Printable View
Epstein took the Fifth when asked if Trump was ever present with he Epstein while in the presence of girls. So Epstein clearly had something he wanted to hide:
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/video-jeffrey-epstein-talking-about-donald-trump-resurfaces-2103285[/URL].
The damn building he insists is the reason for a non-existant cost overrun was a seperate renovation project and built 5 damn years ago! Which was when Trump was president and busy laying the groundwork for, ushering in and exacerbating Trump's Pandemic in order to Mass Murder at least a Million Americans, millions more around the world, crash global supply-chains and economies, wipe out millions upon millions of jobs and trigger all of the world-wide hyper-inflation that followed.
[B]Trump and Powell spar over costs of Fed renovations.
July 25, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-powell-spar-over-costs-fed-renovations-2025-07-24/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Trump, standing shoulder to shoulder with Powell as both wore construction helmets, said Fed renovation costs had jumped from $2.7 billion to $3.1 billion, causing the Fed chief to say Im not aware of that.
Trump replied, It just came out and Powell again questioned where the presidents number had come from, as it had not come from the central bank.
Powell then noted that it appeared that the president had included in the current cost of fixing up two buildings what it cost to overhaul another central bank office. "You just added in a third building that was built five years ago. We finished Martin five years ago," the Fed leader said.[/QUOTE]Lolol. Clearly, the only "expertise" deadbeat Trump ever developed in the construction and renovation business was in hiring contractors, not paying them for their work and then suing them with daddy's money until he drove them and the building investors into bankruptcy.
So we can only assume that will be what he expects Powell to do as well.
[QUOTE=TheCane;3016556]Epstein took the Fifth when asked if Trump was ever present with he Epstein while in the presence of girls. So Epstein clearly had something he wanted to hide:
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/video-jeffrey-epstein-talking-about-donald-trump-resurfaces-2103285[/URL].[/QUOTE]It's a cover-up. We heard Elon say Trump doesn't want to release client files because he's in it. The GOP Congress ran away like scalded dogs than seek the contents of the file.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3016525][b]LMAO why didn't Scumbags Barry or Joe release the info LOL [/b]
Be careful what you wish for, the Demoturds don't want the files public.[/QUOTE]Your orange mango MAGA Fuhrer, was dumb enough to campaign hard on the promise the "Release of the Epstein Pedo Sex Files (EPSF), to appease his gullible MAGA Base. Welcome to another term of lies and corruption, as the MAGA suckers meltdown, on yet another campaign promise (lie) turned to SHIT!
[B]Why Republicans can't hide from their Epstein problem[/B], Jul 23rd, 2025.
[URL]https://edition.cnn.com/2025/07/23/politics/house-recess-epstein-files-trump[/URL]
Do the Dems really need to do a darn thing? Especially, when they have the [I][b]"stupid", "foolish""[/b][/I] and [I][b]"weaklings"[/b][/I] MAGA suckers, that are vilifying your MAGA Fuhrer just fine! [I][b](...kkkk!)[/b][/I]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3016535]Paying hush money is not a crime.
And what was the crime Trump was trying to conceal? And was he convicted of said crime? The alleged crime you Democratic douches keep trying to refer to is paying hush money which is legal!
The answer to the second question is no, Trump was not convicted of any other crime. The answer to the first question is that Bragg never mentioned until closing arguments what crime Trump was covering up. In the end, he gave out three POSSIBLE crimes and told jurors to pick whichever they wanted.
This comes nowhere close to meeting the beyond a reasonable doubt standard for criminal behavior. Yeah, we think the defendant may have been guilty of one of these crimes and we have had no proof or testimony to back up his guilt of such a crime.
So when you say Bragg convicted charged people like he did Trump, that would mean he went after pols for bookkeeping errors and linked them to alleged crimes. Do you have any other example of that? Of course, you don't.
And the 34 counts were one charge, a bookkeeping entry to conceal a crime, repeated 34 times.
