-
As another showdown with Trump looms, Biden's record abroad is his biggest liability
Here is a gem from Seymour Hersch:
Donald Trump won big in Iowa this week, as anyone with an ounce of sense knew would happen, despite days of dishonest and tedious wishful thinking from CNN and MSNBC, and some print media, about the possibility of a Haley surge in Iowa that could carry over to New Hampshire.
Forget about that. The Republican nominee will be Donald Trump, unless he is stopped by the courts, and at this point the odds are that he, if untethered, will sweep to victory this November and could bring the House and Senate with him.
The Democratic response, with a few exceptions, has been to enter a state of denial. In my Washington world, the looming disaster is swept aside by loyal Democrats who insist that Biden beat Trump once before and he can do it again. Those who complain, or duty note, the lack of political viability of Vice President Kamala Harris are told they are racist or a misogynist.
Biden's initial accomplishmentslegislation that improved the daily lives of millions of Americans in desperate needhas been etched away by a series of foreign policy blunders that stem from ignorance and the visceral Russophobia that made him, and his foreign policy aides, refuse to assure Russian President Vladimir Putin before he pulled the trigger that the United States would never support Ukraine's entry into NATO. That might have been enough, with fuller elaboration, to keep the Russian ruler from launching a war that was far from necessary.
Last November, an analysis by Michael von der Schulenburg, a retired United Nations official, Hajo Funke, a political scientist, and General Harald Kujat, the highest ranking German officer of the Bundeswehr and at NATO before his retirement, concluded that a settlement of the war was possible in March 2022, one month after Russia began its invasion of Ukraine. The paper, whose findings were widely reported in Europe but not in the United States, said that the talks were sabotaged by objections from NATO as well as the Biden administration and the British government then headed by Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
Nonetheless, secret peace talks are still ongoing between the leading generals of Russia and Ukraine, with an agreement about an exchange of prisoners on the verge of being worked out. It was the release of American prisoners of war by North Vietnam that was the key factor in ending that war. It's not clear where the Biden administration stands on such a deal. It's also not known whether Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is in any way involved with the talks. At this point it seems unlikely.
Biden's support for Israel and its wildly disproportionate responsethe heavy bombing that still goes onto the horrors of the Hamas' October 7 raid is on the record: "We've got your back," he famously told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, referring to the bombs and other arms that continue to flow to Israel, most recently without Congressional approval, as mandated by law. The president talks about a ceasefire but has made no specific on-the-record demand to Tel Aviv for such. Millions around the world, including untold thousands in America, have been protesting America's support for Israel's war, but the president hangs on. The best defense he can muster is his claim that he has raised the issue of a ceasefire with the Israelis.
The clearest expression of Biden's view of American responsibilities after October 7 came in a televised speech he made on October 19, after his second, very brief visit to Tel Aviv, when he and Secretary of State Antony Blinken sat in on an Israeli national security meeting. It was a time when the ferocity of the Israeli bombing attacks on the homes and apartments buildings throughout Gaza City with their many thousands of civilian casualties, had just begun raising questions. Israel clearly was responding to the Hamas attack by targeting everything standing in Gaza.
"I know we have our divisions at home," Biden said. "We have to get past them. We can't let petty, partisan, angry politics get in the way of our responsibilities as a great nation. We cannot and will not let terrorists like Hamas and tyrants like Putin win. I refuse to let that happen. " he asked Congress for a $100 billion foreign aid appropriation that included funding for both Israel and Ukraine.
End of link. Winning Pedo Joe? You sound like Charlie Sheen. You win by living well. Bin Laden won when the USA over reacted and spent trillions on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that netted nothing.
In the mean time, there was that guest from Alaska on Joe Rogan's show advocating for building natural gas and water pipelines from Alaska. We could finance those and have money left over versus financing this Ukraine debacle. I know. I know. How can we think about cheaper food and energy and ample clean water when Putin and Hamas might win? Whatever the fuck that means.
-
Trump totally lost it years ago.
Okay, to recap. Donald Covfefe Trump has claimed:
He ran for president against Barack Obama.
And won.
He ran for president against George W. Bush.
And won.
He averted WWII.
He was busy being president all through 2021.
He ran for president against Joe Biden in 2020 and won.
And so much more.
Now this; he thinks Nikki Haley was Speaker of the House on January 6, 2021.
And at least one of his spokesholes is actually trying to gaslight the world into believing Trump meant every word of that Nikki Haley blither because it was TRUE! LOL.
[B]Dementia Don Strikes Again: Blames Nikki Haley For Jan. 6th Failures.
Trump confuses Nikki Haley with Nancy Pelosi when talking about Jan. 6th at an unhinged rally in New Hampshire on Friday night.[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/01/dementia-don-strikes-again-blames-nikki[/URL]
[QUOTE]"Nikki Haley, you know they, do you know they destroyed all of the information, all of the evidence, everything, deleted and destroyed all of it. All of it because of lots of things like Nikki Haley is in charge of security. We offered her 10,000 people, soldiers, National Guard, whatever they want. They turned it down. They dont want to talk about that. These are very dishonest people."[/QUOTE]He repeats Nikki Haley's name in that blithering, blathering rant at least FOUR TIMES. Watch the video on that link.
There is no Joe Biden counterpart to that astonishing example of cognitive impairment. Never has been. Not only vs Doneld Covfefe Trump. But also vs Trump's spokeshole!
LOL. BTW, the X responses in that link are hilarious. Must-Reads.
-
Joey the Zionist
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2887718]Here is a gem from Seymour Hersch:
Biden's initial accomplishmentslegislation that improved the daily lives of millions of Americans in desperate needhas been etched away by a series of foreign policy blunders that stem from ignorance and the visceral Russophobia that made him, and his foreign policy aides, refuse to assure Russian President Vladimir Putin before he pulled the trigger that the United States would never support Ukraine's entry into NATO. That might have been enough, with fuller elaboration, to keep the Russian ruler from launching a war that was far from necessary.
Biden's support for Israel and its wildly disproportionate responsethe heavy bombing that still goes onto the horrors of the Hamas' October 7 raid is on the record: "We've got your back," he famously told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, referring to the bombs and other arms that continue to flow to Israel, most recently without Congressional approval, as mandated by law. The president talks about a ceasefire but has made no specific on-the-record demand to Tel Aviv for such. Millions around the world, including untold thousands in America, have been protesting America's support for Israel's war, but the president hangs on. The best defense he can muster is his claim that he has raised the issue of a ceasefire with the Israelis.
The clearest expression of Biden's view of American responsibilities after October 7 came in a televised speech he made on October 19, after his second, very brief visit to Tel Aviv, when he and Secretary of State Antony Blinken sat in on an Israeli national security meeting. It was a time when the ferocity of the Israeli bombing attacks on the homes and apartments buildings throughout Gaza City with their many thousands of civilian casualties, had just begun raising questions. Israel clearly was responding to the Hamas attack by targeting everything standing in Gaza.
"I know we have our divisions at home," Biden said. "We have to get past them. We can't let petty, partisan, angry politics get in the way of our responsibilities as a great nation. We cannot and will not let terrorists like Hamas and tyrants like Putin win. I refuse to let that happen. " he asked Congress for a $100 billion foreign aid appropriation that included funding for both Israel and Ukraine.
End of link. Winning Pedo Joe? You sound like Charlie Sheen. You win by living well. Bin Laden won when the USA over reacted and spent trillions on wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that netted nothing.
In the mean time, there was that guest from Alaska on Joe Rogan's show advocating for building natural gas and water pipelines from Alaska. We could finance those and have money left over versus financing this Ukraine debacle. I know. I know. How can we think about cheaper food and energy and ample clean water when Putin and Hamas might win? Whatever the fuck that means.[/QUOTE]He went way overboard when he proudly proclaimed that he was a Zionist! What a fool. He just declared an emergency a week or two ago so he could supply Bebe with more weapons immediately and bypassed Congress. They need them for "defense". What a joke and Bebe thumbs his nose at him too. What a Zionist fool Joey is!
-
[QUOTE=ChuchoLoco;2887939]He went way overboard when he proudly proclaimed that he was a Zionist! What a fool. He just declared an emergency a week or two ago so he could supply Bebe with more weapons immediately and bypassed Congress. They need them for "defense". What a joke and Bebe thumbs his nose at him too. What a Zionist fool Joey is![/QUOTE]Agreed. This is Biden's Waterloo. I never thought Gaza would be the issue that would so splinter the Dems, but it turned out to be.
-
Anti-Zionists = anti-Semites.
[QUOTE=ChuchoLoco;2887939]He went way overboard when he proudly proclaimed that he was a Zionist! What a fool. He just declared an emergency a week or two ago so he could supply Bebe with more weapons immediately and bypassed Congress. They need them for "defense". What a joke and Bebe thumbs his nose at him too. What a Zionist fool Joey is![/QUOTE]Zionism simply means developing and defending Israel. There are no reasons for non-anti-Semites to be against Zionism.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2888091]There are no reasons for non-anti-Semites to be against Zionism.[/QUOTE]I guess I could ask what this negative rambling means but let's just cut it down to its core and show how arrogant a statement this is: There are no reasons to be against Zionism. I guess if you are anti-zionist you have to be antisemitic and hate and want all Jews dead like Hitler. Of course, you run into a problem when you see some Jews are actually anti-Zionist, [URL]https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt14bsxdg[/URL].
Maybe those Jews have a thing for suicide.
But this is just Xpartan and his Democratic name calling brain at work. If you are against the billions being poured down the drain in Ukraine, your sole reason for wanting that according to him is you love Putin and want to suck his dick.
The worst though was the case of "never mind" with Covid. Do you remember all that stupid shit about how Republicans were going to die in droves with Covid and Dems were going to live? Do you remember the idiotic anti-vax talk?
Whatever happened to that? Xpartan, you are still getting your boosters right? Between you and John Clayton, what are you dummies up to now? Twenty boosters? Twenty five? How come you aren't calling people antivaxxers now?
-
Bibi, the GW Bush and Trump of Israeli National Security
[QUOTE=ChuchoLoco;2887939]He went way overboard when he proudly proclaimed that he was a Zionist! What a fool. He just declared an emergency a week or two ago so he could supply Bebe with more weapons immediately and bypassed Congress. They need them for "defense". What a joke and Bebe thumbs his nose at him too. What a Zionist fool Joey is![/QUOTE]The Biden / USA support for Israel is about supporting Israel, not about supporting the huge mistake Israel made in ever electing a numbskull big talker horrific results version of conservatives GW Bush and Donald Trump in Bibi Netanyahu.
Unfortunately for Israel, that huge mistake put them in the position of both leaving their country bare ass naked against a devastating national security breach the same as G W Bush did re 9/11 and as Trump did re his 2018 and 2019 policies that created Trump's Pandemic.
Then, their historcally weak to non existential national security policies having produced those horrific results, their response (G W Bush invading all the wrong countries for all the wrong reasons, Trump exacerbating and worsening the deaths and disasterous worldwide economic and supply-chain collapse and inflation by lying about his Pandemic all through critical year 2020) only made their initial "Once in 100 Years" Disasters even worse.
Thankfully, the world did not totally demonize and abandon the concept and hope for the future of a democratic United States of America simply because we made the horrible mistake of "electing" G W Bush as a so-called potus.
Thankfully, the world did not yet totally demonize and abandon us for making the horrific mistake of "electing" Trump as so-called potus.
The one true democracy in that Region is what Biden is supporting, not a horrible mistake by the electorate. Given the choices, walking away from Israel because they elected that numbskull and now grasp just how foolish that was would be the worst choice.
-
Trump and Repubs think teachers with guns will solve...
DOJ findings on the mass shooting in Uvalde, TX, by the Uvalde police force, is a scything indictment on the cowardice of their police department, that failed the parents of the children shot.
[LIST][b]New York Times:[/b] Justice Department Finds [b]Unimaginable Failure[/b] in Uvalde Police Response
[i]The most significant failure, investigators concluded, was the decision by local police officials to classify the incident as a barricaded standoff rather than an active-shooter scenario, which would have demanded instant and aggressive action.[/i]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/18/us/uvalde-school-shooting-report-doj.html[/URL][/LIST]
But what is so blatantly glaring, is when Trump, MTG and the Lauren Boebert's of the world, along with right-wing media get up on high-horse and claim, [b][i]"...we need to consider arming teachers and give them guns, to combat the shooters, in these mass school shootings...",[/i][/b] is just INSANE.
So let me get this right! Trained (FRICKIN'!) police officers...
[LIST] who have years of training in civic and military combat tactics, ordinances and techniques;[/LIST][LIST] who are trained to take-down armed criminals, gang-bangers and drug cartels;[/LIST][LIST] who are trained to combat terrorists and (Repub) insurrectionists;[/LIST][LIST] who are skilled marksmen and shooters;[/LIST]AND
[LIST] who never hardly hesitate, when it comes to shooting, unarmed black AND brown men of color, when running away from them;[/LIST]
Suddenly feared for their lives? Were too scared, to do their jobs and take-down ONE armed gunman, and save the lives of innocent kindergarten children?
So the Repubs' hubris is just so astounding, when Repubs, in staunch support of gun laws, THINK THAT, it's somehow, [b]the teacher's responsibility, when they are:[/b]
[LIST]underpaid and underfunded;[/LIST][LIST]understaffed, undersupported;[/LIST][LIST]undertrained and inexperienced;[/LIST]AND YET STILL;
[LIST]overworked, overtaxed and overburdened with ACTUAL schooling duties;[/LIST]Should still somehow find the [i]"cojones",[/i] [i]"chutzpah"[/i] and [i]"courage"[/i] to combat, tackle or fend off, a crazed armed gunman and at the same time protect their kindergarten children; when trained Uvalde police officers, WOULD NOT and DID NOT engage to do their jobs? Once again, [b]PURE lunacy, bonkers, cuckoo and insane notion by Repubs.[/b]
-
Repubs: More Military Combat Level Weapons in the hands of more Americans, Please
[QUOTE=Spidy;2888304]DOJ findings on the mass shooting in Uvalde, TX, by the Uvalde police force, is a scything indictment on the cowardice of their police department, that failed the parents of the children shot.
[LIST][b]New York Times:[/b] Justice Department Finds [b]Unimaginable Failure[/b] in Uvalde Police Response
[i]The most significant failure, investigators concluded, was the decision by local police officials to classify the incident as a barricaded standoff rather than an active-shooter scenario, which would have demanded instant and aggressive action.[/i]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/18/us/uvalde-school-shooting-report-doj.html[/URL][/LIST]
But what is so blatantly glaring, is when Trump, MTG and the Lauren Boebert's of the world, along with right-wing media get up on high-horse and claim, [b][i]"...we need to consider arming teachers and give them guns, to combat the shooters, in these mass school shootings...",[/i][/b] is just INSANE.
So let me get this right! Trained (FRICKIN'!) police officers...
[LIST] who have years of training in civic and military combat tactics, ordinances and techniques;[/LIST][LIST] who are trained to take-down armed criminals, gang-bangers and drug cartels;[/LIST][LIST] who are trained to combat terrorists and (Repub) insurrectionists;[/LIST][LIST] who are skilled marksmen and shooters;[/LIST]AND
[LIST] who never hardly hesitate, when it comes to shooting, unarmed black AND brown men of color, when running away from them;[/LIST]
Suddenly feared for their lives? Were too scared, to do their jobs and take-down ONE armed gunman, and save the lives of innocent kindergarten children?
So the Repubs' hubris is just so astounding, when Repubs, in staunch support of gun laws, THINK THAT, it's somehow, [b]the teacher's responsibility, when they are:[/b]
[LIST]underpaid and underfunded;[/LIST][LIST]understaffed, undersupported;[/LIST][LIST]undertrained and inexperienced;[/LIST]AND YET STILL;
[LIST]overworked, overtaxed and overburdened with ACTUAL schooling duties;[/LIST]Should still somehow find the [i]"cojones",[/i] [i]"chutzpah"[/i] and [i]"courage"[/i] to combat, tackle or fend off, a crazed armed gunman and at the same time protect their kindergarten children; when trained Uvalde police officers, WOULD NOT and DID NOT engage to do their jobs? Once again, [b]PURE lunacy, bonkers, cuckoo and insane notion by Repubs.[/b][/QUOTE]You know the NRA-Servant Repubs' mantra: "Guns don't kill children. Bullets fired out of Military Combat Level Repub Guns kill children. Lots and lots of them. Very quickly. And we love it. ".
Those Texas cops were not afraid of the shooter. They were afraid of the gun that shooter had, or rather the bullets that can be fired out of it, that G W Bush, Donald Trump and other Repubs have made certain any lunatic in America can have in order to kill as many kids as they want any time they want. Oh, and as many cops as they want, too.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2888292]The Biden / USA support for Israel is about supporting Israel, not about supporting the huge mistake Israel made in ever electing a numbskull big talker horrific results version of conservatives GW Bush and Donald Trump in Bibi Netanyahu.[/QUOTE]No, it is about kissing the ass of the Wall Street Jews who are the biggest donors to the Democratic party.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2888292]The one true democracy in that Region is what Biden is supporting.[/QUOTE]The only time you Democrats support Democracy is when your side wins. The hypocrisy was on great display in Ukraine as we were supposed to be funding a Democracy as Zelensky was destroying it in Ukraine. Hell, the Democratic primaries are so corrupt that first Bernie Sanders got screwed. No less an authority than Donna Brazile had to call Bernie and tell him how badly Hiliary had cheated: [URL]https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774/[/URL].
The latest "pro-Democracy" flap within the Democratic party involves RFK Jr. This is a Kennedy for God's sake. RFK Jr's uncle won an election so corrupt the dead in Illinois voted for his uncle. He took one look at the "pro-Democracy" Democratic primaries and declared himself an independent candidate. Because Democratic primaries are so rigged, guys like Bill Maher have taken to begging Biden not to run.
Quit giving us this crap about "Democracy" Tooms. Your goal in life is one party rule in the USA. If Israel were a dictatorship, Biden would be beside himself slobbering over and kissing the asses of its leader.
-
The Democrats are literally trying to destroy Democracy
[URL]https://www.aol.com/news/house-jan-6-committee-deleted-091722484.html[/URL]
The whole sham committee needs to be lined up in front of a firing squad.
-
One Party Rule?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2888369]No, it is about kissing the ass of the Wall Street Jews who are the biggest donors to the Democratic party.
The only time you Democrats support Democracy is when your side wins. The hypocrisy was on great display in Ukraine as we were supposed to be funding a Democracy as Zelensky was destroying it in Ukraine. Hell, the Democratic primaries are so corrupt that first Bernie Sanders got screwed. No less an authority than Donna Brazile had to call Bernie and tell him how badly Hiliary had cheated: [URL]https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774/[/URL].
The latest "pro-Democracy" flap within the Democratic party involves RFK Jr. This is a Kennedy for God's sake. RFK Jr's uncle won an election so corrupt the dead in Illinois voted for his uncle. He took one look at the "pro-Democracy" Democratic primaries and declared himself an independent candidate. Because Democratic primaries are so rigged, guys like Bill Maher have taken to begging Biden not to run.
Quit giving us this crap about "Democracy" Tooms. Your goal in life is one party rule in the USA. If Israel were a dictatorship, Biden would be beside himself slobbering over and kissing the asses of its leader.[/QUOTE]When a Party other than the Democratic Party produces something other than Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions, Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction, Great Repub "Once in 100 Years" Disasters and, oh why not, Great Repub Bear Market Crashes, I would be more than happy to vote for a member of that Party.
Until then, yeah, I will be voting exclusively for the only Party that has produced NONE of those Repub Disasters and EVERY Great Dem Historic Economic Recovery, Historic Dem Jobs Creation of the past 100 years or so and, oh why not, much, much greater Stock Market returns.
BTW:
Bernie Sanders was / is not a member of the Democratic Party. Therefore, aside from the fact that he won far, far fewer Dem Primary votes than an actual member of the Democratic Party in 2016, there is really no reason anyone has posited to justify why the DNC should have done anything to help him become the Democratic Party Nominee for POTUS.
Oh, and:
[B]The Myth of the Stolen Election of 1960.
Republicans demanded recounts. Much like in 2020, they changed nothing.
April 21, 2022[/B]
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/articles/election-fraud-stolen-myth-claim-1960-nixon-kennedy-11650494219[/URL]
[QUOTE] A letter (April 11) argues that U.S. voters didnt really choose the president in 1960. While it is possible that Chicago Mayor Richard Daley fraudulently provided John F. Kennedy the 8,800 votes to carry Illinois, Richard Nixon would have also needed Texas, which he lost by nearly 50,000 votes. Fraudulent voting on that scale would have produced some evidence of irregularities and none was produced.[/QUOTE]When even Uber Repub-leaning Murdoch's Wall Street Journal can't spin all the historic and recently uncovered data and evidence that money can buy into a case that poor widdow Repub Crook Nixon was robbed in 1960, it's time to give up that ghost.
-
The world and country are on fire
Thanks Scumbag Joe and Scumbag Barry Hussein (and I would never exempt scumbag Bubba).
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2024/01/23/congress-agency-says-bidens-deputies-took-in-6-2-million-illegals/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/obama-administration-trump-administration-nato/2024/01/22/id/1150568/[/URL]
-
The DNC aka the cheap POS Made in China puppets of Wall St
"No, it is about kissing the ass of the Wall Street Jews who are the biggest donors to the Democratic party.
The only time you Democrats support Democracy is when your side wins. The hypocrisy was on great display in Ukraine as we were supposed to be funding a Democracy as Zelensky was destroying it in Ukraine. Hell, the Democratic primaries are so corrupt that first Bernie Sanders got screwed. No less an authority than Donna Brazile had to call Bernie and tell him how badly Hiliary had cheated: [URL]https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774/[/URL].
The latest "pro-Democracy" flap within the Democratic party involves RFK Jr. This is a Kennedy for God's sake. RFK Jr's uncle won an election so corrupt the dead in Illinois voted for his uncle. He took one look at the "pro-Democracy" Democratic primaries and declared himself an independent candidate. Because Democratic primaries are so rigged, guys like Bill Maher have taken to begging Biden not to run.
Quit giving us this crap about "Democracy" Tooms. Your goal in life is one party rule in the USA. If Israel were a dictatorship, Biden would be beside himself slobbering over and kissing the asses of its leader. ".
[URL]https://jacobin.com/2020/02/bernie-sanders-iowa-caucus-democratic-presidential-primary[/URL]
Does anyone remember how hard they fucked Bernie in 2020 also?
But I'm sure they kicked him a few million to STFU, because you don't hear much from him anymore.
This is really why they hate Trump so much, they can't buy him!!
Hes not a PUTA like the Democrats.
The DNC loves to rig elections, its their raison detre.
They even fucked Bubba out of 3rd term in 2008.
When he got more delegates than Barry Hussein, and they still handed it to the 1/2 black Muslim raised by white people.
-
I clicked around but did not find it in your links
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2888488]Thanks Scumbag Joe and Scumbag Barry Hussein (and I would never exempt scumbag Bubba).
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2024/01/23/congress-agency-says-bidens-deputies-took-in-6-2-million-illegals/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/obama-administration-trump-administration-nato/2024/01/22/id/1150568/[/URL][/QUOTE]I clicked around inside the first article and did not find the part mentioned in in the headline where the CBO refers to 6. 2 Million "illegal" Immigrants. Please provide that link and quote the assertion.
The only hyper-link I found in that first link was to another unsubstantiated Breitbart headline article. Funny.
And I see your Newsmax article forgot all about Putin's invasion of Georgia on Repub GW Bush's watch, for which there was practically no meaningful USA response at all:
[URL]https://www.brookings.edu/articles/george-w-bush-was-tough-on-russia-give-me-a-break/[/URL]
[URL]https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obama-announces-sanctions-punish-russia-crimea-invasion/story?id=22939730[/URL]#text=March%2017%2 see%202014%E2%80%94,and%20 territorial%20 integrity%22%20 of%20 Ukraine.
BTW, you and Newsmax have discovered a newfound Love for NATO?
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2888268]I guess I could ask what this negative rambling means but let's just cut it down to its core and show how arrogant a statement this is: There are no reasons to be against Zionism. I guess if you are anti-zionist you have to be antisemitic and hate and want all Jews dead like Hitler. [/QUOTE]I don't know if you feel about Jews as strongly as Hitler did, but yes, anti-Zionism is simply a euphemism for anti-Semitism.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2888268]Of course, you run into a problem when you see some Jews are actually anti-Zionist.
Maybe those Jews have a thing for suicide. [/QUOTE]I don't run into a problem. Some Jews don't believe in the historic significance for Jewish people to have there own state, and it's their right. You, on the other hand, do not have the right to oppose the Jewish state. You don't have the skin in this, and it's not your business.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2888268]But this is just Xpartan and his Democratic name calling brain at work. If you are against the billions being poured down the drain in Ukraine, your sole reason for wanting that according to him is you love Putin and want to suck his dick.[/QUOTE]Well, I don't know whether or not you like sucking dicks, but if the glove fits-.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2888268]The worst though was the case of "never mind" with Covid. Do you remember all that stupid shit about how Republicans were going to die in droves with Covid and Dems were going to live?[/QUOTE]Yes.
[QUOTE]After May 1, 2021, when vaccines were available to all adults, the excess death rate gap between Republican and Democratic voters widened from −0. 9 percentage point (95% PI, −2. 5 to 0. 3 percentage points) to 7. 7 percentage points (95% PI, 6. 0-9. 3 percentage points) in the adjusted analysis; the excess death rate among Republican voters was 43% higher than the excess death rate among Democratic voters. [/QUOTE][URL]https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2807617[/URL]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2888268]Do you remember the idiotic anti-vax talk? Whatever happened to that? Xpartan, you are still getting your boosters right? Between you and John Clayton, what are you dummies up to now? Twenty boosters? Twenty five? How come you aren't calling people antivaxxers now? [/QUOTE]Indeed, it's time for the updated booster. Thanks for reminding me.
-
Not a more quintessentialliy "New York" Democrat
"No, it is about kissing the ass of the Wall Street Jews who are the biggest donors to the Democratic party.
The only time you Democrats support Democracy is when your side wins. The hypocrisy was on great display in Ukraine as we were supposed to be funding a Democracy as Zelensky was destroying it in Ukraine. Hell, the Democratic primaries are so corrupt that first Bernie Sanders got screwed. No less an authority than Donna Brazile had to call Bernie and tell him how badly Hiliary had cheated:
The latest "pro-Democracy" flap within the Democratic party involves RFK Jr. This is a Kennedy for God's sake. RFK Jr's uncle won an election so corrupt the dead in Illinois voted for his uncle. He took one look at the "pro-Democracy" Democratic primaries and declared himself an independent candidate. Because Democratic primaries are so rigged, guys like Bill Maher have taken to begging Biden not to run.
Quit giving us this crap about "Democracy" Tooms. Your goal in life is one party rule in the USA. If Israel were a dictatorship, Biden would be beside himself slobbering over and kissing the asses of its leader. ".
[URL]https://nypost.com/2024/01/24/metro/sicko-busted-in-nyc-rape-of-10-year-old-girl-he-met-on-bumble-sources/?utm_source=gmail&utm_campaign=android_nyp[/URL]
-
Bernie Could Have Become The Third Party President of Iowa Shouters
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2888503]"No, it is about kissing the ass of the Wall Street Jews who are the biggest donors to the Democratic party.
The only time you Democrats support Democracy is when your side wins. The hypocrisy was on great display in Ukraine as we were supposed to be funding a Democracy as Zelensky was destroying it in Ukraine. Hell, the Democratic primaries are so corrupt that first Bernie Sanders got screwed. No less an authority than Donna Brazile had to call Bernie and tell him how badly Hiliary had cheated: [URL]https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774/[/URL].
The latest "pro-Democracy" flap within the Democratic party involves RFK Jr. This is a Kennedy for God's sake. RFK Jr's uncle won an election so corrupt the dead in Illinois voted for his uncle. He took one look at the "pro-Democracy" Democratic primaries and declared himself an independent candidate. Because Democratic primaries are so rigged, guys like Bill Maher have taken to begging Biden not to run.
Quit giving us this crap about "Democracy" Tooms. Your goal in life is one party rule in the USA. If Israel were a dictatorship, Biden would be beside himself slobbering over and kissing the asses of its leader. "..[/QUOTE][B]Historically, do Iowa Caucus winners earn their party's nomination, become president?[/B][URL]https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2020/01/05/do-iowa-caucus-winners-win-presidency-party-nomination-general-election/4410195002/[/URL].
[QUOTE]Since 1972, caucus winners from both parties have become the nominee in the general election over half the time. But only three caucus winners went all the way to the White House.[/QUOTE]The winner of caucuses is usually the candidate with the loudest shouting supporters in the room at the time. It is not only undemocratic, it doesn't even have a better than random chance connection with the general election winner.
I mean, it is nothing as significant to predicting the winner of the General Election as the endorsement of both the AFL-CIO and the UAW:
[B]AFL-CIO Votes to Endorse President Biden for Re-Election.
June 16, 2023[/B]
[URL]https://aflcio.org/press/releases/afl-cio-votes-endorse-president-biden-re-election[/URL]#text=The%20 General%20 Board%20 of%20 the, for%20 re%2 Delection%20 in%202024.
[B]UAW, Fain endorse Biden, say Trump 'stands against everything we stand for'
Jan. 25, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-court-autoworkers-potential-endorsement-looms-2024-01-24/[/URL]
Lolol. Meanwhile, the occasions where Trump PLEADED to be bought by America's adversaries and enemies are innumerable. We are still uncovering them:
[B]Bolton says Trump asked China to help him get reelected.[/B]
[URL]https://apnews.com/article/ap-top-news-courts-john-bolton-politics-donald-trump-8a7ff9c4e60678aafcd7f430e49196ea[/URL]
[QUOTE]WASHINGTON (AP) President Donald Trump pleaded with Chinas Xi Jinping during a 2019 summit to help his reelection prospects, according to a scathing new book by former Trump adviser John Bolton that accuses the president of being driven by political calculations when making national security decisions.[/QUOTE][B]Five times Donald Trump looked to side with Russia against the US.
Former presidents statements about Russia and Putin often clash with those of US officials.[/B]
[URL]https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-russia-five-times-putin-b2021875.html[/URL]
[B]Trump says he got money from China and Saudi Arabia because he was doing services for them.[/B]
[URL]https://news.yahoo.com/trump-says-got-money-china-161202767.html[/URL]
Uh. I guess someone forgot to explain to Trumpty-Dumpty that as a so-called president he was only supposed to "serve" the United States of America and not to take payments from our adversaries and enemies to "serve" them.
-
More fine work from quintessentially So-Cal Democrats
"No, it is about kissing the ass of the Wall Street Jews who are the biggest donors to the Democratic party.
The only time you Democrats support Democracy is when your side wins. The hypocrisy was on great display in Ukraine as we were supposed to be funding a Democracy as Zelensky was destroying it in Ukraine. Hell, the Democratic primaries are so corrupt that first Bernie Sanders got screwed. No less an authority than Donna Brazile had to call Bernie and tell him how badly Hiliary had cheated:
The latest "pro-Democracy" flap within the Democratic party involves RFK Jr. This is a Kennedy for God's sake. RFK Jr's uncle won an election so corrupt the dead in Illinois voted for his uncle. He took one look at the "pro-Democracy" Democratic primaries and declared himself an independent candidate. Because Democratic primaries are so rigged, guys like Bill Maher have taken to begging Biden not to run.
Quit giving us this crap about "Democracy" Tooms. Your goal in life is one party rule in the USA. If Israel were a dictatorship, Biden would be beside himself slobbering over and kissing the asses of its leader. ".
[URL]https://nypost.com/2024/01/24/metro/sicko-busted-in-nyc-rape-of-10-year-old-girl-he-met-on-bumble-sources/?utm_source=gmail&utm_campaign=android_nyp[/URL]".
[URL]https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-01-23/los-angeles-unified-miramonte-teacher-mark-berndt-settlements[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2888544]I don't know if you feel about Jews.
I don't run into a problem. Some Jews don't believe in the historic significance for Jewish people to have there own state, and it's their right. You, on the other hand, do not have the right to oppose the Jewish state. You don't have the skin in this, and it's not your business.[/QUOTE]This is you in classic douche mode. I have not given an opinion on anything outside of your dumb comment than being against Israel and wanting all Jews dead are one in the same. And while your dumb ass blames me for everything, maybe you haven't noticed but a lot of Arab Democrats are not too happy with your moronic POV that there is no reason to be against Israel while it slaughters so many.
I think you mistake my having an opinion with the joy I have of watching Democrats tear themselves apart over the issue. I don't have a dog in the fight, but I sure love watching you guys tear yourselves up. Hell, even the president of Harvard went down in flames on this issue. He he.
And yeah, you need another booster. Keep 'them coming. Pfizer needs all the help it can get now.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2888395][URL]https://www.aol.com/news/house-jan-6-committee-deleted-091722484.html[/URL]
The whole sham committee needs to be lined up in front of a firing squad.[/QUOTE]I don't know what is worse MDS. That these assholes rigged this whole committee and spent all this money on an "investigation" to get their predetermined outcome and deleted anything that did not fit that predetermined outcome or that this is not a surprise at all.
After Covid, Russiagate, the inside job on the Whimer assination, Ukrainegate, the lab leak being "conspiracy theory", and all the other evil shit they have done is there any part of these douches who say, "Hey, maybe we have gone too far"?
You and I know both know if Trump were in office the Ukraine war never would have happened, but somehow Biden wormed his way out of getting blame on that one.
Israel is a super complicated issue, and I do not have an opinion on how best it should be handled, but I can say Biden slobbering over Israel while it kills thousands of innocent people is definitely not the best way to have handled things. I am just relieved that the Democratic douches have crossed one line where there have finally been consequences.
With Covid, with the impeachments, with 1-6, and all their bullshit, there has and will be no consequences.
-
That Damn Biden
Now that we know what the Trump / Repub campaign platform is, namely to Hope For An Economic Crash, Shrug Off And Ignore Their Previously Claimed "Border Crisis" , Outlaw Sex For Pleasure Across The Nation and Support and Defend Putin's And Any Other Authoritarian Dictator's Mission To Destroy Democracy Around The World, here is what Joe Biden has been busy working to accomplish:
[B]USA Economy grew at a 3. 3% pace in the fourth quarter, much better than expected.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/25/gdp-q4-2023-the-us-economy-grew-at-a-3point3percent-pace-in-the-fourth-quarter.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]GDP, a measure of all the goods and services produced, increased at a 3.3% annualized rate in the fourth quarter of 2023. Wall Street had been looking for a 2% gain.
The U.S. economy for all of 2023 accelerated at a 2.5% annualized pace, well ahead of the Wall Street outlook at the beginning of the year for few if any gains and better than the 1.9% increase in 2022.
A strong pace of consumer spending helped drive the expansion, as did government spending.
There also was progress on inflation. Core prices for personal consumption expenditures rose 2% for the period, while the headline rate was 1.7%.[/QUOTE]Or, as Winger / Repubs pitch it on typically pro Repub MSM, "Biden and the Dems are destroying America and the Economy"!
Uh. When Repubs see this kind of thing happening under Dem policies and stewardship, which they generally do whenever a Dem has taken over in the midst of still another Great Repub Historic And Unprecedented Economic Disaster, their usual response is something like, "Oh my God, this is horrible! Elect us and we promise to Turn This Ecomomy Around"!
Believe them.
They are just the Party to do it.
They have had lots and lots and lots of practice doing it.
-
Lol
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2888753]"No, it is about kissing the ass of the Wall Street Jews who are the biggest donors to the Democratic party.
The only time you Democrats support Democracy is when your side wins. The hypocrisy was on great display in Ukraine as we were supposed to be funding a Democracy as Zelensky was destroying it in Ukraine. Hell, the Democratic primaries are so corrupt that first Bernie Sanders got screwed. No less an authority than Donna Brazile had to call Bernie and tell him how badly Hiliary had cheated:
The latest "pro-Democracy" flap within the Democratic party involves RFK Jr. This is a Kennedy for God's sake. RFK Jr's uncle won an election so corrupt the dead in Illinois voted for his uncle. He took one look at the "pro-Democracy" Democratic primaries and declared himself an independent candidate. Because Democratic primaries are so rigged, guys like Bill Maher have taken to begging Biden not to run.
Quit giving us this crap about "Democracy" Tooms. Your goal in life is one party rule in the USA. If Israel were a dictatorship, Biden would be beside himself slobbering over and kissing the asses of its leader. ".
[URL]https://nypost.com/2024/01/24/metro/sicko-busted-in-nyc-rape-of-10-year-old-girl-he-met-on-bumble-sources/?utm_source=gmail&utm_campaign=android_nyp[/URL]".
[URL]https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-01-23/los-angeles-unified-miramonte-teacher-mark-berndt-settlements[/URL][/QUOTE]Let me guess. These links to itemized crimes are supposed to convince someone other than yourself that no crimes occur in Red States, Red Cities or The Entire Country under Repub so-called potuses or that any one of those linked crimes is worse than Trump's Mass Murder of about a Million Americans due to his horrific Economic and National Security Policies and Srewardship as well as his plots, plans, intimidation, threats, bribes and attempts to overturn a free and fair American election and overthrow American democracy, right?
Uh. It isn't working.
-
Nutjob Repubs\Conservatives are now banning Dictionaries...
Yes, Dictionaries are now being banned in Florida. This is how "NUTs" the Republican Florida legislative bodies have become. And I'm sure other RED STATES will follow, given their callous history of
abusing American rights and their [i]"monkey see, monkey do",[/i] zombie red state laws.
Florida Schools pulls dictionaries, because they [b]"Describe Sexual Content".[/b] The dictionaries' definition of words, such as "SEX", would potentially put them in violation of the law, which placed restrictions on children being taught about sexual conduct.
Dictionaries in Florida apparently contravene, a law DeSantis passed into law in 2023, which states "Depicts or describes sexual conduct as s.847.001(19)..."
[b]Dictionaries among books removed from shelves of Florida school...[/b]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2024/01/11/escambia-dictionaries-removed/[/URL]
Instead of banning dictionaries, perhaps they should have given one to the fmr. (FL) Republican Chair, Christian Zielger (and wife Bridget), to lookup the meaning of the words, "hypocrisy", "consensual", "sex", and then the word "rape".
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2888337][b]Repubs: More Military Combat Level Weapons in the hands of more Americans, Please[/b]
You know the NRA-Servant Repubs' mantra: "Guns don't kill children. Bullets fired out of Military Combat Level Repub Guns kill children. Lots and lots of them. Very quickly. And we love it. " ... [/QUOTE]
YES, With the [i]"more guns and ammo"[/i] mantras, the bans on woman's abortion/health rights and the burning/banning of books, including the dictionary, one can only conclude, QAnon\MAGA Repubs don't want to make America GREAT, they simply want to make Americas IDIOTS (especially their base), or:[LIST] docile dummies, that are;[/LIST][LIST] gullible, half-witted, dumb as fuck and;[/LIST][LIST] mindless automatons;[/LIST]
Whose [b]"conservative pockets"[/b] are easily picked and manipulated, by their pathetic [b]"leaders", that are willing to KILL[/b], at slightest whiff of "disloyalty", or "deviation" from QAnon\MAGA Repub doctrine.
So when the 2x impeached, 4x indicted, insurrectionist fmr. loser president, says [i][b]"I love the Poorly Educated..."[/b][/i] BELIEVE HIM!
-
?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2888761]You and I know both know if Trump were in office the Ukraine war never would have happened..[/QUOTE]Hardly, as Trump praised the invasion calling it "savvy" and a "stroke of genius. " he also supported appeasement in accepting the Russian annexation of Crimea. Russia has long been clear in their desire to restore lost empire. Putin and Russia have had no greater friend than Trump. Here's a good article with some excellent imbedded links.
[URL]https://thehill.com/opinion/international/596662-no-trump-would-not-have-stopped-russias-invasion-of-ukraine/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2888761]but somehow Biden wormed his way out of getting blame on that one. [/QUOTE]How can you say that? You certainly blame him, and there's no shortage of others that think like you.
-
Lmao
"Historically, do Iowa Caucus winners earn their party's nomination, become president? [URL]https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2020/01/05/do-iowa-caucus-winners-win-presidency-party-nomination-general-election/4410195002/[/URL].
The winner of caucuses is usually the candidate with the loudest shouting supporters in the room at the time. It is not only undemocratic, it doesn't even have a better than random chance connection with the general election winner.
I mean, it is nothing as significant to predicting the winner of the General Election as the endorsement of both the AFL-CIO and the UAW:
AFL-CIO Votes to Endorse President Biden for Re-Election.
June 16,2023.
[URL]https://aflcio.org/press/releases/afl-cio-votes-endorse-president-biden-re-election[/URL]#text=The%20 General%20 Board%20 of%20 the, for%20 re%2 Delection%20 in%202024.
UAW, Fain endorse Biden, say Trump 'stands against everything we stand for'.
Jan. 25,2024.
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-court-autoworkers-potential-endorsement-looms-2024-01-24/[/URL]
Lolol. Meanwhile, the occasions where Trump pleaded to be bought by America's adversaries and enemies are innumerable. We are still uncovering them:
Uh. I guess someone forgot to explain to Trumpty-Dumpty that as a so-called president he was only supposed to "serve" the United States of America and not to take payments from our adversaries and enemies to "serve" them."
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/01/25/uaw-president-great-majority-union-workers-will-not-vote-biden/[/URL]
The best endorsement of all.
Why would he say this and not keep it to himself? LMAO.
-
Au contraire
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2888757]This is you in classic douche mode. I have not given an opinion on anything outside of your dumb comment than being against Israel and wanting all Jews dead are one in the same. And while your dumb ass blames me for everything, maybe you haven't noticed but a lot of Arab Democrats are not too happy with your moronic POV that there is no reason to be against Israel while it slaughters so many.[/QUOTE]Thank you for your unusually condensed response, albeit chaotic as always.
See, in order to perform a successful sleight of hand, one has to be skilled, or, at least, not lazy. You, dear Elvis, are neither skilled nor "not lazy". Hence the reasons why your rhetorical ploys are so ineffective.
I've never said you "wanted all Jews dead". Instead I gave you a benefit of doubt stating "I don't know if you feel about Jews as strongly as Hitler did."
I'm aware not all anti-Semites want "all Jews dead". The problem is, though, hatred for the state of Israel and refusal to recognize the unspeakable Oct 7 atrocities that caused the fully justified Israel's response are pure and undeniable signs of anti-Semitism.
You can play with semantics and portray yourself as "anti-Israel" or "anti-Zionist" all you want. You're still nothing more than an anti-Semite who's seen yet another opening.
Time to celebrate your newly-found alignment with Arab Democrats, I guess.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2888915]"Historically, do Iowa Caucus winners earn their party's nomination, become president? [URL]https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2020/01/05/do-iowa-caucus-winners-win-presidency-party-nomination-general-election/4410195002/[/URL].
The winner of caucuses is usually the candidate with the loudest shouting supporters in the room at the time. It is not only undemocratic, it doesn't even have a better than random chance connection with the general election winner.
I mean, it is nothing as significant to predicting the winner of the General Election as the endorsement of both the AFL-CIO and the UAW:
AFL-CIO Votes to Endorse President Biden for Re-Election.
June 16,2023.
[URL]https://aflcio.org/press/releases/afl-cio-votes-endorse-president-biden-re-election[/URL]#text=The%20 General%20 Board%20 of%20 the, for%20 re%2 Delection%20 in%202024.
UAW, Fain endorse Biden, say Trump 'stands against everything we stand for'.
Jan. 25,2024.
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-court-autoworkers-potential-endorsement-looms-2024-01-24/[/URL]
Lolol. Meanwhile, the occasions where Trump pleaded to be bought by America's adversaries and enemies are innumerable. We are still uncovering them:
Uh. I guess someone forgot to explain to Trumpty-Dumpty that as a so-called president he was only supposed to "serve" the United States of America and not to take payments from our adversaries and enemies to "serve" them."
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/01/25/uaw-president-great-majority-union-workers-will-not-vote-biden/[/URL]
The best endorsement of all.
Why would he say this and not keep it to himself? LMAO.[/QUOTE]Why would he say that? Because an "economy that works for" gas powered automobile factory workers is crap for everyone else unless you enjoy blowing Russians and Arabs for your paycheck going forward.
Both Fain and Biden are taking the country and the economy into a better future despite many auto workers, perhaps a majority, much preferring to join Trump kneeling between the legs of Russians and Arabs for their pay whenever necessary.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2888918] The problem is, though, hatred for the state of Israel and refusal to recognize the unspeakable Oct 7 atrocities that caused the fully justified Israel's response are pure.[/QUOTE]25,000 dead Palestinians, 100,000 injured, and Hamas is still at large, and you are like this was fully justified? Is there any war you do not like? Hell, a UN court said Israel must stop its killing.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2888918]You're still nothing more than an anti-Semite who's seen yet another opening.[/QUOTE]Oh, is that from the Wall Street Jews comment? It is true that those are the big money men with the Dems, but there are Republicans Jews who are big money too like Sheldon Adleson's family. But if you are going to call me an anti-semite, I should ask you why you want all Arabs dead.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2888918]Time to celebrate your newly-found alignment with Arab Democrats, I guess.[/QUOTE]Unlike you, I don't celebrate deaths. This was a tragedy on both sides. Raping and killing women at a dance rave is as cowardly and disgusting an act as there is. I had hoped Israel would not overreact like we did after 9-11 but they have and then some.
As for Israel, I could give a fuck about it. We do not need Middle Eastern oil anymore, and IMO we should just get the fuck out of the Middle East all together. So as far as you and all your anti-Zionist ramblings, I could care less. In fact, the only thing I care about is pulling out all the aid out of the region and spending that money back home. These people have been at each other's necks for millennia and we are not going to solve anything no matter how much we spend.
-
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2888913]Russia has long been clear in their desire to restore lost empire. Putin and Russia have had no greater friend than Trump. Here's a good article with some excellent imbedded links.
[URL]https://thehill.com/opinion/international/596662-no-trump-would-not-have-stopped-russias-invasion-of-ukraine/[/URL][/QUOTE]For over a decade, Putin has made clear that he views the collapse of the Soviet Union as the "greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century. " As a former KGB intelligence officer, Putin laments the demise of the Soviet empire and is deeply consumed by a desire to restore Russia to some semblance of its former greatness. Indeed, the former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, declared that "Putin's main interest is to try to restore the old Soviet Union. ".
I thought a black American on here made a great joke about the term African American. He said next time a black American is called African American ask them to name ten countries in Africa. He said of all the people he asked, not one he asked could do it.
If you are going to say Putin wants to take back the Soviet Union, can you name all the former Soviet Republics? My bet is not one of these neocon hacks could do so.
So I looked one up, Tajikistan. It is 96% Muslim, and their GDP per capita is less than one-tenth that of Russia, and we cannot let Russia take this country? Hell, if we wanted to fuck Russia over, we should beg them to take it. It would be like the USA taking over El Salvador or Nicaragua. That is a lot more likely IMO to hurt us than help us. I cannot even construct the wildest scenario in which Russia, a predominantly Christian nation, taking over a poor as shit country with ten million Muslims ends well.
And of course, you are forgetting my first hand experience. Like I said, I saw with my own fucking eyes what Biden was doing with military shipments abroad from day fucking one. My understanding is that Biden's belief is that no presidential incumbent who is fighting a war has not been re-elected. He even let slip that he wanted the American military engaging with Russia.
The part that amazes me with you guys is you learn nothing. I think you still believe all that Russiagate bullshit is true. Hell, we just had this fool Xpartan go off about getting a Covid booster. Don't you guys know that Russiagate was complete fucking bullshit? Don't you know that we can read what the "experts" said privately about Covid was completely different than what they said in public?
That fucker Fauci literally went from saying no one should wear a mask, to everyone should wear one, to everyone should wear two, and instead of laughing at how stupid he was, you guys all fell down at his feet worshiping him, and it is the same with these neocon "experts". Can't you guys think critically?
-
Repubs proclaim: "Up is Down" and WE don't need no "stinkin' dictionaries"
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2888849]Now that we know what the Trump / Repub campaign platform is, namely to Hope For An Economic Crash, Shrug Off And Ignore Their Previously Claimed "Border Crisis" , Outlaw Sex For Pleasure Across The Nation and Support and Defend Putin's And Any Other Authoritarian Dictator's Mission To Destroy Democracy Around The World, here is what Joe Biden has been busy working to accomplish:
[B]USA Economy grew at a 3. 3% pace in the fourth quarter, much better than expected.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/25/gdp-q4-2023-the-us-economy-grew-at-a-3point3percent-pace-in-the-fourth-quarter.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Repubs have definitely [b]lost all sense of "reality".[/b]
In their economic MAGA world, (ie. commonly known as Earth #2), it would seem [i]"up is down"[/i] and [i]"down is up"[/i], better than expected, or blistering economic growth of Q4 at 3.3% and record new highs on the DJI and S&P 500, are just all signals/indicators [i](to the Trumpified "poorly educated" MAGA economists)[/i], that the American economy is in a RECESSION!
[b]The S&P 500 hits a new record high : NPR[/b]
[URL]https://www.npr.org/2024/01/19/1225725081/wall-street-sp-500-record-high-stocks-tech-economy-inflation-interest-rates[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/01/22/business/magnificent-seven-stocks-tech.html[/URL]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2888849]Uh. When Repubs see this kind of thing happening under Dem policies and stewardship, which they generally do whenever a Dem has taken over in the midst of still another Great Repub Historic And Unprecedented Economic Disaster, their usual response is something like, "Oh my God, this is horrible! [b][u]Elect us and we promise to Turn This Economy Around"![/u][/b]
Believe them.
They are just the Party to do it.
They have had lots and lots and lots of practice doing it.[/QUOTE]
Yes indeed...Repubs do [i]"believe"[/i], that they are the party, [i]"to turn around a things around!"[/i] After all, [i]"up is down"[/i], in their world (...kkkk!)
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2888849]Or, as Winger / Repubs pitch it on typically pro Repub MSM, [b]"Biden and the Dems are destroying America and the Economy"![/b] [/QUOTE]
As per my last post, perhaps this is why Repubs and Conservatives, want to ban dictionaries, of all things. To them, IGNORANCE is indeed BLISS!!!
BTW, what better way, [i][b]"to pick the pockets"[/b][/i] of the uninitiated conservatives and the [i]"poorly educated"[/i] and hugely misinformed, Repub base.
-
I'm guessing it also applies to all unions and all Americans
"Why would he say that? Because an "economy that works for" gas powered automobile factory workers is crap for everyone else unless you enjoy blowing Russians and Arabs for your paycheck going forward.
Both Fain and Biden are taking the country and the economy into a better future despite many auto workers, perhaps a majority, much preferring to join Trump kneeling between the legs of Russians and Arabs for their pay whenever necessary."
Get rid of scumbag Joe he should never of been installed and its way past his expiration date.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/01/26/exclusive-defeat-maga-meet-the-radical-left-network-that-hijacked-democrats-in-effort-to-stop-trump-at-all-costs/[/URL]
And him saying it out loud is just encouraging it and giving it tacit approval.
I'm also guessing he to will vote for Our Lord and Savior as will all white Americans with at least half of a brain.
-
Revisionist History is fun for you, huh? LOL
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2889161]For over a decade, Putin has made clear that he views the collapse of the Soviet Union as the "greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century. " As a former KGB intelligence officer, Putin laments the demise of the Soviet empire and is deeply consumed by a desire to restore Russia to some semblance of its former greatness. Indeed, the former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, declared that "Putin's main interest is to try to restore the old Soviet Union. ".
I thought a black American on here made a great joke about the term African American. He said next time a black American is called African American ask them to name ten countries in Africa. He said of all the people he asked, not one he asked could do it.
If you are going to say Putin wants to take back the Soviet Union, can you name all the former Soviet Republics? My bet is not one of these neocon hacks could do so.
So I looked one up, Tajikistan. It is 96% Muslim, and their GDP per capita is less than one-tenth that of Russia, and we cannot let Russia take this country? Hell, if we wanted to fuck Russia over, we should beg them to take it. It would be like the USA taking over El Salvador or Nicaragua. That is a lot more likely IMO to hurt us than help us. I cannot even construct the wildest scenario in which Russia, a predominantly Christian nation, taking over a poor as shit country with ten million Muslims ends well.
And of course, you are forgetting my first hand experience. Like I said, I saw with my own fucking eyes what Biden was doing with military shipments abroad from day fucking one. [B]My understanding is that Biden's belief is that no presidential incumbent who is fighting a war has not been re-elected.[/b] He even let slip that he wanted the American military engaging with Russia.
The part that amazes me with you guys is you learn nothing. I think you still believe all that Russiagate bullshit is true. Hell, we just had this fool Xpartan go off about getting a Covid booster. Don't you guys know that Russiagate was complete fucking bullshit? Don't you know that we can read what the "experts" said privately about Covid was completely different than what they said in public?
[B]That fucker Fauci literally went from saying no one should wear a mask, to everyone should wear one,[/b] to everyone should wear two, and instead of laughing at how stupid he was, you guys all fell down at his feet worshiping him, and it is the same with these neocon "experts". Can't you guys think critically?[/QUOTE]In order for that to be Biden's belief he would have to be as addle-brained and ignorant of history and very recent events as Trump. And we all know nobody is as addle-brained and ignorant as Trump.
Biden is not "fighting a war" and neither is any branch of the USA Military under his command.
Now, Trump was "fighting a war" and so was the USA Military under his command for every minute of every hour of every day of Trump's so-called presidency. How did the 2020 Presidential election turn out for that incumbent?
Uh. Fauci did not sound the alarm for every American to run to the nearest drug store and buy up every mask in stock when his so-called president was assuring the world of this:
[B]Trump says he trusts Chinas Xi on coronavirus and the US has it totally under control.
Jan. 22, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/22/trump-on-coronavirus-from-china-we-have-it-totally-under-control.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]"Its one person coming in from China. We have it under control. Its going to be just fine, Trump told CNBCs Joe Kernen from the World Economic Forum in Davos.
The president said he trusts the information coming out of China on the coronavirus, which has killed nine people there and sickened hundreds more.
The coronavirus evoked memories of the 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in China. SARS killed nearly 800 people worldwide and led to an economic downturn in the region.[/QUOTE]See, Fauci, along with practically every other infectious disease expert on the planet changed his tune on that as soon as he and the rest of the world realized that fucker Trump was either lying about his Pandemic in perfect sync with Xi or was merely a total sucker to "trust the information coming out of China", the bullshit Xi was shoveling down his soon-to-be-blocked-in-deep-Covid-19 throat.
-
Well, no, it wouldn't.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2889240][b]I'm guessing it also applies to all unions and all Americans[/b]
"Why would he say that? Because an "economy that works for" gas powered automobile factory workers is crap for everyone else unless you enjoy blowing Russians and Arabs for your paycheck going forward.
Both Fain and Biden are taking the country and the economy into a better future despite many auto workers, perhaps a majority, much preferring to join Trump kneeling between the legs of Russians and Arabs for their pay whenever necessary."
Get rid of scumbag Joe he should never of been installed and its way past his expiration date.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/01/26/exclusive-defeat-maga-meet-the-radical-left-network-that-hijacked-democrats-in-effort-to-stop-trump-at-all-costs/[/URL]
And him saying it out loud is just encouraging it and giving it tacit approval.
I'm also guessing he to will vote for Our Lord and Savior as will all white Americans with at least half of a brain.[/QUOTE]Many and perhaps most factory workers who produce gas powered automobiles have a vested interest in keeping America smoking Russian and Arab pole far into the future, as Trump would have us do. However, that isn't necessarily true of other unions.
The ones who do choose to smoke Russian and Arab pole for next week's paycheck, the Trump voters, are also missing the fact that Dem leaders like Joe Biden will make the necessary transition to EVs as painless and smooth as possible. It isn't like a Dem is going to produce a Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction in one of the Repubs' patented "Once in 100 Years Disasters" or Great Repub Depression where a whole bunch of paychecks for a whole bunch of Americans go missing for a whole bunch of times.
Damn, Biden has already produced so many jobs and therefore job opportunities with higher wages that even with plenty of new workers entering the country there is still almost 2 jobs available for every applicant in the market for a job. Disgruntled UAW members included.
-
Did you just call someone a revisionist?
"In order for that to be Biden's belief he would have to be as addle-brained and ignorant of history and very recent events as Trump. And we all know nobody is as addle-brained and ignorant as Trump.
Biden is not "fighting a war" and neither is any branch of the USA Military under his command.
Now, Trump was "fighting a war" and so was the USA Military under his command for every minute of every hour of every day of Trump's so-called presidency. How did the 2020 Presidential election turn out for that incumbent?
Uh. Fauci did not sound the alarm for every American to run to the nearest drug store and buy up every mask in stock when his so-called president was assuring the world of this:
Trump says he trusts Chinas Xi on coronavirus and the US has it totally under control.
Jan. 22,2020.
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/22/trump-on-coronavirus-from-china-we-have-it-totally-under-control.html?__source=androidappshar[/URL]
See, Fauci, along with practically every other infectious disease expert on the planet changed his tune on that as soon as he and the rest of the world realized that fucker Trump was either lying about his Pandemic in perfect sync with Xi or was merely a total sucker to "trust the information coming out of China", the bullshit Xi was shoveling down his soon-to-be-blocked-in-deep-Covid-19 throat. ".
[URL]https://youtube.com/shorts/di0JLnolxC0?si=pJW_c9qI_WaEx4KW[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889263]In order for that to be Biden's belief he would have to be as addle-brained and ignorant of history and very recent events as Trump. And we all know nobody is as addle-brained and ignorant as Trump.
Biden is not "fighting a war" and neither is any branch of the USA Military under his command.[/QUOTE]Sigh.
[URL]https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/u-s-military-launches-another-barrage-of-missiles-against-houthi-sites-in-yemen-ap-sources-say[/URL]
The USA Military fired another wave of ship- and submarine-launch missile strikes against Houthi-controlled sites Wednesday, USA Officials said, marking the fourth time in days it has directly targeted the group in Yemen.
[URL]https://usafacts.org/articles/how-much-money-has-the-us-given-ukraine-since-russias-invasion/[/URL]
The US has allocated $113.4 billion in emergency funding to support Ukraine, American partners in regions affected by the conflict, and US national security programs.
[URL]https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2023/04/18/just-how-many-us-troops-and-spies-do-we-have-in-ukraine/[/URL]
According to the document there were 97 special forces from NATO countries operating in Ukraine as of March, including 14 USA Special forces.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889263]See, Fauci, along with practically every other infectious disease expert on the planet changed his tune on that as soon as he and the rest of the world realized that fucker Trump was either lying about his Pandemic in perfect sync with Xi or was merely a total sucker to "trust the information coming out of China", the bullshit Xi was shoveling down his soon-to-be-blocked-in-deep-Covid-19 throat.[/QUOTE]And now the latest Fauci video: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-OqyUtDar4[/URL].
The way it works Tooms is guys like Fauci are supposed to be advising Trump. What you had was a guy like Fauci who created the pandemic lying his ass off about it to everyone including Trump.
Seeing as how your goal in life is the USA as China and one party rule, everything good is due to Democrats and everything bad is due to Republicans even when those doing good or bad are often supposed to be apolitical.
I have to wonder though when you make completely stupid comments like the USA is not at war with anyone, I hope you are getting paid and are really not that stupid. I doubt it, but that is my hope.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2889074]25,000 dead Palestinians, 100,000 injured, and Hamas is still at large, and you are like this was fully justified? Is there any war you do not like? Hell, a UN court said Israel must stop its killing.[/QUOTE]1. Yes. But since you're such a great strategist, go ahead and teach IDF generals how to go gently on an enemy who butcher people in the most horrific way since the medieval times; who on purpose embed themselves with civilians; who hide in schools, mosques and hospitals; and who celebrate deaths of Palestinian children because it helps them to elicit sympathy from morons and anti-Semites like yourself.
2. Fuck the UN court and fuck the UN. If they hadn't designated the so-called "Palestinians" as ETERNAL victims (thus extending the conflict for decades because why not play along while getting billions of dollars in international aid) none of the last decades of terror and misery would've happened.
And fuck you too. You would never demand from another country what you're demanding from Israel, you hypocrite!
[QUOTE]The UN nurtures Palestinian grievances rather than resolving conflict
The UN maintains numerous bodies that prolong and exacerbate tensions rather than resolve the long-running conflict. Whereas all other refugees in the world fall under the jurisdiction of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the UN has a Palestinian-specific refugee agency, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). By conferring refugee status on descendants of actual refugees, something not done for any other population, UNRWA has increased the population under its care from 700,000 in 1948 to 5.9 million today. This figure includes more than 2.3 million Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, counted as refugees despite living in lands Palestinians claim for a future state. By promoting a fictitious Palestinian right to claim land in Israel and not offering resettlement as an option, UNRWA helps make the refugee issue intractable.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2023/11/16/10-things-to-know-about-the-un-and-hamas/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2889074]Oh, is that from the Wall Street Jews comment? It is true that those are the big money men with the Dems, but there are Republicans Jews who are big money too like Sheldon Adleson's family. But if you are going to call me an anti-semite, I should ask you why you want all Arabs dead.[/QUOTE]The truth: You ARE an anti-Semite. I don't want all Arabs dead.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2889074]Unlike you, I don't celebrate deaths. This was a tragedy on both sides. Raping and killing women at a dance rave is as cowardly and disgusting an act as there is. I had hoped Israel would not overreact like we did after 9-11 but they have and then some.[/QUOTE]Overfuckingreact? What would be an adequate reaction, then? Sing Imagine and hug each other? Again, please enlighten us. What would you have done?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2889074]As for Israel, I could give a fuck about it. We do not need Middle Eastern oil anymore, and IMO we should just get the fuck out of the Middle East all together. So as far as you and all your anti-Zionist ramblings, I could care less. In fact, the only thing I care about is pulling out all the aid out of the region and spending that money back home. These people have been at each other's necks for millennia and we are not going to solve anything no matter how much we spend.[/QUOTE]My anti-Zionist ramblings? Get some help. Promptly.
-
I couldn't imagine anything more ignorant.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2889161]
So I looked one up, Tajikistan. It is 96% Muslim, and their GDP per capita is less than one-tenth that of Russia, and we cannot let Russia take this country? Hell, if we wanted to fuck Russia over, we should beg them to take it. It would be like the USA taking over El Salvador or Nicaragua. That is a lot more likely IMO to hurt us than help us. I cannot even construct the wildest scenario in which Russia, a predominantly Christian nation, taking over a poor as shit country with ten million Muslims ends well.[/QUOTE]OMFG!
Leaving aside your complete lack of empathy ([B]"let Russia take this country" -- what's wrong with you?[/B]) -- what makes you believe that Russia would be fucked by re-occupying its former Central Asian colonies? When European countries colonized Africa and Asia, did they care about their GDP? Or did they just grab and rob natural resources and manpower to enrich themselves and seize global geopolitical advantages?
My goodness, what did your parents do to you? Did you even go to school?
-
Wtffffffffff
"Many and perhaps most factory workers who produce gas powered automobiles have a vested interest in keeping America smoking Russian and Arab pole far into the future, as Trump would have us do. However, that isn't necessarily true of other unions.
The ones who do choose to smoke Russian and Arab pole for next week's paycheck, the Trump voters, are also missing the fact that Dem leaders like Joe Biden will make the necessary transition to EVs as painless and smooth as possible. It isn't like a Dem is going to produce a Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction in one of the Repubs' patented "Once in 100 Years Disasters" or Great Repub Depression where a whole bunch of paychecks for a whole bunch of Americans go missing for a whole bunch of times.
Damn, Biden has already produced so many jobs and therefore job opportunities with higher wages that even with plenty of new workers entering the country there is still almost 2 jobs available for every applicant in the market for a job. Disgruntled UAW members included. ".
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/21/strange-tale-about-why-bill-clinton-said-nafta-would-create-million-jobs/[/URL]
-
"Sigh.
[URL]https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/u-s-military-launches-another-barrage-of-missiles-against-houthi-sites-in-yemen-ap-sources-say[/URL]
The USA Military fired another wave of ship- and submarine-launch missile strikes against Houthi-controlled sites Wednesday, USA Officials said, marking the fourth time in days it has directly targeted the group in Yemen.
[URL]https://usafacts.org/articles/how-much-money-has-the-us-given-ukraine-since-russias-invasion/[/URL]
The US has allocated $113.4 billion in emergency funding to support Ukraine, American partners in regions affected by the conflict, and US national security programs.
[URL]https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2023/04/18/just-how-many-us-troops-and-spies-do-we-have-in-ukraine/[/URL]
According to the document there were 97 special forces from NATO countries operating in Ukraine as of March, including 14 USA Special forces.
And now the latest Fauci video:
The way it works Tooms is guys like Fauci are supposed to be advising Trump. What you had was a guy like Fauci who created the pandemic lying his ass off about it to everyone including Trump.
Seeing as how your goal in life is the USA as China and one party rule, everything good is due to Democrats and everything bad is due to Republicans even when those doing good or bad are often supposed to be apolitical.
I have to wonder though when you make completely stupid comments like the USA is not at war with anyone, I hope you are getting paid and are really not that stupid. I doubt it, but that is my hope. ".
[URL]https://amgreatness.com/2024/01/26/the-lefts-ridiculous-disinformation-on-tainted-zuck-bucks/[/URL]
-
Yes, sigh, indeed
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2889373]Sigh.
[URL]https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/u-s-military-launches-another-barrage-of-missiles-against-houthi-sites-in-yemen-ap-sources-say[/URL]
The USA Military fired another wave of ship- and submarine-launch missile strikes against Houthi-controlled sites Wednesday, USA Officials said, marking the fourth time in days it has directly targeted the group in Yemen.
[URL]https://usafacts.org/articles/how-much-money-has-the-us-given-ukraine-since-russias-invasion/[/URL]
The US has allocated $113.4 billion in emergency funding to support Ukraine, American partners in regions affected by the conflict, and US national security programs.
[URL]https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2023/04/18/just-how-many-us-troops-and-spies-do-we-have-in-ukraine/[/URL]
According to the document there were 97 special forces from NATO countries operating in Ukraine as of March, including 14 USA Special forces.
And now the latest Fauci video: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-OqyUtDar4[/URL].
The way it works Tooms is guys like Fauci are supposed to be advising Trump. What you had was a guy like Fauci who created the pandemic lying his ass off about it to everyone including Trump.
Seeing as how your goal in life is the USA as China and one party rule, everything good is due to Democrats and everything bad is due to Republicans even when those doing good or bad are often supposed to be apolitical.
I have to wonder though when you make completely stupid comments like the USA is not at war with anyone, I hope you are getting paid and are really not that stupid. I doubt it, but that is my hope.[/QUOTE]That is not a war. That is a retaliation. Trump did the same thing. So are you now arguing that Trump "fought TWO or THREE wars at once"?
Please look up a few definitions of "war. ".
None of those retaliations by Trump, Biden and other presidents are listed on any historical record as "wars. ".
And, no, taking sides and providing aid or support for other countries at war is also not "fighting a war". If it were then virtually every POTUS in modern history was a Wartime President and, according to your claim of Biden's belief, would have been re-elected handily. Eisenhower's Vietnam War at least had troops on the ground taking fire and coming back in body bags as well as it eventually becoming our war directly. Nothing like what is happening in Ukraine.
And, no, Fauci was not ahead of Trump in being privy to intel on China. He did not lie to Trump and tell him China only had "15 cases" in January 2020. Trump lied to Fauci and you and me and everyone within earshot about Trump's Pandemic, not the other way around.
If Fauci was higher in the chain of command and Intel on what was happening in China or anywhere else in the world including the USA, the economy and national security of the USA from January 20,2017 to January 20,2021 would have been a hell of a lot better than it was.
-
Nope
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2889370]"In order for that to be Biden's belief he would have to be as addle-brained and ignorant of history and very recent events as Trump. And we all know nobody is as addle-brained and ignorant as Trump.
Biden is not "fighting a war" and neither is any branch of the USA Military under his command.
Now, Trump was "fighting a war" and so was the USA Military under his command for every minute of every hour of every day of Trump's so-called presidency. How did the 2020 Presidential election turn out for that incumbent?
Uh. Fauci did not sound the alarm for every American to run to the nearest drug store and buy up every mask in stock when his so-called president was assuring the world of this:
Trump says he trusts Chinas Xi on coronavirus and the US has it totally under control.
Jan. 22,2020.
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/22/trump-on-coronavirus-from-china-we-have-it-totally-under-control.html?__source=androidappshar[/URL]
See, Fauci, along with practically every other infectious disease expert on the planet changed his tune on that as soon as he and the rest of the world realized that fucker Trump was either lying about his Pandemic in perfect sync with Xi or was merely a total sucker to "trust the information coming out of China", the bullshit Xi was shoveling down his soon-to-be-blocked-in-deep-Covid-19 throat. ".
[URL]https://youtube.com/shorts/di0JLnolxC0?si=pJW_c9qI_WaEx4KW[/URL][/QUOTE]Uh. Trump is the one who made funding for sanctuary cities *poof* go away. The host of that video of yours is obviously an ignorant numbskull:
[B]Biden Moves to End Trumps War on Sanctuary Cities
May 4, 2021[/B]
[URL]https://immigrationimpact.com/2021/05/04/biden-sanctuary-city-policy/[/URL]
[QUOTE]
The Biden administration has ended a Trump-era policy of denying so-called sanctuary cities from receiving certain forms of federal funding. The policy had been used in retaliation against local and state governments who did not cooperate fully with federal immigration enforcement. Many courts had already ruled against these funding restrictions.[/QUOTE]LOL. In fact, since ignorant numbskulls like that guy in your video can't argue that Biden changed his stand on funding sanctuary cities, they shifted the argument that his doing so "helps illegal immigrants". LOL. Priceless. I guess you missed that Winger move:
[B]Biden sends $200 million in tax funds to sanctuary cities helping illegal immigrants.
June 12, 2023[/B]
[URL]https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/1631023/biden-sends-200-million-in-tax-funds-to-sanctuary-cities-helping-illegal-immigrants/[/URL]
[QUOTE]The Biden administration will shell out $363 million to help cities, states, and nonprofit groups cover the costs of feeding, sheltering, and transporting illegal immigrants released into the United States.[/QUOTE]
-
Oh by the way
[QUOTE]Originally Posted by [b]Elvis2008[/b]
........
And now the latest Fauci video: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-OqyUtDar4[/URL].
The way it works Tooms is guys like Fauci are supposed to be advising Trump. What you had was a guy like Fauci who created the pandemic lying his ass off about it to everyone including Trump.
Seeing as how your goal in life is the USA as China and one party rule, everything good is due to Democrats and everything bad is due to Republicans even when those doing good or bad are often supposed to be apolitical.
I have to wonder though when you make completely stupid comments like the USA is not at war with anyone, I hope you are getting paid and are really not that stupid. I doubt it, but that is my hope.[/QUOTE]Your latest extremely tightly edited video supposedly refuting Fauci's denial that he "strongly fought in favor of" Trump's Pandemic virus having originated naturally from animal to human instead of in a lab leak, a mad scientist's plan to rule the world or popped out of a magic lantern only has him saying one time anything like "he" is leaning strongly in that direction. That is in the first part of the clip. And even his statement in that part could easily have been him saying what it is rather obvious he was saying in every other example in that clip but the con men trying to convince suckers of their spin on it edited it out; that what Fauci was actually saying in virtually every case was that THE EVIDENCE or LACK of evidence to suggest otherwise "strongly leans" in favor of the origin being the same way roughly 75% of these kinds of viruses originating. Namely, in nature from animal to human and even more than that percentage if you factor in an infection of the lab techs while a virus originating that way is being studied.
Look at that clip and those statements again. It is quite clear the editors of that video worked very, very hard to keep the "strongly" words in there while cutting off what he said was "strong" about it. And that was all available evidence that it came about the usual way and no evidence that it came about any other nefarious way.
Now, would you like know why nobody might ever figure out which way Trump's Pandemic virus originated?
See, that's actually the only truly important thing to discover considering there is no EVIDENCE that "strongly supports" it originated any unusual way.
It turns out the BIG reason we might never find out is stated right here:
[B]Do COVIDs Origins Matter?
We should work to minimize lab leaks and spillover risks, regardless of what started the pandemic.
March 29, 2023[/B]
[URL]https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2023/do-covids-origins-matter[/URL]
[QUOTE]The problem is that we have lots of missing data from the earliest days of the pandemic. We dont have good epidemiologic data. We dont have good hospital data.[b] We didnt have access to the laboratories where people were working on coronaviruses. Some of the data has been withheld; some has been destroyed. [/b]And that absence or paucity of data has led to lots of uncertainty. So, each time a new fact emerges, theres a lot of attention placed on that fact or that new piece of data. [/QUOTE]Gee, if ONLY we had stationed some responsible agents from, say, the CDC there whose job it was to do exactly those functions cited above.
Now, let's all put on our Thinking Caps and see if we can figure out why oh why DIDN'T we have CDC agents stationed in those labs all during the initial Trump's Pandemic virus outbreaks so we would have had the access we needed before the Chinese had a chance to lie for weeks or months about the emerging cases and destroy the data.
Well, I certainly know where the EVIDENCE "strongly leans" in favor of why that critical presence of monitors and responders didn't happen and who was responsible for it NOT happening.
And it hasn't got one damn thing to do with Anthony Fauci.
-
Hey, everybody! Remember Trump's USA-Syria War of 2017?
You don't remember the USA-Syria War that Warmonger Donald Trump plunged America into right out of the gate after being appointed so-called president by the Electoral College in 2016?
Well, it was in all the Real News outlets.
[B]Trump Orders Missile Attack in Retaliation for Syrian Chemical Strikes.
April 6, 2017[/B]
[URL]https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/article/1144601/trump-orders-missile-attack-in-retaliation-for-syrian-chemical-strikes/[/URL]
Yep, according to at least one Winger here and apparently a gaggle of Wingers elsewhere, Trump keeping us actively engaged in the War in Afghanistan for every minute of every hour of every day of his so-called presidency from Noon on January 20,2017 until Noon on January 20,2021 wasn't enough warmongering to satisfy him. He had to go ahead and plunge America into ANOTHER War less than three months after lying about the Oath of Office!
Oh, and let's not forget that OTHER War he decided to wage AGAINST the USA on January 6, 2021. You know, the one that he is so unashamedly admitting to being a War he waged against America that he actually refers to his incarcerated Anti-America Insurrectionist Troops as "hostages" of his War Against America.
-
Scumbag Joe sucking more tiny CCP cock again
"Many and perhaps most factory workers who produce gas powered automobiles have a vested interest in keeping America smoking Russian and Arab pole far into the future, as Trump would have us do. However, that isn't necessarily true of other unions.
The ones who do choose to smoke Russian and Arab pole for next week's paycheck, the Trump voters, are also missing the fact that Dem leaders like Joe Biden will make the necessary transition to EVs as painless and smooth as possible. It isn't like a Dem is going to produce a Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction in one of the Repubs' patented "Once in 100 Years Disasters" or Great Repub Depression where a whole bunch of paychecks for a whole bunch of Americans go missing for a whole bunch of times.
Damn, Biden has already produced so many jobs and therefore job opportunities with higher wages that even with plenty of new workers entering the country there is still almost 2 jobs available for every applicant in the market for a job. Disgruntled UAW members included. ".
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/21/strange-tale-about-why-bill-clinton-said-nafta-would-create-million-jobs/[/URL]".
[URL]https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/brown-to-oppose-administrations-deputy-us-trade-representative-nominee[/URL]
Throw in Bloomturd Zuckerturd and Soros little cocks with Hunter and you have a good old time, Scumbag Joe style!
Look at this, Scumbag Joe and the DNC still want TPP, what a surprise.
He needs the oligarchs to push thru another fraudulent win in Nov.
So they must be telling him to work on this ASAP.
-
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889472]
Now, let's all put on our Thinking Caps and see if we can figure out why oh why DIDN'T we have CDC agents stationed in those labs all during the initial Trump's Pandemic virus outbreaks so we would have had the access we needed before the Chinese had a chance to lie for weeks or months about the emerging cases and destroy the data.
Well, I certainly know where the EVIDENCE "strongly leans" in favor of why that critical presence of monitors and responders didn't happen and who was responsible for it NOT happening.
And it hasn't got one damn thing to do with Anthony Fauci.[/QUOTE]Nah, Trumps' removal of all American employees from the Global Health Protection Program in China -- the ones who were SPECIFICALLY TRAINED "to quickly find and stop disease outbreaks" -- had nothing to do with the catastrophic spread of Covid worldwide.
It was all Fauci. And Biden. And Obama, I guess. And other libs.
'Cause they hate America, don't ya know.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889472]Look at that clip and those statements again. It is quite clear the editors of that video worked very, very hard to keep the "strongly" words in there while cutting off what he said was "strong" about it.[/QUOTE]Do you mean look it again after dropping acid or banging my head? The video is Fauci lying for the umpteenth time. He was strongly in favor of Covid being natural in origin and then later lied and said he was not. It is not that hard. He said he was not in favor of the public wearing masks, then he recommended wearing one mask and then two. He lied and said he was not in favor of shutting schools down because of Covid after advocating for closing them. He lied and said if you got vaccinated you could not get Covid. Fauci lying his ass off is nothing new, and you Democratic douches making excuses about his lying is nothing new either.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889472]And even his statement in that part could easily have been him saying what it is rather obvious he was saying in every other example in that clip but the con men trying to convince suckers of their spin on it edited it out; that what Fauci was actually saying in virtually every case[/QUOTE]An yes, the Democratic douche version of disinformation comes out. You are going to explain to us how Fauci is not lying when his own words show he is. How dare these "con men" show Fauci speaking? Thank God, we have douches like you to explain what he actually meant versus just listening to what he said.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889472]We should work to minimize lab leaks and spillover risks, regardless of what started the pandemic.[/QUOTE]If the pandemic started in nature, what good are stopping lab leaks? Your hero Obama told Fauci to quit fucking around with deadly viruses, and he skirted around the order Obama gave him. If you quit fucking around with deadly viruses, you don't need to worry about lab leaks.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889472]Gee, if ONLY we had stationed some responsible agents from, say, the CDC there whose job it was to do exactly those functions cited above.[/QUOTE]How is fucking around with viruses and making them even more deadly "responsible"? And we have this POS Fauci lying about the origins of the virus so people do not understand that he funded the creation of it. He did so even after Obama told him not to out of concern for the public, and your response is we need more "responsible" scientists like Fauci and even more people trying to make deadlier viruses?
I apologize for asking if you were getting paid off or really were that stupid. I didn't consider that you were high. What drugs are you taking now to get so detached from reality? They must be fun.
-
No, you're too gullible
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2889679]Do you mean look it again after dropping acid or banging my head? The video is Fauci lying for the umpteenth time. He was strongly in favor of Covid being natural in origin and then later lied and said he was not. It is not that hard. He said he was not in favor of the public wearing masks, then he recommended wearing one mask and then two. He lied and said he was not in favor of shutting schools down because of Covid after advocating for closing them. He lied and said if you got vaccinated you could not get Covid. Fauci lying his ass off is nothing new, and you Democratic douches making excuses about his lying is nothing new either.
An yes, the Democratic douche version of disinformation comes out. You are going to explain to us how Fauci is not lying when his own words show he is. How dare these "con men" show Fauci speaking? Thank God, we have douches like you to explain what he actually meant versus just listening to what he said.
If the pandemic started in nature, what good are stopping lab leaks? Your hero Obama told Fauci to quit fucking around with deadly viruses, and he skirted around the order Obama gave him. If you quit fucking around with deadly viruses, you don't need to worry about lab leaks..[/QUOTE]If Fauci was repeatedly stating that "[B]I AM[/B] strongly in favor of the natural origin of the Trump's Pandemic virus", they would have backed up those clips to where you clearly hear him saying those exact words up front.
But they didn't.
And that is very, very likely because he was actually referring to "the evidence" strongly favoring that conclusion and the lack of evidence supporting anything else. But the con men who suckered you could not leave those words or anything like them in the clip and sucker you into believing their nonsense.
You got suckered by them. Sorry to break it to you.
-
Ah, found it. Here it is. Fauci said the words Strongly Suggesting! LOL
Uh. I believe this was where the con men who suckered some gullible rubes into believing that Dr. Anthony Fauci repeatedly asserted that he "strongly favored" the natural occurance theory for the origin of the Trump's Pandemic virus and even fought for it.
This was where they lifted and tightly edited the second "example" of him supposedly asserting such a thing in their blatantly obviously misleading video. And repeated it again elsewhere in it.
Watch the whole video. It is only a bit over 9 minutes long. It represents exactly the same stance I have ever heard Fauci take on the continued research that ought to be done in order to learn more about the likely or probable origin of the Trump's Pandemic virus.
But if you just want to get all riled up and do cartwheels over his use of the words "Strongly Suggested" as lied about and twisted out of context by the liars who produced that video con job seen earlier, go to the 6:40 mark and you will discover that the unedited and in context version of his statement is that he is simply referring to the results, the data, the evidence gathered by a team of evolution virologists and epidemiologists as published in Science Magazine "strongly suggesting" a natural occurance origin.
And, as he has probably done dozens of times in dozens of interviews about it, he immediately qualifies that their "strongly suggested" conclusions ARE NOT ENOUGH to settle the issue and we must always keep an open mind about these things.
But the poor suckers who fell for that other tightly edited con job never heard his lead up or the follow up statements in context. Although, I thought it was blatantly obvious in a first viewing that a twisted, lying editing job had been done on it.
[URL]https://youtu.be/emPQMmh18Hk?si=rm21euT4Xd95rbvU[/URL]
-
Scumbag Joe is an existential threat to the present and the future safety of America
But ET doesn't care of course hes hiding behind a miiitary junta 10000 miles away.
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/irans-test-of-biden-is-an-existential-threat-to-his-presidency/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-most-dangerous-world-in-decades/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/bidens-iran-crisis-overlaps-with-his-border-crisis/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=hero&utm_content=related&utm_term=second[/URL]
His weakness encourages aggression.
Kyiv.
Oct 7.
The southern border.
What next? Has this all this been a setup so he can let Xi take Taipei?
He couldn't manage a Jack in The Box in his "prime".
He needs to be put in a nursing home somewhere already.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889752]If Fauci was repeatedly stating that "[B]I AM[/B] strongly in favor of the natural origin of the Trump's Pandemic virus", they would have backed up those clips to where you clearly hear him saying those exact words up front.[/QUOTE]Yeah, if only we had another source other then the video. Oh wait, we can read Fauci's own fucking emails where he says the same thing.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889752]And that is very, very likely because he was actually referring to "the evidence" strongly favoring that conclusion and the lack of evidence supporting anything else.[/QUOTE]This is dumb as saying we are not at war after three American soldiers just got killed.
[URL]https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038[/URL]
And this conclusion, grounded in nothing but two inconclusive speculations, convinced the world's press that SARS2 could not have escaped from a lab.
Natural emergence was the media's preferred theory until around February 2021 and the visit by a World Health Organization commission to China. What became clear was that the Chinese had no evidence to offer the commission in support of the natural emergence theory. This was surprising because both the SARS1 and MERS viruses had left copious traces in the environment. The intermediary host species of SARS1 was identified within four months of the epidemic's outbreak, and the host of MERS within nine months. Yet some 15 months after the SARS2 pandemic began, and a presumably intensive search, Chinese researchers had failed to find either the original bat population, or the intermediate species to which SARS2 might have jumped. Natural emergence remained a conjecture which, however plausible to begin with, had gained not a shred of supporting evidence in over a year.
End of link. So to be clear, there was not one shred of evidence Covid originated in nature. Not now. Not then. None. Zilch. Zero. Nada.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889472]
Gee, if ONLY we had stationed some responsible agents from, say, the CDC there whose job it was to do exactly those functions cited above..[/QUOTE]Ah yes, the CDC.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/former-nyt-editor-slams-fauci-for-discrediting-lab-leak/[/URL]
I think the most upsetting thing to me was The Baltimore Sun calling me a racist because I said this came from a Wuhan lab. ".
Those words came out of the mouth of Dr. Robert Redfield, the former head of the USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/former-nyt-editor-slams-fauci-for-discrediting-lab-leak/[/URL]
Ex-CDC chief: Fauci 'sidelined' me from COVID debate for backing lab leak theory.
"This was an a priori decision that there's one point of view that we're going to put out there, and anyone who doesn't agree with it is going to be sidelined," Redfield said at a hearing of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. "And as I say, I was only the CDC director, and I was sidelined. ".
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889752]You got suckered by them. Sorry to break it to you.[/QUOTE]Not sure who the them is.
You said Trump sidelined the CDC, and the head of the CDC said Fauci sidelined them. Ah, what does the head of the CDC know about the CDC anyway?
And then there is the crux of the debate. Obama banning gain of function research out of fear it would cause a pandemic, and Fauci thinking we must study gain of function so we can one step ahead of a virus if it mutates in nature?
I think it is pretty clear Obama was right, but with you Tooms, Trump was wrong, and he was not even a part of the question. This is classic Trump derangement syndrome. The only thing left to discuss is what is the origin of your TDS is: drugs, money, or stupidity. In your case, Tooms, I am going to go with drugs. I am actually jealous of your taking a drug that so distorts reality.
The Democratic douche answer to everything: is it all Trump's fault. The question that is being asked is irrelevant.
-
That is inarguable evidence of pro Repub Mainstream Media
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2889665]Nah, Trumps' removal of all American employees from the Global Health Protection Program in China -- the ones who were SPECIFICALLY TRAINED "to quickly find and stop disease outbreaks" -- had nothing to do with the catastrophic spread of Covid worldwide.
It was all Fauci. And Biden. And Obama, I guess. And other libs.
'Cause they hate America, don't ya know.[/QUOTE]Mainstream Media knows Trump defunded and removed those agents, the last one in authority being removed by him just 5 months before the first Covid cases emerged in those labs. Or were brought there by an infected local. Or popped out of a Chinese Aladdin's Lamp. However they got there is, of course, an interesting but largely irrelevant point to how and why Trump's Pandemic was produced. Which is why Wingers / Repubs want the former to be focused on as some big deal issue rather than the latter.
Mainstream Media also knows very well that Trump whined and cried and wondered aloud that "China should have told us about those cases. Why didn't they tell us? If only they had told us 2 months earlier we could have avoided all this trouble"!
So when Mainstream Media has now spent 4 years through two critical election cycles not even bothering to connect those 2 GIGANTIC DOTS often enough to make certain that everyone on the planet understands Trump's Economic and National Security Policies = Trump's Pandemic, Trump's Mass Murders, Trump's Worldwide Economic and Supply-Chain Collapse, Trump's Inflation, Trump's Massive Jobs Destruction, etc, then that is inarguable evidence that Mainstream Media goes to extraordinary efforts to "Bothside" help Repubs win elections many, many times more than anything they ever do for Dems.
-
Repubs...No stinkin dictionaries needed...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889456][b]Yes, sigh, indeed[/b]
That is not a war. That is a retaliation. Trump did the same thing. So are you now arguing that Trump "fought TWO or THREE wars at once"?
Please look up a few definitions of "war. " ... [/QUOTE] That's a good one! You're asking, "a MAGA Republican", to actually KNOW (or look up) THE MEANING of words, in a world where [b]they ban dictionaries[/b]? (...kkkk!)
Why would Repubs need dictionaries, when they have the [i]"book of Trump"?[/i] (...kkkk!)
-
Biden's resilient US Economy...is BOOMING!
Biden's US Economy grew at a STAGGERING PACE in Q4 of 2023
Heather Long (Wash. Post, Jan 25th, 2024), who has long claimed the "vibe-cession" is over, explains, why was 2023 such [b]a boom year[/b] for the US Economy?
[LIST]1) Americans kept spending
2) Gov't spending picked up (esp. state and local)
3) A boom in structure" building (e.g. factories)
[b]#1[/b] was driven by strong job growth and wealth growth
[b]#2[/b] and [b]#3[/b] were [b]Biden policy[/b] growth[/LIST]So there it is AGAIN...that resilient Biden economy!
BTW, an economy, growing at [b]"a shocking/staggering pace"[/b], much to the chagrin of Repubs, FOXY MUSE, MSM, and [u]ISG Repub pseudo economists[/u], as even the Q4 (2023) inflation rate was kept low, at 1.7%, well below the FED forecast of 2.0%.
It should be noted that none of this is just simply [i]"accidental economics"[/i] or [i]"Repub Zombie Economics"[/i]. This is just what good STEWARDSHIP, LEADERSHIP and good GOVERNING look like.
President Biden's administration has taken proactive steps to grow the economy and [b]the economy has BOOMED![/b]
-
Hey, thanks for the link to all those Fauci emails
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2889912]Yeah, if only we had another source other then the video. [B]Oh wait, we can read Fauci's own fucking emails where he says the same thing.[/b]
This is dumb as saying we are not at war after three American soldiers just got killed.
[URL]https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038[/URL]
And this conclusion, grounded in nothing but two inconclusive speculations, convinced the world's press that SARS2 could not have escaped from a lab.
Natural emergence was the media's preferred theory until around February 2021 and the visit by a World Health Organization commission to China. What became clear was that the Chinese had no evidence to offer the commission in support of the natural emergence theory. This was surprising because both the SARS1 and MERS viruses had left copious traces in the environment. The intermediary host species of SARS1 was identified within four months of the epidemic's outbreak, and the host of MERS within nine months. Yet some 15 months after the SARS2 pandemic began, and a presumably intensive search, Chinese researchers had failed to find either the original bat population, or the intermediate species to which SARS2 might have jumped. Natural emergence remained a conjecture which, however plausible to begin with, had gained not a shred of supporting evidence in over a year.
End of link. So to be clear, there was not one shred of evidence Covid originated in nature. Not now. Not then. None. Zilch. Zero. Nada.
Ah yes, the CDC.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/former-nyt-editor-slams-fauci-for-discrediting-lab-leak/[/URL]
I think the most upsetting thing to me was The Baltimore Sun calling me a racist because I said this came from a Wuhan lab. ".
Those words came out of the mouth of Dr. Robert Redfield, the former head of the USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/former-nyt-editor-slams-fauci-for-discrediting-lab-leak/[/URL]
Ex-CDC chief: Fauci 'sidelined' me from COVID debate for backing lab leak theory.
"This was an a priori decision that there's one point of view that we're going to put out there, and anyone who doesn't agree with it is going to be sidelined," Redfield said at a hearing of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. "And as I say, I was only the CDC director, and I was sidelined. ".
Not sure who the them is.
You said Trump sidelined the CDC, and the head of the CDC said Fauci sidelined them. Ah, what does the head of the CDC know about the CDC anyway?
And then there is the crux of the debate. Obama banning gain of function research out of fear it would cause a pandemic, and Fauci thinking we must study gain of function so we can one step ahead of a virus if it mutates in nature?
I think it is pretty clear Obama was right, but with you Tooms, Trump was wrong, and he was not even a part of the question. This is classic Trump derangement syndrome. The only thing left to discuss is what is the origin of your TDS is: drugs, money, or stupidity. In your case, Tooms, I am going to go with drugs. I am actually jealous of your taking a drug that so distorts reality.
The Democratic douche answer to everything: is it all Trump's fault. The question that is being asked is irrelevant.[/QUOTE]Well, that settles it. Boy, do I feel silly.
Now that the con job video you fell for has been totally debunked, it is so good of you to now prove that con job video's lie by providing a link to. Uh. By providing a link to. Hmm. Uh. By providing. Uh.
Oh, never mind.
-
LOL. Numbskull Trump can't stand it
[QUOTE=Spidy;2890015]Biden's US Economy grew at a STAGGERING PACE in Q4 of 2023
Heather Long (Wash. Post, Jan 25th, 2024), who has long claimed the "vibe-cession" is over, explains, why was 2023 such [b]a boom year[/b] for the US Economy?
[LIST]1) Americans kept spending
2) Gov't spending picked up (esp. state and local)
3) A boom in structure" building (e.g. factories)
[b]#1[/b] was driven by strong job growth and wealth growth
[b]#2[/b] and [b]#3[/b] were [b]Biden policy[/b] growth[/LIST]So there it is AGAIN...that resilient Biden economy!
BTW, an economy, growing at [b]"a shocking/staggering pace"[/b], much to the chagrin of Repubs, FOXY MUSE, MSM, and [u]ISG Repub pseudo economists[/u], as even the Q4 (2023) inflation rate was kept low, at 1.7%, well below the FED forecast of 2.0%.
It should be noted that none of this is just simply [i]"accidental economics"[/i] or [i]"Repub Zombie Economics"[/i]. This is just what good STEWARDSHIP, LEADERSHIP and good GOVERNING look like.
President Biden's administration has taken proactive steps to grow the economy and [b]the economy has BOOMED![/b][/QUOTE]Trump is such an Economic Numbskull Repub, he is stumbling and fumbling all over himself trying to take credit for Biden's historic high closing stock market levels after he has been predicting a stock market crash under Biden since 2020.
But he declined to take credit for anything else in this Historic Great Dem / Biden Economy without one iota of understanding that the rising stock market is one of the LEAST important and impressive accomplishments by Biden in this amazingly impressive economy, the best post-Trump's Pandrmic economic recovery on the Planet:
[B]Trump claims credit for record-high stock market under Biden.
1/29/2024[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/4435862-trump-claims-credit-record-stock-market-biden/[/URL]
[QUOTE]The Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 index set record highs over the past week.
I think the economy is horrible, except the stock market is going up, and I think the stock market is going up because Im leading Biden in all of the polls, Trump said during a Fox News town hall event in Iowa on Jan. 10. I think there will be a crash if I dont win.[/QUOTE]Lolol. Even Economic Numbskull Repub Trump presided over a rise in the stock market as long as he and his fellow Economic Numbskull Repubs gave disproportionately high tax cuts to Corporate CEOs so they could buy back their own stocks after losing ground due to crap business practices and mismanagement and not do anything else to improve the economy with them.
But even the $Trillions he added to the deficit to buy that easily predictable outcome could not buy more jobs being created with that idiotic Repub legislation than without it, a Real Annual GDP Growth Rate as high as 3%, meaningfully higher wages, a single Infrastructure Project worth mentioning or apparently enough revenue for him to fund and leave the damn Pandemic Prevention and Response Teams in those damn Chinese coronavirus research labs so they could do their damn job of preventing Trump's Damn Pandemic from destroying the whole damn world's economy and supply-chains and mass damn murder millions of people around the whole damn world!
-
Has Trump EVER mentioned Fauci as the one who removed those agents?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2889912]Yeah, if only we had another source other then the video. Oh wait, we can read Fauci's own fucking emails where he says the same thing.
This is dumb as saying we are not at war after three American soldiers just got killed.
[URL]https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038[/URL]
And this conclusion, grounded in nothing but two inconclusive speculations, convinced the world's press that SARS2 could not have escaped from a lab.
Natural emergence was the media's preferred theory until around February 2021 and the visit by a World Health Organization commission to China. What became clear was that the Chinese had no evidence to offer the commission in support of the natural emergence theory. This was surprising because both the SARS1 and MERS viruses had left copious traces in the environment. The intermediary host species of SARS1 was identified within four months of the epidemic's outbreak, and the host of MERS within nine months. Yet some 15 months after the SARS2 pandemic began, and a presumably intensive search, Chinese researchers had failed to find either the original bat population, or the intermediate species to which SARS2 might have jumped. Natural emergence remained a conjecture which, however plausible to begin with, had gained not a shred of supporting evidence in over a year.
End of link. So to be clear, there was not one shred of evidence Covid originated in nature. Not now. Not then. None. Zilch. Zero. Nada.
Ah yes, the CDC.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/former-nyt-editor-slams-fauci-for-discrediting-lab-leak/[/URL]
I think the most upsetting thing to me was The Baltimore Sun calling me a racist because I said this came from a Wuhan lab. ".
Those words came out of the mouth of Dr. Robert Redfield, the former head of the USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/former-nyt-editor-slams-fauci-for-discrediting-lab-leak/[/URL]
Ex-CDC chief: Fauci 'sidelined' me from COVID debate for backing lab leak theory.
"This was an a priori decision that there's one point of view that we're going to put out there, and anyone who doesn't agree with it is going to be sidelined," Redfield said at a hearing of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. "And as I say, I was only the CDC director, and I was sidelined. ".
Not sure who the them is.
You said Trump sidelined the CDC, and the head of the CDC said Fauci sidelined them. Ah, what does the head of the CDC know about the CDC anyway?
And then there is the crux of the debate. Obama banning gain of function research out of fear it would cause a pandemic, and Fauci thinking we must study gain of function so we can one step ahead of a virus if it mutates in nature?
I think it is pretty clear Obama was right, but with you Tooms, Trump was wrong, and he was not even a part of the question. This is classic Trump derangement syndrome. The only thing left to discuss is what is the origin of your TDS is: drugs, money, or stupidity. In your case, Tooms, I am going to go with drugs. I am actually jealous of your taking a drug that so distorts reality.
The Democratic douche answer to everything: is it all Trump's fault. The question that is being asked is irrelevant.[/QUOTE][B]Exclusive: U.S. slashed CDC staff inside China prior to coronavirus outbreak.
March 26, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN21C3NE/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Over the last two years, the White House has pushed U.S. agencies with a presence in China to de-fund programs there along with the positions to manage them, according to the U.S. official who spoke to Reuters.
The source said Terry Branstad, the U.S. ambassador to China and a former Republican governor of Iowa, tried to remind the White House of the importance of the U.S. presence in China but was told to get with the program by an administration official.
"The White House saw the relationship as one-sided and without benefit to the U.S., the source said.[/QUOTE]In the years since the defunding and removal of those agents has been sitting there unexplained, have you or anyone else heard Trump blame Dr. Fauci for the decision to do that?
And why do you suppose Trump would have made this one exception in not blaming anyone and everyone else for one of his spectacular fuck ups, especially Dr. Fauci?
It was a Trump decision and directive, top to bottom. He doesn't even want to talk about it. And, naturally, pro Repub Mainstream Media is more than delighted to oblige.
-
MAGA Selectivity
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2889912]
Ah yes, the CDC.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/former-nyt-editor-slams-fauci-for-discrediting-lab-leak/[/URL]
I think the most upsetting thing to me was The Baltimore Sun calling me a racist because I said this came from a Wuhan lab. ".
Those words came out of the mouth of Dr. Robert Redfield, the former head of the USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/03/08/former-nyt-editor-slams-fauci-for-discrediting-lab-leak/[/URL]
Ex-CDC chief: Fauci 'sidelined' me from COVID debate for backing lab leak theory.
"This was an a priori decision that there's one point of view that we're going to put out there, and anyone who doesn't agree with it is going to be sidelined," Redfield said at a hearing of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. "And as I say, I was only the CDC director, and I was sidelined. ".[/QUOTE]Well, you seem to be fond of NYP, so I'm a bit surprised you didn't read this article. Sorry for bolding, but you know, you guys and your attentions span-.
[QUOTE]Dr. Anthony Fauci accused former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Robert Redfield of lying in front of Congress when he alleged that he was sidelined by Fauci from internal debates about the origin of COVID-19 for pushing the lab leak theory.
[b]He is totally and unequivocally incorrect in what hes saying, that I excluded him,[/b] Fauci told Fox News host Neil Cavuto on Thursday.
Its really unfortunate that in a public setting, like the hearing, that Dr. Redfield made that absolutely incorrect statement, added President Bidens former chief medical adviser.
Redfield, appointed by former President Donald Trump to lead the CDC in March 2018, told the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Wednesday that in the early days of the pandemic, there was an a priori decision that theres one point of view that were going to put out there, and anyone who doesnt agree with it is going to be sidelined.
Redfield specifically cited a Feb. 1, 2020, conference call that he claimed was convened by Fauci and then-National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins to discuss the origins of COVID-19.
The former CDC director said that not only was he cut out of the call, he didnt even find out about it until June 2021.
I was quite upset, as the CDC director, that I was excluded from those discussions, Redfield said Wednesday, claiming he was frozen out because he had a different point of view.
Fauci argued Thursday that [b]I had nothing to do with who would be on that call.[/b]
That call was organized by a group of evolutionary biologist in order to discuss the possibility that this might actually be a virus that was actually engineered, he said. So I didnt put anybody on the list of that call nor did I take anybody out.
Fauci, who spent 38 years as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases before retiring at the end of last year, added that [b]it would have been OK to have Redfield join the discussion, since by his recollection half the people on the call were of the opinion that it might be a lab leak. So his rationale of why he thought he was excluded is an invalid rationale.[/b][/QUOTE][URL]https://nypost.com/2023/03/09/fauci-ex-cdc-chief-redfields-claim-he-was-sidelined-has-no-basis-in-reality/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2889947]Mainstream Media knows Trump defunded and removed those agents, the last one in authority being removed by him just 5 months before the first Covid cases emerged in those labs. [/QUOTE]I must have missed something. Did these agents have a cure for Covid? It does not matter. The answer is it is Trump's fault.
We have a $200 million program run by Fauci who defied the president and created the pandemic. And what do you douches think we need? More Faucis.
What is wrong with you people?
-
Civil War?
"Yeah, if only we had another source other then the video. Oh wait, we can read Fauci's own fucking emails where he says the same thing.
This is dumb as saying we are not at war after three American soldiers just got killed.
And this conclusion, grounded in nothing but two inconclusive speculations, convinced the world's press that SARS2 could not have escaped from a lab.
Natural emergence was the media's preferred theory until around February 2021 and the visit by a World Health Organization commission to China. What became clear was that the Chinese had no evidence to offer the commission in support of the natural emergence theory. This was surprising because both the SARS1 and MERS viruses had left copious traces in the environment. The intermediary host species of SARS1 was identified within four months of the epidemic's outbreak, and the host of MERS within nine months. Yet some 15 months after the SARS2 pandemic began, and a presumably intensive search, Chinese researchers had failed to find either the original bat population, or the intermediate species to which SARS2 might have jumped. Natural emergence remained a conjecture which, however plausible to begin with, had gained not a shred of supporting evidence in over a year.
End of link. So to be clear, there was not one shred of evidence Covid originated in nature. Not now. Not then. None. Zilch. Zero. Nada.
Ah yes, the CDC.
I think the most upsetting thing to me was The Baltimore Sun calling me a racist because I said this came from a Wuhan lab. ".
Those words came out of the mouth of Dr. Robert Redfield, the former head of the USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Ex-CDC chief: Fauci 'sidelined' me from COVID debate for backing lab leak theory.
"This was an a priori decision that there's one point of view that we're going to put out there, and anyone who doesn't agree with it is going to be sidelined," Redfield said at a hearing of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. "And as I say, I was only the CDC director, and I was sidelined. ".
Not sure who the them is.
You said Trump sidelined the CDC, and the head of the CDC said Fauci sidelined them. Ah, what does the head of the CDC know about the CDC anyway?
And then there is the crux of the debate. Obama banning gain of function research out of fear it would cause a pandemic, and Fauci thinking we must study gain of function so we can one step ahead of a virus if it mutates in nature?
I think it is pretty clear Obama was right, but with you Tooms, Trump was wrong, and he was not even a part of the question. This is classic Trump derangement syndrome. The only thing left to discuss is what is the origin of your TDS is: drugs, money, or stupidity. In your case, Tooms, I am going to go with drugs. I am actually jealous of your taking a drug that so distorts reality.
The Democratic douche answer to everything: is it all Trump's fault. The question that is being asked is irrelevant. ".
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/asia/2024/01/30/pakistan-jails-its-most-popular-politician-imran-khan-for-10-years-9-days-before-election/[/URL]
-
Lie Cheat and Steal, its the creedo of the Democrats
"I must have missed something. Did these agents have a cure for Covid? It does not matter. The answer is it is Trump's fault.
We have a $200 million program run by Fauci who defied the president and created the pandemic. And what do you douches think we need? More Faucis.
What is wrong with you people?
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/worse-than-gay/[/URL]
Just ask Scumbag Joe.
-
"I must have missed something. Did these agents have a cure for Covid? It does not matter. The answer is it is Trump's fault.
We have a $200 million program run by Fauci who defied the president and created the pandemic. And what do you douches think we need? More Faucis.
What is wrong with you people?
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/what-is-biden-waiting-for/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=blog-post&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=top-bar-latest&utm_term=second[/URL]
-
Uh. No.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2890111]I must have missed something. Did these agents have a cure for Covid? It does not matter. The answer is it is Trump's fault.
We have a $200 million program run by Fauci who defied the president and created the pandemic. And what do you douches think we need? More Faucis.
What is wrong with you people?[/QUOTE]The CDC Pandemic Prevention and Response Teams that Trump defunded and removed from those Chinese labs had been stationed there to Prevent or Respond to ("cure", if you like) the development of a Pandemic. Nobody expected them to "cure" the disease that Trump's Pandemic spread around the world.
See, there is a difference between a "virus" or the "disease" one developes from being infected by a virus and a "Pandemic". A big difference. Clearly, the world needs many more Faucis out there to continually educate the ignorant masses on these kind of critical differences no matter how simple and obvious they might seem to, well, the rest of us.
And in the case of Trump's Pandemic it would have been the difference between a likely manageable endemic that could have been recognized, reported as the earliest cases emerged and confined through isolation and quarantine to one region of China. Consequently, the Worldwide Economic Devastation and Millions of Deaths that Trump's economic and national security decisions in 2018, in 2019 and all through 2020 produced could have been averted.
Even Trump admitted on an audio recording that a mere 2 months heads up by those CDC Agents that he defunded and removed from those labs would have been plenty of time to EASILY prevent all the problems produced by his Pandemic:
[B]Bob Woodward Was Stunned By What Trump Told Young Son Barron About Coronavirus.
Oct. 25, 2022[/B]
[URL]https://www.yahoo.com/news/bob-woodward-stunned-trump-told-091902598.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]Talking to Woodward on March 19, 2020, Trump said Barron, then 13, asked what was going on and he answered: I said, it came out of China, Barron. Pure and simple. It came out of China. And it shouldve been stopped. And to be honest with you, Barron, [b]they shouldve let it be known it was a problem two months earlier ... the world wouldnt have a problem. We could have stopped it easily.[/b][/QUOTE]
-
Reality Check. Polls can't tell us what people really think.
Polls can only tell us what the poll respondents want to tell someone else what they think.
Elections tell us what they really think.
Case in point; a majority of poll respondents famously tell pollsters that they think "Republicans handle the economy better than Democrats. " And why not tell people that is what you think? I mean, it is so much easier to repeat the classic Repub bumper sticker summation of their economic policies that sound so wonderful and easy yet have never produced anything but Great Repub Crashes, Massive Jobs Destruction or Skyrocketing Unemployment Rates and NONE of the Historic Boom Times and Historic Jobs Creation of the past 100 years or so.
You know, that Repub "smaller government, lower taxes, cut regulations" bullshit.
By stark contrast, when that very Repub pitch is actually implemented and the predictable result is the Repub Economy Crashing down around our ears, businesses closing and jobs being wiped out by the Millions, no sane American voter concludes that the fix for this horrific outcome is to elect more Repubs. LOL. No, they elect Dems to "handle the economy better" and clean up the repeated Repub Party mess.
Same with the pattern of nearly unprecedented Dem election outperformance vs humiluating Repub election underperformance since 2020. Those election results are telling us what the American electorate really thinks about Joe Biden's Party vs Donald Trump's Party. They might be telling pollsters and anyone else who will listen in this Trumpian World of Victim-hood and Grievance that they don't feel that the economy is working better for them now than it did under even the best of the middling Trump economic times pre Trump's Pandemic. But their voting patterns Strongly Suggest they do.
So, aside from this writer getting that one unavoidable nuance regarding polling wrong, imo, this is still a pretty good overview of at least one element in the current gross disparity between the economy and the polls:
[B]Economists see a 'spectacular' economy. Most voters don't. Can Biden turn that around?
Jan. 30, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://news.yahoo.com/calmes-bidens-got-good-news-110031427.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]With the oft-lying Trump calling the economy so fragile, and wishing for a crash, many in his party will never be convinced the economy is actually in good shape, no matter their own financial comfort. [B](Things were better with Trump in office, a Republican caucus-goer in Iowa told the New York Times, adding, I have been pretty lucky, though.)[/b][/QUOTE]
-
Surely a typo there.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2889873][b]Scumbag Joe is an existential threat to the present and the future safety of America[/b]
But ET doesn't care of course hes hiding behind a miiitary junta 10000 miles away.
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/irans-test-of-biden-is-an-existential-threat-to-his-presidency/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-most-dangerous-world-in-decades/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/bidens-iran-crisis-overlaps-with-his-border-crisis/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=hero&utm_content=related&utm_term=second[/URL]
His weakness encourages aggression.
Kyiv.
Oct 7.
The southern border.
What next? Has this all this been a setup so he can let Xi take Taipei?
He couldn't manage a Jack in The Box in his "prime".
He needs to be put in a nursing home somewhere already.[/QUOTE]I am sure you must have meant to say Taylor Swift is an existential threat to the present and the future safety of America.
Or didn't you get the latest memo?
-
Up is the new Down?
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2889665][b]War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. ... [/b][/QUOTE]
Yep!...Sure is on Earth #2!
Don't forget as previously noted, [b][i]"Up is Down"[/i][/b] and [b][i]"Down is Up"[/i][/b], in QAnon/MAGA Repub world (aka. Earth #2).
(...kkkk!)
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2890184]I am sure you must have meant to say Taylor Swift is an existential threat to the present and the future safety of America.
Or didn't you get the latest memo?[/QUOTE]And she totally must be dealt with, right alongside the journalists who upset their lord and savior.
[URL]https://www.thewrap.com/trump-threatens-journalists-with-prison-rape-supreme-court-leak/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Spidy;2890206]Yep!...Sure is on Earth #2!
Don't forget as previously noted, [b][i]"Up is Down"[/i][/b] and [b][i]"Down is Up"[/i][/b], in QAnon/MAGA Repub world (aka. Earth #2).
(...kkkk!)[/QUOTE]Which is probably more true than we'd think, as MAGA hates Biden's economy boom with a nuclear capability.
[QUOTE]Americans learned this week that economic growth in the final three months of 2023 easily outpaced modest expectations, and GDP growth across the entire year was quite good despite overwhelming chatter a year ago about a looming recession.
Maybe leading GOP officials would make the case that the robust economic recovery is nice, but President Joe Biden doesn't deserve any credit. Perhaps they'd argue that its too soon to applaud good news since there's still plenty of economic work to do. Maybe they'd argue that the United States economy is a massive beast, and its unrealistic to think a White House agenda is uniquely responsible for year-to-year shifts.
But as it turns out, Republicans went with the same approach they use in response to robust job growth: They simply ignored the good news, as if it hadn't happened.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/biden-era-economic-growth-leaves-republicans-literally-speechless-rcna135896[/URL]
-
Thanks so much Scumbag Joe and Xi
"I am sure you must have meant to say Taylor Swift is an existential threat to the present and the future safety of America.
Or didn't you get the latest memo?
[URL]https://www.aol.com/news/oregon-leaders-declare-90-day-142304518.html[/URL]
-
Boogeywoman?
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2890297]And she totally must be dealt with, right alongside the journalists who upset their lord and savior.
[URL]https://www.thewrap.com/trump-threatens-journalists-with-prison-rape-supreme-court-leak/[/URL]
Which is probably more true than we'd think, as MAGA hates Biden's economy boom with a nuclear capability.
[URL]https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/biden-era-economic-growth-leaves-republicans-literally-speechless-rcna135896[/URL][/QUOTE]So let's do a quick run down on these in a where are they now segment:
Hilary Clinton (emails / server) From 2012 until 2020; Investigation by DOJ; Congressional House Hearings; "Lock Her UP! 2016-2020 with DOJ ready to do "something" - (Present day. No indictment; living a retirement life and pops up every now and then for lectures).
Obama (muslim / impeach him for? From 2008 until 2016; (Present Day. Leave presidency in peace; seen reading books to children in school during the winter 2023).
Fauci (Pandemic illegalities; lied to the American people) 2020-2023; Indict him? Take his benefits away; put him in jail - (Present day. Retired from public life).
Hunter Biden / Joe Biden; (Quid Pro Quo / Bribery); 2018 - present; 2021-2022 Multiple Congressional house hearings of "whistle blowers" (each time witnesses either said they never saw / heard anything about business dealings); Hunter is subpoena before committees 2022; 2023 Hunter expressed he would do it publicly (no dice, only in secret per Committee Chairmen) - (Present day. Hunter is indicted by Joe's DOJ for crimes he allegedly committed; still living the life of a civilian).
[URL]https://www.justice.gov/sco-weiss/pr/grand-jury-returns-indictment-charging-robert-hunter-biden-three-felony-tax-offenses[/URL]
Joe Biden 2020-2023 (impeach him for stuffs he "did in 2018? 2021 COVID, 2022 Inflation is going to destroy the economy / country, beginning of 2023 stock markets decline is because of Joe; 2023-24 Border issues) - Congressional Hearings because of "smoking guns" yielding exactly where it began before the hearings, nada; Covid seems to have largely mitigated; End of 2023 inflation is tamed and stock markets are at all time highs; (Presently Border. Bill in Senate with bipartisan supported is told by DJT to reject, and republican congressional members are following orders.).
Taylor Swift. How dare you try to convince young people to VOTE?, and tell them who you'll support? - (Present day. Reaching 26.3 billion downloads globally in 2023; nominated for Grammy; living a charmed life).
Take a look at congress and how they did last year. [URL]https://legiscan.com/US/legislation/2023?sort=desc&order=Status[/URL].
Please let me know if you see anything that passed that was meaningful, because I may have overlooked it / them.
-
Trump Hailed as 'Destroyer of America' on Russian State TV
Not that it would disqualify the Orange Jesus in the eyes of his disciples; on the contrary, their adoration for Putin is only trumped by Trump himself (pun intended).
[QUOTE]Russian state media called out former President Donald Trump on Wednesday, saying that he is looked at as "the destroyer of America" amid discussions of the 2024 presidential election.
While speaking with Russian presenter Vladimir Solovyov about Trump, the pundits played a soundbite of the former president's interview with Fox host Sean Hannity. Trump can be heard saying, "Ukraine is being obliterated." The clip of the broadcast was shared on Twitter by Julia Davis, founder of the Russian Media Monitor watchdog group.
Soloyov responds, "And it will be destroyed. Who needs it? Who needs Ukraine where they don't respect Russians?"
Andrey Sidorov, deputy dean of world politics at Moscow State University, then responds, "Trump is coming. Think of him as you will, I always saw him and still see him as a destroyer of America." [/QUOTE]Solovov says: "this is a good thing. ".
[B]"Of course," Sidorov responds, "We need people like that."[/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/trump-hailed-destroyer-america-russian-state-tv-1791560[/URL]
[URL]https://t.co/2BpN51i1VJ[/URL]
-
Your lord and savior loves that. He and his Party work hard to achieve it.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2890324]"I am sure you must have meant to say Taylor Swift is an existential threat to the present and the future safety of America.
Or didn't you get the latest memo?
[URL]https://www.aol.com/news/oregon-leaders-declare-90-day-142304518.html[/URL][/QUOTE][B]Why Trump fears a Biden-GOP immigration deal.
He doesn't want us to solve the border problem because he wants to blame Biden for it.[/B]
[URL]https://www.vox.com/politics/2024/1/25/24050278/senate-immigration-border-ukraine-trump-mcconnell-romney[/URL]
Nobody wants Open Borders, spreading Fentanyl addiction, a crashing economy, jobs wiped out by the millions and worldwide authoritarian dictatorships to prevail more than Donald Trump and the Republican Party.
Every move they make 24/7 is devoted to producing those results.
-
The Chiip Roy dilemma...what do Republicans campaign on?
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2890349][b]Boogeywoman? [/b]
So let's do a quick run down on these in a where are they now segment:
Hilary Clinton (emails / server) From 2012 until 2020; ...
Obama (muslim / impeach him for? From 2008 until 2016; ...
Hunter Biden / Joe Biden; (Quid Pro Quo / Bribery); ...
Joe Biden 2020-2023 (impeach him for stuffs he "did in 2018? 2021 COVID, 2022 Inflation is going to destroy the economy / country, beginning of 2023 stock markets decline is because of Joe;
...
Taylor Swift. How dare you try to convince young people to VOTE? ...
[b]Please let me know if you see anything that passed that was meaningful, because I may have overlooked it / them.[/b] [/QUOTE]Nicely put!
The only thing I would add, is the context of "meaningful". Oh I'm sure those so called "issues" were [B][i]"meaningful"[/i][/B] to QAnon / MAGA Repubs and Trump cultists, but not so much for the rest of white and blue collar working Americans.
Needless to say, you're not the only one WAITING for that very answer. As EihTooms, was in an earlier post, also pondering that very same question:
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2872383][b]I assume Repub Chip Roy is still waiting for a convincing reply to his question.[/b]
[QUOTE=Spidy;2871647]Let me put it to you, like Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) on Nov, 13th, 2023, when trying his damndest, to find [u]anything meaningful[/u] his woeful Republican party had done:
[LIST]Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) - [b]"One thing[/b]...I want my Republican colleagues to give me, one thing...one, that I can go campaign on and said we did?", "One?...anyone sitting in the complex wanna come down to the floor and explain to me, [u]one[/u] material, meaningful and significant thing... the Republican majority have done, [b][u]besides[/u]...well I guess it's not as bad as the Democrats?"[/b]
{...Muffled silent chuckles abound from Democrats and some Republicans...}[/LIST][/QUOTE]
Repub Chip Roy could just have well asked [b]what Repubs have EVER done of significance for America[/b] when they controlled the Presidency, the House and the Senate, not just the Repub Pink Tinkle House over the past few months, and gotten the same utter silence I get here when I ask a similar question of anyone. ... [/QUOTE]But rest assured and true to their hypocritical nature, they've already started, [B][i]"Taking Credit for Stuff they Voted Against"[/i][/B], for the upcoming 2024 election.
-
Trump taking credit...is like claiming SHIT don't sink...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2890042][b]LOL. Numbskull Trump can't stand it [/b]
Trump is such an Economic Numbskull Repub, he is stumbling and fumbling all over himself trying to take credit for Biden's historic high closing stock market levels after he has been predicting a stock market crash under Biden since 2020.
But he declined to take credit for anything else in this Historic Great Dem / Biden Economy without one iota of understanding that the rising stock market is one of the LEAST important and impressive accomplishments by Biden in this amazingly impressive economy, the best post-Trump's Pandrmic economic recovery on the Planet:
Trump claims credit for record-high stock market under Biden.
1/29/2024
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/4435862-trump-claims-credit-record-stock-market-biden/[/URL]
Lolol. Even Economic Numbskull Repub Trump presided over a rise in the stock market as long as he and his fellow Economic Numbskull Repubs gave disproportionately high tax cuts to Corporate CEOs so they could buy back their own stocks after losing ground due to crap business practices and mismanagement and not do anything else to improve the economy with them. ... [/QUOTE]
(...kkkk!) Why am I NOT surprised! After all, this is what Trump has done all his life. Buy a hotel/building, then slap the TRUMP name on it and take credit for having built, constructed and architectural designed the thing.
No need to tell you, this is just what they do! Republicans taking credit for stuff they either voted against, didn't vote for and/or economic and administrative successes they didn't accomplish. They are not a serious party and standup for very little or have accomplished anything meaningful for working Americas.
So now in the same nonsensical spirit of [b][i]"doing nothing"[/b][/i] while in congress, the QAnon/MAGA Repubs and right-wing trolls start a culture war with Taylor Swift.
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2890349][b]Boogeywoman? [/b] ... Taylor Swift. How dare you try to convince young people to VOTE? ... [/QUOTE]
Personally, my money is on Taylor Swift, as she has probably done more for the American economy in 2023, than the Republicans have in the last 8 years.
I think Repubs and [b]right-wing trolls[/b] should stick to their "knitting". That being more along the lines of attacking fictional characters or fictional [i]"purple people"[/i]. You know the ones, the kind that [i]"can't fight back[/i], [i]talk-back[/i] or [i]hit back"[/i]. Like their purple culture wars, they started, when they went after, [b]Barney the big purple dinosaur[/b] and [b]the purple Teletubbie baby.[/b] (...kkkk!)
Boogeywoman...indeed!
-
The Trump-Repub Border Crisis explained
This sums it up nicely in under 4 minutes:
[URL]https://youtu.be/YB-Rvp1diwc?si=7EHCRIO4HaEsRI3g[/URL]
-
When America FAILS...send in the [Repub] clowns!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2890470]This sums it up nicely in under 4 minutes:
[URL]https://youtu.be/YB-Rvp1diwc?si=7EHCRIO4HaEsRI3g[/URL][/QUOTE] (...kkkk!) Excellent Rant! And at the same time gives a pretty good explanation!
[i]"They [Repubs] WANT things to be bad in this country. When things are BAD for us...it's GOOD for THEM [Repubs] and THEY [Repubs] succeed, when America FAILS!"[/i]
Dude is spot on and calls out the Repubs for the nihilists that they are!
-
Thanks, Joe, Nancy or Nikki, Chuck and the Dems
LOL. I swear I heard some Repub Trumper Numbskull in Michigan open his piehole in front of a reporter's microphone and proudly announce he was going to vote for Trump over Biden because, "I know Trump will do the best thing for the American worker. ".
Oh my God. The dude was so ignorant he apparently has no idea that Trump's classic Repub economic policies and stewardship wiped out Tens of Millions of American Worker Jobs, finally ending his godawful so-called presidency with fewer American Worker Jobs than existed when Obama-Biden handed him better economic conditions than any Repub administration has ever handed an incoming Dem!
Even by this point in Trump's so-called presidency, before his 2018,2019 and 2020 economic and national security policies and stewardship created Trump's Pandemic, his and his idiot Repub Majority in Congress' one and only godawful economic "stimulus" legislation, costing an addition to the defict of $Trillions, had created FEWER American Worker jobs with it than in the three prior years without it!
This is not an election year so much as it is a USA national I. Q. Test with the equivalent of one simple question;.
Does 2+2=4 or does 2+2=1?
If Trump wins the election or rather is appointed by the Electoral College, it is clear too many Americans are so dumb they actually think 2+2=1.
[B]USA Economy added 353,000 jobs in January, much better than expected.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/02/us-economy-added-353000-jobs-in-january-much-better-than-expected.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Job growth posted a surprise increase in January, demonstrating again that the U.S. labor market is solid and poised to support broader economic growth.
Nonfarm payrolls expanded by 353,000 for the month, much better than the Dow Jones estimate for 185,000, the Labor Departments Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday. The unemployment rate held at 3.7%, against the estimate for 3.8%.
Wage growth also showed strength, as average hourly earnings increased 0.6%, double the monthly estimate. On a year-over-year basis, wages jumped 4.5%, well above the 4.1% forecast. The wage gains came amid a decline in average hours worked, down to 34.1, or 0.2 hour lower.
Job growth was widespread on the month, led by professional and business services with 74,000. Other significant contributors included health care (70,000), retail trade (45,000), government (36,000), social assistance (30,000) and manufacturing (23,000).
The report also indicated that Decembers job gains were much better than originally reported. The month posted a gain of 333,000, which was an upwards revision of 117,000 from the initial estimate. November also was revised higher, to 182,000, or 9,000 higher than the last estimate.
While the report demonstrated the resilience of the U.S. economy, it also could raise questions about how soon the Federal Reserve will be able to lower interest rates.
The January payrolls count comes with economists and policymakers closely watching employment figures for direction on the larger economy. Some high-profile layoffs recently have raised questions about the durability of what has been a powerful trend in hiring.
However, broader layoff numbers, such as the Labor Departments report on initial jobless claims, show companies hesitant to part with workers in such a tight labor market.
Gross domestic product growth also has defied expectations.
The fourth quarter saw GDP increase at a strong 3.3% annualized pace, closing out a year in which the economy defied widespread predictions for a recession. Growth came even as the Federal Reserve further raised interest rates in its quest to bring down inflation.
The Atlanta Feds GDPNow tracker is pointing towards a 4.2% gain in the first quarter of 2024, albeit with limited data of where things are heading for the first three months of the year.
The economic, employment and inflation dynamics make for a complicated picture as the Fed seeks to ease monetary policy. Earlier this week, the Fed again held benchmark short-term borrowing costs steady and indicated that rate cuts could be ahead but not until inflation shows further signs of cooling.
Chair Jerome Powell indicated in his post-meeting news conference that the central bank does not have a growth mandate and said central bankers remain concerned about the impact that high inflation is having on consumers, particularly those on the lower end of the income scale.[/QUOTE]
-
No way
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/02/opinion/transgender-children-gender-dysphoria.html[/URL]
-
It's Never Too Late
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2890814][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/02/opinion/transgender-children-gender-dysphoria.html[/URL][/QUOTE]So there is hope for Trumpers and Wingers to realize their tragic mistake and turn their lives around, too.
Good news.
-
Article entitled OPINION
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2890814][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/02/opinion/transgender-children-gender-dysphoria.html[/URL][/QUOTE]Not going to justify or dismiss this article.
I feel for the 1% of the population going through this, the individual, their families, the doctors who have to advise them of options. Why I feel this topic should not be political is that this subset of the population deserves to be able to go through this process privately. What I mean by this is, whether they're going to go to the bathroom, or being on a youth team sports not "designated" for them is inconsequential to US. But for whatever reasons, some of us feel like our chances / freedom is being taken away.
How? Because a straight person like to be in a public bathroom not having to, by chance, look at another human going to the bathroom who don't look like them. We did this already with other differences for many years in the US, South Africa, and Germany, and other countries.
Unlike people who are invested in this subject, to be soooo outraged by the thought of someone who isn't like them is SHARING a public spot, I don't care. I don't remember a single face or body type of anyone I have ever shared a bathroom in public with. I like to do my thing, wash my hands, and get the hell out ASAP. But for those who are hung up, what are you doing in there? Why is your mind wondering?
#2, that we are "protecting" kids from Pedos. Majority of Pedos are straight people, just like all statistically aspects of life, the majority of people are straight therefore majority of all crimes, successes, bankcruptcies, divorces, and achievements are because of them. I'm cool with fixing problems, but don't create issues to scapegoat people who are unlikely to defend themselves.
#3, it creates an unfair advantage for transgenders to compete with a girls in high school. It is also unfair advantage for girls to likely be chosen for cheerleading squads over transgenders. Ask yourself, of these two examples, which will more likely happen?
Raw stats: 1. 4% of pop between 13-17 identify themselves as trans; 34% participates in sports. Total 13-17 in US is about 300,000. This means about 1428 kids who are trans that potentially would participate, which comes to about 28 total per state divided evenly among 50 states (states are not equal in real life). Let's say I'm wrong and you double the number. Your advocating that a state (any) can't accommodate 60 people.
[URL]https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/trans-adults-united-states/[/URL]
To me, the article demonstrates how hard it is go through life "not Normal". Decisions you and I never need to think about or have to make. And then, how some among us go out of our ways to make it even harder on their lives just trying to live a "normal" life. I say this for black people who have to live through segregations, jews through the nazi era, gays throughout history, and now transgenders.
-
Too late.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2890972]So there is hope for Trumpers and Wingers to realize their tragic mistake and turn their lives around, too.
Good news.[/QUOTE]Nah, only children and young adults can change. For wingers the damage has been done.
-
Not normal aka crazy as fuck LMAO
"Not going to justify or dismiss this article.
I feel for the 1% of the population going through this, the individual, their families, the doctors who have to advise them of options. Why I feel this topic should not be political is that this subset of the population deserves to be able to go through this process privately. What I mean by this is, whether they're going to go to the bathroom, or being on a youth team sports not "designated" for them is inconsequential to US. But for whatever reasons, some of us feel like our chances / freedom is being taken away.
How? Because a straight person like to be in a public bathroom not having to, by chance, look at another human going to the bathroom who don't look like them. We did this already with other differences for many years in the US, South Africa, and Germany, and other countries.
Unlike people who are invested in this subject, to be soooo outraged by the thought of someone who isn't like them is SHARING a public spot, I don't care. I don't remember a single face or body type of anyone I have ever shared a bathroom in public with. I like to do my thing, wash my hands, and get the hell out ASAP. But for those who are hung up, what are you doing in there? Why is your mind wondering?
#2, that we are "protecting" kids from Pedos. Majority of Pedos are straight people, just like all statistically aspects of life, the majority of people are straight therefore majority of all crimes, successes, bankcruptcies, divorces, and achievements are because of them. I'm cool with fixing problems, but don't create issues to scapegoat people who are unlikely to defend themselves.
#3, it creates an unfair advantage for transgenders to compete with a girls in high school. It is also unfair advantage for girls to likely be chosen for cheerleading squads over transgenders. Ask yourself, of these two examples, which will more likely happen?
Raw stats: 1. 4% of pop between 13-17 identify themselves as trans; 34% participates in sports. Total 13-17 in US is about 300,000. This means about 1428 kids who are trans that potentially would participate, which comes to about 28 total per state divided evenly among 50 states (states are not equal in real life). Let's say I'm wrong and you double the number. Your advocating that a state (any) can't accommodate 60 people.
[URL]https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/trans-adults-united-states/[/URL]
To me, the article demonstrates how hard it is go through life "not Normal". Decisions you and I never need to think about or have to make. And then, how some among us go out of our ways to make it even harder on their lives just trying to live a "normal" life. I say this for black people who have to live through segregations, jews through the nazi era, gays throughout history, and now transgenders."
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2891000]Not going to justify or dismiss this article.
I feel for the 1% of the population going through this, the individual, their families, the doctors who have to advise them of options. Why I feel this topic should not be political is that this subset of the population deserves to be able to go through this process privately. What I mean by this is, whether they're going to go to the bathroom, or being on a youth team sports not "designated" for them is inconsequential to US. But for whatever reasons, some of us feel like our chances / freedom is being taken away.
How? Because a straight person like to be in a public bathroom not having to, by chance, look at another human going to the bathroom who don't look like them. We did this already with other differences for many years in the US, South Africa, and Germany, and other countries.
Unlike people who are invested in this subject, to be soooo outraged by the thought of someone who isn't like them is SHARING a public spot, I don't care. I don't remember a single face or body type of anyone I have ever shared a bathroom in public with. I like to do my thing, wash my hands, and get the hell out ASAP. But for those who are hung up, what are you doing in there? Why is your mind wondering?[/QUOTE]I think, the gist of "bathroom" concern is about kids or would've been if a certain group of politicians hadn't put it on their banner. Grownups can handle sharing a bathroom, which is evidenced by the ease Americans get used to unisex restrooms in France, not even mentioning all kinds of public joint "setups" in Thailand, Japan, Cambodia and other countries. Hell, Paris has street urinals now with pretty much no cover at all.
For schools, on the other hand, it's tricky. I understand parents who want school restrooms segregated. I would've felt the same way.
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2891000]#3, it creates an unfair advantage for transgenders to compete with a girls in high school. It is also unfair advantage for girls to likely be chosen for cheerleading squads over transgenders. Ask yourself, of these two examples, which will more likely happen?
Raw stats: 1. 4% of pop between 13-17 identify themselves as trans; 34% participates in sports. Total 13-17 in US is about 300,000. This means about 1428 kids who are trans that potentially would participate, which comes to about 28 total per state divided evenly among 50 states (states are not equal in real life). Let's say I'm wrong and you double the number. Your advocating that a state (any) can't accommodate 60 people.
[URL]https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/trans-adults-united-states/[/URL][/QUOTE]Just to be clear, I'm not against transgenders (when transitions are truly justified), but imagine that you have to compete with someone who's a priori faster and stronger than you are. How can you accommodate trans (even if there are very few of them) that wouldn't hurt competing female athletes who don't naturally possess these abilities? Is it even possible at all?
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2891000]To me, the article demonstrates how hard it is go through life "not Normal". Decisions you and I never need to think about or have to make. And then, how some among us go out of our ways to make it even harder on their lives just trying to live a "normal" life. I say this for black people who have to live through segregations, jews through the nazi era, gays throughout history, and now transgenders.[/QUOTE]It's very hard to be different, no questions about that. And kids especially can be cruel beyond belief.
-
What no Jew hating HAKEEM you typically RACIST leftard LMAO
"LOL. I swear I heard some Repub Trumper Numbskull in Michigan open his piehole in front of a reporter's microphone and proudly announce he was going to vote for Trump over Biden because, "I know Trump will do the best thing for the American worker. ".
Oh my God. The dude was so ignorant he apparently has no idea that Trump's classic Repub economic policies and stewardship wiped out Tens of Millions of American Worker Jobs, finally ending his godawful so-called presidency with fewer American Worker Jobs than existed when Obama-Biden handed him better economic conditions than any Repub administration has ever handed an incoming Dem!
Even by this point in Trump's so-called presidency, before his 2018,2019 and 2020 economic and national security policies and stewardship created Trump's Pandemic, his and his idiot Repub Majority in Congress' one and only godawful economic "stimulus" legislation, costing an addition to the defict of $Trillions, had created FEWER American Worker jobs with it than in the three prior years without it!
This is not an election year so much as it is a USA national I. Q. Test with the equivalent of one simple question;.
Does 2+2=4 or does 2+2=1?
If Trump wins the election or rather is appointed by the Electoral College, it is clear too many Americans are so dumb they actually think 2+2=1. ".
With enemies this stoopid, nobody needs friends LMAO.
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/02/e-jean-carrolls-self-defeating-media-tour/[/URL]
-
Uh
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2891166][b]What no Jew hating HAKEEM you typically RACIST leftard LMAO[/b] "LOL. I swear I heard some Repub Trumper Numbskull in Michigan open his piehole in front of a reporter's microphone and proudly announce he was going to vote for Trump over Biden because, "I know Trump will do the best thing for the American worker. ".
Oh my God. The dude was so ignorant he apparently has no idea that Trump's classic Repub economic policies and stewardship wiped out Tens of Millions of American Worker Jobs, finally ending his godawful so-called presidency with fewer American Worker Jobs than existed when Obama-Biden handed him better economic conditions than any Repub administration has ever handed an incoming Dem!
Even by this point in Trump's so-called presidency, before his 2018,2019 and 2020 economic and national security policies and stewardship created Trump's Pandemic, his and his idiot Repub Majority in Congress' one and only godawful economic "stimulus" legislation, costing an addition to the defict of $Trillions, had created FEWER American Worker jobs with it than in the three prior years without it!
This is not an election year so much as it is a USA national I. Q. Test with the equivalent of one simple question;.
Does 2+2=4 or does 2+2=1?
If Trump wins the election or rather is appointed by the Electoral College, it is clear too many Americans are so dumb they actually think 2+2=1. ".
With enemies this stoopid, nobody needs friends LMAO.
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/02/e-jean-carrolls-self-defeating-media-tour/[/URL][/QUOTE]Hakeem Jeffries would be among "the Dems" that I cited deserving credit and thanks for pulling us out of another Repub Once In 100 Years Disaster and Massive Jobs Destruction and into another Great Dem Economic Recovery, Expansion and Jobs Creation.
See, he only became the Dem Leader in the House on January 3, 2023, after Nancy or was it Nikki stepped down from that position and after virtually all of the heavy lifting and political risk taking to achieve that historic positive result had been shouldered and assumed by the Dems whose leadership I mentioned by name.
Since then, the new Repub "leadership" has, predictably, been only about inflicting economy-damaging brinkmanship threats to shut down the government, not pay the bills they racked up like the deadbeat Repubs they are, take innumerable votes just to choose a "leader", kick out that "leader" it took them innumerable votes to choose, pick a ChristoFacist "leader" to replace that one, linger and drool over nude photos of someone who never ran for or held elected office and do endless but as yet fruitless research on what the hell they can pitch for a reason to Impeach President Hunter Biden.
Consequently, all of the most meaningful gains for the American people related to the House of Representatives came to a screeching halt the moment the Repub Getting Smaller and Smaller All The Time Pink Tinkle House Majority took over.
And, therefore, Hakeem was only able to participate as a rank and file Dem in cleaning up the colossal mess and historically putrid "fumes" left behind from one of if not THE worst economic and national security results produced by Trump before he became Leader of the Dems in the House.
Yeah, regarding your link, it appears that $83 Millon + $5 Milloon + Daily Interest on those Millions might finally be enough to keep the name of Trump's sexual assault victim, the court clerk, the judge, the judge's family etc out of his piehole for a while. Since that judgement was handed down Trump has dutifully and obediently not uttered in public or written their names in vain as he simply could not prevent himself from doing previously.
-
Trump's Tax Hikes on everyone and Hyper-Inflation plans, Part 2
Being a classic Repub, America's economy doing historically well today while China's economy is crap really, really bothers Trump.
Therefore, he is already floating his plan to "turn this economy around" in classic Repub fashion should just enough of the American electorate prove themselves incapable of choosing the correct answer for what 2+2 equals and put him back into the White House:
[B]Trump floats 'more than' 60% tariffs on Chinese imports.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/04/trump-floats-more-than-60percent-tariffs-on-chinese-imports.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Trump confirmed that he would impose tariffs of 60% or higher on Chinese goods were he to win a second term in office.
His tariff strategy could revive the trade war he triggered during his first term as president when he imposed $250 billion in China tariffs.
Trumps China trade war disrupted the global economy, raised consumer costs, stirred stock markets and put U.S.-China relations on ice.
.....
"What Donald Trumps about to do, is hes going to raise every households expenses by $2,600 a year, said Haley in a January interview on CNBCs Squawk Box, referencing data from the fiscally conservative National Taxpayers Union.
Her disapproval echoes the concerns of Wall Street investors who worry that another China trade war would disrupt markets again.
Starting in 2018, Trump began a wave of $250 billion in tariffs against China. The country then struck back with its own set of tariffs against the U.S. in a back-and-forth economic battle that lasted years and disrupted global trade dynamics.
Trumps trade war with China cost Americans an estimated $195 billion since 2018, according to the American Action Forum, a conservative think tank. The economic battle also led to the loss of more than 245,000 U.S. jobs, according to the U.S.-China Business Council.
At the time, Deutsche Bank estimated that the trade war was causing the stock market to hemorrhage trillions.
The tariff dispute also left the U.S. and China, once each others biggest trading partners, on rocky geopolitical terms. President Joe Biden has been trying to warm the icy relations throughout his administration.
Trump has attacked Biden for appeasing China while simultaneously expressing cozy sentiments toward Chinas authoritarian president, Xi Jinping.
I like President Xi a lot, Trump said Sunday. He was a really good friend of mine during my time.
Trump has in the past praised Xi for the ironclad grip he has on his government and his people. In an interview with Fox Newss Sean Hannity in December, Trump said if he is re-elected for a second term he would be a dictator from day one.[/QUOTE]
-
The end is nigh for all you evil mofos
"Being a classic Repub, America's economy doing historically well today while China's economy is crap really, really bothers Trump.
Therefore, he is already floating his plan to "turn this economy around" in classic Repub fashion should just enough of the American electorate prove themselves incapable of choosing the correct answer for what 2+2 equals and put him back into the White House:
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/joe-biden-nbc-2024/2024/02/04/id/1152209/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.wral.com/story/poll-20-point-deficit-on-economy-highlights-biden-s-struggles-vs-trump/21267551/[/URL]
-
The Sheriff is coming
"Being a classic Repub, America's economy doing historically well today while China's economy is crap really, really bothers Trump.
Therefore, he is already floating his plan to "turn this economy around" in classic Repub fashion should just enough of the American electorate prove themselves incapable of choosing the correct answer for what 2+2 equals and put him back into the White House:
Line up all available military and commercial cargo planes, all public and private buses.
All hands on deck.
All trains planes and buses.
Mass raids and deportations are coming REST ASSURED.
Stay tuned.
Jan 2025.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/04/us/politics/trump-fox-interview.html[/URL]
Allahu Akbar.
And thanks Scumbag Joe!!
-
60%? I vote for 160%, and India should be next
"Being a classic Repub, America's economy doing historically well today while China's economy is crap really, really bothers Trump.
Therefore, he is already floating his plan to "turn this economy around" in classic Repub fashion should just enough of the American electorate prove themselves incapable of choosing the correct answer for what 2+2 equals and put him back into the White House:
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/trump-china-tariffs/2024/02/04/id/1152208/[/URL]
-
You Have Been Warned. Vote Accordingly.
[B]Beware Trump's admiration for Putin, Xi and Erdogan.[/B]
[URL]https://www.ft.com/content/28e1e7da-37fb-11ea-a6d3-9a26f8c3cba4[/URL]
[URL]https://news.knowledia.com/GB/en/articles/beware-trump-s-admiration-for-putin-xi-and-erdogan-4f3cc6d59182c0626c04fc4d5c37efe246b56267[/URL]
[B]Turkey's inflation sees biggest monthly jump since August, near 65% year-on-year.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/05/turkey-inflation-sees-biggest-monthly-jump-since-august.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]In January, Turkish inflation logged its biggest monthly jump since August with a 6.7% rise from December, while year-on-year inflation hit nearly 65%.
Food, beverages and tobacco, as well as transportation, all increased between roughly 5% and 7% month-on-month, while housing was up 7.4% since December.
The figures come two days after Turkeys appointment of a new central bank governor, Fatih Karahan.[/QUOTE]Do not doubt for one minute that Donald Wannabe Dictator Trump, ChristoFacist Mike, Moscow Mitch, virtually every Repub in Congress and every Repub voter would dearly LOVE to trade the historically positive USA Economy, Recovery, Expansion, Jobs Creation, Wage Gains and National Security as produced by President Joe Biden and the Dems for the horrific crap Economic and National. Security conditions produced by Trump's Authoritarian Dictator Idols in a nanosecond!
-
Uh
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2891376][b]60%? I vote for 160%, and India should be next[/b]
"Being a classic Repub, America's economy doing historically well today while China's economy is crap really, really bothers Trump.
Therefore, he is already floating his plan to "turn this economy around" in classic Repub fashion should just enough of the American electorate prove themselves incapable of choosing the correct answer for what 2+2 equals and put him back into the White House:
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/trump-china-tariffs/2024/02/04/id/1152208/[/URL][/QUOTE]You do know that it is the American consumer who ultimately pays those Failed Loser Trump Trade War Trump Tariffs, right?
It is not Indians in India or the Chinese in China who ultimately pay those Trump / Repub hyper inflated prices.
[B]Who Really Pays the Tariffs? U.S. Firms and Consumers, Through Higher Prices.
Dec. 15, 2021[/B]
[URL]https://taxfoundation.org/blog/who-really-pays-tariffs/[/URL]
Oh, Tariffs can be imposed without crippling the domestic economy or reducing jobs creation if the accompanying economic legislation and stewardship is sterling, brilliant, highly effective enough to override the damage done by them. Shhh. Don't tell Larry Summers about that. It would crush him.
Biden / the Dems have been able to manage that result.
Trump / the Repubs did not. And never will. It is simply beyond a Repub's grasp to know how to do that and do it.
-
Repubs just don't want to SOLVE REAL PROBLEMS...
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2891000][b]Article entitled OPINION[/b]
Not going to justify or dismiss this article.
I feel for the 1% of the population going through this, the individual, their families, the doctors who have to advise them of options. Why I feel this topic should not be political is that this subset of the population deserves to be able to go through this process privately. What I mean by this is, whether they're going to go to the bathroom, or being on a youth team sports not "designated" for them is inconsequential to US. But for whatever reasons, some of us feel like our chances / freedom is being taken away.
How? Because a straight person like to be in a public bathroom not having to, by chance, look at another human going to the bathroom who don't look like them. We did this already with other differences for many years in the US, South Africa, and Germany, and other countries. [/QUOTE]
Great post! Once again nicely put!
Yes, much of the right-winger agendas, would have Americans pay more attention looking over in the "right corner", while they take away your REAL freedoms and rights (ie. abortion, women's healthcare or affordable healthcare) over from the "left corner" of the political spectrum.
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2891000]Unlike people who are invested in this subject, to be soooo outraged by the thought of someone who isn't like them is SHARING a public spot, I don't care. ...
#2, that we are "protecting" kids from Pedos. ...
#3, it creates an unfair advantage for transgenders to compete with a girls in high school. ...
Raw stats: 1. 4% of pop between 13-17 identify themselves as trans; 34% participates in sports. Total 13-17 in US is about 300,000. ...
[URL]https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/trans-adults-united-states/[/URL]
To me, the article demonstrates how hard it is go through life "not Normal". Decisions you and I never need to think about or have to make. And then, how some among us go out of our ways to make it even harder on their lives just trying to live a "normal" life. I say this for black people who have to live through segregations, jews through the nazi era, gays throughout history, and now transgenders. [/QUOTE]
Right-wing politics have always used "minority" groups of society to inflame and enrage their base and divide the populous along racial, ethnic, cultural and sexual orientation lines. Especially when they can't run on a [i][b]"the economy is bad...vote for us!"[/b][/i] campaign.
Unfortunately it's a much proven divisive tactic, to obfuscate and scapegoat (as you've eloquently mentioned), the REAL problems of society.
Don't forget, it really says something (mostly foul) about a political party (ie. were NOT a REAL party), [b]that negatively focuses more on issues of the 1%[/b], than those of 99% of their populous.
Oh, no instead of addressing REAL ISSUES, they would have Americans heads in the sand, chasing "fool's gold", talking about meaningless culture wars, meaningless fictional purple character's sexual orientation, or as previously mentioned and foretold, the ominous boogeymen/boogeywomen, come to drag us all to hell.
Whether it is:[LIST]- book burning/banning {dictionaries included}
- bathroom hijinx
- the "boogeymen" and "boogeywomen" (ie. like Taylor Swift)
- purple dinosaurs and purple teletubbie babies[/LIST]It's [u]ALL JUST ONE BIG DISTRACTION[/u] to turn and [i]look over in the "right-corner" at less meaningful and ridiculous issues for the majority of Americans.[/i]
The funny (and most hilarious) thing, about what right-wing QAnon/MAGA politics is clearly showing Americans, that even when [b]good, viable bi-partisan bills and policies are put on the table[/b], to address REAL problems...[u]THEY DON'T WANT TO SOLVE REAL PROBLEMS![/u] (Note: Especially if it is the Dems, initiating said bi-partisan legislation. Which is almost always!)
WHY don't Repubs, want to solve real problems...you ask? [LIST]Simple put, [i]"hate", "nihilism", "anarchy", "thuggery", "grifting"[/i] and [i]"do nothing"[/i] politics have become the order of the day for Repubs and Trump.[/LIST][LIST]Simple put, on the one hand, they want to distract Americans (especially they're base) from anything substantive. And while distracted, "pick your pockets" clean, thus benefiting their wealth rich and billionaire donor class.[/LIST]Personally, I'll continue to primarily focus on the bi-partisan good being done to benefit ALL Americas.
-
The Trump / Repub Love For Open Borders and Fenantyl Addiction Knows No Bounds.
Trump, ChristoFacist Mike and the Repub Pink Tinkle House Majority LOVE and PREFER Open Borders and widespread Fenantyl Addiction so much they simply cannot bring themselves to agree to even put up for a vote the Border Crisis Solution Bill that a Ruby Red Repub Senator from a Ruby Red Repub State negotiated and was quite happy about:
[B]Mike Johnson Won't Bring Senate Border Bill Up For A Vote.
Because you know who is pulling his strings![/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/02/mike-johnson-wont-bring-senate-border-bill[/URL]
[QUOTE]....."As speaker Johnson calls this even worse than expected, [b]the lead Republican senator who negotiated the bill, James Langford of Oklahoma[/b], responded to those comments."
[B]LANGFORD: I'm a little confused how it's worse than expected when it builds border wall, expands deportation flights, expands ICE officers, border patrol officers, detention beds, how it creates a faster process for deportation, how it clears up a lot of the long term issues and loopholes that have existed in the asylum law, and it gives us emergency authority that stops the chaos right now on the border. So I'm a little confused. I'll have to be able to get with the speaker's team on that and find out what part would be quote, unquote, worse than what we expected, based on the actual text. Hopefully they've had an opportunity to actually read through the text.[/b][/QUOTE]Otherwise promoted in MSM polls as "handling the border crisis better than Biden and the Dems. " Lololol.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2891045]
Just to be clear, I'm not against transgenders (when transitions are truly justified), but imagine that you have to compete with someone who's a priori faster and stronger than you are. How can you accommodate trans (even if there are very few of them) that wouldn't hurt competing female athletes who don't naturally possess these abilities? Is it even possible at all?[/QUOTE]The 34% number I put up as high schoolers participation rate is for entire student body, trans participation rate is 10-12%, according to some studies. But I used the 34% to demonstrate how miniscule the number is, even after inflated and doubled. The article attached demonstrates how small it really is in certain states. Example of the Article (listed below) states that in Ohio, a larger state had a total of 13 students participated since 2015. I'm going to assume that when you asserted "competing female athletes" it relates to individual like track and field, tennis, wrestling, etc. From the Ohio example, if you factor in team sports (basketball, volleyball, soccer, etc), which I thing would be more appropriate, we're looking at less than 1 person per year.
[URL]https://www.teenvogue.com/story/states-banning-trans-students-from-sports-outnumber-trans-athletes-some-places[/URL]
Your second question, and only considering individual sports, we would have seen domination of titles in every state, which is not true, so it is possible for straight females to defeat trans females in competition. Strongest and fastest don't always win. Usain Bolt had bad days where he's human and loses.
Usain Bolt fastest 100 M is 9. 58/ Flo-Jo is 10.49. Most male Olympians go under 10 seconds. And you can say ah-ha "see? And you would be correct. But we are not talking about the Olympics but rather high schools, where we encourage the kids to go out have fun, be healthy with exercise, and hope they learn about comraderies and friendships (good sportsmanship).
-
Yet another deranged, unhinged, right-wing murderer conspiracist nutjob...
Right-wing Trump deranged nutter, [u]decapitates his own father![/u]
Yet another right-wing nutjob, murderer/killer and Trump cultist, named Justin Mohn, a Pennsylvania (PA) man, murders his father in a [b]cold blooded beheading,[/b] then posts the murdered gruesome corps, online via YouTube.
Once again, the right-wing psycho was acting on the usual dumb right-wing, "Trumpian" psychotic cuckoo paranoid bullshit. And of course the call to arms for so-called "patriots". Apparently he decapitated his father, because he'd worked as federal government employee for 20 years, calling his dad a traitor, along with all government officials.
[b]Justin Mohn charged after allegedly beheading father in Pennsylvania [/b]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/01/31/levittown-pennsylvania-beheading-justin-mohn-youtube/[/URL]
Just another, in a long Line of right-wing nutjob, wacko, brainwashed murderers:[LIST]There's the wackjob with a hammer, who attacked Nancy Pelosi's husband, now up on attempted murder charges, is using the "conspiracy defense".[/LIST][LIST]Or the gunman who opened fire inside a Washington pizzeria, psychoticly motivated by the "Pizziagate" Conspiracy theories.[/LIST][LIST]Or dimwitted and gullible 18 year gunman (mostly heavily radicalized and brainwashed through right-wing online chat groups), who murdered ten in the May 2022 massacre at a grocery store in a predominantly Black, neighborhood in Buffalo, N.Y.[/LIST][LIST]Or the wackjob murderer, who killed five in Colorado Springs, Club Q shooting, largely patronized by the LGBTQ community[/LIST]All have fallen down one or another [b][i]"right-wing conspiracy rabbit-hole"[/b][/i], only to remerge it would seem, as radicalized thugs, gullible foot-soliders and/or murderers and killers bound for [i]"murderer's row"[/i], [i]"an early grave"[/i] or [i]"phoney martyrdom".[/i]
-
Rotflmmfao
You do know that it is the American consumer who ultimately pays those Failed Loser Trump Trade War Trump Tariffs, right?
It is not Indians in India or the Chinese in China who ultimately pay those Trump / Repub hyper inflated prices.
Who Really Pays the Tariffs? USA Firms and Consumers, Through Higher Prices.
Dec. 15,2021.
Oh, Tariffs can be imposed without crippling the domestic economy or reducing jobs creation if the accompanying economic legislation and stewardship is sterling, brilliant, highly effective enough to override the damage done by them. Shhh. Don't tell Larry Summers about that. It would crush him.
Biden / the Dems have been able to manage that result.
Trump / the Repubs did not. And never will. It is simply beyond a Repub's grasp to know how to do that and do it.
-
And why the fuck is a cuban even in a position like this?
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/02/06/house-fails-to-impeach-mayorkas/[/URL]
Why not just let the CCP appoint the guy they wanted to run the CDC CCP virus response.
Oh wait they did, Tony the TURD Fauci.
-
"Apprentice Trump" says..."You're fired!"
Is Trump looking to reprise his dubious TV role in a reboot of Apprentice, once again? Arguably, many would say, was the ONLY job (pretending to be a CEO/Businessman), he was ever qualified in doing.
But with the recent RNC 2020, 2022 (Repub "Pink Trickle" House) and 2023 election primary losses, Trump is poised once again, to cast blame, fault and the onus of the Repub failure, on one of his fellow [b]insurrection "loyalists"[/b] and [b]"lackeys".[/b] Who will it be this time?
Yes, it's painfully clear that, yet another Trump "loyalist", may soon find themselves, being outed under the Apprentice catchphrase, "You're fired!".
[b]Trump indicates it's time for RNC chair Ronna McDaniel to step down...[/b]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-indicates-time-rnc-chair-ronna-mcdaniel-step-rcna137383[/URL]
Oh yeah! Ronna McDanial's (RNC Chair) fate, is all but sealed, as if she were a contestant on said TV show. But however and just maybe, [b]with enough grovelling[/b], sycophants like Ronna McDaniel, can bend the knee (no doubt), and renew her undying pledge, to the Orange Throne?
NOTE: Similar fates and dysfunctional behavior, are also being played-out across the country, as RNC Chair infighting, in several key states, have Repubs continuing to meltdown, in disarray, in this Trump "mob boss" style leadership era.
-
Dems strategy going forward...JUST CALL THEIR BLUFF!!!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2891507]Trump, ChristoFacist Mike and the Repub Pink Tinkle House Majority LOVE and PREFER Open Borders and widespread Fenantyl Addiction so much they simply cannot bring themselves to agree to even put up for a vote the Border Crisis Solution Bill that a Ruby Red Repub Senator from a Ruby Red Repub State negotiated and was quite happy about:
[B]Mike Johnson Won't Bring Senate Border Bill Up For A Vote.
Because you know who is pulling his strings![/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/02/mike-johnson-wont-bring-senate-border-bill[/URL]
Otherwise promoted in MSM polls as "handling the border crisis better than Biden and the Dems. " Lololol.[/QUOTE]
I think President Joe Biden, has figured out Republicans - [b]Just call their "SORRY-ASS" bluffs!!! [/b]
Since it's abundantly clear, Republican politicking, is really just some sort of, butchered western style of [i]"kabuki theater"[/i] and is really all just performative. It stands to reason, the moment you ante up and practically give them everything they want, they pipe-down, shrivel-up and fold-up like a cheap tent.
If it is NOT yet clear to Repubs by now...Biden is playing CHESS to their CHECKER play.
[b]NYT: On the Border, Republicans Set a Trap, Then Fell Into It[/b][LIST][i]"Congressional Republicans thought they had set a clever trap for Democrats that would accomplish complementary political and policy goals.
Their idea was to tie approval of military assistance to Ukraine to tough border security demands that Democrats would never accept, allowing Republicans to block the money for Kyiv that many of them oppose while simultaneously enabling them to pound Democrats for refusing to halt a surge of migrants at the border. It was to be a win-win headed into Novembers elections.
[b]But Democrats tripped them up by offering substantial [u] almost unheard-of concessions[/u][/b] on immigration policy without insisting on much in return. Now it is Republicans who are rapidly abandoning a compromise that gave them much of what they wanted, leaving aid to Ukraine in deep jeopardy, border policy in turmoil and Congress again flailing as multiple crises at home and abroad go without attention because of a legislative stalemate."[/i]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/06/us/politics/border-republicans-ukraine-bill.html[/URL][/LIST]
Yes, at very selective times (like now), I think Dems should call Repubs bluff. Thereby essentially taking away anything the Repubs have to bemoan and [i] "b1tch about"[/i] or campaign on....kkkk!
-
Weekend at Scumbag Joes
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/02/joe-bidens-people-are-all-out-of-excuses/[/URL]
-
True
[QUOTE=Spidy;2891952]I think President Joe Biden, has figured out Republicans - [b]Just call their "SORRY-ASS" bluffs!!! [/b]
Since it's abundantly clear, Republican politicking, is really just some sort of, butchered western style of [i]"kabuki theater"[/i] and is really all just performative. It stands to reason, the moment you ante up and practically give them everything they want, they pipe-down, shrivel-up and fold-up like a cheap tent.
If it is NOT yet clear to Repubs by now...Biden is playing CHESS to their CHECKER play.
[b]NYT: On the Border, Republicans Set a Trap, Then Fell Into It[/b][LIST][i]"Congressional Republicans thought they had set a clever trap for Democrats that would accomplish complementary political and policy goals.
Their idea was to tie approval of military assistance to Ukraine to tough border security demands that Democrats would never accept, allowing Republicans to block the money for Kyiv that many of them oppose while simultaneously enabling them to pound Democrats for refusing to halt a surge of migrants at the border. It was to be a win-win headed into Novembers elections.
[b]But Democrats tripped them up by offering substantial [u] almost unheard-of concessions[/u][/b] on immigration policy without insisting on much in return. Now it is Republicans who are rapidly abandoning a compromise that gave them much of what they wanted, leaving aid to Ukraine in deep jeopardy, border policy in turmoil and Congress again flailing as multiple crises at home and abroad go without attention because of a legislative stalemate."[/i]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/06/us/politics/border-republicans-ukraine-bill.html[/URL][/LIST]
Yes, at very selective times (like now), I think Dems should call Repubs bluff. Thereby essentially taking away anything the Repubs have to bemoan and [i] "b1tch about"[/i] or campaign on....kkkk![/QUOTE]However, Trump TV will still lie about it in order to bamboozle the dumb Repub hillbillies who fall for his shit to continue supporting and voting for Trump and his Repub Party of Open Borders, High Crime, Economic Disasters, Massive Jobs Destruction, Repeal of Democracy and Replace it with Authoritarian Dictatorships at Home and Abroad, etc;.
[B]Border deal sponsors went on Fox News to debunk a false claim about the bill. Fox kept spreading it.
The network continues to spread the falsehood that border deal will allow 5,000 migrants across the border every day. The bill would actually trigger a wave of new border restrictions.[/B]
[URL]https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-news/border-deal-sponsors-went-fox-news-debunk-false-claim-about-bill-fox-kept-spreading-it[/URL]
Pro Repub Media don't even wait for a few minutes of history to pass before launching into their classic Twisty Repub Revisionist History of it! LOL.
-
Storm in a teapot.
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2891563]The 34% number I put up as high schoolers participation rate is for entire student body, trans participation rate is 10-12%, according to some studies. But I used the 34% to demonstrate how miniscule the number is, even after inflated and doubled. The article attached demonstrates how small it really is in certain states. Example of the Article (listed below) states that in Ohio, a larger state had a total of 13 students participated since 2015. I'm going to assume that when you asserted "competing female athletes" it relates to individual like track and field, tennis, wrestling, etc. From the Ohio example, if you factor in team sports (basketball, volleyball, soccer, etc), which I thing would be more appropriate, we're looking at less than 1 person per year.
[URL]https://www.teenvogue.com/story/states-banning-trans-students-from-sports-outnumber-trans-athletes-some-places[/URL]
Your second question, and only considering individual sports, we would have seen domination of titles in every state, which is not true, so it is possible for straight females to defeat trans females in competition. Strongest and fastest don't always win. Usain Bolt had bad days where he's human and loses.
Usain Bolt fastest 100 M is 9. 58/ Flo-Jo is 10.49. Most male Olympians go under 10 seconds. And you can say ah-ha "see? And you would be correct. But we are not talking about the Olympics but rather high schools, where we encourage the kids to go out have fun, be healthy with exercise, and hope they learn about comraderies and friendships (good sportsmanship).[/QUOTE]This is a eye-opening article, thanks. I must concur.
[QUOTE]Fischer, the Post reports, is the only known transgender student athlete in the state.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]In Utah, one of the states where a judge has temporarily blocked a sports ban, parents lodged formal complaints after one student excelled beyond her competitors in a state-level competition last year, according to the Deseret News. The complaints resulted in an investigation into whether the student is transgender (she is not). According to the Post, Utah has 75,000 student athletes in the state. Only four of them are transgender."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Ohio is currently considering a ban on transgender students in sports, after the state House of Representatives passed a bill that would do as much in June. The initial bill would have required genital inspections on any student whose biological sex was disputed, but that measure has since been removed, according to The Hill. But the Cleveland Scene reports that [b]of the 400,000 student athletes in Ohio, only 13 since 2015 have been transgender, and only three have competed at the high school level.[/b][/QUOTE]My goodness, what a bunch of morons!
-
You do know
"You do know that it is the American consumer who ultimately pays those Failed Loser Trump Trade War Trump Tariffs, right?
It is not Indians in India or the Chinese in China who ultimately pay those Trump / Repub hyper inflated prices.
Who Really Pays the Tariffs? USA Firms and Consumers, Through Higher Prices.
Dec. 15,2021.
[URL]https://taxfoundation.org/blog/who-really-pays-tariffs/[/URL]
Oh, Tariffs can be imposed without crippling the domestic economy or reducing jobs creation if the accompanying economic legislation and stewardship is sterling, brilliant, highly effective enough to override the damage done by them. Shhh. Don't tell Larry Summers about that. It would crush him.
Biden / the Dems have been able to manage that result.
Trump / the Repubs did not. And never will. It is simply beyond a Repub's grasp to know how to do that and do it. ".
What do we know?
We know all of you evil mofos hate the USA.
Like you, you haven't stepped a toe inside the USA in 12+ yrs and never plan on returning (if I was president your citizenship would be revoked).
(you're so pro illegal alien, I would give your citizenship to someone else).
You are pro anything, anti USA.
And pro anything pro CCP.
Lets hear your "honest" (LMFAO) opinion of TPP?
If tariffs are bad for the USA why does the CCP and you (and tiny12) hate them so much.
CCP tariffs imposed on the CCP have brought down prices their which have saved the USA economy.
From the likes of Scumbag Joe and Scumbag Nancy.
Joe Manchin also helped by blocking BBB Scumbag Joe tried destroying the USA with.
I think Manchin would be a decent President he and I see things very similarly!!
-
Uh
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2892027]"You do know that it is the American consumer who ultimately pays those Failed Loser Trump Trade War Trump Tariffs, right?
It is not Indians in India or the Chinese in China who ultimately pay those Trump / Repub hyper inflated prices.
Who Really Pays the Tariffs? USA Firms and Consumers, Through Higher Prices.
Dec. 15,2021.
[URL]https://taxfoundation.org/blog/who-really-pays-tariffs/[/URL]
Oh, Tariffs can be imposed without crippling the domestic economy or reducing jobs creation if the accompanying economic legislation and stewardship is sterling, brilliant, highly effective enough to override the damage done by them. Shhh. Don't tell Larry Summers about that. It would crush him.
Biden / the Dems have been able to manage that result.
Trump / the Repubs did not. And never will. It is simply beyond a Repub's grasp to know how to do that and do it. ".
What do we know?
We know all of you evil mofos hate the USA.
Like you, you haven't stepped a toe inside the USA in 12+ yrs and never plan on returning (if I was president your citizenship would be revoked).[/QUOTE]You're now arguing that Chinese tariffs imposed on Chinese imports brought down Inflation / Prices on those goods their / there and that saved the USA economy?
I'm not even sure what to put into a Google Search to find out what the hell you are talking about and where the hell you picked up such an idea.
Is that a new mentally deranged Twisty Repub Trump concoction to revise the historical fact that his economic and national security policies and stewardship produced the worst results of all time?
-
"You're now arguing that Chinese tariffs imposed on Chinese imports brought down Inflation / Prices on those goods their / there and that saved the USA economy?
I'm not even sure what to put into a Google Search to find out what the hell you are talking about and where the hell you picked up such an idea.
Is that a new mentally deranged Twisty Repub Trump concoction to revise the historical fact that his economic and national security policies and stewardship produced the worst results of all time?
Yes saved the USA from a horrible mentally defective Scumbag Joe / Democrat recession.
As did Manchin blocking BBB.
-
More Trump Revisionist History? AKA Lies?
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2892238]"You're now arguing that Chinese tariffs imposed on Chinese imports brought down Inflation / Prices on those goods their / there and that saved the USA economy?
I'm not even sure what to put into a Google Search to find out what the hell you are talking about and where the hell you picked up such an idea.
Is that a new mentally deranged Twisty Repub Trump concoction to revise the historical fact that his economic and national security policies and stewardship produced the worst results of all time?
Yes saved the USA from a horrible mentally defective Scumbag Joe / Democrat recession.
As did Manchin blocking BBB.[/QUOTE]Well, now that is very interesting considering Trump's Tariffs didn't do one good thing for the USA economy any more than his $2+Trillion deficit addition TCJA created more jobs with it than without it or his defunding and removal of the Pandemic Prevention and Response teams from those Chinese labs 5 months before the first Covid cases emerged there or his lying about it in sync with Xi's wishes all through 2020 did.
But after Biden and the Dems proposed, fought for and passed the American Rescue Plan, the Chips and Science Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, Infrastructure DECADE, along with supporting Union AND Non Union jobs, wage gains, all producing more jobs and wage gains under Bidenomic than under any Repub or two even three Repubs of the past 100 years or so ever produced in their entire so-called presidencies as well as lowering crime was in some way due to the extra consumer tax every American had to pay in tariffs Trump stupidly imposed that drove the USA Agriculture and Manufacturing industries into recession even before Trump's Pandemic Mass Murdered a million Americans and wiped out Tens on Millons of jobs?
LOL. Good thinking. Trump must have come up with that idiocy for you, right?
-
Trump and Repubs are as FAKE as...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2892306]More Trump Revisionist History? AKA Lies? ...
But after Biden and the Dems proposed, fought for and passed the American Rescue Plan, the Chips and Science Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, Infrastructure DECADE, along with supporting Union AND Non Union jobs, wage gains, all producing more jobs and wage gains under Bidenomic than under any Repub or two even three Repubs of the past 100 years or so ever produced in their entire so-called presidencies as well as lowering crime was in some way due to the extra consumer tax every American had to pay in tariffs Trump stupidly imposed that drove the USA Agriculture and Manufacturing industries into recession even before Trump's Pandemic Mass Murdered a million Americans and wiped out Tens on Millons of jobs?
LOL. Good thinking. Trump must have come up with that idiocy for you, right?[/QUOTE]Agreed.
Yes, revisionist history, lies, innuendo, obfuscation, fake impeachments, falsehoods, false equivalencies, projection, fake "photoshopped" Hunter Biden texts messages by Bryon Donald (R-FL), Taylor Swift boogeyman/women, purple dinosaurs/Teletubbie culture wars and QAnon conspiracies is all they have left, [U][i][b]in that proverbial "political fuel tank".[/b][/i][/U].
Take the one of the latest Trump fueled, fake-ass and staged stunts he pulled, when trying to rival [B]President Joe Biden's success[/B] and solidarity win, with the UAW labour strikes. Note, this was the very 1st time a sitting US President had ever jointed the picket-line of striking auto workers, which had a whooping support of 75% of Americans.
So naturally and not wanting to be outdone, but true to form, as he's done in the past, fraudster Trump pays for [I]"kabuki theater" style[/I] auto union rally.
New campaign finance filings, show [B]Trump paid $20,000[/B] to the [B]nonunion auto parts plant (MI)[/B] [Sept 27, 2023], he used to stage the event and had NON-UNION WORKERS and ACTORS, to hold up signs to [B]pretending[/B] to be union workers. Many of the fake signs said "union members for Trump" and "auto workers for Trump" and all of the people interviewed, holding the signs, turned out to be neither.
Trump and Repubs, are just simply a fake, embarrassing and dangerous cult!
-
And now my assertion is confirmed
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2888268]Originally Posted by Elvis2008
But this is just Xpartan and his Democratic name calling brain at work. If you are against the billions being poured down the drain in Ukraine, your sole reason for wanting that according to him is you love Putin and want to suck his dick.[/QUOTE]Does anyone still have any doubts about MAGA's dick-sucking priorities?
[QUOTE][b]Why MAGA Loves Russia and Hates Ukraine[/b]
As I type this newsletter, continued American aid for Ukraine is in grave doubt. Tucker Carlson is in Moscow to conduct a friendly interview with Vladimir Putin. And were receiving reports from the front lines that Russia is advancing, in part because of Ukrainian ammunition shortages. In short, the war is reaching a critical stage, and Ukraine may lose because Republicans are willing to hand authoritarian Russia a historic military victory rather than supply further aid to a democratic ally.
Ronald Reagan isnt just rolling over in his grave; he may also lurch from it in a fit of incredulous rage. This is a remarkable and potentially catastrophic reversal by a political party that is in a state of near-total, frequently random ideological transformation.
To explain the intensity of Republican resistance to Ukraine aid, I need to return to a concept I wrote about in November: that of bespoke realities. My friend Rene DiResta, the technical research manager at the Stanford Internet Observatory, coined the term, and she wrote that it refers to the bubble realities constructed by communities that operate with their own norms, media, trusted authorities and frameworks of facts.
Among those who oppose aid to Ukraine, there are certainly several paleoconservatives who object on classic isolationist grounds: Its not our fight, our support is costly, we might find ourselves inadvertently embroiled in war, and so on. But the mass Republican movement against Ukraine is rooted far less in policy than it is in a particular bespoke reality of the MAGA universe, in which Ukraine is a pernicious villain, Putin is a flawed hero and Russia should have crushed Ukraine long ago.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/08/opinion/why-maga-loves-russia-and-hates-ukraine.html[/URL]
-
Yes, Trump has to do that.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2892510]Agreed.
Yes, revisionist history, lies, innuendo, obfuscation, fake impeachments, falsehoods, false equivalencies, projection, fake "photoshopped" Hunter Biden texts messages by Bryon Donald (R-FL), Taylor Swift boogeyman/women, purple dinosaurs/Teletubbie culture wars and QAnon conspiracies is all they have left, [U][i][b]in that proverbial "political fuel tank".[/b][/i][/U].
Take the one of the latest Trump fueled, fake-ass and staged stunts he pulled, when trying to rival [B]President Joe Biden's success[/B] and solidarity win, with the UAW labour strikes. Note, this was the very 1st time a sitting US President had ever jointed the picket-line of striking auto workers, which had a whooping support of 75% of Americans.
So naturally and not wanting to be outdone, but true to form, as he's done in the past, fraudster Trump pays for [I]"kabuki theater" style[/I] auto union rally.
New campaign finance filings, show [B]Trump paid $20,000[/B] to the [B]nonunion auto parts plant (MI)[/B] Sept 27, 2023, he used to stage the event and had NON-UNION WORKERS and ACTORS, to hold up signs to [B]pretending[/B] to be union workers. Many of the fake signs said "union members for Trump" and "auto workers for Trump" and all of the people interviewed, holding the signs, turned out to be neither.
Trump and Repubs, are just simply a fake, embarrassing and dangerous cult![/QUOTE]Trump paying actors to pretend to support him goes back to the very beginning of his Trump Brand Infomercial so-called presidential run.
Your example:
[B]Trump paid $20,000 to rent plant for fake union auto worker event: filing.
Feb 5, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://news.yahoo.com/trump-paid-20-000-rent-061218337.html[/URL]
And in the beginning:
[B]Donald Trump reportedly paid actors $50 to cheer for him at his 2016 announcement.
June 18, 2015[/B]
[URL]https://www.businessinsider.com/paid-actors-at-donald-trump-announcement-2015-6[/URL]
Trump knew from his years as a teleprompter-reading fake successful businessman game show host that if you falsely portray yourself as popular or highly regarded among at least some people somewhere and often enough there is a good chance the most gullible, lonely, weak-minded rubes out there will eventually consider you their lord and savior.
-
Someone just put a bullet in the Scumbgs head already and end all our misery
[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2024/02/08/biden-calls-egypts-sisi-president-of-mexico-after-blasting-memory-concerns-from-special-counsel-report/?sh=4d85fbfa7f83[/URL]
Like they do on the farm!!
-
Did ISG Pinocchio call my post lies LMFAO
"Well, now that is very interesting considering Trump's Tariffs didn't do one good thing for the USA economy any more than his $2+Trillion deficit addition TCJA created more jobs with it than without it or his defunding and removal of the Pandemic Prevention and Response teams from those Chinese labs 5 months before the first Covid cases emerged there or his lying about it in sync with Xi's wishes all through 2020 did.
But after Biden and the Dems proposed, fought for and passed the American Rescue Plan, the Chips and Science Act, the Inflation Reduction Act, Infrastructure DECADE, along with supporting Union AND Non Union jobs, wage gains, all producing more jobs and wage gains under Bidenomic than under any Repub or two even three Repubs of the past 100 years or so ever produced in their entire so-called presidencies as well as lowering crime was in some way due to the extra consumer tax every American had to pay in tariffs Trump stupidly imposed that drove the USA Agriculture and Manufacturing industries into recession even before Trump's Pandemic Mass Murdered a million Americans and wiped out Tens on Millons of jobs?
LOL. Good thinking. Trump must have come up with that idiocy for you, right?
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4458073-biden-special-council-report-harris/[/URL]
-
Lolol
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2892604][URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2024/02/08/biden-calls-egypts-sisi-president-of-mexico-after-blasting-memory-concerns-from-special-counsel-report/?sh=4d85fbfa7f83[/URL]
Like they do on the farm!![/QUOTE]Biden was justifiably angry. He was referring to a border issue. He got the leader's name right but obviously had the border with Mexico on his mind as well, likely from having just engaged in a few hours working on convincing Open Borders Repubs to finally fund the border protections they have been squealing like stuck pigs about for years.
A one word misspeak like the one Biden made happens with professional media hosts reading a teleprompter every 30 minutes.
Now, if Biden had said, "Mexico Mexico Mexico Mexico" without even noticing he got it wrong, I would worry about his mental capacity.
If Biden had said, "I talked to the Covfefe of Mexico Mexico Mexico Mexico", then I would say he is ready for the loony bin today.
But he didn't.
Also, by stark contrast, Nancy or is it Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Trump and his numbskull kids have in just the past 1-2 years admitted under Oath that "I don't recall" well over 100 times among them on critical legal questions, not just 2-3 times.
I love that a lifelong Repub Special Prosecutor Trump administration appointee has put a partisan Repub James Comey-style inapproriate political spin out there to the effect that a "Well-meaning, sympathetic old Dem with a poor memory" can and has whipped the piss out of every Repub so-called potus in history on economic, national security, lower crime, jobs creation, wage growth, GDP Growth and Stock Market Gains results. Lolol.
-
The King of whataboutism strikes AGAIN
"Biden was justifiably angry. He was referring to a border issue. He got the leader's name right but obviously had the border with Mexico on his mind as well, likely from having just engaged in a few hours working on convincing Open Borders Repubs to finally fund the border protections they have been squealing like stuck pigs about for years.
A one word misspeak like the one Biden made happens with professional media hosts reading a teleprompter every 30 minutes.
Now, if Biden had said, "Mexico Mexico Mexico Mexico" without even noticing he got it wrong, I would worry about his mental capacity.
If Biden had said, "I talked to the Covfefe of Mexico Mexico Mexico Mexico", then I would say he is ready for the loony bin today.
But he didn't.
Also, by stark contrast, Nancy or is it Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Trump and his numbskull kids have in just the past 1-2 years admitted under Oath that "I don't recall" well over 100 times among them on critical legal questions, not just 2-3 times.
I love that a lifelong Repub Special Prosecutor Trump administration appointee has put a partisan Repub James Comey-style inapproriate political spin out there to the effect that a "Well-meaning, sympathetic old Dem with a poor memory" can and has whipped the piss out of every Repub so-called potus in history on economic, national security, lower crime, jobs creation, wage growth, GDP Growth and Stock Market Gains results. Lolol. ".
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/trumps-big-day/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=featured-content-trending&utm_term=third[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/im-finally-beginning-to-believe-its-possible-joe-biden-steps-down/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=blog-post&utm_campaign=river&utm_content=top-bar-latest&utm_term=second[/URL]
LMFAO.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2892516]Does anyone still have any doubts about MAGA's dick-sucking priorities? As I type this newsletter, continued American aid for Ukraine is in grave doubt. Tucker Carlson is in Moscow to conduct a friendly interview with Vladimir Putin. And were receiving reports from the front lines that Russia is advancing, in part because of Ukrainian ammunition shortages. In short, the war is reaching a critical stage, and Ukraine may lose because Republicans are willing to hand authoritarian Russia a historic military victory rather than supply further aid to a democratic ally.
[/QUOTE]Oh, I see. If Ukraine wins, it is because of Democrats. If it loses, it is due to Republicans. This is what I mean about being a Democratic douche.
So the interview had not even happened, but the NY Times called it "friendly". This is the paper that likes to call itself the paper of record literally being douche like and commenting on something that had not even happened as fact.
And if you are a Democratic douche, you do not need to see this interview. You do not need to listen to Putin. We will tell you what to think about Putin. You are a MAGA POS loser if you actually listen to Putin and make up your own mind about what he said. You can ignore the whole thing because it is "friendly". It is propaganda. We the NYT will tell you what to think.
Of course, I watched the interview. Tucker brought up Nordstream and who Putin thought blew it up. He did not say. He said look at who is capable and who said they would. Of course, he meant the USA. He then said of Germany that it is paying through the nose for LNG versus getting gas from Russia. The economic sanctions that were supposed to be so effective have hurt Germany more than Russia and Russia has overtaken Germany as Europe's largest economy. [URL]https://www.intellinews.com/russia-overtakes-germany-to-become-fifth-biggest-economy-in-the-world-in-gdp-on-a-ppp-basis-286944/[/URL]#text=Looking%20 at%20 GDP%20 in%20 PPP, in%20 Europe%2 see%20 worth%20%245.3%20 trillion.
And Russia was supposed to be hurting so.
Then of course, there was the dollar, the basis for American power. Putin cannot believe that the dollar, the cornerstone of American power, is being tossed away. He said Russia has gone from doing 50% of its transactions in dollars to 13%. For those of us who understand economics, we want there always to be a high demand for the dollar. Putin is asking why are you messing with that demand.
What I see is Americans losing. I see Germans losing. I see Russians losing. I see Ukrainians losing. The only winners I see are neocons and the American military industrial complex. They have won and are winning. And they are trying to convince everyone that victory over Russia, whatever that means, is worth the price, any price, so they can keep on winning.
-
Lmfao
"Does anyone still have any doubts about MAGA's dick-sucking priorities?
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/08/opinion/why-maga-loves-russia-and-hates-ukraine.html[/URL]".
MAGA Republicans' hatred and contempt for Volodymyr Zelensky and the Ukrainian cause is shockingly vehement. Candace Owens says she wants to "punch" Zelensky. Donald Trump Jr. Calls him an "international welfare queen. " Carlson says he dresses "like the manager of a strip club. " It's all bizarre and unreasonable. And it all fits the broader MAGA narrative.
Let's break it down, step by step. First, if you're stumped by the notion that Ukraine is a villain, you may need reminding of a conspiracy theory that is now largely forgotten but was prevalent on the right at the time of Donald Trump's first impeachment. In his infamous conversation with Zelensky — the one that triggered the impeachment — Trump asked Zelensky about a "CrowdStrike" server allegedly being held in Ukraine.
This is a reference to a longstanding MAGA claim that it was Ukraine and not Russia that interfered with the 2016 election. There's no evidence of any kind to support the allegation, and Trump's own advisers repeatedly debunked it. But my Times colleague Scott Shane described how the theory gained purchase on the right nonetheless. "On 4 chan and pro-Trump spaces on Reddit, on websites like [URL]ZeroHedge.com[/URL] and Washington's Blog," he wrote in 2019, "you can find plenty of speculation about evil manipulation by CrowdStrike and secret maneuvers by Ukrainians — often inflamed by Mr. Trump's own statements. ".
Combine that claim with the fact that Hunter Biden had a lucrative business relationship with the Ukrainian energy company Burisma, and MAGA found itself with the perfect villain to counter the Trump-Russia narrative. Trump wasn't in bed with a hostile power in Russia; the Democrats were in bed with a hostile power in Ukraine.
But it goes further still. To MAGA, Putin isn't just innocent; he's admirable. Heroic, even, in some ways. He isn't defined as an authoritarian dictator at the helm of one of America's chief geopolitical rivals. No, he's defined as an anti-woke leader who defends Christian civilization by taking on the decadent West.
In a 2017 speech at Hillsdale College, the Claremont Institute's Christopher Caldwell declared that if "we were to use traditional measures for understanding leaders, which involve the defense of borders and national flourishing, Putin would count as the pre-eminent statesman of our time. " In Caldwell's words, Putin "is not the president of a feminist NGO. He is not a transgender-rights activist. He is not an ombudsman appointed by the United Nations to make and deliver slide shows about green energy. ".
In 2021, The American Conservative's Rod Dreher praised a Putin speech condemning the West and said that Putin and Hungary's Viktor Orban were "completely clear and completely correct on the society-destroying nature of wokeness and postliberal leftism. " (It should be noted that Dreher has nonetheless unequivocally condemned Putin's invasion.) A 2022 exchange between Steve Bannon and Erik Prince, the founder of private military contractor Blackwater, was even more illustrative. Bannon hosted Prince on his podcast shortly after Putin's invasion and proclaimed Putin "anti-woke. " Prince replied supportively that the people of Russia "still know which bathroom to use. " And Bannon kept the thought alive, asking, "How many genders are there in Russia?
Jordan Peterson, meanwhile, went so far as to imply that Russia's aggressive attack may have been merely self-defense against the threat of Western cultural decadence. The culture war, he mused, may be "serious enough to increase the probability that Russia, say, will be motivated to invade and potentially incapacitate Ukraine merely to keep the pathological West out of that country, which is a key part of the historically Russian sphere of influence. ".
There is an old saying: The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Ideally, the phrase means that Americans set aside their domestic differences to address foreign threats to the nation. But in this hyperpolarized era, the far right gets this equation precisely backward. They are aiding Vladimir Putin because they see him, too, as opposed to their domestic enemies.
Before the war, MAGA's combination of hostility toward Ukraine and admiration of Putin created a very particular narrative: Rugged, manly, traditional Russia was physically and spiritually stronger than the liberalizing West, and it would roll over Ukraine with only token resistance. Indeed, before the war, Ted Cruz shared a tweet in which he contrasted Russian and American military ads. The USA Ad, he claimed, showed our military to be "woke" and "emasculated. " But the Russian ad reeked of masculine aggression. How could the West — let alone tiny Ukraine — stand against such manly men?
-
"Biden was justifiably angry. He was referring to a border issue. He got the leader's name right but obviously had the border with Mexico on his mind as well, likely from having just engaged in a few hours working on convincing Open Borders Repubs to finally fund the border protections they have been squealing like stuck pigs about for years.
A one word misspeak like the one Biden made happens with professional media hosts reading a teleprompter every 30 minutes.
Now, if Biden had said, "Mexico Mexico Mexico Mexico" without even noticing he got it wrong, I would worry about his mental capacity.
If Biden had said, "I talked to the Covfefe of Mexico Mexico Mexico Mexico", then I would say he is ready for the loony bin today.
But he didn't.
Also, by stark contrast, Nancy or is it Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Trump and his numbskull kids have in just the past 1-2 years admitted under Oath that "I don't recall" well over 100 times among them on critical legal questions, not just 2-3 times.
I love that a lifelong Repub Special Prosecutor Trump administration appointee has put a partisan Repub James Comey-style inapproriate political spin out there to the effect that a "Well-meaning, sympathetic old Dem with a poor memory" can and has whipped the piss out of every Repub so-called potus in history on economic, national security, lower crime, jobs creation, wage growth, GDP Growth and Stock Market Gains results. Lolol. ".
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/02/09/carney-on-kudlow-bidens-mental-incompetency-was-only-revealed-to-give-the-fbi-an-excuse-not-to-prosecute-him/[/URL]
-
Uh
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2892767]"Biden was justifiably angry. He was referring to a border issue. He got the leader's name right but obviously had the border with Mexico on his mind as well, likely from having just engaged in a few hours working on convincing Open Borders Repubs to finally fund the border protections they have been squealing like stuck pigs about for years.
A one word misspeak like the one Biden made happens with professional media hosts reading a teleprompter every 30 minutes.
Now, if Biden had said, "Mexico Mexico Mexico Mexico" without even noticing he got it wrong, I would worry about his mental capacity.
If Biden had said, "I talked to the Covfefe of Mexico Mexico Mexico Mexico", then I would say he is ready for the loony bin today.[/QUOTE]The longtime hardcore Trumpster Repub Special Prosecutor did not indict Joe Biden because Joe Biden did not ignore a subpoena to give back the relatively few classified documents his staff packed, did not defiantly and criminally announce, "They are MINE! They belong to ME"! He did not then try to hide them. He did not then suggest anyone else hide them. Joe Biden, unlike Trump, is too lucid, too aware, too cognitively competent to do something that ridiculously stupid in the first place or as spectacularly stupid as to think he could get away with it in the second place.
It's pretty simple really.
Re your link; Who the hell would listen to Kudlow regarding anything related to the economy, much less anyone affiliated with Breitbart appearing on Kudlow supposedly knowledgeable about the economy? Lolol.
If only they could have found Trump wandering aimlessly around the nearest KFC kitchen and led him by the hand to the studio, that would have represented a Historic Summit Meeting of Economic Ignoramuses.
[B]President Drink Bleach says what? Trump now claims he beat George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
Trump was already dumb, but he's getting worse yet MAGA doesn't care. The press should cover his decline anyway.[/B]
[URL]https://www.salon.com/2023/09/27/drink-bleach-says-what-now-claims-he-beat-george-w-bush-and-barack-obama/[/URL]
-
Scumbag Biden and the DNC are taking their cues from
Bangladesh and Pakistan.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/10/world/asia/pakistan-election-imran-kahn.html[/URL]
They are trying to turn us into a 3rd world shithole, just look at the southern border.
-
Elvis doesn't disappoint.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2892741]Oh, I see. If Ukraine wins, it is because of Democrats. If it loses, it is due to Republicans. This is what I mean about being a Democratic douche.
So the interview had not even happened, but the NY Times called it "friendly". This is the paper that likes to call itself the paper of record literally being douche like and commenting on something that had not even happened as fact.
And if you are a Democratic douche, you do not need to see this interview. You do not need to listen to Putin. We will tell you what to think about Putin. You are a MAGA POS loser if you actually listen to Putin and make up your own mind about what he said. You can ignore the whole thing because it is "friendly". It is propaganda. We the NYT will tell you what to think.
Of course, I watched the interview. Tucker brought up Nordstream and who Putin thought blew it up. He did not say. He said look at who is capable and who said they would. Of course, he meant the USA. He then said of Germany that it is paying through the nose for LNG versus getting gas from Russia. The economic sanctions that were supposed to be so effective have hurt Germany more than Russia and Russia has overtaken Germany as Europe's largest economy. [URL]https://www.intellinews.com/russia-overtakes-germany-to-become-fifth-biggest-economy-in-the-world-in-gdp-on-a-ppp-basis-286944/[/URL]#text=Looking%20 at%20 GDP%20 in%20 PPP, in%20 Europe%2 see%20 worth%20%245.3%20 trillion.
Then of course, there was the dollar, the basis for American power. Putin cannot believe that the dollar, the cornerstone of American power, is being tossed away. He said Russia has gone from doing 50% of its transactions in dollars to 13%. For those of us who understand economics, we want there always to be a high demand for the dollar. Putin is asking why are you messing with that demand.
What I see is Americans losing. I see Germans losing. I see Russians losing. I see Ukrainians losing. The only winners I see are neocons and the American military industrial complex. They have won and are winning. And they are trying to convince everyone that victory over Russia, whatever that means, is worth the price, any price, so they can keep on winning.[/QUOTE]Here we are again. All over the place as always with your pointless ramblings, deflecting from a very simple fact.
Right-wing Republicans, just like their lord and savior, love sucking Putin's dick. Nothing else would explain why they hate Ukraine so much.
That's the main reason why the wingers-hijacked House won't give money to Ukraine.
The second reason is also quite simple: When their lord and savior tells them to jump, they jump as high as they can and never ask any questions.
The third reason: It's in their DNA to sabotage Dems, the less sense it makes -- the better.
The end.
-
You nailed it
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2892905][b]Elvis doesn't disappoint [/b]
Here we are again. All over the place as always with your pointless ramblings, deflecting from a very simple fact.
Right-wing Republicans, just like their lord and savior, love sucking Putin's dick. Nothing else would explain why they hate Ukraine so much.
That's the main reason why the wingers-hijacked House won't give money to Ukraine.
The second reason is also quite simple: When their lord and savior tells them to jump, they jump as high as they can and never ask any questions.
The third reason: It's in their DNA to sabotage Dems, the less sense it makes -- the better.
The end.[/QUOTE]I would only add that they do ask one question when their confused and blithering America-hating lord and savior tells them to jump; they ask "How high"? And they ask it [I]on the way UP[/I].
The latest blithering and lying from their lord and savior:
[B]A list of lies Trump told tonight.
in addition to slurring his words, confusing what time and day it is, and pledging to repeal every gun safety law.[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/02/biden-harris-campaign-hits-trump-lie[/URL]
See link for the list of lies, too many to copy and paste here.
BTW, how many Mainstream Media outlets rushed to devote an hour to the fact that Trump referred to it being Saturday in that Festival of Lies when it was actually Friday?
LOL. Of course, it is possible that MSM merely assumed that was another of his lies for whatever inexplicable reason and, as is their latest aid to getting him back in the White House, choose to protect him by declining to cover his thousands upon thousands of lies in their outlets anymore.
-
Information overload?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2892958]BTW, how many Mainstream Media outlets rushed to devote an hour to the fact that Trump referred to it being Saturday in that Festival of Lies when it was actually Friday?
LOL. Of course, it is possible that MSM merely assumed that was another of his lies for whatever inexplicable reason and, as is their latest aid to getting him back in the White House, choose to protect him by declining to cover his thousands upon thousands of lies in their outlets anymore.[/QUOTE]Good question. I guess, MSM are so used to his insanity over the years that they don't even notice. In other words, it's not the news anymore.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2892905]Right-wing Republicans, just like their lord and savior, love sucking Putin's dick. Nothing else would explain why they hate Ukraine so much.
That's the main reason why the wingers-hijacked House won't give money to Ukraine.
The end.[/QUOTE]Other part that was crazy with Putin interview is Putin confirmed something everyone who follows the Ukraine War knew: Ukraine and Russia had a peace deal and Boris Johnson destroyed it. My guess is he did so after being told to by Biden, but that is not fact.
So Putin does the interview, confirms this already known fact, but now that this fact is much more widely known, and Bojo fucking loses it. [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/boris-johnson-has-meltdown-after-being-exposed-sabotaging-ukraine-peace-deal[/URL].
In his video, this asshole Bojo does not even deny it.
Xpartan, you try to make this a red-blue conservative-liberal issue but it is not. It is neocon, pro military industrial complex people versus everyone else. Nikki Haley would be the same type of war monger Biden is.
If a few million Ukrainians and Russians have to die so the defense contractors can make their billions, you are like, so be it.
Thing is after Russiagate, who should Republicans trust? We know the intelligence agencies and you Democratic douches lied your asses off about Russiagate and now it is more of the same. If we do not save Ukraine, all of Europe is going to fall right?
\
-
Yes
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2893102]Good question. I guess, MSM are so used to his insanity over the years that they don't even notice. In other words, it's not the news anymore.[/QUOTE]From the moment Trump descended that escalator, fact checking and correcting his 30,000++ publicly stated lies has been like trying to catch confetti.
Same with the incidence of his slurred speech, garbled grammar, incoherent blather, invented words, etc.
I suppose it is always possible that when he lies about, say, having won Pennsylvania in the general elections, beaten Barack Obama, created "the best economy ever", "kept the country safe", "no wars on my watch" and so on that he is not lying so much as he really forgot what happened in just the past 4-5 years due to his severe cognitive impairment.
LOL. On a related note, it's hard to top Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley or is it Nancy Pelosi demanding cognitive tests for presidential candidates and in the very next breath misstating the date of The 9/11 Attack! Lolol.
[B]Haley Misstates 9/11 Attack Date After Calling For Cognitive Tests.[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/02/haley-misstates-911-attack-date-after[/URL]
[QUOTE]"The last thing we ever want to do is side with Russia," she said during a defense of NATO. "What we always need to remember is America needs to have friends."
"[B]After September 10th[/b], we needed a lot of friends," Haley added. "We can never get to the point where we don't need friends."[/QUOTE]First question on the test for Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley or is it Nancy;.
Who is buried in Grant's Tomb?
Surely, Fux News and every Mainstream Media outlet will devote an hour of prime time to Nikki Nancy getting the date of The 9/11 Attack wrong. LOL.
-
Trumpian Backwater Economics for Dummies...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2892741] ... Then of course, there was the dollar, the basis for American power. Putin cannot believe that the dollar, the cornerstone of American power, is being tossed away. He said Russia has gone from doing 50% of its transactions in dollars to 13%. [b][i][u]For those of us who understand economics[/u][/i][/b], we want there always to be a high demand for the dollar. Putin is asking why are you messing with that demand. ...[/QUOTE]
(...kkkk!) Oh please, spare me your backwater economics!
Ahh, last I checked, ELVIS 2008, you still hadn't simply [i]"stuck your head out the window"[/i], and taken a good hard look, at how strong and resilient, President Joe Biden's economy has been, like I metaphorically (and somewhat perhaps literally in your case) said you should.
But instead it would seem, [b]you still have your head up your ass.[/b] No doubt still pining, hoping and praying for a RECESSION/DEPRESSION, just like your feckless "Loud and Save-ur-Dumbass".
So forgive me if I take issue with ANY Trumpian DUMBASS BULLSHIT economics, you maybe shoveling, today, or any other day!
[i]"For those of us who understand economics"[/i]...indeed! [b](...kkkk!)[/b]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2893285]So forgive me if I take issue with ANY Trumpian DUMBASS BULLSHIT economics, you maybe shoveling, today, or any other day!
[/QUOTE]What does Trump have to do with any of this? Oh right. You cannot post anything without blaming him for all the world's ills. Classic TDS.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2893285](...kkkk!) Oh please, spare me your backwater economics![/QUOTE]Spidy, do you live in the USA? Or are you like Tooms lecturing us about how things are in the USA from thousands of miles away?
Have you ever been to a country where there is zero demand for the currency? It is not pretty.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2893285]Ahh, last I checked, ELVIS 2008, you still hadn't simply [i]"stuck your head out the window"[/i], and taken a good hard look, at how strong and resilient, President Joe Biden's economy has been, like I metaphorically (and somewhat perhaps literally in your case) said you should.
But instead it would seem, [b]you still have your head up your ass.[/b] No doubt still pining, hoping and praying for a RECESSION/DEPRESSION, just like your feckless "Loud and Save-ur-Dumbass".[/QUOTE]John Oliver had a hilarious video on Chuck E Cheese here. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v6y2pY1pZ0.[/URL] he was going to do it on home owners associations and then changed his mind saying, "If you are under 35, you will never, ever, ever be able to afford house. " which is totally true.
So yeah, if you are in the stock market or own a house, then fuck yeah, Biden has been great. The rich have gotten richer. If not, you are getting your ass kicked. Housing prices are up 45% since Biden took office.
The economy is okay. It is not great. If it were great, and I went to a popular strip club on a Saturday night, it would be loaded with men spending money versus being totally empty. Women are the ultimate luxury good.
For every GDP and unemployment number you pull out of your ass, I can show you consumer credit card debt, interest payments on federal debt, and the exploding amount of federal debt. You seem to be missing the part where having a great life while maxing out your credit cards is not going to end well.
In 1999/2000, the men were six deep in line trying to get dances from the hottest dancers in strip clubs and the talk was complete elimination of the debt. To compare those days to these is a fucking joke. If you are Tooms, it was all Clinton and the Republicans in Congress had nothing to do with those boom times.
But as usual, I see both points of view while you are the one with your head firmly up your ass.
You seem to not know anyone under the age of 35 Spidy. I guess you like your MILFs. Well, here is another video where there is discussion of the benefits of young people continue to live with their parents: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31B6wzlzcOc[/URL].
Ah yes, that is such a sign of a strong economy.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2893106]Other part that was crazy with Putin interview is Putin confirmed something everyone who follows the Ukraine War knew: Ukraine and Russia had a peace deal and Boris Johnson destroyed it. My guess is he did so after being told to by Biden, but that is not fact.
So Putin does the interview, confirms this already known fact, but now that this fact is much more widely known, and Bojo fucking loses it. [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/boris-johnson-has-meltdown-after-being-exposed-sabotaging-ukraine-peace-deal[/URL].
In his video, this asshole Bojo does not even deny it.
Xpartan, you try to make this a red-blue conservative-liberal issue but it is not. It is neocon, pro military industrial complex people versus everyone else. Nikki Haley would be the same type of war monger Biden is.[/QUOTE]No I don't. I'm seeing a lot of Republicans backing Ukraine's heroic war effort against the Russian aggression. Probably not as much because of heroism, but because they rightly see that this is a fight the whole civilized world against modern-day barbarians.
No Elvis. The problem is you. You, trumpers, right-wingers, unscrupulous demagogues who're willing to embrace war criminals and mass murderers in a fight against your own democracy.
As for that Boris Johnson hot bullshit, I've already answered in the Ukraine thread.
-
Crickets?
I thought by now at least one of the supposedly "pro democracy, pro America" posters here like Elvis, MDS1 and such would have expressed their outrage that one of the frontrunner candidates for POTUS from the two major political parties just recently proudly announced that, should he win the election, he fully intends to violate the USA Constitution, violate his Oath of Office, break the law and encourage his Puppet Master Putin to invade any NATO member country and "do whatever the hell" he wants.
Which, of course, is not only a violation of the USA Constitution, a violation of the Oath of Office and a crime, but it would also be one of the most disastrous economic and national security moves ever made by any leader of any country in history.
Leading to WWIII (uh, not WWII)? Very, very likely.
Now, I know it is entirely possible that those Wingers have not even heard this bit of news. After all, it happened way last Saturday and it is entirely probable the "news" sources they pay any attention to have been too busy examining just why Joe Biden said "Mexico" in his comments about an international border issue when he meant to say "Egypt".
Still, I have managed to hear, see, read and know ALL about it even though I live far away from the USA, the place where Joe Biden lives and even the neighborhood where that particular America-hating candidate who made that campaign promise lives.
A miracle, you say? Not really. It turns out just about anyone in the world can know just about everything there is to know about issues that occur more than easy walking distance from where they reside. Really. I mean even from one USA city to another USA city. And within minutes too!
Well, actually, that has been possible pretty much ever since one dude spoke into a hand piece and said. "Mr. Watson, come here. I want to see you" and that Watson guy wasn't even in the same room!
Really. It was in all the papers.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2893575]I thought by now at least one of the supposedly "pro democracy, pro America" posters here like Elvis, MDS1 and such would have expressed their outrage that one of the frontrunner candidates for POTUS from the two major political parties just recently proudly announced that, should he win the election, he fully intends to violate the USA Constitution, violate his Oath of Office, break the law and encourage his Puppet Master Putin to invade any NATO member country and "do whatever the hell" he wants.
Which, of course, is not only a violation of the USA Constitution, a violation of the Oath of Office and a crime, but it would also be one of the most disastrous economic and national security moves ever made by any leader of any country in history.
Leading to WWIII (uh, not WWII)? Very, very likely.
Now, I know it is entirely possible that those Wingers have not even heard this bit of news. After all, it happened way last Saturday and it is entirely probable the "news" sources they pay any attention to have been too busy examining just why Joe Biden said "Mexico" in his comments about an international border issue when he meant to say "Egypt"..[/QUOTE]Here is your answer.
[B]Trumps threat to NATO allies draws little condemnation from GOP, reflecting his grip on the party[/B]
It's easy. He remarked once that his disciples wouldn't care if he shot someone on Times Square (and he was right). So why would they flinch now? Their lord and savior simply can't do wrong.
Politicians are another matter. To them it's about survival, nothing more.
[QUOTE]WASHINGTON (AP) Donald Trumps claim that he once told a NATO ally that he would encourage Russia to do whatever the hell they want to delinquent members of the group sent shockwaves through Europe over the weekend. But in Washington, most Republicans downplayed or defended remarks that seemed to invite Russian aggression.[/QUOTE][URL]https://apnews.com/article/trump-nato-presidential-election-congress-republicans-20e902788e8701999ce0424f73d478cc[/URL]
-
Biden's GREAT ECONOMY...as "Trumpian" economics ties to take credit
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2893468]What does Trump have to do with any of this? Oh right. You cannot post anything without blaming him for all the world's ills. Classic TDS.[/QUOTE]
(...kkkk!) Yeah...Dude, me using, "Trumpian" as an adjective to describe your gulag economics, should have told you all you need to know. But since you're the one bringing up [b]Trump, for the world's ills,[/b] you maybe on to something? Stick with it, I'd love to hear more!
Truth be told, though, there are an awful lot right-wing Trump copycats, crawled out from under their rocks, as of late. Or is this just the latest crop of right-wing fascist dictators, in this era of history, to come out and inflict their brand of benevolence on the world?
Elvis 2008, when your "wanna be dictator", Trump, interjects himself, into the economic discussion, and tries to take credit for President Joe Biden's GREAT ECONOMY, perhaps you it's you suffering from TDS?
But not to worry, Elvis 2008, as President Joe Biden, has reduced the cost of SENIOR health care prescription drugs for YOU and millions of other senior Americans. In addition to a GREAT ECONOMY, Biden has improved access and reduced costs to ACA for millions of Americas, like yourself who maybe suffering from TDS? So fear not!
Biden's Affordable Care Act (ACA) Accomplishments:
• A record number 20 Million join ACA. 8 Million Americas have signed up for ACA during the Biden's term, the largest expansion of healthcare ever.
• Biden's Continued Investment in ACA, has made healthcare really affordable and lowered costs
• Under Biden, 80% (or 4/5) Americans can get healthcare insurance for as little as $10/month
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2893468]Have you ever been to a country where there is zero demand for the currency? [b][u]It is not pretty.[/u][/b][/QUOTE]
Even if I have, they still took US dollars. So what's your point? Are you suggesting that the USA, under "Trumpian" economics is going have zero demand for its currency? If so, you maybe right!
BTW, have you ever been to a country that had zero demand for it's currency, where the country has been bombed to bits, become a virtual war zone and has very little in the way of an actual economy? [i][b]It is not pretty![/b][/i]
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2893468]John Oliver had a hilarious video on Chuck E Cheese here. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3v6y2pY1pZ0.[/URL] he was going to do it on home owners associations and then changed his mind saying, "If you are under 35, you will never, ever, ever be able to afford house. " which is totally true.
So yeah, if you are in the stock market or own a house, then fuck yeah, Biden has been great. The rich have gotten richer. If not, you are getting your ass kicked. Housing prices are up 45% since Biden took office.
The economy is okay. It is not great. If it were great, and I went to a popular strip club on a Saturday night, it would be loaded with men spending money versus being totally empty. Women are the ultimate luxury good.
For every GDP and unemployment number you pull out of your ass, I can show you consumer credit card debt, interest payments on federal debt, and the exploding amount of federal debt. You seem to be missing the part where having a great life while maxing out your credit cards is not going to end well.
In 1999/2000, the men were six deep in line trying to get dances from the hottest dancers in strip clubs and the talk was complete elimination of the debt. To compare those days to these is a fucking joke. If you are Tooms, it was all Clinton and the Republicans in Congress had nothing to do with those boom times.
But as usual, I see both points of view while you are the one with your head firmly up your ass.
You seem to not know anyone under the age of 35 Spidy. I guess you like your MILFs. Well, here is another video where there is discussion of the benefits of young people continue to live with their parents: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31B6wzlzcOc[/URL].
Ah yes, that is such a sign of a strong economy.[/QUOTE]
Okay, Elvis 2008...those stories, I must say, were a lovely regalement of assortment of tales from your "Trumpian" economic crypt. Yes very entertaining, while yet, [b]not one thing[/b] mentioned w/r to anything Repubs have done to help, said Americans.
Careful now, in addition to [b]TDS,[/b] YOU may also suffer from [b]CRS![/b] (...kkkk! aka. "Chip Roy Syndrome")
Elvis 2008, just reminder, to tell those under 35 year of age that you frequently run into (as I often do), that as soon as, the Repubs get-out-the-way and stop impeding their economic success, with things like book-bans, abortion bans, student forgiveness loans and tax breaks for rich wealthy billionaires/corporate donors and bi-partisan bills that address and prevent corporate rental/housing greed from unfairly buying up huge chunks of family housing and then raising rent (and home ownership) to absurd levels of inequality for Americans seeking home ownership...the better off they'll be.
Yes, [b]despite[/b] the efforts of Repubs to derail, thwart and impede [i](and often [u]try to take credit[/u] for)[/i], the good and sometimes better than good fortunes of Americans, it is still yet a strong, vibrant and resilient Biden economy.
[b]But I shudder to imagine[/b], given those very same tales of supposed "Biden economic woes" you present, would have be like under a Repub "Trumpian" 2020 administration. Naturally Americas would be in:[LIST] [b][Quote courtesy of EihTooms][/b] [i]"One of those Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions, Massive Repub Jobs Destruction and Mysterious, Mystical Great Repub 'Once in a Hundred Years' Repeatedly Wild Coincidence Repub Disasters along with the inevitable and unavoidable Recovery Inflation."[/i][/LIST]So to use your own words, w/r to if we were currently in a Repub lead economy, [i][b]"It is not pretty!"[/b][/i] nor [i][b]"Would it be pretty!"[/b][/i]
-
LISTEN carefully now, padawan Jedi...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2893468]Spidy, do you live in the USA? Or are you like Tooms lecturing us about how things are in the USA from thousands of miles away? [/QUOTE]
Elvis 2008,
In a Trumpian world, laced with right-wing toxicity, doxxing, threats of terror, harm and violence, forgive me if I answer with caution and tell you to...[b]assume and image whatever[/b] pleases that right-winger "Trumpian" heart of yours.
But [b]hey Elvis 2008[/b], what I can tell you and I'll let you in on a little secret (and impart a little Jedi wisdom, from what someone once told me) ...it is THIS:[LIST][i]"If you're [U]patient[/u] enough, [u]quiet[/u] enough, and really, really, really LISTEN carefully enough!...[b]people will often tell you who they are, [u]without you asking![/u]"[/b][/i][/LIST]
Wait...[b]just be patient[/b], my "Trumpian" conservative padawan! (...kkkk!)
-
Trump and his fellow classic Repubs love Open Borders everywhere in the world
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2893735]Here is your answer.
[B]Trumps threat to NATO allies draws little condemnation from GOP, reflecting his grip on the party[/B]
It's easy. He remarked once that his disciples wouldn't care if he shot someone on Times Square (and he was right). So why would they flinch now? Their lord and savior simply can't do wrong.
Politicians are another matter. To them it's about survival, nothing more.
[URL]https://apnews.com/article/trump-nato-presidential-election-congress-republicans-20e902788e8701999ce0424f73d478cc[/URL][/QUOTE]Trump, ChristoFascist Mike and their fellow classic Repubs have not only finally proven to the people of America that they are 100% in favor of Open Borders for America as witnessed by their killing the strictest, most "conservative", bi-partisan Immigration Reform bill ever handed to them, but they are also proving to the world they are 100% in favor of ENCOURAGING lawless aggressors to cross borders everywhere on the planet to "do whatever the hell they want"!
And don't think for one minute Trump's public message to Vladimir Putin regarding invading any NATO member country he damn well pleases with his full and dutiful consent does not include the NATO country member known at least up to now as The United States of America.
Trump's hatred for America, democracy, national sovereignty and border security at home and abroad knows no bounds and has been revealed for all the world to see.
Dems continue to way over perform their poll numbers vs Repubs and win elections, now even when classic phony Repub outrage issues such as Immigration and Border Control are the top concerns of the electorate. And understandably so.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2893743](...kkkk!)
Biden's Affordable Care Act (ACA) Accomplishments:
A record number 20 Million join ACA. 8 Million Americas have signed up for ACA during the Biden's term, the largest expansion of healthcare ever.
Biden's Continued Investment in ACA, has made healthcare really affordable and lowered costs
Under Biden, 80% (or 4/5) Americans can get healthcare insurance for as little as $10/month [/QUOTE]While I agree with your praises of Biden's economic achievements, healthcare is not one of them.
Yes, I can see claims of $10 coverage for 80% Americans, but I'll believe it when I see it in practice. No one who makes any kind of money beyond mere peanuts would be eligible for this kind of premiums. The policy I pay for my family members costs $ hundreds a month and has a high deductible, copayments and co-insurance. In addition, the credits for buying a policy come out of your tax deductions anyway. I'm not saying ACA isn't helpful at all, but the system is still broken and will remain broken until we join the rest of the civilized world and provide public healthcare for everyone.
-
Why Spin?
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2893482]No I don't. I'm seeing a lot of Republicans backing Ukraine's heroic war effort against the Russian aggression. Probably not as much because of heroism, but because they rightly see that this is a fight the whole civilized world against modern-day barbarians.
No Elvis. The problem is you. You, trumpers, right-wingers, unscrupulous demagogues who're willing to embrace war criminals and mass murderers in a fight against your own democracy.
As for that Boris Johnson hot bullshit, I've already answered in the Ukraine thread.[/QUOTE]I just don't get why this is so hard for MAGA to understand and comprehend.
Russia, for whatever reasons it may have, attacked a sovereign country UNPROVOKED. And that is WRONG.
Why even spin the situation or give "reasonings" for Russia?
Today, I heard Tommy Tuberville on a radio show saying that Russia attacked Ukraine because US put weapons in countries near Russia.
1st. Last I check, US does not put weapons in any countries without their permission (more like invitations because they fear Russia would do the same to them as Ukraine). That's what sovereignty of a country is. They do whatever the hell they want within their borders without breaking any laws to protect their land. Example: North and South Korea have troops within shouting distance, and yet no body invaded the other guy for 50+ years.
2nd. Why is a US Senator blaming his country for Russia attacking Ukraine, UNPROVOKED? And since he part of the government, is he blaming himself?
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2893860]I just don't get why this is so hard for MAGA to understand and comprehend.[/QUOTE]Because they don't want to understand. That would hurt for they put all their eggs into Trump's basket. There're nothing left.
Now why Trump is so enthusiastic about sucking a third-rate dictator's cock, I might have an idea.
[B]https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/12/21/how-russian-money-helped-save-trumps-business[/B]
[B]Putin is cashing in on his enormous investment in Trump[/B]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pbYSp0ROmo[/URL]
"Russiagate", my ass!
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2893860]I just don't get why this is so hard for MAGA to understand and comprehend.
Russia, for whatever reasons it may have, attacked a sovereign country UNPROVOKED. And that is WRONG.
Why even spin the situation or give "reasonings" for Russia?[/QUOTE]The sovereign nation of Ukraine was part of the old USSR and contingent on being a sovereign nation was an agreement between Russia and the West that Ukraine not possess nuclear weapons. Japan made provisions with the USA after surrendering in WW 2. If Japan violated those agreements, the USA would be justified in going to war with Japan.
[URL]https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/russia/tucker-interview-with-putin/[/URL]
The day before Putin's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, as the biased press loves to call it, Zelensky stood up and announced he would seek to rearm Ukraine with nuclear weapons pointed at Russia. Putin mentioned in a speech to the people on February 23rd that night that Ukraine announced it would rearm with nuclear weapons as one of the reasons to justify entering the Donbas.
Ukraine shut off water to Crimea, launched bombers into the Dombass, coddled neonazis, and none other than Kamala Harris spoke of Ukraine joining NATO. Then we hear of all these weird biolabs in Ukraine getting funded by the Pentagon and Victoria Nuland worrying they might fall into Russian hands, [URL]https://greenwald.substack.com/p/victoria-nuland-ukraine-has-biological[/URL].
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2893860]That's what sovereignty of a country is. They do whatever the hell they want within their borders without breaking any laws to protect their land.[/QUOTE]So putting nuclear and potentially bioweapons on another nation's doorstep is not provocation unless it is the USA and Cuba. Then it is provocation, but when it is Ukraine and Russia, it is not. Got it. Yeah, I cannot believe why MAGA idiots could be so dumb as to be confused by that.
-
Fux Trump TV and GOP's impeccable Biden accuser is arrested for lying to the FBI
It appears the central witness in Trump Attorney General Sean Hannity and ChristoFascist Mike's Impeachment case against President Hunter Biden has been busted for lying mercilessly about all the bits that so endeared him to Winger Repubs.
What will replace Impeaching President Hunter Biden as the Repub Getting Smaller and Smaller All The Time Pink Tinkle House as their top if not only priority?
Controlling the border? Nope. They are not interested.
Reducing crime? Nope. Biden has already done that.
Reducing Inflation? Nope. Biden has already done that.
Recover the economy from the most recent Great Repub Crash and Jobs Destruction? Nope. Biden has already done that.
Fund international resistance against terrorism and authoritarian dictatorship aggression for pennies on the dollar? Nope. Not interested.
Anything?
Guess they'll have to continue to live up to their well earned and well deserved Do Nothing Repub reputation.
[B]Special counsel charges FBI informant with lying to the bureau about Hunter and Joe Biden.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/15/special-counsel-charges-fbi-informant-with-lying-to-the-bureau-about-hunter-and-joe-biden.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Washington An FBI confidential human source has been indicted on two counts of allegedly feeding the bureau false information about President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden during the 2020 presidential campaign.
Alexander Smirnov, 43, who disliked President Joe Biden, was arrested in Las Vegas after returning from a trip overseas, according to the Justice Department. The case grew out of the special counsel investigation being led by David Weiss, who is also leading the case against Hunter Biden. Weiss had been appointed by former President Donald Trump as the top federal prosecutor in Delaware.
The 37-page indictment alleges that Smirnov had been an informant for the FBI since 2010 and "provided false derogatory information to the FBI" about both Bidens after Joe Biden became a candidate for president in 2020.
Smirnov allegedly told the FBI falsely that officials with Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company that Hunter Biden worked for, had told him they hired Hunter Biden because he would "protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems. " Smirnov allegedly told the FBI again, falsely that Burisma officials had told him they paid Hunter Biden and Joe Biden $5 million and that it would take investigators 10 years to find the illicit payments to Joe Biden.[/QUOTE]
-
The Arc of Health Care...
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2893853] While I agree with your praises of Biden's economic achievements, healthcare is not one of them. [/QUOTE]
Perhaps not an actual specific "economic" achievement per se, I don't need to tell you to imagine the horrendous "economic" costs of medical health care, when it's out of pocket for Americans, caught without coverage.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2893853] Yes, I can see claims of $10 coverage for 80% Americans, but I'll believe it when I see it in practice. No one who makes any kind of money beyond mere peanuts would be eligible for this kind of premiums. The policy I pay for my family members costs $ hundreds a month and has a high deductible, copayments and co-insurance. In addition, the credits for buying a policy come out of your tax deductions anyway. [b]I'm not saying ACA isn't helpful at all, but the system is still broken and will remain broken until we join the rest of the civilized world and provide public healthcare for everyone.[/b][/QUOTE]
Agreed! Yes, I too also think, more work needs to be done to make ACA more affordable for middle to high income families. But broadly speaking, ACA has made health care more available and more inclusive for more Americans than ever, in history.
