Everything is wrong with the Democratic Party
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3017633]What is wrong with the one Party that has produced and presided over every Great Economic Recovery, Great Economic Expansion and Historic Jobs Creation of the past 100 years, including the most recent one when Biden-Harris recovered America from the Worst President in USA History's Colossal Economic Disaster and Historic Jobs Losses and turned it into The Envy of the World Economy, and none of the Great Depressions, Great Recessions and Historic Jobs Destruction?
What in the world is WRONG with that Party?!
Why can't they be more like the Republican Party, the party that has produced and presided over every Great Depression, Great Recession and Historic Jobs Losses of the past 100 years, including the most recent one by The Worst President in USA History, Donald J. Trump, and none of the Great Recoveries, Great Economic Expansions and Historic Jobs Creation?
Why oh why? The MAGAs want to know?
And what's with the Dems proposing, fighting for and passing all those now beloved and cherished American programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Unemployment Insurance, The Affordable Care Act, the Chips and Science Act, the Infrastructure Bill, etc, etc, etc, when they controlled the WH, the House and the Senate while the Repubs proposed, fought for and passed nothing under the same circumstances except, oh, stuff like The Big Beautiful Fuck Everybody But Billionaires Act?
Seriously. What is wrong with the Democratic Party and why can't they be more like the Know Nothing, Do Nothing Repub Party?[/QUOTE]It was Pro Salvery in 1865 and it is Pro Slavery in 2025 ala Open borders and Pro Illegal Alien Hispanic Slavery.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2025/07/28/sanctuary-nyc-trans-illegal-alien-appears-court-after-allegedly-raping-boy-public-bathroom/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.truthdig.com/articles/watch-bernie-sanders-the-koch-brothers-would-love-to-open-u-s-borders/[/URL]
Government Corruption at the Highest Level
Hillary, Brennan, and Comey are in deep shit:
O'Reilly interviews John Solomon:
Let's start with the most important person in the investigation, President Obama. What do we know about his participation, or lack thereof, in the Russian collusion story?
"What we know from the evidence that's now public, which we didn't all see years ago, when this began unraveling, is that in late July of 2016, right after Hillary Clinton was cleared in the email case, even though there had just been new evidence surfaced that maybe she had been compromised in her email, they didn't investigate it, they clear her, she makes a pivot. The Russian government intercepts her aides talking about she's approved a plan to fake a Russian scandal, to change the dialogue from her emails to Donald Trump's alleged complicity with Russia. ".
Let me, let me stop you there. So this came out of the, a Russian informant? Is that what.
"The way it's been described by John Durham is it looks like it's a highly classified program of intercepts. So we probably intercepted their intelligence or their people being briefed on intelligence. ".
According to Durham, the special counsel, US Intel intercepted some Russian chat, okay, that said Hillary Clinton knew and wanted a phony story about Donald Trump. Do I have that right?
"That's right. And specifically, specifically to end the conversation about her email scandal, that's the part that's very important. ".
All right, they would divert attention away from it. All right. Now you would have to then see what the intercept was and put it in context in order to condemn Hillary Clinton. So Barack Obama, then what's his participation?
"So that intercept is made by the United States government on July 26,2016. On July 28, just two days later, the CIA director at the time, John Brennan, was so concerned about what the Russians knew and the specificity of it, he decided to brief President Barack Obama directly. Now, that's unusual, because if you thought it was disinformation, you're not going to waste the president's time on it. ".
How do we know that Brennan debriefed Obama on this story?
"We have a record of the meeting on the president's schedule, and then John Brennan comes out of that meeting and writes notes, and we have the direct notes of what John Brennan told the president that John Brennan wrote in his notes. ".
What did he tell Barack Obama?
"That there was foreign intelligence, that Hillary Clinton had personally approved a plan to demonize President Donald Trump by suggesting he was in cahoots with Russia to hijack the 2016 election. That's specifically what they say. ".
What was Obama's reply to what Brennan told him?
"We don't know. Barack Obama's never been questioned, and John Brennan says he doesn't quite recall much about that. ".
Doesn't recall? Where did Brennan say he doesn't recall?
"he was questioned in Congress, I believe, in 2023 by Matt Gates, and he's a little vague on that. There's also some references in the Durham report. They're a little cryptic, and so one of the things we think should be released soon, we're working to get, is the actual transcript of John Durham's eight-hour interview with John Brennan. We think that could be an important piece of evidence. ".
