that using condoms with N-11 has actually been shown to increase the risk for women, especially sex workers, as it irritates membranes -- there appears to be a very minimal difference between safety with or without it as long as condoms are used) but to me at some point you also make choices about the degree of risk you take versus the degree of enjoyment you desire. If I was smart and safe, I'd not be boinking at all, of course, and certainly would not do anal, even protected, etc. But I do a visual check for sores or irritation both around mouth and genitals, and refrain if I'm the least bit concerned, and I use condoms and lube for all penetration.
My best guess, Skinless, is that I contracted my dose from the worker from the Kangaroo Bar who I took for the night, as the odds are higher there as I both gave and received unprotected oral. I know you can get it only from bbbj, but the odds on that are lower, so I'd bet it was on me giving rather than receiving. For what it's worth, I plan on looking up this TG when I go back and offering to get her checked out, but we all know the likelihood that will make any difference is minimal. Still, it's what I'd do at home, so I'll do it here as well.
And to finish on the follow-up -- I saw an excellent foreign-educated doctor who spoke fluent English at Chiang Mai's Ram Hospital. My symptoms are completely gone, but I'm naturally finishing all the given medicine, going to do a follow-up with him, and will do another at home. While I'm willing to entertain a degree of risk, I'm also committed to cleaning up any mess I make.
(And I may or may not save the sex for other threads :-) though right now I'm saving a bit as I've got a gem.)
I'll put 100-1 on you giving.
guys,
i hope you all will accept this in the spirit in which it is intended, which is to be helpful.
i have been following this std discussion, and i applaud joe_zop and skinless for their honest and forthright discussion of their own experiences with stds contracted in thailand. it is not an easy subject for many, but should be handled without judgment. we are talking about germs here, and there should be no stigma in facing the problem.
that said, i have to point out the vast array of misinformation that has been posted so far. i won't point fingers, or quote posts, and i mean no disrespect to those who are misinformed, but some light has to be shed here.
good washing is effective in preventing many diseases, and can not hurt, though i disagree with placing anything inside your urethra which would cause irritation (soap). irritated tissue is an open door to bacteria, and viruses. and just how well can you wash your dick in the nasty hongnam at star of light? by the time you get back to your hotel shower, it won't help much. taking a [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] right after intercourse may wash some bacteria out, and prevent infection some of the time. if your [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord901][CodeWord901][/url] gets too frisky, and leaves toothmarks and abrasions, you are more susceptible to infection until it is healed.
condoms are the best we've got for prevention, and each of us has to decide when and where we will use them, based on how much risk we can tolerate.
let this be a starting point, not the definitive list of stds and their effects. there is a wealth of info on the net, and anyone who has multiple sex partners, condoms or not, should take the time to become informed.
i will resist the temptation to write about the medical details of each, but here is a good link which is easy to understand:
http://www.unspeakable.com/facts/facts.jsp
take the time to read it, and decide for yourself the level of risk you are prepared to take in your travels. it is a conservative page, and will advocate 100% condom use, but it has accurate info. i have my own line in the sand, and you should be prepared to draw yours.
important: as a number of people have pointed out, especially in thailand, there is no reason to fear going to a doctor, if you have any doubts about your health. go, and go back until you are sure you are ok. medical training is quite good in thailand, and if you are in bkk or chiang mai, you have a bunch of choices where english is spoken. doctors here are not judgmental, and will treat you cheerfully, and pleasantly. even though it is by far the most expensive in thailand, bumrungrad is absolutely cheap by western standards, and is world-class, with pampered service almost unknown in hmo-land.
pay attention to the idea that there is a period during which you may be infected, but have no symptoms. during that time, tests may be negative, and you may infect others. if the little head gets the best of the big one, and you do something you know is unsafe, follow up multiple times.
one last recommendation: there are specific vaccines available for hepatitis a and b. hep b is considered an std, while hep a is associated with fecal contamination of food. see your doctor, and get both, if possible (the shots, i mean). i have never been seriously ill from food in thailand, and i can deal with the occasional traveller's trots. hepatitis a, on the other hand, is a nasty way to end your vacation. hepatitis b is a killer, and easily transmitted by body fluids during sex. vaccination can prevent both, and leave you with only about 6-8 other stds to worry about :)
i'm not dogmatic about what you should or shouldn't do, what precautions to take, or what risk you can live with. being informed, though, is the only way to make your own decisions.
i hope this is seen as useful.
wildman
[quote]originally posted by skinless
[i]mojo: they are terrible odds you are giving. what gives?
joe: thanks for your report and be careful. i did phone up the bb one and tell her my news and i know by reading her emails she got cleaned up. the kangaroo lady will deny it of course. please excuse my approach as i do not want syphilis:
did you get oral or genital symptoms?
are you cleaned up already?
are you drinking lots of water?
please keep us informed on this as it is very important. we are the only two who ever admitted here to being purple hearts. you saluted me. i salute you.
skinless (audie murphy) [/i][/quote]
well, you're likely right mojo, but it's rather irrelevant from my perspective, since i'm a fan of both giving and receiving (umm, though of pleasure, not diseases.) that's one of my lines in the sand, and while, as i mentioned, i try to minimize risk through inspection in that regard, i'm well aware of the inexactness and risk of that approach, especially given that i've just had an object lesson. that said, this is the first dose i've had in probably three hundred partners over the years.
wildman, i stand convicted of posting an incorrect assumption -- and believe me i have absolutely no problem being corrected, so please point out any other place i've passed along something incorrect, as this forum is only as good as the valuable info posted on it. based on symptoms from the link you posted it appears pretty clear that what i had was chlamydia rather than syphillis. (and thanks for that link, btw -- i actually spent a fair amount of time searching for a symptom chart for male symptoms of chlamydia, as that was one of the things i suspected and simply couldn't find them. the joys of my lousy los dialup connection, which seems a bit less cranky today.) despite what the particular posted site claims, which is that chlamydia is transmitted via unprotected intercourse and can be prevented by condom use, in my case there absolutely was protection at all times during intercourse (and no condom tearing or breakage either, as i checked.) other sites also cite fluid exchange through the mouth as a transmission method, which is pretty clearly what happened in this case. i knew that was also the case with syph, which is why i went there as a solution when my chlamydia searches came up empty.
i apologize to all for the incorrect assumption -- recall that i said my doctor was somewhat vague, said it could be syph, was definitely an std, and prescribed doxy, which i see by the site is the treatment called for by chlamydia. i did [i]not[/i] receive any kind of penicillin which would be the treatment for syph and others.
washing is, in fact, something the cdc recommends as a way of killing surface germs and generally reducing risks, but i agree with wildman that anything likely to irritate tissue is completely counterproductive.
now for what it's worth, i've had the complete sequence of all hep vaccines, as well as yellow fever, tetanus, etc. pretty much any kind of traveller's vaccination you can get, i've had in the past few years, as i've travelled to a number of third-world places, and all my vaccines current. i'm with you, wildman -- frankly i'm far more worried about hepatitus, especially some of the new and nasty strains than syph or some of the others. hep and hiv are the two nasties that i worry about most, as you can cure or at least live with the others.
i apologize to anyone who finds this all too clinical, but i'm hoping people can learn from my experience. it happened, i'm a big boy and knew it was part of the equation, and by posting this stuff here perhaps i can make a little lemonade out of the lemon. so, to answer your questions, skinless:
1. my symptoms were burning during urination, fever, nausea and incontinence. let me note that i gave this less that 24 hours before i consulted a doctor, as the burning was clearly not one of my usual "ate the wrong street food" symptoms, and i was perfectly aware of the specific risks of my behavior. it is worth noting that many men are asymptomatic for chlamydia.
2. my symptoms are gone, and according to what i've read the disease should be essentially knocked out of my system at this point since it's been a week, though i'm obviously going to finish the full cycle of treatment and do a follow-up. i should no longer be a risk to any partner.
3. absolutely, i'm staying hydrated to the max, and it's all bottled water. i do a lot of walking around here, it's far hotter than what i'm used to even though it's the cool season, and i'm probably going through nearly a gallon of water a day. i've little doubt this aids in flushing the system, since mine's certainly been flushing out fair amounts of water the past several days. better too much than too little in this regard.
and i'm absolutely going to let my partner from kangaroo know when i return to bangkok next week, as she's clearly more at risk from me from this particular disease, even had i not gotten cleaned up. good to hear, skinless, that the bb one has gotten herself taken care of -- i hope she understands that this is an occupational hazard that she needs to take care of in order to safeguard her future. i've been hanging out with a friend in chiang mai who's adopted a nice kid whose mother died from aids, and he is pretty rep001hing, given the thai obsession with family, which has a pretty loose definition, on the attitudes of thais about the problems of people not part of their own family.
If you are coming up with diseases frequently, it can be a sign of a larger problem with your immune system which may be lower due to alcohol or drugs, pre-existing conditions, etc. Just because you are exposed to a virus doesn't mean you get sick.
I remember back in the 80's when HIV was a very scary subject and a lot of the medical people were scaring the crap out of everyone with doom and gloom scenarios. I had to work very hard to get good research about what it meant for me and my hobby.
Getting a disease like gonnorea from receiving oral sex or even kissing, as is suggested on some medical web-sites, fits it he category of a needless fright tactic directed at teens, IMO.
As far as giving oral to a Thai working girl, thats a big no-no. Blood is the area of extreme concern as far as HIV goes. Although its a manageable disease now, you don't want to run that risk.
If I was going to do that, first fews days in Bangkok I'd take my preferred girl for some very good tests (no test is 100%) and then keep her for the duration.
joe_zop
sorry to read that you had some health-related concerns spoiling your time in LOS, and glad that it seems over by now.
In your most recent post, you mention "a friend in Chiang Mai who's adopted a nice kid whose mother died from AIDS".
Would you care indicating what illness exactly took the life of the kid's mother ?
mojosaur:
you write "As far as giving oral to a Thai working girl, thats a big no-no. Blood is the area of extreme concern as far as HIV goes. Although its a manageable disease now, you don't want to run that risk.
If I was going to do that, first fews days in Bangkok I'd take my preferred girl for some very good tests (no test is 100%) and then keep her for the duration."
HIV is NOT a disease, and HIV infection is NOT manageable. If your tests turn positive, the good doctors will submit you to an extremely unpleasant cocktail of drugs for a very long time (in fact until you die of it).
As for your second idea, concentrating on one girl makes sense since you avoid the promiscuity issue, but there can be no certainty that she is virus-free. You might be focusing on the very one who will contaminate you...
Let's face it: *****mongering is a somewhat dangerous activity.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Seydlitz
[
Let's face it: *****mongering is a somewhat dangerous activity. [/i][/QUOTE]
Yes, but the danger is relative to one's practices. I did it all over the world for 20 years and have never gotten so much as a cold sore.
Using condoms is common sense....giving oral sex with a lot of mouth to mucous membrane contact is not a good idea, assuming that one wants to remain healthy.
More importantly, there is no reason anyone should ever get it, *****mongering or not. It is 100% preventable.
I was just trying to suggest a few ways this fellow could minimize his risks and still do his thing. Although a negative test would not be 100%, it would be a lot better than Russian roulette.
Afar as the flushing thing goes, I've always been told by my doctors that drinking large amounts of water helps flush gremlins out of the system in a general sense, STDs or not. It's hardly anything remotely like a treatment -- it's just something that aids the healing process when already using the medicine you've been given. At least that was my understanding -- but doctors being the way they are, I may have been being told this simply to improve my overall health when sick, which is fine enough by me.
Wildman -- yes, they did a urinalysis, which is where an infection was found, and it's entirely possible, given how lousy a communicator the doctor was, that it was a bladder infection. Nothing would please me more for that to be the truth, but I'm not going to presume anything further until I do my follow-up and have a good talk with him. As I mentioned, however, I hydrate like mad when in warm climates, as I've gotten seriously dehydrated once in the past and did not like what it did to the rest of my trip. The rest of the symptoms could well simply be bad street food, as I do a lot of buying from vendors (half the fun of being here.) I don't think he was unsure -- he may in fact have been being discreet since I was there with my friend and his wife. I've never had a prostrate problem, and had a full physical before I left, including the lovely prostrate exam.
Thanks for the Bumrungrad suggestion, I may indeed look into their Executive suite. As far as it goes, at this point I'm planning on a full run of STD tests here after I finish my doxy cycle, and doing the same with the tilac I'm planning to spend extended time with, as she's new to the game and more than a bit sexually naive. (Haven't had that conversation yet, though, but I've very little doubt that she'll agree.) Probably will follow up with another once I get home.
Mojo, I've agreed with you in most cases, but according to all of my reading there is as close to no risk as is defineable of HIV transmission via oral sex, even in the case where both partners have membrane damage. I do not have any such damage in my mouth, and while I acknowledge and have stated that my behavior entailed risk, I do not believe HIV infection was on the risk menu, and I know of no authority that feels it is. Saliva has consistently been shown to neutralize HIV.
Seydlitz -- I know your position on this, as you and I have had excellent critical discussions in the past. I only know what my friend stated about the girl's mother, and it would be rather indelicate to pry, especially as he spoke with great emotion about the process of watching her die. I know your position on the whole thing, and your interest in issues of definition, but this is not a situation at this point where I'm comfortable inquiring further.
For what it's worth, all, I'm feeling fine now, I intend fully to follow up and make sure I understand completely what I had and didn't have and further issues, both for my own health and for that of others. To be honest, I just felt so much like crap at the time (and had been having frustration after frustration -- net access not working, several thousand dollars not deposited into my account as promised before I left) that I just wanted something to fix it, so my analytic abilities were undoubtedly not at full force.
Skinless, you're darn right -- STDs are equal-opportunity buggers, and uneducated TGs don't come up with them like magic -- they get given them by somebody, but they, like everyone else, will believe the easiest way out in order not to have to think it. I've considered myself lucky to date to have avoided everything, and I've made my personal decisions regarding the degrees of risk I am willing to take or not take, and a patial departure from my usual practices may well have been what helped lead me down the path I followed. But if you have multiple partners, which most here do, and in an area of higher risk, you simply increase the odds you pay the piper. Given the stats I've seen in the past on the number of Thai sex workers who are infected, I'm frankly surprised that Skinless and I are really the only ones to bring it up on a personal basis at all. (I have a really hard time believing everyone on this forum scrupulously practices totally safe sex, especially given past discussions.) And if nothing else, misinformation or not, this is really the first decent discussion here on this stuff in quite some time, and I want to thank you all for your suggestions and help.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by skinless
[i]Joe: If he is checking out your prostate, chances are you have a bad STI itraveling up your dick even as we speak! Trust me on this one.
Drink lots of water, try some cranberry juice, nothing bitter or hot like spices. And stay away from that shit street food like you are some LP back packing moron. If there is no flowing water, only eat hot dogs on the street. But pay the extra $$ and don't be a food poisoned moron. Hey, there is a good Isaan babe selling fruit juices, 20 bt a shot, well worth it, between the nite market and the moat, all day long. Considering lots of TGs shave their pussies coz customers like to eat them (spicy food beware) chances are you are right and lotsa guys have little souvenirs. Oh. Stay sober too. No alcohol either. [/i][/QUOTE]
Skinless -- no, the doctor here did not check my prostate; that was part of the physical I took before leaving (which I included as info in response to Wildman.) And I've reduced somewhat my street food intake, or more accurately that containing meat that's been standing -- I've got no problem with things like Pad Thai or Roti where I watch everything being cooked for me. As far as alcohol -- again, my Bangkok night was a major exception from which I've learned my lesson, and only happened because I fell in with that bar owner who insisted on buying shots of things to celebrate his girlfriend's birthday. If I go drinking, my max is generally three Singhas a night, spaced out over four or five hours with non-alcoholic spacers in between. I'd also guess I've probably hit almost every one of the little carts with fruit juices and shakes around my part of town -- I absolutely love them. If you were to see my fridge right now, you'd see ten large bottles of water, two cartons of orange juice, one of pineapple, one of cranberry, some fresh fruit, and probably two diet cokes. I'm mostly pretty simple and healthy on all this stuff, really -- my lunch today was at a restaurant, a little Thai soup and a salad and water and juice to drink. If I get sick again at this point, it's more than likely because it rained so long and so hard last night in CM that all the tuk-tuks were swamped and I had to walk home through flooded streets where the lovely brown water was mostly up to my knees... :)
No offense intended Joe.
Absolutely none taken -- we're all big boys here :)
Wildman,
<<<QUOTE: I think N-11 refers to the size of the condom: 11 mm? Poor Freeler
Hey! It's just a joke, OK?
wildman>>>
Your 'joke' on the size of the N-11 condom, as far as I'm concerned is :
"Deliberate Disinformation".
Maybe you could make this wrong right by stating the true size of that condom, so the readers all understand why they might want to find N-11 instead of other condoms in Thailand.
Thank you very much!
BTW What happened to your posts?
I am going to Bangkok with my girlfriend and we are planning on a threesome. (2 f 1 m) What precautions should I take besides the obvious condom and her (the thai girl) to give and receive oral sex?
Thanks a lot for your help guys.... Hope I can return the favour....
ClitSucker,
with all due respect, this is a stupid question.
You intend to have intercourse with a commercial sex provider. What makes you believe that there would be anything special about doing it in Bangkok ?
The usual precautions will do fine.
As one of my best friends once said:
"If I'm going to get AIDS from eating pussy, then I'm going to get AIDS from eating pussy."
Just about sums it up, don't you think?
i figured i should post a follow-up, since i blathered on around here with my travails earlier. when i got back home i had another bout with the same symptoms as when i was in los. went to my regular doctor, and he prescribed both the same doxy as the doc i saw in chiang mai, noting that both clamydia and a urinary tract infection were likely, took a [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] sample, and also gave me a shot for other nasties just in case. got a call today after i called to check on the sample -- a confirmed hit for gonorrea.
so, i'm officially on the list of the bitten or the "clapped" (though supposedly i'm also now on the list of the cured -- we'll see for sure once my follow-up sample is tested) and i'll note again that i always use a condom for intercourse, so this most likely comes from unprotected oral, either giving or receiving. (though you can get it from physical contact as well.) let me note that both times the symptoms have appeared (generally, they show up 2-5 days after exposure) was after i'd been in bangkok, and while i can be certain that's where i picked it up the first time, i cannot pinpoint things as specifically the second, as i was with multiple partners, was in and out of bangkok both times, and the symptoms can show up at different intervals. the second time it could have come either from there or pattaya. i've got a vague suspicion that i know who i got it from, as i had one partner in common both trips, but it could also have come from two different partners.
the message is simply that it's out there, and that people do catch things -- so be aware and be careful. i'm lucky enough to have gotten through it with only a few days of discomfort in both cases, but not everyone gets off so easy, particularly if you don't do the follow-up, and also if you don't have visible symptoms. i don't think this will cause me to radically change my behavior, but i may be a bit more careful my next time around the big durian.
joe_zop,
Welcome to the "clapper club".....haha..... I got that one too, and I got from unprotected oral sex (receiving end...who'd want to eat a hookers pussy!!! Yuck!). Anyways, you're right...a few days discomfort, take a pill or two and that should be it. Anyone who thinks they can't get a STD from a blow job should get their head examined. Enough said. "Wrap that willy"! Hope you're feeling better.
Perhaps the title of this section of the board is an oxymoron?
Interesting post Joe. Luckily you did not get it in the throat as that is very hard to clear. These women are walking with it; huge infection rates. I will try to be careful (this time) but it is hard to be a virgin!
Did you get one or two separate infections? Also, the dose you got seemeed to be quite benign. The BB One gave me a really bad one. See, they get infected, and keep on fucking so it gets worse. Then they pass it round (with some help obviously). This is a high risk activity and it is good to be reminded of this. Plenty of Purple Hearts here in the line of duty!!
Chikan: lotsa guys like DATY but the whole scene is risky. Also, you are somewhat complacent. Some of those strains are very resistant to pills. The pills work on the asumption we act like good ol' Joe; we take the pills, keep our dick in our pants and inform our partners etc etc. Now Joe will do all of that. But these babes will not. Every time we fuck/suck etc one of them, we are taking a BIG risk. They have no education, they want our $$ and they are not going to tell us they are giving us a souvenir.
Also, here is a philsophical question: let's say you take alady long time or for a long time as Joe did. Seydlitz and other gurus have told us that, in general, these ladies confine themselves to reading comics, talking to their friends on mobiles, watching teen TV and, of course, earning their keep by bbbjs, bonkingm oral, anal etc. Now, if we do NOT experiment, waha do we do with them besides take them shopping or shit like that. I do not want to appear mean or cruel but, bonking their brains out apart, what more can we do with them? Discuss Iraq, Michael Jordan, George Bush's state of the union address, what besised fuck and experiment. And if we are going to do that, we ARE going to catch something nasty
Skinless -- amen to the throat thing. I understand it can also difficult to clear from the eyes, which you can get by touching there after touching an infected area. As far as behavior, well, we're engaged in a high-risk activity and in LOS we're doing it in a higher-than-average risk arena. I consider myself lucky to have escaped things to this point, and I certainly can't imagine, after this, wandering around and boinking sans condom. I wonder if this is an argument for or against seeking out experienced providers -- newbies may be more naive or uneducated about their perils, but their risks of exposure are also lower. Hmm.
It appears I got it two separate times, and that's what my doctor thinks as well. He says the it's likely the first dose was cleared up and that I got a second one just before I left, based on the way my symptoms appeared. I certainly hope that's true -- I don't like the idea that I might have been wandering around with it for a couple of months. At the very least, though, my doctor assures me that even if I didn't completely get rid of the first dose, it was knocked down well enough that I wasn't wandering around infecting people, which is a relief. You may be right that I didn't get a horrific strain -- it wasn't pleasant, it wasn't something I'm looking to do again, but it was certainly bearable. Could also be that I caught it early or could be my metabolism -- I'm one of those lucky folks who never seem to get quite as sick (or as drunk) as others just because of how I'm wired. (Doesn't mean I can't whine like a baby with the best of y'all though when it happens, though!)
And you're right about the ladies -- few if any of them are going to lose income waiting for something to clear up. Even presuming they get it taken care of and take the medicine, which is a big presumption, they're still going to accept the barfines while the process is going on, and they're damn sure not going to tell us anything about it. And most of them are just going to be clueless about even why they should get it taken care of once the symptoms disappear -- I had a discussion once with a TG there about what STDs could do to her, and it took a very long time for her to even understand that being sterile didn't mean not having babies while she was on the job, it meant not having babies ever. Once she got this she was very concerned -- who was going to take care of her when she got old?
As far as your philosophical question -- and I'll risk this even though it's a bit off-topic here, as this sort of conversation has rather died out in the Thai Women section -- I think it totally depends on who you're with and what your approach happens to be. One thing I learned from spending a bit of time as a journalist years ago is that if you find the right way in, people will talk to you nonstop about just about anything, because by and large they don't get enough of a chance to talk about themselves. I've never particularly had a problem finding things to talk about with TGs I've spent a long time with -- they're usually happy to talk about how they grew up, their homes, differences in cultures, etc. If you ask them to explain a Thai situation or concept (greng jai, for example, or anything of the kind -- giving an uneducated person a chance to be a teacher can really open them up) they're usually happy to rattle on about it, particularly if you can relate it to the strange ways farang think and act as opposed to the Thais, as that can help them understand why their customers are so strange. They're often very interested in anything about how different other parts of the world are compared to Thailand -- but the connection with LOS is a must. Also, famous people, most especially good-looking famous men -- mooning over David Beckham, for example, seems universal, though interestingly doing the same over Paradorn seems 50-50. (Again, something fairly normal, I think, for young women dreaming of better lives.) On one occasion, I made fun of a TG's extreme interest in Beckham and Brad Pitt, since they're both married, and suggested she dream of Russell Crowe instead, since he wasn't married at the time. She didn't know who that was, and we had a hilarious time running to an internet cafe and tracking down info and pictures about him, who promptly went to the top of her list. (I was thanked nicely later, btw, "F**k me now, Russell" became a recurring joke.) From a completely practical side of things, I've found that expressing an interest in what she thinks about can add to the GFE and lower prices as well.
One of the reasons I stayed with my college student a long time was precisely that she could not only carry but could initiate a conversation, and she had a working brain as well as a hot bod -- it wasn't all TV or mobile, though the latter was certainly pumping a lot of the time as well, which I simply consider normal for a woman in her early twenties with lots of family and friends. (Thankfully, she had the ability to ignore it also.) She was fascinated by the books I had about Thailand, we spoke quite a bit about the workings of Thai culture versus that of other parts of the world, and she wanted to know anything I could tell her about India, Africa, etc. Discussions about price differences was a never-ending topic -- when I talked about how much money I earned she was interested and intrigued, but even moreso when I talked about how much things cost in the US compared to LOS, and how people lived. The TV she was watching was not the soaps -- she stayed up for a while until 4am simply because there was a Thai show about Muslims, Ramadam in particular. (Turns out she had an ex-boyfriend who was Muslim, but still.)
Obviously, YMMV, but I look at it this way -- most people you talk to, anywhere in the world, are focused first on themselves and their families, so why should TGs be any different? The trick is directly relating other topics to that, and not expecting big discussions on world politics, though often you can get definite insight on Thai politics and culture if you ask about it correctly.
Joe: Beckham is certainly da ma. Have you seen his homo erotic poses in his books. Talk about chasing market share.
I think it rather worrying that a smart guy like you got caught twice. STIs are endemic in LOS and it is bad we do not post more on it. The safe sex campaigns are propaganda as the girls won't reform and as for us....
I never want another does like that one I got this time last year.
I will stop here or we will get back to our mermaid discussion.They are so alluring and so fatal, for all of us and for themselves. The funny thing is AdleZ had a point all along. I'm sure you've seen the flame "war" in the Banned section. People who met NR say he's a good guy in person too. The funny thing about this board is it puts all of us together:all our differnet backgrounds, fetishes etc.
I guess Pattaya and Bkk canbe ok. You pay 2000 bt all in (shoping etc) a day and you get to swan around with a beauty. Great if that is what you want. But waht do you do after the orgy is over?
Yes, the Nibu discussion has been a hoot -- Dickhead's parody had me rolling. It, along with Z, show that people's online personas don't always reflect reality, but we can only deal with what we see and know, I guess. Same same with TGs.
As far as STDs go -- I know plenty of really smart people who died from AIDS, and history has lots of examples that prove how well the brain works means very little when it comes to the libido. Frankly, I've been incredibly lucky over the years rather than incredibly smart about things, relying on my strong metabolism (which is rather dense considering how young men are when they tend to croak in my family) -- heaven knows my drug-taking days back in the 70s weren't exactly paradigms of intelligent living. I've been fastidious about condoms for intercourse, as I've watched people suffer with AIDS and there's no way I'm at all interested in that experience. But two STD examples makes for a lesson learned, and I'll decidedly be a bit more circumspect about my behavior, at least in the higher-traffic areas such as Bangkok and Pattaya. It's the usual tough choice between the sexual acts you like and the life you want to keep living.
I do think we should be discussing this more, as I seriously doubt there are only a couple of us who've had this experience, given the overall incidence of things. But it may be like anything else online -- field reports, for example -- people may be getting, but they ain't telling. This is not exactly a topic people really want to think about as opposed to thinking about the next hottie they're going to explore, and with good reason. Heck, I'd rather think about that!
And as far as the whole mermaid thing -- I always think of the Stevie Smith poem title: "Not Waving But Drowning" as something that's extremely resonant. Them and us both. The orgy question's the same everywhere, isn't it? If you're going to spend time with someone there's got to be some kind of common ground or some area to explore or it gets old really fast. That was, of course, Z's whole assertion in a nutshell, but I guess I've just got far more in common with the poor and uneducated than him, being as I'm someone from the general range of the bad side of the tracks in the first place. I figure I can spend three or four days with just about anyone, male of female, before I get too bored, and can probably hide it or entertain myself for a couple days more, so I just don't find it all that tough to spend longer times with TGs or anyone else who's sharing my bed. Maybe it's just a matter of temperment -- I am generally bemused by life in any event, so I like to enjoy the process, good, full of disaster, whatever, if only so I can laugh about it later. As long as no one's getting hurt it's only time and/or money, and neither of those are anything to get too exercised about.
STIS: as long as some of us post, it means lurkers and others are aware of the (very considerable) risks. One of the problems of the Net is there is a lot of misinformation out there. People like us, when we escape for years, we get complacent and, then, wham. To me, it is like heavy drinking or drug taking. have a binge but move on. I posted about the Zona Roxa in Acapulco (no condoms and bring a machette) and the market in Mexico city. WTF was I doing there? Was I mad? (yes).
The whole sex scene is fascinating. Maybe we are doomed to bonk until we die. To die with our condoms on!
Here follows a quote from the KL board from a regular user. Follow ups have asked if herpes is curable. Am I the only one here into using toys and other safe sex implements on these providers?
[QUOTE]Originally posted by monsterfacial
[i]Sorry to be a wet blanket....but I have just been tested positive for Genital Herpes............and being a Graduate...I play very safe ...complete with condom while having sex but unfortunately it is the groin area that have contracted the Herpes infection.....
I mean read about ....the infectious nature about the Herpes virus and it will scare the pants out of you...........Waking up the next morning with suspicious blisters in the groin area is not the advertisement for the breakfast of champions...but rather the
fucked up and the most dum asses in the world.... [/i][/QUOTE]
From what i know (correct me if am wrong) from my research is that herpes is not curable. I however goes into remission and flares up once in a while. One have to be careful when it is active as you are likely to spread it by contact
Remember, the cold sores some people have on their lips is the same thing (herpes). They just travelled upstairs. So, if a person with cold sores kisses the dicks you will have genital herpes.
Be carefull, fellow *****mongers. Check out the lips when having BBBJ.
Maybe prescreening for herpes using PocKit is a solution. There is an on-going discussion
about using OraQuick and PocKit in the safe sex section (under special interests).
... herpes...
Maybe you better do some research at some medicinal oriented sites like [url]www.herpes.org/[/url] ?
Gentlemen: Please excuse my earlier post as i was very tired. I find it intersting (and worrying) that herpes is doing the rounds in SE Asia and that one of our top posters got it. I also find it worrying that a fellow poster did not know herpes has no cure (or bothered looking it up - but on the Thai sction, guys ask for weather tips). My point is very simple: there are a lot of infections out there and the infection rate is a lot higher among both mongers and providers than we like to think it is. Many, if not al of these women (and many men, like me), will fuck anything if the price is right. I did a rough count and I had sex with over 30 women in my latest trip. No more than 4 of them insisted on condoms. And thye were all newbies. There is a lot of misinformation on the Internet. Do not get an STI as a consequnece of that misinformation.
Skinless,
Did you insist on the rain coat when the TG didn't?
What do you think? I go there to fuck them and the name implies I do have my prrejudices. Do as I preach, not as I say. The odds of catching a nasty virus are quite high in LOS. The doctor seemed unconcerend about STIs (we have medicines) but warned me against HIV (no cure). You make your own conclusions from that. Another thing is guys are just interested in posting shit (she had big tits, 9/10). most are lurkers and almost all pretend there is no risk. The risk is big and real. That I take risks does not mean you should. So far, three people have owned up to Purple Hearts. I ma sure more here got bad doses but will not admit it.
Excerpt from www.herpes.org
"Herpes is a virus that infects the nervous system, modifying the DNA of the nerve cells supplying the skin through which the virus entered. The infection is permanent. Most patients suffer from recurrences that may vary in frequency from once in a lifetime to non-stop infections that never go away. The average rate of recurrences is about four times per year, plus or minus one. Recurrences typically take about a week or so to heal. This means that the average untreated person with HI spends about a month out of the year with lesions. "
If u read my note I had said there is no cure (I should have said "permanent").
As I said, be careful.
Kekekeke asked on th KL board if it is curable. I find it very interesting that few on the KL board seem to give a shit. If MF has herpes, who else has it? There is little doubt but that the litle head rules permanently here. I am definitely going to try to change my lifestyle as fucking the scum of Thailand is not a recipe for long term health. MY problem is i am over sexed and I find pumping pussy a good stress relief.
Many of them are lovely and good people but they get 0/100 on matters of sex hygiene and we are not much better. On several occasions, I fucked women where there was a quite high risk but I fucked them anyway. It is not that MF has been particularly unlucky, just that we have been lucky so far.
Also, Duni, you are ocnfusing genital and oral herpes.
Internet orders of herpes prescreening kit:
For those of you who want to check if the girl you picked has herpes-2 (even if she is not having an outbreak), I found a web site for ordering the PocKit 10-minute test kits
[url=http://www.bvquadro.com/phirstuse/phirstuse_buy.htm]http://www.bvquadro.com/phirstuse/phirstuse_buy.htm[/url]
I have not tried them yet.
Oops, wrong PocKit. Sorry.
Anyone knows how to get the real one?
Anyone remember the scene in Clerks with the 'Wrigley's Chewing Gum' Guy?
Skinless, this simply shows what we all know -- the more partners you have, the more likely your exposure and/or infection. It only takes one time to be wrong, as MF's experience (and our own) demonstrates.
And if people on this board are going to display the levels of ignorance that they constantly do, what are we to expect of a sex worker off a sheltered Issan farm, for whom buying or insisting on condoms basically means fewer baht for herself?
The Thais have actually done a really excellent job in the past decade on condom education, but the problem is that it's mostly been targetted toward members of the military and getting them to wear condoms. It's reduced the rate of HIV infection, which was well on its way to terrifying, but it can be truly scary to sit down (and I say this as someone who's done this on several occasions) and have a conversation with a TG about what she does and doesn't think to be true about STDs and condoms.
JZ,
As an example of the lack of understanding/education. The TG that I spent most of my time with insisted on condom use even for a BJ. This is good, but, her reasoning was that she didn't want to get pregnant. Obviously, a solid educational agenda would be a good thing for the government.
Yeah, I had similar conversations, as well as one where the TG was convinced that taking birth control pills or getting the patch would also protect her from STDs. But, honestly, I think the ignorance on this board is far more alarming -- I expect it from Third World ladies with moderate or minimal education, but presumably folks here have a bit more access to viable information...
Dear Mr Zop: you are, indeed, correct. The ignorance here is alarming in many ways.
1. We pracrice unsafe sex.
2. MF tells the truth and the lurkers attack him. If thye do not intend to screw him, and thereby risk him infecting them, they should be much more concerned with the riff raff they are bonking and abusing.
3. These women must be walking laboratories of all imaginable diseases. Not only are they uneducated but they are also very obliging. Notice the amount of them who have shaved pussies: my 600 bt bar fine + 1000 bt st er from near Nana last time round told me she shaves her pussy as so many of us like to DATY. I have noticed the little F machine from Soi 7, Pattaya now shaves her and little Lek (reminds me of a Japanese motor bike - great f engine) also shaves hers. That is coz we like to dine where others dine
So Monster Facial got herpes and Joe and Igot the clap (but not from each other). Anyone else get wounded in action? I think it would be much more beneficial to share stories about this than to talk about upset tummies and what a wonderful bbbj some dixie cup whose name we don't recall gives.
I got the clap by going bb and by letting my dick lie inside my BB lovely. I had previously been seduced by all the "risk is minimal" propaganda on the Intenret, this site included. The drips started in earnest 3 days after my tour ended and it was a very sore experience I would wish never to repeat. It took over 6 weeks of heavy medication to clean it up. That's waht I get for fucking a lady who has only her pussy and tits and kissing (GFE!) to offer me and anyone else with 1000 bt.
I took some risks this time too but am probably ok.
All I have is one cold sore and a swollen neck!
Skinless, you are right about what we should be discussing here.
I don't know who MF is, but, if he got something and was giving warning to others, it's pretty fucked up to give him shit.
It would probably be a good idea if he could ID any of the ladies he's been with (names, bar, number) that way we could avoid them.
For my part, I wear a raincoat for sex and BJ. I don't dine at the Y. And, rarely DFK. I'm still scared of what I could catch.
BTW, for those of you who think that wearing a jimmy cap is 100% protection from HIV, think again. The standard for porousness is [i]such that no more than two single cell organisms could pass through side by side[/i]. I'd quote the source, but the STD course I attended was a couple years ago, and I don't have my notes any more. But, that little factoid has stuck with me.
purplengold:
[i]
> BTW, for those of you who think that wearing a jimmy cap is 100% protection from HIV,
> think again
[/i]
It's only 85% protection, compared to BB.
I posted the reference URL in the safe sex section (special interests) a couple of days ago.
Purplengold,
Well, it now s-e-e-m-s that usualy barebacking Mr. Monsterfacial contracted a fungus.
Funghii are transmitable in many ways, including the nicest way: sex.
But they can be contracted from many sources.
These sources are mainly unhygenic. Dirty towels, dirty toilets, filthy underwear...
The wounds caused by some of these funghii can take months to heal, and the blisters they cause make you think: H-E-R-P-E-S, as I know from experience.
You need the right medication and some checks for syphilis, because, as my dermotologist told me, for a doctor the difference between herpes and a fungus is clear. But fungal infections and syphilis look very similar, even to the trained eye.
Dirty toilets, Freeler????
Although we should be glad MF has not herpes, we should be glad he posted a very timely warning.
Also, Thailand, Malaysia etc are ripe for all kinds of viruses and bugs. Even Freeler picked up something last time round (infected leg).
I think I got something n my mouth but it might have been the change of air after I left LOS.
I guess some of us are addicted to this and will fuck until we have to stop. I am already planning another mongering trip, maybe more upscale and less travel. Unless I can find a nice, congenial mistress here.
Skinless,
'Dirty toilets, Freeler????'
I knew that would wake you up!
Yes Skinless, dirty toilets.
I got it in PI where the toilet bowls are so small your hanging bits go tick-tick against the side...
It took me a bit too long to adjust, got it and it took months to get rid of it.
And it gawwddammed HURT!
A fungus is a smart buggar, it lives a long time after leaving a host... and it will find a new one.
You?
I too have been in the PI. They have the filthiest toilets I have ever seen: fit only for rats and pigs. It is a miracle you are still alive. I am, however, surprised you never got a Delhi belly attack.
Any ideas what this bug I have is? Maybe a flu? I ownder if it is sex related.
Skinless,
'I am, however, surprised you never got a Delhi belly attack.'
Well, if a Delhi Belly is any kind of runs, of course I had that. But I could always find another reason for it than food.
But I never had foodpoisoning (=salmonella) in Thailand or anywhere in the tropics.
'I wonder if it is sex related.'
Ask your doctor. Don't forget to tell her that you love dining at the Y:)!
Freeeler: you are not being nice to me. Here is a question. What % of these ladies have diseased pussies, asses, mouths? I owuld reckon, based on Joe_Zop's et al's confessions (maybe he should be on Jerry Springer) very very high. Freeler: do you always practice safe sex (except in Pi toilets)> Do you just get your kicks by dressing like a rubber freak, smearing them (and you?) in ky jelly and taking te most bizarre (I won't say perverted) photos of them. What must they think of farangs ho get them to pose as flounder at a fish market? Is htat what inspired all the sushi/sashimi talk?
On a lsightly different matter: has anyone kinda bought a sex slave? I know this is off topic but I figure a long termer (not AdleZ) might have indulged. I might relocate there for some years but it would be nice to have a lady on tap to do the washing, manicure me, scrub me and fuck me whenever I felt like it. Competent cooking would be a plus. say 20 k bt a month with lodging.
Skinless,
I may not be nice to you, but you are disappointing!
Asking questions like:
'Freeler: do you always practice safe sex '
You know the answer. It is: Y-E-S I D-O !
No, I do not like the sight of my dick wrapped in rubber at all. But if I want to keep doing what I like to do, that's of course 'come to Thailand and enjoy', I know I have to.
The KY is there for the same reason.
And the photo's? Guys, Mr. Skinless is just jealous.
He can get the pussy, but never takes a shot!
Talking of photo's. Joe_zop promissed me a sample of his girls in the shape of jpegs. None have entered my mailbox to date...
'has anyone kinda bought a sex slave?'
I haven't.
But the manicure, the washing, the cocksucking, all comes with the girl if she likes you enough to ask you to stay at her room.
Last time I had this pleasure it was just B500 a day, in Pattaya. That's including the room, the sex and some drinks as well.
We went out for dinner, which I paid for, so don't call me cheap!
As far as [i]'buying'[/i] a sex slave, I was thinking about this idea for a longer trip. I thought it would be cool to rent a nicer apartment for a month. Something in a high rise so the street noise is minimal, a jacuzzi, california king-size bed, etc.
Then, spend a few days wandering the bars looking for a few girls who would be amenable to being sex bunnies for a few weeks. Basically pay them a good rate but have rules like: only lingerie or nudity while in the house, meet me at the door when I come in and perform some sexual act as a hello, bathe and manicure me, sex/smoking on demand... Damn! I want to go back to LOS!
Figure 3 or 4 girls for about 100,000B + food/rent? Is this reasonable?
Skinless,
Remember Progman, the guy whose tripreports you didn't want in your mail?
He just wrote this on the AC board:
'Hope you get over that sore throat soon - too much DATY if you ask me.'
Now, doesn't that sound familiar?
PNG,
"100,000B'.. You just failed your first Freeler's Bargaining Course test:(!
Freeler -- spank taken, I'll try work on the photos (gotta organize them and chop them down, unless you like 8 meg jpgs.) Haven't actually checked that mailbox in a while...
General maid cost estimates, listed by the Thai government, run 6000 to 10,000baht per month for Bangkok -- it's cheaper elsewhere. So Skinless, I think you're probably reasonably close in your rates. PNG presumes paying pretty premium rates, probably what you'd get if you're planning to track them down by scouring go-gos, but in that case you'd better plan on paying barfines for all of them on an ongoing basis as well, as no TG is going to quit her job there for only a guaranteed month. A place to stay and ongoing employment obviously would keep costs lower than a one-month rental approach. That said, PNG, if you're planning to pay 25-30k per girl per month, or basically 1000baht a day, you're certainly not going to have much trouble filling your roster! Staying alive in such an environment and keeping the ladies all there, focused only on you, and getting along with each other is another matter entirely.
And as far as this topic -- the issue is whether or not people are taking risks with knowledge or not. Skinless took risks this time with clear understanding of the potential consequences, Freeler looks at the risks and decides to avoid them completely. I fall in the middle, choosing to be safer than Skinless and less so than Freeler. But all of us are doing this with knowledge of what is at stake -- people will behave in whatever ways they wish, but those who engage in unsafe behaviors based on lack of knowledge are far more dangerous, in my opinion, than those who know the risks but decide what their tolerance is toward them. The latter also know enough to know when concern is warranted, how generally to minimize their risks, and to get treated in the event there's a problem. The ignorant are generally oblivious hear-no, see-no, speak-no monkeys.
Joe,
you are right; keeping ladies locked in and ready to please is a big chalenge.
The Vietnamese emperor Tu Duc (I think in the late 18th century) had a harem of more than a hundred concubines. He once remarked that the Empire was easier to rule than the harem, with all the favorites fighting each other and meddling with politics.
He even sent a large number of them packing once...
Joe_zop,
Check your mail for a photo downsizing tip!
I wasn't thinking of keeping them locked up. I was thinking more of a playboy mansion deal. The girls with me most of the time. Going out bar hopping at night... I'd be on vacation, so the only time I would leave would be so that I could come home and get the described welcome home :)
Freeler. Damn! I'll do better. But, I was thinking ~1000B/day/girl with a slight discount because of the long term opportunity. Also, I was thinking of Freelancers so that the bar-fine wouldn't be an issue. What would you say is the correct price?
Information found on this WSG site regarding the herpes test kit, "PocKit" was GREAT! However, my initial investigation and contact with the company Diagnology indicates I must find a local physician to order the kits for me. The OraQuick for HIV testing can be ordered in 25 lots directly off their web site: www.orasure.com in that quantity they are $300. or $12.00 per kit. I went to the Central Idaho District Health Center and told Sherry I was going to Thailand and she said I should probably go ahead and start the Hepatitis A, B series (second one in a month, just before I leave and last one 6 months from now then I'll be set on those for the rest of my life). Also she gave me a typhoid immunization, tetnus because it's good for only 10 years, and did another polio vaccine since the last time I had it was, as a kid. She also gave me about 50 condoms, she said they are still the best protection! Not to brag but I'll probably need more than that!!! Lastly . . . though I don't want to be mistaken for Michael Jackson, I 'm seriously considering wearing a surgical (respiratory) mask to and from Thailand on the commercial jet. Also thinking about taking sleeping pills, one of those travel neck pillows, earplugs, and try and sleep for most of the 20 hour duration flight. Lon
As I did say on the CM-thread: I will not indulge in any immunity discussion - but I guess some of you want to read this:
[url]www.musc.edu/dc/icrebm/sensitivity.html[/url]
Zidaho
Thank you for your post. I took the liberty of copying the part about test kits to the safe sex section (under special interests) where the discussion has taken place.
If you find the test kits in Thailand, please share your experience with us.
Sabio, Philo,
Like Philo I avoid this discussion like the plague, BUT when false statistics are used, my blood boils and I can'd help myself, so:
'But there is another side to the test. Of our original one million, 990,000 are not infected. If we look at the test results on the HIV negative population (remember the specificity of the assay is 99.9%), we find that 989,010 are found to be not infected by the ELISA (true negatives -- TN), but we have 990 individuals who are found to be positive by the ELISA (false positives -- FN).'
FUCK THAT!!!
ONLY people who KNOW they have a reason to be tested get tested. NOT the others in the population of 1,000,000.
So, the entire bit between' and ' sucks and therefore the rest of the story.
A test that is 99.9% reliable is as reliable as ANYTHING gets.
My first and last 2cents on this.
Peace:)
I think the key issue in the citation is that out of the hypothetical one million tested with 1% infected, ten out of the ten thousand who [i]are[/i] infected would produce false negatives. A false positive isn't what is the concern -- if you test positive obviously you're going to want to be retested, and confirm things. The concern is those who are told they're negative when in fact they're not, as then you open to door to potentially unsafe behavior. If .1% of the infected population is going to be missed by the test, then in Thailand, where the infection rate is in the 2% range, that means that if you gave everyone in the country a test, 1200 people who were infected would show up as ok.
That's looking at things completely on a vanilla statistical basis, and it would be very worrisome to say that there were 1200 TGs running around who'd been tested as clean who were not. The reality is different, of course. (But since the discussion has been about testing kits...)
Thailand's efforts have changed things, and improved the infection rate in the commercial sex environment, where condoms are far more frequently used than in the past. A decade or so ago 80% of all AIDS cases in Thailand came from sex workers and their clients. The most recent information I've been able to find says that the vast majority of new HIV/AIDS cases in Thailand are now husband/wife, drug users, or male-male sex, and that 20% come from sex workers and their clients.
BTW, Thailand's Health Ministry announced a couple of months ago that the infection rate among Thai teenagers, one of the high risk groups, had risen substantially over the past year, with the rate of increase rising from 11 to 17%. This runs counter to recent years, when the number of new STD cases has dropped dramatically.
Folks,
I finally did the calculation to decide which is safer: condoms or test kits. The results are in the safe sex section (under special interests).
Yes Joe, when you are looking at this 'in general' there is some cause for worry due to the numbers cited. However, as the prevalence of a disease (or chance thereof) increases in a population the chance of false negatives decreases.
As has been stated before, the best screening test has the highest sensitivity (lowest false negatives). There is no test that is 100% accurate (although if you look at the test numbers cited in Orasure's pamphlet, they got that but used pretty low number of test subjects). A test that is 99.9% accurate while not perfect does a pretty good job of screening out high risk candidates.
Of course this still belies the 'window' period where one could be infected by HIV and still not show antibody production (which is what the orasure test measures). Most people will seroconvert after 12 weeks. The '6 month' standard is the outside of the bell curve for positive test (some will seroconvert in as little as a few weeks).
Can someone please tell me how I can buy some Orasure test kits? I called the Company, and they told me that they will only sell their Rapid HIV Kits to Heathcare Professionals.
[quote]originally posted by joe_zop [i]i figured i should post a follow-up, since i blathered on around here with my travails earlier. when i got back home i had another bout with the same symptoms as when i was in los. went to my regular doctor, and he prescribed both the same doxy as the doc i saw in chiang mai, noting that both clamydia and a urinary tract infection were likely, took a [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] sample, and also gave me a shot for other nasties just in case. got a call today after i called to check on the sample -- a confirmed hit for gonorrea. ............... [/i][/quote]
j_z, all
i am sorry to say that i have picked up something, and i am heading for the farang doctor tomorrow. i do not feel exited about having sample pins stuck into my dick, so i was wondering: chlamydia can be detected from urin, is the same the case for gonohrea?
warning i think i picked it up aug 6 from a bbbj from a young girl in one of the ground floor open air nana beer bars. she only do bjs because she is 'sick in stomach. doctor say no boom boom 2 month'. it was first the day after she showed me some medicine (fuck me i did not write down the name) and she spelled from the thai paper goo-noo ..... i was too drunk to be intelligent, but now i have asked one of my friends to seek her up with a dictionary that contains the word in thai.
i do not want to ruin anyones business and will therefore speak no details: but if it turns out the worst, i shall have to reconsider bbbjs ...........
yes, a [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] test should be able to detect gonorrea, from what i understand. if i remember correctly that's all my doctor initially took, and drew blood only after i told him he might as well do the whole spectrum of std tests while he was at it. he said hiv was really the only one that he'd expect would come up there that wouldn't show up via [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url], since my hepatitus shots are current, and he didn't expect hiv since i was always protected for intercourse. but peace of mind is peace of mind.
and, yes, you can definitely get things via bbbjs -- i'm reasonably certain that's where my infections came from. i will probably still indulge, but perhaps not if i'm visiting one of the blow shops, as it seems logical to me that throat infections for gonorrea, which are supposed to be more rare, would be more likely for workers there than for your basic bargirl.
Joe_Zop
If you ever have had 3 cotton tipped pins poking your urin-tract, you wouldn't have forgotten.
Did you? Or was the urin sample all there was? (The needle for HIV does not scare me ,,,,,)
Nope -- I was lucky enough to avoid that both times, thankfully, as it would undoubtedly have been doubly painful in the condition I was in. Hope that's not the same with you, though I imagine it probably is -- I'm having sympathy pains just remembering.
philo,
ok..i'll admit it. i came back with "the clapper" (sounds funny, but it wasn't trust me). went to the doc's and this is what happened.
1) the doc. took a big *ucking q-tip and stuck it up my dink to do a swab..that was for gonorrea and yes..it really burns!
2) made me do a [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] test for chlamydia (since the two of them are usually present together). the [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] test after the swab was fun!
3) like joezop, i asked for the rest of the bloodword (syphillis (sp.), hep etc..
got a hit for gonorea. took 2 pills..can't remember what they were and the problem was gone. oh yea, got the "clapper" from a blow job too! won't be doing that again..too fucking risky!
Joe_Zop, Chikan, All BBBJ fans
Guess that gives me 50/50 swab or not ......
! GONORRHEA !
Guys, here is what your up to:
http://biodefence.niaid.nih.gov/factsheets/stdgon.htm
According to this site, it can infect through towels and hand-touching-body:
www.aidsarnia.org/gonn.htm
Time to get a wife? :(
GONORRHEA
through finger-sex and french kissing ?
www.laglc.org/std/STD02.6.htm
Most of the methods you're citing here are pretty unusual, as opposed to certain types, say, of hepatitis. In order for transmission by towels and the hand, it has to be a pretty immediate sequence of going from an infected area to body or from infected area to cloth to body, since the virus dies pretty quickly once exposed to air. Similarly, sex toy transmission occurs only between partners [i]sharing[/i] sex toys, which is going to keep most posters on this board in the safe zone, and there are other sites ([url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/A230716[/url] for example) that say it cannot be transmitted by kissing. My bet is that the only time that's possible is if the carrier has gonorrhea of the throat (rarer) and there's very deep french kissing to the point that the tongue touches the infected area.
I think Joe's onto something there. My doctor said that Gon. lives in the spores in the back of a girls mouth. So if she deep throats you, and she has a tiny little mouth (don't they all?), then you can get infected. I didn't ask him "So..what if she just puts the head in her mouth..could I still get it!" LOL.
As I got my test results today, detecting no clap, but an agressive fungus that I might have picked up anywhere, I feel I should remove the warning mentioning a certain girl (even if the girl was not named or otherwise easily recognizable).
(I have also learned that antibiotics against gonorhea is also used against many other infections (so that I was wrong to infer that the girl might have gonorhea because she used medication naming the disease (amongst others, I guess))).
As the original post is not editable, I quote it and WITHDRAW it here:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Philo
[i]
.........
WARNING I think i picked it up Aug 6 from a BBBJ from a young girl in one of the ground floor open air Nana beer bars. She only do BJs because she is 'sick in stomach. doctor say no boom boom 2 month'.
....... [/i][/QUOTE]
I hope the girl hasn't lost any customers because of me, and wish her Chok Dee Mak Mak in her future business ..
Not a pleasant topic to discuss, but here is my advice.
I'm a huge conusor of BBBJs. I have gotten thousands over the years from hundreds if not a thousand different WGs. I have yet to catch anything. I do take precautions. Now I'm not so naive to believe that I am invincible, or "beating the system" I know I have probably been somewhat lucky so far, I also know how to take precautions when it comes to receiving a BBBJ and here is what I do.
First I always check the girls mouth out, I don't give her a full dental exam but will often take notice to make sure she has no obvious open sores. See any cold sores you better run for the hills
Second, about 5 minutes or so before getting that BBBJ, I will drink a very large glass of water. This will mean that in about 30 minutes time, after she is done working me over, I will inevitably have to [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] like a race horse. This allows the opening on your pecker to be washed out by [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord112][CodeWord112][/url] and seriously lessons the chances for the little bugs, like gonorrhea, or others to grab hold. This is scientifically documented and is affective. Not full proof, mind you, but very affective. You should try and time it so you are pissing as soon as she is done, or very shortly afterwards.
Third, I keep a small packet of very strong alcohol wipes. You can store these in a small zip lock baggy and keep them in your pocket. I will buy regular baby type wipes and soak them in some good rubbing alcohol and then put them into a zip lock bag. I wipe off my pecker and that whole area once she is done. Sure I don't do this right in front of her, as it would be offensive, but a quick trip to the restroom, [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] and wipe. I would guess by having done these steps for years now I have probably prevented myself from catching at least a few nasty things.
Some of you may find this amusing or ridiculous, but all I can say is the proof is in the pudding. I know I probably should have caught the clap or gonorrhea by now. 13 years of mongering on almost a daily bases, or at least every other day in the states. With probably well over a thousand different girls, having given me BBBJ and still to have not caught anything using this method is proof enough for me!
Things I never do, is anal sex or any kind of fu*cking without a condom. I love doing DATY, but will NOT do it on working girls. Too much risk. I will have them lie back open their legs and massage them with both hands, one on the clit, the other inside her, but no mouth action. I usually can get most girls off this way, but I have lots of practice. Two fingers massaging the G spot another on her clit gets them off 90% of the time! DATY is bigtime risky!
HAVE FUN, BUT YES, YOU DO HAVE TO BE CAREFUL!
GETTINGTANG~!
Hi bros! This is my first post so first I wanna thank all the members for the great reports and Jackson for the work. I am going to Phuket for the first time next week and I would like to know something about the test kits you were discussing about. Do I get them in Thai pharmacies? How do they work and how reliable are they.
Which sexual practics would you rather not try with a BG in order not to get the HI virus?
Thanks for your reply and I will report when I´m back!
Bottom line is simple -- condom equals no HIV. No real worries with BBBJ about HIV, though as we've discussed you can get some other nasties that way. I don't care how good the kits are, as I've never used them, but going bareback is still the main risky behavior -- even if the TG tests negative for HIV, such a kit doesn't guarantee no hepatitis, syph, clap, herpes, etc.
"I keep a small packet of very strong alcohol wipes. You can store these in a small zip lock baggy and keep them in your pocket. I will buy regular baby type wipes and soak them in some good rubbing alcohol and then put them into a zip lock bag. I wipe off my pecker and that whole area once she is done." Getting Tang
GT,
I also clean my whole pelvic area with alcohol wipes after any kind of action. Herpes can be caught through the skin, condom or no condom, so its a precaution against that.
As far as the gonorrhea, the clap etc are concerned, I always use a condom for BJ and FS so I never have to worry.
0C
Tang,
Great advice, especially the portable alcohol wipes. Hadn't thought of that, but will certainly become a staple now.
Anybody have any DATY tips (no, not HOW to do it, lol) for safety - I've heard of using a dental dam or saran wrap, but haven't tried either. Both sort squash the GFE mood, I'm guessing. I'm an eatin' kind of guy, but really don't want to take extra risks while mongering.
MM
GettingTang
Do you wear any kind of gloves when masturbate her ?
Since everybody has countless unnoticed microscopic small wounds at the fingers you should be aware that the way you practice it comes close to do it with your pecker without a condom.
Have fun
Traveler be real.
First people do not have "countless" microscopic cuts on your fingers. Cuts on ones fingers that might be that small heal and close to outside expose extremely quick.
The penis is lined with very thin skin and the blood vessels are extremely close to the surface. The head of the penis also has something fingers don't. It's called a urethra. It's your dick head opening, [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] hole. The inner lining on the tip of you dick is an open source right into your blood stream! Much different then using your fingers. Now sure, I would not go sticking my finger up inside a girls snatch with an open cut, but please, lets be realistic. Barring an open and noticeable wound on your fingers, the likelihood of HIV transmission from fingering a girl is non existent.
DATY in my opinion is dangerous. The mouth is a very fragile place on the human body. It bleeds more regularly then any other location on the body. gums are also very thinly lined with blood vessels close to the surface. The tongue can also act as I direct link and be absorbent much like the urethra of the penis. It can go right into ones blood stream. For this reason, I never perform DATY on any working girl. I have also decided to keep my BJs covered. As recent data is now suggesting, HIV can more easily be transmitted this way then previously had been thought.
I always assume there are some girls out there who might actually intentionally try and transmit you the virus, due to being enraged about their own infection. They view you, the monger, as the reason why they are infected. I have seen it before and it is real. It's a dangerous world out there, one must protect themselves and be careful.
GETTINGTANG~!
GettingTang
I don't want to start a discussion about this. Do as you like.
But you have to admit, that manicure e.g. - and I guess you do it on a regular basis - produces small wounds of your skin when you remove it (at the bottom of your fingernails). Furthermore I had cut my hands a thousand times at a sheet of paper or somewhere else without even knowing it. Just saw it later on.
Sure, wounds will close, but do you check your hands every time before masturbating a girl ? Furthermore you are mentioning that the skin is thinner at certain parts of a body, so do you agree that the skin will also be thinner at a freshly closed wound of any size ?
If you doubt what I say, why not ask a doc who is specialied in HIV. He/she should know if this is a possibility for transmission.
Have fun
but be careful
GettingTang
One more suggestion :
Would you touch a positive HIV blood sample with your bare hands, no gloves ?
Due to your comments, you will, since your skin is protection enough.
If not, please tell me how you make sure that your chick doesn't got her period (asking her, uh ?) or that your fingernails won't hurt her inside. Maybe she already got a small wound from her last bonk some 30 mins ago or from some deep penetration.
You better be real.
Think about it
Pardon my ignorance guys, but I've been told that the HIV/AIDS problem in Thailand is now well under control. Apparently the Phillipines is the next hotspot for the virus. The Fillipinos are staunch Catholics and their bishops actively lobby for people not to use condoms. A couple of my friends take the chance going bareback in Thailand these days, but a lot of the girls usually turn them down. I think the message has got across to the majority of women in Thailand that sex w/o a condom is a big no-no. Having said that our experiences come only from Phuket and Hatyai. I'm not sure what the situation is in Bangkok. As I told my friends, all it takes is a little bad luck and, BANG, your life is over. Still they don't listen. Their lives I guess.
Ok Team,
Listen up, Remember Thailand is one of the Aids capitals of te world.Noone can give us an accurate report on all bar girls. Even if aids died down. It only takes one poison pill to ruin your life. These girls are with maybe 5 different guys a day. When you go to thailand how you look makes a difference with how much you pay and what you can do to the girl. I was in Thailand in October and was with probally 25 girls. I would say with about 20 of them if I went bareback they would not care. I even tested and teased them and they had no problem with this. I of course would never go BB in Thailand. I am a young guy and I do believe alot of them were attracted to me. But you never know what to believe in Thailand. I think if you are not that attractive girls will not want BB. If your cute enough you can seduce it out of them just like any girl. When I was in Thailand I would pass up maybe 300 girls to find just the one I want. I noticed many guys take the first girl that looks at them. I was also shocked that guys will sleep with these woman no matter how unhealthy they look. BB blowjobs are extremely dangerous. I had friends that ran into alot of problems. Becareful guys so this trip is not your last trip.
In the news today:
(At first I wanted to post this in the General section, but I've got the feeling it belongs here, in the Safe Sex department:).)
Sex and jealousy
A 21-year-old man and four teenagers were arrested in Din Daeng district after a quarrel in which they hurt a 52-year-old woman they had sex with.
Din Daeng police on Friday nabbed Thawatchai Cheuychan, 21, and four teenagers aged 15-17 (names withheld) in a rented room in Soi Pracha Songkhroh 27 after they quarrelled and caused injury to Ratri (surname withheld), 52, early Friday morning.
Police said Mr Thawatchai had sex with Mrs Ratri, his girlfriend, and allowed the four teenagers to join in, but he later became angry and jealous. Mr Thawatchai hit his girlfriend and the last boy, 15, on their heads while they were having sex.
The teenagers had yet to be questioned by police in the presence of prosecutors, social welfare officials and parents.
With all due respect, ChiMan II, I think you're dramatically overstating things by calling Thailand "one of the AIDS capitals of the world" and that is a rather dated perspective. The HIV infection rate in Thailand, according to UNAIDS 2002 statistics, is 1.8%. It's worth noting that only a third of the adults infected are women. The overall infection rate of sex workers in urban areas is 6.7% (much higher in rural areas, so Freeler et all, en garde!) which compares very well with lots of other countries where stats are available. Most HIV infections in Thailand these days are coming from infected male Thais having unprotected sex with their regular partners, usually wives or gay men.
Compare this to say, the Central African Republic, which has an infection rate of 12.9%, Kenya, (15% rate, 27% among sex workers) Benin, (3.6% rate, 40% infection rate for sex workers) Cambodia, (2.7% rate, 26% infection rate for sex workers) Haiti, (6.1%) the Dominican Republic, (2.5%, though lower than LOS among sex workers -- about 4%) or the Bahamas (3.5% overall rate.) Even Brazil and China, which have a lower overall rate, still have substantially higher rates for sex workers -- over 17% and 10% respectively. And there are others in Africa which are far, far worse. (All stats from the above source.)
The truth is that a monger is generally at far more risk going anywhere in Africa or to most places in the Caribbean than to Thailand. While no one can give a girl-by-girl report, one can get a pretty solid sense of things by looking at the rates listed at [url]http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/Map11table.html[/url] (current as of June) which breaks down the HIV infection rate of Thai sex workers by city. For example the HIV infection rate among sex workers in Bangkok is 2.6%, Chiang Mai 8.7%, Phuket 9.25%, Philok (for Freeler and Skinless) at 7%, Korat 4.6%, and Pattaya at a bit over 11%. This is at least a bit of an argument for mongering in the Big Durian!
Obviously, I'm hardly advocating bareback, as that's still risky idea, but let's at least keep the facts in mind.
Joe_zop,
"The overall infection rate of sex workers in urban areas is 6.7% Freeler et all, en garde!"
Et all?
Another little joke, I presume.
And you know damn well I always cover up.
Lots of towns near BKK have very high rates of infection, as do cities in the South (muslim...) and the North-West (tribal areas...).
Am I glad I didn't stick my privat parts in any one up in Phrea... 82%hiv-infected!!!???
Yes, two little jokes as of course I know you always play it safe, and you've lamented before the lack of adventuresome mongers who head out and explore. I doubt such stats will encourage that, unfortunately. And absolutely, Phrae seems like the place to avoid, (along with Nan) though you gotta suspect a rather small sample there, don't you think?
Joe et al: I don't think these figures mean very much at all. The level of education/knowledge about STDs is very low and doubt has to be placed on all surveys/samples involving the ladies of the night and semi literates (and sad mongers like all of us). My experience is most hos (and mongers) will take the chance to go skinless. The Thai government has a vested interest to pretend HIV rates are lower than what they are. Although there is a thriving gay/bisexual/IV drug use culture, caution is still advised. Pattaya and similar places have to be major HIV/STD reservoirs: just look at all the commercial bonking going on there. Also, what puts Phrae up in the top league infection wise? Is there something different in the air or dicks there?
Vested interests, academic and otherwise, have been doing these bs HIV surveys for a long time now. There is little new, novel or informative in them.
Us tourists are very much needed to help the Thai economy. If the sex industry dies down because of an AIDS scare this will hurt Thailand economy severly. It is in the goverments best interests to cover things up and try to keep things on the up and up. From my experience Thai woman worry more about money than STDS. People that experience Thailand will tell you it is no holds barred. It is just better to go there with the mind frame Aids is very big here. If you go there with the mind frame Thailand doesn't have that much std's then you are more likely to take chances and risks. How many places can you sit down at a bar and the girl begs you to pay her bar fine and sleep with her?
Points taken, Skinless, but at the same time most of these stats from Thailand these days come from hospital testing, and there's been a huge amount of work in LOS on testing -- I remember reading about several researchers there who were working hard on really, really inexpensive and reliable kits. The overall number of those infected does appear to have gone down in Thailand, partly because there's been a massive amount of deaths in recent years. (And the rates of new infections appear to be rising slightly in the last couple of years, though not among sex workers.)
I'd say the high rates in Phrae (and Nan, etc.) make a lot of sense, given that the rates have always been higher in the north, and brothel workers have also tended to be higher. And while there's a lot of commercial bonking going on, let's face it, most western mongers actually are condom-conscious for the most part. The existence of this thread is testimony to that.
I absolutely agree with you that many, if not most, sex workers will go skinless. We obviously all need to at least presume this to be the case for our own safety.
And can you name me [i]anything[/i] in the world that doesn't have a vested interest? We've all got to take our information from somewhere or another, and UNAIDS and the Census Bureau are at least not completely fly-by-night.
Joe: Was the fact that brothel owners in the 80% infected areas did not pay their bribes on time a factor?
Skinless,
Ha Ha, I liked your report. I agree with you 100%. In my opinion what makes Thailand so dangerous is this. You meet a beautiful girl. She tells you everything you want to hear. She does not at all seem like a hooker which throws you off guard. You spend your evening drinking with her. Some of these girls are so sweet and full of love you actually start to like this girl. She looks at you with those beautiful eyes and that sexy smile. She just got out of the shower and she smells like soap. She smells so clean and she is only 18 she probally hasn't been withthat many people, lol. So you think. Plus, 95% of the men with them are drunk from drinking all night. Alot of these guys are not good looking and never had an experience with such a beautiful sweet girl. No girl this hot ever paid so much attention to them. Do you really think the average drunk joe will care to put a condom on? Everyone agrees that to go bareback with the girls is not a problem. So you do the math. Thailand is paradise but it is also an illusion. It would be nice thought that all these drunk guys would not like to cum in these angels. This will not stop me from going to Thailand every year but I am just extra careful.
Chiman,
In fact a great many Thai girls do insist on condoms. I should know as I prefer to go without. I've had several girls walk out unpaid rather than go bareback. True, many will aquiesce to a request for bareback, but most try to persuade the customer to use a condom, and quite a few refuse condomless sex entirely. Not that this means much to your debate - I'd agree that some paid sex in Thailand is covered, some isn't - but my point is that as often as not its the Thai girl who's pushing the condom, not the customer. Of course I only do short-time so maybe if you like to take the girls overnight they're more cooperative.
[i]Everyone agrees that to go bareback with the girls is not a problem. [/i]
I've not heard that said by anyone here, regardless of belief about the actual HIV/AIDS rate. Skinless and I have both confessed to catching STDs in LOS. If you're hearing that going condomless is safe, then it's time to hang out with different "everyones."
Joe Zop,
I think what was meant is "to go bareback is not difficult to get if you want".
Let's have it repeated once again: unprotected sex is dangerous, even more so with a paid sex provider.
STDs happen that way, and so do unwanted pregnancies (a much underrated psychological misery endured by many Farangs).
This being said, TGs have a carefree if not careless attitude about pretty much everything in life. That is part of their Thainess. This includes a relatively low importance given to any precaution, including condoms.
Never count on the lady to enforce safe sex practices; In Thailand, she might not do it, or no consistently. (Consistency is another dirty word in Thai).
hey gang,
when i said we all agree getting bareback is not a problem i meant getting it. i did not mean it is safe. getting it though depends on what you look like. if the thai girl likes you and or is attracted to you it is very possible. if you are overweight or not attractive to the thai girl i think it will be harder. thai women do what they want as long as they are having fun. i would like to ask opebo a question. o**** did you ever catch any std's or have any negative experiences to share with us about going bareback? i would like a section added to the forum about negative experiences with std's to the forum. i think it would save lives. i will share one. i went to a san francisco massage palor. a nice 26 year old vitnam girl gave me a bareback blowjob. the following day i broke out in white hives all over my body. i went to the doctor and he asked my if i been to asia? anyway, he gave me a shot and i was better in two days. that was the last time i ever got a bareback blow from a working girl.
I have a question about anal sex with Thai girls. What percent of the time do the girls bleed? I wouldn't enjoy the experience of blood everywhere. Anyone with experiences I would like to hear.
Thanks
chiman ii
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
what percent of the time do the girls bleed?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i guess you are not talking about their period.
why should they bleed at all ?
use lots of ky jelly or another lubricant, go soft and slow and everything will be fine. the hardest part is to convince them that you won't hurt them, cause most of them already tried or want to try it, but had bad experiences or heard many negative comments from friends. too many men seem not to care about the girls feelings and what they scare.
so again, soft and slow with lots of lubricant, you might speed up later on if you and she ! likes.it
have fun
Amen, and jeez, c'mon already -- we're not talking about some weird species just because they're Thais, we're talking about women! If they're bleeding during anal sex you're doing something wrong! (And if the woman is bleeding she's probably the next one telling her friends what a negative experience it is.)
I swear, (and I'm sorry ChiMan II, as I'm not intending to pick on just you) sometimes posts here sound like they're coming from people who have never had sex in their entire lives.
Chiman II,
I have a lot of anal sex with Thai girls. I try to only take girls that will provide this service. In my experience they rarely bleed if you use lots of KY. The few occasions that I noticed bleeding or a bit of uncleanliness were usually when I got extremely deep and rough. But then again plenty of girls can take this and there's nothing but KY to be seen. Another poster made the point that there's no big physical difference between Thais and other women. Just like everywhere, most won't do it, and out of the few that do, only a minority can really take it the way it was meant to be done.
More apropos the 'safe sex in Thailand' angle - I admit that as a confirmed barebacker the bleeding issue is one of concern. Personally in the 90% of cases where there's no bleeding at all I consider anal sex with copious amounts of KY to be safer than vaginal - none of her juices involved.
Hi Joe,
It is not uncommon at all for women to bleed during anal sex. I had two girlfriends that had this problem when we tried it. I haven't had alot of girls that were up for this so maybe I am wrong? I am still researching. ha ha
ChiMan II
I am with Joe Zop, if the girl declines, DO NOT try to force her. DO NOT try to do it if she is not relaxed. And again, soft, slow and lots of KY jelly.
I am also Opebo, I can hardly remember any case when a girl was bleeding. Give her time to relax and everything will be fine. Take your time, no need to rush.
Have fun
Maybe it's the approach, Opebo and ChiMan, but I've had a fair amount of anal, and I've absolutely never had a woman bleed from it. I don't tend to be rough at all, (though with some women who are relaxed and experienced going deep and hard is fine) since I'm well aware it can cause damage and I've no desire to do that to someone who's giving me something so many others decline to do. I don't simply cornhole a woman who's willing but inexperienced without a substantial amount of preparation. Not to mention the fact that causing bleeding means everything goes up on the safe sex risk-meter.
Opebo, sorry, but you're in fool's paradise if you're going bareback anal, which I'm sure you really know and obviously just don't much care about. (The good old "can't happen to me" syndrome.) There's absolutely no evidence I'm aware of that "copious amounts of KY" does anything to prevent infection other than cutting down on bleeding -- sacrificing a chicken probably has about the same preventive effect in terms of keeping infection from entering via the tip of your cock when your partner is bleeding despite the lube. The woman's secretions have nothing to do with it when you're talking HIV: it's about the blood, and that 10% of the time, according to your own estimate, that there's bleeding, is simply exposure-city for you. Do us all a favor and post pics of the girls you're having bareback anal with, so we can avoid them.
FWIW, I tend to like Astrolube rather than KY, as I find it both more slippery, easier to apply, and more dependable. It is also simply handy to have around for regular sex.
Hi Guys,
I just had to jump in on this safe anal sex and bleeding discussion.
There is no safe unprotected anal sex. Period. Regardless of how much lubrication you use there is going to be some bleeding in almost 100% of all cases.
The anus is lined with extremely delicate blood vessels. Even the slightest penetration will cause these to break. You may not notice any blood but trust me there will be small microscopic tears in the anal lining which make a perfect conduit for transmitting the virus. This is why the virus spread so fast through the gay community.
Opebo, Can I possibly interest you in a safer hobby, say perhaps Russian Roulette with only a couple of bullets in the chamber? Get real dude. Most 5-year-olds in the year 2003 know that unprotected anal sex with a Thai hooker is attempted suicide. But hey, I'm not here to preach, just inform.
Live Long and Prosper,
Civ2000
I'll like to second (or third) the comments about lubrication and going real slow to start, especially with a girl who is new at it.
A sure way of making it certain that the girl does not get into anal is to make it hurt.
To me, nothing is better than a chick who 'enjoys' anal (yes, they are out there!).
Vaginal lining = very thick = less tears
anal lining = very thin = frequent tears
You don't have see blood to be exposed
Having said all this:
How do you "find and confirm" ( or ask) whether the girl will do anal (other than that infamous yellow line):
BJ = smoke
BBBJ = ??
Anal = ??
CIM = ??
Can these be had from any of the go gos or bars? Any differences between BKK and Pattaya with regards to above services?
JZ,
Please check your PM.
Joe Zop, Civ2000,
You're quite wrong about anal being riskier than vaginal for the penetrator. The higher risk is for the receptive partner. Hiv is found in vaginal secretions as well as blood and semen. Its also worth remembering that in most hiv positive people - those who are in the long 'dormant' stage between initial infection and aids - have very low levels of hiv in any of these bodily fluids.
As for the KY issue - I'm only going by a spate of news articles I read a few months ago about studies showing that KY and the like 'killed hiv'. The studies suggested that water-based lubricatants were an environment that was not easy for hiv to live in or pass through.
Lastly, circumsizion makes one much less pervious to hiv infection. Considering all these factors, I'm not in the least worried.
I have 2 questions I hope someone can answer.
1. Is there a HIV test kit sold in Bangkok that gives results in 30 minutes or is that a bad rumor.
2. Can anyone recommoned a good STD clinic in Bangkok what are the prices for tests.
Opebo,
"The studies suggested that water-based lubricatants were an environment that was not easy for hiv to live in or pass through."
This seems a bit odd to me. The human body is about 80% water and HIV loves it...
Everybody just rubber up, ok?
Well, Opebo, your logic is non-existent here. Whether the risk is higher for the receptive partner or the penetrator isn't really the point -- the point is that according to your own statement the women you're cornholing are bleeding 10% of the time. Blood, whether in the ass or pussy, puts [i]you[/i] at risk. Yes, they're more at risk (much more, based on your behavior, which greatly increases their chances of catching anything you have) than you are. Women are [i]always[/i] more at risk for STDs, regardless of the type or activity, than are men. Again, that's not really the issue here. (But I can point you to any number or citations that say that the single riskiest behavior is unprotected anal sex.)
Please cite a concrete source for the statement about lube, and I'll be happy to believe you. I have read extensively on this subject, and just did a web search as well. I've seen or found absolutely nothing that claims that water-based lubes, and in particular KY, manage to kill HIV. Everything I've seens talks about these lubes in combination with condoms. Now, some lubes might contain Nonoxynol-9, which does directly kill HIV, but KY does not. And the studies now considered authoritative say Nonoxynol-9 causes irritation, and thereby increases rather than decreases the risks of infection.
There's not a single authority that I'm aware of that says you're safe barebacking using your approach, so you may not be worried, but you're hardly safe. The percentages I've seen cited say that the risk of HIV transmission to a receiver during unprotected anal sex is 15 in 1,000 versus 3 in 10,000 from a receiver to a penetrator. Those might be fine odds for you, but they're not for me.
Joe Zop, Freeler
Ever heard the phrase, "like talking to a dead man"? Sadly, I fear that speaking to Opebo fits all too aptly.
Tatoosh
o****, no one here ever said that hiv doesn't exist in vaginal secretions. i wouldn't have unprotected vaginal sex without a condom either. but there is always blood contact in anal sex which does make it riskier. you make it sound like there is no risk of a man contracting hiv. tell that to magic johnson and the countless number of straight men who have contracted hiv. heck, if i can bareback anal a sw, then what can't i do? i cringe when i hear comments like yours. the world and all responsible mongers are trying hard to stem diseases like hiv, syphilis, and others and then you have guys like your self spreading disease and mis-information. i like joe zop's idea of having you post the pictures of the gals you've barebacked so we can avoid them. in fact, read joe's most recent report. he's obviously someone who has done his homework and knows what he's talking about.
civ2k
"Regardless of how much lubrication you use there is going to be some bleeding in almost 100% of all cases."
I've had anal sex at least 400-500 times. Have yet to see a drop of blood. If a woman is visibly bleeding, you are doing something wrong.
"Lastly, circumsizion makes one much less pervious to hiv infection"
Really? And where does this little nugget of wisdom come from?
Hi there,
I am a newcomer to the scene. I have been with pros in Canada and always try to get daty with them. It works about 30 percent of the time. What are the risks or doing this in Thailand? I have recently tested for all std's and came clean. This is after years of "swinging" bareback activity in Canada (dp's and all). I feel blessed to have come out of that era without a disease. I am into covering up for all activities except oral both ways. Is there much of a risk with Thai? and Viet and Cambodians? I am also into rimming them. Thoughts?
[size=-2][u]EDITOR's NOTE[/u]: [blue]Posting of this report was delayed pending revisions to [u]remove the multiple periods at the ends of sentences[/u]. To avoid future delays, please use just one period followed by a space at the end of sentences in future reports. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue][/size]
Ok, I'll respond, though I think there's no settling this type of argument - we just have different priorities
Joe Zop -
I think the distinction between you and I is our definition of 'safe' - you mentioned a 3 in 10,000 chance. I have no idea if that is accurate but it sounds very low-risk to me. Some people look for gaurantees in life, others just for good odds. I'm one of the latter. I drive a motorbike in Thailand and consider that much higher risk (and less fun) than bareback sex. What clinches it is that for me condom-sex is really in no way enjoyable or preferable to staying home and masturbating.
On the lube issue - yes nonoxonol-9 is bad news, I know. Have never used it. But plain water-based lubes do greatly reduce the risk. This type of web search is difficult because one gets literally thousands of sites containing instructions about the use of 'water based lubricants' with 'condoms' - just the standard line. I could only find one reference -
http://www.google.co.th/search?q=cache:LK2H4jK6BAcJ:www.salon.com/sex/feature/2002/01/16/lubes_hiv/+hiv+study+transmission+%22lubricants+can+prevent+%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
I remember the things I read previously (on Yahoo News I believe) seemed to attribute the beneficial effect to water based lubes in general - this article stresses the preferability of Astroglide and a couple of others. Anyway, take it for what its worth. I mainly use them to reduce potential for abrasion and the risks that entails.
Civ1000-
Why do you want pictures of the girls I've barebacked? If you're practising 'safe' sex then it shouldn't matter if the girl you're with has taken risks or has something. I imagine the vast majority of them have taken lots of risks, and not with me - rather with Thai boyfriends who are a lot more likely to give them something than I or any monger. Relax, you're at no risk at all with your condoms, either of getting anything or having any first-rate sex.
Nailr - Check the posts below for this subject. In summary, the answer is NO; it is NOT safe to be engaging in condomless sex (oral or not) with these women or for you to be eating them out! The Clap is apparantly quite rampant in BKK and Pattaya and why stick your tongue somewhere where 15 mins. previous some guy shot his wad in her?
Don't ruin a holiday because of a few moments of stupidity and / or drunkness. Wrap that willy! Play safe and stay safe! Cheers!
PS. Even up here in Canada, you're taking quite a risk engaging in that activity with them....good you got tested and you're ok.
Nailr,
I have two very good friends who now have a herpies of the mouth because of eating hookers out. But have fun anyways and let us know what happens.
Chikan,
Thanks for the advice, though it really it isn't what I want to hear. You are right about covering up at all times and most likely I'll try to refrain from daty, we'll see. I have read some of the reports on this subject and am shocked to see guys on here who will have anal sex with these girls uncovered. It doesn't take a genius to know that's suicide, of perticular was one poster who said some very sadistic things about making them bleed. That made me sick.
I can tell all of you that I've never seen such a dummy like Opebo or similar guys. This guy is too much, his logic is like a ten-year old kid who has no knowledge whatsoever about how bad the AIDS epidemic is. He is now going around spreading his infected semen to poor girls in third world countries. He doesn't think about the welfare of these human beings and thus showing how cruel he is! Hey be mature! Man, how I despise him.
Nailr,
Your dilemna reminds me of something a good friend said to me long ago, which is: "If I'm going to get HIV from eating pussy, then I'm going to get HIV from eating pussy." In other words, NOTHING was going to stop him from his favorite activity - DATY. All I can say is I wish you the best of luck in your resolve to refrain from DATY. I am also a huge fan of the activity, and I simply do not have the discipline to keep from doing it, even when I know it's not a good idea. I will ALWAYS wrap up for the main event- that goes without saying - but I simply find it impossible not to go down on a girl who really turns me on, hooker or not. I can't resist it. I love it that much.
BLEEEEECH! I would rather lick the toilet! LOL
I know you can't get hiv from oral sex, unless you are a vampire, but this Thailand not Romania so I'm not worried. It's a blood exchange that causes it. So, maybe I will get the klap, but that is also rare for oral. My first trip abroad and you are right, if the chick is hot nothing will stop me from tasting that sweet ass and pussy, escpecially if I am wrecked.
I've had a klamidia test before and have friends in Canada who have had it, it's not so bad. Some antibodies and you'll be fine. I don't think I would be able to help myself. I'll always have the girls take a shower before, with me doing the cleaning. To get rid of the flavour of nations. Burning [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] for a month is acceptable to satisfying my desire for an insatiable 2 weeks.
"Kiss a toilet". That's not too far from the truth when you think about the fluids and bacteria. Except one is a sensual and beautiful humanbeing and the other is pure pourcilan, in Canada anyways. The UN says we have the best toilets in the world.
ChiManII,
That is actually the one thing that scares me...herpes.
i have 2 questions i hope someone can answer.
1. is there a hiv test kit sold in bangkok that gives results in 30 minutes or is that a bad rumor.
2. can anyone recommoned a good std clinic in bangkok what are the prices for tests.
o****,
do not underestimate the effects of herpes, syphillis gonerrea in the practice of bareback bangin it is best if you settle in with one girl otherwise do the right thing wrap it up. do it for the girl. do it for the community. most of all do it for yourself.
Opebo, I agree there's no settling the argument, though I'd say part of that is because if someone simply chooses to ignore all the best medical advice and insist something is safe, it's not really an exchange of information that can lead to changes in points of view, it's an expression of a faith or pure belief. To me, a 1 in 3300 chance is a pretty lousy one -- I've certainly had more sex than that, which would mean the odds are I'd be infected.
As for the motorcycle argument, well, duh! The odds even in the US are about 1.5 in a hundred that you'll be in an accident in any given year riding a motorcycle -- and Thailand has pretty much the highest accident rate in the world. That's hardly a worthwhile comparison -- though I'd frankly rather go through a cycle accident than AIDS, thank you very much.
Still, to use your comparison, I'd say the point is really simply this -- you can radically reduce your odds of being in a fatal cycle accident by wearing a helmet. Same same with HIV/AIDS. You call not doing either an acceptable risk, fine for you. I call it being unnecessarily irresponsible, and putting other people at risk.
As far as the photos go, it's very simple -- I'd avoid the girls you've been with as they clearly engage in higher-risk activity, and therefore are more likely to have caught something. Condoms break, shit happens, and if you're dealing with someone who engages in safe sex you improve your odds considerably simply because the odds go down that they've got any STDs. Since there are so many TGs who are available, I'd simply choose to choose someone else. Doesn't keep me from getting laid or having my fun, just means I've got less to worry about.
Since you're an adult it's your right to take whatever risks you want. I wish you absolutely nothing but luck, because apparently that's the only thing keeping you safe so far!
Joe Zop,
I find this discussion of probabilities fun. Lets say the likelyhood is 1 in 3300 - about .0003. And lets say 25% of TGs are infected - probably wildly high.
.0003 X .25 gives us .000075 per sex act.
Assuming one sex act per day on average, and say 4 months per year in Thailand gives us 120 sex acts per annum.
.000075 X 120 = .009 annual risk. (or .9%).
So let say I'm the typical 40 year old hobbyist. How many years do I have left. Well, 100% certainty is 1.0 so 1.0 = .009(x)
1.0/.009 = about 111 years till 100% risk, or 'certainty'. Tack on another four years for it to do you in, and this 40 year old high-stakes gambler of a hobbyist is cutting life short to a mere 151 years. Sad really. Why couldn't he 'act responsibly'?
Of course I actually know almost nothing about math so I would welcome input from anyone who does. My 'common sense' reaction to odds or probability is that they 'reset' with each winning hand. For example if this hypothetical 40 year old hobbyist has lucked out up till now, his risk is back to .0003 with that next sex act on his 41st birthday. That would actually reduce the risk - I believe if anything the above analysis overstates it.
Anyway, a more apt comparison wouldn't be wearing a motorcycle helmet but say never leaving one's house or avoiding showers for fear of slipping on the soap - 'safe sex' is that absurd.
Under what logic do you think the odds "reset" after each act? That might works for straight probability on coin flips, but I don't see how its application is relevant here.
Here's another way of looking at your "logic" using precisely your same mathematical approach: at any given point, there are probably well over 3300 mongers in Pattaya alone. (Let's just use that number cause it works easily; it's probably low, and there are certainly other places than Pattaya.) The most recent HIV infection rate reported in for sex workers in Pattaya is 11%. If all of those mongers are barebacking, then there's a 11% chance on any given day that one of them is getting infected. That means over forty would be getting infected each year. If I want to look at it in the opposite direction, and presume that 1% of all these barebackers are HIV positive, that would mean (according to the 1 in 50 rate for receivers) that about 20 sex workers would be infected each month by those 3300 mongers, or well over 200 in a year.
Somehow, looking at it that way, I don't find your dismissal of safe sex all that comforting. The bottom line in LOS is that it was the increase in condom use -- not any other change in behavior -- that was responsible for radically reducing the climbing rate of HIV infection during the 90s. A similar process seems to be occuring in Cambodia as a result of government campaigns there. I challenge you to find any even quasi-authoritative alternate explanation for that.
Globo:Get checked at at Bumassgrad Hosital on Soi 3. Very good, complete STI checks. Lots of STIs in Thailand - told that by the doctor at the hospital. And as both Joe Zop and John Skinless are purple hearts (wounded, or diseased in action) we cna speak from bitter experience. My name is John Skinless but I know I am playing a crazy game. Just be careful about all the bareback propaganda: the problem with the Intenret is it is too easy to post dangeroulsy misleading bs.
Opebo
I wonder if your theory on probability is correct. If it is then I suggest you look at the way you "play" in a different light.
Perhaps this might help:
If 11% of sex workers are infected with HIV (we discount all other diseases here for the moment even though there are over 8+ STD's you can catch!) and this means that for every 10 girls you bearback more than one will be HIV positive!
If a girl said to you, "I am HIV pos and would like you to fuck me in the ass bear back" would you still do it?
Ignorance is bliss huh?
By the way, "when" you do catch HIV and develop Aids, will you tell us on this site? Then, by using your own theory of relativity seen in earlier posts, at least we can accuse you of BB riding some rent boy and being a screaming homosexual!
In any case its your life, do what you want.
Joe Zop,
Good points about receptive partners - for example sex workers in Pattaya. For them the risk is high enough that condom use is probably worthwhile - especially since for them there is no downside as they're not doing the sex for enjoyment, and condoms only rob the penetrator of pleasure. For me however there is a huge downside, namely total lack of enjoyment or senstation. Of course the reason prostitutes go without condoms is that some of their customers, like me, would decline to purchase their services under those terms. Thank god for the 'pay after' norm!
Swiss Tiger,
Thanks for the reassuring statistic - only 11% eh? I was assuming 25%. And yes, I've buttfucked a few girls - freelancers on Sukhumvit or Beach Road - that I figured almost had to be positive, if anyone was. I mean we're talking doing it multiple times per day porno gapers here (just my cup of tea).
Freeler,
Nothing new in your post - you just changed the estimated risk factor. Of course none of us knows exactly what it is. I never said the risk wasn't lower for the condom user - of course its lower. In fact its infinitismal. But the catch is that sort of sex is not worth having at all, much less traveling across the world for and paying. My own hand feels better than that nonsense! And ultimately my risk is so low I'll have fun sex all my life and never get it, and you'll have mediocre sex all your life, and also never get it. Probably the only difference will be a few cases of clamydia and gonorrhea.
Joe Zop,
I really do not know about the HIV infection rate in Thailand now, whether it is actually raising slower or decreasing, and whether that most welcome change can be attributed to a more widespread use of condoms.
As far as I suspect (and no, I do not have official figures at my fingertip to prove that), the use of condoms in the general Thai population is still not widespread.
It is true that government agencies have done much to promote safer sex practices and healthier behaviors in general. How much of that has had an impact in actual cases of infection is not obvious to me.
