57% Americans think Trump degraded their economics. After Musk corruption, to be re elected, I wish Americans will talk on midterms, even Trump try to fuck these elections. Our world would be better without him and his mafia of robbers.
Printable View
57% Americans think Trump degraded their economics. After Musk corruption, to be re elected, I wish Americans will talk on midterms, even Trump try to fuck these elections. Our world would be better without him and his mafia of robbers.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3079793]I hear that works in MAGA circles! Knock yourself out!
Dude, maybe you don't read to good these days, on account of the gas fumes. I said "... for all Americas..."[/QUOTE]My writing is not the issue, but your comprehension is. Anyone who showed up in West Texas could fill up with as much natural gas they could carry. That means all Americans.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3079793]This is about, as bad as your Luddite sodium-ion outdated assumptions, where you fail to understand, the growth of electrotech, that is transforming free (and low cost of) energy for everyone and not just for narrow minded Texans.
2026 The Year of the Battery.[/QUOTE]Man, I really do not get the moderators and their crazy censorship over sodium ion batteries. Maybe one own stocks in one of the companies. Let's do a test run and I will lie. Sodium ion batteries are the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Here is a comparison of sodium and lithium power stations: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9k8dsApWIM[/URL]
And I was super impressed with the sodium power station.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3080066][URL]https://youtube.com/shorts/9xhevsgX2CU?si=59JchMM-uy6iW_g3[/URL][/QUOTE]This video spoofs a real hypocrisy among wealthy, elitist Democrats and their bought and paid for politicians, namely, that these folks live in gated communities with plenty of security. They never take public transportation. They do not have to put up with homeless people, street crime, and the violence regular folks (of all ethnicities) living in large metropolitan areas have to deal with every day just going to work, or going to the grocery store, or taking their kids to schools that no longer educate their children. This is the primary reason the Left has lost the working class. Sandy (AOC) for President! Yeah, baby.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3080079]Latin migrants coming to USA shouldn't be considered as enemies and mistreated but neither should law enforcement such as ICE. The failed and extremely counterproductive border policy by Biden and Kamala undoubtedly undermined the American people's desire for a generous migration policy.[/QUOTE]Latin Americans who came here legally know full well what they left behind in their communist home countries. Cuban Americans, for example, are virulently anti-communist which is why the Left dislikes them almost as much as they dislike Jews. But I disagree with you a little bit about Joe and Kamala's open border policy. These jerkoffs believe the policy was a great success and if a Democrat were to win the presidency in 2028, you can be damn sure they will open the border again and let another 20 million undocumented in. Just ask any of the DSA candidates running in 2026.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3079782]I'm sorry bud, but you objectively got a few things wrong.
Iran became a richer and more prosperous country after the 1953 "revolution"[/QUOTE]You need to look back on your history.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3079782]My "tribe" is under occupation in northern Cyprus by the rather genocidal Islamist Turkish regime governed by Recep Kelbdogan Erdogan. The same goes for the Aegean Sea, Armenia, Artsakh and the conditions facing my Christian "tribe" in Syria. To me it was rather enlightening to hear what my fellow Christian "tribes men" from northern Syria and southern Lebanon had to say about the invasion of ISIS from turkey into northern Syria and what Hezbollah is doing against my "tribe" in southern Lebanon. As a European I'm deeply concerned over Putin and Russia's war crimes in Ukraine and how the Turkish Islamist government is using this situation to gain financial and political advantages by trying to control the routes of energy reaching Europe.[/QUOTE]Well, that explains your anti-Muslim POV.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3079782]The fact you want the Iranian terrorist regime to prosper is rather horrific and begs the question why you would want a regime that's terrorizing the world and its own citizens to go on?[/QUOTE]I never said I want them to prosper. I was responding to your ridiculously flawed binary argument.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3079782]To me and everyone else it's obvious that the Iranian dictatorship are governed by the most extremist and violent people in Iran. Anything would be better than the current regime, that's the basic understanding of anything with even an ounce of honesty and knowledge of the Iranian society and how soon over a hundred thousand of Iranians will have been killed this year by the regime.