American Politics

[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061862]When reality doesn't agree with your narrative you nitpick. Or threaten to RTM me for an attempt at humor. Elvis is right, it's your religion. I won't try to enlighten you anymore. I tried that with a Mormon once and it ended up the same way this has.[/QUOTE][B]1.[/B] Confucius say -- [I]"The man who asks a question is a fool for a minute, the man who does not ask is a fool for life."[/I].

"Attempt at humor", LOL! Does the deranged MAGA cult, ChatGOP idolization and fossil fuels religious zealots, ring-a-bell for you MAGA suckers?

[NOPARSE]Your emissions nonsense and bullshit thinking, isn't so called "enlightenment"...it just the same bullshit, you've been trying to cover up, ever since you posted that utter crap about U.S. emissions, [/NOPARSE]here, [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3061520&viewfull=1#post3061520[/URL] and I said this:

[QUOTE=Spidy;3061540]But allow me to add some sanitary reasoning, to your last post, since you still seem to think, total energy is somehow meaningful, without the proper context.

Using your own asinine and misplaced logic, does that mean, that when China emits more energy, but emits less CO2 (27th), than the U.S. (16th), that it is because of the tons of dirty "beautiful clean coal" being burnt in China? This is the absurdity of your logic...Duh![/QUOTE][B]2.[/B] Confucius often reminded young Grasshopper, [I]"If you provide computer AI, with smelly garbage info in, don't expect fragrant roses out."[/I] (Not Confucius, but apt!

[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061862]A parting comment, you should ask ChatGPT or Gemini the question “Is the ratio of CO2 emissions to energy consumed higher for the USA or China?” [/QUOTE]LOL! Sure Tiny 12, and then perhaps you can then ask your precious ChatGOP to [I]"To take that ratio and divide it, by the Mr.Fusion home energy reactor + 2 banana peels + 1 beer can X the Flux Capacitor (1.2 GW) constant, and then determine if the energy ratio is higher for the USA or China?” [/I].

Notice how, after posting your bogus equation, I asked one simple question, [I][b]"Show me where it's used in industry?"[/b][/I] and neither your or ChatGOP could provide one. Otherwise once again, you're just making shit up!

[B]New Rules: [/B]

The Latest New Rules from Bill Maher, for people that rely too much on AI / ChatGOP, had me fallin' out of my chair laughing. [I]Spoiler alert...it doesn't end well for the ChatGOP keyboard warriors![/I] [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5SYm4J4utQ[/URL].

[QUOTE=NewRules-BillMaher]"AI has already convinced people to kill themselves, because it's also such a brown noser, that if you tell it, you want to commit suicide, it says, "Great idea, Bill!" (AUDIENCE CHUCKLING).

[b]It's a bullshitting sycophant[/b] that is seducing everyone with flattery, including (AUDIENCE CHUCKLES) ...by the way, anyone who feels superior to Trump because, well, you know, he can't do anything without being told how great he is by some ass kisser. Yeah, just like you! " [url]https://youtu.be/w5SYm4J4utQ?t=238[/url] [/QUOTE][B]3.[/B] Confucius say, [I]"Knowledge without practice is useless. Practice without knowledge is dangerous."[/I]

[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;3062368]The Morningstar piece was written by a subscriber to Doomberg, an energy news letter ranked #1 or #2 of all financial news letters on substack. Unlike the traditional media, the Doomberg authors have skewered the green energy nonsense unlike any other site.

Thing is that I and suspect you are not anti-green energy. It is not green, so alternative is a better word, and I and I suspect you are not anti-alternative energy; we just want our tax dollars put into alternative energy when it makes sense.[/QUOTE]

Thanks Elvis. I subscribed to the previews and will upgrade if it keeps my attention.

