American Politics

[QUOTE=Canada;3061388]Biden only created DEI government jobs. Trump is slowly getting rid of all the jobs Biden created and is creating real jobs in the private sector. Do your homework. Biden was a total failure. Everyone knows it. Even the democrats still in congress know it. He is blackballed by his own party. No Democrat wants Biden campaigning with him or endorsing them. Biden wasn't creating any economy or jobs. The auto pen did all his work. He is and was an embarrassment to the democrats.[/QUOTE]The USA Bureau of Labor Statistics that provided the numbers for that graph I posted showing jobs creation roaring and soaring under Biden way beyond that of Trump or any other Repub in the past 100 years or so knows the difference between government jobs and private payroll / private-sector jobs.

That graph was only about private payroll / private-sector jobs, not government jobs. And by golly I think I'll post it again below so you won't even need to go searching for it.

Here's the AI Overview for meaning of those terms. Your homework assignment is to study what it says so someday you might know the difference as well as a typical black female military veteran government employee does:

[QUOTE]USA BLS Private Payroll Jobs (Total Private Employment) is a key metric from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) tracking the monthly change in employees on non-farm, [b]private-sector business payrolls.[/b] It covers roughly 85% of total nonfarm employees (excluding government, farms, and non-profits) and is used to measure private-sector economic growth and hiring trends.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (.gov)
Bureau of Labor Statistics (.gov)[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Canada;3061388]Biden only created DEI government jobs. Trump is slowly getting rid of all the jobs Biden created and is creating real jobs in the private sector. Do your homework. Biden was a total failure. Everyone knows it. Even the democrats still in congress know it. He is blackballed by his own party. No Democrat wants Biden campaigning with him or endorsing them. Biden wasn't creating any economy or jobs. The auto pen did all his work. He is and was an embarrassment to the democrats.[/QUOTE]The homework has been done. Let's compare notes.

Biden created 16 million jobs over four years — the first administration in recorded history to add jobs every single month. Of those, 89% were private sector jobs according to PolitiFact, which rated the "DEI government jobs" claim false. The S&P 500 rose 57.8% during his term. Corporate profits hit record highs every single year.

The fair criticism is that roughly 72% of those jobs were pandemic recovery rather than new creation — a legitimate point. But that's a very different claim from "only DEI government jobs."

As for Trump "creating real jobs in the private sector" — current inflation is at 3. 3%, the highest since May 2024, driven by an Iran war his administration started and tariffs his own Supreme Court appointees ruled unconstitutional. The jobs picture going forward is worth watching closely.

"Everyone knows it" is not a data point. It's just a louder way of saying nothing.

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3061378]Unlike you and Tokyo Rose spewing lies 24/7.

Or that mean girls vagina Elvis spreading unprovable rumors about Our Lord and Savior.

Just don't say anything about her ghetto ass Colombian puta novia or their trick baby (she will blow the mod to remove your comments that hurt her feelings).

I guess I'm what they call down there in Texas as a straight shooter.

I believe in Karma, John McCain hated Americans and was a traitor ala the Gang of 8 and the Keating 5, brain cancer was too kind to him.

Ben Sasse is a traitor and Karma is serving him up some sweet ass justice as well!

You mention you like JD Vance? I thought you hated him?

Do you now think he's owned by King POS Libertarian Elon?

My wish is for DJT for 8 more yrs.

DJT Jr 2028-2036 with Stephen Miller as VP then Stephen Miller 2036-2044.
[/QUOTE]From what I've seen, Elvis has treated you only with kindness and respect here. If he flew off the handle you must have provoked it. Also please don't refer to him with feminine pronouns. Not only does it make you look woke, but that was my idea, reserved only for you Marquesa. You look like a copycat.

You're a rare breed, a MAGA Socialist. The only other one I know of is Steve Bannon. You must reach out to others or you'll be all alone. I'll make it easy. Please buy this, read it, and implement it in your everyday life:

[URL]https://www.amazon.com/How-Win-Friends-Influence-People/dp/0671027034[/URL]

And what's the deal with people with cancer? Every time somebody comes down with cancer, like John McCain or Ben Sasse, you want him dead ASAP. Someone in your past, maybe a parent or other loved one, must have died from cancer. And that left you feeling abandoned and alone. You have to come to terms with that if you're ever going to be happy and fulfilled. The Church of Tiny is here to help. You only need to ask.

