Perla Negra
https://vip-dubai-bunnies.com/all-dubai-escorts-uae/
The Velvet Room

Thread: Montreal

+ Add Report
Page 1 of 277 1 2 3 4 5 11 51 101 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 4143
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #4143
    Quote Originally Posted by Jalimon2  [View Original Post]
    I would not say confusion. I would say amplification If one is to write he gave 4 o's to the girl he is sure going to brag about getting DFK even if they barely kissed.
    Girls can fake an orgasm but not DFK.

    Many girls fake orgasms especially if the guy is inexperienced.

    Many guys confuse light sensual kissing with more passionate kissing. Me included.

    Most DFK is really LFK with a bit of tongue. These days I try to avoid those terms.

  2. #4142
    Quote Originally Posted by CloudSurf  [View Original Post]
    There is definitely confusion around the terms DFK and LFK.
    I would not say confusion. I would say amplification If one is to write he gave 4 o's to the girl he is sure going to brag about getting DFK even if they barely kissed.

    I have written a lot of review. Only my positive session I confess. But in those I never bragged about something I did not get.

    Quote Originally Posted by WyattEarp  [View Original Post]
    If the Montreal men are going to run around covering for average performance, these lackeys might get preferential treatment in the very short-run. Sooner or later, they're going to create an escort scene that resembles the Western provinces.
    See my reply above. The worst is there is no preferential treatment. I would know if there was. Those who get preferential treatment are the guys who spend a shitload on the girls. That's it.

    Cheers.

  3. #4141

    Report on Mandy from Vogue Montreal

    Second time I saw Mandy, last time was 2.5 years ago. I remembered her being amazing and so I tried to repeat and was lucky enough to get her.

    She doesn't work much these days and my sense is that she will continue to work less and less.

    She's a spinner, has such a cute face and is a totally sweetheart. So easy going, just wants everyone to be happy and have a good time. Very relaxed and casual, not a clock-watcher. Her hair color changes a lot but I got her as a blonde, which is what I like. She had extensions but I liked them, actually. She's a small package but with a lot of energy.

    She brought some lingerie per my request and kept it on throughout, which made me very happy. Lots of sensual kissing.

    BBBJ and when I asked if I could come in her mouth she said, "as you wish", with a smile. She just kept working it, swallowed and looked at me with another gorgeous smile.

    Cuddling and easy chatting in between, like we were old friends. I cannot stress how easy-going she is.

    Round 2 was great and then we chatted some more. I have her some extra as a tip and she was so grateful and acted like I didn't need to, but she definitely earned it!

    Body 9/10.

    Face 8/10.

    Service 9/10.

    I would definitely repeat if I could get her again. She mentioned that she likes threesomes so that would be my next attempt!

  4. #4140

    Report on Sasha Johansen

    Hey fellas,

    First time poster here. I've definitely looked over what people have posted and wanted to thank everyone for their reviews.

    Saw Sasha Johansen this past Monday at her incall location. Very easy to set up. She was amazing. So easy to talk to, very sexy, educated and gorgeous. We went over what I wanted to do and she had a lot of fun with it. Lots of long kissing, very sensual, great chemistry, great BBBJ, DATY, 69, and a variety of positions. The talking between rounds was great, very much a GFE experience, but a bit dirtier. Personally I'm more on the sensual side so this was great for me. I didn't ask about extras so I don't know what more she offers. I don't think the photos on her site do her justice. My opinions:

    Body 9/10.

    Face 9/10.

    Service 9/10.

    A little on the more expensive side but totally worth it for what I was looking for.

    Would definitely repeat.

  5. #4139
    Quote Originally Posted by WyattEarp  [View Original Post]
    I will use the example of tall, curvy beauty Valerie in Toronto. I think she came on the scene several months back. Reviews were very average if not downright weak. She made a course correction and men are noticing a big change in service.
    What kind of correction did she made? Can you elaborate on that? Does she provide passionate DFK? I checked out the Mirage website. It didn't say anything about GFE service. It only mentions companionship when I clicked on the Escorts under the service menu. It looks like one of those US Escort websites which are mostly ripped off. What's going on there in Toronto? These ladies offer in call only? It does not mention any specific acronym like DFK, Greek, CIM like those in many Montreal escort websites. Am I missing something here? I'm not familiar with the Toronto scene.

  6. #4138
    Quote Originally Posted by MtlLocal  [View Original Post]
    Discussion on the green seems like there is a decline of DFK among the agencies. Furthermore, I would say many reilviewers are claiming DFK as LFK for reasons unknown or simply confused on what True DFK is.
    There is definitely confusion around the terms DFK and LFK.

    One case illustrates this well. In Amanda's 12 page review thread on the local board multiple guys mention having had DFK with her, including 3 just in the first page.

    Yet Amanda states that she dislikes DFK and has never done it including with her boyfriends. Her definition of DFK is tongue thrusting and tonsil tickling. My definition is much less aggressive. Kissing for more than a few seconds with sensual and even passionate tongue touching. She admitted that she does participate in LFK if the guy smells clean and doesn't have bad breath.

    For me the definition are: no tongue = lite kissing.

    Long kisses with tongue caresses = passionate kissing.

    Tongue thrusting = I don't participate but if she has a 5" tongue I'the rather she put it to better use, like licking my balls while giving me a BJ.

  7. #4137
    Quote Originally Posted by WyattEarp  [View Original Post]
    If the Montreal men are going to run around covering for average performance, these lackeys might get preferential treatment in the very short-run. Sooner or later, they're going to create an escort scene that resembles the Western provinces.
    Haven't they been doing this for a while? I'm sure when a guy reads the reviews and doesn't get the same treatment or see the same 8/9 beauty they brush it off as you didn't have a "connection" or beauty is subjective BS on that board. There are a lot of ladies that are no better than a starfish in montreal. I've had better luck w / ladies that weren't constantly reviewed about on that board.

