Bangkok Massage Parlors - Except TULIP and ANNIES!

[QUOTE=Allover;2227001]I got 2 shots and 90 minutes over 90% of the time. I thought it was just standard. Thanks for the info about soapies that remain open. Per Google Maps it appears Hi Class, Saifon, Biwa, Hawaii, and Angelina are still operating, too. [/QUOTE]These places you list are budget Soapies. You might be shocked at how unappealing the women can be in these places. I certainly was. I did do a Hi Class girl in former times worth repeating but she disappeared quickly. Recent visit was all uglies to my taste. Hawaii, I may have done a girl years ago. Can't even remember now. The others have visited but nothing at all doable to my standard. Angelina, Saifon, and Biwa were extreme low class, in my view (and low price accordingly). Clearly an old ugly fat girl is cheaper than a young model. Okay For guys wanting a cheap piece of meat. Actually my memory of Angelina fades. I maybe unfair for that one. It was Christina that was the worst of the worst, when I visited.

Is Catherine still open? Might be a better bet as bigger line up. The better lookers are heavily booked out though.

I was once a frequent customer for Amsterdam, Copa Cabana and Long Beech, but I think all of these closed. Amsterdam amalgamated with Emmanuelle whose business was right down previously so gave it a boost. Some lookers in Emmanuelle. My last experience was very disappointing with a young slim stunner though. She probably just doesn't perform for Farangs (at a guess). My last Meree girl was really good, so for me it is all just hit and miss. Last Merci girl was crappy. Last Ocean girl (before it closed) was good.

Probably I get a 50% hit rate overall but lower than that for La Belle, my most unlucky venue.

The higher the percentage of Farang customers, the better your chances is my assessment, otherwise too many girls are dick scared and restrictive. If can find girls that prefer Farangs, then can be great. That is my aim in bars too. Get girls that much prefer Farangs. Hard to do when many bars are becoming heavily dominated by Asian guests.

With all the soapies closing, I was wondering if Emmanuelle is worth a visit.

Anyone been here lately?

I visited Emmanuelle about 10 days ago and La Belle last Wednesday night. I also visited Mitu about 2 weeks ago. I had a varying good time in all three. La Belle had the best looking girls although the Emmanuelle lineup came in a close 2nd and was considerably cheaper. And although my session in Mitu was a sloppy / slurpy good time, my girl was at best 5. 2 stars in looks.

#1. Best time, best girl, best service: La Belle and I plan to repeat with my "p" category girl. BTW, La Belle had a large lineup of sideline girls. But, I thought my girl, who was not cheap, was probably the 2nd or 3rd best looking girl in the place. The Score: My Girl - 7. 2 Stars looks. Service 8. 5 stars. Accommodations (if anyone cares) 9 stars. WIR, yes and I plan to repeat with the girl. It was one of my better evenings this trip.

#2. Emmanuelle: My girl was an "S" category girl so she was considerably cheaper than my La Belle girl, yet she looked real good and had nice ta ta's. Service was ok, but nothing to write home about. Accommodations were ok too, but not as Hi class as La Belle. The Score: My Girl 7 stars in looks. Service 6 stars. Accommodations 6 stars. WIR, yes, but I will select a different girl next time.

#3. Mitu: My girl was a 5 star Mitu category girl. Based on her service I wonder what their 6 star girls are like. But overall I don't like Mitu's business plan. Why? Well 1. You don't get a line up. What you see are computer images (photos of face and body) of all the girls including the ones not there. 2. You must pay in advance after selecting your girl, but before you actually see her in the flesh and this is a VERY VERY BAD IDEA! I predict that either Mitu will abandon this plan or go out of business. But I went along with it because I wanted to see what was going on.