In the area of factors having a favourable impact on public health, you could also cite the War on Drugs that the Thaksin administration is so famous for.
I would not put too much trust in anything Thai authorities do or say they do, or any success they claim. They have limited resources and skills available in that field, and they are not above putting forward unsubstanciated numbers.
As for Cambodia, it is actually far worse in that (and most other) respect.
Always the sceptic.
And as you know, Seydlitz, I have full respect for your skepticism, and I certainly know the Thai government is hardly known for its stone-cold accuracy (such as its pronouncement this month that 90% of the drug trade has been "eliminated" by its recent bloody tactics. See, for example, its past pronouncements about there being utterly no terrorists in the country.) I rather doubt you can credit the "war on drugs" as having a substantial impact as of yet, since it's a very recent phenomenon, and its effects would not be showing up in statistics for a while. The most current reports I've read on the HIV rate (earlier this year) say that it's been starting to rise again -- though not among sex workers except for some in rural areas - but I fully agree that any such information needs to taken with large grains of salt. I know your perspective on what can or cannot be credited as an AIDS infection or death, per earlier conversations in this thread, but I will still go by the defined stats in the absence of anyone supplying something better to work with. To me, having statistics one acknowledges might be off to some degree is still better than having none at all.
While it's true that condom use among the general population in LOS probably hasn't risen all that much, there's absolutely no question that the usage among sex workers has risen dramatically in the last decade, and since there's been a corresponding slowing in the spread of HIV during that period, it's at least a reasonable conclusion that there's a connection. As I said to Opebo, if there's another valid explanation, I'd love to hear it.
Joe Zop:
I guess there is little benefit in debating on this: increase in condom use is a good thing, the general health is improving, and the dreadful indicator (HIV infection) goes in the right direction.
Let's not spoil that warm feeling by suspecting God knows what inaccuracy ...
Joe_zop, Seydlitz,
I saw plenty condomvendingmachines, B5 per condom, in Isaan last summer.
Every pro I was with had her own supply of rubbers, and I saw Navy boys showing their rubbers to other navy boys on the bus.
'Sai tum' was probably the phrase I heard the most!
Those are very good signs.
Opebo,
I tried to edit the post you are referring to, but I accidently deleted it, an old habbit:). I planned to spice it up a bit, but reading your reply it would have been a total waste of time.
If the girls you choose can't give you the real feeling because of condoms, choose better!
But hey, if your sex is to die for, I prefer sex to live for.
Opebo, ah, now we've gotten to the crux of the matter -- it really doesn't matter to you what the risk factors happen to be because it's all about maximum sensation. Fair enough, if that's your decision, and I will of course admit there is some degree of diminishing of sensation wearing condoms, though the newer ultra thin ones do help in that regard. I don't happen to agree that it means total lack of sensation -- I've gotten tons of enjoyment out of sex with a rubber, and that slight decrease of sensation also means I can go on forever.
But the bottom line is that there's a big difference between going around and saying, "I don't really care -- I want it to feel this way regardless of the consequences" and saying, "My behavior really isn't risky." If you want to be a daredevil and aren't doing anything illegal, then it's your choice, but telling people it's always ok to jump from the top of a building because it's fun and because you personally have always landed in water is simply misleading and irresponsible.
Well said, Freeler, as always, and that's good news on Issan.
Joe,
jumping from the top of a building kinda hurt every time, even if landing in water. Ouch !
Joe Zop,
Jumping from a building is not an apt comparison since the risk is so small compared to that. Yes, sensation matters, but the reason it is worth the risk is only partially because sensation is a value - it is also because the risk is so tiny. So I stand by the statement 'My behavior isn't really risky', because the risk is statistically so remote that concern about it is a absurd. I might as well waste my time worrying about slipping in the shower.
Seydlitz,
Though I have nothing new to contribute on the rather low hiv prevalency rates in Thailand and Cambodia, here's a very recent article about the dubious nature of the African statistics -
http://www.spectator.co.uk/article.php3?table=old§ion=current&issue=2003-12-13&id=3830
Dear fellow Mongers:
I have found where to buy Orasure Oral HIV Testing Kits in BKK for 2500 Baht for a box of 25 kits. The company name is Asia Pacific Biotech and the contact email for the company is: Supasorn--supasorn at brianet.com.
I contacted Supasorn and he responded to me in one day and also sent a map. I am attaching the map, however, with the size limitations, it may be impossible to read. I am sure if anyone is interested they can contact Supasorn for a detailed map of where to buy this product.
I will be in BKK in January and I am looking for weekly GFE and I really prefer testing the girls. These test kits are less than USD3 a piece and are 99 percent effective.
Anyways, I hope you find this information helpful and informative.
Thanks,
Wil
Wilsafris,
I like your idea. The only downside to the test is sometimes the HIV hides in the system and they might come out negative now but six months from now turn up positive. Some people might not want to believe this but I discussed this topic a doctor.
Wilsafris, ChiMan,
these Oral HIV Testing Kits are excellent tools for testing only one thing: how gullible one can be.
The connection between HIV and AIDS is way more complex than what most people seem to believe, and those tests, or any such test, are after antibodies to HIV, not HIV itself anyway.
If one is afraid of HIV, then one should refrain from partaking in high-risk behaviors, like unprotected sex with working girls, or any stranger for that matter.
Screening those one-night-stands using whatever method shady biothech companies can persuade you of buying makes no sense at all.
HI
I completely understand that HIV can be undetected in most humans up to 6 months. I completely understand the ramifications of having sex, unprotected, or protected with a working girl. However, i do take issue that Orasure is a fly by night biotech company. These products are made in the USA and Orasure is a publicly traded company on the NASDAQ and Orasure is a FDA approved product. For more info on Orasure, look up the stock symbol OSUR. The Oral Test requires a swab of the inside of the cheek. It is a simple test, and quick and 99 percent effective.
Of course, by testing someone, there is always the risk they have HIV and the test will come back negative because of the 6 month window. However, it gives ME more sense of security.
This board is for the passing of information. Everything I have stated about Orasure is true. Finding Orasure in BKK might be very important to some people. Research the company and be happy there is such a product on the market : )
Is this section only for AIDS, or can we speak about other STDs ?
Has any of you ever get a "moluscum contagium" ? This is a kind of little shits that have been growing on my pubic (not the organs so far) and can become red and itching. According to the doctor I have seen in this Pattaya hosptital, it is not very serious but quite persistent and contagious. So I got that from one of the cuties here... He suggests a curage but I have not yet decided what to do. Ii seems that cream is not very efficient. Any experience of that ? Thanks.
Erik -- left you a response in the general Safe Sex area.
Erik,
Please tell us. When you got this std. Did you wear a condom? Did you see anything out of the ordinary when you looked at the girls vaginal area. I did post on a previous post about some things I have seen that scared me.
I always wear condom. I have 3 small blisters on the pubis, not the organs. Apparently it could also come from hotel towels...
And... I have no way to recall which girl offered me this chrismas present.
Erik,
I doubt you got that from the towels. But you answered a question I often wondered about. Can we catch STD's from girls even with a condom on by just letting our pubis touch. I guess the answer is yes. I bet that girl had an open sore around her vaginal area that you did not see but it came in contact around your pubic area. I was always cautious on Thai woman who always try to do everything in the dark. I always wonder what they dont want me to see? Please let us know how your condition turns out or at least private message me because I am aways trying to learn more ways to stay safe.
Thank you and I will you luck with your condition.
Opebo
Your posts are as always of "very high quality", especially your math regarding the risk of getting HIV.
If the risk of getting HIV is as low as you say, how do you explain the spreading of HIV around the world ? It should be much less due to your comments.
Some people never learn
To the millions of reader worry about my health : you can read my report in the Special Interest/Safe sex section.
Ci Man II : so that is your understanding of the "I shy" trick. Maybe...
The_Traveler,
Two factors - 1) the spread of hiv around the world is highly exaggerated. And 2) it is spread by various activities that have little to do with the typical circumsized heterosexual monger. For example - intravenous drug use, receptive anal sex, receptive vaninal sex, and more rarely penetrative sex (especially 'dry sex') with an uncircumsized or diseased penis.
What I do - low stress, well lubricated penetrative sex, either vaginal or anal - simply isn't very risky. And it sure feels better than condom-sex.
erik,
when they say "i'm shy" maybe they are hiding something or maybe they really are shy? you never know? i never understood how a hooker could be shy. when i went to the massage parlor "cupicity" or how ever you spell it i paid like 3000 baut for a girl that would say this to me and never let me see her stomach or privates. she always wanted to keep it covered. from what i could get glimses of she had a baby before and that whole area looked terrible and unhealthy. in thailand you never know what to expect. if i am going to be with a girl that is banging 50 guys a week i want to at least get a peek what i am putting my dick into. i don't like to go in blindly.
Opebo, posting in a forum titled 'safe sex' - and promoting sex without a condom is unfathomable. Let me guess, you have your own theories about catching warts, chlamydia, herpes, syphillis etc. which also somehow justify your ignorant, foolish, selfish behaviour? Absolutely undefendable.
Of course you are right in your own mind, because you are arrogant enough to concoct your own little dreamworld. Never mind the chances of impregnating these girls which you obviously care little. If you are so educated about these matters you would also agree that the risks are greater for the girl, and subseqently every other monger that comes into contact.
Why do we let these people post in a group title 'safe sex'. Opebo - what exactly are you doing here sharing your wisdom?
Opebo
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) the spread of hiv around the world is highly exaggerated
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please post the correct numbers of HIV cases in the different countries depending of the way of transmission.
Thanks for sharing your ultimate wisdom with us.
Sincerely
The Traveler
This guys is a fucking winner!! :mad:
Crispy, et al
I'm just doing a little debunking. Its all just opinion, theory, and a few skewed statistics. You seem to believe there's only one way of looking at the issue. We just have different definitions of 'safe'.
The_Traveler,
Of course no one has exact numbers on the amount of hiv in the world, or the method of transmission. But I suspect the numbers of males out there that got it through penetrative sex, as opposed to receptive sex or intravenous drug use, are very, very few.
Obepo,
There are lots of very nasty STDs that one can get - and spread further - through heterosexual intercourse, especially in paid sex encounters in underdevelopped countries.
Irrespective of your opinion on HIV-AIDS and its prevalence in the world (and I am a declared skeptic about much of the HIV-realted accepted wisdom), the kind of behavior you are advocating is both misguided and irresponsible.
This reinforces my impression that the only thing preventing people from having a free-for-all unprotected sex atttitude, in Thailand and elsewhere, is the fear of HIV-AIDS, since it is perceived as the only untreatable STD.
But clearly, in your case, even that is not working ...
[quote]We just have different definitions of 'safe'.[/quote]
There's an understatement if there ever was one.
And you've nailed it nicely, Seydlitz.
Should this thread be titled "Safe (sic) Sex in Thailand"?
As I said before, just wait until they find a full working vaccine for HIV. You will likely be waiting two years to be able to book a flight to LOS. The pricing will triple over night. Ya I know P4P has been around in LOS much longer then HIV, but people, us mongers especially have been sexually repressed for some 20 years now! Trust me all hell will break loose once the fear of HIV is gone!
If you're banging WG around the world without a condom, trust me, it's only a matter of time before HIV bites you! There is a reason why in certain high risk areas of the south east Asia, some 83% of the WG have this disease! Parts of Africa are the same. Rationalize all you want in your own little dream world, but it will get ya! Might not be the 1st time you expose yourself, might not be the hundredth, but it will happen.
As for oral sex, I think receiving it presents are very minimal low risk, performing DATY, is probably a medium to high risk. I am all to aware of the stats, but trust me, people around the world are catching HIV at an alarming rate, most these days are heterosexuals. Safe sex is the only way, until a foolproof vaccine is designed. I dream of that day!
GETTINGTANG~!
Seydlitz,
I couldn't agree more about HIV being the only thing holding back sex tourism in any and all countries where it is tolerated. Of course this means mainly Thailand. Though I do question how much longer we will be tolerated even in Thailand.
Most guys refuse to take any risk at all. I suspect they think they're going to live forever. This is a common misconception, especially among Americans. The ony thing that might slightly reduce a huge post-HIV-vaccine increase in sex tourism is if women in the 'first world' become more promiscuous. It is conceivable they might do this since one risk factor would be gone. Then again, I think the main point of sex for them is financial advantage (though on a higher pay-scale than the developing world prostitute), so they'd probably remain un-generous.
Some STD advice - what would give a person one big welt on the shaft of the penis? It looks exactly like a big mostquito bite. I suppose it could actually be one.
Some STD advice - what would give a person one big welt on the shaft of the penis? It looks exactly like a big mostquito bite. I suppose it could actually be one.
http://web.archive.org/web/20030604162356/http://erl.pathology.iupui.edu/dermpath/derm_index.cfm
I tend to agree with Opebo.
I simply ask where is the evidence to the contrary? I don't see or hear of large numbers of mongers in Pattaya or any similar place contracting HIV. Freelancer specialists are obviously at greatest risk but nothing seems to slow them down.
Does anyone have any personal stories of buddies etc contracting HIV, how they think they got it (unprotected intercourse, oral, DATY etc)?
I just wrote a bit of a spiel in the Special Interest section of the main index. I'm really looking for some knowledgeable opinions (with some facts/evidence) and experiences.
Cheers
Red Rex
I personally used to know at least 3 girls who contracted HIV. One already died, the two others vanished (maybe dead too).
But I do not know how they contracted it. Might be upcountry in some cheap brothel or in Pattaya.
Do not expect to hear a large number of mongers telling you that they are HIV infected. They definately like to keep it secret.
It is there, believe me.
Have fun and be careful
Opebo is a walking and dying HIV / Syphylis / Gorno stupido trying to revenge the world just like a white ho I saw on TV a while ago. This woman with AIDs when asked why continued to be a hooker, said she just wanted to give it to others to revenge. While she was telling her true feeling this kid Opebo is telling lie to hide his deadly intention.
So my question is, and don't think it's silly please, as long as you are having protected sex, what are the dangers for AIDS and STD? I know nothing is 100%.
James Tran,
You might be interested to know that I had my usual hiv test just before departing for the States about two weeks ago - Negative of course. Usually I follow up with one a few months after being back, but I have no doubts or worries on this front. Its simply not something one is likely to pick up through penetrative activities.
Bound in Iraq,
Don't worry about a thing, enjoy your well deserved vaction. You're 100% safe with condoms - heck even we barebackers are highly unlikely to get it.
Bound in Iraq, according to a study published in the January 2002 issue of "Sexually Transmitted Diseases" done by some CDC folks, not wearing a condom is twenty times riskier than wearing one, in terms of contracting HIV. That takes into account stuff like condoms breaking (pegged at 5% of the time) percentages of both gays and hererosexuals who have HIV, and the accuracy of HIV tests. They say that the safest sexual activity, in terms of HIV, is receiving oral sex -- giving is twice as risky -- that, for guys, vaginal sex is ten times and anal 13 times riskier than receiving oral. Condom wearing would then be factored into those numbers.
I've only read an abstract of the article, and their conclusions seem to be based on US stats, so I can't comment on their methodology or conclusions. This also speaks only to HIV.
Some other numbers, just for the sake of argument -- if you presume that 1 in 250 working TGs are HIV+, (just to pick a number in the general ballpark, feel free to change this) then your odds of having a sexual encounter with an infected partner on any given encounter is 0.004. Have sex a hundred times with different TGs and that means your odds of exposure are around 0.004 x 100 or 40%. (Exposure obviously does not equal infection; that's a different issue -- estimates I've seen on this range wildly and are connected to tons of variables.) If you presume your condoms are only 90% effective in preventing HIV transmission (low according to most studies, even including breakage) then your odds of exposure end up going down considerably for the same 100 encounters -- 0.004 x .090 x 100 = 0.036, so basically you've got a 96.4% safety rate after those 100 encounters. To me, there's a critical difference between a 60% non-exposure rate and a 96.4% one. It ain't perfect, but it's a lot better.
Hi,
I've finally decided to try MPs this time. Shall be in Bangkok this weekend. Do I have a chance to get any disease becuase of this?
Can I get AIDS or any STD if do the tub thing? I'll avoid penetrative sex anyway.
Please respond. No cynicism.
Thanks
Prince,
No cynicism from me, just pity...
Have you ever considered talking to your gp about this?
Where ever you live, there must be a place where you can go and ask all the questions you have and get some answers.
We don't live in the fifties anymore, you know...
Last night, the condom broke. I felt it, pulled out immediately and ran to the shower to wash off.
Does anyone have an informed opinion about the chances of catching a nasty given the circumstances? Also, how long do I need to wait to test and where I can go in LOS to do so?
purple, if you pulled out immediately and washed off the chances are almost nil that you would catch something. if you urinated immediately as well the chances are almost zero. i wouldn't even worry about it enough to get checked.
civ2000-
PnG, as Civ says the probability is that you're safe, but the window period for testing varies widely in terms of the type of STD, so it's tough to say exactly when you should get tested if that's what you want. The quickest an infection would be detected is generally two days -- and that's only for Gonorrhea, with most others taking around two weeks at a minimum to show up. The best way to check things is to have a blood test done at 3 months and another at six, as that covers basically all the windows.
Thanks for the responses (in this thread and by PM). I'm calm about it now and will wait my 2 weeks for a first test and then get more thorough work-ups at the recommended 3 and 6 month intervals.
Also, I'm gonna have my little bit of Joy checked as well so I can be doubly sure.
Overly paranoid? Maybe, but spilling a little blood in a vial and pissing in a cup is a small cost to pay for piece of mind :)
Thanks again.
The WHO estimates that half of all sex workers in LOS are HIV +. That is a sobering thought. The same study also notes that in the North, that figures is probably 75%.
Condoms decrease any chance of obtaining an STD dramatically, but when you mix alcohol, stupidity, sleep deprivation, Cialis and more infected hotties than you can shake a stick at...well, anything can and does happen.
Pix won't open. gives Warning can't open
Golazo,
the WHO estimates are just that, estimates spewed out by mathematical models.
One should rely on WHO facts and figures. But there are not enough of those to support the estimates regarding HIV prevalence, as nobody ever bothered to run comprehensive field tests, because of cost, political resistance, etc.
In the absence of evidence, these estimates are rather wild guesses, that could be miles away from the truth.
This of course is no reason to abandon safe sex behaviors, since even in a totally HIV-free world there are countless of nasties that one can catch.
Golazo, would you please cite a specific source for those figures, as they're radically higher than any others I've ever tracked down. I know, for example, that the 2000 UNAIDS/WHO estimates were at 7% for Bangkok and ranged up to 57% in places in the north. The last time I saw estimates in your ranges for Thailand were from the early 90s.
[quote][i]My reply to a PM from Obepo concerning his request for info on BBFS at Eden (BKK2004 thread)[/i]
First, it wasn't an attack. It was more like a slap in the face, 'Wake the fuck up', kind of thing. However, since you are obviously doing this with every bit of awareness...
You're not worth the time wasted to look up hard numbers, so I'll stick with conservative estimates. Unprotected sex with an HIV person carries greater than a 5% chance of causing transmission of the disease. More than 1% of pros are infected. the odds are that you're infected as well. That leaves at least a .02 probability that you would catch the nastiest from any pro you fuck. Add in the rest of the nasties, even excluding those that penicilin can rectify, and you've got to be looking at a well over .1, but the .02 is good enough to prove the point. You say you've barebacked a couple 100? We'll assume that means 200. If you've barebacked 200 and had a .02 chance of contracting HIV, then you have a probability of 1 for being a diseased dude (and a probability of 20 for all the nasties). When's the last time you got checked? My guess is never, or you're lying about not knowing you're infected.
How does that fuck things up for the rest of us? You're spreading your diseases you worthless, walking dead, mother fucker. When you give someone HIV, you are killing them and possibly the people they have sex with (whether their partner's wear protection or not does not erase all probability). So, you go around spreading your shit and are not only raising the risk level for the rest of us, but you are killing your partners.
Basically, you're a murdering, diseased, fucked up in the head shitbag. I'm not your buddy.
Lay off? You can fuck off.
[quote]
Opebo wrote on 04-13-04 19:17:
PurplenGold,
Friend, my question about Eden was an honest one, I don't see why you had to attack me:
>Obepo, are you insane? You are seeking out bareback with pros?
I've barebacked at least a couple of hundred. Nothing worse than a few antibiotics required on rare occasions.
>Are you already infected with all the nasties and just want to fuck the world up for the rest of us?
A) No, uninfected, of course. You've just plain got your facts wrong on female to male transmission.
B) How does it fuck it up for the rest of you? If you're wearing your condom, you're not going to get anything regardless. What she does with others is none of your business.
[/quote]
Please, people, ignore this fool's request. And, if anyone knows him personally, please smack the shit out of him in order to knock some sense into him.
PnG, I'm sure 99% of the mongers on this board agree with you (myself included) but there has been at least a hundred posts warning Obepo of his idiosy and suicidal ways to no avail.
Some guys just never learn!
Did anyone see the report in Details Magazine, also the reports on Fox News saying that that said HIV and AIDS is not cause by normal sex between a man and a woman? And that the chance of getting aids through normal sex without a condom is one in five million and with a condom one in fifty million?
Not trying to start another condom vs. no condom fight here just asking the questions. It does make one think, if true maybe time to rethink the positions that we take?
Sexreview
SR, in this case I support what you say about re-thinking our positions. This doesn't equate to changing your position.
A number of years ago I heard on the (highly regarded) public radio system in Oz that the chances of contracting AIDS for a man have unprotected sex with an HIV-positive woman was about 1 in 400. You then needed to extrapolate those odds against the chances that the woman you were with was positive. This will obviously vary according to the lifestyle of the woman ie sex worker, amateur, etc etc.
I haven't heard or seen anything since which contradicts the 1:400 statistic. Of course you may always be the 1, but like so many things in life, we are often weighing up risks against rewards.
I don't condone or condemn unprotected sex - I just think we need to make our own choices, as does the (working) girl, and the next guy who goes with her.
jack
In China, nothing is ever as it seems.
PnG - while your intentions in the BB issue are correct, your statistics are a bt "muddled". Assuming a .02 (as in 2 percent) chance of an occurance, that same 2 percent occurs whatever the occassion. Just like throwing a "seven" in dice is always 6/36 - because you manage to throw 35 "not seven" in a row doesn't mean that the chance of the "seven" is "1" - it's still 1/6 (numbers are my work)
As to BB and the HiV, issue, though - without "proof" (as in "verified test" of non-infection, the risk is just too high. It's not like losing a bet (as in dice) will cost you some money - you risk your life
Use the BIG head, not the LITTLE head
Dinghy,
I understand what you're saying about a discrete event having the same probability, and that the effect is not cumulative if you are considering each test individualy. However, when checking the probability of an event occuring once in x tries, then you are playing with a different rule. If the probability for an event occuring on any particular 'roll of the dice' is P, then the probability of an event occuring once in X tries is x*P. This is because the probability is basically an or statement: P that Event occurs on try 1, or P that event occurs on try 2, etc... Basic probability. :)
In obepo's case (using my prior assumptions), the probability he will contract HIV on any particular uncovered encounter with a pro is always .02. However, when testing the probability that he contracted it in 200 tries, we get 200*.02 = 1.
And, I definitely agree with you about the risk being too high!
PurpleNGold,
If one in two hundred is not acceptable what about one in five million? Where do you draw your own line? We all take risks even flying on a plane to Thailand, so what level of risks is acceptable?
Sexreview
C'mon, Dude!
You mean you want to die, or be disease inflected for a lifetime. All, b/c cause you do't want to use a condom.
15min, to 2 hours of pleasure, for death, duh?
I want to have fun, not die.
Is it worth it? Just get a gf, then you don't have to use any.
PnG - then by your mathematical reasoning, if he did it X400 the probability would be _2_ (and probability can never exceed "1")
<smile>
SR - I sort of doubt the 1 / 5meg probability rate - While I'm no expert in means of transmission of HiV, I seriously doubt if it's necessarily that much different from clap or syph and they both infect thru the urethra.
As to air transport, though - it's an acceptable risk (low enough to be in the noise - lower than the chance of winning the lottery. I assume the 5meg rate is based on "normal" hetero??
SR, is there a solid source, coming from some sort of study, for those numbers? I've seen tons of different ones, and they also vary according to the sex act involved. There are tons of ways to massage those numbers -- they may, for example, be talking about a random encounter, where you're coming into contact with any woman in the US, which is different from coming into contact with a sex provider in LOS. Talking about strict transmission possibilities and giving numbers that include rates of possible exposure are two very different things, as the latter are much more situation-specific.
As I mentioned previously, according to a study done by CDC folks specifically about the issue, not wearing a condom is 20 times riskier than wearing one, in terms of contracting HIV, which is different from the number you quoted which says ten times. I'd be interested in tracking down the differences.
Guys, It seems to me that the mongers who go condomless are missing the big picture. Always when debating whether to suit up or not for FS the focus always seems to be on HIV.
I've read where a lot of doctor's are now saying that Hep C is just as dangerous as HIV. It is about 200 times as easy to catch as HIV, has a long incubation period where you show no symptoms, and results in a chronic illness progressing to liver failure and death. Interferon which works part of the time is like having the worst flu you ever had for a year.
In fact I read one physican who was quoted as saying with all the new treatments on the horizon for HIV, if he had to choose between the two he'd pick HIV.
Then of course is Hep B which is very common and extremely easy to pass sexually. It's often not too bad but increases the liklihood of liver cancer exponentially.
How about warts? I don't really like the idea of ugly and painful warts all over my dick which grow back as fast as the doctor can burn them off. Heck, if I had only twenty years to live I think I would rather have HIV.
Herpes: yuck!
The Clap: hey pissing razor blades is just not my cup of tea. But for you masochists out there.
Lots of nasties out there and I just like myself too much not to cover up.
Civ2000
Dinghy,
A probability greater than 1 doesn't have real physical significance, but it can arise mathematically when dealing with these types of problems.
Basically, if I say I rolled the dice a thousand times, I can say that the probability is greater than 1 that I rolled a seven at least one time out of that thousand. However, physically it's possible (though extremely improbable) that I didn't roll a seven at all. And, if you ask what's the probability of rolling a 7 on the next roll then the probability is, correctly, less than 1.
It is particularly weard people panic when talking about HIV. The chances you catch HIV by bloodtransfusion or other means besides sexual contacts are close to equal. I guess lots of us are too much Media addicted.
Other infections like stated by Civ2000 are more due to sexual contacts and therefore more dangereous to be caught! And not so very "in demand" on media channels.
As far as it goes to punting and not having knowledge of the background of the girl, be safe and wear your preservatives.
When one decides to take a week or 2 weeks with one single girl (which happens in Thailand) you have more chances to know who you are dealing with, getting background info. Also the possiblity to make a medical checkup on her. This will give you certain insurances about most usual STD's, whereoff the tests give instant results or short term reports. So why not go without preservatives when all above conditions are fullfilled? Indeed, it is up to you anyhow. And nobody will give you a 100 percent certainty you will not catch anything.
If you really want to be "preserved" from STD's do not *****monger/swing anylonger. Become a monk. And stay away from the scene. Take a wife, get married and just hope she does not screw around, otherwise your chances are going up again.
I recon I could role a 7 on a dice at that moment PnG, maybe even with a 6-eyed dice.
So lets say take your chances but bear in mind you cannot do it with everyone.
Cream on Top,
Finally, a reasonable post on this subject rather than the nonsense statistical fiction one usually sees. It comes down to that - if you want to be perfectly safe, stay home and masturbate. Personally I don't find condom-sex enjoyable in any way, and can't understand why anyone would want to pay for it or find it preferable to masturbating at home. But I respect other's right to be unrealistic hypochondriacs.
This is an issue that seems to attract a lot of puritans and busy-bodies. Whether or not to use condoms is a personal choice. Alas, some people like PurpleNGold, et al, simply don't respect others or their right to choice.
The facts are the risk is very, very tiny, and - I hate to be the one to break this to you - one isn't going to live forever anyway. If one were this unreasonable about all risks one could never drive a car or take a shower standing up - might slip! Puritans just have a different calculus of risk for hedonistic activities than they do for unpleasant or mundane activities. While I can respect their choice, I like to remind them it has nothing to do with reason.
Obepo, in case you didn't notice, the prior post by Cream on Top was not in support of your argument. He was referring to a different situation entirely (an LTR). Cream on Top, was talking about going bareback with a girl after you have her tested and have a reasonable assurance that she's clean.
I would still disagree with going bareback due to the dangers ending up with bastard children. I don't think Cream's suicidal or psychotic like Obepo, and wouldn't put him even in the same ballpark.
As for not respecting other people's rights to their own choices, I'm a pro-choice guy. However, You don't have the right to make choices that raise everyone else's level of risk.
The point, PurpleNGold, was that Cream on Top's position was a reasonable one, unlike your knee-jerk one.
The fact remains, its none of your business what other people do sexually, and it has nothingwhatever to do with your risk.
Opebo - well... the issue of YOUR going BB and your knee-jerk reaction to someone attempting to inform you of the risks point out your own misunderstanding of the "sharing the wealth". ASSUMING "we" (as in the community out here) don't BB, (BBBJ not included) "we" won't spread the nasties. Frankly, _I_ don't care what _you_ do (after all, it's YOUR life). IF you want to take the risk, that's OK.
PnG - depending on how many time you are with whomever poo ying, yes, there are chances of producing offspring. Hvaing her figure out WHO you REALLY are, though, is another matter entirely. They never get anything real from me (my nickname is "doi" (mountain) and that's all they get) - and where I stay doesn't even ask for anything except a "name" and baht so I'm relatively untraceable.
You have to care somewhat. This is someone life you are talking about. Whether, it is man, or woman, No one deserve to catch this disease, even if you can prevent it.
My life is worth more than 15 min. to 2 hours of fun, than prolonging death. I love my life more than that. The girls in Thailand, just want to survive, and support their families. They are willing to do anything to do that. You can't blame them. Us, We are lucky SOB, from the western world, that we can having anything we want, or need. With convertion of the dollars in our favor, we live like King, if we want. Why spoil a good thing?
Any Sex worker is high risk. If you are going to do that, then you have to go to countries where the risk is low. Unfortunately, Thailand is not one of them.
Ouch, Dinghy, and with all due respect, I hate to say it but that attitude is just as troubling as not worrying about whether or not you're spreading STDs. Creating kids and disappearing without a trace is hardly the most honorable policy. (I know you're not doing that, but that's the way it comes off.)
And Opebo, I presume you're including your own "nonsense statistical fiction" in your statement, as you've certainly thrown enough unsubstantiated numbers and statements around here. I fully agree with you that using or not using condoms is a personal choice -- but advocating for responsible mongering is hardly being a "puritan." The bottom line is that everyone here's out banging multiple partners for baht, and very often the same partners, so one person's choices can affect another's.
Ok Guys,
We can all pretend that there are no STD's in Thailand. We can calculate the percentage of catching something. But, it only takes one time. Bareback is very easy to get there along with alot of other things. If you do get a girl knocked up. What happens if you go back there next year and run in to her. You probally won't but there is always a chance you could. The goverment is very harsh with this offense if she reports you. It is best to stay safe each time so you live to go back next year.
Joe - so, lets put this in perspective - Even if I cared about the girl, exactly HOW would _I_ know if she got pregnant? I'm in country for some maybe 2 or 3 weeks, not even in the same locality and then gone and not back for what would be the 9 month gestation period. UNLESS I met up with her later and she told me... (and then given a working girl, how - unless thru DNA - would I even have asurances it was MINE?) What
No disagreement whatsoever about the reality of the situation and completely no accusation here -- and there's absolutely no doubt that any number of working TGs probably have told a dozen different farangs they're the father at various times in an attempt to get their hooks in. I was simply reacting to the attitude that you're safe because you're untraceable as being counter to the concept of responsible mongering, that's all.
Amen,
I wonder why the AIDS in Africa is now killing so many people. Does the risk 1/5milion make any sense? Of course not! Don't tell me the African folks with AIDS are all using blood transfusion or needles to spread this disease. Let assume 1 mil of the AIDS folks have never been drug addicts and never used condoms then the time to infect AIDS to 1 milion folks is ~ 200000 years! He he .. do the math and figure out my assumptions! Is there a contradiction here?
Just a question
any advice regarding viagra or the like ?
Which product is best, prices ?
Like to try it once, maybe a performance boost, who knows :D
Please don't jump on me, I know I had seen a few post regarding that in the past and I could search the database. But products and prices change all the time and I am in a hurry right now.
Any advice appreciated.
TIA
TT
Viagra is good but expensive (200-300B ea.) Indian counterparts Penagra, Caverta are a lot cheaper and works the same (500 B for 4 tabs) The ingredients are the same. Lasts about 24 hrs. Try with half a tab first.
I hear Cialis is supposed to last 36 hrs. never tried it though.
Duni is right - the "generic" works the same for A LOT LESS MONEY (I paid 800B for 4 one place and thought that was a good price - at first) - IF you have to have the "name brand", however...
Traveler,
I have great success with Kamagra from India. 1/2 a tab, then the other half either approximately 12 or 24 hours later, and I was good for a week to a month. Seriously! No problemo! No complaints!
Think I paid 600 Baht for 4 at a pharmacy in front of the Ambassador Hotel in the plaza fronting Sukumvit.
The only issue was that I could fuck for hours and didn't feel like cumming. That's a serious porn star upside.
Robux
Duniawala, Dinghy, Robux
Thanks for the info.
Last night bought some chinese "generic" at a pharmacy close to Emporium.
800 for 4 tabs (200mg each). Tried to charge me 1600 for Viagra 8 tabs (100mg each).
Took half a tablet about 2 hours before and another half a tablet a bit later.
Not much of a difference.No performance boost as expected but a slight improvement. Guess it's not worth the money until you got this kind of prob.
The chicks I had during the last days are my viagra. Real f...king machines. No complaining if you go for a long ride. This was always my biggest prob with the real pros. Girls new to the business still enjoy and love sex. Pros are just out for the quick money.
Will give Kamagra a chance. If it lasts a week then it must be strong. :D
BTW, any side effects ? Viagra and the like were originally invented for heart treatment.
TT
There are no "chinese" sbstitutes. If there are then they must be fakes.
The Indian one you want is Penagra or Caverta. I am not sure about Kamagra.
All these have the same active ingredient as Viagra and in the same dosage, Called 'slidenfil'. Hence the same warning goes for these just as for Viagra.
Side-effects: I had some slight headaches the first time I used it. Also, you can go on and on without a release. Also, don't use it too often. you might get dependent on it. (the last is my personal opinion)
Kamagra is the same as Penagra, just made by another Indian company. Don't know where Traveler's getting "a week" though, as it lasts the same amount of time as any other form of Viagra.
BTW, I have heard that there are several Chinese knock-offs of Viagra that are actually ok, but there are so many fakes it's hard to tell what you're getting. The Indian ones are from legit companies there.
Side-effects of Viagra include headache, flushing, upset stomach, stuffy nose, diarrhea, and, in some people, tightness in the chest. For a true cautionary tale, take a look at TrashMan's heart attack tale in the Viagra & Other Performance Enhancers section.
Traveller - 200 mg - gad the "normal" V dose is 100. 200 will drain the blood from your eyeballs and make you stiff as a board
Recreational? You won't get it down for HOURS
oh, and it's SUDENAFIL CITRATE
Dinghy,
The proper spelling is:
Sildenafil citrate
If the name on the box is misspelled, I would not trust the contents...
er... I guess I'm glad I got new glasses (not joking) "il" and "u" looked about the same without the magnifying glass.
gad - what HAVE I been using as lube - preparation H?
we get too soon old and too late smart.
While in Cambodia my moto driver took me to a pharmacy where I bought Kamagra and Zeagra. Each box contained 4 tabs, 100 mgs each. The Kamagra was $10 USD for the box of 4. The Zeagra was $8 USD for a box of 4. As I reported in the Cambodia thread, I took one (forget which) and half an hour later my dick started getting hard as a Cambodian lady gave me a manicure. Right after that I had an afternoon romp with 2 Cambodian cuties and afterwards, as they washed themselves and me, my dick was still rock hard. It eventually went down.
I took all 8 tabs over a 4 day time span and I believe they worked really well. They lasted through my days in Cambodia and Pattaya (8 girls.)
I'll post the picture of the nice Cambodian lady whose manicure gave me a hardon. I bought a "Red Bull" hat (written in Chinese) at the Bangkok airport; I put it on her head and then took her picture ($2 USD for a manicure and pedicure.)
Duniawala
not a substitute, a generic.
Like Kamagra is from India and that one was from China. Couldn't read the name, had the same ingredient like Viagra but double dosis.
Joe Zop
Robux said that Kamagra lasts a week. Will give it a try on my next trip. Cronin and me bought a few to check them out.
Had no side effects so far with the chinese stuff.
Dinghy
I usually don't get it down for hours. :)
The girls often prefer quick sex = quick money which was always my biggest prob with pros in LOS. This time I was very lucky that all of them seem to enjoy, but after 2-3 hours even those had enough.
Not much difference and no real performance boost when taking Viagra and the like. The only difference I saw was that I sometimes got a hard on without any reason. Maybe I am still too young :D
Sorry to post this question which might have been discussed before but I gotta ask. Please don't bombard me with diatribe.
In LOS, where can I take my girl for a medical check-up that 'working' girls usually go to do their checks? Are the results out in the same day?
Pls advise.
Thanks,
AM2
As far as I'm aware, Kamagra and Penegra are the same thing -- I read a number of articles about them in Indian newspapers when I was in Delhi which described their processes of making sure they could be manufactured under Indian copyright law (which basically says it's ok to manufacture a drug that might be protected elsewhere as long as you use a substantially different method to do so.) They come in 50 and 100mg doses, exactly the same as Viagra, and contain citrate salt of Sildenafil, same as Viagra, so the only way they'd affect you for a week is if Viagra itself would do that. You've used that, so you well know how it will or will not affect you personally. Robux may have had that effect, but the bottom line is that Kamagra is generic Viagra, and expecting it to do something that Viagra does not, in terms of how long it lasts, is wishful thinking. Its advantage is that it's cheaper.
YMMV, for sure. I've found that different formulations of meds, between name brands and various generics, give me different results. Perhaps it's my body chemistry. Maybe it's the floor sweepings they mix into the generics as a binder that have the right buffering effect for me.
Asian Monger #2
are you still in Pattaya ?
If so, go to the PIC hospital in soi 4. They do all kind of check ups and also a HIV test. It's a bit more expensive than the Memorial and closer than the Bangkok Pattaya but I personally put more trust in their results.
In BKK go to the Bumrungrad hospital also in soi 4 (Sukhumvit this time) as far as I remember. It's one of the best in Thailand.
A HIV test was about 1.000 baht. Ask Tapioca, he did it last time we had been there :D
Check out the female pre-nuptual checkup. Flat fee. All inclusive.
[url]http://www.bumrungrad.com/en/packages/spec/checkup/ckup7-2.asp[/url]
Also, check out the male pre-nuptual checkup. Same deal.
Robux
Traveler,
No, I was in Pattaya from 30th Apr till 1st May. Now I'm back in KL, Malaysia.
I just wanna know, the next time I'm on business in BKK, where can I take my girl for a check-up. That's all.
Thanks for your info.
AM2
asia monger,
go to http://www.bumrungrad.com/ in soi 3 for a check up. reading several of the hthreads here and seeing how thai hookers seem to think a bar of soap will cure them, perhaps we should see what islamic law has to say on the matter:
istabra (the process of cleaning the urethra)
73. istabra is a recommended act which is performed by men after [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord112][CodeWord112][/url]. its object is to ensure that no more [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] is left in the urethra. there are certain ways of performing istabra and the best of them is that if after the passing of wind the anus also becomes impure it should be purified first. thereafter the portion from the anus up to the root of male organ should be pressed thrice with the middle finger of the left hand. then the thumb should be placed on the penis and the forefinger should be placed below it and it should be pressed thrice up to the point of circumcision and the front part of the male organ should be jerked thrice.
74. the liquid which comes out of the penis of man after joking and jesting with or embracing a woman and is called 'mazi' is pure and same is the case with the liquid which at times comes out after semen, and is called 'wazi' similarly the liquid which at times comes out after [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] and is called 'wadi' is pure, if [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] does not reach it. and if a person performs istabra after [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord112][CodeWord112][/url] and then liquid comes out of his penis and he doubts whether it is [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] or one of the above- mentioned three liquids that liquid is pure.
75. if a person doubts whether he has performed istabra or not and a liquid comes out of his penis about which he does not know whether it is pure or not that liquid is impure and if he has performed ablutions it becomes void. however, if he doubts whether he performed the istabra correctly or not and a liquid comes out of his body about which he does not know whether it is pure or not that liquid is pure and it does not also invalidate the ablutions.
76. if a person performed istabra after [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord112][CodeWord112][/url] and also per- for ablutions and if after ablution a liquid comes out of his body which he considers to be [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] or semen it is obligatory for him to perform ceremonial bath as a precautionary measure and also to perform ablutions. however, if he has not already performed ablutions it is sufficient to performed ablutions.
77. in case a person does not perform istabra after [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord112][CodeWord112][/url] and on account of sufficient time having passed since he urinated he is sure that no [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] is left inside the urinary organ and in the meantime some liquid discharges from it about which he is not sure as to whether it is pure or not, that liquid is pure and does not also make the ablutions void.
78. istabra is not prescribed for female after [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord112][CodeWord112][/url] and if a liquid comes out of her body and she doubts whether it is [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] that liquid is pure and it does not also invalidate ablutions and ceremonial bath.
recommended and abominable acts
79. when a person enters the lavatory it is recommended (mustahab) that he should first place his left foot inside it and having covered his head he should sit at a place where no one can see him. it is also recommended that he should place the weight of his body on the left foot, and while leaving the lavatory he should first place his right foot.
80. it is abominable (makrooh) to face the sun or the moon while evacuating bowels or bladder. but if a person somehow covers his private parts it is not abominable. apart from this it is not desirable to sit for [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord112][CodeWord112][/url] etc. facing the current of the wind; it is also abominable to sit on the roadside or in lanes and y lanes or in front of the doors of the house or under the shade of the fruit-yielding trees. it is also not desirable to eat something in this condition or take more than usual time sitting there or to wash with the right hand. unnecessary talking is also not desirable. however it does not matter if one is constrained to talk or if one utters allah's words.
81. it is abominable to [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord111][CodeWord111][/url] while standing, or on hard earth, or in the holes of the animals, or in the water (especially standing water).
82. it is also abominable to suppress evacuation of bowels or ladder, and unlawful if it is injurious for health.
83. it is recommended that one should [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord111][CodeWord111][/url] before offering prayers, sleeping and having sexual intercourse, and after the seminal discharge.
Safe Sex In Thailand.
What a name for a discussion board. Is there such a thing as safe sex in Thailand?
Question. Just came back from Thailand - all the girls seemed to love French kissing and all - what's the point of having condoms if her tongue was in my throat half the time?
What's the lowdown on this? Are you supposed to push her away (which I certainly didn't) or what? What's the scoop, guys?
I already heard from one respected member through PMs - I was wondering what's your take on this, guys.
Please let know folks, so that I don't make any mistakes during my next trip.
Thanks!
Cloud9 Seeker
I guess they expect that all farangs like it. I usually do not french kissing, she might be blooding when brushing her teeth and I might have eaten something crispy. Blood could be involved and I do not like that idea. Furthermore most of the girls do BBBJ and I do not know how long ago this has been. Disgusting imagination.
Keep kissing her on the lips but do not open up your mouth or tell her straight away why you do not like it. Every girl who I have explained it respected and even liked it. They feel much better and secure with a guy who is careful about HIV.
Traveler,
That puts things into perspective for me.
Thanks
Cloud9 Seeker
Even though it might be more enjoyable and fun, I would hesitate to french kiss any Thai bargirl.
During my first trips to LOS, I was surprised the girls were kissing like that also. I asked one girl if she kissed every man that barfined her. She got this really stupid look on her face and said, "if man pay for me, why can't I kiss him?".
Anyway, the reality is that 99% of Thai bargirls will do ANYTHING as long as your paying, and have absolutely no clue about diseases. Even though it's hard to resist when you're having a good time, you might want to think twice about kissing them.
Have you ever seen that shapeless bald headed freak Nigel that has a thai bargirl website where he's doing all kinds of things without any protection? Just think about your sweet little bargirl licking the dirty a-hole of that ugly bastard the night before she's french kissing you, and you'll be more careful from now on!
I once foolishly accepted a bbbj in Phuket from a really cute girl, and wound up with the worst case of Gonorrhea imaginable. It lasted two months and took all kinds of anti-biotics to get rid of. It just isn't worth the risk.
Dana - gonorrhea?? That is truly wild.
Will think twice about opening my mouth next time, that's for sure. They took the initiative and I happily obliged, but I will not engage in this next time.
Cloud9 Seeker,
<what's the point of having condoms if her tongue was in my throat half the time?>
You cannot be serious, can you ?
Why don't you go reading good advice from authoritative sources ? I suggest the CDC at www.cdc.gov .
As far as I know, French kissing is not such a high risk activity. But if you feel uncomfortable, just don't do it.
Seydlitz - I certainly checked out CDC. Did you?
This from yahoo/health: (http://health.yahoo.com/health/centers/hiv_aids/101)
__________________________________________________
Q: Can HIV be spread through kissing?
A: Although studies have found tiny amounts of HIV in the saliva of some people with HIV, researchers have found no evidence that HIV is spread to other people through kissing. However, the CDC recommends against "French" or open-mouthed kissing because of the possibility of contact with blood if the people kissing have any cuts or sores in the mouth.
__________________________________________________
So, yes, I am serious. Risk might be low, but being a newbie, I am wondering what other pundits choose to do and what the norm among fellow members is.
Realistically, kissing is not a high risk activity for STD transmission. Yes, you can get an STD if your partner and you have open sores and transmit blood to each other, and certainly you can transmit herpes, generally HPV1, that way, as well as Hep B (but of course all smart LOS mongers have had their Hep shots, right?) There are also possibilities of transmitting gonorrhea (though you'd have to have your tongue pretty much massaging her vocal chords) and syphilis (only in the early infective stages, and you'd generally see a sore on the lip) via kissing, but overall these and the other risks are low to the point that [i]most[/i] authorities consider kissing to be safe sex.
In the single case that documents HIV transmission via kissing, both partners had severe dental and gum problems, including canker sores, gingivitis, oral hairy leukoplakia, and periodontitis. So obviously, the circumstances in which HIV can be transmitted through kissing are rare. The CDC recommends against prolonged open-mouthed kissing with an infected partner based on this, but if you read the actual report where this case is documented you find the following "Although the exact route of transmission in this report cannot be determined, the [i]most likely possibility[/i] is that the woman became infected..." this way, and that "such exposure [i]may[/i] have occurred during "deep kissing." (My italics.) This is a couple that also had vaginal sex six times a month over the course of a year, had an incident of condom breakage, shared at times a razor and toothbrush, and seemed basically to be pretty haphazard about hygiene in general, so it's hard to put a huge amount of stock in the conclusions of the report regarding kissing, as the report itself notes that "other exposures to the man's blood or semen cannot be excluded." Basically, in other words, they don't exactly know, but they suspect this is how it happened, and the researchers certainly got a lot more attention from their conclusions this way than if they had decided that plain old sex had been the cause.
I say kiss away, unless you happen to be someone who's got severe dental problems, because the STD risks are nothing really to worry about. There are far more serious things with STDs on which to focus concern.
Joe Zop
even if the risk is low, it isn't ZERO.
Seydlitz
I feel uncomfortable with it. It's not just HIV. Would you kiss a BJ bar girl or one of Marc's chicks who also use to lick the customers a-holes ? I won't.
Take care
Traveler:
I would not kiss a BJ bar girl because I would not take one out. In the rare occasions (2 !) I have been to a BJ bar, it was for a BJ. The ladies there are good at what they do, but they are nothing to write home about, and not much to take home either.
Similarly, I would not kiss an Eden girl because I hate the place and its obnoxious owner, and would not be likely to be in physical contact with one.
So, in a nutshell, I do not feel uncomfortable with kissing a girl in general terms, but I am quite selective of my partners.
Anal rimming is an increasingly widespread practice in LOS, in massage parlours in particular (I routinely got it at Poseidon or Baron's for example), and a great thing to enjoy as the receiver. So it is not only Marc's ladies who lick customers a-holes, as you graphically put it :)
Anyhow, there is hardly any "dirty" sexual practice, provided that strict personal hygiene is enforced, as it is mostly the case among Thais. I am way more concerned by the potential presence of faecal colliforms on the hands of the cook preparing my meal in any restaurant, and not only in LOS for one, than on the tongue of a sex provider.
Considering that I only consort with young, clean, apparently healthy ladies, I reckon that the risk of getting infected by something serious is low enough compared to the enjoyment of French kissing.
However, I agree that intimate physical contact with a sexually promiscuous partner entails some level of risk, and I do understand and fully respect those like you who feel uncomfortable with kissing a P4P TG.
Cloud9 Seeker,
point well taken.
I meant that you cannot seriously mean that whatever risk created by a tongue in your mouth defeats the protective purpose of wearing a condom.
Forgive my being obsessive with the careful use of words in the context of safe sex, as old hands of this forum will testify, I am.
Seydlitz
that was only an example since we know each other and I remember your good taste and high standards regarding girls.
It's more the imagination that the girl just had a dick in her mouth or her tongue was close to body parts that should never even come close to my face than the real danger of getting infected. The girls are usually very clean but you do not know anything about the hygiene of the last few customers.
Take care
Guys (and Seydlitz):
Thanks for providing the feedback - I came to the conclusion that French kissing is rather low-risk, but care is still required. Next time, I will think twice before opening my mouth.
Seydlitz- in my week in Thailand, NOT ONCE have I picked a non-bar girl; they were all bar workers alright. I can see why you're as comfortable with the kissing as you say you are - unfortunately, due to the short-time visit, I only frequented the bars (and a MP).
Anal rimming in Thailand! How did I miss that?? Man, I must go back to Thailand - so many things to do and so little time. I wonder if the girls at Darling do anal rimming - do you just ask the manager of the MP which girl does it or what?
(Sorry for going off topic)
Thanks,
Cloudy
Traveler, the only zero STD-risk sexual activity is personal masturbation -- even with a condom you've still got some degree of risk. You are far, far more at risk with the use of multiple partners than from deep kissing someone, so none of us is exactly speaking from some high plane of absolute safety here.
Personally I don't have any big thing about kissing some woman because she might have sucked somebody's dick or whatever, as that's what I want her to do to me, and if I'm gonna be worried about it I'm basically going to end up with a sexual partner I find unsatisfying. The mouth tends to clean itself -- that's what saliva does -- so if she's been blowing or licking some gother guy in the last hour and she's not infected with the specific goodies I mentioned in the specific ways I mentioned, then there's little to worry about.
We've all got our particular areas of personal squeamishness, but that doesn't mean they're based in fact or logic.
Joe Zop
LOL, I want them to do the very same thing.
As I have already said, I am uncomfortable with the imagination of another dick in her mouth just a few hours/minutes ago. If you only see the scientific/medical point of view, congrats. I can't. Also like to avoid any unneccesary risk.
Cloud9 Seeker,
I do not like Darling too much, but last time I was there, I got anal rimming from the lady as a standard. No need to ask for it.
It is never sure that any particular lady will perform, and asking the papasan may be a good idea.
IMHO anal rimming is standard fare as a complement to BBBJ in massage parlors. If the lady does not do it on her own, then get her to lick your balls, push her head down and raise your butt. I am sure she will get the hint :)
Guys,
You want to talk about AR risks and other risks involved and the fact that a couple of minutes ago the same girl's mouth was sucking another guy's dick.
If you are familiar with the scene in China, the risks are even higher. It's like playing with fire. Really. No joke.
I believe that TGs have a reasonable level of knowledge about STD/AIDS so they know a bit more than those village girls in China.
Just my 2 cents, but don't shoot me down,
AM2
Seydlitz - gotcha.
Thanks for the heads up. Will do! ;-)
I just don't like kissing these girls because they all have rank breath. Even the hot ones. Seriously, that stuff thats lodged between their mossy teeth is a mixture of rotten thai food, plaque, sperm, and poo. I had to get this one chick to use mouthwash and it still didnt get rid of the smell.
I found that I was better off when I fucked the hotel receptionist and the waitress at a bar. I guess they have less partners, and less chance of stds. They also seemed to have marginally better dental hygene. Dudes, when you're paying them, give them a complimentary pack of floss to go along with it. Tell them that americans use it and they're sure to comply.
Stinky,
Couldn't disagree with you more! It looks like we have different experiences, but I had 5 girls during my week in LOS and (having kissed each one) not one's breath stank!
Hell, when I woke up one morning with a girl I barfined at mandarin (NEP) and she kissed - even then, her breath didn't stink (try kissing a caucasian chick in the morning - just the thought makes me sick).
The girl I barfined LT on Koh Samui actually carried a toothpaste in her purse.
I bought a few girls beer, so obviously, a few did smell, well, like beer, but what the hell, I guzzled many bottles of Singha myself, so it all sort of levelled off.
These girls might be a lot of things, but others sure have much to learn from them when it comes to hygiene.
Stinky,
I have no idea where you've been picking up your girls in Thailand, but I have never seen what you're talking about. In fact, quite the opposite. Every Thai girl I've ever met, even the poor country girls, have always taken care of their choppers.
Of course, there are probably a few older girls that sit around drinking all day long, opening up the bottles with their teeth, and then drinking gallons of cum every night before passing out, and then waking up the next morning and starting again without thinking about brushing their teeth. It gives me chills just thinking about it.
Adjarn
Well, we all have our own experiences. I was referring to the girls of sukhumvit road. Their lives seem to consist of eating thai food and licking mens butts, so... bad breath central.
I have read alot of reports of condom breaking in thailand. I discovered this japanese condom called kimono ultra thin. It is the closed thing I have found to nothing at all. I do worry because of the thinness it may break. Any of you guys out there have a condom break? If so what was your mistake so the rest of us can learn.
Thanks
I had a condom break last year with a girl from NP but I realized it pretty quickly and threw on another one. I don't think there's really any secret...just bring your own condoms if you're on the larger size.
As for girls with bad breath/hygiene, I was in Thailand for 2 months last year and never had a problem with this. In fact, one girl I was with for a couple weeks made it a point to deeply wash herself with an anti bacteria soap after every session.
If you truly had as bad of an experience as you say, maybe its time to graduate from the skanks walking Sukumvit.
Thai people in general are very clean. Thai women are sort of clean freaks. Every been to a Thai resaurant? Notice even if it is a lower end establishment, it's almost always spotless and clean. Thai people tend to bath quite regularly and frequently.
I have never encountered a nasty Thai girl, not in the real sense anyhow. I have had a few with yeast problems, but quickly booted them aside, but most come clean fresh and always bath before and after the encounter.
TANG~!
My two cents on the cleanliness issue - since I've been back here in the States all I encounter is the fishy pussy. Over there I never ran into that. The girls were always clean, even the high volume BB ones. Makes you wonder about how uneducated the average American working girl is.
On the food issue - I've never gotten even slightly ill in Asia. The food is so much better! Whenever I come back to the US I get a lot of digestive problems from stomach aches to diarhea. The food here is much, much less clean, and certainly a lot more processed and worse for you than in Thailand.
I definitely agree that Thai gals mostly do not stink. Most of them have very clean pussy and breath. But be careful after they eat sontam. This thing is full of spices, garlic, raw crabs and the mouth wash do not clear the smell away for hours and hours. I had experiences a few times with gals who just finished whole plate of their yammy sontam. When you try to kiss them you are like eating sontam yourselves.
RCA Knight,
I do eat sumtam all the time. Delicious stuff. However its better not to get a BJ for a good hour after a girl eats it.
RCA Knight
The smell of somtam isn't a big prob, but the chili is, especially if you get a BBBJ :(
I don't feel like graduating beyond the bar skanks. I prefer this kind of seedy atmosphere (although I returned with the clap). T'was my condom that snapped. I'm kind of a grinder so its bound to happen.
How about you guys, anybody ever contract anything. How common is aids there anyway? I'm dreading the return of my bloodtest.
Somtam and Thai BBQ work both ways - had a girl ask me if I had eaten the Thai BBQ during a DATY session. SORT OF NEED TO BE NICE TO THEM, TOO.
Stinky: Interesting posts. I find most of these women, those who have teeth that is, generally have good teeth. This seems to hold throughout SE Asia. Floss is a very alien concept to these women. I found it hard to buy floss n Vietnam and I had to go to a pharmacy to get it (no luck in supermarkets or market stalls).
Lots of guys find the concept of kissing or eating out yellow pack hookers revolting. Others, of course, get off on less than hygienic "showers". As they say in Lancashire, there ain't nowt as strange as people.
Yes, Lancashire; wise words indeed. Those yellow gals with their pert bottoms and supple flesh, you cant have it all. Personally after a night on the sauce I'll go in for a good snog, but I never, AND I MEAN NEVER, have gone down below. I don't mean to offend some of the more sensitive members, but it just makes me think of period blood mixed with coffee. Nadda.
I'm fully aware that the poor things actually do brush their teeth, but they just don't know all of the modern techniques. I suppose next time, I'll put her down on my lap and school her in modern oral hygene: a proper thorough brushing (up from the gums; not side to side), followed by a few minutes to let the fluoride take effect. Then a gentle but thorough floss - paying close attention to the areas that seem to be bleeding. And then, to finish it all off, a nice alcohol-free, sensitive system, mouth rinse. Thats thirty seconds of swishing between the teeth, across the tongue, and finishing with a good gargle.
Okay. Safe sex in Thailand? How?
So I hear that Durex Maximums are the shit. What about durability during the friction slide?
Is it also true you can still get STDs from their cum juice where your rubber ends? Yikes!
Anyone know of someone to get hep from oral sex?
I know, lots of questions....just curious
Ouch Me,
Durex N11 are ever lasting. None ever broke when I used them - and I used up a lot by now:). I always use lube as well, just to be sure.
Hep B and C are sexualy contractable. Both badly fuck up your liver and that is bad news. Shots to protect you from Hep A+B are available. Rubbers keep both Hep B and C out.
If you happen to make a squirter with a nasty infection cum you could be in trouble and catch it too:(. Solution: Make sure she doesn't cum:D!
<<On the food issue - I've never gotten even slightly ill in Asia. The food is so much better! Whenever I come back to the US I get a lot of digestive problems from stomach aches to diarhea. The food here is much, much less clean, and certainly a lot more processed and worse for you than in Thailand.>>
I've had just the opposite experience. Three trips to Thailand and every time I get some kind of intestinal infection. I'm not sure what causes it, I'm careful to only drink bottled water and no ice in my drinks but 3 times I've been sick accomanied by a fever. Antibiotics cleared it up but I still wasn't feeling good for about a week.
In spite of this problem I can't wait to go back again.
Gwailo
Food in Thailand seems OK to me (never got sick - and I eat "pet pet") - but I sure got food poisoning in June in Cambodia. I think next time I won't have lobster. (on the beach)
Yeah, stay clear of shellfish in general. Even if you don't catch any of the myriad nasties they host (salmonella, ciguatera, e coli, dinoflagellates), you still might find yourself with just about the worst case of the shits you can imagine. After a prawn soup in Hua Hin, I BARELY made it back to my hotel before that meal exploded out the other end. I was fine immediately thereafter, but it was very painful and unpleasant.
Keep in mind that places like Chaweng, Phuket and Hua Hin are situated in shallow, warm bodies of water with slow currents. Given the amount of agricultural runoff from upland farms and the coliform bacteria from treated sewage that pretty much goes directly into the Gulf and the Andaman Sea, it's a matter of time before those shrimp come back to haunt you. Generally speaking, the fish is all right since its caught farther from land than most of the shellfish, and they aren't bottom feeders.
I can agree with that. Or can I? The only places I'll eat that stuff is at five star resorts, but I still came down with a mild case or the poos. But then how can I turn down another sea food platter? Mine wasn't painful, I just became a little more frequent for a few days, and it wasn't severe enough to interfere with my drinking schedule. I did, however, get a littler nervous one night when an 800 baht/long time girl was licking my ass.
But seriously, who knows where I got it from? Was it from that glass of water that girly boy gave me that morning? Was it from drinking singha out of cans? Was it the bugs in the slurpy machine at 7-11?
I'm more interested in how my p.p. turned a painful pink colour at the end and started dripping puss when I was using dubes the whole time. Anyway, if you come down with the clap, I recommend neurofen (extra strong) till the antibiotics kick in. You won't even feel it. Also, make you sure you [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] standing up or it burns.
I mean, all you can do is use rubbers, and drink bottled water, (and stay away from shellfish I guess). But lets be realistic, if you want to hang out in the jungle, you're at risk, and you'll just have to cross your fingers.
Anyone try dipping their cock in vodka after a session? I heard it works well in eastern europe.
When were you using dubes? Only with intercourse or even with BJs? You can get STDs from BJs also, such as herpes and genital warts. Damn these STDs suck. But they're here to stay.
As hard as it'll be, I'm planning on using condoms during oral sex as well as everything else, plus I don't plan on any deep kissing. I know it'll really take out the fun and spontaneity. Shit, it's going to be esp. tough when we shower and she wants to start sucking me or me to her!
Oral sex is my favorite too. Oh well. Can't take life time chances on a few hours of pleasure.
What do you mean "or me her?"
You eat out Bangkok *****s? That's disgusting.
Stinky
"Anyone try dipping their cock in vodka after a session?"
That question brings back very old memories. Long ago my condom once broke, so I pulled out immediately and looked out for some desinfection. Nothing else handy but a bottle of Mekhong. Put it over my best part and I can tell you it fucking burns. :( Avoid it if possible. Since that time I always carry some Betaisodonna with me.
Hi Gentlemen,
Which are the diseases we can take with a not-covered bj? I would like to know your points of view. Cause i hear for example risk about herpes,but how much is this risk? Do you think or it is scientific risk that also doctors agree? Or better how many girls have herpes in mouth? My little opinion is very high risk for every disease in sex without rubber,but very little risk with not-covered bj,but probably i am a little ignorant about it,so i am here to learn what i dont know or what i know wrong. Thanks all!
The traveller,
Please what is "betaisodonna"?
Lukasek,
I believe you mean what diseases and the risks of BJs w/o a condom? Well, many of course, especially in Thailand. I recently read in LOS travel guide that they adjust their population stats some %age due to mortality rates from AIDS! And how accurate do you think Thai health stats are going to be? The stats they have are just the reported or known cases. There's probably hundreds more that are unreported! Yikes!
The thing with most STDs is you usually don't see it with your naked eyes (or dicks). So, if you inspect the BGs mouth before she blows you and it looks clear, you're fooling yourself. By the time herpes makes itself visible in their mouth with those little bumpy protrusions, she's REALLY infected. She could be infected and not show those bumps yet, they're just not visible, but still very contagious. AND the fucked up thing with herpes is its not curable, you just itch, have burning [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url], and occasional discharges for the rest of your life. THAT SUCKS!
AND to top it off, it is still possible to contract HIV via oral sex, just not as likely as through intercourse. HIV only needs a portal of entry, like a membrane or broken skin. Her mouth is a perfect breeding ground for lots of germs...warm, moist, dark. Just like a girls little wet pussy.
Then there's also HPV. It's really not so bad for us men. We'll get little bumps on our Joes, nothing painful. But when we screw a girl, she gets infected, she'll likely only find out if she has a + pap smear, has to get the lesion or growth frozen or cauterized, but remains at higher risk for cervical cancer and urinary tract infections. So, if you get it, carry it back to your unsuspecting girlfriend or wife (or future gf/wife, what will you tell her?), then you and her are doomed. HPV also has no cure, just remission as with herpes.
So, cover up out there. Think with the head on your shoulders, not the one in the pants. It makes no sense to me to risk your lifetime for a few hours of pleasure!!!!
Wow, so many of the BGs and plenty of porn stars are walking germ specimens. Yikes again.
Holy shit, thats scary stuff.
Does that answer your questions?
Betadyne (or betadine) a modified iodine that doesn't "burn" when applied. Highly effective antiseptic, though - but it DOES stain brown
Hep C, while theoretically possible to get sexually is really not transmitted that way. It is almost entirely transmitted via blood. Hence it's why so many IVDA get it. All the strains of Hepatitis are pretty different. There are like 7 of them out there now (maybe more since I last checked).
Lukasek. It's difficult to assign absolute risk. The best we are doing is a poor guess. There are diseases that are relatively hard to get, esp by a bj. You can get oral to genital transmission of Herpes and in fact it has been proven that viral shedding occurs even when a person doesn't have symptoms (although the greatest chance occurs when s/he has those little clear bumps that are breaking with rich viral juice).
HOWEVER, it is also true that unless you are a monk, you have probably been exposed to Herpes multiple times. You kissing a chick, you going down on a chick, she going down on you, etc etc. Once you get it, you can't get rid of it.
Gonorrhea , you are not going to get going down unless you are already immunocompromised. Almost every case of oropharyngeal gonorrhea (of the throat) is due to someone already having a weakened immune system (like AIDS).
Genital warts largely transmitted by genital to genital contact, although it can be spread by other skin contact. You can get molluscum on your face, arms, you name it, but I've never seen it anywhere but the groin. You have to burn those fuckers off or use a chemical like Podophyllin. There is a new one called Aldara (I believe) that activates your own immune system to kill the viri. Molluscum unlike Herpes will go away on it's own, but it might take YEARS (who wants to wait?).
The reason being is that your oral mucosa is designed to fight infection. Easy to see why, no? There are cellular components present in your mouth that don't exist anywhere else. So unless you have a break, or really bad gum disease the chances are low. There is always a risk, no one can say never, but for me, I just dont enjoy a BJ with a rubber and with certain chicks I like DATY too much (and they do too) to give it up.
The sum total of STD's I think I ever had was one. I had some questionable burning after one trip where I stupidly boned like three chicks sans condom. I didn't go in for the smear. Just did the Cipro/Azithro combo (although some strains of Gon in Asia are Cipro resistant) and it went away. If I am banging away too much for too long I just get some local irritation that is not infectious.
The lavage method of Betadine, Alcohol whatever I sort of pooh-poohed but a microbiologist buddy of mine turned my thinking around on that a bit. But really dipping your wick only gets part of the outer urethra (the inner part of your crank). You really need to get something like a small bulb syringe and squirt that stuff up and let it dribble out. I'm not prepared to go through that, but there are some dudes that do.
Anything really that lowers your viral/bacterial 'load' (amount of whatever nasty you are exposed to) lowers your risk. Therefore even doing something like pissing after sex is not all that unreasonable, but will never afford you the protection of a condom.
Joe, not to be antagonistic, but the real reason Condoms are not 100% are almost all due to breakage. The people either had them and didn't use them or kept boning once they broke. Maybe that's what you meant and I'm sorry if I misunderstood (and if you don't know what I'm referring to, sorry I went back a few pages as I check in here every few months).
Again you get back to viral/bactierial load. While there are small amounts of viri/bacteria that can get through a condom (and it's very small) with very vigorous activity your exposure is so low that your chances are greatly reduced. Not zero but pretty damn close.
And before someone starts in on that old chestnut 'but the HIV virus is smaller than the latex pores' let me lay that one in the intellectual grave it deserves. HIV does not infect solo. It has to piggyback on other cells to infect you and these are far larger than the latex pores.
If you want to wrap yourself in latex you will probably have a safe time. A great time? No, but a safe one.
I think each one of us should make an educated guess (and educated means doing a lot more research than asking your buds on WSG what they think!!). For me, I am going to engage mostly in covered sex (unless I check it out first), kissing , DATY etc. There are just some acts that by their absence really kill the intimacy, which is why I travel 24 hours in a plane instead of banging my local streetwalker.
Now, anal rimming. Ugh. Ditto for anal sex. Nasty shit, literally. Some of the worst, most drug resistant bacteria reside up your ass. It's why when you get shot or stabbed in the gut it's not the wound that kills you, it's all the horrible bacteria that spill into your gut.
One post about Condom breakage. The real reason most condoms break is not the thinness of the condom.
The mortal enemies of condoms are time, heat and friction (light also but how they are packaged takes care of that). Usually dudes that have condoms break have not stored them properly (the worst example being the poor sap that stores one in his wallet 'just in case' ). If you want to keep them fresh, keep them cool.
The other thing is, use lube if she's not juiced up. I haven't had a condom break in freaking years, and the time I remember I was with a particularly unenthusiastic partner and I sort of remember just banging away. I was thinking "damn, this chick is dry!!" and bam, condom broke.
I also pretty much buy my supply of condoms for my trip and then buy about half again what I think I'll need. I really have trouble with them and about the only ones that work for me are made of polyurethane (like Trojan Supra). That stuff blows latex away. I think it has more to do with how it transmits heat than how thin it is, although obviously thickness has a good deal to do with heat transmission as well.
One of the best tips I heard was when someone recommended putting a drop of lube in the tip of the condom before you put it on. Damn, that really helps too!!
I remember one sad day when I ran out of jimmies in Pattaya 3 freaking days before I was set to leave. Here I am begging for a good condom from my fellow travellers. Now I just don't like the selection of condoms in Thailand (about as varied as the selection of beer there). So imagine my surprise when a marine gave me one of the govt issued ones. Fucking a, they REALLY don't like those guys to enjoy sex do they? I would have gotten more sensation by wrapping a Michelin around my crank.
Poobah, I agree wholeheartedly that the reasons condoms are not 100% is because of breakage (or other forms of incorrect usage.) That was, in fact, precisely my point.
And like you I've not had a condom break for years, and I use the precise approach you do. I'd go further and say that even if you've got a condom that's been stored incorrectly, the right kind and amount of lube (meaning water-based) will probably still keep it from breaking.
I follow a very simple, painless practice which helps me to at least FEEL safer. And I think it does protect me somewhat.
After sex, I [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] and take a shower, carefully washing my dick and the surrounding area with soap and hot water. While in the shower, I also take out my trusty bottle of hydrogen peroxide and liberally wash my dick (with special attention to the [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] hole) with this inexpensive, antiseptic solution. No burning, not expensive, not time consuming.
So far, no STDs, no problems at all.
Dear Gentlemen,
First of all my thanks for all yours answers!
I think I was a little naive, cause as most of italians my friends I had some cold-smart-proud italian girls and nothing more and it is only few years I started to spend better my juice LOL and to have better fun travelling to monger.
I always thought it was enough to use condom during sex, and not during BJ, to avoid 99% of the risks of sexual diseases, now I see I had big luck. I was in almost every state of east europe, in russia and in brasil, (where I broke the one and the only condom in all my life in few minutes cause during anal I used vaselina, I knew oil-based not good but it gave me the owner of night club together towels and condoms.) still not in Thai, but surely I will.
In your opinion how to compare the risks of sexual disease in Russia, Thai and for example Argentina? Where the highest?
Ouch me: yes you answered me totally, I knew partly what you wrote and I still wonder that seems to be two kind of world, one real word full of risks of sex-disease and the second where most of the friends of mine that use to have sex without and seems nobody never took nothing, even if surely who took disease is shy to speak about it, at least in old-mentality-church closed-italian-mentality-head about sex. What are HPV?
Dinghy: did you use betadyne sometimes? Or only read about it and I guess its use on penis?
Poobah: "I just don't enjoy a BJ with a rubber and with certain chicks I like DATY too much (and they do too) to give it up. "
I am TOTALLY agree with you, I have your same point of view about it. unluckily!
In brasil I had local irritation for a few days, 11 women in 23 days for me was too much. I was used to have 2 or 3 italians girls at year LOL, and I thought I took some disease cause I broke condom, so when I comeback I did "tampone uretrale" (sorry I don't know it in english) tests, 5 tamponi-HELL-of-pain, however I had nothing but I definetly think is inside uretra that bactery goes and give infection and not around glandes, so probably betadyne only make our blame little smaller, if we had BJ or sex uncovered, but it doesn't really help against diseases.
I totally agree also with you about to make personal research, about absence of acts kill intimacy, I think that if I will sit down for hours riding in car or waiting in plane, then I want at least taste BJ without, but surely sex with, even if I will do it much LESS frequently than before read all your answers!
Sorry I don't know what is "anal rimming"? And I don't understand your sentences about it, please could you explain it?
One more time, many thanks.
[size=-2][u]EDITOR's NOTE[/u]: [blue]Posting of this report was delayed pending revisions to [u]capitalize the word "I"[/u]. To avoid future delays, please use a capital "I" to refer to yourself in future reports. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue][/size]
It is also advisable to put some water-based lubricant, such as KY, on your tool before you cover it with the condom.
This has the following 2 advantages:
1. It increases greatly the sensation of pleasure during penetration –it is the closest I’ve ever seen to bareback sex.
2. It reduces the internal friction between the latex and your tool and as a result the chance of a breakage will be even more remote.
Poobah,
Are you in the medical field? Sounds like you know your shit. You are mostly in agreement with things I said. However, I'm not sure about your last explanation on herpes and repeated exposures. Are you implying that most of us have already been exposed orally to herpes and are just not showing symptoms yet? If so, then we (those of us that do oral sex) are all carriers even though asymptomatic, correct? Further, does that mean that we can begin to show symptoms some time down the road?
Herpes is not fun for sure, I mean no STD is. But herpes has no cure, spreads easily, and just makes you miserable. I hate this fact, esp since, like most of us out there, I love to eat raw fish! There's nothing like the taste, feel, and sound of a girl enjoying herself with my tongue action.
Shed some more light on this please. I'm very interested. I can resist some of the BJs to lessen my risk, but I find it REALLY hard not to eat fish with some beauty spread eagle in front of me.
That was a good point about the friction to the inside. Never thought of that!
Much thanks of all of you answer me! It seems I was a little naive.
Ouch me: Thank you guy for your long answer, but I don't know what is HPV? I have to say that i always had covered sex and only with bj I try to have it uncovered and until now i was in east europe, Russia and Brasil and never in Thai, where it seems to exists more risks? In, I hope, near future I hope to Thai too, now the fly from Italy are 350 euro with return.
Poobah:as you I had irritation local, after many garota in Brasil in few days, in that occasion I broke one rubber cause in night I use the one lub i found there, it was vaseline, yeah I know oil-based lubrificant. Never use it! It broke condom in 1-2 minutes! I came back home and i did tampon uretral, 5 hell of pain, only cause I had irritation cause different food, much alcool, much women, I took nothing luckily and yet now after one year no problem. However now i always covered sex and try to have not covered bj, even if now surely less than before read this reports of us because I totally agree with you that the absence of some acts kill the intimacy and if I travel so far when in Italy I can have SW for 30 euro, from Russia and all east europe. Is cause I would like ot have GFE and in my case means with not covered bj.
What is anal rimming?
I hope this post will be pubblicated,
Thanks!
Luca
[size=-2][u]EDITOR's NOTE[/u]: [blue]Posting of this report was delayed pending revisions to [u]capitalize the word "I"[/u]. To avoid future delays, please use a capital "I" to refer to yourself in future reports. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue][/size]
Lukasek,
There is no "pretty" way to say this. Anal rimming, is basically licking someone's asshole. This is also called "tossing the salad". IMHO, this is very dangerous except in a long-standing monogomous relationship. I would never consider performing this on a provider, but some providers will perform this on you (often negotiated in advance).
Luego
Scotty Monger thanks,
I did many times anal rimming when i lick her down without knew the name and i also think that good bj must have anal rimming. I didn't think it is so dangerous and if it is, why do you think not dangerous in monogamus relationship? I think bacterya are in every ass LOL. So you mean you can take infections if you lick for few minutes the ass of your woman, even if you lick the ass out and obviously not put the tongue inside it? Once more thanks!
Luca
You guys can wash your [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] holes with antiseptic all you want but for us uncercumicized assholes the HIV enters via that tender little inch beneath the forskin because it has no layer of keratin. Always wear a condom. And, even if youre drunk, careful when you take it off so you dont get her **** slime on your PP. Also, dont roll around in the sack with her if shes all wet and slimy. AND KEEP SPREADING THE WORD ABOUT ORAL HYGENE.
Lukasek
Betaisodona is an antiseptic The agent is a Poly(1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidon)-iodine-complex or in short PVP-Iodine. It's available as a salve, liquid soap and vaginal antiseptic.
The vaginal antiseptic is applicated with some sort of plastic bottle which you have to squeeze and turn around at the very same time. I used that stuff during my first years when HIV was still no prob and it probably protected me from some nasty diseases.
I remember that two friends of mine and me once went to Happy World in Bang Saen. That day we picked 17 girls in total. Since I had been there before some girls already knew me and also the oncoming procedure. They also promoted it to the other girls. I used to tell them that I was an ongoing doctor and that I will examine them for free. That was a picture, 17 naked girls lining up to get a free rinse by Doc Traveler :D
The Traveler,
Great great! You remind me when I was used to play with the girl lived in the house in front house of my grandmother to doctor and patient, but she was only one woman, I can only imagine how it was exiting that game for you! Great idea really.
Thanks for info on Betaisodona.
This was reporeted at Reuters on 10.19.2004:
CHAIYAPHUM - A one-legged German, accused of trying to infect nearly 100 teenage girls with HIV through unprotected sex, last night launched a tirade of abuse against Thai women, calling them "witches" and "monkeys".
Hans-Otto Schiemann, a 56-year-old former sailor from Schweinfurt in Bavaria, has become a figure of hate in northeastern Thailand, with posters plastered across the town of Chaiyaphum warning young women not to have sex with him.
Since Thailand has no laws dealing with people who deliberately infect others with the Aids virus, prosecutors have charged him only with immigration offences.
"Thai women are bad. Thai women are witches and they're monkeys," he told reporters outside the provincial court in Chaiyaphum, 340km northeast of Bangkok.
Residents say Schiemann, who has been in Thailand for much of the past decade, offered students aged from 15 to 17 around 4000 baht ($140) for sex as part of a campaign of vengeance against Thai women, whom he blames for his own HIV infection.
Sura Wisedsak, of the provincial health office, said that according to Schiemann's wife as many as 90 women had been deliberately exposed to HIV. If their other sexual partners were taken into account, the number of victims could be as high as 500.
Schiemann, who refused a prison blood test to confirm his HIV status, admitted he had HIV but said he had done nothing wrong, and had merely been an attractive figure in the relatively impoverished region because of his wealth.
He accused his Thai wife, Jiraporn Paktaku, who has Aids, of being part of a campaign to get him kicked out of the country. He is charged with overstaying a month-long tourist visa. The case has been adjourned until November 15.
The German Version Can be read here:
[url]http://www.bild.t-online.de/BTO/news/2004/10/19/thai-maedchen/thai-maedchen__s__ex__seppel.html[/url]
I am in the LOS about every 4 months for about 1 week. Does anyone know where you can get a VD check up to see if you picked up anything. I got gonnorea one time and didn't find out until I got back to the US about 2 weeks latter. Still don't know who gave it to me.
[QUOTE=Member #2745]I am in the LOS about every 4 months for about 1 week. Does anyone know where you can get a VD check up to see if you picked up anything. I got gonnorea one time and didn't find out until I got back to the US about 2 weeks latter. Still don't know who gave it to me.[/QUOTE]
There are quite a lot of clinics advertising both tests for HIV and other VD along sukhumwit and everywhere in pattaya. The quality of these clinics can vary a great deal.
Your best shot would be to visit one of the bigger hospitals and get your test done there. In bangkok i can recmend bumrungrad - [url]http://www.bumrungrad.com/[/url] . Very good also by western standard, cheap compared to the west but expensive by thai standards.
In pattaya the bangkok - pattaya hospital seems to have the best reputation - [url]http://www.bph.co.th/pages/main.html[/url] .
Compared to the rest of south east asia thailand have got top notch healthcare - if you have to money to pay for it.
Does anybody try Kamagra Oral Jelly ?
It is a liquid gel selled in BKK and in Pattaya as single dose containing 5 mg. of Sildenafil Citrate equivalent to Sildafenil 100 mg wich is the same component of Viagra.It comes from India and should be the gel's version of Viagra,faster with less side effect.
I've founded Kam. for 100 bath.Personally I've tried it and ..yes it works faster but it seems to be not so stronger than the original Viagra from Pfizer.:confused:
Where can I get a one day HIV test in Thailand (for the hooker that I want to do)? About how much?
What about Viagra? Where can it be bought if I want to have an over the top experience?
Please send all replies to my private message box.
Clandestine
Do a short forum search and you will find lots of info regarding those two issues.
Anyway, Viagra and the like can be bought in most pharmacies. Almost all along Sukhumvit have it.
I recommend the Bumrungrad in BKK and the PIC hospital in Pattaya for a HIV test which will set you back around 1000-1500 baht.
A test might give some sort of quite doubtful "security". Do you intend to go bareback after a negative test of your lady of the night ?
If yes, you must be crazy. As you might know, the test will only detect antibodies, not the virus itself. So being tested negative doesn't mean to be HIV free. If she got infected less than three months ago the test still might be negative but she is already carrying the virus.
Better be safe than sorry and ALWAYS wear a raincoat.
Clandestine:
1. Also, pay a bit more and get all the hepatitis tests done.
2. The Traveller is right in his advice.
3. Advice like this belongs on the public forum, not in your private mailbox.
Clandestine
Domino's hint is worth to think about, there are more dangers than just HIV.
Even though many people have had Hepatitis A without knowing - cause no symptoms at all - a Hep. B or C infection is nothing you would like to bring home. No alcohol and a special diet without spice and fat for several months is just the smallest prob.
Let's not forget one of the oldest VDs, syphilis. The prob with it is, that the first symptoms aren't serious and often misinterpreted. The virus may rest for years and even decades but without appropriate treatment at the right time it will be back and do great damage.
So again, NEVER go uncovered and try to avoid any unnecessary contact with body fluids of any kind !
[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4032699.stm[/url]
This HIV article has some good links for anyone interested.
The hepatitis tests take a day longer to get the results. Sinking your dick into these women is playing Russian Roulette. I am off to the casino now. Update will follow when next I cross the bridge.
Hi All,
Just wondering if anyone has some current information regarding tpyical Viagra or Kamagra prices in Bangkok (Sukhumvit Area). I have not read anything new for a while.
Thanks,
Dedalus
Dedalus,
I bought it only once to give it a try, had to pay 600 for some indian stuff in a pharmacy in soi 23, just behind the 7-11. Viagra was somewhat more expensive, around 1000+ as far as I remember.
I would rather invest the money in a better looking girl or someone with great attitude and skills or both, this is my "Viagra" :D
Traveler,
Much obliged. Your last point is a valid one.
Dedalus
From CNN's web-site:
"One in 60 people out of the country's population of 62 million are infected with HIV. About one in 10 of those are between the ages of 15 and 24".
Scary stuff.
this from the ap:
rutgers researchers may have stopped hiv
pirep001away, n.j. — researchers at rutgers university have developed a trio of drugs they believe can destroy hiv, the virus that causes aids, according to a published report.
the drugs, called dapys, mimic the virus by changing shape, which enables them to interfere with the way hiv attacks the immune system.
tests conducted in conjunction with johnson and johnson have shown the drug to be easily absorbed with minimal side effects. it also can be taken in one pill, in contrast to the drug cocktails currently taken by many aids patients.
“this could be it,” stephen smith, the head of the department of infectious diseases at saint michael's medical center in newark, said. “we're all looking for the next class of drugs.”
a research team led by rutgers chemist eddy arnold pre-published details of the most promising of the three drugs, known as r278474, last month in the electronic edition of the journal of medicinal chemistry. full details will be published in the journal in early 2005.
dr. arnold, 47, has worked at dismantling the aids virus over the last 20 years. he uses x-ray crystallography, a technique to determine the structure of molecules, the smallest particles that can retain all the characteristics of an element or compound.
the research has targeted reverse transcriptase, a submiscroscopic protein composed of two coiled chains of amino acids. it is considered hiv's key protein.
“reverse transcriptase is very important in the biology of aids,” dr. smith said. “if you can really inhibit reverse transcriptase, you can stop aids.”
the optimism about r278474 stems from its potential to interfere with an enzyme that the virus needs to copy and insert itself into a human cell.
“we're onto something very, very special,” dr. arnold said.
dr. arnold established his lab at rutgers' center for advanced biotechnology and medicine in 1987. his current 30-member research team is partnered with johnson and johnson subsidiaries janssen pharmaceutica and tibotec-virco nv.
an important advancement in dr. arnold's research came in 1990 when belgian scientist paul janssen was added to the collaboration. dr. janssen, considered a drug pioneer, published a paper that year that described a new drug that blocked reverse transcriptase but caused resistant strains of the virus to pop up too quickly.
dr. janssen sought out dr. arnold, who used crystallography to detail the structure of rt. their work ultimately led to the rt inhibitors.
“we may eventually win the war against hiv/aids. that would be an extremely rewarding and satisfying outcome,” dr. arnold said.
Hello guys,
I do not want to spoil anyone's gusto but some very basic reserach about HIV and STD's was enough to scare the shit out of me.
I always had condom during sex but does any veteran over here came across any data showing the probability of getting HIV through oral sex? does DFK have any risk?
These questions might seem stupid, should have thought about the consequances before doing the act and I will have the test to be sure but there is this 3 month period that you should wait. It is too long to spend worrying.
I will appreciate your comments.
Thank you
Atre
I've RTFF :)
From what I know, you cannot contract HIV from a BJ but you can get other less damaging STD's... I think.
But always, always use a good quality condom for fucking.
juice
Contracting HIV from a BBBJ is extremely unlikely, it’s like being struck by lightning, but as you know some people are actually struck by lightning now and then.
The risk appears when your hired mouth has open sores or a bleeding area (by the teeth, lips or wherever).
I remember one occasion in the Sacred City of Pattaya when, after a long BBBJCIM, the Beach Road worker took a towel and wiped millions of spermatozoa from her mouth. When she left the towel I noticed some small red stains on it, I asked her what it was and she pointed to her lower lip: I looked at it and it was bleeding slightly. The BBBJCIM had been so long that her lip had started to bleed! She had been blowing me bareback while her blood was coming out!
I knew that had been a high-risk experience and there was the chance of contracting HIV as well as other less serious shits.
Anyway, this was a few years ago and all my regular STD tests since then have been fine.
I keep enjoying BBBJ’s as usual, because after all we only live once.
Atreides75, the real worry with BBBJ is not HIV, which as the previous two replies have noted is something an extremely low probability in this instance, but with genital herpes, gonorrhea, and genital warts (among other things) which can all be contracted via oral sex. All of these except for herpes are also relatively low in probability, but they definitely can still happen, as I will personally attest, having gotten the clap from a LOS BBBJ.
Did you get a refund from the girl that gave you the clap?
:D
juice
LOL, unfortunately, I was elsewhere by the time the affliction became apparent, as is generally the nature of these little things.
Besides, from a contractual perspective, one could say she gave all she promised, she just gave a little more than was desired...
Yep, she sure gave you all she "had" :)
juice
Actually, I heard that if you simply cross your fingers while you have sex you really wont catch any diseases.
Just a tip.
sukhumvit, one big nightlife and prostitution area?
sukhumvit has long been housing nana plaza, soi cowboy and thermae about right in the middle between the other two main entertainment areas. beerbars at nana plaza in front of the ground floor a-go-go bars are the rule, and soi zero under the highway has been around also for quite a few years now(though never very successful)
about two years ago clinton plaza, close to thermae, became a major attempt at creating another a-go-go entertainment place, located just 50 meters from sukhumvit road, in a prime location. however, due to 'legal' problems and a tendency by bar managers to charge high prices, it never really took off, and remains a secondary venue.
the last couple of years also saw the development of a beerbar area close to soi cowboy on the corner between asoke road and sukhumvit road. various sections of the rather large area are known as asoke plaza, and asoke corner. an (in) famous bar called [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord901][CodeWord901][/url], apparently specializes in 'deep throat' like activities.
just recently on the opposite side of the road from thermae, at so called sukhumvit square a new assortment of beer bars are developing. sukhumvit square started of as an agglomerate of shops selling various thai art and handicrafts. probably the shops did not make enough money to pay the rent, and developing a new area for the girls to ply their trade, seemed to be a solution for that problem. quite a few larger sized bars there, mostly in open air, with some attractive girls.
this proliferation of beerbars and also of 'traditional thai massage' places, certainly has something to do with the economic crisis that developed in the years following 1997. on the other hand, more and more tourists are coming to thailand, creating a enlarging market for prostitution in various forms.
what is certainly new the last few years is active freelancer activity throughout central sukhumvit. girls are 'available' in front of robinson department store, close to ambassador hotel, and on the other side of the road, in front of pacific place (close to landmark hotel). furthermore, quit a few girls take up position in the evening and night, between soi 3 and soi 5 (soi foodland). when walking at night in between soi cowboy and nana plaza, it is quite impossible for male wanderers, not to get various propositions. katoeys are around close to nana intersection and in front of ambassador (there is a narrow passage in between ambassador entrance and a tourist information kiosk, where a lot of them are located). at night some of them seem to prefer the pedestrian bridge crossings. watch out for your wallet!
the foodland area at night has become a place where quite few unsavory characters hang out, including prostitutes, pimps, mobile telephone 'operators' etc.
all in all, central sukhumvit road, in between nana plaza and soi cowboy, a stretch of road about 1.5 km long, has become one large entertainment area with lots of beerbars and freelance prostitutes. it is quite puzzling why the development of a freelance market is being tolerated by the authorities, especially in view of the crackdown on other parts of the entertainment scene (go-go bars at nana plaza in particular). for sure sukhumvit is becoming an area of low grade criminality. hopefully this development does not go much further. unfortunately, police in bangkok have a habit of either driving around on motorcycles or directing traffic (or sitting in the traffic control boxes). not much walking around, checking out the area. just a few policemen walking down the sidewalk of sukhumvit, would do wonders in controlling the illegal activities going on there.
besides the description above it has to be noted that pornographic material is widely displayed and available on the sidewalk. while certainly illegal, there seems to be no enforcement fo the law.
nottinon,
no criticism intended but where did you copy that article from ?
it's quite outdated, the bar area at asoke corner is (almost) gone, [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord900][CodeWord900][/url] isn't there anymore, it moved to soi 8 and clinton is history as well, just the bars in front are still there the part in the back is closed or gone too
btw, lots of police in civil clothes in the suk area. they mostly target drugs but will arrest pickpockets as well if they can catch one (only at night, during day time it seems to be too hot :()
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Nottinon,
no criticism intended but where did you copy that article from ?
