Printable View
[QUOTE=Syzygies;1594875]You Farangs may be happy with the situation / economy. I can assure you the Thais I talk to are not generally happy with it. Everyone in the lower jobs is struggling. Many businesses in the tourist area just could not survive and shut down, Soi 33 of Sukhumvit has been dying. See how many customers they have in Mojos or The Office these days.[/QUOTE]Tourism is 6% of the Thai economy. A drop in the bucket. This is an export based economy.
[QUOTE=Bigatl164;1594382]In US $$ what will it cost for a ST and for a LT for a day? Thinking food, local transportation, etc.[/QUOTE]Apologies. I misunderstood the question. I thought you were trying to compare the cost of such services in Thailand versus equivalent in the USA.
[QUOTE=Syzygies;1594746]This is not the USA. Their is no social security. People are forced to work in some way, eve if its a bar. They have to eat. Comparing to USA official unemployment is meaningless.
You do a survey with country people. Those that used to okay On a rubber plantation now have severe problems. The price of rubber has been wrecked since Yingluck came to power. Just one example. The price of gas for cars was reduced, but price of gas for the poor to cook food went up dramatically.[/QUOTE]I wasn't trying to draw a comparison with the USA. My point was that the Thai economy seems to be in pretty decent shape, at least as far as the overall unemployment numbers go. As with any economy there will be good areas and bad areas. But overall, I'd call anyplace with a sub-1% unemployment rate "booming. ".
In fact, an unemployment rate this small is a real problem. Business can't expand and it's very difficult to start new ones. There is no available labor pool from which to draw. So, I think you'll see labor costs continue to increase, perhaps significantly, over the next few years as businesses compete for available talent.
Today I went to Crazy House looking for Nat No. 5 with the 10 body and big high D- cups. Mamasan says she only showed one day about 2 weeks ago, which must have been the day I barfined her, and not seen since. Mamasan the secret of her growing tits was taking special hormones. Doesn't work for every girl. There were some nice skinny girls.
Decided to go get Aor at Dollhouse, a small slim but sexy cutie Coyote dancer. Dollhouse has a small number of Coyote dancers (wearing very cut off jean shorts). Aor turned out to be No. 35. May No. 25 (new girl) had a great slim body but face under a fringe was not quite right for me once I saw her close up. No. 17 was also very pretty (and slim). Renewed my acquaintance with Chocolat, and also Phraow, a girl with magnificent natural C cups and great lips. Unfortunately Phraow was previously a bomb-out in the room for me due to being "dick scared", or perhaps liking much younger guys, who knows. So Phraow is really hot looking for me, but no use to take her again I guess.
I also saw Bua, Paul K's No. 47. His recently attached pics are of Bua (definitely not Noon ). Much better body than Noon at Suzi Wong, but still rather too strong and thick looking for me. Face okay but not my spec. I clearly like the girls far skinnier than Paul. I like the semi-starved model types (well if they were taller they could be models). I guess Paul likes the girls built for power. Its lucky we all don't go for exactly the same thing.
Back to my girl Aor. Tiny just 150 cm and 40 Kg., very small tits, light coloured skin, comes from Khorat, super tight ass like an apple with very good gap underneath. Very small waist makes a good waist to thigh ratio. Face small and very cute little up turned nose. Turned out to be a non smoker and kissed me nicely on the bed. She responded a little bit to DATY but clearly was a bit shy and embarrassed. Let me finger her pussy, and although tightish I could find no problems. Extended fuck and also doggy was very nice. She knew how to gently massage my balls while fucking her. Exquisite feel for the sex. Will definitely repeat. Even though so small, a better match for me than Chocolat the previous night.
As usual no prices were discussed. She left it up to me. Must be due to being a long term well known customer. I guess the girls gossip and know lots about me before I even take them.
It appears that my previous regular skinny Noi with magnificent ass, has left DH and works 2nd floor Nana Plaza. I will have to ring to find out her new bar.
I can understand now that if Paul says the Crazy House line up was not that good, it might mean too many skinny girls with great gap, just right for me.
[QUOTE=Phordphan;1594986]But overall, I'd call anyplace with a sub-1% unemployment rate "booming. ".
[/QUOTE]I'd call it a country with bad data collection agencies and suspect statistics.
[QUOTE=Syzygies;1594995]I also saw Bua, Paul K's No. 47. His recently attached pics are of Bua (definitely not Noon ). Much better body than Noon at Suzi Wong, but still rather too strong and thick looking for me. Face okay but not my spec. I clearly like the girls far skinnier than Paul. I like the semi-starved model types (well if they were taller they could be models). I guess Paul likes the girls built for power. Its lucky we all don't go for exactly the same thing.[/QUOTE]Thank you for straightening out the confusion I created with my poor notes and even poorer memory. So I was with Noon at SW. The thing is the Bua at Dollhouse was about as stocky, taller, but less busty than the SW girl I was with; and as I mentioned in a previous post, the SW lady had very toned legs like a runner. Though short, in my opinion they were her best feature. She did have a sturdy looking body. The Dollhouse lady had a thicker waist, so between the two ladies, the SW lady had more of an hour glass figure.
