-
4 photos
In case there is any doubt about this,
Despite Donald Trump's constant and unrelenting lying spree on these issues, the rate of inflation is higher now under Trump than it was under Biden, the price of groceries god I'm glad Trump invented that word is higher now under Trump than it was under Biden, jobs creation is crap under Trump after soaring to historic highs under Biden, the clear majority of Americans think the economy is worse now under Trump than it was under Biden and they justifiably blame this crap economy on Trump, not Biden:
[B]Sellers are taking homes off the market at the fastest pace in nearly a decade.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/25/home-sellers-delisting-redfin.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Weak buyer demand, weakening home prices and overall uncertainty in the economy are combining to make home sellers change their minds and step out of the market.
Close to 85,000 U.S. sellers took their homes off the market in September, up 28% from September 2024 and the highest level for that month in eight years, according to Redfin. [/QUOTE][B]Fact check: Trumps lying spree about inflation[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/10/politics/inflation-trump-fact-check[/URL]
[QUOTE]President Donald Trump went on a lying spree about inflation last week.
Grocery prices. Gas prices. Prescription drug prices. Overall prices. Over just three days, Trump made false claims about all of them.[/QUOTE][B]Higher costs weigh on Americans' holiday shopping plans this year: CNBC survey.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/28/black-friday-holiday-shopping-prices-spending-cutbacks.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Many Americans feel pinched by an uneven economy and higher costs in particular, and it will negatively influence planned shopping habits this holiday season, according to the annual CNBC|SurveyMonkey 2025 Small Business Saturday Survey.
80 percent of Americans think items are more expensive this year.
Four in ten plan to spend less this year as a result, with the biggest cutbacks planned in gifts for others.[/QUOTE][B]Donald Trump Worse on Economy Than Joe BidenFox News Poll[/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-worse-on-economy-than-joe-biden-fox-news-poll-11080612[/URL]
[QUOTE]President Donald Trump's standing on the economy has taken a hit, according to a new Fox News poll that finds voters now rate him less favorably on the issue than President Joe Biden.[/QUOTE]The bad news is doubling and tripling down on already crap Repub economic, tariff, tax and immigration policy as Trump most certainly intends to do only means these crap conditions are destined to get much worse between now and when a Dem Congress and then a Dem President steps in to produce yet another in their uninterrupted Great Dem Recoveries from yet another historic Great Repub Economic and National Security Downturn. And this one promises to be a whopper.
-
Touche'
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3039634]Despite Donald Trump's constant and unrelenting lying spree on these issues, the rate of inflation is higher now under Trump than it was under Biden, the price of groceries god I'm glad Trump invented that word is higher now under Trump than it was under Biden, jobs creation is crap under Trump after soaring to historic highs under Biden, the clear majority of Americans think the economy is worse now under Trump than it was under Biden and they justifiably blame this crap economy on Trump, not Biden:
[B]Sellers are taking homes off the market at the fastest pace in nearly a decade.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/25/home-sellers-delisting-redfin.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[B]Fact check: Trumps lying spree about inflation[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/10/politics/inflation-trump-fact-check[/URL]
[B]Higher costs weigh on Americans' holiday shopping plans this year: CNBC survey.[/B].[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQCoh_bNFy0[/URL]
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Field of EV Dream Charging Stations
The world's largest Supercharger station in Lost Hills, California, has opened with a 164-stall facility powered by an 11 MW solar farm, 10 Megapack batteries and is virtually off-grid and self sufficient.
[B]Its the Biggest Supercharger Station Ever—And It's Powered By Solar And Batteries,[/B] Nov 25,2025. [URL]https://insideevs.com/news/780042/tesla-biggest-supercharger-solar-powered-megapack-storage/[/URL]
No [NOPARSE]dirty and polluting fossil fuels...NO PROBLEM! No CO2 smoke induced belching oil, gasoline, petrol or ethanol tankers to refill...NO PROBLEM! Just CLEAN electricity, produced on site, from it's 11 MW solar farm. What could be simpler or more [/NOPARSE]natural?
This power charging station, represents a replicable blueprint for future EV infrastructure, especially in areas with limited grid capacity. It is significant shift in how large-scale EVs infrastructures (for cars and trucks) can be deployed, as self-sustaining energy centers.
No doubt, Europe and The Global South is watching, as another shinning example of how to wean themselves off toxic petrostate fossil fuels.
-
What's LOOKS got to do with it?
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3039243]They look like women they talk like women etc etc etc.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/11/25/sen-ruben-gallego-trashes-own-party-in-leaked-texts-dem-men-look-like-women/[/URL]
The DNC has been neutered aka feminized Cucks / simps.[/QUOTE]Again with the culture wars, bullshit? [B]What the fuck has LOOKS got to do with governing?[/B] ONLY under the pathetic leadership of your MAGA Fuhrer, would governing and running the country, need to look like one of his USA Beauty Pageants, where he perversely goes backstage, to accost, abuse and fondle the constants.
I guess if you, Repub suckers, were planning to fuck your local state Senator (s), then perhaps, how a Senator looks to matter, to y'all.
All Dems require from their Senators, is the ability for good stewardship, governing well and be very competent at their jobs.
But it is interestingly funny to note, it's yet another dumbass culture war post that Republicans continually focus on and not the task of governing the country, with a pedo sympathizer to Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxell.
BTW, I'm still waiting for Repubs to recycle and revive their, infamous "Purple Dinosaur" culture wars!
-
When what is happening inside USA is only Americans fault, when they already knew about dangerous, shameful, robber Trump, but I really wish poor, courageous Ukrainians won t be fucked by this old crazy who love so much to suck and swallow criminal Putin. USA being led by Russia, after being defeated by China, IBM and Motorola being Chinese.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3039725]Again with the culture wars, bullshit? [B]What the fuck has LOOKS got to do with governing?[/B] ONLY under the pathetic leadership of your MAGA Fuhrer, would governing and running the country, need to look like one of his USA Beauty Pageants, where he perversely goes backstage, to accost, abuse and fondle the constants.
I guess if you, Repub suckers, were planning to fuck your local state Senator (s), then perhaps, how a Senator looks to matter, to y'all.
All Dems require from their Senators, is the ability for good stewardship, governing well and be very competent at their jobs.
But it is interestingly funny to note, it's yet another dumbass culture war post that Republicans continually focus on and not the task of governing the country, with a pedo sympathizer to Jeffery Epstein and Ghislaine Maxell.
BTW, I'm still waiting for Repubs to recycle and revive their, infamous "Purple Dinosaur" culture wars![/QUOTE]Did Epstein files topple Trump Presidency yet? Still waiting LOL. What's the next scam Dems will come up with.
-
3 photos
Trump and his MAGAs killed their October BLS jobs report. Therefore:
Thankfully, there are other credible sources for an October 2025 Trump Economy Jobs Report aside from the government-provided data that no Republican president in 100 years has cherished being reported, least of all disastrous Republican so-called president Donald Trump.
Oh, look! It's another "Worst since a previous Repub president's time" disastrous report:
[B]US layoffs for October surge to two-decade high, Challenger data shows.
Nov. 7, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/business/world-at-work/layoffs-us-october-surge-two-decade-high-challenger-data-shows-2025-11-06/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Nov 6 (Reuters) - U.S.-based employers cut more than 150,000 jobs in October, marking [b]the biggest reduction for the month in more than 20 years[/b], a report by Challenger, Gray & Christmas said on Thursday as industries adopt AI-driven changes and intensify cost cuts.
Tech firms led the job cuts in the private sector, followed by retailers and the services sector, the global outplacement company said.
Cost-cutting was the top reason for the layoffs in October, followed by artificial intelligence, while "DOGE Impact" was the leading reason for job cuts in 2025.
[B]The layoffs in October surged 175% from a year ago to 153,074. [/b]From the start of the year to October end, [b]employers have announced 1,099,500 job cuts, a 65% rise from 664,839 in the same time period last year.[/b]
So far this year, [b]job cuts are at the highest level since 2020 [/b]when 2,304,755 cuts were announced through October.[/QUOTE]Yep. "Worst" since GW Bush and Trump, all on one report. And now Trump can crow / lie about how terrible Biden's results were after his layoffs are 175% higher than the far, far superior jobs numbers under Biden.
Meanwhile, typically pro Repub Mainstream Media will continue to spin how much better Repubs are at "handling the economy" than Dems as we move into an election year. Lolol.
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3039734]When what is happening inside USA is only Americans fault, when they already knew about dangerous, shameful, robber Trump, but I really wish poor, courageous Ukrainians won t be fucked by this old crazy who love so much to suck and swallow criminal Putin. USA being led by Russia, after being defeated by China, IBM and Motorola being Chinese.[/QUOTE]Fortunately for Ukraine, versus USA robbers and sucking Putin, no one can give a part of Ukraine, according to Ukrainian constitution, except citizens vote. And Europe try more to help Ukraine.
-
Yeah
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3040077]Fortunately for Ukraine, versus USA robbers and sucking Putin, no one can give a part of Ukraine, according to Ukrainian constitution, except citizens vote. And Europe try more to help Ukraine.[/QUOTE]I'm with you man. And I apologize for the worthless cunts in our government that won't step up. Sadly, we have a bunch of Putin cocksuckers running things.
-
[QUOTE=FutureDeadGuy;3040110]I'm with you man. And I apologize for the worthless cunts in our government that won't step up. Sadly, we have a bunch of Putin cocksuckers running things.[/QUOTE]What should those worthless cunts do about it? What is the solution? Force Americans and European Union into war? Keep spending our tax dollars on a war that isn't our fight?
-
4 photos
Costco must not understand Trump's Tariffs
WTF are the people at Costco trying to pull? As everyone who believes whatever Trump says knows full well, [I]China, Canada. Mexico, Brazil, India, etc[/I] are paying America Trillions of Dollars every time Americans buy those imported goods. The money comes "flowing into" America from those other countries. Nobody in America pays Trump's American import taxes!
Come on, everybody. Trump wouldn't continue to tell the American Working Men and Women Consumers that practically every day if it wasn't true.
Thank god, too. Because if Costco wins this lawsuit, then the American Taxpayers will have to pay big money to Costco!
[B]Costco sues for Trump tariff refunds before Supreme Court rules if they're illegal[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/01/costco-sues-trump-tariffs-trade-supreme-court.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3040258]WTF are the people at Costco trying to pull? As everyone who believes whatever Trump says knows full well, [I]China, Canada. Mexico, Brazil, India, etc[/I] are paying America Trillions of Dollars every time Americans buy those imported goods. The money comes "flowing into" America from those other countries. Nobody in America pays Trump's American import taxes!
Come on, everybody. Trump wouldn't continue to tell the American Working Men and Women Consumers that practically every day if it wasn't true.
Thank god, too. Because if Costco wins this lawsuit, then the American Taxpayers will have to pay big money to Costco!
[B]Costco sues for Trump tariff refunds before Supreme Court rules if they're illegal[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/01/costco-sues-trump-tariffs-trade-supreme-court.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL][/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2025/12/02/noem-flags-sweeping-travel-ban-on-countries-dumping-killers-leeches-and-entitlement-junkies-on-u-s/[/URL]
-
3 photos
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3040309][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2025/12/02/noem-flags-sweeping-travel-ban-on-countries-dumping-killers-leeches-and-entitlement-junkies-on-u-s/[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]"I just met with the President. I am recommending a full travel ban on every damn country thats been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies, Noem wrote on social media site X.[/QUOTE]If Trump imposes a full travel ban on the USA States flooding America with killers, leeches and entitlement junkies that will be the end of Red State tourists traveling to Thailand.
I would support that.
-
2 photos
MAGA Fuhrer, attempts a new presidential limbo bar record?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3039784]Did Epstein files topple Trump Presidency yet? Still waiting LOL. What's the next scam Dems will come up with.[/QUOTE]Hilarious. , as the latest headlines, speak volumes and say it loud and clear [I]..."How LOW can you go?"[/I][NOPARSE] and it's only been 10 months [i](kkkk!).[/i][/NOPARSE] [B]Trump's Approval Rating Drops to 36%, New Second-Term Low,[/B] November 28,2025 [URL]https://news.gallup.com/poll/699221/trump-approval-rating-drops-new-second-term-low.aspx[/URL].
Yet [NOPARSE] another LAME DUCK MAGA Fuhrer president 2.0! You just got to love the Epstein Pedo Sex Files, quietly doing it's [/NOPARSE]magic!
-
That would include you too dum dum
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3040355]If Trump imposes a full travel ban on the USA States flooding America with killers, leeches and entitlement junkies that will be the end of Red State tourists traveling to Thailand.
I would support that.[/QUOTE]Just move near Scumbag Birdbrain Kamala, you'll fit right in lololol I'm guessing you wouldn't last long.
The only white guy is why you left, never to return in the first place.
-
[QUOTE=FutureDeadGuy;3040110]I'm with you man. And I apologize for the worthless cunts in our government that won't step up. Sadly, we have a bunch of Putin cocksuckers running things.[/QUOTE]Despite long time deep sucking, liar Putin really makes fun of MAGA with the too old senile.
-
I dumped my Costco card 20+ yrs ago
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3040258]WTF are the people at Costco trying to pull? As everyone who believes whatever Trump says knows full well, [I]China, Canada. Mexico, Brazil, India, etc[/I] are paying America Trillions of Dollars every time Americans buy those imported goods. The money comes "flowing into" America from those other countries. Nobody in America pays Trump's American import taxes!
Come on, everybody. Trump wouldn't continue to tell the American Working Men and Women Consumers that practically every day if it wasn't true.
Thank god, too. Because if Costco wins this lawsuit, then the American Taxpayers will have to pay big money to Costco!
[B]Costco sues for Trump tariff refunds before Supreme Court rules if they're illegal[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/01/costco-sues-trump-tariffs-trade-supreme-court.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL][/QUOTE]But I still go in there with a family member once in a while and guess what its customer base is? 95% CCP fans they love that garbage made in the land of Xi.
Go in the huge lot and 99% cars are made in the land of Xi they hate America and Americans just like you.
They have zero love for America I say deport every single one of them too even the ones shit out here!!
I'm almost 60 and get around the world and the USA and have never in my life seen a CCP fan drive an American car?
They talk about their love for the country of their ancestors even if they were shit out here, but never love for USA.
I wish Pete Hegseth would nuke Shanghai and Beijing Hong Kong off the map already.
-
3 photos
Interesting
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3040389]But I still go in there with a family member once in a while and guess what its customer base is? 95% CCP fans they love that garbage made in the land of Xi.
Go in the huge lot and 99% cars are made in the land of Xi they hate America and Americans just like you.
They have zero love for America I say deport every single one of them too even the ones shit out here!!
I'm almost 60 and get around the world and the USA and have never in my life seen a CCP fan drive an American car?
They talk about their love for the country of their ancestors even if they were shit out here, but never love for USA.
I wish Pete Hegseth would nuke Shanghai and Beijing Hong Kong off the map already.[/QUOTE]You proudly announce you don't contribute to American Commerce but the Chinese who come to America do contribute to it.
So then you proudly announce that you spend your time and money traveling outside of America to contribute to other countries' commerce.
Clearly, those Chinese are demonstrating more "love" for America and what it has to offer, certainly contribute more value to America than some Trump-supporting MAGA deadbeat who only pops into Costco to eat the free food samples.
Hell, even I probably buy more items from USA Amazon and contribute more positive value to the country than whiny MAGA leeches and entitlement junkie Red Staters.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3040389]But I still go in there with a family member once in a while and guess what its customer base is? 95% CCP fans they love that garbage made in the land of Xi.
Go in the huge lot and 99% cars are made in the land of Xi they hate America and Americans just like you.
They have zero love for America I say deport every single one of them too even the ones shit out here!!
I'm almost 60 and get around the world and the USA and have never in my life seen a CCP fan drive an American car?
They talk about their love for the country of their ancestors even if they were shit out here, but never love for USA.
I wish Pete Hegseth would nuke Shanghai and Beijing Hong Kong off the map already.[/QUOTE]'But I still go in there with a family ... '
Its the economy stupid, if 95% of things in america would be made in america you would had to make drastic change into your lifestyle based on consomation or allow slavery after kicking out all your latin cheap labour.
'Go in the huge lot and ... '.
First I think most people can respect what usa made when its good thing, but people arent blind and the country also made huge mystak and terrible thing all over the world like all great power made into manking history. Xi people are also brain washed by the propaganda, it should open your eyes and look at what is happning now in usa because its the model trump is setting up currently in usa.
'They have zero love...'
Thes speech about loving usa is pure bullshit used by trump to play with maga weak mind. Why is so many people believe him when he is talking about love, the dude is a sociopath, he probably can't love someone else then himself. The concept of loving a foreign country is absurd and only kids can believe in that without being taged as stupid. They is no love in international affair but only cold political and economical decision. BTW your country foundation had been built by slave like current russia had be built by the prisonner of the goulag. The only diffenece into the model was that the north american slaves was black exploited by private corporation and the prisonner of the gulag was russia exploited by govenmental jail syustem.
'I'm almost 60 and ...?
You clearly need so economical teaching, do you have any idea about their wage? The middle and the poor class can't even dream about buying an american car in russia and China, the reason why there still american car is because the car from foreign country are taxed and there is quotas since the 80's. Curent chinese car are tarifes 100% in Canada and the japanese car have quota to protect the north american car industry. Your car industry cant even been competive in your richest and closest neighbor with transport fees who are almost of 0$(+truck gaz) because of the ACEUM while the competition is selling car after thousand of mile floated on shipping boat way more expensive then truck. The north american car industry is not competitive since asian country began to product car, america never had this problem with russian car like lada, but the asian car are far superior in terms of quality and they cost 1/4 of the price of an american car. The curent north american model is denying its own capitalist ideology to protect an industry who should had drasticaly evolved or died 50 years ago.
'They talk about their love for the country ...'
They have 0 freedom of speech, most are under very aggresive autocratic propaganda and can't travel outside of their country. They have no clear idea about what the wolrd is.
'I wish Pete Hegseth ...'
I bet you voted trump and you still proud of it and convinced that he his going to make you a richest person. Because that's what billionnaire are doing in politics, they are making other people richer, right? nuking the world as solution .. did you just get a bad news from your physician to hope seeing our beautifull world end under a nuclear fallout?
-
4 photos
Just cruising through Costco to eat the free food samples has dire consequences
But deadbeat MAGA Repubs voting for other deadbeat Repub MAGAs, especially Trump, has produced even more dire consequences for America:
[B]Private payrolls unexpectedly fell by 32,000 in November, ADP reports[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/03/adp-jobs-report-november-2025-private-payrolls-unexpectedly-fell-by-32000-.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The U.S. labor market slowdown intensified in November as private companies cut 32,000 workers, with small businesses hit the hardest, payrolls processing firm ADP reported Wednesday.
With worries intensifying over the domestic jobs picture, ADP indicated the issues were worse than anticipated. The payrolls decline marked a sharp step down from October, which saw an upwardly revised gain of 47,000 positions, and was well below the Dow Jones consensus estimate from economists for an increase of 40,000.
..........
The rate of pay also slowed, with workers staying in their jobs seeing a 4.4% year-over-year increase, down 0.1 percentage point from October.[/QUOTE]Meanwhile, MAGAs are all wet and excited about the fact that Trump's utterly predictable Repub economic slowdown has caused the average price of a gallon of regular gas be a whole 4 cents less than it was a year ago under Biden.
However, that was when the rate of inflation and the prices of commonly bought goods overall were steadily declining rather than steadily increasing as they have been this year.
Oh well. We tried.
FAFO.
Chinese tourists who travel to America and buy things are more positive and beneficial for America than anyone who could have but did not vote for Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. Just to name a few.
-
More pathetic lies from Tokyo Rose / Hanoi Jane
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3040439]You proudly announce you don't contribute to American Commerce but the Chinese who come to America do contribute to it.
So then you proudly announce that you spend your time and money traveling outside of America to contribute to other countries' commerce.
Clearly, those Chinese are demonstrating more "love" for America and what it has to offer, certainly contribute more value to America than some Trump-supporting MAGA deadbeat who only pops into Costco to eat the free food samples.
Hell, even I probably buy more items from USA Amazon and contribute more positive value to the country than whiny MAGA leeches and entitlement junkie Red Staters.[/QUOTE]BTW when I travel I always fly with American carriers as my #1 choice 99% of the time.
Stay in American chain hotels as my #1 choose whenever possible.
And eat American food at American chains 24/7 Hooters BK Pizza Hut Dominos McDs KFC Subway Sabarro Wendys etc etc etc.
If it wasn't for American food I would starve to death before eating their filthy slop they call food.
With a couple exceptions namely Lima and Moscow.
I love the USA with all my Heart, I'm not a traitor like you.
I won't bother replying to each lie you wrote in the post above you can't even.
Keep the debate to facts, you hate the Truth so you resort to lame ass lies.
To muddy the issues, like a desperate 12 yo girl.
May all the haters of the USA burn in hell!
God Bless America and Our Lord and Savior!
-
After 40+ yrs of so called right-wing "CRUSADE ON DRUGS", Repubs have learnt nothing!
Why am I not shocked the MAGA Fuhrer is set to pardon [U]YET ANOTHER[/U], drug kingpin? The joke sitting in the WH, with the red MAGA cap proves once again, he cares very little for the drugs that are responsible for killing Americans.
[B]The Ex-President Whom Trump Plans to Pardon Flooded America With Cocaine,[/B] November 29,2025 [URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/29/nyregion/honduras-hernandez-drug-trafficking.html[/URL].
You know, for all the knucklehead talk and rhetoric about immigrants [NOPARSE] trafficking drugs, which 96% of the time, is all lies, a ruse, subterfuge or a red herring, meant to ply the gullible MAGA suckers with enough "red meat" (like low-hanging fruit), only designed, to keep them sedated or tranquilized, long enough to pick their pockets, as is the case with the latest pretext of threats of a war on drugs with Venezuela.
So after some 40+ years of right-wing drug wars and so called, "Crusade on Drugs", from Reagan to the MAGA Fuhrer, and STILL Repubs have learnt nothing. Yes after 40+ years of being suckered and bamboozled into thinking the proverbial drug boogeyman, are the low-level foot soldiers and immigrant scapegoats, while their Fuhrer pardons the very drug kingpins, barons and overlords, responsible for flooding America with 500 tons of illegal[/NOPARSE] drugs.
But who can blame them, when it's [B]the perfect "red meat" bait,[/B] for their gullible base, to think that Repubs are [B]"Tough On Crime".[/B] Look over here while we (Hegseth and MAGA idiots), brag about blowing up a few low level foot soldiers and presumed traffickers (or no doubt likely to be innocent civilians), but whatever you do, don't look over here, where the MAGA Fuhrer, pardons the drug kingpins, bombarding and flooding America with 500 tons of cocaine.
Once again, your MAGA Fuhrer, has made you MAGA suckers, look like complete and utter dolts, dumbasses and imbeciles, when you crow about a few immigrants and low level drug busts, when the real culprits are being pardoned by your Fuhrer for [B]flooding, poisoning and killing Americas with 500 tons of cocaine.[/B].
But hey, who cares if Americas are getting drugged up and dying from fentanyl, cocaine or heroine, as long as the MAGA Fuhrer is pardoning drug kingpins and criminals, because according to some MAGA suckers, here, [I]"...as long as it puts money in peoples pocket (namely the Fuhrer and his billionaire buddies)...",[/I] yeah who cares?
-
3 photos
Well, of course they did.
Who in their right mind did not know a vote for anyone other than Kamala Harris would produce this result instead of the utter and total Bullshit campaign promises made by a Repub, especially by lifelong career conman Donald Trump?
Do I even need to highlight the "Worst since a previous Repub administration" references and negative Repub policy and stewardship results vs the historically positive Dem administration policy and stewardship results reported here that have also been as predictable as night following day for the past 100 years or so?
Yeah, I probably do need to do that:
[B]Layoff announcements top 1.1 million in 2025, the highest since 2020.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/04/layoff-announcements-this-year-top-1point1-million-the-most-since-2020-when-pandemic-hit-challenger-says.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Announced job cuts from U.S. employers moved further ahead of 1 million for the year in November as corporate restructuring, artificial intelligence and tariffs have helped pare job rolls, consulting firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported Thursday.
The firm said layoff plans totaled 71,321 in November, a step down from the massive cuts announced in October but still enough to bring the 2025 total up to 1.17 million. [B]That total is 54% higher than the same 11-month period a year ago and the highest level since 2020, when the Covid pandemic rocked the global economy.[/b]
..........
Hiring prospects have been dim this year as well, according to the Challenger report. Employers have announced 497,151 planned hires, [b]off 35% from the same point in 2024.[/b][/QUOTE]
-
Funny
We have same kind of robber in France than Trump robbed USA and they are friends. Here is our Bernard Arnault who started like Musk with our money in France.
-
Pete 'Double Tap' Hegseth, what a MAGA DEI joke!
Have you ever seen, such a spineless, cowardly coward and total fuck up, as Pete "Double Tap" Hegseth?
[B]Pentagon's Signalgate review finds Pete Hegseth violated military regulations,[/B] December 03,2025. [URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/pentagons-signalgate-review-finds-pete-hegseth-violated-military-regul-rcna247023[/URL]
If it wasn't clear from Signalgate, what at total and complete idiot, inept fool and what a danger to national security, he was and has become, then the latest "double tap" scandal, will no doubt be no different. Again, you have to wonder if Repubs, have learnt anything from any one of his many previous blunders?
But really, who needs military enemies and foes, like Russia and China, when you've got incompetent idiots like Hegseth, ruining, corrupting and turning the USA Military into a national joke.
[U]The Quintessential MAGA DEI Hire![/U]
Pete [NOPARSE]"Double Tap" Hegseth, will remain the ultimate, CLASSIC prime example, of the inept white male privileged MAGA DEI hire, failing upwards and just the most hilarious government MAGA DEI hire, ever!
Only in the QAnon/MAGA/Repub party can you FAIL [/NOPARSE]upwards!
-
When senile orange never deserved peace Nobel award, when only about money for him, but no care about people, but he received award from FIFA led by same gangster than him, Infantino. Gangsters, same than criminals, are friends.
-
Whatever you say Rosie 555 you can't last 2 minutes around here
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3040612]Who in their right mind did not know a vote for anyone other than Kamala Harris would produce this result instead of the utter and total Bullshit campaign promises made by a Repub, especially by lifelong career conman Donald Trump?
Do I even need to highlight the "Worst since a previous Repub administration" references and negative Repub policy and stewardship results vs the historically positive Dem administration policy and stewardship results reported here that have also been as predictable as night following day for the past 100 years or so?
Yeah, I probably do need to do that:
[B]Layoff announcements top 1.1 million in 2025, the highest since 2020.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/04/layoff-announcements-this-year-top-1point1-million-the-most-since-2020-when-pandemic-hit-challenger-says.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL][/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2025/12/07/rosie-odonnells-therapist-told-her-to-ignore-trump-for-two-days-she-only-lasted-two-hours/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3040531]BTW when I travel I always fly with American carriers as my #1 choice 99% of the time.
Stay in American chain hotels as my #1 choose whenever possible.
And eat American food at American chains 24/7 Hooters BK Pizza Hut Dominos McDs KFC Subway Sabarro Wendys etc etc etc.
If it wasn't for American food I would starve to death before eating their filthy slop they call food.
With a couple exceptions namely Lima and Moscow.
I love the USA with all my Heart, I'm not a traitor like you.
I won't bother replying to each lie you wrote in the post above you can't even.
Keep the debate to facts, you hate the Truth so you resort to lame ass lies.[/QUOTE]Boing don't seem much safe anymore, fall for quality. American foods are so low quality, making so many obese. As far I know, USA are melting pot of foreigners and many past slaves, like Mickael Jordan or Jackson, or Lebron James, or Louis Armstrong roots, when they killed Indians to rob lands. Built on robbery, Trump perfectly understood this.
-
4 photos
As surely as night follows day. And the world is watching.
The world of USA Agriculture customers is watching to see just how stupid American farmers will prove themselves to be after already proving themselves to be the dumbest Repub MAGA hillbillies in history by not voting for the Dem candidate and voting for Repub Trump not once, not twice but an astonishingly stupid three times.
Lololol:
[B]Trump announces $12 billion aid package for farmers caught up in trade war[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/08/trump-farmer-aid-trade-tariffs-china.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]President Donald Trump announced a $12 billion aid package for U.S. farmers, described as bridge payments to smooth the transition away from Biden-era economic policies.
Some in Americas agriculture industry say they are suffering as a result of Trumps wide-ranging trade war especially due to conflicts with China, a major U.S. customer.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins joined Trump for the announcement.
President Donald Trump announced Monday that his administration is doling out a $12 billion aid package to farmers who have been squeezed by a trade war between the U.S. and its top economic partners.
The funds will come from U.S. tariff revenues, Trump said during a roundtable event at the White House.
[/QUOTE]Are American farmers as blitheringly ignorant about Real News and as blitheringly stupid about simple math as Donald we're going to reduce drug prices by 1,500% Trump and his Numbskull Cabinet Members obviously assume they are?
Inquiring minds around the world want to know. Lololol. And I suppose we will all find out at the 2026 Midterm Elections.
-
Felon Con Man MAGA Racists
Trump and his trash administration are a complete Joke! The economy is the worse it has ever been and now wants war with Venezuela all his policies have failed dude is a complete Loser.
-
Farmers voting against their own best interest
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3041174]The world of USA Agriculture customers is watching to see just how stupid American farmers will prove themselves to be after already proving themselves to be the dumbest Repub MAGA hillbillies in history by not voting for the Dem candidate and voting for Repub Trump not once, not twice but an astonishingly stupid three times.
Lololol:
[B]Trump announces $12 billion aid package for farmers caught up in trade war[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/08/trump-farmer-aid-trade-tariffs-china.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
Are American farmers as blitheringly ignorant about Real News and as blitheringly stupid about simple math as Donald we're going to reduce drug prices by 1,500% Trump and his Numbskull Cabinet Members obviously assume they are?
Inquiring minds around the world want to know. Lololol. And I suppose we will all find out at the 2026 Midterm Elections.[/QUOTE]Yet another group of suckers, voting against their own best interest. Somehow, I don't think they've learnt anything.
In his first term it was $28 billion in aid to bailout farmers, for his fail economic polices against China, which by the way, disproportionately benefited corporate farms, rather than small family farms, is likely to be no different this time around.
The bulk of bailout of tariff and taxpayers dollars, will again, no doubt, be given to welfare RED STATES farmers, where once again, Big Agro will have the opportunity to contributed $196 million to Republican campaign, in 2026,2028 elections, like they did in 2023-2024.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Heavy & Light duty BEV Trucks sales surge!
China is [NOPARSE]quietly destroying, any long-term Western LNG/Hydrogen/Diesel ambitions, of being a major supplier to the Global South, for fueling and supplying heavy & light duty trucks, as new energy and electric Heavy & Light duty truck sales [/NOPARSE]surge.
Sales of new energy heavy trucks in China surged by 175% (yoy) in the first half of 2025, reaching around 76,100 units and capturing a significant portion (about 22-25%) of the new heavy truck sales market, with analysts estimating, sales may reach as much as 60% by early 2026. [URL]https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/soaring-electric-truck-sales-deal-new-blow-diesel-use-china-2025-07-11/[/URL].
[B]Los Angeles Times China's diesel trucks are shifting to electric,[/B] Nov 27,2025. [URL]https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2025-11-27/chinas-diesel-trucks-are-shifting-to-electric-that-could-change-global-lng-diesel-demand[/URL].
While [NOPARSE]back in the U.S. the very slow adaption of BEV Trucks, is catching on as one of the biggest short and long haul freight carriers DHL, is set to buy a several more Tesla Semi-Trucks to add to its fleet, does signal a step in the right direction, but again just like the lag in adaption in EVs, China set to leap-frog the west in advancements with better, more efficient and cleaner fuel cost-savings BEV Trucks. [/NOPARSE][B]DHL takes delivery of its first Tesla Semi electric truck, says more to come next year,[/B] Dec 8th, 2025. [URL]https://electrek.co/2025/12/08/dhl-takes-tesla-semi-electric-truck/[/URL].
But is west, just little too late, to the game? Once again European companies, like Mercedes Daimlerchrysler Trucks, are gobsmacked at the technological advancements of Chinese electric vehicle (BEV) trucks and facing intense competitive pressure from the rapid growth, which is leading to extreme revised forecasts for diesel demand, as the ROI on BEV trucks, is significantly better, saving companies ten's of thousands of dollars per truck, in efficiencies and fueling.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3040715]Have you ever seen, such a spineless, cowardly coward and total fuck up, as Pete "Double Tap" Hegseth?
[B]Pentagon's Signalgate review finds Pete Hegseth violated military regulations,[/B] December 03,2025. [URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/pentagons-signalgate-review-finds-pete-hegseth-violated-military-regul-rcna247023[/URL]
If it wasn't clear from Signalgate, what at total and complete idiot, inept fool and what a danger to national security, he was and has become, then the latest "double tap" scandal, will no doubt be no different. Again, you have to wonder if Repubs, have learnt anything from any one of his many previous blunders?
But really, who needs military enemies and foes, like Russia and China, when you've got incompetent idiots like Hegseth, ruining, corrupting and turning the USA Military into a national joke.
[U]The Quintessential MAGA DEI Hire![/U]
Pete [NOPARSE]"Double Tap" Hegseth, will remain the ultimate, CLASSIC prime example, of the inept white male privileged MAGA DEI hire, failing upwards and just the most hilarious government MAGA DEI hire, ever!
Only in the QAnon/MAGA/Repub party can you FAIL [/NOPARSE]upwards![/QUOTE]You really think anyone with half a brain cares they killed two narco terrorists smuggling in drugs which will kill hundreds or even thousands of Americans? People really need to stop just trying to win elections and focus on protecting Americans, not even Americcans, just protecting humans from deadly drugs in general.
-
3 photos
MAGA is so bad, they don't want a record of it
[QUOTE=EnterTheV;3041296]Trump and his trash administration are a complete Joke! The economy is the worse it has ever been and now wants war with Venezuela all his policies have failed dude is a complete Loser.[/QUOTE]Totally understand your strong frustration with the current inept administration, and their bad domestic and foreign policies, not too mention a disastrous economic and jobs record. It's so bad, the MAGA Fuhrer and his cronies, don't even want to report the [NOPARSE]numbers of how bad it is.
Just look at the recent approval ratings, where Americans have the president, the party, the economy ...etc,[/NOPARSE] [B]at all-time historical lows![/B]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3041405]Totally understand your strong frustration with the current inept administration, and their bad domestic and foreign policies, not too mention a disastrous economic and jobs record. It's so bad, the MAGA Fuhrer and his cronies, don't even want to report the [NOPARSE]numbers of how bad it is.
Just look at the recent approval ratings, where Americans have the president, the party, the economy ...etc,[/NOPARSE] [B]at all-time historical lows![/B][/QUOTE]My take of approval ratings, only shows that 30-36% of Americans are biased uneducated idiots.
-
Apparently 64% of Americans care enough and want due process!
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3041401]You really think anyone with half a brain cares they killed two narco terrorists smuggling in drugs which will kill hundreds or even thousands of Americans? People really need to stop just trying to win elections and focus on protecting Americans, not even Americcans, just protecting humans from deadly drugs in general.[/QUOTE]I guess that would be the half-witted, half-brain gullible MAGA Americans, that favor dictators and authoritarian rule of law and don't wish to see [B]due process[/B].
[B]Trumps boat strikes appear quite unpopular, as Americans again support due process,[/B] Nov 14,2025 [URL]https://edition.cnn.com/2025/11/14/politics/boat-strikes-trump-due-process-polling[/URL] Most Americans (approx. 64%) do not approve, of the boat strikes, especially the illegal practice of criminal "double tap" war crime strikes.
As always, yet another baseless opinion. Most Americans want the rule of law to be obeyed, facts, evidence and due process, and NOT the lying words of a wannabe dictator or corrupt admin.
[U]MAGA's Hilarious Idea of "Protecting" Americans:[/U]
And don't make me laugh, especially about protecting Americans from deadly drugs and drug traffickers. [NOPARSE]But I guess you didn't get the memo? ... The one where your [/NOPARSE]MAGA Fuhrer, [B]pardoned yet another drug criminal[/B] who poisoned, dumped, drugged and killed Americans with 500 tons of cocaine.
Your MAGA Fuhrer's hypocrisy on street-level drug dealers and foot-soldiers boat strikes to "protect" Americans, while pardoning drug kingpins, is hilarious and only serves as pure political cannon fodder for you MAGA suckers, that want to believe those boat strikes are even about protecting Americans from drugs, when fentanyl (killing most Americans) isn't primarily produced out of the Caribbean.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3041400]China is [NOPARSE]quietly destroying, any long-term Western LNG/Hydrogen/Diesel ambitions, of being a major supplier to the Global South, for fueling and supplying heavy & light duty trucks, as new energy and electric Heavy & Light duty truck sales [/NOPARSE]surge.
Sales of new energy heavy trucks in China surged by 175% (yoy) in the first half of 2025, reaching around 76,100 units and capturing a significant portion (about 22-25%) of the new heavy truck sales market, with analysts estimating, sales may reach as much as 60% by early 2026. [URL]https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/soaring-electric-truck-sales-deal-new-blow-diesel-use-china-2025-07-11/[/URL].
[B]Los Angeles Times China's diesel trucks are shifting to electric,[/B] Nov 27,2025. [URL]https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2025-11-27/chinas-diesel-trucks-are-shifting-to-electric-that-could-change-global-lng-diesel-demand[/URL]..[/QUOTE]Sigh! Man, you still do not get it. First off, Bill Gates has just backed off the global warming climate change fiasco. Now that the silicon valley companies need massive power with their AI ventures, it is amazing how the end of the world gloom and doom climate change crap is off the table. Only Algore is still singing that song. Well, Algore and you.
The funny part is that I was looking at a RV and the manufacturer was like "Only set the temperature 20 degrees lower than it is outside or your pipes will freeze". I was like WTF? Oh no, I am going to figure out how to put in a system where I can get 65 degrees inside when it is 100 outside. So I needed not one but two AC units. RV manufacturers now let you put in up to 4 batteries in the typical well for batteries. The most powerful batteries that fit the slot are 12 volts 165 ah. That will run one AC all night. It can be charged via an alternator so just running the RV will charge the battery with a generator as a back up.
With the second AC, to run this on electricity, I would buy a power station, hook up solar panels to it, and give it two added batteries. The RVs I was looking at have a weight carrying capacity between 600 and 2000 pounds. Here is the funny part. The six batteries and the power station weigh about a 1,000 pounds. The cost for this setup is about $10,000 as well. Even with that, I still need to plug into shore power, which is electricity produced mostly with fossil fuels, and have a generator as back up.
Or I can buy a 5500 watt generator that weighs 200 pounds and burn $5 of fuel per night. In this case, alternative energy makes no sense.
I think it is hilarious that people use the term "off grid" in the RV world. First off, the electric RV is not really a thing because of the battery weight. Being "off grid" means you are using diesel or gasoline to drive to where you are going and the term "off grid" does not refer to using a fossil fuel generator although I see no reason why it matters. I can just see some hipster saying, "I use diesel for driving not power. For that I use the sun. " So what? You are burning a helluva more fuel carrying around a 1,000 pounds in batteries.
The only reason battery powered cars make sense then is because of how heavy the engines are. What makes much more sense is the use of solar power and batteries in a stationary environment.
It is not like there are not applications. China using solar to charge batteries and have cars come in and getting a battery change over 5 minutes versus charging up for an hour makes a helluva lot of sense. If you recall, that idiot Biden wanted to spend billions on charging stations.
The good thing is there have been others disgusted with living with 80 degree inside temps in a RV and there has been an explosion of new AC units. This was a fascinating video on which ACs are available and how much energy they use. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CXCWdxj22Q[/URL]
It is going to be interesting to see if one voltage wins out, if solar will be incorporated into AC on an individual basis. When you start talking power costs like Europe is paying, having a power station with solar and a portable AC unit makes a lot of sense. The applications are endless.
Biden had dementia and stage 4 prostate cancer. Harris was a fucking idiot who could not even financially manage her campaign. She would have been a disaster financially managing the country. Your green electric programs led to California's train to nowhere and the moronic billion dollar charging stations that were never built and are not necessary.
But what about Trump and MAGA? What about them? The answer to your party being stupid is pointing a finger at the other party and saying we are better than them? That is pathetic. It means you do not own your own fuckups.
And I will say this. Now that electricity generation is going to be the key to AI, you Democrats should be pretty damned grateful that there were so many of us Republicans who did not buy into your bullshit climate change theory like Europe did. Electricity is so costly in Europe that AI centers make no sense there. The race to win AI is going to be between China and the USA, the two nations that fought climate change bullshit. It is amazing to see how Europe checked themselves out of the race. Europe was so dumb. Oh, China, you want to build a billion coal plants, and we build none, that is fine with us.
Climate change was not an economic policy. It was a fucking religion. Still, the entire green revolution was not a bad thing. It is time though to check and see what makes economic sense and what does not and leave the patronizing bullshit behind.
-
[QUOTE=Mosquito2002;3041417]My take of approval ratings, only shows that 30-36% of Americans are biased uneducated idiots.[/QUOTE]Oh brother. If you are a stock broker and your income is based on market gains, Trump has been a Godsend. If you are overweight without insurance and could not afford the $1000 a month for weight loss treatment but can handle paying the $300 Trump got in negotiations with drug companies, Trump has been a Godsend. If you live in Ukraine, you have seen Trump negotiating like crazy to bring peace to a region whereas Biden did not talk to anyone. Under Trump, there are finally reviews being done on vaccines to see if they do any fucking good at all. So being a child under Trump may mean better health for children. Just recently the incredibly stupid Hepatitis be vaccine being given to newborns was voted against.
But what about Hegseth, ETC ETC? What about them? It is fine for you to not like Trump and say he is not your preferred choice for president. That is your opinion, but the problem with you Democrats is that you are so fucking arrogant you think everyone would be better off with a president Harris. It just shows me what arrogant assholes you Democrats really are. A lot of people have done well under Trump. You are just too arrogant and stupid to see that.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3041453]I guess that would be the half-witted, half-brain gullible MAGA Americans, that favor dictators and authoritarian rule of law and don't wish to see [B]due process[/B].
[B]Trumps boat strikes appear quite unpopular, as Americans again support due process,[/B] Nov 14,2025 [URL]https://edition.cnn.com/2025/11/14/politics/boat-strikes-trump-due-process-polling[/URL] Most Americans (approx. 64%) do not approve, of the boat strikes, especially the illegal practice of criminal "double tap" war crime strikes.
As always, yet another baseless opinion. Most Americans want the rule of law to be obeyed, facts, evidence and due process, and NOT the lying words of a wannabe dictator or corrupt admin.
[U]MAGA's Hilarious Idea of "Protecting" Americans:[/U]
And don't make me laugh, especially about protecting Americans from deadly drugs and drug traffickers. [NOPARSE]But I guess you didn't get the memo? ... The one where your [/NOPARSE]MAGA Fuhrer, [B]pardoned yet another drug criminal[/B] who poisoned, dumped, drugged and killed Americans with 500 tons of cocaine.
Your MAGA Fuhrer's hypocrisy on street-level drug dealers and foot-soldiers boat strikes to "protect" Americans, while pardoning drug kingpins, is hilarious and only serves as pure political cannon fodder for you MAGA suckers, that want to believe those boat strikes are even about protecting Americans from drugs, when fentanyl (killing most Americans) isn't primarily produced out of the Caribbean.[/QUOTE]Nope! No one with half a brain gives a shit. Its another kindergarten story time tale told by Dems with no truth to it what so ever. The only people who care are those afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome, like you. Same thing with this fairy tale Dems are trying to spin about a struggling economy LOL. Economy has been absolutely fine. Every measure is completely acceptable. Just because it didn't boom the way it did during his first term doesn't mean it's bad. But the real disgusting lie, is Dems are actually trying to compare it to 9% inflation Biden / Harris economy. Now that is a fucking joke. 9% inflation in one year is fucking insane, can only be achieved with mega liberal policies like steal from the middle class and give to the poor / those who won't work.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Realizing what it means to be an Electrostate!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041499]Sigh! Man, you still do not get it. First off, Bill Gates has just backed off the global warming climate change fiasco. Now that the silicon valley companies need massive power with their AI ventures, it is amazing how the end of the world gloom and doom climate change crap is off the table. Only Algore is still singing that song. Well, Algore and you.[/QUOTE][NOPARSE]First...Gates, Musk and others are not the first or the last, the spineless, billionaires, to blow like a leaf in the wind, and change their political views, given whatever prevailing new political winds blow in. BTW, Algore is making huge bank, investing in clean energy and environment friendly companies.[/NOPARSE]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041499]The funny part is that I was looking at a RV and the manufacturer was like "Only set the temperature 20 degrees lower than it is outside or your pipes will freeze". I was like WTF? ... [/QUOTE][NOPARSE]Second...that was a pretty good rant on RVs, ACs and how to keep warm in one. But sounds like a separate convo/debate. If you want to start a side-debate on how to best heat an RV in the electrical age, then set it up for a side debate...I'm [/NOPARSE]game!
Perhaps in the next post, you could kindly explain, WTF vaccines, RVs and ACs have to do with, or dovetail into the changing landscape of global businesses transitioning to more cost effective and efficient BEV trucks from traditional diesel trucks and by doing so, benefit from cost saving of ten of thousands of dollars in ROI?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041499]And I will say this. Now that electricity generation is going to be the key to AI, you Democrats should be pretty damned grateful that there were so many of us Republicans who did not buy into your bullshit climate change theory like Europe did. Electricity is so costly in Europe that AI centers make no sense there. The race to win AI is going to be between China and the USA, the two nations that fought climate change bullshit. It is amazing to see how Europe checked themselves out of the race. Europe was so dumb. Oh, China, you want to build a billion coal plants, and we build none, that is fine with us.[/QUOTE]Much [NOPARSE]of this rant, is pretty much just wholly inaccurate. Both China and Europe are further ahead at becoming electrostate, than the U.S. and therefore perhaps better equipped to handle future AI power needs.
"...and we build none", yeah that's just not even close. Under your dumbass MAGA 2.0 admin, it is actively promoting the coal industry by opening federal lands for coal mining and providing financial support to modernize coal-fired power plants.
It's funny how the cost of electricity was one of the primary issues at the ballot box in the Dems the Big Blue Wave win in the 2025 Nov Elections. So tell me Elvis 2008, who do you think is paying for the current power (and water) needs of AI, data centers and crypto? Also, how do you think the U.S. is going to manage the fast growing power need of AI? Meaning where is the excess power going to be generated from, especially under the current clown shit-show MAGA admin? Is it nuclear? Is it "Drill Baby Drill"? Or just [/NOPARSE]out of thin air?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041499]Climate change was not an economic policy. It was a fucking religion. Still, the entire green revolution was not a bad thing. It is time though to check and see what makes economic sense and what does not and leave the patronizing bullshit behind.[/QUOTE]That's exactly [NOPARSE]what BEV trucks and clean energy systems do,...make economic sense. Pepsi, DHL, Walmart, and increased yoy sales of BEV trucks in Europe and China for example, are proving that over and over [/NOPARSE]again.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041499]It is going to be interesting to see if one voltage wins out, if solar will be incorporated into AC on an individual basis. When you start talking power costs like Europe is paying, having a power station with solar and a portable AC unit makes a lot of sense. The applications are endless.[/QUOTE][NOPARSE]Third...I've no idea what the hell "...if one voltage wins out" means. But Europe is much further along in electrification and clean energy than you might think, compared with the U.S.
And yes, if by "The applications are endless", you mean creating and storing your own power from solar/batteries (which your dumbass MAGA Fuhrer is trying to shutdown) and electrifying everything, so that countries, states, or individuals have the means to be self-sufficient and self-reliant (and not depend on gov't...something you should understand), then[/NOPARSE] [B]congratulations...you are [u]finally[/u] catching on,[/B] to what it means to be an electrostate.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041501]Oh brother. If you are a stock broker and your income is based on market gains, Trump has been a Godsend. If you are overweight without insurance and could not afford the $1000 a month for weight loss treatment but can handle paying the $300 Trump got in negotiations with drug companies, Trump has been a Godsend. If you live in Ukraine, you have seen Trump negotiating like crazy to bring peace to a region whereas Biden did not talk to anyone. Under Trump, there are finally reviews being done on vaccines to see if they do any fucking good at all. So being a child under Trump may mean better health for children. Just recently the incredibly stupid Hepatitis be vaccine being given to newborns was voted against.
But what about Hegseth, ETC ETC? What about them? It is fine for you to not like Trump and say he is not your preferred choice for president. That is your opinion, but the problem with you Democrats is that you are so fucking arrogant you think everyone would be better off with a president Harris. It just shows me what arrogant assholes you Democrats really are. A lot of people have done well under Trump. You are just too arrogant and stupid to see that.[/QUOTE]From Hawaii, so by proxy I'm a Democrat. Fact being, I'm not a fan of Harris or any of the top democrats in Congress.
Yea, a lot of millionaires, large corporations and billionaire have done well under this administration. However for the average working American this administration has been hell.
Got to love you vaccine deniers. Won't get into name calling, but you should really do some medical research fact checking.
Also, admire your tunnel vision in your praises of Trump. Again, highly recommend you do some fact checking on who really benefits from Trump's so call accomplishments. It's definitely not the majority of Americans. Yea Yea, if you're a stock trader you're making bank and 401's are profiting. But our National Debt is also skyrocketing.
Lastly, if everything is so great. Why the fuck is the administration hiding both the jobs and inflation reports? Odds of a recession in 2026 at 30-40% BTW.
-
[QUOTE=Mosquito2002;3041580]From Hawaii, so by proxy I'm a Democrat. Fact being, I'm not a fan of Harris or any of the top democrats in Congress.
Yea, a lot of millionaires, large corporations and billionaire have done well under this administration. However for the average working American this administration has been hell.
Got to love you vaccine deniers. Won't get into name calling, but you should really do some medical research fact checking.
Also, admire your tunnel vision in your praises of Trump. Again, highly recommend you do some fact checking on who really benefits from Trump's so call accomplishments. It's definitely not the majority of Americans. Yea Yea, if you're a stock trader you're making bank and 401's are profiting. But our National Debt is also skyrocketing.
Lastly, if everything is so great. Why the fuck is the administration hiding both the jobs and inflation reports? Odds of a recession in 2026 at 30-40% BTW.[/QUOTE]Almost forgot. How about that 12 Billion Farmers Bailout, nothing like spending taxpayers dollars to fix a problem you caused.
Now awaiting for the tab for all the lawsuits that have been or will be filed against this administration over immigration enforcement, especially those that violated court orders and the Constitution.
Yup, it'll be the American Taxpayer that'll foot the bill for these. So, it's all good in Trump land.
-
The JIG is up, even says the #1 Global Warming conster
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041499]Sigh! Man, you still do not get it. First off, Bill Gates has just backed off the global warming climate change fiasco. Now that the silicon valley companies need massive power with their AI ventures, it is amazing how the end of the world gloom and doom climate change crap is off the table. Only Algore is still singing that song. Well, Algore and you.
The funny part is that I was looking at a RV and the manufacturer was like "Only set the temperature 20 degrees lower than it is outside or your pipes will freeze". I was like WTF? Oh no, I am going to figure out how to put in a system where I can get 65 degrees inside when it is 100 outside. So I needed not one but two AC units. RV manufacturers now let you put in up to 4 batteries in the typical well for batteries. The most powerful batteries that fit the slot are 12 volts 165 ah. That will run one AC all night. It can be charged via an alternator so just running the RV will charge the battery with a generator as a back up.
With the second AC, to run this on electricity, I would buy a power station, hook up solar panels to it, and give it two added batteries. The RVs I was looking at have a weight carrying capacity between 600 and 2000 pounds. Here is the funny part. The six batteries and the power station weigh about a 1,000 pounds. The cost for this setup is about $10,000 as well. Even with that, I still need to plug into shore power, which is electricity produced mostly with fossil fuels, and have a generator as back up.
Or I can buy a 5500 watt generator that weighs 200 pounds and burn $5 of fuel per night. In this case, alternative energy makes no sense...[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/03/business/economy/study-climate-damage-retracted.html[/URL]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRaN3-_HFDo[/URL]
My Industry has a lot of overlap with the scam known as "Global Warming".
I've been saying for 40 yrs that its a Wall St / CCP hoax, American manufacturing bad, send it all to CCPland.
Does anyone remember the 1970's when the covers of many major magazines were warning of the upcoming ICE AGE any day now.
And then the CCP opened to market reforms and BOOM Overnite Oh Shit Global Warming is going to destroy us all.
China officially opened its doors to market reforms in 1978, a pivotal year marked by Deng Xiaoping's leadership initiating the "Reform and Opening-up" (25913;38761;24320;25918 policy to transition from a centrally planned economy towards a market-oriented system, focusing on agriculture, industry, science, and defense. This era saw the establishment of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) like Shenzhen (1980) and policies encouraging private enterprise, leading to rapid economic growth and poverty reduction.
[URL]https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/today-its-global-warming-in-the-70s-it-was-the-coming-ice-age[/URL]
-
That's a whole lot of criminal charges, for not giving a shit!
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3041572]Nope! No one with half a brain gives a shit. [/QUOTE]You're wrong again, as usual, with your baseless claims!
Apparently not, since your Sec. Def. MAGA idiot, lapdog and sycophant, Pete Hegseth, could be facing multiple criminal and war crimes charges. That's a heck of a lot a shit, to be charge with, for something nobody supposedly doesn't give a shit about. BTW, I'm pretty sure those lawmakers, looking to investigate and make any criminal charges, have wayyyyy more than half-a-brain.
[B]Former JAGs say Hegseth, others may have committed war crimes,[/B] Dec 1, 2025 [URL]https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2025/12/01/former-jags-say-hegseth-others-may-have-committed-war-crimes/[/URL].
I wonder what the Vegas odds are for when your MAGA Fuhrer throws Hegseth under the bus? [I](...kkkk!)[/I] A week from now? A Month? Three Months?
-
The two time (2 x) bailouts of red state farmers, is RIGHT-WING socialism!
[QUOTE=Mosquito2002;3041582]Almost forgot. How about that 12 Billion Farmers Bailout, nothing like spending taxpayers dollars to fix a problem you caused.[/QUOTE]Yep, all [NOPARSE]those failed economic policies, leading up to the horrific farmer bailouts (2x now) and handouts (2x now), by the MAGA Fuhrer's and his clown shit-show admin, is once again looking a lot like, right-wing [/NOPARSE]socialism, to the tune of 40 billion ($28 bn 1st term and now $12 bn).
-
Scumbags
Trump and his Criminals just stole Oil from Venezuela!
-
3 photos
No, nobody remembers that because it didn't really happen
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3041600][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/03/business/economy/study-climate-damage-retracted.html[/URL]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRaN3-_HFDo[/URL]
My Industry has a lot of overlap with the scam known as "Global Warming".
I've been saying for 40 yrs that its a Wall St / CCP hoax, American manufacturing bad, send it all to CCPland.
[B]Does anyone remember the 1970's when the covers of many major magazines were warning of the upcoming ICE AGE any day now.[/b]
And then the CCP opened to market reforms and BOOM Overnite Oh Shit Global Warming is going to destroy us all.
China officially opened its doors to market reforms in 1978, a pivotal year marked by Deng Xiaoping's leadership initiating the "Reform and Opening-up" (25913;38761;24320;25918 policy to transition from a centrally planned economy towards a market-oriented system, focusing on agriculture, industry, science, and defense. This era saw the establishment of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) like Shenzhen (1980) and policies encouraging private enterprise, leading to rapid economic growth and poverty reduction.
[URL]https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/today-its-global-warming-in-the-70s-it-was-the-coming-ice-age[/URL][/QUOTE]Winger bullshitters have been reminding us of that supposed "trend" among scientists in the 1970's that never happened for decades though.
As your NYT article accurately characterized such proclamations; they were "outliers". And there was no such consensus among scientists. It was only that the typically pro Repub Mainstream Media tried to suggest there was. Not surprisingly. Your other links say as much:
[B]Cruz on the Global Cooling Myth and Galileo.[/B]
[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2015/03/cruz-on-the-global-cooling-myth-and-galileo/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Sen. Ted Cruz cited a 1975 Newsweek article on global cooling to question the evidence of global warming, and in the process made several incorrect and unsubstantiated claims.
..........
The article in question was a single-page story published on April 28, 1975, by journalist Peter Gwynne. It did indeed paint an ominous picture of a cooling world, with particular concern regarding reductions to crop yields with cooler temperatures. The article, however, was criticized decades later, in May 2014, by its author.
..........
The survey of the peer-reviewed literature between 1965 and 1979 found only seven papers indicating global cooling compared with 44 papers indicating warming (see chart).[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Mosquito2002;3041580]However for the average working American this administration has been hell. Yea Yea, if you're a stock trader you're making bank and 401's are profiting. Odds of a recession in 2026 at 30-40% BTW.[/QUOTE]About 60% of American workers have retirement accounts so I do not get how the average worker has been going through hell. And if the average working is in hell right now, what do you call it if there is a recession? Worse than hell? Is there even such a thing? That is what I mean about Democratic arrogance and hyperbole.
[QUOTE=Mosquito2002;3041580]Lastly, if everything is so great[/QUOTE]I did not say everything was great.
[QUOTE=Mosquito2002;3041580]Got to love you vaccine deniers.[/QUOTE]Well, vaccines do produce an immune response. The theory of vaccines and with all but two of them it is just theory that boosting the immune system versus some diseases has more benefits than risks. I am a vaccine agnostic then and I am skeptical of anyone who claims to know otherwise. If you are a vaccine believer then, it is NOT based on science.
The crazy part with hepatitis be though is that the virus is spread the same way AIDS is. Is there a problem then with infants shooting up heroin and engaging in anal sex? Uh no, and that means that you do not know if the vaccine really works for decades, but it can do harm. It seems to me that a more targeted approach with at risk adults would make a whole lot more sense than blasting every infant with it.
-
You forgot something
[QUOTE=Spidy;3041651]Yep, all [NOPARSE]those failed economic policies, leading up to the horrific farmer bailouts (2x now) and handouts (2x now), by the MAGA Fuhrer's and his clown shit-show admin, is once again looking a lot like, right-wing [/NOPARSE]socialism, to the tune of 40 billion ($28 bn 1st term and now $12 bn).[/QUOTE]What about the bailout of Argentina to the tune of $20 billion dollars? It would be non starter for the federal government to bail out a state (where Americans live) but it's okay to undercut Americans in agriculture and farming?
-
More Bullshit lies from Tokyo Rose
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3041676]Winger bullshitters have been reminding us of that supposed "trend" among scientists in the 1970's that never happened for decades though.
As your NYT article accurately characterized such proclamations; they were "outliers". And there was no such consensus among scientists. It was only that the typically pro Repub Mainstream Media tried to suggest there was. Not surprisingly. Your other links say as much:
[B]Cruz on the Global Cooling Myth and Galileo.[/B]
[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2015/03/cruz-on-the-global-cooling-myth-and-galileo/[/URL][/QUOTE]I remember the magazine covers I even did a school paper, I don't remember the magazine I used either Time or Newsweek.
More bullshit revisionist lies from the NYT and you.
Outliers my ass!! No surprise, you're a pathological LIAR on every single issue.
They are slowly trying to change the fucking narrative like they do with everything!!
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/border/2025/12/11/ice-sweep-in-sanctuary-california-10000-criminal-aliens-arrested-including-14%e2%80%91conviction-repeat-offender/[/URL]
They deserve them.
Our Lord and Savior should scoop them all up all over the country and deport them to LA county instead of Latin America they certainly don't want them back.
They refer to them as "yesterdays trash".
Only problem I see, is that they would cheat the US Census and count them when they apportion house seats.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3041648]You're wrong again, as usual, with your baseless claims!
Apparently not, since your Sec. Def. MAGA idiot, lapdog and sycophant, Pete Hegseth, could be facing multiple criminal and war crimes charges. That's a heck of a lot a shit, to be charge with, for something nobody supposedly doesn't give a shit about. BTW, I'm pretty sure those lawmakers, looking to investigate and make any criminal charges, have wayyyyy more than half-a-brain.
[B]Former JAGs say Hegseth, others may have committed war crimes,[/B] Dec 1, 2025 [URL]https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2025/12/01/former-jags-say-hegseth-others-may-have-committed-war-crimes/[/URL].
I wonder what the Vegas odds are for when your MAGA Fuhrer throws Hegseth under the bus? [I](...kkkk!)[/I] A week from now? A Month? Three Months?[/QUOTE]LOL, A whole of charges from the same group of people who falsely impeached Trump twice and made him America's ultimate anti-hero. It's the same divisive shit. War charges for killing narco terrorists who are illegally smuggling in deadly poison which will kill hundreds, maybe thousands of Americans is a total waste of time and further divides the country. Hegseth did nothing wrong in my eyes, but I will admit he doesn't appear to be hardened enough for the job and I am kind of disappointed in him. He doesn't seem like he takes the heat well, unlike Trump who is never phased from the bullshit attacks. Hegseth does need to toughen up if he wants to run that position properly.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3041676]Winger bullshitters have been reminding us of that supposed "trend" among scientists in the 1970's that never happened for decades though.
As your NYT article accurately characterized such proclamations; they were "outliers". And there was no such consensus among scientists.[/QUOTE]This is what is so maddening about you Democrats. Your arrogance is rooted in your bullshit explanations for your fuckups.
This is what I mean. Anyone should be able to see the scientific method at work. Here is the theory. Here is the data. Does it prove the theory or not? Status of the scientist should not matter.
The fact is both Time and Newsweek had the earth surrounded in an ice cube. The earth was getting colder. The winters in the 1970's were brutal. And the stories were the same. The cooling was man's fault and cue the scientists who say it is the fault of man.
Thing is CO2 levels were only able to be measured since 1955, and they were going up as we had this cooling. Then AlGore comes along twenty years later and now man is causing global warming, and rising CO2 levels are to blame, and it is the same doom and gloom we are all going to die bullshit unless we "do something".
And global warming slows down and the name is changed to climate change and now people are laughing off the entire concept of climate change.
The theory did not change. The money being spent on the theory has dried up because no one wants to talk about it anymore. Energy companies have been mostly Republican and it was fine to beat the snot out of them but when the silicon valley guys, the money arm of the Dems, was going to get beat up because of a lack of electricity driving AI growth, this theory was finally thrown on the trash heap where it belongs. The data NEVER matched the theory, and anyone with a brain could see it.
And now there is the consensus bullshit again. Science is data. Consensus is poltical. And the notion of God being mad at you and that is why there is no rain for your crops is the oldest fucking con there is. You Democrats fell for the con hook, line, and sinker just like you did with Covid. Instead of it being a bunch of swindlers driving into town with a carnival, it was con men with PHD behind their names sucking up to the pols and Hollywood elite. "You all are so special. You really understand how climate change works unlike those dumb Republicans. "
It is so funny how anyone who says Trump is not pure evil is accused of loving him so much. Trump fucked up the pandemic response. Bush let banks get away with murder, and the war in Iraq was a disaster. But with you guys and Biden? Oh, he was great. Kamala Harris was perfect. She would have been way better than Trump.
That is what gets me with Democrats. You are so arrogant and patronizing when time after time you have been so stupid and made these horrific fuckups. The trillion dollar climate change fuckup is melting away in our eyes, and the only thing you can say, "Can you believe Trump called a reporter Piggy? Man, those MAGA guys are dumb. "
-
What is braggadocios Pete, hiding with the 22nd strike?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3041748]LOL, A whole of charges from the same group of people who falsely impeached Trump twice and made him America's ultimate anti-hero. It's the same divisive shit. War charges for killing narco terrorists who are illegally smuggling in deadly poison which will kill hundreds, maybe thousands of Americans is a total waste of time and further divides the country. Hegseth did nothing wrong in my eyes, but I will admit he doesn't appear to be hardened enough for the job and I am kind of disappointed in him. He doesn't seem like he takes the heat well, unlike Trump who is never phased from the bullshit attacks. Hegseth does need to toughen up if he wants to run that position properly.[/QUOTE]Your [U]unfounded opinions[/U] aside, here are some REAL FACTS about your beloved Pete Hegseth:
Pete [B]"Double Tap"[/B] Hegseth, is a known and complete fuckup! [NOPARSE]He's a known drunk (who now claims to have stopped), and was arrested for sexual assault and then paid $50K NDA, to the women who accused him of a 2017 sexual assault, to make this "nuisance" suit quietly go away. But even his own mother called him "an abuser of women". And this is just the tip of the iceberg, as I could go on!
Wisely, Americans have grown to realize that unless they see real evidence and facts from this MAGA 2.0 shit-show admin, then don't believe a fucking word that come out of it's lying corrupt mouth or press releases. Hegseth, Bondi and Patel, are like the 3-Stooges,...all very comical and all very idiotically[/NOPARSE] entertaining.
Let's see what a congressional or other investigations uncover, because it's very suspicious, how the dude [B]proudly releases[/B] Notice how the idiot Hegseth, proudly flaunts the release of the previous first 21 strikes, which are of course used as public relations tools, for you MAGA dolts and suckers, to think the administration is doing "real work" against drug trafficking.
But the fact remains, [B]anyone with half-brain[/B], would ask themselves, why isn't [B]braggadocios Pete[/B] proudly flaunting the 22nd strike video? Why is it being withheld? It is perhaps no doubt due to its content, which shows a legally and ethically questionable "double-tap" war crime strike on survivors?
BTW, RamDavidson84, notice a common MAGA [U]lawless theme[/U] here? Something all too familiar, about MAGA politicians not releasing evidence to [NOPARSE]Americans?
That'S RIGHT...just like your MAGA Fuhrer's guilty conscience, with not releasing the Epstein Pedo Sex Files (EPSF), I suspect Hegseth must be going through the very same angst...ya[/NOPARSE] think?
-
3 photos
Uh
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3041742]I remember the magazine covers I even did a school paper, I don't remember the magazine I used either Time or Newsweek.
[B]More bullshit revisionist lies from the NYT and you.
Outliers my ass!![/b] No surprise, you're a pathological LIAR on every single issue.
They are slowly trying to change the fucking narrative like they do with everything!!
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/border/2025/12/11/ice-sweep-in-sanctuary-california-10000-criminal-aliens-arrested-including-14%e2%80%91conviction-repeat-offender/[/URL]
They deserve them.
Our Lord and Savior should scoop them all up all over the country and deport them to LA county instead of Latin America they certainly don't want them back.
They refer to them as "yesterdays trash".
Only problem I see, is that they would cheat the US Census and count them when they apportion house seats.[/QUOTE]The headline in your linked NYT article, presumably posted by you to "prove" your contention:
[B]Top Journal Retracts Study Predicting Catastrophic Climate Toll.
While growing evidence shows that carbon emissions are harming the economy, the journal Nature found that an outlier paper had deep flaws.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/03/business/economy/study-climate-damage-retracted.html[/URL]
Since almost nobody without a NYT subscription can read your linked article after that headline, was the "outlier" paper with deep flaws the one joining everyone else on the carbon emissions / global climate change conclusion or the rare one that argued against it?
-
You are dead wrong!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3041770]Your [U]unfounded opinions[/U] aside, here are some REAL FACTS about your beloved Pete Hegseth:
Pete [B]"Double Tap"[/B] Hegseth, is a known and complete fuckup! [NOPARSE]He's a known drunk (who now claims to have stopped), and was arrested for sexual assault and then paid $50K NDA, to the women who accused him of a 2017 sexual assault, to make this "nuisance" suit quietly go away. But even his own mother called him "an abuser of women". And this is just the tip of the iceberg, as I could go on!
Wisely, Americans have grown to realize that unless they see real evidence and facts from this MAGA 2.0 shit-show admin, then don't believe a fucking word that come out of it's lying corrupt mouth or press releases. Hegseth, Bondi and Patel, are like the 3-Stooges,...all very comical and all very idiotically[/NOPARSE] entertaining.
Let's see what a congressional or other investigations uncover, because it's very suspicious, how the dude [B]proudly releases[/B] Notice how the idiot Hegseth, proudly flaunts the release of the previous first 21 strikes, which are of course used as public relations tools, for you MAGA dolts and suckers, to think the administration is doing "real work" against drug trafficking.[/QUOTE]Pete Hegseth had to make a second strike on the "combatants" because they were still dangerous. They could ham swam thousands of miles across the Atlantic and attacked America! LOL.
-
2 photos
More Epstein Pics!
And Chump further exposed!
-
Marjorie "Traitor" Green
Traitor to America is right! And this traitor finally comes clean and fesses up to what those of us with any rational sense have known from the beginning. MAGA is nothing more than a bunch of divisive, dangerous, hateful, angry, bullshit lies. The thing is that supporters of MAGA know this but don't care! They like the fact that Chump is who he is, because they see their loser selves in him, and their anger at America is soothed by the fact that he has the power, and through him they can "break" things. Break the system that they feel screws them over. Break everything with their hate! Thanks Marjorie "Traitor" Green. You're still a hateful piece of shit yourself, but you demonstrate there is hope for your redemption:
[URL]https://youtu.be/M_qy4tb_F54?si=UdlLM9XRGcMdu6lL[/URL]
-
Presumably? WOW WTF no that's not what I did
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3041788]The headline in your linked NYT article, presumably posted by you to "prove" your contention:
[B]Top Journal Retracts Study Predicting Catastrophic Climate Toll.
While growing evidence shows that carbon emissions are harming the economy, the journal Nature found that an outlier paper had deep flaws.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/03/business/economy/study-climate-damage-retracted.html[/URL]
Since almost nobody without a NYT subscription can read your linked article after that headline, was the "outlier" paper with deep flaws the one joining everyone else on the carbon emissions / global climate change conclusion or the rare one that argued against it?[/QUOTE]But I have better things to do, than to combat your nonsensical lies for 2 days.
-
More left wing BS
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/12/health/medical-cannabis-benefits.html[/URL]
-
Lies lies lies cheating cheating cheating fraud fraud fraud
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/rep-mcclain-obamacare-aca/2025/12/12/id/1238108/[/URL]
[URL]https://x.com/amuse/status/1928197594146295818[/URL]
The Democratic party aka Bangkok Bob on steroids.
[URL]https://www.google.com/search?q=250[/URL]+billion+ppp+fraud&rlz=1 CAKPLI_enUS1143 US1143&oq=250+billion+ppp+fraud&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCTEwNTU5 ajBqNKgCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8.
-
Democrats aka liars cheaters fraudsters
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3041788]The headline in your linked NYT article, presumably posted by you to "prove" your contention:
[B]Top Journal Retracts Study Predicting Catastrophic Climate Toll.
While growing evidence shows that carbon emissions are harming the economy, the journal Nature found that an outlier paper had deep flaws.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/03/business/economy/study-climate-damage-retracted.html[/URL]
Since almost nobody without a NYT subscription can read your linked article after that headline, was the "outlier" paper with deep flaws the one joining everyone else on the carbon emissions / global climate change conclusion or the rare one that argued against it?[/QUOTE]The DNC and the EPA aka the American political arms of the CCP.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/newsoms-national-model-homeless-wracked-fraud[/URL]
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ex-ny-aide-did-chinas-bidding-get-rich-prosecutor-says-closing-arguments[/URL]
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/leaked-video-woke-elite-college-held-disgusting-sexual-orientation-performance[/URL]
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/social-justice-gone-wild-oklahoma-blm-leader-indicted-fraud-money-laundering-charges[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3041770]Your [U]unfounded opinions[/U] aside, here are some REAL FACTS about your beloved Pete Hegseth:
Pete [B]"Double Tap"[/B] Hegseth, is a known and complete fuckup! [NOPARSE]He's a known drunk (who now claims to have stopped), and was arrested for sexual assault and then paid $50K NDA, to the women who accused him of a 2017 sexual assault, to make this "nuisance" suit quietly go away. But even his own mother called him "an abuser of women". And this is just the tip of the iceberg, as I could go on!
Wisely, Americans have grown to realize that unless they see real evidence and facts from this MAGA 2.0 shit-show admin, then don't believe a fucking word that come out of it's lying corrupt mouth or press releases. Hegseth, Bondi and Patel, are like the 3-Stooges,...all very comical and all very idiotically[/NOPARSE] entertaining.
Let's see what a congressional or other investigations uncover, because it's very suspicious, how the dude [B]proudly releases[/B] Notice how the idiot Hegseth, proudly flaunts the release of the previous first 21 strikes, which are of course used as public relations tools, for you MAGA dolts and suckers, to think the administration is doing "real work" against drug trafficking.[/QUOTE]Double Tap is a bad ass nickname. I wish I could get a cool nickname like that. Honestly, Its all stupid irrelevant shit you are crying about. As I have already stated, only people with TDS really care about that stuff. I could care less if Cash Patel and Hegseth are trying to get some pussy on the side. Could care less if Hegseth drinks and parties too much, so did Ulysses S. Grant and he saved the Union in Civil War. Would I prefer a squeaky clean government under Trump, absolutely. But do I and the American people really care about this inconsequential shit. Nope. So many more real issues to focus on. Securing border, removing dangerous illegals, securing trade deals, keeping stock and real estate market strong, tough on crime, fighting cartels, fighting inflation. Those are the things that really matter. Dems just have nothing else to report so they blow this stuff way out of proportion and the TDS crowd buys right into it like the sheep they are.
How is the White House ballroom renovation going? Did we plan a race riot protest to stop wasting money on the White House remodel LOL? Every American can receive a one penny tax credit with the money saved hahaha.
-
Lies lies lies scams scams scams fraud fraud fraud cheating cheating cheating
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3041788]The headline in your linked NYT article, presumably posted by you to "prove" your contention:
[B]Top Journal Retracts Study Predicting Catastrophic Climate Toll.
While growing evidence shows that carbon emissions are harming the economy, the journal Nature found that an outlier paper had deep flaws.[/B]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/03/business/economy/study-climate-damage-retracted.html[/URL]
Since almost nobody without a NYT subscription can read your linked article after that headline, was the "outlier" paper with deep flaws the one joining everyone else on the carbon emissions / global climate change conclusion or the rare one that argued against it?[/QUOTE]December 1, 2025.
In 1862, in the midst of the Civil War, the Union government under Abraham Lincoln passed the Homestead Act, offering 160 acres of land, for free, to just about anyone, as long as you were willing to farm it.
For thousands of Norwegians, Swedes, and Germans facing poverty and land scarcity back in Europe, 160 acres of free land was an irresistible invitation.
Minnesota's vast prairies, dense forests, and endless lakes bore a striking resemblance to their native Scandinavian landscapes, and soon waves of settlers poured in, building farms, churches, and towns from the ground up.
Over time, they forged a deeply rooted culture—agrarian, devout, self-reliant, and fiercely community-oriented—that would shape the identity of the North Star State for generations.
Later waves of immigrants chose Minnesota for entirely different reasons.
In the early 1990's, Somalia collapsed into chaos after the fall of its government, and the US quickly found itself entangled.
President George H. W. Bush deployed American troops under the banner of humanitarian intervention. But after the infamous Black Hawk Down incident in 1993 in which 18 US service members were killed, President Clinton pulled the plug.
With Somalia descending even further into civil war, and the US eager to distance itself from direct military involvement, the Clinton administration came up with a new solution: asylum.
Tens of thousands of Somalis were granted refugee status, brought to America, and then placed in various cities across the country.
Some ended up in the South. Others landed in San Diego. But a small group—almost by accident—found their way to rural Minnesota, where meatpacking plants offered something no other place did: immediate employment that didn't require English fluency.
These early Somali immigrants seized the opportunity. They moved to Minneapolis. And then started telling their friends.
As one immigrant later said, they "loudly blew the whistle" to urge fellow Somalis to come to Minnesota.
And word spread fast: the jobs were real, the welfare system was generous, and the community was growing. And that's how the Twin Cities—snow and all—became the unlikely capital of Somali America.
Today, Minnesota is home to an estimated 60,000-80,000 Somalis—the largest Somali population outside of Somalia itself.
And many have found that meatpacking is no longer their most promising opportunity.
Minnesota has gone out of its way to build a welfare machine so outrageous that it seems to have been designed for fraud.
Under Governor Tim Walz, Minnesota has become ground zero for the most staggering welfare fraud in the nation.
Programs were built around low barriers to entry and minimal oversight. And the results have been both predictable and catastrophic.
Take "Feeding Our Future", a nonprofit meant to provide food for impoverished kids. In 2019, they received $3.4 million in federal funding. But once COVID hit, the grift went into overdrive.
By 2021, Feeding Our Future pulled in nearly $200 million, supposedly serving millions of meals across Minnesota. The reality? Fake attendance rosters, falsified meal counts, and fabricated invoices.
The money was instead spent on luxury cars, real estate in Africa, and lavish lifestyles. Somalis were at the heart of this fraud.
Then there's the Housing Stabilization Services (HSS) program. Launched in 2020 with a $2. 6 million estimate, the program ballooned to $104 million by 2024.
Investigators uncovered that many of the "providers" were nothing more than fictitious storefronts, billing Medicaid for services never rendered. Federal authorities have stated outright that the "vast majority" of HSS payments were fraudulent.
Federally funded autism services were the next target. In just five years, autism-related claims in Minnesota exploded over 100 x from $3 million to nearly $400 million.
It turns out that many of these were fabricated diagnoses, providing an intricate system of kickbacks to parents who were willing to pretend that their children were autistic.
Many of these came from the Somali community, with one Somali-American woman alone accused of siphoning $14 million from the program.
Under Tim Walz's administration, at least 28 separate fraud scandals have emerged, with most of the large-scale rings being perpetrated by members of Minnesota's Somali community.
When government agencies or journalists raise red flags, they're often met with a predictable defense: accusations of racism and xenophobia; Feeding Our Future even sued the state for racial discrimination when scrutiny increased.
The tactic worked. Timid politicians, unwilling to risk alienating a key voting bloc, turned a blind eye.
But the worst part is where most of that money ended up.
In 2023, the Somali diaspora sent back $1. 7 billion to Somalia—more than the entire Somali government's budget.
And Al-Shabaab, Somalia's al-Qaida-linked terrorist group, takes a cut of every dollar remitted.
Investigators found that many of the senders were on public assistance themselves—meaning US taxpayers were indirectly funding a terror group that wants to destroy America.
The irony is that the US government has stacks of legislation—Bank Secrecy Act, PATRIOT Act, AML compliance, FinCEN regulations—all supposedly crafted to keep money out of the hands of terrorist and money launderers.
And yet, somehow, a network of welfare scammers in Minneapolis can funnel billions of taxpayer money overseas to fund a notorious terror group.
There are zero red flags, no meaningful enforcement, and absolutely no accountability.
You couldn't invent a dumber system if you tried.
To your freedom.
MDS.
-
3 photos
Not just MAGA. She is the perfect classic Repub.
[QUOTE=TheCane;3041827]Traitor to America is right! And this traitor finally comes clean and fesses up to what those of us with any rational sense have known from the beginning. MAGA is nothing more than a bunch of divisive, dangerous, hateful, angry, bullshit lies. The thing is that supporters of MAGA know this but don't care! They like the fact that Chump is who he is, because they see their loser selves in him, and their anger at America is soothed by the fact that he has the power, and through him they can "break" things. Break the system that they feel screws them over. Break everything with their hate! Thanks Marjorie "Traitor" Green. You're still a hateful piece of shit yourself, but you demonstrate there is hope for your redemption:
[URL]https://youtu.be/M_qy4tb_F54?si=UdlLM9XRGcMdu6lL[/URL][/QUOTE]Note that she doesn't want to run for re-election because she is so convinced her Repub Party will not have Majority Control Power starting January 2027.
Nothing about wanting to continue to represent her constituents, propose, suggest or contribute to any negotiations for better legislation to improve America's economy, the welfare of Americans, smarter use of American tax-payer dollars, nothing. Nope. If the election doesn't deliver her "power" to do anything she wants with no negotiations necessary, no compromise necessary, no actual "governing" involved or required and certainly no actual working for her government paycheck, then she has no interest in taking the job, thank you.
Note that she also isn't running for re-election because she can't think of one damn good reason her former lord and savior Trump SHOULDN'T be well and surely Impeached again and again for the severe damage he has done to America and, therefore, does not want to be put in a position where she will have to lie her ass off to come up with a defense and excuse for him.
Nothing about being willing to take a stand AGAINST the severe damage he has done to America and for which she can offer zero defense or excuse in order to see that at least some form of justice is provided for America and to help prevent future scamming, lying, cheating, thieving, America-hating Repub con men from repeating Trump's transgressions.
Marjorie Taylor Greene is definitely the embodiment of the classic Repub now as always.
Still, she is light-years smarter and clearly better informed about the reality of her former lord and savior Trump than anyone here and elsewhere who continues to support him and believes his lies and con.
-
Murder by Pete 'Double-Tap' Hegseth? And MORE big wins by Dems!
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3041884]Double Tap is a bad ass nickname. I wish I could get a cool nickname like that. [/QUOTE]Yeah, I have no doubt, should he find himself jailed for murder and war crimes, the nickname [I]"Double Tap"[/I] will serve him well, in the jail prison showers.
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3041884]Honestly, ... Would I prefer a squeaky clean government under Trump, absolutely. But do I and the American people really care about this inconsequential shit. Nope.
[/QUOTE]Since when was MURDER inconsequential? Make no mistake about it, many lawmakers report the 22 strikes were MURDER! [B]The Legal Consequences of Pete Hegseths Kill Them All Order,[/B] December 1, 2025 [URL]https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/the-legal-consequences-of-pete-hegseths-kill-them-all-order[/URL]
Is it any wonder that Admiral Alvin Holsey, wanted no part of this murderous illegal strikes? He was right to retire, rather than be a patsy to Hegseth and company.
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3041884]So many more real issues to focus on. Securing border, removing dangerous illegals, securing trade deals, keeping stock and real estate market strong, tough on crime, fighting cartels, fighting inflation. Those are the things that really matter. Dems just have nothing else to report so they blow this stuff way out of proportion and the TDS crowd buys right into it like the sheep they are.[/QUOTE]Amidst the grifting, [NOPARSE]corruption, sympathizing with pedophiles and murder, are all pretty serious. But don't you worry, Americans are telling us, exactly what they think of your MAGA Fuhrer's failed policies...at the [/NOPARSE]BALLOT-BOX, in many districts, where your Fuhrer had double-digits wins in Nov 2024.
[U]MORE Big Wins for Dems:[/U]
On the heels of the recent Big Blue Wave 2025 Election wins, Dems have are still managing major wins in districts that where once ruby red, especially in Florida!
[B]Democrats end 30-year losing streak in Miami as Trump-backed candidate falls short,[/B] Dec, 9th 2025 [URL]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrats-end-30-year-losing-streak-miami-mayoral-race-trump-backed-candidate-falls-short[/URL]
[B]Democrat Rob Long wins big in Florida House race, defeating MAGA Republican[/B], Dec 10th 2025 [URL]https://www.sun-sentinel.com/2025/12/10/democrat-rob-long-wins-big-in-florida-house-race-defeating-maga-republican/[/URL]
Note the wins by more than 20-points for Long. Looks like the Latinos are finally waking up to the reality of MAGA?
-
Hegseth 'Double-Tap' was so gruesome
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3041815]Pete Hegseth had to make a second strike on the "combatants" because they were still dangerous. They could ham swam thousands of miles across the Atlantic and attacked America! LOL.[/QUOTE]That was pretty a good jest!
But [NOPARSE]seriously, the very thing you seemingly jest about, it's even more hilarious to hear and see, coming from sycophant MAGA/Repub politicians, that argue those very same preposterous claims, trying to defend, $50K NDA "nuisance" suit accused rapist,[/NOPARSE] Pete [B]"Double-Tap"[/B] Hegseth, from what looks like murder, in the eyes of many lawmakers.
Apparently, the sight of seeing the video's gruesome footage, has several politicians feeling sickly and one throwing-up!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3041579]If you want to start a side-debate on how to best heat an RV in the electrical age, then set it up for a side debate...I'm game![/QUOTE]Man has been able to heat himself since discovering fire. A RV has two heaters on average within. If you want free, you could add a wood burning oven, and a space heater can run all night on a car battery. That is easy-peasy.
AC use has really only taken off in the last 100 years, and there are still places around the world that need it. For the most part, using solar to try to displace fossil fuels was one of the dumbest things I have seen in my lifetime, but there have been some plusses to all the money spent on it.
When you see something like a 200 watt solar panel, that number is bullshit. That is 200 watts on a clear day between 10 AM and 2 PM. At other times, the panel is not generating that much electricity nor is it doing it at night or if there are clouds, fog, or rain. So unless you only need electricity for 4 hours, you need to have a lot more equipment including a power station that can charge up batteries. And given there are days that there is barely any sun, it would be crazy to have a power station with only solar input. With RVs today, power stations can get energy and charge batteries from a car alternator, a wall socket, solar panels, other batteries, or generators.
The various voltages are what appliances can run at, and power stations output to different voltages. Here is a woman checking out ACs at various voltages. If you go to the 7:15 point on this video, you can see a woman showing you the power usage and cooling power of various AC units, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CXCWdxj22Q[/URL]
The cheat sheet is 12 volts used the least power, 120 volts used the most with the most cooling, and 48 volts may have been the most cost effective in terms of cooling per watt. Some are saying 48 volt appliances are the future. That is what I meant by various voltages.
There is so much bad to say about solar but the cool part is that it can be generated anywhere outside of maybe the extreme North and South regions. Just like you no longer need phone lines to use cell phones, you do not need power lines and huge central facilities to generate power. You can plop solar almost anywhere, and I can see huge applications particularly in the 3rd world for doing this.
I was kind of fascinated about having an island in the remote South Pacfic that does not have fresh water. Can you toss in a solar powered plant and do desalinazation, get fresh water, and live somewhere that was previously uninhabitable? I do not see why not.
The big issue with solar and RVs are how heavy the fucking batteries are. A lot of RVs have only a few hundred pounds of carrying capacity. If you have a big power station with a spare battery, and you add in your own weight, you might not be safe to carry anything else. Still, while it may be cheaper in the short term to power an AC unit with a generator, generators are loud, smell bad, and wake people up. If I use a fuel efficient, powerful AC unit, you can be in stealth mode and "camp" wherever you want. My plan then is to use a generator as little as possible.
Now there is the stupid. Yeah, you can get by for a day or three with no sun and relying on battery power, but there are way too many times, the sunlight is inadequate for months or weeks and when that happens, you HAVE to have a different power source which is usually natural gas. So solar can reduce carbon emissions but the notion that it can eliminate them? Get the fuck out of here! There is not enough battery storage for periods of low sun. It is not doable.
And then there is the naming of petrostate versus electrostatic. Oh brother. The best part of solar is that anyone can generate it. The state should be a million miles away it. If people can generate their own power, use more energy efficient appliances, and save money, they will! This disastrous green policy was a consequence of the Democrat carbon bad, solar good, big government must do everything dumb Democrat thinking. In the pre AI world, less carbon was doable while no carbon or carbon neutral power generation was a boneheaded and dangerous pipe dream.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3041579]Both China and Europe are further ahead at becoming electrostate, than the U.S. and therefore perhaps better equipped to handle future AI power needs. Under your dumbass MAGA 2.0 admin, it is actively promoting the coal industry by opening federal lands for coal mining and providing financial support to modernize coal-fired power plants. So tell me Elvis 2008, who do you think is paying for the current power (and water) needs of AI, data centers and crypto? Also, how do you think the U.S. is going to manage the fast growing power need of AI? Meaning where is the excess power going to be generated from, especially under the current clown shit-show MAGA admin? Is it nuclear? Is it "Drill Baby Drill"? Or just out of thin air?.[/QUOTE]Oh brother. Talk about the stench of TDS. Europe signed off on the Paris accords. Trump withdrew the USA from those accords and Thank God he did. As of now, you have AlGore and yourself thinking that was a bad idea. Bill Gates and all the tech Democrats have changed their tunes but as usual, you are stuck on the binary. Green good, carbon bad. And as usual, your little pea brain insulted Bill Gates, one of your own, instead of seeing why he changed his mind on climate change.
And no, you are not getting me defending Bill Gates but unlike you, I can clearly see why he changed his mind.
As for who is paying for the increased amount of electricity that data centers are using, I am guessing you are trying to say that data centers by using so much electricity are costing consumers more money. Yes, that is how it works with supply and demand.
As for Trump and coal, yeah, that is true but again you do not see the why. It is just more of the Trump is evil bullshit TDS.
While you are busy fighting the dumb Democratic war of green versus fossil fuels, you failed to notice that war has ended. Fossil fuels are in such demand for electricity the wait for natural gas turbines is like five years now. The USA needs to double its electricity production to win the AI war ASAP and with new gas greatly slowed down, that means nukes and / or coal and in the USA with nukes, nothing ever happens fast. I would prefer nukes to coal any day but yeah, I expect electricity from coal use to skyrocket while everyone talks up the nuclear game while nothing gets done.
And while you are giving Europe its props for its "electrostate" status, you fail to notice that their electric costs are so high, they are effectively priced out of the AI race so thank God, Trump pulled us out of the Paris accords and the green energy bullshit scam that was climate change or we would be where Europe is right now.
If a Democrat wants to call that decision lucky or say a broken clock is right twice a day, that is fine, but not you. No, Europe was and is smart with its green energy programs. Unreal.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3041934]Yeah, I have no doubt, should he find himself jailed for murder and war crimes, the nickname [I]"Double Tap"[/I] will serve him well, in the jail prison showers.
Since when was MURDER inconsequential? Make no mistake about it, many lawmakers report the 22 strikes were MURDER! [B]The Legal Consequences of Pete Hegseths Kill Them All Order,[/B] December 1, 2025 [URL]https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/the-legal-consequences-of-pete-hegseths-kill-them-all-order[/URL]
Is it any wonder that Admiral Alvin Holsey, wanted no part of this murderous illegal strikes? He was right to retire, rather than be a patsy to Hegseth and company.
Amidst the grifting, [NOPARSE]corruption, sympathizing with pedophiles and murder, are all pretty serious. But don't you worry, Americans are telling us, exactly what they think of your MAGA Fuhrer's failed policies...at the [/NOPARSE]BALLOT-BOX, in many districts, where your Fuhrer had double-digits wins in Nov 2024.[/QUOTE]LOL, If Hegseth gets any type of punishment what so ever for killing Narco terrorists, I promise I will never post again. You have my word. Nothing is going to happen to him, too many people at this point have lost loved ones or close friends to fentanyl, myself included, and understand some type of meaning deterrence needs to be enacted. I am personally thrilled that Hegseth ordered them all killed. He is protecting American lives. That is the goal of the United States Military. But we all know this, I don't need to keep repeating the same old stuff, Dems would rather win elections than protect American lives. Dems really care about two Narco terrorists who were trying to poison Americans.
As for Midterms, it looks like it will be a strong victory for Dems, but that is not due to any failure on Trump. Independents want the Trump economy of 2016 and it just isn't here so they will stay home while the TDS crowd will be racing to the ballot.
I could do a Biden failure list to show what a truly horrible president looks like but we all know the shit show his Presidency was so I will spare you.
-
3 photos
Trump's economy began in 2018 at the earliest. Not 2016.
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3042053]LOL, If Hegseth gets any type of punishment what so ever for killing Narco terrorists, I promise I will never post again. You have my word. Nothing is going to happen to him, too many people at this point have lost loved ones or close friends to fentanyl, myself included, and understand some type of meaning deterrence needs to be enacted. I am personally thrilled that Hegseth ordered them all killed. He is protecting American lives. That is the goal of the United States Military. But we all know this, I don't need to keep repeating the same old stuff, Dems would rather win elections than protect American lives. Dems really care about two Narco terrorists who were trying to poison Americans.
As for Midterms, it looks like it will be a strong victory for Dems, but that is not due to any failure on Trump. [B]Independents want the Trump economy of 2016 and it just isn't here so they will stay home while the TDS crowd will be racing to the ballot.[/b]
I could do a Biden failure list to show what a truly horrible president looks like but we all know the shit show his Presidency was so I will spare you.[/QUOTE]Donald Trump was not president in 2016. Barack Obama was. For every day of it.
Donald Trump's one and only first term economic legislation was not even signed and passed until the last government business day of 2017, December 22.
Until 2018, Donald Trump was merely coasting on the positive economic trajectories hard fought and won by Obama-Biden and the Dems in Congress while recovering the USA Economy from the horrific Great Recession produced by Repub GW Bush and his Repub Congress and without any meaningful assistance in pulling America out of that historically deep ditch by the Repub Party that plunged us into it and instead only constant opposition and obstruction by them.
2018, the first year anyone could possibly characterize as a "Trump Economy", saw no significant increase in GDP Growth despite his one and only economic legislation having added Trillions to the deficit. Fewer jobs were created with his economic legislation in place than had been created in each of the previous three years without it. His failed tariff and trade war with China plunged American farmers and the manufacturing industry into Recession so deep Trump had to issue emergency welfare checks just to keep them afloat. Same as today. Before the end of that first year of the "Trump Economy", the broad USA Stock Market suffered a Bear Market decline.
The sole reason for any American wage increases under Trump was because 20+ Blue States and Blue Cities increased the Minimum Wage in 2018 and 2019, despite Trump and his fellow Repub Congressional leadership adamantly opposing such an increase, same as they do today. But that didn't stop Trump from falsely taking credit for those Blue State and Blue City Minimum Wage increases that neither he nor his Repub policies had anything whatsoever to do with.
The rest of Trump's first term racked up the worst economic and jobs creation results in almost 100 years, going all the way back to the results of Repub President Herbert Hoover, who along with Repub Trump were the only presidents in that 100 years who left office with fewer jobs in the economy than were in it the day he took office.
And that was due almost entirely to the disastrous economic and national security decisions he made in 2018 and 2019 to defund and remove the highly effective Pandemic Prevention and Response team leadership from those Chinese labs, contrary to all expert warnings for him not to do something so dangerous and stupid. Followed by his exacerbating his initial colossal blunder by spending critical year 2020 lying about the reality of his Pandemic, mocking the known mitigation measures, lying that it was "disappearing already", discouraging anyone and everyone from inventing a vaccine for it much less taking a vaccine for it by lying that "it will go away without a vaccine" over and over again.
Again, eerily similar to what he is doing right now in his 2nd failed presidential term.
Consequently, it was Trump's Pandemic and only Trump's Pandemic that triggered virtually all of the millions of deaths, business, school and travel venue closures, the millions of jobs wiped out, the collapse of global supply-chains and the higher Inflation that unavoidably followed.
From which Biden-Harris recovered America in historic fashion with their stimulus legislation, immigration policy and leadership, recovering all of the millions of jobs Trump wiped out and then creating more new ones than all three previous Repub presidents combined, Trump, Bush2 and Bush1, and doing so with lower inflation than any other major country that did not follow Biden's brilliant methods for it, leading directly to the Envy of the World Economy that Biden-Harris handed Trump on a silver platter that he has since touching it turned to shit and is now rapidly trying to kill.
Ok. Now remind us of all those Biden failures to which you alluded.
-
Bad Ass Double Tap Pete has my blessings that's for sure
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3041884]Double Tap is a bad ass nickname. I wish I could get a cool nickname like that. Honestly, Its all stupid irrelevant shit you are crying about. As I have already stated, only people with TDS really care about that stuff. I could care less if Cash Patel and Hegseth are trying to get some pussy on the side. Could care less if Hegseth drinks and parties too much, so did Ulysses S. Grant and he saved the Union in Civil War. Would I prefer a squeaky clean government under Trump, absolutely. But do I and the American people really care about this inconsequential shit. Nope. So many more real issues to focus on. Securing border, removing dangerous illegals, securing trade deals, keeping stock and real estate market strong, tough on crime, fighting cartels, fighting inflation. Those are the things that really matter. Dems just have nothing else to report so they blow this stuff way out of proportion and the TDS crowd buys right into it like the sheep they are.
How is the White House ballroom renovation going? Did we plan a race riot protest to stop wasting money on the White House remodel LOL? Every American can receive a one penny tax credit with the money saved hahaha.[/QUOTE]To turn all those terrorists into shark food.
[URL]https://www.kare11.com/article/news/local/middle-school-student-1500-fentanyl-laced-pills/89-eb1f0306-00ce-49fc-b109-cc1026f6a80d[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3042082]Donald Trump was not president in 2016. Barack Obama was. For every day of it.
Donald Trump's one and only first term economic legislation was not even signed and passed until the last government business day of 2017, December 22.
Until 2018, Donald Trump was merely coasting on the positive economic trajectories hard fought and won by Obama-Biden and the Dems in Congress while recovering the USA Economy from the horrific Great Recession produced by Repub GW Bush and his Repub Congress and without any meaningful assistance in pulling America out of that historically deep ditch by the Repub Party that plunged us into it and instead only constant opposition and obstruction by them..[/QUOTE]LOL I love how you refer to it as "Trump's Pandemic". If the Trump Derangement crowd got their way, the entire history of America would be rewritten as your doing with the Pandemic. I can't wait to learn about "Trump's Great Depression of the 1920's" and "Trump's Viet Nam War" and "Trump's Bill Clinton Sex Scandal of the 1990's". The one not involving Epstein just to be clear LOL.
When Trump actually does something you can criticize him for, please let me know. You know like the Biden Afgan pull out or The Hunter Biden Crack working girl gun video or the Pipe line closure costing tens of thousands jobs and increasing energy prices or backing the Green New Scam / Deal or endless supply chain issues increasing consumer prices or 9% inflation or starting the war in Ukraine and Israel by showing extreme military ineptitude and wildly dividing the country or opening up the border and allowing an entire nation of non skilled immigrants into our country or going to completely senile J. The. Vance has to assume control of the country or allowing men into women's sports or having nude Transexuals run around on the White House lawn LOL. Anything along those lines happens, please let me know LOL.
-
Say What?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3042053]LOL, If Hegseth gets any type of punishment what so ever for killing Narco terrorists, I promise I will never post again. You have my word. Nothing is going to happen to him, too many people at this point have lost loved ones or close friends to fentanyl, myself included, and understand some type of meaning deterrence needs to be enacted. I am personally thrilled that Hegseth ordered them all killed. He is protecting American lives. That is the goal of the United States Military. But we all know this, I don't need to keep repeating the same old stuff, Dems would rather win elections than protect American lives. Dems really care about two Narco terrorists who were trying to poison Americans.
As for Midterms, it looks like it will be a strong victory for Dems, but that is not due to any failure on Trump. Independents want the Trump economy of 2016 and it just isn't here so they will stay home while the TDS crowd will be racing to the ballot.
I could do a Biden failure list to show what a truly horrible president looks like but we all know the shit show his Presidency was so I will spare you.[/QUOTE]What about Juan Orlando Hernandez the former Honduran President who was pardoned by Trump after being convicted of conspiring to import of 400 tons of cocaine into the US? How does that square with what Hegseth and Co are doing in the Caribbean?
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3042154]What about Juan Orlando Hernandez the former Honduran President who was pardoned by Trump after being convicted of conspiring to import of 400 tons of cocaine into the US? How does that square with what Hegseth and Co are doing in the Caribbean?[/QUOTE]Never heard of him, care to post a link explaining it? Also, When I said Hegseth will not get in trouble, I mean legal trouble. I actually don't think he is ready for the position and I would imagine he may eventually fired. I love that he is using lethal force against Narco terrorists to save Americans, he can't show weakness like he has been though.
-
Tampon Tim at his best
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3042201]Never heard of him, care to post a link explaining it? Also, When I said Hegseth will not get in trouble, I mean legal trouble. I actually don't think he is ready for the position and I would imagine he may eventually fired. I love that he is using lethal force against Narco terrorists to save Americans, he can't show weakness like he has been though.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/border/2025/12/14/worst-of-the-worst-400-criminal-aliens-busted-in-minnesota-walzs-sanctuary-policies-blamed/[/URL]
-
Google
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3042201]Never heard of him, care to post a link explaining it? Also, When I said Hegseth will not get in trouble, I mean legal trouble. I actually don't think he is ready for the position and I would imagine he may eventually fired. I love that he is using lethal force against Narco terrorists to save Americans, he can't show weakness like he has been though.[/QUOTE]If you watch FOX News and nothing else then that explains why you are uninformed. This affair in the Caribbean is just distraction from the soon to be due Epstein Files. Doesn't make sense to use our armed forces to chase nickel and dime drug traffickers (there's no proof of that BTW) headed to Surinam.