[/QUOTE]
If do a search on Google, or other search engines, and include a whole sentence enclosed in quotes, it will bring up a hit in many cases.
In this case, it brought up this site:
[url]http://www.bangkokbargirls.info/articles.asp[/url]
I have been coming to sukumvit area for some 25 years at least 3 times a year, what you are describing is about 3 years old, back then you could walk from grace hotel soi3 up to ambassador hotel ,pass some 100 russian girls and many more thail girls all freelancing and some thai girls with momason. grace was full of freelancers from 24:00 to 04:00 hrs. also, chinatown area was full of girls in afternoon, A crackdown begain by thaksin some 5 months before apec The plain cloths cops would help round up the girls, take them to police station demand money for release, the stuoid girls would claim they need to work here to pay for baby moma etc, same story they us guys.. (thaksin wanted to convince foreign business men that bangkok had no street walkers?.) the crack down continued but not as fierce after apec. I was here in december 04 , there was police activity then I left for pp day before tsunami, came back in january for 2 weeks and I saw no police activity. I just came back this week and I here the police haven't been around for a while so I think it took a tsunami for thaksin to realize thailand needs the sex industry.
Gentlemen (if such exist): Plese ocnvey this news to any loose ladies of your acquaintance. I do not want them losing their teeth, even though I am partial to bbbjs by toothless wonders. A concerned John T Domino
[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/4335939.stm[/url]
Lip piercings 'can shrink gums'
Having a lip piercing is bad for the gums and can make them shrink back from the teeth, dentists warn. The longer people wear the piercing, the worse the recession is, researchers from Ohio State University in the US found - in a study of 58 young adults.
The British Dental Association reported in its official journal in 2003 of the same risk with tongue piercings. Oral piercing - a trend growing in popularity - can cause life-threatening infections and reactions, it said.
It will only be one or two teeth affected - but they are front teeth, so not ones you want to lose UK dental expert Professor Jimmy Steele, from Newcastle University The Ohio team said that people with lip piercings were far more likely to have receding gums than those without piercings.
Gum recession is associated with gum disease, which can cause the loss of teeth that are otherwise healthy.
When the dental researchers examined the young people's mouths they found average recession depth was more than double in those with piercings, compared with those without piercings.
Dr Dimitris Tatakis and his team presented their findings at a conference of the International & American Association for Dental Research.
Tooth loss
Professor Jimmy Steele, from Newcastle University's Dental School in the UK, said people who had, or were considering getting, a lip piercing should take heed of the findings. "The metal of the lip stud is physically rubbing over the gum at the neck of the tooth causing the gum to recede.
"Once this has happened, you don't get the gum back and it often becomes more difficult to clean and therefore even more prone to gum disease in the future. The effect is quite localised so it will only be one or two teeth affected - but they are front teeth, so not ones you want to lose."
He said it was only really a problem for long-term wearers.
He said taking the stud or ring out at night time and making sure the teeth were really clean would help reduce the risk of complications.
not sure if i should post this under safe sex or not. but it will touch on some safe sex topics. i went to angel witch, nep on the 8th of april. i met a real sweet warm cutie. cut to the chase, i bar fined her. while she is getting changed into street clothes i pop a quarter of a 100mg viagra. i doubt that i’m going to need it. but i wanted a hard-on that could drive railroad spikes. we get back to my room and after the showers and some fooling around i reach for a condom. i started with a durex color and flavor condom for oral. as i roll it on i notice that it seems really tight. it’s a little painful to roll it on. but i ignore that. the blowjob was good. we fool around some more. i reach for a kimono ultra thin condom to replace the durex for the main event. as i roll this one on i notice that it too is too tight. i also see a little bruising on the shaft about a ½ inch below the head. i ignore that in anticipation of the main event. i’m using astroglide lube. we start and damn her pussy is so so tight. we go through some positions and eventually work our way to doggie. i get a little too aggressive i think. i miss the mark.
the condom doesn’t slip but catches on her skin. i know that i’ve bent it a bit too much. but i don’t really think too much of it. then as i try to re-enter her from behind i feel pain at the base of the head. i pull out altogether and take a real close look. i see a little blood in the condom. now that sends me from 0 to freaked real quick. i jump out of bed and head to the bathroom to take a closer look. i take the condom off. i take a quick shower washing the important parts. then i fill the condom with water to see if i can find any holes. i find no leaks in the condom. then i take a close look at my dick. the top 1/3 of the head is bruised. a nice dark bruise is forming on both sides of the shaft, but mostly on the right side. it appears that i tore a very tiny bit of skin at the tip of the urethra. she freaked out a lot less than i did but my jumping out of bed did scare her a bit. she took a quick shower. i then explain what happened and that we can’t have sex. we spent the night together. it was very s/o like.
in the morning i enjoy her body and do the best i can to make her feel good. it was pretty hot turning her on knowing that i wasn’t going to have sex with her. though i really wish i could have. for the next 2 days it burns when i [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord111][CodeWord111][/url] and when the [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] comes in contact with the cut. [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord112][CodeWord112][/url] reopens the cut so that i see a drop or two of blood when i [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord111][CodeWord111][/url]. the cut healed just fine in 2 days. the bruise faded completely within 10 days. i still can get a normal erection but feel just a hint of pain still at the base of the head. i think the pain will fade away altogether in a couple more days. this experience pretty much ruined my mongering while on vacation. i just wasn’t comfortable having sex with a dick that was in less then tip top shape. not to mention it hurt a little when i had a hard-on. i didn’t have sex again for the rest of the trip. however two days after getting bent i bar fined a girl in phuket. her name was tar and damn she was… i could fall in love. but i’m not going to do that. i don’t have her number or email and i’m back in the states. anyway, we didn’t have sex for the reasons listed above. but she did give me a handjob. though the hard-on hurt a bit, it felt great while getting a handjob. it was perhaps the best orgasm i had in years. i damn near drowned the girl in a massive facial.
anyone else experience anything like this? i think the viagra, the tight condoms and too little lube resulted in increased wear and tear on the woman maker. what do you think? would you have been comfortable having sex if you faced similar circumstances?
Were can I get my HIV test in Udon Thani?
This is not a mongering report but I want to share what I saw in Udon. I'm here visting a friend I met so I have not been out mongering.
We went to visit her family in outside of Udon (Nang Bua Lam Phu). In her little village of about 100 people there were two women with aids and there husbands and children had it also. One of them said they got it from her husband who also worked at a bar.
It was so scary to see this up close that it scared the hell out of me. It made me regret everytime I didn't use a condom.
When I was in pattaya I would ask farangs who lived there if aids is a problem and everybody said no. I wonder if it's becuase no one talks abot it when they get it.
Anyway I just wanted to share this. Its "up to you " what this all means.
I was so scared yesterday when we went to the hopital to get are blood test. We are both clean for HIV and Hep A. Hep B took to long for the results so I passed since I won't be here that long.
Good Luck All.
Fly for Thai,
Please get STD checked. I recently got one - chlamydia. But I will live.
70% of US population has STDs but they do not know it. Especially common among teens. Much more common among SW and mongers, I bet. The statistic is huge but true. I did not know until my doctor here in the USA told me so.
I always use a condom for FS as well as BJ. Only on one occasion did I have a BBBJ for 15 sec or so. Yet I caught it. Apparently chlamydia bacteria also resides in the throat and I do enjoy kissing during FS. Maybe that's how I got it.
Please practice safe sex guys.
[QUOTE=Gladiator]Contracting HIV from a BBBJ is extremely unlikely, it’s like being struck by lightning, but as you know some people are actually struck by lightning now and then.
The risk appears when your hired mouth has open sores or a bleeding area (by the teeth, lips or wherever).
I remember one occasion in the Sacred City of Pattaya when, after a long BBBJCIM, the Beach Road worker took a towel and wiped millions of spermatozoa from her mouth. When she left the towel I noticed some small red stains on it, I asked her what it was and she pointed to her lower lip: I looked at it and it was bleeding slightly. The BBBJCIM had been so long that her lip had started to bleed! She had been blowing me bareback while her blood was coming out!
I knew that had been a high-risk experience and there was the chance of contracting HIV as well as other less serious shits.
Anyway, this was a few years ago and all my regular STD tests since then have been fine.
I keep enjoying BBBJ’s as usual, because after all we only live once.[/QUOTE]Gladiator,
Would you be giving us the same advice "you only live once" even if you had an STD? Well, if you only live once don't you want to live longer?
I got a bloody STD and I can tell you, I'd rather be impotent than to have HIV or even herpes. That will ruin your libido and much more.
Please do CBJ. Not that much different in feeling but do yourself and the girl that favor. Remember that if she does BBBJs, one thing is definitely true:
1) Either she already has a major STD and now using a condom is "up to you"
2) She has definitely sucked someone who has HIV. Do you want to share the same mouth? Remember that she gets around 20 clients per month and one of them will have the HIV. 14 out of 20 have some form of STD anyway.
If you want to gamble with your life do so. But do not do that if you are married and still mongering. You owe that to your wife (and kids).
[QUOTE=Johnson45]
When I was in pattaya I would ask farangs who lived there if aids is a problem and everybody said no. I wonder if it's becuase no one talks abot it when they get it.
[/QUOTE]
Johnson,
yes, that's the reason and you better be safe than sorry. Do always wear a condom !!!
I used to know two HIV positive girls myself. They caught it after they had been with me, but I tested anyway for peace of mind. One died several years ago and the other one left for good, don't know if she is still alive or not.
It's easy for the girls to avoid tests at gogos and MPs. They take a day off or pay the doc for a negative result. Freelancers and bar girls do not test at all. Nobody really knows the current rate of infection but I wouldn't dare to go bareback.
Furthermore given the time the body needs to develop antibodies after an infection, a test might be negative even though the girl carries the virus. So a monthly test doesn't help much.
I sometimes even test if they would allow me to have intercourse without protection. If they do not insist on a condom and would allow me to do it without protection, I immediately pay them and send them off. If they would do it with me, then they do it with others too.
[QUOTE=The Traveler] If they would do it with me, then they do it with others too.[/QUOTE]So many of them let me go bare back in Pattay about 6 months ago. Some of them I even pressured in to it. I feel bad about this now. They can be talked into it and its up to us to not do that.
It is very easy to have condomless sex in Thailand, for many reasons:
1. many girls do not care much, it is in their mentality to be fatalistic and fun-loving.
2. if you go to MPs that cater to the Asian market, condom use is not so frequent, as many Asian men do not want to use it. (They seem to believe AIDS is a Farang thing, that is why many such places are Asian only).
3. Girls can be carried away by the moment and lose sight of whether you use a condom or not.
4. if you are with a girl for some time, she will easily consider that she is your GF, and in their mind GF sex is condomless. "Some time" might mean several days, or just the second shot of the first encounter.
For all those reasons, you should never count on the girl to be the one enforcing safe sex. You are in charge, and you need to be strong enough to use condoms in all circumstances, because the choice is often entirely yours. Or else, you are into risk management area ...
[QUOTE=Fly for Thai]Anyone else experience anything like this? [/QUOTE]Last time I was in LOS for a month I took viagra all the time and got large bulging vain that didn't go down. Luckly it went down went I went back home. It took about three or four days of no viagra before it went down. It didn't hurt.
Seydlitz,
good to see you back, hope everything we were talking about in our last mails went out fine.
I agree with all you said, but most girls I have been with - who cater the farang section of the sex biz - do actually insist on protection. They will provide BBBJ, but no fun without a condom.
These girls are well aware about the risks and do realize that they are the main source of income for their families which has to be protected.
[QUOTE=MS Clive]I was bitten by the STD bug recently. Not a major one really: Chlamydia. Apparently 70% of the women in US have it. It is more common among teenagers. The symptoms are so often ignorable that patients do not know it.
I usually practice very safe sex: no BBBjs for me.
I may have let go a bit in BKK with a go-go girl who gave me a BBBJ for around 15 sec before the CBJ. I do not know if I was already infected but either I infected her or she infected me.
Never mongered since Jan 1st week of 2005.[/QUOTE]LOL- a taste of Chlamydia is good for you- nothing like Urethritis to help you repent sins. Plus, that uthethral swab sort of feels nice too.
Chlamydia is a good and relatively painless lesson, that could scare you just enough to stop you catching something worse in the future.
It is extremely difficult to catch this from oral so I doubt you caught it from the go-go-oral.
I didn't realise anyone actually did CBJs, I thought it was an urban myth. I've not once in my life had a CBJ.
Chlamydia is not only rife in Thailand, but also like you say in the US, and everywhere else. A recent study in the UK found that one in eight men, and one in ten women tested positive for Chlamydia. The figures were even higher for teenagers.
The biggest problem with Chlamydia is that 50% of men and 70% of women are asymptomatic, ie- they have no idea they have it. This is one good reason to visit a GUM clinic every so often, even if all seems happy downstairs. And if you test positive a mere seven to ten days on Doxycycline will calm the storm.
Hope your cock feels better soon and may your passion for mongering return with a vengeance.
[QUOTE=Member #2967] Chlamydia is a good and relatively painless lesson,.... And if you test positive a mere seven to ten days on Doxycycline will calm the storm.[/QUOTE]
Painless? Well so is pissing razor blades:)
a mere seven to ten days: it depends on the actual dose. Lots of Thai skanks are very dirty down there as they fuck through their illnesses and Thailand is well known for its virulent strains. Many of the hookers probably never get properly cleaned up at all. Skanking remains a risky proposition.
As an aside to all this: when one drinks water in Thai bars as Skinles does, the staff often think it is because you are infected as that is the reason most expats drink water. Maybe something to think of if you are trying to proposition a skanky Thai barmaid.
Domino - really on the water?
I rarely drink anything except water or mixed water/something not sweet. To appease 1 bar owner, I actually had a beer (after I had eeen going there for a week) She was surprised
Much alcohol tends to cause "other" problems with my metabolism, but lots of fluids is good
(40 odd years ago, I had the occassion in PigAlley in Paris to unfortunate with a good looking French piece who gave me the gift that keeps on giving. - Been there, done that - wished I hadn't done her at all)
[QUOTE=Domino]
As an aside to all this: when one drinks water in Thai bars as Skinles does, the staff often think it is because you are infected as that is the reason most expats drink water.
[/QUOTE]
Domino,
where is the connection between drinking water and having a STD/VD ?
I understand that someone has to avoid alcohol if he got hepatitis, but water is just a soft drink. Hepatitis in a certain stage can easily be determined (or guessed) by the color of your eyes. Guess that's a better sign than drinking water.
Dinghy,
I guess you are talking about herpes. It usually only breaks out if your immune system is weakened by something else.
I have heard that liquorice can be of help. Something in there - I forgot the name of the ingredient - is able to kill the herpes viruses. It's no cure for it, but give it a try.
Drinking lots of water flushes the system and so clap carriers should drink lots of it. (Look at the posts in the overall safe sex section right now). The barrack room humor of Bkk's ex pat drinkers give rise to the comments about water drinkers in bars plus, no doubt, the many times they catch a dose. I mainly drink water and so the skanks call me water boy. Blueberry is a recommended drink too. I got the water and blueberrry advice from doctors btw.
I cannot comment on herpes except to say it has no known cure. Touch wood, I have not contracted it and so I have not looked at the old wive's "cures" concerning it.
Chlamydia
Chlamydial infection is caused by a bacterium, Chlamydia trachomatis. Like gonorrhea, it's easily transmitted by sex without a condom, including oral sex and anal sex. Unlike gonorrhea, a chlamydial infection usually has no symptoms, or else very mild symptoms.
Chlamydia is the most common STD in the U.S. caused by a bacterium.
The symptoms of a chlamydial infection are usually slight pain during urination or a slight discharge, early in the infection, usually within one to three weeks after infection. Many people have no symptoms. For those who do, the symptoms usually go away until the disease reaches an advanced stage and causes inflammation and pain around the testicles or in the female reproductive system or swelling of the lymph nodes. By then, if not treated soon, the female or the male may become sterile.
A pregnant woman can easily pass the infection on to the eyes of her baby during delivery, causing a serious eye infection and possibly blindness. Chlamydia may also show up as pneumonia in the baby within 3 to 6 weeks of birth.
To determine whether you have a chlamydia infection, the doctor needs to take a smear from the urethra of the man or the vagina of the female and perform tests. It should be determined whether what you have is gonorrhea or chlamydia or non-specific urethritis (NSU), or a combination thereof.
A simple regimen of certain antibiotics usually knocks off chlamydia.
The best site I've found to date on gonorrhea is the U.S. National Institute of Health's web page at [url]http://www.niaid.nih.gov/factsheets/stdclam.htm[/url]
juice
Molluscum Contagiosum ("the clam")
Molluscum contagiosum, also known as "the clam", is a recently recognized STD that is not well understood. After a friend notified me of this one (who picked it up from a prostitute on Sukhumvit) and reading a lot of literature on this one, here's what I've put together:
A small bump appears on the skin. It can be on the scrotum or penis or anywhere in the genital area. In the center of the bump is what looks like a pimple but is not a pimple. The skin is moist around the bump, within a radius of a couple of centimeters, when it first comes out. It doesn't hurt or itch. It's fairly benign, but it grows a little for a few weeks to a few months, and then goes away. Apparently, the body fights it off. It generally does not recur. My friend's doctor cut out the central pimple, which turned out to be a hard white bump, as the doctor says that if you don't cut that out, then it will get a lot bigger and take longer to go away. His doctor said he had seen a lot of cases of molluscum contagiosum in farangs on Sukhumvit over the last year. My friend said that the bump that the doctor cut healed up real fast, but two other bumps showed up on his scrotum without the central pimple, and grew for a couple of months, then went away entirely.
There is no medicinal treatment for molluscum. From what I've read on Internet, the doctor usually doesn't do anything surgically, either, unlike what the doctor on Sukhumvit did. However, my friend said that after the central white dot was cut out, the moisture and some other symptoms were reversed and went away quickly.
On the Internet, many people have expressed that sexual desire was unusually and significantly increased during the early stages of mollusca and/or while the bump is present. The speculation is that there has been a natural selection process in which the molluscum promotes its own spreading by making the host more sexually active.
No known negative effects of mollusca are known yet, and indeed not much is known about it.
The best source of information on the web on mollusca that I've found so far is on [url]http://www.syntac.net/dl/Clam/[/url] but I've noted that it's starting to show up in medical sites for consumers, albeit more formally and with less information.
juice
Juice,
"Making the host more sexually active" and "No known negative effects of mollusca are known yet"
Sounds like fun:D!
I thought it was funny too...:D
juice
This a a good web-site for Molluscum Contagiosum information.
[url]http://www.patient.co.uk/showdoc/23068963/[/url]
Especially amusing are the list of treatments. But, if you happen to find one on your weiner DO NOT use any method other than the liquid nitrogen.
These aren't too common on the penis, they normally occur on the torsos of children. But it is the sort of thing you could easily pick up if you're a BB fan.
In France they actually eat the liquid contained inside.
Domino,
I am also a "water boy". I never drink any alcohol at home and extremely seldom on holidays. I guess any average British guy drinks more beer at one day than I had during my whole life. Alcohol doesn't taste to me and beer has the unpleasent effect that I have to go to the restroom very often.
That liquorice is able to kill herpes viruses is no "old wive's cure". It was detected some time ago, but anybody who wants to try that got to be careful. A high dosis of glycyrrhizin, which is an antiviral agent that can derived from the roots of the liquorice plant, can kill you. It might also be effective against HIV, SARS, cancer and other diseases caused by viruses.
[url]http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/GE0503/S00014.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.advancesinlifescience.com/features_19.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.news-medical.net/?id=8115[/url]
[url]http://www.nutraingredients.com/news/news-ng.asp?id=58452-liquorice-compound-may[/url]
[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4307907.stm[/url]
Domino,
I am also a "water boy". I never drink any alcohol at home and extremely seldom on holidays. I guess any average British guy drinks more beer at one day than I had during my whole life. Alcohol doesn't taste to me and beer has the unpleasent effect that I have to go to the restroom very often.
That liquorice is able to kill herpes viruses is no "old wive's cure". It was detected some time ago, but anybody who wants to try that got to be careful. A high dosis of glycyrrhizin, which is an antiviral agent that can derived from the roots of the liquorice plant, can kill you. It might also be effective against HIV, SARS, cancer and other diseases caused by viruses.
[url]http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/GE0503/S00014.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.advancesinlifescience.com/features_19.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.news-medical.net/?id=8115[/url]
[url]http://www.nutraingredients.com/news/news-ng.asp?id=58452-liquorice-compound-may[/url]
[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4307907.stm[/url]
[QUOTE=MS Clive] Gladiator,
Would you be giving us the same advice "you only live once" even if you had an STD?[/QUOTE]
Yes, why not?
[QUOTE=MS Clive] Well, if you only live once don't you want to live longer?[/QUOTE]
Not necessarily, I think a shorter but more pleasurable life is preferable to a longer but more boring one.
[QUOTE=MS Clive] I got a bloody STD and I can tell you, I'd rather be impotent than to have HIV or even herpes. That will ruin your libido and much more.[/QUOTE]
I’d rather have any STD than be impotent.
[QUOTE=MS Clive]Please do CBJ. Not that much different in feeling but do yourself and the girl that favor. Remember that if she does BBBJs, one thing is definitely true:
1) Either she already has a major STD and now using a condom is "up to you"
2) She has definitely sucked someone who has HIV. Do you want to share the same mouth? Remember that she gets around 20 clients per month and one of them will have the HIV. 14 out of 20 have some form of STD anyway.
If you want to gamble with your life do so. But do not do that if you are married and still mongering. You owe that to your wife (and kids). [/QUOTE]
I find CBJ’s very different in feeling, that’s why - as many other mongers - I prefer to increase my risk exposure.
In any case, there is no universal truth in this matter: you have to do a risk-reward analysis, evaluate your own personal situation and take the right decision based on your target rewards and the level of risk that you are willing to take. After doing this analysis, whatever decision you make (whether it involves BBBJ, CBJ or no BJ at all) will be the right decision.
Always, always use them...
juice
When I was in Bangkok 2 months ago, in both occasions when I went to Nana Plaza by taxi, both the taxi drivers kept saying the girls there are 'dirty' and I should go to better places. Not sure how true this is or they simply tries to take me somewhere that they can get a commission.
[QUOTE=W169]Both the taxi drivers kept saying the girls at Nana are 'dirty' and I should go to better places. Not sure how true this is or they simply tries to take me somewhere that they can get a commission.[/QUOTE]Both reasons.
The girls at Nana ARE dirty, most Thai guys wouldn't go near them. NEP is full of girls who aren't attractive to kohn Thai.
But, yes, the taxi drivers are also keen for commissions.
[QUOTE=Coma Boy]Both reasons.
The girls at Nana ARE dirty, most Thai guys wouldn't go near them. NEP is full of girls who aren't attractive to kohn Thai.
But, yes, the taxi drivers are also keen for commissions.[/QUOTE]
CB
Pardon my ignorance but could you define DIRTY in the context mentioned above.
Duni
Hi Duni.
It wasn't meant as an insult, I love every single one of them.
In the context below, dirty as in unclean, potentially infected etc. Plus, the fact that many of them have ya-ba habits.
(Plus, dirty as in promiscuous, like most of us).
Hi CB,
Thanks for a useful answer. However in a night scene like Bangkok, or as a matter of fact, anywhere in the world, does a 'clean' place exist? We just need to play safe a protect ourselves, right?
BTW what is ya ba habit? Excuse my ignorance.
There are plenty of clean girls here too. In fact, they outnumber the dirty ones tenfold.
It's just that the dirty ones are much more easily accessible. Especially for the instant action that most of us crave.
But yes, you're correct - we just need to protect ourselves.
Ya Ba is a methamphetamine that is usually smoked, and that many many bar-girls (and countless others) regularly use. It comes in little orange pills and these days is mostly manufactured in Burma. Has that sickly-sweet smell when burnt.
In Thai YA means drug/medicine, and BA means crazy.
Can you give me some suggestion on 'clean' place CB as I am heading back in a few weeks time.
A lot of people said these expensive massage parlour are clean as they have regular checkup for the girls..etc. In fact many go-go bars claims their girls are regularly checked too. I go to MP for the good services, not for its 'cleaniness'.
To me, I just think people have the illusion that things are better if you have to pay more for it, especially the locals who think STD/AIDS only comes from Westerners. What do you think.
Hey CB, do you live in Bangkok?
Depends if you mean cleaner-P4P or just clean. Somewhere like Route 66 on RCA is good for clean girls.
The girls working at upmarket karaokes and hostess bars are normally required to be tested regularly.
Anyway, I prefer dirty, and I know a lot more about dirty than clean.
I date a lot of students and other non-working girls and in general they are cleaner than bar-girls but you never know.
Okay, no more of this C word.
[QUOTE=W169]Hey CB, do you live in Bangkok?[/QUOTE]
I live in Chiang Mai but am in BKK at least ten days per month.
Have just remembered why we are talking about clean girls- it came from your cabby's comments.
I don't think anyone would dispute the fact that prostitutes are "dirtier" (in every sense of the word), and have higher STD prevalence than non-working girls.
There is always this Bangkok cabby opinion but I regularly hear the exact same sentiments from kohn Thai of all walks of life. (Just as I hear the exact same thing said about EDSA girls from cabbies in Manilla).
Not everyone in BKK shares our love of NEP girls!
Anyway, clean is good, but dirty is often necessary.
i have just come back from 5 nights in bangkok and 5 nights in pattaya.
i think on the whole the thai girls are much cleaner and respectfull of catching std's than girls in england.
i found it very difficult to find young freelancers from the angels disco or outside in the car park to do owo, and cim from these girls was impossible.
most of these girls asked me if i had hiv because i was asking for oral without a condom, in england i always have oral without.
the massage parlours like annies and teen massage would do owo cim, but even then this involved several washes of my cock with a antiseptic wash and then they would rinse out their mouths with mouthwash before and afterwards, this is un heard of in english massage parlours.
in pattaya it was the same story as bangkok, i had a owo cim at [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord900][CodeWord900][/url] in pattaya this again involved intense cleaning of my cock with antiseptic wipes, and then several gargling sessions by the girl, who then insisted on making me inspect her mouth to see she had no bleeding gums,or ulcers before she commenced.
in pattaya i took out the same bargirl two nights in a row, on the second night she said i could have sex without, and come inside her but obviously i declined i am not that kinky.
[QUOTE=Coma Boy]Depends if you mean cleaner-P4P or just clean. Somewhere like Route 66 on RCA is good for clean girls.
[/QUOTE]
Coma Boy,
when I was at RCA last time, February on a friday at 11:30pm, it was almost dead. All other bars - except Route 66 - were closed and even Route 66 was quite empty. I found a student for company and she told me that RCA is dying because most of the biz went to the Ratchada Soi 4 area, where we went later on. It was packed as usual.
Is RCA back to life or still a waste of time ?
RCA is making a comeback.
Route 66 merged with Interstate and has been converted into a very cool and extremely popular venue. I went a few weeks ago and had to stand in line to enter! Route 66 is definitely a good pick-up joint but certainly no P4P unless you meet a student who can't live without the latest Nokia. Any mongers wanting to pick up here should go with Thai friends, it isn't the sort of place to lurk alone.
RCA is certainly quieter than the old days and I didn't even see one Thai-teen gang-fight!
All in all though, I still prefer Ratchada.
OK - where is RCA (or what does it mean) and no comic RTFF response (I usually don't venture much in BKK)
Dinghy:
Read the... oh, sorry.
RCA = Royal City Avenue.
thanks I think... It's not a location talked about that I remember reading much before -Now that I know, i'll either look on a map or ASK (assuming I just decide to venture out there next trip)
Dinghy:
RCA is pretty much 99% Thai. Mostly students, but slowly attracting the Thai hi-so crowd.
Certainly not a good place for mongers, but if you've got special skills it's easy enough to pick-up there. Otherwise you'll leave feeling fucking frustrated at the hotties you couldn't chat to, and take it out on some poor Sukhumvit harlot.
Nearest BTS is probably Asok or Phrom Phong but best to take a taxi. In fact, you'd have to take a taxi from the BTS anyway. Typical Thai student scene- entrance fees, 1am closing, occassional police [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] testing, motorbike crashes etcetera.
Coma - pood pa-sa Thai kongchun is about sam-kreung bee dek khon thai (to those who want to know - I speak like a 3-1/2 year old) getting dee gwar, though
You want to say:
Pom pood parsah Thai dai geng tao gab dek Thai ar yuu sahm kuab.
(Note: for ages under about ten you say "Kuab" instead of "Bee").
Keep it up Dinghy, you'll improve in no time.
I don't think anyone would dispute the fact that prostitutes are "dirtier" (in every sense of the word), and have higher STD prevalence than non-working girls. [/QUOTE]
That's for sure, however, I'm tending to think that pros - well, those catering to farangs at least - are more knowledgeable about STDs and such. The only times I've been concerned about cleanliness has been with part-timers, the one's who only work occasionally. One pulled the 'very shy' routine and didn't want me to bathe with her then when I went in for some DATY it turns out she had an obvious and roaring yeast infection. She didn't even know that anything was wrong! Yea, a lot of STDs don't have any obvious symptoms, but I tend to think that the real pros have a higher awareness and (very hopefully) are cleaner than the non-working girls
Hey guys,
I read a report this evening in the washington post regarding the Aids rate in Japan that seemed alarming. In it they discuss how the Japanese have always denied the fact that Aids exists in significant numbers in their society etc etc and that lately, due to a number of factors, is has increased very rapidly.
One of the comparisons that they made was in relation to Thailand where they state that, according to the UNAIDS org, 1 in 100 people in Thailand are HIV positive. That seems like a ridiculously high figure! Are these just scare tactics or is there any truth to this?
[url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35538-2004Jul7.html[/url]
Dear Mr Pole
I was intrerested in your post. As it gave no references, I looked up the WP and found a year ago the USA was asking, as ever, for Japan to give more money to America's pet projects. Japan has one of the world's lowest HIV rates. One major reason is that there is little IV drug use in Japan. So, follow the money trail with the Washington Post and discount their bs accordingly. Japan has a low HIV rate but its sex industry is largely closed to transient mongers which is just as well for the rest of us;)
As HIV rates are much higher than 1 in 100 in many places, parts of Thailand included, the rate is not ridiculously high as you claim. The bareback, DATY and others here are playing Russian roulette. They can pretend to shuffle and stack the deck all they like but there is a lot of disease out there to help us remember our LOS fling.
Thulolado: Apologists here for these fallen women might argue that they are often cleaner. However, in places like LOS where the customer is always right and where the skanks are illiterate field hands, and where the doctors can only tell them to breathe out on the way up (rinse it after every fuck), caution is probably advised.
Personally, I am saddened that men go to Thailand to abuse these diseased women.
Coma Boy,
thanks for the RCA update. I will give it another chance next time. It used to be a good pick-up joint in the past and I hope it will be as good as it has been.
It seems to have become slightly more pricey and slightly more hi-so, and so isn't as good a pick-up joint as it used to be when it was just Thai teens out of their minds on 100 Pipers.
Domino,
Here is the article if you'd like to read it:
[url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/04/AR2005060400938_pf.html[/url]
I'm heading back to Thailand in a couple weeks to study at Chula and am looking forward to it regardless. I always cover up so I'm not too worried but one in 100 still seems a bit high. I could understand a figure like that in Africa but recent reports I've read seem to indicate that Thailand has shown a steady decline in new Aids cases in the past few years.
Anyway, better safe than sorry I guess.
MP
[QUOTE=Marco Pole]One in 100 still seems a bit high.[/QUOTE]One in 100 seems a bit low!
Yeah good point...guess I should rephrase that.
Well I just spent to many drunken nights with girls and became reckless in not using condoms all the time. I think I now have made the biggest mistake in my life. I do not have any stds, but I now have a gland infection in my pelvis area near the groin. I am afraid that this is the first sign of hiv infection. Does any body know if I can buy an orasure or any other kind of at home hiv/aids test kit in bkk or pattaya?
Also does anybody know what is Thai policy regarding testing at a clinic? If I am hiv positive, will I be registered as a carrier? Will it be listed on my entry through passport control? Thanks for any information, from scared and stupid.
That is not an early sign of HIV infection, it could be anything.
Just go to a good hospital, have them test you (use a fake name if you must), and then worry about the results afterwards.
If you've gone bareback more than a few times you have probably also caught (and spread) Chlamydia, which is often asymptomatic. But this is easily treated with a short course of antibiotics.
Report your symptoms to a doctor, and let the professionals work out what has caused the infection instead of jumping to conclusions. Be 100% honest with the doctors, they may frown disapprovingly but there is no point keeping secrets from them.
If you simply take a blood-test for HIV you'll still have the infection (and whatever else you may have picked up), whatever the HIV results.
Good luck.
In Victorian Britain, the high society believed that if you were infected with some STD's, the only effective cure was to have unprotected sex with a virgin, so that she would get the disease and the infected man would be clean again.
The effectiveness of this procedure was disappointing, though.
Seriously, as Coma Boy wisely advised, go to a real doctor, get yourself examined and get treated on the spot.
I would not worry too much about HIV if I were you. There are lots of nasty things that can be sexually acquired, especially when engaging into unprotected intercourse with promiscuous sex providers, but hardly anything that modern drugs cannot treat. It can be very unpleasant and even downright painful, but you will survive.
Act now.
[QUOTE=Bonsuk]Well I just spent to many drunken nights with girls and became reckless in not using condoms all the time.
First off good luck with the AIDS test. When you say you were reckless in not using condoms, did you pressure the Thai girls to not use them or did you just forget? I thought all TG's were pretty insistant on using condoms.
I hope things work out for you.
Regards Horatio
[QUOTE=Horatio]I thought all TG's were pretty insistent on using condoms.[/QUOTE]Not as insistent as they should be. I'd say about 4/10 are ready to go without protection. I am often the one insisting.
Let me cut and paste a previous post of mine on this:
It is very easy to have condomless sex in Thailand, for many reasons:
1. many girls do not care much, it is in their mentality to be fatalistic and fun-loving.
2. if you go to MPs that cater to the Asian market, condom use is not so frequent, as many Asian men do not want to use it. (They seem to believe AIDS is a Farang thing, that is why many such places are Asian only).
3. Girls can be carried away by the moment and lose sight of whether you use a condom or not.
4. if you are with a girl for some time, she will easily consider that she is your GF, and in their mind GF sex is condomless. "Some time" might mean several days, or just the second shot of the first encounter.
For all those reasons, you should never count on the girl to be the one enforcing safe sex. You are in charge, and you need to be strong enough to use condoms in all circumstances, because the choice is often entirely yours. Or else, you are into risk management area ...
Bonsuk, if you've "just spent" all those wild nights then the odds that what you're seeing is HIV are basically nil. It could be any number of things, and if what you're seeing is an infected prostrate those could include gonorrhoea, chlamydia, candida or a huge number of other things, either STD related or not. None of those is going to get you put on any list in LOS, and most types are treated with antibiotics or steriods and alpha-blockers.
But don't spend time worrying -- get checked out and get it dealt with. And then let folks here know what's what, so we can all learn from your experience.
Bonsuk,
Early signs of HIV (Primary infection) are flu like symtoms like sudden high fever, muscle ache and in some cases a skin rash. That occurs within a few days after the infection, in about 60 - 80 % of the cases, but disappears again after 5 - 10 days. And - sorry to say that - swollen glands CAN occur during the primary infection, too. But this symptom can occur with MANY different kinds of infections, which are easy to treat. And - many people do not experience any syptoms of a Primary Infection, so you can only be sure about it if you make a test.
On the other hand - the chance that you got infected with HIV is close to zero, if we talk about "a few nights", and if you have no open wounds / small fissures at your penis, which increases the risk dramatically.
There are Antigen tests available, which can check on the virus approx. 10 days to 2 weeks after the initial event. This tests are expensive, but I recommend to spend that money because the antibody tests will only give you results 6 weeks to 3 months after the infection. That time period will drive you crazy, you will experience mental stress in a way you never experienced before.
Pattaya International Hospital - go there and make a test, immediately.
Use condoms from now on, to protect the girls - and to protect US.
Whatever the outcome is - the HIV infection is nowadays NOT a death sentance any more. You will have to take a cocktail of medicaments all your life, change your life style (alcohol, smoking) and you will only have protected sex, if you care about others. But the average life expectation for newly HIV-infected people is rising every year, and many infected people will live their normal life and die of a heart attack one day, as other non-infected people too.
Good luck to you.
Giotto
Study Says Circumcision Reduces AIDS Risk by 70%
Here are the first two paragraphs from an article posted by the July 5 Wall Street Journal Online.
In a potentially major breakthrough in the campaign against AIDS, French and South African researchers have apparently found that male circumcision reduces by about 70% the risk that men will contract HIV through intercourse with infected women.
Other than abstinence and safer sex, almost nothing has been proved to reduce the sexual spread of HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. World-wide, the major route of HIV transmission for many years has been heterosexual sex.
sorry to disappoint but this kind of bullshit has been floating around for years. for over 100 years, all kinds of quacks have been promoting circumcision to cure everything from speech impediments to the clap and now hiv.
the key thing about cut v uncut is it allows these idiots measure, compare and contrast, and then to write idiotic papers, go to conferences, get money for more "research" and go to conferences to bareback skanks. papers have been appearing on hiv and circumcision for over 10 years just as they previously appeared on other hot topics of days gone by.
the japanese are generally uncut as are the south koreans. they have very low hiv rates. importantly, americans' cut rate is around 50% so it is easy to get groups of cut and uncut and look for significant differences in infection rates between them. (cut junkies v uncut).
in africa, muslims tend to be uncut but cleaner in hygiene and more prone to keep their dicks in their pants. also, it can be difficult to tell who is cut, uncut or half cut (in africa).
bottom line: it was probably a quiet day at the wsg. nonsense like that should be beneath them. i make this post as it might save someone reading it from believing having a cut dick will save them if they fuck a hiv ridden skank/whatever.
cold advice like this is needed when we see some of the bullshit recently written both here and in the wsg.
love, peace and death.
that should read wsj;)
Agreed. This report (on WSJ) is crap, and dangerous. You can have microscopic lesions on your foreskin the same way you can have lesions on the head or base of your penis. Circumsision won't protect you at all. Let's not all go cutting off our tips and think we are protected. We are not. We are messing around in a dangerous hobby, and this report is going to convince some idiot who is circumsised that he is safe and he will go out and have unprotected sex with some beach road skank and get sick. Then he will say "But I am circumsised! I thought I was protected!" Use your brains, everyone. Wrap it up before you stick it in.
That circumcision report is dangerous nonsense. I don't really want to comment on that study; anybody who knows a little bit about that virus and the way it enters into the body will not even start a serious discussion about that study.
Even from the simple mathematical point of view it should not have any impact on our sexual behavior and the necessity for safe sex. The mentioned risk reduction still leaves us with that remaining 30 % ... so what does it help?
Breakthrough? A breakthrough would be the development of a vaccine, or a medicament which can destroy the virus in infected bodies. These are the fields serious scientists are doing research in.
Giotto
Gentlemen
My stance on practicing safe sex is well documented on the WSG Board. I am not advocating unprotected sexual intercourse.
The Wall Street Journal is not the National Enquirer or similar to any other tabloid publication, but one of the most highly respected newspapers in the world. They don't print trash or crap. Before you lambaste the article I informed you of, I suggest you read it in its entirety.
Personally, after reading about the study, I feel safer indulging in our dangerous pastime because I practice safe sex and am also circumcised.
Read my post in the photo section in the Philippines about WHO/CDC, the Times is no better, they've had their source problems, articles can be total bullcrap.
[QUOTE=Ralph Kramden]Gentlemen
My stance on practicing safe sex is well documented on the WSG Board. I am not advocating unprotected sexual intercourse.
The Wall Street Journal is not the National Enquirer or similar to any other tabloid publication, but one of the most highly respected newspapers in the world. They don't print trash or crap. Before you lambaste the article I informed you of, I suggest you read it in its entirety.
Personally, after reading about the study, I feel safer indulging in our dangerous pastime because I practice safe sex and am also circumcised.[/QUOTE]
reduces the chances of contracting HIV.
The study is considered significant because scientists have yet to discover an effective vaccine against the HIV virus or develop a reliable way to prevent infection other than through abstinence or safe-sex practices.
[b][u]Previous studies have linked circumcision with increased HIV infection.[/u][/b]
While these medical results--if they're published [b]and validated[/b]--may help some parents decide whether to have their baby boys circumcised, conservatives face a dilemma about what to do: [i][b]on the one hand, the story's in the Wall Street Journal; but on the other, the study was conducted by the French.[/i][/b]
Can you imagine what Americans would do if a group of foreigners blew into town and tried to round up 3,000 men to be randomly circumcised? But then, South Africa IS a country where people actually believe you can prevent HIV by having sex with an infant, so go figure."
Thought you guys might like to an overall Asian snap shot. Looks like, as Chairman Mao said, the East is red. Pity red means Aids.
We are not attacking you. Not at all. We just think that the WSJ report is dangerous because it will lead some people to believe that they can have unprotected sex as long as they are circumsised. I did read the report, I do understand what they wrote, but I also know what some who read the report will interpret it to mean. It is dangerous.
[QUOTE=Domino]Thought you guys might like to an overall Asian snap shot. Looks like, as Chairman Mao said, the East is red. Pity red means Aids.[/QUOTE]
Domino
The map looks outdated as India is also a place where the AIDS virus is spreading rapidly. Just my 2 cents.
Duni: The map is tryng to highlight two things:
1. where HIV ACCELERATION rates are expected to reach Olympian levels soon. Papua New Guinea is expected to get gold and Chinan silver.
2. places with low HIV rates: Japan and South Korea win here with Pakistan and the Philippines dubiously following.
Although India and Thailand have impressively robust rates, the acceleration of those rates does not seem to be so much of an issue. The map writes a message that India has gold for HIV quantity in Asia.
Although PNG is an institutional mess, and the growth rates there should be bullish, there is no room for complacency anywhere.
Recent posts claiming circumcision is a protective against HIV, or that taking "only" a few chances is ok (ie not fucking the skank for a very long period of time) are either misinformed, naive or very dangerous.
I write the last peice as someone who was led to believe the fact that I have little bit off the top would protect me from the clap in Thailand. It didn't. And in case one of our English low life trolls is reading this, I posted about my clap when I got it. There is no such thing as safe sex with Thai skanks.
Domino
OK, I see your point. Agree with you and others regarding BS article on circumcision. It is irresponsible and does more harm than good.
D-
Well I just recevied my results from my HIV test and thankfully it came out negative. A fellow monger mentioned a new and very clean clinic on Suk and Soi 11. You can't see the clinic from the street, its inside an alley way behind the 7-11 on Soi 11, it's also along the same alley way as Cheap Charlies bar. The test cost 500 bht and results are given the next day. They don't ask for id, so you can write down any name you want on the test form.
The reason I had an HIV test was that I had gotten mono from a girl in Vietnam 2 months ago, and last week I developed a gland infection while working in Bkk! I felt that my immune system must be very weak to be getting sick so often. Let me point out, I am very healthy, trim and workout at the gym. When I went to the doctor to get checked out, I was told I had a gland infection which was caused by having sex with prostitutes. This caused pure panic in me, thinking that I might have Aids.
I have been mongering for several years now, and when I first started I was very strict about using condoms, but as I became more comfortable with visiting prostitutes I became complacent for many reasons.
1. I would have a girlfriend and frequent prostitutes at the same time. Nothing beats the feeling of going bareback, and it's firmly implanted in your mind when you have a girlfriend. So when you visit a really hot looking working girl you think of how good its going to feel w/o a condom. This is especially true when I was drunk, when I am drunk I lose all sensiblity and discipline.
2. When I was travelling or on a business trip I would get very lonely and sometimes it can be very easy to develop a "relationship" with the girl, over time this would lead to sex w/o a condom.
3. Hanging out and talking to other mongers, I would find out that many never use condoms! They don't like to use them and don't think that they can get Aids. Many of these guys have been in Asia for years, so it gave me a false sense of security that hiv is not possible to catch.
4. I've travelled to some remote areas where the brothel workers do not have condoms or even know what they are. These is especially true in remote areas of China and Indonesia, so always carry condoms.
All this said and done, before my test I had some difficult thinking of how I was going to cope with being HIV positive. I am 32 years old and realized how I would have wasted my life if I was positive. All of the time spent going to school and geting my BA, MBA and building my career would be flushed down the drain. The disappointment in my parents in finding out I am carrying HIV, would be devastating. And most importantly, I would never have the experience of getting married and raising a family.
This was a very scary experience that really scared me straight, we all know that we should use condoms when mongering, and there is good reason to. I never really considered what responsibilty we have when having sex with prostitutes as I was always looking for a good time. Just think what your life would be life would be like if you are HIV positive and what effects it would have on you and your responsiblities to your family. I know I never considered these issues before and hope that everyone can learn from my experience in order to avoid putting your health and life on the line by not using condoms.
Bonsuk
Hi friends,
Just came back from the TOP CLINIC, 2nd. Rd., in Pattaya where I had a chat with the doctor. I asked him what the majority of the cases are, which he sees. He tells me that almost all customers, Farang and Thai alike, fall into two categories:
1. Respiratory illnesses (what brought me to the clinic; I picked up a bad case of bronchitis probably on a bus)
2. Ghonorea
He urges NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, to exercise the hobby without a condom!
In his opinion, there is a 99.99% chance NOT TO AQUIRE HIV, but currently a almost certain chance to catch Ghonorea (nasty, long lasting, fun spoiling) in Pattaya.
All this talk about AIDS raised a curious question within me.
If you guys don’t mind me asking, how many of you guys get BBBJ with these girls?
I haven’t when I went, either that or I was too drunk to notice LOL.
There is nothing like the Bare back feeling but I usually do it with the girls I know from back home.
BBBJ is pretty standard over here. I've never come across a CBJ, am still not sure if they actually exist.
I'd imagine a girl only requests cover if the wiener looks unclean or something.
As for the risk, I don't believe it to be too high, and it's a risk I happily take.
I'd imagine eating **** and ass is slightly riskier. One girl I know told me she has had a customer who put a condom on his tongue for the task. Odd.
DISEASE CONTROL: Ministry to target TB during HIV treatment
Published on August 02, 2005
Two-in-one programme will tackle diseases as part of Bt30 health scheme
The Public Health Ministry will conduct a free tuberculosis treatment programme for people living with HIV/Aids in order to reduce the growing number of people living with both diseases.
Deputy Public Health Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said the two-in-one treatment programme was aimed at curing tuberculosis along with the life-saving anti-retroviral treatment under the government’s Bt30 healthcare scheme.
About a third of people living with HIV/Aids were found to also have tuberculosis, which accounts for 12 times the infection rate among non-HIV/Aids sufferers, he said.
The ministry was forced to shift its approach for the treatment of both tuberculosis and HIV/Aids by integrating the treatment programme for HIV/Aids patients.
“The more tuberculosis patients who are cured, the less chance there is that the disease will spread to the rest of the population,” Anutin said.
Working-class people with low incomes make up the majority of people who contract tuberculosis, which kills about 6,000 every year in Thailand, Anutin said. About 10,000 new infections are recorded every year.
Despite the high number of tuberculosis cases, only 55,000 people enrolled in the treatment programme, which takes about six to eight months.
Dr Somchai Phinyoporn-
panitch, deputy director-general of the Disease Control Department, said 76 per cent of the treated cases were successful. The success rate is much lower than the World Health Organisa-tion standard of 85 per cent, he said.
The drug resistance rate of people living with HIV/Aids and tuberculosis is considered high at 5 to 7 per cent, compared to about 1 per cent in the general public.
This prompted the ministry to monitor drug resistance and report on a four-month basis in every province.
As part of the two-in-one treatment programme, tuberculosis patients who have tested positive for HIV/Aids will be evaluated for HIV/Aids treatments such as anti-retroviral drugs. People living with HIV/Aids who have tested positive for tuberculosis will be enrolled in the treatment programme.
The Nation
I was never impressed with the choice of condoms available in Thailand which ranged from cheap Thai made stuff to basic Durex or other brands. Ultra-thin condoms with increased sensitivity which I'd rather have seem to be unavailable.
I'll probably bring my own supply next time. Unless anyone knows where to get some of those ultra-thin 'skinless' Japanese brands from any specialty shops in BKK.
Top 10 condoms reviewed:
[url]http://www.condomdepot.com/reviews/best-condoms.htm[/url]
Wow- those Crown Skinless and Kimono look amazing. If anyone finds them here please post location.
I generally use Durex Featherlite, Jeans, or Comfort, but always steal imported condoms when friends from overseas visit.
I accidentally used one of those numbing condoms (Performax) a couple of weeks back, it was horrible, I couldn't finish after about three hours. Good cardio though.
What really are our chances of getting HIV? Has anyone ever stopped and calculated their risks. I think that Western countries got so paranoid about aids that you can be with a girl for months and she'll still insist on a condom. Consider this:
.5% chance that the woman has HIV
10% chance that you contract it when having unprotected sex with someone infected with HIV (this is especially low if you don't cum inside from what I understand)
Therefore, that is a 1/2000 chance of getting HIV when having sex. If you are having unprotected sex with only 3 or 4 different girls at a time on a continual basis (who you change every few months or so), that you met at clubs, and having protected sex with prostitutes, it is unlikely you will ever get HIV, and if you do you'll be so old that something else is going to kill you first anyways.
I'm not saying that unprotected sex is generally a smart thing, sometimes its alright and sometimes it isn't. What I am challenging is the conventional wisdom that condoms should always be used with someone whom you don't know, and that calculated risks can't be made in regards to sex. When I get to the point where I'm not even thinking about a condom, it is in such an impassioned moment with a woman as to be in a low risk situation anyways. I.e. you wouldn't be in that state of mind in a dirty brothel or with some professional cold hooker from a bar. I can take 1/1000 long shot to have great sex with several beautiful girls, whom I feel good about, instead of a lifetime of boring, protected sex. Just driving an automobile is a calcuated risk that people unquestionably take, yet unprotected sex, with about the same risk of injury or fatality, is unquestionably rejected.
Consider that people in many developing countries like Thailand and Argentina, whom 10% or less use condoms on a regular basis as reported by polls. These guys are out doing it all of the time without a rubber and very few are contracting anything, why should we miss out on the fun? Of course someone would be at a huge risk if they went around to brothels everyday having unprotected sex, but that is completely different than doing it with just a few, non-working girls every month.
One more thing to consider, how much of HIV contracted through heterosexual sex comes from unprotected anal sex? Probably a very large amount. If you are someone who doesn't like anal sex and never engages in it, your chances probably go down much more.
I bet that quite a few people who preach condom usage are hyprocrites who regularly don't use condoms, who simply want you to use them to reduce their risk of catching anything.
[QUOTE=Havrum]0.5% chance that the woman has HIV[/QUOTE]Yeah, good luck with those odds in Thailand!
You should also consider what you may be giving to the girls, not just what they may give you.
Keep it wrapped fool!
I bet you are right. I bet most people wouldn't catch anything that can't be cured (well, maybe herpies). But condoms are a very cheap and easy form of insurance that lets me sleep at night. Have you tried the new ultra-thin condoms? May I suggest you try a variety pack to find a brand that fits best? I swear condoms are ten times better then they were when I was a teenager. For me the upside of unprotected sex doesn't equal the possible (however unlikely) downside of unprotected sex. Happy hunting F4T
PS I accept the risk when I drive. But I still wear a seatbelt.
Havrum,
it's like playing lottery, the chances to win aren't very high but there is always someone who will win the jackpot.
You play but do you really want to win THAT jackpot ?
Havrum,
Do you have any source for those statistics? Or did you just make them up?
Havrum.. it isn't only HIV.
It's a host of many STDs.
Guys that BB girls foolishly think they are the first ones to do that with the provider.
What's worse, the girls believe that their customer is someone that never buys sex from a provider.
Boy, is everyone wrong in this game....
[QUOTE=Havrum]What really are our chances of getting HIV? Has anyone ever stopped and calculated their risks. I think that Western countries got so paranoid about aids that you can be with a girl for months and she'll still insist on a condom. [/QUOTE]
Hey,
Well, let me chime in on this thread, first, to let you know, I spent 21 years in Navy medicine, most of it in Asia (Philippines, Hong Kong, Japan, Thailand). Most of what is below is from my personal and professional experiences, not I “read somewhere…” bullcrap.
-The CDC/WHO are very political bodies, case in point, in 1986 while stationed at Subic, CDC dropped in and decided to test all of the working girls for HIV. They had a brief conference at the Naval Hospital Subic, at which they stated before testing that they would (from preliminary data) find that 60-70% of the working girls would be HIV positive. So they went forth and tested, finding 18 HIV positive girls in just under 10,000 registered hostesses in Olongapo City (via bi-weekly testing of all bar girls at the Olongapo City social hygiene clinic) Eighteen girls, that’s less than 1 %, all but one where over 30. But having this data in hand, CDC then went about pronounning that the HIV level was about 60%.
-A condom will not protect you from all STDs, if they are only 70% effective in preventing pregnancy then it figures that they are 70% effective against STDs.
-A condom will not protect you against herpes. The most common infection sites are the labial lips (minora and majora), as well as the public mound, none of which are covered by a condom.
-Chlamydia is the most common form of STD in Asia, it is a plant-animal, it’s hard to kill, and it’s getting worse. You would rather have Gonorrhea vice Chlamydia. It is often misdiagnosed as gonorrhea, and normal treatment protocols are ineffective against Chlamydia. Many clinics, both in the US and in Asia do not have the testing kit for it, which is interesting since it is easier and faster to test for it vice gonorrhea.
Bottom line, I could care less if you go bare back or not, it’s a risk you take. I might also add that a good number of working Thai girls (as well a working Filipino girls) have a boyfriend and/or husband who tends to be a reservoir for anything she might pick up either from her BF/Husband or you.
[QUOTE=Havrum]I think that Western countries got so paranoid about aids that you can be with a girl for months and she'll still insist on a condom. .[/QUOTE]
Havrum,
The comments from the previous 5 posters says it all. Yes everything in flife is a calculated risk, however its not a risk worth taking in a an environment which you know to be loaded against the math.
Intelligent behaviour is the only answer. So those chicas who insist on a condom even after you have been with them for months are being intelligent.
Regards, Havanaman
Coma Boy: Yes, Skinless condoms, like Skinless, are tops. Okamoto make them: like most tihngs Japanese, they are the best. I find them a little small but that is probably not a problem for you;)
Beating the odds: This is the wrong application of probability and lurs us into a false sense of protection. Most Pattaya skanks are STI infected. Ans syphilis is at pandemic propirtions in SE Asia like it is in Africa.
Uncle Domino
(looking after your welfare)
Domino,
Please excuse my ignorance: please explain “skinless condoms”…
Regards, Havanaman
Long long ago, when Havanaman was Havanaboy, there was a naughty website run by whatshisname before Jackson became The Skipper. A handsome stud, called John Hansum Man Skinless, decided to join the august and select band of warriors, who included such luminaries as Zxelda and Freeler, who were spreading their light over the Net. (Gladiator and Seydlitz were also there fearlessly spreading the word and their sperm) But John Skiness had to use a name according to the rules of the forum and so he chose his surname, which he got from the Okamoto company which is the world's biggest manufacturers of condoms. When John looked down to choose a name, he lighted on the packet of Skinless condoms he always keeps handy. Eureka.
Now why did Okamoto pick the name Skinless? For the following reasons: 1. Skinless condoms are like having no skin, no condom, skinless, a Japanese expression; it is like doing it skinless; 2. Japanese companies like to use English/Japlish as it sounds more upmarket: please remember that Japan is the only major non US/European country with lots of brand names (Korea, HK have some and Cuba has one). 3. the Japanese are shit at English so their English often gets mangled. Thus confusion with the meaning of Skinless.
Now I hope this information was useful to you as I have billed you $20US for my SIN Fund (skanks in Need): If you check my recent photos, you will agree that there are a lot of ugly skanks whose only hope of geting $20 is by scamming someone like you:)
Havanaman: Recently in Pattaya, I buttholed a skank with a Skinless condom. When I removed it, it was covered in shit. My delicate constitution finds it hard to deal with that and I almost got sick. I am scared of it happening again. Any advice?
shit, I am hot today. I already did post 888 in the Photo section and this is my 777 post. I wonder how 666 is getting along. Anyone want me to mention them in this post? It costs only $20 to SIN.
[QUOTE=Domino]I find them a little small but that is probably not a problem for you.[/QUOTE]LOL, thanks Domino! Well, if they're too small for you, they'll definitely be too small for me! I am British after all.
If you don't want a shitty-dick after anal try asking the young lady to take a shit beforehand. Anyway, a few brown stains on the sheets adds to the magic of anal, and gives the occassion a certain element of theatre.
The worse thing is that I am quite partial to rimming, and I tell you, getting a taste in the mouth isn't pleasant.
Coma,
Please forgive me for not posting a picture that matches your latest post...:(.
Domino,
Over in the photo section:
Where did you get that duck photo? And, more important, who is that smiling bigtit in the picture with the duck? I see many familiar faces in your photos, but I don't remember her...
[QUOTE=Freeler]Coma,
Please forgive me for not posting a picture that matches your latest post...:(.
...[/QUOTE]
Freeler, you mean you actually have one ?
:eek:
1ball,
Check your pm... You kind of asked for it!
Nice one Domino, especially the tender tone to it. As far as the SIN fund goes how do we know that you will actually not skank it?
Suspecious.
Go on Freeler, post the pic.
or is it too much, even for our esteemed friends on the Thai board?
Fucking blew me away. Yikes !!!
[QUOTE=Frankfurter]Hi friends,
Just came back from the TOP CLINIC, 2nd. Rd., in Pattaya where I had a chat with the doctor. I asked him what the majority of the cases are, which he sees. He tells me that almost all customers, Farang and Thai alike, fall into two categories:
1. Respiratory illnesses (what brought me to the clinic; I picked up a bad case of bronchitis probably on a bus)
2. Ghonorea
He urges NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, to exercise the hobby without a condom!
In his opinion, there is a 99.99% chance NOT TO AQUIRE HIV, but currently a almost certain chance to catch Ghonorea (nasty, long lasting, fun spoiling) in Pattaya.[/QUOTE]That Doctor is right. I caught Gonorrhea in Bangkok. I don't know which girl gave it to me. I don't use condoms. I have been tested anonymously at a Clinc.
Gonorrhea long lasting? In the couple times I've gotten it years ago, it was the simplest STD to clear up. 2 anti-biotic tabs a day and its gone in 2 days.
Syphilis was a bad experience though. After being diagnosed with it, the clinic that treated me told me to wait. I waited for 2 hours until closing time in the evening. I found out why they told me to wait. After all the patients were gone and I was the only one left, the doctor gave me the nastiest, longest lasting shot in the buttocks I'd ever experienced. I was screaming at the top of my lungs. But conveniently for him, no patients around to get frightened and leave. ;)
[QUOTE=Freeler]Coma,
Please forgive me for not posting a picture that matches your latest post.[/QUOTE]Post it!
Excrement is a romantic and beautiful thing.
LOL. Thanks Domino, I think I understand now.
BTW Havanaman, not being as old as you are, can still remember being Havanaboy! Indeed Havanaman feels as old as the (over 20 year old..) chica he is about to plough...
[QUOTE=Domino]Havanaman: Recently in Pattaya, I buttholed a skank with a Skinless condom. When I removed it, it was covered in shit. My delicate constitution finds it hard to deal with that and I almost got sick. I am scared of it happening again. Any advice?.[/QUOTE]
Yes…
Either be a good boy and stop it, or get your “skank” to dump a load before the fact… This is easily facilitated by getting your ride to take Bisacodyl (5mg should do the trick, assuming the painters are not in…) or one of the Fybogel drinks… If she takes the treatment when you first meet, she will be ready to “do backside” when you are ready for round two….
Regards, Havanaman
[QUOTE=Domino] Recently in Pattaya, I buttholed a skank with a Skinless condom. When I removed it, it was covered in shit. My delicate constitution finds it hard to deal with that and I almost got sick. I am scared of it happening again. Any advice? [/QUOTE]
That’s one of the reasons why I’m not into anal, I prefer to stick to pussies and mouths.
Equally, after a few accidental bites on my balls during the course of several different ball-sucking sessions, I finally decided to ban ball-sucking altogether and declared my balls a no-go area.
[QUOTE=Domino]
Recently in Pattaya, I buttholed a skank with a Skinless condom. When I removed it, it was covered in shit. My delicate constitution finds it hard to deal with that and I almost got sick. I am scared of it happening again. Any advice? [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Gladiator]That’s one of the reasons why I’m not into anal, I prefer to stick to pussies and mouths.
Equally, after a few accidental bites on my balls during the course of several different ball-sucking sessions, I finally decided to ban ball-sucking altogether and declared my balls a no-go area.[/QUOTE]
Thats rare experience in my experience. Over 40 "skanks I've buttholed" over the years its only happened with 2.
[QUOTE=JP2U]Gonorrhea long lasting? In the couple times I've gotten it years ago, it was the simplest STD to clear up. 2 anti-biotic tabs a day and its gone in 2 days.
Syphilis was a bad experience though. After being diagnosed with it, the clinic that treated me told me to wait. I waited for 2 hours until closing time in the evening. I found out why they told me to wait. After all the patients were gone and I was the only one left, the doctor gave me the nastiest, longest lasting shot in the buttocks I'd ever experienced. I was screaming at the top of my lungs. But conveniently for him, no patients around to get frightened and leave. ;)[/QUOTE]When you had Syphilis, did you have any symptoms and what did it feel like when you had it?
[QUOTE=Johnson994]When you had Syphilis, did you have any symptoms and what did it feel like when you had it?[/QUOTE]
Boy, that was a while back. During my condom-less BKK romps of the 80's. Symptoms of syph are slow developing, over a few weeks. I felt fatigue and noticed a slight sore developing on my penis.
Dear Fellow mongers,
Can some one will be infected when doing a comdomless blow job? I mean both cum in mouth or only sucking by hookers.
Please enlightened me with your precious ideas.
[blue][Report deleted by Admin][/blue]
[size=-2][b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted in accordance with the ISG Forum's Zero Tolerance policy prohibiting reports containing any [u]references to transvestites or transsexuals[/u]. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.[/blue][/size]
one can become infected with a STD via a condomless blow job, oral-pharygeal gonorrhea is common and worst yet it is usually virulent, one can also have herpes and/or syphilis sores inside the mouth and transfer it to someone via an uncovered blow job....better now!
[QUOTE=Macho Dik]Dear Fellow mongers,
Can some one will be infected when doing a comdomless blow job? I mean both cum in mouth or only sucking by hookers.
Please enlightened me with your precious ideas.[/QUOTE]
I have just got back from Pattaya as it was a short trip, was there back in June and was surprised that nearly all the girls did not bother about protection especially the second shot.
And on one occasion this beer bar babe I picked from Soi 7 was rubbing her pussy on the tip of my penis.(approx 0.5-1 inch)
Its only now I thought about it that got me worried as I did use protection for penetration but is this action of bare rubbing dangerous?
Infact girls in Bangkok are more persistent for protection then Pattaya and girls tend to brush their teeth before the main coarse and they normaly give BBBJ first.
Ab
[QUOTE=Abx69]This beer bar babe I picked from Soi 7 was rubbing her pussy on the tip of my penis. (approx 0.5-1 inch).[/QUOTE]That's a pretty small penis dude.
I know how you feel CB.
Hi,
I am new, and I registered here to ask someone.
Before I try to describe my question, I apologize for my bad English, I am from Europe, and I can not speak or write English very good. But I think, it is enough.
In December I will go three weeks to Thailand, Phuket. The main-reason is the Tsunami-disaster almost a year ago. I am young, 20 years old, I will go alone. It is my first travel out of Europe. I do not go there only because girls or women.
But for the case, that I will meet a beauty lady, here my question:
If I there meet a women or a prostitute, do they have condoms? Or must I look by myself for condoms? If yes, should I buy some condoms in my home-country, or can I buy there condoms too (if yes, where?)? Because I think it is too dangerous, to sleep there with women, because I have read in a travel-book, that there a lot of people have AIDS.
By the way: I have not very much carnal experiences.
I will stay in a tourist-hotel the first and the last week. In the middle week, I will search a sleeping-place, when I am there. If I meet a lady, can I take her to my hotel-room, or should I not make this?
I would be very happy, if someone cound answer the questions, because it seems, that a lot people here was already in Thailand.
Best wishes,
Indrid
Hi,
I am new, and I registered here to ask something.
Before I try to describe my question, I apologize for my bad English, I am from Europe, and I can not speak or write English very good. But I think, it is enough.
In December I will go three weeks to Thailand, Phuket. The main-reason is the Tsunami-disaster almost a year ago. I am young, 20 years old, I will go alone. It is my first travel out of Europe. I do not go there only because girls or women. I want see a lot from the island.
But for the case, that I will meet a beauty lady, here my question:
If I there meet a women or a prostitute, do they have condoms? Or must I look by myself for condoms? If yes, should I buy some condoms in my home-country, or can I buy there condoms too (if yes, where?)? Because I think it is too dangerous, to sleep there with women, because I have read in a travel-book, that there a lot of people have AIDS.
By the way: I have not very much carnal experiences.
I will stay in a tourist-hotel the first and the last week. In the middle week, I will search a sleeping-place, when I am there. If I meet a lady, can I take her to my hotel-room, or should I not make this?
I would be very happy, if someone cound answer the questions, because it seems, that a lot people here was already in Thailand.
Best wishes,
Indrid
[QUOTE=Indrid Cold]Hi,
I am new, and I registered here to ask something.
Before I try to describe my question, I apologize for my bad English, I am from Europe, and I can not speak or write English very good. But I think, it is enough.
In December I will go three weeks to Thailand, Phuket. The main-reason is the Tsunami-disaster almost a year ago. I am young, 20 years old, I will go alone. It is my first travel out of Europe. I do not go there only because girls or women. I want see a lot from the island.
But for the case, that I will meet a beauty lady, here my question:
If I there meet a women or a prostitute, do they have condoms? Or must I look by myself for condoms? If yes, should I buy some condoms in my home-country, or can I buy there condoms too (if yes, where?)? Because I think it is too dangerous, to sleep there with women, because I have read in a travel-book, that there a lot of people have AIDS.
By the way: I have not very much carnal experiences.
I will stay in a tourist-hotel the first and the last week. In the middle week, I will search a sleeping-place, when I am there. If I meet a lady, can I take her to my hotel-room, or should I not make this?
I would be very happy, if someone cound answer the questions, because it seems, that a lot people here was already in Thailand.
Best wishes,
Indrid[/QUOTE]
Indrid, the best way is to do a search. In the menu bar on the top you will see a Search button. Click and go to Advanced search with your key words and select Reports. Read them for answer to your questions.
Condoms, yes you need them. Always cover up the dick. Bring your own for best results.
Girl to room. Some hotels do let you with no questions, others charge (joiner fee) and the rest don't. Seach for Girl friendly hotels.
Inexperienced? Don't worry. The ladyboys will take care of you. They look better than a lot of the girls. :eek:
Got royally freaked out last night. I was with this girl (19 year old hottie) and was having a grand time in the 'ol bedroom, with multiple positions and all that. Went to bend her over, and noticed that the condom had come a bit loose. Tightened it up and went back to work. I came, and when I pulled out I noticed that the fucking condom had broke. FUCK. I was freaking out. So I figure for about 30 seconds or so I was vulnerable. I wasn't using any KY or anything, but it was a fairly cheap condom (Lifestyles), so that could be the reason. Anyway, I told her that the condom had broken, and she kinda freaked out, but calmed down after I told her that I was safe. I asked if she had any diseases, she told me no, and then I asked her when her last test was (I have a great book that has all these questions in Thai --- called Thai for Lovers). She told me that she was tested 3 days ago, with negative results, and that she hadn't had sex since then, and that she ALWAYS uses a condom (she wouldn't even let me touch her pussy, so I believe her). She also told me that she just had her period so she probably wouldn't get pregnant. So I think I'm in the clear.
Lesson learned: Don't use cheap condoms and also use the KY if insertion becomes a bit "difficult"
I gotta say, if a single broken condom freaks you out, you're in the wrong hobby.
[QUOTE=Indrid Cold]
..... I do not go there only because girls or women. I want see a lot from the island.....
[/QUOTE]
MmmmmmmmmBULSH..mmmmmm.. :D :D :D.
Don't worry too much, if you contracted anything chances are it will just be Chlamydia, which is often asymptomatic, but shouldn't be left unchecked. It is easily treatable with a week's course of Doxycycline (or similar).
If you bareback, or break a connie, more than a few times you will almost definitely pick up a dose of this beautiful bacterium.
Regular BB folk must be permanantly hooked on antibiotics.
Read this: [url]http://www.google.co.th/search?hl=th&q=chlamydia[/url]
[QUOTE=Coma Boy]Don't worry too much, if you contracted anything chances are it will just be Chlamydia, which is often asymptomatic, but shouldn't be left unchecked. It is easily treatable with a week's course of Doxycycline (or similar).
If you bareback, or break a connie, more than a few times you will almost definitely pick up a dose of this beautiful bacterium.
Regular BB folk must be permanantly hooked on antibiotics.
Read this: [url]http://www.google.co.th/search?hl=th&q=chlamydia[/url][/QUOTE]I see. The last time I was checked I tested positive for Gonorrhea but who knows by now? I have taken so many diffrent antibiotics that nothing works any more.
[quote=johnson994]i see. the last time i was checked i tested positive for gonorrhea but who knows by now? i have taken so many diffrent antibiotics that nothing works any more.[/quote]
that's why you should have taken a double treatment for both clamydia and gonorrhea anyway. like coma said the big problem of clamydia is that sometime is asymptomatic .in case you don't have symptoms the only way to find out if you get clamydia is the urethral swab test and a blood test.despite clamydia is not a virus it produces antibodies (igg,igm).for the first time vd's catcher (not my case) calmydia will show itself with symptoms like light swab (in the morning) , hitching sensation in the urethra and burning when [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord111][CodeWord111][/url].best antibiotics for killing clamydia belong to macrolides family : erythromycin,azythromycin,iosamycin,roxithromicin.....commercial brand name : zythromax,erythrocyn,iosalide,rulid,etc....
dosage : 600 mg. on empty stomach every 6 hours for 2 weeks and you will kill clamydia straight away !! i know it very well, trust me.
[QUOTE=MarcoStraight]Dosage: 600 mg. on empty stomach every 6 hours for 2 weeks and you will kill Clamydia straight away!! I know it very well, trust me.[/QUOTE]That'd kill it for sure, but perhaps a bit excessive, you'd probably puke dropping that much into any empty tummy.
Better off with 100MG Doxy, twice a day, after meals, for 7-10 days.
But, even better off, going to the doctor instead of listening to Marco and myself, despite our brilliance.
To be honest, those guys who bareback regularly are asking for trouble. But it isn't them I pity, it's the poor girls that they go with. What they are giving to the girls is far more disturbing than what they may catch from the girls.
I'd imagine that a lot of barebackers also do so because it is already too late, and they have nothing left to lose (which kind of makes them murderers).
I know several ex-hookers who learnt the hard way- the very hard way.
[QUOTE=Coma Boy]
I know several ex-hookers who learnt the hard way- the very hard way.[/QUOTE]
That's another reason avoiding madness.I Never , ever hit something without protection since very long time.
For as much talk that gogo girls are safer than SWs or beerbar girls I am not especially inpressed with their desire to use condoms. My friend had three instances and I had one on the last trip where the gogo girls didn't plan to use condoms. We insisted on it, but there are plenty of guys who don't have that self-control and would go in anyway. The blood tests of the gogo girls would hopefully pick up an HIV case, but after weeks or months have elapsed. Who knows how many more guys she would bareback with.
Sajer
I heard erectile disfunction or impotence is the signal for heart disease. I am still in mid 30's, but I have so much erection problems in recent years. Now I can only get up 50% or less of the times. Or sometimes I will get erection but by the time I insert it into a woman it shrinks again. I do not have any psychological problem or any stress problem. I still get horny all the time but my son doesn't perform all the time. Is this a possible indication of heart disease?
[QUOTE=RCA Knight]I heard erectile disfunction or impotence is the signal for heart disease. I am still in mid 30's, but I have so much erection problems in recent years. Now I can only get up 50% or less of the times. Or sometimes I will get erection but by the time I insert it into a woman it shrinks again. I do not have any psychological problem or any stress problem. I still get horny all the time but my son doesn't perform all the time. Is this a possible indication of heart disease?[/QUOTE]
This seems like an odd place to ask for information on this subject. If you are worried why dont you see your doctor? I would think it would be worth the money to find out.
How can you really determine that you do not have psychological problems? You could be loony as a toon and the loonieness masks the awareness that you are loony.
Best of luck to you and your son.
Horatio
You are correct that impotence can be a sign of cardiac problems. Afterall, Viagra's famous affect was an accidental discovery while testing as a heart med. A check up might be good for your piece of mind, which might also help your "son".
"Ditto" on the good luck.
FD
RCA
You should get checked up fast. It could be a side effect of diabetes also.
Good luck
RCA - and if you are a bit overweight and thirsty all the time, it is also a possible sign of diabetes (mostly the thirst - the weight is the precursor).
One of the main issues with diabetes is the deterioration of blood vessels to the legs and eyes and many undiagnosed diabetics die from resultant circulatory heart problems.
You aren't describing having libido problems - just physical "issues". A blood test is quick and cheap. GO TALK TO A MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL If you are in Thailand, the test won't cost more than maybe 400B and probably not that much
Hi guys,
I have a couple of questions:
Using a condom and assuming it doesn't brake, am I 100% safe of getting HIV and other diseases?
I'm also thinking of situations like when I am actually removing the condom, my hands will of course touch the condom and whatever tiny trace of blood might be on it, and I might touch a part of my body where I might have a small wound or scratch. Would this be enough to be in the risk zone?
Does anybody know what the statistics say about a guy getting HIV from a girl during normal intercourse? I've heard that it is very low chance of getting HIV as a guy just thru normal intercourse.
I'm going to thailand soon and I have been reading on this forum for quite a while now, and as I'm single and traveling alone I'm up for all kinds of adventures by night - except if it includes the slightest chance of getting infected.
I might be paranoid and too concered about my health - true or not I always get infected by all kinds of viruses - if someone at work is sick, I probably will get the same thing he/she has a couple of days later. That is - my immune system is probably not very good!
As you can guess I have very little experience with prostitutes, mainly because of these concerns.
Slim
[QUOTE=Slim72]Hi guys,
I have a couple of questions:
Using a condom and assuming it doesn't brake, am I 100% safe of getting HIV and other diseases?
I'm also thinking of situations like when I am actually removing the condom, my hands will of course touch the condom and whatever tiny trace of blood might be on it, and I might touch a part of my body where I might have a small wound or scratch. Would this be enough to be in the risk zone?
Does anybody know what the statistics say about a guy getting HIV from a girl during normal intercourse? I've heard that it is very low chance of getting HIV as a guy just thru normal intercourse.
I'm going to thailand soon and I have been reading on this forum for quite a while now, and as I'm single and traveling alone I'm up for all kinds of adventures by night - except if it includes the slightest chance of getting infected.
I might be paranoid and too concered about my health - true or not I always get infected by all kinds of viruses - if someone at work is sick, I probably will get the same thing he/she has a couple of days later. That is - my immune system is probably not very good!
As you can guess I have very little experience with prostitutes, mainly because of these concerns.
Slim[/QUOTE]Mate,
I do not think you are being paranoid. The risks are there. Anyone who plays the P4P game would be kidding himself if he did not acknowledge the risks.
If you are concerned, there are plenty of places where you can get an oily massage and HJ only.
Condoms? I have had them break. It happens, and can be damned scary.
Odds getting HIV when a condom does not break? Slim, but still possible.
One last option is the Thai Red Cross Anonymous Clinic just off Lumpini park and Soi Sarasin. HIV tests there with results in 20 minutes. You could bring a girl there if someting were to go wrong, or even before. At least you would know that she is HIV - (assuming this is the case). But of course the incubation period is 90 days, so you would only know her HIV history up until the 90 days you brought her there with you.
Slim72,
if you are worried that your condom might break then use some lubricant.
Friction is the dead off every condom, so put some lubricant on your best part and lots of it on the condom. That way the condom won't break even if you fuck for hours (already tested :))
RCA,
Being that I am a certified lunatic that has lost his certification documents, maybe I can help you in diagnosing your problem.
Go out and buy yourself some porn or dig some old porn out of your closet. Once you've got the new or old porn in hand, take a gander at it while Spanking-Your-Monkey (masturbating) with the other hand. If you can spank your way to a fully erect orgasm then your erection problem is psychological.
The moral of the story can be stated thusly: an orgasm in hand is better than none in the bush, but at the same time (at least for most of us), the one in the bush can be gotten once all else is forgotten.
poster
P.S. I advise you to heed the advice given by others and get your blood checked. Not only can a blood analysis diagnose diabeties, it can identify liver problems, HIV, and a plethora of other physical problems.
And on a side note, many times after hearing the Doc say, "All system are operating at spec", many people stop having the symptons they thought they were having in the first place. Or put another way, being aware of (factual) reality goes a long way toward dispelling rumors, myths, ghosts, and many other nonexistent supernatural anomalies.
Thanks for all the advices on erectile disfunction. I tried the masterbation method. And I discovered that I can get up almost all the times by hand job myself and achieve ejaculation. And also I forgot to mention in last post that I can always get erect from some to full extend when sex with several of my steady non-pro girls that I do not use condom with.
I will check out my blood pressure and blood analysis to make sure. I am 182cm and always in range 68-71 kilos, quite thin. I start to wonder if I am just too bored of having sex with all these Thai hookers with all the condoms and no kissing and without any emotional excitement for all these years.
Has anyone experience this "bored of pay money sex syndrome" in Thailand??
and your son started not to react to these hookers anymore??
[QUOTE=RCA Knight] Has anyone experience this "bored of pay money sex syndrome" in Thailand?? and your son started not to react to these hookers anymore??[/QUOTE]
Absolutely. On this last trip. If I wasn't hang'n with fellow ISG mongers like 1ball and Traveler (and was it Taz Marine?), I was bored outta my head. Spent more nights in my room with good take out food and bad TV than bar hopping.
I will go back to BNK for dental work, but for mongering, it's time for me to find some new places.
FD
I have to agree with FD and RCA on this one. The fun part, for me at least is looking for Miss Right Now. The actual act, I have found, is becoming more and more mechanical impersonal, and dull. I used to DFK, and DATY, but no more. So it pretty much boils down to BJ, slide on the raincoat, and start pumping. After 90 minutes or so of banging away, I feel like turning on CNN. :D
So, what to do about it ?
Hello everyone on this forum,
First of all, let me thany you all for your advices. It is educational for newbies like me. I have one question for you all. I am kind a guy who like to lick and suck pussies but after reading all this safe sex reports I am wondering whether is it safe thing to do in Thailand. I am planing to visit to Pattaya in early of next year for first time, I would really appreciate your inputs.
Thanks
[QUOTE=Moore2003]I am kind a guy who like to lick and suck pussies but after reading all this safe sex reports I am wondering whether is it safe thing to do in Thailand.[/QUOTE]I've eaten about a billion pussies and assholes, and have never caught anything worse than that-weird-coating-your-mouth-gets that can be cured with Listerine. I've always assumed it was from eating yeast-infected pussies.
Apparently Gonorrhea of the throat is possible, as I've often been throat-swabbed to check for it.
[QUOTE=RCA Knight]Thanks for all the advices on erectile disfunction. I tried the masterbation method. And I discovered that I can get up almost all the times by hand job myself and achieve ejaculation. And also I forgot to mention in last post that I can always get erect from some to full extend when sex with several of my steady non-pro girls that I do not use condom with.
I will check out my blood pressure and blood analysis to make sure. I am 182cm and always in range 68-71 kilos, quite thin. I start to wonder if I am just too bored of having sex with all these Thai hookers with all the condoms and no kissing and without any emotional excitement for all these years.
Has anyone experience this "bored of pay money sex syndrome" in Thailand?
and your son started not to react to these hookers anymore??[/QUOTE]Yes, I have. Reading your post I thought: Oh man, who is writing about my private, personal experiences?
Exact all the things you are writing about happend to me before. I have been to Thailand more than 10x before and sometimes I was bored about the behavior of most of the bargirls, about: "Hello, handsome man, sit down, come inside me" and so on and on. Getting laid with one of them in my room or a shorttime place there was no personal emotion coming from her. Most of them are just doing their business. I can't get angry about that but me and my friend between my legs are missing something. And so it happened that my friend could not do what I came for.
Some hours later, staying alone, I erected him by myself and everything worked (but without a girl staying with me).
Today I'm leaving for Thld. and I'm wondering what will happen to me this time.
Maa Paa
Maa Paa, I can definitely relate. But for me, 10mg of Levitra solves the problem completely. I don't need it for non P4P sex, especially with someone I trust enough to not use a Condom - I never have this issue. And I don't need it when I use my own right hand. But when I P4P with a raincoat on, Junior often doesn't get excited enough on his own. Levitra cures this completely for me.
I agree with Coma. I, too, enjoy "chowing down" and have for years throughout SE Asia. I've never had anything orally. Take the advice from our self appointed "do gooders" and alarmists with a grain of salt. I am not opposed to safe sex, but sometimes the rantings here would lead you to believe that if you leave your hotel without a condom on you're gonna die ! Relax and have fun (with some common sense).
FD
[QUOTE=Maa Paa]Today I'm leaving for Thld. and I'm wondering what will happen to me this time.
Maa Paa[/QUOTE]
Although I can't say I experienced the same feeling, I did get somewhat close to it, and it scared me...
However, the last 3 bar / go-go girls I've been with, last trip, simply said, gave me the feeling they liked me. So there was none of the no-kissing thing.
Actually, one of them seemed to be not very exited in bed, which is why I won't look for her again. But with the other two, it was fun in and out of the sack.
What I'm saying, basically, is look for a girl that likes you. It might be hard, given the amount of acting lessons some of them take ;-) but it's worth it!
[QUOTE=Coma Boy]I've eaten about a billion pussies and assholes[/QUOTE]
Now That's tellin it like it is!
[QUOTE=Firedick]Take the advice from our self appointed "do gooders" and alarmists with a grain of salt. I am not opposed to safe sex, but sometimes the rantings here would lead you to believe that if you leave your hotel without a condom on you're gonna die ! Relax and have fun (with some common sense).
FD[/QUOTE]
In this time and age people have a tough time dealing with the very concept of risk. There is risk in everything we do (walking, driving, eating, etc.) but we hate the idea of taking a risk.
Is there a risk in engaging in intercourse with a promiscuous Thai lady? Of course there is. Is the risk high? Depends.
There are three areas of sex-related risk: pregnancy, STD and HIV. All three can be drastically reduced to the point of becoming negligible by practising safe sex (as in using condoms sensibly). Oral practices are generally considered as low risk behavior.
Risk management means also selecting the P4P TG to reduce the risk. A young lady fresh from the farm will be a much lower risk factor than a zombie from Beach Road in Pattaya.
Like others reported, in 15 years of mongering in Thailand I have never caught anything harmful, although it is true that in recent years I have reduced my sex-related activity in LOS more than I wanted.
I believe that if you are healthy yourself, pick visibly healthy sex partners and exercise some level of common sense in risk management, you can reduce the risk inherent to our hobby to very manageable levels.
It’s called oral-pharyngeal gonorrhea, and usually denotes a strong strain.
[QUOTE=Coma Boy]I've eaten about a billion pussies and assholes, and have never caught anything worse than that-weird-coating-your-mouth-gets that can be cured with Listerine. I've always assumed it was from eating yeast-infected pussies.
Apparently Gonorrhea of the throat is possible, as I've often been throat-swabbed to check for it.[/QUOTE]
experiences, and it gets more pronounced as you get older. I prefer one that kisses and does the full GFE thing, always works for me. I’ve been lucky on my recent trips; I seem to find a nicely compatible gal….
[QUOTE=Maa Paa]Yes, I have. Reading your post I thought: Oh man, who is writing about my private, personal experiences?
Exact all the things you are writing about happend to me before. I have been to Thailand more than 10x before and sometimes I was bored about the behavior of most of the bargirls, about: "Hello, handsome man, sit down, come inside me" and so on and on. Getting laid with one of them in my room or a shorttime place there was no personal emotion coming from her. Most of them are just doing their business. I can't get angry about that but me and my friend between my legs are missing something. And so it happened that my friend could not do what I came for.
Some hours later, staying alone, I erected him by myself and everything worked (but without a girl staying with me).
Today I'm leaving for Thld. and I'm wondering what will happen to me this time.
Maa Paa[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Anon Sailor]It’s called oral-pharyngeal gonorrhea, and usually denotes a strong strain.[/QUOTE]It sounds particularly unpleasant.
I've never caught Gonorrhea in any form, yet a friend of mine has had it twice in the last two months, plus once in the throat.
No doubt it's possible to catch a whole host of nasties. I love riding motorcycles. Am I going to give it up cause it's inherently dangerous ? No. We make our choices and accept the consequenses. That's what adults do.
FD
Can you get generic Viagra -Penegra, Kamagra, and Caeverta- from any pharmacy on Sukhumvit around Nana and Soi Cowboy? I'm concerned about using the [url]www.rx-mex.net[/url] from the land of the free.
Guys,
I have a funny feeling when I am readng through the posts here which I shall explain why. I was at LOS about 1.5 month ago with a Thai WL. She is healthy looking, petite and her pussy has no foul smell what so ever. Out we went for a night out at some disco and once we reach my room, in the midst of sexual excitement and presence of alcohol, we did it bare.
After about 3 weeks I beginning to experience the classic symptoms of Chlamydia, and my full STD report confirms it. Now this is a rather easy to clear STD: a 1-day dose of Zithromax, also the symptoms are not that nasty. I just got it cleared about a week ago.
I have been mongering for about 5 years now and never have I gotten anything from eating pussy, BBBJ and FK. I am quite certain I got it from her cause she was my only partner for the last 2 months and did it bare too. She is about 25 and has been in the business for about 2 years.
My points here are:
- Just because the TG looks younger, clean and healthy and does not smell, I would not put my money on her NOT carrying any STD. In fact, Hepatitis A and B, which are not STD per se, are more infectious than HIV and some other STD. (Chlamydia is more of a STD cause the germs live in semen fluid and vaginal fluid, thus it is usually transferred during non protected intercourse and not just kissing.)
- For my part I do think oral sex (DATY, BJ, FK...) has lower STD risk factor.
- As cliche as it gets, guys, wear your condom! :)
- Lastly, clean up thoroughly before and after every battle! (Advice from my Chlamydia doctor :D)
Kick ass and be cool,
Kaki (Legs in Malay)
[QUOTE=Kaki]Guys,
I have a funny feeling when I am readng through the posts here which I shall explain why. I was at LOS about 1.5 month ago with a Thai WL. She is healthy looking, petite and her pussy has no foul smell what so ever. Out we went for a night out at some disco and once we reach my room, in the midst of sexual excitement and presence of alcohol, we did it bare.
My points here are:
- Just because the TG looks younger, clean and healthy and does not smell, I would not put my money on her NOT carrying any STD. In fact, Hepatitis A and B, which are not STD per se, are more infectious than HIV and some other STI. (Almost all Chlamydia cases are thorugh sexual contact, cause the germs live in semen fluid and vaginal fluid.)
- For my part I do think oral sex (DATY, BJ, FK...) has lower STD risk factor.
- As cliche as it gets, guys, wear your condom! :)
- Lastly, clean up thoroughly before and after every battle! (Advice from my Chlamydia doctor :D)
Kick ass and be cool,
Kaki (Legs in Malay)[/QUOTE]
Every monger should at the very least get both Hep B and Hep A vaccinations. Chances of getting both are higher than STD, whether you're covered or not. Eating out, french kissing are just very easy ways of transmission.
In the states and most Asian countries, hep b vaccine is given as a routine to all newborns. So why wouldn't you protect yourself?
As a life long carrier of hep B (pre-natal transmission), take my word for it - you don't want to contract either!
[QUOTE=Traveler1234]Every monger should at the very least get both Hep B and Hep A vaccinations. Chances of getting both are higher than STD, whether you're covered or not. Eating out, french kissing are just very easy ways of transmission.
In the states and most Asian countries, hep b vaccine is given as a routine to all newborns. So why wouldn't you protect yourself?
As a life long carrier of hep B (pre-natal transmission), take my word for it - you don't want to contract either![/QUOTE]
Traveler1234 is spot on.
These are not really STD per se as I have said, and it is 100 times easier to contract than HIV. Unfortunately I was not jabbed with these 2 vaccines although I am asian...so I just pay for them. Hehe.
Kaki
OK I had a friend who just came back from thailand and told me that this story happened to him and It sounds a bit strange to me so I would like some input as to if this was real or not.
My friend picked this SW up outside a local bar and took her back to his room for some nightly fun via a resteraunt. They both had some food and something to drink. He got back to the hotel and about 10 minutes into the event he felt a bit drained ( no pun here guys ), next thing he knew it was 14 hours later and he was about 1000 usd lighter.
One of his friends told him that he had been ruffied and rolled.
Now I have not heard this happeneing in thailand and I am not sure that he is just saying this because he spent too much money and is ashamed to say so after a week there or its true.
his friend told him that it happens regularly and that ruffies are available over the counter, which seems a bit strange to me but hey thats why I am here cause I dont know and I am asking you guys.
your comments?? ......
[QUOTE=Deep Diver]OK I had a friend who just came back from thailand and told me that this story happened to him and It sounds a bit strange to me so I would like some input as to if this was real or not.