So after payment was rendered I got to see my girl in the flesh and I was underwhelmed because she did not look like her photos. I thought about bailing at this point, but decided to take one for the team. So here is my review. The Score: My Girl - 5. 2 stars in looks and that is being very kind. Service: 8. 3 stars. Yeah, I really had a good time with this one. Go figure. We were slipping and sliding all over a giant air mattress with this gompy goop all over us and it was a lot of fun. Girl got into it too. So it was a wild session. Accomadation: 5. 5 stars. It's not much more than any other oily massage room except larger and divided into a wet room area and a dry room area. We never got to the dry area. We shagged in multiple positions all on the air mattress and I have no complaint about that. WIR, probably not unless they begin to show customers a real lineup of their girls. I don't know what they are afraid of. They are in the business of offering top service, not top looking girls. They shouldn't try to hide that fact. Still, I wonder what service a 6 Star Mitu girl might provide over and above what my 5 star girl gave me.

Summary: based on my limited September Soapy experience thus far, I rate La Belle #1. They have the best looking girls and at least my girl performed really well. It was a memeorable session. The only downside. Yeah you guessed it: expensive, but worth it IMHO. Emmanuelle has a pretty good lineup too and more reasonable prices, but I want more than what I received from my girl so #2, but I might go back and if I do I will check out a different girl. Mitu. I think I said it all in the paragraph above. 555.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;2227287]...
Because I am difficult to cum, it would be fair for me to pay extra for a 2nd shot. It will be hard work for her, and 2nd shot may not be completed. I can see that some other guys could be less work to get them 2 or 3 shots than for my first one. So can we expect total fairness from a girl? Only from some girls.[/QUOTE]I think virtually every guy takes longer to cum, when he is working on his 2nd or 3rd shot with the lady. But from a guy's point of view, this is usually a blessing to enjoy, rather than a problem to regret.

In sex, as in many other things in life, you get far more enjoyment from your journey, than from your arrival. That's why you want to take your time doing it, rather than just finish quickly.

The big problem with one-shot restriction for everybody is that guys vary a lot in how long they can last. One guy can last for 20-30 minutes and be satisfied with one shot. While another guy might last less than 2 minutes and be unhappy with it.

This isn't just about the work for the lady. Because the 30-minute guy really works the lady, while the 2-minute guy barely touches her, before he is finished with her. And yet both guys pay the same, as if the lady works the same with both of them.

This arrangement can be fair for one guy and not so fair for another. That's why ladies need some discretion to make it fair for everyone. And the rules should reflect how much work the lady does, rather than use some indirect criteria, such as the number of cumshots the guy has.

It's convenient to count the number of cumshots the guy has. But this isn't a fair measure of how much work the lady does. And this isn't a fair measure of how much pleasure the guy gets either. Because most of the pleasure is in the ride, and not in the finish.

A more fair way to measure the lady's work is to measure the time she and the guy spend doing various sex-acts. Perhaps this is harder to measure and harder to agree upon. But this is a direct measure of the lady's work that's more or less the same for every guy.

This still isn't a perfect measure. Because one guy can bang the lady harder than another for same amount of time. But it comes closer to being fair, than simply counting the number of cumshots the guy has. The cumshot count doesn't measure fairly either the amount of work the lady does or the amount of pleasure the guy has.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;2227292]These places you list are budget Soapies. You might be shocked at how unappealing the women can be in these places. I certainly was.[/QUOTE]I agree these are low end soapies. They didn't have good selections in the old days and I suppose their selections would be awful now. Even the better rated soapies girls are not that beautiful now. Cupidy used to have a huge selection of girls but was a tourist rip off type of place. La Defense used to be good and I will have a look there on my next visit. Catherine, which was almost next door to La Defense, is probably closed but that is not confirmed.

