Stupid shit in Medellin

[Surfer500]

We European always feel this US 15%-20% gratuity thing a real extortion every time we go to USA. If the bill for my table dinner is $500, why the heck should we give $100 to the waiter?? At the end of the night, the waiters collect a basic monthly salary. Every night. Hard to accept this.

In Europe, we leave 5 EUR to show our appreciation for the service. I remember once, when I wanted to leave 2 SGD on the table after my dinner in Singapore. The waitress run me back, calling me when I was already out of the restaurant, presenting me the 2 SGD note "Hey Mr you forgot this money!

I remember while in Japan it was considered an insult to even leave a tip. To bad there aren't more Countries like this in the World. I remember several years ago eating lunch with my boss in a diner. The service was horrific, and after we got the bill and the waitress came back with the change my boss left 2 cents on the table as the tip. Instead of leaving nothing as though it had been an oversight, it was a very stark way of saying the service sucked.

[MarquisdeSade1]

You probably also want to criticize me for never tipping. Please go ahead. And send me additional for all the tips I never leave. After all its only 3 dollars.

One of my best friends does this whenever we go out to eat in the states. I always leave "just" 15% and since he used to work in the service industry he feels its his moral obligation to make all the people he eats with pay the same percentage as he would which ends up between 20 to 25%. I hate to tell him that I fucking hate even leaving 15%. I'd rather leave nothing. So fucking raise the prices on me. Thats the best thing for everyone, lets agree on a deal a price and I will pay it and you will serve me my food.

The same thing goes with fucking chicas. Lets agree on a price and a taxi and I will pay the price. In this case she agreed on the price and I paid it. And she was happy when she left and I was happy with the session.

If you don't want to read my posts about how little I'm paying becuase you enjoy paying more, please feel free to block all my posts..

Touche' kazeu!

[Black Page]

I always leave "just" 15% and since he used to work in the service industry he feels its his moral obligation to make all the people he eats with pay the same percentage as he would which ends up between 20 to 25%. I hate to tell him that I fucking hate even leaving 15%. .

We European always feel this US 15%-20% gratuity thing a real extortion every time we go to USA. If the bill for my table dinner is $500, why the heck should we give $100 to the waiter?? At the end of the night, the waiters collect a basic monthly salary. Every night. Hard to accept this.

In Europe, we leave 5 EUR to show our appreciation for the service. I remember once, when I wanted to leave 2 SGD on the table after my dinner in Singapore. The waitress run me back, calling me when I was already out of the restaurant, presenting me the 2 SGD note "Hey Mr you forgot this money!

[Kazeu]

You really want to start another OMG you pay XXX vs I pay XXX discussion? Didn't we just get over one recently here?

You pay what you want. I will pay what I want. If you really don't care that much about 3 dollars vs 6 dollars, I got a venmo account for you to send me 6 dollars for all of my girls taxis.

You probably also want to criticize me for never tipping. Please go ahead. And send me additional for all the tips I never leave. After all its only 3 dollars.

One of my best friends does this whenever we go out to eat in the states. I always leave "just" 15% and since he used to work in the service industry he feels its his moral obligation to make all the people he eats with pay the same percentage as he would which ends up between 20 to 25%. I hate to tell him that I fucking hate even leaving 15%. I'd rather leave nothing. So fucking raise the prices on me. Thats the best thing for everyone, lets agree on a deal a price and I will pay it and you will serve me my food.

The same thing goes with fucking chicas. Lets agree on a price and a taxi and I will pay the price. In this case she agreed on the price and I paid it. And she was happy when she left and I was happy with the session.

If you don't want to read my posts about how little I'm paying becuase you enjoy paying more, please feel free to block all my posts.

I'm glad you get a good deal for 200 k, I was a newbie once and I paid 200 k before, but I haven't since. I don't come to this forum to learn how to pay more money for sex. I could just stay in the states to do that.