Obviously. Okay. So let's advance the story now. So you've got Brennan debriefing Obama on Russian intercepts that accuse Hillary Clinton of fabricating a story to damage Trump. What happens after President Obama hears that from Brennan?
"In the six-day period that follows that briefing, there's an extraordinary amount of activity. First, an Australian diplomat that has a long relationship with the Clintons. His name is Alexander Downer. He had donated a large amount of Australian tax dollars to the Clinton Foundation, longtime friend of the Clintons. He comes forward and tells the FBI, Oh, I remember this conversation from May, and I think the Trump campaign might have been working with Russia to hack the election, the very storyline that the Russians are actually intercepting, that Hillary Clinton says that's going to be the fake story. He comes forward. Based on that information, the FBI opens to Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
All right, so a friend of the Clintons tells who? The FBI?
"he goes to the FBI. ".
He goes to the FBI.
"Volunteers the report. ".
All right, this is James Comey. He says that he has information that the Russian intercept is bull, that there was a real.
"No, what he's saying is, back in May, he had an interaction with a Trump staffer, I believe it's George Papadopoulos, and he walked away from that conversation thinking that George Papadopoulos might have been hinting. ".
So he's trying to reinforce the validity of the story.
"That's right. ".
So Comey then opens an investigation, right?
"That's right, Pete Strzok, right? That's the agent who does it. ".
And then what happens after that?
"Three days after the investigations open, President Obama convenes a national security meeting in the Situation Room, and there he brings in his top people, John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey. Very important that he's in that meeting. And he orders that a fusion cell be stood up to begin investigating whether Russia is working with Donald Trump or on its own to influence the election. ".
Okay. Let's stop, let's stop there. So Obama convenes a meeting, all right, and what was Clapper, the director of national intelligence? Did he have anything to do with this? Did he contribute anything to this?
"he's part of the effort to set up that fusion cell. He's the top intelligence officer in the land, so he's supervising the project. ".
But his crew intercepted the Russian thing that said his name.
"Probably the CIA did the intercept. Yeah, so one down from him. CIA is one of those agencies that report up to Clapper. The CIA is the one who gets that intercept and then alerts the president. ".
Okay, but Clapper knew about it. Is Clapper refuting it or saying no, it's real? Do we know?
"We don't know. We don't know. ".
Okay, we don't know what Clapper's opinion was.
"Right. ".
So Obama's got all his guys in there and they're all talking about this back and forth. , So far if I were president, I'd have my guys in there too. I would be talking about this, right? Would you?
"I agree. ".
Okay.
"I would. ".
All right. So, so far, we have Brennan, a little nebulous, we have Hillary accused of the mastermind of all this. Then, after the meeting, Comey carries on his investigation, right?
"Yes, sir, he does. ".
Does he come to a conclusion?
"he decides that it is worth, by September, escalating to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the FISA Court, the Special Spy Court in America. ".
So two months before the election, Comey uses this unverified information that's been challenged by the Russian intercept to get warrants to what? Ease drop on the Trump campaign?
"That's right, specifically Carter Page, which would give them a back door into the entire Trump campaign in Russia. So two weeks, two months before, they're spying on the opposition party's campaign. ".
Did Comey ever explain why he used unverified information to get a court-appointed warrant?
"he has said that he thought it met the standards for the FISA warrant. We now know from. ".
Before he met the standards.
"That's right. We now know it didn't meet the standards, right?
Of course, because the whole story's phony.
"That's right. From the beginning. ".
But then Obama, did he step back and let the FBI do what they do, or did he get involved further?
"he stays out of it all the way through the election. Obviously, Donald Trump does the, I think, unthinkable for Democrats. He beats Hillary Clinton. And then there's a very important pivot after that. ".
Okay, well, I'll get to that in a moment. So, from the time he held his cabinet meeting about the Russian collusion accusation, to election day, Barack Obama really didn't have any kind of, he wasn't proactive.
"No, we don't know of any other events, right. ".
All right. He wasn't proactive. You'd have to have a whistleblower come up and say that he did. You know, he was behind it. All right, so after Trump beats Clinton, then Barack Obama swings into some kind of action. What was that?