[QUOTE=Canada;3061384]He is still 100% better than Biden or Obama so are really making Biden and Obama look bad.[/QUOTE]Obama and Joe Biden did not bed Qatar for a hand me down 20 year old plane that Trump is haven't the US taxpayers retrofit as Air Force One and gift to him when he leaves office? Who does that? How is Trump making Obama and Biden look bad? You lost me when you made that leap.

Why did we pay for JD Vance to campaign for Orban in Hungary? What happened with the war against government waste. How did Trump's "endorsement" work out for Orban? Like, Duterte ofbthe Philippines someone is going get a one way ticket to The Hague!

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3061378]Or that mean girls vagina Elvis spreading unprovable rumors about Our Lord and Savior.

Just don't say anything about her ghetto ass Colombian puta novia or their trick baby (she will blow the mod to remove your comments that hurt her feelings).[/QUOTE]You got this bug up your ass and out of the blue you mentioned how you would reject my woman if she were made available to you which she is not. I do not know why you did that. Maybe you got rejected by a woman, but why don't you follow that up with how you would not have Morgan Fairchild or Marilyn Monroe as a GF because you do not like blondes?

Your reason for your "rejection" of my gal was that you do not like Colombians and then you posted you liked not blacks or Asians but Venezuelans! You cannot make up such stupid posts, but you went one better and started talking about your Colombian exploits. WTF is wrong with you?

Of course, you know nothing about her outside of what I have shared, and the only reason for your comment is because I have her, and you desperately want to think that you are better than me. That is pure, unadulterated narcissism. You and Trump have that in common!

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3061378]I guess I'm what they call down there in Texas as a straight shooter.[/QUOTE]Ha! I repeat that you know nothing about my woman or her kid. You are a complete bullshit artist or as we would say in Texas, "All hat and no cattle".

And I didn't contact the mod to delete your envious and pointless posts. The mod did that on his own. In your screwed up head, you believe that the only person who could find your posts stupid and pointless was me.

[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3061378]Do you now think he's owned by King POS Libertarian Elon?

My wish is for DJT for 8 more yrs.

DJT Jr 2028-2036 with Stephen Miller as VP then Stephen Miller 2036-2044.
[/QUOTE]Yeah, well, that says a lot about you. Trump has been out of hand with his impulsiveness, and he is hurting a lot of people because of it. That you are ignorant of the harm he has done speaks volumes about why you really like him. It is not his policies but your desire to be him that is driving you lack of sensitivity to the pain of others.

[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]

[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted because it contributed nothing of value and in fact constituted a complete waste of bandwidth.

The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange if information between men on the subject of finding women for sex. Let's stick to the subject.[/blue]

[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061294]No. You've been touting EV cars, as well as electric coal mining trucks, ad nauseum. And presumably you believe the electricity to charge the vehicles should come from renewables. So I will not provide you with "data, information and numbers" about the "electrification of SA's electrical grid" instead of data about SA's total energy consumption.[/QUOTE]Meaningless!

[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061294]I shouldn't provide you with links period. I'm not your personal slave. If you see something I wrote that's wrong, correct it, like when you pointed out that baseload power in South Australia doesn't apply. But, ONE MORE TIME, here's a link for total energy consumption, from the official scorekeeper:

[URL]https://www.energy.gov.au/publications/australian-energy-update-2025[/URL] [/QUOTE]Again, meaningless! Try using consumption per capita, that has any real meaning. [URL]https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/energy-consumption-by-country[/URL].

I hate to break it to you BTW, but Australia's AEOM doesn't believe they have "baseload" power in SA.

And get back to me when you realize that the Australia's grid is at +41% renewables and America's is only at 26%, regardless of total consumption. The grid comparisons remain intact.

[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060653]From ChatGPT, here's South Australia's total energy consumption by source...[/QUOTE]Try taking your own advice, why don't you?

Oh BTW, so while you were doling out the typical obsequious and arrogant schooling of your fellow MAGA tribesman, Canada, when telling him:[LIST][I][b]"You just don't get how things work around here Canada. What you need to do is find a link to the Guardian or the New York Times or ProPublica...",[/b][/I] [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3060182&viewfull=1#post3060182[/URL][/LIST]It would seem, you forgot your own golden rule and didn't tell your "cut-and-paste" ChatGOP, [U]to provide the link,[/U] from whatever MAGA right-wing publication it used.