[Kazeu]

Really? You bust on this girl for trying to get roughly $6 instead of $3 for taxi? Better to pick your wars. If she's trying to con you into 600 K for a session when 200 K is a good day for her, that's one thing but come on man 3 bucks? Jajaj I have a favorite I sneak in, every other trip when my girl was in class. I would give her 20 K for the taxi and one day I followed her down stairs to give her a tube of VS lotion she forgot and I saw her running down the street to catch the bus. To her the 20 k was more valuable to her than the luxury of a taxi. I never said anything and I totally understand where she was coming from. She's a good kid, we have never even talked about how much or how long before or after, she just is happy with what I give her. Usually 200 + 20 for taxi. And she gives 100% every time I see her. My time with her is so hot she could probably get double from a lot of you guys because she's that good. I'll give her a gift from time to time but I don't change our price structure.

You really want to start another OMG you pay XXX vs I pay XXX discussion? Didn't we just get over one recently here?

You pay what you want. I will pay what I want. If you really don't care that much about 3 dollars vs 6 dollars, I got a venmo account for you to send me 6 dollars for all of my girls taxis.

[Mr Enternational]

Certain things are objectively better than others. A steak at Morton's is better than Denny's.

Totally agree. But when you pay a Wagyu A5 price for a Denny's steak and try to pass it off as a Morton's steak (or even worse, convince yourself into believing it) then that is just being plain disingenuous. The money you spent on it is not what makes it objectively better, but in your mind you have made it subjectively better and try to tout it as better when everybody else is like dude that is just a Denny's steak. Spending $10,000 on a coach seat does not make it a private jet.

[JjBee62]

On the issue of if money works to get you access to women, you have said it never does, maybe it does but I need proof, and Elvis, I never told you the money you spent did not attract beautiful women. So on the issue of if money helps with women, you have said yes, no, and maybe. The amazing thing with you JJBee is that you think that you are clever instead of being what Paulie is, a nonsensical blowhard.

I have never used Tinder.

My reports are honest: the good, the bad, and the ugly, and that is why they provoke envy in people with you. I am glad you admitted it.

As for the women with jobs I see being "high income", two are unemployed. One works as a teacher making $400 a month, and I think the one you are referring to as highly paid is the Mexican lawyer. You do not understand how little Mexican lawyers make. She was making $1000 a month and is down to $500 now in a post Corona world.

My saying I see high income women is like Tinder. You are refuting not what I say but what you want to be true. That is how delusional you are.

I just showed the photo of a woman I met who literally won a beauty contest, and you called her ordinary.

Then you called her a hooker.

And then after I had given her money over the last few months and been conversing with her on a weekly basis somehow you come up with the idea that I am a stranger.

The funny part is the first thing she had me do when she came to my hotel room was to help her sister with her studies over the phone.

What is so funny with you JJBee is you make this incredible wise and intelligent comment. I agree with everything you wrote.

But why would you be so fucking stupid to think a six month quarantine is not a verifiable emergency?

And the answer is because you are not thinking. You are so emotionally caught up in the subject of being master of the game, you cannot admit someone is better at it than you..

Again, seek medical attention. Your ability to read and understand simple sentences is seriously impaired.

You keep saying I said things, which I never said, you take things, which even a child could understand, and wildly misinterpret them, then you accuse me of altering what you say. Either there is some cerebral anomaly, perhaps a tumor, affecting your cognitive function, or you're a fucking idiot. Check with a neurologist and he can tell you whether there's a physiological cause or it's just stupidity.

One of my golden rules? How deep was your head in your colon when you plucked that nugget? My golden rules are:

1. Do what the fuck you want.

2. Don't tell others what to do.

3. Don't cause unnecessary harm.

4. Don't try to convert me to your religion or politics.

Nothing about money makes the list. As for money never buying you anything, it bought me lunch not long ago. If I had known you were so engrossed in fecal matter, I would have sent a picture of what that food looks like now.

For the final time, you get no guarantee when sending a stranger money. You say that sending money to a woman, who you declared the hotel clerk recognized as a hooker, convinced her to come see you. Okay. I understand that is a possibility. After all if your looks match your intelligence, it makes perfect sense why it takes 6 months of bribes to get a woman into the same room as you.

Every one of the posts you write, when the bullshit in your original posts is questioned is full of ridiculous hearsay, which is supposed to validate your original fantasy. This goes all the way back to your Venezuelan in Peru. It's as predictable as the tide.