But we know you are lying Loony Tooms! That you want to keep lying about this after Trump gets elected means we need to go after those trying to upend our Democracy by trying to win in the courts versus the election.
What Russiagate showed is you Democratic douches have no respect for election results.[/QUOTE]Re-posting a link from my previous post on this topic, for the very, very slow learners:
[B]Debunking 12 Myths About Trumps Conviction.
June 4, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://time.com/6985532/trump-conviction-myths-debunked-essay/[/URL]
The second sentence in that link:
[QUOTE]A jury returned a verdict finding that Trump had caused the falsification of checks, invoices, and ledgers to conceal the payment of $130,000 to adult film actress Stormy Daniels shortly before the 2016 presidential election, [b]with intent to conceal the violation of campaign finance and tax laws.[/b][/QUOTE]How do we know that was Trump's intent?
Because that is what Trump's attorney admitted to under oath:
[B]Former Trump lawyer Cohen admits campaign law violation.
Aug. 22, 2018[/B]
[URL]https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/top/364626/former-trump-lawyer-cohen-admits-campaign-law-violation[/URL]
[QUOTE][b]He said he did so at the direction of "the candidate" and that he acted for the "purpose of influencing election".[/b]
Mr Cohen's admission was related to hush money paid to women who had claimed to have had affairs with Mr Trump.[/QUOTE]And again, under oath, at Trump's trial:
[B]'At the direction of Donald J. Trump': Michael Cohen details Trump's role in his repeated lies.
May 14, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/michael-cohen-returns-witness-stand-trump-hush-money-trial-rcna151651[/URL]
[QUOTE]Cohen said he previously claimed to be the sole person behind the $130,000 payment to Daniels as a protective measure "to stay on message, to demonstrate continued loyalty to Trump. [B]But in reality, he said, everything he did was "at the direction of Donald J. Trump."[/b][/QUOTE]Why don't we believe Trump was really only claiming those otherwise legal "hush money" payments as "Campaign Contributions" that might possibly kinda sorta stayed within campaign laws and not risen to the level of a crime, which is what it was?
Because none of those 34 seperate payments claimed as such as signed off by Trump himself and neither Trump nor any credible witness testified anything like that as a 34 times "bookkeeping error" under oath.
See, that exact same principle applied to all of the other thousands and thousands of charges and convictions involving falsifying business records.
The fact that no other pol had been so stupid and corrupt to have applied committed that particular crime in that particularly stupid and easy to discover way is immaterial to the law but tells us much about Donald Trump's hilariously inflated view of himself.
Trump is also the only POTUS to lead a violent, cop-killing mob of insurrectionists into battle on American soil to overthrow a free and fair election in his War Against America and American Democracy.
So what? That shouldn't surprise anyone.
And see how blissfully clear, simple and easy to understand all of this is when you actually want to know the truth instead of parroting the blithering, blathering lies of Trump and his MAGALoons?
Posting here just out of curiosity. Now that it's crystal clear both sides (left or right) are same Epstein clients, will you as an ISG member say "screw politics just focus on getting hot (adult & consenting) ladies"?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3016535]Paying hush money is not a crime.
And what was the crime Trump was trying to conceal? And was he convicted of said crime? The alleged crime you Democratic douches keep trying to refer to is paying hush money which is legal!
The answer to the second question is no, Trump was not convicted of any other crime. The answer to the first question is that Bragg never mentioned until closing arguments what crime Trump was covering up. In the end, he gave out three POSSIBLE crimes and told jurors to pick whichever they wanted.
This comes nowhere close to meeting the beyond a reasonable doubt standard for criminal behavior. Yeah, we think the defendant may have been guilty of one of these crimes and we have had no proof or testimony to back up his guilt of such a crime.
So when you say Bragg convicted charged people like he did Trump, that would mean he went after pols for bookkeeping errors and linked them to alleged crimes. Do you have any other example of that? Of course, you don't.
And the 34 counts were one charge, a bookkeeping entry to conceal a crime, repeated 34 times.