Too steal and plagiarize an MLK/Obama quote:[LIST][i]"The arc of truly affordable heath care for ALL Americans maybe (Repub obstructed unnecessarily) long, but I'm hopeful it bends towards [b]"universal health care"[/b] or [b]"Medicare for all."[/b][/i][/LIST][LIST]Just like much of the rest of the civilized world, as you've nicely stated.[/LIST]
-
To see a classic Putin apologist -- look no further.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2893978]The day before Putin's unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, [b]as the biased press loves to call it[/b], Zelensky stood up and announced he would seek to rearm Ukraine with nuclear weapons pointed at Russia. Putin mentioned in a speech to the people on February 23rd that night that Ukraine announced it would rearm with nuclear weapons as one of the reasons to justify entering the Donbas.
[b]Lie #1: Russia attacked Ukraine because Ukraine threatened Russia with nuclear rearmament.[/b][/QUOTE]Here is the full Zelensky's speech on Feb 23, one day before the invasion. Where is the bit about "nuclear rearmament"?
[URL]https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/02/23/zelenskys-desperate-plea-for-peace[/URL]
Did you mean another speech? Or did you just pull this shit out of your ass? Link please.
Even if this speech had happened, whatever Zelensky might've said on Feb 23, couldn't have meant anything. The Russian troops had already been positioned for the invasion. The USA Intelligence knew that the invasion was imminent months before it happened. This claim of yours is insane.
[QUOTE][b]Lie #2: Ukraine's hostility against the Crimea and Donbass separatists provoked Putin. shut off water to Crimea, launched bombers into the Dombass, coddled neonazis, and none other than Kamala Harris spoke of Ukraine joining NATO. [/b][/QUOTE]Repeat after me: Crimea and Donbass belong to Ukraine. Do you understand this. Ukraine. Mexico is not allowed to be "provoked" into war if some shit happens in Texas. Germany is not allowed to be provoked into war if some shit happens in Czechia. What the hell is wrong with you?
[QUOTE][b]Lie 3: Then we hear of all these weird biolabs in Ukraine getting funded by the Pentagon and Victoria Nuland worrying they might fall into Russian hands, [URL]https://greenwald.substack.com/p/victoria-nuland-ukraine-has-biological[/URL].[/b][/QUOTE]Yeah, then you hear, don't you?
How the false Russian biolab story came to circulate among the USA Far right.
[URL]https://www.npr.org/2022/03/25/1087910880/biological-weapons-far-right-russia-ukraine[/URL]
Theory About USA -Funded Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine Is Unfounded.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/11/us/politics/us-bioweapons-ukraine-misinformation.html[/URL]
Finally:
[QUOTE]Senator Rubio Questions Undersecretary Nuland Over Biolabs in Ukraine
During her testimony in front of the Senate Foreign Relations committee about the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland answers a question from Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) about whether or not Ukraine has chemical or biological weapons. She replies, "Ukraine has biological research facilities, which, in fact, we are now quite concerned...Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of." [b]She then refutes allegations from Russia that Ukrainians are plotting to use biological weapons, and says that if such an attack happens in Ukraine, "there is no doubt in my mind" it would be caused by Russian forces.[/b] [/QUOTE][URL]https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5005520/senator-rubio-questions-undersecretary-nuland-biolabs-ukraine[/URL]
[B][QUOTE]Lie #4 = Lies 1-3 combined: So putting nuclear and potentially bioweapons on another nation's doorstep is not provocation unless it is the USA and Cuba. Then it is provocation, but when it is Ukraine and Russia, it is not. Got it. [/B][ / QUOTE]Do you get it? You sure? Well, I'm glad.
[B][QUOTE]Truth #1: Yeah, I cannot believe why MAGA idiots could be so dumb as to be confused by that.[/B][/QUOTE]Me neither. Unfortunately, this is a reality we're all forced to live in.
-
That was a Repub and Third Party decision
[QUOTE=Spidy;2894208]Perhaps not an actual specific "economic" achievement per se, I don't need to tell you to imagine the horrendous "economic" costs of medical health care, when it's out of pocket for Americans, caught without coverage.
Agreed! Yes, I too also think, more work needs to be done to make ACA more affordable for middle to high income families. But broadly speaking, ACA has made health care more available and more inclusive for more Americans than ever, in history.
Too steal and plagiarize an MLK/Obama quote:[LIST][i]"The arc of truly affordable heath care for ALL Americans maybe (Repub obstructed unnecessarily) long, but I'm hopeful it bends towards [b]"universal health care"[/b] or [b]"Medicare for all."[/b][/i][/LIST][LIST]Just like much of the rest of the civilized world, as you've nicely stated.[/LIST][/QUOTE]Joe Lieberman, the same Independent / Third Party / No Labels screw-up who is working mightily to help Donald Trump retake the White House so he can produce another 4-year shitstorm of historic crap Repub Economic and National Security policies and stewardship results, along with virtually every admitted Repub in Congress was the reason the Affordable Care Act healthcare reform wasn't many, many times better and cheaper than it is.
[B]The New Republic: It Was Lieberman All Along.
Oct. 28, 2009[/B]
[URL]https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=114233563[/URL]
The eternal lesson being, if you want a better Economy, better National Security, better Border Control, Lower Inflation, more and better jobs created, higher wages, more affordable and better Healthcare, lower debt and deficits, greater Stock Market gains and any other significant improvements in the lives of Americans, you do not, repeat, do not vote for Repubs, Third Party candidates or refuse to vote at all. No, you vote Democrat all the way down the ballot every time, no exceptions. And do your best to convince everyone you know to do the same.
America must have a Dem in the White House, at least 235 Dems in the House and at least 5 more Dems than required to constitute a Super Majority in the Senate if the country is going to deliver great things for our taxpayer dollar. It is as simple as that. Even 1 decisive non Dem in the House or Senate and most definitely any Repub in the White House is enough to put the entire country and much of the rest of the world in serious danger.
I wish it weren't so. But the data and evidence supporting that conclusion is overwhelming and inarguable now.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2894216]Here is the full Zelensky's speech on Feb 23, one day before the invasion. Where is the bit about "nuclear rearmament"?[/QUOTE]I posted the link.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2894216]Even if this speech had happened, whatever Zelensky might've said on Feb 23, couldn't have meant anything. The Russian troops had already been positioned for the invasion. This claim of yours is insane.[/QUOTE]It is not MY claim, dummy. Russia could have pulled back if they had assurances from Biden there were going to be no nukes in Ukraine and no NATO expansion. Biden told Putin to kick rocks.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2894216]How the false Russian biolab story came to circulate among the USA Far right.
[URL]https://www.npr.org/2022/03/25/1087910880/biological-weapons-far-right-russia-ukraine[/URL]
Theory About USA -Funded Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine Is Unfounded.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/11/us/politics/us-bioweapons-ukraine-misinformation.html[/URL][/QUOTE]Hey, where did the whole biolabs thing come up? It was from one of your neocon Jewish friends, Victoria Nuland. You know the lady who chose the leader of the "sovereign nation of Ukraine. Cough, cough. The one who said, "Fuck the EU. " Oh my bad, you are so dumb you thought I made that up.
[URL]https://greenwald.substack.com/p/victoria-nuland-ukraine-has-biological[/URL]
The Russian Foreign Ministry asserted that "Russia obtained documents proving that Ukrainian biological laboratories located near Russian borders worked on development of components of biological weapons. ".
So that is easy to swat down. Just say it is not true. Well, it turns out that is not what happened: Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), hoping to debunk growing claims that there are chemical weapons labs in Ukraine, smugly asked Nuland: "Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?
Rubio undoubtedly expected a flat denial by Nuland, thus providing further "proof" that such speculation is dastardly Fake News emanating from the Kremlin, the CCP and QAnon. Instead, Nuland did something completely uncharacteristic for her, for neocons, and for senior USA Foreign policy officials: for some reason, she told a version of the truth.
She acknowledged: "uh, Ukraine has, uh, biological research facilities."
So Russia makes a claim and Nuland admits it is true. No one knows exactly what those facilities were working on including you. But when NPR and the NYT pretend to know, and they spew out MAGA, QAnon, Russian conspiracy to confuse people like you, you lap it up like a puppy.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2894216]Repeat after me: Crimea and Donbass belong to Ukraine. Do you understand this. Ukraine. Mexico is not allowed to be "provoked" into war if some shit happens in Texas. What the hell is wrong with you?[/QUOTE]LOL. Man, you really do not know your history. Cuba had nukes and the USA was going to go to war with Cuba and Russia to get them out, so this whole a country can do whatever it wants within its borders is sheer bullshit. Russia can look at the Cuban missile crisis to justify their invasion.
Then there is Mexico: The Mexican American War was an invasion of Mexico by the United States Army from 1846 to 1848. It followed the 1845 American annexation of Texas, which Mexico still considered its territory because Mexico refused to recognize the Treaties of Velasco its generals signed.
The USA Army, under Major General Winfield Scott, invaded the Mexican heartland and captured the capital, Mexico City, in September 1847. The war was successfully concluded with the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. It ended the war, and Mexico recognized the cession of present-day Texas, California, Nevada, and Utah as well as parts of present-day Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming. Mexico relinquished its claims on Texas and accepted the Rio Grande as its northern border with the United States, a loss of 55% of its territory.
Hey, Xpartan, maybe you just learned something.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2894216]Unfortunately, this is a reality we're all forced to live in.[/QUOTE]You do not live in reality.
Think I am kidding? How many Covid boosters have you gotten lately? You have not gotten any. You are just too much of a coward to admit it.
And can you say this? Russiagate was a total fraud. The fact that you cannot say Russiagate was a fraud means you believe what you want and not the truth. You would not know the truth if it bit you in the ass.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2894167]It appears the central witness in Trump Attorney General Sean Hannity and ChristoFascist Mike's Impeachment case against President Hunter Biden has been busted for lying mercilessly about all the bits that so endeared him to Winger Repubs.[/QUOTE]Some Dem is lapping up an FBI accusation as proof of guilt versus the FBI playing politics. What else is new? You mean the same FBI that sat on Hunter Biden's laptop during the 2020 election? That FBI?
David Weiss is charging Smirnov with lying to the FBI about the details he's presented in the Hunter Biden probe. Smirnov faces up to 25 years in prison.
Remember, this is the same David Weiss who said the IRS whistleblowers were lying, even though it was proven that they were telling the truth, and he offered Hunter that sweetheart plea deal before the Judge rejected it.
Did you guys know that Alexander Smirnov is only being charged with the DOJ catch all: "Making a false statement" 18 USC 1001, and "Creating a false and fictitious record" 18 USC 1519. The old "process crimes" attack. Classic Biden.
Ok. So where are all the indictments for everyone who gave the FBI false information about the Russian collusion charges against Trump?
Russiagate was the FBI telling countless lies about Trump being in bed with Putin. They lied to the FISA court. They lied in their documents, they changed testimony and now the FBI is outraged, outraged about someone lying? LOL.
Repeat after me, Tooms. Russiagate was the FBI lying to everyone in America about Trump. Can you say that? Sure you can.
So why the fuck should any of us care about the FBI and lying?
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2894233]No, you vote Democrat all the way down the ballot every time, no exceptions. And do your best to convince everyone you know to do the same.[/QUOTE]Isn't this what Republicans do?
Would you vote for Menendez?
One of my Rep friends who hates Trump's guts told me he'd vote for him anyway. I asked him why, and he said it's either him or Biden. I asked him half-jokingly how he'd be able to live with himself, and he said amazingly similar things to what you just did. That once you make a choice you have to stick with this choice even when it stinks and makes you cringe.
The danger of your approach is that when merit flies out of the window, it only encourages bad behavior. When politicians of any creed know they are politically invincible, there is nothing to prevent them from "menendezation".
-
MCU is coming to ISG
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2894216]Here is the full Zelensky's speech on Feb 23, one day before the invasion. [/QUOTE]Putin is on the same level as Thanos.
Feb 23, Zelensky made a speech.
Feb 24, Putin (Thanos) mobilized 100 K troops to the border using a new transporting power he got from riding a horse half naked somewhere in Russia. Easy peasy.
-
Joe Lieberman aka. ACA DINO.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2894233]Joe Lieberman, the same Independent / Third Party / No Labels screw-up who is working mightily to help Donald Trump retake the White House so he can produce another 4-year shitstorm of historic crap Repub Economic and National Security policies and stewardship results, along with virtually every admitted Repub in Congress was the reason the Affordable Care Act healthcare reform wasn't many, many times better and cheaper than it is.
[B]The New Republic: It Was Lieberman All Along.
Oct. 28, 2009[/B]
[URL]https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=114233563[/URL]
The eternal lesson being, if you want a better Economy, better National Security, better Border Control, Lower Inflation, more and better jobs created, higher wages, more affordable and better Healthcare, lower debt and deficits, greater Stock Market gains and any other significant improvements in the lives of Americans, you do not, repeat, do not vote for Repubs, Third Party candidates or refuse to vote at all. No, you vote Democrat all the way down the ballot every time, no exceptions. And do your best to convince everyone you know to do the same.
America must have a Dem in the White House, at least 235 Dems in the House and at least 5 more Dems than required to constitute a Super Majority in the Senate if the country is going to deliver great things for our taxpayer dollar. It is as simple as that. Even 1 decisive non Dem in the House or Senate and most definitely any Repub in the White House is enough to put the entire country and much of the rest of the world in serious danger.
I wish it weren't so. But the data and evidence supporting that conclusion is overwhelming and inarguable now.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, you're always going to get the odd one (or two) DINO types, saddle up along and side with the Repubs. Annoyingly unavoidable! Just looking to support their campaign contributions, big money and rich billionaires donors, by scuttling and watering down very good, meaningful and transformative bills/legislation, in the face and against the majority of Americans.
Just take the recent case of the DINOs, Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, w/r to the initial, bigger $4.5 trillion IRA.
[QUOTE=NPR][B]The New Republic: It Was Lieberman All Along. Oct. 28, 2009[/B] ... I think Lieberman is the one to watch. My guess is that ultimately he'll vote for reform, but he'll do so because the Democrats will scale back their plan and win over Olympia Snowe, making Lieberman's opposition academic. Lieberman won't join a futile filibuster, [b]but if he has the chance to stick in the knife and kill health care reform, I think he'd probably jump at the chance.[/b]
[URL]https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=114233563[/URL][/QUOTE]
Well from Lieberman's Wiki post, it looks like he got the chance to[b] "stick in the knife"[/b] and vote-down the [i]"public health insurance option",[/i] part of the ACA.
Thanks, it's always good to put a face/name to those "filibuster" impeding progress transgressors, even if it's a DINO.
-
He was not a Democrat anymore
[QUOTE=Spidy;2894418]Yeah, you're always going to get the odd one (or two) DINO types, saddle up along and side with the Repubs. Annoyingly unavoidable! Just looking to support their campaign contributions, big money and rich billionaires donors, by scuttling and watering down very good, meaningful and transformative bills/legislation, in the face and against the majority of Americans.
Just take the recent case of the DINOs, Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, w/r to the initial, bigger $4.5 trillion IRA..[/QUOTE]Bear in mind, Lieberman had been booted from the Democratic Party by then. He was no longer a "Democrat" In Name Only or in any other way.
By then he was passing himself off as an Independent, the kind of pol meant to attract votes from pro Repub "Bothsiders" who can't admit openly or to themselves that they want Repubs to win elections so they can produce horrific results in office but that is typically the end result of their vote anyway.
The same thing he is doing with his No Labels movement.
-
Please provide a link to all those FBI lies
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2894326]Some Dem is lapping up an FBI accusation as proof of guilt versus the FBI playing politics. What else is new? You mean the same FBI that sat on Hunter Biden's laptop during the 2020 election? That FBI?
David Weiss is charging Smirnov with lying to the FBI about the details he's presented in the Hunter Biden probe. Smirnov faces up to 25 years in prison.
Remember, this is the same David Weiss who said the IRS whistleblowers were lying, even though it was proven that they were telling the truth, and he offered Hunter that sweetheart plea deal before the Judge rejected it.
Did you guys know that Alexander Smirnov is only being charged with the DOJ catch all: "Making a false statement" 18 USC 1001, and "Creating a false and fictitious record" 18 USC 1519. The old "process crimes" attack. Classic Biden.[/QUOTE]What lies and which witnesses were those?
This is what Trump's own Department of Justice found regarding the FBI's necessary and totally justifiable investigation of Trump, Camp Trump and their extraordinarily deep and intense collusion with Russia all through the election:
[B]FBI was justified in probing Trump-Russia, fed watchdog says.
Dec. 9, 2019[/B]
[URL]https://apnews.com/fbi-was-justified-in-probing-trump-russia-fed-watchdog-says-a734c40d142c8950f57ad4c8f8af565c[/URL]
[QUOTE]WASHINGTON (AP) The FBI was justified in opening its investigation into ties between the Trump presidential campaign and Russia and did not act with political bias, the Justice Departments internal watchdog declared Monday, undercutting President Donald Trumps repeated claims that he has been the target of a witch hunt.
The long-awaited report rejected theories and criticism spread by Trump and his supporters, though it also found serious performance failures up the bureaus chain of command that Republicans are citing as evidence that Trump was targeted by an unfair investigation.
The affirmation of the investigations legitimacy, balanced by criticism of the way it was conducted ensured that partisan battles would persist over one of the most politically sensitive investigations in FBI history. Another review of the origins of the probe continues, and the prosecutor picked by Attorney General William Barr to lead that effort hinted Monday hell take a harder view of the FBIs actions.[/QUOTE]There was only evidence against the FBI of making mistakes on the forms required to initiate their necessary and justifiable investigation and too little evidence of wrongdoing to charge whatever "lying" witnesses you are referring to.
"Russia, if you're listening", neither your top American political stooge Donald Trump nor your and MAGA's top useful idiot in the media Tucker Carlson has yet uttered one word of criticism for your Murdering your political enemies. Actually, your and MAGA's top useful idiot in the media has lovingly defended and supported it.
-
Funny story
"Some Dem is lapping up an FBI accusation as proof of guilt versus the FBI playing politics. What else is new? You mean the same FBI that sat on Hunter Biden's laptop during the 2020 election? That FBI?
David Weiss is charging Smirnov with lying to the FBI about the details he's presented in the Hunter Biden probe. Smirnov faces up to 25 years in prison.
Remember, this is the same David Weiss who said the IRS whistleblowers were lying, even though it was proven that they were telling the truth, and he offered Hunter that sweetheart plea deal before the Judge rejected it.
Did you guys know that Alexander Smirnov is only being charged with the DOJ catch all: "Making a false statement" 18 USC 1001, and "Creating a false and fictitious record" 18 USC 1519. The old "process crimes" attack. Classic Biden.
Ok. So where are all the indictments for everyone who gave the FBI false information about the Russian collusion charges against Trump?
Russiagate was the FBI telling countless lies about Trump being in bed with Putin. They lied to the FISA court. They lied in their documents, they changed testimony and now the FBI is outraged, outraged about someone lying? LOL.
Repeat after me, Tooms. Russiagate was the FBI lying to everyone in America about Trump. Can you say that? Sure you can.
So why the fuck should any of us care about the FBI and lying?
I got busted by a reverse sting mongering in a Sheraton hotel next to Ohare airport several years ago (circa 2015), guess who was running it, the FBI.
They asked my name of course I gave a bullshit name I said I found an ad online for a massage.
He was pissed yelling in my face he was a latino about 4 maybe 5 feet tall LOL with his FBI jacket on, yelling at me in my face, don't lie to me I'm the FBI.
I told him to blow me I want to speak to an atty and I sat down.
An hour or so later I was home.
Pro tip, leave wallet in the car.
Leave ignition key inside the gas cap door space.
Always say you just came for a massage and leave your wallet and keys behind.
They were towing other mongers cars.
I said my office was down the road and I took a taxi.
They didn't find any car FOB on me, they looked for one.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
-
Trump Pulls Another Classic Do Nothing Repub Stunt
Aww. Who told Repub Trump what had begun in 2014, expanded in 2022 and was already happening this year?
LOL. That is such a Classic Do Nothing Repub move for him to leave his booth at the KFC to run out in front of a passing parade that had already been marching down Broadway for years in hopes that at least a few ill-informed numbskulls might think he is the one who organized it.
[B]Germany's Scholz commits to spending 2% on defense 'in the 2020's, in the 2030's and beyond'.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/17/germanys-scholz-commits-to-spending-2percent-on-defense-over-next-10-years.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]MUNICH, Germany German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on Saturday reaffirmed Berlins commitment to spend 2% of the national gross domestic product (GDP) on defense, this year and over the longer term.
Germany will invest 2% of its GDP on defense in the 2020s, in the 2030s and beyond, Scholz told the Munich Security Conference.
Germany has this commitment in 2024 through regular and special budget outlays for the first time since the early 1990s, a defense ministry spokesperson said on Wednesday, according to Reuters.
....
Germany announced a new 100 billion euro ($107 billion) debt-financed fund for the Bundeswehr the German armed forces to beef up its national security in 2022, days after Russias full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Scholz at the time dubbed the move a Zeitenwende or watershed moment in Germanys modern history, which would allow the country to meet its long-held 2% defense spending goals.[/QUOTE][B]Why Donald Trumps boast that he got delinquent NATO allies to pay up is misleading[/B]
[URL]https://www.politifact.com/article/2024/feb/14/fact-check-trump-misleads-in-comments-that-he-got/[/URL]
[QUOTE]2014, following Russias illegal annexation of Crimea, North Atlantic Treaty Organization members agreed to spend 2% of their national gross domestic product on defense spending by 2024. Spending has increased since then. As of 2023, 11 countries met that goal.
Experts said Russia President Vladimir Putins actions in 2014 and 2022 in Ukraine spurred the defense spending increases.[/QUOTE]Oh brother. Cue the typically pro Repub Mainstream Media's spin that Trump's unconstitutional and criminal encouragement for any dictatorship to invade any country and "do whatever the hell they want" is responsible for a commitment and process that has been ongoing in Germany and many other NATO member countries for years! LOL.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2894437]
I got busted by a reverse sting mongering in a Sheraton hotel next to Ohare airport several years ago (circa 2015), guess who was running it, the FBI.
They asked my name of course I gave a bullshit name I said I found an ad online for a massage.
He was pissed yelling in my face he was a latino about 4 maybe 5 feet tall LOL with his FBI jacket on, yelling at me in my face, don't lie to me I'm the FBI.
I told him to blow me I want to speak to an atty and I sat down.
An hour or so later I was home.
Pro tip, leave wallet in the car.
Leave ignition key inside the gas cap door space.
Always say you just came for a massage and leave your wallet and keys behind.
They were towing other mongers cars.
I said my office was down the road and I took a taxi.
They didn't find any car FOB on me, they looked for one.
[/QUOTE]Prostitution is legal in the USA hence the Nevada brothels, but the Feds are hell bent on finding ways to make it illegal by using the bullshit accusations like money laundering, human trafficking ETC. It amazes me how many sex workers have said they know very few if any women who have been trafficked, but we see endless warnings about it.
The fucking FBI can lie all they want AKA Russiagate but you cannot. You handled it right. You do not say anything with those assholes because they will lie about what you said.
The only good news is the perverted Democratic Department of Justice may have gone too far. I am sure you have heard about the $364 billion Trump verdict as Dems tried like crazy to spin it that there were victims with it when they were none. It was such bullshit that the truckers of America have had enough.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/fk-around-find-out-truckers-warn-loads-nyc-will-be-rejected-starting-monday[/URL]
Truck drivers transport between 70% to 73% of all freight in the United States. Therefore, when truckers begin discussing plans on social media to boycott loads to progressive hellhole New York City, it's important to pay attention.
X user Chicago1 Ray, who appears to be a Midwest truck driver, shared a video late Friday night detailing that a number of truck drivers will begin denying loads to NYC on Monday.
"I don't know how far across the country this is. Or how many truckers are going start denying loads to NYC. But I'll tell you. You f**k around and find out," Chicago1 Ray said.
He continued: "We're tired of motherf**king leftist f**king with Trump. Okay. Motherfu**ers start to get tired of this shit. Our bosses aren't going to care if we deny loads. We'll go somewhere else. ".
"You know how hard it is to get in and out of NYC?" the trucker emphasized. I've been on the radio for over an hour and I've talked to at least (10) Truckers who are going to start refusing loads of Monday for (NYC) . I talked to (3) guys that I work with who texted the boss and told him no (NYC).
By Saturday morning, the video had amassed nearly 3 million views.
End of link. The truckers in Canada were the first ones who organized in mass against Covid and now we have to rely on their common sense again. I get their point. If you want to cost Trump $350 million on bullshit charges, we are going to hit you for $3 billion in damages you POS New Yorkers. I am done trying to convince these Dems of anything. They are so dumb they think this is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
What really gets me is the Covid crap we had to deal with. How many boosters you Dems get it? You still wearing masks and social distancing? Uh, why not? There is still Covid out there. You can still die from it just look at all the daily deaths in the world. Look up the numbers if you do not believe me.
It was only after states like Texas and Florida opened up that the gutless ones like California and New York saw the hits to their pocket books that they backed down. WAIT, YOU MEAN WE CANNOT JUST PRINT MONEY AND STAY HOME? That is what it is going to take with New York, getting hit in the pocket book.
I just hope the first thing Trump does when he gets in office is start over with law enforcement. Just destroy the corrupt FBI, CIA, and NSA and start fresh. They do way more harm than good.
-
Bad Parents Jailed, due to Problem Child...
Jennifer and James Crumbley were the [B]first parents[/B] in the US to be charged in a mass school shooting committed by their child, Ethan Crumbley who is serving a life sentence in prison.
[QUOTE=ABCNews][b]The Michigan school shooter's mother Jennifer Crumbley was convicted of manslaughter. Could the landmark ruling set a legal precedent?[/b]
[LIST] Why was the mother found responsible? Even though Jennifer Crumbley did not pull the trigger, she was held responsible for not safely securing the gun and ammunition at home, as well as failing to seek support for her son's mental health" ...[/LIST]
[URL]https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-07/legal-precedent-michigan-school-shooter-mother-jennifer-crumbley/103435710[/URL][/QUOTE]While I applaud the ruling, congress and the courts should go one better and repeal PLCAA, one of the dumbest / numbskull laws ever. PLCAA, was a Repub backed bill, pass by George "Dubya" Bush administration, back in 2005, to protect gun manufacturers from being sued, from those harmed by their products, can't sue the pants of them. No other manufacturers in industry has this kind of immunity.
Maybe if they didn't have such immunity, perhaps they'd put safer gun measures into their products, for fear of being sued, like everyone else?
-
Trump stole Millions from working people, small businesses, and taxpayers.
Of course, Bank Fraud is not a victimless crime.
Aside from the obvious theft of money and available resources from everyone who didn't commit Bank Fraud, unless bank fraudsters like Trump are fined huge monetary penalties far beyond whatever they might have gained from their bank fraud, there will be zero deterrence for him or anyone else from doing it again and again and again.
[B] Everything Trump said outside the doors of his NY fraud trial is wrong. Here's why, point-by-point.
Dec. 8, 2023[/B]
[URL]https://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-rages-outside-fraud-trial-factcheck-2023-12[/URL]
[QUOTE][b]The banks "love us" and there are "no victims"[/b]
In relying on Trump's exaggerations, Deutsche Bank lost out on $168 million in interest payments they would have otherwise charged him between 2014 and 2023, they allege.
"Trump's crimes are not victimless," James told reporters a year ago. "When the well-connected and powerful break the law to get more money than they are entitled to, it reduces resources available to working people, small businesses, and taxpayers."[/QUOTE]The Trump Crime Family got off easy. They all should have been banned FOR LIFE from doing business with banks that do business in New York.
Uh. If you steal a car, you still committed the crime of car theft and denied the owner and everyone else relying on that car access to it even if you return it 9 years later with a full tank of gas and a new coat of wax.
-
Yep
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2894435]"Russia, if you're listening", neither your top American political stooge Donald Trump nor your and MAGA's top useful idiot in the media Tucker Carlson has yet uttered one word of criticism for your Murdering your political enemies.[/QUOTE]This is the elephant in the room.
-
The truth was always prevail
"Prostitution is legal in the USA hence the Nevada brothels, but the Feds are hell bent on finding ways to make it illegal by using the bullshit accusations like money laundering, human trafficking ETC. It amazes me how many sex workers have said they know very few if any women who have been trafficked, but we see endless warnings about it.
The fucking FBI can lie all they want AKA Russiagate but you cannot. You handled it right. You do not say anything with those assholes because they will lie about what you said.
The only good news is the perverted Democratic Department of Justice may have gone too far. I am sure you have heard about the $364 billion Trump verdict as Dems tried like crazy to spin it that there were victims with it when they were none. It was such bullshit that the truckers of America have had enough.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/fk-around-find-out-truckers-warn-loads-nyc-will-be-rejected-starting-monday[/URL]
Truck drivers transport between 70% to 73% of all freight in the United States. Therefore, when truckers begin discussing plans on social media to boycott loads to progressive hellhole New York City, it's important to pay attention.
X user Chicago1 Ray, who appears to be a Midwest truck driver, shared a video late Friday night detailing that a number of truck drivers will begin denying loads to NYC on Monday.
"I don't know how far across the country this is. Or how many truckers are going start denying loads to NYC. But I'll tell you. You f**k around and find out," Chicago1 Ray said.
He continued: "We're tired of motherf**king leftist f**king with Trump. Okay. Motherfu**ers start to get tired of this shit. Our bosses aren't going to care if we deny loads. We'll go somewhere else. ".
"You know how hard it is to get in and out of NYC?" the trucker emphasized. I've been on the radio for over an hour and I've talked to at least (10) Truckers who are going to start refusing loads of Monday for (NYC) . I talked to (3) guys that I work with who texted the boss and told him no (NYC).
By Saturday morning, the video had amassed nearly 3 million views.
End of link. The truckers in Canada were the first ones who organized in mass against Covid and now we have to rely on their common sense again. I get their point. If you want to cost Trump $350 million on bullshit charges, we are going to hit you for $3 billion in damages you POS New Yorkers. I am done trying to convince these Dems of anything. They are so dumb they think this is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
What really gets me is the Covid crap we had to deal with. How many boosters you Dems get it? You still wearing masks and social distancing? Uh, why not? There is still Covid out there. You can still die from it just look at all the daily deaths in the world. Look up the numbers if you do not believe me.
It was only after states like Texas and Florida opened up that the gutless ones like California and New York saw the hits to their pocket books that they backed down. WAIT, YOU MEAN WE CANNOT JUST PRINT MONEY AND STAY HOME? That is what it is going to take with New York, getting hit in the pocket book.
I just hope the first thing Trump does when he gets in office is start over with law enforcement. Just destroy the corrupt FBI, CIA, and NSA and start fresh. They do way more harm than good. ".
They just cheated in Pakistan and Bangladesh and Washington Dc in 2020.
If they try this shit again in Nov, look out.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/18/world/asia/pakistan-election.html[/URL]
-
Perhaps in 20-30 years
[QUOTE=Spidy;2894768]Jennifer and James Crumbley were the [B]first parents[/B] in the US to be charged in a mass school shooting committed by their child, Ethan Crumbley who is serving a life sentence in prison.
While I applaud the ruling, congress and the courts should go one better and repeal PLCAA, one of the dumbest / numbskull laws ever. PLCAA, was a Repub backed bill, pass by George "Dubya" Bush administration, back in 2005, to protect gun manufacturers from being sued, from those harmed by their products, can't sue the pants of them. No other manufacturers in industry has this kind of immunity.
Maybe if they didn't have such immunity, perhaps they'd put safer gun measures into their products, for fear of being sued, like everyone else?[/QUOTE]Look at the SCOTUS composition where this repeal would inevitably end up even if victorious.
-
Trump is selling shoes.
Have Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham picked up a pair?
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/17/politics/trump-sneakers-pay-millions-new-york-trial/index.html[/URL]
-
Another Trump Fraud and / or Bribe Money Laundering scheme in the making?
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2894942]Have Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham picked up a pair?
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/17/politics/trump-sneakers-pay-millions-new-york-trial/index.html[/URL][/QUOTE]If he sells one pair to Elvis for $399,000,000, that ought to do it for at least one of his several Fraud liabilities.
LOL. He got booed at his grand sneakers launch:
[B]Donald Trump Booed Onstage While Promoting New $399 Sneakers.
Feb. 18, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-booed-onstage-399-sneakers-philadelphia-1870965[/URL]
Launching this new potential Trump Fraud just months before he and his cult followers are drooling over the idea that he will take Office in the White House again, can it be assumed he has no intention of divesting himself of the control or benefits of this new business venture and will instead use the sale of those ugly shoes as a Money Laundering mechanism for political bribes in exchange for him "serving" China, Saudi Arabia and other USA adversaries?
Like he did with his failed golf resorts and condos last time.
-
Apparently, 64 is just too old to be a Repub Congressman.
Didn't he prepare and rehearse his statement extensively on this one topic for that brief and long term planned interview? He is a Repub Congressman. By definition that means he is not busy doing anything else for his paycheck.
Also, the 47 year old interviewer didn't correct him. Maybe she didn't notice it because she is too old for her job, too.
[B]GOP Rep. Promises 'President Johnson' Will Save Ukraine.
Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) mistakenly called House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) "president" during an interview about the importance of defending Ukraine.[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/02/gop-rep-promises-president-johnson-will[/URL]
[QUOTE]"Well, President Johnson has made a number of public statements committing to finding a pathway for the aid for Ukraine," Turner proclaimed. "I believe him. I think that we will."
Welker did not correct the congressman.[/QUOTE]That would have been worth at least 2 prime time hours of attention on Fux News every night for a week and on Mainstream Media for at least 3 nights if Joe Biden had uttered that misstatement. LOL.
-
Thumbs Up for me...
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2894942]Have Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham picked up a pair?
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/17/politics/trump-sneakers-pay-millions-new-york-trial/index.html[/URL][/QUOTE]
You know what?...I think this may yet be the best single idea, Trump, has pushed on his cult followers. Yes, way better than an NFT.
The good thing is, at the very east it'll be easy enough, for the rest of us to spot, the gullible MAGA cult, in public. (...kkkk!)
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2894936][b]Perhaps in 20-30 years. [/b]Look at the SCOTUS composition where this repeal would inevitably end up even if victorious. [/QUOTE] Unfortunately, true! But a lot can happen in 20-30 years.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2895072]You know what?...I think this may yet be the best single idea, Trump, has pushed on his cult followers. Yes, way better than an NFT.
The good thing is, at the very east it'll be easy enough, for the rest of us to spot, the gullible MAGA cult, in public. (...kkkk!) [/QUOTE]I'm just wondering how long that gold coating is going to last as it looks like spray paint. But it doesn't matter for now as that model is already sold out. There's other shoe choices though. Be advised there's a three per order limit. Wink.
[URL]https://gettrumpsneakers.com/[/URL]
-
Happy President's Day!
This is excerpted from the New York Times. Oh, if only somebody here was a subscriber because he loves these NYT articles so much and he could post the original NYT report:
[B]Poll of historians ranks Biden 14th-best president, Trump worst.
Feb
18, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2024/feb/18/poll-of-historians-ranks-biden-14th-best-president/[/URL]
[QUOTE]A new poll of historians coming out on Presidents Day weekend ranks [b]Biden as the 14th-best president in American history,
just ahead of Woodrow Wilson, Ronald Reagan and Ulysses S. Grant.[/b] While that may not get Biden a spot on Mount Rushmore, it certainly puts him well ahead of Trump, who places dead last as the worst president in the nations history. Indeed, Biden may owe his place in the top third in part to Trump. Although he has claims to a historical legacy by managing the end of the COVID pandemic; rebuilding the nations roads, bridges and other infrastructure; and leading an international coalition against Russian aggression, Bidens signature accomplishment, according to the historians, was evicting Trump from the Oval Office.
[B]"Bidens most important achievements may be that he rescued the presidency from
Trump[/b], resumed a more traditional style of presidential leadership and is gearing up to keep the office out of his predecessors hands this fall, wrote Justin Vaughn and Brandon Rottinghaus, the college professors who conducted the survey and announced the results in The Los Angeles Times.
[B]Trump[/b] might not care much what a bunch of academics think, but for what its worth he [b]fares badly even among the self-identified
Republican historians.[/b] Finishing 45th overall, Trump trails even the mid-19th-century failures who blundered the country into a civil war or botched its aftermath like James Buchanan, Franklin Pierce and Andrew Johnson.
[/QUOTE]
-
I will say unequivocally, I'm extremely jealous!!
"What lies and which witnesses were those?
This is what Trump's own Department of Justice found regarding the FBI's necessary and totally justifiable investigation of Trump, Camp Trump and their extraordinarily deep and intense collusion with Russia all through the election:
There was only evidence against the FBI of making mistakes on the forms required to initiate their necessary and justifiable investigation and too little evidence of wrongdoing to charge whatever "lying" witnesses you are referring to.
"Russia, if you're listening", neither your top American political stooge Donald Trump nor your and MAGA's top useful idiot in the media Tucker Carlson has yet uttered one word of criticism for your Murdering your political enemies. Actually, your and MAGA's top useful idiot in the media has lovingly defended and supported it. ".
"Russia, if you're listening", neither your top American political stooge Donald Trump nor your and MAGA's top useful idiot in the media Tucker Carlson has yet uttered one word of criticism for your Murdering your political enemies. ".
Who wouldn't love to see Adam Schiff Bubba and Mitt Romney in here.
[URL]https://www.aol.com/news/inside-putin-gulag-archipelago-beatings-173146716.html[/URL]
I say clear out Guantanamo today and get it ready for Jan 20.
-
1 photos
"Prostitution is legal in the USA hence the Nevada brothels, but the Feds are hell bent on finding ways to make it illegal by using the bullshit accusations like money laundering, human trafficking ETC. It amazes me how many sex workers have said they know very few if any women who have been trafficked, but we see endless warnings about it.
The fucking FBI can lie all they want AKA Russiagate but you cannot. You handled it right. You do not say anything with those assholes because they will lie about what you said.
The only good news is the perverted Democratic Department of Justice may have gone too far. I am sure you have heard about the $364 billion Trump verdict as Dems tried like crazy to spin it that there were victims with it when they were none. It was such bullshit that the truckers of America have had enough.
Truck drivers transport between 70% to 73% of all freight in the United States. Therefore, when truckers begin discussing plans on social media to boycott loads to progressive hellhole New York City, it's important to pay attention.
X user Chicago1 Ray, who appears to be a Midwest truck driver, shared a video late Friday night detailing that a number of truck drivers will begin denying loads to NYC on Monday.
"I don't know how far across the country this is. Or how many truckers are going start denying loads to NYC. But I'll tell you. You f**k around and find out," Chicago1 Ray said.
He continued: "We're tired of motherf**king leftist f**king with Trump. Okay. Motherfu**ers start to get tired of this shit. Our bosses aren't going to care if we deny loads. We'll go somewhere else. ".
"You know how hard it is to get in and out of NYC?" the trucker emphasized. I've been on the radio for over an hour and I've talked to at least (10) Truckers who are going to start refusing loads of Monday for (NYC) . I talked to (3) guys that I work with who texted the boss and told him no (NYC).
By Saturday morning, the video had amassed nearly 3 million views.
End of link. The truckers in Canada were the first ones who organized in mass against Covid and now we have to rely on their common sense again. I get their point. If you want to cost Trump $350 million on bullshit charges, we are going to hit you for $3 billion in damages you POS New Yorkers. I am done trying to convince these Dems of anything. They are so dumb they think this is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
What really gets me is the Covid crap we had to deal with. How many boosters you Dems get it? You still wearing masks and social distancing? Uh, why not? There is still Covid out there. You can still die from it just look at all the daily deaths in the world. Look up the numbers if you do not believe me.
It was only after states like Texas and Florida opened up that the gutless ones like California and New York saw the hits to their pocket books that they backed down. WAIT, YOU MEAN WE CANNOT JUST PRINT MONEY AND STAY HOME? That is what it is going to take with New York, getting hit in the pocket book.
I just hope the first thing Trump does when he gets in office is start over with law enforcement. Just destroy the corrupt FBI, CIA, and NSA and start fresh. They do way more harm than good. ".
They just cheated in Pakistan and Bangladesh and Washington Dc in 2020.
If they try this shit again in Nov, look out.
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/alexander-fan-sentenced-fbi-agent-042605423.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAAkLYBq1Rs-RWIs6BUYq51boRM2s-Oj4eE_zr6T7mmBcp0Q2Gpl6z6Z1G8VoUYEr9WwDEcR63aI15wrDsW7URuGgnDPbnwdzxqrl5bYNbxBCwrOxXvVrQeXrVZNeMLH--Nc2IH5R7nhnrJpj9arnJiixKE8NoW6xdVNdis6uwqfz[/URL]
-
Too old to be a pro Repub Bothsider pundit?
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2895248]
....
Who wouldn't love to see Adam Schiff Bubba and Mitt Romney in here.
[URL]https://www.aol.com/news/inside-putin-gulag-archipelago-beatings-173146716.html[/URL]
I say clear out Guantanamo today and get it ready for Jan 20.[/QUOTE]I watched your and many other Winger's favorite pro Repub "Bothsider" Presidential Election Closer pundit, Bill Maher, last Friday night.
He showed the campaign ad for RFK, Jr. For President! That ran during the Super Bowl, just in case anyone in his viewing audience missed it and, as Bill surely hopes, might swing enough vote percentages to his beloved Trump to close the election for him as such a tiny "Bothsider" percentage did in 2016. And as it did for GW Bush in 2000 with Bill's incomparable assistance.
Bill introduced the ad as "the same one his (RFK, Jr's) [B]Dad[/B] ran in his 1960 campaign for president" except with the necessary name change.
That was a long prepared and planned for segment. 67 year old Bill Maher was even referring to his notes to introduce it. Apparently, nobody else on his discussion panel or later, all under the age of 70, noticed and pointed out that glaringly obvious and, frankly, weird misstatement of history and relationship.
Oh, and nobody on Fux News or any MSM outlet has yet devoted so much a 15 seconds mentioning that public misstatement by the now "Most Trusted" pro Repub "Bothsider" pundit in America way last Friday.
Lolol.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2895196]This is excerpted from the New York Times. Oh, if only somebody here was a subscriber because he loves these NYT articles so much and he could post the original NYT report:
[B]Poll of historians ranks Biden 14th-best president, Trump worst.
Feb
18, 2024[/B]
Finishing 45th overall, Trump trails even the mid-19th-century failures who blundered the country into a civil war or botched its aftermath like James Buchanan, Franklin Pierce and Andrew Johnson.[/QUOTE]How many Americans died under Trump when fighting a stupid war? That would be none. That alone puts him ahead of a ton of presidents. Blaming covid on Trump is like blaming a president for people getting cancer. The surprising part to me in this day and age would be a bunch of deranged academics not putting Trump last.
With Biden, I would grade him and / A as he has not been mentally stable through most of his presidency. He won an election? BFD. What president did not?
Ended the pandemic? Well, there is 1. 1 million cases in the USA right now with Covid and people are still dying. What did he do to end it? Republican governors started opening up their states and Democratic ones started losing business and were forced to open too. More people died with Covid under Biden in 2021 than Trump in 2020. He didn't do shit with Covid outside of the pointless vax mandates and Covid swabs to re-enter the USA. Those acts were harmful, uncomfortable, unnecessary, and costly.
There are at least 400,000 Ukrainians dead now and probably more Russians in a war that Biden could have stopped and did not, and these historians consider that a success? That is a failure of epic proportions IMO.
And we pay the taxes to fix roads and bridges. WTF does Biden have to do with that? Are we supposed to be grateful he just did not put that money in his pocket?
A far more interesting question was who was the WOAT pondered at Zero Hedge? The comments were priceless, educational, and unlike this moronic poll, a bit of a surprise. [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/who-woat-president[/URL].
Thing is anyone who puts Obama, Trump, or even Biden on the WOAT list bores the piss out of me.
-
Uh
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2895315]How many Americans died under Trump when fighting a stupid war? That would be none. That alone puts him ahead of a ton of presidents. Blaming covid on Trump is like blaming a president for people getting cancer. The surprising part to me in this day and age would be a bunch of deranged academics not putting Trump last.
With Biden, I would grade him and / A as he has not been mentally stable through most of his presidency. He won an election? BFD. What president did not?
Ended the pandemic? Well, there is 1. 1 million cases in the USA right now with Covid and people are still dying. What did he do to end it? Republican governors started opening up their states and Democratic ones started losing business and were forced to open too. More people died with Covid under Biden in 2021 than Trump in 2020. He didn't do shit with Covid outside of the pointless vax mandates and Covid swabs to re-enter the USA. Those acts were harmful, uncomfortable, unnecessary, and costly.[/QUOTE]None? You must have gotten that grossly mistaken impression from the Worst President in History.
Naturally, the facts are wildly different.
[B]Trump misleads on Afghanistan[/B]
[URL]https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-trump-afghanistan-troops-killed-659053265479[/URL]
[QUOTE]During Trumps presidency, which ran from January 20, 2017, to January 20, 2021, [b]there were 45 combat deaths among U.S. service members reported in Afghanistan, as
well as 18 non-hostile deaths[/b], according to the Defense Casualty Analysis System.[/QUOTE]According to my math, 45+18=58. Far from none.
[URL]https://dcas.dmdc.osd.mil/dcas/app/conflictCasualties/ofs/byMonth[/URL]
[B]Under Biden? 26 deaths. Total deaths.[/B] See link above.
That includes the 13 that were killed by a single loony suicide bomb that got past Trump's Victors, the Taliban, who were in total control of security during the withdrawal in accordance with Trump's total and complete surrender agreement to them.
Remember, Trump kept the United States of America directly involved in a combat war for every minute of every hour of every day of his miserable, Worst In History so-called presidency.
Since Biden's Least Deadly Withdrawal From an Occupied Country by the Loser in a War re the War in Afghanistan back in 2021, The United States of America has not been directly engaged in any combat war anywhere on the planet.
Oh, look, here is a bit more on those Bi-Partisan Historians' ranking of USA Presidents:
[B]Biden 14th in scholars' presidential rankings, Trump last.[/B]
[URL]https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2024/02/19/biden-14th-in-scholars--presidential-rankings--trump-last[/URL]
[QUOTE]other questions asked, respondents voted Trump as the most polarizing president ever. [B]Carter was considered the most underrated commander-in-chief[/b], while John F. Kennedy was voted the most
overrated.[/QUOTE]Interesting. As overrated as they considered JFK to be, he still wound up in the Top 10.
-
How do you sell out items that aren't made yet?
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2895144]I'm just wondering how long that gold coating is going to last as it looks like spray paint. But it doesn't matter for now as that model is already sold out. There's other shoe choices though. Be advised there's a three per order limit. Wink.
[URL]https://gettrumpsneakers.com/[/URL][/QUOTE][URL]https://gettrumpsneakers.com/pages/faq[/URL]
Like all things Trump, please read the fine prints or FAQs.
-
That was fast.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2895249]"Prostitution is legal in the USA hence the Nevada brothels, but the Feds are hell bent on finding ways to make it illegal by using the bullshit accusations like money laundering, human trafficking ETC. It amazes me how many sex workers have said they know very few if any women who have been trafficked, but we see endless warnings about it.
The fucking FBI can lie all they want AKA Russiagate but you cannot. You handled it right. You do not say anything with those assholes because they will lie about what you said.
The only good news is the perverted Democratic Department of Justice may have gone too far. I am sure you have heard about the $364 billion Trump verdict as Dems tried like crazy to spin it that there were victims with it when they were none. It was such bullshit that the truckers of America have had enough.
Truck drivers transport between 70% to 73% of all freight in the United States. Therefore, when truckers begin discussing plans on social media to boycott loads to progressive hellhole New York City, it's important to pay attention.
X user Chicago1 Ray, who appears to be a Midwest truck driver, shared a video late Friday night detailing that a number of truck drivers will begin denying loads to NYC on Monday.
"I don't know how far across the country this is. Or how many truckers are going start denying loads to NYC. But I'll tell you. You f**k around and find out," Chicago1 Ray said.
He continued: "We're tired of motherf**king leftist f**king with Trump. Okay. Motherfu**ers start to get tired of this shit. Our bosses aren't going to care if we deny loads. We'll go somewhere else. ".
"You know how hard it is to get in and out of NYC?" the trucker emphasized. I've been on the radio for over an hour and I've talked to at least (10) Truckers who are going to start refusing loads of Monday for (NYC) . I talked to (3) guys that I work with who texted the boss and told him no (NYC).
By Saturday morning, the video had amassed nearly 3 million views.
End of link. The truckers in Canada were the first ones who organized in mass against Covid and now we have to rely on their common sense again. I get their point. If you want to cost Trump $350 million on bullshit charges, we are going to hit you for $3 billion in damages you POS New Yorkers. I am done trying to convince these Dems of anything. They are so dumb they think this is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
What really gets me is the Covid crap we had to deal with. How many boosters you Dems get it? You still wearing masks and social distancing? Uh, why not? There is still Covid out there. You can still die from it just look at all the daily deaths in the world. Look up the numbers if you do not believe me.
It was only after states like Texas and Florida opened up that the gutless ones like California and New York saw the hits to their pocket books that they backed down. WAIT, YOU MEAN WE CANNOT JUST PRINT MONEY AND STAY HOME? That is what it is going to take with New York, getting hit in the pocket book.
I just hope the first thing Trump does when he gets in office is start over with law enforcement. Just destroy the corrupt FBI, CIA, and NSA and start fresh. They do way more harm than good. ".
They just cheated in Pakistan and Bangladesh and Washington Dc in 2020.
If they try this shit again in Nov, look out.
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/alexander-fan-sentenced-fbi-agent-042605423.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAAkLYBq1Rs-RWIs6BUYq51boRM2s-Oj4eE_zr6T7mmBcp0Q2Gpl6z6Z1G8VoUYEr9WwDEcR63aI15wrDsW7URuGgnDPbnwdzxqrl5bYNbxBCwrOxXvVrQeXrVZNeMLH--Nc2IH5R7nhnrJpj9arnJiixKE8NoW6xdVNdis6uwqfz[/URL][/QUOTE][URL]https://www.foxnews.com/us/chicago-ray-walks-back-trucker-nyc-boycott-says-leave-trump-alone[/URL]
Capitalism: One man refusal to truck products is another man's payday.
-
It's Official, Trump is the WORST PRESIDENT in US history...PERIOD!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2895196]This is excerpted from the New York Times. Oh, if only somebody here was a subscriber because he loves these NYT articles so much and he could post the original NYT report:
[B]Poll of historians ranks Biden 14th-best president, Trump worst.
Feb 18, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2024/feb/18/poll-of-historians-ranks-biden-14th-best-president/[/URL]
Finishing 45th overall, Trump trails even the mid-19th-century failures who blundered the country into a civil war or botched its aftermath like James Buchanan, Franklin Pierce and Andrew Johnson.[/QUOTE]
Just love this post, as yet another prime example of how, [b]everything Trump touches, literally turns to "shit",[/b] in one form or another.
Of course Dems and most Independents, already and without question, know "Trump is the WORST PRESIDENT in US history".
But having it published once again (especially since it's written by NYT), it serves as a reminder for Repubs, and should put this debate to bed once and for all.
-
Trump loyalists aren't that gulliable...are they?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2894972]If he sells one pair to Elvis for $399,000,000, that ought to do it for at least one of his several Fraud liabilities. [/QUOTE]
Really EihTooms? Come now! Even I know Elvis 2008, [b]isn't that gullible!!![/b]
Elvis 2008, would never pay MORE THAN $4 billion! (...kkkk!). Naturally, they'd have to be a personally autographed pair by Trump (and Melania?)
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2894972] LOL. He got booed at his grand sneakers launch:
[B]Donald Trump Booed Onstage While Promoting New $399 Sneakers.
Feb. 18, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-booed-onstage-399-sneakers-philadelphia-1870965[/URL]
Launching this new potential Trump Fraud just months before he and his cult followers are drooling over the idea that he will take Office in the White House again, can it be assumed he has no intention of divesting himself of the control or benefits of this new business venture and will instead use the sale of those ugly shoes as a Money Laundering mechanism for political bribes in exchange for him "serving" China, Saudi Arabia and other USA adversaries?
Like he did with his failed golf resorts and condos last time.[/QUOTE] With all that booing...[b]you think[/b] the MAGA cult is finally catching on to his grifts? Or was it that they didn't perhaps like the color of the sneakers....kkkk!
-
Why I like Our system
What is dangerous about the hatred toward the court system is that if we do not have this system, what do we replace it with? Violence, survival of the fittest, who has more money wins, those with powers win?
Here's a simple idea:
When people (individuals / organizations / states) have disagreements they take their greivences to court. In court, a randomly selected Judge is the arbiter of facts, Jurors will determine which party wins based on which presentations is more convincing. Loser can appeal the decision to a higher court until it reaches its final destination, the Supreme Court. Everyone abides by the final decision.
Amazingly, we wrote this into our constitution because the system in England favored the rich, powerful, and connected.
Timeline: State of New York V Trump.
1. Trump was accused of Fraud and the plantiff is the citizen of New York (state). Prior to court trial, he made series of motions to dismiss, it was denied. He appealled and was denied.
2. Evidence Submission Process. NY supplied Trump with evidence to be presented at trial for Trump's defense.
3. Trump submitted motion for summary judgement. New York (Attorney General) submitted motion for summary judgement. NY wins all but 7 issues which go to trial for final determination.
4. Bench Trial (no Jurors); Trump team forgot to check the box for Jury Trial.
5. Both sides presented their evidence and witnesses with the burden of proof lies with the State of New York.
6. Judge determined that the state has satisfied the burden of proof and the State with wins the trial. Judgement of $350 million plus interest of $100 million (3 years at 9% Not operating a business in New York for 3 years; plus co-defendants also pay and have other stipulations on conducting business in NY.
Now Trump has 30 days to file an appeal, provided that he can find a bond agency to put up the cash in escrow, or Trump can put up the cash himself. If he wins appeal, he gets his money back.
[URL]https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/trump-decision.pdf[/URL]
I don't see the controversy. If you were a NY AG, wouldn't you want to prosecute a business and get the money back to your citizen, if you believe you can prove it in court?
-
Don't fret young man, the 2nd coming is coming
"How many Americans died under Trump when fighting a stupid war? That would be none. That alone puts him ahead of a ton of presidents. Blaming covid on Trump is like blaming a president for people getting cancer. The surprising part to me in this day and age would be a bunch of deranged academics not putting Trump last.
With Biden, I would grade him and / A as he has not been mentally stable through most of his presidency. He won an election? BFD. What president did not?
Ended the pandemic? Well, there is 1. 1 million cases in the USA right now with Covid and people are still dying. What did he do to end it? Republican governors started opening up their states and Democratic ones started losing business and were forced to open too. More people died with Covid under Biden in 2021 than Trump in 2020. He didn't do shit with Covid outside of the pointless vax mandates and Covid swabs to re-enter the USA. Those acts were harmful, uncomfortable, unnecessary, and costly.
There are at least 400,000 Ukrainians dead now and probably more Russians in a war that Biden could have stopped and did not, and these historians consider that a success? That is a failure of epic proportions IMO.
And we pay the taxes to fix roads and bridges. WTF does Biden have to do with that? Are we supposed to be grateful he just did not put that money in his pocket?
A far more interesting question was who was the WOAT pondered at Zero Hedge? The comments were priceless, educational, and unlike this moronic poll, a bit of a surprise. [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/who-woat-president[/URL].
Thing is anyone who puts Obama, Trump, or even Biden on the WOAT list bores the piss out of me. ".
[URL]https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1758529993280205039[/URL] must see TV!
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/11/us/politics/trump-2025-immigration-agenda.html[/URL]
GIVE THE TIMES.
Account.
Donald J. Trump, wearing a suit and tie, claps during a campaign rally at night.
Donald Trump wants to reimpose a Covid 19-era policy of refusing asylum claims — this time basing that refusal on assertions that migrants carry other infectious diseases like tuberculosis. Credit. Doug Mills / The New York Times.
Sweeping Raids, Giant Camps and Mass Deportations: Inside Trump's 2025 Immigration Plans.
If he regains power, Donald Trump wants not only to revive some of the immigration policies criticized as draconian during his presidency, but expand and toughen them.
Donald Trump wants to reimpose a Covid 19-era policy of refusing asylum claims — this time basing that refusal on assertions that migrants carry other infectious diseases like tuberculosis. Credit. Doug Mills / The New York Times.
Share full article.
1. 9 K.
Charlie SavageMaggie HabermanJonathan Swan.
By Charlie Savage, Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan.
Nov. 11,2023.
Leer en españolLeer en español.
Former President Donald J. Trump is planning an extreme expansion of his first-term crackdown on immigration if he returns to power in 2025 — including preparing to round up undocumented people already in the United States on a vast scale and detain them in sprawling camps while they wait to be expelled.
The plans would sharply restrict both legal and illegal immigration in a multitude of ways.
Mr. Trump wants to revive his first-term border policies, including banning entry by people from certain Muslim-majority nations and reimposing a Covid 19-era policy of refusing asylum claims — though this time he would base that refusal on assertions that migrants carry other infectious diseases like tuberculosis.
He plans to scour the country for unauthorized immigrants and deport people by the millions per year.
To help speed mass deportations, Mr. Trump is preparing an enormous expansion of a form of removal that does not require due process hearings. To help Immigration and Customs Enforcement carry out sweeping raids, he plans to reassign other federal agents and deputize local police officers and National Guard soldiers voluntarily contributed by Republican-run states.
ADVERTISEMENT.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
To ease the strain on ICE detention facilities, Mr. Trump wants to build huge camps to detain people while their cases are processed and they await deportation flights. And to get around any refusal by Congress to appropriate the necessary funds, Mr. Trump would redirect money in the military budget, as he did in his first term to spend more on a border wall than Congress had authorized.
ImageA side view of Stephen Miller as he stands and gives a speech.
"Trump will unleash the vast arsenal of federal powers to implement the most spectacular migration crackdown," said Stephen Miller, Mr. Trump's former White House aide who was the chief architect of his border control efforts. Credit. Cooper Neill for The New York Times.
In a public reference to his plans, Mr. Trump told a crowd in Iowa in September: "Following the Eisenhower model, we will carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history. " The reference was to a 1954 campaign to round up and expel Mexican immigrants that was named for an ethnic slur — "Operation Wetback. ".
The constellation of Mr. Trump's 2025 plans amounts to an assault on immigration on a scale unseen in modern American history. Millions of undocumented immigrants would be barred from the country or uprooted from it years or even decades after settling here.
Such a scale of planned removals would raise logistical, financial and diplomatic challenges and would be vigorously challenged in court. But there is no mistaking the breadth and ambition of the shift Mr. Trump is eyeing.
In a second Trump presidency, the visas of foreign students who participated in anti-Israel or pro-Palestinian protests would be canceled. USA Consular officials abroad will be directed to expand ideological screening of visa applicants to block people the Trump administration considers to have undesirable attitudes. People who were granted temporary protected status because they are from certain countries deemed unsafe, allowing them to lawfully live and work in the United States, would have that status revoked.
Similarly, numerous people who have been allowed to live in the country temporarily for humanitarian reasons would also lose that status and be kicked out, including tens of thousands of the Afghans who were evacuated amid the 2021 Taliban takeover and allowed to enter the United States. Afghans holding special visas granted to people who helped USA Forces would be revetted to see if they really did.
And Mr. Trump would try to end birthright citizenship for babies born in the United States to undocumented parents — by proclaiming that policy to be the new position of the government and by ordering agencies to cease issuing citizenship-affirming documents like Social Security cards and passports to them. That policy's legal legitimacy, like nearly all of Mr. Trump's plans, would be virtually certain to end up before the Supreme Court.
In interviews with The New York Times, several Trump advisers gave the most expansive and detailed description yet of Mr. Trump's immigration agenda in a potential second term. In particular, Mr. Trump's campaign referred questions for this article to Stephen Miller, an architect of Mr. Trump's first-term immigration policies who remains close to him and is expected to serve in a senior role in a second administration.
All of the steps Trump advisers are preparing, Mr. Miller contended in a wide-ranging interview, rely on existing statutes; while the Trump team would likely seek a revamp of immigration laws, the plan was crafted to need no new substantive legislation. And while acknowledging that lawsuits would arise to challenge nearly every one of them, he portrayed the Trump team's daunting array of tactics as a "blitz" designed to overwhelm immigrant-rights lawyers.
Editors' Picks.
Leaving 'Mr. Mom' Behind.
Those $399 Gold Trump Sneakers Are About a Lot More Than Shoes.
Fashion Has Entered a New Era of Elegance.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
ADVERTISEMENT.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
"Any activists who doubt President Trump's resolve in the slightest are making a drastic error: Trump will unleash the vast arsenal of federal powers to implement the most spectacular migration crackdown," Mr. Miller said, adding, "The immigration legal activists won't know what's happening. ".
Todd Schulte, the president of FWD. Us, an immigration and criminal justice advocacy group that repeatedly fought the Trump administration, said the Trump team's plans relied on "xenophobic demagoguery" that appeals to his hardest-core political base.
"Americans should understand these policy proposals are an authoritarian, often illegal, agenda that would rip apart nearly every aspect of American life — tanking the economy, violating the basic civil rights of millions of immigrants and native-born Americans alike," Mr. Schulte said.
'Poisoning the Blood'.
Image.
Dozens of migrants sit and stand on a Manhattan sidewalk waiting to be processed.
Migrants gather outside the Roosevelt Hotel in Midtown Manhattan in August, waiting to be processed. Credit. Jeenah Moon for The New York Times.
Since Mr. Trump left office, the political environment on immigration has moved in his direction. He is also more capable now of exploiting that environment if he is re-elected than he was when he first won election as an outsider.
The ebbing of the Covid-19 pandemic and resumption of travel flows have helped stir a global migrant crisis, with millions of Venezuelans and Central Americans fleeing turmoil and Africans arriving in Latin American countries before continuing their journey north. Amid the record numbers of migrants at the southern border and beyond it in cities like New York and Chicago, voters are frustrated and even some Democrats are calling for tougher action against immigrants and pressuring the White House to better manage the crisis.
Mr. Trump and his advisers see the opening, and now know better how to seize it. The aides Mr. Trump relied upon in the chaotic early days of his first term were sometimes at odds and lacked experience in how to manipulate the levers of federal power. By the end of his first term, cabinet officials and lawyers who sought to restrain some of his actions — like his Homeland Security secretary and chief of staff, John F. Kelly — had been fired, and those who stuck with him had learned much.
In a second term, Mr. Trump plans to install a team that will not restrain him.
Since much of Mr. Trump's first-term immigration crackdown was tied up in the courts, the legal environment has tilted in his favor: His four years of judicial appointments left behind federal appellate courts and a Supreme Court that are far more conservative than the courts that heard challenges to his first-term policies.
The fight over Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals provides an illustration.
DACA is an Obama-era program that shields from deportation and grants work permits to people who were brought unlawfully to the United States as children. Mr. Trump tried to end it, but the Supreme Court blocked him on procedural grounds in June 2020.
Mr. Miller said Mr. Trump would try again to end DACA. And the 5-4 majority of the Supreme Court that blocked the last attempt no longer exists: A few months after the DACA ruling, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died and Mr. Trump replaced her with a sixth conservative, Justice Amy Coney Barrett.
Mr. Trump's rhetoric has more than kept up with his increasingly extreme agenda on immigration.
His stoking of fear and anger toward immigrants — pushing for a border wall and calling Mexicans rapists — fueled his 2016 takeover of the Republican Party. As president, he privately mused about developing a militarized border like Israel's, asked whether migrants crossing the border could be shot in the legs and wanted a proposed border wall topped with flesh-piercing spikes and painted black to burn migrants' skin.
As he has campaigned for the party's third straight presidential nomination, his anti-immigrant tone has only grown harsher. In a recent interview with a right-wing website, Mr. Trump claimed without evidence that foreign leaders were deliberately emptying their "insane asylums" to send the patients across America's southern border as migrants. He said migrants were "poisoning the blood of our country. " And at a rally on Wednesday in Florida, he compared them to the fictional serial killer and cannibal Hannibal Lecter, saying, "That's what's coming into our country right now. ".
Mr. Trump had similarly vowed to carry out mass deportations when running for office in 2016, but the government only managed several hundred thousand removals per year under his presidency, on par with other recent administrations. If they get another opportunity, Mr. Trump and his team are determined to achieve annual numbers in the millions.
Keeping People Out.
Image.
Migrants stand in a line on the side of a road, in the glow of a truck's headlights.
Migrants wait to be escorted by Border Patrol agents to a processing area in September. Mr. Trump's stoking of fear and anger toward immigrants fueled his 2016 takeover of the Republican Party. Credit. Mark Abramson for The New York Times.
Mr. Trump's immigration plan is to pick up where he left off and then go much farther. He would not only revive some of the policies that were criticized as draconian during his presidency, many of which the Biden White House ended, but also expand and toughen them.
One example centers on expanding first-term policies aimed at keeping people out of the country. Mr. Trump plans to suspend the nation's refugee program and once again categorically bar visitors from troubled countries, reinstating a version of his ban on travel from several mostly Muslim-majority countries, which President Biden called discriminatory and ended on his first day in office.
Mr. Trump would also use coercive diplomacy to induce other nations to help, including by making cooperation a condition of any other bilateral engagement, Mr. Miller said. For example, a second Trump administration would seek to re-establish an agreement with Mexico that asylum seekers remain there while their claims are processed. (It is not clear that Mexico would agree; a Mexican court has said that deal violated human rights.).
Mr. Trump would also push to revive "safe third country" agreements with several nations in Central America, and try to expand them to Africa, Asia and South America. Under such deals, countries agree to take would-be asylum seekers from specific other nations and let them apply for asylum there instead.
While such arrangements have traditionally only covered migrants who had previously passed through a third country, federal law does not require that limit and a second Trump administration would seek to make those deals without it, in part as a deterrent to migrants making what the Trump team views as illegitimate asylum claims.
At the same time, Mr. Miller said, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would invoke the public health emergency powers law known as Title 42 to again refuse to hear any asylum claims by people arriving at the southern border. The Trump administration had internally discussed that idea early in Mr. Trump's term, but some cabinet secretaries pushed back, arguing that there was no public health emergency that would legally justify it. The administration ultimately implemented it during the coronavirus pandemic.
Saying the idea has since gained acceptance in practice — Mr. Biden initially kept the policy — Mr. Miller said Mr. Trump would invoke Title 42, citing "severe strains of the flu, tuberculosis, scabies, other respiratory illnesses like are. S. V. And so on, or just a general issue of mass migration being a public health threat and conveying a variety of communicable diseases. ".
Mr. Trump and his aides have not yet said whether they would re-enact one of the most contentious deterrents to unauthorized immigration that he pursued as president: separating children from their parents, which led to trauma among migrants and difficulties in reuniting families. When pressed, Mr. Trump has repeatedly declined to rule out reviving the policy. After an outcry over the practice, Mr. Trump ended it in 2018 and a judge later blocked the government from putting it back into effect.
Mass Deportations.
Image.
A close-up, hip-level view of federal officers wearing their firearms in their holsters.
Federal immigration-enforcement officers gathered for an arrest operation in May in Pompano Beach, Fla. Credit. Saul Martinez for The New York Times.
Soon after Mr. Trump announced his 2024 campaign for president last November, he met with Tom Homan, who ran ICE for the first year and a half of the Trump administration and was an early proponent of separating families to deter migrants.
In an interview, Mr. Homan recalled that in that meeting, he "agreed to come back" in a second term and would "help to organize and run the largest deportation operation this country's ever seen. ".
Trump advisers' vision of abrupt mass deportations would be a recipe for social and economic turmoil, disrupting the housing market and major industries including agriculture and the service sector.
Mr. Miller cast such disruption in a favorable light.
"Mass deportation will be a labor-market disruption celebrated by American workers, who will now be offered higher wages with better benefits to fill these jobs," he said. "Americans will also celebrate the fact that our nation's laws are now being applied equally, and that one select group is no longer magically exempt. ".
One planned step to overcome the legal and logistical hurdles would be to significantly expand a form of fast-track deportations known as "expedited removal. " It denies undocumented immigrants the usual hearings and opportunity to file appeals, which can take months or years — especially when people are not in custody — and has led to a large backlog. A 1996 law says people can be subject to expedited removal for up to two years after arriving, but to date the executive branch has used it more cautiously, swiftly expelling people picked up near the border soon after crossing.
The Trump administration tried to expand the use of expedited removal, but a court blocked it and then the Biden team canceled the expansion. It remains unclear whether the Supreme Court will rule that it is constitutional to use the law against people who have been living for a significant period in the United States and express fear of persecution if sent home.
Mr. Trump has also said he would invoke an archaic law, the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without due process. That law allows for summary deportation of people from countries with which the United States is at war, that have invaded the United States or that have engaged in "predatory incursions. ".
Image.
Tom Homan stands holding a microphone in his right hand, giving a speech.
Tom Homan, who ran ICE for the first year and a half of the Trump administration, said he told Mr. Trump he would "help to organize and run the largest deportation operation this country's ever seen. "Credit. Rebecca Noble for The New York Times.
The Supreme Court has upheld past uses of that law in wartime. But its text seems to require a link to the actions of a foreign government, so it is not clear whether the justices will allow a president to stretch it to encompass drug cartel activity.
More broadly, Mr. Miller said a new Trump administration would shift from the ICE practice of arresting specific people to carrying out workplace raids and other sweeps in public places aimed at arresting scores of unauthorized immigrants at once.
To make the process of finding and deporting undocumented immigrants already living inside the country "radically more quick and efficient," he said, the Trump team would bring in "the right kinds of attorneys and the right kinds of policy thinkers" willing to carry out such ideas.
And because of the magnitude of arrests and deportations being contemplated, they plan to build "vast holding facilities that would function as staging centers" for immigrants as their cases progress and they wait to be flown to other countries.
Mr. Miller said the new camps would likely be built "on open land in Texas near the border. ".
He said the military would construct them under the authority and control of the Department of Homeland Security. While he cautioned that there were no specific blueprints yet, he said the camps would look professional and similar to other facilities for migrants that have been built near the border.
Such camps could also enable the government to speed up the pace and volume of deportations of undocumented people who have lived in the United States for years and so are not subject to fast-track removal. If pursuing a long-shot effort to win permission to remain in the country would mean staying locked up in the interim, some may give up and voluntarily accept removal without going through the full process.
The use of these camps, Mr. Miller said, would likely be focused more on single adults because the government cannot indefinitely hold children under a longstanding court order known as the Flores settlement. So any families brought to the facilities would have to be moved in and out more quickly, he said.
The Trump administration tried to overturn the Flores settlement, but the Supreme Court did not resolve the matter before Mr. Trump's term ended. Mr. Miller said the Trump team would try again.
To increase the number of agents available for ICE sweeps, Mr. Miller said, officials from other federal law enforcement agencies would be temporarily reassigned, and state National Guard troops and local police officers, at least from willing Republican-led states, would be deputized for immigration control efforts.
While a law known as the Posse Comitatus Act generally forbids the use of the armed forces for law enforcement purposes, another law called the Insurrection Act creates an exception. Mr. Trump would invoke the Insurrection Act at the border, enabling the use of federal troops to apprehend migrants, Mr. Miller said.
"Bottom line," he said, "President Trump will do whatever it takes. ".
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2895532]
I don't see the controversy. [/QUOTE]That is because you have your head up your ass.
In 2016, IMO Hiliary lost the election because the head of the FBI, James Comey, said she was under investigation right before the election. That was how much respect Americans had for the FBI and DOJ. Now the leading presidential candidate has nearly 100 indictments against him and close to a hundred million Americans are pretty much saying they do not give a shit. Why has there been such a drastic change in their point of view? And you cannot figure it out?
As long as your head is up your ass, no one would expect YOUR POV to change.
-
A recent NYT article you might have missed:
[B]Trumps G.O.P. Is a Confederacy of Fakers.[/B]
[URL]https://dnyuz.com/2024/02/21/trumps-g-o-p-is-a-confederacy-of-fakers/[/URL]
[QUOTE]We are watching two schools of U.S. foreign policy play out over Ukraine. One is the classic U.S. great-power approach, led by a president who grew up in the Cold War and built on a bedrock of American values and interests that have served us well since we entered World War II: We and our allies will negotiate with Putin, but only from a position of strength, not weakness. And our strength derives not just from our money and weapons but also from the fact that Biden has been able to assemble a Western coalition on Ukraine that that amplifies our and our allies strength tenfold.
Trump, by contrast, often behaves as if he learned his world affairs not at Wharton but by watching World Wrestling Entertainment. So much of what he does is purely performative; its about looking strong, about talking tough and about fake body slams, in which everyone is fooled except our rivals.
For example, Trump tore up the Iran nuclear deal in May 2018, claiming it was a giveaway by Barack Obama. But he did it with no diplomatic plan to secure a better deal and no strategic plan or allies to confront Iran if it exploited Trumps move by pushing ahead toward a nuclear bomb. So Iran, which, under Obama, was being kept about a year away from having enough fissile material to build a nuclear bomb, is now just a few weeks away. Thats what performative diplomacy gets you..[/QUOTE]And there is so much more worth reading in that NYT article you might have missed.
-
Oh no
Man, are cult members of the MAGATea Party hopping mad about this:
[B]Major Texas Newspaper Endorses Joe Biden.[/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/houston-chronicle-endorse-biden-texas-trump-maga-1871423[/URL]
[QUOTE]A number of Republican and MAGA figures have reacted angrily after The Houston Chronicle, one of the biggest newspapers in Texas, endorsed President Joe Biden.
The Houston Chronicle's editorial board said they would be backing Biden in the Democratic primary and for re-election so he can "make life better" for the American people as well as prevent the "chaos, corruption and danger to the nation" that would accompany his presumed 2024 Republican challenger Donald Trump returning to the White House.[/QUOTE]By all means, do read on. LOL.
-
When you're right you're right, and when you're not -- you're ridiculous.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2895639]That is because you have your head up your ass.
In 2016, IMO Hiliary lost the election because the head of the FBI, James Comey, said she was under investigation right before the election. That was how much respect Americans had for the FBI and DOJ. Now the leading presidential candidate has nearly 100 indictments against him and close to a hundred million Americans are pretty much saying they do not give a shit. Why has there been such a drastic change in their point of view? And you cannot figure it out?[/QUOTE]I totally agree that Americans have become infinitely more cynical after 4 years of Trump. If it's OK to demand immunity for the President of the United States who committed multiple criminal offences, I'm not surprised at all that disciples of your Lord and Savior (hereinafter L&S) don't give a shit about him stealing classified documents. After all, that's just one crime of many he's been prosecuted for.
As for your 100 million Trumpists claim (out of the total number of 160 million voters), well, that's just old good Elvis, LOL.
-
Ouch, that must've hurt, LOL
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2895718]Man, are cult members of the MAGATea Party hopping mad about this:
[B]Major Texas Newspaper Endorses Joe Biden.[/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/houston-chronicle-endorse-biden-texas-trump-maga-1871423[/URL]
By all means, do read on. LOL.[/QUOTE]"However, the board suggested the president has 'forgotten more than his presumed Republican rival [B]will ever know[/B]. That's not saying much, and at the same time, it says it all. '.
-
Yes, Yes, Yes! A Great Endorsement, A Great Houston Article...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2895718]Man, are cult members of the MAGATea Party hopping mad about this:
[B]Major Texas Newspaper Endorses Joe Biden.[/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/houston-chronicle-endorse-biden-texas-trump-maga-1871423[/URL]
By all means, do read on. LOL.[/QUOTE]
The are a multitude of [b]excellent acknowledgements[/b] to President Joe Biden's accomplishments, w/r to his fine stewardship of the US economy & country, that is worth re-printing.
[b]We endorse Joe Biden for President of the United States in the Democratic Primary (Opinion)[/b]
By The Editorial Board, Feb 19, 2024
[URL]https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/joe-biden-2024-democratic-primary-president-18670527.php[/URL]
[QUOTE] [b]... Under the leadership of the oldest and arguably the most experienced president in American history, [/b]the team in the White House for the past three years has performed remarkably well, despite the rancor and divisiveness that have afflicted this nation for nearly a decade.
The accomplishments of an administration dedicated to governing, one that believes in the power of government to make life better for the American people, is a key reason we heartily endorse the reelection of President Joe Biden. The other reason, equally important, is to fend off the chaos, corruption and danger to the nation that would accompany the return of Donald Trump to the White House.
[/QUOTE]
The Houston Chronicles, then goes on to provide several examples of the President's accomplishments.
[QUOTE] ... One of the clear advantages of a president as experienced as Biden is wisdom: in this case, the wisdom to get the heck out of the Fed's way as it masterfully applied the brakes to what could have been runaway inflation.
The economy has recovered from the perils of the pandemic and is now healthier than that of any other advanced nation. With unemployment approaching a 50-year low,... Inflation is trending downward, somehow, despite all dire prophecies of economists, without the bitter medicine of a recession or a period of high unemployment. Food prices are still high, and hard-working Americans are still wincing at grocery store receipts, but gas prices have fallen, as the U.S. produces more oil than any country in history, including Saudi Arabia. ... the administration is investing $7 billion in an ambitious solar-power project and is promoting other alternative energy projects, as well.
Infrastructure week [u]became a punch line[/u] during [b]the inept Trump administration[/b], but the Biden administration in its first year managed to pass a bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act that's expected to add an estimated 1.5 million jobs per year for the next 10 years.
[/QUOTE]
Unlike Trump's unfulfilled promised to bring back "coal" to rural American workers??? Houston Chronicles, highlights the Biden Infrastructure Bill targets projects in employment distressed counties around the country.
[QUOTE]One of the distressed areas to benefit is Wilbarger County, Texas, along the Red River northwest of Wichita Falls. A $4 billion private-sector venture is constructing a mega-scale green hydrogen plant that's expected to create 115 permanent jobs and more than 1,300 construction jobs in a county where population has declined almost every decade since 1940. Its worth noting that Wilbarger County in 2020 cast 21 percent of its votes for Biden, nearly 78 percent for Trump.
[/QUOTE]
Anyone think Trump would have done the same for a "Dem distressed county", were Biden, won 78% of the vote?
Personally, I'm not yet sold on the "hydrogen solution", being more viable, than the ever growing battery technology space, in the long run...but I guess time will tell, for cleaner hydrogen and said applications, that will use hydrogen.
[QUOTE]...the Affordable Care Act during this administration has made coverage more affordable and more accessible for millions of Americans...
The Biden White House also has given Medicare the power to directly negotiate with Big Pharma, thereby lowering drug prices and placing a $35-per-month cap on the cost of insulin for Medicare beneficiaries...
After decades of thoughts and prayers and little else in response to mass killings, the Biden White House managed to shepherd a bipartisan Safer Communities Act through a balky Congress...
[/QUOTE]
Well written and gives a fair but glowing account of President Biden's stewardship, well worthy of being the [b]14th Best President in History![/b]
-
The Best for Last, from that Article...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2895718]Man, are cult members of the MAGATea Party hopping mad about this:
[B]Major Texas Newspaper Endorses Joe Biden.[/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/houston-chronicle-endorse-biden-texas-trump-maga-1871423[/URL]
By all means, do read on. LOL.[/QUOTE]
This last quote from the Article, says it ALL, w/r to all you need to know about President Joe Biden vs. the other guy.
[QUOTE]We are well aware of Bidens age, 81, (and Trumps, 77), as well as memory lapses that have prompted near-panic among many of the presidents fellow Democrats. Those of us who remember the energetic, garrulous, occasionally even eloquent Joe Biden of years past can see the difference a few years have made, even if he was always prone to gaffes. Accounts other than the report of Special Counsel Robert Hur suggest, however, that Biden remains focused, engaged and in command on the vital issues that occupy a president. Experience counts.
...Like Ronald Reagan, Lyndon Johnson and Franklin Roosevelt, Bidens deft management of his team has made him, arguably, the most productive president since LBJ in the early months of his administration.
He has, as they say, [u]forgotten more than his presumed Republican rival will ever know.[/u] [b]That's not saying much, and at the same time, it says it all. [/b]
[/QUOTE]
President Joe Biden, is the [b]14th Best President in US History.[/b]
-
Thanks for posting more excerpts from the full endorsement
I could not read all of it from the full endorsement because the "subscription required" pop-up kept appearing.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2895818][b] Yes, Yes, Yes! A Great Endorsement, A Great Houston Article... [/b]The are a multitude of [b]excellent acknowledgements[/b] to President Joe Biden's accomplishments, w/r to his fine stewardship of the US economy & country, that is worth re-printing.
[b]We endorse Joe Biden for President of the United States in the Democratic Primary (Opinion)[/b]
By The Editorial Board, Feb 19, 2024
[URL]https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/joe-biden-2024-democratic-primary-president-18670527.php[/URL]
The Houston Chronicles, then goes on to provide several examples of the President's accomplishments.
Unlike Trump's unfulfilled promised to bring back "coal" to rural American workers??? Houston Chronicles, highlights the Biden Infrastructure Bill targets projects in employment distressed counties around the country.
Anyone think Trump would have done the same for a "Dem distressed county", were Biden, won 78% of the vote?
Personally, I'm not yet sold on the "hydrogen solution", being more viable, than the ever growing battery technology space, in the long run...but I guess time will tell, for cleaner hydrogen and said applications, that will use hydrogen.
Well written and gives a fair but glowing account of President Biden's stewardship, well worthy of being the [b]14th Best President in History![/b][/QUOTE]Yeah, I can't imagine any reputable and credible Real News print, cable / network media or internet source endorsing Trump over Biden for President of the United States of America this time around.
Good lord, based on what numbers, easily observable reality, historical and current data and results, demeanor, behavior or any other important factor?
I mean, what could they possibly cite as a decisive "positive" on Trump's side considering that as a Real News source they would have tracked all those factors throughout Biden's and Trump's entire public lives and can't pretend they didn't know that, on balance, Trump's were godawful for America while Biden's were clear net positives for America.
-
Tom Freidman is a mental midget
"Trumps G. O. P. Is a Confederacy of Fakers.
[URL]https://dnyuz.com/2024/02/21/trumps-g-o-p-is-a-confederacy-of-fakers/[/URL]
And there is so much more worth reading in that NYT article you might have missed. ".
Ross on the other hand is easily the smartest man in the bldg.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/21/opinion/china-taiwan-ukraine-war.html[/URL]
OPINION.
ROSS DOUTHAT.
What the Ukraine Aid Debate Is Really About.
Feb. 21,2024.
Under a gray sky, a group of soldiers with helmets and guns walk through a field.
Taiwanese military personnel conducting a drill in January. Credit. Ritchie be. Tongo / EPA, via Shutterstock.
Share full article.
1. 1 K.
Ross Douthat.
By Ross Douthat.
Opinion Columnist.
阅35835;31616;20307;20013;25991;29256;38321;35712;32321;39636;20013;25991;29256;.
Want the latest stories related to China, Russia and Taiwan? Sign up for the newsletter Your Places: Global Update, and we'll send them to your inbox.
Over the weekend Senator J. The. Vance of Ohio went to the Munich Security Conference to play an unpopular part — a spokesman, at a gathering of the Western foreign policy establishment, for the populist critique of American support for Ukraine's war effort.
If you were to pluck a key phrase from his comments, it would be "world of scarcity," which Vance used five times to describe the American strategic situation: stretched by our global commitments, unable to support Ukraine while simultaneously maintaining our position in the Middle East and preparing for a war in East Asia and therefore forced to husband our resources and expect our allies in Europe to counter Russia's armaments and ambitions.
In my Saturday column I wrote about the tensions in the hawkish case for USA Spending on Ukraine, the tendency for the argument to veer from boosterism ("We've got Putin on the ropes! To doomsaying ("Putin's getting stronger every day! While describing the same strategic landscape.
The case Vance pressed in Munich is more consistent, and its premises — not isolationist but Asia-first, more concerned about the Taiwan Strait than the Donbas — have supplied the common ground for Republican critics of our Ukraine policy since early in the war. But consistency is not the same as correctness, and it's worth looking for a moment at why this kind of argument makes Ukraine hawks so frustrated.
ADVERTISEMENT.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
In part, there's a suspicion that some of the people making an Asia-first case don't fully believe it, that it's just a more respectable way of sloughing off American obligations and that if the conservative base or Donald Trump decided it wasn't worth fighting for Taiwan, many China-hawk Republicans would come up with some excuse to justify inaction.
But assuming good faith — and whatever the calculations of Republican politicians, many China hawks are entirely on the level — there's also the problem that this argument privileges hypothetical aggression over real aggression, a potential war over a current one, "contingencies in East Asia" (to quote Vance, again) over an actuality in Eastern Europe. We can't do everything to stop Vladimir Putin today because of something Beijing might conceivably do tomorrow is the fundamental claim, and you can see why people chafe at it.
Indeed, despite agreeing with the overall Asia-first assessment, I chafe at it myself — enough to think that the Biden administration made the right call backing Ukraine initially and that a sharp cutoff in aid would be a mistake even if we should be seeking an armistice.
But weighing contingencies against actuality is always part of what statesmen have to do. And the weighing that prioritizes Taiwan over Ukraine, danger in East Asia over actual war in Europe, depends on two presumptions that are worth making explicit and discussing.
The first is that China is serious not just about taking Taiwan but also about doing it soon. If you think China's military buildup and bellicosity are signaling potential annexation in some distant future, then there's no immediate trade-off between Europe and the Pacific. Instead, in that case it becomes reasonable to think that defeating Putin in the 2020's will give Beijing pause in the 2030's and that the long-term commitment to military production required to arm Ukraine for victory will also help deter China 10 years hence.
Editors' Picks.
How Bob Moore, of Bob's Red Mill, Got Grocery-Store Famous.
The Great Compression.
18 Years Old, Twitter — Now X — Behaves Like a Sullen Teen.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
ADVERTISEMENT.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
But suppose that the peril is much closer, that Beijing's awareness of its long-term challenges makes it more likely to gamble while America is tied down by other crises, internally divided and potentially headed for four years of limited presidential capacity under either party's nominee. In that case our potential strengths in 10 years are irrelevant, and the fact that we're currently building anti-tank and antiaircraft missiles only to burn through them, adding more than $7 in new spending on Ukraine for every $1 dollar in spending related to our Asian and Australian allies and tethering military and diplomatic attention to a trench war in Eastern Europe, means that we're basically inviting the Chinese to make their move, and soon.
Which in turn brings us to the second presumption: that Taiwan falling to its imperial neighbor would change the world for the worse on a greater scale than Ukraine ceding territory or even facing outright defeat.
Listen to 'Matter of Opinion'.
Get more analysis from Ross Douthat and other Opinion writers in this new podcast from New York Times Opinion.
Opinion.
Michelle Cottle, Ross Douthat, Carlos Lozada and Lydia Polgreen.
Are We All Authoritarians at Heart?
Dec. 1, 2023.
If you see the two countries as essentially equivalent, both American clients but not formal NATO-style allies, both democracies vulnerable to authoritarian great-power neighbors, then there's a stronger case for doing everything for Ukraine when it's immediately threatened, regardless of the consequences for Taiwan.
But they are not equivalent. The American commitment to Taiwan goes back almost 70 years, and for all that we've cultivated ambiguity since the Nixon era, the island is still understood to be under the American umbrella in a way that's never been true of Ukraine. Taiwan is also a mature democracy in a way that Ukraine is not, which means its conquest would represent a much more stark form of rollback for the liberal democratic world. And Taiwan's semiconductor industry makes it a much greater economic prize than Ukraine, more likely to hurl the world into recession if the industry is destroyed in a war or grant Beijing newfound power if it's simply absorbed into China's industrial infrastructure.
ADVERTISEMENT.
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT.
Just as important, China is not equivalent to Russia. The latter is a menace but one that — as Vance argues — should theoretically be containable and deterrable, even without American involvement, by a Europe whose G. The. P. Absolutely dwarfs Russia's.
By contrast, China's wealth and potential hard power dwarf all its Asian neighbors, and its conquest of Taiwan would enable a breakout for its naval strength, a much wider projection of authoritarian influence and a reshuffling of economic relationships in Asia and around the world.
For an in-depth argument about these kinds of consequences, I recommend "The Taiwan Catastrophe" by Andrew S. Erickson, Gabriel be. Collins and Matt Pottinger in Foreign Affairs. You don't have to be convinced by every piece of their analysis to grasp the potential stakes. If a Russian victory in Ukraine would feed authoritarian ambitions, a Chinese victory would supercharge them. If Ukraine's defeat would hurt American interests, Taiwan's fall would devastate them.
Which makes the first presumption the dispositive one. If you're seeking full victory in Ukraine, signing up for years of struggle in which Taiwan will be a secondary priority, your choice basically requires betting on China's aggressive intentions being a problem for much later — tomorrow's threat, not today's.
Unlike the Ukraine hawks, I would not take that bet. Unlike the doves, I would not simply cut off the Ukrainians. There is a plausible path between those options, in which aid keeps flowing while the United States pursues a settlement and pivot. But a great deal hangs on whether that narrow way can be traversed: not just for Ukraine or for Taiwan but also for the American imperium as we have known it, the world-bestriding power that we've taken for granted for too long.
-
Lmao
"Man, are cult members of the MAGATea Party hopping mad about this:
Major Texas Newspaper Endorses Joe Biden.
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/houston-chronicle-endorse-biden-texas-trump-maga-1871423[/URL]
By all means, do read on. LOL. ".
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/bill-ackman-joe-biden-democrat/2024/02/21/id/1154385/[/URL]
-
Houston Article...One for the books, a keeper!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2895843]I could not read all of it from the full endorsement because the "subscription required" pop-up kept appearing. [/QUOTE]
Yeah, I'm getting that a lot these days, as it's getting tougher to research and provide links with decent articles.
Anyways, couldn't get the ALL the info from your Newsweek link, so I used one that's actual from the paper's website pages: [URL]https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/joe-biden-2024-democratic-primary-president-18670527.php[/URL]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2895843] [QUOTE=Spidy;2895818]The are a multitude of [b]excellent acknowledgements[/b] to President Joe Biden's accomplishments, w/r to his fine stewardship of the US economy & country, that is worth re-printing.
[b]We endorse Joe Biden for President of the United States in the Democratic Primary (Opinion)[/b]
By The Editorial Board, Feb 19, 2024
[URL]https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/joe-biden-2024-democratic-primary-president-18670527.php[/URL]
The Houston Chronicles, then goes on to provide several examples of the President's accomplishments.
Unlike Trump's unfulfilled promised to bring back "coal" to rural American workers??? Houston Chronicles, highlights the Biden Infrastructure Bill targets projects in employment distressed counties around the country.
Anyone think Trump would have done the same for a "Dem distressed county", were Biden, won 78% of the vote?
Personally, I'm not yet sold on the "hydrogen solution", being more viable, than the ever growing battery technology space, in the long run...but I guess time will tell, for cleaner hydrogen and said applications, that will use hydrogen.
Well written and gives a fair but glowing account of President Biden's stewardship, well worthy of being the [b]14th Best President in History![/b][/QUOTE]
Yeah, I can't imagine any reputable and credible Real News print, cable / network media or internet source endorsing Trump over Biden for President of the United States of America this time around.
Good lord, based on what numbers, easily observable reality, historical and current data and results, demeanor, behavior or any other important factor?
[b]I mean, what could they possibly cite as a decisive "positive" on Trump's side considering that as a Real News source they would have tracked all those factors throughout Biden's and Trump's entire public lives and can't pretend they didn't know that, on balance, Trump's were godawful for America while Biden's were clear net positives for America.[/b][/QUOTE]Yeah, on what earth, could they have come to any other conclusion and still call themselves journalists? I was just so surprised to see that it was a Texas based news source, I almost feel outta my chair.
-
He must give Trillions to the GOP.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2895867]"Man, are cult members of the MAGATea Party hopping mad about this:
Major Texas Newspaper Endorses Joe Biden.
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/houston-chronicle-endorse-biden-texas-trump-maga-1871423[/URL]
By all means, do read on. LOL. ".
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/bill-ackman-joe-biden-democrat/2024/02/21/id/1154385/[/URL][/QUOTE]LOL. From your link:
[QUOTE]"Nikki Haley, who I like and who I have supported, does not look like she's going to make it," he said. "Trump is really kind of running the table.[/QUOTE]So, Joe Biden, who on the demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics sites' Poll of Polls / Consensus has Biden and Trump in a statistical tie, rarely more than 2 percentage points apart, while neither of them has been officially declared his Party's Nominee and while Biden has been busy with a real job and has not even begun to campaign in earnest while Trump has even less to do today than the nothing he did as so-called potus, is "done".
But Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley or is it Nancy is practically 60 points behind Trump in the only race anyone is engaged in at the moment, the race for the Party Nomination, "does not look like she's going to make it. "
LOL. Wow. So perceptive. How did that numbskull become a billionaire? Win the lottery? It can't possibly have anything to do with basic math unless it is about which numbers to pick on his lottery tickets. LOL.
-
$450 million = $350 + $100 interests
I might be way off, but I have a hunch that DJT does not have the cash to put up for the appeal this case. I don't know if he can get a bond agency to represent him for this amount.
My reasoning is that most of his assets are illiquid that's why he asked for the 30 days extension, which has been denied. No one knows how much cash he has, but if it's under $300 million, he may get liquidated. We will all know in 30 days or so. 30-days starts when Judgement is signed off, which hasn't happened yet.
-
$450 Million in cash is no problem for Trump. Unless he was lying, of course. LOL
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2896055]I might be way off, but I have a hunch that DJT does not have the cash to put up for the appeal this case. I don't know if he can get a bond agency to represent him for this amount.
My reasoning is that most of his assets are illiquid that's why he asked for the 30 days extension, which has been denied. No one knows how much cash he has, but if it's under $300 million, he may get liquidated. We will all know in 30 days or so. 30-days starts when Judgement is signed off, which hasn't happened yet.[/QUOTE][B]How Trump's 'I'm rich!' boasts are coming back to bite him in court.
Feb. 2, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-wealth-rich-bragging-court-damage-verdicts-2024-2[/URL]
[QUOTE]Before its $83M verdict, the Carroll defamation jury watched Trump brag on tape about his wealth.
"We have a lot of cash," the jury watched Trump boast.
....
It was was as good as parading Trump before the jury with a "kick me" sign taped to his back.
"We have a lot of cash," Trump boasted in the clip that Carroll's jurors saw last Thursday morning.
"I believe we have substantially in excess of $400 million in cash, which is a lot for a developer," Trump bragged, leaning toward the camera from his seat at a conference table.
"Developers usually don't have cash," Trump eagerly went on. "We have, I believe, 400 plus, and going up very substantially every month."[/QUOTE]
-
Please finalize the nominations and bring on the Prez Debates.
These are the prepared and rehearsed responses to "the issues" that Do Nothing Repub candidate Trump has been repeating for months on the campaign trail while President Joe Biden has been busy with a real job, producing and presiding over the best Dem Recovery, Economic Expansion, Jobs Creation, Wage Growth, Inflation Reduction, Crime and Murder Reduction, Global Democracy-Strengthening, No USA Wars, Effective National Security presidential terms in history:
[B]Opinion: I watched a Trump rally so you dont have to. But you need to know what hes saying.
Feb. 22, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-02-22/michigan-donald-trump-election-rally-immigration-nikki-haley[/URL]
That is a MUST READ. LOL.
Meanwhile, after every Repub, Repub Voter, Pro Repub "Bothsider" and pro Repub Mainstream Media pundit and spinner has spent 4 years of free reign characterizing Joe Biden as an incoherent, brain-dead old codger incapable of rolling out of bed in the morning, as the Dem Nominee vs the Repub Nominee he will absolutely slaughter that Repub Numbskull on any and every presidential issue asked about by any unbiased moderator on any debate stage or televised interview Trump can't find a hiding place deep enough in his basement to avoid. LOL.
-
Floridians to pay Trump's legal bills...uhh!
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2896055]I might be way off, but I have a hunch that DJT does not have the cash to put up for the appeal this case. I don't know if he can get a bond agency to represent him for this amount.
My reasoning is that most of his assets are illiquid that's why he asked for the 30 days extension, which has been denied. No one knows how much cash he has, but if it's under $300 million, he may get liquidated. We will all know in 30 days or so. 30-days starts when Judgement is signed off, which hasn't happened yet.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2896078][b]$450 Million in cash is no problem for Trump. Unless he was lying, of course. LOL [/b]
[B]How Trump's 'I'm rich!' boasts are coming back to bite him in court.
Feb. 2, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-wealth-rich-bragging-court-damage-verdicts-2024-2[/URL][/QUOTE]
I'm waiting to see if the winger billionaires (ie. Elon Musk, Paul Singer and co.), are gullible enough, to show up and pay his legal fees, as some have suggested...kkkk!
But strangely enough, Florida Repubs, attempted to push a $5 million dollar legislative bill, to pay Trump's legal bills...Ouch!!! That was until DeStantis put the kibosh on it!
[b]Florida plan to have taxpayers pay Trumps legal bills...[/b]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/22/florida-trump-legal-bills-00136984[/URl]
Yep, there's a sucker born every second, in Trump world!
PS: You can bet New Yorkers, are LMAO, at Floridians...kkkk! (Good riddance, you can have the mob boss and crime family)
-
I hope Joe Biden wins another 4 years, you lot deserve him.
-
Thank you
[QUOTE=WayneRoberts;2896197]I hope Joe Biden wins another 4 years, you lot deserve him.[/QUOTE]That is one of the sweetest, most generous and considerate sentiments anyone has expressed here in a long time. We all needed that!
Much appreciated.
And all good blessings are wished for you and yours, too!
-
When kept, Trump / Repub voters are going to be very proud of this campaign promise.
[B]Man Facing 91 Felonies Vows To Bring 'Very Powerful Crime' To DC[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/02/man-facing-91-felonies-promises-bring-very[/URL]
[QUOTE]"No, we're going to take over Washington, D.C., we're going to federalize, we're going to have very powerful crime, and you're going to be proud of it again," Donald vowed.[/QUOTE]Surely, Fux News will devote an hour of primetime examining this demonstration of serious cognitive decline and impairment by the frontrunner candidate for a major Party presidential nomination.
Unless he really meant what he said, of course. In which case, shouldn't they still devote an hour of primetime to, you know, questioning why anyone would vote for such an outcome?
-
They're just pity parties, walked out on, half-way through...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2896116]These are the prepared and rehearsed responses to "the issues" that Do Nothing Repub candidate Trump has been repeating for months on the campaign trail while President Joe Biden has been busy with a real job, producing and presiding over the best Dem Recovery, Economic Expansion, Jobs Creation, Wage Growth, Inflation Reduction, Crime and Murder Reduction, Global Democracy-Strengthening, No USA Wars, Effective National Security presidential terms in history:
[B]Opinion: I watched a Trump rally so you dont have to. But you need to know what hes saying.
Feb. 22, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-02-22/michigan-donald-trump-election-rally-immigration-nikki-haley[/URL]
That is a MUST READ. LOL.
Meanwhile, after every Repub, Repub Voter, Pro Repub "Bothsider" and pro Repub Mainstream Media pundit and spinner has spent 4 years of free reign characterizing Joe Biden as an incoherent, brain-dead old codger incapable of rolling out of bed in the morning, as the Dem Nominee vs the Repub Nominee he will absolutely slaughter that Repub Numbskull on any and every presidential issue asked about by any unbiased moderator on any debate stage or televised interview Trump can't find a hiding place deep enough in his basement to avoid. LOL.[/QUOTE]Another great article!
[QUOTE]One thing there is more of than in the past, despite the kids in the audience: profanity. And more than ever, given the scores of criminal charges and mountain of legal penalties hes facing, there are his grievances. These arent rallies anymore. [b]They're pity parties.[/b] ...
...Instead, Trumps supporters emit constant catcalls, boos and their own favorite profanities, in approving response to his nonstop caterwauling.
[/QUOTE]Yep, to no one's surprise, it was [U]all about him[/U], never about what he or the Repubs, are going to do for the American people. No doubt why supporters are walking out of his diatribe, half-way through.
Call it for what it is, [B]"The Trump, (John Wick) Revenge Tour"[/B].
-
Il Duce
Mussolini was killed by a communist partisan, it has been reported, his body hung up, stoned and spat upon. Will the homegrown Stable Genius walk free, not before his minions finish off the Constitution?
-
[QUOTE=Beijing4987;2896336]Mussolini was killed by a communist partisan, it has been reported, his body hung up, stoned and spat upon. Will the homegrown Stable Genius walk free, not before his minions finish off the Constitution?[/QUOTE]Huh! Just occurred to me how much he actually resembles Mussolini from his rhetoric down to mannerism. Shit! Just watch some old videos. Uncanny!
-
Can democracy survive?
[QUOTE=Beijing4987;2896336]Mussolini was killed by a communist partisan, it has been reported, his body hung up, stoned and spat upon. Will the homegrown Stable Genius walk free, not before his minions finish off the Constitution?[/QUOTE] Author, Ruth Ben-Gihat's - "Strongmen". Mussolini to the present [Trump]. She does make similar comparisons and parallelisms, to the present incarnation. As for the Constitution, I think that will survive Trump/-ism.
But will democracy, the justice system and rule of law?
-
Ahem
[B]Donald Trump calls wife 'Melania Mercedes' during live CPAC speech.
Feb. 24, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/donald-trump-melania-wife-cpac-live-b2502010.html[/URL]#text=Former%20 president%20 Donald%20 Trump%20 called, how%20%E2%80%9 Cpeople%20 love%20 her%E2%80%9 the.
[QUOTE]Former president Donald Trump called Melania Mercedes as he praised his wife during a speech in Washington DC.
The crowd at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) gave the former First Lady a standing ovation as Mr Trump described how people love her.
[B]"Oh look at that Mercedes, thats pretty good",[/b] he said as the audience stood and applauded.
The GOP presidential hopeful was making the keynote speech on 24 February on the same day as voters head to the polls in the South Carolina primary.[/QUOTE]Uh.
Headlines on Fux News or Mainstream Media sources?
Nope.
Trump's handlers now give him written notes for him to focus on and read from when he is expected to introduce his wife, Melania.
Lolol.
Please finalize these primary elections, officially name Trump and Biden the Nominees and bring on the Presidential Debates!
-
Hunter Biden Repub Conspiracists...where are they now?
Hunter Biden, right-wing, Repub conspiracists, what's that now....crickets!!!
Not a peep out of our resident Repub Hunter Biden [i]"laptop dick picks"[/i], [i]"nihilist", "useful idiot"[/i] and local conspiracist, [b]aka.Elvis 2008[/b]
I wonder is that because the nihilists, insurrectionists and conspiracists pundits over at FOXY Muse, after weeks of regurgitating and spew lies and misinformation about Hunter Biden, from their so called "reliable", "noteworthy", "top-notch" "star-witness", "confidential human source", "trusted highly credible", FBI-informant ....[u]SUDDENLY[/u] have nothing to report, say, tell and/or lie about to their [b]gullible right-wing audience?[/b]
[QUOTE][b]Ex-FBI informant charged with lying about Bidens, arrested again[/b]
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/22/fbi-informant-biden-alexander-smirnov-arrest[/URL]
Prosecutors say Smirnov [b]falsely told[/b] his FBI handler that executives from the Ukrainian energy company Burisma paid Joe and Hunter Biden $5m each around 2015. The claim became central to the Republican impeachment inquiry of President Biden in Congress...[/QUOTE]
Week after week, ex-FBI informant, Alexander Smirnov, has been feeding gullible Repubs, Russian misinformation and disinformation on Hunter Biden and they in turn, they feed their right-wing partisan party-run propaganda machine over at FOXY Muse.
Both right-wing morally bankrupt and unscrupulous institutions, being what they are, have been "lapping-up" the "Russian State milk" disinformation, like a bunch of sad pussy-cats at milking time. They've turned into a bunch of [b]"useful idiots"[/b], Russian Gov't and State media, knew they would easily become.
Now their precious asset, is indicted on criminal charges, [b]not a peep[/b] from James Comer (R-KY) and Jim Jordan (R-OH) over in Repub world, or Sean Hannity and the other gullible but [b]"useful idiot"[/b] pundits over at Foxy Muse.
But not to worry, [i]all ye Repub faithless[/i], your [i][b]"useful idiots"[/b][/i] will no doubt, be back soon enough, doubling-down on Hunter Biden [i]"dick-picks"[/i], lies, misinformation and disinformation, from [i]"highly credible and trusted"[/i] [Russian] informants and naturally more empty promises, to impeach the Bidens.
-
They are now trying to avoid $787 Million in fines, Fresh Indictments or both.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2896809]Hunter Biden, right-wing, Repub conspiracists, what's that now....crickets!!!
Not a peep out of our resident Repub Hunter Biden [i]"laptop dick picks"[/i], [i]"nihilist", "useful idiot"[/i] and local conspiracist, [b]aka.Elvis 2008[/b]
I wonder is that because the nihilists, insurrectionists and conspiracists pundits over at FOXY Muse, after weeks of regurgitating and spew lies and misinformation about Hunter Biden, from their so called "reliable", "noteworthy", "top-notch" "star-witness", "confidential human source", "trusted highly credible", FBI-informant ....SUDDENLY have nothing to report, say, tell and/or lie about to their [b]gullible right-wing audience?[/b]
Week after week, ex-FBI informant, Alexander Smirnov, has been feeding gullible Repubs, Russian misinformation and disinformation on Hunter Biden and they in turn, they feed their right-wing partisan party-run propaganda machine over at FOXY Muse.
Both right-wing morally bankrupt and unscrupulous institutions, being what they are, have been "lapping-up" the "Russian State milk" disinformation, like a bunch of sad pussy-cats at milking time. They've turned into a bunch of [b]"useful idiots"[/b], Russian Gov't and State media, knew they would easily become.
Now their precious asset, is indicted on criminal charges, [b]not a peep[/b] from James Comer (R-KY) and Jim Jordan (R-OH) over in Repub world, or Sean Hannity and the other gullible but [b]"useful idiot"[/b] pundits over at Foxy Muse.
But not to worry, [i]all ye Repub faithless[/i], your [i][b]"useful idiots"[/b][/i] will no doubt, be back soon enough, doubling-down on Hunter Biden [i]"dick-picks"[/i], lies, misinformation and disinformation, from [i]"highly credible and trusted"[/i] Russian informants and naturally more empty promises, to impeach the Bidens.[/QUOTE]Now that it has been exposed that the well-established, long-term deep and intense America-hating collusion between Russia and Trump / Team Trump naturally extends to a deep and intense America-hating collusion between Russia and the entire Republican Party as well as Fux News, Newsmax, Breitbart and all the other Repub sides of it, anyone who repeats the lies Russia had been shovel-feeding Repubs down their throats so they will dutifully vomit it back out to the American public risks either settling out of court in a panic for at least $787 Million or being indicted for Aiding and Abetting Russian Interference of America's Free and Fair Elections or both.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2896831]Now that it has been exposed that the well-established, long-term deep and intense America-hating collusion between Russia and Trump / Team Trump naturally extends to a deep and intense America-hating collusion between Russia and the entire Republican Party as well as Fux News, Newsmax, Breitbart and all the other Repub sides of it, anyone who repeats the lies Russia had been shovel-feeding Repubs down their throats so they will dutifully vomit it back out to the American public risks either settling out of court in a panic for at least $787 Million or being indicted for Aiding and Abetting Russian Interference of America's Free and Fair Elections or both.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/rachel-maddow-mike-johnson-praising-034853028.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email[/URL]
[URL]https://twitter.com/PoliticusSarah/status/1759769909154746565?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1759769909154746565%7Ctwgr%5Ea4005f7a37918f363ea65640abdeda043d85f715%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.yahoo.com%2Fentertainment%2Frachel-maddow-mike-johnson-praising-034853028.html[/URL]
Walter Kirn: Anyway, so having been through the first round of this when it was Pat Robertson's bailiwick, it's now Rachel Maddow who preaches fire and brimstone.
Rachel Maddow: You are not hallucinating, that was two senior Republicans, including the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, praising the Biden administration, saying how much they trust them and value them to deal with what was first reported last week as an emerging national security threat, of Russia trying to put satellite killer nuclear weapons in orbit around the Earth up in space.
Matt Taibbi: You would think there would be, oh, well, Russia's going to be nuking our satellites, so let's have classes in remedial talking face-to-face, this is the USA Postal System, this is what a stamp is. But all this stuff is just so patently absurd. It's been manifestly clear to Americans, since, what, the early '50's, that mutually assured destruction is something that we have to live with on a daily basis. We've known this, we've known that accidental apocalypse is entirely possible, and we're not asked to worry about that, we're asked to worry about this new weapon system that has not even been deployed, and no one has even confirmed the existence of yet. Because why exactly? I don't fully understand. It's clearly connected somehow to trying to get the aid bill passed, the $95 billion aid bill passed.
Walter Kirn: So if Ukraine prevails, if Ukraine repels the invader, does that mean there won't be any space nuke? Will they give up on that?
Matt Taibbi: That's right. How do you connect those dots, right?
Walter Kirn: Or is it more likely, if we put Russia in a corner, may they perhaps accelerate their Dr. Evil plans to knock out all communications around the world? Let's sit back and see the chess board, Rachel.
Matt Taibbi: And, you know, the way people's brains work now is, "Oh, yeah, I heard that. " Right? In other words, once something echoes around long enough, there's a consensus kernel of something that gets into people's minds; and it's a lot of work to extract that, which I think is at the root of a lot of these problems.
Walter Kirn: Oh, dude. I think we've proved that Russia-Gate will never. The notion of Donald Trump, Putin's instrument, will never be extracted from the American brain; and certainly not from about half of the American brain. It just won't be. It was a permanent reality implant.
Walter Kirn: Yeah. Basically, they moved to a level of desperation last week. And as we've said, the space nuke thing is a lot like the National Lampoon, buy this magazine or we'll shoot this puppy.
Matt Taibbi: Right. Right. Yes. Best magazine cover of all time.
Walter Kirn: Yeah. Pass this bill, or space nukes will take out modern life, and the Kessler Syndrome will usher you into eternal darkness. Okay? Does it get any more grave than that?
Matt Taibbi: But National Lampoon was always picking on the kind of absurd over expressions in the American media culture. But that's gone now.
Apart from us, who's really doing that? I mean, who's doing this except for people who are outside the conventional media space? You can't do that. You can't pick on this stuff anymore, which is amazing. Even during the Iraq period, we had the Daily Show, which did pick on both parties, more of the Bush side. That's all gone. There's no satire of this. This is supposed to be our official reality. We're supposed to believe it.
Walter Kirn: Matt, it's even worse. It's not all gone. The Daily Show's back. Jon Stewart is on the air again.
Matt Taibbi: Oh, I know.
Walter Kirn: Except it's the new toothless, defanged, fake Jon Stewart, who isn't making fun of war drums anymore like he used to, but dancing along to them.
Matt Taibbi: I know. I know.
Walter Kirn: As they all are.
Matt Taibbi: It's along with Stephen Colbert, who might as well be wearing epaulets from the special DARPA media squad. I don't know how they expect that people are going to subsist without comic relief, without doubt, skepticism. They think that that's the problem.
Matt Taibbi: And this is another thing that's been hard. It's a new thing. I mean, it's not a new thing, but it's a consistent feature of the stories about this phenomenon, that if when you start to see polls, for instance, about people wanting to discontinue funding or favoring negotiations, these are described as pro-Russian views everywhere. And it becomes this inescapable thing, where if you have any opinion that deviates from this narrative, if you even want to bring up the true but unhelpful, right this malinformation, then you are on the wrong side.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2896831]Now that it has been exposed that the well-established, long-term deep and intense America-hating collusion between Russia and Trump / Team Trump naturally extends to a deep and intense America-hating collusion between Russia and the entire Republican Party as well as Fux News, Newsmax, Breitbart and all the other Repub sides of it, anyone who repeats the lies Russia had been shovel-feeding Repubs down their throats[/QUOTE]It is a fact that Biden and his administration were dead set against Russia operating the Nordstream pipelines. If you had a working brain, you would recall Trump condemning the Germans over accepting Russian natural gas via these pipelines as well. Biden even says those pipelines will be shut down one way or another. The invasion of Ukraine occurs and the pipelines are blown up.
Even though Biden has said he would take out the pipelines, the administration floats out the ridiculous notion that Russia blew up its own pipeline. Seymour Hersch writes an article in exhaustive detail about how the pipelines were blow up by American special forces. He is mocked but no one dares to sue him.
There is UN proposal to investigate the pipeline. Russia could veto the investigation, but they don't. Who does? The USA.
So it is pretty obvious to me the USA blew up the pipelines. Hell, Biden himself said he would.
Putin is asked by Tucker Carlson who blew up the pipelines. Instead of saying the USA, he jokes and says to Tucker Carlson "you did". Then he goes into the issue and does not mention the USA by name. He says look into who said they would destroy the pipeline and who is capable of doing it.
The American military industrial complex has been sounding warning alarms about China. Tucker Carlson asked about Putin about China, a nation it has a huge border with, and he says we are not worried about them at all.
So my question to you Tooms is one of clarification. When you mention this America-hating collusion between Russia and Trump / Team Trump, you mean the American military industrial complex that staged a terrorist attack and an act of war against Russia right and wants to drain our resources with perpetual wars? That must be the America you mean and if so, I completely agree with your POV.
-
Elvis is smart
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2896831]Now that it has been exposed that the well-established, long-term deep and intense America-hating collusion between Russia and Trump / Team Trump naturally extends to a deep and intense America-hating collusion between Russia and the entire Republican Party as well as Fux News, Newsmax, Breitbart and all the other Repub sides of it, anyone who repeats the lies Russia had been shovel-feeding Repubs down their throats so they will dutifully vomit it back out to the American public risks either settling out of court in a panic for at least $787 Million or being indicted for Aiding and Abetting Russian Interference of America's Free and Fair Elections or both.[/QUOTE]And by that I mean street smart. He knows how this bullshit works.
He's just waiting until this yet another thunderous scandal dies down, and then-.
He'LL BE BACK (in Arnold's voice), as if nothing has ever happened with yet another breitbart / newsmax / rt invented fiction to steer some more shit.
Not his first rodeo, LOL.
-
Oh that's an easy one.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2896936]It is a fact that Biden and his administration were dead set against Russia operating the Nordstream pipelines. If you had a working brain, you would recall Trump condemning the Germans over accepting Russian natural gas via these pipelines as well. Biden even says those pipelines will be shut down one way or another. The invasion of Ukraine occurs and the pipelines are blown up.
Even though Biden has said he would take out the pipelines, the administration floats out the ridiculous notion that Russia blew up its own pipeline. Seymour Hersch writes an article in exhaustive detail about how the pipelines were blow up by American special forces. He is mocked but no one dares to sue him.
There is UN proposal to investigate the pipeline. Russia could veto the investigation, but they don't. Who does? The USA.
So it is pretty obvious to me the USA blew up the pipelines. Hell, Biden himself said he would.
Putin is asked by Tucker Carlson who blew up the pipelines. Instead of saying the USA, he jokes and says to Tucker Carlson "you did". Then he goes into the issue and does not mention the USA by name. He says look into who said they would destroy the pipeline and who is capable of doing it.
The American military industrial complex has been sounding warning alarms about China. Tucker Carlson asked about Putin about China, a nation it has a huge border with, and he says we are not worried about them at all.
So my question to you Tooms is one of clarification. When you mention this America-hating collusion between Russia and Trump / Team Trump, you mean the American military industrial complex that staged a terrorist attack and an act of war against Russia right and wants to drain our resources with perpetual wars? That must be the America you mean and if so, I completely agree with your POV.[/QUOTE]The answer to that question has been documented by Repub vs Dem policy results for the past 100 Years:
The America that Repubs and Russians alike hate is the one where free and fair elections are honored, historic job gains, wage increases, effective national security is achieved, the debt and deficit are kept under control, the government isn't crawling into our bedrooms trying to control our private lives, Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction are unheard of, "Once in 100 Years Disasters" actually do only occur maybe once in 100 Years and not Once In Every Repub Presidency, etc.
Neither Russia nor Repubs can tolerate such an outcome for America. Russia's most obvious expression and demonstration of their hatred for it is its exclusive collusion with the Repub Party to help them win elections and the Repub Party's most obvious expression and demonstration of that same hatred is its loving embrace of Kremlin collusion with them and Trump's ongoing public fellating of his Puppet Master Putin.
BTW, nobody gives a fuck about blaming America for some oil pipeline casualty due entirely to Putin's spectacularly stupid War of Putin's Choice Against Ukraine. Obviously, not even Putin.
-
SC Trumpers punked & pranked by Jimmy Kimmel...
Jimmy Kimmel, punks the Trump supporters in South Carolina, and highlights their hypocrisy.
[URL]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/debate-and-switch-jimmy-kimmel-gets-trump-supporters-to-reveal-blatant-hypocrisy-in-wild-segment/ar-BB1iRNLa[/URL]
or
[URL]https://www.tiktok.com/@krislknight/video/7339553152326241578 [/URL]
Too funny! The hypocrisy is so thick, you could almost cut it with a knife! (...kkkk!)
PS: Or search/Google: "Jimmy Kimmel South Carolina" (Sorry at posting, I didn't find a YouTube video version)
-
So True
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2897007]The answer to that question has been documented by Repub vs Dem policy results for the past 100 Years:
The America that Repubs and Russians alike hate is the one where free and fair elections are honored, historic job gains, wage increases, effective national security is achieved, the debt and deficit are kept under control, the government isn't crawling into our bedrooms trying to control our private lives, Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction are unheard of, "Once in 100 Years Disasters" actually do only occur maybe once in 100 Years and not Once In Every Repub Presidency, etc.
Neither Russia nor Repubs can tolerate such an outcome for America. Russia's most obvious expression and demonstration of their hatred for it is its exclusive collusion with the Repub Party to help them win elections and the Repub Party's most obvious expression and demonstration of that same hatred is its loving embrace of Kremlin collusion with them and Trump's ongoing public fellating of his Puppet Master Putin.
BTW, nobody gives a fuck about blaming America for some oil pipeline casualty due entirely to Putin's spectacularly stupid War of Putin's Choice Against Ukraine. Obviously, not even Putin.[/QUOTE]Putin playing the victim after starting the war is aburd to say the least.
P.S. I'm not sure what all the Repub historic and cataclysmic Great Depressions, famines, massive job destructions, and other apocalytpic disasters beginning with Lincoln in continuity until now has to do with anything. Then again I suppose that can be shoe horned in about anywhere.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2897007]
The America that Repubs and Russians alike hate is the one where free and fair elections are honored, historic job gains, wage increases, effective national security is achieved, the debt and deficit are kept under control, the government isn't crawling into our bedrooms trying to control our private lives.[/QUOTE]LOL. I would ask what country do you live in as an insult, but you live in Thailand not the USA. Yes, what love you show for your country but taking off to a cheaper destination then sticking around and fixing the mess you created.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2897007]BTW, nobody gives a fuck about blaming America for some oil pipeline casualty due entirely to Putin's spectacularly stupid War of Putin's Choice Against Ukraine. Obviously, not even Putin.[/QUOTE]You are mad as a hatter on this one. No doubt your fellow Democratic douches line up with you on this one. You are alone with your Democratic douches in thinking that your beloved president engaged in an illegal and disgusting act of terror that could have led to WW3 and a nuclear one at that is "nobody giving a fuck".
And the USA is okay in engaging in terror because Russia did it first? I swear to God you Democratic douches still think Russiagate was true and the years of incessant media coverage on the issue was not a complete waste of time. Then there was Covid and antivaxxers. I have not heard the antivaxxer term in a while. Were you guys right about the vaccines? You douches are still so stupid you think that everyone forgot about that. Covid? What is that? A kind of fruit?
And now the completely innocent Ukraine being attacked by Russia narrative is the next Democratic douche narrative to fall. Here is the new news:
Over the weekend the New York Times published an epic expos. The Spy War: How the see. I. A. Secretly Helps Ukraine Fight Putin.
The listening post in the Ukrainian forest is part of a see. I. A. -supported network of spy bases constructed in the past eight years that includes 12 secret locations along the Russian border.
Yowza! Officials have long scolded the public that even minor disclosures of "sources and methods" could "risk lives" and must be prevented at all costs. Yet here comes the Times, helping "current and former officials in Ukraine, the United States and Europe" blab a long list of extraordinary details, down to the number of CIA-supported secret bases along the Russian border.
When intelligence sources line up by the hundred to fill newspapers with "secret" details, they're almost always doing one of two things: spreading disinformation, or "pre-bunking" embarrassing future revelations. The lavishly overwritten "secret untold story" that puts advance spin on ugly leaks has become a popular genre across this century's many giant intelligence screwups.
In the case of this new Ukraine story, apart from the self-serving history re-writes (the idea that CIA-Ukraine cooperation started with a cold call on Valentine's Day, 2014 is high comedy), certain details jump out. Although on the surface the Times depicts a heroic partnership against Russian perfidy, it contains an un-subtle leitmotif about civilized America continually begging Ukrainians to lay off atrocities. As the partnership deepened "after 2016," the Times reports, Ukrainians "began staging assassinations and other lethal operations, which violated the terms the White House thought the Ukrainians had agreed to. " Americans were "infuriated" and "threatened to cut off support," but never did. Shocked, shocked!
Future defense intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov led a commando raid into Crimea that killed "several Russian fighters, including the son of a general," a "disaster" that prompted a wigged-out Barack Obama to push for shutting the partnership down. The theme of Ukrainians free-lancing the bloody stuff (especially before the war) is prominent. Also noticeable: the bulk of the article's detailed revelations come from the Brennan era, and Brennan is to an almost humorous degree the hero of the article, displaying Atlas-like resolve, reining in Ukrainian savages on one side of the world while keeping the pusillanimous Obama from losing his nerve on the other.
One last note. When Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, academics like John Mearsheimer were blasted for saying the crisis was the West's "fault," and for writing things like:
Since the mid-1990's, Russian leaders have adamantly opposed enlargement and in recent years, they have made it clear that they would not stand by while their strategically important neighbor turned into a Western bastion.
Two years later we're hearing much the same thing from intelligence sources, who tell the Times of a clandestine partnership that involved secret border bases and "transformed Ukraine. Into one of Washington's most important intelligence partners against the Kremlin. " It doesn't justify invasion, but it does poke holes in initial hysteria against acknowledging the depth of the USA -Ukraine strategic partnership. We were told something different two years ago.
The Ukrainian people suffered terribly in the last two years, but if that $61 billion doesn't pass, the priorities of America's Ukraine hawks will shift quickly. In Washington, there's no time like ass-covering time, and the season may be upon us already. End of link.
And here we ago again with the douche who keeps on giving: John Brennan former CIA director, the architect of Russiagate. He is pointing fingers already saying It wasn't me. It was those crazy Ukrainians. Maybe we should have done a little more vetting before calling them heroes and pouring billions in their pockets. The Democratic party-CIA-Ukraine alliance looks like it is going to dissolve and quickly.
As for Russia and the Republican party having an alliance, that is a fucking joke. It speaks volumes about how partisan and stupid our intelligence agencies have gotten that I trust Putin is telling the truth more than the CIA. That is what you get after Russiagate, Hunter Biden's laptop being Russian disinformation, and the so called innocent Ukrainians. That does not mean Putin is good. It means that is how full of shit the intelligence agencies and Democrats have become.
How about spending money to build stuff versus money to blow shit up? If that is the essence of the Russia-Republican collusion, then I am all for it.
-
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2897232]Putin playing the victim after starting the war is aburd to say the least.
P.S. I'm not sure what all the Repub historic and cataclysmic Great Depressions, famines, massive job destructions, and other apocalytpic disasters beginning with Lincoln in continuity until now has to do with anything. Then again I suppose that can be shoe horned in about anywhere.[/QUOTE]That was in response to. Elvis' question:
"So my question to you Tooms is one of clarification. When you mention this America-hating collusion between Russia and Trump / Team Trump, you mean the American military industrial complex that staged a terrorist attack and an act of war against Russia right and wants to drain our resources with perpetual wars? That must be the America you mean and if so, I completely agree with your POV. ".
I don't see how my answer regarding the Repub Party's historic results for the country going back 100 years being precisely the same as those wished for by Putin / Russia shoe-horns my point into it rather than addresses it directly.
100 years would take it back to 1924, not to Lincoln's presidency.
Putin / Russia could not have wished for better results for America than the Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Job Destruction that Repub policies and stewardship produced ever since then along with none of the opposite historic boom times and jobs creation.
And since at least 2016 they have not wanted to risk merely "wishing" for it. They have decided shovel-feeding their anti-Dem / anti-America talking points down the lovingly receptive throats of pro Repub media, Repub candidates and Repub elected officials to be enthusiasticslly vomited back out to the American electorate provides much more certainty of a cozy, deep and intense collusion with their America-hating Repub comrades already residing within America's borders.
Why only "wish" for it when they've got Trump, Tucker, Fux, Newsmax, Breitbart, virtually every Repub in Congress and the Repub voting base ready, willing and eager to make that wish their command for the low low price of simply providing them the words and suggested methods?
-
My positive contributions to America far surpass yours and Trump's.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2897247]LOL. I would ask what country do you live in as an insult, but you live in Thailand not the USA. Yes, what love you show for your country but taking off to a cheaper destination then sticking around and fixing the mess you created.
You are mad as a hatter on this one. No doubt your fellow Democratic douches line up with you on this one. You are alone with your Democratic douches in thinking that your beloved president engaged in an illegal and disgusting act of terror that could have led to WW3 and a nuclear one at that is "nobody giving a fuck".
And the USA is okay in engaging in terror because Russia did it first? I swear to God you Democratic douches still think Russiagate was true and the years of incessant media coverage on the issue was not a complete waste of time. Then there was Covid and antivaxxers. I have not heard the antivaxxer term in a while. Were you guys right about the vaccines? You douches are still so stupid you think that everyone forgot about that. Covid? What is that? A kind of fruit?.[/QUOTE]I pay every USA dollar of the taxes I owe and vote straight Democrat down every ballot in every election I am legally entitled to vote in.
Those two efforts alone far, far, far surpass anything positive Trump, the Repubs in Congress and every Repub voter has ever done for America.
And, yep, I have managed to provide more positive benefits for America allll the way around the globe than any Repub Voter anywhere inside or outside of America. Significantly more than anyone who ever voted for Trump, of course.
You're welcome.
-
Hunch confirmed.
Guess he doesn't have the money after all.
After 30 day of when the judgement was official, February 23,2024, the NY AG can go to the court enforce the judgement and seize assets up to the $454 million plus $111 K per day of interests. Unless, in the next 3 weeks, he can raise the other $354 million through sneakers, NFTs, RNC, Save America Pac, "friends" or bond agency, AG James will have fire sales of properties.
Listed sources you can read up on it. Fox News did not mention this story, so sorry I couldn't include it.
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/28/trump-appeal-bond-fraud-case[/URL]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/02/28/trump-lawyers-plan-to-post-100-million-bond-in-ny-fraud-appeal.html[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/28/nyregion/trump-bond-civil-fraud.html[/URL]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/28/politics/donald-trump-appeals-court-new-york/index.html[/URL]
[URL]https://www.scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/3253578/donald-trump-cant-post-full-bond-new-york-fraud-case-offers-us100-million[/URL]
[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2024/02/28/trump-asks-appeals-court-to-pause-454-million-fraud-payment/?sh=60eb3ff212dc[/URL]
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/us/donald-trump-bond-civil/2024/02/28/id/1155292/[/URL]
-
A case for Lara Trump as RNC Co-Chair?
Would that be a big "YES" for you as it is for me?
Consider the following:[LIST]YES, to another Trump, at the head of another Repub organization, at the ready to turn it to shit.[/LIST][LIST]YES, to yet another Trump grift, as Lara Trump, gleefully and commandingly tells Repub/MAGA world, that the RNC donor monies and coffers, will be going to fund "Trumps 2024 campaign" aka. Trump's legal bills and legal fees.[/LIST][LIST]YES, to this RNC grift, siphoning off money by the Trumps, thereby leaving nothing (or very little) for other Repubs running for Senate, House, state, gubernatorial, mayoral...etc, candidacies around the country.[/LIST][LIST]YES to [b]no money[/B] for support of other Repubs campaigns, down ballot.[/LIST][LIST]YES to more "loyalists" being [I]"thrown under the bus",[/I] in Ronna 'Romney' McDaniel (...so much for loyalty...kkk!)
AND[/LIST][LIST]Vote YES for Lara Trump for RNC Co-Chair! (For a [b]new RNC,[/b] that promises and [b]vows to bring chaos, grifting and thuggery to a RNC chapter near you![/b])[/LIST]P.S.: All this seems very on par for the autocrat and wanna be dictator. Even on queue, as he stalls yet another family member into the right-wing Repub apparatus.
Repubs, [b]embrace the chaos[/b], about to unfold!
-
Speaks volumes indeed!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2897247]
As for Russia and the Republican party having an alliance, that is a fucking joke. It speaks volumes about how partisan and stupid our intelligence agencies have gotten that I trust Putin is telling the truth more than the CIA.[/QUOTE]What a brilliant argument (Not if a fella (let's call him – I don't know – Evil S) believes quacks, charlatans, and hoodwinkers more than scientists, doctors, and other trained professionals -- that's not the fault of said professionals. That's Evil S being a moron and a loser.
On the same token, if Evil admits trusting mortal enemies of his country more than security agencies protecting his country, that makes him a useful idiot (in addition to having already classified himself as a moron and a loser).
Of course, being a moron and an idiot would prevent Mr. S from realizing how idiotic and illogical his arguments are, so he won't shy away from posting his musings.
Which he should've to avoid being ridiculed, but alas.
-
Is IVF the next "nail" in the coffin for Repubs?
Like the devastating results of abortion bans that are affecting successful wins for the Repubs in the 2020, 2022 and 2023 Elections (all thanks to Trump [i]"I was able to KILL Roe v Wade"[/i]), will IVF be next nail in the Repub 2024 Election coffin? For the presidency and well as down ballot?
Since DOBBS overturned Roe v. Wade, sending nationwide abortion back to the states, Repubs have;[LIST]
--pushed abortion ban in red states, but with an eye on nationwide bans
--denied an individuals the right to end an unwanted pregnancy
--denied a women the right to end a pregnancy, if her life is in imminent danger
--denied in general, women's reproductive rights
--denied women's health care in red states?
--denied doctors, their rights to administer proper health care, in pregnancy complications
--banned calls for the nationwide ban of the Mifepristone, abortion pill. Trump appointed, right-wing TX Judge has case before the Supreme Court to decide the drug's fate
AND now have:
--denied families their right to have children thru IVF (In vitro fertilization)
--denied access to IVF clinics in red states, as IVF clinics shutdown and contemplate their future, before an Alabama court ruling, on if embryos are "children"?
--denied families the right to IVF health care and monetary compensation for the thousands of dollars spent on IVF treatment. [LIST]As onset trauma fills the women and families that are suffering from the Alabama IVF ruling, these families in red states, are rushing to move their [b]IVF eggs to safer blue state IVF clinics,[/b] in fear of their red state following Alabama.
After spending countless hours and thousands and thousands of dollars preparing for IVF, Only be told a day before their procedures are cancelled, their dreams of having of adding to their family union, are put on hold, if not shattered.[/LIST][b]Note:[/b] Repub ex-Vice Pres. Mike Pence, had the good fortune of using IVF to add to the his family union. Interview November 20, 2022: [URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mike-pence-fertility-treatments-ivf-supreme-court-face-the-nation/[/URL][/LIST]So as Repubs, again twist themselves into more pretzels, trying to [b][i]"shuck and jive"[/i][/b] their way out of [u]voting against IVF on record[/u] (or even allow a vote to protect IVF), but yet lie in public about supporting IVF (ie. Nancy Mace [R-SC]), like the hypocrites they are.
Hopefully, this sends a clear message to American families, that [b]Repubs can't be trusted on "family values"[/b] and should also vote accordingly down ballot, there by driving another nail in the proverbial coffin of the Repubs.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2897007] The America that Repubs and Russians alike hate is the one where free and fair elections are honored, historic job gains, wage increases, effective national security is achieved, the debt and deficit are kept under control, [b]the government isn't [u]crawling into our bedrooms[/u] trying to control our private lives. ...[/b][/QUOTE]
Next up on their minority Christian Right/Evangelical agenda and Repub/MAGA docket, is good ol' [b]contraception[/b] and what some of the devout call [b]"recreational sex"[/b], as opposed to what, I'm not really sure.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2897502]What a brilliant argument (Not if a fella (let's call him I don't know Evil S) believes quacks, charlatans, and hoodwinkers more than scientists, doctors, and other trained professionals -- that's not the fault of said professionals. That's Evil S being a moron and a loser.
On the same token, if Evil admits trusting mortal enemies of his country more than security agencies protecting his country, that makes him a useful idiot (in addition to having already classified himself as a moron and a loser).
Of course, being a moron and an idiot would prevent Mr. S from realizing how idiotic and illogical his arguments are, so he won't shy away from posting his musings.
Which he should've to avoid being ridiculed, but alas.[/QUOTE]The fact that currently many in our institutions are Trump appointees, or the fact that Putin is an obvious liar and serial killer that habitually interferes in US elections makes no difference to them. They've put themselves in an information vacuum where they are indoctrinated and inoculated. In the latter case they are told that other news sources are part of some "deep state" or "globalist" conspiracy. They no more listen to the opposition than any other cult member in the world. They've been around at least since the 90's, as I used to listen to them on shortwave radio. Then shockingly they won the WH in 2016.
Political discussions with the hardcore ones are a waste of time. All you can do is beat them at polls. Make sure you show up, and take as many people with you as you can.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2897502]
On the same token, if Evil admits trusting mortal enemies of his country more than security agencies protecting his country, that makes him a useful idiot (in addition to having already classified himself as a moron and a loser).
Of course, being a moron and an idiot would prevent Mr. S from realizing how idiotic and illogical his arguments are, so he won't shy away from posting his musings.
Which he should've to avoid being ridiculed, but alas.[/QUOTE]I always wondered how you guys claim to love our country so much when it hates you and what you do with your money so much. There is a video of a guy running a brothel agency in the USA here: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9kQuy90OGM[/URL].
I watch the video and it is scary at the end. When he got busted, I think to myself something like this could happen to me. In his book, he mentions that prosecutors did not even give him discovery. It was disgusting, as bad as our legal system can be. It is rare to even have jury trials anymore. If they have to work and could possibly lose, the prosecution will throw the book at you. In the ultimate hypocrisy, people at the district attorney's office were actually clients of this brothel owner.
In the mean time, paying for sex in Russia is no big deal. I know someone who spent a year in Russia and said the women there think having sex is almost like getting a handshake. Abortions were easy to get, and the women did not have the victim mindset. The concept of a woman getting half while doing nothing in a marriage does not exist there. Taxes are low, and Russia does not have near the debt the USA does.
Why are you so convinced the government who hates you and wants to throw you in jail is your friend and the one who wants to leave you be is your enemy? And then I realized that is because you are a narcissist. In your fucked up head, you have convinced yourself the government does not hate you. They hate guys like Elvis. They do not hate me. They love me.
I knew after the AIDS fiasco to not trust government. The whole concept of safe sex and condom use and AIDS prevention with heterosexual sex was so the CDC could rake in the bucks. That was exposed. In your mind, Xpartan, you think everyone in the CDC marched in lockstep with that call when that was hardly the case. The CDC scared heterosexuals to get more funding and it worked.
If you are such a fan of government and they tell you it is wrong to pay for sex, why do you do it?
How as a man let alone a monger can you be cheering on the $85 million verdict against Trump in this absolute bullshit fake rape case? Because he is the enemy? Oh right, I forgot. You think government loves you.
I was at the Fort Lauderdale airport and there is this nonstop PSA blaring every 30 minutes about human trafficking. I shake my head. Welcome to the USA. But Xpartan, you think when they mention human trafficking they are talking about people other than you. Remember this was the city where Robert Kraft went to an AMP and got a rub and tug and the prosecution tried to say he was promoting trafficking. So they will go after Robert Kraft but not you?
What me so suspicious of you guys is you should be cheering Trump on. The "grab them by the pussy" comment was basically saying that women will fuck men for fame just as much as for money. He fucked porn stars and was married three times.
So why the hate for Trump and such love for organizations like the CDC? Besides the narcissism, I think you guys have to be getting paid off with some kind of government check. At least I hope you have been.
And for the record, the pandemic ended not because of the CDC or Biden; it ended when people realized the government was lying.
And speaking of lying, you have not gotten a Covid booster in the last year. You would rather lie than admit you were wrong, but the biggest lie is one you tell yourself. You have convinced your government loves you.
-
Yes, the Repub's Decades Long War on Sex For Pleasure and Reproductive Righ Continues
[QUOTE=Spidy;2897547]Like the devastating results of abortion bans that are affecting successful wins for the Repubs in the 2020, 2022 and 2023 Elections (all thanks to Trump [i]"I was able to KILL Roe v Wade"[/i]), will IVF be next nail in the Repub 2024 Election coffin? For the presidency and well as down ballot?
Since DOBBS overturned Roe v. Wade, sending nationwide abortion back to the states, Repubs have;
--pushed abortion ban in red states, but with an eye on nationwide bans
--denied an individuals the right to end an unwanted pregnancy
--denied a women the right to end a pregnancy, if her life is in imminent danger
--denied in general, women's reproductive rights
--denied women's health care in red states?
--denied doctors, their rights to administer proper health care, in pregnancy complications
--banned calls for the nationwide ban of the Mifepristone, abortion pill. Trump appointed, right-wing TX Judge has case before the Supreme Court to decide the drug's fate
AND now have:
--denied families their right to have children thru IVF (In vitro fertilization)
--denied access to IVF clinics in red states, as IVF clinics shutdown and contemplate their future, before an Alabama court ruling, on if embryos are "children"?
--denied families the right to IVF health care and monetary compensation for the thousands of dollars spent on IVF treatment. [LIST]As onset trauma fills the women and families that are suffering from the Alabama IVF ruling, these families in red states, are rushing to move their [b]IVF eggs to safer blue state IVF clinics,[/b] in fear of their red state following Alabama.
After spending countless hours and thousands and thousands of dollars preparing for IVF, Only be told a day before their procedures are cancelled, their dreams of having of adding to their family union, are put on hold, if not shattered.[/LIST][b]Note:[/b] Repub ex-Vice Pres. Mike Pence, had the good fortune of using IVF to add to the his family union. Interview November 20, 2022: [URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mike-pence-fertility-treatments-ivf-supreme-court-face-the-nation/[/URL][/LIST]So as Repubs, again twist themselves into more pretzels, trying to [b][i]"shuck and jive"[/i][/b] their way out of [u]voting against IVF on record[/u] (or even allow a vote to protect IVF), but yet lie in public about supporting IVF (ie. Nancy Mace [R-SC]), like the hypocrites they are.
Hopefully, this sends a clear message to American families, that [b]Repubs can't be trusted on "family values"[/b] and should also vote accordingly down ballot, there by driving another nail in the proverbial coffin of the Repubs.
Next up on their minority Christian Right/Evangelical agenda and Repub/MAGA docket, is good ol' [b]contraception[/b] and what some of the devout call [b]"recreational sex"[/b], as opposed to what, I'm not really sure.[/QUOTE]Bear in mind that the Repubs' decades long War On Sex For Pleasure And Reproductive Rights at this stage appears to be heading toward banning "chemical" methods of contraception, the kinds that were invented and developed by scientists so as not to reduce the pleasure that human beings experience while engaging in Real Sex / BBFS+CIP.
Never fear, condom-lovers, the famously anti-science Repub Party has not yet eyed access and use of condoms or any other method of contraception that could easily have been invented and developed by blacksmiths and wood-carvers rather than scientists.
-
Don't Let the Door Hit you in the Ass
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2897713]
In the mean time, paying for sex in Russia is no big deal. I know someone who spent a year in Russia and said the women there think having sex is almost like getting a handshake. Abortions were easy to get, and the women did not have the victim mindset. The concept of a woman getting half while doing nothing in a marriage does not exist there. Taxes are low, and Russia does not have near the debt the USA does.[/QUOTE]I still don't see why people like you, Tucker Carlson, and Nick Fuentes don't put your money where you mouth is and move to Russia. Could be because you don't want to live in a dark dictatorship where the slightest dissent can put you in a frozen penal colony for 20 years, if by chance you could last that long. You might also enjoy features like the right to assemble, due process of law, and all that goes with living in a country with over seven times the average monthly salary of Russia. There's also no reason for you to put up with an underfunded and poor performing Russian healthcare system as you age, and the list can go on, while we are left to wonder why the Russian oligarchs always send their children to the feminist Western Euro countries to live. This while they often move there themselves. No, it's far more practical for you to live, breathe, and ***** from the safe confines of the US. Our rights apply to most everyone, even you.
P.S. If you are for reproductive freedom the first thing you can do is stop voting Republican, a statement of the obvious I know.
-
Speaking of Repubs, taking Americans back to the dark ages, SCOTUS is...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2897731]Bear in mind that the [b]Repubs' decades long War On Sex For Pleasure And Reproductive Rights[/b] at this stage appears to be heading toward banning "chemical" methods of contraception, the kinds that were invented and developed by scientists so as not to reduce the pleasure that human beings experience while engaging in Real Sex / BBFS+CIP.
Never fear, condom-lovers, the famously anti-science Repub Party has not yet eyed access and use of condoms or any other method of contraception that could easily have been invented and developed by blacksmiths and wood-carvers rather than scientists.[/QUOTE]
At the vanguard of said [i]"decades long War On Sex For Pleasure And Reproductive Rights"[/i], just to mention but a few of the Repub medieval and backwards ideals.
Well after these latest two (2) SCOTUS rulings (and the timing of the hearings), there's clearly no doubt now that SCOTUS, is simply a Republican Court, that has thrown out the time honored wisdom that [b]"Justice is Blind"[/b] and is very much now aligned themselves with right-wing Repub party politics.
Again, it was no surprise here! But I guess I was hoping! (...foolishly is would seem)
[b]Supreme Court to decide Trump immunity claim[/b]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-legal-cases-court-02-28-24/index.html[/URL]
AND
[b]Takeaways from the Supreme Court arguments over bump stocks and machine guns[/b]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/28/politics/takeaways-supreme-court-bump-stocks-machine-gun/index.html[/URL]
A Repub SCOTUS, will be deeply troubling going forward, but that's what Americans will have to deal with unfortunately, for the foreseeable future.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2897731]Bear in mind that the Repubs' decades long War On Sex For Pleasure And Reproductive Rights at this stage appears to be heading toward banning "chemical" methods of contraception, the kinds that were invented and developed by scientists so as not to reduce the pleasure that human beings experience while engaging in Real Sex / BBFS+CIP.
[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/11/28/russia-limits-womens-access-to-abortion-citing-demographic-changes[/URL]
In 2020, Russia had 314 abortions to 1,000 live births, compared with 188 in the European Union, according to the World Health Organization.
So as part of your made up Russia-Republican alliance, Twisty McPretzel, is the goal of this evil alliance to have more or fewer abortions? I cannot tell. And what is the goal of Democrats? Are you hoping for more?
And the scientists like Fauci love men having sex with women as God intended? LOL. Since when? You Democratic douches rolled the "scientist" Anthony Fauci out to put Trump down. Before he was scaring the shit out of everyone with Covid, there was AIDS. In the context of a conversation about childhood infections: Fauci speculates that "if the close contact of a child is a household contact, perhaps there will be a certain number of cases of individuals who are just living with and in close contact with someone with AIDS, or at risk of AIDS, who does not necessarily have to have intimate sexual contact or share a needle, but just the ordinary close contact that one sees in normal interpersonal relations. ".
Here is the video link of him saying just that: [URL]https://news.yahoo.com/video-resurfaces-fauci-warning-household-180945365.html[/URL].
Where the fuck did you get the idea that a "scientist" like Fauci was in favor of bareback sex?
Then you had the idiocy of Covid and the notion of sex with masks. In hindsight, for myself, I wish the work and travel restrictions stayed in place. I never got so much good and cheap pussy in my life. For Democratic douches like you who hung on his every word, you guys had the worst case of blue balls imaginable. What is amazing is you dumb douches still worship at the alter of Fauci.
Hey Twisty, how many back operations have you had? Because at this rate, you are going to need a few more.
-
On the occasion of two candidates' visit to the border.
No need to contrast the difference between Do Nothing, Open Borders-Loving Trump vs Real POTUS Joe Biden who has actually agreed to sign the bill full of conditions Repubs claimed to want but flip-flopped and rejected at Trump's behest.
The idiotic baby-talk and lies coming out of Trump's pie-hole vs Biden's perfectly lucid, adult, presidential demeanor and genuine invitation (again) to Repubs in Congress to get off their Do Nothing, Deadbeat Butts and give him the legislation to solve the problem since Executive Orders are only temporary at best and any of his on this issue are sure to be held up by Repub legislators and judges, should tell you everything you need to know about which candidate is capable of actually solving it.
And if that isn't enough, please note that Trump and his fellow Repubs have been lying about the "Migrant Crime Wave" inside and outside of the border towns and sanctuary cites from the beginning, all through the middle and right up until now.
From 2017:
[B]No Evidence Sanctuary Cities Breed Crime[/B]
[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2017/02/no-evidence-sanctuary-cities-breed-crime/[/URL]
[QUOTE]In a pre-Super Bowl interview on Fox, President Donald Trump claimed sanctuary cities breed crime. But limited research on the effect of such policies has found no evidence that they lead to overall increases in crime rates.[/QUOTE]From today:
[B]Trump's claims of a migrant crime wave are not supported by national data.
An NBC News review of available 2024 crime data shows overall crime levels dropping in cities that have received the most migrants.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trumps-claims-migrant-crime-wave-are-not-supported-national-data-rcna140896[/URL]
[QUOTE]WASHINGTON When Donald Trump speaks at the southern border in Texas on Thursday, you can expect to hear him talk about migrant crime, a category he has coined and defined as a terrifying binge of criminal activity committed by undocumented immigrants spreading across the country.
.....
But despite the former presidents campaign rhetoric, expert analysis and available data from major-city police departments show that despite several horrifying high-profile incidents, there is no evidence of a migrant-driven crime wave in the United States.[/QUOTE]Oh, and here is a "Thanks, Joe" bonus report:
[B]Most people think the U.S. crime rate is rising. They're wrong.
Almost 80 percent of Americans, and 92 percent of Republicans, think crime has gone up. It actually fell in 2023. An expert blames a familiar culprit for the mistaken impression.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/people-think-crime-rate-up-actually-down-rcna129585[/URL]
[QUOTE]Crime in the United States has declined significantly over the last year, according to new FBI data that contradicts a widespread national perception that law-breaking and violence are on the rise.
....
Asher and other analysts say the natural tendency of the news media to highlight disturbing crime stories and the tendency of those stories to go viral on social media presents a false but persuasive picture.
Videos of flash mobs on shop lifting sprees or carjackings in broad day light are more ubiquitous, even if those crimes are not.[/QUOTE]
-
Why not post the headline of your link for the answer?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2897765][URL]https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/11/28/russia-limits-womens-access-to-abortion-citing-demographic-changes[/URL]
In 2020, Russia had 314 abortions to 1,000 live births, compared with 188 in the European Union, according to the World Health Organization.
So as part of your made up Russia-Republican alliance, Twisty McPretzel, is the goal of this evil alliance to have more or fewer abortions? I cannot tell. And what is the goal of Democrats? Are you hoping for more?
And the scientists like Fauci love men having sex with women as God intended? LOL. Since when? You Democratic douches rolled the "scientist" Anthony Fauci out to put Trump down. Before he was scaring the shit out of everyone with Covid, there was AIDS. In the context of a conversation about childhood infections: Fauci speculates that "if the close contact of a child is a household contact, perhaps there will be a certain number of cases of individuals who are just living with and in close contact with someone with AIDS, or at risk of AIDS, who does not necessarily have to have intimate sexual contact or share a needle, but just the ordinary close contact that one sees in normal interpersonal relations. .[/QUOTE]Here, let me help you figure out the answer to your confusion about which authoritarian dictatorship-loving entity is intent on Outlawing Sex For Pleasure, Russia or the Republican Party:
This is the headline of your link that, mysteriously, you neglected to post:
[B]Russia limits women's access to abortion, citing demographic changes.
Experts say crackdown on abortion drugs and services is part of a project to instil certain values in society.[/B]
Looks to me like both of those entities are all about that. Does it really matter to you if that is the result of the same mindset from the beginning or as the result of their deep and intense collusion on so many issues over the decades?
You choose. How about choosing one answer for it today and then twist yourself into a pretzel about it tomorrow for another answer? Like Repubs on their made up "Border Crisis"! And their made up "Inflation Crisis"! For which they have proposed exactly zero solutions.
And what on earth got you into such a twist over Fauci and some ancient comment about HIV as though that has anything whatsoever to do with the Repub Party targeting pleasure-reserving "chemical" contraceptives but are so far fine with condoms or any other methods of contraception that interferes with evil Sex For Pleasure?
Oh, BTW, why was that ancient video clip of Fauci so abruptly cut practically mid sentence? You know that is always a bad sign for whatever point you Wingers think you are making. And have you got a link for the entire article Fauci wrote on the topic back in prehistoric tines that was referenced? I have a hunch that won't exactly fully support whatever your point was either.
-
??
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2897765]And the scientists like Fauci love men having sex with women as God intended? LOL. Since when? You Democratic douches rolled the "scientist" Anthony Fauci out to put Trump down. Before he was scaring the shit out of everyone with Covid, there was AIDS.[/QUOTE]What does Fauci have to do with you praising Russian reproductive rights while voting Republican? A little bit of focus goes a long way.
Irrespective of what may have caused it, we had a pandemic with over 4 million deaths and likely in the range of a million more unreported. Historically, even going back to early recorded history these tend to last two to three years. I told everyone that they needed to accept what they couldn't change while reaching for some patience. I was exactly right as we've been talking about COVID in the past tense for at least a year now. But no, so many here so eager to get their dicks wet again went chasing after global conspiracy theories.
We also needed to strike a balance to protect the vulnerable, and even children as over 18 K have died from the illness. But MAGAs refused, insisting it was all a global conspiracy to thwart Trump's re-election prospects. As a result, red states as a whole had substantially higher rates of COVID deaths. The lunacy and selfishness were astounding.
[URL]https://abcnews.go.com/Health/red-blue-america-glaring-divide-covid-19-death/story?id=83649085[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2897747]I still don't see why people like you, Tucker Carlson, and Nick Fuentes don't put your money where you mouth is and move to Russia.[/QUOTE]Oh, God. Here we go again. A hypocrite who is leaving the USA to get laid telling me how great our country is.
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2897747]Our rights apply to most everyone, even you.[/QUOTE]This from a guy who wanted rights tossed in the trash can with Covid. Did you forget this already Paulie? [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI3yU5Z2adI[/URL].
The reason you are able to go to Colombia now is because people like me called out the government on their Covid bullshit, did our research, and did all we could to ignore them. We convinced enough people they were lying and just when the majority of Americans were seeing through the scam, the government, instead of admitting it, came up with the new crisis de jour, Ukraine. And you have fallen hook, line, and sinker for that scam too.
The USA government was a bigger threat to my freedoms with Covid than Covid was. We printed up $11 trillion for Covid. For what? Now hundreds of billions for Ukraine? For what? Meanwhile, I fly from Fort Lauderdale, a shithole of an airport, to the Bogota airport, which is beautiful. Is it too much to ask that my tax dollars go to infrastructure versus the police / deep state, MIC, and for a virus that was as potent as the flu in most people?
The USA is the best country in the world in which to make a living. For the most people, the American people are compassionate and kind unless they have government or attorneys making them go to war with each other.
You paid American women to have sex and broke the law. You going to lie about that like Tooms too? Are you going to pat yourself on the back and claim to be a law abiding citizen? OMG.
And you make it out like it is me. How many people are going to ignore all the deep state warnings and all the prosecutors and vote for him?
I have an idea. If you do not like Trump as president, why don't you leave?
-
SCOTUS tells the ugly, to MTG. "Pay-Up"!!!
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2897904]...[b]We also needed to strike a balance to protect the vulnerable, and even children[/b] as over 18 K have died from the illness. But MAGAs refused, insisting it was all a global conspiracy to thwart Trump's re-election prospects. As a result, red states as a whole had substantially higher rates of COVID deaths. [u]The lunacy and selfishness were astounding.[/u]
[URL]https://abcnews.go.com/Health/red-blue-america-glaring-divide-covid-19-death/story?id=83649085[/URL][/QUOTE]Absolutely Right!
$100K in fines for MTG refusing to wear a mask in Congress during COVID. Never fails to hit'em up in the pocketbooks!
[b]MTG Loses Battle With SCOTUS Over $500 Mask Mandate Fines[/b]
[URL]https://www.thedailybeast.com/mtg-and-gop-reps-lose-battle-with-scotus-over-dollar500-mask-mandate-fines[/URL]
Perhaps Elvis 2008, and other [b]ISG "COVID Warrior Warlords"[/b], will want to add this to his 'war chest' of conspiracies on COVID. Apparently, the selfishness of not wearing masks and infringing on other people's health, has consequences...$100K worth!
-
Yes
[QUOTE=Spidy;2897922]Absolutely Right!
$100K in fines for MTG refusing to wear a mask in Congress during COVID. Never fails to hit'em up in the pocketbooks!
[b]MTG Loses Battle With SCOTUS Over $500 Mask Mandate Fines[/b]
[URL]https://www.thedailybeast.com/mtg-and-gop-reps-lose-battle-with-scotus-over-dollar500-mask-mandate-fines[/URL]
Perhaps Elvis 2008, and other [b]ISG "COVID Warrior Warlords"[/b], will want to add this to his 'war chest' of conspiracies on COVID. Apparently, the selfishness of not wearing masks and infringing on other people's health, has consequences...$100K worth![/QUOTE]Yes and this is Trump's SCOTUS. How do "deep state" conspiracy theories fit into that? This is the same SCOTUS that refused to hear stolen election hogwash. They also formally rejected the "independent state legislature theory," which was used by MAGAs in an attempt to steal the election by nullifying the rights of millions of voters who voted in good faith by mail. The word "legislature" had a broader sense at the time of the writing of the Constitution, as the SCOTUS recognized. Thus special voting provisions for COVID were perfectly valid as they were put in place by govt entities with the authority to do so.
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/27/supreme-court-north-carolina-voting-rights-maps[/URL]
-
Right-Wing spurious claims of "migrant crime"
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2897884] ... Looks to me like both of those entities are all about that. Does it really matter to you if that is the result of the same mindset from the beginning or as the result of their deep and intense collusion on so many issues over the decades?
You choose. How about choosing one answer for it today and then twist yourself into a pretzel about it tomorrow for another answer? Like Repubs on their made up [b]"Border Crisis"![/b] And their made up [b]"Inflation Crisis"![/b] [u]For which they have proposed exactly zero solutions.[/u] ...
[/QUOTE]
Repubs can't win:[LIST] the [b]popular vote[/b] or win at [b]the ballot box[/b],
• can't win on [b]the economy,[/b]
• can't win on the [b]Border Security,[/b]
• can't win on [b]abortion/IVF[/b] and women's health care/rights to autonomy over their own bodies
AND
• can't EVEN WIN on [b]"Hunter Biden Laptop dick-picks",[/b] (as Hunter Biden, just recently debunked and destroyed, the Repubs, behind closed doors, in an Oversight Committee investigation meeting). [/LIST]So what do you do, when you can't win on [b]the law[/b], or with [b]the facts[/b], you of course, invent shit and and make shit up! In other words you try to win on bullshit!
And the latest made up "American crisis", just in time and tailor made for the Repub front runner to campaign on, according to FOXY Muse is, [b]"migrant crimes surge" [/b]or [b]"crime by migrants",[/b] sweeping the country.
[b]After Rise in Murders During the Pandemic, a Sharp Decline in 2023 [/b]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/29/us/crime-data-fbi-homicides.html[/URL]
Just another right-wing dog whistle, to get conservatives, off their couches and panicking in fear, all the way to the voting box. The decline in crime is far better, than since Trump's COVID years of high crime.
-
Lolol. Perfect.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2897905]Oh, God. Here we go again. A hypocrite who is leaving the USA to get laid telling me how great our country is.
This from a guy who wanted rights tossed in the trash can with Covid. Did you forget this already Paulie? [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zI3yU5Z2adI[/URL].
The reason you are able to go to Colombia now is because people like me called out the government on their Covid bullshit, did our research, and did all we could to ignore them. We convinced enough people they were lying and just when the majority of Americans were seeing through the scam, the government, instead of admitting it, came up with the new crisis de jour, Ukraine. And you have fallen hook, line, and sinker for that scam too.
The USA government was a bigger threat to my freedoms with Covid than Covid was. We printed up $11 trillion for Covid. For what? Now hundreds of billions for Ukraine? For what? Meanwhile, I fly from Fort Lauderdale, a shithole of an airport, to the Bogota airport, which is beautiful. Is it too much to ask that my tax dollars go to infrastructure versus the police / deep state, MIC, and for a virus that was as potent as the flu in most people?
The USA is the best country in the world in which to make a living. For the most people, the American people are compassionate and kind unless they have government or attorneys making them go to war with each other.
You paid American women to have sex and broke the law. You going to lie about that like Tooms too? Are you going to pat yourself on the back and claim to be a law abiding citizen? OMG.
And you make it out like it is me. How many people are going to ignore all the deep state warnings and all the prosecutors and vote for him?
I have an idea. If you do not like Trump as president, why don't you leave?[/QUOTE]LOL. Nothing better than hearing a rabid Trumper Winger rant about how HIS Trump's Pandemic Closures were even worse for him than HIS Trump's Pandemic Covid was and how American tax dollars should be spent improving Infrastructure after 4 solid years of Classic Do Nothing Repub Trump assuring us his Infrastructure Week plans were coming "in about two weeks" when only Dem Joe Biden proposed, fought for and passed a historic Infrastructure DECADE on a bi-partisan basis!
LOL. Really. Just perfect.
BTW, have you found the section of the Thai Criminal / Penal Code that specifies that consenting adults exchanging money for sex is illegal yet? I can save you the trouble so you too can continue to be a Do Nothing Repub; there isn't one.
BTW Part 2, I hope you enjoy that historic Dem Joe Biden Infrastructure DECADE over there in the USA funded by MY taxe dollars (your beloved Trump assured us he is too "smart" to pay taxes) and facilitated entirely by MY votes for Joe Biden and the Dems.
Again, you're welcome.
-
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2897686]They've been around at least since the 90's, as I used to listen to them on shortwave radio. Then shockingly they won the WH in 2016.[/QUOTE]Nicely put!
-
Typical case in point
[QUOTE=Spidy;2897967][b]Right-Wing spurious claims of 'migrant crime'[/b]
Repubs can't win:[LIST] the [b]popular vote[/b] or win at [b]the ballot box[/b],
can't win on [b]the economy,[/b]
can't win on the [b]Border Security,[/b]
can't win on [b]abortion/IVF[/b] and women's health care/rights to autonomy over their own bodies
AND
can't EVEN WIN on [b]"Hunter Biden Laptop dick-picks",[/b] (as Hunter Biden, just recently debunked and destroyed, the Repubs, behind closed doors, in an Oversight Committee investigation meeting). [/LIST]So what do you do, when you can't win on [b]the law[/b], or with [b]the facts[/b], you of course, invent shit and and make shit up! In other words you try to win on bullshit!
And the latest made up "American crisis", just in time and tailor made for the Repub front runner to campaign on, according to FOXY Muse is, [b]"migrant crimes surge" [/b]or [b]"crime by migrants",[/b] sweeping the country.
[b]After Rise in Murders During the Pandemic, a Sharp Decline in 2023 [/b]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/29/us/crime-data-fbi-homicides.html[/URL]
Just another right-wing dog whistle, to get conservatives, off their couches and panicking in fear, all the way to the voting box. The decline in crime is far better, than since Trump's COVID years of high crime.[/QUOTE][B] Fox News guest decrying migrant crime previously arrested after getting violent over a grilled cheese sandwich he deemed too cheesy.
3/1/2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.mediamatters.org/jesse-watters/fox-news-guest-decrying-migrant-crime-previously-arrested-after-getting-violent-over[/URL]
[QUOTE]On February 28, Fox News host Jesse Watters hosted "James Lee" on his show to discuss the murder of Laken Riley on the campus of the University of Georgia. Watters did not disclose, however, that Lee is actually James DePaola, who has had multiple run-ins with the law himself, including when he became violent over a grilled cheese sandwich his wife had made, prompting his 12-year-old daughter to call the police.
On February 28, Athens-Clarke County Mayor Kelly Girtz held a press conference. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that the press conference had been interrupted multiple times by protesters, including James DePaola.
- Law-enforcement officers did not remove anybody from the room while Girtz spoke, but police asked Athens resident James Depaola several times to wait his turn to speak.
"We the people are tired of this lawlessness," Depaola told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution after the press conference ended. "We are being put last. "[/QUOTE]Now, you just KNOW that numbskull Winger is a Charter Member of Elvis and MDS1's Women-Haters Club! LOL.
Yep. More Repub-Winger phony outrage planted in the otherwise empty skulls of their base since it is impossible for Repubs to point to one now revered positive legislative result or benefit to the American People that they ever proposed, fought for and passed when they occupied the White House and had the Majority in the House and the Senate.
Not one.
Right up there with Repub-Wingers' continuing rant that Obama-Biden's historic economic recovery from GW Bush's historic Great Repub Recession and Massive Jobs Destruction wasn't "fast enough" compared to the Dems' other previous Great Recoveries from previous Great Repub Depressions / Recessions and Massive Jobs Destruction, Obama's beige suit, Biden's historic recovery from the most recent "Once in 100 Years" Repub Disaster under Trump not managing to pull us out of that Great Repub Global Supply-Chain Collapse with zero inflation or the cost of gas going up and on and on and on.
-
The Real Immigrant Crisis!
[B]Immigration is 'taking pressure off' the job market and economy, expert says.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/02/immigration-taking-pressure-off-the-job-market-us-economy-expert.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE][b]
-Why immigration is a net benefit for the economy .
-Immigration has helped put a lid on inflation.
No evidence immigrants are taking American jobs.[/b].....
Immigrants also launch new businesses at far higher rates than the overall U.S. population, according to research published in 2020.
The study authored by researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Pennsylvania, Northwestern University and the U.S. Census Bureau found immigrants in the U.S. workforce to be substantial job creators with an 80% higher entrance rate into entrepreneurship compared with native-born individuals. It examined data on more than 1 million firms founded between 2005 and 2010 that survived for at least five years.
"Overall, the findings suggest that immigrants appear to create jobs (expand labor demand) more than they take jobs (expand labor supply) in the U.S. economy, the study said.[/QUOTE][B]Biden is trying to fix Trumps broken immigration system.
2/29/2024[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/4497637-biden-is-trying-to-fix-trumps-broken-immigration-system/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Both President Biden and former President Trump are visiting the U.S.-Mexico border today, where voters will hear dueling messages about what each believes the other one has done or failed to do. As such, it is important to debunk the gargantuan myth of how successful Trump was on the issue of border security and controlling illegal immigration.
Trump was not successful. In fact, he made the issue much worse, decimating the legal immigration system while failing to deter illegal migration.[/QUOTE]Thanks, Joe.
Seriously. Was there anything related to the economy, jobs creation, national security, immigration, border control or his sworn duty to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America that Donald J. Trump did not totally fuck up to spectacularly historic disastrous results?
-
As always Touche'
"Oh, God. Here we go again. A hypocrite who is leaving the USA to get laid telling me how great our country is.
This from a guy who wanted rights tossed in the trash can with Covid. Did you forget this already Paulie?
The reason you are able to go to Colombia now is because people like me called out the government on their Covid bullshit, did our research, and did all we could to ignore them. We convinced enough people they were lying and just when the majority of Americans were seeing through the scam, the government, instead of admitting it, came up with the new crisis de jour, Ukraine. And you have fallen hook, line, and sinker for that scam too.
The USA government was a bigger threat to my freedoms with Covid than Covid was. We printed up $11 trillion for Covid. For what? Now hundreds of billions for Ukraine? For what? Meanwhile, I fly from Fort Lauderdale, a shithole of an airport, to the Bogota airport, which is beautiful. Is it too much to ask that my tax dollars go to infrastructure versus the police / deep state, MIC, and for a virus that was as potent as the flu in most people?
The USA is the best country in the world in which to make a living. For the most people, the American people are compassionate and kind unless they have government or attorneys making them go to war with each other.
You paid American women to have sex and broke the law. You going to lie about that like Tooms too? Are you going to pat yourself on the back and claim to be a law abiding citizen? OMG.
And you make it out like it is me. How many people are going to ignore all the deep state warnings and all the prosecutors and vote for him?
I have an idea. If you do not like Trump as president, why don't you leave?
[URL]https://amgreatness.com/2024/02/26/russia-russia-forever-an-anatomy-of-a-left-wing-obsession/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2897981]LOL. Nothing better than hearing a rabid Trumper Winger rant about how HIS Trump's Pandemic Closures were even worse for him than HIS Trump's Pandemic Covid was and how American tax dollars should be spent improving Infrastructure after 4 solid years of Classic Do Nothing Repub Trump assuring us his Infrastructure Week plans were coming "in about two weeks" when only Dem Joe Biden proposed, fought for and passed a historic Infrastructure DECADE on a bi-partisan basis!
LOL. Really. Just perfect.
BTW, have you found the section of the Thai Criminal / Penal Code that specifies that consenting adults exchanging money for sex is illegal yet? I can save you the trouble so you too can continue to be a Do Nothing Repub; there isn't one.
BTW Part 2, I hope you enjoy that historic Dem Joe Biden Infrastructure DECADE over there in the USA funded by MY taxe dollars (your beloved Trump assured us he is too "smart" to pay taxes) and facilitated entirely by MY votes for Joe Biden and the Dems.
Again, you're welcome.[/QUOTE]Oh, thank you. Do you have any explanation for this post?
[URL]https://mishtalk.com/politics/bidens-disapproval-rating-soars-to-59-percent-trumps-lead-biggest-yet/[/URL]
Or for this video?
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EODKUBzMnfw[/URL]
If it is anything outside of Republicans are stupid and Democrats are great, which is what you have posted nonstop for years, you do not need to respond.
Congrats on the S&P 500 call. At least you were right about one thing.
-
Sure, I have an explanation for it. Several.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2898180]Oh, thank you. Do you have any explanation for this post?
[URL]https://mishtalk.com/politics/bidens-disapproval-rating-soars-to-59-percent-trumps-lead-biggest-yet/[/URL]
Or for this video?
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EODKUBzMnfw[/URL]
If it is anything outside of Republicans are stupid and Democrats are great, which is what you have posted nonstop for years, you do not need to respond.
Congrats on the S&P 500 call. At least you were right about one thing.[/QUOTE]- At this point the demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP polling Consensus has Trump and Biden in a statistical tie, Trump squeaking out approximately half a typical +/- MoE over Biden.
- It appears the polls are oversampling Hardline Trump Cult voters in the "Independent" demo. They might try to pass themselves off as such out of understandable embarrassment over admitting to anyone that they are indeed Repubs. But that doesn't mean they get to vote twice, once as a Repub and once as a fake Independent, despite Trump's instructions for them to vote twice in 2020. That is likely the answer to the "mystery" of Biden's Party, behind in the polls most of the time, also mostly creaming Repubs in actual regular and special elections in 2018,2919, 2020,2021, Red Tsunami 2022,2023 and so far in 2024.
-At this point in the presidential election year most poll respondents are not really paying much attention to the "campaigns", whatever the hell Trump is running on. For example, only about 5-15% of even Hardcore Repub Cult voters had been guessing Trump would probably be the Repub Nominee. This during the time when it was all over the news that he was beating every other Repub candidate's ass by 40% or more! How out of the loop could poll respondents be? Turns out pretty damn far.
- Mainstream Media has been giving Trump a pass on his policies and stewardship creating Trump's Pandemic ever since January-March 2020 when it was inarguably reported in Real News sources that he removed all the "Early Warning" Pandemic Prevention teams from those Chinese labs by September 2019, months before the first evidence of Covid cases emerged in those labs and while even he knew just a 2 month heads up would have been enough to avert all the trouble. Easily.
That allows for all the numbskull Repubs to blather on about how Trump's policies and stewardship were so great, produced a "great economy" (actually, through 2019 his economy would have ranked #7 among the 11 previous presidents' economies and that is if you don't factor in the TRILLIONS he added to the deficit to buy that below average economy) and come IP with idiotic questions like, "Are you better off now than you were 4 years ago"? In 2020! LOL.
Uh, yeah, ill-informed.
I also think there is an American tendency to root for the underdog. But not necessarily to vote for one and invite him back to fuck up royally at every turn again. So some of those poll responses, maybe only a few percentage points for Trump, are on the order of "Atta boy. I like your spunk! 4 Felony charges and 91 counts! Chin up. Here, I'll toss you a bone. Sure, I'd vote for you over the greatest jobs creating, wage-increasing, global democracy-strengthening, economic recovery-producing, inflation-reducing, stock market and 401 K / IRA / Retirement Fund-improving President in History. LOL. Sure, sure, I really really really mean it. " LOL.
Among other things.
-
There is no explanation for this. So I won't even ask.
Bear in mind, there is no counterpart to this behavior, slurred speech, incoherence, repeated confusion over names of election opponents, the embarrassing baby-talk and whining, the gobbledygook blithering, the astonishing level and number of lies, etc with Joe Biden. Ever.
Nor is there a shred of evidence to suggest there will be for the next decade or more.
[B]Trump Dementia: 'You Know Argentina, Great Guy. He Loves Trump.'
Morning Joe runs a supercut of Trump speech clips, and it's painful to watch.[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/03/trump-dementia-you-know-argentina-great[/URL]
Then the following happened, in Classic Know Nothing and Do Nothing Repub fashion. Or is it simply Trump's serious dementia, or both?
[B]Trump takes credit for legislation signed by Obama.[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/n2WpSxJCoEQ?si=qt8QyL6TUSrNLWOk[/URL]
Yeah, that is the exact same President Obama that Trump has spent months reminding us he beat in 2020 and is running against today.
Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley Nikki Haley or is it Nancy might be intrinsically incapable of figuring out a side on any issue to settle on.
But as a loyal Classic Repub Trump-lover and Trump-supporter, she is doing a fantastic job of protecting their Party's lord and savior by keeping the Trump nomination process going and going and going so as not to put a final nail in it and force a Repub Nominee Trump to deal with serious questions on any issue of importance or, God forbid, have to go one on one against Joe Biden in a debate where it is certain Trump will not be able to understand a meaningful question from an unbiased moderator any more than he ever did or ever could understand the issues raised to his face by any other world leader he ever met or ever would meet.
-
Repub Sen. Tuberville "foot-in-mouth" on Crime...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2897786]No need to contrast the difference between Do Nothing, Open Borders-Loving Trump vs Real POTUS Joe Biden who has actually agreed to sign the bill full of conditions Repubs claimed to want but flip-flopped and rejected at Trump's behest.
The idiotic baby-talk and lies coming out of Trump's pie-hole vs Biden's perfectly lucid, adult, presidential demeanor and genuine invitation (again) to Repubs in Congress to get off their Do Nothing, Deadbeat Butts and give him the legislation to solve the problem since Executive Orders are only temporary at best and any of his on this issue are sure to be held up by Repub legislators and judges, should tell you everything you need to know about which candidate is capable of actually solving it.
And if that isn't enough, please note that Trump and his fellow Repubs have been lying about the "Migrant Crime Wave" inside and outside of the border towns and sanctuary cites from the beginning, all through the middle and right up until now.
From 2017:
[B]No Evidence Sanctuary Cities Breed Crime[/B]
[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2017/02/no-evidence-sanctuary-cities-breed-crime/[/URL]
From today:
[B]Trump's claims of a migrant crime wave are not supported by national data.
An NBC News review of available 2024 crime data shows overall crime levels dropping in cities that have received the most migrants.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trumps-claims-migrant-crime-wave-are-not-supported-national-data-rcna140896[/URL]
Oh, and here is a "Thanks, Joe" bonus report:
[B]Most people think the U.S. crime rate is rising. They're wrong.
Almost 80 percent of Americans, and 92 percent of Republicans, think crime has gone up. It actually fell in 2023. [u]An expert blames a familiar culprit[/u] for the mistaken impression.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/people-think-crime-rate-up-actually-down-rcna129585[/URL][/QUOTE]Yes, Americans are mistaken! To further illustrate your point.
And the hypocrisy continues and "foot-in-mouth" disease is rampant with Repubs
[URL]https://www.salon.com/2023/07/26/fact-checker-calls-out-falsehoods-in-tommy-tubervilles-tales-about-his-in-world-ii/[/URL]
Since Sen. Tuberville (R-AL), being one of the most feckless Repub Senators, wanted to attack President Joe Biden, for a recent trip to NY and tweeted this:[LIST] Tweets: "Hope Joe Biden enjoyed going out for ice cream in NYC while the rest of the city is afraid of crime and migrants." Feb 27th, 2024.[/LIST]And because Sen.Tommy Tuberville, doesn't known his head from his ass, before opening his mouth, he tried to use an old fav. from the Repub playbook, that being blue states are all just "crime ridden" places and have the "worst crime", while of course ignoring the fact that the state he hails from, [b]Alabama is 3x worse per capita than NY.[/b]
Since Sen. Tuberville, doesn't known his head from his ass, naturally he was fact checked on his tweet. As it turns out, while of course ignoring the fact that the state he hails from is 3x worse per capita than NY:
[LIST]Fact Check on NY v AL on crime:
-NY state is homicide rate is 4.8 per 100,000
-Alabama state "coach" Tuberville, represents, has a homicide rate of 15.9, the third highest in the nation.
-[b]Florida state[/b] where "coach" Tuberviile [b]actually resides/lives[/b] also has a significantly higher homicide rate (7.4) than NY.[/LIST][b]Reporter Gives Tuberville A Brutal Fact Check About [u]How Horrible His State Of Alabama Is:[/u][/b]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D49im5nOmXc[/URL]
Repubs are just simply blind to their own continuous hypocrisy and the harm they do spreading such lies. It is just astounding!
-
Right Wing Cheese or just Cheesy?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2898013][b]Fox News guest decrying migrant crime previously arrested after getting violent over a grilled cheese sandwich he deemed too cheesy. 3/1/2024[/b]
[URL]https://www.mediamatters.org/jesse-watters/fox-news-guest-decrying-migrant-crime-previously-arrested-after-getting-violent-over[/URL]
Now, you just KNOW that numbskull Winger is a Charter Member of Elvis and MDS1's Women-Haters Club! LOL. [/QUOTE] Was there ever a doubt? (...kkkk!)
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2898013]Yep. More Repub-Winger phony outrage planted in the otherwise empty skulls of their base since it is impossible for Repubs to point to one now revered positive legislative result or benefit to the American People that they ever proposed, fought for and passed when they occupied the White House and had the Majority in the House and the Senate.
[b]Not one.[/b] ...[/QUOTE] Not one, indeed!
However, the Incels/"He-Man Women Haters" Club, I see are back in the news AGAIN! The Dude (aka.James DePaola) with the violence over a "too cheesy sandwich", may yet be the strongest candidate for the [u]"Incels/He-Man Women Haters" of the year award?[/u] But consider this dude?
[b]Co-founder of Students for Trump charged with assaulting a woman with a firearm[/b]
[URL]https://www.npr.org/2023/11/29/1215793840/ryan-fournier-students-for-trump-assault[/URL]
The Ryan Fournier, "Students for Trump" acolyte, caught pistol whipping his girlfriend. Yet another gullible cult "leader/founder" of another "Trump dystopian" group, found to be charged with a violent act, against women. Definitely "cheesy", but I'll let you decide which of the two stories is cheesier (...kkkk!)
[u]Charges Dropped:[/u]
"According to the court docket in North Carolina and a spokesperson for Students for Trump co-founder Ryan Fournier: [b]charges against him for allegedly assaulting his ex-gf[/b], including hitting her on head with pistol, have been voluntarily dropped." (Nudge, nudge, wink, wink...[i]"I'll more than pistol whip ya, if you DON'T drop the charges"[/i]).
It was unclear why the charges had been dropped. Fournier, now leads a group called Radical Alert, which claims to expose how radicals have "taken over American college campuses."
Okay charges were dropped by ex-gf, but you just [b]gotta love the pivot[/b] and [b]the rebranding[/b] to "Radical Alert"! (...kkkk!)
Classic MAGA Repubs or just Classic "cheesy" Repubs?
-
Trump's New Campaign Slogan..."America SUCKS!"
Attaboy Trump!
Showing his true colors and disdain for the presidential office, for America, and the American people, with his buffoonery and wild rhetoric that [B]"America SUCKS!"[/B] and [B]"America is a JOKE!",[/B] slurred campaign speech.
Good luck with that hate campaign and hate sloganism!
PS: Unless of course it's a dog whistle to "inspire" his supporters to get out of America?
-
That Repub slogan goes back at least to Repub Icon Reagan
[QUOTE=Spidy;2899089][b] Trump's New Campaign Slogan..."America SUCKS!"[/b]
Attaboy Trump!
Showing his true colors and disdain for the presidential office, for America, and the American people, with his buffoonery and wild rhetoric that [B]"America SUCKS!"[/B] and [B]"America is a JOKE!",[/B] slurred campaign speech.
Good luck with that hate campaign and hate sloganism!
PS: Unless of course it's a dog whistle to "inspire" his supporters to get out of America?[/QUOTE]Mainstream Media would like us to falsely remember Reagan's 1984 "It's Morning Again in America" re-election Campaign pitch as a sales job to help us think wonderful things about America.
Nope.
It was only another Classic Know Nothing / Do Nothing Repub Deadbeat attempt to take credit for the reduction in Inflation and interest rates, a result for which Dem Jimmy Carter shouldered all the heavy lifting and assumed all the political risk back in late 1979, took hold as a trend by mid 1980, continued well into Reagan's first years in office and for which Ronnie Reagan had absolutely nothing to do with unless wearing cowboy hats and riding ponies at his California ranch had something to do with reducing Inflation:
[URL]https://youtu.be/pUMqic2IcWA?si=bMSMTjUad0WX_s_e[/URL]
At the same time, Mainstream Media would like us to forget Reagan's clear and unambiguous War Whoop against Evil American Democracy that so charmed and endeared America's domestic enemies and has inspired them to join and support Repub Icon Reagan's Repub Party ever since to attack and denigrate America as THEIR enemy too right up to this very day, choosing another Classic Repub lord and savior to lead the way.
Ronald Reagan, in his 1981 Inaugural. Address:
[URL]https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/inaugural-address-1981[/URL]
[QUOTE]"...government is not the solution to our problem; government IS the problem."[/QUOTE]Bear in mind, Reagan was not referring to some foreign dictatorship or monarchy. No, he was referring specifically to this government of, by and for the people, the United States of America, a constitutional federal republuc form of government that was established by our Founding Fathers precisely to solve problems for a freedom-loving complex society.
Yep, Great Repub Recession, Ten Consecutive Months of Whopping 10%+ Unemployment Rate in his 2nd and 3rd Year, Trade Arms For Hostages Felon Teflon Ronnie could just as well have highlighted his first Inagural Address with, [B]"America Sucks"![/B].
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2899089]Attaboy Trump!
Showing his true colors and disdain for the presidential office, for America, and the American people, with his buffoonery and wild rhetoric that [B]"America SUCKS!"[/B] and [B]"America is a JOKE!",[/B] slurred campaign speech.[/QUOTE]Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt.
-
Coincidentally
[QUOTE=Questner;2899127]Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt.[/QUOTE]No kidding, I just happened to watch a 1956/1957 Mike Wallace interview if Eleanor Roosevelt last night where she had no qualms about discussing ideas, minds and people in response to questions posed of her.
For example:
Of then current President Eisenhower; diplomatically, she said he was good at following orders and plans as a General but probably had less intellectual interest in a great variety of subjects than, say, Mahatma Gandhi, Winston Churchill or her husband had.
Of Richard Nixon; she said he appears to be a very intelligent person with ability but would be the least attractive choice for POTUS, an outcome that would worry her because he seems not to have any strong convictions, something she opined was needed to deal effectively with a crisis.
She was obviously a good judge of people and was quite willing to, diplomatically, offer her opinions of them.
If she were still alive today and asked about Trump, Moscow Mitch, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ted Cruz and virtually every other Classic Repub on the scene since Crooked Nixon's humiliating resignation her response would probably be to start vomiting and never stop for several days.
-
Is it small minded to discuss your future Presidents?
[QUOTE=Questner;2899127]Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt.[/QUOTE]
I suppose, if you like discussing people of little consequence? [b]Is Trump a person of little consequence to you? [/b]
So if you think talking about a 2x impeached, 4x indicted, insurrectionist and Repub fmr.president, who is now the Repub candidate for the 2024 US Election, isn't controversial and worthy of debating, when he says things like [b]"America SUCKS!"[/b] and [b]"America is a JOKE!"[/b], then perhaps you can explain to me, why spend multiple thousands of time in man hours and billions of dollars on coverage to pick a new president. Should we just hold a [i]rock-paper-scissors contest[/i] for the US presidency?
If your ideal candidate, is someone that loves to utter slurs that degrade and denigrates America, the very country in which he plans to hold office and that doesn't bother you as to the character of your president or for the vision (or lack thereof) that he has for America and Americans, then I guess Trump's your man.
Better yet, if I were to [b]take your quote and apply it to Trump[/b] (as the list of people he's insulted, defamed, besmirched and bad-mouthed, could wallpaper the White House 2x over), he has NO discernible CHARACTER, has NO VISION for America and NO PLANS ([u]unlike what Obama/Biden did for example with the [i]2016 AI Development Initiative Plans[/i],[/u] where today, the US is now the world leader in AI tech), or IDEAS with which to take the US to the next level. None! Unless you consider, "...drill baby, drill"?
So where exactly do you see Trump? Great, Average or Small minded?
I often like to use the quote: [i]"Great minds think alike and small/weak minds seldom differ"[/i]
-
Would Eleanor....???
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2899185]No kidding, I just happened to watch a 1956/1957 Mike Wallace interview if Eleanor Roosevelt last night where she had no qualms about discussing ideas, minds and people in response to questions posed of her.
For example:
Of then current President Eisenhower; diplomatically, she said he was good at following orders and plans as a General but probably had less intellectual interest in a great variety of subjects than, say, Mahatma Gandhi, Winston Churchill or her husband had.
Of Richard Nixon; she said he appears to be a very intelligent person with ability but would be the least attractive choice for POTUS, an outcome that would worry her because he seems not to have any strong convictions, something she opined was needed to deal effectively with a crisis.
She was obviously a good judge of people and was quite willing to, diplomatically, offer her opinions of them. [/QUOTE]
Nice concise masterclass on Eleanor Roosevelt!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2899185]If she were still alive today and asked about Trump, Moscow Mitch, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ted Cruz and virtually every other Classic Repub on the scene since Crooked Nixon's humiliating resignation her response would probably be to start vomiting and never stop for several days.[/QUOTE] You had me at Trump and Moscow Mitch (...kkkk!)
-
The border mess
First off, it is one thing to blame or credit a president with anything. Blaming Trump for the pandemic or giving Biden credit for going back to work after lockdowns ended is folly to me. You need to explain to me what said president did to affect the positive or negative change. Unlike the douches with their Republicans bad / Dems good diatribe, I can give Dems credit. Clinton raised taxes, balanced the budget, and made the economy went boom. The irony is the Clintons have gone from populism to elitists IMO and that is why HRC lost.
The latest Democrat twist is to say there is not an issue with the border.
So is the border problem Biden's fault? To that, the facts show not just yes but hell yes.
The EO also revoked the following executive actions:
Executive Order 13767, issued on January 25,2017, which directed executive agencies to secure the southern border and prevent illegal immigration into the United States, and called for immediate construction of a wall along the southern border.
Proclamation 9880, issued on May 8, 2019, which deemed immigrants who entered the United States without inspection ineligible for asylum.
Presidential Memorandum of April 29,2019, which prevented certain asylum seekers from pursuing any other form of immigration relief, required adjudication of asylum cases within 180 days of filing, imposed an application fee for asylum claims, and barred asylum seekers who entered the United States without inspection from receiving work authorization while their applications were pending.
Presidential Memorandum of April 6, 2018, which prevented DHS from releasing immigrants from detention while their immigration cases were pending.
Presidential Memorandum of April 4, 2018, which deployed the National Guard to secure the southwest border.
So yeah, Biden owns the border mess.
Seeing as how Democratic douches love attacking sources, the guy making this video is very pro-Ukraine. He has a Ukrainian wife and made videos condemning Putin. He is part of the group that is the new media because at this point, the mainstream is so bad that you know what they are going to say before they say it.
For me, the video was confirmation that the people ending up on the border seeking asylum are from all over the world and are not Mexican. It is an organized effort to skirt American law that benefits Mexican drug cartels. RFK Jr. Had a video showing the same thing.
If you ever want to know what Trump derangement syndrome is, you cannot get it any better than with the wall. Trump used tax payer dollars to buy supplies to build the wall. The Biden administration came in and literally said we are not going to use any of the materials that the Trump administration bought, and those supplies are sitting there to this day. Yes, the Biden administration is that fucking petty and that stupid. This video shows said supplies.
What has not been shown is illegal immigrants coming in wearing Biden t-shirts, but I am sure I will see one showing that.
Between this and Merrick Garland's latest speech condemning the use of voter ID laws shows the great criminal enterprise Biden is undertaking. He is literally allowing illegals to come into the USA to vote for him and paying them off with USA tax dollars. It is not even subtle.
Like you see with the Democratic douches here, they do not care if it is only Americans voting in the election. All they care about is if their side wins.
In 2020, if I were a judge, I would be skeptical of having to step in and possibly overturn an election, but the Dems have made it easy now with the complete fucking idiocy that went on in Colorado and Maine where Trump was tried to be taken off the ballot. And we have seen Dems weaponize the justice system to go after Trump and all these cases that just happen to materialize right before the election? At least in 2020 if there was massive cheating, it was hidden well enough that judges could not act. Now it is out in the open, and they are going to have to act if there are issues in the election. Well, at this point, we know there will be horrific cheating. It is just how well can it be hidden.
Quite frankly, with Biden mouthing off to the Supreme Court last night and openly bragging about and defying them with student loan forgiveness, I do not think judges will sit on the sidelines this time.
Dems were given a 9 to 0 loss the last time they tried to cheat and win an election without having it decided by voters.
So here is the video on the border that some here have suggested is not a problem: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdYAYgbf5Uc[/URL].
It is very much worth watching.
-
National Security as well as Border Security...the REAL Solution!
With Trump, about to receive classified documents again, it is obvious to Americans, that US national security, is at risk and in peril, once again.
If for a moment, we consider his past record with classified information, is there really any doubts, he already has plans to hawk said classified information/documents, to the Russians, Saudi Arabia and/or North Koreans...etc, to pay for his half-a-billion (plus and counting) in civil lawsuits, w/r to several defamation cases and running a corrupt and fraudulent business in the state of NY?
So it could be argued, Americans should be more worried about Trump putting [b]US national security[/b] at risk and in danger, more so than the [b]border security[/b] issue, that is more than solvable, especially given the bi-partisan bill, that just passed by the US Senate. Don't forget is was [u]Trump who put the kibosh on the border bill[/u] in the House, for petty politics and of course, 'cause he'd have nothing to campaign on.
Therefore, when you take into account, what is the [b]"constant variable",[/b] with both these problematic equational political issues, plaguing America, the answer is unequivocally...Trump!
As simply as it sounds, take out this malignant variable and eh Voil!...Americans solve both problems, with one voting strike. Problems SOLVED!
PS: Again, let's not overlook some of the [b]benefits to immigration[/b], as recently noted here: [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=2898096&viewfull=1#post2898096[/URL]
-
A possible plan to disinform America-hating Trump and his America-hating buddies
[QUOTE=Spidy;2899690]With Trump, about to receive classified documents again, it is obvious to Americans, that US national security, is at risk and in peril, once again.
If for a moment, we consider his past record with classified information, is there really any doubts, he already has plans to hawk said classified information/documents, to the Russians, Saudi Arabia and/or North Koreans...etc, to pay for his half-a-billion (plus and counting) in civil lawsuits, w/r to several defamation cases and running a corrupt and fraudulent business in the state of NY?
So it could be argued, Americans should be more worried about Trump putting [b]US national security[/b] at risk and in danger, more so than the [b]border security[/b] issue, that is more than solvable, especially given the bi-partisan bill, that just passed by the US Senate. Don't forget is was [u]Trump who put the kibosh on the border bill[/u] in the House, for petty politics and of course, 'cause he'd have nothing to campaign on.
Therefore, when you take into account, what is the [b]"constant variable",[/b] with both these problematic equational political issues, plaguing America, the answer is unequivocally...Trump!
As simply as it sounds, take out this malignant variable and eh Voil!...Americans solve both problems, with one voting strike. Problems SOLVED!
PS: Again, let's not overlook some of the [b]benefits to immigration[/b], as recently noted here: [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=2898096&viewfull=1#post2898096[/URL][/QUOTE]The best move on behalf of USA National Security is to feed Trump strategically-crafted disinformation disguised as "real" classified information.
Trump acting on it himself or peddling such disinformation to America's enemies and adversaries might be the only way for Trump to finally accomplish something of a net positive for America in his entire adult life, however inadvertent and unintentional it might be.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2899562]I suppose, if you like discussing people of little consequence? [b]Is Trump a person of little consequence to you? [/b]
So if you think talking about a 2x impeached, 4x indicted, insurrectionist and Repub fmr.president, who is now the Repub candidate for the 2024 US Election, isn't controversial and worthy of debating, when he says things like [b]"America SUCKS!"[/b] and [b]"America is a JOKE!"[/b], then perhaps you can explain to me, why spend multiple thousands of time in man hours and billions of dollars on coverage to pick a new president. Should we just hold a [i]rock-paper-scissors contest[/i] for the US presidency?
If your ideal candidate, is someone that loves to utter slurs that degrade and denigrates America, the very country in which he plans to hold office and that doesn't bother you as to the character of your president or for the vision (or lack thereof) that he has for America and Americans, then I guess Trump's your man.
Better yet, if I were to [b]take your quote and apply it to Trump[/b] (as the list of people he's insulted, defamed, besmirched and bad-mouthed, could wallpaper the White House 2x over), he has NO discernible CHARACTER, has NO VISION for America and NO PLANS ([u]unlike what Obama/Biden did for example with the [i]2016 AI Development Initiative Plans[/i],[/u] where today, the US is now the world leader in AI tech), or IDEAS with which to take the US to the next level. None! Unless you consider, "...drill baby, drill"?
So where exactly do you see Trump? Great, Average or Small minded?
I often like to use the quote: [i]"Great minds think alike and small/weak minds seldom differ"[/i][/QUOTE]I know that people get a flu in a group but loose their marbles alone.
What's about the bold text and capitals?
It's very simple for the last couple of years.
Is America more prosperous? More peaceful? More stable? How confident is the average American in his economic future? Has the legal system become more just? How much is borrowed against the well-being of the future generation? Is it sustainable? Etc.
[URL]https://youtu.be/bPd55rmNgzk?si=AEdRJNAiPHtzQb2c[/URL]
-
The emprical evidence is now overwhelming and impossible to ignore
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2899603]First off, it is one thing to blame or credit a president with anything. Blaming Trump for the pandemic or giving Biden credit for going back to work after lockdowns ended is folly to me. You need to explain to me what said president did to affect the positive or negative change. Unlike the douches with their Republicans bad / Dems good diatribe, I can give Dems credit. Clinton raised taxes, balanced the budget, and made the economy went boom. The irony is the Clintons have gone from populism to elitists IMO and that is why HRC lost.
The latest Democrat twist is to say there is not an issue with the border.
So is the border problem Biden's fault? To that, the facts show not just yes but hell yes.
The EO also revoked the following executive actions:
Executive Order 13767, issued on January 25,2017, which directed executive agencies to secure the southern border and prevent illegal immigration into the United States, and called for immediate construction of a wall along the southern border.
Proclamation 9880, issued on May 8, 2019, which deemed immigrants who entered the United States without inspection ineligible for asylum.
Presidential Memorandum of April 29,2019, which prevented certain asylum seekers from pursuing any other form of immigration relief, required adjudication of asylum cases within 180 days of filing, imposed an application fee for asylum claims, and barred asylum seekers who entered the United States without inspection from receiving work authorization while their applications were pending.
Presidential Memorandum of April 6, 2018, which prevented DHS from releasing immigrants from detention while their immigration cases were pending.
Presidential Memorandum of April 4, 2018, which deployed the National Guard to secure the southwest border.
So yeah, Biden owns the border mess.
Seeing as how Democratic douches love attacking sources, the guy making this video is very pro-Ukraine. He has a Ukrainian wife and made videos condemning Putin. He is part of the group that is the new media because at this point, the mainstream is so bad that you know what they are going to say before they say it.
For me, the video was confirmation that the people ending up on the border seeking asylum are from all over the world and are not Mexican. It is an organized effort to skirt American law that benefits Mexican drug cartels. RFK Jr. Had a video showing the same thing.
If you ever want to know what Trump derangement syndrome is, you cannot get it any better than with the wall. Trump used tax payer dollars to buy supplies to build the wall. The Biden administration came in and literally said we are not going to use any of the materials that the Trump administration bought, and those supplies are sitting there to this day. Yes, the Biden administration is that fucking petty and that stupid. This video shows said supplies.
What has not been shown is illegal immigrants coming in wearing Biden t-shirts, but I am sure I will see one showing that.
Between this and Merrick Garland's latest speech condemning the use of voter ID laws shows the great criminal enterprise Biden is undertaking. He is literally allowing illegals to come into the USA to vote for him and paying them off with USA tax dollars. It is not even subtle.
Like you see with the Democratic douches here, they do not care if it is only Americans voting in the election. All they care about is if their side wins.
In 2020, if I were a judge, I would be skeptical of having to step in and possibly overturn an election, but the Dems have made it easy now with the complete fucking idiocy that went on in Colorado and Maine where Trump was tried to be taken off the ballot. And we have seen Dems weaponize the justice system to go after Trump and all these cases that just happen to materialize right before the election? At least in 2020 if there was massive cheating, it was hidden well enough that judges could not act. Now it is out in the open, and they are going to have to act if there are issues in the election. Well, at this point, we know there will be horrific cheating. It is just how well can it be hidden.
Quite frankly, with Biden mouthing off to the Supreme Court last night and openly bragging about and defying them with student loan forgiveness, I do not think judges will sit on the sidelines this time.
Dems were given a 9 to 0 loss the last time they tried to cheat and win an election without having it decided by voters.
So here is the video on the border that some here have suggested is not a problem: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdYAYgbf5Uc[/URL].
It is very much worth watching.[/QUOTE]Who are the Dems asserting there is no issue with the border?
After Obama-Biden handed Trump the lowest rate of illegal crossings in 50 years, then Trump's policies and stewardship twice spiked up those illegal crossings to near record highs, then Trump decimated the legal Immigration system just as he was getting kicked out of office, which created the years long delays in investigating and processing asylum-seekers before turning back and deporting the fakers as is required by the USA Constitution, one of the first moves Biden made when he took over in the midst of still another "Once in 100 Years" Repub Disaster that only happens under Repubs and during virtually every Repub Presidency, was to propose and submit a plan for comprehensive Immigration Reform.
It never got an iota of interest from enough Congressional Repubs to even consider it much less pass it with the required 60 seats in the Senate.
So then the fully bipartisan-negotiated Border Bill recently submitted for Pink Tinkle House approval was killed by Trump when he ordered them to leave the borders Open and a Mess now and into the future, possibly forever, so he can use the issue to get back into the WH and again find a "Once in 100% Years" Catastrophic Repub Disaster to embrace, exacerbate and exploit to once again Crash the Economy and Wipe Out Millons upon Millions of Jobs, Supply-Chains, whatever.
Last night, when Biden was listing all the supposed Repub Border Control Wishes contained in the bill that Trump killed, the camera cut to the Ruby Red Repub Senator from Ruby Red Repub Oklahoma who was the top Ruby Red Repub negotiator of the bill, Lankford, to catch him smiling sardonically and mouthing the words, ,"That's true. ".
The Ruby Red Repub Senator from Ruby Red Repub Alabama who delivered the typically lie-filled GOP response to Biden's terrific SOTU Address, where she devoted a huge percentage of her weepy rant to her Party's Preferred Open Border Mess was also on the GOP negotiation team for that bill that Trump killed by ordering the Pink Tinkle Repub House Majority to reject it.
Still confused about which side wants to clean up Trump's Open Borders Mess and which side only wants to keep it going and complain about it?
Obviously, Biden and the Dems are the only ones taking border control seriously.
Trump's Wall? LOL. The Trump / GW Bush of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, had a Wall, relied on it and slept soundly next to it. How did that work out for Israel's Border Control and National Security?
Trump is going to need an even bigger Wall to hide behind in order to dodge appearing in public on a debate stage vs Joe Biden as he hid and dodged appearing on a debate stage even vs his definition of a "Birdbrain" GOP opponent.
-
President Biden delivers a brilliant SOTU...
President Biden's delivered a SOTU speech that was just brilliant and give the American people a triumphant acknowledgement of his resolute stewardship, with eyes looking forward (not backwards, like his predecessor) and with more success to come for America.
Highlights:
[QUOTE]"...when you get to be my age, certain things become clear. I know the American story. Again, again and again, I've seen the contest between competing forces in the battle for the soul of Out Nation. Between those who want to pull America back to the past and who want to pull America into the future. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]My lifetime as taught me to embrace freedom and democracy, a future based on core values, that defined America. Honesty, dignity, decency, equality...to RESPECT EVERYONE. to give everyone a fair shot, to give hate no safe harbor. Now some other people my age, they see it different. An American story of resentment, revenge and retribution...that's NOT ME!" [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]"...for years I've heard many of my Repubs and Dems friends say that China is on the Rise and America is falling behind. They've got it backwards! I've been saying it for over 4 years, even when I wasn't president. America is rising, we have the best economy in the world...in a thousand cities and towns, the American people are writing the GREATEST COMEBACK STORY NEVER TOLD! {...standing ovation and applause...}"[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]"...my predecessor, a former president...bowing down to a Russian leader. I think it's outrageous, dangerous and unacceptable.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]"...in my career, I've be told I was too young, ....now I'm being told I'm too old (chuckles and laughs from Congress) ...Whether young or old, Ive always known what endures. Our North Star"[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]"...it's not about how old you are, [u]it's about how old your IDEAS are."[/u][/QUOTE]
In another dig at Trump and Repubs looking down in shame over Jan 6th:
[QUOTE]"This is a moment to speak the truth and bury the lies... And here's the simplest truth. [b]You can't love your country [u]only[/u] when you win..."[/b][/QUOTE]
Now that's how you talk to the US Congress, the US House, the press and the more than 32 million American people (and millions more around the world), watching the [b]14th Best President in US History,[/b] deliver an impeccable, intelligible, meaningful yet balanced with a great outlook for American's future, all wrapped in a brilliant 2024 SOTU speech.
Biden knocked the ball, out of the park! Well done President Joe Biden, on another triumph!
[b]PS:[/b] I gotta say, it is once again refreshing to hear and see, a President who isn't afraid to poke fun at himself, or to counter what other say about him, with a sharp wit and levity. Yes refreshing indeed!
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2899736]Who are the Dems asserting there is no issue with the border?[/QUOTE]You for one.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2899736]Still confused about which side wants to clean up Trump's Open Borders Mess and which side only wants to keep it going and complain about it?
Obviously, Biden and the Dems are the only ones taking border control seriously.[/QUOTE]And why would anyone listen to you, a partisan hack in Thailand, over a sheriff in Yuma or what they see in the video? Watch the video Tooms. You might learn something.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2899690]Don't forget is was [u]Trump who put the kibosh on the border bill[/u] in the House, for petty politics and of course, 'cause he'd have nothing to campaign on.
Therefore, when you take into account, what is the [b]"constant variable",[/b] with both these problematic equational political issues, plaguing America, the answer is unequivocally...Trump!
As simply as it sounds, take out this malignant variable and eh Voil!...Americans solve both problems, with one voting strike. Problems SOLVED!
[/QUOTE]I am going to give you the same question I asked Tooms. Why would anyone listen to you some partisan hack living in another country who think Trump is responsible for everything bad in the world over a sheriff living in Yuma County or their own eyes?
You douches blather on about rule of law. How about shoplifting in San Francisco? That is fine with you douches. How about a rich Indian family who flies into Mexicali, pays the drug cartels thousands, crosses the border illegally and then calls 911 for an emergency to come pick them up? Oh yeah, fuck that rule of law. Fuck the taxpayers who are paying for 911 services. We are looking at potential future Democratic voters. That and only that as we have seen is more important than any so called law.
I don't know WTF you are talking about with some border bill. There were executive orders in place that had this mess under control and as I showed, Biden rescinded them like on day one of his presidency.
As I suggested, this may be a plot to rig the election. That is actually the better of the two outcomes. The other, and you can see it with the fucking materials in place to build the wall, is to do the exact opposite of what Trump did and think that is smart.
At this point, you douches have painted yourself into a corner. If you put the executive orders back in place, you admit Trump was right, and you were wrong. If you don't, the border stays open and you look like shit. You also have made yourself look like idiots for caring more about the borders of Ukraine than our own.
So all you can do is lie. Congress this and Congress that. And now that these illegals are going everywhere in the country, it is not just those living near the border that have issues. You got Dems like the ones in New York crying uncle.
Watch the fucking video and say something intelligent other than the issue is Trump.
-
Even Fux News' Economics Expert Agrees With Biden on his economy
No doubt about it; after Trump's economic and national security policies, stewardship and lies converted a likely easily manageable endemic confined to one region in China into the historic deadly, worldwide economy Crashing, Supply-Chain collapsing, millions upon millions of jobs-destroying, Hyper Inflation-triggering Pandemic it became, Joe Biden's Great Dem Recovery has produced the Strongest Economy in the World.
According to Ultra Winger Fux News Economic Expert, Stephen Moore, in agreement with Joe Biden himself:
[B]Stephen Moore Agrees With Biden, US Economy Best In The World[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/03/stephen-moore-agrees-pres-biden-us-economy[/URL]
[QUOTE]"One thing President Biden said that was true," Stephen Moore said. "It is true that the United States today have the strongest economy. There's no question about it if you look at what's happening in Europe today, Germany, France, Japan and China they are not growing..."
After claiming most of the world's economies are suffering, he finished with this.
"That's something that's important to cheer," said Moore.
The facts, figures, and numbers are so strong that even these idiots can't deny that the US economy is roaring under President Biden.[/QUOTE]Also, considering Trump's "best" first 3 years only ranked #7 out of the recent 11 presidents' economies (means it now ranks #8 among the recent 12), he kept America's military actively involved in a War throughout his entire presidency while we are no longer actively involved in any War anywhere and haven't been for 3 years, that the violent crime rates are now at decades' lows and Constitutional Oath-Breaking Insurrectionists like Donald Trump as well as his violent, cop-killing cult followers have finally been indicted for their crimes, by every important metric and definition, America is today inarguably more prosperous, more peaceful, more stable, the legal system far more just and, therefore, all Americans have experienced a far better result, are much, much better off and are in store for a much better future today than they experienced and faced five years ago, six years ago and seven years ago.
Unless a "Once in 100 Years Disaster" Repub is given control of the levers again and plunges us into another one of the Repub Party's patented Great Repub Recession / Depression and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction, that is.
-
There are other opinions on the 'fiery' speech:
[URL]https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/mar/8/dr-carole-lieberman-forensic-psychiatrist-sees-sig/[/URL]
Where's Elder Justice Initiative?
-
Good questions, I'd like to hear more...
[QUOTE=Questner;2899718]I know that people get a flu in a group but loose their marbles alone.[/QUOTE]
Uhh?
[QUOTE=Questner;2899718]What's about the bold text and capitals?[/QUOTE] Have you NEVER before seen newsprint, articles, magazines, poetry and/or books, that have [b]words[/b] or [b]sentences[/b] in [b]bold[/b] or CAPITALIZATION? Or [i]italics[/i]? Or when words are [u]underlined?[/u]
It is a very common thing writers, penmen, poets, wordsmiths columnists and authors will do for [u]any number of [b]emphatic[/b] stylistic reasons.[/u]
[QUOTE=Questner;2899718]It's very simple for the last couple of years.
Is America more prosperous? More peaceful? More stable? How confident is the average American in his economic future? Has the legal system become more just? How much is borrowed against the well-being of the future generation? Is it sustainable? Etc.
[URL]https://youtu.be/bPd55rmNgzk?si=AEdRJNAiPHtzQb2c[/URL][/QUOTE]Lot of good questions here, with a wide range of topics, I would love to debate. But I'm afraid I didn't catch the video and what it meant in relation, w/r to each your questions.
Could you explain each of your points of view w/r to the questions your asking? Yes, please state your cases!
BTW, the simple answer to all of your questions could easily be "YES", "YES", "Very", "Depends", "Depends", "Probably", but that's not exactly a debate...now is it?
-
Shocker
It turns out that new Ruby Red MAGA Repub Senator from Ruby Red Repub Alabama who gave that weepy, whiny, GOP response to Dem Joe Biden's terrific SOTU Address is a flat out LIAR.
Shocking, I know.
That story she told in detail about some young girl being repeatedly gang raped in the USA by drug runners let in by evil Joe Biden that she has repeatedly told and told again with relish in her internationally televised GOP response? Yeah, it happened in Mevico while Ruby Red Repub GW Bush was so-called president.
Joe Biden was not the President at that time. He wasn't even Vice President at that time.
[B]Katie Britt Used Decades-Old Example of Rapes in Mexico as Republican Attack on Biden Border Policy.[/B]
[URL]https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2024-03-09/republican-senator-used-decades-old-example-of-rapes-in-mexico-to-attack-biden-border-policies[/URL]
[QUOTE]The Republican senator who gave the partys response to President Joe Bidens State of the Union address used a harrowing account of a young womans sexual abuse to attack his border policies, but the rapes did not happen in the U.S. or during the Biden administration.
First-term Sen. Katie Britt of Alabama in the GOP response criticized current immigration policies, describing how she had met a woman at the U.S.-Mexico border who told of being raped thousands of times in a sex trafficking operation run by cartels, starting at age 12.
"We wouldnt be OK with this happening in a third-world country. This is the United States of America, and its past time we start acting like it," Britt said in the Thursday night speech televised from her home in Alabama. President Bidens border crisis is a disgrace." [/QUOTE]I am sure Fux News will insist she appear on one of their top-rated prime time lie-fests to apologize to the World, America and specifically Joe Biden for repeating that favorite Ruby Red MAGA Lie in her GOP response the other night. Lolol.
-
Brilliant Idea!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2899715]The best move on behalf of USA National Security is to feed Trump [b]strategically-crafted disinformation disguised as "real" classified information.[/b]
Trump acting on it himself or peddling such disinformation to America's enemies and adversaries might be the only way for Trump to finally accomplish something of a net positive for America in his entire adult life, however inadvertent and unintentional it might be.[/QUOTE]Bravo...I like your thinking!
I need to remind myself, to fake a headache, if you ever were to offer me a game of chess...kkkk!
-
Why?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2899886]You for one.
And why would anyone listen to you, a partisan hack in Thailand, over a sheriff in Yuma or what they see in the video? Watch the video Tooms. You might learn something.[/QUOTE]Because the facts, data and verifiable record of results are on Joe Biden's and my side of the argument and not on yours and Trump's. That's why.
-
Or was it Newsmax? Breitbart?
[QUOTE=Questner;2899990]There are other opinions on the 'fiery' speech:
[URL]https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/mar/8/dr-carole-lieberman-forensic-psychiatrist-sees-sig/[/URL]
Where's Elder Justice Initiative?[/QUOTE]LOL. I'm guessing most of the article titles that nobody heard of and had absolutely nothing to do with the purpose of Trump's Fed Appointee Powell's hearing rattled off by numbskull Repub Senator Kennedy in your previous post link originated at The Washington Times or similar too, right?
So is our conclusion supposed to be that even a drugged up, senile, decrepit, mentally incapacitated old Dem is more lucid, better informed, more truthful, more competent, capable, coherent and certainly more effective in producing positive results for America than any Repub potus in the past 100 years or more and especially way, way more than the most popular and beloved (among Repubs) Repub candidate opposing him today?
Well, if just a few bucks worth of that miracle drug Biden supposedly was given also contributed to his producing one of the greatest and strongest American economies in history while $2+ Trillion American tax dollars upfront and an estimated $1. 5 Trillion added to the deficit every 10 years for Trump's one and only economic "stimulus" legislation that produced at least a million fewer jobs with it than without it and, at that, still only managed to place his 3 "best" years prior to Trump's Pandemic at #8 out of the 12 most recent presidents' economies, I say go ahead and mix those tablets into Joe's ice cream scoops every now and then.
-
Well, I perceive bold text and capitalization both as shouting which is rude and patronizing to a reader, as if any reader can't follow or comprehend the whole text of the article.
[URL]https://www.heritage.org/press/oversight-project-sues-department-justice-records-used-hur-report[/URL]
The President's "aliases include Robin Ware, Robert L. Peters and JRB Ware" Is it?
[URL]https://spectator.org/grumpy-old-man-mumbles-state-of-the-union/[/URL] No comments here.
[URL]https://www.theamericanconservative.com/bidens-state-of-the-union-was-a-declaration-of-war/[/URL]
I would say that the President has deep personal conflict of interest with respect to Ukraine and this conflict of interest costs everyone dearly.
-
That's Common
[QUOTE=Spidy;2899995]Uhh?
Have you NEVER before seen newsprint, articles, magazines, poetry and/or books, that have [b]words[/b] or [b]sentences[/b] in [b]bold[/b] or CAPITALIZATION? Or [i]italics[/i]? Or when words are [u]underlined?[/u]
It is a very common thing writers, penmen, poets, wordsmiths columnists and authors will do for [u]any number of [b]emphatic[/b] stylistic reasons.[/u]
Lot of good questions here, with a wide range of topics, I would love to debate. But I'm afraid I didn't catch the video and what it meant in relation, w/r to each your questions.
Could you explain each of your points of view w/r to the questions your asking? Yes, please state your cases!
BTW, the simple answer to all of your questions could easily be "YES", "YES", "Very", "Depends", "Depends", "Probably", but that's not exactly a debate...now is it?[/QUOTE]The posters that pepper off a long list of questions are the ones that desperately want to debate, but can't.
-
The Elephant in the room, ...that is Trump!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2899902] You douches blather on about rule of law. How about shoplifting in San Francisco? That is fine with you douches. How about a rich Indian family who flies into Mexicali, pays the drug cartels thousands, crosses the border illegally and then calls 911 for an emergency to come pick them up? Oh yeah, fuck that rule of law. Fuck the taxpayers who are paying for 911 services. We are looking at potential future Democratic voters. That and only that as we have seen is more important than any so called law. [/QUOTE]
Well you just can't please everyone! Look, is SF no longer a "blue" city?
[b]San Francisco 'can no longer be called progressive city...[/b]
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/media/san-francisco-no-longer-called-progressive-city-newspaper-declares-law-order-measures-pass[/URL]
As for SF, I'd thought you'd be happy [i]([b]ie.[/b] you know, like Trump's two fisted, hand pumping from side-to-side, [b]jerking-off two dicks simultaneously happy[/b]...kkkk!)[/i], with the "anti-woke" laws that just passed, it seems to me SF, is addressing and tackling some of it's problems and not running away from them, because Trump tells them "...when and how high to jump".
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2899902] I don't know WTF you are talking about with some border bill. There were executive orders in place that had this mess under control and as I showed, Biden rescinded them like on day one of his presidency. [/QUOTE]
Yes the border bill, the one with bipartisan support in the Senate (when I said it passed, I misspoke). The same one that had everything Repubs, wanted for US Border Security. The very same one,
[b]Biden shamed Repubs with,[/b] in his brilliant SOTU speech. The very same one, Trump ordered the House Repubs to put the kibosh on, where it was basically DOA in the House!
[b]Donald Trump brags about his efforts to scuttle bipartisan border deal[/b]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/01/27/trump-border-biden/[/URL]
Yes, that border bill, [b]the one Trump put the kibosh on![/b]
Yes, the same border, Repub Sen. Katie Britt, was being disingenuous about and malodorously implied, her sex-trafficking sob story happened during Biden's term.
[b]Was Trump supporter Katie Britt caught in whopping lie about graphic sex trafficking story?[/b]
[i]See inset video by journalist, Jonathan M. Katz[/i]
[URL]https://www.nj.com/news/2024/03/was-sen-katie-britt-caught-in-whopping-lie-about-graphic-sex-trafficking-story.html[/URL]
As for the rest of your incoherent and blabbering rant, if you choose to willfully [b]overlook[/b] and [b]ignore[/b] the rather large elephant in the room, that is Trump, well that's on you.
You Repubs, may [b]cowardly[/b] turn a blind-eye and are often blinded to Trumps malignant, crazy, destructive, malicious and pernicious behavior and thuggin' influence, the rest of us see the wanna be fascist dictator, for what he truly represents, is nothing short of insidious.
-
Repub Sen. Katie Britt, border lies..BUSTED!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2899998][b]Shocker.[/b] It turns out that new Ruby Red MAGA Repub Senator from Ruby Red Repub Alabama who gave that weepy, whiny, GOP response to Dem Joe Biden's terrific SOTU Address is a flat out LIAR.
Shocking, I know.
That story she told in detail about some young girl being repeatedly gang raped in the USA by drug runners let in by evil Joe Biden that she has repeatedly told and told again with relish in her internationally televised GOP response? Yeah, it happened in Mevico while Ruby Red Repub GW Bush was so-called president.
Joe Biden was not the President at that time. He wasn't even Vice President at that time.
[B]Katie Britt Used Decades-Old Example of Rapes in Mexico as Republican Attack on Biden Border Policy.[/B]
[URL]https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2024-03-09/republican-senator-used-decades-old-example-of-rapes-in-mexico-to-attack-biden-border-policies[/URL]
I am sure Fux News will insist she appear on one of their top-rated prime time lie-fests to apologize to the World, America and specifically Joe Biden for repeating that favorite Ruby Red MAGA Lie in her GOP response the other night. Lolol.[/QUOTE] "Shocker", that more Repubs are being disingenuous and misrepresenting the truth, on such big issues like border security...yeah don't say! (...kkkk!)
