Electrostate vs. Petrostate: LCOE for Educational Purposes ONLY!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3048732]LOL. I ask you two questions and you go off on this mental masturbation rant versus just answering them. Fine, I will answer them.[/QUOTE]LOL! Answers or more bullshit? BTW, I don't doubt for a second, that feeble and frustrated minds, like yours, will view LCOE, as ONE BIG masturbation rant, but that's out of my control and not my problem.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3048733]And this is where your LCOE bullshit falls flat on its face...[/QUOTE]Really? 'cause nothing thus far that you've said, quite says ignorance and illiteracy on the subject of LCOE, than you calling it [B]my "LCOE bullshit",[/B] when so many industries, like investment banks, financial advisors, project developers & investors, utility policymakers & planners, government agencies and energy analysts & consultants use LCOE everyday for critical planning and financial decision making.
[U]For Educational Purposes only![/U]
BTW, [NOPARSE]Elvis 2008, view my so called rants, as masturbation all you want to, if that's your thing...LOL! Far be it from me, to judge, what Elvis 2008 loves to view as masturbation ! That Said...
Know this, [/NOPARSE][B]before you continue to embarrass yourself...AGAIN,[/B] with regards to the subject matter of LCOE and understanding what a LCOE is and / or does, perhaps you should take a look at the following 2025 LinkedIn post, from Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF), on the Global Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE).
Scroll down to [U]see a BNEF LCOE benchmarks chart,[/U][NOPARSE] of the $ per megawatt hour from 2020 to 2025 on Nat.Gas, Coal, On/Offshore Wind, Fixed/Tracking Solar and Battery [/NOPARSE]Storage.
[B]BNEF - Future of Energy: Global Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE), benmarks 2020-2025,[/B] 06 February 2025, [URL]https://www.linkedin.com/posts/bloombergnef_renewables-wef26-bloomberghouse-activity-7420452042361458688-djFn[/URL] -OR- [URL]https://uk.linkedin.com/showcase/bloombergnef/?trk=public_post-text[/URL]
So hopefully you don't embarrass yourself to much, but if you prefer masturbating viewpoints, to my so called LCOE rants, then knock yourself out! Here is another report on LCOE for the UK's 28 DFIF countries.
[B]BNEF has examined levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) for major generation technologies across DFIDs 28 priority countries,[/B] 15 November 2015, [URL]https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a0897b40f0b652dd00023e/61646_Levelised-Cost-of-Electricity.pdf[/URL].
Please remember, that while I'm providing LCOE information, [U]it is purely for educational purposes ONLY![/U] I can't control how people choose to use [B](or view it as masturbation, of)[/B] the information!
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: The EU says, 'less gas more LCOE wind turbines, please'
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3049149]And you think you are educating anyone when you say the same thing again and again? LOL. You have had three people give you example after example of when LCOE estimates are off and you are so fucking cocky that you think they are nowhere near as bright as you.[/QUOTE]Despite the dumbass comments on wind turbines by the senile foul-mouth MAGA Fuhrer, at the WC Forum (and similar anti-wind turbine sentiments from ISG-MAGA acolytes), the EU (Britain, Germany, Denmark Norway, Netherlands and other European countries) [NOPARSE]announced they will be signing an agreement to jointly install 100GW of offshore wind turbines, and 20GW by the year 2030, in large scale joint projects.
This agreement will solidify and renews past commitments, to wean themselves off their reliance on Russian gas by 2028 and U.S. gas beyond [/NOPARSE]that. [B]The United Kingdom and Eight European Countries Partner to Build 100GW of Offshore Wind,[/B] January 26,2026. [URL]https://energynews.pro/en/the-united-kingdom-and-eight-european-countries-partner-to-build-100-gw-of-offshore-wind/[/URL]
[QUOTE]According to a separate report, indicates British consumers have enjoyed [b]savings of $1.9 billion (1.6 billion) from the nine existing undersea cables linking the UK to Europe since 2023.[/b][/QUOTE]That's a [I][b]pretty big commitment and billion dollar savings for intermittent power,[/b][/I] for [NOPARSE]100GW offshore wind turbines built and installed jointly, 20GW by 2030 and 300GW by 2050 [/NOPARSE][I]...hmmmm,[/I] I wonder if they checked if, [U]a LCOE "baseload"[/U] was even considered?
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Why does MAGA prefer to play the blame?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3049224]In the real world, alternative energy has failed again when needed most, [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/post-winter-storm-deep-freeze-pushes-power-grids-brink-feds-move-avert-blackouts[/URL].
Golf clap for fossil fuels saving the grid from collapse. It wasn't solar or wind. It was oil and natural gas.
Meantime in New England and Boston oil. Yes OIL. Is a stunning 39% of electricity production. ...
You have that huge natural gas field in Pennsylvania, and the obvious source of cheap electricity and New England and the libs who run it tried to go with solar and wind. LOL. That fell on its face with this winter storm and they had to go back to oil and wood. Unfuckingreal.[/QUOTE]It's always so freakin' hilarious, how you and the fossil fuel fool that wrote the article, always somehow end up blaming renewables, wind and solar, for every electrical failure, one weather disaster after another. LOL! I'm still laughing at the Texas fools, that were blaming wind turbines, for they own ineptitude and lack of preparedness, in the 2021 winter storm. [URL]https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/19/politics/texas-energy-outage-wind-turbine-blame-green-energy-fact-check[/URL]
And what's even funnier, is that, neither you nor he, can do basic 5th grade math. Meaning, when fossil fuels supply the bulk or 60% of [I]U.S. National grid's power,[/I] how the freakin' hell can you squarely blame renewables (solar and wind), that only supply 15% the power to the electrical grid, with the short comings and failures of the recent winter storm?
Do the math and any half-witted 5th grade student, will tell you, if there is blame, that fossils fuels deserves most of the bulk, or majority of the blame. But as I suspect, most gullible MAGAs may have failed 5th grade math.
But dude, don't get it twisted! Unlike you, I won't blame fossil fuels, as the consensus is reporting that, the blame and failures, lay squarely on, downed, frozen and outted power lines and not having a more resilient, robust and balanced electrical grid system.
[B]Winter storm tests US electric grid as outages spread[/B], January 26,2025. [URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/25/winter-storm-electric-grid-overdrive-00745690?[/URL] [B]Winter Storms Are Straining the U.S. Electric Grid[/B] January 26,2025. [URL]https://nzero.com/blog/winter-storms-are-straining-the-u-s-electric-grid/[/URL]
But by all means, blame 15% solar and wind, if it makes you and your MAGA Fuhrer, feel better about the inept administration's handling of the winters storms and his cancellation of wind farms, that would provide additional clean power.
So MAGA, rather than playing the blame game, perhaps you should for once, try "administrating" and "governing", thereby, fixing the real problems with the [I]U.S.electrical grid?[/I]