ShooBree you need to read The Constitution of the United States of America
If you look at the official casualty lists, the majority of KIAs were in the Navy and Air Force. The Army deaths occur well outside the theater of operations and were not due to direct combat operations. Even though that is the case it is still sad. What is worse is you do not believe in what they were fighting for. The Untied States Constitution. In it have the right to be critical of civilian leadership. Review the First Amendment.
You seem to be unaware of the rights me and my fellow citizens have been given in the founding documents of the country you are a citizen in. That is sad!
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3080975]So you're unaware that there are American soldiers involved in this? That's hilarious.[/QUOTE]
Let's keep it real. Read the The Constitution of the United States of America!
The conflict in Iran, no matter how you define it will not be won without [I]boots on the ground[/I]. Never in the history of mankind has a conflict been won with ground solders unless the enemy gives up under siege.
Are you saying the Dis United States of America has the power to cut all vital supplies to Iran until they surrender unconditionally?
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;3081017]The truth is no one knows how the war will turn out. There are no embedded reporters covering the story from either side. If one hates Trump there is a strong tendency to think the war is unwinnable. If one supports Trump there is the conviction that the Mullahs will cave. No one know how things will turn out!
Given the above I think one should be aware of the possible outcomes. So mainly for the lefties I post the following link with the headline: "Iran faces massive new triple-threat as Hormuz begins to open, cash gets tight and pols call to end the war". This could be good news, right? Or do you hate Trump so much that you are rooting for an IRCG victory? We live in amazing times.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2026/08/23/world-news/iran-faces-triple-threat-as-control-over-hormuz-economy-wavers/[/URL][/QUOTE]
3 photos
Oh yes there were. And everyone knew there were.
[QUOTE=ShooBree;3080849]Sorry, your theories are wrong. There aren't enough Muslims in America and[b] the certain swing state[/b] for your theories to be true even in theory.
People love Trump, that's why he keeps winning even when republicans on a lower level fails to win.
They are Trump supporters. Not republicans.[/QUOTE]Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are right there among the battleground states that have enough Muslim voters to swing a presidential election, as they did in 2024. In other swing states, too. But the Muslim Community voters abandoning Harris in those other swing states did not squeak out the winning Electoral College votes Trump needed. The ones in MI, PA and WI did and if they hadn't abandoned Harris in just enough numbers in those three states, Trump would not have won. Harris would have won:
[URL]https://youtu.be/0KgX6I3GBCA?is=GrP-LFLdXYY0VQlR[/URL]
[URL]https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/8/25/the-muslim-american-vote-matters-and-it-can-no-longer-be-taken-for[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/swing-state-muslim-voters-threaten-vote-against-biden-rcna122870[/URL]