American Politics

[QUOTE=Spidy;2956516]Pretty good video! The comedic bit of [I][b] "...control room please show me, where Harris called Trump a fascist",[/b][/I] was fantastic. It was a good example and highlighted the Repubs, continually boldface hypocrisy, on who exactly called who fascist. Naturally, it was the senile Trump!

Oh yes! It's all too very funny (and also very delusional), [i][b]when those that would quote and wax poetic about repetitive lying and quote Joseph Goebbels,[/b][/i] don't seem to quite understand when they're being brainwashed by Trump, into believing, many of his lies, which often lead to violence, an arrest, jail or worst.

Their gullibility to accept and believe those same [I][b]"big lies",[/b][/I] about the 2020 election being "stolen", as they now ridiculously believe, every piece of bullshit and wild accusations that comes out of the 78-yr old senile and habitual serial liar's mouth. It is just more evidence of the cult, than a serious political party.

But I guess when you're being lied to on a daily basis, you become blinded or numb to the pathology of Trump. It'd be funny, if it weren't so pitiful and delusional, too watch such brainwashed, zombified, radicalized, cultist behavior, play out in his "clown show" Republican Party.

YES, where do you begin with such nonsensical Repub political culture wars on "woke"?

Well, I can't tell you where to begin, [B]but I can tell you where it ended,[/B] for one "Meatball Ron" DeSantis's 2020 election ("Culture War") campaign run.

With regards to "woke", it was just as equally funny, to see "Meatball Ron" (a name Trump calls him) DeSantis, go down in Repub campaign historical flames, by basically, [I][b]impaling himself on his "woke sword" (...kkkk!), [/b][/I] as one of the WORST run campaigns, in Repub history.

With little to no substance, other than nonsensical "woke" gibberish, he (nor anyone else) could never clearly define, to WTF he was really talking about, other than slinging a "woke" slogan around, to make himself look "cool" and "hip".

Remember the bottom half of his campaign [I](perhaps 6-weeks before he quit and his sponsors dropped him like a bad joke)[/I], he never uttered, another single syllable w/r to his [I][b]"war on woke" (...kkkk!) [/b][/I] and had nothing else meaningful, to say or add to his campaign, after that.

"Meatball Ron" DeSantis's 2020 election campaign, based on nothing but "woke" cultural war propaganda, was an epic and classic textbook campaign failure.[/QUOTE]We can track the Right's and their perennial election benefactors in Mainstream Media's dutiful March toward a Fascist America by their dismissal and acceptance of Trump's thousands upon thousands of America-hating lies as "par for the course. Nothing newsworthy about this, folks" while they nit-pik over Harris' well-informed and intelligent response to the third or tenth question in this or that interview Trump was too limp dick scared to sit for because she hesitated between the words "there" and "is".

And then we have the Right's utter denial and acceptance of it, first with, "Oh, he didn't say that". So you show them the video, then it's "Oh, he didn't mean that. If he wanted to do that he would have done it the first time around. ".

LOL.

They are totally ignorant or is it lovingly accepting of the fact that "the first time around" he TRIED mightily and repeatedly to "do that" but was thwarted and prevented from doing it by the very people in his Administration from his VP to his Defense Secretaries to his Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to his National Security Advisors who are now refusing to endorse him, proudly endorsing Harris or publically outing him as the Fascist To The Core he clearly is and had not yet been crowned King Above The Law by his Loony MAGA Repub 6 on the Supreme Court.

All of which will be different "the second time around. ".

[QUOTE=Spidy;2956494](...kkkk!) Sounds to me like you've got a classic case of Trump "crowd size" and "celebrity" endorsement envy![/QUOTE]I could care less. Hell, even during the "hard hitting" Fox interview, Kamala was boring as fuck. Her speeches are all the same. She is not funny, not interesting, and not entertaining. She has to bring in celebs to get people to come and there have been reports of her having to pay people to attend.

Yes, she drew "big numbers" for the Fox interview but that was people wanting to see a train wreck. She showed up late and her team was frantically waving her to get out of the interview even when she said she had so much more to say. She is running for president for the money, and she would just be a tool for the deep state and the elites. You are dreaming if you think otherwise. Every other line out her mouth is Donald Trump this and Donald Trump that. I think journalist Walter Kirn said it best, "I have no idea who she is. " And neither do you Spidy. The ONLY reason you are praising her is because she is a Democrat. She was the most hated VP in history. Hell, even Biden does not like her. You are going to vote against Trump and for party. You are not voting for her because you have no fucking clue what her plans are. Well, I do. She will do whatever the moneyed interests and deep state wants.