[b]Was Trump supporter Katie Britt caught in whopping lie about graphic sex trafficking story?[/b]
[i]See inset video by journalist, Jonathan M. Katz, who broke the story.[/i]
[URL]https://www.nj.com/news/2024/03/was-sen-katie-britt-caught-in-whopping-lie-about-graphic-sex-trafficking-story.html[/URL]
Once again, even with something as important as a SOTU Rebuttal, Repubs are being disingenuous, insincere and spreading misinformation, to the American people, knowing full well, [b][i]"...a lie travels half-way around the world, before the truth can get it boots on!"[/i][/b]
We'll see about any forthcoming retraction, on FOXY Muse or any other right-wing propaganda outlet....but I would hold my breath!
-
I Am Lion, Hear Me Roar...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2899927]No doubt about it; after Trump's economic and national security policies, stewardship and lies converted a likely easily manageable endemic confined to one region in China into the historic deadly, worldwide economy Crashing, Supply-Chain collapsing, millions upon millions of jobs-destroying, Hyper Inflation-triggering Pandemic it became, Joe Biden's Great Dem Recovery has produced the Strongest Economy in the World.
According to Ultra Winger Fux News Economic Expert, Stephen Moore, in agreement with Joe Biden himself:
[B]Stephen Moore Agrees With Biden, US Economy Best In The World[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/03/stephen-moore-agrees-pres-biden-us-economy[/URL]
[i]"...The facts, figures, and numbers are so strong that [b]even these idiots[/b] can't deny that the [u]US economy is roaring under President Biden.[/u]"[/i]
[/QUOTE] Great Post! The more great economic news to report, the less Repubs will have to campaign on.
Let me be so bold, as to also extend those undeniable, factual and truthful reporting, w/r to yet another glowing report on the US economy under President Joe Biden, to our [i]Russian "useful idiots"[/i] and so called [i]Repub ISG "economists",[/i] and say that the US economy is not just okay, tepid, or mah...[b]it is indeed R.O.A.R.I.N.G.!!![/b]
[LIST]Not to add more insult to injury, but more great news. The Feb 2024, US job numbers are better than expected, coming in with [b]275K added:[/b] [URL]https://www.cnn.com/business/live-news/jobs-report-february-03-08-24/index.html[/URL][/LIST]
[QUOTE=Spidy;2900281]...on FOXY Muse or any other right-wing propaganda outlet....but I would hold my breath! [/QUOTE] [b]Correction:[/b] Should have read: "...but I [b]wouldn't[/b] hold my breath!"
-
Aren't words, more meaningful?
[QUOTE=Questner;2900263][URL]https://www.heritage.org/press/oversight-project-sues-department-justice-records-used-hur-report[/URL]
The President's "aliases include Robin Ware, Robert L. Peters and JRB Ware" Is it?
[URL]https://spectator.org/grumpy-old-man-mumbles-state-of-the-union/[/URL] No comments here.
[URL]https://www.theamericanconservative.com/bidens-state-of-the-union-was-a-declaration-of-war/[/URL]
I would say that the President has deep personal conflict of interest with respect to Ukraine and this conflict of interest costs everyone dearly.[/QUOTE] Uhh?
To what or to whom does any of this part of your post address?
Is it answering to past questions, I asked of you? Or someone else? Or just new business you're wanting to address?
[QUOTE=Questner;2900263]Well, I perceive bold text and capitalization both as shouting which is rude and patronizing to a reader, as if any reader can't follow or comprehend the whole text of the article. [/QUOTE]
Therein lies the artistry of the post. Granted, a writer's stylistic queues, my not suit everyone, but do that which makes you an individual. Or NOT!
Listen, there are many things ISGers, can point to that are REALLY and truly rude, [u]least of which[/u] is the odd word or two, that is [b]bolded[/b], CAPITALIZED, [i]italicized[/i], or [u]underlined.[/u] for effect, when writing.
Point and case, in your recent post for instance, you didn't include my quote (or anyone else's) in your post, to whom your criticisms, explanations, or comments are directed toward. This can also be seen as [b]rude.[/b] Not to mention very confusing to readers.
Also leaves the reader confused as to whom or to what some of the other comments, links and articles, in your post are addressing. Or perhaps just lazy posting, where it's left up to the reader to figure these things out for themselves?
Personally, I tend to focus on the [u]actual WORDS[/u] that are being said, by the writer of the post. Consider the rest as [b]"a poetic license"[/b] or colorful way, to draw the reader in, as writers have done before me, for eons.
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2900270][b]That's Common.[/b] The posters that pepper off a long list of questions are the ones that desperately want to debate, but can't. [/QUOTE] Yes, very common indeed! My fav. the post with ONLY a single link to some video/article "debate" counter argument.
-
Spidy, my bad for not checking the record of your posts before.
The greatest contribution to this hookers forum was your post about 'whitezilla' (wtf?
-
There The Repubs Go Again
Classic Repubs will say anything, do anything, lie, cheat and steal to make cuts to Social Security, Medicare and other now revered positive legislative accomplishments for the American people that Dems proposed, fought for and passed (but which Repubs never have) in order to shift American taxpayer dollars from funding those magnificent quality of life for everyone achievements into the pockets of their favorite political donor class wealthiest, top income margins and corporate CEOs.
Repubs always have and always will.
[B]There you go again: Lessons from previous US debates[/B]
[URL]https://www.ft.com/content/15e746b6-81ce-11e6-8e50-8ec15fb462f4[/URL]
[QUOTE]
Reagans other famous one-liner from the debate was, [b]There you go again, which he said in response to Mr Carters accusation that Reagan wanted to eliminate Medicare.[/b] After that, There you go again became Reagans signature rejoinder to his critics.[/QUOTE][B]Reagan Budget Means Drastic Cuts In Medicare and Medicaid Programs.
Fifth of Nation Is Affected Reagan Budget Means Drastic Surgery for Medicare, Medicai.
Aug. 20, 1981[/B]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1981/08/21/reagan-budget-means-drastic-cuts-in-medicare-and-medicaid-programs/5c74d19a-dfdc-4c57-924f-feb27dc78f9c/[/URL]
[B]Republican lawmakers push back after Biden says GOP wants to cut Social Security, Medicare: 'Dishonest move'[/B]
[URL]https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/republican-lawmakers-push-back-biden-says-gop-wants-cut-social-security-medicare[/URL]
[B]Trump says he's willing to cut entitlements to shrink the $23 trillion national debt.
March 12, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/trump-cut-funding-entitlements-social-security-medicare-national-debt-reelection-2020-3-1028972301[/URL]
[B]Trump on Social Security, Medicare cuts: There is a lot you can do.
March 11, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4523816-trump-social-security-medicare-cuts-there-is-a-lot-you-can-do/[/URL]
-
Biden and his Dem Senate has China squealing. Trump never did and never will.
Add this to Trump's 37+ times he went limp dick on Russia, trying not only to reverse the imposition of sanctions against Russia for invading Georgia and Crimea and its unprecedented election interference to help Trump win but to actually reward Russia for it and you can see as clear as day why Russia and "Make sure I win" China loves Trump and dreads the idea of Four More Years of Biden.
[B]'The decoupling's really in full force': expert warns of more USA Curbs on China.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/12/-us-curbs-on-china-to-rise-with-decoupling-in-full-force-expert-warns.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]In October 2022, the U.S. introduced rules aimed at blocking Chinas access to high-tech semiconductor chips and chip-manufacturing equipment amid concerns that China could use them for military purposes.
A year later, the U.S. said it was going to introduce more restrictions to close gaps that arose after 2022′s restrictions on AI chip exports went into effect.
"If it (U.S.) persistently monopolizes the high end of the value chain, and keeps China at the low end, where is fairness and competition?" Wang said.[/QUOTE]
-
'Tis nobler to debate or NOT to debate?
[QUOTE=Paulie97;2900270]That's Common. The posters that pepper off a long list of questions are the ones that desperately want to debate, but can't.
[/QUOTE]
I have to say, when you're right, you're right! And you're soooo RIGHT!
It does bears repeating! That when guys come here, to flex their [b]"debating muscle(s)"[/b] and CANNOT, it's [u]nothing new[/u] and as you've aptly said...it's VERY COMMON!. Must have seen it a several hundred times!
But of course, there are those that then (often angrily and in frustration), naturally turn and grab the [i][b]"lowest hanging fruit"[/b][/i], that they can find and post it, as some form of "argument" or "counterpoint" to their so called idea of "debating". (NOTE: Often taking things out of context, to suit their [u][i]boorish narrative[/i][/u])
This sophomoric attempt to flex whatever remaining shred of a so called rebuttal, they can muster, is soooo very reminiscent of the recent [b]Repubs SOTU Rebuttal[/b], that was widely panned,
mocked, ridiculed, SNL'd and even punk'd, clowned, (to some seen as) [i]"creepy"[/i] and scorned as [i]"cringeworthy"[/i] by her own fellow Republican colleagues. An historical low and one of the worst rebuttals in recent history.
[b]Katie Britt State of the Union Rebuttal Torched by Republicans[/b]
[URL]https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/katie-britt-sotu-rebuttal-torched-republicans-1234983528/[/URL]
[b]"Parody-Level Terrible": Even Republicans Are Panning Katie Britt's...[/b]
[URL]https://www.vanityfair.com/news/katie-britt-state-of-the-union-rebuttal[/URL]
Perhaps, they'd ALL do better, if they did a "tag-team-up" with [b]ChatGPT AI[/b], to write their [u]nonsensical[/u] rebuttals? But then again, they'd probably fuck that up too! (...kkkk!)
-
Oh! Dear Eleanor...
[QUOTE=Questner;2900562]Spidy, my bad for not checking the record of your posts before.
The greatest contribution to this hookers forum was your post about 'whitezilla' (wtf? [/QUOTE]
[b]What now?[/b]...NO DEBATE? Or follow up arguments to any questions, that were put forth to you? Now all you want to do is, [u]discuss moi?[/u]
But wait a minute, wasn't it you that started your so called "debate", herein with your [b]"small mind"[/b] quote from dear ol' Eleanor Roosevelt (R.I.P.)?
[b]Here, let me refresh your memory:[/b]
[QUOTE=Questner;2899127] Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; [u][b]small minds discuss people.[/b][/u]
Eleanor Roosevelt.[/QUOTE]
Oh Shit! It seems your recent post, has you stepping right into your own hypocritical[b] "small minded bullshit"![/b] Hmmm...very messy and small minded indeed! But good luck with that!
Right now, I think this quote/idiom, (although perhaps a bit morbid), is most befitting of the moment ([b]me thinks[/b])!
[QUOTE]"If you give a man enough rope, he's sure to hang himself." --Unknown [Swinger][/QUOTE]
BTW, poor ol' dear Eleanor, she must be just literally, rolling over in her grave! (...kkkk!)
-
Tik Tok-ing on a Ledge?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2900580]Add this to Trump's 37+ times he went limp dick on Russia, trying not only to reverse the imposition of sanctions against Russia for invading Georgia and Crimea and its unprecedented election interference to help Trump win but to actually reward Russia for it and you can see as clear as day why Russia and "Make sure I win" China loves Trump and dreads the idea of Four More Years of Biden.
[B]'The decoupling's really in full force': expert warns of more USA Curbs on China.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/12/-us-curbs-on-china-to-rise-with-decoupling-in-full-force-expert-warns.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL][/QUOTE]
In the article, I have to wonder, is Tik Tok (BtyeDance), really though, a substantially much bigger threat to US national security, anymore so than Apple, Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp, Samsung, Google or Microsoft, is with our data? Facebook/Instagram, is still reeling from the online Child Bullying and Exploitation hearings and so far, it's just a slap on the wrist and a sorry ass apology.
Perhaps the country should be worried about a would be corrupt president, who can easily be bought, sold and bribed, and how that effects US national security, wayyyy more than some App.
Point and case, on Aug 6th, 2020, Trump signed an executive order to ban Tik Tok unilaterally, then declaring it to be "bad", "evil", "dangerous" and tried to force the company to be sold. But eventually, it was struck down by the courts. Fast forward to today (Mar 8, 2024) and queue the corrupt, grifting Trump's Tik Tok (and Bud-light) [b]"flip-flop",[/b] 180 about turn is complete and all it took was a nice donation. Even winger Steve Bannon, looked shocked and thinks "Trump has been bought" --here:[URL]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/steve-banngmailgmon-suggests-donald-trump-has-been-bought/ar-BB1jE1gh[/URL]
Now that his campaign received a rather large donation and/or campaign support, by one Jeff Yass (a billionaire, whose investment company owns 15% of ByteDance), Trump was singing a new and
different tune and w/r to banning Tik Tok.
[b]Why Trump Flipped on TikTok[/b]
[URL]https://time.com/6900348/tiktok-ban-donald-trump-congress/[/URL]
Sure ban it from ALL levels of gov't, but of the rest of the 150 million US Tik Tok users, are good entrepreneurs, that actually earn a decent living on Tik Tok. So I'm not sure this is a clear cut win for Dems. Think class action lawsuits for lost of wages/earnings and even a lost of younger voters, could spell trouble for Dems.
Yikes! Am I, in danger of siding with Trump w/r to Tik Tok (albeit for different reasons)? Someone wanna talk me down off this ledge? (...kkkk!)
-
Yes, Trump is For Sale 24/7, even during his sleepy time now.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2900973]In the article, I have to wonder, is Tik Tok (BtyeDance), really though, a substantially much bigger threat to US national security, anymore so than Apple, Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp, Samsung, Google or Microsoft, is with our data? Facebook/Instagram, is still reeling from the online Child Bullying and Exploitation hearings and so far, it's just a slap on the wrist and a sorry ass apology.
Perhaps the country should be worried about a would be corrupt president, who can easily be bought, sold and bribed, and how that effects US national security, wayyyy more than some App.
Point and case, on Aug 6th, 2020, Trump signed an executive order to ban Tik Tok unilaterally, then declaring it to be "bad", "evil", "dangerous" and tried to force the company to be sold. But eventually, it was struck down by the courts. Fast forward to today (Mar 8, 2024) and queue the corrupt, grifting Trump's Tik Tok (and Bud-light) [b]"flip-flop",[/b] 180 about turn is complete and all it took was a nice donation. Even winger Steve Bannon, looked shocked and thinks "Trump has been bought" --here:[URL]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/steve-banngmailgmon-suggests-donald-trump-has-been-bought/ar-BB1jE1gh[/URL][/QUOTE]I am not so impressed by Biden and his Dems targeting tik tok. After all, the Repub Pink Tinkle House is / was also ready to shut it down. And we all know the overriding principle of all major legislation is the worth of it, whatever it is, is diminished by every single Repub vote it garners; The most positive results for America being to pass legislation without a single Repub vote or at least without a single Repub vote required to pass it while the most negative results legislation being anything passed with only Repub votes. Always.
In that report, this was the part I cared most about:
[QUOTE]This comes after the U.S. has been ramping up pressure on Chinese companies in recent years, particularly in the semiconductor, EV and biotech sectors.[/QUOTE]But, definitely, Trump badly, badly, badly needs money. Turns out that claim of him being worth billions has been utter bullshit. As was his claim to have "substantially more cash on hand than $400 billion and increasing every month. " LOL. And it could be his dumb sucker Repub hillbilly donations are drying up.
Which means he is more ripe than ever for being "compromised" by anyone from any country for any reason who simply hands him a check in exchange for whatever National Security Classified documents and info he has stolen and willfully retained and hidden from the authorities requesting him to return them to their rightful owners.
And that also goes for whatever Classified info America-hating Repubs have foolishly delivered into his claws by their Repub Primary Votes this year.
Yeah, it isn't just Trump's recent hilarious Flip-Flops on Bud Light and Tik Tok within hours of those entities' sources cutting him a check for any silly amount he was begging for. Xi, Putin, Kim, the Taliban, Hamas, Iran, you name it, will all be lining up (again) to cut checks for Trump as soon as he starts getting access to Classified information.
This time Trump is so desperate I would not be surprised if he handed over every tid bit of the info he gets to anyone who can clear a check for, oh, $5,000 or so. Loser beggars like him can't afford to hold out for anything but low rent chump change. And every potential buyer out there knows it.
-
Witness the Blood Bath, when cowardly Repubs...do nothing!
Repubs, from the RNC to the GOP, from the conservative centre-right to the "normiees", "moderates" and beyond the grave (ie. Lincoln and Reagan, must rolling over in their graves), may I say [b]R.I.P.!!![/b]
It's a purge, it's a takeover, it a gutting, it's a slashing of heads (metaphorically), ...yep [b]it's "MAGA Trump"[/b], hollowing out of the [i]"GOP/RNC donut"[/i] and filling it with [i]"MAGA/QAnon Cult spineless jelly",[/i] as more than 60+ positions at the RNC are slashed and cut, to make way for Trump loyalists.
[b]'Absolute bloodbath' at RNC as new leadership loyal to Trump purges...[/b]
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/11/new-rnc-leadership-trump-loyals-purge-staff[/URL]
It's official RNC/GOP party, the "old guard" numbers, are almost to the point of EXTINCTION! Trump World, MAGAland, QAnon World and the Heritage Foundation [b]"Project 2025"[/b] has officially begun in earnest.
[b]Critics warn RNC 'bloodbath' a preview of what [u]Project 2025[/u] would do if Trump is reelected[/b]
[URL]https://www.commondreams.org/news/project-2025-trumps-rnc-bloodbath-with-federal-government[/URL]
[LIST]Check out this quote and famous last words from Moscow Mitch (June 1st, 2016):
[QUOTE=Moscow Mitch] "...Donald Trump is not going to change what I think, [b]he's not gonna change the platform of the Republican Party, the views of the Repub party...[/b][u]I think we're much more likely to change him"[/u] (...kkkk!)
"Because if he is president, [u]he's much more likely[/u] to have to deal within, sort of like the center of right world, which is where most of us [Repubs] are..."[/QUOTE][/LIST]Fear not you stalwart "Never Trumpers" and RVAT voters, the good news is, that the Dems may yet get the House back (and hopefully more seats in the Senate), to do what you [b]cowardly bunch[/b] didn't do when you had the power to do it.
If the remaining Repubs in congress, are as smart (or NOT as cowardly) as they claim, they'll not let the same think happen in the 2024 US Presidential Election, nor in the [b]Ukraine[/b] (and beyond), with Russia.
Heed this gutting of the RNC and [b][i]"blood bath"[/i][/b] as a warning, to all ye remaining "good conservative" Repubs. The writing is on the wall!!!
Question and Point of Logic: With the [i]"RNC blood bath"[/i] now in full swing, does this mean the party once known as the [i]"Ruby Red Party"[/i], SHOULD BE now known as the [i][b]"Blood(y) Red Party?"[/b][/i] (...kkkk!)
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2900970][b]What now?[/b]...NO DEBATE? Or follow up arguments to any questions, that were put forth to you? Now all you want to do is, [u]discuss moi?[/u]
But wait a minute, wasn't it you that started your so called "debate", herein with your [b]"small mind"[/b] quote from dear ol' Eleanor Roosevelt (R.I.P.)?
[/QUOTE]Why would anyone want to debate you fools? It is more fun just to watch you guys lie to each other and jerk each other off.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2900970]Look, is SF no longer a "blue" city?
San Francisco 'can no longer be called progressive city
with the "anti-woke" laws that just passed, it seems to me SF, is addressing and tackling some of it's problems[/QUOTE]Yes, by all means, everyone thought letting criminals steal, defunding the police, and giving drug addicts welfare money were great ideas. Lies #1 through 3. And passing new "anti-woke" laws are going to fix it? Lie #4.
San Francisco is not blue. Lie #5. It is not progressive. Lie #6. It is anti-woke. Lie #7.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2900970]you know, like Trump's two fisted, hand pumping from side-to-side, [b]jerking-off two dicks simultaneously happy[/b]and tackling some of it's problems and not running away from them, because Trump tells them "...when and how high to jump".[/QUOTE]Trump has nothing to do with San Francisco's mess. Lie #8. And Trump followers picked him out over the establishment picks like Jeb Bush in 2016 which means they are free thinking not mind numbed robots. Lie #9.
But the biggest lie is the one you told yourself. We Democrats are smarter than Trump followers. Yeah, we know you think that. Maybe you can do us a favor. If we are so stupid, why don't you douches quit moving into red states?
[QUOTE=Spidy;2900970]Yes the border bill, the one with bipartisan support in the Senate (when I said it passed, I misspoke). The same one that had everything Repubs, wanted for US Border Security. The very same one,
[b]Biden shamed Repubs with,[/b] in his brilliant SOTU speech. The very same one, Trump ordered the House Repubs to put the kibosh on, where it was basically DOA in the House!
[b]Donald Trump brags about his efforts to scuttle bipartisan border deal[/b]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/01/27/trump-border-biden/[/URL]
Yes, that border bill, [b]the one Trump put the kibosh on![/b][/QUOTE]Lie #10 is Democrats claiming there were no border problems. But yeah, how could Republicans be that stupid to be opposed to a border bill when there is such an issue with the border?
[QUOTE=Spidy;2900970]A bipartisan group of House lawmakers is amplifying its calls for Speaker Mike Johnson to stage a vote on legislation linking foreign military aid with domestic border security, framing that combination as the only recipe for getting Ukraine assistance through a deeply divided Congress.[/QUOTE]Oh, so that is why. Lie #11 Spidy is you are saying this is just a "border" bill as opposed to a spending bill with tens of billions on Ukrainian and Israeli aid.
So there is nothing to debate. It is just the same old Dems good, Republicans bad over and over, and when the facts show that is not the case, you lie and insult. Questner is right. There is no discussion of ideas.
The debate about the border bill is Biden wants money to be given to Ukraine free and clear and wants to attach said aid to the USA border. Trump wants Ukrainian aid to be a loan not a gift and is not willing to cede any border authority to Biden after he rescinded Trump's executive orders.
We are so used to you douches we can predict your response. Biden is a genius, and Trump is a moron. The end. And that is why we do not need to post. We already know what you are going to say.
-
HRC LMAO BTW why doesn't he call himself that anymore lololol
"First off, it is one thing to blame or credit a president with anything. Blaming Trump for the pandemic or giving Biden credit for going back to work after lockdowns ended is folly to me. You need to explain to me what said president did to affect the positive or negative change. Unlike the douches with their Republicans bad / Dems good diatribe, I can give Dems credit. Clinton raised taxes, balanced the budget, and made the economy went boom. The irony is the Clintons have gone from populism to elitists IMO and that is why HRC lost.
The latest Democrat twist is to say there is not an issue with the border.
So is the border problem Biden's fault? To that, the facts show not just yes but hell yes.
The EO also revoked the following executive actions:
Executive Order 13767, issued on January 25,2017, which directed executive agencies to secure the southern border and prevent illegal immigration into the United States, and called for immediate construction of a wall along the southern border.
Proclamation 9880, issued on May 8, 2019, which deemed immigrants who entered the United States without inspection ineligible for asylum.
Presidential Memorandum of April 29,2019, which prevented certain asylum seekers from pursuing any other form of immigration relief, required adjudication of asylum cases within 180 days of filing, imposed an application fee for asylum claims, and barred asylum seekers who entered the United States without inspection from receiving work authorization while their applications were pending.
Presidential Memorandum of April 6, 2018, which prevented DHS from releasing immigrants from detention while their immigration cases were pending.
Presidential Memorandum of April 4, 2018, which deployed the National Guard to secure the southwest border.
So yeah, Biden owns the border mess.
Seeing as how Democratic douches love attacking sources, the guy making this video is very pro-Ukraine. He has a Ukrainian wife and made videos condemning Putin. He is part of the group that is the new media because at this point, the mainstream is so bad that you know what they are going to say before they say it.
For me, the video was confirmation that the people ending up on the border seeking asylum are from all over the world and are not Mexican. It is an organized effort to skirt American law that benefits Mexican drug cartels. RFK Jr. Had a video showing the same thing.
If you ever want to know what Trump derangement syndrome is, you cannot get it any better than with the wall. Trump used tax payer dollars to buy supplies to build the wall. The Biden administration came in and literally said we are not going to use any of the materials that the Trump administration bought, and those supplies are sitting there to this day. Yes, the Biden administration is that fucking petty and that stupid. This video shows said supplies.
What has not been shown is illegal immigrants coming in wearing Biden t-shirts, but I am sure I will see one showing that.
Between this and Merrick Garland's latest speech condemning the use of voter ID laws shows the great criminal enterprise Biden is undertaking. He is literally allowing illegals to come into the USA to vote for him and paying them off with USA tax dollars. It is not even subtle.
Like you see with the Democratic douches here, they do not care if it is only Americans voting in the election. All they care about is if their side wins.
In 2020, if I were a judge, I would be skeptical of having to step in and possibly overturn an election, but the Dems have made it easy now with the complete fucking idiocy that went on in Colorado and Maine where Trump was tried to be taken off the ballot. And we have seen Dems weaponize the justice system to go after Trump and all these cases that just happen to materialize right before the election? At least in 2020 if there was massive cheating, it was hidden well enough that judges could not act. Now it is out in the open, and they are going to have to act if there are issues in the election. Well, at this point, we know there will be horrific cheating. It is just how well can it be hidden.
Quite frankly, with Biden mouthing off to the Supreme Court last night and openly bragging about and defying them with student loan forgiveness, I do not think judges will sit on the sidelines this time.
Dems were given a 9 to 0 loss the last time they tried to cheat and win an election without having it decided by voters.
So here is the video on the border that some here have suggested is not a problem:
It is very much worth watching. ".
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/02/12/former-democrat-dennis-kucinich-joe-bidens-reprehensible-border-agenda-plan-drive-down-wages/[/URL]
-
The GOP/Repub mass exodus has begun...
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2901350]Why would anyone want to debate you fools? It is more fun just to watch you guys lie to each other and jerk each other off.
Yes, by all means, everyone thought letting criminals steal, defunding the police, and giving drug addicts welfare money were great ideas. Lies #1 through 3. And passing new "anti-woke" laws are going to fix it? Lie #4.
San Francisco is not blue. Lie #5. It is not progressive. Lie #6. It is anti-woke. Lie #7.
Trump has nothing to do with San Francisco's mess. Lie #8. And Trump followers picked him out over the establishment picks like Jeb Bush in 2016 which means they are free thinking not mind numbed robots. Lie #9.
But the biggest lie is the one you told yourself. We Democrats are smarter than Trump followers. Yeah, we know you think that. Maybe you can do us a favor. If we are so stupid, why don't you douches quit moving into red states?
Lie #10 is Democrats claiming there were no border problems. But yeah, how could Republicans be that stupid to be opposed to a border bill when there is such an issue with the border?
Oh, so that is why. Lie #11 Spidy is you are saying this is just a "border" bill as opposed to a spending bill with tens of billions on Ukrainian and Israeli aid.
So there is nothing to debate. It is just the same old Dems good, Republicans bad over and over, and when the facts show that is not the case, you lie and insult. Questner is right. There is no discussion of ideas.
The debate about the border bill is Biden wants money to be given to Ukraine free and clear and wants to attach said aid to the USA border. Trump wants Ukrainian aid to be a loan not a gift and is not willing to cede any border authority to Biden after he rescinded Trump's executive orders.
We are so used to you douches we can predict your response. Biden is a genius, and Trump is a moron. The end. And that is why we do not need to post. We already know what you are going to say.[/QUOTE]Well due to the recent Repub [B]"blood bath"[/B], it seems Repub Congressman, Ken Buck (R-CO), has had enough of his fellow, "do nothing", "know nothing", non-serious MAGA Repubs and is out of there, gone, exit-stage-left.
Know doubt, his dutifully and inconvenient exit, does somewhat hamstring, christo fascist House Speaker, Mike Johnson, torching his party, on his way out the door. Could this be like Moses, parting the Rea Sea, where dear ol' Ken Buck, is paving the way for his fellow Repubs, to cross the great political divide?
The only question is, how many more "normiees" and "moderates", will follow him out the door? Perhaps thereby, inevitably giving the Dems the House, [B]so serious[/B] work, policies and legislation can be performed, in stead of this Repub clown show?
[B]No lies needed[/B], Repubs have succumb to their own cowardice!
-
USA polotics
[QUOTE=Spidy;2901425]Well due to the recent Repub [B]"blood bath"[/B], it seems Repub Congressman, Ken Buck (R-CO), has had enough of his fellow, "do nothing", "know nothing", non-serious MAGA Repubs and is out of there, gone, exit-stage-left.
Know doubt, his dutifully and inconvenient exit, does somewhat hamstring, christo fascist House Speaker, Mike Johnson, torching his party, on his way out the door. Could this be like Moses, parting the Rea Sea, where dear ol' Ken Buck, is paving the way for his fellow Repubs, to cross the great political divide?
The only question is, how many more "normiees" and "moderates", will follow him out the door? Perhaps thereby, inevitably giving the Dems the House, [B]so serious[/B] work, policies and legislation can be performed, in stead of this Repub clown show?
[B]No lies needed[/B], Repubs have succumb to their own cowardice![/QUOTE]As an Aussie that is intrigued by US politics.
I only watch Fox for a start. But have seen CNN and other stations talk absolute tripe. Like they call Illegals. Who murder your innocents. Newcomers. Geeze please. And literally bag Trump for wanting to return these grubs. And wanting to MAGA.
From what I see with my own eyes and this can't be misinformation. Biden is completely fucked and could not run the raffle at my local footy club.
Yet the Dems turn a blind eye to all his obvious short comings.(fuck I laugh when he forgets everything or walks into the bushes or just falls off his bike) they would be the Hunter Biden Laptop and the Emails from Hillary Clinton. The whole world laughs at this.
Then there is the poor people who did nothing wrong who are still in jail after supposedly storming the capital on the 6th January. All of which has been proven to be a travesty. But wait it gets better. Floyd is a hero.
The world has one chance to survive.. TRUMP.
-
Lol
[QUOTE=Tlito;2901444]As an Aussie that is intrigued by US politics.
I only watch Fox for a start. But have seen CNN and other stations talk absolute tripe. Like they call Illegals. Who murder your innocents. Newcomers. Geeze please. And literally bag Trump for wanting to return these grubs. And wanting to MAGA.
From what I see with my own eyes and this can't be misinformation. Biden is completely fucked and could not run the raffle at my local footy club..[/QUOTE]Clearly and inarguably, you have been shovel-fed a load of total crap from whatever it is you think is "news."
"I only watch Fox for a start."
Yep, what you have seen and absorbed is most definitely misinformation.
Biden vs Trump?
Please provide a clip of Biden to rival anything like these from Trump:
[B]Trump's Best Words: 2017 Edition[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/MjZHDcKCA-I?si=bUzHwc6jGrOZqcGL[/URL]
[B]Trump's Best Words: 2018 Edition[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/MfOQBY5BrUA?si=bioLuGDwLWnetGzl[/URL]
[B]Trump's Best Words: 2019 Edition[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/UE9BXkQ-SRc?si=NjT5lyHycvBqyDKp[/URL]
[B]Trump's Best Words: Bracket Edition[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/Ftpc4fwcDfk?si=BHaaq68TWss9e_Q3[/URL]
[B]Oh, then you must have seen this on Fux, right? Nikki Haley Nikki.Haley Nikki Haley, his Repub nomination rival, never was Speaker of the House. Nope. He apparently means Nancy Pelosi[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/AwWFuPsSHFw?si=a0d-jOPjH8F3uwbq[/URL]
[B]A recent serious Trump brain malfunction[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/3Cqa1y3U8-0?si=Pn10t0Nt_F_9PH82[/URL]
[B]Trump repeatedly confuses Obama with Biden and warns of the pending WWII[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/rEP3z5xStE4?si=AOHkllvxnv7heB2C[/URL]
There are hours of fully covered, no tight editing, blithering incoherence like this from Trump in just the past 7 years while there is virtually none from Biden over the course of decades on the political stage.
So you really think Trump defunding and eliminating the celebrated Early Warning / Pandemic Prevention monitors from those Chinese labs by September 2019, against all expert warnings not to do something so dangerous and stupid, allowing the Chinese to keep the earliest emerging cases of Covid a secret, which was exactly what those teams were placed there to Prevent, was the decision of a mentally competent world leader simply trying to Make America Great Again?
Uh. Yeah, you need to stop watching Fux News ASAP. Watching nothing at all would keep you better informed than subjecting your eyes and ears to even 10 minutes of Fux News per week.
Here is a bonus clip for you of those "poor people who did nothing wrong" at the behest of Donald Trump while Donald Trump sat on his rump for more than 3 hours of this doing absolutely nothing to stop it despite the pleas from his staff and family members to do so:
[URL]https://youtu.be/Iludfj6Pe7w?si=9UuYNpcSVcPH4Xc2[/URL]
I assume you and others supposedly from civilized countries got a big laugh out of that, too, huh?
-
Well
[QUOTE=Tlito;2901444]The world has one chance to survive.. TRUMP.[/QUOTE]Though living down under you're fully indoctrinated. But you have another step to take, and that's to get a pair of these shoes so you can signal to all in your part of the world what you stand for. Now the gold ones are sold out for now, but if you scroll down you'll see other models. You might also want to go for a bottle of the Victory 47 cologne, a bit steep at $99 but the screw on cap is a bust of Trump so don't complain too much.
[URL]https://gettrumpsneakers.com/[/URL]
-
Quote?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2901350]
[QUOTE=NOT MY QUOTE]A bipartisan group of House lawmakers is amplifying its calls for Speaker Mike Johnson to stage a vote on legislation linking foreign military aid with domestic border security, framing that combination as the only recipe for getting Ukraine assistance through a deeply divided Congress.[/QUOTE]
Oh, so that is why. Lie #11 Spidy is you are saying this is just a "border" bill as opposed to a spending bill with tens of billions on Ukrainian and Israeli aid. [/QUOTE]
Yeah not my [b]"A bipartisan group..."[/b] quote, Elvis 2008! Try again?
-
As intrigued by Aussie politics... at times!
[QUOTE=Tlito;2901444]As an Aussie that is intrigued by US politics.
I only watch Fox for a start. But have seen CNN and other stations talk absolute tripe. [/QUOTE] Not to worry! You're not alone, as others here, [b]also suffer[/b] from the [b]same affliction,[/b] when they watch too much FOXY Muse. Easy to understand, as Rupert Murdoch's far-reaching right-wing media empire, is insidious, and in many corners of the world.
[QUOTE=Tlito;2901444]Like they call Illegals. Who murder your innocents. Newcomers. Geeze please. And literally bag Trump ...
The world has one chance to survive.. TRUMP.[/QUOTE]
As for the rest of your post, I translated it as, someone who OBVIOUSLY, likes being lied to, by right-wing media.
You know, the ones that lie to you, spread misinformation, ask you to send them money, have [b]$787 million dollar defamation lawsuit for [u]lying[/u] to Americans[/b] and yet another 30 or more lawsuits, for sexual harassment, wrongful termination, libel, slander and other defamation lawsuits. Who's lies are continuously rebutted, debunked and exposed, without so much as an ounce of journalist integrity, to release a public retraction of misrepresentation or guilt!
Yeah, those bogus right-wing media outlets!
Again...well not to worry, it's not the first time and it want be the last, propaganda right-wing media, like FOXY Muse, will lie to you. [b]After all...[/b]it would seem their unspoken motto is, akin to something Mark Twain said:
[QUOTE]"A lie, can get half-way around the world, [b]before the truth[/b] has a chance to put it's boots on" -- Mark Twain[/QUOTE]
From one right-wing [b]visionless[/b] fmr. US President, to another [b]short sighted boss[/b], in the quasi penultimate words of, Aussie's fmr. PM Scott Morrison, [i]"...but by all means, have the world's biggest battery, have the world's big banana, have the worlds greatest prawn..."[/i]
Explain to me though, why is it, right-wing leaders, dictators, fascist, authoritarian, tyrants and despots, [i][b]"visions of a future",[/b][/i] is always looking BACKWARDS?
[u]Aussie's Outlook is a Bright One:[/u]
[LIST]BTW, I do like however, what your new Labor Gov't, Aussie billionaires, like Mike Cannon-Brookes and Andrew "Twiggy" Forrest are doing, with regards to making inroads into cleaner, renewable energy (like solar, wind, hydrogen to a lesser degree and EV adoption), to provide a better, quicker and more responsive electricity grid stabilization and energy independence, for Australians, who were paying obscenely high prices for electricity, under a Scott Morrison, gov't and the coal pica plant, oligarchs.[/LIST]
-
Oh come on
[QUOTE=Spidy;2901552]Not to worry! You're not alone, as others here, [b]also suffer[/b] from the [b]same affliction![/b] As Rupert Murdoch's far-reaching media empire, is insidious, in many corners of the world.
As for the rest of your post, I translated it as, someone who OBVIOUSLY, likes being lied to, by right-wing media.
You know, the ones that lie to you, spread misinformation, ask you to send them money, have [b]$787 million dollar defamation lawsuit for [u]lying[/u] to Americans[/b] and yet another 30 or more lawsuits, for sexual harassment, wrongful termination, libel, slander and other defamation lawsuits. Who's lies are continuously rebutted, debunked and exposed, without so much as an ounce of journalist integrity, to release a public retraction of misrepresentation or guilt! Yeah, those bogus right-wing media outlets!
Well not to worry, it's not the first time and it want be the last, propaganda right-wing media, like FOXY Muse, will lie to you. [b]After all...[/b]it would seem their unspoken motto is, akin to something Mark Twain said:
From one right-wing visionless fmr. US President, to another short sighted former boss, in Aussie's fmr. PM Scott Morrison, [i]"...but by all means, have the world's biggest battery, have the world's big banana, have the worlds greatest prawn..."[/i]
Explain to me though, why is it, right-wing leaders, dictators, fascist, authoritarian, tyrants and despots, [i][b]"visions of a future",[/b][/i] is always looking BACKWARDS?
[u]Aussie's Outlook is a Bright One:[/u]
[LIST]BTW, I do like however, what your new Labor Gov't, Aussie billionaires, like Mike Cannon-Brookes and Andrew "Twiggy" Forrest are doing, with regards to making inroads into cleaner, renewable energy (like solar, wind, hydrogen to a lesser degree and EV adoption), to provide a better, quicker and more responsive electricity grid stabilization and energy independence, for Australians, who were paying obscenely high prices for electricity, under a Scott Morrison, gov't and the coal pica plant, oligarchs.[/LIST][/QUOTE]Now now. Are you really suggesting that someone who has concluded something as blitheringly nonsensical as that historic economic, national security, health recovery, jobs creation and wage gains, violent crime reduction and democratic alliance NATO expansion President Joe Biden's obvious shortcomings no one should ignore in favor of supporting historic WORST economic and national security results of all time Donald Trump are "Hunter Biden's laptop and Hillary Clinton's emails" has been suckered and bamboozled into a pathetic state of astonishing misinformation by his beloved Fux News?
That is so unfair.
-
Trump's VP is not endorsing Trump's version of MAGA anymore
Naturally, as a Classic Conservative Repub, Piety Mike Pence is proud of his Trump Administration's record of laying the groundwork for, exacerbating and lying the world into an unprecedented Worldwide Deadly and Economically Disastrous Trump's Pandemic, mass murdering at least a million Americans, wiping out Tens of Millions of Jobs, passing only one economic "stimulus" legislation that added Trillions to the deficit but produced a million fewer jobs with it than without it even before his economic and national security decisions and lies in 2018,2019 and 2020 created Trump's Pandemic and all the historic spikes in Inflation, Border Crossings and Crime Levels that followed, siding with Putin and other authoritarian dictators over America at every turn including the 37+ times Trump went limp dick on Putin to the point of secretly trying to eliminate the sanctions imposed against Russia and publicly rewarding Russia for invading Georgia and Crimea as well as engaging in unprecedented collusion with Team Trump in order to put him in the White House and, of course, keeping America and the USA Military actively and directly engaged in a ground War in the Middle East for every minute of every hour of every day of its term in office along with breaking his Oath of Office to encite a violent, cop-attacking and cop-killing Insurrection against America to overturn a free and fair election and overthrow American democracy.
What Classic Conservative Repub would not be incredibly proud of those accomplishments that, among others, has led a bi-partisan consensus of American Presidential Historians to accurately judge Trump to be The Worst USA President of All Time?
[B]Mike Pence won't endorse Donald Trump in 2024: 'It should come as no surprise'.
March 16, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mike-pence-endorse-donald-trump-2024-surprise/story?id=108167592[/URL]
[QUOTE]"Look, I'm incredibly proud of the record of our administration," Pence said. "It was a conservative record that made America more prosperous, more secure and saw conservatives appointed to our courts in a more peaceful world."[/QUOTE]Maybe it was that thingy about his boss being fine with and even encouraging those "poor people who did nothing wrong" breaking into the Capitol in a search for Pence in order to publicly hang him by neck until dead for daring not to violate the Constitution at Trump's illegal request.
Sure, sure, he won't ever endorse and vote for Biden because, you know, there is that Historic Economic Recovery and Jobs Creation thing about him that Classic Conservative Repubs hate so much.
Or maybe it is just his constant worry about those Hunter Biden dick pics in his laptop and those disturbing Hillary Clinton emails detailing the color scheme and food selection for her daughter's wedding.
-
I'm intrigued of people who only watch Fox!
[QUOTE=Tlito;2901444]As an Aussie that is intrigued by US politics.
I only watch Fox for a start. [/QUOTE]Who are these people? What took away their sense of reasoning and ability to think for themselves? Did they ever stand a chance?
Sad!
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2901467]
So you really think Trump defunding and eliminating the celebrated Early Warning / Pandemic Prevention monitors from those Chinese labs by September 2019, against all expert warnings not to do something so dangerous and stupid, allowing the Chinese to keep the earliest emerging cases of Covid a secret, which was exactly what those teams were placed there to Prevent, was the decision of a mentally competent world leader simply trying to Make America Great Again?[/QUOTE]Here is a video showing when all the experts lied to us: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMaHKykfdcQ[/URL].
1. 15 days to stop the spread of Covid.
2. Not needing masks. Then flip flopping.
3. Vaccines not being mandated.
4. Masks not being mandated.
5. Kids should not be in school.
6. Vaccines will end Covid.
7. Vaccines do not affect menstrual health.
8. No more masks after vaccines.
9. Lying about what gain of function is.
10. Pandemic of the unvaccinated.
And again, this is why it is not worth debating you guys. After all these bullshit lies from the "experts", you still believe that that the issue with the pandemic was Trump not listening to these same "experts" even when it was a worldwide pandemic.
That could be my new Democratic douche slogan: liars saying we should listen to other liars.
-
Thanks Spidy
[QUOTE=Spidy;2901552]Not to worry! You're not alone, as others here, [b]also suffer[/b] from the [b]same affliction,[/b] when they watch too much FOXY Muse. Easy to understand, as Rupert Murdoch's far-reaching right-wing media empire, is insidious, and in many corners of the world.
As for the rest of your post, I translated it as, someone who OBVIOUSLY, likes being lied to, by right-wing media.
You know, the ones that lie to you, spread misinformation, ask you to send them money, have [b]$787 million dollar defamation lawsuit for [u]lying[/u] to Americans[/b] and yet another 30 or more lawsuits, for sexual harassment, wrongful termination, libel, slander and other defamation lawsuits. Who's lies are continuously rebutted, debunked and exposed, without so much as an ounce of journalist integrity, to release a public retraction of misrepresentation or guilt!
Yeah, those bogus right-wing media outlets!
Again...well not to worry, it's not the first time and it want be the last, propaganda right-wing media, like FOXY Muse, will lie to you. [b]After all...[/b]it would seem their unspoken motto is, akin to something Mark Twain said:
From one right-wing [b]visionless[/b] fmr. US President, to another [b]short sighted boss[/b], in the quasi penultimate words of, Aussie's fmr. PM Scott Morrison, [i]"...but by all means, have the world's biggest battery, have the world's big banana, have the worlds greatest prawn..."[/i]
Explain to me though, why is it, right-wing leaders, dictators, fascist, authoritarian, tyrants and despots, [i][b]"visions of a future",[/b][/i] is always looking BACKWARDS?
[u]Aussie's Outlook is a Bright One:[/u]
[LIST]BTW, I do like however, what your new Labor Gov't, Aussie billionaires, like Mike Cannon-Brookes and Andrew "Twiggy" Forrest are doing, with regards to making inroads into cleaner, renewable energy (like solar, wind, hydrogen to a lesser degree and EV adoption), to provide a better, quicker and more responsive electricity grid stabilization and energy independence, for Australians, who were paying obscenely high prices for electricity, under a Scott Morrison, gov't and the coal pica plant, oligarchs.[/LIST][/QUOTE]Yes it is a tough one. Unfortunately. Who knows what is real.
As far as Aussie politics go. Seriously our leaders just follow America and hope you are right.
I don't know.
Cheers Mate. Fingers crossed That honesty wins out.
-
Cheers Eihtooms
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2901467]Clearly and inarguably, you have been shovel-fed a load of total crap from whatever it is you think is "news."
"I only watch Fox for a start."
Yep, what you have seen and absorbed is most definitely misinformation.
Biden vs Trump?
Please provide a clip of Biden to rival anything like these from Trump:
[B]Trump's Best Words: 2017 Edition[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/MjZHDcKCA-I?si=bUzHwc6jGrOZqcGL[/URL]
[B]Trump's Best Words: 2018 Edition[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/MfOQBY5BrUA?si=bioLuGDwLWnetGzl[/URL]
[B]Trump's Best Words: 2019 Edition[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/UE9BXkQ-SRc?si=NjT5lyHycvBqyDKp[/URL]
[B]Trump's Best Words: Bracket Edition[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/Ftpc4fwcDfk?si=BHaaq68TWss9e_Q3[/URL]
[B]Oh, then you must have seen this on Fux, right? Nikki Haley Nikki.Haley Nikki Haley, his Repub nomination rival, never was Speaker of the House. Nope. He apparently means Nancy Pelosi[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/AwWFuPsSHFw?si=a0d-jOPjH8F3uwbq[/URL]
[B]A recent serious Trump brain malfunction[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/3Cqa1y3U8-0?si=Pn10t0Nt_F_9PH82[/URL]
[B]Trump repeatedly confuses Obama with Biden and warns of the pending WWII[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/rEP3z5xStE4?si=AOHkllvxnv7heB2C[/URL]
There are hours of fully covered, no tight editing, blithering incoherence like this from Trump in just the past 7 years while there is virtually none from Biden over the course of decades on the political stage.
So you really think Trump defunding and eliminating the celebrated Early Warning / Pandemic Prevention monitors from those Chinese labs by September 2019, against all expert warnings not to do something so dangerous and stupid, allowing the Chinese to keep the earliest emerging cases of Covid a secret, which was exactly what those teams were placed there to Prevent, was the decision of a mentally competent world leader simply trying to Make America Great Again?
Uh. Yeah, you need to stop watching Fux News ASAP. Watching nothing at all would keep you better informed than subjecting your eyes and ears to even 10 minutes of Fux News per week.
Here is a bonus clip for you of those "poor people who did nothing wrong" at the behest of Donald Trump while Donald Trump sat on his rump for more than 3 hours of this doing absolutely nothing to stop it despite the pleas from his staff and family members to do so:
[URL]https://youtu.be/Iludfj6Pe7w?si=9UuYNpcSVcPH4Xc2[/URL]
I assume you and others supposedly from civilized countries got a big laugh out of that, too, huh?[/QUOTE]Sorry Mate.
I love your reply to my genuine post.
And I am very open minded.
But ha ha.
Are these posts I am seeing of the leader of the free world edited to make him look like a person who is not able to run a chook raffle. Is he really ok. Please answer this. He falls over. Can't put two words together. Reads off cards. Keeps keeps keeps saying I will get into trouble if I answer this. Refuses point blank to debate. Because he is not able. Not able. Not able.
Are all the people coming into the US over the border.(newcomers) good people. How come I see thousands of young men and a few ladies. I saw on FOX where young girls were laid on a bed and fucked all day. As part of Bidens Newcomer Policy. A million children are shipped into your great country and just disappear. Into the sex trafficking industry. Is this all misinformation.
Are all the people locked up. STILL from January 6th. Worse than the other criminals walking freely around the US. Robbing murdering and just doing what ever they like. While you are oversees fucking.
Mate I am an old bloke who sees the truth.
Let me tell you right now.
If Trump does not win the next election the world is fucked.
I was watching Aussie SKY TV one day and the boss of the greens (one of our major political parties) refused to stand in front of the Aussie flag. Not one free to air station ever showed it.(that is when I realised how much our media determines).
The media is turning you into someone who bags Aussies for their opinion.(think about it).
-
Yes, Biden is really okay and Trump is really a blithering idiot
[QUOTE=Tlito;2901618]Sorry Mate.
I love your reply to my genuine post.
And I am very open minded.
But ha ha.
Are these posts I am seeing of the leader of the free world edited to make him look like a person who is not able to run a chook raffle. Is he really ok. Please answer this. He falls over. Can't put two words together. Reads off cards. Keeps keeps keeps saying I will get into trouble if I answer this. Refuses point blank to debate. Because he is not able. Not able. Not able.
Are all the people coming into the US over the border.(newcomers) good people. How come I see thousands of young men and a few ladies. I saw on FOX where young girls were laid on a bed and fucked all day. As part of Bidens Newcomer Policy. A million children are shipped into your great country and just disappear. Into the sex trafficking industry. Is this all misinformation.
Are all the people locked up. STILL from January 6th. Worse than the other criminals walking freely around the US. Robbing murdering and just doing what ever they like. While you are oversees fucking.
Mate I am an old bloke who sees the truth.
Let me tell you right now.
If Trump does not win the next election the world is fucked.
I was watching Aussie SKY TV one day and the boss of the greens (one of our major political parties) refused to stand in front of the Aussie flag. Not one free to air station ever showed it.(that is when I realised how much our media determines).
The media is turning you into someone who bags Aussies for their opinion.(think about it).[/QUOTE]Here is the President that idiot Trump and your Fux News has apparently convinced you can't put two words together:
[B]President Biden's State of the Union Address, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/cplSUhU2avc?si=0X0xJyjy2eZYRrnH[/URL]
This is the best that Trump's Party had to offer as a response:
[B]Alabama Republican Senator Katie Britt delivers the GOP response to the SOTU[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/jqMyaE6kmKo?si=LeWlldN9NboXQX86[/URL]
And you might be interested to know that the best that Trump's Party had to offer was lying through her teeth about her breathlessly scary story about the young girl being gang raped in the USA by drug runners let in by Joe Biden. Surprised? You wouldn't be if you watched some Real News sources every now and then. It turns out the young girl was not raped in the USA, it happened in Mexico. And it didn't happen during Joe Biden's presidency, it happened during Repub GW Bush's so-called presidency and not during Joe Biden's presidency:
[B]Katie Britt Accused of 'Whopping Lie' in SOTU Response[/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/katie-britt-accused-whopping-lie-sotu-response-1877591[/URL]
Also, I don't know who all these news sources are that you claim only refer to the border crossing asylum-seekers that Biden is required by the USA Constitution to investigate for their claim of seeking asylum and can not just be turned away, a process that Trump's decimation of the legal Immigration system has caused that process to take years instead of weeks and that Trump demanded his Repub-controlled House of Representatives to KEEP IT THAT WAY, as "newcomers".
Meanwhile, where is all this out-of-control crime being committed by them supposedly taking place anyway?
[B]Facts still matter: Data shows sanctuary cities keep communities safer.
Feb. 2020[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/481851-facts-still-matter-data-shows-sanctuary-cities-keep-communities-safer/[/URL]
[B]Most people think the U.S. crime rate is rising. They're wrong.
Almost 80 percent of Americans, and 92 percent of Republicans, think crime has gone up. It actually fell in 2023. An expert blames a familiar culprit for the mistaken impression.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/people-think-crime-rate-up-actually-down-rcna129585[/URL]
[B]'It is historic': US poised to see record drop in yearly homicides despite public concern over crime.
The year is expected to end with over 2,000 fewer murders than in 2022.[/B]
[URL]https://abcnews.go.com/US/homicide-numbers-poised-hit-record-decline-nationwide-americans/story?id=105556400[/URL]
Oh, and here are bonus links for when Trump killed the bi-partisan comprehensive Immigration Reform efforts not once but twice in the past 6 years, because he loves Open Borders so much:
[B]Trump rejects immigration compromise.
June, 2018[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/trump-immigration-compromise/index.html[/URL]
[B]'Immoral': Some Republicans rebuke efforts to kill immigration deal to help Trump.
The fight over an emerging border and foreign aid bill grew tense Thursday as the GOP split over whether to sink the deal to boost Donald Trump's presidential campaign.
Jan. 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/immoral-republicans-rebuke-efforts-kill-immigration-deal-help-trump-rcna135732[/URL]
Debates? Biden has not ruled out any debates. Who told you that? You might want to sit down for this; Donald Trump hid in his basement to avoid debating Joe Biden in 2020 and ran for cover from every GOP primary debate even against an opponent he characterized as a "birdbrain" this very year.
What on earth would Trump talk about in a debate aside from rattling off one lie after another? The glorious future of Covfefe with him at the helm again?
-
Fox Truth
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2901576]Who are these people? What took away their sense of reasoning and ability to think for themselves? Did they ever stand a chance?
Sad![/QUOTE]Sorry Mate.
I just see the truth on Fox.
What are you watching please.
Do you watch a station that shows Biden being honest.
Young.
Coherent.
Not letting really bad people into your country.
Is this all misinformation.
-
Ha ha ha
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2901576]Who are these people? What took away their sense of reasoning and ability to think for themselves? Did they ever stand a chance?
Sad![/QUOTE]Mate.
What do you watch.
Do you watch a station that shows Biden as a smart man who does not let criminals into YOUR country to murder your children.
Sorry Mate.
Am I watching lies on Fox that show that Biden is the worst president the US has ever had.
Ha.
-
Smart man, always bet on the red team
"As an Aussie that is intrigued by US politics.
I only watch Fox for a start. But have seen CNN and other stations talk absolute tripe. Like they call Illegals. Who murder your innocents. Newcomers. Geeze please. And literally bag Trump for wanting to return these grubs. And wanting to MAGA.
From what I see with my own eyes and this can't be misinformation. Biden is completely fucked and could not run the raffle at my local footy club.
Yet the Dems turn a blind eye to all his obvious short comings. (fuck I laugh when he forgets everything or walks into the bushes or just falls off his bike) they would be the Hunter Biden Laptop and the Emails from Hillary Clinton. The whole world laughs at this.
Then there is the poor people who did nothing wrong who are still in jail after supposedly storming the capital on the 6th January. All of which has been proven to be a travesty. But wait it gets better. Floyd is a hero.
The world has one chance to survive. TRUMP. ".
[URL]https://www.aol.com/news/opinion-us-brink-another-civil-174055045.html[/URL]
Inshallah!!
-
The list keeps growing
Seriously, what does it say about a nominee's fitness for Office as well as the verifiable and defensible record results of his previous term that every VP of the 3 most recent Repub Presidencies, including his own, along with dozens of Cabinet-level and other members of his own administration who knew him well, worked next to him, observed him on a daily basis and know what he is up to and all about have gone public in opposing his re-election?
It really is astonishing, unprecedented in Presidential Electoral History. And so telling.
Damn. Just look at this list!
[B]List of Republicans who oppose the Donald Trump 2024 presidential campaign.[/B]
[URL]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Republicans_who_oppose_the_Donald_Trump_2024_presidential_campaign[/URL]
Yes, of course, in keeping with my usual non partisan openness to giving every Political Party a free and fair opportunity to win my vote and support based solely on each Party's long, long, long term record of results and never based solely on Party Affiliation, I entered the same Google Search topic for Joe. Biden's re-election campaign. And I even found a Fux News link for it, which I am happy to include here:
[B]List of Democrats opposed to Biden running for re-election grows with addition of vulnerable congresswoman.
Aug. 2022[/B]
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/list-democrats-opposed-biden-running-reelection-grows-addition-vulnerable-congresswoman[/URL]
[URL]https://theweek.com/joe-biden/1015407/democrats-challenge-biden-2024[/URL]
So, I found some lady named Craig, another one named Williamson and that Phillips guy, who ran a pathetic campaign for the Dem nomination vs Biden. Maybe that Williamson lady is running too, not sure. And I suppose she is or was a Dem, too. Again, not sure. And there is West and that anti-vax conspiracy theory weirdo RFK Jr. I have no idea what Party he belongs to anymore. Maybe the Pro Measles Party.
But I know none of them worked with Biden directly or were ever members of his administration.
-
That is absurd
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2901581]Here is a video showing when all the experts lied to us: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMaHKykfdcQ[/URL].
1. 15 days to stop the spread of Covid.
2. Not needing masks. Then flip flopping.
3. Vaccines not being mandated.
4. Masks not being mandated.
5. Kids should not be in school.
6. Vaccines will end Covid.
7. Vaccines do not affect menstrual health.
8. No more masks after vaccines.[/QUOTE]So you think that in the SAME MONTH that the so-called president Trump was grandly announcing his lie to the world that, "We've got this under control. It's no big deal blah blah blah" Dr. Fauci should have been recommending that every American run to the nearest drug store, buy up all the available masks and wear them at every opportunity?
Don't you and that dits narrating the video realize how idiotic someone sounds who is pushing that silliness?
Hey, I've got a little inside secret to share with you about the REALITY of Trump's Pandemic from someone who lived on the direct opposite side of the planet all through it:
There were CLOSURES throughout the entire country of Thailand. Schools were closed. Malls were closed. Restaurants were closed. For MONTHS if not YEARS at a time.
Masks were mandated virtually everywhere. As was Social Distancing.
Again, for months if not years.
An Economic Catastrophe? Holy shit yes. Bangkok, the most visited tourist destination city on Earth was a fucking ghost town for months if not years.
But here is the secret. Are you ready for this? Don't tell anyone else. Especially your beloved pro Repub Mainstream Media, ok?
Here goes:
Almost nobody here ever heard of Dr. Fauci.
Really.
They damn near barely heard of Joe Biden in early 2020.
They barely knew what a "Democrat" or a "Republican" was.
And they didn't care.
They had their own scientists, their own research teams, their own statistics on who was getting so ill they were flooding the private rooms in the private hospitals, who was dying from it and why, who was likely to carry it back to their friends and family, which regions it was spreading in most rapidly and why and on and on and on.
They were not "obeying" Dr. Fauci, Joe Biden or anyone in any other country. They were doing exactly what was necessary at every interval in order to reduce as many deaths as possible in THIS country until a time when a decent supply of vaccines that Trump was busy trying to convince the world were not necessary were here, available and then, guess what, they were mandated if you wanted to go anywhere, travel anywhere or enter a room with more than 5-10 other people in it.
Nothing whatsoever to do with the people you think caused you so much angst in America.
Shh. Don't tell anyone. Just keep up that silly ranting about how you were victimized by Dr. Fauci and Joe Biden.
-
Oh come on now...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2901637]Here is the President that idiot Trump and your Fux News has apparently convinced you can't put two words together:
[B]President Biden's State of the Union Address, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/cplSUhU2avc?si=0X0xJyjy2eZYRrnH[/URL]
This is the best that Trump's Party had to offer as a response:
[B]Alabama Republican Senator Katie Britt delivers the GOP response to the SOTU[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/jqMyaE6kmKo?si=LeWlldN9NboXQX86[/URL]
And you might be interested to know that the best that Trump's Party had to offer was lying through her teeth about her breathlessly scary story about the young girl being gang raped in the USA by drug runners let in by Joe Biden. Surprised? You wouldn't be if you watched some Real News sources every now and then. It turns out the young girl was not raped in the USA, it happened in Mexico. And it didn't happen during Joe Biden's presidency, it happened during Repub GW Bush's so-called presidency and not during Joe Biden's presidency:
[B]Katie Britt Accused of 'Whopping Lie' in SOTU Response[/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/katie-britt-accused-whopping-lie-sotu-response-1877591[/URL]
Also, I don't know who all these news sources are that you claim only refer to the border crossing asylum-seekers that Biden is required by the USA Constitution to investigate for their claim of seeking asylum and can not just be turned away, a process that Trump's decimation of the legal Immigration system has caused that process to take years instead of weeks and that Trump demanded his Repub-controlled House of Representatives to KEEP IT THAT WAY, as "newcomers".
Meanwhile, where is all this out-of-control crime being committed by them supposedly taking place anyway?
[B]Facts still matter: Data shows sanctuary cities keep communities safer. Feb. 2020[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/481851-facts-still-matter-data-shows-sanctuary-cities-keep-communities-safer/[/URL]
[B]Most people think the U.S. crime rate is rising. They're wrong.
Almost 80 percent of Americans, and 92 percent of Republicans, think crime has gone up. It actually fell in 2023. An expert blames a familiar culprit for the mistaken impression.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/people-think-crime-rate-up-actually-down-rcna129585[/URL]
[B]'It is historic': US poised to see record drop in yearly homicides despite public concern over crime.
The year is expected to end with over 2,000 fewer murders than in 2022.[/B]
[URL]https://abcnews.go.com/US/homicide-numbers-poised-hit-record-decline-nationwide-americans/story?id=105556400[/URL]
Oh, and here are bonus links for when Trump killed the bi-partisan comprehensive Immigration Reform efforts not once but twice in the past 6 years, because he loves Open Borders so much:
[B]Trump rejects immigration compromise. June, 2018[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/trump-immigration-compromise/index.html[/URL]
[B]'Immoral': Some Republicans rebuke efforts to kill immigration deal to help Trump.
The fight over an emerging border and foreign aid bill grew tense Thursday as the GOP split over whether to sink the deal to boost Donald Trump's presidential campaign.
Jan. 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/immoral-republicans-rebuke-efforts-kill-immigration-deal-help-trump-rcna135732[/URL]
Debates? Biden has not ruled out any debates. Who told you that? You might want to sit down for this; Donald Trump hid in his basement to avoid debating Joe Biden in 2020 and ran for cover from every GOP primary debate even against an opponent he characterized as a "birdbrain" this very year.
What on earth would Trump talk about in a debate aside from rattling off one lie after another? The glorious future of Covfefe with him at the helm again?[/QUOTE]
Are you really suggesting that a Trumpster, who has concluded something as moronically and blitheringly nonsensical in their head, would believe [b]REAL[/b] and [b]ACTUAL[/b] evidential facts, over their [b][i]"gut feelings"[/i][/b]?
Are you really suggesting that a Trumpster, know WHAT IS a world best historic US economic boom, best historical jobs creation that has held [i]unemployment below 4% for the longest stretch in 50 years in American history[/i], best uptick in factories built and US manufacturing expansion in decades, world best growth in AI Tech & chips, national security recovery, created lower and affordable health care costs, [b]reduced violent and property crime down to 15% and 7% [/b](in 2023, 339/1830 per 100K) respectively, democratic alliance NATO expansion, brought the US back to respectability on the world-stage, are all just President Joe Biden's obvious shortcomings?
And no one should ignore these shortcomings, in favor of supporting a historic WORST and largest US national debt, [b]WORST violent and property crime [/b](in 2020, 393/1960 per 100K respectively), WORST economic and US border/national security results of all time, by a 2x impeached 4x indicted LOSER in Donald Trump, who's administration's greatest accomplishment is "Hunter Biden's laptop", "Hillary Clinton's emails", "Italian spy satellites hacking voting machines", a recorded national anthem by criminally jailed cop-killers J6 insurrectionists and deep-fake FBI informants (aka.Russian's "useful idiots"), have ALL been suckered and bamboozled into a pathetic state of astonishing misinformation and disinformation, by his beloved FOXY Muse? And the rest of the know world, has it all wrong?
That is so unfair!
(...kkkk!)
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2901950]Nothing whatsoever to do with the people you think caused you so much angst in America.
Shh. Don't tell anyone. Just keep up that silly ranting about how you were victimized by Dr. Fauci and Joe Biden.[/QUOTE]LOL. I posted in real time all my great experiences in Mexico and Colombia during the pandemic on this website. I miss empty planes and no traffic. Where did you get that I was a victim and not women who got their hormone cycles fucked up by the vaccine nor children who were deprived of going to school from that video?
-
Who to blame?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2902031]LOL. I posted in real time all my great experiences in Mexico and Colombia during the pandemic on this website. I miss empty planes and no traffic. Where did you get that I was a victim and not women who got their hormone cycles fucked up by the vaccine nor children who were deprived of going to school from that video?[/QUOTE]The fallout and long term ripple effects from Trump's Pandemic, the missed months and years in school, the side effects (if any) from the rushed vaccines, the millions of deaths, the massive jobs and business destruction, the collapsed global supply-chains, the Inflation, all of it happened everywhere on Planet Earth, even places who never heard a word uttered by Dr. Fauci and Joe Biden and were not responding in any way to any perceived "lie" you have imagined and are obsessed with.
Those places all around the world were dealing with and responding to the reality of Trump's Pandemic as it happened in their part of the world, closures, mask mandates, social distancing mandates, vaccine mandates and all.
You want to find a villians, perpetrators and liars to blame for all of that harm and fallout?
Here, let me help you with that:
[B]Trump disbanded NSC pandemic unit that experts had praised.[/B]
[B]Trump administration cut pandemic early warning program in September (2019).
Predict project wound down three months before outbreak.[/B]
[URL]https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-ap-top-news-virus-outbreak-barack-obama-public-health-ce014d94b64e98b7203b873e56f80e9a[/URL]
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/03/trump-scrapped-pandemic-early-warning-program-system-before-coronavirus[/URL]
[B]Bob Woodward Was Stunned By What Trump Told Young Son Barron About Coronavirus.[/B]
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bob-woodward-stunned-trump-told-091902598.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]TRUMP: "It came out of China. And it shouldve been stopped. And to be honest with you, Barron, they shouldve let it be known it was a problem two months earlier ... the world wouldnt have a problem. We could have stopped it easily.[/QUOTE]And don't fall for the John Bolton clean up attempt when he nit picked over Trump's disastrous decision to eliminate that Early Warning / Pandemic Prevention system contrary to all expert dire warnings not to do something so dangerous and stupid as that. He didn't have to eliminate the "entire" team to do serious harm to it and the fact that some of them were transferred to the Pandemic "response" side is utterly and totally beside the point. They are playing you with word games.
Keeping Obama's Early Warning / Pandemic "Prevention" system in place was the point, in order to Prevent Trump's Pandemic from developing in the first place rather than merely leaving it to Trump to totally botch his response" to it, which he did.
Meanwhile, as far as Joe Biden's contribution to dealing with and responding to Trump's Pandemic and all of the disastrous fallout from it, you should only be praising the fact that HIS recovery from it has been and still is the Best and Strongest on Planet Earth.
Oh, and that very well might have been because he had Dr. Anthony Fauci in the USA to advise and contribute to that recovery while no other country did.
[B]U.S. Leads the World in Post-Pandemic Economic Recovery.[/B]
[URL]https://bearingdrift.com/2024/02/01/u-s-leads-the-world-in-post-pandemic-economic-recovery/[/URL]
Thanks, Joe, the Dems in Congress and Anthony.
-
Even Repub Chip Roy proclaims, the US Border Failure was TRUMP!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2901350]Lie #10 is Democrats claiming there were no border problems. But yeah, how could Republicans be that stupid to be opposed to a border bill when there is such an issue with the border?
Oh, so that is why. Lie #11 Spidy is you are saying this is just a "border" bill as opposed to a spending bill with tens of billions on Ukrainian and Israeli aid.
So there is nothing to debate. It is just the same old Dems good, Republicans bad over and over, and when the facts show that is not the case, you lie and insult. Questner is right. There is no discussion of ideas.
The debate about the border bill is Biden wants money to be given to Ukraine free and clear and wants to attach said aid to the USA border. Trump wants Ukrainian aid to be a loan not a gift and is not willing to cede any border authority to Biden after he rescinded Trump's executive orders.
We are so used to you douches we can predict your response. Biden is a genius, and Trump is a moron. The end. And that is why we do not need to post. We already know what you are going to say. [/QUOTE]
I believe this was, already smartly explained to you in some detail, here:
[QUOTE=EihTooms;][b]The emprical evidence is now overwhelming and impossible to ignore.[/b]
Who are the Dems asserting there is no issue with the border?
After Obama-Biden handed Trump the lowest rate of illegal crossings in 50 years, [b]then Trump's policies and stewardship[/b] twice spiked up those illegal crossings to near record highs, then [b]Trump decimated the legal Immigration system[/b] just as he was getting kicked out of office, which created the years long delays in investigating and processing asylum-seekers before turning back and deporting the fakers as is required by the USA Constitution, one of the first moves Biden made when he took over in the midst of still another "Once in 100 Years" Repub Disaster that only happens under Repubs and during virtually every Repub Presidency, was to propose and submit a plan for comprehensive Immigration Reform.
It never got an iota of interest from enough Congressional Repubs to even consider it much less pass it with the required 60 seats in the Senate.
So then the fully bipartisan-negotiated Border Bill recently submitted for Pink Tinkle House approval was killed by Trump when he ordered them to leave the borders Open and a Mess now and into the future, possibly forever, so he can use the issue to get back into the WH ...
[/QUOTE]
But hey don't take it from us Dems, listen to your own Repub Chip Roy (R-TX), Who reiterates the same things, EihTooms, outlines in his post. He blames the border problems and failures, ALL on TRUMP! And rightly so!
I especially like this 1-minute video [i](presented by an Australian, no less, just for Tlito, FWIW)[/i], with Chip Roy, [b]slamming Trump[/b], for not getting the job done when he had the chance. Although, I think he doesn't know diddly, about his US conspiracies.
[b]Mar 12th, 2024:[/b] GOP failed to secure the US border: [b]Chip Roy[/b]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RftlSWHBMg[/URL]
And just so we're CLEAR, for good measure...more of good ol' Chip Roy, slamming Trump and reminding Repubs and Elvis 2008, that it was [i]"TRUMP, WHO FAILED TO SECURE THE BORDER"[/i]
[b]Dec 20th, 2023:[/b] [u]Chip Roy[/u] Fires Back at Trump: Failed to Secure Border
[URL]https://www.mediaite.com/politics/chip-roy-rips-trump-over-his-failure-to-secure-border-says-he-would-get-his-clock-cleaned-in-debate/[/URL]
[LIST][i]"President [b]Trump also failed to actually fully secure the border.[/b] If we'd gotten the policies in place, if he had worked with conservatives to get bills passed in [b]2018-19[/b], we wouldn't be in the mess were in right now." -- Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX)[/i][/LIST][u]So Elvis 2008, with w/r to Border Security:[/u]
-- EihTooms, told you it was [b]TRUMP![/b]
-- I, told you it was [b]TRUMP! [/b]
-- Repub Chip Roy, is telling you, it was [b]TRUMP![/b] When Repubs had all 3-branches of gov't.
-- All evidence put forth is telling you, it has been and was ALWAYS [b]TRUMP,[/b] as far back as 2018!
-- Border security and immigration, is clearly, [b]TRUMP's[/b] very own little PET PROJECT!
Dude, just take the [b]HINT[/b] already...[b]it was TRUMP![/b]
-
Can't Secure bond
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-has-failed-get-appeal-bond-454-mln-civil-fraud-judgment-lawyers-say-2024-03-18/[/URL]
No one wants touch his assets, according to his court filing today.
Guess he's not liquid after all.
-
If dumb sucker Repub hillbillies don't send him more money
[B]it's going to be a bloodbath for the country.[/B]
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2902224]
[B] Can't Secure bond[/b]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-has-failed-get-appeal-bond-454-mln-civil-fraud-judgment-lawyers-say-2024-03-18/[/URL]
No one wants touch his assets, according to his court filing today.
Guess he's not liquid after all.[/QUOTE]Maybe the reason Trump LOVES Open Borders so so so much is because somebody told him every new border crosser is prepared to donate a peso to his non-existant, fraudulent Trump Defense Fund. Meaning, directly into his pocket.
Obviously, somebody has convinced him that 100% Trump Tariff Tax on the American Consumer from Chinese imports he wants to impose on America again will also somehow land in his pocket too. LOL.
What a pathetic, blatantly obvious low rent con man that Trump dude is! LOL. Only the dumbest suckers on Earth could possibly keep falling for his bullshit.
-
If only were it true!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2902228]
What a pathetic, blatantly obvious low rent con man that Trump dude is! LOL. Only the dumbest suckers on Earth could possibly keep falling for his bullshit.[/QUOTE]Yes and yes, and yet 70 millions of them live in this country.
Like you said it seems beyond the realm of possible that this primitive conman with his 2-bit schemes would be able to fool tens of millions of people. I mean compared to professional conmen this fruit of loom seems like a clumsy pathetic wannabe.
And yet, here we are!
70 millions can't all be "the dumbest", I'm afraid. There are other forces in play. Apparently, this daily thoughtless reciting of the Pledge of Allegiance in American schools doesn't do shit. Perhaps a full-pledged, multi-year school program on why democracy is non-negotiable and why this country is so fortunate compared to so many others would do.
And, I dare say, may be some Constitutional amendments that would bolt the gate to any authoritarian or totalitarian trying to wheel themselves in the White House is in order.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2902160]
I especially like this 1-minute video [i](presented by an Australian, no less, just for Tlito, FWIW)[/i], with Chip Roy, [b]slamming Trump[/b], for not getting the job done when he had the chance. Although, I think he doesn't know diddly, about his US conspiracies.
[b]Mar 12th, 2024:[/b] GOP failed to secure the US border: [b]Chip Roy[/b]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RftlSWHBMg[/URL]
And just so we're CLEAR, for good measure...more of good ol' Chip Roy, slamming Trump and reminding Repubs and Elvis 2008, that it was [i]"TRUMP, WHO FAILED TO SECURE THE BORDER"[/i]
[b]Dec 20th, 2023:[/b] [u]Chip Roy[/u] Fires Back at Trump: Failed to Secure Border
[URL]https://www.mediaite.com/politics/chip-roy-rips-trump-over-his-failure-to-secure-border-says-he-would-get-his-clock-cleaned-in-debate/[/URL]
[LIST][i]"President [b]Trump also failed to actually fully secure the border.[/b] If we'd gotten the policies in place, if he had worked with conservatives to get bills passed in [b]2018-19[/b], we wouldn't be in the mess were in right now." -- Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX)[/i][/LIST][u]So Elvis 2008, with w/r to Border Security:[/u]
-- EihTooms, told you it was [b]TRUMP![/b]
-- I, told you it was [b]TRUMP! [/b]
-- Repub Chip Roy, is telling you, it was [b]TRUMP![/b] When Repubs had all 3-branches of gov't.
-- All evidence put forth is telling you, it has been and was ALWAYS [b]TRUMP,[/b] as far back as 2018!
-- Border security and immigration, is clearly, [b]TRUMP's[/b] very own little PET PROJECT!
Dude, just take the [b]HINT[/b] already...[b]it was TRUMP![/b][/QUOTE]And here you go lying again. It is all Chip Roy. Chip Roy is admitting the border mess is all Trump's fault.
Here is Chip Roy going off on the Biden administration on video: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFyJPTm4Yh4[/URL].
And another post: [URL]https://roy.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-chip-roy-president-failing-fulfill-his-duty-defend-our-country[/URL].
Chip Roy was a Desantis supporter. Oops!
And then there was the lie you just told that Hunter Biden's laptop was Trump's fault. That had nothing to do with Trump. The issue with that was before the election was the intelligence agencies said the information on the laptop was Russian disinformation which was a lie.
And Joe Biden lied and said the laptop may not have belonged to Hunter.
And Hunter Biden lied and said the same thing.
And after that did not work, Hunter sued the shop which gave the FBI the laptop.
Instead of holding the tax payers funded intelligence agencies liable for lying, you go off on a rant about Fox News and disinformation.
And let's not forget what is in the laptop. It shows Hunter Biden fucking underage women, snorting cocaine, and showing payoffs not just to Hunter from China and Ukraine but to the "big guy", Joe Biden himself. And people should just ignore all that. What is on that laptop is a Trump plot.
And because you cannot defend that nor the insanity at the border, you have to lie about it.
So now we know what real disinformation is. Disinformation is telling the truth when Democrats are lying.
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2902224][URL]https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-has-failed-get-appeal-bond-454-mln-civil-fraud-judgment-lawyers-say-2024-03-18/[/URL]
No one wants touch his assets, according to his court filing today.
Guess he's not liquid after all.[/QUOTE]Let's say the last time you dummies cheered something on with Trump and that was banning him from Twitter: Trump, however, may again avoid disaster. CNN Business reported the day before Engoron released his decision that "Donald Trump just got the green light to return to Wall Street. ".
The Securities and Exchange Commission approved a merger between Trump Media & Technology Group and Digital World Acquisition Corp. , a blank-check company, which would allow the Trump media enterprise to be a publicly traded company.
A blank-check company is a "special purpose acquisition company" formed to raise funds via an initial public offering without identifying the precise use of the funds. It is publicly traded even though it does not have an established business plan or a designated potential merger opportunity.
Trump's stake in this merger could be worth $4 billion. That is enough capital to pay all the civil liability claims in the cases that have been decided and the cases that are pending.
Yeah, that was brilliant. You made Trump $4 billon richer.
You think the story here is that Trump is out of money. No, the story here is no financial company was willing to put up the bond because they would be liable for the verdict, and they all think the legal system in New York is that fucking crazy. Bond companies would stand to make a lot on issuance of the bond and if they thought the appeals courts would be reasonable and reduce the amount, which they usually do on crazy numbers like this, they would lend it, but they are not.
So what does that mean? It means no fucking way in hell New York is seeing that $454 million.
And the media does not want to let the cat out of the bag and show how impotent the prosecutor really is at this point. So she sends out a fellow prosecutor to make this video: [URL]https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/03/18/glenn_kirschner_ny_ag_letitia_james_could_put_a_padlock_on_trump_tower_if_he_cant_pay_464_million_judgment.html[/URL].
Yeah, she could put a padlock on Trump Tower and we could have nuclear war too, and nuclear war is probably more likely. Putting a padlock on Trump tower means people cannot get into their homes, the businesses in the building go under, and all the employees get to file unemployment. So what this video is really saying is there is nothing she can do.
You wait on the Appeals Court and then it could go to the Supreme Court and that is going to take time. At this point, this court case has gone at lightning speed, and it has done so because it has nothing to do with the citizens of New York. It has to deal with rigging an election and so it probably will continue that way. We are used to corrupt Democratic judges and prosecutors trying to rig elections at this point, and it is not working.
Why is that the case? From Newsweek, If the Democrats want to prevail over Trump in 2024, they will have to find far better strategies than convincing half the country that they are weaponizing law enforcement to remove the de facto leader of the opposition in the manner of a threatened banana republic supremo.
That is what you guys do not get. At this point, people are just not voting for Trump. They are voting against a banana republic.
-
Wow
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2902307]And here you go lying again. It is all Chip Roy. Chip Roy is admitting the border mess is all Trump's fault.
Here is Chip Roy going off on the Biden administration on video: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFyJPTm4Yh4[/URL].
And another post: [URL]https://roy.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-chip-roy-president-failing-fulfill-his-duty-defend-our-country[/URL].
Chip Roy was a Desantis supporter. Oops!
And then there was the lie you just told that Hunter Biden's laptop was Trump's fault. That had nothing to do with Trump. The issue with that was before the election was the intelligence agencies said the information on the laptop was Russian disinformation which was a lie.
And Joe Biden lied and said the laptop may not have belonged to Hunter.
And Hunter Biden lied and said the same thing.
And after that did not work, Hunter sued the shop which gave the FBI the laptop.
Instead of holding the tax payers funded intelligence agencies liable for lying, you go off on a rant about Fox News and disinformation.[/QUOTE]Even a numbskull member of the Getting Smaller and Smaller All The Time Repub Pink Tinkle House like Chip Roy can sure rattle off a blizzard of words lickitty split when he wants to, huh? LOL.
Which continues to beg the question; why can't these Repubs muster enough energy and focus to, you know, produce at least one piece of legislation every, oh, let's say 100 years or so that actually produces historic gains and benefits for the American people, something as revered as dozens of such legislation proposed, fought for and passed by Dems, instead of just one horrific Great Repub Depression / Great Repub Recession, Great Repub Crash, Great Repub "Once in 100 Years Disaster", Massive Repub Jobs Destruction policy and stewardship result after another?
I mean, damn, you can see that Chip Roy idiot is full of energy, vim, vigor and purpose.
So why the hell don't Repubs ever put all that energy into producing something in their recent history that they can actually run on instead of relying on their benefactors in Mainstream Media to lie, twist and spin it in their favor and then still have to encite violent cop-attacking and cop-killing mobs of Insurrectionists to storm the Capitol to steal the votes they can't win on the merits?
Such a sad waste of good and important seats in the House, the Senate and that chair in the Oval Office.
-
True. However
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2902267]Yes and yes, and yet 70 millions of them live in this country.
Like you said it seems beyond the realm of possible that this primitive conman with his 2-bit schemes would be able to fool tens of millions of people. I mean compared to professional conmen this fruit of loom seems like a clumsy pathetic wannabe.
And yet, here we are!
70 millions can't all be "the dumbest", I'm afraid. There are other forces in play. Apparently, this daily thoughtless reciting of the Pledge of Allegiance in American schools doesn't do shit. Perhaps a full-pledged, multi-year school program on why democracy is non-negotiable and why this country is so fortunate compared to so many others would do.
And, I dare say, may be some Constitutional amendments that would bolt the gate to any authoritarian or totalitarian trying to wheel themselves in the White House is in order.[/QUOTE]I only count a small percentage of Trump / Repub Party voters as suckers who fall for Trump's obvious bullshit. The most violent among them, perhaps. The ones who wind up doing prison time for him and wonder, Gee, what was I thinking.
The vast majority of Repub Party voters want the historically crap results they produce. For them, it is not a "bug" in the Repub Party history of results. It is a "feature. " That is the result they want for America and why they vote for Repubs. And to that end, Donald J. Trump is the perfect Repub lord and savior because he is The Worst President of All Time Who Produced The Worst Results of All Time.
Repub Party voters love him for that. It isn't as though they didn't "see" the crap results he produced and csn't "see" Bidrn's far, far better, historically positive results. They see both very clearly. It is just that they hate Biden for producing those far superior results for America and love Trump for shitting all over the country the way he did and the way he promises to do again if only given the chance.
That has always been what most reasonable, well-meaning observers totally miss about the Repub Party. LOL. I get a kick out of how many times observers like that are "shocked" and "astonished" by some fresh new America-hating move by that Party's leadership and ranks. They have refused to see what is right there to be seen and understood about the Repub Party since at least Nixon. Even I failed to see it until about a year into Reagan's first term as so-called potus. Hell, I was even hanging onto a ridiculous, unfounded in the historical data "False Equivalency", "Bothsiderism" view of it as late as 1992!
I realized and accepted the shameful error of my ways after that. The historical and recent data, verifiable results and easily observable reality made it impossible to ignore after that.
-
Still Trump as the Failure...
Projection, hypocrisy and bullshit is that all you have on border security? Naturally, when you don't have the truth, you don't real facts and you don't have the rule of law...good ol' Elvis 2008, will try to [b]dazzle you with bullshit![/b]
Repubs, much like their cowardice of leader, Trump, continue to the fill the room with bullshit, "laptop dick pics" conspiracies and a penchant for utter nonsense.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2902307]And here you go lying again. It is all Chip Roy. [b]Chip Roy is admitting[/b] the border mess is all Trump's fault.[/QUOTE]Yes, I'm glad you agree, unlike many other cowardly Repubs, Chip Roy isn't afraid to call out Trump and admit, TRUMP failed to secure the border.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2902307]Here is Chip Roy going off on the Biden administration on video: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFyJPTm4Yh4[/URL].
And another post: [URL]https://roy.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-chip-roy-president-failing-fulfill-his-duty-defend-our-country[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Definitely a video that, IMHO simply shows good ol' Chip Roy (R-TX), simply being passionate about what was happening at the border [i](Note: Video is 1 year ago. My video is less than [b]1 month old[/b]).[/i]
But, what you failed to add in you post, was that Chip Roy was thoroughly and masterfully rebutted by Sect. DOH Alejandro Mayorkas (when he could get a word in edge wise), and reminding Mr. Roy (R-Tx) that many of the questions, he's asking existed back in 2016 to 2020, when Repubs had full control of these very same border issues.
I image after Sect. DOH Alejandro Mayorka, schooled Chip Roy, he did his due diligence and investigative homework and indeed found that during (2016 to 2020), the TRUMP administration was indeed to blame for the failure of the border, as he dutifully explains in the one (1) recent videos and article, I provided, dated Mar 12th, 2024 and Dec 20th, 2023, here: [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=2902160&viewfull=1#post2902160 [/URL]
The most recent video and article I provide, definitely shows Chip Roy's updated border security world view, and without a doubt, [u]squarely places the blame on TRUMP! [/u]
Chip Roy may be "boisterous" and "passionate", but he's not lying. He's telling the truth. When Repubs had [b][u]ALL-3 Branches[/u] of Gov't and failed[/b] and couldn't pass anything on border security.
Put simply, Repubs, [b]"wet the bed"[/b] and did nothing, when they had ALL-3 Branches of Gov't, which is per for course, with Repubs.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2902307]Chip Roy was a Desantis supporter. Oops!
And then there was the lie you just told that Hunter Biden's laptop was Trump's fault. ...
And Joe Biden lied and said the laptop may not have belonged to Hunter. ... [/QUOTE]
As for your "laptop dick pics" conspiracy theories, have at it! Continue to make yourself a "useful idiot", in the laughing eyes of Russia!
So just keep throwing your right-wing bullshit conspiracies at the wall, hoping "something" will stick. 'Cause you know, even the sun shines up a dogs ass some days!
-
Is chaos, the new RESULTS...Repubs want?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2902466]The vast majority of Repub Party voters want the historically crap results they produce. For them, it is not a "bug" in the Repub Party history of results. It is a "feature. " That is the result they want for America and why they vote for Repubs. And to that end, Donald J. Trump is the perfect Repub lord and savior because he is The Worst President of All Time Who Produced The Worst Results of All Time.
Repub Party voters love him for that. It isn't as though they didn't "see" the crap results he produced and csn't "see" Bidrn's far, far better, historically positive results. They see both very clearly. It is just that they hate Biden for producing those far superior results for America and love Trump for shitting all over the country the way he did and the way he promises to do again if only given the chance.
[/QUOTE]You'll get no argument, here!
However, in addition, I think there is a NEW prevailing notion on the RIGHT, however, that is no longer about getting better socio-economic historical positive results anymore. My fear, is that the real [B]"results"[/B], Repubs and wingers are after today, are far more ideological, sinister and insidious.
Something more along the lines of a [b]"blood bath"[/b] at worst, but at the very least, an ideological [B]disruption[/B] and [B]chaos,[/B] of democracy, the constitution and the country.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2902466]That has always been what most reasonable, well-meaning observers totally miss about the Repub Party. LOL. I get a kick out of how many times observers like that are "shocked" and "astonished" by some fresh new America-hating move by that Party's leadership and ranks. They have refused to see what is right there to be seen and understood about the Repub Party since at least Nixon. Even I failed to see it until about a year into Reagan's first term as so-called potus. Hell, I was even hanging onto a ridiculous, unfounded in the historical data "False Equivalency", "Bothsiderism" view of it as late as 1992!
I realized and accepted the shameful error of my ways after that. The historical and recent data, verifiable results and easily observable reality made it impossible to ignore after that.[/QUOTE]The overturn of Roe v Wade, was decades in the making, for those on the right. And with equally long-term focus, right-wing "initiatives" [B]like Project 2025[/B], that are steeped in chaos, are more akin to a "Handmaid's Tale" dystopian future, than your typical egalitarian democracy.
Right-wing Heritage Foundation, projects like Project 2025, seeks to disrupt and collapse many of our democratic institutions and re-imagined them into some authoritarian, fascist, gulag hellscape. Only this time it may not take decades and may arrive a lot sooner than we think, should democracy suffer in Nov 2024.
So on the right, we have Project 2025, "mob-boss" Trump, J6 insurrectionists, election deniers, the utter total collapse and gutting of the Repubs / GOP and the RNC party...what does it all mean?
Could it be smaller parts of a larger picture? Or simply to sow the seeds of chaos, all while steadfast in the "march and drum beat" towards "civil unrest" [b]or worst, "civil war"[/b], as the right (many times) have often claimed they want?
-
Thanks, Joe and the Dems in Congress
On the occasion of the 4 year anniversary of Donald Trump's SECOND Bear Market Crash in major indexes and the broad USA Stock Market in just his 4 miserable years as so-called potus, not allowing the pro Repub Mainstream Media to erase from voters' memory and the record books that first one under Trump in late 2018, not only has the S&P 500 Index closed at another record high of 5224 after seeing NO Recession and Bear Market Crash under Joe Biden contrary to the worst record on Stock Market and economic prognostications in history by Trump and his Repub Party that we would have both by now, but at the same time the actual, factual record on virtually all categories of Crime in America continues to show historic DECLINES under histotic job-creator and wage-improving Joe Biden after a horrific rise in them under Trump's Worst President of All Time policies and stewardship brought the world Trump's Pandemic:
[B]The U.S. crime rate is still dropping, FBI data shows.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/news/crime-courts/us-crime-rate-still-dropping-says-fbi-rcna144100[/URL]
[QUOTE]New FBI data confirms previous indications that crime in the U.S. declined significantly in 2023, continuing a post-pandemic trend and belying widespread perceptions that crime is rising.
The new fourth-quarter numbers showed a 13% decline in murder in 2023 from 2022, a 6% decline in reported violent crime and a 4% decline in reported property crime. Thats based on data from around 13,000 law enforcement agencies, policing about 82% of the U.S. population, that provided the FBI with data through December.
"It suggests that when we get the final data in October, we will have seen likely the largest one-year decline in murder that has ever been recorded, said Jeff Asher, a former CIA analyst who now studies crime trends.
"After a terrible period of underfunding and understaffing caused by the pandemic, local governments have, by most measures, returned to pre-pandemic levels, wrote John Roman, a criminologist at the University of Chicago. In an interview, Roman said, The courts were closed, a lot of cops got sick, a lot of police agencies told their officers not to interact with the public. Teachers were not in schools, not working with kids."
[/QUOTE]Yes, Joe, thank you so much for what you and the Dems have done to recover America from the historic disaster of Trump's Classic Repub Economic and National Security Policies and Stewardship RESULTS virtually across the board in every meaningful way with scant to non existant assistance and contribution from Repubs who instead have been very busy bringing the country to the brink of more and more and more Repub CLOSURES to threaten the USA Economy and drooling over Hunter Biden's dick pics.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2902753]Naturally, when you don't have the truth, you don't real facts and you don't have the rule of law...good ol' Elvis 2008, will try to [b]dazzle you with bullshit![/b]
Repubs, much like their cowardice of leader, Trump, continue to the fill the room with bullshit, "laptop dick pics" conspiracies
As for your "laptop dick pics" conspiracy theories, have at it! Continue to make yourself a "useful idiot", in the laughing eyes of Russia!
So just keep throwing your right-wing bullshit conspiracies at the wall, hoping "something" will stick. 'Cause you know, even the sun shines up a dogs ass some days![/QUOTE]What does Russia have to do with the dick pics on Hunter Biden's laptop? You are the useful idiot for perpetuating that bullshit. I think the public has gotten use to the Saul Alinsky tactic of attacking your enemy where you are weak. The dummy who bought the conspiracy theory was you.
-
Is Trump still a "useful idiot" for right-wing billionairies?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2902951]What does Russia have to do with the dick pics on Hunter Biden's laptop? You are the useful idiot for perpetuating that bullshit. I think the public has gotten use to the Saul Alinsky tactic of attacking your enemy where you are weak. The dummy who bought the conspiracy theory was you.[/QUOTE]
Newsweek (2021-Mar-19): [i]"Lively speculation surrounding a laptop allegedly belonging to President Joe Biden's son Hunter has resurfaced after a declassified report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence elicited fresh debates as to whether or not Russian interference came into play."[/i]
[i]Ex U.S. spies warned the Hunter Biden scandal had Russian fingerprints...[/i]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/former-us-spies-warned-2020-hunter-biden-scandal-russian-fingerprints-rcna140240[/URL]
[b]But the connection[/b] I can't figure out, Elvis 2008, is why hasn't any right-wing, sycophant billionaires, yet stepped up, to help pay the legal bills of your [i]"Loud and Save-ior Dumbass"?[/i]
[i]Trump campaign cash crunch: Small-dollar fatigue, major donor hesitation[/i]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/18/trump-campaign-cash-crunch-small-dollar-donor-fatigue-major-donor-nerves.html[/URL]
[LIST]Like really WTF, right-wing billionaires?
- Not Robert Mercer
- Not Elon Musk [i]("I'm not paying his legal bills in anyway shape or form" --The Don Lemon Show)[/i]
- Not Kevin O'Leary [i](completely avoided the queston when asked by Larry Kudlow on FOX Business)[/i]
- Not Jarred Cushner [i](Too busy buying up R/E in Eastern Europe?)[/i]
- Not Paul Singer
- Not Charles Koch
- Not Richard and Besty DeVos
- Not Foster Friess
- Not Sheldon Adelson [/LIST]Imagine that! I mean, the nerve of Trump (and others like Lindsey Graham [R-SC]), begging hard working, RNC conservative, right-wing, beloved "uneducated", Repub MAGA cult small member donors
to [i]"foot the bill"[/i] for his legal woes, all while these [i]"fat cat" billionaires,[/i] sit on the sidelines as richer Cheshire cat, grinning ingrates.
Is that gratitude or what, especially after those huge tax cuts to the rich, wealthy and big corporations, naturally leaving trillions added to the debt for working and middle class Americans to [i]"foot that debt bill"?[/i] So I guess it's not surprising at all, but rather "on point" for right-wing administrations, policies and billionaires?
So could it be, Donald J. Trump, is no longer [b]a "useful idiot"[/b] for the right-wing billionaire donor class? If so, what's up with that Elvis 2008?
Anywho, Elvis 2008, in the same vein of paying for Trump's legal bills, don't forget to make yourself a [b]"useful idiot"[/b] and [u][i]chip-in a few bucks[/i][/u] or simply [i]"donate" as much as you can[/i]. Or just buy a few dozen pairs of Trump's gold sneakers...wait, I think another BM mentioned, they maybe out of stock?
Better yet just re-tick that [b]"donate weekly"[/b] box on the "Save America" email Trump sent you, so he can automatically siphon off your account like he did with the pension savings accounts from his senior gullible donors. (...kkkk!)
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2903001]Newsweek (2021-Mar-19): [i]"Lively speculation surrounding a laptop allegedly belonging to President Joe Biden's son Hunter has resurfaced after a declassified report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence elicited fresh debates as to whether or not Russian interference came into play."[/i]..[/QUOTE]And here we go again. This is dumb as Tooms calling me a victim. Well, at least you are not making things up. This just shows how soaked your brain is in MSMBC / Wapo / NYT / CNN bullshit.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/[/URL]
So much for "the laptop 'could be' mine."
First son Hunter Biden's lawyers admitted late Wednesday that the infamous laptop that the now-52-year-old abandoned at a Delaware computer repair shop in the throes of his crack cocaine addiction does indeed belong to him.
So the laptop being Russian disinformation was the conspiracy, and you fell for it just like you fell for Russiagate.
So the dick picks, the email about Joe Biden being the big guy, Hunter fucking underage women, and his smoking crack were all real.
In fact, polls show if the public knew the truth about the laptop, Trump wins in 2020. This whole Russian disinformation thing was orchestrated by Anthony Blinken, Biden's Secretary of State. He orchestrated this lie so Biden would win.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/05/01/antony-blinken-spies-who-lie-letter-wasnt-my-idea-didnt-ask-for-it-still-refuses-to-call-hunter-laptop-real/[/URL]
Then-candidate Joe Biden used the intelligence alumni letter to falsely claim at his second and final 2020 presidential debate with Donald Trump that The Post's reporting on his role in his family's international business dealings was a "Russian plant" and "garbage. "
"There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what he's accusing me of is a Russian plant," Biden said. "Five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he's saying is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except his good friend Rudy Giuliani. "
So here you go dummy, proof the 2020 election was rigged.
And what will be your response to this? Admitting you are wrong? Saying, gosh, if Putin is really as bad as they say, why do Democrats have to lie about him so much? Outrage over the election being fixed by intelligence agencies?
Nah, it will be the same as always. Never mind. And then back to the personal insults.
-
Yes, what about his daughter and GF Ivanka and her boy toy Jared?
[QUOTE=Spidy;2903001]Newsweek (2021-Mar-19): [i]"Lively speculation surrounding a laptop allegedly belonging to President Joe Biden's son Hunter has resurfaced after a declassified report from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence elicited fresh debates as to whether or not Russian interference came into play."[/i]
[i]Ex U.S. spies warned the Hunter Biden scandal had Russian fingerprints...[/i]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/former-us-spies-warned-2020-hunter-biden-scandal-russian-fingerprints-rcna140240[/URL]
[b]But the connection[/b] I can't figure out, Elvis 2008, is why hasn't any right-wing, sycophant billionaires, yet stepped up, to help pay the legal bills of your [i]"Loud and Save-ior Dumbass"?[/i]
[i]Trump campaign cash crunch: Small-dollar fatigue, major donor hesitation[/i]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/18/trump-campaign-cash-crunch-small-dollar-donor-fatigue-major-donor-nerves.html[/URL]..[/QUOTE]Yeah, not even Trump's daughter / GF and his idiot big time real estate loser son-in-law Jared are willing to pay the gift tax to bail out that blithering old crook.
Hell, they were handed $3 Billion by the Saudis as soon as they fled from the Trump presidential Titanic.
I don't know how shitty a so-called "businessman" would have to be to lose so much equity on what he claimed was "$10 Billion" net worth and assets ten years ago that he can't even get his hands on less than half a billion dollar mortgage loan today. LOL.
Damn. My little no brainer Southern California rental property gained some 68% over the past 10 years and that was despite Trump's Pandemic flattening the curve on appreciation for at least 2 of those years. That created tons and tons of equity I could get a mortgage loan on before I opened the door of a bank to apply for one.
And that happened while I was spending mist of my time enjoying fucking and getting blown by cute Asian girls ALLLL the way on the other side of the globe, not even wheeling and dealing fraudulent scams in the White House solely to enrich myself! LOL. What a total fuck up that Trump dude is.
-
A Pair of Bidens beats Repub Full House of "useful idiots"?
It's official, the House MAGA Repubs (and resident ISG Repub conspiracists), are nothing more than Russia's [b]"useful idiots"![/b]
Mr. Lev Parnas, a Ukrainian American businessman, ex-insider and ex-confidence man for Trump and Giuliani, testified at the House Oversight Committee's Biden Impeachment hearings, Mar 20th, 2024, to tell the truth, about the origins of the disinformation and so called [i]"evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors"[/i] against the Bidens.
Lev, was sent to the Ukraine, by Trump and Giuliani, to [i][b]"dig up dirt"[/b][/i] on the pretense that the Bidens were involved in "shady/corrupt" dealings with Birisma. But naturally, Mr. Parnas, came back empty handed and could find nothing, that could be substantiated as facts. But Giuliani, persisted with the pretense and used the information anyways.
He testified to the fact that Russia and Russian agents, were indeed the "root evil" cause, behind the disinformation and false evidence of impeachment, being pushed by the Repubs. And that the Repubs, [b][u]knowingly[/u] pushed the disinformation to FOXY Muse[/b], without it being verified or validated by any credible sources.
[LIST] Mr. Parnas, testifies that Trump and Giuliani, knowingly lied to Americans:
> [b]Mr. Lev Parnas:[/b][i] "...I say this to you, because I love my country. From shortly after my arrest on Oct 9th, 2019 up until now, I've been trying to share irrefutable truth to you. The
[b]American people, have been lied to by Donald Trump, Rudi Giuliani[/b] and various cohorts and individuals in gov't and media positions."[/i]
> [b]Mr. Lev Parnas:[/b][i] "The only information pushed on the Biden's and Ukraine, has come from one source and one source ONLY. [b]Russia and Russian Agents![/b] The impeachment proceeding that brings us here now, [u]is predicated on false information, spread by the Kremlin."[/u][/i]
> [b]Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD):[/b][i] "At what point did the [Trump/Repub] campaign to [b]'dig up dirt'[/b] on Biden, become a campaign to spread disinformation and lies about Biden?"[/i]
> [b]Mr. Lev Parnas:[/b][i] "At some point, when we hit a few brick walls, all of a sudden, then I saw the shift, between the BLT (??) group, which included John Solomon (the media personality) and Rudi Giuliani and other Trump lawyers, to start trying to push narratives, that were never validated, [and] we had no way to validate them."
"Basically, a letter would come over from someone in the Ukraine, I'd hand it over to John Solomon. Next thing you know, he'd be on FOX TV, 2-hrs later with Sean Hannity."[/i]
NBC NEWS: [URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/lev-parnas-ex-giuliani-associate-testifies-allegations-bidens-are-fals-rcna144250[/URL][/LIST]Once again, it appears our resident ISG Repub [i]"Hunter Biden laptop dick pic"[/i] conspiracist and the House Repubs, prove themselves to be nothing more that gullible, but "useful idiots" for pushing mother Russia's disinformation and divisive propaganda.
Oh and yes...the answer to all the Elvis 2008, silly [i]"Hunter Biden laptop dick pic",[/i] questions...[b]is still TRUMP![/b]
Thanks Mr. Lev Parnas, for [b]AGAIN proving...TRUMP[/b], is at the very center and the answer, to yet another Elvis 2008, questions/conspiracies!
-
Uh
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2903012]And here we go again. This is dumb as Tooms calling me a victim. Well, at least you are not making things up. This just shows how soaked your brain is in MSMBC / Wapo / NYT / CNN bullshit.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/02/01/hunter-biden-admits-infamous-laptop-is-his-in-plea-for-probe/[/URL]
So much for "the laptop 'could be' mine."
First son Hunter Biden's lawyers admitted late Wednesday that the infamous laptop that the now-52-year-old abandoned at a Delaware computer repair shop in the throes of his crack cocaine addiction does indeed belong to him.
So the laptop being Russian disinformation was the conspiracy, and you fell for it just like you fell for Russiagate.
So the dick picks, the email about Joe Biden being the big guy, Hunter fucking underage women, and his smoking crack were all real.
In fact, polls show if the public knew the truth about the laptop, Trump wins in 2020. This whole Russian disinformation thing was orchestrated by Anthony Blinken, Biden's Secretary of State. He orchestrated this lie so Biden would win.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2023/05/01/antony-blinken-spies-who-lie-letter-wasnt-my-idea-didnt-ask-for-it-still-refuses-to-call-hunter-laptop-real/[/URL]
Then-candidate Joe Biden used the intelligence alumni letter to falsely claim at his second and final 2020 presidential debate with Donald Trump that The Post's reporting on his role in his family's international business dealings was a "Russian plant" and "garbage. "
"There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what he's accusing me of is a Russian plant," Biden said. "Five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he's saying is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except his good friend Rudy Giuliani. "
So here you go dummy, proof the 2020 election was rigged.
And what will be your response to this? Admitting you are wrong? Saying, gosh, if Putin is really as bad as they say, why do Democrats have to lie about him so much? Outrage over the election being fixed by intelligence agencies?
Nah, it will be the same as always. Never mind. And then back to the personal insults.[/QUOTE]There is no evidence in that laptop, under, over, around or behind Hunter's coveted (by Repubs) dick pics or in fact on any other laptop, desk top, official notes, post-its, memos or smoke signals connecting Joe Biden with any wrongdoing, much less a high crime or misdemeanor.
You'll just have to find something else to feel victimized by. Select from any number of imaginary outrages Donald J. Trump whines and cries about on an hourly basis if you can't conjure up any on your own.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2903093] [b]Mr. Lev Parnas:[/b] "At some point, when we hit a few brick walls, all of a sudden, then I saw the shift, between the BLT (??) group, which included John Solomon (the media personality) and Rudi Giuliani and other Trump lawyers, to start trying to push narratives, that were never validated, and we had no way to validate them."[/QUOTE]Not that it matters to your expose, but the "BLT group" is a bunch of low-life Trump co-conspirators who got together at the BLT restaurant in his DC hotel.
[URL]https://themoscowproject.org/dispatch/the-blt-team-at-the-center-of-trumps-extortion-scheme-is-linked-to-nunes-why-hasnt-he-recused-himself-from-the-investigation/index.html[/URL]
-
Tucker Carlson has excellent judgement
Was Carlson still there for this?
[B]Tucker Carlson: Moscow so much nicer than any city in my country
2/13/24[/B] [URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4465352-tucker-carlson-moscow-putin/[/URL].
[B]Moscow concert attack live updates: More than 60 reported dead; ISIS claims responsibility.
3/23/24[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/live-blog/russia-moscow-concert-attack-shooting-rcna144706[/URL]
I hear Carlson followed up those glowing travel reviews of Putin's facade with praises for Netanyahu's "highly effective security wall", the "perfect timing" of all those numbskulls who moved from Blue states to Red states right before Red states began outlawing Sex For Pleasure and a special 4 year anniversary celebration of when Trump had totally ignored all expert dire warnings to prepare for a potential Pandemic along with the guidelines and tools to do it for at least a year as a means for him to finally create Trump's Pandemic:
[B]Trump says 'nobody' could've predicted a pandemic like coronavirus. Here are all the times he was warned about it and refused to take action.
March 31, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-all-the-times-trump-was-warned-about-pandemic-2020-3[/URL]
[QUOTE]President Donald Trump has frequently insisted that "nobody" could have seen the coronavirus outbreak coming and that it "came out of nowhere."
The pandemic's scope and severity are unlike anything the global community has grappled with in decades.
But the president was warned urgently and repeatedly of this scenario, and his claim that it "came out of nowhere" and could not have been predicted is patently false.
US officials conducted training exercises last year simulating the exact scenario that's currently playing out, but their warnings went unheeded. Intelligence officials were also warning Trump about a pandemic as early as January, but they "couldn't get him to do anything about it."
The Trump administration declined to use an Obama-era playbook instructing federal officials on how to prepare for a pandemic.
And the president has spent the last two years slashing the government agencies responsible for handling such an outbreak.[/QUOTE]
-
Muller Report
Anybody here remember the Muller Report? Anybody here that actually read it, or only the fake synopsis by Trump Attorney General and Trump.
Protector at that time, William Barr, who has since denounced him? And much of the report was redacted. Yeah, Muller made weak responses to congress, but the report published was comprehensive and did NOT exonerate Trump, as Muller has said.
-
[QUOTE=Beijing4987;2903273]
[B]Muller Report [/b]
Anybody here remember the Muller Report? Anybody here that actually read it, or only the fake synopsis by Trump Attorney General and Trump.
Protector at that time, William Barr, who has since denounced him? And much of the report was redacted. Yeah, Muller made weak responses to congress, but the report published was comprehensive and did NOT exonerate Trump, as Muller has said.[/QUOTE]Of course, the world will never forget it.
It was another not so puzzling instance where whatever DOJ or Congress is in session at the time it is decided a Repub should be appointed Special Council to investigate another Repub.
But, oh don't worry about any possible favoritism, downplaying or bias in that. Just to show you how fairly "Bothsider" the entire system is, they will ALSO assign a Repub to investigate any Dem suspected of wrongdoing.
Lolololol. Rigged in favor of Repubs much?
Well, anyway, try as he might not too, Repub Mueller still found and cited at least 10 criminally indictable acts committed by Trump with the qualifier that he wasn't going to indict Trump for those obvious crimes because, you know, another Repub administration DOJ once upon a time scratched out a memo in crayon that a sitting potus should not be indicted for a crime.
So he strongly suggested Congress set about its duty to Impeach him for those crimes and then let The Law proceed with indictments of him after he gets his ass put out of the White House.
That was way way way back in olden times when Team Trump and the Repub Majority Leader in the Senate understood and bluntly stated that a former potus could and should absolutely be indicted for crimes he committed as potus. Ancient history in the minds of the MAGA now, if you can call whatever they have in their skulls minds.
LOL. I remember the immediate victory lap Trump took when his Repub AG Barr lied his ass off about what the Mueller Report actually reported, basking in the glow of "he found no Collusion"! Uh. Mueller clearly stated he wasn't even looking for "collusion" exactly since there is no law against it anyway. But, of course, it was Team Trump's deep and intense collusion with Russia that made it impossible for the FBI to ignore it and avoid investigating it without being accused of utter dereliction of their duty to protect the American people from a probable Russian Asset and virulent America-hating Insurrectionist sitting right there in The Oval Office a tiny percentage of the time and at his failed golf resorts the rest of the time.
And, clearly, they were 100% on the right track about that.
-
Russia's Agents of Chaos...
Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-WI), promptly calls it quits and resigns from the "Repub House Clown Show", and follows "the parted Red Sea", left by Rep. Joe Buck (R-CO) and will be walking out the doors, come April, 19th, 2024.
So if Gallagher, leaves on April 19th, it means, there is no special election and the Repubs can't get his seat back. Does seem like Mike Gallagher, is giving Trump and the MAGA House Repubs, the "middle figure" on his way out the door?
[b]GOP Rep. Mike Gallagher To Resign Early From House - HuffPost[/b]
[URL]https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mike-gallagher-wisconsin-republican-gop_n_65fdc840e4b01d7420add61a?ncid=engmodushpmg00000003[/URL]
George Desantos, Joe Buck and now Mike Gallagher...next up?
Right about now, one the greatest songs by Rock and Roll Legends, [b]Queen[/b], does come to mind, at a time like this? [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqyUAtzS_6M[/URL]
Anywho, what with MTG, looking to oust yet another speaker from the House, in christo-fascist Mike Johnson, the Repubs fall, into further disarray and dysfunction. And if the trend continues, it shouldn't be long before the Dems retake the House, much less Repubs garner a "cohesive" majority to pass more silly votes for "impeachment", [b]just to please their idolater.[/b]
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2903204]Not that it matters to your expose, but the "BLT group" is a bunch of low-life Trump co-conspirators who got together at the BLT restaurant in his DC hotel.
[URL]https://themoscowproject.org/dispatch/the-blt-team-at-the-center-of-trumps-extortion-scheme-is-linked-to-nunes-why-hasnt-he-recused-himself-from-the-investigation/index.html[/URL][/QUOTE]
Thanks, much appreciated!
That article was very informative and definitely help filled in a few blanks w/r to Mr. Parnas testimony.
I do like your apt "BLT" description though, [i]"...is a [b]b[/b]unch of [b]l[/b]ow-life [b]T[/b]rump[sters] co-conspirators..." [/i]. Very apropos, even if was unintentional!
-
2 photos
RealClearPolitics is demonstrably Winger-Leaning. Here is an example of it.
When I have repeatedly characterized the RealClearPolitics polling service site as "demonstrably Winger-Leaning", this is what I am referring to:
As of this writing, the RCP Poll of Polls Consensus for Trump vs Biden has Trump ahead by 1. 7 points. Yes, that is less than half of a normal +/-MoE for most polls, which means it is considered a statistical tie. But this is where it sat all weekend, giving the pundits on the Sunday political shows fodder to praise Trump's lead and slam Biden for being behind.
So where were these three latest polls from Morning Consult and You. Gov showing Biden ahead of Trump on all three of them and all three of them posted on the 538 Polling site by Sunday but none of them showing up on RCP in time to be factored into their Poll of Polls Consensus yet?
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/[/URL]
See:
Polls ending March 23,2024.
Morning Consult.
March 19-21.
Morning Consult.
March 16-19.
You. Gov.
None of those three polls made it to that RCP Poll of Polls Consensus for Trump vs Biden in time for the Sunday political programs, yet Morning Consult and You. Gov routinely appear on that RCP site. If I didn't know better, why I might conclude RCP is holding back those three polls showing Biden ahead of Trump until they can get their hands on another Rasmussen, Emerson or Harris Poll that can run in to save the day for them keeping Trump ahead of Biden for those Sunday political shows to feast on. LOL.
Meanwhile, even without those three frequently cited polls now showing Biden ahead of Trump, that slim 1. 7 point advantage for Trump over Biden would not exist without them including that Selzer Poll showing Trump up 7 points over Biden. Whatever the hell a Selzer Poll is. I had to scroll back more than 5 months to see another Selzer Poll in an RCP Trump vs Biden Consensus. So apparently they trot one of those oddball polls out of nowhere whenever their beloved fellow Winger-Leaning Rasmussen, Emerson or Harris polls are not available to save the day for them.
[URL]https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/trump-vs-biden[/URL]
-
An inarguable truth that, lucky you, everyone here already knows.
LOL. This is the unavoidable and inarguable "But The Emperor is Naked" truth in direct opposition to the general poll assertions that seems to finally come up during every Great Repub Depression, Great Repub Recession, Massive Repub Jobs destruction and, as now, every Great Dem Economic Recovery, Great Dem Economic Expansion and Great Dem Jobs Creation.
But but but the Repubs' bullshit pitch that their methods of cutting or ignoring regulations and cutting taxes so everything is FREE and America will be a Deadbeat's Paradice sounds so sweet, doesn't it? LOL. Sure, poll respondents are more likely as not to fall for that bullshit even in the face of every Repub effort towards that end results in the worst economic conditions in history and NONE of the boom times.
[B]Democrats Are Better for the US Economy.
Even those who believe that Democrats, by and large, pursue better economic policies than Republicans have a hard time explaining why the US economy performs so significantly and consistently better under Democratic presidents. But the figures speak for themselves.
March 25, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/us-economic-performance-consistently-better-under-democratic-presidents-by-jeffrey-frankel-2024-03[/URL]
BTW, this dude doesn't even mention the historically dramatically superior USA Stock Market gains under Dems like Joe Biden vs Repubs.
Just ask Trump how that feels right about now.
-
Just another winger propaganda machine...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2903936]When I have repeatedly characterized the RealClearPolitics polling service site as "demonstrably Winger-Leaning", this is what I am referring to:
As of this writing, the RCP Poll of Polls Consensus for Trump vs Biden has Trump ahead by 1. 7 points. Yes, that is less than half of a normal +/-MoE for most polls, which means it is considered a statistical tie. But this is where it sat all weekend, giving the pundits on the Sunday political shows fodder to praise Trump's lead and slam Biden for being behind.[/QUOTE]
That's some pretty damn good investigative work.
Your assessment of the RealClearPolitics, now being more of a right-wing leaning site, does track, with a 2020 study and an NYT Article, [i]"A Popular Political Site Made a Sharp Right Turn. What Steered It?"[/i]
[QUOTE=Wiki] According to a 2020 Knight Foundation study, RealClearPolitics is generally read by a moderate audience, leaning slightly toward the right.
Since 2020, the content of the site has [u]moved further towards right-leaning politics[/u], coinciding with its increasing [b]funding by [u]right-wing donors[/u] supporting Republican cause.[/b]
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RealClearPolitics[/URL][/QUOTE]
It's definitely, a very good peek into the world of polls and how they operate. You highlight some of the crafty, manipulative and artful machinations employed to that skew results. Which is probably why, I don't give polling a lot of credence and treat them with a rather large "pinch of salt".
But, by all accounts, RealClearPolitics, looks to be, just another propaganda outlet, of the Repub Party.
-
Touche' and coming from the rabidly Never Trump NR no less
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/03/no-one-is-above-the-law-that-means-a-trump-doj-must-indict-joe-biden/[/URL]
Sounds like they are considering the return of Our Lord and Savior a foregone conclusion! (like everyone else with a brain lololol).
Allahu Akbar!!
-
Another Repub "big lie" put to rest!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2904173]LOL. This is the unavoidable and inarguable "But The Emperor is Naked" truth in direct opposition to the general poll assertions that seems to finally come up during every Great Repub Depression, Great Repub Recession, Massive Repub Jobs destruction and, as now, every Great Dem Economic Recovery, Great Dem Economic Expansion and Great Dem Jobs Creation.
But but but the Repubs' bullshit pitch that their methods of cutting or ignoring regulations and cutting taxes so everything is FREE and America will be a Deadbeat's Paradice sounds so sweet, doesn't it? LOL. Sure, poll respondents are more likely as not to fall for that bullshit even in the face of every Repub effort towards that end results in the worst economic conditions in history and NONE of the boom times.
[B]Democrats Are Better for the US Economy.
Even those who believe that Democrats, by and large, pursue better economic policies than Republicans have a hard time explaining why the US economy performs so significantly and consistently better under Democratic presidents. But the figures speak for themselves.
March 25, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/us-economic-performance-consistently-better-under-democratic-presidents-by-jeffrey-frankel-2024-03[/URL]
BTW, this dude doesn't even mention the historically dramatically superior USA Stock Market gains under Dems like Joe Biden vs Repubs.
Just ask Trump how that feels right about now.[/QUOTE]Excellent Article!
The article thoroughly, puts to bed, yet another "big lie" Repubs love to throw out there, when it comes to the economy.
Definitely a keeper and a great article, to trotting out, for those special moments when you need to [i]"shut up"[/i] Repubs, when they're blathering on about their [B]so called "economic success/record."[/B]
Nice find, that perfectly mirrors, what you've been telling, so called Rebup ISG economist infidels, about the part 100 years of US economic history.
Well done!
-
A week of the entitled arrogant cry baby billionaire class...
What a week of cry baby billionaires, from Trump, Kevin O'Leary to Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), disgustingly claim "victimhood" as they decry, there were [b]"no victims"[/b] in their fraudulent crimes. Bemoaning how the public has no idea, how hard it is, to defraud people and make it look like a "victimless" crime. Not to mention, how [b]"unfair"[/b] they've all been being treated...boo-hoo!
Poodle billionaire and Trump lapdog, Kevin O'Leary, was blustering and blathering on about Trumps flagrantly and gross R/E "over-evaluation" tax dodge, seen as characterizing this criminal behavior as a victimless crime and [b]proudly[/b] states, [i]"...everything you've just listed off, is done by every R/E developer, everywhere on earth, in every city, this is never ever been prosecuted..."[/i]
O'Leary's billionaire arrogance, prompted Jon Stewart, to do a pretty funny comedic bit, saying:
[QUOTE=Jon Stewart] "...I'm surprised to hear he's so chill about overvaluing something that he thinks is victimless, because when someone tries to do that to him..."[/QUOTE]
Queue the Montage of O'Leary being outraged by contestants overvaluing their businesses on Shark Tank, here: [URL]https://youtu.be/EDMinX6t1Zk?t=480 [/URL]
Then rips O'Leary a new one:
[QUOTE=Jon Stewart] "There is a theory in law that, if enough people commit a crime, it automatically becomes legal. You're familiar with [b]The Purge[/b], are you not?" [/QUOTE]
Stewart finishes with:
[QUOTE=Jon Stewart] "I'll guarantee you there aren't just financial consequences for those lies, but criminal ones. But, don't tell that to the investment community, because in their minds, in pursuit of profit, there is no rule that cannot be bent, there is no principle that cannot be undercut, [b]as long as you and your f---ing friends are making money.[/b]" [/QUOTE]
O'Leary Comedic Bit: [URL]https://youtu.be/EDMinX6t1Zk?t=480 [/URL]
TDS entire Trump Fraud Comedic Bit: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDMinX6t1Zk [/URL]
News Article and Video: [URL]https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/jon-stewart-slams-shark-tank-142735020.html [/URL]
Then, FTX founder SBF, sentenced to 25 years in prison, shows no remorse, and clings to "victimless" claims of his fraudulent crimes. Judge Lewis Kaplan, slams SBF's speech as the worst "self-incriminating" testimony he's seen in his 30 years of his judgeship. Axios: [URL]https://www.axios.com/2024/03/28/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-prison-sentence[/URL]
Yeah, the fraudulent steal of billions of dollars from tax payers and crypto customers, is ALWAYS victimless AND NEVER a fraudulent crime, in the eyes of entitled billionaire class. But the theft of a less than $30 dollar item at a Walgreens and they demand, the perp to be shot on site.
-
The Largest Inauguration Audience Ever! Part Infinity.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2904711]What a week of cry baby billionaires, from Trump, Kevin O'Leary to Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), disgustingly claim "victimhood" as they decry, there were [b]"no victims"[/b] in their fraudulent crimes. Bemoaning how the public has no idea, how hard it is, to defraud people and make it look like a "victimless" crime. Not to mention, how [b]"unfair"[/b] they've all been being treated...boo-hoo!
Poodle billionaire and Trump lapdog, Kevin O'Leary, was blustering and blathering on about Trumps flagrantly and gross R/E "over-evaluation" tax dodge, seen as characterizing this criminal behavior as a victimless crime and [b]proudly[/b] states, [i]"...everything you've just listed off, is done by every R/E developer, everywhere on earth, in every city, this is never ever been prosecuted..."[/i]
O'Leary's billionaire arrogance, prompted Jon Stewart, to do a pretty funny comedic bit, saying:
Queue the Montage of O'Leary being outraged by contestants overvaluing their businesses on Shark Tank, here: [URL]https://youtu.be/EDMinX6t1Zk?t=480 [/URL]
Then rips O'Leary a new one:
Stewart finishes with:
O'Leary Comedic Bit: [URL]https://youtu.be/EDMinX6t1Zk?t=480 [/URL]
TDS entire Trump Fraud Comedic Bit: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDMinX6t1Zk [/URL]
News Article and Video: [URL]https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/jon-stewart-slams-shark-tank-142735020.html [/URL]
Then, FTX founder SBF, sentenced to 25 years in prison, shows no remorse, and clings to "victimless" claims of his fraudulent crimes. Judge Lewis Kaplan, slams SBF's speech as the worst "self-incriminating" testimony he's seen in his 30 years of his judgeship. Axios: [URL]https://www.axios.com/2024/03/28/sam-bankman-fried-ftx-prison-sentence[/URL]
Yeah, the fraudulent steal of billions of dollars from tax payers and crypto customers, is ALWAYS victimless AND NEVER a fraudulent crime, in the eyes of entitled billionaire class. But the theft of a less than $30 dollar item at a Walgreens and they demand, the perp to be shot on site.[/QUOTE]If "every Real Estate developer, everywhere on earth" triples the actual size of their properties on legal documents as Trump did then the earth is a much, much smaller planet than those Real Estate developer liars have conned us into believing.
Would those Real Estate developers accept it and just move on if we only paid them 33% of the negotiated, settled and contracted price for their properties?
Somebody tell Trump he has already wasted three terms as a so-called potus, one more than the current Constitutional limit and three times the number he actually wasted and see if he'll finally go away and haunt some other country.
-
Commander in Cheat - How Golf Explains Trump!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2904868][b]The Largest Inauguration Audience Ever! Part Infinity[/b]
If "every Real Estate developer, everywhere on earth" triples the actual size of their properties on legal documents as Trump did then the earth is a much, much smaller planet than those Real Estate developer liars have conned us into believing.
Would those Real Estate developers accept it and just move on if we only paid them 33% of the negotiated, settled and contracted price for their properties?
Somebody tell Trump he has already wasted three terms as a so-called potus, one more than the current Constitutional limit and three times the number he actually wasted and see if he'll finally go away and haunt some other country. [/QUOTE]
Yes, all epic Trump lies! Much like his tawdry quip, about ONLY being, "a dictator on day one (1)".
This comes on the heels of his Trumps recent cheat, as he brags about winning two tournaments (nudge, nudge, wink, wink), at his own club. Which did remind me, of the book by author Rick Reilly (a golfer who's covered the game for over 40 years), and how Trump got the dubious name "Commander in Cheat".
In a pretty accurate depiction of ex-President lying, cheating and fudging his golf game to win, by any and all means, Mr. Reilly, tells us, how Trump's golf game, mirrors the ex-President's real life crooked shenanigans, grifting, dishonesty, fraudulent behavior and lies at any cost, to win.
[b]In a interview with Deadline White House (Mar 26th, 2024):[/b]
[URL]https://www.msn.com/en-ca/video/sports/congrats-donald-notorious-golf-cheater-brags-he-won-two-tournaments-at-his-own-club/vi-BB1kAeeZ[/URL]
[QUOTE] "Nicole, I've always said, golf is like bicycle shorts...it reveals a lot about a guy"[/QUOTE]
Rick Reilly, referring to Trump's cheating and not being about to accept losing:
[QUOTE] "Trump doesn't just cheat at golf. He cheats like a 3-card monte dealer. He throws it, boots it, and moves it. He lies about his lies, He fudges, and foozles and fluffs."[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE] I dont know much about politics, but I know golf and it really offended me, not as a voter or as a citizen just as a golfer. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE] "...he took seven mulligans and a "Gimme Chip-in", I've never even heard of "Gimme Chip-in"[/QUOTE]
Deadline WH, [b]GREAT[/b] 1st interview w/Rick Reilly, on Trump, the Commander in Cheat (Apr 2nd, 2019):
[URL]https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/watch/donald-trump-the-cheater-in-chief-1470201923662[/URL]
[QUOTE] You might be thinking, What does golf have to do with being president? What does it matter that he cheats at it? What's it got to do with leading the country? [b]Everything[/b]
If you'll cheat to win at golf, [u]is it that much further [b]to cheat[/b] to win an election?[/u] To turn a Congressional vote? To Stop an investigation? ... [/QUOTE]
It was said the great golfer, Arnold Palmer, first had a round of golf, to know all he wanted to know about a prospective business partner, before he got into business. Maybe Repubs should use this a their new vetting tool?
If Trump, becomes "dictator for a day", I wonder if the number of "holes-in-one", he'll claim, will beat that of Kim Jong-il, the former leader of North Korea, who reportedly shot, [i]"11 holes-in-one in a single round"[/i], during his [b]first ever golf game[/b] at the Pyongyang Golf Course in 1994. (...is it any wonder why, Trump loves dictators ...kkkk!)
-
Speaking of Republican Cheats...
Brian Pritchard, in the state of Georgia, the Republican first vice-chairman, claimed that the 2020 election was plagued with voter fraud.
He knew this to be true, because typical of Repub cheaters (just like his "savior" Trump), he was projecting and committing voter fraud, himself. The very thing he was accusing the opposition Dems of doing, he was violating in spades.
But this guy went to the extremes and committed voter fraud 9x times. Brian Pritchard, knowingly committed voter fraud and voted nine (9x) times, [u]while on probation for felony check forgery sentence[/u] and [b]ONLY got a $5,000 fine[/b] and receive a [b]public reprimand.[/b]
[b]Mar 29th, 2024[/b] A Republican official claimed that the 2020 election was plagued with voter fraud. Now a judge has ruled that he voted illegally 9 times. [url]https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/republican-voter-fraud-brian-pritchard-georgia-b2520675.html[/url]
I guess when the "penalty bar" for Repubs, committing voter fraud 9x times, is this low, it's no wonder, they don't hesitate to commit such felonies and are the ones caught doing the wide majority of ACTUAL voter fraud.
-
Thanks again and again and again, Joe
Otherwise, what a Classic Repub like Trump would call a "cesspool":
[B]Today's jobs report shows economy added booming 303K jobs in March, unemployment at 3.8%.
April 5, 2023[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/04/05/march-jobs-report-numbers/73203899007/[/URL]
[QUOTE] Payroll gains for January and February were revised up by a total 22,000, portraying an even more robust picture of job growth early this year. January's were bumped up from 229,000 to 256,000 while February's were downgraded modestly, from 275,000 to 270,000.
The blockbuster report bolsters the view that the economy is on track for a "soft landing," a scenario in which the Federal Reserve wrestles down inflation without triggering a recession. But the resilient labor market could prompt the Fed to push interest rate cuts to later in the year to ensure inflation is subdued before acting, economists say.
.....
Many Americans, meanwhile, are benefitting because typical pay increases have topped inflation the past year, giving them more purchasing power.
.....
But Goldman Sachs believes a huge influx of immigrants will continue to boost the labor supply and juice hiring this year, noting the number of job openings is still well above the pre-crisis mark. Last month, immigration could have lifted job growth by as much as 50,000 to 290,000, Goldman said.
[/QUOTE]Oh and why not complete this totally verifiable and substantiated unprecedented Peace and Prosperty reality for America unlike anywhere else on the Planet post-Trump's Pandemic by citing the fact that no American troops have been actively involved in any war anywhere for the past 3 historically positive years under President Joe Biden.
Still, Repub Party leadership, rank and file members and voters are pining for the days when their beloved Repub so-called potuses searched for and embraced any and every "Once in 100 Years" economic and / or national security disaster to plunge us into another and another and another Great Repub Depression, Great Repub Recession, Massive Repub Jobs Destruction and Great Repub Stock Market Crash in order to "feel" that MAGA is really producing the Repub Party results it was born to produce over and over and over and over again whenever the American electorate is sucker, foolish and careless enough to give them the slightest opportunity and leverage to do it.
-
Flummoxed Again...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2906567]Otherwise, what a Classic Repub like Trump would call a "cesspool":
[B]Today's jobs report shows economy added booming 303K jobs in March, unemployment at 3.8%.
April 5, 2023[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2024/04/05/march-jobs-report-numbers/73203899007/[/URL][/QUOTE]
Watch Fox News Panic On-Air Over the [b]Great Jobs Report[/b]
[URL]https://www.yahoo.com/news/watch-fox-news-panic-air-202120449.html[/URL]
And it's always hilariously entertaining, to see FOXY Muse, stumble all over themselves, flummoxed for an explanation, other than the real one, of [b]"It's just a really GREAT JOB and ECONOMIC report."[/b]
-
Donnie's "delay, delay, delay" dithering judge Cannon...
Special Counsel Jack Smith, essentially tells the dithering Judge Cannon, to [b]"shit or get off the pot"[/b], in the Mar-a-Lago Documents Case.
Judge Aileen Cannon, seems hell bent on assisting Trump, with an acquittal, by using a political ploy, disguised as a judicial legal strategy. As she delays and dithers in the case proceedings, with her bizarre jury instruction direction orders, to both legal counsels, when no trail date or jury as been selected.
Needless to say, Jack Smith, has had enough and is likely to force her hand, if she doesn't rule, he may bring a [b]writ of mandamus[/b] against the judge, with the 11th Circuit Appellate courts. If successful, this would be the dithering judge's 3rd time of being "slapped down" by the 11th Circuit Appellate courts and in all likelihood, removed from the case, for her blatant partisan judgements and rulings.
To his credit, Trump is playing Jack Smith and Judge Aileen Cannon as political players and perhaps to a greater extent, on the judicial landscape, that extends all the way to the very top, with a partisan right-wing SCOTUS, that no longer follow the rule of law, but a political ideology.
[QUOTE] The Trump-appointed judge is on the verge of being appealed in the former presidents classified documents case. Shes apparently contemplating a Trumpian fringe legal theory.
...
Well, special counsel Jack Smith just filed a devastating response, telling Cannon that he might have to challenge the Trump appointee on appeal if she doesn't get it together.
[URL]https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/trump-aileen-cannon-jury-instructions-jack-smith-rcna146173[/URL][/QUOTE]
So the very case that was a "slam dunk", if at all, out of all the strongest felony cases against Trump, [b]if "next steps" are unsuccessfully navigated,[/b] by prosecutor, Jack Smith, the doc't case could be tossed out or railroaded into legal double jeopardy, by this dithering, but yet "wily" partisan judge.
The seek for removal looks eminent, but again plays in Trump's "delay, delay, delay" tactics. So what is to be done?
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2907167]Watch Fox News Panic On-Air Over the [b]Great Jobs Report[/b]
[URL]https://www.yahoo.com/news/watch-fox-news-panic-air-202120449.html[/URL]
And it's always hilariously entertaining, to see FOXY Muse, stumble all over themselves, flummoxed for an explanation, other than the real one, of [b]"It's just a really GREAT JOB and ECONOMIC report."[/b][/QUOTE][URL]https://lefsetz.com/wordpress/2024/04/07/mass-that-is-not/[/URL]
This is another disconnect, Biden and the news keep telling us the economy is roaring, the stock market is soaring, but grocery bills are out of sight. Don't tell me it's not Biden's fault, don't tell me by almost all metrics the economy truly is good, what has that got to do with me? Once again, the people parading in power are disconnected from what is happening on the street.
And this guy Lefetz is a huge Democratic douche.
Now maybe we can have some douche here who lives in a far off land argue why this Democrat is wrong. LOL.
Maybe he is adding up his bill wrong. Maybe you should try substituting animal protein with insect protein and save the planet? The economy is fine Lefetz, and we people living in Thailand know better.
OMG. He must be a bothsider. Yeah, that must be it.
But then there is this when Oliver Anthony's hit song came out that was loved by right wingers.
[URL]https://lefsetz.com/wordpress/2023/08/22/oliver-anthony-rich-men-north-of-richmond/[/URL]
Billy Bragg's answer song would be getting traction, but it's not. "Richmond" is a phenomenon driven by right wing press. Believing it is owning the libs when that is patently untrue. This is what happens when a ranking system is flawed. Sales far outweigh streams on the chart, even though streams are by far the dominant mode of consumption. So truth is not. Buying "Richmond" is akin to texting two dollars to Donald Trump.
If you want wisdom don't look to some ignorant reactionary punk south of Richmond, but someone who knows of what they speak, who is intelligent and can express themselves, who knows you've got to think for yourself. If Oliver Anthony is a leader. Count me out.
End of link.
Can you get more Democratic douche than that? Now what?
We have to go back to the never mind ploy. Never mind about grocery bills.
But Trump blah, blah, blah, MAGA, blah, blah, blah, Qanon, blah, blah, blah, indictments, blah, blah, blah, Fox News, blah, blah, blah.
And if all that fails, write an article stating, Dear Mr. Lefetz, why Trump is responsible for your higher grocery bill.
Do you douches have anything other than that?
-
LOL. Brave Stock Market Investers ran in mild panic over that Inflation report
Really funny. After months and months of positive reports and all time record high closes, one Inflation report came in a whole 0. 1 point "higher than expected" and stock market Nervous Nellie's ran for the hills. We'll, not as much as MSM tried to spin it. Actually, the broad market simply swung by a bit less than 1% in a day. Which is not uncommon in an environment of repeated All Time Record Hogh closes. And daily 1% swings up and down are not all that uncommon anytime.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2907553][URL]https://lefsetz.com/wordpress/2024/04/07/mass-that-is-not/[/URL]
This is another disconnect, Biden and the news keep telling us the economy is roaring, the stock market is soaring, but grocery bills are out of sight. Don't tell me it's not Biden's fault, don't tell me by almost all metrics the economy truly is good, what has that got to do with me? Once again, the people parading in power are disconnected from what is happening on the street.
And this guy Lefetz is a huge Democratic douche.
Now maybe we can have some douche here who lives in a far off land argue why this Democrat is wrong. LOL.
Maybe he is adding up his bill wrong. Maybe you should try substituting animal protein with insect protein and save the planet? The economy is fine Lefetz, and we people living in Thailand know better.
OMG. He must be a bothsider. Yeah, that must be it.
But then there is this when Oliver Anthony's hit song came out that was loved by right wingers.
[URL]https://lefsetz.com/wordpress/2023/08/22/oliver-anthony-rich-men-north-of-richmond/[/URL]
Billy Bragg's answer song would be getting traction, but it's not. "Richmond" is a phenomenon driven by right wing press. Believing it is owning the libs when that is patently untrue. This is what happens when a ranking system is flawed. Sales far outweigh streams on the chart, even though streams are by far the dominant mode of consumption. So truth is not. Buying "Richmond" is akin to texting two dollars to Donald Trump.
If you want wisdom don't look to some ignorant reactionary punk south of Richmond, but someone who knows of what they speak, who is intelligent and can express themselves, who knows you've got to think for yourself. If Oliver Anthony is a leader. Count me out.
End of link.
Can you get more Democratic douche than that? Now what?
We have to go back to the never mind ploy. Never mind about grocery bills.
But Trump blah, blah, blah, MAGA, blah, blah, blah, Qanon, blah, blah, blah, indictments, blah, blah, blah, Fox News, blah, blah, blah.
And if all that fails, write an article stating, Dear Mr. Lefetz, why Trump is responsible for your higher grocery bill.
Do you douches have anything other than that?[/QUOTE]It turns out the data, the consumer spending trends and American economic reality under Biden vs Trump and any other Repub does not miraculously change as it travels in cyberspace between USA and Thailand or between Washington and Ithoughtitwasafart, Wyoming.
[B]Here's the inflation breakdown for March 2024 in one chart[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/10/heres-the-inflation-breakdown-for-march-2024-in-one-chart.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]There are some bright spots, such as food prices, though. [B]Household buying power is also up over the past year as wage growth has outstripped inflation.[/b]
[/QUOTE]Thanks again, Joe. Despite the historic Trump's Pandemic Global Supply-Chain Collapse Inflation and all of Trump's other Worst President of All Time disastrous economic and national security policy and stewardship results that you were handed a scant 3 years ago as well as a typically dithering and incompetent Repub / Trump- appointed Fed Chairman to stumble and fumble the relatively easy job of reducing Trump's Inflation quickly and effectively, your histotic jobs creation legislation, policies and stewardship has still managed to increase wages so as to masterfully override the negative effects of it.
Luckily, Biden's post-State of the Union Address bump in the polls, which typically pro Repub Mainstream Media worked mightily to convince us did not happen and perhaps even made it worse for Biden ("Don't you want to side with those loveable Repub Winners"? LOL), strongly suggests more and more Americans are realizing it now that they are paying attention, finally catching up to me and my awareness of it, even though they live right there in the neighborhood of my rental property and I live in exciting, sexy Bangkok.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2907658]here are some bright spots, such as food prices, though. Household buying power is also up over the past year as wage growth has outstripped inflation.[/QUOTE]OMG, Mr. Lefetz may have been wrong then. What is up with that? A douche cannot read his own food bill?
"The average worker's "real" hourly earnings their pay after accounting for inflation increased 0. 6% from March 2023 to March 2024. It had earlier declined for two years during the Covid-19 pandemic as high inflation eroded workers' paycheck growth, but that trend has since reversed. ".
Oops, sorry, Mr. Lefetz, you are right. Thailand Tooms is just cherry picking the data.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2907658]Despite the historic Trump's Pandemic Global Supply-Chain Collapse Inflation and all of Trump's other Worst President of All Time disastrous economic and national security policy and stewardship results that you were handed a scant 3 years ago as well as a typically dithering and incompetent Repub / Trump- appointed Fed Chairman to stumble and fumble the relatively easy job of reducing Trump's Inflation quickly and effectively, your histotic jobs creation legislation, policies and stewardship has still managed to increase wages so as to masterfully override the negative effects of it.[/QUOTE]And here we go again, Mr. Lefetz. But Trump blah, blah, blah.
Here is something Thailand Tooms is allergic to, all the facts, [URL]https://mishtalk.com/economics/fact-check-are-you-better-off-now-than-four-years-ago/[/URL].
Private workers make 7 cents more per hour than a year ago, 4 cents more per hour than two years ago, 24 cents less per hour than three years ago, and 61 cents less per hour than in March of 2020 during the pandemic.
Production and nonsupervisory workers make 7 cents more per hour than a year ago, 15 cents more per hour than two years ago, 6 cents less per hour than three years ago, and 37 cents less per hour than in March of 2020 during the pandemic.
Gee thanks, Joe.
And there is more in the article with 57 to 66% of the people in the seven swing states saying the economy is not so good / poor.
Who knew that letting in millions of immigrants would cause rents to skyrocket?
-
Never known an Elvis who did not speak the Truth
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2907987]OMG, Mr. Lefetz may have been wrong then. What is up with that? A douche cannot read his own food bill?
"The average worker's "real" hourly earnings their pay after accounting for inflation increased 0. 6% from March 2023 to March 2024. It had earlier declined for two years during the Covid-19 pandemic as high inflation eroded workers' paycheck growth, but that trend has since reversed. ".
Oops, sorry, Mr. Lefetz, you are right. Thailand Tooms is just cherry picking the data.
And here we go again, Mr. Lefetz. But Trump blah, blah, blah.
Here is something Thailand Tooms is allergic to, all the facts, [URL]https://mishtalk.com/economics/fact-check-are-you-better-off-now-than-four-years-ago/[/URL].
Private workers make 7 cents more per hour than a year ago, 4 cents more per hour than two years ago, 24 cents less per hour than three years ago, and 61 cents less per hour than in March of 2020 during the pandemic.
Production and nonsupervisory workers make 7 cents more per hour than a year ago, 15 cents more per hour than two years ago, 6 cents less per hour than three years ago, and 37 cents less per hour than in March of 2020 during the pandemic.
Gee thanks, Joe.
And there is more in the article with 57 to 66% of the people in the seven swing states saying the economy is not so good / poor.
Who knew that letting in millions of immigrants would cause rents to skyrocket?[/QUOTE]Thanks Elvis.
I was watching Fox recently in Australia. Do you guys realise you are now a joke.Thanks to Joe and Cammy …They were talking about the American Indigenous getting tax breaks. I turn over to Sky Australia and they are taking about our indigenous getting the same breaks. Wow we are mirroring your every leftist move. Awful. Our immigration is sky rocketing our PM wants to be Joe. Ha. He is not that bad. But very close.
Can you blokes defend his stance on Gaza …yes or no..
Also I noted with interest how a couple of the boys love to use stats against The Great Don…
Looking at the CPI figures today ….well…another stat in favour of the Great man…
Someone please help us.
If The great man. Don Trump does not win the next election.
The world is Fu….d
-
4 years ago today?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2907987]OMG, Mr. Lefetz may have been wrong then. What is up with that? A douche cannot read his own food bill?
"The average worker's "real" hourly earnings their pay after accounting for inflation increased 0. 6% from March 2023 to March 2024. It had earlier declined for two years during the Covid-19 pandemic as high inflation eroded workers' paycheck growth, but that trend has since reversed. ".
Oops, sorry, Mr. Lefetz, you are right. Thailand Tooms is just cherry picking the data.
And here we go again, Mr. Lefetz. But Trump blah, blah, blah.
Here is something Thailand Tooms is allergic to, all the facts, [URL]https://mishtalk.com/economics/fact-check-are-you-better-off-now-than-four-years-ago/[/URL].
Private workers make 7 cents more per hour than a year ago, 4 cents more per hour than two years ago, 24 cents less per hour than three years ago, and 61 cents less per hour than in March of 2020 during the pandemic.[/QUOTE]Uh. Joe Biden was not elected "four years ago today" to clean up the colossal mess of everything all around the world that Donald J. Trump produced despite Trump being handed a better set of conditions than any outgoing Repub ever handed an incoming Dem.
Nope.
He was elected to do that 7 horrific months later and then took office 2 1/2 even more horrific months after that. That would be after all of Trump's fine economic and national security policies and stewardship results came to full fruition and were very, very busy decimating global supply chains, destroying worldwide economies, wiping out millions upon millions of jobs, mass murdering millions of people, etc, etc, etc. But it was sure as hell well on its way to those ultimate Worst President in History results.
Nice try, though.
-
Oh?
[QUOTE=Tlito;2908009]Thanks Elvis.
I was watching Fox recently in Australia. Do you guys realise you are now a joke.Thanks to Joe and Cammy They were talking about the American Indigenous getting tax breaks. I turn over to Sky Australia and they are taking about our indigenous getting the same breaks. Wow we are mirroring your every leftist move. Awful. Our immigration is sky rocketing our PM wants to be Joe. Ha. He is not that bad. But very close.
Can you blokes defend his stance on Gaza yes or no..
Also I noted with interest how a couple of the boys love to use stats against The Great Don
Looking at the CPI figures today .wellanother stat in favour of the Great man
Someone please help us.
If The great man. Don Trump does not win the next election.
The world is Fu.d[/QUOTE]So you were watching Fux News, huh? LOL. Well, that explains why you are so clueless about virtually everything important.
Explain whose position on Gaza? Biden's or Netanyahu's?
Well, it isn't Biden's war, but Biden's position on Gaza is to encourage a cease fire for the sake of the people of Gaza and Israel.
The George W. Bush and Donald J. Trump of Israel, Netanyahu's position is to keep whatever slaughter his spectacular national security incompetence allowed to begin going as long as it takes to provide the distraction from his criminal charges he was hoping for.
-
2 photos
I thought everyone loved polls?
We haven't had an update on the polls lately but some interesting changes have been in the works since Sleepy, Can't Put Two Words Together, Doesn't Know Who or Where he Is, Laughing Stock Joe Biden delivered his State of the Union Address and began campaigning in earnest.
It seems the typically pro Repub Mainstream Media got it a tad wrong when they were insisting Biden's speech and presentation didn't earn him a bump in the polls and, oh my goodness, might have even made them worse for him.
Remember when that same typically pro MSM was getting everyone all excited about those polls showing Trump 5-7 points ahead of Biden in the head-to-head, the 5-way and the battleground state poll consensus?
Hmm. As of this writing, just 5 weeks after that terrific SOTU Address, Biden is now 0. 2 points from Trump in the head-to-head consensus, less that 2 points from him in the 5-way contest, 2. 7 points (less than half of what it was 5 weeks ago) in the battleground states. A statistical tie and well within a normal +/-MoE on all counts, cutting Trump's pre SOTU Address lead at least in half and way more than that on most issues.
And that is in the RealClearPolitics' consensus polls on those topics, a demonstrably Winger-leaning site.
[URL]https://www.realclearpolitics.com/[/URL]
Oh, and this is the most interesting item in that regard. The Presidential Betting Odds sites were showing Trump way ahead of Biden ore SOTU. Not anymore. Now their RCP consensus shows Trump only 0. 5 point ahead of Biden. And take a gander at the trajectory of that Blue / Biden graph line vs the Red / Trump graph line! LOL. Wow.
[URL]https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/betting-odds/2024/president/[/URL]
See, those Presidential Betting Odds sites don't merely look at a consensus of polls. They factor in everything they deem important, such as the direction of the polls, money, the expenditure of money, the ground game, the competence of each campaign and so on.
Interesting, huh?
-
2 photos
Correction
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2908050]We haven't had an update on the polls lately but some interesting changes have been in the works since Sleepy, Can't Put Two Words Together, Doesn't Know Who or Where he Is, Laughing Stock Joe Biden delivered his State of the Union Address and began campaigning in earnest.
It seems the typically pro Repub Mainstream Media got it a tad wrong when they were insisting Biden's speech and presentation didn't earn him a bump in the polls and, oh my goodness, might have even made them worse for him.
Remember when that same typically pro MSM was getting everyone all excited about those polls showing Trump 5-7 points ahead of Biden in the head-to-head, the 5-way and the battleground state poll consensus?
Hmm. As of this writing, just 5 weeks after that terrific SOTU Address, Biden is now 0. 2 points from Trump in the head-to-head consensus, less that 2 points from him in the 5-way contest, 2. 7 points (less than half of what it was 5 weeks ago) in the battleground states. A statistical tie and well within a normal +/-MoE on all counts, cutting Trump's pre SOTU Address lead at least in half and way more than that on most issues.
And that is in the RealClearPolitics' consensus polls on those topics, a demonstrably Winger-leaning site.
[URL]https://www.realclearpolitics.com/[/URL]
Oh, and this is the most interesting item in that regard. The Presidential Betting Odds sites were showing Trump way ahead of Biden ore SOTU. Not anymore. Now their RCP consensus shows Trump only 0. 5 point ahead of Biden. And take a gander at the trajectory of that Blue / Biden graph line vs the Red / Trump graph line! LOL. Wow.
[URL]https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/betting-odds/2024/president/[/URL]
See, those Presidential Betting Odds sites don't merely look at a consensus of polls. They factor in everything they deem important, such as the direction of the polls, money, the expenditure of money, the ground game, the competence of each campaign and so on.
Interesting, huh?[/QUOTE]Slight correction. I meant to type that now BIDEN is ahead of TRUMP by 0. 5 point in the RealClearPolitics' Presidential Betting Odds consensus.
And you know what that sneaky little demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP site did to show Biden's lead in that category no greater than 0. 5 point for now? 2-3 days ago when Trump was still clinging to a 0. 2 point lead over Biden they only factored in 5 different Betting sites. But the instant Biden took a commanding lead on Predictlt, historically the most accurately predictive of the group, RCP hustled in a 6th site with a closer rating between the two candidates in order to keep Biden's current lead over Trump a wee bit lower. LOL.
Mind you, that cute skyrocketing upward trajectory for Biden and fish hook shaped decline for Trump as you see in that Pic I posted previously began right after Biden's SOTU Address, has been happening for weeks, well before the latest Arizona and Florida events in response to Trump / Repubs' recent victories in their mission to Outlaw Sex For Pleasure, as has been a Classic Repub Party mission for several decades.
Ah. Here it is. See what demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP did there? The pic with only 5 Presidential Betting Odds sites factored in was from just a day or two ago, when Trump still held a 0. 2 point lead over Biden. By contrast, the pic showing Biden with a 0. 5 point lead over Trump is from today. And a 6th site showing Biden and Trump closer than that has suddenly, mysteriously and magically come out of nowhere to join the group and be factored in.
LOL. So funny.
-
[QUOTE=Tlito;2908009]
I was watching Fox recently in Australia. [/QUOTE]And how did it affect you -- watching Fox in Australia? Is Fox more honest and less propagand-esque in Australia than it is in America? Is it more pro-Putin or less? Please enlighten us.
[QUOTE=Tlito;2908009]If The great man. Don Trump does not win the next election.
The world is Fu.d[/QUOTE]Really?
But he already had his 4 years. What stopped him from saving the world? And what do you think he'll do differently next time?
By the way, you don't have to censor yourself on this forum. If you believe the world is fucked -- go ahead and scream it from the rooftops. You're welcome.
-
Vietnam Trump like R/E billionaire cheat and fruadster, gets the DEATH sentence...
Vietnamese R/E developer sentenced to death for fraud of $12.5 billion dollars, the countrys largest financial fraud case ever.
[b]Vietnam sentences real estate tycoon to death in $12.5 billion fraud case[/b]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/vietnam-sentences-real-estate-tycoon-death-fraud-rcna147329[/URL]
I see now, what billionaire, [b]Kevin O'Leary,[/b] meant when he was talking to FOXY Muse Business, about Trump's R/E fraud case and says :[LIST][b][i]"...everything you've just listed off, is done by every R/E developer, everywhere on earth, in every city"[/i][/b] {...when referring to the over evaluation of Trump's tax R/E fraud claims...}
But was oh so wrong, when he then goes on to say [b][i]"...and this [type of thing] has never ever been prosecuted."[/i][/b][/LIST]I wonder if O'Leary would like to revise his prior statement, considering Vietnam's very strong laws and penalties against such Trumpian R/E fraud?
The Vietnamese judicial system is sending a clear message, that billionaire fraud, will NOT be tolerated and a DEATH sentence, awaits those who would entertain such brazen criminal behavior.
In light of these events in Vietnam and big mouth billionaires telling the world, this type of fraud is perfectly normal, one has to wonder, if the DOJ, IRS and FBI need to take a closer look at R/E over evaluations and fraud in general by R/E developers?
But the DEATH sentence, for criminal fraud on this scale is an interesting deterrent, for the billionaire class...well at least in Vietnam, anyways!
-
The Great Donald Trump
Gee it is just like I see on Fox.
A lot of people in the US support Crooked Joe. Ha. He can't even read and falls over all the time and lets millions of people in to destroy and kill your own. Wow. You Yankies are different.
Then there is Nancy. Ha.
And Hillary. Ha ha ha.
And Hunter. Give me a break.
And the insurrection. People still locked up. But Black Lives Matter. Um.wtf.
I know I am a racist. Ha ha. The answer to every argument.
Gee you Demolunies have tried every thing including 91 joke charges.(if one of the charges were not a joke. He would be locked up) but he is still free and WILL be the next President of the USA.
Thanks God for making my life so much fun. And especially for Mr Donny Trump. And the funny dudes on this site.
Whilst ever Donny Trump is around and the Demolunes are not in power. The world has a chance.
-
He obviously can't think of one thing
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2908176]And how did it affect you -- watching Fox in Australia? Is Fox more honest and less propagand-esque in Australia than it is in America? Is it more pro-Putin or less? Please enlighten us.
Really?
But he already had his 4 years. What stopped him from saving the world? And what do you think he'll do differently next time?
By the way, you don't have to censor yourself on this forum. If you believe the world is fucked -- go ahead and scream it from the rooftops. You're welcome.[/QUOTE]He has already posted his high praise for "The Great Donald Trump" a couple of times here, maybe more than that using a different name and he has yet to cite one positive thing Trump did in those 4 years as great as Biden's worst day in office.
As near as we can tell, he is simply damned impressed that Trump is too fat to get one leg over the crossbar of a bicycle and therefore has never been caught on video falling off of one.
-
[QUOTE=Tlito;2908245]Gee it is just like I see on Fox.
A lot of people in the US support Crooked Joe. Ha. He can't even read and falls over all the time and lets millions of people in to destroy and kill your own. Wow. You Yankies are different.
Then there is Nancy. Ha.
And Hillary. Ha ha ha.
And Hunter. Give me a break.
And the insurrection. People still locked up. But Black Lives Matter. Um.wtf.
I know I am a racist. Ha ha. The answer to every argument.
Gee you Demolunies have tried every thing including 91 joke charges.(if one of the charges were not a joke. He would be locked up) but he is still free and WILL be the next President of the USA.
Thanks God for making my life so much fun. And especially for Mr Donny Trump. And the funny dudes on this site.
Whilst ever Donny Trump is around and the Demolunes are not in power. The world has a chance.[/QUOTE]Well, the MSNBC listening, NYT reading Demolunes / Democrat douches do not read or listen to anything outside of their narrow lane. So whatever is said on Fox, they just dismiss. It is not even that Biden is running things. Biden was elected on being a white moderate Democrat and he has been anything but.
Presidents are credited or blamed for a lot of things that are beyond their control. I am not sure the economy is going to be great even if Trump gets elected given how much debt has been racked up, but you can see presidents make huge changes in foreign policy and relations between leaders.
Look at the twitter feed on this article of Biden talking to the Iranians about their rumored attack on Israel. [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-pressuring-china-turkey-saudi-arabia-intervene-iran-halt-attack-israel[/URL].
I have seen gnats more intimidating than Biden is. Is it any shock that Iran did not heed Biden's warning and launched an attack anyway? Now we are going to have pro-war douches like Xpartan saying an attack on Israel is an attack on the USA and want us to go to war with Iran.
With Biden and his administration, they have thought more of parading around military men in dresses than showing off the power of the military. What impresses their constituents is being laughed at in places like Iran. The reason we have a strong military is that you project such power that others are afraid to face you. We have the opposite now. We are projecting weakness.
Someone put up a meme on Twitter. On one side you have the face of Trump and the word peace. On the other it is the face of Biden and war. Biden was preparing to go to war from the day he got into office. That is something I saw with my own eyes. In fact, a buddy of mine told me that no president had not been re-elected in the midst of a war, and that seems to have been what Biden's plan was and it has blown up in his face.
-
Are "IMMIGRANTS"...the new right-wing boogeyman?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2907987] ... Who knew that letting in millions of immigrants would cause rents to skyrocket?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Tlito;2908245]Gee it is just like I see on Fox.[/QUOTE]
How to tell when you're drinking way too much of the FOXY Muse, right-wing [i][b]"scapegoat"[/b][/i] propaganda Kool-Aid?
You Guessed it!
[LIST]Now EVERYTHING is the [b]fault of the immigrants:[/b]
> COVID-19...it's the immigrants!
> No Job for Americans....it's the immigrants!
> High price of food...it's the immigrants!
> High gas prices...it's the immigrants!
> Crime...it's the immigrants!
> Voter fraud...blame the immigrants!
> Looming Gov't shutdown...blame the immigrants![/LIST]And the latest from our neighborhood resident conspiracist, Elvis 20008, after no doubt watching another fun filled FOXY Muse, disinformation "news" segment [i]{no doubt entitled} [b]"You
Guessed it America...it's the IMMIGRANTS!"[/b][/i]
And what must now be, the latest disinformation and lies being told to their gullible horde/viewers, is that:
> [i][b]"Immigrants[/b] are [u]responsible[/u] for your [b]increase in RENT"[/b][/i]
[b]Wall Street[/b] has purchased hundreds of thousands of single-family homes since the Great Recession. Here's what that means for rental prices.
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/21/how-wall-street-bought-single-family-homes-and-put-them-up-for-rent.html[/URL]
[b]Why Are REITs Going All-In on Single-Family Rentals?[/b]
[URL]https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/02/05/why-are-reits-going-all-in-on-single-family-rental/[/URL]
Meanwhile, the real culprits, the REITs, the billionaire class and the greedy corporations buying up single family homes and driving up rents as much as 30-40%, in some areas are laughing all the way to the bank, as gullible Americans (and some Aussies it would seem), drink-up the Kool-Aid over at FOXY Muse and spread disinformation and misinformation about, [i][b]"You Guessed IT...it's the IMMIGRANTS fault!"[/b][/i]
Is it any wonder Russia and Putin, just loves, these "useful idiots" (...kkkk!)
-
Repubs' hopeless, shamelessly opportunistic mindset on the issue of war
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2908343]Well, the MSNBC listening, NYT reading Demolunes / Democrat douches do not read or listen to anything outside of their narrow lane. So whatever is said on Fox, they just dismiss. It is not even that Biden is running things. Biden was elected on being a white moderate Democrat and he has been anything but.
Presidents are credited or blamed for a lot of things that are beyond their control. I am not sure the economy is going to be great even if Trump gets elected given how much debt has been racked up, but you can see presidents make huge changes in foreign policy and relations between leaders.
Look at the twitter feed on this article of Biden talking to the Iranians about their rumored attack on Israel. [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-pressuring-china-turkey-saudi-arabia-intervene-iran-halt-attack-israel[/URL].
I have seen gnats more intimidating than Biden is. Is it any shock that Iran did not heed Biden's warning and launched an attack anyway? Now we are going to have pro-war douches like Xpartan saying an attack on Israel is an attack on the USA and want us to go to war with Iran.
With Biden and his administration, they have thought more of parading around military men in dresses than showing off the power of the military. What impresses their constituents is being laughed at in places like Iran. The reason we have a strong military is that you project such power that others are afraid to face you. We have the opposite now. We are projecting weakness.
Someone put up a meme on Twitter. On one side you have the face of Trump and the word peace. On the other it is the face of Biden and war. Biden was preparing to go to war from the day he got into office. That is something I saw with my own eyes. In fact, a buddy of mine told me that no president had not been re-elected in the midst of a war, and that seems to have been what Biden's plan was and it has blown up in his face.[/QUOTE]Biden was preparing to go to war when he took over from Donnie while the USA War a previous Repub started was still being waged as it had been for every minute of every hour of every day of Donnie's entire so-called presidency until Biden pulled us out of it in the most successful and least deadly withdrawal from an occupied country by the losing side in History?
Is that really the kind of twisted pretzel nonsense one gets their heads filled with from watching too much Fux News and other Winger Clown Shows?
Let's recap the idiotic, unprincipled, spineless and opportunistic Repub mindset on war vs intelligent Dem handling of it from just the 4 most recent presidents, shall we?
GW Bush's astonishing incompetence with regard to ordinary National Security measures and Response plunges us into two Wars in the Middle East based on at least 900 lies told by him, his VP and others in his administration. The Repub response?
"You are either with us or against us. Bush is great! He kept us safe! Only America-haters oppose these wars"!
Obama takes office while both of Repub Bush's wars are raging and accomplishing nothing, as predicted. The Repub response?
"Obama is a Warmonger! Why are we still at War? Obama loves war and his fecklessness is plunging us into more wars"!
Obama pulls us out of one of those counterproductive Repub / Bush quagmire wars. The Repub response?
"Obama is a coward! He pulled us out of that war too soon, too late, too big, too small and not in exactly the right way"!
Trump gets appointed so-called president by a handful of Electoral College appointees against the obvious will and wishes of the majority of the American electorate and proceeds to happily preside over the second USA war the previous Repub plunged us into for every minute of every hour of every day of his so-called presidency. The Repub response?
"Trump is a Great Man of Peace! He kept us out of war! There were NO WARS anywhere on Earth under Trump because every world leader feared and respected him! He kept us safe! Oh, and his economic and National Security policies and stewardship results made sure the USA economy was the greatest of any country ever and not one American died from a foreign force or danger the entire time Trump The Good Shepherd watched over his flock. Trump is The God of Peace, Good Health and Prosperty"!
Biden takes over in the midst of the ongoing Repub war still raging under Trump for the entirety of his miserable 4 year term and, oh by the way, the absolute worst economic and national security conditions in USA history but still manages to finally pull us out of that second counterproductive Repub quagmire war. The Repub response?
"Biden is a Warmonger! Biden pulled us out of that glorious Repub war too soon, too late, too big, too small and not in exactly the right way! Oh, and he destroyed the perfect economy Trump handed him too! The Biden economy is Crashing so badly, jobs are being wiped out by the Millions and millions, wages are plunging, buying power is down to zero so of course the only thing on Biden's mind is to plunge us into another counterproductive Repub er I mean Dem War! Like the USA War in Ukraine. Er, I mean the USA War in Gaza. Er, I mean, well, whatever war and conflict is happening anywhere even though the USA is not really directly involved. Besides, remember there were NO WARS anywhere on Earth snd especially NO WAR involving the USA throughout Trump's glorious, best economy ever 4 years in office! Never forget that".
LOL. No sane, peace-loving, prosperty-loving American should waste one brain cell or one minute of their life giving serious consideration to anything any Repub has to say about War, Peace or the Economy.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2908360]And the latest from our neighborhood resident conspiracist, Elvis 20008, after no doubt watching another fun filled FOXY Muse, disinformation "news" segment [i]{no doubt entitled} [b]"You
Guessed it America...it's the IMMIGRANTS!"[/b][/i][/QUOTE]LOL. Do you get supply and demand? If you bring in 20 million immigrants and the supply of housing only slightly goes up, then the price on housing WILL go up.
Over time, things will balance out but for now, you can have your 20 million immigrants and higher rent prices. It is an either or situation. What else do you think was going to happen you unicorn farting soy boy?
And I blamed Biden for letting in the immigrants not the immigrants themselves but do not let facts get in the way of your rant.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2908360]Meanwhile, the real culprits, the REITs, the billionaire class and the greedy corporations buying up single family homes and driving up rents as much as 30-40%, in some areas are laughing all the way to the bank[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/pro-esg-chuck-schumer-top-recipient-blackrock-donations-2022[/URL]
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, d-n. y, this week mounted a vigorous defense of big investment firms' right to consider environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors when evaluating their investment decisions. But a conservative ethics watchdog is calling out the Democratic leader for being the top campaign donation recipient from BlackRock one of the leading advocates of sustainable investing.
BlackRock is an unapologetic advocate for ESG, which has come under fire from Republican politicians who have accused corporations of going "woke" by basing investment decisions on climate impact, diversity, or other factors they associate with a liberal agenda.
End of link.
Ah yes, those wealthy Wall Street types are not just Democratic douches pushing up rents. These are the assholes who brought politics to investing. An ESG score is another way of saying how Democrat friendly your company is.
So while Blackrock is stuffing its portfolio with real estate investments pushing up the costs of renting and home ownership on middle America, they dole out a few $ to pols and promote this ESG bullshit and douches like you fall for their crap. Oh, Blackrock is soooo great.
Hey, Soy Boy, can you read a map? You do know Wall Street is in the bluest of blue states right?
-
2 photos
More Funny RCP Poll Consensus Shenanigans
Ordinarily I wouldn't bother visiting any polling site all that often. But the shenanigans that demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics goes through to keep their beloved Trump / Repubs looking like loveable "winners" everyone ought to be siding with is just too blatantly obvious and fun to track. LOL.
How do you even up the President Betting Odds consensus between Trumpty-Dumpty and Joe Biden heading into the Sunday political shows so the pro Repub "Bothsiders" can claim all due diligence overviews of everything important to factor in shows it a tie instead of showing Biden taking the lead?
Simple. You just eliminate one of the President Betting Odds sites that had Biden ahead by a point (maybe more today) and, bingo, Trump and Biden are now dead even at 41.5 each!
[URL]https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/betting-odds/2024/president/[/URL]
Note the screenshot from the day before with five sites factored into the consensus showing Biden with a growing lead to 42.8 over Trump's 42.0 compared to today's screenshot of it down to just four sites that will at least show them in a tie for those Sunday political show pundits to disregard as anything worth mentioning, at best.
And that is how demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP does it, folks.
-
American Billionaire Greed...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2908519]LOL. Do you get supply and demand? If you [b]bring in 20 million immigrants[/b] and the supply of housing only slightly goes up, then the price on housing WILL go up.
Over time, things will balance out but for now, you can have your 20 million immigrants and higher rent prices. It is an either or situation. What else do you think was going to happen you unicorn farting soy boy?
And I blamed Biden for letting in the immigrants not the immigrants themselves but do not let facts get in the way of your rant. [/QUOTE] (...kkkk!) Perhaps you missed where I said, [i]"Meanwhile, the real culprits, the REITs, the billionaire class and the greedy corporations buying up single family homes and driving up rents as much as 30-40%",[/i] hence manipulating and exacerbating, the availability of reasonable rents and taking away affordable housing for American families.
BTW, what publication/source did you get your [i]"bring in 20 million immigrants"[/i] number from? Or did you just pull, this data outta your ass, from the 1920's?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2908519]
[URL]https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/pro-esg-chuck-schumer-top-recipient-blackrock-donations-2022[/URL]
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, d-n. y, this week mounted a vigorous defense of big investment firms' right to consider environmental, social and governance (ESG) ...
Hey, Soy Boy, can you read a map? You do know Wall Street is in the bluest of blue states right?[/QUOTE]
Yeah, all you're backwards ass [b]shuckin' n jivin'[/b], won't hide the real facts about most of the wealthiest on Wall St. and the billionaire class, being as [b]"ruby red"[/b] as a "pig in a poke", as they all line up around the block and hedge their bets (with large donations to Trump's Truth Social, DJT), for yet another 2-trillion dollar Trump tax break for billionaires, but fuck avg. Americans.
[b]US billionaires have doubled their wealth since 2017 Trump tax overhaul [/b]
[URL]https://www.salon.com/2024/04/11/us-billionaires-have-doubled-their-wealth-since-2017-overhaul/[/URL]
-
Commercial Real Estate
Meanwhile, commercial real estate, shopping malls, etc, etc continues to tank. Will the genius's on this thread care to blame the poor, the wretched leaving their homes in the south for safety and economic stability in El Norte? Did they sit on the border with a clicker, counting out the, what was it, 20,000,000 now. Have they studied the history of United Fruit Company mucking about? The numerous coups, South American soldiers trained by US military in "counter insurgency" . The weapons that left Mina, Arkansas bound for the Contras in Honduras when Slick Willy Clinton was the governor? Read "Blowback" by Chalmers Johnson. The "chaos" in Haiti is a direct result of US oligarchs calling the shots. This quote from Jim Jatmusch's "Down by Law" "The US is a melting pot. The scum rises to the top".
-
Deadbeat Fake Billionaire Trump Knows All The Best People
Unfortunately for Deadbeat Fake Billionaire Sleepy Donald Trump, the best people he knows with any serious money to loan also know him too well to loan him the tiny percentage of money from any real billionaire's net worth to keep his ass out of jail.
[B]A possible Trump bond rejection? NY AG questions if insurance group is good for the money.[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/04/05/possible-trump-bond-rejection/73216105007/[/URL]
LOL. This is how much a real billionaire can part with any and every year for the greater good of America:
[B]Mark Cuban says he's proud to pay $288 million in taxes this year, unlike a certain former president.[/B]
[URL]https://www.businessinsider.com/mark-cuban-proud-to-pay-taxes-unlike-certain-ex-president-2024-4[/URL]
[QUOTE]"I pay what I owe. Tomorrow I will wire transfer to the IRS $288,000,000.00," Cuban wrote on X on Sunday.
"This country has done so much for me, I'm proud to pay my taxes every single year. Tag a former president that you know doesn't," Cuban added, in what appeared to be a jab at former President Donald Trump.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2908817] Yeah, all you're backwards ass [b]shuckin' n jivin'[/b], won't hide the real facts about most of the wealthiest on Wall St. and the billionaire class, being as [b]"ruby red"[/b] as a "pig in a poke", as they all line up around the block and hedge their bets (with large donations to Trump's Truth Social, DJT), for yet another 2-trillion dollar Trump tax break for billionaires, but fuck avg. Americans.
[b]US billionaires have doubled their wealth since 2017 Trump tax overhaul [/b]
[URL]https://www.salon.com/2024/04/11/us-billionaires-have-doubled-their-wealth-since-2017-overhaul/[/URL][/QUOTE]Spidy, obviously like Thailand Tooms, you are living abroad on your government checks completely oblivious to the workings of America. You knock down anything you don't like as MAGA, QAnon, or whatever. You completely have your head in the sand when it comes to who the wealthy support.
With Biden, if you are wealthy and own stocks and real estate, you have done well. If you rent and are paycheck to paycheck, you have gotten killed under Biden.
If you go to this video and watch from the 1:57 mark for one minute, you will see the most definitive evidence of why Biden will lose: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_q9O7zJEw8[/URL].
This is not Fox News. This is MSNBC polling undecided voters in swing states and every fucking one of them says Trump's policies helped them and Biden's economic policies hurt them.
I kind of wonder what kind of bullshit you will say to make yourselves feel better after you watch this. Maybe you will take the Thailand Tooms route and blame the editing. When that fucker Fauci said you could get AIDS just living with a child with AIDS, he was not shown to be the fucking idiot that he was. No, per the loon Thailand Tooms, it was just editing.
As for where the number 20 million comes from, that is just a guesstimate of how many illegals are here. No one really knows. The guessestimate from Border Patrol is that 10 million illegals have entered under Biden. So while you play this dumb game of Gotcha Elvis, it is 10 million not 20 million, you are oblivious to the plights of the cities taking in the illegals and people paying rent.
All you give a shit about is your government check.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2908643]Simple. You just eliminate one of the President Betting Odds sites that had Biden ahead by a point (maybe more today) and, bingo, Trump and Biden are now dead even at 41.5 each!
Note the screenshot from the day before with five sites factored into the consensus showing Biden with a growing lead to 42.8 over Trump's 42.0 compared to today's screenshot of it down to just four sites that will at least show them in a tie for those Sunday political show pundits to disregard as anything worth mentioning, at best.
And that is how demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP does it, folks.[/QUOTE]And Thailand Tooms is at it again. Hey, if you want a site where the betting makes you feel good, you should go here, [URL]https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7456/Who-will-win-the-2024-US-presidential-election[/URL].
Does that make you feel better Thailand Tooms? Maybe you need it after that MSNBC post showing how badly Biden's policies hurt middle America.
Thing is there have been articles on how the predict it futures markets are being manipulated. So I was like, what are the odds of an actual site that will let you bet on the election?
[URL]https://www.vegasinsider.com/odds/us-presidential-election/[/URL]#text=Trump%20 remains%20 the%20 slight%20 favorite, to%20 repeat%20 as%20 USA %20 President.
And this is from April 12:
Trump remains the slight favorite at 6/5 (Bet $100 to win $120) to capture the 2024 USA Presidential Election.
Joe Biden is sitting at 5/4 odds (Bet $100 to win $125) to repeat as USA President.
Oddsmakers are currently offering plus-money returns on both candidates for the upcoming face-off between Trump and Biden.
Trump remains the slight favorite at 6/5 (Bet $100 to win $120) to capture the 2024 USA Presidential Election.
Joe Biden is sitting at 5/4 odds (Bet $100 to win $125) to repeat as USA President.
So what percent of your government checks are you going to bet on Biden?
-
I already mentioned Predictlt specifically
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2908917]And Thailand Tooms is at it again. Hey, if you want a site where the betting makes you feel good, you should go here, [URL]https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7456/Who-will-win-the-2024-US-presidential-election[/URL].
Does that make you feel better Thailand Tooms? Maybe you need it after that MSNBC post showing how badly Biden's policies hurt middle America.
Thing is there have been articles on how the predict it futures markets are being manipulated. So I was like, what are the odds of an actual site that will let you bet on the election?
[URL]https://www.vegasinsider.com/odds/us-presidential-election/[/URL]#text=Trump%20 remains%20 the%20 slight%20 favorite, to%20 repeat%20 as%20 USA %20 President.
And this is from April 12:
Trump remains the slight favorite at 6/5 (Bet $100 to win $120) to capture the 2024 USA Presidential Election.
Joe Biden is sitting at 5/4 odds (Bet $100 to win $125) to repeat as USA President.
Oddsmakers are currently offering plus-money returns on both candidates for the upcoming face-off between Trump and Biden.
Trump remains the slight favorite at 6/5 (Bet $100 to win $120) to capture the 2024 USA Presidential Election.
Joe Biden is sitting at 5/4 odds (Bet $100 to win $125) to repeat as USA President.
So what percent of your government checks are you going to bet on Biden?[/QUOTE]Yes, I already mentioned Predictlt as one of the President Betting Odds sites that RealClearPolitics includes in their Consensus for that topic.
But the point of my posts wasn't exactly how each candidate is faring in that regard at the moment but to show how demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP is in the way they manipulate, delay, rush in and / or otherwise time the inclusion of certain polls in order to keep their beloved Trump and other Repubs either ahead in those Consensus polls or at least even with Biden and the Dems.
Well, I did mention in passing that remarkable skyrocketing upward trajectory in the Odds for Biden and fish hook reversal of fortune decline in it for Trump since Joe Biden's terrific State of the Union Address pretty much destroyed the main Trump / GOP campaign spin against him for 3 solid years.
But now that you have gone directly to the Predictlt site for their Odds, I will now mention that I saw that 53 number for Biden on their site several days ago. Yet RCP has not posted that number for Predictlt on their site but is instead still hanging in there with more like 47-49, keeping it closer overall between Biden and everyone else in that Consensus than Predictlt has it as long as humanly possible. Apparently.
LOL. I see idiot Trump-lover Repub Gov. Sununu is out there proclaiming that "51% of Americans" agree with him that they would rather have Trump in the WH than Biden. Liar. Even demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP can't manipulate the poll consensus enough to create a 51% lead for Trump. Not in a head-to-head or a 5-way hypothetical. Biden gets as many 50% results in the RCP polls as Trump does and nowhere in any Consensus is Trump higher than 45.6%.
-
They got you again.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2908911]Spidy, obviously like Thailand Tooms, you are living abroad on your government checks completely oblivious to the workings of America. You knock down anything you don't like as MAGA, QAnon, or whatever. You completely have your head in the sand when it comes to who the wealthy support.
With Biden, if you are wealthy and own stocks and real estate, you have done well. If you rent and are paycheck to paycheck, you have gotten killed under Biden.
If you go to this video and watch from the 1:57 mark for one minute, you will see the most definitive evidence of why Biden will lose: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_q9O7zJEw8[/URL].
This is not Fox News. This is MSNBC polling undecided voters in swing states and every fucking one of them says Trump's policies helped them and Biden's economic policies hurt them.
I kind of wonder what kind of bullshit you will say to make yourselves feel better after you watch this. Maybe you will take the Thailand Tooms route and blame the editing. When that fucker Fauci said you could get AIDS just living with a child with AIDS, he was not shown to be the fucking idiot that he was. No, per the loon Thailand Tooms, it was just editing.
As for where the number 20 million comes from, that is just a guesstimate of how many illegals are here. No one really knows. The guessestimate from Border Patrol is that 10 million illegals have entered under Biden. So while you play this dumb game of Gotcha Elvis, it is 10 million not 20 million, you are oblivious to the plights of the cities taking in the illegals and people paying rent.
All you give a shit about is your government check.[/QUOTE]Uh. Where are the outrageously negative comments about Trump from "undecideds"/ Independents that appeared in that MSNBC segment?
Oh, you didn't know there were any? You just thought that idiot YouTube video included all of the negative comments the gathered "undecideds" had to offer and it was only about Biden?
LOL.
You have been blissfully easily bamboozled again, Culty McGullible.
First of all, if after 4 years of observing Trump and experiencing his Pandemic, massive jobs destruction, his 2 Bear Market declines in just 4 years, rising crime rates and USA at War for the entirety of his so-called presidency vs 3 1/2 years of Biden's historic job gains and wage increases, Stock Market gains, plunging crime rates and NO USA at War anywhere on the planet, any self-proclaimed "undecideds" at this point are by definition extremely low low low low information voters. Possibly comatose most of the time.
And speaking of the stock market, where is that one numbskull hearing Joe Bidrn "only talking about the stock market all the time"? LOL. He must be as easily bamboozled by creatively and tightly edited YouTube Winger videos as you are.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2908519]LOL. Do you get supply and demand? If you bring in 20 million immigrants and the supply of housing only slightly goes up, then the price on housing WILL go up.[/QUOTE]Bring in? 20 millions? Here's Elvis again in all his splendor.
"Nearly 10 million migrants attempted to enter the US between October 2019 and January 2024, with record-high border apprehensions in 2022. ".
[URL]https://usafacts.org/articles/what-can-the-data-tell-us-about-unauthorized-immigration/[/URL]
Of course, "attempting to enter" doesn't equate to entering, but why focus on the details when you have a cool round number!
-
Do you hear yourself?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2908911] ... As for where the number 20 million comes from, that is just a guesstimate of how many illegals are here. No one really knows. The guessestimate from Border Patrol is that 10 million illegals have entered under Biden. So while you play this dumb game of Gotcha Elvis, it is 10 million not 20 million, you are oblivious to the plights of the cities taking in the illegals and people paying rent.[/QUOTE]Sometimes, I have to wonder, do you even read what you write?
How exactly do you expect a reader to RESPECT what you wrote, when you're throwing up wild numbers, unsubstantiated with anything related, that would even persuade a reader to think, you might be right?
Sorry, but I'm not one of your fellow [b]gullible FOXY Muse loyalists![/b]
-
Speaking of substantiating facts and something called INTEGRITY...
[QuOTE=Elvis 2008;2908343]Well, the MSNBC listening, NYT reading Demolunes / Democrat douches do not read or listen to anything outside of their narrow lane. So whatever is said on Fox, [b]they just dismiss it.[/b] ... [/QUOTE] No, no, no...I think you'd be wrong, as to think Dems would [b]dismiss[/b] such LIES over at FOXY Muse. It's pretty hard to dismiss, when the LIES and disinformation are so blatantly offensive, that they [b]SLAP you in the face[/b] as incredibly scurrilous, contemptuous and often baseless or marred in Russian propaganda.
I think it's perhaps more to do with the fact that [u][b]Dems, don't like being lied to[/u][/b], misinformed and spoon-fed by Putin and his Russian disinformation propaganda campaign, to gullible news media like FOXY Muse and it's "ground breaking coverage of lies", it's regular list of Russian Repub House "useful idiots" and the like, spouting QAnon [i]"Jewish Space Lasers"[/i] conspiracies, or for that matter conspiracies about [i]"Italian spy satellites"[/i] hacking our very secure, safe, free and fair election voting system or machines.
[LIST]Another ISGer, from a previous convo, sums up FOXY Muse, with "laser" like precision:
[QUOTE=The Cane;2882721]But here's the kicker. [b]Their loyal audience [u]knows they lie but they don't care[/u][/b] so long as the "conservative" media tells them what they want to hear (I put conservative in quotes because these "outfits" do conservatism a great injustice). They (the conservative audience) don't want to know the truth (they can't handle it), and "news outlets" like FOX were eager to serve up the lies to feed their own bottom lines.
That is until they got slapped with an $800 million dollar settlement. What's that bottom line look like now? Not as bad as Rudy's LMAO! Another liar! Their all getting theirs. And good! The sweetest will be when Trump finally goes down. He will. Be patient.[/QUOTE][/LIST]On the left, we unapologetically, demand a certain high-level of journalism, from our news sources, that requires something over at FOXY Muse, know very little, to nothing about (which is understandable, since they don't really see themselves as a real NEWS organization).
Yes, that "something", is called [b]Journalistic Integrity[/b].
Which when translated for those on the right unfamiliar with the term, means the ability to report the truth, the facts, that are corroborated, substantiated, verified and validated, from trusted and reliable sources, that adhere to industry ethical and journalistic standards.
So I think it's safe to say, at FOXY Muse, neither they nor their "gullible" loyal watchers, care much for integrity, much less deliver a certain level of professionalism, commensurate with that expected from one of journalistic integrity.
-
Guesstimates are 🚫 not facts
Nor are "alternative facts" How many hundreds of millions did Fox News pay to settle the Dominion Voting machine lawsuit? More lawsuits are pending. How about a "guesstimate" of how many undocumented immigrants that work, own businesses and pay taxes vs oligarchs that pay no taxes?
-
Missing the forest for the trees
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2909007]Bring in? 20 millions? Here's Elvis again in all his splendor.
"Nearly 10 million migrants attempted to enter the US between October 2019 and January 2024, with record-high border apprehensions in 2022. ".
[URL]https://usafacts.org/articles/what-can-the-data-tell-us-about-unauthorized-immigration/[/URL]
Of course, "attempting to enter" doesn't equate to entering, but why focus on the details when you have a cool round number![/QUOTE]The funniest thing about the Repubs' obsession with the relatively insignificant issue of border crossings, certainly relative to the damage done to America by the Trump / Repubs' historic incompetence and traitorous hatred for America and democracy around the world, is those crossings have obviously and verifiably done nothing to reduce the number of newly created good and higher wage jobs for any American who wants one under Biden, nothing to reverse the plunging crime rates across the country as well as in border towns and sanctuary cities under Biden, nothing to slow down the unprecedented worldwide March toward more American / Western democratic alliances under Biden.
Hell, Trump's appointed and befuddled Fed Chairman probably wishes those crossings would finally show some meaningful sign of tamping down Bidenomics' greatest jobs creation and wage gains results to do for the current modest rate of inflation what his clumsy guidance has failed to do after three years.
Again and as usual, the only real threat to any of those truly significant Biden / Dem accomplishnents for keeping America the greatest and most Economically successful country on Earth with the most powerful and effective National Security is The Republican Party, the Pink Tinkle Repub Majority in the House, the Repubs in the Senate, the Repub Majority in the Supreme Court and, of course, their America-hating cult leader Donald Trump. Not border-crossing asylum-seekers.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2909019]Sometimes, I have to wonder, do you even read what you write?
[/QUOTE]Do you? The point was that illegals have driven up rents and are bankrupting the USA. Do you think ONLY 10 million illegals have entered the USA since Biden was president versus 20 million is a winning issue? Trump is clobbering Biden on the immigration issue. Your outrage over the number just shows how morally bankrupt your position is.
-
[QUOTE=Beijing4987;2909036]Guesstimates are 🚫 not facts[/QUOTE]LOL. But you Democratic douches sure swallowed up the guesstimate on where Covid came from right? It did not come from a lab and anyone blaming China was racist right?
Hell, you probably still think Covid came from nature and not a lab.
-
Repub douches looked hard and found no smoking gun on that issue
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2909227]LOL. But you Democratic douches sure swallowed up the guesstimate on where Covid came from right? It did not come from a lab and anyone blaming China was racist right?
Hell, you probably still think Covid came from nature and not a lab.[/QUOTE][B]Senate GOP Covid origins probe finds circumstantial evidence but no smoking gun to support lab leak theory.
May 17, 2023[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/17/politics/senate-gop-covid-origins-report/index.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]"What we present below is a substantial body of circumstantial evidence that supports the plausibility of such a scenario, the executive summary of Rubios report states about the lab leak theory, making clear the findings do not offer a definitive answer to the origins question.
Specifically, Rubios new report highlights evidence that Chinese government officials and relevant figures in the scientific community possessed some level of awareness of an outbreak of infectious disease well before that information was disclosed publicly on December 31, 2019.
It also notes that the congressional investigation unearthed information that further suggests there was some kind of serious biocontainment failure or accident at the state-run Wuhan Institute of Virology during the second half of 2019.[/QUOTE]Despite Repub douches looking and looking and looking very hard to find conclusive evidence that Trump's Pandemic virus originated in a lab leak rather than the overwhelmingly more common way in nature and then being brought to a lab where a leak can always occur (as if that makes any big deal difference at all. LOL), they did find plenty of evidence that, sure enough, if only Donald Trump had not stubbornly defunded and eliminated Obama's Early Warning / Pandemic Prevention teams from those labs contrary to all expert warnings not to do something as stupid and dangerous as that, the world would have had crucial weeks or months of advanced notice to have launched into the necessary isolation and quarantine in that area of China in order to have effectively Prevented Trump's Pandemic from developing in the first place and to have delayed the wider spread of it until well after fully tested and distributed vaccines for it had been distributed around the world.
As Donald Trump himself acknowledged in a March 2020 recorded interview with Bob Woodward.
Which would have saved millions of lives and averted the business, school and travel industry closures, the global supply-chain destruction, worldwide economic collapse and the inevitable hyper-inflation that followed.
Essentially every historic destruction and disaster that Trump had been warned for about a year prior would likely occur if he insisted on going forward with his planned typically Repub economic and national security policies and stewardship in that regard.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2909227]LOL. But you Democratic douches sure swallowed up the guesstimate on where Covid came from right? It did not come from a lab and anyone blaming China was racist right?
Hell, you probably still think Covid came from nature and not a lab.[/QUOTE]And here we go again. Watch yet another Elvis' escape to one of his happy places (COVID or AIDS) when he has lost the argument on the subject matter.
-
Yet another alumni Trump University...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2909036]Do you? The point was that illegals have driven up rents and are bankrupting the USA. Do you think ONLY 10 million illegals have entered the USA since Biden was president versus 20 million is a winning issue? [/QUOTE] (...kkkk!) Sure dude...sure!
I forget, Elvis 2008, must have taken accounting/math at Trump University. You know, the one that says, to arbitrarily deflate the numbers/asset valuations when in office/being taxed [b]and[/b] inflate the numbers when I'm out of office/going to the bank for a loan. If I'm not mistaken, Trump was found guilty and ordered to pay $355 million in tax fraud, for such fraudulent claims.
Yeah, attending Trump University would about sum up your nonsensical example, w/r to the numbers you're pulling outta your ass on immigration! (...kkkk!)
Meanwhile the billionaires have you and your FOXY Muse gullible minions, doing their biding, as Trump Tax cuts benefit the top 1%, while paying very little to nothing in federal taxes.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2909036]Trump is clobbering Biden on the immigration issue. Your outrage over the number just shows how morally bankrupt your position is.[/QUOTE]
Is that what you've been told at Foxy News? (Hint: If so, they're lying to you! ...kkkk!)
Sleepy Trumpy Trump is clobbering Biden?...NOT according to:[LIST] Democrat Tom Suozzi win the N.Y. 3rd district, 2024 special election (for the seat left vacant by George Santos), beating the Repub candidate, largely on [b]immigration,[/b] issues.[/LIST][LIST]Repub Chip Roy (R-TX), as it's abundantly clear, that the border problems and failure, were [b]ALL due to TRUMP![/b][/LIST][LIST]The CBPs estimated at-the-border apprehension rate averaged 78%, from 2018 to 2020, compared to 35% from 2002 to 2004.[/LIST][LIST]The beloved drafted bipartisan border security bill by the Senate and Sen. James Lankford (R-OK), that solves most everything Repubs want.[/LIST][LIST]The numerous election wins in 2022, 2023 and 2024, Democrats have demolished Repubs in elections, special elections and primaries, on primarily the number one issue that front and center for most Americans abortion, abortion bans, women's health and reproductive rights to choose.[/LIST]I'm still waiting for Trump, Repubs and the [b]INCEL He-man women haters[/b], such as yourself to make it pass the starting line on abortion, the continuing use of Misferpristone and Misoprostol, IVF and contraception.
Hint: If Repubs, want to win the presidential election race in 2024, they may want to take off the blinders on those women issues.
-
For Years Amazon paid 0$ in federal income tax...
[QUOTE=Beijing4987;2909036][b]Guesstimates are 🚫 not facts[/b]
Nor are "alternative facts" How many hundreds of millions did Fox News pay to settle the Dominion Voting machine lawsuit? More lawsuits are pending. How about a "guesstimate" of how many undocumented immigrants that work, own businesses and pay taxes vs oligarchs that pay no taxes? [/QUOTE]You bring up an excellent point!
Remember back in 2019, it became known that, immigrants paid more in taxes, than the multi-billion dollar corporation, Amazon, who had paid nothing ($0) in federal income taxes, since 2016.
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/15/tech/amazon-federal-income-tax/index.html[/URL]
[URL]https://www.vox.com/2019/2/20/18231742/amazon-federal-taxes-zero-corporate-income[/URL]
Just goes to show who's really bankrupting the country, while hiding behind the [I][b]"theatrical media hysteria"[/b][/I] on immigration from the right-wing Repub propaganda media apparatus over at likes of FOXY News and NewsMax.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2909331]Y
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/15/tech/amazon-federal-income-tax/index.html[/URL]
[URL]https://www.vox.com/2019/2/20/18231742/amazon-federal-taxes-zero-corporate-income[/URL]
Just goes to show who's really bankrupting the country, while hiding behind the [I][b]"theatrical media hysteria"[/b][/I] on immigration from the right-wing Repub propaganda media apparatus over at likes of FOXY News and NewsMax.[/QUOTE]And the biggest share holder and founder of Amazon is Jeff Bezos. He also owns the Washington Post. And you think he is a Republican? You keep railing against billionaires and do not get how many of them are Democrats. LOL. Thank God you have a handle on the facts "only 10 million illegals" Soy Boy.
[URL]https://www.socialexplorer.com/blog/post/americas-wealthiest-counties-became-bluer-in-the-2020-election-11047[/URL]
Among the 25 counties with the greatest concentrations of households earning more than six figures, President-elect Joe Biden won 16 two more than 2016 Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.
"I am Spidy. I have integrity. I know all the facts. " You are so full of it Soy Boy.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2909316]
I forget, Elvis 2008, must have taken accounting/math at Trump University. You know, the one that says, to arbitrarily deflate the numbers/asset valuations when in office/being taxed [b]and[/b] inflate the numbers when I'm out of office/going to the bank for a loan. If I'm not mistaken, Trump was found guilty and ordered to pay $355 million in tax fraud, for such fraudulent claims.[/QUOTE]Ah yes, soy boy, your fat flimsy tower of "integrity" is okay with using the law to punish someone breaking the law as long as it helps you. Hey, those 10 million illegals cross the border, and you are totally down with that. Yeah, two Democratic douches found Trump guilty of a victimless act right before the election in an effort to rig it, and it just happened to be in the year of an election. That was a shocker!
And now we have the latest.
Check out this potential Trump juror at the 4:47 mark.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojKFOsNZjgA[/URL]
This witch admits this case is not about the law. She says she is not a fan and talks about abortion, Covid, and Trump's policies. The one thing she does not mention is what Trump was accused of. She openly admits that which everyone knows. This is not about breaking the law. It is about rigging an election, and she hates Trump so much she does not even get how fucking selfish she is that she as a juror thinks she can choose who should be president more than the voters.
At this point, they should not even have a trial. The more honest thing to do is just find Trump guilty because New Yorkers do not like him. There has not been one speck of testimony but does there need to be? Anyone with a brain knows this jury will find Trump guilty.
And THIS is why Trump will win. Unlike you Soy Boy, a guy who supports people illegally crossing the border and stabs his own sex in the back, real Americans believe that voters and not Democratic juries and Democratic prosecutors should be picking who is president. That is why whenever Trump gets charges brought against him he goes up in the polls. The rigging of the 2020 election was done in secret. Shit, the rigging of the 2024 election is completely out in the open now.
But all you care about is your government check.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2909461]And the biggest share holder and founder of Amazon is Jeff Bezos. He also owns the Washington Post. And you think he is a Republican? You keep railing against billionaires and do not get how many of them are Democrats. LOL. Thank God you have a handle on the facts "only 10 million illegals" Soy Boy.
[URL]https://www.socialexplorer.com/blog/post/americas-wealthiest-counties-became-bluer-in-the-2020-election-11047[/URL]
Among the 25 counties with the greatest concentrations of households earning more than six figures, President-elect Joe Biden won 16 two more than 2016 Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.
"I am Spidy. I have integrity. I know all the facts. " You are so full of it Soy Boy.
Ah yes, soy boy, your fat flimsy tower of "integrity" is okay with using the law to punish someone breaking the law as long as it helps you. Hey, those 10 million illegals cross the border, and you are totally down with that. Yeah, two Democratic douches found Trump guilty of a victimless act right before the election in an effort to rig it, and it just happened to be in the year of an election. That was a shocker!
And now we have the latest.
Check out this potential Trump juror at the 4:47 mark.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojKFOsNZjgA[/URL]
This witch admits this case is not about the law. She says she is not a fan and talks about abortion, Covid, and Trump's policies. The one thing she does not mention is what Trump was accused of. She openly admits that which everyone knows. This is not about breaking the law. It is about rigging an election, and she hates Trump so much she does not even get how fucking selfish she is that she as a juror thinks she can choose who should be president more than the voters.
At this point, they should not even have a trial. The more honest thing to do is just find Trump guilty because New Yorkers do not like him. There has not been one speck of testimony but does there need to be? Anyone with a brain knows this jury will find Trump guilty.
And THIS is why Trump will win. Unlike you Soy Boy, a guy who supports people illegally crossing the border and stabs his own sex in the back, real Americans believe that voters and not Democratic juries and Democratic prosecutors should be picking who is president. That is why whenever Trump gets charges brought against him he goes up in the polls. The rigging of the 2020 election was done in secret. Shit, the rigging of the 2024 election is completely out in the open now.
But all you care about is your government check.[/QUOTE][B]"real Americans believe that voters and not Democratic juries and Democratic prosecutors should be picking who is president."[/B]
LOL. In which case it would have been a clean sweep for the Democratic candidate in every presidential election since and including 1992, thirty-two years ago, allowing for the fact that the only Repub to win slightly more votes than the Dem since then, in 2012, would never have been there to run as a Repub-initiated counterproductive quagmire Wartime Incumbent president had it not been for him already being an undemocratically appointed so-called president in 2000 by a handful of equally undemocratically appointed Supreme Court Justices and Electoral College members.
-
Can it get more stupid than this?
Jury selection is underway now complete in the case of The People of the State of New York vs. Donald J. Trump, which alleges that the defendant lied to his own check register, and lied to the general ledger of his own company, when the invoice given to him by his lawyer was paid and recorded by someone else, and that the misstatement he made to himself in his own records was done "with the intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof. "
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ny-gives-trump-anne-boleyn-treatment[/URL]
Man, maybe he should just be executed.
That local prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, is a member of the Democratic Party and the voters who elected Bragg and from whom the jury will be chosen support the Democratic Party. In 2016, the people of New York County voted 87% for Hillary Clinton and 10% for Donald Trump, and in 2020,87% for Joe Biden and 12% for Donald Trump. In other words, the jury pool is chosen from one of the most partisan jurisdictions in the country a place where almost all the judges are Democrats as well.
So the Democratic prosecutor elected in the second most Democratic county in the United States will try the former Republican president and current putative Republican Party presidential nominee before a Democrat-appointed judge and a jury drawn from a pool 87% of whom voted against him (and who are being asked if they watch Fox News or listen to talk radio in the screening process).
In other words, this is what Democrats think is fair.
Moreover, New York's statute of limitations requires that misdemeanor prosecutions be commenced within two years of the commission of the act, meaning that under the last provision, this case should never have been filed.
Gee, and you wonder why this case was filed.
For example, why does the entry in the check register or the general ledger matter at all? When would those entries, as opposed to the allegedly false invoices, be shown to anyone for any nefarious purpose? And were the entries even false? Was there any intent to fool someone to obtain something in making the entries who was the target of the allegedly false entry in private books and records? If there's no mark, no victim, then how could there be an "intent to defraud"? Defraud whom? And what is the other crime that the person making the book entry intended to commit or hide? If the other crime is not a New York crime but a federal crime, does every county prosecutor in the United States, including Alvin Bragg, have the jurisdiction to enforce an alleged federal crime indirectly through a state crime?
The answer is the New York legal system where all is fair if you are a Democrat going after a Republican.
And how about Trump's right under the 6th amendment:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Speedy trial? Impartial jury? LOL.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-news/dem-clients-of-daughter-of-judge-in-trump-trial-raised-90m-off-case/[/URL]
Two major Democratic clients of the daughter of the judge overseeing Donald Trump's hush-money trial have raised at least $93 million in campaign donations and used the case in their solicitation emails raising renewed concerns that the jurist has a major conflict of interest.
The judge's daughter, Loren Merchan, is president of Authentic Campaigns, a Chicago-based progressive political consulting firm whose top clients include Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who was the lead prosecutor in Trump's first impeachment trial, and the Senate Majority PAC, a major party fundraiser.
"Authentic Campaigns, and thus the judge's daughter, is actively making money from this sham attack against President Trump, rendering Judge Merchan conflicted out," Trump spokesman Steven Cheung told The Post, adding that evidence of bias is even clearer now than it was in August when Merchan rejected Trump's first recusal motion.
And we have the infamous words of "only 10 million illegals" rule of law soy boy saying how much Democrats were after truth, and they do not like being lied to and have so much integrity. So this judge, who has an obvious conflict of interest, recused himself from the case right?
Nah, he shoved a gag order down Trump's throat.
So here we go again. While Democrats are going to be cackling and giving themselves high fives for finding Trump guilty in this blatantly stupid and rigged case, your average American is going to see how fucking stupid this case really is and get that once again, Democrats want to cheat and win an election in a court room and not at the ballot box.
I have a feeling this trial is going to push Trump's numbers into the stratosphere.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2909491][B]"real Americans believe that voters and not Democratic juries and Democratic prosecutors should be picking who is president."[/B]
LOL. In which case it would have been a clean sweep for the Democratic candidate in every presidential election since and including 1992, thirty-two years ago, allowing for the fact that the only Repub to win slightly more votes than the Dem since then, in 2012, would never have been there to run as a Repub-initiated counterproductive quagmire Wartime Incumbent president had it not been for him already being an undemocratically appointed so-called president in 2000 by a handful of equally undemocratically appointed Supreme Court Justices and Electoral College members.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I mistyped 2012 when I meant to type 2004 for the year of the only Presidential Election since and including 1992 when the Repub candidate was the choice of the American voters to win the presidency over the Dem. Thanks solely to him and others in his administration lying to the world almost 1000 times in order to bamboozle us into two quagmire counterproductive Wars so he could run as a Wartime President.
Oh, I might as well also add here that subsequent Dem presidents eventually pulled us out of those ridiculous Repub Wars while the Repub so-called presidents did not have the balls or the patriotism to assume the political risk of actually doing it rather than just flapping their yap for years and years about someday doing it like the Repubs did.
-
No, it can't.
In fact, it isn't and can't get AS stupid as this:
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2909598][b]Can it get more stupid than this?[/b]
Jury selection is underway now complete in the case of The People of the State of New York vs. Donald J. Trump, which alleges that the defendant lied to his own check register, and lied to the general ledger of his own company, when the invoice given to him by his lawyer was paid and recorded by someone else, and that the misstatement he made to himself in his own records was done "with the intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission thereof. "
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ny-gives-trump-anne-boleyn-treatment[/URL]
Man, maybe he should just be executed.
That local prosecutor, Alvin Bragg, is a member of the Democratic Party and the voters who elected Bragg and from whom the jury will be chosen support the Democratic Party. In 2016, the people of New York County voted 87% for Hillary Clinton and 10% for Donald Trump, and in 2020,87% for Joe Biden and 12% for Donald Trump. In other words, the jury pool is chosen from one of the most partisan jurisdictions in the country a place where almost all the judges are Democrats as well.
So the Democratic prosecutor elected in the second most Democratic county in the United States will try the former Republican president and current putative Republican Party presidential nominee before a Democrat-appointed judge and a jury drawn from a pool 87% of whom voted against him (and who are being asked if they watch Fox News or listen to talk radio in the screening process).
In other words, this is what Democrats think is fair.
Moreover, New York's statute of limitations requires that misdemeanor prosecutions be commenced within two years of the commission of the act, meaning that under the last provision, this case should never have been filed.
Gee, and you wonder why this case was filed.
For example, why does the entry in the check register or the general ledger matter at all? When would those entries, as opposed to the allegedly false invoices, be shown to anyone for any nefarious purpose? And were the entries even false? Was there any intent to fool someone to obtain something in making the entries who was the target of the allegedly false entry in private books and records? If there's no mark, no victim, then how could there be an "intent to defraud"? Defraud whom? And what is the other crime that the person making the book entry intended to commit or hide? If the other crime is not a New York crime but a federal crime, does every county prosecutor in the United States, including Alvin Bragg, have the jurisdiction to enforce an alleged federal crime indirectly through a state crime?
The answer is the New York legal system where all is fair if you are a Democrat going after a Republican.
And how about Trump's right under the 6th amendment:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Speedy trial? Impartial jury? LOL.
[URL]https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-news/dem-clients-of-daughter-of-judge-in-trump-trial-raised-90m-off-case/[/URL]
Two major Democratic clients of the daughter of the judge overseeing Donald Trump's hush-money trial have raised at least $93 million in campaign donations and used the case in their solicitation emails raising renewed concerns that the jurist has a major conflict of interest.
The judge's daughter, Loren Merchan, is president of Authentic Campaigns, a Chicago-based progressive political consulting firm whose top clients include Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who was the lead prosecutor in Trump's first impeachment trial, and the Senate Majority PAC, a major party fundraiser.
"Authentic Campaigns, and thus the judge's daughter, is actively making money from this sham attack against President Trump, rendering Judge Merchan conflicted out," Trump spokesman Steven Cheung told The Post, adding that evidence of bias is even clearer now than it was in August when Merchan rejected Trump's first recusal motion.
And we have the infamous words of "only 10 million illegals" rule of law soy boy saying how much Democrats were after truth, and they do not like being lied to and have so much integrity. So this judge, who has an obvious conflict of interest, recused himself from the case right?
Nah, he shoved a gag order down Trump's throat.
So here we go again. While Democrats are going to be cackling and giving themselves high fives for finding Trump guilty in this blatantly stupid and rigged case, your average American is going to see how fucking stupid this case really is and get that once again, Democrats want to cheat and win an election in a court room and not at the ballot box.
I have a feeling this trial is going to push Trump's numbers into the stratosphere.[/QUOTE]Try this instead:
[B]Trump indictment full text: Read the court document here.
The indictment lays out 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to the former president's alleged role in hush money payments to two women during his 2016 campaign.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-indictment-full-text-read-court-document-rcna78051[/URL]
-
Lordy, Lordy there's a tape + documents galore
Will the midgets of jurisprudence wait until all the evidence, cross examination under oath and spin (closing arguments) are complete? I doubt it. But juries must. Anyone who is innocent, facing prosecution with multiple (nothing but the best) lawyers should not fear what is assumed to be a non partial jury of peers. If the mushroom doesn't fit, you must acquitt. Even David Pecker and Stephanie Clifford, called to testify know this.
-
Ha ha
Geeze. Reading these posts just make me laugh.
If Trump does not win the next election (which he will hands down) . The world is effed.
Democracy just does not exist.
You have tried every thing. Give me a break. Stormy. HA HA. Again. Gee is that the best you can do. What about Hunter. I suppose your going to say. He did nothing wrong.
You Democrats are the biggest joke I have ever seen. How can you defend yourselves. I know you will call me a racist or a aussie or a.ha again.
I can't even read these posts because Trump is that far in front of the rest of you.
There is no way the Dems can win.
-
Ha Again
Just watching crooked Hillary.
Gee.
Nothing more to say.
-
2 photos
Where? LOL
[QUOTE=Tlito;2909980]Geeze. Reading these posts just make me laugh.
If Trump does not win the next election (which he will hands down) . The world is effed.
Democracy just does not exist.
You have tried every thing. Give me a break. Stormy. HA HA. Again. Gee is that the best you can do. What about Hunter. I suppose your going to say. He did nothing wrong.
You Democrats are the biggest joke I have ever seen. How can you defend yourselves. I know you will call me a racist or a aussie or a.ha again.
I can't even read these posts because Trump is that far in front of the rest of you.
There is no way the Dems can win.[/QUOTE]Which consensus of polls shows Trump "that far in front" of Biden? Link please.
Even in the demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics consensus of Winger-selected, manipulated and timed polls, with 7 months left Trump and Biden are in a statistical tie, well within a normal +/-MoE on the head--to-head, 5-Way and in the Top Battlground States hypotheticals. Which have been improving with all the positive momentum for Biden since his terrific State of the Union Address proved everyone claiming he is feeble, cognitively impaired and can't put two words together to be blithering liars.
Uh, that would be Joe Biden by the way, not Hunter Biden. See, Joe is the President of the United States while Hunter is just the guy whose dick pics the REALLY Getting Smaller All The Time Pink Tinkle Repub Manureity House have been staring at and drooling over for the past 16 months.
Oh, and, like Donald Trump, you appear to think he is running against either Hillary Clinton, Hunter Biden, Barack Obama or gawd knows who this year.
Here is the only place Trump is far ahead of anybody; when it finally dawns on him his criminal lawyers have no more delay tactics left to throw against the wall, Trump is definitely way ahead as the first person in the courtroom most likely to drop his pants around his ankles, crow like a rooster, whip out his mushroom dick in one hand and bite the head off a live bat he had hidden in his coat pocket.
Meanwhile, the demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP President Betting Odds consensus is the most reflective of Joe Biden's upward trajectory vs Trump's fish hook decline since that Biden SOTU Address from the sites that take everything into consideration, not just the Tied poll consensus. And the most historically predictive of the group, Predictlt, shows Biden ahead of Trump by the greatest margin:
[URL]https://www.realclearpolitics.com/elections/betting-odds/2024/president/[/URL]
-
There you go again
The immortal words of Ronnie Ray Guns. Benghazi, Benghazi, Burisma, the Big Guy, Burisma! How are historical multiple criminal charges against a charlatan Ex-President a sign of strength? Inside a basket of deplorables yes, in the immortal words of Crooked Hillary. The end is definitely near. My jiffy pop popcorn is smoking in anticipation of Fat Nixon under cross examination under oath. Will he bring his self autographed Bible?
-
[QUOTE=Beijing4987;2910021]The immortal words of Ronnie Ray Guns. Benghazi, Benghazi, Burisma, the Big Guy, Burisma! How are historical multiple criminal charges against a charlatan Ex-President a sign of strength? Inside a basket of deplorables yes, in the immortal words of Crooked Hillary. The end is definitely near. My jiffy pop popcorn is smoking in anticipation of Fat Nixon under cross examination under oath. Will he bring his self autographed Bible?[/QUOTE]LOL. Someone has said it better than me.
There's no worse feeling in media than being the next guest after Stephen A. Smith. Whatever you have to say, you'll say it worse. Right, wrong, whatever, the man was born to be on television. The upside is listening to his segments. Last night, while waiting to talk about NPR, I listened as Chris Cuomo told a story about an unnamed hip-hop artist complaining that it took a rich white man like Trump being abused, for people to see the "maladministration of justice" black people have always known. What did his guest, Stephen A. Smith, think?
Stephen A. SMITH: No question. That hip hop artist who called you, he's right on the money. Here's the sad part. It gives credence to the argument Trump made during a speech weeks ago where he talked about black folks relating to him. Now, what the hell would black folks have in common with a guy that was born on third base thinking he hit a home run? Born with the proverbial spoon in his mouth? It's the legal system. I can say this because 95% of the time I voted Democrat. I'm looking at a Democratic party that looks at the black community that says, "We are there for you. We are there for you.".
But when it's time to vote, you want to talk to black people about what you're doing for them. And how you are on our side. But this man right here, who's the presumptive GOP nominee, is in a position to literally get back into the White House because what you're doing to him, we find fairly relatable to things that have been done to folks in our community, and it's happened for decades. There's no escaping that fact and Trump pointing it out, and being accurate in doing so, is perhaps the height of embarrassment for the Democratic party, in my estimation.
This exchange was preceded by a classic Stephen A-ism:
When you got four indictments and 91 counts and two impeachments and civil suits in excess of $454 million. But he still keeps marching forward, marching forward, gaining momentum. The only way to get him is to beat him, and they don't seem to be able to do that either. And I'm quite disgusted by it, to be quite honest with you.
If you watch ESPN you've heard that speech a hundred times: "You got Karl-Anthony Towns and the Stifle Tower Rudy Gobert and the high-flying new face of the league in Anthony Edwards and Naz Reid and Slo-Mo Anderson and all those boys, and you can't even beat the eighth seed in your conference one time in the regular season — one damn time, J. J. Redick! — frankly, I find that disgusting. ".
The Trump rant (click here to watch) was no sports take, nor particularly novel, as Stephen A's been branching into politics and appearing as a guest on Fox News, which can't get enough of him for obvious reasons. The hit pieces haven't come yet, but if he keeps this up, they will, and we can guess what form they'll take. It'll be ugly. But any Democrat watching should immediately recognize the red flag Stephen A. Is raising, and I don't mean the one that has to do with race. This is about sports:
Americans love sports because we have a strong egalitarian streak and love the simplicity; you play better, you win. The villain is always the overconfident favorite taken down by an underdog who wants it more. Phi Slamma Jamma dunked into infamy by Lorenzo Charles, the Greatest Show on Turf cut down by a placekicker, Miracle on Ice. That 1980 Soviet team was actually quite likable and packed with all-time greats, but they'the been trained to show no mercy in international play and piled 16 goals on poor Japan before the fateful clash. Americans love that story because the Soviets were so much better, because that's sports: you got to play the games. "If we play 'them ten times, they might win nine" — but the ice doesn't know the odds.
In every sports contest two groups of spectators are irrational and have worthless takes: the fans of the two teams playing. (This rule applies with equal or greater force to politics.) Once the homers are out of the picture, the rest of the sports-watching world argues over who will win, who should win, who deserves to win, who maybe deserves to lose. This country hates a sore loser, but a sore winner is worse. Act like you've been there! A PhD and an iron worker in the stands of a Buffalo Bills game will be equally plastered by the third quarter and react the same way if their own team chooses to run up the score, especially against an opponent they might see in the playoffs. They'll stare at each other in glassy-eyed panic, each knowing: "That will come back to haunt us. ".
Every sports fan — rich, poor, black, white, old, young — is steeped in these intricacies. We know why "ball don't lie," and why coaches who whine about injuries deserve to lose ("Next man up" is the rule). Stephen A. May not be the spokesperson of "the black community," but he might be Chief Justice of sports talk. Democrats should hear what he's saying: to the average person, these interminable Trump indictments and lawsuits and lawfare (hearing a popular sportscaster use that term unironically should inspire a Beltway mass-clench) seem worse than cheating. It comes off as cowardice, fear of even competition, something that never, ever plays in this country. "The only way to get him is to beat him, and they don't seem to be able to do that," is a heavy indictment, and if he's thinking that, you can bet a hell of a lot lot more people are. Just win, baby. What happened to that?
-
Smith sounds like a total numbskull
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2910068]LOL. Someone has said it better than me.
There's no worse feeling in media than being the next guest after Stephen A. Smith. Whatever you have to say, you'll say it worse. Right, wrong, whatever, the man was born to be on television. The upside is listening to his segments. Last night, while waiting to talk about NPR, I listened as Chris Cuomo told a story about an unnamed hip-hop artist complaining that it took a rich white man like Trump being abused, for people to see the "maladministration of justice" black people have always known. What did his guest, Stephen A. Smith, think?
Stephen A. SMITH: No question. That hip hop artist who called you, he's right on the money. Here's the sad part. It gives credence to the argument Trump made during a speech weeks ago where he talked about black folks relating to him. Now, what the hell would black folks have in common with a guy that was born on third base thinking he hit a home run? Born with the proverbial spoon in his mouth? It's the legal system. I can say this because 95% of the time I voted Democrat. I'm looking at a Democratic party that looks at the black community that says, "We are there for you. We are there for you.".
But when it's time to vote, you want to talk to black people about what you're doing for them. And how you are on our side. But this man right here, who's the presumptive GOP nominee, is in a position to literally get back into the White House because what you're doing to him, we find fairly relatable to things that have been done to folks in our community, and it's happened for decades. There's no escaping that fact and Trump pointing it out, and being accurate in doing so, is perhaps the height of embarrassment for the Democratic party, in my estimation.
This exchange was preceded by a classic Stephen A-ism:
When you got four indictments and 91 counts and two impeachments and civil suits in excess of $454 million. But he still keeps marching forward, marching forward, gaining momentum. The only way to get him is to beat him, and they don't seem to be able to do that either. And I'm quite disgusted by it, to be quite honest with you.
If you watch ESPN you've heard that speech a hundred times: "You got Karl-Anthony Towns and the Stifle Tower Rudy Gobert and the high-flying new face of the league in Anthony Edwards and Naz Reid and Slo-Mo Anderson and all those boys, and you can't even beat the eighth seed in your conference one time in the regular season one damn time, J. J. Redick! frankly, I find that disgusting. ".
The Trump rant (click here to watch) was no sports take, nor particularly novel, as Stephen A's been branching into politics and appearing as a guest on Fox News, which can't get enough of him for obvious reasons. The hit pieces haven't come yet, but if he keeps this up, they will, and we can guess what form they'll take. It'll be ugly. But any Democrat watching should immediately recognize the red flag Stephen A. Is raising, and I don't mean the one that has to do with race. This is about sports:
Americans love sports because we have a strong egalitarian streak and love the simplicity; you play better, you win. The villain is always the overconfident favorite taken down by an underdog who wants it more. Phi Slamma Jamma dunked into infamy by Lorenzo Charles, the Greatest Show on Turf cut down by a placekicker, Miracle on Ice. That 1980 Soviet team was actually quite likable and packed with all-time greats, but they'the been trained to show no mercy in international play and piled 16 goals on poor Japan before the fateful clash. Americans love that story because the Soviets were so much better, because that's sports: you got to play the games. "If we play 'them ten times, they might win nine" but the ice doesn't know the odds.
In every sports contest two groups of spectators are irrational and have worthless takes: the fans of the two teams playing. (This rule applies with equal or greater force to politics.) Once the homers are out of the picture, the rest of the sports-watching world argues over who will win, who should win, who deserves to win, who maybe deserves to lose. This country hates a sore loser, but a sore winner is worse. Act like you've been there! A PhD and an iron worker in the stands of a Buffalo Bills game will be equally plastered by the third quarter and react the same way if their own team chooses to run up the score, especially against an opponent they might see in the playoffs. They'll stare at each other in glassy-eyed panic, each knowing: "That will come back to haunt us. ".
Every sports fan rich, poor, black, white, old, young is steeped in these intricacies. We know why "ball don't lie," and why coaches who whine about injuries deserve to lose ("Next man up" is the rule). Stephen A. May not be the spokesperson of "the black community," but he might be Chief Justice of sports talk. Democrats should hear what he's saying: to the average person, these interminable Trump indictments and lawsuits and lawfare (hearing a popular sportscaster use that term unironically should inspire a Beltway mass-clench) seem worse than cheating. It comes off as cowardice, fear of even competition, something that never, ever plays in this country. "The only way to get him is to beat him, and they don't seem to be able to do that," is a heavy indictment, and if he's thinking that, you can bet a hell of a lot lot more people are. Just win, baby. What happened to that?[/QUOTE]Trump "keeps marching forward gaining momentum" where again? Joe Biden is the one gaining momentum in the polls, not Trump.