[/QUOTE]And here we go again. You have no clue if the government were toppled that the new one would not be worse than the old. The Iranian regime is not even close to the genocidal levels of other regimes.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3079782]It's rather hilarious to see you go on about dead Muslims when the current reality on the ground in Iran is that normal Iranians are being murdered by Muslims for not wanting to live under sharia laws.[/QUOTE]Sharia law is the pretense that allows the religious leaders to steal their people blind. You do not know one person in the regime or what is going on at the ground level. All you know is Jewish propaganda.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3079782]Why don't you care about what's actually going on in Iran today?[/QUOTE]I do care; it is you whose only answer to anything is killing people and changing the leadership without knowing who the new leadership is or whether they would be better or worse.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3079782]The Iranian regime doesn't want peace and prosperity, that's why they are taking billions from the Iranian people to spend on weapons and foreign militias.[/QUOTE]That moral argument falls short when my money / tax dollars are being used to kill the Iranian people when I do not want it to be used to do so.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3079782]What do you say about the fact that there are terrorist attacks in European cities directly financed and ordered by the Iranian regime?[/QUOTE]I would say look at your history. The USA just attacked Iran and in 1953, we put in a dictator. It is much more complex than good guys and bad guys.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3080113]Here's the problem; this is an anonymous forum so you will and can only be judged from the ideas and opinions you present on this forum.[/QUOTE]Wrong, I present facts. None of which were disputed by you in the post that you quoted.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3080113]You can claim to be the king of Mauritania, I have seen no evidence of either being true. But I can say this; the people I know with verified actual law enforcement experience all say the same thing, ICE is doing a great job![/QUOTE]This is anonymous forum. So the claims your are making could be true or not. Once again, I listed a number of facts that you have either chosen not to dispute or cannot dispute.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3080113]I see what you write and the ideas you propagate and I can't really see any difference compared to what the radical violent left is saying.[/QUOTE]Well if you cannot see the difference between facts and opinions then you don't see very well. I will state again, the post you quoted from contained numerous documented facts that you have chosen either not to dispute or cannot dispute.
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3080119]I don't care for Trump either but your declarations that he is following the law are nonsensical and without merit. The Supreme Court hasn't held that ICE is unconstitutional so your claim claim is false.[/QUOTE]There is immigration law on the books. The problem is not the law it how ICE enforces the law. You have chosen to state your opinions absent of any facts or links. There have been several rulings from the lower courts that ICE is performing it's law enforcement actions in a way that is violating the Constitutional rights of fellow citizens of The Cmdr.
Next time you want to step to The Cmdr, instead of calling names like a child who got his feeling hurt in the school yard, do it with some facts and make a sound argument. Then I might listen to you and you will have a opportunity to earn some respect from The Cmdr and other posters.
[B]Check Ball![/B]
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;3079812][b]Energy is the new world currency! [/b]
Thank your for the link. That is amazing.
The Dis United states of America better put in some work. I mean some serious work! Like [I]we are going to moon because it is hard[/I] work, when it comes to energy production. It's really NOT a political issue. It is a economic issue. Energy is the currency of the world. The Oil markets exist to deliver it refineries around the world a price that allows them the margins to turn it into gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. Personally I think those are going to be needed for a long time as we transition to an electro-state. But one thing cannot be argued, the Dis United States of America needs more electricity production.
[URL]https://www.utilitydive.com/news/ai-data-center-growth-utilities-generation-plans/825541/[/URL]
Pivot to Bitcoin. Bitcoin is energy turned into a digital form that can be used to exchange value at the speed of light throughout the world. Think about it![/QUOTE]WOW! That's some powerful and insightful rethinking about the nature of money! 'Tis great to see some diverse thinking on energy for a change, rather then the typical MAGA fossil fuel outdated rhetoric.
