Printable View
[QUOTE=Ezinho] Or maybe, our women in America are opening their legs for every guy that crosses the Atlantic?[/QUOTE]
Ezinho you might have a point with this statement. While I was studying in London many years ago it was pretty easy to pick up young AW, many of whom were backpacking through Europe during the summer.
[quote=John Pokes]I'd just like to point out that while we spend a lot of time complaining about North American women the guys in the countries we go to to get laid are fantasizing about our women.[/quote]
[QUOTE=Bango Cheito]I can GUARANTEE you no Colombian or Brazilian guy is fantasizing about American pussy, especially if they ever spent any time here. It's just so much easier to get laid PERIOD in those countries. Guys that aren't getting any there are not likely to make it to the US and if they get here they aren't getting anywhere near a decent-looking woman I can GUARANTEE you that![/QUOTE]
While Bango is partly correct regarding how women [i]look[/i], he is incorrect about the fantasizing. I have read accounts about Latin men, mostly in the Dominican Republic, looking to hook up with American women. The going joke was that Dominican men were into the 3 Bs, [b]b[/b]londe hair, big [b]b[/b]oobs, and a [b]b[/b]lue passport. Latin men chase AW for the same reason that many Latin women chase us, the opportunity to marry and move to the US!
Other Latin men who prefer to stay in their countries do the same thing that Latin women do; they string AWs along and persuade them to send money overseas. The men who do this are called [i]sankies[/i]. They chat up fat ugly AWs and tell them how beautiful they are but need money to help their sick mothers, etc. etc. and the AWs oblige.
There is a movie about how overseas men prefer 'rounder' women, called "Phat Girlz". Some overweight Black women who are dissed in the US go to Africa where they are worshipped.
Regarding recent posts about men not wanting to get married....
I'm 100% in agreement with this. The idea of a so-called marriage strike is absolute genius! Hit them were it hurts and deny them any chance whatsoever to get at you through legal means. Then you can negotiate terms from a position of strength.
No man in his right mind would (or should) ever consider marrying a western woman. If you must, find yourself a woman from some part of the world where marriage still means something. Treat her with a reasonable amount of respect and don't screw around on her (or at least keep it to a low-key minimum). You aren't anywhere near as likely to end up in some no-fault, feminazi legal nightmare.
I suppose another safe wayto get married would be to put it off until you can afford to expatriate and then get married in another country where the divorce laws aren't so insane.
Sometimes I think there are women out there who have their divorce plans made up before they even meet the victim... er, guy that they end up marrying. This makes me think of something I heard about Tom Cruise. There was a rumor that part of the reason he divorced Nicole Kidman was that he knew she'd be able to take him to the cleaners if they got divorced after being married for more than 10 years. So he struck first, and got rid of her before the "price" got too high. The guy might be a wacko, but he ain't stupid.
Rock
George, I wasn't talking about the sankies. I was talking about Latin men thinking gringas are ATTRACTIVE and FANTASIZING about them.
Rock Dog, don't forget one important point, especially since you're writing from Canada, in that country once you have been shacking up with a girl for 6 months, you are automatically married in many respects in the eyes of the law. I had a friend in Toronto who played house with some stripper for just over 6 months, next thing he knew AFTER he got signed by a major label and his band got a nice advance to record from the label this fucking biatch appears out of nowhere, sues him and WINS. She even got half his PAID OFF house! So keep your own distinct address and careful about letting them crash too much :P
BTW in Colombia and Brazil the laws are much the same as they are in Canada, but the length of time is longer (2 years).
Not marrying them won't help.
Women will just moan and groan until the laws get changed and you will have to split your assets after dating them for a year wether you live with or marry them or even if you don't.
Hell has no fury like a woman scorned.
A woman who is intent on getting hold of a mans assets will find a way or a gulliable man.
[QUOTE=Sasha Coffee]Not marrying them won't help.
Women will just moan and groan until the laws get changed and you will have to split your assets after dating them for a year wether you live with or marry them or even if you don't.
Hell has no fury like a woman scorned.
A woman who is intent on getting hold of a mans assets will find a way or a gulliable man.[/QUOTE]
That would be a very far stretch. If women were to try and get the laws to give them half of a man's assets simply because he dated them for a year it would be recognized for what it is, prostitution. Women are not entirely stupid either, they would realize that such a move would mean the end of a steady supply of free dinners and gifts. The law wouldn't get very far once men start refusing to take women out on dates and opting for one night stands as the relationship of choice. The only people fucking in the country with such a stupid law would be the lower classes. The wealthy men will travel abroad for sex and the rich girls will be relegated to fucking blue collar workers. The later is not such a bad idea. Anyway, the native born population would go into a serious decline along with society. Once civilizations start going to extremes their collapse follows rather quickly.
[QUOTE=Chocha Monger]That would be a very far stretch. If women were to try and get the laws to give them half of a man's assets simply because he dated them for a year it would be recognized for what it is, prostitution. Women are not entirely stupid either, they would realize that such a move would mean the end of a steady supply of free dinners and gifts. The law wouldn't get very far once men start refusing to take women out on dates and opting for one night stands as the relationship of choice. The only people fucking in the country with such a stupid law would be the lower classes. The wealthy men will travel abroad for sex and the rich girls will be relegated to fucking blue collar workers. The later is not such a bad idea. Anyway, the native born population would go into a serious decline along with society. Once civilizations start going to extremes their collapse follows rather quickly.[/QUOTE]Hi CM,
I think your post is very logical, however we are talking about emotional creatures and they almost always defy logic. IMHO a lot of what you say is already happening, lots of guys won’t date AW, and they travel abroad for sex. (I’m one of them.) oh and have you heard of "palimony"?