Oh, of course, it is clear as day why the man who is more responsible for converting a likely manageable endemic confined to one region in China into the Pandemic it became than any other person on the planet, disproportionately killing Black people and other minorities due to the types of close proximity jobs they held and living conditions would be seen as a hero to the Black demo to a numbskull like Smith rather than the man who was chosen by the first AfricanAmerican President of the United States to be his Vice President, was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom With Distinction by him, who himself chose the first Black / South Asian person to be his Vice President, who nominated and got appointed the first Black woman on the Supreme Court, whose economic and national security policies and stewardship recovered America from the historic Disasters of Trump's Pandemic better than any other country on Earth and who has now twice driven the Black unemployment rate to record lows, once in the Obama-Biden Administration and once in the Biden-Harris administration.
It must be because the thoroughly documented evidence shows Trump lied about the size of his properties by THREE TIMES in order to get favorable loan terms that other, more truthful borrowers were denied.
You know, the same kind of unfair charges Black people and other minorities in Manhattan get busted for all the time. LOL.
What a clueless numbskull.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2909668]
The indictment lays out 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to the former president's alleged role in hush money payments to two women during his 2016 campaign.
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-indictment-full-text-read-court-document-rcna78051[/URL][/QUOTE]34 pages of orange man bad? OMG No! Like we have not heard that before. The attorney prosecuting this case has total immunity and can say whatever the fuck he wants. He CAMPAIGNED saying he was going to get Trump. The judge's family is getting rich off this farce of a trial and we just heard a potential juror, who was not disqualified, talk trash about Trump. The whole thing is a fucking joke. Like I said, they should just find Trump guilty now.
The funny part will be when we see you douches doing high fives when the guilty verdict comes in when the reality is that this has all the suspense of a Soviet election. Hell, a Soviet election may have been more fair.
-
Our resident Trump apologist, will pay Trump to live in his head?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;909461]Hey, those 10 million illegals cross the border, and you are totally down with that. Yeah, two Democratic douches found Trump guilty of a victimless act right before the election in an effort to rig it, and it just happened to be in the year of an election. That was a shocker! ... [/QUOTE]
(...kkkk!) Dude, all of your 20 million immigration guesstimate, nonsense and bullshit was already debunked here (below) and in other recent posts (in the last several days). But don't let that stop you from whining and droning on, [i][b]as Russia's most "useful idiot".[/b][/i]
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2909007]Bring in? 20 millions? Here's Elvis again in all his splendor.
"Nearly 10 million migrants attempted to enter the US between October 2019 and January 2024, with record-high border apprehensions in 2022. ".
[URL]https://usafacts.org/articles/what-can-the-data-tell-us-about-unauthorized-immigration/[/URL]
Of course, "attempting to enter" doesn't equate to entering, but why focus on the details when you have a cool round number![/QUOTE]
Elvis 2008, since we all know Trump "lives" in his own head (and yours too apparently), is it any wonder that as our newly minted resident Trump apologist, would point to everyone else, but the chief-n-liar, pussy-grabber, grifter, fascist wannabe dictator, 2x impeached, 4x indicted on 88 criminal felony counts...for his criminal legal problems, as anyone but his own doing, in a desperate plea for his gullible cult to come to the aid of their "Savior".
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;909461] Ah yes, soy boy, your fat flimsy tower of "integrity" is okay with using the law to punish someone breaking the law as long as it helps you.[/QUOTE]
Trump has been in-and-out of court more times than you can count. The dude, is probably the most fake, pompous, supercilious, self-aggrandizing charlatan and litigious wimp ever to set foot in US Courts history.
It's only because, just recently he's really and truly been held "ACCOUNTABLE" for his criminal, defamation and sociopath behavior. For him this is eerie uncharted territory and the dude is scared and acting like a "b-i-t-c-h". And here you are throwing shade on the criminal justice system for criminal shit Trump did to himself and all those other "useful idiots" he's managed to bamboozle.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;909461]"I am Spidy. I have integrity. I know all the facts. " You are so full of it Soy Boy. ... [/QUOTE] Interesting statement, coming from the misogynist INCEL, that obviously must have me confused with his grifter, charlatan snake-oil salesman Trump, that is currently [b]"living rent free in your head"[/b] and is the "real fat-ass McCoy", that is so full of it.
As it was Trump, the serial litigious clown, who recently claimed, he knows the court system better than anyone and yet didn't know each side is limited to 10 jury strikes. Somehow his dumbass bloviated ego thought, he should be entitled an unlimited number of strikes...kkkk!
[b]Trump slams number of strikes allowed against jurors in hush money trail[/b]
[URL]https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4599654-trump-slams-number-strikes-allowed-against-jurors-hush-money-trial[/URL]
And Here:
[b]Everything Trump says he knows "more about than anybody" - Axios[/b]
[URL]https://www.axios.com/2019/01/05/everything-trump-says-he-knows-more-about-than-anybody[/URL]
BTW, speaking of INTEGRITY, when are you going to start one of your infamous nonsensical rants about the injustice exhibited by right-wing SC Justice Thomas, failure not recuse himself from cases, that clearly involve his insurrectionist wife?
[b]PS: [/b]Elvis 2008, you can expect a call from the Trump campaign, anytime now, demanding a 5% for cut or 5% royalty, for [b]Trump's "likeness"[/b] living in your head...kkkk!
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/17/trump-campaign-fundraising-five-percent-00152830[/URL]
-
Where does one's winger bullshit end and the MSM bullshit begin?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2909598][b]Can it get more stupid than this?[/b]
Jury selection is underway now complete in the case of The People of the State of New York vs. Donald J. Trump, . . .
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ny-gives-trump-anne-boleyn-treatment
Man, maybe he should just be executed.
. . .
[/QUOTE]Uhh! What now?
BTW, between all your lazy-ass bullshit [u]"cut-and-paste"[/u] news articles and what is actually your own bullshit is so blurred in your posts as of late, it's starting to look like, one big pile of right-wing Russian propaganda BS nonsense.
Just [u]NO CLEAR delineation[/u], as to what is [B]MSM bullshit[/B] and what is [B]angry Elvis 2008[/B], INCEL he-Man Women Hater's bullshit!
Almost very reminiscent of the lazy, incoherent, disjointed [b]"cut-and-paste"[/b] porridge and goulash, that your brother winger, MarquisdeSade1 (MDS1) liked to post. (...kkkk!)
Just saying...you can do better! Or NOT!
[b]P.S.: [/b]Again, just saying...it would be nice to know, who said what and [B]"who's bullshit",[/B] I'm commenting on!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2910099](...kkkk!) Dude, all of your 20 million immigration guesstimate, nonsense and bullshit was already debunked here (below) and in other recent posts (in the last several days). But don't let that stop you from whining and droning on, [i][b]as Russia's most "useful idiot".[/b][/i][/QUOTE]And again with the Russiagate crap "only 10 million illegals" Soy Boy? You douches still think that happened, still think Hunter snorting coke, screwing hookers and underage women was "nothing wrong" and classic Russian disinformation. You still think Covid came from nature and not a lab in China. And now you are back at it again selling the bullshit lie of this "impartial" jury, judge, and prosecutor.
As a nurse infamously said, we cannot treat stupid but we can sedate it. We need to be handing out crates of Valium to you Democratic douches.
-
Of course, that is just one of his felony indictments
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2910095]34 pages of orange man bad? OMG No! Like we have not heard that before. The attorney prosecuting this case has total immunity and can say whatever the fuck he wants. He CAMPAIGNED saying he was going to get Trump. The judge's family is getting rich off this farce of a trial and we just heard a potential juror, who was not disqualified, talk trash about Trump. The whole thing is a fucking joke. Like I said, they should just find Trump guilty now.
The funny part will be when we see you douches doing high fives when the guilty verdict comes in when the reality is that this has all the suspense of a Soviet election. Hell, a Soviet election may have been more fair.[/QUOTE]Yes, I am amazed that anyone could keep the significant details of any one of Trump's felony crimes down to 34 pages too. But, as Trump's Puppet Master Putin well knows, time is of the essence here. So it is worth it to keep some of these Trump indictments as trim as possible without skipping the major points.
But don't worry so much about a conviction. First of all, you know better than anyone either a conviction or a hung jury / not guilty verdict for any of Trump's various crimes will thrill and delight Trump's voters every bit as much as an acquittal or my prediction of what he will do when it dawns on him his lawyers have no more delay tactics left to throw at the wall. You know, that someone will wake him up just in time for him to drop his pants in the courtroom, whip out his mushroom dick, crow like a rooster and bite the head off a live bat thingy.
And on a conviction, a verdict of guilty on any of those various felonies? Well, it only takes one Trumpster liar to weasel, wiggle and lie his / her way onto the jury to make sure that happens. And there are at least 74,223,970 America-hating, anti Law and Order-Rule of Law Trumpster Liars out there eager and happy to do it. Chances are very, very good at least one will wind up on each of those juries.
-
The real lived "American Black Experience"...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2910068]LOL. Someone has said it better than me.
There's no worse feeling in media than being the next guest after Stephen A. Smith. ... it took a rich white man like Trump being abused, for people to see the "maladministration of justice" black people have always known. What did his guest, Stephen A. Smith, think? ...[/QUOTE]
(....kkkk!) If SAS, as you're delusionally suggesting, is equating, the multiple 91 felony charges and the trials and tribulations of one Donald J. Trump, as identifying with the persecution of black people (or other people of color) throughout history, by LE and the criminal justice system...then I'm sure he'd want Trump to experience [b]the [u]full[/u] IMMERSIVE BLACK experience[/b] of said injustice, while on trial.
We're only at the jury vetting and voir dire stage. Let's not get ahead of ourselves!
While Trump has experienced the polite and courteous harassment of the FBI, I think [b]he skipped past[/b] the disproportionately heavy-handed police brutality, police beating and a healthy amount of racist threats and barbs, that are afforded to blacks (and people of color) while in custody.
The constant harassment, driving while black (particularly in a nice car), or blatant over-ticketing of police officers (especially in the south) on people of color, to fund their police department funding shortfall. Or the middle of the night no-knock-warrants, shoot-first ask question later, deaths/murders. Or the disproportionate denial or commensurate bail, proportional to one's means of income or social standing.
BTW, this should including jail time, in a very nasty prison, should he be found guilty, if he's to truly immerse himself in the "black experience".
So yes...lets not skip the [b]"good stuff"[/b], that is so very much, an integral part, to the [b]actual lived "black experience"[/b] and somehow think for a moment, SAS, is truly equating Trump's current predicament, to the REAL lived "black experience" w/r to treatment by LE and the US criminal justice system.
[LIST]Here SAS, talks about the REAL "black experience", given to black, brown and minority people of color, by the [b]"GOON SQUAD"[/b], a Mississippi police, LE and the criminal justice system:
[QUOTE=Stephen A. Smith] Six police officers sentenced to long jail terms, in the terrorizing and torture of two black men (in Jan 24th, 2023), when the officers kick in the door without a warrant and assaulted the black man (Jenkins and Parker) [b]with stun guns and "a sex toy".[/b]
The fmr. officers, that committed the offense, because [u]a white neighbor reported[/u], that Jenkins and Parker, [u]where staying in the home, with a white woman.[/u] Sentencing ranged from 40 yrs to 10 yrs.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha8Ly3r3TuE[/URL][/QUOTE][/LIST]I really wonder, if this "GOON SQUAD" example, is the immersive "black experience" and treatment, you think SAS, had in mind, that represents the "unfair treatment" Trump is now getting, somehow equates to the REAL lived "black experience"?
Yeah, I'd really love to see Trump, live as much as 5% of the real lived "black experience" w/r to LE and the US criminal justice system.
-
Booked & out in minutes and the T shirt and poster mug shot
Abused? Orange Jesus arrived to his arraignments in a motorcade, protected by America's elite police force, was not subject to a strip & cavity search or days, weeks or months awaiting trial. He was not cornered in a dingy New York stairwell, sodomized with a cops nightstick or killed in a hail of bullets. No. This prince, born with a silver spoon in his mouth was indicted by grand juries that were presented evidence of a crime. He paid for a full page advertisement in the New York Times, calling for the death penalty for young black men, later exonerated. The pussy grabber is getting his day in courts. So unfair!
-
Take the win, already....
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2910068] There's no worse feeling in media than being the next guest after Stephen A. Smith. ...
When you got four indictments and 91 counts and two impeachments and civil suits in excess of $454 million. But he still keeps marching forward, marching forward, gaining momentum. The only way to get him is to beat him, and they don't seem to be able to do that either. And I'm quite disgusted by it, to be quite honest with you.[/QUOTE]
On the one hand you wingers and SAS, are crowing about he shouldn't be on trial, because its a bogus case. But yet can't help yourselves, crowing about how this will ONLY help Trump's numbers. So isn't that a win for you wingers?
It would be unprecedented, much like the Jan 6th Capitol insurrection mob/riot attack, but Trump could still govern from jail, since it's not like he spent a great deal time doing actual real work in the White House, during his 1st term, anyways. (...kkkk!)
[b]Stop complaining and take the win![/b] Especially, if Trump and you Trumpsters, truly believes this will somehow help him, bolster his numbers, "connect" with his voters of color, and gives him the "street creed", he so desperately wants.
Just be glad, that if LE and the US criminal justice system, really wanted to [i]"make America great again"[/i] and take Trump back to the good ole days, so he could [u]truly immerse himself[/u] in the "American Black Experience" (ABE), shall we say [i][b]back to 1864[/b][/i], like Repubs across the country and in Arizona's have done, with some of the most arcane and backwards-ass abortion laws from 1800's, what would that look like?
So given his orchestrated Jan 6th coup/insurrection and 91 (??) felony charges, would that mean, in 1864, for Trump to be immersed in the "American Black Experience", he...:[LIST] Would be on trial for a hanging, by now, given the black experience of 1864?
- Or worse, would, he have been given the chance, to even make it to trial?
- Or would it simply have been trial by hanging?
- Or would he even have been given "a fair trial" at all (assuming he makes it to trial in 1864), if you're immersed in the "black experience" of 1864?[/LIST]So I doubt very much, anyone of reasonable logic, a mountain of evidence, and pages and pages of documents and witnesses of Trump criminal transgressions, thinks for a second, that what a quasi white, orange quasi billionaire, ex-TV star, ex-President like Trump, is currently going through, [b]is anything like being immersed in "the black experience",[/b] when black and brown people are deal with the LE and US criminal justice system, in real life.
No one is above the law! NOT EVEN "mushroom dick" Trump! Do the crime, do the time!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2910190]So I doubt very much, anyone of reasonable logic, thinks for a second, that what a quasi white, orange quasi billionaire, ex-TV star, ex-President like Trump, is currently going through, is anything like being immersed in "the black experience"[/QUOTE]LOL. God, I see this so much with you douches. You do not work with black people or have any black friends and you go on about the black plight. In fact, you are so into "the black experience / plight" you do not even listen to black people. Steven A smith does not have reasonable logic? The black rapper does not have reasonable logic? The poll numbers show Trump's popularity among black men is going up, and you say all these men do not have reasonable logic? LOL. You are literally not listening to what these black men are saying and feeling. Hell, you could not be more racist if you tried Soy Boy.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2910190]Stop complaining and take the win! Especially, if Trump and you Trumpsters, truly believes this will somehow help him, bolster his numbers, "connect" with his voters of color, and gives him the "street creed", he so desperately wants.[/QUOTE]You completely miss that I and a lot of black people care more about having a just legal system than who becomes president, but you do not. All you care about is your guy wins so those checks keep coming your way.
Isn't that what was told to blacks? Quit complaining about an unjust legal system? Look at how free you are now compared to where you were? Your degree of racial insensitivity is astounding.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2910190]No one is above the law![/QUOTE]If that were true, Obama would be in jail for murdering an American without a trial. A president has immunity from legal prosecution if his actions are associated with being president. In this case, Trump was charged with something he did illegally while president and acting in capacity as president.
As for being above the law, there is Hiliary, Hunter Biden, and Joe Biden breaking the law.
And then there are people who possess marijuana in New York. They are above the law.
And those not paying for public transportation.
And trespassing outside of stalking.
And prostitutes.
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/06/us/alvin-bragg-manhattan-district-attorney-crimes-prosecution/index.html[/URL]
Among the crimes Bragg said his office would not prosecute: marijuana misdemeanors, including selling more than three ounces; not paying public transportation fare; trespassing except a fourth degree stalking charge, resisting arrest, obstructing governmental administration in certain cases, and prostitution.
And the 10 million illegals who entered the country under Biden.
And the other 10+ million who were already here.
They are catching undercover Liberal Activists lying to the Judge in order to get on the Trump Jury Trump posted on Truth Social, giving credit to Fox News host Jesse Watters for the quote. If this is true, I guarantee you Alvin Bragg is not going to prosecute any perjury committing liberal activist.
Here is all of what Jessie Water said: They are catching undercover liberal activists lying to the judge. They're saying, oh, have you ever seen anything on social media about Donald Trump? No, I can't remember. Well, what about this post where you said he should be in prison? Oh yeah. That one strike and and they keep throwing these undercovers at them and thank God they're doing the research on these people so far. The jury foreman is a guy born in Ireland. Er. And then my other hope is a guy born in Puerto Rico with grandkids. The rest of them are corporate lawyers with dye all over their firms websites. And you have a 20 year old white girl who works for Disney and likes to dance. This looks like trouble. I think I think I hung jury. I think a hung jury is the best you're going to get here.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2910190]We're only at the jury vetting and voir dire stage. Let's not get ahead of ourselves![/QUOTE]So besides the compromised judge's family making bank on the case, the corrupt prosecutor who campaigned for getting Trump, the lying liberal activists trying to get on the jury, and you still think the fix is not in? LOL.
Hey, Spidy, why does Trump have a gag order in place if things are so fair?
-
Repub SCUMBAGS in the House...get the RAID!!!
Rep. Tony Gonzalez (R-TX), drops a bombshell of a comment and call outs the dysfunctional Repub House members, that he has to work with, saying, [i][b]"...I serve with some REAL SCUMBAGS"[/i][/b]
[b]House Republican Blasts Far-Right 'Scumbags' Amid Fight[/b]
[URL]https://www.huffpost.com/entry/house-republican-tony-gonzales-scumbags-mike-johnson_n_66255bffe4b0167f7bf565c2[/URL]
Couldn't Agree with you more Tony! Yes, far right-wing [i]"Repub SCUMBAGS"[/i], are unfortunately EVERYWHERE! (...kkkk!)
Where did all the "moderate" and "normie" Repubs go? Would that be out the House door, with the middle finger held high? (...kkkk!)
-
SAS, Rapers and Neo-Nazi SCUMBAGS?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2910218]LOL. God, I see this so much with you douches. You do not work with black people or have any black friends and you go on about the black plight. In fact, you are so into "the black experience / plight" you do not even listen to black people. Steven A smith does not have reasonable logic? The black rapper does not have reasonable logic? The poll numbers show Trump's popularity among black men is going up, and you say all these men do not have reasonable logic? LOL. You are literally not listening to what these black men are saying and feeling. Hell, you could not be more racist if you tried Soy Boy. ... [/QUOTE]
(....kkkk!) Show me the choirs of black people, both black men and black women that think Trump shouldn't be on trial and maybe I'll sit-up and take notice. You present the two black men (who may have a voice in the black community), but don't speak for the entire community. So two black men don't like the Hush-Money Case against Trump...[b]Big Whoop![/b]
BTW, SAS says, 95% of the time he votes for Dems. Was he (or the rapper) asked who they'll vote for this time?
SAS and this rapper, are not the first black (brown or white) people, that think, it's a bogus case against Trump and they won't be the last...[b]Big Whoop![/b] For every SAS or black rapper, there are 100 black scholars, lawyers, leaders, preachers, teachers ...etc that probably say otherwise.
Yeah, this is all well and good in the [i]"court of public opinion"[/i] and panders to the docile FOXY Muse "useful idiots", but none of these people work for DOJ, whose job it is to look at the facts, evidence and burden of proof to determine if they have a viable case. [u]So it's a moot point[/u], as Trump will stand trial for his crimes!
So, instead of acting like, a jail-cell [b]"b-i-t-c-h"[/b], just like everybody else, [b]citizen Trump,[/b] will have his day in court to prove his innocence.
[b]BTW, why didn't you provide the link[/b], URL, website or source, where you got the SAS interview, so we could decide for ourselves (if we wish, as to), what was said in totality? Afraid your bullshit won't stand up to scrutiny?
Hey, you may be right and the "polls" do show a raise in black voters, for Trump...[b]Big Whoop![/b]. Just how much of a raise?
Biden and the Dems, have the most consistent non-White voting base, in Black voters. Biden, will have the known historically high numbers of between 82% to 86%, majority of Black voters, come election day actually voting for him. Verses the lip service as to what some bias poll says, about how Black voters are "raising" for Trump. Historically Repubs get 10% to 12%...[b]Big Whoop![/b] I doubt very much, that a racist fmr. president in Trump, will push any significant number of Black voters to vote for him, to make a significant difference come election day.
So Elvis 2008, if Trump really does have the "raising" Black vote, then explain to me, why is it that Trump and Repubs are suppressing the black votes, on voter lists, disproportionately removing drop-boxes and ballot-boxes, primarily in black neighborhoods, in swing states, and calling out ONLY black and brown neighborhoods for voter fraud?
The only polls that REALLY interest me, is the one come election day/week. As the polls haven't exactly gotten much correct, thus far, in 2022, 2023 or 2024 primaries and special elections. Where the Dem have WON over and over again...with BIG TIME WINS! So if polls are true to form, they'll have gotten the black vote wrong too, no doubt due to the abortion ban "blind-spot" that will cripple the Repubs.
I would worry more about voters, rejecting the Neo-Nazis ("with white hoods in the daytime") members that have infiltrated Republican Party, that Rep. Tony Gonzalez (R-TX) says are SCUMBAGS. No doubt, a whooping big loss of White, Black, Latin, Asian and Native Indian voters there, for Trump. Yeah, very problematic for Repubs!
Okay, so Biden loses the votes of SAS and a few rappers...[b]Big Whoop![/b] Meanwhile Trump loses, [u]hundreds of thousands of votes[/u] due to the Neo-Nazis SCUMBAG problem that Republicans have. [b]Yikes...that's gotta hurt!![/b] Sure looks like acceptable losses, on both sides to me, given both scenarios.
So Biden WINS Again!!!!...Considering I don't know many Americans, that are willingly open to endorsing Neo-Nazis SCUM-BAGS (save a few Repubs, as it would seem).
However, I can't speak for Elvis 2008, as he's the reigning king of the "D-BAGS" word usage, so he may indeed know a few "SCUM-BAGS"! (...kkkk!)
-
The Height of Hilarious Repub Hypocrisy
[QUOTE=Beijing4987;2910021]The immortal words of Ronnie Ray Guns. Benghazi, Benghazi, Burisma, the Big Guy, Burisma! How are historical multiple criminal charges against a charlatan Ex-President a sign of strength? Inside a basket of deplorables yes, in the immortal words of Crooked Hillary. The end is definitely near. My jiffy pop popcorn is smoking in anticipation of Fat Nixon under cross examination under oath. Will he bring his self autographed Bible?[/QUOTE]How hilarious is it that the cult followers of the Repub candidate whose central campaign pillar in 2016 was "Lock her up"! LOL, today now conjuring up every teeny tiny insignificsnt detail and loophole they hope to their Lord and Savior God will miraculously erase the overwhelming and fully documented evidence of their cult leader's guilt on 88 Felonies, many of which are directly related to his attempt to overturn a free and fair election, interfere with a free and fair election, overthrow American democracy and shit on the USA Constitution. Lolol.
And that was after she had the balls and the facts on her side to sit for hours and hours and hours to personally testify under Oath before a tribunal of political enemies, while even the Repub lackey head of the FBI who practically handed Trump the Electoral College awards vs the millions more actual votes Clinton got AND the most hypocritical Trump Cult Follower Attorney Generals, appointed by Trump himself, could not cite one even lame excuse to indict her OR Obama OR Biden for anything!
BTW, what was Liz Cheney's, MittWitt Romney's, et al publicly stated position on that Repub Party Presidential Candidate's central campaign pillar back in 2016 before they happily and eagerly voted for him anyway? Lolol.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2910365](....kkkk!) Show me the choirs of black people, both black men and black women that think Trump shouldn't be on trial and maybe I'll sit-up and take notice. You present the two black men (who may have a voice in the black community), but don't speak for the entire community.[/QUOTE]LOL. So you do not know any black people but pretend to identify with their plight? OMG, you are just what I described. Hell, you were probably racist as could be when you were younger.
Two black men? [URL]https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/18/why-are-black-voters-backing-donald-trump-in-record-numbers[/URL].
The Black voting bloc is unique in the US. Currently, it is the only group of voters which has consistently identified with the Democrat Party reaching 77 percent of Black voters in favour of Democrats in 2020. By comparison, 42 percent of white voters and 63 percent of Latino voters identify as Democrats. Now, however, only 63 percent of Black voters an all-time low since GenForward started collecting data in 1999 say they will support Biden this year, according to the survey.
Historically, the Democratic Party's legacy with the Civil Rights Movement is what kept it popular with Black voters. However, younger Black voters do not have those same civil rights legacy attachments.
End of link.
For the record, Steven A Smith has blasted the Democratic lawfare tactics but is not all in on Trump. SAS does not care for Trump's immature antics and is undecided which just shows again you are not listening to blacks. You are just putting out crap you think that they want to hear.
And what you do not get about SAS is that he has the old white man's ear unlike any other black man I know. While you and other Democratic douches are looking down your noses at them, SAS is friends with Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and Chris Mad Dog Russo. He socializes with these men and has their respect and instead of blasting corporate America has learned to understand where they are coming from. He is not just huge in the sports world but acts on the popular soap opera General Hospital. You are clueless to his reach, and your response to what he said? Oh, he is just one voice. LOL.
If SAS advocated a case for Trump, given how articulate he is, it would be repeated time and again throughout society, but it would be even bigger in the black community. You see if you listened to SAS, he will tell you that in his family, there were VERY conservative family values.
What he just did was launch a warning shot across the bow. "Come on, why'all, win the election at the ballot box and not in court, we blacks know how rigged the court system is. ".
And have you listened? Hell no. You dumb Democratic douches keep cheering on the legal system and insisting how fair it is. Keep not listening to him and he will articulate a position for Trump and against Biden, and if he does that, the Dems do not have a prayer of winning. The loss of the black vote will go from a trickle to a landslide.
-
Of course, it makes total sense that Black men relate to Trump re The Courts. LOL
This was 2 years ago and Trump is till not in jail:
[B]Donald Trump were Black, he'd be in jail already.
If you're Black in America, it's almost too easy to go to jail. Trump's whiteness protects him.
July 29, 2022[/B]
[URL]https://www.salon.com/2022/07/29/if-donald-were-black-hed-be-in-jail-already/[/URL]
And please please please don't anyone educate that clueless numbskull Stephen A. Smith about the historical reality of Trump and Blacks because then he might inadvertently blurt it out on Fux News, lose that recurring gig and, worse, might actually contribute to the education of several million young Black men somewhere along the way as well!
[B]Did Donald Trump ever apologize to the Central Park Five?[/B]
[URL]https://www.politifact.com/article/2023/jul/25/did-donald-trump-ever-apologize-central/[/URL]
[QUOTE]In 1989, as New York City was reeling from the Central Park Five case in which a woman in Central Park was raped and beaten, Donald Trump took out an ad calling for the reimposition of the states death penalty.
Two decades later, the five men were exonerated based in part on DNA evidence. One, Yusef Salaam, won a primary earlier this year for a seat on New Yorks city council.
Despite the exoneration, Trump on at least five occasions has expressed that he continues to believe the original verdict that the men were guilty and that a settlement made by the city was a mistake.[/QUOTE][B]'Not Wanted': Black Applicants Rejected for Trump Housing Speak Out.
Litigation sparked by discrimination allegations stretched into the mid-1980s.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/not-wanted-black-applicants-rejected-trump-housing-speak-out-n671966[/URL]
[QUOTE]Her case also became part of a federal racial discrimination lawsuit filed by the Justice Department against Donald and Fred Trump that was resolved with a consent decree two years later in which they agreed to terms aimed at preventing discrimination.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2910521]
And please please please don't anyone educate that clueless numbskull Stephen A. Smith about the historical reality of Trump and Blacks because then he might inadvertently blurt it out on Fux News, lose that recurring gig and, worse, might actually contribute to the education of several million young Black men somewhere along the way as well![/QUOTE]LOL. It is a good thing you are in Thailand and no Democratic candidate is listening to you. In 2016, you had Michael Moore waving the yellow flag to Democrats and said, "Hey, this guy Trump is really, really appealing to blue collar people in the Midwest. " and he was ignored. Now you have Steven A. Smith doing the same with black folks and the reaction is the same.
In your case, it is oh "he is a numbskull". Oh, okay. I Thailand Tooms know more about blacks and Trump than SAS ever could. When Matt Taibbi said in his article that you never want to follow SAS on television because no matter what you say, SAS will be more articulate than you are he was serious. And SAS is a guy who grew up poor in New York, had an abusive father but a loving mother, a big family that originated in St. Thomas and Antigua, and went to a HBCU (historically black college and university). This is a guy who when he does a show from the HBCUs thousands show up. He is up to speed on most issues of the day and literally has friends in every demographic.
SAS says he has voted Democrat 95% of the time, and his only vote for a Republicans was Chris Christie. He also said he would vote for Nikki Haley over Biden but is undecided on Trump. This "numbskull" has the charisma of Barrack Obama but is even more persuasive than Obama ever was. If he made the case for blacks to vote for Trump, the case would be repeated again and again in the black community and Trump would have it in the bag.
As of now, he is wisely saying he does not know enough to make the case for Trump but unlike you Thailand Tooms, who is the numbskull, SAS is listening to the arguments being made for Trump.
But I do hope you dumb Democratic douches keep calling him names and implying he is stupid because that would move him to the Trump side faster than anything else.
-
So SAS just doesn't know enough about Trump yet?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2910553]LOL. It is a good thing you are in Thailand and no Democratic candidate is listening to you. In 2016, you had Michael Moore waving the yellow flag to Democrats and said, "Hey, this guy Trump is really, really appealing to blue collar people in the Midwest. " and he was ignored. Now you have Steven A. Smith doing the same with black folks and the reaction is the same.
In your case, it is oh "he is a numbskull". Oh, okay. I Thailand Tooms know more about blacks and Trump than SAS ever could. When Matt Taibbi said in his article that you never want to follow SAS on television because no matter what you say, SAS will be more articulate than you are he was serious. And SAS is a guy who grew up poor in New York, had an abusive father but a loving mother, a big family that originated in St. Thomas and Antigua, and went to a HBCU (historically black college and university). This is a guy who when he does a show from the HBCUs thousands show up. He is up to speed on most issues of the day and literally has friends in every demographic.
SAS says he has voted Democrat 95% of the time, and his only vote for a Republicans was Chris Christie. He also said he would vote for Nikki Haley over Biden but is undecided on Trump. This "numbskull" has the charisma of Barrack Obama but is even more persuasive than Obama ever was. If he made the case for blacks to vote for Trump, the case would be repeated again and again in the black community and Trump would have it in the bag.
As of now, he is wisely saying he does not know enough to make the case for Trump but unlike you Thailand Tooms, who is the numbskull, SAS is listening to the arguments being made for Trump.
But I do hope you dumb Democratic douches keep calling him names and implying he is stupid because that would move him to the Trump side faster than anything else.[/QUOTE]Well, that is exactly how and why much better informed voters like me can help clueless numbskulls like SAS. And I have to assume you didn't know those rudimentary facts about Trump either. But now you do.
Here is what I know about Black Americans that SAS apparently does not know; if he and they "knew enough about Trump" he could not make a case for Trump at all, as could no one else of any ethnicity.
Yet he flaps his yap about the oh so simpatico brotherly love connection between Donald Trump and Black men on his sweet recurring Fux News gig. Pretty much the definition of a clueless numbskull.
It's too bad SAS is such a clueless numbskull that he has not bothered to "know enough" about Trump on the most rudimentary factors to finally tell everyone seeing and hearing him on his sweet recurring Fux News gig that they would also be clueless numbskulls to neglect to vote or to vote for anyone except Biden and every other Dem on their ballot in order to keep Trump and Trump Cult Followers' Repub Trumpism as far away from the levers of USA government as possible now and far into the foreseeable future.
-
This just in!
Yep, it looks like Spidy, other ISG members and I do indeed know and understand Black Americans re Trump based on his true history much better than that clueless numbskull SAS with his sweet recurring Fux News gig does.
I wonder if anyone has finally educated him about that Trump Crime Family racist housing discrimination and Trump's continued and decades long unwavering insistence that 5 Black American men who were fully exonerated for a crime that someone else committed either be executed or rot in prison for the rest of their lives.
You know, so he can finally "know enough" about Trump to perhaps shock the Fux News hosts and a few fellow clueless numbskull young Black men with the truth of it someday, preferably before November.
I am sure he will be able to find another gig after his ass gets fired from Fux News for that.
[B]Stephen A. Smith apologizes for Donald Trump comments, says Black America, NAACP mad at him.
April 23, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.al.com/sports/2024/04/stephen-a-smith-apologizes-for-donald-trump-comments-says-black-america-naacp-mad-at-him.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]He (Trump) continued, asserting that Black people are starting to turn to him because "what's happening to me, happens to them," centering his appeal to Black voters by equating his criminal prosecutions to the historic discrimination Black Americans have faced. [/QUOTE]Really, Donnie? Are you being denied access to housing by an orange racist Crime Family and being chased into prison and your life threatened by a mob led by false public rants out of the pie hole of the patriarch of that orange racist Crime Family too?
-
Repub INCELS don't know...the women's vote is going to get ya!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2910395] Two black men? [URL]https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/18/why-are-black-voters-backing-donald-trump-in-record-numbers[/URL]. [/QUOTE]
Well it would be the first time in a long time, the [b]"polls"[/b] got anything right! (...kkkk!) I'll take the REAL data and go with the well-established, tried and true historical avg. 82% to 86% of black voters stepping up and voting for Biden, come Nov 2024...GUARANTEED!
Hey, feel free to circle-back and say [i]"I told you so"[/i], [b]if[/b] and [b]when[/b] at the end of 2024, Repubs do indeed, get that "almighty" black-vote, that miraculously put them over the top for the WIN. Until then I'll go with the 82% for black voters for Biden.
[LIST]Explain This?
So AGAIN, Elvis 2008, if Trump really does have the "raising" Black vote, then explain to me, why is it that Trump and Repubs, spend an enormous amount of time and money in a mass purge blacks from of voter rolls, suppressing the black votes on voter lists, disproportionately removing drop-boxes and ballot-boxes, primarily in black neighborhoods, in swing states, and calling out ONLY black and brown neighborhoods for voter fraud? [/LIST]But what the INCEL He-Man Woman Hater (aka.INCEL Hoodrat), Elvis 2008, and Repub misogynists, don't realize, is that Repubs are gonna LOSE the election [u]due to the women's vote[/u]. It seems Russia's "useful idiots", are turning away women in the hundreds of thousands, with their Arizona style 1864 backwards-ass abortion politics on women. It WILL BE their UNDOING!
Given the Trump Hush-Money Trial, women once again (right before the 2024 election), get to remind themselves of what a lying "misogynist-pig", looks like, who, was fucking porn stars after his immigrant wife just had child birth. Yes, the one who proudly took away women's freedoms and rights, with the overturned decision of Roe vs Wade. With that in mind, WOMEN will proudly march to the ballot-box and VOTE FOR BIDEN!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2910395] For the record, Steven A Smith has blasted the Democratic lawfare tactics but is not all in on Trump. SAS does not care for Trump's immature antics and is undecided which just shows again you are not listening to blacks. You are just putting out crap you think that they want to hear.
And what you do not get about SAS is that he has the old white man's ear unlike any other black man I know. While you and other Democratic douches are looking down your noses at them, SAS is friends with Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and Chris Mad Dog Russo. He socializes with these men and has their respect and instead of blasting corporate America has learned to understand where they are coming from. He is not just huge in the sports world but acts on the popular soap opera General Hospital. You are clueless to his reach, and your response to what he said? Oh, he is just one voice. LOL.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, right about now SAS, would probably tell Elvis 2008, to [b]"Stay off the Weeeeeeeed!"[/b] (....kkkk!) Who the fuck cares about the who's who, SAS fraternizes with?...[b]Big Whoop![/b]
SAS's influence and reach, my be extensive in sports, but not so much in politics. You Repubs and Trumpsters, may get easily swayed and bamboozled by a fast-talking celebrities, as is case from your recent flawed and corrupt choice of candidates (clowns) for office (ie. wanna be dictators, liars, pussy-grabbers, con men, election deniers, Neo-Nazis, insurrectionists). Conversely, Dems will at the very least put in the work and vet and complete a proper due diligence, on candidates.
AGAIN, dude where's the link/source for the initial interview with SAS and the Rapper?
-
Wow. Good one, Joe. You earned it.
[B]Biden scores major union backing as its leaders attack Trump.
April 23, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/23/politics/biden-building-trades-union-endorsement/index.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]Joe Biden will land a major union endorsement Wednesday from North Americas Building Trades Unions, whose leaders say the president has his infrastructure bill largely to thank for it.
In making one of their earliest ever presidential endorsements, NABTU leaders are kickstarting an eight-figure organizing program to try to deliver their 250,000 members in the battlegrounds of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin for Biden.
The Teamsters, whose endorsement is being pursued by both Biden and Donald Trump, are members of NABTU but abstained from Tuesdays board vote, according to people briefed on the proceedings. They will endorse after their own upcoming convention.
The backing from NABTU, which has 3 million members nationwide, is more enthusiastic than its 2020 backing of Biden. And it comes at a moment when a significant slice of union rank-and-file has split from traditionally Democratic-aligned union leadership in ways that are reverberating through elections. Thats raised questions about the political future of the next generation of union members.
"Its almost like the perfect leader was sent at the perfect time for working people", NABTU President Sean McGarvey told CNN about Biden in an interview announcing the endorsement.
Biden will appear at the unions conference in Washington on Wednesday to officially get the nod which union leaders also want to be seen as a stark rebuff of Trump, who eagerly solicited support from union members and leaders during his time in office, but, their leaders say, didnt deliver. NABTU had called for Trump to resign after the January 6, 2021, insurrection.
In praising Bidens efforts for working people, McGarvey cited the investments and union protections built into the infrastructure act, the Covid-era American Rescue Plan, the CHIPs Act to increase technological production nationwide and the Inflation Reduction Act. He acknowledged that, for the moment, Bidens support is stronger among his unions leadership than it is among many of his members, whom he said were close to evenly split in 2020 between Biden and Trump, and generally remain so.
"They think now Joe Biden and Trump are running again, they think its just two politicians, Same old, same old, McGarvey said. Lo and behold, its not the same old, same old."
AND MORE! [/QUOTE]Really, you MUST read the rest of this report to savor the full delight of these union reps who have had to do business with him more than most slamming Trump for being the Deadbeat Conman Liar everyone by now should know him to be! LOL.
-
Women Winning for BIDEN, in Arizona and Florida...
Much to the chagrin of INCELS and the He-Man Women Haters, the state of Arizona and Florida, is trending more for Biden everyday, due to the women's vote on abortion bans, translating to the increasing popular vote for BIDEN!
Thanks to statements of pure arrogance and malice from political suicide artists like Arizona's failed candidate, election denier and 3x LOSER, Kari Lake, (in so many words) tells Arizonans to, "Get [your ass] in your car and you can go three (3) hours that way" (ie. drive 3-hrs to California for an abortion).
The insensitivity, that Repubs are displaying, isn't lost on the WOMEN is these states, as the push for women's healthcare rights and freedoms are being stomped on and taken away by Repubs with arcane backwards-ass abortion laws from 1864.
[b]Kari Lake Tells Arizonans to Travel for Abortion - Newsweek[/b]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/kari-lake-arizona-travel-three-hours-abortion-1891335[/URL]
Biden and the Dems are experiencing a surge in support from women voters in Arizona and Florida, due to the arcane 1864 abortion bans, squarely knee-capping the Repubs at the ballot-box in Nov 2024, thanks to dimwitted "INCEL-adjacent surrogates" Repubs like Kari Lake.
[b]Democrats bank on abortion in 2024 as Arizona and Florida push stakes higher[/b]
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/13/democrats-abortion-voter-arizona-florida[/URL]
Yep, Florida is now in play. And with abortion and marijuana, now on the ballot, Florida is ripe for the picking. This is a brilliant strategy for Dems in Florida and will illicit an increased turnout of students on campus and thus also increasing the margin of younger women also voting for abortion rights, and in turn a vote for BIDEN!
[b]Just like the Ohio 2023 elections,[/b] having abortion and marijuana on the ballot, is a great strategy and will greatly improve Dems down-ballot and BIDEN winning in Arizona and Florida.
-
Awesome Video Ad and Interview. A Must See.
This video ad and interview of the President of North America's Building Trades Unions might be the most important 9 minutes captured on video this year. It should be required viewing for every American eligible to vote and their children:
[URL]https://youtu.be/iukr0Nj_sAs?si=RcYexFWXcWqDYeiq[/URL]
-
SAS may have Repub friends, but VOTES for Dems 95% of the time...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2910644]Yep, it looks like Spidy, other ISG members and I do indeed know and understand Black Americans re Trump based on his true history much better than that clueless numbskull SAS with his sweet recurring Fux News gig does.
I wonder if anyone has finally educated him about that Trump Crime Family racist housing discrimination and Trump's continued and decades long unwavering insistence that 5 Black American men who were fully exonerated for a crime that someone else committed either be executed or rot in prison for the rest of their lives.
You know, so he can finally "know enough" about Trump to perhaps shock the Fux News hosts and a few fellow clueless numbskull young Black men with the truth of it someday, preferably before November.
I am sure he will be able to find another gig after his ass gets fired from Fux News for that.
[B]Stephen A. Smith apologizes for Donald Trump comments, says Black America, NAACP mad at him.
April 23, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.al.com/sports/2024/04/stephen-a-smith-apologizes-for-donald-trump-comments-says-black-america-naacp-mad-at-him.html[/URL]
Really, Donnie? Are you being denied access to housing by an orange racist Crime Family and being chased into prison and your life threatened by a mob led by false public rants out of the pie hole of the patriarch of that orange racist Crime Family too?[/QUOTE]
EihTooms, with the WIN!
Yet another awesome find and yet another home-run article!
Is it any wonder Elvis 2008, did not want to provide the link to his initial SAS posted article, since SAS clearly states for the record: [LIST][b]First[/b] he apologies, saying that, [i]"...my words were interpreted as associating support for Trump, from the Black community, with all the legal issues he's facing...for that I sincerely apologize."[/i][/LIST][LIST][b]Second[/b] SAS then explains, [i]"To be clear, [b]my words were misconstrued[/b]...for the record my words were taken out of context."[/i][/LIST]It's just hilarious, how Repubs, as far back as Reagan and Bush, have always composed this party narrative (right around election time), that when they find one or two "black celebrities", who suddenly speak favorably for Repubs (often bought/paid for to speak, in the case of Trump), that this somehow represents, of the whole (or very large portion of the) black community in totality.
In short, Repubs, like Elvis 2008, always seem have this collection notion and hope and pray to god, [i][b]that somehow, Black voters would suffer a bout of collective amnesia,[/i][/b] with regards to all the [u]nasty[/u] and [u]illegal[/u] things Trump, Repubs and Conservatives have done and said in the past, to mitigate, suppress and disproportionately target the "black vote", come election time.
Black voters, VOTE for Dems to WIN, with an historic avg. 82%-86% certainty. Repubs should circle-back to me, when this changes.
Until that avg. 82%-86% of black voters, voting for Dems changes, perhaps Repubs should stick to understanding (if that's possible) their crazy base of QAnon, MAGA, Trumpsters, Neo-Nazis, insurrectionists, election deniers, Russian "useful idiots" and INCEL misogynists!
And to Elvis 2008...as SAS would say, "stay off the weeeeeeeeeeeeed" (...kkkk!)
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2910797]EihTooms, with the WIN!
Yet another awesome find and yet another home-run article!
Is it any wonder Elvis 2008, did not want to provide the link to his initial SAS posted article, since SAS clearly states for the record: [LIST][b]First[/b] he apologies, saying that, [i]"...my words were interpreted as associating support for Trump, from the Black community, will all the legal issues he's facing...for that I sincerely apologize."[/i][/LIST][LIST][b]Second[/b] SAS then explains, [i]"To be clear, [b]my words were misconstrued[/b]...for the record my words were taken out of context."[/i][/LIST]It's just hilarious, how Repubs, as far back as Reagan and Bush, have always composed this party narrative (right around election time), that when they find one or two "black celebrities", who suddenly speak favorably for Repubs (often bought/paid for to speak, in the case of Trump), that this somehow is represents, of the whole (or very large portion of the) black community in totality.
In short, Repubs, like Elvis 2008, always seem have this collection notion and hope and pray to god, [i][b]that somehow, Black voters would suffer a bout of collective amnesia,[/i][/b] with regards to all the [u]nasty[/u] and [u]illegal[/u] things Trump, Repubs and Conservatives do and say, to mitigate, suppress and disproportionately target the "black vote", come election time.
And to Elvis 2008...as SAS would say, "stay off the weeeeeeeeeeeeed" (...kkkk!)[/QUOTE]LOL. Oh, so his opinion matters now? He is not a knucklehead? Who has the amnesia now? Who is on the weeeeeeed now?
By the way, if you actually listened to his whole speech, he referenced why he said what he did and why blacks were moving towards Trump and listed multiple sources for his doing so.
I did not say that SAS endorsed Trump. I said he was articulating why blacks were moving towards Trump. So SAS made clear once again that he is not supporting Trump, and you two dummies are running around spiking the football like you won something after saying SAS did not matter. LOL.
And while you post the video, you missed the Twitter feed.
NAACP: Relatable! Show of hands: Anyone in your Black family have 88 felony charges pending, filed for bankruptcy 6 x, made an attempt to overthrow a presidential election and our democracy, and still have the ability to fall asleep in court and dream of being POTUS?
SAS: This is absolutely, positively, sad that you at NAACP would misrepresent my comments like this. I was asked what Blacks WHO SUPPORT TRUMP are thinking as to why they support him. I answer THAT question. Sad! But you're entitled. Good luck. Maybe that will beat Trump, since little else seems to be working which was my overall point. We shall see.
I repeat my point. If SAS endorsed Trump, the election would be done. That probably will not happen now, not after SAS was slapped around by the NAACP but that does not mean that Biden's support amongst blacks is not slipping.
-
It was an exceedingly careless and dumb thing for him to say in proximity to Fux
Unless SAS wants more Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction for America, those are dumb things to say when he could use his position and status to say something more truthful and helpful to the country instead.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2910805]LOL. Oh, so his opinion matters now? He is not a knucklehead? Who has the amnesia now? Who is on the weeeeeeed now?
By the way, if you actually listened to his whole speech, he referenced why he said what he did and why blacks were moving towards Trump and listed multiple sources for his doing so.
I did not say that SAS endorsed Trump. I said he was articulating why blacks were moving towards Trump. So SAS made clear once again that he is not supporting Trump, and you two dummies are running around spiking the football like you won something after saying SAS did not matter. LOL.
And while you post the video, you missed the Twitter feed.
NAACP: Relatable! Show of hands: Anyone in your Black family have 88 felony charges pending, filed for bankruptcy 6 x, made an attempt to overthrow a presidential election and our democracy, and still have the ability to fall asleep in court and dream of being POTUS?
SAS: This is absolutely, positively, sad that you at NAACP would misrepresent my comments like this. I was asked what Blacks WHO SUPPORT TRUMP are thinking as to why they support him. I answer THAT question. Sad! But you're entitled. Good luck. Maybe that will beat Trump, since little else seems to be working which was my overall point. We shall see.
I repeat my point. If SAS endorsed Trump, the election would be done. That probably will not happen now, not after SAS was slapped around by the NAACP but that does not mean that Biden's support amongst blacks is not slipping.[/QUOTE]SAS either seriously not realizing how any vaguely less than supportive comment about Biden or pretending not to know that Fux News as well as every MSM pundit and pro Repub "Bothsider" will most definitely twist and spin it as a Big Win With Minorities for Trump and the Repub Party demonstrates a clumsy, careless and dangerous level of naivety that is at least bordering cheek-to-cheek with being a clueless numbskull.
It was the same with Duane The Rock Johnson publicly stating that he has decided not to endorse Biden or any other candidate this time around. How much of a clueless numbskull or, as dangerous, clumsy naive child would he have to be not to know every Fux News and MSM pro Repub "Bothsider" was going to twist and spin that as him "regretting having endorsed Biden in 2020 because Biden has divided the country so much"? Which is not what Johnson said at all.
Good lord, hasn't he, SAS and others been paying attention to how the only thing The Repub Party of Great Depressions, Great Recessions and Massive Jobs Destruction has to run and win on is twisting and spinning the tiniest gaffe or clumsy, careless vague allusion to some impossibly over exaggerated "America destroying" sucker social issue delivered by one or another clueless numbskull useful idiot who blathers some idiocy right into their waiting traps?
LOL.
-
Well Done, Joe Biden (14th Best President), his STAR is raising...
[QUOTE=EihTooms; ][b] Wow. Good one, Joe. You earned it.[/b]
Biden scores major union backing as its leaders attack Trump. [b]April 23, 2024[/b]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/23/politics/biden-building-trades-union-endorsement/index.html[/URL]
Really, you MUST read the rest of this report to savor the full delight of these union reps who have had to do business with him more than most slamming Trump for being the Deadbeat Conman Liar everyone by now should know him to be! LOL.
[/QUOTE]
Great WIN for BIDEN and more scathing and scorn, from real hard working Americans, talking about real experiences with his grifter predecessor, on past infrastructure projects. Stop me if you've heard this before...
[QUOTE]He was one of the worst clients we ever had, because [b]he rarely kept his word[/b] and it was a fight to get him to pay us back, [NABTU President Sean] McGarvey said. [/QUOTE]
Yes, it's stories like these, hardworking American Laborers and BIDEN needs to keep front and center, that highlights the major differences between 4-yrs of steady economic growth with BIDEN and 4-yrs of mostly "empty promises" and trillion dollar tax cuts for the rich, with his incompetent predecessor.
One final touch, that was very moving, indeed [but not covered in the article], was when a Florida Union worker, had this to say to BIDEN:[LIST] Union Worker: [i]"Mr. President, I want to sincerely thank you. As the [u][b]ONLY[/b][/u] reason, I have a pension, is because of [u][b]YOU![/b][/u] " {...followed by, a standing ovation and loud cheers for BIDEN...}[/i][/LIST]
It was during the failed [b]Republican administration of G.W. Bush[/b] and the 2008 US Sub-Prime Mortgage CRASH, that set off worldwide stock market crashes, and lead to the cause for the hollowing-out of Union Pension Plans going broke.
Very Well Done, President Joe Biden, for fixing bipartisan problems, for ALL Americans, wherever they exist. Blue or Red states!
[b]PS:[/b]
EihTooms, that (9-min.) video is very illuminating. As it shows the liar, charlatan and snake-oil salesman that Trump is, spoken from the lips of laymen and American Tradesmen. As when he promised to fix the UNION pension problems, left by the previous failures of Repub G.W. Bush and did NOTHING!
President Joe Biden, came in and made the Unions Pension Plans whole. BIDEN, just gets things done for the good of the country!
-
Black Voters vote for Dems, on an avg. of 82%, historically 100% of the time!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2910805]LOL. Oh, so his opinion matters now? He is not a knucklehead? Who has the amnesia now? Who is on the weeeeeeed now?
By the way, if you actually listened to his whole speech, he referenced why he said what he did and why blacks were moving towards Trump and listed multiple sources for his doing so.
...
I repeat my point. If SAS endorsed Trump, the election would be done. That probably will not happen now, not after SAS was slapped around by the NAACP but that does not mean that Biden's support amongst blacks is not slipping.[/QUOTE]
Dude, I thought I said, "stay off the weeeeeeeeeeeeed" (...kkkk!)
Elvis 2008, [b]your failure[/b] to understand that SAS holds very little political sway in the black community, is dumbfoundingly odd, at best very amusing, at worse just unbelievably desperate and grasping at straws, as you're now drowning for relevance, on a topic you thought was a slum dunk ages ago.
It's not like your beleaguered Repubs are going to gain any significant amount black voters, to make a difference, not matter how much you [b]"huff-n-puff"[/b], like a big bad weeeeeeeed wolf. (...kkkk!)
Really now...is this just your way of balancing out "the cosmos", with the lost of votes due to [b]the Republican Neo-Nazi SCUM-BAG problem[/b], with the magical "raise" of black voters for Repubs, in the "polls" you sight?
Anywho, here again, are the recent black voting numbers you need to know for, Nov 2024, despite the sources quoted by SAS, and the pundit polls and predictions, he sources. 100% more accurate to be precise:
[b]Pew Research Center, Partisanship by race, ethnicity and education[/b], April 9th, 2024[LIST]
Black voters continue to overwhelmingly associate with the Democratic Party, although the extent of the Democratic advantage among this group has fallen off over the last few years.
[LIST] Currently, 83% of Black voters are Democrats or lean Democratic, while 12% align with the GOP.[/LIST][LIST] As recently as 2020, the share associating with the Democratic Party was 5 percentage points higher. That somewhat larger edge in party affiliation had been in place for much of the last two decades.[/LIST]Pew Research Cente: [URL]https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/09/partisanship-by-race-ethnicity-and-education/[/URL][/LIST]
Once you've taken in those historic numbers on black voters, perhaps you'll be inclined to go back and answer my questions w/r to [i]"Why Repubs, are always suppressing the black vote, if black voters are so very important to them?"[/i]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2910901]
Elvis 2008, [b]your failure[/b] to understand that SAS holds very little political sway in the black community, is dumbfoundingly odd, at best very amusing, at worse just unbelievably desperate and grasping at straws, as you're now drowning for relevance, on a topic you thought was a slum dunk ages ago.[/QUOTE]You think the NAACP corrects nobodies? Again, this is just stupid. He has enormous influence. You still do not get that. Why do you think there was such a backlash?
[QUOTE=Spidy;2910901]Currently, 83% of Black voters are Democrats or lean Democratic, while 12% align with the GOP.
As recently as 2020, the share associating with the Democratic Party was 5 percentage points higher. That somewhat larger edge in party affiliation had been in place for much of the last two decades.[/QUOTE]Again, you are not listening to what SAS was saying or all the newspaper articles he referred to. He affirmed the dwindling black support in his own personal circles. He has condemned the Democratic party for its lawfare tactics, and he has blasted the party for going with an 82 year old man who will be 86 when his term is up if he wins.
The interesting thing to me were the Twitter comments. Yeah, there were 3:1 against SAS and for the NAACP. To me, that shows a splintering. I have never seen black folks criticize the NAACP like I did in those comments. So you believe what you want. We will see what happens with the vote.
-
SAS backpedals, but sparks new criticism...
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2910911]You think the NAACP corrects nobodies? Again, this is just stupid. He has enormous influence. You still do not get that. Why do you think there was such a backlash?[/QUOTE]Influence..sure if you're looking to talk sports or make a sports bet on the Lakers. Politics not so much! The backlash, is for making dumbass comments and comparisons, to the lived black experience, when he should know better.
Next you're gonna tell me Kanye West, has enormous political influence, in the black community (....kkkk!)
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2910911]Again, you are not listening to what SAS was saying or all the newspaper articles he referred to. He affirmed the dwindling black support in his own personal circles. He has condemned the Democratic party for its lawfare tactics, and he has blasted the party for going with an 82 year old man who will be 86 when his term is up if he wins. [/QUOTE]Black voters, VOTE for Dems to WIN, with an historic avg. 82%-86% certainty. Repubs should circle-back to me, when this changes.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2910911]The interesting thing to me were the Twitter comments. Yeah, there were 3:1 against SAS and for the NAACP. To me, that shows a splintering. I have never seen black folks criticize the NAACP like I did in those comments. So you believe what you want. We will see what happens with the vote.[/QUOTE]
Elvis 2008, as a gullible FOXY Muse watcher and in true Republican fashion, you're mistakenly taking his [i][b]"numbskull comments"[/i][/b] of equating Trump trials with the lived "black experience" (which EihTooms and I have previously highlighted) and his [i][b]"SAS on-air flare",[/i][/b] to pander to a mainly white MAGA FOXY Muse audience, as a recurring paid gig (which EihTooms and I, have already said he was doing), and in true FOXY Muse tabloid journalism style, blown it up and sensationalized it into something it's not.
The backlash, was definitely more about SAS's [i][b]"numbskull comments",[/i][/b] equating persecuted Black historical figures by LE, with that of a rich white (quasi) billionaire paying hush-money to a porn-star, that was in violation of campaign finance laws, covered-up and made into illegal business payments, is akin to the persecuted black experience?
[u]SAS trying to backpedal:[/u]
[b]Shameful and Pathetic: Stephen A. Smiths Apology Over Problematic Trump Comments Sparks New Criticism for Insulting Black Peoples Intelligence[/b]
[URL]https://atlantablackstar.com/2024/04/23/stephen-a-smith-attempts-to-clarify-controversial-remarks-claims-words-were-misconstrued/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Atlanta Black Star]"Since you're claiming we misconstrued your words, enlighten us. Which of our historic, iconic figures (your words), that were persecuted by law-enforcement, do Black people relate to Donald Trump:," Swan began his post before naming a few civil rights leaders and freedom fighters including Martin Luther King Jr. and Fred Hampton.
Which one of them, who suffered fighting for the rights and the humanity of Black people, is best to compare with someone being prosecuted for illegally paying hush money to a porn star he had sex with, he questioned, adding, Ill wait..." {...then comes the SAS backpedaling ... } [/QUOTE]
Once again you're conflating his "sports celebrity" and on-air presence, as having some kind of huge "political sway". He was being excoriated, slammed and roasted by the black community, for his [i][b]"numbskull comments"[/i][/b], as he should know better, than to make such false and egregious comparisons.
The fact that he was equating Trump's legal problems, with those of historical Black people, who have [b]truly been persecuted[/b], jailed and victimized by LE and the US Criminal Justice system, was just indefensible.
The backlash, was no doubt warranted, not because they necessarily have political sway, but because their "celebrity" affords them a certain standing in the community and when you make stupid comments or do stupid things, you should expect condemnation.
Funny I don't remember any such outcry, when Rep. Tony Gonzalez (R-TX), scathing report of Republican Neo-Nazi SCUMBAGS, came to be known as huge problem. Repubs just seem to accept this as fact?
Hmmm...I wonder what's worse, poor criminal treatment of blacks by LE comparisons with Trump or Repubs who don't seem to mind the Neo-Nazi SCUMBAGS problem they have?
-
Republicans love their affable Celebrities...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2910848]Unless SAS wants more Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction for America, those are dumb things to say when he could use his position and status to say something more truthful and helpful to the country instead.
SAS either seriously not realizing how any vaguely less than supportive comment about Biden or pretending not to know that Fux News as well as every MSM pundit and pro Repub "Bothsider" will most definitely twist and spin it as a Big Win With Minorities for Trump and the Repub Party demonstrates a clumsy, careless and dangerous level of naivety that is at least bordering cheek-to-cheek with being a clueless numbskull.
It was the same with Duane The Rock Johnson publicly stating that he has decided not to endorse Biden or any other candidate this time around. How much of a clueless numbskull or, as dangerous, clumsy naive child would he have to be not to know every Fux News and MSM pro Repub "Bothsider" was going to twist and spin that as him "regretting having endorsed Biden in 2020 because Biden has divided the country so much"? Which is not what Johnson said at all.
Good lord, hasn't he, SAS and others been paying attention to how the only thing The Repub Party of Great Depressions, Great Recessions and Massive Jobs Destruction has to run and win on is twisting and spinning the tiniest gaffe or clumsy, careless vague allusion to some impossibly over exaggerated "America destroying" sucker social issue delivered by one or another clueless numbskull useful idiot who blathers some idiocy right into their waiting traps?
LOL.[/QUOTE]SAS is primarily a sports journalist and has made a name for himself in the sports world as sports pundit and critic. Basically, he's an entertainer. Same thing with Duane The Rock Johnson, as you already know, he's an actor, movie star and pro-wrestler. Again, basically an entertainer.
And while both of these gentlemen, have done a lot of good for their respective communities (HBCs, charities, underprivileged kids programs...etc), their numbskull/knuckle headed comments, while clumsy and careless, shouldn't be given too much credence (as IMHO it's not warranted). These insignificant celebrity flare-ups, carry very little weight in the political arena and at the ballot-box when it actually comes time to vote.
Repubs, can have all knuckle headed celebrity gaffes, if they feel it will translate to votes. President Joe Biden, thank god, is focused on the votes of hardworking American Laborers and NABTU workers that know, [i]"He [TRUMP] was one of the worst clients we ever had, because he rarely kept his word and it was a fight to get him to pay us back".[/i] --NABTU President Sean McGarvey
In the case of SAS, as you've stated, he should know better. But FOXY Muse, have also had a lifetime of twisting almost everything in their sights, to suit their right-wing agenda/narrative. [b]That is literally their fucking shtick![/b]
Point and case, as just the other day, a new version of the game SCRAMBLE was released and reported as being "easier" and "more inclusive" (not sure who initially came up with those terms to describe the game), but leave it to the pundits over at FOXY Muse to label is as "WOKE!" and "WOKE SCRAMBLE!".
But when you consider that the [b]Republican party, is nothing more than, performance theater,[/b] clowns performing for their supper and a spectacle comedy of errors, meant to entertain rather than govern responsibly by the rule of law and the US Constitution, it should come as no surprise, that Repubs would rather focus on the nonsense and crap, coming from the mouths of "clowns", "numbskulls" and "knuckle heads", for the mere entertainment of their gullible audiences, as opposed to doing any real official legislative work.
-
[B]USGOV hostile to crypto[/B]
[URL]https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2024/04/24/the-ever-dwindling-chances-for-a-stablecoin-law/[/URL]
It is bad law. Stifles innovation, liquidity and movement of capital in the markets.
Elements in the USGOV are afraid. Because crypto is not reliant on any of the favorite idiots everyone like to talk about on both side of aisle up in here.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2910995]Influence..sure if you're looking to talk sports or make a sports bet on the Lakers. Politics not so much! The backlash, is for making dumbass comments and comparisons, to the lived black experience, when he should know better.
Next you're gonna tell me Kanye West, has enormous political influence, in the black community (....kkkk!)
Black voters, VOTE for Dems to WIN, with an historic avg. 82%-86% certainty. Repubs should circle-back to me, when this changes.
Elvis 2008, as a gullible FOXY Muse watcher and in true Republican fashion, you're mistakenly taking his [i][b]"numbskull comments"[/i][/b] of equating Trump trials with the lived "black experience" (which EihTooms and I have previously highlighted)[/QUOTE]Yeah, you and Thailand Tooms know all about the "black experience" living in Thailand and God knows whatever. Yeah, you are so open minded you called a black man a numbskull because he told you what you did not want to hear. Racist much?
And you did not listen to a fucking word of what he said. This is what he referenced:
Chicago Tribune with the headline: This time Trump seems to be making black voter inroads. Why?
[URL]https://www.pressherald.com/2024/03/20/clarence-page-this-time-trump-really-does-seem-to-be-making-black-voter-inroads/[/URL]
The Washington Post: Voters of color are shifting right. Are Democrats doomed?
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/19/black-latino-asian-voters-2024-presidential-election-republican/[/URL]
As black voters shift to Trump, Biden's allies say he has work to do.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/06/us/politics/biden-trump-black-voters-poll-democrats.html.[/URL]
Big Biden bummer: and. Why. Times / Siena poll shows gaps with key Democratic groups.
[URL]https://www.axios.com/2024/03/02/biden-trump-siena-poll-nyt[/URL]
The Hill Biden losing support among black voters.
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4587742-biden-losing-support-among-black-voters-in-swing-states-survey/[/URL]
Biden loses support among black men.
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/biden-trump-black-men-support-election-2024-poll-a7d9da22[/URL]
So wait, this was not about Fox News, SAS, or even me. It was about a black man who saw those stories and asked around to verify what was going on and found out that the polls were right, and he relayed to the world all that he heard.
And what do you call two douches like yourself Spidy and Tooms who tune out what a black person says, call him a knucklehead, a Foxy want to be, just prominent in the sports world, and yet lecture everyone on the "black experience"? Oh, yeah, you two douches know all about racism because you old farts were the ones practicing it.
In fact one of the memes on Twitter was a black man holding a whip that was labeled NAACP and the black man being whipped was labeled blacks who vote Republican. Or Biden saying, if you do not vote for me, you are not black. Hmmm.
To recount what SAS Smith said: "As much as people may have been abhorred by Donald Trump's statement weeks ago, talking about how he's hearing that Black folks find him relatable because of what he is going through is similar to what Black Americans have gone through, he wasn't lying; he was telling the truth. ".
And this is the response of the Democratic former Sportscenter host and demagogue Keith Olbermann, "So why is today's ESPN letting Smith do it? Why is he campaigning for Trump on Fox News? ESPN must make him choose between advocating for a despot or keeping his job saying nothing particularly relevant about sports-not both. And I'd insist on the same either / or if he were campaigning for Biden. ".
If SAS were campaigning for Biden, a douche like Olbermann wouldn't say shit and everyone knows it.
This is not being a Fox dupe. You and Tooms displayed classic Democratic douche motives as does Olbermann who goes out and fucking lies about SAS supporting Trump. Yeah, this is douchery at its finest: Lie and attack anyone who does not toe the Democratic party line even if that line is false and censor and fire anyone who does not toe the line.
The real crime SAS committed is he told you something that you did not want to hear AKA the truth. Oh yeah, I forgot. All the polls are wrong because you douches say they are.
-
Good article. You should send that link to SAS
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2911150]Yeah, you and Thailand Tooms know all about the "black experience" living in Thailand and God knows whatever. Yeah, you are so open minded you called a black man a numbskull because he told you what you did not want to hear. Racist much?
And you did not listen to a fucking word of what he said. This is what he referenced:
Chicago Tribune with the headline: This time Trump seems to be making black voter inroads. Why?
[URL]https://www.pressherald.com/2024/03/20/clarence-page-this-time-trump-really-does-seem-to-be-making-black-voter-inroads/[/URL]
The Washington Post: Voters of color are shifting right. Are Democrats doomed?
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/19/black-latino-asian-voters-2024-presidential-election-republican/[/URL]
As black voters shift to Trump, Biden's allies say he has work to do.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/06/us/politics/biden-trump-black-voters-poll-democrats.html.[/URL]
Big Biden bummer: and. Why. Times / Siena poll shows gaps with key Democratic groups.
[URL]https://www.axios.com/2024/03/02/biden-trump-siena-poll-nyt[/URL]
The Hill Biden losing support among black voters.
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4587742-biden-losing-support-among-black-voters-in-swing-states-survey/[/URL]
Biden loses support among black men.
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/biden-trump-black-men-support-election-2024-poll-a7d9da22[/URL]
So wait, this was not about Fox News, SAS, or even me. It was about a black man who saw those stories and asked around to verify what was going on and found out that the polls were right, and he relayed to the world all that he heard.
And what do you call two douches like yourself Spidy and Tooms who tune out what a black person says, call him a knucklehead, a Foxy want to be, just prominent in the sports world, and yet lecture everyone on the "black experience"? Oh, yeah, you two douches know all about racism because you old farts were the ones practicing it.
In fact one of the memes on Twitter was a black man holding a whip that was labeled NAACP and the black man being whipped was labeled blacks who vote Republican. Or Biden saying, if you do not vote for me, you are not black. Hmmm.
To recount what SAS Smith said: "As much as people may have been abhorred by Donald Trump's statement weeks ago, talking about how he's hearing that Black folks find him relatable because of what he is going through is similar to what Black Americans have gone through, he wasn't lying; he was telling the truth. ".
And this is the response of the Democratic former Sportscenter host and demagogue Keith Olbermann, "So why is today's ESPN letting Smith do it? Why is he campaigning for Trump on Fox News? ESPN must make him choose between advocating for a despot or keeping his job saying nothing particularly relevant about sports-not both. And I'd insist on the same either / or if he were campaigning for Biden. ".
If SAS were campaigning for Biden, a douche like Olbermann wouldn't say shit and everyone knows it.
This is not being a Fox dupe. You and Tooms displayed classic Democratic douche motives as does Olbermann who goes out and fucking lies about SAS supporting Trump. Yeah, this is douchery at its finest: Lie and attack anyone who does not toe the Democratic party line even if that line is false and censor and fire anyone who does not toe the line.
The real crime SAS committed is he told you something that you did not want to hear AKA the truth. Oh yeah, I forgot. All the polls are wrong because you douches say they are.[/QUOTE]The first link you posted from the Portland Press Herald would be a great link to send to SAS along with a strong recommendation that he share it with every young Black man he meets. You could also strongly recommend he share all of the important details of it with his Fux News sweet gig hosts and audience.
That is the article that reminds us of Trump's history of anti Black discrimination lawsuits, his still unwavering insistence that 5 Black men who were fully exonerated of the crime he exploited for his own celebrity and White Nationalist credentials be publicly executed or rot in prison the rest of their lives and, oh yeah, the Birther Scam he perpetuated for that same celebrity, White Nationalist credentials and Republican Party credentials purpose, claiming / lying that he had hired some investigators to research Obama's birth certificate records in Hawaii and were "finding some very interesting things. ".
Now, I happen to know all about that critically important history of Donald Trump's lifelong quest for celebrity and White Nationalist credentials by stepping on Black Americans whenever and wherever he could.
But it is obvious that Stephen A. Smith does not "know enough" about Trump to make up his mind who he will endorse and vote for this year. As does so many young Black men in America today.
And now that YOU know all about it, having heard and read about it from me and Clarence Page in the link you posted here but most definitely never heard it from SAS or anyone he is likely to find himself chatting with on Fux News, it really should be your mission in life to get that info to SAS, Fux News and as many young Black men as you come in contact with on a daily basis.
I mean, since you obviously care so much about the truth, the plight of Black Americans and all that.
I would do it myself. But rumor has it that neither mail nor email nor cyberspace in general can make a connection between Black men or anyone else in the USA and Bangkok Thailand and that only people who live right next door to each other can share and know these things.
Despite the fact that I know and knew these things yet SAS, Fux News, you and a whole bunch of young Black men in America didn't. Amazing, huh.
-
Anyone watching what's going on with SCOTUS?
SCOTUS - It would painfully seem, that our (well some Repubs and most Dems anyways) worst concerns w/r to SCOTUS is being realized.
As some have long speculated, the current incarnation of SCOTUS, is nothing more than just another conservative, right-wing political arm of the Republican Party. At this point they are no better than the party's propaganda machine over at FOXY Muse.
It is clear now, judging by the last several cases, briefs and oral arguments, brought before SCOTUS, that their blatant and obvious biases, rulings and lines of questioning, tilt towards the belief that, their conservative party policy goals, are being placed before everything, including...DEMOCRACY. And a "blind", fair and impartial interpretation of the law, is nothing more than lip service.
If justice is blind, then this version of SCOTUS, is obviously "cheating" and seeing only out of ONE EYE, the one on the "right".
-
Why do Repubs, fear the Black VOTE?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2911150] So wait, this was not about Fox News, SAS, or even me. It was about a black man who saw those stories and asked around to verify what was going on and found out that the polls were right, and he relayed to the world all that he heard.
And what do you call two douches like yourself Spidy and Tooms who tune out what a black person says, call him a knucklehead, a Foxy want to be, just prominent in the sports world, and yet lecture everyone on the "black experience"? Oh, yeah, you two douches know all about racism because you old farts were the ones practicing it.
...
The real crime SAS committed is he told you something that you did not want to hear AKA the truth. Oh yeah, I forgot. All the polls are wrong because you douches say they are.[/QUOTE]Just love the enthusiasm, bluster and rant!
But please explain this!
[LIST]So AGAIN, Elvis 2008, if Trump really does have the "raising" Black vote, then explain to me, [b]why[/b] is it that Trump and Repubs, spend an enormous amount of effort, time and money, in a myriad of attempts around the country, to service mass purges of Blacks from of voter rolls, or suppressing the black votes on voter lists, or disproportionately removing drop-boxes and ballot-boxes, primarily in black neighborhoods, in swing states?
And why call out ONLY black and brown neighborhoods and people for voter fraud and election fraud, in said swing states? [/LIST]Why do ALL that, if the Black VOTE is in the proverbial BAG? [i](Yeah, not to be confused with your usage of "D-BAG"...kkkk!)[/i]
[b]So why do Repubs, fear the BLACK VOTE?[/b]
-
There are at least 5 fully QAnon MAGAs on the SCOTUS
[QUOTE=Spidy;2911176]SCOTUS - It would painfully seem, that our (well some Repubs and most Dems anyways) worst concerns w/r to SCOTUS is being realized.
As some have long speculated, the current incarnation of SCOTUS, is nothing more than just another conservative, right-wing political arm of the Republican Party. At this point they are no better than the party's propaganda machine over at FOXY Muse.
It is clear now, judging by the last several cases, briefs and oral arguments, brought before SCOTUS, that their blatant and obvious biases, rulings and lines of questioning, tilt towards the belief that, their conservative party policy goals, are being placed before everything, including...DEMOCRACY. And a "blind", fair and impartial interpretation of the law, is nothing more than lip service.
If justice is blind, then this version of SCOTUS, is obviously "cheating" and seeing only out of ONE EYE, the one on the "right".[/QUOTE]I was soooo looking forward to the 6 genius Repub-appointed Justices to rule that President Joe Biden has total immunity from criminal prosecution if he orders the assassination of all 6 of the genius Repub-appointed Justicies just for the hell of it tomorrow as long as he "alleges" that he did so pursuant to his official presidential duties. LOL.
Alas, it appears they will instead comply with Trump's desperate need to delay delay delay all of his criminal trials by kicking that decision down the road for someone else to make.
But, absolutely, the line of questioning by those 6 genius Repub-appointed Justices strongly suggests they have totally bought the loony Trump / QAnon MAGA premise that Trump gathering and inciting a violent cop-killing mob of insurrectionists to storm the Capitol, search out his VP to publicly hang him, shoot or kidnap the Speaker of the House, overturn a free and fair election and overthrow American democracy while Trump sat on his fat ass for 3 hours doing nothing except enjoying the show and praising them for their loyalty to him was not the historically dangerous and unique event to be fretting over.
Oh no.
Of course, according to their loony America-hating QAnon MAGA way of thinking, it is the wheels of justice daring to turn toward Trump for perpetrating that outrageously traitorous crime against America that is the really annoying thing about all of this. LOL.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2911183]Just love the enthusiasm, bluster and rant!
But please explain this!
So AGAIN, Elvis 2008, if Trump really does have the "raising" Black vote, then explain to me, [b]why[/b] is it that Trump and Repubs, spend an enormous amount of effort, time and money, in a myriad of attempts around the country, to service mass purges of Blacks from of voter rolls, or suppressing the black votes on voter lists, or disproportionately removing drop-boxes and ballot-boxes, primarily in black neighborhoods, in swing states?
And why call out ONLY black and brown neighborhoods and people for voter fraud and election fraud, in said swing states?[/QUOTE]Yeah, funny, the heads of Black Lives Matter do not live in predominantly black neighborhoods so they have no issues with voting as easily as white people.
As for why the restrictions, you know damned well why. Because that is where the cheating is!
Google has done a pretty good job of wiping out what happened in 2020 as has duckduckgo, but it is still there if you look hard enough. [URL]https://rumble.com/vbvwfd-ep.-32-election-lawsuits-fraud-explained-viva-and-barnes-live-stream-nov.-4.html[/URL].
You can go the 17 minute mark on this video and see for yourself. It is amazing how black voters were more excited to vote for Biden than Obama but only in swing states. Boy the blacks turned out in droves in Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta, Phoenix, and Nevada, but for some reason, they had below average turnout in other places. Gee, I wonder why.
And then there were 100,000 ballots miraculously where the only person voted for was Joe Biden. That only happened in contested states but in uncontested states, and Biden won by 44,000 votes in Georgia, Arizona, and Wisconsin, which separated him from Trump in the Electoral College.
Democrats got away with this crap in 2020 but it is going to be MUCH harder in 2024 to cheat. That is why you have to do this lawfare bullshit.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2911176]SCOTUS - It would painfully seem, that our (well some Repubs and most Dems anyways) worst concerns w/r to SCOTUS is being realized.
As some have long speculated, the current incarnation of SCOTUS, is nothing more than just another conservative, right-wing political arm of the Republican Party. At this point they are no better than the party's propaganda machine over at FOXY Muse.
It is clear now, judging by the last several cases, briefs and oral arguments, brought before SCOTUS, that their blatant and obvious biases, rulings and lines of questioning, tilt towards the belief that, their conservative party policy goals, are being placed before everything, including...DEMOCRACY. And a "blind", fair and impartial interpretation of the law, is nothing more than lip service.
If justice is blind, then this version of SCOTUS, is obviously "cheating" and seeing only out of ONE EYE, the one on the "right".[/QUOTE]Boo hoo, Boo hoo! The Democratic party, the party of trial lawyers, the party trying to win the election in the court room is not getting their way. The idiot partisan appeals court in DC made one of the most boneheaded rulings in recent times and SCOTUS has stopped them. You are just so obsessed with getting Trump you are too stupid to see this goes way beyond him.
From the hearing:
In one of the many hypotheticals the liberals tossed at Trump's attorney, Kagan asked what would happen if a president ordered the military to stage a coup. Could that be prosecuted under Trump's theory?
"If there's no threat of criminal prosecution, what prevents the president from just doing whatever he wants?" Jackson said. "I'm trying to understand what the disincentive is from turning the Oval Office into the seat of criminal activity in this country. "
These are two great questions from liberal Democratic judges. SCOTUS is doing its job untangle the politics from the idiotic DC ruling. I am complimenting Dems here.
Alito went as far as to suggest that denying ex-presidents immunity would discourage peaceful transfers of power, because outgoing presidents who lost hotly contested elections would not want to depart peacefully if they were concerned they'd be prosecuted by their political rival.
To those of us with a brain, this is a valid concern and yet to douches like you Spidy who only care about your SS check, it is blasphemy. Alito is Fox news watching, biased pond scum when he is asking a good question and doing his fucking job.
An attorney offers this assessment of the questioning.
I listened to the entire argument. The Court will reject Trump's absolute immunity argument. Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett crapped all over that idea.
But the Justices don't like the DC Circuit approach. There is a principle of limited immunity for official acts obviously, never applied in the Presidential context but applied to protect officials from criminal suits involving allegations of violations of citizens' constitutional rights. Kavanaugh and Roberts supporting him, seem inclined to apply that principle here. (Barrett seemed like she was torn as to whether to do that or join the liberals.). That will require a preliminary fact-based hearing to determine which acts were "official" and deserve limited immunity and which acts are private and get no immunity. I feel pretty confident that's what will happen here. Barrett would be the sixth vote. Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas might go for absolute immunity, but that doesn't matter, as the deciding votes determine the remedy.
So, that's what's going to happen. This means no trial before the election. But Judge Tanya Churkin, who controls her own calendar, will follow the SC's mandate and conduct a fact-based preliminary hearing to determine which acts were official and which were private.
Trump did not get everything he wanted, but he did get the most that could be realistically expected.
The fact finding mission and subsequent delays men there will be no more trials before the election.
So yeah, the Democratic members of SCOTUS will vote against Trump, there is no reason for them not to, but they know presidents need some degree of immunity. Quite frankly, seeing how this was always about preventing Trump from being elected, there will probably be no new lawsuits.
And the whole Democratic lawfare strategy has blown up in the face of Democrats. In reality, not only is SCOTUS not corrupt, they seem to be the only court room that is not ridiculously partisan. Like I have said before, we do not have a DOJ. We have a DDOJ, a Democratic Department of Justice.
-
Will those Repubs on Earth 2, ever come back to Reality?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2911150]Yeah, you and Thailand Tooms know all about the "black experience" living in Thailand and God knows whatever. Yeah, you are so open minded you called a black man a numbskull because he told you what you did not want to hear. Racist much?
And you did not listen to a fucking word of what he said. This is what he referenced:
Chicago Tribune with the headline: This time Trump seems to be making black voter inroads. Why?
[URL]https://www.pressherald.com/2024/03/20/clarence-page-this-time-trump-really-does-seem-to-be-making-black-voter-inroads/[/URL]
The Washington Post: Voters of color are shifting right. Are Democrats doomed?
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/19/black-latino-asian-voters-2024-presidential-election-republican/[/URL]
As black voters shift to Trump, Biden's allies say he has work to do.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/06/us/politics/biden-trump-black-voters-poll-democrats.html.[/URL]
Big Biden bummer: and. Why. Times / Siena poll shows gaps with key Democratic groups.
[URL]https://www.axios.com/2024/03/02/biden-trump-siena-poll-nyt[/URL]
The Hill Biden losing support among black voters.
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4587742-biden-losing-support-among-black-voters-in-swing-states-survey/[/URL]
Biden loses support among black men.
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/biden-trump-black-men-support-election-2024-poll-a7d9da22[/URL]
So wait, this was not about Fox News, SAS, or even me. It was about a black man who saw those stories and asked around to verify what was going on and found out that the polls were right, and he relayed to the world all that he heard.
...
The real crime SAS committed is he told you something that you did not want to hear AKA the truth. Oh yeah, I forgot. All the polls are wrong because you douches say they are.[/QUOTE]
BTW, I don't recall any Dems here saying, the polls from the list, you or SAS have sighted, were false or fake, w/r to the rise in black voters for Trump. But leave it to you and your warped, bent and pernicious mind to think that.
Providing factual and historical information, in addition to said polls, simply gives the readers the complete picture, which SAS failed to do. But should have know better, when making dumbass comparisons with the persecuted lived "black experience" and a pampered, spoiled-ass, gold-plated-toilet-seat, pussy-grabber, porn-star fucking, hush-money orange ex-president.
[b]Black voters continue to overwhelmingly associate with the Democratic Party, ...[/b]
[URL]Pew Research Center: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/09/partisanship-by-race-ethnicity-and-education/[/URL]
That fact that SAS himself, nor any of the articles mention, that black voters have historical voted with an avg. of 82-86%, is misleading, disingenuous and is not portraying the full story of how Black voters REALLY vote. The article(s) I presented, simply full-in-the-blanks and give readers the other half [b](the REAL half)[/b] of the Black voting behavioral patterns/history.
Don't forget SAS himself says he votes for Dems 95% of the time.
Yes, polls and polling have their uses and are nice to have, in order to gauge [i][u]what "might" happen[/u][/i], but historical FACTS and FIGURES, will 100% always trump the inaccurate, inexact and often unreliable use of polls.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2911324]Yeah, funny, the heads of Black Lives Matter do not live in predominantly black neighborhoods so they have no issues with voting as easily as white people.[/QUOTE]
(...kkkk!) Please provide the source for your wild conjuncture!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2911324]As for why the restrictions, you know damned well why. Because that is where the cheating is!
Google has done a pretty good job of wiping out what happened in 2020 as has duckduckgo, but it is still there if you look hard enough. [URL]https://rumble.com/vbvwfd-ep.-32-election-lawsuits-fraud-explained-viva-and-barnes-live-stream-nov.-4.html[/URL]. [/QUOTE]
Elvis 2008, dude, check your search engine, then check your computer, then go get your eyes checked. Google tells me (and about 80% of Americans with 20/20 vision) exactly what happened in Nov 2020, with perfect clarity. [b]Spoiler alert...BIDEN WINS!!![/b]
Biden Wins: 2020 Presidential Election Results
[URL]https://www.npr.org/2020/11/07/928803493/biden-wins-presidency-according-to-ap-edging-trump-in-turbulent-race[/URL]
Joe Biden Wins US Presidential Election, Results and Electoral Map 2020
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/07/politics/joe-biden-wins-us-presidential-election/index.html [/URL]
Electoral college confirms Joe Biden's presidential victory - BBC
[URL]https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55308526[/URL]
[b]FUN FACT: [/b]Even though, Republican's very own investigations ([u]spanning over a decade[/u] and [u]examining over a billion votes[/u]) have turned up NOTHING, in the way of wide spread systemic voter fraud, they still yet push this bogus narrative of election fraud. [b]Why you ask? [/b]
Well it really very simply. Republican's know, their base is stinking and hell is likely to freeze over, before they win at the ballot-box, or with populous vote, ever again. Therefore the only option is for Repubs to CHEAT, CHEAT and CHEAT some more. Oh, and while we're at it, be sure to also accuse our opponents of doing the same. You know, do a lot of projecting and thereby muddy the waters, as to who is really doing the cheating.
Why do Repubs, now choose CHEATING to win? Because CHEATING (and LYING) is the only game Repubs know they're good at and it's the ONLY WAY they now know, to beat the Dems.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2911324] You can go the 17 minute mark on this video and see for yourself ... [/QUOTE] Sure, dude, sure...whatever you say! All debunked already! You can come back to reality, anytime now!
But, since I'm well aware YOU, Elvis 2008, seem to have one foot, firmly planted in [b]the of world of conspiracies[/b] and the other foot in [b]the world of lies at FOXY Muse[/b], one can only surmise, you seem very antithetical and even allergic to the truth?
-
Howard Stern is supporting/voting for BIDEN and says "Thanks Joe"...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2911150]Yeah, you and Thailand Tooms know all about the "black experience" ...
...
The Hill Biden losing support among black voters.
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4587742-biden-losing-support-among-black-voters-in-swing-states-survey/[/URL]
Biden loses support among black men.
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/biden-trump-black-men-support-election-2024-poll-a7d9da22[/URL]
So wait, this was not about Fox News, SAS, or even me. It was about a black man who saw those stories and asked around to verify what was going on and found out that the polls were right, and he relayed to the world all that he heard...[/QUOTE]
For those Repubs, and affordable ISG INCEL conspiracists, that just love to fawn all over themselves and cream their pants, when it comes to celebrity endorsements, [b]Howard Stern[/b], [u]may have just sealed the deal[/u]...for a BIDEN win!!!
And hey, look mom, no celebrity flip-flopping, grandstanding, word salad or clever backpedaling, surrounding an ambiguous interview, with [b][i]'misconstrued words'[/i][/b] I said, w/r to my unwavering support for President Joe Biden.
[b]Biden Revisits His Past in Interview With Howard Stern[/b]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/26/us/politics/biden-howard-stern-trump.html[/URL]
In an interview with President Joe Biden, Howard says [u]while he votes [b]Republican[/b] most times[/u], he will not vote for an idiot (in Trump), that wants to destroy DEMOCRACY.
With at peak viewership in late 2019 at around 35 million, that's a [u]big boost[/u] for Biden, [b]among white males.[/b] Howard Stern audience are upscale professionals. 74% of his audience are between 25-54 years of age with an average household income of $160k. 73% Male and 27% female. 34% college graduates, 85% white.
[b]Howard Stern Thanks President Joe Biden[/b] for Making a Difference
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxL1_K-bq2I[/URL]
35 million listeners/viewers, with a clear unambiguous vote for BIDEN! [b][i]Now that's some political sway[/i][/b].
Thanks Joe! Thanks Howard!
-
Fuck SCOTUS...in Hush Money Alvin Bragg we TRUST!!!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2911194]I was soooo looking forward to the 6 genius Repub-appointed Justices to rule that President Joe Biden has total immunity from criminal prosecution if he orders the assassination of all 6 of the genius Repub-appointed Justicies just for the hell of it tomorrow as long as he "alleges" that he did so pursuant to his official presidential duties. LOL.
Alas, it appears they will instead comply with Trump's desperate need to delay delay delay all of his criminal trials by kicking that decision down the road for someone else to make.
But, absolutely, the line of questioning by those 6 genius Repub-appointed Justices strongly suggests they have totally bought the loony Trump / QAnon MAGA premise that Trump gathering and inciting a violent cop-killing mob of insurrectionists to storm the Capitol, search out his VP to publicly hang him, shoot or kidnap the Speaker of the House, overturn a free and fair election and overthrow American democracy while Trump sat on his fat ass for 3 hours doing nothing except enjoying the show and praising them for their loyalty to him was not the historically dangerous and unique event to be fretting over.
Oh no.
Of course, according to their loony America-hating QAnon MAGA way of thinking, it is the wheels of justice daring to turn toward Trump for perpetrating that outrageously traitorous crime against America that is the really annoying thing about all of this. LOL.[/QUOTE]
Oh Yeah, the [i]"SCOTUS conservative [b]sleaze six (6)[/b]"[/i] are definitely looking for a way to exonerate Trump and provide legal vomit, to appease and bamboozle the public with legalese word salad and verbal gymnastics.
I'm half expecting, them to just come out and say, [i]"FUCK IT!...WE GOT NOTHING, that says a president has immunity, but Trump a get out jail free card anyways!"[/i]
But speaking of celebrity endorsements and flip-flops, Bill Maher seem to think Trump will lose the Hush-Money case and it might be a slam-dunk after all.
[QUOTE=RAW Story][b]Bill Maher reveals he thinks Trump could lose hush money case [/b]
"Because I thought, of all the ones you are bringing, this is going the least serious," Maher said, adding that he went as far as to write editorials about it. "Now I think Trump could lose. I'm turning on this one, because it's not what I thought it was gonna be."
[URL]https://www.rawstory.com/trump-bill-maher-turning-hush-money-case/[/URL][/QUOTE]
This trial is definitely better than advertised, as Trump's LIES are being eviscerated, in true humiliating fashion.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2911727]Because I thought, of all the ones you are bringing, this is going the least serious," Maher said, adding that he went as far as to write editorials about it. "Now I think Trump could lose. I'm turning on this one, because it's not what I thought it was gonna be."[/QUOTE]LOL. Bill Maher is coming around to a guilty verdict in a case so rigged that I said there does not even need to be a trial? Stop the presses. Spidy, you seem to be jerking off to a guilty verdict. You do not need to wait. You can blow your load. It is going to be a guilty verdict.
-
Ask Elvis
[QUOTE=Spidy;2911694]Will those Repubs on Earth 2, ever come back to Reality?[/QUOTE]Come on, you do know the answer, kkkk.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2911827]Come on, you do know the answer, kkkk.[/QUOTE]Yeah, you Democratic douches are so plugged in.
[URL]https://mishtalk.com/politics/james-carville-has-meltdown-over-young-voters-sitting-out-the-election/[/URL]
Trump is ahead in the latest poll. Younger voters leave the Biden camp. James Carville has a meltdown:
"You little f**king 26-year-old, you don't feel like 'the election's important to me. They're not addressing the issues that I care about. '.
"My advice to tell these young people is to get off your motherf**king a** and go vote because you should vote like your entire future and the entire future of this United States depends on it because quite frankly, it does, and that's not an exaggeration. ".
End of link. Classic Democratic douche. I am smarter than you. The economy is better than you think. You were wrong to think you were better under Trump.
And there is more:
In the Biden vs. Trump matchup, the poll finds Biden faring worse than in previous CNN polls among the youngest voters, trailing Trump by a 51%-to-40% margin among voters younger than 35.
Dissatisfaction is starkly prevalent among those with lower incomes (67% dissatisfied in households with annual incomes lower than $50,000), people of color (64% say they are dissatisfied) and younger Americans (61% of those younger than 45 say they are dissatisfied).
On April 20, I commented People Who Rent Will Decide the 2024 Presidential Election.
Q: What is it that young voters really have on their minds?
A: Rent.
Many with rent as their top concern will switch to Trump. They are fed up with rising inflation. Rent is up at least 0. 4 percent per month for 30 months.
Young voters propelled Biden over the top in 2020. Things look very different today.
End of link.
Trump, blah, blah, blah, Qanon, blah, blah, blah, you dumb kids, blah, blah, blah, Fox News blah, blah, blah, Steven A Smith blah, blah, blah indictments blah, blah, blah.
That $100 billion sent abroad to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan could have paid for college for every American student or to health care or to builders so they could build more structures to help with rent. Or better yet, maybe you just quit with the money printing and let inflation and interest rates come down.
And all those anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian students marching does not help the cause does it Xpartan? Do you have anything to offer them outside of more dead bodies or calling them stupid or anti-Semitic?
Yeah, you got the sex case with Jean E. Carroll. You got the business case with the $454 million judgment and you are so going to have the Stormy Daniels illegal entry case. I am sure that guilty verdict is going to change everything. Right?
Do you have anything else? Because to me, it does not look like the young people are buying your BS.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2911846]Yeah, you Democratic douches are so plugged in.
https://mishtalk.com/politics/james-carville-has-meltdown-over-young-voters-sitting-out-the-election
Trump is ahead in the latest poll. Younger voters leave the Biden camp. James Carville has a meltdown:
"You little f**king 26-year-old, you don't feel like 'the election's important to me. They're not addressing the issues that I care about. '.
"My advice to tell these young people is to get off your motherf**king a** and go vote because you should vote like your entire future and the entire future of this United States depends on it because quite frankly, it does, and that's not an exaggeration. ".
End of link. Classic Democratic douche. I am smarter than you. The economy is better than you think. You were wrong to think you were better under Trump.
[/QUOTE]What can I say? He IS smarter than you. The economy IS better than you think. Your entire future depends on people's choices now, because quite frankly America may not survive another 5 years of Trump. And yes, you got to be a total moron to honestly believe you were better under Trump.
Shit, what exactly was better under Trump? The rent?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2911846]And there is more:
In the Biden vs. Trump matchup, the poll finds Biden faring worse than in previous CNN polls among the youngest voters, trailing Trump by a 51%-to-40% margin among voters younger than 35.
Dissatisfaction is starkly prevalent among those with lower incomes (67% dissatisfied in households with annual incomes lower than $50,000), people of color (64% say they are dissatisfied) and younger Americans (61% of those younger than 45 say they are dissatisfied).
On April 20, I commented People Who Rent Will Decide the 2024 Presidential Election.
Q: What is it that young voters really have on their minds?
A: Rent.
Many with rent as their top concern will switch to Trump. They are fed up with rising inflation. Rent is up at least 0. 4 percent per month for 30 months.
Young voters propelled Biden over the top in 2020. Things look very different today.
End of link.[/QUOTE]So what's going to happen under Trump, Elvis? He's going to tackle the rent? What stopped him during his previous term? How's this benevolent super-being going to help the disenfranchised this time around? Pray tell.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2911846]Trump, blah, blah, blah, Qanon, blah, blah, blah, you dumb kids, blah, blah, blah, Fox News blah, blah, blah, Steven A Smith blah, blah, blah indictments blah, blah, blah.
That $100 billion sent abroad to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan could have paid for college for every American student or to health care or to builders so they could build more structures to help with rent. Or better yet, maybe you just quit with the money printing and let inflation and interest rates come down.[/QUOTE]No it wouldn't. Because the bulk of it stays here. In the USA With American military suppliers.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2911846]And all those anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian students marching does not help the cause does it Xpartan? Do you have anything to offer them outside of more dead bodies or calling them stupid or anti-Semitic?[/QUOTE]Umm, no. That covers them. They're stupid or anti-Semitic, or stupid and anti-Semitic.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2911846]Yeah, you got the sex case with Jean E. Carroll. You got the business case with the $454 million judgment and you are so going to have the Stormy Daniels illegal entry case. I am sure that guilty verdict is going to change everything. Right?
Do you have anything else? Because to me, it does not look like the young people are buying your BS.[/QUOTE]Guilty verdicts aren't supposed to change everything, my dear Elvis. Guilty verdicts ensure criminal convictions for perpetrators of crimes.
-
Thanks again, Joe
BULLETIN: There is nothing Trump or any other Know Nothing, Do Nothing Repub can, will or ever has done to lower the cost of your rent, the cost of your mortgage, the cost of your food or the cost of gas except by way of their favorite and only result for every USA economy the American electorate was careless and foolish enough to allow; Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction by any means necessary or opportunistically available.
Meanwhile, Biden / Dem hard work and legislation can, has and will continue to reduce corporate price gouging costs for Americans whenever and wherever they can:
[B]J&J, Bristol Myers Squibb lose challenges to Medicare drug-price negotiations.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/29/jj-bristol-myers-squibb-lose-medicare-drug-price-talks-challenges.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE] A federal judge in New Jersey rejected Johnson & Johnsons and Bristol Myers Squibbs legal challenges to the Biden administrations Medicare drug-price negotiations, ruling that the program is constitutional.
The decision is another win for the White House in a bitter legal fight with several drugmakers over the constitutionality of the price talks.
The ruling also weakens the pharmaceutical industrys strategy of seeking split decisions in lower courts scattered across the U.S., which could escalate the issue to the Supreme Court. [/QUOTE]Never, never, never expect any Repub to accomplish anything like this for the American people no matter how many empty promises they make to do so over the course of 50 years or more.
-
Ask Elvis?
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2911827][b]Ask Elvis[/b]
Come on, you do know the answer, kkkk.[/QUOTE]
Funny enough, when you put it like that, to...[b]"Ask Elvis"[/b], you almost make it sound, like some new MAGA search engine.
You know, like [b]Ask Jeeves[/b], a blast from the past and from beyond the graveyard of search engines, comes [b]"Ask Elvis"[/b] the new Ask Jeeves 2.0, a zombified reincarnation, risen from the dead, that is sure to answer ALL MAGA related questions, conspiracies and alternative facts, for all people still on Earth 2, having problems transitioning BACK TO REALITY! (...kkkk!)
Better yet, if you read the last paragraph in your, "Ryan Reynolds' inner trailer guy announcer's voice", it gets even funnier. [i](ie. "In an political apocalyptic world...where MAGA zombies need help...now comes the all knowing [b]conspiracy AI[/b]...Ask Elvis")[/i]
[b]Ryan Reynolds Does An Amazing 'Trailer Guy' Voice[/b]
[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt8zekOmcHY[/url]
(...kkkk!)
-
More Praise and Thanks to President Joe Biden...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2911940]BULLETIN: There is nothing Trump or any other Know Nothing, Do Nothing Repub can, will or ever has done to lower the cost of your rent, the cost of your mortgage, the cost of your food or the cost of gas except by way of their favorite and only result for every USA economy the American electorate was careless and foolish enough to allow; Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction by any means necessary or opportunistically available.
Meanwhile, Biden / Dem hard work and legislation can, has and will continue to reduce corporate price gouging costs for Americans whenever and wherever they can:
[B]J&J, Bristol Myers Squibb lose challenges to Medicare drug-price negotiations.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/29/jj-bristol-myers-squibb-lose-medicare-drug-price-talks-challenges.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
Never, never, never expect any Repub to accomplish anything like this for the American people no matter how many empty promises they make to do so over the course of 50 years or more.[/QUOTE]
Another GREAT week for the President BIDEN and hardworking Americans. Here are several more of President BIDEN's accomplishments and deliverables, for hardworking Americans, who don't get $2 Trillion in tax breaks:[LIST]New rule (to take effect in 6 months), will give Americans the ability to get their money back from airlines, when the airlines don't fulfill their flight/travel obligations paid for. An automatic refund will be given, when Americans are entitled to one. [URL]https://www.cnn.com/travel/new-federal-rules-airline-refunds-cash/index.html[/URL][/LIST][LIST]New rule (to take effect in 3 months), would ban and bar "non-complete" agreements, [b]that affect over 30 million Americans,[/b] according to the FTC. Now these employees, have the freedom and the right, to move and work for competing business. FTC says that businesses started using them to keep wages low. One of the most damning examples is in the fast food industry. [URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/04/23/ftc-noncompete-agreements/[/URL][/LIST][LIST]New overtime rule, making millions of new workers, eligible for overtime (OT) under DOL Rule (2). Current ceiling $35,568/yr before OT is cut-off. Beginning July 1st, 2024, the threshold is now raised to $43,888/yr. And gets bumped-up again on Jan 1st, 2025 to $58,656. [URL]https://apnews.com/article/overtime-eligibility-salaried-workers-biden-4bf790961d287794201f13b903fa9119[/URL][/LIST][LIST]The Biden administration, WINS a long standing fight for Americans and Net Neutrality is reinstated, as the FCC votes to restore Net Neutrality. [URL]https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-agency-vote-restore-net-neutrality-rules-2024-04-25/[/URL][/LIST]Four (4) prime examples, w/r to the integral levers of business, that have long hindered employee's paychecks, wages and incomes, suffered by hardworking Americans, who now stand to benefit, from a more equalized work place and growing economy, thanks to BIDEN.
Yes, unlike the [b]"Know Nothing, Do Nothing" Repubs,[/b] in just this last week, President Joe Biden and his administration, has done more for hardworking Americans, than his predecessor ever did, in his 4-years in office.
Thanks, President Biden!
-
Absolutely True
[QUOTE=Spidy;2912211]Another GREAT week for the President BIDEN and hardworking Americans. Here are several more of President BIDEN's accomplishments and deliverables, for hardworking Americans, who don't get $2 Trillion in tax breaks:[LIST]New rule (to take effect in 6 months), will give Americans the ability to get their money back from airlines, when the airlines don't fulfill their flight/travel obligations paid for. An automatic refund will be given, when Americans are entitled to one. [URL]https://www.cnn.com/travel/new-federal-rules-airline-refunds-cash/index.html[/URL][/LIST][LIST]New rule (to take effect in 3 months), would ban and bar "non-complete" agreements, [b]that affect over 30 million Americans,[/b] according to the FTC. Now these employees, have the freedom and the right, to move and work for competing business. FTC says that businesses started using them to keep wages low. One of the most damning examples is in the fast food industry. [URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/04/23/ftc-noncompete-agreements/[/URL][/LIST][LIST]New overtime rule, making millions of new workers, eligible for overtime (OT) under DOL Rule (2). Current ceiling $35,568/yr before OT is cut-off. Beginning July 1st, 2024, the threshold is now raised to $43,888/yr. And gets bumped-up again on Jan 1st, 2025 to $58,656. [URL]https://apnews.com/article/overtime-eligibility-salaried-workers-biden-4bf790961d287794201f13b903fa9119[/URL][/LIST][LIST]The Biden administration, WINS a long standing fight for Americans and Net Neutrality is reinstated, as the FCC votes to restore Net Neutrality. [URL]https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-agency-vote-restore-net-neutrality-rules-2024-04-25/[/URL][/LIST]Four (4) prime examples, w/r to the integral levers of business, that have long hindered employee's paychecks, wages and incomes, suffered by hardworking Americans, who now stand to benefit, from a more equalized work place and growing economy, thanks to BIDEN.
Yes, unlike the [b]"Know Nothing, Do Nothing" Repubs,[/b] in just this last week, President Joe Biden and his administration, has done more for hardworking Americans, than his predecessor ever did, in his 4-years in office.
Thanks, President Biden![/QUOTE]The bumper sticker summation of the supposed Repub economic "policy" of Smaller Government and Lower Taxes has never produced the result of putting more discretionary money into the pockets of ordinary Americans OR small businesses. Never.
Not when you factor in the price of carelessly and foolishly handing the levers of power to Repubs who dangle that mythical Repub goal before dumb suckers' eyes every election; One Great Repub Depression, Great Repub Recession and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction event after another. And, yes, the inevitable notable Inflation that will follow the necessary steps to recover us from those Classic Repeated Repub economic policy results.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2912211]Another GREAT week for the President BIDEN and hardworking Americans. Here are several more of President BIDEN's accomplishments and deliverables, for hardworking Americans, who don't get $2 Trillion in tax breaks:
New rule (to take effect in 6 months), will give Americans the ability to get their money back from airlines, when the airlines don't fulfill their flight/travel obligations paid for. An automatic refund will be given, when Americans are entitled to one. [URL]https://www.cnn.com/travel/new-federal-rules-airline-refunds-cash/index.html[/URL][/LIST][/QUOTE]Wow, a rare one this is a complete winner.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2912211][LIST]New rule (to take effect in 3 months), would ban and bar "non-complete" agreements, [b]that affect over 30 million Americans,[/b] according to the FTC. Now these employees, have the freedom and the right, to move and work for competing business. FTC says that businesses started using them to keep wages low. One of the most damning examples is in the fast food industry. [URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/04/23/ftc-noncompete-agreements/[/URL][/LIST][/QUOTE]I like it, but this has the potential to have businesses less eager to hire.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2912211][LIST]New overtime rule, making millions of new workers, eligible for overtime (OT) under DOL Rule (2). Current ceiling $35,568/yr before OT is cut-off. Beginning July 1st, 2024, the threshold is now raised to $43,888/yr. And gets bumped-up again on Jan 1st, 2025 to $58,656. [URL]https://apnews.com/article/overtime-eligibility-salaried-workers-biden-4bf790961d287794201f13b903fa9119[/URL][/QUOTE]Only affects salaried employees making $35,568? LOL. This is political. Fast food workers are making $40,000 per year now in California. This is a red state business tax. It is a small one because it benefits so few people. Much ado about nothing.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2912211][LIST]The Biden administration, WINS a long standing fight for Americans and Net Neutrality is reinstated, as the FCC votes to restore Net Neutrality. [URL]https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-agency-vote-restore-net-neutrality-rules-2024-04-25/[/URL][/LIST][/QUOTE]Okay, yeah, it is not bad. I like it, but the smell of irony is overpowering. The most pro censorship president since John Adams is saying ISPs cannot use a form of censorship.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2912211]Yes, unlike the [b]"Know Nothing, Do Nothing" Repubs,[/b] in just this last week, President Joe Biden and his administration, has done more for hardworking Americans, than his predecessor ever did, in his 4-years in office.[/QUOTE]Nah, Spidy, you just never heard about things like this Trump did. One of the dumb ones was people who wanted stem cell treatments would get their cells harvested in the USA, they would be grown in the USA, and for completely idiotic reasons, they would fly to Panama, Mexico, or Europe to have them infused. Trump said that was stupid and allowed the stem cells to be infused here.
And look at this CDC headline: Investigation of Presumptive HIV Transmission Associated with Receipt of Platelet-Rich Plasma Microneedling Facials at a Spa Among Former Spa Clients.
Doesn't that make it sound like Platelet rich plasma is evil?
Now get off the headline: [URL]https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7316a3.htm[/URL].
The procedure involves drawing a client's blood, separating the blood into its components of plasma and cells, and using single-use disposable or multiuse sterile equipment to inject the PRP into the face for cosmetic purposes, such as skin rejuvenation and reducing the appearance of acne scars.
Got that? The cure for a medical issue is your own blood and skin rejuvenation is the least that PRP can do. It can be used to repair any tissue in the body. But it is ridiculous that PRP can cause HIV, and yet that is what this headline reads. Here you have a completely in essence free treatment that often does work by the way, and it is being demonized by a federal agency.
South Korea is way, way more advanced than the USA on regenerative and electronic diagnostics and the reason for that is the ridiculous health care bureaucracy.
I don't see either party doing jack shit with that bureaucracy but what we saw with Covid was a lot more Democratic than Republican ass kissing with an awful agency like the CDC.
But this is an issue you and I could come together on but you are too binary and view the world entirely through a partisan lens.
-
Trump two-fisted pump action...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2911779]LOL. Bill Maher is coming around to a guilty verdict in a case so rigged that I said there does not even need to be a trial? Stop the presses. Spidy, you seem to be jerking off to a guilty verdict. You do not need to wait. You can blow your load. It is going to be a guilty verdict.[/QUOTE]
For the record, my staying power, is pretty good...but if I was gonna (hypothetically speaking), I think I'd wait till November, when Trump LOSES! (...kkkk!). Besides, the love fest for Trump is really a MAGA cult, INCEL and winger thing. Jerking off to Trump, is probably like voting for him, for you MAGA cultists. Something you'd know about, waaaaay more than I.
Speaking of jerking-off, I do find the new MAGA/QAnon/white supremacists hand signals, very interesting. You know the one, where Trump, balls-up his hands into two (2) fists, and then pumps them from side-to-side, as if jerking-off two dicks simultaneously! (...kkkk!)
And sometimes he screws-up his face and brings his pumping fists closer to his mouth, like he's actually sucking 2 dicks simultaneously. I'm sure for most of you, MAGA and INCELs types, this is an [b]
"everyday wet dream"[/b], where your dicks, get pumped, by Trumps "crooked hands" (...kkkk!).
Yes...very weird indeed, but nevertheless an interesting way to greet and signal to one another, as part of the brotherhood.
[b]But to be clear,[/b] I've always maintained, I'd just happy to see him get a "good drubbing" in the courts, so more Americans (and people from all around the world) can see what a sleaze ball grifter, charlatan, pussy-grabbing and wanna be dictator, Trump is.
Again, I don't think Trump will see any jail time, [b]even if found guilty[/b]. And if I'm not mistaken, you, Elvis 2008, [u]have proudly stated[/u] on many occasions, it will ONLY boost Trump's [b]"street cred"[/b] amongst the Black voters, and give him a better chance of winning.
So QUIT whining, already!!!
-
Americans can freely laugh again at their President...without the fear of threats!
Biden at Correspondents' Dinner, unleashes his GREAT sense of humor!
[b]Watch Biden's full remarks at the 2024 White House Correspondents' dinner [/b]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4ZfK5ms5M4[/URL]
[b]WATCH: Biden unleashes jabs at Trump during remarks at White House Correspondents Dinner[/b]
[URL]https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-biden-unleashes-jabs-at-trump-during-remarks-at-white-house-correspondents-dinner[/URL]
Refreshing again, to see a president with a sense of humor, that makes you laugh and isn't afraid of laughing at himself.
Thanks, for the laughs Joe!
-
"Sewing Chaos, Fear and Anarchy", the new Repub/RNC 2024 Election Mantra?
Even more so in the 2024 election, do the GOP, QAnon\MAGA Repubs and the RNC, want to attack our democratic voting machinery. Meaning this time around in the 2024 election, they want to sew division, doubt and disdain, by filing even more frivolous litigation and law suits, going after, how votes are counted, tabulated, processed and how elections are going to be ran, according to state bylaws and election procedure manuals.
In three states (AZ, NV, MN), Repubs want to throw out and eliminate [i]the election protection laws/rules that protect election officials.[/i] Apparently, they have the ludicrous belief, that they have a 1st Amendment Right to [b]harass[/b] and [b]intimidate[/b] election officials. (...kkkk!) I guess if that we're true, protesters would equally have the same right to harass and intimidate police officers.
Now, not being able to win the popular vote (and losing by 3 million in 2016, by 7 million in 2020 and [i][...let's speculate for argument sake and say, lose by a projected][/i] 10 million in 2024), means Repubs will simply and literally sew chaos, fear and anarchy, with the goal of gumming up the courts, with frivolous lawsuits, in an attempt to manufacture a win from a free and fair 2024 election, where Trump AGAIN loses the popular vote, by several millions.
[b]Lawsuits over voting in multiple states create shadow war for the 2024 election,[/b] April 21, 2024
[URL]https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2024-04-23/crush-of-lawsuits-over-voting-in-multiple-states-creates-a-shadow-war-for-the-2024-election[/URL]
[QUOTE]Its not a new strategy. But with recent internal changes at the RNC and added pressure from the former president, the legal maneuvering is expected to play an increasingly significant role for the party as Election Day in November approaches. The lawsuits are useful for campaign messaging, fundraising and raising doubts about the validity of the election. ...
This is something that's very important to President Trump, she said. He has said that this is something the RNC should do year-round.[/QUOTE]
If it isn't obvious by now, Trump wants (and [u]can ONLY win[/u]), the 2024 election, by way of [b]"a hockey assist"[/b] from SCOTUS.
-
It would be funny if it wern't so sad
[QUOTE=Spidy;2912448]Biden at Correspondents' Dinner, unleashes his GREAT sense of humor!
[b]Watch Biden's full remarks at the 2024 White House Correspondents' dinner [/b]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4ZfK5ms5M4[/URL]
[b]WATCH: Biden unleashes jabs at Trump during remarks at White House Correspondents Dinner[/b]
[URL]https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-biden-unleashes-jabs-at-trump-during-remarks-at-white-house-correspondents-dinner[/URL]
Refreshing again, to see a president with a sense of humor, that makes you laugh and isn't afraid of laughing at himself.
Thanks, for the laughs Joe![/QUOTE]The CIA has their hands up Senile Biden's Ass and he does whatever they want.
-
Then the CIA Would Be Better POTUSes Than Any Repub Has Ever Been
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2913055]The CIA has their hands up Senile Biden's Ass and he does whatever they want.[/QUOTE]So the CIA Is behind Biden's record high jobs creation, near record consecutive months of unemployment rates below 4%, wage gains, bi-partisan CHIPS and Science legislation, zero Major Repub-style Bear Market declines, multiple All-time Record High Closes in the Broad USA Stock Market, zero Great Repub-style Depressions or Great Recessions, zero Repub-style Massive Jobs Destruction, historic expansion and strengthening the spread of democracy by the addition of 2 NATO Member nations, reversing Trump and Putin's failed attempts to weaken and overthrow democracies and make the world a welcome haven for authoritarian dictatorships, save rather than mass murder millions of people around the world by not laying the groundwork foundation for any opportunistic potential Pandemic virus and lie us into an even worse one after it has predictably spread out of control and on and on and on?
Well, damn, let's give them 4 more years to keep up the good work by spreading the "good news" to loony Biden / Dem-haters that a vote for Biden and his obviously far superior economic and national security results vs any Repub in the past 100 years if not since forever is not really a vote for an "evil" (to America-hating Repubs) Democrat but for a much younger demographic "CIA" instead!
So far, this "CIA" has accomplished more positive economic and national security results for the USA than perhaps any Repub so-called president ever and spectacularly more than any or all of the previous 8+ Repub potuses combined!
-
It would be So Great if
Some of these vax injured people whose lives have been ruined would take up arms and get Street Justice for their misery or perhaps some the survivors of people murdered by the crap vax-.
-
What Fake National Emergency.
Will the CIA and Biden Admin Pull to Stop the election?? Any ideas? Seems like they will do anything to stop DJT.
-
According to what Pathological Liar Trump tells us
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2913338]Will the CIA and Biden Admin Pull to Stop the election?? Any ideas? Seems like they will do anything to stop DJT.[/QUOTE]They'll probably start claiming elections are rigged and that America will be a Bloodbath regardless who wins, either by Trump Repub inconsolable rage and disappointment if Dem Biden hits 270 EVs or by Repub Trump retribution for him finally being forced to face justice for his various crimes if he hits 270 EVs.
That's what Repub Trump has promised anyway.
Oh. You were asking about Dem Biden. Nevermind.
Dems are into democracy because democracy is into them. They like having elections and want every eligible voter's vote to count.
Repubs are not into democracy because, obviously, democracy is just not into them. They really hate elections and would much rather no voter's votes be counted, just hand it ChristoFacist Mike and Moscow Marjorie Taylor Greene to follow Trump's orders for the decision.
-
LOL-- You're Hilarious
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2913264]So the CIA Is behind Biden's record high jobs creation, near record consecutive months of unemployment rates below 4%, wage gains, bi-partisan CHIPS and Science legislation, zero Major Repub-style Bear Market declines, multiple All-time Record High Closes in the Broad USA Stock Market, zero Great Repub-style Depressions or Great Recessions, zero Repub-style Massive Jobs Destruction, historic expansion and strengthening the spread of democracy by the addition of 2 NATO Member nations, reversing Trump and Putin's failed attempts to weaken and overthrow democracies and make the world a welcome haven for authoritarian dictatorships, save rather than mass murder millions of people around the world by not laying the groundwork foundation for any opportunistic potential Pandemic virus and lie us into an even worse one after it has predictably spread out of control and on and on and on?
Well, damn, let's give them 4 more years to keep up the good work by spreading the "good news" to loony Biden / Dem-haters that a vote for Biden and his obviously far superior economic and national security results vs any Repub in the past 100 years if not since forever is not really a vote for an "evil" (to America-hating Repubs) Democrat but for a much younger demographic "CIA" instead!
So far, this "CIA" has accomplished more positive economic and national security results for the USA than perhaps any Repub so-called president ever and spectacularly more than any or all of the previous 8+ Repub potuses combined![/QUOTE]With your Clown World Stats-- Everything is Soooooooooooo. Great!!
-
LOL-- You Serious?
[QUOTE=Spidy;2911712]For those Repubs, and affordable ISG INCEL conspiracists, that just love to fawn all over themselves and cream their pants, when it comes to celebrity endorsements, [b]Howard Stern[/b], [u]may have just sealed the deal[/u]...for a BIDEN win!!!
And hey, look mom, no celebrity flip-flopping, grandstanding, word salad or clever backpedaling, surrounding an ambiguous interview, with [b][i]'misconstrued words'[/i][/b] I said, w/r to my unwavering support for President Joe Biden.
[b]Biden Revisits His Past in Interview With Howard Stern[/b]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/26/us/politics/biden-howard-stern-trump.html[/URL]
In an interview with President Joe Biden, Howard says [u]while he votes [b]Republican[/b] most times[/u], he will not vote for an idiot (in Trump), that wants to destroy DEMOCRACY.
With at peak viewership in late 2019 at around 35 million, that's a [u]big boost[/u] for Biden, [b]among white males.[/b] Howard Stern audience are upscale professionals. 74% of his audience are between 25-54 years of age with an average household income of $160k. 73% Male and 27% female. 34% college graduates, 85% white.[/QUOTE]Howard Who? No one gives a crap about Howard anymore-- he is a Big Joke-- Especially how he hid in his house for 5 years afraid of the covid-.
Howard has lost his clout long ago-.
He had his head up Senile Biden's ass in that interview-.
Here is a great Re-cap.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HM7qH-LUTLw[/URL]
-
Compared to Trump? Yep.
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2913470]With your Clown World Stats-- Everything is Soooooooooooo. Great!![/QUOTE][B]Its the Biden vs. Trump Economy and Hell No, Its Not Even Close.
The facts are clear: Biden has overseen a stronger economy than Trump did. That reality should dominate his reelection.
March 25, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://newrepublic.com/article/180093/biden-trump-economy-election-not-even-close[/URL]
[B]Biden vs Trump on the economy: And the winner is.[/B]
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/biden-vs-trump-on-the-economy-and-the-winner-is-164241570.html[/URL]
Bear on mind, this Mainstream Media overview is every bit as pro Repub "Bothsider" as the rest and therefore promotes the fully debunked Trumpian lie that Trump's Pandemic just "came out of nowhere. Nobody could have predicted or warned about such a thing" when the facts as fully reported contemporaneously are clear; defunding and removing the highly regarded Early Warning / Pandemic Prevention teams that Obama had stationed in those Chinese labs months before the first Covid cases emerged and therefore allowed a likely manageable endemic confined and isolated in one region of China to be converted into the Trump's Pandemic it became WAS Trump's economic and national security policy.
Imagine how much better and stronger Biden's terrific economy would be today if he had inherited the stable and superior economic conditions the Obama-Biden Administration handed Trump instead of the colossal shit-storm of a typical Repub economic disaster Biden inherited from Trump. LOL.
Add to which other factors such as Trump keeping America neck deep in a quagmire of a Repub-initiated War in the Middle East for every minute of every hour of every day of his atrocious so-called presidency vs Biden pulling us out of it in the safest, best organized, least deadly withdrawal of a losing side from an occupied country in the history of modern warfare 3 years ago with zero direct USA Military involvement in any War anywhere on the planet ever since, that whole Trump incitement of a violent, cop-attacking and cop-killing mob of insurrectionists to storm the Capitol in an attempt to overturn a free and fair election and overthrow American democracy as well as Trump's personal involvement in setting up Fake Electors, blackmail and bribe state secretaries into stealing the 2020 election etc and, no question or doubt about it, things are great today compared with what Trump created 4 years ago, 5 years ago, 6 years ago and 7 years ago.
-
As expected, the Repub's / Trump's sucker social issue win is terrible for business
While it will be great for my California rental property income, that California investment would have continued to do very well for me without Trump and his fellow anti Sex For Pleasure ChristoFacist Repubs driving businesses away from Red States well into the future.
I mean, damn, the freeway traffic, restaurant and entertainment venues in my property area are crowded and popular enough already!
[B]Abortion bans drive away up to half of young talent: New CNBC / Generation Lab poll.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/07/abortion-bans-drive-away-up-to-half-of-young-talent-new-cnbc/generation-lab-youth-survey-finds.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Almost two-thirds of younger workers would probably not or definitely not live in a state that banned abortion, a new NBC/Generation Lab survey finds.
These numbers on abortion have gigantic implications for just about every large company in America, said Cyrus Beschloss, the CEO of The Generation Lab.
In the past two years, more than 20 states have either banned or restricted access to the procedure.
......
The youngest generation of American workers is prepared to move away from states that pass abortion bans and to turn down job offers in states where bans are already in place, a new survey from CNBC/Generation Lab finds.
......
"These numbers on abortion have gigantic implications for just about every large company in America, said Cyrus Beschloss, the CEO of The Generation Lab. Companies must know theyll be freezing out or at least scaring a large part of the young talent theyre trying to hire when theyre based in one of these states."[/QUOTE]California and New York were kind of hoping the blessed trend of movement out of our states by Americans who simply can't cut it with regard to income, rent and mortgage payments might finally result in a few deadbeat Red States starting to carry their load in the USA Economy and Federal Revenue.
But I guess that hope has been dashed for now.
-
Ah ok
Ok, this explains RFK Jr's obvious cognitive impairment and memory loss. But those worms must have found their way into Trump's and his supporters' brains as well.
How else to account for their obvious cognitive impairment and bizarre form of amnesia on the important issues of Trump's economic policies and stewardship adding Trillions to the deficit while producing at least a Million fewer jobs with it than without it even before his policies and stewardship laid the groundwork for the earliest Covid cases to spread unreported in secrecy in those Chinese labs, thereby converting a likely manageable endemic confined to one region of China into the deadly, worldwide economy-destroying, supply chain-collapsing, hyper inflation-triggering Trump's Pandemic it became and made even worse by his critical 2020 Year of Lies about it, the 2 Bear Market declines in the broad USA Stock Market on his watch, the severe Recessions in Manufacturing and Agriculture, pre Trump's Pandemic, requiring emergency Welfare Checks to be sent out, the double spike in illegal border crossings and the increase in crime rates on his watch and so on?
It can't all be pawned off as mere America-hating evil, can it?
[B]NYT: RFK Jr. says worm got into my brain and ate a portion of it
May 8, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/08/politics/rfk-jr-mercury-poisoning-brain-parasite/index.html[/URL]
[QUOTE](CNN) Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. experienced a series of health issues in recent years, including an abnormality that he said was caused by a worm that entered his brain and then died, The New York Times reported on Wednesday.
In 2010, Kennedy, now 70, experienced severe memory loss and mental fog, he said in a deposition two years later. According to the Times, he consulted top neurologists familiar with the medical history of his uncle, the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, who had died of brain cancer in 2009. A New York doctor, after reviewing a scan of his brain, told him that his health issues could be caused by a worm that got into my brain and ate a portion of it and then died, Kennedy said in the 2012 deposition, which concerned a divorce from his second wife, Mary Richardson Kennedy. Robert Kennedy said at the time that his earning power had been negatively affected by the cognitive issues, the Times reported.
[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2913554]
Imagine how much better and stronger Biden's terrific economy would be today if he had inherited the stable and superior economic conditions the Obama-Biden Administration handed Trump instead of the colossal shit-storm of a typical Repub economic disaster Biden inherited from Trump. LOL.[/QUOTE]When Biden brought up the term Bidenomics, his poll numbers crashed so badly that he quit using the term. So I don't know who you are trying to convince of anything.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2913554]election etc and, no question or doubt about it, things are great today compared with what Trump created 4 years ago, 5 years ago, 6 years ago and 7 years ago.[/QUOTE]And this is more classic Tooms. The more you are losing on an issue, the more definitive you get on it. I just caught this today. [URL]https://mishtalk.com/economics/where-are-10-year-us-treasury-yields-headed/[/URL].
So has the Biden administration with sponsored inflation in everything he does (excessive fiscal stimulus, poor energy policy, regulatory madness, student loan cancellations, Inflation Reduction Act, tariffs, etc. , all highly inflationary).
If people vote the economy, Biden loses. Period. The only issue he wins on is abortion, and I do not think that is going to work unlike in 2022.
The only other issue Biden was ahead on was "preserving Democracy" which is a talking point Democrats are making over and over again. So there is just this association with them. If the Republicans publicized how Biden was involved with trying to put Trump in jail and is denying secret service protection to RFK Jr. , those numbers would tumble, but it is such a fake issue I do not think Republicans are taking it seriously.
-
Biden's Sponsored Inflation?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2914076]When Biden brought up the term Bidenomics, his poll numbers crashed so badly that he quit using the term. So I don't know who you are trying to convince of anything.
And this is more classic Tooms. The more you are losing on an issue, the more definitive you get on it. I just caught this today. [URL]https://mishtalk.com/economics/where-are-10-year-us-treasury-yields-headed/[/URL].
So has the Biden administration with sponsored inflation in everything he does (excessive fiscal stimulus, poor energy policy, regulatory madness, student loan cancellations, Inflation Reduction Act, tariffs, etc. , all highly inflationary).
If people vote the economy, Biden loses. Period. The only issue he wins on is abortion, and I do not think that is going to work unlike in 2022.
The only other issue Biden was ahead on was "preserving Democracy" which is a talking point Democrats are making over and over again. So there is just this association with them. If the Republicans publicized how Biden was involved with trying to put Trump in jail and is denying secret service protection to RFK Jr. , those numbers would tumble, but it is such a fake issue I do not think Republicans are taking it seriously.[/QUOTE]Did every other country on the planet experiencing post-Trump's Pandemic Inflation also pass historic economic stimulus recovery legislation? Please explain.
The only common denominator all around the world for the economic Disasters of 2020/2021, the massive job losses, business closures, supply-chain collapse and the Inflation that followed was Trump's Pandemic.
You know who loves Bidenomics the most? The Know Nothing, Do Nothing Repub Liars who rush to the ribbon cuttings, grand openings and job creating centers to take undeserved, unearned credit for successful economy-improving projects funded by legislation they didn't propose, design, fight or vote for!
-
As bad as Trump's 2017 - 2020 economic policy results were
It looks like Trump's potential second term economic policy plans are reaching for the Triple or Quadruple Crown of dreaded results as cited over and over again by Wingers here and elsewhere:
[B]Roubini: Trump policies risk higher inflation, slower growth and lower stock and bond prices.[/B]
[URL]https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20240309320/roubini-trump-policies-risk-higher-inflation-slower-growth-and-lower-stock-and-bond-prices[/URL]
[B]How Trumps tariff plans could kill jobs and worsen inflation.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/11/economy/trump-tariffs-trade-jobs-inflation/index.html[/URL]
[B]Trumps Plans for the Fed Would Revive 1970s-Style Inflation.[/B]
[URL]https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/donald-trump-second-term-would-trigger-inflation-surge-by-maurice-obstfeld-2024-05[/URL]
[B]Trump's inflation bomb: How his second-term plans could make it worse.[/B]
[URL]https://www.axios.com/2024/05/08/trump-biden-2024-economy-inflation[/URL]
Bear in mind, as has been the irrefutable pattern for at least the past 100 years, whoever takes over from an outgoing Dem Administration will have nothing serious to "recover" the economy from anyway. Which is the exact opposite of what always faces whoever takes over from an outgoing Repub administration. As was never more dramatically obvious than when the Biden administration took over from the Trump administration.
-
1 photos
Polls Show MSM Pro Repub Spin is Working as Intended
This is how it's done, folks.
A recent WSJ poll as well as others show the typically pro Repub Mainstream Media effort to help demonstrably, irrefutably provable disastrous economic results Repubs win elections on the generally key election issue of the economy is working as well on the perception of their American electorate target marks this time around as usual.
See, the typically pro Repub Mainstream Media's goal is always to repeat Repub (and now Putin / Kremlin) campaign talking points on the economy and their "winning" (but historically always losing and disastrously so) handling of the economy often enough without push back on the actual data, facts and reality, that voters will or might vote against a MSM-encouraged perceived but mythical "bad" economy under Dems even though their own personsl eyes, ears, experience and results wildly refute such a claim:
[B]The Economy Is OK. Bidens Economy, Not So Much.
Today on TAP: Swing-state voters say their own states economy is humming, but the nations economy? Dont ask.
April 4, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://prospect.org/blogs-and-newsletters/tap/2024-04-04-economy-is-ok-bidens-not-so-much/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Just in case you were feeling unaccountably perky yesterday, the release of The Wall Street Journals poll of seven swing states should have brought you suitably down. In the seven states the Journal polled, Biden trailed in six (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania) by between six and one percentage points, while coming in tied in Wisconsin. That these results resemble The New York Times swing-state poll of last November shows that these grim tidings are beginning to settle into concrete.
The concrete isnt fully hardened, of course, and the increasing focus that the Biden campaign and the media are giving to the abortion issue and (in the case of the media, one hopes) what Trump is actually saying still could concentrate enough minds to enable Biden to squeak through. But the Journal polls findings on Americans economic perceptions provide further cause for concern. By a 20-point margin (54 percent to 34 percent), the swing-staters preferred Trump to Biden on the question of handling the economy. [B]Where this really becomes interesting, though, is in their responses to their own states economies.
Asked to assess the condition of the economy in their own state and then in the nation as a whole, respondents in each of the seven states replied that their own states economy was in far better shape than the nations. [/b]Those who rated their own states economy as not so good or poor did so at rates that ranged from 11 points to 33 points lower than their assessments of the nations overall economy. [B]At one level, this shouldnt come as a surprise: It somewhat echoes other recent polls in which Americans have rated their own families economic condition to be notably better than the nation's.[/b]
Neither the swing states actual economic conditions nor the partisan makeup of state government seems to have had much effect on the respondents answers. All but one of the states (Nevada) have rates of unemployment that differ by less than 1 percent from the national unemployment rate. And Democratic Party policy per se doesnt seem to be a cause of discontent:
Four of the states have Democratic governors, and in another (Nevada again), Democrats control both legislative houses, though not the governors office.
[B]That, too, shouldnt come as much of a surprise. The particulars of Bidens economic policies; higher taxes on the rich, re-industrialization, paid sick leave, affordable child care and collegeall poll very well. Its only when the name Biden is attached to peoples assessments of economic conditions that those assessments turn decidedly gloomy.[/b]
I dont mean to discount the widespread discontent over high prices generally, particularly of food, and the systemic unaffordability of housing, health care, child care, and higher ed. I dont mean to discount the fact that the president, any president, is held more accountable for such matters than any state-level official.
But when all that discounting is done, its still apparent that the association of Biden with economic conditions brings down the assessment of those conditions. Biden may yet be able to mitigate this by stressing his support for popular progressive economic policies, and the continuation of the recovery [b](in which his actual record is nothing short of stellar)[/b] may help some, too. But looking at this polling suggests that if hes to defeat Trump, abortion and Trump himself are the themes he most needs to sound.[/QUOTE]See the poll chart below for how typically pro Repub MSM spin has convinced poll respondents that Bidenomics' provably stellar results for the nation's economy failed despite those same poll respondents' awareness of their own state's and their own family's economic situation being wildly opposite:
-
House Votes to Reverse SEC Policy on Crypto Custody
"When I read the President's veto message, I thought he (Biden) is out of sync with the rest of America and doesn't understand the risk of leaving banks out from custody of cryptocurrency. "
[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbrett/2024/05/09/congressmen-discuss-house-vote-to-reverse-sec-policy-on-crypto-custody/?sh=4dae79e155ad[/URL]
Finally, a branch of government has learned how to use its constitutional power to put a check on another branch of government irregardless of party. My hope is that they continue to do the right thing when it comes to crypto policy for the United States of America. Currently the world perception as a view it from afar is that USA is hostile to crypto. Countries are lining up for that business. It will do two things for them, provided economic development and a tool to shore up their own local currencies.
The bet El Salvador made is paying off!
-
TrumpTeeWumpTee Orange MeenieWeenie Nazi--
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2914370]This is how it's done, folks.
A recent WSJ poll as well as others show the typically pro Repub Mainstream Media effort to help demonstrably, irrefutably provable disastrous economic results Repubs win elections on the generally key election issue of the economy is working as well on the perception of their American electorate target marks this time around as usual.
See, the typically pro Repub Mainstream Media's goal is always to repeat Repub (and now Putin / Kremlin) campaign talking points on the economy and their "winning" (but historically always losing and disastrously so) handling of the economy often enough without push back on the actual data, facts and reality, that voters will or might vote against a MSM-encouraged perceived but mythical "bad" economy under Dems even though their own personsl eyes, ears, experience and results wildly refute such a claim:
[B]The Economy Is OK. Bidens Economy, Not So Much.
Today on TAP: Swing-state voters say their own states economy is humming, but the nations economy? Dont ask.
April 4, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://prospect.org/blogs-and-newsletters/tap/2024-04-04-economy-is-ok-bidens-not-so-much/[/URL]
See the poll chart below for how typically pro Repub MSM spin has convinced poll respondents that Bidenomics' provably stellar results for the nation's economy failed despite those same poll respondents' awareness of their own state's and their own family's economic situation being wildly opposite:[/QUOTE]TrumpTeeWumpTee Orange MeenieWeenie Naziman makes me Have PoopiedPants #waaaaahhhh.
-
Same mental problem as Trump?
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2914987]TrumpTeeWumpTee Orange MeenieWeenie Naziman makes me Have PoopiedPants #waaaaahhhh.[/QUOTE][B]Trump's Tongue-tied Dementia Fueled Rant.
Trump's getting worse.[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/05/trumps-tongue-tied-dementia-fueled-rant[/URL]
[QUOTE]"And as you know, I've come here from New York, where I'm being forced to endure a Biden show trial, all done by Biden" Trump whined. [B]"Carried eyt by ret svfeyt ol ben dun."[/b][/QUOTE]Seriously. This cognitive impairment-triggered gobbledygook and verbal incoherence has become a Repub Trumpster Winger-wide phenomenon.
[B]Donald Trump Dementia Evidence 'Overwhelming,' Says Top Psychiatrist.
March 20, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-dementia-evidence-overwhelming-top-psychiatrist-1881247[/URL]
[B]Psychologists make frightening prediction about Trump's cognitive decline and the personality trait that will only get WORSE.
May 13, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13410817/Psychologists-make-frightening-prediction-Trump-cognitive-decline.html[/URL]
[B]Guy On Boardwalk In Jersey Babbling About Hannibal Lecter Says He's Running For President.
Does Donald Trump think the nation has been invaded by cannibals?
May 13, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.wonkette.com/p/guy-on-boardwalk-in-jersey-babbling?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&hide_intro_popup=true[/URL]
Please finalize the Dem and Repub Presidential Nomination process and bring on the debates!
-
A pro crypto presidencial candidate?
Donald Trump is making presidential history all over again: Hes poised to be the first major party nominee to court cryptocurrency traders. Its leaving some Democrats feeling uneasy.
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/10/trump-crypto-biden-00157051[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2914370]That, too, shouldnt come as much of a surprise. The particulars of Bidens economic policies; higher taxes on the rich, re-industrialization, paid sick leave, affordable child care and collegeall poll very well. Its only when the name Biden is attached to peoples assessments of economic conditions that those assessments turn decidedly gloomy.
I dont mean to discount the widespread discontent over high prices generally, particularly of food, and the systemic unaffordability of housing, health care, child care, and higher ed. I dont mean to discount the fact that the president, any president, is held more accountable for such matters than any state-level official.[/QUOTE]So everything good going on in the USA is because of Biden and everything bad is not his fault? LOL. Yeah, that is a Democratic douche line if I have ever heard him.
And higher taxes are good? LOL. They are good for people living on the dole. Anyone actually paying taxes is skeptical the government is going to call them rich and up their tax bill. And paid sick leave? Yeah, that is popular for the people getting it but not the majority having to pick up the slack. Biden has fought industrialization every step of the way. And since when has child care gotten more affordable with Biden? That is news to me.
And of course, Biden's ridiculous budget, printing up money and sending it abroad, and running trillion dollar deficits, and the inflation that it brought with it are not his fault? Yeah, we know from Biden that he thinks excessive government spending does not cause inflation, but his record shows clearly that it does.
The heart of the Texas economy is energy production, specifically oil and natural gas. Outside of Saudi Arabia and Russia, Texas produces more oil than any country in the world. And Biden has made it clear he wants that economy destroyed. Instead of discussing production with American companies, Biden drained the SPR and tried to cozy up to Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. The youtube site liberal hivemind had one time for its meme of the day had two gas stations near the state line, one in Nevada and one in California, with its respective prices. You do not need to guess which one was $6+ a gallon and which was $3+. $6+ a gallon gas is the wet dream of Democrats and Biden has shown it.
So the oil industry boom and reindustrialization, which is mostly happening in Northern Mexico and Southern red states, is happening because businesses are moving production back to the USA and away from China post-Covid because business learned Chinese supply lines were not dependable. The only credit Democrats should take for this is how they exacerbated this issue with their stupid lockdowns. Like with oil hiring, these are typically high carbon producing businesses that Democrats have said that they do not even want.
So I would answer the question the same was as everyone else. The Texas economy is doing fine after 2022. No shit there. The pandemic ended. But at the federal level, things are fucked up. I suspect car insurance is up because of so many illegal immigrants are making claims. The price of eggs and rent is up because of the money printing. Biden's answer to everything is throw money at it.
And now you have the lawfare campaign. OMFG. Using a lying porn star who talks to the dead to try to rig a presidential election? There was at least the illusion of faith that our criminal justice system was fair. That illusion no longer exists. It no longer matters what the rule of law is. All that matters is who the prosecutor and judge are. The smell of that bullshit, which every day shows us that Biden was behind, is not going to go away for decades if ever.
-
No answer?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2915241]So everything good going on in the USA is because of Biden and everything bad is not his fault? LOL. Yeah, that is a Democratic douche line if I have ever heard him.
And higher taxes are good? LOL. They are good for people living on the dole. Anyone actually paying taxes is skeptical the government is going to call them rich and up their tax bill. And paid sick leave? Yeah, that is popular for the people getting it but not the majority having to pick up the slack. Biden has fought industrialization every step of the way. And since when has child care gotten more affordable with Biden? That is news to me.
And of course, Biden's ridiculous budget, printing up money and sending it abroad, and running trillion dollar deficits, and the inflation that it brought with it are not his fault? Yeah, we know from Biden that he thinks excessive government spending does not cause inflation, but his record shows clearly that it does.
The heart of the Texas economy is energy production, specifically oil and natural gas. Outside of Saudi Arabia and Russia, Texas produces more oil than any country in the world. And Biden has made it clear he wants that economy destroyed. Instead of discussing production with American companies, Biden drained the SPR and tried to cozy up to Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. The youtube site liberal hivemind had one time for its meme of the day had two gas stations near the state line, one in Nevada and one in California, with its respective prices. You do not need to guess which one was $6+ a gallon and which was $3+. $6+ a gallon gas is the wet dream of Democrats and Biden has shown it.
So the oil industry boom and reindustrialization, which is mostly happening in Northern Mexico and Southern red states, is happening because businesses are moving production back to the USA and away from China post-Covid because business learned Chinese supply lines were not dependable. The only credit Democrats should take for this is how they exacerbated this issue with their stupid lockdowns. Like with oil hiring, these are typically high carbon producing businesses that Democrats have said that they do not even want.
So I would answer the question the same was as everyone else. The Texas economy is doing fine after 2022. No shit there. The pandemic ended. But at the federal level, things are fucked up. I suspect car insurance is up because of so many illegal immigrants are making claims. The price of eggs and rent is up because of the money printing. Biden's answer to everything is throw money at it.
And now you have the lawfare campaign. OMFG. Using a lying porn star who talks to the dead to try to rig a presidential election? There was at least the illusion of faith that our criminal justice system was fair. That illusion no longer exists. It no longer matters what the rule of law is. All that matters is who the prosecutor and judge are. The smell of that bullshit, which every day shows us that Biden was behind, is not going to go away for decades if ever.[/QUOTE]Still waiting for your explanation for how Biden's historic and stronger than any other country's economic recovery from Trump's Pandemic caused the initial and ongoing Inflation occurring all around the globe.
Next you'll be telling us Hunter Biden's dick pics caused Hamas to ignore Bibi's Wall and commit a terrorist attack on Israel.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2915241]So everything good going on in the USA is because of Biden and everything bad is not his fault? LOL. Yeah, that is a Democratic douche line if I have ever heard him.
[/QUOTE]In that case, can you list all the bad things going on in the US because of Donald Trump then?
-
Donald J Trump 47th President of the USA!!
Sorry to Trigger some dumbAsses here-- DJT shall Be Your Next President-- Get Used to THat. If this post causes you to break down-- Please try do not hurt anyone or yourself--Call 9-1-1.
-
Government produces nothing. Business owners and the people that work for them create the economy. POTUS has nothing to do with economic cycles or progress. Sometime they have a great idea (or copy one from other country) and builds a national highway system or dam that creates infrastructure that allows for greater productivity. Otherwise both parties just rob from those who are actually productive.
-
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2915480]Government produces nothing. Business owners and the people that work for them create the economy. POTUS has nothing to do with economic cycles or progress. Sometime they have a great idea (or copy one from other country) and builds a national highway system or dam that creates infrastructure that allows for greater productivity. Otherwise both parties just rob from those who are actually productive.[/QUOTE]Are not "a national highway system or a dam that creates infrastructure that allows for greater productivity" something valuable that the government is producing? Should you be paying for it through taxes? Please stop with this crazy mythos that the individual business owner can do it all alone. He benefits from the law and order that governments underwrite; an educated workforce that the governments have a hand in producing; a transport network; etc. ,.
-
History refutes that notion
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2915480]Government produces nothing. Business owners and the people that work for them create the economy. POTUS has nothing to do with economic cycles or progress. Sometime they have a great idea (or copy one from other country) and builds a national highway system or dam that creates infrastructure that allows for greater productivity. Otherwise both parties just rob from those who are actually productive.[/QUOTE]President's run on proposals for the economy. When elected, they generally submit many or most of those proposals to Congress as content for economic legislation, tax policy, increased or decreased regulation, government spending, budgets and so on. If those rules, laws and focus on tax dollar spending have no effect on the USA economy, that would be shocking news to virtually every investor and business entrepreneur in the country and a sizable number of them outside the country.
The Democratic Party and the Republican Party have notably different approaches to supporting and encouraging national economic stability and / or growth. Those differing approaches are without exception in modern times proposed, fought for and passed in budgets and legislation by whoever is president. So too is the president's response (or not) to whatever economic problem (or opportunity) looms in the near horizon.
That being the case, it is no wild coincidence, bizarre "economic cycle" or pro Dem / anti Repub magic that every Great Depression, Great Recession and Massive Jobs Destruction and none of the historic opposites of those results in the past 100 years have all occurred under and as a direct response to economic policy and stewardship of Repub presidents while in those same 100 years none of those historic declines have occurred under Dem presidents but only the historic boom times and job gains. And that is regardless whether a prez of each party serves 4 years, 8 years, 12 year or 16+ consecutive years (Harding / Coolidge / Hoover, FDR / Truman, Reagan / Bush1). Therefore, so much for that bizarre "economic cycle" excuse.
The reason is that Repub economic policies and stewardship as exemplified and directed by the Repub potus produces crap results while those of the Dem potus produces far superior results. Practically without so much as a 1 year exception.
Presidents matter. A lot. Anyone who does not think so is certainly welcome to "stand back and stand by" without voting from now on with my blessing even though they don't need it.
BTW, I would not hold my breath waiting for a potential future so-called president Trump to do anything helpful or positive for you or anyone else on this site or in the USA on the matter of crypto or anything else. Unless your name is Putin, Xi, Kim or you are currently serving prison time for storming the Capitol, attacking and trying to kill cops in order to overturn a free and fair election and overthrow American democracy.
He did nothing regarding crypto the last time. That is only an empty Trump campaign "suggestion" or promise made to gin up minority and youth voter support, the demos most interested in the crypto thing.
File it in the same BS folder as him building a wall and making Mexico pay for it, proposing and passing ANYTHING for 4 consecutive years of Infrastructure Week, getting at least 1 net gain job created instead of 1 million fewer jobs created for the $2. 5+ Trillion he added to the deficit with his one and only idiotic Repub tax cuts and jobs act legislation (I assure you a Dem President's policies would have created Millions and Millions of Jobs with higher wages for that $2. 5 Trillion expenditure), that his trade war with China would be great for USA manufacturing and Agro (he had to send them emergency welfare checks just to keep them afloat. As president. Before Trump's Pandemic), and, of course, that highpoint of Trump / Repub presidential economic and national security policy and stewardship campaign promise of being "the greatest job creating president of all time" by defunding and removing the highly regarded Early Warning / Pandemic Prevention teams from those Chinese labs in 2018 and 2019 against dire expert warnings not to do something so dangerous and stupid.
-
Crypto is being talked about at the highest level of politics in USA
[B]Crypto has become a wedge issue[/B] Those politicians on the wrong side of the issue better recognize.
[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/2024/05/12/voters-will-be-heard-billionaire-mark-cuban-issues-stark-warning-to-joe-biden-over-donald-trumps-new-weapon/?sh=7f7dc894548b[/URL]
-
Good one
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2915432]Sorry to Trigger some dumbAsses here-- DJT shall Be Your Next President-- Get Used to THat. If this post causes you to break down-- Please try do not hurt anyone or yourself--Call 9-1-1.[/QUOTE]Red Tsunami, right?
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2915299]Still waiting for your explanation for how Biden's historic and stronger than any other country's economic recovery from Trump's Pandemic.[/QUOTE]Oh stop. You Democratic douches with your "master scientist: Fauci shut down the economy to get Trump out of office, started the economy back up again when cases were at an all time high, created enormous debt, and are like, "Look it how great our economy is. Look at how many jobs we created. ".
You throw people out of work with Trump. They get rehired when Putin ends the pandemic and you all are like, "Look at how awesome we are. ".
No one is buying your bullshit on this or these stupid fucking court cases.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbiFFbxw9e4[/URL]
You think this many people would show off if Biden's economy were with a shit?
Where is Biden's rally like this?
-
As usual
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2915761]Oh stop. You Democratic douches with your "master scientist: Fauci shut down the economy to get Trump out of office, started the economy back up again when cases were at an all time high, created enormous debt, and are like, "Look it how great our economy is. Look at how many jobs we created. ".
You throw people out of work with Trump. They get rehired when Putin ends the pandemic and you all are like, "Look at how awesome we are. ".
No one is buying your bullshit on this or these stupid fucking court cases.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbiFFbxw9e4[/URL]
You think this many people would show off if Biden's economy were with a shit?
Where is Biden's rally like this?[/QUOTE]I'll take that as another, "I can't explain it. It is only BS, really. But I have nothing else to gripe over Biden about" response from you.
Biden's rally? 7 million more people voted for Biden than Trump.
That is more people than showed up in or near (for other reasons) all of Trump's rallies combined since he started having rallies almost a decade ago.
That is also more than the net gain in jobs created by Repub potus' economic policies since the day Lincoln was elected.
I'll take that over anything Trump has done even if it accidentally and most certainly unintentionally benefitted someone other than him, his family and America's enemies and adversaries.
-
The Cmdr has a few points to make and a few questions
[QUOTE=ErsatzJulian;2915533]Are not "a national highway system or a dam that creates infrastructure that allows for greater productivity" something valuable that the government is producing? Should you be paying for it through taxes? Please stop with this crazy mythos that the individual business owner can do it all alone. He benefits from the law and order that governments underwrite; an educated workforce that the governments have a hand in producing; a transport network; etc. ,.[/QUOTE][B]Spoken by a person that has never met a payroll in his life.[/B]
The businessman does not do it all alone. But the fact is the government does not produce anything productive. [B]FULL STOP![/B].
Government only has the ability to reallocate capital confiscated from the hard working businesses and workers. [B]PERIOD[/B].
You are presenting a chicken and egg scenario: Which came first the productive business or the government to tax the productive business?
Basic questions for you: Where does government get the money to do the projects that provide for greater productivity? Why do they do the projects in the first place? Does the government know how to deploy capital better than the average business person? Why is the Social Security System in the (Dis) United States of America not funded with a sovereign wealth fund?
I will rest at this point and allow you to respond.
-
The Cmdr knows there is an exception to every rule
[B]Dwight D. Eisenhower[/B]
He was left off the list of Republican Presidents. I know why. Does not fit the narrative.
I know Biden is hostile to crypto. Trump does not need to be pro crypto. Only needs to rein in the current attack dog at the SEC. Congress has already started to put them in check. A President Trump will have the ability to appoint a head of the SEC or have crypto regulated by another agency. CTFC would be better. They know what they are doing. Crypto is not monolithic. The SEC is currently playing dirty with crypto to support political agendas of the current administration.
The defense rests!
-
Which list was that?
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2915838][B]Dwight D. Eisenhower[/B]
He was left off the list of Republican Presidents. I know why. Does not fit the narrative.
I know Biden is hostile to crypto. Trump does not need to be pro crypto. Only needs to rein in the current attack dog at the SEC. Congress has already started to put them in check. A President Trump will have the ability to appoint a head of the SEC or have crypto regulated by another agency. CTFC would be better. They know what they are doing. Crypto is not monolithic. The SEC is currently playing dirty with crypto to support political agendas of the current administration.
The defense rests![/QUOTE]What list of Republican presidents was that?
Of course, Eisenhower would be on the list of presidents who presided over notable Recessions. Only in his case his economic policies and stewardship did not produce one Great Recession, which is extremely rare for a Repub president. Instead, there were 3 Recessions during his eight year presidency, any two of which combined were greater than the middling one under Truman and the one that barely qualified as a recession under Carter.
Still, he accomplished his economic requirement to garner respect as a Repub president; he ranks dead last on Job Creation among all two term presidents since 1933:
[URL]https://www.statista.com/chart/21137/which-president-created-the-most-jobs/[/URL]
Imagine how atrocious his job creating record would have been if he hadn't been convinced to continue with the FDR New Deal plan to build the Interstate Highway system that was put on hold during WWII. Members of Congress first had to convince him it was a "Defense Department" project and not really a project to create jobs on construction and even more jobs and better USA infrastcture for the future. Otherwise it is doubtful he would have been pulled away from solidifying our full military commitment in word, deed and treaty to waging war in Vietnam to give it much thought.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2915821]I'll take that as another, "I can't explain it. It is only BS, really. But I have nothing else to gripe over Biden about" response from you.
I'll take that over anything Trump has done even if it accidentally and most certainly unintentionally benefitted someone other than him, his family and America's enemies and adversaries.[/QUOTE]You keep wanting to win arguments Tooms. You do not live here. You are thinking the press is against Democrats, and that is why you are a loon Tooms. For those of us in the real world, here was an interview with the executive editor of the NYTimes.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibRnawBs7J8[/URL]
When Ben Smith at Semafor asked Kahn about former Obama official Dan Pfeiffer's complaint that the Times does not "see their job as saving democracy or stopping an authoritarian from taking power," Kahn went ballistic.
"I don't even know how it's supposed to work in the view of Dan Pfeiffer or the White House," Kahn snapped. "We become an instrument of the Biden campaign? We turn ourselves into Xinhua News Agency or Pravda, and put out a stream of stuff that's very, very favorable to them and only write negative stories about the other side? And that would accomplish what?
"There are people out there in the world who may decide, based on their democratic rights, to elect Donald Trump as president," Kahn told Smith. "It is not the job of the news media to prevent that from happening. It's the job of Biden and the people around Biden to prevent that from happening. ".
End of link.
So this whole notion that the reason Biden is not winning on the economy issue because of the press is sheer bullshit. In fact, the press is pushing back. The Biden administration has been bullying the press and they are fucking sick of it.
Biden is no longer a breath of fresh air, a rational alternative to Trump but a senile old guy who is losing his marbles and is a lying, power hungry bully. And you can post all the numbers you want about how great things are, but no one living here believes them.
I don't have to make any case. You do because you are losing on the issue.
-
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2915836][B]Spoken by a person that has never met a payroll in his life.[/B]
The businessman does not do it all alone. But the fact is the government does not produce anything productive. [B]FULL STOP![/B].
Government only has the ability to reallocate capital confiscated from the hard working businesses and workers. [B]PERIOD[/B].
You are presenting a chicken and egg scenario: Which came first the productive business or the government to tax the productive business?
Basic questions for you: Where does government get the money to do the projects that provide for greater productivity? Why do they do the projects in the first place? Does the government know how to deploy capital better than the average business person? Why is the Social Security System in the (Dis) United States of America not funded with a sovereign wealth fund?
I will rest at this point and allow you to respond.[/QUOTE]SC, I agree with you. Also, when I was making fun of your currency arguments, I did not know you were talking crypto.
First off, crypto is often synonymous with bitcoin, and that is a mistake. Most crypto is bullshit but I have kicked the tires on bitcoin, and I cannot see any huge flaws with it.
The reason I was making fun of you on currencies is that JusTK was doing as he always does and bashing the USA and the dollar. Thing is if you look at all the world currencies they are worse than the dollar because the supply of said currency has been increased even more than the dollar. The biggest economy in the BRIC is China, and they have been printing money the likes of which the world has never seen. The Chinese have built so many empty apartments it is up to some crazy number. It was something like they could house everyone in Asia twice. It was something outrageous like that, and price: income ratios for housing in China are the highest in the world. Their economy is set up for an epic collapse.
The other thing the anti-dollar people are always hawking is gold. Platinum is 30 X rarer than gold yet gold has been twice the price of platinum due solely to the hype. So when people hawk gold, I ask why are you not buying platinum instead? And they are so stupid they do not have an explanation, but they think they are geniuses when gold goes up. They think they are smart when in reality they just won a completely random bet.
Thing about bitcoin though is unlike currencies the number of bitcoin are fixed. I think anyone trading in bitcoin is fucking nuts. That is gambling pure and simple. However, if you hold bitcoin as a store of value in case the American economy blows up and as an alternative to the ever increasing number of dollars, that makes sense to me. And if that is what you are doing SC, I apologize for dismissing your notion that you were seeking a viable alternative to the dollar. I thought you were on the team of nuts pushing the Chinese Yuan / BRIC currency thing.
-
Governments don't TAX first...they SPEND first?
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2915836][B]Spoken by a person that has never met a payroll in his life.[/B]
The businessman does not do it all alone. But the fact is the government does not produce anything productive. [B]FULL STOP![/B].
Government only has the ability to reallocate capital confiscated from the hard working businesses and workers. [B]PERIOD[/B]. [/QUOTE]
If by [b]"reallocate capital confiscated"[/b] you mean TAXES, then OK!
When governments issue money, to stimulate work/productivity, it is understood, that TAXES are a necessary mechanism to keep labor and resources engaged/employed in projects and decrease the amount of money in circulation to keep elevated levels of spending and inflation in check.
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2915836] You are presenting a chicken and egg scenario: Which came first the productive business or the government to tax the productive business?
Basic questions for you: Where does government get the money to do the projects that provide for greater productivity? Why do they do the projects in the first place? Does the government know how to deploy capital better than the average business person? Why is the Social Security System in the (Dis) United States of America not funded with a sovereign wealth fund?
I will rest at this point and allow you to respond.[/QUOTE]
After just watching, [i][b]"Finding the Money (2024)"[/b][/i], a documentary on the Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) of economics, I have to wonder, if it would seem, MMT might explain many of your questions?
• MMT Point #1: The Federal Government is the issuer of the currency.
• MMT Point #2: For a currency issuer,...finding the money is [u][b]NEVER[/b][/u] the problem...finding the resources and managing [b]INFLATION[/b] is.
• MMT Point #3: Currency issuers DON'T TAX first...they [b]SPEND[/b] first.
And YES...MMT is often pooh-poohed as [b]"voodoo economics"[/b], by the those on the right, economists like Larry H. Summers and ISG winger economists, but it's gaining traction and is one of the best explanations of how the economy/taxes REALLY functions/works, IMHO!
-
The Cmdr Speaks about Crypto
Personally, I don't give a fuck what the (Dis) United States of America does when it comes to crypto policy. Will not affect me. I have seen the hostility coming for a long time because crypto has the possibility to undermine the reserve currency. That is something the (Dis) United States of America is willing to go to war over. But how do you conduct a war against the entire world (51% attack) who sees the decline happening there and has decided they they need options? How do you conduct war in cyberspace against an unseen, decentralized enemy that exists worldwide.
[B]The users of crypto.[/B]
It does not matter if you think I am right or not. I do not have the blinders on like some people do and look at the (Dis) United States of America from the outside. The world sees what time it is. They are taking steps to protect themselves from the drunken, stumbling giant the the (Dis) United States of America has become. Men living in the (Dis) United States of American cannot even pay for a handjob without risking being put on the news, jail and their reputation. No wonder I hear so many individuals referring to it as a "sex prison".
Why do they want to make algorithmic stable coins illegal? Why do they want to make all stable coins in USD to be backed by USD and have to be insured by a entity approved by the (Dis) United States of America? Fear is why. Fear so intense it makes causes water to drip from their knees. Imagine a world without a political class. Where the people actually go and serve and then return to day to day life as the original founders planned. A mass of individuals is more powerful than the political class. Dumb money! That is the real deal.
Fuck um! I saw this coming like a hanging curve ball where you can see the seams on the ball spinning. I have figured out every legal way to avoid being tracked monitored and otherwise having my freedom impinged upon by individuals so old they cannot even use a smart phone.
Cyberspace is space. A US space force member wrote a thesis that Bitcoin is a weapon. That the (Dis) United States of America risks falling behind in the weapons race in cyberspace if they do not change the direction of current crypto policy. This is not just politics. This is big boy stuff. National Defense. The average person does not understand non-kinetic warfare. It may not be able to kill you directly. But if you are deprived of basic infrastructure see what happens to the society to live in. There is a bridge down in Baltimore. Was it a cyber attack?
No, this is not high minded discussion of policy that the individuals usually engage in. This is real world stuff that most ignore. But that is ok. For one of the first times in my life I have a court side seat at an event of historic change. Crypto has made me a sovereign individual. Opened my eyes. Furthermore it has allowed the great unbanked population to bypass the system. Using crypto I no longer need to ask permission to do anything with my money from anyone. That is a powerful thing. Over look that power at your own peril.
But it does not stop there. Growing interest in gold and silver. People see the fiat money system is on it's last legs. I still need it. Because it is still a fiat world, ATM. But for how much longer? That is an interesting question. Adoption is slow, until it isn't anymore.
-
Thanks again and again and again, Joe
Center-Right Think Tank Discovers Consumer Buying Power is Greater Today Than in 2019.
This research only extended through 2023. With Bidenomics creating even more jobs with even higher wages along with Trump's Pandemic Inflation being tamed even further into 2024, the American Consumers' purchasing power has no doubt increased well beyond Trump's supposedly "ok" economy years even more than the data stated in this report.
Shhh. Don't anybody tell Mainstream Media about this:
[B]Looking At Consumer Purchasing Power since 2019.
May 16, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.aei.org/economics/looking-at-consumer-purchasing-power-since-2019/[/URL]#text=So%2 see%20 overall%2 see%20 the%20 data%20 might, over%20 the%20 past%20 four%20 years.
[QUOTE]The key finding: While households purchasing power generally increased through 2023, the effects varied by income group: The share of income required to pay for the 2019 consumption bundle decreased for all income quintiles, with the highest-income households experiencing the largest decline. In other words, purchasing power increased for all groups. [/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2915912]SC, I agree with you. Also, when I was making fun of your currency arguments, I did not know you were talking crypto.
First off, crypto is often synonymous with bitcoin, and that is a mistake. [b]Most crypto is bullshit but I have kicked the tires on bitcoin, and I cannot see any huge flaws with it.[/b]
The reason I was making fun of you on currencies is that JusTK was doing as he always does and bashing the USA and the dollar. Thing is if you look at all the world currencies they are worse than the dollar because the supply of said currency has been increased even more than the dollar. The biggest economy in the BRIC is China, and they have been printing money the likes of which the world has never seen. The Chinese have built so many empty apartments it is up to some crazy number. It was something like they could house everyone in Asia twice. It was something outrageous like that, and price: income ratios for housing in China are the highest in the world. Their economy is set up for an epic collapse.
The other thing the anti-dollar people are always hawking is gold. Platinum is 30 X rarer than gold yet gold has been twice the price of platinum due solely to the hype. So when people hawk gold, I ask why are you not buying platinum instead? And they are so stupid they do not have an explanation, but they think they are geniuses when gold goes up. They think they are smart when in reality they just won a completely random bet.
.[/QUOTE]The statements you made in bold is 100% correct.
I have come to the conclusion that Bitcoin is one of the best ways to store value for me. Diversification is important. Land, Income producing Real Estate that gives you positive cash flow, a profitable business that gives you positive cash flow, Stocks both growth and dividend; Precious metals all play a part in one's portfolio. But of the items on the list IMO Bitcoin is superior to them all.
Apology accepted.
-
What a difference a week makes....
So last week, while the Dems and President Joe Biden, were hard at work advancing the lives of Americans, by [b]saving[/b] and [b]creating[/b] jobs for Americans, from the likes of House Speaker, Cristofacist Mike Johnson, to creating 2,300 union construction jobs, to 2,000 permanent jobs announced at an AI Microsoft Data Center, in Racine, Wisconsin (WI), clear across the political aisle, [b]"Do Nothing", "Know Nothing" Repubs[/b] ONLY sought chaos and chance to sellout America and take the country backwards in time.
Yes, meanwhile [B]Trump[/B] (aka. Mango Mussolini) and [B]Moscow Marjorie[/B] (aka. Capital Hill Karen, aka. Cruella DeVil on the Hill), were either, selling out America, taking away jobs from Americans (albeit co-conspirators and election deniers) or looked to plunge America back to the dark ages with salacious pledges of porn-star pussy-grabing misogynist state wide abortion bans, followed by similar mass repudiation on automotive EV and green tech, if the oil and gas industry cronies, should pony-up $1 billion in "political contributions" (ah-hmmmm. Bribes!) to Trump's "campaign coffers".
[U]This Week is DJT look alike Clown Week:[/U]
So this week, the short list of Repub candidates, sycophant wannabes and Trump acolytes auditioning for Veep, all lineup as "the friends of Trump" look-alike clowns. All while, making an apparent plea for donations, outside the NYC court house, like some kinda, charity case for wayward billionaire white-collar criminals...PATHETIC!
All ready to demean themselves and denounce the rule of law and the US Justice System, to appease the "gagged" one.
-
Biggest Trump Support Courthouse Crowd Ever!
[QUOTE=Spidy;2916143]So last week, while the Dems and President Joe Biden, were hard at work advancing the lives of Americans, by [b]saving[/b] and [b]creating[/b] jobs for Americans, from the likes of House Speaker, Cristofacist Mike Johnson, to creating 2,300 union construction jobs, to 2,000 permanent jobs announced at an AI Microsoft Data Center, in Racine, Wisconsin (WI), clear across the political aisle, [b]"Do Nothing", "Know Nothing" Repubs[/b] ONLY sought chaos and chance to sellout America and take the country backwards in time.
Yes, meanwhile [B]Trump[/B] (aka. Mango Mussolini) and [B]Moscow Marjorie[/B] (aka. Capital Hill Karen, aka. Cruella DeVil on the Hill), were either, selling out America, taking away jobs from Americans (albeit co-conspirators and election deniers) or looked to plunge America back to the dark ages with salacious pledges of porn-star pussy-grabing misogynist state wide abortion bans, followed by similar mass repudiation on automotive EV and green tech, if the oil and gas industry cronies, should pony-up $1 billion in "political contributions" (ah-hmmmm. Bribes!) to Trump's "campaign coffers".
[U]This Week is DJT look alike Clown Week:[/U]
So this week, the short list of Repub candidates, sycophant wannabes and Trump acolytes auditioning for Veep, all lineup as "the friends of Trump" look-alike clowns. All while, making an apparent plea for donations, outside the NYC court house, like some kinda, charity case for wayward billionaire white-collar criminals...PATHETIC!
All ready to demean themselves and denounce the rule of law and the US Justice System, to appease the "gagged" one.[/QUOTE]LOL. Yeah, those 5-6 Repub numbskulls who showed up at Trump's current criminal trial because they can't get funding for their election campaigns without that dumb sucker Repub hillbilly money Trump controls constituted the biggest crowd of Trump supporters at his trial so far. Despite Trump's plea for his supporters to show up.
Quite a difference when he doesn't stage his blithering, dementia-exposing, droning speeches in locations where a few thousand tourists and day trippers are going to show up anyway.
I say dock the taxpayer dollars pay of those typical deadbeat Repub members of Congress and Governors.
And in case anyone missed it, their secondary goal was to trash America, the American legal system, the Rule of Law, Law and Order, to intimidate, threaten and endanger the Judge, jury, court staff and all of their families. The Classic "tough on crime" Repub agenda.
But at least it was nice of them to admit there are so few problems left to solve in America today thanks to Bidenomics, Biden's border control, national security and so on that they can just fly off to New York on a whim and skip out on whatever the hell they think their jobs are rather than work for their paychecks.
-
Where's Larry?
Up until a year or so ago Harvard economist Larry Summers was the darling of Mainstream Media. On the strength of his momentarily advising Barack Obama during the Obama-Biden Administration's historic economic recovery from the previous Bush2/ Repub admonistration's spectacular "Once in 100 Years" typical and routine Repub colossal economic and national security policy and stewardship results disaster, Summers was eagerly quoted or trotted out onto MSM programming to wax eloquently about how wrong Joe Biden's methods were to solve the spectacular "Once in 100 Years" colossal Trump / Repub economic and national security policy and stewardship results disaster the Biden-Harris Administration inherited.
Therefore, it is puzzling to me why Larry did not show up on any of this weekend's MSM political shows to humbly apologize to the Biden-Harris Administration and to the American people in general for getting it so wrong while they got it so right.
In fact, as of this writing the only results for a Google Search on week old "CBO reports that the American consumer's purchasing power is greater today than it was in 2019", clearly the biggest and most important economic news in a year and the reason several polls have been showing that respondents feel their state and family's economic and financial condition has recovered fine and doing well despite that of the "country" doing poorly, this and the one I posted previously from the center-right think tank American Enterprise Institute are essentially the only media mentions of it at all:
[B]There's more good news on inflation. Americans may have a hard time believing it.
May 17, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20240517207/theres-more-good-news-on-inflation-americans-may-have-a-hard-time-believing-it[/URL]
[QUOTE]Purchasing power for the average household actually increased from 2019 to 2023, a government report found. But higher earners are still coming out on top.
There's some good news on the inflation front - but it's likely to offer little comfort to Americans still smarting from years of high prices.
A new report from the Congressional Budget Office released this week shows that inflation may have had less of an impact on households' bottom lines than months of sticker shock on everything from Big Macs to daycare might suggest.
[/QUOTE]Curious, isn't it? I mean, this non partisan Congressional Budget Office report ought to have been the focus of at least 10-15 minutes of every Sunday political talk program on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, damn, even Fux News. This is a hell of a lot bigger and more historic than whatevrr some numbskull field goal kicker cried about, Trump's latest dozen or so criminal lies or even if Biden tripped on a pebble while walking to his bicycle.
Yet, crickets.
Why, it is almost like Mainstream Media has no interest in reporting truly historic good news about the real state of the Union today if it in anyway can not be spun as a typically pro Repub "Bothsider" argument.
So I can only assume the reason Larry Summers is no longer invited on those programs nor is he even eagerly quoted anymore is because he has served his usefulness as a tool to help Repubs win elections.
-
Inflation is theft and so are taxes
[B]Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics[/B]
That is what the inflation numbers are. Real simple math here people: Inflation target 2%. Actual inflation measured by the numbers they can game: 3%. Missed the target by 33%. Not impressed. When I perform activities in my chosen occupation and private life I cannot afford to be 33% off my target.
They pulled coffee out of the bag of goods because it is up 78%. I have been away from the (Dis) United States of America for a long time. Did the population stop drinking coffee there?
-
Oh no doubt about it
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2916692][B]Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics[/B]
That is what the inflation numbers are. Real simple math here people: Inflation target 2%. Actual inflation measured by the numbers they can game: 3%. Missed the target by 33%. Not impressed. When I perform activities in my chosen occupation and private life I cannot afford to be 33% off my target.
They pulled coffee out of the bag of goods because it is up 78%. I have been away from the (Dis) United States of America for a long time. Did the population stop drinking coffee there?[/QUOTE]Yes, for sure when Trump defunded and removed the Early Warning / Pandemic Prevention Teams from those Chinese labs in 2018 and 2019 against dire expert warnings not to do something so dangerous and stupid, presumably either to flatter his disastrous trade war victor Xi's ego, simply because Obama and Hillary's prints were all over that successful Pandemic Prevention program or all of the above, he was most certainly laying the groundwork for a ton of inevitable recovery inflation theft from you, me, practically everyone on the Planet.
Unless he actually thought the piddling $100 -150 Million costs for it he cut from the budget was a fine trade-off for what he ushered in and exacerbated for America and the rest of the world. He's pretty stupid. So maybe that was all there was to his reasoning for doing it. I have no doubt he would do something that dangerous and stupid again in a New York Minute if the electorate is dumb and careless enough to give him another chance.
But what you are talking about is the removal of coffee from the CPI, where removing and adding items purchased in certain quantities is done all the time.
What these CBO reports are about are are "consumption bundles" of several commonly purchased items that likely add and subtract items that were known to have been purchased routinely in 2019 vs today. It is not merely a copy of what is used to measure CPI, which is not something the CBO determines anyway. I would have to assume a typical "consumption bundle" does not merely consist of giant cans of coffee and only coffee. Otherwise, yeah, the offset by increases in average wages since 2019 would not exceed that increase.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2916163]LOL. Yeah, those 5-6 Repub numbskulls who showed up at Trump's current criminal trial because they can't get funding for their election campaigns without that dumb sucker Repub hillbilly money Trump controls constituted the biggest crowd of Trump supporters at his trial so far. Despite Trump's plea for his supporters to show up.[/QUOTE]Pleas to show up? Trump has a fucking gag order on.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2916163]I say dock the taxpayer dollars pay of those typical deadbeat Repub members of Congress and Governors.[/QUOTE]And you think this trial is not a waste of money?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2916163]And in case anyone missed it, their secondary goal was to trash America, the American legal system, the Rule of Law.[/QUOTE]Rule of law? You dumb Democratic douches cannot even define what the law is.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2916163]But at least it was nice of them to admit there are so few problems left to solve in America today thanks to Bidenomics, Biden's border control, national security and so on that they can just fly off to New York on a whim and skip out on whatever the hell they think their jobs are rather than work for their paychecks.[/QUOTE]Mr. Ladies Man, AKA Soy Boy, the Alinsky method of attacking your opponent where you are weak is not working any more. People are looking at their paychecks buying less and less, sky high rent costs, ridiculous mortgage rates, Biden lying his ass off when he said inflation was 9% under Trump and saying, "I do not believe you" if you look at the polls.
And this trial? I did not think anything could top the Democrat douche policy on Covid, but this is getting there. You have a porn star grifter who owes Trump $500,000 and refuses to pay it (talk about your rule of law right there, soy boy) gets up on the stand and says the polar opposite of what she had previously said six years ago. Hell, she cannot even make up her mind if she had sex, whether it was with consent or not, and my personal favorite, a fucking porn star blacking out while having sex. Of course, Soy Boy, you would probably know a thing or two about that.
And then there is convicted, serial perjurer Michael Cohen who stole $30,000 because he thought he was underpaid. Man, took about the perfect Democratic douche witness. He is slinging the same bullshit as California shop lifters. Hey, it is okay to steal if you think need it.
The judge's daughter is making millions campaigning off the campaign trail, and this POS fucking judge is denying Trump's first amendment rights. The judge sustained objections before Trump's lawyers even fully asked their questions. This case is more rigged than the OJ trial.
Only a true douche like you could be proud of a legal system with those two star witnesses.
Spidy, unlike you and Thailand Tooms who are grifters living off the government dole, I have to live and work in the USA. After this hearing and the porous border, you are talking rule of law? Pristine justice system? You two are fucking nuts.
And before you go on with your latest girlish hissy fit, Oh Elvis what are you complaining about, I am actually happy that this legal abomination has taken place. The only thing better than this rigged trial will be the rigged verdict. If Trump is found guilty, you can pencil him in as our next president.
I can't think of anything better to show everyone how fucked Democrats are in the head than this trial.
-
Uh
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2916929]Pleas to show up? Trump has a fucking gag order on.
And you think this trial is not a waste of money?
Rule of law? You dumb Democratic douches cannot even define what the law is.
Mr. Ladies Man, AKA Soy Boy, the Alinsky method of attacking your opponent where you are weak is not working any more. People are looking at their paychecks buying less and less, sky high rent costs, ridiculous mortgage rates, Biden lying his ass off when he said inflation was 9% under Trump and saying, "I do not believe you" if you look at the polls.
And this trial? I did not think anything could top the Democrat douche policy on Covid, but this is getting there. You have a porn star grifter who owes Trump $500,000 and refuses to pay it (talk about your rule of law right there, soy boy) gets up on the stand and says the polar opposite of what she had previously said six years ago. Hell, she cannot even make up her mind if she had sex, whether it was with consent or not, and my personal favorite, a fucking porn star blacking out while having sex. Of course, Soy Boy, you would probably know a thing or two about that.
And then there is convicted, serial perjurer Michael Cohen who stole $30,000 because he thought he was underpaid. Man, took about the perfect Democratic douche witness. He is slinging the same bullshit as California shop lifters. Hey, it is okay to steal if you think need it.
The judge's daughter is making millions campaigning off the campaign trail, and this POS fucking judge is denying Trump's first amendment rights. The judge sustained objections before Trump's lawyers even fully asked their questions. This case is more rigged than the OJ trial.
Only a true douche like you could be proud of a legal system with those two star witnesses.
Spidy, unlike you and Thailand Tooms who are grifters living off the government dole, I have to live and work in the USA. After this hearing and the porous border, you are talking rule of law? Pristine justice system? You two are fucking nuts.
And before you go on with your latest girlish hissy fit, Oh Elvis what are you complaining about, I am actually happy that this legal abomination has taken place. The only thing better than this rigged trial will be the rigged verdict. If Trump is found guilty, you can pencil him in as our next president.
I can't think of anything better to show everyone how fucked Democrats are in the head than this trial.[/QUOTE]What does a gag order that Trump repeatedly defied have to do with him pleading with his cult followers to show up to protest his criminal trial, which practically none of them did?
[B]Trump urges supporters to go out and peacefully protest ahead of hush money trials opening arguments.
4/22/2024[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4610911-trump-urges-supporters-peacefully-protest-hush-money-trial-opening-remarks/[/URL]
That includes right outside that courthouse. I think somebody counted about 4 showing up one day.
That is when those 5-6 Repub Congressional / Gov / VP Candidate Hopefuls numbskulls showed up to make sure the Judge, jurors, court staff and their families understood that they should not be misled into a state of complacency by the lack of locked and loaded Repub Trump Cultist ready to deliver an "ordinary tourist outing" direct hit on and about their head and shoulders with a blunt instrument and a few Third Reich "selfies" through the brains and limbs of them, their children and their childrens' children anytime after the trial if it does not go the way they want.
Which brings us to the jury's verdict that you seem to be fretting about so much. LOL. Despite the documented evidence so overwhelming there wasn't even a need to examine an eye / ear witness, it will require an unprecedented level of courage, American patriotism and devotion to the Rule of Law for ANY of those jurors to submit a Guilty verdict on the Head of the Trump Crime Family. LOL.
They have seen what Trump and his violent, cop-attacking and cop-killing America-hating cult followers are capable of and will do when and if they don't get their way by any means necessary.
You think any of those jurors are willing to subject themselves, their families and their children to a lifetime of blood lust vengeance from that lot? LOL.
Sleepy Don brings his MAGA Thugs right into the courtroom during the trial. Close enough for the jurors to smell them. Every one of those jurors knows if they submit a Guilty verdict / vote, the Trump Cultists and MAGA Thugs will target them and their families from here to eternity and that any future Repub so-called president will eagerly and happily Pardon and Fully Exonerate each and every one of their murderers and tormentors on day one, freeing them to enjoy a life of Repub Deadbeat luxury on the dumb sucker Repub hillbilly donations from their GubMent Entitlement checks.
I am only ready to be shocked, amazed and filled with admiration for any or all jurors who cast a totally justifiable Guilty verdict. But I am not counting on it. For the above blatantly obvious and well-orchestrated reasons.
But, either way, at least we will have on the record for all time an under Oath and Unchallenged testimony of Classic and Iconic Christian Right Darling Repub Donald J. Trump slurring "You remind me of my daughter" at least three times as he whipped out his mushroom dick to raw dog a porn actress while his latest wife was recovering from giving birth. LOL. Priceless!
-
Biden's Record Stock Market Highs vs. Repub Misogyny
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2916553] ... In fact, as of this writing the only results for a Google Search on week old "CBO reports that the American consumer's purchasing power is greater today than it was in 2019", clearly the biggest and most important economic news in a year and the reason several polls have been showing that respondents feel their state and family's economic and financial condition has recovered fine and doing well despite that of the "country" doing poorly, this and the one I posted previously from the center-right think tank American Enterprise Institute are essentially the only media mentions of it at all:
[B]There's more good news on inflation. Americans may have a hard time believing it.
May 17, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20240517207/theres-more-good-news-on-inflation-americans-may-have-a-hard-time-believing-it[/URL]
Curious, isn't it? I mean, this non partisan Congressional Budget Office report ought to have been the focus of at least 10-15 minutes of every Sunday political talk program on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, damn, even Fux News. This is a hell of a lot bigger and more historic than whatevrr some numbskull field goal kicker cried about, Trump's latest dozen or so criminal lies or even if Biden tripped on a pebble while walking to his bicycle.
Yet, crickets.
Why, it is almost like Mainstream Media has no interest in reporting truly historic good news about the real state of the Union today if it in anyway can not be spun as a typically pro Repub "Bothsider" argument.
So I can only assume the reason Larry Summers is no longer invited on those programs nor is he even eagerly quoted anymore is because he has served his usefulness as a tool to help Repubs win elections.[/QUOTE]Agreed! But I don't think that apology from dear ol' Larry is coming anytime soon however.
Once again, President Biden's economic resilience is proving too much to bear for Larry Summers wannabe economists, MSM and Trump world. With yet another round of new stock market highs, across the board, from S&P 500, Nasdaq, Dow Jones (over 40,000 for first time in history), I have no doubt that a pretty hard pill to swallow for the Repub media propaganda arm over at FOXY Muse.
Yes, from closet INCELS to misogynistic speeches by Kansas City Chiefs field goal kickers (that would have women with PhD and M degrees back in he kitchen, barefoot and pregnant), to Trump waffling and backpedaling on [B]birth control/contraception[/B], it's all to clear, the hateful wingers and the [B]Repub Reich[/B], are coming gunning for women and control of women's bodies.
But to Dems' advantage, the women's vote, continues to be a "blind spot" for Repubs and will definitely be their downfall in Nov 2024 and IMHO, the reason Biden wins.
[B]Note: [/B]Going after birth control and contraception, is also right out of [B]the Neo-Nazi fascist playbook![/B].
-
Trump Classic Projections...Oh no Ivanka?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917063]... You think any of those jurors are willing to subject themselves, their families and their children to a lifetime of blood lust vengeance from that lot? LOL.
Sleepy Don brings his MAGA Thugs right into the courtroom during the trial. Close enough for the jurors to smell them. Every one of those jurors knows if they submit a Guilty verdict / vote, the Trump Cultists and MAGA Thugs will target them and their families from here to eternity and that any future Repub so-called president will eagerly and happily Pardon and Fully Exonerate each and every one of their murderers and tormentors on day one, freeing them to enjoy a life of Repub Deadbeat luxury on the dumb sucker Repub hillbilly donations from their GubMent Entitlement checks.
I am only ready to be shocked, amazed and filled with admiration for any or all jurors who cast a totally justifiable Guilty verdict. But I am not counting on it. For the above blatantly obvious and well-orchestrated reasons. [/QUOTE]
Yet again this week, we see Trump willfully dipping into the [b]Neo-Nazi fascist playbook[/b] and projects the so called claims, that his rivals/opponents were attempting to assassinate him, during the FBI Mar-a-largo documents search, on a day he away from the mansion (...kkkk!).
Meanwhile right-wing MSM and [b]Moscow Marjorie[/b] (aka.Capital Hill Karen, aka.Cruella DeVil on the Hill), are nonetheless all too eager, to spread and gin up these false and ludicrous claims, proving themselves once again, to be Putin and Russia's [i][b]"useful idiots"[/b][/i] once more.
But you have to ask yourself, where was all the hullabaloo and uproar from winger MSM and Moscow Marjorie, when Mango Mussolini, was just making his own resolute arguments about assassinating and murdering his rivals/enemies in legal briefs to SCOTUS and the courts, saying that the US President, has the legal right to send a Seal Team 6, to kill and assassinate?
Yes, the distasteful and disgusting attempts to project and normalize this kind of political violence from right-wing MSM, QAnon\MAGA Repubs, Moscow Marjorie and Mango Mussolini, marches on!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917063]But, either way, at least we will have on the record for all time an under Oath and Unchallenged testimony of Classic and Iconic Christian Right Darling Repub Donald J. Trump slurring [i][b]"You remind me of my daughter"[/b][/i] at least three times as he whipped out his mushroom dick to raw dog a porn actress while his latest wife was recovering from giving birth. LOL. Priceless![/QUOTE] [i][b]"You remind me of my daughter"[/b][/i](...kkkk!) Another classic case of Trump projection. It's not the first time he's made such "mushroom dick-less" projections toward his daughter, Ivanka. Yes, very eerie, grotesque and very very cringy!
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917063]What does a gag order that Trump repeatedly defied have to do with him pleading with his cult followers to show up to protest his criminal trial, which practically none of them did?[/QUOTE]Amazing what happens when you listen to the news sources you do: [URL]https://twitter.com/LangmanVince/status/1793731767654125978[/URL].
And this is the day before in NY when Trump was not around:
[URL]https://twitter.com/i/status/1791945264665600337[/URL]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917063]That includes right outside that courthouse. I think somebody counted about 4 showing up one day.[/QUOTE]You must have learned to count in a California public school.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917063]Which brings us to the jury's verdict that you seem to be fretting about so much. LOL. Despite the documented evidence so overwhelming there wasn't even a need to examine an eye / ear witness[/QUOTE]Right. You are a Democratic douche who believes saving Democracy is convicting an ex-president without even a trial.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917063]Wit will require an unprecedented level of courage, American patriotism and devotion to the Rule of Law for ANY of those jurors to submit a Guilty verdict[/QUOTE]Already giving the jurors an out? LOL. Yes, it is so courageous to find someone guilty of a wrongly documented expense. Given that Cohen and Stormy Daniels and the Judge's daughter have been cashing in on this disgusting political circus masquerading as a trial, sadly, I do not think we are going to get the rigged guilty verdicts that Democrats initially wanted, and the reason is the same with the federal case where there was evidence tampering and in Atlanta with prosecutorial misconduct, and that reason is complete Democrat incompetence.
Anybody who travels knows the USA has an unprecedented number of lawyers, and they have to ban together to justify their existence. They engage in all their sleaze and get away it for one reason, the excuse of protecting their client. So when you have a scumbag like Cohen who tapes and steals from his client, that is against the code. The two lawyers on the jury can say Cohen's lying and theft created reasonable doubt, but unless they are government attorneys who do not have to get clients, they will never get a client again if they excuse a stealing attorney who got caught.
As for "fretting" about the verdict, I was concerned that people would not get how rigged this trial was, but the people got it and then some. A guilty verdict for Trump, and he wins in a landslide. You and Spidy are completely tone deaf to the electorate. Hell, most everyone in the New York area fucked over by the judicial system is pouring in to support Trump, and they are obviously passionate.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917063]Donald J. Trump slurring "You remind me of my daughter" at least three times as he whipped out his mushroom dick to raw dog a porn actress while his latest wife was recovering from giving birth. LOL. Priceless![/QUOTE]When Hunter Biden's laptop showed him doing crack and fucking underage women, you believed the Russians hacked his laptop. Ashely Biden, daughter of Joe, writes in her own fucking diary Joe is showering with her and wrote "probably inappropriate" to describe it, and that is fine in your book.
But you completely believe the porn star who changes her story on a daily basis if she had sex with Trump or not. Yeah, Tooms, you are not fit to be on a jury.
-
1 photos
The GOP attacks its opponents where it is weak. Which means on every important issue.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2917425][b]Trump Classic Projections...Oh no Ivanka?[/b]
Yet again this week, we see Trump willfully dipping into the [b]Neo-Nazi fascist playbook[/b] and projects the so called claims, that his rivals/opponents were attempting to assassinate him, during the FBI Mar-a-largo documents search, on a day he away from the mansion (...kkkk!).
Meanwhile right-wing MSM and [b]Moscow Marjorie[/b] (aka.Capital Hill Karen, aka.Cruella DeVil on the Hill), are nonetheless all too eager, to spread and gin up these false and ludicrous claims, proving themselves once again, to be Putin and Russia's [i][b]"useful idiots"[/b][/i] once more.
But you have to ask yourself, where was all the hullabaloo and uproar from winger MSM and Moscow Marjorie, when Mango Mussolini, was just making his own resolute arguments about assassinating and murdering his rivals/enemies in legal briefs to SCOTUS and the courts, saying that the US President, has the legal right to send a Seal Team 6, to kill and assassinate?
Yes, the distasteful and disgusting attempts to project and normalize this kind of political violence from right-wing MSM, QAnon\MAGA Repubs, Moscow Marjorie and Mango Mussolini, marches on!
[i][b]"You remind me of my daughter"[/b][/i](...kkkk!) Another classic case of Trump projection. It's not the first time he's made such "mushroom dick-less" projections toward his daughter, Ivanka. Yes, very eerie, grotesque and very very cringy![/QUOTE]Clearly, it is the USA Economy-Crashing, the Stock Market-Crashing, the Massive Business and Jobs Destruction and the inevitable Inflation that follows in the necessary recovery, the hatred for democracy, the cop-killing, the incessant whining, crying, griping and poor-me victimhood and, hmm, other personal idiocyncracies that Conservative Repub Christian Nationals love about Trump and his Repub Party the most:
-
3 photos
Trump The 47th President of the UNited States of AMerica in the Bronx!!Das what I Be TawkinBout because! [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50Kx53A4kEI[/URL].
-
This can not happen without MSM making it happen
Nobody should wonder why the demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics' Consensus of carefully selected and timed Polls show Biden and Trump within a 0 to 2. 2 Percentage Point statistical tie for now on the Head to Head, 5-Way and the three decisive Battleground State standings when it obviously should be a blowout for Biden or any other Dem vs Trump or any other Repub at all times.
That just can't happen without typically Pro Repub Mainstream Media "Bothsiders" spinning and twisting reality to make it happen.
[B]Why Do Americans Believe We're In A Recession?
Steve Ratner is puzzled. We're not.[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/05/why-do-americans-believe-were-recession[/URL]
[QUOTE]First, let's point out how little the media has done to dispute this belief -- which is totally a result of hypnotic repetition by the Queens used car salesman. You can't ignore disinformation for years and then credibly say, "Huh, where did that come from?" Morning Joe takes a shot this morning.
"Despite strong economic numbers, new polling finds most Americans believe the country is in a recession. It is not," Willie Geist said.
"In the latest Harris poll conducted for The Guardian, 56% of adults expressed the belief we are in a recession. That includes 67% of Republicans, 49% of Democrats, and 53% of independents. [B]Although inflation has fallen sharply over the past year, 72% of adults still think that is increasing," [/b]he said.
"Willie, it is quite -- excuse me -- an extraordinary poll," said economic analyst Steve Ratner. "We've seen polls before that show americans having a more negative view on the economy. I've never seen one quite like this. These are the numbers you mentioned in your lead-in. Roughly more than half of Americans think we're in a recession. It is divided somewhat by party. More Republicans, 67%, feel it than Democrats, but even Democrats, 49% feel it," he said.
[B]He points out that under Joe Biden, the economy has grown 2.8% a year, which is slightly faster than it was growing under Trump, even before covid hit. So he's mystified.[/b]
"What about this other low unemployment, surging stock market, yet, dot, dot, dot. how do you explain what's going on with the economy?" Geist asked.
Same kind of results, Ratner said.
[B]"Fifty percent of Americans think unemployment is at a 50-year high, 50% think it is at a 50-year high. Unemployment is actually at a 50-year low. It's really amazing.[/b] Unemployment is below 4%. It's been below 4% for months and months now. It's just extraordinary that people think we're at a 50-year high. You can see some of the highs over here," he said.
[B]"Another issue is stocks. Half of Americans think stocks are down this year. Stocks are actually up 11% this year. They're up 45% since Joe Biden took office. Complete disconnect in people's minds between perception and reality of the stock market."[/b]
How the media refuses to acknowledge the effect of Trump's constant claim that the economy is in shambles under Biden is a failure of the media, which hasn't done it's job. The whole "Huh, look at that" reaction is a disgrace.[/QUOTE]Mind you, we're not talking about how these poll respondents "feel. " We're talking about the actual, verifiable data and record. LOL. With its spinning, twisting, failure to push back and factcheck Repub liars in real time and persistent Pro Repub "Bothsiderism", Mainstream Media seeks to keep the disastrous Repub Policy and Stewardship-generated horrific results headlines going for them in every election season.
And that's how you get any poll anywhere at anytime showing so much as a meaningful percentage of respondents "feeling" that the Party responsible for every major downturn and Massive Jobs Destruction of the past 100 years and none of the historic recoveries, expansions and jobs creation (the Repub Party) is better at handling the economy than the Party responsible for every historic recovery, expansion and jobs creation and none of the major downturns (the Dem Party) much less a ridiculous plurality and an even more ridiculous majority.
-
You might need a better phone or computer screen
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2917444]Amazing what happens when you listen to the news sources you do: [URL]https://twitter.com/LangmanVince/status/1793731767654125978[/URL].
And this is the day before in NY when Trump was not around:
[URL]https://twitter.com/i/status/1791945264665600337[/URL]
You must have learned to count in a California public school.
Right. You are a Democratic douche who believes saving Democracy is convicting an ex-president without even a trial.
Already giving the jurors an out? LOL. Yes, it is so courageous to find someone guilty of a wrongly documented expense. Given that Cohen and Stormy Daniels and the Judge's daughter have been cashing in on this disgusting political circus masquerading as a trial, sadly, I do not think we are going to get the rigged guilty verdicts that Democrats initially wanted, and the reason is the same with the federal case where there was evidence tampering and in Atlanta with prosecutorial misconduct, and that reason is complete Democrat incompetence.
Anybody who travels knows the USA has an unprecedented number of lawyers, and they have to ban together to justify their existence. They engage in all their sleaze and get away it for one reason, the excuse of protecting their client. So when you have a scumbag like Cohen who tapes and steals from his client, that is against the code. The two lawyers on the jury can say Cohen's lying and theft created reasonable doubt, but unless they are government attorneys who do not have to get clients, they will never get a client again if they excuse a stealing attorney who got caught.
As for "fretting" about the verdict, I was concerned that people would not get how rigged this trial was, but the people got it and then some. A guilty verdict for Trump, and he wins in a landslide. You and Spidy are completely tone deaf to the electorate. Hell, most everyone in the New York area fucked over by the judicial system is pouring in to support Trump, and they are obviously passionate.
When Hunter Biden's laptop showed him doing crack and fucking underage women, you believed the Russians hacked his laptop. Ashely Biden, daughter of Joe, writes in her own fucking diary Joe is showering with her and wrote "probably inappropriate" to describe it, and that is fine in your book.
But you completely believe the porn star who changes her story on a daily basis if she had sex with Trump or not. Yeah, Tooms, you are not fit to be on a jury.[/QUOTE]LOL. So Trump attracted all of those white people with MAGA hats in the South Bronx for his big push to pull Blacks and Latinos into the World of One "Once in 100 Years" Repub Economic Disaster After Another under Repub policies and stewardship, huh?
LOL. Really. Too funny. Yep, your video does tell us a lot.
BTW, why is that video on Xitter instead of Fux News? Did someone tip off Fux that the video (not in the Bronx, South or otherwise) was of hired actors and Fux did not want to pay another $787 Million fine?
If not, now we know what Deadbeat Numbskulls who think the Unemployment Rate is at a 50 year high and the Stock Market crashed this year do in their spare time.
-
Can't get enough of that
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2917462]Trump The 47th President of the UNited States of AMerica in the Bronx!!Das what I Be TawkinBout because! [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50Kx53A4kEI[/URL].[/QUOTE]Hey, more videos and photos of crowds of white people showing up in the South Bronx as a sign of Trump's success in convincing Blacks and Latinos to vote for another Repub Pandemic, more Repub Closures, another Great Repub Depression, another Great Repub Recession, another Great Repub Market Crash and another Massive Repub Jobs Destruction with more Great Repub Inflation to follow!
Nice.
-
1 photos
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917497]LOL. So Trump attracted all of those white people with MAGA hats in the South Bronx for his big push to pull Blacks and Latinos into the World of One "Once in 100 Years" Repub Economic Disaster After Another under Repub policies and stewardship, huh?[/QUOTE]'Felt very weird': Biden commencement speech splits feelings among Morehouse students, [URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/18/us/video/biden-morehouse-speech-digvid[/URL].
Several Morehouse College students turn their backs on Biden during commencement address. [URL]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/several-morehouse-college-students-turn-their-backs-on-biden-during-commencement-address/ar-BB1mFHDX[/URL].
As for Fox, they did cover the Trump rally. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIk7TJfxkgo[/URL].
As for your imagining there were no blacks or Latinos there, obviously whatever you are smoking in Thailand has gotten in your eyes.
Trump actually got endorsed by black rappers, a very popular Puerto Rican priest and Lawrence Taylor. Of course, you soy boys may not know who that last guy is.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917497]If not, now we know what Deadbeat Numbskulls who think the Unemployment Rate is at a 50 year high and the Stock Market crashed this year do in their spare time.[/QUOTE]Numbskulls huh? What does it say that you are voting for this guy?
White House issues a whopping nine corrections to Biden's NAACP speech transcript. [URL]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-issues-a-whopping-nine-corrections-to-biden-s-naacp-speech-transcript/ar-BB1mQWoS[/URL].
Hell, the NAACP had to pistol whip Steven A. Smith for saying WTF are you Democrats doing nominating this 81 year old guy again?
And then the Italians had the balls to do a comedy routine with Biden nobody dared to here. Woodman, go to the 2:20 mark with this video, it is fucking hilarious.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYYxhL7j37s[/URL]
And my favorite recent meme:
Numbskulls huh?
And the only answer to any of this absolute shit show is: but Trump is worse. That is what you do when you are completely bankrupt of ideas.
-
2 photos
Still no count for the number of Trump Thugs who ever showed up at the courthouse?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2917692]'Felt very weird': Biden commencement speech splits feelings among Morehouse students, [URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/18/us/video/biden-morehouse-speech-digvid[/URL].
Several Morehouse College students turn their backs on Biden during commencement address. [URL]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/several-morehouse-college-students-turn-their-backs-on-biden-during-commencement-address/ar-BB1mFHDX[/URL].
As for Fox, they did cover the Trump rally. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIk7TJfxkgo[/URL].
As for your imagining there were no blacks or Latinos there, obviously whatever you are smoking in Thailand has gotten in your eyes.
Trump actually got endorsed by black rappers, a very popular Puerto Rican priest and Lawrence Taylor. Of course, you soy boys may not know who that last guy is.
Numbskulls huh? What does it say that you are voting for this guy?
White House issues a whopping nine corrections to Biden's NAACP speech transcript. [URL]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-issues-a-whopping-nine-corrections-to-biden-s-naacp-speech-transcript/ar-BB1mQWoS[/URL].
Hell, the NAACP had to pistol whip Steven A. Smith for saying WTF are you Democrats doing nominating this 81 year old guy again?
And then the Italians had the balls to do a comedy routine with Biden nobody dared to here. Woodman, go to the 2:20 mark with this video, it is fucking hilarious.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYYxhL7j37s[/URL]
And my favorite recent meme:
Numbskulls huh?
And the only answer to any of this absolute shit show is: but Trump is worse. That is what you do when you are completely bankrupt of ideas.[/QUOTE]Ok, so the few Blacks and Latinos in that sea of white people bused in from outside the Bronx, maybe from Hooterville and Pixly, were lured there to see a rapper charged with murder hugging the disgraced, twice Impeached and 88 count felony charged Insurrectionist former so-called president.
Maybe that is why those Trump Supporters don't show up outside the courthouse or anywhere else near the judicial system to protest his criminal trials as he pleaded them to do and only show up at the free hats and beer parties at a park.
Well, that certainly speaks more highly of their judgement and awareness than their thinking the Unemployment Rate is at a 50 year high now vs when it hit a near 100 year high under Trump or that the Stock Market is down this year under Biden vs the two Bear Market declines under Trump, one of them just one year after his one $2. 5+ Trillion economic "stimulus" legislation was passed and created a Million fewer jobs with it than without it and the 2nd one after his 2018 and 2019 Trump's Pandemic efforts finally came to fruition.
See, these are just some of the reasons nobody should believe a word out of Trump's mouth or his supporters' mouth or even a photo or video regarding a Trump appearance crowd:
[B]Trump supporters target black voters with faked AI images.[/B]
[URL]https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68440150[/URL]
[B]Photo shows trash left behind after New Jersey Trump rally, but it's from 2020 | Fact check.[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/05/14/image-of-trash-predates-may-trump-rally-by-several-years/73683679007/[/URL]
[B]Photo shows Copacabana Beach concert, not Trump rally.[/B]
[URL]https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.34RJ4RQ[/URL]
[B]You havent seen Biden drawing crowds like trump.. 😂[/B]
[URL]https://x.com/oddemann/status/1792228235519893731[/URL]
-
Will Senile Joe show in June
Calling it Now Senile Fake pres Shit Stained Joe will not show up in June debate or will be so incomprehensible and they shall use this incident to replace him with the scumbag newsome.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917753]Ok, so the few Blacks and Latinos in that sea of white people bused in from outside the Bronx, maybe from Hooterville and Pixly, were lured there to see a rapper charged with murder hugging the disgraced, twice Impeached and 88 count felony charged Insurrectionist former so-called president.[/QUOTE]So now it is name calling and making stuff up. I am not sure if that is better or worse than the but Trump line. You can just start at the 2:18 mark of this video and watch the MSNBC and CNN portion, so we do not have to hear about the Fox news crap. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLQA2BAZ4S0[/URL].
Are you going to trash MSNBC and CNN now as being on Trump's side? LOL.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917753]Maybe that is why those Trump Supporters don't show up outside the courthouse or anywhere else near the judicial system to protest his criminal trials.[/QUOTE]And you are sure they would not be arrested for showing up? Hell, the NYC police strangled a black men for selling loose cigarettes.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917753]Well, that certainly speaks more highly of their judgement and awareness than their thinking the Unemployment Rate is at a 50 year high now vs when it hit a near 100 year high under Trump or that the Stock Market is down this year under Biden vs the two Bear Market declines under Trump[/QUOTE]Rent is up 50% since Biden took office. Gasoline is up 100%. If you have a job like most people do, you do not care about the unemployment rate. If you see Biden flying in illegal immigrants, which he is doing, and Biden is paying their rent and education costs, it is going to piss you off.
And then there is this: So as if overall inflation hadn't hit us hard enough, we in the lower tax brackets the folks who eat fast-food got hit with a 77.4% increase in fast-food prices.
[URL]https://notthebee.com/article/look-how-much-fast-food-prices-have-risen-over-the-past-four-years/[/URL]
And you are telling them how great the economy is?
And this is the exact type woman James Carville is griping about: [URL]https://www.tiktok.com/@chailynt/video/7321085855760649515?lang=en[/URL].
She got made fun of quite a bit for her post, but she was right. Things are much tougher on gen Z because boomers have been such pigs with your retirements.
Can you imagine her seeing all this money going to Ukraine and the illegal immigrants, and Israel, and the only response you and Carville have for her is quit your whining? The economy is good, you stupid beetch. Yeah, that is a winning message. Gee, I wonder why polls are showing Trump picking up steam among young people.
I was talking to someone who is a graduate student going to the same school I did decades earlier. Yeah, it has gone from $600 a year from when I was in school to $30,000 per year now. Technology prices have gone way down. Youtube and digital recordings should have led to massive layoffs in the education industry but no. The education industry is the bread of butter of the Democratic party. No way in hell is this going to be cut back like any other private industry would have been.
And there is no predatory lending in the college arena. Oh, you poor starving students with your worthless degrees, Uncle Brandon is here to just write off your debt and put it on someone else's tab. It does not matter if colleges were overpromising and under delivering, and you were irresponsible.
That kind of shit pissed everyone off who has gotten in debt and paid it off.
But Trump.
Yeah, Tooms, like you better makes some calls to Dominion like 2020. You are going to need a whole lot more of them than last time.
-
Trump is dead already, so he can't be there. The Stable Genius said so.
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2918041]Calling it Now Senile Fake pres Shit Stained Joe will not show up in June debate or will be so incomprehensible and they shall use this incident to replace him with the scumbag newsome.[/QUOTE]No, seriously. The stable genius who knows all the best words and is so rich he will never never never need anyone else's money to run for president so, you know, he can't be bought, told the world he did not escape death when the FBI conducted their standard procedure search of his home while it had been prearranged for him to be 1000 miles away at the time. He admitted that tragic outcome in a fundraiser email where we was begging dumb Repub hillbillies for money from their government entitlement checks:
[B]Trump claims in fundraising email he 'nearly escaped death'.
May 22, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/05/22/trump-claims-in-email-he-nearly-escaped-death-in-fbi-raid/73807576007/[/URL]
BTW, Trump hid from one of the three scheduled debates with Biden in 2020 and from all of the Repub debates this time around. That is how scared shitless he is to be expected to respond intelligently to any serious presidential level question or topic.
Joe Biden will slaughter Trump in a debate. Nobody knows that better than Trump himself. I doubt he will show up for either debate with Biden and certainly not for two.
-
How'd the Bronx suddenly get so white?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2917497]LOL. So Trump attracted all of those white people with MAGA hats in the South Bronx for his big push to pull Blacks and Latinos into the World of One "Once in 100 Years" Repub Economic Disaster After Another under Repub policies and stewardship, huh?
LOL. Really. Too funny. Yep, your video does tell us a lot.
BTW, why is that video on Xitter instead of Fux News? Did someone tip off Fux that the video (not in the Bronx, South or otherwise) was of hired actors and Fux did not want to pay another $787 Million fine?
If not, now we know what Deadbeat Numbskulls who think the Unemployment Rate is at a 50 year high and the Stock Market crashed this year do in their spare time.[/QUOTE]
Yes, that feeble excuse for a rally, was all too funny!
Trumps pretend rally (23-May-2024) in the Bronx, NY, [b]looked awfully white[/b] (...kkkk!), for a NY boroughs that is typically a majority black, brown, Latino and blue voters.
If we're to believe this "fantastic surge" in the polls, w/r to blacks voting for Biden's predecessor, then I think more black people than just Byron [i]"Photoshop"[/i] Donalds (Veep wannabe) and two (2) rappers accused of murder, will need to show up for his fake rallies. (...kkkk!)
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2917692]Trump actually got endorsed by black rappers, a very popular Puerto Rican priest and Lawrence Taylor. Of course, you soy boys may not know who that last guy is.
...
Numbskulls huh? What does it say that you are voting for this guy?
White House issues a whopping nine corrections to Biden's NAACP speech transcript. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...pt/ar-BB1mQWoS.
Hell, the NAACP had to pistol whip Steven A. Smith for saying WTF are you Democrats doing nominating this 81 year old guy again? [/QUOTE] Hey, SAS actually was born and grew up in the Bronx on October 14, 1967. What happened, to SAS speaking at the rally, if he believe the polls about black voters?
Was this the best representation of black and brown voters he could find in the Bronx? A wannabe Veep, 2-rappers on murder charges, a Latin priest and a HOF footballer with too many head concussions and late night Saturday/Sunday morning cocaine binges? If I didn't know any better and by all accounts, it sounds like the start to a bad joke...kkkk!
My oh my...is this want Trump really thinks is representative of black and brown voters, in the Bronx, NY? Is it any wonder NEW YORK hates this dude? Hence the busing of white supporters to a rally in a black and brown district!
-
You are 1000's of days and Trillions of deficit spending dollars late on that.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2918117]So now it is name calling and making stuff up. I am not sure if that is better or worse than the but Trump line. You can just start at the 2:18 mark of this video and watch the MSNBC and CNN portion, so we do not have to hear about the Fox news crap. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLQA2BAZ4S0[/URL]
Are you going to trash MSNBC and CNN now as being on Trump's side? LOL.
And you are sure they would not be arrested for showing up? Hell, the NYC police strangled a black men for selling loose cigarettes.
Rent is up 50% since Biden took office. Gasoline is up 100%. If you have a job like most people do, you do not care about the unemployment rate. If you see Biden flying in illegal immigrants, which he is doing, and Biden is paying their rent and education costs, it is going to piss you off.
And then there is this: So as if overall inflation hadn't hit us hard enough, we in the lower tax brackets the folks who eat fast-food got hit with a 77.4% increase in fast-food prices.
[URL]https://notthebee.com/article/look-how-much-fast-food-prices-have-risen-over-the-past-four-years/[/URL]
And you are telling them how great the economy is?
And this is the exact type woman James Carville is griping about: [URL]https://www.tiktok.com/@chailynt/video/7321085855760649515?lang=en[/URL].
She got made fun of quite a bit for her post, but she was right. Things are much tougher on gen Z because boomers have been such pigs with your retirements..[/QUOTE]Did you actually expect me to be shocked that typically pro Repub Mainstream Media sources like MSNBC and CNN would present an interview of a woman saying "crime is too high" (crime is way down from what Biden inherited from Trump and WAY down from pre 1994 thanks mostly to a Senator named Joe Biden), "the economy is bad" (the economy is better now than under Trump by ANY measure) and "food costs too much" (apparently not for her, she looks very well fed) and some numbskull who thinks rock bottom gas prices during Trump's 20.5 Million Jobs Destruction and Trump's Pandemic Closures where there was no place to drive to anyway is "better" than the roaring Jobs Creation and WIDE OPEN Biden Economy without factchecking and correcting them on the spot for their sake and the sake of their viewers?
LOL. Too late. I have been on to that typically pro Repub MSM scam since the middle of Reagan's 1st term as so-called president.
[B]In May 2019, the Average Price of a gallon of regular gasoline in the USA was $2.90[/B]
[URL]https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=42435[/URL]
[B]Today, the Average Price of a gallon of regular gasoline is $3.59[/B]
[URL]https://gasprices.aaa.com/[/URL]
That is 69 cents more today than in Trump's pre Trump's Pandemic supposedly "best" of his below average economy years. The Manufacturing and Agriculture industries were struggling through a Trump's Disastrous Trade War Recession so bad the Federal Government / Trump was sending those businesses emergency welfare checks just to keep them afloat.
[B]At the depths of Trump's Pandemic Crash in December 2020, the Average Price of a gallon of regular gasoline was $2.22[/B]
[URL]https://fuelsmarketnews.com/eia-gasoline-and-diesel-retail-prices-update-dec-22-2020/[/URL]#text=The%20 national%20 average%20 price%20 for, same%20 week%20 one%20 year%20 ago.
Even if you and the numbskulls featured in those typically pro Repub MSM interviews want to return to the depths of Trump's Pandemic 20.5 Million Jobs Destruction, business and school closures with nowhere to drive to anyway, today's Average Price of a gallon of regular gasoline in the USA is nowhere near 100% higher than it was at the blessed and merciful end of Worst President in History Donald J. Trump's so called presidency.
Your rent is up 50% since January 2021? Then I would suggest you submit a 30 day notice of rental termination to your landlord and move to a cheaper location. Jobs are so abundant and with better wages than ever around the country you should have no problem finding a better one than you have now and affording whatever rent they are charging nearby.
That sure as hell was not the case for anybody in America 4 years ago.
-
Where's Trump, Fux, MSNBC, CNN, Rasmussen, Emerson, Harvard-Harris, etc?
But but but nobody has any money after paying rent, buying gas and eating lunch!
[B]Will 2024 Be the Biggest Travel Boom Year Ever?[/B]
[URL]https://www.travelpulse.com/news/agents/will-2024-be-the-biggest-travel-boom-year-ever[/URL]
[QUOTE]As we enter the latter portion of the first quarter of 2024, advisors are predicting what may be the strongest year the travel industry has ever experienced.
As a company, we are on pace to double our 2023 goals in 2024, said Crafty Getaways Chief Executive Officer Sam Yaffe. Consumers are ready to spend and book with an expert. Our referral bookings are also on pace to double in 2024, as happy customers pass along our information to friends and family.[/QUOTE][B]Memorial Day brings travel boom, in the air and on the road.[/B]
[URL]https://fortworthbusiness.com/business/memorial-day-brings-travel-boom-in-the-air-and-on-the-road/[/URL]
[QUOTE]On Thursday, the TSA screened just under 2.9 million people, coming within about 11,000 of breaking the record set on the Sunday after Thanksgiving last year.
Airports are going to be more packed than we have seen in 20 years, AAA spokesperson Aixa Diaz said.[/QUOTE]Gee, it seems obvious that if Trump, Fux, MSNBC, CNN, Rasmussen, Emerson, Harvard-Harris and every other interested party really wants to find out if a diversified sampling of American demographics feels like they are or are not "better off today than they were 4 years ago in May 2020", they ought to be stationed at the country's domestic and International airports, bus depots, train stations, tourist destinations, etc, etc, etc, aim a news camera and a microphone into the air and simply start asking everyone within shouting distance.
-
The WSJ's inspection of the study agrees; it was and is Trump / Repub Party Inflation
Well folks, thank Donald J. Trump and your local Repub for the post-Free and Fair Election of Joe Biden inflation:
[B]Study suggests Republican panic caused recent inflation.
May 25, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://jabberwocking.com/study-suggests-republican-panic-caused-recent-inflation/[/URL]
[QUOTE]The Wall Street Journal points to a fascinating study today. Three researchers took a look at recent inflation expectations among Democrats and Republicans. Here it is:
See link and dramatic chart here.
Democrats maintained relatively stable inflation expectations the entire time. By contrast, Republican inflation expectations skyrocketed literally on the day Joe Biden won the 2020 electionlong before actual inflation appeared.
But that's not all. The authors say that these inflationary expectations actually turned into inflation:
"We find strong positive and significant effects of inflation expectations on inflation itself.... A one percentage-point increase in 1-year or 5-year inflation expectations [b]lead to a 1.3 or 2.3 percentage point increase in inflation[/b], respectively."
The Journal decided to check this out, and their conclusion is that it seems to be true:
See chart and link to WSJ here.
Every state that voted Republican has high inflation. That's fairly remarkablethough I'd feel more confident in the result if I could see this same analysis for previous elections.
[B]If this study is correct, it means that a great deal of our recent inflationary surge was literally due to Republican hysteria over the election of Joe Biden. In fact, the authors calculate what actual inflation would have been if everyone had instead acted like Democrats:
See dramatic chart here.
They figure that inflation would have topped out around 5% and would currently be at 1.7%.[/b]
I'm not sure what to think about this. The results seem too big to be true, and the authors take some shortcuts that might be iffy. That said, I don't have the econometric chops to evaluate the paper properly. I'd sure like someone else to do it, though. If the paper is right, we're paying a huge price for the Trump/Fox-induced economic panic that continues to infest Republican voters.[/QUOTE]The Wall Street Journal used to be a fairly well-respected source for unvarnished judgements and assessments of economic data, records and reality. Why didn't MSNBC, CNN or, damn, even Fux, which I believe is owned by the same Wingers as the WSJ, refer to this study when they caught and aired the interviews of Trump MAGA members bused in to The Bronx from Hooterville and Pixley complaining about Inflation a few days ago?
Oh, I'm sure we'll see and hear these conclusions about Inflation having been stoked and extended by Repubs and definitely not Dems in every interview of a disgruntled potential voter from now until election day, right? LOL.
From the WSJ link included in the above report:
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/inflation-differs-republican-democrat-states-data-14800c1e[/URL]
[QUOTE][b]Expect high inflation, get high inflation.[/b]
But Binder and her co-authors posit that expectations helped push inflation higher.
The theory that beliefs about inflation matter was cemented following Americas painful experience in the 1970s. The more inflation businesses expect, the more they will raise prices in an effort to get ahead of rising costs. Similarly, workers will demand bigger wage increases if they expect more inflation, pushing labor costs higher.
Fed officials spend a lot of time talking about the importance of keeping inflation expectations anchored to keep prices from spiraling higher. And for Democrats, expectations were in fact anchored, maybe because they bought into the Feds belief that the recent burst in inflation would prove transitory.
But people who didnt believe that narrative, they saw inflation rising and they extrapolated that forward and their expectations rose, said Binder, author of the new book Shock Values: Prices and Inflation in American Democracy. And that in turn kept inflation rising more than it otherwise would have.
In October 2022, when inflation was running hot, Republicans in the Michigan survey said they expected prices to increase by 7.6% over the next year, versus 3.1% for Democrats. Even though inflation has since moderated, the gap remains wide: This months survey showed Republicans expect 4% inflation, compared with 2.2% for Democrats.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2918224]
Your rent is up 50% since January 2021? Then I would suggest you submit a 30 day notice of rental termination to your landlord and move to a cheaper location. Jobs are so abundant and with better wages than ever around the country you should have no problem finding a better one than you have now and affording whatever rent they are charging nearby.
[/QUOTE]I have an idea. Why don't YOU take less in social security and pay for YOUR own health insurance like I do and we take the tax rate to 5%? Or maybe we should tax your wealth by 50% because you are no longer in the country? And seeing as how you are not in the USA, I question why YOU even get to vote.
You are such a typical boomer pig.
-
If the election here held today, Trump or Biden?
I ordinarily would not jump on the polls this far from the actual election. But I wanted to post this before the jury in Trump's current criminal trial renders its verdict and before Biden slaughters Trump in any debate Trump has the balls to show up for.
And it is my opinion and judgement at this early stage where, admittedly, anything can happen over the next few months, that if the election were held today Joe Biden would get 270 Electoral Votes and win his much deserved and well-earned 2nd term as one of the greatest Presidents of all time.
Oh, but Mainstream Media is all abuzz about how Trump is way ahead of Biden in all the polls, including in every battleground state, you say? LOL. Uh, yeah, I know.
Here is my case:
Given that RealClearPolitics is a demonstrably Winger-leaning polling site, my conclusion is even based on RCP's Consensus Poll of Polls on a few decisive factors:
[URL]https://www.realclearpolitics.com/[/URL]
Their Trump vs Biden Head-to-Head Consensus Poll? Trump is currently ahead of Biden 1. 1 point.
Their 5-Way Race Consensus Poll? Trump is currently ahead of Biden 1. 8 point.
Their Electoral College States Map has not changed in weeks or months. Their No Toss-Ups Electoral College States Map has not changed in weeks or months. Their No Toss-Ups EC States Map currently shows Biden only needing to win 3 battleground states in order to hit 270 EC Votes:
Wisconsin? Their Consensus of Polls currently has Trump ahead of Biden 0. 1 point.