"Let me give you two other little data points, because I think they're going to be important as we go down this map. I don't want to lose the timeline for people. July 5th is the day that James Comey magically waved his magic wand and said, I'm absolving Hillary Clinton. The FBI doesn't have the right to do that but did it. ".
We all remember.
"And remember what the Russians intercepted, that this was a pivot point, that Hillary wanted to change the conversation from her email scandal to a fake Donald Trump scandal. That same day, July 5th, 2016, the same day she knows James Comey is clearing her, Christopher Steele walks into the FBI with the first version of his dossier. So literally on the exact same day when people look and say, boy, these are some coincidences that are serious, the day that she's getting absolved is the day she starts. The Steele dossier, she's paid for the Steele dossier, Steele walks in, and that process goes through. ".
The circumstantial admittance is overwhelming.
"It's pretty big. ".
Okay.
"One more date. While Obama's sitting present, not doing anything, in September, the intelligence community, James Clapper, James Brennan, all the experts, all 17 intelligence agencies, say, listen, there's some evidence that Russia did the hacking on Hillary Clinton's emails. They're doing some typical countermeasures we normally see, but we do not believe that Vladimir Putin is trying to pick one candidate over the other. That is the assessment of all 17 agencies. So, the belief is, all right, there might have been some normal, funny business that Russia does every time, but they're just trying to sow mischief. They're not trying to pick one candidate over the other. ".
What did Brennan and Clapper say about that consensus? Anything on the record?
"They delivered it. They were the ones who delivered to the president. So at that point, they're backing their community. ".
They didn't dispute it.
"No, not at all. ".
Alright, so then in December, President-elect Trump is gathering his crew, and Barack Obama reinserts himself into this. What does he do?
"There's an incredible moment that occurs just before he gets activated. Over the Thanksgiving holiday, so late November 2016, the intelligence community comes back and said, we think we were right. It is clear that Vladimir Putin didn't try to sway the election towards Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump. In fact, the best evidence of it is what's happened in October. In October of 2016, when most Americans are making up their mind about who they're going to pick, the debates are going on, that's the majority of Americans decide last minute. Vladimir Putin withdrew all of his countermeasures in the United States. He was not trying to drop any more damaging, he had damaging information. ".
Okay, and Obama acknowledges all of this?
"Well, it's briefed, right? It is briefed. So, on the end of the November, the Gang of Eight in Congress is briefed on this, which is our assessment that we gave you and the president in September, appears to be accurate. And the best evidence is that last month of the election, Vladimir Putin pulled out. He had more shots he could have fired at Hillary Clinton. He doesn't fire them. He holds them back. And in fact, he seems resigned in October that he was going to have Hillary Clinton as a president. They briefed that to Congress, and now they're about to brief it to Obama. They're supposed to tell Obama that on December 9th. And a funny thing happens. Obama convenes a meeting on December 5th, approximately, and decides he wants a new intelligence assessment. The one he was about to get, we don't know. We don't know the reason. We don't know. ".
So he wants, he doesn't like this one.
"Yeah, or someone doesn't like this one. That's right. And Congress has already been given the information, so it's kind of odd. ".
How do we know that? How do we know that Obama wanted a new intelligence assessment of Russian collusion?
"In the just declassified House Intelligence Committee report that did a review of this whole episode, there is a specific executive order that the House Intelligence Committee was shown, showing that Barack Obama ordered a new intelligence assessment. ".
A new assessment. Okay, what does that indicate? So maybe he just wanted to be 100% correct, or you know, is there.
"Two possibilities, yeah, two possibilities from the testimony of people that we've been able to read. One is there were people who just didn't like that assessment; they wanted to push the narrative. Donald Trump cheated to win. There are other people when the president hears this other people say, Well, the president's hearing that from some people, he sees the intelligence committee, he's got two different sides of the story. He wants everybody to go back to the drawing board. ".
He wants some clarity.
"Look one more time. Yeah, and that could be a reasonable thing to do. ".
So far, I haven't heard anything about Barack Obama that's going to get him indicted by a federal grand jury. I have heard that Hillary Clinton is in big trouble. Brennan, you would have to have, you know, in the report that you just referred to, which is a majority report, it was written by Republicans, but there was no dissent from the Democrats on the committee, and Schiff was ahead of that. No written dissent at all. Because I had to argue with Cuomo about that. But anyway, what's the most damning evidence against Brennan?
