Hey yo guys. Won't be doing it next time.
@jgm005. I know man. It's crazy. Won't be doing it next time. Forsho.
@luvpuss. I wasnt smuggling it dude. It was just for our own use. Anyways. Won't be doing it again as I meantioned it above.
And won't be sticking to european girls this time. Thats something that cannot be done again.
So if you would just let me know whr do I find nice thai chicks. It'll be helpful.
@natty bumpo. Yeah I don't mind spending bucks on girls I find hot. Have you been to thermae and spasso lately? Whats the scenario there?
The problem is that soapy girls don't come out. And escort services are way too costly.
OT you're original point is valid
[quote=harold444; 1216295]stop with the global warming nonsense. many gullible people here will believe you.
global warming is a hoax.
polar bears are not at risk due to global warming. if iceberg they on melt they can swim to next one. lol.
ps to indian fellow who is going to thailand to look for thai girls. good luck. i'm kinda in tune why thai girls not too keeen on indians. they just not a bright bunch![/quote]this is ot, but since i see someone blasting you already i find it necessary to support you, and you are in fact supported by at least 15, 000 science ph d's (including a top mit scientist) who have gone on the record now. all of whom question the central premise that global warming (to the extent it is, was, or has or has not occured) is being provably caused by manmade activities. to be fair, it was not a ground up "hoax" from inception, it was more about massive amounts (now in the billions) of grant money infused into a relatively obscure dept of typical universities, where the grant recipients in effect became rock stars fawned over by a compliant major media industry, and just didn't want to get off the stage when the numbers started to go against them, so they "hid the decline" and rigged other numbers (e. g. cherry picking the russian data to favor temp increases) and clearly corrupted the "peer review" process. the core samples will soon put the entire issue to rest, its a matter of several more years of samples. the polar bear issue is classic because the famous photo was cropped (there is land nearby) and in fact the "peer review" was done by the main scientist's girlfriend, this same sicentist now under criminal investigation by the usa govt. the entire nonsense about polar bears all derived from a single observation by a plane overflying the area that noticed 7 or 8 dead polar bears. they never determined the cause of death nor did any real core research beyond that. keep in mind major corporate interests like (former) enron and ge and even duke energy (all seeing the profit potential) have a major vested interest in keeping the illusion going, so that's why its so difficult to have any honest debate on this.