Glad to read Natty's recent soapy reports. It seems many of us stay away from soapies now for reasons I understand.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;2226880]Bangkok
Interesting you got two shots in the early days. I did not know as never tried for 2 shots and girls did not typically offer. Normally girls wasted huge amounts of time in bath, massage etc. So was never enough time left for 2 shots (I am slow). I recall having to extend to get even one sometimes. Come to think of it. I probably did get 2 (or 2nd attempt) on occasion, e. G when fucked girl on body slide mat right at the start at Mona Lisa.[/QUOTE]I'm not sure whether you considered Annie's a soapy cause it was sort of a hybrid but I ALWAYS got at least two shots there and sometimes three if I could manage. I fondly remember my first session with one of their providers who later became my regular. After the shower and mat play and first shot via BBBJ she asked me how many more times I wanted to cum. My reply; as many times as you can make me cum and as long as you cum at least once. She laughed and said, "we'll see". Thereafter our sessions were always near GFE and I can assure you that there was never a question of only one shot.

[QUOTE=Lion55;2227713]I'm not sure whether you considered Annie's a soapy cause it was sort of a hybrid but I ALWAYS got at least two shots there and sometimes three if I could manage. I fondly remember my first session with one of their providers who later became my regular. After the shower and mat play and first shot via BBBJ she asked me how many more times I wanted to cum. My reply; as many times as you can make me cum and as long as you cum at least once. She laughed and said, "we'll see". Thereafter our sessions were always near GFE and I can assure you that there was never a question of only one shot.[/QUOTE]Yes sure it was considered the norm to get two shots at Annies. Annies was different. LOL Yes I did consider it to be a hybrid between a typical Soapy and an Oily. Many aspects did not quite fit the normal Soapy pattern. The most important was the line up was not available for unlimited duration viewing. You were expected to choose quickly. Secondly the rooms were a bit too shitty to be typical even if had a bath. There was no proper bed, so that is not quite typical. There are quite a number of Oilies with a bath and also with a body slide mat.

If one says the definition of a Soapy is any place where there is a bath with soapy suds, and there is a fishbowl, then it must be a Soapy, they are fine. Just that Annies did not feel like a Soapy to me, after many years of Soapy experience, elsewhere. It felt like an Oily with some Soapy aspects.

[QUOTE=Allover;2227564]I agree these are low end soapies. They didn't have good selections in the old days and I suppose their selections would be awful now. Even the better rated soapies girls are not that beautiful now. Cupidy used to have a huge selection of girls but was a tourist rip off type of place. La Defense used to be good and I will have a look there on my next visit. Catherine, which was almost next door to La Defense, is probably closed but that is not confirmed.

Glad to read Natty's recent soapy reports. It seems many of us stay away from soapies now for reasons I understand.[/QUOTE]I used to like Soapies when I had unlimited mongering time available, and when I found some good regular girls there. Normally had to take time to get to the venue potentially dodging a lot of traffic. I recognise I must be harder to please than most due to preference for natural over surgeries. In old days that was not a big problem. In old days, the girls seemed to like Farangs a lot more than they do now, or was it only younger Farangs, I don't know.

Oily MPs have the advantage of many shops near to each other when browsing. Visiting several soapies would take a lot more time.

Undoubtedly the cost of prettiest Soapy girls has put me off somewhat. To get a natural looking stunner at The Lord would have a very high price. When I was a regular at Chao Phraya 2, many years ago, there were no really high priced girls, and the line up was large. It was good value, and most girls tried seemed to be good. They needed the repeat business. The ones for my spec were probably not popular with the Thai customers who liked voluptuous Chinese looking types. I liked slim natural exotic looking Thais.

[QUOTE=NattyBumpo;2227439]I visited Emmanuelle about 10 days ago and La Belle last Wednesday night. I also visited Mitu about 2 weeks ago. I had a varying good time in all three. La Belle had the best looking girls although the Emmanuelle lineup came in a close 2nd and was considerably cheaper. And although my session in Mitu was a sloppy / slurpy good time, my girl was at best 5. 2 stars in looks.