So before you go telling others, [U]to provide a link,[/U] perhaps try following your own advice and "golden rules" and provide a link, with your so called [I]"Courtesy of ChatGOP"[/I] info and posts? Or are you above following your own advice?

[QUOTE=FutureDeadGuy;3061460]The homework has been done. Let's compare notes.

Biden created 16 million jobs over four years the first administration in recorded history to add jobs every single month. Of those, 89% were private sector jobs according to PolitiFact, which rated the "DEI government jobs" claim false. The S&P 500 rose 57.8% during his term. Corporate profits hit record highs every single year.

The fair criticism is that roughly 72% of those jobs were pandemic recovery rather than new creation a legitimate point. But that's a very different claim from "only DEI government jobs."

As for Trump "creating real jobs in the private sector" current inflation is at 3. 3%, the highest since May 2024, driven by an Iran war his administration started and tariffs his own Supreme Court appointees ruled unconstitutional. The jobs picture going forward is worth watching closely..[/QUOTE]I don't believe it. Show me proof because everything I Google proves you wrong. Inflation is not 3.3 %. He did not create 16 million jobs. Only jobs he created were far too many DEI government jobs that need to be phased out. Most of the jobs added were people returning to their jobs after Covid. Not sure why you keep making false statements about Biden presidency. Everyone in the USA experienced it. It was a disaster. Obviously you were not living in USA or you would have seen it every day. See link.

[URL]https://budget.house.gov/press-release/fact-check-biden-misleads-on-job-creation-statistics[/URL]

[QUOTE=EihTooms;3061459]The USA Bureau of Labor Statistics that provided the numbers for that graph I posted showing jobs creation roaring and soaring under Biden way beyond that of Trump or any other Repub in the past 100 years or so knows the difference between government jobs and private payroll / private-sector jobs.

That graph was only about private payroll / private-sector jobs, not government jobs. And by golly I think I'll post it again below so you won't even need to go searching for it.

Here's the AI Overview for meaning of those terms. Your homework assignment is to study what it says so someday you might know the difference as well as a typical black female military veteran government employee does:[/QUOTE][URL]

https://budget.house.gov/press-release/fact-check-biden-misleads-on-job-creation-statistics[/URL]

[QUOTE=Sirioja;3061448]I don t think USA are a real democracy under Trump, many and in his family telling he is now under dementia, telling white today and black tomorrow, just senile, when many lost jobs since 1 year and half and now inflation because of his lies and craziness.[/QUOTE]Show me the jobs lost under Trump. You can't because the economy is booming and companies are hiring record number of employees. Only jobs lost are in New York, CA and Illinois. Jobs moving to Texas, Florida, Tennessee. All because of woke liberal and socialist crap.

[QUOTE=Canada;3060028]6 weeks ago gas was $2.00 to $2.20 a gallon in Wyoming, Oklahoma and Arizona. I filled up in Arizona at $2.20. Oklahoma had some stations at $1.99. It was on the national news as cheapest gas in USA. CA was averaging $4.89 at the same period so double. CA is usually $2. 00 above USA average. Canada was about $4.00 a gallon.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060182]You just don't get how things work around here Canada. What you need to do is find a link to the Guardian or the New York Times or ProPublica that says the price of gasoline was $2.20 in Arizona and $1.99 in Oklahoma. Until you do that nobody around here is going to take you seriously.[/QUOTE]Canada, My reply to your post WAS satire, directed at the usual suspects, not at you. Obviously the Guardian, New York Times, and ProPublica are not going to provide gasoline prices in Wyoming or Oklahoma from 6 weeks ago.

[QUOTE=Spidy;3061496]Try taking your own advice, why don't you?

Oh BTW, so while you were doling out the typical obsequious and arrogant schooling of your fellow MAGA tribesman, Canada, when telling him:[LIST][I][b]"You just don't get how things work around here Canada. What you need to do is find a link to the Guardian or the New York Times or ProPublica...",[/b][/I] [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3060182&viewfull=1#post3060182[/URL][/LIST]It would seem, you forgot your own golden rule and didn't tell your "cut-and-paste" ChatGOP, [U]to provide the link,[/U] from whatever MAGA right-wing publication it used.

So before you go telling others, [U]to provide a link,[/U] perhaps try following your own advice and "golden rules" and provide a link, with your so called [I]"Courtesy of ChatGOP"[/I] info and posts? Or are you above following your own advice?[/QUOTE]I can't recall ever asking for a link from anyone here, except of course from Canada.