As for my taste in women, I have broad tastes, or perhaps I have no taste. ;) Soon I'll submit reports on #50 at Dr BJ's Nuru who is rather tall for a Thai and thin as a rail. No photos but you can see her on the website. By the way she is much thinner in person than she appears there. I'll also report on Kate at Bamboo. I have photos of her, which show how skinny she is. She's also fairly tall for a Thai girl. I was with 2 different ladies at Nataree who were both thin and petite. Again reports are coming. Mujie from Rainbow 1 was also thin and petite. However, I was also with Pinky and others at Cherry Massage. She is very reubenesque. When I'm out looking for a lady, physical appearance is only one attribute I consider. I also consider the girls personality, how well we seem to get along and whether I think there is a good chance the sex will be fun. Sometimes I want more of a PSE in which case I will try to determine if the lady has a wild side. This is why I like to post photos with my reports. Syzygies seems to have a very clear idea of the exact physical qualities he looks for in a woman. He also has very high standards. So when he says he is attracted to a particular woman, I have some sense of at least what the woman's silhouette looks like. I also expect her to be very attractive. In my case, that's not possible. The lady could be tall or short, round or thin, busty or flat, attractive or rather ordinary. I do tend to go for ladies who are happy and smile a lot. But here again, there are exceptions. I guess with me the exceptions are the rules. I've got at least six more reports to file. I better get to work.
[QUOTE=PaulKausch;1595035]As for my taste in women, I have broad tastes, or perhaps I have no taste. ;) Soon I'll submit reports on #50 at Dr BJ's Nuru who is rather tall for a Thai and thin as a rail. No photos but you can see her on the website. By the way she is much thinner in person than she appears there. I'll also report on Kate at Bamboo. I have photos of her, which show how skinny she is. She's also fairly tall for a Thai girl. I was with 2 different ladies at Nataree who were both thin and petite. Again reports are coming. Mujie from Rainbow 1 was also thin and petite. However, I was also with Pinky and others at Cherry Massage. She is very reubenesque. When I'm out looking for a lady, physical appearance is only one attribute I consider. I also consider the girls personality, how well we seem to get along and whether I think there is a good chance the sex will be fun. Sometimes I want more of a PSE in which case I will try to determine if the lady has a wild side. This is why I like to post photos with my reports. Syzygies seems to have a very clear idea of the exact physical qualities he looks for in a woman. He also has very high standards. So when he says he is attracted to a particular woman, I have some sense of at least what the woman's silhouette looks like. I also expect her to be very attractive. In my case, that's not possible. The lady could be tall or short, round or thin, busty or flat, attractive or rather ordinary. I do tend to go for ladies who are happy and smile a lot. But here again, there are exceptions. I guess with me the exceptions are the rules. I've got at least six more reports to file. I better get to work.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the reports and pictures Paul. Sounds like you had a good time. Glad my friend was able to direct you to some nice choices. As far as tastes go, I like them all. So I guess I have no taste either. I've met very few women that I couldn't get worked up over some part of her. Even a bubbly personality sometimes does the trick. I will say one thing: There are few women that look bad with my cock in their mouths.
Friend has invited me to Hua Hin. Was wondering if anyone has been down in that area and what is the availability for mongering. Or is it BYOG? Any help would be appreciated. Please PM if you have information to share. Thanks
[QUOTE=Wolvenvacht;1595023]I'd call it a country with bad data collection agencies and suspect statistics.[/QUOTE]Perhaps. It couldn't be any worse than the book-cooking going on in the USA.
However, based on conversations I've had with friends in the Ex-I'm and software industries, it's damned difficult to find help unless you're willing to pay through the nose. One company I know didn't pay their software development staff a year-end bonus (or maybe it was just very small, I'm not sure). Anyway, the entire team walked. After about a year they still haven't been able to replace any of them.
[QUOTE=Phordphan;1595093]Perhaps. It couldn't be any worse than the book-cooking going on in the USA.
However, based on conversations I've had with friends in the Ex-I'm and software industries, it's damned difficult to find help unless you're willing to pay through the nose. One company I know didn't pay their software development staff a year-end bonus (or maybe it was just very small, I'm not sure). Anyway, the entire team walked. After about a year they still haven't been able to replace any of them.[/QUOTE]Spot on. Finding good employees is tough as they all know another job is right around the corner.
[QUOTE=FruitNinja;1595073]Friend has invited me to Hua Hin. Was wondering if anyone has been down in that area and what is the availability for mongering. Or is it BYOG? Any help would be appreciated. Please PM if you have information to share. Thanks[/QUOTE]Haven't been to Hua Hin in about a year so take this into account. Go down by the Hilton as you walk along the soi in front of the Hilton there a # of sois on your left side. Just pick 1 of these and head down this leads into the bar area. Quite a number of bars and massage shops and a fair amount of action. I like it there as not as crazy as BKK just wander around a bit and you will figure out the lay out.