I have to admit, I've never thought about bitcoin that way before. I believe your thinking and statement on energy as a currency, is valid and very profound, as I've often argued that the "free" nature and abundance of renewable energy, has the power to fairly democratize, equalize and radicalize, energy for everyone in the world.
Yes, the generation of Bitcoin does indeed fit quite well with how to use the excess abundance of renewable energy. But unfortunately, I remain, somewhat of a Bitcoin Blockhead. I suspect largely due a lack of understanding and I haven't yet taken the time to explore said digital technological as a currency.
That said, you've given me something to think about, by introducing Bitcoin as energy currency, that is really just technological energy, that persists, [B]as a durable digital monetary asset,[/B] is very eyeopening.
Although, it remains to be seen, if bitcoin technologies can truly transformative and [B]"democratize"[/B] digital money. [I]Okay, okay...[/I]so can it, "democratize" digital money, or is this maybe too much in the weeds, or too woke, or just naive thinking on my part? Do you see bitcoin (energy as a currency), being as transformative as renewable clean energy tech, bringing an available and stable form of digital currency to the worldwide masses, largely possible, due to clean excess and abundant renewable free energy?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3080125]Here is a comparison of sodium and lithium power stations: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9k8dsApWIM[/URL]
And I was super impressed with the sodium power station.[/QUOTE]Sodium power stations [I]...Your strength of sodium-ion batteries, lies within the comparison of [b]small portable power stations...[/b]REALLY?[/I].
[NOPARSE]Dude, you do realize, that while CATL's Naxtra sodium-ion cells have reached 165-175 Wh/kg in mass production, and are nipping at the heels of mainstream LFP's (170-205 Wh/kg), the rapid advancement in sodium-ions have a very credible range outlook of 200 Wh/kg by as early as 2028.
Advanced sodium-ion battery prototypes are now approaching 200 Wh/kg. An international team of scientists has reviewed recent advances in sodium-ion battery components, highlighting their potential as a lower-cost, more sustainable alternative to lithium-ion batteries.[/NOPARSE] [URL]https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/08/10/advanced-sodium-ion-battery-prototypes-now-approaching-200-wh-kg/[/URL].
[B]AND FOR GOOD MEASURE:[/B]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3076117]Sodium-ion batteries store less energy by weight or volume, which means that you need bigger batteries to store the same amount of energy compared to lithium batteries. This limits their appeal for mobile devices and electric vehicles where manufacturers are inclined toward lightweight solutions.
So yeah, maybe sodium batteries have a place over Lithium with regards to batteries that do not need to be moved, but if they have to be moved around in something like an EV, they are inferior to Lithium. [b]That is just physics.[/b][/QUOTE]Okay, so let's take a look at yet another Chinese company, CATL (other than the last posted, HiNas Starfish who give use the world's first 676 kWh sodium-ion electric mining truck), provide a large scale commercial example rather than an large scale industrial scale example (as if that wasn't convincing enough), of our China keeps defying MAGA laws of physics, shall we?
[NOPARSE]Don't forget...the Changan Nevo A06 (due out in Q3-2026), is the world's first mass-produced mainstream passenger electric vehicle to feature a sodium-ion battery. Developed through a partnership between Changan Automobile and battery giant CATL, the mid-size sedan utilizes a 45 kWh CATL Naxtra sodium-ion battery pack, delivering over 400 kilometers (approx. 249 miles), of CLTC [/NOPARSE]range. [URL]https://carnewschina.com/2026/02/05/changan-and-catl-unveil-worlds-first-mass-produced-sodium-ion-passenger-ev/[/URL] or [URL]https://www.catl.com/en/news/6720.html[/URL].