#1. Best time, best girl, best service: La Belle and I plan to repeat with my "p" category girl. BTW, La Belle had a large lineup of sideline girls. But, I thought my girl, who was not cheap, was probably the 2nd or 3rd best looking girl in the place. The Score: My Girl - 7. 2 Stars looks. Service 8. 5 stars. Accommodations (if anyone cares) 9 stars. WIR, yes and I plan to repeat with the girl. It was one of my better evenings this trip.

#2. Emmanuelle: My girl was an "S" category girl so she was considerably cheaper than my La Belle girl, yet she looked real good and had nice ta ta's. Service was ok, but nothing to write home about. Accommodations were ok too, but not as Hi class as La Belle. The Score: My Girl 7 stars in looks. Service 6 stars. Accommodations 6 stars. WIR, yes, but I will select a different girl next time.

#3. Mitu: My girl was a 5 star Mitu category girl. Based on her service I wonder what their 6 star girls are like. But overall I don't like Mitu's business plan. Why? Well 1. You don't get a line up. What you see are computer images (photos of face and body) of all the girls including the ones not there. 2. You must pay in advance after selecting your girl, but before you actually see her in the flesh and this is a VERY VERY BAD IDEA! I predict that either Mitu will abandon this plan or go out of business. But I went along with it because I wanted to see what was going on.

So after payment was rendered I got to see my girl in the flesh and I was underwhelmed because she did not look like her photos. I thought about bailing at this point, but decided to take one for the team. So here is my review. The Score: My Girl - 5. 2 stars in looks and that is being very kind. Service: 8. 3 stars. Yeah, I really had a good time with this one. Go figure. We were slipping and sliding all over a giant air mattress with this gompy goop all over us and it was a lot of fun. Girl got into it too. So it was a wild session. Accomadation: 5. 5 stars. It's not much more than any other oily massage room except larger and divided into a wet room area and a dry room area. We never got to the dry area. We shagged in multiple positions all on the air mattress and I have no complaint about that. WIR, probably not unless they begin to show customers a real lineup of their girls. I don't know what they are afraid of. They are in the business of offering top service, not top looking girls. They shouldn't try to hide that fact. Still, I wonder what service a 6 Star Mitu girl might provide over and above what my 5 star girl gave me.

Summary: based on my limited September Soapy experience thus far, I rate La Belle #1. They have the best looking girls and at least my girl performed really well. It was a memeorable session. The only downside. Yeah you guessed it: expensive, but worth it IMHO. Emmanuelle has a pretty good lineup too and more reasonable prices, but I want more than what I received from my girl so #2, but I might go back and if I do I will check out a different girl. Mitu. I think I said it all in the paragraph above. 555.[/QUOTE]I have to assume that 5. 2 stars is score of 5. 2 out of 10, is that right? I was a little confused since normally 5 stars is the maximum possible.

I think you confirm very well that all depends on making the right or lucky choice. The experience can vary a lot, depending on girl chosen. Venue may be less important. Unclear.

Strangely most girls I picked at La Belle were not worth repeating. So I have to assume just did not have a lot of luck, or my picking sucks some how. Still it has to mean that for me La Belle is not rated as a happy hunting ground, but my assessment is out of date.

Many places cannot be rated well as the girls sampled were too few. My most recent pick at Emmanuelle was bad but previously (too long ago) had better. Poseidon girls were generally a bit hit and miss for me. Unreliable place. Don't have a confirmed favourite Soapy venue any more. For a while was Amsterdam mainly due to a single very curvy and very pretty natural girl. Well missed. Now it is about individual girls, not venues, for me.

Generally had a good time with body slides previously at Annies and Chrome bar, with very few dud girls chosen there. Probably venues with more girls preferring Farangs.

[QUOTE=Zauberfee;2206876]Savannah Massage at Udom Suk Soi 7: [URL]http://savannamassagebangkok.com/[/URL].