But nothing you (or anyone else) put in your posts is proof of anything. Here's a simple illustration:

"While we were camping in the mountains of Idaho, my friend's wife called a girl she knew, trying to set me up with her. The girl came and we fucked. I fucked her so good she paid me for the sex. ".

How does anyone know anything in that story is true? What can I add which proves I've ever been to Idaho, or camped in the mountains? If I said the girl gave me $100 and I used it to take everyone to breakfast in town, does that prove anything? What If I said her first name was the feminine equivalent of my middle name? Maybe if I said she was a coke dealer and had a mole on her thigh? How about "she asked me to come live with her and offered to support me?

The simple fact is, I can't prove any of that. Even if I sat you down with my friend and his ex-wife, and they both repeated the story, it's not proof of anything.

The same is true of every one of your claims. You keep insisting things are true and things are facts, yet you provide nothing other than more empty words. Then you are deluded enough to say everyone knows you're telling the truth. Literally not one single person has stepped up and declared they know every word of your posts is true.

You claim your supermodel's accomplishments, yet anyone can pick the same things and make the same claims. If you had bothered to develop a reputation for honesty and integrity, there might be less disbelief, but that opportunity is buried under about 5 tons of blatant dishonesty.

You claim your "queen" won a beauty contest, therefore she can't be a hooker. Apparently you miss every story about former beauty contestants (in major pagaents) accused of prostitution. There's a former Miss America who became a porn star. I remember a stripper friend who won a tattoo contest at a biker rally (Laughlin River Run). That doesn't prove she had a tattoo (she didn't. She won with a temporary tattoo).

First, you can't prove "the queen" ever won a pagaent. Even if you could, that has nothing to do with whether or not she's a hooker. Talking to her for 6 months doesn't make you an intimate acquaintance. The first girl I met in Colombia, in Bogotá, a non-pro, I had talked to almost every day for more than a year. The first time we met it was at a Transmilenio station and she had someone watching over her from a distance. I even suggested she meet me at my hotel and she reacted as if I had suggested she walk down Carrera 15 naked.

Hookers have no qualms about coming to your hotel or going to your room. It's a necessary part of earning their pay. A hooker has no problem about meeting you for the first time and staying the night. Again, all part of getting paid.

The rest of your story is unconfirmed bullshit.

You are reaping what you sowed. Remember all your claims that AIDS never happened? I was just reminded of that recently. I'm rereading "Imajica" by Clive Barker, published in 1991, in the height of the AIDS epidemic in the US. AIDS gets a small mention in the story, yet he does an incredible job of describing the progress of the disease. Remember my post about my volunteer work, along with my wife, with the AIDS, Art, Alive group in San Diego, including a few searchable details and descriptions of a few of the afflicted artists? Do you recall?

Do you recall how you declared everything I wrote was untrue? Remember how you exaggerated what I wrote, trying to make me look like a liar? Is that jogging any memories?

When you call someone else's posts nothing but lies, even when a simple search in the archives of any newspaper will confirm many of the details, you have surrendered the right to demand everyone accept every word, no matter how unbelievable or contradictory, with no means to verify any part of the story, as the gospel.

By your past actions you have placed yourself in a position where every word you write will be scrutinized and challenged.

Which brings us to my parting shot.

On more than one occasion you've flexed your "don't take no shit from women, everyone else is living in fear" attitude. Yet, you let "the queen" tell you "no" for sex, hid the fact you were in Colombia from one, lied about having Covid to another, snuck into the other room to try and keep one girl from finding out about another one.

Put on your dog collar and gimp mask. Not only are you paying 11 women, who in one post you claimed all came to see you, but in another that changed to 7 women (and it's all true), but you're letting each one of them dictate your actions.

Instead of "cough, cough. I'm sick, I can't see you" (after months of paying her), someone with testicles would have either shelled out a few more dollars to get some return on the "investment", or told her "I've given you enough for a bus ticket. Get your ass here."

Instead of letting a woman, who's spending the night in your bed, put you off for sex, someone not living in fear would have told her "I'm fucking tonight. If you don't want to be involved you need to find someplace else to sleep."

Instead of hiding from the one woman, any self-respecting man would have told her he was busy with other things and he would see her on the agreed day.