I just love it, when I don't have to do any hard lifting, by constantly updating, debunking and educating, the misinformed. Just sit back and allow the [I][b]Electrotech Universe,[/b] to tell them...WTF are you talking about or STFU already![/I]
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3080079]President Trump won mainly because of the migration chaos brought on by Biden and Kamala just like Biden was able to win the election in 2020 because of the global COVID 19 pandemic and the chaos created by the liberals in USA to be able to win the Presidential election against President Trump.
The three states you mentioned have a population of 30 million people, a 100 k is less than 0. 5% of the totalt population.
Two other things; many were surprised and very impressed by how well President Trump did in many states, not at least the blue states affected by Biden&Kamala's open border policy.
BTW, didn't also Nevada, Georgia, Arizona turn red in the beautiful 2024 Presidential win for President Trump?
Oh well, Latin migrants coming to USA shouldn't be considered as enemies and mistreated but neither should law enforcement such as ICE. The failed and extremely counterproductive border policy by Biden and Kamala undoubtedly undermined the American people's desire for a generous migration policy.[/QUOTE]Had approximately 114,900 of the Muslim voters in PA, MI, and WI, or less than 0. 75 of a single percentage point of the votes in those three targeted states, not swung from their usual Dem candidate vote to the Repub candidate, Trump would not be president today.
No swing by any typically Dem voting demographic in any other states on any other issues was enough to make up for the loss of Electorate College votes that one demographic in those three states on that one issue would have meant to the outcome. The Muslim Community Leaders in those states knew that could be the case before the election, the pollsters knew it, the various campaign directors knew it, Musk knew it, Netanyahu knew it, Trump knew it, Harris knew it and after that one group's relatively tiny handful swing in those three targeted states did indeed "give Trump the presidency", they took credit for it and Trump did not refute that conclusion.
Otherwise, no typically Dem-voting demographic "left" the Democratic Party or the Democratic candidate in enough numbers to flip a typically Blue state or hand Trump a "winning" Electoral College vote from anywhere in the country on any other issue. Dem voters handed Harris the Dem / Blue states and Repub voters handed Trump the Repub / Red states. As usually is the case. Neither any perceived "failure" by the Biden administration nor "glorious promise and success" by Trump changes that predictable pattern one iota.
Those three states clinched the win for Trump and by razor-thin margins. Without that happening, Trump is not president today, Harris is:
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election[/URL]
And all it took was for Netanyahu to strategically delay the exact same ceasefire agreement negotiated by Biden in May 2024 until after the election and for the consequently riled up Muslim Community Leaders in the region of those three states to motivate and get out the vote of their Community on that one issue to make it happen for Trump:
[B]Trump's Muslim backers say he fulfilled election promise on Gaza
Muslim allies, who rallied the American minority to vote for Donald Trump in November election, give credit to Trump for Gaza truce deal and say the Republican leader delivered his election promise even before Day 1 in office.
Jan. 16, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.trtworld.com/article/18254320[/URL]
[QUOTE]On Wednesday, as the ceasefire deal was announced by Qatar, one of the chief mediators, Trump wasted no time in declaring he was the main force behind the agreement.
"This EPIC ceasefire agreement could have only happened as a result of our Historic Victory in November, as it signalled to the entire World that my Administration would seek Peace and negotiate deals to ensure the safety of all Americans, and our Allies," Trump wrote on social media.
Minutes later, US President Joe Biden joined the fray and claimed credit for the deal. [B]He asserted the agreement was reached under "the precise contours" of a plan that he set out some eight months ago[/b].[/QUOTE]And, as usual, Joe Biden's assertion was correct.
Of course, Trump immediately stabbed those Muslim Community Leaders in the back after they foolishly swung enough votes away from Harris across those three states on that one issue to give him that razor-thin win. LOL:
[B]Trump's pro-Israel cabinet picks upset Muslims who voted for him.
Nov. 16, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/us/muslims-who-voted-trump-upset-by-his-pro-israel-cabinet-picks-2024-11-15/[/URL]
[QUOTE]WASHINGTON, Nov 14 (Reuters) - U.S. Muslim leaders who supported Republican Donald Trump to protest against the Biden administration's support for Israel's war on Gaza and attacks on Lebanon have been deeply disappointed by his cabinet picks, they tell Reuters.