My friend picked this SW up outside a local bar and took her back to his room for some nightly fun via a resteraunt. They both had some food and something to drink. He got back to the hotel and about 10 minutes into the event he felt a bit drained ( no pun here guys ), next thing he knew it was 14 hours later and he was about 1000 usd lighter.
One of his friends told him that he had been ruffied and rolled.
Now I have not heard this happeneing in thailand and I am not sure that he is just saying this because he spent too much money and is ashamed to say so after a week there or its true.
his friend told him that it happens regularly and that ruffies are available over the counter, which seems a bit strange to me but hey thats why I am here cause I dont know and I am asking you guys.
your comments?? ......[/QUOTE]Sounds very much like something that happened to me last summer. Too much to drink and already had fun with short-timer from Soi Zero. Around 2 in the morning decided to check out Nana parking lot. Brought two back to room at Majestic Grande Hotel. Showers, beers, a little fooling around. Next thing I know it is 6 pm the next day (actually I guess the same day -- but was 16 hours later), alone in hotel, camera gone, jewelry gone, 2,000 in US travelers checks gone. Wallet with US$ and Thai baht untouched for some reason, and I was able to get travelers checks replaced. Big, big bummer, but could have been worse.
[QUOTE=Deep Diver]Now I have not heard this happeneing in Thailand...[/QUOTE]It happens all the time. And not just in TH, all over SE-Asia.
[QUOTE=Coma Boy]It happens all the time. And not just in TH, all over SE-Asia.[/QUOTE]
It's not the first I've heard of it either - and as you say, Coma, not just in LOS.
Exactly why I do not carry with me excess cash. When in hotels, I lock the balance in the safe; when here at home (BKK), have locking drawers where I keep cash, cameras, etc.
But sorry to hear of another episode....
The only time someone attempted to drug me it just gave me an intense and very weird high.
I stayed conscious through the sex, had the girl leave, and then for some reason wandered the streets in a daze and somehow arrived back home and passed out. Felt very strange for the next 24 hours.
I guess it is a good idea to practice taking such drugs recreationally so as to build up a slight immunity.
Coma,
"I guess it is a good idea to practice taking such drugs recreationally so as to build up a slight immunity."
:D[size=+2]![/size]
Deep Diver,
Was 'your friend' also taken for a ride by some guys who claimed they knew where to play a cardgame with nuttin' but gain?
ah, yes, "safety" from a "short term perspective"
(cb - this is not intended at you, just responding to the "premise")
as to robbery - personally, i use a motion sensitive 120db computer theft alarm that would wake the entire floor so someone would notice what was happening (aside from the fact that i also put "cash" into the lockbox - so it's safe there)
i don't quite understand some folks - if you have concerns about drugging, you don't drink anything you haven't opened then you drink it all and another party never gets their hands on it. (particularly important when dealing with 3-somes) it's either that or have her take a drink first (find some simple excuse to offer it to her. if she won't drink it - caveat emptor). i seem to recall some discussion long ago and far away about rohyphenol (the "date [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord123][CodeWord123][/url] drug" - the "mickey finn" - might have munged the spelling) on tits where you would get a knockout dose when you licked (easily cured, of course, by "ap-nam duay" - make sure you well wash anything you want to lick)
too much thinking with the "little head" - and as to the guy who got "rolled" for the 40000b ($1000us) why was he so stupid as to be toting that much cash anyway? undoubtedly, he was also dealing with a beach road lady (no contact info, no work location, no longer in pattaya after departure (at least for the following month or so)) if i get rolled, they will get at most 3000b (mostly in small bills - that's the most i tote at one time, usually less) plus my cyber-dictionary (if they want it), maybe my laptop if i am carrying it and didn't lock it up (yeah, it's the potentially "expensive" loss, maybe $750 us) and whatever clothes they want to carry (assuming they get by the audio alarm and hit the "clean" bag instead of the "laundry" bag) of course, i doubt that most would wnat anything "large" - it makes them too "obvious". another option is to take a picture of her and her id and then lock up the camera - at least then there would be a "starting point".
at least it doesn't happen that frequently. (or in any event isn't reported that frequently)
This Soi 33 BG can be found at The Office. She has herpes and claims she takes holiday when she is in outbreak, which is false. She speaks perfect English and has many sending her money. Someone on this site could be the next victim. Just warning fellow mongers. Peace.
[QUOTE=Wilpower]This Soi 33 BG can be found at The Office. She has herpes and claims she takes holiday when she is in outbreak, which is false. She speaks perfect English and has many sending her money. Someone on this site could be the next victim. Just warning fellow mongers. Peace.[/QUOTE]Will I spoke to Bob at The Office recently and she is MIA.
[QUOTE=Pedro Chilli]13/11/2005 12:02:50 PM
( Source: Reuters)
Man claims to have beaten HIV virus
LONDON (Reuters) - A man claimed on Sunday to be the first person to become clear of the HIV virus, which can lead to AIDS, after earlier testing positive for it.
[/QUOTE]
This is interesting. An individual was tested positive for antibodies that are linked to HIV and later was tested negative. There are two ways to explain this.
a. This fortunate individual owns a body that has been able to eradicate singlehandedly not only the deadly virus for which there is no known cure, but also all trace of the antibodies to that virus that made him test positive in the first place.
b. The HIV tests are unreliable.
In science, the easiest explanation is often the best one. In all fairness, if the second test had been run consecutively rather than after a long time, this would have been called a "false positive" and the lucky guy would hav been told he was OK right away.
The real problem with accepting that the tests are unreliable is that those possibly worthless tests are the only reason why people are diagnosed HIV positive and submitted to dreadful drug cocktails that are likely to destroy one's immune system as effectively as HIV itself is supposed to do it. This is called AIDS by prescription.
There is definitely something fishy about the whole AIDS theory.
Here's the story:
[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4432564.stm[/url]
He must be fucking happy.
Seydlitz,
"The real problem with accepting that the tests are unreliable is that those possibly worthless tests are the only reason why people are diagnosed HIV positive and submitted to dreadful drug cocktails that are likely to destroy one's immune system as effectively as HIV itself is supposed to do it. This is called AIDS by prescription."
So 20 million (source: Elsevier) aids deaths in Lesotho, Zimbabwe, Cambodia and other extremely poor countries were all caused by very expensive 'dreadful drug cocktails'?
You are kidding, right:(?
[QUOTE=Freeler]Seydlitz,
So 20 million (source: Elsevier) aids deaths in Lesotho, Zimbabwe, Cambodia and other extremely poor countries were all caused by very expensive 'dreadful drug cocktails'?
You are kidding, right:(?[/QUOTE]
You are totally right. Deaths in the Third World cannot be attibuted to tritherapies atc. But AIDS in the Third World is a different thing than in the rich countries, if only in definitions. My comment was appropriate only for us rich boys.
In the US, you need two Elisa and one WB test positive to be HIV positive. In the Third World as per the WHO definition agreed upon at the Bangui Conference, no need for tests; you only need clinical symptoms (fever, dysenteria, etc.). Unfortunately these symptoms are regrettably common in Africa and elsewhere.
It is likely though that if tests were administered to African patients many too would turn positivee, but that would not mean much since their bodies are loaded with antibodies for hosts of tropical diseases.
My point here is not that AIDS does not exist nor that HIV causes it , just that the antibody tests are non-specific, and therefore unreliable. Let's not turn this into an AIDS debate, just one on the tests.
As a matter of considerable surprise for most people, AIDS in Africa is a different thing since it is non-gender specific (50% male and 50% female victims), while AIDS in the US and Europe never broke out to the general population and remains confined to the initial risk groups. I am talking of AIDS cases, not HIV infections.
[QUOTE=Seydlitz]This is interesting. An individual was tested positive for antibodies that are linked to HIV and later was tested negative. There are two ways to explain this.
a. This fortunate individual owns a body that has been able to eradicate singlehandedly not only the deadly virus for which there is no known cure, but also all trace of the antibodies to that virus that made him test positive in the first place.
b. The HIV tests are unreliable.
In science, the easiest explanation is often the best one. In all fairness, if the second test had been run consecutively rather than after a long time, this would have been called a "false positive" and the lucky guy would hav been told he was OK right away.
The real problem with accepting that the tests are unreliable is that those possibly worthless tests are the only reason why people are diagnosed HIV positive and submitted to dreadful drug cocktails that are likely to destroy one's immune system as effectively as HIV itself is supposed to do it. This is called AIDS by prescription.
There is definitely something fishy about the whole AIDS theory.[/QUOTE]
Yes, that’s interesting, but let’s not forget that this case was diagnosed by the British NHS, one of the most disorganised and inefficient health services in the industrialized world, so I find it hardly surprising.
Chances are the tests were flawed when he first tested positive and that went unnoticed by the NHS till one year later. There are a number of reasons why an HIV test can fail, especially in the NHS, where blunders abound.
Think of it this way: What is more likely: a blunder by the British NHS or that this Scottish guy has an immune system capable of destroying, for the first time in medical history, the HIV virus?
Few years ago there was a report about certain people in Africa (women, I believe) who tested positive for HIV antibodies but never got the disease itself. I forgot who published the report but I am sure googling will find it.
Duniawalla,
Yeah, hookers in Kenya.
Guess why that story died...:(
Seydlitz, Freeler, Duni, Gladiator,
the ELISA test is usually used for AIDS/HIV tests. The ELISA is very sensitive but not very specific, therefore a positiv result doesn't necessarily mean to really have been infected with the HIV virus.
To verify the result a more specific test is made, which doesn't look for antibodies like the ELISA but for the DNS/DNA of the virus itself. If you test positiv this time you are definately infected.
The mentioned case refers to a British guy who tested postiv in May 2002. 14 months later he tested negative but he refused to show up again at the hospital for further tests.
BTW, the statement of the hospital that "they hadn't made any mistakes" at the first test is just a result of the interference of the guys lawyers. This guy tried to sue the hospital for false testing. Only after that attempt the hospital ensured everybody that their first test was ok.
Regarding African women (mostly from Kenya) who had unprotected sex with HIV infected men and didn't got infected :
Doctors believe that a gene - which was detected in the mid 90's - for a protein named CCRS might be responsible for it. The HIV virus needs this protein to enter a human body cell. People who carry a modified version of this molecule seem to have at least a limited protection against HIV.
Traveler,
As far as I understand, the ELISA test (patented by the very same Dr. Gallo who "discovered AIDS if I remember well) is administered first. If negative, you are OK. If positive, you get a second ELISA. If negative, you are OK. That is a "false positive. If positive, you get a Western Blot test. If negative, you are OK, false positie again, if you are positive, then you are HIV-positive.
The WB test is an antibody test too, but more sensitive. This is a cut and paste of [url]http://www.msichicago.org/ed/AIDS/hivtst3.htm[/url].
"The problem is that some proteins found in HIV are similar to proteins found in other infectious agents. As a result, just because something in the serum binds to a protein from HIV does not necessarily mean that HIV is present. For this reason, the Western Blot is more accurate than the ELISA test because it can indicate what, exactly, is binding to what. However, the ELISA test is easier and less expensive and can detect infection earlier. In combination, the two tests make a good team."
And also:
"In this [the WB] test, the proteins of HIV are laid out vertically, from largest to smallest, on a strip of film. Serum is added and any existing HIV antibodies will bind to the HIV antigens. A detection enzyme is then added, which latches on to the antibodies. Finally, a chemical is added that changes color when it comes into contact with the protein-antibody-enzyme layers. This multi-layer process is similar to that of the ELISA test. However, the final result is a unique series of shaded bands.
Interpretation of the Western Blot can be complicated, but a good rule of thumb is the "3 band rule": If three or more bands appear, there is solid evidence that antibodies to HIV have been detected. If one or two bands appear, the test is considered indeterminate. If a patient with an indeterminate test has engaged in high risk behavior, another test should be conducted in six months."
I am only aware of one other test that is conducted, the so called viral load test (the PCR test by Roche for example), but that is mostly for people who are diagnosed with AIDS, in order to monitor the progress of their current treatment. There are two kinds of viral load tests (PCR and bDNA). They both measure the amount of HIV RNA in a sample. (RNA being the "blueprint" that HIV uses to make more virus.) When comparing viral load test results to determine a trend, the same type of test must be used each time.
This is all high level bioscience, but as far as I read in various places, unfortunately the HIV virus has never really been fully isolated, and cannot be cultured in vitro to this day. The best work done in hat area was by Gallo's team in the early days, and they had to mix samples serums from several people to get a result that would be useable.
In all logic, in the absence of a true "golden standard", ie. a pure form of the virus that satisfies Koch's 3 postulates, there can be no test that is specific (ie detecting that virus and only that virus), and therefore no reliable test, be it one testing for antibodies, or even one testing for the RNA of the virus.
And then of course that does not help the debate about whether HIV truly exists (there are lots of retroviruses after all, all harmless to us except that one), and whether it can actually produce AIDS, alone or together with something else (a more and more attractive proposition).
It is allright to stick to the official gospel, but if you have an open and curious mind, you start reading, and thinking by yourself, and then it does not seem to add up so well. Nothing seems so sure, and a lot of things seem weird.
Seydlitz,
absolutely correct.
ELISA is used for other kinds of tests as well. It can be "trimmed" for other kinds of infections. It is extremely sensitive but not very specific, just as you say. The more specific test is not always made with the WB, sometimes other tests are used which discover some strains of the DNA/DNS of the virus itself, not just the antibodies. But if the WB is used it is exactly as you say.
I don't want to discuss if HIV exists or not. I find that discussion very stupid. The millions of dead people should be prove enough, at least they are for me. I guess some people are just looking for an excuse to keep going with their risky behaviour. Sex is one of these things were people and their behaviour are merely driven by emotions than by a rational diagnosis. If guys have a prob with condoms (some have and can't get a hard on due to lack of sensitivity) they look for an excuse or try to lie to themselves. I prefer to be rather "safe than sorry".
[blue][Commercial Advertisement deleted by Admin][/blue]
[size=-2][b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted because appeared to be a commercial message and/or it contained links to a commercial website. Please post reports consisting primarily of a commercial nature and/or reports with a link or links to commercial websites in the Classified Advertisement section of the Forum. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines and the Forum's FAQ for further information.[/blue][/size]
[QUOTE=Zegna]For a totally good time with Asian girls go to this website:[/QUOTE]You spamming prick!
I just followed that link you posted and read this:
[QUOTE]Step Two: Go to ANY forum and post a NEW thread which includes the Link of **********.Com . Attention: <1>The thread MUST be posted By You and it Must include the Link of **********.Com!<2>Do NOT post a thread in the SAME Forum where the thread about **********Com has already existed! (because the moderator will think you are a spammer if there are many threads about **********.Com in the same forum.). Please follow our rules before you post a thread,otherwise, we won't activate your account. Finally, you Must make sure your thread will NOT be deleted by moderator.
How to assure your thread will NOT be deleted by moderator: Do NOT post a thread like a spammer. You can post a thread about anything which includes the Link of **********.Com. That's enough. For example, you can add the Link of **********.Com as your signature, or you can post a thread about anything you are interested in; like cars, computers, life, etc, what you have to do is to make sure the Link of **********.Com is included in your thread, that's all. Please post your thread skillfully. Good Luck!
Step Three : Activate your account with your thread link, your accout will be activated right away if your thread link is valid. Then, you can start an exciting free tour, browing thousands of photos without charge.[/QUOTE]
I suppose he just wanted a "free" porn site access. As long as he doesn't come back....
[QUOTE=Dinghy]I suppose he just wanted a "free" porn site access. As long as he doesn't come back....[/QUOTE]
I agree with Coma Boy on this. Pure SPAM. Reported it, too.
Hi,
Just came home from Thailand and before the trip I thought I wouldn't go with a prostitute down there.
But things turned out differently.
I'm freaked out about getting HIV, but when drunk I obviously don't think about that.
I met one girl in Koh Samui, she was 28 and spoke some english. After turning down offers from all beatiful girls down there for a week, this one was sitting alone and drinking a beer and looked bored. I was drunk and decided to cheer her up.
She did cheer up and we talked for 2 hours or so, and when the sun came up she asked me if I wanted to see her place.
Sure, I thought, and we went to her place, and t didn't take long before she started seducing me and well, we had sex.
For quite a time I may add, since I have a hard problem cumming when Im drunk.
We used protection, but not when she went down on me, and at some point she stuck her finger in my mouth, which she just had in her pussy.
There was no payment involved, she told me she wa bored and that she just wanted to sleep with someone for once who was young and fit.
I asked her how she earned money and she said she searched for farang boyfriends who could give her money.
Naive as I was, I didn't think she was a hooker before she told me that.Anyway, then she drove me back to my hotel.
Also in bangkok I met one girl late one night from cambodja who was 35. About the same story there. We talked for a while, and she came back with me to my hotel and we had sex. Protected of course, but when she went down on me she removed the comdom.
No payment involved here either a we hit it off very good and she probably thought I would stay longer (I left thailand the next day).
Now Im freaked out about getting HIV. I've read 1 million ppl out of what, 60 million, has HIV in Thailand.
Don't even want to think of what the stats says about Cambodja...
I asked the last girl if she had any diseases I should know about and she laughed and said "no, just got tested. Get tested every 3 months".
Of course, she may have lied.
The first girl however, I didn't ask.
Seeing all ppl here reporting having had sex with many many thaigirls without catching anything untreatable has calmed my mind a bit, and I dont have any symptoms (yet) of having anything, except being jetlagged and sunburned.
What do you guys think, am I overstressed about this or do you think I have made a serious mistake of letting them get down on me unprotected?
Slim
[QUOTE=Wilpower]This Soi 33 BG can be found at The Office. She has herpes and claims she takes holiday when she is in outbreak, which is false. She speaks perfect English and has many sending her money. Someone on this site could be the next victim. Just warning fellow mongers. Peace.[/QUOTE]Here is a better picture of Kate.
Plenty of these young starlets have Herpes. Nowhere near as many as those with Chlamydia but still plenty.
The things to be aware of with Herpes are that you don't want to be around during outbreak time, and that it is just as easy to catch around your mouth as it is on your wiener.
When bar-girls want to turn off the lights, this isn't always due to repulsion or shyness. Let the buyer beware.
Slim72,
calm down.
As far as I know the number of HIV infected people is much less than the number you mentioned. And the probability of contracting HIV through an uncovered BJ is not very big, even though it is above null.
Girls are usually more in danger than men. The surface of their vagina is much bigger as of your penis and it's more sensitive to injuries. Furthermore the virus load in saliva is muss less than in ejaculate and again the surface within the mouth is much bigger than of your penis and also more sensitive to injuries.
Don't get me wrong, I don't say that going unprotected bears a small risk - protect yourself and your partners - but no need to freak out.
What I do not understand is, if you are really so worried, why did you allow them to give you an unprotected BJ ?
Don't say you were drunk ! If you loose your self-control when being drunk then don't drink or at least not as much as you obviously did.
007sam,
how do you know that she is a herpes carrier ?
Did you contracted it by her or do you only try to pay her back by outing her ?
Guess we all are quite grateful for such an info, but only if it's correct and not some sort of personal war.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]007sam,
how do you know that she is a herpes carrier ?
Did you contracted it by her or do you only try to pay her back by outing her ?
Guess we all are quite grateful for such an info, but only if it's correct and not some sort of personal war.[/QUOTE]I have no reason to give anything but the facts, it is a 100% fact. I have no need to defend myself, just giving out the factual info.
i had a little skin peeling off from the shaft of the penis. i was thinking could it be some fungus or some allergy reaction to condom or the worst scenario std. but it was not obvious at all so left it for few weeks not taking any care of it.
some days ago i was eating at amari atrium so decided to make a visit to bangkok hospital in soi soonvijai. the hospital was so nice and modern and it was my first trip so i registered and all the receptionists can speak very good english. then a receptionist took me upstairs to see a docter. tuned out to be an older female dermatologist.
she looked at it for less than 10 seconds and concluded it was condom allergy and shows sign of eczema, no big deal. and prescribed some topical cream and some anti-allergy pills. that's it. cost was 1300 for 30 seconds of check up plus 10 little allergy pills and one small bottle of eczema cream that you can buy in drug store for 30 bahts and 15 bahts.
the only good thing about bangkok hospital is many cutie nurses walking around. and all of them speak good english. i remenbered i went to yanhee hospital last year for some root canal dental work and yanhee has so many cutie nurses that keep me going back even i finished my dental already and i had to find some other problems such as detox or facial cleasing ect to go back there just to chat around with all these cutie nurses. got a few numbers but did not turn into anything exciting. bangkok hospital too has nice high level cutie nurses. but in semitevij hospital, there are many cute young lady docters in the dental and dermatalogy departments that are over scale 8.
okay, about the cost. i have been to bunrumgrad, semitevij, payathai and now bangkok hospital, they are all really expensive. everytime way over 1000 bahts for a simple docter visit. i will never go again for small problems any more. i remember one time i went into chulalornkorn hospital, a public hospital, for some leg pain from over walking. only cost 120 bahts all together with medicine. and the chula hospital doctors can speak good english as well. i will stick to chula hospital for minor problems from now on.
by the way, if you are allergic to latex condom, always wash well after use to get rid of all the chemicals from the latex. then apply some moisture lotion to your penis to supply enough moisture to prevent over drying and flaking. then eczema can be avoided.
I posted a report with photo for those that
are latex intolerant or just don't like rubber.
Cheers
[QUOTE=RCA Knight]
Okay, about the cost. I have been to Bunrumgrad, Semitevij, Payathai and now Bangkok Hospital, they are all really expensive. Everytime way over 1000 bahts for a simple docter visit. I will never go again for small problems any more. I remember one time I went into Chulalornkorn Hospital, a public hospital, for some leg pain from over walking. Only cost 120 bahts all together with medicine. And the Chula Hospital doctors can speak good English as well. I will stick to Chula Hospital for minor problems from now on.
[/QUOTE]
Back in September, on my flight from HK to Bkk, a crown came loose and luckily I didn't swallow it. As soon as I landed, walked over to BP as I was staying at the Ascot on Soi 4 (gave me a chance to check out the action during the day time).
Up to the dental clinic, 5 minute wait, 30 minute session with dentist (middle age female, spoke excellent English) to clean and put back the crown. Total cost B$1,300....no way I could have gotten that done back in the states on such notice unless it happened on my home turf and with my own dentist.
Pleasantly surprised at level of service and low fees, IMHO.
Here is an interesting conundrum and hope one of my more learned colleagues can assist.
I have to state am a lover of abalone and nothing gives me more pleasure than being able to enjoy a nice session of wandering my tongue in the nehter regions. However after this recent trip I may have to reconsider the wisdom of this.
Came down with a fever and passing it off as usual run of the mill left it for a few days. When I went to the doctor he informed me the tonsils were really inflamed and that had a bacterial throat infection. Normally a course of antimycillin(forgive the incorrect spelling) should have cleared this up. But one week later it is still hammering away.
One of my more witty friends then asked me if i had been going down on any nice young ladies as this could well be the source of the infection.
Any truth in this and does anyone know of a good cure to end this one ? More importantly how to avoid in the future. Once she has all soaped up there is no telling whether or not there is a bacteria lurking in the nether regions.
I look forward to your earnest support
Chalky,
That's a lotta words to say you've been eatin' pussy:)!
If your doctor gave you antimycin, then you apparently have a fungus.
Fungii are easy to get and next to impossible to get rid of. It will just keep on livin' in your throat and every now and then it will make its presence known - time for you to see the doctor.
[QUOTE=007sam]I have no reason to give anything but the facts, it is a 100% fact. I have no need to defend myself, just giving out the factual info.[/QUOTE]
Sam,
that's no answer to my question.
So please tell us, how do you know ?
Got infected by her or what else ?
Thanks
007sam,
got it.
BTW, I didn't ask for any proof (and don't see your PM as proof either) just wanted to know how you knew about it.
Broken Condom!!
So while waiting for a cd to burn, I went into a massage parlour in Pattaya, found a cutie that massaged me. She upselled the boom boom for 1000, a little high but she was sooooo cute. 20 Yrs old.
As soon as she got the money tho, her attitude changed a little. For the worse. Anyway my dick was covered in Oil based lube and I rinsed it off because oil and condoms never go together.
COndom went on and she was happily pounding away. But after 10 secs something didnt feel right and I told her to get off. Condom had broken. I freaked out and ran to the bathroom and rinsed and scrubbed (Not hard) with shampoo and soap. She said she didnt have HIV. That was a little load off my mind.
I have been reading up on the risks, and the risks are low from what I have been reading and plus the short contact. But still listen up pplz.
BRING YOUR OWN CONDOMS AND LUBE!!!!!
[QUOTE=Chalky26]Here is an interesting conundrum and hope one of my more learned colleagues can assist.
I have to state am a lover of abalone and nothing gives me more pleasure than being able to enjoy a nice session of wandering my tongue in the nehter regions. However after this recent trip I may have to reconsider the wisdom of this.
Came down with a fever and passing it off as usual run of the mill left it for a few days. When I went to the doctor he informed me the tonsils were really inflamed and that had a bacterial throat infection. Normally a course of antimycillin(forgive the incorrect spelling) should have cleared this up. But one week later it is still hammering away.
One of my more witty friends then asked me if i had been going down on any nice young ladies as this could well be the source of the infection.
Any truth in this and does anyone know of a good cure to end this one ? More importantly how to avoid in the future. Once she has all soaped up there is no telling whether or not there is a bacteria lurking in the nether regions.
I look forward to your earnest support[/QUOTE]
I'm allergic to penecillin so whenever I got any viral, fungal or bacterial infections, I take propolis, the more concentrated the better. It's a Bee product and is a natural antibiotic, and damn powerful too.
Cheers
Tee Vee
Hi folks
I had some wear and tear issues during my last trip last April. I went to a local (Cincinnati) clinic to get tested about a week ago. Got HIV, Syphilis and Hepatitis tests. All negative. No worries. Keep it wrapped, use lube and shower before and after.
My Doc referred to sex with a sex worker if you use a condom as "pretty low risk".
Just a little something to put your mind to rest in case you are paranoid as I am.
Happy Hunting!
[QUOTE=Fly for Thai]Hi folks
I had some wear and tear issues during my last trip last April. I went to a local (Cincinnati) clinic to get tested about a week ago. Got HIV, Syphilis and Hepatitis tests. All negative. No worries. Keep it wrapped, use lube and shower before and after.
My Doc referred to sex with a sex worker if you use a condom as "pretty low risk".
Just a little something to put your mind to rest in case you are paranoid as I am.
Happy Hunting![/QUOTE]
Read my post on "Bangkok 2005 Reports" re hepatitis A and B.....be safe.
While fucking with a young (she said 19 yo) Thai girl (professional prostitute) taking her from the back my condom broke.
I realized it just when I came out, so I have been fucking her for about 2 minutes with my glandis in contact with her vagina and sexual fluid.
I immediately washed it carefully with plenty of soap and water, I pissed, and I watched and carefully examinated my penis: no any sign of little scares, or cuts, or wounds or red skin, the skin was normal as usual.
Supposing that the girl is 100% HIV positive.
What do you think is the risk of getting HIV?
What the risk to get other diseases?
Should I use any special cream or medicaments to prevent other diseases?
Thanks for sharing your experiences and knowledge!
Actually I'm quite sure that, as all the skin of my penis was perfectly intact, there is no way HIV could have been transmitted to me, but who knows?
[QUOTE=Lorenz]While fucking with a young (she said 19 yo) Thai girl (professional prostitute) taking her from the back my condom broke.
[/QUOTE]
Lorenz,
I strongly advise you to edit the first sentence or Domino will be after you endlessly for not checking her ID.
[QUOTE=Lorenz]
...
Supposing that the girl is 100% HIV positive
What do you think is the risk of getting HIV?
Should I use any special cream or medicaments to prevent other diseases?
[/QUOTE]
The risk of transmitting HIV from a woman to a man is much smaller than vice versa, but it still exists. Who knows, maybe you got a lucky draw :(
Don't be too concerned, as long as there was no direct contact between any of her body fluids and your blood no need to worry. But remember, even if you haven't seen any scratches at your penis, there are always some microscopic ones, big enough for the virus to enter your body. On the other hand, a specific virus load is needed to get infected.
As far as I know there is some sort of medication which should be taken as soon as possible after the incident. It is some anti viral stuff to reduce any potential virus load to help your immune system, but I don't remember the name ((TAMIFLU ?). Best would be to visit a good hospital, any of the Bumrungrad for example, they should know.
Don't forget to make a HIV check in about 3 months to know for sure.
Hi guys,
On my recent visit to Bangkok decided to have a check up for all parameters, had my check up done at Bumrngrad, should say the hospital is professional and good quality services.
Would recommend anyone in the need of medical assistance of all types.
Cheers,
Boots
[QUOTE=Lorenz]
Supposing that the girl is 100% HIV positive.
What do you think is the risk of getting HIV? What the risk to get other diseases? Should I use any special cream or medicaments to prevent other diseases?
[/QUOTE]
The only truly effective remedy is deflowering a virgin at midnight on a full moon night while laying on a bed of freshly cut flowers.
[QUOTE=Lorenz]
Thanks for sharing your experiences and knowledge!
[/QUOTE]
You are most welcome :)
Seriously, you should not worry about HIV. Other STDs on the other hand are fairly easy to catch, and the cure to some is VERY unpleasant.
Incidentally, the remedy I suggested above is what the upper class in Victorian Britain actually believed would cure syphilis. Many were disappointed.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Lorenz,
..As far as I know there is some sort of medication which should be taken as soon as possible after the incident. It is some anti viral stuff to reduce any potential virus load to help your immune system, but I don't remember the name ((TAMIFLU ?). Best would be to visit a good hospital, any of the Bumrungrad for example, they should know..[/QUOTE]It's not Tamiflu - that's for the regular flu or, now, birdflu. What needs to be taken are the same drug cocktails that an HIV+ person would take, as soon as possible after exposure. Bumrungrad should be able to help. If you're really worried, don't wait.
SCHOOLS
Chaturon okay with condom machine plan
SIRIKUL BUNNAG
The Education Ministry has no objection to the Public Health Ministry's plan to install condom-dispensing machines in schools, said Education Minister Chaturon Chaisaeng yesterday. The scheme had been proposed once before but a fierce outcry from conservatives forced the Public Health Ministry to back down.
The plan is being dusted off by health authorities who said it would help contain the spread of HIV/Aids and other sexually-transmitted diseases among youngsters.
Mr Chaturon yesterday said he has no objection to the plan, but suggested that, in light of public sensitivity, schools and universities should have the freedom to decide whether or not to allow condom-dispensing machines on their premises.
The institutions which agree to join the project must also work with the Public Health Ministry to organise sex education and HIV/Aids prevention programmes on their premises, he added.
Mr Chaturon said it is imperative that the two ministries work together to systematically promote the right value and perception about sex among the young.
'Young people must be made aware of the choice they have and of the proper path they should be taking,'' he stressed.
The education minister said the decision by academic institutions to join the scheme must not be profit-oriented. ''If that was the case, then the move would be no different from putting up condom dispensers in a hotel,'' Mr Chaturon said.
People who oppose the plan must try to see the gravity of the HIV/Aids situation in the country. Some of the measures launched to contain the HIV/Aids spread may be perceived as being unconventional and indiscreet on the surface, he said, ''but the question begging an answer is whether it is more acceptable to watch more and more young people get infected with Aids''.He said the issue was considered ''taboo'' in Thai society and thus always triggered a controversy whenever it was raised for public discussion
[QUOTE=Macho Dik]Will a guys gets any STD (aside from Herpes) when he did a licking spree on the Pussies of the *****s? Will appreciated your advises.[/QUOTE]Aside from Herpes it seems safe enough.
I've eaten a couple of thousand and the only thing I ever catch is some weird coating in the inside of my mouth, which either just goes away after 24 hours or can be banished with Listerine.
[b]SYPHILIS[/b]
[color=red]what is Syphilis [/color]
Syphilis is an STD caused by the bacteria Treponema pallidum. It's sometimes called the "great imitator" because early symptoms are so similar to other diseases. The disease proceeds through stages -- In primary syphilis, a chancre -- an open sore that's usually painless -- appears, most commonly on the genitals, usually 10-90 days after exposure. In secondary syphilis, a skin rash appears, on any part of the body, including palms of hands & soles of feet. In tertiary syphilis, the disease spreads to internal organs, where it can do serious damage. A pregnant woman can pass the disease on to her child. Having syphilis makes a person more susceptible to HIV. Early diagnosis is important because syphilis is readily treatable with antibiotics.
[color=red]how to find out if you got it[/color]
To find out if you have syphilis the doctor must do a blood test. Syphilis is easily treated with penicillin. However, left untreated, syphilis is a deadly disease, and can kill a person years after infection. The first sign of syphilis is often a sore that doesn't hurt and that goes away even if you don't take any medicine. This sore is called a chancre. It usually appears on the penis, vagina, or rectum. Syphilis is most easily spread when someone has a chancre.
There is usually only one chancre, but sometimes there are more. The chancre is usually round. It often looks like several layers of skin are missing. Women who don't get treated for syphilis can give it to their unborn babies. Often these babies are born dead or have brain damage!
[color=red]These are other signs of syphilis: [/color]
Losing patches of hair
Losing eyebrows
A rash on the body (anywhere on the body)
A rash on the bottom of the feet or the palms of the hands are another symptom of syphilis. You can not get syphilis by touching this rash, unless there are open sores.
Most men and women will go through a period of time when they don't have any signs of syphilis. They don't feel sick, BUT they still have syphilis. This can happen after the chancre has gone away, but before the rash appears. This can also happen after the rash goes away or their hair starts growing back.
Cheers
Tee Vee :cool:
***********,
That's a nasty sore on your dick, bro. Better go see the doctor:).
[b]GENITAL WARTS[/b]
[COLOR=Red]What is it? [/COLOR]
HPV is known by many names including venereal, anogenital, or genital warts, and condylomata acuminata. It is a viral infection of skin causing the growth of skin-colored, cauliflower-like masses of various sizes and shapes as shown by the arrows in this picture. (A tampon string is in place as she was menstruating at the time this photo was taken.) It has become very common over the last two decades infecting anywhere from 3% to 28% of the population.
[COLOR=Red]Common Signs & Symptoms [/COLOR]
Several weeks to months after being exposed to a sexual partner with HPV, these painless growths occur on damp or moist surfaces in either sex. Common locations include those pictured as well as around the anus. They often begin as tiny red spots and can grow quickly into cauliflower-like masses. Infection of a woman's cervix with certain strains of this virus can lead to cervical cancer. It is crucial, therefore, for all women who have this disease to have regular pap smears. (Actually, all women who are sexually active need to have regular pap smears to look for cervical problems.)
[COLOR=Red] How's it Diagnosed? [/COLOR]
Diagnosis is made when a physician sees the classic-shaped growths. If there is any question, a sample of the abnormal tissue (biopsy) can be taken and sent to the lab for microscopic analysis. Cervical HPV is diagnosed by taking a small sample of cervical cells with a popsicle-like stick (pap smear) and preparing this specimen on a slide for microscopic analysis.
[COLOR=Red]How's it Treated? [/COLOR]
Like most viral infections, there is no cure for Human Papillomavirus. Treatment consists of destroying the infected cells, but it often comes back due to infection of normal-appearing nearby skin. If left untreated, genital warts may go away on their own. One study showed that nearly 1/3 of all patients had spontaneous resolution of the growths.
For those not wanting to wait to see if they disappear on their own (e.g., most people), destruction of the abnormal cells can be done via a number of methods such as freezing the growths with liquid nitrogen, destroying the tissue with laser surgery, using a blistering agent (such as podophyllin - made from rain forest beetles), or burning them off with a potent acid (e.g., trichloracetic acid). A doctor trained in one of these techniques should be seen to prevent damaging the normal surrounding tissue.
A novel approach is to enhance ones own im***e system to fight off the genital warts. One such "im***e-enhancer" is a cream called imiquimod (Aldara). Imiquimod is currently available by a doctor's prescription only, but unlike the other treatments that require a health professional to apply, Aldara is applied by the patient themselves, in the privacy of their own home. The patient puts a small amount of the cream on the warts three times a week. Aldara is for the treatment of visible warts on the genitals and perianal area. It is not for treatment of cervical or intravaginal warts. Cervical or intravaginal warts are usually treated with freezing or by surgically removing the infected area.
[COLOR=Red]How do I avoid Getting It (Prevention)? [/COLOR]
Abstinence, and perhaps correct condom use may prevent transmission of this virus from one person to the next. It is crucial that all infected skin be covered to prevent skin to skin transmission. Since multiple areas of skin touch during intimate encounters, condom use is not terribly effective.
Cheers
Tee Vee :cool:
[B]PUBIC LICE[/B]
[COLOR=Red]What are pubic lice?[/COLOR]
Also called "crabs," pubic lice are parasitic insects found in the genital area of humans. Infection is common and found worldwide.
[COLOR=Red]How did I get pubic lice?[/COLOR]
Pubic lice are usually spread through sexual contact. Rarely, infestation can be spread through contact with an infested person's bed linens, towels, or clothes. A common misunderstanding is that infestation can be spread by sitting on a toilet seat. This isn't likely, since lice cannot live long away from a warm human body. Also, lice do not have feet designed to walk or hold onto smooth surfaces such as toilet seats.
Infection in a young child or teenager may indicate sexual activity or sexual abuse.
[COLOR=Red]Where are pubic lice found?[/COLOR]
Pubic lice are generally found in the genital area on pubic hair; but may occasionally be found on other coarse body hair, such as hair on the legs, armpits, mustache, beard, eyebrows, or eyelashes. Infestations of young children are usually on the eyebrows or eyelashes. Lice found on the head are not pubic lice; they are head lice.
Animals do not get or spread pubic lice.
[COLOR=Red]What are the signs and symptoms of pubic lice?[/COLOR]
Signs and symptoms of pubic lice include
Itching in the genital area
Visible nits (lice eggs) or crawling lice
[COLOR=Red]What do pubic lice look like?[/COLOR]
There are three stages in the life of a pubic louse: the nit, the nymph, and the adult.
Nit: Nits are pubic lice eggs. They are hard to see and are found firmly attached to the hair shaft.
They are about the size of the mark at the end of this arrow . They are oval and usually yellow to white. Nits take about 1 week to hatch.
Nymph: The nit hatches into a baby louse called a nymph. It looks like an adult pubic louse, but it is smaller. Nymphs mature into adults about 7 days after hatching. To live, the nymph must feed on blood.
Adult: The adult pubic louse is about the size of this circle and resembles a miniature crab when viewed through a strong magnifying glass. Pubic lice have six legs, but their two front legs are very large and look like the pincher claws of a crab; this is how they got the nickname "crabs." Pubic lice are tan to grayish-white in color. Females lay nits and are usually larger than males. To live, adult lice must feed on blood. If the louse falls off a person, it dies within 1-2 days.
[COLOR=Red]How is a pubic lice infestation diagnosed?[/COLOR]
A lice infestation is diagnosed by looking closely through pubic hair for nits, nymphs, or adults. It may be difficult to find nymph or adult; here are usually few of them and they can move quickly away from light. If crawling lice are not seen, finding nits confirms that a person is infested and should be treated. If you are unsure about infestation or if treatment is not successful, see a health care provider for a diagnosis.
[COLOR=Red]How is a pubic lice infestation treated?[/COLOR]
A lice-killing shampoo (also called a pediculicide) made of 1% permethrin or pyrethrin is recommended to treat pubic lice. These products are available without a prescription at your local drug store. Medication is generally very effective; apply the medication exactly as directed on the bottle. A prescription medication, called Lindane (1%) is available through your health care provider. Lindane is not recommended for pregnant or nursing women, or for children less than 2 years old.
Malathion* lotion 0.5% (Ovide*) is another prescription medication that is effective against pubic lice.
How to treat pubic lice infestations: (Note: see section below for treatment of eyelashes or eyebrows. The lice medications described in this section should not be used near the eyes.)
Wash the infested area; towel dry.
Thoroughly saturate hair with lice medication. If using permethrin or pyrethrins, leave medication on for 10 minutes; if using Lindane, only leave on for 4 minutes. Thoroughly rinse off medication with water. Dry off with a clean towel.
Following treatment, most nits will still be attached to hair shafts. Nits may be removed with fingernails.
Put on clean underwear and clothing after treatment.
To kill any lice or nits (attached to hairs) that may be left on clothing or bedding, machine-wash those washable items that the infested person used during the 2-3 days before treatment. Use the hot water cycle (130°F). Use the hot dryer cycle for at least 20 minutes.
Dry-clean clothing that is not washable.
Inform any sexual partners that they are at risk for infestation.
Do not have sex until treatment is complete.
Do not have sex with infected partners until partners have been treated and infestation has been cured.
Repeat treatment in 7-10 days if lice are still found.
To treat nits and lice found on eyebrows or eyelashes:
If only a few nits are found, it may be possible to remove live lice and nits with your fingernails or a nit comb.
If additional treatment is needed for pubic lice nits found on the eyelashes, applying an ophthalmic-grade petrolatum ointment (only available by prescription) to the eyelids twice a day for 10 days is effective. Vaseline* is a kind of petrolatum, but is likely to irritate the eyes if applied.
Cheers
Tee Vee:cool:
[b]chancroid[/b]
(kan-kroid) is also known as:
soft chancre
venereal sore
chancroid ( human genital ulcer disease) is an std caused by exposure to:
haemophilus ducreyi (a small gram-negative rod organism) which occurs mainly in developing countries, especially the african, asian and latin american nations.
infection from chancroid related to haemophilus ducreyi is decreasing in many areas but increasing in infections related to herpes simplex virus type-2 (hsv-2).
chancroid is a bacterial disease causing painful, irregularly shaped sores, but is a localized infection which can be treated and cured and has no long-term effects.
over 4,000 cases are reported annually occurring mainly in younger adults, although it can affect any age.
[color=red]chancroid [/color]
the size can vary from 1-2 millimeters to several centimeters but is usually 1-2 centimeters in diameter.
the shape can be:
irregular
oval
round
unlike the chancre of syphilis:
the chancroid ulcer edge is soft
the ulcer changes shape when the edges are squeezed
[color=red]symptoms [/color]
first signs of infection appear from 3-5 days and up to 2 weeks after contact, and usually a tender, raised bump develops where the bacteria entered the body:
inside/outside the vagina or rectum
occasionally on hands, thighs or mouth
on the penis
within 1-4 days the bump transforms into one or more shallow sores which break open and deepen, becoming:
filled with pus
inflamed
painful
ruptured
the next stage may persist for several weeks and may result in:
a painful open sore
purulent base of the ulcer
several lesions merging to form gigantic ulcers
in over half of the untreated cases the chancroid bacteria infects the lymph glands in the groin.
the lymph glands in the groin may
swell, creating a pus-filled bulge, known as a bubo
enlarge until they burst through the skin
drain continuously
remain open
become infected by other bacteria
may be firm or fluctuant
may rupture or ulcerate
the typical chancroid bubo:
appears about 1-2 weeks after the ulcer forms
is unilateral, spherical, and painful
in men
1-4 sores on the penis may develop
buboes appear in about 50% of male patients
the foreskin may swell
the ulcers usually are found in:
the prepuce near the frenulum
coronal sulcus
glans
rectal sores may:
bleed
cause pain when defecating
in women
buboes are uncommon in women
dyspareunia (painful sex)
dysuria (painful urination)
painless sores can develop on the cervix
several sores may develop around the vagina and rectum
vaginal discharge
the ulcers usually are found on the:
cervix
entrance of the vagina, particularly the fourchette
labia majora and minora
peri-anal area
rectal sores may:
bleed
cause pain when defecating
click here to view photos of chancroids
[color=red]transmission [/color]
chancroid is transmitted through the skin by direct sexual contact with an infected individual through
anal sex
oral sex
vaginal sex
the infection is spread to other parts of the body by:
minor abrasions
physical contact
rubbing
scratching
other
an uncircumcised man is more likely to contract the disease than a circumcised man
any sexually active person can be infected with chancroid
if a person does not practice personal hygiene it is easier for the infection to be transmitted
it is more commonly seen in men than in women
risk factors
contact between scraped or broken infected skin increases the likelihood of transmission
ejaculation is not necessary for the infection to be spread
even if using a condom, sores may be present on areas not protected by the latex and can cause infection anywhere they contact receptive tissue
the bacteria are more likely to invade the sexual organs at the point of a pre-existing injury, such as a small cut or scratch
more outbreaks occur in:
drug users
people with other stds
prostitutes and their clients
re-infection can occur from:
minor abrasions
open wounds
[color=blue]the disease is not spread from person to person by casual contact such as:
clothing
door knobs
eating utensils
swimming pools
toilet seats
and[/color]
[color=blue]mothers do not pass it on to babies at birth [/color]
[color=red]diagnosis [/color]
chancroid is usually diagnosed by:
culture or biopsy
gram stain
microscopic examination of a smear sample taken from the patient's sores
although the disease does not enter the bloodstream a blood sample is usually taken to check for the presence of other stds.
[color=red]treatment [/color]
buboes may need to be drained with a needle under local anesthetic.
although treatment with antibiotics can cure the infection, strains are becoming more common that are resistant to:
ampicillin
chloramphenicol
penicillin,
tetracycline
conventional treatment
current treatment involves regular doses for up to two weeks of:
ciprofloxacin
erythromycin
trimethoprin
or a single dose of:
azithromycin
ceftriaxone
drug information
azithromycin (zithromax) is used to treat:
chlamydial and gonorrheal infections of the genital tract
mild to moderately severe infections caused by susceptible strains of microorganisms
contraindications
concurrent pimozide treatment (sudden death may occur)
hepatic impairment
hypersensitivity
interactions with other substances
decreased effects if taking:
aluminum antacids
magnesium antacids
increased toxicity of:
digoxin
theophylline
warfarin
if taking cyclosporine there is an increased risk of:
nephrotoxicity
neurotoxicity
side effects
bacterial or fungal overgrowth with prolonged use
cholestatic jaundice
may increase hepatic enzymes
site reactions can occur with iv route
caution
care should be used when dealing with patients:
who are debilitated
who are geriatric
who are hospitalized
with pneumonia
during pregnancy
it has not been established if it is safe for pregnant and lactating women
ceftriaxone (rocephin) is used to:
stop bacterial growth by binding to one or more penicillin-binding proteins
contraindications
erythromycin is used to treat patients allergic to:
cephalosporines
quinolones
contraindications
in liver disease
discontinue if the following occurs:
abdominal colic
fever
malaise
nausea
vomiting
ciprofloxacin (cipro) is a bactericidal antibiotic that is used to inhibit:
hypersensitivity
should not be used for children and adolescents under 18
interactions with other substances
[color=red]dietary recommendations [/color]
include:
essential fatty acids, such as olive oil, nuts
fish and poultry
flax seed, (linseed) oil
fresh fruits and vegetables
organic foods where possible
plenty of fresh water ( drink as much as possible)
whole grains
avoid:
alcohol
carbonated beverages
dairy products
fruit juice
refined white flour, such as pasta, bread, desserts
sugar
nutritional supplements
proteolytic enzymes:
bromelain 400mg
wobenzyme n five tablets three to four times a day away from meals
and
vitamin c 1,000 mg three times a day with meals
zinc 30 mg daily
herbal treatment
goldenseal (hydrastis canadensis), strong infusion or poultice applied locally to sores
goldenseal (hydrastis)/vitamin a suppository
other treatments
warm sitz baths with several drops tea tree oil (melaleuca alternifolia) added
vaginal douche using one or both of the following herbs which have potent anti-microbial properties:
goldenseal (hydrastis canadensis)
oregon grape root (mahonia aqjuifolium
[color=red]prevention [/color]
risk factors
douching or [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord112][CodeWord112][/url] after sex does not prevent stds
exposure of skin and mucus membranes with a high risk partner
if there are any signs or symptoms of chancroid abstain from sex until the infection is cured
help factors
carefully washing the genitals with antibacterial soap immediately after sex
limit one's sexual relationship to a single, uninfected partner
practice safe sex
use latex condoms or gloves put on before sex and disposed of responsibly immediately after sexual contact
other precautions
[color=red]prognosis [/color]
chancroid does not seem to have any adverse effects on pregnancy or the fetus
[color=red]complications[/color]
balanoposthitis, inflammation and partial loss of tissue, particularly of the glans, penis and prepuce, may occur
buboes may rupture taking months to heal completely
fistulous tracts, abnormal tube-like passages within the body tissues, may form
phimosis, tightness of the foreskin
scarring from extensive infection or from burst buboes may occur
untreated chancroid often results in ulcers occurring on the genitals, which can persist for weeks or months
risk factors
people with open chancroid sores are especially vulnerable to other stds
re-infection can occur immediately after cure as the body does not build up any natural resistance
in less than 10% of cases sores may return and these may be caused by:
it has been found that the genital ulcers of chancroid have:
been associated with the sexual transmission of the hiv virus
occurred as outbreaks in populations with a high incidence of hiv-1 infection.
cheers
tee vee :cool:
[b]chlamydia[/b]
chlamydia is actually a group of different infections caused by different strains of the chlamydia bacterium:chlamydia pneumonia causes a type of walking pneumonia
chlamydia psittaci causes a type of pneumonia caused by birds
chlamydia trachomatis causes various sexually transmitted diseases
chlamydia trachomatis is currently one of the most common and widespread bacterial stds in the united states. it is estimated that more than 4 million people are infected each year. rates of chlamydia in the united states are highest in the west and midwest, with missouri having above average numbers.
[color=red]symptoms[/color]
asymptomatic
it is called asymptomatic if there are no symptoms
in the beginning chlamydia may not make you feel anything so you may not even know you have it
it can just come and go
those who do notice that they have this infection will have certain symptoms for weeks or months, depending on the severity of the infection and whether treatment was undertaken early, or not at all. but, as it gets worse, you will begin to experience different symptoms
in pre-puberty girls
vaginal discharge and odor (vaginitis)
in post-puberty girls
discharge (off-white) and odor which comes from the cervix being infected
in women
chlamydia is often silent in women, with up to 90% of women asymptomatic. women can carry the bacteria for months or even years without knowing it. this makes screening very important.
symptoms can start to occur within 3 weeks after getting the infection and include the following:
constant lower abdominal pain
mild, milky or yellow mucus-like vaginal discharge
nausea and fever
pain during urination
pain during sexual intercourse
spotting between periods
chlamydia can also lead to:
cervicitis which is inflammation of the cervix.
5-13% of the women in the u.s. who get chlamydia get cervicitis.
salpingitis which is inflammation of the fallopian tubes
ectopic pregnancy
if a pregnant woman has chlamydia trachomatis the risk of an ectopic pregnancy is much higher. this is where the fetus does not grow in the womb but in the ectopic tubes.
chlamydia can silently linger for months without symptoms and the infection may move inside the body if it is not treated, where it may cause:
epidydimitis in men
pelvic inflammatory disease
pelvic inflammatory disease (pid) causes:
infertility
chronic pain
even death
in men
chlamydia causes something called non-specific urethritis (nsu) which can produce symptoms such as:
burning on urination (non-gonoccocal urethritis (ngu))
groin pain and swelling (epididymitis)
irritation around opening of the penis
mild, sticky, milky or mucus-like discharge from penis
pain when [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord112][CodeWord112][/url]
swollen testes (which if not treated can lead to infertility)
testicular pain
symptoms may seem to "come and go"
in babies
1/4 of babies passing down the infected birth canal will get chlamydia pneumonia
1/2 of all babies born to infected women after delivery through the birth canal will develop chlamydial conjunctivitis (pink eye) a week after birth
in severe cases blindness may occur
the bacteria can be easily passed to the developing child within the uterus
the child may have respiratory diseases for a long time if not treated
other conditions
the infection can occur in the pharynx (throat) from oral-genital contact
the infection can be spread to the eyes causing inflammation of the lining of the eye (pink eye)
in tropical climates, a particular strain of c. trachomatis causes an std called lymphogranuloma venereum (lgv) which can get into the skin through tiny cuts.
after months or years it can spread to other lymph nodes causing:
genital problems
pain
proctitis (inflamed rectum)
skin breakdown (ulceration)
swelling
[color=red]transmission[/color]
the bacteria causing the infection is transmitted by direct person-to-person contact through:
blood
passing it to a baby during birth
semen from the penis
touching eyes when infected
vaginal fluid
risk groups
babies (from infected mothers)
sexually active people, regardless of their sexual preference
sexually active teenagers (about 45%)
[color=red]
diagnosis [/color]
if you have certain symptoms or feel differently to how you normally feel and have been with an infected person, go to a doctor for confirmation.
chlamydial infection can be confused with gonorrhea because the symptoms of both diseases are similar and in some situations they occur together.
laboratory tests
a sample of the patient's genital secretions is tested in a laboratory using one of a wide variety of quick and inexpensive laboratory tests
culture
growing the organism in specialized tissue culture is one of the most definitive tests.
these tests are:
difficult to do
expensive
test results not available for 3-7 days
dna amplification
a process called dna amplification is used to detect the genes of the organisms in genital secretions ([url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url]). this method does not require an invasive sample, pelvic examination or swabbing of the penis
these tests are:
less expensive
more rapid
performed during a routine checkup
slightly less accurate
results available within 24 hours
amplicor chlamydia trachomatis test
recently, a new chlamydia test became available called amplicor chlamydia trachomatis test, which is carried out using:
a sample of a man's [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url]
a swab from a woman's cervix or urethra
results are available within 4 hours and not 3-7 days
[color=red]prevention[/color]
due to lack of symptoms people who are infected with chlamydia may unknowingly infect their sex partners.
if you are sexually active, you can lower your risk by following these guidelines:
abstinence is the only way to be 100% sure of protection from chlamydia and other sexually transmitted diseases
drugs reduce your ability to make sensible decisions, such a:
becoming sexually intimate when drinking alcohol and/or taking drugs
condoms or diaphragms should be used during sexual intercourse:
anal
oral
vaginal
form a monogamous relationship
be tested before you have sex
both partners are faithful
limit your number of sexual partners
risk increases as number of partners increases
persons who have more than one sex partner, especially women under 25, should be tested regularly
regular check-ups for std's
do not wait for symptoms to appear
testing should be part of your regular examination
recommendations
annual screening of all sexually active females under 20 years of age
pregnant women should be tested
women with infection of the cervix should be tested
screening of women over 20 with one or more risk factors for chlamydia:
diaphragm contraception
lack of condom
multiple sex partners
new sex partner
[color=red][treatment[/color]
chlamydia can be in your body for a very long time unless treated with antibiotics. usually this consists of a 7-10 day treatment program.
a number of antibiotics are used to treat chlamydial infections including:
amoxicillin
azithromycin (one-day course)
doxycycline (seven day course) *
erythromycin *
tetracycline (some people are allergic to the drug)
ofloxacin
* able to be used during pregnancy
note
penicillin is not effective against chlamydial infections
the prescribed medication should be taken, even after symptoms disappear, until advised by your health practitioner
all sexual partners of a person with chlamydial infection need to be evaluated and treated to prevent re-infection.
cheers
tee vee :cool:
[b]gonorrhea[/b]
gonorrhea gonococcal infection (clap, drip)
gonorrhea is:
an infection that is spread through sexual contact with another person
caused by a bacterium, neisseria gonorrhoeae
second only to chlamydial infections in the number of reported cases.
the gonorrhea germs are found in the mucous areas of the body:
genital tract
penis
rectum
throat
vagina
in women
the opening (cervix) to the womb (uterus) from the birth canal is the first place of infection
the disease can spread into the womb and fallopian tubes, resulting in pelvic inflammatory disease (pid) which can cause infertility in up to 10% of infected women and tubal (ectopic) pregnancy
risk groups
any person who is sexually active can be infected with gonorrhea
common among younger people, ages 15-30, who have multiple sex partners
increases in gonorrhea have been found among men who have sex with men
occurs more frequently in urban areas than in rural areas.
[color=red]transmission[/color]
gonorrhea is spread
through sexual contact including:
penis to vagina (infection rate for males 30-50%, females 60-90%)
penis to mouth,
penis to rectum
mouth to vagina
from mother to child as the child passes through the birth canal during delivery causing:
eye infections
in children, usually due to sexual abuse it is found in the:
genital tract
mouth
rectum
other risk factors
an infected person can spread the infection to another area of their body by touching the infected area and transferring the excretions
clothing or wash cloths of infected people can spread the infection
[color=red]symptoms [/color]
in men:
creamy or green, pus-like discharge from the penis
painful urination (burning sensation)
testicular pain
in women:
bleeding between periods
creamy or green, pus-like or bloody vaginal discharge
excessive bleeding during menstrual period
irritation of the vulva
lower abdominal pain
painful intercourse
painful urination (burning sensation)
rectal infection
throat infection
rectal infection:
constipation
creamy, pus-like discharge
itching
painful bowel movement with blood in [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord113][CodeWord113][/url]
rectal bleeding
symptoms usually appear 2-7 days after infection in males, but it can sometimes take up to 30 days for symptoms to appear.
often there are no symptoms at all in:
10-15 % of men
80% of women
people with no symptoms are at risk of developing complications from gonorrhea and can unknowingly spread the infection.
from the time of infection gonorrhea can be spread and will continue to be spread until properly treated.
past infection does not make a person im***e to gonorrhea and previous infections with gonorrhea may allow complications to occur more rapidly and increase your risk of getting hiv.
long term complications
in men
epididymitis
an inflammation of the testicles that can cause sterility
in women
abscesses
ectopic pregnancy
a pregnancy outside of the uterus
pelvic inflammatory disease (pid)
an ascending infection that spreads from the vagina and cervix to the uterus and fallopian tubes, which can lead to sterility
perihepatitis
an infection around the liver
sterility
in newborns
gonorrhea can be transmitted to newborns.
[color=red]diagnosis [/color]
many doctors prefer to use more than one test to increase the chance of an accurate diagnosis. there are three laboratory techniques usually used to diagnose gonorrhea:
staining biological samples
staining biological samples directly for the bacterium is carried out by placing on a slide a sample of the discharge from the penis or cervix and staining it with a dye
the doctor can usually give you the test results during the consultation
this test is more accurate for men than women, as only 1 in 2 women with the infection have a positive stain
detection of bacterial genes or nucleic acid (dna) test
detection of bacterial genes or nucleic acid (dna) test is carried out using [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] or cervical swabs to detect the genes of the bacteria
this test is often more accurate than culturing the bacteria
[color=red]treatment [/color]
gonorrhea is treated with penicillin or other antibiotics in pill form or by injection, however, the disease is becoming more and more resistant to many standard medications.
antibiotics that are currently used are:
cefixime
ceftriaxone
ciprofloxacin*
ofloxacin*
tetracycline
* the antibiotics ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin should not be taken if you have gonorrhea and are:
pregnant
younger than 18 years old
gonorrhea and chlamydial infection, another common std, often infect people at the same time
a combination of antibiotics is taken which will treat both diseases, such as:
azithromycin
ceftriaxone
doxycycline
all sexual partners should be tested and treated if infected, whether or not they have symptoms of the infection.
if untreated the gonorrhea infection can spread:
into the reproductive tract
and through the bloodstream infecting:
brain (rarely)
heart valves
joints
the most common result of untreated gonorrhea is pelvic inflammatory disease (pid), a serious infection of the female reproductive organs.
gonococcal pelvic inflammatory disease (pid) often appears immediately after menstruation and causes:
in women
abscesses
perihepatitis, an infection around the liver, as a long-term complication
scar tissue to form in the fallopian tubes
sterilization in females
the embryo to implant in the tube causing a tubal (ectopic) pregnancy, which can result in miscarriage and sometimes death of the mother
the fertilized egg not to pass into the uterus if the tubes are partially scarred
in men
arthritis
epididymitis, an inflammation of the testicles that can cause sterility in the long term
other organ infections
skin problems
swelling of the testicles and penis
approximately 2% of persons with untreated gonorrhea may develop disseminated gonococcal infection (dgi).
symptoms include:
arthritis type pain
fever
skin lesions
cheers
tee vee :cool:
So make sure you have safe sex whether in Thailand or anywhere else you may want to "monger".
If there are any other STD information you want, just let me know and I'll continue.
Cheers
Tee Vee :cool:
Sheesh! I need to book an appointment with the optician! When I first looked I thought it said PUBLIC LICE, and assumed it was another cynical post about the inhabitants of Sukhumvit!
Good posts Tee Vee. But you missed a bit out on Gonorrhoea (my one and only claim to fame with std's): I caught it from an uncovered blowjob. It festers in the mouth, as you state, and has the potency to get down the penile tract and infect the recipient of said blow job. I've heard that this one can be stubborn, but the antibiotic from my local clinic worked a treat for me.
[quote=coma boy]aside from herpes it seems safe enough.
i've eaten a couple of thousand and the only thing i ever catch is some weird coating in the inside of my mouth, which either just goes away after 24 hours or can be banished with listerine.[/quote]
i don't want to flame anybody but don't let anyone tell you oral sex is safe!
i've recently returned from los and about a week after my return i got a sore throat that wouldn't go away. as i had performed oral sex on a girl (non-pro), i was suspicious and decided to go to a clinic to have myself tested. i explained my problem to the doctor and she took a throat swab and [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] sample. the [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] was tested immediately but no bacteria were found. i had to wait a week for the results of the cell culture.
last thursday i got the diagnosis: chlamydia! i was given two 500mg azithromycin pills that i had to take simultaneously.
as i got chlamydia a few years ago from a girl (also thailand!) who had given me a blow job i should have been more careful.
these links might be informative:
[url]http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/news/stds_can_be_transmitted_through_oral_sex_as_well.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/menshealth/facts/infectionoralsex.htm[/url]
Correct indeed my sore throat came from Philippines but the issue is the same. A good forumer also gave the answer which is a throat wash called Peridex - gargle before and it will give 4 hours protection - it is the pink liquid usually found in dentists and according to my friend - who is a dentist and lover of abalone it is very effective.
My fever turned into a real nasty - white throat and unable to swallow for a week until another ent specialist correctly called the problem - another week of serious antibiotics and it has gone but a lesson to all concerned.
It may not be you but if she bbj someone who is not clean then kissing her can also do the trick - her pussy may be clean but her mouth may not and she may not even realise it.
So a nice gargle before going out and going down and you will be much safer in the long run.
from memory my original thread on this one is in Philippines thread
[QUOTE=Lorenz]While fucking with a young (she said 19 yo) Thai girl (professional prostitute) taking her from the back my condom broke.
I realized it just when I came out, so I have been fucking her for about 2 minutes with my glandis in contact with her vagina and sexual fluid.
I immediately washed it carefully with plenty of soap and water, I pissed, and I watched and carefully examinated my penis: no any sign of little scares, or cuts, or wounds or red skin, the skin was normal as usual.
Supposing that the girl is 100% HIV positive.
What do you think is the risk of getting HIV?
What the risk to get other diseases?
Should I use any special cream or medicaments to prevent other diseases?
Thanks for sharing your experiences and knowledge!
Actually I'm quite sure that, as all the skin of my penis was perfectly intact, there is no way HIV could have been transmitted to me, but who knows?[/QUOTE]
Here I am again.
One month is passed after the HIV risk exsposure, yesterday I had my blood test for HIV, was negative.
I wasn't able to find any literature and datas about how many weeks the HIV antiboidies need to come out and to be detected with a HIV test....
who could help me with that?
I'll make again the test in 6 weeks (2,5 months after risk) and in June (6 months after risk) but I would like to know usually when do the HIV antibodies come out!
Thanks!
Lorenz, it's my understanding that there is a window of up to 90 days for HIV, so to be sure you need to have a test 3 months after you accident for a true reading of your status.
Hi Lorenz remember to test for other STD's. For HIV to be save the delay are 3 months, 6 months and to be reaallllly save 12 months. But if you are tested in the USA with the new test you should be ok afther 3 months .... the second test it's to make sure and to see if you were "false negatif" or even "false positiv" this happen some time but it's very rare. Good Luck.
Sun rise
[QUOTE=Lorenz]
I wasn't able to find any literature and datas about how many weeks the HIV antiboidies need to come out and to be detected with a HIV test....
who could help me with that?
I'll make again the test in 6 weeks (2,5 months after risk) and in June (6 months after risk) but I would like to know usually when do the HIV antibodies come out!
[/QUOTE]
Lorenz,
the answer is 3 months. Some might test positive earlier, but 3 months is max.
If you do not develop any antibodies within that period, you never will. You will be safe then.
Good luck
Sorry guys, but I just can't take it !
If all this is about one condom breakage, then you're in the wrong sport. But at least the right forum.
Relax.
Don't the Germans have a saying something like: "worrying about something you can not control only multiplies the misery" ?
Sure, practice safe sex, but don't beat your brains out over an "oops".
FD
Exactly Firedick!
This is a risky game, it's a gamble. Don't play if you're not willing to accept the possible consequences- don't gamble what you can't afford to lose.
"Live by the pussy, die by the pussy".
Dear Fellow,
I heard that HIV symptons include night sweats. please advise if it is true and how you can differentiate the night sweats of HIV from other non-HIV related sickness.
How about some pimple like bumps at the back (shoulder blade) of the body. is this is the so called sores or rushes of HIV?
Thanks in advance
the red bumps could be anything and are "easily" checked
Night sweats are similar to waking up in a heavy sweat (routinely) - but if in LOS, it's sort of hard to tell (at least in a fan room).
the test is cheap - go have it done - cheap peace of mind
Be specially careful with TG's in one of soi6's most popular bars.
At least 1 infected girl working there!
[QUOTE=El Culion]I don't want to flame anybody but DON'T LET ANYONE TELL YOU ORAL SEX IS SAFE!
As I got chlamydia a few years ago from a girl (also Thailand!) who had given me a blow job I should have been more careful.
These links might be informative:
[url]http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/news/stds_can_be_transmitted_through_oral_sex_as_well.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/menshealth/facts/infectionoralsex.htm[/url][/QUOTE]
You can also get Gonorrhoea and syphillys, especially from a woman who swallows. I speak from experience. What's the difference between a vagina and throat to bacteria? However, I have been told by medical experts that HIV doesn't like saliva and getting a BBBJ from a HIV+ individual doesn't represent much of a risk. But who want's to risk it? Now I use condoms for everything. If you have a girl who doesn't like CIM you can usually convience them to "go all the way" with a condom.
The bumps are probably from the heat. However, if you are HIV+ you don't want to spread it around. So just get the damn test! For your own peace of mind and the rest of our safety.
[QUOTE=Wwqfas]Be specially careful with TG's in one of soi6's most popular bars.
At least 1 infected girl working there![/QUOTE]
Don't keep us in suspense, tell us which bar!! In Pattaya or BKK?
[QUOTE=Durianfan]Don't keep us in suspense, tell us which bar!! In Pattaya or BKK?[/QUOTE]BKK, Pattaya, wherever. What difference does it make?
There are infected girls in pretty much every bar.
[QUOTE=Coma Boy]
There are infected girls in pretty much every bar.[/QUOTE]
No, there are not, but there easily could be, which amounts to the same, of course.
Pat!
If you carefully read you'll know the bar.
Here are some links to good condom suppliers. Some of the super thin Japanese condoms are great. Albeit, a little snug for a falong schlong.
Undercovercondoms.com
Condomdepot.com
But it's not unique to Thailand -
"Sexual activity related injuries"
[url]http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11624436/[/url]
If the owner/manager knew about the girl wouldn't they let her go. In reality, it is probably true that more than half the bars have one more girls infected with HIV. If you use a condom for vaginal sex you should be okay. There is very little evidence that HIV has even been transmitted orally.
I would be willing to bet an airline ticket to Pattaya that there is at least one infection at the TS/TV bar on Soi 6.
[QUOTE=Wwqfas]Be specially careful with TG's in one of soi6's most popular bars.
At least 1 infected girl working there![/QUOTE]
WOOO HOO,
As some of you might remember, awhile back I had a broken condom experience with some massage girl.
3 months later I got tested (Oh my god I was already planning my funeral) and it came back Negative.
Im so freaking happy.
Cant wait to get back there and fuck some girls.
Enjoy
[QUOTE=Coma Boy]BKK, Pattaya, wherever. What difference does it make?
There are infected girls in pretty much every bar.[/QUOTE]The unofficial statistic is: 30-50% of Thai BGs are HIV positive!
In my Thai mongering career I had two close calls:
A 'nice' girl I spent 4 days with in Patty, 1995, died of AIDS in 1997.
I tested HIV-negative.
In 2005 I had unprotected intercourse in Phuket and cought the clap (gonorrhea). What a bummer, ruined my holiday. I tested HIV-negative again.
Back in the homeland I had cought the clap from my own wife in 1975 long before HIV was invented (I can't be dissuaded that it's some biological warfare agent that was let loose, either by accident or by design)!
So for me rubbers make a lot of sense now.
Here's what to look for in the BG: skinny, needle marks, nervousness, jumpiness, moodyness, hyperactivity, always with a cold. So the ones who are a bit more volupteous and calm are the safer bets.
Any disease can be spread by exchange of bodily fluids, including by fellatio, cunnilingus and kissing. There's also influenza, herpes, tuberculosis, parasites and other awful stuff to worry about.
But life is full of dangers and the urge to have fun in overwhelming; so chose your contacts carefully.
[QUOTE=Hades]WOOO HOO,
As some of you might remember, awhile back I had a broken condom experience with some massage girl.
3 months later I got tested (Oh my god I was already planning my funeral) and it came back Negative.
I'm so freaking happy.
Can't wait to get back there and fuck some girls.
Enjoy[/QUOTE]Hades,
Advice for everyone follows:
I concur that condoms are known to break especially with extended sex sessions or condom contacts someones finger nails or if girl is using a sponge that causes friction (you might not know if in deep). Lube is essential with condoms to reduce friction and chances of breakage.
Moral of the story is to get high class girls from establishments where mandatory testing is regular is a great idea, and always use a condom.
7 eleven stores have a good range in Sukhumwit and Silom areas.
I use extra thin 54 mm size slightly bulbous shape ones (Durex I think but check the back of packet). Well lubed, it sometimes feels so good that I have to check the condom is still on.
If you gamble, you'll win a dose of HIV soon.
BTW, BBBJ is not completely safe. I suspect I caught Clamydia (just once is more than enough) from a low class girl picked up at the Grace Coffee Shop, years ago this way. Normal sex was protected.
Internet medical reports suggest chance of catching HIV from unprotected oral sex is exceedingly low, but still cases do exist in the world. I think I am more likely to be killed in a motor car accident. Bangkok Songkhran road toll was horrific.
But other VD not quite so difficult to catch this way.
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]Moral of the story is to get high class girls from establishments where mandatory testing is regular is a great idea, and always use a condom.[/QUOTE]It's not as mandatory as such establishments would have you believe.
Also staff are required to show a test-certificate only, and so it's a lot cheaper and easier for them to pay 100 Baht for a fake one than go through the whole testing process.
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]Hades,
Advice for everyone follows:
I concur that condoms are known to break especially with extended sex sessions or condom contacts someones finger nails or if girl is using a sponge that causes friction (you might not know if in deep). Lube is essential with condoms to reduce friction and chances of breakage.
Moral of the story is to get high class girls from establishments where mandatory testing is regular is a great idea, and always use a condom.
7 eleven stores have a good range in Sukhumwit and Silom areas.
I use extra thin 54 mm size slightly bulbous shape ones (Durex I think but check the back of packet). Well lubed, it sometimes feels so good that I have to check the condom is still on.
If you gamble, you'll win a dose of HIV soon.
BTW, BBBJ is not completely safe. I suspect I caught Clamydia (just once is more than enough) from a low class girl picked up at the Grace Coffee Shop, years ago this way. Normal sex was protected.
Internet medical reports suggest chance of catching HIV from unprotected oral sex is exceedingly low, but still cases do exist in the world. I think I am more likely to be killed in a motor car accident. Bangkok Songkhran road toll was horrific.
But other VD not quite so difficult to catch this way.[/QUOTE]I know of a Soi 33 girl who has Genital Herpes and the manager at the establishment she works from had no clue, yet didn't seem surprised when I confronted him with fact.
Buffered gels are coming on the market soon, that is if they can survive the big anti-p4p propaganda. large numbers of men can't use condoms in sea, most are no longer involved with p4p (scared about aids). I"ve been doing surveys in north thailand, and bangkok. Most of the girls think they catch aids the first time they fuck some one with aids and no condom. And most will fuck u with no condom if you tell rhem you don"t have aids. I use a non patentable gel for 6 years, never caught anything. Yes the anti sex club has very effective propaganda but it is a lot easier to die from somthiung else you haven"t been told to worry about. Now I am in phnom penh I am far more concerned about haveing a accident on the street or getting asaulted by several of the towns ya ba addicts, as just happened last week about a block from martini.
[QUOTE=Lee66]Buffered gels are coming on the market soon, that is if they can survive the big anti-p4p propaganda. large numbers of men can't use condoms in sea, most are no longer involved with p4p (scared about aids). I"ve been doing surveys in north thailand, and bangkok. Most of the girls think they catch aids the first time they fuck some one with aids and no condom. And most will fuck u with no condom if you tell rhem you don"t have aids. I use a non patentable gel for 6 years, never caught anything. Yes the anti sex club has very effective propaganda but it is a lot easier to die from somthiung else you haven"t been told to worry about. Now I am in phnom penh I am far more concerned about haveing a accident on the street or getting asaulted by several of the towns ya ba addicts, as just happened last week about a block from martini.[/QUOTE]
Lee66,
good luck to you. You will need it.
Giotto
There is so much nonsense and half knowledge written here in this thread, and in other safe sex threads of the board, besides very few reasonably substantiated reports about the facts. Especially reg. HIV there are still so many open questions, scientists are working on in huge projects.
There is no such unofficial number that 30% - 50 % of the Thai Bar Girls are HIV positive. Where should that number come from, most of those girls would not even admit to work in that business to avoid losing face. There are estimations from wonnabe scientists about infection rates in Pattaya and the BKK p4p areas, but nobody should take this numbers for granted.
Then I read something about CD4 cells (T-cells with CD4 receptors) being located in huge numbers in the urethra, to transport the HIV virus to the lymph nodes! No, those cells can be found in the blood and the lymph fluid. To get into contact with the CD4 cells the HIV virus has still to pass through the skin membrane into the blood/lymph system, and it is still unclear up to today under which circumstance this definitely happens. There are theories that additionally funguses/other STDs are involved in that process.
What information should we use to make up our minds about the risks we take?
There are some country related numbers regarding the AIDS infection rates of the populations, published by the WHO and the CDC. That gives us a rough idea in which countries it might be more dangerous to play the p4p game.
Then there are some facts scientists know today:
- the HIV virus either enters into the body via injections directly into the blood (shared needles, drugs) or via the mucous membrane (and there is a lot of that skin type located on the primary sexual organs of men and women). There are no proven cases that a transfer had taken place via a normal skin contact (hands, body).
- if there are small lesions, cuts, sores on your primary sexual organs the risk to get infected is higher ( I would say MUCH higher). Two reasons for that: Lesions can bleed, and blood is a highly infectious fluid. The other way around lesions are an easier entry point for the virus.
- the HIV virus is NOT extremely infectious itself, some other viruses like the hepatitis viruses are up to 100 times more infectious (that means easier to transfer)
- women get much easier infected with the virus than men (during unprotected sex). The reasons mentioned as explanation for that phenomenon are the sperm staying longer time within the vagina than vaginal fluid stays on the penis, and the monthly period of the woman (open wound).
To come to a conclusion should be easy now for all of us:
- the risk to get infected is always there during unprotected intercourse
- the risk of getting infected is potentially higher for those who prefer HARD SEX or ANAL intercourse, due to the fact, that skin lesions can occur caused by those techniques. The intestine of the rectum is naturally not well prepared for sexual intercourse.
- the risk of getting infected is potentially higher if the intercourse is performed with insufficient lubrication (the woman doesn’t get wet enough, no gel is used, special techniques without natural lubrication).
- the risk of getting infected is LOWER if sufficient gel is used, but THERE IS STILL A RISK!!!
- the risk of getting infected is higher the higher the concentration of the virus in the body fluid is which the mucous membrane is exposed to. This concentration tends to be highest in the blood, followed by vaginal fluids and sperm. It is very low (nearly not existing) in the saliva.
- the risk of getting infected via oral sex exists because of lesions in the mouth caused be teeth brushing, meals or smaller skin infections. That risk is low, but it exists, too, in both directions! Same reason metioned above.
Conclusion:
There is only ONE WAY of protecting ourselves from getting infected: Using a condom as a barrier between our mucous membrane and the fluid of our sexual partner, sufficiently lubricated. Gels used without condom may lower the risk, but there is still a mentionable risk left.
Even with using a condom there remains a small risk (breaking condoms, wrong usage after exposure to body fluids).
Using only a gel is like playing Russian roulette.
Giotto
[QUOTE=Giotto]Conclusion:
There is only ONE WAY of protecting ourselves from getting infected: Using a condom as a barrier between our mucous membrane and the fluid of our sexual partner, sufficiently lubricated. Gels used without condom may lower the risk, but there is still a mentionable risk left.
Even with using a condom there remains a small risk (breaking condoms, wrong usage after exposure to body fluids).
Using only a gel is like playing Russian roulette.
Giotto[/QUOTE]Well, I believe there is one other way: Find the love of your life, see a medical doctor to check for STD, and stay loyal to the love of your life. IMHO, this is of course more safe than having many different partners from various backgrounds highly exposed to STD. But then again we have to stop mongering :-(.
Happy hunting,
HF
[QUOTE=Giotto]Then there are some facts scientists know today:
- ...
[/QUOTE]
Actually, they do not know that much. In their overwhelming majority they strongly believe that ... etc. That is all.
Pretty much everything about HIV/AIDS is much less hard factual science than what people are led to believe.
Nonetheless, one should not need to be concerned by HIV/AIDS to be persuaded to stick to safer sex practices. There is a lot of very nasty things one can catch, especially when engaging into unprotected sexual intercourse with a third-world underprivileged undereducated and overused sex worker.
[QUOTE=Seydlitz]Nonetheless, one should not need to be concerned by HIV/AIDS to be persuaded to stick to safer sex practices. There is a lot of very nasty things one can catch, especially when engaging into unprotected sexual intercourse with a third-world underprivileged undereducated and overused sex worker.[/QUOTE]
Absolutely correct. It should be a very easy decision for all of us to always play safe.
Giotto
Yes condoms offer good protection, but if you are one of the many men that are fucking, and refusing to use condoms, then at least you can get circumcised, look for herpes, sores, etc, on your member befor fucking. And if you can get abuffered gel then even better. Then there is this new 3 drug combination may actually prevent aids just by taking this daily.
[QUOTE=Lee66]Yes condoms offer good protection, but if you are one of the many men that are fucking, and refusing to use condoms, then at least you can get circumcised, look for herpes, sores, etc, on your member befor fucking. And if you can get abuffered gel then even better. Then there is this new 3 drug combination may actually prevent aids just by taking this daily.[/QUOTE]
Lee66,
[b][COLOR=RED]DAMNED![/COLOR][/b]
If you believe that there is a drug combination which prevents you of ALL STDs including HIV when going bareback then this is up to you! But you will find NO medic in the world who backs this theory.
And - YOU can infect your partner, too! And afterwards your partner can infect somebody else...and so on, that's the way the pandemic develops.
Did you ever think about what impact this information can have on others, reading that on a forum which purpose is to find women for sex?
And please - don't start this fucking stupid "circumcised" discussion now. That is nonsense pure, too! Hell, my blood pressure, I get sick if I read something like that.
Lee66, Switch on you brain, please!
Giotto
This whole "Safe Sex in Thailand" thread is fucking stupid.
Instead should be a large banner with the words:
Wear a fucking condom!
giotto, MAY means maybe, not WILL. this 3 drug combination(for hiv prevention) is in phase 3, has worked on monkeys, gilead the manufactor has distanced its self from this product because to many people are buying and using it as if it works, I would think at least for a while it is better then nothing, most likely the virus will become immune to it as well. From an academic point of view, this board is not the best place for discusing this sort of thing . (to many gullable people making false assumptions).
[QUOTE=Coma Boy]
Wear a fucking condom![/QUOTE]
I think there is a pun there somewhere, but I cant think of it.
[QUOTE=Coma Boy]This whole "Safe Sex in Thailand" thread is fucking stupid.
Instead should be a large banner with the words:
Wear a fucking condom![/QUOTE]
Defiantly, Coma Boy!
Oh, did you hear about the new drug that's coming out next month? It prevents all diseases, not only STDs, plus it has a side effect that works like a Viagra. Oh, and I almost forgot to mention: 40 out of 50 men who took it in the test group, have increased their earnings by 34% (some in the stock market, and some by getting a raise)!
Condoms Cancer Causing.
Safe sex proves yet again not to be that safe. - The Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Institute located in Stuttgart, Germany, just released information on research into condoms and found that 91% of the condoms they tested were high in a carcinogen.
LifeSiteNews.com is reporting on this carcinogen found in the majority of condoms:
Study scientists, who conducted the research at The Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Institute in Stuttgart, Germany, said "N-Nitrosamine is one of the most carcinogenic substances," as reported by the Reuters news service.
[QUOTE=Lee66]Condoms Cancer Causing.
Safe sex proves yet again not to be that safe. - The Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Institute located in Stuttgart, Germany, just released information on research into condoms and found that 91% of the condoms they tested were high in a carcinogen.
LifeSiteNews.com is reporting on this carcinogen found in the majority of condoms:
Study scientists, who conducted the research at The Chemical and Veterinary Investigation Institute in Stuttgart, Germany, said "N-Nitrosamine is one of the most carcinogenic substances," as reported by the Reuters news service.[/QUOTE]
I'm not a chemical engineer but aren't petroleum distillates carcinogenic? Since condoms are made from a derivitive of petroleum I guess they are right.
If you change the oil in your car and get oil on your hands, you wash your hands with soap and water. The oil being carcinogenic doesn't mean you won't change your oil again does it?
This is a bad pun isn't it? condoms .......change your oil........
nocbj4me
NoCBJ4me,
as far as I know the major part of condoms that are sold aren't made from a derivitive of petroleum, they are made of rubber latex, which is "enriched" with a few other ingredients. All in all a natural product. Only a few are made of Polyurethane.
[url]http://www.avert.org/usecond.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.infoforhealth.org/pr/j44/j44chap11_c.shtml[/url]
[url]http://www.fda.gov/oashi/aids/condom.html[/url]
[QUOTE=The Traveler]....as far as I know the major part of condoms that are sold aren't made from a derivitive of petroleum, they are made of rubber latex, which is "enriched" with a few other ingredients. All in all a natural product. Only a few are made of Polyurethane.....[/QUOTE]Indeed most 'rubbers' are made out of rubber, i e latex, harvested from rubber trees (BTW: a big cash crop in LOS). Some people are allergic to latex and for them there are condoms made from a plastic material. Then there are the original 'condoms' made from lambs' guts, used since ancient Roman times. Supposed to feel better but kinda gross and very expensive.
In LOS good condoms are hard to find. Most of them are too small and low quality, made in China or Korea. So bring a good supply of your favorite brand and a few more to trade and give away. Get the kind with a spermicidal lubricant, which will kill bacteria and viri too.
I ran out of condoms once in Phuket and did BB. Sure enough, I cought the clap! No HIV, thank goodness.
Cancer by condom? I used rubbers since puberty as they were easily available from vending machines in the streets of Germany. My dick has not rotted away yet. However a lot of friends and relatives in my age group died of acohol and nicotin related afflictions already, from accidents too.
Actually my doctor says mongering keeps me young and healthy. Happy too.
Has anyone actually ever come across a CBJ?
If so where? And why? Doesn't it defeat the whole point?
[QUOTE=The Traveler]NoCBJ4me,
as far as I know the major part of condoms that are sold aren't made from a derivitive of petroleum, they are made of rubber latex, which is "enriched" with a few other ingredients. All in all a natural product. Only a few are made of Polyurethane.
[url]http://www.avert.org/usecond.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.infoforhealth.org/pr/j44/j44chap11_c.shtml[/url]
[url]http://www.fda.gov/oashi/aids/condom.html[/url][/QUOTE]
Thanks Trav,
I guess I was thinking about the ultra thin condoms made of polyurethane. I stand corrected and I learned a bit about latex!
nocbj4me
[QUOTE=Coma Boy]Has anyone actually ever come across a CBJ?
If so where? And why? Doesn't it defeat the whole point?[/QUOTE]
In my experience it is very uncommon. I only got a few in the last 15 years, always at MPs. Last time was at Poseidon. A very cute light-skinned darling skillfully put the cover using her mouth.
She was very good at it but the feeling was weird, not quite as it is supposed to be. So I rushed things to go to FS as I was afraid of losing my concentration :)
I hate condoms!
[QUOTE=Fkkguide]In LOS good condoms are hard to find. Most of them are too small and low quality, made in China or Korea. So bring a good supply of your favorite brand and a few more to trade and give away. Get the kind with a spermicidal lubricant, which will kill bacteria and viri too.
[/QUOTE]
Fkkguide,
I dare to differ. You can buy Durex size 45 (for Japanese ?), 52 and 54 almost everywhere, at least at any 7/11. That should fit most guys They are reliable, a bit tight but I like them that way, gives a better feeling especially if you use some additional lube "inside".
But I agree that you should avoid the Thai brands. Had to use them twice, one broke and the other one didn't fit. I just couldn't put it on even though a condom should be very elastic. Maybe because I was too worried that it might break again and it was so tight that it pinched off any blood.
AR,
I know a lot about smegma, but by this pic it proves that he is on the verge of being a smegma him self or may be one already.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Fkkguide,
I dare to differ. You can buy Durex size 45 (for Japanese ?), 52 and 54 .....[/QUOTE]OK, so things have improved a bit, but my favorite brand happens to be Lifestyles Ribbed in pink. Doubt 7/11 in Phuket has THEM.
I bet all condoms are cheaper at Walmart's than in LOS. Can get a dozen for US$1.06 in CA.
Speaking of lube: don't use Vaseline or other petroleum products (f i baby oil) . It dissolves latex! KY only.
Astroglide is the way to go!
nocbj4me
I've been to Thailand a few times, on my last trip, my condoms and I missed each other, thanks to a baggage issue at the airport. I was only without for a couple of days but suffered severe separation anxiety. So, I ventured out to find some replacements. I went to a pharmacy, to a 7-11 and a grocery store looking for something familiar. For some reason I hate the feeling of shopping for condoms as little old ladies and children eye me suspiciously with that tisk-tisk look on their faces. They know why we're here anyway. It's kinda hard to find what your looking for when it's all written in Thai. I'm not huge but I wanted something that wasn't tight or too short. After rumaging through the stock pile, an employee came over and handed me some type of Durex brand. It had the size written somewhere but not in the same numbers that were inscribed on my tape measure at home. That was a joke, no flaming please. I bought those and another colored box for good measure, no pun intended. Well, the length was ok, but I've never gotten to fully roll down a condom all the way before, aahhh, another first, thanks Thailand. However, the fit was tight, not choking me off, turning purple tight, but not comfortable. They also seemed a stronger, thicker material than I was accustomed to. Needless to say, I was happy to have my suitcase and all that it contained, returned to me. Maybe there's a reason they call them Lifestyles. Moral of the story is some things you can pick up along the way, this just isn't one of them. Take them with you, they make good traveling partners, they're there when you need them, they help keep you safe and perfectly happy sleeping on your floor.
[QUOTE=Fkkguide]OK, so things have improved a bit, but my favorite brand happens to be Lifestyles Ribbed in pink. Doubt 7/11 in Phuket has THEM.
I bet all condoms are cheaper at Walmart's than in LOS. Can get a dozen for US$1.06 in CA.
Speaking of lube: don't use Vaseline or other petroleum products (f i baby oil) . It dissolves latex! KY only.[/QUOTE]
Fkkguide,
you are right, you won't find your favourite at a 7/11, only Durex and a few Thai brands. A package (3 condoms) will set you back approx. 50 baht, therefore Walmart is indeed very cheap.
Goodfeller,
the fact that you obviously got the wrong size and the wrong "model" doesn't mean that all condoms available in LOS won't fit your needs.
I used to bring my own but since 7/11 provides all necessary ingredients for a nice night - sometimes including a girl :) - I just buy them there. At the very first time I just bought a package of each "model" to find out which would be best for me. Went to a supermarket which provided a huge variety of Durex and another European brand. So I ended up with around a dozen packages at the cashier. Nobody cared or waved me a smile, just as I would have bought candy instead of condoms. So I guess you are just a bit too shy.
Don't worry, guess most people don't have negative thoughts about it, the opposite should be true. It's a clear sign that you protect yourself and your partner. Doesn't mean you are fucking around. Don't forget, some girls are allergic to contraceptives so condoms are the way to go.
Traveler,
Perhaps there are more options of "style" I could have chosen.I guess my post was directed more towards the newcomber who may not desire to go through the process of discovery purchasing a multitude of condoms. I tried it and wasn't satisfied with what I found. I still think and suggest to anyone going for their first time to bring their own. No arguement needed, just my suggestion.
As for shyness, I'd say it's more a respect issue. Being that I was in the Nana area, I didn't want to come across as another ugly American who was there for one thing only, especially with children and older non-working women around. We're getting a bad reputation as it is and I wouldn't want to be that guy buying 10 boxes of condoms and a bottle of K-Y in front of Thailand's society. I'd rather bring my own for comfort on a variety of levels. Once again, just my opinion. Peace.
[QUOTE=NoCBJ4me]Astroglide is the way to go! [/QUOTE]
ID Millenium, I'd say.
It is silicon-based, and thus even works in the water. In fact, it makes bathroom tiles rather slippery:) On the plus side, it does not dry as water-based lubes tend to do, and it is not sticky. Really worth a try.
Cherry flavored. Courtesy counts.
Hope someone out there is a medical expert. If one is on medication for high blood pressure, is it ok to take vitamin V. What are the consequences if any?
Thanks.
[QUOTE=Duniawala]Hope someone out there is a medical expert. If one is on medication for high blood pressure, is it ok to take vitamin V. What are the consequences if any?