For all your "me Tarzan" posturing, you're a rather pathetic little boy. You're terrified one girl will find out about another. You keep sending money because that's the only way to get them to like you. You hide and simper and try to convince each of them of your devotion.

Keep at it little fellow. If nothing else, the contradictions are hilarious.

[Elvis 2008]

As for the concept of a hooker, you really do not get it. I have had sex with the woman. There is no expectation of anything. I put money in her purse. She leaves and then I text her and write "If you check your purse, I gave you a gift. " Gifts without strings after sex are fine; paying for sex with these women is not. You guys have no game.

As for my SBs being working girls, you are hurting my feelings here, dude. Sarc. What is the deal with johns and their desire for normalcy and to be at one with institutions? We are all here because the institutions failed us.

The reason men see prostitutes is because it is cheaper financially and emotionally. I pay them to leave right?

Here you are doing the female version of shaming. Women have engaged in behaviors that have trapped men into accepting things against us as societal norms. Once you have sex with a woman, you have to be monogamous. Sorry, I reject that. Another is that women have the choice to abandon a child but men do not. I reject that one too. Deadbeat dad? Fuck that. If I ever had a kid born out of wedlock, supporting that child is MY choice!

Then there is the happily ever after concept. I reject that as well. No one cares if men live happily ever after. That is for women. We are supposed to make them happy.

There are three kinds of relationships: mutualistic where both parties benefit, commensal where one party benefits but not at the expense of the other, and the last is parasitic.

I see non stop blubbering about women being in parasitic relationships but men? It is almost as if those relationships do not exist. In fact, the female parasites have one thing in common. Whenever a woman is unhappy, even if it is her own fucking fault, she will claim to be the victim. Society almost dictates that everything wrong in a relationship is men are assholes. Time and again, I see productive men in bad relationships wanting out being reasonable and women being fucking crazy, and I know why. These women are used to being paid for being fucking crazy.

There are instances where men seeing working girls are being selfish pricks, but I see far too often men just desperate to be in any kind of mutualistic relationship. In my eyes, a guy seeing a working girl is more wholesome to both sexes than a woman sucking a man dry.

And for all this talk of female equality, 1% of female millionaires made their money on their own. 99% of the time it was women climbing on the back of men.

While you are ridiculously focusing on societal norms, JJBee, the sugar baby relationship allows for a long term relationship that goes deeper than just cash for sex. So in marriage, women do not care about male earning potential? Men do not care about looks and sexual performance? The whole notion then that a legitimate marriage is so much more worthy than a sugar relationship is poppycock. Marriage often is a horrible deal for a man with good earning potential.

The beauty of a sugar relationship is its honesty. It allows for emotional commitment, but if one side cannot perform, the relationship can be ended without the drama of a breakup nor attorneys with a divorce.

The real reason women are not working girls in most cases is the stigma and degradation. It is one thing to accept money as a gift from a guy you like and treats you well, and it is something far different to be paid and pretend to like a hundred different men, some of whom are disgusting. Also, while society may not be as accepting of a sugar relationship over marriage, it will tolerate it far more than prostitution, and that allows for a much larger pool of women.

From my point of view, it allows me access to some of the best women, to form fulfilling emotional bonds, and to be in a situation where I get the emotional perks and not be monogamous.

The irony with sugar relationships though just like with all of the other ones I have had is that with intimacy I tend to give more and the other party gives less and less. It is like, "I am fucking you. What else do you want?" Maybe it is because the best women have so many men at their beck and call they can get away with this lack of effort. It was surprising though to actually find one woman who says, "I am going to fuck you so good that you will never look at another woman" and backs it up. With this one, I have to tell her to stop giving me massages, to stop giving me a BJ.

These women know if they really needed me, I would be there for them, but when I say "Hey, baby, I need a blowjob. ", the resistance of some of the women is way higher than it should be, and why is that? Because society tells women any time they are not 100% in the mood for sex, being "forced" to perform is rape. Just like with monogamy though, this needs to be trained out of these women for THEIR benefit because I am not going to support someone who does not please me. This is why so often I have to have come to Jesus meetings but good luck doing that with a GF or wife.