Michigan? Their Consensus of Polls currently has Trump ahead of Biden 0. 3 point.
Pennsylvania? Their Consensus of Polls currently has Trump ahead of Biden 2. 3 points. That one is currently the largest Consensus of Polls advantage for Trump on any factor that really matters with regard to either candidate achieving 270 Electoral College Votes and it is still well within a normal +/-MoE statistical tie.
Now, if the election were held today could Biden close the gap and exceed Trump's current 0. 1, 0. 3 and 2. 3 point lead in those three battleground state RCP Consensus Polls? Yes. Imo, easily. It would then be all about the ground game. Of which the Biden campaign has built significant tools for it in those three states while the Trump campaign has not:
[B]Biden is building a behemoth of a campaign. Trump at this point seems to be playing catch-up.
Biden is flush with cash and opening campaign offices across the country, but he has struggled to overcome Trump and his more meager campaign in the polls.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/biden-building-behemoth-campaign-trump-point-seems-playing-catch-rcna145903[/URL]
Sorry, but setting up rally festivals of blithering lies at parks and beach resort areas that typically attract crowds of tourists and day-trippers anyway and then passing out free hats and beer to largely the same deadbeats with nothing better to do bussed in from Hooterville over and over again because they are at least willing to suffer through those lies for an excruciating hour or so, as Trump has been doing, is not an effective "ground game" for getting out the vote on or before election day where it counts.
-
I have a better idea
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2918517]I have an idea. Why don't YOU take less in social security and pay for YOUR own health insurance like I do and we take the tax rate to 5%? Or maybe we should tax your wealth by 50% because you are no longer in the country? And seeing as how you are not in the USA, I question why YOU even get to vote.
You are such a typical boomer pig.[/QUOTE]No, my rental property, stock market investments and Federal taxes contribute way too much positive value to America for me to throw all of that away by not contributing even more meaningful positives with my Democratic Party votes all down every ballot for every election I am registered and qualified to vote in.
Here is a much better idea for the good of America: since it has now been proven that Repub stupidity, emotional instability and votes created Trump's Pandemic, at least a Million American deaths just from that, the massive tens of millions jobs destruction, supply-chain destruction, business and school closures, all of the worldwide economic Disasters and most especially all of the Inflation, higher prices, skyrocketing rents, gas and food prices that followed, how about everyone who voted for anyone other than the Dem on any ballot over the past 10 years just take a break from voting at all and doing anymore historic damage to the country for the next 10 years.
It is the least you could do for America after all the colossal damage you have done to us.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2918146]
My oh my...is this want Trump really thinks is representative of black and brown voters, in the Bronx, NY? Is it any wonder NEW YORK hates this dude? Hence the busing of white supporters to a rally in a black and brown district![/QUOTE]Yeah, Democrats love brown. Or should I say love killing brown.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrMkSN-N0mI&rco=1[/URL]
You know why I want taxes cut? Because I do not want to pay like shit for this or housing illegal aliens or sending money to Ukraine or paying for the mandated and worthless clot shot vaccine. If you are getting government handouts and / or living abroad like you are Spidy, I don't think you should be allowed to vote because the only thing you are going to vote for is taking more of my money for yourself. That is all someone like you cares about.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2918556]Yeah, Democrats love brown. Or should I say love killing brown.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrMkSN-N0mI&rco=1[/URL]
You know why I want taxes cut? Because I do not want to pay like shit for this or housing illegal aliens or sending money to Ukraine or paying for the mandated and worthless clot shot vaccine. If you are getting government handouts and / or living abroad like you are Spidy, I don't think you should be allowed to vote because the only thing you are going to vote for is taking more of my money for yourself. That is all someone like you cares about.[/QUOTE]Do the numbskulls who put together your linked video have anything negative to say about the terrorist organization Hamas waging war against Israel while hiding behind children, in schools and hospitals in Gaza? How about the people of Gaza who apparently never noticed Hamas hiding behind their children, in schools, hospitals, spending years building networks of attack and escape tunnels right under their feet?
Is that ok and abiding by the rules of war according to them?
-
Catch me if you can...says Guiliani
As a kid, Rudy Guiliani, must have really sucked at games like [b][i]"hide-and-go-seek"[/i][/b] (...kkkk!).
The now, decrepit 80-yr old, was trying to play a geriatric version of Leonardo Dicaprio, in his 80th birthday "Tik Tok style" moronic livestream rendition of [i][b]"Catch me if you can"[/b][/i], the Guiliani [i][b]"Nana boo boo...Can't catch me"[/b][/i], version.
Well, it turns out, Guiliani SUCKS at this game too (...kkkk!). If the point was to stay hidden from indictment by the Arizona AG and agent officials, it would behooved Mr. Guiliani, to stay hidden[b]...duh! [/b]
So how dumb are you?...To then broadcast, podcast and livestream online to the world, an 80th birthday video, taunting the Arizona AG, [i]"...come GET me", "...come FIND me"?[/i]
Yeah, no need for any great detective investigation, or need to follow the trail of [i]"bread crumbs"[/i] or a trail of [i]"dripping hair dye"[/i] (...kkkk!). Nope, just wait for the fool to livestream, where he's staying.
[b]Arizona AG Details 'Remarkable' Way They Located Rudy Giuliani To Serve Him[/b]
[URL]https://www.huffpost.com/entry/rudy-giuliani-arizona-ag-served_n_664c6692e4b0bcf02f4796e6[/URL]
Is it any wonder why Trump loves his dumb-ass, corrupt, gullible and unwittingly blind cult lawyers? Especially this big "drip"!
-
2 photos
Speaking of brown and wasting your money on shit...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2918556]Yeah, Democrats love brown. Or should I say love killing brown.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrMkSN-N0mI&rco=1[/URL]
You know why I want taxes cut? Because I do not want to pay like shit for this or housing illegal aliens or sending money to Ukraine or paying for the mandated and worthless clot shot vaccine. If you are getting government handouts and / or living abroad like you are Spidy, I don't think you should be allowed to vote because the only thing you are going to vote for is taking more of my money for yourself. That is all someone like you cares about.[/QUOTE]
In another related affair, Rudy Guiliani, is attempting a bankruptcy [i][b]Java "drip" coffee Fund Raiser.[/b][/i] Yes, Rudy Guiliani, is imploring all you QAnon/MAGA Repubs faithless, to come buy his newly launched bizarro coffee blends, aptly named [i][b]"Rudy Coffee"[/b][/i], for only $29.99 USD.
But wait there's more, Elvis 2008, for a limited time offer, for all you INCEL, misogynists, insurrectionists, Trump-two-fisted hand pumping from side-to-side, [b]jerking-off two dicks simultaneously[/b] election deniers,...you get a commemorative [i]Guiliani "drip" poster[/i] and coffee mug set, along with our newly roasted blend of Rudy [i][b]"drip"[/b][/i] Coffee. (...kkkk!)
{...And right on cue...it doth appears, the "hero" or "snake-oil" remedy to relieve conservatives of their lib woes....for $29.99 usd, ONLY....}
And like any good conservative, what remaining monies you do have control over, is handed over to every, right wing two-bit charlatan, grifter, snake-oil salesmen, fraudster, swindler, cheat and con men, willing to peddle something and anything, that appeals to those [i][b]gullible "conservative sensibilities"[/b][/i], all in the name of good ol' [i][b]"righteous and traditional conservative values".[/b][/i]
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2918556]Yeah, Democrats love brown. Or should I say love killing brown.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrMkSN-N0mI&rco=1[/URL]
You know why I want taxes cut? Because I do not want to pay like shit for this or housing illegal aliens or sending money to Ukraine or paying for the mandated and worthless clot shot vaccine. If you are getting government handouts and / or living abroad like you are Spidy, I don't think you should be allowed to vote because the only thing you are going to vote for is taking more of my money for yourself. That is all someone like you cares about.[/QUOTE]Well, reading your post, I certainly see American schooling did not serve you well, so there is that.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2918705]Do the numbskulls who put together your linked video have anything negative to say about the terrorist organization Hamas waging war against Israel while hiding behind children, in schools and hospitals in Gaza?[/QUOTE]Are my tax dollars going to Hamas?
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2918781]
But wait there's more, Elvis 2008, for a limited time offer, for all you INCEL, misogynists, insurrectionists, Trump-two-fisted hand pumping from side-to-side, [b]jerking-off two dicks simultaneously[/b] election deniers,...you get a commemorative [i]Guiliani "drip" poster[/i] and coffee mug set, along with our newly roasted blend of Rudy [i][b]"drip"[/b][/i] Coffee. (...kkkk!)
And like any good conservative, what remaining monies you do have control over, is handed over to every, right wing two-bit charlatan, grifter, snake-oil salesmen, fraudster, swindler, cheat and con men, willing to peddle something and anything, that appeals to those [i][b]gullible "conservative sensibilities"[/b][/i], all in the name of good ol' [i][b]"righteous and traditional conservative values".[/b][/i][/QUOTE]Guiliani blah, blah, blah, Trump blah, blah, blah. Is this the best you can do?
Is this the best you can do?
All your dumb Democratic douche tactics and Trump is more popular than ever. I cannot wait to see you being so happy when this rigged jury hands out a guilty verdict.
-
Yes, they did
Elvis 2008 asked, "Are my tax dollars going to. Hamas"?
Well, yes, indirectly they did:
[B]For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now its blown up in our faces.
The premiers policy of treating the terror group as a partner, at the expense of Abbas and Palestinian statehood, has resulted in wounds that will take Israel years to heal from.[/B]
[URL]https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/[/URL]
Remember, in terms of spectacularly bad National Security policy and stewardship results, Netanyahu is the "George W. Bush and Donald J. Trump" of Israel. A total disaster.
Unfortunately, the USA support is for Israel, not for whatever colossal fuck up they might stupidly elect. Same as the coalition of USA allies who supported the USA re 9/11 and so on despite America electing that total fuck up, George W. Bush. And when that fuck up Donald J. Trump was appointed so-called president by the Electoral College in 2016.
-
Is the Pussy-Grabber more popular? ...NOT among Women Voters!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2918811]Guiliani blah, blah, blah, Trump blah, blah, blah. Is this the best you can do?
Is this the best you can do? [/QUOTE]
(...kkkk!) Somebody didn't get their [i][b]Rudy "drip" Coffee[/b][/i], this morning. (...kkkk!)
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2918811] All your dumb Democratic douche tactics and Trump is more popular than ever. I cannot wait to see you being so happy when this rigged jury hands out a guilty verdict.[/QUOTE]
Sure, dude sure! Whatever you INCEL, misogynists, insurrectionists, Trump-two-fisted hand pumping from side-to-side, [b]jerking-off two dicks simultaneously[/b] election deniers, wanna tell yourselves, to sleep at nights.
In case you don't remember, this is what [b]"popular"[/b] looks like. Biden wins the 2020 US Presidential Election votes with 81,283,098 votes, which was 7+ million, more than his grifter predecessor.
And in case you still don't remember what [b]"winning"[/b] looks like, Dems have been WINNING (and kicking Repub "ass"), since 2020, for the last 4-years, in 2022, 2023 and 2024 in Primaries and Special Elections, up and down the country and those same fake polls, have gotten these elections results wrong.
So you can follow all the [b]fake polls[/b] you want, telling you Trump is "more popular", until you're Breitbart "Ruby Red" in the face. Again I submit, until the REAL election results are tabulated and shows Repubs and Trump, winning the national popular vote...keep dreaming!
[b]Women Voters Pivotal Role in Electing the Next U.S. President[/b]
[URL]https://www.cfr.org/blog/women-voters-pivotal-role-electing-next-us-president[/URL]
[QUOTE]Women voters will play a pivotal role in determining the outcome of the 2024 U.S. presidential election. [b]Women comprise the largest group of registered voters, and they tend to turn out at high levels to vote, as 68.4 percent of them did in the 2020 election. [/b] The question is, where will women throw their weight? ...
Black and Hispanic women voters provided Biden his winning edge in 2020, as 90 and 69 percent those blocs respectively voted for him. In contrast, Trump still retains the loyalty of a majority of white women, who form the largest single bloc of the electorate at 40 percent, and the largest subgroup of women voters.
But Trumps support could be softening among white women voters given the rising challenges to reproductive rights. Trumps share of the white women vote in 2020 actually increased from 2016, when he garnered 39 percent. However, the recent South Carolina Republican primary indicated that Trump could be losing some of them. [b][u]According to exit polls, a shocking 43 percent of women voted for Nikki Haley, despite the fact that Trump was widely forecast to win that contest by a significant margin[/u][/b] ...
March 21, 2024 2:48pm [/QUOTE]
President Joe Biden's predecessor, won't be as "popular" as you think, especially due to the [u][b]strong "WOMEN'S VOTE"[/b][/u] on abortion bans, for Biden and the Dems, up & down-ballot. The women's vote is definitely a "blind-spot" for Repubs and will be their Achilles' heel.
-
1 photos
Working on the chain!
[B]Gang[/B]! I told you, told you, told you, told you, told you! I said be patient! Time to pay the piper! And folks? We're just getting started with this threat to American democracy! Mark my words!
-
It is a great American tragedy that we could not have Stopped The Steal in 2016
A jury of Trump's peers has found him guilty of falsifying business records to commit election fraud.
If we had been well informed enough to know just how vast Trump's use of Fake News was to push fabricated negative headlines about his political opponent and fabricated positive headlines about himself in the face of almost every American at a grocery store cashier counter, we might have been able to Stop Trump, the Fraud, From Stealing the 2016 Election.
Had Mainstream Media investigative journalists been doing their job better, the American electorate would have known about Trump using Fake News to Steal that election and simply shifted a few votes in 2-3 battleground states.
Consequently, there would have been no Trump's Pandemic, no 1 million Americans dying from it, no millions more other people around the world dying from it, no massive job destruction, business and school closures, supply-chain collapse, hyper-inflation, skyrocketing prices for rent, food and gas, decimation of the travel industry and tectonic negative change in international mongering, no $2. 5+ Trillion added to the deficit for a god awful economic "stimulus" legislation just to buy 1 million fewer jobs with it than without it, no two Bear Market declines in those 4 years, no violent mob of cop-attacking, cop-killing Insurrectionists storming the Capitol to wage combat War Against America, on American soil, in an effort to overturn a free and fair election and overthrow American democracy and on and on and on.
Elections matter.
Presidents matter.
A truly unbiased Mainstream Media not bent on helping Repubs win elections via "Bothsiderism", laziness and a self-serving interest in facilitating more ear and eye-grabbing horrific Repub policy and stewardship results headlines matter.
May god protect those brave and patriotic American jurors, the judge, the court staff and all of their families.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2918997]
In case you don't remember, this is what [b]"popular"[/b] looks like. Biden wins the 2020 US Presidential Election votes with 81,283,098 votes, which was 7+ million, more than his grifter predecessor.[/QUOTE]After this rigged verdict, I don't think anyone is going to believe that any more. Rules are so lax in California they probably will have more votes than voters.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2918997]
President Joe Biden's predecessor, won't be as "popular" as you think, especially due to the [u][b]strong "WOMEN'S VOTE"[/b][/u] on abortion bans, for Biden and the Dems, up & down-ballot. The women's vote is definitely a "blind-spot" for Repubs and will be their Achilles' heel.[/QUOTE]Oh, you mean you believe the polls that show the one favorable demographic for Biden? LOL. God, you are such a douche.
So come back with your Trump is a felon bullshit. Truth is I went on today to donate money to Trump or rather to protest that American voters and not some rigged jury pool and partisan hack judge decide an election, and all his websites have had so much traffic today I cannot get the page to load.
Then I saw this "A GOP source told me that WinRed, the Republican donation platform, is overwhelmed at the moment. " Yeah, no shit.
Yeah, nothing says saving Democracy like jailing your opponent over paperwork.
Yes, by all means, rule of law reigns. Well sort of. Now come the lectures on how justice really works.
As the years-long Trump investigation and prosecution continued, and as New Yorkers continue to deal with rampant crime and theft and felony assaults which they often don't even report due to "the revolving-door criminal injustice system" Trump was pursued with rare intensity. The bodega shopkeepers, facing a shoplifting and armed robbery epidemic which empties their shelves and puts their lives at risk, are besides themselves. As are normal citizens whose safety is at risk daily. If only their interests were political. If only the perpetrator were the Republican presidential frontrunner and not a career criminal then perhaps they would see justice.
In trial, venue matters. It's strategic, it's the selection of a favorable judge and jury. Monsanto is sued in San Fransisco and the jury pours them out for $289 million. Cook County (Illinois) is notorious for high jury verdicts. So too is Philadelphia and Lansing, Michigan. Corporate defendants tremble in fear at being sued in working class cities along the Gulf coast. Texas brings suit against the Biden Administration in the Southern District of Texas Galveston Division because the one federal district judge there (a Trump appointee) will not hesitate to stop unlawful acts or policies. Hawaii brought suit in Honolulu against the Trump Administration and obtained a temporary restraining order against Trump's travel ban from an Obama-appointed judge. He was reversed by the Supreme Court, but that process took over a year.
Bragg brought his case in a Democratic stronghold which voted overwhelmingly for Biden in 2020 (87% Biden to 12% Trump). Bring this case upstate and you might get a different result. The jurors walked into the courthouse with biases against President Trump (so powerful were these prejudices that some prospective jurors lied to try to get selected), and their own political preferences were certainly considered when reaching their verdict. It's human nature. And they followed those biases all the way through to the verdict, ignoring Michael Cohen's perjury his outright lies in court and buying the story from the State that a non-disclosure agreement is a criminal act.
In the show trials, at least the judges tried to hide their bias.
Like I said if there is a guilty verdict, Trump wins in a landslide to save Democracy. This is no longer about Trump. It is about standing up against a rigged system designed to steal power from voters.
-
MeToo!
[QUOTE=TheCane;2919022][B]Gang[/B]! I told you, told you, told you, told you, told you! I said be patient! Time to pay the piper! And folks? We're just getting started with this threat to American democracy! Mark my words![/QUOTE]I also predicted that we'd see the Orange in orange eventually.
It's happening.
-
No ONE is Above the Law!
[QUOTE=The Cane;2919022][B]Gang[/B]! I told you, told you, told you, told you, told you! I said be patient! Time to pay the piper! [/QUOTE]
Yes, you did, tell me! And yes you did say to be patient! Although, at the time you we're preaching to the choir, it was still good to hear, nonetheless.
[QUOTE=The Cane;2919022]And folks? We're just getting started with this threat to American democracy! Mark my words![/QUOTE]Truer words, truer words! Democracy is ALWAYS an ongoing struggle and evolving framework, in which we live and fight for, everyday.
But I'd argue, that the threat to an American Democracy, had already started and has been in "crosshairs" of the QAnon/Repub/MAGA cult and right-wing billionaire conservative Project 2025 insurrectionists, since Jan 6th and before.
Regardless of which way the verdict went...things were only going to get more interesting for American democracy!
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2919039]After this rigged verdict, I don't think anyone is going to believe that any more. Rules are so lax in California they probably will have more votes than voters.
Oh, you mean you believe the polls that show the one favorable demographic for Biden? LOL. God, you are such a douche.
So come back with your Trump is a felon bullshit. Truth is I went on today to donate money to Trump or rather to protest that American voters and not some rigged jury pool and partisan hack judge decide an election, and all his websites have had so much traffic today I cannot get the page to load.
Then I saw this "A GOP source told me that WinRed, the Republican donation platform, is overwhelmed at the moment. " [/QUOTE]Well, a fool and his money.
-
Come on Elvis.
The USGOV takes its citizens worldwide. Does not matter if you are in the country or not. Taxation earns you representation. So, those who are taxed get to vote. Pretty straight forward!
If someone is not in the country, but they are paying tax to the country, they are not using any of the resources or infrastructure of the country. How about that? Now I am certain you were just being sarcastic, but please my bother keep it real!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2918517]I have an idea. Why don't YOU take less in social security and pay for YOUR own health insurance like I do and we take the tax rate to 5%? Or maybe we should tax your wealth by 50% because you are no longer in the country? And seeing as how you are not in the USA, I question why YOU even get to vote.
You are such a typical boomer pig.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2919133]Now I am certain you were just being sarcastic, but please my bother keep it real![/QUOTE]SC, how can I be sarcastic and keep it real at the same time? Yeah, of course, Americans living abroad should not have to pay taxes as they do not pay American taxes, but you have to understand guys like Spidy and Tooms vote to use government to steal money from guys like you and me because they are too cheap to pay for their own hookers.
-
Lol
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2919175]SC, how can I be sarcastic and keep it real at the same time? Yeah, of course, Americans living abroad should not have to pay taxes as they do not pay American taxes, but you have to understand guys like Spidy and Tooms vote to use government to steal money from guys like you and me because they are too cheap to pay for their own hookers.[/QUOTE]Nobody's policies and srewardship stole more money from America and never gave it back in your lifetime than Repub George W. Bush and Repub Donald J. Trump. Lives, jobs, stock market investments, housing values, retirement funds, inflation theft, you name it. All gone and never coming back.
I didn't vote for either one of them.
Did you?
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2919022][B]Gang[/B]! I told you, told you, told you, told you, told you! I said be patient! Time to pay the piper! And folks? We're just getting started with this threat to American democracy! Mark my words![/QUOTE]You told us what? Obviously, you do not see this for what it is. Here is the 6th amendment: In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
If you think this criminal case was constitutional, I want some of what you are smoking. The case was designed to be overturned. It was theater, election manipulation. Biden wanted to be able to call Trump a convicted felon and now he can. That is ALL this was about.
The Secret Service is authorized to use force to protect an ex-president so unless they can be satisfied, and they won't be with anything but a jail with only Trump in it, so you can forget about jail.
Besides the sixth amendment, the judge's instructions went against a prior Supreme Court ruling, so the federal courts can step in any time they want. If Trump is released on bail pending appeal, then they probably will do nothing. If his movements are restricted, that is begging the feds to step in and they probably will and can rule the case unconstitutional and toss the verdict.
Because you Democratic douches are so intoxicated with Trump derangement syndrome, you do not see now that Republican prosecutors can step in, run on criminalizing their opponents, file some bogus charges where they do not even define what law their political opponent has broken, and get a conviction. In fact, if you are a Republican, you would almost be bound to do this.
In reality, this won't happen. The courts will overturn this decision. It will take time. It always does with the legal system but it will happen. That was how this case was designed.
But again, you douches never learn. I cannot tell you how many comments I have read from people who did not even like Trump saying "I did not like Trump but I am voting for him because I do not like what Biden is doing to him. " You guys go off on the twice impeached, 91 counts ETC ETC against Trump and do not get he is rising in the polls. To over half the country now, you have made the words "convicted felon" meaningless. It makes us wonder how many other "felons" have been convicted by lying witnesses.
And wait until the gag order comes off. OMG. Trump is going to turn this conviction into comedy gold. The first thing I would do if I were Trump is bring up someone from New York who has been robbed or had a love one murdered and Bragg let the criminal off. He is going to have fun with what hypocrites you all are with this "rule of law" nonsense.
You douches did the unthinkable with an ex-president billionaire. You made him into a victim.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2919106]Well, a fool and his money.[/QUOTE]Oh I see. In your perverted view of the world, you think everyone agrees with you.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-rakes-35-million-fundraising-haul-after-guilty-verdict[/URL]
"From just minutes after the sham trial verdict was announced, our digital fundraising system was overwhelmed with support, and despite temporary delays online because of the amount of traffic, President Trump raised $34.8 million dollars from small dollar donors," said Trump Campaign Senior Advisors Chris LaCivita and Susie Wiles.
Trump later updated the figure to $39 million during a Friday press conference.
"Not only was the amount historic, but 29.7% of yesterday's donor's were brand new donors to the WinRed platform," they continued. "President Trump and our campaign are immensely grateful from this outpouring of support from patriots across our country. President Trump is fighting to save our nation and November 5th is the day Americans will deliver the real verdict. ".
According to the pair, the fundraising total broke the campaign's previous record for small-dollar donations in a day. Of which 30% donated through the WinRed platform, which is used by Republican candidates for fundraising.
[QUOTE=TheCane;2919022][B]Gang[/B]! I told you, told you, told you, told you, told you! I said be patient! Time to pay the piper! And folks? We're just getting started with this threat to American democracy! Mark my words![/QUOTE]I am sorry, Cane. Did you say Trump was going to rake in $39 million less than 24 hours after a guilty verdict? I must have missed that one. It looks like the piper is not getting paid but fucked up the ass.
Xpartan, the fact that you think it was just me that donated to Trump means YOU are the fool.
I said it before, and I will say it again. This guilty verdict, which you Democratic douches wanted so badly, ensures a Trump victory.
-
From Citizen Trump to Convict Trump...How to unpack a GUILTY verdict?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2919039]After this [b]rigged verdict[/b], I don't think anyone is going to believe that any more. Rules are so lax in California they probably will have more votes than voters. [/QUOTE]
"Rigged", "rigged", "rigged" ...in your own words Elvis 2008, [b][i]"...is that the best you got!"[/i][/b] (...kkkk!), If you haven't gotten the QAnon\MAGA memo by now, [i]"...everything in Trumpland, QAnon and MAGA world is RIGGED!" [/i]
This is what happens when you're FINALLY held to account and held responsible for your criminal actions. [u][b]White collar crime[/b] DO NOT get a pass[/u], because you're some billionaire the CEO of a major crypto company or billionaire CEO of the highest office U.S.A.
Well, I guess the upside is that, dear ol' Trump will finally get an opportunity to really bond and identify more with this black supporters! (...kkkk!)
And to round out the convict ex-Pres. pussy-grabber's journey into the [i]"black experience"[/i], the polls suggest, the best way to accomplish that feat, is with [b]some bling.[/b] Yes, perhaps in the form of matching commemorative [i][b]Trump gold chains, handcuffs[/b][/i] and/or matching [b][i]gold GPS ankle bracelets.[/b][/i] I hear, these are the some of the most envied accoutrements, worn by some of Trump fav rappers on trial, in the criminal justice system. (...kkkk!)
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2919039]Oh, you mean you believe the polls that show the one favorable demographic for Biden? LOL. God, you are such a douche. [/QUOTE] (...kkkk!) That sounds like sore loser talk! Come on man, don't be a sore loser!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2919039]Bragg brought his case in a Democratic stronghold which voted overwhelmingly for Biden in 2020 (87% Biden to 12% Trump). Bring this case upstate and you might get a different result. The jurors walked into the courthouse with biases against President Trump (so powerful were these prejudices that some prospective jurors lied to try to get selected), and their own political preferences were certainly considered when reaching their verdict. It's human nature. And they followed those biases all the way through to the verdict, ignoring Michael Cohen's perjury his outright lies in court and buying the story from the State that a non-disclosure agreement is a criminal act.
In the show trials, at least the judges tried to hide their bias.[/QUOTE] Remember Justice is Blind...right? Much like our greatly venerated SCOTUS?
You, Elvis 2008, are just hilarious! You want to hold everyday hardworking American jurors up to some higher standard of moral justice, biases and prejudices, but when it comes to our highest court that is sworn to uphold our nations laws and blindly and unbiasedly dispatch said laws...you, Elvis 2008, are okay with and vehemently support, a corrupt, right-wing bribed, morally bias, politically bias, upside-down American flag & Appeal to Heaven flag flying 2/3 conservative slanted SCOTUS.
If anything you're certainly consistent in your hypocrisy.
Yeah, and if SCOTUS wasn't 2/3 conservative, ROE v WADE would still be the law of the land and Trump would have already been in jail for the J6 insurrection. I distinctly remember you, Elvis 2008, telling me the same thing, just last week w/r to SCOTUS. Funny what a difference a week makes! (...kkkk!)
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2919039]So come back with your Trump is a felon bullshit. Truth is I went on today to donate money to Trump or rather to protest that American voters and not some rigged jury pool and partisan hack judge decide an election, and all his websites have had so much traffic today I cannot get the page to load.
Then I saw this "A GOP source told me that WinRed, the Republican donation platform, is overwhelmed at the moment. " Yeah, no shit.
Yeah, nothing says saving Democracy like jailing your opponent over paperwork.
Yes, by all means, rule of law reigns. Well sort of. Now come the lectures on how justice really works. [/QUOTE]
Well Elvis 2008, since your having trouble donating more of your dollars to the [i]"Trump-two-fisted hand pumping from side-to-side, [b]jerking-off two dicks simultaneously[/b] election deniers"[/i] fund, may I suggest, the Rudy [i][b]"drip"[/b][/i] Coffee fund? I hear you get a commemorative [i]Guiliani "drip" poster[/i] and coffee mug set. (...kkkk!)
And while you're considering the next Repub Reich grifter's pockets to enrich, may I also suggest, from your list of Repub grifters, you think about who has the cojones, to consider doing what is right for the benefit of the party winning in 2024, now that citizen Trump is now [b]convict Trump[/b]:
[LIST]Now that Trump has been convicted, where are Repubs on having a convicted felon and criminal as their leader?[/LIST][LIST]Repubs can still remove Trump as their elected leader...but will they, come July 15-18, 2024?[/LIST][LIST]Will Repubs step-up and do the right thing and remove the criminal Trump from their ranks?[/LIST][LIST]Will the Repub sycophants resume their subservient position, ON THEIR KNEES, bowing and grovelling to the orange throne, once more? Or take the opportunity to rid themselves of the "Orange Menace"?[/LIST]Since it's plainly obvious that the WOMEN's VOTE is the "Achilles Heel" for Repubs, I think Repubs should re-instate Nikki Haley, as the Repubs best chances of winning. Yes?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2919039]Like I said if there is a guilty verdict, Trump wins in a landslide to save Democracy. This is no longer about Trump. It is about standing up against a rigged system designed to steal power from voters.[/QUOTE]Once again, it sounds like you got your wishes. A GUILTY verdict to ensure the result for a pussy-grabber's "landslide". [b]So why all whining?[/b]
-
Man, Did The US Stock Market Love Those 34 Trump Felony Convictions!
[B]Dow closes more than 570 points higher to post best day in 2024, stocks wrap a winning May.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/30/stock-market-today-live-updates.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
Not only did the US Stock Market love those 34 Trump felony convictions, but I have seen no meaningful change even in the demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics' No Toss Up Electoral College States Map showing Biden only needing to close and surmount a mere 0. 1, 0. 5. , 2. 3 point, statistical tie difference between him and Trump on their Average polls in the only three Battleground states Biden needs to clinch the required 270 EC Votes to continue his leadership as one of the greatest Presidents in history, WI. , MI. , PA.
[URL]https://www.realclearpolling.com/elections/president/2024/battleground-states[/URL]
Which, of course, would be easy to do today with Biden's dramatic advantage on ground game tools already set up in those states while Trump has almost nothing.
It is very, very likely that Joe Biden would win the election if it were held today. Been that way for many weeks really. Well before Biden slaughters Trump in any debate that Trump can't find a basement Men's Room toilet to hide from and will only go full Captain Queeg in response to any question on a presidential level topic in any fair setting.
You know, the reason his lawyers in every civil or criminal trial practically tackles him to the floor to prevent him from testifying under Oath about anything as simple as what day it is, is this a photo of your wife, when did WWII happen, did you run against Barack Obama or George W. Bush in a previous election, was the Air Force involved in the Revolutionary War and so on.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2919175]SC, how can I be sarcastic and keep it real at the same time? Yeah, of course, Americans living abroad should not have to pay taxes as they do not pay American taxes, but you have to understand guys like Spidy and Tooms vote to use government to steal money from guys like you and me because they are too cheap to pay for their own hookers.[/QUOTE]You killing me brother. ROTFLAO! All humor is based in truth. Otherwise it wouldn't be funny. I get your point. It is not the taxes so much. I get the advantages of the blue passport and the USD. I don't like to pay taxes but it is what it is. After I learn about money my biggest question has been: "If USGOV can just print more of it out of thin air why do the need my money?" LOL!
I think we should decide who gets elected in the ballot box not the courtroom. I think the pursuit of Trump in the court system shows the decline of the (Dis) United States of America. Makes the place no different from other countries that USGOV is often critical. I vote my own personal self interests. So I am a one issue voter this election cycle: Crypto. Although I also happen to believe crypto current is and will continue to be a critical part of the economy in the USA. It should not be feared by USGOV but embraced. Peer to Peer transactions cannot be stopped. Crypto is as basic as the old trading post of the gold rush days. Just in a new digital form.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2919255]Oh I see. In your perverted view of the world, you think everyone agrees with you.[/QUOTE]What? Why?
All I'm saying is this:
- 12 jurors found your idol guilty on every single count.
- there is no way some of these jurors aren't republicans and even trumpists.
- and yet, they agreed on the guilty verdict [B]on the second day of deliberation[/B] -- forced to agree -- because the prosecution proved their case beyond reasonable doubt.
- which means (and I'm deeply sorry to have to say this to you) that everyone who honestly believes in "rigged", are not exactly the sharpest tools in the box.
I hope you've managed to get through and send your money successfully.
-
2 photos
OMG. Now the 34 times Convicted Felon is begging ME for money! LOL
Today I got 3, count 'them, 3 emails from the self-described multi-billionaire who will never ask anyone for money, begging me to give him money or "We will lose our country"!
Lolol. Uh. No, I am not such a pathetic sucker that I'm going to give money to The Worst (former) President in History so he can identify, embrace and exacerbate another Repub "Once in 100 Years Disaster" that will again and again and again wipe out millions of jobs, crash the economy, shut down businesses and skyrocket inflation on the desperate but necessary recovery.
Enough already. Never. Nobody is that good a conman, certainly not ridiculous Donald J. Trump. You've got to be kidding me. LOL.
-
Why not doo it like Trumpel friend Kim or Putin would do it?
In reality, this won't happen. The courts will overturn this decision. It will take time. It always does with the legal system but it will happen. That was how this case was designed.
Yes it was designed by Trumpel - delay delay. There is only 1 Way against Gangsters like Tump - Putin / Kim can explain you!
Trump is going to turn this conviction into comedy gold.
You forget that not all Americans are crazy MAGA. There are at least 53% against this Criminal.
-
1 photos
He's going to need it!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2919255]I am sorry, Cane. Did you say Trump was going to rake in $39 million less than 24 hours after a guilty verdict? I must have missed that one. It looks like the piper is not getting paid but fucked up the ass.[/QUOTE]To pay his legal bills LOL! And he better hope his lawyers do a better job the next time lest he too end up on Rikers Island getting fucked in the ass like his boy Weisselberg! LMAO!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2919268]Once again, it sounds like you got your wishes. A GUILTY verdict to ensure the result for a pussy-grabber's "landslide". So why all whining?[/QUOTE]Spidy, your primary focus in life is having a government stealing money from hard working people to send to you so you can fuck women. That is not me. I work and pay my own way. I also see that the government you so love can turn against you.
On the Republican side, we were prepped for this verdict. It was not a shock. It was sadness. Our brains knew this verdicts were going this way. Our hearts and emotions wanted to believe though that this travesty of justice would not happen.
As a monger, you must be living in a bubble. You must not meet any crazy women. So in this case when a woman says she had consensual sex with you one time, then signs a statement saying she did not, and then says you raped her, we should believe you raped. And the fact that she has a verdict against you for $500,000 and admits on the stand she is never going to pay it does not constitute reasonable doubt.
I had to listen to this nonsense from Tooms about how he is a law abiding citizen. He is so delusional he wants a fellow monger to believe he was only seeing hookers in countries where it was legal. Ha! And now with you, Soy Boy, you are in the imaginary bubble where the police love you and would never charge you and all the hookers are sane. Well, I think by now, we all know how delusional you two are.
Soy boy, a tool like you said we should believe all women even porn actresses. So which version of events from Stormy Daniels are we supposed to believe?
-
10% of Registered Repubs in this poll claim they will not vote for Trump now.
This Reuters / Ipsos poll taken after Trump's 34 felony convictions were announced shows Biden ahead of Trump among 2135 Registered Voters in the Head-to-Head and when they added Kennedy:
[B]Majority believe prosecution of Donald Trump upheld rule of law, not motivated by politics.
About one in ten Republicans say they will not vote for Trump with a felony conviction.
May 31, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/majority-believe-prosecution-donald-trump-upheld-rule-law-not-motivated-politics[/URL]
[QUOTE]The latest survey from Reuters/Ipsos, which began fielding following the announcement of a guilty verdict in the New York criminal trial against Donald Trump regarding hush money payments, shows that a majority of Americans believe the prosecution was about upholding the rule of law and not politically motivated. Donald Trump and Joe Biden remain locked in a close race for the 2024 presidential election. Following the conviction, a small, but not insignificant number, of Republicans say they will not vote for Trump with a felony conviction. One in five Americans say the recently concluded trial of Donald Trump has positively impacted their view of the American criminal justice system, while a quarter say it has negatively impacted their perceptions.[/QUOTE]
-
The hubris of "VICTIMHOOD"...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2919241] You douches did the unthinkable with an ex-president billionaire. You made him into a victim.[/QUOTE]
"Victim?"...perhaps! But perhaps, not in the way you imagine.
According to the Roy Cohn "mob boss playbook", Trump has posthumously entered the "victim" phase, as noted in the [b]"Bully. Coward. Victim." biography[/b] of the infamous bad man and notoriously corrupt gangster lawyer and once mentor to Trump, only servers to remind us, that the hubris of bad men, is just a temporary artful dodge, on the unbreakable path, to their eventual and inevitable demise.
[b]Bully. Coward. Victim: The Story of Roy Cohn | Why Now Is The Time To Talk About Roy Cohn | HBO[/b] 6-min video convos w/r to the Story of RC as it relates to DJT.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gD9ufYUseHU[/URL]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYpZreBOyrQ[/URL]
[LIST] Trump the Bully[/LIST][LIST] Trump the Coward[/LIST][LIST] And now, Trump the "Victim"?[/LIST]
Dutifully and unwittingly, said Elvis 2008, as you've highlighted, the next phase of the Trump spiraling downfall, as he follows in his mentor's footsteps, into "VICTIM", which is right on cue and right out of the Roy Cohn playbook.
As to [b]what version of "victim"[/b], comes next for Trump, maybe "poetic" for some, and yet for others may seen it as "poetic justice".
-
LOL. As if any version of Repub Trump makes him more or less a menace to USA
[QUOTE=Spidy;2919553]"Victim?"...perhaps! But perhaps, not in the way you imagine.
According to the Roy Cohn "mob boss playbook", Trump has posthumously entered the "victim" phase, as noted in the [b]"Bully. Coward. Victim." biography[/b] of the infamous bad man and notoriously corrupt gangster lawyer and once mentor to Trump, only servers to remind us, that the hubris of bad men, is just a temporary artful dodge, on the unbreakable path, to their eventual and inevitable demise.
[b]Bully. Coward. Victim: The Story of Roy Cohn | Why Now Is The Time To Talk About Roy Cohn | HBO[/b] 6-min video convos w/r to the Story of RC as it relates to DJT.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gD9ufYUseHU[/URL]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYpZreBOyrQ[/URL]
[LIST] Trump the Bully[/LIST][LIST] Trump the Coward[/LIST][LIST] And now, Trump the "Victim"?[/LIST]
Dutifully and unwittingly, said Elvis 2008, as you've highlighted, the next phase of the Trump spiraling downfall, as he follows in his mentor's footsteps, into "VICTIM", which is right on cue and right out of the Roy Cohn playbook.
As to [b]what version of "victim"[/b], comes next for Trump, maybe "poetic" for some, and yet for others may seen it as "poetic justice".[/QUOTE]The problem with Trump and every other Repub is not really whatever persona they project. The problem is their favorite and repeated policy and stewardship results are total crap. And that being the case, there will always be America-hating Repub voters salivating at the opportunity to vote for them, a Mainstream Media only too happy to work "Bothsiderism" and their self-serving disastrius headline needs to support and steer them to that end.
If Elvis was not blaming Dems for "forcing" poor baby Repubs to race to their beloved Worst President in History Trump to put him back in office to produce more Worst Results in History by turning him into a victim after his 34 Felony Convictions he would be blaming Dems for turning him into a winner if he had been acquitted. LOL. And turning him into a revisionist history acceptably ok potus for allowing him to get away with whatever 2016 election fraud he wanted if he hadn't been indicted, tried and convicted of his 34 Felonies in that regard.
Convicted, acquitted or ignore the Rule of Law and leave him blissfully unindicted, this current Repub fever to put him back in office to produce more Worst President in History results and their blaming Dems for it would be no different.
There is no way to prevent America-hating Repub voters from racing to vote for the next Repub / Trump's Pandemic, Great Depression, Great Recession, Massive Job Destruction, Multiple Bear Market Declines, Inevitable Dem Recovery Inflation and on and on and blaming Dems for "forcing" those poor babies to do it no matter who the Repub is, Hoover, Nixon, Reagan, the Bushes, Trump, convicted, acquitted or ignore their crimes altogether, it doesn't matter.
-
Hmm, if an ordinary citizen was worried about election integrity, what could they do? They could volunteer to work as an election judge. Like I do.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2919356]What? Why?
All I'm saying is this:
- 12 jurors found your idol guilty on every single count.
- there is no way some of these jurors aren't republicans and even trumpists.
- and yet, they agreed on the guilty verdict [B]on the second day of deliberation[/B] -- forced to agree -- because the prosecution proved their case beyond reasonable doubt.
- which means (and I'm deeply sorry to have to say this to you) that everyone who honestly believes in "rigged", are not exactly the sharpest tools in the box.
I hope you've managed to get through and send your money successfully.[/QUOTE]LOL. This is what we should do if any Jewish person like yourself is charged with a crime. This is your version of fair:
The police (in this case the Federal Elections commission) found you innocent.
You are charged by a prosecutor who literally ran on putting jews like you in jail.
Despite the police finding you innocent, the prosecutor charges you anyway.
The police are banned from testifying.
The charge against you is that you were funding terrorist activities against Palestinians.
The evidence against you is a check sent to a lawyer marked legal expenses.
The person putting the phrase legal expenses on the check was not you, and that person swears it was for legal expenses, and the check was sent to a lawyer.
The Judge in your case volunteered to take it.
This judge donated to the PLO.
The case is being tried in Dearborn, Michigan, the city with the most Muslims.
Potential jurors are lying on their forms to try to get on the jury.
Potential jurors are saying before the trial. I think we need to hold people like Xpartan accountable for the killing of Palestinians.
A video clip of you being insensitive to the Palestinian cause is played to the jurors.
One witness against you tells the jury you raped her. Before that she said you had consensual sex and then denied having sex with you at all, and she owes you $500,000 which she refuses to pay back.
The other witness is a convicted felon in jail for perjury among other things. He is caught lying time and time again, and he stole $50,000 from you.
This is your idea of fair? Hell, isn't a trial in the above case a waste of time?
Seeing as how you think this was fair, then all Jews accused of criminal behavior should be tried in Dearborn and only with judges who have donated to the PLO. Gee, I wonder how that will turn out.
-
You lost it at step one
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2919776]LOL. This is what we should do if any Jewish person like yourself is charged with a crime. This is your version of fair:
The police (in this case the Federal Elections commission) found you innocent.
You are charged by a prosecutor who literally ran on putting jews like you in jail.
Despite the police finding you innocent, the prosecutor charges you anyway.
The police are banned from testifying.
The charge against you is that you were funding terrorist activities against Palestinians.
The evidence against you is a check sent to a lawyer marked legal expenses.
The person putting the phrase legal expenses on the check was not you, and that person swears it was for legal expenses, and the check was sent to a lawyer.
The Judge in your case volunteered to take it.
This judge donated to the PLO.
The case is being tried in Dearborn, Michigan, the city with the most Muslims.
Potential jurors are lying on their forms to try to get on the jury.
Potential jurors are saying before the trial. I think we need to hold people like Xpartan accountable for the killing of Palestinians.
A video clip of you being insensitive to the Palestinian cause is played to the jurors.
One witness against you tells the jury you raped her. Before that she said you had consensual sex and then denied having sex with you at all, and she owes you $500,000 which she refuses to pay back.
The other witness is a convicted felon in jail for perjury among other things. He is caught lying time and time again, and he stole $50,000 from you.
This is your idea of fair? Hell, isn't a trial in the above case a waste of time?
Seeing as how you think this was fair, then all Jews accused of criminal behavior should be tried in Dearborn and only with judges who have donated to the PLO. Gee, I wonder how that will turn out.[/QUOTE]Sorry, but your analogy fell apart at step one.
The analogy would be the police thought you didn't commit a crime because you had cleverly hidden the part that proved it was a crime in an earlier, intentional, carefully planned, uh, "bookkeeping error".
Once that, uh, "bookkeeping error" was unearthed with full documentation and multiple witness testimony for the commission of a crime, in this case a Felony designed to commit Election Fraud and steal the 2016 election, the police, DOJ, judicial system, judge, jurors and all the rest had no choice but to enforce the Rule of Law and maintain Law and Order with equal justice to all.
There. See how that worked now?
-
Trump Attny: Trump and his Cult are silly and don't know what they are talking about
This just in! One of Trump's attorneys is calling out Lying Liars Who Lie For Their MAGA / Repub Lying Liar Are Lying Liars.
And silly.
[B]Trump Attorney: Biden And DOJ Had Nothing To Do With Trump Conviction.
Joe Tacopina makes mincemeat out of MAGA arguments that the Hush Money conviction was set up by President Biden.
June 2, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/06/trump-attorney-biden-and-doj-had-nothing[/URL]
[QUOTE]Tacopina: This is not a federal prosecution. Joe Biden or anyone from his justice department have absolutely zero to do with the Manhattan District Attorney's Office.
They have no jurisdiction over him. They have no context with him. They have no control, certainly, over him. So, to say that Joe Biden brought this case is one of the most ridiculous things I've heard.
We know that's not the case. And even Trump's lawyers know that's not the case.
.........
You know, so people who say that make it scary that they really don't know the law or what they're talking about. I mean, to suggest that Joe Biden would be behind the Manhattan District Attorney's prosecution is silly.[/QUOTE]
-
This is what unconstitutional lawfare against a potus' political opponent looks like
Banana Republican Party, anyone?
Unconstitutional potus weaponization of the DOJ and judicial system by a wannabe authoritarian dictatorship, anyone?
[B]'Where are all of the arrests?: Trump demands Barr lock up his foes.
The day-long run of tweets and retweets marked the most frantic stretch of Trumps public activity since he left Walter Reed.
Oct. 7, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/07/trump-demands-barr-arrest-foes-427389[/URL]
[QUOTE]Donald Trump mounted an overnight Twitter blitz demanding to jail his political enemies and call out allies he says are failing to arrest his rivals swiftly enough.
Trump twice amplified supporters criticisms of Attorney General William Barr, including one featuring a meme calling on him to arrest somebody! He wondered aloud why his rivals, like President Barack Obama, Democratic nominee Joe Biden and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton [/QUOTE][B]Trump ups pressure on Barr to probe Bidens as election nears.
Oct. 21, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-william-barr-elections-20fd56b64801dd83b1657c630a1ebdfa[/URL]
[QUOTE]President Donald Trump on Tuesday called on Attorney General William Barr to immediately launch an investigation into unverified claims about Democrat Joe Biden and his son Hunter, effectively demanding that the Justice Department muddy his political opponent and abandon its historic resistance to getting involved in elections.
With just two weeks to go before Election Day, Trump for the first time explicitly called on Barr to investigate the Bidens and even pointed to the nearing Nov. 3 election as reason that Barr should not delay taking action. Trump has been leveling accusations of corruption against Biden without verified evidence for months, but is stepping up the pressure in the final days of the campaign.[/QUOTE]Uh, Donnie, that is because there was no evidence of any wrongdoing by those Dems, you ignorant, America-hating fuck. As your own AG told you over and over again.
Which is very, very, very, very much unlike the overwhelming, compelling and conclusive evidence for Donnie's 34 Felony Convictions, as fairly determined first by a Grand Jury of ordinary American citizens and later by a 12 member jury of his peers in a Criminal Trial, all fully vetted, screened and approved of by Donald J. Trump himself.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2919836]The analogy would be the police thought you didn't commit a crime because you had cleverly hidden the part that proved it was a crime in an earlier, intentional, carefully planned, uh, "bookkeeping error".
There. See how that worked now?[/QUOTE]No, what I see is a dumb Democratic douche who quotes the "experts" whenever he can such that it benefits him. In this case, the expert was the Federal Elections Commission. And what you, a dumb Democratic douche, does not get is the FEC fined Hiliary for her role in Russiagate and looked into this matter with Trump and issued no fine. She tried to rig the election not Trump.
In other words, these experts did not even find a misdemeanor worth charging for and what Hiliary did was 100 X worse and she did get fined.
And so you can insert your usual belly aching about how biased anyone against you is who speaks the truth and how the FEC is so biased for Republicans.
And you can see the douche behavior continue with he was found guilty on all counts. What were the counts? What was the crime? And how was this jury right and the FEC wrong then?
And this is too fucking stupid to even debate so you can have the last word. I like what one journalist said. You do not charge someone running for president with a crime unless that crime is super, super serious in an election year. To charge the leading candidate for president with a case in an election year with something this fucking stupid was the real crime.
-
[QUOTE=Huacho;2919599]Hmm, if an ordinary citizen was worried about election integrity, what could they do? They could volunteer to work as an election judge. Like I do.[/QUOTE]Outstanding idea. But that would require our political keyboard warriors to enter the real world and actually participate in the electoral process. [B] LOL[/B]!
-
Paycheck Superhero vs. "Gov't Paycheck" Super Villain?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2919483]Spidy, your primary focus in life is having a government stealing money from hard working people to send to you so you can fuck women. That is not me. I work and pay my own way. I also see that the government you so love can turn against you. ... [/QUOTE]
As for [b]the grand delusions of Elvis 2008[/b]...Where is doth it begin, and where doth it end? Well no one really knows and who really cares?
However, the unsolicited [i][b]"fishing expeditions"[/b][/i], wild and crazy notions, and efforts to garner information about what may, or may not be, the [b][u]real[/u][/b] lives, livelihoods and whereabouts of an ISGer, is if anything...all a bit [b][i]"doxxy-cringy"[/i][/b].
[u]Paycheck Superhero?:[/u]
It's only natural, that when our Elvis 2008, makes up these elaborate stories and pretenses, about how this ISG Dem or that ISG Dem, earns their money or "gov't paycheck", that [u]he would play[/u] the part of [b]"Paycheck Superhero"[/b], having a soooooooo much bigger, better, larger, taller, greener and thicker stack of cheese, than the belittled ISG Dems who just love gov't cheese.
Yes, our [b]"braggadocios paycheck superhero",[/b] does paint a good picture of himself. Well, it is [u]his fantasy[/u] after all. (...kkkk!) In his mind, he is the Repub "self-made paycheck" superhero and ISG Dems are just "gov't paycheck" villains?
[u]Patience is a Virtue:[/u]
So while ISGers like Elvis 2008, are trying to create these elaborate narratives, stories and pretense, to satisfy their suppositions, speculations and wild conjectures about other ISGers, its been said to Elvis 2008, on several occasions (similar to what I was told about Trump), [i][b]"...just be patient, as people/ISGers will often tell you who they are, without you asking.[/b] Just Be Patient!"[/i]
[u]Next Episode/Installment:[/u]
Hey, Elvis 2008, if [b]"PATIENCE"[/b] is your thing and doesn't work for you, can I make a suggestion w/r to your next episode of Paycheck Superhero? That you make your "villains", more evil, lecherous and wanton for gov't cheese.
Look at how really cool that would be, when you bring down these [i]"badass villains"[/i] (that pilfer gov't coffers) with your superhero paycheck power?
[i][b]I only ask,[/b][/i] that if Spidy, is going to play a "badass villain", in a continuing role, in your Paycheck Superhero story, that it's only fair he gets, a $48 million dollar luxury yacht, like the one the Russians (and gullible House Repubs) reported Zelensky brought with US Gov't aid money.
I mean, how cool would that be, to give Spidy a luxury yacht, so he can really live up to the role of badass "gov't paycheck" [u]super villain?[/u] (...kkkk!)
Wouldn't that be a cool storyline for your next episode of Paycheck Superhero,...don't you think?
[b]PS:[/b] And while your at it, your pretenses would be less [b]"doxxy-cringy"[/b] if perhaps, you throw-in a yachting junket in the Caribbean, with a few dozen bikini-clad bronzed Brasileiras, sipping champagne and Caipirinhas (...kkkk!)
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2919976]As for [b]the grand delusions of Elvis 2008[/b]...Where is doth it begin, and where doth it end? Well no one really knows and who really cares?
[/QUOTE]All your bullshit and there is no denial of what I said. Even Tooms has someone admitting he is a monger. With you, there are crickets. In fact, there is not one post of yours that I could find that has anything to do with mongering at all. Is the only reason you are here is to talk politics?
-
So way off, so "Elvis"
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2919776]LOL. This is what we should do if any Jewish person like yourself is charged with a crime. This is your version of fair:
The police (in this case the Federal Elections commission) found you innocent.
You are charged by a prosecutor who literally ran on putting jews like you in jail.
Despite the police finding you innocent, the prosecutor charges you anyway.
The police are banned from testifying.
The charge against you is that you were funding terrorist activities against Palestinians.
The evidence against you is a check sent to a lawyer marked legal expenses.
The person putting the phrase legal expenses on the check was not you, and that person swears it was for legal expenses, and the check was sent to a lawyer.
The Judge in your case volunteered to take it.
This judge donated to the PLO.
The case is being tried in Dearborn, Michigan, the city with the most Muslims.
Potential jurors are lying on their forms to try to get on the jury.
Potential jurors are saying before the trial. I think we need to hold people like Xpartan accountable for the killing of Palestinians.
A video clip of you being insensitive to the Palestinian cause is played to the jurors.
One witness against you tells the jury you raped her. Before that she said you had consensual sex and then denied having sex with you at all, and she owes you $500,000 which she refuses to pay back.
The other witness is a convicted felon in jail for perjury among other things. He is caught lying time and time again, and he stole $50,000 from you.
This is your idea of fair? Hell, isn't a trial in the above case a waste of time?
Seeing as how you think this was fair, then all Jews accused of criminal behavior should be tried in Dearborn and only with judges who have donated to the PLO. Gee, I wonder how that will turn out.[/QUOTE]Calling it utterly illogical doesn't even begin to describe your train of thoughts. It's a clear manifestation of a deluded, hallucinating mind.
-
You mean the trial and convictions Trump / Repubs say are helping them?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2919944]No, what I see is a dumb Democratic douche who quotes the "experts" whenever he can such that it benefits him. In this case, the expert was the Federal Elections Commission. And what you, a dumb Democratic douche, does not get is the FEC fined Hiliary for her role in Russiagate and looked into this matter with Trump and issued no fine. She tried to rig the election not Trump.
In other words, these experts did not even find a misdemeanor worth charging for and what Hiliary did was 100 X worse and she did get fined.
And so you can insert your usual belly aching about how biased anyone against you is who speaks the truth and how the FEC is so biased for Republicans.
And you can see the douche behavior continue with he was found guilty on all counts. What were the counts? What was the crime? And how was this jury right and the FEC wrong then?
And this is too fucking stupid to even debate so you can have the last word. I like what one journalist said. You do not charge someone running for president with a crime unless that crime is super, super serious in an election year. To charge the leading candidate for president with a case in an election year with something this fucking stupid was the real crime.[/QUOTE]Why stop at presidential elections when a single congressional seat so often changes the direction of the country almost as much as that of president?
Then all of America's worst criminals will just race to the Republican Party, where they will be loving embraced and supported, and "run for election" when their trial delay tactics eventually time the start of their trials to begin in an election year. Which is officially every two years and in reality every year when you factor in special elections.
Good idea. Obviously well thought out. LOL. Pretty much par for the course for the typical Repub Criminal Party's version of Law and Order and Rule of Law. LOL.
So Mendendez' trial should be dropped or postponed until after this year's election?
How about Hunter Biden's trial? The blitheringly confused Repub Party and their typically pro Repub partners in Mainstream Media have worked so hard to equate Hunter with Joe, the trial of "President" Hunter Biden ought to be dropped or postponed until after the election too, right?
BTW, haven't you and Trump and The Repub Party and their beloved benefactors in MSM figured out if that trial and those 34 Felony Convictions hurt or helped, aided and boosted Trump's dumb hillbilly sucker Repub money grab and chances of winning another term to produce even more horrific Trump / Repub results across the board for at least "4 More Years" as seems to be the constant pitch these days?
We hear an awful lot about the latter being the case. Which is it today?
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2919995]It's a clear manifestation of a deluded, hallucinating mind.[/QUOTE]You made the dumb claim that there was "no way some of these jurors aren't republicans and even trumpists". Of course, you do not the numbers or names of those jurors.
And that tells me you do not understand the voir dire process. If I were the lawyer wanting to put your ass in jail in Dearborn, Michigan, I could easily get an all-Arab jury. In Manhanttan, it is child's play to get an all Democratic jury, so you are the one who is delusional. Hell, you probably think voir dire is the name of a French hooker.
If there was any interest in fairness, the case should have been moved to an area which is 50-50 Dems and Republicans. Then and only then would I agree with your claim that "no way some of these jurors aren't Republicans. ".
But your comments show me that you so desperately want to believe that this trial was fair, that you have not even figured out how it could be and was rigged.
-
Trump's 34 Felony Convictions
*sigh* This has been stated clearly dozens if not hundreds of times. But it seems there are still some sad souls who just can't or won't grasp the simple reality of exactly what Trump's Felony Convictions in his scheme to commit election fraud and steal the 2016 election were for. LOL. Yeah, yeah. I know.
Well, anyway, this report and overview is about as good as any of the other dozens if not hundreds or thousands published since Trump's Felony Convictions:
[B]What was Trump convicted of? Details on the 34 counts and his guilty verdict.
June 3, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-charges-conviction-guilty-verdict/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2920025]BTW, haven't you and Trump and The Repub Party and their beloved benefactors in MSM figured out if that trial and those 34 Felony Convictions hurt or helped, aided and boosted Trump's dumb hillbilly sucker Repub money grab and chances of winning another term to produce even more horrific Trump / Repub results across the board for at least "4 More Years" as seems to be the constant pitch these days?
We hear an awful lot about the latter being the case. Which is it today?[/QUOTE]LOL. You think all polls are conducted by Republicans. They have been all over the place. What do they matter to you when you just ignore the ones not favorable to your side?
What is factual is the last report from Trump campaign is they have raised $200 million since the verdict, and the only thing you douches can say is that all the people donating are fools. Are they? Hell, if Xpartan, Spidy, the Cane, and you were put on a jury, you four could not Trump innocent of anything, and that is what I mean by the trial being unnecessary. All Alvin Bragg had to do was find 12 douches like you all, and that is child's play in Manhattan. Hell, you were clamoring for a guilty verdict before the trial even started. You are so screwed in the head you would literally find any Republican guilty of anything.
Matt Taibbi wrote this under the title: A sham case, and everyone knows it.
Maureen Dowd in the New York Times in this morning's op-ed about Donald Trump's trial Even though the case was a stretch and not the strongest one against Trump, there was something refreshing about the jury doing what no one else around Trump has been able to do not the inexplicably sycophantish Republican lawmakers, not the corrupt Supreme Court, not the slowpoke Merrick Garland.
Whoa. Trump has so altered American consciousness that detractors feel comfortable publicly supporting the idea of slapping 34 felony convictions on the man as punishment for alleged earlier offenses. Dowd's slip if it was one wasn't rare. Editorial pages, broadcast panels, even political mailers in the past days implored readers to focus on Trump's overall history, not this particular case:
New York's Jonathan Chait, who lives on the outer edge of the spectrum of Trump-detesting pundits but has expressed unease with some recent moves to unseat him, wrote "the case was always marginal" and "the sort of charge you'the concoct if the target is a bad guy and you want to nail him for something. " Like Dowd, he explained the larger justification elsewhere:
In a global sense, Trump's conviction in a court is not just fair but overdue. He has been flouting the law his entire adult life. Once he ascended to the presidency, Trump's criminality only grew. He issued illegal orders constantly, flummoxing his staff.
Alan Shepard of The New Republic wrote essentially the same thing:
The hush-money trial gets at some of that. Was Trump trying to manipulate the election? Was he trying to hide an affair from his wife? Was it a little bit of column A and column be? We'll never know precisely. What is clear is that Trump is crooked and more than a little sleazytwo things that have been part of his self-image, to varying degrees, since he first became a public figure more than 40 years ago.
Ana Navarro got The View's studio audience (read: the closest thing to a show trial gallery we have in America) hooting and cheering at the idea of punishing Trump because he "made the life of our country a living hell for six years, and so he deserves to be held accountable":
Not one of these people recognized the obvious: that of all the things Donald Trump has been accused of, none are as serious or system-imperiling as abusing the courts to dispose of a political rival. If Trump was caught buggering a corpse while smoking joints rolled in rubles, it wouldn't approach the offense of "concocting" a charge to put away someone you want to "nail" for "something. ".
Here's The New Yorker's joking reply to the notion that this was a show trial:
Trump will not be summarily executed, as so many hundreds of thousands were in the Soviet purges. He won't even have to wear an orange uniform if he does, in fact, end up serving timeinmates in New York are actually banned from doing so.
This craziness been pervasive since Trump entered the political arena, a fact buried by commentators great and small. Joe Biden's post-verdict address insisted "this is a state case, not a federal case," omitting the minor detail that original evidence came from an FBI raid conducted after Special Counsel Robert Mueller referred the matter to the Southern District of New York. Mueller's investigation, remember, grew out of the FBI's dubious Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
This is why Hillary Clinton's similar records SNAFU is more than a gotcha! Factoid. Her campaign and the DNC were fined $113,000 for labeling ex-spy Christopher Steele's dossier "legal and compliance consulting. " These reports came out in pre-election stories in 2016 accusing Trump of being vulnerable to "blackmail" and of having a "back channel" to the Kremlin, but more importantly were used to prop up bogus FISA surveillance of former Trump aide Carter Page. The dossier was also key evidence in the January, 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that Russia conducted an "influence campaign" to "harm Clinton'selectability. ".
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was later asked if he'the have signed the FISA warrants if he knew then what was in the applications. "No, I would not," he said. In other words: the current Trump case was about hiding an alleged escapade with a porn star maybe from a wife, maybe from the public, maybe both, but Hillary hid a role in advancing FBI and intelligence investigations of a political opponent, an infinitely more serious business that may even have helped bring about this verdict.
Editorialists are working to reshape the history of what just happened in a less dubious light. The least ridiculous might be the argument offered by Vox, suggesting Trump's prosecution isn't evidence of excess, but rather simple logic:
If a man perpetrates a wide variety of frauds over the course of decades and routinely advertises his contempt for the rule of law prosecutors may aggressively scrutinize the legality of his business records and get a bit creative in holding him legally accountable.
That "a bit creative" take blurs lines between training attention on Trump because of his politics and doing so because he "advertises his contempt for the rule of law. " Meanwhile, in another New York Times piece today called "A Felon in the White House Would Test The American System," Peter Baker argues "the notion that 34 felonies is not automatically disqualifying and a convicted criminal can be a viable candidate. Upends two and a half centuries of assumptions about American democracy":
"There is no useful historical precedent whatsoever," said Jeffrey A. Engel, the director of the Center for Presidential History at Southern Methodist University. "The interesting matter is not that a former president has been tried and convicted, as the founders might well have anticipated, but that he remains a viable candidate for office, which they would have found astounding and ultimately disheartening. ".
The question of how to create an empowered executive without making him an unaccountable monarch absorbed the framers when they designed the Constitution. They divided power among three branches of government and envisioned impeachment as a check on a rogue president. They even explicitly made clear that an impeached president could still be prosecuted for crimes after being removed from office.
Baker has it backwards. The framers would have looked at this situation as a test case for why voters must be given more power than entrenched enforcement bureaucacies.
The endless pursuits of Trump through FBI and special counsel probes, illegal leaks of intelligence products, multiple impeachments, raids and lawsuits involving hyper-aggressive laws like the KKK and Espionage Acts, overt efforts to discourage legal representation of the candidate and deny him ballot access, and now preposterously huge fines and absurd criminal penalties that are like a thumb in the eye of the Eighth Amendment, put even people who were never Trump fans in the position of weighing worst-case scenarios.
For all Trump's flaws, he isn't the unaccountable monarch in this metaphor, and even detractors are admitting it.
-
But but but nobody has any money left after paying rent, buying gas and eating lunch!
Going all the way back to when the Great Job Creator President Jimmy Carter required Congress to include in the budget that companies offering the terrific tax-defferred retirement fund investment bonanza of a 401 K Plan as a blessing and gift to their top executives must ALSO offer that blessing and gift to their rank and file employees, this is the first time the average participant contribution rate neared the oft-recommended 15% level.
Thank you, Jimmy.
Thank you, Joe:
[B]Average 401 (k) savings rates recently hit a record here's what experts suggest.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/03/average-401k-savings-rate.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The average 401(k) plan savings rate, including employee and company contributions, recently hit a record high and the percentage is nearing a popular benchmark.
During the first quarter of 2024, the combined 401(k) savings rate reached 14.2%, according to a quarterly Fidelity analysis of almost 26,000 corporate plans and nearly 24 million participants.
That savings rate is the closest its ever been to Fidelitys recommended 15% benchmark. The investment firm estimates that a total retirement savings rate of at least 15% is a key step to being able to maintain your current lifestyle in retirement.[/QUOTE]Hard to get anywhere close to that level when Reagan, Bush1, Bush2 and Trump Repub economic policy and stewardship results are creating Great Repub Recessions, wiping out millions upon millions of jobs or skyrocketing Unemployment Rates to double digits.
Easy to do it during Bidenomics.
-
I repeat
There is simply NO money left anywhere for anyone after Americans come home from their better and higher-paying jobs they somehow wrestled away from millions of asylum-seeking refugees and miraculously pay their rent, buy gas and eat their weekly ration of birdseed and rain water.
Even wildly liberal MSM outlets say so:
[B]Americans Have More Investment Income Than Ever Before.
A booming economy and rising household wealth help some consumers keep spending.
June 5, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/economy/americans-have-more-investment-income-than-ever-before-84b7a6c6[/URL]
Damn you, Joe Biden! The gods curse the day we didn't listen to Mainstream Media darling Larry Summers and instead found ourselves mired in a horrible state of Bidenomics!
Please bring back Trump and his $2. 5+ Trillion added to the deficit to buy a million fewer jobs with his economic "stimulus" legislation than without it, Recessions in our Manufacturing and Agro industries so severe he had to issue hefty emergency welfare checks to them just to keep them afloat, two Bear Market Declines in just 4 years and that very popular Trump's Pandemic or whatever other "Once in 100 Years Disaster" Repub Trump can identify, embrace and exacerbate in order to create another Great Repub Depression / Recession, wipe out millions upon millions of jobs, shut down businesses and schools, trigger hyper-inflation in the necessary Dem Recovery and skyrocket the cost of rent, gas and food all over again for 4 More Years!
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2920057]You made the dumb claim that there was "no way some of these jurors aren't republicans and even trumpists". Of course, you do not the numbers or names of those jurors.
And that tells me you do not understand the voir dire process. If I were the lawyer wanting to put your ass in jail in Dearborn, Michigan, I could easily get an all-Arab jury. In Manhanttan, it is child's play to get an all Democratic jury, so you are the one who is delusional. Hell, you probably think voir dire is the name of a French hooker.
If there was any interest in fairness, the case should have been moved to an area which is 50-50 Dems and Republicans. Then and only then would I agree with your claim that "no way some of these jurors aren't Republicans. ".
But your comments show me that you so desperately want to believe that this trial was fair, that you have not even figured out how it could be and was rigged.[/QUOTE]What a doofus! Do you take some kind of a masochistic pleasure in embarrassing yourself over and over again?
Why would you need 50/50 when even one holdout can hang the jury?
And yet, there was no one.
They deliberated less than 1. 5 days.
The found your lord and savior guilty on all 34 charges. Not 32 or 33. All of them!
What else can you or anyone who's not a delusional and deranged cult member possibly want?
Here is a very brief video that gives some details about the process, the jurors and what their political preferences might be (here's a hint: they vary).
I hope, FOX is Republican enough for you?
[URL]https://youtu.be/pq8jmr84Z60[/URL]
-
Alter-ego "Paycheck Superhero" is denied?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2919986]All your bullshit and there is no denial of what I said. Even Tooms has someone admitting he is a monger. With you, there are crickets. In fact, there is not one post of yours that I could find that has anything to do with mongering at all. Is the only reason you are here is to talk politics?[/QUOTE]
(...kkkk!) Denial? What is there to deny, when the [b]"Paycheck Superhero"[/b], self image of yourself, lives in your own head?
Sure, what I wrote was bullshit...but in response to denounce, what a cockamamie bullshit [i]"Paycheck Superhero" story[/i], you [u]OFTEN[/u] love to weave about your self, in relation to me and several other left leaning ISGers, who you know little or squat about, as you continually try to [i]"fish"[/i] for information.
But hey, if you also want to play [i]"Paycheck Superhero",[/i] here in this forum, (and not just all up in that wasteland of a sad noggin of yours, naturally feel free...), all I'm asking, is that, if you're going to cast me and others as [b]"Gov't Paycheck Super Villains",[/b] then perhaps you could consider giving us equal billing?
Just saying, equal billing and a nice gov't $48 million dollar yacht for Spidy, would make for a better story in your alter-ego [b]"Paycheck Superhero"[/b] fantasy.
N'est-ce pas?
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2920332]What a doofus! Do you take some kind of a masochistic pleasure in embarrassing yourself over and over again?
Why would you need 50/50 when even one holdout can hang the jury?
And yet, there was no one.
They deliberated less than 1. 5 days.
The found your lord and savior guilty on all 34 charges. Not 32 or 33. All of them!
What else can you or anyone who's not a delusional and deranged cult member possibly want?[/QUOTE]LOL. You did not even know the process and now you google it. Let's do some math. Manhattan is 95% Democrat. Of the potential jurors, 5% then voted for Trump. Out of a pool of 100 jurors, the prosecution had 10 strikes from the jury pool. All they had to do was find the 5 likely Republicans and strike them which is easy. If you watch the TV show Bull, it is staggering how easy it is these days with social media to pick out party affiliation. On top of that, "Prospective jurors can be dismissed by the judge for cause if he finds they shouldn't serve on the panel." Got it? [URL]https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/15/politics/jury-selection-process-trump-trial/index.html[/URL].
There was no fucking way a Republican or anyone who voted for Trump was going to be on that jury, and you are stupid as fuck for believing that.
And I am not embarrassing myself. You are. You made the stupid claim that there were many people who voted for Trump on that jury. You made that shit up! Once again, you only believe the facts you want to and make shit up to convince you that you are right like all the douches on this forum do.
And you cannot name what the counts are, and you know why? Because there was one count that was repeated 34 times.
What amazes me is you are too stupid to see how this could be done against YOU, and I showed you exactly how it could be. You think this judge donating to Biden did not matter? How would you feel if you had a judge in a criminal trial against you and the judge donated to the PLO? And that is why it would be a piece of cake to get an all-Arab jury against you in Dearborn. Hell, I could pick out who to put on a jury just by their fucking names, and if I as prosecutor missed on one person, the PLO donating judge could clean it up.
But you do not want to believe that right? You know hookers. How often has one lied to you? Yeah, that was the star witness. A hooker and a convicted liar and thief. This was a bookkeeping entry that Trump did not even make. Think about that for a second. You could be put in jail for a bookkeeping error you did not even enter.
So what happened to Trump absolutely could happen to you. You are just too dense to believe it.
The only reason it won't happen is you are not important enough for someone to do this to you, but in your mind, you are like, "Yeah, I am a law abiding citizen, and Trump is not" while on a fucking monger board.
Maybe you can be like "law abiding" citizen Tooms and lie and say you have only banged hookers in countries where it was legal. Unreal.
-
Yes, Elvis. Let's Do The Math
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2920428].....Let's do some math. Manhattan is 95% Democrat. Of the potential jurors, 5% then voted for Trump. Out of a pool of 100 jurors, the prosecution had 10 strikes from the jury pool. All they had to do was find the 5 likely Republicans and strike them which is easy. If you watch the TV show Bull, it is staggering how easy it is these days with social media to pick out party affiliation. On top of that, "Prospective jurors can be dismissed by the judge for cause if he finds they shouldn't serve on the panel." Got it? [/QUOTE]I love it when Elvis 2008 says [B]"Let's do some math."[/B]. I know he is going to distort his numbers or just flat out mistake the results.
No, Elvis. Manhattan (New York County) did [B]NOT[/B] vote for Biden at 95%. Biden collected something like 86.8% and Trump 12.3%. That would make it 7 out 8 voters went to Biden. Not the 95 out of a 100 that you claimed. What is the difference? 95% vs 87.5%. [URL]https://www.politico.com/2020-election/results/new-york/[/URL].
BTW if the trial had been held in Dallas, Texas you would be complaining it wasn't fair? Dallas county voted for Biden over Trump at something like 2 out of 3.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2920428].......You made the stupid claim that there were many people who voted for Trump on that jury. You made that shit up! Once again, [B]you only believe the facts you want to and make shit up to convince you that you are right like all the douches on this forum do.[/B] [/QUOTE]Elvis you do this consistently. It is kind of laughable that you accuse others of doing the same.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2920428]What amazes me is you are too stupid to see how this could be done against YOU, and I showed you exactly how it could be. [B]You think this judge donating to Biden did not matter?[/B] [/QUOTE]Seriously Elvis?? Judge Merchan donated $15 to the Biden campaign. He also donated something like $20 to other Democratic fund raisers. He also received a caution after Trump's lawyers filed an ethics complaint. Odd that you see this as a big conflict. You might want to check out some of the gifts and trips that Clarence Thomas received. Just in case judicial conflicts really bother you.
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna78577[/URL]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2920428]But you do not want to believe that right? You know hookers. How often has one lied to you? Yeah, that was the star witness. A hooker and a convicted liar and thief. This was a bookkeeping entry that Trump did not even make. Think about that for a second. You could be put in jail for a bookkeeping error you did not even enter.
[/QUOTE]Why don't we admit to what really happened instead of making up a rationale. Trump was in the midst of his 2016 campain and the Access Hollywood tape came out. He excused it as "locker room talk" but his campaign was worried about another story breaking. Trump had his buddy at the National Enquirer "catch and kill" some other stories. I. e. A doorman at Trump Tower and Karen McDougal's story. Then came Stormy Daniels. But under campaign rules Trump couldn't just write the check himself without getting caught and exposed. So, he had his Attorney (fixer) pay Daniels off and he was paid back monthly by submitting invoices that amortized the payment and tax consequences. This wasn't just the testimony of Michael Cohen who doesn't have a reputation for honesty it was corroborated by the David Pecker from the National Enquirer and several others. Cohen who had known Trump for ages and knew of his inherent dishonesty taped their conversation so that he had proof that Trump agreed to repay him, just in case.
So yeah, Elvis. I see your point. This could happen to any of us.
-
*sigh*
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2920428]LOL. You did not even know the process and now you google it. Let's do some math. Manhattan is 95% Democrat. Of the potential jurors, 5% then voted for Trump. Out of a pool of 100 jurors, the prosecution had 10 strikes from the jury pool. All they had to do was find the 5 likely Republicans and strike them which is easy. If you watch the TV show Bull, it is staggering how easy it is these days with social media to pick out party affiliation. On top of that, "Prospective jurors can be dismissed by the judge for cause if he finds they shouldn't serve on the panel." Got it? [URL]https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/15/politics/jury-selection-process-trump-trial/index.html[/URL].
There was no fucking way a Republican or anyone who voted for Trump was going to be on that jury, and you are stupid as fuck for believing that.
And I am not embarrassing myself. You are. You made the stupid claim that there were many people who voted for Trump on that jury. You made that shit up! Once again, you only believe the facts you want to and make shit up to convince you that you are right like all the douches on this forum do.
And you cannot name what the counts are, and you know why? Because there was one count that was repeated 34 times.
What amazes me is you are too stupid to see how this could be done against YOU, and I showed you exactly how it could be. You think this judge donating to Biden did not matter? How would you feel if you had a judge in a criminal trial against you and the judge donated to the PLO? And that is why it would be a piece of cake to get an all-Arab jury against you in Dearborn. Hell, I could pick out who to put on a jury just by their fucking names, and if I as prosecutor missed on one person, the PLO donating judge could clean it up.
But you do not want to believe that right? You know hookers. How often has one lied to you? Yeah, that was the star witness. A hooker and a convicted liar and thief. This was a bookkeeping entry that Trump did not even make. Think about that for a second. You could be put in jail for a bookkeeping error you did not even enter.
So what happened to Trump absolutely could happen to you. You are just too dense to believe it.
The only reason it won't happen is you are not important enough for someone to do this to you, but in your mind, you are like, "Yeah, I am a law abiding citizen, and Trump is not" while on a fucking monger board.
Maybe you can be like "law abiding" citizen Tooms and lie and say you have only banged hookers in countries where it was legal. Unreal.[/QUOTE]Ok, let's do the math:
1. The 34 counts were the number of times Trump violated NY State Law in lying about what those 34 payments to Michael Cohen were for. If 34 kids or cops are killed by Repub-facilitated semi-automatic weapons, you get 34 counts of murder. Same thing here.
2. Falsifying business records by saying the payment was for legal fees when it was not is already a crime in NY. If you do it 34 times, that is 34 crimes.
3. Falsifying business records is bumped up to a more serious crime if it is conspired (2 or more people. Trump, Cohen and Allen Weisselberg are already 3) to be done in order to cover or mislead from another crime. In the case of Donald J Trump, in order to commit election fraud and influence the outcome of an election. To be more specific; to commit election fraud and steal the 2016 election. Which, by all easily observable reality, is exactly what they accomplished.
4. How do we know the conspiracy was to commit election fraud and thereby effect the outcome of the 2016 election? Because all of the witnesses clearly and unambiguously said so under oath or written documentation of it was presented and no witness or document suggested otherwise.
5. Why didn't Bragg have to first prove beyond a reasonable doubt in another trial with another 12 jurors that the crime of election fraud was committed in order for him to get 12 jurors to convict Trump of conspiring to commit that crime by falsifying his business records 34 times? Simple; NY State Law does not require that to be tried and proven separately as long as the conspirators knew, understood and acknowledged that they were doing it to effect the outcome of an election or that the current 12 jurors could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that they acknowledged it.
6. Don't like that aspect of NY State Law? No problem. Then commit election fraud that way in Hooterville, Oklahoma or Ithoughtitwasafart, South Dakota and don't pull your grifty, America-hating cons and crimes in a blue state with too many people much, much smarter than you. Go con Aunt Bea and Jed Clampett.
-
Damn. These Trumpsters / Repubs are pathetic!
As I have always asked, why don't Repubs every now and then simply try to produce some results other than Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions, Massive Repub Job Destruction and whatever "Once in 100 Years Disaster" they scour the landscape for to embrace and exacerbate in order to again and again Crash the USA Economy and Wipe Out Millions Upon Millions of Jobs?
If they did, they wouldn't always have to lie, cheat and steal to "win" something that the American electorate has clearly demonstrated they DO NOT WANT a Repub to win since the presidential election of 1988.
I mean, my god, they already get $Billions in free unearned and undeserved positive election campaign spin and support from their eternal beloved benefactors in Mainstream Media, no holds barred free campaign speeches, talking points, strategies and system hacks from Putin, Xi and every other enemy of America and that beautifully tailor-made for Repubs already rigged undemocratic Electoral College System on their side.
Yet they still need to pull criminal shit like this every time:
[B]Trump aide, lawyers charged in alleged fake electors scheme in Wisconsin.
Three people, an aide to former President Donald Trump and two lawyers, are now charged with felonies in a Wisconsin 2020 fake electors scheme.
June 4, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/politics/2024/06/04/trump-aide-two-lawyers-charged-in-2020-fake-elector-plot-in-wisconsin/73977086007/[/URL]
Trumpsters / Repubs are truly pathetic.
-
GOP, the Party of Open Borders, Defund the Police and Outlaw Sex For Pleasure
I'm thinking these and other factors that many poll respondents are not yet educated about, including the full truth about the terrific, historic recovery from the global disaster of Trump's Pandemic thanks to Bidenomics, Trump taking away the Reproductive Rights of American Men and Women, Trump's plan to jack up Inflation and the cost of rent, gas and food even more than he did with his Trump's Pandemic and so on will more than narrow the far less than a normal +/-MoE Statistical Tie between Biden and Trump in the only 3 state EC races that matter as shown in the RCP and 538 Polling Services Consensus Polls.
Especially after any debate with Biden that Trump can't conjure up an excuse to hide from and both candidate's National Conventions.
[B]Senate Republicans block bipartisan border security deal.
2/7/2024[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/4453955-senate-republicans-block-bipartisan-border-security-deal/[/URL]
[QUOTE]It also would have provided $6.8 billion to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, $7.6 billion for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and $4 billion to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Altogether, it would have invested $20.2 billion in improving border security.[/QUOTE][B]No Country for Law Men: The GOP Votes to Defund the FBI.
March 22, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/no-country-law-men-gop-votes-defund-fbi-opinion-1882085[/URL]
[QUOTE]Republicans conditioned support for the first tranche of spending bills signed by the president on March 9 on cutting $654 million from the FBI budgetincluding $32 million that went to the heart of operations, a cut that still left far-right Republicans complaining the cuts weren't deep enough.[/QUOTE][B]How Republicans turned on the FBI.
May 25, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/25/politics/republicans-fbi-what-matters/index.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]Former President Donald Trump wants to defund the FBI and Department of Justice.[/QUOTE][B]Senate GOP blocks bill to guarantee access to contraception.
June 5, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/05/politics/senate-vote-contraception-access/index.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]Senate Republicans voted Wednesday to block a bill put forward by Democrats that would guarantee access to contraception nationwide, as Democrats seek to highlight the issue in the run up to Novembers elections.
The bill the Right to Contraception Act would enshrine into federal law a right for individuals to buy and use contraceptives, as well as for health care providers to provide them. It would apply to birth control pills, the plan B pill, condoms and other forms of contraception.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Villainy;2920480]I love it when Elvis 2008 says [B]"Let's do some math."[/B]. I know he is going to distort his numbers or just flat out mistake the results.
No, Elvis. Manhattan (New York County) did [B]NOT[/B] vote for Biden at 95%. Biden collected something like 86.8% and Trump 12.3%. That would make it 7 out 8 voters went to Biden. Not the 95 out of a 100 that you claimed. What is the difference? 95% vs 87.5%. [URL]https://www.politico.com/2020-election/results/new-york/[/URL].[/QUOTE]LOL. All that does is make the math easier. Prosecutor has 12 jurors and finds the one or two Republican and takes the other 10 or 11. Do that x 2 and you have your jury and the alternates.
Yeah, you really showed me up. Tell me who was on the jury who was Republican and voted for Trump? Oh, you cannot. You are just another dumb Democratic douche.
[QUOTE=Villainy;2920480]Seriously Elvis?? Judge Merchan donated $15 to the Biden campaign. He also donated something like $20 to other Democratic fund raisers. He also received a caution after Trump's lawyers filed an ethics complaint. Odd that you see this as a big conflict.[/QUOTE]And his daughter was raising millions in donations playing up the trial. Only a douche like you would think Marchan was fair.
[QUOTE=Villainy;2920480]But under campaign rules Trump couldn't just write the check himself without getting caught and exposed. So, he had his Attorney (fixer) pay Daniels off and he was paid back monthly by submitting invoices that amortized the payment and tax consequences. This wasn't just the testimony of Michael Cohen who doesn't have a reputation for honesty it was corroborated by the David Pecker from the National Enquirer and several others. Cohen who had known Trump for ages and knew of his inherent dishonesty taped their conversation so that he had proof that Trump agreed to repay him, just in case.[/QUOTE]What rules? State or Federal? Trump was not running for a New York State office but a federal one. So the reason he was tried in New York was for political purposes, and you fucking know it. And the FEC knew all about what Trump did and fined him nothing, and this partisan hack of a so called judge would not let the FEC officials testify. You prove the point about how rigged the case was.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2920484]Ok, let's do the math:
1. The 34 counts were the number of times Trump violated NY State Law in lying about what those 34 payments to Michael Cohen were for. If 34 kids or cops are killed by Repub-facilitated semi-automatic weapons, you get 34 counts of murder. Same thing here.
2. Falsifying business records by saying the payment was for legal fees when it was not is already a crime in NY. If you do it 34 times, that is 34 crimes.[/QUOTE]Man, you Democratic keep making fools of yourselves. You keep mentioning these 34 counts and not one of you can even correctly say what they are.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2920484]3. Falsifying business records is bumped up to a more serious crime if it is conspired (2 or more people. Trump, Cohen and Allen Weisselberg are already 3) to be done in order to cover or mislead from another crime. In the case of Donald J Trump, in order to commit election fraud and influence the outcome of an election. To be more specific; to commit election fraud and steal the 2016 election. Which, by all easily observable reality, is exactly what they accomplished.
4. How do we know the conspiracy was to commit election fraud and thereby effect the outcome of the 2016 election? Because all of the witnesses clearly and unambiguously said so under oath or written documentation of it was presented and no witness or document suggested otherwise.
5. Why didn't Bragg have to first prove beyond a reasonable doubt in another trial with another 12 jurors that the crime of election fraud was committed in order for him to get 12 jurors to convict Trump of conspiring to commit that crime by falsifying his business records 34 times? Simple; NY State Law does not require that to be tried and proven separately as long as the conspirators knew, understood and acknowledged that they were doing it to effect the outcome of an election or that the current 12 jurors could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that they acknowledged it.[/QUOTE]And here are the facts: The payment to Daniels was made on Oct. 27. So the payment would not have been reported on the Pre-election report. The next report is the Post-Election Report.
In 2016, the Post-Election Report was required to be filed on December 8, one month after the election. So the prosecution's theory, that Trump wanted to hide the expenditure until after the election, makes no sense at all.
Even if we assume, incorrectly, that it was a campaign expenditure, it wouldn't have been reported until 30 days after the election. But again, none of this got to the jury, either through testimony or the judge's instructions.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2920484]6. Don't like that aspect of NY State Law? No problem. Then commit election fraud that way in Hooterville, Oklahoma or Ithoughtitwasafart, South Dakota and don't pull your grifty, America-hating cons and crimes in a blue state with too many people much, much smarter than you. Go con Aunt Bea and Jed Clampett.[/QUOTE]To prove election fraud, you have to prove that an expense could only be used in an election. That was never proven.
And by saying a criminal charge did not have to meet up to reasonable doubt, and I agree with you, there were reasonable doubts all over the place, means the verdict was illegal and unconstitutional and so was put in place to rig the 2024 election. This is the Alinsky method again. Accuse your opponent of what you are guilty of.
Yes, you are going to save Democracy by jailing your political opponents. You all do not give a shit about Democracy. All you care about is if your side wins.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2920644]Man, you Democratic keep making fools of yourselves. You keep mentioning these 34 counts and not one of you can even correctly say what they are.
And here are the facts: The payment to Daniels was made on Oct. 27. So the payment would not have been reported on the Pre-election report. The next report is the Post-Election Report.
In 2016, the Post-Election Report was required to be filed on December 8, one month after the election. So the prosecution's theory, that Trump wanted to hide the expenditure until after the election, makes no sense at all.
Even if we assume, incorrectly, that it was a campaign expenditure, it wouldn't have been reported until 30 days after the election. But again, none of this got to the jury, either through testimony or the judge's instructions.
To prove election fraud, you have to prove that an expense could only be used in an election. That was never proven.
And by saying a criminal charge did not have to meet up to reasonable doubt, and I agree with you, there were reasonable doubts all over the place, means the verdict was illegal and unconstitutional and so was put in place to rig the 2024 election. This is the Alinsky method again. Accuse your opponent of what you are guilty of.
Yes, you are going to save Democracy by jailing your political opponents. You all do not give a shit about Democracy. All you care about is if your side wins.[/QUOTE]Are you really that incapable of reading and comprehending what you read?
The 34 payments were not ever designated as "election expenses" or "campaign expenses".
Yet they were election campaign expenses. They were money reimbursements to Cohen for him paying Daniels for her silence.
See, that is why they were provably False, which is a crime in NY State.
As for bumping up ALL 34 of Trump's crimes to Felonies, it is not required in NY State Law that a separate trial be done to "prove" a subsequent crime was served by the Falsification as long as the conspiritors recognized it as such. Which these conspirators did according to all witness and documented testimony presented in the trial; they KNEW and UNDERSTOOD that they were Falsifying those business reports 34 times in order to produce Election Fraud and steal the 2016 election and for no other reason.
If it was as blissfully easy for it to be shown otherwise with witness or documented evidence as you have been fed by Fux News, Matt Taibbi or whatever numbskull Winger source is feeding you this silliness, the defense should have presented it at trial. If they were prevented from presenting it, then they should have found some that wasn't totally full of shit and pertinent to that case.
-
Do Wingers even know one conspirator Wrote It All Down?
Apparently, it is forbidden to mention this in the Fux / Taibbi Fact-free Bubble:
[B]"He Wrote All of it Down" - Prosecution has Weisselberg's Handwritten Notes, Spelling Out the Scheme.[/B]
[URL]https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2024/4/25/2237185/--He-Wrote-All-of-it-Down-Prosecution-has-Weisselberg-s-Handwritten-Notes-Spelling-Out-the-Scheme[/URL]
[QUOTE]Michael Cohens testimony in the election interference trial of Donald Trump shall be corroborated by a simple bank statement, on which CFO Allan Weisselberg broke down the reimbursement scheme.
..........
"He (Trump) could deny that he ever had sex with Daniels, argue he paid her off because she was extorting him, maintain theres nothing wrong with the paperwork and that he wasnt even aware of what Cohen was doing, and call everyone else a liar.
But the prosecution has David Pecker, and his description of the ongoing catch-and-kill scheme.
The prosecution also has Dylan Howard, who assisted Pecker with the scheme.
They have Trumps gatekeeper, Madeleine Westerhout.
They have Hope Hicks, who was in on the negotiations with Daniels.
They have Stormy Daniels who had sex with Trump, and can even describe his 'mushroom'.
They have Stormy's lawyer, who accepted the payment from Cohen.
All of whom will corroborate Michael Cohens testimony. Making Cohens perceived veracity-problem much less crucial.
They have a habitually cheap Trump, who doesnt pay anybody, suddenly OVERPAYING Michael Cohen a lot of money.
They have Cohen mortgaging his own home, to get the money to pay Stormy.
[B]And they have the TrumpOrg CFOs handwritten notes, spelling out the financial details of the entire scheme.[/b][/QUOTE]None of the conspiritors of Trump's 34 felonies truthfully listed any of those 34 payments as "election / campaign expenses. " If they had claimed just one of them as such, Trump would have been convicted of only 33 Felonies. But they didn't.
And there is no subsequent business report that supercedes the earlier one where everyone found religion and truthfully reported those payments as "election / campaign" expenses rather than the criminal Falsification of them being "legal fees / legal expenses. ".
The timeline for when the payments were made or when the submission of campaign expenses could have been reported is irrelevant gobbledygook.
The fact of the conspirators' under oath and unchallenged testimony and the written, documented and unchallenged description of the scheme along with the unchallenged audio recording of the instigator, director and sole beneficiary of the scheme discussing why and how he was going to pay all that money without the words "election / campaign expenses" being anywhere in it (do Wingers in the bubble even know that exists?) was all the jurors needed in order to convict him of those 34 Felonies.
No additional conviction of the ultimate crime for which the Business Report Falsification was done in another trial is necessary under NY State Law as long as the conspirators knew why they were doing it. As an abundance of unchallenged testimony and documentation showed in this case with zero testimony and documentation presented suggesting anything else.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2920644]Man, you Democratic keep making fools of yourselves. You keep mentioning these 34 counts and not one of you can even correctly say what they are.
And here are the facts: The payment to Daniels was made on Oct. 27. So the payment would not have been reported on the Pre-election report. The next report is the Post-Election Report.
In 2016, the Post-Election Report was required to be filed on December 8, one month after the election. So the prosecution's theory, that Trump wanted to hide the expenditure until after the election, makes no sense at all.
[/QUOTE]Seriously dude, your arrogance knows no bounds. We all know how to use Google. You want to understand the 34 counts? Here is an explanation to help you understand.
[URL]https://youtu.be/yRR6FYMs9zs?si=-snPaVq2PcOP01rg[/URL]
Your next comment belies your ignorance of the law. It doesn't matter when the crime was discovered it is relevant when it was committed. Trump falsified business records in order to hide his payment to Stormy. That was the predicate act. Watch the video you might understand the whole process better. Maybe.
-
YES, Pathetic and Petty...to the point of Blood Lust?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2920486][b]Damn. These Trumpsters / Repubs are pathetic! [/b]
As I have always asked, why don't Repubs every now and then simply try to produce some results other than Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions, Massive Repub Job Destruction and whatever "Once in 100 Years Disaster" they scour the landscape for to embrace and exacerbate in order to again and again Crash the USA Economy and Wipe Out Millions Upon Millions of Jobs?
If they did, they wouldn't always have to lie, cheat and steal to "win" something that the American electorate has clearly demonstrated they DO NOT WANT a Repub to win since the presidential election of 1988.
I mean, my god, they already get $Billions in free unearned and undeserved positive election campaign spin and support from their eternal beloved benefactors in Mainstream Media, no holds barred free campaign speeches, talking points, strategies and system hacks from Putin, Xi and every other enemy of America and that beautifully tailor-made for Repubs already rigged undemocratic Electoral College System on their side.
Yet they still need to pull criminal shit like this every time:
[B]Trump aide, lawyers charged in alleged fake electors scheme in Wisconsin.
Three people, an aide to former President Donald Trump and two lawyers, are now charged with felonies in a Wisconsin 2020 fake electors scheme.
June 4, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/politics/2024/06/04/trump-aide-two-lawyers-charged-in-2020-fake-elector-plot-in-wisconsin/73977086007/[/URL]
Trumpsters / Repubs are truly pathetic.[/QUOTE]
Trump fires up the Repub Reich, to a fever pitch of kabuki retribution, as dozens of Repubs, right-wing lawmakers and media pundits/conspiracists, conspire with criminals in retribution scheme, based on Trump's petty grievances.
The Repub Reich and clowns are kicking it up a notch and taking [b]Trump's "LOCK HER UP"[/b] campaign slogan rhetoric, on a national tour, to gin up retribution, wherever Repub and right-wing power exits, to shamefully spread lies, falsehoods, untruths and gin-up social and political attacks on Dems wherever possible. With the express goal of "LOCKING UP" and "PERSECUTING" as many fellow American Dems as possible.
This is what Trump's WANTS for America. Fascist politics and a dictator state, that translates to nothing more than REVENGE POLITICS for his crimes, insurrection and sedition! As he once again, projects his criminal pretenses on Dems.
[b]The GOP fires up its vengeance 2024 tour [/b]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/06/politics/republicans-revenge-tour-2024-trump/index.html[/URL]
Does sound eerie similar, to something like a American Holocaust?
-
RiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiGGED!
[QUOTE=Villainy;2920480]Why don't we admit to what really happened instead of making up a rationale. Trump was in the midst of his 2016 campain and the Access Hollywood tape came out. He excused it as "locker room talk" but his campaign was worried about another story breaking. Trump had his buddy at the National Enquirer "catch and kill" some other stories. I. e. A doorman at Trump Tower and Karen McDougal's story. Then came Stormy Daniels. But under campaign rules Trump couldn't just write the check himself without getting caught and exposed. So, he had his Attorney (fixer) pay Daniels off and he was paid back monthly by submitting invoices that amortized the payment and tax consequences. This wasn't just the testimony of Michael Cohen who doesn't have a reputation for honesty it was corroborated by the David Pecker from the National Enquirer and several others. Cohen who had known Trump for ages and knew of his inherent dishonesty taped their conversation so that he had proof that Trump agreed to repay him, just in case.
So yeah, Elvis. I see your point. This could happen to any of us.[/QUOTE]Seriously, Elvis is asking too much of the jury. If there were Trump sympathizers (and it's very likely there were at least one or two), they simply didn't have a choice. This is what overwhelming evidence does to jurors, LOL.
[QUOTE]The conversation, which took place on the morning of Sept. 6, 2016, was played Thursday as part of the testimony by expert witness Douglas Daus, who handles the processing of electronic devices for the Manhattan district attorney's office.
Cohen, Trump's former attorney, secretly recorded the conversation, which lasts about two minutes, during which he and Trump seem to discuss making a $150,000 payment to Karen McDougal to keep her quiet about the alleged affair, which Trump has denied ever took place.
"I need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend, David," Cohen can be heard saying on the call, appearing to refer to National Enquirer publisher David Pecker.
Cohen seemed to be speaking about a shell company he created to originally pay American Media Inc., the National Enquirer's publisher, before the deal went through.
On the phone, Cohen is heard saying he had "spoken to Allen Weisselberg about how to set the whole thing up with funding" referring to the former chief financial officer of the Trump Organization.
"So, what do we got to pay for this? One-fifty?" Trump can be heard asking in the recording.
[b]At one point during the conversation, Trump suggested making the payment in cash.
"No, no, no, no, no, I got it," Cohen responded.[/b][/QUOTE][URL]https://abcnews.go.com/US/jurors-hear-secret-recording-trump-michael-cohen-allegedly/story?id=109908089[/URL]
Yeah, totally rigged, LOL.
-
Good video on the facts of the case. But not unbiased.
[QUOTE=Villainy;2920718]Seriously dude, your arrogance knows no bounds. We all know how to use Google. You want to understand the 34 counts? Here is an explanation to help you understand.
[URL]https://youtu.be/yRR6FYMs9zs?si=-snPaVq2PcOP01rg[/URL]
Your next comment belies your ignorance of the law. It doesn't matter when the crime was discovered it is relevant when it was committed. Trump falsified business records in order to hide his payment to Stormy. That was the predicate act. Watch the video you might understand the whole process better. Maybe.[/QUOTE]That is a good overview of the facts of the case. The first 11 minutes especially. Not that most Wingers' attention span and tolerance for exposure to facts would get him / her past the first 2 minutes.
But if he / she could manage it they will be rewarded by what imo is clear bias spin in favor of poor Trumpty-Dumpty. Based on several times when she tipped her hand.
Among them:
Around the 19 minute mark, in the section where she answers a question about accusations of the trial being corrupt, she cites among a few excuses the "jury instruction debacle, which I covered before", presumably referring to the precedent established in a federal case being applied to this state case.
WTF? She never characterized the jury instructions as a "debacle" earlier. Quite the contrary. She repeatedly said that the state case example was only "a little bit different and I could see it being argued either way. ".
For the sentencing question, she dismisses the possibility that poor Trumpty-Dumpty would get (not deserve? It sure sounded like it) jail time because, after all, nothing must interfere with him running for president and it would be such a bother for the Secret Service. Then she later practically guarantees that appeals and counter appeals will likely take years to come to a final conclusion of the case, all during which time Trump can continue happily waddling, lying and threatening violence his way through a Repub presidential campaign.
She suggests that the case will probably be taken to the Supreme Winger Court and oh gee let me think, she guesses that it has the best chance of being overturned there but does not mention the blatantly obvious reason why. Leaving it to her fellow Winger / Trump-leaners to conclude, well, I guess because those 6 learned, fair and impartial QAnons on that court will see the error of the NY State Court's methods and Make America Great Again.
States Rights! Lolol.
She blythly repeats wholly unsubstantiated Trump and Trump Cult claims like that "it would be impossible for him to get a fair jury in NY" with zero "unbiased" push back on that lie.
And a few other things.
-
[QUOTE=Villainy;2920718]Your next comment belies your ignorance of the law.[/QUOTE]No, that's not what that word means. The comment demonstrates or epitomizes his ignorance and belies oh let's see, truth, reality, stuff like that.
-
[QUOTE=Villainy;2920718]Seriously dude, your arrogance knows no bounds. We all know how to use Google. You want to understand the 34 counts? Here is an explanation to help you understand..[/QUOTE]LOL. And you still cannot list even five of them. You guys keep going on about 34 counts and cannot even list what the crimes are.
[QUOTE=Villainy;2920718]Your next comment belies your ignorance of the law. It doesn't matter when the crime was discovered it is relevant when it was committed.[/QUOTE]Man, you cannot get anything right. Presidents have near total immunity on many, many matters so when it happens was huge. And the alleged "crime" was election interference but the expense only had to be reported after the election, so the whole concept of making a porn star payout as election interference is bogus.
You seem to think that Trump's employee who logged in legal expense and it being used as a porn star payout was illegal. The whole hush money payout, if it was illegal, was a misdemeanor at best. It had to be tied in with election interference to be a crime, and it did not interfere with the election because of the dates involved, and a hush money payout is not exclusive to an election, so once more, you cannot prove election interference.
And you seem to have missed the part where the FEC (Federal Elections Commission) looked into this case and did nothing. So they fucked up and 12 jurors who did not even have full access to all the information, including why the FEC did not even fine Trump, were right? From two witnesses everyone knows were lying their fucking asses off? How fucking stupid is that?
And now you seem to think you know more than the FEC too. You can't even list five of the 34 counts. We got Xpartan who is literally doing the mental masturbation thing where he swears there were Republicans on the jury. We got Tooms who says the jury did not even need to know beyond a reasonable doubt to convict, and the sad part of it all is you are all a bunch of mongers who are illegally banging or banged hookers in the USA. Oh, and jury composition does not matter. If you were charged with banging hookers in front of a bunch of fellow mongers versus a bunch of scorned housewives who were cheated on by a prosecutor saying he was going after mongers and was elected on that, it would not matter? Rule of law would prevail? Give me a fucking break.
But I cannot believe you guys even want to talk about it. The polls showed the conviction did nothing except put over $200 million in Trump's pocket which if you are a Democrat was stupid. It is also stupid that you are saying you are protecting Democracy while putting your opponent in jail over a bookkeeping entry.
But what else is new? Fauci just admitted that the 6 foot social distancing rule was not based on science. He admitted that the mandate with masks for children was not based on science. He also said the vaccines were not working at the same time they were being mandated. He admitted to all that. If the USA had travel bans, he would have been quizzed on that. Yet you still think they were great ideas. So you think everyone is on your side when in fact the "experts" you so cherish are not with you.
-
[QUOTE=Huacho;2920862]No, that's not what that word means. The comment demonstrates or epitomizes his ignorance and belies oh let's see, truth, reality, stuff like that.[/QUOTE]I accept that criticism. I should have said "underscores".
-
Court System
[QUOTE=Villainy;2920718]Seriously dude, your arrogance knows no bounds. We all know how to use Google. You want to understand the 34 counts? Here is an explanation to help you understand.
[URL]https://youtu.be/yRR6FYMs9zs?si=-snPaVq2PcOP01rg[/URL]
Your next comment belies your ignorance of the law. It doesn't matter when the crime was discovered it is relevant when it was committed. Trump falsified business records in order to hide his payment to Stormy. That was the predicate act. Watch the video you might understand the whole process better. Maybe.[/QUOTE]
Agreeing with you Villainy
I love how outside of the courthouse, "people" present evidence, but inside the courtroom. Crickets
The only people who need to understand the 34 counts are the jurors, who happened to listen to 20+ witnesses, had documentary evidence presented to them, and they all agreed that the criminal defendant is GUILTY, of all counts. THE END, until appeal.
-
The company you keep
I do not understand why anyone continues to go down this path with this person.
MAGA Cult leader. DJT - Convicted of state crimes; indicted in Federal and State courts; found liable for defamation stemming from a sexual assault, almost $100 millions.
Followers:
Manafort. Convicted; prison / Pardon.
Guiliani. Loses law license; indicted in multiple states; loses defamation $ millions.
Jenna Ellis. Pleaded guilty in ATL; will lose law license.
Kracken. Loses law license; indicted ATL.
Roger Stone. Convicted; commuted sentence.
Bannon. Convicted; soon prison.
Peter Navarro. Convicted; prison.
Michael Cohen. Convicted; loses law license; prison.
Flynn. Pled guilty; pardon.
Rick Gates. Pled guilty.
Wisselberg. Pled guilty; prison.
Enrique Tarrio. Convicted; 18 years prison term.
Stewart Rhodes (Oath Keepers) - Convicted; 18 years prison term.
All the fake electors. Indicted in multiple states.
Other Insurrectionists. Indicted; most found guilty or pled guilty; prison or probation.
The list above is probably not exhaustive. And yet there are more following him down this path, still. Their gamble is that he becomes president and pardon them. Here's a thought, in your own life, how many people do you know have been convicted of any crime? And, if the convicted person says I have an idea, do you really want to run with it?
His ecosystem is filled with people who are either convicted or indicted.
Why continue to make excuses for him?
-
Oh that is all because of Lawfare, don't cha know
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2920972]I do not understand why anyone continues to go down this path with this person.
MAGA Cult leader. DJT - Convicted of state crimes; indicted in Federal and State courts; found liable for defamation stemming from a sexual assault, almost $100 millions.
Followers:
Manafort. Convicted; prison / Pardon.
Guiliani. Loses law license; indicted in multiple states; loses defamation $ millions.
Jenna Ellis. Pleaded guilty in ATL; will lose law license.
Kracken. Loses law license; indicted ATL.
Roger Stone. Convicted; commuted sentence.
Bannon. Convicted; soon prison.
Peter Navarro. Convicted; prison.
Michael Cohen. Convicted; loses law license; prison.
Flynn. Pled guilty; pardon.
Rick Gates. Pled guilty.
Wisselberg. Pled guilty; prison.
Enrique Tarrio. Convicted; 18 years prison term.
Stewart Rhodes (Oath Keepers) - Convicted; 18 years prison term.
All the fake electors. Indicted in multiple states.
Other Insurrectionists. Indicted; most found guilty or pled guilty; prison or probation.
The list above is probably not exhaustive. And yet there are more following him down this path, still. Their gamble is that he becomes president and pardon them. Here's a thought, in your own life, how many people do you know have been convicted of any crime? And, if the convicted person says I have an idea, do you really want to run with it?
His ecosystem is filled with people who are either convicted or indicted.
Why continue to make excuses for him?[/QUOTE]We all know their current pat answer for all those guilty pleas and convictions for so many crooks, liars, thieves and con men circling the Trump toilet bowl: "Lawfare"! How else could evil Dems and enemies of Making America Great Again ruin the most perfect economic and national security policy and stewardship results the world has ever known? LOL. They are completely delusional about all of it.
Trump always had at least a tiny handful of spineless, overly forgiving supporters in any investigation or impeachment of his own outrageous criminality and traitorous words and actions to let him slide. Oh, he didn't really mean it, he is too stupid to commit this or that crime, hey, he hosted a sometimes funny game show where his only contribution was to read his script on a teleprompter, he's a harmless, lovable rogue, stop picking on the poor feller. LOL.
Which naturally allowed his cult supporters to mischaracterize all the earlier, overly generous allowances, deferential treatment given him as a potus, all the sliding and so on as "See? They tried everything and couldn't make anything stick! Russiagate! Everything's Rigged"!
So finally he found himself in a room with 12 ordinary Americans willing to look at the facts, the overwhelming evidence, witness testimony and documentation with no personal investment in him and his dumb sucker hillbilly Repub donation money on the line for them to let him slide again.
Meanwhile, an even greater level of delusion has been promoted and encouraged by his and his party's usual beloved pro Repub benefactors in Mainstream Media in order to continue the delusion that so much as a day during Trump's entire presidency was "better" on actual, provable, inarguable factors of the economy and national security or, more pertinent, because of Donald Trump vs the America of today under and most certainly thanks to Joe Biden:
[B]Worse than inflation: Let's remember Trump's real record in office.
Anyone who looks back on the Trump years as a golden time when things were so much better isn't remembering reality.
June 7, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.salon.com/2024/06/07/worse-than-inflation-lets-remember-real-record-in-office/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2920714]
The fact of the conspirators' under oath and unchallenged testimony and the written, documented and unchallenged description of the scheme along with the unchallenged audio recording of the instigator, director and sole beneficiary of the scheme[/QUOTE]Solely Trump huh? If Stormy Daniels was not paid and did not benefit, then the case should be dismissed. If this case was not such bullshit, you should be able to explain it easily.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2920714]how he was going to pay all that money without the words "election / campaign expenses" being anywhere in it (do Wingers in the bubble even know that exists?) was all the jurors needed in order to convict him of those 34 Felonies.[/QUOTE]Nope. Totally wrong.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2920714]No additional conviction of the ultimate crime for which the Business Report Falsification was done in another trial is necessary under NY State Law[/QUOTE]Then that law is unconstitutional. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.
You still do not get what happened.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2921012]Solely Trump huh? If Stormy Daniels was not paid and did not benefit, then the case should be dismissed. If this case was not such bullshit, you should be able to explain it easily.
Nope. Totally wrong.
Then that law is unconstitutional. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.
You still do not get what happened.[/QUOTE]I knew it didn't matter which if any of the illegal reasons the jury chose to convict him of those 34 Felonies by the end of the prosecution's opening statement day.
Why or how couldn't Trump have known it?
Is all of this just part of Trump trying to swing his and his Crime Family's favorite criminal / civil litigation defense, that they are Too Stupid to commit the crime?
-
Oh no. More numbers associated with a court case to throw Wingers into a tizzy!
Weren't there several Wingers here championing this bogus book and movie helping to spread America-hating Trump's Big Lie as all anyone needs to read and see in order to be convinced that Biden stole the 2020 election as has now been proven in a court of law that Trump stole the 2016 election?
[B]Dinesh DSouza election fraud film, book 2000 Mules pulled after defamation suit.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/31/dinesh-dsouza-election-film-2000-mules-pulled.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Former President Donald Trump, who lost to Biden, embraced 2000 Mules, screening the film at his Florida club Mar-a-Lago.
But since then, the claims made in the movie and the book, which was published by Salem Medias subsidiary Regnery Publishing, have been systematically debunked by journalists and law-enforcement officials.
Late last year, attorneys for True the Vote admitted in a Georgia court that they could not produce any documents to back up allegations about ballot stuffing in the 2020 presidential election in that state, which Biden won.[/QUOTE]And, no, none of us has to enumerate and fully explain each and every one of those 2000 wholly unsubstantiated claims for each and every one of those 2000 Mules in order to legitimately dismiss the entire book and movie as total America-hating crap.
As I am sure every America-hating Trumpian Winger would demand of us so they can sleep well at night knowing none of us did or had to.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2921045]Weren't there several Wingers here championing this bogus book and movie helping to spread America-hating Trump's Big Lie as all anyone needs to read and see in order to be convinced that Biden stole the 2020 election as has now been proven in a court of law that Trump stole the 2016 election?
[B]Dinesh DSouza election fraud film, book 2000 Mules pulled after defamation suit.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/05/31/dinesh-dsouza-election-film-2000-mules-pulled.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
And, no, none of us has to enumerate and fully explain each and every one of those 2000 wholly unsubstantiated claims for each and every one of those 2000 Mules in order to legitimately dismiss the entire book and movie as total America-hating crap..[/QUOTE]Actually, Trump's own AG Bill Barr stated that the Justice Department checked out all the allegations enumerated in DSouza's film "2000 Mules" and they found the claims to be without merit.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2921038]I knew it didn't matter which if any of the illegal reasons the jury chose to convict him of those 34 Felonies by the end of the prosecution's opening statement day.[/QUOTE]Now that it appears to no longer matter. Here are the 34 charges: [URL]https://www.newsnationnow.com/trump-investigation/donald-trumps-34-criminal-charges/[/URL].
All of these charges occurred in 2017 and had a 2 year statue of limitations. There is five year statue if the falsification of business records was due to cover up or facilitate a crime. Given that there was no proof of any of the three crimes laid out and they were not announced until closing arguments, the crimes could have been paying for murder, kidnapping, or assault. And the jury was instructed if 4 of you think he paid for murder, 4 of you think he paid for kidnapping, and 4 of you think he paid for assault, that is okay, you can and should still find him guilty. At worst, this was a misdemeanor repeated 34 times but one where the statue of limitations had run out.
The key part of this case was Cohen. [URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-charges-conviction-guilty-verdict/[/URL]
Cohen was the only witness who testified that Trump knew about the true purpose of the reimbursements, a crucial pillar of prosecutors' effort to show Trump's intent.
Anyone in the monger world knows or should know that there is gray in the law. You can pay for dinner or for time or buy a gift but you cannot pay directly for sex. Thing about the law is it very hard to get a conviction if you went to a lawyer and he told you something was okay. So to convict Trump you have to believe he was the mastermind and Cohen was the innocent victim who knew it was illegal and stupidly went along for the ride. Give me a break.
It is way more likely Cohen put this payment in the gray area of the law and if the FEC looked at it, they would do nothing, and that is exactly what happened.
But if you want to talk stupid, look at the next post.
-
Mistrial practically a done deed now
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/mistrial-trump-hush-money-judge-suggests-juror-may-have-had-predetermined-guilty-verdict[/URL]
So the NY Supreme Court has a website and someone wrote: Thank for all the hard against the MAGA crazies! My cousin is a juror on Trump's criminal case and they are going to convict him tomorrow according to her. Thank you New York Courts!!
This looked like one of Spidy's dumb posts, and at first glance, it should be taken as seriously as one of Spidy's posts. However, this comprised hack of a judge has taken it seriously and sent a letter to both sides yesterday suggesting this poster was legitimate. A woman on Twitter identified herself as a defense lawyer and said there is no doubt in her mind that this means mistrial.
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2920964]The only people who need to understand the 34 counts are the jurors, who happened to listen to 20+ witnesses, had documentary evidence presented to them, and they all agreed that the criminal defendant is GUILTY, of all counts. THE END, until appeal.[/QUOTE]Just like Tooms had Trump guilty before the case was even presented, it appears now that the jurors were in the same boat.
And you kind of missed something else. There was the public as a whole. [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-has-raised-400-million-one-week[/URL].
On May 30th, Donald Trump was found guilty on 34 counts of. Falsifying records of something, no one really quite knows what. A week later on June 6th, Trump announced that he has raised $400 MILLION since the verdict.
The sixth amendment says that citizens have a right to a jury of their peers at trial, and the typical Democratic douche excuse for this $400 million is the people giving it are stupid, but there is no intelligence requirements on one's peers. If you are a judge and someone is convicted in your court room, and that person gets $400 million in donations in the one week following the verdict, you fucked up.
So the net effect of this fiasco is Democrats have completely shattered whatever faith Americans had in the justice system and Trump walks free with $400 million in hand. Way to go Democrats!
-
Was it you Elvis?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2921135][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/mistrial-trump-hush-money-judge-suggests-juror-may-have-had-predetermined-guilty-verdict[/URL]
So the NY Supreme Court has a website and someone wrote: Thank for all the hard against the MAGA crazies! My cousin is a juror on Trump's criminal case and they are going to convict him tomorrow according to her. Thank you New York Courts!!
This looked like[/QUOTE]This sounds just like a typical provocation straight out of the Trump / Putin Joint Disinformation Manual.
-
Trump didn't know and apparently never asked?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2921135][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/mistrial-trump-hush-money-judge-suggests-juror-may-have-had-predetermined-guilty-verdict[/URL]
So the NY Supreme Court has a website and someone wrote: Thank for all the hard against the MAGA crazies! My cousin is a juror on Trump's criminal case and they are going to convict him tomorrow according to her. Thank you New York Courts!!
This looked like one of Spidy's dumb posts, and at first glance, it should be taken as seriously as one of Spidy's posts. However, this comprised hack of a judge has taken it seriously and sent a letter to both sides yesterday suggesting this poster was legitimate. A woman on Twitter identified herself as a defense lawyer and said there is no doubt in her mind that this means mistrial.
Just like Tooms had Trump guilty before the case was even presented, it appears now that the jurors were in the same boat.
And you kind of missed something else. There was the public as a whole. [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-has-raised-400-million-one-week[/URL].
On May 30th, Donald Trump was found guilty on 34 counts of. Falsifying records of something, no one really quite knows what. A week later on June 6th, Trump announced that he has raised $400 MILLION since the verdict.
The sixth amendment says that citizens have a right to a jury of their peers at trial, and the typical Democratic douche excuse for this $400 million is the people giving it are stupid, but there is no intelligence requirements on one's peers. If you are a judge and someone is convicted in your court room, and that person gets $400 million in donations in the one week following the verdict, you fucked up.
So the net effect of this fiasco is Democrats have completely shattered whatever faith Americans had in the justice system and Trump walks free with $400 million in hand. Way to go Democrats![/QUOTE]Sure. Trump never understood nor knew nor asked what the Election Fraud purpose was in the Trump Org Conspiracy To Steal The 2016 Election when he authorized those payments to Cohen.
All 34 times.
Brilliant, hands-on businessman.
Was he already suffering from the now blatantly obvious serious cognitive impairment he exhibits at every public appearance back then? That should have been the central defense argument; "Not only would he have been too stupid to commit this crime even at his most cognitively competent state back in the early 1980's, but now can't identify his own wife in a photo and thinks WWII has not happened yet".
That jury as well as any jury anywhere would have produced a unanimous 34 count acquittal after only 10 minutes of deliberation with 9 of them spent checking the boxes on the form.
Even the obviously pro Trump-biased lady in Villainy's otherwise very good overview of the case and trial linked video did not once mention a potential problem with the Statute of Limitations on any count or factor in the case. And she was really looking hard for anything that could be used on appeal or to overturn it.
-
Rubbish...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2921135][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/mistrial-trump-hush-money-judge-suggests-juror-may-have-had-predetermined-guilty-verdict[/URL]
So the NY Supreme Court has a website and someone wrote: Thank for all the hard against the MAGA crazies! My cousin is a juror on Trump's criminal case and they are going to convict him tomorrow according to her. Thank you New York Courts!!
This looked like one of Spidy's dumb posts, and at first glance, it should be taken as seriously as one of Spidy's posts. However, this comprised hack of a judge has taken it seriously and sent a letter to both sides yesterday suggesting this poster was legitimate. A woman on Twitter identified herself as a defense lawyer and said there is no doubt in her mind that this means mistrial.
Just like Tooms had Trump guilty before the case was even presented, it appears now that the jurors were in the same boat.
And you kind of missed something else. There was the public as a whole. [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-has-raised-400-million-one-week[/URL]. [/QUOTE]
(...kkkk!) Elvis 2008, pure utter rubbish, as usual! Way to suck the life out of common sense, thinking!
Our resident INCEL consipiracist, continues to out do himself and trot-out the utter rubbish and twitter nonsense as "proof" and "evidence" of facts, with zero journalistic integrity from the shit he finds, reads and believes. The gullible idiots, propagating the lies and pretexts from the Twitter (and Russian) slave masters of chaos and disinformation, is only evidence that idiots can be very useful.
But by all means continue to post your absurdity about CONVICT Trump's innocence...I do enjoy a good laugh! Your conspiracy fantasies and flights fancy are VERY ENTERTAINING!
BTW, I can't wait, but when's your next episode of [b]"Paycheck Superhero"[/b], due out?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2921135]So the net effect of this fiasco is Democrats have completely shattered whatever faith Americans had in the justice system and Trump walks free with $400 million in hand. Way to go Democrats! [/QUOTE]
(...kkkk!) Repubs did that long ago and time and time again, after the many failed presidencies and economies. As for back as crooked Nixion! Trump is just the most recent incarnation of the corrupt and crooked Repub Reich.
Yeah, the Repub Reich, talk a good talk, about the Rule of Law, but ONLY when it doesn't apply them! But there are ALWAYS consequences!
Elvis 2008, here you are whining again, when you should be looking at the bright side of things? You see, while the Dems, do indeed get their GUILTY felon and criminal conviction, the Trumpster, gets to siphon another $400 Million from gullible Repubs. (...kkkk!) [i][b]Sounds like a WIN-WIN to me![/b][/i]
Hey, maybe Trumpster should reconsider his stalling tactics on his other trials? Just think of [b]how much more he could siphon from gullible Repubs,[/b] with a GUILTY verdict from those trials? (...kkkk!)
Just think, of all the episodes of "Paycheck Superhero", you could write, if Trump was also found GUILTY, in the other trials he's been dodging. Where you could regale, pontificate and entertain, us Dems, with all your fantastic tales of how you had to wait 10-hours on the phone, to donate to Trump, because lines were busy with all the other gullible donors...kkkk!
Personally, I can wait for such heroic tales!
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2921216]That jury as well as any jury anywhere would have produced a unanimous 34 count acquittal after only 10 minutes of deliberation with 9 of them spent checking the boxes on the form.[/QUOTE]When you mean anywhere, you mean anywhere that is solidly blue. You douches like to point out that rule of law schtick, but the rule of law is if someone is caught lying under oath, you strike everything that person said, and in this case, even the left wingers were saying he was full of shit. If there is no Cohen, there is no case. If this case were prosecuted in upstate New York, which is red, Trump walks.
Speaking of which, the Democratic Department of Justice is prosecuting Hunter Biden for the least important part of what was found on his laptop, his drug use, and his lying on a gun application to get a gun. Unlike with Trump, when the star witness was in jail, this time the star witness is Hunter Biden himself and what he wrote and is on video. It is as open and shut a case as it gets. If anyone else had been charged with this, there would have been a plea deal offered up and anyone who not in the family of a high ranking Democrat would have taken it. The defense has been left with defining what an addict is. Yes, it is the Clinton what is your definition of is is all over again.
Anyway, there is a lawyer on youtube who got most everything right in the Trump case predicting that Hunter Biden would be acquitted despite the fact that everyone admits all the evidence is against him. His rationale is Jill Biden is flying back from France daily and spending time in the court room to intimidate the jury. I was not sold on that until I heard where the venue is. Guess where? It is in Delaware and I openly guffawed. And then I was like, yeah, Hunter is going to walk. No doubt.
-
While Trump Slept Through The Basic Explanation of His 34 Felony Charges
Masterful. Thanks, Joe. You flipped Trump's Pandemic Inflation and Putin's idiotic War into a Big WIN for America and its energy future!
[B]It Turns Out President Biden Is A Genius Oil Trader.
Who knew Scranton Joe found a way to break OPEC, earn $582 million in profits for the U.S. Treasury, stabilize oil prices and help the green market?[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/06/it-turns-out-president-biden-genius-oil[/URL]
A Must Watch 8 minute video:
How Joe Biden rewrote the rules for oil trading and broke OPEC!
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2921351]When you mean anywhere, you mean anywhere that is solidly blue. You douches like to point out that rule of law schtick, but the rule of law is if someone is caught lying under oath, you strike everything that person said, and in this case, even the left wingers were saying he was full of shit. If there is no Cohen, there is no case. If this case were prosecuted in upstate New York, which is red, Trump walks.
Speaking of which, the Democratic Department of Justice is prosecuting Hunter Biden for the least important part of what was found on his laptop, his drug use, and his lying on a gun application to get a gun. Unlike with Trump, when the star witness was in jail, this time the star witness is Hunter Biden himself and what he wrote and is on video. It is as open and shut a case as it gets. If anyone else had been charged with this, there would have been a plea deal offered up and anyone who not in the family of a high ranking Democrat would have taken it. The defense has been left with defining what an addict is. Yes, it is the Clinton what is your definition of is is all over again.
Anyway, there is a lawyer on youtube who got most everything right in the Trump case predicting that Hunter Biden would be acquitted despite the fact that everyone admits all the evidence is against him. His rationale is Jill Biden is flying back from France daily and spending time in the court room to intimidate the jury. I was not sold on that until I heard where the venue is. Guess where? It is in Delaware and I openly guffawed. And then I was like, yeah, Hunter is going to walk. No doubt.[/QUOTE]No, I meant any jury anywhere would have acquitted Trump on the basis of him being too stupid or too cognitively impaired or too insane (the jury can pick 1-3) if his argument had been he didn't understand, know or even bother to ask why he was signing off on 34 Over Payments to the 2nd in command of the Trump Org Election Fraud Conspiracy To Steal The 2016 Election.
You know, his defence team could have and should have presented the evidence of him mistaking a photo of his $85 Million sexual assault / rape victim for his wife, claiming WWII hadn't happened yet, that he is actually dead today since he only "nearly escaped death" several months ago when he was 1100 miles away from the house the FBI searched, etc.
Sorry, but a trial by a jury of your peers is generally conducted where the alleged crime was committed. That is why Trump should be pulling these big money fraud and election interference crimes in Oklahoma, Kansas, South Dakota or wherever he can find folks like Aunt Bea and Barney Fife to con and make sure there would no smarty pants blue-staters in a jury.
Of course, that would require him and Melania to hang out in red states and interact with the people who are bussed from Trump Rally to Trump Rally and vote for him. LOL. No chance they'll want to endure that for very long unless they can hide out in a fortress like Mar-a-Lardo in Florida.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2921265]
Our resident consipiracist, continues to out do himself and trot-out the utter rubbish and twitter nonsense as "proof" and "evidence" of facts, with zero journalistic integrity from the shit he finds, reads and believes. The gullible idiots, propagating the lies and pretexts from the Twitter (and Russian) slave masters of chaos and disinformation, is only evidence that idiots can be very useful.
[/QUOTE]Yeah, that was a hell of a conspiracy on my part. A rigged court found Trump guilty, pissed off Republicans, and did not make a dent in the polls. Meanwhile, your dumb douche ass has been pounding sand on all the irrelevant nonsense. 91 indictments! Twice Impeached! 34 counts! And all you did was net Trump nearly half a billion.
Obviously, you cannot only read the lea leaves; you think the plant is coffee. So only the usual "disinformation" outlets covered the judge's letter: zero hedge, Newsmax, and Twitter. What does that mean? Well, you and the douches think it is nothing / disinformation as usual. Have you noticed there has been none of this "convicted felon" talk in the media? Oh yeah, there was the usual comedy routines on Kimmel and Colbert the night of but after that it has been crickets. No one on our side finds this shit funny. It was a disgusting, gutless act. Who has been prosecuted for what Trump did before? Oh right. No one. When you say you follow rule of law, that does not mean you make up rules as you go along.
And now the next big issue is the sentencing. If the judge rules Trump should be in jail, Trump will be hitting the $1 billion mark in donations, and this so called judge will have to be staying in blue country the rest of his life. So how comes this letter comes now? Especially when the post was made before the jury went into deliberation? And why a cousin? Maybe because I cannot identify my second and third cousins. They could be anyone.
Like I said that post was as dumb as the posts you make, but it was taken seriously enough for the judge to write a letter. Why? Again, you douches are so focused on your "victory" you do not see what comes next. And why from the Supreme Court which is the next court where Trump would head? IMO it is a message from that court. Keep us the fuck out of this circus. Let the case fester in the media a few weeks and then get rid of it or we will.
So this holier than thou jury which were made up of people like you and Tooms will be smacked down. This judge will say he cannot in good conscience let this verdict go on given jury misconduct and declare a mistrial. Bad, bad jury. And this verdict just like Russiagate, Ukrainegate ETC will be put in the never mind pile. Russiagate? Never mind. The irony is that the judge does not even have to prove this is true. He can make this decision totally on his own without proof. Just the NY Supreme Court sending it was proof enough.
A jail sentence would be the best thing for Trump and a mistrial would be the worst. Now, you douches can be shocked, shocked that the jury was rigged, and the justice system is saved.
FWIW, I hope the prediction is wrong. This trial brought Republicans together like nothing else.
-
President Joe Biden is Lightyears ahead of his predecessor...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2921370]Masterful. Thanks, Joe. You flipped Trump's Pandemic Inflation and Putin's idiotic War into a Big WIN for America and its energy future!
[B]It Turns Out President Biden Is A Genius Oil Trader.
Who knew Scranton Joe found a way to break OPEC, earn $582 million in profits for the U.S. Treasury, stabilize oil prices and help the green market?[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/06/it-turns-out-president-biden-genius-oil[/URL]
A Must Watch 8 minute video:
How Joe Biden rewrote the rules for oil trading and broke OPEC![/QUOTE] Excellent video and watch, w/r to how President Joe Biden is playing chess to his predecessor's playing checkers.
Another great reason why Joe Biden should be President in Nov 2024, from a President who actually makes deals for the country and Americans, instead of for himself and/or his mob crime family.
Well Done JOE!
-
Policy and Stewardship
[QUOTE=Spidy;2921437]Excellent video and watch, w/r to how President Joe Biden is playing chess to his predecessor's playing checkers.
Another great reason why Joe Biden should be President in Nov 2024, from a President who actually makes deals for the country and Americans, instead of for himself and/or his mob crime family.
Well Done JOE![/QUOTE]Repubs think the solution to every challenge facing a complex national economy like the USA is to give disproportionately high tax cuts to their political donor class in the top income margins, abolish or ignore regulations and then just go fishing. Or golfing. Or pony riding. Or golfing again. Or clearing brush down at the ranch. Or golfing and golfing and golfing again.
They have been doing that for 100 years. And, no surprise, they have produced and presided over every single Great Depression, Great Recession, Massive Jobs Destruction and Historic Stock Market Decline for those same 100 years and none of the Historic Recoveries, Expansions, Jobs Creation or Stock Market Gains.
Of course the Repubs' "Cut taxes, forget about regulations and we all get to be rich Deadbeats" would be a more popular Economic Policy than the kind of real work, knowledge, wisdom and experience it takes to avoid producing and presiding over any historic downturn, massive jobs destruction and disaster of the past 100 years, not one, and produce every historic positive opposite of those results instead, as Dem presidents have done.
The polls tell us so.
However, I much prefer to consider actual results shown time and time again over the course of 100 years rather than how pleasant an Economic Policy sounds.
-
Dent in the polls?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2921434]Yeah, that was a hell of a conspiracy on my part. A rigged court found Trump guilty, pissed off Republicans, and did not make a dent in the polls. Meanwhile, your dumb douche ass has been pounding sand on all the irrelevant nonsense. 91 indictments! Twice Impeached! 34 counts! And all you did was net Trump nearly half a billion.
Obviously, you cannot only read the lea leaves; you think the plant is coffee. So only the usual "disinformation" outlets covered the judge's letter: zero hedge, Newsmax, and Twitter. What does that mean? Well, you and the douches think it is nothing / disinformation as usual. Have you noticed there has been none of this "convicted felon" talk in the media? Oh yeah, there was the usual comedy routines on Kimmel and Colbert the night of but after that it has been crickets. No one on our side finds this shit funny. It was a disgusting, gutless act. Who has been prosecuted for what Trump did before? Oh right. No one. When you say you follow rule of law, that does not mean you make up rules as you go along.
And now the next big issue is the sentencing. If the judge rules Trump should be in jail, Trump will be hitting the $1 billion mark in donations, and this so called judge will have to be staying in blue country the rest of his life. So how comes this letter comes now? Especially when the post was made before the jury went into deliberation? And why a cousin? Maybe because I cannot identify my second and third cousins. They could be anyone.
Like I said that post was as dumb as the posts you make, but it was taken seriously enough for the judge to write a letter. Why? Again, you douches are so focused on your "victory" you do not see what comes next. And why from the Supreme Court which is the next court where Trump would head? IMO it is a message from that court. Keep us the fuck out of this circus. Let the case fester in the media a few weeks and then get rid of it or we will.
So this holier than thou jury which were made up of people like you and Tooms will be smacked down. This judge will say he cannot in good conscience let this verdict go on given jury misconduct and declare a mistrial. Bad, bad jury. And this verdict just like Russiagate, Ukrainegate ETC will be put in the never mind pile. Russiagate? Never mind. The irony is that the judge does not even have to prove this is true. He can make this decision totally on his own without proof. Just the NY Supreme Court sending it was proof enough.
A jail sentence would be the best thing for Trump and a mistrial would be the worst. Now, you douches can be shocked, shocked that the jury was rigged, and the justice system is saved.
FWIW, I hope the prediction is wrong. This trial brought Republicans together like nothing else.[/QUOTE]Why would anyone expect Trump's Cult Followers to refrain from lavishing him with love in the polls or at the ballot box for being a convicted criminal, s Felon 34 times over, and for committing Election Fraud in order to steal the 2016 election? That has been their entire agenda right up to and beyond their violent, cop-attacking, cop-killing Insurrection on January 6, 2021. LOL.
No, Biden closing the gap in the polls vs Trump in the only 3 Battleground States that matter according to the months long unchanged RCP No Toss Up States EC Map and will move the score to 270 ECs for Biden has been happening since Biden's terrific State of the Union Address and since he has been appearing and campaigning in those states.
See, Biden benefits from showing up and being seen and heard. Trump suffers from that. Which is why I have always recognized the past Facebook and Twitter bans on Trump as little more than those CEOs helping him win polls and possibly elections. Same with him sleeping through his trial for a few days per week and any gag order that sticks. It only helps Americans forget what an addlebrained loon he is.
Meanwhile, this is the virtual tie in all three of the only Battleground States that matter and that Biden needs to flip a tiny Trump advantage over the next 4 months, continuing his post-SOTU Address positive trend as shown in the RCP and 538 Consensus of Polls on those states:
RCP Consensus.
WI = +0. 1 Trump.
MI = +0. 3 Trump.
PA = +2. 3 Trump.
538 Consensus.
WI = +0. 8 Trump.
MI = +0. 4 Trump.
PA = +1. 4 Trump.
Those are tiny and still shrinking advantages, easy to flip at any time but most especially if you have a behemoth Get Out The Vote / Ground Game presense in those states, as Biden does, vs zero ground game in those states, as Trump has.
Really, all things considered, Biden could easily win those 270 EC Votes and the election if it were held tomorrow. It's been that way for several weeks already.
-
How low can Scumbag Joe go
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2921549]Why would anyone expect Trump's Cult Followers to refrain from lavishing him with love in the polls or at the ballot box for being a convicted criminal, s Felon 34 times over, and for committing Election Fraud in order to steal the 2016 election? That has been their entire agenda right up to and beyond their violent, cop-attacking, cop-killing Insurrection on January 6, 2021. LOL.
No, Biden closing the gap in the polls vs Trump in the only 3 Battleground States that matter according to the months long unchanged RCP No Toss Up States EC Map and will move the score to 270 ECs for Biden has been happening since Biden's terrific State of the Union Address and since he has been appearing and campaigning in those states.
See, Biden benefits from showing up and being seen and heard. Trump suffers from that. Which is why I have always recognized the past Facebook and Twitter bans on Trump as little more than those CEOs helping him win polls and possibly elections. Same with him sleeping through his trial for a few days per week and any gag order that sticks. It only helps Americans forget what an addlebrained loon he is.
Meanwhile, this is the virtual tie in all three of the only Battleground States that matter and that Biden needs to flip a tiny Trump advantage over the next 4 months, continuing his post-SOTU Address positive trend as shown in the RCP and 538 Consensus of Polls on those states:
RCP Consensus.
WI = +0. 1 Trump.
MI = +0. 3 Trump.
PA = +2. 3 Trump.
538 Consensus.
WI = +0. 8 Trump.
MI = +0. 4 Trump.
PA = +1. 4 Trump.
Those are tiny and still shrinking advantages, easy to flip at any time but most especially if you have a behemoth Get Out The Vote / Ground Game presense in those states, as Biden does, vs zero ground game in those states, as Trump has.
Really, all things considered, Biden could easily win those 270 EC Votes and the election if it were held tomorrow. It's been that way for several weeks already.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/joe-biden-approval-538/2024/06/10/id/1168177/[/URL]
-
Well, Trump does have a Ground Game to Nearly Escape Death by a shark
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2921761][URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/joe-biden-approval-538/2024/06/10/id/1168177/[/URL][/QUOTE]I see Joe's post-SOTU Address momentum toward closing the already tiny and easily surmountable gap between him and Trump to capture the 270 EC votes needed to win a 2nd term has tightened since yesterday.
Note the improvement for Biden in all three of the only battlegound states he needs to flip in the 538 Consensus Polls below:
RCP Consensus.
WI = +0. 1 Trump.
MI = +0. 3 Trump.
PA = +2. 3 Trump.
538 Consensus.
WI = +0. 7 Trump.
MI = +0. 3 Trump.
PA = +1. 3 Trump.
[URL]https://www.realclearpolling.com/latest-polls[/URL]
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/michigan/[/URL]
Interesting that demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP has been sitting on those particular Consensus Polls figures for a very, very long time, especially that 2. 3 point advantage for Trump in PA. LOL. If RCP is behaving as usual, they are holding back a few PA and perhaps other polls that show Biden tightening if not outright overcoming and exceeding those already tiny gaps until another Rasmussen, Emerson or Harris poll showing Trump with a lead in those states comes along to Save The Day! LOL.
Well, no matter. Even with the numbers as they are shown on RCP right now, Biden's serious Get Out The Vote / Ground Game vs Trump's zero ground game other than apparently to sink to the bottom of the sea on a boat with a very heavy battery rather than get your leg bitten off by a shark all but guarantees a Biden win if the election were held tomorrow.
-
Confession of a Conspiracist?
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2921434] [b]Was it you Elvis? [/b]
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2921135][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/mistrial-trump-hush-money-judge-suggests-juror-may-have-had-predetermined-guilty-verdict[/URL]
So the NY Supreme Court has a website and someone wrote: Thank for all the hard against the MAGA crazies! My cousin is a juror on Trump's criminal case and they are going to convict him
tomorrow according to her. Thank you New York Courts!![/QUOTE]
[b]This sounds just like a typical provocation straight out of the Trump / Putin Joint Disinformation Manual. [/b][/QUOTE]
Xpartan, that was a good idea to just ask, Elvis 2008. It appears the GUILT was just too much to bear! (...kkkk!)
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2921434] Yeah, that was a hell of a conspiracy on my part. [/QUOTE]
Good for you Elvis 2008, I guess it is true what they say...CONFESSION is good for the soul! And the truth shall set you free! (...kkkk!)
-
Poll - Independents say Trump should END 2024 campaign...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2921549]No, Biden closing the gap in the polls vs Trump in the only 3 Battleground States that matter according to the months long unchanged RCP No Toss Up States EC Map and will move the score to 270 ECs for Biden has been happening since Biden's terrific State of the Union Address and since he has been appearing and campaigning in those states. ...
RCP Consensus.
WI = +0. 1 Trump.
MI = +0. 3 Trump.
PA = +2. 3 Trump.
538 Consensus.
WI = +0. 8 Trump.
MI = +0. 4 Trump.
PA = +1. 4 Trump.
Those are tiny and still shrinking advantages, easy to flip at any time but most especially if you have a behemoth Get Out The Vote / Ground Game presense in those states, as Biden does, vs zero ground game in those states, as Trump has.
Really, all things considered, Biden could easily win those 270 EC Votes and the election if it were held tomorrow. It's been that way for several weeks already.[/QUOTE] President Biden, now also has the majority support among INDEPENDENTS, yet another important voting base, in many of those swing states, since citizen Trump is convict and criminal Trump.
[b]Majority of independents and 'double haters' think Trump should end 2024 campaign: POLL[/b]
[URL]https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/majority-independents-double-haters-trump-end-2024-campaign/story?id=110778206[/URL]
[QUOTE][b] "Double haters" [/b]
Former President Donald Trump's guilty verdict on all 34 counts in his hush-money trial appears to have a majority of independents and "double haters," those who have an unfavorable view of both Trump and President Joe Biden, feeling that the former president should end his bid for the White House, according to a recent ABC News/Ipsos poll -- a number that could have a ripple effect on the election in November. [/QUOTE]
So if you believe in the POLLS, Biden is definitely the stronger and winning candidate for the 2024 Election, among independents.
-
WTF do Sharks and Batteries have in common in a sinking boat?
Fuck, if I know!
But the demented, deranged and drooling wack-job that is Trump, will tell ya, if you care to listen? (...kkkk!)
[b]Trump Reveals He'd Rather Die by Electrocution Than by Shark[/b]
[URL]https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2024/06/trump-reveals-hed-rather-die-by-electrocution-than-by-shark.html[/URL]
Is convict Trump, surely breaking from the pressures of going to jail?
It appears even an additional $400 million, can't help a crazed lunatic!
PS: I hear the video is even just as CRINGY!
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2921370]Masterful. Thanks, Joe. You flipped Trump's Pandemic Inflation and Putin's idiotic War into a Big WIN for America and its energy future!
It Turns Out President Biden Is A Genius Oil Trader.
Who knew Scranton Joe found a way to break OPEC, earn $582 million in profits for the U.S. Treasury, stabilize oil prices and help the green market?[/QUOTE]You mean less than 1% of what Joe wasted in Ukraine.
And wasn't another of Biden's goals to take Russian oil off the market?
Russia's budget revenues from oil and gas soared by 73.5% in January-May of 2024 compared to the first five months of 2023, according to data from Russia's finance ministry released on Monday. Between January and May 2024, the revenues for the Russian federal budget from oil and gas hit $55.7 billion (4. 95 trillion Russian rubles), per the data reported by Russian news agency TASS.
And if we are spending so much to fight Russia in Ukraine so it cannot take over Europe, why are Europeans still buying Russian gas?
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/european-leaders-might-renew-contract-keep-russia-ukraine-gas-pipeline-flowing-despite[/URL]
Bloomberg reported Monday that European officials are currently discussing plans to keep the gas flowing through a key Russia-Ukraine pipeline, and that Ukraine. Which has hit desperation given its dire wartime energy needs and situation. Favors it.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2921370]How Joe Biden rewrote the rules for oil trading and broke OPEC![/QUOTE]Senile Joe did not break OPEC. He helped Russia after trying to break it! And the only people doing anything constructive on cheap energy are the American oil and gas companies Biden wanted to tax the shit out of. When gasoline prices were hurting him in the polls, Biden begged the Saudis for more oil and they told him to fuck off. He then went to Venezuela and after he learned they could do nothing, finally quit fucking with American oil companies.
You are in essence cheering on Biden for using the emergency oil reserves to make money by gambling. That is not what the oil reserve is there for.
And how is this helping green energy? If this is the best Biden can do, he has already lost.
-
Green energy and the electric car debacle
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/05/congress-ev-chargers-billions-00129996[/URL]#text=Congress%20 at%20 the%20 urging%20 of, to%20 install%20 a%20 single%20 charger.
Congress at the urging of the Biden administration agreed in 2021 to spend $7. 5 billion to build tens of thousands of electric vehicle chargers across the country, aiming to appease anxious drivers while tackling climate change.
Two years later, the program has yet to install a single charger.
But Biden made half a billion on oil trading!
As to why we have electric cars, there was this from the same authors of getting us under the Covid curve, [URL]https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2022/08/electrifying-transportation-reduces-emissions-and-saves-massive-amounts-of-energy/[/URL].
Modern gasoline-powered vehicles waste a whopping 80% of the energy in their fuel. In all, the various energy losses in an EV add up to 31% to 35%. Regenerative braking adds 22% back into the system, making the overall efficiency around 87% to 91%.
Even if the grid were entirely fueled by coal, 31% less energy would be needed to charge EVs than to fuel gasoline cars.
Build more coal plants? You cannot make this shit up.
Of course, this all misses the point. I rented a car and they gave me an EV. Thing is I had no fucking clue how to recharge it and how long it would take. I was in this area for 48 hours and did not want to spend 10 hours on recharging it. I turned the car in half full and waited for the bill and was happy to see that if it was above 20% I would not be charged extra. The car was not bad. It drove like a golf cart, but it underscores the point with EVs, the problem with them is time.
Even Elon Musk said that his "superchargers" take an hour to charge a vehicle. "You know when you are talking a long trip, you just pull in and get some food and coffee while you charge up. ".
And who wants to do that?
And Trump has pounced on this. "They say the happiest day when you buy an electric car is the first 10 minutes you're driving it, and then after that, panic sets in because you're worried, 'Where the hell am I going to get a charge to keep this thing going? Trump said at a September rally with autoworkers in Michigan.
[URL]https://mishtalk.com/economics/ford-loses-132000-on-each-ev-produced-good-news-ev-sales-down-20-percent[/URL]
Ford Loses $132,000 on Each EV Produced, Good News, EV Sales Down 20 Percent.
These losses are despite huge tax incentives and subsidies. Ford is more dependent on truck buyers than GM, and truck buyers have shown little interest in electric trucks.
On April 15, Elon Musk Fires 10 Percent of Tesla Workforce, Prepares for "Next Phase of Growth".
In preparation for more growth, Musk issues a memo announcing an workforce cut of 10 percent and two top Tesla (TSLA) executives resign.
So no chargers built, EVs losing money like crazy, Tesla laying off 10% of its workforce, Chinese EVs literally sitting empty in parking lots because no one wants to buy them, and the tax payer on the hook for subsidies for building EVs that few want.
But, but, but EVs are more efficient. We just need to build more coal plants.
Ah yes, the Biden energy plan is such a success. Thanks Joe!
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2921888]You mean less than 1% of what Joe wasted in Ukraine.
And wasn't another of Biden's goals to take Russian oil off the market?
Russia's budget revenues from oil and gas soared by 73.5% in January-May of 2024 compared to the first five months of 2023, according to data from Russia's finance ministry released on Monday. Between January and May 2024, the revenues for the Russian federal budget from oil and gas hit $55.7 billion (4. 95 trillion Russian rubles), per the data reported by Russian news agency TASS.
And if we are spending so much to fight Russia in Ukraine so it cannot take over Europe, why are Europeans still buying Russian gas?
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/european-leaders-might-renew-contract-keep-russia-ukraine-gas-pipeline-flowing-despite[/URL]
Bloomberg reported Monday that European officials are currently discussing plans to keep the gas flowing through a key Russia-Ukraine pipeline, and that Ukraine. Which has hit desperation given its dire wartime energy needs and situation. Favors it.
Senile Joe did not break OPEC. He helped Russia after trying to break it! And the only people doing anything constructive on cheap energy are the American oil and gas companies Biden wanted to tax the shit out of. When gasoline prices were hurting him in the polls, Biden begged the Saudis for more oil and they told him to fuck off. He then went to Venezuela and after he learned they could do nothing, finally quit fucking with American oil companies.
You are in essence cheering on Biden for using the emergency oil reserves to make money by gambling. That is not what the oil reserve is there for.
And how is this helping green energy? If this is the best Biden can do, he has already lost.[/QUOTE]The average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA today is $3. 44 and has been steadily declining for more than a year:
[URL]https://gasprices.aaa.com/[/URL]
In 2019, the last of Trump's well below average economic years that he was already skyrocketing the deficit to "buy" pre-Trump's Pandemic, a truly historic debacle, the cost rose to $2. 90.
Yeah, that's 54 cents more per gallon.
The good news is today the USA has more and better paying jobs abundantly available, no Recession in the Manufacturing and Agricultural sectors due to Trump's failed trade war so severe that emergency welfare checks have to be issued just to keep them afloat, there was no Bear Market Decline last year as there was in 2018, Biden is not, repeat not, defunding and removing any Early Warning / Pandemic Prevention teams from any labs in China or anywhere else, the USA Military is involved in exactly zero Wars anywhere on the planet and have not been for 3 years and our President today is not publicly siding with and blowing Putin, Xi or any other enemy of America at every opportunity.
America is a million times better off today than it was 4 years ago, 5 years ago, 6 years ago and 7 years ago.
-
The Future is BRIGHT with Presiden Joe Biden at the helm...
Despite the House Repub clown show, that is led by MTG's continual Russian puppeting, and who leads the charge to disband from NATO, President Joe Biden, is firm in the belief, that the combined strength of NATO is the key to Ukraine defeating Putin.
So Does the Russia's penultimate most "useful idiot", [b]Moscow Marjorie[/b] (aka.Capital Hill Karen, aka.Cruella DeVil on the Hill), even know what the word "ally" means? Or are dictionaries also being banned in Georgia?
Since NATO was formed and founded, it is the most successful defense pack in history of the world. In 75 years we've only invoked Article 5, [b]'The Defense of One, is the Defense of All'[/b], has ONLY been invoked ONCE...for the U.S.A. And that was after 911, where our [b]NATO allies[/b] came to our defense.
[b]63 House Republicans voted against a non-binding, bipartisan resolution...[/b]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/minutes/congress/04-6-2022/nato-vote/[/URL]
So while Russia's "useful idiots", Trump, [b]Moscow Marjorie[/b] and 63 Repubs, try to bring down NATO, it is only one of dozens chaotic and anarchist efforts from their [b]"Project 2025"[/b] list of subversive anti-American doctrines to overthrow the Rule of Law and democratic governance, with its anti-democracy, anti-constitutional, anti-human-rights and anti-equal rights, fascist tyrannical dictatorship policies.
Project 2025 Subversive Doctrine, if Trump is elected in 2024 (Note: This is just a short list)
• Mass layoffs of civil servants [b] || [/b]End Birthright Citizenship
• Install Trump loyalists [b] || [/b]10% Tarrif on foreign goods
• Terminate Constitution [b] || [/b]No "two-state" solution
• Investigate political advisors [b] || [/b]Withdraw from NATO
• Mass deportations [b] || [/b]Punish Hospital that provide any transgender care
• Bomb Mexico [b] || [/b]National ban on abortion, women's care, trans care minors
• Shoot Migrants [b] || [/b]Gut the green energy programs
• Electrify Wall [b]|| [/b]Exit the Paris Climate Accords
• Reinstate and expand ban of people from Muslim-majority countries [b] || [/b]Gut the EPA Increase the use of fossil fuels & discard EVs
• Impose "ideological screening", for immigrants[b] || [/b]Enforce the Comstock Act to ban abortion nationwide
• Revoke student visas for ceasefire protesters[b] || [/b]Allow states to punish women as they see fit
• Terminate the Dept. of Education[b] || [/b]Immunity to all police officers
• Teach "patriotic education" [b] || [/b]Require "stop & frisk"
• Shoot shoplifters [b] || Billionaires go free stealing billions, exempt from prosecution
• Mass tent camps for homeless people[b] || [/b]Federal takeovers of Democratic cities including D.C., Chicago and New York
• Re-institutionalize the mentally ill [b] || [/b]Deploy national guard to protests
Repubs, would love nothing more than, to turn-back the clock and have us go back to the "good old days" of 100+ years of burning fossil fuels, while poking fun and political jabs, at the advances, ebbs and flows of a viable burgeoning clean energy industry, that is relatively speaking [u]only in its infancy, but nonetheless making huge strides.[/u]
[LIST]Let's not forget the technological advances from the past 100+ years of oil, gas, coal and nuclear and hydro was NEVER a straight line from "A to B". And still to this day, has a ton of problems, environmental issues and still gets lots of gov't funding and subsidies thrown it, for what is suppose to be a VERY mature and PROFITABLE industries.[/LIST][LIST]Today wind, solar, BESS and UHVDC lines and systems, are more efficient, more easily and faster to deploy, develop and costs way less per kw/h than traditional fossil fuel energy sources. Even has nuclear beat with its 3x, 4x and 7x cost overruns and avg. 13+ years to build. Meanwhile clean green energy systems are up and running in 6 months to 1 year and very affordable per kw/h, at even larger economies of scale.[/LIST]But Thanks to President Joe Biden (and President Barack Obama), game changing administrative [b]policies and stewardship[/b] like the promoting and developing AI Initiatives (2016), CHIPS and Science Act, along with the Inflation Reduction Act, has paved the way to producing the next round of trillion dollar US tech companies and green energy innovations.
Yes, thanks to President Joe Biden, US tech AI and green energy companies, see a bright future ahead, with all its warts and fare share of gov't subsidies, ebbs and flows, for the next foreseeable 100+ years of clean green energy future. [b](Note: Let's also not forget, the "harvesting of electrons" is a relatively "free energy" source)[/b].
Thanks President Joe Biden!
-
Oh, those poor babies, Big Oil and OPEC
Thanks again, Joe:
[B]Big Oil given stark warning as a major crude supply surplus expected by 2030.
June 12, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/12/big-oil-given-stark-warning-as-a-major-supply-surplus-expected-by-2030.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The International Energy Agency said Wednesday that a U.S.-led surge in global oil production is expected to outstrip demand growth between now and the end of the decade, pushing spare capacity to unprecedented levels and potentially upending OPEC+ market management.
The forecast prompted a stern warning for Big Oil from IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol, who suggested the worlds largest energy majors may wish to align their business strategies with the changes taking place.
its latest medium-term market report, titled Oil 2024, the global energy watchdog said oil demand growth was on track to slow down before ultimately reaching its peak of near 106 million barrels per day by 2030. Thats up from just over 102 million barrels per day in 2023.
At the same time, the IEA expects total oil production capacity to surge to nearly 114 million barrels per day by 2030 a whopping 8 million barrels per day above projected global demand.
The IEA said this would result in levels of spare capacity not seen before other than at the height of the Covid-19 lockdowns in 2020.
It warned that these dynamics could have significant consequences for oil markets, including for the U.S. shale industry and producer economies in OPEC and beyond.
As the pandemic rebound loses steam, clean energy transitions advance, and the structure of Chinas economy shifts, growth in global oil demand is slowing down and set to reach its peak by 2030, the IEAs Birol said in a statement.
This reports projections, based on the latest data, show a major supply surplus emerging this decade, suggesting that oil companies may want to make sure their business strategies and plans are prepared for the changes taking place, he added.
The report comes as countries seek to move away from fossil fuels, with momentum building behind clean and energy-saving technologies. The burning of fossil fuels such as coal, oil and gas is the chief driver of the climate crisis.
The share of fossil fuels in the global energy supply has stayed at around 80% for decades, according to the IEA, although it expects this to drop to around 73% by 2030.
[B]Oil demand in advanced economies to fall further[/b]
Despite the projected slowdown in oil demand growth, the IEA noted that in the absence of stronger policy measures or behavioral changes, crude demand is still expected to be around 3.2 million barrels per day higher by 2030 than in 2023.
It said this growth is largely driven by robust demand from fast-growing economies in Asia, as well as the aviation and petrochemical sectors.
In advanced economies, however, the IEA says oil demand is on course to dip below 43 million barrels per day by 2030, down from close to 46 million barrels per day last year. Aside from the coronavirus pandemic, the IEA said the last time oil demand from advanced economies was that low was in 1991.
In a landmark 2021 report, the IEA had urged against new oil, gas or coal developments if the world is to achieve net zero by 2050.
The findings of that report were widely criticized by several OPEC+ producers, who advocate for dual investment in hydrocarbons and renewables, until green energy can unilaterally fulfill global consumption needs.
Led by Saudi Arabia, OPEC+ refers to an influential energy alliance composed of OPEC and non-OPEC partners.[/QUOTE]1. Trump said his 2nd term Dictatorship Plans have two goals; Drill Baby Drill and Close the Border. LOL. As is typical for Do Nothing, Know Nothing, Deadbeat Repubs, he is way too late; Dem POTUS Biden has already shouldered all of the heavy lifting and assumed all of the political risk to accomplish part one, brilliantly, and it is only Trump and his lick-spittal obedient lackey Congressional Repubs who love Open Borders so much a bi-partisan, ultra Conservative Comprehensive and Lasting Immigration and Border Security Legislation is not in place this very minute.
2. Trump is great and highly skilled at lowering gas prices by producing Trump's Pandemic Closures, along with wiping out Millions Upon Millions of Jobs, Crashing Stock Markets, Killing Millions of People Around the World, but does not know shit about how to do it during one of the greatest post-Repub Great Economic Disaster Great Dem Recoveries, Economic Expansions and Historic Jobs Creation.
3. Being a Dem, Joe Biden knows what to do about it, knows how to it and WILL do it.
4. Even if Trump's handlers had sat him down and somehow managed to keep him awake for 20 minutes to show him the usual 3-panel stick figure cartoon illustration he needs to have anything explained to him and he eventually DID understand what needed to be done in order to accomplish this historic masterpiece of energy stabilization and OPEC-Killing brilliance accomplished by Joe Biden, he would not do it.
That isn't what Repubs do. They do not put America First this way or any other way. Ever. Trump is more interested in being personally renumerated by his usual means of publicly siding with and blowing America's adversaries and enemies for it.
-
Speaking of Cry Babies...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2922144][b]Oh, those poor babies, Big Oil and OPEC [/b]
Thanks again, Joe:
[b]Big Oil given stark warning as a major crude supply surplus expected by 2030.
June 12, 2024[/b]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/12/big-oil-given-stark-warning-as-a-major-supply-surplus-expected-by-2030.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
...
That isn't what Repubs do. [i][b]They do not put America First this way or any other way. [u]Ever.[/u][/b][/i] Trump is more interested in being personally renumerated by his usual means of publicly siding with and blowing America's adversaries and enemies for it.
[/QUOTE]
It's remarkable how Biden's and the Dems administration has held up to stellar adherence and respect for great governance, stewardship, democratic rights and the Rule of Law, amidst the Repub clown show and Russian "useful idiots".
Take the recent example of contrasts in reactions to GUILTY verdicts in the Trump [i][b]"Hush Money Campaign Violations"[/b][/i] vs Hunter [i][b]"Gun Drugged Laptop Dick Pics"[/b][/i] trials:
[LIST]On the LEFT:
- No demanding a change of venue, prosecutor (who BTW was a Trump-appointed Repub U.S. attorney, left in place by Joe Biden) or judge
- No whining from the Dems, no complaints about the DOJ from Biden family
- No endless chants of "rigged"
- No rants, threats or calls of revenge
- No calls for violence, or for riots and mayhem in the streets
- Just a concise statement, by a law abiding POTUS, to say [b]he loves his son[/b] and [b]will be respecting the judgment and Rule of Law[/b] [/LIST]Now contrast that with the those on the right:
[LIST]On the RIGHT:
- The constant whining about a change of venue upstate, change of prosecutors and/or judge (because Trump wanted a loyalist "rigged" judge like Alieen Cannon)
- The constant attempts to use all kinds of partisan political capital to pervert justice and court proceedings.
- The constant drone of whining from wannabe Veeps, Trump sycophants and QAnon\MAGA cultists.
- The constant lying of hack journalists and pundits over at the Repub propaganda machine at FOXY Muse.
- The constant chants of "rigged", "scam", "injustice", "travesty" and a blatant disregard for the Rule of Law.
- The loopy conspiracists, all over the internet (and ISG), spouting rubbish, nonsense and their Russian led disinformation.
- Trump rants, threatens and calls for a "revenge" style dictatorship, should he win in Nov 2024.
- Trump stochastic rhetoric and coded language, calls of retribution and mayhem in the streets, if convicted[/LIST]
[b]America Should Appreciate How Joe Biden Handled His Sons Trial[/b]
[URL]https://www.thebulwark.com/p/america-should-appreciate-how-joe[/URL]
Yes, what a difference a trial makes w/r to abiding by and respecting the Criminal Justice System, DOJ and the Rule of Law, and not just when it suits your own agenda, to abide by the law!
President Joe Biden, shows Americans, yet another [b]proud example of how a man worthy of being called POTUS[/b] and hold the highest office in the country, should conduct themselves, even in personal hardship and adversity, when dealing with the law and the criminal justice system.
Unlike his childish "cry baby" predecessor, President Joe Biden's acceptance, respect and noninterference with the Rule of Law, once again reaffirms that, [u][b]NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW![/b][/u]
I wonder how much the Repub cry babies will whine at Trump's sentencing?
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2922235]
Yes, what a difference a trial makes w/r to abiding by and respecting the Criminal Justice System, DOJ and the Rule of Law, and not just when it suits your own agenda, to abide by the law!
President Joe Biden, shows Americans, yet another [b]proud example of how a man worthy of being called POTUS[/b] and hold the highest office in the country, should conduct themselves, even in personal hardship and adversity, when dealing with the law and the criminal justice system.
Unlike his childish "cry baby" predecessor, President Joe Biden's acceptance, respect and noninterference with the Rule of Law, once again reaffirms that, [u][b]NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW![/b][/u]
I wonder how much the Repub cry babies will whine at Trump's sentencing?[/QUOTE]You must have missed the part about how no one was celebrating Hunter Biden going to jail. That is because this is the most innocuous and obvious of charges. The real issue was the 10% for "the big guy" and all that that entailed. This case was just a distraction.
It is one thing to say "no one is above the law" but when you prosecute someone with a law you literally made up just to get Trump, that rings on deaf ears. Only thing Hunter Biden is good for is that it shows Dems can go to jail too now.
But Matt Taibbi wrote it better than I could:
Last Thursday, a federal court ordered former chief strategist for Donald Trump, podcaster, and symbol of All Things Evil Steve Bannon jailed for defiance of a Congressional subpoena. Convicted in 2022 for refusing to appear before a House Committee investigating the January 6th Capitol riot, Bannon on July 1st will join former Trump aide Peter Navarro in a select group of Americans jailed for contempt of Congress since the meat-grinder days of McCarthy and the House Un-American Affairs Committee (HUAC).
Detractors cheered the timely benching of the host of War Room, which generates millions of downloads as the most influential pro-Trump media program. "Steve Bannon being off the air. Is actually very good for the pro-democracy movement," chortled political strategist Rick Wilson, noting that while Bannon was going away for four months, they're "four vital months. ".
Welcome to the Third World, America. We crossed a big line in the last two weeks, first with the conviction of a presidential frontrunner on comic-book charges, now the revival of a contempt of Congress maneuver we haven't seen since the Hollywood Ten. Nobody's been sent to a logging camp or car-bombed or given a hot lead cure in a doorway, but as any current or former resident of authoritarian countries will tell you, the jailing of political opponents is a sure sign we're on that road.
I returned to America a year after 9/11, following a decade in the burgeoning Russian autocracy of Boris Yeltsin and Vladimir Putin. That experience allowed me to see how quickly even limited freedoms of speech or assembly can be vaporized. People blinded by dislike of Trump or Bannon should imagine trying to summon sympathy for people like Vladimir Gusinsky and Misha Khodorkovsky, oligarchs who got rich in very dubious privatization schemes but were early targets of political prosecutions in the Putin years (Gusinsky was raided by armed agents four months after Putin's inauguration). For those protesting that Bannon is only headed inside because he's scum who broke the law, political prosecutions always involve a legal violation, often even a real one. Americans just don't know what that looks like. End of link.
It is funny how you Democratic douches so dislike Putin while acting like him.
So Rachel Meadow is afraid of going to jail if Trump wins and why not. Maybe we can bankrupt her like the left did Alex Jones if not throw her in jail. [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/msnbcs-maddow-says-shes-worried-trump-will-put-her-concentration-camp[/URL].
And now Merrick Garland is likely to go to jail if Trump wins too. [URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/12/us/politics/house-garland-attorney-general-biden-contempt.html[/URL].
You can't send Peter Navarro and Steve Bannon to jail and not send Garland. Hell, Garland should serve more time then those two given what he has done. By not releasing the Biden audio, isn't Garland trying to rig an election? Hell, it has already been reported the transcript and audio of Biden's interview do not match.
Seeing as how New York has found Trump guilty for election fraud, maybe we here in Texas should do the same with Biden. As we learned from New York, we too can prosecute federal offenses. It does not matter if the Feds do nothing. The Feds did nothing with Trump.
Hell, you dumb Dems cheered on making up a law none of you understood to get Trump and were so fucking clueless and arrogant. Like Taibbi said, it is easy to make up laws and prosecute people when they break them. You are literally cheering on a banana republic.
Maybe you do not know this, but you put people in jail who are a threat to others. You do not put them there because you do not like them. It is amazing to see an idiot monger like yourself cheering on rule of law when if it were truly applied, your sorry ass would have been in jail for soliciting a prostitute.
-
Every other GOP effort regarding Biden and his family fell apart. Badly.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2922235]It's remarkable how Biden's and the Dems administration has held up to stellar adherence and respect for great governance, stewardship, democratic rights and the Rule of Law, amidst the Repub clown show and Russian "useful idiots".
Take the recent example of contrasts in reactions to GUILTY verdicts in the Trump [i][b]"Hush Money Campaign Violations"[/b][/i] vs Hunter [i][b]"Gun Drugged Laptop Dick Pics"[/b][/i] trials:
[LIST]On the LEFT:
- No demanding a change of venue, prosecutor (who BTW was a Trump-appointed Repub U.S. attorney, left in place by Joe Biden) or judge
- No whining from the Dems, no complaints about the DOJ from Biden family
- No endless chants of "rigged"
- No rants, threats or calls of revenge
- No calls for violence, or for riots and mayhem in the streets
- Just a concise statement, by a law abiding POTUS, to say [b]he loves his son[/b] and [b]will be respecting the judgment and Rule of Law[/b] [/LIST]Now contrast that with the those on the right:
[LIST]On the RIGHT:
- The constant whining about a change of venue upstate, change of prosecutors and/or judge (because Trump wanted a loyalist "rigged" judge like Alieen Cannon)
- The constant attempts to use all kinds of partisan political capital to pervert justice and court proceedings.
- The constant drone of whining from wannabe Veeps, Trump sycophants and QAnon\MAGA cultists.
- The constant lying of hack journalists and pundits over at the Repub propaganda machine at FOXY Muse.
- The constant chants of "rigged", "scam", "injustice", "travesty" and a blatant disregard for the Rule of Law.
- The loopy conspiracists, all over the internet (and ISG), spouting rubbish, nonsense and their Russian led disinformation.
- Trump rants, threatens and calls for a "revenge" style dictatorship, should he win in Nov 2024.
- Trump stochastic rhetoric and coded language, calls of retribution and mayhem in the streets, if convicted[/LIST]
[b]America Should Appreciate How Joe Biden Handled His Sons Trial[/b]
[URL]https://www.thebulwark.com/p/america-should-appreciate-how-joe[/URL]
Yes, what a difference a trial makes w/r to abiding by and respecting the Criminal Justice System, DOJ and the Rule of Law, and not just when it suits your own agenda, to abide by the law!
President Joe Biden, shows Americans, yet another [b]proud example of how a man worthy of being called POTUS[/b] and hold the highest office in the country, should conduct themselves, even in personal hardship and adversity, when dealing with the law and the criminal justice system.
Unlike his childish "cry baby" predecessor, President Joe Biden's acceptance, respect and noninterference with the Rule of Law, once again reaffirms that, [u][b]NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW![/b][/u]
I wonder how much the Repub cry babies will whine at Trump's sentencing?[/QUOTE]The whiny, desperate MAGA Trump Cult Repub congress' "10% for the big guy" horseshit fell apart so badly and embarrassingly they now have to twist and turn themselves into numbskull Taibbi Pretzels in order to spin this one into a Poor Baby Persecuted America-hating Trump and Repubs Pity Party.
LOL. But they will keep trying. What else have they got? Trump without a teleprompter is, at best, a blithering, confused and babbling reteller of Shark Week and scary Heavy Boat Battery tales of terror.
-
Latest Polls Suggest, Biden is close to a coin-toss in Florida...
For those who like to follow the polls, they have Joe Biden, making significant gains in the POLLS in Florida...[b]But Why?[/b]
Trump's is fast losing ground and his lead appears be shrinking in his home state of Florida, to Biden and the Dems, who are now seeing a strong trend, towards retaking and winning Florida, with a odds of a coin-flip.
Why the sudden change in the (FL) polls for Biden, well that anyone's guess? But if I were to venture a guess, I'd say it would be an out pouring of WOMEN, college students and young Floridians, that will also turnout in droves for "ABORTION" and "MARIJUANA" down ballot voting.
And in-the-wake of the GUILTY verdict, the majority of INDEPENDENT voters, are turning to President Joe Biden, and don't want a criminal and felon as their next president.
[b]Donald Trump Gets Troubling News in Home State Poll[/b]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-news-florida-poll-1912057[/URL]
[u]Here is one (1) other thought that comes to my mind:[/u]
IMHO, it also appears [i](if it isn't already obvious to anyone)[/i], now that Trump is campaigning again, the nonsensical shit flowing from his trap (cake-hole), is on steroids. I mean, the more the dude, talks (babbles), the more dumb shit come out of his mouth and the more people remember what a buffoon he really is.
Is it any wonder, he DID NOT take the stand to defend his "innocence", in his Hush Money criminal conviction trial?
-
The Biggest Customer in the World Resurrected Trump's Supply-Chain Collapse
Thanks again and again and again, Joe.
Not only has Bidenomics produced the greatest recovery from Trump's Pandemic in the USA compared to evert other country on the planet, it is the driving force behind averting another worldwide Great Repub Depression.
Shhh. Please, please don't anybody tell Larry Summers or any numbskull who references a Larry Summers idiocy about how Bidenomics was a dime or two too much ecomomic stimulation to pull The World out of the historic global disaster of Trump's Pandemic:
[B]BUSINESS
World Bank: Impressive US economy is powering the world.
June 11, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/business/4715951-world-bank-impressive-us-economy-is-powering-the-world/[/URL]
[QUOTE]The World Bank upgraded its outlook for the global economy and said the impressive U.S. economy is powering the world.
The latest outlook estimates the global economy will expand 2.6 percent, an increase from the 2.4 percent growth predicted for the year.
In the foreword of the World Banks latest economic outlook, Indermit Gill, the groups senior vice president and chief economist, said the global economy appears to be approaching a soft landing in 2024, meaning a global recession has been avoided despite having the steepest rise in global interest rates since the 1980s.
One of the driving factors, Gill outlined, is the U.S. economy.
The U.S. economy, in particular, has shown impressive resilience, Gill wrote. Growth has remained buoyant in the teeth of the fiercest monetary policy tightening in four decades.
The U.S. economy is one of the reasons that the World Bank expects the global economy will enjoy some upside potential over the next two years, he wrote.
Ayhan Kose, the banks deputy chief economist, told The Associated Press that U.S. growth is exceptional.
And more[/QUOTE]LOL. Just imagine how howling at the moon desperate Trump and his fellow Know Nothing, Do Nothing, Deadbeat, "always always always take credit for the magnificent achievements of Dems who shoulder all of the heavy lifting and assume all of the political risk" Repubs to get in there by hook, crook, lying and committing multiple felonies to steal the next election so they can once again claim totally undeserved and unearned credit for the spectacular USA and WORLD Economy the next POTUS will inherit from this current Dem POTUS and spend all their time playing golf, riding ponies, playing golf, clearing brush down at the ranch, playing golf, sleeping and playing golf!
When they are not publicly siding with and blowing Putin, Xi and every other adversary and enemy of America and scouring the landscape for any potential "Once in 100 Years Disaster" to embrace, exacerbate and plague America and the rest of the world with, that is.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2922286]The whiny, desperate MAGA Trump Cult Repub congress' "10% for the big guy" horseshit fell apart so badly and embarrassingly they now have to twist and turn themselves into numbskull Taibbi Pretzels in order to spin this one into a Poor Baby Persecuted America-hating Trump and Repubs Pity Party.[/QUOTE]LOL. Yeah, half a billion in donations is whining. That is called putting your money where your mouth is. The whining was going on for the left with Rachel mad cow Meadow who will be bankrupted or put in jail if Trump wins office. You Democratic douches have ruled a porn star hooker and criminal, who will say anything to get out of jail, can be believed. Nothing says preserving Democracy like jailing your opponent, trashing the 6th Amendment, tossing guilty until proven innocent, and having a highly partisan jury inset itself into an election. Truth is you Democratic douches love Putin and Xi and their one party rule. That is literally what you are hoping for. You call telling the truth "whining."
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2922286]But they will keep trying. What else have they got? Trump without a teleprompter is, at best, a blithering, confused and babbling reteller of Shark Week and scary Heavy Boat Battery tales of terror. The good news is today the USA has more and better paying jobs abundantly available. [/QUOTE]OMG. Nothing like someone from Thailand telling us how great things are in the USA. Maybe you have been talking to the family of Thais who have relatives who have moved into the USA illegally, but I suspect it is due to your must have missed a few things considering where you get your information.
Here is one headline you must have missed, Over 100% of the Increase in Employment Since 2020 is Foreign Born, [URL]https://mishtalk.com/economics/over-100-of-the-increase-in-employment-since-2020-is-foreign-born/[/URL]
And that was from four months ago. Yesterday, even the chairman of the Federal Reserve called Biden's job reports overstated.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/fed-chair-powell-admits-biden-admin-overstating-jobs[/URL]
While the Establishment Survey did indeed report that 272 K "jobs" were added, this number also included multiple job holders; stripping those out, we get that the actual number of "employed" workers plunged by 408 K.
But how is it possible that payrolls rose nearly 300 K while overall employment tumbled by more than 400 K? Well, this is where another propaganda gimmick so frequently abused by the BLS comes into play: the birth death adjustment, a statistical fudge factor that imputes job growth for any given month based on the entirely subjective assumption made by a group of pro-Biden bureaucrats of how many new businesses were created (or destroyed) in the US economy any given moment.
More astounding is that the Birth-Death imputation has resulted in 56% of all "payroll growth", or 1. 9 million statistical "payrolls" in the past year, when according to the BLS a total of 3. 4 million "payrolls" were crated.
While one can debate the quantitative aspects of the jobs report, there is no debating the qualitative: there it's one giant disaster: as we learned in May, whatever the actual number of payrolls (again, not jobs) added, what we know is that the trend of full-time to part-time worker conversions continues, with 625 K full-time jobs lost in May, offset by 286 K part-time jobs. Which is hardly a new trend: in fact, over the past year, the US has lost 1. 2 million full-time jobs, replaced with 1. 5 million part-time jobs.
Finally, there is the data point which we first highlighted more than a year ago, and which has since emerged as the biggest political talking point involving the labor market: the fact that since 2018, the US has created exactly zero native-born jobs, and all the job growth has gone to foreign-born workers.
Here is Powell defending all job gains since 2018 going to immigrants / non-native born workers:
PELLEY: Why was immigration important?
POWELL: Because, you know, immigrants come in, and they tend to work at a rate that is at or above that for non-immigrants.
And as Edward Snowden put it so eloquently, is that he's "not sure I've ever seen the chairman of the Federal Reserve publicly accuse the White House of cooking the books on employment numbers, but here we are. ".
Yes, the one place in the world where you are free to be critical of the USA government is Russia.
And that along with the ridiculously high costs of rent is why Biden will lose. Thank God, it's the economy stupid, James Carville, is not whining about the economic plight of young Americans and the American working poor Biden wants to obliterate.
-
SNL "nails" Trump and his Hush Money crimes, some six (6) years ago...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2922249]It is one thing to say "no one is above the law" but when you prosecute someone with a law you literally made up just to get Trump, that rings on deaf ears. Only thing Hunter Biden is good for is that it shows Dems can go to jail too now. ... [/QUOTE]
Elvis 2008, well I'll say one thing, you certainly are a chip of the ol' gobbledegook Trump block. I mean, you couldn't sound more like Trump. Meaning, the more you talk, the more incoherent, blathering, blithering, nonsensical and conspiratorial QAnon/MAGA, Russian political "useful idiot", you become.
Pretty soon, Jewish space laser shooting, Russia's No.2 most "useful idiot", Moscow Marjorie (aka.Capital Hill Karen, aka.Cruella DeVil on the Hill), won't hold a candle to your nonsense. (....kkkk!)
I guess it was the same [i][b]"made up law"[/b][/i], that Michael Cohn, lied for Trump and on behalf of Trump, w/r to the very same crime, 6-years ago.
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/michael-cohen-prison-sentence-explained-1899848[/URL]
[URL]https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-crime-new-york-manhattan-campaigns-3a0413202e80ab99c9f6377f97d07c04[/URL]
Here's a GREAT SNL Video, 6-years ago, yes pre-May 2024 Trump Hush Money trial. In true SNL brilliance...they "nailed it"! It's funny how SNL & EVERYONE else (except conspiracists such yourself), knew the extent of his Hush Money crimes and the laws he was breaking, 6-years earlier. It was as plain as daylight, for everyone to see.
This should help you refresh your memory of the convict/felon Trump's crimes and the "made up law" he violated. [b]SNL: [/b][URL]www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1K8s-tQGqY[/URL]
I know I had a good chuckle, at how accurate the skit was and how so "in-the-money" and "on-the-money", SNL were.
[u]Who's Celebrating What Now?: [/u]
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2922249]Maybe you do not know this, but you put people in jail who are a threat to others. You do not put them there because you do not like them. It is amazing to see an
idiot monger like yourself cheering on rule of law when if it were truly applied, your sorry ass would have been in jail for soliciting a prostitute. [/QUOTE]
So now Elvis 2008, your saying, you and Repubs don't want to follow the Rule of Law?
If memory serves, it was [b]YOU, Elvis 2008,[/b] that was waving the pom-poms and doing all the [b]cheering[/b] and [b]celebrating[/b], a GUILTY verdict.
[LIST]If I recall:
- It was YOU, Elvis 2008, that was [b]bloviating[/b] about the $400+ million new reasons to celebrate, a GUILTY verdict.
- It was your [b]"Paycheck Superhero"[/b] dumbass, that got on the phone and wanted to donate all your mongering and prostitute dollars, to reward Trump with a GUILTY verdict.
- It was YOU, Elvis 2008, and your INCEL consipiracist, QAnon\MAGA sycophant notions, that most assuredly told us Dems, [i]"...Oh you guys have fucked up now and given Repubs a reason to come together",[/i] with regards to a GUILTY verdict.[/LIST]So now ask yourself, Elvis 2008, if a GUILTY verdict has Trump, "reuniting" the Repubs and those same gullible Repubs have put $400+ million in his campaign coffers, [b]what exactly is it[/b], that the "Paycheck Superhero" and conspiracist Elvis 2008, ...is whining about?
-
Shark Week blubbering metaphors?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2922286]The whiny, desperate MAGA Trump Cult Repub congress' "10% for the big guy" horseshit fell apart so badly and embarrassingly they now have to twist and turn themselves into numbskull Taibbi Pretzels in order to spin this one into a Poor Baby Persecuted America-hating Trump and Repubs Pity Party.
LOL. But they will keep trying. What else have they got? Trump without a teleprompter is, at best, a blithering, confused and [b]babbling reteller of Shark Week[/b] and scary Heavy Boat Battery tales of terror.[/QUOTE]Didn't know what the hell Trump's fascination with Sharks were, until I re-watched the SNL video (time index: 6:51) [URL]https://youtu.be/K1K8s-tQGqY?t=410[/URL], where Alec Balwin (masterfully imitating Trump) says to Stormy Daniels, [B]"...we'll always have Shark Week"[/B] (...kkkk!)
[B]Sex, Shark Week, and Hush Money: A Trump and Stormy Daniels Timeline [/B](March 21st, 2023).
[URL]https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-stormy-daniels-timeline-1234700886/[/URL]
Now I am pretty sure Stormy Daniels' vivid recollection of Trump's nutty obsession with sharks and Shark Week, was an indelible moment, that impart, was Trump's undoing.
So when the blithering, blabbering and confused Trump, retells dying as shark chum or by heavy electric batteries in a sinking ship, one has to wonder, was he hearkening back somewhat to Stormy Daniels?
And is the shark a metaphor for the DOJ and the sinking ship, a metaphor for the RNC? And what about the electric batteries?
Perhaps our resident conspiracist (a chip of the ol' block), can help us out, on Russia's No.1 "useful idiot", Shark Week, electric batteries and sinking ships incoherent rants and blubberings?
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2922519]
So when the blithering, blabbering and confused Trump[/QUOTE]You must be talking about creepy, sleepy Joe you idiot.
-
Hard Right Winger Magazine Dares To Tell The Truth re Polls vs Elections
Would you rather have a Polling Problem or an Election Problem?
Actually, Biden dosn't even have much of a Polling Problem if you believe demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics' unforgiving No Toss Up States Electoral College Map, its own Consensus of Polls results for Biden vs Trump in the only 3 Battleground states Biden needs to win 270 EC Votes as well as the same in the 538 Polling site; Even if the election were held tomorrow, Biden would only need to close or beat the miniscule Trump 1 to 2. 3 point or less Polling advantage he has in those states to secure a much deserved and well-earned 2nd term win.
Can a 1 to 2. 3 point or less advantage in a demonstrably Winger-leaning polling service and others be surmounted on any election day?
Yep. Quite easily. The truth of that has even finally been admitted by a hard right Winger online magazine. And Dems have been outperforming their polling numbers by at least that much vs Trump and his endorsed candidates in elections since he stole the 2016 election:
[B]Ignore The Polls. Republicans Have A Major Voter Turnout Problem.
June 12, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://thefederalist.com/2024/06/12/ignore-the-polls-republicans-have-a-major-voter-turnout-problem/[/URL]
Trump's daughter-in-law must be shifting all that dumb sucker Repub hillbilly donation money from their gub'ment entitlement checks and the big money donations from Corporate Elite CEOs who share a hearty laugh with Trump over the Repub Supply-Side / Trickle-Down scam they love to pull on, say, tip-earning workers in Nevada right into Trump's pocket to keep his failing golf resorts afloat.
Because it doesn't seem to be going into building a meaningful Ground Game presence in those battleground states.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2922512]
So now Elvis 2008, your saying, you and Repubs don't want to follow the Rule of Law?
If memory serves, it was [b]YOU, Elvis 2008,[/b] that was waving the pom-poms and doing all the [b]cheering[/b] and [b]celebrating[/b], a GUILTY verdict.
[LIST]If I recall:
- It was YOU, Elvis 2008, that was [b]bloviating[/b] about the $400+ million new reasons to celebrate, a GUILTY verdict.
- It was your [b]"Paycheck Superhero"[/b] dumbass, that got on the phone and wanted to donate all your mongering and prostitute dollars, to reward Trump with a GUILTY verdict.
- It was YOU, Elvis 2008, and your INCEL consipiracist, QAnon\MAGA sycophant notions, that most assuredly told us Dems, [i]"...Oh you guys have fucked up now and given Repubs a reason to come together",[/i] with regards to a GUILTY verdict.[/LIST]So now ask yourself, Elvis 2008, if a GUILTY verdict has Trump, "reuniting" the Repubs and those same gullible Repubs have put $400+ million in his campaign coffers, [b]what exactly is it[/b], that the "Paycheck Superhero" and conspiracist Elvis 2008, ...is whining about?[/QUOTE]I guess you missed the part where "rule of law" means you go to jail. You have to be a fucking narcissist not to understand that. Or maybe I am wrong, and you are not monger at all but some gay tranny living in his mom's basement where all you care about is who wins an election because you have no life.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2922512]I guess it was the same [i][b]"made up law"[/b][/i], that Michael Cohn, lied for Trump and on behalf of Trump, w/r to the very same crime, 6-years ago.
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/michael-cohen-prison-sentence-explained-1899848[/URL]
[URL]https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-crime-new-york-manhattan-campaigns-3a0413202e80ab99c9f6377f97d07c04[/URL]
Here's a GREAT SNL Video, 6-years ago, yes pre-May 2024 Trump Hush Money trial. In true SNL brilliance...they "nailed it"! It's funny how SNL & EVERYONE else (except conspiracists such yourself), knew the extent of his Hush Money crimes and the laws he was breaking, 6-years earlier. It was as plain as daylight, for everyone to see.
This should help you refresh your memory of the convict/felon Trump's crimes and the "made up law" he violated. [b]SNL: [/b][URL]www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1K8s-tQGqY[/URL].[/QUOTE]Well, Soy Boy, it is good what you think of as porn because this SNL skit was as realistic as porn. Rule of law is Stormy Daniels pays back every fucking dime she owes Trump because she broke her signed NDA. Yeah, Soy Boy, your idea of a female hero is Stormy Daniels who got $140,000 to do nothing other than shut her mouth and then started flapping her gums once she saw there was more money in it. Once she was caught going back on her word, she was sued for $500,000 and an was sued and lost and then engaged in the same kind of financial engineering Trump was accused of such that she did not have to pay him back. Oh yes, Trump wants that woman, a woman the age of a Grandma who needs makeup put on by the pound to look halfway decent. The reality is more that Trump would rather run her over with a truck than have sex with her.
And like any hooker, she will tell you whatever you want to hear based on who is paying her. So here we go again with her having sex with Trump after she signed a statement saying she did not have sex with him. So here is another law Stormy Daniels has broken and instead of reacting with outrage, you think Trump and Republicans dream of having a woman as great as Stormy. No doubt to you she is a strong woman Spidy. In reality, she is a lying, attention seeking, law breaking, stealing worthless deadbeat over the hill hooker. Does she have anything going for herself outside of fucking Trump twenty years ago?
And Melania Trump wants out of her marriage and went to Cohen to talk about it? Yeah, okay. Nothing says you hate your husband like having a child with him and standing by him. She stood by him even when Trump had competition for the nomination. How much is Melania in line to make off Truth Social? One billion? Two? Oh yeah, women hate a man who makes them billions of dollars. And this skit was put out before Truth social went public. Melania wants out? She does not want her sons's father in his life. How fucking stupid is that? That said prediction was dead wrong does not matter to you Spidy because to you this type of porn is real.
And Micheal Cohen is not the tax cheat, the thief, the convicted liar, the pathetic loser hanging onto the Trump coat tails who longed to be AG and lied about it. No, he is the straight man, the only rational person in the crazy Trump world and was dragged along by Trump's egomanical ways. He did not come up with the payment scheme. He just went along for the ride. He was a victim. Give me a fucking break.
And there was the doctor bit about the records being taken. "I couldn't believe anybody was making a big deal out of a drug to grow his hair that seemed to be so important. And it certainly was not a breach of medical trust to tell somebody they take Propecia to grow their hair. What's the matter with that?" he told NBC News.
Gee, what is the matter with that? Let's let a doctor go who is breaking the law, in this case a HIPAA violation. You are not allowed to talk about what drugs a patient of yours is taken. Unfucking real. Hey, Spidy, Mr. Rule of Law, do you have any witness against Trump who has not broken a fucking law?
And anytime anyone of you douches get a group of people lying like we just saw here, and we Republicans go against them, it is a conspiracy theory. The list of so called conspiracy theories is so long now I have lost count. The creation of the Covid virus was funded by Fauci, Hunter's drug use and Russian disinformation, government censorship in social media, government promoting the Covid vaccine when government knew it did not work, NIH scientists making billions off of a vaccine they know did not work, Ivermectin being a dangerous horse dewormer, Ukraine being a winnable victory ETC. The list goes on and on.
On another forum, this Democratic douche Viliany tried to make it out like the FEC with three Repubicans and three Democrats was a corrupt organization. Yes, the Democratic douche version of rule of law is an all Democratic jury like in Manhattan.
The part that cannot get sink into your soy soaked head Spidy is my POV is agreed with by half of America. I did not give $400 million myself Soy Boy.
You want rule of law mo fo? We are going to give it to you. You send a fucking SWAT team to the Trump house with orders to shoot to kill if anyone gets in your way, we are going to make sure that whatever Trump is charged with Biden gets the exact same punishment. You send Bannon and Navarro to jail for contempt of Congress. Merrick Garland goes to jail too. When Alex Jones is pushed into bankruptcy by some Democratic judge, we will make sure the exact same fate occurs with Rachel Meadow and a Republican judge.
And you are so full of shit, you post about "rule of law" on a monger board. You are so fucking arrogant, so full of shit, the thought that you could be convicted and jailed for breaking the law for being a monger does not even register. When you say rule of law, what you really mean is applying grace to Democratic douches while hammering Republicans with the law.
Well, that is not what rule of law means you dumb fuck. Rule of law means every monger here goes to jail.
-
Polls...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2922541]Would you rather have a Polling Problem or an Election Problem?
Actually, Biden dosn't even have much of a Polling Problem if you believe demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics' unforgiving No Toss Up States Electoral College Map, its own Consensus of Polls results for Biden vs Trump in the only 3 Battleground states Biden needs to win 270 EC Votes as well as the same in the 538 Polling site; Even if the election were held tomorrow, Biden would only need to close or beat the miniscule Trump 1 to 2. 3 point or less Polling advantage he has in those states to secure a much deserved and well-earned 2nd term win.
Can a 1 to 2. 3 point or less advantage in a demonstrably Winger-leaning polling service and others be surmounted on any election day?
Yep. Quite easily. The truth of that has even finally been admitted by a hard right Winger online magazine. And Dems have been outperforming their polling numbers by at least that much vs Trump and his endorsed candidates in elections since he stole the 2016 election:
[B]Ignore The Polls. Republicans Have A Major Voter Turnout Problem.
June 12, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://thefederalist.com/2024/06/12/ignore-the-polls-republicans-have-a-major-voter-turnout-problem/[/URL]
Trump's daughter-in-law must be shifting all that dumb sucker Repub hillbilly donation money from their gub'ment entitlement checks and the big money donations from Corporate Elite CEOs who share a hearty laugh with Trump over the Repub Supply-Side / Trickle-Down scam they love to pull on, say, tip-earning workers in Nevada right into Trump's pocket to keep his failing golf resorts afloat.
Because it doesn't seem to be going into building a meaningful Ground Game presence in those battleground states.[/QUOTE]
Good read on polls and how they are often viewed and misused in politics.
[QUOTE] If you read nothing but posts from conservative influencers on X, youd be convinced that Donald Trump has already won the 2024 election. ...there's no way Trump can lose, or so the
conventional thinking goes.
While its certainly possible the polls are accurate, the outcome of recent elections should give conservatives reason to pump the brakes on celebrating before any ballots have been cast.
[b]Case in point:[/b] A special election held in Ohios 6th Congressional District on Tuesday...While Rulli (Repub) defeated Kripchak (Dem) in Tuesdays matchup and expanded Republicans thin House majority, the election was much closer than originally predicted. Preliminary results indicate Rulli won the race by 9.4 points [b]a more than [u]20-point shift[/u] in Democrats favor...[/b]
[URL]https://thefederalist.com/2024/06/12/ignore-the-polls-republicans-have-a-major-voter-turnout-problem/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
In his article, Shawn Fleetwood, basically goes on to show [b]"the alarming voting trend towards Dems"[/b] and repeats what ISG Dems, have been saying for months.
The fantastic wins and gains for Democrats in the 2020, 2022, 2023 and 2024 elections, midterm elections, special elections and primaries, throughout the country (and not only in battleground states), is representative of how Americans have shifted or continue to vote for Dems, especially on key issues like when [b]abortion, IVF, contraception[/b] and [b]marijuana[/b] are on the ballot or hang in the balance.
[QUOTE] [b]Despite conservatives hype, [u]election polls are meaningless.[/u][/b] The only thing that matters in modern U.S. elections is getting ballots into boxes. Until Republicans learn to chase ballots and compete with the Democrats election machine, they can continue to expect to lose every significant election under the sun.
[URL]https://thefederalist.com/2024/06/12/ignore-the-polls-republicans-have-a-major-voter-turnout-problem/[/URL][/QUOTE]
Couldn't agree more! This one statement (above) in his article...sums it up![LIST]That when Repubs primarily chase an election win based on [i]"the (fake) polls"[/i], instead of ballots, Repubs like Trump, will only continue to [b]fail[/b] at the ballot-box, [b][i]"fall asleep at the wheel"[/i][/b] and inevitably, will only be fooling themselves![/LIST]
-
Wilson / Scaramucci
[QUOTE=Spidy;2922781]Good read on polls and how they are often viewed and misused in politics.
In his article, Shawn Fleetwood, basically goes on to show [b]"the alarming voting trend towards Dems"[/b] and repeats what ISG Dems, have been saying for months.
The fantastic wins and gains for Democrats in the 2020, 2022, 2023 and 2024 elections, midterm elections, special elections and primaries, throughout the country (and not only in battleground states), is representative of how Americans have shifted or continue to vote for Dems, especially on key issues like [b]abortion, IVF, contraception[/b] and [b]marijuana[/b] are on the ballot.
Couldn't agree more! This one statement (above) in his article...sums it up![LIST]That when Repubs primarily chase an election win based on [i]"the (fake) polls"[/i], instead of ballots, Repubs like Trump, will only continue to [b]fail[/b] at the ballot-box, [b][i]"fall asleep at the wheel"[/i][/b] and inevitably, will only be fooling themselves![/LIST][/QUOTE]Listened to Scaramucci on rick wilson on youtube about how it may be different than how things are portrayed with polls and media.
I thought their insight was very interesting. One of them said that in 2016, people didn't want to say they were voting for Trump out of fear of being alienated by their family / friends. Now in 2024, pretty much all the people who are going to vote for Trump, within the Republican party, are very much outspoken. And those who do not plan to vote for him, are in a state of silence out of fear of MAGA. I believe this to be true as well.
So I think he will have fewer votes than he did in 2020, and possibly even less than 2016. Time will tell. That's why I tell everyone to vote, don't care who they vote for. Just do it.
Pollsters and media like to have a close match. Ratings / revenues are better for it. They have a reason to keep things close.
-
A Modest Test For Sinclair Winger Broadcast Group
First, the Winger-owned Wall Street Jounal concocted a "report" about Joe Biden supposedly "slipping" mentally at a meeting that, no surprise, was comprised of known Repub liars' opinion and no truth-telling Dem opinion. Including one well-documented Repub former Squeaker of the House who was known to have made a similar public statement that he totally contradicted in private:
[B]The Wall Street Journals story about Bidens mental acuity suffers from glaring problems.
June 6, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/06/media/wall-street-journal-biden-mental-acuity/index.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]The business broadsheet published and hyped a story Wednesday declaring that behind closed doors, President Joe Biden has shown signs of slipping. The story questioned Bidens mental acuity, playing into a GOP-propelled narrative that the 81-year-old president lacks the fitness to hold the nations highest office.
But an examination of the report reveals a glaring problem: Most of the sources reporters Annie Linskey and Siobhan Hughes relied on were Republicans. In fact, buried in the story, the reporters themselves acknowledged that they had drawn their sweeping conclusion based on GOP sources who, obviously, have an incentive to make comments that will damage Bidens candidacy.
..........
It is difficult to imagine that the newspaper, or any outlet, would run a similar story declaring that Trump is slipping behind the scenes based on the word of top Democratic figures despite the fact that the Democratic leadership has demonstrated a much stronger relationship with the truth in recent years than their Republican counterparts.
More broadly speaking, The Journals piece pointed to a continued problem roiling the news media as it covers the 2024 election. Trump is permitted to fall asleep in court and make nonsensical public statements on a routine basis without any serious questions raised about his mental acuity. Meanwhile, Biden is judged on an entirely different standard.[/QUOTE]Then, the Sinclair Winger Broadcast Group of local news outlets are caught repeating the Winger-owned WST bullshit "report" on their local outlets, which polls show viewers believe to be "more trustworthy" than the national outlets, apparently all reading from the exact same Winger script:
[B]Watch: Local Sinclair Anchors Read Same Shady Script on Bidens Age.
Local news anchors across the country are reading from the exact same script on Joe Biden.
June 11, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://newrepublic.com/post/182567/sinclair-right-wing-script-biden-age-local-news[/URL]
[QUOTE]Local television news broadcasters are airing suspiciously similar attacks on Joe Bidens mental acuity and how it will affect the coming electionand it appears to be part of a coordinated effort.
The Sinclair Broadcast Group owns or operates 185 local television stations across the country, and dozens of their stations aired a segment from national correspondent Matthew Galka citing a Wall Street Journal article that makes dubious attacks on Bidens age and mental awareness. The stations that aired the segment introduced it using startlingly similar, if not identical language, the Popular Information and Public Notice newsletters reported.[/QUOTE]And now we have this report in a couple of national news outlets:
[B]CEOs at Trump meeting say he was 'meandering,' 'doesn't know what he's talking about'.
June 14, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/14/ceos-at-trump-meeting-not-impressed.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]WASHINGTON Former President Donald Trump failed to impress everyone in a room full of top CEOs Thursday at the Business Roundtables quarterly meeting, multiple attendees told CNBC.
Trump doesnt know what hes talking about, said one CEO who was in the room, according to a person who heard the executive speaking. The CEO also said Trump did not explain how he planned to accomplish any of his policy proposals, that person said.
Several CEOs said that Trump was remarkably meandering, could not keep a straight thought and was all over the map, CNBCs Andrew Ross Sorkin reported Friday on CNBCs Squawk Box.
.........
The same CEOs who were struck by Trumps lack of focus walked into the meeting being Trump supporter-ish or thinking that they might be leaning that direction, Sorkin reported.
These were people who I think might have been actually predisposed to Trump but actually walked out of the room less predisposed to him, Sorkin said.
..........
Trumps energy in the meeting was also noticeably subdued, according to two people who were in the room. At no time during his remarks was there any noticeable applause for Trump, two attendees told CNBC.
[/QUOTE]So this is when the modest test of Sinclair Winger Broadcast Group begins. Do I even have to spell out what that "more trustworthy" local news test is? LOL.
-
Biden's stiff gait
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2922789]Listened to Scaramucci on rick wilson on youtube about how it may be different than how things are portrayed with polls and media.
I thought their insight was very interesting. One of them said that in 2016, people didn't want to say they were voting for Trump out of fear of being alienated by their family / friends. Now in 2024, pretty much all the people who are going to vote for Trump, within the Republican party, are very much outspoken. And those who do not plan to vote for him, are in a state of silence out of fear of MAGA. I believe this to be true as well.
So I think he will have fewer votes than he did in 2020, and possibly even less than 2016. Time will tell. That's why I tell everyone to vote, don't care who they vote for. Just do it.
Pollsters and media like to have a close match. Ratings / revenues are better for it. They have a reason to keep things close.[/QUOTE]Scaramucci is one of the very few commentators who usually bothers to point out that Biden's stiff gait is in large part due to the fact that he fractured his foot a few years ago and did not stay off of it long enough for it to fully return to normal, combined with other physical problems common to people in their 80's.
[B]Bidens Physical Says Hes Healthy and Vigorous, But Gait Remains Stiff[/B]
[URL]https://time.com/6256442/bidens-physical-healthy-gait-age/[/URL]
None of which has anything to do with his proven fitness to be one of the most accomplished Presidents in history, of course.
Biden himself does not generally offer any excuses for it nor does he expect any specual forgiveness or allowances for it. The same for his methods for brilliantly compensating for his early childhood stuttering problem, which sometimes manifests itself when he instantly substitutes a potential stutter trigger word or phrase for a perfectly acceptable alternative or takes a few seconds to choose the best way to most effectively answer a question that will avoid a potential stutter trigger.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2922711]
On another forum, this Democratic douche Viliany tried to make it out like the FEC with three Repubicans and three Democrats was a corrupt organization. Yes, the Democratic douche version of rule of law is an all Democratic jury like in Manhattan.
[/QUOTE]That was because you penned your latest fiction that the FEC had reviewed Trump's payoff scheme and exonerated him. Of course, this was patently untrue. But I guess anyone who challenged your revisionist recaps must be a Democratic douche.
I do have just one question for you Elvis. No value judgement here. Are you really Marjorie Taylor Greene in drag?
-
How "thin-skinned" are Donald J. Trump and his cult acolytes?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2922621]I guess you missed the part where "rule of law" means you go to jail. You have to be a fucking narcissist not to understand that. Or maybe I am wrong, and you are not monger at all but some gay tranny living in his mom's basement where all you care about is who wins an election because you have no life.[/QUOTE]
(....kkkk!) Struck a nerve did I? Or was it a major artery? (...kkkk!)
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008]...some gay tranny living in his mom's basement...[/QUOTE]
Is that the best you got...a weak-ass "mom's basement" line? Well, let's just say, [b][i]"...Look man, I ain't gonna fall for NO banana in my tail pipe!"[/i][/b] (...kkkk!) (...kkkk!)
[b]'Thin-skinned' Trump's courtroom meltdown is entirely predictable[/b], Nov 06, 2023
[QUOTE]...This case gets to something very close to his heart, which is his identity as a business tycoon, [b]and we know that he has pretty thin skin[/b], and so this is a test for him if he can remain composed...
[URL]https://www.rawstory.com/trump-fraud-trial-2666162637/[/URL][/QUOTE]
[b]The Joy of Making Trump Listen to Mean Tweets About Himself[/b], Apr 17th, 2024
[QUOTE]The vicious, [b]thin-skinned ex-president[/b] was forced to endure readings of social media posts by prospective jurors that mercilessly mocked him. It was great! ...
[URL]https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-joy-of-making-trump-listen-to-mean-tweets-about-himself[/URL][/QUOTE]
Yep, definitely a chip of the ol' Donand J. Trump "daddy block"! Meaning you, Elvis 2008, are [u][b]as thin skinned[/b][/u] as your "Loud and Save-ior" convict, criminal pussy-grabbing, blubbering dumbass ex-president!
But I could be wrong, as others have wondered and asked the question, [i]"Is that you, Moscow Marjorie?"[/i] And to be fair w/r to the question, it is getting harder to distinguish between, all of Russia's "useful idiots"!!! (...kkkk!)
[b]PS:[/b] Only thirsty and desperate ISGers (typically wingers), [b][i]with little to no imagination,[/i][/b] continually trot out, some version of the same ol' dumb, worn out and tired [i]"...living in his mom's basement..."[/i] line, as if it's the ultimate mic drop moment!
-
More Rubbish?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2922621]I guess you missed the part where "rule of law" means you go to jail...[/QUOTE]BTW, before I declare your statement (above), utter rubbish, [I][b]which or who's "rule of law"[/b][/I] are you dumbfoundingly referring to in scare quotes?
Is it the "rule of law" according to convict/felon Trump or INCEL Elvis 2008? Or is it the one, 340 million other law abiding Americans, answer to?
Or is this just more Elvis 2008, bemoaning a Trump GUILTY verdict and attempting sarcasm?
-
[QUOTE=Villainy;2922846]That was because you penned your latest fiction that the FEC had reviewed Trump's payoff scheme and exonerated him.[/QUOTE]The FEC did not fine Trump, and they find Hiliary for 2016. Enough said. You are engaged in an idiotic battle of semantics.
[QUOTE=Villainy;2922846]I do have just one question for you Elvis. No value judgement here. Are you really Marjorie Taylor Greene in drag?[/QUOTE]Is that supposed to be funny? You call me a liar and start with "no value judgement here". Is that your fucked up version of truth? You would not know truth if it hit you in the head.
But on to more important things, aren't you late for one of your Covid boosters? You still wearing a mask? Have you ventured out your Motel 6 in the last year? I remember you bragging about the towels there. Are they still all warm and fluffy? I think I can speak for all the guys here and say we were really jealous of you and your towels.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2922901]Or is it the one, 340 million other law abiding Americans, answer to?
Or is this just more Elvis 2008, bemoaning a Trump GUILTY verdict and attempting sarcasm?[/QUOTE]Do you work on being this stupid? The average American breaks three laws a day.
[URL]https://www.wholefoodsmagazine.com/articles/3161-three-felonies-a-day[/URL]
Just look through some 50 separate Titles of the United States Code, add those offenses together, and you will come up with at least 27,000 pages of crimes. That would be enough to be any attorney's nightmare, let alone for a private citizen. Yet, adding insult to injury, many of these criminal code sections then incorporate by reference the administrative regulations (and their sanctions and penalties) of various regulatory agencies. The ABA does not even know how many such regulations exist, but it approximates them to over 10,000. The sheer number of these laws is stupendous and still keeps growing. Even Congress' own research service cannot count the current number of Federal crimes. And if they cannot keep track of them, how could you or I?
All these numbers speak to a different concern: We find that there is no single place where an American can go to learn what is a federal crime. The laws are scattered pell-mell throughout the code.
Three Felonies a Day?
November 19,2020 Scott see. Tips.
"Show me the man and I'll find you the crime. " Lavrentiy Beria, Stalin's Soviet Security Chief.
It is no State secret that government legislators and bureaucrats churn out a multitude of laws, statutes, codes, rules, and regulations year after year without any letup. After all, they must justify their existence, and one way to do that is to make new laws, rules, and regulations for us to follow. It also solidifies their power over their fellow citizens.
Almost two millennia ago, the Roman historian Tacitus observed that "the more corrupt the State, the more numerous the laws. " he was on to something. In the United States, the growth industry is not really in Congressional laws, which actually show a mild downward trend at times, but is in the bureaucratic rules and regulations and guidance documents that they generate. The old and outdated rules and regulations rarely go away, while the new ones keep piling up. How can anyone, even a lawyer, keep up with all of the mandates?
The Result?
Some 20 years ago, the American Bar Association (ABA) reported that we have more than 3,300 separate criminal offenses. And 40% of these criminal offenses were created in just the previous three decades. Now, that estimate has increased to 4,500 Federal crimes in the United States Code, and more than 300,000 Federal crimes in some 400,000+ Federal rules and regulations!
Just look through some 50 separate Titles of the United States Code, add those offenses together, and you will come up with at least 27,000 pages of crimes. That would be enough to be any attorney's nightmare, let alone for a private citizen. Yet, adding insult to injury, many of these criminal code sections then incorporate by reference the administrative regulations (and their sanctions and penalties) of various regulatory agencies. The ABA does not even know how many such regulations exist, but it approximates them to over 10,000. The sheer number of these laws is stupendous and still keeps growing. Even Congress' own research service cannot count the current number of Federal crimes. And if they cannot keep track of them, how could you or I?
And if you cannot keep track of the laws, how will you know when they have been violated? For instance, assessing criminal penalties for harming the environment may sound like a great idea, but not when they result in an injustice. In 1994, the White Pass & Yukon Railroad hired a contracting company to blast and carry away rock outcroppings. In doing its work, one employee of the contractor was using a backhoe to clear some rock debris from the tracks and accidentally struck an oil pipeline running alongside the railroad tracks. The pipeline burst open and spilled many thousands of gallons of oil into the adjacent creek. Theoff-dutymanager of the Railroad (not the worker, nor the manager of the independent contractor) was later convicted and sentenced to six months in prison, a relatively lucky sentence considering the other criminal charges he faced for conduct that happened while he was not even working and by someone who was not even his employee!
Are We Being Over Criminalized?
In his 2011 book Three Felonies A Day How the Feds Target the Innocent, Boston civil-rights lawyer Harvey Silverglate reasoned that the average American commits several felonies each day without even realizing it. Worse still, he notes that if the government takes a dislike to you for any reason, then they can and will easily dig up a felony that you are guilty of.
That is the thing that unites all you Democratic douches, your complete fucking arrogance.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2922931]The FEC did not fine Trump, and they find Hiliary for 2016. Enough said. You are engaged in an idiotic battle of semantics. [/QUOTE]All that proves is that the Democratic FEC commissioners are more fair minded and willing to find fault. BTW Hillary's campaign was fined a miniscule amount and the DNC a much larger amount. And you know why? Because the DNC classified the expenditures for the Steele dossier as: . Wait for it. Legal expenses instead of Opposition Research.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2922931] But on to more important things, aren't you late for one of your Covid boosters? You still wearing a mask? Have you ventured out your Motel 6 in the last year? I remember you bragging about the towels there. Are they still all warm and fluffy? I think I can speak for all the guys here and say we were really jealous of you and your towels.[/QUOTE]So kind of you to be concerned. Yes I am up to date on my vaccinations. Are you? I remember you were quick to get those CoVid vaccination shots when they were first made available. Now, in a fit of hypocrisy that can only define a partisan hack. You attack the vaccinations and claim they are completely ineffectual and dangerous. Just one question Elvis, does your neck hurt when you talk out of both sides of your face?
As to the hotel in Medellin. I haven't lived there for close to 2 years now.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2922935]The average American breaks three laws a day.
[URL]https://www.wholefoodsmagazine.com/articles/3161-three-felonies-a-day[/URL]
Just look through some 50 separate Titles of the United States Code, add those offenses together, and you will come up with at least 27,000 pages of crimes. That would be enough to be any attorney's nightmare, let alone for a private citizen. Yet, adding insult to injury, many of these criminal code sections then incorporate by reference the administrative regulations (and their sanctions and penalties) of various regulatory agencies. The ABA does not even know how many such regulations exist, but it approximates them to over 10,000. The sheer number of these laws is stupendous and still keeps growing. Even Congress' own research service cannot count the current number of Federal crimes. And if they cannot keep track of them, how could you or I?
All these numbers speak to a different concern: We find that there is no single place where an American can go to learn what is a federal crime. The laws are scattered pell-mell throughout the code.
Three Felonies a Day?
November 19,2020 Scott see. Tips.
"Show me the man and I'll find you the crime. " Lavrentiy Beria, Stalin's Soviet Security Chief.
It is no State secret that government legislators and bureaucrats churn out a multitude of laws, statutes, codes, rules, and regulations year after year without any letup. After all, they must justify their existence, and one way to do that is to make new laws, rules, and regulations for us to follow. It also solidifies their power over their fellow citizens.
Almost two millennia ago, the Roman historian Tacitus observed that "the more corrupt the State, the more numerous the laws. " he was on to something. In the United States, the growth industry is not really in Congressional laws, which actually show a mild downward trend at times, but is in the bureaucratic rules and regulations and guidance documents that they generate. The old and outdated rules and regulations rarely go away, while the new ones keep piling up. How can anyone, even a lawyer, keep up with all of the mandates?
The Result?
Some 20 years ago, the American Bar Association (ABA) reported that we have more than 3,300 separate criminal offenses. And 40% of these criminal offenses were created in just the previous three decades. Now, that estimate has increased to 4,500 Federal crimes in the United States Code, and more than 300,000 Federal crimes in some 400,000+ Federal rules and regulations!
Just look through some 50 separate Titles of the United States Code, add those offenses together, and you will come up with at least 27,000 pages of crimes. That would be enough to be any attorney's nightmare, let alone for a private citizen. Yet, adding insult to injury, many of these criminal code sections then incorporate by reference the administrative regulations (and their sanctions and penalties) of various regulatory agencies. The ABA does not even know how many such regulations exist, but it approximates them to over 10,000. The sheer number of these laws is stupendous and still keeps growing. Even Congress' own research service cannot count the current number of Federal crimes. And if they cannot keep track of them, how could you or I?
And if you cannot keep track of the laws, how will you know when they have been violated? For instance, assessing criminal penalties for harming the environment may sound like a great idea, but not when they result in an injustice. In 1994, the White Pass & Yukon Railroad hired a contracting company to blast and carry away rock outcroppings. In doing its work, one employee of the contractor was using a backhoe to clear some rock debris from the tracks and accidentally struck an oil pipeline running alongside the railroad tracks. The pipeline burst open and spilled many thousands of gallons of oil into the adjacent creek. Theoff-dutymanager of the Railroad (not the worker, nor the manager of the independent contractor) was later convicted and sentenced to six months in prison, a relatively lucky sentence considering the other criminal charges he faced for conduct that happened while he was not even working and by someone who was not even his employee!
Are We Being Over Criminalized?
In his 2011 book Three Felonies A Day How the Feds Target the Innocent, Boston civil-rights lawyer Harvey Silverglate reasoned that the average American commits several felonies each day without even realizing it. Worse still, he notes that if the government takes a dislike to you for any reason, then they can and will easily dig up a felony that you are guilty of.
That is the thing that unites all you Democratic douches, your complete fucking arrogance.[/QUOTE]You've written some good posts recently Elvis. My main point of disagreement is that most board members posting in this thread are not douches, but rather people who've been sadly and unduly influenced by Democratic Party propaganda.
Your post above is my favorite. I read Silverglate's book and two others like them. Hunter Biden should never have been convicted of felony charges for weapons violations. Neither should Trump have been for paying off a porn star and cooperating with the National Enquirer to kill the Paula McDougal and false love child stories. The most egregious may have been the $455 million that Trump was fined by the state of New York for violating New York Executive Law 63 (12). There's no doubt he violated the law, which enables prosecutors to charge any New York business or businessman with fraud. But the magnitude of the fine was ridiculous given the banks knew Trump was lying on his statements of financial condition and loaned him money anyway. And Trump never defaulted on the terms of the loans in question. He made all the principal and interest payments and the banks made money. Finally, none of the money will go to the banks that allegedly were defrauded. Rather all of it will go into the coffers of the State of New York. And that's one of the main reasons for the existence of New York Executive Law 63 (12), to enable the state to grab assets from businesses and businessmen.
The one silver lining in this is perhaps it will start to make the political class realize how fucked up our justice system is. Maybe that's starting to seep in on Trump. In fact, maybe Hunter would have fared better under a Trump Department of Justice than he is now. From the New York Times:
[I](Trump) sometimes leads with empathy about the plight of addiction and his own family experience with it, including in a recent interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News.
“I had a brother who suffered tremendously from alcoholism and alcohol,” Mr. Trump told Mr. Hannity of his older brother, Fred Trump Jr., whose fight with addiction Mr. Trump often credits for why he himself does not drink. “And it was a terrible thing to watch. He was an incredible guy with the best personality. He was the best-looking person you have ever seen. Everything was perfect. But he had an addiction. And so I understand addiction.”
In other interviews this year, he has used questions about Hunter Biden to suggest his empathy with those struggling with addiction and to lament the destructive effects of fentanyl flowing across the border.
These days, Mr. Trump rarely mentions Hunter Biden on the stump. Instead, he tends to refer broadly to Mr. Biden and his family as corrupt.[/I]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/11/us/politics/donald-trump-hunter-biden.html?searchResultPosition=12[/URL]
As Silverglate has written, this issue is much bigger than just Biden and Trump. And for that matter it's even bigger than what Silverglate writes about. How many young, black American men are in jail who shouldn't be? How many people have been executed who never should have been? We historically have had the highest or close to the highest incarceration rate in the world. The prosecutors are out of control.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2922798]First, the Winger-owned Wall Street Jounal concocted a "report" about Joe Biden supposedly "slipping" mentally at a meeting that, no surprise, was comprised of known Repub liars' opinion and no truth-telling Dem opinion. Including one well-documented Repub former Squeaker of the House who was known to have made a similar public statement that he totally contradicted in private:
[B]The Wall Street Journals story about Bidens mental acuity suffers from glaring problems.
June 6, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/06/media/wall-street-journal-biden-mental-acuity/index.html[/URL]
Then, the Sinclair Winger Broadcast Group of local news outlets are caught repeating the Winger-owned WST bullshit "report" on their local outlets, which polls show viewers believe to be "more trustworthy" than the national outlets, apparently all reading from the exact same Winger script:
[B]Watch: Local Sinclair Anchors Read Same Shady Script on Bidens Age.
Local news anchors across the country are reading from the exact same script on Joe Biden.
June 11, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://newrepublic.com/post/182567/sinclair-right-wing-script-biden-age-local-news[/URL]
And now we have this report in a couple of national news outlets:
[B]CEOs at Trump meeting say he was 'meandering,' 'doesn't know what he's talking about'.
June 14, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/14/ceos-at-trump-meeting-not-impressed.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
So this is when the modest test of Sinclair Winger Broadcast Group begins. Do I even have to spell out what that "more trustworthy" local news test is? LOL.[/QUOTE]I never knew the Sinclair Broadcast Group existed before reading about it on this forum. It's interesting to know that it's part of a vast right wing conspiracy to brainwash Americans in the heartland. Since I know little about it, I can't comment.
However, I do read the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. And have in the past subscribed to the Washington Post. The WSJ is the only one of the group that has objective news reporting about American politics. It broke the Stormy Daniels and National Enquirer / Paula McDougal stories. There's a good chance America never would have known about these alleged instances of election interference if not for the WSJ.
The CNN piece is a misrepresentation of the WSJ article, which was extremely well researched. Yes, the WSJ piece does paint a sad picture of the President's mental acuity, because the man is slipping. But it bent over backwards to be fair to Biden. For example:
[I]Former President Donald Trump, who at 77 is 3 years younger than Biden, also has faced questions about his mental acuity. Indeed, both candidates have been captured repeatedly on camera slipping up on facts or otherwise botching their public remarks, providing a steady stream of fodder for both Democrats and Republicans to attack the mental capacity of the opposing candidate.