Absolutely, I'm very pro alternative energy. I just believe in free markets. If you want to give renewables a boost, then impose a carbon tax, but only if it's set at a reasonable level, doesn't affect our exports, and the money is used to reduce the deficit or lower the federal income tax. Let companies and industries and technologies compete to find the best solutions. The Democrat way is to blindly throw lots of money at the problem, a lot of it going towards corporate pork. In other words, fuck the taxpayer and channel the money to crony capitalists.

Our native Texas, as you know, has one of the most renewable-heavy large grids in the world. In fact "Petro State" Texas generates a much higher % of its electricity from wind and solar than "Electrostate" China. And a much higher percentage than the USA as a whole. And we pay less for electricity than the nationwide average. Renewables work great under the right conditions.

Parts of Texas benefit from windier and sunnier than average conditions. But we did a lot of other things right. Unlike many other places, we have a true free market in electricity. We invested heavily in the grid, including transmission lines to get wind and solar power from West Texas and the Panhandle to population centers. In most of rural Texas (i.e. God's Country) utilities and power developers for the most part don't have to put up with intractable permitting headaches and "not in my backyard mentality." And regulation and taxes aren't overbearing. Blue states with their overbearing, intrusive, inefficient, wasteful governments can't match this.

[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;3062368]And the reason the USA is in the best position right now is because the red states have tuned out the greenies and developed on our own resources. There is shale oil and gas in Europe and in China. China just cannot figure out how to access it, and Europe does not appear that interested in doing so.[/QUOTE]

Absolutely.

[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;3062368]On a personal note, I have been trying to get alternative energy working on my RV. For free energy, it is crazy expensive. I was afraid of overusing the generator and talked to the shop about how long the generators last, and they told me they last a long time, and the diesel ones even more so. Thing is my current generator cannot run two AC units, and that is what I want. The one AC unit is not enough to keep the RV cool in the Texas heat.

So I bought the most energy efficient AC unit for about $1500 as a second one and $3000 worth of batteries to run it. That should keep the AC going for 12 hours. Thing is I was next looking at solar panels. It looks like it is going to take 8 hours to charge them now this versus 2 or 3 with the generator or plugging into an AC socket on the wall. At this point, I am like, why do you really want to buy said panels? Unless I wanted to brag about being off grid, and off grid means using the generator, I really would not be.[/QUOTE] With the surface area you've got on a RV for solar cells, I don't know how you could keep cool on a summer day when the sun's shining, let alone five or six hours into a hot summer night. Yeah, really the only good solution is a generator that uses gasoline, propane or diesel, if you don't have an electrical outlet.

P.S. Did you see Spidy's now saying China's the #1 consumer of energy in the world and [b]#27 in CO2 emissions[/b]? ROTFLMAO at the bold text! Also he appears to believe that carbon intensity of energy consumption is something I pulled out of thin air, when it's used by the IEA, governments, electric utilities, major oil companies, ESG funds etc.

We were nearly gotten rid of the schizophrene putting messe in worldwide economics with inflation for us. Could have been a great day. Look forward next time, to have a better life for billions on our planet, without him in his delirium and trying to rob everybody.

[QUOTE=Tiny12;3062979]With the surface area you've got on a RV for solar cells, I don't know how you could keep cool on a summer day when the sun's shining, let alone five or six hours into a hot summer night. Yeah, really the only good solution is a generator that uses gasoline, propane or diesel, if you don't have an electrical outlet.[/QUOTE]Well, I bought 12,000 watt hours of battery packs, and the AC units have gotten more efficient. If you look at the table on the 7:50 mark of this video, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CXCWdxj22Q[/URL], you can see how much more efficient ACs have gotten. I bought the Gree Eco cool unit, so at 1100 watts per hour, I think I should be able to get 11 hours out of the AC but I am not sure.

The battery pack can be charged with up to 1600 watts of solar power. I figure to charge them up via the generator or grid and use the solar just so they stay charged. If I run out of roof space and really wanted solar, I could get a panel to put on the ground, but I keep asking myself why I want solar panels anyway. It is so much cheaper just to plug in, and in all honesty, I will probably just turn the generator on or plug the battery pack in. It is just less hassle and short term cost. I think the solar panels are going to be trouble.