[QUOTE=Goatscrot;1595131]Spot on. Finding good employees is tough as they all know another job is right around the corner.[/QUOTE]Its known there are shortages in the highly skilled jobs. Most countries have many foreigners in IT like Indians for example and like myself. I don't work in my home country any more.
This does not provide alternate work for bargirls quite obviously. What are the well paid alternatives available to the poorly educated girls? I would estimate that Noo Dee the No. 1 girl in Suzi Wong makes well over 100 k per month, probably 120. Her education is not high but currently studying English. This is an exception of course. The average bar girl makes far less than this.
Some bar girls are only showing up sporadically when they need extra money. Nat No. 5 at Crazy House has the body that can pull a customer in a flash. However supposedly is rarely showing up to work. She is supposed to have a Tom girlfriend. May have some Farang guys supporting her too. Otherwise not sure where the money is coming from.
[QUOTE=Phordphan;1595093]Perhaps. It couldn't be any worse than the book-cooking going on in the USA.
However, based on conversations I've had with friends in the Ex-I'm and software industries, it's damned difficult to find help unless you're willing to pay through the nose. One company I know didn't pay their software development staff a year-end bonus (or maybe it was just very small, I'm not sure). Anyway, the entire team walked. After about a year they still haven't been able to replace any of them.[/QUOTE]I have a feeling that the company is not doing too well and the local techies know that. Or they are not paying at or better than market salaries. We are going off base from our discussion of chicas but I think the local economy does have a lot to do with the supply of chicas.
[QUOTE=PaulKausch;1595035]Thank you for straightening out the confusion I created with my poor notes and even poorer memory. So I was with Noon at SW. The thing is the Bua at Dollhouse was about as stocky, taller, but less busty than the SW girl I was with; and as I mentioned in a previous post, the SW lady had very toned legs like a runner. Though short, in my opinion they were her best feature. She did have a sturdy looking body. The Dollhouse lady had a thicker waist, so between the two ladies, the SW lady had more of an hour glass figure.[/QUOTE]"hour glass"? You really crack me up. ROFLMAO. Your memory is shot. You got distracted by the big sillies. Sticking 2 big sillies on was no help to my eye. I am oriented toward exceptional asses. You don't really mention the Ass. Noon does not have an "ass" to die for (not even close). Tits size is not so important to me.
My taste is rather picky and very "narrow" it seems, although skin colour doesn't matter to me. Certainly no Rubenesque girls for me.
Would be interesting to get some other opinions on Noon's figure. For me barely a 5 out of 10. Next time I am there I will ask some others what they think out of curiosity, in case I am the freak and have a strange view. It is known I hate the Baccara girl looks so that makes me weird.
Noon has skinny legs. Calves muscles are much smaller than Noo Dee (who weighs about 6 to 7 Kg. less for same height). Noon's thighs are not that wide but ass is a bit flat and shapeless rather than "peach" shaped. From waist up, Noon is big. This gives her an overall very straight body, in contrast to the "hour glass". Her waist to thigh ratio is rather poor. Thais call this body "bpum bpui" meaning not really fat but a little chubby or at least puffy. I don't believe her ass and legs have enough shape to even qualify for Rubinesque. I will check again next time in Suzi Wong. Noo Dee laughs loudly at the suggestion that Noon has a good body, and agrees more with my opinion. However she comes from the same bias as me, having a very slim tight toned body, no fat, and only A cups.
Its the tall, white skinned, Anne at SW that has a very "hourglass" figure with enhanced D cups, small waist, and broad thighs. So I refer to her as "Lara Croft". She gets a lot of business since the tits were done. They are amazing, even I admit, despite being assisted.
In Crazy House I will probably end up BFing the waitress, if she is available. She looks a bit like Jennifer Lawrence in the face with white skin and high cheekbones. Sweet girl. I can't really see what the figure is really like as she is clothed. LOL. I guess will have to try to mentally undress her and imagine it. Being an ass shape enthusiast, its difficult with a dress on. Tight fitting jeans would help much more.
[QUOTE=Goatscrot;1594980]Tourism is 6% of the Thai economy. A drop in the bucket. This is an export based economy.[/QUOTE]"Much of the tourist industry is dependent on sex workers and it makes up around 7 percent of the GDP -- more than rice exports," she says. "The International Labour Organisation found sex workers send home US $300 million a year to rural areas, which is more than any government development project. "
[URL]http://travel.cnn.com/bangkok/life/25-years-thailands-sex-industry-233135[/URL]
Although tourism is sharply down in 2014. Which explains the constant ISG reports of how easy it is to pick up the best looking "working girls" in BKK.
No doubt many of the average lookers are now laid off, unemployed & looking for minimum wage jobs, or having an unusually tough time pulling any customers.
With the upcoming crackdown by immigration, which has already begun at some borders & is to be enforced at airports next month, things may become much worse yet for the tourism industry, and "working girls". Many thousands of foreigners may flee the country, not be permitted to reenter for life, or see the handwriting on the wall & not even try to come to LOS. Dee day is August 12.