But we know you are lying Loony Tooms! That you want to keep lying about this after Trump gets elected means we need to go after those trying to upend our Democracy by trying to win in the courts versus the election.
What Russiagate showed is you Democratic douches have no respect for election results.[/QUOTE]*sigh*.
Again, I must re-post a link I provided earlier. The one that you clearly did not read.
[B]Debunking 12 Myths About Trumps Conviction.
June 4, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://time.com/6985532/trump-conviction-myths-debunked-essay/[/URL]
[QUOTE][b]Myth:[/b] No one knows what Trump was charged with.
[B]Response:[/b] Trump was charged in a 15-page indictment, handed up by a grand jury, with 34 counts of violating New York Penal Law 175-10 in the first degree, which is a felony. [B]A violation in the first degree occurs when a person falsifies business records with an intent to defraud that includes an intent to commit, aid, or conceal another crime. In addition to the indictment, the Manhattan District Attorney filed a 13-page statement of facts detailing the allegations.[/b]
..........
[B]Myth:[/b] The prosecution didnt tell Trump what he was charged with until closing argument, a violation of due process.
[B]Response:[/b] While the indictment specified each of the checks, invoices, and ledger entries alleged to have been falsified, it did not specify which crime Trump allegedly concealed. A defendant is entitled to fair notice of the crime with which he is charged so that he can effectively defend himself at trial, but New York law does not require this level of specificity in the charging document. [B]New York case law requires that the indictment allege only a general intent to conceal a crime, not an intent to conceal a specific crime.
Nonetheless, prosecutors provided this specificity in a prosecution filing in November 2023, five months before his trial began. In that filing, prosecutors disclosed that the crimes they alleged Trump intended to conceal were violating state and federal campaign finance laws and violating state tax laws.[/b] The court rejected an additional basis offered by the prosecution, falsifying business records outside the Trump organization.
..........
[B]Myth:[/b] There is nothing illegal about paying hush money, and famous people do it all the time.
[B]Response:[/b] Paying hush money itself is not a crime, [b]but it is a crime to falsify business records. And it is a more serious crime to falsify business records with, as in this case, intent to conceal other crimes. These include violations of campaign finance laws, by accepting donations over the legal limit, and violations of tax laws, by inaccurately characterizing the payments as income.[/b][/QUOTE]Now, you are probably champing at the bit to trot out each and every easily debunked myth and lie Trump and his MAGALoons have been floating for years. So before you do, please give cyber-space and posting real estate on this website a break by reading or at least scanning that link where they are likely all addressed and debunked so as not to require me to post these links in their entirety, ads, references, photo captions and all a la MDS.
Thank you.
As a criminal, Trump is obviously an intensely stupid, cognitively impaired one with a unique kind of deep-seated hatred for democracy, free and fair elections.
[B]Nearly half of people convicted of the same crimes as Donald Trump are sent to prison, study finds.[/B]
[URL]https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-felony-convictions-sentencing-prison-b2626096.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]Nearly half of the people convicted of the same crimes as Donald Trump in New York state receive prison time, a new analysis finds.
Forty-two percent of people convicted of falsifying business records in New York in the last decade were sentenced to time in jail or prison, a new study from The New York Times found. In Manhattan specifically, that number is closer to one-third, the outlets analysis showed.[/QUOTE]A misdemeanor conviction for falsifying business records would not have warranted incarceration. And certainly not a mere bookkeeping error.
Therefore, all those other criminals who were sentenced to jail or prison for the same crime as Trump very likely were convicted of a Felony version of it, exactly as was the case with Trump; the business records being falsified in order to cover for or conceal another crime.
But, yeah, probably none of them were pols as stupid and cognitively impaired as self-proclaimed billionaire deadbeat Donald Trump, violating clearly defined election and campaign laws in order to improperly influence, that is, steal, an election.
LOL. And I doubt even the worst of those other convicted and incarcerated criminals were stupid and cognitively impaired enough to repeat the felony 34 times!