[B]"Trump won because of us and we're not happy with his secretary of state pick and others,"[/b] said Rabiul Chowdhury, a Philadelphia investor who chaired the Abandon Harris campaign in Pennsylvania and co-founded Muslims for Trump.[/QUOTE]Have you got any links to credinle and verifiable sources that shows otherwise with actual numbers, stats and results? So far neither you nor anybody else making your claim has been able to do so.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3080154]WOW! That's some powerful and insightful rethinking about the nature of money! 'Tis great to see some diverse thinking on energy for a change, rather then the typical MAGA fossil fuel outdated rhetoric.[/QUOTE]I'm glad you see the potential. I threw the comment out there thinking it would just get over looked because so many of the MAGA posters think everyone has a side. My side the human side.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3080154]I have to admit, I've never thought about bitcoin that way before. I believe your thinking and statement on energy as a currency, is valid and very profound, as I've often argued that the "free" nature and abundance of renewable energy, has the power to fairly democratize, equalize and radicalize, energy for everyone in the world.[/QUOTE]Bitcoin is doing that in parts of the world.
Africa now accounts for 3% of the global Bitcoin mining hashrate, with the vast majority of this activity (2. 5%) concentrated in Ethiopia, which has emerged as the continent's primary mining hub due to its cheap, abundant renewable hydroelectric power.
[URL]https://www.forbesafrica.com/current-affairs/2025/09/25/could-bitcoin-mining-power-rural-africa[/URL]
Bitcoin mining in Texas utilizes stranded energyexcess power from oil and gas drilling (often flared methane) and renewable sources like wind and solar that cannot be transmitted to population centers due to grid congestion.
[URL]https://cryptoslate.com/bitcoin-miners-saved-the-texas-power-grid-from-collapse-but-their-lucrative-pivot-to-ai-is-stripping-away-the-emergency-brake/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Spidy;3080154]Yes, the generation of Bitcoin does indeed fit quite well with how to use the excess abundance of renewable energy. But unfortunately, I remain, somewhat of a Bitcoin Blockhead. I suspect largely due a lack of understanding and I haven't yet taken the time to explore said digital technological as a currency.[/QUOTE]I just need one person to explore Bitcoin to see if it works for them in their lives.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3080154]That said, you've given me something to think about, by introducing Bitcoin as energy currency, that is really just technological energy, that persists, [B]as a durable digital monetary asset,[/B] is very eyeopening.[/QUOTE]Bitcoin is a opt in system. Just like putting solar on your roof.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3080154]Although, it remains to be seen, if bitcoin technologies can truly transformative and [B]"democratize"[/B] digital money. [I]Okay, okay...[/I]so can it, "democratize" digital money, or is this maybe too much in the weeds, or too woke, or just naive thinking on my part? [/QUOTE]If you look at the incentives of Bitcoin. It changes you from a high time preference to a low time preference thinker.
[QUOTE]Low time preference is an economic and psychological concept describing a tendency to value future benefits highly, prioritizing long-term gains over immediate gratification. Individuals with this trait are characterized by patience, delayed gratification, and a focus on future stability, often leading to behaviors such as saving, investing, and acquiring durable goods.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.sazmining.com/blog/understanding-high-and-low-time-preference[/URL]
[QUOTE=Spidy;3080154]Do you see bitcoin (energy as a currency), being as transformative as renewable clean energy tech, bringing an available and stable form of digital currency to the worldwide masses, largely possible, due to clean excess and abundant renewable free energy?[/QUOTE]My brother Bitcoin is already transforming those who opt in. The problem is education. [B]Bitcoin is hard![/B]. I speak on it with friends. They say [I]number go up[/I] only. They see it in terms of fiat currency. I don't see Bitcoin that way. I see it as money. I can use it to exchange value with anyone in the world.