Trump won't be in office forever there's nothing stopping a future president from giving Hegseth a one way air fare to The Hague free of chargee courtesy of the US government.
-
3 photos
Biden's Afghan pullout? LOL
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3042089]LOL I love how you refer to it as "Trump's Pandemic". If the Trump Derangement crowd got their way, the entire history of America would be rewritten as your doing with the Pandemic. I can't wait to learn about "Trump's Great Depression of the 1920's" and "Trump's Viet Nam War" and "Trump's Bill Clinton Sex Scandal of the 1990's". The one not involving Epstein just to be clear LOL.
When Trump actually does something you can criticize him for, please let me know. You know like the Biden Afgan pull out or The Hunter Biden Crack working girl gun video or the Pipe line closure costing tens of thousands jobs and increasing energy prices or backing the Green New Scam / Deal or endless supply chain issues increasing consumer prices or 9% inflation or starting the war in Ukraine and Israel by showing extreme military ineptitude and wildly dividing the country or opening up the border and allowing an entire nation of non skilled immigrants into our country or going to completely senile J. The. Vance has to assume control of the country or allowing men into women's sports or having nude Transexuals run around on the White House lawn LOL. Anything along those lines happens, please let me know LOL.[/QUOTE]It really is astonishing how little if any Real News Facts you know, which must account for the truly bizarre fact-free conclusions you have somehow been led into believing by some of the most blatantly obvious con men and liars in history.
Well, we certainly can't fault Trump's pullout of any quagmire, counter-productive Repub-initiated USA War on his watch since he happily presided over a raging War in Afghanistan for the entirety of his presidency and did not pull us out of one. Obama did. Biden did. But between those two great presidencies we had Trump assuring us he could end any war on day one with a simple phonecall. I guess he misplaced his phone on January 2017 and couldn't find it until January 2021.
Biden's withdrawal from Repub Bush's War in Afghanistan was the least deadly withdrawal from an occupied country by the losing side in modern warfare history. Maybe in all of history. Can you name a less deadly one?
The tragic death of 13 USA military personnel by a single suicide bomber had nothing to do with security lapses by Biden or anyone else in the USA Military. Thanks to Trump, that was a Talaban operation and the suicide bomber likely came from among the 5,000 violent jihadists Trump agreed to set free in the country as part of his unconditional surrender to the Talaban.
For more Real News Facts about who fucked up the chance of a better withdrawal result than the historically successful one Biden effected despite the crap sandwich conditions for it that Trump "nehotiated", please see the screenshot below.
LOL. And you are actually comparing Hunter Biden's laptop photos of him getting a foot job from a hooker and those other non issues to Trump's disastrous economic and national security decision results to defund and remove the highly effective Pandemic Prevention and Response team leadership from those Chinese labs in 2018 and 2019, contrary to all expert warnings for him not to do something so dangerous and stupid, something BTW that is strikingly similar to what he is doing right now with the CDC communications systems, which even according to Trump's own March 2020 audio recorded admission was responsible for creating his Pandemic that otherwise could have been confined to a manageable epidemic in one region of China until a vaccine remedy was invented and administered?
Had Biden, Obama or Clinton defunded and removed that leadership team from those Chinese labs contrary to all expert warnings for them not to do that just a few months before a worldwide Pandemic was allowed to develop aa a direct result of there being no responsible parties on site to monitor and report the earliest cases, you can bet the farm Fux News and you would have been referring to it as Biden's Pandemic, etc al, with every one of the million American deaths from it.
And they and you would have been right to do it.
Also, Joe Biden has never been senile or cognitively impaired enough to believe the load of crap from a con man that other countries pay America's taxes for them including import / tariff taxes.
Do you know anyone senile and cognitively impaired enough to believe much less assert that Billions of dollars are "flowing into" America from China, Brazil, India or anywhere else when America pays Trump's American Import taxes?
-
Free weapons kill more than 16000 people every year, keep on like this. Same than Netanyahou is responsible for Australia and others around the world. I wonder if Israel will get rid of him on next elections.
-
Murder on the highseas, is there a link for that?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3042201]Never heard of him, care to post a link explaining it? Also, When I said Hegseth will not get in trouble, I mean legal trouble. I actually don't think he is ready for the position and I would imagine he may eventually fired. I love that he is using lethal force against Narco terrorists to save Americans, he can't show weakness like he has been though.[/QUOTE] Now that just hilarious, you of all people, telling someone else, to post a link of factual information! GTFOH! As for Hegseth, I'm thoroughly enjoying the idiot squirm under that scrutiny of congress and lawmakers, for [B]murder on the highseas[/B].
-
FOXY Muse MAGA brainwashing of 'Narco Terrorist' and Fentanyl out of Venezuela
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3042053]LOL, If Hegseth gets any type of punishment what so ever for killing Narco terrorists, I promise I will never post again. You have my word. Nothing is going to happen to him, too many people at this point have lost loved ones or close friends to fentanyl, myself included, and understand some type of meaning deterrence needs to be enacted. I am personally thrilled that Hegseth ordered them all killed. He is protecting American lives. That is the goal of the United States Military. But we all know this, I don't need to keep repeating the same old stuff, Dems would rather win elections than protect American lives. Dems really care about two Narco terrorists who were trying to poison Americans..[/QUOTE]What [NOPARSE]the hell...has your Fuhrer and FOXY Muse, got you believing in "Narco terrorists"? ...Hilarious!!!! How gullible do they think their audiences[/NOPARSE] are?
Yeah, they [NOPARSE] have you believing the boogeyman "Narco terrorists" are coming to get ya from Venezuela, but the pardoning by your MAGA Fuhrer for several of the big drug traffickers (such as Juan Orlando Hernández, fmr. Honduran Pres. as mentioned here several times here and has been in the news for the last several weeks), that has poisoned, drugged-up and killed untold Americans, with 360+ tons of cocaine, according to you, you apparently...KNOW nothin about it! Did I get that right?
Well by all means, continue to be brainwashed over at FOXY Muse! But if you're going to continue to debate the bigger threat w/r to drug trafficking, perhaps try doing a little homework. Does it not behoove you, to at the very least, Google the fmr. Honduran President? Or just stay ignorant?
BTW, I know, down at FOXY Muse and in Trumpland, they've been telling you, that fentanyl is being produced and transported from Venezuela,[/NOPARSE] but [B]it's all LIES[/B]. [NOPARSE]Cocaine yes, but for fentanyl...perhaps they should try looking to Mexico or China![/NOPARSE].
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3042053]I could do a Biden failure list to show what a truly horrible president looks like but we all know the shit show his Presidency was so I will spare you.[/QUOTE]Hey don't do me any favors, got ahead and knock yourself out, [B]print the list![/B].
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041942]Man has been able to heat himself since discovering fire. A RV has two heaters on average within. If you want free, you could add a wood burning oven, and a space heater can run all night on a car battery. That is easy-peasy.
AC use has really only taken off in the last 100 years, and there are still places around the world that need it. For the most part, using solar to try to displace fossil fuels was one of the dumbest things I have seen in my lifetime, but there have been some plusses to all the money spent on it.
When you see something like a 200 watt solar panel, that number is bullshit. That is 200 watts on a clear day between 10 AM and 2 PM. At other times, the panel is not generating that much electricity nor is it doing it at night or if there are clouds, fog, or rain. So unless you only need electricity for 4 hours, you need to have a lot more equipment including a power station that can charge up batteries. And given there are days that there is barely any sun, it would be crazy to have a power station with only solar input. With RVs today, power stations can get energy and charge batteries from a car alternator, a wall socket, solar panels, other batteries, or generators..[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2025/12/15/watch-landman-rips-the-view-hosts-who-hate-millionaires-and-trump-and-men-and-you-and-me/[/URL]
-
I really really hate masks
I traveled plenty during the CCP / Wuhan Flu sham, never wearing a mask and I never became ill.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/evidence-clear-masks-dont-do-anything[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3042280]What [NOPARSE]the hell...has your Fuhrer and FOXY Muse, got you believing in "Narco terrorists"? ...Hilarious!!!! How gullible do they think their audiences[/NOPARSE] are?
Yeah, they [NOPARSE] have you believing the boogeyman "Narco terrorists" are coming to get ya from Venezuela, but the pardoning by your MAGA Fuhrer for several of the big drug traffickers (such as Juan Orlando Hernndez, fmr. Honduran Pres. as mentioned here several times here and has been in the news for the last several weeks), that has poisoned, drugged-up and killed untold Americans, with 360+ tons of cocaine, according to you, you apparently...KNOW nothin about it! Did I get that right?
Well by all means, continue to be brainwashed over at FOXY Muse! But if you're going to continue to debate the bigger threat w/r to drug trafficking, perhaps try doing a little homework. Does it not behoove you, to at the very least, Google the fmr. Honduran President? Or just stay ignorant?.[/QUOTE]How is it we share a country and you can actually believe the things you type? I have a strong hatred for you personally and usually I do play up the rhetoric because of the personal attacks you have sent me, but this just makes me feel so sorry for you.
Please go educate yourself on the cartels of Latin America. They kill tens of thousands of humans every year. They engage in human trafficking and they use their vast wealth to corrupt the politicians of Latin America. They are evil humans. This is not up for debate. Label them however you want, call them Narcos, drug dealers, Terrorists, entrepenuers, it doesn't matter. What matters is their actions. They kill, torture, rape, and terrorize thousands all over Latin America every year. I have absolutely no problem using the United States Military to kill them as a deterrence to hinder their activity. Anyone who doesn't suffer from TDS gets this immeadiately. Now we add in the two other major factors. Many of these cartels cut their drugs with fentanyl for easy profits which has deadly consequences for the user. So dumb I have to keep telling you this. Go count last year fentanyl poisonings. Go ask Robert Deniro about how he feels about fentanyl and how his son was poisoned to death by it. Cartels also traffic in massive numbers of illegal immigrants with vast criminal records. Many times this is done covertly with the governments of the home country to empty out the prison population because it is a financial burden on the state. I can't make this any more clear, the drug cartels of Latin America are evil and deadly force as a deterrent is 100% justified at this point. If you added up all the deaths from the last twenty years, it is probably in the millions at this point. How much longer should USA turn a blind eye and let the innocent be poisoned and murdered and raped?
I will also address Trump's comments on Rob Reiner's murder. Trump is 100% wrong and I am ashamed of his behavior and I truly wish he hadn't have said those things and I can't justify that behavior or even explain it. It does appear Trump truly does hate the extreme left.
That being said. Rob Reiner, his wife, and his son are all victims of drug cartels in a sense. Those drugs, "cocaine", rot your brain to the point where you are no longer in control of your emotions or behavior and his son was a long time drug addict. Hopefully these senseless murders shed light on the horrors of letting drug cartels run wild and poison our nation. Rob Reiner and his wife did not deserve this.
As for Juan Hernandez, sorry I work full time and I can't follow every story. I watched a few videos on him and I don't know it well enough to offer a valid opinion on. I will say that our own Law enforcement makes deals with drug dealers all the time to catch bigger fish or fullfill more important agendas. It is just part of the game. From what I have seen though, Hernandez was wrongfully convicted and Trump is backing him because he has played ball with the USA for a long time. It is what it is. I am not thrilled to read about it, but again if I have to choose between open border policy of the left and Biden and the border policy of Trump who is shady at times and says horrific things from time to time, it is still an easy choice. I choice to save lives and fight cartels and protect Americans from poison.
BTW cocaine addiction is a horrible thing. Its almost no better then fentanyl. Go look up the crack addicts of Kensington in Philadelphia if you think smuggling in cocaine is no big deal. Insane your even making this argument. At least try to stick to the legal aspects of when to use deadly force on non combatants in times of peace between nations like CNN does. You just go completely full TDS right from the go and try defend cocaine smugglers like its no crime at all and no one gets hurt from it LOL. You really should not even be allowed to post because you make you people look so foolish LOL.
[URL]https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/criminal-violence-mexico[/URL]
According to the article, 30,000 people are murdered by the Cartel every year just in Mexico. Probably 10 times that if you count all of Latin America. 300 k a year buddy. Keep up the noble work defending the cartel.
-
Tsk tsk Dearest Greta aka Algore in drag
[URL]https://amgreatness.com/2025/12/15/what-happened-to-the-climate-change-cult/[/URL]
-
She needs to die in a cage with Scumbag Bubba and his hideous husband
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/15/us/politics/pelosi-stock-trading-ban.html[/URL]
-
Electricity prices as a deciding factor for AI successs, I think NOT!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041942] Europe signed off on the Paris accords. Trump withdrew the USA from those accords and Thank God he did. ... Green good, carbon bad.
...
And no, you are not getting me defending Bill Gates but unlike you, I can clearly see why he changed his mind.[/QUOTE]For all your rants on Bill Gates, when did anyone with an once of renewable, clean energy and green environmental savvy ever turn to Bill Gates, as an expert person for that intelligent knowledge space? Gates is fine when it comes to computers and AI? When it comes to renewables and clean energy, his money and investments do the loudest and best talking, as demonstrated in an upcoming post.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041942]As for who is paying for the increased amount of electricity that data centers are using, I am guessing you are trying to say that data centers by using so much electricity are costing consumers more money. Yes, that is how it works with supply and demand. ... Fossil fuels are in such demand for electricity the wait for natural gas turbines is like five years now. The USA needs to double its electricity production to win the AI war ASAP and with new gas greatly slowed down, ... I would prefer nukes
...
And while you are giving Europe its props for its "electrostate" status, you fail to notice that their electric costs are so high, they are effectively priced out of the AI race so thank God[/QUOTE]If the USA (under the MAGA Fuhrer) want to burn fossil fuels, be it coal or gas and build multi-billion dollar boondoggle unproven SMRs and money-pit nuclear reactors and ignore the low cost renewables, as the cheapest form of energy production today, then. GOOD LUCK with that! Not too mention, it has probably lost the AI race already, if we are to believe your cooked up "theory", that based on electricity prices, that will determine, who will win the AI race or be most successful.
Keep in mind China and Europe's grids have already transitioned to 62% and 54% renewables, respectively. [B]Renewables capacity doubles in first half (China)[/B] (July 31,2025) [URL]https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/statistics/202507/31/content_WS688ae199c6d0868f4e8f490d.html[/URL] [B]Solar leads EU electricity generation as renewables hit 54%[/B] [URL]https://electrek.co/2025/09/30/solar-leads-eu-electricity-generation-as-renewables-hit-54-percent/[/URL] The you. S not so much, at around 25% renewables.
BTW, where is your data to backup your claims?
So while you pose a interesting question, that takes "the race to AI success" and boil it down to a two-horse race, between the USA And China, based of electricity prices, unfortunately not buying into your premise that electricity prices, even close to being a key factor, let alone a mitigating factor. I think your argument is weak and flawed.
[B]Simply put, your electricity argument...[u]is an oversimplification[/u], of who will succeed.[/B] There will be many key factors, that make up which companies / countries will win the AI race. And while the price of electricity maybe a one key factor, among many, nothing you've said, leads me to believe, it is the prevailing key factor, above all others, that will determine success.
-
Does heating a RV dovetail with electrostate AI dreams in a petrostate world?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041942]Man has been able to heat himself since discovering fire. A RV has two heaters on average within. If you want free, you could add a wood burning oven, and a space heater can run all night on a car battery. That is easy-peasy.[/QUOTE]Sure, [NOPARSE]if you take the proper precautions not to burn down your camper with space heaters and don't mind the poisoning or killing yourself, from wood burning stove carbon monoxide risks. But I wouldn't exactly call them FREE! And good luck charging your car battery (lead-ion??) Every day. Have you thought about a heat pump and a Li-ion batter power [/NOPARSE]station?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041942]AC use has really only taken off in the last 100 years, and there are still places around the world that need it. For the most part, using solar to try to displace fossil fuels was one of the dumbest things I have seen in my lifetime, but there have been some plusses to all the money spent on it.
When you see something like a 200 watt solar panel, ...
My plan then is to use a generator as little as possible. ...
So solar can reduce carbon emissions but the notion that it can eliminate them? Get the fuck out of here! There is not enough battery storage for periods of low sun. It is not doable.[/QUOTE]Sorry [NOPARSE]but I'm unable to follow your train of thought. Do you want to debate the adv/disadv of solar/batteries? Or want to swap ideas, on how best to heat an RV? Or are you trying to say solar/batteries for heating RVs don't mix?
What is the precise topic, this post is trying to or supposed to [/NOPARSE]address?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3041942]And then there is the naming of petrostate versus electrostatic. ... This disastrous green policy was a consequence of the Democrat carbon bad, solar good, big government must do everything dumb Democrat thinking. In the pre AI world, less carbon was doable while no carbon or carbon neutral power generation was a boneheaded and dangerous pipe dream.[/QUOTE]That would be Electrostate vs. Petrostate, ie. China is the former and the USA Is the later. If by "green policy", you're referring to President Joe Biden's very successful, IRA and USA Clean Energy Programs, involving the innovative clean energy and renewable initiatives given to industry to kick-start cleaner green energy alternatives, than you couldn't be more wrong, as to how "boneheaded" they are.
And to be clear, while I know fossil fuels, petro-carbons and chemicals will be around for a long-time to come, and have many great uses. However, my interest lies, in highlighting the many ways in which we can decarbonize without BURNING FOSSIL FUELS, which is totally doable for perhaps 90% of industry, when you see (in my next post) the latest from a clean energy company [B]Rondo Energy (California), [/B] that benefited immensely impart with funding from President Joe Biden's IRA Clean Energy bill.
Hate all you want on President Joe Biden's IRA Clean, Green, Renewables Energy & Chips Bills, all you want, it doesn't take-away from the fact, they were a hugely successful!
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Rondo's Energy's Revolutionary Heat (Bricks) Battery
[B]FACT:[/B] 3/4 of energy used by industry, is in the form of HEAT, not electricity.
Rondo's Heat (Bricks) Battery, is now solving that industry problem. With free [B]electrons from intermittent solar and wind,[/B] that are now a cheaper source of electricity, than burning fossil fuels. This now provides the means, by which to generate [B]over 1000+ degrees Celsius[/B] in their heat battery, delivering industrial strength heat, as either hot-air or steam to customers, required to solve and meet (about 95% they claim) of the industrial sectors heating energy needs.
Rondo Energy, literally promote their heat battery that replaces boilers, where [I]"It's as simple as, we heat bricks with toaster wire (like the one in your kitchen) and it doesn't get cheaper than that!"[/I].
[B]Worlds largest industrial heat battery is online and solar-powered,[/B] October 16,2025 [URL]https://electrek.co/2025/10/16/worlds-largest-industrial-heat-battery-is-online-and-solar-powered/[/URL] and [B]CNBC - How Thermal Batteries Could Replace Lithium-Ion Batteries[/B] [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXPMXVLs3-Q[/URL].
Having [NOPARSE] just finished a a 100 MWh/20MWh (heat battery/solar) project in California (for an Oil Company of all people), now other industry companies from cement producers to chemical plants, are lining up, for a chance to decarbonize their industries.
WOW!...The applications are huge for this very revolutionary heat battery and for all major commercial and industrial companies that use high temperature heat for their materials processing.
Thanks again impart to President Joe Biden's IRA Clean Energy bill initiatives. And best of all no moronic unnecessary "Drill-Baby-Drill", thanks to clean green renewable energy out-of-the-box thinking. I would even venture to image, it even has, residential block and community[/NOPARSE] based heating applications or possibly heating their buildings.
[B]P.S.:[/B] BTW, Bill Gates is a major contributor and backer to this clean green energy company. As far as I'm concerned with Bill Gates, I'll let his millions in clean green investments do the talking!
-
Speak!
Chump Chief of Staff drops truth bombs! The dam is breaking:
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/16/politics/susie-wiles-interview-trump[/URL]
-
Yeah it's a sham
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3042404]I traveled plenty during the CCP / Wuhan Flu sham, never wearing a mask and I never became ill.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/evidence-clear-masks-dont-do-anything[/URL][/QUOTE]Your sentiments were shared by former presidential candidate Herman Cain who is no longer with us. At the end of day was it worth it to not wear the mask?
-
The fall of USD under drunk orange. I don t buy US products, same than Chinese low quality, but make me feel richer.
-
I don't know what killed Cain but he was 75
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3042594]Your sentiments were shared by former presidential candidate Herman Cain who is no longer with us. At the end of day was it worth it to not wear the mask?[/QUOTE]Something else killed him, not wearing a mask wasn't it.
I was 50 in perfect health.
But you brain dead sheeple loved them, so why don't you still wear them?
I loved seeing fools walking down the street alone wearing them or driving alone LMFAO.
[URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/masks-outdoor-recess-burr-elementary-chicago-public-schools/[/URL]
I can't breathe with a mask blocking my airflow, if they ever mandate them again I promise you now I won't be wearing them.
BTW do you know English? Do you know how to read? Did you see what did the mask link showed.
-
Rule of Law and the Right to Due Process!
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3042421]Please go educate yourself on the cartels of Latin America. They kill tens of thousands of humans every year. ...
...
BTW cocaine addiction is a horrible thing. Its almost no better then fentanyl. Go look up the crack addicts of Kensington in Philadelphia if you think smuggling in cocaine is no big deal. Insane your even making this argument. ...
...
Keep up the noble work defending the cartel.[/QUOTE]Good rant and truth be told, I did enjoy a good chuckle over your strawman arguments, but really, for all your barking about cocaine and fentanyl, it's tad bit funny, you still don't seem to understand [B]the basic concept of being lied to,[/B] by FOXY MUSE and your MAGA Fuhrer, about fentanyl coming out of Venezuela, when they're NOT! This matters, since fentanyl, distributed mainly out of Mexico and China, is what is being attributed to most drug deaths in America.
It's so hilarious, how you gullible MAGA suckers, again and again, buy into your MAGA Fuhrer's lies, corruption and pretexts, to whip-up support for an illegal attack on Venezuela, with some "narco terrorist" bullshit (just like the war on Iraq), for some personal vendetta and "Drill-Baby-Drill" unlawful and illegal capture of Venezuelan state oil and property. It's sad really!
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3042421]At least try to stick to the legal aspects of when to use deadly force on non combatants in times of peace between nations like CNN does. You just go completely full TDS right from the go and try defend cocaine smugglers like its no crime at all and no one gets hurt from it LOL. You really should not even be allowed to post because you make you people look so foolish LOL.[/QUOTE]Hey, it's not like you MAGA suckers, don't just show up looking [B][i]"stupid", "foolish""[/i][/B] and just [I][b]"weaklings",[/b][/I] after years of your MAGA Fuhrer, repeatedly telling you this. I don't need to do a thing.
But really, perhaps you should take your own advice and read up when it is by law appropriate to use deadly force.
Again, is it any wonder that Admiral Alvin Holsey [I][b](a veteran of over some 37 yrs),[/b][/I] wanted no part of these murderous illegal deadly force boat strikes and said as much to Pete Hegseth? And somehow you think Hegseth, [U]who's been Sec. Def. for all of 5-minutes[/U], knows more than the honorable vets, with +37 years of service? If so, you need to spend less time in Trumpland and more time, on how to be less gullible!
Like I said, your MAGA Fuhrer and the shit-show admin, tell so many freakin' LIES, are we too believe them when the call all the people in these boats drug traffickers, since they've provided no evidence as such and some reports have them murdering civilians in those boats, not even heading for America at all!
Since your MAGA strike team murders, have provided no evidence they were drug runners, why would I assume they were. And even if they were, it still murde! Just like you and I, they have the right to due process!
-
I say again!
The dam is breaking, as this lying traitor who now feels free to start telling the truth acknowledges:
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/16/politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-dam-breaking-republican-party-trump[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3042494]For all your rants on Bill Gates, when did anyone with an once of renewable, clean energy and green environmental savvy ever turn to Bill Gates, as an expert person for that intelligent knowledge space?[/QUOTE]God, you are factually challenged. "How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need" is a 2021 book by Bill Gates that outlines a comprehensive plan to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 to prevent a climate catastrophe.
Four years later, and Gates has totally changed his mind.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3042494]So while you pose a interesting question, that takes "the race to AI success" and boil it down to a two-horse race, between the USA And China, based of electricity prices, unfortunately not buying into your premise that electricity prices, even close to being a key factor, let alone a mitigating factor. I think your argument is weak and flawed.[/QUOTE]And here we go again with your personalizing an argument versus my restating the opinions of others. You do this literally with if not every post then every other post.
[URL]https://www.foxbusiness.com/energy/americas-ai-dominance-depends-winning-power-race-against-china-energy-expert-warns[/URL]
[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/markledain/2025/10/27/the-ai-race-is-an-energy-race-and-regions-with-gas-are-winning/[/URL]
[URL]https://ig.ft.com/ai-power/[/URL]
Huang Says AI's Growth Hinges On Solving The Energy Crunch.
In an episode of "The Joe Rogan Experience," Huang said the rapid expansion of AI is running headfirst into a new kind of limitation: power.
When Rogan asked whether energy has become the biggest hurdle for AI, Huang didn't hesitate. "It's the bottleneck," he said, highlighting that the availability of electricity, not the availability of GPUs, will determine how far and fast the industry can scale.
Go to the 3:52 mark here and you can see why wind and solar do not work with AI data centers: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpEEDnV1gXw[/URL].
At the beginning of this video, Zeihan said everyone was in agreement with what needs to be done. I repeat everyone but you and Algore.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3042512]Thanks again impart to President Joe Biden's IRA Clean Energy bill initiatives. And best of all no moronic unnecessary "Drill-Baby-Drill", thanks to clean green renewable energy out-of-the-box thinking. I would even venture to image, it even has, residential block and community based heating applications or possibly heating their buildings.
P.S BTW, Bill Gates is a major contributor and backer to this clean green energy company. As far as I'm concerned with Bill Gates, I'll let his millions in clean green investments do the talking![/QUOTE]This is what I mean. You just see what you want. Bill Gates' Microsoft and its data centers will be powered by coal. Trump knows oil and gas are not going to be what powers data centers. That is why Gates backed off his zero carbon climate change bullshit and drill baby drill is irrelevant. You are way late in your thinking again.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3042512]And good luck charging your car battery (lead-ion??) Every day. Have you thought about a heat pump and a Li-ion batter power station?
Sorry but I'm unable to follow your train of thought. Do you want to debate the adv/disadv of solar/batteries?[/QUOTE]Of course, you cannot follow. You are stuck on Biden good, solar good, lithium good, fossil fuel bad. It is why Tiny and Subcommander gave up on you.
The cost of a solar powered system using batteries and a heat pump is in the range of $2000 to $5000 installed and the batteries add hundreds of pounds to the weight of the RV. All the other methods (lead acid batteries, propane heat, electric heat with a generator burning gasoline, propane, or diesel) run at most for $2 a night.
Ah yes, but solar is free right and carbon neutral? No, you are burning more fossil fuel when you carry all that battery weight and once your batteries are exhausted if there is no sun, you have to go to shore power, plugging in a power cord, which is mostly generated via carbon sources. That is why carbon neutral is a fucking pipe dream.
I get the dream. You have an electric all wheel drive RV running on solar and battery. You can be cut off from the world and go wherever you want free from city sewage, water pipes, power lines, and internet cables.
And that is all it is, a dream because the batteries are just not good enough to compensate for when the wind stops blowing or the sun stops shining. The tech is just not there.
The irony is the carbon neutral vehicle that can be completely self-contained does exist. It is called a nuclear sub.
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3042594]Your sentiments were shared by former presidential candidate Herman Cain who is no longer with us. At the end of day was it worth it to not wear the mask?[/QUOTE]Unbelievable. You Dems learn nothing.
A 2023 Cochrane review found that wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza or SARS-CoV-2 infections.
[URL]https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.30.25321421v4[/URL]
Among 53402 employees, 43920 (82.2%) were vaccinated by the end of the study. The cumulative incidence of influenza was similar for the vaccinated and unvaccinated states early, but over time the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.
[URL]https://www.healthline.com/health-news/common-nasal-spray-may-prevent-covid-19-study[/URL]#COVID-19-risk-Comparing-nasal-spray-vs-placebo.
Researchers say people using a common allergy nasal spray, azelastine, were 69% less likely to contract COVID-19.
Participants in the trial were also 71% less likely to catch the common cold than placebo users.
In a clinical trial of healthy adults, people who used azelastine nasal spray (Astepro, Astelin) regularly for nearly two months were significantly less likely to become infected with SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) compared to those who used a placebo.
The spray, widely available over-the-counter for allergic rhinitis (hay fever), also appeared to reduce some other respiratory infections, with only mild side effects reported. The findings were published online on September 2 in JAMA Internal MedicineTrusted Source.
This is global warming all over again. You got these so called "scientists" twisting themselves into pretzels justifying their POV when the data blows up in their faces. When the data went against them, these "scientists" played the name game and changed global warming to climate change and changed the definition of a vaccine with Covid. And just like with global warming and Covid, the population will turn on these so called "scientists" once a critical mass of people see how they have been led off a cliff.
There is never any Democrats asking questions like, "Hey, Fauci, why weren't you doing studies on therapeutics like azelastine during the pandemic when so many doctors like Malone and McCollough told you to? Why didn't you listen to them versus having them banned from social media? Was it because you and your NIH buddies wanted to cash in on your vaccines that quit working after six months?" The best case scenario is Fauci was stupid; the worst is he was corrupt. But you dumb Dems in your ignorance still worship him.
Yep, there is no doubt in the mind of Dems that masks and vaccines work despite what the data says.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;3037113]But for Barack Obama there never would have been the rise of MAGA and a Chump presidency, America's angry and fearful backlash to a man of color having served 8 successive years as president of the Republic and leader of the free world. Take our (white) country back again![/QUOTE]338 million Americans owe you a heart felt thank you for your filthy votes in 2008 and 2016 we wouldn't have Bad Orange Man w / o you!!
Bless Your Heart.
-
3 photos
This can't be happening. Trump said Trillions are flowing into America!
In addition to the utterly predictable crap Repub / Trump economic and jobs creation numbers, Trillions added to Trump's deficits with zero to show for it in the economy, the rising unemployment rate and inflation rate and 30 year mortgage rate, this has nothing but the usual disastrous Trump Shit-and-Die Touch outcome written all over it.
Oh well. We tried. Harris tried. Good luck with this:
[B]Trump tariffs: Small businesses take on high-rate loans to cover new costs[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/17/trump-trade-tariffs-business-loans.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]New tariffs imposed this year by President Donald Trump have increased operating costs for small businesses that have to pay the import duties.
Some of those companies are taking on loans with high interest rates to cover that cost.
I honestly feel the government is putting me out of business, said an owner of a New York toy company. The tariffs are anti-American Dream.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3042782]In addition to the utterly predictable crap Repub / Trump economic and jobs creation numbers, Trillions added to Trump's deficits with zero to show for it in the economy, the rising unemployment rate and inflation rate and 30 year mortgage rate, this has nothing but the usual disastrous Trump Shit-and-Die Touch outcome written all over it.
Oh well. We tried. Harris tried. Good luck with this:
[B]Trump tariffs: Small businesses take on high-rate loans to cover new costs[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/17/trump-trade-tariffs-business-loans.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL][/QUOTE]The very simple logic of Trump: Everything is good for me = Everything is good for everyone.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3042671]Good rant and truth be told, I did enjoy a good chuckle over your strawman arguments, but really, for all your barking about cocaine and fentanyl, it's tad bit funny, you still don't seem to understand [B]the basic concept of being lied to,[/B] by FOXY MUSE and your MAGA Fuhrer, about fentanyl coming out of Venezuela, when they're NOT! This matters, since fentanyl, distributed mainly out of Mexico and China, is what is being attributed to most drug deaths in America.
It's so hilarious, how you gullible MAGA suckers, again and again, buy into your MAGA Fuhrer's lies, corruption and pretexts, to whip-up support for an illegal attack on Venezuela, with some "narco terrorist" bullshit (just like the war on Iraq), for some personal vendetta and "Drill-Baby-Drill" unlawful and illegal capture of Venezuelan state oil and property. It's sad really!
Hey, it's not like you MAGA suckers, don't just show up looking [B][i]"stupid", "foolish""[/i][/B] and just [I][b]"weaklings",[/b][/I] after years of your MAGA Fuhrer, repeatedly telling you this. I don't need to do a thing.[/QUOTE]Ok, lets pretend there are no drug dealers in Venezuela LOL. Do you are agree with how Maduro has ran his nation? Do you consider him a dictator? How many millions of people have fled Venezuela in the last 10 years?
If you condone all the things Maduro has done, then what is the end game for Republicans? They are just using the USA Military to steal oil from Venezuela? Explain the logic behind your reasoning because it just doesn't make sense to me.
I see Maduro as a dictator who is just a step above Hitler. He has massively impoverished and ostricized an entire nation. He is using the military to stay in power at the expense of the people of his country. I see it no other way. I have no problem with the USA over throwing his regime and forcing Venezuela to play ball with the rest of the free world. The days of hermit nations have been over for centuries and a nation with one of the world's largest energy reserves is not going to hoard it's oil and starve it's people while a dictator lives like a billionaire and fights with the rest of the world. A few dead drug dealers used as a false flag attack is a small price to pay for cheaper global energy prices and freedom and a decent quality of life for the people of Venezuela. And for the record they were absolutely drug dealers poisoning Americans so the false flag attack isn't even necessary. But, I still would have no problem if the USA did pull a false flag attack to fight the evil regime of Maduro. The sickest man of the 21th century by far. Maybe Putin takes first, but its close.
[URL]https://www.unrefugees.org/emergencies/venezuela/[/URL]
7.7 million people have fled the country since 2015. Only a fucking paper thin skin snowflake baby back would support the Maduro regime. This is just another example of you favoring inhumane and illogical politics because a bully stole your lunch money once and you developed severe TDS. 7.7 million people fleeing the country clearly indicates Maduro needs to go. Put your politics aside and think as a human and have some compassion for a suffering nation of people. When Trump stated those comments about Reiner, I put politics aside because Trump is wrong and that rhetoric has no place for the Presidency. When those idiots ran through the white on Jan. 6, I immediately put politics aside to condemn their insane actions. I never see that from the TDS Dems like you though. Sick.
-
Agreed electricity is a bottleneck, but not key to "winning the AI race"
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042743]God, you are factually challenged. "How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need" is a 2021 book by Bill Gates that outlines a comprehensive plan to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 to prevent a climate catastrophe.
Four years later, and Gates has totally changed his mind.[/QUOTE]Thanks for proving my point! You seem to be the only person that thinks Bill Gates, is an astute savvy intellectual on clean energy and green environmental issues, just because he wrote [B]a book[/B] on it.
Dude, get back to me when he's written over 15 books on the subject like Bill McKibben, or over 50 books like David Suzuki, and is internationally recognized as one of the top intellectual minds in the industry.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042743]And here we go again with your personalizing an argument versus my restating the opinions of others. You do this literally with if not every post then every other post.[/QUOTE]Oh brother! Once again, do I have to explain to you and others. That this is a debate! Your suppose to think for yourself and provide your opinions, facts and evidence and as well as those of others. But most importantly, you substantiate what you claim and not just provide baseless nonsense.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042743]Go to the 3:52 mark here and you can see why wind and solar do not work with AI data centers: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IpEEDnV1gXw[/URL]
At the beginning of this video, Zeihan said everyone was in agreement with what needs to be done. I repeat everyone but you and Algore.[/QUOTE]Tell that to China, whose grid just reached 62% renewables!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042743]This is what I mean. You just see what you want. Bill Gates' Microsoft and its data centers will be powered by coal. Trump knows oil and gas are not going to be what powers data centers. That is why Gates backed off his zero carbon climate change bullshit and drill baby drill is irrelevant. You are way late in your thinking again.[/QUOTE]If [NOPARSE]under the current U.S. shit-show admin they want to power AI and data centers, with fossil fuels, then I like a said GOOD LUCK with that! Fossil fuels will no doubt be needed. I just like where the EU and China are, with their much higher energy mix ratio of renewables on their grids.
So while I'd rather see the U.S. provide more clean efficient electricity for AI/data centers, but if using fossil fuels makes more economic sense or you just have not other choice, then do what ya gotta do. As will China, I suspect. Although I'm betting China's clean/dirty electricity ratio and renewables scales of economy, will be better economically due to the fact they are further along with electrification of their [/NOPARSE]grid.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042743][URL]https://www.foxbusiness.com/energy/americas-ai-dominance-depends-winning-power-race-against-china-energy-expert-warns[/URL]
[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/markledain/2025/10/27/the-ai-race-is-an-energy-race-and-regions-with-gas-are-winning/[/URL]
[URL]https://ig.ft.com/ai-power/[/URL]
Huang Says AI's Growth Hinges On Solving The Energy Crunch.
In an episode of "The Joe Rogan Experience," Huang said the rapid expansion of AI is running headfirst into a new kind of limitation: power.
When Rogan asked whether energy has become the biggest hurdle for AI, Huang didn't hesitate. "It's the bottleneck," he said, highlighting that the availability of electricity, not the availability of GPUs, will determine how far and fast the industry can scale. [/QUOTE][B]Note[/B] how funny these articles just reek and scream of Oil & Gas, and are obviously written or funded by the fossil fuel industry.
AGAIN, while you think [U]electricity is the key[/U] to "winning the AI race", I DO NOT! Here why:
Just like Jensen Huang, I agree, the amount of electricity AI and data centers need, [I][b]"It's a bottleneck".[/b][/I] Or in other words, an impediment towards entering into, advanced AI development. But not "the key factor" for "winning" the AI race.
Dude, if you've read enough on AI and data centers, you'd realize or know, [B]what else[/B] is "a Bottleneck"? [B]...WATER![/B] So does that mean fresh water is key to "winning the AI race"? Or just like electricity, it's simply an impediment to entry, into AI race. [URL]https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/data-centers-and-water-consumption[/URL].
So if your entering the "AI race", you should think about, the security of your electricity and water needs, [I][b]...as the paid, up front "entrance fees",[/b][/I] for being in the race. That's it, they both should be considered as prerequisites! As there are other key factors that best determine, "who will win!
Yes, I think it is the key to entering and staying in the race, without first securing sufficient energy resources like funding, electricity and water (like most technology these days), AI development grinds to a halt. But all players in the "AI race", will have secured these resources / contracts prior to entering the race.
[B]Bottom Line:[/B] What you fail to realize, when posing your AI race question (when I rejected the premise), is that "winning the AI race", will mean different things, to different people. Ergo, is it any wonder why the fossil fuel industry, would love to frame it as, an "energy race"?
[B]P.S: [/B]BTW, [NOPARSE]for the winner(s), what does "winning the AI race", suppose to look like? The one with the most electricity generation? How will we know who's [/NOPARSE]won?
-
Better formed questions, make for better formed answers!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042743]Of course, you cannot follow. You are stuck on Biden good, solar good, lithium good, fossil fuel bad. [/QUOTE]I follow just fine thank you, if the person posing the question, knows how to properly frame a question.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042743]It is why Tiny and Subcommander gave up on you. [/QUOTE]Not sure what that has to do with anything, but that's funny, since from my POV, I'd thought they'd given up on YOU! [NOPARSE] Don't worry Elvis 2008, I haven't given up on you...YET![/NOPARSE].
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042743]The cost of a solar powered system using batteries and a heat pump is in the range of $2000 to $5000 installed and the batteries add hundreds of pounds to the weight of the RV. All the other methods (lead acid batteries, propane heat, electric heat with a generator burning gasoline, propane, or diesel) run at most for $2 a night. [/QUOTE]Congratulations [NOPARSE]you've solved your problem then for a supposed $2/night? I'll do you one better, use an electric blanket for less than $0.50/nigh[/NOPARSE]t!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042743]Ah yes, but solar is free right and carbon neutral? No, you are burning more fossil fuel when you carry all that battery weight and once your batteries are exhausted if there is no sun, you have to go to shore power, plugging in a power cord, which is mostly generated via carbon sources. That is why carbon neutral is a fucking pipe dream.
I get the dream. You have an electric all wheel drive RV running on solar and battery. You can be cut off from the world and go wherever you want free from city sewage, water pipes, power lines, and internet cables.
And that is all it is, a dream because the batteries are just not good enough to compensate for when the wind stops blowing or the sun stops shining. The tech is just not there.
The irony is the carbon neutral vehicle that can be completely self-contained does exist. It is called a nuclear sub.[/QUOTE]So, am I [NOPARSE]to assume from that rant, solar doesn't work for you? That's okay, a RV solar/battery set up doesn't work for everyone, or within everyone's [/NOPARSE]budget.
It's okay, nothing wrong with sticking with fossil fuels! You do you, dude! What's important is, you stay nice and warm at nights!
But really, if you want more accurate answers or informational responses to your questions, that are related more to YOUR SPECIFIC circumstances, then you need to be more intentional with your questions.
What I'm saying is, I don't read minds! So unless YOU take the time to state your RV parameters, specifications, RV details or budgetary restrictions, to the question or problem (or any other), how would I know what solutions to present as viable, given your specific situation?
Check out YouTuber, [B]JerryRigEverything[/B] and the RV solar set he installed on his friend's RV, here:[B]EASIEST Off Grid RV Solar Power... just like a little Lego[/B] [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO23RTRIVGU[/URL] This is probably [NOPARSE]nothing like your setup, but I present it, as an example of what can be done, where solar/batteries are the primary energy source and propane/gas generator is used as [/NOPARSE]backup.
So, if you want better answers, the onus is on you, [B]to better frame the question or the problem properly![/B].
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3042876]But really, if you want more accurate answers or informational responses to your questions, that are related more to YOUR SPECIFIC circumstances, then you need to be more intentional with your questions.[/QUOTE]My parameters are not interesting. Everyone's parameters are what is important. For me, AC not heat is the most important. I can heat up the RV using the engine, using propane, using a space heater with lead acid batteries being charged by an alternator and solar. The AC is much more problematic. I will have access to shore power most of the time, but shore power will not run the AC. For that, I have to turn on the generator. Any problem with the generator and I am screwed.
If I wanted a cost effective AC unit, I would have a power station with a 48 volt battery connection hooked up to shore power or solar. Solar power is direct current. The most cost effective AC unit is 48 volts, but it is not the most powerful AC unit, and I want all in.
The two most powerful AC units are the Furron Chill Cube and the Ecopower Gree. I chose the Gree because it does heat as well. These units are quiet, energy efficient, and can get a RV down to 65 degrees in 100 degree heat. I equipped it with a soft starter, and I will be running it totally on its own via a power station with added batteries if need be. I should have access to shore power and can charge the power station via shore power. I will be adding solar though as the ultimate backup but just in case I do not have access to shore power. This is a thousand dollar backup plan that most people would do without.
That is my situation, and most people would just live with propane heat and generator AC as it is so much cheaper than what I am going to do.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3042876]This is probably nothing like your setup, but I present it, as an example of what can be done, where solar/batteries are the primary energy source and propane/gas generator is used as backup.[/QUOTE]And I assume you like these guys think this is awesome? These guys seem to be impressed with themselves. "Everyone else I talk to that has solar they're like, oh you could run it max like one hour.
12:45 maybe two. " First off, these guys did not get a more efficient and quieter unit. They did not get an AC unit that runs on direct current nor did the get an A / see soft starter. Had they done so, they likely would have doubled the time their A / see could run.
Still, let's do a cost comparison as politically that is all that matters. These guys got 1,000 watts of solar power. They added on huge amounts of weight with all their equipment and still have a generator backup. Their system, which they got for free, costs $3500 and you would add in another few grand in installation fees.
In comparison, a generator does between 3000 and 4000 watts and costs dollars a day to run. And granted these guys are in Idaho, but what good is 9 hours of AC when it is 100 degrees out?
Unless you turn everything off and are peak sunny hours, you are much more likely to use shore power to charge your batteries, and shore power is half fossil fuels. Yes, you have solar AC for 9 hours and the other 15 are fossil fuel driven. Chances are that $5000 you are paying for "free energy" is going to end up being much more expensive than generator power.
So solar energy is not good for data centers, and it has zero chance of being carbon free generation. Solar makes sense in a few places. If the power goes out, and I have my solar panels with battery backup, I am probably going to be good until the power comes on.
But the reason their AC was on for more than an hour was not due to solar power. The gains were made via cheaper mass produced batteries and more efficient AC units. The battery cost was like 10 X this a few years ago.
Solar and wind are still more expensive than natural gas and coal, [URL]https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=63485[/URL] although there may be some sunny and windy places where that is not true, but you Democrats with the Biden plan pushed solar and wind down everyone's throat when you said the planet was going to end if fossil fuels were used.
You guys even pushed it in New England, [URL]https://energybadboys.substack.com/p/wind-and-solar-up-to-12-times-more[/URL] "The true cost of wind and solar energy in New England is not competitive with that of natural gas. This is especially true for offshore wind, which, according to our modeling, will be twelve times more expensive than combined cycle (CC) natural gas in the region. This week we're going to show how the all-in cost of wind and solar energy in New England will be anywhere from six to twelve times more expensive in 2050 than the cost of existing natural gas when accounting for the cost of maintaining reliability. ".
That is stupid, and Germany was doing the same thing. Germany was doing solar while China is burning cheap coal, and the idiotic German government said that was okay, and you think what Germany is doing is great.
It just blows me away how binary you Dems are: solar good, fossil fuels bad, masks good, ivermectin bad, Biden angel, Trump devil. Dems have zero and I mean zero cost-benefit analysis skills.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3042782]In addition to the utterly predictable crap Repub / Trump economic and jobs creation numbers, Trillions added to Trump's deficits with zero to show for it in the economy, the rising unemployment rate and inflation rate and 30 year mortgage rate, this has nothing but the usual disastrous Trump Shit-and-Die Touch outcome written all over it.[/QUOTE]The first time I noticed where politics really mattered was driving. I left Chicago and entered Indiana. The roads changed from pothole ridden hell holes that signaled the apocalypse was near to smooth as silk pavement. I shook my head and thought, "Why does poor Indiana have better roads than rich Chicago?" I saw the same when traveling from NYC to New Jersey. NJ's roads were good. NYC's roads were hell, and this was like 20 years ago. I doubt things have changed.
I got a chance to see a part of the country. The RV I bought was in Utah. The Salt Lake City airport was newly added on to, massive, and so clean you could eat off the floor. I remember the American Idol crew going to Utah and saying how nice the people were, and I saw the same thing. People seemed friendly and happy. I was there decades ago and the city has grown like a weed.
Buying the RV was a snap. I was in and out of the dealer in like 20 minutes and then I hit the road. I did not notice it at the time but the roads were good. I wanted to go South as quickly as I could on my route back to Texas so even though google told me to go through Colorado, I headed South for Alberquerque. Still, I was in Colorado for an hour and noticed immediately the roads went down in quality not Indiana to Chicago bad, maybe half of that.
Then I hit New Mexico and I am shocked I did not blow a tire. Utah to New Mexico was Indiana to Chicago bad. I did hit a few decent roads, but New Mexico was the pits. And then came Texas and the roads went back to being smooth as silk. Were these shitty roads really due to Colorado and New Mexico being blue states?
I pulled into the amazing Buccee's store in Amarillo, Texas. Now that is an interesting story of a great Texas entrepreneur, but anyway, I looked at how much the gas cost and did a double take, [URL]https://www.gasbuddy.com/station/212232[/URL]
Gas is $1.86 per gallon there.
I talked to a friend of mine who was just in California. He confirmed the roads in San Diego were shit too, and said the gas was nearly $5 a gallon. Gas Buddy shows a decent price is $4. 55 in the San Diego area. [URL]https://www.gasbuddy.com/gasprices/california/la-jolla[/URL]
Now there are some regional reasons for the difference in prices but the big one as everyone knows is taxes. Thing is everyone knows what is going on. The California pols are taking the gasoline tax money and paying people to vote for them and neglecting their roads. I am sure Texas has its own version of that, but it is nowhere near as bad.
If people saw the roads and gas prices / taxes like I did, the Democrats would not get one fucking vote in an election. Not one. That is why they have to lie and demonize Republicans and Trump. They want to scare people so badly as to not to believe their own eyes.
-
Lmmfao
[URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/a-secret-that-the-dnc-must-never-reveal-why-they-lost-the-2024-elections/[/URL]
-
3 photos
Lolol
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042951]The first time I noticed where politics really mattered was driving. I left Chicago and entered Indiana. The roads changed from pothole ridden hell holes...
.
........
I talked to a friend of mine who was just in California. He confirmed the roads in San Diego were shit too, and said the gas was nearly $5 a gallon. Gas Buddy shows a decent price is $4. 55 in the San Diego area. [URL]https://www.gasbuddy.com/gasprices/california/la-jolla[/URL]
Now there are some regional reasons for the difference in prices but the big one as everyone knows is taxes. [B]Thing is everyone knows what is going on. The California pols are taking the gasoline tax money and paying people to vote for them and neglecting their roads.[/b] I am sure Texas has its own version of that, but it is nowhere near as bad.
If people saw the roads and gas prices / taxes like I did, the Democrats would not get one fucking vote in an election. Not one. That is why they have to lie and demonize Republicans and Trump. They want to scare people so badly as to not to believe their own eyes.[/QUOTE]Says the Repub cult follower whose lord and savior is once again proposing that Congress send tax-funded emergency welfare checks out to voters with his name on them so as to ease some of the pain that his typical Repub crap economic policy and stewardship results have caused America. And do it in a hurry before next year's midterm elections hand his Party its ass and thereby puts an end to at least some of that pain.
Uh. If every American was offered a job in San Diego that afforded them a beach-side home in San Diego, La Jolla or any number of those beach-side neighborhoods, most of them would pack up Granny, Jethro, Elle May and the rocking chair and drive their pick-up through 1000 miles of potholes to get the hell out of Hootervile and Dead Man's Gulch to get to it.
-
3 photos
The reason is obvious; BLS officials don't want to be fired.
The instant Trump tried to publicly humiliate and then fired the BLS official who dared to report the accurate Trump crap jobs or inflation numbers, the game changed for him and other Repub so-called presidents forever; from that moment on any good, "just ok" numbers like these or bad numbers reported must necessarily be assumed to have been doctored and massaged to appear much better than they really are.
[B]Trust these numbers? Economists see a lot of flaws in delayed CPI report[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/18/trust-these-numbers-economists-see-a-lot-of-flaws-in-delayed-cpi-report-showing-downward-inflation.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Economists are viewing the delayed November consumer price index report with a dose of skepticism.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the annual headline inflation rate and core CPI rate for last month were 2.7% and 2.6%, respectively, well below expectations.
A chief point of concern is the way housing inflation was calculated, specifically the owners equivalent rent figure for November.[/QUOTE]As a fortunate landlord in a desirable neighborhood of a highly desirable Greater Metropolitan Blue City Area in a highly desirable Great Blue State, I can assure you rents increased a hell of a lot more than 3% in October, November and for all of 2025 vs 2024. But unless BLS officials are granted total immunity from attacks and retribution by Repub so-called presidents who insist that all jobs and inflation reports be doctored and massaged in order to make them look much, much better than they really are under their policies and stewardship, no economist, investor or project director can rely on a thing they report when a Repub is in the White House.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3043004]Says the Repub cult follower whose lord and savior is once again proposing that Congress send tax-funded emergency welfare checks out to voters with his name on them so as to ease some of the pain that his typical Repub crap economic policy and stewardship results have caused America. And do it in a hurry before next year's midterm elections hand his Party its ass and thereby puts an end to at least some of that pain.[/QUOTE]Typical Democrat. You cannot even admit it is wrong. All you losers ever say is, "Well, you guys do it too!" My new definition of a loser is someone who does something terrible and points to someone else and says, "But he is worse!" Yeesh.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3043004]Uh. If every American was offered a job in San Diego that afforded them a beach-side home in San Diego, La Jolla or any number of those beach-side neighborhoods, most of them would pack up Granny, Jethro, Elle May and the rocking chair and drive their pick-up through 1000 miles of potholes to get the hell out of Hootervile and Dead Man's Gulch to get to it.[/QUOTE]Man, talk about your California cockiness right there and from a guy living in Thailand. You are such a hypocrite and a foolish one at that. This American has been to Amarillo, San Diego, and driven from Tijuana down to Ensanada. Amarillo sits near the 7 milllion BPD Permian basin oil region. The world's beef prices are set in nearby Hereford. Milk production in the region would rank third nationally and that region is #1 in the world in cotton production. And the city, the largest in has just 200,000 residents. It is fucking drenched with money.
A guy in Amarillo making $100 k a year can buy a home and save money. For San Diego, a $100 k is like a living wage. You cannot afford a home there or save any money making that in San Diego.
Ah, but Elvis, you are missing the climate, the quality of life in San Diego. Oh, fuck that! An oceanside condo in San Diego will run you $3 million. Once you cross the border and go to nearby Roasarito on the Mexican side, the condos cost 10% of that, and I think the food, quality of life, roads and beauty are nicer in Rosarito and Baja than San Diego.
Hell, on the way down, you can stop at Hong Kong in Tijuana and bang a 10 for $150. If you can find a 10 type in San Diego, that too will cost you 10 X that amount of Baja and if she consents and gets paid and later feels badly about having sex with you, she can accuse you of rape. That is the California justice system for you.
Every American would rather split time and work in Amarillo and play in Baja than live in the homeless infested, overpriced, poorly kept up, taxed to death shit hole that is San Diego. Or rather every American who has been to these places.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
-
Democrats despise the truth
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3042989][URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/a-secret-that-the-dnc-must-never-reveal-why-they-lost-the-2024-elections/[/URL][/QUOTE]I can tell you the summery of the report.
"The American people really really hate Democrats" at least those of us with a brain and a soul.
-
No shame sticking to fossil fuels! You do you
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042941]My parameters are not interesting. Everyone's parameters are what is important. For me, AC not heat is the most important. I can heat up the RV using the engine, using propane, using a space heater with lead acid batteries being charged by an alternator and solar. The AC is much more problematic. I will have access to shore power most of the time, but shore power will not run the AC. For that, I have to turn on the generator. Any problem with the generator and I am screwed.
If I wanted a cost effective AC unit, I would have a power station with a 48 volt battery connection hooked up to shore power or solar. Solar power is direct current. The most cost effective AC unit is 48 volts, but it is not the most powerful AC unit, [b]and I want all in.[/b][/QUOTE]It's to [NOPARSE]bad you can't get a solar/battery and AC configuration to work for you, at the price point you want. But there's no shame that, if sticking with fossil fuels for power generation works for you and battery weight is problematic. But make no mistake about it, there are plenty of RVers (and YouTubers making it work, just fine for them), that are boondocking on solar/battery/AC systems, more than 80-90% (and some 100%) of the time [/NOPARSE]off gird, with minimal to very little shore power usage.
They [NOPARSE]may have slightly bigger budgets than you, for their RV solar/battery/AC setups, but again, you never specified any budgetary constraints when you posed your question. And since you're always bragging and portraying [/NOPARSE]yourself [B]as the "Paycheck Superhero",[/B] so why would I assume, you couldn't afford such a RV setup?
[B]For example,[/B] with a setup of 1200 w of solar, 2 x 300 Ah Epoch Lithium Batteries, 3000 w Victron (AC to DC) Inverter, AC soft start kit, the YouTuber "SolarPowerMyRV" (Denver, CO), gives a real world RV example of running your AC unit off solar and ask the question, can RV Air Conditioner run on Solar Power? [B]Real World Demo (2:22 min)[/B] [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLgiXVnbQBs[/URL], Mar 21,2025. With no battery weight issues, at all!
Not sure of the costs associated with "SolarPowerMyRV"'s setup was, but in other DIY RVers videos (ie. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6G-CWFRJq2k[/URL], We Attempted to DIY an [NOPARSE]RV Solar System with TILTING Panels (Cost Details!) 1,800w solar -- $14.5 K setup), yes the cost can be prohibitive, but these boondockers, all seem to say, in the end, it was worth it, and that the system paid for itself, as most are living off-grid (or without shore power), again, 80-90% of the [/NOPARSE]time.
Finally, many RVers, always seem come around and say, on of the same two (2) things. 1) wish I'd done solar sooner or 2) wish I'd put in more solar, if they started out small.
So if you're serious about [B]"...I want all in."[/B] it look like you're going to have to fork out some coin!
-
Solar and Wind are Cheapest and Taxpayers on the hook, for Fuhrer's failured Polices!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042941]So solar energy is not good for data centers, and it has zero chance of being carbon free generation. Solar makes sense in a few places.[/QUOTE]Again, [NOPARSE]tell that to China, with a 62% renewables grid. China's grid maybe not be a totally fossil free grid...yet, but just like South Australia that are now at 78% renewables grid, both have efforts and planning in place, that move them in the right direction of the flexible and resilient energy grids of tomorrow.
The U.S. electricity grids (under MAGA) not so much, although going backwards, [/NOPARSE]is a direction!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3042941]Solar and wind are still more expensive than natural gas and coal, [URL]https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=63485[/URL] although there may be some sunny and windy places where that is not true, but you Democrats with the Biden plan pushed solar and wind down everyone's throat when you said the planet was going to end if fossil fuels were used.[/QUOTE]Nice try, [NOPARSE] but that old U.S. EIA report from 2024, you are trying to pawn-off as recent data/info as the current cheapest sources energy, isn't going to cut-it. But it was a nice try!
Here are 2025 update reports on Solar and Wind, being the cheapest forms of energy:
1) In its 2025 energy outlook, the U.S. EIA found the cost of electricity generated from natural gas was $48.78 to $64.55 per megawatt hour to produce compared with $88.16 for [/NOPARSE]offshore wind, [B]$29.58 for onshore wind and $31.86 for solar.[/B] Aug. 25,2025 [URL]https://spectrumlocalnews.com/us/snplus/environment/2025/08/25/are-wind-and-solar-responsible-for-higher-electricity-prices[/URL].
2) 91% of New Renewable Projects Now Cheaper Than Fossil Fuels Alternatives, 22 July, 2025 [URL]https://www.irena.org/News/pressreleases/2025/Jul/91-Percent-of-New-Renewable-Projects-Now-Cheaper-Than-Fossil-Fuels-Alternatives[/URL] The IRENA data shows, the cost advantage for new solar and wind is not marginal, but often by a whooping 40-50%.
3) Solar Now the World's Cheapest Energy, Powering the Clean Transition, October 9, 2025 [URL]https://carboncredits.com/solar-now-the-worlds-cheapest-energy-powering-the-clean-transition/[/URL] Solar [NOPARSE]energy has officially claimed the title of the world’s most affordable source of electricity. According to new research from the University of Surrey’s Advanced Technology Institute (ATI), solar power now costs as little as Ł0.02 per kilowatt-hour in the sunniest [/NOPARSE]regions.
And why TAXPAYERS will be the only ones paying the cost, the MAGA Fuhrer's failed energy policies, for money losing coal mines, just like our $40 bn right-wing welfare to farmers:
4) The [NOPARSE]U.S. Department of Energy is keeping unprofitable coal power plants alive despite massive financial losses, citing grid reliability and energy security. $3.1bn annual cost estimated for fossil fuel plants DOE won’t allow to retire. One coal plant owner reported it spent $29 million in the first 38 days of an Energy Department order to keep it online. Aug. 14, 2025 • Updated Aug. 18, [/NOPARSE]2025 [URL]https://www.utilitydive.com/news/doe-mandate-fossil-fueled-power-plants-emergency/757653/[/URL]
-
I'm really proud EU and also big thanks to Canada and Norway, keep on big support to so courageous Ukrainians, with 90 billions more, versus criminal Putin, not sucking him like MAGA USA.
-
What does Granny Clampett and the MAGA Fuhrer have in Common?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3043004]Says the Repub cult follower whose lord and savior is once again proposing that Congress send tax-funded emergency welfare checks out to voters with his name on them so as to ease some of the pain that his typical Repub crap economic policy and stewardship results have caused America. And do it in a hurry before next year's midterm elections hand his Party its ass and thereby puts an end to at least some of that pain.
Uh. If every American was offered a job in San Diego that afforded them a beach-side home in San Diego, La Jolla or any number of those beach-side neighborhoods, [b]most of them would pack up Granny, Jethro, Elle May and the rocking chair and drive their pick-up through 1000 miles of potholes to get the hell out of Hootervile and Dead Man's Gulch to get to it.[/b][/QUOTE]Funny Stuff! Thanks for the belly ache, laughs and chuckles, on that great blast from the past 60's TV show, The Beverly Hillbillies, anecdotal reference. I got to admit, the show was a perennial favorite in our household growing up. You should have heard the laughter from my dad, while he'd be watching the show. [NOPARSE]Of course Granny Clampett, was his favorite character.
Yeah, god trip down memory line, albeit rendered through the lens of a 1000 miles of potholes...nevertheless, thank[/NOPARSE]s!
But speaking of knee-slapping, good ol' country blithering senile old grannies, that once TV shows, what the hell kinda year-end speech, to address the nation, what that last night from the MAGA Fuhrer?
I mean, all anyone heard, was BIDEN, BIDEN, BIDEN for 20-minutes! I guess in Trumpland parlance, it must sound an awful lot like, [B]the senile MAGA Fuhrer is suffering from BDS![/B]
-
2 photos
Yep. Nailed it.
So the BLS officials got to keep their job as long as they put out the BS numbers that help make Trump look like less of a total numbskull failure came out first to give him his BS soundbite and talking point. Similar to when Trump's Lying AG Bill Barr jumped out in front of the Russia Russia Russia Mueller Investigation Report and lie about what that actually discovered.
[B]NY Fed's Williams says some 'technical factors' distorted November's CPI reading[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/19/ny-fed-president-williams-says-some-technical-factors-distorted-novembers-cpi-reading-downward.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]"There were some special factors of practical factors that really are related to the fact that they werent able to collect date in October and not in the first half of November, Williams said.
And because of that, I think the data were distorted in some of the categories, and that pushed down the CPI reading, probably by a tenth or so, Williams said on CNBCs Squawk Box.[/QUOTE]Oh, BTW, even with the BS about CPI being 2.7%/2. 6%, Trump and his America-hating cult followers are out there claiming those rates of inflation are "the lowest in 4 years"!
Uh. Nope. See the link and the screenshot of the chart below.
Even their BS numbers are no lower than the CPI was just last year around this same time under Joe Biden. Which was demonstrative proof it had declined dramatically from the Trump's Pandemic Rate of Inflation peak while Trump's current BS numbers made up to make him look better is demonstrative proof the rate of inflation has not declined at all since he took office. Obviously, the real rate was higher year-over-year.
[B]Consumer Price Index - October 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_11132024.pdf[/URL]
[QUOTE]Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 2.6% before seasonal adjustment.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043043] In its 2025 energy outlook, the U.S. EIA found the cost of electricity generated from natural gas was $48.78 to $64.55 per megawatt hour to produce compared with $88.16 for offshore wind, $29.58 for onshore wind and $31.86 for solar. Aug. 25,2025
2) 91% of New Renewable Projects Now Cheaper Than Fossil Fuels Alternatives, 22 July, 2025. The IRENA data shows, the cost advantage for new solar and wind is not marginal, but often by a whooping 40-50%
LOL Thanks for proving my point. If wind is "cheaper" then why is it more offshore? Better yet, given its costs, why are you even doing it?[/QUOTE]And your point on 2025 is what? Alternative energy was cheaper for one year. Does that mean they will be next year too? So you mean windmills, solar panels, oil, natural gas, natural gas turbines, and uranium are all going to stay fixed in price forever? You are doing the dumbshit Democratic shuffle, green good, fossil fuel bad. It is much more complicated than that. In fact, I bet you cannot even state my position. You probably think I am 100% totally drill, baby, drill and green energy bad. That is all your binary brain can comprehend.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043043]The U.S. electricity grids (under MAGA) not so much, although going backwards, is a direction![/QUOTE]More binary brain.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043043]Again, tell that to China, with a 62% renewables grid. China's grid maybe not be a totally fossil free grid,[/QUOTE]And even more. That China has to import coal and oil while the USA does not has no meaning to your binary brain.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043043]It's to bad you can't get a solar/battery and AC configuration to work for you, at the price point you want.[/QUOTE]That is the exact opposite of what happened.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043043]But there's no shame that, if sticking with fossil fuels for power generation works for you and battery weight is problematic.[/QUOTE]Right, my batteries weigh more than other peoples.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043043]But make no mistake about it, there are plenty of RVers (and YouTubers making it work, just fine for them), that are boondocking on solar/battery/AC systems, more than 80-90% (and some 100%) of the time off gird, with minimal to very little shore power usage.[/QUOTE]LOL. We watched different videos. What I saw were guys generating 1,000 watts of power and their one refigerator used 70% of that power at peak sun. So, tell me, Spidy, how are these 80 to 100% of people getting by being off grid and at night? Are they going without AC or refigerators and if so, then what the hell is the point of a RV?
Your 80 to 100% number is pure bullshit. It is more of the same. When your binary brain fails, you just make shit up.
It is probably worthless in saying what I did because you read what you want. I had this great deal on a Tiffin RV. It is based on a Mercedes chassis that gets 15 mpg on average. What you do not get is I was determined to have two AC units and have one run off grid. I read all about AC units, power stations, solar panels, and I figured I could do it for ten grand. Now that was just for one AC unit to be free of shore power. My system blew the fuck out of those guys in your video, and like those guys, person after person said you need a generator for AC.
Thing is the Tiffin had a OCCC, Occupant and Cargo Carrying Capacity (OCCC) of six hundred pounds. That meant the RV could carry either my AC unit or me but not both, and that is with nothing else in the RV. And I weigh 220 lbs thank you very much.
The Winnebago had a 1,000 lbs of OCCC. Now I can carry two people and my AC uit and nothing else.
I am in Texas. The AC unit was more important than anything else so I researched more and went with the gas powered Ford chassis. OCCC on the RV I got is 2500 lbs, and I am going to put in my off grid AC unit as carrying capacity is no longer a real concern.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043043]So if you're serious about "...I want all in." it look like you're going to have to fork out some coin![/QUOTE]The Ford was half the price of the Mercedes. The cost is not there. Instead of getting 15 MPG though, I get 8 MPG. And this is what your binary brain cannot comprehend. To have an off grid AC unit meant MORE fossil fuels not less.
In my case, it would have been much more cost effective to get a bigger generator than a solar AC system. Thing is generators have to be maintained, break down, and are very loud. I was willing to pay more for batteries and solar to just be done with it. Still, it is going to be several hundreds pounds of batteries and equipment to run one AC unit 24/7 off of solar and even then when there is little sun, I will have to plug in to fossil fuel geneated shore power.
The generator needed to run two AC units is 5500 watts, and it can run 24/7 regardless of weather and power every electrical item in the RV. In comparison, in your video, those goofballs were bragging about 1000 watts of power at peak sun, which is about 4 hours per day, and they were trying to run everythng off of it which is completely bird brained.
If you can get a 4,000 watt battery that weighs ten pounds versus the 100 or so pounds it weighs now, then solar RVs make total sense. That solar powered RVs make no sense right now is something you just cannot get.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043043]Again, [NOPARSE]tell that to China, with a 62% renewables grid. China's grid maybe not be a totally fossil free grid...yet, but just like South Australia that are now at 78% renewables grid, both have efforts and planning in place, that move them in the right direction of the flexible and resilient energy grids of tomorrow.
The U.S. electricity grids (under MAGA) not so much, although going backwards, [/NOPARSE]is a direction!
Nice try, [NOPARSE] but that old U.S. EIA report from 2024, you are trying to pawn-off as recent data/info as the current cheapest sources energy, isn't going to cut-it. But it was a nice try!
Here are 2025 update reports on Solar and Wind, being the cheapest forms of energy:
1) In its 2025 energy outlook, the U.S. EIA found the cost of electricity generated from natural gas was $48.78 to $64.55 per megawatt hour to produce compared with $88.16 for [/NOPARSE]offshore wind, [B]$29.58 for onshore wind and $31.86 for solar.[/B] Aug. 25,2025 [URL]https://spectrumlocalnews.com/us/snplus/environment/2025/08/25/are-wind-and-solar-responsible-for-higher-electricity-prices[/URL].[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043043] And why TAXPAYERS will be the only ones paying the cost, the MAGA Fuhrer's failed energy policies, for money losing coal mines, just like our $40 bn right-wing welfare to farmers[/QUOTE]As I just showed in my RV example, the one size fits all electrical model is silly. The government forces utilities to charge on a per kilowatt basis. That makes no sense. If you are solar based, electricty generation is going to cost more at night. With wind, there is less demand at night. A dynamic pricing model would push the consumer to have their own power stations. You charge your power station during the day when solar is cheaper or at night when the decrease in demand would make wind cheaper. There is no incentive for personal power stations when you have fixed per killowatt pricing. There likely would be times and places where it is more cost effective for people to generate their own electricity via solar or wind than rely on their utility.
That you are married to your petrostate and electrostate model is more binary thinking, and one that is not cost effective to boot. The state does not need to control everything with electricity.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043043]Again, [NOPARSE]tell that to China, with a 62% renewables grid. China's grid maybe not be a totally fossil free grid...yet, but just like South Australia that are now at 78% renewables grid, both have efforts and planning in place, that move them in the right direction of the flexible and resilient energy grids of tomorrow.
The U.S. electricity grids (under MAGA) not so much, although going backwards, [/NOPARSE]is a direction!
Nice try, [NOPARSE] but that old U.S. EIA report from 2024, you are trying to pawn-off as recent data/info as the current cheapest sources energy, isn't going to cut-it. But it was a nice try!
Here are 2025 update reports on Solar and Wind, being the cheapest forms of energy:
1) In its 2025 energy outlook, the U.S. EIA found the cost of electricity generated from natural gas was $48.78 to $64.55 per megawatt hour to produce compared with $88.16 for [/NOPARSE]offshore wind, [B]$29.58 for onshore wind and $31.86 for solar.[/B] Aug. 25,2025 [URL]https://spectrumlocalnews.com/us/snplus/environment/2025/08/25/are-wind-and-solar-responsible-for-higher-electricity-prices[/URL].
2) 91% of New Renewable Projects Now Cheaper Than Fossil Fuels Alternatives, 22 July, 2025 [URL]https://www.irena.org/News/pressreleases/2025/Jul/91-Percent-of-New-Renewable-Projects-Now-Cheaper-Than-Fossil-Fuels-Alternatives[/URL] The IRENA data shows, the cost advantage for new solar and wind is not marginal, but often by a whooping 40-50%.[/QUOTE]Nope, Nuclear is cheapest and cleanest, and will greatly improve in the next decade or so. Solar and Wind is only effective in the right environment and takes up a massive amount of land. They wanted Wind Farms off the coast of New Jersey, Jersey said fuck off, massive waste of space and more expensive than the Nuclear plants we already have. Same thing with those solar roofs. Yea it knocks a few bucks off your bill, but the money you save off electricity will be added on to your insurance bill and it weakens your roof permanently from all the drilling into the rafters. Will be lucky if those roofs last 50 years before need reinforcement braces. And the worse part is it kills the value of your home and destroys resale value. Word is out on the solar scam and people don't want sky high insurance bills just to be green. Fuck Solar.
-
The many reasons for Trump's blithering Biden Biden Biden
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043066]Funny Stuff! Thanks for the belly ache, laughs and chuckles, on that great blast from the past 60's TV show, The Beverly Hillbillies, anecdotal reference. I got to admit, the show was a perennial favorite in our household growing up. You should have heard the laughter from my dad, while he'd be watching the show. [NOPARSE]Of course Granny Clampett, was his favorite character.
Yeah, god trip down memory line, albeit rendered through the lens of a 1000 miles of potholes...nevertheless, thank[/NOPARSE]s!
But speaking of knee-slapping, good ol' country blithering senile old grannies, that once TV shows, what the hell kinda year-end speech, to address the nation, what that last night from the MAGA Fuhrer?
I mean, all anyone heard, was BIDEN, BIDEN, BIDEN for 20-minutes! I guess in Trumpland parlance, it must sound an awful lot like, [B]the senile MAGA Fuhrer is suffering from BDS![/B][/QUOTE]Trump is hoping to have us focus on his fantasy that Biden's positive economic and national security results didn't and will not forever blow away his and every other Repub's horrific negative results. He does that as a constant distraction tactic for when, for instance, his latest grand and glorious announcement about drug-makers agreeing to lower their prices hadn't already been negotiated and accomplished for the vast majority of Americans who need those drugs in President Joe Biden's brilliant Inflation Reduction Act set to take effect more fully in 2026:
[B]Negotiated Prices Take Effect for Ten Drugs in 2026.
October 9, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.medicarerights.org/medicare-watch/2025/10/09/negotiated-prices-take-effect-for-ten-drugs-in-2026[/URL]
[QUOTE]The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 created a new ability for Medicare to negotiate prices for the most expensive drugs the program covers. The first set of negotiated drug prices will go into effect in 2026 and are estimated to save $1.5 billion in annual out-of-pocket costs for Medicare beneficiaries while saving the Medicare program $6 billion per year. The negotiated prices are a minimum of 38% off the 2023 list price.[/QUOTE]LOL. Oh look! Which is also after Trump jumped in with one of his first BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN distraction tactics by eliminating some of the drug price reductions President Joe Biden had already effected on "day one" of his 2nd disastrous presidential term:
[B]Trump Reverses Some Biden Drug Pricing Initiatives, Potentially Impacting Medicare Costs.[/B]
[URL]https://www.ajmc.com/view/trump-reverses-some-biden-drug-pricing-initiatives-potentially-impacting-medicare-costs[/URL]
[QUOTE]President Donald J. Trumps second-term health care agenda is taking shape with a clear focus on undoing several Biden-era policies.1 On Inauguration Day, January 20, 2025, Trump signed an executive order reversing initiatives aimed at reducing prescription drug costs for Medicare and Medicaid recipients, expanding the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and increasing protections for Medicaid enrollees.[/QUOTE]Lolol. So Liar Trump gets to. Waddle over to the nearest podium and virtually without one word of pushback and clarification by the lazy typically pro Repub Mainstream Media announce some blithering BS about how he saved America from higher drug prices after he rescinded BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN's accomplishment to dramatically lower drug prices for most American customers for those drugs and then take credit for future drug price reductions already negotiated and put into BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN's Inflation Reduction. Act to take effect in about 3 weeks anyway! Lolol.
Oh, except this time the MSM will stand in stoney silence while total numbskull Trump tells them he reduced drug prices by "400%, 500% and even 600%.
Lolol. Can't beat that. Well, unless you reduce the prices by "700% of course.
-
Stop the presses, cheap nuclear power, extra, extra!
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3043119]Nope, Nuclear is cheapest and cleanest, and will greatly improve in the next decade or so. Solar and Wind is only effective in the right environment and takes up a massive amount of land. They wanted Wind Farms off the coast of New Jersey, Jersey said fuck off, massive waste of space and more expensive than the Nuclear plants we already have.[/QUOTE]Less lip service and [B]more facts, data and information[/B] that actually backups your idiotic nonsense. Can't wait to see the facts and evidence for cheap nuclear power?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3043119]Same thing with those solar roofs. Yea it knocks a few bucks off your bill, but the money you save off electricity will be added on to your insurance bill and it weakens your roof permanently from all the drilling into the rafters. Will be lucky if those roofs last 50 years before need reinforcement braces. And the worse part is it kills the value of your home and destroys resale value. Word is out on the solar scam and people don't want sky high insurance bills just to be green. Fuck Solar.[/QUOTE]Tell that to the 7% of homes in the USA With rooftop solar. [URL]https://seia.org/solar-installations/[/URL] Or the +4-million households in Australia with rooftop solar. [URL]https://www.energy.gov.au/news/australia-hits-rooftop-solar-milestone[/URL]
Like I said above, less lip service and [B]more facts, data and information[/B] that actually backups your idiotic nonsense. It's easy to flap your gums, but provide real facts why don't ya, so readers can sink there teeth into some real factual information and not just baseless opinions.
-
Again, no shame sticking with fossil fuels, don't sweat it!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3043090]Right, my batteries weigh more than other peoples.[/QUOTE]I donno, you tell me!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3043090]LOL. We watched different videos. What I saw were guys generating 1,000 watts of power and their one refigerator used 70% of that power at peak sun. So, tell me, Spidy, how are these 80 to 100% of people getting by being off grid and at night? Are they going without AC or refigerators and if so, then what the hell is the point of a RV?
Your 80 to 100% number is pure bullshit. It is more of the same. When your binary brain fails, you just make shit up.[/QUOTE]Dude, [B]don't hate,[/B] just because others can boondock 80-90% of the time (and 100% in some cases) and it works for them. Not everyone does RVing the same way!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3043090]It is probably worthless in saying what I did because you read what you want. ...
The Winnebago had a 1,000 lbs of OCCC. Now I can carry two people and my AC uit and nothing else. ...
I am in Texas. The AC unit was more important than anything else so I researched more and went with the gas powered Ford chassis. OCCC on the RV I got is 2500 lbs, and I am going to put in my off grid AC unit as carrying capacity is no longer a real concern. ...
... That solar powered RVs make no sense right now is something you just cannot get.[/QUOTE]Dude, [NOPARSE]you've already made up you mind solar and batteries aren't going to work for you,...so don't sweat it.
Like I said, there is no shame, in sticking to fossil [/NOPARSE]fuels!
-
Duh! It's 2025 not 2024
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3043090]And your point on 2025 is what? [/QUOTE]Duh, can you be anymore dense! The point is, it's Dec 2025 (not July 2024) and the cheapest energy new builds, is solar and wind. Perhaps you're still living in 2024, most of rest of us, are not. Or is the concept of updated data and information, not mean anything to MAGA suckers!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3043090]Alternative energy was cheaper for one year. Does that mean they will be next year too? So you mean windmills, solar panels, oil, natural gas, natural gas turbines, and uranium are all going to stay fixed in price forever?[/QUOTE]Dunno, maybe? I think maybe they will for near-to-mid term distant future! But, you can always make similar dumbass assumptions again, in a year from now, if you're really that ignorant?
So far, all I hear is more lip service. Why is it MAGA suckers, are all just so good at lip service? But not so much when it comes to proof. Where's your evidence it won't be the cheapest?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3043090] You are doing the dumbshit Democratic shuffle, green good, fossil fuel bad. It is much more complicated than that. In fact, I bet you cannot even state my position. You probably think I am 100% totally drill, baby, drill and green energy bad. [/QUOTE][QUOTE=Elvis2008;3043090]And even more. That China has to import coal and oil while the USA does not [/QUOTE]Totally understandable, considering for decades now, most of the world has offloaded manufacturing to China, and made them the manufacturer to the world.
Consider it a necessary part of their manufacturing economy, so that spoiled privileged westerners (like yourself), can still get their cheap $1000 iPhones.
[U]Solar and Wind is Cheaper than Fossil Fuels:[/U]
Based on recent industry reports, solar and wind are not only the cheapest new build energy sources as of today, but also have a strong economic trajectory and look to maintain their cost leadership in the future. [U]Multiple analyses from financial and energy research institutions confirm this outlook.[/U]. [B]91% of New Renewable Projects Now Cheaper Than Fossil Fuels Alternatives,[/B] Jul 2025. [URL]https://www.irena.org/News/pressreleases/2025/Jul/91-Percent-of-New-Renewable-Projects-Now-Cheaper-Than-Fossil-Fuels-Alternatives[/URL].
Less LIP SERVICE and factual information and analysis!
-
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3043119]Nope, Nuclear is cheapest and cleanest...[/QUOTE]Just to be clear, the debate is referring to the cheapest new project energy source builds.
-
Sure, if it works for you! Go for it!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3043092]As I just showed in my RV example, the one size fits all electrical model is silly. The government forces utilities to charge on a per kilowatt basis. That makes no sense. If you are solar based, electricty generation is going to cost more at night. With wind, there is less demand at night. A dynamic pricing model would push the consumer to have their own power stations. You charge your power station during the day when solar is cheaper or at night when the decrease in demand would make wind cheaper. There is no incentive for personal power stations when you have fixed per killowatt pricing. There likely would be times and places where it is more cost effective for people to generate their own electricity via solar or wind than rely on their utility. [QUOTE]Sure, if you say so! But why not, if it works for you!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3043092]That you are married to your petrostate and electrostate model is more binary thinking, and one that is not cost effective to boot. [be]The state[ / be] does not need to control everything with electricity. [/QUOTE] Clearly you've yet to grasp the concept of [be]Electrostate vs. Petrostate[ / be] That okay too!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043198]Less lip service and [B]more facts, data and information[/B] that actually backups your idiotic nonsense. Can't wait to see the facts and evidence for cheap nuclear power?
Tell that to the 7% of homes in the USA With rooftop solar. [URL]https://seia.org/solar-installations/[/URL] Or the +4-million households in Australia with rooftop solar. [URL]https://www.energy.gov.au/news/australia-hits-rooftop-solar-milestone[/URL]
Like I said above, less lip service and [B]more facts, data and information[/B] that actually backups your idiotic nonsense. It's easy to flap your gums, but provide real facts why don't ya, so readers can sink there teeth into some real factual information and not just baseless opinions.[/QUOTE][URL]https://energy.sustainability-directory.com/learn/how-much-land-area-is-required-for-a-nuclear-power-plant-compared-to-a-solar-or-wind-farm-of-equivalent-capacity/[/URL]
On average, for every square mile of nuclear energy out put or roughly the size of a standard nuclear plant, THREE HUNDRED SQAURE MILES OF LAND IS NEEDED FOR WIND! 300! I don't need to post links, although I will for you because your too fucking lazy to research shit that you constantly claim to be an expert on, because I live in New Jersey and we just spent years fighting against wind farms off our shores. Jersey shore is essential to the New Jersey economy and they are trying to destroy it by placing senseless costly wind farms on our coastal areas when we can just stick with Nuclear which is cheaper and far cleaner and doesn't take up massive amounts of area.
This renewable energy bullshit is a slimy fucking scam from Liberals to take over the energy sector and then use that as leverage to control the masses. They have already done it with media. As anyone over 10 years old who can read the internet and knows how to use google already knows, the clear answer is Nuclear. There is no debate, it is completely unnecessary for 90% of the renewable energy sources out there.
Fight this green new deal scam bull shit and do what makes logical sense. Nuclear. Shut the fuck up with this electro state bull shit!
Oh, and you never responded on Maduro and Venezuela. Typical.
-
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3043119]Nope, Nuclear is cheapest and cleanest, and will greatly improve in the next decade or so. Solar and Wind is only effective in the right environment and takes up a massive amount of land.[/QUOTE]Yeah, that is the part Spidy does not get. Using a power station and portable solar panels will probably pay for themselves in a year or two if you live in Arizona. If you live in the Midwest or East Coast, they are a complete fucking waste of money, and that is where the Dems look so stupid.
It is the same with electric cars. They are great for places with nice climates. When you go below freezing, you run into all kind of problems.
And for them, that is the part that is crazy. Reducing carbon based pollution makes sense. Saying you are going to get rid of in 30 years means you are out of your fucking mind and promoting China as a model on pollution, as Spidy has done, means you need to be put in an institution. These are not rational people; they are acting like they are in a cult.
And when these cult guys run out of facts, they just start making stuff up and engaging in the name calling. Spidy just shows a video where guys are bragging about solar powering a frig for six hours and that people are "boondocking" for days a time unplugged from the grid. How do you unplug from the grid where your fridge works for six hours at a time? His response is, "But yeah, they are doing it. "
Yes, there are now RVs without generators and loaded with batteries, and solar contributes some to their charging but you saw how little solar really does. The reality is that you charge the batteries via the alternator on your engine, more fossil fuels, or plugging into the grid, more fossil fuels. He just wants to believe that you can do a pure solar / electric RV when it does not exist.
I wasn't kidding when I said the only large carbon free vehicle is a nuclear sub, and we have had that technology for decades. What makes nuclear subs special is they do not have to surface for fuel for months, and you can therefore hide them much longer that subs burning fossil fuels. I get the political issues but if not for security issues, nuclear powered engines and RVs would make a helluva lot of sense.
I am just so sick of the whiplash the Dems have had with power generation my whole life. First, it was no nukes, no nukes. All the reactors were going to melt down and contaminate the planet. At the time, the reduction in nukes meant more coal. Then a decade or two later, all carbon based energy production was going to destroy the planet. Thanks to oil companies and shale drilling, much cleaner natural gas was substituted for coal and pollution went way down, but that was not good enough for the Dems. We asked, "Okay, Dems, if carbon based power generation is bad, then are nukes good now?" They would not answer the question. They just pushed for solar and wind.
I guess in Spidy's world he does not get that billionaires fund science projects that justify what they want. So when a guy like Bill Gates who is funding anti-carbon based energy generation flip flops, it is not one guy changing his mind. He is going to pay scientific experts to agree with him. Simplistically, the huge energy producer Texas is a red state. The big tech companies are in California, a blue state. So if you are a Dem, screwing up the profits of energy companies was good politics until now.
Now tech needs energy badly. If Microsoft does not have the power to generate its AI ventures, their stock will be crushed, and Bill Gates will lose billions. That is the obvious reason Bill Gates backed off his carbon based emissions will destroy the planet rhetoric and said "Hey, guys, that book I wrote about burning carbon ending the planet, just kidding!
So now we need huge amounts of electricity for data centers. First, you have to overcome the Spidy types who are going to say, "Well, gee, duh, why can't we use solar and wind?" and educate them on why that will not work. Nautral gas would be great but the supply chain is overloaded which leaves coal and nuclear.
My bet is that if you put 10 smart people in a room and gave them the choice between nuclear and coal, they would all pick nuclear. Thing is we have seen this movie before. Even when carbon based energy was going to wipe out the planet, I think there was only one new nuclear power plant built. Nuclear power is the most regulated industry in the country and the bureaucrats within that system wield the power to stop or slow down any project and there is little doubt in my mind, they will do just that.
So after all the Dems whining about nukes and meltdown, CO2 and global warming then CO2 and climate change, we are going to be left with the most polluting, dirty way to produce energy for the data centers AKA coal, and the one thing you can count on is the Dems will not own that they were wrong.
We just saw it was the mask fiasco with Covid. Fauci made up the maks and social distancing rules. They were not based on any science at all. Here is a headline and article on that very subject, [URL]https://torontosun.com/news/world/dr-anthony-fauci-admits-he-made-up-covids-social-distancing-measures-masking-rules[/URL].
And we just saw a Dem on here saying masks worked. He could read this news story and listen to Fauci's testimony, and my bet is that he still would not change his mind.
-
Occams razor is at play here
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3043279]Yeah, that is the part Spidy does not get. Using a power station and portable solar panels will probably pay for themselves in a year or two if you live in Arizona. If you live in the Midwest or East Coast, they are a complete fucking waste of money, and that is where the Dems look so stupid.
It is the same with electric cars. They are great for places with nice climates. When you go below freezing, you run into all kind of problems.
And for them, that is the part that is crazy. Reducing carbon based pollution makes sense. Saying you are going to get rid of in 30 years means you are out of your fucking mind and promoting China as a model on pollution, as Spidy has done, means you need to be put in an institution. These are not rational people; they are acting like they are in a cult.
And when these cult guys run out of facts, they just start making stuff up and engaging in the name calling. Spidy just shows a video where guys are bragging about solar powering a frig for six hours and that people are "boondocking" for days a time unplugged from the grid. How do you unplug from the grid where your fridge works for six hours at a time?.[/QUOTE]Change his mind LMFAO its not about that, they know they're wrong they just will never admit it, why? Because once you take your finger out of that dykes shit hole (Madcow) , they will be overwhelmed.
With more requests to admit they're wrong 24/7, why? Because they're always wrong. So their low self esteem MO is to never admit you're wrong.
Move along nothing to see here folks.
I fault you a bit for trying to reason with this fool, your discussions look like you're arguing with some mentally ill homeless bum on the subway.
None of these pathological lying cucksters have ANY credibility on anything here, because even when they're wrong and they know it, they won't admit it.
-
I'm not into Bowling but I see the quintessential Trump 7-10 split coming
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/gunboat-diplomacy-accelerated-us-reportedly-interdicts-seizes-another-oil-tanker[/URL]
Long Live The Monroe Doctrine.
Allahu Akbar.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3043279]Yeah, that is the part Spidy does not get. Using a power station and portable solar panels will probably pay for themselves in a year or two if you live in Arizona. If you live in the Midwest or East Coast, they are a complete fucking waste of money, and that is where the Dems look so stupid.
It is the same with electric cars. They are great for places with nice climates. When you go below freezing, you run into all kind of problems.
And for them, that is the part that is crazy. Reducing carbon based pollution makes sense. Saying you are going to get rid of in 30 years means you are out of your fucking mind and promoting China as a model on pollution, as Spidy has done, means you need to be put in an institution. These are not rational people; they are acting like they are in a cult.
And when these cult guys run out of facts, they just start making stuff up and engaging in the name calling. Spidy just shows a video where guys are bragging about solar powering a frig for six hours and that people are "boondocking" for days a time unplugged from the grid. How do you unplug from the grid where your fridge works for six hours at a time? His response is, "But yeah, they are doing it. "
Yes, there are now RVs without generators and loaded with batteries, and solar contributes some to their charging but you saw how little solar really does. The reality is that you charge the batteries via the alternator on your engine, more fossil fuels, or plugging into the grid, more fossil fuels. He just wants to believe that you can do a pure solar / electric RV when it does not exist..[/QUOTE]Your post was very well articulated. These are the types of posts I trust because you can tell when reading the writer has study this subject and speaks from experience rather than just finding some left wing article with skewed statistics to prove a point and fulfill a political agenda.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Since when is "Land Area" the LCOE?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3043240][URL]https://energy.sustainability-directory.com/learn/how-much-land-area-is-required-for-a-nuclear-power-plant-compared-to-a-solar-or-wind-farm-of-equivalent-capacity/[/URL]
On average, for every square mile of nuclear energy out put or roughly the size of a standard nuclear plant, THREE HUNDRED SQAURE MILES OF LAND IS NEEDED FOR WIND! 300! [/QUOTE]Chuckles and more chuckles, as once again you prove, that you are incapable of even understanding the simplicity of question being debated.
What [NOPARSE]a fuckin' joke you are, when provide a very brief blob of article, that briefly talks about land efficiency and "How much land area nuclear vs solar & wind, is required". There is no mention of industry using this as the lowest cost of energy? Just freakin' hilarious, ..."land area"? ..."land [/NOPARSE]area"?
Since when do energy projects that are consider all forms of energy generation, to determine the lowest cost of producing energy, use "land area" as the determining factor?
Get back to me, when you have [U]a real answer[/U] to the debate question proposed? [I][b]What is currently (2025) the lowest cost of energy? [/b][/I].
-
MAGA Speak!
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3043308]Your post was very well articulated. These are the types of posts I trust because you can tell when reading the writer has study this subject and speaks from experience rather than just finding some left wing article with skewed statistics to prove a point and fulfill a political agenda.[/QUOTE]Why am [NOPARSE] I not surprised you understand Elvis 2008's Gish Gallop...Chuckles!...It like you're all speaking another foreign language, all your own. ie. MAGA [/NOPARSE]Speak!
-
When Nuclear takes 10 to 43 years to build, is it still the lowest cost of energy?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3043240][URL]https://energy.sustainability-directory.com/learn/how-much-land-area-is-required-for-a-nuclear-power-plant-compared-to-a-solar-or-wind-farm-of-equivalent-capacity/[/URL] [/QUOTE]BTW, Why [NOPARSE]doesn't your so called article on "low cost of energy", consider or factor in the the time of build/constru[/NOPARSE]ction?
The last nuclear plants in the USA The Vogtle Unit 4 and Vogtle Unit 3, both took just over 10 years to build. The last one before those nuclear plants, [B]the Watts Bar Unit, took a whopping 43 years to build.[/B] That's [NOPARSE]almost a freakin' half a century of what? Wasted energy? Ineptitude? Cost overruns? Compliance? MAGA like stoppage/sab[/NOPARSE]otage?
On average solar farms in the USA Take 8 to 18 months to build. Wind farms, about 6-months to 3 years, on average depending on scale.
-
Old fat orange is totally megaloman and senile making USA mostly ridiculous in front of the world.
-
Waiting in the on deck circle CDMX
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3043305][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/gunboat-diplomacy-accelerated-us-reportedly-interdicts-seizes-another-oil-tanker[/URL]
Long Live The Monroe Doctrine..[/QUOTE]Waiting in the on deck circle is CDMX.
[URL]https://www.npr.org/2025/11/15/nx-s1-5608991/mexicos-new-generation-takes-to-the-streets-accusing-leaders-of-protecting-cartels[/URL]
-
Bums seldom differ?
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3043304]I fault you a bit for trying to reason with this fool, your discussions look like you're arguing with some mentally ill homeless bum on the subway.[/QUOTE]LOL! Yeah, no doubt, that's where you get your so called debating skills from.
-
MAGA infighting explodes at Convention of 'frauds', 'charlatans' and 'grifters'!
Speaking of arguing (or fighting) like bums on the subway.
Who better [NOPARSE] than the QAnon/MAGA/Repubs at a convention to portray such a grotesque and unruly sight. What a fiasco, as all the key MAGA faithless, lined up for a knuckle-dragging, knock-down and out [/NOPARSE]fight. [B]MAGA infighting erupts at Turning Point USA Conference,[/B] Dec 18,2025. [URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2025/12/18/maga-infighting-erupts-at-day-one-of-turning-point-usa-conference-00699665[/URL].
At the Turning Point USA Conference, civil war breaks out, as tensions explode as on the opening night, commentator Ben Shapiro launched a blistering attack from the stage, labeling fellow media personalities Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, and Megyn Kelly as [B]"frauds and grifters"[/B] and [B]"charlatans"[/B] [I]{...BTW, wait till Ben Shapiro, finds out that the corruption rots from the head, like stinking fish. I bet his own head is gonna explode! Chuckles!}[/I].
Needless to say, it was another shit-show with the feud escalating over the next subsequent days, as epithets, insults, slurs, slander and smear campaign attacks, took over the convention, meant supposedly to celebrate Charlie Kirk. [I]{...But, what an odd way to celebrate/honor Charlie Kirk? Or was it an homage?...}[/I].
Well, it couldn't have happened to a nicer group of MAGA people!
-
The ART of Slapping your name on stuff
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3043127]Trump is hoping to have us focus on his fantasy that Biden's positive economic and national security results didn't and will not forever blow away his and every other Repub's horrific negative results. He does that as a constant distraction tactic for when, for instance, his latest grand and glorious announcement about drug-makers agreeing to lower their prices hadn't already been negotiated and accomplished for the vast majority of Americans who need those drugs in President Joe Biden's brilliant Inflation Reduction Act set to take effect more fully in 2026:
[B]Negotiated Prices Take Effect for Ten Drugs in 2026.
October 9, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.medicarerights.org/medicare-watch/2025/10/09/negotiated-prices-take-effect-for-ten-drugs-in-2026[/URL]
LOL. Oh look! Which is also after Trump jumped in with one of his first BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN distraction tactics by eliminating some of the drug price reductions President Joe Biden had already effected on "day one" of his 2nd disastrous presidential term:
[B]Trump Reverses Some Biden Drug Pricing Initiatives, Potentially Impacting Medicare Costs.[/B].[/QUOTE]Man you nailed it! I mean that pretty much sums up the MAGA Fuhrer, in a nutshell. Never earned a god damn thing in his lifetime.
But really, that's been his shtick, since birth. Just slap you name on anything that's not nailed down and call it yours. Take the latest "desecration" at Kennedy Center and the WH East Wing before that. [B]Trump Ignores Law and Sticks His Name on Kennedy Center,[/B] Dec 19th, 2025, [URL]https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-ignores-law-and-sticks-his-name-on-kennedy-center/[/URL].
The MAGA Fuhrer's narcissism heading in to the 2026 elections, I'm sure will serve him well. Especially as he continues to lie and tell Americans, the economy is great, and that the "affordability" issues and the higher prices at the "groceries (a word he created)" stores, they're experiencing, is all just a Dem hoax!
-
Typical!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043612]BTW, Why [NOPARSE]doesn't your so called article on "low cost of energy", consider or factor in the the time of build/constru[/NOPARSE]ction?
The last nuclear plants in the USA The Vogtle Unit 4 and Vogtle Unit 3, both took just over 10 years to build. The last one before those nuclear plants, [B]the Watts Bar Unit, took a whopping 43 years to build.[/B] That's [NOPARSE]almost a freakin' half a century of what? Wasted energy? Ineptitude? Cost overruns? Compliance? MAGA like stoppage/sab[/NOPARSE]otage?
On average solar farms in the USA Take 8 to 18 months to build. Wind farms, about 6-months to 3 years, on average depending on scale.[/QUOTE]Nuclear plants on average take 5-8 years to construct. That is a bargain when you consider how reliable, clean, and cheap the energy is and the small footprint. The big problem with wind is the gear box and turbines only last seven years on average. So yes they can be constructed quicker, but they have to be replaced every seven years. I love how you conveniently leave that out. 18 months to build and it only last seven years and it doesn't even provide constant energy and the footprint takes up hundreds of square miles, it just makes no sense. Well unless you have a political agenda to drive up energy prices to financially trap people to make them dependent on the state and you want to rule with a totalitarian regime that locks its people down. Then wind and solar make perfect sense LOL!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043604]Chuckles and more chuckles, as once again you prove, that you are incapable of even understanding the simplicity of question being debated.
What [NOPARSE]a fuckin' joke you are, when provide a very brief blob of article, that briefly talks about land efficiency and "How much land area nuclear vs solar & wind, is required". There is no mention of industry using this as the lowest cost of energy? Just freakin' hilarious, ..."land area"? ..."land [/NOPARSE]area"?
Since when do energy projects that are consider all forms of energy generation, to determine the lowest cost of producing energy, use "land area" as the determining factor?
Get back to me, when you have [U]a real answer[/U] to the debate question proposed? [I][b]What is currently (2025) the lowest cost of energy? [/b][/I].[/QUOTE]Your a lefty and your supposed to care about the environment, but you clearly don't when it gets in the way of the Green New Scam the lunatic Democrats are trying to fuck over America with. You delusional little man, please listen. "Land Area" is extremely important to the local environment. As I stated before, go research what happened in New Jersey and how they were going to destroy our coasts with wind farms and destroy the habits for all the flora and fauna that live there. Go look up all the dead whales that washed up on our beaches when they started this shit. Go look up how much maintenence the farms would need and how much extra oil run off goes in the water from the boats maintaining the turbines. Its an absolute nightmare and it would have destroyed thousands of square miles of pristine shore line in the name of green energy when we don't even need it. Don't be angry you were so dumb to believe and back this scam, try to do the right thing and preserve what little natural environments we have left. New Jersey is a deep blue state and even New Jersey wanted nothing to do with thousands and thousands of acres of wind turbines off our beaches. Let the people decide what they want and don't force your political agenda on them because you bullied back in the day and you hate the world.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043612]BTW, Why [NOPARSE]doesn't your so called article on "low cost of energy", consider or factor in the the time of build/constru[/NOPARSE]ction?
The last nuclear plants in the USA The Vogtle Unit 4 and Vogtle Unit 3, both took just over 10 years to build. The last one before those nuclear plants, [B]the Watts Bar Unit, took a whopping 43 years to build.[/B] That's [NOPARSE]almost a freakin' half a century of what? Wasted energy? Ineptitude? Cost overruns? Compliance? MAGA like stoppage/sab[/NOPARSE]otage?
On average solar farms in the USA Take 8 to 18 months to build. Wind farms, about 6-months to 3 years, on average depending on scale.[/QUOTE]7-11 years according to this article.
[URL]https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/our-activity/offshore-wind-energy/offshore-wind-park-construction[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043685]Man you nailed it! I mean that pretty much sums up the MAGA Fuhrer, in a nutshell. Never earned a god damn thing in his lifetime.
