American Women

The irony is, Siesta has probably been played by some of those same American Women without even knowing it. They can be sneaky that way, you know?

I misunderstood him. He said he did not "leave [b]in[/b] the USA." I think he meant he did not "[b]live[/b] in the USA." So, he is not American and English is not his first language, most likely. So this means he has met the American women who are willing to travel and/or meet foreigners, which is not the majority.

Anyway Siesta, I apologize for misreading your post. American women still suck but that is not my problem any more.

You all may or may not agree with what this guy has to say, but don't beat him up for what he doesn't say. If I read his post correctly, he is talking about brits & aussies, not american women. There's plenty in what he does say to call him on. I think we should stick to that. For instance, if he's having sex only when his western gf is horny, he can't have very much experience. Who cares what he thinks.

This Siesta character has not been to the USA, from his wording English isn't a first language for him. Yet still, he doesn't have one clue about what life in the US is really like.

I wasn't bashing Siesta (if it seemed that way) but I DO think he was making a comment about something of which he has very little if any experience. I tried to bring that to his attention, and it may have seemed coarse. For that, I offer apologies. Many comments here are aimed at WESTERN women and their attitudes and I won't dispute much of that. My comments are aimed at AMERICAN WOMEN and come from experience as do the comments of many of you here. I feel that I was telling Siesta that he needs to pull back the curtain to expose the Great All-Powerful Oz what for what it is.

There is a good chance that these AW's that travel overseas do NOT travel in such a large pack like back home, and therefore the evidence of the sport of ego-crushing is minimal or nonexistent. Having not witnessed this despicable practice very much if at all, I feel, may have shaped his current opinion, which is different from the prevailing school of thought on this board.

"A western woman is different. They tend to be mere independent and do what they like. The relationship is more like a partnership. They would fuck you only if they feel horny, not just to please you. But there are advantages. You never have to pay for them, as they pay there way, be it a restaurant bill, or 50% of holiday expenses."

It's obvious that Siesta has no experience with American women. The statement above might be true of Swedish women for example but not American women by a long shot. It is true that AW will do whatever they want, but they have a serious problem with a man trying to do the same. The relationship is a partnership where the woman seeks to make 95% of the decisions. It's also true that they will only fuck you when they are horny or they want you to purchase them the latest "must have" item. As for never having to pay for them, that is a total fallacy. Some women may pay some portion of the expenses initially, however once they start putting out the pussy this comes to an abrupt end. The man is then expected to pay 100% of all expenses even though the woman only fucks him when she feels horny. You can be assured that she will feel horny less frequently as the relationship progresses.

With a Western woman you will still have to be the "breadwinner". If you don't pay up front you will pay on the way out. Just ask all the divorced men about the back loaded fund called marriage in the West.

While Western women can talk dirty and might even be mechanically proficient at sex, it is often sex without soul or true emotion.

Why settle for cold sex with a woman who only fucks you when she has nothing better to do? Latinas have hot pussy and whatever you spend on them is peanuts compared to the cost of having a Western girlfriend/wife.

I don't believe that dealing with Western women's bullshit is a "fair" trade-off for occasional mediocre sex. You may have to pay a Latina's way but that is only because she is a queen and deserves to be treated as such. In return for this you will be her king. She will suck you, fuck you, even cook and wash for you when you wish. It's good to be king!

i heard one of a kind of funny one regarding the women paying. i once read a rant online by a guy who felt a need to explain to his girlfriend with whom he was supposed to be sharing expenses equally that $20 was not half of anything except $40. when they went to aruba, and the whole deal went on his credit card, she gave him $20. he spent $160 taking her parents to a nice restaurant, and she gave him $20-you guys get the idea-"fair and equitable"

regarding siesta's post, what he is describing as appearently in his opinion less than optimal behavior in latinas and ee women, sounds like paradise to me. i personally will gladly foot the bill for a woman who is faithful, and makes her priority my well being-that is actually "fair and equitable", a concept that our lovely domestic models don't have a grasp on. have your cake and eat it too(until you get very fat) is more their speed

regarding the "bashing", yes, this forum may seem to be "over the top" at times, but basically it is one of the very few tiny voices raised against the din of the media, our culture, our education system, feminist academia, and our government and judiciary bodies.

waiting for an elevator in manhattan office building and out pops 2 women with luggage. one looks at me and smiling says hello in a friendly way with a european accent. i nod. her friend says to her "see the men here in ny don't say hello". actually i was speechless because they were both gorgeous and the american one was near 6ft tall and looked like a combination of naomi campbell and stacey dash with tight jeans plastered on.

to the guy who wants to know what life is like here in the us in regards to women-it sucks. you are constantly on guard with females when it comes to talking. one girl moaned "he always says the wrong things". it's like verbal chess. the in thing now for females is to brand the guy a stalker! and watch out you might be called a weirdo guy if you want to park in a less crowded section of the parking lot.