During Bidens January meeting on Ukraine, the president laid out a forceful case for providing aid, according to administration officials and some participants, who added that using notes in such meetings is common practice. White House spokesman Bates denied that Biden had misspoken during his one-on-one exchange with Johnson in February about energy policy.
Administration aides familiar with last years debt-ceiling negotiations said Biden was effective, that his role was to be above the fray and to provide detailed instructions behind the scenes. They said McCarthy privately told administration officials at the time that he was impressed with Bidens performance, and that McCarthy suggested as much in public remarks.
They said the passage of both Ukraine funding and a debt-ceiling increase without major concessions to Republicans shows he succeeded.
Some who attended the meetings attributed off-key moments to his speech impediment and his tendency to be long-winded. Those who expressed concern about Biden said the behavior they saw suggested an unevenness, not the caricature of an addled leader that some of his political opponents draw. The White House said the presidents doctors have found him fit to serve, and that his recent annual physical showed no need for a cognitive test.
Members of the Biden administration offered numerous examples of other situations that they said showed the president was sharp and engaged, including long hours in the Situation Room in April during and after Irans missile attack on Israel, and late nights on the phone with lawmakers from his White House residence.[/I]
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/joe-biden-age-election-2024-8ee15246?mod=Searchresults_pos4&page=1[/URL]
We don't often get to see Biden unscripted, like Robert Hur, Merrick Garland's hand-picked special prosecutor in the classified documents case. Hur and others who have, including some of the sources in the WSJ article, don't paint a pretty picture.
Fair and balanced doesn't mean fair and balanced to just your side.
-
Uh-huh
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923035]I never knew the Sinclair Broadcast Group existed before reading about it on this forum. It's interesting to know that it's part of a vast right wing conspiracy to brainwash Americans in the heartland. Since I know little about it, I can't comment.
However, I do read the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. And have in the past subscribed to the Washington Post. The WSJ is the only one of the group that has objective news reporting about American politics. It broke the Stormy Daniels and National Enquirer / Paula McDougal stories. There's a good chance America never would have known about these alleged instances of election interference if not for the WSJ.
The CNN piece is a misrepresentation of the WSJ article, which was extremely well researched. Yes, the WSJ piece does paint a sad picture of the President's mental acuity, because the man is slipping. But it bent over backwards to be fair to Biden. For example:
[I]Former President Donald Trump, who at 77 is 3 years younger than Biden, also has faced questions about his mental acuity. Indeed, both candidates have been captured repeatedly on camera slipping up on facts or otherwise botching their public remarks, providing a steady stream of fodder for both Democrats and Republicans to attack the mental capacity of the opposing candidate.
During Bidens January meeting on Ukraine, the president laid out a forceful case for providing aid, according to administration officials and some participants, who added that using notes in such meetings is common practice. White House spokesman Bates denied that Biden had misspoken during his one-on-one exchange with Johnson in February about energy policy.
Administration aides familiar with last years debt-ceiling negotiations said Biden was effective, that his role was to be above the fray and to provide detailed instructions behind the scenes. They said McCarthy privately told administration officials at the time that he was impressed with Bidens performance, and that McCarthy suggested as much in public remarks.
They said the passage of both Ukraine funding and a debt-ceiling increase without major concessions to Republicans shows he succeeded.
Some who attended the meetings attributed off-key moments to his speech impediment and his tendency to be long-winded. Those who expressed concern about Biden said the behavior they saw suggested an unevenness, not the caricature of an addled leader that some of his political opponents draw. The White House said the presidents doctors have found him fit to serve, and that his recent annual physical showed no need for a cognitive test.
Members of the Biden administration offered numerous examples of other situations that they said showed the president was sharp and engaged, including long hours in the Situation Room in April during and after Irans missile attack on Israel, and late nights on the phone with lawmakers from his White House residence.[/I]
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/joe-biden-age-election-2024-8ee15246?mod=Searchresults_pos4&page=1[/URL]
We don't often get to see Biden unscripted, like Robert Hur, Merrick Garland's hand-picked special prosecutor in the classified documents case. Hur and others who have, including some of the sources in the WSJ article, don't paint a pretty picture.
Fair and balanced doesn't mean fair and balanced to just your side.[/QUOTE]So the Winger Murdoch-owned WSJ "report" with the headline:
[B]Behind Closed Doors, Biden Shows Signs of Slipping.
Participants in meetings said the 81-year-old president performed poorly at times. The White House said Biden is sharp and his critics are playing partisan politics.[/B]
Is obviously fair and balanced according to you because somewhere in the "report" they threw in some "Bothsider" pabulum about Trump too.
Great.
When the WSJ features a headline like that about Donald covfefe, WWII is coming, I nearly escaped death, that photo of my sexual assault victim is of my wife, a failed teleprompter always means it's Sharknado Week, CEOs he addressed say he meandered and didn't know what he was talking about (a claim never made about Biden) Trump and then Sinclair Winger Broadcast Group's local news outlet anchors repeat the most election-damaging phrases from it in parrot-like mimicry around the country sometime between now and November 5, please post the links for it here.
Thank you.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2922798]First, the Winger-owned Wall Street Jounal concocted a "report" about Joe Biden supposedly "slipping" mentally at a meeting that, no surprise, was comprised of known Repub liars' opinion and no truth-telling Dem opinion. Including one well-documented Repub former Squeaker of the House who was known to have made a similar public statement that he totally contradicted in private:
[B]The Wall Street Journals story about Bidens mental acuity suffers from glaring problems.
June 6, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/06/media/wall-street-journal-biden-mental-acuity/index.html[/URL]
Then, the Sinclair Winger Broadcast Group of local news outlets are caught repeating the Winger-owned WST bullshit "report" on their local outlets, which polls show viewers believe to be "more trustworthy" than the national outlets, apparently all reading from the exact same Winger script:
[B]Watch: Local Sinclair Anchors Read Same Shady Script on Bidens Age.
Local news anchors across the country are reading from the exact same script on Joe Biden.
June 11, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://newrepublic.com/post/182567/sinclair-right-wing-script-biden-age-local-news[/URL]
And now we have this report in a couple of national news outlets:
[B]CEOs at Trump meeting say he was 'meandering,' 'doesn't know what he's talking about'.
June 14, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/14/ceos-at-trump-meeting-not-impressed.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
So this is when the modest test of Sinclair Winger Broadcast Group begins. Do I even have to spell out what that "more trustworthy" local news test is? LOL.[/QUOTE]It's really funny how some people are willing to throw stones from the comfort of their glass houses. One would presume they should be very, very quiet due to glaring Trump's own mental issues, but alas.
From another thread:
[B]Biden Is Getting Older. Trump Is Losing His Mind.[/B]
[URL]https://www.thebulwark.com/p/biden-getting-older-trump-losing-mind[/URL]
[B]Trump, Dementia, Collective Pathology[/B]
[URL]https://kenmcgoogan.com/2024/05/17/trump-dementia-collective-pathology[/URL]
This is that damning petition McGoogan is talking about, and it's currently signed by nearly 2,500 licensed mental health professionals (3 weeks ago it was signed by 1,900 people).
[QUOTE]We, the undersigned licensed medical and mental health professionals concur: From our years of training and experience, we are convinced that, while a definitive diagnosis would require further testing, Donald Trump is showing unmistakable signs strongly suggesting dementia, based on his public behavior and informant reports that show progressive deterioration in memory, thinking, ability to use language, behavior, and both gross and fine motor skills.[/QUOTE][B]Our Diagnostic Impression of Trump is Probable Dementia: For Licensed Professionals Only[/B]
[URL]https://www.change.org/p/our-diagnostic-impression-of-trump-is-probable-dementia-for-licensed-professionals-only[/URL]
-
Only fools suffer the law...Ignorantia juris non excusat!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2922935]Do you work on being this stupid? The average American breaks three laws a day.
[URL]https://www.wholefoodsmagazine.com/articles/3161-three-felonies-a-day[/URL]
Just look through some 50 separate Titles of the United States Code, add those offenses together, and you will come up with at least 27,000 pages of crimes. That would be enough to be any attorney's nightmare, let alone for a private citizen. ...
Three Felonies a Day?
...
Some 20 years ago, the American Bar Association (ABA) reported that we have more than 3,300 separate criminal offenses. And 40% of these criminal offenses were created in just the previous three decades. Now, that estimate has increased to 4,500 Federal crimes in the United States Code, and more than 300,000 Federal crimes in some 400,000+ Federal rules and regulations!
...
Are We Being Over Criminalized? [/QUOTE]That was a nice comedic, Moscow Marjorie, rant on crime. I find your "outrage" on crime and The Rule of Law, just childish rubbish. Thus very disingenuous and unauthentic.
[u]Ignorantia juris non excusat:[/u]
Yes, by all means post and quote the all the stats, numbers and pages and pages of criminal documentation, laws and rules that are in the US and are shockingly and suddenly, relevant to Repub's rants on crime. But in case you have figured it out yet, this is the very reason (unfortunately), why lawyers exist. [B]Ignorantia juris non excusat![/B] (Ignorance of the Law is No Defense!)
Isn't it always funny how, you Trump apologists and multi-millionaire, billionaire and white-collar apologists, love to get up on your high horse and turn a blind eye to white collar crime, while simultaneously love to rant, bloviate and pound the table, religiously when it comes to blue collar crime. [b]Almost as if to say, white collar crime should get a pass![/b]
What you Moscow Marjories and Russia's most "useful idiots", fail to realize, is that much of the criminal code written (over time) or in the past several decades, was written by "white-collar" lawmakers, primarily for "blue-collar" workers, or put into law by upper-class citizens to keep lower-class citizens in check. It's only when these same criminal laws and statutes are now being applied to them, that we see an outcry to abandon, "The Rule of Law", "the DOJ and criminal justice system are corrupt/unfair" or an outcry to "defund the FBI" ...etc.
The fact is, White-collar crime has EXPLODED! You see it among the elites and billionaires around the world. You see it with high ranking officials, like with several of our SCOTUS justices. We've seen it with an unhinged ex-president in Trump, who led a violent QAnon/MAGA mob, in a seditious and treasonous insurrection.
So when white-collar crime is being defending by their apologists, it often comes with the ill-conceived foolish notion that white-collar crime is "victimless" crime and therefore [I][b]"no harm, no foul"[/b][/I] and no punishment should be applied.
But people like Trump, knew he was committing a crime, because he had the benefit of highly paid lawyers, telling him as much. OVER and OVER and OVER again! For decades, his lawyers have been advising him on what is and isn't criminal behavior w/r to the Law. And for decades he's operated in criminal behavior, UNCHECKED! Until now that is!
But much like one of my fav. fables, [i]"The Scorpion and the Frog"[/i],...Trump the serial liar and serial criminal, just can't help himself, [i][b]"...it's in his nature".[/b][/i]
And what is so evident from all of Trump's trials, is that Trump loves to hire corrupt, unethical and unscrupulous lawyers. So he can commit criminal behavior and then throw his gullible corrupt lawyers "under the bus", for his criminal acts. The US jails are littered with Trump's ex-lawyers.
But dear ol' Donald, always thinks he the "smartest cat" in the room. He's be been peddling in criminal behavior for decades, and his comeuppance may have finally arrived.
However, Americans now know and have come to realize that, Trump LISTENS TO KNOW ONE! ...WHY?
Because he, Trump, [B][u]thinks[/u] he's ABOVE THE LAW![/B] And I'm sure, many of you, Trump and billionaire apologists, think they are too!
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923031]You've written some good posts recently Elvis. My main point of disagreement is that most board members posting in this thread are not douches, but rather people who've been sadly and unduly influenced by Democratic Party propaganda.[/QUOTE]Good to hear from you Tiny. But first off, I have to disagree with you. If you are a monger and think of yourself and others here as "law abiding citizens" then you are an arrogant douche regardless of party affiliation. If you are promoting "rule of law" when mongering versus innocent until proven guilty or reasonable doubt, then you are a hypocrite. I think several here are under the delusion that government likes them while hating other mongers.
I made a Jewish-PLO analogy with the Trump case but there is a better one in the monger world. The two witnesses against you are a hooker who will say or do anything for a buck and her jailed pimp who will say or do anything to get out of jail. Literally anything those two said should constitute reasonable doubt. So it is crazy for a monger to being cheering on a conviction based on testimony from people like that. They both lied and were caught lying. The only way a monger can cheer on a victory like that is the arrogance that they will not be charged like that is a similar fashion, and that too is being a douche without regards to party affiliation. If your ego is in check, you should not be cheering this on but be petrified that the same could happen to you. You have to buy into the delusion of "rule of law" and the delusion that you are "law abiding" to be happy with it.
If you have read those books, you know that law is grey. Law comes not just from legislative bodies, but also from judges and from administrative bodies, and they often contradict one another. If I am on a jury then, I am not focused on "rule of law" but what is best for us as a society. Ironically, apparently, the jury was 6 to 6 which was probably broken down among party lines at first and within a day they were unanimous. If you go by "rule of law", Hunter Biden is guilty as fuck, and I think that is what the Democratic jurors were convinced of.
But you do not see Republicans jumping up and down about Hunter being convicted. You see this [URL]https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1800550481481146847:[/URL] Hunter Biden being convicted of a firearms charge is the ultimate red herring of red herrings. The DOJ allowed the statute of limitations expire on his most serious tax charges, buried evidence of the Bidens' foreign bribery allegations, and attempted to give Hunter a sweetheart deal with broad immunity. David Weiss wouldn't go after him on the serious tax charges or on FARA because all of that would lead back to the shady business dealings involving his father. Instead, they went after him for a much lesser charge, where the evidence was way too insurmountable to ignore, so they can scream "nobody is above the law" when they put President Trump in jail.
Why are we so upset about foreign governments, when the worst election manipulators are in our own government? I would much prefer the Democratic douches stop prosecuting Republicans out of this bullshit that was let slide before like FARA and contempt of Congress, but if you are going to use this rule of law bullshit, we will too.
Thing is with "rule of law", it seems like the law preventing Hunter from owning a gun violates the 2nd amendment, but this case arguably the best Hunter had to defend himself with, was stripped away by the judge. So the while Hunter matter was not "rule of law" but choosing to go after which law he broke and tossing the laws that contradict with the case you are bringing.
To strike away the 2nd amendment with Hunter shows how much power judges have, and a lot of them are fucking nuts. To say the judges in any of these NY cases were not compromised is a joke. The thing is in the two civil cases the judges got away with their BS.
In this case, the guilty verdict was not well received. What would have destroyed any other pol did not damage Trump at all, and there is evidence it helped him. Like with Hunter and the 2nd amendment, the judge had to make preliminary rulings that removed contradictory laws to move the case forward. That is Trump's wrong doing was a misdemeanor and the statue of limitations is 2 years. If you follow "rule of law" and custom then, the Trump case is never brought because the statue of limitations lapsed.
But have you noticed Tiny no one is referring to Trump as a "convicted felon" much. This is when I get into conspiracy mode. If you are a Democratic douche engaging in herd think as they all do, the comment that was left on the Supreme Court's Facebook page does not matter. It was just some idiot poster. It was actually put up and then deleted after the fact, but it really was huge. The fact that the Supreme Court brought that to the judge's attention and the judge sent out a letter means the case will probably be a mistrial.
At the federal level, any instance of juror misconduct will result in a mistrial and the government has to prove the jury was not tainted. With NY courts, they can do a little more investigating but not much more. If the NY court system wanted this jury decision to stand, then they would have ignored the comment.
But jury misconduct like so many other laws is sporadically enforced. Hell, the whole jury on the OJ case had their bags packed up before the case went into deliberations. Before the jury even convened, they knew their fellow jurors were voting not guilty.
Honestly, I thought we had already been through this shit. We got around prostitution laws by paying for time and giving gifts versus paying directly for sex. Then the government changed it such that prostitution and human trafficking were synonymous and they started arresting boat loads of mongers. The laws passed by Congress were minor in comparison to how LE interpreted human trafficking.
You look at the definition of human trafficking and within the definition is using money to coerce women into having sex with you. I have to wonder how many douches look at that and think that definition does not apply to them.
-
Let's try to Bothsider that. LOL
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2923057]It's really funny how some people are willing to throw stones from the comfort of their glass houses. One would presume they should be very, very quiet due to glaring Trump's own mental issues, but alas.
From another thread:
[B]Biden Is Getting Older. Trump Is Losing His Mind.[/B]
[URL]https://www.thebulwark.com/p/biden-getting-older-trump-losing-mind[/URL]
[B]Trump, Dementia, Collective Pathology[/B]
[URL]https://kenmcgoogan.com/2024/05/17/trump-dementia-collective-pathology[/URL]
This is that damning petition McGoogan is talking about, and it's currently signed by nearly 2,500 licensed mental health professionals (3 weeks ago it was signed by 1,900 people).
[B]Our Diagnostic Impression of Trump is Probable Dementia: For Licensed Professionals Only[/B]
[URL]https://www.change.org/p/our-diagnostic-impression-of-trump-is-probable-dementia-for-licensed-professionals-only[/URL][/QUOTE]That is a thoroughly credible, unbiased, professional assessment of the alarming things we have been seeing and hearing from the unscripted and, well, even heavily scripted and telepromptered Donald Trump over the past 9+ years.
That is why his being banned from Facebook and Xitter in the past as well as the recent unavoidable criminal trial gag orders were all only helpful to his poll numbers and, in 2016, to his theft of that election. Typically pro Repub Mainstream Media were only helping Trump steal that election by not televising every minute and every word of every one of his rallies from the very beginning and they knew it.
By sharp contrast, the only thing the Trump Cult members can come up with as "evidence" of Joe Biden's non existant dementia are AI replications and tightly edited videos of him momentarily stepping away from the group at the G7 meeting to give a thumbs up and say something complimentary to the men in uniform.
And, no, proposing, fighting for and passing legislation and programs that led The World to and became the Crown Jewel of recovery from the historic, unprecedented death and economic destruction of Trump's Pandemic is not a "sign" of dementia.
Everybody knows that is all the Trump Cult members have got, all they can do. Which is why Merrick Garland is right not to give them the audio recording of Biden's interview with Hur. If they want to make up shit about Biden's mental acuity they will have to work harder with some AI tools rather than just tightly edit, twist and mangle the audio of his actual voice.
And, guaranteed, what Biden said when he walked over to those paratroopers was unscripted, no teleprompter, perfectly appropriate to the moment and pertinent to what the paratroopers had just done and nothing about being bitten by electrified sharks.
-
Another good post Elvis. A couple of comments.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2923084]Good to hear from you Tiny. But first off, I have to disagree with you. If you are a monger and think of yourself and others here as "law abiding citizens" then you are an arrogant douche regardless of party affiliation. If you are promoting "rule of law" when mongering versus innocent until proven guilty or reasonable doubt, then you are a hypocrite. I think several here are under the delusion that government likes them while hating other mongers... If your ego is in check, you should not be cheering this on but be petrified that the same could happen to you. You have to buy into the delusion of "rule of law" and the delusion that you are "law abiding" to be happy with it.[/QUOTE]Absolutely. The easiest analogies with respect to the topics at hand are E. Jean Carroll's 88 million award for an unproven sexual assault that occurred almost 30 years ago. And the 34 felony convictions for trying to cover up his sexual assignations with Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal. There but for the grace of God go I. In the state where we live, seeing a prostitute is now a state jail felony.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2923084]If you have read those books, you know that law is grey. Law comes not just from legislative bodies, but also from judges and from administrative bodies, and they often contradict one another. If I am on a jury then, I am not focused on "rule of law" but what is best for us as a society. [/QUOTE]Yeah, that's what you and I would focus on as civil libertarians, but that's not the way the justice system works. The second we admit that we're unwilling to enforce stupid laws relevant to a case, we'd be struck from the jury. You're left with a group of 12 people who are going to follow the Almighty Law, regardless of what it says.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2923084] The DOJ allowed the statute of limitations expire on his most serious tax charges, buried evidence of the Bidens' foreign bribery allegations, and attempted to give Hunter a sweetheart deal with broad immunity. David Weiss wouldn't go after him on the serious tax charges or on FARA because all of that would lead back to the shady business dealings involving his father. Instead, they went after him for a much lesser charge, where the evidence was way too insurmountable to ignore, so they can scream "nobody is above the law" when they put President Trump in jail.
Why are we so upset about foreign governments, when the worst election manipulators are in our own government? I would much prefer the Democratic douches stop prosecuting Republicans out of this bullshit that was let slide before like FARA and contempt of Congress, but if you are going to use this rule of law bullshit, we will too.[/QUOTE]I agree and disagree. Yes, the reason Weiss was appointed was because the DOJ was caught proposing a sweetheart deal on tax charges. Yes, the DOJ allowed the statute of limitations to expire. However, I don't think Joe himself was bribed, although he did play along with Hunter's extraction of payments from foreign individuals and companies looking to whitewash crimes and bad behavior. Burisma is a great example. Was the Ukrainian government going after Mykola Zlochevsky (owner of Burisma), who transferred valuable oil and gas permits to his own company when he was Minister of Natural Resources? Well, as long as the son of the Vice President of the United States was on his board, hell no.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2923084] To strike away the 2nd amendment with Hunter shows how much power judges have, and a lot of them are fucking nuts. To say the judges in any of these NY cases were not compromised is a joke. The thing is in the two civil cases the judges got away with their BS.[/QUOTE]Engoron was nuts. The $455 million was beyond the pale, and New York Appeals courts struck down several of his rulings and lowered the amount of the bond required for appeal. Merchan was not nuts, but I believe he was biased. He gave the jury three ways to magically convert misdemeanor charges into felonies. I'm not familiar with the comment on the Supreme Court's facebook page.
Probably unlike you, I believe there are grounds to find Trump guilty in the Washington D.C. and Fulton County, Georgia cases. The New York cases on the other hand were plain stupid. Leticia James and Alvin Bragg made campaign promises to prosecute Trump and they kept them. Eighty seven percent of Manhattan voters went for Biden in 2020. Trump didn't have a chance.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923043]So the Winger Murdoch-owned WSJ "report" with the headline:
[B]Behind Closed Doors, Biden Shows Signs of Slipping.
Participants in meetings said the 81-year-old president performed poorly at times. The White House said Biden is sharp and his critics are playing partisan politics.[/B]
Is obviously fair and balanced according to you because somewhere in the "report" they threw in some "Bothsider" pabulum about Trump too.
....When the WSJ features a headline like that about Donald covfefe, WWII is coming, I nearly escaped death, that photo of my sexual assault victim is of my wife, a failed teleprompter always means it's Sharknado Week, CEOs he addressed say he meandered and didn't know what he was talking about (a claim never made about Biden) Trump and then Sinclair Winger Broadcast Group's local news outlet anchors repeat the most election-damaging phrases from it in parrot-like mimicry around the country sometime between now and November 5, please post the links for it here.[/QUOTE]You lost me there, everything after covfefe except the shark incident. The article in question wasn't biased. Wall Street Journal news reporting is not biased. The Wall Street Journal editorial pages on the other hand are often very biased. I agree with them more often than not.
-
You know nothing of those facts? Really?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923129]You lost me there, everything after covfefe except the shark incident. The article in question wasn't biased. Wall Street Journal news reporting is not biased. The Wall Street Journal editorial pages on the other hand are often very biased. I agree with them more often than not.[/QUOTE]You don't know anything about Trump blathering about how WWII is coming any minute now as a big dramatic closer for one of his fund raising events?
Nothing about him grandly announcing in writing that he "nearly escaped death", which means he is dead now BTW, in another of his fund raising efforts because he was 1,100 miles away from where the duly and routinely armed FBI agents searched his home / hotel in Mar-a-Lardo as was fully prearranged by all parties?
Nothing about him repeatedly misidentifying a photo of his sexual assault victim in the Carroll case as a photo of his wife, Marla?
Nothing about the corporate CEOs at a demonstrably GOP-friendly business meeting with Trump commenting that he meandered through it, seemed not to know what he was talking about?
Really?
Then I rest my case that Winger-owned media outlets like The Wall Street Journal at the national level and Sinclair Winger Broadcast Group at the local level have tried very hard and succeeded in keeping their patrons in a pro Trump, anti Biden media bubble.
-
Trump obviously knows and hires all the wrong people
So sad that many, many of the people Trump knows and hires to represent him, work with him in his time as an expert at bankrupting companies, losing millions if not billions of other people's money, producing his well deserved and well earned bi-partisan historian rating as The Worst President Ever and so on eventually turn on him or fail miserably to overcome his apparently insurmountable drive to produce utter catastrophe and turn everything he touches into shit right before it dies.
He really should have hired Elvis and Tiny to defend him in these recent civil and criminal trials.
Sure, he still would have lost 80+ Million in at least that one civil trial, the penalty of which was not about him sexually assaulting her. That was only $5 Million of it. No, it was about him not being able to keep his dementia rattled pie hole closed about it and refrain from continually tormenting and defaming her about it.
And sure, he still would have been convicted of all 34 of those Felonies because it was proven conclusively by all of the written documentation, written description of the crime by one of Trump's conspirators and all the sworn under oath testimony that the Hush Money payments, which were not the crimes he was charged with, and the criminally false business recording of them were fully and exclusively done in order to commit Election Fraud, a big criminal no-no in New York State, and to steal the 2016 Election, a further big criminal no-no in New York State.
But Elvis' and Tinys' repeated misrepresentation of what the actual civil awards, indictments and crimes were about are not what would have made them better choices than the attorneys Trump hired and who are no doubt destined to be stiffed on their fees and / or disbarred for whatever additional crime Trump lured them into along the way.
No, it is because it would have been fun to witness them struggling to make it all seem falsely equivalent to engaging in legal P4 P in Thailand or just a long ago misunderstanding about what unwanted and uninvited pussy grabbing and penetration really is in practice or some such nonsense. LOL.
-
Like the majority of Americans, I believe Biden is more senile than Trump. And Trump is nuttier than Biden. You don't have to choose between them though. You just need to come to the realization that, even if you live in a battleground state, your vote won't count. One vote won't make a difference.
I'll be voting for Libertarian Chase Oliver. He's 37 years old and "armed and gay. " What's not to like about that? Oliver is the best general election candidate since Gary Johnson in 2016.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2923057]It's really funny how some people are willing to throw stones from the comfort of their glass houses. One would presume they should be very, very quiet due to glaring Trump's own mental issues, but alas.
From another thread:
[B]Biden Is Getting Older. Trump Is Losing His Mind.[/B]
[URL]https://www.thebulwark.com/p/biden-getting-older-trump-losing-mind[/URL]
[B]Trump, Dementia, Collective Pathology[/B]
[URL]https://kenmcgoogan.com/2024/05/17/trump-dementia-collective-pathology[/URL]
This is that damning petition McGoogan is talking about, and it's currently signed by nearly 2,500 licensed mental health professionals (3 weeks ago it was signed by 1,900 people).
[B]Our Diagnostic Impression of Trump is Probable Dementia: For Licensed Professionals Only[/B]
[URL]https://www.change.org/p/our-diagnostic-impression-of-trump-is-probable-dementia-for-licensed-professionals-only[/URL][/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923139]You don't know anything about Trump blathering about how WWII is coming any minute now as a big dramatic closer for one of his fund raising events?
Nothing about him grandly announcing in writing that he "nearly escaped death", which means he is dead now BTW, in another of his fund raising efforts because he was 1,100 miles away from where the duly and routinely armed FBI agents searched his home / hotel in Mar-a-Lardo as was fully prearranged by all parties?
Nothing about him repeatedly misidentifying a photo of his sexual assault victim in the Carroll case as a photo of his wife, Marla?
Nothing about the corporate CEOs at a demonstrably GOP-friendly business meeting with Trump commenting that he meandered through it, seemed not to know what he was talking about?
Really?
Then I rest my case that Winger-owned media outlets like The Wall Street Journal at the national level and Sinclair Winger Broadcast Group at the local level have tried very hard and succeeded in keeping their patrons in a pro Trump, anti Biden media bubble.[/QUOTE]When you break your paragraphs up into sentences and put more thought into what you're writing, like you did in this post, you make more sense.
-
Trump was more interested in cheating a golf vs running the country...
[QUOTE= CheckMate1;2922789]Listened to Scaramucci on rick wilson on youtube about how it may be different than how things are portrayed with polls and media.[/QUOTE]
Thanks for the heads-up! Although I was expecting more talk on polls, beyond just the 30 sec in first and last 3-mins, of the video.
[QUOTE= CheckMate1;2922789] I thought their insight was very interesting. One of them said that in 2016, people didn't want to say they were voting for Trump out of fear of being alienated by their family / friends. Now in 2024, pretty much all the people who are going to vote for Trump, within the Republican party, are very much outspoken. And those who do not plan to vote for him, are in a state of silence out of fear of MAGA. I believe this to be true as well.
So I think he will have fewer votes than he did in 2020, and possibly even less than 2016. Time will tell. That's why I tell everyone to vote, don't care who they vote for. Just do it.
Pollsters and media like to have a close match. Ratings / revenues are better for it. They have a reason to keep things close. [/QUOTE]
Good to see, they are just as concerned about the Repub zealots and fanatics, surrounding Project 2025. And nothing good say about spinless Kevin McCarthy. I mean nothing! (....kkkk!)
What did come as a bit of a surprise was when Scaramucci says [i][b]"...Trump didn't think he was gonna win. Trump did not expect to win...". [/i][/b] He goes on to say that, "...on election night (Nov 8th, 2016) at 6pm, Trump says tomorrow he's looking forward to moving his plane to JFK from from LaGuardia (in order to fly out internationally), to play golf in Scotland at his new golf course."
That's how much Trump was looking forward to running the country and defending the free world...golf! Which again goes to the notion, that Trump cares nothing for America and all the ceremonial flag hugging, he does, is all just a farce and pure theater, for the gullible QAnon/MAGA cult.
-
Closet Libs?
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2923127] [QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2923084]If you have read those books, you know that law is grey. Law comes not just from legislative bodies, but also from judges and from administrative bodies, and they often contradict one another. If I am on a jury then, [b]I am not focused on "rule of law" but what is best for us as a society. [/b][/QUOTE]
Yeah, that's what you and I would focus on as civil libertarians, but that's not the way the justice system works. The second we admit that we're unwilling to enforce stupid laws relevant to a case, we'd be struck from the jury. You're left with a group of 12 people who are going to follow the Almighty Law, regardless of what it says.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, right! Dare I say you guys sound like a bunch of bleeding liberals (....kkkk!) Isn't it funny, how so many of you die-hard "law and order" Repubs, turn into libs, the moment the law rules against you.
What ever happen to the adjudicating the trial/case, based on the facts and evidence, presented before you, as a juror?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2923084]...I am not focused on "rule of law" [b]but what is best for us as a society.[/b][/QUOTE] (...kkkk!) As if you would know! (...kkkk!) Pure hubris! (...kkkk!)
-
Of course, that is just one huge advantage to taking over from a Dem POTUS
[QUOTE=Spidy;2923256]Thanks for the heads-up! Although I was expecting more talk on polls, beyond just the 30 sec in first and last 3-mins, of the video.
Good to see, they are just as concerned about the Repub zealots and fanatics, surrounding Project 2025. And nothing good say about spinless Kevin McCarthy. I mean nothing! (....kkkk!)
What did come as a bit of a surprise was when Scaramucci says [i][b]"...Trump didn't think he was gonna win. Trump did not expect to win...". [/i][/b] He goes on to say that, "...on election night (Nov 8th, 2016) at 6pm, Trump says tomorrow he's looking forward to moving his plane to JFK from from LaGuardia (in order to fly out internationally), to play golf in Scotland at his new golf course."
That's how much Trump was looking forward to running the country and defending the free world...golf! Which again goes to the notion, that Trump cares nothing for America and all the ceremonial flag hugging, he does, is all just a farce and pure theater, for the gullible QAnon/MAGA cult.[/QUOTE]That is the immutable pattern throughout the past 100 years.
Every incoming Repub taking over from an outgoing Dem has had exactly the same level of ease and luxury as Trump had after election day to either do absolutely nothing but plan a Gala Inauguration Ball, choosing the color scheme, table center piece decorations, entertainment and what not or start marking their calenders for the next 4 years of golfing, pony riding, golfing and sleeping, clearing brush down at the ranch, golfing, golfing, sleeping, sleeping and golfing.
Because the State of the Union at the end of any Dem presidential term is that stable and with all important factors on an improving trajectory and there is damn little the incoming Repub really needs to do in much of a hurry. Don't Worry, Be Happy.
And that, of course, comes at the end of a take no prisoners MSM-aided Repub Campaign of fake descriptions of American Carnage, skyrocketing crime rates, caravans of disease-ridden mutants invading our borders, abject poverty everywhere, empty shelves at grocery stores, no food, no water, life in America has never been worse. LOL.
But first, a few months of golfing and ridin' ponies. Lolol.
Contrast that with the horrific conditions incoming Dems have faced almost without exception at the end result of virtually every outgoing Repub presidency. Good lord. MSM and the American people are snapping at their heels, demanding they do something to fix this unprecedented, colossal Once in 100 Years Economic and / or National Security Disaster! And they want if fixed TODAY or there will be heads on sticks TOMORROW! LOL.
And no incoming Dems taking over from outgoing Repubs in the midst the typical horrific Repub presidential results had as great a challenge to repair those unprecedented Repub Disasters yet met that challenge and exceeded all reasonable expectations for recovery as did FDR, Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
And that is an inarguable historical fact.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2923271]Yeah, right! Dare I say you guys sound like a bunch of bleeding liberals (....kkkk!) Isn't it funny, how so many of you die-hard "law and order" Repubs, turn into libs, the moment the law rules against you.
What ever happen to the adjudicating the trial/case, based on the facts and evidence, presented before you, as a juror?
(...kkkk!) As if you would know! (...kkkk!) Pure hubris! (...kkkk!)[/QUOTE]I'll wear that badge with honor. I'm a social liberal and an economic liberal. You're not a liberal. You're a partisan Democrat.
Please see my post below:
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923031]As Silverglate has written, this issue is much bigger than just Biden and Trump. And for that matter it's even bigger than what Silverglate writes about. How many young, black American men are in jail who shouldn't be? How many people have been executed who never should have been? We historically have had the highest or close to the highest incarceration rate in the world. The prosecutors are out of control.[/QUOTE]And please point to where I said Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton or any other Democrat should be jailed. If I were dictator, fewer Democrats would be in jail. I wouldn't even lock up Menendez, unless he violated probation.
Would you lock up Trump for the Stormy Daniels/Karen McDougal charges?
Sincerely,
Bleeding Heart Liberal Tiny.
-
Uh. No.
There is no "Joe Biden counterpart" to this. None.
[B]Let's Talk About Trump's Gibberish.
What the former president's shark tirade says about American politics and media.
By Tom Nichols
June 12,2024.[/B]
[URL]https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/06/trump-sharks-las-vegas-rally-speech/678667/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=the-atlantic&utm_content=edit-promo[/URL]
[QUOTE]Perhaps the greatest trick Donald Trump ever pulled was convincing millions of people and the American media to treat his lapses into fantasies and gibberish as a normal, meaningful form of oratory. But Trump is not a normal person, and his speeches are not normal political events.
For too long, Trump has gotten away with pretending that his emotional issues are just part of some offbeat New York charm or an expression of his enthusiasm for public performance. But Trump is obviously unfit and something is profoundly wrong with a political environment in which he can now say almost anything, no matter how weird, and his comments will get a couple of days of coverage and then a shrug, as if to say: Another day, another Trump rant about sharks.
Wait, what?
Yes, sharks. In Las Vegas on Sunday, Trump went off-script. I have to assume that no competent speechwriter would have drafted this and riffed on the important question of how to electrocute a shark while one attacks. He had been talking, he claims, to someone about electric boats: "I say, 'What would happen if the boat sank from its weight and you're in the boat, and you have this tremendously powerful battery, and the battery's now underwater, and there's a shark that's approximately 10 yards over there?
As usual, Trump noted how much he impressed his interlocutor with his very smart hypothetical: "And he said, 'Nobody ever asks this question,' and it must be because of MIT, my relationship to MIT. Very smart. " (MIT? Trump's uncle taught there and retired over a half century ago, when Trump was in his 20's, and died in 1985. Trump often implies that his uncle passed on MIT's brainpower by genetic osmosis or something.).
This ramble went on for a bit longer, until Trump made it clear that given his choice, he'the rather be zapped instead of eaten: "But you know what I'the do if there was a shark or you get electrocuted? I'll take electrocution every single time. I'm not getting near the shark. So we're going to end that, we're going to end it for boats, we're going to end it for trucks. ".
Hopefully, this puts to rest any pressing questions among Americans about the presumptive Republican nominee's feelings on electric vehicles and their relationship to at least two gruesome ways to die.
Sure, it seems funnyHaha! Uncle Don is telling that crazy shark story again! Until we remember that this man wants to return to a position where he would hold America's secrets, be responsible for the execution of our laws, and preside as the commander in chief of the most powerful military in the world. A moment that seems like oddball humor should, in fact, terrify any American voter, because this behavior in anyone else would be an instant disqualification for any political office, let alone the presidency. (Actually, a delusional, rambling felon known to have owned weapons would likely fail a security check for even a visit to the Oval Office.).
Nor was the Vegas monologue the first time: Trump for years has fallen off one verbal cliff after another, with barely a ripple in the national consciousness. I am not a psychiatrist, and I am not diagnosing Trump with anything. I am, however, a man who has lived on this Earth for more than 60 years, and I know someone who has serious emotional problems when I see them played out in front of me, over and over. The 45th president is a disturbed person. He cannot be trusted with any position of responsibilityand especially not with a nuclear arsenal of more than 1,500 weapons. One wrong move could lead to global incineration.
Why hasn't there been more sustained and serious attention paid to Trump's emotional state?
First, Trump's target audience is used to him. Watch the silence that descends over the crowds at such moments; when Trump wanders off into the recesses of his own mind, they chit-chat or check their phones or look around, waiting for him to come back and offer them an applause line. For them, it's all just part of the show.
Second, Trump's staff tries to put just enough policy fiber into Trump's nutty verbal souffls that they can always sell a talking point later, as if his off-ramps from reality are merely tiny bumps in otherwise sensible speeches. Trump himself occasionally seems surprised when these policy nuggets pop up in a speech; when reading the teleprompter, he sometimes adds comments such as "so true, so true," perhaps because he's encountering someone else's words for the first time and agreeing with them. Thus, they will later claim that questions about sharks or long-dead uncles are just bad-faith distractions from substance. (These are the same Republicans who claim that every verbal stumble from Joe Biden indicates full-blown dementia.).
Third, and perhaps most concerning in terms of public discussion, many people in the media have fallen under the spell of the Jedi hand-waves from Trump and his people that none of this is as disturbing and weird as it sounds. The refs have been worked: A significant segment of the media and even the Democratic Party has bought into a Republican narrative that asking whether Trump is mentally unstable is somehow biased and elitist, the kind of thing that could only occur to Beltway mandarins who don't understand how the candidate talks to normal people.
Such objections are mendacious nonsense and represent a massive double standard. As Eugene Robinson of The Washington Post wrote today: "It is irresponsible to obsess over President Biden's tendency to mangle a couple of words in a speech while Donald Trump is out there sounding detached from reality. " Biden's mush-mouthed moments fall well within the range of normal gaffes. Had he or any other American politician said anything even remotely like one of Trump's bizarre digressions, we would be flooded with front-page stories about it. Pundits would be solemnly calling for a Much Needed National Conversation about the Twenty-Fifth Amendment.
It is long past time for anyone who isn't in the Trump base to admit, and to keep talking about, something that has been obvious for years: Donald Trump is unstable. Some of these problems were evident when he first ran, and we now know from revelations by many of his former staff that his problems processing information and staying tethered to reality are not part of some hammy act.
Worse, the people who once managed Trump's cognitive and emotional issues are gone, never to return. A second Trump White House will be staffed with the bottom of the barrel the opportunists and hangers-on willing to work for a reprehensible man. His Oval Office will be empty of responsible and experienced public servants if the day comes when someone has to explain to him why war might be about to erupt on the Korean peninsula or why the Russian or Chinese nuclear forces have gone on alert, and he starts talking about frying sharks with boat batteries.
The 45th president is deeply unwell. It is long past time for Americans, including those in public life, to recognize his inability to serve as the 47th.[/QUOTE]
-
No one is above the law!
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2923274]I'll wear that badge with honor. I'm a social liberal and an economic liberal. ...
...
Sincerely,
Bleeding Heart Liberal Tiny.[/QUOTE]
I'm sure you do, Tiny 12, wear it with honor, but does Elvis 2008?
BTW, [b]congratulations on coming out of the closet![/b] I'd like to see you keep that same energy on a number of other social liberal issues.
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2923274]You're not a liberal. You're a partisan Democrat. [/QUOTE]
So now you're telling me what I am? That's mighty big of you!
So tell me, does you're [b]"all knowing"[/b] god complex, care to tell me, [b]what Elvis 2008 is?[/b] Or any other ISGer is, for that matter?
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2923274]
Please see my post below:
And please point to where I said Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton or any other Democrat should be jailed. [b]If I were dictator[/b], fewer Democrats would be in jail. I wouldn't even lock up Menendez, unless he violated probation. [/QUOTE] (...kkkk) For decades, the Repub's mantra and whole philosophy has been to advocate and position itself as the party of "law and order". But it's plainly obvious, this philosophy only applies when "the law" (or LE), is not against them.
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2923274]Would you lock up Trump for the Stormy Daniels/Karen McDougal charges? [/QUOTE] Trump was convicted, based on the facts and evidence presented, was he not?
Personally, it's good to see The Rule of Law, has held up to its billing and not some kind of twisted Republican version, of what they think the law should be, or to whom is should ONLY apply.
A Rule of Law, that holds true to itself, is one where everyone is accountable and NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!
If you guys really believe the shit you're shoveling, then get out and fight for a change and more equality, in unjust laws, a criminal justice system and police brutality!
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923227]Like the majority of Americans, I believe Biden is more senile than Trump. And Trump is nuttier than Biden. You don't have to choose between them though. You just need to come to the realization that, even if you live in a battleground state, your vote won't count. One vote won't make a difference.
I'll be voting for Libertarian Chase Oliver. He's 37 years old and "armed and gay. " What's not to like about that? Oliver is the best general election candidate since Gary Johnson in 2016.[/QUOTE]After a cursory search I didn't find any evidence that "the majority of Americans" believes "Biden is more senile than Trump" while "Trump is nuttier than Biden. " By the way, that's a cute choice of words because senility always means a mental condition, while "nuttiness" can mean a variety of things including some positive character traits.
The problem with your assessment is that thousands of mental health professionals seem to strongly disagree with you.
As for the second part of your post, it leaves me baffled. Why even bother voting for Oliver when according to your own logic, your vote won't count. Like won't count at all because his chance of becoming president is precisely zero?
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923127]However, I don't think Joe himself was bribed[/QUOTE]There was no definitive proof but that is what an investigation would have been for. Anyway, an investigation into that is never going to happen.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923127]Probably unlike you, I believe there are grounds to find Trump guilty in the Washington D.C. and Fulton County, Georgia cases. The New York cases on the other hand were plain stupid. Leticia James and Alvin Bragg made campaign promises to prosecute Trump and they kept them. Eighty seven percent of Manhattan voters went for Biden in 2020. Trump didn't have a chance.[/QUOTE]If Fani Willis would have put more time into getting Trump rather than flying all over the place with her paid escort, Trump would have had a second guilty verdict. With that judge, that prosecutor, and a Fulton County jury, Trump had a better chance of being found innocent in Manhattan.
Tiny, I do not know if you saw the Republican party hearing on the SOS Brad Raffensperger. To the Dems here, it was a show just to blast him because Trump did not win, but the reality is there were all kind of voting irregularities in Georgia. The person heading the committee stopped the woman listing the offenses after three or four and said, "we get the idea". It was sooo bad. Of all the areas that were rigged / questionable, Georgia was the worst, and everyone knows it. So was Trump guilty? IMO No. Would have he been found guilty? Hell yes.
With the federal case, if you apply the "rule of law", Trump is totally guilty. The problem is how do you apply the law to Trump and not Pence, not HRC, not Biden and not Obama. The notion that the FBI was totally and 100% down with this SWAT team rolling into Mar-a-lago is pure BS.
Bloomberg did a FOIA and this is what they found: [URL]https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-03-15/trump-documents-raid-at-mar-a-lago-sparked-protest-from-fbi-employees[/URL].
"Did this really just happen? Am I dreaming? The FBI served a Search Warrant on a former president?" wrote an incredulous bureau employee in an email that was sent to the FBI's acting ombudsman, Chauncenette Morey, shortly after the Mar-a-Lago search. "If he took documents, give him a call and ask for them back. Like. Seriously? My own agency. A bunch of democrat political hacks up top. I've lost just about all faith in our leadership. Obviously they forgot Crossfire Hurricane. ".
Another wrote, "What is the predication of the warrant? It better be more than putting a few documents in the archives or classified material the man could have easily declassified.
The documents mention one threat that received widespread media attention: a Navy veteran armed with an AR-15 who said on social media days after the Mar-a-Lago search that federal agents should be killed "on sight. " he died in a shootout with a state trooper in Ohio after he tried to breach the FBI's Cincinnati field office.
And the response? The director sent a really nice letter but all it really said was "trust us".
End of link.
So yeah, Trump broke the law, but it is a law that is treated with grace when you are a former president, and you have the issue with Jack Smith not being a government employee being appointed as special prosecutor, mishandling of documents, a warrant that was not limited in scope, and sending in FBI agents in plan clothes to a place where the SS is duty bound to protect and the FBI authorized to use deadly force. We are lucky there was not a shootout and for what? Whatever is in those documents, Trump has infinitely more government secrets in his head. And trust us after all this? Bleech!
If there was a jury, they would not be shown the documents. It will be just trust us there were vital secrets within these documents and even though Trump is guilty, I would find some way to inject reasonable doubt because this is such banana republic shit, but it is not going to come to that. There have been multiple motions to dismiss the case and after the election, the judge will force the prosecution into a settlement which will probably be a fine in order to save face.
-
He is essentially voting for Trump
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2923302]After a cursory search I didn't find any evidence that "the majority of Americans" believes "Biden is more senile than Trump" while "Trump is nuttier than Biden. " By the way, that's a cute choice of words because senility always means a mental condition, while "nuttiness" can mean a variety of things including some positive character traits.
The problem with your assessment is that thousands of mental health professionals seem to strongly disagree with you.
[B]As for the second part of your post, it leaves me baffled. Why even bother voting for Oliver when according to your own logic, your vote won't count. Like won't count at all because his chance of becoming president is precisely zero?[/b][/QUOTE]Unless Tiny lives in a definite No Toss Up blue or red state, his Third Party, No Party or Write-in vote will essentially be for Trump, as he well knows. Under that same scenario, if he chooses not to vote at all he will essentially be voting for Trump. And he knows that very well, too.
Yeah, yeah, some argument can be made that such a vote might actually help Biden more than Trump. But not likely. Not by most Battleground State calculations at least.
In Winger World, nobody votes for a Third Party, No Party, a Write-in or chooses not to vote at all if they honestly believe there is even a 1 in 1000 chance their doing so will result in a Dem winning. And most definitely not if it means Biden winning over Trump. That is not happening in Winger World.
-
Well, we already know Trump's Close The Border plan would skyrocket inflation
As part of our ongoing series to answer the question, "Are Americans Too Dumb To Understand The Economy"?
This just in:
[B]How immigrants are helping keep job growth hot while inflation cools.
June 17, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/17/immigrants-help-economy-job-growth-inflation.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Immigration has helped the U.S. job market sustain a fiery run in recent months without reigniting inflation, economists and analysts say.
The U.S. economy added a whopping 272,000 jobs in May, but the consumer price index was unchanged.
This dynamic a hot job market and cooling inflation is in part the result of increased inflows of immigrants.
Recent spikes in immigration at the southern border and elsewhere in the U.S. have helped to keep the labor pool full even as job gains kept apace.
........
Immigration both authorized and unauthorized has helped the U.S. job market sustain a fiery run in recent months without reigniting inflation, economists and analysts say. The effect has been a favorable, though uncertain, situation for President Joe Biden ahead of the November election.[/QUOTE]Also, it's too bad the dumbest Americans regarding the economy, Trump voters in Red states, caused inflation to go so high and stay higher longer than it would have if only they had not "expected" inflation to do that.
If Red State / Trumpsters had not done that, this research study endorsed even by the Winger-ownd WSJ concluded that inflation would have topped out at a mere 5% and today would be 1. 7%.
[B]Trump Voters Dont Just Expect Higher InflationThey Get It Too.
There has always been a difference between how Republicans and Democrats view the economy. But the gap has gotten bigger.
May 25, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/inflation-differs-republican-democrat-states-data-14800c1e[/URL]
[QUOTE]Republicans right now think inflation is a much bigger problem than Democrats do, and a lot of that is just politics. But heres another possibility: Many of the places Republicans live indeed have had significantly higher inflation than Democratic enclaves.
In new research, economists Carola Binder, Rupal Kamdar and Jane Ryngaert examined Labor Department inflation figures for U.S. metropolitan areas, and compared them with voting data. Their finding: Metro areas with more Republicans and independent voters tended to have higher inflation in 2022 than places where Democrats...[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923543]As part of our ongoing series to answer the question, "Are Americans Too Dumb To Understand The Economy"?
This just in:
[B]How immigrants are helping keep job growth hot while inflation cools.
June 17, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/17/immigrants-help-economy-job-growth-inflation.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL][/QUOTE]Right you are Tooms. Sending 10 million illegals back to Latin America when unemployment is sub 4% is insane. I favor moving illegals into a guest worker program that would not confer citizenship. And expanding legal immigration of the best and the brightest.
Many Democrats favor conferring citizenship on immigrants who didn't enter through normal channels, because they believe the immigrants will vote for Democrats. They may be mistaken. A large number of the people coming now are refugees from Cuba and Venezuela. They've seen first hand how big, overbearing government works, and they don't like it.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923543]Also, it's too bad the dumbest Americans regarding the economy, Trump voters in Red states, caused inflation to go so high and stay higher longer than it would have if only they had not "expected" inflation to do that.
If Red State / Trumpsters had not done that, this research study endorsed even by the Winger-ownd WSJ concluded that inflation would have topped out at a mere 5% and today would be 1. 7%.
[B]Trump Voters Dont Just Expect Higher InflationThey Get It Too.
There has always been a difference between how Republicans and Democrats view the economy. But the gap has gotten bigger.
May 25, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/inflation-differs-republican-democrat-states-data-14800c1e[/URL][/QUOTE]I prefer this explanation from your article.
[I]Moodys Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi reckons that part of what drove inflation higher in Republican-leaning states was housingespecially with so many people moving South after the pandemic started.
You saw significant out-migration from the Northeast and the West Coast to the South and the Mountain West that tend to be more Republican, he said. Rents, in particular, shot higher, and rents and rent-derived measures count for about a third of the spending basket the Labor Department uses to calculate inflation.[/I]
People left blue states, looking for better opportunities in red states. Demand for goods, services and housing went up in red states, while it stagnated in blue states. That's a recipe for higher inflation in red states. Now there's nothing wrong with that. People who prefer higher taxes, greater equality at the expense of lower prosperity, more government services, and net zero carbon emissions should congregate in blue states and cities. And leave the rest of us alone.
And as to inflationary expectations, it sounds like the Republican man on the street was right. The Fed and the Biden Administration thought inflation was transient back around mid-year 2021. Well, they were wrong. The Republicans, Larry Summers and Jason Furman were right.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923595]Right you are Tooms. Sending 10 million illegals back to Latin America when unemployment is sub 4% is insane. I favor moving illegals into a guest worker program that would not confer citizenship. And expanding legal immigration of the best and the brightest.
Many Democrats favor conferring citizenship on immigrants who didn't enter through normal channels, because they believe the immigrants will vote for Democrats. They may be mistaken. A large number of the people coming now are refugees from Cuba and Venezuela. They've seen first hand how big, overbearing government works, and they don't like it.
I prefer this explanation from your article.
[I]Moodys Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi reckons that part of what drove inflation higher in Republican-leaning states was housingespecially with so many people moving South after the pandemic started.
You saw significant out-migration from the Northeast and the West Coast to the South and the Mountain West that tend to be more Republican, he said. Rents, in particular, shot higher, and rents and rent-derived measures count for about a third of the spending basket the Labor Department uses to calculate inflation.[/I].[/QUOTE]Nah, let's give Larry Summers and Jason Furman a dual MVP Award for Most Valuable Players in Terrorizing Repubs Into Wishing Higher and Longer Inflation Into Existence.
Thank God Biden and the Dems in Congress were not susceptible to that silly terrorism or we very likely would be suffering another Great Repub Global Depression to this day. Instead, Bidenomics totally averted so much as a global recession. And we only experienced a transitory spike in Trump Pandemic's inflation that peaked and fell as fast and sharply as it rose.
But we all would have seen a lower peak and a lower current rate today if only Summers, Furman, Trump and Fux News had not demanded the suckers believing their clearly inaccurate assessment and forecast of doom had not in turn terrorized their local grocery stores, gas stations, malls and landlords into raising prices sooner and higher than necessary in order to get ahead of the huge looming inflation catastrophe they invented in their minds.
-
I hear Cubans and Venezualans hate these results, but
Now, why can't Trump or any other Repub do this rather than produce all the Great Depressions, Great Recessions and Massive Jobs Destruction of the past 100 years?
And after outgoing Dem presidents hand them much, much better economic conditions than any outgoing Repub ever handed an incoming Dem.
Is it because they just don't want to? I'm beginning to think that is the only possible reason. I mean, damn, not even in 100 years!
[B]Record-Breaking Accomplishments On Jobs And Unemployment Under Biden.
June 7, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/richardmcgahey/2024/06/07/record-breaking-accomplishments-on-jobs-and-unemployment-under-biden/[/URL]
[QUOTE]The May jobs and unemployment report is out today, and it shows a continuing strong economy. The Biden Administrations robust and durable track record on jobs and unemployment is breaking records, putting up some of the best results weve seen in half a century.
.........
Bidens economic track record is particularly strong when you consider that many economists were expecting a recession by now. Former Treasury Secretary [b]Larry Summers[/b] spoke for many economists in 2022, saying a recession was almost inevitable, while in 2023 [b]Summers[/b] predicted a meaningful and significant slowdown for the economy, again like many other forecasters.
...........
Economists like James K. Galbraith of the University of Texas argue that both growth and recession are driven in substantial part by [b]policy choices[/b], and [b]intelligent policy[/b] can help avoid downturns.
Bidens policies have focused not only on sustaining overall growth, but on finding ways to get growths benefits to lower-wage workers and economically troubled regions of the country. Based on todays jobs and employment numbers, so far, so good.[/QUOTE]
-
Civil Lawsuits
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923031]The most egregious may have been the $455 million that Trump was fined by the state of New York for violating New York Executive Law 63 (12). There's no doubt he violated the law, which enables prosecutors to charge any New York business or businessman with fraud. But the magnitude of the fine was ridiculous given the banks knew Trump was lying on his statements of financial condition and loaned him money anyway. And Trump never defaulted on the terms of the loans in question. He made all the principal and interest payments and the banks made money. Finally, none of the money will go to the banks that allegedly were defrauded. Rather all of it will go into the coffers of the State of New York. And that's one of the main reasons for the existence of New York Executive Law 63 (12), to enable the state to grab assets from businesses and businessmen.[/QUOTE]This is how civil lawsuits work. The injured party brings a lawsuit against the accused. If the injured party proves their case in court, they will be awarded damages. A secondary court hearing determines the amount of award. Both sides present their case as how much based on what the law allows, experts testimony on the losses, and punitive assessment to deter the loser of case, as well as diswaying future bad actors from conducting business in unlawful maner.
All this leads back to what I said the previous post. Bring your A game to court with evidence and win the case, instead of crying about it, or make excuses AFTER you lose.
The banks could have gone after DJT as well, if they feel they were injured directly. I think this aspect is what some people hold onto. "Oh, the banks didn't feel they were cheated. " If you take the amount of resources to sue DJT, with all the delay tactics used, it may not be a wise use of money especially when you have deliver quarterly earnings to your shareholders. These are financial decisions by the banks, nothing more.
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2923624]This is how civil lawsuits work. The injured party brings a lawsuit against the accused. If the injured party proves their case in court, they will be awarded damages. A secondary court hearing determines the amount of award. Both sides present their case as how much based on what the law allows, experts testimony on the losses, and punitive assessment to deter the loser of case, as well as diswaying future bad actors from conducting business in unlawful maner.
All this leads back to what I said the previous post. Bring your A game to court with evidence and win the case, instead of crying about it, or make excuses AFTER you lose.
The banks could have gone after DJT as well, if they feel they were injured directly. I think this aspect is what some people hold onto. "Oh, the banks didn't feel they were cheated. " If you take the amount of resources to sue DJT, with all the delay tactics used, it may not be a wise use of money especially when you have deliver quarterly earnings to your shareholders. These are financial decisions by the banks, nothing more.[/QUOTE]The injured party did not bring a lawsuit CheckMate. The state of New York did. And the state of New York will receive the award, not the banks.
What party was injured? The banks received interest and principal payments and Trump didn't otherwise default on the loans in question. The banks made money.
Fraud normally requires actual damage to a party to convict. Not New York Executive Law 63 (12) though.
Trump's case wasn't the most egregious brought under the statute. That honor may belong to Exxon. New York sued Exxon for purported damage to shareholders because it failed to disclose the risk to its business from carbon emissions. The fine though would have gone to the state of New York! In other words, Exxon shareholders, who own the company, were supposed to pay the state of New York for the fraud perpetrated on said shareholders by Exxon! It would be like Bernie Madoff's investors dipping into their pockets to pay the government for their money that Bernie lost, except that Exxon didn't defraud anyone. That judgement was overturned on appeal. I expect New York appeals courts will substantially reduce Trump's 455 million fine.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923432]Unless Tiny lives in a definite No Toss Up blue or red state, his Third Party, No Party or Write-in vote will essentially be for Trump, as he well knows. Under that same scenario, if he chooses not to vote at all he will essentially be voting for Trump. And he knows that very well, too.
Yeah, yeah, some argument can be made that such a vote might actually help Biden more than Trump. But not likely. Not by most Battleground State calculations at least.
In Winger World, nobody votes for a Third Party, No Party, a Write-in or chooses not to vote at all if they honestly believe there is even a 1 in 1000 chance their doing so will result in a Dem winning. And most definitely not if it means Biden winning over Trump. That is not happening in Winger World.[/QUOTE]Except for my homeowner's association, my single vote is EXTREMELY unlikely to decide an election. As such I will vote for Truth, Justice and the American Way. For the Libertarian. For Chase Oliver, "armed and gay. ".
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2923302]After a cursory search I didn't find any evidence that "the majority of Americans" believes "Biden is more senile than Trump" while "Trump is nuttier than Biden. " By the way, that's a cute choice of words because senility always means a mental condition, while "nuttiness" can mean a variety of things including some positive character traits.
The problem with your assessment is that thousands of mental health professionals seem to strongly disagree with you.
As for the second part of your post, it leaves me baffled. Why even bother voting for Oliver when according to your own logic, your vote won't count. Like won't count at all because his chance of becoming president is precisely zero?[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-biden-mental-cognitive-health-president-poll-analysis/[/URL]
A third of voters believe Biden has the cognitive ability to be president while half believe Trump does, from the above link.
It takes a special kind of nutty to try to steal an American presidential election, but you may be right. Taking into account his mental decline, Biden may be nuttier.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2923304]There was no definitive proof but that is what an investigation would have been for. Anyway, an investigation into that is never going to happen.
[/QUOTE]Elvis, your inbox is full.
Good post about confidential records. I haven't been able to reply because I can't get on the site with my pc, only with my phone, so am confining myself to short replies to our Democrat friends whose posts weren't as substantial as yours. Will be back in due course. That was a very interesting Bloomberg article.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923633]Elvis, your inbox is full.
Good post about confidential records. I haven't been able to reply because I can't get on the site with my pc, only with my phone, so am confining myself to short replies to our Democrat friends whose posts weren't as substantial as yours. Will be back in due course. That was a very interesting Bloomberg article.[/QUOTE]I cleaned up my inbox.
-
Trump would not suffer any meaningful loss either unless he is lying about his wealth
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923628]The injured party did not bring a lawsuit CheckMate. The state of New York did. And the state of New York will receive the award, not the banks.
What party was injured? The banks received interest and principal payments and Trump didn't otherwise default on the loans in question. The banks made money.
Fraud normally requires actual damage to a party to convict. Not New York Executive Law 63 (12) though.
Trump's case wasn't the most egregious brought under the statute. That honor may belong to Exxon. New York sued Exxon for purported damage to shareholders because it failed to disclose the risk to its business from carbon emissions. The fine though would have gone to the state of New York! In other words, Exxon shareholders, who own the company, were supposed to pay the state of New York for the fraud perpetrated on said shareholders by Exxon! It would be like Bernie Madoff's investors dipping into their pockets to pay the government for their money that Bernie lost, except that Exxon didn't defraud anyone. That judgement was overturned on appeal. I expect New York appeals courts will substantially reduce Trump's 455 million fine.[/QUOTE]As long as you are convinced that lying on loan documents that shift advantageous terms and money to frauds and liars rather than to honest borrowers is a "victimless crime" as long as the liars share their ill-gotten gains, if any, that they cheated the honest borrowers out of with the bank they originally stole it from, you should feel all warm and fuzzy knowing that a self-described multi multi multi Billionaire won't really suffer any meaningful penalty by paying a mere $455 Million fine for doing it.
No real "victim" on either side, right?
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923151]
He really should have hired Elvis and Tiny to defend him in these recent civil and criminal trials.
But Elvis' and Tinys' repeated misrepresentation of what the actual civil awards, indictments and crimes were about are not what would have made them better choices than the attorneys Trump hired and who are no doubt destined to be stiffed on their fees and / or disbarred for whatever additional crime Trump lured them into along the way.
No, it is because it would have been fun to witness them struggling to make it all seem falsely equivalent to engaging in legal P4 P in Thailand or just a long ago misunderstanding about what unwanted and uninvited pussy grabbing and penetration really is in practice or some such nonsense. LOL.[/QUOTE]Man, if you are a Democrat these days, you have to be arrogant as fuck. What did I say about the law? It is not black and white but gray and here you go again Tooms, When I said government could steal your assets as easily as happened with Trump, you made some arrogant comment why it could not happen to you. Now you come up with this complete bullshit that you only mongered in Thailand where it was legal.
First, there is the Mann Act which is still on the books. In its original form, the act made it a felony to engage in interstate or foreign commerce transport of "any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose". In addition to its stated purpose of preventing human trafficking, the law was used to prosecute unlawful premarital, extramarital, and interracial relationships.
The point is that the USA has the ability to prosecute you even if you are abroad. Congress passed a law stating it was illegal to have sex with a minor even in a foreign land relatively recently.
But you are not engaged in human trafficking right? Yeah, let's look at that definition again: the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, obtaining, patronizing, or soliciting of a person for the purpose of a commercial sex act, in which the commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such act has not attained 18 years of age.
Despite the fact that everyone here knows you are lying when you say you only have mongered in Thailand, it does not matter. If you show up in court as some senior with an 18 year old girl claiming to have had sex with you because you coerced her with money, you would be found guilty of trafficking before any depositions were even taken.
Has this happened? Not that I am aware of, but then again, the merging and twisting of laws to get Trump was a one time thing as well. When the libertarian part of the Republican party talks of law and order, we are talking about crimes where there is a victim. We cannot stand government prosecuting people for victimless crimes.
When you have prosecutors actively campaigning to get Trump, you toss the law out the window. The only way Democrats vote for that is the arrogance that they believe that same legal system will not come after them. You mongers lie and tell yourself you are not doing anything illegal while banging hookers. The arrogance and hypocrisy is astounding.
As Matt Taibbi said, Putin jailed his political opposition using the law as well. That is in the Russian tradition of "show me the man, and I will show you the crime". And yet you Democratic douches rant on and on about saving Democracy while you endorse swat teams raids, endless impeachments, and these bullshit lawfare tactics. Putting your political opposition in jail is the most undemocratic thing I can think of outside of assassination and given Biden is not providing SS protection for RFK Jr, he is free to be accused for wanting RFK Jr assassinated.
Tooms, you are not pro-Democracy. You are wanting one party rule like in China and Russia. You just are under the delusion that this party, your party will not come after you. Oh yeah, government would never seize my assets, would never prosecute me. If the government sees value in doing so, they will find a crime to charge you with. You are not innocent. You are just not worth their time and money.
-
1 photos
No surprise that MSM's consistent election mission works. To a point.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923631][URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/trump-biden-mental-cognitive-health-president-poll-analysis/[/URL]
A third of voters believe Biden has the cognitive ability to be president while half believe Trump does, from the above link.
It takes a special kind of nutty to try to steal an American presidential election, but you may be right. Taking into account his mental decline, Biden may be nuttier.[/QUOTE]That poll is quite a testament for the effectiveness of the 3 years long Mainstream Media-aided and abetted Repub BS about Biden not being able to string two words together, not knowing who he is, where he is, all those tightly edited video and audio fakes and so on.
Or maybe some of the Dem poll respondents and most of the Repub respondents simply don't know the meaning of the term "cognitive health. ".
After all, anyone with above average "cognitive health" and who at least knows what the term means could not possibly think it takes more of it to defy all expert advise not to lay the foundation for and spend a year exacerbating a historic deadly and economically disastrous pandemic.
Or to spend 2. 5+ Trillion on an economic "stimulus" bill that produced 1 million fewer jobs with it than without it.
Or to get busted for a blatantly obvious Election Fraud scheme to steal an election.
Or to bankrupt some half dozen or more businesses.
Or to repeatedly refer to his #1 Repub Party Primary opponent "Nikki Haley, Nikki Haley, Nikki Haley" as the Democratic Speaker of the House on January 6, 2021.
Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
Than the "cognitive health" as well as the sharp memory, recall and experience needed to brilliantly lead America and the rest of the world in a historic recovery from those Trump / Repub Disasters that has and continues to produce record positive results across the board.
Behold the Republican Party Presidential Candidate's 2024 Election Campaign Platform:
-
You are wrong again
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2923727]Man, if you are a Democrat these days, you have to be arrogant as fuck. What did I say about the law? It is not black and white but gray and here you go again Tooms, When I said government could steal your assets as easily as happened with Trump, you made some arrogant comment why it could not happen to you. Now you come up with this complete bullshit that you only mongered in Thailand where it was legal.
First, there is the Mann Act which is still on the books. In its original form, the act made it a felony to engage in interstate or foreign commerce transport of "any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose". In addition to its stated purpose of preventing human trafficking, the law was used to prosecute unlawful premarital, extramarital, and interracial relationships.
The point is that the USA has the ability to prosecute you even if you are abroad. Congress passed a law stating it was illegal to have sex with a minor even in a foreign land relatively recently.
But you are not engaged in human trafficking right? Yeah, let's look at that definition again: the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, obtaining, patronizing, or soliciting of a person for the purpose of a commercial sex act, in which the commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such act has not attained 18 years of age.
Despite the fact that everyone here knows you are lying when you say you only have mongered in Thailand, it does not matter. If you show up in court as some senior with an 18 year old girl claiming to have had sex with you because you coerced her with money, you would be found guilty of trafficking before any depositions were even taken.
Has this happened? Not that I am aware of, but then again, the merging and twisting of laws to get Trump was a one time thing as well. When the libertarian part of the Republican party talks of law and order, we are talking about crimes where there is a victim. We cannot stand government prosecuting people for victimless crimes..[/QUOTE]When did I ever say I have only mongered in Thailand?
The Mann Act does not apply to me or anything I have ever done in Thailand, in the USA or anywhere else in the world.
Oh, and I have done nothing that the USA could prosecute me for regarding sex for any purpose or with anyone I have had sex with in the 12 years I have lived in Thailand. You want them to violate the Statute of Limitations in order to bust me for mongering in other countries 12+ years ago? And it will probably be 20+ years if or when I ever return to the USA to deal with my California businesses.
Unlike Trump's crimes, the Statute of Limitations for any blow job or fuck I paid for such that the USA would consider it a crime did not get extended that much due to the hold put on the world during Trump's Pandemic. LOL.
Have you got a link to a USA Penal Code number that you think I have violated? Please post it.
-
The decision on The People V DJT says otherwise
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923628]The injured party did not bring a lawsuit CheckMate. The state of New York did. And the state of New York will receive the award, not the banks.
What party was injured? The banks received interest and principal payments and Trump didn't otherwise default on the loans in question. The banks made money.
Fraud normally requires actual damage to a party to convict. Not New York Executive Law 63 (12) though.
Trump's case wasn't the most egregious brought under the statute. That honor may belong to Exxon. New York sued Exxon for purported damage to shareholders because it failed to disclose the risk to its business from carbon emissions. The fine though would have gone to the state of New York! In other words, Exxon shareholders, who own the company, were supposed to pay the state of New York for the fraud perpetrated on said shareholders by Exxon! It would be like Bernie Madoff's investors dipping into their pockets to pay the government for their money that Bernie lost, except that Exxon didn't defraud anyone. That judgement was overturned on appeal. I expect New York appeals courts will substantially reduce Trump's 455 million fine.[/QUOTE]This is where I disagree with you. But one of us will be correct, after the appeals have been adjudicated. And I will say to you, now, if the decision is reversed (not the awarded amount), then I AM WRONG, and you are RIGHT.
-
Lol
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923629]Except for my homeowner's association, my single vote is EXTREMELY unlikely to decide an election. As such I will vote for Truth, Justice and the American Way. For the Libertarian. For Chase Oliver, "armed and gay. ".[/QUOTE]Oh, that is so brave and noble of you. Especially considering in modern times it is extremely unlikely that any election would be decided by one vote outside of an election for dog catcher in Hooterville.
And no presidential election has been decided by one vote.
But I'll bet if you thought this presidential election might be decided by 537 votes in your state as it was in 2000 in Florida, you sure as hell would not goof around with the possibility of missing out on "4 More Years of Great Trump / Repub Economic Disasters" by voting for Oliver or anyone else but Trump.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923868]Oh, that is so brave and noble of you. Especially considering in modern times it is extremely unlikely that any election would be decided by one vote outside of an election for dog catcher in Hooterville.
And no presidential election has been decided by one vote.
But I'll bet if you thought this presidential election might be decided by 537 votes in your state as it was in 2000 in Florida, you sure as hell would not goof around with the possibility of missing out on "4 More Years of Great Trump / Repub Economic Disasters" by voting for Oliver or anyone else but Trump.[/QUOTE]Actually if you put a gun to my head and told me I had to vote for Biden or Trump, I'd tell you to pull the trigger.
That's even though it's more likely Trump's policies would work to the benefit of many of my friends and family, who work in fossil fuels. Biden and the Democrats want to take their jobs. But they also want lower gasoline prices. What a hoot!
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2923867]This is where I disagree with you. But one of us will be correct, after the appeals have been adjudicated. And I will say to you, now, if the decision is reversed (not the awarded amount), then I AM WRONG, and you are RIGHT.[/QUOTE]I don't think Judge "Kangaroo" Engoron's decision should or will be reversed. Trump deserves to pay some fine for misrepresenting his statements of financial condition. But, taking a more extreme example, you don't execute people for jaywalking.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923860]When did I ever say I have only mongered in Thailand?
The Mann Act does not apply to me or anything I have ever done in Thailand, in the USA or anywhere else in the world.
Oh, and I have done nothing that the USA could prosecute me for regarding sex for any purpose or with anyone I have had sex with in the 12 years I have lived in Thailand. You want them to violate the Statute of Limitations in order to bust me for mongering in other countries 12+ years ago? And it will probably be 20+ years if or when I ever return to the USA to deal with my California businesses.
Unlike Trump's crimes, the Statute of Limitations for any blow job or fuck I paid for such that the USA would consider it a crime did not get extended that much due to the hold put on the world during Trump's Pandemic. LOL.
Have you got a link to a USA Penal Code number that you think I have violated? Please post it.[/QUOTE]Your personal situation is irrelevant to the principles described by Elvis. And it wouldn't be surprising at all if you were currently violating USA Laws right now, just like most Americans, although admittedly the DOJ or PRC (People's Republic of California) is extremely unlikely to try to extradite you. See Elvis' "three crimes a day" post.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923955]Your personal situation is irrelevant to the principles described by Elvis. And it wouldn't be surprising at all if you were currently violating USA Laws right now, just like most Americans, although admittedly the DOJ or PRC (People's Republic of California) is extremely unlikely to try to extradite you. See Elvis' "three crimes a day" post.[/QUOTE]My personal experience is precisely what Elvis posted about this and other times.
But on his broader point, nobody stole Trump's assets. But there are mountains of evidence that Trump and his daddy stole Americans' assets in their various tax evasion schemes, loan document lies and acts of fraud.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923774]
Or to spend 2. 5+ Trillion on an economic "stimulus" bill that produced 1 million fewer jobs with it than without it.[/QUOTE]Taking less from American businesses and hardworking Americans of all income levels is not the same as "spending" less. Furthermore, if memory serves me correctly, your source takes an estimate by the CBO from around 2017 or 2018, and assumes that the tax cuts will be extended past their sunset dates. Recent research published by the National Bureau of Economic Research and authored by economists from Princeton, Harvard and the University of Chicago indicates the corporate tax cuts over the long term will actually increase government revenues. That's mostly because of increases in revenues from social security and medicare contributions by individuals and companies.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923774]Or to get busted for a blatantly obvious Election Fraud scheme to steal an election.[/QUOTE]You got me there. Or would if I were a Trump fan.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923774]Or to bankrupt some half dozen or more businesses.[/QUOTE]Wow! That's amazing! Eighteen thousand nine hundred and twenty six (18,926) businesses filed for bankruptcy in 2023 under Biden. And Trump only bankrupted six during four years in office!
Oh, you mean six of HIS businesses! Agreed. But he viewed that as a plus and even campaigned on it. "Vote for me, I know how to rig the system."
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923774]Or to repeatedly refer to his #1 Repub Party Primary opponent "Nikki Haley, Nikki Haley, Nikki Haley" as the Democratic Speaker of the House on January 6, 2021.
Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
Than the "cognitive health" as well as the sharp memory, recall and experience needed to brilliantly lead America and the rest of the world in a historic recovery from those Trump / Repub Disasters that has and continues to produce record positive results across the board.
Behold the Republican Party Presidential Candidate's 2024 Election Campaign Platform:[/QUOTE]Your argument sounds a little like mine that Korea's Kim family wasn't as bad as Cambodia's Pol Pot regime because there were fewer democides under the Kim family.
Democide, that's an interesting word. I wonder if they picked that name for it because of all the people who died in wars presided over by Democratic Party presidents during the 20th century?
That's a joke Tooms -- there's no need to debunk my last statement.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2923727]Tooms, you are not pro-Democracy. You are wanting one party rule like in China and Russia. You just are under the delusion that this party, your party will not come after you. Oh yeah, government would never seize my assets, would never prosecute me. If the government sees value in doing so, they will find a crime to charge you with. You are not innocent. You are just not worth their time and money.[/QUOTE]Tooms isn't a bad guy. He just doesn't see the writing on the wall. He's hitched his wagon to the Democratic Party, and that's where it will stay, come hell or high water.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923953]Actually if you put a gun to my head and told me I had to vote for Biden or Trump, I'd tell you to pull the trigger.
That's even though it's more likely Trump's policies would work to the benefit of many of my friends and family, who work in fossil fuels. Biden and the Democrats want to take their jobs. But they also want lower gasoline prices. What a hoot![/QUOTE]Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction take your friends' and family's jobs, along with tens of millions other Americans. Like the most recent ones Repub Trump's policies and stewardship produced.
Not Great Dem Economic Recoveries, Great Dem Expansions and Historic Dem Jobs Creation, including these current ones under Joe Biden.
If your friends and family in the oil industry have done poorly under Joe Biden or worse than they and virtually every other American fared under Trump's results, then they really need to find another line of work anyway.
Great time to start looking for those new jobs would be right now or in the next 4 1/2 years under Biden. For God's sake don't tell them to wait for when Trump or some other Repub is in the WH. All consistent historical and current data shows that would be the worst time to start looking for a new job.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923722]As long as you are convinced that lying on loan documents that shift advantageous terms and money to frauds and liars rather than to honest borrowers is a "victimless crime" as long as the liars share their ill-gotten gains, if any, that they cheated the honest borrowers out of with the bank they originally stole it from, you should feel all warm and fuzzy knowing that a self-described multi multi multi Billionaire won't really suffer any meaningful penalty by paying a mere $455 Million fine for doing it.
No real "victim" on either side, right?[/QUOTE]Correct, as to the loans that were the subject of the Engoron judgement, there were no victims on either side. The loans never went into default. Trump met his interest and principal payment requirements.
Deutsche Bank accounted for most of the value of the loans, and it was assuming that Trump was worth about half of what he stated he was worth on his statements of financial condition. And based on estimates by Forbes and others, DB probably wasn't off by a lot. They were big boys and knew what they were getting into. Deutsche lost tens of millions on mostly unsecured loans on the Trump Tower Chicago, which mostly were not backed up by Trump's personal guarantee, back around 2011 I believe. They knew the score, and realized that Trump's personal guarantee on later loans was worth a lot.
Judge Engoron, in determining the amount owed by Trump to the state of New York, assumed the guarantee was worth absolutely nothing. In fact, the amounts of the fines represented the additional interest that Trump would have paid if the loans were unsecured (around 9% per annum) versus secured (around 4% or 5%.) That's ridiculous. With the secured loans, Deutsche Bank could go after all of Trump's assets, not just the building that secured the loan.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923959]Tooms isn't a bad guy. He just doesn't see the writing on the wall. He's hitched his wagon to the Democratic Party, and that's were it will stay, come hell or high water.[/QUOTE]Not at all IF AND ONLY IF Repubs start producing the occasional Great Economic Recovery, Economic Expansion and Historic Jobs Creation and None of the Great Depressions, Great Recessions and Massive Jobs Destruction.
As Dems have consistently done for the past 100 years.
I am only partisan to the side that produces superior results and against the side that produces crap results.
And factoring in all available data and easily observable reality over the past 100 years, my vote must go only to Dems and never to Repubs.
Another one of Elvis' total misrepresentations is in how he apparently believes the Checks and Balances principle of USA democracy and governance is about Party affiliation. Uh. No.
In today's world that would be like arguing we ought to place an equal amount of known arsonists / Repubs in my neighborhood as fire fighters and first responders / Dems. You know, just to be fair and keep the Checks and Balances feature going. LOL.
Not with my help.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2923301]BTW, [b]congratulations on coming out of the closet![/b] I'd like to see you keep that same energy on a number of other social liberal issues. [/QUOTE]Sure Spidy. I full support your right to change your sex, provided you're 21 years of age. And your right to use marijuana, provided you're 18 years of age. Also your right to pay for sex with a donkey, provided said donkey is at least 18 years of age and consenting. And finally, if you were a women, I would support your right to get an abortion, provided it's under 15 weeks from conception in accordance with the Trump Doctrine.
These are all hypotheticals. I believe you're a pretty normal, decent type who's not looking for donkey sex, etc., even though you are a partisan Democrat.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2923301]So now you're telling me what I am? That's mighty big of you! [/QUOTE]Happy to support you on your voyage of self discovery!
[QUOTE=Spidy;2923301] (...kkkk) For decades, the Repub's mantra and whole philosophy has been to advocate and position itself as the party of "law and order". But it's plainly obvious, this philosophy only applies when "the law" (or LE), is not against them.
Trump was convicted, based on the facts and evidence presented, was he not?
Personally, it's good to see The Rule of Law, has held up to its billing and not some kind of twisted Republican version, of what they think the law should be, or to whom is should ONLY apply.
A Rule of Law, that holds true to itself, is one where everyone is accountable and NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!
If you guys really believe the shit you're shoveling, then get out and fight for a change and more equality, in unjust laws, a criminal justice system and police brutality![/QUOTE]If there ever was a politically twisted version of how the Rule of Law has not held up to its billing, it's Trump's 34 felony convictions for paying off Stormy Daniels. And I have gotten out and fought. I was a contributor to and card carrying member of the ACLU before it became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923963]Correct, as to the loans that were the subject of the Engoron judgement, there were no victims on either side. The loans never went into default.
Deutsche Bank accounted for most of the value of the loans, and it was assuming that Trump was worth about half of what he stated he was worth on his statements of financial condition. And based on estimates by Forbes and others, DB probably wasn't off by a lot. They were big boys and knew what they were getting into. Deutsche lost tens of millions on mostly unsecured loans on the Trump Tower, which mostly were not backed up by Trump's personal guarantee, back around 2011 I believe. They knew the score, and realized that Trump's personal guarantee on later loans was worth a lot.
Judge Engoron, in determining the amount owed by Trump to the state of New York, assumed the guarantee was worth absolutely nothing. In fact, the amounts of the fines represented the additional interest that Trump would have paid if the loans were unsecured (around 9% per annum) versus secured (around 4% or 5%.) That's ridiculous. With the secured loans, Deutsche Bank could go after all of Trump's assets, not just the building that secured the loan.[/QUOTE]So as long as the frauds and liars who steal undeserved advantageous loan terms show enough of a profit from it to pay back the original fraudulently secured loan, then the banks, the law and everyone else who didn't lie and did not get those advantageous loan terms ought to be fine with that, right?
LOL.
You know, contrary to typical Repub lack of logic, if frauds and liars like Trump were really so terrific at producing profits and paying back loans, really owning $100 Million, 50,000 square foot, 2 bedroom, 2 bathroom condos and all that instead of being a blithering business failure, bankruptcy king and shameless deadbeat, he wouldn't have to lie on those loan documents to get favorable terms. He would deserve them and get them after having actually earned them.
Which is anathema to Repubs, of course.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923967]Sure Spidy. I full support your right to change your sex, provided you're 21 years of age. And your right to use marijuana, provided you're 18 years of age. Also your right to pay for sex with a donkey, provided said donkey is at least 18 years of age and consenting. And finally, if you were a women, I would support your right to get an abortion, provided it's under 15 weeks from conception in accordance with the Trump Doctrine.
These are all hypotheticals. I believe you're a pretty normal, decent type who's not looking for donkey sex, etc., even though you are a partisan Democrat.
Happy to support you on your voyage of self discovery!
If there ever was a politically twisted version of how the Rule of Law has not held up to its billing, it's Trump's 34 felony convictions for paying off Stormy Daniels. And I have gotten out and fought. I was a contributor to and card carrying member of the ACLU before it became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party.[/QUOTE]Trump was not convicted of paying off Stormy Daniels.
Why do you and other Trumpster / Repubs keep lying about that?
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923970]Trump was not convicted of paying off Stormy Daniels.
Why do you and other Trumpster / Repubs keep lying about that?[/QUOTE]OK, yeah, I gave you the condensed version. He was convicted for keeping false business records by channeling payments to Daniels through his attorney, and for failure to disclose that as a campaign contribution. He called it legal expense, but never deducted the expense from his taxable income. This was logical. Trump signs his own checks but he doesn't do the accounting, and undoubtedly he didn't want rumors floating around his organization (and getting back to Melania and his kids) about paying off a porn star. So he didn't just write a check to Stormy. And admittedly it wouldn't have helped his presidential campaign if this got out. But calling that an unreported campaign contribution? It's ridiculous.
He didn't cheat on his taxes. In fact, the federal and New York state governments ended up with more tax revenue than if he'd paid Stormy directly, being the additional tax paid by Michael Cohen on the transaction.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923975]OK, yeah, I gave you the condensed version. He was convicted for keeping false business records by channeling payments to Daniels through his attorney, and for failure to disclose that as a campaign contribution. He called it legal expense, but never deducted the expense from his taxable income. This was logical. Trump signs his own checks but he doesn't do the accounting, and undoubtedly he didn't want rumors floating around his organization (and getting back to Melania and his kids) about paying off a porn star. So he didn't just write a check to Stormy. And admittedly it wouldn't have helped his presidential campaign if this got out. But calling that an unreported campaign contribution? It's ridiculous.
He didn't cheat on his taxes. In fact, the federal and New York state governments ended up with more tax revenue than if he'd paid Stormy directly, being the additional tax paid by Michael Cohen on the transaction.[/QUOTE]You forgot the part where his fellow conspiritors and staffers, in written documents and testimony under oath, all evidence presented and verified showed that the sole purpose of the scheme was to "influence" (steal) the 2016 election and for no other reason. Doing it for that reason is an additional Felonious act.
That was the final nail in Trump's 34 Felony Convisctions even if he never had sex with Daniels and what raised his crime to a more serious felony.
And, no, the judge and the prosecutors did not just make up that part of in the closing arguments.
Trump's fixer Michael Cohen has been saying that was the sole reason for Trump's Election Fraud scheme for years. As he did again under oath at Trump's trial with zero contradicting evidence presented by anyone or with any document.
And, no, I am not personally at risk of the USA government or NY State or California State governments coming after me and convicting me of such a thing.
Or Hillary Clinton ever.
Or Joe Biden ever.
Or Barack Obama ever.
-
Why is it so ridiculous?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923975]OK, yeah, I gave you the condensed version. He was convicted for keeping false business records by channeling payments to Daniels through his attorney, and for failure to disclose that as a campaign contribution. He called it legal expense, but never deducted the expense from his taxable income. This was logical. Trump signs his own checks but he doesn't do the accounting, and undoubtedly he didn't want rumors floating around his organization (and getting back to Melania and his kids) about paying off a porn star. So he didn't just write a check to Stormy. And admittedly it wouldn't have helped his presidential campaign if this got out. But calling that an unreported campaign contribution? It's ridiculous. [/QUOTE]Ridiculous? He paid her to get elected.
Maybe he didn't really need it to get elected. Maybe he would've been elected even if Stormy had personally informed every one of his supporters about the event. In fact, his horrible Access Hollywood tape didn't seem to hurt him one bit. Maybe he would've received even more votes for storming Stormy, because seriously -- the more I'm looking at Trump's camp -- the more it reminds me of Johnstown.
But in his mind he did believe that paying Stormy was preferable in order to improve his chances. As a lay person, I'd say "unreported campaign contribution" is fairly accurate in this context. What else was it? Payment for services rendered?
There is nothing ridiculous about it.
-
You gentlemen are letting your partisanship get the best of you. You make about as much sense as the Republicans who wanted to impeach Bill Clinton for lying about blow jobs. If a Democratic Party presidential candidate did what Trump did in the Stormy Daniels / Karen McDougal case and were prosecuted you'd be defending him.
Michael Cohen was caught on tax evasion and so the Feds were able to get him to plead guilty to the campaign finance charges. Maybe the Republicans can use that as a precedent to go after Joe Biden's attorney for channeling money to his brother. The Democrats want to put all the Republicans in jail and vice versa. You gentlemen should think about who's going to be left to pay for big government if you put all the taxpayers in jail.
-
Biden's Record Breaking Job Accomplishments! Meanwhile back in Detroit...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923619]Now, why can't Trump or any other Repub do this rather than produce all the Great Depressions, Great Recessions and Massive Jobs Destruction of the past 100 years?
And after outgoing Dem presidents hand them much, much better economic conditions than any outgoing Repub ever handed an incoming Dem.
Is it because they just don't want to? I'm beginning to think that is the only possible reason. I mean, damn, not even in 100 years!
[B]Record-Breaking Accomplishments On Jobs And Unemployment Under Biden.
June 7, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/richardmcgahey/2024/06/07/record-breaking-accomplishments-on-jobs-and-unemployment-under-biden/[/URL][/QUOTE]
Great job numbers all around and more good news for Black voters, from Joe Biden the 14th Best President in U.S. History.
[QUOTE]Tight labor markets during Bidens presidency have helped. In April, we saw the [b]lowest gap[/b] between Black and White unemployment ever recorded, and the Biden Administration has been proactive in addressing persistent racial gaps in employment and society.[/QUOTE]
Yet another great jobs report and according to the article, extremely positive news for Black voters looking for yet another, reason to vote for Biden.
Especially, considering the whooper lies, fabrication and blubbering untruths given by Trump's recent awkward [b]"billionaire white man"[/b] pleas and grovelling at a Black church (in Detroit), for the Black vote, in what can only be seen as a pathetic display of desperation, given the fact that, historical data shows, that 82% of Black voters, vote for Dems, Detroit is a Black voting stronghold and only 8% Black voters voted for him in 2020.
But good on Detroit, if they can get Trump to spend a large amount of campaign dollars in their city. I'd love to see it happen!
-
Yes and No
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2924110]You gentlemen are letting your partisanship get the best of you. You make about as much sense as the Republicans who wanted to impeach Bill Clinton for lying about blow jobs. If a Democratic Party presidential candidate did what Trump did in the Stormy Daniels / Karen McDougal case and were prosecuted you'd be defending him.[/QUOTE]Yes what Bill Clinton did was wrong, but it was not an impeachable offense as it was not a "high crime or misdemeanor [B]against the United States[/B]". And no, I would not defend [B]anybody[/B] who did the things that Trump has done. Trump is the worst President ever as he has no respect for the rule of law or the Constitution of the United States, and he was the first President in our history to not abide by the peaceful transfer of power, among other things. The facts prove that he was unqualified and unfit for office, and I hope and pray that the American people do the right and wise thing by not returning him (and his not ready for prime time players) to the White House ever. That would be the best outcome for the country and the rest of the world.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2924110]You gentlemen are letting your partisanship get the best of you. You make about as much sense as the Republicans who wanted to impeach Bill Clinton for lying about blow jobs. If a Democratic Party presidential candidate did what Trump did in the Stormy Daniels / Karen McDougal case and were prosecuted you'd be defending him.
Michael Cohen was caught on tax evasion and so the Feds were able to get him to plead guilty to the campaign finance charges. Maybe the Republicans can use that as a precedent to go after Joe Biden's attorney for channeling money to his brother. The Democrats want to put all the Republicans in jail and vice versa. You gentlemen should think about who's going to be left to pay for big government if you put all the taxpayers in jail.[/QUOTE]Whatever Joe Biden's attorney did with somebody's brother is utterly irrelevant unless they committed a crime in order to influence (steal) an election as their understood and / or stated reason for doing it.
That is what conspiritors Donald J. Trump, Allen Weisselberg and Michael Cohen over there at Trump Org did. And for no other reason.
Nobody in the entire organization uttered one word about the falsification of business records being done to spare anyone's hurt feelings. Not Donnie's, not Melania's, not the bratty kids, nobody's.
It was about influencing (stealing) the election and stated as such by the written description of the scheme by one of the conspirators and testimony under oath by another. The timing of their Election Fraud scheme was precisely at the moment when fellow Repubs were bailing out of endorsing Dear Leader as the election was looming and Trump saw his chances of winning slipping away. It was suggested by one Deadbeat Donald J. Trump to stop making payments on the night of the election because then it would no longer matter if Daniels blabbed. The whole purpose for falsifying those business records would be over by then.
That is why the jurors knew the scheme was all about Election Fraud in order to steal the election and not even remotely about sparing poor Melania's feeling or anything whatsoever to do with anyone named "Trump" personal shame. LOL.
And see, falsifying business records in order to commit Election Fraud and Steal an Election happens to be a Big Deal Felony in the State of New York.
It turns out New Yorkers don't like elections being stolen in their state, even when the theft takes place in their state of a federal election.
And in case you hadn't noticed or read anything about it in a real news outlet or two, one Big Liar named Donald J. Trump actually sent a violent mob of Insurrectionists to storm the Capital and then sat on his butt for 3+ hours doing nothing except enjoying the show and the reports of cops being attacked, maimed and killed, his VP being stalked for a public hanging and the Speaker of the House being stalked for a kidnapping or assasination all because he and his vicious mob of America-haters were a wee bit upset about the Big Lie that Big Liar had told them about an election being stolen.
When, unlike the 34 Felonies that Big Liar named Trump committed in New York State, did not happen anywhere in any state except for at least one other instance of it being done by that same Big Liar in the State of Georgia. Allegedly. LOL.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923954]I don't think Judge "Kangaroo" Engoron's decision should or will be reversed. Trump deserves to pay some fine for misrepresenting his statements of financial condition. But, taking a more extreme example, you don't execute people for jaywalking.[/QUOTE]So, he's found liable?!
Pick a lane. Can't argue that it's "Kangaroo" and then say he "deserves to pay some fine". If he deserve to pay some fine, then he's a loser of civil lawsuit, to which the plaintiff proved in a court of law. Again, "The People" brought evidence and proved their case in court. The loser of the case was not defended well, and lost.
As for the amount, it is arbitrary, but the judge gets to decide how much, not us, not the defendant, not pundits. Happens everyday in court, we don't go around saying how unfair it is for one defendant to pay X, and another paying Y on civil litigations. Sure we can opine on it, but just log that as an opinion, not fact.
DJT could have settled for far less, but chose the path of litigation. That's on him.
-
Hypo World?
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2923967]If there ever was a politically twisted version of how the Rule of Law has not held up to its billing, it's Trump's 34 felony convictions for paying off Stormy Daniels. And I have gotten out and fought. I was a contributor to and card carrying member of the ACLU before it became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party.[/QUOTE]
Nah, not really! Trump's conviction was good for democracy and The Rule of Law. But you'll have to stay tuned, if you want "twisted" as your hero Trump, appeals to [b]"his"[/b] SCOTUS.
As for the ACLU, well we all live with disappointment...everyday! I would liked to watch FOXY Muse, once in a while on a consistent basis, but I can't stand, being lied to. And that is of course, until I found out it is mostly Republican lies and just another Repub/QAnon/MAGA propaganda machine.
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2923967]Sure Spidy. I full support your right to change your sex, provided you're 21 years of age. And your right to use marijuana, provided you're 18 years of age. Also your right to pay for sex with a donkey, provided said donkey is at least 18 years of age and consenting. And finally, if you were a women, I would support your right to get an abortion, provided it's under 15 weeks from conception in accordance with the Trump Doctrine.
[b]These are all hypotheticals.[/b] I believe you're a pretty normal, decent type who's not looking for donkey sex, etc., even though you are a partisan Democrat.[/QUOTE] Tiny 12, between you and Elvis 2008, I don't know who genuinely cares more for my well being? Really...you guys are too much! (...kkkk!) From Earth #2, to your newly constructed, "Hypothetical World" [i][b]aka."Hypo World"[/b][/i] (...kkkk!)
I mean, first there's "Paycheck Superhero", Elvis 2008, telling me, I'm some kind of "gov't paycheck villain" and (BTW I'm still hoping, Spidy will get his a $84 million gov't super yacht, just like Russia gave Zelensky, so he can live up to the super villain billing...), now you, Tiny 12, bring us [b]crime fighting the evils of "partisanship"[/b] to a whole new level, in "Hypo World"?
This "Hypo World", of yours sounds so interesting and very [b]supportive[/b] of the LGBTQ community. Fair enough, I'm curious...I'll play along!
[u]Hypo World by Tiny 12:[/u]
So now that we're in "Hypo World" and one of the superheros "Hypo-Pathetic Boy" (aka.Tiny 12), is dolling out "support" and is on a quest to defeat unjust laws and [i][b]"partisanship"[/i][/b] (especially among the Dems), with his all-knowing [b]bi-partisan "hypo-support"[/b] super power, in what must be, a Repub Libertarian version and spin-off series to Elvis 2008's "Paycheck Superhero" series, back on Earth #2...will our hero succeed?
BTW, Tiny 12, now that [b]"Paycheck Superhero"[/b], Elvis 2008, has had a chance to clear his inbox...have you guys decided, if this new series will be a [i][b]shared delusional collaboration[/b][/i]? Or will "Hypo-Pathetic Boy", solely own the rights, making and direction of "Hypo World" and all the writing support that comes with?
Will this [i]"hypo libertarian support world"[/i] of yours, be a true Repub Libertarian dystopian political drama, with Chase [i]"Armed and Gay"[/i] Oliver, as President, but still in the closet?
Does Spidy, get to play the super villain, again? Does the super villain, get his $84 million dollar gov't yacht? And as the super villain, is [i][b]"withholding support",[/i][/b] Spidy's super power?
Tiny 12, so in your "Hypo World", in the episode where "Hypo-Pathetic Boy" is out of the closet and tells "Paycheck Superhero", he loves him (aah!) and they have a unlawful, but yet traditional bi-partisan LGBTQ marriage ceremony and have sex together in a 3-way with an elephant [i](not sure how that's possible, but anyways it's "Hypo World"),[/i] does an ex-president with 34-felony charges, and a rabid Repub, police and FBI force, hunt down our gay superheros?
Does Spidy, as the super villain, use his super powers and deny the gay superhero couple's rights to wed in a 3-way copulation with an elephant? Wow!...If so, that's some heartless super villain "withholding support" shit you've got line up for Spidy. But I'm sure that episode is going be one helluva tearjerker!
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2923967]Happy to support you on your voyage of self discovery![/QUOTE]Yikes, what now, awaits our super villain on his voyage of self-discovery in "Hypo World"? And what does "Hypo-Pathetic Boy", [u]really mean[/u] when he says, [i][b]"Happy to support you..."[/b][/i]???
Stay tuned for the next episode of "Hypo World", where "Hypo-Pathetic Boy", is sure to amaze us, with more elephant 3-way action and dazzle us with mighty feats of super powered [b]bi-partisan[/b] "hypo-support"!
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2924125]YTrump is the worst President ever as he has no respect for the rule of law or the Constitution of the United States, and he was the first President in our history to not abide by the peaceful transfer of power, among other things. The facts prove that he was unqualified and unfit for office, and I hope and pray that the American people do the right and wise thing by not returning him (and his not ready for prime time players) to the White House ever. [/QUOTE]Talk about your hyperbole. Obama droned and killed an American citizen without a trial and GWB approved the use of torture and could have easily be convicted on war crimes. Trump is not in the same ballpark. You have pure Trump derangement syndrome.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923860]You want them to violate the Statute of Limitations in order to bust me for mongering in other countries 12+ years ago?[/QUOTE]LOL. Seriously, Tooms, you are such a douche. After this "felony" conviction which was at worst a misdemeanor had a two year statue of limitations and New York concocted a way to get around the statue of limitations for E. Jean Carroll, you think statue of limitations is going to stave off a hot to trot prosecutor for you? That is why you are such a douche. You think statue of limitations should apply to you and not to Trump.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923860]Unlike Trump's crimes, the Statute of Limitations for any blow job or fuck I paid for such that the USA would consider it a crime did not get extended that much due to the hold put on the world during Trump's Pandemic. LOL.[/QUOTE]Not quite sure what that means, but I think the time Trump allegedly had sex with Stormy Daniels was 2006. If they could go after him for sex that long ago, why would they not do that with you? And thanks for saying, you engaged in an illegal activity. That was like pulling teeth.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2923860]Have you got a link to a USA Penal Code number that you think I have violated? Please post it.[/QUOTE]That is easy. Let's go with the California law of sexual assault where there is no statue of limitations. All the hookers you have been with in that world are solidly mentally stable and not one of them would not say you assaulted them if they got secondary gain like E. Jean Carroll did? That woman is a complete fucking night job, and I do not even think Trump had sex with her.
Then you have this state misdemeanor statue converted into a federal felony and it really gets stupid. That was completely made up by a prosecutor and a judge went along with it, so I do not have to list any federal statue to get you, I can just convert any state misdemeanor into a felony.
What cracks me up is you think getting a prosecutor and judge together to make up a law and then having a jury in Manhattan convict Trump is this epic accomplishment when it just shows how easy it is to rig a trial. Of course, it will be overturned. It is just a matter of who does it and when.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2924125]Yes what Bill Clinton did was wrong, but it was not an impeachable offense as it was not a "high crime or misdemeanor [B]against the United States[/B]". And no, I would not defend [B]anybody[/B] who did the things that Trump has done. Trump is the worst President ever as he has no respect for the rule of law or the Constitution of the United States, and he was the first President in our history to not abide by the peaceful transfer of power, among other things. The facts prove that he was unqualified and unfit for office, and I hope and pray that the American people do the right and wise thing by not returning him (and his not ready for prime time players) to the White House ever. That would be the best outcome for the country and the rest of the world.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2924148]Whatever Joe Biden's attorney did with somebody's brother is utterly irrelevant unless they committed a crime in order to influence (steal) an election as their understood and / or stated reason for doing it.
That is what conspiritors Donald J. Trump, Allen Weisselberg and Michael Cohen over there at Trump Org did. And for no other reason.
Nobody in the entire organization uttered one word about the falsification of business records being done to spare anyone's hurt feelings. Not Donnie's, not Melania's, not the bratty kids, nobody's.
It was about influencing (stealing) the election and stated as such by the written description of the scheme by one of the conspirators and testimony under oath by another. The timing of their Election Fraud scheme was precisely at the moment when fellow Repubs were bailing out of endorsing Dear Leader as the election was looming and Trump saw his chances of winning slipping away. It was suggested by one Deadbeat Donald J. Trump to stop making payments on the night of the election because then it would no longer matter if Daniels blabbed. The whole purpose for falsifying those business records would be over by then.
That is why the jurors knew the scheme was all about Election Fraud in order to steal the election and not even remotely about sparing poor Melania's feeling or anything whatsoever to do with anyone named "Trump" personal shame. LOL.
And see, falsifying business records in order to commit Election Fraud and Steal an Election happens to be a Big Deal Felony in the State of New York.
It turns out New Yorkers don't like elections being stolen in their state, even when the theft takes place in their state of a federal election.
And in case you hadn't noticed or read anything about it in a real news outlet or two, one Big Liar named Donald J. Trump actually sent a violent mob of Insurrectionists to storm the Capital and then sat on his butt for 3+ hours doing nothing except enjoying the show and the reports of cops being attacked, maimed and killed, his VP being stalked for a public hanging and the Speaker of the House being stalked for a kidnapping or assasination all because he and his vicious mob of America-haters were a wee bit upset about the Big Lie that Big Liar had told them about an election being stolen.
When, unlike the 34 Felonies that Big Liar named Trump committed in New York State, did not happen anywhere in any state except for at least one other instance of it being done by that same Big Liar in the State of Georgia. Allegedly. LOL.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2924156]So, he's found liable?!
Pick a lane. Can't argue that it's "Kangaroo" and then say he "deserves to pay some fine". If he deserve to pay some fine, then he's a loser of civil lawsuit, to which the plaintiff proved in a court of law. Again, "The People" brought evidence and proved their case in court. The loser of the case was not defended well, and lost.
As for the amount, it is arbitrary, but the judge gets to decide how much, not us, not the defendant, not pundits. Happens everyday in court, we don't go around saying how unfair it is for one defendant to pay X, and another paying Y on civil litigations. Sure we can opine on it, but just log that as an opinion, not fact.
DJT could have settled for far less, but chose the path of litigation. That's on him.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Spidy;2924233]Nah, not really! Trump's conviction was good for democracy and The Rule of Law. But you'll have to stay tuned, if you want "twisted" as your hero Trump, appeals to [b]"his"[/b] SCOTUS.
As for the ACLU, well we all live with disappointment...everyday! I would liked to watch FOXY Muse, once in a while on a consistent basis, but I can't stand, being lied to. And that is of course, until I found out it is mostly Republican lies and just another Repub/QAnon/MAGA propaganda machine.
Tiny 12, between you and Elvis 2008, I don't know who genuinely cares more for my well being? Really...you guys are too much! (...kkkk!) From Earth #2, to your newly constructed, "Hypothetical World" [i][b]aka."Hypo World"[/b][/i] (...kkkk!)
I mean, first there's "Paycheck Superhero", Elvis 2008, telling me, I'm some kind of "gov't paycheck villain" and (BTW I'm still hoping, Spidy will get his a $84 million gov't super yacht, just like Russia gave Zelensky, so he can live up to the super villain billing...), now you, Tiny 12, bring us [b]crime fighting the evils of "partisanship"[/b] to a whole new level, in "Hypo World"?
This "Hypo World", of yours sounds so interesting and very [b]supportive[/b] of the LGBTQ community. Fair enough, I'm curious...I'll play along!
[u]Hypo World by Tiny 12:[/u]
So now that we're in "Hypo World" and one of the superheros "Hypo-Pathetic Boy" (aka.Tiny 12), is dolling out "support" and is on a quest to defeat unjust laws and [i][b]"partisanship"[/i][/b] (especially among the Dems), with his all-knowing [b]bi-partisan "hypo-support"[/b] super power, in what must be, a Repub Libertarian version and spin-off series to Elvis 2008's "Paycheck Superhero" series, back on Earth #2...will our hero succeed?
BTW, Tiny 12, now that [b]"Paycheck Superhero"[/b], Elvis 2008, has had a chance to clear his inbox...have you guys decided, if this new series will be a [i][b]shared delusional collaboration[/b][/i]? Or will "Hypo-Pathetic Boy", solely own the rights, making and direction of "Hypo World" and all the writing support that comes with?
Will this [i]"hypo libertarian support world"[/i] of yours, be a true Repub Libertarian dystopian political drama, with Chase [i]"Armed and Gay"[/i] Oliver, as President, but still in the closet?
Does Spidy, get to play the super villain, again? Does the super villain, get his $84 million dollar gov't yacht? And as the super villain, is [i][b]"withholding support",[/i][/b] Spidy's super power?
Tiny 12, so in your "Hypo World", in the episode where "Hypo-Pathetic Boy" is out of the closet and tells "Paycheck Superhero", he loves him (aah!) and they have a unlawful, but yet traditional bi-partisan LGBTQ marriage ceremony and have sex together in a 3-way with an elephant [i](not sure how that's possible, but anyways it's "Hypo World"),[/i] does an ex-president with 34-felony charges, and a rabid Repub, police and FBI force, hunt down our gay superheros?
Does Spidy, as the super villain, use his super powers and deny the gay superhero couple's rights to wed in a 3-way copulation with an elephant? Wow!...If so, that's some heartless super villain "withholding support" shit you've got line up for Spidy. But I'm sure that episode is going be one helluva tearjerker!
Yikes, what now, awaits our super villain on his voyage of self-discovery in "Hypo World"? And what does "Hypo-Pathetic Boy", [u]really mean[/u] when he says, [i][b]"Happy to support you..."[/b][/i]???
Stay tuned for the next episode of "Hypo World", where "Hypo-Pathetic Boy", is sure to amaze us, with more elephant 3-way action and dazzle us with mighty feats of super powered [b]bi-partisan[/b] "hypo-support"![/QUOTE]Gentlemen, Trump deserves punishment for shenanigans he pulled after the 2020 election. I'd however favor an ankle bracelet while you'd prefer execution. He indeed never deserved to be president. He's a world class narcissist who took advantage of his customers, vendors, bankers, and investors. However, he got railroaded in New York. Prosecutors went after him for political reasons. Juries and judges convicted him and awarded large judgements against him because they didn't like him.
And Trump did himself no favors. His contempt and vitriol may have cost him hundreds of millions of dollars. He shot the finger at The Man (that is, the government), and you don't fuck with The Man. A lot of people who hear him say "I am your retribution" react very differently from you. They see someone standing up to unfair treatment by the government. That's part of why you see him improving marginally in the polls this year. Many thought Trump would be a goner after he was convicted of 34 felonies. They thought wrong. Trump was not treated fairly by courts of New York state and many people know that.
Despite the polls, Trump probably will lose. On one hand, a majority of Americans have more faith in Trump's economic policies, and Biden is a feeble opponent. On the other hand, Democrats are mad as hell because of abortion and because Trump tried to steal an election. The Democrats are more motivated to vote. I believe that will give them the edge.
I don't know what I can say that I haven't already. A lot of people are in jail who shouldn't be. A lot of businesses are bankrupted or shut down without good reason by greedy plaintiffs and lawyers. Our justice system is far from ideal. You appear to be all for that, at least when the victim is someone you don't like. Trump may deserve huge fines and jail time for things he's done in the past. But not for the specific claims related to the E. Jean Carroll, Stormy Daniels / Karen McDougal, and Deutsche Bank cases. And this is the United States of America, not some podunk banana republic.
Despite his extreme problems with character, Trump didn't do that bad of a job during his term in office, and despite what you think the world won't come to an end if he's elected again. Yeah, he and Congress ran up the deficit, and his trade policy was sadly mistaken. But Biden was just as bad on those scores. He's the only president who was willing to reach out to people like Kim and Putin. If he'd been president, there might not have been hundreds of thousands of lives lost in Ukraine. Changes in the way corporations are taxed and deregulation during his term boosted employment, increased wages and helped businesses. He did not as Toom believes cause a worldwide pandemic that killed millions.
Elvis seems to have disappeared and you gentlemen are happiest when you can pat each other on the back and pass around attaboys, so I"ll leave you to that for a while. Carry on.
P.S. Spidy I am not gay or bisexual. And I don't fuck elephants. Their pussies are too big.
-
Awwww.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2924302]Gentlemen, Trump deserves punishment for shenanigans he pulled after the 2020 election. I'd however favor an ankle bracelet while you'd prefer execution. He indeed never deserved to be president. He's a world class narcissist who took advantage of his customers, vendors, bankers, and investors. However, he got railroaded in New York. Prosecutors went after him for political reasons. Juries and judges convicted him and awarded large judgements against him because they didn't like him.
And Trump did himself no favors. His contempt and vitriol may have cost him hundreds of millions of dollars. He shot the finger at The Man (that is, the government), and you don't fuck with The Man. A lot of people who hear him say "I am your retribution" react very differently from you. They see someone standing up to unfair treatment by the government. That's part of why you see him improving marginally in the polls this year. Many thought Trump would be a goner after he was convicted of 34 felonies. They thought wrong. Trump was not treated fairly by courts of New York state and many people know that.
Despite the polls, Trump probably will lose. On one hand, a majority of Americans have more faith in Trump's economic policies, and Biden is a feeble opponent. On the other hand, Democrats are mad as hell because of abortion and because Trump tried to steal an election. The Democrats are more motivated to vote. I believe that will give them the edge.
I don't know what I can say that I haven't already. A lot of people are in jail who shouldn't be. A lot of businesses are bankrupted or shut down without good reason by greedy plaintiffs and lawyers. Our justice system is far from ideal. You appear to be all for that, at least when the victim is someone you don't like. Trump may deserve huge fines and jail time for things he's done in the past. But not for the specific claims related to the E. Jean Carroll, Stormy Daniels / Karen McDougal, and Deutsche Bank cases. And this is the United States of America, not some podunk banana republic.
Despite his extreme problems with character, Trump didn't do that bad of a job during his term in office, and despite what you think the world won't come to an end if he's elected again. Yeah, he and Congress ran up the deficit, and his trade policy was sadly mistaken. But Biden was just as bad on those scores. He's the only president who was willing to reach out to people like Kim and Putin. If he'd been president, there might not have been hundreds of thousands of lives lost in Ukraine. Changes in the way corporations are taxed and deregulation during his term boosted employment, increased wages and helped businesses. He did not as Toom believes cause a worldwide pandemic that killed millions.
Elvis seems to have disappeared and you gentlemen are happiest when you can pat each other on the back and pass around attaboys, so I"ll leave you to that for a while. Carry on.
P.S. Spidy I am not gay or bisexual. And I don't fuck elephants. Their pussies are too big.[/QUOTE]*sniff*.
*sniff*.
No, really, something got in my eye. Not crying. Really.
*sniff*.
You almost had me feeling sorry for the old multiple bankrupt businesses, skyrocketing deficits with nothing to show for it, failed trade war, industry recessions-causing, Pandemic-creating, Insurrection-inciting, cop-killing, election-stealing, democracy-overthrowing fool.
Until I remembered this:
[B]Trump disbanded NSC pandemic unit that experts had praised.[/B]
[URL]https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-ap-top-news-virus-outbreak-barack-obama-public-health-ce014d94b64e98b7203b873e56f80e9a[/URL]
[B]Trump administration cut pandemic early warning program in September (2019).
Predict project wound down three months before outbreak.
Project had identified 160 potentially dangerous coronaviruses.[/B]
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/03/trump-scrapped-pandemic-early-warning-program-system-before-coronavirus[/URL]
Followed by an acknowledgment and admission by Trump himself that his decisions in 2018 and 2019 caused his Pandemic:
[QUOTE]Trump: "It came out of China. And it should've been stopped. And to be honest with you, Barron, they should've let it be known it was a problem two months earlier. The world wouldn't have a problem. We could have stopped it easily."[/QUOTE][URL]https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/news/bob-woodward-stunned-trump-told-091902598.html[/URL]
Followed by a year of him trying to deflect from his worst economic and national security decisions in history by lying about the risk and threat of the virus, mocking the known mitigation measures and convincing anyone stupid enough to listen to him that a vaccine should not me invented or taken; "We've got this under control, it is disappearing already, it will go away without a vaccine"!
And so I concluded once again that monetary penalties for a self-described multi multi multi Billionaire has to be much, much larger than for, say, one of the 20+ Millon Americans whose job was wiped out thanks to that dude's horrific economic and national security policies and stewardship.
And that, yep, severe penalties are due a con man who conspired to commit Election Fraud in order to "influence" (steal) an election, without which theft we never would have had that skyrocketing deficit with nothing to show for it except 1 million fewer jobs created with it than without it, Trump's Pandemic, 1 Million+ Americans mass murdered from it, millions more mass murdered around the world, a historic global economic disaster, massive jobs destruction, supply-chains collapsed, the hyper-inflation and skyrocketing costs of rent, food and gas that followed.
Oh, and that continuing attempt to overthrow American democracy initiated with a War Against America on January 6, 2021, on American soil, declared by him, complete with war deaths, casualties, warriors and hostages while he spent all 1,460 days of his so-called presidency perfectly happy that the USA Military was directly engaged in boots-on-the-ground combat in a War started by the previous Repub potus thingy, too.
There has been no so-called potus, correction, no single person more responsible for more deaths of Americans, more businesses destroyed and jobs lost, more war-mongering, including on American soil, and more in violation of an elected official's Oath of Office to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America than Donald J. Trump.
Sure, in the minds of Repub Wingers, that result is "not that bad of a job" for just 4 years of effort between golf excursions and no reason to worry about repeating "4 More Years" of it ASAP.
-
Trump's 1st Term was a historic economic disaster. 2nd Term would be worse!
Remember Larry Summers, the darling of Mainstream Media back when he was Terrorizing Repubs Into jacking up Trump's Pandemic Inflation higher and longer than it would have been if only they would stop demonizing the brilliant Bidenomics and trust Biden and his team for what is best for the worldwide recovery from Trump's Pandemic?
Well, he's back. Except this time he has learned his lesson about contradicting much better economic recovery and expansion minds in Biden and his administration so now he is agreeing with them on what a holy hell of a greater disaster Trump's 2nd term would be than his 1st historically horrific Term.
LOL. Consequently, you probably won't see Summers showing up on many MSM outlets to share his views and have to search him out on sites like this one:
[B]Summers Says Trump Tax Ideas Mean Mother of All Stagflations
Former Treasury secretary warns of 10% mortgage rates.
Summers urges GOP-leaning economists, executives to speak up.
June 14, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-06-14/summers-says-trump-tax-ideas-mean-mother-of-all-stagflations[/URL]
In a 2nd time around, Trump won't even need to search out, embrace and exacerbate a "Once in 100 Years Disaster" opportunity like most Repubs do and, for just one example, the Trump's Pandemic he created in order to fulfill his Republican Party duty to Crash the Ecomomy, Wipe Out Millions of Jobs and Plunge America Into Another Great Repub Depression / Recession.
All he will need to do is to keep some or most of his campaign promises.
-
Just Deserts
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2924302]Gentlemen, Trump deserves punishment for shenanigans he pulled after the 2020 election. I'd however favor an ankle bracelet while you'd prefer execution. He indeed never deserved to be president. He's a world class narcissist who took advantage of his customers, vendors, bankers, and investors. However, he got railroaded in New York. Prosecutors went after him for political reasons. Juries and judges convicted him and awarded large judgements against him because they didn't like him.[/QUOTE]I love it when other people try to tell me what I think without actually asking and / or listening to me LOL! And no, Chump has lost in both civil and criminal trials, not because he isn't liked, but because the prosecutions / plaintiffs presented the facts in a way to convince the triers of fact, either by a preponderance of the evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt, to decide against Chump. The legal system and the rule of law at work. Chump is not above the law and must pay dearly for his wrongs against other people and the nation. And guess what? If and when the other cases go to trial he's going to lose those too! The idiot is his own worst enemy, he's been a loser throughout his entire career if you look at it closely, and he makes it just oh so easy for the other side to beat him down. Because you see, he's incredibly stupid! Which is so ironic since he called everybody else stupid. He could get started with smartening up by buttoning up his big mouth! Of course, we know he won't do that. I say again. Be patient. The other shoes are going to drop. Chump isn't done getting his!
-
Yes, the system is NOT ideal
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2924302]I don't know what I can say that I haven't already. A lot of people are in jail who shouldn't be. A lot of businesses are bankrupted or shut down without good reason by greedy plaintiffs and lawyers. Our justice system is far from ideal. You appear to be all for that, at least when the victim is someone you don't like. Trump may deserve huge fines and jail time for things he's done in the past. But not for the specific claims related to the E. Jean Carroll, Stormy Daniels / Karen McDougal, and Deutsche Bank cases. And this is the United States of America, not some podunk banana republic.
[/QUOTE]If you read some research into % of wrongly convicted, it comes to about 5% in criminal cases. [URL]https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/magazine/magazine_article/a-matter-of-conviction/[/URL].
I'm going to assume that the jurors got it right, and that he's not one of the 5%. Time will tell with appeals. Haven't got your take on the 34 guity verdict. I've only been responding to your take on the State of NY V. DJT.
I agree with this sentiment that it is not ideal. So, what we do in a democracy is try to fix these inadequacies by writing legislations to address these problems, over time. You can urge your congressman / senators to write these legislations. That's how it will be fixed.
From: [URL]https://www.dictionary.com/browse/banana-republic[/URL].
Word History and Origins.
Origin of banana republic1.
Coined by O. Henry (def) in his short-story collection Cabbages and Kings (1904); originally used to describe those agrarian countries of Central America dependent in the early 20th century on foreign investment in fruit exports.
Noun.
, Usually Disparaging.
1. a small, poor country, often reliant on a single export or limited resource, governed by an authoritarian regime and characterized by corruption and economic exploitation by foreign corporations conspiring with local government officials.
2. any exploitative government that functions poorly for its citizenry while disproportionately benefiting a corrupt elite group or individual.
By definition, none of these applies to the case against DJT. I'm going to assume that you're leaning on #2 to prove your point. However, we still have free speech, economy is benefiting most, no war or strifes in the country (political rhetorics do not count, as they would be put down in an actual banana republic state), and a convicted felon can still run for president, so no. This IS still the United States of America, when DJT was president, and the last 4 years as well.
-
From Black Church to Racist Antisemitic Rally...
[QUOTE=Spidy;2924113]Especially, considering the whooper lies, fabrication and blubbering untruths given by Trump's recent awkward "billionaire white man" pleas and grovelling at a Black church (in Detroit)...[/QUOTE]
Several key points, I forgot to mention, w/r to pathetic plea and attempt to court Black voters, in Detroit, given the following key points, makes those attempts even more pathetic.
First, the vast majority of people that packed the Black church in Detroit, were white. And probably all paid white locals to Trump cultists.
AND
Second, from the highly staged photo op, in the Black Church, Trump goes directly to a racist conservative rally, host by (racist and closet INCEL) Charlie Kirk, who loves spewing, hateful and racial tropes, about women, Jews and the very Black voters, Trump had just attempted to court. I hear after cutting his teeth on bigotry and a sexist war on women, the closet INCEL, graduated up the Repub "hate ladder", to full-on-racist and antisemite.
[QUOTE]We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in 1960's ...
[b]How Charlie Kirk Plans to Discredit Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights Act[/b]
[URL]https://www.wired.com/story/charlie-kirk-tpusa-mlk-civil-rights-act/[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Kirk blamed “Jewish dollars” for funding “Cultural Marxist ideas." According to Jewish Currents, “Cultural Marxism” is an antisemitic trope that purports that Jewish people are attempting to “undermine traditional American values.”
Kirk also said ”the number one funding mechanism of radical, open border, neoliberal, quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits" is “Jewish donors.”
[b]Charlie Kirk turns to antisemitic stereotypes amid Israel-Hamas war...[/b]
[URL]https://www.mediamatters.org/antisemitism/charlie-kirk-turns-antisemitic-stereotypes-amid-israel-hamas-war[/URL][/QUOTE]
Again, Trump's racist [b]"actions"[/b] and not his (bumbbling) words, tell Black voters what he REALLY THINKS of the black community. Again, is it any wonder why he only got 8% of the Black vote.
-
Hypothetical Apology?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2924302]Gentlemen, ...
P.S. Spidy I am not gay or bisexual. And I don't fuck elephants. Their pussies are too big.[/QUOTE]Hey Tiny 12, [B]no need to apologize![/B] After all, in your own words:
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923967]These are all hypotheticals. [/QUOTE]Darn it! But won't fans of "Hypo World", (not to mention "Paycheck Superhero") be tad disappointed with this plot and character twist?
Well, Tiny 12, your self-realization, made me think of something you once told me (but not in a creepy kind of way):
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2923967]Happy to support you on your voyage of self discovery![/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2924302]Gentlemen, Trump deserves punishment for shenanigans he pulled after the 2020 election. I'd however favor an ankle bracelet while you'd prefer execution. He indeed never deserved to be president. He's a world class narcissist who took advantage of his customers, vendors, bankers, and investors. However, he got railroaded in New York. Prosecutors went after him for political reasons. Juries and judges convicted him and awarded large judgements against him because they didn't like him.
And Trump did himself no favors. His contempt and vitriol may have cost him hundreds of millions of dollars. He shot the finger at The Man (that is, the government), and you don't fuck with The Man. A lot of people who hear him say "I am your retribution" react very differently from you. They see someone standing up to unfair treatment by the government. That's part of why you see him improving marginally in the polls this year. Many thought Trump would be a goner after he was convicted of 34 felonies. They thought wrong. Trump was not treated fairly by courts of New York state and many people know that.
Despite the polls, Trump probably will lose. On one hand, a majority of Americans have more faith in Trump's economic policies, and Biden is a feeble opponent. On the other hand, Democrats are mad as hell because of abortion and because Trump tried to steal an election. The Democrats are more motivated to vote. I believe that will give them the edge.[/QUOTE]Tiny, you have to look at Trump the movement versus Trump the man. As a man Trump is flawed as every man is. If you say Biden is virtuous and deserving, I would puke. After GWB and Obama, the people felt left behind. People saw HRC say one thing to the Goldman bankers and another to the people in the hood. In 2008, Obama had a much better handle on the Great Recession than McCain, but as soon as he got in power, none of the thieving bankers went to jail, and Obama was yucking it up with them a few months after being elected. He also sent his more progressive (it was not a dirty word in 2009) economists to the back of the bus and got a bunch of Washington and Wall Street insiders. If there was one exchange that epitomized this disconnect was billionaire Charlie Munger telling an average American to "suck it up" after the taxpayer backed bailouts to banksters like him came through.
Obama was going to win in 2012, and the Republicans could not have picked a worse candidate than Romney, another bankster creature. In 2016, Trump, a billionaire, was the anti-bankster. Finally, there was a guy with enough money to tell the truth, to offend the corporate thieves if need be. That is what people do not get. Oh, Trump is a thief. Really? Compared to the banks or MIC? Please!
The irony is the same thing was going on with Democrats. Bernie Sanders was the clean not corporate candidate. The problem is the primaries were not clean. If they were, Bernie is the Dem nominee in 2016 and 2020. Instead the Dems are chock full of superdelegates who the banksters have bought and paid for, and that means Biden in 2020 and HRC in 2016.
Unlike almost any other pol, Trump caught the populist, anti-bankster, anti-deep state wave and has ridden it better than anyone. It is not love for Trump but love for the movement that has been propelling Trump. Trump got caught up in the deep state bullshit that was Covid.
I know you disagree, but I think anyone who looks at the latest slew of emails and Fauci testimonies can see, we had an out of control NIH that funded creation of the Covid virus. I cannot think of anything that can piss us off more than elevating pandemic causing government dickhead, Anthony Fauci, at the expense of Trump. The vaccine worked great in the Spring of 2021, was partially effective that summer, and did not do shit by Fall of 2021. Instead of being honest about the vaccine, which would have hurt Big pharma pockets, this fucker Fauci pushed even MORE of the ineffective vaccine, and NIH scientists benefitted to the tune of billions. Just like with the great recession, those who caused the crisis were rewarded while the average American was screwed.
What got me is the divergence. No one supported the banks in 2008 but now due to censorship and spin, you have a large number of Democratic douches like Tooms who blame the pandemic on Trump and say "more government" would have been the solution. You even had this ridiculous government fan boy movement when Trump got elected.
People are not even voting for Trump. Lately, you are seeing the ultimate deep state douchery. The Dems / deep state are actually running a guy who cannot walk and talk. This entertainment writer is one of the most partisan hacks there is and here is what he wrote: [URL]https://lefsetz.com/wordpress/2024/06/12/the-biden-freeze-video/[/URL].
But we're told by believers to. Still believe. As if sheer will will change reality. This is no different from the religious right believing that prayer will solve all their problems. Can't anybody live in reality?
So let's say you're not sure who to vote for, the very few who will decide this election. You see this video and ask yourself. Is this guy up to the job? And if he dies in office do we want Kamala Harris?
Can't anybody live in reality, see what's right in front of their eyes? End of link.
Well, certainly over half of America does not believe the deep state bullshit. We see the attempt to keep Trump off the ballot in blue states, the civil trial against Trump in New York, the sheer idiocy of sending a SWAT team to the residence of a former president, and now this absolutely fucking asinine criminal case against Trump is a deep state admission that this demented, barely able to walk and talk shell of a man has no chance against Trump unless the deep state empties all its bag of tricks.
What I have learned from these Democratic douches is nothing is too much. Outside of an unexpected development, the only way Trump loses is if he is assassinated, and it is not just Tucker Carlson talking about it. You may prefer the term partisan Democrat to Democratic douches. Believe me, Democratic douches is not even strong enough.
These assholes have shown not one scintilla of remorse about all the anti-Democratic bullshit being sent Trump's way. They like to think it is about the man and not the movement which you just mistook as well. There is not a doubt in my body that with these assholes they would be cheering on Trump being killed by the deep state.
And these fucking stupid douches think that would be the end of it. The idea that killing Trump might mean they get killed is over their heads. They do not even get they are in the minority now. All the FBI is not on your side. All the CIA is not on your side. All the military is not on your side.
And you mean to tell me after the bullshit about the two impeachments, J6 and its lies, the censorship-social media complex, and this lawfare bullshit that 2020 was "the most fair" election in history? I have never seen the country on edge as it is now. Is there anybody who wants a demented Joe Biden or Kamala Harris as president? Come on!
-
1 photos
I see now I have been underestimating Trump's Mass Murder count
I am ashamed to admit that I had somehow missed this other Repub Donald J. Trump policy and stewardship decision, one of his first as so-called president after he conspired to commit Election Fraud and stole the 2016 election, that added an additional Mass Murder Victims of approximately 100,000 women and children to his already established count of 1 Million+ Americans and Millions more around the world with his Worst Economic and National Security decisions of all time in laying the groundwork for, embracing and exacerbating with his 1000's of lies the creation of Trump's Pandemic.
I apologize for that.
[B]Melinda French Gates:
Why this election desperately matters.
June 20, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/opinions/melinda-french-gates-biden-election-endorsement-gates?cid=external-feeds_iluminar_msn[/URL]
[QUOTE]As President Joe Biden faces former President Donald Trump in another contest for the White House, the stakes for women and families couldnt be higher.
I've never endorsed a presidential candidate before. My work on gender equality and global health often requires me to work with leaders on both sides of the aisle, so Ive avoided talking publicly about who I voted for in past elections.
But this year is different.
After Trumps first term in office endangered the health of women, compromising their safety and robbing them of essential freedoms, Im supporting Biden this election and asking others to do the same.
[B]One of Trumps first actions as president was reinstating and expanding the global gag rule, which restricted foreign aid to organizations providing reproductive services and, by some estimations, caused more than 100,000 maternal and child deaths globally.[/b]
The former president imposed restrictions on the federal family planning program, Title X, that made it harder for people from low-income backgrounds to access contraceptives. His often divisive, sometimes violent rhetoric throughout his campaigns and administration from the sexist attacks he lobbed at women journalists to calling for his opponent to be jailed has contributed to a hostile political climate for women in office and allowed threats against election workers, most of whom are women, to proliferate.
And he deliberately appointed Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade, which resulted in a decision with far-reaching and catastrophic consequences for women and families.
In the two years since Roe was overturned, emergency rooms have turned away pregnant women in desperate need of care because doctors feared legal consequences. Obstetricians have fled states with strict bans, which could leave women without access to basic services like contraceptives.
The US already has one of the highest maternal mortality rates among advanced economies, and most OBGYNs agree that the decision to overturn Roe has led to more maternal deaths.
On the one hand, Trump has made it clear that, if reelected, he would do nothing to mitigate the damage his administration caused but instead go further by allowing states to monitor and prosecute pregnant women.
On the other hand, Biden has reinstated funding to health organizations for women around the world and fought for reproductive freedom in the US. His administration has supported the right to travel across state lines for reproductive services, preserved access to mifepristone a drug with a 20-year record of safety taken steps to protect fertility treatments such as IVF and worked to make contraceptives more accessible. Hes defended lifesaving emergency medical care for pregnant women and has helped educate doctors and patients about their legal rights.
Whats more, Biden has signaled his broader commitment to women and families by championing historic and sorely needed investments in this countrys care infrastructure.
The US remains the only high-income country without a paid family and medical leave policy, forcing many workers to choose between caring for their loved ones or bringing home a paycheck. As child care becomes crushingly expensive, accounting for up to 31% of a low-income familys earnings, it often makes more financial sense for one parent to leave their job to take care of the kids; in most cases, that parent is a woman.
Not only is the caregiving crisis keeping women out of the workforce, but its costing the US economy billions of dollars. Unless something changes, many women will remain locked out of highly influential industries, from tech and venture capital to media and politics.
Despite the severity of the caregiving crisis, elected officials have failed to place a comprehensive plan on the national agenda for decades. Not Biden.
During his 2020 campaign, Biden made caregiving a central plank of his platform, and in the White House, hes led efforts to make care more affordable for families and boost compensation and job quality for care workers. His push to strengthen the child tax credit, which resulted in many lower-income families with children receiving a check on a monthly basis, helped reduce child poverty by nearly half in just one year.
And he continues to fight for more affordable child care, home care for older Americans and people with disabilities and a long-overdue paid family and medical leave policy. Biden is, put simply, the strongest champion for caregivers the Oval Office has ever seen.
[B]While Trump has boasted about rolling back the rights of women, Biden understands that the future of our country depends on them. Thats why Biden has earned my vote. I urge anyone who cares about women and families to join me.[/b][/QUOTE]Thanks, Joe, the candidate for President from the true Party of Family Values, Historic Economic Recovery, Stabilty and Expansion, Job Creation, Wage Growth, Lower Crime, Improved Infrastructure and Effective National Security.
Obviously.
Oh, and thank you, Joe, for continuing to be the most lucid, cognitively competent, sharpest, smartest, best informed, most prepared and fit for the office of President of the United States candidate.
Well, not just the best but, really, Joe is the only candidate with those characteristics and qualities:
-
I promised I wouldn't intrude, but I can't resist.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2924417]
From Black Church to Racist Antisemitic Rally...
Several key points, I forgot to mention, w/r to pathetic plea and attempt to court Black voters, in Detroit, given the following key points, makes those attempts even more pathetic.
First, the vast majority of people that packed the Black church in Detroit, were white. And probably all paid white locals to Trump cultists.
AND
Second, from the highly staged photo op, in the Black Church, Trump goes directly to a racist conservative rally, host by (racist and closet INCEL) Charlie Kirk, who loves spewing, hateful and racial tropes, about women, Jews and the very Black voters, Trump had just attempted to court. I hear after cutting his teeth on bigotry and a sexist war on women, the closet INCEL, graduated up the Repub "hate ladder", to full-on-racist and antisemite.
Again, Trump's racist [b]"actions"[/b] and not his (bumbbling) words, tell Black voters what he REALLY THINKS of the black community. Again, is it any wonder why he only got 8% of the Black vote.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Spidy;2924113]Great job numbers all around and more good news for Black voters, from Joe Biden the 14th Best President in U.S. History.
Yet another great jobs report and according to the article, extremely positive news for Black voters looking for yet another, reason to vote for Biden.
Especially, considering the whooper lies, fabrication and blubbering untruths given by Trump's recent awkward [b]"billionaire white man"[/b] pleas and grovelling at a Black church (in Detroit), for the Black vote, in what can only be seen as a pathetic display of desperation, given the fact that, historical data shows, that 82% of Black voters, vote for Dems, Detroit is a Black voting stronghold and only 8% Black voters voted for him in 2020.
But good on Detroit, if they can get Trump to spend a large amount of campaign dollars in their city. I'd love to see it happen![/QUOTE]Here's CNN's numbers guy, Harry Enten, describing how "we're careening towards a historic performance (among black voters) for a Republican President the likes of which we haven't seen in six decades!"
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/video/6355179602112[/URL]
Meanwhile Trump is leading Biden among Hispanics in a number of polls:
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/02/us/politics/trumps-support-among-latinos-grows-new-poll-shows.html[/URL] Trump 46%, Biden 40%.
[URL]https://www.txhpf.org/2024/04/16/texas-hispanic-policy-foundation-survey-shows-trump-leads-biden-among-all-texas-likely-voters-and-hispanic-likely-voters-by-12-and-4-respectively/[/URL] Trump 41%, Biden 37%.
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/01/trump-biden-latino-voters-poll[/URL] Trump 39%, Biden 34%.
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/19/trump-wipes-out-bidens-lead-with-latino-voters-in-2024-cnbc-survey-.html[/URL] Trump up by 5-points with Latino voters.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2924334][B]Summers Says Trump Tax Ideas Mean Mother of All Stagflations[/B][/QUOTE]
I happen to agree with Summers about tariffs. I'm not going to tell you why though because I'm pouting.
-
6 photos
Whew!
Oh, man, that was so close! For one New York minute there I thought the only way to prevent another Trump / Repub so-called presidency of Great Repub Economic Disaster, Massive Repub Jobs Destruction, policies and stewardship results that always lead to inflicting life-altering damage to the American Working Men and Women, creating Pandemics and any other "Once in 100 Years Disaster" they can glom onto while only enriching the already wealthy elite, corporations and, of course, THE BANKS, was to wish for a whatsisname assassination.
Fortunately, it turns out the more the American people and electorate feel and recognize Great President Joe Biden's historic economic and national security accomplishments for them, and the more they see and hear Joe Biden appearing on television and campaigning in person in the critical battleground states, including the only 3 that really matter in terms of those 270 Electoral Votes needed for The Win, the more they realize the America-hating numbskulls who tried to con them with their phony spin, tightly edited and cropped faked videos and recordings into believing the clearly brilliant Joe Biden is not able to string two words together, can't walk or talk, doesn't know who he is or where he is, etc, are just a bunch of desperate, hopeless, America-hating liars.
Consequently, even now, even without a fantasized assassination plot, beginning well before Trump was convicted of 34 Felonies for conspiring to commit Election Fraud to steal the 2016 Election, the sight and sound and intelligence and incomparable accomplishments and words and ideas and plans and deeds of Joe Biden has been enough to produce a favorable trend to him that today brings him to within a rounding error in just one state of being ahead in ALL of the Polling Averages that matter.
And, in the real world, that rounding error difference in just one critical state can so easily be overcome for Joe with his Party's effective Get-Out-The-Vote / Ground Game presence in those battleground states as well as the perfectly reasonable expected outcome of him utterly destroying Know Nothing, Do Nothing Repub Trump in any debate Trump can't run, er waddle, and hide from as well as the spectacular Clown Show of a Repub National Convention propelling Joe even closer to an easy well-deserved and well-earned 2nd term win in November.
At least, that is what the generally accepted No Toss-Up States Electoral College Map shows; that Joe Biden only needs to add WI, MI and PA to the rest of his No Toss-Up EC tally in order to win it.
And when we look at the far more credible 538 Polls Site, rather than the provable demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics' Consensus of Polls (which also show Biden to within a statistical tie on every poll that matters, too. But they don't or won't update their Consensus / Averages that reflect the favorable trends and momentum toward Biden. And they insist on including Winger Polls like the ridiculous Rassmussen Poll, which 538 won't even include because it is so Winger-rigged), we see that:
Biden is already ahead in the National Poll Averages.
Biden is ahead in the WI poll Averages.
Biden is ahead in the MI poll Averages.
Biden is within a fraction of one percentage point of being ahead in the PA Poll Averages, with the momentum and trends at least since his terrific State of the Union Address in his favor and with those debates, conventions and 4 more months of sight and sound, appearance and words, accomplishments and plans campaigning ahead!
Yes, all things considered, Joe Biden would very likely win the election even if it were held next Tuesday instead of 4 more months of Tuesdays from now:
-
Allahu Akbar, cognitively incompetent much
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2924717]I am ashamed to admit that I had somehow missed this other Repub Donald J. Trump policy and stewardship decision, one of his first as so-called president after he conspired to commit Election Fraud and stole the 2016 election, that added an additional Mass Murder Victims of approximately 100,000 women and children to his already established count of 1 Million+ Americans and Millions more around the world with his Worst Economic and National Security decisions of all time in laying the groundwork for, embracing and exacerbating with his 1000's of lies the creation of Trump's Pandemic.
I apologize for that.
[B]Melinda French Gates:
Why this election desperately matters.
June 20, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/20/opinions/melinda-french-gates-biden-election-endorsement-gates?cid=external-feeds_iluminar_msn[/URL]
Thanks, Joe, the candidate for President from the true Party of Family Values, Historic Economic Recovery, Stabilty and Expansion, Job Creation, Wage Growth, Lower Crime, Improved Infrastructure and Effective National Security.
Obviously.
Oh, and thank you, Joe, for continuing to be the most lucid, cognitively competent, sharpest, smartest, best informed, most prepared and fit for the office of President of the United States candidate.
Well, not just the best but, really, Joe is the only candidate with those characteristics and qualities:[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/06/21/poll-donald-trump-up-double-digits-on-joe-biden/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2024/06/21/nolte-ap-lies-about-identity-of-migrants-charged-with-murder-of-12-year-old/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR0NIFKfKKidyeG1XEOeq8-PVteNZUC1ExUU3TiS6XtFMfEtc6rnjNIaVJ8_aem_kSRuesUsfClCqvtJHre6vg[/URL]
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/06/20/nyt-analysis-support-for-joe-biden-among-women-hits-lowest-for-any-democrat-since-2004/[/URL]
-
Two Tier Justice System
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2924683]Is there anybody who wants a demented Joe Biden or Kamala Harris as president? Come on![/QUOTE]
Getting slightly off topic, why is it that the state of California paid Kamala Harris a salary of up to $200,000 a year in todays money to bang Willie Brown? And neither had to answer for it? While Trumps facing years in prison on 34 felony convictions for the payoffs to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal when he didnt deserve so much as a slap on the wrist?
[URL] https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?title=Kamala_Harris_As_a_Prostitute[/URL]
Those are rhetorical questions Elvis. You know the answer. It's because California and New York are run by Democrats. Democrats don't like Trump, but they love Kamala Harris and Willie Brown.
From the link, Brown's network of nonprofit groups and committees later paid Carolyn Carpeneti $2.33 million while the two were dating.
You've given some great advice in the Seeking Arrangement thread about how not to overpay sugarbabies. I guess that's irrelevant though when you're using other peoples' money.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2924683]Tiny, you have to look at Trump the movement versus Trump the man. As a man Trump is flawed as every man is. If you say Biden is virtuous and deserving, I would puke. After GWB and Obama, the people felt left behind. People saw HRC say one thing to the Goldman bankers and another to the people in the hood. In 2008, Obama had a much better handle on the Great Recession than McCain, but as soon as he got in power, none of the thieving bankers went to jail, and Obama was yucking it up with them a few months after being elected. He also sent his more progressive (it was not a dirty word in 2009) economists to the back of the bus and got a bunch of Washington and Wall Street insiders. If there was one exchange that epitomized this disconnect was billionaire Charlie Munger telling an average American to "suck it up" after the taxpayer backed bailouts to banksters like him came through.
Obama was going to win in 2012, and the Republicans could not have picked a worse candidate than Romney, another bankster creature. In 2016, Trump, a billionaire, was the anti-bankster. Finally, there was a guy with enough money to tell the truth, to offend the corporate thieves if need be. That is what people do not get. Oh, Trump is a thief. Really? Compared to the banks or MIC? Please!
The irony is the same thing was going on with Democrats. Bernie Sanders was the clean not corporate candidate. The problem is the primaries were not clean. If they were, Bernie is the Dem nominee in 2016 and 2020. Instead the Dems are chock full of superdelegates who the banksters have bought and paid for, and that means Biden in 2020 and HRC in 2016.
Unlike almost any other pol, Trump caught the populist, anti-bankster, anti-deep state wave and has ridden it better than anyone. It is not love for Trump but love for the movement that has been propelling Trump. Trump got caught up in the deep state bullshit that was Covid.
I know you disagree, but I think anyone who looks at the latest slew of emails and Fauci testimonies can see, we had an out of control NIH that funded creation of the Covid virus. I cannot think of anything that can piss us off more than elevating pandemic causing government dickhead, Anthony Fauci, at the expense of Trump. The vaccine worked great in the Spring of 2021, was partially effective that summer, and did not do shit by Fall of 2021. Instead of being honest about the vaccine, which would have hurt Big pharma pockets, this fucker Fauci pushed even MORE of the ineffective vaccine, and NIH scientists benefitted to the tune of billions. Just like with the great recession, those who caused the crisis were rewarded while the average American was screwed.
What got me is the divergence. No one supported the banks in 2008 but now due to censorship and spin, you have a large number of Democratic douches like Tooms who blame the pandemic on Trump and say "more government" would have been the solution. You even had this ridiculous government fan boy movement when Trump got elected.
People are not even voting for Trump. Lately, you are seeing the ultimate deep state douchery. The Dems / deep state are actually running a guy who cannot walk and talk. This entertainment writer is one of the most partisan hacks there is and here is what he wrote: [URL]https://lefsetz.com/wordpress/2024/06/12/the-biden-freeze-video/[/URL].
But we're told by believers to. Still believe. As if sheer will will change reality. This is no different from the religious right believing that prayer will solve all their problems. Can't anybody live in reality?
So let's say you're not sure who to vote for, the very few who will decide this election. You see this video and ask yourself. Is this guy up to the job? And if he dies in office do we want Kamala Harris?
Can't anybody live in reality, see what's right in front of their eyes? End of link.
Well, certainly over half of America does not believe the deep state bullshit. We see the attempt to keep Trump off the ballot in blue states, the civil trial against Trump in New York, the sheer idiocy of sending a SWAT team to the residence of a former president, and now this absolutely fucking asinine criminal case against Trump is a deep state admission that this demented, barely able to walk and talk shell of a man has no chance against Trump unless the deep state empties all its bag of tricks.
What I have learned from these Democratic douches is nothing is too much. Outside of an unexpected development, the only way Trump loses is if he is assassinated, and it is not just Tucker Carlson talking about it. You may prefer the term partisan Democrat to Democratic douches. Believe me, Democratic douches is not even strong enough.
These assholes have shown not one scintilla of remorse about all the anti-Democratic bullshit being sent Trump's way. They like to think it is about the man and not the movement which you just mistook as well. There is not a doubt in my body that with these assholes they would be cheering on Trump being killed by the deep state.
And these fucking stupid douches think that would be the end of it. The idea that killing Trump might mean they get killed is over their heads. They do not even get they are in the minority now. All the FBI is not on your side. All the CIA is not on your side. All the military is not on your side.
And you mean to tell me after the bullshit about the two impeachments, J6 and its lies, the censorship-social media complex, and this lawfare bullshit that 2020 was "the most fair" election in history? I have never seen the country on edge as it is now.[/QUOTE]
Another good post Elvis. As you know I don't agree with all of it. But it's thought provoking. You cant be pigeon-holed. Your views run the gamut, from left to right.
My preferred policies may be more in line with Trump's than yours are. You're more progressive on tax policy than he is. You're also to the right of him on COVID vaccines and lockdowns, although I'd argue those are non-issues now. You, Trump, Bernie Sanders and I more-or-less align on foreign policy. We don't like wars. Bernie and I would spend less on the military than Trump -- I'm not sure about you. On social issues, in his heart Trump is more liberal than what you'd think based on what comes out of his mouth. He probably rues outsourcing the selection of Supreme Court nominees to the Federalist Society, which resulted in the Dobbs abortion decisions. That's going to bring more Democrats than usual to the polls in November.
My major problems with him on policy are his tariffs, his propensity to spend like a drunken sailor, and his disregard for the effect of spending on the national debt. However, Bidens just as bad or worse on all these issues than Trump.
I've worked with two people who are like Trump, in terms of their narcissism and tendency to take advantage of other people. It was complete hell, and I'm not going to give my vote to someone like them. I didn't vote for George W. Bush as well because of character issues. I know two people who know G.W. According to them, he fits Ann Richard's description of his father (born with a silver spoon in his mouth) much more closely than G.H.W. Bush. Futhermore, one of their fathers, who knew Junior reasonably well, said something like "that impetuous son of a ***** is going to get us into a war if he's ever elected president." The father served in combat during the Korean conflict, so he knew something about war. Anyway, I didn't believe Trump or George W. Bush had the character to be president. I believe that history justified my beliefs. One of them got us into a needless war and the other tried to steal an election.
I agree with you that the 2020 election wasn't the fairest in history. Yes, there were undoubtedly a lot of violations of election law, and based on the Heritage Foundation voter fraud database, I bet several times more votes were stolen by Democrats than Republicans. But the fraud didn't come anywhere close to overturning the results. Through no fault of his own, Trump presided over one of the deepest, and shortest, recessions in the history of the USA. People vote their pocketbooks, and in the fall of 2020, they weren't in as good of shape as when Trump took office.
What did happen is that procedural rules were changed for mail in voting and the like, and that did work to hurt Republicans. Part of this was Trump's fault for telling people their vote wouldn't count if they didn't go to the polls on election day. That may have made the difference in the Georgia Senate runoffs in January, 2021, but I don't think it made a difference in the presidential election. Trump would have lost anyway.
While in general, I prefer deregulation over the alternative, I agree that financial companies were not and are not adequately regulated. That was the problem in 2008, and, contrary to the belief of our Partisan Democrat friends*, you can't lay all the blame on George W. Bush and Republicans. Furthermore, at that time, I recall reading that 20% of the profits of S&P 500 companies were realized by financial institutions. That's crazy! Finance should be the grease that lubricates the economy, and the grease doesn't deserve 20%. There are simple steps, like higher requirements for tangible equity as a % of assets for financial companies, that would help. Dont loan people money to buy an $1 million house with no money down who are making $100,000 a year. Also make sure over-the-counter derivatives are backed up by cash deposits. And the sector needs more competition. It's like health care in America, which costs 18% of GDP and produces poor outcomes compared to other countries. I vastly prefer free markets, but they weren't working in 2008 in finance and still aren't today in health care.
Around 2008 to 2011, I strongly agreed with you about the bailouts. My opinion has since changed. I believe they may have avoided a much worse downturn, and the government mostly got its money back.
*See how much better this sounds than Democrat Douches !
-
LOL. Rasmussen
Uh. Rasmussen's poll respondents are pre-selected for their pro Trump Wingerism posts and likes on Facebook.
Given that pre-selection, it is devastating news for Trump that even those virulent Trumpsters could not squeeze out a bigger loaf for him than a 10 point lead in a Head-to-Head and a 9 point lead in a 5-Way against Biden. Lolol.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2924787][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/06/21/poll-donald-trump-up-double-digits-on-joe-biden/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2024/06/21/nolte-ap-lies-about-identity-of-migrants-charged-with-murder-of-12-year-old/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR0NIFKfKKidyeG1XEOeq8-PVteNZUC1ExUU3TiS6XtFMfEtc6rnjNIaVJ8_aem_kSRuesUsfClCqvtJHre6vg[/URL]
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/06/20/nyt-analysis-support-for-joe-biden-among-women-hits-lowest-for-any-democrat-since-2004/[/URL][/QUOTE][B] 538 drops Rasmussen Reports from its analysis.[/B]
[URL]https://www.reddit.com/r/fivethirtyeight/comments/1b9zs1t/538_drops_rasmussen_reports_from_its_analysis/[/URL]
[B]Why are the Rasmussen Polls results so different from all the others?[/B]
[URL]https://www.quora.com/Why-are-the-Rasmussen-Polls-results-so-different-from-all-the-others[/URL]
[QUOTE]Polling is a studied science.
Rasmussen is one laughingstock of the polling universe. (Note Rasmussen is not the only laughingstock, but they are probably the best known giggle, when it comes to the world of conducting polls.)
"Given that the temperature last Thursday, the 23rd of December, was below zero in most of the United States, how likely is it that you will support Joseph Bidens plan to combat Global Warming and Climate Change in the next election?"
Gulp.
[B]That[/b] was a Rasmussen question. On Facebook. Those who saw it, and answered, did not even see the name Rasmussen anywhere. They were targeted, because of things they had written on Facebook in the past. They were pre-selected. Because they were already known to be a Trump supporter. They had no idea they were being counted, and they just knew they were clicking on a link and they only knew that it was freaking cold out, at that very moment..[/QUOTE]
-
1 photos
Speaking of polls
Yes, anything can happen. But 3 days before the 1st of 2 historic presidential debates:
[B]Who Is Favored To Win The 2024 Presidential Election?
June 23, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Biden wins 51 times out of 100
in our simulations of the 2024 presidential election.
Trump wins 48 times out of 100.
There is a less than 1-in-100 chance of no Electoral College winner.[/QUOTE]Of course, Trump is not preparing in any way for this coming debate. Why bother to prepare when your opponent is "weak, feeble, confused, sleeping all the time, unable to put two words together, doesn't know who he is or where he is"?
Unless Trump has been lying to us about that for the past three years. That would be so unlike Trump.
Besides, all Trump needs to do is to explain that his 2nd Term plan is the same as his 1st Term plan:
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2924927]Getting slightly off topic, why is it that the state of California paid Kamala Harris a salary of up to $200,000 a year in todays money to bang Willie Brown? And neither had to answer for it? While Trumps facing years in prison on 34 felony convictions for the payoffs to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal when he didnt deserve so much as a slap on the wrist?
[URL] https://www.rasmusen.org/rasmapedia/index.php?title=Kamala_Harris_As_a_Prostitute[/URL][/QUOTE]LOL. Yeah, the difference between Republicans and Democrats is Republicans use their own money to buy hookers and the Dems use taxpayer money.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2924927]Around 2008 to 2011, I strongly agreed with you about the bailouts. My opinion has since changed. I believe they may have avoided a much worse downturn, and the government mostly got its money back.[/QUOTE]Instead of putting many banksters in jail for out right fraud, Obama got them to pledge allegiance to him and the Dems. So now you have the banking sector pushing the Democratic agenda with ESG scores and DEI initiatives, and the DEI shit is just flat out racist. Watch the video in this report: [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/disney-exposed-vp-admits-hidden-camera-company-refuses-hire-white-males[/URL]#google_vignette.
The only racism and sexism allowed these days is against white men. You have to ask why so many white males like Tooms and Spidy could be Dems then right? Thing is with guys like Spidy and Tooms, they are told, we are racist and sexist against the MAGA guys not you, and they are stupid enough to believe it. That is why they are douches.
So Disney focuses on DEI and ESG to get their stock price up, but it is not working. As of now, the money is flowing to the tech sector and a few companies being hyped with AI. I do not know if there is enough money in the world to justify the tech valuations as they are now.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2924927]*See how much better this sounds than Democrat Douches ![/QUOTE]It is way better. Your post was objective and logical except for this part.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2924927]I've worked with two people who are like Trump, in terms of their narcissism and tendency to take advantage of other people. It was complete hell, and I'm not going to give my vote to someone like them.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKkMWFRcsUQ[/URL] Go the 45 second mark on that video. There is a 30 second short blurb from Larry Elder on why he supports Trump.
In some sense, if you are a politician, you have to be a narcissist. Thing with Trump is he has not sold his soul to his donors like the other pols have, but he has sold his soul when it comes to selling to his fellow narcissists and you sell to them differently than other people. So everything was the biggest and best. Others call it lying. Trump calls it useful hyperbole. It might bother people who think that is lying but for me it is just a sales technique.
Then you have the negotiating where you make a ridiculous offer before getting to a reasonable price. Hookers do this all the time too. So Trump may list a property worth $100 million as being worth $1 billion and sell it for $100 million. Thing is if a buyer gets the property for $100 million when he started at a billion he feels like he got a bargain. If Trump listed at $100 million and sold it for that, then the buyer feels he left money on the table. Time and again, I would see Trump pull this technique with Democrats and foreign countries and time and again, it worked. If you are negotiating, Trump wants you to think he is crazy not rational. That means you will take less.
The real and fair criticism with Trump though is he had to hog the spotlight. Outside of his family, he has not built a bench at all. You cannot do the job of being president alone, and in Biden's case, his bench is running the show, and it is not even a good bench. Trump had to borrow a lot from the Bush bench when he started out, and he has the potential to build a great one if he can mend fences with a lot of people who he has burned. I have seen growth in this area. It was kind of fun calling someone stupid when they were being stupid but you should not do that as president. I have seen growth in Trump sharing the spotlight, and I think Trump can be a great mentor if he sees value in that role. But the previous way he treated others has to stop. Trump needs to quit always having to be the center of attention and stop the thin skinned insult slinging. If that is why you do not want to vote for him Tiny, I get it. Like with Larry Elder though, Tiny, I would just ask that you look at where the ball lands.
-
Repubs drolling over fake polls, once more...
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2924718]Here's CNN's numbers guy, Harry Enten, describing how "we're careening towards a historic performance (among black voters) for a Republican President the likes of which we haven't seen in six decades!"
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/video/6355179602112[/URL]
Meanwhile Trump is leading Biden among Hispanics in a number of polls:
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/02/us/politics/trumps-support-among-latinos-grows-new-poll-shows.html[/URL] Trump 46%, Biden 40%.
[URL]https://www.txhpf.org/2024/04/16/texas-hispanic-policy-foundation-survey-shows-trump-leads-biden-among-all-texas-likely-voters-and-hispanic-likely-voters-by-12-and-4-respectively/[/URL] Trump 41%, Biden 37%.
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/01/trump-biden-latino-voters-poll[/URL] Trump 39%, Biden 34%.
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/19/trump-wipes-out-bidens-lead-with-latino-voters-in-2024-cnbc-survey-.html[/URL] Trump up by 5-points with Latino voters.
[/QUOTE]
It's times like these, when Repubs love to [i]"beat their chests, like a red gorillas in heat",[/i] at how wonderful these (fake) polls have them "winning", in an election yet to be decided at the ballot-box, that I'm ultimately reminded of the 2022 Midterms and the so called [b]"Red Wave",[/b] that turned into the [b]"Pick Trickle"[/b](....kkkk!)
So here Repubs are "beating their chests", pre-2022 Midterms and gloating about a "Red Wave" and "Red Tsunami":
[QUOTE]Signs that the Republican Party is riding a so-called "red wave" to success in the midterms appear to be coming to fruition, with a number of surveys showing the party increasing its lead over the Democrats in generic congressional polls.
[b]The Red Wave Is Real, Here are Eight Polls That Prove It,[/b] Nov 3rd, 2022
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/red-wave-gop-midterms-polls-democrats-congress-1756599[/URL][/QUOTE]
AND THEN this happened:
[QUOTE]Through the first half of 2022, polls and special election results indicated Democrats were on track for one of these midterm bruisings. [u]Then the Supreme Courts Dobbs decision happened.[/u]
[b]Why the red wave didn't come,[/b] Nov 10th, 2022
[URL]https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23448972/midterms-results-democrats-senate-red-wave[/URL][/QUOTE]
And to complete the analogy,...the "red gorillas, beating their chests", suddenly turn, back into angry squabbling chimpanzees.
Now you should know, I'm not one for the polls w/r to elections. So for me...[i][b]Seeing is believing![/b][/i]
So until Repubs, actual drive Black voters to turnout on avg. of 12% to 8% plus or more, for them at the ballot-box, I'll stick with the historically [b]actual factual numbers[/b], where on avg. 82% of Black voters, have voted for Democrats.
But as the Vox article noted, then "Dobbs" happened!
So while Repubs continue "to beat their chests", over a slight uptick in the (fake) polls, with Black and Brown voters, they fail to realize their blind-spot in 2024. The killer surge in the [i][b]WOMEN'S VOTE![/b][/i], for Joe Biden and Democrats, to uphold their freedoms and rights to bodily autonomy.
As a "Republican Libertarian", I would think you'd see this coming? But then again, Tiny 12, wasn't Nikki Haley your choice for the Repub rep?
[u][b]PS:[/b][/u] Besides, [b]nobody in their right mind, wants Trump[/b], as the 2x impeached, 4x indicted, convict, felon, serial liar, tax cheat, wife cheat, golf cheat, business cheat, racist, wannabe dictator, pussy-grabbing, misogynist, porn-star fucking loser, as President of the USA....[u][i]NOBODY in their right mind want that![/i][/u] Or whatever lackey sycophant he appoints!
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2924415]If you read some research into % of wrongly convicted, it comes to about 5% in criminal cases. [URL]https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/magazine/magazine_article/a-matter-of-conviction/[/URL].
I'm going to assume that the jurors got it right, and that he's not one of the 5%. Time will tell with appeals. Haven't got your take on the 34 guity verdict. I've only been responding to your take on the State of NY V. DJT.
I agree with this sentiment that it is not ideal. So, what we do in a democracy is try to fix these inadequacies by writing legislations to address these problems, over time. You can urge your congressman / senators to write these legislations. That's how it will be fixed.
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TheCane;2924397]I love it when other people try to tell me what I think without actually asking and / or listening to me LOL! And no, Chump has lost in both civil and criminal trials, not because he isn't liked, but because the prosecutions / plaintiffs presented the facts in a way to convince the triers of fact, either by a preponderance of the evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt, to decide against Chump. The legal system and the rule of law at work. Chump is not above the law and must pay dearly for his wrongs against other people and the nation. And guess what? If and when the other cases go to trial he's going to lose those too! The idiot is his own worst enemy, he's been a loser throughout his entire career if you look at it closely, and he makes it just oh so easy for the other side to beat him down. Because you see, he's incredibly stupid! Which is so ironic since he called everybody else stupid. He could get started with smartening up by buttoning up his big mouth! Of course, we know he won't do that. I say again. Be patient. The other shoes are going to drop. Chump isn't done getting his![/QUOTE]My argument isn't that Trump didn't break the law, in the Deutsche Bank and Stormy Daniels / Karen McDougal cases. Or that the hundreds of thousands of people incarcerated for, say, drug use didn't break the law. It's that the laws in question can provide for overly harsh penalties, are stupid, and / or shouldn't be applied the way they are by prosecutors.
I agree with you Checkmate that the politicians should work on fixing this. And I agree with you Cane that Trump is his own worst enemy.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925007]It's times like these, when Repubs love to [i]"beat their chests, like a red gorillas in heat",[/i] at how wonderful these (fake) polls have them "winning", in an election yet to be decided at the ballot-box, that I'm ultimately reminded of the 2022 Midterms and the so called [b]"Red Wave",[/b] that turned into the [b]"Pick Trickle"[/b](....kkkk!)
So here Repubs are "beating their chests", pre-2022 Midterms and gloating about a "Red Wave" and "Red Tsunami":
AND THEN this happened:
And to complete the analogy,...the "red gorillas, beating their chests", suddenly turn, back into angry squabbling chimpanzees.
Now you should know, I'm not one for the polls w/r to elections. So for me...[i][b]Seeing is believing![/b][/i]
So until Repubs, actual drive Black voters to turnout on avg. of 12% to 8% plus or more, for them at the ballot-box, I'll stick with the historically [b]actual factual numbers[/b], where on avg. 82% of Black voters, have voted for Democrats.
But as the Vox article noted, then "Dobbs" happened!
So while Repubs continue "to beat their chests", over a slight uptick in the (fake) polls, with Black and Brown voters, they fail to realize their blind-spot in 2024. The killer surge in the [i][b]WOMEN'S VOTE![/b][/i], for Joe Biden and Democrats, to uphold their freedoms and rights to bodily autonomy.
As a "Republican Libertarian", I would think you'd see this coming? But then again, Tiny 12, wasn't Nikki Haley your choice for the Repub rep?[/QUOTE]In your own words, ....kkkkk! This is how I replied to one of your posts:
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2924302][b]Despite the polls, Trump probably will lose. On one hand, a majority of Americans have more faith in Trump's economic policies, and Biden is a feeble opponent. On the other hand, Democrats are mad as hell because of abortion and because Trump tried to steal an election. The Democrats are more motivated to vote. I believe that will give them the edge.[/b][/QUOTE]My point was that most Democrats believe Trump's a world class racist. If so, then why is he polling better with black Americans than any Republican presidential candidate over the last 60 years? Why is he polling as well among Hispanics as Biden? Where I live there are more Hispanics than whites and Trump beat Biden by 57 percentage points in 2020. Apparently there are a lot of Blacks and Hispanics who do not believe Trump is a racist.
I wasn't enthusiastic about Nikki Haley because she's a neoconservative. I'd sure take her over Biden or Trump though. She'd beat Biden like a drum in a general election.
-
More Hypo-patheticals?
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2925028]In your own words, ....kkkkk! This is how I replied to one of your posts:[/QUOTE]
(...kkkk!) They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. I'll take that as compliment!
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2925028]My point was that most Democrats believe [b]Trump's a world class racist.[/b] If so, then why is he polling better with black Americans than any Republican presidential candidate over the last 60 years? Why is he polling better among Hispanics than Biden? Where I live there are more Hispanics than whites and Trump beat Biden by 57 percentage points in 2020. Apparently there are a lot of Blacks and Hispanics who do not believe Trump is a racist.
I wasn't enthusiastic about Nikki Haley because she's a neoconservative. I'd sure take her over Biden or Trump though. She'd beat Biden like a drum in a general election.[/QUOTE]
Repubs and their "Red Wave" election polls (...kkkk!)
And the latest breed of Repubs, just love to wallow in their hypo-patheticals (Nikki Haley...kkkk!), especially when they can't win at the ballot-box!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925007]
So while Repubs continue "to beat their chests", over a slight uptick in the (fake) polls, with Black and Brown voters, they fail to realize their blind-spot in 2024. The killer surge in the [i][b]WOMEN'S VOTE![/b][/i], for Joe Biden and Democrats, to uphold their freedoms and rights to bodily autonomy.
As a "Republican Libertarian", I would think you'd see this coming? But then again, Tiny 12, wasn't Nikki Haley your choice for the Repub rep?
[u][b]PS:[/b][/u] Besides, [b]nobody in their right mind, wants Trump[/b], as the 2x impeached, 4x indicted, convict, felon, serial liar, tax cheat, wife cheat, golf cheat, business cheat, racist, wannabe dictator, pussy-grabbing, misogynist, porn-star fucking loser, as President of the USA....[u][i]NOBODY in their right mind want that![/i][/u] Or whatever lackey sycophant he appoints![/QUOTE][URL]https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-will-not-restrict-access-abortion-pill-2024-06-13/[/URL]
The justices, two years after ending the recognition of a constitutional right to abortion, ruled 9-0 to overturn a lower court's decision to roll back USA Food and Drug Administration steps in 2016 and 2021 that eased how the drug, called mifepristone, is prescribed and distributed. The decision was authored by conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The pill, given FDA regulatory approval in 2000, is used in more than 60% of USA Abortions.
The justices ruled that the plaintiffs, who sued in Texas in 2022, lacked the necessary legal standing to pursue the case, which required that they show they have been harmed in a way that can be traced to the FDA.
The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, in 2022 overturned its 1973 Roe v. Wade precedent that had legalized abortion nationwide, prompting 14 states to enact measures banning or sharply restricting the procedure.
End of link. Oh, wait, you mean that idiotic notion that SCOTUS was a bunch of women hating Republican losers who wanted women stuck in the kitchen at all costs was not true. Heaven forbid SCOTUS does what it is supposed to: interpret law versus make it up. This ruling shows on abortion SCOTUS did exactly what it should have. The mistake was SCOTUS making abortion law.
And 14 states modified abortion law? There goes the notion of abortions being crazy hard to get, and women know that now. I would ask what else you got, but it keeps getting worse for you douches. Speaking of made up crime, former AG and governor of New York just blasted the NY courts for the Trump conviction on Bill Maher's show: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-015xtUSxA[/URL].
I like the fact that the poster of this video shows the clips of Hiliary lying her ass off in contrast as to what happened to Trump. Hiliary actually committed a crime.
Thing is while Trump went across the customary line for personal insults, he abided by the line of not prosecuting political opponents and did not go after Hiliary when he could have. In fact, after all the insults once the election was over, he called the Clintons good people. It took real effort to turn Trump into a reasonable and compassionate person, but you douches did that. Hell, you even did the impossible. You turned a billionaire cheating on his wife into a victim.
Why don't you go back and start lecturing us on how great the American economy is from where ever you are living? Where is that? China? Brazil? Seeing as how in your economy all that matters is those SS checks keep coming, Biden's inflation has been a godsend for you. With nose bleed American inflation, those SS checks keep getting bigger and bigger.
-
Non Hypothetical post
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925032](...kkkk!) They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. I'll take that as compliment!
Repubs and their "Red Wave" election polls (...kkkk!)
And the latest breed of Repubs, just love to wallow in their hypo-patheticals (Nikki Haley...kkkk!), especially when they can't win at the ballot-box![/QUOTE]Let's see how a can't walk / can't talk candidate do against the most brilliant mind of all time on a debate stage on June 27,2024.
I hope all of us watch, or at the very least listen to the debate that day, and see how firm we are of the two candidates.
I'll go out on a limb and say that without constant interuptions while the other guy speaks and without an audience, I believe Biden will do well. If he is a bumbling idiot, then he won't do well.
Please watch it live or the complete debate BEFORE you tune into your favorite channel and let them tell you how you should feel.
PS. Not directed at you Spidy
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2924783] Trump :[/QUOTE]Your first slide says it all! Thanks, Smoothie!
-
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925043][URL]https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-will-not-restrict-access-abortion-pill-2024-06-13/[/URL]
The justices, two years after ending the recognition of a constitutional right to abortion, ruled 9-0 to overturn a lower court's decision to roll back USA Food and Drug Administration steps in 2016 and 2021 that eased how the drug, called mifepristone, is prescribed and distributed. The decision was authored by conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
The pill, given FDA regulatory approval in 2000, is used in more than 60% of USA Abortions.
The justices ruled that the plaintiffs, who sued in Texas in 2022, lacked the necessary legal standing to pursue the case, which required that they show they have been harmed in a way that can be traced to the FDA.
The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, in 2022 overturned its 1973 Roe v. Wade precedent that had legalized abortion nationwide, prompting 14 states to enact measures banning or sharply restricting the procedure.
End of link. Oh, wait, you mean that idiotic notion that SCOTUS was a bunch of women hating Republican losers who wanted women stuck in the kitchen at all costs was not true. Heaven forbid SCOTUS does what it is supposed to: interpret law versus make it up. This ruling shows on abortion SCOTUS did exactly what it should have. The mistake was SCOTUS making abortion law.
And 14 states modified abortion law? There goes the notion of abortions being crazy hard to get, and women know that now. I would ask what else you got, but it keeps getting worse for you douches. Speaking of made up crime, former AG and governor of New York just blasted the NY courts for the Trump conviction on Bill Maher's show: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-015xtUSxA[/URL].[/QUOTE]
There are two ways to look at this. This is the text of the Tenth Amendment:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Well, abortion is not addressed in the Constitution. So should the issue be decided by the States? Or by the people?
I'm all for taking as much power as reasonably makes sense away from the federal government and moving it to the states and localities. Let the Californians do what they want to do, and likewise the Texans.
On the other hand, should this be a personal decision, regardless of where the woman lives? Should the power be vested in the people, instead of the state? I'm a big believer in personal liberty and personal choice so prefer this interpretation, within reason. By that I mean that I agree with Trump, if a woman wants an abortion up to around 15 weeks, I think she should be able to get one. If health or rape or whatever isn't a concern though, getting one after, say, 6 months should certainly be off limits.
While I prefer personal choice, the Supreme Court decision probably makes more sense from the perspective of Constitutional Law.
I believe this is a bigger deal politically than you do. I have a female friend who's beyond child bearing years. She mostly voted for Republicans and Libertarians and was a Trump supporter. In 2022 she voted a straight Democrat ticket, because of the Dobbs decision and because of what she viewed as hostility of Republicans to trans people (her son used to be her daughter).
Republicans should have done pretty well in 2022. Inflation was running 8% around election time, and real wages were lower than when Biden took office. People vote with their pocket books. But Republicans remained shut out in the Senate and didn't win nearly as many seats as expected in the House. I attribute that to the abortion decision, and also Trump's support for certain candidates who were loyal to him but poor general election candidates.
This is a big deal in 2024. American Heroes Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema have been run out of the Democratic Party. They were a bulwark against the worst instincts of Joe Biden and the Progressives. If the Democrats sweep the presidency and both houses of Congress, then they're very possibly going to spend like crazy, raise taxes, and kneecap the oil and gas industry. A lot of pro-choice women are going to go to the polls who might not have done so otherwise. They'll be voting for Democrats.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925043]Thing is while Trump went across the customary line for personal insults, he abided by the line of not prosecuting political opponents and did not go after Hiliary when he could have. In fact, after all the insults once the election was over, he called the Clintons good people. It took real effort to turn Trump into a reasonable and compassionate person, but you douches did that. Hell, you even did the impossible. You turned a billionaire cheating on his wife into a victim.[/QUOTE]
I agree. That's what Trump said after the 2016 election. Some reporting indicates he asked Justice Department officials to go after some Democrats, but I'm not sure I believe all of it. And there was no way he was going to carry through. First of all, his bark is worse than his bite. He likes to convey a tough guy image. But he's a lot more rational than our Partisan Democrat friends give him credit for. He's not going to throw Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Red Rachel Maddow or Joy Reid in jail. Second, American institutions wouldn't let him go after them. Maybe somebody like Ken Paxton would, but he'd have no jurisdiction. Trump had the bad luck to be involved in three major legal cases in a place (Manhattan) where most people hated his guts.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2924998]LOL. Yeah, the difference between Republicans and Democrats is Republicans use their own money to buy hookers and the Dems use taxpayer money.[/QUOTE]ROTFLMAO! I missed this one because your posts are delayed.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2924998]It is way better. Your post was objective and logical except for this part.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKkMWFRcsUQ[/URL] Go the 45 second mark on that video. There is a 30 second short blurb from Larry Elder on why he supports Trump.
In some sense, if you are a politician, you have to be a narcissist. Thing with Trump is he has not sold his soul to his donors like the other pols have, but he has sold his soul when it comes to selling to his fellow narcissists and you sell to them differently than other people. So everything was the biggest and best. Others call it lying. Trump calls it useful hyperbole. It might bother people who think that is lying but for me it is just a sales technique.
Then you have the negotiating where you make a ridiculous offer before getting to a reasonable price. Hookers do this all the time too. So Trump may list a property worth $100 million as being worth $1 billion and sell it for $100 million. Thing is if a buyer gets the property for $100 million when he started at a billion he feels like he got a bargain. If Trump listed at $100 million and sold it for that, then the buyer feels he left money on the table. Time and again, I would see Trump pull this technique with Democrats and foreign countries and time and again, it worked. If you are negotiating, Trump wants you to think he is crazy not rational. That means you will take less.
The real and fair criticism with Trump though is he had to hog the spotlight. Outside of his family, he has not built a bench at all. You cannot do the job of being president alone, and in Biden's case, his bench is running the show, and it is not even a good bench. Trump had to borrow a lot from the Bush bench when he started out, and he has the potential to build a great one if he can mend fences with a lot of people who he has burned. I have seen growth in this area. It was kind of fun calling someone stupid when they were being stupid but you should not do that as president. I have seen growth in Trump sharing the spotlight, and I think Trump can be a great mentor if he sees value in that role. But the previous way he treated others has to stop. Trump needs to quit always having to be the center of attention and stop the thin skinned insult slinging. If that is why you do not want to vote for him Tiny, I get it. Like with Larry Elder though, Tiny, I would just ask that you look at where the ball lands.[/QUOTE]Fair enough Elvis, well stated, both your praise and criticism of Trump. And the Elder segment is a good illustration of your problem with my argument.
Trump does not fact check well. His hyperbole is often misinterpreted for lying. Likewise when Biden lies, it's not not necessarily intentional. It's often because he's losing his mind. It is kind of hard to pass the plagiarism in college and law school off as due to senility though. Perhaps he was crazy from the start -- why would he keep passing Neil Kinnock's speeches off as his own after he got caught the first time?
Your description of Trump's negotiating style kind of reminds me of how he treated Kim Jong Un. At the start he responded to Kim's threats by threatening to blow his country off the face of the planet if he ever dared to fuck with the USA. And it ended up with their meeting in Singapore. Too bad the rapprochement didn't outlast his term in office.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925324]
I believe this is a bigger deal politically than you do. I have a female friend who's beyond child bearing years. She mostly voted for Republicans and Libertarians and was a Trump supporter. In 2022 she voted a straight Democrat ticket, because of the Dobbs decision and because of what she viewed as hostility of Republicans to trans people (her son used to be her daughter).
Republicans should have done pretty well in 2022. Inflation was running 8% around election time, and real wages were lower than when Biden took office. People vote with their pocket books. But Republicans remained shut out in the Senate and didn't win nearly as many seats as expected in the House. I attribute that to the abortion decision, and also Trump's support for certain candidates who were loyal to him but poor general election candidates.[/QUOTE]I agree, Tiny, and I said it at the time that the abortion decision from SCOTUS was a HUGE gift to Dems in 2022. If you are a woman in the 20 to 40 age range, and Biden has been getting killed there, now abortion is a luxury item in comparison to everything else like rent, car insurance, the cost of a car, the cost of a home, interest rates, the border, seeing illegal aliens getting free rent while you are busting your ass.
If you are beyond child bearing age, and you let abortion decide your voting pattern, we are not going to reach you anyway. With them, at some point they are going to look around and ask who cannot get an abortion who wants one, but this is the Joy Behar type of women who has to be hit over the head before they get it. Really for the Joy Behar type woman the abortion issue is a man controlling a woman, and once women see that Dems really are not on their side but just want control over the health care system, this will change. I think this has already changed now to some degree with the women who are informed, but this is an emotional not factual issue. I think the Trump mindset, it is a state's issue, go bug your legislature is the best approach to have.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925324] They were a bulwark against the worst instincts of Joe Biden and the Progressives. If the Democrats sweep the presidency and both houses of Congress, then they're very possibly going to spend like crazy, raise taxes, and kneecap the oil and gas industry. A lot of pro-choice women are going to go to the polls who might not have done so otherwise. They'll be voting for Democrats.[/QUOTE]Yeah, you are right. Thing is I just do not see the country going left here. Europe has gone what they call right. Actually, they have just gone back to sanity from insanity. The European right is not that right wing. In 2022, you had the abortion issue driving Dems to the polls. In 2020, it was getting rid of Trump. Is anyone passionate about Biden? The polls say likely voters. There are times like in 2012 I did not like either candidate and just stayed home. I see that happening a lot in 2024 with Dems. There is so much passion among Republicans now and so many depressed Democrats who cannot believe Biden is running again.
In the end, the ultimate contrarian sign is when Tooms is totally beaten and he just flat out lies. Like on Biden's mental state, Tooms is like, Oh, and thank you, Joe, for continuing to be the most lucid, cognitively competent, sharpest, smartest, best informed, most prepared and fit for the office of President of the United States candidate.
Even the most partisan Democrats there are do not believe that load of bullshit.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925331]
Trump does not fact check well. His hyperbole is often misinterpreted for lying.[/QUOTE]That brought a smile to my face. Thank you Tiny! It's now time for WaPo to rename that famous article into this:
[B]Trump's hyperboles total 30573 over 4 years[/B]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/24/trumps-false-or-misleading-claims-total-30573-over-four-years[/URL]
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925331]Your description of Trump's negotiating style kind of reminds me of how he treated Kim Jong Un. At the start he responded to Kim's threats by threatening to blow his country off the face of the planet if he ever dared to fuck with the USA. And it ended up with their meeting in Singapore. Too bad the rapprochement didn't outlast his term in office.[/QUOTE]Actually, from what I remember, it didn't even outlast a few months. BTW, when Trump said this: "The World has taken a big step back from potential Nuclear catastrophe! No more rocket launches, nuclear testing or research!" -- was it a lie, hyperbole, or just a plain, dumb arrogance of a vain, unintelligent man -- according to your enlightening classification?
-
Mifepristone Ruling is just window dressing...
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2925324] ...I believe this is a bigger deal politically than you do. I have a female friend who's beyond child bearing years. She mostly voted for Republicans and Libertarians and was a Trump supporter. In 2022 she voted a straight Democrat ticket, because of the Dobbs decision and because of what she viewed as hostility of Republicans to trans people (her son used to be her daughter). [/QUOTE]
It's a typical tale told around the country:[LIST]
1. Despite the amusing tales of his favorite host from The View, one Joy Behar, your insights and personal experiences w/r to these types of real life [b][i]"American Women's Sense and Sensibility"[/i][/b] stories, are typically lost on Elvis 2008.
My I suggest you quote him something from Charlie Kirk? Or Pastor John Mark Burns?
2. YES! This is the kind of story, is repeated, several hundred thousand times, around the country, in one variation or another. Somebody knows or has a daughter, sister, wife, mother, cousin, sister-in-law...etc, facing similar healthcare situations.[/LIST]Thing about Mifepristone and Misoprostol, which is the second [abortion] medication you take, is that they have widespread use cases, such as abortion and miscarriage management, assist in the ease of non-surgical pregnancy complications that arise at all stages of a pregnancy and ulcers. So it's a very useful and necessary aid in providing total safe healthcare.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925043][URL]https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-will-not-restrict-access-abortion-pill-2024-06-13/[/URL]
Oh, wait, you mean that idiotic notion that SCOTUS was a bunch of women hating Republican losers who wanted women stuck in the kitchen at all costs was not true. Heaven forbid SCOTUS does what it is supposed to: interpret law versus make it up. This ruling shows on abortion SCOTUS did exactly what it should have. [/QUOTE]
I know this might be difficult for you to comprehend, but that conservative SCOTUS, had very little choice, but to rule accordingly. It was nothing more than decorative window dressing![LIST]
1. Given the fact that the anti-abortion doctors who brought the case hadn't suffer any "concrete injury" and it was the only judgment they could have rendered, without otherwise carelessly exposing their partisan conservatism, w/r to their bias right-wing, "upside-down flag flying", adjudication of the law.
2. They knew full well, had they concocted and sighted some bullshit reasoning to ban Mifepristone, given merits of the brief that was presented by the lower courts, it would have been an immediate "death sentence" for Trump and the Repubs, come Nov 2024.
3. But get this!...The corrupt 2/3 SCOTUS, in not so many words, told the rejected anti-abortion groups and doctors, to come back [i](preferably after the election...nudge, nudge, wink, wink)[/i] and literally give them the Comstock Act (a 1873 zombie law), with which to base their brief on, next time for the win.
4. The corrupt and morally bankrupt 2/3 Conservative SCOTUS, knew full well, that a nationwide Comstock Law, could very well, also mean, contraception would fall within its purview.
5. Women are smart enough to know, this ruling and recent events that means stay of execution, means Misoprostol, IVF and contraception are still on the chopping-block.[/LIST]
So while Repubs dodge political suicide, near certain death and breath a political sigh of relief (way more so than Dems) over the ruling, concerned women everywhere are gearing up to fight SCOTUS, Trump, Repubs and INCELS at the ballot box, come No 2024.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925043]The mistake was SCOTUS making abortion law. [/QUOTE] So does the INCEL care to explain...what does that mean exactly?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925043]Why don't you go back and start lecturing us on how great the American economy is from where ever you are living? Where is that? China? Brazil? Seeing as how in your economy all that matters is those SS checks keep coming, Biden's inflation has been a godsend for you. With nose bleed American inflation, those SS checks keep getting bigger and bigger.[/QUOTE]
Was that your latest attempt at an episode of [b]"Paycheck Superhero"?[/b] Come on now...you can do better than that! And BTW, don't forget my gov't $84 million yacht!
Speaking of the economy and women's bodily autonomy, Elvis 2008, you could always go back to regaling us with your tales of how your girlfriend's pussy and economic might earns way more in one night, than a half-billion dollar generating, Taylor Swift Eros concert in China and Brazil? (...kkkk!)
[b]PS:[/b] Fun Fact for Elvis 2008, w/r to the number of deaths per million, for Mifepristone is five (5) and for Viagra it's 49. Mifepristone is 10x safer than compound V.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2925349]That brought a smile to my face. Thank you Tiny! It's now time for WaPo to rename that famous article into this:
[B]Trump's hyperboles total 30573 over 4 years[/B]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/24/trumps-false-or-misleading-claims-total-30573-over-four-years[/URL]
Actually, from what I remember, it didn't even outlast a few months. BTW, when Trump said this: "The World has taken a big step back from potential Nuclear catastrophe! No more rocket launches, nuclear testing or research!" -- was it a lie, hyperbole, or just a plain, dumb arrogance of a vain, unintelligent man -- according to your enlightening classification?[/QUOTE]What can I say about Kim Xpartan. You're a neoconservative and I'm not. I believe we were in a better position with North Korea when Trump left office than where we are now. After Trump and Kim met in Singapore, North Korea didnt launch any long range missiles, and only one intermediate range missile, until the end of Trumps term. Since then its launched a number of long and intermediate range missiles.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_North_Korean_missile_tests
I was very fair in letting Biden off the hook for some of his lies too, because of his dementia. But both men intentionally lie a lot, and yes, Trump's worse. And yeah, his vanity plays a part in that, including the Big Lie about the 2020 election.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2925339]
In the end, the ultimate contrarian sign is when Tooms is totally beaten. Like on Biden's mental state, Tooms is like, Oh, and thank you, Joe, for continuing to be the most lucid, cognitively competent, sharpest, smartest, best informed, most prepared and fit for the office of President of the United States candidate.
.[/QUOTE]LOL! My ten year old niece is in much better shape cognitively than Joe Biden. And might just do a better job of running the country.
You're right, that there are signs of a rightward shift. Two or three years ago I never dreamed Trump could be polling where he is.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925415]
2. They knew full well, had they concocted and sighted some bullshit reasoning to ban Mifepristone, given merits of the brief that was presented by the lower courts, it would have been an immediate "death sentence" for Trump and the Repubs, come Nov 2024.
3. But get this!...The corrupt 2/3 SCOTUS, in not so many words, told the rejected anti-abortion groups and doctors, to come back [i](preferably after the election...nudge, nudge, wink, wink)[/i] and literally give them the Comstock Act (a 1873 zombie law), with which to base their brief on, next time for the win.
4. The corrupt and morally bankrupt 2/3 Conservative SCOTUS, knew full well, that a nationwide Comstock Law, could very well, also mean, contraception would fall within its purview.[/QUOTE]If SCOTUS wanted the ruling to stand, they did not have to hear the case. In fact, less than 1% of cases are heard by the Supreme Court. And the ruling was 9 to 0. It is kind of hard to call this some evil Republican SCOTUS plan if the Democratic judges were involved.
So where did you get this seriously stupid shit from? Was this from Joy Behar from the View? Or Whoopi Goldberg? You must be wearing knee pads from the times you fall on the floor screaming, "Preach Sisters!
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925415]
So does the INCEL care to explain...what does that mean exactly?
Speaking of the economy and women's bodily autonomy, Elvis 2008, you could always go back to regaling us with your tales of how your girlfriend's pussy and economic might earns way more in one night, than a half-billion dollar generating, Taylor Swift Eros concert in China and Brazil? (...kkkk!) [/QUOTE]LOL. Soy boy, so Taylor Swift is your GF now? Why else make the comparison? And do I have a hot GF or an incel? I know logical thinking is not your strength. Name call your way out of that one Soy Boy.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925415]Was that your latest attempt at an episode of [b]"Paycheck Superhero"?[/b] Come on now...you can do better than that! And BTW, don't forget my gov't $84 million yacht! [/QUOTE]Wait, I recognize that whining. Spidy, are you Joy Behar? It has to be! That makes so much sense now.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925415][b]PS:[/b] Fun Fact for Elvis 2008, w/r to the number of deaths per million, for Mifepristone is five (5) and for Viagra it's 49. Mifepristone is 10x safer than compound V.[/QUOTE]Well, Joy, if anyone would know that, it would have to be you!
-
Abortion and the electorate
The lead opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal today is consistent with what Elvis is saying about abortion. They disagree with Spidy and me. Here are some excerpts.
[B]The Vindication of Dobbs After Two Years
Letting voters decide on abortion has energized the democratic process.[/B]
Democrats are loudly bemoaning the second anniversary of the Supreme Court's ruling overturning Roe v. Wade this week, and that's because they think abortion rights will help them politically. Yet that political frenzy is actually a vindication of the Court's 6-3 Dobbs decision and Justice Samuel Alito's opinion.
The Dobbs decision, which returned abortion policy to the states and the voters, was correct as a matter of constitutional law. It overturned what even liberal jurists in 1973 and since recognized was one of the High Court's worst decisions.
....The Guttmacher Institute said this year "that an estimated 1,037,000 abortions occurred in the formal health care system in 2023. " Even after Dobbs, that was up 11% from 2020, and is the highest figure in a decade. More women are traveling across state lines, sometimes with financial help from abortion funds. This activity is likely protected under the constitutional right to travel, as a federal court recently ruled, and as Justice Brett Kavanaugh suggested in his Dobbs concurrence.
Another factor, according to Guttmacher, is "broader availability of telehealth for medication abortion. " This month the Supreme Court unanimously rejected a challenge to the Food and Drug Administration's regulations on the abortion pill mifepristone. So much for the Supreme Court serving as a rubber stamp for anti-abortion politicians.
The other piece of the story is that the Dobbs ruling energized the democratic process, with results that have sometimes been surprising. Residents of Kansas, Ohio and Michigan voted in referendums to keep or add abortion protections in their constitutions. Those outcomes were driven in part by highly motivated Democrats, but the Ohio initiative won counties that President Trump carried in 2020 with 60% or more, so there were obviously swing voters....
Public sentiment on abortion is more complicated than either party likes to admit. To cite the Gallup results from the first Dobbs anniversary, 69% of Americans said abortion should be generally legal during the first three months of pregnancy. But in the second three months, 55% said illegal, including 52% of women.
That's the reality of American opinion, but for decades after Roe, politicians were free to ignore it. The Supreme Court had made the law on abortion, so elected officials treated it as a political totem.
....Republicans are adjusting, albeit slowly, and Donald Trump is probably right about the politics. "You don't need a federal ban," he told Time magazine recently. "I'm leaving everything up to the states. The states are going to be different. Some will say yes. Some will say no. Texas is different than Ohio. ".
Two years after Dobbs, abortion policy is being settled by the electorate, and it isn't always predictable, but that's democracy...
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/articles/dobbs-two-year-anniversary-abortion-policy-states-supreme-court-democracy-922e8884?mod=opinion_lead_pos1[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925431]LOL! My ten year old niece is in much better shape cognitively than Joe Biden. And might just do a better job of running the country.
You're right, that there are signs of a rightward shift. Two or three years ago I never dreamed Trump could be polling where he is.[/QUOTE]Tiny, I have a friend in the shipping business and he does a lot of military shipping. He is like, "You would not believe how much military hardware is being shipped everywhere. " he showed me his warehouse full of pseudomilitary shit the week after Biden got elected and laughed, "Hey, baby, this is humanitarian aid. " And now he shakes his head and says, "We are sending shit to Fiji. Fucking Fiji!
This stems from a lack of fear as the USA as America's policeman. It is not a role I relish for the USA to be in, but for some of the world's bad guys, it is essential that the USA still be able to project power.
Thing is I do not think the American people are seeing what a joke Biden is in the rest of the world. Usually, the Europeans are very pro-Democratic party. This was put out by an Italian comedy group PRIOR to Biden's the-day mishaps in Europe. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApTyNOXUhSk[/URL].
The Italian actor doing Biden has him so dead to rights it makes the video hilarious. You can see the staring in space, walking with discomfort, the handshaking no one bit. We have seen all this before and then Biden goes to France and pulls the same stunts.
Thing is Trump would be up 5 or 10% in the polls if people saw videos like these here in the USA. Instead we see Joe Biden's obvious mental decline labeled as deep fakes.
Now that the lawfare strategy has gone tits up, the Dems are hanging their hats on the debate. The idea is the Dems are going to get Biden just as right with the debate as they did with him with the State of the Union. Thing is Trump wants people to see how out of it Biden is he is willing to concede so much. Jake Tapper is going to moderate and he has compared Trump to Hitler. They are going to turn off the mike so there is no interrupting and Biden is so feeble the latest is he does not want to do the debate standing up but sitting.
Thing is Biden is going to be given Aricept, a dementia drug (if he is not on it already) and a stimulant like Adderall. Hell, he looked wired up on speed when he did the State of the Union. Then you get into the regenerative stuff like stem cells, glutathione, and Relox. I had an autism doctor tell me several times that he had autistic children speak for the first time when injected with glutathione. It lifts that brain fog that gets worse as you get older.
Relox is ozone which is O3 not O2 and it is injected into the blood stream of stroke patients with an assortment of IV minerals. Sometimes it does nothing. Other times with the hyperoxygentation you see immediate results. I have been told Biden will be getting Relox. Ironically, none of these regenerative procedures are FDA approved.
Bill Simmons, who now is more podcaster than Sports writer, is talking about these alternative therapies on his show. The athlete goes to Germany or Mexico (South Korea is the other big one but it is a long flight), and you get injected with stem cells or have some alternative healing procedure, and the player is ready to roll. The latest I have seen of this was with basketball player Jamal Murray of the Denver nuggets. This guy looked hurt and a shell of himself in the first two games of a series and he did something prior to game 3 and was back to his Superman status, but it did not last and Denver lost.
So with Biden, whatever they are doing, is not going to last. This notion that Checkmate eluded to and being tossed out by the Dems, "We will see how Biden does in the debates" is their last grasp effort to say Biden is not losing it. What the Republicans need to counter with is how bad Biden is now and what will he be like in 4 years?
The Dems are lying about Biden's condition and censoring anyone who dares do what the Italians did, but Biden's condition is so bad that even Democrats are losing their marbles over it. The Dems just think if they can cover it up another 4 months they will win. My question to them is, "If you do win, then what?" Because we damn sure know if Biden wins that the people running the country were not elected, and that is what has been the scariest part of this Biden administration and a future one. Right now, I see governments at the federal and state level kowtowing much more to billionaires and the deep state than the public.
-
Kindly, Speak for Yourself...
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2925457]The lead opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal today is consistent with what Elvis is saying about abortion. They disagree with Spidy and me. Here are some excerpts.
...
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/articles/dobbs-two-year-anniversary-abortion-policy-states-supreme-court-democracy-922e8884?mod=opinion_lead_pos1[/URL][/QUOTE]
I know you may think the article [b]disagrees with what [u]YOU[/u] have said[/b], but could you please kindly indicate where the article and I disagree?
[LIST][b]Note: [/b]I don't have access to the full article, beyond the first page (?), so I'm not sure what else you're seeing, to make you think that?)[/LIST][QUOTE][u]The other piece of the story is that the Dobbs ruling energized the democratic process[/u], with results that have sometimes been surprising. Residents of Kansas, Ohio and Michigan voted in referendums to keep or add abortion protections in their constitutions. Those outcomes were driven in part by highly motivated Democrats, [b]but the Ohio initiative [u]won counties that President Trump carried in 2020 with 60% or more,[/u] so there were obviously swing voters.[/b] ...
[URL]https://pointofview.net/articles/dobbs-after-two-years/[/URL] (Same article from non-WSJ source. First page only...I think?)[/QUOTE]
From the quote above, sounds like the writer, [b]very much agrees with me[/b], and what I've been saying w/r to the [b]surge in WOMEN Voters[/b] and others, when it comes to supporting abortion, IVF and contraception rights and access.
BTW, the writer, forgot to mention (among others) the huge "can-of-whoop-ass", know as the [i][b]"Youngkin Belly Flop"[/b][/i], that the good WOMEN and people of Virginia, opened up, on Gov. Glenn Youngkin, when he tried to ram-rod and force a 15-week ban on abortion.
So again, where are these disagreements?
-
Really?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925431]LOL! My ten year old niece is in much better shape cognitively than Joe Biden. And might just do a better job of running the country.
You're right, that there are signs of a rightward shift. Two or three years ago I never dreamed Trump could be polling where he is.[/QUOTE]Your ten year old niece could recover America and most of the world from Trump's Pandemic without so much as a mild recession at home and no Great Repub Global Depression, swing bi-partisan legislation set to improve infrastructure for decades to come, recover and create millions more jobs than all 3 previous Repub so-called potuses combined, add half the deficit spending in that historic recovery than his predecessor spent even in his 3 pre Trump's Pandemic years, lead the Western Alliance to strengthen and add more members to that alliance despite Putin and his puppet Trump's concerted effort to weaken and destroy it, reduce crime and the unemployment rate to decades' long lows, etc?
Sounds like a future registered Democrat.
I'll bet even at age 10 she has a more intelligent, realistic and freedom-based notion of Reproductive Rights than Trump, every Repub in Congress and all 6 Repub appointees on the Supreme Court.
-
[B]Trump added twice as much to the national debt as Biden: Analysis.
June 24, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/business/4736740-trump-biden-fiscal-policy-deficit/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Ignoring the pandemic relief measures enacted by both presidents, the proportion of debt addition still holds around 2-to-1, with former President Trump adding $4.8 trillion in non-pandemic-aid fiscal debt and Biden adding $2.2 trillion.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2925462]Thing is I do not think the American people are seeing what a joke Biden is in the rest of the world. Usually, the Europeans are very pro-Democratic party. This was put out by an Italian comedy group PRIOR to Biden's the-day mishaps in Europe. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApTyNOXUhSk[/URL].
The Italian actor doing Biden has him so dead to rights it makes the video hilarious. You can see the staring in space, walking with discomfort, the handshaking no one bit. We have seen all this before and then Biden goes to France and pulls the same stunts.
Thing is Trump would be up 5 or 10% in the polls if people saw videos like these here in the USA. Instead we see Joe Biden's obvious mental decline labeled as deep fakes.
Now that the lawfare strategy has gone tits up, the Dems are hanging their hats on the debate. The idea is the Dems are going to get Biden just as right with the debate as they did with him with the State of the Union. Thing is Trump wants people to see how out of it Biden is he is willing to concede so much. Jake Tapper is going to moderate and he has compared Trump to Hitler. They are going to turn off the mike so there is no interrupting and Biden is so feeble the latest is he does not want to do the debate standing up but sitting.
Thing is Biden is going to be given Aricept, a dementia drug (if he is not on it already) and a stimulant like Adderall. Hell, he looked wired up on speed when he did the State of the Union. Then you get into the regenerative stuff like stem cells, glutathione, and Relox. I had an autism doctor tell me several times that he had autistic children speak for the first time when injected with glutathione. It lifts that brain fog that gets worse as you get older.
Relox is ozone which is O3 not O2 and it is injected into the blood stream of stroke patients with an assortment of IV minerals. Sometimes it does nothing. Other times with the hyperoxygentation you see immediate results. I have been told Biden will be getting Relox. Ironically, none of these regenerative procedures are FDA approved.
Bill Simmons, who now is more podcaster than Sports writer, is talking about these alternative therapies on his show. The athlete goes to Germany or Mexico (South Korea is the other big one but it is a long flight), and you get injected with stem cells or have some alternative healing procedure, and the player is ready to roll. The latest I have seen of this was with basketball player Jamal Murray of the Denver nuggets. This guy looked hurt and a shell of himself in the first two games of a series and he did something prior to game 3 and was back to his Superman status, but it did not last and Denver lost.
So with Biden, whatever they are doing, is not going to last. This notion that Checkmate eluded to and being tossed out by the Dems, "We will see how Biden does in the debates" is their last grasp effort to say Biden is not losing it. What the Republicans need to counter with is how bad Biden is now and what will he be like in 4 years?
The Dems are lying about Biden's condition and censoring anyone who dares do what the Italians did, but Biden's condition is so bad that even Democrats are losing their marbles over it. The Dems just think if they can cover it up another 4 months they will win. My question to them is, "If you do win, then what?" [b]Because we damn sure know if Biden wins that the people running the country were not elected, and that is what has been the scariest part of this Biden administration and a future one.[/b] [/QUOTE]Biden wasn't so far to the left before he lost his mind. He supported all of Reagan's major tax and spending bills, the ones that Tooms believes set the USA on the road to fiscal ruin, destroyed jobs and lowered wages (lol). I apparently am much more of a social liberal than Biden was. By the standards of your modern day Progressive, Biden was racist, gay-hating, pro life scum.
So what accounts for the change? Was it dementia, so that now he's easily manipulated by his Handlers? That's the largest part of it. Biden just does what his Progressive Minders tell him to do. A lot of them are Elizabeth Warren acolytes.
The other factor is that Biden was forced to move to the left to remain relevant in the mainstream Democratic Party. Like I said earlier, reasonable Democrats like Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema got forced out of the party. Biden's a survivor. A very old and decrepit survivor.
Here's a list of positions he voted for and / or believed in, back in the day. He's not the same candidate, by a longshot.
Voted FOR Reagan's 1981 tax cuts.
Voted FOR Reagan's 1986 Tax Reform Act.
Voted FOR Reagan's spending reductions in the 1981 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, which including reductions in social security and Medicare benefits.
Voted FOR Reagan's 1983 plan to prevent Social Security from running through its reserves, including increasing the normal age for full retirement benefits from 65 to 67.
In 1997, he voted FOR a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution.
Worked with Republicans to EXTEND Bush tax cuts when he was Vice President.
Repeatedly voted AGAINST school busing for desegregation.
SHUT DOWN harassment allegations by Anita Hill against Clarence Thomas during 1991 Senate hearings.
EULOGIZED Senator Strom Thurmond.
PROMOTED tough-on-crime and anti-drug legislation, like the Comprehensive Crime Control Act.
Voted to BAN homosexuals from serving in the United States Armed Services (The ban was overturned by the Supreme Court in its Log Cabin [B]Republicans[/B] versus United States decision).
Voted to PROHIBIT same-sex marriage.
Criticized Roe versus Wade ruling for going TOO FAR to permit abortion.
Supported the HYDE AMENDMENT which banned the use of federal funds for abortion.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2925462]Right now, I see governments at the federal and state level kowtowing much more to billionaires and the deep state than the public.[/QUOTE]I'm not worried about the billionaires. For every George Soros there are two Elon Musk's. Or Paul Foster's or Trevor Rees-Jones'. Maybe people should get one vote for every dollar they pay in taxes, and let the people who foot the bill call the shots.
-
Wait, I'm what?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925429]What can I say about Kim Xpartan. You're a neoconservative and I'm not. [/QUOTE]Shit Tiny! Every day I keep learning new things about myself. At my ripe age that can't be healthy.
-
Then Joe obviously fully recovered from dementia after those Reagan results came in.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925519]Biden wasn't so far to the left before he lost his mind. He supported all of Reagan's major tax and spending bills, the ones that Tooms believes set the USA on the road to fiscal ruin, destroyed jobs and lowered wages (lol). I apparently am much more of a social liberal than Biden was. By the standards of your modern day Progressive, Biden was racist, gay-hating, pro life scum.
So what accounts for the change? Was it dementia, so that now he's easily manipulated by his Handlers? That's the largest part of it. Biden just does what his Progressive Minders tell him to do. A lot of them are Elizabeth Warren acolytes.
The other factor is that Biden was forced to move to the left to remain relevant in the mainstream Democratic Party. Like I said earlier, reasonable Democrats like Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema got forced out of the party. Biden's a survivor. A very old and decrepit survivor.
Here's a list of positions he voted for and / or believed in, back in the day. He's not the same candidate, by a longshot.
Voted FOR Reagan's 1981 tax cuts.
Voted FOR Reagan's 1986 Tax Reform Act.
Voted FOR Reagan's spending reductions in the 1981 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, which including reductions in social security and Medicare benefits.
Voted FOR Reagan's 1983 plan to prevent Social Security from running through its reserves, including increasing the normal age for full retirement benefits from 65 to 67.
In 1997, he voted FOR a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution.
Worked with Republicans to EXTEND Bush tax cuts when he was Vice President.
Repeatedly voted AGAINST school busing for desegregation.
SHUT DOWN harassment allegations by Anita Hill against Clarence Thomas during 1991 Senate hearings.
EULOGIZED Senator Strom Thurmond.
PROMOTED tough-on-crime and anti-drug legislation, like the Comprehensive Crime Control Act.
Voted to BAN homosexuals from serving in the United States Armed Services (The ban was overturned by the Supreme Court in its Log Cabin [B]Republicans[/B] versus United States decision).
Voted to PROHIBIT same-sex marriage.
Criticized Roe versus Wade ruling for going TOO FAR to permit abortion.
Supported the HYDE AMENDMENT which banned the use of federal funds for abortion.
I'm not worried about the billionaires. For every George Soros there are two Elon Musk's. Or Paul Foster's or Trevor Rees-Jones'. Maybe people should get one vote for every dollar they pay in taxes, and let the people who foot the bill call the shots.[/QUOTE]If Biden voted FOR all those Reagan Economic Disasters, then he certainly has changed and the change didn't occur in the past 3 years. I'm guessing he changed by no longer voting FOR Great Repub Recessions, Skyrocketing Debt with nothing to show for it, gross underperformance in jobs creation, skyrocketing unemployment rates, etc and instead to vote FOR no Great Recessions, no massive jobs destruction, no skyrocketing unemployment rates, no skyrocketing debt with nothing to show for it at least immediately after Bill Clinton was elected.
No, not because he began to suffer from dementia right after those Reagan Disasters. Apparently because he recovered FROM dementia afterwards. A welcome change in Joe indeed.
You know, that was about the same time I fully recovered from my pro Repub "Bothsider / Neithersider" dementia too.
After voting FOR Reagan in 1980 and, yes, like Biden at the time, essentially FOR Reagan's economic Disasters, I changed, recovered from at least that first stage of dementia and vowed never to vote for a Repub again.
But it wasn't until Clinton's 2nd term as POTUS that I fully recovered and vowed never to vote for a non Democrat again. Ever. At any level.
That decision marks a full recovery from dementia. Which I assume Joe Biden has also maintained ever since making those horrible mistakes in supporting Reagan's policies.
-
And yes Elvis, agreeing to a debate moderated by Jake Tapper and Dana Bash wasn't the brightest move by the Trump campaign. CNN has some people who aren't biased. Those two are not among them. How are you going to be treated by someone who believes you're Hitler?
-
Don't worry
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925583]And yes Elvis, agreeing to a debate moderated by Jake Tapper and Dana Bash wasn't the brightest move by the Trump campaign. CNN has some people who aren't biased. Those two are not among them. How are you going to be treated by someone who believes you're Hitler?[/QUOTE]We have all heard the incessant whining, whimpering, wild conspiracy theories and neverending lame excuses for why everyone who knows Trump, works with Trump, has ever seen, heard and observed Trump, as well as Trump himself, is certain he will totally fuck it up on style, technique and, most assuredly, on content vs "a feeble old man who can't walk, can't talk, can't put two words together, doesn't know who he is or where he is unless he chugs a quart of Mountain Dew moments before airtime. ".
Rest assured, Mainstream Media will try very, very hard to be as generous and forgiving as possible to Trump's pathetically fragile snowflake nature when that happens, as it is totally logical to expect to happen.
-
Supreme Court - Social Media
[URL]https://www.npr.org/2024/06/26/nx-s1-5003970/supreme-court-social-media-case[/URL]
6-3 decision for the government.
"Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said that the plaintiffs had failed to make the case that the companies' actions could be traced to pressure from the Biden administration. ".
-
Dummest attack on a presidential candidate
Let me get this straight, SOME people are opposed to someone taking a drug that makes a potential president smarter, more accute, and a better communicator.
1. No such drugs in any scientific documents, but let's play this game. Name that drug! Because I might want it too.
2. I WANT my president to be sharp for reasons such as making the right decisions to solve problems for the country.
3. There's a drug that solved dementia and, for this debate, SOME people are opposed to it. huh!!!
This is such a weird distraction, and yet there are people gripping onto it.
-
Anti Vax Wingers and Winger Election Thieves must be absolutely livid!
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2925633][URL]https://www.npr.org/2024/06/26/nx-s1-5003970/supreme-court-social-media-case[/URL]
6-3 decision for the government.
"Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said that the plaintiffs had failed to make the case that the companies' actions could be traced to pressure from the Biden administration. ".[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]The case arose from the Biden administrations efforts to address the spread of false information surrounding COVID-19 vaccines, foreign interference in elections and much more. Missouri and Louisiana, along with several individuals, argued that outreach by U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, the FBI, the White House and a key cybersecurity agency amounted to coercing social media platforms into censoring content.
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court disagreed.
Supporters of the ruling argued that at least in the interim the decision preserves the governments ability to engage with private companies on critical matters of public interest. For instance, they said that a contrary decision risked fueling the spread of voting misinformation, which undermines the ability of citizens to make informed decisions about elections, and proliferates false information about where and when to vote. [/QUOTE]This ruling really cuts into Trumpster / Wingers' ability to continue Mass Murdering as many Americans as they would love to Mass Murder with whatever loony, deadly BS message about Trump's Pandemic virus they can dig up from under a rock and steal elections as Trump's 34 criminal Election Fraud convictions exposed.
Trumpster / Wingers must be absolutely livid about it. Mass Murdering Americans and stealing elections is so much of what has dominated their plans, time and effort since 2016. Now they will have to look for some new workaround to accomplish those goals.
But in the meantime, thanks again for saving millions of American lives and keeping our elections free and fair, Joe.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2925595]We have all heard the incessant whining, whimpering, wild conspiracy theories and neverending lame excuses for why everyone who knows Trump, works with Trump, has ever seen, heard and observed Trump, as well as Trump himself, is certain he will totally fuck it up on style, technique and, most assuredly, on content vs "a feeble old man who can't walk, can't talk, can't put two words together, doesn't know who he is or where he is unless he chugs a quart of Mountain Dew moments before airtime. ".[/QUOTE]LOL! Good one Tooms. That may come to pass. But don't count your chickens before they're hatched! Trump is taking this seriously, and his team figured out the ideal way to prepare:
[B]Trump Preps For Debate Against Biden By Going to Nursing Home And Arguing With Dementia Patients[/B]
[URL]https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-preps-for-debate-against-biden-by-going-to-nursing-home-and-arguing-with-dementia-patients[/URL]
-
Handmaids Tale for sure...but can Paycheck Superhero save us?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925454][b]If SCOTUS[/b] wanted the ruling to stand, they did not have to hear the case. In fact, less than 1% of cases are heard by the Supreme Court. And the ruling was 9 to 0. It is kind of hard to call this some evil Republican SCOTUS plan if the Democratic judges were involved. [/QUOTE]
No [b]"If's"[/b] about it!
The corrupt 2/3 Conservative "upside-down, flag-flying" SCOTUS have always secretly and now blatantly openly, pushed for abortion bans. And now that they have it in the red states, their [b]Project 2025[/b] evil diabolical dictatorial plans and efforts now turn to towards, ways in which to make abortion, IVF and contraception, nationwide bans (possibly by way of the 1873 "zombie" Comstock Act). Which BTW, has always been their goal all along.
Right now in red states, there are descriptions of doctors performing, some-kind-of trauma inducing C-section (Caesarean section) on women, disguised as a non-abortion procedure, [i][b]"...to preserve the appearance of not doing an abortion..."[/b][/i], instead of prescribing Mifepristone, for fear criminal persecution, is just wild. Not too mention, the large number of doctors now leaving red states, because of abortion bans and the unjust criminal laws surrounding abortions in red states.
So by all means, Elvis 2008, if this kind of "abortion-hack" is acceptable for your girlfriends, mothers, sisters, daughters, wives, cousins, sisters-in-law...etc, then have your dystopian hellscape and Handmaids Tale, as the writer(s) in the article claim isn't happening.
[URL]https://pointofview.net/articles/dobbs-after-two-years/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925454]So where did you get this seriously stupid shit from? Was this from Joy Behar from the View? Or Whoopi Goldberg? You must be wearing knee pads from the times you fall on the floor screaming, "Preach Sisters!
LOL. Soy boy, so Taylor Swift is your GF now? Why else make the comparison? And do I have a hot GF or an incel? I know logical thinking is not your strength. Name call your way out of that one Soy Boy.
Wait, I recognize that whining. Spidy, are you Joy Behar? It has to be! That makes so much sense now.
Well, Joy, if anyone would know that, it would have to be you![/QUOTE]
In this episode "Paycheck Superhero", drags his economic "top-self" pussy earning "hot girlfriend" sidekick, to once again battle billion dollar economic earning power from the likes of Taylor Swift and Beyoncé? And now Joy Behar?
Is "Paycheck Superhero", weakening and is unable to take a little supervillain whining? As the supervillain found yet another weakness, in the INCEL misogynist "Paycheck Superhero"?
Is it only whining at certain frequencies (like $84 million gov't yachts and big gov't paychecks), that causes our thin-skinned superhero to grimace, wince and lose control?
Is whining just one of many cracks in "Paycheck Superhero"'s thin-skinned facade?
[u]Stay tuned to find out:[/u]
• If "Paycheck Superhero" will overcome and combat more supervillain whining?
• Will "Paycheck Superhero", get triggered into yet another "D-BAG" and Joy Behar tirade?
• What form and frequency will the whining resonate at, to the point where it again rattles our superhero and pierce the thinly veiled ego, much like his hero "daddy" Trump. Who coincidentally claims, [i]"I'm really rich..."[/i] while begging from his supporters for more and more money (...kkkk!)
• Will "Paycheck Superhero", once again call upon his economic pussy hustling "hot GF"?
• Will his [b]economic pussy hustling sidekick chick[/b], finally reveal herself as:[list] A. just another economic sidekick,
B. a damsel in economic distress, or
C. an economic INCEL/misogynist crutch, created to boost ISG viewership and approval?[/LIST]So while you thought this episode was exciting...[b]stay tuned[/b] for even more thrilling, economic pussy hustling, gov't paycheck crime fighting adventures of "Paycheck Superhero", courtesy of Elvis 2008.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925689]LOL! Good one Tooms. That may come to pass. But don't count your chickens before they're hatched! Trump is taking this seriously, and his team figured out the ideal way to prepare:
[B]Trump Preps For Debate Against Biden By Going to Nursing Home And Arguing With Dementia Patients[/B]
[URL]https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-preps-for-debate-against-biden-by-going-to-nursing-home-and-arguing-with-dementia-patients[/URL][/QUOTE]I'll bet Trump is so terrified of the risk it never occurred to him for one minute to defund and remove the Magic Mountain Dew Patrol Teams charged with making sure Biden doesn't sneak in an unmonitored quart before the debate.
BTW, I am already hearing infamously pro Repub Bothsider, former Meet The Press host Chuck Todd, making the rounds to lay the groundwork for the NBC / MSNBC networks to spin whatever loony shark, faucet, lather blather Trump uncontrollably launches into at Thursday's debate as a true and credible worry among the American Electorate, no giggling allowed, it must be taken seriously.
So, never fear, the Trump / Repub coddling and pro Repub Bothsiderism will be in full force during and after the debate. Any "mean" question directed at Trump by those CNN moderators will be cited for their "meanness" on the other networks every bit as much as if Sean Hannity had passed along Putin's scripted response to them.
-
Rubbish and BS back under a rock?
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2925633][URL]https://www.npr.org/2024/06/26/nx-s1-5003970/supreme-court-social-media-case[/URL]
6-3 decision for the government.
"Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said that the plaintiffs had failed to make the case that the companies' actions could be traced to pressure from the Biden administration. ".[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2925661]This ruling really cuts into Trumpster / Wingers' ability to continue Mass Murdering as many Americans as they would love to Mass Murder with [b]whatever loony, deadly BS message about Trump's Pandemic virus they can [u]dig up from under a rock[/u] and steal elections as Trump's 34 criminal Election Fraud convictions exposed.[/b]
Trumpster / Wingers must be absolutely livid about it. Mass Murdering Americans and stealing elections is so much of what has dominated their plans, time and effort since 2016. Now they will have to look for some new workaround to accomplish those goals.
But in the meantime, thanks again for saving millions of American lives and keeping our elections free and fair, Joe.[/QUOTE] Let's hope, that all that absolute rubbish and looney-tunes Trump's Pandemic virus conspiracy bullshit, finds it way back under a rock.
I live in hope...but I doubt it! As now they'll only want to [b]double-down[/b] and amplify the rubbish and bullshit!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925701]
Right now in red states, there are descriptions of doctors performing, some-kind-of trauma inducing C-section (Caesarean section) on women, disguised as a non-abortion procedure, [i][b]"...to preserve the appearance of not doing an abortion..."[/b][/i], instead of prescribing Mifepristone, for fear criminal persecution, is just wild. Not too mention, the large number of doctors now leaving red states, because of abortion bans and the unjust criminal laws surrounding abortions in red states.
So by all means, Elvis 2008, if this kind of "abortion-hack" is acceptable for your girlfriends, mothers, sisters, daughters, wives, cousins, sisters-in-law...etc, then have your dystopian hellscape and Handmaids Tale, as the writer(s) in the article claim isn't happening.[/QUOTE]OMG. The horror. The horror. Spidy / Joy, if my female loved one needed an abortion, why would I not buy a $100 plane ticket to Vegas and have an abortion on my loved one done there versus this "abortion hack" crap?
And now this WSJ article, Without telehealth, one in seven women would have to drive over 200 miles to the nearest provider. OMG. Say it ain't so. Shouldn't get an abortion be as easy as buying a candy bar? It is soooo hard to get an abortion. Wah, wah! Whine, Whine! Only 1,037,000 Americans got one last year.
Like I said, the days of hysteria are done. Roe v. Wade was overturned and women can get abortions if they want. It may be a little inconvenient but BFD. Why should this be so much easier to get than other medical procedures? I do not want it to be easier than this. Women need to think about this a little bit before they do it.
In the mean time, you Democratic douches have told doctors if they stare at a patient too long, they can get in trouble. Look at a penis too long, and your license is in jeopardy. Fondle it or breasts and your license will be taken for sure. But if you cut off a dick or pair of breasts, you are a progressive surgeon and can get paid tens of thousands. Shouldn't the new Democratic douche model be easier access to people getting their dicks chopped off? The average woman / man has to drive 400 miles to get their breasts cut off. Come on, Spidy / Joy. You need to take the right of gender affirmation surgery to SCOTUS.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925701]If "Paycheck Superhero" will overcome and combat more supervillain whining?