Thanks.[/QUOTE]
Duniawala,
careful! Vit. V is definitely contra-indicated to some blood pressure treatments. Vit. V. effect is basically a contraction of the small veins, which hinders/slows down the blood to flow back to the heart. For that your erection stays longer, but the same effect takes place in your heart!
It increases the blood pressure slightly. Everybody on high pressure treatment should talk to his doctor about the risks.
Giotto
hi brothers,
what about bbbj?
has anybody information on infection rate with girls from bj bars such as [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord900][CodeWord900][/url] or star of love (patpong 2)?
are they under medical check?
which one of you got std after a bj bar visit?
i feel that these girls must be perfect with their service.
thanks for response.
fv.
I got an e-mail from a friend today. He said he was sick for weeks already back home in Netherlands. He said he contracted hepatitis B from Thailand. He believed he got it from bbbj when he was here in thailand for pat 4 months and received over 30 bbbj by over 30 different girls.
I wonder if any of the members have contracted hepatitis B or possibly other forms like A or C from bbbj in Thailand?? Tried to google search more info on this, but cannot find the rates or probability for contracting this from bbbj.
Any more infos on this??
[QUOTE=RCA Knight]I got an e-mail from a friend today. He said he was sick for weeks already back home in Netherlands. He said he contracted hepatitis B from Thailand. He believed he got it from bbbj when he was here in thailand for pat 4 months and received over 30 bbbj by over 30 different girls.
I wonder if any of the members have contracted hepatitis B or possibly other forms like A or C from bbbj in Thailand?? Tried to google search more info on this, but cannot find the rates or probability for contracting this from bbbj.
Any more infos on this??[/QUOTE]
Bro RCA,
Hep B is mostly contracted thru blood and fecal contamination (unwash food raw seafood etc). Its not easily (although not impossible) contracted via saliva(mouth). More likely senario is your friend got it with unsanitary food . ex: someone goes to bathroom, wipes their ass , dont clean hands then handles the food.
Or another senario; some Thai gals does BBJ on some bro that just did anal on some infected thai gal, dont rinse mouth and goes down on your friend--I guess this could happen.
PT
Oral sex is not safe sex.You can get a bacterial infection of chlamydia, syphilis or gonorrhea in your mouth and/or throat, and in some rarer occasions, can develop genital warts in the mouth. Herpes is commonly passed between genitals and the mouth. HIV and Hepatiti B can be passed through cuts in the mouth or small abrasions. It's very diffucult to say a exact % but even if the risk is very very small and for some only theoritical (means possible but not proven) this could happen. But like PT saided You can get Hepatiti B in other way so it's difficult to say that oral sex was the way he got it. By the way there is a vaccine for Hepatit B so why not to get it before a trip in Asia or Africa.
Sun rise
[QUOTE=RCA Knight]I got an e-mail from a friend today. He said he was sick for weeks already back home in Netherlands. He said he contracted hepatitis B from Thailand. He believed he got it from bbbj when he was here in thailand for pat 4 months and received over 30 bbbj by over 30 different girls.
I wonder if any of the members have contracted hepatitis B or possibly other forms like A or C from bbbj in Thailand?? Tried to google search more info on this, but cannot find the rates or probability for contracting this from bbbj.
Any more infos on this??[/QUOTE]
Easiest thing is to have a Hepatitis B shot from your Doctor. Provides total immunity, costs little and gives great peace of mind
I chatted with my friend who contracted hepatitis B from Thailand on the MSN this morning. He told me he most likely contracted it from oral sex. Maybe not from BBBJ but from ass rimming.
He said he probably rimmed all his 30 plus *****s who gave him BBBJ when at 69 position. He said he rimmed some of them so deep almost sticking his tongue down the anal intestines. He probably ate some shits from some infected Thai girls. He said he won't do it again. Leanred his tough lesson. He is recovering but sick with fever, diarrhrea, fatigue, headache for many days.
Got lots of medicine from hospital and his old mama is taking care of him. He has to blame it on the dirty foods in Thailand to his mama.
So anal rimming actually has a risk of hepatitis if you accidentally eat some girls' juicey shits. I think I will go get a vaccine and tell all my friends better to get a vaccine before start any actions in Thailand.
Knight,
Let's hope for him that his mommy don't know that only Hep A is contracted from water and food...
B & C are bodyjuice related.
BTW Did you tell him he's a fool? Hep B and livercancer are related...
Wont be kissing those Akane girls next time Im in town.
Again have fun but remember when you do DATY ass rimming and when the gril give you a uncover BJ you can get HIV and Herpes and there is no cure for this. It's true for HIV we don't know the exact % of getting it this way but there is one. And yes 95 % of the people that get Hepatitis B will be ok but like Freeler said many of them will have liver cancer.
Sun Rise
Anal rimming! ewwww....... grossing me out.
Always get Hep shots, if you were born and brought up in the West. We poor folks from 3rd world (sorry, developing) countries have been exposed to alsmost everything so chances are much less. However, even then the shots are a good idea. If you get Hep B and don't catch it in the beginning, you can almost certainly say goodbye to your loved ones as you get liver cancer, which is almost non treatable once in advanced stages.
[quote=flyingvisitor]hi brothers,
what about bbbj?
has anybody information on infection rate with girls from bj bars such as [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord900][CodeWord900][/url] or star of love (patpong 2)?[/quote]i'm also quite curious about this. i hope to be dropping by [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord900][CodeWord900][/url] in a few days time and i'd hate to get a souvenir.
also, i've been looking up info on the web and this popped up once or twice - [url]http://www.vpul.upenn.edu/ohe/library/sexhealth/sti/riskchart.htm[/url] the thing i noticed most was, except for herpes, you aren't at any risk for daty? ...really? can anyone offer any experiences/opinions to confirm or deny that?
[QUOTE=RCA Knight]I chatted with my friend who contracted hepatitis B from Thailand on the MSN this morning. He told me he most likely contracted it from oral sex. Maybe not from BBBJ but from ass rimming.
Yes Bro RCA,
this is the most likely way your friend got sick, as I stated in my previous post, majority of Hep B infections are due to contaminations via fecal matters. Mostly thru unsanitary handling of food and raw (uncooked) food, but this is the 1st time I've ever heard of getting it thru eating someones ass. Your friend should submit his story to the Medical Journals.
Down side for your friend is that Hep B is incurable and alot of people suffer from liver problems( jaundice etc) in the future (15-20 years later), it is not just a liver cancer problem.
PT
[QUOTE=Phantomtiger2]Yes Bro RCA,
This is the most likely way your friend got sick, as I stated in my previous post, majority of Hep B infections are due to contaminations via fecal matters. Mostly thru unsanitary handling of food and raw (uncooked) food, but this is the 1st time I've ever heard of getting it thru eating someones ass. Your friend should submit his story to the Medical Journals.[/QUOTE]Don't bother submitting it to medical journals - its pretty obvious that fecal matter and as holes go together.
i did a extensive reserach on this subject. i found out that thailand and other poor southeast asian countries like vietnam, cambodia, myanmar, along with china ect have the highest rates of hepatitis of all kinds in the entire world. and the thai *****s are probably the highest infected groups because of their daily exposure to sex and exposure to all types of body fluids every single day.
so when you have oral sex on a thai girl once in a long while, the chance of getting this is small. but for lots of us long time mongers who have sex including oral sex on thai *****s on daily basis, then the chance of getting hepatitis either a or b is really really high.
i read many articles that when we give oral sex to girls, we are actually unconsciously taking in small amounts of:
1)vaginal fluids
2)annal fluids
3)blood traces from vagina
4)blood traces from anus
5)traces of [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord113][CodeWord113][/url]
and all these elements are enough to cause either hepatitis a or more serious b type which may be very dangerous later on in life.
so after hearing my friend's bad fortune, i have decided to stop giving oral sex to thai girls. and maybe all of us long time mongers in thailand should think twice before you move your head down the valley. because if we do it time after time, our fortune will run out one of these days.
vaccine can help and are available in most hospitals. you need to get 3 vaccines in a duration of 6 months for type b for it to work.
hope this can help to warn all the long timers in thailand to be cautious from now on.
Thanks for the Info its a good thing that I got all my shots last year LOL. But I don't eat out when I'm away from home if you know what i mean LOL.
[QUOTE=Genius]Don't bother submitting it to medical journals - its pretty obvious that fecal matter and as holes go together.[/QUOTE]
dont worry bro, just meant it as a joke to lighten everyones mood .
peace
PT
[quote=marcostraight]that's why you should have taken a double treatment for both clamydia and gonorrhea anyway. like coma said the big problem of clamydia is that sometime is asymptomatic .in case you don't have symptoms the only way to find out if you get clamydia is the urethral swab test and a blood test.despite clamydia is not a virus it produces antibodies (igg,igm).for the first time vd's catcher (not my case) calmydia will show itself with symptoms like light swab (in the morning) , hitching sensation in the urethra and burning when [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord111][CodeWord111][/url].best antibiotics for killing clamydia belong to macrolides family:
erythromycin,azythromycin,iosamycin,roxithromicin.....commercial brand name : zythromax,erythrocyn,iosalide,rulid,etc....
dosage : 600 mg. on empty stomach every 6 hours for 2 weeks and you will kill clamydia straight away !! i know it very well, trust me.[/quote] i have been away from these forums for a while. i have symptoms and have been living with it. i gave up.
[QUOTE=Buzz00]I posted a report with photo for those that are latex intolerant or just don't like rubber.
Cheers[/QUOTE]Where did you post it?
[quote=***********][b]gonorrhea[/b]
gonorrhea gonococcal infection (clap, drip)
gonorrhea is:
an infection that is spread through sexual contact with another person
caused by a bacterium, neisseria gonorrhoeae
second only to chlamydial infections in the number of reported cases.
the gonorrhea germs are found in the mucous areas of the body:
genital tract
penis
rectum
throat
vagina
in women
the opening (cervix) to the womb (uterus) from the birth canal is the first place of infection
the disease can spread into the womb and fallopian tubes, resulting in pelvic inflammatory disease (pid) which can cause infertility in up to 10% of infected women and tubal (ectopic) pregnancy
risk groups
any person who is sexually active can be infected with gonorrhea
common among younger people, ages 15-30, who have multiple sex partners
increases in gonorrhea have been found among men who have sex with men
occurs more frequently in urban areas than in rural areas.
[color=red]transmission[/color]
gonorrhea is spread
through sexual contact including:
penis to vagina (infection rate for males 30-50%, females 60-90%)
penis to mouth,
penis to rectum
mouth to vagina
from mother to child as the child passes through the birth canal during delivery causing:
eye infections
in children, usually due to sexual abuse it is found in the:
genital tract
mouth
rectum
other risk factors
an infected person can spread the infection to another area of their body by touching the infected area and transferring the excretions
clothing or wash cloths of infected people can spread the infection
[color=red]symptoms [/color]
in men:
creamy or green, pus-like discharge from the penis
painful urination (burning sensation)
testicular pain
in women:
bleeding between periods
creamy or green, pus-like or bloody vaginal discharge
excessive bleeding during menstrual period
irritation of the vulva
lower abdominal pain
painful intercourse
painful urination (burning sensation)
rectal infection
throat infection
rectal infection:
constipation
creamy, pus-like discharge
itching
painful bowel movement with blood in [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord113][CodeWord113][/url]
rectal bleeding
symptoms usually appear 2-7 days after infection in males, but it can sometimes take up to 30 days for symptoms to appear.
often there are no symptoms at all in:
10-15 % of men
80% of women
people with no symptoms are at risk of developing complications from gonorrhea and can unknowingly spread the infection.
from the time of infection gonorrhea can be spread and will continue to be spread until properly treated.
past infection does not make a person im***e to gonorrhea and previous infections with gonorrhea may allow complications to occur more rapidly and increase your risk of getting hiv.
long term complications
in men
epididymitis
an inflammation of the testicles that can cause sterility
in women
abscesses
ectopic pregnancy
a pregnancy outside of the uterus
pelvic inflammatory disease (pid)
an ascending infection that spreads from the vagina and cervix to the uterus and fallopian tubes, which can lead to sterility
perihepatitis
an infection around the liver
sterility
in newborns
gonorrhea can be transmitted to newborns.
[color=red]diagnosis [/color]
many doctors prefer to use more than one test to increase the chance of an accurate diagnosis. there are three laboratory techniques usually used to diagnose gonorrhea:
staining biological samples
staining biological samples directly for the bacterium is carried out by placing on a slide a sample of the discharge from the penis or cervix and staining it with a dye
the doctor can usually give you the test results during the consultation
this test is more accurate for men than women, as only 1 in 2 women with the infection have a positive stain
detection of bacterial genes or nucleic acid (dna) test
detection of bacterial genes or nucleic acid (dna) test is carried out using [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] or cervical swabs to detect the genes of the bacteria
this test is often more accurate than culturing the bacteria
[color=red]treatment [/color]
gonorrhea is treated with penicillin or other antibiotics in pill form or by injection, however, the disease is becoming more and more resistant to many standard medications.
antibiotics that are currently used are:
cefixime
ceftriaxone
ciprofloxacin*
ofloxacin*
tetracycline
* the antibiotics ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin should not be taken if you have gonorrhea and are:
pregnant
younger than 18 years old
gonorrhea and chlamydial infection, another common std, often infect people at the same time
a combination of antibiotics is taken which will treat both diseases, such as:
azithromycin
ceftriaxone
doxycycline
all sexual partners should be tested and treated if infected, whether or not they have symptoms of the infection.
if untreated the gonorrhea infection can spread:
into the reproductive tract
and through the bloodstream infecting:
brain (rarely)
heart valves
joints
the most common result of untreated gonorrhea is pelvic inflammatory disease (pid), a serious infection of the female reproductive organs.
gonococcal pelvic inflammatory disease (pid) often appears immediately after menstruation and causes:
in women
abscesses
perihepatitis, an infection around the liver, as a long-term complication
scar tissue to form in the fallopian tubes
sterilization in females
the embryo to implant in the tube causing a tubal (ectopic) pregnancy, which can result in miscarriage and sometimes death of the mother
the fertilized egg not to pass into the uterus if the tubes are partially scarred
in men
arthritis
epididymitis, an inflammation of the testicles that can cause sterility in the long term
other organ infections
skin problems
swelling of the testicles and penis
approximately 2% of persons with untreated gonorrhea may develop disseminated gonococcal infection (dgi).
symptoms include:
arthritis type pain
fever
skin lesions
cheers
tee vee :cool:[/quote]
that is what i have right now. my penis has the same stuff coming out of it all the time.
After coming back from BKK I've got tiny little bumps on the head of my penis now. They're really small, like goosebumps. Nothing in particular hurts, and I'm not having any unusual discharges (as far as I know). I saw a doctor immediately after returning and they did basic tests and didn't find anything. I'd had a full test before going which came out clean - I wanted a full test again but the doc said "your full test was fine before, and your basic's fine now so I don't think you have anything to worry about." Still, goosebumps on the penis here.
He gave me some ointment, but I'm still kinda concerned about it. Anyone know what it could possibly be? And how I can get rid of it?
Azure Knight,
sounds like a fungus, but could also be a skin irritiation due to (hopefully) heavy use of rubber condoms. If it doesn't go away within a few days go see another doctor again.
BTW, did your doctor made a smear test ?
[QUOTE=Azure Knight]After coming back from BKK I've got tiny little bumps on the head of my penis now. They're really small, like goosebumps. Nothing in particular hurts, and I'm not having any unusual discharges
"your full test was fine before, and your basic's fine now so I don't think you have anything to worry about." Anyone know what it could possibly be? And how I can get rid of it?[/QUOTE]
Do a google search on HPV or venereal warts - I THINK this is what you've got... along with 50% of the population!
Actually its incredible that venereal warts, caused by the Human Papiloma Virus is so prevalent (50%) and yet not many people aware/concerned about this - what I would consider - widespread epidemic.
SE Asia Joe
[QUOTE=Johnson994]I have been away from these forums for a while. I have symptoms and have been living with it. I gave up.[/QUOTE]
What u mean u're living with it ? Don't underestimate your symptoms, go to a doctor immediately , best thing to do is a swab test to find out what kind of bacterial is responsible for your disharge.Don't worry is not painfull,very easy and fast.If you got problem with it lets go to the pharmacy and buy treatment for both gonnhorea and clamydia so you'll be sure to kill anything.
If you have synptoms since long time already it wil be harder to erase bacterials so I suggest you what I named [b]HIROSHIMA Therapy[/b] wich consists taking two different drugs at the same time.
I'm not a doctor I'm just telling u what did work for me and for my friends...None of them has been disappointed with H.Therapy :
[b]TROBICIN 2gr. inj.(Spectinomicin chlorid.)[/b] - 1 vial a day for 3 days .(it will erase Neisseria Ghonorrea)
[b]ERYTHROMYCIN 500 mg.tbl. ( Erythrocyn) [/b] - 2000 mg. empty stomach ( 4 tbl. a day) for 2 weeks (it will erase any Non Specyfical Urethritis including Clamydia etc.etc..).
[b] Side effect due to Hiroshima Therapy[/b] :
Antibiotics destroy any kind of bacterials in your body, bad and good ones so you might have symptoms like diarrhea , candida albicans , etcc.. Try to take some vitamins during this therapy and in case you got candida (kind of fungus in your penis) don't worry , just use some cream, once you end therapy you're gonna be ok.
Trust me this is the only way to erase both Gonhorrea and NSU even if you got symptoms since long time and you've becomed chronic.
Therapy is strong but it worked for me and for many fellows like me.
Ps/ Anyway it's a very long time since then I'm using gloves and I suggest u doing the same.
[QUOTE=SE Asia Joe]Do a google search on HPV or venereal warts - I THINK this is what you've got... along with 50% of the population!
Actually its incredible that venereal warts, caused by the Human Papiloma Virus is so prevalent (50%) and yet not many people aware/concerned about this - what I would consider - widespread epidemic.
SE Asia Joe[/QUOTE]
SE Asia Joe,
it should also be mentioned that about 70% of all cancers of the uterus are caused by HPV. There are about 500.000 new cases each year and about 300.000 deaths.
Merck just released a vaccine named Gardasil - GlaxoSmithKline's vaccine Cervarix still needs approval. The US government intends to implement it into their regular vaccine program and any girl between 9 - 26yrs should take it.
There's a very good stuff selled in Thailand for the treatment of small warts,calluses and corns, it's called [b]DUOFILM[/b] (Salicylic Acid + Lactic Acid).
It's not selled anywhere, I found it at the biggest pharmacy in Patpong (after King's Castle) and J.D. Pharmacy in Pattaya (near soi Diamond - second road entrance) .
It's a small bottle containing a liquid to apply on the wart. [b]Be carefull , the liquid is very strong [/b] so only one drop covering the wart will be enough to destroy HPV virus and I suggest to put some vasellin cream to cover the skin surrounding the wart so you won't burn anything else but the wart.
The treatment could be repeated after a week .
In case wart is pretty big I suggest going to a doctor for surgical removal.
MarcoStraight,
lactic acid is often used to get rid of any warts (on feet and so on.)
In the end it's acid and will etch the wart, preventing it to grow. But one drop a week won't be enough, it must be repeated at least twice a day to have an effect. This can be painful because after some time you will have etched away the wart and have an open wound, which will heal afterwards.
Nevertheless I doubt that he has warts. He was talking about many little red spots, not just one or a few warts. I still believe its a harmless fungus. Some cream for a week and he will be fine.
Anyway, he shouldn't be too shy to see a doctor. We can only guess but don't know shit what he really got. Best advice is still to see a doctor.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]MarcoStraight,
lactic acid is often used to get rid of any warts (on feet and so on.)
In the end it's acid and will etch the wart, preventing it to grow. But one drop a week won't be enough, it must be repeated at least twice a day to have an effect. This can be painful because after some time you will have etched away the wart and have an open wound, which will heal afterwards.[/QUOTE]
I'm just telling what did work to me.Duofilm worked to me and to several fellows just with one drop, problem is : you got to start treatment when the wart is still very small .I don't think you should repeat the treatment twice a day...You gonna burn your dick and it's gonna be dangerous.Much better start with a drop , then see what happen, if the wart's still there repet the treatment.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Nevertheless I doubt that he has warts. He was talking about many little red spots, not just one or a few warts. I still believe its a harmless fungus. Some cream for a week and he will be fine.
[/QUOTE]
I think so, warts actually do not come in 'many little red spots', it could be some candida/fungus or herpes simplex.
I'm going to live in Taiwan for a year or so and I plan to take several trips to BKK.:-) Therefore, I'm sure I'll get something and so I suppose I better get ready.
I actually already have HPV. I got it from a long-term GF here in the states. I've never had much for symptoms. But now that we're on the subject, if you already have HPV, will having sex with a HPV+ sex worker cause it to flare up more?
I have my Hep shots, and shots for just about anything else, and I always wrap up before any FS, P4P or not. Also, I don't do anal. It's just too risky if the condom tears in my opinion.
However I still want to get BBBJs from pros in BKK. I heard you can't really catch HIV this way. I'm sure there's a number of things you can get though. Is it worth it to put on the rubber for BJ, in your opinion?
I mean, if I don't have uncovered sex and have all my shots, what's the worst thing that will likely happen to me? I figure if I have to get some antibiotics from time to time, that's the cost of doing business, but I don't want to really screw myself up.
Writing this just in case it helps someone else out there. Over the last couple of years i developed a reaction to Condoms (seriously). Started slowly, but after a couple of years of bi-monthly 1 week stints during which i would go through around 20 of the things, my old fella would start to itch, then develop a burning sensation, and after going home and not having the condoms on, the burning would become unbearable, reach a peak of pain then the skin would start flaking off! All very distressing and awkward when you come home from an overseas trip to Asia!
It reached the point where my old fella would just retreat the instant i brought out the condoms, no matter how horny i was! (I always knew it had a mind of its own) Even wondered if i'd need to start taking some of those blue pills.
Found latex free condoms, and now theres no stopping me again! Zero reaction. They are hard to find over here, but for me worth the search. And no need for blue pills yet!
:-) Ozirob
[QUOTE=Dexadrine]
I mean, if I don't have uncovered sex and have all my shots, what's the worst thing that will likely happen to me? I figure if I have to get some antibiotics from time to time, that's the cost of doing business, but I don't want to really screw myself up.[/QUOTE]
The worst thing could be herpes simplex type 1 or some candida - fungus, you could get it having an uncovered blow job.Forget getting HIV or hepat.C having an uncov. B.J.
Don't take antibiotics time to time, it's not wise.
Taking antibiotics continually it will destroy your immunitary system instead and it will be easier to get candida,fungus or herpes plus antibiotics are VENOM for your body don't forget it.
Take antibiotics just in case you got simptoms not to prevent any disease.
Good luck.
[QUOTE=MarcoStraight]The worst thing could be herpes simplex type 1 or some candida - fungus, you could get it having an uncovered blow job.Forget getting HIV or hepat.C having an uncov. B.J.
Don't take antibiotics time to time, it's not wise.
Taking antibiotics continually it will destroy your immunitary system instead and it will be easier to get candida,fungus or herpes plus antibiotics are VENOM for your body don't forget it.
Take antibiotics just in case you got simptoms not to prevent any disease.
Good luck.[/QUOTE]
MS - you're 99% right.
You can get HIV and/or hep C with BBBJ, although chances usually slim...but it has happened.
Re antibiotics, continued use is not good and often you either develop resistance or reaction. In my particular case, i are now allergic to doxi...reaction is fungus on my penis and other areas. For many people, best solution is to take a probecite (lactosbaccillus - like yogurt) with antibiotic regimen. Women take it all the time when they're on antibiotics.
[QUOTE=MarcoStraight]
I think so, warts actually do not come in 'many little red spots', it could be some candida/fungus or herpes simplex.[/QUOTE]
MarcoStraight,
I doubt that it could be a herpes. If you got some herpes you will have itchy "pimples" filled with liquid which is highly infectious. The pimples will break open after a couple of days and the open wounds may cause some pain.
It's most likely a candida/fungus and he should see a doctor. Seeking advice about STDs in a forum for some self-treatment is a very stupid thing.
Dexadrine,
Traveler1234 is right. Taking antibiotics on a regular basis without any infection is a very bad thing and only does damage rather than good.
Not only that you might get allergic to it, your alimentary system might also get affected - don't forget, you need certain bacterias in your colon to digest properly - and you may develop some fungus.
Furthermore, bacterias might develop resistance against these antibiotics if taken improperly (weak dosis, extended periods). If you really need these antibiotics next time they won't help anymore. Since you intend going BB you might also spread those resistant strains of bacterias and make it worse for the rest of us to fight these bacterias if infected. Doctors all over the world complain about this sort of misbehaviour/drug abuse and another stronger antibiotic must be used. The major problem is, that they are running out of effective antibiotics.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]MarcoStraight,
It's most likely a candida/fungus and he should see a doctor. Seeking advice about STDs in a forum for some self-treatment is a very stupid thing.[/QUOTE]
You need to get complete STD profile, which includes swab and culture of same for all std. To be double safe, might as well get blood drawn for HIV, herpes antibodies, hep a/b/c. And if you still have the lesions, get it cultured for herpes 1 and 2...results on all will come back in under a week if done in states via commercial lab or via doc's office.
More info, check out the center for disease control site, [url]www.cdc.org[/url] (or .com).
[QUOTE=The Traveler]MarcoStraight,
Seeking advice about STDs in a forum for some self-treatment is a very stupid thing.[/QUOTE]
More stupid could be going to some Pattaya's clinic and seing some nurse-doctor who's gonna try to steal as much money he can prescribing you wrong medicines and making fake test. 80 % of the small clinics in Pattaya are something about it.
[QUOTE=Traveler1234]You need to get complete STD profile, which includes swab and culture of same for all std. To be double safe, might as well get blood drawn for HIV, herpes antibodies, hep a/b/c. And if you still have the lesions, get it cultured for herpes 1 and 2...results on all will come back in under a week if done in states via commercial lab or via doc's office.
More info, check out the center for disease control site, [url]www.cdc.org[/url] (or .com).[/QUOTE]
Best hospitals in Thailand to me are Bunrumgrad in Soi nana and Bangkok Pattaya on sukhumvit Road Pattaya.
Bangkok Pattaya Hospital doesn't make all the test,for ex. they gonna send HSV type 1 and 2 to Bangkok.I knew people who were disappointed with doctors in Bangkok Pattaya Hospital so having a basic experience about this kind of disease can really help.
Guys,
need some hint from the experets.
I will be in Bangkok the first time early August.
Now in Korea I might not have enough quality condoms with me.
So what is your best condom in Thailand and where to get it.
Look for the thin type of course, but western sized and as I read in this forum it should be a western brand.
So what and where?
Thanks if you can help.
regards
Brain666
[QUOTE=Ozirob]Writing this just in case it helps someone else out there. Over the last couple of years i developed a reaction to Condoms (seriously). Started slowly, but after a couple of years of bi-monthly 1 week stints during which i would go through around 20 of the things, my old fella would start to itch, then develop a burning sensation, and after going home and not having the condoms on, the burning would become unbearable, reach a peak of pain then the skin would start flaking off! All very distressing and awkward when you come home from an overseas trip to Asia!
It reached the point where my old fella would just retreat the instant i brought out the condoms, no matter how horny i was! (I always knew it had a mind of its own) Even wondered if i'd need to start taking some of those blue pills.
Found latex free condoms, and now theres no stopping me again! Zero reaction. They are hard to find over here, but for me worth the search. And no need for blue pills yet!
:-) Ozirob[/QUOTE]I knew I couldn't be the only one.
All of a sudden, last year, I developed the same reaction to condoms as you did. I originally thought it was a latex thing, but I have since found that it was the spermacide. I have switched to latex condoms w/o spermacide and have not had issues since.
Hope this helps. I'm planning my 1st trip to Thailand and came across your post
[QUOTE=Brain666]Guys,
need some hint from the experets.
I will be in Bangkok the first time early August.
Now in Korea I might not have enough quality condoms with me.
So what is your best condom in Thailand and where to get it.
Brain666[/QUOTE]Best I can get is Body Guard they have size 54 or 56. Never buy Durex locally as they are locally produced and too small and do not fit at all. Body Guard is the best (thin and lub) what I have found and the advantage is that most good pharmacies sell them.
[QUOTE=Eric Thai Addict]Best I can get is Body Guard they have size 54 or 56. Never buy Durex locally as they are locally produced and too small and do not fit at all. Body Guard is the best (thin and lub) what I have found and the advantage is that most good pharmacies sell them.[/QUOTE]Eric Thai Addict,
Perhaps you were mixed up with DUO condoms?
In my opinion Durex make a fine easyfit (slightly bulb shaped) size 54mm condom titled 'comfort' available in 7eleven stores in Sukhumwit, Pat Pong and some other places. It is quite thin and equivalent to extra thin ones avail in Germany and Australia in my opinion. Pack is dark blue with a galaxy like swirl in the bottom left corner coloured light blue, puple and pink. I have not seen the body-guard condoms at all in Thailand so can't comment on them.
Not trying to cause an argument, but there are several very reputable websites that see oral insertive sex (i.e. receiving a bj) as NO risk. One of which is the site for Johns Hopkins University, a world leader in AIDS research and the word of the primary HIV specialist there, Dr. Joel Gallant. Another site is called aidsmeds.com and they have considerable documented data regarding the transmission vectors of HIV. To quote, "There has never been one documented case of HIV transmission from receiving a blowjob". Another site making the same claim is one of the oldest and most respected authorities on HIV in San Francisco, HIV Insite.
There is only a theoretical risk of oral from female to male, and in 25 years of HIV (or more) no one has ever gotten it that way (not to be confused with male to female which has been documented). For example, there was a long study done with some 19,000 participants, all couples. One of each of the partners was HIV positive and the only protection used was for intercourse and not oral. Not one person in this several year study that started off HIV negative contracted the disease.
If you are walking down the street you also have a theoretical risk of getting hit by a meteor, just to put it in perspective.
The information out there is mixed for several reasons, not the least of which are political and religious. I guess we all pick our own truthes and go from there.
I have a question, not having had an STD before my knowledge is not the best.
The discussion of which bars test, and how often, rears its head frequently, by those sensible travellers looking to stay clean. My question is this...
The best places in the whole country will not be performing a test more than once a week. In my example lets say its Sunday, so on Sunday Khun XXX is clean, but on Sunday night she unknowingly contracts an STD from a customer. During the next 6 days, she works non stop, servicing around 3 customers per day. (don't forget, she's working in one of the best places)
Why is this BG any safer than a girl that doesn't get tested, i see it that the only person who is guaranteed an STD free party, is the very first guy she services after her check up - every person after that is at risk again.
On this basis, the test is worthless, i must be missing something...right ?
Meaty,
And seen as HIV has an incubation period of 3 months, even the first bloke is still at risk!!!
Sid
Just wanted to respond to Meaty's post.
An STD/HIV test only confirms a person's illness/infection status at the EXACT MOMENT the test is being conducted. All STDs have a 'window-period' before the infection builds up enough for the body to begin creating antibodies, the presence of which is generally the indicator of infection. This means, for example, I could get infected on Monday and have a test on Tuesday which comes back 'clean', but by Wednesday (depending on the incubation period of the particular STD) I could have become infectious.
Please be aware that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS 'CLEAN' when it comes to STD tests in sex workers, or any other person who is regularly sexually active. The ONLY people who can truthfully claim that they are completely disease-free are VIRGINS, or people who have had routine STD screenings over six to twelve months and have not had ANY sexual contact in that entire time. Regardless of your previous STD status, the very second you have sex, the window period starts again.
So in response to Meaty's comment about STD tests being worthless...
Why should sex workers be regularly tested? Because many STDs can cause long-term health problems like PID, infertility and even cancer in women if they are not detected and treated early. A sex worker needs to have regular tests to protect HER OWN health.
How does this benefit you, as clients? IT DOESN'T!! This is one of the main reasons why sex worker organisations and health workers argue AGAINST (Government enforced) mandatory testing of sex workers - because it creates a false sense of security amongst clients. If men believe that the girl is 'safe', they are more likely to request (or even take by force) unprotected sex.
The simple fact is, if you indulge in unsafe sex practices, it doesn't matter whether the girl has a test once a week or once a year - you still run the risk of infection. Remember: If a girl you have never met before offers to blow you or have sex with you without a condom, regardless of what she says (you're so cute, you're paying more, you're so kind to her, blah, blah, blah) you can pretty much be assured that SHE PROBABLY DOES IT FOR EVERYONE!! (And for the record, that goes for every girl/guy you have sex with, hooker or not).
The 'safest' sex you can have is with a worker who insists on strict condom use and WILL NOT compromise, no matter what the offer or circumstances. That way you can probably assume that every client before you has done the same thing.
[QUOTE=Rubber Nursey]....A sex worker needs to have regular tests to protect HER OWN health....How does this benefit you, as clients? IT DOESN'T!! .....[/QUOTE]
Exactly what i was thinking, but i wasn't sure i was right, good post.
I should add, just for the record, that a sex worker who has regular STD tests AND consistently uses condoms, is going to present a much smaller risk to you in case of an accident, like the condom breaking or coming off. Obviously, there is always a slight risk of condom failure and because of that, a sex worker who takes care of her own sexual health is always going to be a safer option than one who couldn't care less.
However, that only applies to real accidents - not when she 'accidentally' lets you come in her mouth or 'accidentally' gets carried away and starts having sex with you without a condom! Like I said before, if she does that to you, she's more than likely done it to others.
Rubber Nursey,
absolutely correct.
We should also add, that girls can easily get around those tests in case the test is more than a slogan at the bar or gogo.
[QUOTE=MarcoStraight]What u mean u're living with it ? Don't underestimate your symptoms, go to a doctor immediately , best thing to do is a swab test to find out what kind of bacterial is responsible for your disharge.Don't worry is not painfull,very easy and fast.If you got problem with it lets go to the pharmacy and buy treatment for both gonnhorea and clamydia so you'll be sure to kill anything.
If you have synptoms since long time already it wil be harder to erase bacterials so I suggest you what I named [b]HIROSHIMA Therapy[/b] wich consists taking two different drugs at the same time.
I'm not a doctor I'm just telling u what did work for me and for my friends...None of them has been disappointed with H.Therapy :
[b]TROBICIN 2gr. inj.(Spectinomicin chlorid.)[/b] - 1 vial a day for 3 days .(it will erase Neisseria Ghonorrea)
[b]ERYTHROMYCIN 500 mg.tbl. ( Erythrocyn) [/b] - 2000 mg. empty stomach ( 4 tbl. a day) for 2 weeks (it will erase any Non Specyfical Urethritis including Clamydia etc.etc..).
[b] Side effect due to Hiroshima Therapy[/b] :
Antibiotics destroy any kind of bacterials in your body, bad and good ones so you might have symptoms like diarrhea , candida albicans , etcc.. Try to take some vitamins during this therapy and in case you got candida (kind of fungus in your penis) don't worry , just use some cream, once you end therapy you're gonna be ok.
Trust me this is the only way to erase both Gonhorrea and NSU even if you got symptoms since long time and you've becomed chronic.
Therapy is strong but it worked for me and for many fellows like me.
Ps/ Anyway it's a very long time since then I'm using gloves and I suggest u doing the same.[/QUOTE]
Yes. I am living with it. I had been going to the doctors many times taking many diffrent medecines. While taking it would start to feel better but it would never get rid of it and the symptoms came back. The one thing I did not do what the doctors told not to do was not to have sex. Since they tried every thing I gave up and I am living with it. I just make the best of it.
[QUOTE=Johnson994]Yes. I am living with it. I had been going to the doctors many times taking many diffrent medecines. While taking it would start to feel better but it would never get rid of it and the symptoms came back. The one thing I did not do what the doctors told not to do was not to have sex. Since they tried every thing I gave up and I am living with it. I just make the best of it.[/QUOTE]
Living with it??? Unless you've got HIV or herpes, in this day and age there is no excuse for 'living with' an STD! *IF* you went to the doctor and got properly diagnosed with an infection and *IF* you followed the treatment regime to the letter, it should have cleared up by now. Yes, sometimes there are bugs that are a little harder to budge than others, but that's why follow-up checks and (if still infected) continued treatment are imperative until you get the all-clear from your doctor.
Aside from discontinuing treatment before the course of antibiotics was finished, there is only one thing that I can think of that would explain why you're still sick - you've been having unprotected sex with your wife/girlfriend/FB and reinfecting yourself. If that is the case, then you should be thoroughly ashamed of your selfish, irresponsible behaviour. A) It means you participated in sexual activity whilst infected, knowing full well that you could infect your partner and B) It means that your partner currently has an STD that can do SERIOUS harm to her body and you obviously haven't told her that she has it. Women very rarely get symptoms of STDs like chlamydia and gonorrhea, so they have no idea they have it unless they get screened. A women in a relationship would probably not consider that she NEEDS an STD test unless her partner tells her that she is at risk. Without treatment, STDs in women can cause PID, infertility and cancer - PID can even result in death in some cases. Is keeping your infidelity (and the resultant infection) secret, really worth your partners life?
If I've got the wrong idea here, then I apologise profusely - but if what I've said is the truth, then you had better get yourself AND YOUR PARTNER to a doctor, ASAP, and get this sorted. If you're not being reinfected by a partner, and your problem really is because the treatment just didn't work, you cannot run around having sex with sex workers or other women - condom or not - whilst KNOWINGLY infected. GET BACK TO THE DOCTOR.
[QUOTE=Johnson994]Yes. I am living with it. I had been going to the doctors many times taking many diffrent medecines. While taking it would start to feel better but it would never get rid of it and the symptoms came back. The one thing I did not do what the doctors told not to do was not to have sex. Since they tried every thing I gave up and I am living with it. I just make the best of it.[/QUOTE]
I agree with Rubber Nursey...no excuse for living with STD . Soon your so called light symptoms like disharge or hitching will turn in a nightmare , your prostate gland will be the first organ paying consequence of your "easy behaviour". The fact you can't erase the problem sounds to me you keep on banging without protection....In this case there's no cure in the world ...
Good luck.
[QUOTE=MarcoStraight]I agree with Rubber Nursey...no excuse for living with STD . Soon your so called light symptoms like disharge or hitching will turn in a nightmare , your prostate gland will be the first organ paying consequence of your "easy behaviour". The fact you can't erase the problem sounds to me you keep on banging without protection....In this case there's no cure in the world ...
Good luck.[/QUOTE]What will happen?
[QUOTE=Johnson994]What will happen?[/QUOTE]
A ) Local complications
Littritis
Balanoposthitis
Acute epididymo-orchitis
cystitis
acute and chronic prostatitis
acute proctocolitis
paraurethral abscess
urethral stricture
B) Systemic complications
Pneumonia
Endocarditis
Heart problem
Stroke
Acute perihepetitis (Fitz-Hugh-Curtis Syndrome)
C) Long term complications
* Infertility
* Impotence
* Pelvic inflammatory diseases
* Salpingitis
* Skenitis
* Bartholinitis
* Cystitis
In other words... bacterials will invade your organs all...
......Again Good Luck
I've had an interesting couple of experiences I'd like to share and get some feedback. Twice in the last 2 months or so, I've encountered a RED condom at 2 different establishments in Chiang Mai. My sexy provider supplied a strawberry condom that I thought was kind of cool. At first. We started the deed, then as I withdrew my dick to slap it around some on her pussy, I noticed my hand was stained a bit red. Yup, she was on her period! The first time, I thought this was a one-time "woops" by my provider. However, yesterday, it happened again. She happened to supply me with another RED condom. She sat on me for awhile, then as I rotated up on top of her, I pulled out for a sec. Then as I reinserted myself, I noticed some red on my hand. Once again, she was on her period. It kind of freaks me out to see the blood for obvious reasons. I immediately got up and washed up. The girl was very apologetic, but then the RED condom has my suspicions.
Here's my suspicion -- Either they know they are very close to having their period so they use a RED condom as a "just in case" -- or, they know full well they are on their period and try to get a quickie in hoping I don't notice. Either way, they purposely use a RED condom for deception.
Anyone else have a similar experience?
[QUOTE=Asian John]I've had an interesting couple of experiences I'd like to share and get some feedback. Twice in the last 2 months or so, I've encountered a RED condom at 2 different establishments in Chiang Mai. My sexy provider supplied a strawberry condom that I thought was kind of cool. At first. We started the deed, then as I withdrew my dick to slap it around some on her pussy, I noticed my hand was stained a bit red. Yup, she was on her period! The first time, I thought this was a one-time "woops" by my provider. However, yesterday, it happened again. She happened to supply me with another RED condom. She sat on me for awhile, then as I rotated up on top of her, I pulled out for a sec. Then as I reinserted myself, I noticed some red on my hand. Once again, she was on her period. It kind of freaks me out to see the blood for obvious reasons. I immediately got up and washed up. The girl was very apologetic, but then the RED condom has my suspicions.
Here's my suspicion -- Either they know they are very close to having their period so they use a RED condom as a "just in case" -- or, they know full well they are on their period and try to get a quickie in hoping I don't notice. Either way, they purposely use a RED condom for deception.
Anyone else have a similar experience?[/QUOTE]
No, but I [B]WILL[/B] remember that!
[QUOTE=Asian John]Here's my suspicion -- Either they know they are very close to having their period so they use a RED condom as a "just in case" -- or, they know full well they are on their period and try to get a quickie in hoping I don't notice. Either way, they purposely use a RED condom for deception.
Anyone else have a similar experience?[/QUOTE]Sounds a bit strange to me. Have the girls in Thailand never heard of "soft tampons", "sponges" and similar devices they can push up their vagina to soak up the menstrual blood? This method is much safer for the girl - not for the customer of course - then a red condom. If a girl uses a sponge during her period you will never notice unless the smell gives her away, which is not always the case.
Greets
Harry
[QUOTE=Harry770]Have the girls in Thailand never heard of "soft tampons", "sponges" and similar devices they can push up their vagina to soak up the menstrual blood? [/QUOTE]
Harry,
they have and they use them, but like everywhere else, different people have different preferences.
I know some girls who prefer sponges, others like tampons and some simply prefer sanitary napkins.
To each it's own.
[QUOTE=Harry770]Sounds a bit strange to me. Have the girls in Thailand never heard of "soft tampons", "sponges" and similar devices they can push up their vagina to soak up the menstrual blood? This method is much safer for the girl - not for the customer of course - then a red condom. If a girl uses a sponge during her period you will never notice unless the smell gives her away, which is not always the case.
Harry[/QUOTE]Harry,
I'm pleased to report that not many Thai girls use Sponges and not pleased to report that many Thai girls are too shy to have sex during their period.
This is a bad problem if the girl is your girlfriend and you are particularly horny.
Many Thai girls have very short vaginas without a sponge cutting off a good percentage of the length.
At Poseidon one girl continually denied having a sponge in, even after my finger confirmed it absolutely without doubt, but eventually took it out on the sly without me seeing it.
I am often suspicious re a girl using a sponge if I m having difficulty getting my cock in very far. A sponge wrecks the feel completely.
A simple finger in the pussy will then confirm that the sponge is in and often not very far down.
Sponges are a hazard to Condoms. When the sponge rubs against the condom, it can break. This happened to me 2 years ago while vigorously fucking a beautiful romanian girl in an FKK club in Frankfurt. Suprisingly she wasn't that upset that the condom broke and seemed to believe that the sponge was extra protection even though it broke the condom. I never let her use a sponge after that and she has been superb always.
Might be of interest here: a ( subjective! ) report about the risks of getting infected with STDs in the local P4P scene.
[URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?p=499576[/URL]
Giotto
Any time you see a guy/bloke/fella drinking water in a bar in Pattaya, the chances are he has the clap or something worse. There are no educated hookers there, there are no ways of saying a bar girl is riskier than a freelancer and a go go girl is half safe. They are all from the same neck of the woods. They are all uneducated rice famers' daughters and many of them have been FORCED into unsafe sex. Pattaya is rife with the clap. In Soi 6 short time hotels, they can have 15 or more punters a day pumping into them. You can imagine the type of shit goes on at Boyztown, the discos, Beach Road etc.
If you don't want a nasty souvenir, stick with the same bird, always wear a condom and blah blah blah. Any time you move from that, you are taking a risk. Anybody ho says othersise is giving you a bum steer/bad advice. setting you up for a clinic visit.
You are not the only horny dude/fella/chap arriving in Pattaya. Lots others are playing the odds too. They arrive by the planeload at all hours of the day and night. Ask a few of the slappers how many want bareback from them. The good thing about this lottery is most get a chance to win. Every single hooker in Thailand is high risk and if you think otherwise, buy blueberries and lots of liquids.
Regarding the clap never believe anything you read on the net. If you do, you will be drinking water and pissing blades.
Cheers.
[url]http://www.internationalsexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=500019&postcount=2162[/url]
I posted in the wrong thread really but was partially agreeing with "Martians" in some ways, howoever extended the comment well beyond regular working girls, but concentrating on HIV (the really dangerous one) more so.
"Some reports say it is impossible to catch Clamydia from a blow job but I remain un-convinced."
I think that is wise. I can promise you that you can contract Clamydia from getting a blowjob.
Actually, that is the most common way to contract it today among teenagers.
Take care.
[QUOTE=Mick Licker][url]http://www.internationalsexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=500019&postcount=2162[/url]
I posted in the wrong thread really but was partially agreeing with "Martians" in some ways, howoever extended the comment well beyond regular working girls, but concentrating on HIV (the really dangerous one) more so.[/QUOTE]
Decided to heed the logical advice of several posters on this thread to buy my Viagra in BKK ‘cause it’s cheap, but my condoms at home ‘cause the home variety are supposedly larger, better, and less likely to break at that most critical moment. Went to Wal-Mart - the American icon of value. Picked out a box of 12 of USA’s finest rubbers. Brought them home. Only then looked closely at the box. “Made in Thailand,” it said. Hummm.
Daddy
[QUOTE=D Master]"Some reports say it is impossible to catch Clamydia from a blow job but I remain un-convinced."
I think that is wise. I can promise you that you can contract Clamydia from getting a blowjob.
Actually, that is the most common way to contract it today among teenagers.
Take care.[/QUOTE]
What's the difference between the throat and the vagina to bacteria? All they want is a warm, moist place and they will happily multiply and thrive.
[QUOTE=Daddy07]Decided to heed the logical advice of several posters on this thread to buy my Viagra in BKK ‘cause it’s cheap, but my condoms at home ‘cause the home variety are supposedly larger, better, and less likely to break at that most critical moment. Went to Wal-Mart - the American icon of value. Picked out a box of 12 of USA’s finest rubbers. Brought them home. Only then looked closely at the box. “Made in Thailand,” it said. Hummm.
Daddy[/QUOTE]
Yes, isn't that strange; but, apparently they are export only because you have a hard time finding larger condoms here. It's not impossible, but difficult. Some of the Thai manufacturers do market a larger condom in Thailand. It's better to bring your own favorite brand from the States. I tried the regular Thai brand Durex once and couldn't get it on because it was too small. Others have reported that they break easily because they are streached too much on a farang schlong. Never tried the larger ones so I can't comment. Try the web site for condom depot: they have some very interesting items.
Are you sure a dozen condoms is enough? How many days are you staying?
[QUOTE=Retired Army]Yes, isn't that strange; but, apparently they are export only because you have a hard time finding larger condoms here. It's not impossible, but difficult. Some of the Thai manufacturers do market a larger condom in Thailand. It's better to bring your own favorite brand from the States. I tried the regular Thai brand Durex once and couldn't get it on because it was too small. Others have reported that they break easily because they are streached too much on a farang schlong. Never tried the larger ones so I can't comment. Try the web site for condom depot: they have some very interesting items.
Are you sure a dozen condoms is enough? How many days are you staying?[/QUOTE]Have you ever tried the Durex Excitex (I am not sure if I get the spelling right). They are bigger and a bit more expensive (I think 58 Baht for 3 available in every 7/11). I allways stock up in Thailand and carry them to HK and China, because I didn't find them outside Thailand yet. They come in black boxes. Don't mistake them with Kingtex, which are too small.
[QUOTE=Retired Army]What's the difference between the throat and the vagina to bacteria? All they want is a warm, moist place and they will happily multiply and thrive.[/QUOTE]I have a bit of knowledge here. The difference between betwen a vagina and a mouth is that a mouth is 'dirtier'!
I visited an STD clinic in Aus last year, after an encounter with someone dodgy, and although I was OK, I was informed by the expert doctor that it is entirely possible to get it that way, and Syph and Gon, if it is also there. However, he said, and most resources now say ( and don't treat this as an excuse to go bareback) that Hep C is pretty much impossible to contract unless you have an infected knob.
Chalymidia is however fucken rampant, and rarely has symptoms in both sexes until too late, so beware.
Anyone who goes bareback with a working girl is a fucken idiot, like not wearing a seatbelt, eventually your luck will run out!
[QUOTE=Tiger 1]Have you ever tried the Durex Excitex (I am not sure if I get the spelling right). They are bigger and a bit more expensive (I think 58 Baht for 3 available in every 7/11). I allways stock up in Thailand and carry them to HK and China, because I didn't find them outside Thailand yet. They come in black boxes. Don't mistake them with Kingtex, which are too small.[/QUOTE]
No, I have never tried them. When I need comdoms I order them over the internet. There is a special one my GF really likes called the Ria Wrangler. It has raised ribs on the head and raised dots on the shaft for that "rough" ride.
[QUOTE=Retired Army] Are you sure a dozen condoms is enough? How many days are you staying?
Gee, R.T., now I'm not so sure. I'm staying 3 weeks. Do you think maybe if they don't break, I could use some of them twice? At $3.72 US for the whole box of 12, I thought they were kinda eaxpensive. :D
Daddy
[QUOTE=Petemcc]
Chalymidia is however fucken rampant, and rarely has symptoms in both sexes until too late, so beware.[/QUOTE]Actually chlamydia is frequently asymptomatic in women but most of the time (80%+ I believe) causes a painful unit in men. It is pretty easily treatable with antibiotics. Some of the other bugs are much harder to treat as we all know.
PB
[QUOTE=Retired Army]Yes, isn't that strange; but, apparently they are export only because you have a hard time finding larger condoms here. It's not impossible, but difficult. Some of the Thai manufacturers do market a larger condom in Thailand. It's better to bring your own favorite brand from the States. I tried the regular Thai brand Durex once and couldn't get it on because it was too small. Others have reported that they break easily because they are streached too much on a farang schlong. Never tried the larger ones so I can't comment. Try the web site for condom depot: they have some very interesting items.
Are you sure a dozen condoms is enough? How many days are you staying?[/QUOTE]
The Durex 54mm nominal width with bulb shaped knob is avail these days in most 7/11 in Sukhumwit area. This is a thin condom with comfortable fit for good feeling (big enough for most guys but maybe not all). Packet is dark blue with a small pink streak.
A couple of years back seemed to have to go to patpong to get them.
Standard Thai size is 49mm (small) and 52mm is the common medium size.
I have seen size 56mm is Germany but not in Thailand.
Most girls prefer the smooth "Riap" style but some may like rough ones.
Good lube is essential as lack of lube is sure way for condoms to break (or rubbing against a girl with a sponge inside is another way to break condoms) . KY is is crap (too sticky), although the newer KY warming liquid is a big improvement. Lubafax a little better.
Condomi (available in Germany) make really big tubes of really great lube gel (also Ritex) that is not sticky and almost tasteless. Never found anything else as good. Not sure if can be bought in other countries.
In Thailand the Durex "Play" is o.k. gel but still on the sticky side. I go for this one if I run out.
Kingtex, as Tiger1 said, is probably the tighest fit condom around and quite uncomfortable for some despite the name. Must be reverse psychology I guess.
[QUOTE=Martians]Any time you see a guy/bloke/fella drinking water in a bar in Pattaya, the chances are he has the clap or something worse. [/QUOTE]
Martians,
could you please explain why drinking water indicates a VD ?
I have absolutely no VD or anything worse but like to drink water. It's the best drink anybody can have, no sugar, no alcohol.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Martians,
could you please explain why drinking water indicates a VD ?
I have absolutely no VD or anything worse but like to drink water. It's the best drink anybody can have, no sugar, no alcohol.[/QUOTE]
TT
I guess I must have a chronic STD infection - when I walk into the sports bar at Mr. G's, they know to bring a big bottle of water to me. Damn, that's why even the Duck and the Pesky one ignored me
RLMAO :D
T1234,
that explains it !
I was wondering why you walked so strange. I thought you must either be a cowboy or have sore balls for whatever reason. Or maybe both.
Also your hat and the spures at your boots were a bit irritating for me, but I thought they were remains of your last visit to the dungeon :)
With the change of carryon and no liquids for air travel. I am looking for a place to get good lube in around nana in bkk. i do not like ky. I have used Euros germany product. Need something that is not sticky. thanks strikesfun
QUOTE=Mick Licker]The Durex 54mm nominal width with bulb shaped knob is avail these days in most 7/11 in Sukhumwit area. This is a thin condom with comfortable fit for good feeling (big enough for most guys but maybe not all). Packet is dark blue with a small pink streak.
A couple of years back seemed to have to go to patpong to get them.
Standard Thai size is 49mm (small) and 52mm is the common medium size.
I have seen size 56mm is Germany but not in Thailand.
Most girls prefer the smooth "Riap" style but some may like rough ones.
Good lube is essential as lack of lube is sure way for condoms to break (or rubbing against a girl with a sponge inside is another way to break condoms) . KY is is crap (too sticky), although the newer KY warming liquid is a big improvement. Lubafax a little better.
Condomi (available in Germany) make really big tubes of really great lube gel (also Ritex) that is not sticky and almost tasteless. Never found anything else as good. Not sure if can be bought in other countries.
In Thailand the Durex "Play" is o.k. gel but still on the sticky side. I go for this one if I run out.
Kingtex, as Tiger1 said, is probably the tighest fit condom around and quite uncomfortable for some despite the name. Must be reverse psychology I guess.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Strikesfun]With the change of carryon and no liquids for air travel. I am looking for a place to get good lube in around nana in bkk. i do not like ky. I have used Euros germany product. Need something that is not sticky. thanks strikesfun
[/QUOTE]
Put your lube in your checked in luggage. There is no problem in doing that, the only liquid bans are in carry on, and even then it is only on some very limited routes.
[QUOTE=Strikesfun]
Kingtex, as Tiger1 said, is probably the tighest fit condom around and quite uncomfortable for some despite the name. Must be reverse psychology I guess.[/QUOTE]I just found some further information:
Kingtex: 49 mm (the name is ridiculous), most other Durex Condoms 52 mm, Excita: 53 mm, Comfort: 54 mm
So no wonder the Kingtex is a squeeze on.
Some of the readers will have followed a discussion in the "Giotto's Lodge in Bangkok" thread about risk assessment for the transmission of STDs / HIV. Some people are still dealing quite irresponsible with that information about HIV and STD's in the Fight Club and using it in the context of a very low level controversy. To all those who are seriously interested in facts here a link to an informative website about the issue:
[URL]http://www.sfaf.org/aids101/transmission.html[/URL]
Established in 1982, the San Francisco AIDS Foundation is one of the oldest and largest community-based AIDS service organizations in the United States.
In topic "Requirements for Transmission to Occur" it is clearly stated:
"3. ...and it must get into the bloodstream.
It is not enough to come into contact with an infected fluid to become infected. [b]Healthy, unbroken skin does not allow HIV to get into the body; it is an excellent barrier to HIV infection. HIV can enter only through an open cut or sore[/b], or through contact with the mucous membranes in the anus and rectum, the genitals, the mouth, and the eyes."
During the discussion in the "Giotto's Lodge in Bangkok" thread it was pointed out by another poster, that there is a transmission risk via normal skin because microscopical cuts may exist, caused by smaller injuries, pedicure etc. .
There is nothing more to say about this issue. Everybody may decide for himself how he considers the risk of having microscopical cuts at his fingers which could cause a transmission of the virus into the bloodstream. I also believe that nobody with an [b]open cut or sore[/b] at his fingers will seriously bring this wound into contact with female body fluids.
------------
Though I am quite sure this post will cause replies with more nonsense in the Fight Club I feel responsible for what I wrote before in my risks assessment report. This is the reason why I clarify this issue here, it is simply too important.
Giotto
[quote=the traveler]martians,
could you please explain why drinking water indicates a vd ?
i have absolutely no vd or anything worse but like to drink water. it's the best drink anybody can have, no sugar, no alcohol.[/quote]martians is probably referencing hep c with his water comment. people with hep c are told to avoid any substances toxic to the liver, including alcohol. even moderate amounts of alcohol speed up the progression of hepatitis c, and alcohol reduces the effectiveness of treatment. nonetheless, i still wouldn't draw the conclusion he did.
Hi!
I´m not experienced in Bangoko Thai brothels and MP's. I will try them first time in November/December. But when I bring my "Dentist" fluid with me do they rinse out their mouths by request. This is a rather way to avoid some STD´s. I practise that for mostly 8-10 years with girls and never had a STD based on mouth transmitted pests.
I use Betaisodona and Hexeditin
Cheers, SAB
At Sweet and Bitter: "I use Betaisodona and Hexeditin".
Allow me the question: when and where do you use it? Only when you condom brakes or everytime as a prophylaxis ? Before or after ?
I allways carry some "wound desinfection spray" from europe with me. It doesn`t burn, just cools, which is sometimes pretty nice :-). I only use it when madam was very very wet and I fear having gotten to much liquids everywhere. So I clean with the spray after washing .
@Higgins T: I t is only effective on bacterium in the mouth. I rinse out my mouth (and the girls mouth) before and after. This turns down the risk of infections but only on bacterial transferable STD´s. Better then nothing.
Cheers, SAB
@sweet and bitter: ha ha, thank you very much for telling me - it's for the mouth! Otherwise, I would have probably put my willie in it! I think, I'll stay with the desinfection spray since I avoid bbj, I don't need betaisadona. I avoid any "bare"-contacts just to go sure and not bring home a souvenier.
Good luck to you!
[QUOTE=Patbutter]Actually chlamydia is frequently asymptomatic in women but most of the time (80%+ I believe) causes a painful unit in men. It is pretty easily treatable with antibiotics. Some of the other bugs are much harder to treat as we all know.
PB[/QUOTE]I think we'll have to agree to disagree on the % ( oh and by the way, sorry about the typo, drinking beer and typing do not go together very well!). Some reports say 50% of men are asymptomatic, some say less.
Treatment- yeah, easy, however, wrt Giotto's thread, the big danger with HIV is that anyone with an existing STI ( or STD- depending on your terminology) is at greater risk from getting infected with HIV, not just because of sores- they are fucken obvious, but because of an inflamed urethra in the case of a man. Most STIs will cause an inflamed urethra, which may be just below the threshold of reportable symptoms of an STI.
In Australia, the WGs at brothels give your dick a thorough examination before use, and even though it's covered sex, they will turn you down if you have any kind of lesion on your dick, or substantial reddening of your Jap's eye!
There's a lot of shit spoken about HIV, but sure as fuck unprotected sex is a good way of getting it. Interestingly, HIV strains are starting to show resistance to current treatment due to mutation. Retroviruses like HIV are bastards to treat in the first place, and there are few points of vulnrability- reverse transcriptase from memory is the best, and viruses such as HIV which have in all probability crossed the species barrier, tend to be adept at mutating.
So anyone who believes that they can take the risk, and if they get infected live on a cocktail of drugs for many years, be aware, science has not caught up with viruses, which have been around for as long as DNA/RNA. Specifically RNA viruses like HIV 'exploit all mechanisms of genetic variation to ensure their survival'.
Comonsense is required here chaps, and there is plenty of info on the safe sex forum, I think.
Pete
one of my biggest pet peeves are these uneducated rice village girls that work in the go go bars. they don't tell anyone that they're on their period, not even mamasan.
this is the second time i've f*ck a girl and found blood on the condom. the last girl got emotionally upset because i lost all interest in sex after that, she kept asking me "why?"
talk about unsafe!
[quote=bruce_lee]one of my biggest pet peeves are these uneducated rice village girls that work in the go go bars. they don't tell anyone that they're on their period, not even mamasan.
this is the second time i've f*ck a girl and found blood on the condom. the last girl got emotionally upset because i lost all interest in sex after that, she kept asking me "why?"
talk about unsafe![/quote]blood is the main carrier for std´s - absolutely unsafe - even with condom! if you have scratches in any kind this is like suicide!
cheers,
sab
[QUOTE=Giotto]Some of the readers will have followed a discussion in the "Giotto's Lodge in Bangkok" thread about risk assessment for the transmission of STDs / HIV. Some people are still dealing quite irresponsible with that information about HIV and STD's in the Fight Club and using it in the context of a very low level controversy. To all those who are seriously interested in facts here a link to an informative website about the issue:
[URL]http://www.sfaf.org/aids101/transmission.html[/URL]
Established in 1982, the San Francisco AIDS Foundation is one of the oldest and largest community-based AIDS service organizations in the United States.
In topic "Requirements for Transmission to Occur" it is clearly stated:
"3. ...and it must get into the bloodstream.
It is not enough to come into contact with an infected fluid to become infected. [b]Healthy, unbroken skin does not allow HIV to get into the body; it is an excellent barrier to HIV infection. HIV can enter only through an open cut or sore[/b], or through contact with the mucous membranes in the anus and rectum, the genitals, the mouth, and the eyes."
During the discussion in the "Giotto's Lodge in Bangkok" thread it was pointed out by another poster, that there is a transmission risk via normal skin because microscopical cuts may exist, caused by smaller injuries, pedicure etc. .
There is nothing more to say about this issue. Everybody may decide for himself how he considers the risk of having microscopical cuts at his fingers which could cause a transmission of the virus into the bloodstream. I also believe that nobody with an [b]open cut or sore[/b] at his fingers will seriously bring this wound into contact with female body fluids.
[/QUOTE]
Seems that those "microscopic wounds" still keep you busy :)
Just a side note :
I personally would be very careful giving advice or adjusting my behaviour depending on something that has been written on the web, especially regarding this subject. All sorts of nonsense can be found at the web, there are even websites which claim that unprotected sex is safe or even that HIV/AIDS does not exist at all. You can find a website for any sort of argumentation, so only relying on a webpage can be risky.
I rather stick to the ever valid rule "better safe than sorry".
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Seems that those "microscopic wounds" still keep you busy :)
Just a side note :
I personally would be very careful giving advice or adjusting my behaviour depending on something that has been written on the web, especially regarding this subject. All sorts of nonsense can be found at the web, there are even websites which claim that unprotected sex is safe or even that HIV/AIDS does not exist at all. You can find a website for any sort of argumentation, so only relying on a webpage can be risky.
I rather stick to the ever valid rule "better safe than sorry".[/QUOTE]
You are totally correct in all aspects. Only tonight I got covered in blood from a twat who wanted to fight with me in a hospital energency depertment. The staff there get it all the time, and although they shouldn't have told me, they said that the patient was not infectious for what we worry about.
Condoms are 100% safe when used properly. Shit, I even argue with my wife about this and she is a science teacher with a degree in pharmacology. Sometimes people believe shit that is published. Yeah, people may get HIV with condoms, but were the condoms used properly? Personally, when I shagged a certain Thai girl, I almost willed the condom to come off(!) and indeed it broke- it was a Thai version, because men heve that need to fel skin on skin. As a protective barrier, condoms are the best. In N. Ireland, the IRA bastards used to use them as incendiary devices because it would take so long for acid to burn through one!
Modern OH+S policies dictate certain regimes, but again, even a nurse I spoke to tonight ( fuck me guys if I could get a pic of her you would all cum just looking at it!) said that they get covered in blood- and they deal with drug fucked arseholes all the time.
There are transmission methods, and I think for anyone who has half a brain it is pretty simple:
Mucus membrane to mucus membrane, blood to blood or skin lesion=chance of infection.
Tounge to clit, minimal. Tounge inside vagina - minimal, unless in both cases you have witnesses.
Just cover up!
[QUOTE=Petemcc]Condoms are 100% safe when used properly. [/QUOTE]There is no 100% in the universe!
Think about shaving wounds, scratches or did you use a full body suit? :-))
Cheers,
SAB
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Seems that those "microscopic wounds" still keep you busy :)
Just a side note :
I personally would be very careful giving advice or adjusting my behaviour depending on something that has been written on the web, especially regarding this subject. All sorts of nonsense can be found at the web, there are even websites which claim that unprotected sex is safe or even that HIV/AIDS does not exist at all. You can find a website for any sort of argumentation, so only relying on a webpage can be risky.
I rather stick to the ever valid rule "better safe than sorry".[/QUOTE]
Dealing with probability means that there is never a 0% or 100% probability possible.
Lets just take 2 members:
The sex safety pope The Traveler, is avoiding obviously much more risk then Giotto and many other members in his precautions.
The rock bottom Bareback Creamepie fucker Opebo, who given a chance for cheap pussy below 500 baht somwhere countryside will not at all hesitate satisfy his needs, despite all warnings.
Everybody might agree that the probability to catch aids is much lower for The Traveler then Opebo following Giotto's heavily discussed risk asessment where everybody has its own opinion.
However there is still a remaining (non 0%) risk that The Traveler might catch aids due to some overseen scratch/ other risk he not considered and Opebo not, juist beeing lucky or whyever.
Probability is low, but the risk is clearly there.
Its all about the risk we are willing to take, by 'taking' every plane, car, crossing, women. Every second we do this decisions for life saving. The Traveler is still to risky in some peoples opinion (maybe not member of this board)
regaqrds
Brain666
[QUOTE=Brain666]Lets just take 2 members:
The sex safety pope The Traveler, is avoiding obviously much more risk then Giotto and many other members in his precautions.
The rock bottom Bareback Creamepie fucker Opebo, who given a chance for cheap pussy below 500 baht somwhere countryside will not at all hesitate satisfy his needs, despite all warnings.
Everybody might agree that the probability to catch aids is much lower for The Traveler then Opebo following Giotto's heavily discussed risk asessment where everybody has its own opinion.
However there is still a remaining (non 0%) risk that The Traveler might catch aids due to some overseen scratch/ other risk he not considered and Opebo not, juist beeing lucky or whyever.
[/QUOTE]
Thank you for the notariety. Of course I don't consider my activities excessively risky. Keep in mind that it is safest not to engage in this hobby, but to stay at home and masturbate. Masturbation has the bonus of actually being more fun than plastic sex. As for me, I'll take the real thing.
Aaarrrggghhh... it does not end.
OK.
Correct, there is a lot nonsense written about HIV/AIDS, especially in websites. Whether the website I mentioned here contains shit - everybody might judge by himself, just read it:
[URL]http://www.sfaf.org/aids101/transmission.html[/URL]
And what The Traveler and Opebo are doing - most likely they have their own risk assessment... :) .
BTW, much more interesting: an official HIV infection rate for sex workers published in the Bangkok Post from Monday: [b][size=+2] 10.8 % [/size][/b] . Number from a government agency, don't remember the name in the moment.
Giotto
Had a discussion with one girl from Biergarten last Saturday, during the Ice Hockey event. She gave me a short lesson about HIV/Aids.
She had a friend which had AIDS ("HIV positive"). This friend was married and had (necessarily) a husband. Both never use condoms, and the husband still has no "AIDS" (is still HIV negative).
I asked: "What you want to tell me with that?"
She answered: "They don't use condom, and he not become infected!"
I said: "Wow!"
She looked at me with the knowledge of a teacher!
------
I think I don't have to mention here in this forum that THIS IS DANGEROUS NONSENSE! There are many cases like this described in the internet, and some "horse" doctors support funny theories - but THAT IS RUSSIAN ROULETTE!
[b]Take condoms, guys, ALWAYS.[/b]
Giotto
PS: Side Note: Biergarten is DANGEROUS (in my POV).
[QUOTE=Giotto]
PS: Side Note: Biergarten is DANGEROUS (in my POV).[/QUOTE]
Mr. G:
Only been to Biergarten a couple of times for TG and have been to Gulliver (but for dinner only). But have heard/read that the girls from Biergarten head over to Gulliver later in the evening? If so, that would mean same warning for Gulliver...right?
[QUOTE=Giotto]Had a discussion with one girl from Biergarten last Saturday, during the Ice Hockey event. She gave me a short lesson about HIV/Aids.
She had a friend which had AIDS ("HIV positive"). This friend was married and had (necessarily) a husband. Both never use condoms, and the husband still has no "AIDS" (is still HIV negative).
I asked: "What you want to tell me with that?"
She answered: "They don't use condom, and he not become infected!"
I said: "Wow!"
She looked at me with the knowledge of a teacher!
------
I think I don't have to mention here in this forum that THIS IS DANGEROUS NONSENSE! There are many cases like this described in the internet, and some "horse" doctors support funny theories - but THAT IS RUSSIAN ROULETTE!
[b]Take condoms, guys, ALWAYS.[/b]
Giotto
PS: Side Note: Biergarten is DANGEROUS (in my POV).[/QUOTE]
It's not really russian roulette in my eyes. If she takes her meds regularly her viral load is probably at minute levels in her blood which means it will not be present in her vaginal fluids at all. That is the cold hard fact about HIV certain PC groups try to always dismiss, or base all there findings on certain conclusions with a very limited amount of data behind them. Even if her viral load was high (the onset of infection) it is unlikely to show up in large quantities in her vagina. During her period perhaps but it still would be at a low level and extremely unlikely to be passed to a male partner. FACT not theory.
I will say that this particular woman you are referring to is perhaps putting her husband at a greater risk of transmission than say a man who goes around barebacking random girls (pro or non), because usually (as any doctor who has done extensive research in STDs will tell you) it usually takes multiple exposures to the virus to become infected. FACT not theory.
HIV is and always was a blood borne pathogen, the primary method of transmission is and always has been through blood contact. Semen is the fluid that can also carry it but in less significant quantities. Vaginal fluid has never been scientifically proven to have a comparable level of the virus to the former two. FACT not theory.
[QUOTE=Giotto]Aaarrrggghhh... it does not end.
..........
BTW, much more interesting: an official HIV infection rate for sex workers published in the Bangkok Post from Monday: [b][size=+2] 10.8 % [/size][/b] . Number from a government agency, don't remember the name in the moment.
Giotto[/QUOTE]
This info give us the best chance to probebly forever exchange our risk asessment opinions in judging the %age of girls HIV infected.
Let me start with some examples:
10,8% average of sex workers could give us:
13% Pattaya and 9 % Bangkok average change of beeing affected.
Starting from the 9% Bangkok average rate probably 5 % GoGo Girls (who are sometimes, but not always checked) and 15% Biergarden and 13,5% Gulivers and 2% Giotto's Lodge Sports bar girls and 25% Opepo's favourite girls.
Just for example.
other Polls?
regards
Brain666
[QUOTE=Traveler1234]Mr. G:
Only been to Biergarten a couple of times for TG and have been to Gulliver (but for dinner only). But have heard/read that the girls from Biergarten head over to Gulliver later in the evening? If so, that would mean same warning for Gulliver...right?[/QUOTE]Traveler1234,
If you want my honest opinion - YES! YES! YES! And that is valid for ALL FREELANCER BARS in Thailand, including CM2 and Spasso!
I know that many people don't want to hear that.
Let me tell you a bit about my experiences. I started my mongering in Asia in 1998 in Singapore, Orchard Tower. There are places where freelancers work. A place (Top Ten), where a girl costs S$ 300.00 (and more) for a night (that time MORE THAN THAT!). Top Ten was (now closed) an up-market place in Singapore.
I got into contact with a group if Pattaya working girls, all traveling to Singapore, Hongkong - some of them to Phuket (Banana). I still keep contact to ONE girl of this group ( Nok Noi, a real friend, never slept with her. When she talked about men, she always added: Why are all of them so stupid? ) , who is today 47 years old.
HIV / AIDS has left a deep scar in this group. The sister of my friend died of AIDS a year ago, and so did 4 other members of this group. Another 4 are infected with HIV and need money to buy the American cocktails every month. Some of this group - are not infected, they are the minority!
That is a group of women which were all born in the 70th or early 80th.
- I am dealing with some ignorants here reg. this issue sometimes, which add some high sophisticated "information" - ok, guys, just go ahead. That helps nobody. A realistic view on the facts is needed! -
The sister - I talked to her in Sriracha in 1999, when the infection of one of her friends was suddenly obvious, and I tried to convince her to make a test. Her answer was: " I don't want to know!"
And: "I had so many times sex without condom - those guys don't want to use condoms! I cannot make money if I always insist on condoms! I am scared. I don't want to know!"
[b]She was talking about "those guys" - she talked about YOU (including me). We all don't like condoms. And that's the problem!!! If we like somebody, if we love somebody - we don't want this damned rubber![/b]
She died in 2005. She was a young woman in her 30ties.
- When I wrote about risk assessment in this forum I wanted to help, to give a kind if decision matrix how to evaluate the risk - I know what I wrote, believe me. And if I warned about Biergarten - I know what I do, too.
I know that all that sounds arrogant. AND I DON'T CARE. Because I really know what I am talking about. -
Her sister - I got a phonecall, that she was in a hospital. She could not talk any more, had lost consciousness. That time I was in Singapore. I flew over there, from the airport a taxi to Sriracha. I found here in a hospital, in a huge room together with 100 other patients, nearly dead.
I arranged a transfer for next morning to Pattaya International Hospital. She stayed there for 10 days in intensive care. And I paid for that. AND I KNOW THAT SOMEBODY OUT THERE NOW WANTS TO KNOW: Why did you pay? - Because there was enough money to pay on my bank account...
She had Meningitis that time, one ot the killer infections when the immunization system is down. She survived...but she was blind afterwards.
I met her again 6 month later in her house in Pattaya which a customer had bought for her before. She asked me to help her with the costs of medicaments that time (approx. US $ 900,00 per month). I told her to sell the house, move back to her hometown (somewhere nearby Korat) and buy medicaments from that sales revenues...
Did I mention her Thai boyfriend? A motorbike-taxi driver! I talked to him, too, make a test! "I am sure I am infected - I don't want to know it!"
BTW: We are talking about HIV / AIDS here.
She stayed with her boyfriend in that house, who took care of her, and she never sold that house. The first months after I had met her she still called and asked for money - but then the calls stopped. Until last year, when her sister called me to tell me that the end was near...
I went there, to her house, one last time. She looked like a skeleton, she could hardly talk, and the skin lesions in her face were clearly visible. When she heard my voice she cried. She talked about Singapore, about the life there, her time there, how happy she was, and what misery her life was now. She only wanted to talk about Singapore. And she told me that I was the only one of her old customers who had visited her in the last few years.
She died a few weeks later.
She was a freelancer, beautiful, one of the stunners made for YOU OUT THERE, working in Singapore, Hongkong and Bangkok (sometimes).
I will never forget her. I liked her very much.
[b]Today - I am still HIV-negative because we always used condoms. But she is dead.[/b]
Giotto
Your report was excellent and a big eyeopener, lots of us would get carried away, I know I did this one time, (quite drunk) on that occasion, but yes we gotta wear condoms, if not for us, then for others attached to us.
However, is a condom a real protector, does it ensure 100% protection,
And what about BBBJ, does that affect you too, what about freelancers does one run a greater risk of getting HIV if you sleep with them, I have heard go go bar /massage girls undergo more tests as a routine vis. A vis. Freelancers.
What is your opinion.
BT.
[QUOTE=Giotto]Traveler1234,
If you want my honest opinion - YES! YES! YES! And that is valid for ALL FREELANCER BARS in Thailand, including CM2 and Spasso!
I know that many people don't want to hear that.
Let me tell you a bit about my experiences. I started my mongering in Asia in 1998 in Singapore, Orchard Tower. There are places where freelancers work. A place (Top Ten), where a girl for a night costs S$ 300.00 (and more) for a night (that time MORE THAN THAT!). Top Ten is an up-market place in Singapore.
I got into contact with a group if Pattaya working girls, all traveling to Singapore, Hongkong - some of them to Phuket (Banana). I still keep contact to ONE girl of this group ( Nok Noi, a real friend, never slept with her. When she talked about men, she always added: Why are all of them so stupid? ) , who is today 47 years old.
HIV / AIDS has left a deep scar in this group. The sister of my friend died of AIDS a year ago, and so did 4 other members of this group. Another 4 are infected with HIV and need money to buy the American cocktails every month. Some of this group, the minority - are not infected! (To play with words is a nice game, isn't it??? )
That is a group of women which were all born in the 70th or early 80th.
- I am dealing with some ignorants here reg. this issue sometimes, which add some high sophisticated "information" - ok, guys, just go ahead. That helps nobody. A realistic view on the facts is needed! -
The sister - I talked to her in Sriracha in 1999, when the infection of one of her friends was suddenly obvious, and I tried to convince her to make a test. Her answer was: " I don't want to know!"
And: "I had so many times sex without condom - those guys don't want to use condoms! I cannot make money if I always insist on condoms! I am scared. I don't want to know!"
[b]She was talking about "those guys" - she talked about YOU (including me). We all don't like condoms. And that's the problem!!! If we like somebody, if we love somebody - we don't want this damned rubber![/b]
She died in 2005. She was a young woman in her 30ties.
- When I wrote about risk assessment in this forum I wanted to help, to give a kind if decision matrix how to evaluate the risk - I know what I wrote, believe me. And if I warned about Biergarten - I know what I do, too.
I know that all that sounds arrogant. AND I DON'T CARE. Because I really know what I am talking about. -
Her sister - I got a phonecall, that she was in a hospital. She could not talk any more, had lost consciousness. That time I was in Singapore. I flew over there, from the airport a taxi to Sriracha. I found here in a hospital, in a huge room together with 100 other patients, nearly dead.
I arranged a transfer for next morning to Pattaya International Hospital. She stayed there for 10 days in intensive care. And I paid for that. AND I KNOW THAT SOMEBODY OUT THERE NOW WANTS TO KNOW: Why did you pay? - Because there was enough money to pay on my bank account...
She had Meningitis that time, one ot the killer infections when the immunization system is down. She survived...but she was blind afterwards.
I met her again 6 month later in her house in Pattaya which a customer had bought for her before. She asked me to help her with the costs of medicaments that time (approx. US $ 900,00 per month). I told her to sell the house, move back to her hometown (somewhere nearby Korat) and buy medicaments from that sales revenues...
Did I mention her Thai boyfriend? A motorbyke taxi driver! I talked to him, too, make a test! "I am sure I am infected - I don't want to know it!"
BTW: We are talking about HIV / AIDS here.
She stayed with her boyfriend in that house, who took care of her, and she never sold that house. The first months after I had met her she still called and asked for money - but then the calls stopped. Until last year, when her sister called me to tell me that the end was near...
I went there, to her house, one last time. She looked like a skeleton, she could hardly talk, and the skin lesions in her face were clearly visible. Whe she heard my voice she cried. She talked about Singapore, about the life there, her time there, how happy she was, and what misery her life was now. She only wanted to talk about Singapore.
She died a few weeks later.
She was a freelancer, beautiful, one of the stunners made for YOU OUT THERE, working in Singapore, Hongkong and Bangkok (sometimes).
I will never forget her. I liked her very much.
[b]Today - I am still HIV-negative because we always used condoms. But she is dead.[/b]
Giotto[/QUOTE]
Coincidentally, I wore a condom for the first time in years last night - though only briefly. A more detailed report may soon be found in the 'Other Areas' section.
A girl insisted quite strongly upon one, and a friend had just instructed me in a condom-breaking technique he normally uses. Apparently one 'leaves a bubble at the tip', and then thrusts very vigorously in the doggy style postion before the girl has time to lubricate. He said it regularly works for him, alas not for me. It probably did not help that I was not yet fully rigid - another side effect of condom usage.
However the condom was absurdly small and uncomfortable, and after a few minutes I pulled out and found a way to pursuade the girl to allow bareback. This method involved considerable monetary cost to myself, but it was worth it.
Lastly, even from those few minutes I was reminded how awful those things are - how can you guys not only use them, but travel thousands of miles at considerable expense to fuck a rubber rather than a girl?
[QUOTE=SweetAndBitter]There is no 100% in the universe!
Think about shaving wounds, scratches or did you use a full body suit? :-))
Cheers,
SAB[/QUOTE]
I don't shave my private parts!
[QUOTE=Boy Toy]Your report was excellent and a big eyeopener, lots of us would get carried away, I know I did this one time, (quite drunk) on that occasion, but yes we gotta wear condoms, if not for us, then for others attached to us.
However, is a condom a real protector, does it ensure 100% protection,
And what about BBBJ, does that affect you too, what about freelancers does one run a greater risk of getting HIV if you sleep with them, I have heard go go bar /massage girls undergo more tests as a routine vis. A vis. Freelancers.
What is your opinion.
BT.[/QUOTE]Boy Toy,
The story below is only one of the HIV / AIDS stories I got into contact with during my 10 years here in Asia. There are the other stories of co-workers, friends, staff, neighbors etc. who got infected - somehow.
Today I still read the latest news of the HIV / AIDS science, and I signed up for many news letters. There are better and worse websites, and the mentioned site from the San Francisco AIDS Foundation is one of the best and most informative for an average non-scientist:
[URL]http://www.sfaf.org[/URL]
Some basic statements reg. the questions:
In general the HIV virus is NOT EASY to transfer, it is a huge virus/DNS structure. Other viruses are much more infectious (eg. Hepatitis). For that there are SOME medical scientists who are stating that even unbroken mucous membrane is a sufficient barrier against the virus and does NOT ALLOW an infection, IF the partners are not infected with other STDs(!!).
Nevertheless: There are definitely many cases in which the infection happened in ONE SINGLE UNPROTECTED SEXUAL ACT.
Rule: The mucous membrane MUST BE PROTECTED during intercourse, and that can only be done with a condom (if you want to have intercourse).
A condom secures, if used correctly and if it does not break, a protection of close to 100 %.
[b]Oral sex:[/b]
Generally the risk is minimal, for the receiving person (that is you if you receive a BBBJ) close to zero. The only remaining risk here comes from the possibility that the giving person has blood in his mouth (wounds from toothrush etc. ).
[URL]http://www.sfaf.org/aids101/sexual.html#oral[/URL]
Remaining risk factors are:
- holes / microscopic cuts in the condom
- cuts / wounds in the penis root area
- cuts / wounds at other areas of the normal skin which come into contact with body fluids.
- and others (a long list).
All this remaining risks are so extremely small, that everybody must evaluate for himself whether it is possible and useful to implement measures for a protection against those cases. Those risks are statistically not measurable.
[b][u]Final Statement:[/u] The biggest risk factor are we ourselves, getting carried away during the sexual act and forgetting to use the condom. And afterwards, if the worst case scenario has happened, most of us will definitely NOT tell the truth and insist on the fact, that we always used a condom. Most of us will lie![/b]
Giotto
[QUOTE=Opebo]Coincidentally, I wore a condom for the first time in years last night - though only briefly. A more detailed report may soon be found in the 'Other Areas' section.
A girl insisted quite strongly upon one, and a friend had just instructed me in a condom-breaking technique he normally uses. Apparently one 'leaves a bubble at the tip', and then thrusts very vigorously in the doggy style postion before the girl has time to lubricate. He said it regularly works for him, alas not for me. It probably did not help that I was not yet fully rigid - another side effect of condom usage.
[/QUOTE]
You know I am one of those guys who really doesn't care if a guy wants to go around barebacking fucking, that is really up to you. But what I just read is what really makes my blood boil. If the girl insited on using a condom then you use it, trying methods to break it is criminal and only a low life would do that. That is shameful behaviour and sadly not an uncommon one even in my home Australia. I reckon anyone who whips the condom off or breaks it on purpose should have his dick cut off.
[quote=Jc373]...If the girl insited on using a condom then you use it, trying methods to break it is criminal and [red]only a low life would do that[/red]. That is shameful behaviour and sadly not an uncommon one even in my home Australia. I reckon anyone who whips the condom off or breaks it on purpose should have his dick cut off.[/quote]
I second that. Call it attempted murder. I don't even consider to answer such loosers. I have reported this to Jackson and I hope he will delete it.
[QUOTE=Giotto]... - When I wrote about risk assessment in this forum I wanted to help, to give a kind if decision matrix how to evaluate the risk - I know what I wrote, believe me. And if I warned about Biergarten - I know what I do, too...
[/QUOTE]
Giotto,
I do not question your intentions, but the quality of your advice.
There are far too many factors and circumstances involved for any "rule of thumb" like the ones you provided to us.
You said for example, that a bar girl poses a higher risk than a gogo girl and that a younger girl poses a lower risk than an older one. But you still haven't answered my question if a younger bar girl poses a lower or higher risk than an older gogo girl ? Why did you refrain to answer ?
Did you consider that a younger girl may have more customers than an older one due to being younger and (hopefully) better looking ?
Did you also consider that a younger girl may be less self secure and may allow bareback sex while an older women has enough self confidence and may turn down customers who try to avoid the use of condoms ?
Of course, older women may also be more "desperate" to get a customer, we will never know. We also don't know what those girls will do besides her jobs. Some may work as freelancers, others may just stay at home or taking care of other "serious" business. We also don't know who will avoid the required tests at some gogos (it's quite easy as you know) or how long they are involved in this sort of biz.
Acting based on your assumptions about a girl - without knowing anything about her at all - is not a very smart approach and contains a great deal of cause of fault.
In short, this issue is far too complex for any "rules of engagement" which depend on the age, workplace or any other attribute of the girls. Therefore any advice that relies on those attributes is bad advice and in this context dangerous.
IMHO there is only one way to play the game, expect all girls to bear the same risk and due to that be as careful as you can and treat them all the same.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Giotto,
IMHO there is only one way to play the game, expect all girls to bear the same risk and due to that be as careful as you can and treat them all the same.[/QUOTE]
Spot on. In my professions over the years- police and prison, we used the term 'universal precautions'. That means assume that everyone you come in contact with has a blood bourne infectious disease.
It shouldn't be about risk assessment, it should be about risk minimisation, as the quote says, treat them all the same. Cover up each time, every time. For those of you from the UK in the old days- remember Jimmy Saville- clunk click every trip!
I was going to post a reply to Opebo's posting, but frankly, even after 20 years in law enforcement the man's actions and callous disregard for the health and safety of others disgusts me so much that I would write an essay that would probably get me banned from this forum forever. I have met some cold, calculating, callous evil men in my time, but Opebo, well, I'll leave the inference up to everyone else.
Pete
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Giotto,
...
There are far too many factors and circumstances involved for any "rule of thumb" like the ones you provided to us.
You said for example, that a bar girl poses a higher risk than a gogo girl and that a younger girl poses a lower risk than an older one. But you still haven't answered my question if a younger bar girl poses a lower or higher risk than an older gogo girl ? Why did you refrain to answer ?
...
[/QUOTE]The Traveler,
I did not respond to your question because I am too polite.
The question is not very clever. Just check out what a decision matrix is, and then combine the factors, based on your personal evaluation of each single risk factor. Then you get the combination of the risk factors, and how you personally deal with it.
If you need further information I will explain to you what a decision matrix is, but I think it does not belong here.
Regarding younger girls: I don't really think that we have to discuss that, too. It is a question of logic. Older girls went through the same life period as young girls, and the time period they are older. Logically that can only add risk, but not reduce it. They furthermore lived in a time when the knowledge about HIV was limited - that adds additional risks, too.
I stick to exactly what I wrote in my report. It is my opinion, and you are entitled to have a different one.
Giotto
[QUOTE=The Traveler]
....
IMHO there is only one way to play the game, expect all girls to bear the same risk and due to that be as careful as you can and treat them all the same.[/QUOTE]
We are talking about risk assessment and probability here, but some seem to have their problems with it. As the risk is never 0% and also not 100%, however we calculate it we all mongers take the risk with every girl we take and this includes the Traveler as well.
We can debate endless using the recently published figure if 10,8% aids infection under the sex workers. As I wrote previously it may be 15% at beergarden (or any other number every individual may judge himself) and 6% at the gogo’s and probably still 4% with The Travelers girls selection.
So why to kick Giotto when he is talking about probability, everyone including The Traveler does the same thing.
Consequent at all is only to stay at home and not at all go to Thailand and have contact with any female (regardless engaged in of P4P, or "good girl") there. The traveler is sitting in the glas house himself, as 1 sex act can kill him as anybody of us out there having any females contact as all risks are never 0%.
So why endless debating about the detailed percentage and who gives good and bad advise, when all of us frequent or occasionally doing sex with Thai women take a 'calculated' risk (with our own equation for this 'calculation'), which includes again The Traveler, who has nothing more then just a different calculation to minimize (but never eliminate) his risk.
Even our member Opebo does his risk asessment and considers his barebeck anal shots with his rock bottom candidates low risk, according to his own equasion. So we can see the bandwidth of such individual risk assessment.
Regards
Brain666
[QUOTE=Brain666]... when all of us frequent or occasionally doing sex with Thai women take a 'calculated' risk (with our own equation for this 'calculation'), which includes again The Traveler, who has nothing more then just a different calculation to minimize (but never eliminate) his risk. ...
[/QUOTE]Brain666,
That is the point! I think most of us would definitely second The Travelers final statement - maximum protection, be as careful as you can be.
But the problem is that it is very easy to talk and write about it - and much more difficult to act this way, when you get carried away during a session. We are all human.
The experience I have is that a huge majority of men I spoke to admitted that they already had unprotected intercourse with a P4P girl. To only list all possible risk factors should be an eyeopener. And - as I know today - I even missed a lot of them.
Giotto
[QUOTE=Giotto]
Regarding younger girls: I don't really think that we have to discuss that, too. It is a question of logic. Older girls went through the same life period as young girls, and the time period they are older. Logically that can only add risk, but not reduce it. They furthermore lived in a time when the knowledge about HIV was limited - that adds additional risks, too.
I stick to exactly what I wrote in my report. It is my opinion, and you are entitled to have a different one.[/QUOTE]
Most of us applaud Giotto's good intentions in making his "risk assessment" post. But bad advice is bad advice.
My take is that The Traveler has (quite rightly) pointed out some obvious errors in Giotto's strategy and Giotto has overreacted to that assessment of [i]his[/i] assessment, taking it as a personal attack (and the usual gang of fanboys jumped in, of course, to defend Giotto's honour and attack The Traveler).