But really, that's been his shtick, since birth. Just slap you name on anything that's not nailed down and call it yours. Take the latest "desecration" at Kennedy Center and the WH East Wing before that. [B]Trump Ignores Law and Sticks His Name on Kennedy Center,[/B] Dec 19th, 2025, [URL]https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-ignores-law-and-sticks-his-name-on-kennedy-center/[/URL].
The MAGA Fuhrer's narcissism heading in to the 2026 elections, I'm sure will serve him well. Especially as he continues to lie and tell Americans, the economy is great, and that the "affordability" issues and the higher prices at the "groceries (a word he created)" stores, they're experiencing, is all just a Dem hoax![/QUOTE]'affordability' XD.
Put tarifs to make america great again, then price are raising, people stop buying the expensive tarifed stuffs, less stuffs moving inside the country because people arent buying it because they are buying the less expenssive stuff, the demand for less expenssive stuff is going up so bo the price too, some stuffs are moving inside because the price are higher so it worth it but most of it don't because of the tarifs, eveything is now more expensive be cause of the 'affordability'.
God damn the 'affordability' for this mess!
-
My Favorite Democrat used to be FDR
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3043127]Trump is hoping to have us focus on his fantasy that Biden's positive economic and national security results didn't and will not forever blow away his and every other Repub's horrific negative results. He does that as a constant distraction tactic for when, for instance, his latest grand and glorious announcement about drug-makers agreeing to lower their prices hadn't already been negotiated and accomplished for the vast majority of Americans who need those drugs in President Joe Biden's brilliant Inflation Reduction Act set to take effect more fully in 2026:
[B]Negotiated Prices Take Effect for Ten Drugs in 2026.
October 9, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.medicarerights.org/medicare-watch/2025/10/09/negotiated-prices-take-effect-for-ten-drugs-in-2026[/URL]
LOL. Oh look! Which is also after Trump jumped in with one of his first BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN distraction tactics by eliminating some of the drug price reductions President Joe Biden had already effected on "day one" of his 2nd disastrous presidential term:
[B]Trump Reverses Some Biden Drug Pricing Initiatives, Potentially Impacting Medicare Costs.[/B]
[URL]https://www.ajmc.com/view/trump-reverses-some-biden-drug-pricing-initiatives-potentially-impacting-medicare-costs[/URL]
Lolol. So Liar Trump gets to. Waddle over to the nearest podium and virtually without one word of pushback and clarification by the lazy typically pro Repub Mainstream Media announce some blithering BS about how he saved America from higher drug prices after he rescinded BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN's accomplishment to dramatically lower drug prices for most American customers for those drugs and then take credit for future drug price reductions already negotiated and put into BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN's Inflation Reduction. Act to take effect in about 3 weeks anyway! Lolol.
Oh, except this time the MSM will stand in stoney silence while total numbskull Trump tells them he reduced drug prices by "400%, 500% and even 600%.
Lolol. Can't beat that. Well, unless you reduce the prices by "700% of course.[/QUOTE]Not anymore he's been superceded by a trio of Scumbags.
#1 is Scumbag Pelosi by lightyears in 2008 she rigged the primaries against Scumbag Bubba and handed it to Scumbag Barry which gave us Our Lord and Savior in 2016.
#2 is RBG, in 2016 Scumbag Barry asked her politely like the cuck he is to retire and she told him "ain't no house slave telling me what to do" LMAO.
In 2020 she finally kicked the bucket and gave Our Lord and Savior another sweet ass Supreme Court seat to make up the Trump Court.
#3 the oligarchs rigged the election in 2020 and handed it to (#3 Scumbag Joe and Scumbag Harris).
Only to have Scumbag Pelosi and Scumbag Barry force him out of the race in the summer of 2024 only for him to quickly and astutely hand the baton to Birdbrain Harris.
And the rest is history folks thank you for your votes, please vote for AOC in 2028 God only knows what serendipity she will send our way LMFAO.
Allahu Akbar!!
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/12/23/chuck-todd-joe-biden-did-a-ton-of-damage-to-the-democratic-brand-with-his-one-term/[/URL]
Post script hey you feminist Cucks what we really need in 2026 is more female Democrats in high office ROTFLMMFAO.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3043612]BTW, Why [NOPARSE]doesn't your so called article on "low cost of energy", consider or factor in the the time of build/constru[/NOPARSE]ction?
The last nuclear plants in the USA The Vogtle Unit 4 and Vogtle Unit 3, both took just over 10 years to build. The last one before those nuclear plants, [B]the Watts Bar Unit, took a whopping 43 years to build.[/B] That's [NOPARSE]almost a freakin' half a century of what? Wasted energy? Ineptitude? Cost overruns? Compliance? MAGA like stoppage/sab[/NOPARSE]otage?
On average solar farms in the USA Take 8 to 18 months to build. Wind farms, about 6-months to 3 years, on average depending on scale.[/QUOTE]It takes 7-11 years to construct off shore wind farms. Not 3 three years.
[URL]https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/our-activity/offshore-wind-energy/offshore-wind-park-construction[/URL]
-
Resistance is futile LMMFAO
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3043624]Old fat orange is totally megaloman and senile making USA mostly ridiculous in front of the world.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/12/23/louvre-tightens-security-installs-bars-on-infamous-window-of-crown-jewel-heist/[/URL]
Allahu Akbar.
-
3 photos
As usual, pro Repub bothsider Todd whiffs and misses it.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3043760]Not anymore he's been superceded by a trio of Scumbags.
#1 is Scumbag Pelosi by lightyears in 2008 she rigged the primaries against Scumbag Bubba and handed it to Scumbag Barry which gave us Our Lord and Savior in 2016.
#2 is RBG, in 2016 Scumbag Barry asked her politely like the cuck he is to retire and she told him "ain't no house slave telling me what to do" LMAO.
In 2020 she finally kicked the bucket and gave Our Lord and Savior another sweet ass Supreme Court seat to make up the Trump Court.[/QUOTE]Todd totally misses which single demographic and on what single issue swung from their usual Dem vote to a Repub vote in 2024, in the only 3 swing states that mattered and only by less than 0.75 of a single percentage point, thereby being solely responsible for Trump winning the election. And, yes, it was a vote "against" something; it was the angry Muslim votes "against" anyone from the Biden Administration in PA, MI and WI for its support of Israel in the Israel-Gaza War, which they extrapolated to being support for Netanyahu, who they hated.
It is no more complicated than that. No other typically Dem-voting demographic shift from Dem to Repub flipped a single typically Blue state from Harris to Trump. None. Only that one demographic in three swing states, the only three swing states that mattered, and only on that one non economic / non inflation / non immigration / non crime / non tranny / non "woke" issue, decided the presidential election outcome and only by a swing of less than 0. 75 of a single percentage point did it.
Meanwhile, Repubs lost House seats to the Dems in the 2024 election, have continued to lose more of them ever since and the only Senate seats won by Repubs was in 2-3 states that were Ruby Red to begin with.
Consequently, as your link shows, at least Todd mentioned the far more important factor in his usual pro-Repub / anti-Dem screed:
[QUOTE]"Youve got progressives who dont like the direction of the party, who are going to end up voting enthusiastically in the midterms against Republicans, but it doesnt mean they like what the Democrats are doing.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3043779][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/12/23/louvre-tightens-security-installs-bars-on-infamous-window-of-crown-jewel-heist/[/URL]
Allahu Akbar.[/QUOTE]I don t care about your too old, too fat orange megaloman still making his show, when criminal Putin makes fun of him since 1 year and Europe don t accept what accept Americans. I just wish he will fail to fuck courageous Ukrainians and Greenland, when he tries since 1 year to rob them. When US economics is falling, with USD and petrol rate falling, only way he knows is to rob others, as he did to become rich, not paying tax. A shameful guy putting shame more than MAGA on USA. I m proud Europe resist to him, when he is not king of the world, whatever Americans can have delirium, when only 5% population, but second after criminal China for pollution. Best way to stop Putin is to take Russia money and to isolate them till starvation, even only way to get rid of him. Best way to reduce pollution is not to buy Chinese and US, when both make 50% of pollution killing our planet. Almost double pollution per American compare to Europe where we build higher quality.
-
3 photos
It was a very good year, for Business Bankruptcies
No surprise, Trump's first year back with his typically disastrous Repub economic policies and stewardship was the worst year for American businesses since a previous Repub's anti-business policies and stewardship crashed the USA economy, destroyed thousands of businesses and wiped out millions of jobs.
Oh well. We tried.
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/12/27/corporate-bankruptcies-economy/[/URL]
[B]Bankruptcies Soar To 15-Year High Thanks To Trump's Tariffs.
Who could have possibly predicted that serial bankruptcy filer Donald Trump's tariff tantrums would trigger corporate bankruptcies to soar to a 15-year high in 2025?[/B]
[URL]https://crooksandliars.com/2025/12/trumps-tariffs-trigger-bankruptcies[/URL]
[QUOTE]Corporate bankruptcies surged in 2025, rivaling [b]levels not seen since the immediate aftermath of the Great Recession[/b], as import-dependent businesses absorbed the highest tariffs in decades.
At least 717 companies filed for bankruptcy through November, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence. Thats roughly 14 percent more than the same 11 months of 2024, and the highest tally since 2010.
Companies cited inflation and interest rates among the factors contributing to their financial challenges, as well as Trump administration trade policies that have disrupted supply chains and pushed up costs.[/QUOTE]
-
And keeping on supporting criminal Netanyahou. I really wish Israelis will wake up and get rid of their criminal. I don't need Clooney in my beloved little France, I don t want to pay tax for him and his family health protection, like too many Americans found this aim in France, when they don t have in claimed MAGA.
-
God please no we don't need French illegals too
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3044536]I don t care about your too old, too fat orange megaloman still making his show, when criminal Putin makes fun of him since 1 year and Europe don t accept what accept Americans. I just wish he will fail to fuck courageous Ukrainians and Greenland, when he tries since 1 year to rob them. When US economics is falling, with USD and petrol rate falling, only way he knows is to rob others, as he did to become rich, not paying tax. A shameful guy putting shame more than MAGA on USA. I m proud Europe resist to him, when he is not king of the world, whatever Americans can have delirium, when only 5% population, but second after criminal China for pollution. Best way to stop Putin is to take Russia money and to isolate them till starvation, even only way to get rid of him. Best way to reduce pollution is not to buy Chinese and US, when both make 50% of pollution killing our planet. Almost double pollution per American compare to Europe where we build higher quality.[/QUOTE]The only thing the EU makes better is whoors and brothels ala FKKland.
[URL]https://www.euronews.com/2025/12/25/in-2025-french-peoples-desire-to-leave-the-country-is-at-an-all-time-high[/URL]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/airbus-faces-new-quality-problem-dozens-a320-jets-sources-say-2025-12-01/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/dec/01/airbus-averts-further-travel-disruption-by-fixing-most-jets-hit-by-software-glitch[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/11/world/europe/france-is-busing-homeless-immigrants-out-of-paris-before-the-olympics.html[/URL]
You will never catch me on an Airbus piece of crap.
-
3 photos
Anybody remember restaurant closures?
The topic of restaurant closures used to be all the rage among MAGAs here and elsewhere. But this year, not so much.
Gee, I wonder why. LOL.
[B]These restaurant chains closed locations in 2025.
Dec. 30, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/30/2025-restaurant-closures-starbucks-wendys.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Restaurant chains like Starbucks, Wendys and Dennys announced that they were closing locations this year to help their businesses.
U.S. restaurant traffic fell every month this year except for July, according to Black Box Intelligence data.
..........
In years past, restaurant closures have been more concentrated across casual-dining chains, which lost customers to fast-casual competitors like Chipotle. But this year, chains across the industry announced plans to shutter at least hundreds of locations.
In such a tough environment, some restaurant companies even filed for bankruptcy protection. Hooters, Pinstripes and On the Border were some of the notable names that landed in bankruptcy court this year.[/QUOTE]No problem. In all probability, as soon as Trump's USA Agriculture business-destroying across-the-board tariffs, mass deportation of low cost, low entitlement-using "worst of the worst" busboys, kitchen workers, servers, delivery truck drivers, loading dock workers, etc works their typical disastrous Repub economic policy and stewardship economy-destroying magic more fully, Trump might be delighted to achieve a year where every month experiences a drop in restaurant traffic instead of mysteriously skipping just the one.
Oh well. We tried.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3044676]The only thing the EU makes better is whoors and brothels ala FKKland.
[URL]https://www.euronews.com/2025/12/25/in-2025-french-peoples-desire-to-leave-the-country-is-at-an-all-time-high[/URL]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/airbus-faces-new-quality-problem-dozens-a320-jets-sources-say-2025-12-01/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/dec/01/airbus-averts-further-travel-disruption-by-fixing-most-jets-hit-by-software-glitch[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/11/world/europe/france-is-busing-homeless-immigrants-out-of-paris-before-the-olympics.html[/URL]
You will never catch me on an Airbus piece of crap.[/QUOTE]I would feel more safe in Airbus than Boeing. No comparison for cars, foods, drinks, quality of life with our health protection, Americans come to France to get it.
-
Restaurant Closures in an 'A+++++' Economy?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3044768]The topic of restaurant closures used to be all the rage among MAGAs here and elsewhere. But this year, not so much.
Gee, I wonder why. LOL. [/QUOTE]It can't be, more Red Lobster [I]"All you can eat, [b]endless shrimp"[/b][/I] fiasco styled [NOPARSE]bankruptcies and closures,...can it? [i](...kkkk!)[/i] Especially in this rich, vibrant, booming and "A+++++" [/NOPARSE]economy?
So what will raging MAGA "know-it-all" economists, say is the reason this time?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3044768][B]These restaurant chains closed locations in 2025.
Dec. 30, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/30/2025-restaurant-closures-starbucks-wendys.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL] .[/QUOTE]Whoa, that's quite the list of well know and well established restaurants with closures and bankruptcies. Denny's, Hooters, Hardee's and Wendy's, just to name a few. Yes, I'm sure more than a few have stumble into Red Lobster bankruptcy territory, given the so called "A+++++" economy.
-
Electrostate v Petrostate: Nuclear, good at false promises, not so much at delivering
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3043729]7-11 years according to this article.
[URL]https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/our-activity/offshore-wind-energy/offshore-wind-park-construction[/URL][/QUOTE]Yet again, you've produced, nothing that states, nuclear is the lowest cost of energy? But it's understandable you've found nothing, since nuclear is good at false promises (like your MAGA Fuhrer), but not so much at delivering said promises.
BTW, there are two kinds of wind farms in your article, onshore and offshore. The article also says, 1-5 years for development.
[QUOTE]While the construction of an onshore wind farm can take between 4 and 8 years, taking into account all phases of the process, the construction of an offshore wind farm is estimated to take between 7 and 11 years. [b][u]Three to five years are dedicated to the development phase[/u], one to three to the pre-construction phase and two to four years to construction.[/b] [URL]https://www.iberdrola.com/about-us/our-activity/offshore-wind-energy/offshore-wind-park-construction[/URL][/QUOTE]But, it is good to see, you're doing a bit of homework for a change and looking things up. However, if you do a bit more homework, you'll see [B]what is REALITY[/B] and [B]what is FICTION![/B].
You'll find that the nuclear industry is unbelievably good at promising wonderful, low-cost and timely clean electricity but not so good at delivering it, on-time and on-budget. Whereas it's the exact opposite with solar, wind and batteries (S+W+B).
The last nuclear power plant in Texas, was the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, it started on Dec 19, 1974 and then took almost 20 years to finish building. Today, just look at Texas, who is building out more S+W+B, than anyone else in the U.S., including California. Why...because S+W+B are the lowest cost of energy and the easiest to implement!
So...if you think nuclear, is the lowest cost and takes 6-8 years to build in the U.S., then there should be lots of examples...right!
-
3 photos
Thanks again, Joe
Pathological liar and utter presidential failure Donald Trump will try to take credit for this, of course. And his MAGA suckers will believe him. But it will be all thanks to Joe Biden. Trump hasn't done shit compared to this and never will. Medicare recipients are the vast majority of the consumers for these important drugs.
[B]Medicare drug price negotiations may save some retirees more than 50% in 2026: AARP[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/30/medicare-drug-price-negotiations-savings-2026.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The first 10 prescription drugs subject to Medicare price negotiations go into effect on Jan. 1.
Medicare beneficiaries will see substantially lower costs for those treatments in 2026, according to a new AARP report.
Enrollees in Medicare Part D prescription drug plans may see their out-of-pocket costs for the negotiated drugs fall by an average of more than 50%, the research finds.
..........
Another 15 drug names are set to see price cuts under Medicare in 2027.[/QUOTE]
-
More Lies. Onshore Wind Farms 4-8 years Bud. Not 1-5.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3044863]Yet again, you've produced, nothing that states, nuclear is the lowest cost of energy? But it's understandable you've found nothing, since nuclear is good at false promises (like your MAGA Fuhrer), but not so much at delivering said promises.
BTW, there are two kinds of wind farms in your article, onshore and offshore. The article also says, 1-5 years for development.
But, it is good to see, you're doing a bit of homework for a change and looking things up. However, if you do a bit more homework, you'll see [B]what is REALITY[/B] and [B]what is FICTION![/B].[/QUOTE]Please stop with the lies. It takes 7-11 years for off shore wind farms and the link clearly states 4-8 years for onshore, if its just a few experimental wind turbines-then four years, but anything of significance which can actually power a small town takes more like 8 years. And again, on average the turbine and gearbox must be replaced every 7 years! Takes 8 years to build and needs to be replaced every seven years and takes up 300 miles of land. Why the fuck would anyone want to power their country with that when they can just build a nuclear plant, which is just a decade away from nuclear fission which will be even cheaper? I'll tell you why, its a liberal scam to make the masses pay more for their energy so they can be easier to control.
Just like this global warming bullshit. Anything that happens now is due to global warming. Hurricane- global warmings fault. Even though for thousands of years the gulf has a hurricane season. Earth in California- blame it on global warming, even California has a massive fault line. Tornado in Iowa, blame it on global warming- even though this area of the country is labeled tornado alley and has been effected by this for thousands of years. No one is paying attention to the liberal scam bullshit anymore. And thank god the masses are catching on to this shit and seeing the world and history for what it it really is.
Saw the new avatar. At least they portray the savage sadistic Native Americans for what they truly were. Some were good, some were sadistic killers who slaughtered and scalped whole villages of setters to please the sun god or some other weird shit. Thank god James Cameron is staying truer to real history.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3044855]It can't be, more Red Lobster "All you can eat, endless shrimp" fiasco styled bankruptcies and closures,...can it? Especially in this rich, vibrant, booming and "A+++++" economy?[/QUOTE]Binary boy is at it again. To recap, Tooms says restaurants are doing great in the Biden economy. Red Lobster was one of dozens of restaurants to go under in the Biden economy, and the excuse you fools came up with was "endless shrimp. " Red Lobster lost five times more money with the pandemic than endless shrimp, but whatever.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3044855]ISo what will raging MAGA "know-it-all" economists, say is the reason this time?[/QUOTE]This time? About what? Oh, you mean your asinine assetion that restaurants were doing great under Biden and terrible under Trump? That when thinking about going out to eat, people say, "Oh, Trump is in office, I better not go. "
I wonder if you even read your links because the first line was "As the restaurant industry endured another difficult year". Oh yeah, if only Biden were still in office, everything would be great. Well, I guess that is true if you run a child care center in Minnesota.
Of course, restaurants are going to be hurting when so many people are working from home and can prepare food there. And it was not a scientific journal but Walmart's own data that showed people on Monjaurno and Ozempic, which is now one in six Americans, bought much less food.
At this point, Binary Boy, I guess it is time to ask. How many government funded businesses like child day care are you running? Why else would you keep posting the same, red bad, blue good crap incessantly?
-
3 photos
We not only read the links we post, we quote from them.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3045104]Binary boy is at it again. To recap, Tooms says restaurants are doing great in the Biden economy. Red Lobster was one of dozens of restaurants to go under in the Biden economy, and the excuse you fools came up with was "endless shrimp. " Red Lobster lost five times more money with the pandemic than endless shrimp, but whatever.
This time? About what? Oh, you mean your asinine assetion that restaurants were doing great under Biden and terrible under Trump? That when thinking about going out to eat, people say, "Oh, Trump is in office, I better not go. "
[B]I wonder if you even read your links because the first line was "As the restaurant industry endured another difficult year".[/b] Oh yeah, if only Biden were still in office, everything would be great. Well, I guess that is true if you run a child care center in Minnesota.
Of course, restaurants are going to be hurting when so many people are working from home and can prepare food there. And it was not a scientific journal but Walmart's own data that showed people on Monjaurno and Ozempic, which is now one in six Americans, bought much less food.
At this point, Binary Boy, I guess it is time to ask. How many government funded businesses like child day care are you running? Why else would you keep posting the same, red bad, blue good crap incessantly?[/QUOTE]One of the quotes I included from that link states what is radically different about the restaurant closures this year under Trump's failed tariffs and trade war conditions vs when Biden was recovering us from Trump's Pandemic, producing the Envy of the World Economy, handing Trump a record high number of new private-sector jobs created at higher wages, incomes that substantially out-paced the effects of Trump's Pandemic Inflation, no Recession, not even a tiny one, and a 2. 9% entire 2024 Rate of Inflation.
A year after being handed that on a silver platter, there ought to be new locations of those restaurant chains popping up by the dozens, not closing down by the dozens, unless the fortunate recipient of those historically positive conditions on January 20,2025 was hell-bent on destroying the USA Economy, driving record numbers of businesses into bankruptcy and wiping out sizable numbers of private-sector jobs.
And to think, Trump added another $3+ Trillion to his deficits just to produce those crap results.
-
Except US Americans and criminal Netanyahou supported by USA, nobody else among 7 billions people believe nor trust the megaloman showman senile fat orange with his bullshits and ignorance about our world which have to resist to him, when he is old, can t bullshit for too long time, when already under pills. If nature could also get rid of Putin, but he seems stronger healthy, but we then would have a better world, despite criminal China killing our planet, but we can stop them easily, not buying Chinese, then they would produce and pollute less. To improve our world and for children. Funny, but not for Ukrainians, is how Putin fuck old fat since 1 year, he already finished all kamasutra positions on 2025 and will repeat each, with all with even balls in his mouth for US DT by the old. This is MAGA deeply fucked and for DT.
-
Fuck MAGA And Trump viva Maduro!
The terrorist's attacked Venezuela without any approval and kidnapped Maduro in the middle of the night like the Criminals they are.
-
3 photos
What a DickHead post--LOL
[QUOTE=EnterTheV;3045435]The terrorist's attacked Venezuela without any approval and kidnapped Maduro in the middle of the night like the Criminals they are.[/QUOTE]I live Among the millions of Venezuelan Refugees in Colombia- So Glad the ScumBag Maduro Shall Languish in Maximum Security for the Rest of His ScumBag Life-- Would Be Great if instead he could be Tortured for 2 weeks and then Decapitated.
For 25+ Yrs Venezuela has been in a Nightmare with ScumBag Chavez and Maduro Many Thousands of Venezuelans Murdered and imprisoned-- 9 Million+ Venezuelan Refugees all over Latin AMerica Living Hand to Mouth and are Exploited Everyday- God Bless President Trump / USA.
Also this is the End of the 75 Year Cuban Nightmare!
-
Viva Dirtbag Maduro (and his wife) in Florence Colorado
[QUOTE=EnterTheV;3045435]The terrorist's attacked Venezuela without any approval and kidnapped Maduro in the middle of the night like the Criminals they are.[/QUOTE]The United States of America has a new policy it supercedes the Monroe Doctrine aka Gods Law aka Our Lord and Saviors Doctrine.
Viva Venezuela sans the Dirtbag, hey Scumbag Lula I sure hope you're next.
And CDMX is shitting her panties non stop.
-
Cool!
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3045466]I live Among the millions of Venezuelan Refugees in Colombia- So Glad the ScumBag Maduro Shall Languish in Maximum Security for the Rest of His ScumBag Life-- Would Be Great if instead he could be Tortured for 2 weeks and then Decapitated.
For 25+ Yrs Venezuela has been in a Nightmare with ScumBag Chavez and Maduro Many Thousands of Venezuelans Murdered and imprisoned-- 9 Million+ Venezuelan Refugees all over Latin AMerica Living Hand to Mouth and are Exploited Everyday- God Bless President Trump / USA.
Also this is the End of the 75 Year Cuban Nightmare![/QUOTE]Let's do Putin next. Then China or North Korea? Oh wait. Trump likes those murdering pieces of shit.
Fuck trump. And stop with that stupid god bless shit. It's silly.
-
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
-
USA of robbers
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3045494]The United States of America has a new policy it supercedes the Monroe Doctrine aka Gods Law aka Our Lord and Saviors Doctrine.
Viva Venezuela sans the Dirtbag, hey Scumbag Lula I sure hope you're next.
And CDMX is shitting her panties non stop.[/QUOTE]After trying to rob Ukraine fortunately supported by Europe, when shameful MAGA would prefer to make business with criminal Putin, also trying to rob Greenland, but nobody else than US want and trust shameful orange, now Venezuelan petrol. All this in only 1 year, but failing to stop 2 wars, but supporting criminals and attacking other countries to rob them. Real shameful MAGA of robbers. Our world will live better after the shameful orange, wishing for no Vance after.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Solar and Wind, are the lowest cost of energy in 2025
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3044940]Please stop with the lies. It takes 7-11 years for off shore wind farms and the link clearly states 4-8 years for onshore, if its just a few experimental wind turbines-then four years, but anything of significance which can actually power a small town takes more like 8 years. And again, on average the turbine and gearbox must be replaced every 7 years! Takes 8 years to build and needs to be replaced every seven years and takes up 300 miles of land.[/QUOTE]Lest you forget, the origin of this debate, was about the lowest cost of energy. And yet again, you've produced, nothing that states, nuclear is the lowest cost of energy in 2025? Or will be now in 2026?
Show me when was the last nuclear plant in the USA Was built, in less than 10 years, or was the lowest cost of energy?
[I][b]Stop flapping your gums[/b][/I] and provide real-life examples of your so called claims. In case you can't read, let me remind of what I said, which is there are TWO KINDS of wind farms!
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3044940][b]Why the fuck would anyone want to power their country with that[/b] when they can just build a nuclear plant, which is just a decade away from nuclear fission which will be even cheaper? I'll tell you why, its a liberal scam to make the masses pay more for their energy so they can be easier to control. [/QUOTE]Funny you should ask, why any country would do that indeed, [I][b]since Britain has over 16 GW and 15 GW of operational offshore and onshore wind capacity, [/b][/I]respectively It is the world's leader in offshore wind, with ambitious plans to reach 50 GW by 2030 (that's less than 7 to 8 years), with [I][b]zero[/b][/I] new nuclear power plants built by then.
Stop flapping your gums (like some old granny), stop getting suckered by fossil fuel propaganda and your do your homework [I][b]and try thinking for yourself,[/b][/I] providing of course you can do a simple Google search.
-
MAGA revisionist economics?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3045104]Binary boy is at it again. To recap, Tooms says restaurants are doing great in the Biden economy. Red Lobster was one of dozens of restaurants to go under in the Biden economy, and the excuse you fools came up with was "endless shrimp. " Red Lobster lost five times more money with the pandemic than endless shrimp, but whatever.
This time? About what? Oh, you mean your asinine assetion that restaurants were doing great under Biden and terrible under Trump? That when thinking about going out to eat, people say, "Oh, Trump is in office, I better not go. "
I wonder if you even read your links because the first line was "As the restaurant industry endured another difficult year". Oh yeah, if only Biden were still in office, everything would be great. Well, I guess that is true if you run a child care center in Minnesota.[/QUOTE]]Funny, [NOPARSE]predictable and as per frickin' usual, your right-wing MAGA politics, is just like your MAGA economics...nothing but revisionist history!
Let me remind you, once again, that your dumb argument, that said Americans could no longer afford to eat at Red Lobster, under a so called "bad Biden economy", did in fact lose the debate, to the poor management style decisions, like the "All you can eat" decision from Red Lobster, that sent them into bankruptcy.
When you check the list of Restaurants provided by EihTooms, you see that several of them, have also [/NOPARSE]fallen to the bad financing and management decisions like Red Lobster, under the yoke of private equity firms, further exacerbated under a high tariff, MAGA Fuhrer regime styled economics.
-
Perhaps a Hague Tribunal?
[QUOTE=EnterTheV;3045435]The terrorist's attacked Venezuela without any approval and kidnapped Maduro in the middle of the night like the Criminals they are.[/QUOTE]Only a few more years, until a Hague Tribunal, I would imagine [I]...Yes[/I]?
Nah, want I'm I thinking. Different era, different Fuhrer!
-
Haugue Tribunal --LOL
[QUOTE=Spidy;3045633]Only a few more years, until a hI would imagine [I]...Yes[/I]?
Nah, want I'm I thinking. Different era, different Fuhrer![/QUOTE]The Hague Tribunal is only for Bullshit countries -.
-
[QUOTE=FutureDeadGuy;3045529]Let's do Putin next. Then China or North Korea? Oh wait. Trump likes those murdering pieces of shit.
Fuck trump. And stop with that stupid god bless shit. It's silly.[/QUOTE]China dream since so long about Taiwan, dangerous China killing our planet since too long. Trump wants also Nicaragua, Cuba, Greenland, Ukraine wealth, when USA economics can t compete anymore, Tesla now far behind Chinese, so, new USA business is robbering.
-
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
-
3 photos
The Great Negotiator
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3045556]After trying to rob Ukraine fortunately supported by Europe, when shameful MAGA would prefer to make business with criminal Putin, also trying to rob Greenland, but nobody else than US want and trust shameful orange, now Venezuelan petrol. All this in only 1 year, but failing to stop 2 wars, but supporting criminals and attacking other countries to rob them. Real shameful MAGA of robbers. Our world will live better after the shameful orange, wishing for no Vance after.[/QUOTE]Trump wants to convince other countries to engage in new and improved trade deals and treaties with America while demonstrating how every 4 years another Repub Numbskull like him could slither into the WH to shit on and ignore the existing deals and treaties even he negotiated and agreed to previously.
At this point Trump has started more Wars than the imaginary number of Wars he falsely claims to have settled. No surprise, since he has also increased the cost of groceries damn I'm glad he invented that word and increased the Rate of Inflation vs this same reported Q3 Rate for last year under Biden, added $3-5 Trillion to his deficits while tanking the labor market and business investments and once again driving American farmers into Recession while gifting China with their international customers now lost forever, all of which is exactly the opposite of what dumb Repub hillbilly MAGA suckers were blissfully easily conned into thinking they were voting for.
Oh well. We tried.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3045630]]Funny, predictable and as per frickin' usual, your right-wing MAGA politics, is just like your MAGA economics...nothing but revisionist history!
Let me remind you, once again, that your dumb argument, that said Americans could no longer afford to eat at Red Lobster, under a so called "bad Biden economy", did in fact lose the debate, to the poor management style decisions, like the "All you can eat" decision from Red Lobster, that sent them into bankruptcy.[/QUOTE]The only debate was in your head. The restaurant industry's own journals said their industry sucked in 2024 and Toom's article said it sucked in 2025. I didn't make an argument. I stated facts.
Then Tooms claims he thought the industry would be better under Trump and that it has not been is Trump's fault. LOL. Tooms thought things would be better under Trump would improve? That is the worst lie ever told.
Even your endless shrimp argument means egg all your over your face. Is the restaurant industry in trouble because of bad management or who is president? You cannot even give a straight answer, but you take both sides of an argument and declare victory? What else is new?
Correlating whether people go out to eat with who is president is insane. That you two bring presidential politics into everything just shows how bad your TDS truly is.
-
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3045466]I live Among the millions of Venezuelan Refugees in Colombia- So Glad the ScumBag Maduro Shall Languish in Maximum Security for the Rest of His ScumBag Life-- Would Be Great if instead he could be Tortured for 2 weeks and then Decapitated.[/QUOTE]Yeah, there are people celebrating in Venezuela and libtards protesting in the USA. Doesn't that say it all?
The funniest narrative is the USA just wants to steal Venezuela's oil. I laugh because people do not know what was going on. Chavez and Maduro have not only been stealing all the oil money. They have run the industry into the ground. So we are going to steal Venezuela's oil as compared to what? Maduro and Chavez stealing it?
FWIW though, I do not think this was even about oil. When you look at some of the swing states, if you could put a few hundred thousands Venezuelans in and pay them off to vote Democrat, you will have the entire nation in blue forever. That is what Elon Musk talked about. Last I checked there were six million Venezuelan refugees. It might be at ten million now. Most of the Venezuelan refugees illegals need to be shipped back to Venezuela and fast.
And can we stop with this fairest election crap? Look at Georgia. [URL]https://washingtonstand.com/article/315000-georgia-votes-lacked-certifying-signatures-in-2020-election-records-show[/URL]
After five years of trying, a citizen investigator has finally uncovered proof of widespread irregularities in the 2020 election results for Fulton County, Ga. , and he wants accountability. After obtaining nearly all the county's election records through an open records request, David Cross discovered that signatures were missing on no less than 134 tabulator tapes, representing some 315,000 votes.
"This is not partisan. This is statutory," Cross argued in a hearing earlier this month before the Georgia State Election Board (SEB). "When the law demands three signatures on tabulator tapes and the county fails to follow the rules, those 315,000 votes are, by definition, uncertified. "
To these challenges, Ann Brumbaugh, attorney for the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections, effectively pleaded "no contest. "
"I've not seen the tapes myself," she responded, "but we do not dispute that the tapes were not signed. It was a violation of the rule. . We don't dispute the allegation from the 2020 election. "
Just like with the Somali day care and health care scams in Minnesota, the lame stream media was once again scooped by a citizen investigator. All the lamestream media did in 2020 was repeat government talking points on Covid and how 2020 was the fairest election in American history. They did not investigate jack shit.
I am not sure if it was the plummeting ratings or polls showing a lack of trust but CBS was singing a new tune. [URL]https://*******.com/4h2weayp[/URL]
"On too many stories, the press has missed the story. Because we've taken into account the perspective of advocates and not the average American. Or we put too much weight in the analysis of academics or elites, and not enough on you. "
Well, that is great CBS, but are you going to walk the walk?
In general terms, I do not like the kind of foreign intervention Trump / the USA doing what it did in Venezuela but like you, I knew from talking to Venezuelans how fucking bad Chavez and Maduro were. One gal I was seeing showed me a video of people eating out of the garbage and said it was a daily fact of life for so many there. Of all the places in the world, Venezuela may be the exception to the rule for us not getting involved.
That does not mean it is going to be easy. Of all the things I saw, the worst was the Chavez / Maduro culture allowed for and promoted stealing. If you were in government and you were not stealing, you were a fool. I hate to say it, but the smart Venezuelans in government stuffed their pockets and got the hell out of the country. To me, that is going to be the hardest thing to change, the lawless culture.
Still, Venezuela is a country which should be as rich if not richer than Saudi Arabia given how much oil they have. If you care about the Venezuelan people at all, you should hope that Trump's plan to improve the lives of the people there succeeds. That is what matters, the plight of the Venezuelan people, but are they going to matter or is this once more going to be more of the red blue, presidential politics crap? I think we have already seen the answer.
-
Written just for you and your ilk
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3042594]Your sentiments were shared by former presidential candidate Herman Cain who is no longer with us. At the end of day was it worth it to not wear the mask?[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/diaper-report[/URL]
-
1 photos
More reasons Trump illegally started another Repub War
Aside from the more obvious reason for Trump starting another Repub War, something like the 5th or 6th War he has started so far, being to deflect attention away from the millions of his Child Trafficker closest friend ever Epstein Files discovered where he no doubt plays a starring role, this is the Real News he was hoping nobody would be talking about heading into the 2nd year of his 2nd Worst Presidency in USA History:
[B]Jack Smith says Trump acknowledged to others that he lost 2020 election.[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/us/jack-smith-says-trump-acknowledged-others-that-he-lost-2020-election-2026-01-01/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Publicly, Trump falsely claimed that he won the 2020 election. His supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, in an unsuccessful attempt to prevent the Congress from certifying the results of the election. After taking office for a second time in January 2025, Trump pardoned the rioters.[/QUOTE]Oh, on that particular issue, did you hear Trump's boast about how "regime change" might have been a failed policy for previous presidents but he has a sterling record of success for everything so don't worry about how Little Marco and Drunkie Hegseth will handle that thingy in Venezuela?
LOL.
Apparently he forgot how his disastrously failed attempt at "regime change" turned out on January 6, 2021. And that was with him already AS president and commander-in-chief of the country he led his mob of America-hating Insurrectionists into bloody battle on American soil to overturn a free and fair election, overthrow American democracy and assassinate a few duly-elected officials along the way including his own Vice President.
That was the fastest and most widely-documented failed "regime change" attempt in history. And he didn't have to send a couple loons from his Administration to another country to fail at it.
Here is one of the best short videos on the Donroe Doctrine shared with me by a friend:
[URL]https://www.facebook.com/reel/1517740762672354/?fs=e&fs=e[/URL]
-
Green Energy Scam Exposed.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3045620]Lest you forget, the origin of this debate, was about the lowest cost of energy. And yet again, you've produced, nothing that states, nuclear is the lowest cost of energy in 2025? Or will be now in 2026?
Show me when was the last nuclear plant in the USA Was built, in less than 10 years, or was the lowest cost of energy?
[I][b]Stop flapping your gums[/b][/I] and provide real-life examples of your so called claims. In case you can't read, let me remind of what I said, which is there are TWO KINDS of wind farms!
Funny you should ask, why any country would do that indeed, [I][b]since Britain has over 16 GW and 15 GW of operational offshore and onshore wind capacity, [/b][/I]respectively It is the world's leader in offshore wind, with ambitious plans to reach 50 GW by 2030 (that's less than 7 to 8 years), with [I][b]zero[/b][/I] new nuclear power plants built by then..[/QUOTE]6 months to build wind farms and the wind if free so the energy is free right? And the wind wills last 600 years and also cure cancer too LOL?
Stick to facts please. Your posts are just so misleading. Building wind farms up and down are coasts when we are 10 years away from nuclear fusion is insanely dumb and horrible for the environment. Maybe it is cheaper, still doesn't justify building it because it destroys the environment and takes up far too much space. And when the whole wind farm needs to be replaced every 7 years, my gut tells me it is not the cheapest form. Keep up the slandering scum job of green energy being at all logical. Fraud.
-
Time for Talk is Over!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3045633]Only a few more years, until a Hague Tribunal, I would imagine [I]...Yes[/I]?
Nah, want I'm I thinking. Different era, different Fuhrer![/QUOTE]Nothing makes me happier than to see criminals burn. Trump should be King of universe for getting rid of that cockroach Marduro. I love it when the time for talk ends and the cockroaches run to the shadows.
Maduro ran a nation so poorly that millions of his own people fled and the only way they could generate money was to sell cocaine and poison Americans. What an amazing for USA to show its strength and show the world there is still a time when people shut the fuck up and let the men with the biggest guns put the drug dealing criminals behind bars.
An amazing day for Venezuela as well. So happy to see them liberated, free, and on to a path of prosperity through unity and trust with the USA.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3045672]Trump wants to convince other countries to engage in new and improved trade deals and treaties with America while demonstrating how every 4 years another Repub Numbskull like him could slither into the WH to shit on and ignore the existing deals and treaties even he negotiated and agreed to previously.
At this point Trump has started more Wars than the imaginary number of Wars he falsely claims to have settled. No surprise, since he has also increased the cost of groceries damn I'm glad he invented that word and increased the Rate of Inflation vs this same reported Q3 Rate for last year under Biden, added $3-5 Trillion to his deficits while tanking the labor market and business investments and once again driving American farmers into Recession while gifting China with their international customers now lost forever, all of which is exactly the opposite of what dumb Repub hillbilly MAGA suckers were blissfully easily conned into thinking they were voting for.[/QUOTE]Old fat orange is turning too senile crazy, making not MAGA but number 1 company for robbering, for now really shameful USA. We have to stop to buy from USA, same like buying Chinese is being not responsible for our planet, when China is number 1 company to kill our planet, USA being number 2. Get rid of your crazy, not only his ears.
-
Maduro was not a democratic president, but good if Venezuela resist to crazy robber Trump, same like Canada, Mexico, Greenland and probably Cuba, Nicaragua and Colombia to come. Stop US robbers.
-
MAGA Fuhrer's policies sent more than 700 US companies into bankruptcy in 2025
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3045700]Even your endless shrimp argument means egg all your over your face. Is the restaurant industry in trouble because of bad management or who is president? You cannot even give a straight answer, but you take both sides of an argument and declare victory? What else is new? [/QUOTE][B]Bankruptcies surged this year amid inflation, tariffs,[/B] December 31st, 2025, [URL]https://finance-commerce.com/2025/12/bankruptcies-surged-this-year-amid-inflation-tariffs/r/[/URL].
If you took you head out of your Fuhrer's ass, for just one second, you's see that more than anything else, his nonsensical dumbass tariffs are bankrupting Americans, in spades. Every industry from the restaurant, manufacturing, construction, to our small businesses and farming industry. Bankruptcies have skyrocketed under your Fuhrer, to all time highs in 2025 and not seen since the Great Recession.
[B]More than 700 US companies went bankrupt in 2025 a 14% jump from last year,[/B] December 29th, 2025, [URL]https://nypost.com/2025/12/29/business/more-than-700-us-companies-went-bankrupt-in-2025-a-14-jump-from-last-year/[/URL].
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3045700]Correlating whether people go out to eat with who is president is insane.[/QUOTE]Funny, since that was essentially the very insane argument, you put forth. Suffering from senility like your MAGA Fuhrer, are we?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3045700]That you two bring presidential politics into everything just shows how bad your TDS truly is.[/QUOTE]This statement shows how very little you obviously know, about the world of politics, you live in.
-
The MAGA Fuhrer, could even 'manage' a kindergarten bake sale!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3045672]Trump wants to convince other countries to engage in new and improved trade deals and treaties with America while demonstrating how every 4 years another Repub Numbskull like him could slither into the WH to shit on and ignore the existing deals and treaties even he negotiated and agreed to previously.
At this point Trump has started more Wars than the imaginary number of Wars he falsely claims to have settled. No surprise, since he has also increased the cost of groceries damn I'm glad he invented that word and increased the Rate of Inflation vs this same reported Q3 Rate for last year under Biden, added $3-5 Trillion to his deficits while tanking the labor market and business investments and once again driving American farmers into Recession while gifting China with their international customers now lost forever, all of which is exactly the opposite of what dumb Repub hillbilly MAGA suckers were blissfully easily conned into thinking they were voting for.
Oh well. We tried.[/QUOTE]So very true [I]...and YES we did try[/I]!
But what is even more alarming, is the fact he's signaling and telling American's, Venezuelans and the world, he's going to [I]"manage Venezuelan economy/country"[/I]?
I mean, what a joke, the dude can barely "manage the American economy", as corporate and business bankruptcies are at all time highs, not seen since the Great Depression. But I guess if you consider pilfering and grifting as "managing", then he's doing a bang-up job. LOL!
Apart [NOPARSE] for the illegality of the strike on Maduro, the foreign interference, illegal coup and/or war with Venezuela, if I were the Venezuelans, I wouldn't let the MAGA Fuhrer, anywhere near their economy, let alone "manage" the funds from a kindergarten to 5th grade bake [/NOPARSE]sale.
-
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3045738]Nothing makes me happier than to see criminals burn. Trump should be King of universe for getting rid of that cockroach Marduro. I love it when the time for talk ends and the cockroaches run to the shadows.
Maduro ran a nation so poorly that millions of his own people fled and the only way they could generate money was to sell cocaine and poison Americans. What an amazing for USA to show its strength and show the world there is still a time when people shut the fuck up and let the men with the biggest guns put the drug dealing criminals behind bars.
An amazing day for Venezuela as well. So happy to see them liberated, free, and on to a path of prosperity through unity and trust with the USA.[/QUOTE]But Trump support criminal Netanyahou, and suck so deep since 1 year criminal dictator Putin. About Venezuela, his aim is to rob petrol, when he doesn't care about Venezuelans, when he doesn't care much about hundreds millions of US Americans. US Americans must really be no brained to reelect such crazy who tried to fuck Capitol and US constitution when he lost, what a guy for democracy. Very bad example for Russia about Ukraine and China about Taiwan.
-
Ok
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3045738]Nothing makes me happier than to see criminals burn. Trump should be King of universe for getting rid of that cockroach Marduro. I love it when the time for talk ends and the cockroaches run to the shadows.
Maduro ran a nation so poorly that millions of his own people fled and the only way they could generate money was to sell cocaine and poison Americans. What an amazing for USA to show its strength and show the world there is still a time when people shut the fuck up and let the men with the biggest guns put the drug dealing criminals behind bars.
An amazing day for Venezuela as well. So happy to see them liberated, free, and on to a path of prosperity through unity and trust with the USA.[/QUOTE]You like to see criminals burn? What about the pardon of known trafficker and convicted former president of Honduras Juan Orlando Hernandez? The reasoning of Trump and Co is entirely nonsensical!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3045814]So very true [I]...and YES we did try[/I]!
But what is even more alarming, is the fact he's signaling and telling American's, Venezuelans and the world, he's going to [I]"manage Venezuelan economy/country"[/I]?
I mean, what a joke, the dude can barely "manage the American economy", as corporate and business bankruptcies are at all time highs, not seen since the Great Depression. But I guess if you consider pilfering and grifting as "managing", then he's doing a bang-up job. LOL!
Apart [NOPARSE] for the illegality of the strike on Maduro, the foreign interference, illegal coup and/or war with Venezuela, if I were the Venezuelans, I wouldn't let the MAGA Fuhrer, anywhere near their economy, let alone "manage" the funds from a kindergarten to 5th grade bake [/NOPARSE]sale.[/QUOTE]Well, the Venezuelans don't have a choice over the matter any more. I am not saying Trump is the best banker of all time or anything, but I do know one thing, he can't be worse than Maduro. Maduro had to go. Love or hate Trump, the execution of the plan which occurred under his administration was flawless. Compare that to the Iraq pull out under Biden and it now looks like Biden's ineptitude can only be explained that he intentionally ran his operation so bad to just hurt the image of the US military on purpose.
Trump's list of accomplishments is growing by the week. Cuba will soon follow the will of freedom and democracy of the Cuban people and not socialist communists that support Maduro.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3045814]So very true [I]...and YES we did try[/I]!
But what is even more alarming, is the fact he's signaling and telling American's, Venezuelans and the world, he's going to [I]"manage Venezuelan economy/country"[/I]?
I mean, what a joke, the dude can barely "manage the American economy", as corporate and business bankruptcies are at all time highs, not seen since the Great Depression. But I guess if you consider pilfering and grifting as "managing", then he's doing a bang-up job. LOL!
Apart [NOPARSE] for the illegality of the strike on Maduro, the foreign interference, illegal coup and/or war with Venezuela, if I were the Venezuelans, I wouldn't let the MAGA Fuhrer, anywhere near their economy, let alone "manage" the funds from a kindergarten to 5th grade bake [/NOPARSE]sale.[/QUOTE]Not illegal -- The fake dementia Joe Presidency wanted scumbag Maduro out too-- Our president is enforcing law according to article 2 --Completely legal to arrest the cumBag Maduro.
Venezuela need and wants the USA to help-- Just ask the millions of Venezuelans celebrating in the streets-.
-
KeviKev68 is a GeoPolitical expert--LOL
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3045890]You like to see criminals burn? What about the pardon of known trafficker and convicted former president of Honduras Juan Orlando Hernandez? The reasoning of Trump and Co is entirely nonsensical![/QUOTE]Most likely he is helping Trump with intel and bringing down the cartels-- The war on drugs just started in 2025.
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3045890]You like to see criminals burn? What about the pardon of known trafficker and convicted former president of Honduras Juan Orlando Hernandez? The reasoning of Trump and Co is entirely nonsensical![/QUOTE]Trump Administration determined he was wrongfully convicted and is not a criminal. Trump is a social justice warrior for freeing a man wrongfully persecuted against. I hope world treats Trump fairly and gives him the Nobel Peace Prize for taking out cockroach Maduro.
-
2 photos
The Iraq pullout under Biden?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3045896]Well, the Venezuelans don't have a choice over the matter any more. I am not saying Trump is the best banker of all time or anything, but I do know one thing, he can't be worse than Maduro. Maduro had to go. Love or hate Trump, the execution of the plan which occurred under his administration was flawless. Compare that to the Iraq pull out under Biden and it now looks like Biden's ineptitude can only be explained that he intentionally ran his operation so bad to just hurt the image of the US military on purpose.
Trump's list of accomplishments is growing by the week. Cuba will soon follow the will of freedom and democracy of the Cuban people and not socialist communists that support Maduro.[/QUOTE]Uh. You might be referring to Biden's highly successful pullout and end of the War in Afghanistan. But none of us can be sure what you mean with such a loose grasp of even the most recent, fully-reported in Real News facts so easily available to you.
Guess what; on his worst day Joe Biden was and still is cognitively competent enough to know the difference between Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and that nobody settled a War between "Aberbijian" and Albania, as Donald Trump so proudly announced he did.
Biden's pullout from Afghanistan was the least deadly withdrawal from an occupied country by the losing side in the History of Warfare. If you can cite a less deadly one, please do so now. Making one up out of pure MAGA fantasy doesn't count.
And it was particularly successful given the horrific conditions and crippling reduction in overall troops left by Trump in his unconditional surrender to the Taliban.
Yes, the withdrawal was marred by a single suicide bomber tragically killing 13 military personnel, his having strolled through the near zero security measures granted to the Taliban by Trump in his unconditional surrender to them. A non partisan study of that bombing determined it to be "unpreventable" given the conditions handed to Biden and the USA Military by Trump.
See, your "tough on criminals" Donald Trump agreed to release 5,000 violent jihadists from the Afghanistan prisons and set them free into the country as part of his unconditional surrender to the Taliban. Among them would have been many suicide bomber candidates.
That is similar to your "tough of criminals" Donald Trump pardoning and releasing into America the 1600 convicted criminals he had led into bloody battle on American soil in their mission to overturn a free and fair election, overthrow American democracy and attack, maim, kill and assassinate a few cops and duly-elected officials along the way.
-
Robbery
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3045897]Not illegal -- The fake dementia Joe Presidency wanted scumbag Maduro out too-- Our president is enforcing law according to article 2 --Completely legal to arrest the cumBag Maduro.
Venezuela need and wants the USA to help-- Just ask the millions of Venezuelans celebrating in the streets-.[/QUOTE]Do Venezuela want Trump rob their wealth, when already not so good economics situation since a while. Ukraine don t want to be robbed by Trump and his 40 robbers. Same for Greenland. Seem new business for USA, rather than producing quality. Is it what mean MAGA?
-
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3045897]Not illegal -- The fake dementia Joe Presidency wanted scumbag Maduro out too-- Our president is enforcing law according to article 2 --Completely legal to arrest the cumBag Maduro.
Venezuela need and wants the USA to help-- Just ask the millions of Venezuelans celebrating in the streets-.[/QUOTE]No they don't Chavistas hate you gringo invaders and the rest of the world is following suite.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3045808]Bankruptcies surged this year amid inflation, tariffs[/QUOTE]You Dem cultists and your stupid tariffs are like global warming / climate change all over again. Every bad weather event was climate change. Is your party run by Americans or the Chinese? You keep bragging about how great China is. Maybe that is it. If only China could dump all their cheap shit on our shores, all would be well.
Spirit went bankrupt last year. Rite Aid has been on the verge for decades. Their bonds were selling for a quarter on the dollar 15 years ago. Hooters has competitors with better food and the reason for going, the hot women, no longer exists as the hotties are on OF now. 23 and me has had their data base breached and has handed over genetic profiles to the government. There is not one fucking thing Kamla fucking Harris would have done to save these businesses. In fact, they all earned their bankruptcies.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3045808]Funny, since that was essentially the very insane argument, you put forth. Suffering from senility like your MAGA Fuhrer, are we?[/QUOTE]The government forced restaurants to close during the pandemic and both Trump and Biden did that.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3045808]If you took you head out of your Fuhrer's ass, for just one second, you's see that more than anything else, his nonsensical dumbass tariffs are bankrupting Americans[/QUOTE]Oh please! Whatever Trump's record was, you were going to blast it, and you want proof? Your governor / VP candidate that you all thought was so great is not running for re-election. Why? Why is there no fucking comment about that? That is the guy you all thought was great. If only Trump ran the USA like Tampon Timmy ran Minnesota right?
Your VP candidate had those immigrants, the ones you Dems loved so much, stealing our country blind. Elon Musk saw that and volunteered to look into and what did you Dems do? You called him President Musk and firebombed his dealerships. How dare you tell us about how to run an economy. All you Dems do is steal from the producers and use that money to pay people to vote for you.
Do you admit to being wrong about Doge and Musk? Hmmm? Until you Dems own your actions on Musk and Doge, you should shut the hell up about the economy. You cannot steal your way to prosperity you fool.
-
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3045897]Not illegal -- The fake dementia Joe Presidency wanted scumbag Maduro out too-- Our president is enforcing law according to article 2 --Completely legal to arrest the cumBag Maduro.
Venezuela need and wants the USA to help-- Just ask the millions of Venezuelans celebrating in the streets-.[/QUOTE]It boggles the mind to see that a Dem would say Maduro, the drunk as hell Kamala, and Tampon Timmy know how to make money and Elon Musk and Donald Trump do not. Tampon Timmy and Maduro were complete grifters and Kamala got billions for her campaign and ran it so badly into the ground she had to have her debt paid off by the DNC.
All the Dems do ever do is take pot shots at Trump. They never even get into specifics. Venezuela has to get their oil back flowing again, and their infrastructure is shit. Trump has said American oil companies will be allowed to invest and others won't be. It is fair game to attack that policy. Chevron has stayed in Venezuela while Exxon got the hell out, and I do not think Exxon is anxious to get back in. Venezuela needs all the foreign investment it can get, and I do not think it is smart to exclude other nations from investing, but the difference is that I have faith Trump will change course if his policy does not work out.
When Trump brought all those ships close to Venezuela, I knew he had a different kind of plan. He was not going to follow the GW Bush, Obama, Hiliary Clinton disasters which was to kill a foreign leader and leave the nation a leaderless train wreck afterwards. So it is good Trump has a different plan, and I hope it works because we sure as hell know what does not.
-
Yeah right
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3045938]Most likely he is helping Trump with intel and bringing down the cartels-- The war on drugs just started in 2025.[/QUOTE]Lots of Trumptards drinking the kool-aid. Not before Honduras puts him in prison! LOL.
-
Yeah sure
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3045945]Trump Administration determined he was wrongfully convicted and is not a criminal. Trump is a social justice warrior for freeing a man wrongfully persecuted against. I hope world treats Trump fairly and gives him the Nobel Peace Prize for taking out cockroach Maduro.[/QUOTE]Now Trump will run Venezuela. LOL.
Let's see if Trump and wis cankles can make it up there. Don't forget that make-up to cover those bruised hands!
-
You are hilarious.
And not in a funny way. A sad way.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046010]It boggles the mind to see that a Dem would say Maduro, the drunk as hell Kamala, and Tampon Timmy [/QUOTE]I'm sure your mind being boggled isn't an unusual event. It's just a knee slapper that you have all these nicknames for the dems, but lose your shit when someone says "diaper donny" or "pete kegsbreath" etc. MAGAs really are children.
[QUOTE=="Elvis"]All the Dems do ever do is take pot shots at Trump. They never even get into specifics. [/QUOTE]No surprise to anyone, but your reading and comprehension skills suffer. Just a casual read through some of the stuff folks have posted her about trump are filled with detail. Just not detail that you can absorb and understand.
[QUOTE]When Trump brought all those ships close to Venezuela, I knew he had a different kind of plan. He was not going to follow the GW Bush, Obama, Hiliary Clinton disasters which was to kill a foreign leader and leave the nation a leaderless train wreck afterwards. So it is good Trump has a different plan, and I hope it works because we sure as hell know what does not.[/QUOTE]Trump has no plan, and you didn't know shit. They're counting on that though.
-
Robbery? You Mean Ukraine Robbing the USA with Fake president Dementia Joe
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3045992]Do Venezuela want Trump rob their wealth, when already not so good economics situation since a while. Ukraine don t want to be robbed by Trump and his 40 robbers. Same for Greenland. Seem new business for USA, rather than producing quality. Is it what mean MAGA?[/QUOTE]LOL-- Ukraine is one of the most corrupt countries on Earth-- So glad fake president dementia Joe is not giving our billions away anymore-- We need to let Russia and Ukraine settle their differences and stay the fuck out of it.
Greenland whether a USA colony or not shall be under USA control as it should be-- The USA shall once again have total Dominion over the western hemisphere-- Get used to that.
By the way Obama gave Ukraine to Russia.
-
MAGA Fuhrer dumbass tariff policies and RIP DOGE!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046009]Spirit went bankrupt last year. Rite Aid has been on the verge for decades. Their bonds were selling for a quarter on the dollar 15 years ago. Hooters has competitors with better food and the reason for going, the hot women, no longer exists as the hotties are on OF now. 23 and me has had their data base breached and has handed over genetic profiles to the government. There is not one fucking thing Kamla fucking Harris would have done to save these businesses. In fact, they all earned their bankruptcies.[/QUOTE]Dude, for all your huffing-and-puffing, it still doesn't take away from the fact that, in the first year of your MAGA Fuhrer's term, 700 US companies went bankrupt in 2025, a record 14% jump from last year and record levels, not seen since the Great Depression. That just pathetic governing and economic policies, from your lame-duck president, and we're only in year #1, into this nightmare!
[B]Bottom Line: [/B]The 700 US companies going bankrupt, [I]a 14% YOY increase...HAPPENED[/I] on your Fuhrer's watch, and largely due his dumbass tariff policies!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046009] Elon Musk saw that and volunteered to look into and what did you Dems do? You called him President Musk and firebombed his dealerships. How dare you tell us about how to run an economy. All you Dems do is steal from the producers and use that money to pay people to vote for you. ...
Do you admit to being wrong about Doge and Musk?[/QUOTE][B]We still don’t really know what Elon Musk’s Doge actually did,[/B] December, 30th, 2025, [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/dec/30/elon-musk-doge-impact-us-government[/URL].
And my fav of the two articles: [B]How Did DOGE Disrupt So Much While Saving So Little?[/B] December, 23rd, 2025, [URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/23/us/politics/doge-musk-trump-analysis.html[/URL].
A recent Senate report, also found, that DOGE's chaotic methods, such as paying employees not to work, may have created $21.7 billion in new waste. In short, DOGE serves as a case study in how a poorly defined, [B]ideologically driven bullshit[/B] approach to so called "government efficiency", just increases disruption and human cost, without achieving any such stated financial or efficiency goals.
Good riddance and [I]R.I.P. DOGE[/I]!
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: In China, it takes as little as 30 hrs per turbine
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3045737]6 months to build wind farms and the wind if free so the energy is free right? And the wind wills last 600 years and also cure cancer too LOL?[/QUOTE]Dude, don't be so freakin' naive! Anyway, it doesn't behoove you!
Today, it has never been easier, or taken very much time and / or effort, to research these things. With a quick search and you'll find, China is rapidly building out wind farms, in as little as 30 hours for individual turbines. Overall, the country is installing [I][b]the equivalent of five large nuclear power stations[/b][/I] worth of renewables every week, indicating a very fast buildout pace. [URL]https://eaxchange.engineersaustralia.org.au/studentsofengineersaustralia/discussion/china-is-installing-the-wind-and-solar-equivalent-of-five-large-nuclear-power-stations-per-week[/URL], July 18th, 2024 or [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_in_China[/URL]
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3045737]Stick to facts please. [/QUOTE]Yeah, because nothing says facts or "misleading", like doing a simple Google search, a 10 yrs old, 5th grader, could perform.
You know, ACTUAL FACTS, such as, [I]"...Britain has over 16 GW and 15 GW of operational offshore and onshore wind capacity, ...with ambitious plans to reach 50 GW by 2030"[/I][URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offshore_wind_power_in_the_United_Kingdom[/URL]
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3045737]Your posts are just so misleading. [/QUOTE]Really? Or could it be, you're just easily baffled and fooled by concepts, ideas and facts, that are represented in plain English, to establish a line of thought and reasoning, that clearly substantiates, said arguments and counterpoints, in this debate? Is that what you're call "misleading"?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3045737]Building wind farms up and down are coasts when we are 10 years away from nuclear fusion is insanely dumb and horrible for the environment. Maybe it is
cheaper, [/QUOTE]Glad to here you say it and admit to them being cheaper! But there's no maybes about it [B]...solar and wind are cheaper![/B]
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3045737]still doesn't justify building it because it destroys the environment and takes up far too much space. And when the [b]whole wind farm needs to be replaced every 7 years,[/b] my gut tells me it is not the cheapest form. Keep up the slandering scum job of green energy being at all logical. Fraud.[/QUOTE]Yes, solar and wind, have their drawbacks, but compared with dirty fossil fuels and nuclear projects, the land space / area issue, isn't really a "big deal", when applied to baron / unused land, bodies of water or agrivoltaics (lowering water consumption and enhancing crop yields).
While nuclear fusion, may or may not be 10 years away, [I][b]"How do you propose the U.S. meet and account for the rising increase in demand for electricity, in this AI/data center age?[/b][/I].
BTW, I'd love to see the [U]article, FACTS and/or data[/U] on the replacement of wind turbines, [B]every 7 years,[/B] according to your post and [I][b]"your gut"?[/b][/I]
-
Yikes!
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3046056]LOL-- Ukraine is one of the most corrupt countries on Earth..[/QUOTE]Sounds like you're a real thought leader when it comes to international affairs. So you're saying that UKR is even more corrupt that the current US administration? Wow. That sounds bad. I'm sure you're prepared with tons of examples to share with us.
[QUOTE==="Woodshed"]Greenland whether a USA colony or not shall be under USA control as it should be-- The USA shall once again have total Dominion over the western hemisphere-- Get used to that.[/QUOTE]So you're saying this is all just about the western hemisphere? Don't you think we should start with Cuba? That sure seems more relevant than Greenland. BTW. Dominion doesn't require capitalization.
[QUOTE]By the way Obama gave Ukraine to Russia.[/QUOTE]Congratulations! This is the only accurate thing I've seen you type in all your superfluous posts here in the politics section.
-
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3046056]LOL-- Ukraine is one of the most corrupt countries on Earth-- So glad fake president dementia Joe is not giving our billions away anymore-- We need to let Russia and Ukraine settle their differences and stay the fuck out of it.
Greenland whether a USA colony or not shall be under USA control as it should be-- The USA shall once again have total Dominion over the western hemisphere-- Get used to that.
By the way Obama gave Ukraine to Russia.[/QUOTE]You don't understand g how empiric system are working. They are corrupted and depend on expension to survive untill they collapse on themselve. Ukraine doesn't need USA to have a sustainable economy and is never going to be a threat for the american, but when putin empire will get the whole ukrayne they are going to look foir their necxt target and will rince and repeat untill they reach the atlantic. At this moment usa will have the chines on the pacific side and the russia on the atlantic one. We are all going to be dead long time before it happen, so on short term its better for the lving one of america to don't give a shit about it, but on the long term the future generation are going to have to deal 2 greedy empire fed by european and asian conquered ressource.
Biden was thinking the old way, the one who seen the WW2 era, trump is an oligarch who reached the higher level of power in usa and want to be like putin and xi pin.
-
I just want to watch the world burn
Oh my god. Let's get to world war 3 already, I'm so tired of this waiting. Armageddon baby!
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3046100]Oh my god. Let's get to world war 3 already, I'm so tired of this waiting. Armageddon baby![/QUOTE]And you also want to fight for your country army? I hope You do, at least, ready to die and to receive a medal.
-
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3046056]LOL-- Ukraine is one of the most corrupt countries on Earth-- So glad fake president dementia Joe is not giving our billions away anymore-- We need to let Russia and Ukraine settle their differences and stay the fuck out of it.
Greenland whether a USA colony or not shall be under USA control as it should be-- The USA shall once again have total Dominion over the western hemisphere-- Get used to that.
By the way Obama gave Ukraine to Russia.[/QUOTE]Western world don't want US robbers. Venezuela also don't want.
-
[QUOTE=FutureDeadGuy;3046047]Trump has no plan, and you didn't know shit. They're counting on that though.[/QUOTE]If you want to criticize his plan, have at it. There's no guarantee his plan is going to work. There is a very real possibility things could be worse not better with Maduro out of power. I pray that is not the case, but capturing Maduro is the easy part. Running the country is the hard part.
But if you say there is no plan, you are suffering from horrible TDS. If there is no plan, what are you griping about?
And who is they? The voices in your head? You might want to seek medical attention for that.
-
[QUOTE=EnterTheV;3046006]No they don't Chavistas hate you gringo invaders and the rest of the world is following suite.[/QUOTE]Somebody needs to tell V that Chavez is dead.
You have to wonder how many Dems would have voted for Chavez for president if he would have run as a Democrat. It is clear they adored him.
-
Maduro was Sniper of Protesters --Fact
Venezuelan immigrant speaks out following Maduro's capture; says hope has been restored.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cylfhA8pNgY[/URL]
-
C'Mon.
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3046124]Venezuelan immigrant speaks out following Maduro's capture; says hope has been restored.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cylfhA8pNgY[/URL][/QUOTE]That's one person. The rest of the regime that did the dirty work is there. However, we are not the world police. Are we going to do to China where Fentanyl is made and shipped out here? Of course not they are weakened like Venezuela.
-
Actually, Chavistas were scumbags
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046108]Somebody needs to tell V that Chavez is dead.
You have to wonder how many Dems would have voted for Chavez for president if he would have run as a Democrat. It is clear they adored him.[/QUOTE]Chavistas were the people who shared in the Trillions that Chaves Looted over the last 25 years. If Venezuela returns to a functional state these scumbags will be put in prison. I predict there will be many Lynchings like the French Revolution as Millions were murdered at the hands of these scumbags.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046074]Dude, don't be so freakin' naive! Anyway, it doesn't behoove you!
Today, it has never been easier, or taken very much time and / or effort, to research these things. With a quick search and you'll find, China is rapidly building out wind farms, in as little as 30 hours for individual turbines. Overall, the country is installing [I][b]the equivalent of five large nuclear power stations[/b][/I] worth of renewables every week, indicating a very fast buildout pace. [URL]https://eaxchange.engineersaustralia.org.au/studentsofengineersaustralia/discussion/china-is-installing-the-wind-and-solar-equivalent-of-five-large-nuclear-power-stations-per-week[/URL], July 18th, 2024 or [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_in_China[/URL].[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LklUVkMPl8g[/URL]
Time Stamp: 2:21. Video is a very non biased practical approach to how effective wind farms are. In some areas, they do kind of make sense if you are ok with giving up that much space.
The coastal shores of the United States makes absolutely no fucking sense what so ever for a wind farm location. We fish these shores, we use them for recreation, many important shipping lanes and harbors run through here. It makes so little fucking sense to build wind farms here it is frightening. Yet the last several years, NJ has to vigorously fight to keep them environment and economy destroying wind farms off our shores.
There is a very real green energy scam trying to persuade politicians to build solar and wind farms to take away power and influence from oil companies at all costs, even if it means raising energy prices and destroying the environment and local economy of where these farms will be constructed. After experiencing this first hand in NJ and witnessing the deviousness of the green energy scam, I will speak out against it as much as possible. It is a shame, because as I have said all along, in some scenarios and locations, wind and solar farms can be beneficial. They have unfortunately lost the trust of many people along the east coast because of the lack of transparency in trying to get these built off our shores.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GP6oL5vqxo[/URL]
Go research all the whale deaths off Jersey shore. It's not good for the environment.
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3046100]Oh my god. Let's get to world war 3 already, I'm so tired of this waiting. Armageddon baby![/QUOTE]Lololololol.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046072]Dude, for all your huffing-and-puffing, it still doesn't take away from the fact that, in the first year of your MAGA Fuhrer's term, 700 US companies went bankrupt in 2025, a record 14% jump from last year and record levels, not seen since the Great Depression. That just pathetic governing and economic policies, from your lame-duck president, and we're only in year #1, into this nightmare![/QUOTE]Since the great recession you mean, but I must have missed your comments about all the stealing and fraud going on in the illegal immigrant communities. Maybe they somehow got deleted.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046072]The 700 US companies going bankrupt, a 14% YOY increase...HAPPENED on your Fuhrer's watch, and largely due his dumbass tariff policies![/QUOTE]You might want to get off the beach in Brazil and stop getting outraged and see how the real world works. Let's take your first bankruptcy example that was the biggest by assets, Spirit Airlines.
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/16/jetblue-spirit-merger-block-in-win-for-bidens-justice-department.html[/URL]
The decision, handed down Tuesday, marks a victory for a Justice Department that has aggressively sought to block deals it views as anti-competitive.
"Today's ruling is a victory for tens of millions of travelers who would have faced higher fares and fewer choices had the proposed merger between JetBlue and Spirit been allowed to move forward," Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement. "The Justice Department will continue to vigorously enforce the nation's antitrust laws to protect American consumers. "
Spirit's market capitalization as of Tuesday's close was $666 million, less than a fifth of the purchase price JetBlue bid.
Yeah, well, that is great, and Spirit has filed for bankruptcy twice since this decision. Oops! So while you are babbling on about Trump causing bankruptcy, this bankruptcy is DIRECTLY due to Biden because if Biden's DOJ lets the merger go through, Spirit is bought out and there is no company to declare bankruptcy.
What you do not get about bankruptcy chapter 11 is that it is a means to shave off debt. You know the same thing you thought was so great with student loans? Cough, cough.
If Spirit files Chapter 7 bankruptcy, Jet Blue and the other airlines will buy the airplanes Spirit has and take over their routes. I mean, I loved that Spirit charged so much less than the other airlines did, and I used them but those cheap fares came at the expense of Spirit shareholders and debt holders. If management does not charge enough for their services, sorry, but that is not on Trump.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046072]We still dont really know what Elon Musks Doge actually did, December, 30th, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/dec/30/elon-musk-doge-impact-us-government
And my fav of the two articles: How Did DOGE Disrupt So Much While Saving So Little?December, 23rd, 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/23/us/politics/doge-musk-trump-analysis.htm.
A recent Senate report, also found, that DOGE's chaotic methods, such as paying employees not to work, may have created $21.7 billion in new waste. In short, DOGE serves as a case study in how a poorly defined, ideologically driven bullshit approach to so called "government efficiency", just increases disruption and human cost, without achieving any such stated financial or efficiency goals.
Good riddance and R.I.P. DOGE![/QUOTE]Boy, we live in different worlds. In my world, the media is in full fledged retreat after being shown up by a 23 year old citizen reporter using a phone. I got this USA Today editorial in my yahoo feed today, [URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/01/06/walz-dropping-out-minnesota-welfare-fraud/88031149007/[/URL]
The shocking part of this is not what is written but by whom. The yahoo feed and USA Today put out the same crap that you and Tooms do. It is always Dems good and Trump evil. It is so predictable I just ignore it, so who wrote this very critical opinion of Democrats and not what was in it was the surprise.
Then you had CBS News doing the mea culpa as well. I am shocked the Guardian and NY Times have not pulled these articles off. They have egg all over their face now for fighting DOGE.
Anyway, I must have missed why the economy that you claim is so spectacularly failing is not due in part to the untold billions in fraud and is all due to Trump. Maybe you can explain to everyone why defrauding the taxpayer and country out of billions is no big deal.
Or you can just do your usual and repeat your debunked point over and over like you always do.
-
The truth on Wind and Solar. Please Watch.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046074]Dude, don't be so freakin' naive! Anyway, it doesn't behoove you!
Today, it has never been easier, or taken very much time and / or effort, to research these things. With a quick search and you'll find, China is rapidly building out wind farms, in as little as 30 hours for individual turbines. Overall, the country is installing [I][b]the equivalent of five large nuclear power stations[/b][/I] worth of renewables every week, indicating a very fast buildout pace. [URL]https://eaxchange.engineersaustralia.org.au/studentsofengineersaustralia/discussion/china-is-installing-the-wind-and-solar-equivalent-of-five-large-nuclear-power-stations-per-week[/URL], July 18th, 2024 or [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_in_China[/URL].[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqppRC37OgI[/URL]
Here are some sobering facts:
It would 500 years for the world's currently largest battery factory "Tesla Plant" to store just one days worth of energy for just the USA. Solar and Wind do not produce energy in low winds or low light so batteries are necessary to produce constant energy.
A single 100 MW wind farm farm requires 900 tons of non renewable plastic.
By 2050, the waste in plastic from just solar panels will double all of today's plastic waste.
1 oil well produces 10 times more energy than one wind turbine, but here is the bad part. Energy storage. It costs 50 cents to store the oil energy from an oil well, but you need $200.00 in batteries to store the same amount of energy from a wind farm.
The more you look into this, the more you realize it just makes no sense.
-
Your MAGA Fuhrer's attack on Venezuela, was corrupt and illegal to the core!
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3045897]Not illegal -- The fake dementia Joe Presidency wanted scumbag Maduro out too-- Our president is enforcing law according to article 2 --Completely legal to arrest the cumBag Maduro.
Venezuela need and wants the USA to help-- Just ask the millions of Venezuelans celebrating in the streets-.[/QUOTE]The Venezuelan attack was illegal, by your MAGA Fuhrer. Isn't everything he does corrupt and illegal, anyways? LOL!
The attack on Venezuela is considered an illegal violation of the USA Constitution, [U]because it lacked congressional authorization[/U], which is required for military action. This is clearly outlined in [I][b]Article I, Section 8,[/b][/I] which only grants Congress the power to declare war, or acts of aggression on another sovereign entity.
-
The MAGA dog that caught the Venezuelan car?
[QUOTE=FutureDeadGuy;3046047]And not in a funny way. A sad way.
I'm sure your mind being boggled isn't an unusual event. It's just a knee slapper that you have all these nicknames for the dems, but lose your shit when someone says "diaper donny" or "pete kegsbreath" etc. MAGAs really are children.
No surprise to anyone, but your reading and comprehension skills suffer. Just a casual read through some of the stuff folks have posted her about trump are filled with detail. Just not detail that you can absorb and understand.
[b]Trump has no plan, and you didn't know shit.[/b] They're counting on that though.[/QUOTE]That was a very interesting observational assessment of Elvis 2008, on this take of the ILLEGAL attack on Venezuela, by his MAGA Fuhrer.
The assessment was very astute, since Elvis 2008, prior to the 2024 election was [B]emphatically[/B] crowing, jawboning and blithering on about, how his MAGA Fuhrer would [U]NEVER[/U] put America into yet another senseless war. Suckered again by his Fuhrer!
And as you've said, [NOPARSE]"Trump has no plan", why...because just like Iraq, the MAGA Fuhrer and the clueless Repubs...are just like the [/NOPARSE]proverbial [I][b]"dog that caught the car"[/b][/I].
-
2 photos
Of course, Trump had a plan. He always has a plan. And it's always the same plan.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046104]If you want to criticize his plan, have at it. There's no guarantee his plan is going to work. There is a very real possibility things could be worse not better with Maduro out of power. I pray that is not the case, but capturing Maduro is the easy part. Running the country is the hard part.
But if you say there is no plan, you are suffering from horrible TDS. If there is no plan, what are you griping about?
And who is they? The voices in your head? You might want to seek medical attention for that.[/QUOTE]Like every Repub so-called president before him over the past 100 years, Trump had a plan. And the typical Repub plan is remarkably similar to the same plan Trump has defaulted to his entire life. That's why he chose the Republican Party for his political life instead of the Democratic Party.
Since Repub so-called presidents who take office following a Democratic president over at least the past 100 years have virtually without exception been handed historically positive economic trajectories and jobs creation results, their plan was to do something big, bold, brave, dramatic, different and "entertaining" that will most certainly produce opposite results. Which means they are now duty-bound to do whatever is necessary to reverse those positive economic trajectories into negative trajectories, wipe out millions of jobs and, far, far more often than not plunge America into a Great Depression or Great Depression ASAP, something unheard of during the previous Dem's presidency.
That's much easier than coming in as a Democrat saddled with recovering and pulling America out of those Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions and Historic Repub Jobs Destruction, right? It sure is! And it a perfect Party for lazy deadbeats and con artists to take refuge.
Again, that is why Trump chose to run as a Repub and not a Dem.
Now, in addition to having decades of experience fucking up, bankrupting, wiping out other peoples' investments and producing nothing but crap results since he was born into great wealth and squandered and lost all of daddy's money as Repubs have done over the past 100 years or more with tax-payers' money, jobs and livelihoods, Trump's plan is also to do whatever it takes to deflect attention from the crap results he just produced in whatever he was up to previously by doing something bigger, bolder and dumber that will almost certainly produce even crappier results.
Hence, invade a sovereign country, kidnap its unelected dictator, declare yourself the new unelected leader of the place, therefore simply another dictator, and leave the colossal mess of crap that idiocy is bound to produce to someone else to clean up. Probably a Dem.
Lather, wash, rinse and repeat.
It's the only plan that has ever worked for him in the past and fits perfectly with what he must have observed has worked for the Repub Party for a long, long time.
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3046154]That's one person.[/QUOTE]No, it is not and if you got your head out of your ass and actually talked to Venezuelans, they all say the same thing.
Do you think she is making this up? This is the problem with you Dems. Anything Trump does and you knock it. He is trying to make the lives of 30 million people better and all you do is bash him.
And this is just really, really insensitive and offensive. You losers freak out about pronouns but a person tells you that 20% of a country's population is eating out of the garbage, and you are like, "That is just one person."
In 2007, I was in Venezuela. The people were angry, paranoid, and unhappy back then. Walking in Caracas I was scared shitless about getting mugged. When I flew to Colombia, I could not believe the difference in attitude and the happiness of the people. I never thought I would see such a change in country going from the old USSR to Finland after the Berlin Wall fell. When I was in the USSR, people would speak in whispers they were so paranoid. In both cases, I left a country filled with miserable people to a country filled with happy ones.
In Venezuela, they have no hope, no rule of law, and no positive feelings about the future. Period. So STFU about your one person crap. That comment is unbelievably stupid.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3046188]Like every Repub so-called president before him over the past 100 years, Trump had a plan. And the typical Repub plan is remarkably similar to the same plan Trump has defaulted to his entire life.[/QUOTE]That is the thing about you Mr. Binary. Hell, you cannot even say what the plan is. All you care about is whether there is a are or the behind it.
If Biden did the same thing as Trump, you would not shut up about how great Biden was, and everyone knows it. Thanks for admitting how biased and full of it you are.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046176]That was a very interesting observational assessment of Elvis 2008, on this take of the ILLEGAL attack on Venezuela, by his MAGA Fuhrer.[/QUOTE]God, you Dems are dumb. I love how you guys use terms like dictator, Fuhrer ETC in describing Trump and then say what he did was illegal. If he were a king or Fuhrer or dictator, he is the law, and you losers would never get to protest. That you losers were allowed to protest on no Kings day means there is no king!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046176]The assessment was very astute, since Elvis 2008, prior to the 2024 election was emphatically crowing, jawboning and blithering on about, how his MAGA Fuhrer would NEVERput America into yet another senseless war. Suckered again by his Fuhrer![/QUOTE]LOL. I think you have a problem with words. A war is when one country's army is shooting at another and there are casualties on both sides. In this case, the VP of Venezuela met with the generals in that country and the generals in Venezuela agreed not to resist our taking Maduro.
So we can add war to the endless list of words you Dems twist to mean what you want them to and not what they actually mean.
Did your comments about immigrants stealing billions from our economy get deleted again? I seem to keep missing your comments on why the economy is so bad because of Trump and why billions of dollars in theft does not matter. Maybe you should talk to an admin about that.
I must have also missed why you think DOGE was such a bad idea given how much stealing is going on.
And when people are caught stealing, are you Dems going to keep blaming Trump? Or keep attacking the people who find the stealing as racist? Or attack them physically? Or in Musk's case, destroy his property? Why don't you just come out and admit that if Democrats are stealing or destroying property, it is somehow good?
You and Tooms say all Democratic plans are great and all Republican plans suck. I keep waiting for you and Tooms and your vigorous defense of Tampon Timmy's brilliant economic plan, and there is nothing.
Are you bummed that Harris and Waltz did not turn the American economy into one like Minnesota?
People like you who think theft is no big deal should spend a weekend in Venezuela and really see what it is like to be scared your shit can be stolen at any second.
-
So what if wind projects don't work in NJ?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3046157][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LklUVkMPl8g[/URL]
Time Stamp: 2:21. Video is a very non biased practical approach to how effective wind farms are. In some areas, they do kind of make sense if you are ok with giving up that much space.
The coastal shores of the United States makes absolutely no fucking sense what so ever for a wind farm location. We fish these shores, we use them for recreation, many important shipping lanes and harbors run through here. It makes so little fucking sense to build wind farms here it is frightening. Yet the last several years, NJ has to vigorously fight to keep them environment and economy destroying wind farms off our shores.[/QUOTE]Tell that to Britain and China, when both countries are installing wind at a phenomenal pace. With China installing [B]the equivalent of five (5) large nuclear power stations worth of renewables every week. [/B].[/QUOTE]You and I have very different opinion and version of what a scam is and isn't. You think that any crap, your Fuhrer says is a scam, [I]is a scam...it's not![/I] Stop being brainwashed by your Fuhrer!
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3046157]It is a shame, because as I have said all along, in some scenarios and locations, wind and solar farms can be beneficial. They have unfortunately lost the trust of many people along the east coast because of the lack of transparency in trying to get these built off our shores.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GP6oL5vqxo[/URL]
Go research all the whale deaths off Jersey shore. It's not good for the environment.[/QUOTE]So what if wind projects don't work in NJ? The rest of the world will be OK? I hope you get you're so called "cheap" nuclear power, built in NJ?
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046163]Boy, we live in different worlds. In my world, the media is in full fledged retreat after being shown up by a 23 year old citizen reporter using a phone.[/QUOTE]No shit. Tell us, what's the zip code in MAGA never never land? I love the way you think anyone that doesn't want to be a cuck and suck orange man's dick has TDS. The fact is, you have Trump Cuck Syndrome. Now go wipe the nut off your chin.
-
Why don't you tell Texans it's a SCAM!
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3046164][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqppRC37OgI[/URL]
Here are some sobering facts:
It would 500 years for the world's currently largest battery factory "Tesla Plant" to store just one days worth of energy for just the USA. Solar and Wind do not produce energy in low winds or low light so batteries are necessary to produce constant energy.
A single 100 MW wind farm farm requires 900 tons of non renewable plastic.
By 2050, the waste in plastic from just solar panels will double all of today's plastic waste.
1 oil well produces 10 times more energy than one wind turbine, but here is the bad part. Energy storage. It costs 50 cents to store the oil energy from an oil well, but you need $200.00 in batteries to store the same amount of energy from a wind farm..[/QUOTE]Tell that to good ol' Texas!
Then see previous post where explain wind and solar, work just fine for the rest of the world, in spades in Britain and China, for example. And apparently, boat loads in Texas too!
[QUOTE] For the past 17 years, [b]Texas has led the U.S. in wind energy production.[/b] In 2022, Texas had 40,556 MW of installed capacity more than a quarter of all wind-sourced electricity in the U.S.7 Wind power generation surpassed the states nuclear generation for the first time in 2014 ...
Wind is the fourth-largest source of electricity generation in the country, [b]with enough power to serve the equivalent of 46 million homes.[/b] [url]https://comptroller.texas.gov/economy/economic-data/energy/2023/wind.php[/url]
We project combined wind and solar generating capacity in Texas's power market will double by 2035, fueling a growing renewable share of total generation. [url]https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=57100[/url][/QUOTE]Go ahead, tell that to the [I][b]46 million homes in the country[/b][/I] and [NOPARSE]to Texans like Elvis 2008...wind power is all just a [/NOPARSE]SCAM!
-
700 bankruptcies and fools are crowing about 1 company saved
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046163]Yeah, well, that is great, and Spirit has filed for bankruptcy twice since this decision. Oops! So while you are babbling on about Trump causing bankruptcy, this bankruptcy is DIRECTLY due to Biden because if Biden's DOJ lets the merger go through, Spirit is bought out and there is no company to declare bankruptcy.
What you do not get about bankruptcy chapter 11 is that it is a means to shave off debt. You know the same thing you thought was so great with student loans? Cough, cough.
If Spirit files Chapter 7 bankruptcy, Jet Blue and the other airlines will buy the airplanes Spirit has and take over their routes. I mean, I loved that Spirit charged so much less than the other airlines did, and I used them but those cheap fares came at the expense of Spirit shareholders and debt holders. If management does not charge enough for their services, sorry, but that is not on Trump.[/QUOTE]Hooray, for Spirit and Jet Blue, shareholders, holders of their debt and their flying customers. Now if only Jet Blue could come to the rescue of the record level 700 other companies that went into bankruptcy on your MAGA Fuhrer's watch, in 2025? Now wouldn't that be [I][b]something to actually crow about?[/b][/I].
But speaking of unwanted bankruptcies under your MAGA Fuhrer's watch and the shit-show Repub admin, 2026 should be yet another banner year for business and personal bankruptcies, as statistics indicate that 62% of personal bankruptcies are to be filed, due to Repubs not extending ACA medical care.
In 2025, there were approximately 533,949 personal bankruptcy filings, which represented a 12% increase from the previous year. This surge reflects the growing financial pressures faced by many households. [B]The Number of Bankruptcies Is Soaring in 2025, this represents a 15% increase over 2024,[/B] October, 10th 2025 [URL]https://www.capehart.com/the-number-of-bankruptcies-is-soaring-in-2025-consider-taking-steps-to-protect-your-rights-as-a-creditor/[/URL].
No doubt, I'm sure that just warms your bitter cold heart, to see your fellow hardworking Americans, suffering at the hands of your MAGA Fuhrer and shit-show Repubs, over ACA, personal and corporate bankruptcies.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046250]Tell that to good ol' Texas!
Then see previous post where explain wind and solar, work just fine for the rest of the world, in spades in Britain and China, for example. And apparently, boat loads in Texas too!
Go ahead, tell that to the [I][b]46 million homes in the country[/b][/I] and [NOPARSE]to Texans like Elvis 2008...wind power is all just a [/NOPARSE]SCAM![/QUOTE]It doesn't work just fine. When you commit that much of your energy sector to wind and power you destroy the environment and even more importantly you are paying out the ass to store the energy in batteries which rely on rare earth minerals most of which can only be sourced from adversarial nations such as China AND RUSSIA and even more importantly you have to deal with the rolling black outs when the wind dies and the skies darken.
Man, if only there was like two magic rocks and if you put them close to each they got hot and made magic energy all the time. Wouldn't that solve all this non sense about the best form of energy? Oh wait there is a magic rock that can do that! Uranium! Yayyyyy, problem solved!
But because of cry baby democrats who always want to believe in fairy tales because it makes their painful miserable lives a little less painful, we have to fight to keep the bet form of energy production.
Having 50% or 60% of your nations energy production come from unreliable sources like solar and wind is some dumb fuck shit when you can just go nuclear which doesn't destroy the environment, is cheaper, and in 10 years will not even produce any waste what so ever, even though the amount it waste it produces now is so small it is 100% insignificant to the debate.
Shut up with the green scam bull shit and use logical sources for your energy. Britain already fell to the scam because of their woke hive mind and now they deal with a very real energy and cost of lviing crisis. Their dumbasses. It didn't work. Germany deals with rolling black outs!! It doesn't work! Don't let shit near USA. Yes a few scattered wind farms here and there are fine. 3 or 4 percent of the total energy production, but to go to 50 or 60 percent is ludicrous!!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046250]Tell that to good ol' Texas!
Then see previous post where explain wind and solar, work just fine for the rest of the world, in spades in Britain and China, for example. And apparently, boat loads in Texas too!
Go ahead, tell that to the [I][b]46 million homes in the country[/b][/I] and [NOPARSE]to Texans like Elvis 2008...wind power is all just a [/NOPARSE]SCAM![/QUOTE][URL]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14220893/Germanys-wind-power-higher-bills.html[/URL]
Dumbasses! Germany and UK going broke because of Wind and Solar.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046254]Hooray, for Spirit and Jet Blue, shareholders, holders of their debt and their flying customers. Now if only Jet Blue could come to the rescue of the record level 700 other companies that went into bankruptcy on your MAGA Fuhrer's watch[/QUOTE]You do not understand what happened with Spirit nor do you want to. You have not given one example of a business going bankrupt due to Trump. Not one! And this may shock you but not all bankruptcies are bad, and I will give you an example.
Is Trump bankrupting all those child care centers and health care centers in Minnesota a bad thing? Oh snap! That you Dems cannot even deal with Minnesota says it all. Your TDS is so bad that you cannot even talk about it. Whatever economic events happen under Trump, now you fools have no way of saying Harris / Waltz would have been better.
Of all the bad stuff you babble on about with Trump, not one thing you have ever mentioned has affected me. When Tooms mentioned higher gas prices, I was like WTF are you talking about? The only thing I noticed with gas prices was how cheap they were.
But the one thing that has changed and has hurt me economically under Trump is that when I travel abroad. The dollar has plunged in value. Most other Americans do not travel as much as I do, so it does not affect them as much, but the weak dollar probably is due to tariffs. It looks like other nations are buying gold and other currencies versus buying dollars.
But that is half the story. The reason your and Tooms economic analysis is so bad is that in most cases what is bad for one party may be better for another. If you work abroad or do business aboard, a weak dollar is beneficial to you. Furthermore, if you are trying to get foreign companies to build their factories here, another Trump goal, a weak dollar is beneficial as well.
The problem is that type of investment has not come in, and it is easy to understand why. There was a guy saying he could build a robotics company that produced shoes that could compete price wise with China. If the tariff rate is 10% on Chinese shoes, it is going to be tough for him to make money, but if it is 100%, he is going to be making serious bank. Thing is early on the tariff rates with China changed by the day as Trump got in a pissing contest with Xi. When the rate is 0% one day and 125% the next and 50% the next, I am going to say, "Fuck my idea of making shoes! I am taking my money to a strip club and enjoy myself". It is fair to be critical of that.
But there was a great GDP number and the market is up at all time highs. I think that is mostly due to the AI boom which has little to with presidential politics, but any good economic news under Trump with you guys HAS to be ignored. That is part of your cult.
And that is why you Dems have no credibility. It is like you made up your minds that tariffs were going to cause inflation and then made up there was inflation. You bring up this stupid bankruptcy shit and cannot link one bankruptcy that could be blamed on Trump. None of you have mentioned the weaker dollar or the lack of non-AI business investment. What that tells me is that you suffer such bad TDS, you cannot even criticize him right.
And the real thing that pisses me off about you dumb Dems is that Trump listens. He is smart and does change course when something is not working. The days of him announcing huge tariffs on leaders he does not like have stopped.
Peter Zeihan went through this whole thing about how Trump was so stupid. He was going to use the USA military to invade Venezuela and was going to cause all these deaths due to the shitty Venezuelan roads and how many Venezuelans are armed. There was no way that Trump could take over Venezuela without American bloodshed. Oops!
Of course, Zeihan cannot admit he was wrong, and neither can any of you TDS suffering Dems.
-
3 photos
Dems never need or want that kind of plan.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046229]That is the thing about you Mr. Binary. Hell, you cannot even say what the plan is. All you care about is whether there is a are or the behind it.
If Biden did the same thing as Trump, you would not shut up about how great Biden was, and everyone knows it. Thanks for admitting how biased and full of it you are.[/QUOTE]If Biden did the same thing?
Why in the world would Biden or any other Dem suddenly decide to pull some big, stupid stunt like that in order to distract attention and focus from their usual Great Dem Economic Recovery from still another Great Repub Depression, Great Repub Recession or Historic Repub Jobs Destruction?
See, the Dem plan is to initiate, establish, enhance and embellish positive economic, jobs creation and national security trajectories and results, not to reverse them, crash the economy and wipe out millions of jobs. The latter is the Repub Party's plan. And therefore Trump's plan. Once begun, it's then just a matter of Repubs winging it into whatever direction will likely produce the crappiest results for America and the American Working Men and Women.
Sorry, but your comment makes no sense. Biden wasn't interested in finding some way to deflect attention and awareness away from his historically positive economic recovery, economic expansion and jobs creation results into some big, stupid counter-productive stunt. And neither would Trump or any other Repub IF there ever was a time when those were indeed the results Trump and other Repubs had produced. Which there hasn't been.
-
3 photos
To recap
Trump's obviously weak economy vs the Biden-Harris solid hand-off.
[B]Private payrolls rose 41,000 in December, slightly below expectations, ADP says.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/07/adp-jobs-report-december-2025.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
Here is the AI Overview for the new private-sector jobs creation in the 1st year of Trump's second disastrous term vs the last year of Biden's historically successful term as reported by ADP:
[QUOTE]ADP Research Institute data shows that [b]the private sector created approximately 780,000 jobs in 2025 (as of the end of the year) compared to about 2,200,000 jobs in 2024.[/b][/QUOTE]The CPI / Rate of Inflation through November 2025, the latest numbers we have for 2025, vs November 2024, as reported by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics?
Unchanged at 2.7%.
[URL]https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_12112024.htm[/URL]
[URL]https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/cpi.pdf[/URL]
However, it should be noted that the 2024 number was reported without Biden firing and threatening to fire any BLS and Fed officials for daring to report accurate numbers that might make him look bad and without him shutting down the government for 2 of those pertinent months in order to hide from the numbers and compromise the amount and quality of the data required to arrive at more accurate numbers.
As Trump did.
Now, while Trump and his MAGAs have been doing cartwheels over the reported 4. 3% 3rd Quarter 2025 GDP Growth number, please note Trump's firing and threatening to fire any BLS and Fed officials who dare to report accurate numbers that might make him look bad, as cited above. Something neither Biden nor any other Dem ever did:
[URL]https://www.bea.gov/news/2025/gross-domestic-product-3rd-quarter-2025-initial-estimate-and-corporate-profits[/URL]
But, oh lookie (see screenshot below); under Biden the USA economy racked up SIX Quarters of GDP Growth greater than 4.3% and all while Trump and his MAGAs were lying that it was the "worst economy ever"!
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3046312]If Biden did the same thing?
Why in the world would Biden or any other Dem suddenly decide to pull some big, stupid stunt like that in order to distract attention and focus from their usual Great Dem Economic Recovery from still another Great Repub Depression, Great Repub Recession or Historic Repub Jobs Destruction?
Sorry, but your comment makes no sense. [/QUOTE]Sen. Chuck Schumer.
THEN: "And the President brags about his Venezuela policy. Give us a break. He hasn't brought an end to the Maduro regime. The Maduro regime is more powerful today and more entrenched today than it was when the President began. " (2/5/20).
NOW: "This is reckless. And the American people are just, this morning, in fear of what's going to happen here. " (1/4/26).
Sen. Dick Durbin.
THEN: "The people of Venezuela deserve better than this. We can't allow this President's short attention span to stop us from delivering on our promise to help the Venezuelan people rebuild their country. Though President Trump may seem ready to throw in the towel, I stand committed to aiding the people of Venezuela. " (6/20/19).
NOW: "I disagree with President Trump's use of USA Military forces without Congressional approval & worry deeply about this Admin's follow through on foreign policy interventions. " (1/3/26).
Sen. Chris Van Hollen.
THEN: "The United States is now going to use its levers and influence to push for a negotiation to have a transition to the truly elected leader. Obviously, we know Maduro and his cronies do not want to go quietly into the night, but the United States needs to work with its partners and allies in the region to ratchet up the pressure." (8/2/24).
NOW: "It is an illegal act of war to replace Maduro. " (1/3/26).
Sen. Chris Murphy.
THEN: "If Trump cared about consistency, he would make the realist case for intervention in Venezuela (getting rid of Maduro is good for the United States) rather than trying to pretend his Administration all of the sudden cares about toppling anti-democratic regimes. " (1/23/19).
NOW: "The invasion of Venezuela has nothing to do with American security. Venezuela is not a security threat to the USA " (1/4/26).
Sen. Tim Kaine.
THEN: "This is a deeply concerning development for Venezuelans and for the entire region, since instability abroad impacts us here at home, too. " (9/2/24).
NOW: "President Trump's unauthorized military attack on Venezuela to arrest Maduro. Is a sickening return to a day when the United States asserted the right to dominate the internal political affairs of all nations in the Western Hemisphere. " (1/3/26).
Sen. Amy Klobuchar.
THEN: "I have of course supported bringing in the new president and delegitimizing the Maduro government. You always leave things on the table. " (5/2/19).
NOW: "I have strongly opposed sending American forces into harm's way in Venezuela without authorization from Congress. We should not put Americans at risk in this way without careful deliberation among the people's elected representatives. Wars for regime change can lead to unintended consequences. "(1/3/26).
Sen. Elizabeth Warren.
THEN: "Maduro is a dictator and a crook who has wrecked his country's economy, dismantled its democratic institutions, and profited while his people suffer. The United States should lead the international community in addressing Venezuela's humanitarian crisis and supporting regional efforts to negotiate a political transition. " (7/30/2019).
NOW: "What does it mean that the USA Will 'run' Venezuela, and what will Trump do next around the world? The American people voted for lower costs, not for Trump's dangerous military adventurism overseas that won't make the American people safer. " (1/3/26).
Rep. Jamie Raskin.
THEN: "The democratic world must stand up for the rule of law in Venezuela and oppose Maduro's assault on the electoral process and free speech. The right-wing attack on democratic institutions anywhere is a threat to freedom everywhere. " (8/2/24).
NOW: "Trump is not only violating our Constitution, but he is shredding the rules-based international order created after World War II, whose essential building block is the political sovereignty and territorial integrity of each nation. " (1/4/26).
Rep. Darren Soto.
THEN: "Honored to speak with at cdvorlando yesterday about Venezuelan TPS, raising the reward for Maduro's capture to $100 M, and bringing democracy back to Venezuela. " (10/6/24).
NOW: "Trump's trading one dictator for another just to get oil? This will do NOTHING to help my constituents' family members who just lost their TPS and still can't return home. " (1/5/26).
Well, at least you are consistent Tooms, consistently full of it but consistent. When you talk about that great economy, are you talking about Minnesota? Or Somalia?
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046250]Tell that to good ol' Texas!
Then see previous post where explain wind and solar, work just fine for the rest of the world, in spades in Britain and China, for example. And apparently, boat loads in Texas too!
Go ahead, tell that to the 46 million homes in the country and to Texans like Elvis 2008...wind power is all just a SCAM![/QUOTE]You are picking the one state in the country that produces the most oil and gas to say how great green energy is? LOL.
If you knew squat, you would know that the productive wind power is mostly in West Texas which is scarcely populated with few trees where the land is cheap. That supports Ram's point.
I still don't get you with your stupid green energy always good crap. Do you understand that putting up wind mills in West Texas makes sense because the wind is always blowing and the land is cheap, and it does not make sense in places like East Texas where the land is more expensive and the wind does not consistently blow?
Texas has a rational energy policy. When green energy makes economic sense, we use it. When it does not, we don't. You dumb Dems want to force everyone to use green energy all the time which is crazy.
If you drive around the city, especially one with warm weather, having an all electric car makes sense, but you would be fucking crazy to want to use an all electric car to drive around the country. You would have to spend half your trip charging the damned car.
Biden wanted to put rapid charging stations across the whole country, and the plan was a complete disaster. I thought the solution of swapping out depleted batteries for precharged ones made sense as that only takes a few minutes versus hours, so Biden's dumb plan was outdated even before it began.
Thing is if there is money to be made in charging up cars or swapping batteries then private industry will produce the products. Why you need government using tax payer dollars to force this crap down taxpayer's throats, because green energy good, is beyond me.
-
Watch your language
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046228]No, it is not and if you got your head out of your ass and actually talked to Venezuelans, they all say the same thing.
Do you think she is making this up? This is the problem with you Dems. Anything Trump does and you knock it. He is trying to make the lives of 30 million people better and all you do is bash him.