Will "Paycheck Superhero", get triggered into yet another "D-BAG" and Joy Behar tirade?[/QUOTE]Oh, Joy, did Whoopi steal your vibrator again? Well, I hope you got off after all that mental masturbation. No one wants to read that stupid MM shit.
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2925633][URL]https://www.npr.org/2024/06/26/nx-s1-5003970/supreme-court-social-media-case[/URL]
6-3 decision for the government.
"Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said that the plaintiffs had failed to make the case that the companies' actions could be traced to pressure from the Biden administration. ".[/QUOTE]Writing for a liberal-conservative coalition of six justices, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said that neither the five individuals nor the two states who sued the government had legal standing to be in court at all. She said they presented no proof to back up their claims that the government had pressured social media companies like Twitter and Facebook into restricting their speech. "Unfortunately," she said, the Fifth Circuit court of appeals "relied on factual findings that are "clearly erroneous. ".
In her opinion for the court majority, Justice Barrett said that at every turn, the alleged facts turned to dust, and that the plaintiffs had failed to trace past or potential future harm to anything done by officials at the White House, the CDC, the FBI, or a key cyber security agency.
Thanks for the article, CM, but I think you are reading this wrong. I am not sure I would have ruled any differently if the facts the state governments alleged turned to dust either. Matt Taibbi and other journalists were given the keys to Twitter, and I think this case was filed before that took place. Government did a good job covering its tracks and it took him and others a long time to unravel the whole censorship scheme. I doubt this case had those specific examples.
The facts are out on Covid if anyone looks for them. Democratic douches like Thailand Tooms do not want to understand what happened with Covid, and that is fine. The center at Stanford that was doing much of the censorship has been shut down. Assange has been let go. Biden is playing nice with censorship for now so why pile on? Thing is the Roberts Court has a history of ruling one for Dems and one for Republicans, and they are going to catch a lot of flak if they have to intervene in the New York criminal idiocy, and they will. SCOTUS is dedicated to the people choosing the president and not some NY jury. We not so recently had to endure the idiocy of Colorado Supreme Court and Maine's Secretary of State trying to keep Trump off state's ballots.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2925706]I'll bet Trump is so terrified of the risk it never occurred to him for one minute to defund and remove the Magic Mountain Dew Patrol Teams charged with making sure Biden doesn't sneak in an unmonitored quart before the debate.
BTW, I am already hearing infamously pro Repub Bothsider, former Meet The Press host Chuck Todd, making the rounds to lay the groundwork for the NBC / MSNBC networks to spin whatever loony shark, faucet, lather blather Trump uncontrollably launches into at Thursday's debate as a true and credible worry among the American Electorate, no giggling allowed, it must be taken seriously.
So, never fear, the Trump / Repub coddling and pro Repub Bothsiderism will be in full force during and after the debate. Any "mean" question directed at Trump by those CNN moderators will be cited for their "meanness" on the other networks every bit as much as if Sean Hannity had passed along Putin's scripted response to them.[/QUOTE]My Daddy used to say "if it looks like a Democrat, and it swims like a Democrat, and it quacks like a Democrat, it's a Democrat. " Well, Chuck Todd is a Democrat, no ifs, ands or buts. And MSNBC is Democratic Party Propaganda, 24/7. It's about as "Bothsider" as you or the Marquis de Sade.
"Mountain Dew Patrol Teams" are a great idea in theory. It's the logical beverage of choice for Biden, who may want to quickly (after the drug test) gas up on massive amounts of caffeine. Mountain Dew has more caffeine than tea and cola, and is easier to chug than Red Bull or coffee. Most people don't realize it's a potent stimulant. However, sadly Trump has no control over soft drink distributors. Or for that matter Partisan Democrat Doctors or the Mexican cartels that supply methamphetamines. As such I don't believe your idea is workable for Team Trump.
I'm not sure Biden would want to pursue the "Mountain Dew" option either. If he tanks up on an amount sufficient to improve his performance, he runs the risk of wetting his pants on stage. Undoubtedly though Partisan Democrats Jake Tapper and Dana Bash would lie and come up with an excuse for Joe. Maybe they'd falsely accuse Trump of pissing on his opponent's pant legs.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2925531]Shit Tiny! Every day I keep learning new things about myself. At my ripe age that can't be healthy.[/QUOTE]First Spidy and now you. I need to open a psychology practice to help Democrats with self awareness. Look at your posts in the Stupid Shit in Kyiv thread. And don't take it as an insult. Most of the people in this thread are neoconservatives. The only exceptions I can think of during the time I've posted here are JustTK, DramaFree, me, and possibly Elvis.
-
Time for your daddy to update that app
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925772]My Daddy used to say "if it looks like a Democrat, and it swims like a Democrat, and it quacks like a Democrat, it's a Democrat. " Well, Chuck Todd is a Democrat, no ifs, ands or buts. And MSNBC is Democratic Party Propaganda, 24/7. It's about as "Bothsider" as you or the Marquis de Sade.
"Mountain Dew Patrol Teams" are a great idea in theory. It's the logical beverage of choice for Biden, who may want to quickly (after the drug test) gas up on massive amounts of caffeine. Mountain Dew has more caffeine than tea and cola, and is easier to chug than Red Bull or coffee. Most people don't realize it's a potent stimulant. However, sadly Trump has no control over soft drink distributors. Or for that matter Partisan Democrat Doctors or the Mexican cartels that supply methamphetamines. As such I don't believe your idea is workable for Team Trump.
I'm not sure Biden would want to pursue the "Mountain Dew" option either. If he tanks up on an amount sufficient to improve his performance, he runs the risk of wetting his pants on stage. Undoubtedly though Partisan Democrats Jake Tapper and Dana Bash would lie and come up with an excuse for Joe. Maybe they'd falsely accuse Trump of pissing on his opponent's pant legs.[/QUOTE]In the modern pro Repub Mainstream Media world, it might be a good time for your Daddy to fine tune and update that concept:
"If it looks like a Democrat, and it swims like a Democrat, and it quacks like a Democrat, hire him to "Bothsides" as many Repubs Into election victory as possible so we can get plenrty of those "Once in 100 Years Repub Disaster Has Struck!" Headlines we crave. ".
If Trump squeaks out an EC win by less than 45,000 -78,000 votes sprinkled among 2-3 battleground states, which is MSM's dream "neck in neck" horse race business model for every general election, in fact is how many votes decided each of the previous two presidential elections and why they are under immense corporate pressure to be as pro Repub Bothsider as necessary to get it there and keep it there, I will be blaming Chuck Todd, Bill Maher and other MSM pundits as much as the foolish voters who fell for their methods for bringing us back to the next Great Repub Depression / Great Repub Recession and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction.
Those are great headlines and comedy monologue topics for MSM to attract more eyes and ears to their product. But they are really shifty outcomes for America. They will never get that if a Dem is in the White House and they know it.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925774]First Spidy and now you. I need to open a psychology practice to help Democrats with self awareness. Look at your posts in the Stupid Shit in Kyiv thread. And don't take it as an insult. Most of the people in this thread are neoconservatives. The only exceptions I can think of during the time I've posted here are JustTK, DramaFree, me, and possibly Elvis.[/QUOTE]Interesting. So my opposition to a state and a leader that started a full-blown, unprovoked war in Europe makes me a neoconservative? I wonder how you'd brand people who had strong reservations against Hitler back in the day.
P.S. I'm a left-leaning centrist, not Democrat, and I've said that before.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2925789]Interesting. So my opposition to a state and a leader that started a full-blown, unprovoked war in Europe makes me a neoconservative? I wonder how you'd brand people who had strong reservations against Hitler back in the day.
P.S. I'm a left-leaning centrist, not Democrat, and I've said that before.[/QUOTE]Again, please don't take it as an insult. As you correctly imply I'm a borderline pacifist who believes the USA generally shouldn't interfere in other countries' affairs. That is, it should be like Switzerland. And that's viewed more negatively by most Americans than "interventionist" or "neoconservative. " That's not the first time the Hitler analogy's been directed at me. A good friend, an ex-paratrooper, said something similar back in 2003 when I said Bush was dead wrong to go into Iraq.
Was the war in Ukraine unprovoked? Or was it the result of meddling and false promises by American and European governments dating back to 1990? Russia would be a member of NATO if our leaders and military and defense establishments hadn't wanted to preserve the status quo (hostility toward the Russians) at all costs.
What's the difference between a rational Democrat and a left-leaning centrist if he votes and lives in the USA? Who do you vote for? Those are rhetorical questions, I'm just engaging in my new hobby, amateur psychology to help Democrats become more self aware.
"Centrist" would imply that you'd be more likely to vote for, say, Kyrsten Sinema than Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. And Kyrsten's now an ex-Democrat. So maybe I was wrong. Hard to tell.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2925557]But it wasn't until Clinton's 2nd term as POTUS that I fully recovered and vowed never to vote for a non Democrat again. Ever. At any level.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2925788]Those are great headlines and comedy monologue topics for MSM to attract more eyes and ears to their product. But they are really shifty outcomes for America. They will never get that if a Dem is in the White House and they know it.[/QUOTE]I'm not sure what you mean by "shifty outcomes," but you're missing the big picture. A Democratic president usually isn't a bad outcome, PROVIDED Republicans control Congress, or at least one house. You missed that about Clinton's 2nd term, which was very positive. Without the Republicans, Clinton wouldn't have balanced the budget, reformed welfare or cut the capital gains tax. McCarthy and Republicans managed to claw back $1. 5 trillion of Democrats' profligate spending last year while Biden was president. A Democratic President and Republican Congress isn't a bad combination from the perspective of controlling the deficit. When you put one party in complete power, the bastards spend like drunken sailors. No offense to drunken sailors. And the Democrats are worse than Republicans.
Your MSM argument doesn't make a lot of sense. The corporations only care about profits. They're trying to sell commercials. And they'll sell more if they appeal to their viewership. MSNBC viewers don't want to hear the views of a bunch of Republicans so you're not going to see many Republicans or "both siders" on MSNBC. And vice versa for Fox. Your side has the advantage that journalists overwhelmingly identify as Democrats. I read a WSJ article the other day which went to great lengths to point out Trump's big lie, and had a chuckle when I thought about what you wrote here, that the WSJ NEWS reporters have a Republican bias. I'm shaking my head about your view on Chuck Todd as well. He got Ronna McDaniel fired, for goodness sake.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925889]I'm not sure what you mean by "shifty outcomes," but you're missing the big picture. A Democratic president usually isn't a bad outcome, PROVIDED Republicans control Congress, or at least one house. You missed that about Clinton's 2nd term, which was very positive. Without the Republicans, Clinton wouldn't have balanced the budget, reformed welfare or cut the capital gains tax. McCarthy and Republicans managed to claw back $1. 5 trillion of Democrats' profligate spending last year while Biden was president. A Democratic President and Republican Congress isn't a bad combination from the perspective of controlling the deficit. When you put one party in complete power, the bastards spend like drunken sailors. No offense to drunken sailors. And the Democrats are worse than Republicans.
Your MSM argument doesn't make a lot of sense. The corporations only care about profits. They're trying to sell commercials. And they'll sell more if they appeal to their viewership. MSNBC viewers don't want to hear the views of a bunch of Republicans so you're not going to see many Republicans or "both siders" on MSNBC. And vice versa for Fox. Your side has the advantage that journalists overwhelmingly identify as Democrats. I read a WSJ article the other day which went to great lengths to point out Trump's big lie, and had a chuckle when I thought about what you wrote here, that the WSJ NEWS reporters have a Republican bias. I'm shaking my head about your view on Chuck Todd as well. He got Ronna McDaniel fired, for goodness sake.[/QUOTE]"Shifty outcomes" was simply this site's auto-correct version of what I actually wrote, "sh*tty outcomes" that I did not catch until before I submitted the post. Since my posts are held for moderation, I don't see the posted version of them for several hours after I submit them and I can not edit them.
I should stick to accurately describing Repub potus economic results as "crap" or "crappy". The auto-correct feature here seems to be ok with that.
Nope. History shows a Dem president with a Dem Congress is just fine. Any encroachment by Repubs in Congess, however effectively the Dem president overrides their efforts to destroy the economy, as Clinton so successfully defeated Nude Grinbitch's efforts at every turn, is utterly beside the point. Clinton's economy would have been immeasurably better with a Dem-controlled Congress for all 8 years. As would Obama's.
The absolute worst combination is a Repub president with a Repub House and Senate. LOL. Do you actually think the Party that, when left to its own devices produced the absolute worst economic results in USA history and NONE of the many Great American legislative achievements I have cited several times here that Dems achieved when they controlled the WH and both Houses of Congress, would suddenly and miraculously behave themselves and not devote their entire time to creating the same historically crap results when a Dem is in the WH? LOL. They can only slow down or lessen the positive economic achievements of the Dem president, that's all.
Allowing Repubs any meaningful presence in Congress while the Dem in the WH is achieving great things for America only fools careless observers into thinking Repubs might not be so bad after all, even ok enough to be trusted in the WH again or maybe in the WH and controlling one or both Houses of Congress.
And once America has been lulled into that state of complacency, bingo, another colossal Repub economic disaster follows.
Too risky.
Better to just have a Dem in the WH and Dems controlling both Houses of Congress at all times. At most, America should have no more than 25-30% Repubs in each House of Congress and, it should go without saying, never a Repub in the WH.
You're still not getting how the typically pro Repub MSM Bothsiderism works. Of course many pundits on MSM walk, talk and swim like Democrats. They would come across as utterly ignorant numbskulls if they didn't. Leave that to Fux News.
But as an election approaches, that is when they trot out the pro Repub Bothsiderism in order to at least keep the horse race tight, sometimes so much the Repub wins. Their business model requires it. Worst case scenario (for America) is they keep the horse race so close the Repub actually wins. But that is also great for the MSM business model in that there will be plenty of horrific, bad news headlines for them to publish that will attract eyes and ears to their product.
Starting around the middle of Reagan's 1st term in office there is no way a Repub presidential candidate should have gotten more than 30% of the vote. By rights it should have been a blowout victory for the Dem every time since then. But it is really hard for MSM to get customers very excited over a race between a horse and a turtle. Consequently, MSM's ultimate election season mission is to elevate Repubs and their crap results and denigrate Dems and their far superior results in order to keep the race close.
LOL. Polls show a huge percentage of respondents thinking the Stock Market is down this year instead of repeatedly closing at All-Time Record Highs, that the Unemployment Rate is at a 50 year high instead of at or near 50 year lows, that Repubs are better at handling the economy than Dems, that Trump is better at defending democracy than Biden and a whole slew of utterly preposterous conclusions contrary to all available data and easily observable reality. That can not happen unless MSM is working overtime to put or allow that silliness to enter Americans' minds.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925774]First Spidy and now you. I need to open a psychology practice to help Democrats with self awareness. Look at your posts in the Stupid Shit in Kyiv thread. And don't take it as an insult. Most of the people in this thread are neoconservatives. The only exceptions I can think of during the time I've posted here are JustTK, DramaFree, me, and possibly Elvis.[/QUOTE]Maybe you can get through to them. I cannot. If you look at the three legs of the stool of the Republican Party, excessive defense, social conservatism / religious fundamentalism, and fiscal conservatism / libertarianism, I only am for the last set. My ideal politicians are Rand and Ron Paul.
What you call neoconservatives Tiny are really a group led by prowar Eastern European Jews. They swayed GW Bush after 9-11 and they got their wish of killing and torturing as many Arabs, and often innocent Arabs, as possible. Once I saw what this movement was, it made a mockery of GWB and his compassionate conservatism. Because of his civil rights abuses and shitty economic policies, I could not wait to see GWB go.
Thing is the necons just switched parties. All that Biden is doing is out of the GWB playbook. Karl Rove was fired for using prosecutors to hunt down political opposition. We are seeing massive expenditures once again for foreign wars. The tension that Trump brought down in the world has ramped up again. The conservative kooks have been replaced by liberal kooks.
9-11 was a tragedy and so was October 7. Thing is in both cases the response has not been to get those responsible but kill as many Arabs as possible. So the neocons have started waving their antisemitism flags now again while they are excessively killing Arabs, and it is not being bought this time. The truth is Biden is just as prowar as GWB was and with the exception of the LGBTQ stuff, Biden has more in common with GWB than an other recent president because they are both being led around by the nose by the necocons.
With you, Tiny, I think our biggest difference is you are not libertarian enough. You still buy the government narrative and bullshit when it destroyed our freedoms over a cold virus with a 0. 2% mortality. I think Fauci is as evil as Nazi doctors were and funded the creation of the Covid virus and caused the pandemic while you think he is a hero.
-
Oh no...it's "Dr. Hypo-Pathetical"?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925774]First Spidy and now you. I need to open a psychology practice to help Democrats with self awareness. Look at your posts in the Stupid Shit in Kyiv thread. And don't take it as an insult. Most of the people in this thread are neoconservatives. The only exceptions I can think of during the time I've posted here are JustTK, DramaFree, me, and possibly Elvis.[/QUOTE]
Now that's hilariously funny! You, Tiny 12, open up a "psychology practice", when you can barely get past your own oxymoron "Republican Libertarian" identity issues. (...kkkk!)
That opinionated nonsense, sounds more like an upcoming episode in "Hypo World", where "Hypo-pathetical Boy", doubles as the gay mild-mannered "Dr. Hypo-Pathetical", by day? (...kkkk!)
-
That $100 ticket, is now a $10K abortion ...but will "Paycheck Superhero" pay?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925731]OMG. The horror. The horror. Spidy / Joy, if my female loved one needed an abortion, why would I not buy a $100 plane ticket to Vegas and have an abortion on my loved one done there versus this "abortion hack" crap?
And now this WSJ article, Without telehealth, one in seven women would have to drive over 200 miles to the nearest provider. OMG. Say it ain't so. Shouldn't get an abortion be as easy as buying a candy bar? It is soooo hard to get an abortion. Wah, wah! Whine, Whine! Only 1,037,000 Americans got one last year.
Like I said, the days of hysteria are done. Roe v. Wade was overturned and women can get abortions if they want. It may be a little inconvenient but BFD. Why should this be so much easier to get than other medical procedures? I do not want it to be easier than this. Women need to think about this a little bit before they do it.[/QUOTE]
Not sure that "$100 plane ticket" is gonna do any good, if she decides to go out of state or decides to keep the pregnancy and (if God forbid) has complications or miscarriages in the 2nd or 3rd trimester.
[QUOTE][b]So let's get (like $10k) REAL, for just a moment now:[/b]
[u][b]Out of State:[/b][/u]
Gas, food, and a hotel: Americans seeking an abortion out of state already shell [b]out up to $10,000 ($10K)[/b] for the procedure. Experts warn that cost could rise. [URL]https://www.businessinsider.com/abortion-costs-roe-v-wade-out-of-state-supreme-court-2022-5?international=true&r=US&IR=T[/URL]
[u][b]In State (Blue State if your lucky):[/b][/u]
"An in-clinic abortion can cost up to around $800 in the first trimester, but its often less. The average cost of a first trimester in-clinic abortion at Planned Parenthood is about $600. The cost of a second trimester abortion at Planned Parenthood varies depending on how many weeks pregnant you are. The average ranges from about $715 earlier in the second trimester to $1,500-2,000 later in the second trimester."
"Your abortion may be free or low-cost with health insurance. But coverage for abortion varies depending on a lot of factors, like the laws where you live, what type of insurance you have, and the reason you need an abortion."
[URL]https://www.plannedparenthood.org/blog/how-much-does-it-cost-to-get-an-abortion[/URL]
[/QUOTE]
Since your idea of an out of state abortion, is a [b]"$100 plane ticket"[/b], nobody is expecting either an INCEL or misogynist and least of all you Elvis 2008, to fully understand what is playing out, in the struggle for abortion rights with American families and hospitals, around the country, post Roe v Wade.
It is especially in red states, where emergency rooms refused to treat pregnant women, leaving many to miscarry in a lobby restroom. Or another woman who learned that her fetus had no heartbeat at a Florida hospital, the day after a security guard turned her away from the facility. And in North Carolina, a woman gave birth in a car after an emergency room couldnt offer an ultrasound. The baby later died.
[i]Two years after Roe was struck down, the conversation has focused on the complications that can come with pregnancy and fertility, helping to drive more support for abortion rights.
...
Only now, two years after the Supreme Court eliminated the constitutional right to abortion, and just six months before the presidential election, has the slogan taken on the force of reality.
The public conversation about abortion has grown into one about the complexities of pregnancy and reproduction, as the consequences of bans have played out in the news. The question is no longer just whether you can get an abortion, but also, Can you get one if pregnancy complications put you in septic shock? Can you find an obstetrician when so many are leaving states with bans? If you miscarry, will the hospital send you home to bleed? Can you and your partner do in vitro fertilization?
Abortion Debate Shifts as Election Nears: Now Its About Pregnancy June 24, 2024
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/24/us/politics/abortion-roe-wade-pregnancy.html[/URL][/i]
[b][u]In this episode of "Paycheck Superhero":[/u][/b]
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925731]In the mean time, you Democratic douches have told doctors if they stare at a patient too long, they can get in trouble. Look at a penis too long, and your license is in jeopardy. Fondle it or breasts and your license will be taken for sure. But if you cut off a dick or pair of breasts, you are a progressive surgeon and can get paid tens of thousands. Shouldn't the new Democratic douche model be easier access to people getting their dicks chopped off? The average woman / man has to drive 400 miles to get their breasts cut off. Come on, Spidy / Joy. You need to take the right of gender affirmation surgery to SCOTUS.
Oh, Joy, did Whoopi steal your vibrator again? Well, I hope you got off after all that mental masturbation. No one wants to read that stupid MM shit.[/QUOTE]
It looks like the supervillain, has cracked that "nut" and found, one of many in "Paycheck Superhero"'s weaknesses. [b]One of them is indeed "whining"!!! [/b]
It would seem, the more supervillains whine, the angrier the outbursts and tirades get. {...Here's hoping he doesn't get angry, large and green at the same time...kkkk!}
[u]Stay Tuned to find out:[/u]
• Will our "Paycheck Superhero", really live up to his superhero status and shell-out the $10K big paycheck, required for an out of state abortion, for his economic pussy hustling sidekick chick?
• Will the supervillains be able to exploit this weakness before "Paycheck Superhero" can get help?
• Will "Paycheck Superhero" overcome his mental and emotional psychological affliction to whining? And Joy Behar?
• Will "Paycheck Superhero" write a big-fat paycheck, to see [b]his gay buddy "Dr. Hypo-Pathetical"[/b], at his [b]newly formed "psychology practice"[/b] over in "Hypo World"?
• What (if any) superhero meds will "Dr. Hypo-Pathetical" prescribe? And what's the cure for "Paycheck Superhero"'s Joy Behar fixation?
• Will "Dr. Hypo-Pathetical", he tell his gay superhero pal (as he tells all his patients), "...it's all in your head. You're not who you think you are. [b]You're really just a neoconservative![/b]" (...kkkk!)
Stay Tuned...
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925949]Not sure that "$100 plane ticket" is gonna do any good, if she decides to go out of state or decides to keep the pregnancy[/QUOTE]Uh, if she keeps the kid, she does not need a $100 plane ticket. It sounds like you have given up the abortion fight.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925949]It is especially in red states, where emergency rooms refused to treat pregnant women, leaving many to miscarry in a lobby restroom.[/QUOTE]Okay, so we are talking miscarriages now and not planned abortions. I guess blue states do not have women with miscarriages then. What is the cure for miscarriages Spidy / Joy? Because I have not heard of any cures.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925949]Or another woman who learned that her fetus had no heartbeat at a Florida hospital, the day after a security guard turned her away from the facility. And in North Carolina, a woman gave birth in a car after an emergency room couldnt offer an ultrasound. The baby later died.[/QUOTE]So now the diagnostic test of ultrasound saves lives? Cough, cough. Uh okay. Thank God you can buy your own ultrasound on Groupon for a whopping $9. 99. Here is a deluxe model going for $39.99, [URL]https://www.fetaldoppler.net/fd-200b.html[/URL].
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925949]The public conversation about abortion has grown into one about the complexities of pregnancy and reproduction, as the consequences of bans have played out in the news.[/QUOTE]The banned procedure that over a million Americans had last year. Gee, lie much?
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925949]Can you get one if pregnancy complications put you in septic shock? Can you find an obstetrician when so many are leaving states with bans? If you miscarry, will the hospital send you home to bleed? Can you and your partner do in vitro fertilization?[/QUOTE]IVF? LOL. You got to be fucking kidding me. Who is for banning that? Or treating septic shock?
In fact, the only thing I see in the abortion universe is when a woman has a miscarriage and does not fully expel the fetus. That can be a bloody mess, and the doctor would have to scrape the uterus to get out all that fetal tissue to stop the bleeding. Thing is that is the same procedure as performing an abortion. The concept that a woman bleeding to death is not being treated is fucking hysterical.
On the flip side, maybe you are taking about doctors who break the law and find a nurse who will on purpose not found a fetal heart beat, claim a miscarriage is ongoing, and perform not an evacuation of a miscarriage, but a full on live abortion and bill for it in a red state that bans abortion? Yeah, fuck that greedy piece of shit. Where is your "rule of law" bullshit now?
[QUOTE=Spidy;2925949]Will "Dr. Hypo-Pathetical", he tell his gay superhero pal (as he tells all his patients), "...it's all in your head. You're not who you think you are. You're really just a neoconservative! (...kkkk!)
Stay Tuned...[/QUOTE]Joy, Joy, Joy, we talked about this. I am begging you to get your lithium level checked.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2925886]Again, please don't take it as an insult. As you correctly imply I'm a borderline pacifist who believes the USA generally shouldn't interfere in other countries' affairs. That is, it should be like Switzerland. And that's viewed more negatively by most Americans than "interventionist" or "neoconservative. " That's not the first time the Hitler analogy's been directed at me. A good friend, an ex-paratrooper, said something similar back in 2003 when I said Bush was dead wrong to go into Iraq.
Was the war in Ukraine unprovoked? Or was it the result of meddling and false promises by American and European governments dating back to 1990? Russia would be a member of NATO if our leaders and military and defense establishments hadn't wanted to preserve the status quo (hostility toward the Russians) at all costs.
What's the difference between a rational Democrat and a left-leaning centrist if he votes and lives in the USA? Who do you vote for? Those are rhetorical questions, I'm just engaging in my new hobby, amateur psychology to help Democrats become more self aware.
"Centrist" would imply that you'd be more likely to vote for, say, Kyrsten Sinema than Alexandria Ocasio Cortez. And Kyrsten's now an ex-Democrat. So maybe I was wrong. Hard to tell.[/QUOTE]Well, you're almost right. Not for Sinema, because I don't believe she's honest, but I wouldn't vote for AOC or any of them squad be*ches ever. I wouldn't vote for someone like Menendez who I might agree with politically (mostly), but I won't vote for a crook.
Being an independent centrist means I don't follow party lines and hate extremes both on the right and the left. It also means that I somewhat immune to political bullshit on both sides. Hope that helps.
If you honesty believe that Russia was wronged and Putin was [B]legitimately[/B] provoked by the West, you need to direct your psychoanalysis toward your inner self. Do you believe that a newly-formed nation must remain in the orbit of its former colonizer, or does it have the right to chose its own destiny? And if it wasn't Russia, but someone smaller, like Serbia -- would you feel the same way?
As for Russia being the part of Nato, that's beyond funny man. Why do you think all former USSR clients ran -- not walk -- toward Nato in the first place?
-
That's What I'm Talking about!!
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2918041]Calling it Now Senile Fake pres Shit Stained Joe will not show up in June debate or will be so incomprehensible and they shall use this incident to replace him with the scumbag newsome.[/QUOTE]So Will The scumbag Newsome be the replacement?? Or Kamala?
-
Abortion and Miscarriages can be fatal! But being stupid, not so much...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925966]Uh, if she keeps the kid, she does not need a $100 plane ticket. It sounds like you have given up the abortion fight. [/QUOTE]
That's right, she won't need $100, [b]she'll need $10K[/b] [i](according to the article, [b]here:[/b] [URL]https://www.businessinsider.com/abortion-costs-roe-v-wade-out-of-state-supreme-court-2022-5?international=true&r=US&IR=T[/URL])[/i] , especially if (God forbid) she has complications or miscarriages in the 2nd or 3rd trimester, in a red state.
Here's is a list of other "planned" pregnancy complications, Elvis 2008 and "Economic Pussy Sidekick Chick", might want to "plan" for:
• Amniotic Fluid Complications
• Bleeding
• Ectopic Pregnancy
• Placental Complications
• Fetal Loss (or Miscarriage)
• Preeclampsia or Eclampsia
Just hope she can find a good OBGYN (or competent doctor), in a red state, when the time comes. Cause the good ones are getting the fuck outta Dodge!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925966]Okay, so we are talking miscarriages now and not planned abortions. I guess blue states do not have women with miscarriages then. What is the cure for miscarriages Spidy / Joy? Because I have not heard of any cures. [/QUOTE] Is there a [u]cure[/u] for [b]stupid[/b] and [b]ignorance?[/b] No, but like miscarriages, they can be treated with the right kind of help! (hint, hint). But in your case, be thankful that, stupid and ignorance isn't necessarily fatal.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925966]So now the diagnostic test of ultrasound saves lives? Cough, cough. Uh okay. Thank God you can buy your own ultrasound on Groupon for a whopping $9. 99. Here is a deluxe model going for $39.99, [URL]https://www.fetaldoppler.net/fd-200b.html[/URL]. [/QUOTE]That should be good news for "Economic Pussy Sidekick Chick"
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925966]The banned procedure that over a million Americans had last year. Gee, lie much?
IVF? LOL. You got to be fucking kidding me. Who is for banning that? Or treating septic shock?[/QUOTE]
Like I said, nobody is expecting either an INCEL, misogynist or an Elvis 2008, to fully understand pregnancies. As if miscarriages is something families "plan" to have, let alone the myriad of complications that can occur during a pregnancy. So you may as well quit trying to explain yourself!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925966]In fact, the only thing I see in the abortion universe is when a woman has a miscarriage and does not fully expel the fetus. That can be a bloody mess, and the doctor would have to scrape the uterus to get out all that fetal tissue to stop the bleeding. Thing is that is the same procedure as performing an abortion. The concept that a woman bleeding to death is not being treated is fucking hysterical.
On the flip side, maybe you are taking about doctors who break the law and find a nurse who will on purpose not found a fetal heart beat, claim a miscarriage is ongoing, and perform not an evacuation of a miscarriage, but a full on live abortion and bill for it in a red state that bans abortion? Yeah, fuck that greedy piece of shit. Where is your "rule of law" bullshit now?[/QUOTE]
Sigh!...There's just no accounting for, or explaining the twisted logic of an INCEL, misogynist or that of an Elvis 2008, especially when they declare themselves, the arbiters of women's bodies and health.
[b]Supreme Court officially allows emergency abortions in Idaho, for now, June 27, 2024 [/b]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/06/27/supreme-court-abortion-emergency-room-hospital-impact/[/URL]
I know [b]women's issues[/b] can be a bit of a [b]blind-spot for INCELS[/b], misogynists and Elvis 2008, but take a good look, doctors are fleeing Idaho, Texas emergency rooms and OBGYN's are closing down all over red states, in fear of unjust abortion laws. Women, in red states, should take solace, that SCOTUS just restored emergency room abortion rights...well at least for now.
But I'm sure, as a Repub and a law abiding Texan, who loves to follow The Rule of Law, you'd be the first in line to turn-in said "hot GF", for the $10K abortion bounty, 'cause that's how Repubs like 2x abortion deniers like Herschel Walker roll, right?
[b][u]In this episode of "Paycheck Superhero":[/u][/b]
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2925966]Joy, Joy, Joy, we talked about this. [b]I am begging you[/b] to get your lithium level checked.[/QUOTE]
It seems "Paycheck Superhero", is coming around to the realization, that the originator of the series "Paycheck Superhero", is one of his own making and based on the originator's alter-ego?
It seems "Paycheck Superhero", is struggling between The Rule of Law and his bank checking account. As he contemplates the $10K abortion bounty and turning-in his econo-pussy sidekick.
But why is "Paycheck Superhero" begging? (It's so undignified!) Did the supervillain's whining finally, get to the superhero? Or was it his Joy Behar fixation?
[u]Stay Tuned to find out:[/u]
• Will "Paycheck Superhero", again seek help from his gay buddy "Dr. Hypo-Pathetical", over in "Hypo World"?
• Will "Dr. Hypo-Pathetical", have to again remind "Paycheck Superhero" that "...it just all in your head, son"
• Will "Economic Pussy Sidekick Chick", realize an abortion can take upwards of $10K and not just the $100 plane ticket, "Paycheck Superhero" is lying to her about?
Stay Tuned...
-
June Debate
Both candidates were absolutely awful and petty, even arguing over their golf handicaps! Really? Trump dodged question after question and told lie after lie after lie! And Biden was low energy with a hoarse voice and often unable to keep his train of thought. They said he had a bad cold (after the fact), and I'll give him that, but definitely not a good look. Both candidates sucked, and it's hard for me to say that anybody "won". At the end of the day, for me like most people, it's not going to make a difference. I'm a Democrat. I vote for Democratic candidates. When it's for President, my vote isn't just about the one person, but everybody else who they will bring with them too. Joe Biden may belong in an old folks home, but Chump belongs in jail making him (and his not ready for prime time players) the far worse choice in my mind. Biden can stand up there and drool for all I care. [B]Never Trump[/B]!
-
Fake, no. OLLLDDDD, yes.
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2926010]So Will The scumbag Newsome be the replacement?? Or Kamala?[/QUOTE]Previous debate between these two, Biden looked good. Last night, he was terrible. People get old and he looked more like 101, and not 81.
Calling him a fake president though is nonsense. He delivered a lot of what he said from his last election campaign. You can certainly disagree with those policies, but he got through a lot of legislations.
I stand corrected though, that I thought he would be better than he's shown last night.
-
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2926010]So Will The scumbag Newsome be the replacement?? Or Kamala?[/QUOTE]Woodman, I honestly thought Biden was not that bad. Thing is I have seen him so much worse than this. , but much of America had not. Well, last night, they did. Thing is the whole bird brained idea of debating Trump was Biden's decision, and I am sure he could not be talked out of it.
To me, the most telling story came when it came to Trump and his golf game. You can catch videos of him playing, and he is really good. Sportswriter Rick Reilly caddied for Trump and wrote about it in a book Who is your Caddy? Reilly talked about Trump using his "useful hyperbole" AKA being the bullshit artist Trump can be. Trump even told Reilly that Reilly would be sick of him after a few days, and Reilly was. LOL. Thing is Reilly also practically pleaded with people not to just buy into the bullshit and reject Trump but listed all of the things Trump had accomplished in his life including being a great golfer. In other words, buried in that bullshit is some really great stuff.
I expected the lying about the economy and the exaggeration / lying from both of them. When it came to the golf thing and Biden said he had a 6 and then 8 handicap, you could see Trump rolling his eyes. He even said it was Biden's worst lie of the night, and to me, it was the most insightful. It was like a 5 year old lying, and Trump told Biden, "Let's not act like children. " This was an exchange of a rational human being and a man who belonged in assisted living filled with delusion. The question was about physical fitness for office, and Biden absolutely lied his ass off when it came to being fit.
So Biden may be demented, but he is a demented bully, and there is no way in hell he is getting out. He still thinks he can beat Trump. He probably thinks he won the debate, and anybody who tries to take him out is going to have an FBI investigation or IRS tax audit.
If Biden tried to tee off, I swear he would miss the ball. At best, he would hit it 4 yards. I do not think he is even physically capable of raising s club above his head. But you know if he tried it and made an ass of himself, he would be yelling at people looking for something or someone to blame.
So you have the idiotic open border policy and its attempt to bring in illegals to vote for him being put up in luxury hotels. You have the stupid notion of criminally prosecuting your opposition, and now you had the incredibly idiotic idea of debating Trump. Well, that is your guy Dems. And guess what? You are fucking stuck with him because he ain't going anywhere.
-
Comeback
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2926075]Previous debate between these two, Biden looked good. Last night, he was terrible. People get old and he looked more like 101, and not 81.
Calling him a fake president though is nonsense. He delivered a lot of what he said from his last election campaign. You can certainly disagree with those policies, but he got through a lot of legislations.
I stand corrected though, that I thought he would be better than he's shown last night.[/QUOTE]Remember that Obama lost his first debate against Romney too but came back to win. What goes down in a debate does not dictate the outcome of an election. It's one of many pieces. I have no doubt that Biden will do much better in September. But again, at the end of the day, I don't think most minds are going to be swayed either way. It's just not a good match up, and I wish there were better choices on both sides. But, it is what it is, and people are going to vote along party lines. It's going to be close, and I say whoever wins Pennsylvania (I have Biden), Wisconsin (I have Biden) [B]and[/B] Michigan (too close to call) takes the election.
-
This is what I heard, clear as a bell
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2926075]Previous debate between these two, Biden looked good. Last night, he was terrible. People get old and he looked more like 101, and not 81.
Calling him a fake president though is nonsense. He delivered a lot of what he said from his last election campaign. You can certainly disagree with those policies, but he got through a lot of legislations.
I stand corrected though, that I thought he would be better than he's shown last night.[/QUOTE]For anyone interested in substance in a debate, right off the top of my head, this is what I heard in those 90 minutes:
1. Biden will veto any ChristoFacist Repub attempt to outlaw Sex For Pleasure / a National Abortion Ban.
2. Biden will work to make Roe v Wade the law of the land.
3. Biden will raise taxes slightly on the wealthy (likely on greater then $400,000 in taxable income) to keep Social Security solvent for decades with no other changes necessary.
4. Biden will again reduce child / family poverty by extending the Child Tax Credit.
5. Biden will veto any attempt to abolish the Affordable Care Act.
6. Biden will continue to cut costs for many necessary, life-saving drugs.
7. Trump will do none of the above.
8. Trump told 1-2 lies in virtually every sentence he uttered.
9. Trump had to he chased around the horn by the moderators, repeatedly asking the same question for him to at least say something remotely related to the question asked.
10. Trump did not reveal this, Biden did, but Trump plans to raise taxes on everyone in America by slapping tariffs on practically everything.
11. Trump apparently does not know what a tariff is or who pays them. He still thinks China paid his tariffs.
12. Sixteen Nobel Prize Economists have explained that Trump plan will most assuredly trigger a huge Repub Recession and spike up inflation beyond his own Trump's Pandemic Inflation.
13. Trump mentioned no other plan if he gets a second term.
-
A little perspective
You think only 33% saying Biden won is bad?
[B]Majority of debate watchers say Trump won debate over Biden: CNN Poll.
June 28, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.business-standard.com/world-news/majority-of-debate-watchers-say-trump-won-debate-over-biden-cnn-poll-124062800222_1.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]
Sixty-seven per cent to [b]33 per cent[/b] of the registered debate watchers said that Trump turned in a better performance, according to a CNN flash poll conducted by SSRS.[/QUOTE]How about this?
[B]Romneys Strong Debate Performance Erases Obamas Lead.
GOP Challenger Viewed as Candidate with New Ideas.
Oct. 8, 2012[/B]
[URL]https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2012/10/08/romneys-strong-debate-performance-erases-obamas-lead/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Fully 66% of registered voters say Romney did the better job in last Wednesdays debate, compared with just [b]20%[/b] who say Obama did better.[/QUOTE]And, of course, Obama went on to win re-election over Romney.
Was there Dem panic back in Oct. 2012? Yep.
Oh, and Romney wasn't a 34 time felon convicted of conspiracy to commit Election Fraud in order to steal a presidential election, found liable for rape, did not incite a violent mob of cop-killing Insurrectionists to storm the Capitol, stalk top elected officials for their public execution, overturn a free and fair election and overthrow American democracy and so on while he sat on his butt and did nothing except enjoy the show for 3+ hours and did not lie 1-2 times in every sentence he uttered at that debate.
Perhaps typically pro Repub Mainstream Media will take a moment or two someday to recall that.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2926021]That's right, she won't need $100, [b]she'll need $10K[/b] [i](according to the article, [b]here:[/b] [URL]https://www.businessinsider.com/abortion-costs-roe-v-wade-out-of-state-supreme-court-2022-5?international=true&r=US&IR=T[/URL])[/i] , especially if (God forbid) she has complications or miscarriages in the 2nd or 3rd trimester, in a red state.
Here's is a list of other "planned" pregnancy complications, Elvis 2008 and "Economic Pussy Sidekick Chick", might want to "plan" for:
Amniotic Fluid Complications
Bleeding
Ectopic Pregnancy
Placental Complications
Fetal Loss (or Miscarriage)
Preeclampsia or Eclampsia
Just hope she can find a good OBGYN (or competent doctor), in a red state, when the time comes. Cause the good ones are getting the fuck outta Dodge![/QUOTE]And here you go again. You know NOTHING about medicine. First off, you have lied and lost on abortion. Second, you make this completely idiotic comment that Obs are all Democratic loving douches like yourself.
Quite frankly, the OB field is filled with losers who could not get into orthopedics, men who want to control women at their most vulnerable, and female lesbians looking to score. Thank God they are in that field because women in Africa somehow make it by with childbirth and unlike orthopedists who often are operating on seniors, OB / Gyns are operating on young women and have a large margin for error because their patients are so healthy. They have a reputation for being the WORST surgeons there are.
And with regards to medicine and not surgery, their training is pure shit. They do little if any training in intensive medicine. They are not medicine people but surgeons and their prescribing habits, which are often horrible, reflect that. Again, because their patients are so healthy they get away with prescribing stupidly.
The exceptions to the rule are the positive doctors who look at being an OB as bringing life into the world. They thrive on the joy of child birth and are usually very religious. They often are prominent members in their church and are known and loved within their communities. And this may shock you, but these doctors fucking HATE abortion. They do not do it and do not want to. But if a member of their congregation has an incomplete miscarriage they would not treat it? Are you out of your fucking mind?
And then your is your idiotic contention that right wing religious groups do not want good prenatal care and IVF? Again, you are out of your fucking mind.
Lastly, the doctors making a living on abortion are by and large the biggest scumbags in medicine. Yeah, doing abortions may be legal but it does not means those doctors are respected. And those are the people you are insisting on being good doctors? Again, you know nothing. You just parade around pretending to be prowoman while mirroring feminazi talking points.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2926049]Both candidates were absolutely awful and petty, even arguing over their golf handicaps! Really? Trump dodged question after question and told lie after lie after lie! And Biden was low energy with a hoarse voice and often unable to keep his train of thought. They said he had a bad cold (after the fact), and I'll give him that, but definitely not a good look. Both candidates sucked, and it's hard for me to say that anybody "won".[/QUOTE]LOL. You are blind. Look at what Dems are saying. The New York Times op-ed page was an unbroken mass of calls for Biden to step down. "President Biden, I've Seen Enough," declared Nicholas Kristof. "Joe Biden Is a Good Man and a Good President. He Must Bow Out of the Race," agreed Thomas Friedman. "Biden Cannot Go on Like This," was Frank Bruni's offering. The Times "Matter of Opinion" podcast saw Ross Douthat, Michelle Cottle, and Ezra Klein unite under an "I Don't Think Joe Biden should be running" headline. Calling Biden "ancient," Michelle Goldberg added, "There will now be a new chorus of cries for him to drop out, and I'll be joining it. ".
It was the same thing all over. The Atlantic headlines were "Time to Go, Joe" by Mark Leibovich, and "Dropping Out is Joe Biden's Most Patriotic Option" by Jerusalem Demsas. At the Washington Post Ramesh Ponnuru's construction, which will be popular, was, "Trump is too dangerous for Democrats to stick with Biden. ".
[QUOTE=TheCane;2926049]At the end of the day, for me like most people, it's not going to make a difference. I'm a Democrat. I vote for Democratic candidates.[/QUOTE]IOW, you do not vote for your candidate. You just go with whomever the party bigwigs select, kind of like China or Russia.
[QUOTE=TheCane;2926049]Joe Biden may belong in an old folks home, but Chump belongs in jail making him (and his not ready for prime time players) the far worse choice in my mind. Biden can stand up there and drool for all I care. [B]Never Trump[/B]![/QUOTE]This is the best description of a Democratic douche I have ever heard. You do not give a damn if a person is mentally competent to do the job of being a president. You literally want a system like Russia or China with one party rule where the head of the party, even if he is incompetent, rules. You douches talk about saving Democracy when you would not know what Democracy is if it bit you in the ass.
-
Should Trump have bowed out after his 34 Felony Convictions?
Biden is up 1 point in this poll vs his pre debate rating in it.
I get this is what 60% "want". But even if they don't get that, there is no indication (yet) that they will not still vote for him over Trump.
[B]60% of voters want Biden replaced as candidate after debate, poll says.[/B]
[URL]https://www.axios.com/2024/06/29/biden-democrat-candidate-replacement-poll[/URL]
[QUOTE]When the survey asked respondents to choose between Biden and former President Trump, [b]45% chose the president and 44% chose the former commander-in-chief.[/b]
The results were similar to those from a poll following Trump's criminal conviction on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records linked to a $130,000 hush money payment.
[B]That shows "President Joe Biden has lost no immediate ground to Trump," per Morning Consult's findings.[/b][/QUOTE]Oh, Fun Fact: it turns out not many people watched that debate:
[B]TV Ratings: Biden-Trump Debate Draws 51M Viewers, Way Below 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/biden-trump-first-2024-debate-tv-ratings-1235934892/[/URL]
And it is likely very few of them were undecideds anyway since they are not known to be so into politics that they bother to watch debates.
Sure, if they didn't watch even a minute of the debate, they will certainly be exposed to plenty of sound bite ads taken from that debate.
And on that point, I could easily identify a dozen sound bites from that debate of Biden touting a planned policy for his 2nd term that would be very popular with voters.
I can not recall even one from Trump.
However, there are many, many easy sound bite lifts from that debate of Trump proclaiming that "America SUCKS"!
Just sayin'.
-
Russia and China are with you all the way!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2926116]LOL. You are blind. Look at what Dems are saying. The New York Times op-ed page was an unbroken mass of calls for Biden to step down. "President Biden, I've Seen Enough," declared Nicholas Kristof. "Joe Biden Is a Good Man and a Good President. He Must Bow Out of the Race," agreed Thomas Friedman. "Biden Cannot Go on Like This," was Frank Bruni's offering. The Times "Matter of Opinion" podcast saw Ross Douthat, Michelle Cottle, and Ezra Klein unite under an "I Don't Think Joe Biden should be running" headline. Calling Biden "ancient," Michelle Goldberg added, "There will now be a new chorus of cries for him to drop out, and I'll be joining it. ".
It was the same thing all over. The Atlantic headlines were "Time to Go, Joe" by Mark Leibovich, and "Dropping Out is Joe Biden's Most Patriotic Option" by Jerusalem Demsas. At the Washington Post Ramesh Ponnuru's construction, which will be popular, was, "Trump is too dangerous for Democrats to stick with Biden. ".
IOW, you do not vote for your candidate. You just go with whomever the party bigwigs select, kind of like China or Russia.
This is the best description of a Democratic douche I have ever heard. You do not give a damn if a person is mentally competent to do the job of being a president. You literally want a system like Russia or China with one party rule where the head of the party, even if he is incompetent, rules. You douches talk about saving Democracy when you would not know what Democracy is if it bit you in the ass.[/QUOTE]I assure you neither the authoritarian system in Russia nor the authoritarian system in China have the least bit of affinity with an American who intelligently chooses to only vote for candidates from the one Party that has produced the best results in America and none of the Great Repub Disasters rather than any person willing to vote for a member of the Party that has led directly to every Great American Economic Disaster of the past 100 years AND the corrupt justices bent on eliminating American freedom and rights instead of protecting and expanding them.
You do know that the very countries' evil systems you cited are not now and never have helped Biden or the Dem Party win elections but do actively hack, spin and help Trump and the Repub Party, right?
If, as you appear to be saying, you really are against what evil Russia and evil China want to spread around the globe you too would never vote for THEIR beloved Repub Party candidates and only vote for Dems.
That's right. I have actually done more to prevent the spread of Russia / China-style authoritarian rule in America all the way here in Thailand with my mail-in ballots than you have with any vote for any Repub at any time and especially for Donald Trump in your home town in America.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2926116]LOL. You are blind. Look at what Dems are saying. The New York Times op-ed page was an unbroken mass of calls for Biden to step down. "President Biden, I've Seen Enough," declared Nicholas Kristof. "Joe Biden Is a Good Man and a Good President. He Must Bow Out of the Race," agreed Thomas Friedman. "Biden Cannot Go on Like This," was Frank Bruni's offering. The Times "Matter of Opinion" podcast saw Ross Douthat, Michelle Cottle, and Ezra Klein unite under an "I Don't Think Joe Biden should be running" headline. Calling Biden "ancient," Michelle Goldberg added, "There will now be a new chorus of cries for him to drop out, and I'll be joining it. ".
It was the same thing all over. The Atlantic headlines were "Time to Go, Joe" by Mark Leibovich, and "Dropping Out is Joe Biden's Most Patriotic Option" by Jerusalem Demsas. At the Washington Post Ramesh Ponnuru's construction, which will be popular, was, "Trump is too dangerous for Democrats to stick with Biden. ".
IOW, you do not vote for your candidate. You just go with whomever the party bigwigs select, kind of like China or Russia.
This is the best description of a Democratic douche I have ever heard. You do not give a damn if a person is mentally competent to do the job of being a president. You literally want a system like Russia or China with one party rule where the head of the party, even if he is incompetent, rules. You douches talk about saving Democracy when you would not know what Democracy is if it bit you in the ass.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/opinion/biden-election-debate-trump.html[/URL]
-
Touche!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2926116]LOL. You are blind. Look at what Dems are saying. The New York Times op-ed page was an unbroken mass of calls for Biden to step down. "President Biden, I've Seen Enough," declared Nicholas Kristof. "Joe Biden Is a Good Man and a Good President. He Must Bow Out of the Race," agreed Thomas Friedman. "Biden Cannot Go on Like This," was Frank Bruni's offering. The Times "Matter of Opinion" podcast saw Ross Douthat, Michelle Cottle, and Ezra Klein unite under an "I Don't Think Joe Biden should be running" headline. Calling Biden "ancient," Michelle Goldberg added, "There will now be a new chorus of cries for him to drop out, and I'll be joining it. ".
It was the same thing all over. The Atlantic headlines were "Time to Go, Joe" by Mark Leibovich, and "Dropping Out is Joe Biden's Most Patriotic Option" by Jerusalem Demsas. At the Washington Post Ramesh Ponnuru's construction, which will be popular, was, "Trump is too dangerous for Democrats to stick with Biden. ".
IOW, you do not vote for your candidate. You just go with whomever the party bigwigs select, kind of like China or Russia.
This is the best description of a Democratic douche I have ever heard. You do not give a damn if a person is mentally competent to do the job of being a president. You literally want a system like Russia or China with one party rule where the head of the party, even if he is incompetent, rules. You douches talk about saving Democracy when you would not know what Democracy is if it bit you in the ass.[/QUOTE]No, you see I make up my own mind. The New York Times, FOX News or whatever doesn't tell me what to do. And can you read and comprehend? I do vote for my candidate [B]plus[/B] the people that I expect they will bring along with them as a part of their administration. And talk about being blind. It's a [B]two party system[/B] that we have and I don't do anything in it that you don't. And that's vote for which of the two parties that routinely best represents me and my interests. That's no doubt the Democratic Party and not the Repukeian party.
So you go ahead and vote for your unqualified, dictatorial but mentally competent incompetent felon and "all the best people" he would bring with him. And I'm going to vote for the one whose people stand for democracy, the rule of law, and the peaceful transfer of power. Touche douche! Four more years of Democratic rule over cowardly, morally bankrupt, tyrannical Repukeians who've proven they can't govern and who won't stop at denying women the right to choose.
You see, now they want to make the Bible the centerpiece of education in America too violating yet another foundation of this country's basic founding. That would be the separation of church and state. We may as well be living in some corrupt theocracy like Afghanistan or Iran! The only ones with Trump Derangement Syndrome are dolts just like you who would jump off a cliff for Chump if he asked you too. Just like the followers of other crooks like Hitler or Tojo. Trump says himself he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and ignorant sheep followers like you wouldn't care. And he knows it and says it out loud. You're too ignorant to realize he's not looking out for you. He's out for himself, and that's not who or what the world needs as the leader of the free world. A "mentality competent" piece of shit. Touche douche! Touche!
Biden may be not long ready for the old folks home. But Trump and his January 6th hooligans belong in jail! For me the right choice is clear in the reality of the two-party system we have. Papa Joe and his peeps who would preserve our democracy over Felonious Chump and his blind, ignorant, law breaking sheep!
-
By the way!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2926116]The New York Times op-ed page was an unbroken mass of calls for Biden to step down.[/QUOTE]Since when did right-wing, knuckle dragging, cro magnon, Rupukeians start citing the New York times as a source of credible news? As the man would say, what a pile of hypocritical, stinky "mularkey"! Papa Joe isn't going anywhere! And he's going to whup Felonious Chump's fat, lying ass one more time. Watch, wait, and see.
-
The Problem
The problem isn't that Biden isn't the man he was four years ago. People like Elvis don't give a shit about that! They didn't like him four years ago, they don't like him now, and they will never like him. No, the problem is that Felonious Chump [B]is[/B] the same asshole [B]he[/B] was four years ago. Unqualified, incompetent, amoral, and dictatorial. In other words, nothing has changed about Chump, leaving him unfit for office. Therefore, the only real choice in our two-party system is to go with the other camp. That's what I and millions and millions and millions of other Americans will be doing. Democracy itself is at stake. Felonious Chump and the rest of the Repukeians must be stopped again from ruining America! Four more years of Democratic rule!
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2926110]You think only 33% saying Biden won is bad?
[B]Majority of debate watchers say Trump won debate over Biden: CNN Poll.
June 28, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.business-standard.com/world-news/majority-of-debate-watchers-say-trump-won-debate-over-biden-cnn-poll-124062800222_1.html[/URL]
How about this?
[B]Romneys Strong Debate Performance Erases Obamas Lead.
GOP Challenger Viewed as Candidate with New Ideas.
Oct. 8, 2012[/B]
[URL]https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2012/10/08/romneys-strong-debate-performance-erases-obamas-lead/[/URL]
And, of course, Obama went on to win re-election over Romney. Was there Dem panic back in Oct. 2012? Yep.[/QUOTE]I think if they took a poll again, it would be 90% for Trump. People tend to go along with a crowd. I was used to Biden being so out of it so it did not bug me much seeing him. He even made a good point or two, but the media has been showing his gaffes and distorted facial expressions nonstop.
And I do not know what you are talking about with regards to panic and Romney v Obama. Romney and Dole were probably the two worst Republican candidates in 50 years. Any poll putting Romney over Obama had huge flaws, and no one was talking about Obama being replaced or Obama being mentally incompetent.
The thing about the debate and the people who thought Biden won were fools like you. You have been going on with your Thanks, Joe nonsense and not seeing Biden for the bumbling shell of a man that much of the country has now seen with its own eyes. Be.
The most telling question was about mental and physical competence. Trump said he recently won two golf tournaments, and it demonstrates what we all know. Trump still has it mentally and physically. Golf is a challenging mental and physical game.
With Biden, he says he has a 6 handicap in golf. Then a second later, he says he had an 8 handicap when he was vice president after Trump says that was his worst lie of the night. Later on, that night, we see Jill Biden helping Joe down the stairs. That video was not supposed to be shot, and we see her talking to her husband like a kindergartener, "Oh, Joe, you answered all those questions. ".
At this point, anyone who thinks Joe Biden is mentally and physically fit to be president is fucking nuts.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2926110]Perhaps typically pro Repub Mainstream Media will take a moment or two someday to recall that.[/QUOTE]LOL. The Republican media is not reporting anything new. They are doing a round of we told you so. This is a hilarious bit on Gutfield scolding the media for lying about Biden: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dy0-atnrWZE[/URL].
What is funny is with the liberal media we are seeing the same thing as we did with Covid. They are playing the "never mind, we never said that" game with Biden's incompetence. Just like they never advocated for school closings, social distancing, or hawking ineffective vaccines, now the deep state has told the media criticizing Biden's mental incompetence is okay. The NYT, WaPo, MSNBC, and Politico have completely flipped their script yet again. The more honest members of the liberal media like Bill Maher have been screaming about Biden's incompetence for months.
MSNBC's Morning Joe was the target in this video showing the hypocrisy of the liberal media but it could have been any of the liberal press. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URo8ntbyQ6o[/URL].
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2926110]Oh, and Romney wasn't a 34 time felon convicted of conspiracy to commit Election Fraud in order to steal a presidential election, found liable for rape, did not incite a violent mob of cop-killing Insurrectionists to storm the Capitol, stalk top elected officials for their public execution, overturn a free and fair election and overthrow American democracy and so on while he sat on his butt and did nothing except enjoy the show for 3+ hours and did not lie 1-2 times in every sentence he uttered at that debate.[/QUOTE]Well, even that is a positive now. That Biden was not charged criminally for having top secret documents in his home does not mean Biden is not a criminal. The reason given to not prosecute Biden was he was not mentally competent to stand trial and anyone who saw the debate knows that to be true.
So no one is voting FOR Biden anymore including you. If you cannot see that you are blind. You are voting against Trump and for a deep state cabal. Biden's body may still be functioning somewhat but his mind is gone.
-
1 photos
Oh?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2926269]People tend to go along with a crowd. So no one is voting FOR Biden anymore including you. If you cannot see that you are blind.[/QUOTE]Is that right? So, I guess it's OK if they go along with a crowd that you like. But if it's a crowd of Democrats, then that's just people who don't think for themselves and are acting like sheep pushing for a one-party system right? You're so full of it you reek bro! And again, millions and millions and millions of Americans are going to vote for Biden and other Democrats all over this land. Trump is going to lose, and then the shit is really going to hit the fan for his shifty, lying, odious, fat ass, loser self! Believe this.
-
I watched that debate. It was no calamity the pundits would have you believe.
[QUOTE=TheCane;2926288]Is that right? So, I guess it's OK if they go along with a crowd that you like. But if it's a crowd of Democrats, then that's just people who don't think for themselves and are acting like sheep pushing for a one-party system right? You're so full of it you reek bro! And again, millions and millions and millions of Americans are going to vote for Biden and other Democrats all over this land. Trump is going to lose, and then the shit is really going to hit the fan for his shifty, lying, odious, fat ass, loser self! Believe this.[/QUOTE]Pundits live in their own world, the one they created to thrive in. People who're capable of thinking for themselves don't think like them. They know shameless liars will ALWAYS have an edge in any debate. So Biden's performance won't change how people will vote, and they sure as hell won't deliver the Red Menace more votes just because Biden stumbled a few times.
[URL]https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/did-presidential-debate-change-anybodys-mind[/URL]
-
LOL--Calling it Now!
[QUOTE=TheCane;2926288]Is that right? So, I guess it's OK if they go along with a crowd that you like. But if it's a crowd of Democrats, then that's just people who don't think for themselves and are acting like sheep pushing for a one-party system right? You're so full of it you reek bro! And again, millions and millions and millions of Americans are going to vote for Biden and other Democrats all over this land. Trump is going to lose, and then the shit is really going to hit the fan for his shifty, lying, odious, fat ass, loser self! Believe this.[/QUOTE]You're one of the dumasses-- DJT shall Win by such a huge margin-- the election shall not be stealable like in 2020-.
America was cheated and we have had a Shit Stained Senile scumbag Fake president for the last 4 years.
-
LOL--Calling it Now!
[QUOTE=TheCane;2926288]Is that right? So, I guess it's OK if they go along with a crowd that you like. But if it's a crowd of Democrats, then that's just people who don't think for themselves and are acting like sheep pushing for a one-party system right? You're so full of it you reek bro! And again, millions and millions and millions of Americans are going to vote for Biden and other Democrats all over this land. Trump is going to lose, and then the shit is really going to hit the fan for his shifty, lying, odious, fat ass, loser self! Believe this.[/QUOTE]You're one of the dumasses-- DJT shall Win by such a huge margin-- the election shall not be stealable like in 2020-.
America was cheated and we have had a Shit Stained Senile scumbag Fake president for the last 4 years-- Try to pull your head out of your ass.
-
Debate
Good job, Joe! You answered all the questions! And you only blanked out a coupla times! And you didn't stumble when you left the podium! I guess all that practice memorizing lies really paid off! The dumbocrats are fucked. Well they have always been fucked up but now they are fucked. Have a nice day!
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2926288]Trump is going to lose, and then the shit is really going to hit the fan for his shifty, lying, odious, fat ass, loser self! Believe this.[/QUOTE]To quote Jimmy Dore, Trump is a glorified game show host. If you hate someone who is a glorified game show host this much that you actually care about what happens to him when he is not in office, you need to get a life.
I do not hate Biden. Hell, I do not even think he is running the show, but his policies are whacked: clean energy that is not clean and way more expensive, open borders, used to require the ridiculous mandatory Covid testing when entering the USA, adding 80,000 IRS agents, sending hundreds of billions down the drain to Ukraine, not even fucking talking to Putin to end the Ukraine war, completely impotent with Israel and the excessive killing in Gaza, the Afghanistan withdrawal, the billions allocated for energy charging stations and a whopping seven have been built, cancelling debt in exchange for political favor, mouthing off and showing no respect to SCOTUS, mass censorship, weaponizing the DOJ, and worst of all, trying to jail his pollical opposition. Yeah, nothing says saving Democracy like that.
Thing with you douches is you cannot separate Trump from his policies. All you do is call people names.
[QUOTE=TheCane;2926288] And again, millions and millions and millions of Americans are going to vote for Biden and other Democrats all over this land.[/QUOTE]If I were stuck somewhere and Trump pulled up in a car and offered to drive me somewhere, I would hop right in. If Biden did, I would say thank you sir but I am going to wait for an Uber. I am not getting into a car driven by someone with Biden's mental and physical condition and you know what? Neither would you. Oh, you can lie about it but if faced with that reality, you would not do it.
And what does it say about you people voting for Biden that you would put him in control of our nuclear arsenal but you would not let him drive a car? That is how bad your Trump derangement syndrome is. You hate Trump so much you would put someone demented in charge of our nuclear arsenal. You douches brag about how you would vote for someone with advanced dementia ahead of Trump, and that is why you people are fucking nuts.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2926269]I think if they took a poll again, it would be 90% for Trump. People tend to go along with a crowd. I was used to Biden being so out of it so it did not bug me much seeing him. He even made a good point or two, but the media has been showing his gaffes and distorted facial expressions nonstop.
And I do not know what you are talking about with regards to panic and Romney v Obama. Romney and Dole were probably the two worst Republican candidates in 50 years. Any poll putting Romney over Obama had huge flaws, and no one was talking about Obama being replaced or Obama being mentally incompetent.
The thing about the debate and the people who thought Biden won were fools like you. You have been going on with your Thanks, Joe nonsense and not seeing Biden for the bumbling shell of a man that much of the country has now seen with its own eyes. Be.
The most telling question was about mental and physical competence. Trump said he recently won two golf tournaments, and it demonstrates what we all know. Trump still has it mentally and physically. Golf is a challenging mental and physical game.
With Biden, he says he has a 6 handicap in golf. Then a second later, he says he had an 8 handicap when he was vice president after Trump says that was his worst lie of the night. Later on, that night, we see Jill Biden helping Joe down the stairs. That video was not supposed to be shot, and we see her talking to her husband like a kindergartener, "Oh, Joe, you answered all those questions. ".
At this point, anyone who thinks Joe Biden is mentally and physically fit to be president is fucking nuts.
LOL. The Republican media is not reporting anything new. They are doing a round of we told you so. This is a hilarious bit on Gutfield scolding the media for lying about Biden: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dy0-atnrWZE[/URL].
What is funny is with the liberal media we are seeing the same thing as we did with Covid. They are playing the "never mind, we never said that" game with Biden's incompetence. Just like they never advocated for school closings, social distancing, or hawking ineffective vaccines, now the deep state has told the media criticizing Biden's mental incompetence is okay. The NYT, WaPo, MSNBC, and Politico have completely flipped their script yet again. The more honest members of the liberal media like Bill Maher have been screaming about Biden's incompetence for months.
MSNBC's Morning Joe was the target in this video showing the hypocrisy of the liberal media but it could have been any of the liberal press. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URo8ntbyQ6o[/URL].
Well, even that is a positive now. That Biden was not charged criminally for having top secret documents in his home does not mean Biden is not a criminal. The reason given to not prosecute Biden was he was not mentally competent to stand trial and anyone who saw the debate knows that to be true.
So no one is voting FOR Biden anymore including you. If you cannot see that you are blind. You are voting against Trump and for a deep state cabal. Biden's body may still be functioning somewhat but his mind is gone.[/QUOTE]That poll was taken of people who had just watched the debate.
I would not say Biden "won" the debate. These debates are television quiz shows that have nothing to do with how a president has a meeting, discusses options, determines policy, makes a decision or anything of the kind. What are the winning points of a televised debate like that? The one who spoke the loudest? Uses the most words? Came up with the funniest pre-written joke and retort?
Absolutely, if we're scoring on truthfulness, Biden won hands down.
Absolutely, if we're scoring on positive policy plans for a 2nd term, Biden won hands down.
I hope most people noticed those two things regardless whether they scored on anything else.
That is all I was looking for. And many others probably feel the same.
Like me, many people already knew about Biden's verbal problems and were not disturbed by him mistakenly switching the word "Medicare" for "Covid" or fumbling phrases here and there or even losing a train of thought mid-sentence, all of which many of us do all time, especially when we are more concerned about how things look and sound in public rather than simply talking out loud.
I have seen debates where people known to be sharp as a tack would stop at precisely the same point at the end of a reply as Biden did that one time and literally say, "I'm sorry. What was the first part of your question"?
And so have you.
But Biden was in a position where he can't even do that perfectly normal thing without pundits and viewers saying "aHA! There it is! Cognitive impairment"!
I know a lot of people will not give Biden the benefit of putting that much thought into it. It remains to be seen which side prevails.
The fact that Biden overcomes any of his verbal or stuttering issues that crop up in big public oratory events and does not exhibit any such problem when reading prepared statements that he has clearly participated in crafting, writing and approving, even doing so better than Trump can, disproves any claim of him being cognitively impaired.
Cognitive Impairment does not vanish just because you are reading your rally speeches on a teleprompter. When Biden does that he does not stutter and fumble nearly as much as Trump does when he does the same thing. And he clearly demonstrates more understanding of what the words and phrases mean, what to emphasis and how to emphasis it or soft speak it on the fly even if the speech is over an our long.
No cognitively impaired, senile, alzheimer disease victim can do that as well as Biden can and does every day right up to today.
-
Trump's debate fitness question response explained: he lies and cheats.
In keeping with every other lying response Trump gave to every other question at the debate, when the moderators could finally get him to hear and understand the question well enough to answer with something remotely related to the topic of the question, Trump was even lying about his golf handicap:
[B]Trumps Own Reported Golf Scores Reveal He Cheats.
Chipping away at the strangest issue raised at the presidential debate.
June 28, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.thebulwark.com/p/trump-reported-golf-scores-reveal-he-cheats[/URL]
[QUOTE]Explaining why he believes he is in very good health, Trump said I just won two club championships, not even senior, two regular club championships.
..........
Biden, once an avid golfer, has hit the links a couple of dozen times as president so far. Trump spent all or part of about 300 days of his presidency golfing, more than any other president.
...........
In other words, Trump ignored the systems requirements and reported just the scores needed to produce the desired ego-inflating low-single-digit handicap, including made-up scores like that 70 especially made-up scores like that 70. And despite the many games he has played in the last four years, he has posted only one additional score to GHIN since 2020, and it was sufficient to drop his official USGA handicap index from 2.8 to 2.5.
In still other words, he lied.
[/QUOTE]LOL. Shrewdly, Biden did not just laugh off Trump's lie about his golf tournament record. He probably already knew Trump lies and cheats at golf every bit as much as he lies and cheats at everything else, meaning constantly. So he nursed along the topic that Trump brought up himself in order to lure him into blathering even more Trump material to blast with a simple Factcheck.
-
Wingers love what MSM deliver for them. And Vice Versa.
[QUOTE=TheCane;2926253]Since when did right-wing, knuckle dragging, cro magnon, Rupukeians start citing the New York times as a source of credible news? As the man would say, what a pile of hypocritical, stinky "mularkey"! Papa Joe isn't going anywhere! And he's going to whup Felonious Chump's fat, lying ass one more time. Watch, wait, and see.[/QUOTE]Over the decades, Wingers finally figured out that what Mainstream Media like the New York Times want and invariably get when Repubs win elections is the same thing they want;.
"DISASTER HAS STRUCK AGAIN"! . headlines.
Bad news is good for the media. Disastrous news is even better.
That is what Wingers want for America, too. That is why they vote for Repubs instead of Dems.
And that is also why MSM help Repubs win elections at every opportunity by downplaying the Repubs' horrific economic and national security policy and stewardship results throughout history right up to Trump and spectacularly good economic and national security policy results for Dems throughout history right up to Biden.
And how much has debate performance shown to determine the outcome of elections?
Zero.
Biden is still very much on track to win a 2nd term despite MSM pundits' extraordinary but typically pro Repub focus on a few spineless Dem hand-wringers:
[URL]https://twitter.com/MeidasTouch/status/1807262388913332389/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1807262388913332389¤tTweetUser=MeidasTouch[/URL]
-
Come on Elvis, you know your boy, LOL!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2926371]
If I were stuck somewhere and Trump pulled up in a car and offered to drive me somewhere, I would hop right in.[/QUOTE]If you were stuck somewhere and Trump was driving around, he would pull closer and splash you with a poodle.
-
Really?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2926371]To quote Jimmy Dore, Trump is a glorified game show host. If you hate someone who is a glorified game show host this much that you actually care about what happens to him when he is not in office, you need to get a life.[/QUOTE]That's pretty rich coming from you! You're the one with a zillion posts in this thread referring to people as "douches" because they hold political beliefs different from your own. Doesn't exactly come across as "love" to me LOL! Have a look in the mirror. Then practice what you preach.
-
Yes?
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2926352]You're one of the dumasses-- DJT shall Win by such a huge margin-- the election shall not be stealable like in 2020-.[/QUOTE]Well time is going to tell isn't it? And if you believe the election was stolen in 2020 then no [B]you[/B] are the anti-democracy, dangerous, dumbass who must be stopped.
-
The idea of replacing Biden is Foolhardy Nonsense
So says Allen Lichtman, a genuine Political Scientist, with a 90% success rate in predicting presidential election outcomes since 1984.
Actually, it would be 100% if only Florida had not been ordered to stop counting the 2000 Election ballots by the 5 Repubs in the SCOTUS as long as GW Bush was still squeaking out a 537 vote lead. My god. Imagine how much better America and the rest of the world would be today if only Bill Maher had not so repeatedly slammed Democrats while endorsing Ralph Nader that time.
But I digress.
Here is Allen Lichtman making the case for why it would be "foolhardy nonsense" for the Dems to replace Biden in this election. At the end is a nice followup discussion with 2 former Repub Campaign contributors where the smarter one of the two, Stuart Stevens, explains why any person would be stunned like a deer in the headlights if his debate opponent was given free rein to firehouse a steady stream of preposterous lies as Trump was allowed to do by the CNN debate moderators:
[URL]https://youtu.be/Pt8eRZTas_Q?si=1gayEvEX2K9Env7H[/URL]
And here is Stuart Stevens' NYT article that few if any Wingers are citing today:
[B]Democrats: Stop Panicking[/B]
[URL]https://dnyuz.com/2024/06/29/democrats-stop-panicking/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2926391]That poll was taken of people who had just watched the debate.[/QUOTE]Yes, and when people saw the Obama-Romney debate, the initial vote was Romney was ahead by a little. Subsequent polls showed Romney slaughtered Obama because people are herd animals and want to go to the winning side.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2926391]I would not say Biden "won" the debate. These debates are television quiz shows that have nothing to do with how a president has a meeting, discusses options, determines policy, makes a decision or anything of the kind. What are the winning points of a televised debate like that? The one who spoke the loudest? Uses the most words? Came up with the funniest pre-written joke and retort?
Absolutely, if we're scoring on truthfulness, Biden won hands down..[/QUOTE]Tooms, with you, good is Democrat and bad is Republican. When you say I would not say Biden won the debate, that is Thailand Tooms talk for Biden got his ass kicked. The funny part is not that Trump kicked Biden's ass and won, but Biden kicked his own ass and lost. Still, you cannot say Democrat bad with anything.
It is so funny to see Dems in panic mode one minute and think they have to switch out Biden. That was attempted spin #1. We have to get someone else. Then the dumb Dems realize they can't because Joe will not leave, which I said was the case, and then turn around and do spin #2. Now the debate is about honesty and vison. It was not about incompetence or cognition.
So here are you are on posting the latest hopium bullshit when if you were paying attention, it has already been shot down: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Py1id2nWLoU[/URL].
The boring part about the honesty bit is Biden has been a serial liar since he was elected to Congress. That is not new. The new part is the video of Biden playing golf and the clip of him getting off the stage in the debate. This reminds me of HRC falling down, but it was worse. Biden not only had Jill helping him down step by step, there were two men waiting to catch Biden if he fell, and there were like four stairs. Thing is Trump has a comedy bit about it.
The other funny part is Biden is going down to talk to his friends at CNN while Trump like runs alone off the stage. Trump was in enemy country and we knew it. The shocking part about the CNN moderators is that for the most part they were fair, and that caused Keith Olbermann, God what a douche that guy is, to lose his shit. He screamed that CNN should have fact checked Trump but also in the video, you see CNN fact checked Biden. So Olbermann was bitching at CNN for not being biased. LOL.
Of course, the CNN moderators now get that because of the Democratic douches and "rule of law" BS if Trump wins, it is easy for them to be put in jail. We can do the rule of law shit too where we just make up the law, ignore the statue of limitations, have a biased judge and jury, and jail someone. If Jake tapper were not fair, we Republicans would make it our mission to get Jake Tapper a cell next to Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro.
Finally, I have to give a shout out to the Dems who have been honest. Sadly, there have been very few. Steven A Smith tweeted this, So do y'all finally want to stop arguing with me about Biden now? Have your fears now been confirmed? Somebody. Please help! Biden's team wanted this? His staff, His loved ones. How could you put him out there like that! How could you!
With black people, Steven A Smith was telling the truth and got beat up by the NAACP. The video is even better: [URL]https://x.com/franko_ufo/status/1807195108904677585[/URL].
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2926410]If you were stuck somewhere and Trump was driving around, he would pull closer and splash you with a poodle.[/QUOTE]And Cane asks me why I call you guys douches.
[URL]https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-quiet-acts-kindness/[/URL]
"A rabbi's critically ill son needs to get from NYC to California for specialty care. No airlines will fly him. The generous man uses his private jet to fly the child. "
Another accurate description, which we addressed at greater length in a 2015 fact check. In July 1988, the Ten family needed to travel to New York for urgent medical treatment for their three-year-old son Andrew Ten, who had a rare respiratory condition. Because Andrew required the constant aid of a respirator and life support machine but commercial airlines could not accommodate that equipment, the family could not travel to New York on a conventional flight.
The boy's father, Harold Ten, an orthodox Jewish rabbi, contacted Trump to ask for the use of his private jet, and the property magnate agreed without hesitation, according to a contemporaneous report by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency:
Asked why he thought Trump made his private jet available, Ten replied, "Because he is a good man. He has three children of his own and he knows what being a parent is all about. " Ten said he believes that Trump fulfilled the Talmudic saying that "he who saves one person's life is as if he saved the entire world. "
Among the relatives at the airport to greet the child and his parents were the paternal grandparents of the sick boy. "Donald Trump is a miracle, just a miracle," said grandmother Feigy Ten, who came to the airport with her husband, Phillip Ten. Both grandparents thanked Trump's generosity over and over again.
And Xpartan, I know how you will react. Yeah, that is not true. Trump would splash you with his car if you needed a ride. Ha ha ha!
This is one of those liberal fact checkers that did the story, but that will not matter to you. You believe what you do and find facts to support your belief instead of looking for truth.
-
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9d4xZEgZ9E[/URL]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nHLuw9ZDoo[/URL]
I'd bang Amber Rose before I'd bang Taylor Swift.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2925595]We have all heard the incessant whining, whimpering, wild conspiracy theories and neverending lame excuses for why everyone who knows Trump, works with Trump, has ever seen, heard and observed Trump, as well as Trump himself, is certain he will totally fuck it up on style, technique and, most assuredly, on content vs [b]"a feeble old man who can't walk, can't talk, can't put two words together, doesn't know who he is or where he is unless he chugs a quart of Mountain Dew moments before airtime. "[/b][/QUOTE]I don't know about the first part of your post, but you nailed it at the end, the bold text.
-
Nope
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2926543]I don't know about the first part of your post, but you nailed it at the end, the bold text.[/QUOTE]Biden had problems. But they were not what Trump / Wingers repeatedly claimed, what I wrote and what you highlighted.
But anyone who predicted Trump would lie in every answer got it right. And they could have added that Trump was going to try to dodge answering many if not most of the questions and they would have gotten that part right, too.
-
No notable post-debate bump for Trump
It seems most Americans are about as fine with a verbally weak truth-teller with a superior record of results as POTUS as they are disturbed by a fast-talking liar with the worst record of results in history as a so-called potus after the 1st debate as they were before it:
[B]Warning Signs For Biden: Post-Debate Polls Show More Voters Worried About Bidens FitnessBut Race Still Virtually Tied.[/B]
[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianbushard/2024/06/29/warning-signs-for-biden-post-debate-polls-show-more-voters-worried-about-bidens-fitness-but-race-still-virtually-tied/[/URL]
[QUOTE]The first polls released after Thursdays presidential debatecharacterized by a rocky performance by President Joe Bidenshow an increasing number of Americans believe the 81-year-old president is too old and should drop out of the race, though at least two polls found Biden still maintains a narrow edge over former President Donald Trump.
..........
[B]Despite voters worries, the debate hasnt dented Bidens standing against Trump yet, with most surveys still showing a neck-and-neck race. Biden actually gained some ground according to Ipsos polling: Trump and Biden were tied 44%-44% before the debate, but Biden took a 46%-44% lead afterwards.
Morning Consults polling delivered a similar result: Biden was tied with Trump 44%-44% before the debate, and Biden led Trump 45%-44% afterwards.[/b] According to FiveThirtyEights weighted polling average, however, Trump remains on top by a small margin, with 41.3% of voters supporting him over 40.7% for Biden.[/QUOTE]Often, these post-debate bumps, even notable ones, fade after a week or two. It remains to be seen how long weak bumps like this one will last.
Either way, as Allan Lichtman's keys to the presidency have shown time and time again, debate performances and declared "winners" of these relatively meaningless quiz shows have zero predictive value with regard to election outcomes.
After all, Trump is still out there lying his ass off with virtually every sentence that comes out of his pie-hole, he is still only able to brag about giving permanent tax cuts to millionaires and billionaires, brag about setting in motion the outlawing of Sex For Pleasure in America while he cries and whines about being picked on so much, how much America SUCKS and so on.
Meanwhile, Biden is out there demonstrating that when he is not bombarded by a firehose of blatant lies from a former so-called potus on a televised quiz show, (and now that his cold has passed and he is no longer taking medication for it) his voice is sure and strong, he has vigor, energy and a totally cognitively competent grasp of the facts, the superior policies and plans to Make a Great America Even Greater.
Voters can't help but notice that.
-
I'm not you Elvis. I never obscure, ignore or bend the truth to conform to my faith.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2926512]And Cane asks me why I call you guys douches.
[URL]https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-quiet-acts-kindness/[/URL]
"A rabbi's critically ill son needs to get from NYC to California for specialty care. No airlines will fly him. The generous man uses his private jet to fly the child. "
Another accurate description, which we addressed at greater length in a 2015 fact check. In July 1988, the Ten family needed to travel to New York for urgent medical treatment for their three-year-old son Andrew Ten, who had a rare respiratory condition. Because Andrew required the constant aid of a respirator and life support machine but commercial airlines could not accommodate that equipment, the family could not travel to New York on a conventional flight.
The boy's father, Harold Ten, an orthodox Jewish rabbi, contacted Trump to ask for the use of his private jet, and the property magnate agreed without hesitation, according to a contemporaneous report by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency:
Asked why he thought Trump made his private jet available, Ten replied, "Because he is a good man. He has three children of his own and he knows what being a parent is all about. " Ten said he believes that Trump fulfilled the Talmudic saying that "he who saves one person's life is as if he saved the entire world. "
Among the relatives at the airport to greet the child and his parents were the paternal grandparents of the sick boy. "Donald Trump is a miracle, just a miracle," said grandmother Feigy Ten, who came to the airport with her husband, Phillip Ten. Both grandparents thanked Trump's generosity over and over again.
And Xpartan, I know how you will react. Yeah, that is not true. Trump would splash you with his car if you needed a ride. Ha ha ha!
This is one of those liberal fact checkers that did the story, but that will not matter to you. You believe what you do and find facts to support your belief instead of looking for truth.[/QUOTE]Why? I performed a quick Google check, found reliable sources that had reported on this story and found it to be true. Nothing easier.
The question (which is not really a question) is why you and your comrades in arms are incapable of mastering the same simple procedure.
Still, that was your 1998 Trump. The 2024 Trump would totally splash you with a poodle, LOL.
P.S. Wasn't he a Democrat around that time, BTW?
-
Double Haters
They don't like Trump. They don't like Biden. If they vote (if), then they will hold their noses and vote along party lines. It's going to be close! Nobody is blowing the other side out.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2926681]Why? I performed a quick Google check, found reliable sources that had reported on this story and found it to be true. Nothing easier.[/QUOTE]Sure, Mr. Fuck the EU never happened.
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2926681]P.S. Wasn't he a Democrat around that time, BTW?[/QUOTE]Well, that explains why hookers costs so much more in blue states than red ones. Douches like you ask party affiliation when it comes to hookers because for a douche like yourself that is all that matters.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2926765]They don't like Trump. They don't like Biden. If they vote (if), then they will hold their noses and vote along party lines. It's going to be close! Nobody is blowing the other side out.[/QUOTE]LOL. If you think that, you should head to the UK or Canada and put our money on Biden. You put $100 on Biden and if he wins, you get $400. You have to put $200 on Trump to get $100. Then there is the field (Newsom, Harris, RFK Jr. , Michelle Obama). Funny part is Newsom odds of winning are only half that of Biden.
The most accurate predictive tool in elections are casino odds, and I have never seen anything like this. The easiest elections to predict in my lifetime were Clinton in 1996 and Obama in 2012, and we are getting close to that. An incumbent president with 20% odds to win re-election in casino odds is not a tight race.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2926595]It seems most Americans are about as fine with a verbally weak truth-teller with a superior record of results as POTUS as they are disturbed by a fast-talking liar with the worst record of results in history as a so-called potus after the 1st debate as they were before it:
Often, these post-debate bumps, even notable ones, fade after a week or two. It remains to be seen how long weak bumps like this one will last.
Either way, as Allan Lichtman's keys to the presidency have shown time and time again, debate performances and declared "winners" of these relatively meaningless quiz shows have zero predictive value with regard to election outcomes.
After all, Trump is still out there lying his ass off with virtually every sentence that comes out of his pie-hole, he is still only able to brag about giving permanent tax cuts to millionaires and billionaires, brag about setting in motion the outlawing of Sex For Pleasure in America while he cries and whines about being picked on so much, how much America SUCKS and so on.
Meanwhile, Biden is out there demonstrating that when he is not bombarded by a firehose of blatant lies from a former so-called potus on a televised quiz show, (and now that his cold has passed and he is no longer taking medication for it) his voice is sure and strong, he has vigor, energy and a totally cognitively competent grasp of the facts, the superior policies and plans to Make a Great America Even Greater.
Voters can't help but notice that.[/QUOTE]LOL. Yeah, by all means let's listen to the douche media who said Biden was fit as a fiddle play the Alinsky game of accusing your opponent of what you are guilty of. We are not the liars; Trump is! Yes, Biden with the 6 handicap is Mr. Telling the truth. And the cold medicine? Who else looks and talks like that after cold medicine?
The only honest way you can say Biden lied less than Trump is because no one could understand what the hell he was saying.
As for the debate not mattering, that may be a bigger lie than the 6 handicap but by all means cue the Democratic douche "expert" who says it does not matter. But for those us with working brains and think for ourselves, we can see that was not true.
[URL]https://www.vegasinsider.com/politics/us-presidential-election-odds-biden-trump-2024-debate/[/URL]
Ninety minutes of debate between Biden and Trump definitely made an impression on bettors Thursday night and into Friday. Biden visibly struggled throughout the debate, leading to a surge of action and improved odds on Trump both during and after the contest.
"It's been the busiest day so far for election betting," Ladbrokes head of political betting Kyle McGrath said on Friday afternoon. "At the start of the debate, we had Donald Trump -137 and Joe Biden +175 to win the election, with Biden a -700 favorite to win the Democratic nomination.
"Shortly after the debate concluded, this had changed to -175 Trump vs. +300 Biden, with Biden out to -175 just to win the Democratic nomination. ".
Biden eventually slipped as far as +400 to win the election and is at +300 at Ladbrokes a day after the debate.
Paddy Power also made several shifts in its US presidential election odds market. Before the debate, short favorite Trump was toggling between -137 and -150. Post-debate, Trump got to -200, and he's now -175.
Biden was shifting between +150 and +188 pre-debate, and +300/+400 in the aftermath. Biden is currently +400.
Paddy Power also made a significant shift on California Gov. Gavin Newsom's odds to win the USA Presidential election. Newsom was +2000 pre-debate and moved all the way into +650 afterward.
"It looks like our customers believe Newsom is Biden his time. They're backing Newsom in droves," Paddy Power spokesperson Rachael Kane said.
End of link.
So Thailand Tooms make sure you take pic for us as you waddle up to the casino and put your money on blue Biden. As you can see, it is the deal of a lifetime!
-
Less MAGA Babies?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2926113]And here you go again. You know NOTHING about medicine. First off, you have lied and lost on abortion. Second, you make this completely idiotic comment that Obs are all Democratic loving douches like yourself.
Quite frankly, the OB field is filled with losers who could not get into orthopedics, men who want to control women at their most vulnerable, and female lesbians looking to score. Thank God they are in that field because women in Africa somehow make it by with childbirth and unlike orthopedists who often are operating on seniors, OB / Gyns are operating on young women and have a large margin for error because their patients are so healthy. They have a reputation for being the WORST surgeons there are.
And with regards to medicine and not surgery, their training is pure shit. They do little if any training in intensive medicine. They are not medicine people but surgeons and their prescribing habits, which are often horrible, reflect that. Again, because their patients are so healthy they get away with prescribing stupidly.
The exceptions to the rule are the positive doctors who look at being an OB as bringing life into the world. They thrive on the joy of child birth and are usually very religious. They often are prominent members in their church and are known and loved within their communities. And this may shock you, but these doctors fucking HATE abortion. They do not do it and do not want to. But if a member of their congregation has an incomplete miscarriage they would not treat it? Are you out of your fucking mind? [/QUOTE]
(...kkkk!) Just another classic, counter intuitive, counter intelligent, nonsensical, INCEL, misogynist, Elvis 2008 rant! Tell me Elvis 2008, how do you have an abortion, if you, yourself or a woman is NOT pregnant?
What I do know is, apparently far more than the INCEL, misogynist, armchair voodoo-witch doctor, who would have women and doctors in red states, look to Africa as a shining beacon of example, as it is Sub-Saharan Africa, that leads the world in maternal deaths. Duh, what a brilliant assessment for red states, Doc Elvis 2008!
There is one thing that all your poppycock and hogwash nonsense did highlight, is that your fool's errant and penchant for the moronic avocation, of dystopian red states, when it comes to having adequate, safe and reliable women's pregnancy/abortion healthcare and OBGYN doctors, seems to border on the ludicrous and insane.
I mean, your dystopian red state outlook, [b]seems to advocate in favor of less babies being born in red states[/b] and more red state OBGYN doctors leaving, more mothers either never again having childbirth or dying from complications, that were preventable with drugs such as Mifepristone.
So I guess, [b]the silver lining to your rant[/b], would be that your saying, red states are going to have a reduction in childbirth, have less babies popping out and growing up to be ReThuglicans, mini-me Trump imitators, MAGA babies and dumbasses like Elvis 2008, then I retract my comment about your "rant". You're SPOT ON! (....kkkk!)
Carry On Ranting!
[u][b]In this episode of "Paycheck Superhero":[/b][/u]
It seems "Paycheck Superhero", has turned his back on his own kind and has opted for the African Sub-Saharan pregnancy death maternity rates for red states.
[u]Stay tuned to find out:[/u]
• If "Paycheck Superhero"'s trip to Sub-Saharan African, will yield any results necessary enough, to save red states and their MAGA babies mortality rate and death by pregnancy complication dilemmas.
Stay Tuned...
-
Election 2024 for President Biden, completing the Trifecta!
[U]The Trifecta:[/U]
[LIST][b]First,[/b] it was in 1992, that ex-President Bill Clinton, who was down in "the polls" to Ross Perot (and George Bush), by double-digits (15) points and was seen to be running a losing campaign and calls went out for him to be replaced.
[b]Second,[/b] it was then in 2016, that ex-President Donald J. Trump, who was caught on tape in an Access Hollywood scandal, saying, [quote]"I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you've a star they let you do it..." and then goes on to say [b]"You can do anything...grab them by the pussy"[/b][/quote]
Repubs were all declaring, they couldn't with good conscience, [b]"look their daughters in the eye"[/b] and vote for or back a [i]"pussy grabbing"[/i] president and the calls went out for Trump to step-aside. {...yet lo and behold!}
[b]Third,[/b] now comes President Joe Biden, who didn't perform his best, in an otherwise meaningless 2024 debate, but fared better than his lying predecessor, and is still even or better than a coin-flip in the "the polls", given his age and slightly poorer than usual debate performance, and there are calls for him to step-down.[/LIST]
[B][u]What does this trifecta, all have in common?:[/u][/B]
Well, despite being eviscerated by their respective parties, MSM and campaign donors, due to their constant bemoaning of cries to step-down, premature Pollyanna gyrations and failures in "the polls", or the "pussy grabbing" sexual abuse of women and their rights, or the age related minor slippage in a debating performance, has only meant one thing, when the respective presumptive nominee, [B]STAYS THE COURSE...[/B].
All have (or will) gone on, to win the presidential election. It will be no different for a Joe Biden WIN in 2024, completing the trifecta and proving the naysayers and detractors...WRONG!
-
Huh?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2926793]Sure, Mr. Fuck the EU never happened.[/QUOTE]Elvis, dude, you know you need to lay off the sauce when no one but yourself has any idea what you're trying to say.
-
Right on!
[QUOTE=Spidy;2926900][U]The Trifecta:[/U]
[LIST][b]First,[/b] it was in 1992, that ex-President Bill Clinton, who was down in "the polls" to Ross Perot (and George Bush), by double-digits (15) points and was seen to be running a losing campaign and calls went out for him to be replaced.
[b]Second,[/b] it was then in 2016, that ex-President Donald J. Trump, who was caught on tape in an Access Hollywood scandal, saying,
Repubs were all declaring, they couldn't with good conscience, [b]"look their daughters in the eye"[/b] and vote for or back a [i]"pussy grabbing"[/i] president and the calls went out for Trump to step-aside. {...yet lo and behold!}
[b]Third,[/b] now comes President Joe Biden, who didn't perform his best, in an otherwise meaningless 2024 debate, but fared better than his lying predecessor, and is still even or better than a coin-flip in the "the polls", given his age and slightly poorer than usual debate performance, and there are calls for him to step-down.[/LIST]
[B][u]What does this trifecta, all have in common?:[/u][/B]
Well, despite being eviscerated by their respective parties, MSM and campaign donors, due to their constant bemoaning of cries to step-down, premature Pollyanna gyrations and failures in "the polls", or the "pussy grabbing" sexual abuse of women and their rights, or the age related minor slippage in a debating performance, has only meant one thing, when the respective presumptive nominee, [B]STAYS THE COURSE...[/B].
All have (or will) gone on, to win the presidential election. It will be no different for a Joe Biden WIN in 2024, completing the trifecta and proving the naysayers and detractors...WRONG![/QUOTE]These right wing clowns don't seem to remember that you don't spike the ball until [B]after[/B] you've crossed the goal line!
-
All recent evidence is conclusive
At the Presidential Debate Quiz Show, I saw President Joe Biden walk, I heard him talk, I heard him put more than 2 words together, knew who he was and where he was. And I saw the verbal flubs. A couple of big ones.
However, anyone who watched and heard Joe Biden respond to having been crowned King Biden by the 6 Wingers on the SCOTUS today as well as his recent campaign speech, his SOTU Address along with a slew of other recent examples, saw and heard conclusive evidence of this inarguable conclusion; President Joe Biden does not suffer from cognitive impairment or incapacity.
No one has yet explained how and why this supposed cognitive "impairment" or "incapacity" miraculously vanishes when Biden crafts complex policies, writes, contributes to, edits, approves and then delivers a prepared presentation in a speech, albeit scrolling up on a teleprompter, in a State of the Union Address, an appearance before Congress or foreign dignitaries, and does so with obvious complete understanding of every word, phrase, sentence and, most important, concept, with all the proper emphasis and inflection to convey those concepts to everyone in the room.
Not to mention he can and does that to this very day better, more naturally and with fewer glitches and occasional bobbles than Trump, who often comes up with total gobbledygook and words that don't exist even when reading it.
There is also no evidence of Biden having this stuttering-related issue in one-on-one or small group conversations, even those being audio / video recorded, as in the case of his recent 75 minute Howard Stern interview.
Biden clearly has an on-the-fly public oratory stuttering problem that occasionally manifests itself embarrasingly only under certain circumstances during, say, a Presidential Debate Quiz Show, not a cognitive capacity problem. That has virtually nothing to do with the way a president contemplates, is advised, advises, makes decisions or presents those decisions to the public and anyone else who needs to hear and understand them.
Being better at the former comes in handy if you want to deliver an impromptu 20 minute rant on death by electrocution vs being eaten by a shark. Being better at the latter comes in handy if you want to promote and pass historic, often bi-partisan legislation that, for just one example, has created more jobs than all three and working on all four of the previous Republican presidents combined in just his 1st term as President.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2926938]Elvis, dude, you know you need to lay off the sauce when no one but yourself has any idea what you're trying to say.[/QUOTE]LOL. It was something no one else here should understand but you. Did you google who infamously said Fuck the EU and what context it was in, and think about what point I was making in bringing in? Nope, and you just proved my point. Did you know the word gullible is not in the dictionary?
-
Trump's only debate ability
Everyone noticed the flurry of lies coming out of Trump's pie hole at the Presidential Debate Quiz Show. It was no different from what we have all been hearing coming out of his pie hole since 2015.
But at this quiz show he kept coming back to a few favorite Trump Big Lies regarding Immigration, crime, the economy under him vs Biden, etc. I suspect because, even though he knows his only way to survive the kind of "Trump policy" scrutiny the debate threatened to provide required him to use the [B]Gish Gallop[/B] technique, it was much easier for him to simply keep repeating a few favorite Trump Lies over and over again rather than come up with a variety of new ones for every question and response.
And, of course, he and his handlers knew that was an especially effective technique to use against a stutterer opponent. I also suspect he knows Biden will be much more prepared for it next time. If Trump is willing to risk a next time.
[B]What Is Gish Gallop and What Does It Have To Do With Thursdays Debate?[/B]
[URL]https://bearingdrift.com/2024/06/29/what-is-gish-gallop-and-what-does-it-have-to-do-with-thursdays-debate/[/URL]
[QUOTE]I learned a new phrase this week: Gish gallop. Thank you, Dr. Heather Cox Richardson.
In her June 27 Letters from an American, she recapped that nights first Presidential debate between Democratic President Joe Biden and Republican ex-President Donald Trump, and in it she introduced her readers to Gish gallop:
[B]"This was not a debate. It was Trump using a technique that actually has a formal name, the Gish gallop, although I suspect he comes by it naturally. Its a rhetorical technique in which someone throws out a fast string of lies, non-sequiturs, and specious arguments, so many that it is impossible to fact-check or rebut them in the amount of time it took to say them. Trying to figure out how to respond makes the opponent look confused, because they dont know where to start grappling with the flood that has just hit them.
It is a form of gaslighting, and it is especially effective on someone with a stutter, as Biden has. It is similar to what Trump did to Biden during a debate in 2020.
In that case, though, the lack of muting on the mics left Biden simply saying: Will you shut up, man? a comment that resonated with the audience. Giving Biden the enforced space to answer by killing the mic of the person not speaking tonight actually made the technique more effective."[/b]
..........
So while I was unfamiliar with the term Gish gallop, I was familiar with the technique. A Republican colleague used to spew a stream of arguments at me, non-stop, then ask a question, and not allow my response but, instead, talked over me as I tried to answer. It clutters the mind, especially for someone like me who can respond much better with the written word than a verbal response.
I suspect Joes speech issues may have had him in the same spot. You have two minutes to respond do you rebut the lies or try to explain policy?
Gish gallop. Got it. Thanks, Heather![/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2922798]First, the Winger-owned Wall Street Jounal concocted a "report" about Joe Biden supposedly "slipping" mentally at a meeting that, no surprise, was comprised of known Repub liars' opinion and no truth-telling Dem opinion. Including one well-documented Repub former Squeaker of the House who was known to have made a similar public statement that he totally contradicted in private:
[B]The Wall Street Journals story about Bidens mental acuity suffers from glaring problems.
June 6, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/06/media/wall-street-journal-biden-mental-acuity/index.html[/URL]
Then, the Sinclair Winger Broadcast Group of local news outlets are caught repeating the Winger-owned WST bullshit "report" on their local outlets, which polls show viewers believe to be "more trustworthy" than the national outlets, apparently all reading from the exact same Winger script:
[B]Watch: Local Sinclair Anchors Read Same Shady Script on Bidens Age.
Local news anchors across the country are reading from the exact same script on Joe Biden.
June 11, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://newrepublic.com/post/182567/sinclair-right-wing-script-biden-age-local-news[/URL]
[/QUOTE]This post has not aged well. The investigative journalists at WSJ came out with a sequel, about foreign leaders who've noticed the decline in the President's mental acuity. Then there was the debate. Last night on CNN, Carl Bernstein, one of the Washington Post reporters who broke Watergate, reiterated what the WSJ wrote, and said journalists have known about it for a long while.
Why wasn't it reported? Why did they cover it up? Well, because they're mostly biased towards your side. Take a look at [URL]allsides.com[/URL]. They rank media from far left, which is assigned a value of -6, to far right, which is +6. Except for the Wall Street Journal, newspapers with large, nationwide circulation are rated around -2 to -2. 5. The Wall Street Journal, based on its news reporting (not its editorial page) is rated -0. 2. The Wall Street Journal, Fair and Balanced.
-
6-3 Supreme Court decision on Presidential Immunity
"Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of presidential power entitles a former president to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court. "And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts. ".
How unfortunate that the opinion included the words "absolute immunity from criminal prosecution". Pardons, an official act, that would not be subjected to prosecutions, even if the pardon is criminal in nature. I fault the argument against absolute immunity for it didn't bring it closer to home to some of these justices. The example set out from Judge Pan at the appelate was what if a president order SEAL Team six to execute a rival. At the supreme court, I would have brought another example closer to home for the 9 justices. If a president suggested in a speech that someone should take out a justice or justices who are not "loyal to the American people" would be pardon. This example would have perked them up.
It's a shame that they decided for that possibility.
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2927104]"Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of presidential power entitles a former president to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court. "And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts. ".
How unfortunate that the opinion included the words "absolute immunity from criminal prosecution". Pardons, an official act, that would not be subjected to prosecutions, even if the pardon is criminal in nature. I fault the argument against absolute immunity for it didn't bring it closer to home to some of these justices. The example set out from Judge Pan at the appelate was what if a president order SEAL Team six to execute a rival. At the supreme court, I would have brought another example closer to home for the 9 justices. If a president suggested in a speech that someone should take out a justice or justices who are not "loyal to the American people" would be pardon. This example would have perked them up.
It's a shame that they decided for that possibility.[/QUOTE]CM, I do not think you understand the decision. Obama famously droned and killed an American citizen without the due process of a trial. Do you think after the SCOTUS ruling Obama has immunity for that?
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2926954]These right wing clowns don't seem to remember that you don't spike the ball until [B]after[/B] you've crossed the goal line![/QUOTE]This election odds were 59-36 in Trump's favor before the debate. It was Green Bay, who owns the Chicago Bears, versus the bears before the debate. Now we have learned that so much of the Bears team is sick that they may have to be substituted for, and the odds are 67-20 now. Or as permadouche Spidy / Joy would say of 67-20 odds, a coin flip.
As far as spiking the ball, why would I do that? You douches may think 2020 was the most fair election of all time, but we don't, and among one of the many reasons I think that is the Democratic primaries were rigged.
And in this Democratic primary season, we Republicans did not even have to say everything. You have RFK Jr, a life long Democrat, saying he has to run as an independent because the Democratic primaries are so rigged. In some states, ballots are printed with only Biden's name on them. This is the douche version of a fair election. RFK Jr. Is shouted down as some antivax loser by the leftie media instead of being beaten at the ballot box.
Now we get this Democratic panic when the MSM douches have a news flash. This just in. Biden is old. There are two Democrats pols the polls show have a shot at beating Trump, Michelle Obama, who does not want the nomination, and RFK Jr. You cannot make this shit up.
You douches were such chicken shits with RFK Jr. He could not even be on the ballot. He was anti-Fauci, anti-deep state, and anti-drug company, and the Dems could not have that. Hell, Dems are still suing RFK Jr. To keep him off the presidential ballot.
So if the election were tomorrow and were IMO shown to be fair, I would put every dime I had on Trump. But with the lawsuits, the cheating, the deep state with its assassins, and a potential health issue in the next four months given Trump's age, I think 67% is about right.
But I am not spiking the football when I think you douches have the refs paid off.
On the other hand, if you douches are so certain Biden is going to win, and he is getting 4-1 odds, why don't you shut up and bet on him instead of mouthing off on how he is going to win?
Yeah, I get it. That concept of risk and thinking for yourself and acting ion your own thoughts is too tough for you all. You have to be told what to do by the NYT and MSNBC.
The douche way of gambling is to go to the roulette wheel bet on green, wait for the ball to land on red, and say, "Why didn't the ball land on black? Racist much?" and suing the casino out of business.
-
[B]What happened to "free speech" in this case[/B]?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2926991]Did you google who infamously said Fuck the EU and what context it was in, and think about what point I was making in bringing in?[/QUOTE]I apologize Elvis. I did not google it. But do remember who said "Fuck the Police". It is still one of my favorite songs to this day. LOL! Caused a serious political uproar when it came out.
[URL]https://www.gq.com/story/nwa-fuck-the-police-live-detroit[/URL]
I think the President should be able to pull straight mafia gangster moves. If the President of the United States feels like it is the interest of the country to put a hit out on someone, that someone better run like a ***** cause he going to get hit. President has to be as powerful of the Kings of the world. MBS said: Hit him. The kings men got it done.
Don't fuck with me about morality. It is cruel world. I accepted a long time ago that if someone in the real world wants you dead, and they do not care if they get caught. Friends in family will miss you terriblely and think of your often.
-
Old biddy potty mouths....
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2926512]And Cane asks me why I call you guys douches ...
...blah, blah, blah... [/QUOTE]
No big explanation needed, as I'm sure many an old biddy, has told Elvis 2008 over the years,
[b]"What an ugly [i]'potty mouth'[/i], you have!"[/b] (...kkkk!)
-
Bernstein on CNN
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2927077]This post has not aged well. The investigative journalists at WSJ came out with a sequel, about foreign leaders who've noticed the decline in the President's mental acuity. Then there was the debate. Last night on CNN, Carl Bernstein, one of the Washington Post reporters who broke Watergate, reiterated what the WSJ wrote, and said journalists have known about it for a long while.
Why wasn't it reported? Why did they cover it up? Well, because they're mostly biased towards your side. Take a look at [URL]allsides.com[/URL]. They rank media from far left, which is assigned a value of -6, to far right, which is +6. Except for the Wall Street Journal, newspapers with large, nationwide circulation are rated around -2 to -2. 5. The Wall Street Journal, based on its news reporting (not its editorial page) is rated -0. 2. The Wall Street Journal, Fair and Balanced.[/QUOTE]Oh, why be shy? There is a video clip of Bernstein on CNN that you could have posted.
This is the one below, right? He reports 2nd hand comments from other people "also of numerous inexplicable moments" of Biden "losing his train of thought and can't pick it up again" that ought to be looked into, perhaps by a doctor. I agree.
BTW, Bernstein does not use the words "Cognitive impairment", "Cognitive incapacity" or even "Cognitive decline", the latter of which would be expected for anyone over the age of 50 and still would not disqualify them for the job of President.
See, I thought you were being shy about providing the actual link because, being the well-known fair and unbiased "Bothsider / Neithersider" here, you did not want to show off those admirable traits by including the OTHER things Bernstein said he has been hearing about Joe Biden from those exact same people referenced above and more:
That [B]"No question about it, I have known for two years", that Biden is "GREAT when you see him. SHARP. Has an ABSOLUTE COMMAND of the facts, as SHARP as can be"[/B] in his detailed briefings on Ukraine and other presidential level topics. ".
[B]Bernstein says sources suggest concerns about Biden have been growing for a year.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/01/politics/video/carl-bernstein-biden-performance-presidential-debate-ac360-digvid[/URL]
Oh, look! CNN must also be shy about mentioning any of those OTHER things Bernstein said about Biden in the big bold headlines or in the body of the text in that report.
Why didn't CNN or you do that? Why, like you, did they cover it up? Well, because CNN, the template for Mainstream Media cable news, is mostly biased to your side, we can only suppose.
Meanwhile, I presume NOBODY told Bernstein for all four years of Trump's horrific presidency how "sharp" Trump was and had "an absolute command of the facts" at any presidential level meeting any more than any CEO did at the meeting Trump spoke at recently:
[B]CEOs at Trump meeting: Ex-president meandering and doesnt know what hes talking about[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/14/ceos-at-trump-meeting-not-impressed.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
Interesting. It also appears NOBODY ever came out of a meeting with Joe Biden describing him as "meandering" and that he "didn't know what he is talking about. ".
Oh well.
-
Yup
[QUOTE=Spidy;2927165]No big explanation needed, as I'm sure many an old biddy, has told Elvis 2008 over the years,
[b]"What an ugly [i]'potty mouth'[/i], you have!"[/b] (...kkkk!)[/QUOTE]I wasn't "wondering" about anything. Not worth my time. He does what he does with that, and that's that, among other things. No explanation needed. Like with the rest of the "basket of deplorables" LMAO!
-
Well -- You don't have to worry about DJT
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2927104]"Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of presidential power entitles a former president to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court. "And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts. ".
How unfortunate that the opinion included the words "absolute immunity from criminal prosecution". Pardons, an official act, that would not be subjected to prosecutions, even if the pardon is criminal in nature. I fault the argument against absolute immunity for it didn't bring it closer to home to some of these justices. The example set out from Judge Pan at the appelate was what if a president order SEAL Team six to execute a rival. At the supreme court, I would have brought another example closer to home for the 9 justices. If a president suggested in a speech that someone should take out a justice or justices who are not "loyal to the American people" would be pardon. This example would have perked them up.
It's a shame that they decided for that possibility.[/QUOTE]So, Biden can have DJT taken out if your worries are true-- And why wouldn't the people who have their hands up senile Joe's ass not have him do it? They seem to have no scruples.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2927121]CM, I do not think you understand the decision. Obama famously droned and killed an American citizen without the due process of a trial. Do you think after the SCOTUS ruling Obama has immunity for that?[/QUOTE]Yes, if Republicans want to prosecute Obama for killing Americans with drones, or Biden for involuntary manslaughter for rapes and murders committed by illegals, they're now shit out of luck.
Republicans and Democrats shouldn't be ecstatic or upset about the court decision. It's going to make it harder to prosecute a president for anything he does while in office that relates to his official duties, so there's less ability for one side to persecute an ex-president it doesn't like through the court system. That's better left to the ballot box, or perhaps the impeachment process IMHO. At the same time this doesn't let Trump off the hook for any unofficial act. And for that matter, for any acts unrelated to the president's "conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. ".
-
Nailed it!
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2927188]Republicans and Democrats shouldn't be ecstatic or upset about the court decision. It's going to make it harder to prosecute a president for anything he does while in office that relates to his official duties, so there's less ability for one side to persecute an ex-president it doesn't like through the court system. That's better left to the ballot box, or perhaps the impeachment process IMHO. At the same time this doesn't let Trump off the hook for any unofficial act. And for that matter, for any acts unrelated to the president's "conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. ".[/QUOTE]This hits the nail on the head. All this drama and it being "a bad day for America". Give me a break. Presidents, and certain other officials, should have immunity for their official acts. Like you say, Trump isn't off the hook. It's just going to take a very long time to figure it out. That is, unless Trump wins. Then he will find ways to make much of it go away. And [B]that[/B] my friend [B]would[/B] be a bad day for America and the rest of the world.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2927188]Yes, if Republicans want to prosecute Obama for killing Americans with drones, or Biden for involuntary manslaughter for rapes and murders committed by illegals, they're now shit out of luck.[/QUOTE]No, a president is not allowed to violate the Constitution, and Obama violated the fourth amendment, The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
So a person has a right to be secure in their person.
In addition, you have the 8th amendment, Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. It is kind of hard to argue killing someone is not cruel.
So the real issue comes down to prosecutorial discretion. Will the prosecutor get a conviction? And it is that conviction good for society? Given what we know, I think Obama broke the law, but I am not sure you are going to get a conviction if you use the beyond a reasonable doubt standard.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2927188]It's going to make it harder to prosecute a president for anything he does while in office that relates to his official duties, so there's less ability for one side to persecute an ex-president it doesn't like through the court system. That's better left to the ballot box, or perhaps the impeachment process IMHO. At the same time this doesn't let Trump off the hook for any unofficial act. And for that matter, for any acts unrelated to the president's "conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. ".[/QUOTE]Well, given the impeachments, the idiocy of keeping Trump off the ballot, and now the bullshit trials in New York, the deep state and prosecutors needed to have a bright line drawn of what was and was not acceptable. The line had previously always been there until recently based on custom. Hopefully, now the Democrats will quit with this bullshit of beating Trump everywhere but the ballot box.
-
I blocked Elvis more than a year ago
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2927188]Yes, if Republicans want to prosecute Obama for killing Americans with drones, or Biden for involuntary manslaughter for rapes and murders committed by illegals, they're now shit out of luck.
Republicans and Democrats shouldn't be ecstatic or upset about the court decision. It's going to make it harder to prosecute a president for anything he does while in office that relates to his official duties, so there's less ability for one side to persecute an ex-president it doesn't like through the court system. That's better left to the ballot box, or perhaps the impeachment process IMHO. At the same time this doesn't let Trump off the hook for any unofficial act. And for that matter, for any acts unrelated to the president's "conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. ".[/QUOTE]Glad you answer his question. But he still does not have reading comprehension on more than just the headlines.
In my example, it is about A President targeting Justices by egging on cult members (by proxy), and then pardoned them for a crime he couldn't commit himself, sort of like a mob boss with Supreme Court blessings.
His example is a complex situation of US Citizens in a foreign country with close proximity to an armed conflict area, with bad actors that the CIA and Military have to assess and make decisions to protect the country (judgement call), and with the final approval from the president. In this case, the president (Obama, as well as previous administrations) did not wake up one morning and decided without any input to target a civilian. That's why the ACLU sued "the government", which at the time Obama was the head of, and not the President himself. As the file stated; al-aulaqi-v-panetta, since he was the Secretary of Defense. Subsequentially, it was dismissed on 4-4-2014. The decision by Judge ROSEMARY M. COLLYER is at the bottom of the article that I linked for anyone who is curious.
[URL]https://www.aclu.org/cases/al-aulaqi-v-panetta-constitutional-challenge-killing-three-us-citizens?redirect=targetedkillings[/URL]
-
LOL. Can you believe this? Why not?
Judge Marchan, the hand picked Democratic partisan hack, and now Alvin Bragg are squirming. After the SCOTUS ruling on presidential immunity, Trump's team filed a motion to dismiss the New York criminal case, and Bragg was fine with that motion being filed.
Then this so called Judge Merchan has vacated Donald Trump's July 11th sentencing date and will delay it until September 18th "if such is still necessary". When Trump issued payments to Cohen it was in 2017, but that had NOTHING to do with Trump's official duties being president.
However, now you have to define what the crime Trump supposedly committed and if it happened when he was president and if it was part of his presidential duties or not. Of course, they cannot do that because they never defined what the crime is. So now there is obvious grounds to throw the case out.
So Bragg and Merchan are going to use the SCOTUS ruling which really has zero to do with this case to worm their way out of sentencing Trump. Given that these two partisan asshats literally made up a law and used lawfare to try to rig a presidential election, I would put these two in jail for any made up crime for twenty years.
With Giuliani now being disbarred and Bannon being tossed in jail, there is not going to be any mercy like was shown with Hiliary. Fuck that! We Republicans need to pick out the worst of the worst and put these partisan dipshits like these two screaming "rule of law" away for a long, long time.
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2927200]Glad you answer his question. But he still does not have reading comprehension on more than just the headlines.
In my example, it is about A President targeting Justices by egging on cult members (by proxy), and then pardoned them for a crime he couldn't commit himself, sort of like a mob boss with Supreme Court blessings.
His example is a complex situation of US Citizens in a foreign country with close proximity to an armed conflict area, with bad actors that the CIA and Military have to assess and make decisions to protect the country (judgement call), and with the final approval from the president. In this case, the president (Obama, as well as previous administrations) did not wake up one morning and decided without any input to target a civilian. That's why the ACLU sued "the government", which at the time Obama was the head of, and not the President himself. As the file stated; al-aulaqi-v-panetta, since he was the Secretary of Defense. Subsequentially, it was dismissed on 4-4-2014. The decision by Judge ROSEMARY M. COLLYER is at the bottom of the article that I linked for anyone who is curious.
[URL]https://www.aclu.org/cases/al-aulaqi-v-panetta-constitutional-challenge-killing-three-us-citizens?redirect=targetedkillings[/URL][/QUOTE]Sotomayor's claim you repeated in your other post, that now the president can order Navy Seal Team 6 to take out a political rival, is hypothetical. It won't happen. She may be a supreme court justice, but I don't believe any president who did that would stay out of jail. Your situation, where a president eggs on supporters and they kill a Supreme Court justice, is hypothetical too. The Obama administration however actually did target Americans for extra-judicial killings. Good for the ACLU for taking up for the victims.
If esteemed board member Just TK and I were attorney generals, and if we were as aggressive as New York prosecutors about going after ex-presidents, we'd go after all of them, back to FDR at least. Certainly we'd throw Obama in jail for sanctioning the deaths of USA Citizens abroad. The Supreme Court decision protects ex-presidents from people like us, but who unlike us are in power.
Trump does deserve an ankle bracelet in my opinion. I don't think the Supreme Court decision will directly prevent him from getting one. Indirectly maybe, because this will further delay the Washington D. C. , Fulton County, Georgia and Florida cases. And if Trump is elected president, the two federal cases will go by the wayside, while Fulton County will have a snowball's chance in hell of enforcing judgement on the president. But if that happens, if Trump is elected, it was the will of the people. And I'm not sure that juries and judges should overrule the will of the people in this particular instance.
The press is preoccupied about what's going to happen if Trump is elected. You shouldn't worry. Trump's mostly bluster when he talks about retribution and the like, and American institutions, including the Supreme Court, wouldn't let him get away with it anyway. Just look what happened with all the election fraud cases filed by Giuliani et al in 2020 and 2021. Theoretically they could have gone to the Supreme Court and it could have ruled in Trump's favor. That didn't happen.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2927201]
So Bragg and Merchan are going to use the SCOTUS ruling which really has zero to do with this case to worm their way out of sentencing Trump. Given that these two partisan asshats literally made up a law and used lawfare to try to rig a presidential election, I would put these two in jail for any made up crime for twenty years..[/QUOTE]I wouldn't put them in jail, although they were dead wrong to go after Trump for covering up a one night stand and an affair. This was Bragg fulfilling a campaign promise, plain and simple. Trump was only prosecuted because he's unpopular in Manhattan. So what's next? Maybe some county in the deep red Texas Panhandle goes after Biden for channeling loans to his brother through his Delaware attorney? That would be fitting considering the involvement of Trump's attorney, Michael Cohen, in Bragg's prosecution.
-
I think the MAGA 6 just said President er I mean King Biden can, but
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2927160][B]What happened to "free speech" in this case[/B]?
I apologize Elvis. I did not google it. But do remember who said "Fuck the Police". It is still one of my favorite songs to this day. LOL! Caused a serious political uproar when it came out.
[URL]https://www.gq.com/story/nwa-fuck-the-police-live-detroit[/URL]
[B]I think the President should be able to pull straight mafia gangster moves. If the President of the United States feels like it is the interest of the country to put a hit out on someone, that someone better run like a ***** cause he going to get hit.[/b] President has to be as powerful of the Kings of the world. MBS said: Hit him. The kings men got it done.
Don't fuck with me about morality. It is cruel world. I accepted a long time ago that if someone in the real world wants you dead, and they do not care if they get caught. Friends in family will miss you terriblely and think of your often.[/QUOTE]I think the MAGA 6 just said President er I mean King Biden has total immunity to order a hit on a political rival.
Now, he can't make that arrangrment with the Mafia or your ordinary gun-for-hire hitman because interaction with them is not something a president er I mean King would do in his "official capacity" as President er I mean King. Therefore, that would be a "personal" matter.
Fortunately, interacting with the United States Navy SEALs is something the newly crowned by the MAGA 6, King Biden, would do in his "official capacity" as President er I mean King. See, that is a "President's thingy" er I mean a "King's thingy. ".
Therefore, ordering them to do it is ok, it is very, very likely no criminal charges would make it past legal arguments and the MAGA 6's final ruling on it.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2927170]Oh, why be shy? There is a video clip of Bernstein on CNN that you could have posted.
This is the one below, right? He reports 2nd hand comments from other people "also of numerous inexplicable moments" of Biden "losing his train of thought and can't pick it up again" that ought to be looked into, perhaps by a doctor. I agree.
BTW, Bernstein does not use the words "Cognitive impairment", "Cognitive incapacity" or even "Cognitive decline", the latter of which would be expected for anyone over the age of 50 and still would not disqualify them for the job of President.
See, I thought you were being shy about providing the actual link because, being the well-known fair and unbiased "Bothsider / Neithersider" here, you did not want to show off those admirable traits by including the OTHER things Bernstein said he has been hearing about Joe Biden from those exact same people referenced above and more:
That [B]"No question about it, I have known for two years", that Biden is "GREAT when you see him. SHARP. Has an ABSOLUTE COMMAND of the facts, as SHARP as can be"[/B] in his detailed briefings on Ukraine and other presidential level topics. ".
[B]Bernstein says sources suggest concerns about Biden have been growing for a year.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/01/politics/video/carl-bernstein-biden-performance-presidential-debate-ac360-digvid[/URL]
Oh, look! CNN must also be shy about mentioning any of those OTHER things Bernstein said about Biden in the big bold headlines or in the body of the text in that report.
Why didn't CNN or you do that? Why, like you, did they cover it up? Well, because CNN, the template for Mainstream Media cable news, is mostly biased to your side, we can only suppose.
Meanwhile, I presume NOBODY told Bernstein for all four years of Trump's horrific presidency how "sharp" Trump was and had "an absolute command of the facts" at any presidential level meeting any more than any CEO did at the meeting Trump spoke at recently:
[B]CEOs at Trump meeting: Ex-president meandering and doesnt know what hes talking about[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/14/ceos-at-trump-meeting-not-impressed.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
Interesting. It also appears NOBODY ever came out of a meeting with Joe Biden describing him as "meandering" and that he "didn't know what he is talking about. ".
Oh well.[/QUOTE]He actually said, "There is no question [b]I HAVE HEARD [/b]for two years how sharp Joe Biden is in his national security briefings..." Biden's people also told Bernstein the president has an absolute command of the facts and is sharp as he can be. However, in the first part of the video, Bernstein describes classic signs of dementia. There are two Bidens, the real, senile Biden. And the "Sharp-as-a-tack Biden" spun by his staff.
In other words, the video sounds like Biden's going senile and his staff is trying to cover it up. Or maybe the staff isn't spinning, and he's slipping in and out of reality. Either way, is this man equipped mentally to be president?
Yes, Trump often meanders and doesn't know what he's talking about. That's why I support Chase Oliver for president. If the major parties can't come up with better candidates than these two, I'll vote for the Libertarian.
-
The lead article in the New York Times today.
Biden's Lapses are Said to be Increasingly Common and Worrisome.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/us/politics/biden-lapses.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare[/URL]
-
It WAS a terrible day for America
[QUOTE=TheCane;2927195]This hits the nail on the head. All this drama and it being "a bad day for America". Give me a break. Presidents, and certain other officials, should have immunity for their official acts. Like you say, Trump isn't off the hook. It's just going to take a very long time to figure it out. That is, unless Trump wins. Then he will find ways to make much of it go away. And [B]that[/B] my friend [B]would[/B] be a bad day for America and the rest of the world.[/QUOTE]It's easy for presidents to have immunity for their official acts. Just don't do anything illegal and you have immunity. Why would any president need SCOTUS authorized immunity if they aren't into some nefarious shit? Presidents are not kings.
-
Showing classic signs of dementia
This was 3 months ago.
Maybe I missed it but did CNN have Carl Bernstein on in the past 3 months to discuss anything [B]HE HEARD[/B] about these obvious signs of dementia in Donald Trump?
[B]Trumps latest gaffe saw him forgetting New York Governor in rambling speech.[/B]
[URL]https://sg.news.yahoo.com/trump-latest-gaffe-saw-him-211326449.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAL3MyBR_rYrzTmh_f1UGFaVRI-cExPvIvcggnY2xdATx2cGUWicgKYhtvqTCoxtjyDyFoR351PVDIFKPkI4Vy0zg1GLHAnRspSly8lYJ4h-Jt-Ur6nzWNqIMNUakkIkKwZWLdoNL7H1T5ehHalQp5Dzm6SxwMKBaEvSqCX5GQcgc[/URL]
[B]Feeble, Confused And Tired: Donald Trump Torched After Bizarre Gaffe-Filled Appearance.[/B]
[URL]https://uk.news.yahoo.com/feeble-confused-tired-trump-torched-085918760.html[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2927240]He actually said, "There is no question [b]I HAVE HEARD [/b]for two years how sharp Joe Biden is in his national security briefings..." Biden's people also told Bernstein the president has an absolute command of the facts and is sharp as he can be. However, in the first part of the video, Bernstein describes classic signs of dementia. There are two Bidens, the real, senile Biden. And the "Sharp-as-a-tack Biden" spun by his staff.
In other words, the video sounds like Biden's going senile and his staff is trying to cover it up. Or maybe the staff isn't spinning, and he's slipping in and out of reality. Either way, is this man equipped mentally to be president?
Yes, Trump often meanders and doesn't know what he's talking about. That's why I support Chase Oliver for president. If the major parties can't come up with better candidates than these two, I'll vote for the Libertarian.[/QUOTE]Yes, but Bernstein said [B]"I HAVE HEARD"[/B] those glowing reports of Biden's sharpness and absolute command of the facts, which CNN did not mention in those big bold headlines or text of that report and neither did you until I cited it, from the same people who you took as gospel truth fact about the "inexplicable moments" [B]HE HEARD[/B] about to suit your and CNN's agenda. And he said he heard it from more than them.
You think those "inexplicable moments" that both Biden and Trump exhibit are classic signs of senility and dementia? Ok. But when people start coming out of important topic meetings with Biden commenting that he "meandered" and "didn't know what he was talking about" as has been case with Trump along with numerous video recorded examples of it for the past 9 years, I will start worrying about it with Biden.
Does telling 30,000+ lies in a handful of years including the firehose stream of lies at the Presidential Debate Quiz Show qualify as Trump "not knowing what he's talking about"?
I think so.
Meanwhile, even Biden's worst moment at that Quiz Show did not prove he "didn't know what he is talking about" but only momentarily verbally discombobulated while Trump's constant inaccurate statements about virtually every topic were in my mind clear signs that he "didn't know what he was talking about. " Or, fine, we can go with him simply being a pathological liar about everything if that makes you feel better.
BTW, that thing Bernstein [B]HEARD[/B] about Biden being at a fundraiser a year ago, suddenly freezing and needing a chair to finish the event sounded exactly like the nagging problem I had a few years ago with Sciatic Neuritis, where the sudden shooting pain traveling from my lower back down my leg was so severe it took my breath and voice away. It would happen out of nowhere, unrelated to any particular exercise or extraidinary physical event. It could and did happen if I just took in breath a certain way, took a step a certain way, reached for something in my coat pocket or made any number of ordinary moves.
And I damn well needed a chair to sit in ASAP. Sometimes the pain I experienced sitting in a chair was worse than standing up. There was often no position that would alleviate the pain enough to refocus on whatever else was happening at the moment.
In addition to which Biden's stiff gait has been well-documented and reported by his doctor and latest exams as a combination of fractures in his foot that he did not stay put long enough for them to heal normally along with arthritis in his back. And if there is a Sciatic Neuritis issue going on as well, I am even more impressed by what he is physically capable of doing.
We haven't heard about Trump's infamous bone spurs in a while. But I doubt that would have anything to do with him truly "not knowing what he is talking about" on every important topic for the past 9 years. And that is the only 1 Donald Trump I have been watching and listening to all that time.
-
Trump asked for the delay.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2927201]Judge Marchan, the hand picked Democratic partisan hack, and now Alvin Bragg are squirming. After the SCOTUS ruling on presidential immunity, Trump's team filed a motion to dismiss the New York criminal case, and Bragg was fine with that motion being filed.
[B]Then this so called Judge Merchan has vacated Donald Trump's July 11th sentencing date and will delay it until September 18th "if such is still necessary".[/b] When Trump issued payments to Cohen it was in 2017, but that had NOTHING to do with Trump's official duties being president.
However, now you have to define what the crime Trump supposedly committed and if it happened when he was president and if it was part of his presidential duties or not. Of course, they cannot do that because they never defined what the crime is. So now there is obvious grounds to throw the case out.
So Bragg and Merchan are going to use the SCOTUS ruling which really has zero to do with this case to worm their way out of sentencing Trump. Given that these two partisan asshats literally made up a law and used lawfare to try to rig a presidential election, I would put these two in jail for any made up crime for twenty years.
With Giuliani now being disbarred and Bannon being tossed in jail, there is not going to be any mercy like was shown with Hiliary. Fuck that! We Republicans need to pick out the worst of the worst and put these partisan dipshits like these two screaming "rule of law" away for a long, long time.[/QUOTE][B]New York v. Trump: Merchan delays sentencing hearing until September.
Merchan said Trump's sentencing has been delayed until Sept. 18[/B]
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-v-trump-merchan-agrees-delay-sentencing-september[/URL]
[QUOTE]Judge Juan Merchan has delayed former President Trump's sentencing in New York v. Trump until September, [b]following requests from the presumptive Republican nominee to do so[/b], and no opposition from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.[/QUOTE]Oh, BTW, there is this long understood political tradition regarding the general election calendar; it seems most voters aren't really paying much attention to the general election until after Labor Day, or possibly after the Conventions.
Uh, Labor Day is September 2nd this year. And Sept. 18 is also well after both the Repub and the Dem Conventions:
[B]Inside Intelligence: About That Kickoff to the Fall Elections...
For this weeks nonscientific survey of insiders in government and politics, we asked about Labor Day and the kickoff to the sprint to the November elections.[/B]
[URL]https://www.texastribune.org/2016/09/08/inside-intelligence-about-kickoff-fall-elections/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Nearly two-thirds of the insiders said the Labor Day holiday still serves its role of focusing attention on races, especially those down-ballot. About a third thought the conventions are the true kickoff to the general election season now.[/QUOTE]Now, I don't know if the 34 times convicted Felon for Conspiring to Commit Election Fraud in a scheme to "improperly influence" (steal) the 2016 presidential election, a big deal crime in New York State, was simply too ignorant about that long held understanding about the timing of the kick-off for most voters' attention in a general election or if he had been made aware of it but his Cognitive Incapacity left him frozen, left to meander aimlessly directly into an open manhole about it.
I'll leave that up to the armchair physicians' diagnoses here.
-
The Felon
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2927237]I wouldn't put them in jail, although they were dead wrong to go after Trump for covering up a one night stand and an affair. This was Bragg fulfilling a campaign promise, plain and simple. Trump was only prosecuted because he's unpopular in Manhattan. So what's next? Maybe some county in the deep red Texas Panhandle goes after Biden for channeling loans to his brother through his Delaware attorney? That would be fitting considering the involvement of Trump's attorney, Michael Cohen, in Bragg's prosecution.[/QUOTE]The law is the law, Trump is not above it, and he broke it to dupe the American people into voting him into the highest office in the land. The guy had gotten away with stuff all his professional life without being held accountable. Well no more! He better hope he wins. Because that's the only way most of his current legal troubles are going away. But don't you worry because you see [B]he is stupid[/B]. Which means he will find plenty more new piles of shit to step in. And it's so ironic too since he called everyone else stupid. What's alarming is how intelligent people who know he's stupid and a lying scumbag can turnaround and vote for him anyway. What did you say? He had a one night stand. The whole world knows that! And yet, he stands there and says, "I didn't have sex with a porn star". Yes he did, and we all know it.
It's a bald faced lie and everybody knows that. And we all know he's lying and acted in bad faith about stuff far worse than that. Felonious Chump needs to be held accountable for the wrongs he perpetrated against the United States, as President no less. And speaking of cases that should not have been brought, Hunter Biden should not have been prosecuted for the gun charge. Look at the facts and you find that other people in similar circumstances typically are not charged unless certain aggravating circumstances are also present in the case. Those aggravating circumstances were not present in his case. But he was prosecuted anyway because he's a Biden, and the Biden family has chosen to accept the adverse outcome, unlike the Trumps who act as if they should be held above the law for their own transgressions.
Note: I too have had sex with a porn star. Fucked her in the ass in my hotel room. The difference is that I did not lie about it and try to cover it up while also trying to get people to vote for me for President! Aaahahaha!
-
There we go!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2927145]As far as spiking the ball, why would I do that? You douches may think 2020 was the most fair election of all time, but we don't, and among one of the many reasons I think that is the Democratic primaries were rigged. But I am not spiking the football when I think you douches have the refs paid off.[/QUOTE]A 1,001 right wing conspiracy theories! And the only two possible outcomes in an election are that your piece of shit won or the election was stolen right? It can't possibly be that the other guy actually won. Talk about being a douche. You're as "douchey" as they come! But hey we're still here waiting. Waiting all the live long day for even a shred of evidence that the election was stolen. No, American democracy worked! And we're not about to allow a bunch of extremist turds from the right to turn America into some dictatorial shit hole country (remember that huh) like Iraq under Saddam Hussein who "consistently" got 90% of the vote. Right! That's the kind of America Trumpster turdsters would have. A shit hole America. Yeah? Well the rest of us aren't having it!
-
Serious questions
I hear the "Biden must quit" crowd repeating the same odd refrain:
1. Trump told lie after lie after lie.
2. Joe Biden did not call him out on those lies.
3. We need a candidate who will call Trump out on his lies and not let him just get away with it.
Questions:
Didn't these people watch the Presidential Debate Quiz Show?
Didn't they understand what the agreed upon ground rules were?
Uh, several of Joe Biden's responses began with some variation of "he's LYING", "Everything he just said was a LIE" and so on.
Uh, the ground rules were the Quiz Show contestants could NOT jump in, interrupt or talk over the other Contestant or his mic would be cut off. Which, if Biden had done what these critics appear to be wishing he had done, typically pro Repub Mainstream Media would be having a party showing video clips of an out-of-control, rule-flaunting, angry faced Joe Biden's mouth moving with no audio for it.
This was not the kind of Presidential Debate Quiz Show those critics apparently wish it had been; There was no open mic for both sides throughout.
There was a strict 2 minute limit with a strict 1 minute response time.
Sure, Biden could have spent the entire 3 minutes total allotted to him per question itemizing every 30-50 lies Trump told throughout, he's lying, he's lying, he's lying. But instead I counted and cited here several important policy proposals and plans for his 2nd term.
There was no cheering crowd, each side applauding an interruption and rewarding their guy for the loudest, funniest or craziest zinger.
The fact that Joe Biden kept the rules squarely in his mind, the mic cut-off issue and the time limits etc for every one of those 90 minutes, all while making it clear that he understood and was pointing out Trump's constant lying AND still putting on the record those popular 2nd term proposals and plans argues as much as anything that Biden, despite his cold and hoarse voice, was totally cognizant of the rules and parameters of that Quiz Show far better than his critics did.
I keep waiting for somebody on the typically pro Repub MSM to remind their audience of the exacting rules for that Quiz Show and how it was meant to calmly and unemotionally convey intelligent proposals and policy plans for a 2nd term, of which there were none from Trump, instead of one of those rousing, zinger-filled, crowd-cheering free-for-alls.
But 5-6 days later, nothing.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2927259]It's easy for presidents to have immunity for their official acts. Just don't do anything illegal and you have immunity. Why would any president need SCOTUS authorized immunity if they aren't into some nefarious shit? Presidents are not kings.[/QUOTE]LOL.
Bill Clinton lied to a grand jury.
Hiliary Clinton had top secret documents on a private server.
Barrack Obama killed an American citizen without a trial or due process.
Joe Biden kept top secret documents in his garage.
You have to go back to Jimmy Carter, the worst president in my lifetime, to find a Democratic president who may not have broken the law.
You are just so messed up in the head you think because Democratic presidents or candidates were not charged that they did not break the law when they sure as fuck did.
That is the problem with you Democratic douches. You keep saying rule of law when you mean rule of law only for Republicans.
I have already laid out that the average American breaks three laws a day and that you often cannot even see what the law is and how it often conflicts itself, and that has not sunk in yet. So let me ask you Xpartan, being a monger, why aren't you in jail? Are you going to tell me you have not broken any laws?
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2927266]This was 3 months ago.
Maybe I missed it but did CNN have Carl Bernstein on in the past 3 months to discuss anything [B]HE HEARD[/B] about these obvious signs of dementia in Donald Trump?
[B]Trumps latest gaffe saw him forgetting New York Governor in rambling speech.[/B]
[URL]https://sg.news.yahoo.com/trump-latest-gaffe-saw-him-211326449.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAL3MyBR_rYrzTmh_f1UGFaVRI-cExPvIvcggnY2xdATx2cGUWicgKYhtvqTCoxtjyDyFoR351PVDIFKPkI4Vy0zg1GLHAnRspSly8lYJ4h-Jt-Ur6nzWNqIMNUakkIkKwZWLdoNL7H1T5ehHalQp5Dzm6SxwMKBaEvSqCX5GQcgc[/URL]
[B]Feeble, Confused And Tired: Donald Trump Torched After Bizarre Gaffe-Filled Appearance.[/B]
[URL]https://uk.news.yahoo.com/feeble-confused-tired-trump-torched-085918760.html[/URL][/QUOTE]You can stop with the show now Tooms. The odds have changed dramatically. Kamala Harris is 3 X more likely to get the Democratic nomination than Biden is. In fact, in the last two hours, Kamala Harris has gone from dead even odds to 3:1 in favor that she will be the Democratic party nominee. Odds have gone from 50-50 to 3:1 in the last few hours.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/kamala-rising-harris-blows-past-competition-predictit-market-wagons-begin-circle[/URL]
So now Biden is doing something even you douches here cannot admit: he is fucking demented as hell.
As for Harris being the nominee, practically no one in the Democratic party wanted her. She was less popular than Biden was. So why Harris?
The issue has to do with money. The only person who can get all the funds raised at this point is Harris. Harris cannot get the money if Biden quits. He has to be declared incompetent. The excuse can be given then that people who donated to the Biden-Harris campaign knew that if something happened to Biden, Harris could step in. Any other person comes in and all the money Biden raised has to be sent back to donors.
Harris got less than 1% of the vote in 2016 when she ran for president then. She only got to be AG because she ran as a Democrat in California and Dems always win there. She was funded and backed by Willie Brown who was using tax payer money to pay to fuck her. Then she got to be VP by kissing Joe Biden's ass and has been a train wreck as VP. That is all she has done well politically, suck dick and kiss ass. LOL.
So now we got the disastrous debate and now Democrats are going to choose someone as their nominee not on popularity or performance or the ability to win elections. No, she will be the nominee totally because of money. You cannot make this shit up.
-
Excellent posts gentlemen. I don't have time to write much now but think you may find these links interesting, from predict. Org, a betting site.
Who will win the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination?
[URL]https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7057/Who-will-win-the-2024-Democratic-presidential-nomination[/URL]
As of the moment I wrote this, the punters were favoring Harris over Biden to be the nominee, but it's changing moment by moment.
And another one, who will win the 2024 US Presidential election?
[URL]https://www.predictit.org/markets/detail/7456/Who-will-win-the-2024-US-presidential-election[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2927318]A 1,001 right wing conspiracy theories! And the only two possible outcomes in an election are that your piece of shit won or the election was stolen right? It can't possibly be that the other guy actually won. Talk about being a douche. You're as "douchey" as they come! But hey we're still here waiting. Waiting all the live long day for even a shred of evidence that the election was stolen. No, American democracy worked! And we're not about to allow a bunch of extremist turds from the right to turn America into some dictatorial shit hole country (remember that huh) like Iraq under Saddam Hussein who "consistently" got 90% of the vote. Right! That's the kind of America Trumpster turdsters would have. A shit hole America. Yeah? Well the rest of us aren't having it![/QUOTE]You are engaged in conspiracy theory if you think there is no cheating in an election. The question is how much. 40,000 votes that are different and Trump wins. There are at least 100,000 ballots with only Biden's name on them and no one else's. How does anyone know if those ballots are real? How many other elections had 100,000 people voting only for president? I do not know if those ballots were legit, and neither do you.
You got Democrats in Detroit putting up poster boards so people could not see what was going on. In Atlanta, Republicans were kicked out of offices and told counting stopped when it was ongoing.
No one said there was no cheating. What was said was there was not SIGNIFICANT cheating.
But we Republicans even know where the worst cheating was likely going on: Atlanta, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Detroit, and Milwaukee.
And then you look at the black vote, and there were more black votes for Biden than Obama. Really?
I said at the time if Democrats cheated enough to win, it was the fault of Republicans for not stopping them. I said Republicans had to accept Biden as president even if we do not think he won, and protesting after the fact was futile.
You don't know how bad the cheating was in 2020, and your saying there was none is the kookiest conspiracy theory there is.
And when Dems try to keep Trump off the ballot, try to throw him in jail, ransack his home with a SWAT team, and impeach him twice for bullshit, you douches lose nearly all credibility. Why would anyone believe you douches did not rig the 2020 elections when you are rigging the 2024 election right now? Hell, your nominee is likely to be someone who did not win an election.
-
So you're answer is No, CNN did not have anyone on about that in the past 3 months
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2927377]You can stop with the show now Tooms. The odds have changed dramatically. Kamala Harris is 3 X more likely to get the Democratic nomination than Biden is. In fact, in the last two hours, Kamala Harris has gone from dead even odds to 3:1 in favor that she will be the Democratic party nominee. Odds have gone from 50-50 to 3:1 in the last few hours.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/kamala-rising-harris-blows-past-competition-predictit-market-wagons-begin-circle[/URL]
So now Biden is doing something even you douches here cannot admit: he is fucking demented as hell.
As for Harris being the nominee, practically no one in the Democratic party wanted her. She was less popular than Biden was. So why Harris?
The issue has to do with money. The only person who can get all the funds raised at this point is Harris. Harris cannot get the money if Biden quits. He has to be declared incompetent. The excuse can be given then that people who donated to the Biden-Harris campaign knew that if something happened to Biden, Harris could step in. Any other person comes in and all the money Biden raised has to be sent back to donors.
Harris got less than 1% of the vote in 2016 when she ran for president then. She only got to be AG because she ran as a Democrat in California and Dems always win there. She was funded and backed by Willie Brown who was using tax payer money to pay to fuck her. Then she got to be VP by kissing Joe Biden's ass and has been a train wreck as VP. That is all she has done well politically, suck dick and kiss ass. LOL.
So now we got the disastrous debate and now Democrats are going to choose someone as their nominee not on popularity or performance or the ability to win elections. No, she will be the nominee totally because of money. You cannot make this shit up.[/QUOTE]Thanks. I will take that as a confirmation that No, CNN did not have Carl Bernstein or anyone else of note on to report anything [B]THEY HEARD[/B] about Trump's alarming and increasing classic signs of senility and dementia over the past 3 months since those reports of it in lesser media outlets.
That's what I thought.
-
Elvis' perfect example of Trumpian Repub MAGA Gish Gallop in text.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2927415]You are engaged in conspiracy theory if you think there is no cheating in an election. The question is how much. 40,000 votes that are different and Trump wins. There are at least 100,000 ballots with only Biden's name on them and no one else's. How does anyone know if those ballots are real? How many other elections had 100,000 people voting only for president? I do not know if those ballots were legit, and neither do you.
You got Democrats in Detroit putting up poster boards so people could not see what was going on. In Atlanta, Republicans were kicked out of offices and told counting stopped when it was ongoing.
No one said there was no cheating. What was said was there was not SIGNIFICANT cheating.
But we Republicans even know where the worst cheating was likely going on: Atlanta, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Detroit, and Milwaukee.
And then you look at the black vote, and there were more black votes for Biden than Obama. Really?
I said at the time if Democrats cheated enough to win, it was the fault of Republicans for not stopping them. I said Republicans had to accept Biden as president even if we do not think he won, and protesting after the fact was futile.
You don't know how bad the cheating was in 2020, and your saying there was none is the kookiest conspiracy theory there is.
And when Dems try to keep Trump off the ballot, try to throw him in jail, ransack his home with a SWAT team, and impeach him twice for bullshit, you douches lose nearly all credibility. Why would anyone believe you douches did not rig the 2020 elections when you are rigging the 2024 election right now? Hell, your nominee is likely to be someone who did not win an election.[/QUOTE]Any one of the true pro America, pro democracy Patriots here could and has destroyed every one of Elvis' total BS points in that post, right?
But imagine being hit with that same firehose level of total BS in a live setting where you have 2 minutes to call out each lie for the lie it is, maybe another 1 minute of rebuttal but where the point and strict limitations of that live event is to also spend your allotted time citing your historic level of positive results accomplished AND your proposals and plans for the future! Truth and substance, not a crowd rousing circus of stupid zingers.
And you don't get to sit down and respond in text where you have plenty of time to consider and craft it. But live on national television in 2 minutes and a 1 minute rebuttal to a further firehose of Trumpian Repub MAGA BS as in Elvis' rant. LOL.
Thank you, Elvis, for providing the perfect example of how your Trumpian Repub MAGA's Gish Gallop rhetorical chnique works even in text form.
[B]Gish gallop:[/B]
[URL]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop[/URL]
-
A corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS...but what can KING Biden do?
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2927259][b]It WAS a terrible day for America[/b]
It's easy for presidents to have immunity for their official acts. Just don't do anything illegal and you have immunity. Why would any president need SCOTUS authorized immunity if they aren't into some nefarious shit? Presidents are not kings. [/QUOTE]
A Dark and Sadden Day Indeed! Especially, since SCOTUS no longer rules by law, but along conservative Repub partisan lines. Does the corrupt SCOTUS partisan ruling signify the last days of democracy?
Yes, the Trump Immunity Ruling on July 1st, 2024, while historic, is deeply troubling at the same time. I would venture to guess, perhaps even a pivotal moment in US history, where that Pandora's box (of US Rule by President vs. King), from [i][b]a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS[/b][/i], has plunged Americans on a path into the political abyss.
While some here are under the impression, a standing US president would NEVER say, Navy Seal Team Six, his political enemies, rivals or detractors of any stripe. They are sorely mistaken and only need to take a good look at, [b]the normalization of the J6 insurrection[/b]/attempted coup (something Americans thought would never happen) and all the right-wing despots all around the world doing just that, as their rivals mysteriously "fall out of windows". And don't forget "...absolute power, corrupts absolutely!"
PLEASE! Let us not forget either, that we're dealing with a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS. And it was always painfully clear, they have always had Trump's back and were never gonna let another Repub President, see jail-time or suffer The Rule of Law. Given that two (2) of the conservative judges (Thomas and Alito), had known direct and indirect ties to the J6 insurrection and never recused themselves, is very telling, indeed.
And while President Biden, may now have [i][b]"King like powers"[/b][/i], rest assured that may not translate as well, under a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS, where the rules of law, [b][i]"suddenly shift",[/i][/b] according to partisanship politics and who's in the White House. Meaning those [i]"King like powers"[/i] in all likelihood, would look, feel and convey something very different, than if say, a narcissist, lying, cheater, racist, fascist, dictatorial [b]"Project 2025"[/b] president were in office and a 2/3 conservative SCOTUS is presiding.
So I guess it's all down to the ballot-box (even as Repubs want to take this away from folks), as the last bastion of democracy?
-
The Repub MAGA 6 will always save the day!
[QUOTE=Spidy;2927513]A Dark and Sadden Day Indeed! Especially, since SCOTUS no longer rules by law, but along conservative Repub partisan lines. Does the corrupt SCOTUS partisan ruling signify the last days of democracy?
Yes, the Trump Immunity Ruling on July 1st, 2024, while historic, is deeply troubling at the same time. I would venture to guess, perhaps even a pivotal moment in US history, where that Pandora's box (of US Rule by President vs. King), from [i][b]a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS[/b][/i], has plunged Americans on a path into the political abyss.
While some here are under the impression, a standing US president would NEVER say, Navy Seal Team Six, his political enemies, rivals or detractors of any stripe. They are sorely mistaken and only need to take a good look at, [b]the normalization of the J6 insurrection[/b]/attempted coup (something Americans thought would never happen) and all the right-wing despots all around the world doing just that, as their rivals mysteriously "fall out of windows". And don't forget "...absolute power, corrupts absolutely!"
PLEASE! Let us not forget either, that we're dealing with a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS. And it was always painfully clear, they have always had Trump's back and were never gonna let another Repub President, see jail-time or suffer The Rule of Law. Given that two (2) of the conservative judges (Thomas and Alito), had known direct and indirect ties to the J6 insurrection and never recused themselves, is very telling, indeed.
And while President Biden, may now have [i][b]"King like powers"[/b][/i], rest assured that may not translate as well, under a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS, where the rules of law, [b][i]"suddenly shift",[/i][/b] according to partisanship politics and who's in the White House. Meaning those [i]"King like powers"[/i] in all likelihood, would look, feel and convey something very different, than if say, a narcissist, lying, cheater, racist, fascist, dictatorial [b]"Project 2025"[/b] president were in office and a 2/3 conservative SCOTUS is presiding.
So I guess it's all down to the ballot-box (even as Repubs want to take this away from folks), as the last bastion of democracy?[/QUOTE]As long as the King takes any silly threat of indictment all the way up to the Repub MAGA 6 in the SCOTUS for The Ultimate Ruling on it, it is 100% certain the King will prevail.
Now, I hope nobody is suggesting the highly principled, Federalist, Original-ist, non political Repub MAGA 6 would rule any question of criminality differently for, say, a King Biden vs a King Trump!
Or a King Gaetz.
Or a Queen Greene.
Perish the thought!
-
You want proof read this book
[QUOTE=TheCane;2927318]A 1,001 right wing conspiracy theories! And the only two possible outcomes in an election are that your piece of shit won or the election was stolen right? It can't possibly be that the other guy actually won. Talk about being a douche. You're as "douchey" as they come! But hey we're still here waiting. Waiting all the live long day for even a shred of evidence that the election was stolen. No, American democracy worked! And we're not about to allow a bunch of extremist turds from the right to turn America into some dictatorial shit hole country (remember that huh) like Iraq under Saddam Hussein who "consistently" got 90% of the vote. Right! That's the kind of America Trumpster turdsters would have. A shit hole America. Yeah? Well the rest of us aren't having it![/QUOTE][URL]https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/31/how-the-2020-election-was-rigged/[/URL]
-
1 photos
Response
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2927415]You are engaged in conspiracy theory if you think there is no cheating in an election. The question is how much. And then you look at the black vote, and there were more black votes for Biden than Obama. Really? You don't know how bad the cheating was in 2020, and your saying there was none is the kookiest conspiracy theory there is.[/QUOTE]Then prove it! That disbarred dolt Guiliani couldn't do it. But maybe you can then ay? Either put up or shut up with something that can stand up in a court of law, or for once and for all shut up! And stop blaming black folks for shit that anybody with a real brain knows you can't prove because it didn't happen. The ignorant, mean-spitited racism! Man! Reveal real facts that prove your allegations or bugger off bloke. If there were true facts that would hold water in a court of law you and your ilk for sure would have produced them already. But you can't because there aren't any. So you engage in this around and around "gish gallop" as Tooms puts it. Nobody except for other deranged Trumpster turdsters like yourself are buying your "bullshyit"! Oh wait a sec, wait a sec! We've paid off all the courts too haven't we? I forgot about that! Even if Trump appointed judges one after another ruled against him on this too. Got to be because "Democrat douches" paid them all off! LMAO LOLOLOL! You deranged, dangerous Trump sycophants are a piece of work. Do you think this is a game? I'll tell you what. Try storming the Capitol or any other violent act to topple the process in this country again and see what happens. You'll rue the day you ever out set to attack the seat of American democracy again. Believe this. This is not a game.
-
Immunity
[QUOTE=Spidy;2927513]A Dark and Sadden Day Indeed! Especially, since SCOTUS no longer rules by law, but along conservative Repub partisan lines. Does the corrupt SCOTUS partisan ruling signify the last days of democracy? Yes, the Trump Immunity Ruling on July 1st, 2024, while historic, is deeply troubling at the same time. I would venture to guess, perhaps even a pivotal moment in US history, where that Pandora's box (of US Rule by President vs. King), from [i][b]a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS[/b][/i], has plunged Americans on a path into the political abyss.[/QUOTE]Look man. You guys have got to stop being myopic and get real about this. Remember that one day there will be a Democratic President in office. And do you want lying, mean-spirited, assholes going after that person for everything they do while in office? Presidents, both Democratic and Republican, [B]need[/B] to have immunity for their [B]official[/B] acts. Otherwise, they will be hamstrung to do anything is office. We have a system of checks and balances and equal powers between the branches, and immunity for official presidential acts is a way to preserve that. Same with appointing judges for life. Otherwise, you have ex-Presidents being thrown in jail because somebody didn't like their policies or judges being jailed because somebody didn't like their rulings. Now [B]that[/B] would be a sad day for America. We may as be some place that's less than who we've been on this from our founding, like Brazil or some shit.
Now, you're damn right Trump needs to be held accountable! But not allowing immunity for officially performing the job is not the way. Again, remember that no immunity would apply to both Republican [B]and[/B] Democratic presidents. So, the question becomes what's an official act and what isn't? The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the lower courts to consider that question. Like Tiny said, Trump is nowhere off the hook. Think about it. When he took all of those classified documents to his house, he was no longer President of the United States. He was a private citizen. As such, in my view he was not acting in an official capacity. Which means he wasn't entitled to take all that stuff (even if he was classified info has to be properly handled which he didn't do). Of course, you know his lawyers will come up with all kinds of bullshit arguments about why it was in an official capacity, but the government will have all kinds of arguments for why it wasn't. It will all have to be litigated, and I think the government will win. The government has a pretty good record of kicking Trump's fat ass when things finally do get into court. He loses court cases on the merits again and again and again, including in civil court. Terrible client to represent!
In short, the sky is not falling because [B]Presidents[/B] (not just Trump) have been granted immunity for their official acts. The granting of immunity for certain types of officials acting in their official capacities in nothing new in American jurisprudence. And indeed, given the nature of man (mean-spirited, petty, vindictive you name it), it's a necessary tool to allow the system to function. Regarding Trump himself, I think some incredibly strong arguments can be made that he did plenty wrong that falls outside of an "official act". The absolute worst thing that can happen is if he wins again. Then he can just wipe stuff away. Seems so wrong! But, I'm a big believer that what goes around comes around. Which means that one way or another? He's going to get what he deserves! This is high stakes!
-
LOL. Total BS.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2927520][URL]https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/31/how-the-2020-election-was-rigged/[/URL][/QUOTE]From that ridiculous book:
[QUOTE]In 2020, progressives championed early voting and mail-in voting, knowing that Republicans preferred to vote in person on the day. To strengthen the case, progressives campaigned for all Americans to be locked down against COVID-19, contrary to the pan-Asian norm of locking down local hotspots. A general lockdown had the additional advantage of ruining the national economy, which had been booming, to Trumps credit. Further, lockdown prevented Trump from campaigning at his best (in person), and excused the stumbling, bumbling Biden from leaving his home.[/QUOTE]Now, how about some facts.
Gee, I didn't know so-called president Donald J. Trump was himself a school and business-closing "progressive". LOL.
[B]Trump denounces mail-in voting and again casts doubt on the election outcome.[/B]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/30/trump-mail-in-voting-423432[/URL]
[QUOTE]President Donald Trump railed against mail-in voting and unsubstantiated claims that ballots have been found in wastepaper baskets, even as former Vice President Joe Biden urged Americans to exercise their right to vote by any means necessary.
"There is fraud; they found them in creeks, they found them with the name Trump in a wastepaper basket, the president said during Tuesday nights debate. This will be a fraud like you have never seen.[/QUOTE][B]Government response updates: Trump issues stricter guidelines to stop virus spread.[/B]
[URL]https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/white-house-grapples-coronavirus-guidelines-markets-plummet/story?id=69620218[/URL]
[QUOTE]President Donald Trump and his coronavirus task force on Monday issued new, stricter guidelines to stop the spread of the disease, including that states with evidence of community transmission should close bars, restaurants and other indoor and outdoor venues where groups of people congregate.
The new nationwide guidelines also call on Americans to avoid gatherings of more than 10 people; avoid eating and drinking in bars, restaurants, and public food courts; and encouraging schooling from home across the country.[/QUOTE]Oh, and about that "booming economy" in 2019 thanks to Trump's brilliant economic policies and stewardship. LOL:
[B]U.S. manufacturing was in a mild recession during 2019, a sore spot for the economy.[/B]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/01/17/us-manufacturing-was-mild-recession-during-2019-sore-spot-economy/[/URL]
[QUOTE]U.S. manufacturing was in a mild recession for all of 2019, according to data released Friday by the Federal Reserve. The downturn is a sore spot in an otherwise healthy U.S. economy and a potential weakness for President Trump, who promised to bring back blue-collar jobs.[/QUOTE][B]The Verdict Is In: Farm Bankruptcies Up in 2019.[/B]
[URL]https://www.fb.org/market-intel/the-verdict-is-in-farm-bankruptcies-up-in-2019[/URL]
[QUOTE]While well below historical highs, Chapter 12 family farm bankruptcies in 2019 increased by nearly 20% from the previous year, according to recently released data from the USA Courts. Compared with figures from over the last decade, the 20% increase trails only 2010, the year following the Great Recession, when Chapter 12 bankruptcies rose 33%. [/QUOTE][URL]https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2020/article/job-market-remains-tight-in-2019-as-the-unemployment-rate-falls-to-its-lowest-level-since-1969.htm[/URL]
[QUOTE]The average monthly job gains of 178,000 in 2019 slowed slightly from the previous year (+193,000). [B]In percentage terms, 2019 experienced the weakest calendar-year job gain (+1. 4 percent) since 2010, when nonfarm employment grew by 0. 8 percent. The deceleration in employment growth in 2019 coincided with a deceleration in the growth of real gross domestic product,1 which slowed from 2. 9 percent in 2018 to 2. 3 in 2019.[/b] (See table 1.)[/QUOTE]And let us never forget that in 2019 Trump was still busy adding to his sterling economic, job creating and national security results legacy by laying the groundwork for Trump's Pandemic by defunding and removing the Early Warning / Pandemic Prevention teams from those Chinese labs against all dire expert warnings for him not to do something so dangerous and stupid.
Consequently, it is a delightful irony that one of the things that idiotic book blames for Trump losing so badly to Joe Biden is, you guessed it, Trump's Pandemic! Lolol.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2927487]Any one of the true pro America, pro democracy Patriots here could and has destroyed every one of Elvis' total BS points in that post, right?
But imagine being hit with that same firehose level of total BS in a live setting where you have 2 minutes to call out each lie for the lie it is, maybe another 1 minute of rebuttal but where the point and strict limitations of that live event is to also spend your allotted time citing your historic level of positive results accomplished AND your proposals and plans for the future! Truth and substance, not a crowd rousing circus of stupid zingers.
And you don't get to sit down and respond in text where you have plenty of time to consider and craft it. But live on national television in 2 minutes and a 1 minute rebuttal to a further firehose of Trumpian Repub MAGA BS as in Elvis' rant. LOL. ]
Thank you, Elvis, for providing the perfect example of how your Trumpian Repub MAGA's Gish Gallop rhetorical chnique works even in text form.[/QUOTE]I am going to have to start calling you Loony Tooms. You realize we are not in a TV debate right? That you have more than 2 minutes to respond?
And you are doing the Alinsky thing. Trump called out Biden for his being a liar. Trump did not have to win the debate. He just had to appear sane. And his two biggest blows were laughing off Biden's handicap and saying, "I do not know what he said, and I think he does not know what he said. ".
Biden took 9 days off while being paid by taxpayers to prep for the debate. Taxpayers should get a refund.
And the whole Biden is honest and Trump is a liar schtick is like Biden, it is getting very, very old.
-
Whomp whomp whomp
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2927331]I hear the "Biden must quit" crowd repeating the same odd refrain:
1. Trump told lie after lie after lie.
2. Joe Biden did not call him out on those lies.
3. We need a candidate who will call Trump out on his lies and not let him just get away with it.
Questions:
Didn't these people watch the Presidential Debate Quiz Show?
Didn't they understand what the agreed upon ground rules were?
Uh, several of Joe Biden's responses began with some variation of "he's LYING", "Everything he just said was a LIE" and so on.
Uh, the ground rules were the Quiz Show contestants could NOT jump in, interrupt or talk over the other Contestant or his mic would be cut off. Which, if Biden had done what these critics appear to be wishing he had done, typically pro Repub Mainstream Media would be having a party showing video clips of an out-of-control, rule-flaunting, angry faced Joe Biden's mouth moving with no audio for it.
This was not the kind of Presidential Debate Quiz Show those critics apparently wish it had been; There was no open mic for both sides throughout.
There was a strict 2 minute limit with a strict 1 minute response time.
Sure, Biden could have spent the entire 3 minutes total allotted to him per question itemizing every 30-50 lies Trump told throughout, he's lying, he's lying, he's lying. But instead I counted and cited here several important policy proposals and plans for his 2nd term.
There was no cheering crowd, each side applauding an interruption and rewarding their guy for the loudest, funniest or craziest zinger.
The fact that Joe Biden kept the rules squarely in his mind, the mic cut-off issue and the time limits etc for every one of those 90 minutes, all while making it clear that he understood and was pointing out Trump's constant lying AND still putting on the record those popular 2nd term proposals and plans argues as much as anything that Biden, despite his cold and hoarse voice, was totally cognizant of the rules and parameters of that Quiz Show far better than his critics did.
I keep waiting for somebody on the typically pro Repub MSM to remind their audience of the exacting rules for that Quiz Show and how it was meant to calmly and unemotionally convey intelligent proposals and policy plans for a 2nd term, of which there were none from Trump, instead of one of those rousing, zinger-filled, crowd-cheering free-for-alls.
But 5-6 days later, nothing.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/economist-cover-joe-biden/2024/07/04/id/1171280/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2927594]I am going to have to start calling you Loony Tooms. You realize we are not in a TV debate right? That you have more than 2 minutes to respond?
And you are doing the Alinsky thing. Trump called out Biden for his being a liar. Trump did not have to win the debate. He just had to appear sane. And his two biggest blows were laughing off Biden's handicap and saying, "I do not know what he said, and I think he does not know what he said. ".
Biden took 9 days off while being paid by taxpayers to prep for the debate. Taxpayers should get a refund.
And the whole Biden is honest and Trump is a liar schtick is like Biden, it is getting very, very old.[/QUOTE]Elvis, my man! You are spot on! I think I will call him Loony Tooms, too. He used to use Smoothie as a handle but things got all jumbled up or maybe too rough, apparently. Anyway all the dumbocrats on this board are freaking out now because their shit is hitting the fan. Even the media types so you know it is bad for them. I wonder when the dumb fuckers will finally realize that Biden and Company are responsible for the tanked economy, rise in crime and the whole woke thing. Bring it on, dumbocrats! Your days are numbered!
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2927562]Then prove it! That disbarred dolt Guiliani couldn't do it. But maybe you can then ay? Either put up or shut up with something that can stand up in a court of law, or for once and for all shut up! And stop blaming black folks for shit that anybody with a real brain knows you can't prove because it didn't happen.[/QUOTE]LOL. We got douches screaming all day about SCOTUS and now you have total faith in courts. You douches kill me!
A federal judge can always dismiss any case he does not want to hear by saying the person suing lacks standing, and that is what happened with all the court cases. The case has to be accepted by a judge before depositions begin so either you know this and are full of shit or you are ignorant.
So a judge has to grant the person filing suit has standing before any depositions are heard, and you cannot prove anything without depositions.
So in Georgia where they pulled out a bunch of ballot boxes from under tables after Republicans left, and a douche like you says, "The judges said it is fine" is lying.
My understanding was Georgia was actually the one state where Trump had the right to a trial with the right to depose. Like in the federal courts, the Georgia courts wormed out of hearing the cases even though they were legally required to do so.
The judges did not dismiss the election challenges then because they lacked merit, but you douches keep lying and say that was the reason.
And you are out of your fucking mind if you think there was no cheating in 2020.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2927569]Look man. You guys have got to stop being myopic and get real about this. Remember that one day there will be a Democratic President in office. And do you want lying, mean-spirited, assholes going after that person for everything they do while in office? Presidents, both Democratic and Republican, [B]need[/B] to have immunity for their [B]official[/B] acts. Otherwise, they will be hamstrung to do anything is office. We have a system of checks and balances and equal powers between the branches, and immunity for official presidential acts is a way to preserve that. Same with appointing judges for life. Otherwise, you have ex-Presidents being thrown in jail because somebody didn't like their policies or judges being jailed because somebody didn't like their rulings. Now [B]that[/B] would be a sad day for America. We may as be some place that's less than who we've been on this from our founding, like Brazil or some shit.
Now, you're damn right Trump needs to be held accountable! But not allowing immunity for officially performing the job is not the way. Again, remember that no immunity would apply to both Republican [B]and[/B] Democratic presidents. So, the question becomes what's an official act and what isn't? The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the lower courts to consider that question. Like Tiny said, Trump is nowhere off the hook. Think about it. When he took all of those classified documents to his house, he was no longer President of the United States. He was a private citizen. As such, in my view he was not acting in an official capacity. Which means he wasn't entitled to take all that stuff (even if he was classified info has to be properly handled which he didn't do). Of course, you know his lawyers will come up with all kinds of bullshit arguments about why it was in an official capacity, but the government will have all kinds of arguments for why it wasn't. It will all have to be litigated, and I think the government will win. The government has a pretty good record of kicking Trump's fat ass when things finally do get into court. He loses court cases on the merits again and again and again, including in civil court. Terrible client to represent!
In short, the sky is not falling because [B]Presidents[/B] (not just Trump) have been granted immunity for their official acts. The granting of immunity for certain types of officials acting in their official capacities in nothing new in American jurisprudence. And indeed, given the nature of man (mean-spirited, petty, vindictive you name it), it's a necessary tool to allow the system to function. Regarding Trump himself, I think some incredibly strong arguments can be made that he did plenty wrong that falls outside of an "official act". The absolute worst thing that can happen is if he wins again. Then he can just wipe stuff away. Seems so wrong! But, I'm a big believer that what goes around comes around. Which means that one way or another? He's going to get what he deserves! This is high stakes![/QUOTE]LOL. Cane, you keep making sensible posts like this and I am going to have to stop calling you douche. This was a shocker.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2927706]LOL. Cane, you keep making sensible posts like this and I am going to have to stop calling you douche. This was a shocker.[/QUOTE]Yes, agreed, he has. Likewise I'm going to stop calling him "My Partisan Democrat Friend" and start calling him "My Democrat Friend."
-
You must be blind if you can't see that this BS was designed for only one person.
[QUOTE=TheCane;2927569]Look man. You guys have got to stop being myopic and get real about this. Remember that one day there will be a Democratic President in office. And do you want lying, mean-spirited, assholes going after that person for everything they do while in office? Presidents, both Democratic and Republican, [B]need[/B] to have immunity for their [B]official[/B] acts. Otherwise, they will be hamstrung to do anything is office. [/QUOTE]Right. God only knows how this little pathetic country has managed to get anything done for 2+ centuries without a presidential immunity. Gee, that was close.
-
Hey, good for you! That was just a Trot, not a Gallop!
[QUOTE=DCups;2927700]Elvis, my man! You are spot on! I think I will call him Loony Tooms, too. He used to use Smoothie as a handle but things got all jumbled up or maybe too rough, apparently. Anyway all the dumbocrats on this board are freaking out now because their shit is hitting the fan. Even the media types so you know it is bad for them. I wonder when the dumb fuckers will finally realize that Biden and Company are responsible for the tanked economy, rise in crime and the whole woke thing. Bring it on, dumbocrats! Your days are numbered![/QUOTE]See, now short and sweet bursts of Repub MAGA lies like that are manageable. Thanks for keeping it at a Gish Trot instead of a Gish Gallop:
1. I have never had a user name on this site other than the one you see now.
2. The economy never tanked under either Obama-Biden or Biden-Harris. Both were astoundingly positive recoveries, expansions and jobs creation presidencies compared to the adjacent Repub administration.
Meaning, if you want to cite historic economic tanking, that would be the GW Bush economy and the Donald J. Trump economy. Don't even bother looking for a Dem economy for that over the past 100 years.
3. Crime is at decades' long lows under Biden after a couple of shocking upward spikes under Trump.
-
Corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS (aka. MAGA 6)....doesn't pass the smell test?
[QUOTE=The Cane;2927569]Look man. You guys have got to stop being myopic and get real about this. Remember that one day there will be a Democratic President in office. And do you want lying, mean-spirited, assholes going after that person for everything they do while in office? Presidents, both Democratic and Republican, [B]need[/B] to have immunity for their [B]official[/B] acts. Otherwise, they will be hamstrung to do anything is office. We have a system of checks and balances and equal powers between the branches, and immunity for official presidential acts is a way to preserve that. Same with appointing judges for life. Otherwise, you have ex-Presidents being thrown in jail because somebody didn't like their policies or judges being jailed because somebody didn't like their rulings. Now [B]that[/B] would be a sad day for America. We may as be some place that's less than who we've been on this from our founding, like Brazil or some shit.
...
In short, the sky is not falling because [B]Presidents[/B] (not just Trump) have been granted immunity for their official acts. The granting of immunity for certain types of officials acting in their official capacities in nothing new in American jurisprudence. And indeed, given the nature of man (mean-spirited, petty, vindictive you name it), it's a necessary tool to allow the system to function. Regarding Trump himself, I think some incredibly strong arguments can be made that he did plenty wrong that falls outside of an "official act". The absolute worst thing that can happen is if he wins again. Then he can just wipe stuff away. Seems so wrong! But, I'm a big believer that what goes around comes around. Which means that one way or another? He's going to get what he deserves! This is high stakes![/QUOTE]
Overall a good post on presidential immunity, much of it I've never disagreed with.
However, I think what your post failed to realize, state or mention, is the one distinction, [u]I clearly empathized[/u] in my post (see below and EihTooms' "tongue in cheek" post), was that, no matter which "KING" sits a top the throne at the White House, ultimately, said [i][b]"Kingly Powers"[/b] (aka. presidential immunity),[/i] won't be the same for a Dem vs. a Repub president, with a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS, that could and would preside and make these immunity decisions, as 2/3 conservative majority, for several decades to come.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2927513]...And while President Biden, may now have [i][b]"King like powers"[/b][/i], rest assured that may not translate as well, under a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS, where the rules of law, [b][i]"suddenly shift",[/i][/b] according to partisanship politics and who's in the White House. Meaning those [i]"King like powers"[/i] in all likelihood, would look, feel and convey something very different, than if say, a narcissist, lying, cheater, racist, fascist, dictatorial [b]"Project 2025"[/b] president were in office and a 2/3 conservative SCOTUS is presiding. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2927519]As long as the King takes any silly threat of indictment all the way up to the Repub MAGA 6 in the SCOTUS for The Ultimate Ruling on it, it is 100% certain the King will prevail.
Now, I hope nobody is suggesting the highly principled, Federalist, Original-ist, non political Repub MAGA 6 would rule any question of criminality differently for, say, a King Biden vs a King Trump!
Or a King Gaetz.
Or a Queen Greene.
Perish the thought![/QUOTE]
Look, while Repubs would have you think, this ruling is no big deal, [i][b]"nothing to see here"[/b][/i]...it is every bit a huge deal. Just like the far reaching implications, with the overturning of Roe v. Wade, by this very same corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS (aka. MAGA 6), the immunity ruling decision, comes with its own set of far reaching implications.
And while the sky may not be falling...today, let's not get blinded or lulled by Repub rhetoric, and not see [i][b]"the bigger picture"[/b][/i] at work here. Again, think the overturning of Roe v. Wade!
With a fascist conservative doctrine like [b]"Project 2025"[/b], that seek to chip-away at our democracy, equalities and freedoms, it is very easy to think, that this type of decision, [b][i]"equally"[/i][/b] enables and supports immunity for a Dem president, as it does for Repub president.
When in reality (IMHO) nothing could be further from the truth. So given the fact, we have a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS (aka. MAGA 6) and they would have the final say, on what they feel, is and isn't immunity, for a president (supposedly, no matter the party affiliation)...doesn't really past the smell test, for me.
-
Disagreements
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2927748]Yes, agreed, he has. Likewise I'm going to stop calling him "My Partisan Democrat Friend" and start calling him "My Democrat Friend."[/QUOTE]Well, it's better if we all can disagree without being disagreeable hahaha!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2927820]When in reality (IMHO) nothing could be further from the truth. So given the fact, we have a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS (aka. MAGA 6) and they would have the final say, on what they feel, is and isn't immunity, for a president (supposedly, no matter the party affiliation)...doesn't really past the smell test, for me.[/QUOTE]And this is why I call you guys douches. You have a fucking president in office right now who is a Democrat, and you douches are griping that presidents have immunity and how this is all about Trump. You cheer on a 100% democratic jury, Democratic judge, and Democratic the in fucking New York that is trying to make decisions for the whole country, and you gripe about 2/3 of a jury being Republican. Wah! You douches whine and say it is not fair.
You, Xpartan, and Tooms need to move to China or Russia where there is one party rule because that is what you want and is the only way you are going to be happy.
And where is your "rule of law" bullshit now? Oh, I see when the law does not favor you, you whine like stuck pigs.
And again, you do not understand how judges and courts operate. SCOTUS hears 1% of cases petitioned to them. When it comes time for SCOTUS to makes a ruling, it is like a teacher with a red pen that marks something wrong and sends it back to the lower courts. They are going to let the lower courts make decision on what is official and what is not unless it is outrageous.
But here we go again with you douches and your fucking lame stream media. The media was saying SCOTUS lets presidents do whatever they want so Biden should assassinate Trump. You douches read whatever you think hurts you and then whine about it being so unfair. You fucking douches literally tried to win this election in the courts and now you are whining that you did not get away with it.
How dare any court have a Republican majority versus being 100% Democrat!
-
[QUOTE=DCups;2927700]Elvis, my man! You are spot on! I wonder when the dumb fuckers will finally realize that Biden and Company are responsible for the tanked economy, rise in crime and the whole woke thing. Bring it on, dumbocrats! Your days are numbered![/QUOTE]Well, I admit it that Biden has been good for jobs creation and he had to be because now you have to work three jobs to pay your rent.
Seriously though, there has been no increase in jobs with native born Americans since 2018 and they are not distinguishing between part time and full time jobs. There is a huge discrepancy between unofficial and official surveys on employment.
And if you listen to Looney Tooms from Thailand, it is okay to go walking around East LA flashing cash. There is no crime under Biden.
As I am sure you know, half the cities are no longer reporting crime because there is so much of it they cannot keep up.
But if you listen to Loony Tooms, all those homeless folks are law abiding citizens. All that needle use is treatment for diabetes.
-
A chip off the ol' Trump "Gish Gallop daddy-block"
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2927487][b]Elvis' perfect example of Trumpian Repub MAGA Gish Gallop in text. [/b]
Any one of the true pro America, pro democracy Patriots here could and has destroyed every one of Elvis' total BS points in that post, right?
...
Thank you, Elvis, for providing the perfect example of how your Trumpian Repub MAGA's Gish Gallop rhetorical chnique works even in text form.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=The Cane;2927562]Then prove it! That disbarred dolt Guiliani couldn't do it. But maybe you can then ay? Either put up or shut up with something that can stand up in a court of law, or for once and for all shut up! ...
...If there were true facts that would hold water in a court of law you and your ilk for sure would have produced them already. But you can't because there aren't any. So you engage in this around and around [b]"gish gallop"[/b] as Tooms puts it... [/QUOTE]
I often love to the phase [i]"...great minds think a like, and weak minds seldom differ"[/i], knowing people will often lose sleep and struggle trying to figure out, of which "minds" they really are in the quote...but I digress.
Anywho, I couldn't help but fall outta my chair laughing when you both applied EihTooms' article on [i][b]"gish gallop"[/i][/b] to Elvis 2008, as that's who immediately came to mind (...kkkk!), when I initially read the article, that EihTooms posted (a few days ago), here:
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2927020]Everyone noticed the flurry of lies coming out of Trump's pie hole at the Presidential Debate Quiz Show. It was no different from what we have all been hearing coming out of his pie hole since 2015.
But at this quiz show he kept coming back to a few favorite Trump Big Lies regarding Immigration, crime, the economy under him vs Biden, etc. I suspect because, even though he knows his only way to survive the kind of "Trump policy" scrutiny the debate threatened to provide required him to use the [B]Gish Gallop[/B] technique, it was much easier for him to simply keep repeating a few favorite Trump Lies over and over again rather than come up with a variety of new ones for every question and response.
And, of course, he and his handlers knew that was an especially effective technique to use against a stutterer opponent. I also suspect he knows Biden will be much more prepared for it next time. If Trump is willing to risk a next time.
[B]What Is Gish Gallop and What Does It Have To Do With Thursdays Debate?[/B]
[URL]https://bearingdrift.com/2024/06/29/what-is-gish-gallop-and-what-does-it-have-to-do-with-thursdays-debate/[/URL][/QUOTE]
Earlier I wanted to post, that the [i][b]"Gish Gallop"[/i][/b] article, sounded [u]eerily similar to a tactic employed by[/u] our resident QAnon/MAGA conspiracist, INCEL and misogynist, Elvis 2008, but you guys beat me to the punch!
Well, one thing is definitely clear, the upstart "Gish Gallop" fledgling, is just a chip off the ol' Trump "Gish Gallop daddy-block" (....kkkk!)
-
The sky is not Falling. Agree
[QUOTE=TheCane;2927569]Look man. You guys have got to stop being myopic and get real about this. Remember that one day there will be a Democratic President in office. And do you want lying, mean-spirited, assholes going after that person for everything they do while in office? Presidents, both Democratic and Republican, [B]need[/B] to have immunity for their [B]official[/B] acts. Otherwise, they will be hamstrung to do anything is office. We have a system of checks and balances and equal powers between the branches, and immunity for official presidential acts is a way to preserve that. Same with appointing judges for life. Otherwise, you have ex-Presidents being thrown in jail because somebody didn't like their policies or judges being jailed because somebody didn't like their rulings. Now [B]that[/B] would be a sad day for America. We may as be some place that's less than who we've been on this from our founding, like Brazil or some shit.
Now, you're damn right Trump needs to be held accountable! But not allowing immunity for officially performing the job is not the way. Again, remember that no immunity would apply to both Republican [B]and[/B] Democratic presidents. So, the question becomes what's an official act and what isn't? The Supreme Court remanded the case back to the lower courts to consider that question. Like Tiny said, Trump is nowhere off the hook. Think about it. When he took all of those classified documents to his house, he was no longer President of the United States. He was a private citizen. As such, in my view he was not acting in an official capacity. Which means he wasn't entitled to take all that stuff (even if he was classified info has to be properly handled which he didn't do). Of course, you know his lawyers will come up with all kinds of bullshit arguments about why it was in an official capacity, but the government will have all kinds of arguments for why it wasn't. It will all have to be litigated, and I think the government will win. The government has a pretty good record of kicking Trump's fat ass when things finally do get into court. He loses court cases on the merits again and again and again, including in civil court. Terrible client to represent!
In short, the sky is not falling because [B]Presidents[/B] (not just Trump) have been granted immunity for their official acts. The granting of immunity for certain types of officials acting in their official capacities in nothing new in American jurisprudence. And indeed, given the nature of man (mean-spirited, petty, vindictive you name it), it's a necessary tool to allow the system to function. Regarding Trump himself, I think some incredibly strong arguments can be made that he did plenty wrong that falls outside of an "official act". The absolute worst thing that can happen is if he wins again. Then he can just wipe stuff away. Seems so wrong! But, I'm a big believer that what goes around comes around. Which means that one way or another? He's going to get what he deserves! This is high stakes![/QUOTE]While I agree with your assessment that it is not the end of the world with how the decision came about, I will say that it is a miss to not close the loop of future "legal' briberies and corruptions, and criminal deeds.
Also, the decision to remand back to district court to determine if the allegations are within the boundaries of official acts that took 90 days to determine is a collosal waste of time. This court seems to be scared of making tough decisions.
248 years of presidents not going anywhere near the criminal court system, and yet the office "needs" this in order to perform its duty. Thomas Jefferson's Louisiana purchase; Lincoln's civil war; FDR A-bomb drops; Iran-Contra debacle; GW Bush's Iraq war; yet this guy is the one that says, if the president doesn't have absolute immunity then no one will be able to do the job of the president.
-
Check!
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2927954]Also, the decision to remand back to district court to determine if the allegations are within the boundaries of official acts that took 90 days to determine is a collosal waste of time. This court seems to be scared of making tough decisions. 248 years of presidents not going anywhere near the criminal court system, and yet the office "needs" this in order to perform its duty. Thomas Jefferson's Louisiana purchase; Lincoln's civil war; FDR A-bomb drops; Iran-Contra debacle; GW Bush's Iraq war; yet this guy is the one that says, if the president doesn't have absolute immunity then no one will be able to do the job of the president.[/QUOTE]Correct, the court doesn't have the cajones to make hard decisions. And in case you haven't noticed. Things have changed over the 248 years you've mentioned. There's never been a Donald Trump before in our entire history! And so here and now is the inflection point where the issue must be addressed head on. Further, you also misstate what the court said. Nobody said a darn thing about "absolute immunity". It's immunity for [B]"official acts"[/B]. That's a critical distinction that must not be glossed over. And it isn't "me" who said it. The Supreme Court said it. I just happen to agree with them on this. Checkmate!
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2927954]While I agree with your assessment that it is not the end of the world with how the decision came about, I will say that it is a miss to not close the loop of future "legal' briberies and corruptions, and criminal deeds.
Also, the decision to remand back to district court to determine if the allegations are within the boundaries of official acts that took 90 days to determine is a collosal waste of time. This court seems to be scared of making tough decisions.
248 years of presidents not going anywhere near the criminal court system, and yet the office "needs" this in order to perform its duty. Thomas Jefferson's Louisiana purchase; Lincoln's civil war; FDR A-bomb drops; Iran-Contra debacle; GW Bush's Iraq war; yet this guy is the one that says, if the president doesn't have absolute immunity then no one will be able to do the job of the president.[/QUOTE]Misinformed, misguided fool!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2927940]I often love to the phase [i]"...great minds think a like, and weak minds seldom differ"[/i], knowing people will often lose sleep and struggle trying to figure out, of which "minds" they really are in the quote...but I digress.
Anywho, I couldn't help but fall outta my chair laughing when you both applied EihTooms' article on [i][b]"gish gallop"[/i][/b] to Elvis 2008, as that's who immediately came to mind (...kkkk!), when I initially read the article, that EihTooms posted (a few days ago), here
Earlier I wanted to post, that the [i][b]"Gish Gallop"[/i][/b] article, sounded [u]eerily similar to a tactic employed by[/u] our resident QAnon/MAGA conspiracist, INCEL and misogynist, Elvis 2008, but you guys beat me to the punch![/QUOTE]I almost fell out of my chair thinking you and Loony Tooms think you have great minds. You two are certainly in line for Electroconvulsive therapy. You two have that in common. To be fair, a more fair person like Tiny might say you, Tooms, and Xpartan are suffering from cognitive dissonance.
I must be like the great Carnac to read your mind when reading this story, [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/disney-heiress-halts-donations-democrats-until-biden-replaced[/URL].
Disney heiress Abigail Disney told CNBC on Thursday, July 4, that she plans to stop making political donations to the Democratic Party until President Biden withdraws from the presidential race. She is among a growing number of Democrat donors who are pausing donations until Biden steps aside.
Disney continued, "If Biden does not step down the Democrats will lose. Of that I am absolutely certain. The consequences for the loss will be genuinely dire. ".
Who is this woman? Blah, Blah, Blah. Zero Hedge sucks. Blah, blah, blah. Bothsider. Blah, blah, blah.
That is why I call you guys douches. You attack anything and anyone who interferes with your delusional view of the world. But wait, the article gets worse:
Later in the day, Biden showcased his plummeting mental acuity, even though leftist corporate media outlets and those in the White House lied to the nation for years about the president's cognitive capacities. On Philadelphia's WURD radio, the president called himself the first black woman to serve in the White House.
And there is audio and even more.
NEW: Hollywood Democratic megadonor Ari Emanuel torches President Joe Biden.
"I talked to a bunch of big donors, and they're moving all their money to Congress and the Senate. ".
"he gave us a bunch of malarkey, and I'm really pissed. We all should be really pissed. ".
"he is not the candidate anymore. This is a legal issue now. You can no longer remove him in three swing states: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. There's only one democratic congress. Michigan.
They have to vote to remove him. I don't believe the Republican party in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin will do that. And, if they do, it's then Kamala Harris. This is legal, so lawyers will have to look at this.
Now, there are some questions about whether the delegates can do something. The lifeblood of a campaign is money, and maybe the only way this gets solved is if the money starts drying up.
It's a legal issue now. But we're in fuck city.
End of link.
So is the problem me and Trump? Because I do not see either of those donors mentioning us. Or is the problem Biden and your ridiculous Democratic douchery where you cannot tell a lie from the truth? Biden is just fine.
Quit your whining and insults, grab your balls, and go put everything you own on Biden. It is four to one odds. If you really believed in him, this is the deal of a lifetime.
Of course, you will not do so because Soy Boy, you are a wimp. Why are you concerned so much about abortion? A man like you, and man may be an exaggeration, must be so concerned about others because someone with your testosterone levels could not impregnate a woman, but I could be wrong.
Man up, Soy Boy, put that money down on Biden and prove me wrong and quit your whiny little douche insults.
-
Thanks for the fantastic links for your side!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2927888]Well, I admit it that Biden has been good for jobs creation and he had to be because now you have to work three jobs to pay your rent.
Seriously though, there has been no increase in jobs with native born Americans since 2018 and they are not distinguishing between part time and full time jobs. There is a huge discrepancy between unofficial and official surveys on employment.
And if you listen to Looney Tooms from Thailand, it is okay to go walking around East LA flashing cash. There is no crime under Biden.
As I am sure you know, half the cities are no longer reporting crime because there is so much of it they cannot keep up.
But if you listen to Loony Tooms, all those homeless folks are law abiding citizens. All that needle use is treatment for diabetes.[/QUOTE]Those were fantastic links proving your side. Thanks for that. Oh. No links? No proof for your side? Oops. Nevermind.
How about this shaky source link:
[B]US violent crime decreased in 2023, continuing to reverse pandemic-era spike, FBI data shows.
March 20, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://fox59.com/news/politics/ap-politics/ap-us-violent-crime-decreased-in-2023-continuing-to-reverse-pandemic-era-spike-fbi-data-shows/[/URL]
[QUOTE]WASHINGTON (AP) New FBI statistics show overall violent crime in the U.S. dropped again last year, continuing a downward trend after a pandemic-era spike.
Murders dropped 13% in the last three months of 2023 compared with the same period the year before, according to FBI data released this week. Violent crime overall was down 6%.
Property crime also ticked downward about 3% in the nation as a whole, though in the Northeast and in large cities over a million people it increased by about the same amount.
The quarterly report released Tuesday is based on data sent to the FBI from about 80% of the law enforcement agencies in the country. Final detailed data for 2023 is expected to be released in the fall.
President Joe Biden said the drop in the murder rate was one of the steepest in the countrys history. [B]The $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, passed in 2021 by a Democratic-led Congress and signed by Biden, allowed cities and states to invest $15 billion on public safety,[/b] he said.
Attorney General Merrick Garland called the data encouraging and touted law enforcement efforts to target gangs, illegal guns and other issues.
The FBIs report was in line with the findings of the nonpartisan Council on Criminal Justice, which found that homicides were down an average of 10% in a survey of 32 cities over the year before, though it found violent crime still remained higher than before the coronavirus pandemic in many cities.
[B]Homicides showed a steep 29% increase in 2020, the largest one-year jump since the FBI began keeping records. The rise defied easy explanation, though experts said possible contributors included the massive disruption of the pandemic, gun violence, worries about the economy and intense stress.[/b]
......
[/QUOTE]Thanks, Joe.
And, in case you missed it, any reference to "Pandemic era" or "pre Pandemic" data means "during Trump's Pandemic" and "under Trump even before Trump created Trump's Pandemic. ".
No, I would not recommend walking through any large city flashing cash. Although you would probably be less likely to get your head bashed in by a Trump flagpole or an American flagpole, your eyes gouged, fingers smashed, maimed and killed by doing that than if you passed through a violent mob of Trump-incited America-hating Repub MAGA Insurrectionist "ordinary tourists" visiting the Capitol Building gift shop while wearing a police uniform.
And are you another one of those "the economy is tanking" loons?
Seriously, are you guys the ones pollsters contact who not only insist Trump and the Repubs are "better at handling the economy than Biden and the Dems" but also come up with the bewildering, nonsensical, breath-takingly ill-informed lies that The USA Stock Market is Down This Year and that The Unemployment Rate is at or near a 50 Year High when the reality is the exact opposite? Lolol.
Trump's Fed Chairman Appointment is TRYING to tank Biden's roaring economy, has been trying to tank it for the past 3 years and is having a hell of a time failing to do it with all the Fed tools at their disposal. The most they have been able to accomplish in that goal is finally getting the Unemployment Rate to tick up from below 4% to 4. 1%. Success!
[B]Record-Breaking Accomplishments On Jobs And Unemployment Under Biden.
June 7, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/richardmcgahey/2024/06/07/record-breaking-accomplishments-on-jobs-and-unemployment-under-biden/[/URL]
-
Old dogs and their tired old tricks and tropes!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2927769]See, now short and sweet bursts of Repub MAGA lies like that are manageable. Thanks for keeping it at a Gish Trot instead of a Gish Gallop:
1. I have never had a user name on this site other than the one you see now.
2. The economy never tanked under either Obama-Biden or Biden-Harris. Both were astoundingly positive recoveries, expansions and jobs creation presidencies compared to the adjacent Repub administration.
[b]Meaning, if you want to cite historic economic tanking,[/b] that would be the [b]GW Bush[/b] economy and the [b]Donald J. Trump[/b] economy. Don't even bother looking for a Dem economy for that over the past 100 years.
3. [b]Crime is at decades' long lows under Biden[/b] after a couple of shocking upward spikes under Trump.[/QUOTE]
Yes, quite right!
I applaud your due diligence in your response, but can you really teach an old (Repub) dog, to get new tricks? Or new tropes for that matter?
-
The genuinely dire consequences of a Repub potus suffering from senility and dementia
This must be evidence of the "genuinely dire consequences" that Disney lady has every reason to worry about if Trump wins a 2nd term:
[URL]https://youtu.be/gA_3AIdmmrs?si=65AhoUHyn5J8UjFZ[/URL]
Only someone suffering from senility and dementia could have that much trouble simply articulating what he reads from his notes or on a teleprompter.
As always, there is no Biden counterpart of that or any kind of serious cognitive impairment that is routinely exhibited by Trump.
-
So
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2927752]Right. God only knows how this little pathetic country has managed to get anything done for 2+ centuries without a presidential immunity. Gee, that was close.[/QUOTE]Let me get this straight. You think that if down the line another president invokes immunity for official acts, then the Supreme Court will say, "Sorry, that only applies to Donald Trump". That's not just being blind on your part. That's just plain ignorant! I'm no fan of this court, but that kind of thinking is just pure, adulterated, shortsighted, partisanship. As I responded to Checkmate, things don't remain static over time. Times are a changing, and the presence of Donald Trump forced some kind of decision on the matter. There was no Chump two centuries ago doing what he did! But here he is here now. The Supreme Court made the right decision on the matter. I just wish they had the cajones to say more about what's an "official act" and what isn't.
-
The previous post
[QUOTE=TheCane;2927960]Correct, the court doesn't have the cajones to make hard decisions. And in case you haven't noticed. Things have changed over the 248 years you've mentioned. There's never been a Donald Trump before in our entire history! And so here and now is the inflection point where the issue must be addressed head on. Further, you also misstate what the court said. Nobody said a darn thing about "absolute immunity". It's immunity for [B]"official acts"[/B]. That's a critical distinction that must not be glossed over. And it isn't "me" who said it. The Supreme Court said it. I just happen to agree with them on this. Checkmate![/QUOTE]
In the previous post, I laid out a situation that a president can ask a person or group to assassinated a federal officer or group and promised to pardon the individual or group, and according to this decision, that would be legal because PARDON power is in the constitution as an official act. Would this not be considered Absolute? What the court failed to do, in my opinion, is to confirm that NOT ALL official acts (criminal acts) are immuned. I didn't argue that official acts shouldn't be immuned. I said that it is unfortunate that they allowed this POSSIBILITY to exist into the future, and let the future courts relitigate this issue. That was a hard decision that they didn't want to make.
Unlike some, I may disagree with decisions made by the supreme court, but I will never say it is illegitimate.
-
Legislative role
[QUOTE=TheCane;2928134]Let me get this straight. You think that if down the line another president invokes immunity for official acts, then the Supreme Court will say, "Sorry, that only applies to Donald Trump". That's not just being blind on your part. That's just plain ignorant! I'm no fan of this court, but that kind of thinking is just pure, adulterated, shortsighted, partisanship. As I responded to Checkmate, things don't remain static over time. Times are a changing, and the presence of Donald Trump forced some kind of decision on the matter. There was no Chump two centuries ago doing what he did! But here he is here now. The Supreme Court made the right decision on the matter. I just wish they had the cajones to say more about what's an "official act" and what isn't.[/QUOTE]
Supreme Court doesn't or should't prescribe what is or isn't "official acts". It was left to the legislative branch to put in place the language, and interpretation up to the Supreme Court. Lower courts will do that and in many cases the Supreme Court (textualists) will say it doesn't say that in the Constitution, reversed. Unfortunately, legislative branch don't write enough laws to close out these loopholes within the law structure and we always get the same case over and over again relitigated.
In an ideal US, the SC would make a ruling that is against something not on the books, but majority want it. Legislative branch then create a new law to address that, and voila, problem solved.
Case in point: ROE V Wade deals with the 14th Amendment. So one court will say that 14th addresses this, and another does not. And back and forth we go. Easily addressed if legislative wanted to solve it, but they don't. It allows them to continue to debate this and make it a continual issue for their side to remain in power.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2927974]Those were fantastic links proving your side. Thanks for that. Oh. No links? No proof for your side? Oops. Nevermind.
How about this shaky source link:
[B]US violent crime decreased in 2023, continuing to reverse pandemic-era spike, FBI data shows.
March 20, 2024[/B] Thanks, Joe.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Spidy;2927982]Yes, quite right!
I applaud your due diligence in your response, but can you really teach an old (Repub) dog, to get new tricks? Or new tropes for that matter?
[/QUOTE]Yawn! Jesus, don't you two douches know by now I don't lie you two do?
[URL]https://www.nssf.org/articles/america-has-a-crime-reporting-problem/[/URL]#text=Tracking%20 crime%20 statistics%20%E2%80%93%20 and%20 more, crime%20 statistics%20 to%20 the%20 FBI.
Just 24 percent of New York's police departments sent their crime data to the FBI. That's a failing grade in anyone's book. That includes New York City's Police Department, along with neighboring Suffolk, Nassau and Westchester County police. Just 141 of the 583 New York police agencies reported data in 2022.
Pennsylvania was worse, with just nine percent of police departments reporting crime data to the FBI. Only 126 of the 1,392 police agencies reported their statistics. Missing were Pittsburgh, Allentown and Scranton.
Maryland police agencies reported just 38 percent of the time, with 65 of the 170 police departments failing to send the FBI crucial crime data. Departments surrounding Washington, the. See. , which has been plagued by crime, didn't submit any data, including Anne Arundel County and Howard County near Baltimore. Other surrounding communities including Montgomery County and Prince George's County submitted just two months of data.
California came in with just 49 percent less than half of police agencies sending crime statistics to the FBI. The Marshall Project reported that 44 states and the District of Columbia had higher reporting rates than California. Only 356 of the 721 police agencies in the Golden State submitted crime data to the FBI. Missing from that list were reports from the LOS Angeles Police Department, LOS Angeles County Sheriff's Office, San Fransisco, San Jose, Oakland, Riverside, Sacramento County Sheriff's Office and both the San Bernadino County Sheriff's Office and Police Department.
Illinois crime data submitted to the FBI in 2022 was only slightly better, with 52 percent of police agencies reporting. There, 464 of the 885 law enforcement agencies submitted data. Chicago's Police Department fully reported but neighboring Lake County Sheriff's Office and Du Page County Sheriff's Office didn't report any data. Cook County Sheriff's Office reported just one month's worth of data.
New Jersey tied Illinois for percentage of law enforcement agencies reporting data at 52 percent. Just 301 of the 574 law enforcement agencies sent the FBI crime data for 2022. Paterson, Woodbridge, Edison, Clifton, Trenton and Camden Police Departments didn't send the FBI any crime data in 2022.
To be fair, the worst was Florida, with just eight percent of law enforcement agencies reporting their 2022 crime data to the FBI. That represents only 49 of the 633 police agencies in the Sunshine State. Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, Orange County Sheriff's Office and Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office didn't report any crime data to the FBI that year. Neither did Orlando's Police Department or Fort Lauderdale Police Department.
And now you two losers will do the never mind thing and pretend you two are not lying losers who are full of shit.
Thanks Joe? Here we go again with Loony Tooms lecturing us on the condition of the USA from Thailand. You are as big a liar as Biden is.
I am still waiting for the picture of the casino stub where you two lying FOS losers put money on Biden.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2928053]This must be evidence of the "genuinely dire consequences" that Disney lady has every reason to worry about if Trump wins a 2nd term:
[URL]https://youtu.be/gA_3AIdmmrs?si=65AhoUHyn5J8UjFZ[/URL]
Only someone suffering from senility and dementia could have that much trouble simply articulating what he reads from his notes or on a teleprompter.
As always, there is no Biden counterpart of that or any kind of serious cognitive impairment that is routinely exhibited by Trump.[/QUOTE]LOL. Republicans had a legitimate primary. If we felt Trump were not there mentally, he would not have been voted in. You douches let billionaires pick who was the nominee and they freaked out when they had been lied to. So Biden owns all the delegates and there is no way out. That is what you get when you do not have primary elections. If Biden's mental status were properly disclosed, RFK Jr. Probably would have won the nomination.
There are not scores of donors backing out of funding Trump, and every poll looks better and better for Trump. Casino odds look great, and all you got is the Alinsky bullshit where you attack where you are weak. Biden may be old but have you seen how Trump looks?
And crime is down? Yeah, okay, Loony Tooms.
-
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2928163] It allows them to continue to debate this and make it a continual issue for their side to remain in power.[/QUOTE]LOL. Last I checked Biden is president and is a Democrat, so SCOTUS ruled for Biden? Unreal.
-
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2927752]Right. God only knows how this little pathetic country has managed to get anything done for 2+ centuries without a presidential immunity. Gee, that was close.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=CheckMate1;2928151]In the previous post, I laid out a situation that a president can ask a person or group to assassinated a federal officer or group and promised to pardon the individual or group, and according to this decision, that would be legal because PARDON power is in the constitution as an official act. Would this not be considered Absolute? What the court failed to do, in my opinion, is to confirm that NOT ALL official acts (criminal acts) are immuned. I didn't argue that official acts shouldn't be immuned. I said that it is unfortunate that they allowed this POSSIBILITY to exist into the future, and let the future courts relitigate this issue. That was a hard decision that they didn't want to make. Unlike some, I may disagree with decisions made by the supreme court, but I will never say it is illegitimate.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Spidy;2927820]Overall a good post on presidential immunity, much of it I've never disagreed with.
However, I think what your post failed to realize, state or mention, is the one distinction, [u]I clearly empathized[/u] in my post (see below and EihTooms' "tongue in cheek" post), was that, no matter which "KING" sits a top the throne at the White House, ultimately, said [i][b]"Kingly Powers"[/b] (aka. presidential immunity),[/i] won't be the same for a Dem vs. a Repub president, with a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS, that could and would preside and make these immunity decisions, as 2/3 conservative majority, for several decades to come.
Look, while Repubs would have you think, this ruling is no big deal, [i][b]"nothing to see here"[/b][/i]...it is every bit a huge deal. Just like the far reaching implications, with the overturning of Roe v. Wade, by this very same corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS (aka. MAGA 6), the immunity ruling decision, comes with its own set of far reaching implications.
And while the sky may not be falling...today, let's not get blinded or lulled by Repub rhetoric, and not see [i][b]"the bigger picture"[/b][/i] at work here. Again, think the overturning of Roe v. Wade!
With a fascist conservative doctrine like [b]"Project 2025"[/b], that seek to chip-away at our democracy, equalities and freedoms, it is very easy to think, that this type of decision, [b][i]"equally"[/i][/b] enables and supports immunity for a Dem president, as it does for Repub president.
When in reality (IMHO) nothing could be further from the truth. So given the fact, we have a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS (aka. MAGA 6) and they would have the final say, on what they feel, is and isn't immunity, for a president (supposedly, no matter the party affiliation)...doesn't really past the smell test, for me.[/QUOTE]
Another good post Cane:
[QUOTE=The Cane;2928134]Let me get this straight. You think that if down the line another president invokes immunity for official acts, then the Supreme Court will say, "Sorry, that only applies to Donald Trump". That's not just being blind on your part. That's just plain ignorant! I'm no fan of this court, but that kind of thinking is just pure, adulterated, shortsighted, partisanship. As I responded to Checkmate, things don't remain static over time. Times are a changing, and the presence of Donald Trump forced some kind of decision on the matter. There was no Chump two centuries ago doing what he did! But here he is here now. The Supreme Court made the right decision on the matter. I just wish they had the cajones to say more about what's an "official act" and what isn't.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2927970]To be fair, a more fair person like Tiny might say you, Tooms, and Xpartan are suffering from [b]cognitive dissonance[/b].[/QUOTE]
Gentlemen, The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board's reply today to your concerns is better than anything I've written. Here are some excerpts,
[b] The Supreme Court Restrains Trump
Far from empowering a dictator, the Justices limited executive power. And Trumps ability to prosecute Biden.[/b]
[i]Sometimes we have to marvel at the [b]cognitive dissonance of our progressive friends. [/b] (Tiny's note: I prefer Partisan Democrat Friends to progressive friends. Unless its Cane, who should be referred to as a Democrat Friend.)
They shout with alarm that the Supreme Courts decision this week on presidential immunity has removed all legal restraints on a future Trump Presidency. Then they lambaste the Court for curbing the power of the executive branch. Who's on first?
The Justices ruled in Trump v. U.S. that a President enjoys immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his core constitutional duties, and presumptive immunity for other official acts. But they also stressed that a President isnt shielded from prosecution for private actions. So Mr. Trump wouldn't be free to shoot someone on Fifth Avenue.
[b]The Court merely extended its Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) precedent, which shielded a President from civil liability for official acts in order to protect against the chilling effect such exposure might have on the carrying out of his responsibilities, as Chief Justice John Roberts wrote. This will protect every President from partisan prosecutors, including Mr. Biden.
Virtually every President is criticized for insufficiently enforcing some aspect of federal law (such as drug, gun, immigration, or environmental laws), the Chief writes. An enterprising prosecutor in a new administration may assert that a previous President violated that broad obstruction statute. Without immunity, such types of prosecutions of ex-Presidents could quickly become routine.
The Courts ruling will prevent a future Trump Justice Department from seeking retribution against Mr. Biden by prosecuting him for, say, obstructing immigration enforcement or forgiving student debt.[/b][/i]
Here's what the editorial says about overturning the Chevron decision,
[i]Progressives rightly fret that Loper could put other Biden rules in legal jeopardy for instance, the Securities and Exchange Commissions climate disclosures and Food and Drug Administrations classification of lab-developed tests as medical devices. Regulators will now have a harder time stretching laws to expand their power.
This includes future Trump regulators. Judges will have more leeway to block Trump immigration actions. And Trump appointees will have a harder time rewriting the law without Congressional legislation, such as regulating the proxy advisory duopoly. This is a check on willful presidential power.
The demise of Chevron could even empower Democrats in Congress since a future Trump Administration would have to negotiate with them to pass legislation. Most of the Trump agenda cant be enacted by a Republican majority through budget reconciliation.
Jarkesy limits the enforcement power of agencies and will make it harder to target opponents. The ruling requires agencies to bring enforcement actions that involve private rights (e.g., fraud) and seek penalties in federal courts rather than their own administrative tribunals where they almost always prevail.
This will constrain the National Labor Relations Board, Federal Trade Commission and SEC, which have used administrative tribunals to rubber-stamp charges. Agencies will have to persuade juries in federal court and be subject to more legal discovery, which will make them less likely to abuse their power.[/i]
[url]https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-donald-trump-presidency-immunity-administrative-state-joe-biden-3b7a0559?mod=opinion_lead_pos1[/url]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2928053]This must be evidence of the "genuinely dire consequences" that Disney lady has every reason to worry about if Trump wins a 2nd term:
[URL]https://youtu.be/gA_3AIdmmrs?si=65AhoUHyn5J8UjFZ[/URL]
Only someone suffering from senility and dementia could have that much trouble simply articulating what he reads from his notes or on a teleprompter.
As always, there is no Biden counterpart of that or any kind of serious cognitive impairment that is routinely exhibited by Trump.[/QUOTE]Haha! Good link Tooms, honestly.
Yes, no doubt if Trump wins the election, he may be in as sad of shape in 2029 when his second term ends as Biden is now.
In a closed meeting of the executive board, Elvis pointed out to me that there actually are some advantages to Trump's narcissism. Perhaps this is an example. If Trump follows the same path as Biden, then in 2028 he won't be all there. He's self confident enough though that he'll still call the shots to the extent that he can. Perhaps this means the federal government will be a little less effective than it would be otherwise, like when we have split government with both parties sharing power. That may mean the federal government has less opportunity to screw us over.
Biden on the other hand has shown he'll farm out policy to 30 something quasi socialists and neoconservatives. If Biden hadn't lost his mind, maybe he'd be more like the Senator Joe Biden of the 1980's, who worked to help pass the Reagan agenda. Unfortunately now he's just a figurehead.
-
2000 Repub MAGA 5; Sorry, this only applies to GW Bush
[QUOTE=TheCane;2928134]Let me get this straight. You think that if down the line another president invokes immunity for official acts, then the Supreme Court will say, "Sorry, that only applies to Donald Trump". That's not just being blind on your part. That's just plain ignorant! I'm no fan of this court, but that kind of thinking is just pure, adulterated, shortsighted, partisanship. As I responded to Checkmate, things don't remain static over time. Times are a changing, and the presence of Donald Trump forced some kind of decision on the matter. There was no Chump two centuries ago doing what he did! But here he is here now. The Supreme Court made the right decision on the matter. I just wish they had the cajones to say more about what's an "official act" and what isn't.[/QUOTE][B]Bush v. Gore[/B]
[URL]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore[/URL]
[QUOTE][b]Limitation "to present circumstances"[/b]
Some critics of the decision argue that the majority seemed to seek refuge from their own logic in the following sentence in the majority opinion: [b]"Our consideration is limited to the present circumstances, for the problem of equal protection in election processes generally presents many complexities." [/b]The Court's defenders argued that this was a reasonable precaution against the possibility that the decision might be read too broadly,arguing that in the short time available it would be inappropriate to attempt to craft language spelling out in greater detail how to apply the holding to other cases, [b]stating that the case did not set precedent in any way and could not be used to justify any future court decision, and some suggested that this was evidence the majority realized its holding was untenable.[/b] Regardless of whether the majority intended the decision to be precedential, several federal courts have cited it in election cases, as did a lawyer for a Republican congressional candidate during legal arguments coincident with the 2020 United States presidential election.
.........
Harvard University law professor Alan Dershowitz writes:
"The decision in the Florida election case may be ranked as the single most corrupt decision in Supreme Court history, because it is the only one that I know of where the majority justices decided as they did because of the personal identity and political affiliation of the litigants. This was cheating, and a violation of the judicial oath."[/QUOTE]A Repub MAGA 5+ has shown they are perfectly capable of blah blah blah-ing their way into a one-time-only carve out to benefit a fellow Repub MAGA whenever necessary in order to ensure typically historically disastrous across-the-board Repub economic, national security and now Constitutional results.
-
The Art of the Gish Gallop
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2927487]
Thank you, Elvis, for providing the perfect example of how your Trumpian Repub MAGA's Gish Gallop rhetorical chnique works even in text form.
[B]Gish gallop:[/B]
[URL]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2927769]See, now short and sweet bursts of Repub MAGA lies like that are manageable. Thanks for keeping it at a Gish Trot instead of a Gish Gallop:[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=TheCane;2927562] But you can't because there aren't any. So you engage in this around and around "gish gallop" as Tooms puts it. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Spidy;2927940]I often love to the phase [i]"...great minds think a like, and weak minds seldom differ"[/i], knowing people will often lose sleep and struggle trying to figure out, of which "minds" they really are in the quote...but I digress.
Anywho, I couldn't help but fall outta my chair laughing when you both applied EihTooms' article on [i][b]"gish gallop"[/i][/b] to Elvis 2008, as that's who immediately came to mind (...kkkk!), when I initially read the article, that EihTooms posted (a few days ago), here:
Earlier I wanted to post, that the [i][b]"Gish Gallop"[/i][/b] article, sounded [u]eerily similar to a tactic employed by[/u] our resident QAnon/MAGA conspiracist, INCEL and misogynist, Elvis 2008, but you guys beat me to the punch!
Well, one thing is definitely clear, the upstart "Gish Gallop" fledgling, is just a chip off the ol' Trump "Gish Gallop daddy-block" (....kkkk!)[/QUOTE]Elvis doesn't Gish Gallop. He thinks out of the box. Trump does, but he's not an effective practitioner of the art because his misrepresentations are so ridiculous. As Sidney Powell's lawyers argued in Dominion Voting System's defamation case against her, many of Trump's lies are so ridiculous or so hyperbolic that no one takes them seriously.
So who's good at this? Well, Tooms could write a book, "The Art of the Gish Gallop. " His body of work about Republican Presidents and the economy is impressive. His recent arguments about how badly the economy fared in 2019, during the Trump presidency, was a Masterpiece of Gish Gallop. He's also effective at countering Gish Gallup. As he did when I attempted to engage in the art, to show that Democrat presidents are bloodthirsty because they sacrificed many more young American lives in foreign wars than did Republican presidents.
Thanks for teaching us a new word Tooms! And for teaching us how to use it! Just like The Donald created Trump University to teach about real estate, perhaps you should start Tooms University to teach Gish Gallop. Just make sure you actually teach people something or you may get sued like Trump.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2927970]I almost fell out of my chair thinking you and Loony Tooms think you have great minds. You two are certainly in line for Electroconvulsive therapy. You two have that in common. To be fair, a more fair person like Tiny might say you, Tooms, and Xpartan are suffering from cognitive dissonance.
I must be like the great Carnac to read your mind when reading this story, [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/disney-heiress-halts-donations-democrats-until-biden-replaced[/URL].
Disney heiress Abigail Disney told CNBC on Thursday, July 4, that she plans to stop making political donations to the Democratic Party until President Biden withdraws from the presidential race. She is among a growing number of Democrat donors who are pausing donations until Biden steps aside.
Disney continued, "If Biden does not step down the Democrats will lose. Of that I am absolutely certain. The consequences for the loss will be genuinely dire. ".
Who is this woman? Blah, Blah, Blah. Zero Hedge sucks. Blah, blah, blah. Bothsider. Blah, blah, blah.
That is why I call you guys douches. You attack anything and anyone who interferes with your delusional view of the world. But wait, the article gets worse:
Later in the day, Biden showcased his plummeting mental acuity, even though leftist corporate media outlets and those in the White House lied to the nation for years about the president's cognitive capacities. On Philadelphia's WURD radio, the president called himself the first black woman to serve in the White House.
And there is audio and even more.
NEW: Hollywood Democratic megadonor Ari Emanuel torches President Joe Biden.
"I talked to a bunch of big donors, and they're moving all their money to Congress and the Senate. ".
"he gave us a bunch of malarkey, and I'm really pissed. We all should be really pissed. ".
"he is not the candidate anymore. This is a legal issue now. You can no longer remove him in three swing states: Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. There's only one democratic congress. Michigan.
They have to vote to remove him. I don't believe the Republican party in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin will do that. And, if they do, it's then Kamala Harris. This is legal, so lawyers will have to look at this.
Now, there are some questions about whether the delegates can do something. The lifeblood of a campaign is money, and maybe the only way this gets solved is if the money starts drying up.
It's a legal issue now. But we're in fuck city.
End of link.
So is the problem me and Trump? Because I do not see either of those donors mentioning us. Or is the problem Biden and your ridiculous Democratic douchery where you cannot tell a lie from the truth? Biden is just fine.
Quit your whining and insults, grab your balls, and go put everything you own on Biden. It is four to one odds. If you really believed in him, this is the deal of a lifetime.
Of course, you will not do so because Soy Boy, you are a wimp. Why are you concerned so much about abortion? A man like you, and man may be an exaggeration, must be so concerned about others because someone with your testosterone levels could not impregnate a woman, but I could be wrong.
Man up, Soy Boy, put that money down on Biden and prove me wrong and quit your whiny little douche insults.[/QUOTE]Abigail Disney is a piker. Tooms' real estate and mutual fund empire may be worth more than everything she's got. Her contributions to the Democratic Party will not be missed. They were a drop in the bucket.
Furthermore, she hasn't really done anything in her life except sit on her fat ass and support questionable causes. I don't like that, and it's partly why, unlike you, I don't like RFK, Jr. He's from the same mold, except he's not fat. I'm not sure what he's done besides living off of his Grand Daddy's money.
-
Well. That didn't last long.
[B]Biden narrows Trumps lead in swing states after debate debacle: Survey.
July 6, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4757918-joe-biden-donald-trump-swing-states-bloomberg-morning-consult-survey/[/URL]
[QUOTE]President Biden, the wake of a poor debate performance and growing calls for him to step aside, has narrowed Trumps lead in the key swing states, according to a new survey.
The Bloomberg/Morning Consult poll, published Saturday, showed Biden leading Trump in Michigan and Wisconsin. In Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and North Carolina, the incumbent is now within the margin of error per the survey.
Overall, the poll found that Trump is leading Biden by only 2 percentage points across the seven states 47 percent to 45 percent. This is the closest Biden has been to overtaking Trump since Bloomberg started tracking the seven states last October.
The poll also showed Biden narrowed the gap with independent voters, with Trump and Biden being tied at 40 percent. In a previous poll, the former president led the incumbent 44 percent to 36 percent.
The widest gap between the presumptive party nominees came from the battleground state of Pennsylvania, Bidens home turf. The survey shows Trump received 51 percent of support from Keystone State voters, compared to Bidens 44 percent.
This was Bloombergs first poll after the June 28 debate, which was hosted by CNN moderators Jake Tapper and Dana Bash. The presidents lackluster performance on stage where he stumbled over his words and had a raspy voice has raised concerns among Democrats about his ability to beat Trump in November or serve as president for another four years.
While the first 2024 presidential debate appeared to alarm some Democratic leaders, our surveys of swing-state for Bloomberg News show the matter has done little to change the underlying dynamics of the contest, Morning Consult US political consultant Eli Yokley wrote alongside the poll release.[/QUOTE]Additionally, RCP, 270 to Win and 538's No Toss-Up States EV Maps remain unchanged with the latter showing Biden now only behind Trump by a fraction of 1 percentage point in 2 of the 3 battleground states he needs to clinch 270 Electoral Votes, Wisconsin and Michegan, in the Consensus of Polls. Only Pennsylvania showing Biden behind Trump by as much as 3 points.
But that can be easily remedied by Biden if he campaigns there several more times in the next 3-4 months. At which point it will come down to Ground Game in PA as it likely would be today re WI and MI.
Clearly, many if not most poll respondents have not fallen for Mainstream Media's rush to aid Trump and his fellow Repubs' "confirmation bias" regarding Biden's obvious lack of cognitive impairment by his truthful and pertinent responses to the Presidential Debate Quiz Show questions vs Trump's pathetic evasion and repetition of outrageous lies.
So too will they not fall for that typically pro Repub MSM tactic with regard to Biden's 25 minute interview on ABC, where he had zero problem fully comprehending every word and subtexual implication of wily George Stephanopoulus' questions and had zero problem answering each one fully, completely and with facts, figures and data on his side. Something Trump has not only failed to do with any interview ever but he has gone into hiding to avoid showing up on the same show to face similar questions.
Biden's only evasion was, of course, a proper one; he is not about to set a precedent where presidential candidates are given cognitive tests. Ridiculous request. Besides, there are already 2 voluntary demands of presidential candidates to strengthen confidence in their determination to serve; submit their tax returns for the previous several years and disassociate themselves with any ongoing commercial business or investments, BOTH of which Trump failed to do.