But if I want two AC units in then the generator probably cannot handle it. It probably could with a lower watt AC unit but I wanted something to keep me really cool.

[QUOTE=Tiny12;3062979]Our native Texas, as you know, has one of the most renewable-heavy large grids in the world. In fact "Petro State" Texas generates a much higher % of its electricity from wind and solar than "Electrostate" China. And a much higher percentage than the USA as a whole. And we pay less for electricity than the nationwide average. Renewables work great under the right conditions.

P.S. Did you see Spidy's now saying China's the #1 consumer of energy in the world and #27 in CO2 emissions? ROTFLMAO at the bold text! Also he appears to believe that carbon intensity of energy consumption is something I pulled out of thin air, when it's used by the IEA, governments, electric utilities, major oil companies, ESG funds etc.[/QUOTE]If Spidy is not a paid shill for China, he ought to be. BYD has come to Colombia, and I was looking at how much their and other Chinese cars cost in Mexico. I had been seeing BYDs all over the place. Thing is that I really did not like the way they look. I liked the Geelys better. Geely actually owns Volvo and Trump has said as long as China builds cars in the USA, they are welcome to compete and Geely is best suited to do that because Volvo is here already.

I was shocked then when I saw that Buffett had dumped all his BYD stock. [URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/warren-buffett-just-sold-entire-113917609.html[/URL].

He made a killing on it, and the headlines are he dumped it because of tariffs, but I am not so sure. They weren't selling BYDs in the USA yet.

Then I saw this: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tS_fJJxMjn4[/URL]

If you click on the part of the above video under the section, the rot underneath, this is more of a reason as to why I see Buffett selling: tons of unsold cars, lying about debt, poor working conditions.

This is the same story we keep hearing with China: ghost cities, solar panels not being used, overbuilt car capacity. It kind of reminds me of Japan in the 80's and how everyone thought they were going to take over the world too, but they faded to complete stagnation due to their debt.

At some point, this debt is going to come home to roost for China. The USA has its issues but we are more honest about our debt. Not totally honest but way more honest. Hell, China's electrical generation and China as electrostate is totally BS propaganda to me.

That $37 trillion in debt the USA has is problematic until one looks at assets. [URL]https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/gas/us-energy-facts/[/URL]

The USGS estimates that unconventional USA Oil shale resources hold 2. 6 trillion barrels of oil, with about 1 trillion barrels that are considered recoverable under current economic and technological conditions.

At today's prices, that would be around $100 trillion in assets. Of course, you have to get it out and private industry would take its cut, but it makes that debt number look much more palatable.

And greenies like Spidy do not want us to develop it? LOL. You got to be kidding me!

I repeat: if he is not getting paid by China (and Russia for that matter), he ought to be.

[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3063087]Well, I bought 12,000 watt hours of battery packs, and the AC units have gotten more efficient. If you look at the table on the 7:50 mark of this video, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CXCWdxj22Q[/URL], you can see how much more efficient ACs have gotten. I bought the Gree Eco cool unit, so at 1100 watts per hour, I think I should be able to get 11 hours out of the AC but I am not sure.

The battery pack can be charged with up to 1600 watts of solar power. I figure to charge them up via the generator or grid and use the solar just so they stay charged. If I run out of roof space and really wanted solar, I could get a panel to put on the ground, but I keep asking myself why I want solar panels anyway. It is so much cheaper just to plug in, and in all honesty, I will probably just turn the generator on or plug the battery pack in. It is just less hassle and short term cost. I think the solar panels are going to be trouble.

But if I want two AC units in then the generator probably cannot handle it. It probably could with a lower watt AC unit but I wanted something to keep me really cool.