[B]Bitcoin is deflationary[/B] We are taught that inflation is good. It is not. The natural state of a free market is deflationary. The cost of everything should go to zero. It does not due to the inflationary nature of fiat currency. Bitcoin will allow all of our fellow human beings on earth to benefit from our joint production. Some will have more Bitcoin than others. But the value of Bitcoin is fixed. That means once you own a Sat it will always be worth one Sat. Never less. Now the value of that Sat may go up. But only to the people who provide value in order to earn that Sat from you.
[B]Bitcoin will not change human nature![/B] The question for me is: [I]Is human nature inherently good[/I]?
If human nature is not, then Bitcoin ultimately will be co-opted by the system and we will be back to the same ole same ole problems of the fiat currency system. But if Bitcoin remains, secure, free and independent then it will be transformative to the world. But only for the people who see the potential like you and I. It is possible for Bitcoin to change the world because Bitcoin can change the money. The incentives are there. But it requires each and every individual to adopt it. Those who do so before others will receive the most benefits. It will create an incentive to provide value. The value that is provided will help us all. Because the currency we use will never decline in value. I do not watch the price of Bitcoin in fiat currency. The price of Bitcoin is unimportant to me. What is important is my flow and my stack.
[B]Stack Sats![/B]
When your crazy Trump wanted to build a beach resort in Gaza and kick Muslims away, to thank them for his election. Same than Black, Latins, women, how could they be so no brained to vote for him, when he hates all of them.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3080130]You need to look back on your history.
Well, that explains your anti-Muslim POV.
I never said I want them to prosper. I was responding to your ridiculously flawed binary argument.
And here we go again. You have no clue if the government were toppled that the new one would not be worse than the old. The Iranian regime is not even close to the genocidal levels of other regimes.
Sharia law is the pretense that allows the religious leaders to steal their people blind. You do not know one person in the regime or what is going on at the ground level. All you know is Jewish propaganda.
I do care; it is you whose only answer to anything is killing people and changing the leadership without knowing who the new leadership is or whether they would be better or worse.[/QUOTE]You're aware of the Islamic revolution in 1979? Iran has been attacking Americans and Europeans ever since.
Operation Ajax ceased to be relevant many years ago.
It's fascinating how you say that you care about Iranians but you keep going on and on about how the the Iranian regime consists of good people even though they are responsible for murdering tens of thousands of innocent civilian Iranians. It truly doesn't make any sense. How can you claim that you support the Iranian people but not find it morally justified that USA is taking out the people responsible for slaughtering Iranian civilians?
I have close friends with relatives still living in Iran and they support regime change since the current regime consists of the worst people Iran has to offer.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3080169]Had approximately 114,900 of the Muslim voters in PA, MI, and WI, or less than 0. 75 of a single percentage point of the votes in those three targeted states, not swung from their usual Dem candidate vote to the Repub candidate, Trump would not be president today.
No swing by any typically Dem voting demographic in any other states on any other issues was enough to make up for the loss of Electorate College votes that one demographic in those three states on that one issue would have meant to the outcome. The Muslim Community Leaders in those states knew that could be the case before the election, the pollsters knew it, the various campaign directors knew it, Musk knew it, Netanyahu knew it, Trump knew it, Harris knew it and after that one group's relatively tiny handful swing in those three targeted states did indeed "give Trump the presidency", they took credit for it and Trump did not refute that conclusion.
Otherwise, no typically Dem-voting demographic "left" the Democratic Party or the Democratic candidate in enough numbers to flip a typically Blue state or hand Trump a "winning" Electoral College vote from anywhere in the country on any other issue. Dem voters handed Harris the Dem / Blue states and Repub voters handed Trump the Repub / Red states. As usually is the case. Neither any perceived "failure" by the Biden administration nor "glorious promise and success" by Trump changes that predictable pattern one iota.