The only difference between the perfectly lucid and cognitively competent Joe Biden of 4 or 15 years ago is he gets short of breath easier and his voice can sound tired.
No surprise considering this is now his 2nd time at work in the Executive Branch cleaning up the horrific mess of everything left behind by the outgoing Repub. That is exhausting. Not like the years of riding ponies, clearing brush down at the ranch and constant golfing incoming Repubs taking over from outgoing Dems can always enjoy.
-
Oh, so you finally dug up a link?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2928171]Yawn! Jesus, don't you two douches know by now I don't lie you two do?
[URL]https://www.nssf.org/articles/america-has-a-crime-reporting-problem/[/URL]#text=Tracking%20 crime%20 statistics%20%E2%80%93%20 and%20 more, crime%20 statistics%20 to%20 the%20 FBI.
Just 24 percent of New York's police departments sent their crime data to the FBI. That's a failing grade in anyone's book. That includes New York City's Police Department, along with neighboring Suffolk, Nassau and Westchester County police. Just 141 of the 583 New York police agencies reported data in 2022.
Pennsylvania was worse, with just nine percent of police departments reporting crime data to the FBI. Only 126 of the 1,392 police agencies reported their statistics. Missing were Pittsburgh, Allentown and Scranton.
Maryland police agencies reported just 38 percent of the time, with 65 of the 170 police departments failing to send the FBI crucial crime data. Departments surrounding Washington, the. See. , which has been plagued by crime, didn't submit any data, including Anne Arundel County and Howard County near Baltimore. Other surrounding communities including Montgomery County and Prince George's County submitted just two months of data.
California came in with just 49 percent less than half of police agencies sending crime statistics to the FBI. The Marshall Project reported that 44 states and the District of Columbia had higher reporting rates than California. Only 356 of the 721 police agencies in the Golden State submitted crime data to the FBI. Missing from that list were reports from the LOS Angeles Police Department, LOS Angeles County Sheriff's Office, San Fransisco, San Jose, Oakland, Riverside, Sacramento County Sheriff's Office and both the San Bernadino County Sheriff's Office and Police Department.
Illinois crime data submitted to the FBI in 2022 was only slightly better, with 52 percent of police agencies reporting. There, 464 of the 885 law enforcement agencies submitted data. Chicago's Police Department fully reported but neighboring Lake County Sheriff's Office and Du Page County Sheriff's Office didn't report any data. Cook County Sheriff's Office reported just one month's worth of data.
New Jersey tied Illinois for percentage of law enforcement agencies reporting data at 52 percent. Just 301 of the 574 law enforcement agencies sent the FBI crime data for 2022. Paterson, Woodbridge, Edison, Clifton, Trenton and Camden Police Departments didn't send the FBI any crime data in 2022.
To be fair, the worst was Florida, with just eight percent of law enforcement agencies reporting their 2022 crime data to the FBI. That represents only 49 of the 633 police agencies in the Sunshine State. Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, Orange County Sheriff's Office and Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office didn't report any crime data to the FBI that year. Neither did Orlando's Police Department or Fort Lauderdale Police Department.
And now you two losers will do the never mind thing and pretend you two are not lying losers who are full of shit.
Thanks Joe? Here we go again with Loony Tooms lecturing us on the condition of the USA from Thailand. You are as big a liar as Biden is.
I am still waiting for the picture of the casino stub where you two lying FOS losers put money on Biden.[/QUOTE]LOL. My link was Fox News and you rejected it? Are you with numbskull mentally deranged Trump now in slamming Trump Media Central?
Your link was from a firearm association that I am sure is recommending every terrified American buy and hoard a dozen semi-automatic weapons to protect themselves from murderous woke drag queens.
-
I believe this was written for you
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2928207]Abigail Disney is a piker. Tooms' real estate and mutual fund empire may be worth more than everything she's got. Her contributions to the Democratic Party will not be missed. They were a drop in the bucket.
Furthermore, she hasn't really done anything in her life except sit on her fat ass and support questionable causes. I don't like that, and it's partly why, unlike you, I don't like RFK, Jr. He's from the same mold, except he's not fat. I'm not sure what he's done besides living off of his Grand Daddy's money.[/QUOTE]I've been reading the NYT since the 80's, this is clearly the best article I've ever seen them publish, it alone will have made this years subscription worth it.
And to think this great man once worked for the evil turd Romney, Allahu Akbar.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/06/opinion/populism-power-elites-politics.html[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2928134]Let me get this straight. You think that if down the line another president invokes immunity for official acts, then the Supreme Court will say, "Sorry, that only applies to Donald Trump". That's not just being blind on your part. That's just plain ignorant! I'm no fan of this court, but that kind of thinking is just pure, adulterated, shortsighted, partisanship. As I responded to Checkmate, things don't remain static over time. Times are a changing, and the presence of Donald Trump forced some kind of decision on the matter. There was no Chump two centuries ago doing what he did! But here he is here now. The Supreme Court made the right decision on the matter. I just wish they had the cajones to say more about what's an "official act" and what isn't.[/QUOTE]Well, let me help you get it straight.
We're talking about the man who called for his supporters to attack the Capitol, who called brutal Putin's invasion of a another country "genius", who pledged -- if elected -- to go after his political enemies. This is the man, I'll remind you, who flooded the legal system with 60+ bogus lawsuits with zero merits, and now the highest court in the land is giving him a legal leg up? Really?
Tell you what. I don't care about "down the line". I'm not even sure that we'll still have the "down the line" if that fascist POS gets the second term. But if you believe that this lifeline thrown by 6 partisan judges was designed for some mythical "down-the-line" rather than to benefit THIS particular aforementioned fascist piece of shit, then I have a dozen of London bridges with all the trimmings to sell you for next to nothing.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2928209]
The only difference between the perfectly lucid and cognitively competent Joe Biden of 4 or 15 years ago is he gets short of breath easier and his voice can sound tired.[/QUOTE]If if people believed that, this race wouldn't be close. For goodness sake, Trump tried to steal a presidential election. He likes to grab women by the pussy. He fucked a porn star and regularly banged a Playboy Playmate while his wife was pregnant and nursing. He screwed his partners, his investors, his bondholders, his banks, and his suppliers before he became president. AND HE'S LEADING IN THE POLLS. Which goes to show what a suck ass candidate Biden is. The Democrats are running a human vegetable for President. Admittedly another problem for Biden is that Americans aren't stupid. They don't believe that Bidenomics was the greatest thing since sliced white bread.
-
Vegetable? LOL
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2928258]If if people believed that, this race wouldn't be close. For goodness sake, Trump tried to steal a presidential election. He likes to grab women by the pussy. He fucked a porn star and regularly banged a Playboy Playmate while his wife was pregnant and nursing. He screwed his partners, his investors, his bondholders, his banks, and his suppliers before he became president. AND HE'S LEADING IN THE POLLS. Which goes to show what a suck ass candidate Biden is. The Democrats are running a human vegetable for President. Admittedly another problem for Biden is that Americans aren't stupid. They don't believe that Bidenomics was the greatest thing since sliced white bread.[/QUOTE]It has been close since long before the debate.
You are obviously discounting how stupid Repubs are to think Biden caused Trump's Pandemic global supply-chain closure global Inflation.
Not to mention Repubs have been enthusiastically voting en masse for horrific economic and national security Disasters for America for at least 100 years. Scandal, hypocrisy and "Once in 100 Years Disasters" are a plus in a Repub candidate, not a negative.
The same as it is for the Repubs' always reliable benefactors in Mainstream Media.
Do you honestly think the numbskulls in the polls and right here who think the unemployment rate is at a 50 year high, the econony has tanked, he Stock Market crashed this year, that crime is up and, yep, even that Biden is responsible for abolishing Roe v. Wade got to those idiotic conclusions without pro Repub "Bothsiderism" tirelessly working to get them there? LOL. How on earth would that happen otherwise?
Vegetable? Please cite the answer to any question in the debate or the ABC interview where Biden and not Trump babbled on as though he didn't understand the question. Biden simply twisted a comment about "beating big pharma for Medicare drug prices" in an answer about Medicare and helping people get the drugs they need cheaper. That's it.
Trump could not explain anything complicated that he did to help Americans that way because he never helped Americans in any way complicated or not. Makes it easy for him to continually cycle back to a favorite lie about Immigration for every question.
-
Ugly
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2928258]If if people believed that, this race wouldn't be close. For goodness sake, Trump tried to steal a presidential election. He likes to grab women by the pussy. He fucked a porn star and regularly banged a Playboy Playmate while his wife was pregnant and nursing. He screwed his partners, his investors, his bondholders, his banks, and his suppliers before he became president. AND HE'S LEADING IN THE POLLS. Which goes to show what a suck ass candidate Biden is. The Democrats are running a human vegetable for President. Admittedly another problem for Biden is that Americans aren't stupid. They don't believe that Bidenomics was the greatest thing since sliced white bread.[/QUOTE]No, I think it shows what a suck ass populace the United States has. It's just insane that someone like Trump is even competitive. He should have been disqualified long before now in the eyes of most with a logical brain for the things he's done. America the beautiful? No, America the ugly it is!
-
Precisely!
[QUOTE=Xpartan;2928256]Tell you what. I don't care about "down the line".[/QUOTE]Now we're getting down to it. Now we're being honest. Exactly! You can't see the forest for the trees because you only care about your own interests. And that's seeing Felonious Chump get his. Well, I want to see him get his too (badly), but in a way that a country guided by the rule of law and democratic principles would have him get it. Otherwise, we're no better than them (the Repukeians). With all its warts and all, the Supreme Court is working the way it's supposed to (although there does need to be some more stringent ethics rules imposed I believe). Now, I didn't see left wingers (I can't stand the tree hugging far left either) crying and boo hooing when there was liberal control over the Court for decades.
As much as I hate the current mix on the court, elections have consequences. Trump won fair and square the first time around and got three freaking picks (Ginsburg should have stepped down to allow Biden a pick). We have to accept [B]both[/B] our wins [B]and[/B] our losses as long as the system works the way it's supposed to. If you or anybody else can't do that, then you're doing the very same thing you're accusing Trump of doing (and Trump is rightly accused I add). There has to be some [B]objectivity[/B] when and where objectivity is called for. If you can't do that, then you're no better than some biased, political hack.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2928288]
You are obviously discounting how stupid Repubs are to think Biden caused Trump's Pandemic global supply-chain closure global Inflation.
Not to mention Repubs have been enthusiastically voting en masse for horrific economic and national security Disasters for America for at least 100 years. Scandal, hypocrisy and "Once in 100 Years Disasters" are a plus in a Repub candidate, not a negative.
The same as it is for the Repubs' always reliable benefactors in Mainstream Media.[/QUOTE]Please up your game or Gish Gallop or whatever you want to call it.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2928288]Do you honestly think the numbskulls in the polls and right here who think the unemployment rate is at a 50 year high, the econony has tanked, he Stock Market crashed this year, that crime is up and, yep, even that Biden is responsible for abolishing Roe v. Wade got to those idiotic conclusions without pro Repub "Bothsiderism" tirelessly working to get them there? LOL. How on earth would that happen otherwise?[/QUOTE]Here's Biden's problem:
[URL]https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LEU0252881600Q[/URL]
Real wages were up about 6. 5% during Trump's term. They're down 2. 5% during Biden's time in office. Prices of goods and services have gone up faster than wages. I'm not necessarily saying Biden is responsible, although his American Rescue Plan did kick off inflation in the USA before it hit other countries. But people's perception is they're worse off now than when Biden came to office. The irony is that Democrats needlessly pumped a huge amount of stimulus into the economy in 2021 and 2022, and instead of buying lots of votes they ended up with inflation, lower real wages, deficits of 7% of GDP, and federal debt held by the public around 100% of GDP. That's not a pretty picture.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2928288]Vegetable? Please cite the answer to any question in the debate or the ABC interview where Biden and not Trump babbled on as though he didn't understand the question. Biden simply twisted a comment about "beating big pharma for Medicare drug prices" in an answer about Medicare and helping people get the drugs they need cheaper. That's it..[/QUOTE]Please cite any time during the debate when Biden wasn't babbling. Trump simply refused to answer the questions. Instead he talked about whatever he wanted.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2927513]And while President Biden, may now have [i][b]"King like powers"[/b][/i], rest assured that may not translate as well, under a corrupt 2/3 conservative SCOTUS, where the rules of law, [b][i]"suddenly shift",[/i][/b] according to partisanship politics and who's in the White House. Meaning those [i]"King like powers"[/i] in all likelihood, would look, feel and convey something very different, than if say, a narcissist, lying, cheater, racist, fascist, dictatorial [b]"Project 2025"[/b] president were in office and a 2/3 conservative SCOTUS is presiding.[/QUOTE]"I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they're saying and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them."
--Donald J. Trump.
-
Someday, someday, someday
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2928459]Please up your game or Gish Gallop or whatever you want to call it.
Here's Biden's problem:
[URL]https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LEU0252881600Q[/URL]
Real wages were up about 6. 5% during Trump's term. They're down 2. 5% during Biden's time in office. Prices of goods and services have gone up faster than wages. I'm not necessarily saying Biden is responsible, although his American Rescue Plan did kick off inflation in the USA before it hit other countries. But people's perception is they're worse off now than when Biden came to office. The irony is that Democrats needlessly pumped a huge amount of stimulus into the economy in 2021 and 2022, and instead of buying lots of votes they ended up with inflation, lower real wages, deficits of 7% of GDP, and federal debt held by the public around 100% of GDP. That's not a pretty picture.
Please cite any time during the debate when Biden wasn't babbling. Trump simply refused to answer the questions. Instead he talked about whatever he wanted.[/QUOTE]Someday I would love to see what an incoming Repub would do in the midst of the kind of historic, unprecedented shitstorm of a "Once in 100 Years Disaster", millions upon millions of jobs wiped out, double digit unemployment rates, CEOs of every major company in America if not the world diving under their beds and refusing to come out come our wherever you are, stock market Crashes and all the other typical conditions that all too often exist when Dems take over from Repubs.
Biden was faced with two of the worst versions of it in history, taking over at or near the top in the Executive Branch after GW Bush AND Donald J. Trump!
Holy shit. Can you imagine?
Oh, I am so sure the incoming Repub will be able to recover the entire global economy from the kind of crap results Repubs produce without triggering even transitional inflation, 15 million jobs created (that would be a record for the past 4 Repub presidents combined!) and everything running as smooth as a Swiss watch without so much as an extra dime added to the deficit.
There is a reason Repubs must demonize economic reovery inflation; they have never been given the opportunity to recover anything from the outgoing Dem!
Well, we do have one example of a Repub taking over just as the economy was about to Crash BIG TIME: when Hoover took from Coolidge after 8 years of total Repub control of the Federal government, WH, House and Senate. Yep, we ceryainly know how Repubs would handle such a total Repub shitstorm from that example; he makes it much, much worse and for many more years.
Looks like Fred forgot about that other sterling Trump economic condition he created; laying the ground work for, creating and exacerbating Trump's Pandemic.
The greater achievement of Biden's American Rescue Plan was that it recovered America better, faster and stronger from Trump's Pandemic than any other economic power, thereby recovering the rest of the world since we are the main customers and impetus for the global supply chains Trump's economic and national security decisions in 2018,2019 and 2020 caused.
And he did it without triggering a Global Depression or so much as a Global Recession. Unlike Repub Hoover.
So I suppose now you are a big supporter of former Mainstream Media darling but now mostly mysteriously Missing In Action Larry Summers' and every other notable economists' assessment that this time Trump's idiotic economic plans for his 2nd term will skyrocket inflation and not lower the cost of anyone's rent, food and gas, right?
Verbal ticks aside, there was more truth and substance in any one of Biden's responses to the Presidential Debate Quiz Show questions and in his ABC interview than on all of Trump's evasive, ignorant, blathering and demented rapid fire Gish Gallop 30-50 lies in just his 45 minutes of the Show combined. And we can include in all of his MAGA rallies combined, too, for that matter.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2928246]I've been reading the NYT since the 80's, this is clearly the best article I've ever seen them publish, it alone will have made this years subscription worth it.
And to think this great man once worked for the evil turd Romney, Allahu Akbar.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/06/opinion/populism-power-elites-politics.html[/URL][/QUOTE]Nice link, MDS. It shows you how the NYT does not want to be left behind.
Matt Taibbi and Walter Kern did their weekly podcast and left a few gems about the media:
So right now, I was saying before the show, the press reminds me, especially the press, of a showgirl, Las Vegas showgirl, kind of aging, who married a rich guy, and then he divorced her, and now she's trying to get her virginity back so she can get the next rich guy.
I think this is 100% the whole thing about if you see a flock, a herd of deer, they'll stay in place until exactly 50% of them decide to move and then they all go. Right? And you can watch that phenomenon in nature over and over again. Schools of fish, whatever it is.
That is 100% what the press corps is, I think, because once they go, they all go, right, and they never go anywhere alone, which is kind of the problem.
And Stelter isn't one of those who goes early, okay. He is the exact measure of the 50% mark. He won't be in the last quintile. He won't be in the first quintile. He will be at exactly that moment.
Brian Stetler formally of CNN tweeted: The sheer amount of conspiracy theory on the left is deeply unhealthy. All the people who seemed convinced that CNN are trying to ruin Biden and re-elect Trump. In reality, news outlets just want to report the news.
End of link.
Apparently, people were ROTFLAO after Stetler tweeted this, but to those of us grounded in reality know CNN were kissing Biden's ass and kicking Trump's. The media now is actually trying to go back to its objective self of twenty years ago.
And yes, that is the perfect metaphor for this forum, the media as hooker. I wasn't fucking that old man for money. I am a virgin and I really like you. LOL. And now you got guys like Looney Tooms screaming at the media, "You hooker!" You cannot make this shit up!
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2928243]
Your link was from a firearm association that I am sure is recommending every terrified American buy and hoard a dozen semi-automatic weapons to protect themselves from murderous woke drag queens.[/QUOTE]And that is why I call you a douche. You disregard facts you do not like. You can take a walk down any street in a blue city and see it ravaged by drug doing, crime committing, mentally ill homeless people.
I had a number of links I could have chosen from with regards to cities not reporting crimes, and you can google it yourself and see it is true, but like I said, you are a douche who disregards facts he does not like.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2928207]Abigail Disney is a piker. Tooms' real estate and mutual fund empire may be worth more than everything she's got. Her contributions to the Democratic Party will not be missed. They were a drop in the bucket.
Furthermore, she hasn't really done anything in her life except sit on her fat ass and support questionable causes. I don't like that, and it's partly why, unlike you, I don't like RFK, Jr. He's from the same mold, except he's not fat. I'm not sure what he's done besides living off of his Grand Daddy's money.[/QUOTE]It is not just Abigail Disney. [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/major-donors-cut-biden-prepare-pacs-fund-mini-primary-and-new-candidate[/URL].
Apparently, Kamala Harris is making the rounds in Texas where, and this shocked me, seven of the biggest 10 Democratic donors are. This was told to me by a friend big in Republican circles. I could not find this info on line.
Top of the list was Lisa Blue Barron. I had not heard of her before. [URL]https://www.texasmonthly.com/articles/the-unsinkable-lisa-blue/[/URL].
She has kept her name of the billionaire list apparently. It was interesting that my friend knew all about her unlike the usual bigwigs you would expect to hear from like the Bass family. She was entrenched in the John Edwards scandal.
[URL]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2137443/John-Edwards-trial-Aide-Andrew-Youngs-wife-Cheri-Young-tears-disgusting-cover-up.html[/URL]
Baron's wife, a lawyer and psychologist, had recently visited the Edwardses and she advised them to steer clear of Elizabeth, who was angry with the Youngs over their role in her husband's affair.
It looks like she is or at least was highly invested in the Democratic party and probably still is, but it seems she may be souring on Biden if Kamala had to fly out to see her.
And apparently, Biden was not returning calls from big donors which I am sure you can surmise is death to a modern political candidate, so it is just more than just one bad night and bad debate.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2928209]Biden narrows Trumps lead in swing states after debate debacle: Survey.
July 6, 2024[/QUOTE]You and your polls.
[URL]https://www.oddschecker.com/us/politics/us-politics[/URL]
This changes but odds of Biden winning are below Kamala Harris winning.
Trump is at +145, down from his highs at +200, but this translates to 60% winning.
And the latest polls conducted by Democrats show Trump having a chance in blue state strongholds like Minnesota, New Jersey, and Virginia.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qt48oQi39A[/URL]
Sorry, Loony Tooms, your guy is way down, and Trump is in hiding which is smart. He has learned when to stay quiet which shows growth. You do not fight your enemies when they are busy destroying themselves.
-
BTW, about the increase in wages under Trump
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2928459]Please up your game or Gish Gallop or whatever you want to call it.
Here's Biden's problem:
[URL]https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LEU0252881600Q[/URL]
Real wages were up about 6. 5% during Trump's term. They're down 2. 5% during Biden's time in office. Prices of goods and services have gone up faster than wages. I'm not necessarily saying Biden is responsible, although his American Rescue Plan did kick off inflation in the USA before it hit other countries. But people's perception is they're worse off now than when Biden came to office. The irony is that Democrats needlessly pumped a huge amount of stimulus into the economy in 2021 and 2022, and instead of buying lots of votes they ended up with inflation, lower real wages, deficits of 7% of GDP, and federal debt held by the public around 100% of GDP. That's not a pretty picture.
Please cite any time during the debate when Biden wasn't babbling. Trump simply refused to answer the questions. Instead he talked about whatever he wanted.[/QUOTE]I pointed this out before, but I can see it is time for a reminder; The increase in wages under Trump had virtually zero to do with anything Trump said, did, blathered, proposed or passed.
Since we know Trump's one and only $2. 5+ Trillion economic "stimulus" legislation in all 4 years of his so-called presidency until his Trump's Pandemic required billions and billions in emergency relief checks (while millions and millions of jobs were being wiped out) did not create 1 net job gain in his 3 merely below average economy years pre Trump's Pandemic vs the 3 previous years without it:
[B]Obamas Last Three Years Of Job Growth All Beat Trumps Best Year.[/B]
[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2020/02/07/obamas-last-three-years-of-job-growth-all-beat-trumps-best-year/[/URL]
[B]CEOs admit they won't create jobs with their tax cut money.
Despite White House hype, businesses aren't very interested in investing their extra profits.[/B]
[URL]https://www.salon.com/2017/11/17/ceos-admit-they-wont-create-jobs-with-their-tax-cut-money/[/URL]
[B]Q.What were the economic effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act?[/B]
[URL]https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/what-were-economic-effects-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act[/URL]
[QUOTE]A.Most analysts expected the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to boost economic output modestly in both the short and the longer run. The evidence supports the prediction for the short run. Because they are confounded by the large and lasting effects of the COVID. pandemic and related policies, we will probably never be able to disentangle the long-term effects. [B]However there was little evidence of a strong effect on investment that could lead to higher longer-run growth in the years before the pandemic.[/b][/QUOTE]And given Trump's history of shitting on the American worker at every turn, including the typically Repub rejection of raising workers' wages:
[B]Trump's Anti-Worker Record.[/B]
[URL]https://cwa-union.org/trumps-anti-worker-record[/URL]
Then what possible miracle could have caused wages to increase for ANYBODY under Donald Trump?
Uh. A gentle reminder:
[B]From California to New York, states are raising minimum wages in 2019 for 17 million workers.
Dec. 27, 2018[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2018/12/27/minimum-wage-2019-which-states-increasing-next-year/2377035002/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Besides New York, workers in up to 21 other states and the District of Columbia will receive higher minimum wages next year, according to a National Employment Law Project report given exclusively to USA TODAY. About 17 million workers will benefit from the 2019 wage increases, the nonprofit estimates.[/QUOTE]Yeah, that's right. Despite Trump's typically Repub horrific results for the American worker, for jobs creation, for being anti-American Worker and resistant to wage increases, it tuned out that during most of those historically expensive, deficit-balooning, below average-to-horrific Trump economic years, primarily Blue cities and states, where the majority of American workers are gainfully employed anyway, enjoyed lovely increases in the minimum wage.
Which, as we all know, tends to inspire other employers to raise middle income wages as well.
It had nothing to do with anything Donald Trump did. At all. Donald Trump only did his best to wipe out jobs and depress American worker wages.
-
Think out-the-box and get your own damn, "Gish Gallop"...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2927970]I almost fell out of my chair thinking you and Loony Tooms think you have great minds. You two are certainly in line for Electroconvulsive therapy. You two have that in common. To be fair, a more fair person like Tiny might say you, Tooms, and Xpartan are suffering from cognitive dissonance. [/QUOTE]
Your response is why I love to use that quote...so very much! Thanks Elvis 2008, for reaffirming what the quote means! (...kkkk!)
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2928204][b]The Art of the Gish Gallop[/b] Elvis doesn't Gish Gallop. [b]He thinks out of the box.[/b] Trump does, but he's not an effective practitioner of the art because his misrepresentations are so ridiculous. As Sidney Powell's lawyers argued in Dominion Voting System's defamation case against her, many of Trump's lies are so ridiculous or so hyperbolic that no one takes them seriously. [/QUOTE]
YES, Tiny 12, if there is an [b]"art"[/b] to the speech and talk of Gish Gallop, Elvis 2008 and Trump would definitely be the go to de facto standard! (...kkkk!)
[b]STOP ALREADY![/b] (Or as you Repubs would love say "...STOP THE STEAL! ...kkkk!) Really, you Repubs are just too much!
Up to your old tricks again, trying to co-opt and steal yet another brilliant word phraseology and [i]"coined phase"[/i], that was clearly created, constructed and conceived [b]BY[/b] Dems [b]FOR [u]OUR[/u] USE[/b] and consumption to describe Repub's word salad and unhinged forms of speech.
The nicely crafted, word phraseology, called Gish Gallop, perfectly encapsulates, articulates and best describes the type of [i][b]"gobbledygook"[/b][/i], Democrats have had to endure everyday, from likes of you,[i][b]"no nothing, do nothing"[/b][/i] QAnon/MAGA Republicans.
The term "Gish Gallop" is every bit Republican, as the word "Republican", itself.
Sheesh! Typical "copycat" Repubs, always trying to steal things (like elections), that without question and most assuredly, has been fashioned by Dems, to poetically describe Repubs.
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2928204]Thanks for teaching us a new word Tooms! And for teaching us how to use it! Just like The Donald created Trump University to teach about real estate, perhaps you should start Tooms University to teach Gish Gallop. Just make sure you actually teach people something or you may get sued like Trump. [/QUOTE]
Yes, thanks to EihTooms! Yet another great article, on how to view and describe more [i][b]"no nothing, do nothing"[/b][/i] QAnon/MAGA Republicans, clogging up the American political system, with their "gish gallop". Yes, definitely a term that applies strictly to Repubs and their nonsense!
[b]PS:[/b] Thanks Tiny 12, for an other great example of whom "Gish Gallop" perfectly describes, by citing, the Repub lawyer trying to defend his, "Jewish Space Laser" bat-shit-crazy Repub client, Sidney Powell, with more bat-crazy-shit unhinged drivel, spoken by Repub ex-President "pussy-grabber", in Trump. One has to wonder, who's crazier?
-
Just like LEFT in Britain and France, President Biden will WIN in 2024...
President Joe Biden and Democrats, should take tremendous solace and joy, as the LEFT in both Britain and France, carry the day with great wins and how once again [b]"the polls"[/b], got it all so WRONG in their [b]careless predictions[/b] of a [i]"far right sweep"[/i] in France.
The LEFT and Center-LEFT citizens of France form a coalition to [u]REJECT[/u] the far-RIGHT and in Britain, the LEFT Labour Party, formed a landslide majority, over the [b]"14-year no nothing, do nothing"[/b] conservatives there.
So just as "the polls" have been dead wrong about France, President Joe Biden and almost every major and minor US elections and primaries since 2020, I suspect that, that losing trend will continue and President Biden, will indeed WIN in Nov 2024.
-
Banks are licking their chops at the prospect of another Repub Trump term
If you want more mid- to long-term inflation, a slower economy (read: crap jobs creation and wage gains), policies that help make banks and bankers wealthier, home builders less so and another fine and dandy Repub / Trump Recession (which are almost always "Great", of course), those polls showing Trump ticking up vs Biden should be very comforting for you.
And why haven't we heard much about that Reverse Yield Curve thingy lately? Perhaps because it does a bad job of predicting a Recession under Dem policy and stewardship but a "nearly infallible" job of it under Repub policy and stewardship. Oh, these Repub vs Dem economic results are just so magical and mysterious. LOL.
[B]Trump's increased election odds after debate already affecting financial markets.
July 8, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/08/trumps-better-election-odds-after-debate-are-already-moving-markets.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Financial markets are slowly starting to absorb the possibility that what was once a toss-up presidential election campaign has taken a notable turn.
While it may yet become an overstatement to call the June 27 debate between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump a watershed moment, the incumbents halting and mumbling performance has changed views about where the race is headed.
In both polling data and the predictions market, the Republican challenger has become a solid favorite, up mid-single digits in several recent polls, with the specter lingering that Biden wont even be his partys nominee come November.
That has put investors in a quandary of how to handicap what a Trump presidency would look like from an economic and market standpoint.
"As Trumps numbers rose earlier last week, people started to speculate that [b]a Trump win would mean a little bit more mid- to long-term inflation, potentially slower economy, which is why the yield curve steepened a little bit, and which is why longer-term bonds got a little pressure earlier in the week[/b], said Mark Malek, chief investment officer at Siebert AdvisorNXT.
Were going to watch that, because theres no definitive sort of direction yet, but we feel that the market is starting to try to figure that stuff out, he added.
Stock market reaction has been fairly benign so far: The S&P 500 has continued to scale record heights, albeit gradually, and is up about 1.5% since the last close before the debate.
[B]However, the bond market has had a bit more of a reaction. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield has gradually declined and, perhaps more importantly, has moved further below the 2-year note.
The phenomenon, known as an inverted yield curve, has been a nearly infallible predictor of recessions[/b], though the current inversion started in July 2022 and there has not been an official recession since. The inversion has steepened in the past several days as Trump has shown a post-debate polling bounce, indicating misgivings about the economys prospects.
Handicapping a second Trump presidency
Other market reaction regarding a potential Trump victory, as measured by Bank of Americas chief investment strategist, Michael Hartnett: [b]winners were rates volatility, bets that benefit as the yield curve steepens, banks and technology. Losers have featured longer-dated bonds, homebuilders, renewable energy stocks and emerging market currencies.[/b]
Hartnett also noted that the odds of a Trump-led Republican sweep of the White House and both chambers in Congress have swelled to 36%.
Reading the tea leaves, though, has been difficult. The first Trump presidency and some of his campaign rhetoric nevertheless has led to guesswork about what could be ahead.
[B]"The extension of the 2017 tax cuts and potential deregulatory agenda of former President Trump are starting to get priced into the market, Ed Mills, Washington policy analyst for Raymond James, said in a note. This particularly favors financials and there will be an expectation of more M&A approval in a Trump presidency. A potential for more inflationary policies should also be closely monitored.[/b]
Reverse Goldilocks reaction
Inflation has been a major problem for Biden as the consumer price index has risen more than 19% on his watch, compared with less than 8% during Trumps time in office.
But it was the presidents stumbling debate performance that brought out the knives, with some congressional Democrats and mainstream media outlets such as The New York Times calling for him to step aside.
PredictIt, a widely watched though thinly traded predictions market, put Trumps chances of victory around 59% as of Monday afternoon.
However, in a switch, Bidens defiant statements that he would stay in the race caused a swing on the betting site, giving him a 29% chance of victory compared with 15% for Vice President Kamala Harris. In recent days, there had been heavy speculation that Harris could step in for Biden on the ballot, and she had overtaken his chances of being the nominee before that changed Monday.
PredictIt, though, now gives Biden a 56% chance of being the Democrat nominee, with Harris falling 12 points to just 31%.
Chris Krueger, Washington strategist for TD Cowen, called this week Bidens Gauntlet as it will be crucial to his viability as a candidate.
"Biden remains the presumptive nominee...for the time being, Krueger wrote, adding that Bidens interview Friday with ABCs George Stephanopoulos was a bit of a reverse Goldilocks: just good enough to stay in the race, but not good enough to alleviate concerns about acuity. [/QUOTE]
-
Hey you Leave Bangkok Bob alone
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2928511]And that is why I call you a douche. You disregard facts you do not like. You can take a walk down any street in a blue city and see it ravaged by drug doing, crime committing, mentally ill homeless people.
I had a number of links I could have chosen from with regards to cities not reporting crimes, and you can google it yourself and see it is true, but like I said, you are a douche who disregards facts he does not like.[/QUOTE]What crime there is no crime here.
I live here and these are all just MAGA lies.
[URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/weekend-shootings-july-3-to-8/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1XjY-wU1qEcET4CX9V-j-q2YuXFxSeGTTVzFZ9VsvOzds31YYE-oasU4Y_aem_rymfttwwaiVaYRQtixZxfw[/URL]
And the OC is as safe as ever.
[URL]https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-07-05/two-dead-three-injured-in-huntington-beach-stabbing[/URL]
[URL]https://www.latimes.com/socal/daily-pilot/california/story/2024-07-03/fashion-island-shooting-leaves-one-dead[/URL]
I can post 1000 links everyday like this, 7 days a week from every city and state.
I've tried but I don't see them posted.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2928512]It is not just Abigail Disney. [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/major-donors-cut-biden-prepare-pacs-fund-mini-primary-and-new-candidate[/URL].
Apparently, Kamala Harris is making the rounds in Texas where, and this shocked me, seven of the biggest 10 Democratic donors are. This was told to me by a friend big in Republican circles. I could not find this info on line.
Top of the list was Lisa Blue Barron. I had not heard of her before. [URL]https://www.texasmonthly.com/articles/the-unsinkable-lisa-blue/[/URL].
She has kept her name of the billionaire list apparently. It was interesting that my friend knew all about her unlike the usual bigwigs you would expect to hear from like the Bass family. She was entrenched in the John Edwards scandal.
[URL]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2137443/John-Edwards-trial-Aide-Andrew-Youngs-wife-Cheri-Young-tears-disgusting-cover-up.html[/URL]
Baron's wife, a lawyer and psychologist, had recently visited the Edwardses and she advised them to steer clear of Elizabeth, who was angry with the Youngs over their role in her husband's affair.
It looks like she is or at least was highly invested in the Democratic party and probably still is, but it seems she may be souring on Biden if Kamala had to fly out to see her.
And apparently, Biden was not returning calls from big donors which I am sure you can surmise is death to a modern political candidate, so it is just more than just one bad night and bad debate.[/QUOTE]Very interesting Texas Monthly article Elvis. Thanks for the link. Three observations,
1. Lisa Baron's husband was THE premier asbestos lawyer in the United States. He and the rest of the asbestos bar bankrupted around 100 USA Companies, including one I owned shares in. They and their clients collected over $200 billion in compensation, back when $200 billion was a lot of money. The majority of the companies had little to do with health problems caused by asbestos. But with "joint and several liability" it didn't matter. Over 100,000 jobs were lost as a result as a result of asbestos lawsuits.
As a group, plaintiffs lawyers contribute far more to the Democratic Party and Democratic politicians than any other professional group. They've stumped up billions for Democrats over the decades. And the Democratic Party is firmly in the pocket of the plaintiff's bar.
It's not just asbestos. The only manufacturer of silicon breast implants in the USA was forced out of business, even though there was "0" evidence they caused cancer. For a good while, no private propeller or turbo prop planes were manufactured in the USA, because the manufacturers were afraid they'd get sued out of existence. And one of the reasons medical costs are so high is because doctors' and hospitals' insurance costs are out of control, because of greedy plaintiffs' lawyers.
Lisa's a lawyer too, who used to work in her hubby's law firm. That's her background. And there are a lot more like her, pumping up the Democratic Party, which is only too happy to help the lawyers, while screwing over the businesses, doctors and working people who lose their jobs.
2. From your links, Fred Baron forked over $400,000, which would be over $1 million today, to cover up John Edward's love child with a campaign worker and provide housing for her. Edwards got off Scot free in court (which I'd argue wasn't necessarily an unreasonable outcome) while Trump got 34 felony convictions. Here are the differences in their cases.
A. Trump used his own money to pay off Stormy Daniels. The National Enquirer fully expected that Trump was going to reimburse it for the money it paid Karen McDougal. But Trump being Trump, he didn't fork over the money. In Edwards case, Fred Baron, who along with the rest of the plaintiffs bar stood much to gain from having one of their own in the Presidency, paid the money. (John Edwards was a plaintiffs' lawyer too.)
B. Trump's wife wasn't aware of Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal, who he was banging while she was pregnant and nursing. Edwards wife on the other hand was well aware of his love child. If I had Trump's money, I wouldn't bat an eye at paying $400,000 or $500,000 to cover up an affair. To him that's a drop in the bucket compared to the cost of a divorce. In other words, hiding the affairs from the public because he was running for president wasn't the only reason he paid up. Edwards' wife knew, so his presidential campaign was the sole motivation for Fred Baron's payoff. Btw, to cover up the affair, another one of Edwards young MARRIED campaign staffers took the hit. He said he was the father. I'm sure all this was just fine with his wife, and with Edwards' wife who was dying of cancer at the time.
C. Trump was tried in Manhattan, where 87% of the population voted for Biden. The prosecutor campaigned on jailing Trump.
3. Lisa Baron's life is a good argument for socialism. She was throwing 30 parties a year, complete with bands like the Moody Blues, Sheryl Crow, Don Henly, and ZZ Top! Wouldn't you have liked to had a party in your backyard with ZZ Top performing? Contrast to wealthy people like Elon Musk and the Koch Brothers, who recycle their earnings into legitimate philanthropy and new businesses that create jobs in America, instead of parties.
Apologies for not sticking to your topic, which is campaign contributions to Biden, but I couldn't resist.
-
LOL. Now that is funny
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2928682]What crime there is no crime here.
I live here and these are all just MAGA lies.
[URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/weekend-shootings-july-3-to-8/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1XjY-wU1qEcET4CX9V-j-q2YuXFxSeGTTVzFZ9VsvOzds31YYE-oasU4Y_aem_rymfttwwaiVaYRQtixZxfw[/URL]
And the OC is as safe as ever.
[URL]https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-07-05/two-dead-three-injured-in-huntington-beach-stabbing[/URL]
[URL]https://www.latimes.com/socal/daily-pilot/california/story/2024-07-03/fashion-island-shooting-leaves-one-dead[/URL]
I can post 1000 links everyday like this, 7 days a week from every city and state.
I've tried but I don't see them posted.[/QUOTE]Even as far away as Bangkok, we recognize the Cognitively Impaired Winger Hilarity of Elvis lamenting that he "had a number of links I could have chosen from with regards to cities not reporting crimes, and you can google it yourself and see it is true", which you even quoted, followed a 2nd Winger posting REPORTS of random, anecdotal crimes in cities with assurances that he can post a 1000 of these REPORTS every day. LOL.
Really, I could not have written and planned that joke to play out any better if I had done it from a writer's office smack in the middle of Hollywood, USA, rather than laying in bed in my comfy apartment in Bangkok.
Uh. Anecdotal reports of crimes are not the same as repeatedly substantiated data showing crime and crime rates in the USA are down, way down, under Biden after a couple of historic upward spikes under Trump.
-
Correction: The 400,000 Baron spent would only be 600,000 in 2024 dollars. I plugged the wrong year in my inflation calculator.
-
Well the reason the oligarchy wants Scumbag Joe out of the race
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2928515]You and your polls.
[URL]https://www.oddschecker.com/us/politics/us-politics[/URL]
This changes but odds of Biden winning are below Kamala Harris winning.
Trump is at +145, down from his highs at +200, but this translates to 60% winning.
And the latest polls conducted by Democrats show Trump having a chance in blue state strongholds like Minnesota, New Jersey, and Virginia.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qt48oQi39A[/URL]
Sorry, Loony Tooms, your guy is way down, and Trump is in hiding which is smart. He has learned when to stay quiet which shows growth. You do not fight your enemies when they are busy destroying themselves.[/QUOTE]They rigged the 2020 primary for him.
They rigged the 2020 general election for him.
Most people know it was rigged many others won't admit but they know it as well (hint hint Bangkok Bob et al here).
If he stays in the race the only way they can beat Bad Orange Man would be to rig it again.
And you can only cheat so many times before you get caught red handed, and you ruin the hustle.
Not to mention NO ONE would believe it if they woke up Nov 6 and the media declares Scumbag Joe miraculously WON AGAIN!
Bangkok Bob might come on here saying it was a legit election.
Whilst ROTFL his ass off.
But they want a clean slate, so they can start anew.
Hes a loser, he has never won, he dropped out after being labeled Scumbag Joe the cheating Plagiarist in 1987.
Then he came up very short in 2008.
Then he had to have the primary rigged and the general election 2020.
Their only way to beat Bad Orange Man is to swap out Scumbag Joe and cheat with a clean slate.
Allahu Akbar.
-
What a fucking shame
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2928697]Very interesting Texas Monthly article Elvis. Thanks for the link. Three observations,
1. Lisa Baron's husband was THE premier asbestos lawyer in the United States. He and the rest of the asbestos bar bankrupted around 100 USA Companies, including one I owned shares in. They and their clients collected over $200 billion in compensation, back when $200 billion was a lot of money. The majority of the companies had little to do with health problems caused by asbestos. But with "joint and several liability" it didn't matter. Over 100,000 jobs were lost as a result as a result of asbestos lawsuits.
As a group, plaintiffs lawyers contribute far more to the Democratic Party and Democratic politicians than any other professional group. They've stumped up billions for Democrats over the decades. And the Democratic Party is firmly in the pocket of the plaintiff's bar.
It's not just asbestos. The only manufacturer of silicon breast implants in the USA was forced out of business, even though there was "0" evidence they caused cancer. For a good while, no private propeller or turbo prop planes were manufactured in the USA, because the manufacturers were afraid they'd get sued out of existence. And one of the reasons medical costs are so high is because doctors' and hospitals' insurance costs are out of control, because of greedy plaintiffs' lawyers.
Lisa's a lawyer too, who used to work in her hubby's law firm. That's her background. And there are a lot more like her, pumping up the Democratic Party, which is only too happy to help the lawyers, while screwing over the businesses, doctors and working people who lose their jobs.
2. From your links, Fred Baron forked over $400,000, which would be over $1 million today, to cover up John Edward's love child with a campaign worker and provide housing for her. Edwards got off Scot free in court (which I'd argue wasn't necessarily an unreasonable outcome) while Trump got 34 felony convictions. Here are the differences in their cases.
A. Trump used his own money to pay off Stormy Daniels. The National Enquirer fully expected that Trump was going to reimburse it for the money it paid Karen McDougal. But Trump being Trump, he didn't fork over the money. In Edwards case, Fred Baron, who along with the rest of the plaintiffs bar stood much to gain from having one of their own in the Presidency, paid the money. (John Edwards was a plaintiffs' lawyer too.)
B. Trump's wife wasn't aware of Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal, who he was banging while she was pregnant and nursing. Edwards wife on the other hand was well aware of his love child. If I had Trump's money, I wouldn't bat an eye at paying $400,000 or $500,000 to cover up an affair. To him that's a drop in the bucket compared to the cost of a divorce. In other words, hiding the affairs from the public because he was running for president wasn't the only reason he paid up. Edwards' wife knew, so his presidential campaign was the sole motivation for Fred Baron's payoff. Btw, to cover up the affair, another one of Edwards young MARRIED campaign staffers took the hit. He said he was the father. I'm sure all this was just fine with his wife, and with Edwards' wife who was dying of cancer at the time.
C. Trump was tried in Manhattan, where 87% of the population voted for Biden. The prosecutor campaigned on jailing Trump.
3. Lisa Baron's life is a good argument for socialism. She was throwing 30 parties a year, complete with bands like the Moody Blues, Sheryl Crow, Don Henly, and ZZ Top! Wouldn't you have liked to had a party in your backyard with ZZ Top performing? Contrast to wealthy people like Elon Musk and the Koch Brothers, who recycle their earnings into legitimate philanthropy and new businesses that create jobs in America, instead of parties.
Apologies for not sticking to your topic, which is campaign contributions to Biden, but I couldn't resist.[/QUOTE]I knew a few guys that died from mesothelioma, I only wish they would of bankrupted many more, what a pity you only lost a few bucks.
And so many died.
[URL]https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/04/11/523277735/asbestos-deaths-remain-a-public-health-concern-cdc-finds[/URL]
I hope Warren Buffet loses his fucking ass too with BNSF.
Long Live the Plaintiffs Trial Lawyers Assoc!!
-
So now we know who butters your bread?
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2928717]
[b]What a fucking shame[/b]
[b]I knew a few guys that died from mesothelioma,[u]I only wish they would of bankrupted many more,[/u] what a pity you only lost a few bucks.[/b]
And so many died.
[URL]https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/04/11/523277735/asbestos-deaths-remain-a-public-health-concern-cdc-finds[/URL]
I hope Warren Buffet loses his fucking ass too with BNSF.
[b]Long Live the Plaintiffs Trial Lawyers Assoc!![/b][/QUOTE]Victims of asbestos related diseases should have received just and reasonable compensation. That doesn't require shutting down businesses and factories and destroying jobs at companies that no longer had anything to do with asbestos. The greedy plaintiffs lawyers (and you) didn't care. They were just focused on the $$$$. The greedy plaintiffs lawyers and their paid experts took home 25% to 50% of all money awarded to sufferers. Nowadays the bastards shuffle a few papers and get around $300,000 for every successful claim from the asbestos trust fund. Maybe that $300,000 should go into the pocket of the sufferer instead. Probably over $100 billion in 2024 dollars has gone into the asbestos lawyers pockets, enabling them to pay huge sums to their (and your?) favorite politicians.
Mitt Romney had something to do with a few bankruptcies. But at least he wasn't rooting for those companies to go out of business (MDS: "I only wish they would have bankrupted many more").
-
No Fan of ambulance chasers here
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2928861]Victims of asbestos related diseases should have received just and reasonable compensation. That doesn't require shutting down businesses and factories and destroying jobs at companies that no longer had anything to do with asbestos. The greedy plaintiffs lawyers (and you) didn't care. They were just focused on the $$$$. The greedy plaintiffs lawyers and their paid experts took home 25% to 50% of all money awarded to sufferers. Nowadays the bastards shuffle a few papers and get around $300,000 for every successful claim from the asbestos trust fund. Maybe that $300,000 should go into the pocket of the sufferer instead. Probably over $100 billion in 2024 dollars has gone into the asbestos lawyers pockets, enabling them to pay huge sums to their (and your?) favorite politicians.
Mitt Romney had something to do with a few bankruptcies. But at least he wasn't rooting for those companies to go out of business ("I only wish they would have bankrupted many more").[/QUOTE]Most attorneys are just as bad maybe even worse than "vulture capitalists" like Willard, maybe you should examine your sarcasm detector.
Odd that you took me so seriously here but didn't bother to comment on the NYT article which includes zero sarcasm?
[URL]https://www.google.com/search?q=sarcasm[/URL]+def&rlz=1 CATRYO_enUS1074&oq=sarcasm+def&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCDM5 MjNqMGo3 qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8.
BTW you write as if this was a lot of money? This was spread out over how many years (decades)? 30-40 yrs?
How about this by comparison, not that there is any moral equivalency between the two.
[URL]https://apnews.com/article/pandemic-fraud-waste-billions-small-business-labor-fb1d9a9eb24857efbe4611344311ae78[/URL]
-
1 photos
Soooo. Jetlagged
I have a cold and am So Jetlagged I took a Dump in my pants and I don't know what year it is.
-
Another comment about your beloved Willard
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2928861]Victims of asbestos related diseases should have received just and reasonable compensation. That doesn't require shutting down businesses and factories and destroying jobs at companies that no longer had anything to do with asbestos. The greedy plaintiffs lawyers (and you) didn't care. They were just focused on the $$$$. The greedy plaintiffs lawyers and their paid experts took home 25% to 50% of all money awarded to sufferers. Nowadays the bastards shuffle a few papers and get around $300,000 for every successful claim from the asbestos trust fund. Maybe that $300,000 should go into the pocket of the sufferer instead. Probably over $100 billion in 2024 dollars has gone into the asbestos lawyers pockets, enabling them to pay huge sums to their (and your?) favorite politicians.
Mitt Romney had something to do with a few bankruptcies. But at least he wasn't rooting for those companies to go out of business (MDS: "I only wish they would have bankrupted many more").[/QUOTE]He didn't have to "root" for their bankruptcies, he bought them to chop them up so that he could squeeze as much blood as possible out of them ie, raiding the workers pensions etc and the end result was bankruptcy.
That was a not a "bug" as they say, that was the plan from day 1.
-
Is this what Trump was resting up and hiding out for?
Trump had another incoherent blather campaign rally in Florida. Is he worried about losing Florida?
[B]Felon45 Delivers Unhinged 'Airports' Rant. Here's Why That's Bad For Biden![/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2024/07/felon-delivers-unhinged-rant-about[/URL]
[QUOTE]Politics is mentally exhausting these days. I get it, but imagine if President Biden spoke in that manner. The headlines calling him unfit would be splattered across the New York Times and The Washington Post every day for a month. CNN and MSNBC would harp on it 24/7. What's happening here is that the Beltway media has dismissed the the fact that we nominated Biden. They want to pick the winner of the 2024 election for clicks and airtime. That's not how this is supposed to work.[/QUOTE]My favorite is how numbskull Trump speaks with pride about, as a grown man mind you, not knowing what the hell NATO is but that it only took him 2 minutes to figure it out. And what did he figure out? The utterly inaccurate notion that there is some sort of "bill" they pay for USA protection and if they are "delinquent" in paying that "bill" he will just let Russia "do whatever the hell it wants. ".
So far there has been no sad editorial by Jon Voight in Newsmax asking his guy to drop out of the race over that, his obsession with Hannibal the Cannibal Lector, the constant repetition of dozens of easily debunked lies, the baby-talk intonation, the mush-mouth gobbledygook blathering even when reading his notes or a teleprompter, the 34 Felony Convistions for conspiring to commit Election Fraud in a scheme to Steal a Presidential Election or anything else.
I am anxious to watch the Republican National Convention next week to find out what that Party's and its candidates's platform is. At this point, as near as anyone can tell at this point it has something to do with:
- Play golf.
- Making America Great Again as it was before the Revolutionary War.
- Play golf.
- Continuing their decades' long push to outlaw Sex For Pleasure.
- Play golf.
- Enact economic policies to make banks and bankers wealthier, increase and prolong Inflation and raise taxes on every American who buys anything.
- Play golf.
- Assurances that its candidate will again leave America and the rest of the world bare ass naked against Preventing whatever glorious "Once in 100 Years Disaster" that Repubs are contractually obligated to find, embrace and exacerbate whenever they occupy the White House.
- Play golf.
- Possibly announce their candidate's VP choice. Not based on that person's qualifications and ability to take over the job of President is, say, the top of the ticket gets zapped by a bolt of lightning on the golf course. No. According to the Repub Party's candidate it will be based on whatever the Dem Party ticket looks like that day in order to, you know, play off of it.
- Play golf.
Mainstream Media will need to outdo its recent astonishingly effective mission to keep the Horse Race as neck-in-neck close and stimulating no matter how historically successful the Dem side is vs how historically atrocious the Repub side is. Which is say a lot. But, hey, that is what being a typically pro Repub Bothsider MSM is all about.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2928698]Even as far away as Bangkok, we recognize the Cognitively Impaired Winger Hilarity of Elvis lamenting that he "had a number of links I could have chosen from with regards to cities not reporting crimes, and you can google it yourself and see it is true"[/QUOTE]And this is why you are a douche Loony Tooms. Instead of seeing what I posted was true, you decided you were more comfortable with being lied to. My car insurance is up 50% under Biden. Why do you think that is? I know because I am here, but you do not have a fucking clue.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2928698]Really, I could not have written and planned that joke to play out any better if I had done it from a writer's office smack in the middle of Hollywood, USA, rather than laying in bed in my comfy apartment in Bangkok.
Uh. Anecdotal reports of crimes are not the same as repeatedly substantiated data showing crime and crime rates in the USA are down, way down, under Biden after a couple of historic upward spikes under Trump.[/QUOTE]So you repeat the government lies about crime being down and laugh and think you are legitimate. So you have two explanations for why the crime numbers are down: 1. Faulty reporting.
2. The numbers are real.
And you go with #2 because well, that is what you want to believe is true, and you are so fucking arrogant about it, and you rely on tried and true Democratic methods, attack the source and insult the opposition and show no interest in getting to any truth that might make the Democratic party look bad. And that is why you are a douche, Everything is Democrats good, Republicans bad.
What is so funny is you do not even know who your candidate for president is going to be. For a douche like you, who it is does not even matter. All that matters is he has the marking Democrat after his name. It is amazing how someone can go from being such a dunce to a genius in your douche eyes when that person votes for one party over the others. That is why douches like you are a threat to Democracy. You literally want a one party system.
-
Thanks again, Joe
And to think he managed to get the money those deadbeats owed America without a Repub MAGA 6 ruling of immunity to go ahead and kick down their doors and shoot them with AR-15 semi-automatic rifles as those idiotic warmongering Repubs threatened he would do:
[B]Treasury, IRS announce milestone of $1 billion in tax debt collected from millionaires.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/11/irs-says-its-collected-1-billion-in-past-due-taxes-from-millionaires.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The Treasury Department and the IRS announced the collection of more than $1 billion in tax debt from high-income individuals over the past year.
In September, the IRS announced plans to expand its scrutiny of those making more than $1 million annually with more than $250,000 in recognized tax debt.
However, the funding enacted in 2022 that is allowing the IRS to pursue its plans still has its critics, particularly among congressional Republicans.[/QUOTE]If only those Know Nothing, Do Knowing Repubs in Congress had authorized as much funding for this as Biden originally asked for, the Peace-loving, well-organized, knowledgeable and capable President of the United States, Joe Biden, would have gotten even more of America's money back from those deadbeats and into paying down Trump's historically high deficits, improving the country's infrastructure and creating American jobs.
LOL. That Trump's Pandemic-creating lunatic Trump had the gall to blather on and on about how shitty America is with its shitty airports after not legislating or producing one dime to improve America's infrastructure for anything anywhere in 4 horrific years of golfing at his failed resorts. LOL.
Now, back to Mainstream Media's pathological focus on Joe Biden skipping or slurring over an inconsequential syllable every now and then in a rally speech. More important matters.
-
Did you miss the Winger Hilarity of it?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2929216]And this is why you are a douche Loony Tooms. Instead of seeing what I posted was true, you decided you were more comfortable with being lied to. My car insurance is up 50% under Biden. Why do you think that is? I know because I am here, but you do not have a fucking clue.
So you repeat the government lies about crime being down and laugh and think you are legitimate. So you have two explanations for why the crime numbers are down: 1. Faulty reporting.
2. The numbers are real.
And you go with #2 because well, that is what you want to believe is true, and you are so fucking arrogant about it, and you rely on tried and true Democratic methods, attack the source and insult the opposition and show no interest in getting to any truth that might make the Democratic party look bad. And that is why you are a douche, Everything is Democrats good, Republicans bad..[/QUOTE]See, the joke is you say crimes in cities are no longer being reported and that is why the crime rate under Biden only "looks" like it has declined.
Meanwhile, your fellow Winger MDS is busy posting reports of crimes in big cities. LOL. Get it? Funny.
I have actually contributed more to reducing the USA crime rate, improving American infrastructure, creating American jobs, increasing American workers' wages, expanding the USA Economy, establishing new All-Time Record Closing Highs in the Stock Market and paying down the USA national debt all the way from Thailand with my mail-in votes for Biden, every other Dem I can vote for and never a Repub than you or anyone else who has ever voted for Trump or any other Repub even if you did it from the dead center of the state of Kansas.
You're welcome.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2928698]Even as far away as Bangkok, we recognize the Cognitively Impaired Winger Hilarity of Elvis lamenting that he "had a number of links I could have chosen from with regards to cities not reporting crimes, and you can google it yourself and see it is true", which you even quoted, followed a 2nd Winger posting REPORTS of random, anecdotal crimes in cities with assurances that he can post a 1000 of these REPORTS every day. LOL.
Really, I could not have written and planned that joke to play out any better if I had done it from a writer's office smack in the middle of Hollywood, USA, rather than laying in bed in my comfy apartment in Bangkok. [/QUOTE]Okay, and now this is from the WSJ.
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/articles/lies-damn-lies-and-crime-statistics-579186ae?mod=hp_opin_pos_3[/URL]#cxrecs_s.
The USA Has two measures of crime. The Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting program counts the number of crimes reported to police every year. The Bureau of Justice Statistics, in its National Crime Victimization Survey, asks some 240,000 people a year whether they have been victims of a crime. The two measures have diverged since 2020: The FBI has been reporting less crime, while more people say they have been victims.
The divergence is due to several reasons. In 2022,31% of police departments nationwide, including LOS Angeles and New York, didn't report crime data to the FBI. In addition, in cities from Baltimore to Nashville, Tenn. , the FBI is undercounting crimes those jurisdictions reported.
Another reason crimes reported to the police are falling is that arrest rates are plummeting. If victims don't believe criminals will be caught and punished, they won't bother reporting them.
End of link. I am cognitively impaired? You just spew out Democratic narratives and could give a rat's ass if they are true. Do you ever have an independent thought in your head?
-
54.4% of Americans disapprove of SCOTUS...Majority whining?
It seems even more Americans are whining about a corrupt 2/3 conservative Supreme Court, to the tune of a whooping [b]all-time high of 54.4%,[/b] that slightly more than half the country, that don't TRUST or believe in a SCOTUS that has become corrupt, manipulative and bribed by right-wing buddy billionaires.
[i]Do Americans distrust and disapprove of the Supreme Court?[/i] July 10rd, 2024
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/approval/supreme-court/[/URL]
That again is, [b]"an all-time high of 54.4% worth of whining"[/b]...being voiced by Americans!
With an unrepentant, corrupt and defiant SCOTUS, with no oversight, no accountability, that answers to no one, has Americans feeling they're nothing more than a rouge high-court partisan arm of the [i][b]"do nothing, no nothing"[/i][/b] Repub party.
So with an all-time high disapproval rating by Americans, no accountability or oversight and countless citations of bribes and influence peddling from right-wing buddy billionaires by the 2/3 conservative SCOTUS, I'm perplexed why some people think, Americans wouldn't believe, The MAGA 6 (aka. the corrupt 2/3 conservative Supreme Court) and kingmakers, that has deemed itself above the law, wouldn't [b][u]rule "immunity"[/u] differently for a Dem vs Repub president? [/b]
After all, if you're NOT accountable to anyone, anybody or anything, who's gonna STOP a corrupt, bias, immoral, partisan, Project 2025 and right-wing billionaire bribed SCOTUS judgement against a Dem?
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2929275]See, the joke is you say crimes in cities are no longer being reported and that is why the crime rate under Biden only "looks" like it has declined.
Meanwhile, your fellow Winger MDS is busy posting reports of crimes in big cities. LOL. Get it? Funny.
I have actually contributed more to reducing the USA crime rate, improving American infrastructure, creating American jobs, increasing American workers' wages, expanding the USA Economy, establishing new All-Time Record Closing Highs in the Stock Market and paying down the USA national debt all the way from Thailand with my mail-in votes for Biden, every other Dem I can vote for and never a Repub than you or anyone else who has ever voted for Trump or any other Repub even if you did it from the dead center of the state of Kansas.
You're welcome.[/QUOTE]I guess you are too stupid to realize a crime can be reported to the police and to the media but if the city does not report it, it does not go in the city's crime stats. So here we go again with you lying some more.
How do you figure you are reducing crime when you vote Democrat and 10 million illegals poured into the USA? Where is your rule of law bullshit on that?
So crime has been exploding in the USA while you douches justify making up a law to go after Trump.
And now you got guys riding mopeds stealing watches from NYC dinners. Good! [URL]https://robbreport.com/food-drink/dining/restaurant-thefts-nyc-rolex-patek-philippe-1235698756/[/URL].
And the first place I have seen and known of it is in South America. It looks like those dreamers have a different idea of the American dream.
And back to the arrogance. You have reduced crime. How can you know that when you are too damned stupid to even know what the crime rate is? And why would anyone believe a liar like you?
-
Factchecking the drop in crime rates under Biden
A much, much better economy, more jobs available, higher wages and so on under Biden today vs under Trump 4 years or for that matter under Biden last year vs Trump 4 years prior to that would logically support lower crime rates under Biden than Trump anyway, of course.
And then there is this:
[B]Trumps Bogus Attack on FBI Crime Statistics.
May 3, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2024/05/trumps-bogus-attack-on-fbi-crime-statistics/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Former President Donald Trump said FBI data that show homicides and other violent crimes trending down are fake numbers. [b]Theyre not.[/b]
The FBI data for 2023 are preliminary, but crime statistics experts say the reporting behind the overall downward trend is solid, and that trend is validated when compared to data samples from local and state law enforcement reports.
The FBI statistics contradict Trumps campaign narrative, repeated at a May 1 rally in Wisconsin, about rampant and rising violent crime in the U.S. And polls that show most Americans believe crime is on the increase. But that doesnt mean the data are wrong or fudged, as Trump put it.
The FBI statistics are, however, incomplete, given that they measure only crimes reported to law enforcement some crimes, such as rape, are historically greatly underreported and not every law enforcement agency reports its statistics. [B]That has been the case for decades.[/b]
Trumps dismissal of the validity of the FBIs crime statistics reminds us of when Trump was running for president in 2016 and falsely labeled the unemployment rates published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics as phony numbers.
At that time, Trump claimed the unemployment rate was really 42%. (The official unemployment rate then was 4.9%.) Less than two months after Trump took office, however, he was happy to cite BLS official unemployment rate. Sean Spicer, Trumps top spokesman at the time, joked in a press briefing about Trumps new embrace of the jobs data, Yeah, I talked to the president prior to this, and he said to quote him very clearly They may have been phony in the past, but its very real now.
According to the FBIs preliminary 2023 crime report, violent crimes dropped 5.7% between 2022 and 2023, and the number of murders declined 13.2%. Thats based on data from 79% of law enforcement agencies in the U.S., representing higher participation than any year during Trumps presidency. Murders and violent crime went up in 2020, Trumps last year in office, and murders continued to rise in 2021, albeit to a lesser extent, as violent crime ticked down a bit. Both have been declining since, according to FBI and other crime data.
.............
But the preliminary 2023 FBI report the one that found a 13.2% drop in murders and a 5.7% decline in violent crimes in 2023 compared with 2022 is based on 79.4% of agencies reporting.
Thats pretty good! Harvey said. Its higher than any reporting rate during the Trump presidency, and close to the highest observed reporting rate between 2000 and 2022 (81%).
[/QUOTE]My refusing to vote for any Repub since 1982 and only for Dems since 1996 means I have never voted for a single Great Repub Recession (after Reagan's in 1982, for which I humbly apologize), a single Great Repub Stock Market Crash, a single Massive Repub Jobs Destruction, The Repub / Bush Attack on 9/11, two quagmire, counterproductive Repub Wars in the Middle East based on 900+ Repub Lies, the Historic Financial Crisis, Trump's Historic Trillions added to the deficit with near zero to show for it, Trump's very expensive 1 million fewer jobs created in his first 3 below average economy years in office than the 3 previous years under Obama-Biden, Trump's Pandemic, Trump's Worldwide Economic and Supply-Chain Collapse, Trump's Massive Jobs Losses in the Millions, Trump's 1 million+ Mass Murder of Americans and Millions more around the globe, Trump's 2 Bear Market Declines, Trump's Inflation, Trump's Cop-attacking, Cop-maiming, Cop-killing Insurrection to overturn a free and fair election and overthrow American democracy, Trump and ChristFacist Mike's near victory in outlawing Sex For Pleasure in America, Trump's Spikes in Murder and Crime Rates etc and only for Historic Dem Economic Recoveries and Expansions, Historic Job Gains, Historic Dem Stock Market Gains, Lower Murder and Crime Rates, Infrastructure Improvements, No Great Recessions, No Stock Market Crashes, No Global Pandemic, No Worlwide Economic and Supply-Chain Colapse, No Hyper Inflation, No Quagmire, Counterproductive Wars, etc.
To any of you proud and loud Wingers and you pretend "Bothsider / Neithersiders" who are really Wingers hiding behind that label who DID vote for some or all of the former horrors for America but still have benefitted greatly from my Dem-only votes, I offer you my most heartfelt "You're welcome".
-
7 photos
At this writing
Just a fun recap on the presidential election Consensus of Polls that matter heading into the Republican National Convention on Monday. So they are prior to both conventions and prior to Labor Day, traditionally the points where most voters finally begin to pay attention to a general election.
These figures are also factoring in the 1st Presidential Debate Quiz Show but not yet Biden's post-NATO Summit press conference, which just happened yesterday.
All of these metrics have either remained essentially unchanged or improved for Biden vs pre Presidential Debate Quiz Show.
The No Toss-Up States Electoral College Maps have remained the same for months with Biden needing to add the 3 pictured battleground states to his tally in order to achieve the 270 EVs necessary to win a 2nd term.
Biden already has a strong Ground Game presence in those 3 pictured critical states while Trump does not:
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
All the above considered, particularly the Ground Game advantage for Biden, and assuming the Consensus of Polls is highly accurate (admittedly a huge assumption but typically more likely than any one poll result), it would not be the least bit unrealistic to conclude that Biden would have a very good shot at winning "if the election were held tomorrow", with only Pennsylvania presenting a minor challenge for Biden's Ground Game presence advantage.
-
Yep. Thanks again, Joe.
Neither Trump nor any of his fellow Know Nothing, Do Nothing Repubs have hinted at what on earth they would do to reduce the cost of rent, food, gas, etc that skyrocketed thanks to Trump's Pandemic.
But, like Trump's stated 2nd term plan to "drill baby drill" and his threats to trigger even more and longer Inflation with his "Close the Borders" plan (Biden has already out performed Trump and the rest of the world in oil production and we have the fewest monthly border crossings since Trump got kicked out of the WH), all the heavy lifting and political risk-taking has already been done to accomplish those things by President Joe Biden and his fellow Dems.
LOL. That is THE classic Deadbeat Repub move; to rush in after Dems have done all the very hard work necessary to accomplish good and great things for America to take utterly undeserved and unearned credit for it:
[B]Here's the deflation breakdown for June 2024 in one chart.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/12/heres-the-deflation-breakdown-for-june-2024-in-one-chart.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Deflation measures how quickly prices are declining for consumer goods and services.
Prices have deflated for a range of items like physical goods, airfare, gasoline and some groceries since June 2023, according to the consumer price index.
One explanation: Supply and demand dynamics have normalized after being thrown out of whack during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Inflation has throttled back significantly since peaking two years ago. The U.S. economy is even seeing some prices deflate for consumers.
Deflation measures how quickly prices are falling for a consumer good or service. Its the opposite of inflation, which gauges how quickly prices are increasing.
Physical goods have accounted for much of the deflation over the past year, according to economists. This is happening as supply and demand dynamics that were thrown out of whack in the pandemic normalize.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2929554]
Biden already has a strong Ground Game presence in those 3 pictured critical states while Trump does not:
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
All the above considered, particularly the Ground Game advantage for Biden, and assuming the Consensus of Polls is highly accurate (admittedly a huge assumption but typically more likely than any one poll result), it would not be the least bit unrealistic to conclude that Biden would have a very good shot at winning "if the election were held tomorrow", with only Pennsylvania presenting a minor challenge for Biden's Ground Game presence advantage.[/QUOTE]LOL. You still have Biden in the election. Biden and Harris are dead even in the casino odds. I think Biden is going to try to make the donor class pay through the nose if they want him to step down.
538 no longer has Nate Silver making the calls. [URL]https://mishtalk.com/politics/538-predicts-biden-wins-nate-silver-has-trumps-odds-of-winning-at-72-percent/[/URL].
In a silly forecast, the 538 has Biden a tossup favorite. Nate Silver says Trump has a 72.2 percent chance. That fits in with casino odds where people are betting real money.
The battleground states in most polls are Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada.
Those in play for Trump right now than no one expected to be are Colorado, New Mexico, Minnesota, Virginia, and New Hampshire.
Quite frankly, Trump is right now running a masterful campaign. For once, he has learned to shut up and not make headlines while the Democrats are imploding. The only time he has made news was to shut down the project 2025 nonsense and put out his own list of priorities.
If you do not see Trump is kicking your ass now, Loony Tooms, you need new glasses.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2929330]It seems even more Americans are whining about a corrupt 2/3 conservative Supreme Court, to the tune of a whooping [b]all-time high of 54.4%,[/b] that slightly more than half the country, that don't TRUST or believe in a SCOTUS that has become corrupt, manipulative and bribed by right-wing buddy billionaires.[/QUOTE]Well, this accusation went nowhere. The only reason SCOTUS has this number is the incessant Democratic whining. I would like to ask those who disapprove of the court why they do so, and I bet they could not tell me why. Of course, those of us with working brains wonder how you can be so for "rule of law" when it applies to Donald Trump and show contempt for SCOTUS when they decide how the law should be interpreted.
In fact, if I had to ask those disapproving idiots, what percent of decisions were 9 to 0, I bet they would say none when in reality as of May 8, 2024, [URL]https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/supreme-court-unanimity-is-fleeting-with-tougher-cases-looming-37[/URL].
The court has issued 18 opinions in argued cases so far this term, 15 of which have been unanimous.
The more than 80% figure represents the most harmony at the beginning of a term in the court's modern era, according to Adam Feldman, the creator of the blog Empirical SCOTUS.
Of course, that did not stop the idiot in chief known as AOC from doing the favorite Democratic method of achieving power: filing articles of impeachments and demanding special counsels.
Yes, how dare a Republican dominated SCOTUS give a framework for what presidential immunity is when a Democratic president is in office.
And SCOTUS ruled against Republican district attorneys in the censorship case.
Yes, the communists here want one party rule on everything including SCOTUS. The only SCOTUS that could be fair is nine Democratic judges.
I was just in NYC by the way, and I wrote a friend that if I ever complain about the people in Texas or Colombia to remind me about the people in NYC. I forgot how arrogant they are. They think of themselves as the only intelligent people in the whole country. So of course, they and their judges and attorneys should get together and make up a law to make Trump a criminal.
There is a restaurant owner who opened up Mickey's Place, an Italian restaurant near Amarillo in Canyon, Texas. He left NYC and said the reason he left is that he wanted to be around nice people. So he goes to a place that even Texans think of as fly over country with arguably the worst weather in the state, and he is killing it. The guy's restaurant is super popular and he has made so much money he does not know what to do with it. Apparently, his garbage bill in Texas for a year is less than what it was in NYC for a month.
And heavy hitters keep telling me about how great Amarillo is, so I looked at the Amarillo real estate scene. I asked about the unsafe neighborhoods and was told by person after person there really aren't any unsafe neighborhoods.
I never thought I would see the day that those uber cocky New Yorkers who swear NYC is the greatest place on earth would be moving to ultrared Amarillo, Texas and be bragging about doing so, but it appears to be happening.
-
Si Senor
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2929704]LOL. You still have Biden in the election. Biden and Harris are dead even in the casino odds. I think Biden is going to try to make the donor class pay through the nose if they want him to step down.
538 no longer has Nate Silver making the calls. [URL]https://mishtalk.com/politics/538-predicts-biden-wins-nate-silver-has-trumps-odds-of-winning-at-72-percent/[/URL].
In a silly forecast, the 538 has Biden a tossup favorite. Nate Silver says Trump has a 72.2 percent chance. That fits in with casino odds where people are betting real money.
The battleground states in most polls are Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada.
Those in play for Trump right now than no one expected to be are Colorado, New Mexico, Minnesota, Virginia, and New Hampshire.
Quite frankly, Trump is right now running a masterful campaign. For once, he has learned to shut up and not make headlines while the Democrats are imploding. The only time he has made news was to shut down the project 2025 nonsense and put out his own list of priorities.
If you do not see Trump is kicking your ass now, Loony Tooms, you need new glasses.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/cook-report-six-states-move-toward-trump-in-new-ratings/vi-BB1pLNkM[/URL]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/10/biden-new-york-trouble-00167198[/URL]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/11/democrats-biden-freak-out-blue-states-00167477[/URL]
[URL]https://nypost.com/2024/03/24/us-news/south-american-crime-tourists-infiltrate-at-least-half-of-us-states-to-target-the-rich-thefts-way-way-up/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/05/nyregion/nyc-restaurant-robberies.html[/URL]
-
7 photos
Nate Silver is no Allan Lichtman
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2929704]LOL. You still have Biden in the election. Biden and Harris are dead even in the casino odds. I think Biden is going to try to make the donor class pay through the nose if they want him to step down.
538 no longer has Nate Silver making the calls. [URL]https://mishtalk.com/politics/538-predicts-biden-wins-nate-silver-has-trumps-odds-of-winning-at-72-percent/[/URL].
In a silly forecast, the 538 has Biden a tossup favorite. Nate Silver says Trump has a 72.2 percent chance. That fits in with casino odds where people are betting real money.
The battleground states in most polls are Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada.
Those in play for Trump right now than no one expected to be are Colorado, New Mexico, Minnesota, Virginia, and New Hampshire.
Quite frankly, Trump is right now running a masterful campaign. For once, he has learned to shut up and not make headlines while the Democrats are imploding. The only time he has made news was to shut down the project 2025 nonsense and put out his own list of priorities.
If you do not see Trump is kicking your ass now, Loony Tooms, you need new glasses.[/QUOTE]What was so magical about the old 538 with Nate Silver vs the newer one without him? Have his forecasts been more accurate for all the actual election victories for Dems and underperformance for Repubs in the special elections and the mid-terms in 2018,2019, 2020,2021, 2022,2023 and so far in 2024?
The RCP Consensus Polls for the decisive Battleground states is not that much different than what is on 538 today, except that they have PA at the outer edge of a normal +/-MoE between Biden and Trump, which one might expect with a site like RCP that factors in Push Polls where likely Trumpsters / Repubs are pre-selected for their respondent samples. And they manipulate their updates to keep Trump / Repubs looking pretty there.
Otherwise, the No Toss-Up States EC Maps have remained the same for Biden for months, showing he needs to capture WI, MI and PA to hit 270 EC Votes.
Here is where it stands at 2:30 pm EST USA on the No Toss-Up States EC Maps and 538's Popular Vote, Electoral College Vote and their Forecast for WI, MI and PA, the 3 battleground states Biden needs to add to his current No Toss-Up tally in order to hit 270. Actually, as you can see, their Forecast today is that Biden would get 272 EC Votes:
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
-
The TOP 10 Worst States to Live and Work In? All Red.
Yes, a high crime rate is also factored into what makes these typically Repub Trump Red states the worst places to live and work in the USA:
[B]These are America's 10 worst states for quality of life in 2024.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/13/10-states-worst-quality-of-life-america.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Worker shortages have eased a bit, but companies still look closely at quality of life when choosing a location that will attract skilled employees.
CNBCs annual ranking of state business climates considers quality of life among ten categories of competitiveness.
Quality of Life metrics include Crime, Child Care, Health Care, Environmental Quality, and Inclusiveness.[/QUOTE]I'll spare you the suspense.
With #1 being the Worst State to Live and Work In:
1. Texas.
2. Indiana.
3. Alabama.
4. Oklahoma.
5. Arkansas.
6. Tennessee.
7. Missouri.
8. Louisiana.
9. Kansas.
10. Arizona.
-
His eyesight is fine
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2929704]LOL. You still have Biden in the election. Biden and Harris are dead even in the casino odds. I think Biden is going to try to make the donor class pay through the nose if they want him to step down.
538 no longer has Nate Silver making the calls. [URL]https://mishtalk.com/politics/538-predicts-biden-wins-nate-silver-has-trumps-odds-of-winning-at-72-percent/[/URL].
In a silly forecast, the 538 has Biden a tossup favorite. Nate Silver says Trump has a 72.2 percent chance. That fits in with casino odds where people are betting real money.
The battleground states in most polls are Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Nevada.
Those in play for Trump right now than no one expected to be are Colorado, New Mexico, Minnesota, Virginia, and New Hampshire.
Quite frankly, Trump is right now running a masterful campaign. For once, he has learned to shut up and not make headlines while the Democrats are imploding. The only time he has made news was to shut down the project 2025 nonsense and put out his own list of priorities.
If you do not see Trump is kicking your ass now, Loony Tooms, you need new glasses.[/QUOTE]The lack of quality psych meds in BKK is the issue.
-
LOL. Jake Tapper clearly has Cognitive Impairment.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2929812][URL]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/cook-report-six-states-move-toward-trump-in-new-ratings/vi-BB1pLNkM[/URL]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/10/biden-new-york-trouble-00167198[/URL]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/11/democrats-biden-freak-out-blue-states-00167477[/URL]
[URL]https://nypost.com/2024/03/24/us-news/south-american-crime-tourists-infiltrate-at-least-half-of-us-states-to-target-the-rich-thefts-way-way-up/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/05/nyregion/nyc-restaurant-robberies.html[/URL][/QUOTE]At 3:30 in your first msn / Cook Report link, Jake Tapper asserts with ultimate youthful Mainstream Media News Anchor authority that George Cloony revealed that "the Donald Trump" he saw in the debate is the same "Donald Trump" he saw at the big fund raiser he had for him in LOS Angeles recently.
Oh no. Oh no. Worry, worry, worry. Did George Cloony really have a big fundraiser for Donald Trump recently or are we perhaps witnessing something uh much more uh serious and uh irreversible in Jake Tapper's mental acuity?
And the other lady did not notice and correct him. So she must suffering from senility and dementia too.
Lolol.
BTW, Arizona, Nevada and Georgia, the three states Cook and Tapper are suddenly and breathlessly reporting are heading to Trump's side have been counted on Trump's side in the No Toss-Up States Maps for months already. Biden does not need them to win the 270 EC Votes.
-
The Trump Rally Shooting
WTF. As bad as the Trump rally shooting was, thankfully it was not worse, which it easily could have been. There have been too many sad times like this for America in our lifetimes.
I hate to see shit like that happening in America.
-
American Familes AND Quality of Life matters...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2929715]Well, this accusation went nowhere. The only reason SCOTUS has this number is the incessant Democratic whining. I would like to ask those who disapprove of the court why they do so, and I bet they could not tell me why. Of course, those of us with working brains wonder how you can be so for "rule of law" when it applies to Donald Trump and show contempt for SCOTUS when they decide how the law should be interpreted. [/QUOTE] Yes, I guess it's not surprising a wayward Repub would approve of corruption...Duh!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2929715]In fact, if I had to ask those disapproving idiots, what percent of decisions were 9 to 0, I bet they would say none when in reality as of May 8, 2024, [URL]https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/supreme-court-unanimity-is-fleeting-with-tougher-cases-looming-37[/URL].
The court has issued 18 opinions in argued cases so far this term, 15 of which have been unanimous. ...
Yes, the communists here want one party rule on everything including SCOTUS. The only SCOTUS that could be fair is nine Democratic judges.[/QUOTE] And of those 15 unanimous decisions, probably half actually have a minority decent to them, but were forced/coerced by the majority, so as to have the outward appearance of unanimity and provide a united front in the decision.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2929715]I was just in NYC by the way, ... There is a restaurant owner who opened up Mickey's Place, an Italian restaurant near Amarillo in Canyon, Texas. ...
I never thought I would see the day that those uber cocky New Yorkers who swear NYC is the greatest place on earth would be moving to ultrared Amarillo, Texas and be bragging about doing so, but it appears to be happening.[/QUOTE]
All very nice, but totally useless, anecdotal stories, as they do not represent, unfortunately the experience of the majority of Americans. So if your story is anecdotal of just more dudes moving to Texas, then sure by all means have your sausage fest (...kkkk!).
But with abortion bans, IVF and very soon contraception bans, in red states, destroying women's health, family lives and establishing a family, ever more difficult, is it any wonder many American families are looking to better establish and grow their families in blue states.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2929870]Yes, a high crime rate is also factored into what makes these typically Repub Trump Red states the worst places to live and work in the USA:
[B]These are America's 10 worst states for quality of life in 2024.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/13/10-states-worst-quality-of-life-america.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
I'll spare you the suspense.
With #1 being the Worst State to Live and Work In:
1. Texas.
...[/QUOTE]
Elvis 2008, judging by the latest post, from EihTooms, [b]Texas is #1[/b] and [b]the worst state[/b] to live and work in. Look I'm sure Texas is a great state in many ways, just not great quality of life, or to live, or work, according to the latest from a majority of Americans.
But when you're at the bottom, it all up and onward from there...right? So I'm routing for y'all in Texas. And you and buddy boy, have fun in Texas...ya hear!
-
Additional Info w/r to NCVS and UCR FBI crime data...
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2929870]Okay, and now this is from the WSJ.
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/articles/lies-da...=hp_opin_pos_3#cxrecs_s.[/URL]
The USA Has two measures of crime. The Federal Bureau of Investigation's Uniform Crime Reporting program counts the number of crimes reported to police every year. The Bureau of Justice Statistics, in its National Crime Victimization Survey, asks some 240,000 people a year whether they have been victims of a crime. [b]The two measures have diverged since 2020:[/b] The FBI has been reporting less crime, while more people say they have been victims.
The divergence is due to several reasons. In 2022,31% of police departments nationwide, including LOS Angeles and New York, didn't report crime data to the FBI. In addition, in cities from Baltimore to Nashville, Tenn. , the FBI is undercounting crimes those jurisdictions reported.
Another reason crimes reported to the police are falling is that arrest rates are plummeting. If victims don't believe criminals will be caught and punished, they won't bother reporting them.
End of link. I am cognitively impaired? You just spew out Democratic narratives and could give a rat's ass if they are true. Do you ever have an independent thought in your head? s.[/QUOTE]
BTW, your little puff-piece, entitled [i]"Lies, Damn Lies, and Crime Statistics-Can anyone believe what California politicians say about law and order?"[/i] seemed to be disingenuous, at providing the full picture to crime statistics and seem more interested in smear campaign of Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA).
However, your link (well for me anyways) didn't provide the full-blown article. So the information I now provide, to complete the picture w/r to [b]FBI crime statistics "divergence"[/b], may have been mentioned, in the article , but I doubt it![LIST]1. The FBI can only report on the data it collects.
2. For 100 years the FBI have collected data from police departments throughout the country. The FBI have always had police departments NOT participating, partially participate or provide incomplete and partial data. The most recent complete year 2022, the FBI received data from 83% of participating agencies.
3. The "divergence" between the NCVS and UCR data is a misnomer. AS in 2021, the FBI incorporated [b]a new modernized data collection system[/b] and stopped taking data from the old system, while [u]ONLY ACCEPTING data on the new system[/u].
Hence the 31% jump in police dept. non-participation verses a historical avg. of 17%. As many police departments are still getting up to speed, with the new system requirements. [URL]https://www.themarshallproject.org/2023/07/13/fbi-crime-rates-data-gap-nibrs[/URL]
4. So as police departments, like FL, NY and LA, are gearing up to meet the new FBI system collection requirements, I suspect participation numbers will revert back to historical norms.[/LIST]
With the new system and the FBI looking to collect meaningful data on other crimes, like domestic violence, hate crimes and politically motivated crimes (I think?), it will interesting where the actual upticks in crimes are occurring, that match NCVS data (that does not include sexual assault, BTW).
-
Whispers in PA
And God whispered to Donald to make him turn his head so Donald Shall Be America's 47th President.
-
Or maybe
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2930028]And God whispered to Donald to make him turn his head so Donald Shall Be America's 47th President.[/QUOTE]God would have kept that PA Trump voter alive too if he had really wanted Trump to win and not just reminded by an apparent bullying victim not to be such a bullying asshole.
-
Oh look!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2929903]At 3:30 in your first msn / Cook Report link, Jake Tapper asserts with ultimate youthful Mainstream Media News Anchor authority that George Cloony revealed that "the Donald Trump" he saw in the debate is the same "Donald Trump" he saw at the big fund raiser he had for him in LOS Angeles recently.
Oh no. Oh no. Worry, worry, worry. Did George Cloony really have a big fundraiser for Donald Trump recently or are we perhaps witnessing something uh much more uh serious and uh irreversible in Jake Tapper's mental acuity?
And the other lady did not notice and correct him. So she must suffering from senility and dementia too.
Lolol.
BTW, Arizona, Nevada and Georgia, the three states Cook and Tapper are suddenly and breathlessly reporting are heading to Trump's side have been counted on Trump's side in the No Toss-Up States Maps for months already. Biden does not need them to win the 270 EC Votes.[/QUOTE]NBC's Kristen Welker joins the Jake Tapper, Joe Biden and Everyone Else on the Planet Club in mixing up the names of Presidents and Vice Presidents:
[B]Kristen Welker Needs A Competency Test For Mixing Up Names.[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/cltv/2024/07/kristen-welker-needs-competency-test[/URL]
And, yep, just as it was with Jake Tapper, Welker did it herself right after nit-picking on Biden for doing it AND apparently while she was reading from notes or a teleptompter!
Lolol. Perfect.
-
It is time to cut back on the hate mongering, boys, even if you can't stand Trump.
What a historical week! First Biden self-destructs by revealing the true state of his dementia in the debate and then this assassination attempt on President Trump. It is over boys and girls. Trump is going to be the next President. Get used to it.
But, let's cut to the core of the problem: Every single rational and HONEST American citizen know Trump is not the "devil", he is not a "racist", he is not a "Nazi", and his re-election will not end our democracy. It is all BS. So, right now a message is being sent to Comcast, Disney, CNN, NY Times, Washington Post, ect, ect, ect, and all the demagogue, race baiting, Democrat party politicians: cut this shit out, now. HAHAHA. So, we will see just how long MSNBC, for example, the # 1 hate "propaganda" network in the USA, owned by Comcast, tones down the rhetoric of hate. But money talks and MSNBC / Comcast makes money off hate.
This from the WSJ:
The assassination attempt against Donald Trump on Saturday evening is a horrific moment for America that could have been much worse. But we can't say it comes as a complete surprise. Political hostility and hateful rhetoric have been rising to a decibel level that far too often in the American past has led to violence and attempted murder. Some of us still remember 1968 all too well.
It's nothing short of miraculous that Mr. Trump avoided death by a literal inch. The former President can't help but think that Providence played some role in sparing him, as Ronald Reagan is said to have thought after he was shot and survived in 1981. The country was spared, too, from what could have been a furious cycle of retribution.
Yet a man was killed and two others seriously wounded at a rally that was supposed to celebrate their political allegiance and democratic participation. The Secret Service killed the alleged assassin, but the obvious question is how he could have gained the high ground atop a building near enough to be able to take those shots at the former President. Mr. Trump's rallies are severe security tests, but the Secret Service has had years to know how to protect him at these events.
It isn't enough to say the shooter was outside the security perimeter of metal detectors and bag searches. The motivations of the alleged shooteridentified by law enforcement early Sunday as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks of Bethel Park, Pa. And whether he had accomplices may tell us more about how he was able to get in close shooting range.
But the leaders of the Secret Service have some explaining to do. Transparency in the investigation will be critical to avoid the spread of conspiracy theories on the right and left. On Saturday night social media was full of anti-Trump posters saying the shooting was staged to help his campaign.
President Biden spoke to the country from his weekend home in Delaware, as he should have done, and he properly denounced "political violence. " So did leaders of both political parties. But the statements will amount to little if they aren't followed with a change in behavior and rhetoric.
The shooter alone is responsible for his actions. But leaders on both sides need to stop describing the stakes of the election in apocalyptic terms. Democracy won't end if one or the other candidate is elected. Fascism is not aborning if Mr. Trump wins, unless you have little faith in American institutions.
We agree with former Attorney General Bill Barr's statement Saturday night: "The Democrats have to stop their grossly irresponsible talk about Trump being an existential threat to democracyhe is not. ".
One great risk is that the shooting in Butler, Pa. , will cause some on the right to seek violent revenge. This is where Mr. Trump and the Republicans have an obligationand a political opportunityat their convention in Milwaukee and through November.
If they weren't already, Americans after Saturday will be looking for stable, reassuring leadership. The photo of Mr. Trump raising his fist as he was led off stage by the Secret Service with a bloody face was a show of personal fortitude that will echo through the campaign. No one doubts his willingness to fight, and his initial statement Saturday night was a notable and encouraging show of restraint and gratitude.
His opportunity now is to present himself as someone who can rise above the attack on his life and unite the country. He will make a mistake if he blames Democrats for the assassination attempt.
He will win over more Americans if he tells his followers that they need to fight peacefully and within the system. If the Trump campaign is smart, and thinking about the country as well as the election, it will make the theme of Milwaukee a call to political unity and the better angels of American nature.
That leaves plenty of room for criticizing Democrats and their failed policies. But the country wants civil disagreement and discourse, not civil war.
The near assassination of Donald Trump could be a moment that catalyzes more hatred and an even worse cycle of violence. If that is how it goes, God help us.
Or it could be a redemptive moment that leads to introspection and political debate that is fierce but not cast as Armageddon. The country was spared the worst on Saturday and this is a chance to pull out of a partisan death spiral. That is the leadership Americans are desperate to see.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2929953]WTF. As bad as the Trump rally shooting was, thankfully it was not worse, which it easily could have been. There have been too many sad times like this for America in our lifetimes.I hate to see shit like that happening in America.[/QUOTE]I have been asking what it would take for guys like you and Spidy to actually condemn those attacking Trump. There seems to be a contest on how bad of things you all can say about Trump. I am glad that you are finally at a limit, but I still do not think you get what has happened and what is happening.
First off, MSNBC and CNN said Trump fell down versus was shot and took cover. In other words, the first thing those news organizations did was try to equate Trump's getting shot with Biden and his frequent falls.
Second, a Trump assassination was always assumed to be a logical outcome for so many Republicans. Tucker Carlson came right out and said it.
Third, this is going to be swept up into a lone gunman night thing when it was not. The Biden administration has been accused of wanting its political opposition dead. The primary point with that being that RFK Jr. Was denied secret service protection.
[URL]https://mishtalk.com/politics/the-secret-service-failed-its-only-mission-biden-should-fire-the-director/[/URL]
There is a lot to unpack in this article. To me, the worst of it are things said by former agents and the videos that show how the Biden administration was more concerned with DEI numbers than competent agents. I would like to see it confirmed that those in attendance did go to the police about this sniper, but even if they are lying, there is no excuse per the former agents to not lock down areas where you can get an easy shot at a target like this.
Then there is the video comparing the response with Trump to that with Reagan. It is painful to watch. And the video showing the women protecting Trump is just as bad.
Again, you Dems are going to go out there with this one lone gunman as a nut versus seeing the truth, that with a competent SS detail, this shooter would have been apprehended before he ever got a shot off.
The real issue is what to do now. Is RFK Jr going to get SS protection? And is Biden going to fire the head of the SS? So let me be clear, this assassination attempt is a complete failure by SS that is being run by the Biden administration. The question now is: will the Biden administration do anything about it? If they do not, the charge that they want their political opponents dead is going to ring more true than ever.
-
ISG Repubs, show no sympathy...but instead, RELISHED the Trump shooting?
Yeah, to the victims in any shooting, it goes without saying (but should always be said), that just like the unfortunate murders of children, at Sandy Hook and Uvalde schools, by right-wing gunman with AR-15 rifles, thoughts and prayers, go out to the victim(s) and their families in the shooting.
[U]Repub depravity at its best:[/U]
But it's soooo funny, how many Repubs crawl out from under a rock, to suddenly show-up to post, just to pontificate, bombast and boast about, how the Trump shooting [i](in all likelihood, a shooter that is a known registered Republican)[/i], should somehow magically, give Trump the win in Nov 2024.
And YET, none of YOU Repub cockroaches, have written anything resembling sympathy, condolences, thoughtfulness or commiseration for the victim(s) or families, in the shooting. [i][b]In fact, y'all Repubs, seem to [u]relish[/u] the fact he was shoot at!!![/b][/i]
And how the devil mysteriously, moved Trump's head in the nick of time. And yet still, no concerns for the death of one of your own supporters, by a rogue AR-15 gunman.
EihTooms, has been the only one (prior to my post), that even looked to commiserate the victim(s) and condone the level of vitriol and violence, we find ourselves facing, once again.
Meanwhile you Repub cockroaches, are simply looking, at how this shooting will immensely benefit the Trump campaign. 'Tis a sad time indeed!
[u]Passing Thought:[/u]
However, I was surprised and somewhat perplexed, at how quickly he and SS got up and yet had the time to raise up and pump a [b]"Black Power"[/b] fist in the air, for a photo opt, rather than ducking and scrambling for cover to be whisked away, under the security of the SS, in the dire case, there was perhaps [b]multiple shooters?[/b] Hmmmm...
Let's not forget, [i][b]this is the same man, [u]who staged[/u] an attempted coup[/b][/i] on J6!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2930204]Yeah, to the victims in any shooting, it goes without saying (but should always be said), that just like the unfortunate murders of children, at Sandy Hook and Uvalde schools, by right-wing gunman with AR-15 rifles, thoughts and prayers, go out to the victim(s) and their families in the shooting.
[U]Repub depravity at its best:[/U]
But it's soooo funny, how many Repubs crawl out from under a rock, to suddenly show-up to post, just to pontificate, bombast and boast about, how the Trump shooting [i](in all likelihood, a shooter that is a known registered Republican)[/i], should somehow magically, give Trump the win in Nov 2024.
And YET, none of YOU Repub cockroaches, have written anything resembling sympathy, condolences, thoughtfulness or commiseration for the victim(s) or families, in the shooting. [i][b]In fact, y'all Repubs, seem to [u]relish[/u] the fact he was shoot at!!![/b][/i]
And how the devil mysteriously, moved Trump's head in the nick of time. And yet still, no concerns for the death of one of your own supporters, by a rogue AR-15 gunman.
EihTooms, has been the only one (prior to my post), that even looked to commiserate the victim(s) and condone the level of vitriol and violence, we find ourselves facing, once again.
Meanwhile you Repub cockroaches, are simply looking, at how this shooting will immensely benefit the Trump campaign. 'Tis a sad time indeed!
[u]Passing Thought:[/u]
However, I was surprised and somewhat perplexed, at how quickly he and SS got up and yet had the time to raise up and pump a [b]"Black Power"[/b] fist in the air, for a photo opt, rather than ducking and scrambling for cover to be whisked away, under the security of the SS, in the dire case, there was perhaps [b]multiple shooters?[/b] Hmmmm...
Let's not forget, [i][b]this is the same man, [u]who staged[/u] an attempted coup[/b][/i] on J6![/QUOTE]Yeah, this is the response I expected from a douche like you. Tooms actually showed class and you did not. Of course, our thoughts and prayers are with the victims, but there is anger too directed at the SS and to Democratic douches like yourself that honestly want this to happen. Just admit it you fucking low life douche, you would be happy if Trump were killed in this accident. And what does that say about you and Democracy?
-
Get help
[QUOTE=Spidy;2930204] this dude thinks "cockroaches" who disagree with him are lower morally than huim, even if he is devid of morality or the capacity to think![/QUOTE]Last I chekded, the Gofubndme for the victims was in 7 figures. How much did you and Hunter give? Here is your chance, Mr Big Mouth [URL]https://www.gofundme.com/f/president-trump-seeks-support-for-butler-pa-victims[/URL].
-
1 photos
Would pathological liar Trump even lie about this?
Yes, pathological liar Trump could and most certainly would lie even about this.
A bullet? Or glass shards, as was hinted at soon after the incident?
-
Oh please!
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2930089]But, let's cut to the core of the problem: Every single rational and HONEST American citizen know Trump is not the "devil", he is not a "racist", he is not a "Nazi", and his re-election will not end our democracy. It is all BS. So, right now a message is being sent to Comcast, Disney, CNN, NY Times, Washington Post, ect, ect, ect, and all the demagogue, race baiting, Democrat party politicians: cut this shit out, now. HAHAHA. So, we will see just how long MSNBC, for example, the # 1 hate "propaganda" network in the USA, owned by Comcast, tones down the rhetoric of hate. But money talks and MSNBC / Comcast makes money off hate.[/QUOTE]You know what? He brought this upon himself! He came out of the gates spreading hate the day he came down that escalator talking shit! And how many times has he talked about using violence at his rallies? We all know a lot! Like I said before. What goes around comes around. He reaped what he sowed, and he's lucky he wasn't killed. All these Republicans on TV talking about "this was an attack on democracy". Well what the fuck was January 6th? I've said before that this is not a game. This is not a joke. It's not just some theoretical bullshit that we go around and around and around with on the internet. This is some for real shit where people not only get injured, but killed! An innocent man took a bullet to the head that was meant for Trump. Cut the crap on both sides! All this talk about "turning the heat down". Well, the Republicans have a perfect chance to do that this week at their convention. Let's see if they do it. Let them go first. And remember we have no clue why some demented 20 year-old tried to kill Trump. Blaming it on Biden or what some Democrat said is, to borrow from another member here, just more of the same old Repukian "doucebag" behavior. In any event, nothing that's happened changes who and what Trump has been. He's shown us repeatedly who he is. So, we need to believe him. Anti-democracy. Anti-rule of law. Anti-peaceful transfer of power. Twice impeached for his behavior as President. Admires tyrants like Putin over our allies. And an all around liar. [B]Which leaves him unfit for office[/B]! He is who he is. He did what he did, including incite violence. And so here we now are.
-
Absolutely true
[QUOTE=TheCane;2930257]You know what? He brought this upon himself! He came out of the gates spreading hate the day he came down that escalator talking shit! And how many times has he talked about using violence at his rallies? We all know a lot! Like I said before. What goes around comes around. He reaped what he sowed, and he's lucky he wasn't killed. All these Republicans on TV talking about "this was an attack on democracy". Well what the fuck was January 6th? I've said before that this is not a game. This is not a joke. It's not just some theoretical bullshit that we go around and around and around with on the internet. This is some for real shit where people not only get injured, but killed! An innocent man took a bullet to the head that was meant for Trump. Cut the crap on both sides! All this talk about "turning the heat down". Well, the Republicans have a perfect chance to do that this week at their convention. Let's see if they do it. Let them go first. And remember we have no clue why some demented 20 year-old tried to kill Trump. Blaming it on Biden or what some Democrat said is, to borrow from another member here, just more of the same old Repukian "doucebag" behavior. In any event, nothing that's happened changes who and what Trump has been. He's shown us repeatedly who he is. So, we need to believe him. Anti-democracy. Anti-rule of law. Anti-peaceful transfer of power. Twice impeached for his behavior as President. Admires tyrants like Putin over our allies. And an all around liar. [B]Which leaves him unfit for office[/B]! He is who he is. He did what he did, including incite violence. And so here we now are.[/QUOTE]None of this changes the fact that Joe Biden is infinitely more lucid, well informed, cognitively capable and fit to be President than Trump or any other Repub.
LOL. Where is the Mainstream Media demand for Trump to spend a no notes press conference hour with that same crowd Biden faced on USA foreign policy and state of the world. Lololol. Unimaginable.
And the exact same thing could be said regarding Biden vs Trump on the Economy, Jobs Creation, Infrastructure Legislation, Energy Independence, Reducing Crime or anything else.
And it does not change the fact that Trump is more responsible than any other person on the planet for laying the foundation for, exacerbating and deeply worsening his Trump's Pandemic and the million Americans and more around the globe that his horrific 2018,2019 and 2020 economic and national security decisions mass murdered, the worldwide economic and supply chain collapse, the millions of jobs destroyed, business and school closures, the Inflation, skyrocketing costs for rent, food and gas etc that followed.
I am only against responding to Trump's historically Worst President with the Worst Results in History and Unprecedented Crimes Against America with Vigilante Justice. That's all.
-
1 photos
Fake News!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2930250]Yes, pathological liar Trump could and most certainly would lie even about this.
A bullet? Or glass shards, as was hinted at soon after the incident?[/QUOTE]It's "fake news"! Remember that?
-
God you say?
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2930028]And God whispered to Donald to make him turn his head so Donald Shall Be America's 47th President.[/QUOTE]So, your God whispered into the ear of Donald the philandering con-man but when there were innocent children getting shot up in Uvalde and Sandy Hook, your God just shook his head, couldn't be bothered and said "Not my problem". Good luck selling that bit of partisan lunacy.
-
He brought this upon himself!
[QUOTE=TheCane;2930257] He brought this upon himself! [/QUOTE]Ok Cane. I get it. If this is what you truly want to believe, that's the end of our discussion. But before I put you on my ignore list, surely, you must realize that in your post you are clearly blaming the victim (President Trump) for being shot. Which is insane. It is inexcusable.
And what about Corey Comperatore? A logical deduction from your post is that Corey is to blame for his own assassination because he dared to go to a Trump Rally. Think about.
A. H.
-
6 photos
This does not look like Biden is getting his ass kicked. Just sayin'
This week's 538 Consensus of Polls update.
The No Toss-Up States Electoral College Map remains the same with Biden's best chance to win still being to add WI, MI and PA to his tally in order to capture the 270 EVs needed to win re-election.
At this writing, Biden has improved his lead over Trump vs last week regarding the consensus on his Chances of Winning (52 times out of 100 vs Trump's 47), his Electoral College Vote win (now at 274 vs Trump's 264) along with an expansion of his Consensus Popular Vote advantage to 2.5 points:
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
-
What Now? Condolences...is your conscience relieved?
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2930215]Yeah, this is the response I expected from a douche like you. Tooms actually showed class and you did not. [/QUOTE] YES, the Dems posting here, did show class! Being only ones that showed thoughtfulness to the victims (incl. Trump), is very much an indictment on you, Repubs and how you care nothing for fellow Americans of any stripe.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2930215] Of course, [b]our thoughts and prayers[/b] are with the victims,[/QUOTE] (...kkkk!) Yeah, after I called you deprived thoughtless Repubs OUT!
You provided it, like an after thought. As if the lives of the victims, are something trivial and cannon fodder for the "cause". [b]If you REALLY meant it[/b], you would have written it and said so in your first post. YOU DIDN'T!!!! Because you weren't thinking of your fellow Americans in their time of grief!
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2930215] but there is anger too directed at the SS and to Democratic douches like yourself that honestly want this to happen.[/QUOTE] (...kkkk!) Yeah, right! Nice narrative your trying to push! May I, again remind you of the staged, J6 insurrection and coup?
[u][b]In this episode of "Paycheck Superhero":[/b][/u]
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;2930215] Just admit it you fucking low life douche, you would be happy if Trump were killed in this accident. And what does that say about you and Democracy?[/QUOTE]
It seems "Paycheck Superhero", grief stricken [i][b]backpedaling[/b][/i] has him feeling a tad bit embarrassed, as the supervillains, not only are first to pay their respects to the victims of crime, but have shamed him, for NOT doing his job as the superhero, he claims to be.
[u]Stay tuned to find out:[/u]
• If "Paycheck Superhero"', really does "sympathy" at all, or is it does a brave front?
• If "Paycheck Superhero"'s very late, but welcomed condolences to the victims of crime, will save his tarnished superhero crime fighting status?
Stay Tuned...
-
1 photos
Anyway.
I hate the assassination attempt and all the Hate and Lies that Spewed for 8+ Years from the mainstream scumbag media, Fake president Biden, the dem congress and other scumbags -- At least they are pretending that they are sorry they said it or pretending they never said anything-- How long shall that last?
The Upside is Donald J Trump Shall Be Our Next President.
-
Huh?
[QUOTE=Jarango;2930216] " Quote Originally Posted by [b]Spidy[/b] [View Original Post] this dude thinks "cockroaches" who disagree with him are lower morally than huim, even if he is devid of morality or the capacity to think!"
Last I chekded, the Gofubndme for the victims was in 7 figures. How much did you and Hunter give? Here is your chance, Mr Big Mouth [URL]https://www.gofundme.com/f/president-trump-seeks-support-for-butler-pa-victims[/URL].[/QUOTE] Dude, at the very least, [i][b]"...PLEASE QUOTE ME ACCURATELY"[/b][/i] ...duh!
...N'est-ce pas, mon ami?
[b]PS:[/b] Yes, the fund is a really good thing and will ease some of the pain. But it doesn't bring back a loved one, lost senselessly, to a violence crime. Nor justify, nor ease the level of vitriol and violence. Money can't justify everything!
-
Wow. Biden just improved his chances and EC vote Consensus again
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2930316]This week's 538 Consensus of Polls update.
The No Toss-Up States Electoral College Map remains the same with Biden's best chance to win still being to add WI, MI and PA to his tally in order to capture the 270 EVs needed to win re-election.
At this writing, Biden has improved his lead over Trump vs last week regarding the consensus on his Chances of Winning (52 times out of 100 vs Trump's 47), his Electoral College Vote win (now at 274 vs Trump's 264) along with an expansion of his Consensus Popular Vote advantage to 2.5 points:
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL][/QUOTE]Just since I posted the above, Biden has increased his chances of winning on that site's Consensus to 53 out of 100 and his Electoral College take to 276 vs Trump's 262. See link in my previous post quoted above.
It might be hard to keep up with Biden's minute by minute improvement in his Consensus standing while the Republican National Convention is raging on.
-
1 photos
Unbelievable
If the assassination attempt is fake news than why are you using an edited photo to make your point? Obviously, the truth means nothing to you. But thanks for the posting. It says everything I need to know about your character.
AND BTW, the unaltered, unedited Trump Assassination photo, the real one, which I have attached to this post is, without a doubt, the most instantly iconic photo of the 21st century. Forgetabout your political bent for 10 seconds. If you cannot realize what the impact this photo is going to have on the election, you might as well be blind. But I think you do know what the impact of the photo is going to be which is why you could not help yourself, KKK, and posted the altered photo.
Bye Bye, see you at the inauguration.
A. H.
-
Cancel Culture
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2930296]Ok Cane. I get it. If this is what you truly want to believe, that's the end of our discussion. But before I put you on my ignore list, surely, you must realize that in your post you are clearly blaming the victim (President Trump) for being shot. Which is insane. It is inexcusable.
And what about Corey Comperatore? A logical deduction from your post is that Corey is to blame for his own assassination because he dared to go to a Trump Rally. Think about.
A. H.[/QUOTE]Yeah, who's practicing cancel culture now? And how about you read and try to comprehend what I wrote? I stated very clearly that an entirely innocent man (that would be Comperatore) was shot in the head and killed. So if you want to try making "logical deductions" then how about starting with some logic? Or simply read what I wrote. And yes, I do blame Trump for the ratcheting up of political violence in this country. As the president he had the bully pulpit. He set the tone by saying things like "there's good people on both sides" (apparently even when one side includes undeniable racists). He told the Proud Boys to "stand back and stand by" on live, national television. And he egged on a mob to attack the very seat of American democracy. And this is just a little bit. How about the time he said somebody at a rally should be carried out on a stretcher? So you see, you're damn right he's responsible because he's his own worst enemy. What goes around comes around. You reap what you sow! So go ahead and put me on ignore if you will. I'll still be able to read your Brazil posts if I want to. I like them, and I will. It's really true isn't it? If you want to get along then don't argue about politics, sex, or religion!
-
Some will always try to gaslight Trump's History of Racism...Who knows why?
[QUOTE=The Cane;2930257] ...He brought this upon himself! [/QUOTE] Yes, quite right, indeed!
Not sure why it is, some others will always try to defend Trump's blatant racism, but it's always good to set the record straight.
For those not convinced, Trump bears a good deal of the responsibility and violence, associated in his unfortunate shooting incident, should take a good look at the following timeline of incited hatred spewed by the felon, con-man, charlatan, pussy-grabber, porn-star fucker and ex-Pres.
[LIST] VOX - [b]Donald Trump is the accelerant[/b] - A comprehensive timeline of Trump encouraging hate groups and political violence.
[i]On the very day that Congress counted the electoral votes that certified President-elect Joe Biden's victory, Trump opened up the US Capitol to an insurrection. He told a crowd rallying south of the White House to walk down to the Capitol, adding, You will never take back our country with weakness. ...
As far back as 2015, Trump has been connected to documented acts of violence, with perpetrators claiming that he was even their inspiration. In fact, dozens of people enacted violence in Trumps name in the years before the Capitol attack, according to a 2020 report from ABC News.
In 2016, a white man told officers Donald Trump will fix them while being arrested for threatening his Black neighbors with a knife. That same year, a Florida man threatened to burn down a house next to his because a Muslim family purchased it, claiming that Trumps Muslim ban made it a reason for concern. Then there are the more widely known examples, like Cesar Sayoc, who mailed 16 inoperative pipe bombs to Democratic leaders and referred to Trump as a surrogate father; and the mass shooting in El Paso, Texas, in 2019 that left 23 dead, where the shooters manifesto parroted Trumps rhetoric about immigrants.
In some cases, Trump [u]denounces the violence[/u], [b]but he often walks back such statements[/b], returning to a message of hate and harm. In August, he defended a teenage supporter who shot three people at a Black Lives Matter protest.And at the first presidential debate of the 2020 election, the president shocked many viewers when he was given an opportunity to condemn white supremacists, but declined.
In October, he equivocated on condemnation of the domestic terrorists who allegedly planned to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, after Trump had stoked outrage over the states pandemic safety measures. He criticized Whitmer when the kidnapping plot was revealed and fished for compliments.
Trump has continually refused to recognize whats at the core of this violence: [b]hate nurtured under a tense national climate that he has helped cultivate.[/b]
[b]2015: Trump announces his presidential bid and quickly suggests violence is the answer to opposition.[/b]
Trump officially announced his candidacy for president of the United States in June 2015 and wasted little time inciting fear and hate in his first speech. That year, critics argued that his language led to attacks on bystanders, and in some cases, acts of violence were directly linked to Trumps words.
...
[URL]https://www.vox.com/21506029/trump-violence-tweets-racist-hate-speech[/URL][/i][/LIST]Still not convinced? Take a look here:
[B]Donald Trumps long history of racism, from the 1970s to 2020[/B] - Trump has repeatedly claimed he's "the least racist person. " His history suggests otherwise.
[URL]https://www.vox.com/2016/7/25/12270880/donald-trump-racist-racism-history[/URL]
-
The Oppotunist
JD Vance, like so many people (including plenty right here), knows the real truth about Donald Trump. But instead, he allows his political ambitions to compromise his personal values. How despicable! And how sad.
[URL]https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-vp-choice-jd-vance-running-mate-b2578227.html[/URL]
-
The least racist candidate just chose a white male for his VP
[QUOTE=Spidy;2930396]Yes, quite right, indeed!
Not sure why it is, some others will always try to defend Trump's blatant racism, but it's always good to set the record straight.
For those not convinced, Trump bears a good deal of the responsibility and violence, associated in his unfortunate shooting incident, should take a good look at the following timeline of incited hatred spewed by the felon, con-man, charlatan, pussy-grabber, porn-star fucker and ex-Pres.
[LIST] VOX - [b]Donald Trump is the accelerant[/b] - A comprehensive timeline of Trump encouraging hate groups and political violence.
[i]On the very day that Congress counted the electoral votes that certified President-elect Joe Biden's victory, Trump opened up the US Capitol to an insurrection. He told a crowd rallying south of the White House to walk down to the Capitol, adding, You will never take back our country with weakness. ...
As far back as 2015, Trump has been connected to documented acts of violence, with perpetrators claiming that he was even their inspiration. In fact, dozens of people enacted violence in Trumps name in the years before the Capitol attack, according to a 2020 report from ABC News.
In 2016, a white man told officers Donald Trump will fix them while being arrested for threatening his Black neighbors with a knife. That same year, a Florida man threatened to burn down a house next to his because a Muslim family purchased it, claiming that Trumps Muslim ban made it a reason for concern. Then there are the more widely known examples, like Cesar Sayoc, who mailed 16 inoperative pipe bombs to Democratic leaders and referred to Trump as a surrogate father; and the mass shooting in El Paso, Texas, in 2019 that left 23 dead, where the shooters manifesto parroted Trumps rhetoric about immigrants.
In some cases, Trump [u]denounces the violence[/u], [b]but he often walks back such statements[/b], returning to a message of hate and harm. In August, he defended a teenage supporter who shot three people at a Black Lives Matter protest.And at the first presidential debate of the 2020 election, the president shocked many viewers when he was given an opportunity to condemn white supremacists, but declined.
In October, he equivocated on condemnation of the domestic terrorists who allegedly planned to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, after Trump had stoked outrage over the states pandemic safety measures. He criticized Whitmer when the kidnapping plot was revealed and fished for compliments.
Trump has continually refused to recognize whats at the core of this violence: [b]hate nurtured under a tense national climate that he has helped cultivate.[/b]
[b]2015: Trump announces his presidential bid and quickly suggests violence is the answer to opposition.[/b]
Trump officially announced his candidacy for president of the United States in June 2015 and wasted little time inciting fear and hate in his first speech. That year, critics argued that his language led to attacks on bystanders, and in some cases, acts of violence were directly linked to Trumps words.
...
[URL]https://www.vox.com/21506029/trump-violence-tweets-racist-hate-speech[/URL][/i][/LIST]Still not convinced? Take a look here:
[B]Donald Trumps long history of racism, from the 1970s to 2020[/B] - Trump has repeatedly claimed he's "the least racist person. " His history suggests otherwise.
[URL]https://www.vox.com/2016/7/25/12270880/donald-trump-racist-racism-history[/URL][/QUOTE]Apparently, it was not possible for Trump to find a non white male or a woman who would absolutely and without hesitation agree to violate whatever silly Oath of Office he / she took or the USA Constitution and instead follow Trump's criminal orders explicitly at any and all times.
But Vance did.
Everyone kniws that was the #1 requirement to be Trump's running mate in 2024.
But that doesn't prove Trump is a racist. We have his long history of racist moves since the 1970's for that, as you cited and linked above.
It really only further proves he is an America-hating, democracy-hating wannabe authoritarian dictator. Vance used to point that out about him too. But now he keeps his mouth shut about it.
Oh, I do see that at the end of the day Trump might have gotten a 1 point assassination attempt bump, a 1 point RNC nomination bump or perhaps it was a 1 point Judge Marjorie Taylor Cannon decision to create the ultimate delay on his "critical classified document retaining despite being requested to return them" trial.
This is a fluid contest, nobody is "kicking" anyone's ass at this point, least of all Trump "kicking" Biden's ass in the Consensus of Polls lately.
Meanwhile, it was hilarious to see the Repub Squeaker of the Pink Tinkle and Getting Smaller All the Time House, ChristoFacist Mike, totally lose it and not know wtf to say about whoever it was he was "honored" to introduce at the Dumb Repub Hillbilly (now literally) Rally today:
[B]Watch: Mike Johnson Freaks Out as RNC Teleprompter Breaks Down.
The Republican National Convention, which convened to nominate Donald Trump, is off to a shaky start.[/B]
[URL]https://newrepublic.com/post/183853/mike-johnson-rnc-teleprompter-trump[/URL]
[QUOTE]An apparent teleprompter malfunction, which sent House Speaker Mike Johnson scurrying off-stage at the Republican National Convention Monday afternoon, launched the high-stakes political event into a welcome new phase: cover band concert.
It is now my honor to introduce the attorney general, Johnson began haltingly. And there goes the teleprompter.
Johnson awkwardly made his exit. Meanwhile, Sixwire, a country-rock band based out of Nashville, Tennessee, performed a rendition of Steely Dans Reelin In the Years. A livestream of the main room showed clumps of blonde women dressed in bright red and waving their Trump signs, and white guys nodding their heads to the beat.
After the song ended, the band just kept going, and going, and going, riffing on the songs iconic guitar melody. Some say theyre still vamping to this day.[/QUOTE]LOL. Add ChristoFacist Mike to the list of every other Repub who would not fare as well without a teleprompter as Joe Biden and, in fact, do not fare as well WITH notes and a teleprompter in terms of content, smoothness and obvious cognitive acuity and understanding of every nuance in the message.
-
A Man of Destiny
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2930334]I hate the assassination attempt and all the Hate and Lies that Spewed for 8+ Years from the mainstream scumbag media, Fake president Biden, the dem congress and other scumbags -- At least they are pretending that they are sorry they said it or pretending they never said anything-- How long shall that last?
The Upside is Donald J Trump Shall Be Our Next President.[/QUOTE]Ross is easily thee most talented writer by light years at the NYT
Ok I know that's a very very low bar but nonetheless.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/15/opinion/donald-trump-assassination-destiny.html[/URL]
"He just turned an attempted assassination into a Renaissance painting of bloodied defiance.".
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2024/07/14/rep-bennie-thompson-field-director-no-longer-employed-after-cheering-trump-shooting/[/URL]
[URL]https://highlandcountypress.com/opinions/secret-service-scuffle-prompts-dei-vetting-scrutiny[/URL]#gsc. Tab=0.
-
Hilarious the gaslighter in chief is calling others gaslighters, project much?
[QUOTE=Spidy;2930396]Yes, quite right, indeed!
Not sure why it is, some others will always try to defend Trump's blatant racism, but it's always good to set the record straight.
For those not convinced, Trump bears a good deal of the responsibility and violence, associated in his unfortunate shooting incident, should take a good look at the following timeline of incited hatred spewed by the felon, con-man, charlatan, pussy-grabber, porn-star fucker and ex-Pres.
[LIST] VOX - [b]Donald Trump is the accelerant[/b] - A comprehensive timeline of Trump encouraging hate groups and political violence.
[i]On the very day that Congress counted the electoral votes that certified President-elect Joe Biden's victory, Trump opened up the US Capitol to an insurrection. He told a crowd rallying south of the White House to walk down to the Capitol, adding, You will never take back our country with weakness. ...
As far back as 2015, Trump has been connected to documented acts of violence, with perpetrators claiming that he was even their inspiration. In fact, dozens of people enacted violence in Trumps name in the years before the Capitol attack, according to a 2020 report from ABC News.
In 2016, a white man told officers Donald Trump will fix them while being arrested for threatening his Black neighbors with a knife. That same year, a Florida man threatened to burn down a house next to his because a Muslim family purchased it, claiming that Trumps Muslim ban made it a reason for concern. Then there are the more widely known examples, like Cesar Sayoc, who mailed 16 inoperative pipe bombs to Democratic leaders and referred to Trump as a surrogate father; and the mass shooting in El Paso, Texas, in 2019 that left 23 dead, where the shooters manifesto parroted Trumps rhetoric about immigrants.
In some cases, Trump [u]denounces the violence[/u], [b]but he often walks back such statements[/b], returning to a message of hate and harm. In August, he defended a teenage supporter who shot three people at a Black Lives Matter protest.And at the first presidential debate of the 2020 election, the president shocked many viewers when he was given an opportunity to condemn white supremacists, but declined.
In October, he equivocated on condemnation of the domestic terrorists who allegedly planned to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, after Trump had stoked outrage over the states pandemic safety measures. He criticized Whitmer when the kidnapping plot was revealed and fished for compliments.
Trump has continually refused to recognize whats at the core of this violence: [b]hate nurtured under a tense national climate that he has helped cultivate.[/b]
[b]2015: Trump announces his presidential bid and quickly suggests violence is the answer to opposition.[/b]
Trump officially announced his candidacy for president of the United States in June 2015 and wasted little time inciting fear and hate in his first speech. That year, critics argued that his language led to attacks on bystanders, and in some cases, acts of violence were directly linked to Trumps words.
...
[URL]https://www.vox.com/21506029/trump-violence-tweets-racist-hate-speech[/URL][/i][/LIST]Still not convinced? Take a look here:
[B]Donald Trumps long history of racism, from the 1970s to 2020[/B] - Trump has repeatedly claimed he's "the least racist person. " His history suggests otherwise.
[URL]https://www.vox.com/2016/7/25/12270880/donald-trump-racist-racism-history[/URL][/QUOTE][URL]https://spectator.org/cartoon/what-could-have-caused-the-trump-shooting/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2930370] So you see, you're damn right he's responsible because he's his own worst enemy. What goes around comes around. You reap what you sow! So go ahead and put me on ignore if you will. I'll still be able to read your Brazil posts if I want to. I like them, and I will. It's really true isn't it? If you want to get along then don't argue about politics, sex, or religion! [/QUOTE]Hey Cane, your last sentence makes sense especially the part referring to politics and religion. But if you, I, or anybody want to really debate politics in a serious way, it is imperative to keep it civil and refrain from ad hominem personal attacks unless you want to end up in a brawl. This is simple courtesy and respect debate rule #101, but unfortunately there have been far too many personal attacks from both sides and the vibe in America is toxic and getting worse. Wasn't Joe supposed to be the unifier president?
So it has been a rough and tumble couple of weeks, that is for sure. First the amazing debate, then the assassination attempt, and now it is Milwaukee. I honestly believe that as a result of these last weeks we are about to witness a tectonic shift in our politics which is something I find it very interesting. In fact, I am looking forward to it. Now which one of the resident lefties here want to personally attack me for saying / thinking this? UHM?
Anyway, I started the current round of back and forth with a let's cut back on the hate rhetoric. It was nothing that heavy really, just a version of "can't we try to get a long," KKK, but I know that ain't going to happen. So, we locked horns. I said what I wanted to say, you said what you wanted to say, and nothing was achieved, so I am going back to what interests me on the ISG: namely talking about girls, girls & more girls!
But make no mistake, I am not conceding the argument. In fact, I think you lost the argument with the 1st sentence in your opening salvo this morning. The Trump deserved it comment was way, way out there and you should know better. I. E. You can't expect to have any kind of civil debate after you throw a hand grenade like that into the discussion two days after an attempted assassination. As Biden always says, "Come on, Man!" How would you have responded to a similar comment if it had been Biden at the wrong end of an assassin's rifle?
P.S. I read and like your posts in the Brazil forum too, so what the fuck! Fighting over politics is total BS. Vote for whomever you like, once, and let the best man, Trump, win.
-
Trump says he is rewiting his RNC speech
Well, somebody is supposedly rewiting it for him. They better have triple backup on those teleprompters that keep acting up or it'll be a long night of Electrified Shark Tales. Did they have to take the worst teleprompter service available after the more competent ones refused to get stiffed again on their payment by Trump and his fellow Repub Deadbeats?
Anyway, back to this supposedly "softening of the violent rhetoric" Trump speech somebody is writing for him.
It will prove to be just another of the tens of thousands of lies Trump has told just since 2015 unless the very first words out of Trump's piehole are something like:
"To President Joe Biden and the American people, I offer you my heartfelt apology and ask your forgiveness for my 3 1/2 years of lying about Joe Biden stealing the 2020 election. He did not. He won fair and square. I lied to you about that, encited a violent mob attack on cops, the USA Constitution, waged War Against America on American Soil, sat and did nothing but enjoy the show for 3+ hours while my VP, the Speaker of the House and other duly-elected officials were stalked and targeted for assassination, wrongly and dangerously praised, honored and glorified those bloody would-be assassins as "patriots", promised them pardons and further defined my War Against America on American Soil by mischaracterizing them as "hostages" after they were fairly tried, convicted and sent to prison for their and my unforgivable crimes against America and American democracy.
And for that I am very, very sorry. Please forgive me. ".
If we don't hear that coming out of Trump's piehole before the end of this RNC Lie Fest, then he has no intention of making America or American politics safer for the true American Patriots he targeted with violence for every hour of every day of the past 3 1/2 years that he repeated that Big Lie and praised his murderous would-be assassin Repub thugs.
-
1 photos
Harkens Back to Teddy Roosevelt
The Photos and video from Saturday are some of the most iconic in US political history--Of course Roosevelt was not set-up by the CIA and the Secret Service.
Attempted assassination of Theodore Roosevelt.
On October 14,1912, former saloonkeeper John Schrank (1876–1943) attempted to assassinate former USA President Theodore Roosevelt while he was campaigning for the presidency in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Schrank's bullet lodged in Roosevelt's chest after penetrating Roosevelt's steel eyeglass case and passing through a 50 page thick (single-folded) copy of his speech titled "Progressive Cause Greater Than Any Individual", which he was carrying in his jacket pocket. Schrank was immediately disarmed and captured; he might have been lynched had Roosevelt not shouted for Schrank to remain unharmed. Roosevelt assured the crowd he was all right, then ordered police to take charge of Schrank and to make sure no violence was done to him.
As an experienced hunter and anatomist, Roosevelt correctly concluded that since he was not coughing blood, the bullet had not reached his lung; he declined suggestions to go to the hospital immediately. Instead, he delivered his scheduled speech. His opening comments to the gathered crowd were, "Friends, I shall ask you to be as quiet as possible. I don't know whether you fully understand that I have just been shot—but it takes more than that to kill a Bull Moose.
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_assassination_of_Theodore_Roosevelt[/URL]
-
5 photos
At the end of Day One for the RNC Lie Fest
If this keeps up, Elon Musk and Marjorie Taylor Greene, the true King and Queen powers behind the Republican Party, might think about canceling the next couple of days and put Trump back into gag order hiding.
The day finished with Trump behind Biden in the 538 Favored To Win Consensus of Polls by 275 Electoral College Votes for Biden vs 263 for Trump, Biden having 53 Chances of Winning the Election out of 100 vs Trump's 47 in their credible polling mix and Biden 2. 5 points ahead of Trump in the Popular Vote:
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
Oh well. Tomorrow is another day. Maybe Trump or somebody else in the Repub Party will finally say or do something that pulls them out of this up / down range for both Parties' candidates within the mid 40% range.
Nobody is "kicking" anybody's ass yet. I mean, unless you factor in the above Consensus and the rather notable shift toward Biden in the polls among Independents since he was the only candidate in that Presidential Debate Quiz Show who provided truthful, fact-based, substantive answers to every question vs the one who couldn't manage to blather out one.
-
"The least racist", is true to his historical form...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2930420][b]The least racist candidate just chose a white male for his VP [/b]
Apparently, it was not possible for Trump to find a non white male or a woman who would absolutely and without hesitation agree to violate whatever silly Oath of Office he / she took or the USA Constitution and instead follow Trump's criminal orders explicitly at any and all times.
But Vance did.
Everyone kniws that was the #1 requirement to be Trump's running mate in 2024.
But that doesn't prove Trump is a racist. We have his long history of racist moves since the 1970's for that, as you cited and linked above.
It really only further proves he is an America-hating, democracy-hating wannabe authoritarian dictator. Vance used to point that out about him too. But now he keeps his mouth shut about it. ...[/QUOTE]Trump was NEVER going to select a "non-white male" candidate.
But it was fun to see, Vivek Ramaswamy, Tim Scott, Marco Rubio, Byron Donalds, Ben Carson and Elise Stefanik, all as the [I][b]"non-white male"[/b][/I] candidates, twist themselves into pretzels, parroting Trump's nonsense (even when Trump belittled them, made fun of them) and clone themselves as mini-me versions of the pussy-grabber.
Due to his racist and sexist tendencies, naturally Trump was NEVER and COULD NEVER be seen selecting a "non-white male" minority type candidate for Veep. (Look at how well that worked out for McCain!)
How else could he, the Repubs, FOXY Muse and right-wing MSM, justify and keep up, their [B]Project 2025 crusade on DEI hires?[/B] And still denounce, Veep Kamala Harris, as DEI?
After all, how would it look to the right-wing billionaire donor class, conservative elites, white supremacists and the QAnon/MAGA cult woke mob, if they had their very own Repub DEI Veep and deviated from Project 2025 doctrine mid-stream?
-
Character
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2930366]If the assassination attempt is fake news than why are you using an edited photo to make your point? Obviously, the truth means nothing to you. But thanks for the posting. It says everything I need to know about your character.[/QUOTE]Do you really think that I believe it's "fake news"? Again, [B]read what I wrote[/B]. This is not a game. This is not a joke! No, I was mocking the right for the kind of [B]bullshit[/B] it spews when it doesn't like the news. Just dismiss it by calling it "fake news". It can't possibly be true because we don't like it. If you're so narrow-minded and tied up in your own political bent that you couldn't see what I was doing and think I believe this is about some fake news, then that tells me all I need to know about your own character.
-
Love
[QUOTE=Spidy;2930516]Trump was NEVER going to select a "non-white male" candidate. But it was fun to see, Vivek Ramaswamy, Tim Scott, Marco Rubio, Byron Donalds, Ben Carson and Elise Stefanik, all as the [I][b]"non-white male"[/b][/I] candidates, twist themselves into pretzels, parroting Trump's nonsense (even when Trump belittled them, made fun of them) and clone themselves as mini-me versions of the pussy-grabber.[/QUOTE]I just love you massah! [B]Hahahahahaha[/B].
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ingY7ethJOI&ab_channel=Newsweek[/URL]
-
It is a one issue election for me. Crypto. Who supports it? Who does not? Voting my pocket book because both candidates are completely lame in my eyes.
-
Just say no!
JD Vance proposes to bring "cultural heroin" into the White House. He said it:
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2024/07/15/jd-vance-trump-criticism/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2930089]What a historical week! First Biden self-destructs by revealing the true state of his dementia in the debate and then this assassination attempt on President Trump. It is over boys and girls. Trump is going to be the next President. Get used to it.[/QUOTE]It is funny that it took this for half the Democratic douches to say, "Ok, we have gone too far". Without the prosecution of many of the nonviolent J6 protestors, jailing Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, and the endless trials of Trump, we would not have been pointing fingers at Dems and chastising them for their rhetoric, but it finally took this to get through to at least half of them.
Expert after expert has been trotted out and has questioned the SS detail and some have gone so far as to say it is an inside job. After listening to a news report on the head of the SS, that is not even out of the realm of possibility. Was this SS incompetence or a literal conspiracy?
But it is funny that the Dems are on the defensive. Locking up your political opponents, printing ballots with one name on them, and now rejecting that name of Biden has shown everyone what party has truly been anti-Democratic.
Matt Taibbi and veteran reporter Walter Kern had a field day with what the Dem higher ups were contemplating a four round American Idol show where delegates vote for the candidates after they perform. The events would be hosted by Barrack Obama and Bill Clinton and no, I am not making this up. It was actually proposed.
That Trump ran a campaign where he had to beat talented political opponents like Desantis and Nikki Haley is pro-Democracy. He earned the Republican nomination whereas the elites gave it to Biden and now want to take it away because his polling numbers are so bad. Biden is your nominee guys. You are stuck with him. To do otherwise would be undemocratic.
The casino odds went as high as 75% for Trump winning. Biden was like at 16%. Kamala Harris was at 8%, and the field was at 1%. If there ever were worse odds for an incumbent president, I cannot imagine it. Of course, Trump could slip up, but so far, he has run a damned near flawless campaign.
But the left has been praying for a Trump assassination: [URL]https://nypost.com/2024/07/14/us-news/lefties-celebrate-trump-rally-shooting-with-tasteless-posts-on-social-media/[/URL].
And some still are. Cane's post that Trump brought it upon himself was vile. Spidy is only upset because the shooter missed.
But winning is the easy part. The economy is if not in recession damned close to it. And somehow Trump is going to have to deport a huge percentage of the people Biden let in. Then there is negotiating peace in Ukraine and holding Israel to a point where they cannot just go killing anyone they want.
And then we have the domestic bullshit like this DEI crap. Look at this article: [URL]https://www.wired.com/story/right-wing-conspiracy-dei-secret-service-women-blame-trump-shooting/[/URL].
I guess the point of it is to outrage women, but I am so sick of watching movies where women kick the men's ass when we all know that would rarely happen in real life. I don't care what color the skin is of the person but unless you have six foot five intimidating as fuck women who know how to handle firearms right then there should not be women protecting the president. DEI means you do not take the best person for the job, and Trump is going to have to undo this bullshit too.
The clusterfucks that were Biden's debate performance and this shooting is not news to those of us who follow politics but it is to everyone else. To us, it is the ribbon on top of an administration whose only goal was to control a narrative. And when that narrative blew up and was shown to be a lie, they all pointed fingers and ran for cover. Thing is Trump used to talk like a child but he acts like an adult. With this Biden administration, the opposite is true. Right now, they are pushing Biden out to do his speaking and he is constantly putting his foot in his mouth. Yes, we are going to settle our differences at the Battle box. Yeesh.
This administration does not know what the fuck they are doing.
-
Phony Piety Pence vs Astonishing Liar Vance
[QUOTE=TheCane;2930548]JD Vance proposes to bring "cultural heroin" into the White House. He said it:
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2024/07/15/jd-vance-trump-criticism/[/URL][/QUOTE]In 2016, Trump needed more than anything to bamboozle the dumb sucker Repub hillbilly evangelicals in order to squeak out an Electoral College appointment despite losing The Vote my millions and millions.
Hence, Pence.
This time around, he just needs to be surrounded by the most astonishing liars and con men on the planet to tell his dumb sucker cult followers whatever it takes to con them again and even more than before no matter how polar opposite from what they said just a few years ago.
Enter Vance, possibly the most astonishing liar of them all. As impossible as it might be to believe, he is perhaps an even more astonishing liar and con man than Donald J. Trump himself.
-
Unification and Deserts
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2930465]Wasn't Joe supposed to be the unifier president? Anyway, I started the current round of back and forth with a let's cut back on the hate rhetoric. It was nothing that heavy really, just a version of "can't we try to get a long," KKK, but I know that ain't going to happen. So, we locked horns. I said what I wanted to say, you said what you wanted to say, and nothing was achieved, so I am going back to what interests me on the ISG: namely talking about girls, girls & more girls! But make no mistake, I am not conceding the argument. In fact, I think you lost the argument with the 1st sentence in your opening salvo this morning. The Trump deserved it comment was way, way out there and you should know better. I. E. You can't expect to have any kind of civil debate after you throw a hand grenade like that into the discussion two days after an attempted assassination. As Biden always says, "Come on, Man!" How would you have responded to a similar comment if it had been Biden at the wrong end of an assassin's rifle?
P.S. I read and like your posts in the Brazil forum too, so what the fuck! Fighting over politics is total BS. Vote for whomever you like, once, and let the best man, Trump, win.[/QUOTE]You can't unify those like Marjorie Taylor Greene who don't want to be unified. It doesn't matter what you say or do. They aren't interested. So don't try to put it all on Biden. Same with Obama. Right wingers didn't give a shit and wouldn't try to work with him. It takes two to tango. And I also concede nothing, and I did not lose. One of the basic principles of life that I believe in is that one gets back what they put in. Most people I know, regardless of their politics, at least say they believe in that basic principle. Are you saying it isn't true? Trump spewed hate, he caused division, and he incited violence. If that's what you do, then guess what? One day it's going to come right back on you! Some way. Somehow. And to Trump it did. I'm talking about [B]karma[/B]. What goes around comes around. [B]You reap what you sow[/B]! And yes, it's best to be civil, and who can argue about reports traveling all around the world fucking pretty girls up the butt? Wait a minute, wait a minute! Some guys don't like anal! Sigh! I give up!
-
Jack Black Cancels Tenacious Dd Tour, Band's Future in Doubt After Trump Death Wish
This is an interesting diddy and kind of pertinent to the current discussion:
"Frontman Jack Black has canceled what remains of Tenacious Dd's sold-out Australian tour and put the future of the comedy band in doubt after his bandmate said he hoped that whoever tries to murder Donald Trump "next time" doesn't "miss. ".
About 24 hours after an assassin missed blowing the former president's brains out by a centimeter or two, Tenacious Dd took to the stage in Sydney, Australia. During the Sunday performance, co-frontman Black and the crowd sang "Happy Birthday" to guitarist Kyle Gass. Black then asked Gass to make a birthday wish. Gass put the microphone to his face and said, "Don't miss Trump next time. ".
Black, naturally, like all violent-loving Hollywoodists, is a major Joe Biden supporter.
The fallout from the Gass comments was swift and deserved.
On Monday, Australian federal senator Ralph Babet called for Tenacious Dd to be deported. "There is no place in Australia for those who wish for the assassination of others," Babet wrote on Xwitter. " <snip "Anything less than a deportation is an endorsement of the shooting and the attempted assassination of Donald J. Trump. ".
"Anyway, at first Tenacious Dd's next performance was merely postponed. ".
"Frontier Touring regret to advise that Tenacious Dd's concert tonight at Newcastle Entertainment Centre has been postponed," reads a statement from the promoter. "Ticket holders are asked to hold onto their tickets until further information is available. ".
But.
On Tuesday, Black released a social media statement announcing the cancellation of the entire tour and that the creative future of the band was on hold.
"I was blindsided by what was at the show Sunday," wrote Black on Instagram. "I would never condone hate speech or encourage political violence in any form. ".
"Then came the bombshell":
"After much reflection, I no longer feel it is appropriate to continue the Tenacious Dd tour, and all future creative plans are on hold. I am grateful to the fans for their support and understanding. ".
"As a free speech extremist, it is easy to draw the line at. Violence. Gass encouraged violence. Period. He might have couched it as a joke, but he's making it cool, making it okay to wish a man dead a husband, father, grandfather, and former president.
There's a reason why it's illegal to wish for the death of a USA President. It incites and provokes. Yes, comedians and Tenacious Dd is a comedy act deserve the widest berth, and I am on record defending countless left-wing comedians. But again, wishing violence on someone, especially a former president and the current front-runner to be our next president, crosses the free speech line.
Does that mean Tenacious Dd should be blacklisted, should be wished into the cornfield?
No.
Everyone deserves a second chance, including Black, who did the right thing here.
Nevertheless, wishing for murder is encouraging murder, and that's an easy and moral and speech line to draw. ".
-
Flash in the pan...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2930510]If this keeps up, Elon Musk and Marjorie Taylor Greene, the true King and Queen powers behind the Republican Party, might think about canceling the next couple of days and put Trump back into gag order hiding.
The day finished with Trump behind Biden in the 538 Favored To Win Consensus of Polls by 275 Electoral College Votes for Biden vs 263 for Trump, Biden having 53 Chances of Winning the Election out of 100 vs Trump's 47 in their credible polling mix and Biden 2. 5 points ahead of Trump in the Popular Vote:
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
YES, getting shot at while campaigning, as unfortunate as these events are, often do very little or nothing for the presumptive candidate's campaign.
Sure maybe you'll see a 1-point bump in the polls, here or there (as already noted in a previous post), that amounts to nothing more than a quick flash in the pan. To suggest otherwise, as some here would have you believe (that the election is a foregone conclusion), is pure election folly.
Take look at Teddy Roosevelt and George Wallace, who faced similar situations and still LOST. [b]A Trump LOSS,[/b] after an attempted shooting should be no different.
American voters, [b]will not forget[/b], the J6 insurrection, coup, treachery, the violent mob sacking the White House, the overturning of Roe v. Wade, the abortion and IVF bans, the first convicted president with 34-felony counts of fraud and election interference, from a pussy-grabbing presidential disaster that is Trump. No sane American person wants another 4-years, of that "do nothing, no nothing" presidential disaster!
Nobody wants to watch Trump, break his already established, WORST president in US History record! NOBODY!
President Biden, with strong socio-economic records and policies, paired with his strength and excellent standing as an incumbent president (the 14th best ever in history), is what voters will remember at the ballot-box for the WIN!
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2930430]Ross is easily thee most talented writer by light years at the NYT
Ok I know that's a very very low bar but nonetheless.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/15/opinion/donald-trump-assassination-destiny.html[/URL]
"He just turned an attempted assassination into a Renaissance painting of bloodied defiance.".
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2024/07/14/rep-bennie-thompson-field-director-no-longer-employed-after-cheering-trump-shooting/[/URL]
[URL]https://highlandcountypress.com/opinions/secret-service-scuffle-prompts-dei-vetting-scrutiny[/URL]#gsc. Tab=0.[/QUOTE]MDS, your mailbox is full.
-
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2930545]It is a one issue election for me. Crypto. Who supports it? Who does not? Voting my pocket book because both candidates are completely lame in my eyes.[/QUOTE]Trump and JD Vance are pro-crypto. Biden has not made a statement on it, but given how he has beefed up the IRS, my bet is he will do anything to increase government revenues.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;2930534]Do you really think that I believe it's "fake news"? Again, [B]read what I wrote[/B]. This is not a game. This is not a joke! No, I was mocking the right for the kind of [B]bullshit[/B] it spews when it doesn't like the news. Just dismiss it by calling it "fake news". It can't possibly be true because we don't like it.[/QUOTE]This not a good time to bring that fake news shit up. MSNBC and CNN both said Trump fell to the ground at a rally a la Slow Joe Biden instead of reporting he got shot in the ear and ducked for cover. Thing is Twitter did a million times better job of reporting the news than the lame stream media.
Shit, MSNBC even kept that idiot Morning Joe off the air the day after because they were certain he was going to say something stupid. And then you had those racist, sexist pigs at the view saying the shooter was a white male like that had anything to do with anything.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2929870]Yes, a high crime rate is also factored into what makes these typically Repub Trump Red states the worst places to live and work in the USA:
[B]These are America's 10 worst states for quality of life in 2024.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/13/10-states-worst-quality-of-life-america.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
I'll spare you the suspense.
With #1 being the Worst State to Live and Work In:
1. Texas.
2. Indiana.
3. Alabama.
4. Oklahoma.
5. Arkansas.
6. Tennessee.
7. Missouri.
8. Louisiana.
9. Kansas.
10. Arizona.[/QUOTE]I forgot to respond to this because this shit was high comedy. From the article, Some 220,000 educated workers moved there in 2022 alone, according to the Census Bureau. So how could we possibly score Texas at the bottom for Quality of Life?
Oh, I don't know. You just do the same Democratic douche thing and call people stupid I guess.
According to The Commonwealth Fund, Texas leads the nation by far in residents without health insurance, and a staggering 19% of all people with a credit score in Texas have medical debt that has gone to collections.
LOL. And why does that have anything to do with the state? Can you not get insurance if you want it? Translation: Texas spends less time and energy on diverting wealth from one family to another for health care insurance.
Texas is another state with no public accommodation law barring discrimination against non-disabled people; it has passed a barrage of laws targeting the LGBTQ+ community; and its abortion ban is the strictest in the nation.
And how many people moving to Texas care about any of these things? I love the notion that "reproductive rights" is code for pro-abortion. Somebody better tell MSDNC that not 100% of the world thinks getting an easy abortion is a right. Some see that as a plus. And there is another boner:
Also, if any of those new Texas residents lose their jobs, state unemployment benefits cover less than 10% of the average cost of living, according to Oxfam America.
LOL. And here we go again. Texas has an issue because people are not paid when they are not working. Texas has no income tax and because it is a right to work state jobs are plentiful, and that is the reason people come to Texas. There is that and it is a hellluva more affordable than most of the nation.
This is such a fucking stupid article because the reason most people move is because of their job and hopes for a higher quality of life, and people who move to Texas generally say that is the case. Sure, there are issues, but I think the funniest part is the bullshit being pedaled that everything has to be done by law and government. Texans are usually pretty generous and a lot of goodwill and charity is done at the church level, but if you were to read this stupid article, that kind of goodwill does not count.
But people can be pretty generous when you do not tax the shit out of them.
But I agree with this. All the people who read this kind of bullshit should not move to Texas. We do not want you.
-
Fuck Trump / Vance 2024!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2930676]Trump and JD Vance are pro-crypto.[/QUOTE][B]Fuck both of those racist punk ass bitches[/B]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2930676]Biden has not made a statement on it, [/QUOTE]Biden has made a clear statement on it though the actions of his administration during his term.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2930676]but given how he has beefed up the IRS, my bet is he will do anything to increase government revenues.[/QUOTE]It is not about taxes for me it is about a legitimate approach to the regulation of crypto in the USA.
[B]Trump is not pro crypto[/B] he he pro himself and pro votes. He has come around to the idea late. He has endorsed Bitcoin (BTC) not the crypto space in its entirety.
Learn what you are talking about before you go toe to toe with me about crypto. I keep my face in my screens 8 - 10 a day following crypto events.
Although I believe your heart was in the right place. I think both candidates are fucked. They are too old. I hate that the United States of America have come to this when there are so many of my fellow citizens that are capable, between the age of 40 - 60, and would make WAY better Presidents from either party and even independents.
My support is for the candidate that will remove the current SEC chairman who is clearly anti-crypto. The only reason you are seeing any kind of acceptance of crypto in the USA is because Larry Fink changed his mind and decided he could not stand not owning EVERYTHING in the world and decided he was pro bitcoin. What Larry Fink wants, Larry Fink gets!
-
1 photos
Alright then!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2930677]This not a good time to bring that fake news shit up.[/QUOTE]Introducing the all-new My Ear Pillow! Inspired by the man himself for the sympathy vote. Perfect for when you need to muffle the sound of the truth and soak up those delusional dreams in comfort and style. Embrace the madness with My Ear Pillow, because blocking out reality never looked so good!
-
6 photos
At the End of Day Two for the RNC Lie Fest
Oh. Day two shows Trump declining even more vs Biden in the 538 Consensus Poll site's Chances of Winning (53 out of 100 for Biden vs 46 for Trump), the Electoral College Vote projection (277 for Biden vs 261 for Trump) and the Popular Vote (Biden extended his lead in that to 2. 7 points).
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
It appears the RNC candidate, performance and the messaging just isn't working to give them a boost from either the Presidential Debate Quiz Show, Biden's 30 minute no notes interview on ABC, Biden's 1 hour no notes post- NATO Summit press conference, the terrible Repub Shooter's assassination attempt on Repub Donald Trump, Biden's no notes interview with Lester Holt, this ongoing multi-day RNC Lie Fest or all of the above.
Oh well. Tomorrow is another day.
Perhaps that new "less violent rhetoric" RNC speech Trump is busy day and night working on where, no doubt, he will apologize deeply and own up to inciting, encouraging and happily consenting to and supporting violence, attacks and assassinations galore on his political enemies, election workers, judges, juries etc for every day of the past 3 1/2 years that he has been asserting his Big Lie about Biden stealing the 2020 election and his begging Joe Biden and the American people for their forgiveness will do the trick.
-
Repubs Celebration of Martyrdom?
[QUOTE=The Cane;2930534][b]Character[/b]
Do you really think that I believe it's "fake news"? Again, [B]read what I wrote[/B]. This is not a game. This is not a joke! No, I was mocking the right for the kind of [B]bullshit[/B] it spews when it doesn't like the news. Just dismiss it by calling it "fake news". It can't possibly be true because we don't like it. If you're so narrow-minded and tied up in your own political bent that you couldn't see what I was doing and think I believe this is about some fake news, then that tells me all I need to know about your own character.[/QUOTE]
You raise an interesting point, w/r to [i][b]"character"[/b][/i]. I mean, the last several days, have been very disturbing, as to why Repubs are celebrating yet another violent crime, a shooting of one of their own supporters and then bombastically conflating it with some kinda electoral win, really shows what kind of immoral characters the party has become.
As Trump, the House Speaker, and Repubs (at the RNC) try to now use this moment as a rallying cry, to somehow suggest that Trump's shooting is, [i][b]"the moment"[/b][/i] for America to come together, only reeks of desperation and is repugnant to those REAL victims and American families, of gun violence.
So let me get this straight...the Las Vegas shooting [b](60 dead)[/b], Pulse nightclub (FL) shooting [b](49 dead)[/b], Virginia Tech shooting [b](32 dead)[/b], Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting [b](26 dead children)[/b], and none of these brutal mass shootings, are moments for American to come together, but the Trump shooting (1 dead)...[i]is "the moment"???[/i]
The notion or suggestion, that the Trump shooting was, [i]"the moment, for Americans to come together",[/i] is just some fucked-up, sadistic, warped campaign idea of an RNC 'softer side'? PLEASE spare me the sanctimonious bullshit!
While some people here, try to insinuate otherwise, I think, the Dems are happy to see, that Biden's predecessor, will now be able to stand trial for the rest of his crimes. Naturally after losing at the ballot box in Nov 2024.
And let's be real for a moment, shall we? As unfortunate as this was [i](and it has been articulated, [b]"a making of his own, now come home to roost"[/b]),[/i] this is not the first time, America has seen, presidential candidates that have been shot or shot at, while campaigning and have gone on to LOSE the bid for the presidency.
But what was vile, vulgar, appalling and a question of moral character, was how shameful, Elvis 2008 and Repubs here, [b]were truly relishing and celebrating,[/b] Trump being shot at. Reminded me of another disgusting right-wing individual, when it comes to (mass) shootings, in one hateful disinformationist, Alex Jones.
This low-life preys on the death of children and the grief stricken families, for ratings, clicks and money. Calling the Sandy Hook shooting, "fake", what sick individual does that? And yet very little to NO objection from the right. I wonder if Alex Jones, is calling "fake" on this shooting? 'Cause if he did he'd be probably closer to the truth, than all his other phony "fake" outrages combined!
[LIST]BTW, Elvis 2008's celebrating the Trump shooting, also made me think, that perhaps want they really wanted, was [i][b]"martyrdom"?[/b][/i] Think about it, for a sec!
I mean, the celebratory fan-fare, seemed to suggest, what better way to avoid a 2nd embarrassing LOSS to Biden, than to have their [i]"Lord and Savoir",[/i] go out in a blaze of bullets, guts and glory, as the ultimate political [i][b]"martyr"[/b][/i] and sacrifice. Hmmmm...[/LIST]
Celebratory Repubs aside, it's nice to know he'll be able to stand trial. But let's face it folks, nobody wants another 4-years of that lying hot mess, called Trump. NOBODY!
-
Well, we can surmise
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2930688]I forgot to respond to this because this shit was high comedy. From the article, Some 220,000 educated workers moved there in 2022 alone, according to the Census Bureau. So how could we possibly score Texas at the bottom for Quality of Life?
Oh, I don't know. You just do the same Democratic douche thing and call people stupid I guess.
According to The Commonwealth Fund, Texas leads the nation by far in residents without health insurance, and a staggering 19% of all people with a credit score in Texas have medical debt that has gone to collections.
LOL. And why does that have anything to do with the state? Can you not get insurance if you want it? Translation: Texas spends less time and energy on diverting wealth from one family to another for health care insurance.
Texas is another state with no public accommodation law barring discrimination against non-disabled people; it has passed a barrage of laws targeting the LGBTQ+ community; and its abortion ban is the strictest in the nation.
And how many people moving to Texas care about any of these things? I love the notion that "reproductive rights" is code for pro-abortion. Somebody better tell MSDNC that not 100% of the world thinks getting an easy abortion is a right. Some see that as a plus. And there is another boner:
Also, if any of those new Texas residents lose their jobs, state unemployment benefits cover less than 10% of the average cost of living, according to Oxfam America.
LOL. And here we go again. Texas has an issue because people are not paid when they are not working. Texas has no income tax and because it is a right to work state jobs are plentiful, and that is the reason people come to Texas. There is that and it is a hellluva more affordable than most of the nation.
This is such a fucking stupid article because the reason most people move is because of their job and hopes for a higher quality of life, and people who move to Texas generally say that is the case. Sure, there are issues, but I think the funniest part is the bullshit being pedaled that everything has to be done by law and government. Texans are usually pretty generous and a lot of goodwill and charity is done at the church level, but if you were to read this stupid article, that kind of goodwill does not count.
But people can be pretty generous when you do not tax the shit out of them.
But I agree with this. All the people who read this kind of bullshit should not move to Texas. We do not want you.[/QUOTE]Well, perhaps the 220,000 people who could not cut it in other states and had to move to Texas in 2022 alone are a big reason why it is such a miserable place to live and work. You know, "the neighborhood. ".
After all, according to your next point there seems to be a lot of sick deadbeats living there who can't or won't pay their medical bills, maybe can't even get an insurance company to return their calls anymore. Ugh!
The Texans I know are always bellyaching about how intolerably hot it is, cold it is, one disastrous and deadly hurricane or, if they're lucky, tropical storm after another, power outages every time they turn around.
Yet they keep voting for Repubs and whining about Dems. Who the hell would want to live in such a place and among people like that? Damn.
-
3 photos
Oh, there was another update before bedtime
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2930750]Oh. Day two shows Trump declining even more vs Biden in the 538 Consensus Poll site's Chances of Winning (53 out of 100 for Biden vs 46 for Trump), the Electoral College Vote projection (277 for Biden vs 261 for Trump) and the Popular Vote (Biden extended his lead in that to 2. 7 points).
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
It appears the RNC candidate, performance and the messaging just isn't working to give them a boost from either the Presidential Debate Quiz Show, Biden's 30 minute no notes interview on ABC, Biden's 1 hour no notes post- NATO Summit press conference, the terrible Repub Shooter's assassination attempt on Repub Donald Trump, Biden's no notes interview with Lester Holt, this ongoing multi-day RNC Lie Fest or all of the above.
Oh well. Tomorrow is another day.
Perhaps that new "less violent rhetoric" RNC speech Trump is busy day and night working on where, no doubt, he will apologize deeply and own up to inciting, encouraging and happily consenting to and supporting violence, attacks and assassinations galore on his political enemies, election workers, judges, juries etc for every day of the past 3 1/2 years that he has been asserting his Big Lie about Biden stealing the 2020 election and his begging Joe Biden and the American people for their forgiveness will do the trick.[/QUOTE]There has been another update on the above 538 site for tonight.
Biden's Chances of Winning have increased to 54 out of 100 vs Trump's 46 and his Electoral College Vote projection improved to 278 vs 260 for Trump.
Just passing it along to anyone into this whole polls thingy. Which seems to be everyone in the Media, the Repub Party and for sure the Dem Party lately.
-
Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle Must Resign
"The USA Secret Service failed. That Donald Trump is alive today is only a result of sheer luck — a bullet that missed by less than an inch, a head tilt at the right split second. But make no mistake, the fact that an aspiring assassin was able to get to an elevated position within an easy shot of the former president and leading candidate to be the next president is a stunning failure of an agency whose primary mission is to protect the president.
Let us also not forget that in addition to a bullet grazing Trump's ear, there were multiple casualties — Corey Comperatore, a firefighter who died heroically shielding his family from bullets, and two others who were seriously injured.
In the aftermath of the shocking event on Saturday, many questions have been raised about the response. Why didn't the counter-sniper team take out the shooter before he fired a shot? Why didn't they respond more quickly as spectators frantically drew police attention to the suspicious man crawling on the roof? Why did they let Trump continue speaking once this threat was identified? Why didn't they whisk him away sooner in case there was a second assassin?
More on.
SECRET SERVICE.
Secret Service Director Suggests Roof Used by Shooter Was Too Dangerous for Agents to Stand On.
Shocking Trump-Rally Failure Highlights Secret Service Recruiting Issues, Diversity Distractions.
Sheriff Confirms Local Cop Encountered Would-Be Trump Assassin on Rooftop before Shooting.
These are all fair questions, but each one of them can be answered by some variation of explaining a breakdown in communication or imperfect responses in real time. The one question that was most perplexing from the day of the shooting was, how did the Secret Service allow a would-be assassin to get so close to the president, just 150 yards away — a shot that wouldn't be too difficult for anybody with basic training in looking through the scope of a rifle and pulling a trigger? Why wasn't somebody posted on the roof when that could have been arranged in advance?
At first, some of the explanations that came out were that the Secret Service had outsourced to local police the responsibility for securing the locations outside the gates where the crowd was let in — in other words, the area outside the heavily secured area. And there were questions about whether a lack of resources was the issue and the team was spread too thin to post somebody on the roof.
But on Monday, it emerged that in fact multiple law-enforcement officers were inside the building at the time of the shooting. Meaning there wasn't a shortage of personnel — they just were not posted on the roof.
Then, in an interview with ABC News that aired Tuesday, Kimberly Cheatle, the director of the Secret Service, made an extraordinary revelation.
"That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point," Cheatle said. "And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside. "
This makes no sense, on multiple levels. For one, the would-be assassin (a slight-looking 20-year-old with no evidence of any sort of combat training) managed to scale the building and get off multiple shots at Trump. Secondarily, the counter-sniper who ultimately took out the shooter was posted on a sloped roof.
There is simply no excuse for a stunning failure that, but for a stroke of luck or act of God, would have ended up with Trump's death, and all of the political and social turmoil that would have come with it.
Despite this incredible dereliction of duty, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas declared, "I have 100 percent confidence" in Cheatle.
As for Cheatle herself, she tried to act accountable in her ABC interview, claiming, "The buck stops with me. " But if those words are to have any meaning, there is only one move that she can make. Kimberly Cheatle must resign immediately and be replaced by somebody who can do the job competently. ".
-
1 photos
Donald So Loved America.
And Donald So Loved America that he Gave Up a Life of Leisure and was Villified, Attacked and Shot in the Head but by the Grace of God Survived-- so All Americans could Live in a Fair and Just Society.
[URL]https://media1.tenor.co/m/61WONxPxU28AAAAC/donald-trump-assassination-attempt.gif?t=AAYdc34ch1UFCBiLTgaDUQ&c=VjFfZmFjZWJvb2s[/URL]
-
The Rats are Leaving the Sinking Ship
Adam Schiff Calls on Biden to Drop Out: 'I Have Serious Concerns'.
HAHAHA!.
-
1 photos
Calling it Now-- Biden Shall Resign soon
Too Many Dems are Calling for him to leave NOW! -- This article he starts his posturing for a quick exit;.
[URL]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13644485/biden-reason-drop-presidential-race-democrats.html[/URL]
-
Woodman so loved Donald Trump
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2930854]And Donald So Loved America that he Gave Up a Life of Leisure and was Villified, Attacked and Shot in the Head but by the Grace of God Survived-- so All Americans could Live in a Fair and Just Society.
[URL]https://media1.tenor.co/m/61WONxPxU28AAAAC/donald-trump-assassination-attempt.gif?t=AAYdc34ch1UFCBiLTgaDUQ&c=VjFfZmFjZWJvb2s[/URL][/QUOTE]Wood you can pull your nose out of his ass, he already made his choice for Vice-President.
-
Dementia Joe will Croak soon
Scumbag Joe looks worse then ever-- I think if he does not step down he will croak in the next couple weeks Or croak either way- We won't know if it was natural or if the CIA done it.
In any case at least he shall burn in hell-.
-
Careful
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2930903]Too Many Dems are Calling for him to leave NOW! -- This article he starts his posturing for a quick exit;.
[URL]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13644485/biden-reason-drop-presidential-race-democrats.html[/URL][/QUOTE]Be careful what you ask for. Because you just might get it! Harris is polling ahead of Chump!
-
Did God stop whispering already?
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2930963]Scumbag Joe looks worse then ever-- I think if he does not step down he will croak in the next couple weeks Or croak either way- We won't know if it was natural or if the CIA done it.
In any case at least he shall burn in hell-.[/QUOTE]Not to break up this classic Mainstream Media celebration of what a "Lucky Winner" the Repub candidate is vs the "Hapless Loser" Dem candidate is by bringing up something no MSM outlet has dared to even consider for a nanosecond, but:
What if God whispers to Donald Trump that he too shall have Trump's Pandemic Covid again?
That fat old fuck is still fat and old and the last time I heard got hit with his Pandemic's Covid a lot worse and more seriously than it hit Joe.
Perish the thought, of course. And while everyone is so focused on one presidential candidate out there exposing himself to all the new variations of Trump's Pandemic Covid, it seems to me there are 2 presidential candidates out there exposing themselves to it.
Just sayin'.
-
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2930851]"The USA Secret Service failed.[/QUOTE][B]Your entire post is bullshit![/B]
He is not the president. So he does not get protected like one. If you have a problem with that, I suggest that you contact the elected representative of your area. The set the budgets.
Easy for a man of unknown background in the security services to Monday morning quarterback.
-
7 photos
At the End of Day 3 For the RNC Lie Fest
Not much has changed on the 538 Consensus Poll Site since last night except that Michigan has now moved from Toss-Up to Lean Dem / Biden:
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
Otherwise, Biden is still notably ahead of Trump on their Chances of Winning status (53 out of 100 vs 47 for Trump) and with a comfortable lead in the Electoral College Vote projection (276 vs 262 for Trump) and the Popular Vote (2. 5 point lead in that for Biden).
I am so looking forward to Trump's "less violent rhetoric" speech tonight where he apologizes profusely for putting so many cops, election workers and elected officials at deadly risk of attack, maiming, murder and assassination with the constant repetition of his Big Lie about Biden stealing the 2020 election, his near daily praising as "patriots" of the blood-thirsty numbskulls who fell for his horse shit and acted on it, as they did with Trump's Declaration of War Against America waged on American soil on January 6, 2021 and for almost every day of the past 3 1/2 years.
The country really needs to start healing from the historic damage he did to it.
-
Is EihTooms on this Video?
Hey-- EihTooms are you here with your friends? [URL]https://www.youtubetrimmer.com/view/?v=UjxODR9747E&start=1102&end=1297&loop=0[/URL].
Original Video [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjxODR9747E&t=1468s[/URL].
-
I've seen enough!
Biden needs to step down [B]right now[/B]! He's too old to serve another year, let alone four. If he's the candidate, then unbelievably we're going to lose to the worst ex-President in American history! A pundit on TV said it best. Donald Chump over the last three weeks has been the luckiest criminal defendant ever!
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/video/6358420403112[/URL]
-
Trump comments trigger massive sell-off
Way to go, Donny-boy. I see your infamous Midas Touch In Reverse for business and USA Household Wealth is still fully functional even when you are only pissing on the USA Constitution from the campaign trail.
[B]Nasdaq Slides as Chip Stocks Sell Off
Nvidia, TSMC and other semiconductor heavyweights fall.
July 17, 2024
Trump's Taiwan Comments Fuel TSMC Selloff.[/B]
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/stock-market-today-dow-sp500-nasdaq-live-earnings-07-17-2024/card/trump-s-taiwan-comments-fuel-tsmc-stock-selloff-jCO4IsuWjpYQdRD7jKUt[/URL]
And the stock market is definitely not liking all this buzz about a potential 2nd Trump term:
[B]Nasdaq falls for a second day as tech exit continues, Dow loses 400 points.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/17/stock-market-today-live-updates.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]This shift away from tech came to a head on Wednesday, when the Nasdaq tumbled 2.8% in its worst day since December 2022. Wednesday also marked the first session since 2001 where the Nasdaq posted a loss exceeding 2.5%, while the blue-chip Dow registered a gain.
But Thursdays sell-off appeared broader than tech alone. All but one of the 11 sectors that comprise the S&P 500 traded lower, while more than two out of every three Dow members also headed for losses. Even the small-cap focused Russell 2000, which has run up amid expectations for forthcoming interest rate cuts, dropped close to 2%.[/QUOTE]
-
Another Great Update for Biden...
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2930839][b]Oh, there was another update before bedtime [/b]
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
There has been another update on the above 538 site for tonight.
Biden's Chances of Winning have increased to 54 out of 100 vs Trump's 46 and his Electoral College Vote projection improved to 278 vs 260 for Trump.
Just passing it along to anyone into this whole polls thingy. Which seems to be everyone in the Media, the Repub Party and for sure the Dem Party lately.[/QUOTE]
Yet another great update! [b]Please keep them coming!!![/b]
While Repubs, are flexing again in MSM [i](where they do most of "their winning"...kkkk!)[/i], for yet another [i][b]"red wave"[/b][/i], your updates suggest otherwise, with just another [i][b]"pink trickle"[/b][/i] at the ballot-box.
And for those who haven't figured it out yet...elections are WON at the BALLOT-BOX!
[b]FUN FACT: [/b]Repubs, have [b]NEVER[/b] won the popular vote at the ballot-box, in 20 years and [u]ONLY ONCE[/u] in 36 years.
-
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2930851]"The USA Secret Service failed. That Donald Trump is alive today is only a result of sheer luck a bullet that missed by less than an inch, a head tilt at the right split second. But make no mistake, the fact that an aspiring assassin was able to get to an elevated position within an easy shot of the former president and leading candidate to be the next president is a stunning failure of an agency whose primary mission is to protect the president.
Let us also not forget that in addition to a bullet grazing Trump's ear, there were multiple casualties Corey Comperatore, a firefighter who died heroically shielding his family from bullets, and two others who were seriously injured.
In the aftermath of the shocking event on Saturday, many questions have been raised about the response. Why didn't the counter-sniper team take out the shooter before he fired a shot? Why didn't they respond more quickly as spectators frantically drew police attention to the suspicious man crawling on the roof? Why did they let Trump continue speaking once this threat was identified? Why didn't they whisk him away sooner in case there was a second assassin?
More on.
SECRET SERVICE.
Secret Service Director Suggests Roof Used by Shooter Was Too Dangerous for Agents to Stand On.
Shocking Trump-Rally Failure Highlights Secret Service Recruiting Issues, Diversity Distractions.
Sheriff Confirms Local Cop Encountered Would-Be Trump Assassin on Rooftop before Shooting.
These are all fair questions, but each one of them can be answered by some variation of explaining a breakdown in communication or imperfect responses in real time. The one question that was most perplexing from the day of the shooting was, how did the Secret Service allow a would-be assassin to get so close to the president, just 150 yards away a shot that wouldn't be too difficult for anybody with basic training in looking through the scope of a rifle and pulling a trigger? Why wasn't somebody posted on the roof when that could have been arranged in advance?
At first, some of the explanations that came out were that the Secret Service had outsourced to local police the responsibility for securing the locations outside the gates where the crowd was let in in other words, the area outside the heavily secured area. And there were questions about whether a lack of resources was the issue and the team was spread too thin to post somebody on the roof.
But on Monday, it emerged that in fact multiple law-enforcement officers were inside the building at the time of the shooting. Meaning there wasn't a shortage of personnel they just were not posted on the roof.
Then, in an interview with ABC News that aired Tuesday, Kimberly Cheatle, the director of the Secret Service, made an extraordinary revelation.
"That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point," Cheatle said. "And so, you know, there's a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn't want to put somebody up on a sloped roof. And so, you know, the decision was made to secure the building, from inside. "
This makes no sense, on multiple levels. For one, the would-be assassin (a slight-looking 20-year-old with no evidence of any sort of combat training) managed to scale the building and get off multiple shots at Trump. Secondarily, the counter-sniper who ultimately took out the shooter was posted on a sloped roof.
There is simply no excuse for a stunning failure that, but for a stroke of luck or act of God, would have ended up with Trump's death, and all of the political and social turmoil that would have come with it.
Despite this incredible dereliction of duty, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas declared, "I have 100 percent confidence" in Cheatle.
As for Cheatle herself, she tried to act accountable in her ABC interview, claiming, "The buck stops with me. " But if those words are to have any meaning, there is only one move that she can make. Kimberly Cheatle must resign immediately and be replaced by somebody who can do the job competently. ".[/QUOTE]Yeah, it is getting worse and worse. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=439Ub1JFJD4[/URL].
I think these Dems permitted the shittiest SS crew in of all time. Apparently, the A team was guarding Dr. Jill. Can you imagine what would have happened if the shooter got Trump? We would be in a fucking civil war. This is gross negligence, and Biden or whoever the fuck is running things is putting up with this shit. But these Democratic douches are not going to fire anyone because deep down they wanted this to happen.
-
1 photos
Bye-den
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2930963]Scumbag Joe looks worse then ever-- I think if he does not step down he will croak in the next couple weeks Or croak either way- We won't know if it was natural or if the CIA done it.
In any case at least he shall burn in hell-.[/QUOTE]Well -- so now the CIA won't be sprinkling Pixie Death dust on Biden's toothbrush-- But I still think he will croak and go to hell in the next month or so.
-
You dum dums Have Underestimated Trump (David Brooks NYT)
In philosophy there's a problem called theodicy. If God is omnipotent, omniscient and good, why does he allow evil in the world? The toned-down political version of this is simple: If God is omnipotent, omniscient and good, why is he doing everything he can to re-elect Donald Trump?
It's remarkable. First, he inspired President Biden to overstimulate the economy, leading to inflation and discrediting the Biden domestic policy in the eyes of many voters. Then he inspired Democrats to run the televised Jan. 6 hearings, which was a noble civic responsibility but a political distraction. That's not what key swing voters are most concerned about. Then Trump's main primary rival, Ron DeSantis, turned out to be a total stiff. Then prosecutors started indicting Trump, guaranteeing that he would win the Republican nomination. Then there was the avoidance of tragedy in Butler, Pa.
Then there was this week. This is the happiest, most united and most confident Republican convention I've ever been to. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party is imploding. Next week, we'll may very well learn that Trump is going to face Kamala Harris in the general election. The swing states are mostly in the Upper Midwest, and Trump will probably be running against a progressive from San Francisco.
The ways of the Lord are truly mysterious.
Of course human beings may have played a role. At his blog Marginal Revolution, the economist Tyler Cowen lists a number of reasons for the rightward shift in the political climate since 2020. The most crucial, I'the say, are these: The Trumpian right has been more intellectually creative than the progressive left. The Trump message resonates better with today's deeply pessimistic culture. The deindustrialization of America has had decades-long social effects. People don't want to be ruled by the intellectual class, whether under Barack Obama or Biden. What we call woke-ism is really unpopular. The Biden age cover-up damages Democratic credibility and undermines the party's claims of moral superiority (INFERIORITY).
Of course Trump himself may have played a role in his success. Over the past year he has performed acts of showmanship that were remarkably effective, even for him. He turned a mug shot into a propaganda win and an assassination attempt into an iconic image of defiance. But here are a few things that I, at least, did not expect from Trump. He chose two veteran campaign managers in Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita and he's doing what they tell him to do. He's leading a campaign operation that is far more disciplined and professional than his White House was.
He has mostly shut up and lain low as the Democratic campaign falls apart. He has suppressed his bellicose, nasty nature and smiled benignly as his daughter-in-law and granddaughter portray him as a kindly grandpa.
Most important, he has shifted the entire governing philosophy of the Republican Party. His campaign aggressively controlled the platform, moving it in a populist direction. The campaign softened the party's abortion stance, which I would have thought impossible. Trump also made the right vice-presidential pick. Business types like Doug Burgum and Glenn Youngkin would have undercut his populist message while putting people to sleep.
Many of the delegates I have spoken to once cheered lustily for the free-market gospel of Mitt Romney and the aggressive internationalism of John McCain. On Wednesday night they were won over by J. The. Vance, who ripped into both those worldviews. The delegates are still not completely where Trump is. On Monday night, the Teamster boss Sean O'Brien addressed the convention, lashing out at corporate greed. Afterward I was walking down the stairs to exit the arena when I overheard a delegate complaining: "Couldn't he have mentioned small business at least once?" This is still somewhat a business owner's party.
In retrospect the last decade has been a race between rival populisms — the left-wing kind personified by Bernie Sanders and the right-wing kind, personified by Trump and Vance. The right-wing kind has won.
Even for those of us who detest the man, it's kind of impressive. We've learned, probably too late, not to underestimate Trump.
-
Even Repub Brooks knows this is a bad bad omen for America
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2931171]In philosophy there's a problem called theodicy. If God is omnipotent, omniscient and good, [b]why does he allow evil in the world? The toned-down political version of this is simple: If God is omnipotent, omniscient and good, why is he doing everything he can to re-elect Donald Trump?[/b]
It's remarkable.
............
Even for those of us who detest the man, it's kind of impressive. We've learned, [b]probably too late[/b], not to underestimate Trump.[/QUOTE]"probably too late".
LOL. What do you suppose Repub Brooks means by that? What does he think the dire consequences are of underestimating Trump's craftiness in improving his poll numbers until it is now "probably too late" to avert?
I thought Repubs like Brooks were supposed to be relieved that Trump's poll numbers are looking ok. But, no. "probably too late".
Too late to avert what?
I think you will find what he is referring to in his opening paragraph.
And in case you missed that clear and unambiguous message, here is another one from your beloved NYT:
[B]HE IS DANGEROUS IN WORD, DEED AND ACTION.
HE PUTS SELF BEFORE COUNTRY.
HE LOATHES THE LAWS WE LIVE BY.
DONALD TRUMP IS UNFIT TO LEAD[/B]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/07/11/opinion/editorials/donald-trump-2024-unfit.html[/URL]#site-content.
-
Trump's weakness killed that poor Repub rally attendee
That never would have happened if Biden had been there instead of Trump. Because snipers fear and respect Biden but not Trump.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2931141]Yeah, it is getting worse and worse. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=439Ub1JFJD4[/URL].
I think these Dems permitted the shittiest SS crew in of all time. Apparently, the A team was guarding Dr. Jill. Can you imagine what would have happened if the shooter got Trump? We would be in a fucking civil war. This is gross negligence, and Biden or whoever the fuck is running things is putting up with this shit. But these Democratic douches are not going to fire anyone because deep down they wanted this to happen.[/QUOTE]If Trump can't even keep himself and his cult followers safe at a little podunk farm town rally, how can anyone expect him to keep America safe from Iran?
BTW, in Trump's utterly loony, rambling, incoherent, nonsensical, Gish gallop lie fest on steroids, lackluster, tired, feeble, droning, boring Convention speech, he said he could "stop wars with a telephone call".
Why didn't he make that magical telephone call to stop the GW Bush War in Afghanistan for the entire 4 years, all 1460 days, of his miserable presidency?
Why didn't he bother to make that telephone call for 3+ hours to stop the Trump War Against America on American Soil, the NEW War he started as so-called president, being waged on his orders on January 6, 2021?
Did he misplace his phone all that time?
-
5 photos
The 4 Day Repub Lie Fest is Over
Despite Trump getting the typical "convention bounce", which, as is explained in the 538 Consensus Poll site, is generally temporary and partially reflects only who is responding to polls rather than actual electorate voting intentions, Biden has remained ahead of Trump in the Chances of Winning status, the Electoral College Votes projection (enough for Biden to win right now) and the Popular Vote:
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
As usual, the contest is fluid and nobody is "kicking" anyone's ass. The Dem Convention will be interesting.
Meanwhile, the USA Stock Market did not respond well to all the "Rah Rah Trump and the Repubs" anti-business, economy-damaging, anti-America, anti-democracy Repub MAGA Lie Festivities going on this week:
[B]Dow drops more than 100 points, S&P 500 heads for worst week in 3 months[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/18/stock-market-today-live-updates.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
-
Yeah-- Cackles Kamala is Going to Be #47- LMAO
[QUOTE=TheCane;2931017]Be careful what you ask for. Because you just might get it! Harris is polling ahead of Chump![/QUOTE]Let's Go Kamala!! So funny how people posting here are not in reality.
-
Reality?
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2931355]Let's Go Kamala!! So funny how people posting here are not in reality.[/QUOTE]You mean like that "107% of the new jobs are taken by Immigrants"?
Or that "Immigrants are killing hundreds of thousands of our citizens"? (That would mean Immigrants have committed every homicide in America for the past 9-10 years).
Or that "We had the greatest economy of all time, the greatest in the world before the China virus! Now we are in the worst economy! Biden is worse than the ten Worst President's in history"? (Aside from all known data proving Trump's 3 pre Trump's Pandemic years were below average compared with the 11 most recent presidents' economies and much, much worse than that considering he racked up record high deficits just to achieve "below average" numbers and Biden's economy outshines his and every other Repub in history, considering Trump is himself The Worst President in History, it is as mathematically impossible in reality for Biden to be worse than any group that includes Trump in it as it is to take "107%" of anything.).
And, oh, so much more.
-
As MSM barely mentions Trump's outrageous lies at the Convention
And as I have not heard any meaningful push back in Mainstream Media on the blissfully easy to debunk outrageous lies about the economy under Trump vs Biden, we just hear them saying "Oh, that was the usual Trump rally speech. Nothing to see hear. Nothing to say about it. His base loved it", the great professor Allan Lichtman has finally come to the conclusion about typically pro Repub Mainstream Media's "Bothsiderism" serving no other purpose but to help disaster-prone Repubs win elections that I fully understood and have been observing at least since 1982:
[URL]https://youtu.be/S-hZeRQxA0g?si=3f_3OxdQLhAwLTVH[/URL]
-
The Level of Bias in this post is Hysterical.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2931094]Not much has changed on the 538 Consensus Poll Site since last night except that Michigan has now moved from Toss-Up to Lean Dem / Biden:
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
Otherwise, Biden is still notably ahead of Trump on their Chances of Winning status (53 out of 100 vs 47 for Trump) and with a comfortable lead in the Electoral College Vote projection (276 vs 262 for Trump) and the Popular Vote (2. 5 point lead in that for Biden).
I am so looking forward to Trump's "less violent rhetoric" speech tonight where he apologizes profusely for putting so many cops, election workers and elected officials at deadly risk of attack, maiming, murder and assassination with the constant repetition of his Big Lie about Biden stealing the 2020 election, his near daily praising as "patriots" of the blood-thirsty numbskulls who fell for his horse shit and acted on it, as they did with Trump's Declaration of War Against America waged on American soil on January 6, 2021 and for almost every day of the past 3 1/2 years.
The country really needs to start healing from the historic damage he did to it.[/QUOTE]You really thought Trump would or should apologize LOL? Its one thing to support a Democratic candidate and agenda and I understand that. As long as Biden has a pulse, there will be people around him to run the country. I get that. But after Trump is shot, to think that he would or should apologize for him being shot at the RNC is the dumbest and one of the most inflammatory things I have ever read. To still be posting lies like "Trump declared War against America" on Jan. 6, after he has been shot, is foul, despicable, and wreaks of desperation. It is despicable to lie like that after his attempted assassination. People who lie like that and think it is ok to publicly state things like that on an open forum are without morals or any code of honor. In my eyes, they are not human, but something less and I am saddened my nation produced such individuals. I am saddened we live in a society where an adult has become so twisted, he could write such non-sense after the attempted assassination of a Presidential candidate.
I pray for you as an American that you develop some sense of right and wrong which transcends your politics.
-
Apologize for being shot?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;2931500]You really thought Trump would or should apologize LOL? Its one thing to support a Democratic candidate and agenda and I understand that. As long as Biden has a pulse, there will be people around him to run the country. I get that. But after Trump is shot, to think that he would or should apologize for him being shot at the RNC is the dumbest and one of the most inflammatory things I have ever read. To still be posting lies like "Trump declared War against America" on Jan. 6, after he has been shot, is foul, despicable, and wreaks of desperation. It is despicable to lie like that after his attempted assassination. People who lie like that and think it is ok to publicly state things like that on an open forum are without morals or any code of honor. In my eyes, they are not human, but something less and I am saddened my nation produced such individuals. I am saddened we live in a society where an adult has become so twisted, he could write such non-sense after the attempted assassination of a Presidential candidate.
I pray for you as an American that you develop some sense of right and wrong which transcends your politics.[/QUOTE]You saw something in my post that, to you, had me expecting Trump to apologize "for being shot"? Please quote the exact passage where you thought I said that.
Uh. No. I said that IF he really meant the now known to be total bullshit he tried to peddle that his RNC speech was being rewritten to be "less violent" in rhetoric, then he should apologize to Joe Biden and the rest of the American people for inciting the assassination of, oh, his VP Mike Pence, Nancy Pelosi, MittWitt Romney, several other elected officials as well as deadly threats to several election workers, judges, juries, etc by way of his BIG LIE that Biden stole the 2020 election from him. A BIG LIE that he has not only repeated almost daily for the past 3 1/2 years but repeated AGAIN in his rambling, nonsensical, lie-filled, Loony rant at the RNC.
Oh, and to apologize for praising and glorifying the blood-thirsty wannabe assassins as "patriots" and "hostages" in his War Against America on American Soil that he declared and sent to battle on Capitol Hill.
I said nothing about him apologizing for getting shot at himself.
But, of course, it would have been a bonus pro American gesture on his part if Trump had also apologized for defunding and removing the Early Warning / Pandemic Prevention teams from those Chinese labs in 2018 and 2019 contrary to expert warnings for him not to do something so dangerous and stupid and thereby leaving America and the rest of the world bare-ass naked to Preventing his Pandemic from developing in the first place. I mean, considering that Trump economic and national security decision led directly to the deaths of a Million Americans, millions more people around the world, massive global economic destruction and virtually every digit of inflation that followed.
But his apologizing for his "violent rhetoric" in LYING about the 2020 election being stolen from him for several years was the most I was hoping for with his supposedly "softened" speech to bring "unity" to America at the RNC.
None of which happened. Maybe there was a glitch with the teleprompter.
-
Baghdad Bob's Greatest Hit
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;2931500] The Level of Bias in this post is Hysterical [/QUOTE]Ram, this is only the latest example of balderdash from our learned left wing propagandist. But talking about hysterical, here is a video of his mentor's greatest hit. I am sure you will remember this clip. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ung95ORVUY[/URL].
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2931310]Despite Trump getting the typical "convention bounce", which, as is explained in the 538 Consensus Poll site, is generally temporary and partially reflects only who is responding to polls rather than actual electorate voting intentions, Biden has remained ahead of Trump in the Chances of Winning status, the Electoral College Votes projection (enough for Biden to win right now) and the Popular Vote:
As usual, the contest is fluid and nobody is "kicking" anyone's ass. The Dem Convention will be interesting.[/QUOTE]Loony Tooms, do you have some business where you are afraid you lose money if Republicans win? Is there at least some rationale as to why you are this crazy? Why do you have to post this mental masturbation versus anything factual?
In your fucked up world, how is it that you only attribute the fact that Trump is kicking Biden's ass to me? How does it not register with you when I show you the objective casino odds? Do you not believe those numbers are right? How do you blow off all the Democrats calling for Biden withdrawing and are left with me?
In fact, this was the results from your link, Trump wins 51 times out of 100 in our simulations of the 2024 presidential election. Biden wins 48 times out of 100.
Now the casino odds have varied but no one is giving Biden 48% odds. They have been in the 8 to 20% range since the debate. I said that 67% odds of Trump winning were about right. That does not mean Biden has 33% odds of winning though. I think Biden is more out than in. At this point, I think he is negotiating a golden parachute in the hundreds of millions if not billions to quit. If Trump now is at 67% and Biden is at 10%, the last 23% goes to the field.
The Democratic donors seem to be dominating things right now and are clueless as to the American Idol / Survivor show they are going to put on to pick a candidate. If at any time the whole notion of just Biden on the primary ballot was nauseating to the average voter, this show will be. The message sent to the Democratic voter is you are too stupid to know who is best. We tell you and you will vote accordingly. That message is going to IMO going to be more of a negative than any positive any candidate could bring, and a number of Democrats will sit at home.
I said 67% was right with Trump due to the unknowns. Trump could have a scandal or health issue. In fact, assassination is one of the things that was predicted and almost came true. So things can change, and it is the unknown that puts a Trump victory in the 60 to 70% range, but if the election was fair and was Trump v. Biden tomorrow, I think the odds should be 99% to Trump.
And if you look at the CNN projections, Trump wins even without Arizona, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB4vgAClHEk[/URL], you can start that clip at the 2 minute mark.
So hell yeah, Trump is kicking Biden's ass and it is getting worse by the day. Why do you think all the Democrats are freaking out? I just cannot even imagine what kind of bullshit lie you are telling yourself at this point.
-
What the Trump campaign always lacked
Was the emotional. Trump was always the rational choice. Oh, Trump can inspire, but be honest, has there been anytime you have felt warmth with Trump? I remember when Rush Limbaugh said GW Bush won when he went on the Oprah Winfrey show and cried about this twins. He connected with women, and that has been an issue with Trump. He has not connected emotionally well with women.
Well, credit the Trump women for this one. I did not see this speech and wish I had. Here is Trump's seventeen year old Grand daughter Kai giving a speech that is emotional gold. After I saw this, I was like Trump has this thing won.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB4vgAClHEk[/URL]
The speech starts at the 2:05 mark.
-
LOL. Is that a trick question?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2931661]Loony Tooms, do you have some business where you are afraid you lose money if Republicans win? Is there at least some rationale as to why you are this crazy? Why do you have to post this mental masturbation versus anything factual?
In your fucked up world, how is it that you only attribute the fact that Trump is kicking Biden's ass to me? How does it not register with you when I show you the objective casino odds? Do you not believe those numbers are right? How do you blow off all the Democrats calling for Biden withdrawing and are left with me?
In fact, this was the results from your link, Trump wins 51 times out of 100 in our simulations of the 2024 presidential election. Biden wins 48 times out of 100.
Now the casino odds have varied but no one is giving Biden 48% odds. They have been in the 8 to 20% range since the debate. I said that 67% odds of Trump winning were about right. That does not mean Biden has 33% odds of winning though. I think Biden is more out than in. At this point, I think he is negotiating a golden parachute in the hundreds of millions if not billions to quit. If Trump now is at 67% and Biden is at 10%, the last 23% goes to the field.
The Democratic donors seem to be dominating things right now and are clueless as to the American Idol / Survivor show they are going to put on to pick a candidate. If at any time the whole notion of just Biden on the primary ballot was nauseating to the average voter, this show will be. The message sent to the Democratic voter is you are too stupid to know who is best. We tell you and you will vote accordingly. That message is going to IMO going to be more of a negative than any positive any candidate could bring, and a number of Democrats will sit at home.
I said 67% was right with Trump due to the unknowns. Trump could have a scandal or health issue. In fact, assassination is one of the things that was predicted and almost came true. So things can change, and it is the unknown that puts a Trump victory in the 60 to 70% range, but if the election was fair and was Trump v. Biden tomorrow, I think the odds should be 99% to Trump.
And if you look at the CNN projections, Trump wins even without Arizona, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB4vgAClHEk[/URL], you can start that clip at the 2 minute mark.
So hell yeah, Trump is kicking Biden's ass and it is getting worse by the day. Why do you think all the Democrats are freaking out? I just cannot even imagine what kind of bullshit lie you are telling yourself at this point.[/QUOTE]Yes, the business I have that risks exactly what you cited is called "America".
That is why I vote only for the Party whose policies and stewardship have produced every historic economic recovery, expansion, jobs creation and stock market gains of the past 100 years, including this current one under Biden, and none of the historic Great Depressions, Great Recessions, Massive Jobs Destruction and Stock Market Crashes.
That would be the Democratic Party.
And that is why I never vote for the Party whose policies and stewardship has produced every Great Depression, Great Recession, Massive Jobs Destruction and Stock Market Crash of the past 100 years, including the most recent ones under Trump, and none of the historic Economic Recoveries, Expansions, Jobs Creation and Stock Market Gains.
That would be the Republican Party.
Indeed, I am fiercely partisan in favor of historic economic gains for America vs historic "Once in 100 Years Disasters", Great Depressions and Great Recessions that, no wild coincidence whatsoever, have only happened under Repub so-called presidents and never under Dem presidents.
-
Trump's greatest moments vs Biden's worst moments.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2931661]Loony Tooms, do you have some business where you are afraid you lose money if Republicans win? Is there at least some rationale as to why you are this crazy? Why do you have to post this mental masturbation versus anything factual?
In your fucked up world, how is it that you only attribute the fact that Trump is kicking Biden's ass to me? How does it not register with you when I show you the objective casino odds? Do you not believe those numbers are right? How do you blow off all the Democrats calling for Biden withdrawing and are left with me?
In fact, this was the results from your link, Trump wins 51 times out of 100 in our simulations of the 2024 presidential election. Biden wins 48 times out of 100.
Now the casino odds have varied but no one is giving Biden 48% odds. They have been in the 8 to 20% range since the debate. I said that 67% odds of Trump winning were about right. That does not mean Biden has 33% odds of winning though. I think Biden is more out than in. At this point, I think he is negotiating a golden parachute in the hundreds of millions if not billions to quit. If Trump now is at 67% and Biden is at 10%, the last 23% goes to the field.
The Democratic donors seem to be dominating things right now and are clueless as to the American Idol / Survivor show they are going to put on to pick a candidate. If at any time the whole notion of just Biden on the primary ballot was nauseating to the average voter, this show will be. The message sent to the Democratic voter is you are too stupid to know who is best. We tell you and you will vote accordingly. That message is going to IMO going to be more of a negative than any positive any candidate could bring, and a number of Democrats will sit at home.
I said 67% was right with Trump due to the unknowns. Trump could have a scandal or health issue. In fact, assassination is one of the things that was predicted and almost came true. So things can change, and it is the unknown that puts a Trump victory in the 60 to 70% range, but if the election was fair and was Trump v. Biden tomorrow, I think the odds should be 99% to Trump.
And if you look at the CNN projections, Trump wins even without Arizona, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB4vgAClHEk[/URL], you can start that clip at the 2 minute mark.
So hell yeah, Trump is kicking Biden's ass and it is getting worse by the day. Why do you think all the Democrats are freaking out? I just cannot even imagine what kind of bullshit lie you are telling yourself at this point.[/QUOTE]"In fact, this was the results from your link, Trump wins 51 times out of 100 in our simulations of the 2024 presidential election. Biden wins 48 times out of 100. ".
Yes, that is the "convention bounce" I mentioned. Biden was ahead of Trump by a wider gap than that just 2-3 days ago and still ahead of him yesterday when I submitted that link to post.
As I also said, it is a very fluid contest and within a normal +/-MoE even as Trump is enjoying his greatest moments vs Biden's worst moments.
That is why nobody is kicking anybody's ass in this no matter what the casino bets are lately. LOL.
You're impressed that at the highest, most potentially positive point in Trump's run he is only 2-3 points ahead of Biden (on a Convention Bounce) while Biden is experiencing his lowest point in the run AND out of commission due to Trump's Pandemic virus Covid?
Uh. Ok.
-
1 photos
Goldberg Smears Trump's Teenage Granddaughter
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2931664]Was the emotional. Trump was always the rational choice. Oh, Trump can inspire, but be honest, has there been anytime you have felt warmth with Trump? I remember when Rush Limbaugh said GW Bush won when he went on the Oprah Winfrey show and cried about this twins. He connected with women, and that has been an issue with Trump. He has not connected emotionally well with women.
Well, credit the Trump women for this one. I did not see this speech and wish I had. Here is Trump's seventeen year old Grand daughter Kai giving a speech that is emotional gold. After I saw this, I was like Trump has this thing won.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oB4vgAClHEk[/URL]
[/QUOTE]Elvis, you make a good point. I missed most of the granddaughter's speech, but what I saw was a very attractive young girl showing her love and affection to her famous grandfather. What is wrong with that? Well, apparently there was something wrong it because it scares the bejeebies out of the left-wing fanatics. Here is one infamous headline: "Whoopi Goldberg Smears Trump's Teenage Granddaughter as a Prop Used to 'Humanize' Him: 'Don't Fall for It'. ".
So why are the woke fascists on the View such intolerant a-holes? I can't say for sure, but I assume it has something to do with holding on to power and receiving the big salaries Disney pays their professional haters.
-
"Trump's craftiness" or just more J6 hi-jinx?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2931198]"probably too late".
LOL. What do you suppose Repub Brooks means by that? What does he think the [b]dire consequences are of underestimating [u]Trump's craftiness[/u][/b] in improving his poll numbers until it is now "probably too late" to avert?
I thought Repubs like Brooks were supposed to be relieved that Trump's poll numbers are looking ok. But, no. "probably too late".
Too late to avert what?
I think you will find what he is referring to in his opening paragraph.
And in case you missed that clear and unambiguous message, here is another one from your beloved NYT:
[B]HE IS DANGEROUS IN WORD, DEED AND ACTION.
HE PUTS SELF BEFORE COUNTRY.
HE LOATHES THE LAWS WE LIVE BY.
DONALD TRUMP IS UNFIT TO LEAD[/B]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/07/11/opinion/editorials/donald-trump-2024-unfit.html[/URL]#site-content.[/QUOTE]
Would that be the same [i][b]"Trump craftiness",[/b][/i] we saw on display in the staged J6 coup and insurrection? If so, I will say, it crossed my mind, but never thought he'd play that political "trump wild card".
Again, if this [i][b]"devil's work"[/b][/i] OR "Trump's craftiness", (according to this NYT writer), is involved, in the same vein of the staged J6 coup, then IMHO, w/r to "Trump's craftiness", I will say, [i][b]"...Nicely played Trump, nicely played...Indeed!"[/b][/i] (...kkkk!)
Although, might the investigation unearth this [i]"craftiness"[/i]? Or Trump SS Loyalists?
-
Biden Is Out!
Here is the headline from the Wall Street Journal: "Biden Is Dropping Out of Presidential Race. The President ends his campaign for second term amid Democratic concerns over his age and abilities".
I predicted it, but I still can hardly believe it. We live in the most extraordinary times. You can't make this stuff up. I don't know about you guys, but I am looking forward to Chicago. I still remember '68. Who can ever forget it?
-
Now we will see
Now we will see if, as Dems insisted, somebody else telling the truth about America-hating Trump will suddenly mean more coming from another voice:
[URL]https://x.com/joebiden/status/1815080881981190320/photo/1[/URL]
-
6 photos
Just to finish the series
This was the status on the 538 Consensus Poll site's projections right up to roughly 1 hour before Biden pulled out of the race.
Trump's "Convention Bounce" had him sitting at 2 points above Biden on the Chances of Winning (51 out of 100 vs 49 for Biden), 271 Electoral College Votes vs 267 for Biden and with Biden 2 points ahead of Trump in the Popular Vote (see screenshots below):
[URL]https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/[/URL]
-
Is the WOMEN'S vote the Repub's Achilles' heel?
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2931808][B]My Vice President is Black and my next President too![/B][/QUOTE]You might be right!
Well, apart from President Joe Biden, taking down Trump, women seem to be the only other opposition that have been able to break "crafty" Trump!
And with nobody saying anything on [b]ABORTION[/b] (the elephant in the room) at the RNC, and Trump was literally "mum's the word" on the subject, because naturally he was too busy talking about himself, perhaps Veep K.H., will be that friendly reminder, why I think, the women's vote and women, may yet again take down Trump.
[b]PS:[/b] Well I'll miss Joe Biden and the Trump beatdown he'd have given. But a beatdown, from Veep K.H., will be twice as rewarding, coming from a woman, if she's the nominee.
Thanks Again Joe!
-
Great Kamala Commercial
Wow the Trump campaign wasn't just anticipating Kamala — they were fully prepared to respond.
So True! [URL]https://x.com/i/status/1815105740643987512[/URL].
-
Too old?
Who's too old to be President now? Hmm? Who's too old? Donald Trump's crusty, dusty ass is the one who's too old to be President now! [B]Aaaahahaha[/B]! There will be no repeat of 1968. The Dems will get behind one candidate and whup your MAGA maggot asses! The money is already flowing back in like a tsunami! Yeah!
-
President Harris
[QUOTE=Spidy;2931832]You might be right!
Well, apart from President Joe Biden, taking down Trump, women seem to be the only other opposition that have been able to break "crafty" Trump!
And with nobody saying anything on [b]ABORTION[/b] (the elephant in the room) at the RNC, and Trump was literally "mum's the word" on the subject, because naturally he was too busy talking about himself, perhaps Veep K.H., will be that friendly reminder, why I think, the women's vote and women, may yet again take down Trump.[/QUOTE]I hope Biden is planning to resign and make Harris the President but only waiting long enough for her to vet and choose a VP. Then she can run as a true incumbent.
-
Dementia Joe Needs to Step Down NOW!!
How can we let a BrainDead Scumbag Remain in as the President?? There Needs to be hearings on how the Biden admin Covered up Brain dead Joe's condition for 4+ Years!!
-
Orange is the New Black
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;2931808][B]My Vice President is Black and my next President too![/B][/QUOTE]Trump more ganster than Harris and Obama combined. Harris also 50% Indian.
Multiple baby mamas and shameless affairs.
Loud mouth braggadocious behavior combined with extravagant style.
Multiple felony arrests.
Declared bankruptcy.
Hush money scandal.
Pussy grabber.
Steel eyed mugshot.
Shot in the face.
Doesn't pay taxes.
Loves guns.
LOL I Joke, don't take offense.
-
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2931756]Here is one infamous headline: "Whoopi Goldberg Smears Trump's Teenage Granddaughter as a Prop Used to 'Humanize' Him: 'Don't Fall for It'. ".
So why are the woke fascists on the View such intolerant a-holes? I can't say for sure, but I assume it has something to do with holding on to power and receiving the big salaries Disney pays their professional haters.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I was like Fall for what Whoopi? This does not fit your image of him as an inhuman asshole so ignore it? Sorry, this is someone expressing who Trump is in a way he has trouble expressing himself. He puts himself up as a larger than life character, and this granddaughter made himself seem vulnerable, caring, and human.
And that is the thing people do not see about him. Beneath all the bluster, the guy has a good heart. He does want people to be the best they can be. Don't buy it? Sorry, but I do and always have.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;2931807]Now we will see if, as Dems insisted, somebody else telling the truth about America-hating Trump will suddenly mean more coming from another voice:
[URL]https://x.com/joebiden/status/1815080881981190320/photo/1[/URL][/QUOTE]And here we go with the never mind Democrats. Tooms, I thought Biden was kicking Trump's ass in your polls. Why the switch?
It is amazing how Biden got so old after just one debate. It is amazing there were no clues before then. / sarc.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2931832]You might be right!
Well, apart from President Joe Biden, taking down Trump, women seem to be the only other opposition that have been able to break "crafty" Trump!
And with nobody saying anything on (the elephant in the room) at the RNC, and Trump was literally "mum's the word" on the subject, because naturally he was too busy talking about himself, perhaps Veep K.H., will be that friendly reminder, why I think, the women's vote and women, may yet again take down Trump.[/QUOTE]Yes, by all means, let us not forget about the thousands of women Kamala jailed for smoking pot while admitting to smoking it herself. In fact, she was so inspiring to women, she got less than 1% of the Democratic vote in primaries and not one delegate. I do not think she is a shoo in to win the nomination. While the Clintons endorse her, the Obamas do not. All she does well is suck dick and kiss ass. I never thought of Obama as a DEI candidate, but that is all Kamala has going for her.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2931832]Well I'll miss Joe Biden and the Trump beatdown he'd have given.[/QUOTE]Yeah, nothing says beatdown more than quitting. Biden is a putz. I hope we learn how much he got paid off to step down. Hell, Elon Musk tweeted he was told to the minute when Biden was going to step down. Biden was a fucking parasite. That he is all he ever was and all he ever would be.
-
Nominating Kamala would be a mistake.
[QUOTE=Spidy;2931832]You might be right!
Well, apart from President Joe Biden, taking down Trump, women seem to be the only other opposition that have been able to break "crafty" Trump!
And with nobody saying anything on [b]ABORTION[/b] (the elephant in the room) at the RNC, and Trump was literally "mum's the word" on the subject, because naturally he was too busy talking about himself, perhaps Veep K.H., will be that friendly reminder, why I think, the women's vote and women, may yet again take down Trump.
[b]PS:[/b] Well I'll miss Joe Biden and the Trump beatdown he'd have given. But a beatdown, from Veep K.H., will be twice as rewarding, coming from a woman, if she's the nominee.
Thanks Again Joe![/QUOTE]Who are going to vote for Kamala?
1. Democrats.
2. Left-leaning independents.
3. Other independents and maybe 1% of Republicans who realize what a disaster the second Trump's coming could become.
Who won't vote for Kamala?
1. 99% of Republicans.
2. Centrists and right-leaning independents who might not like Trump, but who're looking for a charisma in their candidate -- Kamala has none.
I'm afraid the Electoral College system might favor the second group. It would be like Hillary V. 2.
And of course, there are folks who'll stay home due to the lack of enthusiasm for either candidate.
Someone once said that FDR would've never become president if television was widely available at the time because Americans wouldn't have voted for a man in a wheelchair.
Kamala is like a man in a wheelchair. She's practically invisible, and her voice tends to tremble sometimes when she's nervous. Hillary at least didn't have these predicaments.
-
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2931806]Here is the headline from the Wall Street Journal: "Biden Is Dropping Out of Presidential Race. The President ends his campaign for second term amid Democratic concerns over his age and abilities".
I predicted it, but I still can hardly believe it. We live in the most extraordinary times. You can't make this stuff up. I don't know about you guys, but I am looking forward to Chicago. I still remember '68. Who can ever forget it?[/QUOTE]This will be a game like Survivor or American Idol, and it will be fun to watch. Thing is while it will be entertaining, I am not sure Americans are going to like this way of picking a president. Kamala Harris will be the favorite until she has to talk. She already had a phone call where she hung up on rich donors. Not good.
Newsome has only won in California, and I was shocked to see the skeletons in his closet. I have never seen a candidate like Newsome where someone like Adam Corolla goes out on a limb to bash so strongly. He looks the part, but in his case, his looks are deceiving.
Thing about Hiliary is the more people see her talk, the more hated she is, and she was falling on her face back in 2016. Can you imagine what kind of scrutiny she would get now?
Michelle Obama is not interested, and I think people buy the fantasy that she would be Obama the second when even she admits it would not be.
The dark horse, and a guy not mentioned until recently, is Governor Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania. The way the electoral map is shaping up, the Democrats ABSOLUTELY need PA, and this guy is popular in his home state, and I cannot find any dirt on him. He is Jewish, but that did not stop the love sent to Bernie Sanders by the Bernie bros, and that would mean he would be loved by the Wall Street guys and Hollywood elite.
The only chance a guy like Shapiro has is at an open convention, and he would inject youth and new blood into the Democratic party which it desperately needs. I heard a clip of him speaking, and I was like, "Okay, this guy seems likable and not entirely crazy. " If he comes across like I saw and there are no skeletons in his closet, he could give Trump a run for his money.
On the other hand, if the Dems are dumb enough to pick Kamala, then Trump wins in a mega land slide.
-
Don't get too excited
[QUOTE=AxelHeyst;2931806]Here is the headline from the Wall Street Journal: "Biden Is Dropping Out of Presidential Race. The President ends his campaign for second term amid Democratic concerns over his age and abilities".
I predicted it, but I still can hardly believe it. We live in the most extraordinary times. You can't make this stuff up. I don't know about you guys, but I am looking forward to Chicago. I still remember '68. Who can ever forget it?[/QUOTE]The oligarchs will rig it don't worry a bit Democratic voters in 50 states and now a handful will replace him.
They rigged the 2008 against a 3rd term for Bubba in favor of Barry Hussein.
They rigged the primaries against Bernie in 2016.
They rigged the general election for a 3rd term for Bubba in 2016 and still came up short.
They rigged the Democrat primaries in 2020 again.
They rigged the general election in 2020 for Scumbag Joe.
[URL]https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/[/URL]
They just knifed Scumbag Joe in the back.
Rest assured they have a plan for whom the nominee will be.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;2931832]Well I'll miss Joe Biden and the Trump beatdown he'd have given.[/QUOTE]Yeah, he quit instead. How noble! And why did he quit again if he was going to give Trump such a beat down?
Shit, the only strategy you [blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue] had was this lawfare campaign to distract from the fact that Biden was so old. And now this assassination attempt, while not a conspiracy to shoot Trump, was at this point purposeful negligence. Biden was such a shit candidate that his administration was perfectly happy to see assassins fire away at Trump or RFK Jr. That is how fucked in the head they were.
As for women, soy boy, you do not seem to get that women prefer male leaders over female ones. Yes, studies show that to be true, and here is an example of that in real life [URL]https://twitter.com/Rich_Cooper/status/1815057012222259458[/URL]
If this assassination attempt happened on my watch, and I saw how incompetent the job was done, I quit. The job is way too important and I would admit that I failed. Instead, we got a woman saying, "Well, the roof the assassin was on was titled and someone might have hurt themself. " This crazy * does not get it is the SS agency's job to take a bullet for a president. Then we get her boss saying he had full confidence in her? Uh, why? And then there is this nonsense about her wanting more women in SS. So her agenda is power and not excellence. On the other hand, Trump is fucking shot, and his first instinct is to say fight for the cause. Not his health. The cause.
Men take a more macro view and care that the system is fair. Women are out for themselves. Trump says he would have preferred not to run again, but things were so screwed up he had to. Okay, maybe you do not believe that, but Trump had power and money before becoming president. There is a case to be made he is doing this for his country and for his kids and grandkids.
And with Kamala? LOL. If there is any reason outside of power and money, you need to have your head examined. Kamala has been about Kamala. Always has been and always will be. You are deluding yourself if you think women are not going to see through her bullshit.
In fact, the whole Biden thing reminds me of so many women who are just so upset at how they feel, and they need to make a change and cannot imagine how things could be worse, and they make a change and things get far worse.
You Democratic [blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
-
Its reprehensible
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2931864]The oligarchs will rig it don't worry a bit Democratic voters in 50 states and now a handful will replace him.
They rigged the 2008 against a 3rd term for Bubba in favor of Barry Hussein.
They rigged the primaries against Bernie in 2016.
They rigged the general election for a 3rd term for Bubba in 2016 and still came up short.
They rigged the Democrat primaries in 2020 again.
They rigged the general election in 2020 for Scumbag Joe.
[URL]https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/[/URL]
They just knifed Scumbag Joe in the back.
Rest assured they have a plan for whom the nominee will be.[/QUOTE]And the DNC has the temerity to call Our Lord and Savior a threat to Democracy WOWWWWWW.
[URL]https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20161026-how-liars-create-the-illusion-of-truth[/URL]
[URL]https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/joseph-goebbels-on-the-quot-big-lie-quot[/URL]
This is the M. O. Of the DNC and Bangkok Bob.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/07/19/wall-street-donors-neocons-seethe-over-populist-jd-vance-being-trumps-vp/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/20/business/wall-street-republicans-trump-jd-vance.html[/URL]
Is taking Scumbag Joe out "the last arrow in their quiver" because if this doesn't stop Our Lord and Savior.
Their last option might be to rig it again like 2020, but they then risk Civil War 2. 0.
[URL]https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/[/URL]
-
You lay out facts
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;2931842]Trump more ganster than Harris and Obama combined. Harris also 50% Indian.
Multiple baby mamas and shameless affairs.
Loud mouth braggadocious behavior combined with extravagant style.
Multiple felony arrests.
Declared bankruptcy.
Hush money scandal.
Pussy grabber.
Steel eyed mugshot..[/QUOTE]Why ruin the post by qualifying it as a joke?
-
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;2931842]Trump more ganster than Harris and Obama combined. Harris also 50% Indian.
Multiple baby mamas and shameless affairs.
Loud mouth braggadocious behavior combined with extravagant style.
Multiple felony arrests.
Declared bankruptcy.
Hush money scandal.
Pussy grabber.
Steel eyed mugshot.
Shot in the face.
Doesn't pay taxes.
Loves guns.
LOL I Joke, don't take offense.[/QUOTE]Brother, you have me [B]ROTFLMAO![/B] !with this.
-
Oh, that is so simple
[QUOTE=Woodman09;2931840]How can we let a BrainDead Scumbag Remain in as the President?? There Needs to be hearings on how the Biden admin Covered up Brain dead Joe's condition for 4+ Years!![/QUOTE]Because, despite Biden's stuttering issue and the two brain aneurysms in the late 1980's that now in old age manifests itself with motor skill problems in his speech and on his body and gait, nothing is wrong with his Cognitive Acuity, his ability to fully comprehend what he is hearing, reading and to make presidential decisions accordingly.
There was never any "cover up" in that regard.
And even if totally flat-lined, his being a Dem means he will continue to be a better president with better results than any Repub ever, especially Trump.
I do think he should resign and make Harris president so she can run as a true incumbrnt.
However, a big, big problem with doing that is I believe she will then need at least some Repub votes in Congress to get her VP choice approved. And that means they will obstruct and delay on and on, leaving it to, yep, you guessed it, ChristoFacist Mike to be #1 next in line for the Oval Office. Lolol. Yes, Biden is smart and Cognitively Competent enough to know that about the Repub Party, too.
That issue is avoided if she merely names her VP choice and gets the required 2/3 delegate votes at the convention. Preferably on the first ballot.
-
Oh cmon don't start talking like ISGs Bangkok Bob lolol
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2931853]Yes, by all means, let us not forget about the thousands of women Kamala jailed for smoking pot while admitting to smoking it herself. In fact, she was so inspiring to women, she got less than 1% of the Democratic vote in primaries and not one delegate. I do not think she is a shoo in to win the nomination. While the Clintons endorse her, the Obamas do not. All she does well is suck dick and kiss ass. I never thought of Obama as a DEI candidate, but that is all Kamala has going for her.
Yeah, nothing says beatdown more than quitting. Biden is a putz. I hope we learn how much he got paid off to step down. Hell, Elon Musk tweeted he was told to the minute when Biden was going to step down. Biden was a fucking parasite. That he is all he ever was and all he ever would be.[/QUOTE]I never thought of Obama as a DEI candidate lololol I live in Chicago if Barry wasn't a DEI token nobody is, he was an unemployable "community organizer" in the hood LOL.
He hadn't done anything before the best DEI gig around and true to form hasn't done anything since.
Josh Shapiro? LOL he's in the wrong party with a last name like that, as is Ill Gov Pritzker I wish them both lots of luck because they're going to need it LMAO.
-
Suddenly, a change in message
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2931850]And here we go with the never mind Democrats. Tooms, I thought Biden was kicking Trump's ass in your polls. Why the switch?
It is amazing how Biden got so old after just one debate. It is amazing there were no clues before then. / sarc.[/QUOTE]Only now am I hearing NBC's polling guru Steve Kornacki breaking his silence and ranks with the rest of typically pro Repub Mainstream Media by pointing out that "Gee, after spinning everything "wonderful" for Trump and "terrible" for Biden, the polls have simply not gone sour for Biden. Trump is still only 2 points ahead of Biden at thr national level, 47 to 45, and well within a normal +/-MoE in the battleground states that matter. And, ya' know, it is so early. There was plenty of time for those poll numbers to flip before election. Not that poll numbers matter very much to an election outcome anyway. ".
Of course, this line of messaging only comes now that MSM has terrified Dem donors and voters enough for them to make hysterical calls to their state and local representative, begging them to say something even more terrifying to drag Biden's poll numbers down further. Which wasn't really happening anyway.
Lolol. Typical pro Repub MSM doing what it does best.
-
Rehashing Bernie again?
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2931864]The oligarchs will rig it don't worry a bit Democratic voters in 50 states and now a handful will replace him.
They rigged the 2008 against a 3rd term for Bubba in favor of Barry Hussein.
They rigged the primaries against Bernie in 2016.
They rigged the general election for a 3rd term for Bubba in 2016 and still came up short.
They rigged the Democrat primaries in 2020 again.
They rigged the general election in 2020 for Scumbag Joe.
[URL]https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/[/URL]
They just knifed Scumbag Joe in the back.
Rest assured they have a plan for whom the nominee will be.[/QUOTE]Your beloved Bernie launching a long term primary challenge against Clinton contributed as much to Trump squeaking out an additional 78,000 votes sprinkled among 2-3 battleground states as Repub Comey's October Surprise and Russia's unprecedented collusion with Team Trump to interfere and influence the election.
Consequently, despite Trump being handed much better economic and national security conditions from the out-going Obama-Biden Administration than any incoming Dem administration was ever handed by an out-going Repub Administration (or, for that matter, much better than an out-going Repub Administration ever handed an in-coming REPUB Administraion, as in Coolidge to Hoover and Reagan to Bush1), Repub Trump still managed to produce a Repub MAGA Winger Perfect World of results in just 4 short years:
- Trillions added to the deficit with virtually nothing meaningful to show for it except producing 1 million fewer jobs in those first 3 below average economy years pre Trump's Pandemic than in the previous 3 Obama-Biden years without it.
- But the corporate elite and wealthiest did get wealthier.
-A failed trade war with China that drove the USA Manufacturing and Agriculture industries into a Recession so severe Trump had to issue emergency welfare checks just to keep them afloat.
- Two Bear Market Crashes.
- Laying the necessary groundwork for, embracing, exacerbating and deepening with his botched handling of it and lies, the historic Trump's Pandemic.
- At least a million American deaths, millions more deaths around the world, millions upon millions of jobs wiped out, double-digit unemployment rates, long term business and school closures, global supply-chain collapse, the Inflation, skyrocketing costs for rent, housing, food and gas that followed.
- Keeping America fully and directly involved in boots-on-the-ground combat in the War in Afghanistan for every day of his presidency.
- Declaring and charging into battle enlisted domestic terrorists for his NEW Repub War Against America, on American Soil, on January 6, 2021.
- Inciting his violent mob of "patriots" (his term for them) to atrack and kill cops, assassinate his VP for not joining him in violating his Oath of Office, destroying the Constitution, overturning a free and fair election and overthrowing American democracy and attempting to assassinate other elected officials, including the Speaker of the House.
- At least two giant spikes in the crime rate and border crossings.
- A bonus post-Administration accomplishment for Trump being his order to his Repub lackies in Congress to abandon the toughest bi-partisan Comprehensive Immigration Reform legislation ever produced, apparently simply because he wanted as many potential terrorists, rapists and murderers to continue crossing the border to make him look and feel better.
- A counterproductive sea change for the worse in International travel and mongering due to his creating and mishandling Trump's Pandemic that might continue for decades.
Seriously. Aren't you satisfied with what Bernie Sanders' challenge for the nomination in 2016 produced for your Repub MAGA Winger side?
I don't know, MDS, I'm kinda sensing a lament or regret about those classic Repub results on your part now.
-
Oh here we go!
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2931864]The oligarchs will rig it don't worry a bit Democratic voters in 50 states and now a handful will replace him.
They rigged the 2008 against a 3rd term for Bubba in favor of Barry Hussein.
They rigged the primaries against Bernie in 2016.
They rigged the general election for a 3rd term for Bubba in 2016 and still came up short.
They rigged the Democrat primaries in 2020 again.
They rigged the general election in 2020 for Scumbag Joe.
[URL]https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/[/URL]
They just knifed Scumbag Joe in the back.
Rest assured they have a plan for whom the nominee will be.[/QUOTE]Already coming up with the "rigged" excuse for when you lose! I'll tell you what. When you do lose? Show your sorry asses up at the Capitol again and see what happens. Defenders of American democracy will be waiting to repel your treachery and treason!
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2931864]The oligarchs will rig it don't worry a bit Democratic voters in 50 states and now a handful will replace him.
They rigged the 2008 against a 3rd term for Bubba in favor of Barry Hussein.
They rigged the primaries against Bernie in 2016.
They rigged the general election for a 3rd term for Bubba in 2016 and still came up short.
They rigged the Democrat primaries in 2020 again.
They rigged the general election in 2020 for Scumbag Joe.
[URL]https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/[/URL]
They just knifed Scumbag Joe in the back.
Rest assured they have a plan for whom the nominee will be.[/QUOTE]Yeah sure, Kamala baby IS the chosen heir and most likely candidate, but we shall see how that works out for the Dems. After all she was the DEI VP candidate in 2020. She has lower approval numbers than Biden, she has never won a primary or caucus, and she is lousy on the stump. I am looking forward to watching her defend the Biden / Harris record of failure and mediocrity. Specifically, I am looking forward to her explaining why she has been AWOL on her one VP assignment as the border queen. So, I am also really looking forward to her debates with President Trump.
Her campaign for president is going to be very dirty focusing on 2 issues, a woman's "right" to abortion up to and including the moment immediately preceding birth, and Trump is Hitler, all the while trying to downplay and run away from the top issues that concern most Americans, including woman, namely the economy stupid (inflation: less purchasing power (groceries, gasoline, car insurance, home prices, rental prices) for working people and the decline of real wages), the open border, runaway crime in Democrat controlled cities, 2 wars, DEI, and woke indoctrination in our universities and schools.
Meanwhile there are at least 5,000 Hamas sympathizers and nihilists planning to descend on Chicago and cause a lot of trouble. It may come to nothing, but it might very well turn into a disaster for the Dems like it was in '68. Remember poor Hubert Humphrey. He did not have a chance after the Chicago '68 convention. This is the next political show I am most looking forward to watching. I hope I am not disappointed.