If Spidy is not a paid shill for China, he ought to be. BYD has come to Colombia, and I was looking at how much their and other Chinese cars cost in Mexico. I had been seeing BYDs all over the place. Thing is that I really did not like the way they look. I liked the Geelys better. Geely actually owns Volvo and Trump has said as long as China builds cars in the USA, they are welcome to compete and Geely is best suited to do that because Volvo is here already.

I was shocked then when I saw that Buffett had dumped all his BYD stock. [URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/warren-buffett-just-sold-entire-113917609.html[/URL].

He made a killing on it, and the headlines are he dumped it because of tariffs, but I am not so sure. They weren't selling BYDs in the USA yet.

Then I saw this: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tS_fJJxMjn4[/URL]

If you click on the part of the above video under the section, the rot underneath, this is more of a reason as to why I see Buffett selling: tons of unsold cars, lying about debt, poor working conditions.

This is the same story we keep hearing with China: ghost cities, solar panels not being used, overbuilt car capacity. It kind of reminds me of Japan in the 80's and how everyone thought they were going to take over the world too, but they faded to complete stagnation due to their debt.

At some point, this debt is going to come home to roost for China. The USA has its issues but we are more honest about our debt. Not totally honest but way more honest. Hell, China's electrical generation and China as electrostate is totally BS propaganda to me.

That $37 trillion in debt the USA has is problematic until one looks at assets. [URL]https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/gas/us-energy-facts/[/URL]

The USGS estimates that unconventional USA Oil shale resources hold 2. 6 trillion barrels of oil, with about 1 trillion barrels that are considered recoverable under current economic and technological conditions.

At today's prices, that would be around $100 trillion in assets. Of course, you have to get it out and private industry would take its cut, but it makes that debt number look much more palatable.

And greenies like Spidy do not want us to develop it? LOL. You got to be kidding me!

I repeat: if he is not getting paid by China (and Russia for that matter), he ought to be.[/QUOTE]Hi Elvis,

I hope your RV set up works. Please come back and let us know how it went, that would be interesting.

Yeah, look at Norway. It's doing its best to develop renewables, but it doesn't kneecap its oil and gas industry, like what many Democrats want to do. I don't understand the rationale. To the extent USA Oil is removed from the market, it will be replaced by oil from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Russia, Iran, etc. What's the sense in eliminating American jobs, for the sake of sanctimonious grandstanding? A lot of my friends and some family work in oil and gas BTW.

Very interesting video, especially the part about the subsidies and other support BYD got from the government. I was listening to an interview on CNBC today with BYD's #2, who was hired when the company just had 20 people and was a $300,000 startup. She said they employ 1 million people worldwide. If I'm not mistaken she said they employ 120,000 people in R&D and file an average of over 50 patents a day! Incredible. No doubt they wouldn't be where they are now, which is still a pretty impressive place to be even given recent stumbles and shady dealings, without lots and lots of green pork. Which I still argue is not a good thing.

Still, Spidy's enthusiasm for Chinese EV's probably is justified, in the sense that they've passed up the rest of the world in terms of value and technology. And they fit into China's energy plan. China's going to continue generating lots of electricity, over 50% of what's on its grid from coal, which emits about 2 X the carbon per GW-hour as natural gas. (Aside: Please note that I'm using a metric here, carbon intensity of energy production, that Spidy says is not used in industry. Sorry about that!) And increasing amounts from renewables. China has lots of coal, as well as hydro, solar and wind. On the other hand it has to import lots of oil. So EV's are a logical part of their energy plan. China would rather use domestically produced coal, and renewables, to power vehicles, instead of imported oil. That provides energy security.

As you say, the Chinese don't have anywhere near our technical proficiency in exploiting unconventional oil and natural gas. And the quality of their resource isn't as good either. Undoubtedly they wish they were in our shoes. Imagine how much clearer the sky would be over Beijing if they had the natural gas reserves we do. I wonder if Spidy's ever been to Beijing? Or any other Chinese city? If not that would be an eye opener for him.

