Medellin Reports

[Mr Enternational]

You will get different numbers after you divide the price by the number of minutes.

Exactly the same thing that came to my mind when I read his statement. 30K will only get you 15 or 20 minutes with the downtown chick, whereas 250K or whatever will get you an hour or 2 with the Lleras chick. But if a guy has any sense he can tweak the system and do what PN does by offering the downtown chick double or triple the 30K and she will stay with him until the cows come home. But the Lleras chick will be bolting out of there when that hour or 2 is up, if she is not trying to do a runner as soon as you bust.

[Zeos1]

Hello,

Traveling tomorrow to Medellin. I'm wondering if anyone has current info for how much they charge per guest at Charlee hotel?

At the Charlee. Good luck with that.

[SpiderRider]

I'll be arriving and I think I'll be choosing an airbnb near centro with no doorman (the building / apartment looks nice). My concern here is, if I bring girls over I have never met, how risky is it to get drugged?

In that scenario? Substantial risk. Especially if you're using dating apps to meet them. Allowing them time to make a plan to exploit your foolishness.

[Yhoopeyk]

Hello,

Traveling tomorrow to Medellin. I'm wondering if anyone has current info for how much they charge per guest at Charlee hotel?

[Elvis 2008]

As I understand it, vaccine does not mean one will not get infected. I think a vaccinated person will be similar to asymptomatic case. , then for some people vaccine does not work well.

I have never heard of an asymptomatic case of the cold before, and Corona is a cold virus. In fact, given that Corona causes blood clots so often, you can have literally any symptom with it. A person who tests positive for Corona and is without symptoms has a false positive test. One of the leaders of the WHO said pretty much there is no asymptomatic cases of Corona and got her head bit off and retracted the statement the following day. Asymptomatic Corona scares people, and scared people are willing to give more funding to health care agencies.

NYTimes again.

The costs of negativity.

Why are many experts conveying a more negative message?

Again, their motivations are mostly good. As academic researchers, they are instinctively cautious, prone to emphasizing any uncertainty. Many may also be nervous that vaccinated people will stop wearing masks and social distancing, which in turn could cause unvaccinated people to stop as well. If that happens, deaths would soar even higher.

End of quote.

Nounce, do you get that the public health officials have been lying? The thing that this article says is it is "mostly good" is bullshit! They are downplaying the vaccine because if people knew how good it was there would be a mad rush to get it, and there would be even more outrage in the government. On top of that, all these fucking pols hold up vaccine delivery so they can take pictures of themselves giving out the vaccine. There have been some great vaccine photo ops.

The NYT elevated these officials, these lying "scientists" as a means to discredit our former president. Once he was out of office, THEN the NYT started to tell the truth.

People like Fauci almost always fear monger as it is a way to get their attention and to increase their budgets.

Here is the latest idiocy from Fauci.

Could wearing two face masks at once during the pandemic provide more protection than just wearing one? According to White House advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci, "it likely does," he told NBC News' today on Monday.

Before it was no masks are needed and now it is two. What is tomorrow? Three?

[Surfer500]

I meant that the PCR testing to get in to Colombia is easy to get done and the new quarantine rules for when you are back in the USA are not enforceable, the hardest part will be getting a COVID test when I fly out of Cartagena but I will have a week do and have read its not hard. I will not be breaking any laws in Colombia!

I googled Premium Plaza hotel and could get any info. Does anyone know the price and and it is nice and clean enough that anyone would might consider sleeping there overnight or is it an hourly type place? I assume its girl friendly.

Seems like centro is cheaper and more fun. I like grimy places hehe, but Lleras maybe has girls that "appear hotter". 30 K verus 250 K. These girls can't be eight times hotter.

Do a search on this thread for Premium Plaza, and the information your looking for regarding the Hotel will be found. Also, if you go back and read the previous reports there is lots of information regarding the Centro and LLeras venues.

I don't know how to more politely say to read the forum, and am surprised how magnimous another member was in providing you with a wealth of information to someone who had yet to take the time to read the forum.

[Nounce]

Seems like centro is cheaper and more fun. I like grimy places hehe, but Lleras maybe has girls that "appear hotter". 30 K verus 250 K. These girls can't be eight times hotter.

You will get different numbers after you divide the price by the number of minutes.

