Printable View
[QUOTE=Saturn11;2918755]I would agree about Roxy being 10/10 for service. I know most people don't care about this sort of thing but she's also the nicest person I've ever met in any club.
If you don't mind me asking any reason Catalea didn't make your list? I thought you were a fan of hers.[/QUOTE]Roxy was Miss Sharks 2022 , defeating Brenda and Katalea.
[QUOTE=HappyTour;2918787]I planned to write another post explaining why Maria and Catelea are not in my current top seven list. Since some might be curious, I'll address it here.
Regarding Maria, I haven't seen her at the club during my visits over the past four weeks. My top seven list includes only those who are currently available, so Maria is excluded for this reason. If Maria were here, I would definitely rename my list as the 'Top Eight'. I would rate Maria's visual attractiveness as [B]9.5/10 [/B]and her service quality as 8/10. Her rank would be between Paris and Dilara.
Regarding why Catelea is not on the list either, the main reason is that she doesn't get business as consistently as the girls on the top seven list. Many times, she might sit idle at the side of the bar for hours, waiting for customers. However, I would still rate Catelea's visual attractiveness as 7-8/10 and her service quality as 8/10.[/QUOTE]We really have different eyes, when Maria. Ukr body is nothing wow, but real fire, all is possible in bed with her if You make her cum. Even not as fresh face as when I got her weekly on 2021 , but I would still rank supermodel body Katalea far more attractive look than Stacy, Baylies, Celine, Roxy, but she is not a real GFE. She decided to lower her service, or maybe she was not anymore able, when her pussy seemed not anymore able for caucasian way sex, after only few months, when she was elected Miss 2021 mainly for her look when highest levels, defeating Brenda and Roxy, so quite normal she lost business, at least with regulars, when yes, I often saw her warming her ass sitting at the bar. I also saw Stacy waiting and smiling at the bar, but with my face and hair, I had enough girlfriends at school, fkissing for hours and I prefer close to normal woman looks than schoolgirls. Unfortunately for me, normal woman looks are quite rare at Sharks since German snow white on beginning of Summer 2023 , so I left many times full balls, not good for speed, when legendary Colin Chapman told light is fast, Lotus culture, on autobahns.
[QUOTE=EscapeArtist;2918768]Understanding that, like so many topics here, these are quite subjective determinations. . . Classic Asian American preferences it seems. .[/QUOTE]The taste and preferences regarding what kind of girls one likes are definitely subjective. In spite of this fact, we can still identify the best group of girls from a large crowd through comparison and some relatively objective perspective and criteria.
However, we find that some unknown posters always fail to provide useful information of girls but are enthusiastic about finding fault with others' reports, akin to picking bones out of an egg.
Given the possibility that the poster might be Asian American, it's likely he is familiar with the East Asian proverb: "Some people declare the grapes to be sour merely because they cannot afford to have them. ".
Even if he is an Asian American, he couldn't possibly represent all Asian Americans, making it unsuitable to assert that girls in my top list are classic Asian American preferences.
For instance, the girls in my list are not primarily sought after by Asian American customers. Their main clientele consists of locals or Europeans. Certainly, based on my report, it's anticipated that there will be an increase in the number of Asians / Americans seeking girls from my top list. But you still can not say these seven girls represent classic Asian American preferences.
The true Asian hunters are Melanie, Emma, Simona, Mara, Juliana, Vanessa, Kathleen, Betty (the older one), Alina, Branda, and Kitty. Therefore, Escape Artist could readily declare that these girls cater to Asian American preferences and tastes. I don't imply whether they are good or not; they just simply aren't included in my top list.
[QUOTE=HappyTour;2918568]Approximately 100-120 girls worked at Sharks Club over the weekend. However, around 8-9 pm, half of the rooms on the second floor were empty. This led me to estimate that about 80% of the girls hadn't earned enough to cover their entrance fees by that time.
However, we cannot deny that approximately eight to ten girls were getting business almost nonstop. Not because they charged less or due to lower rates, but because their beauty and / or service distinguished them as top providers in the club. They are undoubtedly very popular among both frequent visitors and tourists.