"When he takes over this new assessment, the normal way you do it is you bring all 17 people back to the chair, you get your 17 intelligence agents, let's all come together, and let's give the president the best thing. He doesn't do that. He cuts everybody out of the picture except for the CIA, who he runs, the FBI, who James Comey runs, and the NSA, who's run by a guy named Admiral Mike Rogers, who, by the way, warns President Trump in a meeting during the transition that I think the intelligence community may be spying on you. So be careful, maybe you should move out of New York and go to Washington. Very important moment. He had concerns about what was going on. So, instead of the full assessment, John Brennan brings it down to the two agencies that have been pursuing Trump for the last years, and then Mike Rogers, the NSA guy, and they do a rush job. They pick hand-pick their own people. They don't let the agencies pick their people, and they inject into, to get to the point that they need to, or to get to the part that they ultimately decide on that they're going to flip the conclusion, no, Vladimir Putin really was helping Donald Trump. They have to do two things. ".
So the new assessment that Obama ordered says that all of the other evidence is wrong, that Putin did try to undermine the election.
"That's right, that is correct, that's a 180. ".
Brennan has some debt, looks like he's. Clapper, I don't know if he's got a deficit or not. Do you think he's in trouble?
"Yeah, we don't know yet. Well, listen, he would know what was going on. ".
He had to know what was going on, it's whether he promoted it or not. And then Comey had to what was going on too. Right?
"he definitely. Because he is the guy that wants the Steele dossier put into the ICA, the intelligence assessment. There's only two things in the assessment that, according to the John Durham report and now the House Intelligence Committee report, that leaned into the notion that Vladimir Putin put his finger on the scale for Trump. The first is the Steele dossier. ".
Which was phony.
"It was, and by the way, in December, it was already known to be phony. Right. Christopher Steele's been fired. ".
But he wanted it, Comey wanted it in the record anyway. That's a deficit.
"And Brennan does that. Yeah, that's and Brennan, Brennan pushes his staff Brennan staff tells him we've seen the emails. This would be a disgrace to the intelligence community to put this in an official assessment. It would harm all the other good work, he, he orders it. He says I don't care you're putting it in. ".
All right.
"And then there's one other thing. ".
Let's stop there. Yeah. Right. So it's a lot for the audience to absorb.
"It is. It is. ".
So here's, from what you have just told me, and I'm not challenging any of what you just told me, I think it's 100% accurate. It looks to me like there's not enough to go after Obama at this point.
"Right. ".
There is enough to do after Hillary Clinton.
"Yep. ".
There is enough to go after Brennan.
"Right. ".
Clapper, not enough right now. Comey, there is enough. So it would be.
"Yeah, Comey's got a lot of issues at this point. ".
Hillary, Brennan, and Comey would be the three that you could bring in to a grand jury, a federal grand jury, and say they committed a massive fraud, violating every election law.
"And let me mention something that people say about Barack Obama. It's based on the evidence. And again, this is the contrarian side to that. I could argue that Barack Obama would do what a president would do if there was conflict in front of him. The one thing that Barack Obama, we don't have an answer to. We need to press him. We've tried. He won't give us an answer is after you knew that there was a suspicion that Hillary Clinton was setting this all in motion, and then you're told the FBI has opened up a fusion cell and they're looking at it, why didn't you say something? Are you sure that we're not? He doesn't seem to object to it. That's the one thing, that's the judgment thing. Yeah, I don't know if it's criminal, but it's a judgment question. ".
You're never going to get it, because he'll claim executive privilege if Congress calls him. He'll call on executive privilege if the FBI goes in to try to investigate him.
"That's right. ".
And then the Supreme Court is ruled as in the Trump case that under the executive branch, you got all kinds of powers. Alright, John, very good. And I think we did about as good a job as we could to lay it out to everybody in a very confusing situation where we are right now, and I hope you'll keep in touch with us when you get new stuff. This is an unbelievably important story for the country.
"Tomorrow is going to be the most important day of all the revelations we've had this year, Bill. We should keep an eye on it. I believe it'll be Senator Chuck Grassi will release this classified annex of the Durham report. And in that report, we're going to learn something very important. We're going to learn that the FBI also knew, like Barack Obama, that Hillary had set this fake story in motion, and they decided to proceed with evidence that they knew was coming from Hillary Clinton. That's going to be the first time. It's a very important moment. ".