I was on vacation in Spain, and in this grocery store, the checkout lady working there was a gorgeous Spanish blonde with a honey complexion, yet some knucklehead next to me kept talking about Jennifer Aniston, this local didn't have a clue that a really nice piece of woman was only a few feet away from us. Jennifer A on her best day couldn't compare to this beauty.

Mike I know exactly what the fuck your talking about being on guard. If you are not their compleat package then addressing them is something your simply no allowed to do or you are a stalker. How many time i have heard my friends that are girls here ***** about two things
1. Too many LOSERS hitting on them.

2. Not meeting any GOOD guys.

Siesta, I have yet to meet the AW that paid their 50%, my experiance is that their 50% is telling me what we should do that I will pay for. Once I was leaving a movie with a girlfriend here and she said "next time I pick the movie" and was pissed when I told her I would be happy to go to any movie that SHE paid for. She hit the fucking roof, her responce "just because your paying for it doesn't mean you get to pick it." I told her that because I was paying for it was WHY I get to pick it.

I still pay for all the dates with my girl in BsAs, but when she has something she would like to do, she whispers it in my ear says please and lightly pinches my nipple or something. I'm all in for that kind of manipulation, but the bitches here just DEMAND it. My problem with AW has always been their idea of entitalment, as if I am expected to put up with anything just for the privalage of being around them.

I'm happy to pay for all the dinners and movies and trips if it means I'm the King of the castle and she is my Queen.

Well said, my bretheren! However, I feel that Siesta is rooted in his opinion, as are WE (at least experience taught US). He is on his way to what he thinks is a wonderful acquatic petting zoo, but is in actuality, open water littered with chum while he tries to pet the Great Whites he adores. If he needs to lose a limb in order to learn a lesson, I will be the LAST ONE to stand in his way...

I concur that Siesta probably has not been to the USA or at least not for long. That said, I have had several European friends that have visited the USA for a week or so and hit major cities like NY and Miami. Several scored with the locals and reportedly had great experiences. Nothing but praise for AW, or at least the ease of bagging some decent ones in bars. I once went out with one of these guys and the girls were on him like flies on shit, I couldnt believe it, this guy is decent-looking but not outstanding. Could it be that AW treat them differently or that they know something we dont about handling our women? I really dont/didnt think that the foreign=interesting concept applies to AW.

There is another site americanwomensuck.com, I heard the guy who runs it was getting bombarded with threats of all kinds because of it from AWs, he even has AW sympathizing homos threatening him. This Siesta dude is going to get bit in half by those AW sharks.

Thank you for posting your comments in this thread. I am a firm believer of open dialogue & I always welcome opposing viewpoints, so welcome aboard!

Siesta, American Women Suck. I know this first hand. I am originally from Chicago, I served in the Armed Forces & lived in Japan & England for a total of 5 years, I now live in SE Florida & I’m twice divorced (both American Women – one white & one black).

I would like to know where you are originally from, where you live now if different from your origin & how many British/Anglo women you have had relationships with (ballpark figure is good enough). I’m just trying to get an understanding of the basis of your opinion in order to better appreciate your viewpoint.

ILAS

American Women Suck – Siesta will learn this soon enough

I just took a look at the site and I LIKE IT! The caretaker of the site must have known that ball-less, feminazi-sympathizing gay men and their soul-sucking, wallet-draining, man-hating female co-conspirators would mount an effort to collect a bunch of pitchfork-carrying villagers to hound him. The dude has MY support 100%. He lays out his points pretty eloquently, and that is sure to [url=http://isgprohibitedwords.info?CodeWord=CodeWord140][CodeWord140][/url] off the shemons (whoops! I meant DEMONS)