Another glaring error, presented as logic: The statement that older prostitutes go through the same "life period" as younger prostitutes. Many of the older prostitutes came into the game at a relatively late age, when their Thai husbands dumped them and left they and their kids 'up Shit Creek without a paddle'.
[QUOTE=Terry Terrier]Most of us applaud Giotto's good intentions in making his "risk assessment" post. But bad advice is bad advice.
My take is that The Traveler has (quite rightly) pointed out some obvious errors in Giotto's risk assessment strategy and Giotto has overreacted to that assessment of [i]his[/i] assessment, taking it as a personal attack (and the usual gang of fanboys jumped in, of course, to defend Giotto's honour and attack The Traveler).
Another glaring error, presented as logic: The statement that older prostitutes go through the same "life period" as younger prostitutes. Many of the older prostitutes came into the game at a relatively late age, when their Thai husbands dumped them and left they and their kids 'up shit creek without a paddle'.[/QUOTE]Terry Terrier,
I really don't know what again the "fanboys" have to do with all that. Shall I now create a virtual "Anti-Fanboys allliance" ? Is that somehow important for the real issue? It is getting more and more obvious for me that some readers out there did not really understand my post about risk assessment up to now.
You are right with one issue, I don't let this risk assessment post problem so easily go, BECAUSE HIV/AIDS is such an important problem, and BECAUSE I really don't want to give wrong advice. But up to now none of your arguments has changed anything in my views. If somebody believes that the fact that I did not discuss the combination of two risk factors makes the risk assessment report erroneous - then he has not understood it! ALL risk factors are combined in the real world!
Your argumentation regarding the possible late entry of older women into the business can fit for some of those ladies, but for sure it does not change the general logic of the age evaluation. It is pure speculation as long as you cannot find out for sure how long a girl is really in the business. Age is something you can find out. It is about RISK ASSESSMENT!
But if you can find this out - then the risk assessment should be changed to a "Duration of Work" factor instead of the "age". That would be more accurate then. I leave it to you and everybody out there to decide for himself in a specific situation whether this is possible or not.
If you people have sex with a full-body condom - fine with me, and highly appreciated. Then you will NOT endanger others, and do good for all participants. I simply don't believe it, I like to have a realistic approach to problems like this. I like to look at the human aspects and weaknesses in such a discussion.
That's it now for me, if somebody wants to discuss this further or has questions reg. my "bad advice" please PM me. I am not willing to discuss this important problem on this irresponsible level embedded in "Fanboys" forum politics and accusations of overreacting.
Giotto
[QUOTE=Giotto]That's it now for me, if somebody wants to discuss this further or has questions reg. my "bad advice" please PM me. I am not willing to discuss this important problem on this irresponsible level embedded in "Fanboys" forum politics and accusations of overreacting. [/QUOTE]
Neither am I, and it's about time you started discouraging your fanboys from giving you their silly, unconditional support. And it's also about time you stopped overreacting and behaving like a prize-winning drama queen in response to legitimate (and accurate) corrections of your assessments. But these two issues are closely linked, if we're being frank, aren't they G?
I will PM you in a couple of days (I'm busy for a day or two), because my replies will require more attention to such a serious issue being raised in such a prima donna style here than that required for the usual BS and fanboy support.
TT (awaiting the sychophantic Giotto's Club 'fanboy' jokes from the fanboys :D)
[Quote=Brain666]...Even our member Opebo does his risk asessment and considers his barebeck anal shots with his rock bottom candidates low risk, according to his own equasion. So we can see the bandwidth of such individual risk assessment...[/QUOTE]The problem with the member whose name I don't even want to put into my mouth is that he is cheating the girls into a possible infection. If Pete's default assumption is that everyone has a blood infection, then one must assume such individuals still much more likely to be infected. And it seems even Jackson doesn't care that criminal acts are promoted here. Very sad.
Tiger
[QUOTE=Tiger 1]The problem with the member whose name I don't even want to put into my mouth is that he is cheating the girls into a possible infection... it seems even Jackson doesn't care that criminal acts are promoted here. Very sad.
Tiger[/QUOTE]
Please explain how this is 'cheating', or how it is criminal. One does not make any false representations - in fact one makes no representations at all. One simply has sex. As far as I know, the act of sex sans condom is not illegal in any jurisdiction, but perhaps that would be a good policy goal for a fan of the Police State to pursue, Tiger.
This whole thread should be void!
[QUOTE=Opebo]Please explain how this is 'cheating', or how it is criminal. One does not make any false representations - in fact one makes no representations at all. One simply has sex. As far as I know, the act of sex sans condom is not illegal in any jurisdiction, but perhaps that would be a good policy goal for a fan of the Police State to pursue, Tiger.[/QUOTE]
Well you said any JURISDICTION (so guess that means anywhere in the world). In which case I can assure you that comment is false, in Australia for one it is illegal in most if not all states to have unprotected paid sex. How anyone would police it, prove it or be convicted of it I don't know but that is the law.
As for the issue at hand it is more one of consent. If a girl consents to BB and thats what you want fill your boots to your hearts consent, that is one for the morals police.
But if a girl, as like the one you posted about asks for a condom and you try methods to deliberatly break it or otherwise conjoule her into not using one then you are a low life. You are the one making a false representation as in that case you would have agreed to the terms the girl offered and choose methods to break that term. That is wrong and I cannot see one sensable or sane argument that could be to the contrary.
At the end of the day if the girl is providing something you don't want (ie the use of a condom) then she is not the girl for you. You seem to have no problem getting it else where so good luck to you, but breaking a condom or doing something else is just shameful.
[QUOTE=Jc373]Well you said any JURISDICTION (so guess that means anywhere in the world). In which case I can assure you that comment is false, in Australia for one it is illegal in most if not all states to have unprotected paid sex. How anyone would police it, prove it or be convicted of it I don't know but that is the law.
As for the issue at hand it is more one of consent. If a girl consents to BB and thats what you want fill your boots to your hearts consent, that is one for the morals police.
But if a girl, as like the one you posted about asks for a condom and you try methods to deliberatly break it or otherwise conjoule her into not using one then you are a low life. You are the one making a false representation as in that case you would have agreed to the terms the girl offered and choose methods to break that term. That is wrong and I cannot see one sensable or sane argument that could be to the contrary.
At the end of the day if the girl is providing something you don't want (ie the use of a condom) then she is not the girl for you. You seem to have no problem getting it else where so good luck to you, but breaking a condom or doing something else is just shameful.[/QUOTE]
Bit like going to the doctor for an injection when he tells you it is a brand new syringe and a brand new needle, only it isn't!
[QUOTE=Jc373]At the end of the day if the girl is providing something you don't want (ie the use of a condom) then she is not the girl for you. You seem to have no problem getting it else where so good luck to you, but breaking a condom or doing something else is just shameful.[/QUOTE]
Point well taken, Jc, and I do agree with you. The reason I related that story was it was the only time I have ever attempted that (it failed). I definitely prefer the more forthright method. You are quite correct that I do not find it particularly difficult to get openly, and that has been, and will be, my policy.
In the case in point it is interesting to note that the girl redily agreed to the bareback sex for an extra 500 baht, and also that her vagina had the distinctive 'fishy' smell - a telltale sign of rotting sperm. So.. it can hardly be argued that I was greatly altering her ordinary practice.
i have many things to say, but jackson has a policy on abusing another member.
so i will say it as politely as i can.
you complete idiot, setting out to purposely break a condom is one of the stupidest things i have ever heard. it is men like you that give the decent clients a bad name. as a working girl i laugh at your ignorance stupidity and totally disregard for your own and your partners safety.
i realise that some working girls are stupid enough to offer this service but god dam it man why would you.
the low level of your intelligence astounds and horrifies me. although somehow i get the feeling that you think this behaviour is amusing and i'll give you that there are plenty of men out there who lack the self confidence and feel that behaving like an ass in the room with a provider makes them more of a man. newsflash, it just makes you look like a sad pathethic man who is incapable of getting erect.
always remember that even wgs have brains and they do have opinions and you would be surprised how tight the wgs grapevine is, you might find yourself in masturbation heaven one day, cause no one will touch it.
good luck, i suppose the one consolation is eventually your dick will go green and drop off. after all thailand is not known for its clean working girls either.
[QUOTE=Opebo]
In the case in point it is interesting to note that the girl redily agreed to the bareback sex for an extra 500 baht, and also that her vagina had the distinctive 'fishy' smell - a telltale sign of rotting sperm. So.. it can hardly be argued that I was greatly altering her ordinary practice.[/QUOTE]
You astound me! You want to put your dick in a pussy filled with rotting sperm? If this isn't disgusting, I wonder what is. But hey, each to his own heaven.
[QUOTE=Opebo]
In the case in point it is interesting to note that the girl redily agreed to the bareback sex for an extra 500 baht, and also that her vagina had the distinctive [size=+1]'fishy' smell - a telltale sign of rotting sperm.[/size] So.. it can hardly be argued that I was greatly altering her ordinary practice.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Opebo] Interestingly, the girl suffered from the fishy-**** smell so common among american providers, but so rare in Thailand. I have noted in my travels that [size=+1]it is usually the condom-pushers who have this smell,[/size] while the girls who hop on bareback without even the mention of a condom are invariably clean and smell great.
[/QUOTE]
Which one is it Opebo?
in one post, you talk about a fishy smell, which according to you, equals rotting sperm. (I have always known thai women to be clean to a fault), in another post, you talk about the fishy smell, which equals condom pushers.
Make up your mind, but regardless of which one it is, your are a fucking idiot, and a complete low life, for trying to intentionally break a condom. If only I had a picture of you, and I knew somehow of a Thai board that all providers read, I would post your photo, and warn all to stay away.
As Sasha Coffee says, masturbation heaven is where you belong.
[QUOTE=Giotto]The Traveler,
I did not respond to your question because I am too polite.
The question is not very clever. Just check out what a decision matrix is, and then combine the factors, based on your personal evaluation of each single risk factor. Then you get the combination of the risk factors, and how you personally deal with it.
If you need further information I will explain to you what a decision matrix is, but I think it does not belong here.
Regarding younger girls: I don't really think that we have to discuss that, too. It is a question of logic. Older girls went through the same life period as young girls, and the time period they are older. Logically that can only add risk, but not reduce it. They furthermore lived in a time when the knowledge about HIV was limited - that adds additional risks, too.
I stick to exactly what I wrote in my report. It is my opinion, and you are entitled to have a different one.
Giotto[/QUOTE]
Giotto,
please stick to the issue, don't fall back into old habits, there is no need to get personal and being condescending.
BTW, that's what Terry is complaining about.
So why you do still avoid to give a clear answer ?
You mentioned several attributes and the risk attached to them due to YOUR risk assesment. Sadly you didn't give us any information which attribute contains the higher risk. That's what my question was aiming for.
It shows your dilemma that your rules are worthless because the whole issue is far too complex. All those attributes can be combined endlessly (plus many many others not mentioned) and who can really claim to be able to assess or even estimate the actual risks involved.
Any attempt to do that - like you did with your risk assessment - is a lost cause. By sticking to it, you do lie to yourself which is much worse than lying to others.
So my question still stands : who bears the bigger risk, an old gogo girl or a young bar girl ?
I also kindly ask you to explain your answer/decision.
P.S. Waste a second and think about what Pete said. Guess why professionals like policemen, medical personal and first aid workers have certain rules of behaviour when approaching unknown people with an unknown health status. Those professionals have to deal with unknown people, we do it by choice, but that doesn't mean that we should unnecessarily increase our risk just because we BELIEVE or ASSUME something about those people.
[QUOTE=Paulothai]STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP !!!!!!!!
This behaviour is lower then low, ridicolous, idiot behaviour !!!
STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP !!!!!!!!
Opebo if you cannot find a wife then buy a plastic doll, but
never ever do it with anybody else without using protection
STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP !!!!!!!!
Also do not post in this thread as this thread is about SAFE SEX !
STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP !!!!!!!!
You are so cheap and making use of the poverty of the girls as
you know they need the money. You are soooooooo cheap !!!
STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP !!!!!!!!
Guys like you are the reason that all kind of STD are spreading.
Eventualy you will destroy your own dick and your own life, but
how many girls and families will die for your irresponsible pleasure.
STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP !!!!!!!!
Do you realize that you are just a client and that because of you
the next client is at a great risk....Yeah, this is called serial ...... !
How many of us will be infected by the STD's you are spreading.
STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP !!!!!!!!
How many lifes you want to destroy. I hope you realize and think
of this post when you fuck your next victim.......Yeah VICTIM !!!
If you have any brain in your head......then use it...... S T O P
your irresponsible behaviour immediatly immediatly immediatly.
STOP STOP STOP STOP STOP !!!!!!!!
Once again get married or buy a plastic doll....fuck as you wish !
With any other sexual contacts.......ALWAYS USE PROTECTION !
This way you protect the girl...her family/kids....the next client !
.[/QUOTE] Paulo - your last line says Opebo should wear a condom to protect the next client. Sorry, I don't agree. The next client should wear a condom to protect himself - then he doesn't have to worry about what the previous client did. It's that simple.
I don't know if Opebo (or his brother Bareback Bill) are serious, but there are guys around like that. Just in case, I always use condoms. I really don't want to share their body fluids.
[QUOTE=Paulothai]Hi Terry,
This is a very serious, important issue and you are totaly out of line when you only bring comment and attack Giotto.
Giotto contributes great content to the ISG with his reports about the different issues. Giotto also gave his opinion in a great report (content) about this serious subject.
The Traveller showed us his different view (content) in his post.
Bottomline and intention of both is in their advice : SAFE SEX !!!
Keep in mind they both do not pretend to have the ultimate wisdom !
Terry.......just read.....think.....and stop with your comment (fanclub, attack Giotto). You only discourage these experienced guys to share their wisdom, which in many ways is very valuable for all of us. They deserve (y)our respect !
..
.[/QUOTE]
Paulothai,
with all due respect, but please read Giotto's reply to my post again.
It contains several (not so hidden) attacks and is very condescending.
Last time he did the very same thing, jumped from one issue to another one, tried to make fun out of me and insulted me. He even dared to question my character instead of answering my factual question. I responded by questioning his character and only his "fanclub" saved his ass - and allowed him to keep face - by distracting from the issue.
Sadly he already fell back into those old habits, forgetting his own lengthy post about the development of discussions and the wrongdoing of their participants He also had set up rules but they only seem to be valid for others, not for him.
That's what Terry is complaining about and he only mentioned it to refresh Giotto's memory as he already showed the same behaviour again.
Such behaviour is usually the last resort for people who are cornered and ran out of arguments.
I won't refer to it anymore and try to ignore his misbehaviour as good as I can. Such things belong to the fight club. But nevertheless I hope that Giotto will only stick to facts and will be able to overcome his "bad habits". I think we are two mature adults who should be able to discuss a serious issue with the seriousness it deserves.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Paulothai,
with all due respect, but please read Giotto's reply to my post again.
It contains several (not so hidden) attacks and is very condescending.
Last time he did the very same thing, jumped from one issue to another one, tried to make fun out of me and insulted me. He even dared to question my character instead of answering my factual question. I responded by questioning his character and only his "fanclub" saved his ass - and allowed him to keep face - by distracting from the issue.
Sadly he already fell into those old habits, forgetting his own lengthy post about the development of discussions and the wrongdoing of their participants He also had set up rules but they only seem to be valid for others, not for him.
That's what Terry is complaining about and he only mentioned it to refresh Giotto's memory as he already showed the same behaviour again.
Such behaviour is usually the last resort for people who are cornered and ran out of arguments.
I won't refer to it anymore and try to ignore his misbehaviour as good as I can. Such things belong to the fight club. But nevertheless I hope that Giotto will only stick to facts and will be able to overcome his "bad habits". I think we are two mature adults who should be able to discuss a serious issue with the seriousness it deserves.[/QUOTE]TT - is this thread about crying about you and Giotto, or about safe sex? Sheesh!!! C'mon - you're better than that.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Enough, any reply regarding this issue should be posted in the "Fight Club".[/QUOTE]No need for me to reply in the fight club. I'm not fighting. I'm a lover not a fighter. :) Yes, Giotto is a friend, but this doesn't mean you're an enemy. I've invited you for a drink (and an arm-wrestle!) more than once. I'll speak on behalf of Giotto without his permission - he has no problems with you arriving at the lodge for a drink and a laugh. In person, people are very different.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]
That's what Terry is complaining about and he only mentioned it to refresh Giotto's memory as he already showed the same behaviour again.
Such behaviour is usually the last resort for people who are cornered and ran out of arguments.
[/QUOTE]
First, I think a lot of which is being said should be moved over to the fight club. Everyone knows my 'position' re both G and The Traveler, enough said on that.
Second, safe sex is a critical issue and everyone has their own opinions - no reason why we can't discuss them in an intelligent manner without making personal attacks. Not everyone may agree with G's perspective, including me. Argue re the subject, not against the messenger.
Third, I do agree with earlier posts - it's easier to attack someone's views, and it's more difficult to argue and/or present a fresh perspective.
[QUOTE=Paulothai]Hi Piper1,
... there is always a risk
and this is a big .....BIG.... risk when you "meet" an Opebo pussy.
...and what
about your mouth when meeting her pussy.
This cheap Opebo....brainless ?...irresponsible behaviour is the
reason of spreading soooo much terrible destroying things........
He sure is not one of US and does not belong here !!!!!!!!
.[/QUOTE]
Paulo, you are making an agregious error in assuming that any dangers you face come from other occidental mongers daring to bareback. No, if you thought seriously about the subject at all you would know that the girls' main risk factors are not some middle aged first world visitors, but their own native boyfriends and customers, and/or drugs use. Certainly my using a condom will not alter any girl's risk assessment.
There is nothing 'brainless' about a considered, reasoned decision that 1) the risk level is really not that high, and 2) one is not going to live forever anyway! There is something truly comically absurd about old men traveling thousands of miles to have sex with a rubber device rather than a girl, in order to preserve a life which is already nearing the end of its remotely enjoyable phase.
I have often seen this mentality - it is a very american one - in which persons operate under the assumption that they will live forever. Do you not ride in automobiles? Perhaps even occasionally on a motorbike? Then why not enjoy real sex? It is no more dangerous. I believe many avoid even very minor sexual risks due to prudery - a feeling that risk occasioned in the pursuit of pleasure is inherently shameful or embarrassing.
As far as not belonging here, I think you may be mistaken about who and what [b]you[/b] are, brother.
Opebo - Please show us you can learn and respond to this.
Do you know Pamela Anderson caught Hep C from sex with her husband? - it's incurable and means she has a higher chance of Liver Cancer.
You can catch and spread Heb B sexually - the same way.
You've obviously never heard of HPV - dozens of strains, which are incurable, some of which cause cervical cancer in women and recurring warts or inflammation on your dick.
Maybe you have AIDS and your are trying to spread HIV to the rest of us via poor Asian WG's.
You've probably never heard of drug resistant strains of Gonoreea, Syphilis and Chalmydia or 9 different fungal infections you are spreading.
Maybe you can't read the packages of the different barnds of condoms out there.
QUOTE FROM RECENT BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL: "In Thailand, the HIV epidemic has spread over time to the sexual partners of vulnerable groups and in 2005 the majority of new infections occurred among the low risk heterosexual population (43%). Men having sex with men accounted for 21% and sex work (including sex workers, clients, and partners of clients) for 18% of new infections."
JOURNAL OF SEXUALITY AND DISABILITY: "Female prostitution is a major factor relating to human immuno deficiency virus (HIV) infection and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among Thais. A number of sexually active Thai males have experience on getting contact with a female prostitute; therefore, health education for Thais since they are young is recommended. Apart from HIV and STDs, prostitution is also related to hepatitis and cervical cancer in Thailand."
OPEBO - WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY?
[QUOTE=Alex Rock]
OPEBO - WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO SAY?[/QUOTE]
My decisions are fully informed, Alex, merely different from your own (and of course none of your affair). I would say this however - if one wishes to avoid all risk, a more effective and enjoyable method would be to stay at home and masturbate, not have miserable third rate 'sex' at great expense with a rubber device which removes all enjoyment from the act.
You are sick in the head and probably in your body. I hope you get what you deserve
[QUOTE=Opebo]My decisions are fully informed, Alex, merely different from your own (and of course none of your affair). I would say this however - if one wishes to avoid all risk, a more effective and enjoyable method would be to stay at home and masturbate, not have miserable third rate 'sex' at great expense with a rubber device which removes all enjoyment from the act.[/QUOTE]SEE THE DEFINITION OF RECKLESS BELOW - I ASSUME YOU AGREE THAT DESCRIBES YOU - SINCE YOU ARE INFORMED AND MAKE YOUR CHOICE
Deliberate (or 'Intentional')
Most countries would consider this to be the most serious offence that can be committed. Some cases of deliberate transmission have involved individuals (both HIV+ and HIV-) who have used needles or other implements to intentionally infect others with HIV. Others have been based on HIV+ people who have had sex with the primary purpose of transmitting the virus to their partner.
Deliberate transmission also sometimes takes place when a negative partner has an active desire to become infected with HIV (a practice sometimes referred to as 'sexual thrill seeking' or 'bug chasing'). This is unlikely to lead to prosecution however as both parties consent.
Reckless
This is where HIV is passed on through a careless rather than deliberate act. If for example a person who knows they have HIV has unprotected sex with a negative person, but fails to inform them of the risk involved, this could be classed as reckless transmission in court. "Reckless' here implies that transmission did take place, but that this happened as part of the pursuit of sexual gratification rather than because the HIV+ person actually wanted to give their partner HIV (HIV is of course not 'automatically' transmitted every time someone has unprotected sex.)
Accidental
This is the most common way that HIV is passed on. A person is generally said to have accidentally transmitted HIV if:
They unaware that they had the virus, and therefore did not feel the need to take measures to protect their partner.
They were aware of their HIV+ status and they used a condom during sex, but the condom failed in some way (although there is some debate over whether this should in fact be classed as a reckless act, as we shall see later).
[QUOTE=Opebo]Paulo, you are making an agregious error in assuming that any dangers you face come from other occidental mongers daring to bareback. No, if you thought seriously about the subject at all you would know that the girls' main risk factors are not some middle aged first world visitors, but their own native boyfriends and customers, and/or drugs use. Certainly my using a condom will not alter any girl's risk assessment.[/QUOTE]
Sure you may have a point in that your danger is not necessarily coming from occidental mongers who bareback. But consider what you just said here: the girls' risk factor are their own bf's and customers. And infected women do pass STDs to men. By barebacking these girls, you are joining their risk pool in which infection and transmission rates are quite high. Do you really believe you're immune to getting anything from an infected provider?
[QUOTE=Opebo]There is nothing 'brainless' about a considered, reasoned decision that 1) the risk level is really not that high and 2) one is not going to live forever anyway! There is something truly comically absurd about old men traveling thousands of miles to have sex with a rubber device rather than a girl, in order to preserve a life which is already nearing the end of its remotely enjoyable phase.[/QUOTE]
Risk level is not that high, eh? In fact, you may already be infected, passing it around and not know it. At least have enough respect for yourself and your fellow mongers, both Thai and occidental, to get tested. And that last statement exhibits a considerable lack of respect for the providers who represent the other side of the mongering coin. For they are the other half of us...
[QUOTE=Opebo]I have often seen this mentality - it is a very american one - in which persons operate under the assumption that they will live forever. Do you not ride in automobiles? Perhaps even occasionally on a motorbike? Then why not enjoy real sex? It is no more dangerous. I believe many avoid even very minor sexual risks due to prudery - a feeling that risk occasioned in the pursuit of pleasure is inherently shameful or embarrassing.[/QUOTE]
Prudery isn't the word that applies to the rest of us, it's prudence.
[QUOTE=Opebo]As far as not belonging here, I think you may be mistaken about who and what [b]you[/b] are, brother.[/QUOTE]
You certainly belong here with us, we are all mongers. But a little respect for life goes a long way even if you never see that girl again. You speak often of brothers, of going along to get along, of not making waves, yet you contradict yourself. By infecting those girls, you help them and their communities to show the farangs less goodwill in the long run. How selfish of you to sacrifice the rest of us on your altar. And pray tell, how is that good for the rest of us mongers in general?
you think you are informed and if you catch hiv or other std's from girls, that's your own chosen risk and destiny.
you are clearly not informed when it comes to other people's rights or the transmission of stds.
don't you think that the girls you are trying to spread diseases to should have their choice? if you pay extra for the bareback experience and the girls willingly accept your cash, that is one thing, but you must agree you are being dishonest and cheating them by risking their health when you deliberately break your condoms.? you have deliberately broken your agreement with them. it's the same as [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord123][CodeWord123][/url] - but from your personality it seems you might like that.
you talk about driving an automobile or a motorbike and say why not try "real sex". would you want us all to drive our cars at 100mph in a school street? or to speed our motorbikes around a pedestrian mall? and risk hurting other people. you talk like you'd carry a loaded gun, but because you are informed it can hurt you, you think that pointing it away from you is ok for your own safety. you can't you see your behaviour is harmful to others?
if i prick you with an hiv infected needle - and don't give you a choice - how do you feel? you are not giving those girls a choice. are you?
if you are informed, you should know you might already have caught hiv from girls who were as you say "put at risk by their boyfriends, customers or drug users" and you still go around putting yourself at risk and every girl you screw.
[quote=alex rock]
don't you think that the girls you are trying to spread diseases to should have their choice? if you pay extra for the bareback experience and the girls willingly accept your cash, that is one thing, but you must agree you are being dishonest and cheating them by risking their health when you deliberately break your condoms.? you have deliberately broken your agreement with them. it's the same as [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord123][CodeWord123][/url] - but from your personality it seems you might like that.
[/quote]
alex, i prefer not to clutter up this thread with a never ending argument - i only respond to correct a factual error: if you had read my posts carefully you would find that i only attempted the condom-breaking once, and failed. as i said in the relevant post, i had not even worn one of those awful things in years! my practice has normally been to persuade (though in many cases even this is not necessary).
so, let that be the end of your critique of a one-time aberration on my part - i have already stated that i do not intend to attempt it again. if you desire to attack me further, please do so on in the fight club thread.
[QUOTE=Paulothai]My question to you: What is witholding you to make your own report
with your view (content) on this serious matter ?
.[/QUOTE]
Paulo,
IMO The only good advice is the standard STI clinic advice. Which is to use condoms for all penetration and avoid the exchange of bodily fluids wherever possible.
I and many others on ISG don't always stick tightly to those guidelines (my own weakness is for receiving uncovered oral, a weakness that was once exposed by catching a dose of the clap). But these are personal behaviours and risks that consenting adults decide to make. I would not try to present mine to Joe Public as being almost risk-free in the right circumstances.
[QUOTE=Giotto]Traveler1234,
If you want my honest opinion - YES! YES! YES! And that is valid for ALL FREELANCER BARS in Thailand, including CM2 and Spasso!
I know that many people don't want to hear that.
Let me tell you a bit about my experiences. I started my mongering in Asia in 1998 in Singapore, Orchard Tower. There are places where freelancers work. A place (Top Ten), where a girl costs S$ 300.00 (and more) for a night (that time MORE THAN THAT!). Top Ten was (now closed) an up-market place in Singapore.
I got into contact with a group if Pattaya working girls, all traveling to Singapore, Hongkong - some of them to Phuket (Banana). I still keep contact to ONE girl of this group ( Nok Noi, a real friend, never slept with her. When she talked about men, she always added: Why are all of them so stupid? ) , who is today 47 years old.
HIV / AIDS has left a deep scar in this group. The sister of my friend died of AIDS a year ago, and so did 4 other members of this group. Another 4 are infected with HIV and need money to buy the American cocktails every month. Some of this group - are not infected, they are the minority!
That is a group of women which were all born in the 70th or early 80th.
- I am dealing with some ignorants here reg. this issue sometimes, which add some high sophisticated "information" - ok, guys, just go ahead. That helps nobody. A realistic view on the facts is needed! -
The sister - I talked to her in Sriracha in 1999, when the infection of one of her friends was suddenly obvious, and I tried to convince her to make a test. Her answer was: " I don't want to know!"
And: "I had so many times sex without condom - those guys don't want to use condoms! I cannot make money if I always insist on condoms! I am scared. I don't want to know!"
[b]She was talking about "those guys" - she talked about YOU (including me). We all don't like condoms. And that's the problem!!! If we like somebody, if we love somebody - we don't want this damned rubber![/b]
She died in 2005. She was a young woman in her 30ties.
- When I wrote about risk assessment in this forum I wanted to help, to give a kind if decision matrix how to evaluate the risk - I know what I wrote, believe me. And if I warned about Biergarten - I know what I do, too.
I know that all that sounds arrogant. AND I DON'T CARE. Because I really know what I am talking about. -
Her sister - I got a phonecall, that she was in a hospital. She could not talk any more, had lost consciousness. That time I was in Singapore. I flew over there, from the airport a taxi to Sriracha. I found here in a hospital, in a huge room together with 100 other patients, nearly dead.
I arranged a transfer for next morning to Pattaya International Hospital. She stayed there for 10 days in intensive care. And I paid for that. AND I KNOW THAT SOMEBODY OUT THERE NOW WANTS TO KNOW: Why did you pay? - Because there was enough money to pay on my bank account...
She had Meningitis that time, one ot the killer infections when the immunization system is down. She survived...but she was blind afterwards.
I met her again 6 month later in her house in Pattaya which a customer had bought for her before. She asked me to help her with the costs of medicaments that time (approx. US $ 900,00 per month). I told her to sell the house, move back to her hometown (somewhere nearby Korat) and buy medicaments from that sales revenues...
Did I mention her Thai boyfriend? A motorbike-taxi driver! I talked to him, too, make a test! "I am sure I am infected - I don't want to know it!"
BTW: We are talking about HIV / AIDS here.
She stayed with her boyfriend in that house, who took care of her, and she never sold that house. The first months after I had met her she still called and asked for money - but then the calls stopped. Until last year, when her sister called me to tell me that the end was near...
I went there, to her house, one last time. She looked like a skeleton, she could hardly talk, and the skin lesions in her face were clearly visible. When she heard my voice she cried. She talked about Singapore, about the life there, her time there, how happy she was, and what misery her life was now. She only wanted to talk about Singapore. And she told me that I was the only one of her old customers who had visited her in the last few years.
She died a few weeks later.
She was a freelancer, beautiful, one of the stunners made for YOU OUT THERE, working in Singapore, Hongkong and Bangkok (sometimes).
I will never forget her. I liked her very much.
[b]Today - I am still HIV-negative because we always used condoms. But she is dead.[/b]
Giotto[/QUOTE]I can add. Since I am in Thailand for business I lost around 16 good bar girl friend from beergarten. Heidelberg Bar restaurant and thaerme. Dead aids. The lastest one was my best body and friend since 1992 HE got aids from a former girl friend. He is gone last December but he never told me he was infected. In fact I was always asked him why he loose weight and his hair! But we never Talked about this during our rounds. Doctor told me in hospital! Officialy he is dead from a stroke is was 46 leaving Bangkok since.
It is so sad that people are still ignorant to the risks of not using condoms.
Being a child of the 80s when AIDS first hit the headlines we grew up and entered out teenage years with the understanding that condoms were a necissity, much like don't drink and drive. They were just part of your life.
Now as a working girl they are part of mine daily.
I am lucky I have never known or had anyone close to me die of AIDS but part of that is New Zealand has remained relatively untouched. We are lucky.
For those of you that take risks with your own health and endanger other peoples lives purposely by not using condoms. It is about time the governments of the world began charging you with Murder. You are reckless and incredibly stupid.
I wait with a smirk on my face till the day one of you have to go home to your wives and children and tell them you had unprotected sex and now have AIDS, I wait smirking while your wife has to be tested only to find out you have passed it on to her. I wait while your children realise that their parents will die and leave them orphans, I wait while your grand children will never know the thrill of grand parents. I wait while your children face the stigma of having AIDS infected parents and being traumatised and ostrascized by their friends. I wait and smirk while your own friends and colleagues drift away from you. I wait and smirk while you sit there wondering which working girl it was who gave you this disease. I wait and smirk while you wish you had taken the necessary precautions.
I wait and wonder when you will learn.
Giotto,
I repeat my question and kindly ask you to answer it :
Who poses a higher risk, a young bar girl or an older gogo girl ?
You told us in your risk assessment that
an older women poses a higher risk than a younger one
a freelancer does pose a higher risk than a bargirl
a bargirl poses a higher risk than a gogo girl.
I don't know what your "decision matrix" will tell you if you mix any of your mentioned attributes (e.g. age, workplace etc.).
I also wonder what your "decision matrix" will tell you about gogo girls who also do work as freelancers. Since you met those girls in a gogo and do not know anything about their freelancing activities, do they still fall into the "gogo girl" or in the "freelance" category ?
So should we put all girls into the "freelance" category because any girl could possibly also do freelance without telling us ?
I am a bit confused and still don't fully understand how your "workplace rule" works.
Please answer to explain it to me and clarify the current situation.
But if you prefer to avoid a straight answer to a straight question we all do know the reason for it. :)
[QUOTE=Jeff46]The lastest one was my best body and friend since 1992 QUOTE] Then there is the substantial gay element to be factored into the decision matrix. What if the older street lady can only fuck cheap Charlie but the young go go girl does threesomes and more somes with ladyboys and Boyztown hookers.
The fact is Giotto's decision matrix is one of the most irresponsible pieces of crap on this entire site. Now that Giotto is on the defensive, he has to wheel out personal anecdotes about Singapore in 1998. Whatever happened to all those learned books he read on the subject?
The contribution of Giotto and Phoenix Dave on this issue both constitute a grave threat to your health. Giotto's seems to display a lack of basic knoweldge of the industry as well. The same lady can be a bar girl, a go go dancer and a freelancer in a very short time. Notoriously, go go girls have to fuck all comers and some ladies vote with their feet by walking the streets where they have more control. Giotto's advice is so bad it should be ignored if it were not so dangerous.
Obepo has come in for some stick. But his reports are useful in that they show how prevalent barebacking is and, as a consequence, how useless Giotto's advice is.
Giotto,
your attempt to move it to PM failed, not only because your PM box is full so I can't answer that way, but mostly because you still avoid a clear answer to a very simple question.
Your refusal to answer is nothing but a confession that your "risk assessment" (and of course your "decision matrix") is complete crap as Martian called it.
Why not enlighten us by telling us what your decision matrix tells you in such a case ?
Don't forget, refusing to answer is also an answer and we all know your reason why.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]
I also wonder what your "decision matrix" will tell you about gogo girls who also do work as freelancers. Since you met those girls in a gogo and do not know anything about their freelancing activities, do they still fall into the "gogo girl" or in the "freelance" category ?
So should we put all girls into the "freelance" category because any girl could possibly also do freelance without telling us ?
[/QUOTE]
Hmmm,
my decision Matrix (not Giotto's) is simply that it is added risk if a gogo girl is additionally going as a freelancer. Still in the average (which means that there is no evidence and if you are unlucky your %tage case is just the opposite of average), the GoGo girl with additional freelance activities may still be lower risk then the 'only' freelancer, as the GoGo's In average get more duty health check then the average freelancer.
But again, as it is statistics you can never be sure if your single case is part of the average, as well as you can't tell if your next plane home isn't just the one that is brought down by the next terrorist attack. But I agree that the Risk having a GoGo girl Aids Infected is signifficantly higher then that your plane is shot down. But not 0 as The Traveler will argue the same as me.
Again, risk as essment is risk asessment and the ramaining risk is never 0.
My 2 Freelancers from beergarden have been Condom insisters and asked if I had condom much before we arrived in the room, in fact before we closed the deal. Also this Risk was not 0, but considered lower then probably the average Freelancer. But who knows. I took the risk according to my own calibrated decision matrix as every monger does with each single session he does - including The Traveler.
regards
Brain666
PS: Some people ignore how statistics works. Risk simply never 0. I am living in South Korea now. So my risk of getting hit by an Atomic Bomb from the north is probably higher then for every monger in Thailand. However I consider that the statistical risk for the Japenese is even higher.
.... And so on and so on ....
[QUOTE=The Traveler]
Don't forget, refusing to answer is also an answer ....[/QUOTE]
TT: congratulations on hitting the 2,550 post mark. I'm trying ... don't think will ever catch up :D
"I repeat my question and kindly ask you to answer it :
Who poses a higher risk, a young bar girl or an older gogo girl ?"
Traveller, here is my own decision matrix:
"If it spreads its legs and fucks for money, it is not safe. Bar Girl or Gogo Girl; no difference."
[QUOTE=Merlin Magician]"I repeat my question and kindly ask you to answer it :
Who poses a higher risk, a young bar girl or an older gogo girl ?"
Traveller, here is my own decision matrix:
"If it spreads its legs and fucks for money, it is not safe. Bar Girl or Gogo Girl; no difference."[/QUOTE]
Probably Giotto is asked here,
but my decision matrix is, that I would probably never consider an older GoGo girl anyhow, when there are so much junger GoGo girls to choose from. So the young Bargirl would be the choice not reflecting other factors in the decision matrix which could prevent me from.
Again: Its a decision Matrix with many factors. So picking a special case and reducing to 2 decisions isn't really a matrix. So the example isn't what happens in reality when we choose our favourite girl.
regards
Brain666
[QUOTE=Merlin Magician]"I repeat my question and kindly ask you to answer it :
Who poses a higher risk, a young bar girl or an older gogo girl ?"
Traveller, here is my own decision matrix:
"If it spreads its legs and fucks for money, it is not safe. Bar Girl or Gogo Girl; no difference."[/QUOTE]
I don't think it matters given the consequences. Even if it fucks for free. Condoms are what, 10 baht? How much is a lifetime of AIDS treatments?
[QUOTE=Giotto]Some basic statements reg. the questions:
In general the HIV virus is NOT EASY to transfer, it is a huge virus/DNS structure. Other viruses are much more infectious (eg. Hepatitis). For that there are SOME medical scientists who are stating that even unbroken mucous membrane is a sufficient barrier against the virus and does NOT ALLOW an infection, IF the partners are not infected with other STDs(!!).
Nevertheless: There are definitely many cases in which the infection happened in ONE SINGLE UNPROTECTED SEXUAL ACT.
Rule: The mucous membrane MUST BE PROTECTED during intercourse, and that can only be done with a condom (if you want to have intercourse).
A condom secures, if used correctly and if it does not break, a protection of close to 100 %.
[b]Oral sex:[/b]
Generally the risk is minimal, for the receiving person (that is you if you receive a BBBJ) close to zero. The only remaining risk here comes from the possibility that the giving person has blood in his mouth (wounds from toothrush etc. ).
[URL]http://www.sfaf.org/aids101/sexual.html#oral[/URL]
Remaining risk factors are:
- holes / microscopic cuts in the condom
- cuts / wounds in the penis root area
- cuts / wounds at other areas of the normal skin which come into contact with body fluids.
- and others (a long list).
All this remaining risks are so extremely small, that everybody must evaluate for himself whether it is possible and useful to implement measures for a protection against those cases. Those risks are statistically not measurable.
[b][u]Final Statement:[/u] The biggest risk factor are we ourselves, getting carried away during the sexual act and forgetting to use the condom. And afterwards, if the worst case scenario has happened, most of us will definitely NOT tell the truth and insist on the fact, that we always used a condom. Most of us will lie![/b]
Giotto[/QUOTE]
Giotto,
Thanks for cold clinical scientific data with risk probability assessment.
I get so sick of those who either wish to remain blissfully ignorant or the opposites who have wildly emotional reactions to some so called 'risks' not based on any science whatsoever.
Life is risky, its just about keeping the risks to sensible controlled levels and still enjoying life.
Micky like Licky
[QUOTE=Traveler1234]TT: congratulations on hitting the 2,550 post mark. I'm trying ... don't think will ever catch up :D[/QUOTE]
T1234,
thanks but I didn't even recognized it. I never look at the post counters.
Why should I, it has absolutely no significance.
[QUOTE=Brain666]Probably Giotto is asked here,
but my decision matrix is, that I would probably never consider an older GoGo girl anyhow, when there are so much junger GoGo girls to choose from. So the young Bargirl would be the choice not reflecting other factors in the decision matrix which could prevent me from.
Again: Its a decision Matrix with many factors. So picking a special case and reducing to 2 decisions isn't really a matrix. So the example isn't what happens in reality when we choose our favourite girl.
regards
Brain666[/QUOTE]
Brain666,
you somehow constantly miss the point.
Giotto made several statements and presented guidelines, saying that risk depends on age, workplace and a couple of other things.
This is quite shallow IMO. The whole thing is far too complex to be reduced to a couple of factors as we don't know anything about the providers. You should know very well that I restricted it to only 2 factors to keep it simple. I gave a couple of explanations why a younger girl could pose a higher risk than an older one opposite to Giotto's risk assessment. I also provided a few examples/reasons why a gogo girl can pose a much higher risk than a bar girl even though Giotto tries to tell us that gogo girls are less risky than bar girls.
In short, we have absolutely no way to tell how risky an unknown sex partner is. Therefore we should treat them all the same.
Guess why Giotto still refuses to answer my simple question ?
If his risk assessment already fails on the combination of 2 of his factors, how good will it work in real life ?
So far your objections/remarks only targeted our decision to pick a girl or not which is pointless, as this isn't subject of the discussion.
Giotto's advice points into a complete different direction. He told us, that he will be more or less careful or better careless depending on his assumptions about a person. He calls those assumptions "decision matrix" but they are nothing but assumptions as he doesn't know anything about the girls in question, especially nothing about their health status, preferred sexual practices and partners and so on. Therefore his risk assessment is completely use- and worthless.
If you decide to have sex with an unknown partner be as careful as possible, don't differentiate and don't believe that one may be more or less risky. Don't lie to yourself !
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Brain666,
you somehow constantly miss the point....................................
[/QUOTE]
Traveler, could you please take this to the Fight Club thread. It's between you and Giotto. I am sorry, but we all seem to miss the finer points of your argument about Giotto's staement. So take it to the Fight Club and thrash it out there.
[QUOTE=Duniawala]we all seem to miss the finer points of your argument about Giotto's staement. So take it to the Fight Club [/QUOTE]
I don't, and I know that others don't.
The Fight club is about having fun and letting off steam. The Traveler is trying to have a serious discussion about safe sex in Thailand in the Safe Sex in Thailand thread. If you want to take the [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] out of The Traveler, do so in the Fight Club or those threads dedicated to Giotto and his clients.
Ontopic,
Am I to assume that a woman fresh and new to the prostitution scene in a farang-oriented tourist sector of Thailand has never worked in the (predominantly bareback) Thai-oriented prostitution scene in her home region? What indicators/guidelines should I use to decide how safe my sex should be with such women?
I think discussion of what activities are risky or not so risky is far more worthwhile than debating whether one girl is more risky than another.
If the right precautions are taken the girl's background history becomes an insignificant factor which is just as well since we will never know what the background is for a new aquantaince.
Any normal girl is a high risk if she has ever had unprotected sex in the few months before her last blood test (or anytime after) if she had one.
Now all of that is really unknown, ain't it.
Am I feeling lucky today, punk? (Sorry Clint)
Better to protect all risky activities. I don't beleive in luck.
Shit happens all the time.
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]I think discussion of what activities are risky or not so risky is far more worthwhile than debating whether one girl is more risky than another.
If the right precautions are taken the girl's background history becomes an insignificant factor which is just as well since we will never know what the background is for a new aquantaince.
Any normal girl is a high risk if she has ever had unprotected sex in the few months before her last blood test (or anytime after) if she had one.
Now all of that is really unknown, ain't it.
Am I feeling lucky today, punk? (Sorry Clint)
Better to protect all risky activities. I don't beleive in luck.
Shit happens all the time.[/QUOTE]
Spot on mate.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Brain666,
I gave a couple of explanations why a younger girl could pose a higher risk than an older one opposite to Giotto's risk assessment. I also provided a few examples/reasons why a gogo girl can pose a much higher risk than a bar girl even though Giotto tries to tell us that gogo girls are less risky than bar girls.
[/QUOTE]
Yes so what?. This is statistics and probability. With the basic understanding how statistics works it is well known, that to every 80% probability there are the other 20% examples not applying. Otherwise it would be 100%. And I remember only words like more/ less/ equal in Giotto’s text and never ‘full’, ‘no’ ‘0%’, ‘100%’
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Brain666,
In short, we have absolutely no way to tell how risky an unknown sex partner is. Therefore we should treat them all the same.
[/QUOTE]
Yes, so what? The result of our guess is an assumption. And we can fail. Therefore the advise is right, but also very obvious.
[QUOTE=The Traveler] Brain666,
.....
Giotto's advice points into a complete different direction. He told us, that he will be more or less careful or better careless depending on his assumptions about a person. [/QUOTE]
I never read/ interpreted/ understood Giotto's risk assessment this way and I can't believe that there is a high number of mongers who understood it that way. I rather think you either really missunderstand it or you try to assume something between the lines.
[QUOTE=The Traveler] Brain666,
.....
He calls those assumptions "decision matrix" but they are nothing but assumptions as he doesn't know anything about the girls in question, especially nothing about their health status, preferred sexual practices and partners and so on. Therefore his risk assessment is completely use- and worthless.
[/QUOTE]
Yes the nature of risk assessment and risk factors is that you can fail in your assessment. Otherwise it wouldn’t be called assessment. Simply saying that if your risk assessment results in E.g. 90 % aids free asssumption, it still means 10% chance that you just got the unlucky 10% with aids.
[QUOTE=The Traveler] Brain666,
.....
If you decide to have sex with an unknown partner be as careful as possible, don't differentiate and don't believe that one may be more or less risky. Don't lie to yourself ![/QUOTE]
It is Obvious to be as careful as possible. But as you write: It is just as possible. And as possible includes still accepting a remaining risk different from 0.
Also you yourself accept a remaining risk with every girl you have sex with, with every protection measures you may use doing it with her. I don't believe that you don't 'check' or select your girl besides others also in terms of health risk before you ‘act’.
We all have a decision matrix for every sex partner we use. There is looks, there are other social factors, there is an interesting job, just to name some which makes us decide to think on sexual intercourse with a woman, and there are risk factors, such as being witnessed by wife, by colleagues and the potential health risk of an unknown women.
It is a decision matrix we go through with every sexual intercourse we plan which results in a simple yes or no (sometimes its just a yes or no to try ). So don’t tell me that before you have sex with a girl you don’t ‘walk’ through some kind of ‘brain work’ (if you don’t like the word ‘decision matrix, or risk assessment) to decide for yes or no to go for it.
Regards
Brain666
Gentlemen, what the fuck is the debate about?
There is no matrix, it is black or white. One decides if it is worth fucking someone without a condom, or not. There is no way one can tell on the basis of age, gender, occupation etc if the other person has any kind of STI/STD ( depends on language).
The safe way, as I have said before is assume that everyone is infectious. How in the name of fuck can one tell that an educated female lawyer will not have a horrible STI? So what she is educated, but she may fuck a client who is an AIDS ridden fuckhead- don't laugh, it happens. How the fuck can one stereotype?
When I say assume they are infectious, I don't mean treat them like some lepor, but someone with whom someone should take all necessary precautions. This doesn't mean a body suit or a post coital shower in bleach, but simply wearing a condom and reducing the risk factors to minimal.
When one has a monogymous relationship with another, and it is known to be such, and there is, trust/knowledge that no sexual diseases are involved, then it is apt to decide that the risk factor is minimal.
Imagine this: Someone like Opebo, who is by all accounts fairly articulate and charming, fucks some part-time prostitute- maybe a decent girl who needs a few thousand Bhat and turns a trick. He gives her a dose of whatever. Three months later, said same girl meets you, she is hard-up, says she has no regular BF, she has had no symptoms of any STI/STD- common! She fucks you, no condom, because she has no boyfriend, not had one for months, risk factor low! Is it fuck low.
Without a full history of who and when a girl fucked someone, one can never know their status.
The decision is this: I fuck someone without a condom, who WILL have fucked someone before, that person may have any STI, I don't know, and she won't tell OR I will fuck someone with a condom, tha person may have an STI, I don't tell, and she won't tell, but I will not take the chance.
Matrix, bollocks. Even a virgin cannot be guaranteed STI free. Someone can shoot a wad outside her **** and it can go inside. She may be an IV drug user- do you know? Are profesional people not users?
I could go on, but hopefully the pointis taken!
Pete is on target here. When the typical traveling monger lands in Thailand for his week of cavorting, he isn't going to know any girls well enough to do the analysis and he certainly can't trust them to tell him the truth about how old they are, let alone how long they've been working. Heck, even good non-p4p women often have no honor around this; that last is definitely not limited to Thailand.
Yes there are exceptions like Opebo who has his own rationalizations, but most of us like being disease-free and staying that way. So it's on with the condom for FS. Every time. Less worry that way. Other activities like DFK, BBBJ and DATY, I treat as discretionary depending on how the girl looks and smells, but I recognize that is not foolproof.
[QUOTE=Duniawala]Traveler, could you please take this to the Fight Club thread. It's between you and Giotto. I am sorry, but we all seem to miss the finer points of your argument about Giotto's staement. So take it to the Fight Club and thrash it out there.[/QUOTE]
Duni,
with all due respect, but it was directed at Brain666, not Giotto.
Besides missing the point you seem not be able to read either.
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]I think discussion of what activities are risky or not so risky is far more worthwhile than debating whether one girl is more risky than another.
If the right precautions are taken the girl's background history becomes an insignificant factor which is just as well since we will never know what the background is for a new aquantaince.
Any normal girl is a high risk if she has ever had unprotected sex in the few months before her last blood test (or anytime after) if she had one.
Now all of that is really unknown, ain't it.
Am I feeling lucky today, punk? (Sorry Clint)
Better to protect all risky activities. I don't beleive in luck.
Shit happens all the time.[/QUOTE]
Mick Licker,
I totally agree.
My question directed at Giotto regarding which of the girls is more risky due to his risk assessment rules should only show that those rules are nonsense due to the already mentioned reasons.
I knew from the very beginning that he would refrain to answer for obvious reasons.
Brain666,
since all your answer were "YES" I really don't know why you disagree with what I said about Giotto's risk assessment rules.
I also allow myself to cite Giotto [i]"There is a selected number of girls which I have a little bit more fun then normal Before taking that risk I do some basic layman medical checks (should mention that I have a EMT education):"[/i]
So Doc Giotto's sex practices depend on his assumptions regarding the health status of his partners. If he believes/assumes that they are less risky he will do additional sex practices like oral e.g.
How could I forget that you (or at least Doc Giotto) can see and smell HIV, Syphilis, Hep A,B,C and other nasty deseases, especially in their very early stages, right ?
Due to Giotto, an educated, young, good looking girl - if wealthy even better - is very unlikely a risk. Damn, how does it come that nobody told the HIV virus not to infect those people ? All those thousands and thousands of young, well educated and good looking people who died of AIDS could still be alive and the millions with STD/STI would have never been infected as well.
Pete got it completely right and just confirms what I am saying ever since : Expect all to be risky and act accordingly. You simply don't have enough info to put them in order and say who is more or less risky. Any attempt to do so is nonsense and you are just lying to yourself.
Though I generally believe that all discussions about HIV / AIDS and the related risks are useful in general and help to fight the transmission of this disease it I would prefer to detach the argumentation from any personal aspects or wrong development of the past. It is a too important issue.
I was accused here of having given wrong advice and even worse to underestimate the infection risk, and I think everybody can understand that I don’t feel so well with this image. For that we should get things straight and have a short review of what was really written.
After my report about Biergarten Soi 7 and my STD warning in there I was asked by Peter Kin about my local viewpoint of site/bar/massage parlor related STD transmission risks:
[QUOTE=Peter Kin]Giotto
Thanks for the warning on STDs etc.
From your experience could you prepare a list of most likely to least likely for STDs etc for:
Biergarden, Streets, Nan, Cowboy, MPs etc etc.
A local viewpoint would be helpful
Peter[/QUOTE]
I thought about how I really evaluate risks, about my personal behavior, and found it interesting to try a report about that. Here a link to that report:
[URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=499576[/URL]
I started the report with a clear introduction, that all content of the report is my personal opinion, my personal norm to evaluate risks.
[QUOTE=Giotto]Due to the fact that I obviously have the talent and intention to open every possible can of worms I will try in this report to categorize and evaluate the risk factors for catching STDs in the Bangkok P4P scene. I refer to the question of Peter Kin some weeks ago.
Everything I write here is my personal opinion, my personal norm to evaluate the risk for each single experience.
[b][size=+1]1. Introduction[/size][/b]
[u]The general risk of catching STDs in the P4P scene in Bangkok is still high.[/u] Though the numbers of new HIV infections are falling in Thailand it should not be forgotten that we are not only talking about HIV. This might be the disease which scares us most, but there are other diseases which can cause severe damage to anybodies health, and additionally be spread further once you are infected. I only want to mention Hepatitis here, some types of this disease is about 100 times easier to transfer than HIV.
All these arguments cannot be used to justify the avoidance of using condoms. [b]Condoms have to be used in any case, and under any circumstances.[/b]
There is no official empirical analysis available to measure the infection rates based on the classifications I defined. Everything I write here is simply based on my personal assumption, they are my personal conclusions. Nothing more than that. [/QUOTE]
I wrote very clearly:
[QUOTE=Giotto]All these arguments cannot be used to justify the avoidance of using condoms. [b]Condoms have to be used in any case, and under any circumstances.[/b] [/QUOTE]
What followed then in that report was a list of risk factors which I am thinking about when I evaluate STD infection risks by contact with a woman/girl. This list was for sure not complete, and I remember some reports from others afterwards adding some additional risk factors to this list.
After this list of risk factors I then come to some conclusions which I experienced during writing the report. The first conclusion again refers again to unprotected sex, and gives the clear message that there is only one way for me to skip the condom, and that is after having performed the complete set of STD tests:
[QUOTE=Giotto][b]7.1. Tests[/b]
During writing this report I came to the conclusion that it doesn’t matter what I write here, it is somehow obsolete. There is only ONE way of being sure not to get infected – and that is a complete STD test for a sexual partner before performing any unprotected sex. And that also means to wait for at least 3 month to perform 2 AIDS tests – and during this 3 months ONLY protected activities! [/QUOTE]
Then second conclusion refers to oral sex, again clearly labeled as “My Personal Risk Assessment”:
[QUOTE=Giotto] [b]7.2. My Personal Risk Assessment[/b]
First let me state very clearly that there is NO WAY for me to take the risk of performing unprotected sex with a girl from the P4P scene. I always use a condom – no exceptions.
The only risk I sometimes take is related to oral sex. There is a selected number of girls which I have a little bit more fun then normal with. [/QUOTE]
I came to the same conclusion as many others here in this thread.
The last sentence was now taken out of the context in one of the reports before in this thread: [i]“There is a selected number of girls which I have a little bit more fun then normal with.” [/i] It is clearly stated what this risk I am willing to take refers to: [b] The only risk I sometimes take is related to oral sex.[/b]
Now we can discuss the risks of oral sex, and the different opinions about that. There were some reports about this issue too. Anyway – such a discussion would be again helpful, if it is based on facts.
For me it became clear during writing the report that I use a decision matrix based on all the mentioned risk factors before only as an supporting tool for making a decision of taking the risk of oral sex. Additionally to this decision matrix I perform some checks before sex, and make the decision solely on the outcome of this checks, whether I will have oral sex with this woman or not. As soon as I have the slightest impression of missing cleanliness I will refrain from oral sex, that is the basic message. And as soon as there are clear indications of possible infections (eg. skin lesions) I even will not have protected sex with that woman/girl.
What followed then was a more or less heated discussion about microscopic cuts of the skin and the fact whether I have given an advice or not. My original report did not contain any warning towards microscopic cuts in the skin, so I decided to refer to this risk in some of the following reports. The discussion went then so far that there was even statements that you can get infected via the normal unbroken skin (non-mucous membrane), and I made clear that opinion is not supported by the actual HIV science. But other STDs can be transferred via the normal unbroken skin. And we forgot to discuss another issue: The we rub the body fluid from a woman/girl into our eyes – that is definitely a risk, if we have the fluid on our hands.
My report did not contain any advice to others, I only wrote about how I make decisions about how extensive a session can be.
During the last weeks then the risk factors were target of the discussion. I see no use to argue about that, because I was writing about my personal risk assessment. Others will have a different risk assessment. To know about this might have an influence on my future decision matrix about this issue, if I can follow their argumentation, but who can change the past. But even if this would be possible - there will still be risk factors and a decision matrix! It is basically that what happens in the brain when one tries to evaluate a general risk - written down in a report.
To a certain extend I am surprised that nobody up to now smiled about that and asked the question: Giotto, if you are going to have sex with a woman/girl, do you have a paper and a pen with you and fill out a risk assessment fact sheet first to evaluate the risk?
Combination of risks: There were examples of risks which were balancing each other (old/young combined with Freelancing/Beer Bar/Gogo Bar etc), and there were examples of mixed activities (Freelancing Gogo girls). Or course, that is what a risk assessment is all about, to evaluate those singe risks components and somehow get to a result, in which all risk factors are added up to one single number. Scale the risk factors based on what you personally think is an important one, evaluate them – and get a number/level. And this number then can be compared to your own personal maximum risk number/level you want to take.
In that specific report I finally then remind everybody to his own responsibility:
[QUOTE=Giotto] [b]7.3. Protection and Responsibility[/b]
Finally – everybody please sits down and thinks for a minute before he gets involved in this game. [b]You and only you are responsible[/b] for the level of protection you require. Do not expect the girl to ensure that you use a condom! You have to be prepared, you need to have condoms with you, and you have to make sure that you do not get into contact with any body fluids of the girl. [/QUOTE]
I find it quite difficult to misunderstand all that, but obviously it is possible.
If now the impression of readers is, that all the risk assessment attempt is not of any practical use, and that the only way to protect yourself is to use condoms and avoid any contact with body fluids of a woman then I will fully support that. Even if you make an risk assessment there stays a risk > 0 – and there should be no discussion necessary about that.
For this reason I added another issue in later posts, which I find much more interesting to discuss:
[QUOTE=Giotto]… [b][u]Final Statement:[/u] The biggest risk factor are we ourselves, getting carried away during the sexual act and forgetting to use the condom. … [/b]Giotto[/QUOTE]
Compared to this risk all other risk factors related to the girls can be simply ignored! But the mentioned report was not about this risk, it was about site and girl related risks.
I personally doubt many “safest sex” statements here in this thread. To perform complete safe sex is nearly impossible and not really enjoyable (my POV). I discussed the issue with many of our hotel guests, and I know that a huge number (the majority) sometimes go bareback. I know the questions where to perform tests, after a guest gets carried away during a session. I know what the guests want when they ask me whether our girls are tested or not. I saw the fear in the faces of so many guys who lost control in the night before. All that is so human…
Some other issues I would like to add to the discussion, because it was not mentioned up to now:
[b]Normal Skin Infection Risk[/b]
We never discussed the risk of the girl getting infected when giving us a hand job. If there is a risk of cuts in the fingers the girl should be at risk, following argumentation lines from before.
[b]COF[/b]
The eyes are endangered, an easy entry point for many viruses and bacteria.
We don’t think too much about girls getting into contact with our body fluids, do we? We all like BBBJCIM?
[b]Finally: Back to the risk assessments.
I would be interested in clear statements about personal behaviors. Who has never taken any risk during a P4P session? That means: Never touched a pussy (because of possible cuts in a finger), never got a BBBJ, never had sex without a condom, never eaten a pussy, always successfully avoided to get into any contact with the body fluid of a woman, etc. etc. …[/b]
I admit, that I sometimes take risks, and to decide with which woman I can take a certain risk I have my own risks assessment scheme. But – I always use condoms for intercourse.
Giotto
I prepared to admit that some classes of girls are more risky than others statistically but do not wish to get involved in those arguments.
Anyway guys will just select the girls that appeal to them anyway.
Now suppose there is a problem with the precautions, e.g. condom slips off or breaks. These things have been known to happen accidentally occasionally.
Then need to rectify with the backup condoms immediately.
Always double check condom O.K. before orgasming (mainly for the girls sake)
After breaking condom girl will probably dash off and douse with something and be upset.
This is where the class of girl you are with might count for something.
I don't go for the cheapest of girls when mongering. I want the best and those groups more likely to have had real HIV tests would appeal even more.
Girls sometimes use sponges inside that cause can condoms to break through friction abrasion if longer than a cursory screw. I refuse to fuck girls using sponges no matter how much they deny it. Its either take it out or forget it.
If you are going to have sex with anyone regularly, then both should get HIV and other STD tested at the clinic for peace of mind, even though condoms might still be worn. Its just proving what you verbally claim.
My ex girlfriend expected me to be tested once every 4-6 months at least since she didn't trust me completely not to do anything stupid with another girl. I wasn't doing anything really stupid, but saw no harm in the tests at all (not expensive in Thailand).
[QUOTE=Martians]
As regards Odepo: his attempt to break a condom seems bizarre as I cannot see how that would increase his physical enjoyment.[/quote]
Surely you are pretending ignorance here, Martians. It is obvious that condomless sex will provide significantly more stimulation than sex with a condom. Many things can be attributed to personal taste - for example you may prefer a less intense sexual experience - but I think we can all agree that [b]the actual nerves are stimulated more[/b] during bareback sex than when they are covered up by a layer of plastic.
[quote]However, his outback reports and his further evidence (with Asian Rain) of the prevalence of barebacking should give the more cautious food for thought. This shit about the quality of life (condomless) versus quantity (condom) should be addressed to HIV/STI sufferers.[/QUOTE]
If anyone thinks that most people in the world are going around putting up with the awkward, pleasureless activity of condom sex, he is a silly fool who has no understanding of human nature (or for that matter the human condition - which is one of incipient mortality anyway). This is why researchers are pursuing the idea of a lubricant or gel of some kind which kills HIV - because it will offer a protective measure which does not ruin the act which is, after all, the point of all our lives.
[QUOTE=Giotto]Though I generally believe that all discussions about HIV / AIDS and the related risks are useful in general and help to fight the transmission of this disease it I would prefer to detach the argumentation from any personal aspects or wrong development of the past. It is a too important issue.
<cut>
Giotto[/QUOTE]
Very thoroughly covered again. Its hard to see why your comments were seen as controversial really. Everyone has their own views which cannot be always exactly the same.
Its just about being 99.999% sure of not dying through mongering and still getting to have some fun.
Whoops I went too far with 99.999.
Could easily die of a heart attack while fucking some sensational young sex goddess. But I don't think the risk is high enough to stop me.
[QUOTE=Opebo]If anyone thinks that most people in the world are going around putting up with the awkward, pleasureless activity of condom sex[/QUOTE]
Most of us mongers have to put up with it, but its not 'pleasureless'. Still, mongers go hunting for several girls to fuck in a day, despite the condoms used. There must be pleasure. Its not all pure addiction with no pleasure.
The difference between no condom and a very good thin condom is there but not so much as to be worth very high risks for most of us.
I would agree that some condoms are in the lower pleasure category. I select my condoms very carefully to be comfortable fit and minimising pleasure reduction.
The barebackers are in the minority, and a dieing breed. They possibly rely on the fact that guys catch form girls with more difficulty than the reverse.
But if they bareback often enough in risky places, eventually statistical probability will catch up with them.
You can dash accross a multi lane freeway once and survive, but wouldn't keep every few minutes. Sooner or later you will get collected.
Of cause metaphors prove nothing and only illustrate a belief.
Its worth getting a regular girlfriend and eventually moving to unprotected sex with her, assuming you both can be trusted to behave appropriatly. Obviously some mongers/husbands/boyfriends cannot be trusted. Thats obviously why the girls die.
[QUOTE=Mick Licker] The difference between no condom and a very good thin condom is there but not so much as to be worth very high risks for most of us.[/QUOTE]A nurse at a a safe-sex clinic once told me that a little lube on the knob before putting on a condom increases the "natural" feel dramatically. It works. (I still remember that honey of a nurse. They should only have ugly nurses checking out your equipment in a sex clinic. Just not fair).
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]The barebackers are in the minority, and a dying breed.
[/QUOTE]Was this double-entendre intentional? Pretty much sums it all up.
Come on boys, let's get it right here. Sex with a condom, sex without a condom: I have fucked many women without a condom- yeah, trusted ones, one of whom was my own mother-in-law, who had given birth. Not as tight as one could wish, but I got off, and enjoyed it- why? ...later.
I have fucked very, very tight Chinese and Thai girls with a condom, and yeah, again, enjoyed it, but in all honesty had I not used a condom I may not have lasted quite so long. My wife has had no children, and is as tight as she was 20 years ago. For some time I had to fuck her with a condom because she couldn't be on the pill and I was waiting for the snip. Granted, it wasn't quite as good, but I got off!
This is it. When you fuck someone, it could be anyone. Ultimately you will shoot your load. Is it not the case that the excitement is that you are shagging someone who you find attractive, and sexy, and who you would never normally be able to shag without paying?
If the difference to you is skin on skin, or skin on mucus membrane, and that is the only difference, between the girl and someone else, then please tell me if you have not lost the plot?
The excitement is shagging someone different. Suppose that someone different is a fucken stunner, but has had 10 kids, well, you wouldn't touch the sides, even without a condom. Suppose she is stunning, and tight, well, she will get you there . Shagging my mother in law was forbidden, different, and it wouldn't matter if I had used 30 condoms, she allowed me inside her!
What you are doing is shagging the girl, not her twat. One twat feels like another, with or without a condom. What is different is the girl you are shagging. If she does it for you, then it doesn't matter, slack ****, or condom, it is about the girl you are for that instant making love to.
That is my opinion
Others: Giotto has slapped in one of his mega essays siOdepo: nce my last post.
Odepo: I referred to you trying to break a condom as being bizarre. I cannot see the difference in enjoyment from a torn as opposed to an untorn condom. I have fucked countless (!) women bareback and condoms have broken on several occasions. They are not the same thing
Why did yioy confuse the two? We know why Giotta has his spam agenda here but what agenda have you?
To be honest, they all feel tight to me, Peter.
[QUOTE=Petemcc] I have fucked many women without a condom... one of whom was my own mother-in-law, who had given birth. Not as tight as one could wish, but I got off, and enjoyed it... [/QUOTE]Hey, I remember seeing you and your two lovers fighting it out on the Jerry Springer show.
PS - Your mother-in-law had given birth? Really? Think about it.
[QUOTE=Giotto]
I started the report with a clear introduction, that all content of the report is my personal opinion, my personal norm to evaluate risks.
...
During the last weeks then the risk factors were target of the discussion. I see no use to argue about that, because I was writing about my personal risk assessment. Others will have a different risk assessment.
...
I find it quite difficult to misunderstand all that, but obviously it is possible.
[/QUOTE]
Giotto,
yes, you stated that the report contains your personal opinion but you simply forget what signals you are sending out to others.
Some in here - especially newbies - who may also be guests at your place may see you as an experienced monger who knows his shit. When being in a situation in which they have to decide to do certain sex practices or to even go bareback or not they may remember your risk assessment in which you clearly state that a younger girl is less risky than an older one and a gogo girl poses a smaller risk than a bar girl, who again poses a smaller risk than a freelancer.
Since they have met their girls in a gogo or even found them at your (hopefully controlled) place, they may rate the involved risk lower than it actually is due to your risk assessment.
Sure, it will be their decision but based on your risk assessment as they put some trust in you.
This is the reason why I think your risk assessment is dangerous as it seduces people and makes them believe that there is a way to rate the involved risks by simply looking at a few attributes of the girl.
You should know that there is no way to tell that one person poses a higher risk than another one. And that's the reason why you still avoid to answer my simple question in which I only combined two of your named factors.
[QUOTE=Giotto]
I discussed the issue with many of our hotel guests, and I know that a huge number (the majority) sometimes go bareback. I know the questions where to perform tests, after a guest gets carried away during a session. I know what the guests want when they ask me whether our girls are tested or not. I saw the fear in the faces of so many guys who lost control in the night before. All that is so human…
[/QUOTE]
Do I have to add anything, don't you just confirm my above concerns ?
[QUOTE=Giotto]
And as soon as there are clear indications of possible infections (eg. skin lesions) I even will not have protected sex with that woman/girl.
[/QUOTE]
What better indication for an infection do you need than swollen lymph nodess ?
But you still fuck a girl with swollen lymph nodes.
[QUOTE=Giotto]
- Lymph Nodes: Swollen lymph nodes in the groin, under the arms, behind the lower jaw, cervix ?
----> If I find knots there – no contact with any body fluid, no oral sex!
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Giotto]
- Smell: Vaginal odor after finger probe from deep inside?
----> If yes – no contact with any body fluid, no oral sex!
[/QUOTE]
Additionally, anybody who follows your "check" scheme will put himself at great danger by putting his unprotected finger into her (eventually bloody) pussy. You say that you will avoid any contact with any body fluids. Hmm, didn't you already had contact with body fluids by sticking your finger DEEP inside her ? It's like putting your hand into a fire to check if it's still burning. But we already had that, didn't we ?
[QUOTE=Giotto]
... The discussion went then so far that there was even statements that you can get infected via the normal unbroken skin (non-mucous membrane), ...
[/QUOTE]
Hmm, haven't seen that. Please provide the source.
[QUOTE=Giotto]
Combination of risks: There were examples of risks which were balancing each other (old/young combined with Freelancing/Beer Bar/Gogo Bar etc), and there were examples of mixed activities (Freelancing Gogo girls). Or course, that is what a risk assessment is all about, to evaluate those singe risks components and somehow get to a result, in which all risk factors are added up to one single number. Scale the risk factors based on what you personally think is an important one, evaluate them – and get a number/level. And this number then can be compared to your own personal maximum risk number/level you want to take.
[/QUOTE]
Funny, now you hide your answer by saying those two factors are balancing each other, or in other words the risk that a young bargirl poses to you is equal to that of an older gogo girl.
OK, so age and workplace are equal factors. But what if the gogo girl also can be found freelancing at the Beergarden while the bargirl does not do freelancing. Wouldn't it lead to the conclusion - completely based on your risk assessment rules - that the young bar girl actually poses a smaller risk than the older freelancing gogo girl ?
You see, those risk assessments based on a few attributes are completely useless because you don't know shit about the girls.
I personally believe that your whole risk assessment is complete crap and that you don't follow your own decision matrix. Do you really think about all those attributes ? If you would, you would only target young, attractive, well educated, [b]sexually disinterested[/b], wealthy regulars who originate from Central Thailand and who you found in a High Class Club. They pose the least risk and therefore allow you to get the most satisfaction as the smaller risk allows you to perform certain sex practices besides being less concerned during sex which could kill the whole thing.
I rather follow Pete and believe men - me included - choose women simply by their looks and attitude. If she is cute and nice you want to fuck her, no matter where she comes from, how old, educated or wealthy she is or where you found her.
We pick who we pick and should be as careful as we can, never believing or assuming that one may be less risky than another as it could make us uncareful. Your above story about your guests speaks volumes about it.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Giotto,
yes, you stated that the report contains your personal opinion but you simply forget what signals you are sending out to others. [/QUOTE]The Traveler,
the signal I send is mentioned in the first chapters of my report, not quoted by you:
[QUOTE=Giotto]All these arguments cannot be used to justify the avoidance of using condoms. [b]Condoms have to be used in any case, and under any circumstances.[/b] [/QUOTE]
I think that readers/mongers/newbies reading this free of any fighting history Giotto/The Traveller will understand the message and intention of that report very well.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]What better indication for an infection do you need than swollen lymph nodess ?
But you still fuck a girl with swollen lymph nodes. [/QUOTE]I answered:
[QUOTE=Giotto]----> If I find knots there – no contact with any body fluid, no oral sex! [/QUOTE]I think the answer is OK, but I agree – better send her home untouched, if you want to eliminate risk.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Hmm, haven't seen that. Please provide the source. [/QUOTE]Infection risk via normal skin. Your post:
[URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.info/forum/showpost.php?p=504660[/URL]
That time you provided the following statement:
[QUOTE=The Traveler]…
It's also not impossible for the HIV virus to pass through normal skin. It's only harder due to the callus on the surface, but not impossible.
… [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Funny, now you hide your answer by saying those two factors are balancing each other, or in other words the risk that a young bargirl poses to you is equal to that of an older gogo girl. [/QUOTE]Hide? Why? That’s simply mathematics, that risk factors can balance each other…depending on the personal evaluation of each risk.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]OK, so age and workplace are equal factors. [/QUOTE]I did not say that. I think you misunderstood this structure of the report all the time. It is up to your risk assessment which factor you evaluate higher. If you think the age is more significant as a factor than the workplace/site than you evaluate it accordingly. If you think it is not a real risk factor set your evaluation to zero, and it disappears. Decision matrix!
[QUOTE=The Traveler]But what if the gogo girl also can be found freelancing at the Beergarden while the bargirl does not do freelancing. Wouldn't it lead to the conclusion - completely based on your risk assessment rules - that the young bar girl actually poses a smaller risk than the older freelancing gogo girl ? [/QUOTE]In my risk assessment I would always assume the highest risk option for a single risk factor (workplace is the factor in this case, age is a second factor, to be evaluated separately) - freelancing would cause a high risk assumption.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]...Do you really think about all those attributes ? If you would, you would only target young, attractive, well educated, [b]sexually disinterested[/b], wealthy regulars who originate from Central Thailand and who you found in a High Class Club. They pose the least risk and therefore allow you to get the most satisfaction as the smaller risk allows you to perform certain sex practices besides being less concerned during sex which could kill the whole thing.[/QUOTE]In saying [b]"They pose the least risk"[/b] you somehow confirm to have performed the same thing I was writing about: [b]A Risk Assessment[/b] :) .
Come on man, seams to me that we both want the same thing, but we go different ways. We both use condoms, don't we?
-----
Oh, that reminds me, you did not answer MY questions :) :
[b]"Finally: Back to the risk assessments.
I would be interested in clear statements about personal behaviors. Who has never taken any risk during a P4P session? That means: Never touched a pussy (because of possible cuts in a finger), never got a BBBJ, never had sex without a condom, never eaten a pussy, always successfully avoided to get into any contact with the body fluid of a woman, etc. etc. …"[/b]
???
Giotto
There are pages and pages of argument here about risk etc, but the bottom line is both Giotto and Traveller are right.
Giotto is right in the sense that certain girls are a different risk than others, it is all a matter of statistics and we to an extent live our lives to them, but I really cannot see why anyone would risk there lives by stats. We could all arugue to we are blue in the face about what those risks are and what percentage risk a fresh faced gogo girl has compared to a freelancer so I really cannot see the point to it. Trav and others are right in this sense that we should all be covering up and not fooling ourselves that we will be ok simply because we have choosen someone from a lower risk group. Sure the chances might be lower, but the chance is still there.
But the bottom line is there is a risk, there is a risk from the freelancers, the bargirls, the gogo girls, the officer girls and even our own ladies, including wives at home. For mine even if the risk of getting something off the 18yo gogo girl who has been working for a week is only 1% then that is 1% too much. The only risk I would take is with a women I loved and trusted who I was in a long term manogomous relationship with. At the moment I don't have that, if I did I wouldn't be punting.
[QUOTE=Giotto]
I think that readers/mongers/newbies reading this free of any fighting history Giotto/The Traveller will understand the message and intention of that report very well.
[/QUOTE]
Giotto,
whatever history we may have, my criticism is solely based on your report and I solely stick to what you have said, nothing more, nothing less.
Additionally I don't have any dislike in you as a person, I am not your enemy but that doesn't mean that I have to agree with you on everything you say and shout "hurray" each time you post something.
Stating that it can be determined that one person poses a higher risk than another one is bad advice, simply because we can't and it is misleading. It may lead to a point where people believe that they are able to access the involved risk when they can not.
[QUOTE=Giotto]
Infection risk via normal skin. Your post:
[i]"You called my objection being nonsense and denied any risks, saying that the HIV virus can't pass normal skin.
I pointed out to injuries and microscopic wounds that everybody has. It's also not impossible for the HIV virus to pass through normal skin. It's only harder due to the callus on the surface, but not impossible."[/i]
[/QUOTE]
Oh yes, now I recall. Thanks for checking back.
The HIV virus targets the human T-helper cells, which do also exist in the normal skin but just in smaller numbers. I remember that I have seen a very good documention produced by the BBC in which they say that it is possible to get infected through the normal skin, even though it is not very likely due to the callus on the surface and the small number of T-helper cells in the upper layers of the skin.
When you first referred to it you forgot to mention that I said that it isn't very likely. It's not impossible but you completely rule it out. I just wonder why doctors and people in laboratories wear gloves, just because of my beforementioned microscopic injuries - which do not exist or are unimportant due to your interpretation (see previous discussion regarding this issue) - or because it makes sense to be as careful as you can when handling possible infected material. I say better safe than sorry.
[QUOTE=Giotto]
Hide? Why? That’s simply mathematics, that risk factors can balance each other…depending on the personal evaluation of each risk.
[/QUOTE]
LOL, so now it's just math.
Yes hide, if the answer is so easy why you refused to tell us what your personal risk assessment/decision matrix says to my question.
And didn't we find out that those factors did not balance out because the older gogo girl was in fact an older freelancer who also worked in a gogo. In this case age and workplace made her more risky than the young bargirl, which means your risk assessmenmt rules already failed at a very simple example due to the fact that you don't know shit about the girls. Therefore those rules are useless and can be misleading.
[QUOTE=Giotto]
I did not say that. I think you misunderstood this structure of the report all the time. It is up to your risk assessment which factor you evaluate higher. If you think the age is more significant as a factor than the workplace/site than you evaluate it accordingly. If you think it is not a real risk factor set your evaluation to zero, and it disappears. Decision matrix!
[/QUOTE]
You said that by saying that they balance out. If it is simple math as you said above they must be ranking equally, otherwise they can't balance out. It's simply impossible and the way sorting orders work, if the first factor (workplace) differs and has a higher priority than the second one (age), any different in the second one can not lead to put this factor combination above the first one.
Anyway, you never mentioned any priority and if there would be one, how could they balance out ?
Nevertheless you still avoid a clear answer. I asked YOU what YOUR risk assessment tells YOU in that case. So stop talking about others evaluation of risk factors when people ask for YOUR evaluation of those factors.
[QUOTE=Giotto]
In my risk assessment I would always assume the highest risk option for a single risk factor (workplace is the factor in this case, age is a second factor, to be evaluated separately) - freelancing would cause a high risk assumption.
[/QUOTE]
You see, your risk assessment failed. The less risky gogo girl turned out to be a more risky freelancer. Since she is also older than the bargirl her risk dramatically increased compare to the bargirl simply because you did not know shit about her.
[QUOTE=Giotto]
In saying [b]"They pose the least risk"[/b] you somehow confirm to have performed the same thing I was writing about: [b]A Risk Assessment[/b] :) .
[/QUOTE]
Try to turn my words around, don't you ?
I clearly stated that due to YOUR risk assessment rules girls with the mentioned attributes would pose the least risk. All those mentioned attributes were rated by YOU with the least risk, not me.
[QUOTE=Giotto]
Come on man, seams to me that we both want the same thing, but we go different ways. We both use condoms, don't we?
[/QUOTE]
Yes we do, but I don't tell other people that one girl is less risky than another one, which is misleading as I don't know shit about either one.
[QUOTE=Giotto]
Oh, that reminds me, you did not answer MY questions :) :
[b]"Finally: Back to the risk assessments.
I would be interested in clear statements about personal behaviors. Who has never taken any risk during a P4P session? That means: Never touched a pussy (because of possible cuts in a finger), never got a BBBJ, never had sex without a condom, never eaten a pussy, always successfully avoided to get into any contact with the body fluid of a woman, etc. etc. …"[/b]
[/QUOTE]
Come on man, now you try to justify your bad advice with the fact that there is no way to avoid all and any risks involved with sex with an unknown partner, especially if she is a P4P.
But I can clearly state that I never had unprotected sex with a P4P, do not eat pussy of a P4P, do not stick my fingers in a pussy of a P4P and avoid french kissing with P4P. Maybe that's the reason why I prefer to have GFs, as we can perform all sex practices anyone can think of.
Sadly there is no way of completely avoiding to get in contact with female body fluids. The root of your penis and/or your pubic area will always come in contact with more or less fluid from her vagina as she gets horny. that's why I don't shave this area when going after P4P and put some lubricant on it as an additional layer and to avoid friction when the girl is riding me.
In short, I take as much precaution as possible and try to reduce the risk involved to a minimum no matter what my assumptions are about the girl and her health status.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]...Maybe that's the reason why I prefer to have GFs, as we can perform all sex practices anyone can think of.[/QUOTE]
I'm sorry, but the disparity between your comical overreaction to the risk with prostitutes and your abject and naive trust of 'girlfriends' must be noted! Man, they're all prostitutes in one way or another, and even if you don't believe that, they just people and therefore certainly very apt to stray given any opportunity or incentive.
If I really believed sex were as risky as you apparently do, the last thing I would do would be to trust some 'girlfriend'.
[QUOTE=Jc373]There are pages and pages of argument here about risk etc, but the bottom line is both Giotto and Traveller are right.
Giotto is right in the sense that certain girls are a different risk than others, it is all a matter of statistics and we to an extent live our lives to them, but I really cannot see why anyone would risk there lives by stats. We could all arugue to we are blue in the face about what those risks are and what percentage risk a fresh faced gogo girl has compared to a freelancer so I really cannot see the point to it. Trav and others are right in this sense that we should all be covering up and not fooling ourselves that we will be ok simply because we have choosen someone from a lower risk group. Sure the chances might be lower, but the chance is still there.
But the bottom line is there is a risk, there is a risk from the freelancers, the bargirls, the gogo girls, the officer girls and even our own ladies, including wives at home. For mine even if the risk of getting something off the 18yo gogo girl who has been working for a week is only 1% then that is 1% too much. The only risk I would take is with a women I loved and trusted who I was in a long term manogomous relationship with. At the moment I don't have that, if I did I wouldn't be punting.[/QUOTE]
Jc373,
absolutely correct and nicely summed up.
[QUOTE=Opebo]I'm sorry, but the disparity between your comical overreaction to the risk with prostitutes and your abject and naive trust of 'girlfriends' must be noted! Man, they're all prostitutes in one way or another, and even if you don't believe that, they just people and therefore certainly very apt to stray given any opportunity or incentive.
If I really believed sex were as risky as you apparently do, the last thing I would do would be to trust some 'girlfriend'.[/QUOTE]
Opebo,
you obviously are a lonely guy who probably never had a girlfriend.
Of course I put some trust in them as anybody does who is in a relationship, but I guess you don't know what a relationship is as nobody wants you. As already said, my GFs usually live with me and therefore have no occasion for any "additional" activities. It's also questionable why they should do it, there is no advantage for them besides maybe fucking someone else, but by thinking of you I doubt it is desirable.
I always have my girlfriends checked twice over a period of three months before going bareback to make sure that they do not carry the HIV virus or any other nasty stuff. Just did that with my current GF, made the second complete test for HIV, Hep. A+B, Syphillis, Clamydia, Papilloma, bacterias and fungus. Also a complete blood test incl. sugar, HDL, LDL and blood count to detect a current infection. This test cost about 8000 baht.
Also made a complete pep smear test which will set you back an additional 12.000 baht.
Therefore it's not just naive believe in my GF, but hard scientific facts that she is healthy.
I assume your mom, grandmas and/or sisters have been the GF of someone. Will or have they also been straying around on any given opportunity or incentive ? Do you also think of them as prostitutes ? And did you tell them ?
If not, what makes them different from my GFs or any other women ?
Did you ever hear of love, affection and desire ?
Maybe you don't know about such things because your are such an obnoxious, unpopular guy who is in the doghouse.
[QUOTE=Piper1]Hey, I remember seeing you and your two lovers fighting it out on the Jerry Springer show.
PS - Your mother-in-law had given birth? Really? Think about it.[/QUOTE]
My wife is the step daughter
Traveller,
This is now really funny, better to say LOL.
You yourself went trough some brainwork (others would call it risk assessment and Giotto being more a 'math guy' probably Decision Matrix) and figured that 'GF' are less risky.
I agree and in my decision matrix/ risk assessment a 'GF' is as well less risky then an official p4p. But we all know that especially in Thailand the 'GF' P4P scenery is much more fluent then in other countries.
Girls fuck around (to our favour), some p4p fulltime or part time for cash, others occasionally for some other benefit and some just for fun. Girl’s pussy, also non P4P is somehow in average easier accessible for us then in other countries. Where else can you have with some nice skills the chance to go ahead with sales girls, air hostesses etc. then in Thailand.
According to statistics again we many times stated here that even 'GF's' have some remaining risk.
What makes the thing interesting is that you change your behaviour 'and do all the things you can think of' what you don't do with your 'more risky' P4P girls.
So finally we figure that you yourself are using your own adjusted risk assessment to also play around at least 'less protected' if you consider risk low.
Welcome to the real world I can say. I conclude that the only difference between The Traveller and Opepo is simply the different personal risk factors.
Greetings
Brain666
To understand the fundamentals of safe sex risk management ( :) ) it seams to be necessary to explain the mathematical principles of a decision matrix.
Let us try to buy a washing machine:
To make a decision which of the 100 available products we take we first think about, on which factors we will base our decision. What do we think about, what can be important when we buy a washing machine?
Let’s assume, we are men, and have neither much knowledge about washing nor huge fantasy as women have sometimes. So we only find 4 decision factors:
Price
Functionality
Quality
Colour
The next step would now be to evaluate the scale to the factors, how important are they? That depends on our personal decision factor scaling assessment (:D). If we have enough money the price is not as important as if it would cost us a months salary. And for women the color might be more important than for us. I give it a try (please don’t attack me for that, it’s only a washing machine):
- Price……...……….4
- Functionality……2
- Quality……..…….6
- Colour…………....1
That means basically, that for me the quality is most important. I don’t give a shit what colour it is.
Now the evaluation of the single product, to be done with a point rating between 0 – 10, for each single decision factor.
Now we go to a washing machine shop and look at all products. The price ranges are in between Euro 200,00 and Euro 1,000.00 (to be honest, I have no idea what a washing machine costs). That means eg., that the Euro 200.00 machine gets 10 points, and the Euro 1,000.00 machine gets 1 point (we don’t want to waste money), above that all machines are ruled out – they get 0 points (a washing machine for more than Euro 1,000.00 – that would be crazy. I have my wife!).
Functionality is checked out and evaluated in a point rating between 0 – 10, based on the manuals and presentations we get in the shop. There is something like different washing programs - hell, I have no idea.
The quality – we develop ourselves to washing machine specialist during the visit in the shop(s), so we evaluate the quality – yes, in a point rating between 0 and 10 !!! Of course we are influenced in this evaluation by our personal preferences and experiences with brand names from the past.
Finally – the colour. White is nice but boring, 3 points. The silver one looks nice, 8 points. The black one – so so, 5 points.
Now we take a break and walk to the next coffee shop. We fill out our decision matrix form, multiplying the scale with our evaluation of each decision factor, and finally sum up all factors – we get a total number for each single machine.
The machine who got the highest number of points is bought thereafter.
The only remaining question for me is: Are there really black washing machines :) ?
Giotto
[QUOTE=Giotto]Are there really black washing machines :) ?
Giotto[/QUOTE]
Yes there are. It's a very popular color for appliances.
[QUOTE=Brain666]
You yourself went trough some brainwork (others would call it risk assessment and Giotto being more a 'math guy' probably Decision Matrix) and figured that 'GF' are less risky.
[/QUOTE]
Brain666,
of course we all do make risk assessments in the broader sense of this expression, you even do make a risk assessment when simply crossing the street, but this isn't the subject of the discussion.
The subject of the discussion is, if anybody is able to [b]rate the risk of P4P girls.[/b]
I also have far more information about my GF than about any P4P, therefore whatever my risk assessment may be, it will be far more accurate for my GF than for any unknown P4P. You will argue that there is still some room for an error. Yes, that's true, this is real life and and there aren't many things that are for certain. But again, the faithfulness of GFs isn't the subject and even Giotto won't apply his risk assessment rules on his GF.
So your objection is use- and worthless because you expand the subject beyond rating risks of P4P.
P.S. Please let me add, that I find any comparison between Opebo and me very offensive for very obvious reasons.
[QUOTE=Giotto]To understand the fundamentals of safe sex risk management ( :) ) it seams to be necessary to explain the mathematical principles of a decision matrix.
[/QUOTE]
Giotto,
we all know what a decision matrix is as we all make decisions on a daily basis.
All this talking about a decision matrix is nothing but a distraction from the real problem : that your risk assessment rules are nonsense as they only focus on a very small subset of attributes/issues involved in rating the risk of a potential sex partner.
When buying a washing machine, you do know ALL factors that are important and you also have means to check most of them beforehand. But with P4P you DON'T know all factors and can not check them as well.
As my below example showed, your risk assessment already failed at the most simple case.
You still refuse to give us a straight answer to my question and to explain why still believe your irisk assessment is able to make an accurate assessment of the risk even though it dramatically failed in the below example. I know very well that ignoring unpleasant topics is a tactic that you and others often use when being cornered, but most people can see it and not giving an answer is an admittance of failure.
And then of course that does not help the debate about whether HIV truly exists (there are lots of retroviruses after all, all harmless to us except that one), and whether it can actually produce AIDS, alone or together with something else (a more and more attractive proposition).
It is allright to stick to the official gospel, but if you have an open and curious mind, you start reading, and thinking by yourself, and then it does not seem to add up so well. Nothing seems so sure, and a lot of things seem weird.[/QUOTE]
Thanks for an excellent report, but I just want to clarify a few things.
Firstly, there are other retroviruses that harm humans- some like HTLV1, 2 and 3, which from memory are very similar to HIV are believed to be involved in Leukemia, and of course how could anyone in Europe forget Rabies, another retrovirus!
Nothing is absolute in science, but there is so much evidence that the HIV virus causes AIDS that one would be a foolish to ignore it. There are always experts who can be found to say something to the contrary, but, well, they have their own agenda.