In summary, like almost every other guy, you are focused on the wrong thing, the label. Prostitute, SB, GF, wife is far less important then if the relationship is mutually beneficial. What is so fucked up with men like you JJBee is you are more interested in pleasing society than yourself. That is why probably why you have been divorced so often.

As for money, the whole notion that a sugar relationship is more expensive, I am not going to refute that. It is to my advantage for men to think that. There are a limited number of the best women.

[Elvis 2008]

I never said that you sending money did not grant you any special access.

I said, as I've said before and will inevitably have to say again, "sending money doesn't buy you anything. "

How do you prove that sending money got you anything?

On the issue of if money works to get you access to women, you have said it never does, maybe it does but I need proof, and Elvis, I never told you the money you spent did not attract beautiful women. So on the issue of if money helps with women, you have said yes, no, and maybe. The amazing thing with you JJBee is that you think that you are clever instead of being what Paulie is, a nonsensical blowhard.

I have never used Tinder.

My reports are honest: the good, the bad, and the ugly, and that is why they provoke envy in people with you. I am glad you admitted it.

As for the women with jobs I see being "high income", two are unemployed. One works as a teacher making $400 a month, and I think the one you are referring to as highly paid is the Mexican lawyer. You do not understand how little Mexican lawyers make. She was making $1000 a month and is down to $500 now in a post Corona world.

My saying I see high income women is like Tinder. You are refuting not what I say but what you want to be true. That is how delusional you are.

I just showed the photo of a woman I met who literally won a beauty contest, and you called her ordinary.

Then you called her a hooker.

And then after I had given her money over the last few months and been conversing with her on a weekly basis somehow you come up with the idea that I am a stranger.

The funny part is the first thing she had me do when she came to my hotel room was to help her sister with her studies over the phone.

Over the years I've dated a lot of women, have been in several long term relationships and was even married 3 times.
If I had offered to pay the bills, tuition, car payment, rent, etc, for any of them, there would have been an argument and I would be lucky if they ever talked to me again. The only exception would have been a short term loan for some verifiable emergency.

What is so funny with you JJBee is you make this incredible wise and intelligent comment. I agree with everything you wrote.

But why would you be so fucking stupid to think a six month quarantine is not a verifiable emergency?

And the answer is because you are not thinking. You are so emotionally caught up in the subject of being master of the game, you cannot admit someone is better at it than you.

One of your golden rules, money doesn't buy you anything, has been questioned, and you may have to face up to being wrong which you hate.

I had no problems saying Kiara was a kind of hooker, so why resist with the Queen? Because she is not one.

My giving her money opened up the door to intimate conversation and after talking to her some, she said that she was in love with me.

And running out the door without getting a dime is totally the action of a woman in love and not a hooker.

You are just coming up with all this stupid shit because there is a part of you that knows what I have posted is true.

As for your seeing the truth, that is up to you not to me.

[Osteoknot]

Were just reported today. I wanted to point this out before someone else here made a misguided attempt at what this means. This changes nothing about everything I posted so far about prior infection conferring immunity. This bring the total worldwide number of confirmed cases of Covid reinfection to somewhere around two dozen, give or take. That's 24 cases of reinfection out of 48 million primary infections. Even if you are not a statistician, epidemiologist, or public health expert, those numbers should tell you there are better things to worry about than getting reinfected with Covid.

Call me when the number of reinfections goes over 100,000 and I will start to give it some attention. Remember, the exceptions prove the rule. Anyone who tells you otherwise, doesn't understand the science. This is not a static situation, I never said that myself and others like me who have recovered will be immune forever, although that is a possibility. But for now, we are. Look at outcomes, not processes, not theories. Ostee out.

[JjBee62]

Your using the word think Kafka is an oxymoron. You just recommended someone go to the Clock Tower to find women. I was just there. There are no women there.

Paulie said I did not understand present value because you could find a woman as hot as Kiera at a strip club. The strip clubs are closed.

JJBee said my paying money did not grant me any special access. 100% of the women I paid and asked to show up eventually did so. According to this math genius, 100% is not good enough.