That's a crime.
"It's important because one other thing, I want to take us just one week ahead, just because I'll leave them at a cliffhanger, but in January, for the first time, Barack Obama does something that a lot of people are deeply concerned about. In fact, an FBI agent wrote personal notes saying how concerned he was about it. After they released the intelligence community assessment that's flip-flopped, the FBI has decided that Mike Flynn, the incoming national security advisor, did nothing wrong. They want to shut the investigation of Mike Flynn down. On the same day that Barack Obama is releasing this new intelligence committee assessment, that does the 180-degree flip, he presides over a meeting at the White House, and at that meeting, they're told the FBI has cleared Mike Flynn, and they sit with Joe Biden and other top aides saying, how can we keep an investigation of Mike Flynn going even though he's not done anything wrong? And they scheme up an idea. They talk about the Logan Act. That wasn't going to be applied, but they talked about it. And they come up with the idea, let's get them to an interview. ".
It's a separate case, though. That'll be a separate case than this.
"It is, but it might be viewed as a continuation of a conspiracy. That's what some people feel. ".
Here is why the country benefitted then.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3017668]You are not in the USA Loony Tooms so there is no us.
This can't really be happening. That extra money those countries are paying us should be making it easier for American Consumers to buy those products. And Child-Care. And gold toilets. And everything we will ever want.
That you care more about Adidas than American tax revenues makes you a traitor.
The NYT is pro-Trump? OMG.
In the context of ideas, the country benefits from noble opposition. [B]When Clinton and Gingrich went at it, the country benefitted.[/b] And now?
[URL]https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/01/speaker-johnson-biden-wasnt-running-the-country/[/URL]
Johnson sought a meeting to address pressing national security concerns and issues related to liquified natural gas (LNG) exports, a significant concern for his constituents in Louisiana. However, he described President Biden as "stunned and surprised" by an executive order the president himself had signed, effectively killing LNG, appearing unaware of its implications.
"Can I ask you a question? I cannot answer this from my constituents in Louisiana," Johnson recalled telling Biden. "Sir, why did you pause LNG exports to Europe? Liquefied natural gas is in great demand by our allies. Why would you do that? Cause you understand we just talked about Ukraine, you understand you are fueling Vladimir Putin's war machine, because they got to get their gas from him. ".
Biden, according to Johnson, was stunned. "I didn't do that," Biden said. Johnson responded, "Mr. President, yes you did. It was an executive order like three weeks ago. " Biden continued to deny that he paused the LNG exports. At that point, Johnson suggested that the president ask the president's secretary to print out the executive order, so the two could read it together.
The conversation seemed to startle both the Speaker and the President, but for different reasons:
In this exchange, Johnson said he realized that Biden was not lying to him. "he genuinely did not know what he had signed," Johnson said. "And I walked out of that meeting with fear and loathing because I thought, "We are in serious troublewho is running the country?" Like, I don't know who put the paper in front of him, but he didn't know. ".
End of link.
So while you are griping Trump might not sell that much energy to Europe, Democrats, the completely incompetent opposition, banned the sale of US LNG to Europe. You Democratic idiots literally made Russia stronger and the USA and Europe weaker. That was your fucking stupid plan?
And what gets me is what was the reason? Some dumb ass position on climate change? Or was it to make the vermin in Louisiana, a red state you know, poorer?
So Trump is trying to push more LNG on Europe and get Europe off Russian gas and your position is what? Windmills? You have no position on anything outside of griping about Trump.[/QUOTE]The country benefitted when Clinton and Grinbitch "went at it" because Clinton won every confrontation and Grinbitch was driven out of office in humiliation by his Repub Party for failing so miserably to thwart and reverse the Great Clinton / Dem Recovery from Reagan / Bush1, Historic Economic Expansion and Historic Jobs Creation that began in the year before Grinbitch and his Congressional Repubs took control and without a single Repub vote in favor of the Dem legislation that made it happen.
1 photos
LOL. And they are probably cooking the books, too, as they said they wanted to do.
[B]The Weirdest GDP Report Ever.
The economy grew 3%, but mainly because imports collapsed. Alas, investment fell too.