And this is just really, really insensitive and offensive. You losers freak out about pronouns but a person tells you that 20% of a country's population is eating out of the garbage, and you are like, "That is just one person."
In 2007, I was in Venezuela. The people were angry, paranoid, and unhappy back then. Walking in Caracas I was scared shitless about getting mugged. When I flew to Colombia, I could not believe the difference in attitude and the happiness of the people. I never thought I would see such a change in country going from the old USSR to Finland after the Berlin Wall fell..[/QUOTE]It's the same regime you dummy. The disaster of Venezuela isn't going away because Maduro is no longer there. What we have now is different dog same fleas. The infrastructure of Venezuela will years to fix and your Trump will be out of office and fertilizer when that happens.
This nonsense about "running" Venezuela could not fool anyone except Trumptards like yourself.
-
Watch your language
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046228]No, it is not and if you got your head out of your ass and actually talked to Venezuelans, they all say the same thing.
Do you think she is making this up? This is the problem with you Dems. Anything Trump does and you knock it. He is trying to make the lives of 30 million people better and all you do is bash him.
And this is just really, really insensitive and offensive. You losers freak out about pronouns but a person tells you that 20% of a country's population is eating out of the garbage, and you are like, "That is just one person."
In 2007, I was in Venezuela. The people were angry, paranoid, and unhappy back then. Walking in Caracas I was scared shitless about getting mugged. When I flew to Colombia, I could not believe the difference in attitude and the happiness of the people. I never thought I would see such a change in country going from the old USSR to Finland after the Berlin Wall fell. When I was in the USSR, people would speak in whispers they were so paranoid. In both cases, I left a country filled with miserable people to a country filled with happy ones.
In Venezuela, they have no hope, no rule of law, and no positive feelings about the future. Period. So STFU about your one person crap. That comment is unbelievably stupid.[/QUOTE]It's the same regime you dummy. The disaster of Venezuela isn't going away because Maduro is no longer there. What we have now is different dog same fleas. The infrastructure of Venezuela will years to fix and your Trump will be out of office and fertilizer when that happens.
This nonsense about "running" Venezuela could not fool anyone except Trumptards like yourself.
-
3 photos
What does this consistent blather of yours have to do with anything?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046404]Sen. Chuck Schumer.
THEN: "And the President brags about his Venezuela policy. Give us a break. He hasn't brought an end to the Maduro regime. The Maduro regime is more powerful today and more entrenched today than it was when the President began. " (2/5/20).
NOW: "This is reckless. And the American people are just, this morning, in fear of what's going to happen here. " (1/4/26).
Sen. Dick Durbin.
THEN: "The people of Venezuela deserve better than this. We can't allow this President's short attention span to stop us from delivering on our promise to help the Venezuelan people rebuild their country. Though President Trump may seem ready to throw in the towel, I stand committed to aiding the people of Venezuela. " (6/20/19).
NOW: "I disagree with President Trump's use of USA Military forces without Congressional approval & worry deeply about this Admin's follow through on foreign policy interventions. " (1/3/26).
Sen. Chris Van Hollen.
THEN: "The United States is now going to use its levers and influence to push for a negotiation to have a transition to the truly elected leader. Obviously, we know Maduro and his cronies do not want to go quietly into the night, but the United States needs to work with its partners and allies in the region to ratchet up the pressure." (8/2/24).
NOW: "It is an illegal act of war to replace Maduro. " (1/3/26).
Sen. Chris Murphy.
THEN: "If Trump cared about consistency, he would make the realist case for intervention in Venezuela (getting rid of Maduro is good for the United States) rather than trying to pretend his Administration all of the sudden cares about toppling anti-democratic regimes. " (1/23/19).
NOW: "The invasion of Venezuela has nothing to do with American security. Venezuela is not a security threat to the USA " (1/4/26).
Sen. Tim Kaine.
THEN: "This is a deeply concerning development for Venezuelans and for the entire region, since instability abroad impacts us here at home, too. " (9/2/24).
NOW: "President Trump's unauthorized military attack on Venezuela to arrest Maduro. Is a sickening return to a day when the United States asserted the right to dominate the internal political affairs of all nations in the Western Hemisphere. " (1/3/26).
Sen. Amy Klobuchar.
THEN: "I have of course supported bringing in the new president and delegitimizing the Maduro government. You always leave things on the table. " (5/2/19).
NOW: "I have strongly opposed sending American forces into harm's way in Venezuela without authorization from Congress. We should not put Americans at risk in this way without careful deliberation among the people's elected representatives. Wars for regime change can lead to unintended consequences. "(1/3/26).
Sen. Elizabeth Warren.
THEN: "Maduro is a dictator and a crook who has wrecked his country's economy, dismantled its democratic institutions, and profited while his people suffer. The United States should lead the international community in addressing Venezuela's humanitarian crisis and supporting regional efforts to negotiate a political transition. " (7/30/2019).
NOW: "What does it mean that the USA Will 'run' Venezuela, and what will Trump do next around the world? The American people voted for lower costs, not for Trump's dangerous military adventurism overseas that won't make the American people safer. " (1/3/26).
Rep. Jamie Raskin.
THEN: "The democratic world must stand up for the rule of law in Venezuela and oppose Maduro's assault on the electoral process and free speech. The right-wing attack on democratic institutions anywhere is a threat to freedom everywhere. " (8/2/24).
NOW: "Trump is not only violating our Constitution, but he is shredding the rules-based international order created after World War II, whose essential building block is the political sovereignty and territorial integrity of each nation. " (1/4/26).
Rep. Darren Soto.
THEN: "Honored to speak with at cdvorlando yesterday about Venezuelan TPS, raising the reward for Maduro's capture to $100 M, and bringing democracy back to Venezuela. " (10/6/24).
NOW: "Trump's trading one dictator for another just to get oil? This will do NOTHING to help my constituents' family members who just lost their TPS and still can't return home. " (1/5/26).
Well, at least you are consistent Tooms, consistently full of it but consistent. When you talk about that great economy, are you talking about Minnesota? Or Somalia?[/QUOTE]You respond to my posting fully-substantiated data showing the economy that Trump and his MAGAs claim is "the greatest economy ever after the worst economy ever under Biden" producing typically crap Repub results vs Biden's typical far, far superior Dem results as the reason Trump pulled his latest big, stupid distraction stunt by posting Dems denouncing the Maduro regime that Trump's big, stupid distraction stunt has done nothing to remove or replace as proof of what now?
-
Lol!
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3046154]That's one person. The rest of the regime that did the dirty work is there. However, we are not the world police. Are we going to do to China where Fentanyl is made and shipped out here? Of course not they are weakened like Venezuela.[/QUOTE]That's one of the 95%+ of the 30 Million+ Venezuelan population that are overjoyed at the USA Liberating Venezuela.
You Must live under a rock without WIFI-- You ever been to any latin countries? I live in Bogotá for 15+Years. I Live among the Millions of Great Venezuelan Refugees who Are So Happy Now after the End of the 26+ Years Venezuela Nightmare. I actually paid for a little girl named Rosmari to have heart surgery. For 5+ yrs-I have been helping her and her family who are destitute. I do have a GoFundMe if anyone wants to personally help a bunch of great kids--PM Me-- (Thank You Elvis by the way).
And I have lived in Ecuador, Mexico and visited all over Latin America since 1990. Hablas Espanol?
Yes-- We are not the world's police but we must have dominion over the entire western hemisphere for the good of the world. Hence taking down Maduro which never would have happened without our greatest American President Donald J. Trump.
The rest of the ScumBags Chavistas in Venezuela you say are controlling Venezuela-- Actually no and Shall not last long-- We are controlling the oil now and that is one of the keys. The CIA is on the ground pushing buttons -- Venezuela Shall Be Great Again! It's Different This Time!
China shall calm the fuck down with their Garbage chemicals-- They already are since the beginning of the real war on drugs has begun in 2025-.
The Venezuela Liberation by the USA is the the greatest Geopolitical event since the liberation of the Nazi concentration camps--Prove Me Wrong!
The Cuba Nightmare Shall and Must End Soon.
-
Wrong Again
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046167]The Venezuelan attack was illegal, by your MAGA Fuhrer. Isn't everything he does corrupt and illegal, anyways? LOL!
The attack on Venezuela is considered an illegal violation of the USA Constitution, [U]because it lacked congressional authorization[/U], which is required for military action. This is clearly outlined in [I][b]Article I, Section 8,[/b][/I] which only grants Congress the power to declare war, or acts of aggression on another sovereign entity.[/QUOTE]The Military action was Law Enforcement Action like Panama with Noriega-.
So funny how so many TDS DumbAsses hate our greatest American President Donald J. Trump-- Unpresidented vitriol.
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3046447]It's the same regime you dummy. The disaster of Venezuela isn't going away because Maduro is no longer there. What we have now is different dog same fleas. The infrastructure of Venezuela will years to fix and your Trump will be out of office and fertilizer when that happens.
This nonsense about "running" Venezuela could not fool anyone except Trumptards like yourself.[/QUOTE]Strongly disagree. Maduro is an evil tyrant who raped the people of Venezuela. He's a real life dictator, not a pretend dictator like dems want to believe Trump is. Cuba and Venezuela were absolute shit shows of human atrocity and scoop him up in the middle of the night sends a message that the days doing what ever you want with out being held accountable are over. Even if it does nothing to change Venezeula it is the right thing to do in the name of freedom and Democracy. It is also sends the message, don't fuck with USA or our special ops will end you in your sleep. Countries will think twice before trying to tak advantage of the USA like they have been doing for years now since Obama had USA bend over for the world, especially China.
-
Before, USA used to shoot Black, but now even Caucasian type mother of 3 children. When I say since long time he is senile, but old orange and his robbers become really dangerous.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Electricity Grid Infrastructure is Key!
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3046307][URL]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14220893/Germanys-wind-power-higher-bills.html[/URL]
Dumbasses! Germany and UK going broke because of Wind and Solar.[/QUOTE][B]If you've actually read the article,[/B] you'll see that the author of the article, clearly points to constraints of the German (or Britain and the rest of Europe for that matter, their) electrical grid infrastructure capacity, as the major bottleneck, for consumers not benefiting from the additional renewable sources, that lead to "soaring energy bills".
But like any good right-wing publication, they'll naturally frame the problem, as renewables, being the cause.
Nevertheless. What the article also grossly disregards or woefully and neglectfully fails to mention, is that the major impact and cause of "soaring energy bills" in Germany, is also due to the following three (3) critical things:
[LIST] the impact and loss of cheap Russian pipeline gas (from Ukraine vs Russian war) and;[/LIST][LIST] their stupid decision to shut down their perfectly good working nuclear power plants (post Fukushima) and;[/LIST][LIST] they poorly rushed into and poorly negotiated, senseless long-term LNG/GAS contracts with the U.S.[/LIST]
[B]Geopolitics and Europes Natural Gas Supply: Aspects and Consequences from a Gas and Electricity Markets Perspective[/B], July 2025, [URL]https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2025/number/6/article/geopolitics-and-europe-s-natural-gas-supply.html[/URL].
[B]Bottom line:[/B] Most countries, that are seeing a surge in growth of electricity usage, are experiencing higher electricity bills, due to the upgrading of electricity grids and addition of more input energy sources. All three (3) points above and the cost of upgrading the grid infrastructure are primary reasons for the "soaring energy bills" in Germany.
BTW, I'm still curious, what type of energy generation, does NJ want, supplement their grid? And when do they want it?
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3046447]It's the same regime you dummy.[/QUOTE]Hey, watch your language! LOL. That is what I mean with how full of it you Dems are. Thirty million people suffering? That is just one person's point of view. The worse of the use ass? Hey, that is serious. Somebody needs to do something about that.
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3046447]The infrastructure of Venezuela will years to fix and your Trump will be out of office and fertilizer when that happens.The infrastructure of Venezuela will years to fix and your Trump will be out of office and fertilizer when that happens.This nonsense about "running" Venezuela could not fool anyone except Trumptards like yourself.[/QUOTE]I love the shining examples of Democratic etiquette and the use of Trumptard and dummy as examples of being a Democratic PC. So to paraphrase these two sentences. Venezuela is going to have its infrastructure fixed but I am stupid for thinking that is a good thing because Trump will be out of office and will not get credit for it.
And you think that is what I care about? Not the suffering of 30 millions people, but Trump getting credit for bringing Venezuela out of poverty?
Well, I do not think like that. Hell, if a Democrat had a plan to help Venezuela that I thought was a good idea, I would be all for it. I do not think like that, but obviously you do, and all I can say about you is turn off the MSNBC and CNN and actually start talking to people and not just people who agree with you. You need to get a fucking life.
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3046548]Before, USA used to shoot Black, but now even Caucasian type mother of 3 children. When I say since long time he is senile, but old orange and his robbers become really dangerous.[/QUOTE]3 children now without mother. Great MAGA crazy murderers. Wake up Americans versus schizophrene facists. I m happy Tesla is falling, even I don t want BYD killing our planet.
-
3 photos
Uh. Your greatest American president? Lolol
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3046501]The Military action was Law Enforcement Action like Panama with Noriega-.
So funny how so many TDS DumbAsses hate our greatest American President Donald J. Trump-- Unpresidented vitriol.[/QUOTE]Panama under Noriega had declared war against the USA. The USA already had a significant military presence in Panama and Noriega's regime had attacked and killed USA military personnel.
It was nothing like Trump's big, stupid stunt of distraction from his crap policy and management results in America this time around with Venezuela.
The dude layed the groundwork for, ushered in and exacerbated the Covid-19/ Trump's Pandemic, mass murdering millions of people around the world including at least a million Americans, wiped out millions of jobs, collapsed global supply-chains, triggered the skyrocketing global inflation, business and school closures that followed.
As a further consequence of the historically worst economic and national security decisions of all time, he then left office with fewer jobs in the USA economy than the day he took office, something no president has accomplished since Repub Herbert Hoover. And that was after his one and only economic "stimulus" legislation of his 1st term added Trillions to his deficits while creating fewer jobs with it than without it and his failed tariff and trade war with China driving the USA Agriculture and Manufacturing Industries into Recession so deep he had to issue emergency welfare checks just to keep them afloat.
He now appears to be trying to surpass his 1st term Worst President in USA History results by doubling and tripling down on the same disastrous economic and national security decisions he made the first time around all over again this second time around.
Except sooner and faster.
Year one of his 2nd term, Trump's disastrous policies and stewardship have already managed to produce only 25-30% of the private-sector jobs that Biden's policies and stewardship produced the year before, while still adding Trillions MORE to his deficits! And without one brick of Trump "Infrastructure Week" from all 5 of his years as president being laid to improve life for anyone anywhere!
And so much more crap results.
LOL. Yet you MAGAs are still hanging on to that TDS excuse for why well-informed, thinking, patriotic Americans would object to that America-hating, Insurrectionists, warmongering, horrific results-producing orange loon. Lolol. Amazing.
-
Our Lord and Saviors style aka The Mafia
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3046548]Before, USA used to shoot Black, but now even Caucasian type mother of 3 children. When I say since long time he is senile, but old orange and his robbers become really dangerous.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/09/magazine/trump-venezuela-foreign-policy-realism-greenland.html[/URL]
-
3 photos
Trump rigged the stock market with his crap economic results reports. LOL
Trump is out there tipping off his stock market investor class Americans about his crap economic numbers that must be much, much worse even than reported since he has fired and threatened to fire BLS and Fed officials for reporting accurate numbers that make him look bad. He tries to rig everything. Everything. Even his crap economic results.
So imagine how bad these full year Trump jobs creation numbers for 2025 vs Biden's 2024 numbers are for real. Lolol.
Trump's Trillions added to his deficits and jacking up the price of groceries god I'm glad he invented that word has still somehow miraculously produced something like 25-30% of the jobs, especially private-sector jobs, in 2025 than Biden's policies created in 2024.
Oh well. We tried.
Behold what that deadbeat scamming failure did with his latest crap economic numbers:
[B]Trump revealed some of Friday's jobs data early in post the prior day[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/09/trump-revealed-jobs-data-early.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]President Donald Trump in a social media post Thursday evening indirectly revealed data from Fridays market-moving nonfarm payrolls count, an apparent violation of long-standing federal policy.
Office of Management and Budget policy prohibits executive branch officials from commenting on such releases early and in fact forbids public statements until 30 minutes after the release.
..........
In a Truth Social post around 9 p.m. ET, the president indicated that private sector payrolls had expanded by 654,000 for the full year of 2025, a total that would have included Fridays jobs count for December.
.............
While Trumps post would not allow traders to calculate the exact payrolls figure because of lack of data on revisions, they could have gleaned a rough estimation of the figure and possibly ruled out a December job-loss scenario that would have spooked markets.
Trump once telegraphed somewhat a positive jobs figure in his first term, drawing criticism.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3046548]Before, USA used to shoot Black, but now even Caucasian type mother of 3 children. When I say since long time he is senile, but old orange and his robbers become really dangerous.[/QUOTE]Yes and sadly it is not going to stop even if the orange is gone. Its a systemic changed who began after the 9/11. The fear post 9/11 pushed the american toward a blind desire and acceptation of total security and when you want to total security you have the pay the price and the price is your liberty. USA is more and more authocratic since the 2 towerd collapsed and trump is only an symptom of the american March toward an autocratic system. Trump family and his olligarch friends are only harvesting the fruits of it. In the best case scenario it will take decade to come back to somthing more balanced and in the worst it can take century. Now trumpe and pals are working to secure enough poeple in american soil that they are ok as long as they are on the same side. Evey onme else are in danger now but not if your are on trump side. Like putin and xi pin and all other autocratic system had made before them. Mid terms of November are going to be a crucial moment to define if usa of tomorow is ggoing to be a dictature or an olligarchy.
-
Give me a break!
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3046514]Strongly disagree. Maduro is an evil tyrant who raped the people of Venezuela. He's a real life dictator, not a pretend dictator like dems want to believe Trump is. Cuba and Venezuela were absolute shit shows of human atrocity and scoop him up in the middle of the night sends a message that the days doing what ever you want with out being held accountable are over. Even if it does nothing to change Venezeula it is the right thing to do in the name of freedom and Democracy. It is also sends the message, don't fuck with USA or our special ops will end you in your sleep. Countries will think twice before trying to tak advantage of the USA like they have been doing for years now since Obama had USA bend over for the world, especially China.[/QUOTE]You have a lot a nerve complaining about Maduro when Trump has been sucking up to Putin and Kim Jong Un. Why in gods name would any "serious" leader go to North Korea. They don't bother to have elections there and people starve to death.
Oh sure, Putin is the leader of the "democracy" that is Russia. Another life-long dictator who holds fake elections and murders the opposition I. E Navalny.
China, Russia and North Korea fuck with the USA while Trump is in office. I don't like this tough guy talk Trump and crew including the 129 pound soaking wet Steven Miller.
Freedom and democracy you say from the group that tried to overthrow an election. What happened to not getting America into bogged down wars. Someone needs to wake Trump up we know sleeps occasionally while cameras are rolling. LOL.
-
[QUOTE=BennieBen;3046630]Yes and sadly it is not going to stop even if the orange is gone. Its a systemic changed who began after the 9/11. The fear post 9/11 pushed the american toward a blind desire and acceptation of total security and when you want to total security you have the pay the price and the price is your liberty. USA is more and more authocratic since the 2 towerd collapsed and trump is only an symptom of the american March toward an autocratic system. Trump family and his olligarch friends are only harvesting the fruits of it. In the best case scenario it will take decade to come back to somthing more balanced and in the worst it can take century. Now trumpe and pals are working to secure enough poeple in american soil that they are ok as long as they are on the same side. Evey onme else are in danger now but not if your are on trump side. Like putin and xi pin and all other autocratic system had made before them. Mid terms of November are going to be a crucial moment to define if usa of tomorow is ggoing to be a dictature or an olligarchy.[/QUOTE]Nah that's just pipe dreams. This murder was definitely not necessary, and personally I think the guy is clearly wrong and ICE should admit it was over the top use of force. But the reality is this. What the fuck did you think was going to fucking happen if you open up the fucking border and let 30 million illegal immigrants into the country? You do that, and your losing the next election no matter what. Your basically saying, ok well lose the next election with the open border, but 12 years from now, we lock up elections for good with the illegal immigrant vote. They marry or work their way into citizenship some how. But obviously after they lose the election, it is going to be chaos for awhile, which it is right now with ICE trying to remove illegals and preserve America for the people who came here legally.
This is just one incident in a nation of possibly 360 million people when you count illegals. At some point, some one is going to be shot by a cop in a nation of that size. Especially with th ICE removals taking place. Statistically, there is no inherent problem.
Now add in this lady is the dumbest mother fucker in the country, maybe you could argue she deserved to die for trying to run her car into an ICE officer and drive away. I just don't get how anyone could be so fucking stupid to try that when they have nothing to even hide and where did she plan on driving to, like the cops were going to just let her go. She tried to run into the wrong guy who just didn't give a fuck anymore. A guy who decided the time for talk was over and the time to defend with deadly use of force has arrived. When you run a car into a cop, they legally have the right to use deadly force. This lady is a fucking idiot. And we also know now why this dude really doesn't give a fuck. Some one had already tried to kill him and run him over and he was done playing games. Hopefully people realize, there are a lot of cops out there that have been on the beat for a minute and really don't fucking care about anything anymore and if you threaten their life, they won't hesitate for a second to take yours away from you.
What really needs to happen is immigrants should take this offer of a few thousand to leave the country and people should start obeying the law and not try to run their cars into police officers.
-
Still waiting
I'm still waiting on World War 3. I want to watch the world burn, why is that too much to ask? Come on already!
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3046640]I'm still waiting on World War 3. I want to watch the world burn, why is that too much to ask? Come on already![/QUOTE]Could not agree more. We're a nasty species.
-
It might require a decade or two or more of total Dem control.
[QUOTE=BennieBen;3046630]Yes and sadly it is not going to stop even if the orange is gone. Its a systemic changed who began after the 9/11. The fear post 9/11 pushed the american toward a blind desire and acceptation of total security and when you want to total security you have the pay the price and the price is your liberty. USA is more and more authocratic since the 2 towerd collapsed and trump is only an symptom of the american March toward an autocratic system. Trump family and his olligarch friends are only harvesting the fruits of it. In the best case scenario it will take decade to come back to somthing more balanced and in the worst it can take century. Now trumpe and pals are working to secure enough poeple in american soil that they are ok as long as they are on the same side. Evey onme else are in danger now but not if your are on trump side. Like putin and xi pin and all other autocratic system had made before them. Mid terms of November are going to be a crucial moment to define if usa of tomorow is ggoing to be a dictature or an olligarchy.[/QUOTE]I can't imagine any serious nation engaging in a meaningful trade deal, peace and security treaty or business relationship with the USA going forward now that they know every 2-4 years 49% of the American electorate is blitheringly stupid and self-destructive enough to put loony Repub MAGAs in control of one or both Houses of Congress or at the helm in the White House.
At which point they will shit on whatever agreements even they themselves had made just 2-3 years earlier and throw America and the rest of our customers or suppliers into economic paralysis along with being threatened with War, Invasion, Occupation, Nuclear Annihilation, especially our historical allies.
And all while a minimum of 5 loony Repub MAGAs in the Supreme Court is all it takes to rule in favor of whatever one-time-ever loony, criminal, America-hating stunt their fellow loony Repub MAGAs in the WH or Congress wants to pull.
Even a decade of complete Dem control of everything won't be enough to put America back on track to sanity. The next election 2 years after that might bring more Repub MAGA looniness, warfare, economic disaster, global Pandemic, whatever than we ever had before. And now every other nation knows it.
It might require the loony Repub MAGA Party to dissolve and go the way if the Whig Party. And even then at least 10-20 years must pass to see where the loony Repub MAGA Party refugees landed before anyone can conduct serious business with America again. Probably more like 30-40 years after that.
-
2 photos
This can't be happening, of course. Trump / MAGA cannot conceive of it happening.
How can a huge, globally-successful entity like Amazon possibly consider setting up their first ever big deal brick and mortar enterprise smack in the middle of a "Dem-controlled hellhole of rampant crime, welfare queens, trash and blight"?
I mean, wouldn't Amazon have done its due diligence on where American Working Men and Women have good jobs, good paying jobs, live, earn and invest responsibly, show pride of ownership in the American Dream, achieve and succeed enough to warrant the huge investment?
Surely they would be looking at setting up such a first time big commitment and endeavor in Hootervile Utah, Pixly Kansas or some other serene Repub MAGA-controlled tumbleweed, rattlesnake and outhouse settlement.
No?
[B]Amazon plans first big-box retail store in Chicago suburb.
Jan. 9, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/09/amazon-plans-first-big-box-retail-store-in-chicago-suburb.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Amazon has proposed building a big-box retail store in a Chicago suburb that would be larger than a Walmart Supercenter.
It marks Amazons latest physical retail experiment, after it launched bookstores, a chain of fashion stores, convenience marts and supermarkets, scrapping some concepts along the way.
The 229,000-square-foot store is expected to offer a mix of groceries, general merchandise and household essentials.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Goatscrot;3046655]Could not agree more. We're a nasty species.[/QUOTE]So, I guess both of you will be first to run at next war, to give your life for your country to get a medal, same like courageous Ukrainians.
-
Expert explains, why the illegal attacks against Venezuela were unlawful
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3046501]The Military action was Law Enforcement Action like Panama with Noriega-.
So funny how so many TDS DumbAsses hate our greatest American President Donald J. Trump-- Unpresidented vitriol.[/QUOTE]The [NOPARSE]U.S. military 1989 invasion of Panama and Venezuela, with the illegal abductions of Noriega and Maduro, while both are characterized and framed as a law-enforcement operations, both operations did unlawfully violated U.S. and International Laws, as both lacked the credible basis for legal military action, in a either [/NOPARSE]courts of law.
[B]Were the US actions in Venezuela legal under international law? An expert explains,[/B] [I]"... it is hard to see how this can be anything other than a “use of force” within the meaning of article 2(4) of the UN Charter...Nonetheless, the [u]US intervention in Venezuela was as brazen and unlawful[/u] as its military strike on Iran in June last year. As such, it challenges international law."[/I] [URL]https://theconversation.com/were-the-us-actions-in-venezuela-legal-under-international-law-an-expert-explains-272684[/URL]
The ILLEGAL actions against Venezuela, from your MAGA Fuhrer and Hegseth, [B]ONLY SERVE to bolster, strengthen and reinforce other bad state actors,[/B] like Russia, North Korea, Iran, Saudi Arabia and China, to reenact similar bullshit "law enforcement" claims against neighboring sovereign countries like Taiwan. It's looks like a precursor to more war and was IMHO, just plain dumb! [I]...PERIOD[/I]!
-
Is it the Europeans or Americans, suffering from rising energy bills?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3046307][URL]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14220893/Germanys-wind-power-higher-bills.html[/URL]
Dumbasses! Germany and UK going broke because of Wind and Solar.[/QUOTE]Take a look at this newer [B]Fortune article, dated January 1, 2026,[/B] (about 1 year after your article) and perhaps explain why author thinks, it's Americans suffering from raising energy bills, while it's more common for Europeans to be experiencing lower energy bills and negative electricity prices, largely due to renewables?
[B]Fortune:[/B] Negative prices for electricity are getting more common in Europe and consumer costs have dipped—while Americans face rising energy bills, January 1, 2026 [URL]https://fortune.com/2026/01/01/negative-prices-electricity-european-union-solar-wind-spain-france-germany-us-energy-bills/[/URL].
Note, there's a 3:21 min. Audio transcript, if you can't / don't want to read the article!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046707]Take a look at this newer Fortune article, dated January 1, 2026, (about 1 year after your article) and perhaps explain why author thinks, it's Americans suffering from raising energy bills[/QUOTE]Man, this is just an example of you just seeing what you want to believe versus the truth. First off, the author leaves off European taxes. Why? Do consumers not pay taxes?
Then he shows the electricity Europeans are charged and puts it in Euros. It is about 0. 3 Euros per kilowatt hour. Most people, yourself included, do not know what that means. 0. 3 Euros is 35 cents. The Europeans are paying 35 cents per kilowatt hour.
And in the USA? "Texans on average are paying 16 cents per kilowatt hour which is 12.3% below the national average. The average for the USA in 2024 was 16.5. In 2020, it was 13 cents. So Europe is going from 35 to 34 cents and the USA is gong up from 16 to 17 cents, and the point is we need to do what Europe is doing. Really?
"By contrast, rising electricity prices in the USA Have become a growing source of voter discontent as utilities race to build more capacity to feed skyrocketing demand from AI data centers. "
Yeah, no shit, who wants to build a data center in Europe given their nose bleed electricity costs?
"The higher bills have fueled an overall affordability crisis that started with the post-pandemic inflation spike" Ah yes, your lib journalist fails to mention electricity went up from 13 to 16 cents per kilowatt hour when Biden was president. Gee, I wonder why he left off Biden's names and failed to put down electricity prices.
Wait, where is Trump and tariffs? It has to be there. Everything bad in the economy has to do with tariffs. A libtard journalist didn't mention Trump and tariffs? How can that be?
Oh wait, I did not read the whole sentence. "The higher bills have fueled an overall affordability crisis that started with the post-pandemic inflation spike and was worsened by President Donald Trump's tariffs. "
Ah yes, all is right with the world now. I have no clue what the fuck tariffs have to do with electricity prices but whatever.
Where the griping come is that data centers are playing less for electricity than consumers and using more and more. The reason is "Data centers often pay less for electricity than consumers due to specialized contracts and subsidies negotiated with utilities, which can include discounted rates and upfront payments for infrastructure upgrades. These arrangements are frequently part of incentive packages offered by local governments to attract large tech companies, and the resulting costs of grid upgrades are often spread across all ratepayers, not just the data centers".
Here is a listing of all the data center and the costs of electricity for those centers. [URL]https://dgtlinfra.com/united-states-data-centers/[/URL].
Prices are as low as 5 cents per kilowatt hour in Dallas and 15 cents in San Jose.
And Texas is going to be among the big winners in the AI boom. Because while you libtards are fighting over what type of electricity to build, we will build it all. [URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/12/ai-data-center-flood-texas-on-massive-scale.html[/URL]#text=Everything%20 is%20 bigger%20 in%20 Texas, center%20 developers%20 to%20 the%20 state. Everything is bigger in Texas. That's also true for data center demand in the Lone Star State, where project developers are rushing to cash in on the artificial intelligence boom.
Cheap land and cheap energy are combining to attract a flood of data center developers to the state. The potential demand is so vast that it will be impossible to meet by the end of the decade, energy experts say.
More than 220 gigawatts of big projects have asked to connect to the Texas electric grid by 2030, according to December data from the Electric Reliability Council of Texas. More than 70% of those projects are data centers, according to ERCOT, which manages the Texas power grid.
That's more than twice the Lone Star State's record peak summer demand this year of around 85 gigawatts, and its total available power generation for the season of around 103 gigawatts. Those figures are "crazy big," said Beth Garza, a former ERCOT watchdog.
There is that cheap land line again.
And you and the Dems want Texas and the USA to mimic Europe? You all are out of your damned minds.
-
Trump and Musk are fakers, using fake photos to bullshit as always, about Venezuela. And so shameful Musk with grok, ready for everything for money, totally unrespectful. USA are now really down in toilets, with such guys.
-
Bad Move My Man.
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3046631]You have a lot a nerve complaining about Maduro when Trump has been sucking up to Putin and Kim Jong Un. Why in gods name would any "serious" leader go to North Korea. They don't bother to have elections there and people starve to death.
Oh sure, Putin is the leader of the "democracy" that is Russia. Another life-long dictator who holds fake elections and murders the opposition I. E Navalny.
China, Russia and North Korea fuck with the USA while Trump is in office. I don't like this tough guy talk Trump and crew including the 129 pound soaking wet Steven Miller.
Freedom and democracy you say from the group that tried to overthrow an election. What happened to not getting America into bogged down wars. Someone needs to wake Trump up we know sleeps occasionally while cameras are rolling. LOL.[/QUOTE]Kevin, stop deflecting. Removing Maduro was a total and complete win for Trump, America, and most importantly Venezuela. He did the impossible. The world has wanted Maduro out for years and Trump did the planet a favor.
Now if you want to start a totally separate post on China and Russia and how Trump has handled those nations, then go right ahead. It is bad forum etiquette to be posting about China and Russia in this thread.
-
Fight the Green Scam
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046707]Take a look at this newer [B]Fortune article, dated January 1, 2026,[/B] (about 1 year after your article) and perhaps explain why author thinks, it's Americans suffering from raising energy bills, while it's more common for Europeans to be experiencing lower energy bills and negative electricity prices, largely due to renewables?
[B]Fortune:[/B] Negative prices for electricity are getting more common in Europe and consumer costs have dippedwhile Americans face rising energy bills, January 1, 2026 [URL]https://fortune.com/2026/01/01/negative-prices-electricity-european-union-solar-wind-spain-france-germany-us-energy-bills/[/URL].
Note, there's a 3:21 min. Audio transcript, if you can't / don't want to read the article![/QUOTE]But what about the polution, land waste, and turning USA into China's pawn over rare earth minerals? We will keep doing these loops. Every one knows you make know sense and you are a snake charming green scam pusher by now.
-
Etiquette
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3046751]Kevin, stop deflecting. Removing Maduro was a total and complete win for Trump, America, and most importantly Venezuela. He did the impossible. The world has wanted Maduro out for years and Trump did the planet a favor.
Now if you want to start a totally separate post on China and Russia and how Trump has handled those nations, then go right ahead. It is bad forum etiquette to be posting about China and Russia in this thread.[/QUOTE]A Trumper should be last person to talk about etiquette. You lost me when you made that leap. How do you mean it is a "victory" for Trump. Since when is this about himself personally? He didn't do anyone any favors as what we are left with now in Venezuela is a different dog with the same fleas.
I don't see any of these oil companies rushing to get into Venezuela because it will take years almost 10 and billions of dollars upfront to repair the damaged infrastructure of that nation. It is also quite dangerous and there's no way stabilize Venezuela without sending troops in and that night not work either.
We saw this movie with Iraq. We got rid of Saddam Hussein and Iraq was worse than it was when he was running the place. Did we get to keep the oil? Of course not so I guess you explain why we need go to Greenland and Cuba.
Can you explain how these actions will make any Americans' life better?
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3046777]A Trumper should be last person to talk about etiquette. You lost me when you made that leap. How do you mean it is a "victory" for Trump. Since when is this about himself personally? He didn't do anyone any favors as what we are left with now in Venezuela is a different dog with the same fleas.
I don't see any of these oil companies rushing to get into Venezuela because it will take years almost 10 and billions of dollars upfront to repair the damaged infrastructure of that nation. It is also quite dangerous and there's no way stabilize Venezuela without sending troops in and that night not work either.
We saw this movie with Iraq. We got rid of Saddam Hussein and Iraq was worse than it was when he was running the place. Did we get to keep the oil? Of course not so I guess you explain why we need go to Greenland and Cuba.[/QUOTE]You know what Kevin, you are right! Let's just let dictator's take over all of South America and end Democracy as we know it. I am sure that is going to work out great for the people of South America. Lets never hold any dictators or leader accountable for their actions. Well just look the other way as they rig election after election and stay in power forever while their people literally starve to death and we see levels of inequality that is only written about in science fiction novels.
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3046747]Trump and Musk are fakers, using fake photos to bullshit as always, about Venezuela. And so shameful Musk with grok, ready for everything for money, totally unrespectful. USA are now really down in toilets, with such guys.[/QUOTE]Funny, so stupid Trump now asking his citizens to leave Venezuela, when he made them now in danger with his craziness, when nobody want such a shameful for king of our world. Only no brained Americans could re elect him.
-
So much empathy
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3046820]You know what Kevin, you are right! Let's just let dictator's take over all of South America and end Democracy as we know it. I am sure that is going to work out great for the people of South America. Lets never hold any dictators or leader accountable for their actions. Well just look the other way as they rig election after election and stay in power forever while their people literally starve to death and we see levels of inequality that is only written about in science fiction novels.[/QUOTE]So you're saying we should be fixing that all over the planet right? Or did you just like helping out the South American countries?
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3046660]How can a huge, globally-successful entity like Amazon possibly consider setting up their first ever big deal brick and mortar enterprise smack in the middle of a "Dem-controlled hellhole of rampant crime, welfare queens, trash and blight"?
I mean, wouldn't Amazon have done its due diligence on where American Working Men and Women have good jobs, good paying jobs, live, earn and invest responsibly, show pride of ownership in the American Dream, achieve and succeed enough to warrant the huge investment?[/QUOTE]Do you even read what you link?
As part of the plans, Amazon has proposed building a one-story, 229,000-square-foot building in Orland Park, Illinois.
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orland_Park[/URL], _Illinois.
City is 80% white, elected a Republican mayor, defied and sued the Illinois governor on Covid mandates, and the median income is $85,000.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3046660]Surely they would be looking at setting up such a first time big commitment and endeavor in Hootervile Utah, Pixly Kansas or some other serene Repub MAGA-controlled tumbleweed, rattlesnake and outhouse settlement.[/QUOTE]That sounds like Orland Park and just to refresh your memory Tooms.
[URL]https://time.com/5530386/aoc-amazon-new-york-hq2/[/URL]
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Celebrated Amazon Pulling Out of New York––But the Governor Says It Cost the City 25,000 Jobs.
Hey, Tooms, how many of those great Biden jobs were guys working at Minnesota day care centers? Seeing as Spidy is counting bankruptcies as proof Trump is incompetent, do those day care centers closing argue for your point that Trump is incompetent?
The Spirit Airlines bankruptcy was directly on Biden. Maybe you can find me one bankruptcy Trump is responsible for.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3046704]The U.S. military 1989 invasion of Panama and Venezuela, with the illegal abductions of Noriega and Maduro, while both are characterized and framed as a law-enforcement operations, both operations did unlawfully violated U.S. and International Laws, as both lacked the credible basis for legal military action, in a either courts of law.[/QUOTE]Obama killing an American citizen without a trial? Saying we are good at killing people? Clinton lying under oath? Biden pardoning Hunter Biden after saying he would not? Biden serving as president when he clearly was incapacitated? The robot pardon signatures? Those are all good with you Dems. Capturing Maduro? It is completely illegal and going to lead to problems elsewhere!
Yeah, the world leaders are going to gripe in public about Maduro and state sovereignty in public. Behind closed doors, they are glad that fucker Maduro is gone. Chavez / Maduro stole from everyone!
That you Dems are all up in arms about legality kills me. The only reason that you are griping is because Trump did something that could end up being great, and you hate it. Your TDS is so extreme that you care more about Trump potentially looking good than 30 million people having better lives. That is pretty fucked up.
-
3 photos
The Worst Since a Previous Repub Presidency, part infinity:
Yep, here we go again. And it was as predictable as night following day for anyone with at least two brain cells to rub together and enough cognitive capacity to remember or simply research as far back as, oh, 2024 vs 2020,2017 vs 2008,2001 vs 1992 and so on and so on and so on for the past 100 years.
Otherwise known by Trump and his MAGA Cult as "TDS / Trump Derangement Syndrome. " Lolol.
Gee, who could have predicted such a thing? Everyone who voted for Kamala Harris.
[B]We're in a 'hiring recession,' economist says how job seekers can stand out[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/10/hiring-recession.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]"Its fair to say that [b]2025 was a hiring recession in the United States,[/b] Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, wrote in a note Friday. That recession affects both blue- and white-collar workers, she wrote.
U.S. employers added 584,000 jobs last year, according to a Bureau of Labor Statistics report issued Friday. That marks [b]the worst year for total job gains outside of a recession since 2003[/b], according to Long. There has been little job creation since April, meaning most gains took place early in the year, she wrote.
..........
Long-term unemployment has also climbed. In December, 26% of all unemployed workers had been out of work for at least six months, [b]the highest share since February 2022[/b], according to the BLS.
That suggests unemployment is increasingly becoming a permanent state rather than a temporary transition, Bachaud said.[/QUOTE]
-
No Brained Americans? LOL-- Your Comments are No Brained
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3046821]Funny, so stupid Trump now asking his citizens to leave Venezuela, when he made them now in danger with his craziness, when nobody want such a shameful for king of our world. Only no brained Americans could re elect him.[/QUOTE]You need some new Bullshi- You keep blathering on with the same Dumbass shit.
-
Fake Photos?
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3046747]Trump and Musk are fakers, using fake photos to bullshit as always, about Venezuela. And so shameful Musk with grok, ready for everything for money, totally unrespectful. USA are now really down in toilets, with such guys.[/QUOTE]Why don't you post the fake photos? -- You American hating dickheads are hilarious -- Cry harder.
-
And waiting in the on deck circle is the Jew in CDMX, what cartels?
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3046821]Funny, so stupid Trump now asking his citizens to leave Venezuela, when he made them now in danger with his craziness, when nobody want such a shameful for king of our world. Only no brained Americans could re elect him.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/11/world/americas/trump-latin-america-politics.html?campaign_id=301&emc=edit_ypgu_20260111&instance_id=169127&nl=your-places:-global-update[/URL]®i_id=233280416&segment_id=213503&user_id=273 f0 e7 f0 c7 f50 df8 d381 facde216589.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/border/2026/01/10/spokesman-for-mexicos-ruling-party-claims-cartels-are-one-of-the-nations-largest-employers/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/live/V8zTRvbtyOg[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=FutureDeadGuy;3046888]So you're saying we should be fixing that all over the planet right? Or did you just like helping out the South American countries?[/QUOTE]What the fuck does empathy have to do with removing evil dictators who rape and pillage whole nations? If the USA had the power and support, yes we should remove all evil tyrants around the globe. How is this even a real question? Wait, you actually like Maduro? You realize the only people who support him are the ones he pays off. TDS is strong with this one.
Just curious, as a comparison, did Obama get this heat when he took out Bin Laden because I sure as hell don't remember it?
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3046921][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/11/world/americas/trump-latin-america-politics.html?campaign_id=301&emc=edit_ypgu_20260111&instance_id=169127&nl=your-places:-global-update[/URL]i_id=233280416&segment_id=213503&user_id=273 f0 e7 f0 c7 f50 df8 d381 facde216589.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/border/2026/01/10/spokesman-for-mexicos-ruling-party-claims-cartels-are-one-of-the-nations-largest-employers/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/live/V8zTRvbtyOg[/URL][/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/11/world/americas/trump-latin-america-politics.html[/URL]
-
Epstein Hoax
So when are they going to find Trump visited Epstein Island? Still waiting here. Love all the hoaxes while Trump does not but produce results.
-
Hello
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046897]Obama killing an American citizen without a trial? Saying we are good at killing people? Clinton lying under oath? Biden pardoning Hunter Biden after saying he would not? Biden serving as president when he clearly was incapacitated? The robot pardon signatures? Those are all good with you Dems. Capturing Maduro? It is completely illegal and going to lead to problems elsewhere!
Yeah, the world leaders are going to gripe in public about Maduro and state sovereignty in public. Behind closed doors, they are glad that fucker Maduro is gone. Chavez / Maduro stole from everyone!
That you Dems are all up in arms about legality kills me. The only reason that you are griping is because Trump did something that could end up being great, and you hate it. Your TDS is so extreme that you care more about Trump potentially looking good than 30 million people having better lives. That is pretty fucked up.[/QUOTE]At least Biden was sleeping while cameras are rolling. Who is "running" the country while he sleeping during daylight hours? He needs hospice care. Let's see if we can't procure care for those "cankles" and some of Melania's hand cream for Dumold's use. LOL.
-
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3046929]So when are they going to find Trump visited Epstein Island? Still waiting here. Love all the hoaxes while Trump does not but produce results.[/QUOTE]Which results? War in Minneapolis versus citizens? Trying to rob Ukraine, Venezuela and now Cuba. Bad, he is not able to create as many jobs as previous. Not real MAGA but more bullshits every day. So boring to hear how he is so stupid. USA look so low level people under his image, Vance and Musk.
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3046931]At least Biden was sleeping while cameras are rolling. Who is "running" the country while he sleeping during daylight hours? He needs hospice care. Let's see if we can't procure care for those "cankles" and some of Melania's hand cream for Dumold's use. LOL.[/QUOTE]Why LOL? If Trump is incompetent, why did you dumb asses try to put him in jail? There is a lot that is fair game to criticize Trump and his policies over about but him being mentally incompetent like Biden is not one. Your TDS is so out of control that you need to be ignored.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3046899]Yep, here we go again. And it was as predictable as night following day for anyone with at least two brain cells to rub together and enough cognitive capacity to remember or simply research as far back as, oh, 2024 vs 2020,2017 vs 2008,2001 vs 1992 and so on and so on and so on for the past 100 years.
Otherwise known by Trump and his MAGA Cult as "TDS / Trump Derangement Syndrome. " Lolol.
Gee, who could have predicted such a thing? Everyone who voted for Kamala Harris.
[B]We're in a 'hiring recession,' economist says how job seekers can stand out[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/10/hiring-recession.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL][/QUOTE]How many Democratic jobs were Minnesota day care workers? How many Democratic jobs were on the California high speed rail where not even one mile of track has been built? I talked to a friend in Atlanta. Atlanta had been killing it taking jobs from Hollyweird. Thing is the Teamsters Union has insisted that truckers get paid while their trucks were idled. The movie studios are so sick of it they are moving production abroad and away from Atlanta and those bullshit policies, and my friend has suffered because of that.
Adam Carolla put up a garage, and it pissed him off to see inspectors sitting in their cars while he was paying them. He could not believe how building a garage was so fucking hard and costly in California. He said that he is going to his kid's graduation in a you-haul because as so as his kid graduates he is out of California. And now his house has burnt down. Where were the fucking safety experts then?
It took Bill Maher two years to put up solar panels. Solar panels! How many Democratic jobs are these bullshit "safety" inspectors and "experts"? OMG.
And with real work, I got a buddy running a biz in New York. He needs help but he cannot compete with people on unemployment insurance, but New York has plenty of money for inspectors, and a friend of his is a fireman. He hit 50 and is getting $200,000 a year in retirement pay. That is $6 million if he dies at age 80.
And then we have all the immigrants that are being purged. Yeah, why would we expect job growth if they are tossed? Of course, job growth is going to slow then.
Time after time, all the jobs you Dems brag about is bullshit work. The teamsters job, the safety inspector's job, the Minnesota day care workers, the professors in colleges who teach about white supremacy? They are not doing any real work. If the unemployment rate goes up because they are all fired, that would be an economic boom for the nation.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3046926][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/11/world/americas/trump-latin-america-politics.html[/URL][/QUOTE]LOL. That ranks up there with Spidy's cheap European energy article. God, that is a load of horseshit. The reality is that Maduro's shit politics has loaded Venezuela's neighbors to the gills with costly and often destructive Venezuelan refugees. Like the people Woodman is helping, a lot of the Vennies, more than the majority, are good folks, but there are a lot of thugs among those Vennies too.
Thing is if I put on my conspiracy hat and wanted to rig an election, I would use the Vennies. They are poor, desperate, and in too many cases, immoral. I think there is 2 million Vennies in Colombia. Colombian president Petro owns those people and can deport them at any time. Thing is Petro could give the Vennies passports. If you have a Colombian passport, you can go to Mexico visa free and then storm the border. You are not going to catch all the Vennies if they come it any once.
And we know these Democrats are promoting election fraud with immigrants. Have you noticed not one Dem here has even broached what is going on in Minnesota? I have needled the shit out of them, and they won't talk about it. Instead of being outraged at the fraud, the Democratic lunes are hassling law enforcement / ICE that is trying to clean it up.
Thing about Floyd and Garner is that they were involved in petty crime. Garner sold loose cigarettes to avoid the NY cigarette tax. Floyd was passing a fake $20 bill at a convenience store. Maybe he knew it was fake, but I died of embarrassment one time when I handed a store a fake $10 bill. I did not know the bill was fake so I am sympathetic that even a career criminal like Floyd may not have known either. And the cops are putting those guys in choke holds or putting their knees on necks for THAT? No, no, no. I don't want to hear that Fentanyl Floyd crap. The police force was excessive. Period.
In the recent shooting, this woman was egged on by her lesbian wife to protest ICE. She was there to harass ICE and parked her vehicle the middle of the road. She turned towards an ICE agent and the guy who was afraid for his life shot her. If you are living your life, and the cops fuck with you, you have my sympathy. If you are there to fuck with the cops who are trying to capture thieves and people trying to rig elections, you get no sympathy from me. Hell, I hope more of you supporting cheaters and fraudsters get shot. It saves us the expense of a trial.
If Tampon Timmy was innocent, he would not be stepping down. If the Dems were real Americans, they would be outraged by the taxpayer fraud and election fraud and not outraged by ICE or by Trump enforcing the law. Their silence about Minnesota literally speaks more about election fraud than anything else.
And BTW, the Venezuelan oil that Trump and the USA majors are going to start pumping out after a few years is going to go to China after our refineries have their crack at it. Our refineries are the only ones that can handle Venezuelan sour crude in volume.
There was a book about a British guy in China, and this Chinese manager tried to steal his business, and the Brit hung in there. For 3 years, the Chinaman pulled every stunt he could to steal the guy's business until finally he gave up. Once he realized that he could not pull off that stunt, they worked out a fair deal in less than an hour.
The point is that the Chinese would rather buy from fair minded Americans than the Russians or Iranians any day despite the rhetoric. When you are in business, you want stable and dealing with the Russians who are at war and their supply is not dependable or the crazy Mullahs is anything but stable.
Back in 1995, I took a cruise to see the part of the world destined for growth. I went to Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, and Hong Kong. My takeaway was if this was the up and coming part of the world, I wanted no part of it. It was so crowded, so hectic, and so polluted. The only country I was interested in returning to was Singapore.
The best part of the cruise was an old vet, a Brit in the textiles game who spent decades in India and China. Man, he had some great stories. Anyway, we go from wealthy Singapore to Malaysia which is poorer but okay to Indonesia which is at third world as it gets.
He asked me if I noticed that as we went South the countries that were richer in resources. I said I did, but he also pointed out they were poorer in general. I noticed that too. He then made one other point about the race of the people. He said the more Chinese you have, the more wealth you do, and this is when China was shit economically, and I thought to myself he was right. Singapore was loaded with Chinese whereas Indonesia had very few.
China is always going to be about the buck then. That is what they care about. It is in their genes. If they can get a reliable supplier of fairly priced oil, they will be thrilled.
-
Electrostate v Petrostate: China Powers Online 1 GW offshore solar as America watches
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3046753]But what about the polution, land waste, and turning USA into China's pawn over rare earth minerals? We will keep doing these loops. Every one knows you make know sense and you are a snake charming green scam pusher by now.[/QUOTE][B]China Launches 1GW Offshore Solar Giant While America Watches From Shore,[/B] January 1, 2026 [URL]https://sustainablepowernews.com/china-launches-offshore-solar-giant/[/URL]
New Clean Energy / Environmental Impact:
[LIST] 1GW offshore solar farm combines innovative marine technology with clean energy production, [b]powering 2.6 million homes[/b][/LIST][LIST] Its avoiding 1.34 million tons of CO2 emissions each year. That's equivalent to [b]saving over 500,000 tonnes of coal. [/b][/LIST][LIST] Farming under these panels of fish, seaweed, who knows what else, produces a dual-use marine space, [b]one area, two revenue streams.[/b][/LIST]
[NOPARSE]Hmmm....I wonder if NJ "rubbed their rocks" hard enough together, if they could produce the same amount of clean energy to power 2.6 million [/NOPARSE]homes?
-
The largest data center in the world, located in Europe's Portugal
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046738]And in the USA? "Texans on average are paying 16 cents per kilowatt hour which is 12.3% below the national average. The average for the USA in 2024 was 16.5. In 2020, it was 13 cents. So Europe is going from 35 to 34 cents and the USA is gong up from 16 to 17 cents, and the point is we need to do what Europe is doing. Really?[/QUOTE]Texas has nothing on Virginia (the data capital center of the world), when it come to data centers. [URL]https://www.axios.com/local/richmond/2025/08/06/electricity-costs-bills-data-centers-ai-virginia[/URL] Whom, BTW, saw Dems sweep and win 13 state seats, for a majority in the house, in the 2025 Elections "Big Blue Wave", in Virginia, based primarily on two election issues; the rise in electricity prices and affordability. Let's hope Texas suffers the same fate, with their data center ambitions!
Yes, we know Texas, has some of the lowest electricity in the country, but tell that to Virginians, facing significant increases in electricity costs due to data centers, with estimates suggesting that data centers accounted for 63% of electricity price increases, for the coming year. [B]Virginia Regulators Approve New Dominion Rates, Assign More Costs to Data Centers,[/B] January 7, 2026, [URL]https://insideclimatenews.org/news/07012026/virginia-regulators-approve-new-dominion-rates/[/URL]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3046738]"By contrast, rising electricity prices in the USA Have become a growing source of voter discontent as utilities race to build more capacity to feed skyrocketing demand from AI data centers. "
Yeah, no shit, who wants to build a data center in Europe given their nose bleed electricity costs? ...
And you and the Dems want Texas and the USA to mimic Europe? You all are out of your damned minds. [/QUOTE]Right, cause idiots like Bill Gates, decide to invest $10 billion dollars in the largest data center in the world, located in Europe's Portugal, SINES Start Campus, 1 GW data center, for no good reason, right? [URL]https://sustainabilitymag.com/articles/about-sin01-start-campus-new-ai-and-hpc-ready-data-centre[/URL] AND [URL]https://www.startcampus.pt/[/URL].
Funny, you once said Europe couldn't compete in the AI and data center arena. How wrong you were, thinking such nonsense. So much for MAGA think!
-
What right-wing media don't tell ya?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3046929]So when are they going to find Trump visited Epstein Island? Still waiting here. Love all the hoaxes while Trump does not but produce results.[/QUOTE]Still watching FOXY Muse are we? Good luck with that!
BTW, is NJ, still looking at "rubbing rocks" together to generate gigawatts of energy?
-
3 photos
Uh
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047022]How many Democratic jobs were Minnesota day care workers? How many Democratic jobs were on the California high speed rail where not even one mile of track has been built? I talked to a friend in Atlanta. Atlanta had been killing it taking jobs from Hollyweird. Thing is the Teamsters Union has insisted that truckers get paid while their trucks were idled. The movie studios are so sick of it they are moving production abroad and away from Atlanta and those bullshit policies, and my friend has suffered because of that.
Adam Carolla put up a garage, and it pissed him off to see inspectors sitting in their cars while he was paying them. He could not believe how building a garage was so fucking hard and costly in California. He said that he is going to his kid's graduation in a you-haul because as so as his kid graduates he is out of California. And now his house has burnt down. Where were the fucking safety experts then?
It took Bill Maher two years to put up solar panels. Solar panels! How many Democratic jobs are these bullshit "safety" inspectors and "experts"? OMG..[/QUOTE]ADP and the BLS have always been well aware of and note the difference between private-sector jobs created and government jobs created. In fact, private-sector jobs is the only thing ADP tracks.
In both cases, their reports are that Trump's 2025 policies created only 25-30% of the jobs created by Biden's policies in 2024.
Don't you even read the links I post that you think I don't read?
That link states the big drop off in 2025 jobs created due to Trump's failed policies started in April of that year. That was when his "Liberation From Your Job Day" of across-the-board tariffs was established.
The Minnesota scandal has been prosecuted and perps have been convicted and jailed for it since 2022. Nothing new occurred regarding any of it last year or this year except MAGAs digging it up as potential distraction from their lord and savior's disastrous 2nd term as so-called president.
Adam Carolla is such a Winger idiot about politics and the economy he repeatedly complains about how impossible it was for him to find a job at the worst time to find a job in his lifetime because "there were NO jobs available and I tried everything" and then cites that year as 1983. But he is too stupid to know 1983 was Repub Ronald Reagan's THIRD year as so-called president and his economic philosophy, tax and economic policies were modeled after those of The Great Depression architects Repubs Coolidge and Hoover and have continued to be the template followed by almost every Repub since, including Worst Jobs Creation President Since Herbert Hoover, Donald Trump.
And Bill Maher is such a Lying MAGA Talking Points Liar now he continues to repeat some total bullshit about Dems thinking a man can get pregnant, want to conduct sex change operations on children and tried to defund the police when he has never in his life met a Dem or Dem policy leader who believes or ever tried to legislate such a thing. And he lives happily in Hollywood / Southern Califirnia with zero plan to ever move away from that area and "those people" to live among MAGALoons the same as Adam Carolla.
-
[QUOTE=Woodman09;3046903]Why don't you post the fake photos? -- You American hating dickheads are hilarious -- Cry harder.[/QUOTE]Yes, both used fake photos about Venezuela. Musk fake from AI and the old orange used a photo which was not about Venezuela. Except no brained who re elected him after he fucked constitution and Capitol, we can't trust these 2 who try to fuck our world. Can only wish it won t last for too long.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047050][B]China Launches 1GW Offshore Solar Giant While America Watches From Shore,[/B] January 1, 2026 [URL]https://sustainablepowernews.com/china-launches-offshore-solar-giant/[/URL]
New Clean Energy / Environmental Impact:
[LIST] 1GW offshore solar farm combines innovative marine technology with clean energy production, [b]powering 2.6 million homes[/b][/LIST][LIST] Its avoiding 1.34 million tons of CO2 emissions each year. That's equivalent to [b]saving over 500,000 tonnes of coal. [/b][/LIST][LIST] Farming under these panels of fish, seaweed, who knows what else, produces a dual-use marine space, [b]one area, two revenue streams.[/b][/LIST]
[NOPARSE]Hmmm....I wonder if NJ "rubbed their rocks" hard enough together, if they could produce the same amount of clean energy to power 2.6 million [/NOPARSE]homes?[/QUOTE]How much gas was used to mine for the batteries and rare earth metals which will back up this system that is destroying ocean environment? How much energy is lost on misty days? In ten years when the panels need to be replaced, that is literally 5 square miles of plastic panels wasted and polluting the environment. How much did the batteries cost?
5 square miles of pristine ocean to generate electricity than can't even produce electricity at night or in bad weather. Yea that makes a ton sense.
Keep up the scam though.
-
Please accept my apology
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047018]Why LOL? If Trump is incompetent, why did you dumb asses try to put him in jail? There is a lot that is fair game to criticize Trump and his policies over about but him being mentally incompetent like Biden is not one. Your TDS is so out of control that you need to be ignored.[/QUOTE]I was wrong to have the nerve to criticize Trump. I remember as small child learning about ALDS -Abraham Lincoln Derangement Syndrome. Now that Trump has declared himself the acting president of Venezuela he will move there and give us Americans a break from his nonsense that is truly deserved.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3047078]The Minnesota scandal has been prosecuted and perps have been convicted and jailed for it since 2022. Nothing new occurred regarding any of it last year or this year except MAGAs digging it up as potential distraction from their lord and savior's disastrous 2nd term as so-called president.[/QUOTE]Sometimes, a response is so dumb it needs to sit by itself. Uh, Tooms, why is Tampon Timmy sitting down? Why did CBS news say they were going to cover the news differently?
Those are rhetorical questions. I have zero interest in your response.
-
Fraud and stealing aka coin of the realm for the Democrats
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047032]LOL. That ranks up there with Spidy's cheap European energy article. God, that is a load of horseshit. The reality is that Maduro's shit politics has loaded Venezuela's neighbors to the gills with costly and often destructive Venezuelan refugees. Like the people Woodman is helping, a lot of the Vennies, more than the majority, are good folks, but there are a lot of thugs among those Vennies too.
Thing is if I put on my conspiracy hat and wanted to rig an election, I would use the Vennies. They are poor, desperate, and in too many cases, immoral. I think there is 2 million Vennies in Colombia. Colombian president Petro owns those people and can deport them at any time. Thing is Petro could give the Vennies passports. If you have a Colombian passport, you can go to Mexico visa free and then storm the border. You are not going to catch all the Vennies if they come it any once..[/QUOTE]I've been reading 31 billion was stolen in 1 year, 26 billion by foreign gangs, the woman in charge was Julie Su yes that Julie Su just hired my moron mamdani.
[URL]https://www.kjct8.com/2021/01/26/california-criminal-rings-loot-billions-in-jobless-funds/[/URL]
[URL]https://www-aljazeera-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2026/1/12/which-countries-host-the-largest-venezuelan-populations?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQGsAEggAID[/URL]#amp_tf=From%20%251%24's&aoh=17682608914788&csi=0&referrer=https%3 A%2 F%2 F [URL]www.google.com[/URL]&share=https%3 A%2 F%2 F[URL]www.aljazeera.com[/URL]%2 Fnews%2 F2026%2 F1%2 F12%2 Fwhich-countries-host-the-largest-venezuelan-populations.
[URL]https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/visualized-ocean-plastic-waste-pollution-by-country/[/URL]
Asia is one huge toilet, massive rats, roaches and bed bugs (why those greedy bastards on Wall St love it so).
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbzX2g0V4os[/URL]
I was swimming on a beach in Bali and wound up in a Bronze Age like ER.
I told them I had been swimming and they said OHHH it rained the other day.
I said ok? They said when it rains ALL sewage goes into the ocean including the beaches.
I had to wait to get treated in the USA for a horrible ear infection.
You mention Chinese merchants yes the diaspora is very aggressive about making / stealing money and they are strongly disliked everywhere they go.
Kinda like Jews LOL.
I've seen much of Asia and much of Latin America.
Latin America beats Asia on every single metric if you compare the two, except one.
Crime, that said I've spent a lot of time in both, and I've never had an issue in either so to me its moot (at least so far).
If you stay away from drugs and know how to handle yourself, trouble seems to look for easier targets.
And I have seen many / most of the worst areas of Latin America.
Its cool to be walking down the street in Bogota or Lima and a local is wearing a USA flag shirt or riding a bike with an actual American flag.
You will never see that in Asia (except the PI they speak English are Catholic and love Uncle Sam.
I absolutely love Latin America.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047060]Texas has nothing on Virginia (the data capital center of the world), when it come to data centers. Whom, BTW, saw Dems sweep and win 13 state seats, for a majority in the house, in the 2025 Elections "Big Blue Wave", in Virginia, based primarily on two election issues; the rise in electricity prices and affordability. Let's hope Texas suffers the same fate, with their data center ambitions!
Yes, we know Texas, has some of the lowest electricity in the country, but tell that to Virginians, facing significant increases in electricity costs due to data centers, with estimates suggesting that data centers accounted for 63% of electricity price increases, for the coming year.[/QUOTE]So is having data centers good or bad? Do you want Texas to have higher energy costs? Or Virginia to have them? What similar fate do you want to Texas to suffer? Higher energy costs? More data centers? Turning blue? Given your knack for taking both sides of an issue, the answer to all these questions must be yes and no. If you are going to say I am wrong, maybe you should make sure what your position is.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047060]Right, cause idiots like Bill Gates, decide to invest $10 billion dollars in the largest data center in the world, located in Europe's Portugal, SINES Start Campus, 1 GW data center, for no good reason, right?[/QUOTE]And now Bill Gates, who wrote a book that climate change was bad and that hypocritically said climate change was nothing, is a genius. I thought Gates was an evil, stupid, self serving billionaire in your eyes. So, is Gates bad or good? We can put down yes and no to that question too.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047060]Funny, you once said Europe couldn't compete in the AI and data center arena. How wrong you were, thinking such nonsense. So much for MAGA think![/QUOTE]Yeesh. I am so much smarter than you Elvis because of how I vote. Any moron can vote for a Democrat, you fool. Europe cannot compete with China when it comes to the cost of producing cars, yet Europe still produces cars. How is that possible? You think that you are so smart when you say the dumbest things.
This was from the NYT and of course it had the usual Trump is dumb comments strewn in, but there was some good information: Sprawling solar farms, windmills and hydroelectric dams are the best energy options for the planet, and usually the cheapest. Their economic upside has made them, collectively, the fastest-growing power source for data centers worldwide.
But renewables often can't shoulder the load alone, despite being a major part of the A. I. Power plan. That's because servers hum and whir around the clock — not just when the sun is up or the wind is blowing. They demand a constant, stable flow of electricity. If power falters, even for a few seconds, companies lose thousands of dollars, sometimes more.
Companies can pair solar and wind farms with massive batteries that store power and then release it in a steady stream. But storing energy that way is relatively pricey and may still fall short of providing the nonstop energy that data centers need. "Batteries are a great way to shift daytime electricity to evening electricity — but not a great way to shift July electricity to January electricity.
So even the greenest facilities rely on fossil fuels or the local grid for backup.
The biggest data center campuses will consume multiple gigawatts of power. To continuously produce just a single gigawatt, a renewable-energy plant would need around 12.5 million solar panels — enough to cover nearly 5,000 football fields. Wind turbines would need even more room. Many data centers near cities and towns don't have that kind of space.
And this is what Ram was smacking you around about. Oh, solar is cheaper but let's leave out land costs. Solar is cheaper but let's leave out battery costs. Solar is cheaper but let's leave out the costs of fossil fuel backup. Solar is cheaper but only when the sun is shining and the sunlight is bright. Solar is cheaper but if you have a grid overly dependent on solar and wind as Spain and Portugal do, blackouts will be more frequent and blackouts cost data centers millions of dollars.
So solar is not always cheaper nor better. And if you look at where there is plenty of sun, wind, and cheap land, the most cost effective place to be is West Texas. Texas is not Virginia. Our potential for alternative energy generation is practically unlimited.
-
3 photos
Uh
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047106]Sometimes, a response is so dumb it needs to sit by itself. Uh, Tooms, why is Tampon Timmy sitting down? Why did CBS news say they were going to cover the news differently?
Those are rhetorical questions. I have zero interest in your response.[/QUOTE]Trump's 2nd term typically crap Repub Jobs creation record so far, especially compared to the nearest Dem president's results, was not caused my a Minnesota scandal that was initially investigated and prosecuted by Joe Biden's DOJ back in 2022.
And neither was Trump's 1st term typically crap Repub Jobs creation results.
Or GW Bush's.
Or GHW Bush's.
Or Reagan's.
Or Nixon / Ford's.
Or Eisenhower's.
Or Hoover's.
Etc.
But keep trying. Maybe you will eventually come up with some lame excuse so dumb, numskull MAGAs Adam Carolla and Bill Maher will repeat it over and over again on their shows for you.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3047109]I've been reading 31 billion was stolen in 1 year, 26 billion by foreign gangs, the woman in charge was Julie Su yes that Julie Su just hired my moron mamdani.
https://www.kjct8.com/2021/01/26/california-criminal-rings-loot-billions-in-jobless-funds/[/QUOTE]In 2020, when the Dems said that was the fairest election in history, I was like, are you fucking kidding me? But the Republicans tried to change things after the fact which was not going to happen. I was like Republicans you have to stop these guys before the election and they did not do enough because you cannot expect judges to over turn things, and they have learned and are getting judges involved before the full vote is cast. We all know the immigrants are being bribed with our tax dollars to vote Dem. The modern Dem has no morals. They think Trump is so evil that bribing immigrants to vote their way is okay.
I did not know we had close to a million Vennies here. That is enough to flip any election. I actually think that is the real reason Trump took Maduro out not gold not oil but to deport any of the Vennies taking money to vote Dem. I expect Trump to build a Guantanamo like structure there, and to deport any immigrant who illegally votes in an election, and that is fine with me. Illegals voting in an election is not cute. It is as big a threat to our Democracy as Hitler was. They are stealing the USA blind.
[URL]https://www-aljazeera-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2026/1/12/which-countries-host-the-largest-venezuelan-populations?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQGsAEggAID[/URL]#amp_tf=From%20%251%24's&aoh=17682608914788&csi=0&referrer=https%3 A%2 F%2 F [URL]www.google.com[/URL]&share=https%3 A%2 F%2 F [URL]www.aljazeera.com[/URL]%2 Fnews%2 F2026%2 F1%2 F12%2 Fwhich-countries-host-the-largest-venezuelan-populations.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3047109]I was swimming on a beach in Bali and wound up in a Bronze Age like ER.
I told them I had been swimming and they said OHHH it rained the other day.
I said ok? They said when it rains ALL sewage goes into the ocean including the beaches.
I had to wait to get treated in the USA for a horrible ear infection.
You mention Chinese merchants yes the diaspora is very aggressive about making / stealing money and they are strongly disliked everywhere they go.
Kinda like Jews LOL.
I've seen much of Asia and much of Latin America.
Latin America beats Asia on every single metric if you compare the two, except one.
Crime, that said I've spent a lot of time in both, and I've never had an issue in either so to me its moot (at least so far).
If you stay away from drugs and know how to handle yourself, trouble seems to look for easier targets.
And I have seen many / most of the worst areas of Latin America.
Its cool to be walking down the street in Bogota or Lima and a local is wearing a USA flag shirt or riding a bike with an actual American flag.
You will never see that in Asia (except the PI they speak English are Catholic and love Uncle Sam.
I absolutely love Latin America.[/QUOTE]Yeah, and Bali Indonesia is one of the few places in Asia where you have enough space to actually breathe. It is beautiful but not maintained well, and the people there love to rip off tourists.
The big difference between nation building in Venezuela versus Afghanistan or Iraq is that it is a Christian nation. Culturally, our values are the same. Individually, I like Muslims, but most of their governments are fucked up. My father was raised Muslim, and he hated the religious people. He said more people died in the name of religion than anything else, and I think he was right.
Christianity was violent too, but that was when only the priests had access to the Bible. Once everyone did and could read the Bible and Jesus saying, "Love God and Love your neighbor", IMO that changed everything. Anybody who thinks the Christian world was violent is not looking at other cultures.
Given how young Latin America is and was, I was much more interested in the growth of their economies than Asian ones. Maybe they were not going to soar as much, but I enjoyed visiting them. Asia was far, a lot of it is dirty, and crowded. But Latin America is spread out, nice weather. People are / were friendly. The women moving their hips like they did blew me away. And unlike going to Europe, there is no jet lag, and things were like a third the price of Europe.
It amazes me why Latin America so often is not on the list of places people are interested in traveling to, and I think the reason is the fear of crime. Thing is the crime varies so much. In Rio, people brag about not getting mugged, but in nearby Buenos Aires, you do not see much of that. And when you start talking Chile and Uruguay, you are probably safer there than most of the USA.
-
Many overlook the census issue
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047188]In 2020, when the Dems said that was the fairest election in history, I was like, are you fucking kidding me? But the Republicans tried to change things after the fact which was not going to happen. I was like Republicans you have to stop these guys before the election and they did not do enough because you cannot expect judges to over turn things, and they have learned and are getting judges involved before the full vote is cast. We all know the immigrants are being bribed with our tax dollars to vote Dem. The modern Dem has no morals. They think Trump is so evil that bribing immigrants to vote their way is okay.
I did not know we had close to a million Vennies here. That is enough to flip any election. I actually think that is the real reason Trump took Maduro out not gold not oil but to deport any of the Vennies taking money to vote Dem. I expect Trump to build a Guantanamo like structure there, and to deport any immigrant who illegally votes in an election, and that is fine with me. Illegals voting in an election is not cute. It is as big a threat to our Democracy as Hitler was. They are stealing the USA blind.
[URL]https://www-aljazeera-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2026/1/12/which-countries-host-the-largest-venezuelan-populations?amp_gsa=1&_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQGsAEggAID[/URL]#amp_tf=From%20%251%24's&aoh=17682608914788&csi=0&referrer=https%3 A%2 F%2 F [URL]www.google.com[/URL]&share=https%3 A%2 F%2 F [URL]www.aljazeera.com[/URL]%2 Fnews%2 F2026%2 F1%2 F12%2 Fwhich-countries-host-the-largest-venezuelan-populations.
Yeah, and Bali Indonesia is one of the few places in Asia where you have enough space to actually breathe. It is beautiful but not maintained well, and the people there love to rip off tourists.
The big difference between nation building in Venezuela versus Afghanistan or Iraq is that it is a Christian nation. Culturally, our values are the same. Individually, I like Muslims, but most of their governments are fucked up. My father was raised Muslim, and he hated the religious people. He said more people died in the name of religion than anything else, and I think he was right.
Christianity was violent too, but that was when only the priests had access to the Bible. Once everyone did and could read the Bible and Jesus saying, "Love God and Love your neighbor", IMO that changed everything. Anybody who thinks the Christian world was violent is not looking at other cultures.
Given how young Latin America is and was, I was much more interested in the growth of their economies than Asian ones. Maybe they were not going to soar as much, but I enjoyed visiting them. Asia was far, a lot of it is dirty, and crowded. But Latin America is spread out, nice weather. People are / were friendly. The women moving their hips like they did blew me away. And unlike going to Europe, there is no jet lag, and things were like a third the price of Europe.
It amazes me why Latin America so often is not on the list of places people are interested in traveling to, and I think the reason is the fear of crime. Thing is the crime varies so much. In Rio, people brag about not getting mugged, but in nearby Buenos Aires, you do not see much of that. And when you start talking Chile and Uruguay, you are probably safer there than most of the USA.[/QUOTE]The Census doesn't track illegals, its just a body count.
That's how California gets so many House seats.
That needs to change, the census needs proof of citizenship.
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/voter-id-elon-musk/2024/11/10/id/1187471/[/URL]
Same with voter ID.
I believe the reasons CCPland outperforms Latin America.
Has a lot to do with Communism, the US built up Japan and SK and thought if they did the same with China they would neutralize the CCP that didn't happen.
They just built up its nuclear arsenal for them instead.
The other reason is numbers, depending on what countries you count Asia has about 4-5 billion dirt cheap slaves and Wall St was all in for some very very cheap slavery.
W / o Environmental Laws Labor Laws etc etc.
I believe the best global alliance for the US is with Latin American and the Middle Eastern countries (and Russia of course).
We are all Caucasians, and the CCP hates us (because they ain't us LOL) just look at the Uyghurs.
-
3 photos
Uh
Elvis 2008:
[QUOTE]In 2020, when the Dems said that was the fairest election in history, I was like, are you fucking kidding me? But the Republicans tried to change things after the fact which was not going to happen. I was like Republicans you have to stop these guys before the election and they did not do enough because you cannot expect judges to over turn things, and they have learned and are getting judges involved before the full vote is cast. We all know the immigrants are being bribed with our tax dollars to vote Dem. The modern Dem has no morals. They think Trump is so evil that bribing immigrants to vote their way is okay.[/QUOTE]Ahem.
[B]Trumps own officials say 2020 was Americas most secure election in history.
Homeland Security put out a statement with state and local officials that countered the presidents fraud claims.
Nov. 14, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.vox.com/2020/11/13/21563825/2020-elections-most-secure-dhs-cisa-krebs[/URL]
[QUOTE]The 2020 US election was the most secure in American history, according to US elections officials.
The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. Right now, across the country, election officials are reviewing and double-checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result, the coordinating bodies on election infrastructure and security said in a joint statement issued by the [b]Department of Homeland Securitys Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)[/b].
The statement directly contradicts President Donald Trump, who has made unfounded allegations of widespread voting irregularities and fraud. The president is using these claims to challenge the vote counts in several key states that delivered President-elect Joe Biden his apparent Electoral College victory.[/QUOTE][B]Voter data expert hired by Trump campaign says 2020 election was not stolen.
1/2/2024[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4385239-voter-data-expert-trump-campaign-2020-election-not-stolen/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Ken Block, whom the Trump campaign hired in 2020 to find voter fraud in the election, penned an op-ed Tuesday stating unequivocally that the 2020 presidential election was not stolen and that there was no evidence of voter fraud sufficient to change the outcome of the election.[/QUOTE][B]Trump spread claims of election fraud debunked by his own legal team, Jan. 6 panel says.
Former AG Barr thought former president had become detached from reality
June 13, 2022[/B]
[URL]https://coloradonewsline.com/2022/06/13/trump-spread-claims-of-election-fraud-debunked-by-his-own-legal-team-jan-6-panel-says/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Fraud claims were also referred to the USA Department of Justice, then led by[b] Attorney General Bill Barr. [/b].
In taped testimony, Barr described "an avalanche of all these allegations of fraud that built up over a number of days. ".
The early claims "were completely bogus and silly and usually based on complete misinformation," Barr said.
In a late November meeting in the Oval Office, Trump pressured Barr to involve the Justice Department in the fraud investigations. Barr told the president the department would investigate specific allegations of fraud that could have swung the election, but that claims to that point were "just not meritorious. ".
Later, Trump asked Barr specifically about ballots in Detroit, where boxes were seen transported to a vote-counting station. Barr told Trump that that was to be expected as part of the city's process to centralize vote counting among its 600-plus precincts, Barr said.
Barr said he told Trump the fraud claims he was making to the public were "bulls* a comment also aired by the committee in its initial Thursday night hearing.
"I told him that it was crazy stuff and they were wasting their time on it and it was doing great, great disservice to the country," Barr said.
"he's become detached from reality if he really believes this stuff," Barr said he remembered thinking at the time. [/QUOTE]Obviously, somebody is watching way, way, way too much Fux News and nothing else. Lololol.
-
Electrotech: Germany's largest offshore wind farm with 15 GW turbines
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3047090]How much gas was used to mine for the batteries and rare earth metals which will back up this system that is destroying ocean environment? How much energy is lost on misty days? In ten years when the panels need to be replaced, that is literally 5 square miles of plastic panels wasted and polluting the environment. How much did the batteries cost?
5 square miles of pristine ocean to generate electricity than can't even produce electricity at night or in bad weather. Yea that makes a ton sense.
Keep up the scam though.[/QUOTE]Germany's largest offshore wind farm under construction, EnBW's he Dreiht, just hit a big milestone: The first enormous turbine is now up in the North Sea. [B]The first giant 15 MW turbine is up at Germany's largest offshore wind farm,[/B] [URL]https://electrek.co/2025/04/28/the-first-giant-15-mw-turbine-is-up-at-germanys-largest-offshore-wind-farm/[/URL].
Clearly the wind turbine tech in Germany is growing and expanding at fast pace and have none of those concerns, as their offshore wind farms are new putting up 15 GW turbines.
BTW, when will we see 15 GW of "rubbing rocks" together GW energy being produced, in NJ?
-
Greenland prime minister say they prefer Denmark than Trump. Nobody want Trump.
-
Asia blows, its mostly dominated / bullied by the CCP
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047188]In 2020, when the Dems said that was the fairest election in history, I was like, are you fucking kidding me? But the Republicans tried to change things after the fact which was not going to happen. I was like Republicans you have to stop these guys before the election and they did not do enough because you cannot expect judges to over turn things, and they have learned and are getting judges involved before the full vote is cast. We all know the immigrants are being bribed with our tax dollars to vote Dem. The modern Dem has no morals. They think Trump is so evil that bribing immigrants to vote their way is okay.
I did not know we had close to a million Vennies here. That is enough to flip any election. I actually think that is the real reason Trump took Maduro out not gold not oil but to deport any of the Vennies taking money to vote Dem. I expect Trump to build a Guantanamo like structure there, and to deport any immigrant who illegally votes in an election, and that is fine with me. Illegals voting in an election is not cute. It is as big a threat to our Democracy as Hitler was. They are stealing the USA blind..[/QUOTE]And the CCP is a bunch of racist atheists, they really really hate whites and Muslims, even in CCPland anyone not a Han is an outsider.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/04/world/asia/china-russia-xi-putin.html[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047225]Germany's largest offshore wind farm under construction, EnBW's he Dreiht, just hit a big milestone: The first enormous turbine is now up in the North Sea. [B]The first giant 15 MW turbine is up at Germany's largest offshore wind farm,[/B] [URL]https://electrek.co/2025/04/28/the-first-giant-15-mw-turbine-is-up-at-germanys-largest-offshore-wind-farm/[/URL].
Clearly the wind turbine tech in Germany is growing and expanding at fast pace and have none of those concerns, as their offshore wind farms are new putting up 15 GW turbines.
BTW, when will we see 15 GW of "rubbing rocks" together GW energy being produced, in NJ?[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/germanys-weak-winds-trigger-record-surge-gas-fired-power-maguire-2024-12-04/[/URL]
Lets just hope those wind speeds pick up so the lights go on at night. Hahahahaha. I feel bad for all those ex-Nazi sons of bitchs they fell for that scam wind and solar shit. WW2 guilt did them in lololol.
Bro, Jersey shore summers are great. Go to the beach, fishing, boating, but best of all Velcro- Electricity is on 24 hours a day 365 days a year hahaha. So glad we have nuclear and didn't get dupped by AOC scum bag green new snake charm LOL.
How you going to feel when Iran falls? Trump is the Hydra of the right that the legends foretold. The Ancient Aztec prophecy of a golden god from the North who will swoop down and strike sonic blasts which explode his enemies heads are coming to fruition. Them dictators all playing ball now knowing Golden Donald can scoop them when ever he wants. Sonic Boom!! Lololol.
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-used-sonic-weapon-venezuelan-troops-report-shared-leavitt-claims[/URL]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ii6mXrVDtZU[/URL]
-
SINES Start Campus, $60 billion dollar data center, located in Europe
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047114]So is having data centers good or bad? Do you want Texas to have higher energy costs? Or Virginia to have them? What similar fate do you want to Texas to suffer? Higher energy costs? More data centers? Turning blue? Given your knack for taking both sides of an issue, the answer to all these questions must be yes and no. If you are going to say I am wrong, maybe you should make sure what your position is.[/QUOTE]Dude, if you have any analytical skills at all, you'll see the data presented, paints a very different picture, than the MAGA nonsense, you're often peddling.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047114]Yeesh. I am so much smarter than you Elvis because of how I vote. Any moron can vote for a Democrat, you fool. [/QUOTE]You said it dude, once a fool, always a fool! You should know. BTW, is this your way of telling me, like thousands of other Repubs, you have voter buyer's remorse? However, I find it interestingly funny, how your MAGA Fuhrer, only seems to punish and unlawfully, withhold or cut fed funds from Blue States that didn't vote for him.
But you are right, it really does take a special kind of fool, [B][i]to vote for your MAGA Fuhrer...twice (2x)[/i][/B] after a failed insurrection, 2 x impeached, 4 x indicted, loser of $83 million sexual defamation case and found guilty of 34 criminal felony counts of falsifying business records.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047114]Europe cannot compete with China when it comes to the cost of producing cars, yet Europe still produces cars. How is that possible? You think that you are so smart when you say the dumbest things.[/QUOTE]Nice strongman argument, but this particular debate is about Europe competing on data centers, not producing cars.
[B]EU pushes new AI strategy to reduce tech reliance on US and China.[/B] The EU must promote homegrown artificial intelligence platforms and decrease its reliance on foreign providers, Brussels has said, as it prepares to set out a new plan to compete against the US and China in the global race for the revolutionary technology. [URL]https://www.ft.com/content/ea3d20ed-5b42-45ce-8155-67ef472ae9df[/URL].
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047114]So even the greenest facilities rely on fossil fuels or the local grid for backup.[/QUOTE]Since data centers, like SINES Start Campus, are a top of the line, Tier IV facility, their annual downtime is like less than 1 hour. But in the invent they need longer backup-times from their generators, they use bio-fuels and then [U]as a last resort[/U] fossil fuel diesel if needed.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047114]Solar is cheaper but if you have a grid overly dependent on solar and wind as Spain and Portugal do, blackouts will be more frequent and blackouts cost data centers millions of dollars.[/QUOTE]Good point, but I think they've learnt a great deal from that blackout and now have installed battery grid forming inverters. Also SINES Start Campus, is a Tier IV data center facility and have backup bio-fuel generators, with additional battery backup in the coming future.
One of the best things they learnt from the blackout mistake, was how quickly this new flexible renewable grid, was able to restart from a blackout. What typically would take 1 or 2 days to power up from a nationwide black-start, only took 12 hours.
SINES Start Campus, is a state of the art data center, located in Europe. When finished, it will be like a $60 billion dollar facility, perhaps the best in the world.
-
Circle back to the debate, when you finally understand what LCOE is, yeah?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047114]The biggest data center campuses will consume multiple gigawatts of power. ... Oh, solar is cheaper but let's leave out land costs. Solar is cheaper but let's leave out battery costs. Solar is cheaper but let's leave out the costs of fossil fuel backup. Solar is cheaper but let's leave out the costs of fossil fuel backup. Solar is cheaper but only when the sun is shining and the sunlight is bright. ...
So solar is not always cheaper nor better. And if you look at where there is plenty of sun, wind, and cheap land, the most cost effective place to be is West Texas. Texas is not Virginia. Our potential for alternative energy generation is practically unlimited. [/QUOTE][I][b]Duh!...Thats exactly what an LCOE is, when asked several times to present the lowest cost of energy![/b][/I]
Again for the uninitiated, if you don't understand, this is how analysts determine, across multiply energy sources, which is the lowest cost of energy.
[U]Definition of LCOE:[/U]
[LIST]The levelized cost of electricity/energy (LCOE), is a measure that calculates the average cost of electricity generation over the lifetime of a power plant, taking into account all costs associated with building and operating the plant divided by the total electricity produced. It is used to compare the cost-effectiveness of different energy generation technologies.[/LIST]
For weeks now, I'm been asking RamDavidson84, to provide FACTs and EVIDENCE, of an another energy generation source, that has lower or cheaper LCOE than solar, wind and / or solar or wind and batteries. And what do I get. Nothing but, [I][b]shuckin' and jivin' nonsense,[/b][/I] about "rubbing rocks" and wind turbines are a SCAM. Yeah, wind turbines that have, literally been around, generating energy, since the mid-19th century.
So now you chime in, [I]to do what exactly?[b]...co-sign[/b][/I] his nonsensical babbling "rubbing rocks" and wind SCAM, idiocy?
Do me a favor and STOP wasting my time, with all the bloviating MAGA nonsense, and for once in your lives, do a bit of homework and research into what you're debating, instead of simply repeating what comes out of your MAGA Fuhrer's mouth.
-
All filthy Deep State Scum, WTF why No George Conway quotes? Or George Will
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3047211]Elvis 2008:
Ahem.
[B]Trumps own officials say 2020 was Americas most secure election in history.
Homeland Security put out a statement with state and local officials that countered the presidents fraud claims.
Nov. 14, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.vox.com/2020/11/13/21563825/2020-elections-most-secure-dhs-cisa-krebs[/URL]
[B]Voter data expert hired by Trump campaign says 2020 election was not stolen.
1/2/2024[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4385239-voter-data-expert-trump-campaign-2020-election-not-stolen/[/URL]
[B]Trump spread claims of election fraud debunked by his own legal team, Jan. 6 panel says.
Former AG Barr thought former president had become detached from reality
June 13, 2022[/B]
[URL]https://coloradonewsline.com/2022/06/13/trump-spread-claims-of-election-fraud-debunked-by-his-own-legal-team-jan-6-panel-says/[/URL]
Obviously, somebody is watching way, way, way too much Fux News and nothing else. Lololol.[/QUOTE][URL]https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/31/how-the-2020-election-was-rigged/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3047211]Elvis 2008:
Ahem.
Trumps own officials say 2020 was Americas most secure election in history.
Homeland Security put out a statement with state and local officials that countered the presidents fraud claims.[/QUOTE]And what good would it have been for those officials to say otherwise? We did not have depositions Tooms, and you make it seem like "Trump officials" have this secret knowledge that others do not. We saw the boxes pulled out in Fulton County, and Republicans observers kicked out. We know now that the votes in Fulton County were not properly certified. Did the "Trump officials" do that work and say they were wrong? Hell no! It was not the NYT or CNN; it was a citizen journalist. He knows more than all the "Trump officials".
We saw Dems hanging up cardboard in heavily Democratic Wayne County, Michigan so no one could see what they were doing. And "Trump officials" said there was no cheating. How would they know?
Why is it that you need an ID in California to buy a beer but not to vote? The bullshit excuses you people come up with this when you are cheating is unreal. Oh, that is racist. How is racist to ask for an ID to vote but not racist when you are buying a beer?
The reason you do not need an ID in California to vote is so you Dems can cheat, and the reason there are no voter ID laws in California is you Dems are too chicken shit to think you can win if they were put into place.
You want to prove me things are fair? Change the fucking law and until then quit making excuses.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047284]You said it dude, once a fool, always a fool! You should know. BTW, is this your way of telling me, like thousands of other Repubs, you have voter buyer's remorse?[/QUOTE]No, this is me telling you that you are an arrogant ass. I understand Dems who vote the way they do because it is in their best interest, but you have no clue as to why people vote Republican. What you keep repeating is that MAGA people are stupid when the truth is you are a narrow minded, egotistical blockhead. And if you are voting Democrat as a form of identity versus how Democrats are actually performing for you, your mindset is a danger to Democracy.
You and Tooms go on and on about how terrible the economy is. But do you talk to people who actually live here? And if you did and those people said they are doing great under Trump or in my case that I have not noticed much difference between Trump and Biden, how would you respond? The appropriate response is to balance what is in the news with what you are hearing personally. But what you and Tooms do is insult the people living here if they do not agree with you. If you are doing better under Trump, you must be stupid. Everyone is doing worse!
Now I am sure there are people and businesses who have been hurt by tariffs, but the tsunami of predicted inflation has not shown up in my life or in the government's own number. Thing is that you ignore the ones doing better because of tariffs. In fact, if you are a typical Dem, it is impossible that anyone could be doing better because of tariffs when that is just not true.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047284]Nice strongman argument, but this particular debate is about Europe competing on data centers, not producing cars.[/QUOTE]LOL. No, it is the same reason. If a nation is not the low cost producer of an item, the government playbook is always the same. You give taxpayer subsidies to the industries you want in your country. You claim the products of the nation who can produce a good more cheaply are not safe. "We can't be dependent on American only data centers. We need our own!" and you put taxes on the goods from that other country, and you know what those taxes are called? They are called tariffs.
So, no, Europe cannot compete with the USA on a level playing field with data centers, so Europe titled the field. Your shining example of European success and green energy would go tits up without government assistance.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047284]But you are right, it really does take a special kind of fool, to vote for your MAGA Fuhrer...twice (2x) after a failed insurrection, 2 x impeached, 4 x indicted, loser of $83 million sexual defamation case and found guilty of 34 criminal felony counts of falsifying business records.[/QUOTE]And here we go again. You are married to all this identity politics bullshit versus performance. You took my tax dollars and went down that impeachment bullshit route to win versus performing? The problem with you dumb Dems is you want Congress and not the people to decide who should be president? FU! You are a traitor to Democracy. You want me to vote based on what some fucking New York judge or jury thinks versus my own self interests? Why would I do that especially when you dumb Dems make a habit of threatening judges? Judges are sages when they rule against Trump or say an election was not rigged, but if they say there is no right to an abortion? You Dems lose your shit.
You Dems elected a guy with obvious dementia, and after lying about him for years, you ditched him when the truth got out. Then God knows who picked the drunk and dumb as fuck Kamala and she picked a Veep in Tampon Timmy whose best quality for Kamala was that he was the rare person who looked more stupid than her. James Carville said she was a seventh stringer but not you.
In the last election, I intimately knew one of the judges locally and she is a Democrat, and I voted for her. I cannot imagine anyone could be more qualified to be a judge than her.
But is she were Republican, you would not vote for her. That you would vote for an incompetent Dem over a qualified Republicans makes you stupid, and you just did it in the last election.
Look at Hiliary compared to Kamala. I do not like her as a person, and I do not like her politics, but Hiliary is not a loser. She went to Yale and was successful as an attorney in private practice. Yeah, Bill helped her and made her career path easier but not for one fucking second do I think she needed him to make it. Kamala went to a shit law school, failed the bar, and the only reason she got into her position as the was sucking Willie Brown's dick. Kamala was a joke in the Democratic primaries. She got ahead (pun intended) because another white guy picked her based on her race and gender. And what has she done since losing the election outside of being drunk off her ass? And you fools keep going off on us for voting for Trump over her? That is laughable.
-
Electricity is the ultimate currency
The best power source for Data Centers is nuclear energy. Data Centers: they cannot be turned off.
[B]Bitcoin mining operations[/B] are the best for renewable energy. They can be located where powered is stranded. They can be turned off when demands of the grid are exceeded.
The beauty of electricity it is not political. It cannot be created by the will of politicians. It is a true currency. You only get electricity if you put in the work. Something that cannot be said for political actors.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047286][I][b]Duh!...Thats exactly what an LCOE is, when asked several times to present the lowest cost of energy![/b][/I]
Again for the uninitiated, if you don't understand, this is how analysts determine, across multiply energy sources, which is the lowest cost of energy.
[U]Definition of LCOE:[/U]
[LIST]The levelized cost of electricity/energy (LCOE), is a measure that calculates the average cost of electricity generation over the lifetime of a power plant, taking into account all costs associated with building and operating the plant divided by the total electricity produced. It is used to compare the cost-effectiveness of different energy generation technologies.[/LIST]
For weeks now, I'm been asking RamDavidson84, to provide FACTs and EVIDENCE, of an another energy generation source, that has lower or cheaper LCOE than solar, wind and / or solar or wind and batteries. And what do I get. Nothing but, [I][b]shuckin' and jivin' nonsense,[/b][/I] about "rubbing rocks" and wind turbines are a SCAM. Yeah, wind turbines that have, literally been around, generating energy, since the mid-19th century..[/QUOTE]No that's just your TDS refusing to read my posts. Have written pages and pages on why I and my entire state feels the way it does. And if you want stats so bad, just take 2 minutes and post a link yourself, but all the links that show stats still don't change my mind because as I have said a million, not having consistent power and the amount of area the farms accupy combined with maintenance costs and combine that with environmental damage and it makes no sense even if it is cheaper.
You really are a delusional little TDS man.
-
Uh! What now?
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3047275][URL]https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/germanys-weak-winds-trigger-record-surge-gas-fired-power-maguire-2024-12-04/[/URL]
Lets just hope those wind speeds pick up so the lights go on at night. Hahahahaha. I feel bad for all those ex-Nazi sons of bitchs they fell for that scam wind and solar shit. WW2 guilt did them in lololol.
Bro, Jersey shore summers are great. Go to the beach, fishing, boating, but best of all Velcro- Electricity is on 24 hours a day 365 days a year hahaha. So glad we have nuclear and didn't get dupped by AOC scum bag green new snake charm LOL. [/QUOTE][I]I give up...what's this post, supposed to mean?[/I]
-
Ford employee calls MAGA Fuhrer a 'pedophile protector'
The Epstein "pedophile protector" gets called out by righteous heckler.
[B]Suspended Michigan autoworker who heckled Trump gets outpouring of donations,[/B] Jan 13,2025, [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/14/trump-suspended-michigan-autoworker[/URL].
The Ford employee who was flipped-the-bird by the MAGA Fuhrer, after he heckled him said he has "no regrets" about calling the president out, as [I][b]a "pedophile protector".[/b][/I] But it seems Americans agreed with heckler, as tens of thousands of dollars were raised, to support the suspended worker.
-
5 photos
Uh-huh
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3047288][URL]https://amgreatness.com/2021/10/31/how-the-2020-election-was-rigged/[/URL][/QUOTE]And the reason those brilliant, perfectly co-ordinated, smoothly and effectively hidden Dem plans for stealing elections didn't work in 2024 when all it took to determine the presidential election winner was for Netanyahu to delay his agreed-upon ceasefire until after the election and thereby swing no more than 114,900 angry Muslim votes from the Dem to the Repub in the only 3 swing states that mattered is, what, again?
LOL. How funny is it that within the first year of this supposedly big "rejection" of Dems election, ChristoFascist MAGA Mike can only afford to lose one Repub vote in the House and still get his disastrous, American economy-destroying agenda done. I thought 2024 was an Angry Muslim Mandate Red Wave election.
-
3 photos
Trump's tariffs are doing exactly what he and Xi wanted them to do
Nobody has been better for the CCP and its economy than Donald Trump.
Nobody.
[B]China's trade ends 2025 with record $1.2 trillion surplus despite Trump tariff jolt.
Jan. 14, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-trade-ends-2025-with-record-trillion-dollar-surplus-despite-trump-tariffs-2026-01-14/[/URL]
[QUOTE]China posts record $1.189 trillion trade surplus in 2025
China's December dollar exports up 6.6% Y/Y, imports up 5.7%; beat forecasts
Strong exports come despite Trump's tariffs as China scales up new markets
China's ability to weather risks has been 'significantly enhanced', says official.[/QUOTE]Wait til you see how well Trump serves Putin's Russia Russia Russia and other dictatorships now that he will be very busy as Venezuela's new dictator and continues to initiate and wage new Wars Against America for the next 3 years. LOL.
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3047235]Greenland prime minister say they prefer Denmark than Trump. Nobody want Trump.[/QUOTE]So bad image for USA under Trump and his robbers. When can t trust such crazies, Europe send support in Greenland. Again, as always, such Trump bullshit about Iran. Old fat senile orange likes too much to make his daily show, he should try in Hollywood. So boring to hear him.
-
Ford
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047435]The Epstein "pedophile protector" gets called out by righteous heckler.
[B]Suspended Michigan autoworker who heckled Trump gets outpouring of donations,[/B] Jan 13,2025, [URL]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/14/trump-suspended-michigan-autoworker[/URL].
The Ford employee who was flipped-the-bird by the MAGA Fuhrer, after he heckled him said he has "no regrets" about calling the president out, as [I][b]a "pedophile protector".[/b][/I] But it seems Americans agreed with heckler, as tens of thousands of dollars were raised, to support the suspended worker.[/QUOTE]UAW feels the same way. What happened to all that free speech the MAGA fucktards love so much?
[B]Statement on Ford Plant Visit - Ford Department Director - UAW | United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America[/B]
[URL]https://uaw.org/statement-on-ford-plant-visit-from-vp-laura-dickerson-ford-department-director/[/URL]
-
I woke up again this morning
The best time for armageddon is when I'm asleep. That way I won't feel anything. Wake me up when World War 3 starts.
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3047568]The best time for armageddon is when I'm asleep. That way I won't feel anything. Wake me up when World War 3 starts.[/QUOTE]Rather than sleeping, you should train very hard to be ready to run to fight, as soon starting, maybe in Venezuela or Iran, to know what is war reality, smelling blood and death, hearing weapons. Not like in Hollywood movies.
-
Just thank God she isn't sitting next to this mental midget
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047385]No, this is me telling you that you are an arrogant ass. I understand Dems who vote the way they do because it is in their best interest, but you have no clue as to why people vote Republican. What you keep repeating is that MAGA people are stupid when the truth is you are a narrow minded, egotistical blockhead. And if you are voting Democrat as a form of identity versus how Democrats are actually performing for you, your mindset is a danger to Democracy.
You and Tooms go on and on about how terrible the economy is. But do you talk to people who actually live here? And if you did and those people said they are doing great under Trump or in my case that I have not noticed much difference between Trump and Biden, how would you respond? The appropriate response is to balance what is in the news with what you are hearing personally. But what you and Tooms do is insult the people living here if they do not agree with you. If you are doing better under Trump, you must be stupid. Everyone is doing worse!.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.reddit.com/r/UsaNewsLive/comments/1qcwrbu/ketanji_brown_jackson_fumbles_simple_legal_term/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.facebook.com/theconservativetribune/posts/ketanji-brown-jackson-humiliates-herself-again-frustrated-attorney-forced-to-tea/1314432664061727/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-calls-ketanji-brown-jackson-recipient-affirmative-action-who-unqualified[/URL]
[URL]https://www.theleadermaker.com/scotus-ketanji-jackson-its-about-my-feelings/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.heritage.org/press/heritage-president-judge-ketanji-brown-jackson-not-qualified-supreme-court[/URL]
-
3 photos
Uh
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047380]And what good would it have been for those officials to say otherwise? We did not have depositions Tooms, and you make it seem like "Trump officials" have this secret knowledge that others do not. We saw the boxes pulled out in Fulton County, and Republicans observers kicked out. We know now that the votes in Fulton County were not properly certified. Did the "Trump officials" do that work and say they were wrong? Hell no! It was not the NYT or CNN; it was a citizen journalist. He knows more than all the "Trump officials".
We saw Dems hanging up cardboard in heavily Democratic Wayne County, Michigan so no one could see what they were doing. And "Trump officials" said there was no cheating. How would they know?
Why is it that you need an ID in California to buy a beer but not to vote? The bullshit excuses you people come up with this when you are cheating is unreal. Oh, that is racist. How is racist to ask for an ID to vote but not racist when you are buying a beer?