And my personal favorite is Mr. E chastising me over the use of the word super model because words means stuff. He looks up the wiki page and leaves off this part, "Supermodels have multimillion-dollar contracts. " he got me on that one. I didn't see a model earning seven figures. Thanks for clearing that up Mr. E. I think that there was a lot of confusion about that.

I am just paraphrasing the inaccurate and incredibly stupid things the four of you said. I am glad that I have united you all in the "we are not stupid, Elvis" club.

I am going to have so much fun with this from now on.

Seriously. Go see a doctor. There is an obvious neurological problem you need to have checked out.

I never said that you sending money did not grant you any special access. Where the fuck do you get this shit?

I said, as I've said before and will inevitably have to say again, "sending money doesn't buy you anything. " No matter how much or how often you send money to hookers (I'll explain that concept shortly) there is no guarantee you will gain anything. You've already confirmed, in your own reports, the truth of my statement.

However, let's indulge your hallucination for a moment and assume I said "sending them money didn't grant you any special access. " Prove definitively that had you sent nothing at all, and merely carried on a conversation for the past 6 months, that the women would not have shown up and did all the same things.

How do you prove that sending money got you anything? That's a serious question. With the help of a couple of friends I can demonstrate the benefits of tipping in a restaurant or bar. I can show there's a different reaction from the same waitresses depending on the behavior of a regular customer.

With those same friends I can demonstrate both the benefits and problems with sending money to different girls. But there's simply no way to back up your claim that sending money granted you special access.

Now to explain the concept of "hooker."

Over the years I've dated a lot of women, have been in several long term relationships and was even married 3 times. I am quite comfortable in declaring that, if after the first time I had sex with any of those women, if I had stuck some money in their purse, it not only would have been the last date, with some of them, I'd have ended up bloody and my local reputation would have been in the shitter.

If I had offered to pay the bills, tuition, car payment, rent, etc, for any of them, there would have been an argument and I would be lucky if they ever talked to me again. The only exception would have been a short term loan for some verifiable emergency.

There's a simple reason. None of them were hookers. While several were happy to move in and let me pay the bills, not one (okay there was one) would have let anyone pay them for sex.

Maybe the SD-SB thing is a different style of prostitution, but it's still prostitution. If you had to send money to a woman for 4-6 months, at a rate of hundreds of dollars per month, just to spend a few days fucking her, for which, at least in some cases, you paid more, and the going rate for a 24 stay is $100, then you're dealing with hookers, that make the Gusto prices look like El Centro street girl prices.

As I've always said, I don't care how much you pay, or send, or buy. It's your money. However, when you try to pass all this off as some sort of special access to some special class of girls, you're peddling Bullshit and calling it caviar.

Your description of how the girls were dressed when they showed up at your hotel puts the lie to your words (as does your story about the airport taxistas behavior). I lived in Colombia for a year, mostly sharing an apartment with the type of girl you claim all these girls are. No middle to upper class Colombian is going to show up at a strange gringo's hotel dressed like a hooker. You would have a helluva time finding one who would meet you at the hotel, other than to wait in the lobby for you to come down. She certainly isn't going straight to your room and fucking you.

Hookers? No problem. I always had to tell the hookers how to dress when they came to one of the apartments. They'll happily (often cluelessly) show up at your hotel dressed like a hooker. They'll happily go to your room and happily take your money, because that's what hookers do.

Now back to Kafka's post. He has a legitimate thought. He's certainly not the first to question how much of your posts are fantasy.

After all, the day after I posted that I was talking with 4 non-pros, one which I called "the model" because I feel she's one of the most beautiful women I've ever seen (and because she said she wants to be a model) and another who is a cheerleader (which really isn't exceptional. Cheer competition is big in Colombia), you posted that you were talking with a supermodel and a Miss Colombia contestant.

Not that models are hard to come by in Colombia. I've got at least a dozen either in Instagram, Facebook or my Whatsapp. Several of them are quite well known to the Medellin mongers.

However, your reports don't match the claims. Finding pictures of models and beauty contest contestants is easy. Anyone here can find and post the kind of pictures you've posted. I'm waiting for someone to post the same pictures, because we both know none of the photos were taken by you, or in your presence.