You cannot even refute anything I say. There will be this ridiculous But Trump or some empty platitude like "she showed courage" whatever the fuck that means.

[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2956554]I could care less. ... [/QUOTE] (...kkkk!) Oh, you cared enough,...to at least unwittingly (or wittingly) repeat yourself and basically ask the same questions and post the same [i][b]"garbage" rhetoric.[/b][/i]

[b]Here: [/b][url]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=2953994&viewfull=1#post2953994[/url]

My Answers, here: [b]Harris Dunks On Trump For Being Too 'Exhausted' For Interviews... [/b][url]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=2955067&viewfull=1#post2955067[/url]

[b]And here: [/b][url]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=2955133&viewfull=1#post2955133[/url]

My Answers, here: [b]Harris's strength earns a record setting $1 billion in Q3 alone... [/b][url]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=2955279&viewfull=1#post2955279 [/url]

So speaking of "garbage", rather than posting repeated questions and Repub\MAGA rhetoric, do me a favor and explain, why does Donald Trump, want the U.S. presidency, when he clearly hates America and Americans, as demonstrated by his latest outburst, calling America a "garbage can"?

[i][b]BTW, you've yet to tell me, what are the policies, Trump/Vance ticket is running on?[/b][/i] (a URL link, or article verifying said policies would be nice). Other than tax-cuts for billionaires and dissing Veep Harris, that is? For example, what are their polices, that are going to make American lives better for ALL AMERICANS, that aren't billionaires?

Since you know all about your candidate Trump, as he's been running for office for the last 18 months, this should be easy-peazy, RIGHT?

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2956299]And ONLY thanks to wages raised primarily by Democrats in Blue Cities and Blue State in 2018 and 2019, while Trump and his Repubs squealed like stuck pigs in opposition to it nationally and their idiotic TCJA did near zero to create any noticable additional jobs or higher wages with it than without it but was great for adding $2. 5+ Trillion to the deficit? LOL.

Ok, ya' got me. Now I will thank Democrats in general across the country instead of just Joe and Kamala.[/QUOTE]At the risk of being extremely repetitive, please see Figure 9 in the link below, on page 45.

[URL]https://conference.nber.org/conf_papers/f191672.pdf[/URL]

The paper was published by the NBER, which counts 47 current and former Nobel prize winners as members and affiliates, and was written by economists at Harvard, Princeton, the Treasury Department, and the University of Chicago.

Government revenues from labor, primarily social security and Medicare contributions, exceed the decline in government revenues from the corporate income tax about 5 years after the tax cut. Furthermore, at year 10, revenues from the corporate income tax are higher than they would have been if the federal rate had remained at a sky high rate of 35%!

The fact that government revenues from employment taxes go up in the medium-to-long term as a result of the TCJA's corporate cut means that the TCJA must increase the number of jobs and / or level of wages.

Again, being extremely repetitive, your $2. 5 trillion number is based on old estimates that assume the TCJA changes in the tax code will not sunset. That probably will only happen if Democrats play a part in making that happen. The sane ones don't want to take the federal corporate rate back to 35%, and practically none of them want to let Trump's tax cuts on households making less than $400,000/ year expire.

And, again, as illustrated in Figure 9, the corporate cuts in the long run should actually increase government revenues. So the $2.5 trillion is a pretty darned flaky number.

[QUOTE=Tiny12;2956714]At the risk of being extremely repetitive, please see Figure 9 in the link below.[/QUOTE]Oh, never mind. I forgot you're not very good with figures and graphs:

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2956297]Please quote the exact passage in that link that substantiates your assertion.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Tiny12;2956714]At the risk of being extremely repetitive, please see Figure 9 in the link below, on page 45.

[URL]https://conference.nber.org/conf_papers/f191672.pdf[/URL]

The paper was published by the NBER, which counts 47 current and former Nobel prize winners as members and affiliates, and was written by economists at Harvard, Princeton, the Treasury Department, and the University of Chicago.

Government revenues from labor, primarily social security and Medicare contributions, exceed the decline in government revenues from the corporate income tax about 5 years after the tax cut. Furthermore, at year 10, revenues from the corporate income tax are higher than they would have been if the federal rate had remained at a sky high rate of 35%!