The reason you do not need an ID in California to vote is so you Dems can cheat, and the reason there are no voter ID laws in California is you Dems are too chicken shit to think you can win if they were put into place.
You want to prove me things are fair? Change the fucking law and until then quit making excuses.[/QUOTE]And the guy Trump paid to look into everything for 3 solid years and found nothing?
[B]Voter data expert hired by Trump campaign says 2020 election was not stolen.
01/02/2024[/B]
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4385239-voter-data-expert-trump-campaign-2020-election-not-stolen/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Ken Block, whom the Trump campaign hired in 2020 to find voter fraud in the election, penned an op-ed Tuesday[b] stating unequivocally that the 2020 presidential election was not stolen and that there was no evidence of voter fraud sufficient to change the outcome of the election.[/b][/QUOTE]And Trump's own AG Bill Barr who looked into it, found nothing, called Trump a loon for obsessing over the nothing that is there and has had the same 5 years to read all the bullshit books, theories and fantasies you and all the judges who threw out the dozens and dozens of unsubstantiated claims have had to change his mind, but hasn't? See link in my earlier post.
Got anything for those?
-
1 photos
Couch-lover Vance has no idea what he is voting for. LOL
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3047591][URL]https://www.reddit.com/r/UsaNewsLive/comments/1qcwrbu/ketanji_brown_jackson_fumbles_simple_legal_term/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.facebook.com/theconservativetribune/posts/ketanji-brown-jackson-humiliates-herself-again-frustrated-attorney-forced-to-tea/1314432664061727/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.mediamatters.org/charlie-kirk/charlie-kirk-calls-ketanji-brown-jackson-recipient-affirmative-action-who-unqualified[/URL]
[URL]https://www.theleadermaker.com/scotus-ketanji-jackson-its-about-my-feelings/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.heritage.org/press/heritage-president-judge-ketanji-brown-jackson-not-qualified-supreme-court[/URL][/QUOTE]Casting the tie-breaking vote in the Senate as "President of the Senate" for an issue that was important enough to have actually garnered some otherwise Do Nothing, Know Nothing Repub votes, Trump's Vice President has no idea what he is voting for or which way he's supposed to vote, has to ask an aid to tell him what to do:
[URL]https://youtu.be/IuplKySL180?si=D9DHsb9FpIRFepqB[/URL]
BTW, what is it about these fat high-profile Repubs with beards that they have a sexual attraction for couches and other targets of their lust they really shouldn't target?
Meet a founding member of the Repub Freedom Caucus:
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047432][I]I give up...what's this post, supposed to mean?[/I][/QUOTE]No, don't give up now Velcro Spidy. We have been having so much fun since you decided to slander my very good friend who passed away and it is you who gave me this energy to constantly express my opinions with you.
Now, as for the post, it would be my grandest pleasure to explain in detail all it for you to ensure you have a deep level of understanding! Let's begin!
You posted an article about German wind farms, I was just once again pointing out to you one of the many flaws of wind power. It can't produce electricity when the wind doesn't blow while also explaining my opinion on why Germany even decided to build wind farms even though they are inferior to Nuclear. Germany feels guilt and shame for WW2, so everyone there has been too scared to speak up to the left's insanity and that's why they let the left run the country and create an energy crisis there.
The second part of the article is about how NJ is doing with its Nuclear energy and I was explaining to you why it is so great. Our beaches and summers here in NJ are priceless and we would pay double our electric bill to protect that and tell keep wind and solar farm snake charmers to FUCK OFF! Our beaches are way to important to the state than to cover with fucking wind mills that break and 6 months and you got to hire a crew of mountain climbers and million dollar a day cranes to fix. Yeah were good with out the solar and wind bull shit bro!
Then I was pointing out how Iran is about to fall because the protesters there are emboldened by the strength and savagery of the United States Military pulling off the great military achievement of this mother fucking century! Scooping Maduro without a single life lost. This mission will be remembered for hundreds of years and define Trump. If you click the link I posted, its an article about the sonic weapon the Special Forces used to explode the heads of their enemies and make them shit their Pants. Just like the most important man in Latin American history did, Hernan Cortez, when he brutally slaughtered an empire of millions with just a few hundred well armed and trained European Soldiers. Our special forces took on hundreds of soldiers and massively outnumbered but came out victorious in a very similar vain and I could be more proud to be American thinking about it. I just wanted to share that with you. And when Iran falls and Trump brings peace to those terrorists who don't even let their women show their face in public, once again it will be a sin if he isn't nominated for a Nobel fucking Peace Prize.
Green going to take the money too! Then we will all just enjoy the SPOILS OF THE OILS BABY! WHOOOOOOOOO! LOLOLOL.
Its a great day to be a republican lolololol.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3047622]Casting the tie-breaking vote in the Senate as "President of the Senate" for an issue that was important enough to have actually garnered some otherwise Do Nothing, Know Nothing Repub votes, Trump's Vice President has no idea what he is voting for or which way he's supposed to vote, has to ask an aid to tell him what to do:
[URL]https://youtu.be/IuplKySL180?si=D9DHsb9FpIRFepqB[/URL]
BTW, what is it about these fat high-profile Repubs with beards that they have a sexual attraction for couches and other targets of their lust they really shouldn't target?
Meet a founding member of the Repub Freedom Caucus:[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUp0Pr-sVcU[/URL]
-
Electrostate vs Petrostate: Lessons in Clean Energy Electrification
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047385]No, this is me telling you that you are an arrogant ass. I understand Dems who vote the way they do because it is in their best interest, but you have no clue as to why people vote Republican. ... And if you are voting Democrat as a form of identity ...
You and Tooms go on and on about how terrible the economy is. But do you talk to people who actually live here?.[/QUOTE]No not really, but good rant! But do get back to me and the debate, once you've figured out, what an LCOE is.
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3047625]You posted an article about German wind farms, I was just once again pointing out to you one of the many flaws of wind power.[/QUOTE]Same goes for you, once you've figured out what an LCOE is, and perhaps explain why, despite all the "downsides" of wind turbines (and solar), when in 2025, approximately [B]150 gigawatts (GW) of new wind capacity[/B] and around 380 GW of new solar capacity were installed worldwide, compared to ONLY a paltry 12 GW of nuclear worldwide, which was mostly in China? Explain, what exactly, makes this much clean energy [I](12x/30x wind/solar vs nuclear),[/I] a so called "Green SCAM", according to your MAGA ignorance?
[U]Electrification lessons from the illegal attack on Venezuela:[/U]
What you guys fail to realize, is that when right-wing dictators, tyrannical regimes (especially petrostate ones, like MAGA and your MAGA Fuhrer), invade other sovereign countries, on such pretexts as, [B]"narco terrorism"[/B] or [B]"weapons of mass destruction"[/B] or [B]"harboring terrorist groups"[/B] or [B]"national security",[/B] without first providing concrete evidentiary proof or the approval of congress or the people, it usually represents a clear signal, these petrostate regimes only wish to pillage, plunder and exploit, these sovereign nations for their natural assets and resources.
[U]The Weaponization of Venezuelan Oil and Gas:[/U]
So while the low hanging fruit of [I]"narco terrorism",[/I] and bogus claims and pretexts of [I]"oil being transported to terrorist organizations",[/I] will always appealed to a gullible MAGA base, when it was ALWAYS clear to the rest of America (and the world), this was the MAGA Fuhrer, weaponizing Venezuelan oil and gas, as a means to bring other sovereign nations, to heel, like China, that have an clear international right to trade with Venezuela, for their oil, whether the USA Likes it or not.
[U]The Electrification Message is Clear:[/U]
Thanks to the MAGA Fuhrer and his fake strongman bullying, in this part of the world, as he has now slapped name on and dubbed [I]"his hemisphere"[/I], if it wasn't already clear by now, to the rest of the Americas (Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Chile, Bolivia, Panama, Argentina), and to many other countries around the world, [I][b]"...START electrifying everything...NOW!"[/b][/I] and diversify away from the reliance of fossil fuels and petrostate influences.
-
China's ability to weather risks 'significantly enhanced', thank to guess who?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3047453]Nobody has been better for the CCP and its economy than Donald Trump.
Nobody.
[B]China's trade ends 2025 with record $1.2 trillion surplus despite Trump tariff jolt.
Jan. 14, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-trade-ends-2025-with-record-trillion-dollar-surplus-despite-trump-tariffs-2026-01-14/[/URL]
Wait til you see how well Trump serves Putin's Russia Russia Russia and other dictatorships now that he will be very busy as Venezuela's new dictator and continues to initiate and wage new Wars Against America for the next 3 years. LOL.[/QUOTE]What happened to the MAGA Fuhrer's economic policies, where "the other countries would be paying the tariffs"? LOL!
-
3 photos
Repub voters became a genuine loony fringe under Trump
Immediately after many of the 2020 Biden voters who decided to stay home and not bother to vote in 2024 because they were perfectly fine with their financial circumstances and had allowed themselves to be bamboozled by pro Repub pretend "bothsiders / neithersiders" into assuming it really doesn't matter all that much which Party is in the White House and that tiny handful of angry Muslims in the only 3 swing states that mattered foolishly switched their usual Dem vote to a Repub vote, the horrible realization set in that those disastrous decisions meant Donald Trump squeaked out a razor-thin win and would again produce the crap results he has been producing his entire life and most notably disastrous as a so-called president.
Consequently, Dem Party identification and Dem-leaning Independent affiliation has surged, as shown in this year-end Gallop Poll, many other polls and virtually every special or off-year election since January 20,2025:
[B]New High of 45% in U.S. Identify as Political Independents.
More independents lean Democratic than Republican, giving Democrats edge in party affiliation for first time since 2021.[/B]
[URL]https://news.gallup.com/poll/700499/new-high-identify-political-independents.aspx[/URL]
[QUOTE][b]Democratic-Leaning Independents Give Democrats Edge[/b]
Gallup has regularly asked political independents since 1991 whether they lean more toward the Republican or Democratic Party.
Last year, more political independents said they lean toward the Democratic Party than the Republican Party, with [b]the 45% of political independents breaking down into 20% Democratic leaners, 15% Republican leaners[/b] and 10% non-leaners. That is a shift from 2024, representing a three-point decline in Republican leaners and a three-point increase in Democratic leaners.[/QUOTE]Doing the math, it is inarguable that people who still identify with, support and vote for Repubs are the genuine loony fringe in America.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047666]No not really, but good rant! But do get back to me and the debate, once you've figured out, what an LCOE is.[/QUOTE]You already posted the definition. And you want a standing ovation because you realized that energy production costs money? LOL. What gets me is that you think this calculated cost is definitive versus what it really is, an estimate. You are trying to say that the LCOE of solar and wind is less than that of fossil fuels. As I have said before, that may be the case today in some places but it does not mean it will be tomorrow.
But you are new to the party. The oil companies used the same bullshit technique to say that ethanol production from corn in the USA was a net energy cost when an infrastructure buildup and money were being poured into it. The oil companies said ethanol from Brazil was cost effective but the American farmer could not make it without subsidies and tariffs. The irony is in in the mid 2010's Brazil had farming and drought issues with their sugar cane and ethanol production and the unthinkable happened. American farmers ended up exporting the supposedly cost ineffective ethanol to Brazil. Oops!
The reason ethanol was being talked about was the USA was we were running out of oil or more correctly oil that could be obtained profitably.
The Republican call for drill, baby, drill has led to horizontal drilling AKA fracking and in 20 years, USA oil production has gone from 5 million BPD to 13 million. In short, calling for doing that was 100% correct, and the USA has gone from being the world's largest importer of crude to being not just net self-sufficient but the world's largest producer.
And of course, the oil companies criticism of American ethanol production has totally stopped while production continues on. The only constant in the energy markets has been you Dems making fun of drill, baby, drill even when production has soared.
What is so funny is your use of LCOE is as definitive as your "scientist's" use of global warming. I looked at the complicated equation used for prediction and laughed at it. If there is just one variable off, the whole calculation goes to shit, and it turns out that one variable that was wrong was assuming sunlight was constant and predictable and it is not.
Of course, this was comedy gold for Republians. Global warming has nothing to do with the sun? Oh, yeah, we Dems had better change it to man made induced climate change. And how the fuck do you know climate change is man made? Was the climate constant before man was around? Wasn't there a volcano explosion causing global cooling for years or a meteor that changed the climate such that dinosaurs went extinct? So you "scientists" do not know. You are making estimates or educated guesses, and that is the same with your LCOE.
So here is your homework Spidy. Show me one of your so called experts who predicted the USA would nearly triple its oil production 20 years ago and then come back to make me with your busllhit projections. You Dems keep making the same mistakes again and again.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3047676]Immediately after many of the 2020 Biden voters who decided to stay home and not bother to vote in 2024 because they were perfectly fine with their financial circumstances and had allowed themselves to be bamboozled by pro Repub pretend "bothsiders / neithersiders" into assuming it really doesn't matter all that much which Party is in the White House and that tiny handful of angry Muslims in the only 3 swing states that mattered foolishly switched their usual Dem vote to a Repub vote, the horrible realization set in that those disastrous decisions meant Donald Trump squeaked out a razor-thin win and would again produce the crap results he has been producing his entire life and most notably disastrous as a so-called president.[/QUOTE]Did you have an orgasm after all that mental masturbation? You seem to be saying that these angry Muslims cost Harris the election. Somehow I do not think the Somali Minnesota muslims changed their vote.
The problem with your dumb rewrite is you blow things off that did matter to people. With 2020, your dumb comments about an election not being rigged blow off the literal conspiracy to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story. With 2024, you missed how grotesque the DOJ was weaponized to disqualify Trump. You blow off Biden lying his ass off when he said that he would not pardon Hunter Biden and go crazy when Trump pardoned that ex-president from Honduras.
Trump did not even offer up an excuse for the ex-president's pardon. It was, "I looked into his prosecution and it was bullshit. " Uh, okay. I heard those critical of Trump for doing this, but you all have been so critical about EVERYTHING with Trump, it is hard to listen to you all. I really could not defend Trump on this; I could only trust him. Was Trump messing around in Latin American politics which he had no business doing?
With Maduro, the answer was yes. Thing is Maduro was pure evil and I was in favor of getting him, but Trump got the crazy idea that he could be rigging elections and engaging in actions such that he could and should be choosing who heads up foreign nations. Trump is doing the same thing you Democrats have been doing. He and you have no respect for the will of the people. You Dems only agree with the people when they vote for you. Look at your fucked up primary process.
Because of the success with Maduro, Trump has lost it and is now talking about using the military in Greenland and Iran.
Trump would have my support if he stopped issuing permanent type visas to Somalia and a few countries similar to it given what happened but seventy five countries? What got me is what he did in Latin America. Colombia is bad but Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia are not? Brazil and Uruguay are bad but Argentina is fine?
Of course not. The obvious link is whether Trump likes the leaders of those countries or not. Sorry, Donny Boy, but the people and not you get to choose their leaders. You are doing what the Dems have done with their stupid impeachments and not respecting an elected leader.
So the trust with me at this point is gone. Donnie, what were you doing pardoning this ex-president? At this point, you have to prove to me that you did not issue a pardon for your own personal gain. Making this worse is that Trump just pardoned people whom were found guilty of crimes but that Trump personally liked.
For the mid terms, then Trump had better come to his senses if he wants me to vote Republican but I doubt that will happen. He seems more out of control every day. If the Dems come out with their same stupid DEI, men playing women's sports, anti-racist racism crap, I will sit on the side lines. If the Dems decide to get religion as Clinton did on not exessively spending money, going back to their principles on freedom of speech from the 1970's, and embracing MLK and juding others by the content of one's character and not the color of one's skin, that I will vote for them. However, I think that is as likely to happen as Trump coming to his senses.
For me, right now, it is not Republicans good, Dems bad. It is both parties are bad, and I have not felt this way since 2012. That year we had an election between a presidential hypocrite who bashed the rich while yucking it up with super rich CEOs and a Republican candidate who was one of those crony capitalist super rich CEOs.
-
Bad image MAGA
When Trump is really a too stupid robber, I think this is really time not to buy Trump products, versus his racketing. Same like I don t buy Chinese products, most being low quality or even dangerous, but also because I would feel not responsible about our planet, from their big pollution and lies, and also about human rights, when too many slaves and children. Sad world with shameful USA and China. I m proud Europe resist to Trump for Ukraine and Greenland which don t want him. Only criminal Netanyahou welcome him.
-
4 photos
Oh, that's nice but way too little and way too late
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047876]Did you have an orgasm after all that mental masturbation? You seem to be saying that these angry Muslims cost Harris the election. Somehow I do not think the Somali Minnesota muslims changed their vote.
The problem with your dumb rewrite is you blow things off that did matter to people. With 2020, your dumb comments about an election not being rigged blow off the literal conspiracy to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story. With 2024, you missed how grotesque the DOJ was weaponized to disqualify Trump. You blow off Biden lying his ass off when he said that he would not pardon Hunter Biden and go crazy when Trump pardoned that ex-president from Honduras.
Trump did not even offer up an excuse for the ex-president's pardon. It was, "I looked into his prosecution and it was bullshit. " Uh, okay. I heard those critical of Trump for doing this, but you all have been so critical about EVERYTHING with Trump, it is hard to listen to you all. I really could not defend Trump on this; I could only trust him. Was Trump messing around in Latin American politics which he had no business doing?
With Maduro, the answer was yes. Thing is Maduro was pure evil and I was in favor of getting him, but Trump got the crazy idea that he could be rigging elections and engaging in actions such that he could and should be choosing who heads up foreign nations. Trump is doing the same thing you Democrats have been doing. He and you have no respect for the will of the people. You Dems only agree with the people when they vote for you. .[/QUOTE]Your newfound pretend "bothsider / neithersiderism" will still help your beloved Trump and his MAGA Repub Cult in Congress fuck up America's economy and national security every day of every week of every month until a Dem House and possibly Senate Majority can stop him but even then only partially stop him a full horrible year from now.
Gee, thanks for your sudden awareness about the total shitstorm your 2024 Trump vote has and will continue to inflict on America and the American people.
But it is way too little and way too late for your sudden concern to do a damn bit of good for anybody or to keep you out of a well-deserved eternity of the tortures of hell after your demise.
Sorry. Take it up with God at the Pearly Gates. But I seriously doubt he will throw a pardon at you for what you have done.
-
Proud to be an American LOL!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3047670]What happened to the MAGA Fuhrer's economic policies, where "the other countries would be paying the tariffs"? LOL![/QUOTE]Trump just got the Nobel Peace Prize from a Venie hahahaha.
Guy is unstoppable. Ends wars before they begin and takes over whole nations without losing a soldier. Love him or hate him, he produces real results.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3047986]Your newfound pretend "bothsider / neithersiderism" will still help your beloved Trump and his MAGA Repub Cult in Congress fuck up America's economy and national security every day of every week of every month until a Dem House and possibly Senate Majority can stop him but even then only partially stop him a full horrible year from now.[/QUOTE]Yeah, sorry, I did not ask for your apology. When you Dems ignore voting, you are evil. That Trump is doing likewise makes him evil. That you cloak that in bothsiderism shows quite frankly how dumb you are. You have no principles. The Dems have not had a fair primary season where voters actually picked their candidate since Obama ran for a second term.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3047986]Gee, thanks for your sudden awareness about the total shitstorm your 2024 Trump vote has and will continue to inflict on America and the American people.[/QUOTE]Try again. He is copying what you all did. He has weaponized the IRS as you have done. He is handing out pardons like candy just like Biden did or whomever was signing said pardons. He is messing around in foreign countries. He has been looking to fight wars just like you all did with Ukraine. You think Ukraine was all Putin? How convenient for you that the world is so black and white.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3047986]But it is way too little and way too late for your sudden concern to do a damn bit of good for anybody or to keep you out of a well-deserved eternity of the tortures of hell after your demise.
Sorry. Take it up with God at the Pearly Gates. But I seriously doubt he will throw a pardon at you for what you have done.[/QUOTE]Sorry, dude, but I do not look the other way when evil is going on unlike you. Your excuse is to blame all evil on Republicans while you surround yourself with yes men who agree with you. We saw that with you all and Maduro. You cared more about Trump looking badly than the fate of 30 million people.
You must have missed the part where I said Dems bad, Republicans bad. That you took that to mean you are righteous shows just how full of it you are.
-
Give me a break
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3048002]Trump just got the Nobel Peace Prize from a Venie hahahaha.
Guy is unstoppable. Ends wars before they begin and takes over whole nations without losing a soldier. Love him or hate him, he produces real results.[/QUOTE]Trump just passed Vennie from one dictator to another. He hasn't taken over anything. If that were the case the oil companies would be going over there. They are scared shitless because there's no protection. There goes your assertion that USA has "taken over" a country. LOL.
-
1 photos
More unstoppable Trump's real results
Unstoppable Repub Trump is already on track in his 2nd term to surpass the real results he produced in his 1st term when for the first time since Repub Herbert Hoover he left office with fewer jobs in the economy than existed when he took office yet somehow managed to jack up the deficit my Trillions more than all the presidents before him and, amazingly, without laying a single brick or erecting a single support beam for infrastructure improvement anywhere in the country after 4 solid years of promising us his "Infrastructure Week" concepts of a plan were coming in "two weeks".
All of which results helped earn him the rank of Worst President in USA History by a group of non partisan historians.
Here are some of his unstoppable real results so far just in his first 2nd term year after inheriting the Envy of the World Economy from Dems Biden-Harris:
[B]Trumps tariffs trigger rising rate of job layoffs inside supply chain: ASCM/CNBC survey.
Jan. 12, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/12/trump-tariffs-jobs-layoffs-economy.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Rising costs associated with President Trumps tariffs have resulted in increased layoffs and less capital for investments, according to supply chain professionals surveyed by Association for Supply Chain Management and CNBC.
65% of survey respondents reported at least a 10%-15% increase in their supply chain costs, and business tell CNBC that even if the Supreme Court rules IEEPA tariffs illegal, refunds wont recover many costs they have incurred.[/QUOTE][B]Bankruptcies soared to a 15-year high in 2025 as companies struggled to cope with Trumps trade wars.
Among the firms that filed for bankruptcy this year were Spirit Airlines and solar company PosiGen.
Dec. 27, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/corporate-bankruptcies-increase-trump-trade-wars-b2890965.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]Corporate bankruptcies soared to a 15-year high in 2025 as companies struggled to cope with President Donald Trumps trade wars, among other factors, according to a new report.
No fewer than 717 companies filed for Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 bankruptcy between January and November, according to S&P data reviewed by The Washington Post. This marks a 14 percent increase from the same period in 2024 and the highest rate since 2010, when the country was recovering from the Great Recession.[/QUOTE][B]2025 was the worst year for hiring since 2020, December jobs report shows.
The U.S. added 50,000 jobs last month, a mixed report capping off a difficult year for the labor market.
Jan. 9, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/december-jobs-report-unemployment-rate-rcna253115[/URL]
[QUOTE]Just 584,000 jobs were created in 2025, far below the more than 2 million added in each of the prior two years, and the more than 4 million hires in 2022, the height of the post-pandemic recovery.
Last year, the labor market added jobs at an average pace of 48,000 jobs per month, after revisions.
..........
President Donald Trumps administration has also pursued aggressive immigration restrictions, and as a result many companies have taken a cautious approach to hiring noncitizens
Economists have said that rising immigration in recent years helped to address persistent U.S. labor shortages and bolstered the jobs market as a whole.[/QUOTE]Of course, as always, the "worst since a previous historic Repub policy and stewardship economic disaster" comparison fully applies.
-
Trump just abandoned US allies who defeated ISIS terrorists
Trump just abandoned US allies who defeated ISIS terrorists in Syria, namely the SDF who consist of secular Kurds, Arabs and other ethnicities. Leaving them to the mercy of former Al Qaeda leader a terrorist group who was the planner and committer of 9-11 attacks on world trade center.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3048055]Unstoppable Repub Trump is already on track in his 2nd term to surpass the real results he produced in his 1st term when for the first time since Repub Herbert Hoover he left office with fewer jobs in the economy than existed when he took office yet somehow managed to jack up the deficit my Trillions more than all the presidents before him and, amazingly, without laying a single brick or erecting a single support beam for infrastructure improvement anywhere in the country after 4 solid years of promising us his "Infrastructure Week" concepts of a plan were coming in "two weeks".
All of which results helped earn him the rank of Worst President in USA History by a group of non partisan historians.
Here are some of his unstoppable real results so far just in his first 2nd term year after inheriting the Envy of the World Economy from Dems Biden-Harris:
[B]Trumps tariffs trigger rising rate of job layoffs inside supply chain: ASCM/CNBC survey.
Jan. 12, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/12/trump-tariffs-jobs-layoffs-economy.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[B]Bankruptcies soared to a 15-year high in 2025 as companies struggled to cope with Trumps trade wars.
Among the firms that filed for bankruptcy this year were Spirit Airlines and solar company PosiGen.
Dec. 27, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/corporate-bankruptcies-increase-trump-trade-wars-b2890965.html[/URL]
[B]2025 was the worst year for hiring since 2020, December jobs report shows.
The U.S. added 50,000 jobs last month, a mixed report capping off a difficult year for the labor market.
Jan. 9, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/december-jobs-report-unemployment-rate-rcna253115[/URL]
Of course, as always, the "worst since a previous historic Repub policy and stewardship economic disaster" comparison fully applies.[/QUOTE]Trump doesn't care about all this, the olligarch who are support him doesn't care about it neither. More poor people is an excellent thing for the richest and more powerfull people.
-
Can haz world war three?
When is it the end of the world already? Jeez! I'm waiting for world war 3. Hello? Let's blow this popsicle stand! Humanity sucks and not in the good way.
*sigh* I just want to watch the world burn, is that too much to ask?
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Nuclear advance lessons from China's ACP100 SMR
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;3047405]The best power source for Data Centers is nuclear energy. Data Centers: they cannot be turned off.
[B]Bitcoin mining operations[/B] are the best for renewable energy. They can be located where powered is stranded. They can be turned off when demands of the grid are exceeded.
[b]The beauty of electricity it is not political.[/b] It cannot be created by the will of politicians. It is a true currency. You only get electricity if you put in the work. Something that cannot be said for political actors.[/QUOTE]I would also add, that the other beauty of electricity, is that there is [B]an abundance[/B] of it, that can be created and harvested "freely" anywhere in the world.
So while the lame-duck MAGA Fuhrer and it's zombie admin 2. 0, hamstrings America, with its dumbass "drill-baby-drill" policies and its Epstein Pedo Sex File distractions, China's ACP100 SMR, is quietly redefining and perfecting small nuclear reactor technology.
And although, there is still some finalization work to be done, on the commercial viability of the ACP100, the good news is, China's ACP100 SMR, has just completed and passed its non-nuclear turbine test run. China's ACP100 is not the world's first SMR, but it is the first of its kind and the front-runner, in a new class of smaller, safer, [B]factory-built reactors[/B] could reach practical and commercially viability.
[B]Chinese SMR completes non-nuclear steam start up test,[/B] Thursday, 8 January 2026, [URL]https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/chinese-smr-completes-non-nuclear-steam-start-up-test[/URL].
If proven viable with a true "modular" style build, from factory to plant site, with a significant decrease in construction time and "Lego-like" assembly and scalability, of about 2-3 years or less, it could be prove to be a game changer, towards a more electrostate world.
-
[QUOTE=Mskofmsk;3048103]Trump just abandoned US allies who defeated ISIS terrorists in Syria, namely the SDF who consist of secular Kurds, Arabs and other ethnicities. Leaving them to the mercy of former Al Qaeda leader a terrorist group who was the planner and committer of 9-11 attacks on world trade center.[/QUOTE]Well, Trump has his Trump Towers in Istanbul so Kelbdogan and his Al Qaeda friends in Syria are allowed to do anything they want.
If the SDF wants to get treated fairly by the current administration in the White House they better get two, or more, Trump Towers just as turkey.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3048055]Unstoppable Repub Trump is already on track in his 2nd term to surpass the real results he produced in his 1st term when for the first time since Repub Herbert Hoover he left office with fewer jobs in the economy than existed when he took office yet somehow managed to jack up the deficit my Trillions more than all the presidents before him and, amazingly, without laying a single brick or erecting a single support beam for infrastructure improvement anywhere in the country after 4 solid years of promising us his "Infrastructure Week" concepts of a plan were coming in "two weeks".
All of which results helped earn him the rank of Worst President in USA History by a group of non partisan historians.
Here are some of his unstoppable real results so far just in his first 2nd term year after inheriting the Envy of the World Economy from Dems Biden-Harris:.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2026/01/19/nolte-gop-probes-how-democrats-use-illegals-and-refugees-to-rig-elections/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3048002]Trump just got the Nobel Peace Prize from a Venie hahahaha.
Guy is unstoppable. Ends wars before they begin and takes over whole nations without losing a soldier. Love him or hate him, he produces real results.[/QUOTE]No award from Nobel for him, when his business is mostly bullshiting and robbering. Despite DT sucking so much Putin to make business with him, still war in Ukraine fortunately supported by Europe. Netanyahou still killing in Gaza, when supported by Trump. Far from peace. In Europe, versus crazy dangerous senile Trump, we have 13000 billions USD values, like we should take Russia values, best way to stop war.
-
[QUOTE=Mskofmsk;3048103]Trump just abandoned US allies who defeated ISIS terrorists in Syria, namely the SDF who consist of secular Kurds, Arabs and other ethnicities. Leaving them to the mercy of former Al Qaeda leader a terrorist group who was the planner and committer of 9-11 attacks on world trade center.[/QUOTE]CIA instructed who fucked world trade center. This is USA with huge holes about safety.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: An 'All-of-the-Above' Dems energy strategy was working
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047869]You already posted the definition. And you want a standing ovation because you realized that energy production costs money? LOL. What gets me is that you think this calculated cost is definitive versus what it really is, an estimate.[/QUOTE]Okay, Doc Einstein, since it sounds like "you know better" than everyone else, I'd love to hear what is it, you think industry analysts should use?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047869]You are trying to say that the LCOE of solar and wind is less than that of fossil fuels.[/QUOTE]I'll let the analytical data, facts and trends on LCOE speak for themselves. But perhaps you should open your eyes, read and do some homework for a change, instead of listen to every crap about renewables that comes out of your MAGA Fuhrer's mouth, or co-signing dumbass postings about renewables being a SCAM!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047869]As I have said before, that may be the case today in some places but it does not mean it will be tomorrow.[/QUOTE]Duh! Is this Carnac the Magnificent, trying to tell me he's got some magical way of figuring out LCOE into the future? Rather then using LCOE of today?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047869]The reason ethanol ... [/QUOTE]I think you missed the point of your own story? That being, while the "shale revolution" was a tremendous and timely "PIVOT", made by President Bush, to bolster [I] U.S. Energy security,[/I] in the 2000's has served America very well, it's diminishing role in an electrified era, won't.
But don't forget, that same energy program, thrived and excelled under President Obama's [I][b]"All-of-the-Above" energy strategy,[/b][/I] that sought to develop every available source of American energy, realizing that 2 percent of the world's oil reserves, isn't enough oil and [I]nat.gas was more of a "bridge fuel"[/I] towards a cleaner energy future.
This [I]"All-of-the-Above",[/I] energy strategy, was echoed under President Biden, in the IRA Bill, as (inexplicably IMHO) the oil and gas industry, also got billions for bogus CSS and DAC programs. This again was the [U][i][b]Dems supporting all forms of cleaner energy.[/b][/i][/U].
[U]U.S. Energy Security Under the MAGA Fuhrer:[/U]
Then [NOPARSE]we come to the U.S. energy security under your MAGA Fuhrer regime and he totally blindsides and hamstrings American future energy security interests, by blowing up and cancelling any clean energy tech, previously gained by Presidents Obama and Biden, only promoting dirty fossil fuels.
These backwards looking, antithetical, neanderthal, fossil fuel MAGA energy policies, WILL NOT serve America [/NOPARSE]well, [B]in a future that,[/B] for most people (who aren't half-wits) would agree, [B]is mostly electric[/B].
[U]Will China now capture and dominate the SMR market?:[/U]
So, in case you missed it, in my recent post, "Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Nuclear advance lessons from China's ACP100 SMR", China is poised and on the verge of true "modular" and "scalable" SMR builds. Meanwhile your Fuhrer, continues to pick your pockets and hamstrings American clean energy innovation with fossil fuel "drill-baby-drill" only polices.
-
That is the only reason the GOP exists.
[QUOTE=BennieBen;3048119]Trump doesn't care about all this, the olligarch who are support him doesn't care about it neither. [B]More poor people is an excellent thing for the richest and more powerfull people.[/b][/QUOTE]The part highlighted by me has been the entire economic philosophy, agenda and, no wild coincidence or witch's curse, the result of every elected Repub's economic policies and stewardship since the inception of the Republican Party.
Now they have Trump's Tariffs and Trade War economic policies delighting and pleasing Xi while his foreign policies of weakening and destroying NATO, making enemies of our allies, are delighting and pleasing Putin.
In Repub- / MAGA- / Trump-World, that is a major Win-Win. Of course, they love him for it.
-
Are you crazy
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3048295]CIA instructed who fucked world trade center. This is USA with huge holes about safety.[/QUOTE][URL]https://youtu.be/JpHmuVZ-Pdg?si=r0BjTGJRMaJ6Tb7x[/URL]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/china-cant-make-consumers-buy-goods-so-it-leans-services-drive-economy-2026-01-20/[/URL]
Even they don't want to the toxic trash they make.
-
2 photos
GOP put the pieces together and now they're launching an investigation, are they?
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3048215][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2026/01/19/nolte-gop-probes-how-democrats-use-illegals-and-refugees-to-rig-elections/[/URL][/QUOTE]Well, maybe the Repub House and Senate Majority can get something else really stupid done in light of their failure to get anything positive for America done.
So they think they have found something that 60+ Team Trump prosecutors facing 60+ GOP and Dem judges couldn't find and got laughed out of court about, desperate Repub Trump-enabler AG Bill Barr couldn't find, the guy Trump paid dumb Repub hillbilly sucker money to for 3 years to find but couldn't find.
Question: how does the fact that Obama and Biden each deported many more illegal aliens per year than Trump ever did, genuine criminals and not just nail salon technicians, gardeners and busboys, fit in with that big piece of the Repub puzzle where Dems enlist illegal aliens to conspire with them in a criminal enterprise?
Among other huge holes in the Repubs' presumed but never evident logic.
Inquiring minds want to know.
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTn-E4bDazw/?igsh=dTdpempuZ3BkZzF5[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3048238]No award from Nobel for him, when his business is mostly bullshiting and robbering. Despite DT sucking so much Putin to make business with him, still war in Ukraine fortunately supported by Europe. Netanyahou still killing in Gaza, when supported by Trump. Far from peace. In Europe, versus crazy dangerous senile Trump, we have 13000 billions USD values, like we should take Russia values, best way to stop war.[/QUOTE]Just a senile in full delirium, megaloman old ugly guy who think he is king of the world, but failing for USA economics, jobs and of course to stop wars, but trying hard robbering Ukraine, Greenland, Venezuela.
-
[QUOTE=FFlintstone69;3048350][URL]https://youtu.be/JpHmuVZ-Pdg?si=r0BjTGJRMaJ6Tb7x[/URL]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/china-cant-make-consumers-buy-goods-so-it-leans-services-drive-economy-2026-01-20/[/URL]
Even they don't want to the toxic trash they make.[/QUOTE]Didn't CIA instruct Bin Laden before he fucked USA.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3048311]Okay, Doc Einstein, since it sounds like "you know better" than everyone else, I'd love to hear what is it, you think industry analysts should use?
I'll let the analytical data, facts and trends on LCOE speak for themselves. But perhaps you should open your eyes, read and do some homework for a change, instead of listen to every crap about renewables that comes out of your MAGA Fuhrer's mouth, or co-signing dumbass postings about renewables being a SCAM!
Duh! Is this Carnac the Magnificent, trying to tell me he's got some magical way of figuring out LCOE into the future? Rather then using LCOE of today?
I think you missed the point of your own story? That being, while the "shale revolution" was a tremendous and timely "PIVOT", made by President Bush, to bolster [I] U.S. Energy security,[/I] in the 2000's has served America very well, it's diminishing role in an electrified era, won't..[/QUOTE]This is a typical stupid binary Spidy post. You take a complicated subject and boil it down to good and bad. China? Good. Obama, Bush, Biden? Good. Trump? Bad. Oil companies? Bad. I know what LCOE is, and you don't. Oh, LCOE is an estimate? Well, Mr. Smarty Pants, what would you use?
If you know what the energy markets are going to do, there is a futures market and you can plop down all your cash and if you are right, you can make a killing. How about you do that? Oh, yeah, sorry, you are a dumb Dem. You want to take other people's money and do that and not your own.
I love how you Dems are so smart and cocky with your green energy is good crap, and you neglect to mention that the people who bought into that narrative like Europe did are paying twice as much for electricity as the USA that did not.
And you Dems bash the rich when you are the ones sucking the population dry of money. Blue states pay through the nose for energy in comparison to most red states. Gasoline is like $2 more a gallon in California than neighboring states.
And Trump is destroying our future with drill, baby, drill? LOL. Here are two questions that you won't answer. Was there more drilling under Biden or Trump? Did the oil and gas companies make more money under Biden or Trump? Yeah, thank God, you command the facts so well.
And another post about China? You must have to type one handed seeing as you are stroking Xi's dick with your other hand. China built a small modular nuclear reactor. Wow! You neglect to mention that Russia has built one years earlier and the underlying technology was developed in the USA. But if you posted the whole truth, that does not fit your binary narrative of China good, Russia and the USA bad.
Nothing would make me happier than you dumb Dems being forced to live in China, breathe their air, and have you all swim in their rivers and lakes. That you pick the most polluted country on earth to use as a role model for your green utopia literally is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard in my life.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3048055]Unstoppable Repub Trump is already on track in his 2nd term to surpass the real results he produced in his 1st term when for the first time since Repub Herbert Hoover he left office with fewer jobs in the economy than existed when he took office[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/initial-jobles-claims-plunge-back-near-record-56-year-lows[/URL]
It is amazing that someone in Thailand is telling us about how bad the job market is. This 56 year low does not meet the economy is great. It means it is not bad and that people are staying at their same jobs. Where do you get this crap about jobs being destroyed?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3048055]Trumps tariffs trigger rising rate of job layoffs inside supply chain: ASCM/CNBC survey.[/QUOTE]Of course, it has to be a poll. I love how you Dems thinks estimates are facts and surveys and polls have astounding accuracy. You would think after the last three elections you dumb Dems would have learned how inaccurate your polls are, but no, you keep at it.
And after you Dems started burning up Elon Musk's car dealerships, you do not get to complain about deficits. That guy tried to lower deficits and worked to do so for the taxpayer for free, and all you Dems did was trash and threaten him.
There are a lot of good things coming out of the Trump cabinet domestically. The problem is Trump shooting off his mouth about international affairs distracts from that.
-
2 photos
Uh
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3048413][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/initial-jobles-claims-plunge-back-near-record-56-year-lows[/URL]
It is amazing that someone in Thailand is telling us about how bad the job market is. This 56 year low does not meet the economy is great. It means it is not bad and that people are staying at their same jobs. [B]Where do you get this crap about jobs being destroyed?[/b]
Of course, it has to be a poll. I love how you Dems thinks estimates are facts and surveys and polls have astounding accuracy. You would think after the last three elections you dumb Dems would have learned how inaccurate your polls are, but no, you keep at it.
And after you Dems started burning up Elon Musk's car dealerships, you do not get to complain about deficits. That guy tried to lower deficits and worked to do so for the taxpayer for free, and all you Dems did was trash and threaten him..[/QUOTE]Posted already. But I'll post it again, no problem:
[B]Layoff announcements top 1.1 million this year, the most since 2020 pandemic, Challenger says.
Dec. 4, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/04/layoff-announcements-this-year-top-1point1-million-the-most-since-2020-when-pandemic-hit-challenger-says.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Challenger, Gray & Christmas said layoff plans totaled 71,321 in November, a step down from the massive cuts announced in October but still enough to bring the 2025 total up to 1.17 million.
The most-cited reason for the month was restructuring, followed by closings and market or economic conditions.
Announced job cuts from U.S. employers moved further ahead of 1 million for the year in November as corporate restructuring, artificial intelligence and [b]tariffs[/b] have helped pare job rolls, consulting firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas reported Thursday.
The firm said layoff plans totaled 71,321 in November, a step down from the massive cuts announced in October but still enough to bring the 2025 total up to 1.17 million. [B]That total is 54% higher than the same 11-month period a year ago and the highest level since 2020, when the Covid pandemic rocked the global economy.[/b][/QUOTE]And that was only through November of 2025.
Oh, and here's more:
[B]US factory headcount falling despite Trump's promised manufacturing boom.
Jan. 10, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-factory-headcount-falling-despite-trumps-promised-manufacturing-boom-2026-01-09/[/URL]
[QUOTE]U.S. manufacturing jobs [b]continue to decline.[/b]
Unemployment rate falls slightly, but job creation estimates revised lower
Black unemployment rate rises, [b]manufacturing sector loses 70,000 jobs since April.[/b]
WASHINGTON, Jan 9 (Reuters) - U.S. manufacturing jobs in December [b]continued an eight-month skid that began last spring after President Donald Trump rolled out aggressive import taxes that he pledged would lead to a resurgence of blue-collar jobs by reshuffling world trade to favor U.S. workers.[/b]
The reshuffling has certainly occurred, with the U.S. collecting around $30 billion a month in tariff revenue, spread among U.S. consumers, importers, and overseas exporting firms, and as firms first frontloaded goods abroad to stock their shelves with tariff-skirting inventory, then slowed their purchases and brought down U.S. import levels.[/QUOTE]
-
Today in Davos. Ch, not Taylor Swift nor Bruce Springsteen, but 90 mn show of the ridiculous old senile schizophrene, master of bullshits, claiming fake in front of the world. We have to resist and get rid of this too old crazy dangerous. He should buy ice cream, rather than Greenland.
-
1 photos
He thinks it's Iceland
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3048463]Today in Davos. Ch, not Taylor Swift nor Bruce Springsteen, but 90 mn show of the ridiculous old senile schizophrene, master of bullshits, claiming fake in front of the world. We have to resist and get rid of this too old crazy dangerous. He should buy ice cream, rather than Greenland.[/QUOTE]He stood on the world stage and with a tone of grave authority revealed he doesn't know the difference between Greenland, his decades long obsession, and Iceland. He referred to Greenland as Iceland at least 3 times.
Which certainly must lend credence in some dumb Repub hillbillies' minds that he knows what the fuck he is blathering about when he talks about Biden not knowing he was alive and that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen from him. Lolol.
No other country can ever have trust or respect for The United States of America again. Not on a trade deal, not on a peace deal, not on anything. Not even the ones Trump / MAGA would deem "shithole" countries. Even they will now be more trusted and respected than the USA will be post-Trump.
The entire world now knows that the USA is, at most and best, 2-4 years away from 49% of the American electorate installing either a president, a majority in Congress or both with an [B]R[/B] next to their names who will know nothing and do nothing except enact the absolute worst policies for itself and anyone else who is stupid enough to try to ally with it.
Sad days for America. Sad days for the world.
Oh well. We tried.
-
I think we're almost there
I can feel it. In my bones. I consulted my tarot cards and did a coupla rounds with the spirits on my ouija board. We're almost there folks. World war 3 is almost upon us. Get ready. Yeah baby, let's watch the world burn!
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3048595]I can feel it. In my bones. I consulted my tarot cards and did a coupla rounds with the spirits on my ouija board. We're almost there folks. World war 3 is almost upon us. Get ready. Yeah baby, let's watch the world burn![/QUOTE]Trump is playing the chaos strategy, so yes it can go very wrong and start somehing he cannot control and stop. There is a thing who cannot be estimated and managed and its the pride of a nation. Its something you can hurt without noticed it and someday it can hurt you in the face. No one seen ww1 and ww2 coming, there was a lost of assumption and theory but when it started it took years and even decades to stop.
-
It's not a strategy
[QUOTE=BennieBen;3048606]Trump is playing the chaos strategy, so yes it can go very wrong and start somehing he cannot control and stop. There is a thing who cannot be estimated and managed and its the pride of a nation. Its something you can hurt without noticed it and someday it can hurt you in the face. No one seen ww1 and ww2 coming, there was a lost of assumption and theory but when it started it took years and even decades to stop.[/QUOTE]It's early onset of dementia. Can you name any leader or any sane person who acts like he does?
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3048410]This is a typical stupid binary Spidy post. You take a complicated subject and boil it down to good and bad. China? Good. Obama, Bush, Biden? Good. Trump? Bad. Oil companies? Bad. I know what LCOE is, and you don't. Oh, LCOE is an estimate? Well, Mr. Smarty Pants, what would you use?[/QUOTE]Still don't know what an LCOE is? Here let me remind you once again!
[U]Definition of LCOE:[/U]
[LIST]The levelized cost of electricity/energy (LCOE), is a measure that calculates the average cost of electricity generation over the lifetime of a power plant, taking into account all costs associated with building and operating the plant divided by the total electricity produced. It is used to compare the cost-effectiveness of different energy generation technologies.[/LIST]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3048410]And Trump is destroying our future with drill, baby, drill? LOL. Here are two questions that you won't answer. Was there more drilling under Biden or Trump? Did the oil and gas companies make more money under Biden or Trump? Yeah, thank God, you command the facts so well.[/QUOTE]Still failing to grasp the meaning of your own argument from the "shale revolution" to "drill-baby-drill"? Here let me remind you once again!
[U]U.S. Energy Program from Bush to Trump:[/U]
The "shale revolution" was a tremendous and timely "PIVOT", made by President Bush, to bolster [I]U.S. energy security,[/I] [B]in the 2000's has served America very well,[/B] however its diminishing role in an electrified era, won't. The energy program, thrived and excelled under President Obama's "All-of-the-Above" energy strategy, and under President Biden's IRA bill, that sought to develop every available source of American energy, even CSS and DAC. This again was the [B]Dems supporting all forms/b of cleaner energy.[/B].
Then we come to the USA Energy security under your MAGA Fuhrer regime, that basically throws the USA Energy program for clean energy under the bus, and sets American on a path that places China well ahead in this new electrified era.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3048410]And another post about China? [/QUOTE][B]Trump Hurting US Auto Manufacturing While Helping China, Pete Buttigieg Says: TDS[/B], January 15,2026 [URL]https://www.thedrive.com/news/trump-hurting-us-auto-manufacturing-while-helping-china-pete-buttigieg-says-tds[/URL].
[B]China Wins as Trump Cedes Leadership of the Global Economy,[/B] January 22,2026 [URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/22/business/davos-trump-xi-china.html[/URL].
Your MAGA Fuhrer is doing more for China and Russia, than Xi and Putin (respectively), could have every hoped for.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Who's got range anxiety now?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3048410]And Trump is destroying our future with drill, baby, drill? LOL. Here are two questions that you won't answer. Was there more drilling under Biden or Trump? Did the oil and gas companies make more money under Biden or Trump? Yeah, thank God, you command the facts so well.[/QUOTE]It seems to me the [B]"Drill-Baby-Drill"[/B] and "endless fossil fuel growth" zealots, are not yet ready to fully make the "PIVOT", to an electrical era and it is exactly the same kind of hubris, legacy and western automotive manufacturers thought, thinking they could just slap a battery into a any current ICE chassis, and "presto magico" you'd have a EV. And look how that turned out, since the Chinese auto manufacturers began eating their lunch.
So if YOU, like your MAGA Fuhrer, don't think it's yet time to strategically "PIVOT" to electrification, then by all means, keep regaling us with past stories of the former glory of the USA Energy policies. After all it is the MAGA thing to do, right? Especially in the face of a know nothing, do nothing, no nothing zombie MAGA government.
[B]The Quiet Retreat: Why the oil and gas industry is implementing its own decline, even as the IEA resurrects an old growth scenario,[/B] 12 November 2025.
[LIST][i]"Political pressure may be forcing the IEA to revive an old forecast of endless fossil fuel growth, but oil and gas investment reality tells a clearer story of an industry embracing decline.
The recent threat by US Energy Secretary Chris Wright to defund the International Energy Agency (IEA) has achieved its goal: the return of the pro fossil-fuel Current Policies Scenario (CPS) to the agencys flagship reports. (WEO, Nov 12)
For critics of peak demand and the energy transition, this is seen as a victory for data over ideology. In reality, it is the reverse it is a triumph of political gesture over foresight.[/i]
[URL]https://carbontracker.org/the-quiet-retreat-why-the-oil-and-gas-industry-is-implementing-its-own-decline-even-as-the-iea-resurrects-an-old-growth-scenario/[/URL][/LIST]
What's even more funny, about those in denial, is how the decline in gas stations in places like Norway, Sweden, Nepal and China, is that, now [B]ICE owners, are the ones with "range anxiety", LOL[/B]!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3048647]It seems to me the "Drill-Baby-Drill"and "endless fossil fuel growth" zealots, are not yet ready to fully make the "PIVOT", to an electrical era and it is exactly the same kind of hubris, legacy and western automotive manufacturers thought, thinking they could just slap a battery into a any current ICE chassis, and "presto magico" you'd have a EV. And look how that turned out, since the Chinese auto manufacturers began eating their lunch.
So if YOU, like your MAGA Fuhrer, don't think it's yet time to strategically "PIVOT" to electrification, then by all means, keep regaling us with past stories of the former glory of the USA Energy policies. After all it is the MAGA thing to do, right?[/QUOTE]LOL. I ask you two questions and you go off on this mental masturbation rant versus just answering them. Fine, I will answer them. The rig count is used to measure driling activity, and it was far higher under Biden then Trump and because oil prices were higher under Biden, the oil companies made a lot more money under Biden.
Of course, I am speaking with a dumb Dem who thinks government policies and not market reality is what drives the energy market.
I remember watching a CNBC show and a commentator said, "I do not want to talk politics but regardless of your politics, Joe Biden is the best friend the oil companies have ever had. " and he was dead right.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3048645]Still don't know what an LCOE is? Here let me remind you once again!
Definition of LCOE:
The levelized cost of electricity/energy (LCOE), is a measure that calculates the average cost of electricity generation over the lifetime of a power plant, taking into account all costs associated with building and operating the plant divided by the total electricity produced. It is used to compare the cost-effectiveness of different energy generation technologies.[/QUOTE]Yawn! You still do not understand how energy companies think. I said that Trump made a mistake excluding other nations from developing Venezuelan oil reserves and predicted Exxon, the largest oil company, would balk at being involved in Venezuela, and they have done so. The reason is Exxon was hugely burned when investing in Venezuela and I did not think they were willing to invest there again because of how much they lost / had stolen from them. But there are other oil companies willing to go in.
And this is where your LCOE bullshit falls flat on its face. You can estimate the cost of labor, pipelines, and drilling equipment ETC into a LCOE, but there is no way in hell you can quantify the political risk. In fact, it is that risk why Exxon is staying out and Baker Huges is going in. Baker Hughes beileves Trump will protect their investment, and Exxon is not so sure.
And despite your nonstop diarrhea about politics and energy and your light bulb moment that costs actually factor into energy production, how does LCOE account for political risks / cost? Yeah, you will ignore that question too.
And just stop about Bush and shale or Obama and shale. Bush's solution to our declining oil production was war in Iraq. An oil employee came up with fracking or horizontal drilling and at the price of oil back then, it was finally made profitable to produce. The talk of the time back then was the bullshit concept of peak oil and how we were running out and had to go to war to get oil.
That Bush invaded Iraq was one of the dumbest moves in American foreign policy history. Of course, Biden and the Dems were just as equally bird brained. Instead of building a water and natural gas pipeline to the Western USA from Alaska and solving high energy costs and future droughts, Biden directed money towards Ukraine and building these dumb electrical charging stations in the middle of nowhere. Of course, at least with Ukraine, Biden saved the nation that was #1 for Democrats and their money laundering NGO schemes, so there is that plus for you guys. For the poor consumers and farmers on the West Coast, it was the ultimate middle finger.
-
It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine
I'm old enough to even remember the Cuban missile crisis, and at no point since then and now have I ever felt like we're closer to the end of the world than now. I couldn't be happier. I want to watch the world burn!
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3048633]It's early onset of dementia. Can you name any leader or any sane person who acts like he does?[/QUOTE]Yes, Trump who was re elected, so his behavior was well known and when he tried to fuck capitol and US constitution, is too old, rather senile and a danger when his few neurons have now big problem. Fortunately, Europe resist to his delirium, but I find worrying to see such dangerous in dementia. I wish he won t last for long.
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3048750]I'm old enough to even remember the Cuban missile crisis, and at no point since then and now have I ever felt like we're closer to the end of the world than now. I couldn't be happier. I want to watch the world burn![/QUOTE]If you want to die, easy with your free weapons killing so many and children every year.
-
Uh? Gish Gallop aside, what the hell?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3048732]LOL. I ask you two questions..[/QUOTE][NOPARSE]Uh...let me stop you right there, dude! WTF are you talking about? Please,...is it too much[/NOPARSE] ask, [B]that [u]YOU[/u] stay on topic?[/B].
[NOPARSE] Here's an idea...YOU TELL ME, what the fuck topic of this particular debate, is it, you think you're debating? And I'll let you know if you're even in the debate[/NOPARSE] ballpark!
-
What do you get when MAGA just 'shoots from the hip'? Hint: More MAGA Nonsense!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3048733]Yawn! You still do not understand how energy companies think. ...[/QUOTE][NOPARSE]Again...let me stop you right there, dude, as you again demonstrate you have no freakin' idea what LCOE [/NOPARSE]is!
The levelized cost of energy (LCOE), is [U]used to assess the financial viability of [b]NEW (or proposed)[/b] energy projects[/U] by comparing the average cost of electricity generation over the project's lifetime.
Note, the operative words being "NEW" or proposed energy projects, NOT ongoing or current projects in operation.
That's it, no more lessons on LCOE for you [B]....Do your homework[/B] and stop trying to shoot from the hip, like someone drunk on his on MAGA bullshit and nonsense!
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3048752]Yes, Trump who was re elected, so his behavior was well known and when he tried to fuck capitol and US constitution, is too old, rather senile and a danger when his few neurons have now big problem. Fortunately, Europe resist to his delirium, but I find worrying to see such dangerous in dementia. I wish he won t last for long.[/QUOTE]After a mother with 3 children, now a 5 yo child, USA fall really crazy under so dangerous and for citizens, Trump. Wake up.
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3048824]After a mother with 3 children, now a 5 yo child, USA fall really crazy under so dangerous and for citizens, Trump. Wake up.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5s9x030mpAc[/URL]
-
LCOE is irrelevant for oil. Well, yes, you could look at the cost of generating electricity from fuel oil or diesel. But who does that? Caribbean islands and people who can't rely on their local power grids? If you compare the cost for long haul trucking, marine vessels, planes and the like, the cost of the renewables will look sky high compared to gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. Making green hydrogen isn't cheap.
Another consideration lost in the LCOE debate is that solar and wind can't reliably supply base load electricity. Yes, with batteries, solar may be good for 4 to 6 hours after the sun stops shining. But what do you do for multi-day or seasonal weather events? Or in the early morning hours before the sun's up?
The best solution is to follow the example of Texas. Exploit oil, natural gas, nuclear, solar and wind. The worst is California, where government mandates force renewables down peoples' throats. The California consumer pays over 2 X what Texans pay for electricity.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmbZwxEnAFc[/URL]
-
Duh!
Well duh, last I checked, oil is still a form of energy and no one said it was irrelevant. But should it be used to generate electricity?
And BTW, oil isn't currently the lowest cost of energy, when looking to build new megawatt projects for the generation of electricity. But should it be considered [I]...sure why not[/I]?
I wonder why when analyzing a country's (or state's) electricity grid, we see it asked or given as an [B]"energy mix"[/B] or different sources of energy that make up their electricity grid. Meaning [NOPARSE]solutions for each country's (or state's) grid, will usually depend on a myriad of things (ie. costs/wealth, politics, resources, geography, land rights, right-of-way, culture, expertise...etc) as to why throughout their grid's history, it is what it is today.
That said, without a doubt, today's solar, wind and batteries are the some of the lowest forms of energy generation and capture. Today, renewables make up the largest portion of the grid (well over 50% and growing), for many countries, rather than that of fossil [/NOPARSE]fuels.
-
I find crazy senile Trump and his ICE killing anybody, behave in Minneapolis just like Iranian mollahs. USA became a really dangerous country, led by crazy Trump. I m happy not to be American. Fortunately, Europe resist to such crazy all the time bullshiting.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: LCOE for Educational Purposes ONLY!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3048732]LOL. I ask you two questions and you go off on this mental masturbation rant versus just answering them. Fine, I will answer them.[/QUOTE]LOL! Answers or more bullshit? BTW, I don't doubt for a second, that feeble and frustrated minds, like yours, will view LCOE, as ONE BIG masturbation rant, but that's out of my control and not my problem.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3048733]And this is where your LCOE bullshit falls flat on its face...[/QUOTE]Really? 'cause nothing thus far that you've said, quite says ignorance and illiteracy on the subject of LCOE, than you calling it [B]my "LCOE bullshit",[/B] when so many industries, like investment banks, financial advisors, project developers & investors, utility policymakers & planners, government agencies and energy analysts & consultants use LCOE everyday for critical planning and financial decision making.
[U]For Educational Purposes only![/U]
BTW, [NOPARSE]Elvis 2008, view my so called rants, as masturbation all you want to, if that's your thing...LOL! Far be it from me, to judge, what Elvis 2008 loves to view as masturbation ! That Said...
Know this, [/NOPARSE][B]before you continue to embarrass yourself...AGAIN,[/B] with regards to the subject matter of LCOE and understanding what a LCOE is and / or does, perhaps you should take a look at the following 2025 LinkedIn post, from Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF), on the Global Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE).
Scroll down to [U]see a BNEF LCOE benchmarks chart,[/U][NOPARSE] of the $ per megawatt hour from 2020 to 2025 on Nat.Gas, Coal, On/Offshore Wind, Fixed/Tracking Solar and Battery [/NOPARSE]Storage.
[B]BNEF - Future of Energy: Global Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE), benmarks 2020-2025,[/B] 06 February 2025, [URL]https://www.linkedin.com/posts/bloombergnef_renewables-wef26-bloomberghouse-activity-7420452042361458688-djFn[/URL] -OR- [URL]https://uk.linkedin.com/showcase/bloombergnef/?trk=public_post-text[/URL]
So hopefully you don't embarrass yourself to much, but if you prefer masturbating viewpoints, to my so called LCOE rants, then knock yourself out! Here is another report on LCOE for the UK's 28 DFIF countries.
[B]BNEF has examined levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) for major generation technologies across DFIDs 28 priority countries,[/B] 15 November 2015, [URL]https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a0897b40f0b652dd00023e/61646_Levelised-Cost-of-Electricity.pdf[/URL].
Please remember, that while I'm providing LCOE information, [U]it is purely for educational purposes ONLY![/U] I can't control how people choose to use [B](or view it as masturbation, of)[/B] the information!
-
Life is too damn long if you ask me. Anybody who's dead now are the lucky ones cause they don't have to experience the travesty that is day to day life *sigh*.
-
Stop the Election Fraud
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3048531]He stood on the world stage and with a tone of grave authority revealed he doesn't know the difference between Greenland, his decades long obsession, and Iceland. He referred to Greenland as Iceland at least 3 times.
Which certainly must lend credence in some dumb Repub hillbillies' minds that he knows what the fuck he is blathering about when he talks about Biden not knowing he was alive and that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen from him. Lolol.
No other country can ever have trust or respect for The United States of America again. Not on a trade deal, not on a peace deal, not on anything. Not even the ones Trump / MAGA would deem "shithole" countries. Even they will now be more trusted and respected than the USA will be post-Trump.
The entire world now knows that the USA is, at most and best, 2-4 years away from 49% of the American electorate installing either a president, a majority in Congress or both with an [B]R[/B] next to their names who will know nothing and do nothing except enact the absolute worst policies for itself and anyone else who is stupid enough to try to ally with it..[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/2026/01/equal-representation-should-mean-equal-representation-for-american-citizens/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3048805]Again...let me stop you right there, dude, as you again demonstrate you have no freakin' idea what LCOE is![/QUOTE]Man, you really do have outmeal for brains. You think I don't know about cost when it comes to opening a business? You make it sound like you have discovered the fountain of youth when you are talking about something I would blast a college freshman business major for not knowing. That you think that estimated cost is all that matters in a business tell me that you have never opened a business before.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3048805]That's it, no more lessons on LCOE for you ...Do your homework and stop trying to shoot from the hip, like someone drunk on his on MAGA bullshit and nonsense![/QUOTE]This kills me too. That you think who you vote for is a sign of intelligence shows me how much you are lacking it. Hey, dummy, you voted for the guy with actual dementia and stage 4 prostate cancer once, and the only reason you did not vote for him a second time is that he was not on the ballot. Even after the disasterous debate that Biden lost, you would have voted for him. And you wear your voting as a sign of intelligence?
And you think you are educating anyone when you say the same thing again and again? LOL. You have had three people give you example after example of when LCOE estimates are off and you are so fucking cocky that you think they are nowhere near as bright as you.
You don't think that stupid California train to nowhere did not have a cost report or business plan? What the hell happened? According to you, all that matters is you calculate cost and the money rolls in. All you have demonstrated is you do not know jack about business.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3049019]LOL! Answers or more bullshit? BTW, I don't doubt for a second, that feeble and frustrated minds, like yours, will view LCOE, as ONE BIG masturbation rant, but that's out of my control and not my problem.[/QUOTE]My questions involved your accusation of how damaging Trump was with his drill, baby, drill policy. I pointed out that drilling happened more under Biden than Trump and that oil comanies made more under Biden than Trump, and you go hide under you LCOE bullshit line like a child hides under a mother's skirt.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3049019]Really? 'cause nothing thus far that you've said, quite says ignorance and illiteracy on the subject of LCOE, than you calling it [B]my "LCOE bullshit",[/B] when so many industries, like investment banks, financial advisors, project developers & investors, utility policymakers & planners, government agencies and energy analysts & consultants use LCOE everyday for critical planning and financial decision making.[/QUOTE]Yeah, they use an estimate as it should be used. You make LCOE into a hardened fact that should dominate all policy decisions moving forward. Of course, like Tooms, you are dictating policy while living on a foreign beach. Your entire case that estimated costs LCOE are all that should matter with future energy production has fallen on its face once again.
In the real world, alternative energy has failed again when needed most, [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/post-winter-storm-deep-freeze-pushes-power-grids-brink-feds-move-avert-blackouts[/URL].
Golf clap for fossil fuels saving the grid from collapse. It wasn't solar or wind. It was oil and natural gas.
Meantime in New England and Boston oil. Yes OIL. Is a stunning 39% of electricity production.
Never, ever seen this high.
Next day power costs (on the left) are super high as well.
300 miles from one of the largest nat gas fields in the world and burning. Oil.
Weird.
It is funny how we fossil fuel loving red Republicans keep saving the asses of you blue state fools. As has been pointed out to you a million times, there are places solar and wind make sense and places that it does not, and New England is one place it does not. You have that huge natural gas field in Pennsylvania, and the obvious source of cheap electricity and New England and the libs who run it tried to go with solar and wind. LOL. That fell on its face with this winter storm and they had to go back to oil and wood. Unfuckingreal.
-
Why not me?
Why is everybody else getting 'iced' but I'm still alive free to walk around? I want a free trip to the morgue too. I'm old, I'm tired and my life is shit. And I don't have the guts to unlife myself yet, so how come other fuckers out there are the lucky ones? Its like those rich idiot Swiss young people setting themselves on fire in some weird night club instead of going to ski. Nothing makes sense anymore in this world of AI and no one believing anything and not trusting anyone.
Before you know it, somebody'll say it snowed like 2 feet yesterday. Yeah right. I call BS on that.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: The EU says, 'less gas more LCOE wind turbines, please'
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3049149]And you think you are educating anyone when you say the same thing again and again? LOL. You have had three people give you example after example of when LCOE estimates are off and you are so fucking cocky that you think they are nowhere near as bright as you.[/QUOTE]Despite the dumbass comments on wind turbines by the senile foul-mouth MAGA Fuhrer, at the WC Forum (and similar anti-wind turbine sentiments from ISG-MAGA acolytes), the EU (Britain, Germany, Denmark Norway, Netherlands and other European countries) [NOPARSE]announced they will be signing an agreement to jointly install 100GW of offshore wind turbines, and 20GW by the year 2030, in large scale joint projects.
This agreement will solidify and renews past commitments, to wean themselves off their reliance on Russian gas by 2028 and U.S. gas beyond [/NOPARSE]that. [B]The United Kingdom and Eight European Countries Partner to Build 100GW of Offshore Wind,[/B] January 26,2026. [URL]https://energynews.pro/en/the-united-kingdom-and-eight-european-countries-partner-to-build-100-gw-of-offshore-wind/[/URL]
[QUOTE]According to a separate report, indicates British consumers have enjoyed [b]savings of $1.9 billion (1.6 billion) from the nine existing undersea cables linking the UK to Europe since 2023.[/b][/QUOTE]That's a [I][b]pretty big commitment and billion dollar savings for intermittent power,[/b][/I] for [NOPARSE]100GW offshore wind turbines built and installed jointly, 20GW by 2030 and 300GW by 2050 [/NOPARSE][I]...hmmmm,[/I] I wonder if they checked if, [U]a LCOE "baseload"[/U] was even considered?
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3049291]Why is everybody else getting 'iced' but I'm still alive free to walk around? I want a free trip to the morgue too. I'm old, I'm tired and my life is shit. And I don't have the guts to unlife myself yet, so how come other fuckers out there are the lucky ones? Its like those rich idiot Swiss young people setting themselves on fire in some weird night club instead of going to ski. Nothing makes sense anymore in this world of AI and no one believing anything and not trusting anyone.
Before you know it, somebody'll say it snowed like 2 feet yesterday. Yeah right. I call BS on that.[/QUOTE]Wear a shirt with a trans flag on it, with a medical blue face mask, platform shoes with a skirt, hold a big cardboard with some lgbt slogan again ice and maga with some socilalist measure as suggestion written on it like 'Not MAGA, But LFSFT: Let Freespeech FUCK TRUMP! Save my medicare and my gendre transition plan!' and when they come to talk to you you speak to them in a foreign langage then you pull out you cellphone from your pocket very fast and begin to film them while continuing to talk loud in a foreign langage. You should meet your god soon after that.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Why does MAGA prefer to play the blame?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3049224]In the real world, alternative energy has failed again when needed most, [URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/post-winter-storm-deep-freeze-pushes-power-grids-brink-feds-move-avert-blackouts[/URL].
Golf clap for fossil fuels saving the grid from collapse. It wasn't solar or wind. It was oil and natural gas.
Meantime in New England and Boston oil. Yes OIL. Is a stunning 39% of electricity production. ...
You have that huge natural gas field in Pennsylvania, and the obvious source of cheap electricity and New England and the libs who run it tried to go with solar and wind. LOL. That fell on its face with this winter storm and they had to go back to oil and wood. Unfuckingreal.[/QUOTE]It's always so freakin' hilarious, how you and the fossil fuel fool that wrote the article, always somehow end up blaming renewables, wind and solar, for every electrical failure, one weather disaster after another. LOL! I'm still laughing at the Texas fools, that were blaming wind turbines, for they own ineptitude and lack of preparedness, in the 2021 winter storm. [URL]https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/19/politics/texas-energy-outage-wind-turbine-blame-green-energy-fact-check[/URL]
And what's even funnier, is that, neither you nor he, can do basic 5th grade math. Meaning, when fossil fuels supply the bulk or 60% of [I]U.S. National grid's power,[/I] how the freakin' hell can you squarely blame renewables (solar and wind), that only supply 15% the power to the electrical grid, with the short comings and failures of the recent winter storm?
Do the math and any half-witted 5th grade student, will tell you, if there is blame, that fossils fuels deserves most of the bulk, or majority of the blame. But as I suspect, most gullible MAGAs may have failed 5th grade math.
But dude, don't get it twisted! Unlike you, I won't blame fossil fuels, as the consensus is reporting that, the blame and failures, lay squarely on, downed, frozen and outted power lines and not having a more resilient, robust and balanced electrical grid system.
[B]Winter storm tests US electric grid as outages spread[/B], January 26,2025. [URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2026/01/25/winter-storm-electric-grid-overdrive-00745690?[/URL] [B]Winter Storms Are Straining the U.S. Electric Grid[/B] January 26,2025. [URL]https://nzero.com/blog/winter-storms-are-straining-the-u-s-electric-grid/[/URL]
But by all means, blame 15% solar and wind, if it makes you and your MAGA Fuhrer, feel better about the inept administration's handling of the winters storms and his cancellation of wind farms, that would provide additional clean power.
So MAGA, rather than playing the blame game, perhaps you should for once, try "administrating" and "governing", thereby, fixing the real problems with the [I]U.S.electrical grid?[/I]
-
Woke up again today
*sigh*, people who want to live, die. And people like me that want to die, still somehow continue to live. Jeezum crow.
Christ on a stick.
Well, I'm super old anyway, just a matter of time.
-
Great news!
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eitefl3Tq7s[/URL]
We're closer than ever to nuclear annihilation. But come on! From the cuban Missile Crisis to everything in between, how many times have we been close? I'll believe it when I feel the heat and I'm burnt to a crisp. Ha! I wish I was dead. Well, more like I was never born. *sigh* My life sucks. Won't any supernatural being give me tons of money for my soul?
-
[QUOTE=BennieBen;3049456]Wear a shirt with a trans flag on it, with a medical blue face mask, platform shoes with a skirt, hold a big cardboard with some lgbt slogan again ice and maga with some socilalist measure as suggestion written on it like 'Not MAGA, But LFSFT: Let Freespeech FUCK TRUMP! Save my medicare and my gendre transition plan!' and when they come to talk to you you speak to them in a foreign langage then you pull out you cellphone from your pocket very fast and begin to film them while continuing to talk loud in a foreign langage. You should meet your god soon after that.[/QUOTE]As senile as Trump, and bullshiting here many times, like crazy orange all over the world, but not able to use a free weapon and put in his mouth. I'm fully sure mother and her 3 children would like she still lives to take care of them. Shame on Trump and ICE, behaving like in Iran.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3049339]Despite the dumbass comments on wind turbines by the senile foul-mouth MAGA Fuhrer, at the WC Forum (and similar anti-wind turbine sentiments from ISG-MAGA acolytes), the EU (Britain, Germany, Denmark Norway, Netherlands and other European countries) announced they will be signing an agreement to jointly install 100GW of offshore wind turbines, and 20GW by the year 2030, in large scale joint projects.[/QUOTE]How those solar panels work when covered up by 6 feet of snow? How those windmills churning when their blades are frozen solid? Show me where in the LOC formula where climate is covered. Or are you just once again spouting off a number without knowing what is behind the calculation? Is this climate change all over again?
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/german-chancellor-merz-admits-shutting-down-nuclear-energy-production-was-severe-strategic[/URL]
And while you are praising Europe for going green, they are running the other way going back to natural gas and saying shutting down nuclear was a mistake.
Yeah, the LCOE is going to look real good for solar and wind after natural gas prices went through the roof. [URL]https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/natural-gas[/URL]
As for why we still need coal there is this: Coal plants carried weeks — sometimes months — of fuel on site. That fuel was already purchased, already delivered, and already insulated from real-time weather events. Coal did not compete with residential heating demand. It did not depend on pipeline pressure, compressor stations, or wellhead performance. When the temperature dropped, coal plants did not enter a bidding war with homeowners for survival. They simply ran.
That mattered because coal often sat at or near the margin during winter peaks. And when coal is the marginal fuel, prices behave differently. They move modestly. They reflect cost, not fear. They do not explode because of perceived scarcity three states away.
Contrast that with today's system. Natural gas now sets the price in much of the country. Gas does not need to fail to become expensive; it only needs to be stressed. Cold weather alone is enough. Add pipeline congestion, freeze-offs, or even the risk of nonperformance, and markets immediately inject a scarcity premium. Wholesale electric prices spike — even if every generator shows up and no emergency is declared.
It is worth asking a simple, uncomfortable question: If coal still dominated the electric grid the way it once did, would this cold snap even matter?
From a consumer perspective, the answer is largely no.
So yeah, solar and wind may be cheaper but they fail just when you need them most whereas coal is reliable and does not stick the consumer with massive price shocks when winter storms roll in. The batteries used with solar and wind are depleted in no time. Coal stores energy better than anything in freezing cold weather.
In Texas which produces more alternative energy than anywhere, and a cold snap will be a few days. It makes sense there. When you start talking the northern USA, this weather can last for months!
Man, I am so seek of you and Tooms lecture what Americans should do from abroad. You should have been stuck in the Northern USA going without power or paying electrical bills through the nose like everyone else. But you do not practice what you preach!
-
World War 3 please!
-
MAGA's Orwellian Asymmetric Civil War in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
As the despicable and barbarian MAGA Fuhrer's Gestapo Brownshirts (ICE), [I][b]murder and gun-down Americans citizens and civilians in cold blood,[/b][/I] the shit-show complicit MAGA admin, once again dips, drives and delves into its Orwellian bag of tricks and lies, as they tell Americans, not to believe what your eyes are telling you, in the peaceful protesting deaths of two (2) USA Citizens Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
[B]For Trump, the Truth in Minneapolis Is What He Says It Is,[/B] January 25th, 2025, [URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/us/politics/trump-truth-minneapolis-shootings.html[/URL].
[QUOTE]Twice since the start of the year, federal officers have gunned down protesters in Minneapolis with cellphone cameras rolling, and twice President Trump and his lieutenants have rushed forward with a message to the American people: Dont believe what you see with your own eyes.[/QUOTE]So as the MAGA Fuhrer, tells America, to deny what they're seeing and continues to treat Americans, like he's talking to his gullible MAGA base, even as bystander video evidence makes it very clear, for all to see (for those without MAGA rose colored glasses), that he and his corrupt MAGA admin are telling more lies, once again.
Welcome to the MAGA Fuhrer Orwellian era!
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3049558]As senile as Trump, and bullshiting here many times, like crazy orange all over the world, but not able to use a free weapon and put in his mouth. I'm fully sure mother and her 3 children would like she still lives to take care of them. Shame on Trump and ICE, behaving like in Iran.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/multiple-polls-show-majority-americans-want-all-illegals-deported[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3049638]Come on already![/QUOTE]You have nothing to hope in your life? Beautiful girls to fuck with a not mini dick, or sports, or else, when I dream to free ride my fall then die spots, or bicycle climb my legendary mountains. I wish in not too long, to have full time to perform them. Still so many dreams to live for real, as long I will be able.
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3049638]Come on already![/QUOTE]It never happened!
-
3 photos
Trump's Tariffs aren't working as advertised
Shocker. Trump's record high increase in American Consumer Taxes is producing the opposite result of what he said it would do.
Man, he really has those foreign importers on the run, now! LOL. Remember when I said every other world leader would be champing at the bit to get a seat opposite numbskull Trump at any negotiation table anywhere at anytime? Lolol.
[B]Trade balance soared 94% in November and was higher than a year ago[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/29/trade-balance-soared-94percent-in-november-and-was-higher-than-a-year-ago-despite-tariff-efforts.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The U.S. deficit with its global trading partners nearly doubled in November as the shortfall with the European Union swelled.
Following a month where the trade deficit hit its lowest level since early 2009, it shot up to $56.8 billion, an increase of 94.6% from October.
...........
On a year-over-year basis, the deficit through November stood at $839.5 billion, or about[b] 4% higher than the same period in 2024.[/b]
The increase in the deficit counters Trumps efforts to use tariffs to reduce imbalances around the globe. When announcing so-called reciprocal tariffs in April 2025, the White House used the level of trade deficits with varying countries as a baseline for determining the duties.[/QUOTE]They're loving it; Trump declares an "EMERGENCY!" as his lamebrain reason to increase American Consumer Taxes and, consequently, the price of goods the American Consumers want and sometimes must buy, Americans pay those increased prices, and the foreign importers still manage to eat America's lunch on trade even more than before Trump pulled more money out of Americans' pockets for those goods.
Further confirmation that the last people you should call for aid at a time of EMERGENCY is anyone from the Republican Party but most especially any one of them named or associated with Trump.
Add this to The Economy, National Security, Immigration, Infrastructure, Inflation Reduction, Energy Efficiency, Computer Chips, Science, Bi-Partisan Legislation and keeping the USA Government Open and Functioning to the long list of important economic and national security metrics that Joe Biden and his Vice President understood better and produced better results on than anything blithering blathering cognitively impaired Donald Trump ever has, ever will or ever could.
-
Electrostate v Petrostate: Cold Snap drops oil / gas output, that can't keep grid up
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3049586]How those solar panels work when covered up by 6 feet of snow? How those windmills churning when their blades are frozen solid? Show me where in the LOC formula where climate is covered. Or are you just once again spouting off a number without knowing what is behind the calculation? Is this climate change all over again? [/QUOTE][I]Duh! ...[/I]everyone knows, that output drops when snow covers a solar panel, and smart operators should naturally plan for it. But as petrol-heads insistently drown on about the failures of solar and wind, perhaps they should, they should why oil and gas output have also dropped in the 2026 frigid winter cold snap?
[QUOTE][b]US energy sector braces for winter storm as crude and natural gas output fall[/b] Jan 24th, 2026. U.S. crude output is set to slip as the [b]cold snap and stormy conditions push operators to shut in production in key basins,[/b] according to state regulators and analysts. That could lead to a total loss of around 300,000 barrels per day, said Energy Aspects, adding that the production outage could climb further.
[u]The storm could cut 86 billion cubic feet of natural gas production over the next two weeks,[/u] Energy Aspects said, noting that the Appalachia region could lose 35 bcf of output.
[url]https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/us-energy-sector-braces-winter-storm-crude-natural-gas-output-fall-2026-01-23/[/url][/QUOTE]Tell me again, how will a [I]U.S. grid,[/I] that runs 60% on fossil fuels, is going to power itself on fossil fuels going forward, when it can even get passed a winter storm, where production levels of oil and gas drastically drop off during a storm?
[U]5th Grade Maths:[/U]
However, it seems you still can't do basic 5th grade math, from my last post? Well here allow me to help with your 5th grade math assignment, I left with you.
60 is bigger than 15. [NOPARSE]In fact it is exactly 4x times bigger. So when the USA Electricity grid is powered by 60% fossil fuels, and only 15% solar and wind, it's only far that when the grid fails, fossil fuels should shoulders 4x times the [/NOPARSE]blame.
Remember though, the real blame (like Texas 2021), in this 2026 winter storm, comes down to poor grid management, downed lines and insufficient preparedness, resulting in grid failure.
[B]PS:[/B] By contrast, there was an abundance of wind generation as the storm rips through parts of New Mexico and Oklahoma.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3049586]How those solar panels work when covered up by 6 feet of snow? How those windmills churning when their blades are frozen solid? Show me where in the LOC formula where climate is covered. Or are you just once again spouting off a number without knowing what is behind the calculation? Is this climate change all over again?
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/german-chancellor-merz-admits-shutting-down-nuclear-energy-production-was-severe-strategic[/URL]
And while you are praising Europe for going green, they are running the other way going back to natural gas and saying shutting down nuclear was a mistake.
Yeah, the LCOE is going to look real good for solar and wind after natural gas prices went through the roof. [URL]https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/natural-gas[/URL]
As for why we still need coal there is this: Coal plants carried weeks sometimes months of fuel on site. That fuel was already purchased, already delivered, and already insulated from real-time weather events. Coal did not compete with residential heating demand. It did not depend on pipeline pressure, compressor stations, or wellhead performance. When the temperature dropped, coal plants did not enter a bidding war with homeowners for survival. They simply ran.
That mattered because coal often sat at or near the margin during winter peaks. And when coal is the marginal fuel, prices behave differently. They move modestly. They reflect cost, not fear. They do not explode because of perceived scarcity three states away.
Contrast that with today's system. Natural gas now sets the price in much of the country. Gas does not need to fail to become expensive; it only needs to be stressed. Cold weather alone is enough. Add pipeline congestion, freeze-offs, or even the risk of nonperformance, and markets immediately inject a scarcity premium. Wholesale electric prices spike even if every generator shows up and no emergency is declared.
It is worth asking a simple, uncomfortable question: If coal still dominated the electric grid the way it once did, would this cold snap even matter?
From a consumer perspective, the answer is largely no.
So yeah, solar and wind may be cheaper but they fail just when you need them most whereas coal is reliable and does not stick the consumer with massive price shocks when winter storms roll in. The batteries used with solar and wind are depleted in no time. Coal stores energy better than anything in freezing cold weather.
In Texas which produces more alternative energy than anywhere, and a cold snap will be a few days. It makes sense there. When you start talking the northern USA, this weather can last for months!
Man, I am so seek of you and Tooms lecture what Americans should do from abroad. You should have been stuck in the Northern USA going without power or paying electrical bills through the nose like everyone else. But you do not practice what you preach![/QUOTE]Just do what usa is good to do, do business. You have Quebec next to your north-eastern border, massively invest in their dam, they are buidling dam under the water now. They are building thousands of them and they are almost impossible to detect without advanced satelite technology. Ask them to give you acces to plant some military base to defend your asset and offer them the deal of the millenium. A long term contract of like a cantury in which they will get richer then any oil producer and on your side do your are doing money by selling it back to amarican citizen and to the south american country. They have like 50% of their land covered of river and lake, its enough to produce enrgy for the whole world. In less then 50 years you could had all the american continent supplied with green energy who could charge your electric vehicule and heat your house. The air pollution would drop so fast, the continent air quality would be back to what it was when you was hunting bison and fighting the native. This is how you can make the place new and different, the current generation are sick of pollution, do something cleaner then every where and you are back on top for the rest of the 21th century.
-
Quebec has its own power constraints
[QUOTE=BennieBen;3050008]Just do what usa is good to do, do business. You have Quebec next to your north-eastern border, massively invest in their dam..[/QUOTE]The only thing I can verify, is that, yes indeed, Quebec is a province on the American northeastern boarders. As for the rest of the post, I'll let Elvis 2008, decipher that!
The other point of contention, is that although Quebec, has in the past, been a major supplier of clean electricity to the [I]U.S. Northeast[/I], it appears to be having, its own domestic supply issues.
[B]Why Quebec struck a new hydro deal with Newfoundland and Labrador[/B], December 13,2025, [URL]https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/hydro-quebec-newfoundland-churchill-deal-1.7409673[/URL]
Currently, Quebec is negotiating to import power from Newfoundland and Labrador, and to be able to meet contractual obligations with the [I]U.S.[/I], as it looks to shore up it own supply, because its own electricity demands are growing faster than its current supply can meet, especially during peak periods.
-
[QUOTE=EnterTheV;3049780]It never happened![/QUOTE]Nothing so sure with crazy like Trump or Putin. Fortunately, Netanyahou doesn't have enough power, when war is his business. Americans who miss real democracy should look what happened in Romania on Autumn 1989.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3050341]The only thing I can verify, is that, yes indeed, Quebec is a province on the American northeastern boarders. As for the rest of the post, I'll let Elvis 2008, decipher that!
The other point of contention, is that although Quebec, has in the past, been a major supplier of clean electricity to the [I]U.S. Northeast[/I], it appears to be having, its own domestic supply issues.
[B]Why Quebec struck a new hydro deal with Newfoundland and Labrador[/B], December 13,2025, [URL]https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/hydro-quebec-newfoundland-churchill-deal-1.7409673[/URL]
Currently, Quebec is negotiating to import power from Newfoundland and Labrador, and to be able to meet contractual obligations with the [I]U.S.[/I], as it looks to shore up it own supply, because its own electricity demands are growing faster than its current supply can meet, especially during peak periods.[/QUOTE]Trump madness and chaotic governance pushed them to stop their investment in dam construction targeting the amercican market I suppose. That why they signed contract who are keep the domstic consumption in priority and exportation in 2nd.
-
You want to die so badly
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3049638]Come on already![/QUOTE]Get on a plane already and visit a DEI "doctor" in Brasilia LOLOL.
[URL]https://english.elpais.com/international/2026-02-02/brazil-shocked-to-find-that-13000-students-about-to-graduate-from-medical-school-lack-basic-knowledge-to-practice-medicine.html[/URL]
Nao obrigado.
Just another reason to avoid that God forsaken shithole at all costs.
-
Get a clue
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3048824]After a mother with 3 children, now a 5 yo child, USA fall really crazy under so dangerous and for citizens, Trump. Wake up.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKKhUOvlv_I[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=BennieBen;3050538]Trump madness and chaotic governance pushed them to stop their investment in dam construction targeting the American market I suppose. That why they signed contract who are keep the domstic consumption in priority and exportation in 2nd.[/QUOTE]The problem with this TDS madness is that it gets blamed for everything. Yeah, Bennie, when I looked into Canada and their hydroelectric potential, it was great. Then you look at real estate prices, immigrants surging, crime rates in Canada, the political leadership, and especially the shit Ottawa pulled with the Covid trucker's strike, and I would not want to put a penny into Canada right now.
I grew up near Canada and I considered Canadians and Americans interchangeable. Even when W Bush came into power, and one USD would buy $1. 50 Canadian, I thought Canada was greatly undervalued. They balanced their budget, were not fighting stupid wars, and even provided free / national healthcare. Their cities were crime free models many American cities that many American city wanted to emulate. And ten years, the Canadian and American dollar were equal in value.
But Canada cow towed to their women who were no longer having kids, and Canada tried to fix their population problem with immigration and unlike the USA (well, unlike the USA except under Biden) they let in so many immigrants they lost their culture. Housing prices skyrocketed, crime rates soared, and the Canadian culture IMO is dead replaced by a version of liberalism that would make California blush.
In 2001, Canada was nirvana for the monger. Lap dances were $14 not $20, and the escorts were beautiful, plentiful, and legal. Now we are at one USA dollar buying $1. 37 Canadian and I think the USA dollar is undervalued. The nanny state is so strong there that Americans with one DWI are not let into the country. If you invest in Canada, you often cannot get your money out. The hostility towards the USA, even before Trump, is unreal.
The notion that Mexico is dangerous and Canada is safe has IMO been tossed on its head and given how much cheaper Mexico is, I would rather put money to work in Mexico, and it is not even close. In fact, the average Mexican worker is outperforming his Canadian counterpart. The ratio of USA dollars to Canadian would have to hit 2:1 before it would interest me.
And why would I put money into an area that is subject to the whims of pols? Hell, the keystone pipeline was this red-blue jerk around with Warren Buffett the Dems biggest antagonist. I cannot even imagine investing in dams and power lines in crazy Canada and the brain dead blue regions in the Northeastern USA. I drive throughout West Texas, and there could be a 100 X more windmills than the huge amounts they have right now. The issue is not building the wind mills but the power lines to get the energy to market. Even in the huge Permian field, there was an issue with getting oil and gas to market from there, and electricity is even more constrained than oil and gas.
And Spidy is a symptom of the liberal left and their lunacy on energy generation. He did not back off one iota when the cold spells left so many people without power when they needed it most. The liberal idiots attacked coal in the USA while China and India were constructing huge coal burning plants. Even today, Spidy is advocating Europe and its green energy policies. Look at what happened in Germany with nuclear: [URL]https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Germany/nuclear_power_generation/[/URL].
And to meet their mandated carbon reductions, Germany imported massive amounts of natural gas from Putin. For all the Dems and their liberal bullshit talk about Putin, it was their idiotic energy policies that enriched Putin.
So yeah, in theory, Canadian hydroelectric could be a great solution to meet the surging demand for electricity, and kudos to you for bring up a subject I did not know about, but I would not touch it given the political reality.
-
Oh well. We tried.
Repub Trump is already the only so-called president since Repub Hoover, almost a hundred years ago, to leave office with fewer jobs in the USA economy than when he started his term. Now he very well might become the only so-called president to TWICE leave office in TWO separate terms with fewer jobs in the USA economy than when he started. Wow.
[B]Private payrolls rose by just 22,000, far short of expectations, ADP says[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/04/adp-jobs-report-january-2026.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The U.S. labor market barely budged in January, with hiring below even muted expectations, according to a report Wednesday from payrolls processing firm ADP.
Private companies added just 22,000 positions for the month and [b]the number would have been negative had it not been for a surge of 74,000 hires in the education and health services category. The total was less than the downwardly revised 37,000 increase in December and below the Dow Jones consensus forecast for 45,000.[/b][/QUOTE]You MAGAs really know how to pick them! Lolol.
I wonder if Trump will also outdo himself on the issue of Mass Murder of Americans this 2nd time around. I suppose it will all depend on how much of a distraction from the 38,000 mentions of him in the Epstein Files he calculates another Trump's Pandemic might provide. Due to the disastrous decisions he made in his first term, his Mass Murder victim count for Americans alone has so far numbered over 1 million. Then there were millions more Trump Mass Murder victims around the world.
The Worst Jobs Creation numbers AND the Most Mass Murder Victims numbers all in one presidency is, uh, quite a feat, even for a Repub.
Well, that's what those dumb Repub MAGA hillbillies voted for in an election that was clinched for them by that relatively tiny handful of angry Muslims spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered:
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR4yoQ-EXd8/?igsh=bXEydzY1a3EwZ3Jn[/URL]
-
2 photos
Oh well. Yep, we tried.
Nope. No wild coincidence. No witch's curse. No bad luck for Repubs. No weird economic or business cycle that only favors Dems and punishes Repubs.
Nope.
It's crap Repub economic policies and stewardship. Every time. For about 100 years.
And, sure enough, there's that ol" reliable and utterly predictable Worst Since a Previous Repub Economic Disaster designation!
[B]Layoffs in January were the highest to start a year since 2009, Challenger says[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/05/layoff-and-hiring-announcements-hit-their-worst-january-levels-since-2009-challenger-says.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]U.S. employers announced 108,435 layoffs for the month, [B]up 118% from the same period a year ago and 205% from December 2025. The total marked the highest for any January since 2009.[/B]
At the same time, companies announced[B] just 5,306 new hires, also the lowest January since 2009, which is when Challenger, Gray & Christmas began tracking such data.[/b][/QUOTE]MAGAs and that decisive tiny handful of angry Muslims spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered, PA, MI and WI, sure FAFO real good this time.
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR4yoQ-EXd8/?igsh=bXEydzY1a3EwZ3Jn[/URL]
-
3 photos
Welcome to TrumpRepubCare
After 16 years of thinking and thinking and thinking about it, this is the best TrumpRepub alternative to Obamacare that Trump and his Repubs have come up with.
I mean, other than the classic Repub concept of a healthcare plan for America; If you get sick, get a lot sicker quickly and die soon.
[B]Millions may drop ACA coverage and raise health insurance costs for everyone else[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/04/millions-may-drop-aca-coverage-and-raise-health-costs-for-everyone-else.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Enhanced premium subsidies for consumers who buy health insurance on the Affordable Care Act marketplace expired at the end of 2025.
About 22 million people received those enhanced premium tax credits last year.
Their premiums more than doubled, on average, in 2026 due to the lapse, according to KFF.
[B]Millions of people are expected to drop their coverage amid soaring costs, which will likely raise premiums for everyone who remains, experts said.[/b]
Some experts warn of a potential death spiral in the ACA market if millions of young, healthy people drop their coverage.[/QUOTE]Yes, those subsidies were supposed to be temporary. But that was when it was reasonably assumed the economic damage to American jobs and incomes from Trump's Pandemic would be fully recovered by Biden-Harris and the Dems in Congress. And, sure enough, it was recovered faster and stronger in America than anywhere else on the Planet; The Envy of the World Economy by November 2024.
However, since Repub Donald Trump became president again, well, we're heading back to the same or worse economic conditions Trump produced that triggered the need for those subsidies and back to the disastrous economic conditions Repub GW Bush produced to trigger the desperate need for Obamacare in the first place.
No more Envy of the World Economy now.
Consequently, this was a particularly bad time to eliminate those subsidies.
Oh well. We tried.
Thank you for your vote:
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR4yoQ-EXd8/?igsh=bXEydzY1a3EwZ3Jn[/URL]
-
Again, what new Quebec investment dams, is it?
[QUOTE=BennieBen;3050538]Trump madness and chaotic governance pushed them to stop their investment in dam construction targeting the amercican market I suppose. That why they signed contract who are keep the domstic consumption in priority and exportation in 2nd.[/QUOTE]I still have no idea, what investment Quebec dams, you're talking about? Whether they be newly planned, in construction or either being developed, [NOPARSE]please provide the news article and/or link to the information, to which you're referring to?
The last Quebec dam build, planned or developed (that I know of), was the Romaine-4 hydroelectric plant (which is part of the La Romaine complex in Quebec), which finished in 2023, long before the MAGA Fuhrer's 2nd term chaos.
And despite, Elvis 2008's, wrongheaded and nonsensical rant on Canada, the U.S. is desperate and would love to have Canadian hydro power (and other resources). Empathizes on "desperate", as the MAGA Fuhrer, would love to make Canada the 51st [/NOPARSE]state.
-
Debunked MAGA Worldview of Canada
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3050710]The problem with this TDS madness is that it gets blamed for everything. [/QUOTE]Yeah, and yet you MAGAs, as gullible as you are, still I bet, wonder where the infamous quote, [I]"Everything thing Trump touches turns to shit!"[/I] comes from? LOL!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3050710]Yeah, Bennie, when I looked into Canada and their hydroelectric potential, it was great. Then you look at real estate prices, immigrants surging, crime rates in Canada, the political leadership, and especially the shit Ottawa pulled with the Covid trucker's strike, and I would not want to put a penny into Canada right now.
I grew up near Canada and I considered Canadians and Americans interchangeable.[/QUOTE]What utter garbage on Canada! Immigration maybe higher, but not viewed in the same way, as the current shit-show MAGA admin. Also pretty sure, while Americans and Canadians, consider themselves neighboring border cousins (for lack of a better term), the use of the world [I][b]"interchangeable"[/b][/I] to describe us, is morally just all kinds of wrong!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3050710]I cannot even imagine investing in dams and power lines in crazy Canada and the brain dead blue regions in the Northeastern USA. I drive throughout West Texas, and there could be a 100 X more windmills than the huge amounts they have right now.
So yeah, in theory, Canadian hydroelectric could be a great solution to meet the surging demand for electricity, and kudos to you for bring up a subject I did not know about, but I would not touch it given the political reality.[/QUOTE]Apart from the current long standing PPA contracts, that the northeast corridor of states have with Quebec (or Ontario), do you even know what the fuck, new Quebec dam investments Bennie is talking about? Or should I just assume, [I]this is your "womanly" period of the mouth, but for you, it's "foot-in-mouth" disease[/I]?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3050710] The issue is not building the wind mills but the power lines to get the energy to market. Even in the huge Permian field, there was an issue with getting oil and gas to market from there, and electricity is even more constrained than oil and gas.[/QUOTE][I]Glad you finally wised up,[/I] to what I've been telling you all along about the electricity struggles and poor stewardship of the grid, during the winter storm, rather then the usual MAGA blame of solar and wind. See here: [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3049863&viewfull=1#post3049863[/URL]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3050710]And Spidy is a symptom of the liberal left and their lunacy on energy generation. He did not back off one iota when the cold spells left so many people without power when they needed it most. The liberal idiots attacked coal in the USA while China and India were constructing huge coal burning plants. [/QUOTE]Nah, the "liberal idiots" verbally attack, the continued use of coal, equally, wherever it's happening, while promoting and fostering cooperative relationships for cleaner, fossil-free solutions. Unlike like the smarmy petrostate hypocrites, that plunder, rape and pillage other countries for their fossil fuels, in the name "drug trafficking" and "national security", while at the same time criticize China and India, for their air-pollution and using coal, as they make great efforts to transition away from fossil fuels, while they DO NOT.
[QUOTE]Even today, Spidy is advocating Europe and its green energy policies. Look at what happened in Germany with nuclear: [URL]https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Germany/nuclear_power_generation/[/URL] ...
And to meet their mandated carbon reductions, Germany imported massive amounts of natural gas from Putin. For all the Dems and their liberal bullshit talk about Putin, it was their idiotic energy policies that enriched Putin.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I sure "drill-baby-drill" MAGAs, would also love to see Germany, keep importing massive amounts of "expensive LNG gas", at 2 x to 3 x the cost of Russian gas, from the USA, right.
See my previous post (to the other MAGA LCOE neophyte) on, Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Electricity Grid Infrastructure is Key! Nevertheless, as I already explained, the major impact and cause of "soaring energy bills" in Germany, is also due to the following three (3) critical things: [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3046562&viewfull=1#post3046562[/URL] Difference is Germany's future, is better off for it, going forward.
So while [I]the U.S.[/I] (under the MAGA Fuhrer) continues to blame renewables, and stumbles to upgrade its grid responsiveness and readiness, in the wake of the 2026 winter storm, Germany is learning from its gas contract mistakes, by making significant progress in electrifying its heating sector, developing large-scale heat pumps, leveraging geothermal energy, and advancing heat storage technologies.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3050889]I still have no idea, what investment Quebec dams, you're talking about? Whether they be newly planned, in construction or either being developed, [NOPARSE]please provide the news article and/or link to the information, to which you're referring to?
The last Quebec dam build, planned or developed (that I know of), was the Romaine-4 hydroelectric plant (which is part of the La Romaine complex in Quebec), which finished in 2023, long before the MAGA Fuhrer's 2nd term chaos.
And despite, Elvis 2008's, wrongheaded and nonsensical rant on Canada, the U.S. is desperate and would love to have Canadian hydro power (and other resources). Empathizes on "desperate", as the MAGA Fuhrer, would love to make Canada the 51st [/NOPARSE]state.[/QUOTE][URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_generating_stations_in_Quebec[/URL]
I never said they was building one by day, my point was that Dam arent like people think they are, they are not all single huge concrete wall who can be blowed with 1 explosion to shut down the electricity all over america in a single shot. So trying to produce it localy with coal for some knid of safety issue is bullshit, expensive and poisonning the air.
USA is sit next to a state who would happily sell enough clean energy for all the usa needs and all of this in canadian pesos. But american are so dumb and they are totaly mesmerized by their billionaire oligarch verbal diarrhea.
-
Biological Warfare
Apparently, the rogue Chinese bio lab found in Las Vegas contained 1,000 weaponized mice bioengineered to serve as vectors for Covid-19. The bio lab was hidden in the garage of an Airbnb property, and people who entered the unit reported becoming deathly ill. There are whispers that the Chinese mastermind intended to use the mice to infect mongers and gamblers with the deadly virus, and have them unknowingly spread it around the world as they traveled from Las Vegas.
-
Just more monkey business from the DNC
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3050844]Nope. No wild coincidence. No witch's curse. No bad luck for Repubs. No weird economic or business cycle that only favors Dems and punishes Repubs.
Nope.
It's crap Repub economic policies and stewardship. Every time. For about 100 years.
And, sure enough, there's that ol" reliable and utterly predictable Worst Since a Previous Repub Economic Disaster designation!
[B]Layoffs in January were the highest to start a year since 2009, Challenger says[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/05/layoff-and-hiring-announcements-hit-their-worst-january-levels-since-2009-challenger-says.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
MAGAs and that decisive tiny handful of angry Muslims spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered, PA, MI and WI, sure FAFO real good this time.
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR4yoQ-EXd8/?igsh=bXEydzY1a3EwZ3Jn[/URL][/QUOTE][URL]https://x.com/xerias_x/status/1981716010483753013?s=42[/URL]
-
Less tourists spending money in USA under facist racist Trump. Big inflation, less jobs, the failure of the crazy senile orange. Murdering in Minneapolis don't pay.
-
Yeah butt you're pretty wrong
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3047385]No, this is me telling you that you are an arrogant ass. I understand Dems who vote the way they do because it is in their best interest, but you have no clue as to why people vote Republican. What you keep repeating is that MAGA people are stupid when the truth is you are a narrow minded, egotistical blockhead. And if you are voting Democrat as a form of identity versus how Democrats are actually performing for you, your mindset is a danger to Democracy.