I knew seven of them and recently had rooms with six in the past four weeks. I'd like to share some information for your reference. If you don't like these girls, please ignore them and refrain from being judgmental..[/QUOTE]Oh Stacy, I love her so much. She is such a beautiful and stunning girl, but a little bit too short for me unfortunately. Once I spent several hours with her. As far as I know she is not a college student anymore. Did she tell you she is currently studying? What do you mean she is very selective? I don't remember that she rejected anybody. I saw a Japanese guy who visits only Stacy at he club almost daily and I can't say that he is attractive, but of course it would be difficult to deserve her love, I saw a photo with Stacy and her ex-boyfriend and he is pretty handsome guy.
[QUOTE=HappyTour;2918957]The true Asian hunters are Melanie, Emma, Simona, Mara, Juliana, Vanessa, Kathleen, Betty (the older one), Alina, Branda, and Kitty.[/QUOTE]I wouldn't put Alina in that list, normally I see her sat towards the back with Sabrina and her regular customers come to her.
[QUOTE=HappyTour;2918957]The taste and preferences regarding what kind of girls one likes are definitely subjective. In spite of this fact, we can still identify the best group of girls from a large crowd through comparison and some relatively objective perspective and criteria.
However, we find that some unknown posters always fail to provide useful information of girls but are enthusiastic about finding fault with others' reports, akin to picking bones out of an egg.
Given the possibility that the poster might be Asian American, it's likely he is familiar with the East Asian proverb: "Some people declare the grapes to be sour merely because they cannot afford to have them. ".
Even if he is an Asian American, he couldn't possibly represent all Asian Americans, making it unsuitable to assert that girls in my top list are classic Asian American preferences.
For instance, the girls in my list are not primarily sought after by Asian American customers. Their main clientele consists of locals or Europeans. Certainly, based on my report, it's anticipated that there will be an increase in the number of Asians / Americans seeking girls from my top list. But you still can not say these seven girls represent classic Asian American preferences.
The true Asian hunters are Melanie, Emma, Simona, Mara, Juliana, Vanessa, Kathleen, Betty (the older one), Alina, Branda, and Kitty. Therefore, Escape Artist could readily declare that these girls cater to Asian American preferences and tastes. I don't imply whether they are good or not; they just simply aren't included in my top list.[/QUOTE]One of the worst rationalizations of the people who helped create the poor situation is the "can't afford it" crowd. Pretty much any American who regularly travels to Europe for hookers can afford it.
An even more irrelevant argument is the statement that a classic representation cannot represent all, an example of the use of the all or none logical fallacy. The word "classic" pretty much negates the rebuttal as not all is obviously inherent, or else the word "all" would have been used and not specifically classic.
The use of several older and fatter former Asian hunters seems out of place as Asian hunting has no role in this assessment as the verbage was Asian preferences. Girls like Emma and Melanie can hunt Asians all they want but they're not getting them since they've grown a bit too large to fall under the umbrella of classic Asian American preferences. Several of the teenie bopper girls listed however are exactly that type.
Ariana, Rachele, and Celine were all super popular with the Asian clients on my most recent visits. Celine less so because she's fat now.
I feel sorry for the guys who take the listing rating seriously, particularly the service ratings from a poster who has already stated that he does not care about service anymore.
[QUOTE=EscapeArtist;2919295]One of the worst rationalizations of the people who helped create the poor situation is the "can't afford it" crowd. Pretty much any American who regularly travels to Europe for hookers can afford it.
[/QUOTE]I disagree with this. If one refuses to see a WG based solely on price, and not on anything else, then one can't afford it. A billionaire isn't going to complain about price, and most mongers are not billionaires.
The point is there is a limit to how much someone can afford: its how much they are willing to pay. Ofcourse they have the money, that doest mean theyre willing to pay above a certain amount of that money. Otherwise, prostitution prices would be out of control even worse than today because people would just be giving Brenda 1000 euros an hour.
Just because I have x amount of money, doesnt mean I can afford x amount of women, because it could be above what Im willing to pay. And if Im not willing to pay it, despite more than having the money in my bank account, it means I cant afford it.
There are limits (aka affordability) to what the average monger is willing to pay for pussy, and when a WG crosses that threshold, her customer base decreases.
[QUOTE=Rocko20;2919408]I disagree with this. If one refuses to see a WG based solely on price, and not on anything else, then one can't afford it. A billionaire isn't going to complain about price, and most mongers are not billionaires.
The point is there is a limit to how much someone can afford: its how much they are willing to pay. Ofcourse they have the money, that doest mean theyre willing to pay above a certain amount of that money. Otherwise, prostitution prices would be out of control even worse than today because people would just be giving Brenda 1000 euros an hour.