The fact that government revenues from employment taxes go up in the medium-to-long term as a result of the TCJA's corporate cut means that the TCJA must increase the number of jobs and / or level of wages.

Again, being extremely repetitive, your $2. 5 trillion number is based on old estimates that assume the TCJA changes in the tax code will not sunset. That probably will only happen if Democrats play a part in making that happen. The sane ones don't want to take the federal corporate rate back to 35%, and practically none of them want to let Trump's tax cuts on households making less than $400,000/ year expire.

And, again, as illustrated in Figure 9, the corporate cuts in the long run should actually increase government revenues. So the $2.5 trillion is a pretty darned flaky number.[/QUOTE]Nobody needs to download a tiny print file and scroll down forever to page 45 to look Figure 9 to know beyond a doubt how and why wages increased for ANYBODY in 2018 and 2019, which then continued into 2020 until Trump's Pandemic wiped out millions upon millions of jobs. In fact, one oight to be able to actually remember when these events and results were occurring contemporaneously since it wasn't even that long ago.

And it was not, could not possibly have been because Trump and his idiot Repubs' $2. 5+Trillion deficit adding Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was passed on the last business day of 2017.

Why?

Because the major beneficiaries of that Act, corporate CEOs, promised America even before it was passed, blessedly without a single Dem vote, that it would not inspire, encourage or cause them to expand their businesses or create jobs. Primarily, they were going to buy back their failed stock with the hot money windfall from that tax cut.

6 years later, the data proved they kept that promise.

An economic "stimulus" legislation that creates fewer jobs with it than without it does not require anyone to raise wages for anybody no matter how many Trillions it adds to the deficit.

No tiny print file, pages 1 thru 50 and all 9 figures are necessary to understand that.

However, RAISING the minimum wage does increase wages for millions and triggers wage increases further up the ranks as well.

Behold:

[B]CEOs suggest Trump tax cut may lift investors more than jobs.
Oct. 27, 2017[/B]

[URL]https://www.reuters.com/article/business/ceos-suggest-trump-tax-cut-may-lift-investors-more-than-jobs-idUSKBN1CV38R/[/URL]

[B]Six years later, more evidence shows the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act benefits U.S. business owners and executives, not average workers.
December 20, 2023[/B]

[URL]https://equitablegrowth.org/six-years-later-more-evidence-shows-the-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act-benefits-u-s-business-owners-and-executives-not-average-workers/[/URL]

[B]Minimum Wages Rising In 20 States And Several Cities.
Dec. 20, 2018[/B]

[URL]https://www.npr.org/2018/12/30/681055793/minimum-wages-rising-in-20-states-and-several-cities[/URL]

[B]Low-wage workers saw the biggest wage growth in states that increased their minimum wage between 2018 and 2019.
March 4, 2020[/B]

[URL]https://www.epi.org/blog/low-wage-workers-saw-the-biggest-wage-growth-in-states-that-increased-minimum-wage-2018-2019/[/URL]

I have posted these reports before. I trust you are proficient at reading big bold black highlighted headlines, clicking on links and reading large print and fully substantiated reports. Enjoy.

The boss Bruce Springsteen who loves his country, but also support Harris, when Trump is too crazy, unrespectful, dangerous. Even Republican Clint Eastwood doesn t support Trump. Musk must have big interest with Trump, buying a Tesla is supporting Trump.

[QUOTE=Spidy;2956601](...kkkk!) Oh, you cared enough,...to at least unwittingly (or wittingly) repeat yourself and basically ask the same questions and post the same "garbage" rhetoric.

My Answers, here: [b]Harris Dunks On Trump For Being Too 'Exhausted' For Interviews... [/b][url]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=2955067&viewfull=1#post2955067[/url] [/QUOTE]Trump just did 3 hours with Joe Rogan. Kamala did 30 minutes with Fox. In the Rogan interview, the topics were all over the map, and it was a great conversation. You have not been keeping up with the NYT. Even they have been critical of the Trump has no energy and Trump is fascist bullshit.

As for what Trump is going to do, his platform is right here: [URL]https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform[/URL].

I could have written 75% of these without having to look. Trump will reinstate his executive orders on the border. They might be the first thing he does. As for the deportation operation, it would be a mistake to toss all illegals. I think he is going to have to get rid of the known criminals and then focus on an amnesty program. He is not saying that for political purposes but that is what he will be left with. With inflation, he is going to open up ANWAR again which Biden blocked.