  8. #4136
    Quote Originally Posted by MtlLocal  [View Original Post]
    Discussion on the green seems like there is a decline of DFK among the agencies. Furthermore, I would say many reilviewers are claiming DFK as LFK for reasons unknown or simply confused on what True DFK is.
    Some men are simply fucking up the marketplace. Internet reviews were the great game changer twenty years ago. Offer mediocre service and word gets around fairly quickly.

    I will use the example of tall, curvy beauty Valerie in Toronto. I think she came on the scene several months back. Reviews were very average if not downright weak. She made a course correction and men are noticing a big change in service.

    http://mirage-entertainment.cc/escort/valerie/

    If the Montreal men are going to run around covering for average performance, these lackeys might get preferential treatment in the very short-run. Sooner or later, they're going to create an escort scene that resembles the Western provinces.

  9. #4135
    Discussion on the green seems like there is a decline of DFK among the agencies. Furthermore, I would say many reilviewers are claiming DFK as LFK for reasons unknown or simply confused on what True DFK is.

    Casey Euphoria Review.

    Looks: 8 Quebecoise cutie. Solid body.

    Attitude: 7.5 Nice lady. A bit laid back. Talked about things I didn't care about without prompting. If you've seen her you know. LOL.

    Service: 7.25 LFK. Initiated DFK twice. Dominant BLS. Decent BBJ. Don't think she digs too much eye contact during sex, though still pretty good.

    Repeat: No.

  10. #4134
    Quote Originally Posted by Mongerer88  [View Original Post]
    The reason Scarlett's twitter is not posted publicly is because it is under her webcam persona, and she travels to the USA Regularly as a webcam lady.

    USA Border patrol denies entry for a visitor into the USA When they have reasonable proof that a lady works as an escort in a foreign country. There is an actual law allowing them to do this, which is ridiculous.

    So it is important that her webcam persona (and associated webcam twitter) not be posted in conjunction with her escort persona. The local review board is careful about this, and we should be, also.

    If you were a senior member, someone would likely share it with you.

    She is a stunningly beautiful lady who delivers excellent performance.
    Thanks for chiming in. I felt a little jerky for being so guarded, but I'm glad you took the time to explain this. I did not know it, and I now feel better about my guardedness!

  11. #4133

    Order patron

    Quote Originally Posted by PogoHunter3222  [View Original Post]
    I've actually been trying to find out for awhile with no success, but what is Scarlett's Twitter?
    The reason Scarlett's twitter is not posted publicly is because it is under her webcam persona, and she travels to the USA Regularly as a webcam lady.

    USA Border patrol denies entry for a visitor into the USA When they have reasonable proof that a lady works as an escort in a foreign country. There is an actual law allowing them to do this, which is ridiculous.

    So it is important that her webcam persona (and associated webcam twitter) not be posted in conjunction with her escort persona. The local review board is careful about this, and we should be, also.

    If you were a senior member, someone would likely share it with you.

    She is a stunningly beautiful lady who delivers excellent performance.

  12. #4132
    Quote Originally Posted by PogoHunter3222  [View Original Post]
    I've actually been trying to find out for awhile with no success, but what is Scarlett's Twitter?
    Sorry man, you have three total posts. Two of them are questions. One is a thank you.

  13. #4131
    Quote Originally Posted by WyattEarp  [View Original Post]
    What is your take on Amanda's affection? Some recent comments have suggested that she's not a great kisser. Some LFK. Some seem to indicate her being cool with some clients.

    I shied away from her on a recent trip because someone else more intriguing was available.

    Don't get me wrong. There is something about a beauty with a great body that knows how to use it. She is also supposedly great with her mouth.
    I found her alright. She's a nice person, but all I got was very light LFK. Very light. I get DFK with almost everyone else. She was cool to start with because I am on the younger side, she thought one of her friends was playing a trick on her and had sent me to see her for some reason or another. Anyway, she was a bit paranoid about that for the first bit (which may explain the LFK. Don't know). I didn't find her BBBJ anything to write home about. It was good, but nothing unique or unusual. When I saw her she was not freshly shaen and had some stubble, which took away some DATY enjoyment. Though fair enough, you can't necessarily shave there every day.

  14. #4130
    Quote Originally Posted by StevenMazza  [View Original Post]
    All I can do is confirm everything has posted in the past. Beautiful girl. Perfect body tits and ass go well with her frame with a pretty face and DSLs to boot.
    What is your take on Amanda's affection? Some recent comments have suggested that she's not a great kisser. Some LFK. Some seem to indicate her being cool with some clients.

    I shied away from her on a recent trip because someone else more intriguing was available.

    Don't get me wrong. There is something about a beauty with a great body that knows how to use it. She is also supposedly great with her mouth.

  15. #4129

    Noemie at VelvetLove

    Been chasing this one for a while. Anytime I would be able to make it too Montreal she was booked or not working. This time it worked out. So here we go.

    Body 8/10.

    Face 7/10.

    Service 7.5/10.

    The body was beautiful, nice man made breast very little body fat, long nice legs, and and a nice ass that went along nicely. The reason I gave it a 8 is that it's not as tight as most girls (looks to be 30 y / o).

    Face: amazing lips, pretty but didn't like the fake eyebrows and she didn't look fresh and youthful. A more mature look.

    Service I can't complain BBBJ was very nice. DT, eye contact, full service was just fine. Only complaint was there wasn't much kissing. Very little LFK. CIM was extra so I decided to finish on her tits.

    Repeat. Never do.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape