Am I worried about catching Herpes HSV-2? Nuh!
[QUOTE=Luvpuss; 1261279]More scared of Chlamydia than Herpes? HUH? You can get rid of Chlam in a few days. Did you sleep through your 6th grade sex ed?
Herpes will only last for your entire life. When you get a breakout which for some is several times a year, you have numerous open sores on your cock for 7 to 10 days. Duh, which sounds better?[/QUOTE]Luvpus,
You don't seem to understand that I believe, if haven't ever had a cold sore, despite kissing so many girls that have had them, then I believe I am extremely unlikely to ever get one. I am not scared of them anymore. I don't fully understand them but am aware I am just not getting them.
So for everything its a combination equation of the seriousness of the problem and the risk of getting it.
I do understand Chlamydia is not serious to my health but may have serious implications if my GF should catch it from me too. I have had it twice already long time ago. Its very very easy to catch, even using condoms. Can be transferred even by fingers. So it is the extreme ease of getting it that concerns me and the family implications.
Herpes is not so easy to catch, and I take precautions as far as possible. I don't believe I am at all likely to get it. The chances of me getting AIDS is much lower still. I am not in major risk categories. Maybe 1 in million. So not a big worry.
I am also not that scared of great white sharks, purely because the risk is so small.
Look, I am willing to do some research to find out a bit more about Herpes, since I am not expert, and really know the exact risks of getting it. Okay I have heard about the results of having it already. Its not deadly. Although I have previously been tested for genital Herpes, apparently tests are not always that conclusive so many people that have it, may not even know they have it. So its not that bad for many. It sounds like having a bad pimple that lasts longer. Its not that easy for a guy to catch from a girl. Genital Herpes HSV-2 is actually considered less dangerous than Oral Herpes HSV-1. [URL=http://www.herpes.com/hsv1-2.html]Comparison click here[/URL]
"Transmission risk from infected female to male is approximately 4–5% annually. Anti-viral therapy can reduce this risk by 50%." This I found in wikipedia for monogamous couples not using condoms. Maybe husbands don't get that much sex? :D So you can imagine the risk from a single sex session with a girl (unknown to be infected or not and no obvious breakouts) and using condoms is getting extremely low. Then it has to be multiplied by mongering frequency.
I also read that 1 in 8 Australians have genital Herpes. A high percentage of these are females because females catch it more easily. 80% are unaware they have it. I guess this is consistent with some people having had a large number of sexual partners without condom use. I haven't.
I know someone wanting to get an STD will manage to get Chlamydia or Gonorrhea far more quickly. Those seem to be the easiest. Syphilus seems to be less prevalent but more dangerous.
P.S. During my 7th grade sex-Ed they only mentioned the gloom and doom from Syphilus, Gonorrhea, NSU and that's about it. Herpes never got mentioned. I probably only first heard of Herpes when about 18 to 20 years old. I might be older than some forum members. It was a big deal for a few years, mainly due to lack of a complete cure, before the hype faded away. Once HIV came on the scene, Herpes appeared to be largely relegated back to get very little further publicity. After all its only like cold sores and not not deadly. How useful was school sex-Ed? I only ever received about 2 hours worth, and it was not that useful, other than to be aware STDs exist.
I prefer to be skeptical when some things just don't make good sense.
I don't believe everything I read in the media, specially if it comes from corrupt goverments.
Reading a lot of scentific debate, its clear that some of these things about AIS in particular are not as well understood as what some claim.
[QUOTE=Sammon;1261672]However there are different strains. Some are virulent and people die of it.[/QUOTE]Do you know how difficult it is to see the HIV virus, and how difficult it is to isolate? Its only a theory that there are multiple strains to try to explain baffling things.
[QUOTE]You do not have to be in the risk category to get it. Only in western countries it is mostly spread by homosexuals and intravenous drug abusers. But in Africa and Asia it is spread through heterosexuals as well.[/QUOTE]Why is that? Some say Africa must have a different strain that never goes to western countries. Others says that Africans get it much more easily because they lack basic nutrition and basic health care.
[QUOTE]All diseases have a highly infective stage including common cold. If you happen to kiss at that stage chances are higher you get the cold. Once again depends on your immunity.[/QUOTE]I have read that its the other person's breathe, hands, or worse still sneeze, that is much more dangerous than their saliva. You don't have to kiss to catch it.
[QUOTE]People with AIDS have symptoms like looking thin and sickly. Africans initially called it slim disease. They tend to have elevated body temperature all the time, get tired easily and have other infections.[/QUOTE]Maybe some cases of AIDS are actually just malnutrition or "slim disease". If should test postive for HIV (an unreliable test) then it will be called AIDS, otherwise its called malnutrition, or some other thing that is believed to weaken the immune system, like Syphilus for example. Of course most Africans can't afford HIV tests, so its often called AIDS anyway. Malnutrition and lack of suitable drinking water seems to be the most fatal "disease" in Africa. The land is barren, the climate is bad, the goverments are corrupt, etc. A huge percentage test positive to HIV. Its probably not worth worrying about that. Its not the main cause of death. Is HIV a new disease that is so widespread because they are all rampant fuckers with no protection, or would all these people have tested HIV + just the same centuries ago.