Just because I have x amount of money, doesnt mean I can afford x amount of women, because it could be above what Im willing to pay. And if Im not willing to pay it, despite more than having the money in my bank account, it means I cant afford it.
There are limits (aka affordability) to what the average monger is willing to pay for pussy, and when a WG crosses that threshold, her customer base decreases.[/QUOTE]Although it is true that just because one has the money doesn't mean that one can afford to spend that money on a particular good or service, it doesn't logically follow that balking at spending the money due to the price [B]always[/B] equates to not being able to afford it. There have been plenty of times I have chosen not to go with a girl (or even to a particular country) based solely on price. Maybe it was because I thought she was trying to rip me off, or that there just wasn't enough value in what was being offered for the price. I had the money and could have easily afforded it, but I chose not to buy as a matter of [B]principle[/B].
I have the money to monger in places like Switzerland and the United Arab Emirates, but I choose not to return to those destinations not because I can't afford it, but because I know I can find [B]exactly[/B] what I want in other places like Germany and Brazil at much more favorable pricing bringing me greater [B]value[/B] for spending that money. Declining to spend based 100% on the price absolutely [B]does not[/B] always mean one can't afford what's on offer.
It could be that one is an informed consumer and is being smart with their money by looking for the right set of circumstances that brings them the value they seek. They may be well attuned to what a fair price ought to be for the goods or services sought, or even a "hard bargainer" by nature, and won't allow themselves to be gouged or ripped off or just determined to get it on their terms, whether they can afford to pay what's being asked or not. Some people are like that. There are lots of sensible reasons for why people decline to pay a particular price for something other than "I can't afford it". People don't get to be rich by always agreeing to pay the price asked without question just because they can. Wealthy people are often watching their bottom lines closer than anybody else! Believe this.
[QUOTE=TheCane;2919423]
It could be that one is an informed consumer and is being smart with their money by looking for the right set of circumstances that brings them the value they seek. They may be well attuned to what a fair price ought to be for the goods or services sought, or even a "hard bargainer" by nature, and won't allow themselves to be gouged or ripped off or just determined to get it on their terms, whether they can afford to pay what's being asked or not. Some people are like that. There are lots of sensible reasons for why people decline to pay a particular price for something other than "I can't afford it". People don't get to be rich by always agreeing to pay the price asked without question just because they can. Wealthy people are often watching their bottom lines closer than anybody else! Believe this.[/QUOTE]But not being able to afford something, is not an insult or a bad argument or a bad reason, it's reality. There's a fine line between affordability and unaffordability (or cheap and expensive) for many mongers. Many of the mongers sitting in the front of Sharks every day are elderly pensioners who rarely go to a room with a WG because "they can't afford it." In Thailand, the expat pensioners don't get WGs from the top brothels, because "they can't afford it," they get the street walkers. I've mongered in Dubai, there are men who won't walk into brothels because they're not willing to pay the $60 cover charge to get in (the place is called Red Square) because "they can't afford it. "
Furthermore, the terms "ripped off" or "gouged" are also not insults because they're subjective on who you ask. In Dubai, the going rate for an hour with a Russian is $272. Mongers who go to Thailand, Brazil, or the Dominican Republic would scoff at that. They would laugh at anyone going to Dubai and chalk it up as a “ripoff” or “gouge.”
But the point is that "I can't afford that" is a valid logical reason. Many mongers simply cannot afford certain prices and there is nothing wrong with that. Just ask the elderly pensioners in front of Sharks why they never go to a room.
[B] #8 - New Betty, [/B]Romanian, 20 yo. 170 cm.
Here, I introduce a beautiful newcomer: [B]Betty. [/B].
Many sharks regular visitors might scoff at this point. Isn't Betty that middle-aged woman who has been working for 8 years, isn't new or attractive, and has gained a lot of weight, notorious as an Asian hunter?
Not in that case.
[B]New Betty [/B]is 20 yo slender Romanian girl.
One early evening I was waiting for Ariana, I didn't know at that moment that she was booked by an American guy for very long session. After stay idle for very long time, I decided to find new target.
While getting food in the dining room, I suddenly noticed a girl whose back looked very much like Ariana, the only difference being that she was wearing a short instead of thongs.