[Elvis 2008]

As I understand it, vaccine does not mean one will not get infected. I think a vaccinated person will be similar to asymptomatic case. , then for some people vaccine does not work well.

No, this is the moronic public health officials downplaying the vaccine. It is 95% per the studies that you will not get infected and if you do, it will be a mild case. Nounce, this is from your paper, the NYTimes:

Now a version of the mask story is repeating itself — this time involving the vaccines. Once again, the experts don't seem to trust the public to hear the full truth.

This issue is important and complex enough that I'm going to make today's newsletter a bit longer than usual. [Email address deleted by Admin]

'Ridiculously encouraging'.

Right now, public discussion of the vaccines is full of warnings about their limitations: They're not 100 percent effective. Even vaccinated people may be able to spread the virus. And people shouldn't change their behavior once they get their shots.

These warnings have a basis in truth, just as it's true that masks are imperfect. But the sum total of the warnings is misleading, as I heard from multiple doctors and epidemiologists last week.

"It's driving me a little bit crazy," Dr. Ashish Jha, dean of the Brown School of Public Health, told me.

"We're underselling the vaccine," Dr. Aaron Richterman, an infectious-disease specialist at the University of Pennsylvania, said.

"It's going to save your life — that's where the emphasis has to be right now," Dr. Peter Hotez of the Baylor College of Medicine said.

The Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are "essentially 100 percent effective against serious disease," Dr. Paul Offit, the director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, said. "It's ridiculously encouraging. ".

The details.

Here's my best attempt at summarizing what we know:

The Moderna and Pfizer vaccines — the only two approved in the USA — are among the best vaccines ever created, with effectiveness rates of about 95 percent after two doses. That's on par with the vaccines for chickenpox and measles. And a vaccine doesn't even need to be so effective to reduce cases sharply and crush a pandemic.

If anything, the 95 percent number understates the effectiveness, because it counts anyone who came down with a mild case of Covid-19 as a failure. But turning Covid into a typical flu — as the vaccines evidently did for most of the remaining 5 percent — is actually a success. Of the 32,000 people who received the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine in a research trial, do you want to guess how many contracted a severe Covid case? One.

Although no rigorous study has yet analyzed whether vaccinated people can spread the virus, it would be surprising if they did. "If there is an example of a vaccine in widespread clinical use that has this selective effect — prevents disease but not infection — I can't think of one!" Dr. Paul Sax of Harvard has written in The New England Journal of Medicine. (And, no, exclamation points are not common in medical journals.) On Twitter, Dr. Monica Gandhi of the University of California, San Francisco, argued: "Please be assured that YOU are safe after vaccine from what matters — disease and spreading. "

[Surfer500]

Even if they don't accept that it's good to have it. Both of vaccine and the car the card..... For the cim you can show the card.

Hehehehehe

So your saying that if you show a Chica your vaccination card you can Come in Her Mouth.

I'll be carrying my card with me wherever I go as I guess it's like a permission slip, and maybe the back of the card should also say it's okay to swallow.

[Just Incognito]

I guess this is going to be one of those questions that will be asked repeatedly. US does not allow it. It will be strange if Colombia allows it when they don't even have the vaccine for their own people.

As I understand it, vaccine does not mean one will not get infected. I think a vaccinated person will be similar to asymptomatic case. , then for some people vaccine does not work well.

Even with the vaccine you will need proof of PCR test and in some cases, the antigen test.

This isn't that complicated: The vaccine means if you get the virus, it most probably won't mae you sick at all-more than likely, you will be asymptomatic. . but it doesn't mean you can't carry the virus and spread it. So, until enough people are vaccinated and isolated to stop the spread and burn out the virus, people will need to continue to mask up abd be tested for travel in order to stop spreading the virus. Not spreading the virus also helps limit viral mutations.

The PCR test is more accurate in a way, but it only reads if you had enough viral load I your system to show on the test -you can be infected up to 72 hours prior to the pcr test and still show negative--even though you would soon afterward test positive. This leaves a 6 day gap in testing results to travel time: 3 days before your tet and the 72 hours from test priot to flight.