JJ / Jenny is a good recommendation for you, I would avoid Nancy, the youngest and cutest girl in the shop.[/QUOTE]Hi,

I am a newbie and I have planned to make a booking for Nancy at Savanna Massage. Can you tell me why you would avoid Nancy? Also, is JJ listed on their website? Thanks!

Hey guys,

It's my first time in Bangkok. Went to mango massage and Cherry.

First was with Bo, a cute slim girl with tanned skin and braces who has been mentioned in this forum before. GFE was 9/10 and looks were 8/10. Took her for 1. 5 HR and we started of with a shower and a so called massage. After 5 minutes I flipped over and started kissing and she started DFK. Got the condom on and her pussy was really tight so couldn't enter, so she applied lube and got on top. We fucked in several positions and came in BBBJ.

Repeated Bo again after a week, good experience again.

Third was Cherry massage, the lineup was not good. Wanted to try A+ so asked about Venus, but mama-san said she was on a leave. So took Ice for 1 hour, has pics on the website. Looks were 5/10 and had fake boobs. She asked me if I wanted a shower, and I said yes and the hot water was not working, so I had to take a shower in cold water. She didn't seem so interested in her work. She started with a blow job. I asked her for Sex and asked front or back, I started with back and she applied oil to my dick, and I sorted slowly. Her asshole was really tight and I finished soon. Then she did some okay massage and we started the second round and her pussy was really tight. Did her in doggy and missionary. WIR: No.

Forth, called Mango to book Bo again (yes she was that good) but they replied she stopped working. Wanted to try a new girl so booked May. Looks good but has a bit of facial hair above her lips and has fake Boobs, a little bit of tummy, but was slim. She was very chatty right from the start and kept on teasing me and was very playful. Started with a low pressure massage for 10 minutes, flipped and asked me if I wanted a BBBJ or covered, went with BBBJ. After some time I asked her to switch to Sex and she lube up and we did it in different positions and I came in missionary. She started the massage again while chatting and singing few lines in between. She was funny and a little annoying. I was recharged for the second round so decided to take control and laid her on the bed. I started kissing her and slowly fingering her, and made her cum after some time. She was surprised by this. After this I started doing in missionary and doggy for 15 min but couldn't finish and the time got over, so took a shower and left. WIR: maybe, but I will try Get and Prae before that.

[QUOTE=Piedipie;2227955] Forth, called Mango to book Bo again (yes she was that good) but they replied she stopped working.[/QUOTE]Yes I repeated Bo also, but a pity she is gone already. Despite medium dark skin she was better looking than the others, not ultra slim but slim enough and so enthusiastic as you said.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;2228157]Yes I repeated Bo also, but a pity she is gone already. Despite medium dark skin she was better looking than the others, not ultra slim but slim enough and so enthusiastic as you said.[/QUOTE]No real lookers in the PSE shops anymore. Those days are long gone.

[QUOTE=Syzygies;2228157]Yes I repeated Bo also, but a pity she is gone already. Despite medium dark skin she was better looking than the others, not ultra slim but slim enough and so enthusiastic as you said.[/QUOTE]Can you recommend any girls with similar GFE?

[QUOTE=Piedipie;2228382]Can you recommend any girls with similar GFE?[/QUOTE]All my regular MP girls are gone or sporadically working, and I cannot guarantee GFE anyway. Girls can get more GFE once you have become regular, and others like Bo were great from first session. Prae was good in the past, but not my spec now.

I noticed Orient had two nice looking girls on a recent visit. GFE, I can't say.

I normally post a review of all decent girls tried. Not much reviews recently. As Goat says, hard to find girls appealing enough for me, such that even 20 girls in Club 102 were not really to my taste. They were probably mystified that I did not like the line up, no girl a real beauty for the face. Clearly most guys do like it. Young = beautiful. LOL.

Tomboy Pheung at Chrome now according to Annies website (was No. 14 Annies) has great curvy body and was a good GFE for me in the past. Skin not light. More like a short Halle Berry. Check out the Annies ladies website.