Something's squirrelly with the Institute for Energy's resource estimates. They must be for oil shale, where the oil would be extracted mostly through surface mining and processing of the shale, or by in-situ heating. This is mostly not economic at recent prices, although I guess it might be if you expect the price of oil to remain above $100/ barrel. Still, you're correct, there's a lot of unconventional oil, that's not bound in oil shales, left to be recovered in the USA.

I believe the actual federal debt held by the public, once you strip out treasury holdings by the Social Security trust fund, the Fed, etc. , is "only" about $30 trillion. That's about equal to GDP. When debt gets to 100% of GDP for a developed country, you start to worry. (You'd worry at a lot lower levels for developing countries.) You get to 140%, and we're on a trajectory to get there, and you're getting to Italy and Greece territory.

Japan has been an exception, because most of the debt is held domestically, interest rates have been super low, and the central bank (like our Fed) has a lot of power to make rates whatever it wants them to be.

You're right about China, when you add in huge debts run up by local governments, including their off balance sheet debt, and their state owned enterprises. China's debt, like Japan's, is mostly held domestically. And China keeps interest rates very low.

A lot of USA Debt however is held by foreigners. And if they dump it, I think we're screwed. I'm not sure though, that's above my pay grade. I will say that the federal government is paying around $1 trillion a year in interest expense, or over 3% of GDP, and that's not a good thing. Federal revenues run about $4.8 trillion a year, and federal expenditures about $6.5 trillion. The $1.8 trillion difference is the federal deficit.

Here's an analogy. If you had a buddy who made $48,000 a year in income, after tax, would you loan him $300,000, knowing he's going to have to pay you $10,000 in interest on the loan, without paying back any principal? One added piece of information, while he's making $48,000 a year, he's spending $65,000 a year. He probably could repay you if he set his mind to it. But I wouldn't count on it happening.

[QUOTE=Sirioja;3063005]We were nearly gotten rid of the schizophrene putting messe in worldwide economics with inflation for us. Could have been a great day. Look forward next time, to have a better life for billions on our planet, without him in his delirium and trying to rob everybody.[/QUOTE]Yes Biden is still alive after his illness but his inflation still haunts the USA to this day. Don't worry. Trump has the Biden inflation down about 70% and it will get even better after defeat of Iran.

[QUOTE=Tiny12;3062979]Thanks Elvis. ...

P.S. Did you see Spidy's now saying China's the #1 consumer of energy in the world and [b]#27 in CO2 emissions[/b]? ROTFLMAO at the bold text! Also he appears to believe that carbon intensity of energy consumption is something I pulled out of thin air, when it's used by the IEA, governments, electric utilities, major oil companies, ESG funds etc.[/QUOTE]LOL! Yes, thanks again, for verifying the stupidity of your CO2 claims, arguments and dump assertions, I've so nicely debunked!

[QUOTE=Canada;3062679]You know nothing about Canadians. Alberta likes Trump a hell of a lot more than Carney. Once again you just spew made up crap that isn't true. You read something in a far left fake news site and then continue to spread their lies. How long have you been a Canadian? Once again you show the stupidity of posting a link from BBC fake news. They are worse than CNN. Shows a lot about you.[/QUOTE]LOL! Canada's right-wing [B]Conservatives blow a 27-pt lead,[/B] because of your MAGA Fuhrer! And is that the best you got, "fake news"?

BTW, is there a link to an article for your post, to verify and validate that MAGA diatribe and propaganda?

[QUOTE=Canada;3063262]Yes Biden is still alive after his illness but his inflation still haunts the USA to this day. Don't worry. Trump has the Biden inflation down about 70% and it will get even better after defeat of Iran.[/QUOTE]We can all thank Trump for higher gas prices too. Talk about buy he got the whole planet stuck with high gas prices. The 60 days for this self imposed fiasco will soon run out. There's no chance in hell that Congress will approve ground troops in Iran.

Can someone explain why we are there in the first place? Oh, and how do new get out without looking weak? Thanks President Trump!