BTW because they’re emotion driven is exactly why I will [b][u]never[/b][/u] vote for a female for political office. Again that’s just MHO.
Punter 127
[QUOTE=Sasha Coffee]Not marrying them won't help.
Women will just moan and groan until the laws get changed and you will have to split your assets after dating them for a year wether you live with or marry them or even if you don't.
Hell has no fury like a woman scorned.
A woman who is intent on getting hold of a mans assets will find a way or a gulliable man.[/QUOTE]Hi SC,
You’re right on the money, that's exactly why they are cheaper by the hour!
Punter 127
[QUOTE=Chocha Monger] If women were to try and get the laws to give them half of a man's assets simply because he dated them for a year it would be recognized for what it is, prostitution. Women are not entirely stupid either [/QUOTE]The power of short term greed will trump long term common sense every time.
Besides, there is always a new crop of American men to lead to slaughter. They
will think that no one has ever been in love like them before.
I thought like that once, before I was burned.
Well twice, actually. I'm a slow learner...
DB
What CM described is already the norm.
Palimony lawsuits have been around 30 years.
A NY high court ruled that a guy who shacked up with his GF for a couple years and then they broke up, now he must pay her child support for kids who aren't even his.
With the hold that feminists have in UK and Sweden, I doubt things are all that different.
CM: isn't marrying for money already prostitution?
Proceed with caution out there, my brothers. These are angry dangerous hostile times for men.
DB:
You're right about short term greed. There will always be people who prefer slaughtering the golden goose for a meal rather than being content with a golden egg laid each day. Of course, all the golden geese tell themselves that they will never become the main course at dinner because they are much more valuable laying that golden egg each day. Then one day they find the housewife looking at them with a gleam in eye and axe in hand.
Yogin:
Yes. Marriage is a state sponsored form of prostitution. In the US it is the only legitimate version of this age old activity except for the State of Nevada which allows more straightforward manners of sexual commerce.
Sweden is in an even stronger feminist strangle hold than the US. The only difference is that some of the women there realize that they can't dominate men while expecting them to pay for everything because that would be slavery.
Lets face it.
The world is about to take a step back 150 years but the roles will be reversed it will be the men that end up not being able to work, vote or have any rights outside the home.
Rue the day men. The more women in politics the more likely it is to happen. Its well on the way already. Then watch the world disintergrate into the emotional prison of a womans hormones.
Stand tall and fight, burn your jockstraps. I wish you all good luck and long may the world have the sanity of males to keep our female hormones under control to some extent.
Men are already treated as second class citizens in the United States and it will continue until American men grow some balls and stand up for their rights. I have seen females in positions of power and most of them simply don’t handle it very well. Remember they only have the power we allow them to have; now they won’t like hearing that but the truth is we are still the stronger sex.
[QUOTE=Punter 127]Men are already treated as second class citizens in the United States and it will continue until American men grow some balls and stand up for their rights. I have seen females in positions of power and most of them simply don’t handle it very well. Remember they only have the power we allow them to have; now they won’t like hearing that but the truth is we are still the stronger sex.[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure about it...
Most of the women only take so called lower management jobs and done up bored work...Americans have plenty of freedom to pursue what they like...
Sergei Brin, Larry Page from Google rented their office in a garage which a women owned..
James Thomson..stem cell research guy has more than 50% of his research team as women..
In no where did the women intervene where men wanted to go..its just the two popular stories we know however, there are 1000's of venture funding in silicon valley started by Men and all doing well.
America is where most of the Alpha male strive and are born...the folks who come as immigrant in beta stage are transformed into Alpha status as soon as they come to America.
As far as making money and academic success are concerned....Its up to each man and women's own capability..
In relationship...the road is much harder in America...and it will get tougher for men everywhere....with women becoming more independent..
but if you have money and go around the world ..who cares...which government comes and goes..what policies they make to give women more right..
Money is a a great solvent man invented..its solves most of the problems
[QUOTE=Born Loser 5]I'm not sure about it...
..., there are 1000's of venture funding in silicon valley started by Men and all doing well.
America is where most of the Alpha male strive and are born...the folks who come as immigrant in beta stage are transformed into Alpha status as soon as they come to America.[/QUOTE]
There is a saying that necessity is the mother of invention. If that is true, why do you feel that men are starting so many new ventures in Silicon Valley? I believe that it is because the traditional corporate employer has become fearful of feminist lawsuits and is de facto hostile to men. The men who are capable, the Alpha males, have responded by leaving the corporation and starting their own ventures. It used to be that these men would invent WITHIN a corporation in its Research and Development Division and have its financial backing.
Immigrants who arrive as Betas and become Alphas do so out of necessity. There is no more room in the US for Beta males. They (we) have been displaced by women. I agree with Punter. Men in the US, especially Beta males, are second class citizens. Women and Alpha males are the first class citizens.