Thread: Medellin Reports
+
Add Report
Results 25,666 to 25,680 of 69311
-
01-26-21 20:50 #43646
Posts: 590I wish these girls understood how sex that clean body is to some guys. That is why I dabble in non-pros. More likely to find someone without tats (or maybe a small one). Unless you are rooting around in the ghetto.
Originally Posted by Osteoknot [View Original Post]
-
01-26-21 20:33 #43645
Posts: 930Policy change?
Originally Posted by JohnnyO [View Original Post]
-
01-26-21 20:27 #43644
Posts: 591100%. With you. Good intentions. The same thing happened with HIV the intentionally scared heterosexuals when the virus was only affecting j drug abusers and gays in the United States.
Those of us who are mongering before and after are well aware of the effects of what happened and it was all made up. And intentionally so.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
-
01-26-21 20:18 #43643
Posts: 1038Blakman internation
Here's a kingston, Jamaica treat. Cost me $10 fake perfume and $7 one piece. From 7 pm to 7 am. Would have stayed longer. All natural 20 year old non pro. Can you find cheaper than Colombia. Hell yeah. Definitely find better bodies.
Gusto king cheers and out. For you tall man.
-
01-26-21 19:49 #43642
Posts: 3802Originally Posted by JohnnyO [View Original Post]
-
01-26-21 19:35 #43641
Posts: 3296Elvis, you need to relax, not everyone is against you.
Originally Posted by Elvis2008 [View Original Post]
-
01-26-21 19:11 #43640
Posts: 261Quick Updates
I'm loving it so much that I extended my stay here. I do have a lot of things to write about but I'm just going to add cliff notes now and go into more details later.
I now have around 2 non working girls which are easy to find around here. By non working I mean I don't discuss price or how long they will stay. The main one stays 2-3 days cooks cleans and fucks like a champion. No matter how long she stays she gets fed, watered, stuff bought for her kid and a $100,000 COP, no more no less. She's either happy with it or isn't but she likes visiting.
I could have more of these arrangements but San Peter is hampering my efforts as it's almost impossible for me to get girls past the gatekeeper, so much so I've moved out yesterday. On my next post I'll go into detail on this.
3 of us went to Centro one night as we usually did, one got seperated from us and got stabbed and mugged by 4 guys, not badly injured but traumatised and he went home. I was in centro alone last night. Walked from Avenida to Barra, I survived but I wouldn't go near botero alone.
Barra E, I don't get it. Cold atmosphere boring girls. Beer twice the price of other places.
Another amazing session in Avenida only 65 k plus 10 k propina, watching porn, naked girls on stage and another girl with her hand in my boxers, is that even allowed there?
Gave eros another chance, my god, 4 girls that looked absolutely miserable, like someone killed their whole families. I wanted to leave right away but thought it might get messy with my lack of Spanish. They were barking orders at me which I didn't understand. Took the best one there, terrible rushed mechanical session. I'll never go there again, not when you have new life and Zandaly.
I have a go to girl at Zandaly, wow she goes above and beyond, last time I extended my session there.
Can someone recommend any other casas apart from Energy?
-
01-26-21 18:59 #43639
Posts: 17497Originally Posted by Nounce [View Original Post]
-
01-26-21 18:52 #43638
Posts: 1214Originally Posted by Yhoopeyk [View Original Post]
-
01-26-21 18:38 #43637
Posts: 221Originally Posted by FlcnHvy [View Original Post]
-
01-26-21 17:55 #43636
Posts: 42Hotel charge per girl
Hello,
Traveling tomorrow to Medellin. I'm wondering if anyone has current info for how much they charge per guest at Charlee hotel?
-
01-26-21 17:50 #43635
Posts: 4292Originally Posted by Nounce [View Original Post]
NYTimes again.
The costs of negativity.
Why are many experts conveying a more negative message?
Again, their motivations are mostly good. As academic researchers, they are instinctively cautious, prone to emphasizing any uncertainty. Many may also be nervous that vaccinated people will stop wearing masks and social distancing, which in turn could cause unvaccinated people to stop as well. If that happens, deaths would soar even higher.
End of quote.
Nounce, do you get that the public health officials have been lying? The thing that this article says is it is "mostly good" is bullshit! They are downplaying the vaccine because if people knew how good it was there would be a mad rush to get it, and there would be even more outrage in the government. On top of that, all these fucking pols hold up vaccine delivery so they can take pictures of themselves giving out the vaccine. There have been some great vaccine photo ops.
The NYT elevated these officials, these lying "scientists" as a means to discredit our former president. Once he was out of office, THEN the NYT started to tell the truth.
People like Fauci almost always fear monger as it is a way to get their attention and to increase their budgets.
Here is the latest idiocy from Fauci.
Could wearing two face masks at once during the pandemic provide more protection than just wearing one? According to White House advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci, "it likely does," he told NBC News' today on Monday.
Before it was no masks are needed and now it is two. What is tomorrow? Three?
-
01-26-21 17:40 #43634
Posts: 3802Originally Posted by LivingFossil [View Original Post]
I don't know how to more politely say to read the forum, and am surprised how magnimous another member was in providing you with a wealth of information to someone who had yet to take the time to read the forum.
-
01-26-21 17:32 #43633
Posts: 3296Originally Posted by LivingFossil [View Original Post]
-
01-26-21 17:26 #43632
Posts: 4292Originally Posted by Nounce [View Original Post]
Now a version of the mask story is repeating itself this time involving the vaccines. Once again, the experts don't seem to trust the public to hear the full truth.
This issue is important and complex enough that I'm going to make today's newsletter a bit longer than usual. [Email address deleted by Admin]
'Ridiculously encouraging'.
Right now, public discussion of the vaccines is full of warnings about their limitations: They're not 100 percent effective. Even vaccinated people may be able to spread the virus. And people shouldn't change their behavior once they get their shots.
These warnings have a basis in truth, just as it's true that masks are imperfect. But the sum total of the warnings is misleading, as I heard from multiple doctors and epidemiologists last week.
"It's driving me a little bit crazy," Dr. Ashish Jha, dean of the Brown School of Public Health, told me.
"We're underselling the vaccine," Dr. Aaron Richterman, an infectious-disease specialist at the University of Pennsylvania, said.
"It's going to save your life that's where the emphasis has to be right now," Dr. Peter Hotez of the Baylor College of Medicine said.
The Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are "essentially 100 percent effective against serious disease," Dr. Paul Offit, the director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, said. "It's ridiculously encouraging. ".
The details.
Here's my best attempt at summarizing what we know:
The Moderna and Pfizer vaccines the only two approved in the USA are among the best vaccines ever created, with effectiveness rates of about 95 percent after two doses. That's on par with the vaccines for chickenpox and measles. And a vaccine doesn't even need to be so effective to reduce cases sharply and crush a pandemic.
If anything, the 95 percent number understates the effectiveness, because it counts anyone who came down with a mild case of Covid-19 as a failure. But turning Covid into a typical flu as the vaccines evidently did for most of the remaining 5 percent is actually a success. Of the 32,000 people who received the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine in a research trial, do you want to guess how many contracted a severe Covid case? One.
Although no rigorous study has yet analyzed whether vaccinated people can spread the virus, it would be surprising if they did. "If there is an example of a vaccine in widespread clinical use that has this selective effect prevents disease but not infection I can't think of one!" Dr. Paul Sax of Harvard has written in The New England Journal of Medicine. (And, no, exclamation points are not common in medical journals.) On Twitter, Dr. Monica Gandhi of the University of California, San Francisco, argued: "Please be assured that YOU are safe after vaccine from what matters disease and spreading. "