At peak production, ANWR could supply up to 1. 45 million barrels of oil per day.

This is more than the USA Imports from Saudi Arabia every day.

Alternatively, 1. 45 million barrels of oil per day is over one quarter of what the USA Imports from OPEC countries each year.

Reducing the Debt, Generating New Federal Revenue Developing ANWR's resources could generate approximately $150 billion to $296 billion in new federal revenue a substantial amount that would help pay down our Nation's debt.

For all the talk of tax cuts, one interesting Trump point, and one he got very little credit for, was getting rid of regulations. He mandated that for each new regulation, two old ones had to be taken away. He said business leaders actually preferred the cut in regulations to a cut in their tax rates.

And these points are no-brainers: Cancel the electric vehicle mandate and cut costly and burdensome regulations.

Cut federal funding for any school pushing critical race theory, radical gender ideology, and other inappropriate racial, sexual, or political content on our children7.

Keep men out of women's sports.

Deport pro-hamas radicals and make our college campuses safe and patriotic again.

Kamala cannot say she will not give sex change operations for free to prisoners or illegals. What the hell is up with that?

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2956552]We can track the Right's and their perennial election benefactors in Mainstream Media's dutiful March toward a Fascist America by their dismissal and acceptance of Trump's thousands upon thousands of America-hating lies as "par for the course. Nothing newsworthy about this, folks" while they nit-pik over Harris' well-informed and intelligent response to the third or tenth question in this or that interview Trump was too limp dick scared to sit for because she hesitated between the words "there" and "is".

And then we have the Right's utter denial and acceptance of it, first with, "Oh, he didn't say that". So you show them the video, then it's "Oh, he didn't mean that. If he wanted to do that he would have done it the first time around. ".

LOL.[/QUOTE]To further illustrate your point on the unfair, unreasonable and abnormally high amount of asymmetric criticism and scrutiny, leveled at Veep Harris, from MSM, news pundits and the like, has not gone unnoticed by some campaign watchers and on two (2) occasions had gone somewhat viral, as main stream media (MSM), were called out on the disparity on the coverage.
[LIST]First there was Van Jones: On a CNN interview panel, aptly said, [i]"Donald Trump gets to be [b]'lawless'[/b] while Kamala Harris, has to be [b]'flawless'[/b] "[/i] [url]https://edition.cnn.com/2024/10/23/politics/video/van-jones-trump-kamala-harris-town-hall-digvid[/url][/LIST][LIST]Second, there was, Charlamagne Tha God: Who went on CNN and challenged Anderson Cooper (CNN anchor), over how the network covers the divisive and "fascist" Donald Trump, compared to the very accomplished egalitarian and freedom fighting, Veep Harris. [url]https://www.huffpost.com/entry/charlamagne-tha-god-cnn-trump-harris-bullshit-anderson-cooper_n_671b17d2e4b051419015eb5c[/url][/LIST]Personally I'm glad to see more people recognize the disparity and address the inequities in the unbalanced coverage, [u]given the platitudes of "garbage" that comes out of Trump's potty mouth.[/u]

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2956552]They are totally ignorant or is it lovingly accepting of the fact that "the first time around" he TRIED mightily and repeatedly to "do that" but was thwarted and prevented from doing it by the very [b]people in his Administration from his VP to his Defense Secretaries to his Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to his National Security Advisors[/b] who are now refusing to endorse him, proudly endorsing Harris or publically outing him as the Fascist To The Core he clearly is and had not yet been crowned King Above The Law by his Loony MAGA Repub 6 on the Supreme Court.[/QUOTE]Correct again, to your points regarding the number of staff members that have previously work with the fascist Trump and have seen the fascist's corrupt dealings, for real, on a daily basis and up close, is staggering. I've simply lost count, of how many Generals and top military personnel have come forward to denounce Trump now? What is it now, 12, 15...20...30...40?

What is clear though, is that as Veep Harris, continues to comport herself, as the ONLY REAL viable presidential candidate, it is becoming increasing clear from many Republicans, presently or formally in office, that their shifting allegiance, to w/r to supporting and voting for Harris, has gained real momentum, in these final few days.

[B]3 more Republicans endorsements[/B], from key battleground swing states, just endorsed Veep Harris. Republican State Sen. Rob Cowles, Green Bay (WI) (and has never before supported a Dem candidate for president), former Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI) has already cast his vote for Harris (call Trump "unhinged") and former Repub Shawn Reilly, Mayor of Waukesha (R-WI) (his 1st ever endorsement of a Dem President).