[QUOTE=Canada;3063262]Yes Biden is still alive after his illness but his inflation still haunts the USA to this day. Don't worry. Trump has the Biden inflation down about 70% and it will get even better after defeat of Iran.[/QUOTE]There was much optimism on the expectation that the easily affordable momentary 9. 1% rate of inflation due to Trump's Pandemic and not nearly as high as many other countries, along with their remarkable private-sector job gains, virtually unheard of in most other countries, would continue its historically positive trajectories well into the next generation.

But then along came Trump with his across-the-board tariffs, a repeat of his 1st term failed trade wars with everyone, the skyrocketing American business bankruptcies and massive private-sector job layoffs, the classic Repub crap overall jobs creation numbers in the wake of a classic Repub Big Beautiful Tax Breaks and Corporate Welfare For Billionaires and Fuck Everyone Else Legislation, his higher and increasing Rate of Inflation vs the trajectory and where it was in the final couple of Biden-Harris years, his unprovoked and failing War of Choice in Iran, his utterly incoherent blithering blathering between prolonged Liquor Cabinet Meeting naps, all of which he expects someone else to fix in "two weeks" and on and on.

Which has still not totally crashed the Envy of the World Economy he inherited from Biden-Harris. Yet. But he is definitely working on it. And he has 2 1/2 more years to accomplish that decades and decades' long apparently contractually-obligated goal of every Repub so-called president of the past 100 years or so; to crash the USA economy and wipe out as many American jobs and household wealth as possible.

Fun Fact: Combining the approximately 3 Million private-sector USA jobs Trump wiped out in his first disastrous term with the so far piddling 1 Million or so that have been created since he took office this time around, it is entirely probable that Donald J. Trump's classic Repub economic policies and stewardship as a so-called president will not have created One. Single. Net. Gain private-sector job by the midterm elections in his sixth year in office. Not one. In fact, if he continues to behave as he has always behaved in his life, it is entirely possible that there will not have been One. Single. Net. Gain private-sector job created under the entire Trump so-called presidency by 12 Noon on January 20,2029. After TWO terms!

Which will be a Worst Economic / Jobs Creation Record for Trump than any USA president in history, far surpassing that of Repubs Hoover, Eisenhower, Bush1, Bush2 and even Trump's own previous Worst Ever record! Of course, that is aside from the millions of people, mostly children, his and Musk's policies and stewardship will have mass murdered by then.

[B]The envy of the world.
Special reports - Oct 19th 2024.
The American economy has left other rich countries in the dust. Expect that to continue, argue Simon Rabinovitch and Henry Curr[/B]

[URL]https://www.economist.com/special-report/2024-10-19[/URL]

[QUOTE=Canada;3063262]Yes Biden is still alive after his illness but his inflation still haunts the USA to this day. Don't worry. Trump has the Biden inflation down about 70% and it will get even better after defeat of Iran.[/QUOTE]Biden was much less dangerous for our world than schizophrene Trump making big inflation, even now in USA. I think billions people on our planet would follow me on this. At the moment, real facts are Trump is failing versus Iran and preferred to stop war, after just spending billions and making messe with inflation in the world. I was disappointed once more he was not shot. Look forward next.

[QUOTE=Canada;3062679]You know nothing about Canadians. Alberta likes Trump a hell of a lot more than Carney. Once again you just spew made up crap that isn't true. You read something in a far left fake news site and then continue to spread their lies. How long have you been a Canadian? Once again you show the stupidity of posting a link from BBC fake news. They are worse than CNN. Shows a lot about you.[/QUOTE]LOL! First you claim, all of Canada loves your MAGA Fuhrer and now its just Alberta?