I thought it was Ariana, so I called out her name. When the girl turned around, to my surprise, it wasn't Ariana. However, I was shocked to see that she was a young girl who was almost as beautiful and lovely as Ariana. Stunning beauty! Very young, white skin, almost No tattoo.
We then sat down together for dinner, and she told me her name was Betty. She has been at Sharks for 2 months. Previously, she worked at Samya and Oase for just a couple of months. I intentionally put on a surprised expression and said, "I heard the Betty here is a middle-aged overweight woman. I didn't expect it to be such a young, beautiful, and slender girl like you. " She gave me a playful pat and said, "You are so funny. ".
I told her that I would take her to the room for one hour. After I brushed my teeth, we walked towards the stairs. She suddenly stopped me and asked if I knew the price. I pretended to be surprised and said, "Then you tell me. " She said 200/ hour. I said OWO should be included in that. She said yes.
In the room, New Betty is exceptionally friendly and agreeable. In terms of service, I must say she is better than a novice. Of course, I care more about her appearance. New Betty seems to mirror Ariana to some extent, and she doesn't smoke cigarettes either. Now new Betty serves as a substitute for Ariana in my view when Ariana is absent from the club.
More and more people are identifying this gem. New Betty has become busy now.
Visual attractiveness: 9/10; Service quality: 7-8/10.
[QUOTE=Rocko20;2919408]I disagree with this. If one refuses to see a WG based solely on price, and not on anything else, then one can't afford it. A billionaire isn't going to complain about price, and most mongers are not billionaires.
The point is there is a limit to how much someone can afford: its how much they are willing to pay. Ofcourse they have the money, that doest mean theyre willing to pay above a certain amount of that money. Otherwise, prostitution prices would be out of control even worse than today because people would just be giving Brenda 1000 euros an hour.
Just because I have x amount of money, doesnt mean I can afford x amount of women, because it could be above what Im willing to pay. And if Im not willing to pay it, despite more than having the money in my bank account, it means I cant afford it.
There are limits (aka affordability) to what the average monger is willing to pay for pussy, and when a WG crosses that threshold, her customer base decreases.[/QUOTE]Not sure what the main point is as we seem to be in agreement that not being to afford and not willing are two different things. Unless someone is spending all of their money on the hobby, most mongers can afford 5 one hour rooms for 1000 e.
What is certainly of more significance is your recognition of the difference between not willing versus can't. The point is that the ridiculous assertion that inflation perpetrators use such a gaslighting argument to rationalize their role.
Regardless of the details, it is even more significant that the locals themselves are no longer attending, at least not the locals who kept prices down and quality up. Go to Sharks these days and you see significantly less older Germans. There are a lot more 100 e non-German locals and just less rooms being take over all.
The guys protecting their egos with faulty arguments of "can't afford" are doing no one any service.
[QUOTE=Rocko20;2919490]
But the point is that "I can't afford that" is a valid logical reason. Many mongers simply cannot afford certain prices and there is nothing wrong with that. Just ask the elderly pensioners in front of Sharks why they never go to a room.[/QUOTE]A bit off track, as there are certainly people who actually can't afford it. Or their spending habits in the clubs changed due to the price hikes because they couldn't afford their prior room counts or room times. Even the main perpetuator of this argument has admitted to changing his room counts due to the price hikes.
The point the entire time has been that a few posters attempt detract from their role in club deterioration by gaslighting the people who criticize them for their role in the price hikes by using this ridiculous douchebag argument one would hear coming from a junior finance bro with a half a million dollars of debt.
Hi,
Thank you for the report.
Can you give more indications for finding the girls? More details so that I can recognise them?
I will be at Sharks in two weeks.
Thank you.
[QUOTE=HappyTour;2918568]Approximately 100-120 girls worked at Sharks Club over the weekend. However, around 8-9 pm, half of the rooms on the second floor were empty. This led me to estimate that about 80% of the girls hadn't earned enough to cover their entrance fees by that time.
However, we cannot deny that approximately eight to ten girls were getting business almost nonstop. Not because they charged less or due to lower rates, but because their beauty and / or service distinguished them as top providers in the club. They are undoubtedly very popular among both frequent visitors and tourists.
I knew seven of them and recently had rooms with six in the past four weeks. I'd like to share some information for your reference. If you don't like these girls, please ignore them and refrain from being judgmental.