Those three states clinched the win for Trump and by razor-thin margins. Without that happening, Trump is not president today, Harris is:.[/QUOTE]President won the election for three reasons:
1. The economy and rising costs of living.
2. The border crisis.
3. Trump was simply a better candidate than Kamala.
Kamala also lost voters for being perceived as anti-Israeli.
Lolol. Remember when Trump called a special press conference to tell everyone to go online to see how Russia Russia Russia was a "hoax" and that there was all this evidence that foreign influence rigged the election that he lost in a landslide to Joe Biden, then it turned out the Intel actually showed the foreign influence was trying to damage the Biden campaign and help Trump win?
Well, Blithering Numbskull Liar Trump done it again!
And, no, this is not a report only published by The Guardian. It can be found in many other credible Real News sources. But The Guardian allows links to its reports without being blocked behind a pay wall.
[B]Trump shows off article on lower drug prices that says Biden deserves credit, not him.
US president credits himself with lowest drug prices in 60 years, when article says drop is more likely due to Biden.
Aug. 15, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/aug/15/trump-washington-post-drug-prices[/URL]
[QUOTE]The White House flooded social media on Saturday with an image of Donald Trump showing off the recent Washington Post headline Prescription drug prices record sharpest drop in more than 60 years, but failed to mention that experts cited in the article actually attributed the price drop to Joe Biden, not Trump.
..........
What the president did not say is that the text of the article, published by the Post on Thursday, reported that while the Trump White House took credit for the biggest year-over-year drop in drug prices in more than 60 years in July, independent experts said a Biden-era policy that requires Medicare to negotiate prices for some popular prescription drugs is more likely to be driving down costs.
[B]"The Inflation Reduction Act was a signature accomplishment of former president Joe Biden, a sprawling measure enacted in 2022 that aimed to lower prescription drug prices by requiring Medicare, the federal health program for the elderly, to begin negotiating the prices it pays drugmakers for an array of popular and costly prescription drugs, the Posts report noted. The first price reductions took effect at the beginning of this year.[/b][/QUOTE]Not one Repub voted for that Biden / Dem legislation. But Repub Icon of Icons and every other Repub will be falling all over themselves to take credit for something historically positive for the American people that was proposed, fought for and passed by Dems when they occupied the White House and held the Majorities in the House and Senate.
As usual. Lolol.
Thanks, Joe.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3080209]President won the election for three reasons:
1. The economy and rising costs of living.
2. The border crisis.
3. Trump was simply a better candidate than Kamala.
Kamala also lost voters for being perceived as anti-Israeli.[/QUOTE]Except that if approximately 114,900 of the hundreds of thousands of Muslim voters spread across PA, MI, and WI hadn't swung their usual Dem candidate votes away from Harris on the one issue the Muslim Community Leaders in those states said they were encouraging their Community to do and in accordance with what Musk money was targeting them to do and what Netanyahu's manipulation of the timing of his honoring the ceasefire until after the election was meant to do, Trump would not have won the election. Harris would have won.
None of the unsubstantiated and unsupported by the facts reasons you listed was the reason that relatively tiny handful of angry Muslims in the only three swing states that mattered swung their votes away from Harris and thereby "gave Trump the presidency. ".
LOL. Ever wonder why Trump's supposed "superior" policies on the issues you and your Mainstream Media puppeteers think were so much in his favor for the election dropped like a rock in a pond in the polls within just a few months after he supposedly "won the election" on those issues? Even among the dumb Repub hillbillies who voted for him?
That's because those weren't the reasons he won. The only reason he won was that narrow edge he had exactly where it counted among one demographic on one issue in the only three swing states that mattered and thanks almost entirely to a decision Netanyahu made on that one issue in order to put his boy in the White House.
And now you know why his boy had to pay Netanyahu back for that tremendous favor with the money, standing, blood and lives of the American people in his utterly made up reasoned Repub quagmire War of Choice in Iran based on a Repub lie.