Agree, evidence in the narrative sense, not the criminal.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2809087]We don't need the "definitive evidence". No one will ever be prosecuted for this crime. However, this will be yet another nail in the coffin of the Russian narrative in the arbitration case against them.
Not that it matters anyway. They began reducing the flow long before the blasts. By the time of the explosions, the delivery had been halted for weeks.
Evidence or no evidence, Gasprom (Russia) will pay up.[/QUOTE]I guess I could have been clearer about not meaning it in the criminal sense. Rather, as you implied, it presents an inconvenient set of facts for anyone who tries to claim that there's a single undisputed version of events. The pro-Russia crowd will certainly ignore or dismiss any such facts, but that's to be expected.
And facts like these might make a difference in the court of public opinion, especially in Europe. At a minimum it doesn't allow anti-West propaganda to go unchallenged. Anything that helps keep public support for Ukraine on a firm footing will also help keep European politicians in that same camp.
All Russian Orcs are now mandated to use only Mandarin
[QUOTE=Questner;2809405]In case of a counter-retreat by the AFU the Russian Army is planning on to deploy a new Electronic Warfare system that jams all Russian language expletives used by the enemy. Without the expletives the personnel stays in disarray, incapacitated and unable to operate.[/QUOTE]Without being able to use Russian, the Orc stays in disarray, incapacitated and unable to operate.
And, as much as that sucks, just wait until all the Russian women are rounded up and sent off to China. Russian ethnicity is about to be swallowed up by the Han hordes.
Your accusation (re conspiracy theory) is pure projection, nothing more.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2809416]Not only that but two days before the attacks, ships were spotted drinking Russian vodka, and there was a Russian gum wrapper found close to the scene of the explosion. LOL. Are you fucking kidding me?
For those of us who actually use our brains, there is this, [URL]https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/us-lng-exports-both-lifeline-drain-europe-2023-maguire-2022-12-20/[/URL]"This means that the United States will remain the primary supplier of LNG to Europe for at least 2023. This will likely generate even greater revenue for you. S exporters after a record 2022, which totaled $35 billion through September, compared to $8. 3 billion over the same period in 2021, USA Energy Information Administration (EIA) data shows. ".
Thing about conspiracy theories is when the theory results in a participant of the conspiracy theory profiting in the billions, it no longer is conspiracy theory with me but probable fact.
OTOH, the conspiracy theory you buy JM about the Russians destroying their own pipeline results in their losing billions and potential trillions of dollars, and you swallowed it whole. Thing about you JM is when you start calling Russians orcs it is obvious that you are so blind that you will believe the Russians are capable of doing anything even things that make absolutely no economic sense like this.
With this much money at stake, you can make the case USA involvement in this war is not about Democracy or a sovereign nation or whatever but about the USA profiting off of it. We are telling Europe. Don't buy cheap natural gas off the Russians. Buy expensive natural gas from the USA. FWIW, Trump wanted the same damned thing from Europe.[/QUOTE]How sad that you're so reading challenged, since I clearly stated that a single data point of evidence is not conclusive.
Evidence is what it is, and truth is what it is. In this particular case, the evidence is that Russian ships were photographed near the scene of the pipeline explosion four days before the event happened.
What anyone chooses to extrapolate from that data point is up to them. As for me, I'm all about evidence, so I'm happy to wait until more comes to light before making any conclusions. In stark contrast, people like you, to whom evidence is irrelevant, have already chosen their preferred narrative.
BTW, your post is clear evidence that you'd be well-advised to take a remedial reading comprehension course. Poor Elvis has truly left the building. Sorry if the truth gets you "All Shook Up".
Here you go, maybe this will help you feel better about your intellectual and logical deficiencies:
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23zLefwiii4[/URL]
Is it time to coin a new term?
[QUOTE=JohnClayton;2809425]Admin: this account is a bot.[/QUOTE]Along with Putin butt-boys, maybe we should also start using the term Putin butt-bots? Although the latter are created by the former, they're not exactly the same thing.
P. S. The difference between personal opinion and objective fact
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2809416]
when you start calling Russians orcs it is obvious that you are so blind[/QUOTE]My basis for calling the Russians "Orcs" is the extreme depravity they've demonstrated in the commission of numerous atrocities. And those depravity-fueled atrocities have been confirmed by a number of third-party (non-Ukrainian) sources. I make absolutely NO apologies for using what I firmly believe is an accurate description. The term "Orc-hordes," or simply "Orcs," paints a picture that is better than a thousand other words.
However, in stark contrast to many (including you), I have the ability to keep my personal opinions separate from my observations with respect to objective fact (s). So, when I post about a specific piece of evidence, or a specific set of facts, I do my best to stay within the parameters those facts delineate. Also, I am always happy and ready to engage in fact-based debates and discussions. And I've even challenged the narrative-mongers to such debates. The response has either been more narrative or, more often (wait for it), nothing but crickets.
I fully understand what confirmation bias is, and I studiously avoid it. I let the facts shape my view, whereas others (like you) see everything through the lens of their preferred narrative.
Another fine example of projection by you. Blinders much?