Here is the list:
[B] #7 - Roxy, [/B]Romanian, 26-27 yo.
All regular visitors are familiar with this exceptionally sweet girl. Despite being only 20 years old when she started at the club seven years ago, she quickly became a favorite among patrons, including myself and many others. On busy weekends, she would tirelessly attend to customers, going from room to room until well past midnight, often completing 10-12 sessions at least...[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=GiuseppeTrigli;2919804]Hi,Thank you for the report.Can you give more indications for finding the girls? More details so that I can recognise them?I will be at Sharks in two weeks.
Thank you.[/QUOTE]Since Escape Artist strongly disagrees that the girls in the list are the top ones, please ask him to provide a better list.
[QUOTE=EscapeArtist;2919295]
I feel sorry for the guys who take the listing rating seriously, particularly the service ratings. ..[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=HappyTour;2919541][B] #8 - New Betty, [/B]Romanian, 20 yo. 170 cm.
Here, I introduce a beautiful newcomer: [B]Betty. [/B].
Many sharks regular visitors might scoff at this point. Isn't Betty that middle-aged woman who has been working for 8 years, isn't new or attractive, and has gained a lot of weight, notorious as an Asian hunter?
Not in that case.
[B]New Betty [/B]is 20 yo slender Romanian girl.
One early evening I was waiting for Ariana, I didn't know at that moment that she was booked by an American guy for very long session. After stay idle for very long time, I decided to find new target.
While getting food in the dining room, I suddenly noticed a girl whose back looked very much like Ariana, the only difference being that she was wearing a short instead of thongs.
I thought it was Ariana, so I called out her name. When the girl turned around, to my surprise, it wasn't Ariana. However, I was shocked to see that she was a young girl who was almost as beautiful and lovely as Ariana. Stunning beauty! Very young, white skin, almost No tattoo.
We then sat down together for dinner, and she told me her name was Betty. She has been at Sharks for 2 months. Previously, she worked at Samya and Oase for just a couple of months. I intentionally put on a surprised expression and said, "I heard the Betty here is a middle-aged overweight woman. I didn't expect it to be such a young, beautiful, and slender girl like you. " She gave me a playful pat and said, "You are so funny. ".
I told her that I would take her to the room for one hour. After I brushed my teeth, we walked towards the stairs. She suddenly stopped me and asked if I knew the price. I pretended to be surprised and said, "Then you tell me. " She said 200/ hour. I said OWO should be included in that. She said yes.
In the room, New Betty is exceptionally friendly and agreeable. In terms of service, I must say she is better than a novice. Of course, I care more about her appearance. New Betty seems to mirror Ariana to some extent, and she doesn't smoke cigarettes either. Now new Betty serves as a substitute for Ariana in my view when Ariana is absent from the club.
More and more people are identifying this gem. New Betty has become busy now.
Visual attractiveness: 9/10; Service quality: 7-8/10.[/QUOTE]You had to ask for OWO for 200/60 ? Really amazing. I m surprised You didn t notice milky skin full natural Rosella who seems more fresh than Celine or Rachel for me. I chose to judge Sharks casting on Friday 31 May, thinking girls would be back from Easter and know guys just got paid. Seemed quite slow business when I arrived at 7 pm, Celine was not busy, Brenda waiting at the bar, Roxy turning around, wearing fishnet. Quite average foods, You took best shower told me a German, no wow for my pickiest eyes and brain. A little blond staying on entry, also not busy, was very smiling and welcoming, introducing herself as Rachel, asking for room, cute little Romanian but no wow to pay for, Rosella is sexier for me, but I need more attractive and woman image to feel desire. I saw some girls from Oase, a tall one who was sexier on previous Friday at Oase party. I stayed 10 hours, didn t feel desire, I must be too picky for Sharks casting when not impressed despite quantity, except maybe for 1 image I saw. I was happy to see Tara who may be higher level for BJ than Sylvana. No Sena nor Sabina nor Katalea nor Stacy seen, not 100% sure for Stacy. I easily felt desire at my best quality GG on Saturday, my Russian woman with highest potential for fucking, telling: You gave me good service, after her pleasure, offering me at chocolate, as I told her: like with a dog who made good job. Sex with her is great, no too big, too hard and I know her spots, since our more than 15 hours. But 1 hour of high level with her cost same than 30 mn with a little Romanian at Sharks, even I understood rate could be different for different guys at Sharks.