Credit where credit is due, I think Liz Cheney's permission structure, is working like a charm. But it ONLY WORKS under a Veep Harris campaign, that proudly seeks to UNITE America.

[QUOTE=EihTooms;2956552]All of which will be different [b]"the second time around. "[/b][/QUOTE]Hopefully, there'll be no second time around! So no amount of [i][b]"sane washing",[/b][/i] by Trump apologists, for Trump's "garbage can" potty mouth, is gonna make, the majority (roughly 54% non-MAGA to roughly 46% MAGA) of Americas fall for that okey-doke!

The following opinion piece sums up what is at stake in the 2024 US Election. Vote for Kamela if you want to see the end of the USA as we know it. Vote for Trump if you want to continue to live in the same country that you and everyone you know grew up in.

"The Wall Street Journal editorial page is convinced that if Kamala Harris is elected, she will target the Supreme Court for destruction by "packing" it with political appointees. The opinion makes sense because the court is the strongest barrier to a progressive takeover of the country.

To me, that's the most dangerous political situation this country has faced since the south seceded in 1860. The progressive left is totalitarian, and Ms. Harris is their spear point. The far-left agenda includes the following:

- Amnesty for undocumented migrants.

- Reparations for slavery.

- Allowing the government to undermine parental authority in abortion and gender matters involving their children.

- Severe restrictions on firearms.

- Onerous taxation on the affluent and corporations. "Fair share. ".

- A government-regulated economy that mandates "green" strategies that all companies would have to obey.

- A "reimagining" of criminal punishment. Prison sentences would be reduced dramatically.

- Imposed equity where the federal government would provide entitlements to selected groups.

- Strict limits on speech. New federal laws would punish expression against so-called "marginalized" people. Scandinavian countries have that.

- A weaponized Justice Department and IRS. Those agencies could initiate actions designed to punish political opponents. Few citizens could afford the court costs.

There is no question that progressives support all of the above. Dangerous doesn't even come close.

That's what's at stake on November 5. ".

[QUOTE=Sirioja;2956492]All US women with a brain working, should vote against Trump and leave shameful Texas which would then die in about 50 years, when no more new generation who always came from women belly and they should be free to decide about their belly, just their right in modern countries.[/QUOTE]Women vote more for Harris and frustrated guys about women vote for Trump. Guys didn t understand yet, they come from women belly. If they saw a real size between legs when looking in mirror, they would not be so frustrated about women.

[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2956749]Trump just did 3 hours with Joe Rogan. Kamala did 30 minutes with Fox. In the Rogan interview, the topics were all over the map, and it was a great conversation. You have not been keeping up with the NYT. Even they have been critical of the Trump has no energy and Trump is fascist bullshit.

As for what Trump is going to do, his platform is right here: [URL]https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform[/URL][/QUOTE]

(...kkkk!) Dude, even you know, when it comes to mongering, it's [i][b]"quality"[/b][/i] over [i][b]"quantity"[/b][/i]. The same applies, when comparing and contrasting the 30-min. strong, courageous, intelligible and lucid interview, in the "Lion's Den" with a combative Baier, told us more about the Harris's strength and fortitude of character, than any 3-hour, puff-piece interview, in friendly [b]"bro"[/b] territory.

[b]Donald Trump's Joe Rogan interview was a brain-rotted waste of 3 hours [/b]
[URL]https://eu.tennessean.com/story/entertainment/media/2024/10/26/donald-trump-joe-rogan-interview/75862377007/[/URL]

[b]6 Takeaways From Donald Trumps 3-Hour Podcast With Joe Rogan[/b]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/25/us/politics/trump-joe-rogan-podcast.html[/URL]

[QUOTE]Much of the discussion centered on refrains familiar from Mr. Trumps rambling speeches on the campaign trail, but the podcast offered Mr. Trump an opportunity to reach an audience his campaign covets.[/QUOTE]
Needless to say, the 3-hour waste of time by DJT, was universally panned, as yet another [i][b]"Trump brain fart" (...kkkk!),[/b][/i] and widely seen as a [i]"brain-rotted waste of 3-hours".[/i]

But, hey look I think, we've all had endless hours of [i]"conversations"[/i] with friends talking about "E.T.s", life on mars and other irrelevant non-presidential issues of the day not entirely germane at all, to helping working Americans, live their best future lives, but none of us are running for president.