[QUOTE=Spidy;3061495]

I hate to break it to you BTW, but Australia's AEOM doesn't believe they have "baseload" power in SA.[/QUOTE]

I hate to break it to you BTW, but I already conceded that:

[QUOTE=Tiny 12;3061294]I shouldn't provide you with links period. I'm not your personal slave.[b] If you see something I wrote that's wrong, correct it, like when you pointed out that baseload power in South Australia doesn't apply.[/b][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Spidy;3061495]Again, meaningless! Try using consumption per capita, that has any real meaning. [URL]https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/energy-consumption-by-country...[/URL].


And get back to me when you realize that the Australia's grid is at +41% renewables and America's is only at 26%, regardless of total consumption. The grid comparisons remain intact.[/QUOTE]Hilarious! Your link shows per capita energy consumption for the USA at 265.85 GJ and for Australia at 204.77 GJ.

However, Australia's the 15th biggest per capita emitter of CO2, at 14.21 tons, compared to 13.83 tons for the USA:

[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions_per_capita[/URL]

In other words, per capita, the USA consumes more energy but emits less CO2 than Australia. Why? I bet it's because of natural gas in the USA! I suspect if Australian had devoted 10% of the resources to gas pipelines as it devoted to renewables, its CO2 emissions would be a lot lower. Australia has huge deposits of natural gas offshore Western Australia and the Northern Territory, but no way to get it to the big cities in the southeast. So, in addition to renewables, it relies on coal, which emits more CO2 per BTU than natural gas.

[QUOTE=FutureDeadGuy;3061460]The homework has been done. Let's compare notes.

Biden created 16 million jobs over four years the first administration in recorded history to add jobs every single month. Of those, 89% were private sector jobs according to PolitiFact, which rated the "DEI government jobs" claim false. The S&P 500 rose 57.8% during his term. Corporate profits hit record highs every single year.

The fair criticism is that roughly 72% of those jobs were pandemic recovery rather than new creation a legitimate point. But that's a very different claim from "only DEI government jobs."

As for Trump "creating real jobs in the private sector" current inflation is at 3. 3%, the highest since May 2024, driven by an Iran war his administration started and tariffs his own Supreme Court appointees ruled unconstitutional. The jobs picture going forward is worth watching closely.

"Everyone knows it" is not a data point. It's just a louder way of saying nothing.[/QUOTE][URL]https://budget.house.gov/press-release/fact-check-biden-misleads-on-job-creation-statistics[/URL]

[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061520]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ons_per_capita

In other words, per capita, the USA consumes more energy but emits less CO2 than Australia[/QUOTE]LOL! Barely, as [I]the U.S.[/I] is like 16th, right after Australia at 15th. So big deal, not really much of a difference.

Once again, my posts are being dropped by Admin, so I'll post again the comparison of energy consumption and CO2, I originally was trying to make between the USA and China.

[B]Dropped Post:[/B]

[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060653]From ChatGPT, here's South Australia's total energy consumption by source...[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060721]Now Australia is the new shining star of what to be? LOL. You need to follow the news better.
[URL]https://ieefa.org/resources/its-time-australia-reduce-its-oil-demand[/URL] [/QUOTE]BTW, just presenting a country's energy (or prime energy) consumption, is pretty meaningless, on it own. A country's energy consumption, is more meaningful, when you look at the consumption / CO2 per capita, [URL]https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/energy-consumption-by-country[/URL] and [URL]https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-per-capita/[/URL] (as of 2024). The [I]U.S. a country 4x[/I] smaller than China (by population), for example, has an energy consumption per capita of [I]about 2.3x larger[/I].

[B]End of Dropped Post:[/B]

[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061520]In other words, per capita, the [b][u]USA consumes more energy but emits less CO2[/u][/b] than Australia. Why? I bet it's because of natural gas in the USA![/QUOTE]But allow me to add some sanitary reasoning, to your last post, since you still seem to think, total energy is somehow meaningful, without the proper context.

Using your own asinine and misplaced logic, does that mean, that when China emits more energy, but emits less CO2 (27th), than [I]the U.S. (16th),[/I] that it is because of the tons of dirty "beautiful clean coal" being burnt in China? [I]This is the absurdity of your logic...Duh![/I].

This is AGAIN, why I choose to use, a comparison of electricity grids for a proper decarbonization comparison. [URL]https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/01/13/australia-adds-7-gw-of-renewables-in-2025-stays-on-track-for-2030-target[/URL].