In order to account for these 6 days a little bit, the antigen test exists. Its a rapid test with results in minutes. Generally not as accurate as pcr testing-but the trade is the results are more recent to the travel. Ideally, a rapid tet just prior to flying, 3 days quarantine upon arrival and another test to be free of quarantine to account for infection during travel would be the norm around the planet.

[Surfer500]

I guess this is going to be one of those questions that will be asked repeatedly. US does not allow it. It will be strange if Colombia allows it when they don't even have the vaccine for their own people.

As I understand it, vaccine does not mean one will not get infected. I think a vaccinated person will be similar to asymptomatic case. , then for some people vaccine does not work well.

The groundwork for a vaccine passport system is well underway and is being assessed in the USA in terms of an international certification of vaccination that could be recognized by other nations requiring the shots. It would be similar to the yellow fever certificate, but instead of a yellow booklet, something digital. However at this point little is known whether vaccinated people can be carriers and infect others, albeit have no symptoms as you mention. Regardless, ahead of more scientific data, some Countries are now opening up their borders to those who can prove they have been vaccinated, and some cruise lines are requiring passengers to be vaccinated.

Perhaps Colombia if it instigates a quarantine in the future, will allow those who have been vaccinated not to be quarantined, however how they would verify this is unknown for the time being as any one could fabricate the vaccination cards being issued in the USA. I know that besides the cards being issued, some of those who have been vaccinated will have a digital record of the vaccinations they received. In Southern California they are using an APP in one of the Counties that has complete information about those who have been vaccinated, including the Lot #, date, time, the vaccinator. My guess is some type of registry may be established to verify someone's status as to whether they have been vaccinated, no different than proving your a resident somewhere. So in this case it might be someone submitting a form of ID, the card they were issued at the vaccination Site, and then somebody (Government) verifying thru the APP that was used by the vaccinating agency / County that this person showed up and received the shots / lots / vaccine shown on the card.

[Osteoknot]

If the system works, have you ever considered it may work even better to keep number one spot vacant?

I just got finished WhassApping La Gacella (before I read your post) who had a lock on Number Two and explained to her that there will not be any Number One for now. That is my plan. Would be natural for her to assume that she would slide into the Number One position, but she was surprisingly accepting of the situation.

Life just keeps getting better in Medellin. I blocked Cat Girl.

Thank you for being the First to suggest that there could be value to the system instead of reflexively discounting it. I am used to skepticism as I made a career if being an "out of the box" thinker, often with better results. I might be the only human in the universe for which the system is suitable, I am not trying to sell it to anyone or say it's a better way. This is not a contest. I can trash it tomorrow or lean on it another five years. One day at a time.

[Kafka]

Even if they don't accept that it's good to have it. Both of vaccine and the car the card..... For the cim you can show the card.

Hehehehehe

I guess this is going to be one of those questions that will be asked repeatedly. US does not allow it. It will be strange if Colombia allows it when they don't even have the vaccine for their own people.

As I understand it, vaccine does not mean one will not get infected. I think a vaccinated person will be similar to asymptomatic case. , then for some people vaccine does not work well.

[FlcnHvy]

These drugging networks are pretty sophisticated and run by criminal gangs. They go where the fish are biting, which can include El Pablado and lower level middle class areas. They especially want to find people carrying credit cards so they can run up charges or hit ATMs. There's plenty of articles around about this.

You're wrong about this one, but that's okay. We all are wrong sometimes, is how we learn. Wink.

I don't know if there is a 'wrong' or 'right'. But from the research I've done over the last two days, it seems that yes, organized groups are targeting 'better' areas localized with more tourists. Although that doesn't make me feel the 'bad' areas are safer. Obviously the best method is to perfectly not let yourself be a target (cliche tourist / naive etc.).

I do worry about Scopolamine and how actually one can avoid the being drugged. My cards have a capped daily / weekly limit and pretty stringent fraud protection.

I'll be arriving and I think I'll be choosing an airbnb near centro with no doorman (the building / apartment looks nice). My concern here is, if I bring girls over I have never met, how risky is it to get drugged?

[Nounce]

The system works. Girls 1-3 still fuck for "free" and I defined free before. With Cat Girl out of the picture, some of the other girls are vying for Numero Uno. I've also wrote about at least 3 girls to whom I gave money during the COVID crisis, who avoided me this trip,

If the system works, have you ever considered it may work even better to keep number one spot vacant?