Just like the recent NYC rally and the 3-hour Rogan podcast, it's plainly obvious to the non-gullible, non-MAGA and non-brainwashed, that those [i]"Trump campaign policies"[/i], outlined in the link provided, are nothing more than a carnival of grievances, misogyny, racism and a well catered to "billionaire buddy club's" get richer wish list!

[i][b]What the heck, Elvis 2008, half of those "policies", read like Trump's felony rap-sheet of violations and crimes he's committed! (...kkkk!) [/b][/i]

And at any time, has DTJ, even [u]provided details explanations, facts & figures, numbers or costs[/u] on the how, what, when, where and why of it all, w/r to the twenty (20) felonies and sound-bites, ahem!...I mean campaign policies, and how they'll impact the lives of working Americans, outside of his "billionaire buddy" class and his personal grievances?

[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2956857]The following opinion piece sums up what is at stake in the 2024 US Election. Vote for Kamela if you want to see the end of the USA as we know it. Vote for Trump if you want to continue to live in the same country that you and everyone you know grew up in.

"The Wall Street Journal editorial page is convinced that if Kamala Harris is elected, she will target the Supreme Court for destruction by "packing" it with political appointees. The opinion makes sense because the court is the strongest barrier to a progressive takeover of the country.

To me, that's the most dangerous political situation this country has faced since the south seceded in 1860. The progressive left is totalitarian, and Ms. Harris is their spear point. The far-left agenda includes the following:

- Amnesty for undocumented migrants.

- Reparations for slavery.

- Allowing the government to undermine parental authority in abortion and gender matters involving their children.

- Severe restrictions on firearms.

- Onerous taxation on the affluent and corporations. "Fair share. ".

- A government-regulated economy that mandates "green" strategies that all companies would have to obey.

- A "reimagining" of criminal punishment. Prison sentences would be reduced dramatically.

- Imposed equity where the federal government would provide entitlements to selected groups.

- Strict limits on speech. New federal laws would punish expression against so-called "marginalized" people. Scandinavian countries have that.

- A weaponized Justice Department and IRS. Those agencies could initiate actions designed to punish political opponents. Few citizens could afford the court costs.

There is no question that progressives support all of the above. Dangerous doesn't even come close.

That's what's at stake on November 5. ".[/QUOTE]Here is Kamala Harris' platform: [URL]https://kamalaharris.com/issues/[/URL].

Can you show me where she says she will do all of the things you claim that she will do?

[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2956857]The following opinion piece sums up what is at stake in the 2024 US Election. Vote for Kamela if you want to see the end of the USA as we know it. Vote for Trump if you want to continue to live in the same country that you and everyone you know grew up in.

"The Wall Street Journal editorial page is convinced that if Kamala Harris is elected, she will target the Supreme Court for destruction by "packing" it with political appointees. The opinion makes sense because the court is the strongest barrier to a progressive takeover of the country.

To me, that's the most dangerous political situation this country has faced since the south seceded in 1860. The progressive left is totalitarian, and Ms. Harris is their spear point. The far-left agenda includes the following:

- Amnesty for undocumented migrants.

- Reparations for slavery..[/QUOTE]This video is less than 20 minutes long yet chock-full of Trump's 2nd term plans and proposals. Please pay it forward to other Trump supporters you know.

I know most of you have already voted. But, should Trump squeak out an EC Vote lead next week, this overview will tell you some things your and anyone else's vote for anyone other than Harris has contributed to accomplishing.

BTW, I disagree greatly with Jimmy Kimmel here. This election is partially about what he said. But it is also very much about policy and stewardship results:

[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/10/jimmy-kimmel-makes-persuasive-case-against[/URL]

This historic, roaring, job-creating Dem Economic Recovery and expansion is almost getting out of hand.

You know, we might need to open the borders a bit more very soon just to fill those jobs and keep the Good Times and Happy Days rolling!

[B]Private job creation totaled 233,000 in October, far more than expected, ADP says.[/B]

[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/30/private-job-creation-totaled-a-stunning-233000-in-october-far-more-than-expected-adp-says.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]

[QUOTE]ADP said private companies hired 233,000 new workers in the month, better than the upwardly revised 159,000 in September and far ahead of the Dow Jones estimate for 113,000.

It was the best month for job creation since July 2023.

The numbers counter expectations for a slowdown in October on the heels of two brutal hurricanes and strikes at Boeing and ports on the Eastern Seaboard.[/QUOTE]