Now when someone like PN or Slapshot posts photos, you know who took the picture. You know the photo can't be found on SA or some other site. The same is true with almost everyone else who posts photos. One guy only posts money shots, one only posts ass pics. One guy always includes a pic of the girl flipping him off.

Only one of your pics looks like the sort of pic a hooker would send to a potential customer (none look like the pic a non-pro would send to a guy she's interested in). Of course that's of "the queen. ".

Everything about your description of your meeting with "the queen" screams "hooker. " Even the desk clerk recognized her as a hooker. She was dressed like a hooker. She went straight to your room and fucked like a hooker. Now you can call her what you want and claim she's unavailable, but we both know that she's ready to jump into bed with anyone who will pay the price.

Oh that's right, she left before you paid her anything (other than the 6 months of payments you already said you sent. Most of the guys here understand this concept. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I doubt you have many believers that the hooker stormed out without her pay.

So show us some of that extraordinary evidence. Then instead of everyone questioning whether or not you're full of shit, everyone can ooh and ahh over how incredible you are.

Assuming I manage to score with any of the (alleged) non-pros during my visit, I'll be providing something to lend credence to my claims (because I would never ask someone to do something I won't, other than my proctologist).

[Sky Ryder]

Let me guess. Had I said something adverse to the conservative ideology it would not have been silly at all and you would not have said there was BS to follow? Well let me inform you that I am not a member of any political party and I will be voting for Republicans and Democrats alike in the upcoming elections in my country. I reserve the right to praise and criticize each party equally. As far as my beliefs, there should not even be parties. Each person should have to run on their own ideas and merits, not those of a collective they signed up for.

Actually I owe you and the board a huge apology for allowing "yanqui" politics to ooze like the slime it is onto this board of all places. I will say that I would agree with your second sentence, however your supposition in the first one above missed the mark by a very wide margin. I am reminded about the story of collecting red and black ants and putting them in a jar. There is not a problem until someone starts shaking the jar and all hell breaks loose. They go after each other until all are dead, and not one the the ants had done a thing to start the fight. A force completely removed was the cause. My feeling about life in the USA these days is we are all "ants" and some outside force is the causal reason for the polarity currently being displayed. I will now revert to the issue at hand. How to best find pleasure in the bosoms of attractive ladies from the world over.

[Mr Enternational]

I was with you right up until you decided to contradict yourself and posted something silly. Anytime I see or hear someone say, " I am not _ BUT" I know some BS is about to follow. I will just about guarantee you that for every "liberal shit" that fits your definition, I can find an equal version of some "conservative shit" to fit your narrative. This is one of those times, with "shit" is truly apolitical.

Well that is a dumb presupposition. If I say I am not much into skinny girls, but the way her ass was poking out I just had to have her or I am not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I did manage to squeak my way through school earning a doctorate, you would have known BS was to follow because I said I am not and but? Where are the contradictions in the above statements?

Let me guess. Had I said something adverse to the conservative ideology it would not have been silly at all and you would not have said there was BS to follow? Well let me inform you that I am not a member of any political party and I will be voting for Republicans and Democrats alike in the upcoming elections in my country. I reserve the right to praise and criticize each party equally. As far as my beliefs, there should not even be parties. Each person should have to run on their own ideas and merits, not those of a collective they signed up for.

[Elvis 2008]

I am starting to think Elvis just has a good imagination.

Your using the word think Kafka is an oxymoron. You just recommended someone go to the Clock Tower to find women. I was just there. There are no women there.

Paulie said I did not understand present value because you could find a woman as hot as Kiera at a strip club. The strip clubs are closed.

JJBee said my paying money did not grant me any special access. 100% of the women I paid and asked to show up eventually did so. According to this math genius, 100% is not good enough.

And my personal favorite is Mr. E chastising me over the use of the word super model because words means stuff. He looks up the wiki page and leaves off this part, "Supermodels have multimillion-dollar contracts. " he got me on that one. I didn't see a model earning seven figures. Thanks for clearing that up Mr. E. I think that there was a lot of confusion about that.

I am just paraphrasing the inaccurate and incredibly stupid things the four of you said. I am glad that I have united you all in the "we are not stupid, Elvis" club.

I am going to have so much fun with this from now on.

[Combo]

This really is stupid shit.