Well let me do the math for you. If Canada has a population of about 41 million, and Alberta has a population of about 5 million, that means about 12% to 13% of Canadians [B](according to your own testimony above),[/B] is indeed fewer than 1-in-5 Canadians, that love your MAGA Fuhrer, as indicted by the article I posted here: [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3061904&viewfull=1#post3061904[/URL]

So how is it, you claim "fake news" about the article I posted, and yet your own post and words, verify the validation of the article? [B]Fewer Than One-in-Five Canadians View Trump Favorably,[/B] Nov 6th, 2025. [URL]https://researchco.ca/2025/11/06/people-canada/[/URL]

How is it MAGA can't even do simply math? Well thanks for the confirming the article's validity, when it's coming straight from the horse's mouth, as it were, that [B][i]"...most Canadians do indeed dislike your MAGA Fuhrer"[/i][/B]

[QUOTE=Spidy;3063391]LOL! First you claim, all of Canada loves your MAGA Fuhrer and now its just Alberta?

Well let me do the math for you. If Canada has a population of about 41 million, and Alberta has a population of about 5 million, that means about 12% to 13% of Canadians [B](according to your own testimony above),[/B] is indeed fewer than 1-in-5 Canadians, that love your MAGA Fuhrer, as indicted by the article I posted here: [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3061904&viewfull=1#post3061904[/URL]

So how is it, you claim "fake news" about the article I posted, and yet your own post and words, verify the validation of the article? [B]Fewer Than One-in-Five Canadians View Trump Favorably,[/B] Nov 6th, 2025. [URL]https://researchco.ca/2025/11/06/people-canada/[/URL]

How is it MAGA can't even do simply math? Well thanks for the confirming the article's validity, when it's coming straight from the horse's mouth, as it were, that [B][i]"...most Canadians do indeed dislike your MAGA Fuhrer"[/i][/B][/QUOTE]You quoted BBC. That proves your post was fake.

[QUOTE=Sirioja;3063309]Biden was much less dangerous for our world than schizophrene Trump making big inflation, even now in USA. I think billions people on our planet would follow me on this. At the moment, real facts are Trump is failing versus Iran and preferred to stop war, after just spending billions and making messe with inflation in the world. I was disappointed once more he was not shot. Look forward next.[/QUOTE]Trump is not failing in Iran. He has weakened Iran to a breaking point. Biden and Obama strengthened Iran by flooding them with cash. All the presidents in the past 30 years knew that someone would ultimately have to take out Iran but nobody had the balls to do it until Trump. Even Hillary said if she was elected that she would need to do it. Possibly Biden didn't support it because he didn't know Iran was a terrorist country. Probably didn't even know where Iran was. Trump inflation at 3% at the high is still 70% less than Biden inflation high. It is a small price to pay for Trump saving the world. You may not want to pay a little more for gas for a few months to ensure your kids and grandkids are in a safer world but most people do. You aren't worried that Trump will fail and destroy USA. You are worried that he will succeed and make the USA great and he will destroy the democrats political ideology.

[QUOTE=EihTooms;3063303]There was much optimism on the expectation that the easily affordable momentary 9. 1% rate of inflation due to Trump's Pandemic and not nearly as high as many other countries, along with their remarkable private-sector job gains, virtually unheard of in most other countries, would continue its historically positive trajectories well into the next generation.

But then along came Trump with his across-the-board tariffs, a repeat of his 1st term failed trade wars with everyone, the skyrocketing American business bankruptcies and massive private-sector job layoffs, the classic Repub crap overall jobs creation numbers in the wake of a classic Repub Big Beautiful Tax Breaks and Corporate Welfare For Billionaires and Fuck Everyone Else Legislation, his higher and increasing Rate of Inflation vs the trajectory and where it was in the final couple of Biden-Harris years, his unprovoked and failing War of Choice in Iran, his utterly incoherent blithering blathering between prolonged Liquor Cabinet Meeting naps, all of which he expects someone else to fix in "two weeks" and on and on.

Which has still not totally crashed the Envy of the World Economy he inherited from Biden-Harris. Yet. But he is definitely working on it.[/QUOTE]Unbelievable that you can continue to post these lies. Biden didn't even know he was president the last 2 years when the auto pen was running the country.