You and Tooms go on and on about how terrible the economy is. But do you talk to people who actually live here? And if you did and those people said they are doing great under Trump or in my case that I have not noticed much difference between Trump and Biden, how would you respond? The appropriate response is to balance what is in the news with what you are hearing personally. But what you and Tooms do is insult the people living here if they do not agree with you. If you are doing better under Trump, you must be stupid. Everyone is doing worse!
Now I am sure there are people and businesses who have been hurt by tariffs, but the tsunami of predicted inflation has not shown up in my life or in the government's own number. Thing is that you ignore the ones doing better because of tariffs. In fact, if you are a typical Dem, it is impossible that anyone could be doing better because of tariffs when that is just not true.
LOL. No, it is the same reason. If a nation is not the low cost producer of an item, the government playbook is always the same. You give taxpayer subsidies to the industries you want in your country. You claim the products of the nation who can produce a good more cheaply are not safe. "We can't be dependent on American only data centers. We need our own!" and you put taxes on the goods from that other country, and you know what those taxes are called? They are called tariffs.
So, no, Europe cannot compete with the USA on a level playing field with data centers, so Europe titled the field. Your shining example of European success and green energy would go tits up without government assistance.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFXRoKzWFR0[/URL]*.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCdkTdh_PZ8[/URL]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEyVTR07MlM[/URL]*.
-
Oren On Fire, I really love this Jew, he would make an amazing President
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3050721]Repub Trump is already the only so-called president since Repub Hoover, almost a hundred years ago, to leave office with fewer jobs in the USA economy than when he started his term. Now he very well might become the only so-called president to TWICE leave office in TWO separate terms with fewer jobs in the USA economy than when he started. Wow.
[B]Private payrolls rose by just 22,000, far short of expectations, ADP says[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/04/adp-jobs-report-january-2026.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
You MAGAs really know how to pick them! Lolol.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/06/opinion/capitalism-industry-financialization.html[/URL]
He was Economic adviser to Mitt for his campaigns for the WH.
Cass for President 2028 with my other favorite Jew Stephen Miller as VP to handle other domestic policies.
"Well, that's what those dumb Repub MAGA hillbillies voted for in an election that was clinched for them by that relatively tiny handful of angry Muslims spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered".
WTF dum Repub MAGA hillbillies? I don't know the avg MAGA IQ but I will be you $100 k cash money, its at least 2 or 3 SDs higher then the low IQ mental midgets that voted for Brain dead Harris.
You constantly love to bash Muslims so much? Why don't you blame the black males that voted for Our Lord and Savior those intelligent voters helped save America.
From the likes of the America hating, Harris voting trash!
-
Check out this POS
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3050852]After 16 years of thinking and thinking and thinking about it, this is the best TrumpRepub alternative to Obamacare that Trump and his Repubs have come up with.
I mean, other than the classic Repub concept of a healthcare plan for America; If you get sick, get a lot sicker quickly and die soon.
[B]Millions may drop ACA coverage and raise health insurance costs for everyone else[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/04/millions-may-drop-aca-coverage-and-raise-health-costs-for-everyone-else.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL].[/QUOTE]You need an ID to buy a Beer or a Vape or to get anywhere near him.
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/02/06/sen-ossoff-to-require-id-at-campaign-rally-while-he-fights-id-requirements-to-vote/[/URL]
-
It's only a matter of time
I'm thinking weeks, possibly months. But World War 3 should be upon us soon, and I'm looking forward to it. I hope I get vaporized by the first wave of nukes so I won't be feeling any pain. All that being said, I'm praying to Lucifer the Light-Bringer that I get to hobby one last time in Bangkok before the nukes launch. How awesome would it be if I was on a plane when the end came? Get it? Came? Ha!
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JSRauM78_0[/URL]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaqDptraCEk[/URL]
The end is near, and it's so beautiful. This is all we deserve as humanity. I never thought I'd live to see Armageddon, fuck I'm old. Now. Where's the pussy at?
-
Hot damn, an energy discussion!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3050917]Nah, the "liberal idiots" verbally attack, the continued use of coal, equally, wherever it's happening, while promoting and fostering cooperative relationships for cleaner, fossil-free solutions. [/QUOTE]Except for China, which accepts reality, that it needs coal to provide firm baseload supply.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3050710]He did not back off one iota when the cold spells left so many people without power when they needed it most. [/QUOTE]What do you expect? He's fixated on LCOE. He bizarrely believes that solar and wind are more reliable than natural gas and fuel oil during weather events. He probably doesn't realize utilities have fuel oil stocks and gas storage fields to handle cold spells. And doesn't appear to understand that you must have natural gas, coal, and/or nuclear plants for reliable baseload power, unless you live someplace like Quebec or New Zealand.
For the bigger picture, ignoring weather events, by focusing just on LCOE, he ignores a lot of costs. For example, the cost of transmission build-out, new and upgraded substations, etc. He fails to consider that storage for wind and solar is expensive. And extremely expensive more than 6 hours out. Please note on an average day with good weather you can only get meaningful solar generation for about 4 to 6 hours. For wind the average is 6 to 10 hours a day.
[QUOTE=BennieBen;3050008](Quebecois) have like 50% of their land covered of river and lake, its enough to produce enrgy for the whole world. [/QUOTE]BAHAHAHAHA!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3049863][I]Duh! ...[/I]everyone knows, that output drops when snow covers a solar panel, and smart operators should naturally plan for it. But as petrol-heads insistently drown on about the failures of solar and wind, perhaps they should, they should why oil and gas output have also dropped in the 2026 frigid winter cold snap?
Tell me again, how will a [I]U.S. grid,[/I] that runs 60% on fossil fuels, is going to power itself on fossil fuels going forward, when it can even get passed a winter storm, where production levels of oil and gas drastically drop off during a storm?
[/QUOTE]Gas production fell by maybe 10% nationwide during the "2026 frigid winter cold snap. " But withdrawals from gas storage fields made up for a lot of that, and in some areas all of it. Generation from solar nationwide fell by 60% to 90%, and wind fell by 30% to 60%.
Electricity generation from fuel oil and diesel (that is, oil) on the other hand increased a lot. During peak demand it accounted for 40%+ of power generation in New York and some other states in the northeast. Normally fuel oil and diesel account for less than 1% of power generation in New York.
Percentages above, except BennieBen's, are from ChatGPT.
Thank goodness for fossil fuels! Without them a lot of people would have gotten very cold.
I will correct you a second time. Production levels of oil are irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Nobody uses oil based products for power generation at scale because the electricity costs too much. Except in some blue states during freezes, because Democratic Party politicians hindered and prevented construction of gas pipelines.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3049863][U]5th Grade Maths:[/U]
However, it seems you still can't do basic 5th grade math, from my last post? Well here allow me to help with your 5th grade math assignment, I left with you.
60 is bigger than 15. [NOPARSE]In fact it is exactly 4x times bigger. So when the USA Electricity grid is powered by 60% fossil fuels, and only 15% solar and wind, it's only far that when the grid fails, fossil fuels should shoulders 4x times the [/NOPARSE]blame.[/QUOTE]BAHAHAHAHAHA!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3049863]Remember though, the real blame (like Texas 2021), in this 2026 winter storm, comes down to poor grid management, downed lines and insufficient preparedness, resulting in grid failure.
[B]PS:[/B] By contrast, there was an abundance of wind generation as the storm rips through parts of New Mexico and Oklahoma.[/QUOTE]You are correct, the 2026 blackouts in Texas were caused by poor grid management. ERCOT, which manages the grid, prioritized some residential and other areas over oil and gas fields, gas plants, and pipeline compressors. When electricity was shut off to the hydrocarbon producing, processing and transportation infrastructure, equipment froze up and couldn't be restarted. Gas pipeline and processing companies sounded the alarm, but ERCOT wouldn't listen. This isn't a mistake that will be repeated in Texas.
Because my flight was cancelled, and American Airline rebooked me on a flight four days out, I drove from DFW airport to Lubbock on the coldest day of the 2021 Texas deep freeze in a rental car. The route took me through the most prolific wind generating area in Texas. And the wind wasn't blowing. The windmills weren't turning.
-
Racist MAGA Fuhrer shows his true racist colors
[B]Trump's racist post about Obamas is deleted after backlash,[/B] Feb 05,2025 [URL]https://apnews.com/article/trump-obama-racist-video-a48a6b8884a88f9ec30cd4913e352b51[/URL].
I would imagine, the so called [B]"fake outrage..."[/B] in the racist mind of the fake blonde bimbo, WH Press Secretary, can only mean, she thought [U]everyone already knows[/U] the MAGA Fuhrer is a racist, so why all the fuss? LOL!
-
3 photos
Really?
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3051039][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/06/opinion/capitalism-industry-financialization.html[/URL]
He was Economic adviser to Mitt for his campaigns for the WH.
Cass for President 2028 with my other favorite Jew Stephen Miller as VP to handle other domestic policies.
"Well, that's what those dumb Repub MAGA hillbillies voted for in an election that was clinched for them by that relatively tiny handful of angry Muslims spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered".
WTF dum Repub MAGA hillbillies? I don't know the avg MAGA IQ but I will be you $100 k cash money, its at least 2 or 3 SDs higher then the low IQ mental midgets that voted for Brain dead Harris.
You constantly love to bash Muslims so much? Why don't you blame the black males that voted for Our Lord and Savior those intelligent voters helped save America.
From the likes of the America hating, Harris voting trash![/QUOTE]Was he the MittWitt economic campaign advisor who told MittWitt to assure the American people that his historically brilliant Repub economic policies that brought us every Great Depression, Great Recession and Massive Jobs Destruction of the past 100 years would also lower the unemployment rate to 6% within 4 years? Then Obama / Biden went on to lower it below 5% in 6 months or something like that? LOL.
Oh, and please cite the posts and quotes where I "bash Muslims".
I have only pointed out that a tiny handful of angry Muslims who swung their usual vote for the Dem candidate to the Repub candidate in the only 3 swing states that mattered gave the presidency to Trump, that's all. A swing of less than about 114,900 votes from that one demographic out of hundreds of thousands of them in those 3 swing states did it. A swing of about 0. 75 of a single percentage point of them spread across those three states did it.
No blue states flipped from Harris to Trump. None. So whatever percentage of Blacks, Latinos, Asians, Men, whatever Trump gained and Harris lost momentarily on any particular isdue did not matter and had nothing to do with the players on the field or who won the presidency.
It all came down to the one demographic that ordinarily votes for Dems swinging a relatively tiny handful of their votes from Harris to Trump in just those 3 swing states. Which is why that one demographic was targeted so specifically on that one issue in those 3 states. Team Trump and Netanyahu's efforts worked. Just barely. But they worked. It's as simple as that.
Which, BTW, is why it has been so blissfully easy and lightning fast for Trump's poll numbers on his handling of the economy, inflation, immigration, etc to tank. LOL. The typically pro-Repub Mainstream Media was convinced and has tried to convince anyone who would listen that Trump just won the presidency on those and other issues like trannies, crime, pet-eating and so on. So now they are shocked that those "strong issues" for him are collapsing like a house of cards.
But the reality is Trump did NOT win because of those issues. He won for the reason I have been pointing out since the night of the election. So it is easy for the American people to turn on poor baby Trump on the issues that would not and did not really win him anything had that relatively tiny handful of angry Muslims in PA, MI and WI not swung their usual Dem vote to the Repub in response to a single issue that had nothing to do with the economy, inflation, immigration, wokeism, cats and dogs being eaten, where trannies pee and nothing of the kind.
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR4yoQ-EXd8/?igsh=bXEydzY1a3EwZ3Jn[/URL]
-
Well sounds like you're trying to characterize it w / o reading it how typical
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3051090]Was he the MittWitt economic campaign advisor who told MittWitt to assure the American people that his historically brilliant Repub economic policies that brought us every Great Depression, Great Recession and Massive Jobs Destruction of the past 100 years would also lower the unemployment rate to 6% within 4 years? Then Obama / Biden went on to lower it below 5% in 6 months or something like that? LOL.
Oh, and please cite the posts and quotes where I "bash Muslims".
I have only pointed out that a tiny handful of angry Muslims who swung their usual vote for the Dem candidate to the Repub candidate in the only 3 swing states that mattered gave the presidency to Trump, that's all. A swing of less than about 114,900 votes from that one demographic out of hundreds of thousands of them in those 3 swing states did it. A swing of about 0. 75 of a single percentage point of them spread across those three states did it.
No blue states flipped from Harris to Trump. None. So whatever percentage of Blacks, Latinos, Asians, Men, whatever Trump gained and Harris lost momentarily on any particular isdue did not matter and had nothing to do with the players on the field or who won the presidency.[/QUOTE]Yes you constantly bash and use the "Dog whistle" here for your fellow racists / bigots that hate Caucasians (most Muslims are Caucasians).
I'm sure many many more very wise black males voted for Our Lord and Savior to help him handily win the Electoral College and the Popular vote.
BTW I have always extremely loathed Mitt (and have never voted for him).
And I'm sure Mitt hates Oren, which is an Economic Nationalist / Populist and Awesome Patriot.
-
4 photos
I have not seen the evidence of that
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3051129]Yes you constantly bash and use the "Dog whistle" here for your fellow racists / bigots that hate Caucasians (most Muslims are Caucasians).
I'm sure many many more very wise black males voted for Our Lord and Savior to help him handily win the Electoral College and the Popular vote.
BTW I have always extremely loathed Mitt (and have never voted for him).
And I'm sure Mitt hates Oren, which is an Economic Nationalist / Populist and Awesome Patriot.[/QUOTE]Was there an uncharacteristically large surge in black male votes for Trump in PA, MI and WI? Because those were the states whose Electoral College appointments gave the presidency to Trump in 2024. There was no surge of any typically Dem demographic voters that flipped a Blue state's EC appointments to Trump. Since that didn't happen, where are you getting that a move in Black, Latino or any other typically Dem demographic vote from Harris to Trump won him a single decisive EC appointment?
In the only 3 swing states that mattered, PA, MI and WI, there is plenty of evidence that the targeting of the Muslim Community in those 3 states and swinging just enough of those potential votes from Harris to Trump, less than a single percentage point swing among them, is the sole reason the USA now has to pay higher prices for groceries, there have been massive private-sector jobs layoffs, private-sector jobs creation has been practically non existent for over a year, Trillions and Trillions have been added to Trump's deficits with nothing to show for it and on and on.
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/02/swing-state-muslim-leaders-biden-00129758[/URL]
[URL]https://www.dailysabah.com/world/americas/us-muslims-drive-trumps-win-sparking-debate-among-pundits[/URL]
[URL]https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2024/11/08/muslim-voters-in-battle-ground-states-boosted-donald-trump-to-victory/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-earns-endorsement-highly-respected-muslim-leaders-battleground-state[/URL]
And this was a major deciding factor in their tiny handful of swing votes from Harris to Trump that "gave Trump the presidency"; Netanyahu simply delayed honoring the Biden-negotiated May 2024 ceasefire agreement until after the election:
[URL]https://www.trtworld.com/article/18254320[/URL]
An Always Welcome Bonus Video:
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR4yoQ-EXd8/?igsh=bXEydzY1a3EwZ3Jn[/URL]
-
Nice blurb
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3050710]The problem with this TDS madness is that it gets blamed for everything. Yeah, Bennie, when I looked into Canada and their hydroelectric potential, it was great. Then you look at real estate prices, immigrants surging, crime rates in Canada, the political leadership, and especially the shit Ottawa pulled with the Covid trucker's strike, and I would not want to put a penny into Canada right now.
I grew up near Canada and I considered Canadians and Americans interchangeable. Even when W Bush came into power, and one USD would buy $1. 50 Canadian, I thought Canada was greatly undervalued. They balanced their budget, were not fighting stupid wars, and even provided free / national healthcare. Their cities were crime free models many American cities that many American city wanted to emulate. And ten years, the Canadian and American dollar were equal in value.
But Canada cow towed to their women who were no longer having kids, and Canada tried to fix their population problem with immigration and unlike the USA (well, unlike the USA except under Biden) they let in so many immigrants they lost their culture. Housing prices skyrocketed, crime rates soared, and the Canadian culture IMO is dead replaced by a version of liberalism that would make California blush.
In 2001, Canada was nirvana for the monger. Lap dances were $14 not $20, and the escorts were beautiful, plentiful, and legal. Now we are at one USA dollar buying $1. 37 Canadian and I think the USA dollar is undervalued. The nanny state is so strong there that Americans with one DWI are not let into the country. If you invest in Canada, you often cannot get your money out. The hostility towards the USA, even before Trump, is unreal..[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/chris-ruddy-rob-schmitt-trump/2026/02/06/id/1245151/[/URL]
Ruddy is one of Our Lord and Saviors Jewish neighbors in Miami.
Ruddy is a billionaire and Owner of Newsmax, walking around Caracas, ID like to see the military escort lolololololol.
If I could get visa ID be in Caracas right now.
-
Post election analysis from NYT
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3051184]Was there an uncharacteristically large surge in black male votes for Trump in PA, MI and WI? Because those were the states whose Electoral College appointments gave the presidency to Trump in 2024. There was no surge of any typically Dem demographic voters that flipped a Blue state's EC appointments to Trump. Since that didn't happen, where are you getting that a move in Black, Latino or any other typically Dem demographic vote from Harris to Trump won him a single decisive EC appointment?
In the only 3 swing states that mattered, PA, MI and WI, there is plenty of evidence that the targeting of the Muslim Community in those 3 states and swinging just enough of those potential votes from Harris to Trump, less than a single percentage point swing among them, is the sole reason the USA now has to pay higher prices for groceries, there have been massive private-sector jobs layoffs, private-sector jobs creation has been practically non existent for over a year, Trillions and Trillions have been added to Trump's deficits with nothing to show for it and on and on.
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/02/swing-state-muslim-leaders-biden-00129758[/URL]
[URL]https://www.dailysabah.com/world/americas/us-muslims-drive-trumps-win-sparking-debate-among-pundits[/URL]
[URL]https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2024/11/08/muslim-voters-in-battle-ground-states-boosted-donald-trump-to-victory/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-earns-endorsement-highly-respected-muslim-leaders-battleground-state[/URL]
And this was a major deciding factor in their tiny handful of swing votes from Harris to Trump that "gave Trump the presidency"; Netanyahu simply delayed honoring the Biden-negotiated May 2024 ceasefire agreement until after the election:
[URL]https://www.trtworld.com/article/18254320[/URL]
An Always Welcome Bonus Video:
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR4yoQ-EXd8/?igsh=bXEydzY1a3EwZ3Jn[/URL][/QUOTE]The erosion of the Democratic base is accelerating.
Black voters have been — and still are — the most reliable Democratic voters. But in his three presidential campaigns, Mr. Trump made serious inroads in heavily Black counties, across the Deep South and beyond.
Those incursions predated 2024: More counties with a majority of Black voters shifted toward the Republicans in each of the last three elections than the total number of counties nationwide that trended toward Democrats.
Democrats increased their share of the vote in all three elections in only two majority-Black counties in the entire country, Rockdale and Douglas, both outside Atlanta in Georgia, a hotly contested battleground state.
Percentage of Black population, by county.
Shifted left three times.
Shifted right three times.
80%.
70.
60.
Rockdale.
County.
50.
Counties.
In Georgia.
40.
30.
20.
10.
Note: Circle size indicates county population.
Measuring electoral performance by race using countywide results is imprecise; voters of any race could play a role in a partisan shift. But all signs point toward the same conclusion, including the fact that Mr. Trump's support continued to grow in each of the six most predominantly Black counties in the country.
In last year's election, Republicans gained ground in 193 of the country's 200 most predominantly Black counties — even as former Vice President Kamala Harris stood to become the first Black female president.
The slippage is even more pronounced and profound in Latino communities.
Percentage of Hispanic population, by county.
Shifted left three times.
Shifted right.
90%.
Counties.
In Texas.
80.
70.
60.
50.
No counties with a Hispanic.
Population of more than.
30 percent shifted to the left.
40.
30.
20.
10.
Note: Circle size indicates county population.
Of the 67 counties in America with a majority Hispanic population, 66 voted more Republican in 2024 than in 2012.
Even more arresting is that the average swing toward the G. O. P. In those 66 Hispanic-majority counties was 23 percentage points — a political earthquake with which both parties are still coming to terms.
Mr. Trump improved his results in each of his three presidential runs in about two-thirds of majority-Hispanic counties.
Democrats, by contrast, steadily improved their share of the vote in not a single county in America where Latinos account for a third or more of the population.
The DNC is clearly the party of Anti American Feminists, Trannies and all those from Asia that hate America from birth even if they were shit out here.
There was an aphorism going around after the election, seems everyone hates Trump except Blacks Whites and Hispanics (Jews Muslims and Hispanics are Caucasians).
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3051315]The erosion of the Democratic base is accelerating.
Black voters have been and still are the most reliable Democratic voters. But in his three presidential campaigns, Mr. Trump made serious inroads in heavily Black counties, across the Deep South and beyond.
Those incursions predated 2024: More counties with a majority of Black voters shifted toward the Republicans in each of the last three elections than the total number of counties nationwide that trended toward Democrats.
Democrats increased their share of the vote in all three elections in only two majority-Black counties in the entire country, Rockdale and Douglas, both outside Atlanta in Georgia, a hotly contested battleground state.
Percentage of Black population, by county.
Shifted left three times.
Shifted right three times.
80%..[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFsmLTS360s[/URL]
-
2 photos
Well, again
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3051315]The erosion of the Democratic base is accelerating.
Black voters have been and still are the most reliable Democratic voters. But in his three presidential campaigns, Mr. Trump made serious inroads in heavily Black counties, across the Deep South and beyond.
Those incursions predated 2024: More counties with a majority of Black voters shifted toward the Republicans in each of the last three elections than the total number of counties nationwide that trended toward Democrats.
Democrats increased their share of the vote in all three elections in only two majority-Black counties in the entire country, Rockdale and Douglas, both outside Atlanta in Georgia, a hotly contested battleground state.
Percentage of Black population, by county.
Shifted left three times.
Shifted right three times.
80%.
70.
60.
Rockdale.
County.
50.
Counties.
In Georgia.
40.
30.
20.
10.
Note: Circle size indicates county population...[/QUOTE]Again, I see zero assertion and zero link for when, where, how and which typically Blue State flipped from Harris to Trump due to an "erosion" of Black, Latino or any other usual Dem voters that gave Trump so much as a single decisive or winning Electoral College appointment to give him the presidency and launch into his 2nd disastrous term of wiping out private-sector jobs while skyrocketing his deficits.
None.
Only one typically Dem voting demographic in the only 3 swing states that mattered and where that demographic was specifically targeted on a single issue with Netanyahu in more control over that issue than anyone else on the planet produced the deciding Electoral College appointments to give Trump the presidency in 2024 and launch into his destruction of America and the American economy.
You have provided zero assertion or link to support any other conclusion.
Right down there with zero quotes or links for me "bashing Muslims. ".
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DR4yoQ-EXd8/?igsh=bXEydzY1a3EwZ3Jn[/URL]
-
2 photos
Oops. Your link guy missed it.
Maybe your link guy was distracted by Trump's racist cartoon.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3051359][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFsmLTS360s[/URL][/QUOTE][B]Black Americans, stand up for immigrants. ICE is terrorizing our communities, too.
If there ever was a time for solidarity, the time is now. The end of due process for immigrants is the end of due process for everyone.[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2025/11/15/ice-us-citizens-black-americans-chicago-south-side/87210498007/[/URL]
[QUOTE]When I read headlines about Immigration and Customs Enforcement and National Guard deployments in Chicago, Los Angeles, Washington, DC, and now possibly Charlotte, North Carolina, and New Orleans childhood trauma resurfaces. As a Black, first-generation citizen born in the United States, who grew up in an overpoliced immigrant community, I feel echoes of painful memories.
I lived in a mixed-immigration status household in East Flatbush, Brooklyn, a melting pot of Caribbean ethnicities including St. Lucian, Jamaican, Haitian, Dominican and Guyanese. I was always struck by how normal the militarization of our neighborhood seemed to some locals, even though it was anything but. When I visited Manhattan or somewhere more racially diverse, I noticed people there didnt face constant police checkpoints, frequent stops or fear of armed officers conditions proven to traumatize those repeatedly exposed to them.[/QUOTE]
-
Thanks Anyways?
[QUOTE=BennieBen;3050926][URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_generating_stations_in_Quebec[/URL]
I never said they was building one by day, my point was that Dam arent like people think they are, they are not all single huge concrete wall who can be blowed with 1 explosion to shut down the electricity all over america in a single shot. So trying to produce it localy with coal for some knid of safety issue is bullshit, expensive and poisonning the air.
USA is sit next to a state who would happily sell enough clean energy for all the usa needs and all of this in canadian pesos. But american are so dumb and they are totaly mesmerized by their billionaire oligarch verbal diarrhea.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the explanation, Bennie!
But I'm afraid, the more you explain, the more convoluted and befuddling it becomes.
Thanks anyways!
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3051224][URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/chris-ruddy-rob-schmitt-trump/2026/02/06/id/1245151/[/URL]
Ruddy is one of Our Lord and Saviors Jewish neighbors in Miami.
Ruddy is a billionaire and Owner of Newsmax, walking around Caracas, ID like to see the military escort lolololololol.
If I could get visa ID be in Caracas right now.[/QUOTE]If you are going to Caracas for women, you will likely be disappointed. Venezuela is home of all these Miss Universes and Jim Rogers, who did a world tour, went to Caracas on his worldwide tour and said something to the effect that it was not what he expected. I went after he did and I will tell you it is a flat up disappointment. In fact, I would have said the Venezuelan women were overrated if not for the stunning Venezuelans I have met abroad.
Colombian and Venezuelan women are in the same gene pool, and that is the reason Colombia has been so accepting of Venezuelans. What I have learned about the culture is the best women are held very closely by their families and the brothers / parents are very protective of these women.
American women have gotten so pathetic that if you do not have a kid, a mental illness, huge debt, a drug problem, or are obese, you are in the top 1% of all women even if you are a plain jane looks wise. In contrast, my gal's daughter and her friends would be in the top 0.1% of all American women because most are in shape and attractive, and they are all virgins. You might ask how I know, but I can tell you how tightly the parents are in control of their kids. The issue is when these women go to university and are out of the homes that many go nuts with men.
On the flip side if you are going to buy land, that is a no-brainer. I kicked myself for not buying land / a house in Buenos Aires after that country's economy collapsed. The region in Buenos Aires where all the embassies is goes by the name Palermo, and it is the last place any new administration is going to steal land from. So buying land / a house around the USA embassy in Caracas now is a great idea. The prices in BA tripled in like five years.
Thing is Caracas is a hot as fuck shithole. Yeah, there are a few nice parts, but you have to drive through the slums on the way to and from the airport and maybe traffic is better now that so many people have left the country but the road to the city would often get backed up in the slum area. You are a sitting duck there for any armed punk.
The area I am looking at is LOS Roques. [URL]https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=%22los[/URL]+roques+venezuela%22.
Everybody outside of Venezuela thinks the best beaches are on Margarita Island but in Venezuela everyone mentions LOS Roques. I am not sure there are better beaches in South America or anywhere really and in the Southern Caribbean hurricanes are much less of a problem than areas like the Gulf coast.
I have not been to the city of Merida but that is where I would go if I were looking for women. It is in the mountains and cooler and is home to some of the best universities in the country.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3051783]If you are going to Caracas for women, you will likely be disappointed. Venezuela is home of all these Miss Universes and Jim Rogers, who did a world tour, went to Caracas on his worldwide tour and said something to the effect that it was not what he expected. I went after he did and I will tell you it is a flat up disappointment. In fact, I would have said the Venezuelan women were overrated if not for the stunning Venezuelans I have met abroad.
Colombian and Venezuelan women are in the same gene pool, and that is the reason Colombia has been so accepting of Venezuelans. What I have learned about the culture is the best women are held very closely by their families and the brothers / parents are very protective of these women.
American women have gotten so pathetic that if you do not have a kid, a mental illness, huge debt, a drug problem, or are obese, you are in the top 1% of all women even if you are a plain jane looks wise. In contrast, my gal's daughter and her friends would be in the top 0.1% of all American women because most are in shape and attractive, and they are all virgins. You might ask how I know, but I can tell you how tightly the parents are in control of their kids. The issue is when these women go to university and are out of the homes that many go nuts with men.
On the flip side if you are going to buy land, that is a no-brainer. I kicked myself for not buying land / a house in Buenos Aires after that country's economy collapsed. The region in Buenos Aires where all the embassies is goes by the name Palermo, and it is the last place any new administration is going to steal land from. So buying land / a house around the USA embassy in Caracas now is a great idea. The prices in BA tripled in like five years..[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2026/02/08/today-is-the-day-fans-of-pro-trump-nicki-minaj-announce-move-to-republican-party/[/URL]
I wouldn't visit for pussy I think the scene is still too unstable for that, I want to visit some people I know and I want to explore early.
Before ISGs flood it like Colombia SEA et al.
Maracay is supposed to be a nice military town.
I wish I was brave enough buy a place near the beaches in Aragua, but not unlike the Oil execs.
The Chavistas have a terrible track record of taking things that don't belong to them.
I haven't been there yet, but I don't agree with your comment about the gene pool.
My apologies if your GF is Colombian but Colombian chicas are not attractive to me.
Either their body is whacked or their face is or both.
I like a very thin and very pretty with smaller breasts.
Kinda like Veronica Rodriguez the Porn Star, I met her at a Porn Convention, she wanted to cum to my room for $$ and was texting and calling me later that day.
But I wasn't interested in her price.
I can give you an example, the women in Poland are pretty ugly, walk around Germany and you will probably never see an Ugly woman (ethnically German) I never have.
My theory is men with the most money breed with the best looking women money can buy, that affects the gene pool.
I'm pretty sure this is the case with Venezuela and Colombia.
And Japan and South Korea the Korean face is whacked.
-
3 photos
Biden would win today
There are several polling services showing more Americans and likely voters ranking Bidenomics higher than Trumpanomics. But none is no doubt more hurtful to poor baby Trump than his and his MAGA Repubs' favorite polling service, Rasmussen. And its head polster grudgingly admits that Biden would trounce Trump again if another election were held today:
[B]Trump Friendly Pollster Stuns With Survey Comparing Biden And Trumps Job Performance.
Feb. 11, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-friendly-pollster-stuns-survey-204752162.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]According to a Rasmussen survey released on Tuesday, 56% of likely U.S. voters disapprove of Trumps performance thus far in the White House. The numbers got worse from there, especially when his performance was compared to that of former President Joe Biden.
When asked who did a better job as president, 48% answered with Biden and 40% answered Trump. Another 8% say they have performed about the same. The survey was conducted between February 2-4 among more than 1,000 likely voters. It carries a margin of error of 3%.
...........
Rasmussen Reports head pollster Mark Mitchell argued that while he would likely not agree with voters who would choose Biden over Trump today, the numbers are undeniable.
"If an election were held TODAY between Trump and Biden, Biden would win, he wrote on Tuesday on X. There are a million valid arguments you can make that explain why thats retarded, and I would agree with most of them. But that doesnt change the fact Biden would win.[/QUOTE]BTW, that poll was conducted BEFORE the January 2026 BLS Jobs Report was released showing a revised net LOSS of 1000 jobs for the entire 2nd half of 2025 after Trump enacted his "Liberation From Your Job" Day tariffs along with the 130,000 jobs created last month being dwarfed by the 230,000+ average per month we had under Biden, along with the 256,000 created in December 2024, a 4. 1% Unemployment Rate and a 2.9% inflation rate at the handoff.
Oh, and while we're at it, might as well mention 2024 already saw a decades' long low rate of violent and property crime under Biden after both had spiked up to decades' long highs rates in 2020 under Trump.
-
Solidarity? I'm all for all Americans to stand united
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3051409]Maybe your link guy was distracted by Trump's racist cartoon.
[B]Black Americans, stand up for immigrants. ICE is terrorizing our communities, too.
If there ever was a time for solidarity, the time is now. The end of due process for immigrants is the end of due process for everyone.[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2025/11/15/ice-us-citizens-black-americans-chicago-south-side/87210498007/[/URL][/QUOTE]Against Vile Libertarians like Chas Koch Thomas Massie and Rand Paul.
And the likes of posters like you, FUCK Asia in all of its filthy disgusting holes!!
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/opinion/foreign-countries-bear-the-burden-of-tariffs-86794b27[/URL]
Post Script: and fuck Canada the EU and Mexico as well!
-
3 photos
But, never fear, Trumpanomics has been great for China! As expected.
A Rasmussen Poll of Xi and the Chinese Communist Party would almost certainly show an overwhelming preference for Trump and Trumpanomics over Biden and Bidenomics.
[B]A year into Trump tariffs, Chinese factories and ports are buzzing with activity.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/12/trump-tariffs-cny-chinese-factories-and-ports-are-buzzing-with-activity.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Factories and ports appear as busy as ever ahead of the Lunar New Year pre-holiday rush.
Major ports in China saw a surge in containers activity, pushing up freight prices.
For shipments to the U.S., large containers were running above levels during the same period in 2024 and 2025 for most part of January and into February.[/QUOTE][B]China's trade surplus hit record $1.2 trillion in 2025.[/B]
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chinas-trade-surplus-hit-record-073006417.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]Last year's bruising trade war between Washington and Beijing -- which at one point saw reciprocal tariffs in the triple digits -- led to a 20 percent plunge year-on-year in China's exports to the United States, with imports falling 14.6 percent.
But other trade partners more than filled the gap, increasing Chinese exports overall by 5.5 percent in 2025, while imports stayed flat in dollar terms.[/QUOTE]MAGA Repubs and your facilitating relatively tiny handful of angry Muslims in the only 3 swing states that mattered and gave Trump the presidency in 2024, Xi and China thanks you very, very much for your vote.
-
3 photos
But wait! There's more!
Yep, we've got typically crap Repub jobs creation numbers, typically crap Repub high business bankruptcy numbers, typically crap Repub high private-sector jobs layoffs numbers, typically crap Repub broad USA Stock Market gains vs the previous Dem gains, etc, etc, etc and now typically crap Repub lower opportunities to achieve The American Dream.
Gee, who could have predicted such a thing? I mean, other than everyone who could have and did vote for Kamala Harris.
[B]Realtors report a 'new housing crisis' as January home sales tank more than 8%[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/12/january-homes-sales.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Sales of previously owned homes in January dropped a wider-than-expected 8.4% from December.
The median price for a home sold in January was $396,800, up 0.9% year over year and [b]the highest January price on record.[/b]
Inventory came down from December but was still up 3.4% year over year.[/QUOTE]Hmm. I wonder if 5 years of zero American iInfrastructure Week "anything" under Trump out of the past 9 years of him playing golf, golf and more golf while putting Russia Russia Russia and China First had anything to do with this all new Repub Housing Crisis.
Oh well. We tried.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: LCOE of S+W+BAT vs Fossil Fuels and 'baseload' mythology
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054]Hot damn, an energy discussion! [/QUOTE]LOL! Dude get over yourself and don't be so freakin' conceited, energy debates and discussions have been going on here, for the last several months at least!
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054]For the bigger picture, ignoring weather events, by focusing just on LCOE, he ignores a lot of costs. For example, the cost of transmission build-out, new and upgraded substations, etc.[/QUOTE]Again, [NOPARSE]just freakin' hubris! As if a weather storms, downed powerlines, transmission outages and new grid transition costs don't also exist for fossil fuel power plants.
Also an LCOE is what is. Until the financial energy industry uses something else, quit y'all belly-aching! Ya don't see me belly-aching about an LCOE, that does not take into account the massive fossil fuels cradle to grave inefficiencies of 50% to 70%, when used to [/NOPARSE]generate electricity.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054] He fails to consider that storage for wind and solar is expensive. And extremely expensive more than 6 hours out. ... BAHAHAHAHAHA![/QUOTE]So instead of flapping your gums and laughing [I](like an old maid windbag spinster),[/I] perhaps you should just try providing the evidence, with regards to your claims of fossil fuels (or nuclear), today having a lower LCOE than [I]solar/wind + battery storage.[/I] At best, the only fossil fuel, is gas-CCGT (the most efficient use of gas to generate electricity) and is only slightly lower or [I]on par with and LCOE for S+W+B.[/I] Yes, while solar and wind remain the lowest LCOE, even with storage many cases, worldwide.
[QUOTE=PVMagazineUSA]Lazard’s analysis of levelized cost of electricity across fuel types finds that new-build utility-scale solar, even without subsidy, [b]is less costly than new build natural gas, and competes with already-operating gas plant.[/b] ... On an unsubsidized $/MWh basis, renewable energy remains the most cost-competitive form of generation. ... both the lowest-cost and quickest-to-deploy generation resource.”[/QUOTE][B]Solar cost of electricity beats lowest-cost fossil fuel – even without tax credits,[/B], July 1st, 2025 [URL]https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2025/07/01/solar-cost-of-electricity-beats-lowest-cost-fossil-fuel-even-without-tax-credits/[/URL]
[U]The "baseload" grid of yesteryear, is not your electricity grid future of tomorrow:[/U]
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054] And doesn't appear to understand that you must have natural gas, coal, and/or nuclear plants for reliable baseload power, unless you live someplace like Quebec or New Zealand.[/QUOTE]I think AEMO CEO, Daniel Westerman said it best, when referring not only to the Australia's grid for the future, but what he thinks the grids of the world will transition to and become:[LIST][i]"Australia’s operational paradigm is no longer ‘baseload-and-peaking’, but increasingly it’s a paradigm of ‘renewables-and-firming". It’s a crucial point to understand."
"[b] 'Baseload' is not so much a technical virtue as a business model[/b] – the people who invest in coal generators, and nuclear in particular, count on those machines operating at or near full capacity most of the time." [/i][/LIST]I couldn't agree more with that profound statement, from the AEMO CEO, as he calls out fossil fuel "baseload", [B]NOT a "technical virtue",[/B] but rather the case of a [B]"business virtue",[/B] of the fossil fuel overlords.
And let's not get it twisted [I]...in a renewables future grid of tomorrow,[/I] as clean green renewable tech gets better and more robust, fossil fuels may still play role, just less and less of a role, as time marches on.
I think, many of the energy sources powering the renewables grid around the world of tomorrow, will be dynamically digitally [I]software/firmware engineered[/I] to operate in complement to provide continual power demand (that also simulates any traditional "baseload" as needed and are NOT necessarily required to generate electricity 24/7, on their own.
-
Crazy senile Trump, after being a danger for our world, now wants to kill our planet, same than China. He doesn't care about future, when he will die soon, but killing our children. This guy is really a shame for so many points. USA compete with China to kill our planet.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3051224][URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/chris-ruddy-rob-schmitt-trump/2026/02/06/id/1245151/[/URL]
Ruddy is one of Our Lord and Saviors Jewish neighbors in Miami.
Ruddy is a billionaire and Owner of Newsmax, walking around Caracas, ID like to see the military escort lolololololol.
If I could get visa ID be in Caracas right now.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.newsmax.com/world/globaltalk/donald-trump-christopher-ruddy-munich/2026/02/12/id/1245975/[/URL]
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: One of the most exciting 2025 breakthroughs is RUST?
Iron-air (or Rust) batteries, companies like Ore Energy (EU) and Form Energy (US), with their [B]extremely low cost ($6/kw) 100-hour (4-days) battery systems,[/B] represent a pivotal breakthrough for long-duration energy storage (LDES) coupled with solar and wind, that are emerging as a cost-effective complementary, supplemental and / or alternative, beyond the 4 to 8 hour fast delivery of lithium-ion battery storage.
Form Energy, With manufacturing and commercial successes, early deployments of their Iron-Air batteries, are now underway with utility companies like Great River Energy, Xcel Energy and Georgia Power in Minnesota, Colorado and Georgia, respectively.
[B]Iron-Air Batteries: Transforming Renewable Energy Storage, December 3rd, 2025.[/B] [URL]https://energydigital.com/news/iron-air-batteries-transforming-renewable-energy-storage[/URL].
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054]He fails to consider that storage for wind and solar is expensive. And extremely expensive more than 6 hours out. Please note on an average day with good weather you can only get meaningful solar generation for about 4 to 6 hours. For wind the average is 6 to 10 hours a day.[/QUOTE]Once again, what the many champions of dirty fossil fuels, don't seem to realize, is that the many breakthroughs in clean energy tech, coming from companies like Ore Energy, Form Energy and Rondo Energy (heat batteries), is that clean tech areas like [I][b]the global battery storage sector[/b][/I], are solving our most challenging and difficult to abate energy and grid problems, at break-neck speeds.
Is 2026, the Year of the Battery?
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3052074][URL]https://www.newsmax.com/world/globaltalk/donald-trump-christopher-ruddy-munich/2026/02/12/id/1245975/[/URL][/QUOTE]First, let's be frank about what is happening in the world — and why Trump's presidency continues to matter unlike any other.
And why his critics feel compelled to create a phony health crisis rather than debate his record.
Donald Trump is doing well in national polling, buoyed by strong approval among his base and solid support among likely voters.
Despite relentless attacks from much of the mainstream press, his numbers have remained resilient.
I recently reviewed a McLaughlin poll that asked voters whether President Trump is truly putting "America First" as a priority. An astonishing 65% said yes.
That's a seismic admission by such a majority.
Even many voters who may not agree with every decision concede — deep down — that he is putting the country's interests first.
And the results of those policies are tangible.
On the home front, recent GDP figures have shown robust growth, with third-quarter numbers in 2025 reaching 4.3%.
Compared to the final full quarter of the Biden administration, that represented a 79% increase in the growth rate.
On foreign policy, the Trump administration has moved aggressively and unapologetically.
Working with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the president has pushed forward diplomatic efforts in regions long considered intractable.
Agreements or ceasefires have been reached involving India and Pakistan, Armenia and Azerbaijan, and Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
The Gaza hostage standoff was brought to an end after intense negotiations.
NATO allies have committed to dramatically increasing defense spending, with a 5% benchmark no one thought possible.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3051842]I haven't been there yet, but I don't agree with your comment about the gene pool.[/QUOTE]Well, you need to buff up on your history then. The reason Ecuador, Venezuela, and Colombia all have red, yellow, and blue flags is they were all a part of the same country for a while.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3051842]Either their body is whacked or their face is or both.
I like a very thin and very pretty with smaller breasts.
Kinda like Veronica Rodriguez the Porn Star, I met her at a Porn Convention, she wanted to cum to my room for $$ and was texting and calling me later that day.[/QUOTE]There are plenty of women like Rodriguez in Colombia. Shakira is thin with small boobs. Thing is the women who look like that are more European (AKA whiter), and they have more well to do and protective parents, and you are not gong to see many in hooker venues. In Venezuela, the only people with money are the thieves in government or people bringing in it from abroad.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3051842]My apologies if your GF is Colombian but Colombian chicas are not attractive to me. My theory is men with the most money breed with the best looking women money can buy, that affects the gene pool.[/QUOTE]Now you sound like JJbee. First off, you are imagining that all men want looks first and everytrhing else second. Next, my gal was not the most attractive woman I met in Colombia. She was #2. #1 was a materialistic, self absorbed gold digger. I was shocked #1 was not awful in bed.
Your comment is not well thought out. If Veronica Rodriguez is your ideal woman, would you introduce her to your parents? Would you want to have children with her? What would your friends say if you said this is my GF? You do not distinguish between a woman who is a trophy fuck and a mother to be.
As for why my woman is different, I will make it easy. A hooker will blow you for money. A sugar baby will blow you, care about giving you a good BJ because she likes you, but she will still expect to get paid. A wife will blow you doing a courtship phase and maybe for six months to a year and then she will stop. She will say your dick tastes funny; she has a headache, or shame you for wanting sex. And when a wife pulls the power move of refusing sex, her sisters applaud her for standing up to her man.
Things are so fucked up we have feminists who say a man can rape his wife. Not only does a wife have to consent to sex even that is not enough. Women can say that regretting sex is rape, and male desire has been demonized. I have had to tell many a woman if your daddy was not a horny bastard, you would not be alive so STFU about demonizing male sex drive.
A hooker and sugar baby know if they do not provide for a man's sexual needs, they are out. And yet wives think they can withhold sex and their man is not going to leave them or cheat? How fucked up is that that people have lower expectations from wives than they do from sugar babies or mistresses?
So my criteria for monogamy was you have to show more desire than the hooker or sugar baby and stay attractive to me. So while your comparing your trophy fuck to my women, would Veronica Rodriguez be thrilled to suck your dick and not expect to be compensated? You already said you were arguing about price. Well, then she is a totally different animal than my woman.
How many married men do you know whose women have quit giving them BJs when they want? I would be hard pressed to name one that does not have that issue. Well, there is the kids. She had a headache: blah, blah, blah. How hard is it to give a blow job? Even with my SBs, over time, they would be less interested in sexually pleasing me and when that happened, I would get rid of them.
And to the married men who do not want to divorce their wives over sexual frigidity by choice, I would say why the fuck would you not get rid of them? If your wife is not even willing to put in the effort to give you a BJ, then why should you put any effort into her? Men have become such wimps. Stop feeling ashamed of having a sex drive. If men did not have that, we would all not exist.
The problem with this forum and mongers is they are conditioned to think there is just money for sex. For me to be monogamous, I have to feel like it is not quid pro quid with a hooker, and the woman better project to the world that she loves to suck my dick. It is on you to show the world that we do not have a john-hooker relationship and it has not come up with us despite the difference in age and beauty.
It is incredibly fucked up that I had to go to a third world country to find a woman to service the most basic of male needs, but I did. Worse than that, MDS, you do not even think that such a woman exists. So yeah, I get it. On here, I am just this bullshit artist. In my real life, my friends are thrilled that someone is in a happy relationship. It gives them hope that there are women like men that actually exist.
Better yet, she has set a different standard for other women. When we were on a vacation with another couple, they were fighting. Even my gal who is not that fluent picked up on it, but we were talking to the wife, and I told her that my gal and I have not had a fight, and she got defensive and said, "Well, we have not either" and right then and there, she shaped up, and their fighting stopped.
I have had so many guys say that they could never be with one woman, and I thought that too, but I know now the problem is not me. The reason I could not be faithful to one women is the pool of women out there sucks ass.
-
3 photos
Newsmax Wingers' unsubstantiated opinions are cute, but
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3052358]First, let's be frank about what is happening in the world and why Trump's presidency continues to matter unlike any other.
And why his critics feel compelled to create a phony health crisis rather than debate his record.
Donald Trump is doing well in national polling, buoyed by strong approval among his base and solid support among likely voters.
Despite relentless attacks from much of the mainstream press, his numbers have remained resilient.
I recently reviewed a McLaughlin poll that asked voters whether President Trump is truly putting "America First" as a priority. An astonishing 65% said yes.
That's a seismic admission by such a majority.
Even many voters who may not agree with every decision concede deep down that he is putting the country's interests first.
And the results of those policies are tangible..[/QUOTE]AI scanned the universe of reports, data and evidence to arrive at this overview to the question:
[B]Why did panels of non-partisan historians rank Trump the Worst President in U.S. History?[/B]
[QUOTE]Panels of non-partisan historians, political scientists, and presidential expertsmost notably in the Presidential Greatness Project Expert Survey (2018, 2021, 2024) and the C-SPAN Presidential Historians Survey (2021)have consistently ranked Donald Trump at or near the bottom of U.S. presidents.
These rankings are based on an average of ratings across various leadership categories. Experts argue that his presidency was "singular" in its departure from established institutional norms and that he caused significant harm to democratic institutions.
Here are the primary reasons cited for the low rankings:
1. Undermining Democratic Norms and Institutions
Historians heavily weigh a president's respect for the Constitution and the peaceful transfer of power.
2020 Election and Jan. 6: Trump's attempts to overturn the 2020 election results, culminating in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, are frequently cited as a primary reason for the last-place ranking. This is seen as a direct attack on the democratic process.
Distrust of Institutions: Experts point to his rhetoric against the judiciary, the intelligence community, and the electoral system, arguing this weakened public trust in foundational American institutions.
2. "Worst" Rankings in Moral Authority and Administration
In surveys that break down leadership into categories, Trump consistently received the lowest scores in:
Moral Authority: Critics pointed to his rhetoric, personal conduct, and divisive language, arguing he failed to unify the country or adhere to the dignity of the office.
Administrative Skills: Experts often cited high turnover rates within his cabinet, chaotic decision-making processes, and a disregard for established policy-making protocols.
3. Two Impeachments
Trump is the only president in U.S. history to be impeached twice (2019 and 2021). While he was acquitted by the Senate both times, historians see the House chargesabuse of power/obstruction of Congress, and incitement of insurrectionas significant marks against his leadership.
4. Handling of Major Crises
COVID-19 Pandemic: Many historians viewed his administration's response to the COVID-19 pandemic as lacking in scientific guidance, chaotic in its federal response, and damaging to public trust, leading to unnecessary loss of life.
Foreign Policy and Alliances: His "America First" approach led to strained relationships with traditional allies (NATO) and a withdrawal from international agreements, which critics argued diminished American influence globally.
5. Partisan and Regulatory Behavior.[/QUOTE]Most of those assessments were before the disastrous Tariffs and economic policies of his 2nd term added Trillions and Trillions to his deficits in order to "buy" the worst jobs creation record for any non Great Repub Depression or Great Repub Recession year, numbering a total of 181,000 new jobs. No, not per month. For the entire year of 2025!
And the weakest S&P 500 Index performance of any first year of a new presidential. Administration ever. Trump's favorite measure of economic success or failure.
And his trade wars with China once again further enriching China while impoverishing American farmers and manufacturers.
And his bombing and starting wars in several countries as well as threatening in invade and go to war with several allies including Canada, Mexico and Greenland.
And his sending masked and armed marauders into some of America's biggest and most important cities to hassle, harass, shoot and kill law-abiding American citizens.
And his Secretary of HHS bringing measles and polio back to the country.
And his taking extraordinary measures to protect and defend not the USA Constitution but pedos and kiddie sex traffickers.
And so on.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3052037]LOL! Dude get over yourself and don't be so freakin' conceited, energy debates and discussions have been going on here, for the last several months at least!
Also an LCOE is what is. Until the financial energy industry uses something else, quit y'all belly-aching! Ya don't see me belly-aching about an LCOE, that does not take into account the massive fossil fuels cradle to grave inefficiencies of 50% to 70%, when used to generate electricity.[/QUOTE]LOL. Tell me Spidy if alternative energy is so damned great, why are electricity prices higher in places like California and Europe who are shoving alternative energy up everyone else's nose? Tell me, oh wise one, why is LCOE better than what is on people's damned electric bill?
[QUOTE=Spidy;3052037]Solar cost of electricity beats lowest-cost fossil fuel even without tax credits, July 1st, 2025[/QUOTE]LOL. If solar were cheaper, why do guys like you have to keep beating your chests about it? People will do it on their own.
Here is a real life example. I have solar panels on the RV, and they charge the RV's battery. Last night, there was a rain storm, and the battery that powers the generator runs off of solar power but there was not enough sun yesterday to charge it. My generator runs off gasoline in the main tank, and the generator would not start. I had to turn on the truck engine which charged the battery to turn on the generator. So the solar I do have failed.
I have bought 12,000 watts of batteries to run a second AC unit for the summer. I have not had them installed because it is not hot enough yet, and I am up in the air to use added solar to charge them or not, but these batteries are crazy heavy, 300 pounds for all of them, so I bought a smaller one, a 2000 watt than I can carry. I use A / see in my home to charge up the battery and it is at 100%.
This battery had one function, to keep a space heater running for the night. Temp outside is 50 degrees. You know how long it lasted? Four fucking hours! And now the 2000 watt battery won't charge. It has been sitting in the RV for weeks as dead weight. I have not had the RV that long, and it has been fail, fail, fail with solar and batteries.
You know what has not failed? The generator that runs off of the gasoline tank in the RV. It has worked perfectly. You know what also has not failed? The heater that runs off of propane. So when the damned 2000 watt battery failed, I turned on the generator and ran the propane heater and all was well.
And you are going off of this crap about transmission lines, transformers, and grid stability, when the reality is, the alternative power is not reliable in my fucking RV! Every time I have given alternative energy a chance, it has sucked ass.
And the other part that cracks me up is that the first time I charged the battery, it was A / c power which is 60% fossil fuels. And this is what cracks me up, how many of these solar plants have batteries that are really charged by the sun and how many of these batteries are being charged by fossil fuels like mine were?
The entire basis for the alternative energy nonsense to begin with was "saving the planet" right? Oceans were going to rise and swallow us whole. Then we found out all the elites putting this horseshit had condos on the coast. I remember reading AlGore saying the combustion energy would lead man into extinction while flying everyone on a private jet!
And now the elites and their experts took their latest tumble with the Epstein release.
-
Non partisan historian wtf? That's beyond Stoopid even from you
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3052391]AI scanned the universe of reports, data and evidence to arrive at this overview to the question:
[B]Why did panels of non-partisan historians rank Trump the Worst President in U.S. History?[/B]
Most of those assessments were before the disastrous Tariffs and economic policies of his 2nd term added Trillions and Trillions to his deficits in order to "buy" the worst jobs creation record for any non Great Repub Depression or Great Repub Recession year, numbering a total of 181,000 new jobs. No, not per month. For the entire year of 2025!
And the weakest S&P 500 Index performance of any first year of a new presidential. Administration ever. Trump's favorite measure of economic success or failure.
And his trade wars with China once again further enriching China while impoverishing American farmers and manufacturers..[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/hillary-clinton-breaks-party-line-calls-mass-migration-destabilizing[/URL]
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/how-deep-deep-state[/URL]
The Deep state aka the puppets of the oligarchs.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3052358]First, let's be frank about what is happening in the world and why Trump's presidency continues to matter unlike any other.
And why his critics feel compelled to create a phony health crisis rather than debate his record.
Donald Trump is doing well in national polling, buoyed by strong approval among his base and solid support among likely voters.
Despite relentless attacks from much of the mainstream press, his numbers have remained resilient.
I recently reviewed a McLaughlin poll that asked voters whether President Trump is truly putting "America First" as a priority. An astonishing 65% said yes.
That's a seismic admission by such a majority..[/QUOTE]Full failure, despite DT and swallowing Putin, for Ukraine. Greenland hate USA. Tourists boycott USA. But yes, crazy senile too old Trump kill citizens, not even Black now, with ICE. Democracy falling like jobs under Trump. Only inflation increasing. I think our world, when USA are only 5%, look forward he dies, like Putin and Netanyahou, for a better world.
-
Siri you should type much less and read much more
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3052545]Full failure, despite DT and swallowing Putin, for Ukraine. Greenland hate USA. Tourists boycott USA. But yes, crazy senile too old Trump kill citizens, not even Black now, with ICE. Democracy falling like jobs under Trump. Only inflation increasing. I think our world, when USA are only 5%, look forward he dies, like Putin and Netanyahou, for a better world.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/munich-2007-day-west-was-told-no[/URL]
-
Let us guess you're a big fan
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3052391]AI scanned the universe of reports, data and evidence to arrive at this overview to the question:
[B]Why did panels of non-partisan historians rank Trump the Worst President in U.S. History?[/B]
Most of those assessments were before the disastrous Tariffs and economic policies of his 2nd term added Trillions and Trillions to his deficits in order to "buy" the worst jobs creation record for any non Great Repub Depression or Great Repub Recession year, numbering a total of 181,000 new jobs. No, not per month. For the entire year of 2025!
And the weakest S&P 500 Index performance of any first year of a new presidential. Administration ever. Trump's favorite measure of economic success or failure.
And his trade wars with China once again further enriching China while impoverishing American farmers and manufacturers.
And his bombing and starting wars in several countries as well as threatening in invade and go to war with several allies including Canada, Mexico and Greenland.
And his sending masked and armed marauders into some of America's biggest and most important cities to hassle, harass, shoot and kill law-abiding American citizens.
And his Secretary of HHS bringing measles and polio back to the country.
And his taking extraordinary measures to protect and defend not the USA Constitution but pedos and kiddie sex traffickers.
And so on.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/cooke-what-eileen-gu-is-doing-is-adjacent-to-treason/[/URL]
-
4 photos
Of course. Why not?
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3052697][URL]https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/cooke-what-eileen-gu-is-doing-is-adjacent-to-treason/[/URL][/QUOTE]I am a fan of anyone whose intentions are to honor their Oath of Office and to make America a better place to live, work and invest. Even a minor mistake in that endeavor is bound to produce better results than from those whose intentions are clearly to exploit the position for the exact opposite results or to only enrich themselves at the great expense of everyone else.
By definition the former would mean virtually anyone who runs for office as a Democrat while the latter would be practically anyone who runs for office as any other party member.
Obviously.
That is a pattern impossible to ignore since it has been that way for about 100 years so far.
-
Have you no shame
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3052779]I am a fan of anyone whose intentions are to honor their Oath of Office and to make America a better place to live, work and invest. Even a minor mistake in that endeavor is bound to produce better results than from those whose intentions are clearly to exploit the position for the exact opposite results or to only enrich themselves at the great expense of everyone else.
By definition the former would mean virtually anyone who runs for office as a Democrat while the latter would be practically anyone who runs for office as any other party member.
Obviously.
That is a pattern impossible to ignore since it has been that way for about 100 years so far.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/17/opinion/trump-coalition-multiracial-working-class.html[/URL]
In other words, Democrats' underlying problems with Black and Latino voters are very similar to their problems with the electorate in general: a continued wariness toward a party that cannot yet be trusted to do what's in the interest of the nation as a whole.
-
World War 3 is here! Hold on to your pants!
This is it guys. World War 3 is going to happen in the next 2 to 3 days. This guy on the internets youtubes says so. So it must be true.
And I for one is looking forward to it. *sigh* I was going to go to the dentist next month though cause I really want to go back to Thailand.
I was really hoping to visit Thailand one last time before armageddon, but I guess it's no go. Shucks.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ny2oCmH5OI[/URL]
I was really looking forward to starting my youtube channel about Thailand. But since we'll all be wiped out by nuclear annihilation, there's not much point now.
-
3 photos
Racist "winning", LOL!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3051409] Maybe your link guy was distracted by Trump's racist cartoon.
Black Americans, stand up for immigrants. ICE is terrorizing our communities, too.
If there ever was a time for solidarity, the time is now. The end of due process for immigrants is the end of due process for everyone.
[url]https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2025/11/15/ice-us-citizens-black-americans-chicago-south-side/87210498007/[/url][/QUOTE]It is amazing how the gullible MAGA nation, that post here, don't realize this very simple foundational freedom of rights, as they dumbfoundedly post about "WINNING", as if having your rights trampled on, is "WINNING"!
[B]Trump Suffers Record Low Polling on Key MAGA Policy, February 18th, 2025[/B], [I]"President Donald Trumps approval rating on a key MAGA policy has dropped to a new low as he delivers on a central campaign promise.
Only 38 percent of Americans think Trump is doing a good job on immigration, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll."[/I] [URL]https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-suffers-record-low-polling-on-key-maga-policy/[/URL].
-
3 photos
What does poor little rich RV solar, have to do with the real world issues?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3052524]LOL. Tell me Spidy if alternative energy is so damned great, why are electricity prices higher in places like California and Europe who are shoving alternative energy up everyone else's nose? [/QUOTE]Dude, [NOPARSE]one has nothing to do with the other! So stop asking unrelated questions w/r to LCOE, that you know nothing about. As you're ONLY embarrassing [/NOPARSE]yourself!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3052524]Here is a real life example. I have solar panels on the RV, and they charge the RV's battery. ... And the other part that cracks me up is that the first time I charged the battery, it was A / c power which is 60% fossil fuels. [/QUOTE]LOL! [NOPARSE]Elvis 2008, is bitching about his first world RV "rooftop solar" problems,...meanwhile the poorest of the poor, in places like Pakistan (in Emerging Markets), are taking out loans, dipping into personal savings and selling their precious items, like their prized gold pieces, to buy solar panels, to solve [/NOPARSE] [B]actual real world[/B] problems, like powering their homes with rooftop solar, or irrigating their corps with DIY-mobile solar panels, instead of expensively fueled dirty non-renewable diesel generators.
So forgive me, if I find the hubris of your RV dilemma, as nothing more than gibberish, if this is what passes for a debate, on world energy issues, facing our planet, in MAGA circles.
[B]P.S.[/B] Oh BTW, it just so happens, that maybe, the Pakistani farmer's portable mobile accordion solar panel irrigation solution, may just have something in common with your RV dilemma?
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3052664][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/munich-2007-day-west-was-told-no[/URL][/QUOTE]And USD falling, more than inflation and losing jobs, or risk to be killed by ICE supported by crazy Trump for crimes. MAGA is really falling. Shoot in head, not ears.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3053008]Dude, one has nothing to do with the other! So stop asking unrelated questions w/r to LCOE, that you know nothing about. As you're ONLY embarrassing yourself![/QUOTE]I can see why Tiny quit responding to you. You just stated the price of a good has nothing to do with its cost. Sadly, I have no doubt that is something being taught at Ivy League universities.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3053008]Elvis 2008, is bitching about his first world RV "rooftop solar" problems,...meanwhile the poorest of the poor, in places like Pakistan (in Emerging Markets), are taking out loans, dipping into personal savings and selling their precious items, like their prized gold pieces, to buy solar panels, to solve actual real world problems, like powering their homes with rooftop solar, or irrigating their corps with DIY-mobile solar panels, instead of expensively fueled dirty non-renewable diesel generators.P.S. Oh BTW, it just so happens, that maybe, the Pakistani farmer's portable mobile accordion solar panel irrigation solution, may just have something in common with your RV dilemma?[/QUOTE]I was bitching because the solar panels and battery falied while the fossil fuels did not. I don't get your analogy. I said my solar and battery failed. I understand the plan of the Pakistani farmer but you failed to mention whether their solar panels were reliable or did the panels fail when they were most needed like with everyone else.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3053008]So forgive me, if I find the hubris of your RV dilemma, as nothing more than gibberish, if this is what passes for a debate, on world energy issues, facing our planet, in MAGA circles.[/QUOTE]If cost of a good has nothing to do with price, WTF does? And I am glad you think that reliablitity of energy supply is not important. Yes, the dude in Brazil somehow invokes MAGA and Trump as to why energy supply reliability is not an issue.
And your moronic labels just took a hit, Spidy. Bill Maher just apologized to Q'Anon. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYY9_88UXvY[/URL].
I must have missed your apology. Can you link to it?
And in that same video, another one of your moronic labels took a hit. Yeah, that would be pizzagate. Apparently, the guy who debunked Pizzagate was arrested for raping toddlers. That is at the 6:40 mark in the video.
It seems to me that whenever you engage in your moronic labels they come back to bite you in the ass, and those scars are there even if you try to deny they do not exist.
-
2 photos
But but but. WTF?
Welp. There goes our Two Weeks TACO Trump Tariffs refund checks!
[B]U.S. trade deficit totaled $901 billion in 2025, barely budging despite Trump tariffs[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/19/us-trade-deficit-totaled-901-billion-in-2025-despite-trumps-tariffs.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]For the full year, the U.S. ran a $901.5 billion trade deficit, down slightly from 2024 but only by 0.2%, or $2.1 billion.
The report follows a year in which President Donald Trump implemented a series of aggressive tariffs aimed at leveling the global playing field.[/QUOTE]He conned dumb Repub hillbilly MAGAs into believing China, Brasil, etc would somehow in some magical way pay the Import Taxes he raised on the goods Americans want or need to buy. That didn't happen, of course. So then he conned them into believing their paying those higher prices was reducing the trade deficit "the likes of which nobody has ever seen", so much that we were all going to get big fat refund checks from all that sweet foreign money "flowing into" America any minute now.
Now it turns out all those higher prices Americans have been paying for almost everything they want or need has not even lowered the trade deficit enough for everyone to get a refund check equal to the 24 cents difference per gallon of regular gas that has occurred over the past year and was clearly heading for under Biden during 2024 anyway.
Oh well. We tried.
-
2 photos
To Recap:
The Rate of Inflation under Biden at the end of 2024 was 2. 9%. Under Trump at the end of 2025 it was 3%.
GDP Growth for all of 2024 under Biden was 2. 4%. For all of 2025 under Trump it was 2. 2%.
The Unemployment Rate at the January 2025 handoff to Trump was 4. 0%. Today, under Trump it is 4. 3%.
2. 2 - 2. 5 Million new jobs were created in 2024 under Biden.
181,000 new jobs created in 2025 under Trump.
For all the added and increased costs the American Consumers had to pay for products they wanted or needed thanks to Trump's Tariffs, the USA Trade Deficit barely budged in 2025.
However, China's Trade SURPLUS hit an all-time historic record high after Trump handed China so many of the American farmers' and manufacturers' international customers during his 2nd classic epic fail Trump "deal" that always puts America Last and our Adversaries First.
Now the American Working Men and Women, not China, are on the hook to refund $175 Billion to the importers who were forced to pay Trump's Unconstitutional Tariffs.
Still, MAGAs thank that relatively tiny handful of angry Muslims spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered for their vote shift from the Dem nominee to the Repub nominee in 2024, which gave Trump the presidency and is therefore solely responsible for the pathetic economic results cited above.
It should no longer be a mystery to anyone why a majority or clear plurality of poll respondents told HarvardCAPS / Harris, YouGov / Economist and Rasmussen they thought Joe Biden performed better as President than Donald Trump.
Oh well. We tried.
[B]Fourth-quarter U.S. GDP up just 1.4%, badly missing estimate; inflation firms at 3%[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/20/pce-inflation-december-2025.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[URL]https://www.instagram.com/reel/DU9vPTvkQ7b/?igsh=MTExdmczeHJ4ZHBvMA==[/URL]
1 down. 3 more to go.
-
When hot damn, doesn't mean hot damn and it's all hot air?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054]Hot damn, an energy discussion! [/QUOTE]Crickets! LOL!
WTF! What happened to that so called "energy debate", you were [B]"hot damning"[/B] about? What, all talk and no action?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3053060]I can see why Tiny quit responding to you. [/QUOTE]When did Elvis 2008, become the MAGA mouth piece for Tiny 12? The dude, Tiny 12, supposedly, doesn't even like the MAGA Fuhrer? LOL!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3053060]You just stated the price of a good has nothing to do with its cost. [/QUOTE]BTW, your dumbass LCOE question, is like saying, [I]"...because I brought brand new inexpensively priced ICE car, then auto-magically, the price I pay gasoline is going to be low"...LOL![/I] (ie. One has nothing to do with the other!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3053060]I was bitching because the solar panels and battery falied while the fossil fuels did not. I don't get your analogy. I said my solar and battery failed. I understand the plan of the Pakistani farmer but you failed to mention whether their solar panels were reliable or did the panels fail when they were most needed like with everyone else.[/QUOTE]Why am I not surprised you don't get the analogy?
Dude, the Pakistani farmers and people have been bitching about, how the a high price and expensive fossil fueled grid and generator diesel fuel, have been failing them, where solar and batteries have solved their problems. The exact opposite of your RV first world problems, which YOU can't solve, [B]given all the available resources in a first world country, at your disposal.[/B] It almost borders on pathetic!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3053263]When did Elvis 2008, become the MAGA mouth piece for Tiny 12? The dude, Tiny 12, supposedly, doesn't even like the MAGA Fuhrer? LOL![/QUOTE]Man, you really are a follower. You cannot even talk energy without discussing presidential politics.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3053263]BTW, your dumbass LCOE question. The exact opposite of your RV first world problems, which YOU can't solve.[/QUOTE]Yawn. I ask you a question and you do not answer it. Then you go back on the attack again. The reason alternative energy is not reliable is I am a dumb ass. All that is important is your screwed up head is the Democrats are right and if Harris, who is so stupid, would be president everything would be great.
Why am I not surprised you don't get the analogy?
[QUOTE=Spidy;3053263]Dude, the Pakistani farmers and people have been bitching about, how the a high price and expensive fossil fueled grid and generator diesel fuel, have been failing them, where solar and batteries have solved their problems.[/QUOTE]Yeah, you would see it that way. Here are alternative points of view to your rosy picture. Pakistan's power grid threatened by growing adoption of Chinese solar panels, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjCLYOIr-UE[/URL]
Why Pakistan's Solar Revolution Backfired, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O2JrsEoZTM&t=62s[/URL]
What dumb ass response will you come up to these videos? I will go with the never mind approach where you deem it is not worthy of your time. Or maybe you will take it on and weave into the Fuhrer, MAGA, QAnon, Epstein horseshit. I am not sure what those have to do with Pakistani energy or my RV batteries not working as they should, but I am confident you can find it way to work it in.
-
ID for literally everything but to cast a fraudulent vote
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3053092]Welp. There goes our Two Weeks TACO Trump Tariffs refund checks!
[B]U.S. trade deficit totaled $901 billion in 2025, barely budging despite Trump tariffs[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/19/us-trade-deficit-totaled-901-billion-in-2025-despite-trumps-tariffs.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
He conned dumb Repub hillbilly MAGAs into believing China, Brasil, etc would somehow in some magical way pay the Import Taxes he raised on the goods Americans want or need to buy. That didn't happen, of course. So then he conned them into believing their paying those higher prices was reducing the trade deficit "the likes of which nobody has ever seen", so much that we were all going to get big fat refund checks from all that sweet foreign money "flowing into" America any minute now.
Now it turns out all those higher prices Americans have been paying for almost everything they want or need has not even lowered the trade deficit enough for everyone to get a refund check equal to the 24 cents difference per gallon of regular gas that has occurred over the past year and was clearly heading for under Biden during 2024 anyway.
Oh well. We tried.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.newsmax.com/us/mamdani-shoveling-snow-volunteers/2026/02/22/id/1247031/[/URL]
-
3 photos
Uh
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3053566][URL]https://www.newsmax.com/us/mamdani-shoveling-snow-volunteers/2026/02/22/id/1247031/[/URL][/QUOTE]I assume the Identification asked for is to make sure their paycheck is made out to the person doing the job.
Identifications for alcohol, gun purchases, etc are meant to prove WHO the person is or HOW OLD the person is, nothing to do with proving where they were born, their citizenship or even the exact date and place of birth as the Voter Identification cultists are always demanding.
That latter form of Identification, as in a passport or a notarized and certified birth certificate, is simply not something millions and millions of American Citizens have on hand. And since it costs money to purchase one, renew a passport or to have a birth certificate notarized or certified, it amounts to a "poll tax" one must pay in order to vote.
Which is illegal.
-
Ruby Red states implore more Wind as energy solutions over fossil fuels
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054]Hot damn, an energy discussion![/QUOTE][I]Hot Damn...LOL![/I]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3053362] The reason alternative energy is not reliable is I am a dumb ass. All that is important is your screwed up head is the Democrats are right and if Harris, who is so stupid, would be president everything would be great. [/QUOTE]In the 58% clean wind energy state of South Dakota, regulators just approved a 3/4 billion dollar, 333-megawatt wind farm, and will be the largest in the state, spread across approximately 110 square miles of private land.
[B]South Dakota (SD)regulators approve wind farm that will be the largest in the state,[/B] February 13,2026. [URL]https://southdakotasearchlight.com/briefs/south-dakota-regulators-approve-wind-farm-that-will-be-the-largest-in-the-state/[/URL]
So despite [B]the pedo sympathizer president's loud mouth,[/B] mad king MAGA sucker politics, and opposition to "money-losing" wind farms, the economic and business math on the ground, is proving to be stronger and more profitable, than all the dumbass MAGA windmill rhetoric and tells a very different energy success story, even in ruby red MAGA Repub states, like SD, Iowa, Kansas and Texas.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3053231]The Rate of Inflation under Biden at the end of 2024 was 2. 9%. Under Trump at the end of 2025 it was 3%.
GDP Growth for all of 2024 under Biden was 2. 4%. For all of 2025 under Trump it was 2. 2%.
The Unemployment Rate at the January 2025 handoff to Trump was 4. 0%. Today, under Trump it is 4. 3%.
2. 2 - 2. 5 Million new jobs were created in 2024 under Biden.
181,000 new jobs created in 2025 under Trump.
For all the added and increased costs the American Consumers had to pay for products they wanted or needed thanks to Trump's Tariffs, the USA Trade Deficit barely budged in 2025.
However, China's Trade SURPLUS hit an all-time historic record high after Trump handed China so many of the American farmers' and manufacturers' international customers during his 2nd classic epic fail Trump "deal" that always puts America Last and our Adversaries First.
Now the American Working Men and Women, not China, are on the hook to refund $175 Billion to the importers who were forced to pay Trump's Unconstitutional Tariffs..[/QUOTE]When Trump is 80 yo, but making money for himself, same than when he started and not paying tax, but Americans pay now for his tax from his craziness, when justice and court keep on cancelling his from senility decisions. He is too old and turning crazy since years, like for Capitol. Lost jobs, inflation, USD fall and bad image for Americans, really bad MAGA, but more MANGA, make America not great again, under crazy Trump.
-
Electrostate vs Petrostate: A solar revolution gives back, the power to the people
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3053362]Yeah, you would see it that way. Here are alternative points of view to your rosy picture. Pakistan's power grid threatened by growing adoption of Chinese solar panels, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjCLYOIr-UE[/URL]
Why Pakistan's Solar Revolution Backfired, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O2JrsEoZTM&t=62s[/URL][/QUOTE]Instead of just posting random videos out of your ass, why don't you properly explain, how exactly this solar revolution has backfired on Pakistanis, when they have been marred in a culmination of three decades of ill-conceived policies, corruption, and a lack of long-term planning, that has resulted in a perfect storm of policy failures, soaring electricity prices, blackouts and bad contracts? [URL]https://thediplomat.com/2024/08/pakistans-power-crisis-a-perfect-storm-of-policy-failures/[/URL].
What you obviously don't understand, is that the prevailing and antithetical view on the Pakistani Solar Revolution, is that Chinese solar panels has pulled millions of Pakistanis out of electricity poverty and has enhanced the national grid's reliability. [B]Pakistans Solar Revolution Is Bringing Power to the People,[/B] June 25th, 2025 [URL]https://e360.yale.edu/features/pakistan-solar-boom[/URL].
No doubt your idiotic MAGA fossil fuel ideology, would want the Pakistanis go back to blackouts, power grid failures and highly expensive power bills? While dismissing the decades of mismanagement of gas / LNG contracts, by gov't and utility firms, are the very issues, that have been the cause of poor and failing grid.
[QUOTE][b]Pakistans Energy Betrayal: Decades Of Mismanaged Contracts Cast Shadow On Nation.[/b] September 27, 2025
"Take-or-pay contracts were accepted, sovereign guarantees were surrendered, and arbitration clauses were shipped to London. They called it reform, they called it modernisation, they called it progress. In reality, they signed chains around the state. Three decades later, those chains weigh heavier than ever, [b]with nearly every year billions flowing to Independent Power Producers (IPPs), feeding the monster of circular debt. What was meant to illuminate Pakistan has instead cast a shadow across generations.[/b]"
...
"The tragedy grows bitterer when we recall the slogans of salvation. Foreign-qualified champions of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and coal-fired projects arrived, promising that imported fuels would change the fate of Pakistan."
[url]https://thefridaytimes.com/27-Sep-2025/pakistan-s-energy-betrayal-decades-mismanaged-contracts-cast-shadow-nation[/url][/QUOTE]The only people that the Pakistan solar revolution has backfired on, is the power utility companies and their bad contracts. I can't wait to see the Pakistanis, now move to more personal and community battery storage and keep the electricity they generate.
-
Trump Derangement Syndrome
Trump Derangement Syndrome is real, but probably not what you think. If you've ever been publicly critical of Donald Trump, you've probably been accused of "Trump Derangement Syndrome" by his followers. But what if that phrase actually reveals more about the movement using it than the people it's aimed at? A peer-reviewed study by Franks and Hesami (2021) set out to test this exact claim: that critics of Trump suffer from an irrational hostility that prevents objective thinking, "TDS". Across multiple experiments, the researchers examined whether political bias toward Trump is symmetrical, meaning, whether both supporters and critics distort information in similar ways. Their findings suggest otherwise.
Trump's detractors did not show consistent patterns of reflexive opposition. In fact, they tended to evaluate statements more independently of Trump's involvement. By contrast, Trump supporters were significantly more likely to shift their views depending on whether they believed Trump held a particular position, even when that position contradicted their previous beliefs. In one experiment, participants adjusted their stance on voting procedures depending on whether the outcome favored Trump, revealing a willingness to reinterpret even democratic norms in light of loyalty. Yes, supporters would cheat in elections to get Trump back in office.
In other words, the evidence does not support the idea that critics are uniquely "deranged". Instead, it points to an asymmetry of loyalty in supporters, where allegiance to the leader can outweigh consistency, evidence, and even previously held convictions. That should give us pause. Because "Trump Derangement Syndrome" is real, but not in the way it's commonly used. It's not primarily about people who are too critical. It's about a system that trains people to dismiss critique altogether when it threatens loyalty. When disagreement is labeled as derangement, you no longer have to engage the argument. You can ignore the evidence. You can protect the narrative.
Think of how we are watching this play out in real time. Donald Trump has been convicted on 34 felony counts in New York, and independent fact-checking organizations have documented tens of thousands of false or misleading claims during his public life. He has also been found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in civil court, and his name appears thousands of times in the Epstein Files, even after heavy redactions by his DOJ. Yet allegiance among his core supporters has remained remarkably stable. And once that pattern takes hold, real derangement sets in. Truth is no longer something we test and evaluate in light of evidence. It becomes something we defend for our side.
Facts are no longer evaluated on their merits; they are filtered through identity. If it helps our team, it's true enough. If it challenges us, it must be biased, corrupt, or fake. At that point, you're no longer arguing about ideas. You're protecting a distorted reality. That's why fact-checking so often fails. It assumes people are asking, "Is this true"? But in many cases, the deeper question has already been decided: "Is this loyal"? And when loyalty becomes the standard, truth becomes negotiable. This is the real derangement. And it is dangerous. Trump's followers would tear up and trample upon the Constitution if they felt that was the loyal thing to do. Their loyalty is to Trump no matter what. And not the law of the land.
-
No TDS study needed, but much appreciated!
[QUOTE=TheCane;3053628]Trump Derangement Syndrome is real ... actually reveals more about the movement using it than the people it's aimed at? A peer-reviewed study by Franks and Hesami (2021) set out to test this exact claim: that critics of Trump suffer from an irrational hostility that prevents objective thinking, "TDS".
... It's not primarily about people who are too critical. It's about a system that trains people to dismiss critique altogether when it threatens loyalty. [b]When disagreement is labeled as derangement, you no longer have to engage the argument. [/b]You can ignore the evidence. You can protect the narrative. ... [/QUOTE]Thanks a ton, for the brilliant Franks and Hesami [I]"clinical" TDS analysis,[/I] on what looks to be a pretty good and comprehensive study! This is much appreciated!
Put simply though, it backs up what many of us here at ISG, refer to as, [I][b]"gullible MAGA suckers".[/b] No study needed...LOL![/I]
-
Let us guess you love this dogturd
[QUOTE=TheCane;3053628]Trump Derangement Syndrome is real, but probably not what you think. If you've ever been publicly critical of Donald Trump, you've probably been accused of "Trump Derangement Syndrome" by his followers. But what if that phrase actually reveals more about the movement using it than the people it's aimed at? A peer-reviewed study by Franks and Hesami (2021) set out to test this exact claim: that critics of Trump suffer from an irrational hostility that prevents objective thinking, "TDS". Across multiple experiments, the researchers examined whether political bias toward Trump is symmetrical, meaning, whether both supporters and critics distort information in similar ways. Their findings suggest otherwise.
Trump's detractors did not show consistent patterns of reflexive opposition. In fact, they tended to evaluate statements more independently of Trump's involvement. By contrast, Trump supporters were significantly more likely to shift their views depending on whether they believed Trump held a particular position, even when that position contradicted their previous beliefs. In one experiment, participants adjusted their stance on voting procedures depending on whether the outcome favored Trump, revealing a willingness to reinterpret even democratic norms in light of loyalty. Yes, supporters would cheat in elections to get Trump back in office..[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/newsom-says-hes-blacks-because-he-cant-read-and-got-low-sat-score[/URL]
-
Almost there folks, should I still do my taxes?
Armageddon was supposed to happen over the weekend, instead it was just snow. But I'm still looking forward to World War 3.
When nukes?
I'm going to wait until I do my taxes, cause imagine all that pain in the ass paper processing for taxes and we all get mercifully vaporized by nukes. But I really want to book my flight to Thailand though.
This is tough. Why spend the money on flights when the world is going to end soon?
Can't really decide now. Imagine the egg on my face if I don't book the flights and the world doesn't end?
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;3053628]Trump Derangement Syndrome is real, but probably not what you think. If you've ever been publicly critical of Donald Trump, you've probably been accused of "Trump Derangement Syndrome" by his followers. But what if that phrase actually reveals more about the movement using it than the people it's aimed at? A peer-reviewed study by Franks and Hesami (2021) set out to test this exact claim: that critics of Trump suffer from an irrational hostility that prevents objective thinking, "TDS". Across multiple experiments, the researchers examined whether political bias toward Trump is symmetrical, meaning, whether both supporters and critics distort information in similar ways. Their findings suggest otherwise.
Trump's detractors did not show consistent patterns of reflexive opposition. In fact, they tended to evaluate statements more independently of Trump's involvement. By contrast, Trump supporters were significantly more likely to shift their views depending on whether they believed Trump held a particular position, even when that position contradicted their previous beliefs. In one experiment, participants adjusted their stance on voting procedures depending on whether the outcome favored Trump, revealing a willingness to reinterpret even democratic norms in light of loyalty. Yes, supporters would cheat in elections to get Trump back in office..[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/08/28/landmark-study-suggests-most-psychology-studies-dont-yield-reproducible-results[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3053738]Armageddon was supposed to happen over the weekend, instead it was just snow. But I'm still looking forward to World War 3.
When nukes?
I'm going to wait until I do my taxes, cause imagine all that pain in the ass paper processing for taxes and we all get mercifully vaporized by nukes. But I really want to book my flight to Thailand though.
This is tough. Why spend the money on flights when the world is going to end soon?
Can't really decide now. Imagine the egg on my face if I don't book the flights and the world doesn't end?[/QUOTE]You should have slept outside in street on East coast, when you look so much forward to die. Or do like the one who tried to enter Trump castle.
-
SCOTUS strikes down the MAGA Fuhrer's global tariffs!
The MAGA Fuhrer, rails against SCOTUS's decision to strike down the tariffs, and frames the decision as something of [B]a "disloyal" act.[/B] he called the three (3) SCOTUS that voted against his argument, as, [I]"...fools and lapdogs for the RINOs and the 'radical' left Democrats...very unpatriotic and disloyal our Constitution."[/I].
[B]Supreme Court strikes down Trumps sweeping tariffs, sparking fierce pushback and vow of new levies,[/B] February 22,2026 [URL]https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-tariffs-trump-0485fcda30a7310501123e4931dba3f9[/URL].
This rambling, bumbling speech (as am sure the SOTU speech will be), addresses the narcissist pedo sympathizer president, who was again claiming [I][b]"loyalty above all"[/b] (as if were Game of Thrones)[/I] despite 2/3 of SCOTUS ruled against his dumbass tariffs according the Constitution.
[QUOTE=TheCane;3053628] "In other words, the evidence does not support the idea that critics are uniquely "deranged". [b]Instead, it points to an asymmetry of loyalty in supporters, where allegiance to the leader can outweigh consistency, evidence, and even previously held convictions. [/b]That should give us pause. Because "Trump Derangement Syndrome" is real, but not in the way it's commonly used."[/QUOTE]Yes, TDS (but not in the way you imagine), once again proving that, the peer-reviewed study by Franks and Hesami (2021), is very much correct in it's analysis, that MAGA Nation in their decision making, behavior and twisted beliefs are [I][b]based on some fake sense of "MAGA loyalty"[/b][/I] and [U]NOT on the Rule of Law, Constitutional Law, or any principal of law, human rights, equality or decency. [/U]
-
Tell them cornel
[QUOTE=FFlintstone69;3053732][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/newsom-says-hes-blacks-because-he-cant-read-and-got-low-sat-score[/URL][/QUOTE][URL]https://www.latintimes.com/political-activist-cornel-west-accuses-governor-newsom-reinforcing-core-pillars-white-supremacy-595013[/URL]
-
Ok ok. This is it, I'm sure of it
Everybody's saying that we're just one or 2 days away from WW3 folks, so just keep your panties on. I'm on a Korean horror movie kick right now, have basically watched them all, and I'm almost ready to book my flight to Thailand. But with the end of the world just around the corner, should I still fly? Hmmmm.
God, there's still so much sexual stuff I want to do. I've never had 3 girls at once. I've yet to experience 2 chicks giving me a blowjob at once. Fucking a hijab babe. But life is misery anyway, might as well finally die.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;3053628]A peer-reviewed study by Franks and Hesami (2021) set out to test this exact claim: that critics of Trump suffer from an irrational hostility that prevents objective thinking, "TDS". Across multiple experiments, the researchers examined whether political bias toward Trump is symmetrical, meaning, whether both supporters and critics distort information in similar ways. Their findings suggest otherwise.[/QUOTE]Amazing that the actual study was not linked. Well, here you go. [URL]https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/11/3/113[/URL]
The scientific method is to make a hypothesis, gather data, and see if the hypothesis fits the data. The irony is you already lost me with the title of the study: Seeking Evidence of The MAGA Cult and Trump Derangement Syndrome.
You have just lost me with the title in that your assumption is anyone who votes for Trump is in a cult. As for the evidence of a cult there is this, "It's no longer a political party. It's a cult. " -Former Republican Representative Mickey Edwards on leaving the Republican Party (January 2021). Wow! Well, that sure is scientific.
And how many people were polled in this study? Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk (mTurk) system and limiting enrollment in the study to "Master Workers" in the United States, 394 participants (Mage = 34.95, SD = 13.56) were recruited and paid USD 0. 50 for completing the study.
Oh, well, that is good. And let me guess, these so called scientists even found a way to reject results they didn't like: Accordingly, data collection was halted shortly afterward, with some additional leeway for the possibility of some participants failing attention checks.
Cane, the fact that you would believe such a stupid and poorly denied study shows how badly your TDS is. Thing that kills me is any other grouping like women, blacks, hispanics, or overweight people and you would be screaming from the rooftops about racism, sexism, or fat shaming. But if it is a group of Trump voters, it is okay. That shows that you suffer from TDS.
[QUOTE=TheCane;3053628] Donald Trump has been convicted on 34 felony counts in New York[/QUOTE]It was the same count listed 34 times that was beyond the statue of limitations and was used to influence an election. It was the state of New York and its jurors going way out of their lane to try to choose who should be president for the rest of us and in a case where the head of the FEC was not allowed to testify. The two star witnesses were a felon, who would say anything for personal gain, and a porn star who owes Trump close to a million dollars.
And your take is the 77 millions people who voted for Trump do not have any respect for the law? LOL. No, those 77 million Americans had no respect for the law you TDS Democrats made up and used to try to convict him.
If this whole fiasco was not political, please tell me why Trump is not in jail? If he was a real criminal who could personally do harm to his fellow citizen, he should have been put in jail. Instead, all you dumb Dems do is say he is a convicted felon to try to score political points.
But if you have not noticed, SCOTUS, which is dominated by Republicans, actually did say Trump went too far with his tariffs. In principle, I liked Trump's tariffs, but he employed them like a spoiled Hollywood actress.
He is also pushing the outer edges with his foreign policy. After killing the head of the Jalisco Cartel and seizing Maduro, the latest Trump escapade involves taking out a string of mullahs in Iran. What happened to America first?
I also do not like the switch in gears whenever the news is somewhat negative. After a few bad headlines, DOGE was put to the sideline as was all the Somali fraud in Minnesota. It is like he threw up his hands and said "I am more popular when I spend money so let's go back to that. ".
Despite all that, I do not regret my vote because the alternative was Kamala Harris, and you have TDS to the Nth degree if you think she would have been a better president than Trump, and this is after you fools put into office a guy with dementia and stage 4 prostate cancer.
I don't see many Dems saying you know we should have a fair primary process and see which candidate resonates with voters. You Dems have not had a fair primary process since 2012 IMO. Hell, this last primary season there was no hiding the candidate was picked by Democratic elites. And Kamala's entire campaing slogan may have been, "I am not Trump". Voting for Trump was not just voting for Trump. It was saying that citizens voting actually mattered. Thing about the Epstein files is we see how perverted the elites really are.
I and I have a feeling most of America is in the mood for some boring bureaucrat who gets the trains to run on time and gets us back to a time where performance and not personality wins the day.
Bill Maher showed sympathy for the Trump voter when he / she said voting for Trump was a vote against all the woke insanity that Maher hates so much. How about you guys nominate someone qualified and not crazy? You know like maybe not a guy with dementia or a hooker who sucks down wine by the gallon? Then we will not have to vote for a narcissist. If you have not noticed, Trump's support has been dropping like a stone. That is hardly the behavior of a cult.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3053730]Thanks a ton, for the brilliant Franks and Hesami [I]"clinical" TDS analysis,[/I] on what looks to be a pretty good and comprehensive study! This is much appreciated!
Put simply though, it backs up what many of us here at ISG, refer to as, [I][b]"gullible MAGA suckers".[/b] No study needed...LOL![/I][/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/02/25/schweizer-how-the-left-is-brainwashing-america-featuring-buck-sexton/[/URL]
Schweizer: How the Left Is Brainwashing America, Featuring Buck Sexton.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3053622]Instead of just posting random videos out of your ass...
What you obviously don't understand, is that the prevailing and antithetical view on the Pakistani Solar Revolution, is that Chinese solar panels has pulled millions of Pakistanis out of electricity poverty and has enhanced the national grid's reliability. https://e360.yale.edu/features/pakistan-solar-boom. No doubt your idiotic MAGA fossil fuel ideology, would want the Pakistanis go back to blackouts, power grid failures and highly expensive power bills[/QUOTE]Let's go back to what I say. I prefer what is going on in Texas. Use alternative energy when it is cost effective but understand its limitations. Do not push alternative energy up people's noses. Respect the fact that fossil fuels and nukes are more reliable than alternative energy and there is a 100 year infrastructure built up to support it.
Understand that places like Texas who have used common sense policy have much cheaper energy prices than the places like California and Europe who said if we did not stop using fossil fuels, the world as we know it would end. I asked you why if alternative energy was cheaper why do places who use more of it have more expensive energy costs, and you said the cost of production and energy prices had nothing to do with each other.
Then like the principleless dumb Dem you are, you go right back to how solar is cheaper and people are paying less for electricity in Pakistan which is totally wrong. Why you are so dumb is you did not even read your own fucking article, Amjad: Over the past year we've seen a 4 to 5 percent decrease in grid demand. As more people defect from the grid, the total costs are shared by a smaller number of consumers. So grid electricity gets more expensive, and more consumers leave.
That is the EXACT same point those "random" videos I posted made.
Yes, the rich people who can buy solar panels are doing great. They have gone away from state controlled electricity and generated power on their own which is cheaper for them. The poor people dependent on the grid are getting fucked. That is the opposite of what you said.
And you keep using the word state in what you want: petrostate, electrostate. The reality is that it was state involvement that made the Pakistani grid suck so badly. And as more people leave the grid, the less money it makes, and the less secure it will be, and the one thing everyone in the videos and your article states is that policies need to change as this problem is getting worse and worse.
But you keep droning on with your envirocult binary behavior: alternative energies good, fossil fuels bad.
And your dumb ass keeps going on about MAGA and fossil fuels. Everyone wants reliable energy, and you cannot get it through your thick skull that fossil fuels are more reliable than alternative energy. And if you were living on the East Coast of the USA being pelted with blizzard after blizzard versus living on a beach in Brazil or an apartment in Thailand, you would fucking get that.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3054064]... than the places like California and ...[/QUOTE]To be fair, we don't have high electricity prices because we are weak, sloppy Democratic hippies, it's because we allowed the monopoly power supplier (PG&E) to deregulate in 1997 and them bailed them out of two subsequent bankruptcies caused by their greed and incompetence, letting them pass their capital costs to the hapless ratepayers.
-
The MAGA Fuhrer's tariffs, are really just his personal golden goose
So rather than taking the "off ramp" to the historically bad decisions on tariffs (that SCOTUS nicely laid out for him), the arrogant con man, grifter, charlatan and pedo sympathizer MAGA president, decides to double-down with more tariffs.
But like I've said in the past, [B]...it's all a grift.[/B] The ONLY THING the MAGA Fuhrer is upset about, is the fact that he may no longer be able to receive a shit-ton of bribes, gifts and tributes from dignitaries, CEOs, billionaires or high profile business leaders, looking to coddle up to him and curry favor for tariff exemptions, carveouts [I]and/or[/I] special dispensations, like he once did.
So while the gullible MAGA suckers, will still stand behind his dumbass tariffs, despite the SCOTUS' ruling, they still don't get it. The fact remains, tariffs have always been, his personal pick-pocketing grift, golden goose and treasure chest.
The "tariff" grift, pick-pocket scheme and pilfering, from the American people, along with tributary bribes from dignitaries sucking-up, kowtowing and bending the knee, has ALWAYS been [I][b]his own sick fantasy of leverage over his perceived enemies and his own personal golden goose.[/b][/I]
-
The Magic of the Epstein Pedo Sex Files (EPSF)
The MAGA Menosphere is going ballastic over the Epstein cover up, as brand new alleged evidence of a pedo activity from an 2019 FBI interview is uncovered and said to be connected to the pedo sympathizer MAGA Fuhrer.
[B]Bombshell Epstein File Reveals FBI Interviewed Underage Trump Accuser,[/B] February. 17 2026. [B]Daily Beast:[/B] [I]"The FBI interviewed a Jeffrey Epstein victim who alleged that President Donald Trump sexually abused her when she was a teenager, documents from the Justice Department file dump revealed."[/I] [URL]https://www.thedailybeast.com/fbi-interviewed-underage-trump-accuser-bombshell-epstein-file-reveals/[/URL].
From outcast Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (aka. Pedo Prince Andy) arrested in the UK, to wannbe kings, as the Brit tabloid headlines read, [I]"Not even princes are above the law"[/I] and neither should corrupt unlawful kings.
Also Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayam resigned from DP World, the former Norwegian Prime Minister, charged with gross corruption, Peter Mandelson fired as ambassador and step-down from the House of Lords, Kathryn Ruemmuler step-down from Goldman Sachs and many other notable accountability around the world.
[U]Meanwhile back in the U.S.[/U]
[I]"Nothing to see here...", LOL! Looks like [b]DOJ "Bimbo"[/b] Bondi and [b]FBI "Crap" Patel,[/b] got some explaining to do!B]P.S.:[/B] Will an attack on Iran, be the key to diverting attention, from the newly alleged pedo MAGA president's accusations?
-
3 photos
Your post proves the opposite. Again.
Your post not only supports the conclusion that Trumpism / MAGA is a cult, but it also supports the conclusion that you are still a card-carrying, certified member in good standing of that cult.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3054062]You have just lost me with the title in that your assumption is anyone who votes for Trump is in a cult. As for the evidence of a cult there is this, "It's no longer a political party. It's a cult. " -Former Republican Representative Mickey Edwards on leaving the Republican Party (January 2021). Wow! Well, that sure is scientific.
Despite all that, I do not regret my vote because the alternative was Kamala Harris, and you have TDS to the Nth degree if you think she would have been a better president than Trump, and this is after you fools put into office a guy with dementia and stage 4 prostate cancer.
I don't see many Dems saying you know we should have a fair primary process and see which candidate resonates with voters. You Dems have not had a fair primary process since 2012 IMO. Hell, this last primary season there was no hiding the candidate was picked by Democratic elites. And Kamala's entire campaing slogan may have been, "I am not Trump". Voting for Trump was not just voting for Trump. It was saying that citizens voting actually mattered. Thing about the Epstein files is we see how perverted the elites really are.
I and I have a feeling most of America is in the mood for some boring bureaucrat who gets the trains to run on time and gets us back to a time where performance and not personality wins the day.
Bill Maher showed sympathy for the Trump voter when he / she said voting for Trump was a vote against all the woke insanity that Maher hates so much. How about you guys nominate someone qualified and not crazy? You know like maybe not a guy with dementia or a hooker who sucks down wine by the gallon? Then we will not have to vote for a narcissist. If you have not noticed, Trump's support has been dropping like a stone. That is hardly the behavior of a cult. [/QUOTE]You proudly parrot the Trumpism / MAGA Cult BS about Biden's mental state then or now, his medical diagnosis, Harris' supposed alcoholic incapacity, blah, blah, blah, contrary to all available evidence and easily observable reality that your Cult has been hanging onto like rats on a rafter to excuse or justify your disastrous and traitorous vote for The Worst President in USA History and despite all of the available evidence and data showing Biden's 1 term was better for America, its economy and National Security than any "best" month of the Trump so-called presidency the first time around and this time around.
Life-long Republican attorney and Trump appointee Robert Hur spent hours interviewing Biden in 2024 and did not find or report one iota of evidence that Joe Biden had dementia or any cognitive incapacity despite tremendous pressure from his side to do so or that he was incapable of making better informed, smarter and more effective Presidential decisions, the purpose of the job, than Trump ever made on any day of his life. And there has been no credible report or evidence presented that supports your BS about Kamala Harris not being more fit to be President than Trump ever was and certainly more than he is now.
That, Sir, is a Cult. And the fact that you can't admit you made a grave mistake in voting for Trump any of the times he ran for president based on the BS you have been fed by that Cult and its Dear Leader proves you are a member of that Cult committed to being willfully ignorant about what plenty of other Americans now realize was an election they sorely wish could be done over.
You're even hanging on to the Trumpism / MAGA Cult BS for why there was not an inter-Party primary battle over the nomination when Harris the only candidate that would have access to the millions and millions of Biden-Harris campaign dollar donations heading into the election. As though it was somehow undemocratic for the opposition to your beloved Trumpism / MAGA Cult candidate not to run a campaign with little or no money against your guy who hadn't been doing anything other than making the worst presidential decisions in USA History, playing golf and campaigning for re-election since 12:01 PM on January 20,2017.
And for all we know, none of the poll respondents in the several credible polling services who are now stating in the majority or a clear plurality that if the election were held again today they would vote for Joe Biden or Kamala Harris are supposedly "former" Trumpism / MAGA Cult members. They could very well simply include the millions of 2020 Biden voters who sat out the 2024 election because they were just fine with their financial situation thanks to the historic Biden-Harris recovery from the colossal mess of Trump's Pandemic and some who had been bamboozled by classic pro-Repub pretend "bothsider / neithersiders" into believing it really doesn't matter all that much who is president or which Party they identify with.
Man, they have really learned the folly of allowing themselves to be bamboozled into believing that catastrophic lie.
"Woke insanity"? LOL. More proof you are in the Cult. Bill Maher is a liar, devoted to helping Repubs win elections by any means necessary and by any razor-thin margin necessary since he provided that function in 2000 for GW Bush then again and again for Trump all three times he ran and squeaked out his two wins.
MAGA Bill Maher has never met a Democrat in any position to legislate or pass a law allowing children to choose a sex-change, never met one who thinks "men can get pregnant", never met one who wants to "defund the police" and on and on and on. But he campaigns for Repubs every week on his show to help the Bushes and the Trumps win elections on that premise as though it had ever happened, which it hasn't.
Only devoted Trumpism / MAGA Cult members believe and cite the lies MAGA Bill Maher tells on behalf of his beloved Repub Party every week.
-
Cult
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3054062]If you have not noticed, Trump's support has been dropping like a stone. That is hardly the behavior of a cult.[/QUOTE]Trump's core base (his "cult" of which you are a part) has consistently remained around 35% nationally. And in case you haven't noticed, his overall approval rating remains above that. So, his cult-like core remains with him. Of course you don't see it as a cult. That's because you're deep in it, constantly blinded by the Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) of which you and the rest of his sycophants sadly suffer. It's among the independents who he's been able to dupe twice that his support has really fallen. Scam an independent once, and that's on a Trumptard. But scam an independent twice, and that's on a stupid independent voter.