July 30, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/opinion/gdp-report-economy-consumers-donald-trump-tariffs-d9879d98[/URL]
[QUOTE]This may be the weirdest GDP report ever. The top line growth number looks good, and the White House naturally touted it. This reverses the 0. 5% decline in GDP in the first quarter, which was largely explained by a surge of imports as businesses tried to front-run the anticipated tariff barrage. [/QUOTE][B]How reliable is the government's economic data? Under Trump, there are real concerns.
March 11, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.npr.org/2025/03/11/nx-s1-5323155/economic-data-reliability-trump-howard-lutnick[/URL]
[B]Cooking the books? Fears Trump could target statisticians if data disappoints.
Proposed rule change could pave way for president to fire economists whose figures prove politically inconvenient.
May 18, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/18/trump-statisticians-economy-figures[/URL]
2 photos
LOL. Your MAGA distraction re the irrelevant dossier bit isn't working.
I will cut all of cyberspace and the text real estate on this website a much needed break from MDS1's, Elvis' and now AH'S desperate attempt to bury important real news by cluttering up this forum with posts of entire volumes of blithering blathering interviews of proven numbskulls and winger editorial nonsense by simply posting the link, which I know everyone is capable of clicking to read ALL of it should you choose to read ALL of it, which would be a very good idea, and perhaps 1-2 pertinent quotes from it, for how your blithering blathering MAGA distraction here isn't working in the real world even with your own MAGA Spokespersons.
[B]Right-leaning podcasters call out the Trump administrations 2016 election claims as a distraction from Jeffrey Epstein.
Hosts of right-leaning online shows have called DNI Tulsi Gabbards report a distraction meant to make Trump supporters stop paying attention to Epstein
July 28, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.mediamatters.org/trumprussia/right-leaning-podcasters-call-out-trump-administrations-2016-election-claims[/URL]
[QUOTE]Following weeks of outrage from right-wing media over the Trump administrations handling of files relating to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard recently declassified multiple documents relating to Russian interference in the 2016 election, arguing they prove a treasonous conspiracy to interfere with the results by Obama administration officials. However, hosts of right-leaning online shows including many who helped promote President Donald Trumps 2024 campaign have argued that Gabbards report and Trumps subsequent rhetoric are a distraction meant to appease the Trump base and change the narrative away from the Epstein case.[/QUOTE]Uh. Your lame MAGA attempts to change the subject back to something that has already been investigated to death and dismissed by a Repub FBI, a Repub Special Council, a Repub DOJ and a Repub Senate while the part of it you also hope to revise in history has well and surely been proven by those same Repub entities isn't working.
4 photos
Oh look. More data showing inflation rates increasing under Trump.
I know this is fake news and not really happening, what with all those Billions and Billins of USD "coming in" from China, Mexico, Canada, etc on just a few items with 'Two Weeks' TACO Trump's Tariffs on them to help all of us buy anything we want including Child-care because, you know, Child-care is Child-care so "winningly" easy and all that.
But just thought I would post this for laughs:
[B]PCE report shows U.S. inflation rose last month as Trump's tariffs boosted some prices.
July 31, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pce-report-today-inflation-june-federal-reserve/[/URL]
And, of course, by the time this is posted America will have even MORE Billions and Billions of USD "coming in" from so many more other countries after 'Two Weeks' TACO Trump's Tariff Historic Tax Increases on the American Working Men and Women Consumers kick in much more fully and across the board.
Gee, I sure hope he doesn't re-jigger, cave, buckle or chicken out on that brilliant plan to deal with the Envy of the World Economic Emergency he inherited from Biden-Harris at the last minute or soon.
Perhaps you should have taken a step back before making the post below
[QUOTE=DCups;3017898]Hey Tooms you shoulda stopped your stupid, misguided narrative here. Schumer, Pelosi, Clintons, Obamas, Newscum, etc. Yeah great leaders who just pad their pockets while getting into yours. You people should be exterminated like the cockroaches you are, you fucking piece of shit![/QUOTE]Retirement not going too well for you the Cups. You are exhibiting a lot of anger towards your fellow citizen up in here. Let's take a look at wha you have in common with Khun Tooms. You both collect social security, you both live outside of the United States of America and you both are [B]International Tricks[/B].
[B]Remember because you collect social security and live outside of the United States of America both of our major MAGA posters up in here hate you![/B]