There are 2-3 factors that make Trump's justified 34 felony convictions by a jury of his peers in a court of law the result of Trump being a uniquely stupid and cognitively impaired criminal.
He probably should have insisted his attorneys mount a defense on the basis of his uniquely intense stupidity and severe cognitive impairment.
But, yeah, probably none of those other convicted criminals were pols as stupid and cognitively impaired as self-proclaimed billionaire deadbeat Donald Trump, falsifying business records in order to violate clearly defined election and campaign laws in a scheme to improperly influence, steal, an election.
As an aside, I just can't get enough of this video clip of that big, fat, orange, criminal liar getting factchecked in real time by Fed Chairman Powell on his big, fat, orange, criminal lie on a couple of topics that he has spent his entire big, fat, orange, criminal life falsely claiming that he knows anything whatsoever about; building contruction / renovation and money!
Lololol.
Damn! Check it out. Enjoy how his big, fat, orange, criminal, liar voice goes softer when he realizes he's been busted. Similar to when he got busted on international television for lying about "MS-13" being tattooed on that guy's fingers in the photo when any normal person over the age of 9 could clearly see it waa a badly photo-doctored image where the letters were added onto the photo after the fact. Lolol:
[URL]https://youtu.be/7RgYm4s0Fog?si=wTAqQ7IiPPxulaZg[/URL]
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3016525]Be careful what you wish for, the Demoturds don't want the files public.
#1 Scumbag Bubba.
#2 Scumbag Bill Gates.
#3 Leon Black.
#4 Alan Dershowitz of Harvard and OJ Fame.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/23/opinion/epstein-files-fbi-trump.html[/URL][/QUOTE]MDS, do you give a fuck about this at all? I sure as hell do not. Are we supposed to believe that if Trump were doing something illegal with Epstein that Obama and Biden would have let him walk? The constant bringing up of this issue is a squirrel. IMO the same people who put Russiagate in the news, the media and intelligence agencies, are trying to muddy the waters so they are not looked into. Epstein killed himself in 2019. He was charged in 2008. Who is pushing this story so hard and why?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3016645]MDS, do you give a fuck about this at all? I sure as hell do not. Are we supposed to believe that if Trump were doing something illegal with Epstein that Obama and Biden would have let him walk? The constant bringing up of this issue is a squirrel. IMO the same people who put Russiagate in the news, the media and intelligence agencies, are trying to muddy the waters so they are not looked into. Epstein killed himself in 2019. He was charged in 2008. Who is pushing this story so hard and why?[/QUOTE]Do you think with all the Deepstate lawfare against Our Lord and Savior, they just chose to skip going after him for the "only" thing he was really guilty of LMFAO yes.
Scumbags Barry and Joe said hey just let it slide and give him a free pass lolololololol.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3016688]Do you think with all the Deepstate lawfare against Our Lord and Savior, they just chose to skip going after him for the "only" thing he was really guilty of LMFAO yes.
Scumbags Barry and Joe said hey just let it slide and give him a free pass lolololololol.[/QUOTE]The Attorney General Pam Bondi said she had the file on her desk. Was she lying or trying to cover up for Trump? They created this conspiracy now let's see how they handle it.
[QUOTE=DwayneJohnson;3016597]Posting here just out of curiosity. Now that it's crystal clear both sides (left or right) are same Epstein clients, will you as an ISG member say "screw politics just focus on getting hot (adult & consenting) ladies"?[/QUOTE]I can't speak for anyone else, but discussing or debating politics has never interfered with my mission to get Real Sex and Real Blowjobs from hot young ladies.
However, for some wannabe punters who were not already living in a country where access to that end at a more reasonable price was readily available, the political decisions made in 2016 did have a deleterious effect on their ability to travel to more accommodating countries for a couple of precious years of their lives that they will never get back. And one might also argue that political decision has changed International Sex Guide-related travel forever and not for the better.