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/02/23/donald-trump-approval-rating/88176174007/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3054127]The MAGA Menosphere is going ballastic over the Epstein cover up, as brand new alleged evidence of a pedo activity from an 2019 FBI interview is uncovered and said to be connected to the pedo sympathizer MAGA Fuhrer.
[B]Bombshell Epstein File Reveals FBI Interviewed Underage Trump Accuser,[/B] February. 17 2026. [B]Daily Beast:[/B] [I]"The FBI interviewed a Jeffrey Epstein victim who alleged that President Donald Trump sexually abused her when she was a teenager, documents from the Justice Department file dump revealed."[/I] [URL]https://www.thedailybeast.com/fbi-interviewed-underage-trump-accuser-bombshell-epstein-file-reveals/[/URL].
From outcast Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (aka. Pedo Prince Andy) arrested in the UK, to wannbe kings, as the Brit tabloid headlines read, [I]"Not even princes are above the law"[/I] and neither should corrupt unlawful kings.
Also Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayam resigned from DP World, the former Norwegian Prime Minister, charged with gross corruption, Peter Mandelson fired as ambassador and step-down from the House of Lords, Kathryn Ruemmuler step-down from Goldman Sachs and many other notable accountability around the world.
[U]Meanwhile back in the U.S.[/U]
[I]"Nothing to see here...", LOL! Looks like [b]DOJ "Bimbo"[/b] Bondi and [b]FBI "Crap" Patel,[/b] got some explaining to do!B]P.S.:[/B] Will an attack on Iran, be the key to diverting attention, from the newly alleged pedo MAGA president's accusations?[/QUOTE]Having had business with pedocriminal Epstein don't mean to be a pedocriminal, but what about 4 women who complain Trump abused them when they were under majority? This would be pedocriminality? Isn't ICE investigating about this? Rather than killing.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054169]You proudly parrot the Trumpism / MAGA Cult BS about Biden's mental state then or now[/QUOTE]MAGA didn't drop Biden from the ticket. You dumb Dems did that on your own ignoring the will of your voters. This is classic TDS, blaming Trump when the only he did was kick Biden's ass during a debate.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054169]Harris' supposed alcoholic incapacity, blah, blah, blah, contrary to all available evidence[/QUOTE]Again, this is from your side. [URL]https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/obama-pelosi-did-not-want-harris-democratic-megadonor/[/URL]
LOL. Again, from your side, Democratic megadonor John Morgan joined "CUOMO" on Monday night to discuss the failed Harris-Walz campaign, claiming former President Barack Obama and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not want Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee to replace President Joe Biden.
Biden stepped down from the presidential race in July, amid pressure from high-ranking Democratic figures. He endorsed Harris no less than an hour later, while former President Obama took five days to endorse Harris on his X page.
"he did not want to go gently," Morgan said of Biden. "he nominated her, basically Obama did not want her. Obama did not endorse her for five days, Pelosi did not want her."
According to Morgan, Biden's endorsement of Harris was an "F you" to Obama and Pelosi.
"Pelosi told her California delegation, there will be a conference, there will be a caucus, there will be a convention," Morgan said, a point touched upon by many Republican politicians and commentators during the process. "We basically ran on this deal where 'democracy, democracy!' And then we didn't have democracy in picking our nominee. "
Morgan, who admitted he did not personally donate to Harris's campaign, criticized the way the campaign handled its funds, saying it could put her presidential future in doubt.
Morgan's critique comes amid multiple reports the Harris campaign is $20 million in debt after a lavish spending spree.
The megadonor claimed those alleged squandered campaign funds should permanently disqualify her from running for president again.
"The same thing is going to follow Harris for the rest of her career. She cannot be trusted with the money, and the donors are going to be, like, 'Where is this money? He said.
And let me guess your cult like answer Tooms. You are going to blast this guy Morgan like you do Bill Maher. Yeah, anyone who criticizes the Democratic party is a bothsider to you because you are in a cult.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054169]Life-long Republican attorney and Trump appointee Robert Hur spent hours interviewing Biden in 2024 and did not find or report one iota of evidence that Joe Biden had dementia or any cognitive incapacity[/QUOTE]And here we go again. Hur said Biden had a poor memory. Do people with dementia have good memories? And Oatmeal for Brains, you do not have to rely on Hur's word as the entire audio is available. When the American people saw Biden's performance in the debate, his numbers tanked, and you dumb Dems pulled him as your candidate. Your party said winning an election was more important what your own voters thought.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054169]You're even hanging on to the Trumpism / MAGA Cult BS for why there was not an inter-Party primary battle over the nomination when Harris the only candidate that would have access to the millions and millions of Biden-Harris campaign dollar donations heading into the election.[/QUOTE]That is the exact opposite of what John Morgan said. And Oatmeal for Brains, thanks for showing us that in your screwed up head that money was more important than following the will of the voters.
So after the impeachment crap, after the bogus criminal trial, after the civil lawsuits against Trump, once more, you show zero respect for the will of the voters. All your actions including sacking Biden showed you Democratic cultists have no respect for the voters.
Even after everything, 77 milllion people voted for Trump, and all you Democratic cultists do is call those voters stupid. People voted for Trump because they wanted their votes to count, and you Democrats wanted to win everywhere else but the ballot box.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054169]MAGA Bill Maher has never met a Democrat in any position to legislate or pass a law allowing children to choose a sex-change, never met one who thinks "men can get pregnant", never met one who wants to "defund the police" and on and on and on.[/QUOTE]MAGA Maher huh? More like Maher told you why the Democrats were going to lose and why they did lose. He wants the Democrats to go back to their liberal ways and away from the extreme wokeness and he is dead right. All you do is lie. The border was fine under Biden. We Dems did not want to defund the police or advocate for sex change surgeries. Give me a fucking break.
That Maher has the balls to tell the truth is what really irriates you Democratic cultists.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;3054214]Trump's core base (his "cult" of which you are a part) has consistently remained around 35% nationally. And in case you haven't noticed, his overall approval rating remains above that. So, his cult-like core remains with him. Of course you don't see it as a cult. That's because you're deep in it, constantly blinded by the Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) of which you and the rest of his sycophants sadly suffer. It's among the independents who he's been able to dupe twice that his support has really fallen. Scam an independent once, and that's on a Trumptard. But scam an independent twice, and that's on a stupid independent voter.
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/02/23/donald-trump-approval-rating/88176174007/[/URL][/QUOTE]Hey, Cane, I just laid out some criticisms of Trump. Can you name any positives about Trump whatsoever? Or can you name any criticisms of Democrats ever? Because I have not seen either from you.
-
[QUOTE=JohnClayton;3054113]To be fair, we don't have high electricity prices because we are weak, sloppy Democratic hippies, it's because we allowed the monopoly power supplier (PG&E) to deregulate in 1997 and them bailed them out of two subsequent bankruptcies caused by their greed and incompetence, letting them pass their capital costs to the hapless ratepayers.[/QUOTE]Sorry, JC, but other states deregulated utilities and are not paying near what California is. Bill Maher was griping about how it took him 2 years to put up solar panels.
Outside of a HOA in Texas whose rules vary tremendously, if you want solar panels in Texas, you just put them up, and there are efforts for even taking power away from HOAs to regulate solar panel instillation.
In California, I have just read it is mandated that buildings have solar panels, and with that, I am sure there all these sky high costing inspections and permits.
The problem with California is you keep shoving things down people's throats. Before solar panels, it was saying you could only have electric cars.
So no deregulation was not the problem. The way you guys handled deregulation was the problem. I have a hard time believing only a California utility was trying to screw people out of money, and every other utility in the country were angels.
-
Finally! Something to really put stuff into perspective
This is it! World War III comin at ya within the next 72 hours. Possibly even tonight! Woooooooooooooh!
And there I was worried about when to book my flights, if I go to Thailand at all.
Look fellas, when the world is about to end, it really puts things into perspective, it makes you realize what's truly important in life. It's not stupid shit like friends or family. Its sex. Hardcore, nasty, dirty sweaty, filthy sex. Pound that chick doggy style!
What stocks do you think will do well in a World War 3 nuke scenario?
-
You are like North Korean state news or the NYT
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054169]Your post not only supports the conclusion that Trumpism / MAGA is a cult, but it also supports the conclusion that you are still a card-carrying, certified member in good standing of that cult.
You proudly parrot the Trumpism / MAGA Cult BS about Biden's mental state then or now, his medical diagnosis, Harris' supposed alcoholic incapacity, blah, blah, blah, contrary to all available evidence and easily observable reality that your Cult has been hanging onto like rats on a rafter to excuse or justify your disastrous and traitorous vote for The Worst President in USA History and despite all of the available evidence and data showing Biden's 1 term was better for America, its economy and National Security than any "best" month of the Trump so-called presidency the first time around and this time around.
Life-long Republican attorney and Trump appointee Robert Hur spent hours interviewing Biden in 2024 and did not find or report one iota of evidence that Joe Biden had dementia or any cognitive incapacity despite tremendous pressure from his side to do so or that he was incapable of making better informed, smarter and more effective Presidential decisions, the purpose of the job, than Trump ever made on any day of his life. And there has been no credible report or evidence presented that supports your BS about Kamala Harris not being more fit to be President than Trump ever was and certainly more than he is now.
That, Sir, is a Cult. And the fact that you can't admit you made a grave mistake in voting for Trump any of the times he ran for president based on the BS you have been fed by that Cult and its Dear Leader proves you are a member of that Cult committed to being willfully ignorant about what plenty of other Americans now realize was an election they sorely wish could be done over..[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/democrats-slam-democrats-rigging-democrat-primaries[/URL]
-
After Gaza, criminal Netanyahou keeping on his war business, now attacking Iran and of course, Trump support his criminal friend. Really wish Israel will get rid of their criminal, when he is a very bad image for Israel, same like crazy Trump is a very bad image for USA. In FKKs, when I see a beauty but with bad image, usually due to her behavior in public, then I don t pay for her, when I hate vulgarity, not exciting me at all. I stopped with a FKK superstar after around 80 hours spent together during 10 months, but not anymore a good image for me. She didn't understand, I stopped like this, just because of her public behavior, when she was always great for me. Russia start to have big economical problems, because of Putin craziness, when he was not able to defeat poor Ukraine since 4 years, when Ukrainians are so courageous heroic.
-
3 photos
My side?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3054385]MAGA didn't drop Biden from the ticket. You dumb Dems did that on your own ignoring the will of your voters. This is classic TDS, blaming Trump when the only he did was kick Biden's ass during a debate.
Again, this is from your side. [URL]https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/obama-pelosi-did-not-want-harris-democratic-megadonor/[/URL]
LOL. Again, from your side, Democratic megadonor John Morgan joined "CUOMO" on Monday night to discuss the failed Harris-Walz campaign, claiming former President Barack Obama and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not want Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee to replace President Joe Biden.
Biden stepped down from the presidential race in July, amid pressure from high-ranking Democratic figures. He endorsed Harris no less than an hour later, while former President Obama took five days to endorse Harris on his X page.
"he did not want to go gently," Morgan said of Biden. "he nominated her, basically Obama did not want her. Obama did not endorse her for five days, Pelosi did not want her."
According to Morgan, Biden's endorsement of Harris was an "F you" to Obama and Pelosi.
"Pelosi told her California delegation, there will be a conference, there will be a caucus, there will be a convention," Morgan said, a point touched upon by many Republican politicians and commentators during the process. "We basically ran on this deal where 'democracy, democracy!' And then we didn't have democracy in picking our nominee. "
Morgan, who admitted he did not personally donate to Harris's campaign, criticized the way the campaign handled its funds, saying it could put her presidential future in doubt.
Morgan's critique comes amid multiple reports the Harris campaign is $20 million in debt after a lavish spending spree.
The megadonor claimed those alleged squandered campaign funds should permanently disqualify her from running for president again.
"The same thing is going to follow Harris for the rest of her career. She cannot be trusted with the money, and the donors are going to be, like, 'Where is this money? He said.
And let me guess your cult like answer Tooms. You are going to blast this guy Morgan like you do Bill Maher. Yeah, anyone who criticizes the Democratic party is a bothsider to you because you are in a cult.
And here we go again. Hur said Biden had a poor memory. Do people with dementia have good memories? And Oatmeal for Brains, you do not have to rely on Hur's word as the entire audio is available. When the American people saw Biden's performance in the debate, his numbers tanked, and you dumb Dems pulled him as your candidate. Your party said winning an election was more important what your own voters thought..[/QUOTE]The pro Repub Mainstream Media and political donors that wanted Biden out are not "my side", you Demented MAGA Cult Member numbskull.
Hur's characterization of Biden likely coming across as an elderly man with a poor memory has zero to do with his fitness to serve as president, could easily have accurately applied to Eisenhower in 1953, Reagan in 1981 and is still better than a 79 year old who insists China pays our import taxes for us in the Trillions and mistook a photo of his sexual assault accuser for a photo of his ex-wife.
[URL]https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/heres-what-could-happen-next-as-biden-drops-out-and-endorses-harris-in-the-2024-race[/URL]
[QUOTE][b]What happens to Biden's campaign money?[/b]
Biden's campaign recently reported $91 million cash on hand. Allied Democratic campaign committees brought the total at his disposal to more than $240 million. [B]Campaign finance experts agree generally that Harris could control all those funds since the campaign was set up in her name as well as Biden's.[/b] If Democrats do nominate someone other than Harris, party accounts could still benefit the nominee, but the Biden-Harris account would have more restrictions. [B]For example, legal experts say it could become an independent expenditure political action committee but not simply transfer its balance to a different nominee.[/b][/QUOTE]MAGA Bill Maher repeats his beloved Repub MAGA Cult talking points about trannies, wokeism, regulation, law and order, etc, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary with raised voice, passionate, desk-pounding anger while discussing Trumpian MAGA's violent, cop-killing attempt to overturn a free and fair election, overthrow American democracy and assassinate a few elected officials along the way, sending masked and armed marauders in America's most important cities to hassle, harass, shoot and kill law-abiding American Citizens because his lovable dinner partner Trump's feelings were hurt that they didn't vote for him with the cool calm of an intellectial exercize, often with the humorous tone of it all being just a joke.
That is MAGA Bill Maher's BS version of being "fair and balanced" when any observer with at least 2 brain cells to rub together can see immediately that his purpose is to slam Dems and help Repubs win elections.
77 million Americans voted for Trump? That means 78 million Americans voted for NOT Trump, including 75 million that voted for the mixed race female VP that you claim is such a broken down drunk she might even be capable of believing China pays America's imported taxes for us in the Trillions. Where is your passionate argument in favor of democracy and against the undemocratic conditions that put Trump in the WH in 2017 and GW Bush in the WH in 2001?
And now, just one year later, several credible polls are showing more Americans have now realized Biden was a better president than Trump and wish they could elect either Biden or Harris over Trump today.
Only hardcore Trumpian MAGA Cult Members would think otherwise.
-
Donald Trump
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3054386]Hey, Cane, I just laid out some criticisms of Trump. Can you name any positives about Trump whatsoever?[/QUOTE]No, I cannot. As a President, I find Donald Trump to be a man of no redeeming qualities. I deem him to be the absolute worst President in the entire history of the United States of America. My country. A country that I love. I know a lot of people say things like that, and it comes across as hyperbole. But, I really mean it. And it's because of his repeated and blatant disregard for the Constitution, including his demand that his acolytes also denigrate the law of the land in favor of singular loyalty to him. You're one of his hardcore followers. Therefore, I shall leave it to you to name his supposed positives. After all, you're good at doing that! So, I invite you to continue. Stop this phony show of role reversal, and go ahead and count the many ways. I'm certain some will listen.
-
1 photos
Trump, The Man of Peace, Bombs Another Country Again!
Trump will do anything to change the subject of his disastrous economic policy results, that accusation of repeated sexual assaults and beatings from 13-14 year old girls, the overwhelming special election victories for Dems over the past 14 months and his atrocious poll numbers.
In typical Trump style, the World had an Iran Nuclear Agreement put together by Obama and verified to be working by Trump's own administration, Trump tore it up, Trump realizes he needs a solution like Obama negotiated or he'll have to start another Repub War, Trump can't negotiate a agreement even half as good as the one Obama negotiated, so Trump starts another Repub War.
Crap Repub economic results and another quagmire, no win Repub War, both of which will be left to the next Dem Administration to fix and clean up the colossal mess the Repub created.
Oh well. We tried.
[B]Trump says U.S. military has begun major combat operations in Iran[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/28/trump-us-military-iran-strikes-middle-east-oil.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]U..S. President Donald Trump confirms U.S. military operations against Iran are underway.
Several ministries in southern Tehran have been targeted, Iranian official tells Reuters.
In Tehran, witnesses heard the blast. Iranian state television later reported on the explosion, without offering a cause.
The Israeli military said it has identified missiles launched from Iran toward Israel.
Airlines start diverting flights around region.[/QUOTE]Then again, Biden stuttered and flipped a couple of words at the end of one of his lucid, well-informed and intelligent responses to every one of those debate quiz questions and Harris had a laugh that annoyed some insecure hillbilly MAGA males.
So there is that.
-
ICE is not interested in doing quality police work!
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3054336]Isn't ICE investigating about this? Rather than killing.[/QUOTE]NWA wrote about ICE in 1989. The song was called: [B]Fuk da Police[/B].
[QUOTE]Fuck the police comin' straight from the underground
A young (redacted) got it bad 'cause I'm brown
And not the other color, so police think
They have the authority to kill a minority[/QUOTE]All you have to know is that ICE refuses to do real investigative work and are a rouge agency acting as a Presidential Secret Police force in the Dis United States of America.
-
Send those ICE wannabe hard-asses to Iran and Venezuela.
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;3054488]NWA wrote about ICE in 1989. The song was called: [B]Fuk da Police[/B].
All you have to know is that ICE refuses to do real investigative work and are a rouge agency acting as a Presidential Secret Police force in the Dis United States of America.[/QUOTE]As ultra-warmonger Trump would have it, his War in Iran and regime change there and in Venezuela is the key to "Making America Great Again Unlike Anything Anyone Has Ever Seen. "
So there is no better use for his massively-funded, masked and armed American Citizen-killers than to load all of them onto Airforce One and Dumbo-drop them into Iran and Venezuela so they can show us and the rest of the World how tough guys can get'er done in the Repub regime change game.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;3054466]No, I cannot. As a President, I find Donald Trump to be a man of no redeeming qualities. I deem him to be the absolute worst President in the entire history of the United States of America. My country. A country that I love. I know a lot of people say things like that, and it comes across as hyperbole. But, I really mean it. And it's because of his repeated and blatant disregard for the Constitution, including his demand that his acolytes also denigrate the law of the land in favor of singular loyalty to him. You're one of his hardcore followers. Therefore, I shall leave it to you to name his supposed positives. After all, you're good at doing that! So, I invite you to continue. Stop this phony show of role reversal, and go ahead and count the many ways. I'm certain some will listen.[/QUOTE]Trump gives worst image of USA to the world except Netanyahou and Putin and he is crazy dangerous for our world, for safety, economics and pollution killing our planet. Only good point is he can t last for long.
-
Ice
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;3054488]NWA wrote about ICE in 1989. The song was called: [B]Fuk da Police[/B].
All you have to know is that ICE refuses to do real investigative work and are a rouge agency acting as a Presidential Secret Police force in the Dis United States of America.[/QUOTE]The problem isn't ICE: the problem is Trump. We have had and will have immigration enforcement. Everyone on here knows that. When we arrive in foreign countries we have to get permission to bet there. It will always be there and this notion that we rid ourselves of immigration enforcement is pure fantasy.
-
When Ramadan now, many US Americans may die now all over the world, because of Trump.
-
I totally called it!
Yoh dudes I totally called it! Look back at what I wrote yesterday baby! WW3, fucking finally!
But now though comes the really tough decision. To go to Bangkok or not? I was going to transit via Dubai or Doha, well that plan's out the window. Although to be honest I way prefer to transit via Japan or Seoul. Heck, even Taipei is ok. Them East Asian countries have better airlines if you ask me.
Now that armageddon has started, should I still get my dick wet in Thailand? Come to think of it, end of the world is the best reason to start fucking. Ok, let's pray to Satan I can get back to Thailand to fuck before the nukes come a flying.
-
Greatest President in History
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054477]Trump will do anything to change the subject of his disastrous economic policy results, that accusation of repeated sexual assaults and beatings from 13-14 year old girls, the overwhelming special election victories for Dems over the past 14 months and his atrocious poll numbers.
In typical Trump style, the World had an Iran Nuclear Agreement put together by Obama and verified to be working by Trump's own administration, Trump tore it up, Trump realizes he needs a solution like Obama negotiated or he'll have to start another Repub War, Trump can't negotiate a agreement even half as good as the one Obama negotiated, so Trump starts another Repub War.
Crap Repub economic results and another quagmire, no win Repub War, both of which will be left to the next Dem Administration to fix and clean up the colossal mess the Repub created.
Oh well. We tried.
[B]Trump says U.S. military has begun major combat operations in Iran[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/28/trump-us-military-iran-strikes-middle-east-oil.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
Then again, Biden stuttered and flipped a couple of words at the end of one of his lucid, well-informed and intelligent responses to every one of those debate quiz questions and Harris had a laugh that annoyed some insecure hillbilly MAGA males.
So there is that.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2026/02/28/trump-confirms-ayatollah-ali-khamenei-is-dead-one-of-the-most-evil-people-in-history/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/01/opinion/iran-trump-bad-faith.html[/URL]
Easily better than all the previous ones combined.
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3054541]The problem isn't ICE: the problem is Trump. We have had and will have immigration enforcement. Everyone on here knows that. When we arrive in foreign countries we have to get permission to bet there. It will always be there and this notion that we rid ourselves of immigration enforcement is pure fantasy.[/QUOTE]Of course, big problem is crazy dangerous Trump putting big shame on USA. When Putin play with Russian meat since 4 years, Trump will make US meat now all over the world, and he can keep on making big fantasies for Nobel award. He was not able to stop Putin, but tried to fuck Ukrainians fortunately supported by Europe. He tries to fuck Greenland, he makes war with Venezuela and now Iran, what a great peaceful guy, but for sure a shameful dangerous guy who deeply fuck US, with inflation, lost jobs, USD fall, killing people with ICE, fucking democracy, like he fucked constitution and capitol. Poor Americans, dream about MAGA.
-
The problem is ICE!
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3054541]The problem isn't ICE: the problem is Trump. We have had and will have immigration enforcement. Everyone on here knows that. When we arrive in foreign countries we have to get permission to bet there. It will always be there and this notion that we rid ourselves of immigration enforcement is pure fantasy.[/QUOTE]Show me another Federal Agency wearing masks to perform their law enforcement work. There are standards of professional law enforcement at the Federal Level. ICE does not meet them.
[B]The problem is ICE![/B]
-
3 photos
Trump explains why he started his Iran War
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3054656][b]Greatest President in History[/b]
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2026/02/28/trump-confirms-ayatollah-ali-khamenei-is-dead-one-of-the-most-evil-people-in-history/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/01/opinion/iran-trump-bad-faith.html[/URL]
Easily better than all the previous ones combined.[/QUOTE][B]In his own words:[/B]
[URL]https://youtube.com/shorts/siIXYtutmW8?si=30XZysgkEgJ0Hl-N[/URL]
That certainly makes sense on behalf of his beleaguered and mid-term doomed Party. But it could still apply to him if he gets 5 or 6 of his MAGAs on the SCOTUS to delay ruling on the Constitutionality of a 3rd run for the WH until at least 2033.
But I think the most obvious and logical reasons are why the real reasons why.
And there are many:
To distract from those newly-revealed accusations of multiple sexual assaults, rape and battery from woman who was 13-14 at the time.
His dreadful economic policy results vs those of Joe Biden and every other Dem in history.
His crashing poll numbers.
The overwhelming losses by his Party in virtually every special election over the past 14 months.
And, of course, the bribes he and his family have taken from Iran's competitors in the region so he will commit American military and civilian lives, American tax-payer dollars and America's previously credible standing in the world to the mission of making their wealthy leaders even wealthier; the airliner bribe from Qatar, the bailout bribe of his family's failing crypto venture by the UAE, the $2 Billion bribe to son-in-law Jared Kushner and by extension his daughter he has listed for probably since infancy from Saudi Arabia.
And maybe a few other bribes that have yet to be reported.
But his own reasoning for why he would do it as stated in that short video linked above was probably enough to convince him to do it even without all those blatantly obvious bribes.
-
Already 3 deaths and 5 injured for US meat for crazy Trump and probably not finished. Forget peace Nobel award.
-
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;3054681]Show me another Federal Agency wearing masks to perform their law enforcement work. There are standards of professional law enforcement at the Federal Level. ICE does not meet them.
[B]The problem is ICE![/B][/QUOTE]The fact that they are wearing masks is besides the point. They only started wearing masks when Trump became president in the second term. You want to fix ICE you have ton go through the president it's that simple. I can't stand the man but the same people following ICE are the ones who helped put him there. Why were students protesting at Colombia wearing masks or concealing their identities. Talking about hypocrisy.
Elections have consequences.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054690][B]In his own words:[/B]
[URL]https://youtube.com/shorts/siIXYtutmW8?si=30XZysgkEgJ0Hl-N[/URL]
That certainly makes sense on behalf of his beleaguered and mid-term doomed Party. But it could still apply to him if he gets 5 or 6 of his MAGAs on the SCOTUS to delay ruling on the Constitutionality of a 3rd run for the WH until at least 2033.
But I think the most obvious and logical reasons are why the real reasons why.
And there are many:
To distract from those newly-revealed accusations of multiple sexual assaults, rape and battery from woman who was 13-14 at the time.
His dreadful economic policy results vs those of Joe Biden and every other Dem in history.
His crashing poll numbers.[/QUOTE]4 women accusing Trump to have abused them, when they were not in majority yet. A Epstein twin?
-
Netanyahou keeping on his war business, attacking countries all around. After destroying Gaza, now Iran, Lebanon. He does because he knows he is supported by Trump. 2 crazy. To count how many US deaths, even they are military, because of Trump.
-
That's what she said, In his own words, quite being a parrot for Madcow
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054690][B]In his own words:[/B]
[URL]https://youtube.com/shorts/siIXYtutmW8?si=30XZysgkEgJ0Hl-N[/URL]
That certainly makes sense on behalf of his beleaguered and mid-term doomed Party. But it could still apply to him if he gets 5 or 6 of his MAGAs on the SCOTUS to delay ruling on the Constitutionality of a 3rd run for the WH until at least 2033.
But I think the most obvious and logical reasons are why the real reasons why.
And there are many:
To distract from those newly-revealed accusations of multiple sexual assaults, rape and battery from woman who was 13-14 at the time..[/QUOTE]In his own words, quit regurgitating Madcows diarrhea.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/iran-question-all-about-china[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3054712]Already 3 deaths and 5 injured for US meat for crazy Trump and probably not finished. Forget peace Nobel award.[/QUOTE]And 3 F15 shot on Trump new war, after Venezuela.
-
3 photos
Setting the record straight and to be clear:
Lying Liars like Ultra-Warmongering Liar Donald Trump and Liar Pete KegsBreath are just going to lie.
Back in 2017, Trump lied about Iran not complying with the Nuclear Deal as his reason for abandoning it. Then in 2026, Trump and Hegseth lied about it again as the reason for their unconstitutional War in Iran:
[B]Trump on Irans Multiple Violations[/B]
[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/trump-irans-multiple-violations/[/URL]
[QUOTE]In refusing to certify the Iran nuclear deal, President Donald Trump said Iran has committed multiple violations of the agreement. But thats not the finding of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
The IAEA has issued eight reports since the agreement was implemented in January 2016, and all eight have found Iran is implementing the agreement most recently on Aug. 31.
Trump himself has certified to Congress on two occasions that Iran has complied with the nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA. The president must issue a certification every 90 days.[/QUOTE]Yep. Donnie owed Bibi a lot in exchange for him delaying that May 2024 ceasefire deal until after the November election in order to ensure juuuuust enough angry Muslim voters in the only 3 swing states that mattered would shift their usual Dem votes to the Repub, which resulted in them being solely responsible for "giving Trump the presidency."
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;3054466]No, I cannot. As a President, I find Donald Trump to be a man of no redeeming qualities. I deem him to be the absolute worst President in the entire history of the United States of America.[/QUOTE]Unlike Tooms, I am not going to get into the economic crap. Just to show you how badly your head is in the sand, Trump has ousted Maduro in Venezuela. That country with its 30 million people have hopes now for a better life and more importantly, Trump has taken control of their finances and can dictate where the money now goes. Before, it was going to offshore bank accounts in the names of Venezuelan leadership. No more.
Then you have thousands in Iran massacred by their current leadership during demonstrations. Trump took out their supreme leader. The playbook will be the same. He is going to take out their island where they export their crude, and Iran will have no money to export terrorism, no money to bribe its leaders, and despite their talk now, the Iranians will come to the bargaining table. They have to.
Add it up, and you have 120 million people who may be living better lives because of Trump, and Cane, your head is so far up your ass that you do not even see that potential. Of all the things you dumb Dems were crying about, the absolute worst was the griping about that pond scum of a man Maduro. Anybody who criticized Trump for that has a seething case of TDS.
[QUOTE=TheCane;3054466]You're one of his hardcore followers.[/QUOTE]LOL. Since when? Trump got his ass handed to him by SCOTUS on tariffs, and he deserved it. He has made impetuous and crazy decisions on tariffs and other foreign matters based on which foreign leaders he personally likes and dislikes. His administration has completely botched the handling of the relase of the Epstein files. He gave lip service to cutting spending and is now spending again like a drunken sailor. The Trump kids are cutting Hunter Biden like deals, and Republicans are not happy about it.
I have been told that if the Dems brought impeachment hearings, and the vote to impeach were private, Trump would have the support of 20 senators. IOW, he would be gone, and I would be okay with that. I am actually ready for a boring bureaucrat like Desantis who can get the trains to run on time or an Obama who told his followers to drum up support for a position versus a president like Trump acting entirely on his own and making promises way out of his lane. The problem with Trump and the critics like Tooms was brought up by Bill Maher. They think the president controls everything, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KuNI0V3JkM[/URL], and you dumb Dems with your TDS buy into it.
With you dumb Dems, you blame everything wrong in government on Trump. Everybody else in government save for Trump and part of his administration is fucking perfect, and that is why your TDS is so destructive. Most members of Congress in both parties are doing very little outside of enriching themselves.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054464]The pro Repub Mainstream Media and political donors that wanted Biden out are not "my side", you Demented MAGA Cult Member numbskull.[/QUOTE]This is where you lose it. You are so binary, so partisan, so screwed in the head, you think Republicans ousted Biden from the Democratic ticket.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054464]Hur's characterization of Biden likely coming across as an elderly man with a poor memory has zero to do with his fitness to serve as president[/QUOTE]LOL. I repeat. Your own party sacked him because he was demented and could not win after the debate with Trump.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054464]MAGA Bill Maher repeats his beloved Repub MAGA Cult talking points about trannies, wokeism, regulation, law and order, etc, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary with raised voice, passionate, desk-pounding anger[/QUOTE]Maher and rational people like him were whom changed the election in 2024. You Dems alienated a lot of the sane people who were voting Democrat, and Maher is one of the ones who voted for Harris despite how crazy the progressives in the Democratic party are. Unlike you, Maher has the balls to call out his party when they are wrong.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054464]That means 78 million Americans voted for NOT Trump, including 75 million that voted for the mixed race female VP that you claim is such a broken down drunk[/QUOTE]Yeah, it is just me who thinks she is a drunk who sucked her way to the top. Tooms, Harris got 1% of the votes in the election primary season in 2020. Maybe there were a few people who actually liked Harris, but I have not heard one. She got votes because she was a Democrat and because she was not Trump. Hell, the Dems may have won in 2024 if they put up someone other than a drunk or someone with dementia.
Thing is I am hearing that the Dems are still fucking around with the elites picking the candidates in the Democratic party. Man, you would hope you all would learn to let the people pick your candidate, but your elites just cannot fucking let go.
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3054712]Already 3 deaths and 5 injured for US meat for crazy Trump and probably not finished. Forget peace Nobel award.[/QUOTE]1 more US piece of meat, now 4, for Trump who already killed 2 citizens with ICE. Trump and his gang who were never at war, will learn this is not playing golf in Florida, when USA lost many last wars and Vietnam and Afghanistan.
-
The party named after Democracy hates Democracy (but loves the oligarchy)
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054690][B]In his own words:[/B]
[URL]https://youtube.com/shorts/siIXYtutmW8?si=30XZysgkEgJ0Hl-N[/URL]
That certainly makes sense on behalf of his beleaguered and mid-term doomed Party. But it could still apply to him if he gets 5 or 6 of his MAGAs on the SCOTUS to delay ruling on the Constitutionality of a 3rd run for the WH until at least 2033.
But I think the most obvious and logical reasons are why the real reasons why.
And there are many:
To distract from those newly-revealed accusations of multiple sexual assaults, rape and battery from woman who was 13-14 at the time.
His dreadful economic policy results vs those of Joe Biden and every other Dem in history.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ooBDZOQSEQ[/URL]
But he's lying about 2008 and everyone knows it.
Scumbag Pelosi and Ted Kennedy rigged the outcome of the primaries to hand it to Scumbag Barry Hussein.
And cockblock Scumbag Bubba from a 3rd and 4th term.
Allahu Akbar.
-
ICE is the problem!
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3054840] for Trump who already killed 2 citizens with [b]ICE[/b]. [/QUOTE]Damn straight and yet we have people up in here that believe the hype.
ICE is a out of control rogue Federal Agency who has been emboldened to kill my fellow Citizens in the Dis United States of America at will due to the backing of the current administration.
-
Did you get this crap from North Korean state media?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054690][B]In his own words:[/B]
[URL]https://youtube.com/shorts/siIXYtutmW8?si=30XZysgkEgJ0Hl-N[/URL]
That certainly makes sense on behalf of his beleaguered and mid-term doomed Party. But it could still apply to him if he gets 5 or 6 of his MAGAs on the SCOTUS to delay ruling on the Constitutionality of a 3rd run for the WH until at least 2033.
But I think the most obvious and logical reasons are why the real reasons why.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/03/02/poll-republicans-surge-in-general-ballot-move-closer-to-defying-history-of-congressional-midterms/[/URL]
-
3 photos
Has MAGA Bill Maher publicly apologized yet?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3054814]This is where you lose it. You are so binary, so partisan, so screwed in the head, you think Republicans ousted Biden from the Democratic ticket.
LOL. I repeat. Your own party sacked him because he was demented and could not win after the debate with Trump.
Maher and rational people like him were whom changed the election in 2024. You Dems alienated a lot of the sane people who were voting Democrat, and Maher is one of the ones who voted for Harris despite how crazy the progressives in the Democratic party are. Unlike you, Maher has the balls to call out his party when they are wrong..[/QUOTE]First of all, the political donors I was referring to were the Democratic Party political donors who, along with the typically pro Repub Mainstream Media, provided the stick and carrot or lack of carrot to push the replacement of Biden as a candidate. Neither of whom are "my side".
But on to the point of this post.
MAGA Bill Maher assured his viewers over and over again that one of the great things about his favorite dinner host Trump aside from him being a really, really, really nice guy in person, laughs at all of MAGA Bill's jokes and stuff like that dontcha' know, is that he really, really, really and you can take this to the bank because MAGA Bill and Donnie are very close now, he really, really, "really hates war."
Really.
Swear to god.
Hey, this is non partisan fair and balanced bothsider-neithersider hey I slam Dems with an angry passion but criticise Repubs with academic, even amused detachment, MAGA Bill Maher painting this lovely picture of a benevolent, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory here and so you can trust me that really nice guy Trump "really hates war."
Really.
So, has MAGA Bill apologized for getting that so wrong and selling it so convincingly to his audience on Trump's behalf and for his benefit since Iran, Venezuela, several other countries, Iran again with Repub Trump's Iran War and all that?
Oh, and who the fuck cares if Trump's MAGA Repub-controlled SCOTUS "handed Trump his ass on Tariffs" months and months and months, well, a year, after Trump used them for the only purpose he has ever even considered them; as a means to leverage personal and familial emoluments / bribes from every other country in the world who doesn't want their free market access to an international customer stifled while the American Consumer has to pay more for their goods?
Con man Donald Trump certainly doesn't give a fuck about that.
Because that same MAGA Repub-controlled SCOTUS very graciously ruled that he can go right ahead and defy any ruling he doesn't like, break any law he doesn't like with immunity from prosecution as long as he associates it with any procedure he himself deems to be an "official" act as president.
See how that works?
-
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;3054863]Damn straight and yet we have people up in here that believe the hype.
ICE is a out of control rogue Federal Agency who has been emboldened to kill my fellow Citizens in the Dis United States of America at will due to the backing of the current administration.[/QUOTE]Under Biden or Obama, did ICE kill citizens who were not immigrant? And now a crazy who dream about peace Nobel award, but start wars and will count US deaths.
-
1 photos
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054805]Lying Liars like Ultra-Warmongering Liar Donald Trump and Liar Pete KegsBreath are just going to lie.
Back in 2017, Trump lied about Iran not complying with the Nuclear Deal as his reason for abandoning it. Then in 2026, Trump and Hegseth lied about it again as the reason for their unconstitutional War in Iran:
[B]Trump on Irans Multiple Violations[/B]
[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/trump-irans-multiple-violations/[/URL]
Yep. Donnie owed Bibi a lot in exchange for him delaying that May 2024 ceasefire deal until after the November election in order to ensure juuuuust enough angry Muslim voters in the only 3 swing states that mattered would shift their usual Dem votes to the Repub, which resulted in them being solely responsible for "giving Trump the presidency."[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/02/us/politics/maduro-khamenei-trump-surveillance.html[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000010746931/trumps-head-on-a-pike-foreign-policy.html[/URL]
FUCK WINNIE THE POOH in his ugly little mouth.
I'm guessing now he's wearing diapers 24/7.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Reliablity?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3054064]Let's go back to what I say. I prefer what is going on in Texas. Use alternative energy when it is cost effective but understand its limitations. Do not push alternative energy up people's noses. Respect the fact that fossil fuels and nukes are more reliable than alternative energy and there is a 100 year infrastructure built up to support it.
...
And your dumb ass keeps going on about MAGA and fossil fuels. Everyone wants reliable energy, and you cannot get it through your thick skull that fossil fuels are more reliable than alternative energy.[/QUOTE]LOL! What the hell are you MAGA hillbilly talking about? Yeah, fossil fuels are "so reliable", that in that last 10 years, most (perhaps 91% of) all new electricity supplied to the Texas grid was renewables (S+W+B). They are so reliable, lets not install or build new power plants come online for the next 10 years?
Electricity generation in Texas has risen 104.6 million MWh, climbing from 391.9 million MWh in 2013 to 496.5 million MWh in 2023 and this increased generation was [B][i]supplied by renewables,[/i][/B] [U]not[/U] fossil fuels.
[B]Texas was able to meet all its power demand growth,[/B] more than 2. 6% a year, [B]with renewables.[/B] [URL]https://ieefa.org/resources/meeting-demand-growth-and-greening-grid-can-go-hand-hand[/URL].
Well, it would seem common sense told Texas, not to install much fossil fuels, for the last 10 years! Just like Pakistanis' common sense told them, solar rooftop was the best way to gain back control over their electricity bills.
Oh yeah, that 100 year grid infrastructure that you are babbling on about, is ageing, dying and struggling to meet modern electricity demands, with 70% of poles, wires, transmission lines, transformers, substations, all over 25 years old, with many approaching 50-80 years.
[B]PS:[/B] BTW, in a modern, well-designed grid, a combination of renewables plus storage can be just as reliable, if not more so, for a lower cost and with zero emissions.
-
If I had a functioning dick, I'd be rock hard now!
Wow sports fans! We're actually living through WW3! Holy cow! But goddamnit, where the nukes be at? I want armageddon! This is not the end times. I got to pay my taxes soon, can the world end now please? Jeeze louise.
I bet this is how people felt in 1941,1942 times. When the specter of the end times was near. The last few days not much happening yet. Missiles? Just drone and shit? Come on!
Let's get boots on the ground! They got to Call of Duty this shit like the video games.
I'm so tired of life, and I figure if my life is miserable, it's totally fine by me that everyone else's should be too. But it always seems like everyone is much better off. *sigh* sucks to be me. And not in the good way either. Well, let's just hope I get to get my dick wet one last time in Bangkok before the world ends!
-
2 photos
Uh-huh
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3054860][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ooBDZOQSEQ[/URL]
But he's lying about 2008 and everyone knows it.
Scumbag Pelosi and Ted Kennedy rigged the outcome of the primaries to hand it to Scumbag Barry Hussein.
And cockblock Scumbag Bubba from a 3rd and 4th term.
Allahu Akbar.[/QUOTE]Let's ask non Democrat Bernie Sanders where demanding every political Party have an election to choose who in its Party will run for election instead of the way it was done for more than 100 years after the days of Our Founding Fathers falls on his "Must Do" list of moves to ensure every vote counts in a democracy after, oh, no more gerrymandering, set the number of Senators according to the population of human beings in a State instead of tumbleweeds, cactus and rattlesnakes, unlimited executive orders, ending term limits, abandon the idiotic MAGA Repub SCOTUS ruling on presidential immunity, getting dark money out of elections, the end of the Electoral College, etc, etc, etc.
You know, some of the things NONE of the numbskulls demanding that the Democratic Party should have had an inter-Party battle over who might or might not get the nomination and access to the money with 100 days left to campaign against a Repub who led his mob to attack and kill cops as well as assassinate a few elected officials in order to overthrow American democracy and who had been campaigning for that 2nd term since 1 minute after lying about his Oath of Office the first time around, have ever complained about as "threats to democracy.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3054926]LOL! What the hell are you MAGA hillbilly talking about? Yeah, fossil fuels are "so reliable", that in that last 10 years, most (perhaps 91% of) all new electricity supplied to the Texas grid was renewables (S+W+B).[/QUOTE]Yeah, dummy, I live here. For the millionth time, alternatives make sense in places where the wind is blowing and sun is shining. Your dumb ass praises Germany for putting up solar in a country with little sun. You keep praising Europe while Europeans are lamenting shutting down nukes. Yeah, the solar in Germany worked so fucking great, they had to hook up to Russian gas, and all their while you dumb Dems are crying, "Why can't we be as smart as Europeans?
At this point, you are just pathetic.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054879]First of all, the political donors I was referring to were the Democratic Party political donors who, along with the typically pro Repub Mainstream Media[/QUOTE]This is the best example I could find of how biased "mainstream journalists" are with regards to Trump. CPI identified about 430 individuals working in journalism who contributed to either candidate between January 2015 and August 2016. Of the $396,000 they contributed, 96 percent ($382,000) went to Clinton, and 4 percent (about $14,000) went to Trump.
Give me an exmaple of the typically pro Republican mainstream media. Fox News? Did Fox tell the Democrats to oust Biden? OMG. Bagdad Bob, you are losing it.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3054879]MAGA Bill Maher assured his viewers over and over again that one of the great things about his favorite dinner host Trump aside from him being a really, really, really nice guy in person, laughs at all of MAGA Bill's jokes and stuff like that dontcha' know, is that he really, really, really and you can take this to the bank because MAGA Bill and Donnie are very close now, he really, really, "really hates war."
Really.
Swear to god.[/QUOTE]God? Are you talking about the Christian version of God or your version of God AKA the Democratic party? If it is the latter, yeah, I know how that God feels about Maher or anyone who speaks ill of the Democratic party. If it is the Christain God and you believe in heaven and hell, I know the place where you are headed.
-
Whomp whomp
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3054901][URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/02/us/politics/maduro-khamenei-trump-surveillance.html[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000010746931/trumps-head-on-a-pike-foreign-policy.html[/URL]
FUCK WINNIE THE POOH in his ugly little mouth.
I'm guessing now he's wearing diapers 24/7.[/QUOTE][URL]https://asiatimes.com/2026/03/trumps-strike-on-iran-hits-china-where-it-hurts/[/URL]
-
1 photos
Political donations by those in the media are irrelevant.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3055033]This is the best example I could find of how biased "mainstream journalists" are with regards to Trump. CPI identified about 430 individuals working in journalism who contributed to either candidate between January 2015 and August 2016. Of the $396,000 they contributed, 96 percent ($382,000) went to Clinton, and 4 percent (about $14,000) went to Trump.
Give me an exmaple of the typically pro Republican mainstream media. Fox News? Did Fox tell the Democrats to oust Biden? OMG. Bagdad Bob, you are losing it.
God? Are you talking about the Christian version of God or your version of God AKA the Democratic party? If it is the latter, yeah, I know how that God feels about Maher or anyone who speaks ill of the Democratic party. If it is the Christain God and you believe in heaven and hell, I know the place where you are headed.[/QUOTE]Wingers have been claiming the typically pro Mainstream Media are biased for Democrats because many people in the media donate to Democratic pols for decades and decades. At least 100 years. All through the time they were convincing you and millions of other voters that "Republicans are better at handling the economy than Democrats" while time after time after time Repubs were driving us into one Great Depression, Great Recession or Massive Jobs Destruction after another and none of the great economic recoveries, great economic expansions or historic jobs creation while at the same time Democrats were producing every great economic recovery, great economic expansion or historic jobs creation and none of the Great Depressions, Great Recessions or historic jobs destruction.
MSM knows how well bad news sells, terrible news sells more and catastrophic news sells the most.
That is why they try to help Repubs win elections over Dems.
Of course, everyone who is better informed will support and vote for Dems. Members of MSM would rank high among the most informed. But that isn't the side that produces horrific economic and national security results and consequently the terrible headlines they crave in order to attract more eyes and ears to their service and put more immediate income into their pockets.
The fact that ANYBODY thinks Biden couldn't walk, couldn't talk, didn't know who he was, where he was or what he was doing at any time including during that debate with Trump where 30% of the people who watched it thought Biden won, compared to only 20% thinking Obama won his first debate of his 2nd term campaign, is all the proof anyone needs to accept that MSM was where that blatant lie was created, nurtured and made "common knowledge."
Do you think Repubs are "better at handling the economy than Democrats"?
If you do then you have been suckered by terrible headlines-craving MSM into believing such hogwash.
Do you believe Joe Biden didn't know who he was, where he was or what he was doing and answered every question with incoherent blather during that debate while Donald Trump's responses were lucid, pertinent to the topic of the question, well-informed, coherent and insightful?
Then you have been suckered by terrible headlines-craving MSM into believing such hogwash.
And so were the big Democratic donors like that Disney lady who pulled her donations for all down ballot Dems unless Biden pulled out and then she was fine with it when Harris replaced him.
-
3 photos
As predictable as night following day
Whomp whomp, indeed.
[B]Private companies added 63,000 jobs in February, ADP says.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/04/private-companies-added-63000-jobs-in-february-january-revised-to-just-11000-additions-adp-says.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Companies added 63,000 workers in February, an improvement from the [b]downwardly revised 11,000 in January[/b] and better than the consensus estimate for 48,000.
Most of the hiring came in just two sectors: health services and construction.[b] Job growth in other sectors either was flat or lower.[/b]
Pay grew 4.5% for those staying in their jobs while wage gains for job switchers moved down to 6.3%, the smallest gap since ADP began tracking the metric.[/QUOTE]Will Trump's disastrous classic Repub economic policies and stewardship once again result in there being millions fewer jobs in the economy when / if he leaves office in January 2029 than when he took office in January 2026, as was the case in his first term?
He sure as hell is working on repeating that historically disastrous result. Stay tuned.
-
3 photos
Hey, how about those gas prices?
Yep. Looks like more whomp whomp.
The average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA today is higher than it was yesterday, higher than it was a week ago, both of those are higher than it was a month ago and higher today than it was in February 2025, the first full month of Trump's 2nd disastrous term.
In fact, it is higher today than it was all the way back in October 2024 under Biden, well before the election.
See the screenshots below.
Bear in mind, that was when it was on a dramatic decline from a temporary increase while today it is on a dramatic increase.
Oh, and that was when Biden-Harris were recovering us and the rest of the world from the economic catastrophe of Trump's Pandemic, recovering the millions of jobs Trump's worst economic and national security decisions wiped out followed by creating millions more jobs than all three Repub presidents' economies combined, including Trump, of course. Yes, yes, yes, they were by far mostly private-sector jobs, not government jobs, you Trumpian / MAGA Cult bonehead liars.
But these skyrocketing gas prices under Trump are happening while his economy is producing some of the worst jobs numbers decades, at least since he and other previous Repubs were president. And that is after Trump fired and threatened to fire any BLS and Fed official who dared to report numbers that make him look bad. So we can only imagine how much worse these jobs numbers are really.
Oh well. We tried.
-
Yawn, nothing's really happening with this war
Jeeze. This war is so boring. Some dead people, sure. But no real excitement know what I mean? Coupla drones here and there. Bunch of rich idiots trapped in luxury Dubai. Boo hoo! Real sad.
I'm beginning to lose interest. I'm not rock hard anymore.
Call me when there's like actual World War 3 action happening. How is this even 'War', when there's no boots on the ground? The Vietnam days were way more exciting!
With video technology today, you'd think we'd see more explosions up close.
Should I still go to Bangkok? Satan knows I want to. Come on you guys. You idiots voted for orange, why can't he make the war more exciting and entertaining for us to watch then? We're already in a dystopia, let's just go all the way to armageddon baby!
-
1 photos
Trump slaughtering more than 100 school children is not exciting enough for you?
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3055114]Jeeze. This war is so boring. Some dead people, sure. But no real excitement know what I mean? Coupla drones here and there. Bunch of rich idiots trapped in luxury Dubai. Boo hoo! Real sad.
I'm beginning to lose interest. I'm not rock hard anymore.
Call me when there's like actual World War 3 action happening. How is this even 'War', when there's no boots on the ground? The Vietnam days were way more exciting!
With video technology today, you'd think we'd see more explosions up close.
Should I still go to Bangkok? Satan knows I want to. Come on you guys. You idiots voted for orange, why can't he make the war more exciting and entertaining for us to watch then? We're already in a dystopia, let's just go all the way to armageddon baby![/QUOTE]Trump and KegsBreath slaughtered over 100 school kids, mostly little girls, in just the first 72 hours of their totally unprovoked Iran War.
Anti-west Jihadists will never forgive and forget that. Trump thinks he is the King of Retribution? Thanks to him the American people are destined to find out what decades of retribution for shit like that looks and feels like.
[B]New information about the bombing of a school in Iran
March 4, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.npr.org/2026/03/04/nx-s1-5736528/new-information-about-the-bombing-of-a-school-in-iran[/URL]
[QUOTE]New details are emerging about the bombing of a girls school in southeastern Iran that killed 165 people, many of them students, according to Iran state media. The Pentagon says it is investigating what happened. Meanwhile satellite images suggest it could have been a precision airstrike. NPR was the first to report on the new images, and we hear more about what they reveal.[/QUOTE]And that is just in the first week or so of Trump's Iran War.
It turns out the 3-4 preferred replacements for the dead Supreme Leader in Iran were also killed by the USA / Israeli bombs that presumably killed to 86 year old leader who had been diagnosed with cancer and hadn't been seen in public for weeks before Trump started the Iran War.
Consider the obvious implications of that; in all likelihood those 3-4 preferred replacements were near the dying Ayatollah's death bed in order to be on hand to replace him when he died anyway, War or no War. Preferred by America because they were more moderate than the one who died or was killed by America. So Iran was preparing to replace him with a more moderate leader, preferred by America for that very reason.
No more.
Those moderate replacements were killed by Donald Trump and Pete KegsBreath.
Now the replacement will likely be the old leader's son, reported to already have been more hardline anti-west than his daddy. And he will be replacing him as the USA bombs are dropping on his country, slaughtering his country's school children.
Good move, MAGAs.
Thank you for your vote, MAGAs and especially that relatively tiny handful of angry Muslims in the only 3 swing states that mattered that gave Trump the presidency.
Stand by. What MAGAs, those angry Muslims, convicted Felon Trump and KegsBreath have wrought in order to payback a few uber wealthy leaders of countries in that region for the bribes they gifted to Trump and his crime family is going to make your life, the lives of every American, their children and their children's children's children very, very exciting.
-
2 photos
So much for that MAGA BS about Trump playing 4 dimensional chess
It has been hilarious to read and hear desperate MAGA BS justifications for Trump's disastrous Iran War that he is playing some kind of 4 dimensional chess where the traffic of oil to and from adversaries like Russia and China are being disrupted during this Trump Payback For Angry Muslim Voter Election Wins and Other Bribes War in Iran.
[B]U.S. gives India a 30-day waiver to buy Russian oil as Iran war pushes oil higher[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/06/us-india-waiver-russian-oil-iran-war-energy-supply-worries-.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]U.S. has issued a 30-day waiver to the worlds third-largest oil importer, India, to resume purchase oil from Russia.
The U.S. government is taking steps to curb rising oil prices, including offering political risk insurance for tankers transiting the Gulf.
India has been reducing Russian oil purchases with supply from Middle East.[/QUOTE]The overwhelming Repub Trumpian / MAGA Cult support for Man of Peace Trump's bombing of at least 7 countries, starting the Venezuela War, the Iran War, etc just in his first year in office confirms that Trump has in fact had "immunity" from blame and prosecution for any crime he commits from his Repub Trumpian / MAGA Cult supporters all along.
He knew that as far back as when he proudly proclaimed he could shoot somebody on 5th Avenue and not lose any of that support.
So it really doesn't matter to him how horrible any of his catastrophic economic, national security and foreign policy decision results turn out.
If we lose the quagmire Repub Trump no-win War in Iran as we lost the Repub Eisenhower no-win War in Vietnam, the Repub GW Bush no-win War in Iraq, the Repub GW Bush no-win War in Afghanistan, that is no big deal to Repub Trump or any of his Repub Trumpian / MAGA Cult members. He and they will always come up with some lamebrained justification for it that blames everyone else but them or spins some truly bizarro world "positive" out of it.
We see the evidence it right here.
The USA could lose Repub Trump's Iran War and Trump knows very well he only needs to go online or waddle over to a podium and say a few incoherent gobbledygook words that sound vaguely like how great it is that he and only he could have won that War so perfectly and his Cult will go along with that nonsense.
LOL. Iranian Ayatollahs could invade America after their victory, take over the White House and assume total control of Congress and Repub Trumpian / MAGA Cult members would still repeat over and over again how much worse it would have been if they had not voted for Trump and instead "cognitively impaired" Joe Biden, who "didn't know who he was, where he was or what he was doing", had continued his run and won or that "alcoholic" Kamala Harris had won and we would be doomed to hear her laugh every few months. Lolol.
-
I'm pretty sure the IDF hit the school
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3055172]Trump and KegsBreath slaughtered over 100 school kids, mostly little girls, in just the first 72 hours of their totally unprovoked Iran War.
Anti-west Jihadists will never forgive and forget that. Trump thinks he is the King of Retribution? Thanks to him the American people are destined to find out what decades of retribution for shit like that looks and feels like.
[B]New information about the bombing of a school in Iran
March 4, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.npr.org/2026/03/04/nx-s1-5736528/new-information-about-the-bombing-of-a-school-in-iran[/URL]
And that is just in the first week or so of Trump's Iran War..[/QUOTE]But keep publicly rimming the enemies of America.
I don't give a fuck about that school or any other in any other country.
Iran has killed 1000's of Americans its way past time we wipe them out.
Like the axiom kill them all and let god sort them out.
Iran planned and paid for Oct 7.
I didn't hear you whining about it.
"Anti-west Jihadists will never forgive and forget that. Trump thinks he is the King of Retribution? Thanks to him the American people are destined to find out what decades of retribution for shit like that looks and feels like".
I have a better idea, lets just kill them all, Do you think I'm afraid? Lololol.
You also cried and whined when the King of the Universe smoked that ***** named Soleimani.
You say you left USA 15 yrs ago and haven't returned once.
Thank You very much BTW.
And I'm sure you don't because you know you will be thrown in prison for being a traitor.
All they need to do is read your ISG, trying to suck and rim.
Aka publicly giving aid and comfort to our enemies 24/7.
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3055114]Jeeze. This war is so boring. Some dead people, sure. But no real excitement know what I mean? Coupla drones here and there. Bunch of rich idiots trapped in luxury Dubai. Boo hoo! Real sad.
I'm beginning to lose interest. I'm not rock hard anymore.
Call me when there's like actual World War 3 action happening. How is this even 'War', when there's no boots on the ground? The Vietnam days were way more exciting!
With video technology today, you'd think we'd see more explosions up close.
Should I still go to Bangkok? Satan knows I want to. Come on you guys. You idiots voted for orange, why can't he make the war more exciting and entertaining for us to watch then? We're already in a dystopia, let's just go all the way to armageddon baby![/QUOTE]But stupid Trump will at least learn war is not playing golf. And now choosing MMA fighter for his government instead of so shameful woman before. The fall of USA under Trump.
-
2 photos
Uh
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3055317]But keep publicly rimming the enemies of America.
I don't give a fuck about that school or any other in any other country.
Iran has killed 1000's of Americans its way past time we wipe them out.
Like the axiom kill them all and let god sort them out.
Iran planned and paid for Oct 7.
I didn't hear you whining about it..[/QUOTE]Let's take a short stroll through the usual utterly incoherent blithering cognitive impairment of Donald Trump's supposed but obviously total bullshit claim to doing anything at any time for the benefit of America rather than for the benefit of himself and his Trump Crime Family:
[B]United States withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action[/B]
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_withdrawal_from_the_Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action[/URL]
[QUOTE]The Trump administration [b]certified in April 2017 and in July 2017 that Iran was complying with the deal.[/b][/QUOTE][B]Trump said Irans nuclear program was obliterated. So why is he looking to strike again?
Feb. 24, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/24/politics/nuclear-program-iran-trump-strike[/URL]
[B]Pentagon tells Congress no sign that Iran was going to attack US first, sources say.
March 2, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/us/pentagon-tells-congress-no-sign-that-iran-was-going-attack-us-first-sources-say-2026-03-02/[/URL]
In a Just World, everyone who could have but did not vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016 would be arrested, indicted, convicted and sentenced to prison for Negligent, Involuntary Manslaughter for the death of at least a million Americans and millions more around the world from Trump's Pandemic.
But there was nothing merely "negligent" nor "involuntary" about the slaughter of law-abiding Americans and other people around the world thanks anyone who could but did not vote for Kamala Harris in 2024. For that every one of them would be arrested, indicted, convicted and sentenced to either death or life in prison without the possibility of parole for 1st Degree Murder.
-
4 photos
No! Fake News! TDS!
Yes, as predictable as night following day. Again.
Mind you, this was before Trump started the Repub Trump Iran War.
Hey, have you heard how much better Repubs are at handling the economy than Dems? Not sure how anyone could miss it since Mainstream Media has been spinning it that way in the minds of voters for at least 100 years, all through every Great Repub Depression, Great Repub Recession, Massive Historic Repub Jobs Destruction, great Dem economic recovery, great Dem economic expansion and massive historic Dem jobs creation. Hard to miss, really. LOL.
[B]U.S. payrolls unexpectedly fell by 92,000 in February; unemployment rate rises to 4.4%[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/06/february-2026-jobs-report.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Nonfarm payrolls fell by 92,000 for the month, compared to the estimate for 50,000 and below the downwardly revised January total of 126,000. February marked the third time in the past five months that payrolls declined, following a sharp revision showing a drop of 17,000 in December.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3055320]But stupid Trump will at least learn war is not playing golf. And now choosing MMA fighter for his government instead of so shameful woman before. The fall of USA under Trump.[/QUOTE]Funny, big powerful USA needing to ask advices to poor Ukrainians for drones. USA should understand how Putin fail, despite his cruelty, after 4 years.
-
Hello
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3055317]But keep publicly rimming the enemies of America.
I don't give a fuck about that school or any other in any other country.
Iran has killed 1000's of Americans its way past time we wipe them out.
Like the axiom kill them all and let god sort them out.
Iran planned and paid for Oct 7.
I didn't hear you whining about it..[/QUOTE]It's not worth at a billion dollars a day and American soldiers needlessly losing their lives. If it's so important than why don't you go up there and fight? October 7th you say? And Since when is it our business to defend to defend Israel? They are using us to do their dirty work.
-
2 photos
Trump continues to break records
We are sure getting a whole bunch of "This is the worst ever or at least since a previous time a Republican was president" framing in these latest terrible headlines and reports that Mainstream Media love and crave so much they just can't stop helping Repubs win elections so they will oh so reliably continue to provide them:
[B]Oil surges 35% this week for biggest gain in futures trading history[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/06/iran-us-war-oil-prices-brent-wti-barrel-futures.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]U.S. crude soared 35.63% for the biggest weekly gain in the history of the futures contract [b]dating back to 1983.[/b] Brent jumped about 28% for its biggest weekly gain [b]since April 2020.[/b][/QUOTE][B]Dow falls 450 points, posts worst week in nearly a year as oil tops $90, jobs data disappoints[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/05/stock-market-today-live-updates.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Qatars energy minister, Saad al-Kaabi, told the Financial Times that Gulf energy producers may need to call force majeure in the coming days, shutting down production in a move that could send oil to $150 a barrel. The conflict in the Middle East could bring down the economies of the world, he warned.
Im very cautious, said Wharton professor emeritus Jeremy Siegel on CNBCs Closing Bell. If we dont get some breakthrough over the weekend, I think well see $100 oil next week.[/QUOTE]I understand MAGA Bill Maher will launch into a campaign of bothsider / neithersider assurances on his weekly show that "I know Donald very well and if there is anything I know for sure about him it is that he really hates wars, high oil and gas prices and losing jobs in the economy.
Really.
Swear to god.
Besides, everyone knows Republicans are better at handling the economy than. Democrats.
Oh, and Democrats think men can get pregnant, always try to defund the police and lack common sense.
Really.
Swear to god. ".
-
Electrostate vs Petrostate: Is dumbass Petro Wars, only better for Electrostates?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3055032]Yeah, dummy, I live here. For the millionth time, alternatives make sense in places where the wind is blowing and sun is shining. [/QUOTE]LOL! And no doubt for the past 10 years it has [I][b]"made sense"[/b][/I] for Texas to significantly build [U]more solar, wind and battery capacity,[/U] than coal, gas and nuclear combined, over the last 50 years.
Another fun fact, it has been over +30 years, since Texas built a commercial operational nuclear plant [I]...+30 years[/I] and in less than a third of that time, from 20142023, Texas led the [I]U.S.[/I] in both wind and solar growth, with solar capacity growing by over 6,000%.
Wake the fuck-up, dude! Growth in renewables, like the one in Texas, for solar, wind and batteries [I](S+W+B)[/I] aren't just happening, because it only [I][b]"make sense in places where the wind is blowing and sun is shining".[/b][/I] It is happening everywhere, due to the economics that [I]S+W+B[/I] have been the lowest cost of energy.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3055032]Your dumb ass praises Germany for putting up solar in a country with little sun. You keep praising Europe while Europeans are lamenting shutting down nukes. Yeah, the solar in Germany worked so fucking great, they had to hook up to Russian gas, and all their while you dumb Dems are crying, "Why can't we be as smart as Europeans?[/QUOTE]Another classic failure, to understand energy economics, macro energy policies and worldwide geo-political energy trends. Just like your dumbass MAGA Fuhrer!
Yes, thanks to your senile MAGA Fuhrer stooge, being pussy-whipped and now taking his orders from Israeli overlords, is a new fool's low for your MAGA Fuhrer and makes America look like its "the tail" and Israel is "the dog".
Note, something you gullible MAGA suckers, always thought it would be Kamala Harris, that wasn't going to be strong enough to stand up for America. Now we know, the weakling and weak-minded fool, is your MAGA Fuhrer! BTW, VP Harris would never have taken America, into yet another senseless war. Full Stop Period!
Also many thanks your dumbass MAGA Fuhrer, after being subjugated and browbeaten by his dominatrix Bibi, and goaded into another useless war, I am counting on much of the world, outside of those petrostates, to also WAKE UP and go gleefully running into China's arms, for more non-conflict gigawatts of [I]S+W+B[/I] please.
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3055402]It's not worth at a billion dollars a day and American soldiers needlessly losing their lives. If it's so important than why don't you go up there and fight? October 7th you say? And Since when is it our business to defend to defend Israel? They are using us to do their dirty work.[/QUOTE]Your Trump You elected twice is big support for criminal Netanyahou war business and wanted to spend big money to build Gaza beach resort. Such a shame for USA.
-
I think people are getting bored already, I know I am
It's been a week, and nothing really exciting has happened with this war. Hardly any deaths, lawnmower engined powered dinky drones hitting the sides of buildings. Barely any big explosions. No boots on the ground?! What is this dystopian nonsense? Vietnam was way more exciting than this! You kids don't know what real war is. You all voted for orange man, now make him make the war more entertaining please. In the immortal words of Maximus, are you not entertained?
By Satan's ballsack, this so-called war is so dull. Sheesh.
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3055538]It's been a week, and nothing really exciting has happened with this war. Hardly any deaths, lawnmower engined powered dinky drones hitting the sides of buildings. Barely any big explosions. No boots on the ground?! What is this dystopian nonsense? Vietnam was way more exciting than this! You kids don't know what real war is. You all voted for orange man, now make him make the war more entertaining please. In the immortal words of Maximus, are you not entertained?
By Satan's ballsack, this so-called war is so dull. Sheesh.[/QUOTE]Don't you find so exciting already 6 US deaths because of Trump who is a liar, more than supporting criminal Netanyahou, Trump doesn't care about Iranians, but kind of war for energy versus China. USA have master of bullshits and lies.
-
2 photos
Well
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3055538]It's been a week, and nothing really exciting has happened with this war. Hardly any deaths, lawnmower engined powered dinky drones hitting the sides of buildings. Barely any big explosions. No boots on the ground?! What is this dystopian nonsense? Vietnam was way more exciting than this! You kids don't know what real war is. You all voted for orange man, now make him make the war more entertaining please. In the immortal words of Maximus, are you not entertained?
By Satan's ballsack, this so-called war is so dull. Sheesh.[/QUOTE]If 1300+ deaths in just the first week, including 100+ school children slaughtered by Donald Trump on the first day, is boring to you, then you might as well settle in for a long, deadly, very expensive and boring slog of another unprovoked, quagmire, no-win Repub War of aggression and choice, as is strongly suggested by all available evidence and intel, some of the most critical of it fully available to Trump long before he started and plunged America into his Repub Trump Iran War:
[B]Kuwait cuts oil production as Strait of Hormuz closure disrupts energy market[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/07/kuwait-oil-cut-iran-war-strait-hormuz.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Kuwait said it is cutting oil production due to Iranian threats against safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz.
Kuwait is the fifth-largest oil producer in OPEC. It produced approximately 2.6 million barrels per day in January.
Oil prices surged about 35% this week as the Iran war has triggered a major disruption of global energy supplies.[/QUOTE]Now, as regards to the "unconditional surrender" that Trump is demanding of Iran in order to even begin to see an end to this quagmire, no-win, deadly, very expensive and to you boring Repub War, the niggling point of conflicts about that as of this writing is half of Trump's Cabinet and many Repub MAGAs in Congress are denying that what Commander-in-Chief Trump and his Secretary of War Pere KegsBreath keep calling a "War" over and over again in public is really a War.
Ahem.
Therefore, if we are to believe those Repub MAGAs and not Trump and his Secretary of War, then there is no reason for whoever is in charge in Iran to "surrender" to anyone here, there or anywhere else for anything at anytime.
The bigger of the two questions being, "surrender to whom?
[B]Iran vows it won't surrender as war with the U.S. and Israel enters second week[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/07/not-slowing-down-one-week-on-us-israeli-strikes-on-iran-continue.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The war between Iran and the U.S. and Israel entered a second week with Iranian missiles bombarding Gulf states and Israel attacking an oil facility in Tehran.
Iran struck a U.S. air base in the United Arab Emirates, shortly after its president, Masoud Pezeshkian, apologized for attacking its Gulf neighbors.
Vessel traffic came to a near-halt in the Strait of Hormuz, sending oil prices skyrocketing.
Two influential Iranian clerics have called for the swift selection of a new supreme leader, Iranian state media reported.[/QUOTE]And to answer that bigger question referenced above, well, Trump already knew what the latest Intel and research on that question strongly suggested; whoever winds up "surrendering" to whomever in Iran after this quagmire, no-win, Repub War eventually comes to its deadly and very expensive end, if it ever does that is, the "surrender" will very likely be to some of the exact same people with the exact same mindset and ideology, methods and culture as was there the week before Trump started his Repub Trump Iran War:
[B]Intel report warns large-scale war unlikely to oust Irans regime
A classified U.S. report doubts that Irans opposition would take power following either a short or extended U.S. military campaign.[/B]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/03/07/iran-intelligence-report-unlikely-oust-regime/[/URL]
[QUOTE]The report, completed about a week before the United States and Israel initiated the war on Feb. 28, outlined succession scenarios stemming from either a narrowly tailored campaign against Irans leaders or a broader assault against its leadership and government institutions, the people familiar with its findings said. In both cases, the intelligence concluded that Irans clerical and military establishment would respond to the killing of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei by following protocols designed to preserve continuity of power, these people said.[/QUOTE]However, since Trump plunged America into his Iran War in order to pay back Netanyahu for delaying the May 2024 Biden-negotiated ceasefire until after the November 2024 election and thereby better ensure that relatively tiny handful of angry Muslims in the only 3 swing states that mattered would come through with the razor-thin marginal swing of votes necessary to "give Trump the presidency", payback Qatar for that sweet airliner bribe, payback the UAE for that sweet bailout bribe of the Trump Crime Family's failing crypto venture, payback Saudi Arabia for that sweet bribe in the Billions to Trump son-in-law Jared and his lovely bride, Trump's long lusted-after daughter, as a convenient distraction from those increasingly uncomfortable Epstein File revelations, his terrible economic policy results, crashing poll numbers for him and his Party's midterm election prospects and so on and absolutely zero to do with making America safer, Iran's human rights violations or any other high-minded goals, it really doesn't matter to Trump and his MAGAs what happens in Iran or to America as a result of this latest Repub / Trump economic, national security and foreign policy catastrophe.
-
Some have just shameful writings here, when no peace with Trump, but just chaos from his craziness.
-
DJT supercedes Mohammad Yahweh and HayZeus
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3055402]It's not worth at a billion dollars a day and American soldiers needlessly losing their lives. If it's so important than why don't you go up there and fight? October 7th you say? And Since when is it our business to defend to defend Israel? They are using us to do their dirty work.[/QUOTE]I joined the military during the Reagan yrs I was hoping to wipe out the Iranian Death to America chanters, what have you ever contributed to the safety or quality of life of the USA?
I'm probably too old to rejoin the festivities, but my children are welcome to, and if they called me I would happily drop everything to report.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/03/02/us/politics/president-trump-white-house-portraits.html[/URL]
They have been chanting Death to America (ns) for 47 fucking years.
I'm sitting here typing yelling Death to Iran!
-
3 photos
Is that a quote from the NYT article that is blocked?
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3055725]I joined the military during the Reagan yrs I was hoping to wipe out the Iranian Death to America chanters, what have you ever contributed to the safety or quality of life of the USA?
I'm probably too old to rejoin the festivities, but my children are welcome to, and if they called me I would happily drop everything to report.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/03/02/us/politics/president-trump-white-house-portraits.html[/URL]
They have been chanting Death to America (ns) for 47 fucking years.
I'm sitting here typing yelling Death to Iran![/QUOTE]Uh.
Chanting "Death to America", "Bippity Bobbity Boo", "Republicans handle the economy better than Democrats" or anything else for 47 years does not constitute an "imminent threat" worthy of plunging America into still another quagmire, no-win, deadly and very expensive unprovoked Repub War of choice.
Nor does an imminent threat "in the future" make any logical sense.
Nor does "We started a War in order to prevent a War from starting."
Nor does "This War is not really a War but they need to surrender to someone against whom they are not fighting a War anyway. "
MAGALoon Trump, his MAGALoon Secretary of War Pete KegsBreath, the rest of his MAGALoon Cabinet, the MAGALoon Repubs in Congress and their MAGALoon Cult Members are blathering more incoherent gobbledegook about this critically important issue and everything else than Joe Biden has ever supposedly uttered in his lifetime right up to this very day.
[B]Oil surges above $100 a barrel; Trump says 'small price to pay'[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/08/crude-oil-prices-today-iran-war.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
5 months of job losses in just the first 13 months of Trump's 2nd disastrous so-called presidential term puts him well on track to achieving the same result he achieved in his first term; being the only president since Repub Herbert Hoover to leave office with fewer jobs in the economy than when he took office. Eisenhower, GHW Bush and GW Bush tried hard and came close to achieving that long-held Repub Party goal. But DJT is the most beloved of all Repub Party icons because he did achieve that long-held Repub Party goal the first time around and now looks to he heading for a blessed Repub Party Twoffer.
Oh, and now that DJT has brought "Death to" two more Americans after just 10 days of his Iran War, not 47 years, he is talking about putting boots on the ground in Iran despite his promises and assurances that he would never do that.
Thank you for your vote.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3055725]I joined the military during the Reagan yrs I was hoping to wipe out the Iranian Death to America chanters, what have you ever contributed to the safety or quality of life of the USA?
I'm probably too old to rejoin the festivities, but my children are welcome to, and if they called me I would happily drop everything to report.
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/03/02/us/politics/president-trump-white-house-portraits.html[/URL]
They have been chanting Death to America (ns) for 47 fucking years.
I'm sitting here typing yelling Death to Iran![/QUOTE]I'm sure you will thank so much your Trump, if your children or family are killed in Iran war, like already 6 US. When Netanyahou is in war crimes supported by your Trump, in Gaza they destroyed, killing children and women, and now Lebanon and intoxicating Iranians, total failure, after Ukraine, for Trump about what he told to be re elected, no peace, no MAGA, but wars and deaths everywhere, dangerous senile Trump is just able for chaos US citizens will pay, first with inflation and lost jobs. Israel should get rid of criminal Netanyahou, USA should get rid of Trump in November after his real failure since 2 years, but only bullshiting like senile every day. If Russians were able to wake up and get rid of criminal dictator Putin, then our world and planet could improve, when impossible with crazy like Trump, making wars business rather than peace, making more pollution.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3055456]Wake the fuck-up, dude! Growth in renewables, like the one in Texas, for solar, wind and batteries aren't just happening, because it only "make sense in places where the wind is blowing and sun is shining".It is happening everywhere, due to the economics that have been the lowest cost of energy. Yes, thanks to your senile MAGA Fuhrer stooge, being pussy-whipped and now taking his orders from Israeli overlords, is a new fool's low for your MAGA Fuhrer and makes America look like its "the tail" and Israel is "the dog".[/QUOTE]So the future is putting up solar panels in places where the sun does not shine, and the reason I do not understand that sentiment is that I voted for Trump. Then there is this trash about Trump and Israel that I fail to see has anything to do with energy. So this is textbook TDS.
The only question I have left to ask Spidy is what drugs are you taking and how much do I have to take to understand your POV?
-
Oil barrel reach 115 USD today, 50% increasing in 1 week, oil crisis starting, because of crazy Trump who gives big money to Putin for his war. 0 result for peace, but helping Russia, making war with Venezuela, Iran, supporting for Gaza and Lebanon, trying with Greenland. Master liar. How USA could keep such liar fucking US citizens. As blind as Russians, when not much more democracy.
-
The Cycle
I'm tired of Republicans coming into office and tanking the economy and starting wars only to leave the mess to Democrats to clean up! Then the electorate gets impatient or has amnesia or something and falls for yet another GOP divisive culture war and votes the assholes in again, starting yet another downward spiral. And so the cycle goes. When the hell are people going to learn? And here we go again!
-
3 photos
Another Trump record for MAGAs who blamed Biden for high oil prices
Looks like Repub Trump has just broken Repub Eisenhower's long-held record for presiding over the greatest oil supply disruption in history. And in a big, BIG way!
USA! USA! USA!
[B]The U.S.-Iran war is the biggest oil supply disruption in history[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/09/the-us-iran-war-is-the-biggest-oil-supply-disruption-in-history.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The Strait of Hormuz closure has caused the biggest oil supply disruption in history, according to Rapidan Energy.
About 20% of global supply has been disrupted for nine days, [b]more than double the previous record set during the Suez crisis of 1956.[/b]
There is virtually no spare capacity to address the problem because Saudi Arabia and the UAE are cut off from the global oil market, Rapidan said.[/QUOTE]
-
Still dull
History will tell you just how fast WW1 exploded. Some archduke dude gets killed, and bam! WW1 ignites, it's exciting as hell. WW2, Poland gets invaded and bam! The world explodes in furious war.
Fucking 9 days and we're still not in WW3? What is this bullshit?
Coupla dinky drones hitting the sides of buildings, and then what? Nothing.
You idiots voted for the orange man. You wanted this. So make it entertaining at least! I remember Vietnam, now that was actual War! Not this cowering behind bullshit drones nonsense. Jeeze.
What a bunch of pussies. This is probably what young people these days think war is. It ain't no video games folks. This shit is real.
And what are the GCC countries waiting for? All talk, no game.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;3055809]I'm tired of Republicans coming into office and tanking the economy and starting wars only to leave the mess to Democrats to clean up! Then the electorate gets impatient or has amnesia or something and falls for yet another GOP divisive culture war and votes the assholes in again, starting yet another downward spiral. And so the cycle goes. When the hell are people going to learn? And here we go again![/QUOTE]I can't understand how Trump could be re elected, when everybody know he is such liar, master of daily bullshiting. Incredible, people trust him, they may enjoy to be deeply fucked in ass and pay for. Old Trump will learn what is war with many deaths for USA. In November, would not be normal not to kick him off, when that s enough, our world don t need a senile crazy with ignorance.
-
3 photos
A 100 year long pattern isn't enough to convince some people
[QUOTE=TheCane;3055809][B]The Cycle[/b]
I'm tired of Republicans coming into office and tanking the economy and starting wars only to leave the mess to Democrats to clean up! Then the electorate gets impatient or has amnesia or something and falls for yet another GOP divisive culture war and votes the assholes in again, starting yet another downward spiral. And so the cycle goes. When the hell are people going to learn? And here we go again![/QUOTE]That cycle has only been happening for about 100 years and many in the American Electorate, oh I'd say about 49% of them, are just verrrry sllllloooow to catch on.
Besides, Haitians were eating the dogs and eating the cats!
Didn't you care about those poor widow puppies and kitties??
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3055826]History will tell you just how fast WW1 exploded. Some archduke dude gets killed, and bam! WW1 ignites, it's exciting as hell. WW2, Poland gets invaded and bam! The world explodes in furious war.
Fucking 9 days and we're still not in WW3? What is this bullshit?
Coupla dinky drones hitting the sides of buildings, and then what? Nothing.
You idiots voted for the orange man. You wanted this. So make it entertaining at least! I remember Vietnam, now that was actual War! Not this cowering behind bullshit drones nonsense. Jeeze.
What a bunch of pussies. This is probably what young people these days think war is. It ain't no video games folks. This shit is real..[/QUOTE]Vietnam where USA lost war. Fool idiot Trump doesn't know what is a war versus martyrs who are ready and not afraid to die.
-
1 photos
He's warning you and all the other America haters
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3055842]That cycle has only been happening for about 100 years and many in the American Electorate, oh I'd say about 49% of them, are just verrrry sllllloooow to catch on.
Besides, Haitians were eating the dogs and eating the cats!
Didn't you care about those poor widow puppies and kitties??[/QUOTE]He's warning you and all the other America haters.
-
3 photos
Well
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3055826]History will tell you just how fast WW1 exploded. Some archduke dude gets killed, and bam! WW1 ignites, it's exciting as hell. WW2, Poland gets invaded and bam! The world explodes in furious war.
Fucking 9 days and we're still not in WW3? What is this bullshit?
Coupla dinky drones hitting the sides of buildings, and then what? Nothing.
You idiots voted for the orange man. You wanted this. So make it entertaining at least! I remember Vietnam, now that was actual War! Not this cowering behind bullshit drones nonsense. Jeeze.
What a bunch of pussies. This is probably what young people these days think war is. It ain't no video games folks. This shit is real..[/QUOTE]The USA didn't enter WWII until the last month of 1941, long after it was already raging throughout Europe and Asia.
The official beginning of Eisenhower's Vietnam War was November 1, 1955, about a year after Eisenhower replaced the retreating French with USA military personnel and he launched into the next several years of totally committing the USA militarily to that War by word, deed and Treaty, body bags of USA soldiers being returned to the USA all through the second half of those Happy Days. But typically pro Repub Mainstream Media barely reported on it until that quagmire, no-win Repub War finally reached a point where an inevitable incident captured their attention, a subsequent president or two or three had no choice but to expand Eisenhower's War to prevent those Dominoes Eisenhower sold the world on, and that's when they woke up you and most other Americans to the reality of it.
There is still plenty of time for Repub Trump to put enough USA lives in harms way, as Repub Eisenhower did for years before the Gulf of Tonkin incident finally tipped it over, and for somebody to respond to his slaughter of those 150+ school children and 1000+ others the way he is hoping they will in order to force him or perhaps even the next president to put all the USA boots on the ground for as many years or decades of the kind of bigtime "Death to America" excitement you crave. Trumpian / MAGA Cult Members on Fux News are certainly doing their part to get us there.
-
The Enemy
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3055864]Vietnam where USA lost war. Fool idiot Trump doesn't know what is a war versus martyrs who are ready and not afraid to die.[/QUOTE]As a Vietnam veteran friend of mine once said an enemy that is well-armed, ready to die, and in great numbers is a formidable enemy indeed.
-
One more shame on USA, killing 150 Iranian little girls at school. For sure their efficient AI told them they were terrorists. When already almost sure he is a sexual criminal, but now senile fool idiot fat Trump is also a war criminal. Forget Nobel award. He is now on same level than his friends Netanyahou and Putin. Where is MAGA? I don t see, but just a shameful country under Trump they re elected, so they must really follow his craziness, if they have few neurons working to be able to understand, but I m not sure highest cleverness is in USA.
-
Not ww3!
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3055826]History will tell you just how fast WW1 exploded. Some archduke dude gets killed, and bam! WW1 ignites, it's exciting as hell. WW2, Poland gets invaded and bam! The world explodes in furious war.
Fucking 9 days and we're still not in WW3? What is this bullshit?
Coupla dinky drones hitting the sides of buildings, and then what? Nothing.
You idiots voted for the orange man. You wanted this. So make it entertaining at least! I remember Vietnam, now that was actual War! Not this cowering behind bullshit drones nonsense. Jeeze.
What a bunch of pussies. This is probably what young people these days think war is. It ain't no video games folks. This shit is real.
And what are the GCC countries waiting for? All talk, no game.[/QUOTE]I agree this shit isn't a war! Why the fuck are China and Russia on the sidelines not attacking the orange piece of shit!
-
2 photos
But but but
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3055865]He's warning you and all the other America haters.[/QUOTE]Then why has Trump survived 5 full years after his disastrous decisions in his 1st term mass murdered a million Americans?
KegsBreath is just another tough-talking drunk.
LOL. Haven't those incoherent Trumpsters realized that every time they crow about how easy it is for America to bomb, attack or kidnap leaders of other countries due to the "unrivaled power, force, superiority and majesty" of the USA military they are proving the point of anyone smart enough not to use that power, force and majesty to attack these sitting duck countries like Iran and Venezuela?
Duh.
No kidding?
Gee, only everyone on Earth knew that about the USA military already. Has anyone in any previous administration ever doubted that we could bomb, attack and win a War against Iran or Venezuela? Lolol.
That's why Obama and Biden were never shaking in their boots over every stupid thing a Supreme Leader said or did. Bombing and attacking other countries is nothing for the USA. Especially since Obama and Biden were strong enough to get us the fuck out of every quagmire, no-win, Repub War on the Planet in order to free them up to swoop in and kidnap any world leader that a commander-in-chief with nothing else to do with his military toys might want to do. That was never in question, you MAGA numbskulls.
The real problem is what will the American civilians and taxpayers do for the next few generations after some numbskull president and SOW figures the only way to keep themselves from shaking in their boits with fear over every stupid thing somebody in another country says is to shed other Americans' blood and spend other Americans' Trillions to help them sleep better at night.
BTW, when are Barron and Melania going to take one of those very safe boating "excursions" through the Strait of Hormuz thatTrump, KegsBreath and all the MAGAs on Fux News are telling us anybody with guts would take this very day?
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;3055914]As a Vietnam veteran friend of mine once said an enemy that is well-armed, ready to die, and in great numbers is a formidable enemy indeed.[/QUOTE]I don't support them, when I hate religions and mine, but Mollahs are proud to die as martyrs, so they won t give up. When they are killed, new ones grow to celebrate martyrs. Trump is not clever enough to understand this. Only population could kick them out, but many citizens would die and not sure they would not return. Netanyahou makes wars with everybody, when he knows he is supported by Trump and to avoid Israelian justice. Vietnam couldn't compete for weapons with USA, but, same like Ukraine, they fought for few they have, and defeated big powerful USA. USA now led by a fool idiot, not helping to succeed.
-
[QUOTE=EnterTheV;3055967]I agree this shit isn't a war! Why the fuck are China and Russia on the sidelines not attacking the orange piece of shit![/QUOTE]Putin attacked Ukraine and must be happy to get money from Trump. Trump suck him and give him big money with oil increasing. China make economics war, they are now above USA of Trump.
-
I can already see people are bored with this so called war
The first coupla days, it was wall to wall coverage on every major news outlet, now it's like a few minutes here and there. No one cares anymore.
The only way to get anyone to care about this again is if it becomes an actual 'WAR'! Like the way Vietnam went. Now that was some real action!
I wish I was in Thailand now. It's been a while since I got myself any poon. WW3 and the end of the world would help me to forget how shitty my life is.
Remember the famous quote from Abraham Lincoln: "The only way to feel better about your life, is if other people have it way worse than you".
So I do appreciate this damp squib of a 'war' for making me kinda grateful-ish that I'm not living in a war zone, I guess. Just wish I was dead though. Satan knows I've lived long enough.
Life sucks.
-
Except Americans, others don t trust idiot, always bullshiting Trump for their safety in Ormuz pass. The American idiot is destroying Teheran, but not Mollahs, when he killed more than 150 young girls, same like criminal Netanyahou destroyed Gaza with women and children, and now Lebanon. 2 war criminals.
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3056156]The first coupla days, it was wall to wall coverage on every major news outlet, now it's like a few minutes here and there. No one cares anymore.
The only way to get anyone to care about this again is if it becomes an actual 'WAR'! Like the way Vietnam went. Now that was some real action!
I wish I was in Thailand now. It's been a while since I got myself any poon. WW3 and the end of the world would help me to forget how shitty my life is.
Remember the famous quote from Abraham Lincoln: "The only way to feel better about your life, is if other people have it way worse than you".
So I do appreciate this damp squib of a 'war' for making me kinda grateful-ish that I'm not living in a war zone, I guess..[/QUOTE]Tell 150 young girls parents and jump from a bridge.
-
American idiot
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3056158]Except Americans, others don t trust idiot, always bullshiting Trump for their safety in Ormuz pass. The American idiot is destroying Teheran, but not Mollahs, when he killed more than 150 young girls, same like criminal Netanyahou destroyed Gaza with women and children, and now Lebanon. 2 war criminals.[/QUOTE]Idiot Trump who doesn't know what is war, spend a lot of money, billions USD each day, but Mollahs are blocking worldwide economics. This war, once again, is really not a success for USA, but oil rate exploding, making big inflation, because of USA led by a senile idiot. If he could disappear from our world, even Putin should be really happy to receive so big money from USA, when only way to stop Putin is not the old orange DT BJ swallowing him, but to make Russia broke, not to be able anymore to pay to keep on war.
-
Way Past Time to Prosecute the Rigging of 2020
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3055981]Then why has Trump survived 5 full years after his disastrous decisions in his 1st term mass murdered a million Americans?
KegsBreath is just another tough-talking drunk.
LOL. Haven't those incoherent Trumpsters realized that every time they crow about how easy it is for America to bomb, attack or kidnap leaders of other countries due to the "unrivaled power, force, superiority and majesty" of the USA military they are proving the point of anyone smart enough not to use that power, force and majesty to attack these sitting duck countries like Iran and Venezuela?[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.amazon.com/-/es/Rigged-Media-Democrats-Seized-Elections/dp/B09PMHYVQ4[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/elections/100000010766599/trump-false-claim-election-stolen-impact-2026-midterms.html?smid=url-share[/URL]
The shithole blue cities of Milwaukee Detroit Atlanta and Philadelphia stuffed the boxes with bogus mail-in ballots to swing the Electoral College to Scumbag Joe.
I believe all it took was 150000 rigged mail-in ballots, I'm sure I could fit those in 1 large suitcase.
-
4 photos
Oh, if only
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3056289][URL]https://www.amazon.com/-/es/Rigged-Media-Democrats-Seized-Elections/dp/B09PMHYVQ4[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/elections/100000010766599/trump-false-claim-election-stolen-impact-2026-midterms.html?smid=url-share[/URL]
The shithole blue cities of Milwaukee Detroit Atlanta and Philadelphia stuffed the boxes with bogus mail-in ballots to swing the Electoral College to Scumbag Joe.
I believe all it took was 150000 rigged mail-in ballots, I'm sure I could fit those in 1 large suitcase.[/QUOTE]Why oh why couldn't the Dems have come up with these brilliantly effective yet also brilliantly invisible to virtually all investigative and legal scrutiny eyes and ears means of "rigging" the elections in 2000,2004, 2016 and 2024? Why only 2020, long after so much Repub damage had been done and right as the most Repub damage in history was about to be done?
Imagine an America with no Repub / GW Bush First Recession, no Repub / GW Bush Attack on 9/11, no Repub / GW Bush quagmire, no-win Wars based on Repub lies in Iraq and Afghanistan, no Repub / GW Bush 2nd and Great Recession, no Repub / GW Bush bear market crashes, both of them, no Repub / Trump TCJA that flushed $ Trillions down a deficit shithole only to produce a million fewer jobs with it than without it, no first Repub / Trump disastrously failed trade war with China that plunged American Agriculture and Manufacturing industries into Recession so deep Trump had to add $Billions more to his deficits by issuing them emergency welfare checks just to keep them afloat, no Repub / Trump bear market crashes, both of them, no Trump's Pandemic and the millions of deaths, worldwide economic destruction, global supply-chain collapse, the millions and millions of lost jobs, closed business, closed schools, travel and recreation venue closures, the historic decline in the quality of international mongering forever, the global hyper-inflation that unavoidably followed, no Repub / Trump leading his mob of cop-killing, America-hating Insurrectionists into bloody battle on American soil to wage Trump's War Against America, overthrow American democracy and assassinate a few duly-elected officials along the way, no higher prices for virtually everything due to Repub / Trump's second failed trade war with everyone, no historically high Taxes imposed on the American Consumer from his Liberation Day Tariffs, no Repub / Trump quagmire, no-win American War in Iran, no skyrocketing gas and food prices and on and on and on.
I mean, it's great that the Dems supposedly 'rigged" the 2020 election so Biden-Harris could produce a historic and Envy of the World Economy and Recovery from the deadly and financial ravages of Trump's 1st term.
But, damn, America and the rest of the World sure would have benefitted immeasurably if only the Dems had "rigged" those other critical elections too.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;3055914]As a Vietnam veteran friend of mine once said an enemy that is well-armed, ready to die, and in great numbers is a formidable enemy indeed.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLTN-6P8HuY[/URL]
Iranians do the 'Trump dance' to YMCA to thank the president for killing Ayatollah Khamenei.
And they are ready to die for the Ayatollahs? You have a terminal case of TDS, Cane.
Oh, but Elvis, you and the MAGA folks are hive minds totally in sync with Trump. Uh, wrong. I do not like what Trump is doing in Iran. I think he had this great plan with Venezuela and Maduro and thought "I can do the same thing in Iran", and the situation there is much trickier. However, it could work out. The other Persian Gulf Arab countries have a much different attitude than before.
Still, I am willing to wait before making any final judgments whereas you and the Trump TDS brigades will criticize anything Trump does. He could cure cancer and you all would find something to complain about. Anyone who was pro-Maduro, and some of you dumb Dems actually did not want him removed, is sick in the head.
-
3 photos
Yep
As predictable as night following day, a Repub in the White House will always find a way to turn the USA economy to shit:
[B]Fourth-quarter GDP revised down to just 0.7% growth; January core inflation was 3.1%[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/13/fourth-quarter-gdp-revised-down-to-just-0point7percent-growth-january-core-inflation-was-3point1percent.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]GDP rose at a seasonally and inflation-adjusted annual rate of just 0.7% in the fourth quarter, according to a Commerce Department revision Friday.
The first revision of the GDP reading was a sharp step down from the previous estimate of 1.4% and well below the Dow Jones consensus forecast for 1.5%.
The core PCE inflation rose 0.4% in January and 3.1% on a 12-month basis. The ex-food and energy reading was 0.1 percentage point higher than December.
..........
[B]For the full year, GDP posted a 2.1% increase, or one-tenth of a percentage point lower than the previous reading. In 2024, the economy rose at a 2.8% pace.[/b][/QUOTE]Oh, BTW, for any Trumpian / MAGA Cult Members with True TDS who are worried about how the sane World might react if Trump cures cancer, you can relax in the knowledge that Trump will never cure cancer or any other disease since he and his fellow Repubs work very hard to defund cancer research.
Just sayin'.
[B]Trump administration health research cuts total $1.8 billion, analysis finds[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/trump-administration-health-research-cuts-total-18-billion-analysis-finds-2025-05-08/[/URL]
[B]'A Devastating Setback Funding for Childhood Cancer Research Cut From U.S. Spending Bill[/B]
[URL]https://www.pcrf-kids.org/2024/12/31/a-heartbreaking-outcome-funding-for-childhood-cancer-research-cut-from-u-s-spending-bill/[/URL]
-
Ok
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3056376]As predictable as night following day, a Repub in the White House will always find a way to turn the USA economy to shit:
[B]Fourth-quarter GDP revised down to just 0.7% growth; January core inflation was 3.1%[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/13/fourth-quarter-gdp-revised-down-to-just-0point7percent-growth-january-core-inflation-was-3point1percent.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
Oh, BTW, for any Trumpian / MAGA Cult Members with True TDS who are worried about how the sane World might react if Trump cures cancer, you can relax in the knowledge that Trump will never cure cancer or any other disease since he and his fellow Repubs work very hard to defund cancer research.
Just sayin'.[/QUOTE]Wait until those fuel prices kick in. We're stuck now!
-
Apparently the sun don't shine in Petrostate World? And the wind don't blow?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3055749] So the future is putting up solar panels in places [b]where the sun does not shine,[/b] and the reason I do not understand that sentiment is that I voted for Trump. Then there is this trash about Trump and Israel that I fail to see has anything to do with energy. So this is textbook TDS. [/QUOTE]LOL! Sure dude, as you are a vetern MAGA lundite, [NOPARSE]I'll wait...whilst you, Elvis 2008, "has a think" and tells the [/NOPARSE] world, [I][b]"where the sun does not shine",[/b][/I] and thus not allowing you to use solar panels?
[B]Why solar panels are still a smart investment, even in less sunny climates[/B], January 9, 2025. [URL]https://solarascent.ca/2025/01/09/why-solar-panels-are-still-a-smart-investment-even-in-less-sunny-climates[/URL].
[B]Photovoltaics and Energy Security in the Greater Arctic Region,[/B] for PV deployment above 60°and latitude, concludes that, with climate-adapted engineering and robust performance analysis, PV can make a meaningful contribution to Arctic energy systems. [URL]https://iea-pvps.org/key-topics/t13-security-greater-arctic-region-2026/[/URL].
Let me [NOPARSE]also hazard a guess, that in this imaginary MAGA world-view place of yours, where the sun don't shine...does the wind also not blow as [/NOPARSE]well?
-
Electrostate vs Petrostate: Grid Solar, Wind and Batteries, digial dovetail with AI
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054]Hot damn, an energy discussion! ... And extremely expensive more than 6 hours out. Please note on an average day with good weather you can only get meaningful solar generation for about 4 to 6 hours. For wind the average is 6 to 10 hours a day.[/QUOTE]With the renewables [I](S+W+B) energy era, [/I] flying at warp speed and dominating the energy revolution transition, and the ever increasing synergies with their digitized electrical tech energy capabilities, are far and away greater than fossil fossil, [I][b]at integrating and dovetailing perfectly with the advances in AI energy digital modelling[/b][/I] and are innovating and doing more with less.
Envision Energy and their EnOS AI-powered software, provides advanced liquid-cooled BESS and smart software to enhance safety, efficiency, and energy density. They also claim EnOS AI-software, is able to extend battery duration, doubling duration in many cases.
Watch this space!
P. S. Is 2026 the year of the battery?
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3056465]LOL! Sure dude, as you are a vetern MAGA lundite[/QUOTE]It just blows me away that you think that you are smart solely on the basis of who you voted for while voting for the guy with dementia and an alcoholic airhead who was picked by the elites and literally sucked her way to the top.
But no, you continue your stupid ways with an article that states, In fact, Germany—a global leader in solar energy—has far fewer sunny days than Halifax and still reaps the rewards of solar power!
Germany is in fact the prime example of stupidly shoving alternative energy down the throats of their citizens. They are a textbook failure with alternative energy.
Still just when I think you cannot be more dumb, you bring up solar power in the Arctic. Why, yes, it would be great to have power generated for the months the sun is shining day and night.
As for the winter months, well, you can live by example. Get your ass off the beach in Brazil. Grab yourself some solar panels and electrical heaters and move to Alaska in December while using no fossil fuels and let us know how it goes. It is put up or shut up time.
-
Why no footage eh?
Something's really fishy. Why isn't Dubai, or Doha, or Saudi, or Manamana show any footage of explosions and shit? It's not like them to hide stuff. This is really weird dudes. Something's off here. We're even getting footage of bombs going off in Iran, but not in them other Ayrab places? This can only mean one thing. That they're NOT being bombed! What the hell is going on? What's the actual truth?
Are there dead people or not?
This "war" has been incredibly frustrating and dull. No wonder those rich comedians went to the Riyadh comedy festival.
There's nothing but good news coming out of Dubai, it's business as usual apparently. Is any of this stuff actually happening then? Why can't we get actual information from anyone anymore?
Fucking Christ on a stick.
Start WW3 already!
-
1 photos
Check your browser
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3056547]Something's really fishy. Why isn't Dubai, or Doha, or Saudi, or Manamana show any footage of explosions and shit? It's not like them to hide stuff. This is really weird dudes. Something's off here. We're even getting footage of bombs going off in Iran, but not in them other Ayrab places? This can only mean one thing. That they're NOT being bombed! What the hell is going on? What's the actual truth?
Are there dead people or not?
This "war" has been incredibly frustrating and dull. No wonder those rich comedians went to the Riyadh comedy festival.
There's nothing but good news coming out of Dubai, it's business as usual apparently. Is any of this stuff actually happening then? Why can't we get actual information from anyone anymore?
Fucking Christ on a stick.
Start WW3 already![/QUOTE]Maybe there is something wrong with your Search function:
[URL]https://www.timesofisrael.com/dubais-carefully-built-image-as-a-sun-filled-safe-haven-shattered-by-iranian-strikes/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/world/middle-east/iran-israel-us-strikes-dubai-middle-east-air-passengers-stranded-rcna261272[/URL]
[URL]https://youtu.be/_blpFAqIAMM?si=RqF1uqu9_1T99cjA[/URL]
[URL]https://youtu.be/BMD3uMRrDf0?si=R3TX9HI1nOEtL04g[/URL]
There appears to be very little elbo room for or interest in dancing in this much, much bigger gathering of demonstrators in Iran:
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3056289]The shithole blue cities of Milwaukee Detroit Atlanta and Philadelphia stuffed the boxes with bogus mail-in ballots to swing the Electoral College to Scumbag Joe.
