Vance must be low eyeliner that day
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3032166]Took me 30 seconds to look this up. Looks like more fake news from Dems.
[URL]https://youtube.com/shorts/taKGlm-xLwA?si=b1vDTpmH1i7hfqlp[/URL][/QUOTE]That's what we see now, MAGA employing commie KGB talking points from Vladimir Putin.
Prepare to be attacked for that message, RD84
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3032488]Elvis, I agree with a lot of your post, especially pink collar jobs for women. It annoys the fuck out of me knowing I could kill anyone I work with bare handed in under 30 seconds, yet sometimes I get bitched out because my job requires almost no physical prowess. In a different time period guys like me, men who trained everyday day for hand to hand combat always ready to defend their friends and family held a lot more respect and appreciation. Now times are safe and dudes just get cast to the side unless they got something somebody wants. Then you get women who act incredibly hard because they push a bunch of paper work and are good at kissing ass and rises through the ranks and get a supervisor position. To be fair, they are good at what they do and they do deserve that position, but it just irks the fuck out of me when they act hard like they are actual physical tough guys. If the jobs required any type of physicality, these same tough girls would be unemployed. Men who have been in real shit know, once you smash someone's face in and they feel their teeth loosen and see stars, the tough guy act goes right out the window. But enough of my crying because I hate my 9 to 5 desk job LOL..[/QUOTE]RD84, that was such a reasonable and by political definition "WOKE" message, the real "WOKENESS" haters here are bound to stand by their many previous post principles and call you out for trying to destroy America for it!
But I for one appreciated it and see no threat to America in your thinking that way and saying so.
Soft boys even from AOC lolol aka Limp Cucks
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3032422]Where does he get off? I just posted in the Medellin section about guys on military pensions griping about regular working Americans flying in and raising the prices of hookers. Man did I strike a nerve. These guys living abroad lectured me on how I as a taxpayer should be grateful to them. It was unAmerican of me to suggest they pay for their own damned hookers. You cannot make this stuff up!
Guys like Kevikev are like women. They think the hardworking American taxpayer is not worthy of their money. No, if you vote for Trump, you are a racist, sexist, xenophobe, or homophobe unworthy of the fruits of your labor in the USA. Hell, you are such scum that you should be grateful that you are allowed to give guys like him your money.
It is the alliance of parasites like women and minorities and pensioners that make up the Democratic party. Check this out, [URL]https://www.amazon.com/Bring-Nothing-Table-Level-Concept/dp/1079400125[/URL]..[/QUOTE]She's referring to the simps that voted for Scumbag Hillary / a 3rd term for Scumbag Bubba and probably a 4th.
And Scumbag Harris.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/10/16/a-nation-of-soft-boys-aoc-lectures-young-men-on-masculinity-at-cnn-townhall/[/URL]
Are Black Americans mentally or culturally disabled?
Brilliant Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson seems inclined to think so. Remember this Justice Jackson was the DEI Supreme Court Woke nominee who could not or would not state what a woman was in her Senate Confirmation Hearing. This is all too amusing and stupid for words. Let the Woke reign down on you!
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydUSZX4Kzzo&t=5s[/URL]
"During a hearing at the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) involving whether Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson seemed to liken black Americans to Americans with disabilities.
The case, known as Louisiana v. Callais, considers whether Louisiana's congressional map which includes two majority-black districts violates the 15th Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
Plaintiffs in the case argue that the congressional map is unconstitutionally gerrymandered based on race.
During the hearing, Justice Jackson seemed to contend that black American voters are equivalent to Americans with physical disabilities. "
"So going back to this discriminatory intent point, I guess I'm thinking of it, of the fact that remedial action absent discriminatory intent is really not a new idea in the civil rights laws. And my kind of paradigmatic example of this is something like the ADA," Jackson said.
She continued:
Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act against the backdrop of a world that was generally not accessible to people with disabilities. And so it was discriminatory in effect because these folks were not able to access these buildings. And it didn't matter whether the person who built the building or the person who owned the building intended for them to be exclusionary; that's irrelevant. Congress said, the facilities have to be made equally open to people with disabilities if readily possible. I guess I don't understand why that's not what's happening here.
The idea in Section 2 is that we are responding to current-day manifestations of past and present decisions that disadvantage minorities and make it so that they don't have equal access to the voting system. Right? They're disabled. In fact, we use the word 'disabled' in Milliken v. Bradley. We say that's a way in which these processes are not equally open. So I don't understand why it matters whether the state intended to do that. What Congress is saying is if it is happening. You got to fix it.
Lawyer Edward Greim responded to Jackson, saying, "The difference is that the remedy under the ADA and other anti-discrimination laws is not stereotype. "
"It's not race-based. I take your point. I take your point. But you're saying then that if the problem of no access is about race, it's just too bad because you can't have a remedy that relates to race," Jackson replied, to which Greim said, "Absolutely not, your honor. "
"It's not whether it relates to race," Greim said. "It's whether the remedy that relates to race involves stereotyping voters and making assumptions about their politics and their views and their thoughts based on their race and that's the problem. It doesn't exist in those other civil rights statutes."
3 photos
She's probably talking about those soft, doughy Young Republican boys
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3032557]She's referring to the simps that voted for Scumbag Hillary / a 3rd term for Scumbag Bubba and probably a 4th.
And Scumbag Harris.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/10/16/a-nation-of-soft-boys-aoc-lectures-young-men-on-masculinity-at-cnn-townhall/[/URL][/QUOTE]By now everyone has seen those soft, doughy, fat, some bearded, snowflake, inferiority complex-ridden, privileged, trust fund babies, Republican boys that got caught trying in vain to boost their understandably extremely low self-esteem by hissing and lisping out limp-dick insults about black people, Jews, how raping women is epic, how much they love Hitler and want to fire up the holocaust death camp ovens and so on. Classic Trump MAGA Repubs.
I think those are the boys she was talking about.
4 photos
Trump's constant bullshitting is not working
Trump's constant lying about his tariffs import tax increases on the American consumer, that he solved all these wars, that no other presidents solved any wars, that Joe Biden was the worst president ever, that he is the greatest, who is responsible for his and his MAGA Repub government shutdown and why and all his other failed misdirection from his horrible economic policy and stewardship results, even with the help of his slavishly obedient White House so-called press corp, is not working to improve his poll numbers, which are still dragging around in the gutter:
[B]Trump's approval rating on the economy takes hit because of shutdown, inflation.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/17/trumps-economic-approval-rating-drops-says-cnbc-survey.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
Seriously, listening to Trump speak is the cringy audio equivalent of watching a 500 pound filthy slob waddle through a restaurant wearing only a diaper, grabbing handfuls of other people's food with his bare hands and pushing half of it into his gaping pie hole and smearing the other half of it onto his face and across his man boobs.
It is a vile and disgusting insult to our senses, engendering as much pity for the carnival freak on embarrassing display as resentment for whoever was stupid enough to allow it to happen.