And the same political decision in 2016 that led directly to that deleterious outcome was made again in 2024 with all evidence suggesting the powers that were again unleashed to fuck up International Sex Guide-related travel are well and surely on that assignment again.
So there is that.
And that being the case, I might argue that the topics on this American Politics forum are even more pertinent to the health and welbeing of the intention of this entire website and our general hobby than any other forum or thread asking if one particular hotel in Pattaya is "girl friendly" or where to get a BJ in Bangkok at a reasonable price.
Just sayin'.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3016737]I can't speak for anyone else, but discussing or debating politics has never interfered with my mission to get Real Sex and Real Blowjobs from hot young ladies.[/QUOTE]Agreed!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3016737]And that being the case, I might argue that the topics on this American Politics forum are even more pertinent to the health and welbeing of the intention of this entire website and our general hobby than any other forum or thread asking if one particular hotel in Pattaya is "girl friendly" or where to get a BJ in Bangkok at a reasonable price.
Just sayin'.[/QUOTE]Especially considering there is a war on in Thailand and the DRGOV is a war with the chicas and their customers in Sosua, Dominican Republic.
Yet in the Dis United States of America when Republicans face the prospects of their particular sexual preferences being revealed they are willing to use the full power of the United States Department of Justice to cover it up.
If Clinton had of just said: [I]I let the ***** suck my dick and wound up busting my nut on her dress because she wouldn't swallow[/I]. Things would have gone so much better for him. Even a Republican cannot fault a man for getting his dick sucked.
The more Trump "succeeds" in his 2nd Trump's Pandemic agenda, the more his Majority Disapproval expands on every issue, even in the demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics site's consensus of their favorite mostly Winger-leaning polls!
On virtually every issue they deem important enough to ask about, Trump is not just a smidgen above 50% Disapprove anymore. He is blowing past 52% even on the issue of Immigration!
I dare say a clear majority of Americans, including the Wingers those RCP polls tend to oversample, would rather personally COOK and SERVE their cats and dogs to Immigrants than to endure the chaotic shit-storm of fascist flexing being done by that big, fat, orange, lying criminal Trump:
[URL]https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating[/URL]
And watch for that Majority Disapproval on the issue of Trump handling Foreign Policy to expand going forward. What with all these new Wars breaking out all over the world and old ones kicking into high gear on Trump's watch.
That emerging Thai-Cambodia War "shouldn't have happened and never would have happened" if Harris, Biden, Obama, Hillary or Bill had been President.
Of course, as we all know, these Wars only happen because the participants see Trump as weak.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3016884]The more Trump "succeeds" in his 2nd Trump's Pandemic agenda, the more his Majority Disapproval expands on every issue, even in the demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics site's consensus of their favorite mostly Winger-leaning polls!
On virtually every issue they deem important enough to ask about, Trump is not just a smidgen above 50% Disapprove anymore. He is blowing past 52% even on the issue of Immigration!
I dare say a clear majority of Americans, including the Wingers those RCP polls tend to oversample, would rather personally COOK and SERVE their cats and dogs to Immigrants than to endure the chaotic shit-storm of fascist flexing being done by that big, fat, orange, lying criminal Trump:
[URL]https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating[/URL]
And watch for that Majority Disapproval on the issue of Trump handling Foreign Policy to expand going forward. What with all these new Wars breaking out all over the world and old ones kicking into high gear on Trump's watch.
That emerging Thai-Cambodia War "shouldn't have happened and never would have happened" if Harris, Biden, Obama, Hillary or Bill had been President.
Of course, as we all know, these Wars only happen because the participants see Trump as weak.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/07/25/exclusive-rep-andy-biggs-entire-world-bending-to-maga-movement/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/transparency-jeffrey-epstein-democrats/2025/07/27/id/1220254/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/07/26/donald-trump-leverages-trade-to-open-ceasefire-talks-between-cambodia-thailand/[/URL]
It's a (MAGA) Mans World you Cucks just get to live in it!!