Now, PCR does work, that is because scientists have isolated the HIV genome ( an RNA strand). All PCR does is make many copies of a specific sequence of DNA/RNA, so that there is a sufficient quantity to run a test. In the old days, 20 years ago, a much greater sample was needed, but the invention of PCR meant that smaller samples, and obviously smaller viral loads could be detected and amplified.
However, there is still a time lag when there will not be enough HIV RNA for the 'probes' to detect. This is probably at least 5 days, maybe longer. PCR can yield false positives also, which is why so-called quick tests should not be relied upon. A positive from the initial PCR should be followed up with a conventional antibody test later on, as per the report. So testing a girl before you shag her does not mean she is HIV free, but she may have a smaler viral load and less chance of infecting you. But why go to these extremes? Covering up is easier!
Finally, just to make life worse, it has to be borne in mind that RNA viruses like HIV tend to make many more mistakes when replicating than DNA viruses. That means more mutations. OK, some of the mutations may not be viable, but like the influenza virus, which has a number of mutations and expresses various antibody markers, some may survive and make detection and treatment harder.
Did I say finally, sorry, this is finally. Take the relevant precautions. HIV is very difficult to get, otherwise the whole world would have it by now! BUT, if you are in a high risk group- like an IV drug user, homosexual or monger, then sensible precautions should be taken. I didn't mean to place mongers in that cohort, but girls we have sex with have usually had multiple sexual experiences and maybe with drug users, or bareback merchants!
Remember also, HIV-AIDS will probably eventually kill you, but so will syphilis, and if you give your girlfriend/wife a dose of something else, she probably will too!
[QUOTE=Giotto]To understand the fundamentals of safe sex risk management ( :) ) it seams to be necessary to explain the mathematical principles of a decision matrix.
Let us try to buy a washing machine:
To make a decision which of the 100 available products we take we first think about, on which factors we will base our decision. What do we think about, what can be important when we buy a washing machine?
Let’s assume, we are men, and have neither much knowledge about washing nor huge fantasy as women have sometimes. So we only find 4 decision factors:
Price
Functionality
Quality
Colour
The next step would now be to evaluate the scale to the factors, how important are they? That depends on our personal decision factor scaling assessment (:D). If we have enough money the price is not as important as if it would cost us a months salary. And for women the color might be more important than for us. I give it a try (please don’t attack me for that, it’s only a washing machine):
- Price……...……….4
- Functionality……2
- Quality……..…….6
- Colour…………....1
That means basically, that for me the quality is most important. I don’t give a shit what colour it is.
Now the evaluation of the single product, to be done with a point rating between 0 – 10, for each single decision factor.
Now we go to a washing machine shop and look at all products. The price ranges are in between Euro 200,00 and Euro 1,000.00 (to be honest, I have no idea what a washing machine costs). That means eg., that the Euro 200.00 machine gets 10 points, and the Euro 1,000.00 machine gets 1 point (we don’t want to waste money), above that all machines are ruled out – they get 0 points (a washing machine for more than Euro 1,000.00 – that would be crazy. I have my wife!).
Functionality is checked out and evaluated in a point rating between 0 – 10, based on the manuals and presentations we get in the shop. There is something like different washing programs - hell, I have no idea.
The quality – we develop ourselves to washing machine specialist during the visit in the shop(s), so we evaluate the quality – yes, in a point rating between 0 and 10 !!! Of course we are influenced in this evaluation by our personal preferences and experiences with brand names from the past.
Finally – the colour. White is nice but boring, 3 points. The silver one looks nice, 8 points. The black one – so so, 5 points.
Now we take a break and walk to the next coffee shop. We fill out our decision matrix form, multiplying the scale with our evaluation of each decision factor, and finally sum up all factors – we get a total number for each single machine.
The machine who got the highest number of points is bought thereafter.
The only remaining question for me is: Are there really black washing machines :) ?
Giotto[/QUOTE]
For the love of fuck, can we not end this bollocks here? There is no way to tell if a girl has a load of bad jizz in her womb, or a load of good jizz in her womb. It doesn't matter if she's a 19 year old Princess or a 50 year old ex bar girl from Secrets in Pattaya.
Does a decision matrix predict if a woman will be a good wife? With about 50% of western marriages ending in divorce, the best people involved in that decision matrix got it horribly wrong half the time, and that was weighing up a lot more evidence ( one would think) than age and the number of times she could have been fucked.
If she is a *****, sorry, I will go further, if she is not monogomous, there is no way that you can predict whose Jizz she has taken. It could be a smooth-talking charmer like Opebo, who may have more doses than a chemist's shop, or Asian Rain, or many others. Maybe some special young gogo girl has just fucked one man, one of these men, but there is an old saying: When you fuck someone, you are fucking everyone they have ever fucked! Gogo girl- virgin, meets charmer who has fucked 1000 women. That's 1000 chances of getting infected. A thousand people she has had sex with!
Like guys have stated, if she's yours, monogomous, and an ex sex-worker and has been checked out, you are sweet. If not, well, I hope you have special powers, because a decision matrix is about as much use as a chocolate fireguard- accept that, and accept you are wrong.
This is a PM I have just found to me from Giotto, quoting me and then his ramblings:
Careful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"All the recent reports are correct, and it has been known for a number of years that having another STI increases the chances of getting a dose of HIV. However, in that paper, the author fotgot to mention that it isn't only the 'open sores' STIs that cause a problem. Any STI- even the 'minor ones' like Chlamydia, will cause irritation in the lining of the urethra- this is where the virus gets in. Yeah, the sores can be an entry point, but that warm, moist, damaged tube is the go!
I'm not discounting anything that has been said- but just for the invincible men out there who think that not having sores gives them a better than fighting chance of not contracting HIV, bear in mind that if your urethra ( [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] tube) is infected or inflamed- even from too much sex with a clean girl, then the chances of infection are increased."
Petemcc,
careful with what you write here. "Warm, moist" is really nothing what matters...
I am heading some AIDS research projects. It is really about sores. And the existence of other STD's is definitely increasing the infection probability, because those STD's are creating those sores, they open the skin, a kind of transmitter function. We today know about some bacteria/fungus which cause sores and allows the virus to enter the body. It is (most likeky) the coexistence of the virus with other infectious bacteria/fungus which finally makes the difference of being infected or not.
An inflamed urethra itself is up to now not statistically significant identified as bearing any bigger risk than a not inflamed one.
I will not enter into this discussion.
I am not flaming here but this man is setting himself up as an expert. My degree is in biochemistry, with a minor in microbiology. I am currently doing a nursing degree. I have been involved with all matters medical for over 20 years now and take great interest in such things.
Anyone who has studied any anatomy will know that mucus membranes have a very, very close association with the circulatory system. The presence of sores is not necessary for a breach of the mucus membrane.
How he can possibly claim that an inflamed urethra is not statistically identified as bearing any greater risk is beyond me. I suppose there are research papers somewhere where scientists exposed healthy volunteers, some with inflamed urethras and some not, to the HIV virus suspended in body fluids! I think not.
Here is a quote from the CDC website ([url]http://www.cdc.gov/std/hiv/STDFact-STD&HIV.htm#WhatIs[/url])
Increased susceptibility. STDs probably increase susceptibility to HIV infection by two mechanisms. Genital ulcers (e.g., syphilis, herpes, or chancroid) result in breaks in the genital tract lining or skin. These breaks create a portal of entry for HIV. Non-ulcerative STDs (e.g., chlamydia, gonorrhea, and trichomoniasis) increase the concentration of cells in genital secretions that can serve as targets for HIV (e.g., CD4+ cells).
I think the CDC in the USA knows a lot more about it than you pal!
Giotto, leave the science to those who know. Just because you read a few websites doesn't mean you are suddenly an expert. There is a lot of shit on the web, because anyone can post anything they want- get the point!
Ok, using your ridiculous 'risk assessment'...
You meet two women:
Woman A is in her thirties, single for most of her adult life and been working as a hooker for the past ten years. On top of her sex work, she also goes out drinking and dancing every weekend and generally takes home a sexy stranger at the end of each drinking binge.
Woman B is also in her thirties, been married for 15 years and has only ever had sex with one man, her husband. She's a stay-at-home Mum to three kids, bakes muffins and volunteers for the local senior citizen's centre while the kids are at school.
Who is the biggest risk???
I guess it's pretty obvious which one would be considered 'safe' and I guess some of you would not think twice about bedding the 'good woman' without a condom.
But what if you had access to more information? (Information that you would NOT have access to when making a 'real life' risk assessment).
Woman A has never used IV drugs, consistently uses condoms with EVERY man/client that she sleeps with and has regular STI tests. On the very rare occasion that she picks up a bug, she abstains from sex until treatment is finished because she doesn't want to put anyone else's health at risk.
Woman B has never used a condom in her life, nor has she ever had an STI test, because she believes her husband is faithful to her. AND HER HUSBAND IS ONE OF THE MEN IN THIS VERY FORUM, WHO TRAVELS TO COUNTRIES WHERE HIV/STIs ARE RAMPANT AND FUCKS HOOKERS BAREBACK.
NOW which woman is safer????????
When it comes to 'risk assessment', there's only one question that you should be asking yourself.
"Has this woman (P4P or otherwise) ever had unprotected sex with a guy who assesses risk by any means similar to the Giotto method"?
If there's even the remotest possibility that the answer could be yes ....use a condom!!!
[QUOTE=Petemcc]This is a PM I have just found to me from Giotto, quoting me and then his ramblings:
[/QUOTE]
This isn't right! Private messages should be--private--unless by agreement with the sender they be made public.
[QUOTE=Retired Army]This isn't right! Private messages should be--private--unless by agreement with the sender they be made public.[/QUOTE]
Tough! The message should have been in the public arena. It was a reply to a positng I made in the public arena, and it concerned everyone in the public arena.
Trying to close off or scupper a discussion in secret is not on, but then again I'm British and Australian, we believe in openness and the truth!
[QUOTE=Petemcc]Tough! The message should have been in the public arena. [/QUOTE]
But it wasn't in the public arena. That's why it's called Private Message.
[QUOTE=Retired Army]But it wasn't in the public arena. That's why it's called Private Message.[/QUOTE]
You must have misunderstood me. The message he quoted in the PM was in the public arena, but he felt fit to reply to it privately, basically telling me what I had written was rubbish and that it was no longer up for discussion.
There was no need for a PM, especially a PM telling me that I am wrong. Anyway, I'm not arsed, at least people can visit the CDC website and make up their own mind based on research by a lot of clever people over a number of years on a number of people, as opposed to the opinion of someone else.
Dear Pete,
See fight club.
[QUOTE=Piper1]Pete - you say you were a cop (and that you beat people to near-death). Then you were a prison guard (and you say you fucked at least one of your prisoners). Now you're studying to be a nurse. I hope that for my sins, you won't be giving me a sponge-bath one day.
Screwing your mother-in-law ... (Jerry! ... Jerry! ...)
As for PM's - what does the "P" stand for?[/QUOTE]
Ex-prisoner, step-mother in law!
It's the cathetar I am looking forward to inserting!
I don't give a flying fuck if P stands for Private. I know this isn't the place to say this, but Gioto is being a complete fuckwit with this whole safe sex thing.
I didn't ask to receive a PM slagging me off. Just what the fuck do you think that he thought I would do? I care about people, but I don't give a fuck about twats, and if someone challenges me, I'll stand up and accept that challenge. I would have thought that my personality was obvious by now.
If someone wants to make a **** of themselves by pretending to be all knowing when in fact their knowledge is based upon some idiotic concept which for the life of me escapes me, then fair enough, but don't expect me to keep it secret.
I have had many PMs from members, and PMs are effectively for private information that is of no business to anyone else.
Please, for fuck's sake, read what the thread is all about, read what I said and then read what he said. This isn't private stuff, and it does not deserve any degree of privacy. Had he PMd me and said something like let's agree to disagree, then that's fair enough.
Anyway, as I said, I'm not arsed. I've been slagged off more times than I can care to imagine on this forum because I speak the truth, a concept which is unknown to many individuals. I don't care who I upset, in real life or here.
I LIKE to think that on matters of biology I can offer some informed insight. I may not be a high-powered business man who can travel the world and monger at will, and therefore cannot contribute with fantastic stories of wonderful sex, however, as I said before, I live my mongering life vicariously through this board and I contribute what I can for the benefit of all. As you well know, if you don't like what I have to say, ignore me, I'm not arsed.
Best wishes.
Pete
[QUOTE=Piper1]Dear Pete,
See fight club.[/QUOTE]
So we can't discuss safe sex in Thailand on the forum with Giotto?
Retired Army,
Private Messaging is for exchanging private info, chit-chat and suchlike. Trying to take an important public discussion on safe sex practices off the forum and into PM in order to save face is an abuse of PM, IMO.
Giotto made a considered, well-laid-out, well-intentioned post on his take on safe sex in Thailand. Others have pointed out glaring errors in his post. I'm very happy to be corrected when I'm wrong (it means that I've learnt something). Why aren't certain others? Why all this defence of bad info?
Pete - I took it to the fight club. Answer there. I nearly felt sorry for you after your post below, until you threatened me with inserting a cathetar.
If you really want to be nurse, learn how to spell catheter.
Terry - I don't rely on the net for info on safe-sex. I haven't read all of Giotto's or The Traveller's or others' arguments. No need to. I use the safest rule - always use a condom. Not fool-proof, but It's a simple and pretty effective practice.
As for Pete - I didn't think he would take it so hard (he's a tough guy and he's heard worse). Now I feel bad. Take it easy Pete.
[QUOTE=Piper1]Terry - I don't rely on the net for info on safe-sex. I haven't read all of Giotto's or The Traveller's or others' arguments. No need to. I use the safest rule - always use a condom. Not fool-proof, but It's a simple and pretty effective practice.
As for Pete - I didn't think he would take it so hard (he's a tough guy and he's heard worse). Now I feel bad. Take it easy Pete.[/QUOTE]
I didn't take it hard and I have replied on the Fight Club thread. As you will see, a nigfht shift, exercise, beer and 20 years of simply abusing inocent people has taken its toll on my spelling.
Oh, and I am not a tough guy. I have met many tougher than I, maybe not with as much heart, but tougher. Someone once said someting like 'all it takes for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing'. I don't know who, and again, at this time of my day I couldn't be arsed looking it up. If standing up for others and administering summary justice makes someone tough, then fair enough, I accept that title. However, I was only one of millions of ordinary people who affronted by the shit in society decided to try to make a difference. In my new career, despite my spelling deficiencies, I hope I can continue to make a difference, and by posting relevant information here, I also hope I can help people out.
Almost time for bed I think!
No, one more for the road.
[QUOTE=Petemcc]You must have misunderstood me. The message he quoted in the PM was in the public arena, but he felt fit to reply to it privately, basically telling me what I had written was rubbish and that it was no longer up for discussion.
There was no need for a PM, especially a PM telling me that I am wrong. Anyway, I'm not arsed, at least people can visit the CDC website and make up their own mind based on research by a lot of clever people over a number of years on a number of people, as opposed to the opinion of someone else.[/QUOTE]
I am not sure of the specifics of the message, but I think that anything said privately between two individuals should stay just that. Just my opinion.
[QUOTE=Retired Army]I am not sure of the specifics of the message, but I think that anything said privately between two individuals should stay just that. Just my opinion.[/QUOTE]
You're still missing the point. It's not private if I don't welcome it!
If people would care more about oters and practise safe sex, we wouldn't have to discuss this at this forum.
Some people will spoil the lives of many working girls and many mongers, but I guess that's life, they don't care and they will not stop as they only do think of them selfs...it's a shame.
I haven't made many contribution on this forum, but I guess that's just me beeing lazy.
Pete: I hear you mate. Take care.
[QUOTE=Petemcc]You're still missing the point. It's not private if I don't welcome it![/QUOTE]
I am a little slow and easily confused sometimes.
[QUOTE=Retired Army]I am a little slow and easily confused sometimes.[/QUOTE]
I have a cure for that. A nice Thai girl who wants to marry you. From what I have read, that is a very big wake up call!!!!
[QUOTE=La Chef]If people would care more about oters and practise safe sex, we wouldn't have to discuss this at this forum.
Some people will spoil the lives of many working girls and many mongers, but I guess that's life, they don't care and they will not stop as they only do think of them selfs...it's a shame.
I haven't made many contribution on this forum, but I guess that's just me beeing lazy.
Pete: I hear you mate. Take care.[/QUOTE]
There speaks the voice of reason. Welcome. Je pense qu vous etes Francais, n'est pas?
[QUOTE=Petemcc]There speaks the voice of reason. Welcome. Je pense qu vous etes Francais, n'est pas?[/QUOTE]sorry, [blue][Text deleted by Admin][/blue]
And I am right now in Indonesia.
[size=-2][u]EDITOR's NOTE[/u]: [blue]This report was edited to [u]remove text not in English[/u]. While I encourage contributions from all volunteers, the Forum is an English-only website. Please do not post reports in any language other than English. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue][/size]
[QUOTE=La Chef]sorry, [blue][Text deleted by Admin][/blue]
And I am right now in Indonesia.
[size=-2][u]EDITOR's NOTE[/u]: [blue]This report was edited to [u]remove text not in English[/u]. While I encourage contributions from all volunteers, the Forum is an English-only website. Please do not post reports in any language other than English. [i]Thanks![/i][/blue][/size][/QUOTE]Well what I said was that I don't really speak French, but it seems like the admin didn't like that I wrote it in French?
The girls in Thailand will not stop working when that Period comes. Large dicked farhangs will eat viagra on top of many beers and drill the hell out of these girls and cause them to bleed. Blood is the medium that spreads it and vaginal juices too. Sure, you are bagged but how about that manicure you got at the barber shop? The freshly cut cuticles, or you rub your eye after pulling that bag off your pinga. When they get the initial infection that comes before the 3 month detection time comes it is very contagious. I flat out asked a couple of girls if they were HIV+ after I did the "10,000thb boom boom, no condom, OK?" verbal test and got a yes. When I looked them in the eye and asked if they had it they stared down at the floor. OK, mix that with Avian Flu and we are in a heap of potential trouble. Girls that got it are more than happy to do you unbagged as they have nothing to lose and a grudge to bear. The Avian Flu can swap out dna with other viruses. There is little or no data on the possiblities, but it has been stated separately that both viruses can mutate, and the Avian flu CAN aquire characteristics from other Viruses. Imagine, a CSW girl goes home to the province where the chickens are all over the place. I can hear them clucking when I call the girls on the phone when they go back to Isan or up country. Imagine the highly contagious element mixing with the incurable time bomb. It is just a matter of time. Around Christmas in Pattaya the girls sit at the bars with their legs up and told me it was because of the HIV mosquitos. What is to stop a mosquito from spreading it just like malaria? Thailand keeps stats but many other Asian countries supress or don't have stats. Do a search and note how little stats are available, especially on the new sub-category e strain. Thailand has 3 major strains. The first strain was brought to LOS in the 80's from the US by Gays. The 2nd was another African strain brought to the Golden Triangle by Indian Gem merchants from Bombay and this spread from IV drug use and the prostitutes in Northern Myamar and Chiang Mai. It got to Bombay via African Sailors doing Indian ho's. The newest one is the Subcat-e, introduced by West Africans to Thailand in the late 90's. . I see many Africans near Nana. I saw some very frigtening data 2 years back on Sub Cat e, but I can no longer find it. I wish somebody from the medical community would post stuff on this site. The lack of data is almost suspicious, like they are trying to hide it. Maybe the religious right wants to kill the mongers off. The fact that Thai girls don't carry bags, and Indonesian girls can be arrrested for being a prostitute for possessing them shows how little has been done. The cute 22 year old mother in Jakarta told me the doctor comes and gives them "antee-beeotik" so bags are not necessary. This is a far cry from the Rio Girls that are always well stocked and experts at deploying a new bag for each act. In reality, WWI ended because of Influenza, not a truce. 500,000 died in the US from Avian Influenza between 1918 and 1919. With modern jet travel and airport transfer hubs imagine how fast it would spread. This site needs up to date stat.
I'm catching up on the threads, been away for a while, so much work. Anyway, WTF is the problem in this thread ? There is no such thing as safe sex, in Thailand or anywhere, ALL sex involves risks, but so what. As individuals we decide for ourselves where we sit on the risk situation. I consider Giotto as a freind, but i would not base my decisions on his risk assessment method, nor would i decide to base them all on posts by Petemcc, this is a forum for monging and thanks to OTH, RA, Traveller and others there are also some good discussions and points of factual info on Thailand, the culture and some experienced peoples points of view on them. This thread is stupid, it does nothing for anyone. If you want to learn the facts about STI's, HIV Aids and all that crap then do a google and get the info from some government or medical site from qualified people who at least have the right to claim their opinions should be valued.
Anyone coming to Thailand (or going anywhere for that matter) that needs to use a sex forum to decide wether its safe to go BB or not is nuts IMO.
Sex is dangerous, if you are serious about wanting to try to understand how dangerous, WSG is not the place to do it.
Rant over.
[QUOTE=Meaty]I'm catching up on the threads, been away for a while, so much work. Anyway, WTF is the problem in this thread ? There is no such thing as safe sex, in Thailand or anywhere, ALL sex involves risks, but so what. As individuals we decide for ourselves where we sit on the risk situation. I consider Giotto as a freind, but i would not base my decisions on his risk assessment method, nor would i decide to base them all on posts by Petemcc, this is a forum for monging and thanks to OTH, RA, Traveller and others there are also some good discussions and points of factual info on Thailand, the culture and some experienced peoples points of view on them. This thread is stupid, it does nothing for anyone. If you want to learn the facts about STI's, HIV Aids and all that crap then do a google and get the info from some government or medical site from qualified people who at least have the right to claim their opinions should be valued.
Anyone coming to Thailand (or going anywhere for that matter) that needs to use a sex forum to decide wether its safe to go BB or not is nuts IMO.
Sex is dangerous, if you are serious about wanting to try to understand how dangerous, WSG is not the place to do it.
Rant over.[/QUOTE]
Maybe I'm losing the plot but I could have sworn that the title of this thread is Safe Sex In Thailand. OK, that's about sex in Thailand, not culture, that is in other threads, and the culture one on Giotto's forum was mine by the way.
There is such a thing as safe sex- sex between two monogomous partners, safe that is as far as disease is concerned, not injury.
The whole point about this thread is that people still have misconceptions about what is and is not safe, or should I say safer, because I fully agree with you, sex with a person whose complete medical and sexual history you don't know has risks attached. As you also pointed out we are mongers and at the day we will be fucking strange women, and that carries risks even in a full body condom.
If you look back, I think you will find that my contribution to this Safe Sex thread started when some stupid things were said. This entire website, the Thailand forum and this thread are about finding women for sex, and educating others. Have a look, all over the site there are still stupid questions like can I catch HIV from kissing someone.
In an ideal world Meaty, everyone would do their own research and draw their own conclusions. However, at least once I have replied to a member who said that he did not understand a research paper, and it was quite an important one. Many people only know their dick from their elbow because generally their elbow doesn't fit in the places a dick does, and sometimes things, especially involving science/biology have to be broken down to simple forms. Everyday new things are being discovered. I myself for example had forgotten about chlorhexidine as an excellent 90% plus mouthwash to use after getting a mouthfull of Thai girl love juice.
Yeah, sex, mongering sex is risky, and all we can do is make it as safe as possible, and education is the only way.
Personally I don't give a flying fuck if you agree with my submissions, which basically are that a condom is the most effective way of NOT getting a dose of something, hopefully some people will have payed heed to what I said and consider every new girl a risk, be she an 18 year old so-called virgin, or a Catholic nun who has fucked off the church and taken up life as a barmaid in Thailand.
I'm bored typing now, and you're probably bored reading this, I'm off.
[QUOTE=Petemcc]..Maybe I'm losing the plot but I could have sworn that the title of this thread is Safe Sex In Thailand...[/QUOTE]
You are, my post was not only directed at you, and certainly not a flame of you, it was simply in relation to this Threads Topic, "Safe Sex in Thailand", IMO it is a pointless thread, containing nothing but heresay and peoples opinions edcuated/self-educated/unedcuated, on 'Safe Sex'. Nothing in this thread can be taken seriously, and anyone who bases there sexual practices on the posts in it needs help !
I also don't think anyone would disagree that wearing a condom, reduces the 'chance' of catching 'something'. But if a monger needs to know that from a sex board, again, something is wrong.
Chill out Pete, you appear to be taking things to heart, which weren't mean't in that way.
[QUOTE=Meaty]You are, my post was not only directed at you, and certainly not a flame of you, it was simply in relation to this Threads Topic, "Safe Sex in Thailand", IMO it is a pointless thread, containing nothing but heresay and peoples opinions edcuated/self-educated/unedcuated, on 'Safe Sex'. Nothing in this thread can be taken seriously, and anyone who bases there sexual practices on the posts in it needs help !
I also don't think anyone would disagree that wearing a condom, reduces the 'chance' of catching 'something'. But if a monger needs to know that from a sex board, again, something is wrong.
Chill out Pete, you appear to be taking things to heart, which weren't mean't in that way.[/QUOTE]
It's OK, I'm on my tenth beer now. 4-5 is argumentitive, anything after that is mellowing. I get your point!
Cheers!
Pete
I decided to erase the risk assessment report.
2 Reasons:
[b]1.) Possible Misunderstanding[/b]
When reading some responds to the report I realize that it can obviously be misunderstood as an advice, under which circumstances bareback intercourse could be acceptable. The Traveller has described this option correctly in a report below.
I first did not want to believe that, but obviously not many people have the time to read such a report slowly and in details – and then the whole message of the report get lost, worse – the message is reversed. And that is really the last thing I want to achieve with this report.
[b]2.) For What?[/b]
The report does not add any value to this forum. It is an intellectual orgasm for myself, and nothing more than that. I had fun to find out how my personal ways of thinking work, when I make a decision to go for oral sex with a P4P girl. But it is nothing more than that, only of value for myself.
----
I apologize to the forum for posting the risk assessment report.
[b]Please, Guys, use a condom, under all circumstances. No exceptions![/b]
Giotto
[QUOTE=Giotto]I decided to erase the risk assessment report....[/QUOTE]
And how many lurkers jaws have just dropped as they wonder how they're supposed to know the risk levels they're exposing themselves to now ?!?! :D :D I liked your report G, nothing wrong with it, just your take on your decision process, just like seomone saying #83 at Teens is the best Anal ever, but then i go and she doesn't offer it, that doesn't make the original post wrong or require it to be removed, it just requires the readers to apply common sense to posts.
I think I always understood the thing right.
No more or less.
And I believe that about 90 % of all mongers do nothing else then doing some kind of judgment how far to go with oral sex activities when deciding for P4P.
And the judgment was always for the decision of the level of oral sex and not for bareback sex as willingly falsely commented by some moralist icons.
It’s an illusion that the many mongers in LOS would behave like the father of all safe sex, moral icon The Traveler. In fact there is no time for 99,9999 % of all mongers to run each girl of our choice through a 15.000 baht 100% medical STD examination first. The reality is that except the few hand countable The Traveler’s alike the rest of us will continue with their risk assessments to allow ourselves a more or less bit of oral pleasure.
As I don't need any instructions for that, I can live as well with and without Giotto's Risk assessment report. But I enjoyed reading it and secretly comparing it with my own brainwork I am going through when thinking on the level of oral activity I do with a girl.
Regards
[QUOTE=Brain666]I think I always understood the thing right.
No more or less.
And I believe that about 90 % of all mongers do nothing else then doing some kind of judgement how far to go with oral sex activities when deciding for P4P.
And the judgement was always for the decision of the level of oral sex and not for bareback sex as willingly falsely commented by some moralist ikons.
Its an illusion that the many mongers in LOS would bahave like the father of all safe sex, moral ikone The Traveler. In fact there is no time for 99,9999 % of all mongers to run each girl of our choice through a 15.000 baht 100% medical STD examination first. The reality is that except the few hand countable The Travelr's alike the rest of us will continue with their risk asessments to allow ourselves a more or less bit of oral pleasure.
As I don't need any instructions for that, I can live as well with and without Giotto's Risk asessment report. But I enjoyed reading it and secretly comparing it with my own brainwork I am going through when thinking on the level of oral activity I do with a girl.
regards
Brain666[/QUOTE]
Two things:
Firstly, I apologise for in advance. By ikon do you mean icon? I appreciate that English isn't your first language and nobody gets any stick for their English here, but I am just checking if that is what you meant. You see, clever bastards are coming up with words all the time that I have never heard of! I am just making sure that you meant icon as in an admired person who is held up as being the symbol of a particular practice. If that is what you meant, I don't think anyone here claimed to be an icon, they just claimed to have specialist knowledge or an informed point of view. As I said, it is no criticism, it's just that these replies can get pretty heated over minor misinterpretations of what is being said.
Secondly, most of this thread was not directed towards oral sex. I know in places it has been mentioned that certain areas only allow oral sex with a dental dam. That is because of legislation and OH+S, and governments always go overboard with policies and procedures and err on the side of caution.
Oral sex is a relatively low risk activity, apart from if she has open sores/blisters, then stay away! However anything is possible. generally, as long as you are not swallowing great amounts of love juice, your own natural flora will fuck-off most invaders. And, because of the mucus on the mucus membranes, a quick rinse with a good mouthwash like chlorhexidine will destroy any bacteria that may be trying to penetrate the mucus of the mucus membrane. I'm not telling you anything new but your mouth and throat are full of 'friendly' bacteria, or other commensal bacteria that can't do much until you are compromised in some other way with an illness.
I am Mr careful, and I could not begin to consider not going down on some sweet WG's pussy- as long as she wasn't bleeding, or smelly, or had sores.
However, and this is the point- IF every monger wore a condom, then, assuming the WG didn't fuck anyone else, oral would be a pleasure that could be partaken off freely and without worry.
In effect, we can fuck a girl who is infected with a condom and be safe, but licking one out who has a dose or two, or three can be a risk, but only a risk if someone has BBS them. That is why it is selfish, because barebackers may say that others will wear condoms, but nobody is going to use a dental dam on a foreign WG.
So mate, continue with the oral fun, and generally, with a woman, if she has an infection down there, you will be able to smell something wrong-if it is established.
Enjoy the posts and keep contributing. Our combined knowledge is what makes this forum work. Some information may be shit, but knowledge is power, and the more we know, the more we can decide what we want to accept/reject and/or follow.
Regards
Pete
You should tell this to the indonesian forum Pete.
[QUOTE=Petemcc]Two things:
Firstly, I apologise for in advance. By ikon do you mean icon? [/QUOTE]
Yes I meant Icon and I corrected it with some other type errors.
Regarding oral sex I just wanted to get some more real world practice in the discussion. Of course this is the safe sex thread and naturally the most safe would be to withstand from all p4p. But then we wouldn't have signed up for this board either.
My moral icon is mainly The Traveler, promoting the completely risk less way of doing. Of course he is right with that if absolutely risk less is what it should be. But again it isn't the case in 99,9999 % of the real P4P situations every day in LOS. So we will continue our brainwork before thinking on going for tongue play or going 'down under' how much we can justify.
regards
Brain666
[QUOTE=Brain666]
...
It’s an illusion that the many mongers in LOS would behave like the father of all safe sex, moral icon The Traveler. In fact there is no time for 99,9999 % of all mongers to run each girl of our choice through a 15.000 baht 100% medical STD examination first. The reality is that except the few hand countable The Traveler’s alike the rest of us will continue with their risk assessments to allow ourselves a more or less bit of oral pleasure.
...
[/QUOTE]
Brain,
thank you for seeing me as an icon :)
Actually I was just expressing my point of view of the whole thing - and I am entitled to it as much as anybody else here (like you e.g.) - which simply was that there is no way to access the risks involved and that nobody should be less careless just because he believes to know anything about his P4P girl.
As Meaty already said, everybody has to use his common sense. No need for Giotto to delete his report. But I still think that he was sending out the wrong message by telling us that different "security levels" apply depending on a few attributes of the girls. I gave a very simple example how fast Giotto's risk assessment can fail.
Nevertheless, claiming that 99,9999% of the real P4P situations every day in LOS do differ from "safe sex" situations is quite ambitious. How do you know what other people do in their bedrooms ? I don't and can only refer to what many girls have told me, but I have talked to many over the time.
You would wonder how many guys only want a blowjob plus a bit intercourse - missionary, doggy and/or girl riding him - for about 15-20 mins before being satisfied. Not all want DATY, stick their fingers in and so on. Also not all girls do allow it, some may be worried about long fingernails etc.
Therefore giving out numbers like that is a huge exageration. We simply don't know.
And finally, too many guys are fixated on pussy and tits, but women do have many more erogenous zones which are safe to "play" with and will get the girl into the right mood.
[QUOTE=Petemcc]
...
In effect, we can fuck a girl who is infected with a condom and be safe
...
[/QUOTE]
Pete,
even though we obviously share many points of view regarding safe sex I have to object.
Many people don't know that Chlamydia, Syhillis and Clap e.g. are smear infections. Due to this way of transmission, a condom doesn't offer 100% protection against those infections as they are often transferred during foreplay.
Giotto's "advice" to stick your bare fingers deep into a girl's pussy is the best way to contract any of these deseases. Not to speak of the already mentioned risk to get in contact with blood and the risk, mentioned by Giotto himself, to transfer nasty stuff when rubbing your eyes with the very same fingers. DATY of course poses an ever higher risk of contracting deseases.
So, condoms do not provide 100% security but it's the best thing we have so far and reduces the risk dramatically, therefore always wear one !
A new friend sent this quote to me today:
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
[b]Bertrand Russell[/b]
Giotto
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Pete,
even though we obviously share many points of view regarding safe sex I have to object.
Many people don't know that Chlamydia, Syhillis and Clap e.g. are smear infections. Due to this way of transmission, a condom doesn't offer 100% protection against those infections as they are often transferred during foreplay.
Giotto's "advice" to stick your bare fingers deep into a girl's pussy is the best way to contract any of these deseases. Not to speak of the already mentioned risk to get in contact with blood and the risk, mentioned by Giotto himself, to transfer nasty stuff when rubbing your eyes with the very same fingers. DATY of course poses an ever higher risk of contracting deseases.
So, condoms do not provide 100% security but it's the best thing we have so far and reduces the risk dramatically, therefore always wear one ![/QUOTE]
Point taken, but it offers 100% protection to your dick if your dick NEVER comes in contact with her juices, first hand, or second hand, so to speak! We have established that Chlamydia etc can infect other mucosa, and of course fingering a girl and rubbing her juices on an uncovered dick is a good way to get a dose of something nasty. Similarly DATY poses a risk, but with good oral hygeine (and not brushing your teeth for at least 4 hours before performing DATY) and care afterwards, the risk is minimised. Also a good saliva flow out of our mouths = less of a flow of her juices into our mouths.
I think that most people here realise, well, apart from the obvious few, that sex with someone you don't know, be that P4P or the girl next door, is risky. A condom is inpenetratable to all but sharp objects. Part of the testing phase is an attempt to pass an electric current through it, and if electrons can't get through, not much else should be able to squeeze through, at least of biological size.
FYI, I am currently researching the efficacy of mouthwashes like chlorhexidine ( which will destroy most bacteria, or at least reduce the count so much as they will have little chance of catching hold) in acting as a preventative measure post DATY, as opposed to letting the mormal mouth flora deal with it. Particularly, I am researching whether the repeated use of mouthwashes can significantly reduce the numbers of friendly mouth bacteria, so letting an opportunistic host from DATY get hold. I am leaning towards the use of such mouthwashes for 3 reasons:
1. People do get STI/STD of the mouth, so the commensal flora can't be that good.
2. They use the stuff in hospitals for patients.
3. Pathogen's will probably be relatively few and their numbers should be significantly reduced by the use of chlorhexidine post DATY.
An important point that I forgot to mention is the abuse of antibiotics. Some mongres may take unperscribed antibiotics thinking that they will stop them getting a dose. Apart from resistance issues, the problem is that most antibiotics do significantly reduce the population of the normal mouth flora, so letting potential pathogens ( from DATY etc) take hold. Interesting, prevention could cause infection!
Anyway mate, I'm not disagreeing with you, I am just saying that by exercising due dilligence, if possible, risks should be minimal.
I'll get back on the mouth research bit when it is done.
Pete
[QUOTE=Petemcc]Similarly DATY poses a risk, but with good oral hygeine (and not brushing your teeth for at least 4 hours before performing DATY) and care afterwards, the risk is minimised. Also a good saliva flow out of our mouths = less of a flow of her juices into our mouths.[/QUOTE]
Pete, can I just add...
I know some people here aren't too concerned about the risk to the [i]sex worker[/i] during DATY, but for those who are, please be aware that although other STIs are certainly a risk, the greatest risk for the woman receiving DATY is herpes. From memory, one in every six people have HSV-1 (the coldsore virus). No longer separate infections, HSV-1 can cause HSV-2 (genital herpes) and vice versa, meaning that your coldsore could give a sex worker genital herpes. HSV is not only contagious during the outbreak, but for a period before and after - so you may be about to get a coldsore and not know it, unwittingly putting the girl at risk during DATY.
And don't forget, the same applies to a woman with HSV-1 giving a guy an uncovered blowjob.
[QUOTE=Giotto]I decided to erase the risk assessment report.
2 Reasons:
[b]1.) Possible Misunderstanding[/b]
When reading some responds to the report I realize that it can obviously be misunderstood as an advice, under which circumstances bareback intercourse could be acceptable. The Traveller has described this option correctly in a report below.
I first did not want to believe that, but obviously not many people have the time to read such a report slowly and in details – and then the whole message of the report get lost, worse – the message is reversed. And that is really the last thing I want to achieve with this report.
[b]2.) For What?[/b]
The report does not add any value to this forum. It is an intellectual orgasm for myself, and nothing more than that. I had fun to find out how my personal ways of thinking work, when I make a decision to go for oral sex with a P4P girl. But it is nothing more than that, only of value for myself.
----
I apologize to the forum for posting the risk assessment report.
[b]Please, Guys, use a condom, under all circumstances. No exceptions![/b]
Giotto[/QUOTE]
Giotto
If you really mean what you said here, I salute you as a big man, honestly, so if it is heart felt, thanks, well done-enough said.
Pete
[QUOTE=Rubber Nursey]Pete, can I just add...
I know some people here aren't too concerned about the risk to the [i]sex worker[/i] during DATY, but for those who are, please be aware that although other STIs are certainly a risk, the greatest risk for the woman receiving DATY is herpes. From memory, one in every six people have HSV-1 (the coldsore virus). No longer separate infections, HSV-1 can cause HSV-2 (genital herpes) and vice versa, meaning that your coldsore could give a sex worker genital herpes. HSV is not only contagious during the outbreak, but for a period before and after - so you may be about to get a coldsore and not know it, unwittingly putting the girl at risk during DATY.
And don't forget, the same applies to a woman with HSV-1 giving a guy an uncovered blowjob.[/QUOTE]
Of course Rubber, you are 100% correct. One only has to watch the ad campaigns on national television in Australia to realise how common herpes is- the figures you have quoted.
You are also correct. Often ( but not always as you will notice) the focus has been on the man. I think in this thread somewhere I stated that we have the responsibility/ duty of care to the WGs, especially those who may not fully understand the consequences. I get the occasional cold sore, and during that time I don't kiss my wife anywhere near any mucosa. I would hope that other mongers take the same care with their significant others, and it follows on, unless you are a complete prick, that you should do the same with a WG.
Thanks for reminding us of that Rubber.
[QUOTE=La Chef]You should tell this to the indonesian forum Pete.[/QUOTE]
I never visit that forum, and have never been there. What do you suggest I look at and tell them?
I gather that most WGs there don't want condoms because they feel it degrades them, or something, so please enlighten me and I'll check the threads out and add my 5 cents (Australian)
Thanks
Pete
Sorry, couldn't PM you!
[QUOTE=Petemcc]I never visit that forum, and have never been there. What do you suggest I look at and tell them?
I gather that most WGs there don't want condoms because they feel it degrades them, or something, so please enlighten me and I'll check the threads out and add my 5 cents (Australian)
Thanks
Pete
Sorry, couldn't PM you![/QUOTE]I was just speaking with sarcasm. I didn't want you to literaly telling them. Many people already tried without any success.
Anyway, take care maty.
[QUOTE=Petemcc]
Anyway mate, I'm not disagreeing with you, I am just saying that by exercising due dilligence, if possible, risks should be minimal.
[/QUOTE]
Pete,
I didn't disagree with you either, just wanted to point out that people should know about the way of transmission of certain deseases for maximum protection.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]And finally, too many guys are fixated on pussy and tits, but women do have many more erogenous zones which are safe to "play" with and will get the girl into the right mood.[/QUOTE]
This is very true, often i will take out my wallet and fiddle with the 1,000 Baht notes, for some there is only a small effect, but i have seen others go wild :D
Ha ha Absolutely fantastic!! I have noticed that on many an occasion!
A woman is like a spike (syringe). If you gonnah shares it you gotstah go first!
Hi guys
This is a link to the China thread where Santa posted the latest story about circumcision and HIV, and I have posted my comments. I am sure it will cause some debate, especially here.
[url]http://internationalsexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?t=938[/url]
HIV risk halved by circumcision, finds US agency by Donald G McNeil Jr
Circumcision appears to reduce a man’s risk of contracting AIDS from heterosexual sex by half, US government health officials said on Wednesday, and the directors of the two largest funds for fighting the disease said they would consider paying for circumcisions in high-risk countries.
The announcement was made by officials of the National Institutes of Health as they halted two clinical trials, in Kenya and Uganda, on the ground that not offering circumcision to all the men taking part would be unethical. The success of the trials confirmed a study done last year in South Africa.
AIDS experts immediately hailed the finding. “This is very exciting news,” said Daniel Halperin, an HIV specialist at the Harvard Center for Population and Development, who has argued that circumcision slows the spread of AIDS in the parts of Africa where it is common.
In an interview from Zimbabwe, he added, “I have no doubt that as word of this gets around, millions of African men will want to get circumcised, and that will save many lives.”
Uncircumcised men are thought to be more susceptible because the underside of the foreskin is rich in Langerhans cells, sentinel cells of the immune system, which attach easily to the human immunodeficiency virus, which causes AIDS. The foreskin also often suffers small tears during intercourse.
But experts also cautioned that circumcision is no cure-all. It only lessens the chances that a man will catch the virus; it is expensive compared to condoms, abstinence or other methods; and the surgery has serious risks if performed by folk healers using dirty blades, as it often happens in rural Africa.
Circumcision is “not a magic bullet, but a potentially important intervention,” said Kevin M De Cock, director of HIV/AIDS for the World Health Organization. Sex education messages for young men need to make it clear that “this does not mean that you have an absolute protection,” said Anthony S Fauci, an AIDS researcher and director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Circumcision should be used with other prevention methods, he said, and it does nothing to prevent spread by anal sex or drug injection, ways in which the virus commonly spreads in the US.
The two trials, conducted by researchers from universities in Illinois, Maryland, Canada, Uganda and Kenya, involved nearly 3,000 heterosexual men in Kisumu, Kenya, and nearly 5,000 in Rakai, Uganda. None were infected with HIV. They were divided into circumcised and uncircumcised groups, given safe sex advice (although many presumably did not take it), and retested regularly.
The trials were stopped this week by the NIH Data Safety and Monitoring Board after data showed that the Kenyan men had a 53% reduction in new HIV infection. Twenty-two of the 1,393 circumcised men in that study caught the disease, compared with 47 of the 1,391 uncircumcised men. In Uganda, the reduction was 48%. NYT NEWS SERVICE
[QUOTE=Duniawala]HIV risk halved by circumcision, finds US agency by Donald G McNeil Jr
<cut>
[/QUOTE]
Hi Duniawala,
I feel this announcement has just a tiny effect on me.
1. Already circumcised.
2. Don't take statistically high risks with my dick anyway.
3. Licking out a girl's pussy will have the same level of danger as before.
4. I can feel some tiny level of comfort when getting a BBBJ only, because the unknown but small level of risk might be even smaller.
Fellows, I have paid the price that one occasionally pays for enjoying our hobby the natural way. Yes, I have the Clap. Or rather I may have either clamydia or the clap, or both. The discharge is white, not yellow, so I think it could be just clamydia. In any case I thought it might be useful to bring up this common and easily aquired ailment on our 'Safe Sex in Thailand' thread.
I have taken just this morning the 1 gram dose of Zithromax I always take for these maladies. Unfortunately, I ate a meal no more than 30 minutes later, which is contraindicated, so I'm a bit worried about the efficacy of the cure. Does anyone here have any other anecdotes or advice about these, our two most common sexually transmitted ailments? Do you prefer Zithromax or the shot in the buttocks (Ceftriaxone)? Any other treatments? Which one do you think is easier on the gut, Zithromax or the Shot?
I fear Zithromax's tendency to kill off the good gut organisms - a friend of mine was taking antibiotics for food poisoning and ended up with pseudomembranous colitis, which luckily for him was cured with metronidazole. I always eat a lot of yoghurt after taking antibiotics. Anyway, time to share your Clap experiences.
o****: ye sound like david hume. great to see ye spouting philosophy as the white stuff runs down yer legs.
there are some nasty does to be had in the kingsom of thailand. one reason is because the infected, people like you, and the hookers, don't get proper medical attention but prefer a jab in the arse or a yellow pack chemist. if i was you, i'd get a proper medical check up and follow the proscibed course of action. but i'm nae you. i am as clean as the spring heather on ben nevis. you, on the other hand, now have insides as dirty as a bangkok sewer. ye better get checked fae other souvenirs as yer at it.
ah dinnae ken what yer waffling about yoghurt for. some swear by blueberries but they probably cost a pretty penny there in thailand. do ye intend tae fuck on and give them more than they bargained for?
happy fucking.
[QUOTE=Opebo]Fellows, I have paid the price that one occasionally pays for enjoying our hobby the natural way. Yes, I have the Clap.
<cut>
Anyway, time to share your Clap experiences.[/QUOTE]
Doesn't your post rather belong to the UNSAFE Sex Forum? :-)
Who did you catch it from?
Do you thoroughly inspect girls pussies for cleanliness and panties for stains prior to sex? I suppose any goo coming out could be mistaken for the last guys come juice?
I have had Clamydia once in my life. Wasn't sure if was from BBBJ from girl at the Grace Coffee shop or from uncovered sex with girl back in the home country (2 weeks earler), who claimed to have checked and be totally free of it (but can't trust women to tell the truth). As there was no other unprotected activity I was inclined to blame the BBBJ even though the doctor ignorantly stated that it was impossible to catch from oral sex. Could have been the toilet seat I suppose :-)
Don't expect I will ever catch another STD, but I still get BBBJs, so lightning could strike twice.
How many girls are you intending to infect shortly? (since you didn't mention this issue) or are you intending a short holiday from barebacking?
I presume not, since covered sex is so pathetic for you.
Should I be in "Fight Club" or am I only mildly provocative.
I belive Errythromycin is really good stuff (and I used to be able to buy in Thailand), but its hard to get these days as the health authorites are keeping it back for those bacteria that have developed immunity to other antibotics. The best antibotics are therefore not available. Too much exposure of the best antibotics would increase likelyhood of resistant bacteria mutations becoming the dominant strains.
Isn't it easier just to see the doctor and get a prescription or injection in the arse.
[QUOTE=Opebo]Fellows, I have paid the price that one occasionally pays for enjoying our hobby the natural way. Yes, I have the Clap. Or rather I may have either clamydia or the clap, or both. ...
I have taken just this morning the 1 gram dose of Zithromax I always take for these maladies...
[/QUOTE]
Opebo,
how could this happen to such an "experienced" bareback monger like you ?
I see it's not the first time you experience one of the side effects of your activities and you obviously don't have the guts to see a qualified medic, or are you just cheap ?
BTW, what would you do if it would have been HIV ?
Would you still go bareback, spread it and kill others ?
Or would you finally take responsibility for your actions and do the right thing ?
Hmm, I guess not since there is no right or wrong in Opebo's world.
[QUOTE=The Traveler]Opebo,
how could this happen to such an "experienced" bareback monger like you ?[/quote]
Well, you see, The Traveler, I placed my penis in the anus-holes of numerous women, and moved it to and fro for, on average, perhaps 20 to 30 minutes. The microbes were no doubt living in one or more of the aforementioned anuses (I looked it up - it isn't anii), and a number of them found their way into my urethra, where they lived and bred for many generations before being killed off by the mighty Zithromax. A gripping tale and a Manichean struggle or mere meaningless happenstance? I suppose it depends upon your point of view.
[quote]I see it's not the first time you experience one of the side effects of your activities and you obviously don't have the guts to see a qualified medic, or are you just cheap ?[/quote]
Neither.. I do that every other time, as I think it is good to 'switch up' antibiotics. The price is actually about the same.
I was happy to answer your practical questions, but please post your useful anecdotes of STDs, The Traveler, and confine disputation and hypothetical to The Fight Club.
Opebo,
you did not answer all of my questions !
Additionally my questions do have Safe Sex as subject and therefore belong to the "Safe Sex in Thailand" section. But thanks for your advice, I will attend to it as much as you attend to our advice of not going bareback.
BTW, I am astonished that you can't determine if a question is rhetorical or not, thought you are a smart guy (at least you believe so).
I found this in the Indonesia Surabaya thread:
[QUOTE=Hm Hw]Stupid me did not use a condom and I think I might have an STD now as I've been having burning sensations while [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord112][CodeWord112][/url] and even sometimes when I'm not [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord112][CodeWord112][/url]. Can anyone recommend an English speaking STD clinic in Surabaya I can go to? Or should I go to Jakarta? This is the first time in my life I've contracted an STD so its a little scary for me. Yes I know I was stupid not to use a condom.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Opebo]Sorry to place this reply in this section, but perhaps it is urgent. Hm Hw, simply take a one time 1 gram dose of Zithromax (generic name azithromycin), which should be available at the pharmacy.[/QUOTE]
Just to let you know whith whom we deal here. I feel this is crossing the line of non acceptability. Maybe we will soon fnd a thread "Dr. Opebo in Thailand" where all barebackers can consult him.
Here the link to the report:
[post]548729[/post]
sexual diseases can kill and should not be treated lightly or in a cavalier fashion. think what you like about doctors but a medical check up and medical expertise is essential when dealing with them.
the philippines, for example, relies too heavily on trips to the chemist and chemists are a hugh business there. if you go to a chemist shop there, your life is in the hands of an under paid 18 year old babe.
is this what o**** is doing? some of the barebackers will have throughly filthy pussies and only a lunatic would dip his wick there. there are no quick fix solutions. microbes want to live too and they evolve to fight off these silver bullets. this is especially so as many of the locals will not finish the course of treatment.
anyone who seels they have a sexual disease should get it medically exmained and follow through on the prescribed treatment.
Dear Tiger, I was only passing on information that I originally learned on this forum! I too used to go to the doctor and get the shot every time I got the Clap, but it really isn't necessary.
I do still go in for the shot about every other time in the interest of not taking any one antibiotic too frequently, but Zithromax is a mainstay of mongering.
[QUOTE=Billy Ibrox]There are some nasty does to be had in the Kingsom of Thailand. One reason is because the infected, people like you, and the hookers, don't get proper medical attention but prefer a jab in the arse or a yellow pack chemist. If I was you, I'd get a proper medical check up and follow the proscibed course of action.[/quote]
The 'jab in the arse' [b]is[/b] the prEscribed course of action, Billy.
[quote]BUt I'm nae you. I am as clean as the spring heather on Ben Nevis. You, on the other hand, now have insides as dirty as a Bangkok sewer.[/quote]
No, I was cured by Zithromax, Billy.
[quote]Ah dinnae ken what yer waffling about yoghurt for. Some swear by blueberries but they probably cost a pretty penny there in Thailand.[/QUOTE]
The yogurt is an attempt to re-introduce the 'good' bacteria into the intestinal tract that is inevitably killed off by the anti-biotics, along with the targeted microbes. One wishes to avoid a florescence of the 'bad' gut bacteria, as it can lead to pseudomembranous colitis, a more serious condition than the Clap by far.
o****, only pigs get cured.
if you have no got a clearance after a full blood and [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] sample from a qualified doctor, you are not cured.
[quote=billy ibrox]if you have no got a clearance after a full blood and [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] sample from a qualified doctor, you are not cured.[/quote]
no, in fact the treatment applied causes the symptoms to cease and not return, so the microbes have been killed off. untill the next exposure of course!
full blood and [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] sample, for clamydia/gonorrhea! what ridiculous overkill. but i understand that such wasteful shenanegans probably assuage your sexual guilt. happily i am free of such feelings, and am no more embarrassed by the clap than by a headcold.
i apologize if this posting appears confrontational, but i do think that the psychological aspect of stds is worth discussing - after all these are mostly incredibly minor ailments, except for the one that is incredibly hard to catch, so the obsessive attention we give them is quite telling.
[QUOTE=Opebo]...I apologize if this posting appears confrontational, but I do think that the psychological aspect of STDs is worth discussing...[/QUOTE]
Opebo,
you need a psyche to do so, therefore you aren't qualified.
free and anonymous testing readily available in most home countries. do people not understand why?
i forget the test where they stick a stainless steel wire swab down mr happy, but am pleased to report no longer done. just a [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] test nowadays. tg! .
the qualified doctors go ape shit over popping pills, because chances are you may have copped a resistant strain. and if you pop something, test results after you feel it has not made any difference, may/will mask things. i am not qualified, so stop here. but it would be sweet to picture a pre-tablet [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] sample container in the new 'liquids' fly bag rule, and the poor customs guys freaking out. one doctor commented to the business man, your wife may get suspicious with condom sex for the week, but she will be bloody more aggro if she picks up something, and won't have to think too hard. and these bright business sods. really believe they can see doctor 'have a shot' that works instantly, and go home as if nothing has happened.
do yourself a favour. get checked back home. easy as [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] (1 wk turnaround and no guessing if a thimble trick was pulled). get a hep be vaccination before leaving if you have not already. and cover up. sun cancers can kill you too. 20 years later.
reading the forum's, i read that basically the girls, now are not checked. not monthly. nada. bar owners lie. now 20 years ago, i believe it was a dodgey something, but at least something. with protection, hiv with protection is unlikely, but there are a host of other social nasties. or even occupational overuse syndrome. i begin to suspect this 'user pays' health scam is or has damaged social good. one mentioned 50, 000 bt for a check up. rubbish its medi-pimping. should be cheap as, apart from the bloodwork. 20 years ago the girls waved a gubby bit of paper saying mr, me clean. yeah laugh at that.
because right now, i see it as pot luck, and barowners are reptiles.
now, you take things unknown. how things have gone downhill. so is the real determinant customer complains, ok she kicked out or moved on to someplace elsewhere. dog eat dog world we live in.
[quote=opebo]no, in fact the treatment applied causes the symptoms to cease and not return, so the microbes have been killed off. untill the next exposure of course!
full blood and [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] sample, for clamydia/gonorrhea! what ridiculous overkill. but i understand that such wasteful shenanegans probably assuage your sexual guilt. happily i am free of such feelings, and am no more embarrassed by the clap than by a headcold.
i apologize if this posting appears confrontational, but i do think that the psychological aspect of stds is worth discussing - after all these are mostly incredibly minor ailments, except for the one that is incredibly hard to catch, so the obsessive attention we give them is quite telling.[/quote]
you are such a simple ****. a mere 8 days or so after announcing you have a dose of something you bareback some poor girl up the arse.
how the fuck do you know you are no longer infectious? if you had any idea about how treatment regiemes work you would know, as billy said, that the only sure way is a negative blood test or swab. not only can many bacterial infections be asymptomatic, especially when they are there in small numbers, but often there is not a 100% kill rate, especially when amateurs play doctor and know what they are doing, apparently.
i think you have hit the absolute bottom of the shit pile and the top of the pile of irresponsibility.
Dear Policeman,
The medicament I utilized, like most cures for gonorrhea and clamydia, is a one time dose. Therefore, the fact that I went from drip drip to dry as a bone and stayed that way is ample evidence of a full recovery - had there been residual microbes, they would have bloomed again to recreate the drip-drip. Therefore, my actions seven days hence were not transmissive. Not that it particularly matters if it was, and not that it is any of your business.
[QUOTE=Opebo]Dear Policeman,
The medicament I utilized, like most cures for gonorrhea and clamydia, is a one time dose. Therefore, the fact that I went from drip drip to dry as a bone and stayed that way is ample evidence of a full recovery - had there been residual microbes, they would have bloomed again to recreate the drip-drip. Therefore, my actions seven days hence were not transmissive. Not that it particularly matters if it was, and not that it is any of your business.[/QUOTE]
I was a policeman many years ago. I am a biochemistry graduate with a minor in microbiology and a student nurse, but none of that matters. Why do yo think there are so many antibiotics on the market? Have you ever heard of resistance? Are you so dumb to believe that because there are no symptoms you are not infectious? Many, many diseases are infectious when the carrier shows no signs, take HIV as an example. HAve you ever heard of sub clinical infections? Have you ever studied microbiology? Clearly not. But I forgot, in Opebo world, Opebo is always right, everyone else is wrong, fucken hell, the world must be so simple for you, a bit like your knowledge of microbiology. You may think you are a smart ****, full of rhetoric, and able to construct half-decent posts, but really, you are ignorant and dangerous. I could go on, but I am just shaking my head in disbelief at your stubborness and stupdity.
And, if it's none of my business, why post that you caught a dose on this forum. Is it some sort of boast, or bait or something? You are the one who told the world your business, so don't expect any sympathy or privacy.
[QUOTE=Petemcc]I was a policeman many years ago. I am a biochemistry graduate with a minor in microbiology and a student nurse, but none of that matters. Why do yo think there are so many antibiotics on the market? Have you ever heard of resistance? Are you so dumb to believe that because there are no symptoms you are not infectious? Many, many diseases are infectious when the carrier shows no signs, take HIV as an example. HAve you ever heard of sub clinical infections? Have you ever studied microbiology? Clearly not. But I forgot, in Opebo world, Opebo is always right, everyone else is wrong, fucken hell, the world must be so simple for you, a bit like your knowledge of microbiology. You may think you are a smart ****, full of rhetoric, and able to construct half-decent posts, but really, you are ignorant and dangerous. I could go on, but I am just shaking my head in disbelief at your stubborness and stupdity.
And, if it's none of my business, why post that you caught a dose on this forum. Is it some sort of boast, or bait or something? You are the one who told the world your business, so don't expect any sympathy or privacy.[/QUOTE]
Some time ago I caught gonnhorea from a BBJ in Bangkok (yes it does happen) and went to a hospital back in Hong Kong when the symptoms appeared. They diagnosed it and I had to take the antibiotics right in front of them. They then told me to come back after a week (They had registered my ID card and phone number). They told me if I thought that when the symptomes are gone that I wouldn't need to return, they would have me arrested. BTW they of course also did a blood test which proved negative after a long 3 weeks. So much about this low life self diagnoser giving false advice to others and possibly infecting every one.
tiger and pete
i think it was established some time ago that
a/ o**** is always right in o****land.
b/ o**** does not care about the consequences of his actions.
c/ o**** does not care what we think of him.
d/ o**** does not care about anyone, but himself.
so, what's the point of stating the obvious? everyone of the slightest intelligence on this board sees him for what he is. if someone is stupid enough to admire him and/or follow in his footsteps, there's nothing anyone can do to change that.
Opebo
Please don't ever think of coming to New Zealand. On behalf of all working girls here.
And if you do, please make it one that has the balls to call the police and report and have your ass convicted of trying to procure sex without a condom.
You filty, disrespectful horrid little man.
It is people like you that help spread the AIDS virus and lots of other nasties by relying on the lack of education in the countries you monger in.
May your next check up reveal prostrate cancer and put a final end to your mongering days
[quote=sasha coffee]opebo
please don't ever think of coming to new zealand. on behalf of all working girls here. [red] selfish and sexist. are kiwis something more important? are kiwi hookers girls or women? [/red]
and if you do, please make it one that has the balls to call the police and report and have your ass convicted of trying to procure sex without a condom. [red] ass or arse?. is it against the law to have comdomnless sex in kiwiland? [/red]
you filty, disrespectful horrid little man. [red] no need for this further sexism and dwarfism. he pays to fuck low life, not to respect them. [/red]
it is people like you that help spread the aids virus and lots of other nasties by relying on the lack of education in the countries you monger in. [red] alarmist misinformation. the lack of education of prostitutes/drug addicts and their type are far more important, as are the ac/dc merchants. check out sid the sexist on ladyboys epididemics in pattaya. [/red]
may your next check up reveal prostrate cancer and put a final end to your mongering days [red] [url]http://www.prostatecancerfoundation.org/[/url] assumning you mean prostate cancer, a "healthy" sex life might help.[/quote]if o**** is just doing a wind up ok. if he fucks these bottom feeders condomless, do we really care about them? let's face it. prostitutes are the bottom of the human barrel. we rent them to abuse them and then dispose of them.
o****'s fun and games should not give the green light for propaganda. the hookers of thailand are a sea of infections because they are the low life with mo means of negotiation. if a thai hooker does not do what we want, we move on and get a better performing monkey to dance to the tune we pay for.
sid the sexist has already told other less than prime cuts of meat where they stand. we pay them to open their [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] flaps and to open their mouths only when we want to put our dicks into it. there is nothing worse than a babbling sex toy.
Contrary to my name, I am not into arse fucking, bareback or otherwise.
Zithromax might work for Opebo, but it is relatively expensive. Having observed the medicine prescribed by a Doctor many years ago for a dose, I now use Norfloxacin 400mg (1 tablet only) when I have a problem, and it works within hours. Costs 4bt a tablet.
[quote=old thai hand]tiger and pete
i think it was established some time ago that
a/ o**** is always right in o****land.
b/ o**** does not care about the consequences of his actions.
c/ o**** does not care what we think of him.
d/ o**** does not care about anyone, but himself.
so, what's the point of stating the obvious? everyone of the slightest intelligence on this board sees him for what he is. if someone is stupid enough to admire him and/or follow in his footsteps, there's nothing anyone can do to change that.[/quote]
well said, best to ignore his posts and he'll eventually move to other thread or hopefully just disappear from the board.
[QUOTE=Sasha Coffee]Opebo...
May your next check up reveal prostrate cancer and put a final end to your mongering days[/QUOTE]
Why would a diagnosis of prostrate (sic) cancer put a final end to one's mongering days? Prostate cancer is, after all, generally a slow moving and fully treatable cancer.
I was not trying to finger point or talk of morals.
As you say I'm just a hooker with no morals.
I just find this sought of behaviour totally ridiculous and very offensive, in my personal opinion and it is only an opinion Opebo appears to be taking advantage of sex workers in a country where the education of sexually transmitted diseases is quite limited and the poverty level high.
Not only is he taking advantage of the WG in this country and putting them at risk of infections he is also putting all other mongers at risk.
As for the protrate cancer I was only making an statement, since Opebo feels he is above needing a doctors advice and has decided to self medicate to treat his STD's it would also appear that it would be a long time before he bothered to check any irregular happenings in his genital area.
[quote=billy ibrox]if o**** is just doing a wind up ok. if he fucks these bottom feeders condomless, do we really care about them? let's face it. [color=green]prostitutes are the bottom of the human barrel. we rent them to abuse them and then dispose of them.[/color]
o****'s fun and games should not give the green light for propaganda. the hookers of thailand are a sea of infections because they are the low life with mo means of negotiation. if a thai hooker does not do what we want, we move on and get a better performing monkey to dance to the tune we pay for.
sid the sexist has already told other less than prime cuts of meat where they stand. we pay them to open their [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] flaps and to open their mouths only when we want to put our dicks into it. there is nothing worse than a babbling sex toy.[/quote]here is the prove that not only one or two lower of the lowest mongers are around here. it's getting ugly. [color=red]those who desperately try to make a living because they are born on the wrong side if the zero luck scale, at least are humans[/color]. you don't qualify.
no more comments from my side on this issue!
[QUOTE=Billy Ibrox] ... bottom feeders ... do we really care about them? [/QUOTE]Yes, Billy, some human beings care. Scum might not.
[quote=tiger 1]here is the prove that not only one or two lower of the lowest mongers are around here. it's getting ugly. [color=red]those who desperately try to make a living because they are born on the wrong side if the zero luck scale, at least are humans[/color]. you don't qualify.
no more comments from my side on this issue![/quote]so some who ppen their [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] flaps and drink sperm for an easy living are human and those of us who pay taxes and are not junkies are not? if you want to start a charity for prostitutes, their heroin habits, their pimps and their lies, go ahead. if you think we should send money to isaan sperm drinkers, fine, send your own. but don't go building altars to these [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] flap openers. we pay them to get them to leave after fuck them. they are fuck toys, pure and simple. their opinions are as worthless as themselves. just think what any self respecing thai, the shop and hotel assistants included, thinks of your companion.
if o**** is stupid enough to dip his wick uncovered into the mucous these "women" carry. let him or stop him. but don't preach. just remember he is not the only one. then we have sid the sexist saying pattaya is overrun by ladyboys. and we have the ac/dcs of soi 6 and boyztown. anyone who does not cover up is looking for a very painful aftermath.
i always cover up and am careful which of these bottom feeders i allow suck my dick and rim my arse. actually, i have more fun and games in store for them just to see how far they wil ldegrade themsekves for a few bob.
and tiger, go check out the murders of the ipswich prostitutes. their "friends", the mr nice guys, killed them. to me, the idea of having a prostitute as a friend is more bizzarre than anything i will pay them to do.
thai hookers might have a low opinion of o****, assuming they bother to think of anything but dick sucking. but do you really think they admire a sucker who treats and pay them better than the ordinary had working women of pattaya, who work 7 days a week in stores etc. they are the ones deserve the bulk of your money. the others are only good for jerking off on.
Today my PM box was spammed by Tampaman45 a no posts yet member since August 06 titeling "HIV cure By Dr H. R. Clark".
Whoever also received this, here some links:
[url]http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/01/drclark.htm[/url]
[url]http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/clark.html[/url]
[quote=billy ibrox]so some who ppen their [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] flaps and drink sperm for an easy living are human and those of us who pay taxes and are not junkies are not? if you want to start a charity for prostitutes, their heroin habits, their pimps and their lies, go ahead. if you think we should send money to isaan sperm drinkers, fine, send your own. but don't go building altars to these [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] flap openers. we pay them to get them to leave after fuck them. they are fuck toys, pure and simple. their opinions are as worthless as themselves. just think what any self respecing thai, the shop and hotel assistants included, thinks of your companion.
if o**** is stupid enough to dip his wick uncovered into the mucous these "women" carry. let him or stop him. but don't preach. just remember he is not the only one. then we have sid the sexist saying pattaya is overrun by ladyboys. and we have the ac/dcs of soi 6 and boyztown. anyone who does not cover up is looking for a very painful aftermath.
i always cover up and am careful which of these bottom feeders i allow suck my dick and rim my arse. actually, i have more fun and games in store for them just to see how far they wil ldegrade themsekves for a few bob.
and tiger, go check out the murders of the ipswich prostitutes. their "friends", the mr nice guys, killed them. to me, the idea of having a prostitute as a friend is more bizzarre than anything i will pay them to do.
thai hookers might have a low opinion of o****, assuming they bother to think of anything but dick sucking. but do you really think they admire a sucker who treats and pay them better than the ordinary had working women of pattaya, who work 7 days a week in stores etc. they are the ones deserve the bulk of your money. the others are only good for jerking off on.[/quote]
billy
i take it that you are a good protestant boy from glasgow by your name, i am a good protestant boy from belfast.
this may not be the right place for this, but i just want to pull you up a bit on what you said.
mate, for many years, especially as a cop in manchester, i thought prostitutes were druggie scum, and indeed they were. i even got mixed up with one in oz who fucked me over. however, i have also used the services of wg professionals here (oz) and these non-druggie girls were very good and very professional.
sure, it is a very lucrative and some may say easy profession, and for many, the easy way out. i agree, the real thai girls who work too many hours a day to make a 'moral' living deserve more, but the girls who sacrafice their dignity to earn easy money shouldn't be chastised so much and abused like you do. i am sure none of us thinks of ourselves as complete twats, or hideously ugly to girls, but remember that these girls( ok by choice), will fuck anyone for money, and to be honest if they pretend to enjoy it, and if we, as mongers get something out of it, then it is a service.
billy, i'm not saying these girls are angels, but why the abuse? for fuck's sake man, they're people, not fucken armed robbers or suicide bombers. just because they provide a service at what many would describe as the lower end of the spectrum, doesn't mean they don't deserve respect. the people who sweep the streets and pick up shit also deserve respect as they do the jobs we don't want to do. we're protestants mate, hopefully not 'wee frees' . that other church imposed strict and hipocritical moral values on everything, and the extremists on our side were worse, even shunning the evil drink, but think about it billy, we are the ones who protest against the stupid morals. you don't need to slander wgs, they're people, people who generally will cause you no harm, so compare them to celtic fans or armed robbers, or car thieves, or... i could go on. give them a break mate, they keep you happy.
pete
[quote=billy ibrox] then we have sid the sexist saying pattaya is overrun by ladyboys. .[/quote]i have only been on and off the forums recently due to travels down here in los, so i am not quite up to speed with the ongoing debate. however, i am very interested to learn, without reading too far back, wtf my observation has done to warrant an inclusion in your post?? if you would like to bring me into fight club to flame me then plaese do so and make it clear. but dont try involving me in your petty battles. i neither care nor want anything to do with them.
sid
pattaya report 319: [quote=sidthesexist]my last night in patts tonight. ive been in and out of the place over the last 3 weeks and what strikes me the most this time round is the amount of russians and ladyboys. theyre everywhere. sid[/quote]
[quote=sidthesexist] however, i am very interested to learn, without reading too far back, wtf my observation has done to warrant an inclusion in your post?? sid[/quote]sid: we were discusisng safe sex and you tell us the ladyboys are everywhere. that means lots of guys are fucking them and/or being fucked by them. so your post is very relevant as you are on the scene. your post means cover up and watch out. it is very very useful.
petemcc: i have seen the celtic scum with ladyboys in pattaya on everal occasions and i would expect nothing more from those soap dodgers.
shit happens just like it happened to those five in ipswich. we should use them abuse them and move on. we all know their lives are rotten. but don't get involved. and don't get suckered.
o**** admits he doesn't give a fuck. maybe he is a wind up. but there are many o****s out there. anyone who does not cover up out of self interest is thick and probably a tommie celtic ****.
as for the ladies, shed no tears for them. they sold their souls away a long time ago. fuck them and forget them. ships passing in the night.
i notice the complaints about stray dogs and crying babies in pattaya. that is the future. the place is just too valuable. and as there are planefulls of chiense coming, say goodbye to the life we knew. grab the crumbs while ye can.
Billy,
Aren't all prostitutes "women" before they are prostitutes?
Do you actually think they had a dream as little girls to become prostitutes?
Most Thai women do it because they have a kid and their husband left them, probably beat them up too from time to time. Family is the number one worry of Thai ladies, their parents, brothers and sisters and their kids.
I respect them, highly. To prostitute oneself in sacrifice for one's family is an admirable think to do, and not as easy as you would think.
I would think again before judging these ladies by the work they do. Some of them are exceptional women and very fun to be around.
(of course, I wouldn't expect someone like you to see this seeing as to how you refer to them)
[QUOTE=Snookynic]Billy,
Do you actually think they had a dream as little girls to become prostitutes?
Most Thai women do it because they have a kid and their husband left them, probably beat them up too from time to time. Family is the number one worry of Thai ladies, their parents, brothers and sisters and their kids.
)[/QUOTE]
Although true to some degree, I also know some FL that do it simply for the money. No kids or family involved. She didnt really need the money from prostitution to survive as they had decent day jobs already but just so she could buy nicer clothes, bigger TV's, buying a car instead of riding a moto. etc.
Then again I've also met some that simply like to f**k, so why not get some money out of it.
May not be a big % of them but they are out there.
PT
[QUOTE=Kcuf39]Barebacking pussy maybe, but barebacking anally? Is that not taking the risk a bit far. How available is barebacking in your experience, Would like to fill some thai fuck toy pussy with lots of cum in Feb but still not sure. Must have been great in the '70 before all the Aids shit hit the fan. At least back then you could fuck bareback for ten day and fill at least 15 pussys and probably get nothing that a short course of antibiotics wouldn't clear![/QUOTE]
Kcuf, in my opinion anal sex is safer than vaginal for the penetrative party, because with the use of plenty of KY and proper preparation, there should be no anal bleeding, particularly with an experienced reciever. Therefore very little infective juice should contact one's member. By contrast the vagina produces copious amounts of lubricant, though to be fair it is only marginally infective.
[QUOTE=Nicfrenchy]Billy,
Aren't all prostitutes "women" before they are prostitutes?
Do you actually think they had a dream as little girls to become prostitutes?
Most Thai women do it because they have a kid and their husband left them, probably beat them up too from time to time. Family is the number one worry of Thai ladies, their parents, brothers and sisters and their kids.
I respect them, highly. To prostitute oneself in sacrifice for one's family is an admirable think to do, and not as easy as you would think.
I would think again before judging these ladies by the work they do. Some of them are exceptional women and very fun to be around.
(of course, I wouldn't expect someone like you to see this seeing as to how you refer to them)[/QUOTE]
Well said! I couldn't agree more.
Anyway prostitution is just another job the same as any other.
Its just that the girls have to put up with something sometimes ugly (the guy, his behaviour, clenliness, etc.) to get more money.
If I could earn ten times what I earn now, I would put up with some ugliness in my job no doubt, at least for a couple of years!
Remember also that many classy P4P girls choose their customer.
They don't just go with anyone.
Some working girls are really into a lot of sex.
So why not get good money for it at the same time.
There are many motivations for a sex worker.
Us mongers who love to be their customers have no right to look down on them.
Mongers who treat the girls, in general, with contempt should equally be held in contempt.
O.K. if the girl is pathetic at her profession or a con artist, that is clearly a reason for holding her in contempt.
I have a great deal of respect for girls who are able to give me a GFE when we have only just met a few minutes, often without any apparant acting. Sometimes they just have the ability to get into having a good time quickly.
[quote=mick licker]prostitution is just another job the same as any other.
..if i could earn ten times what i earn now...remember also that many classy p4p girls choose their customer quote]mick: become a hooker or a drug dealer if money is all that floats your boat. most women do not become hookers. it is the dregs of society do. check out the five hookers killed in ipswich. all smackheads. the pattaya hookers are no different, shabu, secret boyfreinds etc.
[quote=mick licker] i have a great deal of respect for girls who are able to give me a gfe when we have only just met a few minutes, often without any apparant acting.[/quote]your gfe has probably been rimming my arse 5 minutes earlier or has had someone dump a load on her. that is why they are being run out of pattaya. they are regarded as trash and so are their gentlemen boyfriends/grandpas.
o****: you have probably more venereal diseases than you can imagine. while it is true that butt fucking a bottom feeder might be safer for the fucker than the fuckee, it is still a dangerous pursuit as it abandons due care. but you probably don't care until it affects you.
anyway, i have had my say in this safe sex thread. the pussy cats here show why a fool and their money are so easily parted. hookers exist to be fucked and forgotten and maybe foold as well. if you have spare cash, give it to someone who puts in an honest day's work. hookers are already dead inside. they are a waste of time and money. good only as spem catchers and arse wipes.
[QUOTE=Opebo]Kcuf, in my opinion anal sex is safer than vaginal for the penetrative party, because with the use of plenty of KY and proper preparation, there should be no anal bleeding, particularly with an experienced reciever. Therefore very little infective juice should contact one's member. By contrast the vagina produces copious amounts of lubricant, though to be fair it is only marginally infective.[/QUOTE]
Penetrative anal sex is subject to the risks of herpes and hepatitis B, among other things. They aren't fatal, but then again, they do not go away with a simple shot.
Billy,
You might think that hookers are dead inside, but reading your posts you are fill of bitter hatred, obviously someone taught you some lessons the hard way.
I don't think hookers are dead inside, I believe anyone can be dead inside the occupation has nothing to do with it.
Bitterness, Hatred and condemnation of fellow human beings lifestyles are what causes someone to be dead inside.
Oh and by the way, if you hate hookers so much you should stop paying them to do their job that way you can create unemployment and eventually if you can convince the whole world of mongers to stop paying for sex the hooker that you seem to detest and hate so much will be no longer.
[size=-2][b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue][/size]
[QUOTE=Billy Ibrox]This thread is for safe sex, something I believe in.
Daddy07: All prostitutes are bottom feeders. There is no need to pity the bottom feeders I pick up. I pay the going rate, get my rocks off, pay them and get them to leave. JUst like when I use a public urinal, I [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] in it, zip up, wash my hands and leave. No difference from urinal to urinal. The people you should feel sorry for are those who entertain delusions about these creatures.
I ask you to take the five wretches killed in Ipswich as a good example. They were "good girls gone bad" and were killed, it seems, by someone who had notions of having a close relationshiop with them, by "good punters" in other words. Hookers exist for our amusement and they should not be regarded as ordinary women. They are fuck toys, pure and simple. And we should simply fuck and pay them and never trust them for a single minute.
It is much more enjoyable to spend money on sport and on normal leisure than on bottom feeders. They exist just for us to empty our bags into them and then get on with better things. We don't vandalise a urinal when we use it. Why should we disrespect human ones?
Sasha Coffee: You have never bought a prostitute. You are a prostitute. Your "views" are irrelevant.[/QUOTE]
Cover up is the only good advice. We always have issues with posters who make claims that they have devised a safe uncovered sex technique.
But Billy, you are one of the punters we worry about the most on this forum. You have an obsession with violence, and in particular punting violence. And you (under a previous cyber-incarnation) made the worrying leap from bright optimist to dark cynic. You later (under another cyber-incarnation) described Thai sexworkers as being on the same level of sentience as pet puppy dogs, and later still made (and quickly deleted) what what appeared to be a suicide note post in which you described having sex with and murdering a transvestite. And now you are back, with the same de-humanizing talk about sexworkers. Very, very worrying.
It's a tragedy you fell out with with your old forum pal, Joe Zop (who seemed to be a calming influence on you). Your downfall started at that juncture.
Here is JZ's take on the ground rules of punting in Thailand:
[QUOTE=Joe Zop]It's not terribly difficult to understand that this is all a game to separate you from as much cash as possible and still manage not to take it as something that makes sex workers less than human. If you pay her and she fucks you she's holding up her end of the bargain, and all the rest is whatever you make of it. If you head to LOS having read this forum and knowing what the scene is and still end up supporting some Thai honey from afar under the illusion it's love, then it's you who deserve ridicule or censure, not the TG.
There's a difference between knowing how things work and heaping scorn on sex workers because of it.[/QUOTE]
My viewpoint exactly. I just wish I could articulate as well as Joe.
Been reading the dark stuff on this thread, way too heavy for me. Best item of worldly advice I ever got was from an older retiered working girl when she said "All women are born with a goldmine, the unfortunate thing is that 95% of them only sit on it"
Now to my real question: I am wanting to load up on about 3 grams of the anitbiotic Zythromax just before I leave Bangkok, to chase away anything that may have made it's way through the first two lines of defence (condoms and copious washing with soap and water). Can a person get Antibiotics in a Bangkok pharmacy with a perscription from a doctor?
[size=-2][b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted because the content of the report was [u]largely argumentative[/u]. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. [i]Thank You![/i][/blue][/size]
[QUOTE=Opebo]Dear Policeman,
The medicament I utilized, like most cures for gonorrhea and clamydia, is a one time dose. Therefore, the fact that I went from drip drip to dry as a bone and stayed that way is ample evidence of a full recovery - had there been residual microbes, they would have bloomed again to recreate the drip-drip. Therefore, my actions seven days hence were not transmissive. Not that it particularly matters if it was, and not that it is any of your business.[/QUOTE] Can you get it with out pescription since I have gonorrhea?
[QUOTE=Billy Ibrox]This thread is for safe sex, something I believe in.
Daddy07: All prostitutes are bottom feeders. There is no need to pity the bottom feeders I pick up. I pay the going rate, get my rocks off, pay them and get them to leave. JUst like when I use a public urinal, I [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] in it, zip up, wash my hands and leave. No difference from urinal to urinal. The people you should feel sorry for are those who entertain delusions about these creatures.
I ask you to take the five wretches killed in Ipswich as a good example. They were "good girls gone bad" and were killed, it seems, by someone who had notions of having a close relationshiop with them, by "good punters" in other words. Hookers exist for our amusement and they should not be regarded as ordinary women. They are fuck toys, pure and simple. And we should simply fuck and pay them and never trust them for a single minute.
It is much more enjoyable to spend money on sport and on normal leisure than on bottom feeders. They exist just for us to empty our bags into them and then get on with better things. We don't vandalise a urinal when we use it. Why should we disrespect human ones?
Sasha Coffee: You have never bought a prostitute. You are a prostitute. Your "views" are irrelevant.[/QUOTE]Your thoughts and your views on things around you appeared like they come from a public urinal.
Johnson994,
If you're in Thailand, get yourself into a pharmacy and ask the pharmacist for advice (and adhere to the advice - it's an antibiotic treatment which means that the symptoms will clear, lulling you into a false sense of security, before the virus fucks off). If you're in farangland it's the GUM (or equivalent) clinic. The staff at these places tend to be drama queens - the policy is to scare their clients into adopting safe sexual practices (and quite rightly). Don't worry about your visit to one of these clinics coming back to haunt you: You don't need a referral, and can use a made-up name if you want to.
Billy,
Upgrade yourself from the 4-600bt places in which you like to rest your head to somewhere like the Areca (about 1k). These types of hotels have small, quiet (usually empty) free-to-use gyms. No gayness, but nobody to show off to (gayness) if that is part of your gym trip. Just a no-fuss, get fit workout.
Friends tell me the diving is better from the small koh's because the sewage doesn't float that far. But don't you know all this stuff already?
Try to keep a balanced profile on here this time. You're one of the brightest, wittiest posters when you're not working yourself up into all of a foaming-at-the-mouth blather (or 'sweating the small stuff' as you like to describe it).
[QUOTE=J Jack]Been reading the dark stuff on this thread, way too heavy for me. Best item of worldly advice I ever got was from an older retiered working girl when she said "All women are born with a goldmine, the unfortunate thing is that 95% of them only sit on it"
Now to my real question: I am wanting to load up on about 3 grams of the anitbiotic Zythromax just before I leave Bangkok, to chase away anything that may have made it's way through the first two lines of defence (condoms and copious washing with soap and water). Can a person get Antibiotics in a Bangkok pharmacy with a perscription from a doctor?[/QUOTE]Ops, meant without a perscription from a doctor. Sorry.
The one in Pattaya will have you in and out, complete with blood work, consultation and medications in less than an hour. It might cost $1500 bht. The Bumragrad in Bankok might take overnight and cost more for the results but it is worth having them open a file for you. Rich Arabs and Germans take their wives there to have babies. Don't self medicate. Symptoms might dissapear and you could still have it.
[QUOTE=J Jack]Originally Posted by J Jack
Been reading the dark stuff on this thread, way too heavy for me. Best item of worldly advice I ever got was from an older retiered working girl when she said "All women are born with a goldmine, the unfortunate thing is that 95% of them only sit on it"
Now to my real question: I am wanting to load up on about 3 grams of the anitbiotic Zythromax just before I leave Bangkok, to chase away anything that may have made it's way through the first two lines of defence (condoms and copious washing with soap and water). Can a person get Antibiotics in a Bangkok pharmacy with a perscription from a doctor?
Ops, meant without a perscription from a doctor. Sorry.[/QUOTE]
J Jack, Thailand is still a relatively free country in some ways, and yes, you can by Zithromax at any pharmacy without a prescription. It is usually in the 550-575 baht range for one box of 6 500 mg capsules.
And great point about the vaginal gold.
[QUOTE=J Jack]Ops, meant without a perscription from a doctor. Sorry.[/QUOTE]
What a fantastic way of helping the little bastards gain antibiotic resistance. Do yourself a favour, ask a doctor or pharmacist about your plan and I'm sure they'll let you know how foolish it is.
Antibiotics aren't a vaccination or innoculation, they don't create immunity from disease. Stop fucking with antibiotics and then there won't be so many strains of resistant bacteria around.
ps I don't like using web resourses, but this may help with the other danger of using antibiotics without medical supervision.
[url]http://www.drugs.com/zithromax.html[/url]
[QUOTE=J Jack]Been reading the dark stuff on this thread, way too heavy for me. Best item of worldly advice I ever got was from an older retiered working girl when she said "All women are born with a goldmine, the unfortunate thing is that 95% of them only sit on it"
Now to my real question: I am wanting to load up on about 3 grams of the anitbiotic Zythromax just before I leave Bangkok, to chase away anything that may have made it's way through the first two lines of defence (condoms and copious washing with soap and water). Can a person get Antibiotics in a Bangkok pharmacy with a perscription from a doctor?[/QUOTE]
3 Grams is too much to take. Two 500 gm tablets (one dose) is normal prescription to cure Clamydia as the antibotic stays in your system for several days.
Opebo could potentially have still infected others since period recommended by doctors to wait till be safe after taking Azithromycin is up to 2 weeks. Having no drip is not necessarily a cure proof.
Some time ago I used a condom but caught Conjuctival Clamydia (which means in the eye and not the dick. Was cured by one dose of Azithromax (over several days - not immediate). Dick was protected by condom but fingers up the pussy were not. Unfortunately didn't know which girl I got it from but Clamydia is highly contagious and some doctors indicate that it is even possible to catch it in some countries from certain insects (like bush flies).
So guys, be warned. After fingering girls you don't know well, be very careful to wash hands thoroughly, before rubbing your eyes.
There is something to be said for curing yourself in terms of keeping your condition secret, but on the other hand you really need to be sure what you have got. So for those that go down the cure yourself route, best to get a subsequent test (after perhaps 2 weeks) to ensure that all STDs are absent. If catching Clamydia, there is increased risk of catching something else concurrently as well.
[url]http://www.thailandguru.com/health-hiv.html[/url]
[QUOTE=Petemcc]Point taken, but it offers 100% protection to your dick if your dick NEVER comes in contact with her juices, first hand, or second hand, so to speak! We have established that Chlamydia etc can infect other mucosa, and of course fingering a girl and rubbing her juices on an uncovered dick is a good way to get a dose of something nasty. Similarly DATY poses a risk, but with good oral hygeine (and not brushing your teeth for at least 4 hours before performing DATY) and care afterwards, the risk is minimised. Also a good saliva flow out of our mouths = less of a flow of her juices into our mouths.
I think that most people here realise, well, apart from the obvious few, that sex with someone you don't know, be that P4P or the girl next door, is risky. A condom is inpenetratable to all but sharp objects. Part of the testing phase is an attempt to pass an electric current through it, and if electrons can't get through, not much else should be able to squeeze through, at least of biological size.
FYI, I am currently researching the efficacy of mouthwashes like chlorhexidine ( which will destroy most bacteria, or at least reduce the count so much as they will have little chance of catching hold) in acting as a preventative measure post DATY, as opposed to letting the mormal mouth flora deal with it. Particularly, I am researching whether the repeated use of mouthwashes can significantly reduce the numbers of friendly mouth bacteria, so letting an opportunistic host from DATY get hold. I am leaning towards the use of such mouthwashes for 3 reasons:
1. People do get STI/STD of the mouth, so the commensal flora can't be that good.
2. They use the stuff in hospitals for patients.
3. Pathogen's will probably be relatively few and their numbers should be significantly reduced by the use of chlorhexidine post DATY.
An important point that I forgot to mention is the abuse of antibiotics. Some mongres may take unperscribed antibiotics thinking that they will stop them getting a dose. Apart from resistance issues, the problem is that most antibiotics do significantly reduce the population of the normal mouth flora, so letting potential pathogens ( from DATY etc) take hold. Interesting, prevention could cause infection!
Anyway mate, I'm not disagreeing with you, I am just saying that by exercising due dilligence, if possible, risks should be minimal.
I'll get back on the mouth research bit when it is done.
Pete[/QUOTE]
I posted this same question in the Safe Sex Forum, but received no response.
I was wondering if it's worthwhile to cleanse your dick after a BBBJ and before putting on the rubber for the covered main event.
I was thinking about getting one of those wet wipes and dousing it with disinfecting alcohol (or even those anti-bacterial lotion), clean the member with it after a BBBJ before I put on the rubber and having intercourse.
Rationale: With the wipe and all, you get rid of all the saliva which otherwise would be caught in the rubber - it's almost like filling the rubber with virus/bacteria/germs, and then sticking your dick into it before you dive in.
Any response?
Diver
Diver 69,
Very interesting question.
I would love to get an answer to that myself.
[QUOTE=Diver69]I posted this same question in the Safe Sex Forum, but received no response.
I was wondering if it's worthwhile to cleanse your dick after a BBBJ and before putting on the rubber for the covered main event.
I was thinking about getting one of those wet wipes and dousing it with disinfecting alcohol (or even those anti-bacterial lotion), clean the member with it after a BBBJ before I put on the rubber and having intercourse.
Rationale: With the wipe and all, you get rid of all the saliva which otherwise would be caught in the rubber - it's almost like filling the rubber with virus/bacteria/germs, and then sticking your dick into it before you dive in.
Any response?
Diver[/QUOTE]
If you have had a BBBJ you have already exposed your dick to whatever bacteria/virus were in her mouth/saliva, so cleaning your dick before putting the condom will have a minimum effect.
That would be like having a copious meal, with several full fat dishes, and after that taking a white coffee with semi-skimmed milk because you want to look after your weight.
[quote=gladiator]if you have had a bbbj you have already exposed your dick to whatever bacteria/virus were in her mouth/saliva, so cleaning your dick before putting the condom will have a minimum effect.
that would be like having a copious meal, with several full fat dishes, and after that taking a white coffee with semi-skimmed milk because you want to look after your weight.[/quote]
i am not an std expert, but i have a lot of experience, a lot of medical knowledge, and am involved in a medical profession.
the chances of getting hiv from a bj are to be frank so small that they could be ignored, so that rules out a foreskin. other stds need the mucus membranes, which basically means down your jap's eye. the best thing you could do after a bbbj and before donning a rubber is having a [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url]. [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord109][CodeWord109][/url] from your bladder is sterile, salty, and will irrigate the entire urethra. you can make an excuse that you want to wash your knob before putting it on, or that you just want a [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url], but really, if you are worried, having a [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] is the best defence, and then give it a wash.
i haven't been able to do much research lately, but frankly, a girl having an std of the throat is quite unlikely. if she has, it should be obvious because her mouth will not exactly be nice- bit like someone with a sore throat.
really, and i am not saying that bbbj are risk free, but according to my latest textbook, they come pretty near the bottom for chances of getting something horrible. remember, saliva is actually quite nasty to most organisms, well mostly bacteria. sure, many of us, or all of us at one time get a cold, but that is a virus, and the various viruses ( including the influenza virus) are very, very good at getting past defences. however, most bacteria are fucked off by the saliva and the commensal bacteria in the mouth. but, as i said before, there are still risks.
frankly, sex with a condom is 100% risk free, if the condom is used properly, there is no prior sexual contact with genitilia, and the condom doesn't break, but in reality, that doesn't happen, so nothing is risk free. the only risk free sexual practice, apart from abstaining, is a totally monogomous relationship ( i wish they had spell check here!), but as mongers, that isn't an option. in other words, it is about risk minimisation.
to be honest, if you cum with the bbbj, you will probably wash anything undesirable away. i'd have a [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url], as i said, have a quick wash, and get on with it- if i was trying to be very, very careful, but again as i said, stds of the mouth are pretty uncommon, even with twats like o**** who fuck while infected.
when i go back, i have a new test for a bg:
'do you ever have sex without a condom?' and i will press the issue- even for more money.
if they say yes, they can kiss their barfine goodbye. a girl who looks after herself and is knowledgable will be a lot more risk free, imho, and there are plenty of girls out there.
i hope some of this has been useful.
pete
Is anyone here familiar with the Hep B vaccine? I know you need a series of shots over 6 months before you are completed immunized. I got my first Hep b shot about 30 days ago. I'm trying to figure out how much protection from Hep B do I have at this time.
I'm also trying to figure out how common Hep B is. I know at least one poster to this board mentioned that he picked up Hep B while he was in Bangkok but he recoverd just fine. I'm curious how many other people here have contracted Hep B or is everyone pretty much up on their shots? If you don't feel comfortable posting your responses to the board, please feel free to PM me. The input I get from this board will help me decide how I will conduct myself on my trip to BKK next week.
Thanks
[QUOTE=Member #3060]Is anyone here familiar with the Hep B vaccine? [/QUOTE][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hepatitis_B[/url]
Good link to check.
[QUOTE=Petemcc]
<cut>
I haven't been able to do much research lately, but frankly, a girl having an STD of the throat is quite unlikely. If she has, it should be obvious because her mouth will not exactly be nice- bit like someone with a sore throat.
Really, and I am not saying that BBBJ are risk free, but according to my latest textbook, they come pretty near the bottom for chances of getting something horrible. remember, saliva is actually quite nasty to most organisms, well mostly bacteria. Sure, many of us, or all of us at one time get a cold, but that is a virus, and the various viruses ( including the influenza virus) are very, very good at getting past defences. However, most bacteria are fucked off by the saliva and the commensal bacteria in the mouth. BUT, as I said before, there are still risks.
Frankly, sex with a condom is 100% risk free, if the condom is used properly, there is no prior sexual contact with genitilia, and the condom doesn't break, but in reality, that doesn't happen, so nothing is risk free. The only risk free sexual practice, apart from abstaining, is a totally monogomous relationship ( I wish they had spell check here!), but as mongers, that isn't an option. In other words, it is about risk minimisation.
<cut>
[/QUOTE]
Firstly Clamydia. This is very easy to catch.
I have now had it twice but no other STDs.
First time I believe I caught from a BBBJ as normal sex was protected by condom.
2nd time I caught it in the left eye (no where else), presumably by not washing hands thoroughly after pussy play.
So clearly Clamydia can be transferred from one thing to another if no great time delay.
Now condoms do in reality break occasionally, particularly from accidentable or deliberate finger nails. Also girls using internal sponges can cause breakage through friction (i have experienced this). Finally occasionally condoms break after prolonged sex for no apparent reason. Has happened to me maybe twice over many years. Good lubrication is important.
In addition condoms can slip off more often than they break, again usually with prolonged sex.
So don't go with girls that are willing not to use condoms.
The condom is great protection nearly all of the time (but accidents do happen).
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]2nd time I caught it in the left eye (no where else)[/QUOTE]You caught a Conjunctivitis, highly contagious! See below:
[b][i]Causes of Pinkeye[/b]
Pinkeye can be caused by many of the bacteria and viruses responsible for colds and other infections, — including ear infections, sinus infections, and sore throats — and by the same types of bacteria that cause the sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) chlamydia and gonorrhea.[/i]
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]Firstly Chlymadia. This is very easy to catch.
I have now had it twice but no other STDs.
First time I believe I caught from a BBBJ as normal sex was protected by condom.
2nd time I caught it in the left eye (no where else), presumably by not washing hands thoroughly after pussy play.
So clearly Clamydia can be transferred from one thing to another if no great time delay.
Now condoms do in reality break occasionally, particularly from accidentable or deliberate finger nails. Also girls using internal sponges can cause breakage through friction (i have experienced this). Finally occasionally condoms break after prolonged sex for no apparent reason. Has happened to me maybe twice over many years. Good lubrication is important.
In addition condoms can slip off more often than they break, again usually with prolonged sex.
So don't go with girls that are willing not to use condoms.
The condom is great protection nearly all of the time (but accidents do happen).[/QUOTE]
You have some good points there, and I notice that you agree with most of what I say.
As stated, nothing is 100% risk free, and you seem to have done pretty well over the years by all accounts. I wonder were you using condoms you brought with you, or local ones?
Yeah, conjunctivitis from chlymadia is actually fairly common. The eyes are fairly susceptable to this unfortunately. Whilst I also accept that chlymadia is the most common STD, it isn't very easy to catch. Well, yeah, if she's rampant with it there is a very strong possibility, but as I said, a good long [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] afterwards will help an awful lot. Probably the important thing is that even if you were to catch it, like you have, you cover up for sex, so not spreading it onto the next girl. Now isn't that easy, and socially responsible? You, by your actions of practising safe sex have probably stopped innumerable other girls/mongers getting a dose of this, rather than like some we know off who would be spreading it around like a cold!
Clearly this hobby has risks, and like you, many of us try to minimise those risks. It's like playing competitive sport I suppose, sooner or later you'll get an injury, only the ones we can get are slightly more embarassing! However, using the sports analogy, if more people practised safe sex, ie played by the rules, the transmission rate would decrease and so would the risk, however there are certain selfish individuals out there who want to raise the odds for all of us by playing by their own rules.
I suppose all we can do is our best for ourselves. If we play by the rules, we shouldn't get too badly hurt, maybe the odd injury, but the more this turns into a free for all, the more the chances of serious injury.
Thanks for your contribution.
Pete
[QUOTE=Petemcc]Whilst I also accept that chlymadia is the most common STD, it isn't very easy to catch. Well, yeah, if she's rampant with it there is a very strong possibility, but as I said, a good long [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] afterwards will help an awful lot.[/QUOTE]
Pete, assuming that we're discussing unprotected blowjobs, what's the timescale for this? How long does it take for the bug to get down one's urethera, on average, and assuming 'normal' suck and blow pressure? After how many minutes/seconds should I curtail the BBBJ? How much do variable mouth strengths and suck-to-blow techniques impact on this? How big does the [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] need to be to make me safe, and is there a cut-off point after we have established all the pre-infection variables?
[QUOTE=Petemcc]<cut>
Whilst I also accept that chlymadia is the most common STD, it isn't very easy to catch. <cut>
Pete[/QUOTE]
Well actually I was talking about Chlamydia Trachomatis.
It seems neither of us could spell it right.
I guess I am saying that if Chlamydia is the most common STD then it must be easier to catch than other STDs. Sounds logical?
So my "easy" is only relative to things like HIV, Hepatitus, Syphillis, etc.
A friend of mine caught Chlamydia by becoming exposed when taking the condom off after sex completion, he believes. He had no other unprotected activity. That, in my book, is relatively easy transmission.
On the other hand, Chlamydia is not so easy to catch that we actually catch it every single year. But frequent mongers will catch it sooner or later if they don't take reasonable care with hygene in relation to sexual activities.
Condoms substantially REDUCE the risk of catching Chlamydia.
Apparently an estimated 2.8 million people catch Chlamydia each year in the U.S.
I therefore understand the Zithromax self-dose mongers very easily, even though this activity is frowned upon, if used infrequently and not instead of condoms. Mongers need to be cured immediately to minimise passing on to others, especially girlfriends, wives etc. especially since could have Chlamydia for some time before being aware. Some people have no apparent symptoms it seems. A regular (at least annual) screen for STDs is advisable for Mongers.
Tick Tock, Tick Tock as Terry says.
[QUOTE=Gladiator]If you have had a BBBJ you have already exposed your dick to whatever bacteria/virus were in her mouth/saliva, so cleaning your dick before putting the condom will have a minimum effect.
That would be like having a copious meal, with several full fat dishes, and after that taking a white coffee with semi-skimmed milk because you want to look after your weight.[/QUOTE]
Well, I was thinking this: If you slip the rubber on with all the saliva and stuff on your dick, then all the stuff gets trapped in the rubber, which is a moist and wrm environment. The chances of getting infected then, I would think is higher than just having a bbbj? I am no medicl expert, but just a thought.
Any other opnion on this?
Diver
Driver, Mick, Terry. Sorry about my spelling. It's a fact of my life that I have become brain dead and numb over the years, and I find that I can't even spell everyday words. Mostly this is because I am severely under the influence of alcohol when I type here, so that's my excuse.
You all make good points and raise many good questions.
As I have said before, I am not an expert, but I have a background in biological sciences, have kept an interest in it, and am studying to be a nurse. I also understand medical research papers, which is a help.
Unfortunately, STDs/STIs, whatever, aren't really that well 'studied'. By that I mean lt's not like there are volunteers queuing up to get a dose for medical science. Also, because of the whole sordidness of the subject, many people are unwilling to tell the whole truth to health professionals. Unlike alcoholism, diabetes, heart disease, etc, people are willing to discuss their lifestyles etc and thus much more is known about shall we say other diseases. Most of the stuff from STDs comes from anecdotal evidence, stats, and some studies which perhaps are not as objective as they should be.'
Now, getting back to it. We have to remember that most of these infections, be they bacterial, viral, fungal, or protozoal, are not like big pools of infection, like airborn Anthrax spores, or Ebola or something. It's not like on TV where you can walk into a room with someone who has infectious chlamydia and suddenly get it- yeah, I know this is taking it a bit far, but we have to remember that these infections aren't really that 'virulent', for want of a better word.
Most probably, if you have bareback sex with someone who has an STD, you have a pretty good chance of getting it yourself, and in fact the woman is much more at risk than the man. The very nature of the mucus membranes of the vagina and anus, and the 'comparative' lack of dilution of their secretions makes them more likely harbengours of infection ( again, the spelling!).
Now to respond more directly:
Terry: Assuming you aren't 'taking the [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url]', I don't know. Like I said, there are few volunteers who will put themselves forward to get sucked off by a girl/man/whatever with Chlamydia to determine how long the average infection time is, and what technique works best etc. I am sure that one day I could set up a mongers' institute for STD investigation where volunteers could have their way with infectious girls and the results studied. Maybe a thought?
As for suck and blow pressure, well apart from the difficulty in measuring that, and recording it- I mean do we use Pa or mm Hg?, the problem is if the giver is blowing air, or saliva, or both?
[url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] times, well again that is dependant on your bladder. If you're well pissed and haven't had a [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] for an hour, the chances are that apart from not enjoying the BBBJ and cutting it short, that you will [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] so much that the girl will go to sleep. But being serious, it's like anything, a certain number of bacteria are required to produce a full infection, diluting them down, ASAP has to reduce their numbers, but studies, again are limited. My advice is to do what you can. Let's face it, a BBBJ is a lot less hazerdous than BB intercourse, so it's going to happen, so minimise the risks. In microbiology there's no such thing as 100% kill- it uses a reverse exponential curve where the graph never reaches zero, but you can certainally reduce the risk a lot. For you personally, I'd advise you dip your wick in bleach and using your PC muscles, attempt to suck up some bleach, or get the girl to get a drinking straw, get some bleach in her mouth and blow it down your jap's eye. It may not give you a 100% kill rate, but sure as fuck, you'll not be using your dick for a while!
Mick. There are certain reasons why Chlamydia is the most common STD, and mostly that's because it is usually asymptomatic. Although the other major ones like Syph and Gon can be asympomatic, especialy in males, generally they end up showing obvious symptoms and people seek treatment. BTW, anecdotal evidence, and the word of the STD doc I saw ( I didn't have one, I just fucked someone who did) is that Hep C cannot be contracted during sex- and cannot is used in the anything is possible category. Similarly, Hep B is a faecal-oral route transmission primarily,but blood bourn, so yeah, certain practices could lead to that.
Anyway, Chlamydia, though it can have severe consequences is rather hard to self diagnose, especially in women, hence it seems more prevelant.
Again, with your friend, what people really do and what they say are different. I told my missus 99% of what I did in Pattaya, but left out the bits that would cause her apperplexy- such is human nature.
Self medication however is so, so dangerous. Why are there so many antibiotics on the market, and new synthetic ones? Why do we have MRSA?
Because people have fucked-up badly. As I said before, in microbiology there is never a 100% kill rate, one of the reasons being a rogue -let's say bacterium here- that doesn't get killed by the medication because it finds ways around the toxic effects. Correct doses are designed to make sure that there is an overwhelming amount of medication to almost ensure that whatever counter measure it has will be overcome by the shear amount of firepower delivered. Self medication, as you can see has its problems as there is no medical input. Why most people, let's say with mental illnesses fail in their medication regieme is because they think they no longer need it. Same as this. The running and stinging has stopped, so it's right! The bottle says this so I did this. Formulations and regiemes change all the time, and although Zithromax is a wonderful AB, soon, it will not be because of abuse, and bacterial resistance. Remember this, sooner or later the little bastards will find a resistance- remember, no 100% kill, and most of them have been around for a lot longer than us.
Condoms, in theory, have 100% resistance. They test these by trying to pass an electric current through them. I assure you, if an electron can't get through, nothing larger will, unless it has some microbial c4!
Driver. You have a good point, and a good deal of common sense. If her infected saliva is caught in the environment of a closed condom, some of it will make its way down your japs eye, so yeah, have a wash. Before someone is cathaterised, they are swabbed with alcohol!
Finally guys, look at Aus and regulated Singapore. Condoms are required for everything. Australia has a fantastic record with its licensed sex workers for diseases. They shower you, check your knob, make you use mouthwash, and generally make sure that they take all precautions they can. Yeah, it can be clinical, but so is playing any game. The fun starts when you get into it. If she knows she's safe, and you know you're safe, then you can have fun. If one of you has any reservations, then it's less fun.
BUT, ours is a risky sport, so take the precautions you deem necessary and take care of yourself and others!
Pete
[QUOTE=Petemcc]Mick. There are certain reasons why Chlamydia is the most common STD, and mostly that's because it is usually asymptomatic.
Pete[/QUOTE]
"usually asymptomatic" is stretching it a bit. Perhaps "sometimes" would be fairer , however its true that symptoms may not appear or be noticed for weeks.
Doctors assumed me that 2 pills was enough to cure Chlamydia because it would stay in my system for up to 2 weeks while the Chlamydia was likely to be wiped out iwithin the 2 week period. Symptoms had dissappeared after one week. I wish I had self medicated on the basis of it just might help (but not knowing what was wrong with my eye), since the doctors did not give the pills it to me for 4 weeks afetr the symptoms started in my eye. Even then it was still waiting a test to confirm Chlamydia, but medication was allowed based on the assumption that it was likely.
Presumably someone who has self medicated a few days before mongering will not see the symptoms because the bacteria will be killed off before having a chance to multiply.
They will then be less likely to give it to someone else during the normal non-symtomatic stage.
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]"usually asymptomatic" is stretching it a bit. Perhaps "sometimes" would be fairer , however its true that symptoms may not appear or be noticed for weeks.
Doctors assumed me that 2 pills was enough to cure Chlamydia because it would stay in my system for up to 2 weeks while the Chlamydia was likely to be wiped out iwithin the 2 week period. Symptoms had dissappeared after one week. I wish I had self medicated on the basis of it just might help (but not knowing what was wrong with my eye), since the doctors did not give the pills it to me for 4 weeks afetr the symptoms started in my eye. Even then it was still waiting a test to confirm Chlamydia, but medication was allowed based on the assumption that it was likely.
Presumably someone who has self medicated a few days before mongering will not see the symptoms because the bacteria will be killed off before having a chance to multiply.
They will then be less likely to give it to someone else during the normal non-symtomatic stage.[/QUOTE]
From what I have read, it actually is more commonly asymptomatic in men than not, but hey, why argue about a drippy dick?
The reasoning behind your self medicating regime prior to mongering would appear on the face of it to make sense, however it isn't quite that simple, unfortunately. As I said theer is never a definite 100% kill rate in microbiology, but there is usually a bloody good chance of it. I don't honestly know the pharmacokinetics of the drug, so can't comment on its use with newly established, or sub-clinical infections, so I can't say either way if what you are proposing would work. I just know that life isn't that simple.
More importantly, there's a growing trend now for QUM, Quality Use of Medicines, in a bid, amongst other things, to reduce the number of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Bacteria's ability to become resistant was somewhat accelerated by man when antibiotics became available and prescribed for conditions where they were not necessary, and where the wrong one was prescribed/used. Each time we use an antibiotic, it gives bacteria the chance to become resistant, and I don't mean the baddies that give you a drippy dick, I mean the billions of commensal bacteria in our bodies. Bacteria unfortunately have sex, as it were, and exchange DNA/RNA and thus normal bacteria that line your urethra may become Zithromax resistant from constant exposure, and pass the resistance onto teh introduced strain of drippy dick.
At the moment, Zithromax is the drug of choice, in the west at least, for STDs as a starter, because it's a relatively new drug, and its site of action is pretty specific. However I can see the time when it is no longer effective, and don't quote me on this, but I seem to remember being told once that SE Asia is the main problem for AB resistant STDs.
Anyway Mick, everyone will do what they want, no matter what I say, no matter what anyone says, but I for one do not want to come back froma mongering trip, which my good lady wife has let me go on, only to tell her that I have or may have an STD, so I will stick to condoms!
BTW, Ansell in Aus have new condoms out that are so thin that you can take a fingerprint of a finger inserted into one. Now that's thin. I'll try to test drive them sometime and let everyone know what they're like.
All the best
Pete
need some help?
first i know its wrong to self medicate and i won’t do it if i don’t have to (hopefully never) but.
i will travel to china in the end of mars and sty there fore 2-3 month, but first a stop, 1 week in los for some fun :)
and my worst fear is ending up in inner china [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord134][CodeWord134][/url] razor blade, drippy dick or something like that.
have any one been to a hospital in inner china. well then you know what i am talking about.
if the worst scenario will happen, i have to take a translator with me and that can create some problem later.
in the last 3-4 trips to asia i had 3 condom splits 2 times super tight chinese pussis have managed to squeeze of the condom, i never refuse a bbbj, but so fare i have been lucky, never had a std.
but i’m no superman and i know that bad things can happen, even to me and it doesn’t matter how safe you try to play this game.
i would like to know what type of antibiotic that works for different std.
if someone with knowledge would pm me some suggestion for what to bye and where in bkk i can find it, i will be grateful.
Why do you not go to the safer side and postpone your visit to LOL and go there after your business in inner China?
F.V.
If DATY, stick a strepsil in your mouth!
10/10 points for this post..
I agree with you that from what I've also read/studied, clamydia does seem to be much more asymptomatic (in males) that other STDs. I marval at anyone on here who can detect he has clamydia himself lol.
Can't agree more on the topic of self-medicating. This is just plain stupid, even apart from the obvious dangers to one's health (not being trained in health care to start popping pills), there's many other factors- antibiotics are not vitamin pills, they literally bomb your entire system ridding it completely of both helpful and non-helpful bacterias. Regular users have also reported lowered immune systems, loose bowels and all sorts of side-effects. Third, exactly as you say, the antibiotics are then flushed into the environment (p1ssed down toilets, into sinks wherever), and within a few years become less and less potent. This has happened so many times, with wide spectrum antibiotics, and creams such as Canasten etc., which are all ineffective now.
[QUOTE=Petemcc]From what I have read, it actually is more commonly asymptomatic in men than not, but hey, why argue about a drippy dick?
The reasoning behind your self medicating regime prior to mongering would appear on the face of it to make sense, however it isn't quite that simple, unfortunately. As I said theer is never a definite 100% kill rate in microbiology, but there is usually a bloody good chance of it. I don't honestly know the pharmacokinetics of the drug, so can't comment on its use with newly established, or sub-clinical infections, so I can't say either way if what you are proposing would work. I just know that life isn't that simple.
More importantly, there's a growing trend now for QUM, Quality Use of Medicines, in a bid, amongst other things, to reduce the number of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Bacteria's ability to become resistant was somewhat accelerated by man when antibiotics became available and prescribed for conditions where they were not necessary, and where the wrong one was prescribed/used. Each time we use an antibiotic, it gives bacteria the chance to become resistant, and I don't mean the baddies that give you a drippy dick, I mean the billions of commensal bacteria in our bodies. Bacteria unfortunately have sex, as it were, and exchange DNA/RNA and thus normal bacteria that line your urethra may become Zithromax resistant from constant exposure, and pass the resistance onto teh introduced strain of drippy dick.
At the moment, Zithromax is the drug of choice, in the west at least, for STDs as a starter, because it's a relatively new drug, and its site of action is pretty specific. However I can see the time when it is no longer effective, and don't quote me on this, but I seem to remember being told once that SE Asia is the main problem for AB resistant STDs.
Anyway Mick, everyone will do what they want, no matter what I say, no matter what anyone says, but I for one do not want to come back froma mongering trip, which my good lady wife has let me go on, only to tell her that I have or may have an STD, so I will stick to condoms!
BTW, Ansell in Aus have new condoms out that are so thin that you can take a fingerprint of a finger inserted into one. Now that's thin. I'll try to test drive them sometime and let everyone know what they're like.
All the best
Pete[/QUOTE]
What do you fellows suggest, that we simply not treat the ailment? We might as well use the antibiotics while they are effective.
As for the supposition that a 'layman' cannot adequately inform himself of the various characteristics of something as simple as an antibiotic, and should feel compelled to seek the advice of the shamen, well, pshaw.
[QUOTE=Opebo]What do you fellows suggest, that we simply not treat the ailment? We might as well use the antibiotics while they are effective.
As for the supposition that a 'layman' cannot adequately inform himself of the various characteristics of something as simple as an antibiotic, and should feel compelled to seek the advice of the shamen, well, pshaw.[/QUOTE]
Opebo. This is not the fight club, so I'll be polite. I have no idea what country you come from( though I can guess), nor indeed which planet sometimes, but most civilised countries have legislation concerning drugs. Usually they folow a 'schedule'. Certain drugs are deemed safe enough for any moron to use without much advice or supervision, some require a pharmacist only to supply them, and some require a doctor. For the lower down the scale drugs like antibiotics, doctors prescribe because there are inherant risks of non-compliance with the required regieme, and of adverse effects/inactivation of the drug by other drugs or remedies. Doctors get pretty frequent updates on how drugs are going in the general population, and they do after all spend the best part of 5 years studying the body not just in detail, but understanding the interaction of various body systems, shall we say a holistic view.
As I have stated before, there are reasons why many organisms are resistant to for example antibiotics. That is because of impropper use by professionals and amateurs alike, and these days there is a push for a more considered approach right drug, right dose, right method of delivery, etc.
Whatever you may read on the internet is probably out of date or the opinion of one group of people, or one person, with a vested interest, or a big ego.
Without doing microbial plates, or a DNA test, you cannot be sure just what infection you have. Please accept that. That's what growing cultures, Gram staining, DNA testing, antibody reactions and more is all about.
Many strains of syphillis, and quite a few of gonnorhoea have acquired antibiotic resistance, and- well I didn't want to go into all this shit but...
Ok, there are what is called sub-clinical infections. You may have a pathogen actively living in you, but it is kept in control just about enough by your natural flora ( which hopefully you haven't killed off) and your immune system, oh, and by your mucosa. There is at least 3 ways as far as I can remember how bacteria can exchange genetic information, and a self dosage of AB can kill maybe 99.9% of bacteria, but maybe that .1% that has mutated when multiplying, or has exchanged genetic information with your normal flora which have become resistant to that AB, lives. Its 'progeny' may not have the complete ability to overcome your body's systems and give you the full-blown symptoms, but they could still be lurking, with you probably being infectious, and being in for a rude shock when yo get your next dose, because sure as fuck, they'll pass their information on.
When you go to a doctor/pox clinic, they take samples and the microbiologists will decide what strain of what pathogen you have. Sure, the doc will give you a large dose, fairly broad spectrum AB, but you will be advised that you could be infectious until they know exactly what you have, treat it accordingly, and get re-tested. Simple, eh?
Tell you what. If you're so good at self medicating, hows about if you suffer from a bit of cardiac failure, grab yorself some Foxglove leaves ( look for Digoxin and Digitalis when you do your search) and see how well you self medicate on them!
I could go on and on, but I was accused on another thread of giving a lesson, so I'll stop here.
Finally, and don't get me wrong, I know and understand the arrogance of the medical profession, but it's like this. Electricians do the wiring, plumbers do the pipes, mechanics do the car, accountants do the taxes, doctors sort the diseases.
Live long and prosper.
Pete
[QUOTE=Meal Soy Hooing]Looking at 161 girls and saw this.....
$400(全套Combo)
$500(全套Combo+舒服保健)
What does it mean?
Thanks!!![/QUOTE]全套 = full service
Combo = the assorted knick knacks that come with full service
舒服保健 = some kind of comfortable health promoting service
Petemcc, it's well meaning, I'm sure, but really not worth the bandwidth. I suggest that we just let Darwin sort it out with Opebo.
[QUOTE=Member #2041]Petemcc, it's well meaning, I'm sure, but really not worth the bandwidth. I suggest that we just let Darwin sort it out with Opebo.[/QUOTE]
Point taken, I just despise arrogant ignorant cunts.
Dear Policeman Pete,
Thank you for the extensive post. I would only like to comment on your inclusion of 'microbiologist' in the team that would, hypothetically (in an ideal world), be attending my urethra.
I can assure you that in Thailand what passes for a medical professional is one busy, money hungry chap, who would normally not even examine the weeping weenie, but simply prescribe some more or less standard course of antibiotics for both gonhorrea and clamydia.
to a guy who has drug resistant gonhorrea and is leaking like a seive but insists in having BB sex with working girls and he wont have it any other way?
Seems strange to me.
[QUOTE=HarryR]to a guy who has drug resistant gonhorrea and is leaking like a seive but insists in having BB sex with working girls and he wont have it any other way?
Seems strange to me.[/QUOTE]
Dear HarryR - firstly, thanks for your wonderful photographs in the New Zealand forum. But I do hope that you are not implying that I am the unfortunate described in your post above. While I seem to pick up the clap anywhere from once a year to once a month, it always responds immediately to treatment.
Last time to add variety I used amoxicillin with clavulanic acid (five 625 mg tablets) rather than azithromycin or the shot. It worked fine but gave me a stomach ache for a good 3 hours. I still recommend the shot, or if it is inconvenient to go to the clinic, Zithromax.
[QUOTE=HarryR]to a guy who has drug resistant gonhorrea and is leaking like a seive but insists in having BB sex with working girls and he wont have it any other way?
Seems strange to me.[/QUOTE]
Non Specific Drip. Common in Vietnam when soldiers would get it over and over and 'cillan's and sulfides no longer worked. There was stuff you'd catch that they didn't have a name for. Now the FDA approved the use of the "last defense" antibiotic in cattle. google it
"FDA poised to approve cattle antibiotic despite warnings
Health & Fitness – The government is on track to approve a new antibiotic to treat a pneumonia-like disease in cattle, despite warnings from health groups and a majority of the agency's own expert advisers that the decision will be dangerous - for people."
Dangerous because that antiboitic they are talking about was reserved for when nothing else worked. All it will do is create super microbes as it is passed down the food chain.
This was the same agency that tried and tried to promote Thalidamide, the morning sickness pill that caused the 6" arms birth defect. It was ONE lone lady at the FDA that resisted is so much that it was never sold here.
At the end of WWII there was no latex for rubber making, and no condums.. You could get sweet Italian girls for a bag of groceries from the commisary, or a teenage Jap girl for a candybar. There are still a few old-timers in the PI that can tell you what a cake walk it was being in the occupataional forces after WWII. The girls often had clap or syph. The famous Italian bike racer Coppi died of syph he picked way back then. With no Penicillan or injectible sulfides you drove around and looked for a blue light and that was where you got your proplylactic kit if you were a GI. It was a syringe w/no needle. and you poured a sulfide solution in it the syringe and squirted it in the one eye of your trouser schnauser until you felt the solution up up in your bladder. My uncle told me the first time it was the most unpleasant feeling, but you suddenly knew you weren't going to get the clap so that horrible feeling was a sort of relief.
In WWI they'd paint your dick with Iodine when you came out of the French Brothels. The STD was well up in the urethra and this did little or no good. Syph was like an HIV back then where the "cure" was rubbing mercury in the palm of your hand. It prolonged you life, but you'd get poisened by the mercury. The old saying was "One night with Venus gets you a lifetime with Mercury".
[QUOTE=Henderson]If DATY, stick a strepsil in your mouth![/QUOTE]This will not prevent you form getting std.
But sure helpful if you do not like the smell of girl private part.
[quote=tors ham]need some help?
first i know its wrong to self medicate and i won’t do it if i don’t have to (hopefully never) but.
i will travel to china in the end of mars and sty there fore 2-3 month, but first a stop, 1 week in los for some fun :)
and my worst fear is ending up in inner china [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord134][CodeWord134][/url] razor blade, drippy dick or something like that.
have any one been to a hospital in inner china. well then you know what i am talking about.
if the worst scenario will happen, i have to take a translator with me and that can create some problem later.
in the last 3-4 trips to asia i had 3 condom splits 2 times super tight chinese pussis have managed to squeeze of the condom, i never refuse a bbbj, but so fare i have been lucky, never had a std.
but i’m no superman and i know that bad things can happen, even to me and it doesn’t matter how safe you try to play this game.
i would like to know what type of antibiotic that works for different std.
if someone with knowledge would pm me some suggestion for what to bye and where in bkk i can find it, i will be grateful.[/quote]
tors ham,
you worry too much. you haven't caught anything yet because you are taking precautions.
further precautions:
1. make sure girls has no rough sponge inside her pussy. this can abrade and break the condom.
2. throughly wash hands after fingers go in her pussy before putting fingers near your mouth or eyes (i caught clamydia in the eye).
3. don't go with girls willing to do bareback sex (bbbj is far less risky but not 100% safe).
4. keep some zithromax as backup in case something goes wrong, but see a doctor anyway for proper testing if anything goes wrong.
5. lube is needed with condoms. if not, tight pussy can easily pull off condom as you mentioned.
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]Tors Ham,
You worry too much. You haven't caught anything yet because you are taking precautions.
Further precautions:
1. Make sure girls has no rough sponge inside her pussy. This can abrade and break the condom.
2. Throughly wash hands after fingers go in her pussy before putting fingers near your mouth or eyes (I caught Clamydia in the eye).
3. Don't go with girls willing to do bareback sex (BBBJ is far less risky but not 100% safe).
4. Keep some Zithromax as backup in case something goes wrong, but see a doctor anyway for proper testing if anything goes wrong.
5. Lube is needed with condoms. If not, tight pussy can easily pull off condom as you mentioned.[/QUOTE]
And bring listerine to rinse before and after bbbjcim, it really works :)
[QUOTE=River]This will not prevent you form getting std.
But sure helpful if you do not like the smell of girl private part.
[QUOTE=Henderson]If DATY, stick a strepsil in your mouth![/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]I wasn't suggesting that Strepsils could prevent STDs but they do seem to help prevent sore throats that may be caused by bacteria in pussies when DATY.
I’ve never had a sore throat from DATY in the UK but kept getting one with a very clean regular girl in the PI. I remembered someone on another forum recommending Strepsils for this exact problem and when I did it with a Strepsil in my mouth, no sore throat.
[QUOTE=Henderson]I wasn't suggesting that Strepsils could prevent STDs but they do seem to help prevent sore throats that may be caused by bacteria in pussies when DATY.
I’ve never had a sore throat from DATY in the UK but kept getting one with a very clean regular girl in the PI. I remembered someone on another forum recommending Strepsils for this exact problem and when I did it with a Strepsil in my mouth, no sore throat.[/QUOTE]Sure you might be right that strepsils may able to reduce the chance of soretrhoat as it contains some antiseptics.
But then resistant strains bacteria can develop and even antibiotics are not effective. Some of these are the cause of sorethroat after DATY.
I think precations are required, such as make sure no sore/ ulcer/ cut /bleeding/ infection in the mouth and girl's private part b4 and during DATY. See that the girl's private part is clean and no foul smelling discharge.
Practise safe sex.
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]Tors Ham,
You worry too much. You haven't caught anything yet because you are taking precautions.
Further precautions:
1. Make sure girls has no rough sponge inside her pussy. This can abrade and break the condom.
2. Throughly wash hands after fingers go in her pussy before putting fingers near your mouth or eyes (I caught Clamydia in the eye).
3. Don't go with girls willing to do bareback sex (BBBJ is far less risky but not 100% safe).
4. Keep some Zithromax as backup in case something goes wrong, but see a doctor anyway for proper testing if anything goes wrong.
5. Lube is needed with condoms. If not, tight pussy can easily pull off condom as you mentioned.[/QUOTE]Mick Licker,
Do you know have good is a condom in preventing STD/AIDs when used properly? Almost 100% ?
[QUOTE=River]Mick Licker,
Do you know have good is a condom in preventing STD/AIDs when used properly? Almost 100% ?[/QUOTE]
Yes, of course I know that. Not sure why you would ask such a basic question???
However even the greatest condoms are not abrasion proof and slip off proof. So the safety of a good condom is unfortuantely only 99.9% or so.
Hence I mentioned other precautions.
The best condom in the world did not prevent me from catching Clamydia in my left eye from finger transference.
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]The best condom in the world did not prevent me from catching Clamydia in my left eye from finger transference.[/QUOTE]Hahahahahahaha... I caught the same a few months back. It's the pink-eye, highly contagious, caused sometimes by Ghonorrea and Chlamydia:
[url]http://www.ecureme.com/emyhealth/Pediatrics/Pink_Eye.asp[/url]
[QUOTE=River]Do you know have good is a condom in preventing STD/AIDs when used properly? Almost 100% ?[/QUOTE]I am not a doctor, but, when used properly I think nearly all condoms are safe. But this is hardly a question to ask in a porn forum (unless you're ready to get a non reliable answer).
If you really want to know more about STD's or protection, there are plenty of Furums that cover that, and some have Real doctors ;)
Good luck
Sure, condoms are safe.. but how many times have you had them break, or slip off?? I've had more than 5-10 breakages over the years, and only recently while being humped by a quite dirty bar-rat, the rubber slipped off.. so it's a bit of luck as well.
Play safe, but know that nothing is 100% safe.
[QUOTE=NicFrenchy]I am not a doctor, but, when used properly I think nearly all condoms are safe. But this is hardly a question to ask in a porn forum (unless you're ready to get a non reliable answer).
If you really want to know more about STD's or protection, there are plenty of Furums that cover that, and some have Real doctors ;)
Good luck[/QUOTE]
Drinking green tea could help in the fight against HIV, research suggests.
Scientists found a component called epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) prevents HIV from binding to immune system cells by getting there first.
Once EGCG has bound to immune system cells there is no room for HIV to take hold in its usual fashion.
However, experts said the joint UK and US work, which appears in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, was at a very preliminary stage.
We suggest that it should be used in combination with conventional medicines to improve quality of life for those infected
Professor Mike Williamson
University of Sheffield
Researcher Professor Mike Williamson, of the University of Sheffield, said: "Our research shows that drinking green tea could reduce the risk of becoming infected by HIV, and could also slow down the spread of HIV.
"It is not a cure, and nor is it a safe way to avoid infection, however, we suggest that it should be used in combination with conventional medicines to improve quality of life for those infected.
"Future research is also currently under way in order to determine how much effect can be expected from different amounts of tea."
More work needed
Keith Alcorn, senior editor of the Aidsmap web service, said tests on animals would be needed before any conclusions could be safely drawn on the potential protective effect of drinking green tea.
"This study only looks at the ability of a chemical in green tea to block HIV binding to human CD4 immune cells in the test tube.
"Many substances shown to prevent HIV infection in the test tube turn out to have little or no effect in real life, so I think there's a long way to go before anyone should rely on green tea to protect against HIV infection."
Lisa Power, head of policy at the HIV charity, Terrence Higgins Trust said: "Condoms keep HIV at bay. Anything that boosts your immune system is beneficial for people with HIV, but green tea can't be a substitute for proper medication and prevention techniques."
Green tea has been linked to a positive effect on a wide range of conditions, including heart disease, cancer and Alzheimer's.
Story from BBC NEWS:
[url]http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/health/6502399.stm[/url]
Published: 2007/03/29 00:36:16 GMT
I have a safe sex related question which involves the use of Thai language:
I have a regular down at the upcountry brothel I see maybe once a week, who alas now has the clap (either gonorrhea or clamydia or both), I believe due to previous visits I made to her just after returning from Pattaya, land of clap. Now I have cured myself of those ailments, but have found that I have been reinfected by this woman on subequent visits. She is of course like most women apparently asymptomatic.
Therefore, I need to approach her with a nice new unopened box of Zithromax, and persuade her to take it, but alas she speaks not a word of English. Can someone relate in simple Thai this basic story:
"Last time I saw you I got a little drip, and went to the doctor. He gave me this (Zithromax), and when I took it I was all better. So, can you please take this {pointing to Zithromax} so we can keep seeing each other?"
I realize the best method of persuasion is a nice tip, but I want to be able to communicate to assuage any fears she may have that I'm a mad poisoner - we farangs are known for being psychos.
[QUOTE=Opebo]
Therefore, I need to approach her with a nice new unopened box of Zithromax, and persuade her to take it, but alas she speaks not a word of English. [/QUOTE]
If you care about this girl, Opebo, just take her to a Dr. and let him explain the situation to her in Thai. If the Dr. prescribes Zithromax, you'll already have it to give to her.
Good luck,
Daddy
[QUOTE=Daddy07]If you care about this girl, Opebo, just take her to a Dr. and let him explain the situation to her in Thai. If the Dr. prescribes Zithromax, you'll already have it to give to her.
Good luck,
Daddy[/QUOTE]
Thank you, Father, for your kind advice, but unfortunately in Thailand being seen about during the day with a prostitute is a faux pas, particularly for any purpose other than the obvious one.
Have to agree with Daddy's advice on this one.. unless you're an MD or GP, why even bother trying to guess what she has (since you admitted she probably has multiple infections) and then try to get her to take meds? Also the responsibility you're taking on.. You have 3 options: 1) Take her to a doctor personally, 2) Ensure she goes herself to the Dr. 3) Dump her and say bye.
I'm not a dentist, so I dont try fixing people's teeth myself..
[QUOTE=Opebo]Thank you, Father, for your kind advice, but unfortunately in Thailand being seen about during the day with a prostitute is a faux pas, particularly for any purpose other than the obvious one.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Freeman 418]Have to agree with Daddy's advice on this one.. unless you're an MD or GP, why even bother trying to guess what she has (since you admitted she probably has multiple infections) and then try to get her to take meds? Also the responsibility you're taking on.. You have 3 options: 1) Take her to a doctor personally, 2) Ensure she goes herself to the Dr. 3) Dump her and say bye.
I'm not a dentist, so I dont try fixing people's teeth myself..[/QUOTE]
1 g Zithromax is one of the top one or two recommended treatments, Freeman, for both clamydia and gonhorrea. There is absolutely no point going to a doctor, and since that errand is impossible anyway, I would ask that you confine yourself to the question I asked - how to communicate with her.
Please, people, your obsession with the medical profession is not helpful. True, in lands where they, through political influence, have gained a monopoly on the dispensing of simple drugs - such as Zithromax - we have no choice but to pay them their tithe. But happily such is not the case in Thailand.
So I reiterate, how may I say, roughly, in simple Thai:
"Last time I saw you I got a little drip, and went to the doctor. He gave me this {holding up nice unopened box of Zithromax}, and when I took it I was all better. So, can you please take this {pointing to Zithromax} so we can keep seeing each other?"
[QUOTE=Opebo]1 g Zithromax is one of the top one or two recommended treatments, Freeman, for both clamydia and gonhorrea. There is absolutely no point going to a doctor, and since that errand is impossible anyway, I would ask that you confine yourself to the question I asked - how to communicate with her.
Please, people, your obsession with the medical profession is not helpful. True, in lands where they, through political influence, have gained a monopoly on the dispensing of simple drugs - such as Zithromax - we have no choice but to pay them their tithe. But happily such is not the case in Thailand.
So I reiterate, how may I say, roughly, in simple Thai:
"Last time I saw you I got a little drip, and went to the doctor. He gave me this {holding up nice unopened box of Zithromax}, and when I took it I was all better. So, can you please take this {pointing to Zithromax} so we can keep seeing each other?"[/QUOTE]
Opebo
I try very hard not to get wound up by your posts, but for the record you are a stupid ****. There's fuck all point explaining any aspect of science to you because you'll just come back with some stupid shite based upon anecdotes. My only worry is that other people may take what you say as being partly correct, and I address this reply mostly to them.
Look at the history of antibiotics since the late 40s, look at MRSA, do some reasearch and then be as blazee as Opebo, the man who knows everything about sexually transmitted diseases and their treatments.
[QUOTE=Opebo]1 g Zithromax is one of the top one or two recommended treatments, for both clamydia and gonhorrea. [/QUOTE]You may also have syphilis - you're increasingly displaying what may be one of the tertiary symptoms. And let's face it, you're a prime candidate.
If you have syphilis (and it's not advanced) you would need at least a 2g single dose of Zithromax, not 1g. Maybe it's time for a blood test - it's the only way to rule out syphilis (and a few other STDs) conclusively.
[QUOTE=Petemcc]
...be as blazee as Opebo, the man who knows everything about sexually transmitted diseases and their treatments.[/QUOTE]
...because he got them all :(
Zithromax is a very powerful antibiotic and is one that is recommended and prescribed by Doctors for the clap. However, it does not come cheaply. An equally efficient alternative is NORFLOXACIN 400mg (1 tablet about 4bt), which does the job just as well, and is also prescribed by Doctors. The dose is 2 x 400mg tablets, 1 time, before food, washed down with a glass of water.
Knowing that one has the clap, and also knowing that a doctor in Thailand (especially in Pattaya or Bangkok) will likely charge a minimum of 800bt for providing 2 Norfloxacin tablets, is it not infinitely more sensible to pop down to the pharmacy and make your own purchase?
So far as wanting the local brothel **** to take tablets to cure the disease Opebo believes she has, I would not do this. It's Ok to diagnose ones own diseases, but not Ok to diagnose and treat anyone elses!
Firstly, if you put it in use a condom! There are also someting called a finger cot which is like a finger rubber if you are goin to digitize any part of their body. After messing with a BG wash your hands and what ever came in contact condom or no condom. The bloke with Gono/Pink Eye got a bad thingo. It is as bad in the eye as on the wand!
As to the gent who goes to Up county lady houses. Dude, you are just plain nuts. I would guess that alot of shite we are exposed to come from the boyfriend of the girl we are with and he got it from a 200 Baht thai hooker!
I'm careful, never put my mouth south of the boarders and always use a condom. I she wants a lgood butt fingering. Put on condom over you fingers for that one also. I've done more that 100 girls and probaly gone a well over 400 times and have nothing. Never, not even a case of crabs. Careful I am.
And, I'm not sure was up with some of this talk about cures. If I had someting I would change Doc's untill I got a nice big shot in the butt! Massive amount of drugs in the butt muscle and off I go. I've know so many guys that have gotton a dirty jump and they always get the big shot in the rear and can go back into action in 2 or 3 days. Shite, there is a MD from L. A. Who is a big time punter that carries a points and a bottle of pennicillen (sp) and has shot himself.
[QUOTE=Bumholes1]Zithromax is a very powerful antibiotic and is one that is recommended and prescribed by Doctors for the clap. However, it does not come cheaply. An equally efficient alternative is NORFLOXACIN 400mg (1 tablet about 4bt), which does the job just as well, and is also prescribed by Doctors. The dose is 2 x 400mg tablets, 1 time, before food, washed down with a glass of water.
Knowing that one has the clap, and also knowing that a doctor in Thailand (especially in Pattaya or Bangkok) will likely charge a minimum of 800bt for providing 2 Norfloxacin tablets, is it not infinitely more sensible to pop down to the pharmacy and make your own purchase?
So far as wanting the local brothel **** to take tablets to cure the disease Opebo believes she has, I would not do this. It's Ok to diagnose ones own diseases, but not Ok to diagnose and treat anyone elses![/QUOTE]
I'm not sure that expense is a big issue when it comes to important issues like the clap but there are cheaper brands of Azithromycin as well, e.g Binozyt. Price is very low in comparison to mongering cost.
But I can't comment on best treatments as am not a doctor.
Thank you Bumholes for your common sense and useful information. Alas I am allergic to the Cipro-Norfloxacin family.
[QUOTE=Soi Song]Firstly, if you put it in use a condom![/quote]
No. To stay at home abstaining and masturbating would be more fun than that, SS.
[quote]As to the gent who goes to Up county lady houses. Dude, you are just plain nuts. I would guess that alot of shite we are exposed to come from the boyfriend of the girl we are with and he got it from a 200 Baht thai hooker![/quote]
Actually, the girls who cater to farang are far more apt to go bareback than these in the Thai-oriented industry. A majority of farang visitors prefer bareback sex, while most Thais use condoms.
[quote]And, I'm not sure was up with some of this talk about cures. If I had someting I would change Doc's untill I got a nice big shot in the butt! Massive amount of drugs in the butt muscle and off I go. I've know so many guys that have gotton a dirty jump and they always get the big shot in the rear and can go back into action in 2 or 3 days.[/QUOTE]
Yes, we all know about cefixime, it is just very inconvenient to go to the doctor everytime for this shot. Much easier to take antibiotics orally, and they work just as well.
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]I'm not sure that expense is a big issue when it comes to important issues like the clap but there are cheaper brands of Azithromycin as well, e.g Binozyt. Price is very low in comparison to mongering cost.
But I can't comment on best treatments as am not a doctor.[/QUOTE]
Mick Licker, the price of one box of five 250 miligram tablets of Zithromax is about 560 baht (of course one only takes four, a 1g dose. - not unlike the oft-malented missmatch between the quantity of hotdogs and buns). I rarely pay that much for sex, so Zithromax is more expensive than the act which occasions its use. But thanks so much for the tip about 'Binozyt'! How much does that run, in your experience?
Alas, in spite of many replies I still do not know how to communicate my exhortation to the lady in question.
Opebo, I think you're just scared that if she goes to a doctor, she will find out HOW she got an infection and refuse to have bareback sex with you any more.
Medicating her without a professional diagnosis would be totally irresponsible. She needs a full STI check, 'coz she could have any number of additional infections on top of the clap. She also obviously needs some sexual health education - you can't just tell her that she has an infection and give her antibiotics and risk her not understanding HOW she caught it or how to protect herself from it in the future. If she got it from her boyfriend or from another regular client, she's just gonna end up re-infected anyway, unless [i]those[/i] people are also made aware of the infection. She needs the full story, which she will not get from you just throwing her a packet of pills.
As for how to convey all this to the girl, go to [url]www.empowerfoundation.org[/url] and email the contact number at the bottom of the page. The people at the other end speak fluent English. Describe the scenario to them and ask them how to say what you need to say to the girl. They will also be able to provide you with details of free clinics, etc.
Don't take advantage of this girl's vulnerability and put her health at risk for your own selfish reasons. Talk to Empower and get her to a doctor.
[quote=rubber nursey]opebo, i think you're just scared that if she goes to a doctor, she will find out how she got an infection and refuse to have bareback sex with you any more.[/quote]
i thank you for your efforts, rubber, though they are of no help in answering the question i posed. i would just like to state, however, that it is somewhat offensive and condescending that you would assume this woman is ignorant of how one gets a minor infection in the [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord134][CodeWord134][/url]-hole.
perhaps, to be fair, you have an inaccurate mental picture - the woman is pushing 30, is free to come and go from the brothel at will (being a full thai citizen with id and everything). like all thais, she has had an earful of 'safe sex' propaganda from birth, as well as a basic education in 'science'. her choice to provide bareback was an informed one, and quite reasonable - the risks are low or minor, and there is really no other way to get an overpaying regular.
my first sentence was sarcasm. the rest of the post was in no way intended to be condescending or offensive to the girl in question. she can choose to do whatever she wants with her body, so long as the choice is an informed one.
i'm not suggesting this woman is 'ignorant' at all - just that perhaps she's not quite as 'informed' as you claim she is. in the time that it took you to develop symptoms, cure the clap, catch it from her again, develop symptoms and cure it again, it seems she has not even discovered that she has an infection. to me, this either says she is not undergoing regular sti tests and/or has sought and received treatment but is ill-informed on the matter of re-infection. (perhaps another client just handed her a packet of antibiotics and told her that would fix everything?)
and unlike most of the other posters, i [i]did[/i] try to answer the question you posed. empower would be more than happy to help you with your translation and assist this woman to access treatment.
ps. chlamydia is not a 'minor infection of the [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord134][CodeWord134][/url]-hole'. in women, untreated chlamydia can cause anything from period problems to pelvic inflammatory disease - which can cause severe pain and bleeding, ectopic pregnancy, infertility and, in rare cases, death. not so minor at all.
[QUOTE=Rubber Nursey]In the time that it took you to develop symptoms, cure the clap, catch it from her again, develop symptoms and cure it again, it seems she has not even discovered that she has an infection.[/QUOTE]
The asymptomatic nature of this infection in women is famous, Rubber, and is perhaps the main reason for its spread.
[QUOTE=Opebo]The asymptomatic nature of this infection in women is famous, Rubber, and is perhaps the main reason for its spread.[/QUOTE]
A large majority of STIs are asymptomatic in women. That's why the only way for women to be sure of their status is to have regular STI testing. But regular testing, and treatment when infected, means nothing if she keeps going back to the original source of her infection.
In my opinion, one of the main reasons for the spread of STIs is people's inability, or unwillingness, to disclose their STI status to others they may have already infected. You said you've caught the infection from this woman twice now - did you have unprotected sex with any [i]other[/i] sex workers in that time? Did you go back and tell those girls they may be at risk, once you found out? How many clients did those other workers have after you, who then went out and infected other sex workers...or took it back to their wives and girlfriends (who then went and infected the milkman ;))?
Don't take this as a personal attack at all - I'm just using your situation as an example of how infections multiply exponentially. Giving this girl antibiotics that may or may not treat an infection that she may or may not have, will not help anyone. She needs to know exactly what she has and be treated by a doctor and then she needs to isolate the source of her infection to prevent re-infection, otherwise she's just gonna be on an endless STI merry-go-round...and infect countless other clients and sex workers in the process.
Opebo,
If you and the girl(s) you're doing want to go bareback, and are also infected, why are you bothering to post here in the "Safe Sex in Thailand" forum, and ask for information?? I don't see the point really??
So far you've knocked back every form of useful advice below, anyhow. What kind of answer are you seeking?? You want a Thai translation?? Go to a language website.. there's plently around.
I think the best thing would be to just let natural attrition / evolution of the human race replace people, with the same philosophy as yourself, who are intent on harming themselves and others with intentional unsafe sex and then infection of others.
Just do what you want (which you are in any case), and let nature take care of the rest.
[QUOTE=Opebo]Thank you Bumholes for your common sense and useful information. Alas I am allergic to the Cipro-Norfloxacin family.
>>Firstly, if you put it in use a condom!
No. To stay at home abstaining and masturbating would be more fun than that, SS.
Actually, the girls who cater to farang are far more apt to go bareback than these in the Thai-oriented industry. A majority of farang visitors prefer bareback sex, while most Thais use condoms.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Opebo]Actually, the girls who cater to farang are far more apt to go bareback than these in the Thai-oriented industry. A majority of farang visitors prefer bareback sex, while most Thais use condoms. [/QUOTE]Opebo,
I am not going to sit there and badger you with "Bareback this and Bareback that", this is your life and you are i guess adult enough to understand the consequenses of your actions.
the thing I do not agree with is your above comment. The Girls who cater to Farang, ALL have Thai Boyfriends... and, trust me, the Thai Boyfriends do not wear condoms. Yes, when Thais visit a "Brothel", they might wear protection, but slim to none are the chances of them wearing a rubber when with their girlfriends.
Exactly. I have a number of Chinese & Azn guy friends in my home city.. they hate wearing condoms on the best of occasions (in brothels) let alone with GFs. Yes they go over the top with showers, saunas, and other "hygiene" habits, but condoms- no (Just like the girls will all use tonnes of Listerine gargle in the hopes that it somehow stops STDs lol.
The Thais I know here (or in LOS) don't seem too enthusiastic to wear condoms either. A Thai wearing a cover with his GF is plain laughable.. and did you ever meet a bargirl who aimed at farangs, and who didn't have a Thai BF or Thai waster on the receiving end somewhere??
[QUOTE=NicFrenchy]Opebo,
I am not going to sit there and badger you with "Bareback this and Bareback that", this is your life and you are i guess adult enough to understand the consequenses of your actions.
the thing I do not agree with is your above comment. The Girls who cater to Farang, ALL have Thai Boyfriends... and, trust me, the Thai Boyfriends do not wear condoms. Yes, when Thais visit a "Brothel", they might wear protection, but slim to none are the chances of them wearing a rubber when with their girlfriends.[/QUOTE]
Message deleted by author.
Note to self: Do not feed the trolls.
[QUOTE=Opebo]I hope it is not I to whom you are referring, Rubber Nursey. ?"[/QUOTE]
Opebo. I dislike you a lot, and I never cease to be amazed with the shite you write. You pretend that you have a huge grasp of the English language.
Well mate, if you knew anything about English you would realise that the sentence should have read '... not me to whom you are referring...'.
You are the object of the sentence, therefore the accusative case 'me' is correct. 'I' is only used when there is an understood qualification. I'll not bother explaining it to you because you'll just come back with some inane comment, because you are always right, but check it out if you don't believe me.
Just to make you feel better, OTH recently used 'etc, etc'. This again is a common mistake as etc means and so on and it is superflous in English to use it more than once.
Then you see, I may only be a a dumb ex-policeman, but my education was excellent,and I have subsequently achieved further qualifications, including a diploma from the Australian College of Journalism.
If you're going to play with the English language and pretend you are some literary giant, get the basics right. Just like your knowledge of sexually transmitted diseases and microbiology, get the basics right.
BTW, you will probably find typos in this, but that's down to my fingers, not my brain.
And in fact in all honesty, after reading the sentence it should say ... not me to whom you refer.. !
[QUOTE=Petemcc]Just to make you feel better, OTH recently used 'etc, etc'. This again is a common mistake as etc means and so on and it is superflous in English to use it more than once.[/QUOTE]
If I am nothing else, I too am superfluous, and so on, and so on...and so on, after that. ;)
Yadda yadda yadda
No, I wasn't referring to you, Opebo. I posted a message in anger and haste, regretted it and deleted it - apparently not soon enough, though.
[i]Please[/i] contact Empower for your translation. There is nobody better suited to assist you.
[QUOTE=Opebo]
I think you fail to understand only one aspect of my tale - in small towns there are few options in terms of hookers, so you have little choice but to go traveling or return to the same girls.
[/QUOTE]
I have been following this thread over recent days, and since Mr Opebo and I have a couple of things in common, I thought I would offer some moral support.
I too live out in the sticks, and when wishing to monger have to avail myself of what is in the locality. Usually not a lot!. They are either old, fat or ugly, and many times a combination of all 3. When I find a girl who is a cut above the others, and provides not only a good service, but is prepared to adapt to my peccadillos, then naturally I would wish to see her again. Not only does a good rapport develop between us, but both she and I look forward to our future get togethers. She continues to provide good service +, and would be a fool not too. I get to teach her new techniques.
Most mongers submitting to this and other forums have the advantage of living in or near the main mongering grounds of Bangkok, Pattaya or Phuket, and have such a large variety of girls available to them, that they have no need to concern themselves with the girls continuing good health. Fuck them once and move on to the next attractive one.
So I have much sympathy for Mr Opebo with his current dilemma. Naturally he wishes to see his regular girl restored to full health, so that he can continue his liaison with her without health problems to himself. However, as other contributors have mentioned, whilst a dose of Zithromax will in all probability cure her current predicament, she may very well be re-infected should she have sex again with the man who originally infected her, be it punter or boyfriend. Mr Opebo needs more than just a translation of how and why she should take the Zithromax. He needs somehow to instill in her not only the need to practice safe sex, but the reasons why, even if he is able to persuade her that she may continue to provide him and him alone with unprotected sex.
Of course, should Mr Opebo live anywhere near me, then it is conceivable that we occasionally share the same lass, and the modification of safe sex referred to above should be equally extended to Bumholes!
[QUOTE=Opebo] I hope it is not I to whom you are referring, Rubber Nursey. [/QUOTE]By the process of elimination, dear Opebo, RN probably was referring to you.
As for your translation request, a non-troll would ask only once. After being ignored by sensible members, a non-troll would soon get the message and desist. A troll would persist by repeating the request several times.
I still think you need to get checked for syphilis. Blood test will do it nicely. Nothing to be afraid of, surely.
[QUOTE=Piper1]By the process of elimination, dear Opebo, RN probably was referring to you. ...
[/QUOTE]Piper1,
I am actually surprised that somebody replied to Opebo's request. It is so ridiculous - and dangerously ignorant.
"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." (Martin Luther King Jr.)
Giotto
[QUOTE=Giotto]Piper1,
I am actually surprised that somebody replied to Opebo's request.[/QUOTE]You know me - always willing to help. :D
[QUOTE=Opebo]I have a safe sex related question which involves the use of Thai language:
I have a regular down at the upcountry brothel I see maybe once a week, who alas now has the clap (either gonorrhea or clamydia or both), I believe due to previous visits I made to her just after returning from Pattaya, land of clap. Now I have cured myself of those ailments, but have found that I have been reinfected by this woman on subequent visits. She is of course like most women apparently asymptomatic.
Therefore, I need to approach her with a nice new unopened box of Zithromax, and persuade her to take it, but alas she speaks not a word of English. Can someone relate in simple Thai this basic story:
"Last time I saw you I got a little drip, and went to the doctor. He gave me this (Zithromax), and when I took it I was all better. So, can you please take this {pointing to Zithromax} so we can keep seeing each other?"
I realize the best method of persuasion is a nice tip, but I want to be able to communicate to assuage any fears she may have that I'm a mad poisoner - we farangs are known for being psychos.[/QUOTE]
She sounds like a girl I must of had sex with while not using condoms.
Oh well, Opebo, seems that all that bare backing has finally caught up with you. Not having learned this life lesson, you now proceed to self medicate and advise others. You even offer medication to a 'friend'. She may be allergic, has unknown medical conditions etc...
I am sorry, you are a fool. Hookers are Hookers for a reason. Poor, uneducated with few choices. Many can't read and are completely ignorant towards proper use of pharmaceuticals.
Ground rule in Thailand. Don't mix and mingle with hookers unless it's for sex!
[QUOTE=Opebo]I have a safe sex related question which involves the use of Thai language:
I have a regular down at the upcountry brothel I see maybe once a week, who alas now has the clap (either gonorrhea or clamydia or both), I believe due to previous visits I made to her just after returning from Pattaya, land of clap. Now I have cured myself of those ailments, but have found that I have been reinfected by this woman on subequent visits. She is of course like most women apparently asymptomatic.
Therefore, I need to approach her with a nice new unopened box of Zithromax, and persuade her to take it, but alas she speaks not a word of English. Can someone relate in simple Thai this basic story:
"Last time I saw you I got a little drip, and went to the doctor. He gave me this (Zithromax), and when I took it I was all better. So, can you please take this {pointing to Zithromax} so we can keep seeing each other?"
I realize the best method of persuasion is a nice tip, but I want to be able to communicate to assuage any fears she may have that I'm a mad poisoner - we farangs are known for being psychos.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Opebo]Mick Licker, the price of one box of five 250 miligram tablets of Zithromax is about 560 baht (of course one only takes four, a 1g dose. - not unlike the oft-malented missmatch between the quantity of hotdogs and buns). I rarely pay that much for sex, so Zithromax is more expensive than the act which occasions its use. But thanks so much for the tip about 'Binozyt'! How much does that run, in your experience?
Alas, in spite of many replies I still do not know how to communicate my exhortation to the lady in question.[/QUOTE]
I believe that 'Binozyt' cheaper brand equivalent was about half the price.
While I am not totally against self medication due to the doctors treating me less than adequately when I had Chlamydia, I am not totally in favour of feeding the pill to the girl.
She needs to know she probably has the clap somehow.
You are best to communicate it the message to her perhaps by getting someone to write it in Thai. If she can't read, then you could perhaps make a recording of someone speaking in Thai e.g. on MP3 player or the like, or taking her to see a doctor directly.
There is no totally easy answer I fear, but you are right to be concerned about her being cured.
[QUOTE=Opebo]Mick Licker, the price of one box of five 250 miligram tablets of Zithromax is about 560 baht (of course one only takes four, a 1g dose. - not unlike the oft-malented missmatch between the quantity of hotdogs and buns).[/QUOTE]Putting aside all my other problems with this thread, the dose of azithromycin used to treat UNCOMPLICATED cases of gonorrhea is TWO grams in a single dose on an empty stomach. It is common, due to the cost, for third world doctors to prescribe the minimum dosage and hope for the best. This leads to obscuring the symptoms and assisting the development of resistant organisms.
That simply means, because you are too foolish to wear a condom but smart enough to practice medicine without a license, that expensive antibiotic may not work in the future.
I'm sure we all appreciate your contribution
[QUOTE=Animby]Putting aside all my other problems with this thread, the dose of azithromycin used to treat UNCOMPLICATED cases of gonorrhea is TWO grams in a single dose on an empty stomach. It is common, due to the cost, for third world doctors to prescribe the minimum dosage and hope for the best. This leads to obscuring the symptoms and assisting the development of resistant organisms.
That simply means, because you are too foolish to wear a condom but smart enough to practice medicine without a license, that expensive antibiotic may not work in the future.
I'm sure we all appreciate your contribution[/QUOTE]
Well said, exactly what I have been saying here for ages.
Animby is mistaken. 1g is recommended by more sources than 2g, and is almost always effective. There is no reason, Animby, to expose yourself to an excess amount of an antibiotic when the adequate sufficiency will do - there are, after all, side effects.
Please, in future, Animby, strive not to engage in ad hominem attack. The choice whether or not to use a condom is a matter of personal taste and priorities, not one of 'intelligence'.
[QUOTE=Opebo] Animby is mistaken. 1g is recommended by more sources than 2g, and is almost always effective.[/QUOTE]2g is recommended for syphilis.
[QUOTE=Opebo]The choice whether or not to use a condom is a matter of personal taste not one of 'intelligence'. [/QUOTE]A little research will show that there's a correlation between choosing not to use condoms, and lower IQ.
There's also a correlation between choosing not to use condoms, and 'hypermasculinity' (i.e., exaggeration of stereotypical male behavior to compensate for feelings of sexual inferiority).
So that's why I always use condoms. ;)
[QUOTE=Piper1]2g is recommended for syphilis.[/quote]
It cures that too? What a wonder drug! But of course syphilis is very rare.
[quote]There's also a correlation between choosing not to use condoms, and 'hypermasculinity' (i.e., exaggeration of stereotypical male behavior to compensate for feelings of sexual inferiority).
[/QUOTE]
Interesting, Piper. Please see my latest report in 'Other Areas' for a cowardly tale which proves that I am neither very masculine, nor at all embarrassed by that fact.
[QUOTE=Opebo] But of course syphilis is very rare. [/QUOTE]You're correct if you consider 1.2% of the Thai population having syphilis to be 'rare'. But being a prime candidate, you can multiply that at least ten-fold in your case. Minimum 12% chance? Time for a blood test.
[QUOTE=Piper1]You're correct if you consider 1.2% of the Thai population having syphilis to be 'rare'. But being a prime candidate, you can multiply that at least ten-fold in your case. Minimum 12% chance? Time for a blood test.[/QUOTE]
Who needs a blood test when you can self medicate?
HaHaHa (cavernous Vincent Price-like laugh)
I'm not going to get involved in a big back and forth here. You can take my word for what I say or doubt it. Don't bother me none. I am a medical doctor and I work all over the world.
The accepted dose of this medicine for NONgonoccal urethritis is one gram in a single dose. For Gonococcal urethritis (ie gonnorhea) the recommended dose is TWO grams in a single dose.
Sorry, but this med is not recommended for the treatment of syphillis without specific culture to demonstrate sensitivity.
Taking too much of an antibiotic (within dosage limits) will do no harm. Taking too little leads to hiding symptoms, incomplete cures and resistant bacteria.
Condom use? Yes, it is a matter of personal choice. But so is putting on a blindfold and trying to cross the street in Bangkok. Both are also foolish. I don't know if either activity has a direct correlation to IQ. But I suspect they do.
That's my last on this subject. I don't wish to argue.
Here a link everyone should read before falling for the stupid idea of self medication promoted here by some notorious fools who have a share in the responsibility for such an outcome.
[post]585922[/post]
Thanks Tiger. Azithromycin is not a flouroquinolone, it is a macrolide antibiotic. But the problem is just the same. The gonoccocal bacteria is rapid in it's mutation to these drugs. That's why it's important to treat correctly. Take too small a dose and you kill off the easy bugs leaving the strong ones to reproduce.
Ah, for the good old days when a shot of penicillin would fix everything up.
[QUOTE=Animby]Thanks Tiger. Azithromycin is not a flouroquinolone, it is a macrolide antibiotic. But the problem is just the same. The gonoccocal bacteria is rapid in it's mutation to these drugs. That's why it's important to treat correctly. Take too small a dose and you kill off the easy bugs leaving the strong ones to reproduce.
Ah, for the good old days when a shot of penicillin would fix everything up.[/QUOTE]
I love you guys. I've been telling idiots this stuff for ages. We are rapidly heading to the time where science cannot keep up with bacteria. These little fucks go through thousands of years of evolution in the space of 2 monger days.
Dick head doctors fucked up with antibiotics for teh last 20 years, now dick head mongers are making things worse.
The easiest way to avoid a dose is not to get one in the first place. Fuck, it's so simple. Hopefully these fucks will realise that only 70 years ago, people died from simple infections. With MRSA and the rapidly growing trend toward self medication of the most powerful Abs available, we are heading for that day once again.
These fucks also forget that STI bacteria will exchange DNA and hence resistance with normal flora, which can cause serious problems when equilibrium is upset.
But what's the point, eh? Those who are responsible will, those selfish fucks who don't care, don't care!
[QUOTE=Petemcc]I love you guys. I've been telling idiots this stuff for ages. We are rapidly heading to the time where science cannot keep up with bacteria. These little fucks go through thousands of years of evolution in the space of 2 monger days.
Dick head doctors fucked up with antibiotics for teh last 20 years, now dick head mongers are making things worse.
The easiest way to avoid a dose is not to get one in the first place. Fuck, it's so simple. Hopefully these fucks will realise that only 70 years ago, people died from simple infections. With MRSA and the rapidly growing trend toward self medication of the most powerful Abs available, we are heading for that day once again.
These fucks also forget that STI bacteria will exchange DNA and hence resistance with normal flora, which can cause serious problems when equilibrium is upset.
But what's the point, eh? Those who are responsible will, those selfish fucks who don't care, don't care![/QUOTE]
There is always someone who doesn't care, therefore trouble is there at multiples necessary. That applies to all walks of life. And its not always as simple as in Dr. O'placebo's case.
Occasionally I want take a HIV test and sometimes I check a girl too if I plan to stay longer with her. At Bumrungrad they require now that you see a doctor first, the cost will be around 2000 TB. Does anyone know a place to take reliable HIV tests at a reasonable cost?
Thanks for your help.
[QUOTE=Lone Punter]Occasionally I want take a HIV test and sometimes I check a girl too if I plan to stay longer with her. At Bumrungrad they require now that you see a doctor first, the cost will be around 2000 TB. Does anyone know a place to take reliable HIV tests at a reasonable cost?
Thanks for your help.[/QUOTE]
There are many small medical clinics who will do a blood test for you, result tomorrow, for just a few hundred baht (so little I forget the fee). Check clinics in the bar areas, e.g. near Nana Plaza or Patpong or Soi Cowboy etc.
I went to a small clinic near corner of Ratchaparop and Din Daeng in Pratunam district but this was convenient because was staying at Century Park Hotel.
If they ask why you are being tested, just say your girlfriend asked you to get a test (to be sure).
[QUOTE=Lone Punter]Occasionally I want take a HIV test and sometimes I check a girl too if I plan to stay longer with her. At Bumrungrad they require now that you see a doctor first, the cost will be around 2000 TB. Does anyone know a place to take reliable HIV tests at a reasonable cost?
Thanks for your help.[/QUOTE]Mick's reply was good. One more thing, if you believe you have been exposed, it is not enough to have a test done. You must have a SECOND test done 4 to 6 months later. If BOTH are negative, lovely. If either is positive, sorry charlie. Same applies to the girl. If you want to go bareback with someone you're gonna be with for a while, remember one test is not enough. If it's gonna be a LONG while and you believe (probably falsely) she will be monogamous with you, get a second test after 6 months before throwing away the condoms.
While you're waiting for time to pass, you can listen to Monty Python's venereal disease song over and over for other things to worry about.
Thanks a lot Licker for your suggestion! What would this board be without contributors like you. Always eager to check your pics, I will never forget that tiny ass from one of your former playmates.
I came back from Pattaya and kept this 21 year old ago go girl for most of the time I was there, will post pics soon.
Prior to my visit to Los I bought couple of Home test kits from the Net.
Its cost about £12.00 per kit and cost much less if you buy bulk.
Its called Mirrates Hiv Home test and its reliable.
I used it on her even though she had her own cert but wanted to make sure,its gives result after 15 minutes.
I know there is no way to find out about other ST's but this is the main one,anyway I banged this slim chick ass and pussy.
carry on and be safe!!
Abse2
[QUOTE=Abse2]I came back from Pattaya and kept this 21 year old ago go girl for most of the time I was there, will post pics soon.
Prior to my visit to Los I bought couple of Home test kits from the Net.
Its cost about £12.00 per kit and cost much less if you buy bulk.
Its called Mirrates Hiv Home test and its reliable.
I used it on her even though she had her own cert but wanted to make sure,its gives result after 15 minutes.
I know there is no way to find out about other ST's but this is the main one,anyway I banged this slim chick ass and pussy.
carry on and be safe!!
Abse2[/QUOTE]
Are you fucking mad or what? I'm not going to waste bandwith writing 10,000 words on how fucked up that is. Try doing some research about HIV, the time it takes antibodies to appear, the tests, and everything else.
Hey Abse2, looK you do what you want but I can tell you that the test you are talking about are shit. Let say the girl fuck all week before you meet her with out condon the test will never never find if she is HIV+. For a test it takes at best 6 weeks but to be really certain 3 to 6 months is the time it takes. If such test exist tell me why the are not used in hospital?
Bye
Sun Rise
She my regular date in pattaya, I knew that it may flair up some hot air.
The best bareback ass fucking with Nuch.
[QUOTE=Sun Rise]For a test it takes at best 6 weeks but to be really certain 3 to 6 months is the time it takes. If such test exist tell me why the are not used in hospital?
Sun Rise[/QUOTE]
Sun,
There are tests that can check for HIV after about 3 days from exposure. The tests that take a long time look for HIV antibodies which take a while time to develop in a human. The rapid tests which are 98% accurate 3 to 7 days after exposure and 99%+ accurate after 1 week, test for the virus itself. The reason they are more accurate is the longer the virus is in a persons system the more it has replicated itself so the more likely it is detected. These tests cost more than the antibody test so they are not the standard for general HIV testing. As far as I know they are also not available in the rapid HIV tests that are available on the market. If you go to a good hospital or clinic they should be able to run that test and give you the results in about 72 hours.
PIT
Read this, according to latest NEJM article, those of us who luv daty are more susceptible to HPV virus.
Good news - there's a vaccine out.
This is news to me.. I get regular check-ups between partners, and the modern/top clinics still recommend getting a test after around 3-4 weeks of exposure minimum.
As for the dude who posted about some Internet test kit for $20 lol.. man, u dont need a test kit.. u need a wing and a prayer. Like some other dude pointed out, if she had accepted bare back off you (and anal on top of that!!), she's been around the world already, and probably a few hours before she hopped into your bed. good luck lol.
[QUOTE=PassinThrough]Sun,
There are tests that can check for HIV after about 3 days from exposure. The tests that take a long time look for HIV antibodies which take a while time to develop in a human. The rapid tests which are 98% accurate 3 to 7 days after exposure and 99%+ accurate after 1 week, test for the virus itself. The reason they are more accurate is the longer the virus is in a persons system the more it has replicated itself so the more likely it is detected. These tests cost more than the antibody test so they are not the standard for general HIV testing. As far as I know they are also not available in the rapid HIV tests that are available on the market. If you go to a good hospital or clinic they should be able to run that test and give you the results in about 72 hours.
PIT[/QUOTE]
While I was waiting at a sexual health clinic a few months back, I read one of the wall posters regarding a new anti-HIV 'morning after' medicine.
It said that if you'd had unsafe sex within the previous 48 hours, and were worried you'd exposed yourself to HIV, there's a new medication that will prevent HIV from developing (80% success rate if caught within 48 hours). How they measured this in clinical trials, I don't know.
Maybe Animby or another medical professional can provide more info on this new technology.
Ok I see were are going in many directions here. I give you an example. Let say that a nurse gets hurt by a needle when she is doing a shoot to an HIV+ patient what do you think will happen? She will be put on treatment made for people that just got infected. This treatment is very very heavy for your body it's not like taking an aspirin and in 80-90% of the case after 6 months she will be negative. So if the best hospitals in the USA had a test that could tell you almost on the spot you are + or - don't you think the will use it so there nurse or doctors don't have to take all this costly and heavy treatment. So to really know if you have or she as HVI there are not many solution one test after 3 months and the other one after 6 months. And you have to use a condom in this 6 months period. This is the safe and the normal procedure. If you guys after want to take the risk and trust what a prostitute tells you and all the shit you can find on the net about miracles test or drugs and HIV it's hope to you.
Sun rise
[QUOTE=PassinThrough]Sun,
There are tests that can check for HIV after about 3 days from exposure. The tests that take a long time look for HIV antibodies which take a while time to develop in a human. The rapid tests which are 98% accurate 3 to 7 days after exposure and 99%+ accurate after 1 week, test for the virus itself. The reason they are more accurate is the longer the virus is in a persons system the more it has replicated itself so the more likely it is detected. These tests cost more than the antibody test so they are not the standard for general HIV testing. As far as I know they are also not available in the rapid HIV tests that are available on the market. If you go to a good hospital or clinic they should be able to run that test and give you the results in about 72 hours.
PIT[/QUOTE]
Hello,
I believe the test you're referring to is the PCR-DNA test wich is used in the porn industry. I've gotten this test done before and it will be the only test I will get done in the future. It can detect the virus usually no longer than a week after infection. It costs $160 to get it done. You go to a certain clinic and they take your blood sample and Fed Ex it to AIM in Los Angeles and they test it there. The common antibody test is a flawed test and shouldn't be taken in my opinion. It is important to point out that the ELISA test which is the most commonly used test has the highest percentage of false positives. Only 30% or so of positive ELISA tests are confirmed on a PCR-DNA test which tests for the virus itself. If you want to avoid some serious mental anguish over a potential false positive it is strongly advised to get the more sophisticated test done instead. The peace of mind is priceless in my view.
Keep in mind though that the pornstar Darren James who caught the virus in Brazil and returned to "work" in LA being HIV+ (and infected three others) took the PCR test and cleared it. Even this sophisticated test didn't catch it in time, so no test is 100% concrete.
Please no preachers needed, just be sure where and which ink you lot dipped
your pen into.
You all coming up with yr own assumptions and none you have any knowledge
at all.
[QUOTE=Abse2]Please no preachers needed, just be sure where and which ink you lot dipped
your pen into.
You all coming up with yr own assumptions and none you have any knowledge
at all.[/QUOTE]Abse2,
You think the girl you are referring to as your Pattaya regular only has sex with you? I am sure her Thai Boyfriend(s) take her bareback, she most probably will deny this but she is playing Russian Roulette with her life and Yours.
No matter what can be written here, people who go Bareback are exposed to Viruses and with Today's means of information and prevention, if you catch the virus, you deserve it!
Play with Fire and inevitable one day you will get burned.
Just reading this thread gives me goosebumbs. Thinking of barebacking anal in Pattaya must be a result of complete denial.
Abse2, please do us all a favour, never venture to BKK and/or any sopies, MP's mentioned in this forum!
JB
[QUOTE=NicFrenchy]Abse2, You think the girl you are referring to as your Pattaya regular only has sex with you? I am sure her Thai Boyfriend(s) take her bareback, she most probably will deny this but she is playing Russian Roulette with her life and Yours.
No matter what can be written here, people who go Bareback are exposed to Viruses and with Today's means of information and prevention, if you catch the virus, you deserve it!
Play with Fire and inevitable one day you will get burned.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Abse2]
Please no preachers needed, just be sure where and which ink you lot dipped
your pen into.You all coming up with yr own assumptions and none you have any knowledge
at all.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Abse2] She my regular date in pattaya, I knew that it may flair up some hot air. The best bareback ass fucking with Nuch.[/QUOTE]
Thats why all the white english guys are married to these disease riddled thai *****s out in Bangkok and Pattaya, they get kicked out from their homes here in u.k and go and find their true love in Thailand.(funny)
And most of the times to fucking drunk to notice if they have condom or not,thats why how manytimes you fucked bareback.
when the plan comes together,I thought this thread is a bit boring so put a few quotes on to discuss bareback,I know all your guys eyes just light up when this subject is touched.
Please lets have some more keep this Safe Sex in Thailand section going.
Anyways of to sunny Dubai.
I got to clean my Thai rubber dolly!!
I must say I am pretty open to anything, but those are the nastiest set of [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] flaps I have ever seen. I like the lips high and tight, not dragging on the floor.
Disgusting.
She could feed a family of 4 with those things flapping in the breeze. No wonder you fucked her ass.
[url]http://internationalsexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=70889[/url]
[QUOTE=1Ball]I must say I am pretty open to anything, but those are the nastiest set of [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] flaps I have ever seen. I like the lips high and tight, not dragging on the floor.
Disgusting.
She could feed a family of 4 with those things flapping in the breeze. No wonder you fucked her ass.
[url]http://internationalsexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=70889[/url][/QUOTE]I like them pussy lips big. The bigger the better.
Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (HIV PEP)
There's heaps of info online if you're interested. The main thing is that it's certainly not a simple 'morning after medicine'. It's a month or more of at least two antiretroviral drugs...ie. the drugs they give HIV/AIDS patients. You'd want to be pretty damn sure the person you had sex with was HIV positive before you put yourself through all that!
[QUOTE=Piper1]While I was waiting at a sexual health clinic a few months back, I read one of the wall posters regarding a new anti-HIV 'morning after' medicine.
It said that if you'd had unsafe sex within the previous 48 hours, and were worried you'd exposed yourself to HIV, there's a new medication that will prevent HIV from developing (80% success rate if caught within 48 hours). How they measured this in clinical trials, I don't know.
Maybe Animby or another medical professional can provide more info on this new technology.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Piper1]While I was waiting at a sexual health clinic a few months back, I read one of the wall posters regarding a new anti-HIV 'morning after' medicine. [/QUOTE]Sorry. I've left Egypt and am happily ensconced in the LOS. The little brown lovelies leave little time for reading the forum.
There is no "morning after" pill for HIV. It's that simple. Post known exposure, there is a recommended four WEEK treatment with up to four various antiretroviral drugs.
Those drugs are very expensive, have many nasty side-effects and, as we all know, have very little ability to "cure" an HIV infection. Taken early and appropriately, they do offer a fair chance of avoiding infection after exposure.
I think condoms are a lot less expensive, easier on the body and more effective.
BTW, someone mentioned a home test kit for HIV. Sorry. There are NONE that are approved for this purpose (and I just did a quick MedLine search to make sure my knowledge was not outdated). There are some companies who offer home collections systems but these must then be sent off to a laboratory for analysis.
I used to work in central Africa and we had access to a latex protein agglutination test that gave results in 10-12 hours. Problem was it had a very high rate of false negatives. In other words, it missed a lot of infections.
And, as has already been mentioned, the best test in the world may miss an infection that is only a few days or even weeks old.
Hey, I don't like 'em, either but, please, use a condom!
Safe sex at its best!!(Awesome pics)
taken from D.K lee(china) section.
I haven't done oral sex on a thai girl yet - I hesitate because I'm affraid of getting an STD like herpes or ghonorea. On the other hand, it would be very nice :-) !!! Have any of you guys ever gotten an STD thru oral/DATY ? I not looking for any official statistics (everything in life can kill you...), rather your experiences and fist hand advice.
Thanks
I got chlamydia once. Most likely from a BBBJ. Very unpleasant but relatively easily dealt with.
I've done DATY on >100 girls over the years and never got anything as far as I can tell. But sure as hell, it can be that the first time you try it yourself you get it. Life can be a ***** and with sex there's always a minimal risk you're catching something even if you are careful.
For me, paid sex without DATY, without a BBBJ and without kissing just doesn't do it (I always cover up for intercourse, though). But you're not gonna get this without a price, i.e. taking some small risk.
I completely agree with Animby that there is no "morning after" pill for HIV. There's a antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis but this is neither guaranteed to work nor without side effect. Here's what wikipedia says on the subject:
[QUOTE]In the case of HIV infection, post-exposure prophylaxis is a course of antiretroviral drugs which is thought to reduce the risk of seroconversion after events with high risk of exposure to HIV (e.g. unprotected anal or vaginal sex, needlestick injuries, or sharing needles). To be effective, it must be started as soon as possible after exposure and ideally within an hour [1]. The treatment for HIV lasts four weeks [2].
While there is compelling data to suggest that PEP after HIV exposure is extremely effective, there have been cases where it has failed. The regimen can be very demanding and have unpleasant side effects including malaise, fatigue, diarrhoea, headaches, nausea and vomiting [3].
According to one Australian study, two thirds of people taking PEP experienced mild to moderate side effects and one quarter of people taking PEP experienced severe side effects.[/QUOTE]Regarding the HIV test kit, FDA indeed approved a rapid HIV test kit which gives results in as little as 20 minutes. Here's a link providing the information:
[url]http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2002/NEW00852.html[/url]
I don't think it's endorsed as an over-the-counter self-test kit, though. So, I'm not sure what you get if you order from one of these dubious internet firms selling home self-test kit. Beware also this is an antibody test, so it only gives reliable results after 12 weeks or more after HIV infection.
[QUOTE=McJohn]...But sure as hell, it can be that the first time you try it yourself you get it. Life can be a ***** and with sex there's always a minimal risk you're catching something even if you are careful. [/QUOTE]McJohn You're absolutely right! I was asking, because I am married (happily!) and I have some stopovers in Bangkok each year. P4P is just a short adventure there for me, just a thrill. I am happy with my whife and wouldn't want to loose or hurt her - so she should never ever find out (!!!). Bringing home a std would be very hard to explain and would infect her too. I would never want that. So I "eat" at home and only have protected sex the few times when I am in Bangkok
[QUOTE=McJohn]the HIV test kit, FDA indeed approved a rapid HIV test kit which gives results in as little as 20 minutes.
Beware also this is an antibody test, so it only gives reliable results after 12 weeks or more after HIV infection.[/QUOTE]I believe I mentioned I used this test (rapid latex agglutination) when I ran a clinic in Angola. To the best of my knowledge it has not been approved for home use. Since agglutination tests can be very subjective, I doubt it will be in it’s current form.
As to your comment about 12 weeks. Yes. And No. Antibodies to the HIV virus can take even longer than 3 months to respond. Usually, we recommend a negative test be confirmed six months later.
The problem with that, of course, is that people who exhibit the type of risky behavior that brought them to the clinic in the first place are unlikely to remain celibate during the ensuing six months.
[QUOTE=Higgins T]I haven't done oral sex on a thai girl yet - I hesitate because I'm affraid of getting an STD like herpes or ghonorea....[/QUOTE]I never do oral on Thai women. Because I'm afraid of STD's. Some STD's like Syphilis, Herpes, HPV (causes warts and cancer), and HIV can lie dormant for years after you get an infection. But eventually they can cause some serious health problems for you.
Just because someone has done a lot of unprotected oral sex on Thai women and feels ok now, doesn't necessarily mean that he will be ok in the future.
I used to like doing oral on women. But to avoid possible infections, I've learned to enjoy masturbating women with my well-lubricated hand instead.
It's the woman's excitement and orgasm that matters to me. And I've found that making a woman orgasm with my hand is even better and easier than with my mouth. My hand is a lot stronger than my tongue. And my fine-movement control over my fingers is a lot better than it is over my tongue. I can stimulate the woman in many more ways with my fingers than I can with my tongue.
If you are going to do unportected oral sex on Thai women despite the dangers. Then I suggest that you rinse your mouth with mouthwash immediately afterwards. Mouthwash is designed to kill bacteria. And it may kill some viruses too. It won't give you 100% safety. But it will probably decrease your chances of getting an infection.
I know because I got it.
I did an Eden Club double act. One of the girls (the one my choice chose as her partner) looked a bit pale and sick but I didn't think too much about it.
We fucked every which way, and each time both of them put a new condom on me. I'm 100% sure none broke.
The sick looking one gave me the blow job of my life -- and a strain of gonnorhea which I gave to my long-time girl friend in Germany (not impressed), and which the doctors at Berlin's most prestigious hospital Charite, could not cure.
In the end I had to go to a doctor who specialised in gay men's diseases and I had a series of shots in the ass at daily intervals.
The doc explained that the gonnococal germ can live in the mucous membranes of the throat.
You've been warned.
If you are positive as to how you contracted this, I would hope that you have contacted the establishment so that they can get the girl some medical attention and see that she does not give this to another person.
[QUOTE=Lama Di Bali]I know because I got it.
I did an Eden Club double act. One of the girls (the one my choice chose as her partner) looked a bit pale and sick but I didn't think too much about it.
We fucked every which way, and each time both of them put a new condom on me. I'm 100% sure none broke.
The sick looking one gave me the blow job of my life -- and a strain of gonnorhea which I gave to my long-time girl friend in Germany (not impressed), and which the doctors at Berlin's most prestigious hospital Charite, could not cure.
In the end I had to go to a doctor who specialised in gay men's diseases and I had a series of shots in the ass at daily intervals.
The doc explained that the gonnococal germ can live in the mucous membranes of the throat.
You've been warned.[/QUOTE]
IMHO,
getting a Gohonorrea from Blow Job : very hard .
getting Clamydida from BJ : almost impossible.
getting syphilis from BJ : almost impossible.
getting HIV from BJ : almost impossible.
getting Herpes HSV from BJ : very easy.
Let the girl gargle with some Listerint before the job, sometime it did help.
If the girl got warts on her hand It's possible to get warts on penis having an handjob as well...
[QUOTE=MarcoStraight]IMHO,
getting a Gohonorrea from Blow Job : very hard .
getting Clamydida from BJ : almost impossible.
getting syphilis from BJ : almost impossible.
getting HIV from BJ : almost impossible.
getting Herpes HSV from BJ : very easy.
Let the girl gargle with some Listerint before the job, sometime it did help.
If the girl got warts on her hand It's possible to get warts on penis having an handjob as well...[/QUOTE]You can have your humble opinion.
In the humble opinion of the foremost venereologist working in Berlin, it is commonplace for the gonorrhea bacteria to live in the throat if the girl has given a blow job to a man who has the disease.
He says he sees it all the time in gay men.
It does not live in the mouth, it colonises the throat, so all the listerine in the world is not going to make a rat's ass of a difference.
The blow job I got was the ONLY unprotected sex I had and I have long ago given up the notion that I can get it from toilet seats.
[QUOTE=MarcoStraight]...getting a Gohonorrea from Blow Job : very hard ...
[/QUOTE]
I did some time ago. Easier to cure in my case though, and I luckily didn't pass it on to anyone.
I found some information on this subject from the San Francisco City Clinic:
According to their information, a woman performing unprotected oral sex on a man is lot more dangerous in terms of disease transmission than is a man doing DATY on a woman.
A woman doing oral on a man can trasmit the following infections: Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Hepaptitis A, Herpes, HPV, Shigella, and Syphylis. It's also possible to get HIV and Hepatitis B this way, although such infections through oral sex are rare.
But according this site, a man doing oral on the lady is at risk of getting only Herpes and possibly HPV.
[url]http://www.dph.sf.ca.us/sfcityclinic/stdbasics/stdchart.asp[/url]
[QUOTE=MarcoStraight]IMHO,
getting a Gohonorrea from Blow Job : very hard .
getting Clamydida from BJ : almost impossible.
<cut>
[/QUOTE]
IMHO your HO isn't worth much.
Clamydia is quite easy to catch. Research the Internet.
I have had Clamydia 2 times and no other STDs.
Both times condoms were worn for sex properly.
Once I got it from BBBJ with girl from the Grace Hotel Coffee shop.
2nd time got it in the left eye off my finger that had misbehaved with girls at J One MP most likely.