I believe all it took was 150000 rigged mail-in ballots, I'm sure I could fit those in 1 large suitcase.[/QUOTE]And yet Trump Attorney General Bill Barr said the claims of election fraud were investigated and they found nothing that would have changed the result in any state.
[URL]https://apnews.com/article/barr-no-widespread-election-fraud-b1f1488796c9a98c4b1a9061a6c7f49d[/URL]#.
-
Lolol LMFAO
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3056587]Maybe there is something wrong with your Search function:
[URL]https://www.timesofisrael.com/dubais-carefully-built-image-as-a-sun-filled-safe-haven-shattered-by-iranian-strikes/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/world/middle-east/iran-israel-us-strikes-dubai-middle-east-air-passengers-stranded-rcna261272[/URL]
[URL]https://youtu.be/_blpFAqIAMM?si=RqF1uqu9_1T99cjA[/URL]
[URL]https://youtu.be/BMD3uMRrDf0?si=R3TX9HI1nOEtL04g[/URL]
There appears to be very little elbo room for or interest in dancing in this much, much bigger gathering of demonstrators in Iran:[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWDfTY8vZ90[/URL]
[URL]https://x.com/cbschicago/status/2033228093343604801[/URL]
-
Point being, on Earth #1, the sun still shine everywhere and the wind still blows
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3056487]But no, you continue your stupid ways with an article that states, In fact, Germany -a global leader in solar energy -has far fewer sunny days than Halifax and still reaps the rewards of solar power! [/QUOTE]LOL! Yeah, for a few less days, but nonetheless, the sun still shines!
Don't forget to read the study that unequivocally states, and reminds the luddites, solar panels still generate energy, even on cloudy days, when the sun isn't shinning.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3055749] So the future is putting up solar panels in places [b]where the sun does not shine ... [/b][/QUOTE]While the sun don't shine and the wind don't blow in MAGA World on Earth #2, rest assured on Earth #1, [B]88% of the worlds population and the global south,[/B] live in some of the sunniest places on the earth.
And yet the other 12%, in the global north, that don't get as much sunshine, are still installing solar panels at an increase rate, as communities look to decrease their carbon foot print and reduce energy costs.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3055749]Grab yourself some solar panels and electrical heaters and move to Alaska in December while using no fossil fuels and let us know how it goes. [/QUOTE][B]New report offers insights into the future of community solar in Alaska,[/B] Dec. 18,2024 "Community solar has a great potential to [U]reduce energy cost[/U] for Alaskans," [URL]New report offers insights into the future of community solar in Alaska[/URL] currently with enough solar installed to power 4,473 homes and growing [URL]https://seia.org/state-solar-policy/alaska-solar/[/URL]
Seems solar panels work just fine in Alaska, even with fewer sunny days! To bad the sun don't shine everywhere on MAGA World Earth #2!
-
Sorry to sound repeatative, but 'Check Your Browser' too dude
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3055749] Then there is this trash about Trump and Israel that I fail to see has anything to do with energy. So this is textbook TDS.[/QUOTE]LOL! You can't be that [I]MAGA blind...can you?[/I] Or does your browser and search functions also not work?
Really, you [B]"fail to see",[/B] any connections between the Bonkers Bibi and your MAGA Fuhrer's dumbass gulf-war, [B]"has anything to do with energy"?[/B].
AS if, the recent headlines indicating the energy volatility, shortage in supply and the spike in fossil fuel energy prices and markets, due to their boneheaded dumbass gulf-war, wasn't a big enough clue?
AS if, the tens of thousands Iranians, the 150 dead Iranian school girls and the more than 50+ Americans killed (more than the 8 reported) and the blowing up of oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, wasn't a big enough clue for you?
AS if, Tweedledum and Tweedledee dragging 14 more nation states into their dumbass gulf-war with Iran, as gasoline prices shot up, to over $5. 30 per gallon (in some places) the highest levels in either of your MAGA Fuhrer's incompetence terms, wasn't a big enough clue for you?
Are you seriously telling me [I][b]you "fail" to see the connection,[/b][/I] this latest gulf-war has with energy, that Tweedledum and Tweedledee started? So if checking your browser doesn't work, then may I suggest seeking stronger help, whatever that may be?
[B]P.S. :[/B]BTW, the gulf-war that Tweedledum and Tweedledee started, [I][b]is [u]the biggest boost[/u] for global decarbonization of fossil fuels,[/b][/I] for China and electrostates, we've seen thus far.
-
3 photos
Omg
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3056750][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWDfTY8vZ90[/URL]
[URL]https://x.com/cbschicago/status/2033228093343604801[/URL][/QUOTE]MAGA Bill Maher's audience "didn't see that coming"? LOL. Then they haven't been paying much attention to his show since at least the year 2000. MAGA Bill loves Trump. So he knows a few Iranian-Americans in Hollywood who are happy that Trump plunged America into another Repub quagmire, no-win War in Iran as payback for the huge personal bribes and favors he got from Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Netanyahu only to trade one hardline 86 year old and dying Supreme Leader for an even more hardline 56 year old Supreme Leader.
Remember how Trump boasted that he could shoot somebody on 5th Avenue and not lose the devotion and fidelity of even one of his Trumpian / MAGA Cult members?
Trump's Cult is only about 11 years old.
The Islamic Revolution Cult goes back to 1953. They have been doing for 73 years what Trump has only been doing for 11 years.
There are millions more current Iran regime blind followers than the handful of Iranian-Americans MAGA Bill has ever met who are delighted by Trump's Iran War. If any.
I suspect MAGA Bill has met about as many of those as the Dem leaders he's met who think men can get pregnant, that children ought to get sex change operations and that the police should be defunded. Which is zero.
-
Miriam Adelson
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3056850]MAGA Bill Maher's audience "didn't see that coming"? LOL. Then they haven't been paying much attention to his show since at least the year 2000. MAGA Bill loves Trump. [b]So he knows a few Iranian-Americans in Hollywood who are happy that Trump plunged America into another Repub quagmire, no-win War in Iran as payback for the [u]huge personal bribes and favors[/u] he got from Qatar, the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Netanyahu[/b] only to trade one hardline 86 year old and dying Supreme Leader for an even more hardline 56 year old Supreme Leader.
Remember how Trump boasted that he could shoot somebody on 5th Avenue and not lose the devotion and fidelity of even one of his Trumpian / MAGA Cult members?
Trump's Cult is only about 11 years old.
The Islamic Revolution Cult goes back to 1953. They have been doing for 73 years what Trump has only been doing for 11 years.[/QUOTE]Yes, you highlight a good topic of conversation, when it comes to any of the stupefying reasons, why the MAGA Fuhrer, illegally attacked Iran. Add Miriam Adelson (among others), to the list and things start to look a little clearer.
Campaign contributions, to the MAGA Fuhrer and various right-wing conservative PACs, totaling $430 million, in 2024 from Miriam Adelson, a known Israel / Netanyahu proxy, according to modicum of political pundits, in coordination with Netanyahu and Israel, has easily bought the newly for sale WH, the always self-serving transactional MAGA Fuhrer and [I][b]purchased an entire wing of American Foreign policy,[/b][/I] on an unprecedented level.
Does begs the question, what American Foreign policy favors were purchased?
[B]Dallas Mavericks owner Miriam Adelson urges Trump to run for third term.[/B] "Adelson whispered something to Trump, who announced that she pledged to donate [I]another $250 million if he runs. [/I]", December 18,2025. [URL]https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/sports/dallas-mavericks/dallas-mavericks-owner-miriam-adelson-urges-trump-to-run-for-third-term/3958248/[/URL]
[I]Hmmmmmm...[/I]makes you wonder if the MAGA Fuhrer, is trying to collect on that Adelson $250 million "3rd term" money, as they both snub their noses, at the rule of law and the constitution, with the lives of American soldiers and the tens of thousand Iranians and the 150 Iranian dead school girls?
-
3 photos
Russia Russia Russia and China loves them some MAGAs!
As was easily predictable by every American smart and patriotic enough to have voted for Clinton in 2016, Biden in 2020 and Harris in 2024, nobody has been better for Russia Russia Russia and China and worse for America than Donald J. Trump.
Nobody.
[B]There are two winners in Iran. Neither one is America.
Oil disruption benefits Russia, as does less U.S. aid for Ukraine. And Iran distracts from China.
March 9, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/03/09/us-iran-russia-china-cost/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Russia is already benefitting from the Iran war. The rise in oil prices (over $100 a barrel on Sunday from $73 a barrel on the eve of war) and Trumps decision to relax sanctions on India for buying Russian oil will help bankroll the Russian war machine. The U.S. is also rapidly burning through limited stockpiles of missiles, especially air-defense interceptors, that are badly needed in Ukraine. President Volodymyr Zelensky has said more Patriot missiles were expended in just three days of fighting with Iran than have been used by Ukraine since 2022. Imagine how much Ukrainian energy infrastructure and how many Ukrainian civilians might have survived the winter if Trump had sent more Patriots to Ukraine rather than to what one journalist dubbed a war of whim with Iran.
..........
While Trump has been bombing various countries, imposing tariffs, discouraging foreign students from coming to America and cutting research funding, China has been making massive investments designed to dominate the industries of the future.
..........
China is also charging ahead in military power. The Pentagon reports that Beijing continues to make steady progress toward Xi Jinpings goal of being able to fight and win a war on Taiwan by the end of 2027. China has the worlds largest navy and is rapidly expanding its ballistic missile and nuclear forces. China is even challenging Americas undersea dominance by building submarines that can launch nuclear strikes from close to the U.S. mainland.[/QUOTE]Dear MAGAs,
Thank you for your vote.
Sincerely and Love You Forever.
Vladimir and Xi.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3056924]As was easily predictable by every American smart and patriotic enough to have voted for Clinton in 2016, Biden in 2020 and Harris in 2024, nobody has been better for Russia Russia Russia and China and worse for America than Donald J. Trump.
Nobody.
[B]There are two winners in Iran. Neither one is America.
Oil disruption benefits Russia, as does less U.S. aid for Ukraine. And Iran distracts from China.
March 9, 2026[/B].[/QUOTE]Yes, Trump help Putin to get money for his war attacking Ukraine. Trump thought this war would be for economics versus China, but now he ask Europe to help him, after having asked Ukraine for drones, when NATO refuse to help him for his war when he attacked and was not attacked. And Gerald Ford nuclear not working don t help claimed powerful USA. Better to have working, not broken, weapons at war.
-
Does the wind blow in China on Earth #2
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3055749] So the future is putting up solar panels in places [b]where the sun does not shine ... [/b][/QUOTE]This must be like when your MAGA Fuhrer said the following, at the 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos:[LIST][i] "China makes almost all of the windmills and yet I haven't been able to find any wind farms in China. Did you ever think of that?"[/i][/LIST]FACT: China (on Earth #1) has 640 GW total capacity and more wind farms then the next 18 countries combined.
I guess on Earth #2, in MAGA World, where the sun doesn't shine in some places, it would seem according to your MAGA Fuhrer, the wind doesn't blow places like China either, LOL!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3056799]LOL! You can't be that MAGA blind...can you? Or does your browser and search functions also not work?
Really, you "fail to see", any connections between the Bonkers Bibi and your MAGA Fuhrer's dumbass gulf-war, "has anything to do with energy"?
AS if, the recent headlines indicating the energy volatility, shortage in supply and the spike in fossil fuel energy prices and markets, due to their boneheaded dumbass gulf-war, wasn't a big enough clue?
AS if, the tens of thousands Iranians, the 150 dead Iranian school girls and the more than 50+ Americans killed (more than the 8 reported) and the blowing up of oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, wasn't a big enough clue for you?[/QUOTE]Ah yes, that is the non-thinking cultist POV. Let's start with an easy error of omission. Here is Chucky Schumer, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/shorts/QRRq_ss9bz4[/URL].
So your dumb ass war includes Democrats participating too, you dimwitted cultist.
150 dead school children? That is a tragedy to be sure, however the Iranian leadership recently killed nearly 7000 of their own. There is another error of omission.
The strait of Hormuz is not closed: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9K2klBcb5U[/URL].
As for oil prices, they have been remarkably stable given all that is happening.
Of course, what matters is not what the price is now but what the futures say. If you could use the futures market and lock in $100 a barrel prices, the drilling party would be on.
[URL]https://oilprice.com/futures/wti/[/URL]
In 2033, the expected price per barrel is $60. In December 2026, it is guessed to be $80. Ugh. It is not drilling party time.
But, but, but Elvis, you are a Trump cultist who goes along with everything Trump does. Bullshit! If you follow the Maduro plan, you take out the #1 and put one of the other top guys in charge as your puppet. Israel was so filled with blood lust they found a meeting of leaders, and we blew them up at their insistence, and our puppets were gone.
Whomever is in charge of Iran is going to purge the fuck out of any other top officials. If you are not 100% clean, you are as good as dead. So what is the mission now? It looks like Trump has backed himself into a TACO retreat or a forever war. Not good.
Thing is if you do the TACO retreat then Iran will be back to building up its drones and missiles. That is not good, and Trump would be whipped by the Israelis leading him around by the nose. A forever war means Republicans get trounced in the midterms.
But as of now, this war has little to do with the future of energy. In fact, the lack of price increases in the oil markets considering the recent events have been remarkably tame. Some are saying the Trump administration is manipulating the futures markets.
But you dumb Dems are all talk and no action. We saw no one here betting on Kamala in the futures markets, and if If Trump's team were manipulating oil futures, a bet on future oil prices skyrocketing would pay off bigly, but none of you dumb Dems will put down any of your own money. You refuse to put your any skin in the game. All you is lay claim to the money of others.
So this war has nothing to do with the future of energy prices or what method of energy generation will be chosen.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3057113]This must be like when your MAGA Fuhrer said the following, at the 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos:[LIST][i] "China makes almost all of the windmills and yet I haven't been able to find any wind farms in China. Did you ever think of that?"[/i][/LIST]FACT: China (on Earth #1) has 640 GW total capacity and more wind farms then the next 18 countries combined.
I guess on Earth #2, in MAGA World, where the sun doesn't shine in some places, it would seem according to your MAGA Fuhrer, the wind doesn't blow places like China either, LOL![/QUOTE]Talk about your perfect timing. Here is what is really going on in China, [URL]https://www.marketwatch.com/story/china-tells-the-world-its-a-haven-for-clean-energy-investors-but-in-fact-its-a-big-time-coal-burner-c20b5367?mod=panda_marketwatch_author_alert[/URL].
The financial newsletter Doomberg recently published a devastating analysis of China's energy reality versus its media portrayal. The core finding: China burns 56% of the world's coal, has tripled consumption since 2000 and is building coal plants at the fastest pace in a decade. Yet the Davos crowd continues to celebrate Beijing's "climate leadership" with the enthusiasm of a golden retriever greeting a burglar.
China installed a record-setting 277 gigawatts of solar capacity in 2024. Headlines everywhere. The energy transition is here, they told us, and China is leading it.
What nobody mentioned: China's solar industry lost $60 billion that same year.
This is not a typo. Sixty billion dollars. China's solar industry's total losses exceeded the GDP of Luxembourg. More than 40 solar manufacturers have gone bankrupt or delisted since 2024. One-third of China's 121 listed solar producers are operating in the red. The top four manufacturers — the giants that were supposed to dominate the 21st century — collectively lost $1. 5 billion in the first half of 2025 alone. The previous year was worse. This year looks worse still.
In 2024, solar capacity grew by 45% while generation increased only 28%. Do the math and the implied capacity factor drops toward 11% or 12%. IEEFA data shows utilization hours collapsed from 1,030 in 2020 to just 473 in 2024.
That means that roughly five-sixths of the time China's solar installations sit there doing nothing. They are the world's most expensive decorations — a clean-energy Potemkin village stretched across the provinces.
China is building solar capacity faster than it can use it, faster than its grid can absorb, faster than any economic logic would justify. The result is panels producing power that nobody can buy, connected to a grid that cannot handle the load, owned by companies that cannot turn a profit.
This is not an energy transition. This is an energy traffic jam.
China's power system runs on medium- and long-term coal purchase agreements. Utilities commit to buying specific volumes of coal-fired electricity, often years in advance. Miss your quota? Pay a penalty. These contracts guarantee coal's market share regardless of whether cleaner alternatives are available.
So when the sun shines bright over Shandong province and solar panels are ready to deliver cheap electrons, the grid often says, "No, thank you. " The coal contracts must be honored. Renewables get curtailed. The system is not designed to optimize for clean energy. It is designed to protect coal.
The structural lock-in gets worse. In 2024, more than 75% of newly approved coal-power capacity in China was financed by coal-mining companies or energy groups with coal-mining operations.
Read that again. The companies digging coal out of the ground are now buying the power plants that burn it. They are not hedging against the energy transition. They are building walls against it. By owning both supply and demand, they guarantee themselves customers for decades regardless of what happens to solar costs or battery technology or climate policy.
Climate coverage loves a solar-farm photograph. Blue panels gleaming under blue skies. Very shareable. Very inspiring.
Nobody photographs methane.
China's coal mines are responsible for 70% of global coal-mine methane emissions from large-scale operations. If all currently proposed mining projects are completed, that share rises to 75%. Methane is roughly 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas over a 20-year horizon. It is the silent partner in every coal operation, and China's operations are enormous.
The green-energy transition will eventually arrive. Physics and economics guarantee it. Battery costs will fall. Grid technology will improve. Solar efficiency will increase. The math will eventually become undeniable even to bureaucrats with coal contracts to protect.
But China will not lead this transition. China is not the future of clean energy. China is the present of coal, dressed in solar-panel camouflage, marketed to a Western audience eager to believe that someone, somewhere, is solving the climate problem.
China is selling the T-shirt, pocketing the markup and burning coal to print more.
End of link. And you Spidy, #1 on the Democratic "I love China" cult chart, are buying those t-shirts by the case.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3057190]Ah yes, that is the non-thinking cultist POV. Let's start with an easy error of omission. Here is Chucky Schumer, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/shorts/QRRq_ss9bz4[/URL].
So your dumb ass war includes Democrats participating too, you dimwitted cultist.
150 dead school children? That is a tragedy to be sure, however the Iranian leadership recently killed nearly 7000 of their own. There is another error of omission.
The strait of Hormuz is not closed: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9K2klBcb5U[/URL].
As for oil prices, they have been remarkably stable given all that is happening.
Of course, what matters is not what the price is now but what the futures say. If you could use the futures market and lock in $100 a barrel prices, the drilling party would be on.
[URL]https://oilprice.com/futures/wti/[/URL]
In 2033, the expected price per barrel is $60. In December 2026, it is guessed to be $80. Ugh. It is not drilling party time..[/QUOTE]At least 150 young girls killed in a school is a war crime, even was probably a target mistake, but US IA leading tomawak is not reliable enough, same than burning Gerald Ford nuclear. Are US weapons aging too much, same than Trump?
About China making biggest, 30%, pollution on our planet and sending us too many dangerous products, for our children safety, for our health, I can only say: cheap, but don't buy such bad dangerous quality, a bit same than Trump, NATO and Europe don t want to help in his craziness, when he doesn't make peace, but war with Netanyahou. 2 dangerous.
-
Some insights for you and that other Anti American traitor Goatanus
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3056924]As was easily predictable by every American smart and patriotic enough to have voted for Clinton in 2016, Biden in 2020 and Harris in 2024, nobody has been better for Russia Russia Russia and China and worse for America than Donald J. Trump.
Nobody.
[B]There are two winners in Iran. Neither one is America.
Oil disruption benefits Russia, as does less U.S. aid for Ukraine. And Iran distracts from China.
March 9, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/03/09/us-iran-russia-china-cost/[/URL]
Dear MAGAs,
Thank you for your vote.
Sincerely and Love You Forever.
Vladimir and Xi.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/why-left-more-distressed-anxious-filled-hate-right[/URL]
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/did-us-intel-agencies-hide-chinese-interference-2020-election-vulgarian-trump[/URL]
-
Funny
In Japan where big oil crisis, they write on gas stations which are closed, because of Trump. Yes, oil crisis and soon for gaz is because of Trump making chaos in the world, lying so much from what he promised to be re elected.
-
3 photos
Trump's undeniable severe dementia has gotten worse
You've also heard Trump claim that some ex-potus supposedly told him he did the right thing in plunging America into another stupid, unprovoked, quagmire, no-win, horribly expensive Repub War based on a Repub lie, this time in Iran, but all of the real ex-potus' have denied talking to him about it? Yeah, there is serious speculation among some insiders that Trump was only talking to himself since, after all, he is an ex-potus too.
[B]Trump calls Gavin Newsom President of the United States while mocking his intelligence[/B]
[URL]https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/trump-gavin-newsom-dyslexia-us-president-video-b2940720.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]Donald Trump accidentally called Gavin Newsom the president of the United States whilst he was insulting his intelligence.
Speaking in the Oval Office on Monday (16 March), Mr Trump said that the Governor of Californias dyslexia makes him not fit for the White House. I think a president should not have learning disabilities, OK?
Mr Trump then said: [b]The president of the United States, Gavin Newscum (Trumps insulting nickname for Newsom) admitted that he has learning disabilities, dyslexia everything about him is dumb."[/b][/QUOTE][B]Trump sparks concern with live name mix-up[/B]
[URL]https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/insight/trump-sparks-concern-with-live-name-mix-up/gm-GM7AA8D58F?gemSnapshotKey=GM7AA8D58F-snapshot-2&uxmode=ruby[/URL]
[QUOTE]During a Women's History Month event, Donald Trump appeared to [b]confuse current press secretary Karoline Leavitt with former adviser Kellyanne Conway, praising Conway as if she still held Leavitt's role. [/b]The moment, captured live, quickly spread online and drew both mockery and concern over Trump's cognitive fitness, particularly given his past criticism of similar gaffes by rivals. While no official explanation has been offered, the slip has intensified scrutiny of his unscripted remarks and public image.[/QUOTE][B]'He's Melting Into a Dementia Puddle': Donald Trump Sparks Concern as He Slurs His Words in Speech Watch[/B]
[URL]https://www.aol.com/articles/hes-melting-dementia-puddle-donald-174815402.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]Trump: "Since I took office we created we've created more than [b]three hundredjerb -- thraaahuuuu take a listen to this number three hundred thousand jobs."[/b][/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3057245]In Japan where big oil crisis, they write on gas stations which are closed, because of Trump. Yes, oil crisis and soon for gaz is because of Trump making chaos in the world, lying so much from what he promised to be re elected.[/QUOTE]Seem US services know since June, Iran was not working much on nuclear, so once more, Trump is lying, when he probably followed Netanyahou in this new war, maybe thinking it could be good for economics versus China, but making economical chaos for everybody. I wish will go to show in fact: loser he is, when not able to stop Ukraine war and now not able to free Ormuz pass, but asking now for help.
-
Transactional Trump
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3057295]Seem US services know since June, Iran was not working much on nuclear, so once more, Trump is lying, when he probably followed Netanyahou in this new war, maybe thinking it could be good for economics versus China, but making economical chaos for everybody. I wish will go to show in fact: loser he is, when not able to stop Ukraine war and now not able to free Ormuz pass, but asking now for help.[/QUOTE]Ya got to love how Netanyahu tells the media, [I][b]"Does anyone really think someone can tell Trump what to do?",[/b][/I] when he knows full well, you don't tell the MAGA Fuhrer want to do, you simply PAY him to do it. LOL! [URL]https://www.israelnationalnews.com/flashes/680310[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3057370]Ya got to love how Netanyahu tells the media, [I][b]"Does anyone really think someone can tell Trump what to do?",[/b][/I] when he knows full well, you don't tell the MAGA Fuhrer want to do, you simply PAY him to do it. LOL! [URL]https://www.israelnationalnews.com/flashes/680310[/URL][/QUOTE]Netanyahou, his gang and tsahal are big criminals problems for our world and your crazy senile Trump followed them for Gaza and now again, lying about Iran working on nuclear. But wars were always good business for USA even they lost many in last times.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrosate: China is playing the 'clean energy long game'
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3057202]Talk about your perfect timing. Here is what is really going on in China, [URL]https://www.marketwatch.com/story/china-tells-the-world-its-a-haven-for-clean-energy-investors-but-in-fact-its-a-big-time-coal-burner-c20b5367?mod=panda_marketwatch_author_alert[/URL]. [/QUOTE]While western pundits will focus on short-term loses in the Chinese solar industry, they often fail to realize, that China is playing the [I][b]"clean energy long game",[/b][/I] as it will take decades and decades for them (and not [I]the U.S.[/I] unfortunately) to keep supplying the world, with clean energy tech, as the world transitions and electrifies their economies.
Don't forget, it took Uber approximately $31 billion in loses over 14 years, before becoming profitable. And that's just one U.S. company!
Funny you should now post this article, as China's April 1st, 2026 removal of export tax rebates, seeks to remedy their solar industry from a "Volume" to "Value" proposition. Again, this is NOT an unusual strategy for China, as it has cornered the market, with almost 90% of the world's solar manufacturing. So watch for more company shakeouts and price increases in the industry.
It wasn't too long ago, when I remember similar western pundits, where quick to jump over short-term loses in other Chinese clean tech industries, like EV, batteries, wind, high-speed rail and drones, and look how they turned out. Loses over several few years, won't deter China's clean energy industry ambitions, from their long-term 10,15 to 25 year goals.
There's a battle underway to win the energy export market between the world's two largest economies: The US wants the world to buy its fossil fuels, while China wants to sell the world its clean energy technologies.
For now, there is a clear winner: China.
The country's exports of electric vehicles, solar panels, batteries and other carbon-cutting technology has been climbing for years. Exports hit a record in August, with $20 billion in products shipped globally, according to a new report from the think tank Ember.
"China reached a record value in cleantech exports even as technology prices have fallen sharply," said Euan Graham, a data analyst for Ember.
The US, which has positioned itself as a major fossil fuel exporter, sold $80 billion in oil and gas abroad through July, the last month with data available. China exported $120 billion in green technology over the same period.
That's a continuation of a trend. The US hit a record in oil exports in 2024, according to the Energy Information Administration. Yet China's clean technology exports were $30 billion higher.
Dollars only tell part of the story. The price of solar panels is falling, which means that China is exporting more of them per dollar earned. August's solar export revenue was nowhere near the high set in March 2023. But the 46,000 megawatts of power capacity shipped abroad set a record. [URL]https://www.business-standard.com/world-news/china-leads-in-clean-energy-exports-overtaking-us-fossil-fuel-dominance-125100600095_1.html[/URL]
If you take your head out of your MAGA Fuhrer's ass, for 10 seconds, stop with the hubris and take a look at the long-term energy picture (especially since your Fuhrer just blew up the Strait of Hormuz), in 2024, [I][b]China's $180 bn electrostate clean energy exports[/b][/I][NOPARSE] were killing the U.S.'s $150 bn (MAGA Fuhrer) petrostate fossil fuel [/NOPARSE]exports. And leading the [I]U.S. by $40 bn,[/I] through July 2025.
A short-term loss in solar for China, does mean a loss overall in the "clean energy long game". [B]The trend is clear,[/B] as the world moves towards more clean energy tech, so far it seems, China will be the dominant player, to supply the world, this tech.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: The Trend is Your Friend
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3055749]Then there is this trash about Trump and Israel that I fail to see has anything to do with energy. So this is textbook TDS.[/QUOTE]As the headlines say otherwise!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3057190]So this war has nothing to do with the future of energy prices or what method of energy generation will be chosen.[/QUOTE]LOL! Want to make up your mind?
First you claim the war has nothing to do with energy, which I dispelled easily. So now it's the war has nothing to do with, [I][b]the future of energy prices?[/b][/I] OR [I][b]what method of energy generation will be chosen?[/b][/I] Of which, to be clear, are both still about energy.
Dude, I just follow the trends! And the trends clearly signify, a shift and move towards clean energy, clean tech and the undeniable electrification of everything (where possible)? Naturally, there'll be ebbs and flows, but make no mistake about it the trend is clear.
In 2024, China exported $180 bn in clean tech energy, compared to the [I]U.S.[/I] exported $150 bn (burn it once and poof it's gone like dinner) fossil fuels.
-
Boots! On! The! Ground!
Come on already! Armageddon baby! WW3 baby! I'm rock hard for this. What's taking so long?
Why start a war and don't have boots on the ground? There's something fishy going on.
It's like some kind of weird conspiracy. Is any of this even real?
Boots?
-
1 billion USD cost per day for Americans for Trump lies about Iran war. 500 millions for Israel per day, 0 tourism, increasing deficit, at least 1 good point versus Netanyahou and tsahal crimes.
-
A poignant clip for you and that other USA hater Mr Goatanus
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3057233][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/why-left-more-distressed-anxious-filled-hate-right[/URL]
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/did-us-intel-agencies-hide-chinese-interference-2020-election-vulgarian-trump[/URL][/QUOTE][URL]https://youtube.com/shorts/Uor1Z0fSb5Q?si=j_kEQU4jkDyY7D_h[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3057400]Come on already! Armageddon baby! WW3 baby! I'm rock hard for this. What's taking so long?
Why start a war and don't have boots on the ground? There's something fishy going on.
It's like some kind of weird conspiracy. Is any of this even real?
Boots?[/QUOTE]WW1: June 28,1914, assassination of Austria-Hungary's Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo by a Serbian nationalist.
WW2: September 1, 1939, when Nazi Germany invaded Poland.
WW3: Donald Trump prefers seeing the world burn with him instead of going to jail.
-
3 photos
Trump will surely praise and thank Mueller for his service.
Donald Trump would have to be hopelessly deranged to say anything bad about the man he claimed "completely and totally exonnerated" him, right?
Lolololol.
[B]'Total EXONERATION: Trump savors post-Mueller victory lap.
March 24, 2019[/B]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/24/trump-mueller-report-1233442[/URL]
[QUOTE]"No Collusion, No Obstruction, Complete and Total EXONERATION. KEEP AMERICA GREAT! Trump tweeted, later telling reporters before boarding Air Force One, Its a shame that our country had to go through this.[/QUOTE][B]Former special counsel Robert Mueller dies at 81.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/21/robert-mueller-died-at-81.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
I mean, seriously, what kind of deranged, ungrateful, lying sack of shit would have anything bad to say about a fellow Repub who provided such a glowing, positive report on his behalf?
That is, unless he was being a deranged, lying sack of shit about what he said back then about Mueller's report, of course.
Lololol.
Has anybody heard or read the lovely post-mortem statement the so-called president has no doubt issued about the man who delivered the best news any honorable and truthful man could wish for?
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3057396]As the headlines say otherwise!
LOL! Want to make up your mind?
First you claim the war has nothing to do with energy, which I dispelled easily.[/QUOTE]Obviously, you cannot walk and chew bubble gum at the same time. I said the war will not have anything to do with the long term price of energy nor will it have anything to do with what is used to generate elctricity in the future.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3057396]Dude, I just follow the trends! And the trends clearly signify, a shift and move towards clean energy[/QUOTE]The trends show how following the energy policy of the dumb Dems will lead us to high cost energy such as that found in Germany and in California. The trends are buying solar panels and windmills that sit around and add nothing to the grid.
To wit, By far the most important measure of a grid is its reliability, and a grid that is "only" 99% reliable would be catastrophic for a developed economy. In the US, grid operators aim to meet what's known as the "1-in-10 year" standard, defined as no more than 24 hours of outages over a 10-year period or 99.97% reliability.
To achieve that standard, supply and demand must be precisely balanced too much electricity can be just as problematic as too little. A baseload power source is one that operates 24/7 at a steady, predictable output. A dispatchable source, by contrast, can be ramped up or down quickly to match fluctuations in demand.
Coal and nuclear are classic examples of baseload power, but they are not ideal for dispatchable use due to their slow ramp rates. Natural gas and impoundment hydroelectric plants, however, are typically both baseload and highly dispatchable, capable of adjusting output within minutes. Battery backup systems are dispatchable but not baseload, as they can respond quickly but cannot sustain output for extended periods without recharging. Intermittent renewables like wind and solar, both dependent on weather conditions rather than demand, are neither baseload nor reliably dispatchable.
Once these fundamental truths are understood, two things become clear. First, the ideal grid is built on a solid foundation of cheap baseload power, supplemented by highly dispatchable sources to manage fluctuations in demand. Second, a grid composed solely of solar, wind, and batteries is preposterous on its face the volume of batteries required to provide baseload power for days or weeks at a time borders on the absurd. This is why no such system has ever been piloted at a reasonable scale: the moment it is, the flaws would become immediately and fatally obvious.
And we have already seen what you will do when the dumb Dem polices that lead us off the cliff actually happen. It is the power generators; it is electricity mismanagement; it is the utilities companies.
When the reality is that it is just people like you being stupid.
As for your claim, solar is cheaper. Spain and Portugal just showed it is not. Last week, an expansive article in Bloomberg Greenconfessionally titled "The Fix For Solar Blackouts Is Already Here "captured this sentiment. It lamented that the penetration of solar and wind has outpaced the buildout of stabilization technologies such as synchronous condensers and grid-forming inverters. In other words, the renewables worked as designed, but the infrastructure to integrate them safely at such high percentages of supply lagged far behind:
"The result is huge spending on new wind and solar capacity, but not enough on grids. The 27 members of the European Union and the UK invest on average $0. 7 in grids for every dollar spent on renewables, according to BloombergNEF. Spain ranks the lowest, with only $0. 3 spent for every dollar.
Blackouts are causing political backlash against renewables that politicians cannot afford right now. 'Here's the problem: Investments in the right infrastructure are not keeping up,' said Antnio Guterres, head of the United Nations, in a July speech. 'That ratio should be one to one.'
Guterres did not realize the seriousness of his admission. The acknowledgment that each new solar plant requires a dollar-for-dollar match in grid investment means the capital needed to actually use solar electricity is at least double what proponents claim. This fact undercuts one of the most persistent myths in energy policy: that because sunshine is free, solar power must necessarily be the cheapest source of electricity.
In reality, while the marginal cost of sunlight is zero, the true system cost of integrating solar into a modern grid includes the heavy and ongoing capital expenditures needed for transmission, stabilization, and balancing services. Without those, the electricity produced cannot be delivered reliably, making it far less "cheap" than advocates claim.
In December and January, California's PV capacity factors dip below 10%, with extended stretches of minimal solar output. Given the state's goal of completely purging hydrocarbons from the grid, what exactly is the plan for winter? Install 15-20 times more solar capacity than average daily demand? And how many batteries would be required to bridge a week or two of low production? How will they be recharged?
At least California's solar capacity factors align with its seasonal electricity demand. In the US Northeast, the region faces two seasonal demand peaksone during the summer heat and another in the depths of winter. Yet solar capacity factors there regularly dip below 5% for weeks at a time between November and January, leaving grid operators scrambling to cover peak demand.
Despite these obvious and well-known facts, the Northeast has been shutting down thermal and nuclear plants while racing to replace them with solar, wind, and batteries, and it's going about as well as you'd expect.
Consider New Jersey, where shocking increases in residential power bills have dominated local headlines over the past few weeks. In some cases, bills are tripling, with even more increases on the way. The developing economic and political crisis has already sparked the usual rounds of blamestorming, with renewable energy advocates pointing to rising demand from data centers as the proximate cause.
If you really were following the trends and were not a cultist, you would see that shoving alternative energy down people's noses results in higher energy prices.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3057643]Donald Trump would have to be hopelessly deranged to say anything bad about the man he claimed "completely and totally exonnerated" him, right?
Lolololol.
[B]'Total EXONERATION: Trump savors post-Mueller victory lap.
March 24, 2019[/B]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/24/trump-mueller-report-1233442[/URL]
[B]Former special counsel Robert Mueller dies at 81.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/21/robert-mueller-died-at-81.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
I mean, seriously, what kind of deranged, ungrateful, lying sack of shit would have anything bad to say about a fellow Repub who provided such a glowing, positive report on his behalf?
That is, unless he was being a deranged, lying sack of shit about what he said back then about Mueller's report, of course.
Lololol.
Has anybody heard or read the lovely post-mortem statement the so-called president has no doubt issued about the man who delivered the best news any honorable and truthful man could wish for?[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/robert-mueller-dies-trump-good-im-glad-hes-dead[/URL]
-
3 photos
Ah yes
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3057684][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/political/robert-mueller-dies-trump-good-im-glad-hes-dead[/URL][/QUOTE]From your link:
[QUOTE][quote]In response, President Trump took to Truth Social to dance on his grave - writing "Robert Mueller just died. Good, Im glad hes dead. He can no longer hurt innocent people! President DONALD J. TRUMP."[/quote]
Key findings included:
No conspiracy or coordination: The report concluded there was insufficient evidence to establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.
Russian interference confirmed: It detailed extensive Russian operations, including hacking Democratic emails and a social media disinformation campaign by the Internet Research Agency.
Obstruction of justice: Mueller did not reach a conclusion on whether Trump obstructed justice, stating the office could not exonerate him but also could not charge a sitting president under DOJ policy. The report outlined 10 potential instances of obstruction but left the matter to Congress or future prosecutors.[/QUOTE]So.
Who were these supposedly "innocent" people that your lord and savior is so passionate about defending against fellow Repub Mueller's investigation conclusion that Russia Russia Russia interfering with the 2016 election in order to help Repub Trump and not Dem Clinton get elected did indeed happen and was not a hoax? Was it Trump's favorite Top, Vladimir? Has to be.
There is nothing in the findings cited in your link that refutes what everyone with a brain accepted and understood about Repub Mueller's investigation and report from the moment we had a chance to see it and not be lied to about it by Liar Trump and his Liar AG Barr.
-
Holy cow Batman!
Iran is threatening to invade UAE? Holy Shits Batman! Now this is the escalation we're talking about!
Fucking finally, all those idiot digital nomad fucking influencers in Dubai will finally get a taste of what real life is like. Wooh!
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Smart electrical grids of tomorrow!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3057661]Obviously, you cannot walk and chew bubble gum at the same time. I said the war will not have anything to do with the long term price of energy nor will it have anything to do with what is used to generate elctricity in the future.[/QUOTE][NOPARSE]Ya gotta love the boldface lies, backpedaling and revisionism from MAGA and Repubs, especially those most perpetrated and promoted by their Fuhrer himself.[/NOPARSE]
[LIST]So you're still gonna lie and claim you to fail to see the MAGA Fuhrer/Israel - Iran War, has "anything to do with energy"? after saying those exact words: [i][b]"Then there is this trash about Trump and Israel that [u]I fail to see has anything to do with energy.[/u]", [/b][/i] here: [url]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3055749&viewfull=1#post3055749[/url][/LIST]
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3057661]To wit, By far the most important measure of a grid is its reliability, and a grid that is "only" 99% reliable would be catastrophic for a developed economy. In the US, grid operators aim to meet what's known as the "1-in-10 year" standard, defined as no more than 24 hours of outages over a 10-year period or 99.97% reliability.
To achieve that standard, supply and demand must be precisely balanced too much electricity can be just as problematic as too little...[/QUOTE]Instead posting reams of of "cut-and-paste" passages from the article, to make it look like your words, [U]just provide the link to the article,[/U] so I can read it for myself. Unlike MDS1, at least you took out the [I]"ADVERTISEMENT" labels...LOL![/I].
As far as grid reliability goes, if gas is more reliable than coal and nuclear is more reliable than gas, why has there only been 2 nuclear power plants built in the United States, this century, and in the last 30 years?
Wattsbar in Tennessee and Vogal Units 3 & 4 in Georgia. Vogal took 15 years to construct and cost $37 billion dollars, [B]more than twice the projected timeline and costs[/B] and is the single most expensive power plant in the USA [URL]https://www.oregonpsr.org/plant_vogtle_the_true_cost_of_nuclear_power_in_the_u_s [/URL].
What you constantly fail to realize, is that the electrical grids of tomorrow, not only will need to be "reliable", they also need to be, cleaner, greener, resilient, flexible, adaptable and smart.
What you also again, fail to realize, is that the electrical grids of tomorrow, will need the smart flexibility to handle, much of the clean, green renewable economy with electrotech, such as: rooftop-solar, EV's, battery storage tech, VPPs, heat pumps, heat batteries, pumped hydro, wave energy tech, UHVDC, HVDC & HVAC interconnectors, V2 G, V2 H, V2 be, V2 X, H2 G, B2 G and X2 G. Etc.
This is what "reliability" will look like, in the electrical grids of tomorrow!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3057976]What you constantly fail to realize, is that the electrical grids of tomorrow, not only will need to be "reliable", they also need to be, cleaner, greener, resilient, flexible, adaptable and smart.
What you also again, fail to realize, is that the electrical grids of tomorrow, will need the smart flexibility to handle, much of the clean, green renewable economy with electrotech, such as: rooftop-solar, EV's, battery storage tech, VPPs, heat pumps, heat batteries, pumped hydro, wave energy tech, UHVDC, HVDC & HVAC interconnectors, V2 G, V2 H, V2 be, V2 X, H2 G, B2 G and X2 G. Etc.
This is what "reliability" will look like, in the electrical grids of tomorrow![/QUOTE]LOL. You are out of your fucking mind. Maybe your ability to read has been compromised. Let me repeat the reason why that is not going to happen: A grid composed solely of solar, wind, and batteries is preposterous on its face the volume of batteries required to provide baseload power for days or weeks at a time borders on the absurd. This is why no such system has ever been piloted at a reasonable scale: the moment it is, the flaws would become immediately and fatally obvious.
Your grid of tomorrow better have 100 X the capacity of batteries, which are hardly carbon neutral, than what exists today and even that may not be enough.
-
[QUOTE=NewtonYork;3057823]Iran is threatening to invade UAE? Holy Shits Batman! Now this is the escalation we're talking about!
Fucking finally, all those idiot digital nomad fucking influencers in Dubai will finally get a taste of what real life is like. Wooh![/QUOTE]Many influencers left Dubai, running like rabbits, returning to more safe France. Now, the world know Dubai is not as safe as they claim to be, but so easily shot, so, rabbits ran away, when not many Dubaiots in Dubaď, even banks leaving. Al Makhtoum can thank Trump who made chaos all over the world, when losing economics war versus Iran, due to his huge ignorance about outside his golf and about war he never made, but thinking same than golf. At least, we can see loser Trump won t rule the world, more than chaos he is making with his daily bullshits.
-
When USA are led by a ignorant about war and the world, funny, from war killing them, but poor but so courageous Ukrainians learned so much to become experts for war 2.0 with drones, even advising now, big but not so powerful USA which have already to repair Gerald Ford nuclear.
Also very funny, democrats defeated Trump at home, when rich place. Maybe his end in November. Our world would be happy to be gotten rid of master of bullshits, so boring guy when Iran resist to him.
-
Iran just take a page out of the Trump / MAGA grifting playbook?
I take [NOPARSE]no pleasure from the senseless death on both sides of the US/Israel-Iran war, that the MAGA Fuhrer and Bonkers Bibi started. But that said, U GOTTA LUV, the latest turn of events for Iran, to turn the war into a money making grift, by charging ships, US$1 million to move through the Straits ---fuckin' genius and freakin' hilarious!
Talk about out smarting, out maneuvering and taking a page out of the Trump/MAGA grift playbook, by essentially taxing and putting a "toll" or "tariff", on the ships going through the Strait of Hormuz...LOL[/NOPARSE]!
[B]P.S.: [/B] As part of reparations, some pundits speculate, Iran my just decide to keep the ongoing [B]"Trump like tariffs",[/B] but increase the tolls in the Strait, after the war. Who says you can't teach an old dog new tricks?
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3058352]I take [NOPARSE]no pleasure from the senseless death on both sides of the US/Israel-Iran war, that the MAGA Fuhrer and Bonkers Bibi started. But that said, U GOTTA LUV, the latest turn of events for Iran, to turn the war into a money making grift, by charging ships, US$1 million to move through the Straits ---fuckin' genius and freakin' hilarious!
Talk about out smarting, out maneuvering and taking a page out of the Trump/MAGA grift playbook, by essentially taxing and putting a "toll" or "tariff", on the ships going through the Strait of Hormuz...LOL[/NOPARSE]!
[B]P.S.: [/B] As part of reparations, some pundits speculate, Iran my just decide to keep the ongoing [B]"Trump like tariffs",[/B] but increase the tolls in the Strait, after the war. Who says you can't teach an old dog new tricks?[/QUOTE]Trump lost economics war, just making chaos in economics, making losing more jobs. A really really bad guy for our world, but criminal Netanyahou follower. What are now USA, after beach resort in Gaza. Shameful.
-
3 photos
Trump's method for negotiating everything.
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3058412]Trump lost economics war, just making chaos in economics, making losing more jobs. A really really bad guy for our world, but criminal Netanyahou follower. What are now USA, after beach resort in Gaza. Shameful.[/QUOTE]It was known long before Trump ran for office the first time that his method for negotiation goes something like this:
He enters a banquet where everything is running along pretty well but can be improved upon with a few smart tweaks here and there.
He gets his fat ass up on the top of the main buffet table, drops his pants and takes a huge steaming wet dump right into the main entre bowl.
At that point and compared to what he just did anything else that happens looks reasonable.
But it will not be Trump to clean up the colossal mess he made.
Somebody else will rush in, do whatever is necessary to clean up the colossal mess he made or try to and the measures that must be taken will surely require stirring his shit around and dealing with it in ways nobody would have needed to do had he not climbed to the top of that buffet table and taken that huge steaming wet dump on anything.
He will still try to get back up on that table to do it again the whole time somebody else is trying to clean up the mess. Only the most eager Trump shit-eaters will allow him back up in that table.
In the end, no matter how effectively Trump's colossal mess has been cleaned up by somebody else it will not be put back as well and easily improvable as it was before he took his huge steaming wet dump on it.
However, he will still take credit for the clean up and tout it as "the greatest achievement in history, Sir", quoting an imaginary friend he always calls upon whenever he feels particularly lonely and unappreciated.
-
Dems again flip Repub ruby red seats!
[B]Democrats Secure Stunning Victories in Florida Special Elections, [/B] March 25th, 2026. [URL]https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-secure-stunning-victories-in-florida-special-elections-11731500[/URL] In these unprecedented election times and major victory wins for the Dems, as they again defy double digit Repub ruby red led districts in the 2024 election, and flip two legislative seats in the Florida state congress.
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3058335]Also very funny, democrats defeated Trump at home, when rich place. Maybe his end in November. Our world would be happy to be gotten rid of master of bullshits, so boring guy when Iran resist to him.[/QUOTE]Yes, very funny indeed! I had a good laugh, as the Dems flipped his the seat in his home district of Mar-a-lago. LOL! Worst president in USA History! November will be real interesting and stay tuned for the "NO KINGS" March this weekend.
-
3 photos
Putting the lie to what pundits have been insisting.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3058450][B]Democrats Secure Stunning Victories in Florida Special Elections, [/B] March 25th, 2026. [URL]https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-secure-stunning-victories-in-florida-special-elections-11731500[/URL] In these unprecedented election times and major victory wins for the Dems, as they again defy double digit Repub ruby red led districts in the 2024 election, and flip two legislative seats in the Florida state congress.
Yes, very funny indeed! I had a good laugh, as the Dems flipped his the seat in his home district of Mar-a-lago. LOL! Worst president in USA History! November will be real interesting and stay tuned for the "NO KINGS" March this weekend.[/QUOTE]These dozens of previously strong Red seats being flipped to Blue and in a big way vs zero Blue seats being flipped Red virtually from the moment Trump squeaked out that razor-thin election win in November 2024, even before he enacted his failed tariffs and trade war with everyone, even before prices began to increase because of it, even before they substantially increased the rate of inflation, even before his economic policies virtually killed positive private-sector jobs creation in America, even before he began bombing and invading several countries trying to start unproked wars around the world and on and on is further evidence that the Repub Trump / Dem Harris election campaign issues so adamantly insisted upon by pundits and are still insisted upon by them as "the reason Trump won" brought the contest to a draw, at most.
Contrary to the pundit spin, the American electorate was not really choosing one or the other on the issues of The Economy, Inflation, Immigration, Crime, Wokeism or any other such thing.
That is why it was and has been so easy for voters to totally abandon the supposedly "winning side" of those issues and from Day One. At best it was a coin flip for Trump on those issues two Novembers ago. Close enough for the coin to flip up Dem ever since.
Nope. As I said almost from the week after the 2024 election; a relatively tiny handful of one typically Dem-voting demographic swinging juuuust enough, by less than a single percentage point among them, from the Dem to the Repub on one passionate issue for them in the only 3 swing states that mattered was the sole reason Trump squeaked out a razor-thin win for a 2nd term that he had been campaigning for and not doing anything else particularly challenging for a know nothing, do nothing lazy slob Repub like him since 12 Noon on January 20,2017.
Counting the players on the field back in November 2024, that's why and how it happened. No other reason.
Counting the millions of Biden 2020 voters who were so satisfied with how their personal finances and feeling of security and safety were in November 2024 that they were simply not angry or dissatisfied enough about anything to bother voting and / or had allowed themselves to be bamboozled by pro Repub pretend Bothsiders / Neithersiders into actually believing it doesn't matter all that much, good or bad, which Party is in the White House because "stuff just happens", those voters were awakened to the horrible penalty for falling for such BS soon thereafter and more so with every passing hour.
Even Mainstream Media pundits' tireless efforts to terrify big Dem campaign donors into abandoning the Party by convincing them, falsely, that Joe Biden was cognitively impaired and that Kamala Harris was a "weak" candidate and should engage in a late hour primary battle over the nomination only she could seamlessly accept has been shown to be utterly immaterial since several credible polls are now showing far more approval for them as president then and now over Trump.
Oh well.
We tried.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3058450][B]Democrats Secure Stunning Victories in Florida Special Elections, [/B] March 25th, 2026. [URL]https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-secure-stunning-victories-in-florida-special-elections-11731500[/URL] In these unprecedented election times and major victory wins for the Dems, as they again defy double digit Repub ruby red led districts in the 2024 election, and flip two legislative seats in the Florida state congress.
Yes, very funny indeed! I had a good laugh, as the Dems flipped his the seat in his home district of Mar-a-lago. LOL! Worst president in USA History! November will be real interesting and stay tuned for the "NO KINGS" March this weekend.[/QUOTE]But what is not funny is USA elected twice a so crazy and racist who started his career not paying his tax, then became a sexual criminal, then tried to destroy Capitol, I can never understand how it is possible to trust such liar making lost jobs, inflation and chaos all over the world with his criminal friends and Netanyahou who loves to kill women and children, ready for anything to avoid Israel justice. USA led by Trump are a shameful and dangerous country. I remember Romanians reaction on end of 1989.
-
The Electrostate! Ridding the world of CO2!
[URL]https://www.climate.gov/media/15559[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3058472]These dozens of previously strong Red seats being flipped to Blue and in a big way vs zero Blue seats being flipped Red virtually from the moment Trump squeaked out that razor-thin election win in November 2024, even before he enacted his failed tariffs and trade war with everyone, even before prices began to increase because of it, even before they substantially increased the rate of inflation, even before his economic policies virtually killed positive private-sector jobs creation in America, even before he began bombing and invading several countries trying to start unproked wars around the world and on and on is further evidence that the Repub Trump / Dem Harris election campaign issues so adamantly insisted upon by pundits and are still insisted upon by them as "the reason Trump won" brought the contest to a draw, at most.
Contrary to the pundit spin, the American electorate was not really choosing one or the other on the issues of The Economy, Inflation, Immigration, Crime, Wokeism or any other such thing.
That is why it was and has been so easy for voters to totally abandon the supposedly "winning side" of those issues and from Day One. At best it was a coin flip for Trump on those issues two Novembers ago. Close enough for the coin to flip up Dem ever since.[/QUOTE]Yes, I think USA are not open minded enough, not ready for a woman for president, when would may be less dead from free weapons, when no more Indians on horses with arrows, and less war, compare to senile promises for peace, when he aimed peace Nobel award. Nobel should laugh when looking who the fat orange is. But he would win for sure Olympics gold medal for master of bullshits. So boring to hear shit from his mouth every day, making USA ridiculous in front of the world.
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3058487]But what is not funny is USA elected twice a so crazy and racist who started his career not paying his tax, then became a sexual criminal, then tried to destroy Capitol, I can never understand how it is possible to trust such liar making lost jobs, inflation and chaos all over the world with his criminal friends and Netanyahou who loves to kill women and children, ready for anything to avoid Israel justice. USA led by Trump are a shameful and dangerous country. I remember Romanians reaction on end of 1989.[/QUOTE]When Trump, Rubio and others of gang show us daily how they are ignorant and stupid, and lack of weapons for US army, but now Yemen to help Iran. After Ormuz, they may block red sea now. Oil and economics crisis because of USA.
-
More than 30 billions USD spent since 1 month for Trump war, following criminal Netanyahou. Lies of Trump about Iran, when worse now. Rather than becoming richer, but to pay for Americans and oil crisis to pay for everyone because of Trump. Really crazy bad joker.
-
What makes you guys think theres even going to be mid terms?
All this really about red and blue, flipping here and there. I think we all know that there won't end be any midterms. This is our reality now. Bunch of idiots voted for orange, so rest of the world, you will suffer with us. I say bring on WW3! Wooooh! Finally, my shitty life can be over.
-
Only 2 unqualified women have ever run
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3058543]Yes, I think USA are not open minded enough, not ready for a woman for president, when would may be less dead from free weapons, when no more Indians on horses with arrows, and less war, compare to senile promises for peace, when he aimed peace Nobel award. Nobel should laugh when looking who the fat orange is. But he would win for sure Olympics gold medal for master of bullshits. So boring to hear shit from his mouth every day, making USA ridiculous in front of the world.[/QUOTE]I think USA would elect a qualified smart woman. But only 2 women ran in the past. Both dumb and unqualified. Thank god neither got elected.
-
Do tell
[QUOTE=Canada;3058712]I think USA would elect a qualified smart woman. But only 2 women ran in the past. Both dumb and unqualified. Thank god neither got elected.[/QUOTE]Just let your mind go free and please tell us what would have happened to America if the woman who got the most votes in 2016 and the woman who only missed it by less than 0. 75 of a single percentage point of just one demographic of voters spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered in 2024, PA, MI and WI, swinging away from their usual voting pattern had won in 2024.
This ought to be good.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3058712]I think USA would elect a qualified smart woman. But only 2 women ran in the past. Both dumb and unqualified. Thank god neither got elected.[/QUOTE]There's a third, Jo Jorgensen, the Libertarian candidate in 2020, who would have done a better job than any of the bozos elected to office during the last 35 years. A fourth, Jill Stein, ran on the Green Party ticket twice, but like Kamala Harris, she would have sucked.
I disagree with you about Hillary Clinton. She was smart and qualified. Given the Republicans won the House and Senate, she just might just have made a good president, like her husband did in his second term when forced to work with Republicans. Harris is indeed a cackling dumb ass.
-
More keyboard diarrhea from Bangkok / Bullshit Bob
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3058787]Just let your mind go free and please tell us what would have happened to America if the woman who got the most votes in 2016 and the woman who only missed it by less than 0. 75 of a single percentage point of just one demographic of voters spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered in 2024, PA, MI and WI, swinging away from their usual voting pattern had won in 2024.
This ought to be good.[/QUOTE]I believe in giving credit where credit is due.
"just one demographic of voters spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered in 2024".
Behind Trump's 2024 Victory, a More Racially and Ethnically Diverse Voter Coalition.
White, Hispanic and Asian naturalized citizens each shifted in Trump's direction between 2020 and 2024.
55% of White naturalized citizens voted for Trump in 2024, compared with 41% in 2020.
51% of Hispanic naturalized citizens voted for Trump, up from 39% in 2020.
46% of Asian naturalized citizens voted for Trump, an increase from 35% in 2020.
Asian vote jumped from 30% to 40%.
Hispanic vote jumped 12% to 48%.
Black men bumped his vote from 8% to 16%.
Even 2 out of 3 gay white men voted for Our Lord and Savior.
Majority of white women voted for him in 2016 over Bubbas hideous tranny husband, majority did the same in 2024.
Please stop throwing your feces around the forum like a drunk monkey in the monkey house at the zoo.
Your lame attempts at cherry picking data is childish!
Seems everyone loves Our Lord and Savior except lame ass America hating, CCP 24/7 rimming Bangkok Bob.
WHOMP WHOMP WHOMP.
-
It's the End of the World as We Know It (and I Feel Fine)
Been lurking and not following this threads so my thoughts may just be repetitions.
They say reality outdoes fiction and I can think of no movie plot which would have a such a fucking idiot being elected as a President not just once but twice, and then being enticed into a war by a leaching nation (Israel) which is in no way in its interests, and then prosecuting that war in a manner with so predictable outcomes.
There are so many things wrong with this whole situation. A) I've always been trying to be understanding of Americans who voted for Trump: ("they're struggling; they're looking for a revival of America; immigration concerns; etc.") but their ongoing support of a man who is in the process of destroying their livelihoods and possibly the world is a disgrace; their lapping up complete BS propaganda like the Nazis did but in the 21st century when any right minded person can look up objective facts is a disgrace.
B) Israel: the fact that America is literally owned by Israel is a scandal. American democracy has literally collapsed. A nation of fascist Zionist racists are running America, whilst committing genocide and getting away with it. No proud American should possibly tolerate this but it seems that America has caved in completely and utterly. This is Israel's war. If American soldiers die, they are dying for Israel, not America.
C) The end game: there are only 3 end game scenarios- Iran capitulates; Israel and its lapdog America carry out increasingly ferocious and lethal assaults on Iran, including nuclear attacks; or America caves in and walks away humiliated.
None of these scenarios is inconceivable. The second scenario is one where the world will be changed forever and once that precedent is set, I do think humanity is on borrowed time because others will start using nukes too, and it's plausible that Israel will at some point be wiped off the face of the planet, but hundreds of millions or billions perhaps of other humans too would too. In the final scenario, America is humiliated, disgraced, loses its soft power (it's already lost a great deal of hard power by depletion of its Tomahawks, etc) and is eclipsed by China who will bring their inevitable invasion of Taiwan forward (which America will look upon impotently).
This SOB and his Zionist puppet masters are in the process of destroying America, the world, and he still has millions of starry eyed fuckwith acolytes. If you don't laugh you can only weep.
-
3 photos
Late arrivals, total waste of time and money
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3058825]There's a third, Jo Jorgensen, the Libertarian candidate in 2020, who would have done a better job than any of the bozos elected to office during the last 35 years. A fourth, Jill Stein, ran on the Green Party ticket twice, but like Kamala Harris, she would have sucked.
I disagree with you about Hillary Clinton. She was smart and qualified. Given the Republicans won the House and Senate, she just might just have made a good president, like her husband did in his second term when forced to work with Republicans. Harris is indeed a cackling dumb ass.[/QUOTE]Virtually all of the best legislation passed by Bill Clinton that recovered America from the ravages of the previous 12 years of Repub Prez Recessions, skyrocketing deficits with little jobs creation to show for it, that super-charged the Clinton Economy, created millions of jobs, averted so much as a single small recession and produced the budget surplus that incoming Repub so-called president GW Bush totally squandered with typical Repub-style failed tax and economic policies was accomplished and passed by President Clinton and his Dem Congress from 1993 through 1994, especially their Omnibus Budget Reconcilliation Act of 1993, which was so opposite of the failed Reagan Repub agenda that not one Repub voted for it.
The historic Clinton / Dem 1990's economic expansion and success was already well on its way months before the Repubs took control of Congress in January 1995.
The only thing Nude Grinbitch and his fellow Know Nothing, Do Nothing Repubs contributed to the historic Clinton / Dem economic gains of the 1990's was to hobble it and make it produce weaker results than it otherwise would have due to the Repubs shutting down the government multiple times in standoffs with Clinton that Clinton won every time, spending the rest of their time sniffing around his dick and balls in a mad mission to find out where they'd been, culminating in Grinbitch being turned out of office in humiliation by his own Repub Party for failing so miserably to destroy the USA Economy under Clinton's and the Dems' consistently superior policy results the way they always try to do it as with Obama, Biden, etc.
Neither Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris nor any other Dem would have reversed or significantly altered the agenda and results of their Democratic Party for at least the past 100 years, which is to Make America Greater, stronger and more prosperous, create more and better jobs for more Americans and not plunge us into a Great Repub-style Depression, Great Repub-style Recession, Great Repub-style skyrocketing Unemployment Rates, Great Repub-style Jobs Destruction in the millions and any counterproductive, quagmire, no-win Wars of Choice as in Repub Eisenhower's Vietnam War, Repub GW Bush's Iraq War, Repub GW Bush's Afghanistan War and Repub Trump's Iran War.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3058834]I believe in giving credit where credit is due.
"just one demographic of voters spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered in 2024".
Behind Trump's 2024 Victory, a More Racially and Ethnically Diverse Voter Coalition.
White, Hispanic and Asian naturalized citizens each shifted in Trump's direction between 2020 and 2024.
55% of White naturalized citizens voted for Trump in 2024, compared with 41% in 2020.
51% of Hispanic naturalized citizens voted for Trump, up from 39% in 2020.
46% of Asian naturalized citizens voted for Trump, an increase from 35% in 2020.
Asian vote jumped from 30% to 40%..[/QUOTE]But Trump lied again, as he always did. Where is his peace he promised to be reelected? But following criminal facist Netanyahou and now new failure after Vietnam and Afghanistan, when Trump is such a ignorant about the world out of his golf. But Americans will pay now, even if he doesn't make US meat, like does Putin for Russian meat, but they are friends for prostitutes in Moscow. In Iran, they aim to become famous martyr.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3058712]I think USA would elect a qualified smart woman. But only 2 women ran in the past. Both dumb and unqualified. Thank god neither got elected.[/QUOTE]I don't think USA are ready, when couldn't elect worse than Trump they already experienced and for not respecting US constitution, or maybe US are maso and love to be fucked deep and hard in the ass for second time and paying inflation, lost jobs and deaths for this. I think, except Netanyahou and Putin, world look forward next one.
-
3 photos
Nope. None of that got Trump elected.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3058834]I believe in giving credit where credit is due.
"just one demographic of voters spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered in 2024".
Behind Trump's 2024 Victory, a More Racially and Ethnically Diverse Voter Coalition.
White, Hispanic and Asian naturalized citizens each shifted in Trump's direction between 2020 and 2024.
55% of White naturalized citizens voted for Trump in 2024, compared with 41% in 2020.
51% of Hispanic naturalized citizens voted for Trump, up from 39% in 2020.
46% of Asian naturalized citizens voted for Trump, an increase from 35% in 2020.[/QUOTE]BULLETIN:
More Black people voting for Trump in New Yotk than some previous Repub candidates did not win New York for him. Not one Electoral College Vote from New York helped Trump squeak out his razor-thin win.
More Latinos voting for Trump in California than some previous Repub candidates did not win California for him. Not one Electoral College Vote from California helped Trump squeak out his razor-thin win.
In fact, NO typically Dem-voting demographic in any Blue state contributed to flipping that typically Blue state to Trump because not a single typically Blue state flipped to Trump and not one Electoral College vote from a typically Blue state helped Trump squeak out his razor-thin win.
Look at the Electoral College votes in the swing states that put Trump at or over the magic 270 number. The first ones that did and after that no other swing states EC Votes were necessary were from PA, MI and WI, the only 3 swing states that mattered to the outcome of the election.
Among those three swing states the greatest margin of "victory" for Trump was from PA, where he received a 1. 5 percentage point more votes than Harris. Meaning a swing of only 0. 75 of that percentage point of votes in that state from Trump to Harris, plus 1 more, would have given that state's EC Votes to Harris. In the other two swing states, MI and WI, the spread was much smaller than 1. 5 percentage point. Like half or less as much.
Yep, those were the three swing states where a concerted effort was made to move the angry Muslim vote from the Dem, who they typically vote for, to the Repub. Not so much the Black votes or the Latino votes in those three states. They were not extraordinarily targeted by the Trump campaign to give a shit about Haitians eating the dogs and eating the cats or where trannies pee. Nope. But the Muslim Community in those three states was extraordinarily targeted to continue to be angry at the Biden Administration for Netanyahu not honoring his May 2024 Biden-negotiated ceasefire until AFTER the election.
And there you have it.
Hear that prolonged squeaking sound? That was Netanyahu contributing to Trump's razor-thin election "victory" more than any other person on the planet.
And now you know why gas prices are climbing and American lives, blood and money are going to be shed and spent on that Trump-to-Netanyahu Payback War in Iran for a long, long, long time.
-
Agreed
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3058834]I believe in giving credit where credit is due.
"just one demographic of voters spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered in 2024".
Behind Trump's 2024 Victory, a More Racially and Ethnically Diverse Voter Coalition.
White, Hispanic and Asian naturalized citizens each shifted in Trump's direction between 2020 and 2024.
55% of White naturalized citizens voted for Trump in 2024, compared with 41% in 2020.
51% of Hispanic naturalized citizens voted for Trump, up from 39% in 2020.
46% of Asian naturalized citizens voted for Trump, an increase from 35% in 2020..[/QUOTE]Agreed. Blacks, Hispanics, women votes all increased for Trump in 2024. The Biden disaster changed their minds. Now if we could only get Trump to go to Canada and make Canada great again.
-
Electrostate v Petrostate: CO2 Wars? Oil Spills? Flaring? Who really pollutes more?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3051054]Hot damn, an energy discussion![/QUOTE]Anytime you're ready!
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3058525][b]The Electrostate! Ridding the world of CO2![/b]
[url]https://www.climate.gov/media/15559[/url][/QUOTE][B][i]Not this old chestnut...again?[/i][/B] Is that all you got, cause that chart doesn't constitute much of a debate? Care to provide a better context, as to what it is, you're trying to say? But for now I'll just throw up a link of my own, to refute what it is I'm guessing you're trying to say.
[URL]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions[/URL]
-
MAGA / Repub stupid blindass white male loyalty
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3058860]They say reality outdoes fiction and I can think of no movie plot which would have a such a fucking idiot being elected as a President not just once but twice, and then being enticed into a war by a leaching nation (Israel) which is in no way in its interests, and then prosecuting that war in a manner with so predictable outcomes.
There are so many things wrong with this whole situation. A) I've always been trying to be understanding of Americans who voted for Trump: ("they're struggling; they're looking for a revival of America; immigration concerns; etc.") but their ongoing support of a man who is in the process of destroying their livelihoods and possibly the world is a disgrace; their lapping up complete BS propaganda like the Nazis did but in the 21st century when any right minded person can look up objective facts is a disgrace. [/QUOTE][B]Hegseth Strikes Two Black and Two Female Officers From Promotion,[/B] March 27th, 2026 [URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/27/us/hegseth-promotion-list.html[/URL]
Just take the latest round of racist and sexist behavior from a Repub party in drastic decline, and that should tell you, pretty much, most of what you need to know about MAGA / Repubs, where white male dumbass blind loyalty is the ONLY so called [I]"political currency"[/I] of worth, that is wanted or welded, by a corrupt, racist and xenophobic party.
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3058860]B) Israel: the fact that America is literally owned by Israel is a scandal. ...
This SOB and his Zionist puppet masters are in the process of destroying America, the world, and he still has millions of starry eyed fuckwith acolytes. If you don't laugh you can only weep.[/QUOTE]Hear, Hear!
[I]March 23, 2026,[/I] [B]The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it [/B] [I]"The USA Government is insolvent. That's not hyperbole it's the conclusion drawn directly from the Treasury Department's own consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2025, released last week to near-total media silence. The numbers: $6. 06 trillion in total assets against $47.78 trillion in total liabilities as of September 30,2025."[/I] [URL]https://fortune.com/2026/03/23/us-government-insolvent-fiscal-crisis-fix/[/URL]
This is why the MAGA Fuhrer, loves his MAGA suckers, as he, his cronies and his billionaire pickpocketers, bleed the country dry.
-
3 photos
Neither Hillary nor Kamala would have been this stupid and reckless
The A. I. Overview Update:
[QUOTE][b]China and Russia getting wealthier thanks to the iran war[/b]
+8
Based on analysis from March 2026, the Iran war has provided significant economic benefits and strategic, long-term advantages to both Russia and China, helping Russia fuel its war machine and allowing China to secure cheaper energy while accelerating its energy transition.
Peterson Institute for International Economics
Peterson Institute for International Economics
+2
[B]Russia's Gains[/b]
Energy Windfall: Russia's economy, previously facing budget strains, gained a "lifeline" due to soaring oil prices. As the Iran conflict restricted supply, global oil prices surged, allowing Russia to sell its crude at higher prices, with forecasts estimating as much as $45 billion to $151 billion in additional budget revenues in 2026.
Financing the War: By early March 2026, Russian Urals crude stood at $90 a barreldouble the price of the previous monthgenerating an estimated $8.5 billion in additional revenue per month to support Russia's conflict in Ukraine.
Strategic Position: Russias dependence on China deepens, but it also strengthens its position in the "Axis of Evasion" by trading with Iran and strengthening its role as a key player in the Middle East.
Peterson Institute for International Economics
Peterson Institute for International Economics
+3
[B]China's Gains[/b]
Cheap Energy Access: Despite the threat to global markets, China has continued to receive discounted Iranian oil, strengthening its economy.
Acceleration of Energy Transition: The conflict acts as a catalyst for China's shift to electrification. As the world's largest manufacturer of clean-tech supplies (about 70% of global supply), China is positioned to benefit from a global acceleration in energy transition, while its own reliance on oil decreases.
Geopolitical Leverage: China has maintained a "no alliances" stance while building an "Axis of Evasion" to facilitate trade outside the Western financial system. Furthermore, Chinese manufacturing supports the supply chains that Iran and Russia rely on for weapons, strengthening these ties. [/QUOTE]No Democrat would have been as helpful and determined to destroy America, its economy and National Security I order to Make China and Russia Russia Russia Great And Wealthier at the total expense of American lives, American blood, American taxpayer dollars and American National Security as the Repub MAGAs that could have but did not vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and / or Kamala Harris in 2024 and the China-loving, Russia Russia Russia-loving, America-hating Trump and fellow Repubs they allowed to squeak out those razor-thin election victories.
Oh well.
We tried.
-
DEI Kills dum dum
[QUOTE=Spidy;3058977][B]Hegseth Strikes Two Black and Two Female Officers From Promotion,[/B] March 27th, 2026 [URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/27/us/hegseth-promotion-list.html[/URL]
Just take the latest round of racist and sexist behavior from a Repub party in drastic decline, and that should tell you, pretty much, most of what you need to know about MAGA / Repubs, where white male dumbass blind loyalty is the ONLY so called [I]"political currency"[/I] of worth, that is wanted or welded, by a corrupt, racist and xenophobic party.
Hear, Hear!
[I]March 23, 2026,[/I] [B]The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it [/B] [I]"The USA Government is insolvent. That's not hyperbole it's the conclusion drawn directly from the Treasury Department's own consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2025, released last week to near-total media silence. The numbers: $6. 06 trillion in total assets against $47.78 trillion in total liabilities as of September 30,2025."[/I] [URL]https://fortune.com/2026/03/23/us-government-insolvent-fiscal-crisis-fix/[/URL]
This is why the MAGA Fuhrer, loves his MAGA suckers, as he, his cronies and his billionaire pickpocketers, bleed the country dry.[/QUOTE]Just look at the crash in DC in Jan 2025 black ATC, look at Air Canada last week, DEI kills!
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2026/02/08/today-is-the-day-fans-of-pro-trump-nicki-minaj-announce-move-to-republican-party/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2026/03/29/watch-nick-cannon-calls-the-democratic-party-the-party-of-the-kkk-says-i-fk-with-trump/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2026/03/30/tlc-singer-chilli-says-she-is-not-maga-after-accidentally-sharing-post-calling-michelle-obama-a-man-donating-to-republicans/[/URL]
Donald J Trump is a living GOD, so is Bad Ass Pete!!
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBo45Jz0jXU[/URL]
-
Clinton is it really you
[QUOTE=Canada;3058952]Agreed. Blacks, Hispanics, women votes all increased for Trump in 2024. The Biden disaster changed their minds. Now if we could only get Trump to go to Canada and make Canada great again.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=clinton[/URL]+jaws.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: When petrostates dig up fuel 1000 x times more potent
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3057988]LOL. You are out of your fucking mind. [/QUOTE]Nah, but your MAGA Fuhrer is!
However, I am still waiting on the link to the article, from your last post, where I requested to verify the info / source. I know how reams of "cut-and-paste" are your thing (along with MDS1), as if it were your own words, but at least have the courtesy of supplying the link.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3057988]Maybe your ability to read has been compromised. Let me repeat the reason why that is not going to happen: A grid composed solely of solar, wind, and batteries is preposterous on its face the volume of batteries required to provide baseload power for days or weeks at a time borders on the absurd. This is why no such system has ever been piloted at a reasonable scale: the moment it is, the flaws would become immediately and fatally obvious.[/QUOTE]Speaking [NOPARSE]of not being able to read a lick...dude, which [/NOPARSE]part of [I]"the electrical grids of tomorrow, will need the smart flexibility to handle, much of the clean, green renewable economy with electrotech, such as: rooftop-solar, EV's, battery storage tech, VPPs, heat pumps, heat batteries, pumped hydro, wave energy tech, UHVDC, HVDC & HVAC interconnectors, V2G, V2H, V2B, V2X, H2G, B2G and X2G...etc",[/I] did you not understand?.[/QUOTE]LOL! The MAGA hubris on clean energy, just keeps marching on!
Dude, you do realize, most everything we use comes from the earth (out of the ground) and as such, isn't carbon neutral, right? However, once battery materials have been dug out of the ground (just like fossil fuels, [B]but unlike fossil fuels[/B]), they don't burn-off C02 and GHG, into the atmosphere, for a "one-time ONLY use", as they can be reused anywhere from 3-10,000 cycles or more and they have a 95% to 99% recycling capacity?
Let's see you try that with fossil fuels!
[B]Another fun fact:[/B] Let's really put things into perspective shall we, as annual data reports, show that, the world digs up and extracts over 15 billion tonnes of fossil fuels, every year, verses 12-15 million tons of battery materials mined each year. So allow me to do the math for you, as that's a whopping [I]1000x times greater...LOL![/I].
[B]One More Thing:[/B] [NOPARSE]The UAE are currently building a world's first 24/7 solar PV (5.2GWh) + batteries (19GWh) powered plant [/NOPARSE](January 15,2025) [URL]https://www.power-technology.com/news/uae-24-7-solar-pv-battery-storage[/URL] [NOPARSE]That's only 4x times greater! Not like the 100x times greater number you pulled outta your [/NOPARSE]ass! Get your FACTS straight!
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3058993]The A. I. Overview Update:
No Democrat would have been as helpful and determined to destroy America, its economy and National Security I order to Make China and Russia Russia Russia Great And Wealthier at the total expense of American lives, American blood, American taxpayer dollars and American National Security as the Repub MAGAs that could have but did not vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and / or Kamala Harris in 2024 and the China-loving, Russia Russia Russia-loving, America-hating Trump and fellow Repubs they allowed to squeak out those razor-thin election victories.[/QUOTE]Yes, when Americans pay inflation and already 13 deaths at war, but liar Trump gives big money to Putin for his war attacking Ukraine.
-
The Electrostate!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3058970]
[B][i]Not this old chestnut...again?[/i][/B] Is that all you got, cause that chart doesn't constitute much of a debate? Care to provide a better context, as to what it is, you're trying to say? But for now I'll just throw up a link of my own, to refute what it is I'm guessing you're trying to say.
[URL]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions[/URL][/QUOTE]Some on the left blame America for all the world's ills. And some go one step further and blame just Republicans for slavery, historical oppression of minorities, AND global warming, right Tooms? It's a shame game. But we don't have any control over the past. You can't step into a magic time machine, go back, wave a magic wand, and presto change o, America's historical CO2 emissions are lower than China's.
And you wouldn't want them to be. The USA surpassed China in carbon emissions during the Second Industrial Revolution, in the late 1880's. The modern economy we have now was built on the back of fossil fuels. Without them, we wouldn't have plastics, many chemicals, bounteous agricultural production, construction materials like cement, steel, and glass, transportation, electronics components, and many drugs.
Without the carbon economy, you wouldn't even be driving around in a buggy, because there would be no wrought iron. And you and I would be wearing diapers made of animal skins instead of Depends.
Until Deng Xiaopeng rose to power in the late 1970's, China was primarily an agrarian country. Using technology and methods developed in the USA, Europe and Japan, China piggybacked on the carbon economy. The improvement in the living conditions of its populace in a short period of time was astounding. One side effect, by the mid 2000's carbon emissions from China surpassed the USA's.
Courtesy of ChatGPT:
Currently Chinese carbon emissions are about 2.8 X higher than the USA's.
China emits 0.72 kg of CO2 per $ of GDP (nominal). The USA emits 0.26 kg per dollar.
55% to 60% of China's total energy consumption comes from coal, and 60% to 65% of its electricity generation is from coal. For comparison, coal provides about 10% of total USA Energy and 15% to 16% of USA Electricity.
Because of its reliance on coal, the air and water in China are much more polluted than in the USA.
The simple fact is that the so-called "petrostate" has greatly reduced carbon emissions since 2000. And during that same time, the electrostate's carbon emissions have increased by about 3.5 X.
-
Democracy and DEI at work!
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3059003]Just look at the crash in DC in Jan 2025 black ATC, look at Air Canada last week, DEI kills![/QUOTE][U]When DEI just works in a Democracy:[/U]
[NOPARSE] New Hampshire House Carroll County District 7Bobbi Boudman (D)
Texas Senate District 9Taylor Rehmet (D)
Arkansas House District 70Alex Holladay (D)
Florida House District 87Emily Gregory (D)
Florida Senate District 14Brian Nathan (D)
Georgia House District 121Eric Gisler (D)
Iowa Senate District 1Catelin Drey (D)
Iowa Senate District 35Mike Zimmer (D)
Pennsylvania Senate District 36James Malone (D)
Mississippi Senate District 2Theresa Gillespie Isom (D)
Mississippi Senate District 45Johnny DuPree (D)
Mississippi House District 22Justin Crosby (D)
Virginia
District 23Candi King (D)
District 30John McAuliff (D)
District 41Lily Franklin (D)
District 57May Nivar (D)
District 64Stacey Carroll (D)
District 66Nicole Cole (D)
District 69Mark Downey (D)
District 71Jessica Anderson (D)
District 73Leslie Mehta (D)
District 75Lindsey Dougherty (D)
District 82Kimberly Pope Adams (D)
District 86Virgil Thornton Sr. (D)
District 89Kacey Carnegie (D)
New Jersey
District 2Maureen Rowan (D)
District 8Anthony Angelozzi (D)
District 21Andrew Macurdy (D)
District 21Vincent Kearney (D)
District 25Marisa Sweeney (D)
[/NOPARSE][URL]https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-seats-democrats-flipped-since-trump-returned-11734830[/URL].
[U]MAGA White-Privilage DEI, gone bad:[/U]
[URL]https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2026-opinion-hegseth-culture-wars-are-inviting-military-disaster/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/27/hegseth-mistakes-some-trump-allies-00254817[/URL]
-
3 photos
I don't recall those posts
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059143]Some on the left blame America for all the world's ills. And some go one step further and blame just Republicans for slavery, historical oppression of minorities, AND global warming, right Tooms? It's a shame game. But we don't have any control over the past. You can't step into a magic time machine, go back, wave a magic wand, and presto change o, America's historical CO2 emissions are lower than China's.[/QUOTE]I haven't spent much time on the issues of slavery, historical oppression of minorities OR global warming here. Oh, I might have to clarify when some MAGA here tries to suggest "The Democrats" were the ones fighting on the side of slavery in the Civil War with a reminder that it was the Southern regional voters of that day who approved of slavery when it only happened that their duly-elected representatives for that wish were Democrats but ever since Democrats proposed, fought for and passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960's those same Southern regional voters abandoned the Democratic Party for the Republican Party. And their new (since the late 1960's) duly-elected representatives from that Republican Party try as much as possible to honor their constituents' wishes to oppress minorities, celebrate their pro-slavery past and so on. But that's about it.
No, my mission here and elsewhere is to help make it as clear as virtually all of the data, evidence, facts and easily observable reality over the past 100 years fully supports and virtually zero of it refutes that if you love and want Great Depressions, Great Recessions and Massive Jobs Destruction for yourself, your family, friends and America then by all means vote for any candidates other than Democrats or stay home and don't bother to vote at all. However, if you love and want none of those things for yourself, your family, friends and the rest of America but instead much prefer great economic recoveries, great economic expansions and historic jobs creation then you must vote for Democrats and no other candidates up and down every ballot in every election for which you qualify to vote, no exceptions.
Global Warming, the slavery and oppression of minorities thing? Well, not coincidentally the same Repub Party that can't, simply won't but either way certainly hasn't proposed, fought for or passed a single legislation or program in the past 100 years that averts those aforementioned economic disasters and promotes and produces the far better ones are also quite shitty at improving the environment and making it easier rather than more difficult for everyone who qualifies, minorities included, to exercise their Right to Vote.
But that is more of an unfortunate additional by-product of the Repub Party's general agenda to produce utterly crap economic results over and over and over again, which is a more pertinent and interesting topic to me, rather than their primary objective.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059143]Some on the left blame America for all the world's ills. And some go one step further and blame just Republicans for slavery, historical oppression of minorities, AND global warming, right Tooms? It's a shame game. But we don't have any control over the past. You can't step into a magic time machine, go back, wave a magic wand, and presto change o, America's historical CO2 emissions are lower than China's.
And you wouldn't want them to be. The USA surpassed China in carbon emissions during the Second Industrial Revolution, in the late 1880's. The modern economy we have now was built on the back of fossil fuels. Without them, we wouldn't have plastics, many chemicals, bounteous agricultural production, construction materials like cement, steel, and glass, transportation, electronics components, and many drugs.
Without the carbon economy, you wouldn't even be driving around in a buggy, because there would be no wrought iron. And you and I would be wearing diapers made of animal skins instead of Depends..[/QUOTE]China make 30% of pollution on our planet and USA are second for pollution, polluting about double per citizen than Europeans. For me, buying Chinese products is supporting their government lying, not respecting human rights and slaving children and buying US products is supporting Trump who makes chaos in our world, so, I boycott both, I keep my 6 yo mobile I made repaired, I don t buy electric car. I refuse to support these 2 governments, my ideology, when China also make losing jobs in western countries, from their cheap, many dangerous, products made by companies helped by government which aim to destroy western economics and our children with very dangerous tik tok explaining them how to suicide. I think we really need to protect versus China and also Trump.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059162]I haven't spent much time on the issues of slavery, historical oppression of minorities OR global warming here. Oh, I might have to clarify when some MAGA here tries to suggest "The Democrats" were the ones fighting on the side of slavery in the Civil War with a reminder that it was the Southern regional voters of that day who approved of slavery when it only happened that their duly-elected representatives for that wish were Democrats but ever since Democrats proposed, fought for and passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960's those same Southern regional voters abandoned the Democratic Party for the Republican Party. And their new (since the late 1960's) duly-elected representatives from that Republican Party try as much as possible to honor their constituents' wishes to oppress minorities, celebrate their pro-slavery past and so on. But that's about it.
No, my mission here and elsewhere is to help make it as clear as virtually all of the data, evidence, facts and easily observable reality over the past 100 years fully supports and virtually zero of it refutes that if you love and want Great Depressions, Great Recessions and Massive Jobs Destruction for yourself, your family, friends and America then by all means vote for any candidates other than Democrats or stay home and don't bother to vote at all. However, if you love and want none of those things for yourself, your family, friends and the rest of America but instead much prefer great economic recoveries, great economic expansions and historic jobs creation then you must vote for Democrats and no other candidates up and down every ballot in every election for which you qualify to vote, no exceptions.
Global Warming, the slavery and oppression of minorities thing? Well, not coincidentally the same Repub Party that can't, simply won't but either way certainly hasn't proposed, fought for or passed a single legislation or program in the past 100 years that averts those aforementioned economic disasters and promotes and produces the far better ones are also quite shitty at improving the environment and making it easier rather than more difficult for everyone who qualifies, minorities included, to exercise their Right to Vote.
But that is more of an unfortunate additional by-product of the Repub Party's general agenda to produce utterly crap economic results over and over and over again, which is a more pertinent and interesting topic to me, rather than their primary objective.[/QUOTE]The politicians in Washington, Democrat and Republican, mostly make our lives worse. We pay taxes out the ass and get very little in return. And they've still managed to run up a national debt (net) of over $30 trillion. They get us into wars.
My state, city and state governments on the other hand do a great job, and provide value for the taxes we pay. For me, they're all run by Republicans. Of course it could be different elsewhere. But given how many people are leaving blue states and blue cities, I suspect not.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3059161]
[U]When DEI just works in a Democracy:[/U]
...Virginia
District 23Candi King (D)
District 30John McAuliff (D)
District 41Lily Franklin (D)
District 57May Nivar (D)
District 64Stacey Carroll (D)
District 66Nicole Cole (D)
District 69Mark Downey (D)
District 71Jessica Anderson (D)
District 73Leslie Mehta (D)
District 75Lindsey Dougherty (D)
District 82Kimberly Pope Adams (D)
District 86Virgil Thornton Sr. (D)
District 89Kacey Carnegie (D)
New Jersey
District 2Maureen Rowan (D)
District 8Anthony Angelozzi (D)
District 21Andrew Macurdy (D)
District 21Vincent Kearney (D)
District 25Marisa Sweeney (D)...
[/QUOTE]Uh, that's gerrymandering, not DEI.
-
3 photos
I seriously doubt that
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059245]The politicians in Washington, Democrat and Republican, mostly make our lives worse. We pay taxes out the ass and get very little in return. And they've still managed to run up a national debt (net) of over $30 trillion. They get us into wars.
My state, city and state governments on the other hand do a great job, and provide value for the taxes we pay. For me, they're all run by Republicans. Of course it could be different elsewhere. But given how many people are leaving blue states and blue cities, I suspect not.[/QUOTE]Was your city and state immune to and miraculously thrived during The Great Repub Hoover Depression, The Great Repub Reagan Recession, The Great Repub GW Bush Recession, The Muliple Ordinary Repub Recessions and pathetic job growth under Repub Eisenhower, Repub Nixon, Repub Ford, Repub GHW Bush and that bonus one under Repub GW Bush, The Great Repub Trump's Pandemic, the skyrocketing Repub unemployment rates and the millions of jobs wiped out as the result of them? Did they also dodge Repub Eisenhower's Vietnam War, Repub GW Bush's War in Iraq, Repub GW Bush's War in Afghanistan and doing just fine now with Repub Trump's War in Iran? Are you folks still paying Repub Trump's imaginary $1. 99 per gallon for regular gas over there in Hootervile?
Sounds like you live in one of those Red Cities in Red States that Dem Presidents and Dem Congresses gift with extra emergency welfare and economic stimulus during times of inevitable Repub economic and National Security catastrophe. I mean in addition to the half-dozen or so Blue States carrying the load for deadbeat Red States even during normal times.
[B]What Republicans Dont Want To Say: Blue States Are the Ones Bailing Out Red States[/B]
[URL]https://time.com/7222411/blue-states-are-bailing-out-red-states/[/URL]
[QUOTE]The red state denial of fiscal responsibility is manifest today as misguided voices champion the economic virtues of red states. For instance, President Donald Trump and the GOP have threatened to block disaster relief for Californian wildfires, to obstruct the return of federal relief for state and local tax payments, and to roll back the massive industrial investments from Biden-era legislation. Now, as GOP leaders in both chambers advance their budget proposals, Republicans are pursuing other politically punitive budget measures before the March 14 debt funding deadline.
However, blue states would do well to remember that it is they who are picking up the bill for red states. Before Republicans start criticizing Democrats about their dependence on federal dollars, a quick review of the facts may be warranted. For instance, while federal dollars to New York represented 38% of its state budget in 2022, Texas received the same proportion, and Florida received even more (40%). Similarly, much attention from the GOP is given to Medicaid funding in blue states such as Illinois, but they conveniently ignore the fact that Texas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, and West Virginia, among other red states, see a greater share of the cost of their traditional Medicaid programs covered by the federal government.
[/QUOTE]Tell Aunt Bea, Jethro, Gomer and yourself, "You're welcome" from me and my fellow tax-payers in California, the fourth biggest economy on the planet.
-
America and Europe, then China
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3059165]China make 30% of pollution on our planet and USA are second for pollution, polluting about double per citizen than Europeans. [/QUOTE]Just the FACTS please!
Yes you are correct about emissions by China today and for the last couple of decades, but look beyond the last couple of decades, at the cumulative emissions total, and you'll see it is America and Europe still in the lead.
FACTS: The two (2) biggest cumulative CO2 emissions polluters, are USA (America) in first place, with [I][b]434.87 billion tons of CO2/GHG,[/b][/I] and then then Europe at 300.9 bn tons. In third place China at 285.09 bn tons. [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions[/URL].
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: America is still the biggest C02/ GHG emissions polluter
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059143] You can't step into a magic time machine, go back, wave a magic wand, and presto change o, America's historical CO2 emissions are lower than China's.
...
The USA surpassed China in carbon emissions during the Second Industrial Revolution, in the late 1880's. The modern economy we have now was built on the back of fossil fuels.
Courtesy of ChatGPT:
Currently Chinese carbon emissions are about 2.8 X higher than the USA's.. [/QUOTE]Your history lesson on China vs. USA Emissions is hilarious, but lets stick to the emissions FACTS, shall we!
[B]Our World in Data: Cumulative CO2 emissions:[/B] [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions[/URL] November 13,2025. [I](Note: [u]LINK[/u], DATA and FACTS, courtesy of Google search, because quite frankly, I trust very little that comes outta MAGA or ChatGOP without links for context!)[/I].
As of November 13,2025, Our World in Data, reports that the country with the largest cumulative emissions (CO2 and GHG) in history, since the first year of recording, is the USA (America) in first place, with [I][b]434.87 billion tons of CO2/GHG,[/b][/I] Europe at 300.9 bn tons and third place China at 285.09 bn tons.
No "what-ifs", "no magic wand" and no MAGA voodoo spin. Just the FACTS, since they began recording emissions data. Period!
[U]The Emissions Bottom Line:[/U]
While fossil fuels aren't exactly in favor and by some accounts are plateauing or trending down, many emerging markets / countries, such as Africa, Asia, Indonesia, the Middle-East and Latin America, are siting on huge coal reserves, gas reserves, oil reserves and are looking around at the two (2) biggest cumulative CO2 emissions polluters over the last 125+ years, in America and Europe, that have industrialized and driven their economies burning fossil fuels and are wondering, [I][b]why can't we do the same,[/b][/I] at our discretion?
I'm pretty sure China, asked that very same question, as they began in earnest, industrializing their economies, as they do today with regards to transitioning to greener and cleaner energy.
[B]P.S:[/B] Hey, I'm sure your MAGA Fuhrer would be proud, that America is still #1 and the biggest C02/ GHG emissions polluter in history!
-
Electrostate vs. Petestate: From China Circa 2000 to Manufacturing Superpower 2026
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059143]You can't step into a magic time machine, go back, wave a magic wand, and presto change o, America's historical CO2 emissions are lower than China's.
...
One side effect, by the mid 2000's carbon emissions from China surpassed the USA's.
Courtesy of ChatGPT:
Currently Chinese carbon emissions are about 2.8 X higher than the USA's. ... 55% to 60% of China's total energy consumption comes from coal, and 60% to 65% of its electricity generation is from coal. For comparison, coal provides about 10% of total USA Energy and 15% to 16% of USA Electricity.
...
The simple fact is that the so-called "petrostate" has greatly reduced carbon emissions since 2000. And during that same time, the electrostate's carbon emissions have increased by about 3.5X.[/QUOTE]While I'm not disputing your ChatGOP "cut-and-paste" factoid hockey assist [I](although I would like to see for myself, the links associated with the facts and data),[/I] allow me to provide a little context of my own, with regards to China's rise in emissions, circa 2000.
[U]A Little Chinese Emissions (circa 2000) History of My Own:[/U] (hockey assist and link, courtesy of Google search).
Your historical account of China overtaking the [I]U.S. in emissions circa 2000,[/I] is correct. However, it does deserves just a little context, I'm sure you'll appreciate.
So while you [I](or is it ChatGOP?)[/I] like to post, pontificating and waxing lyrical about the carbon economy's [I]"what-ifs"[/I] and [I]"magic wands",[/I] although entertaining [I](courtesy of ChatGOP?)[/I] you should do well to remember, it was about the same time, circa 2000, [I][b]when China also became "The World's Manufacturer",[/b][/I] as American, European and the rest of the industrial and manufacturing world, often sought the lowest cost of labor, production and manufacturing, which more often than not, was China.
So as the rest of the world, was outsourcing large portions of their industry and manufacturing to China (and Asia), [I][b]they were [u]also outsourcing[/u] a rather large portion [u]their factories CO2 emissions,[/u][/b][/I] as well. Somewhat I would imagine, to China's chagrin, some years later, when huge smog and high CO2 levels, engulfed parts of the country.
[B]Charted: Chinas Rise to Manufacturing Dominance Over 30 Years,[/B] December 9, 2024 [URL]https://www.visualcapitalist.com/charted-chinas-rise-to-manufacturing-dominance-over-30-years/[/URL].
[B]Bottom Line w/r to China Circa 2000: [/B]So when you're a country that started at 6% (circa 2000) and now produces, close to 30% of the world's manufacturing [I](with market share projected to rise to 45% by 2030),[/I] as the rest of the world's manufacturing falls [I](and America is projected to fall from 25% (circa 2000) to 11%),[/I] then it [NOPARSE]should be obvious to anyone, YOU'RE going to BURN LIKE 2.8x to 3.5x TIMES MORE COAL (which was the country's most available fuel source), than the next guy, to produce 30-45% the world's [/NOPARSE]goods.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3059265]Just the FACTS please!
Yes you are correct about emissions by China today and for the last couple of decades, but look beyond the last couple of decades, at the cumulative emissions total, and you'll see it is America and Europe still in the lead.
FACTS: The two (2) biggest cumulative CO2 emissions polluters, are USA (America) in first place, with [I][b]434.87 billion tons of CO2/GHG,[/b][/I] and then then Europe at 300.9 bn tons. In third place China at 285.09 bn tons. [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions[/URL].[/QUOTE]But pollution increased a lot since about 40 years, because of China, now Trump claiming he doesn't care about pollution and India growing much too much. Millions of people die from pollution. Pollution made by China is above our head daily.
-
What a senile night talk to fuck deeper Americans. Many billions spent. Already 13 deaths and many injured. Time to fire the crazy in November, when lying for peace and failing for MAGA, other than trying robbery.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3059267]
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: America is still the biggest C02/ GHG emissions polluter[/QUOTE]That's ridiculous. Maybe you should study up on verb tenses. "Is" is the [B]present[/B] tense of the verb "to be. ".
[QUOTE=Spidy;3059267]Your history lesson on China vs. USA Emissions is hilarious, but lets stick to the emissions FACTS, shall we!
[B]Our World in Data: Cumulative CO2 emissions:[/B] [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions[/URL] November 13,2025. [I](Note: [u]LINK[/u], DATA and FACTS, courtesy of Google search, because quite frankly, I trust very little that comes outta MAGA or ChatGOP without links for context!)[/I].
As of November 13,2025, Our World in Data, reports that the country with the largest cumulative emissions (CO2 and GHG) in history, since the first year of recording, is the USA (America) in first place, with [I][b]434.87 billion tons of CO2/GHG,[/b][/I] Europe at 300.9 bn tons and third place China at 285.09 bn tons.
No "what-ifs", "no magic wand" and no MAGA voodoo spin. Just the FACTS, since they began recording emissions data. Period!
[U]The Emissions Bottom Line:[/U]
While fossil fuels aren't exactly in favor and by some accounts are plateauing or trending down, many emerging markets / countries, such as Africa, Asia, Indonesia, the Middle-East and Latin America, are siting on huge coal reserves, gas reserves, oil reserves and are looking around at the two (2) biggest cumulative CO2 emissions polluters over the last 125+ years, in America and Europe, that have industrialized and driven their economies burning fossil fuels and are wondering, [I][b]why can't we do the same,[/b][/I] at our discretion?
I'm pretty sure China, asked that very same question, as they began in earnest, industrializing their economies, as they do today with regards to transitioning to greener and cleaner energy.
[B]P.S:[/B] Hey, I'm sure your MAGA Fuhrer would be proud, that America is still #1 and the biggest C02/ GHG emissions polluter in history![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Spidy;3059272]While I'm not disputing your ChatGOP "cut-and-paste" factoid hockey assist [I](although I would like to see for myself, the links associated with the facts and data),[/I] allow me to provide a little context of my own, with regards to China's rise in emissions, circa 2000.
[U]A Little Chinese Emissions (circa 2000) History of My Own:[/U] (hockey assist and link, courtesy of Google search).
Your historical account of China overtaking the [I]U.S. in emissions circa 2000,[/I] is correct. However, it does deserves just a little context, I'm sure you'll appreciate.
So while you [I](or is it ChatGOP?)[/I] like to post, pontificating and waxing lyrical about the carbon economy's [I]"what-ifs"[/I] and [I]"magic wands",[/I] although entertaining [I](courtesy of ChatGOP?)[/I] you should do well to remember, it was about the same time, circa 2000, [I][b]when China also became "The World's Manufacturer",[/b][/I] as American, European and the rest of the industrial and manufacturing world, often sought the lowest cost of labor, production and manufacturing, which more often than not, was China.
So as the rest of the world, was outsourcing large portions of their industry and manufacturing to China (and Asia), [I][b]they were [u]also outsourcing[/u] a rather large portion [u]their factories CO2 emissions,[/u][/b][/I] as well. Somewhat I would imagine, to China's chagrin, some years later, when huge smog and high CO2 levels, engulfed parts of the country.
[B]Charted: Chinas Rise to Manufacturing Dominance Over 30 Years,[/B] December 9, 2024 [URL]https://www.visualcapitalist.com/charted-chinas-rise-to-manufacturing-dominance-over-30-years/[/URL].
[B]Bottom Line w/r to China Circa 2000: [/B]So when you're a country that started at 6% (circa 2000) and now produces, close to 30% of the world's manufacturing [I](with market share projected to rise to 45% by 2030),[/I] as the rest of the world's manufacturing falls [I](and America is projected to fall from 25% (circa 2000) to 11%),[/I] then it [NOPARSE]should be obvious to anyone, YOU'RE going to BURN LIKE 2.8x to 3.5x TIMES MORE COAL (which was the country's most available fuel source), than the next guy, to produce 30-45% the world's [/NOPARSE]goods.[/QUOTE]ChatGPT tells me about 10% of China's CO2 emissions are attributable to exports. To be fair you would need to subtract off the CO2 emissions attributable to Chinese imports, which would make the number even smaller. Chinese invested massive amounts in construction. A lot more people have cars and motorcycles, electric lighting, good heating and air conditioning, etc. Their well being has improved dramatically, thanks to China's carbon economy. That's right, China's a carbon state, not an electrostate. 81% of its energy comes from fossil fuels. 15% is from renewables, and 3% from nuclear.
ChatGPT did not wax lyrical about the carbon economy. I borrowed that from Billy Bob Thornton. Admittedly Billy Bob exaggerated a little.
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmbZwxEnAFc[/URL]
And a final comment about "to China's chagrin, some years later. Huge smog and high CO2 levels engulfed parts of the country. " The majority of Chinese don't give a rats ass about high CO2 levels engulfing parts of their country. (The CO2 rapidly disperses all over the world BTW.) CO2 is colorless, odorless, and non toxic.
What Chinese do care about are levels of particulates, SO2, NOx compounds, and toxic metals, which are harmful to humans and shorten lifespans. I've pointed out to you more than once that the USA, by substituting natural gas for coal, made our air much cleaner. And improved our water too.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059251]Was your city and state immune to and miraculously thrived during The Great Repub Hoover Depression, The Great Repub Reagan Recession, The Great Repub GW Bush Recession, The Muliple Ordinary Repub Recessions and pathetic job growth under Repub Eisenhower, Repub Nixon, Repub Ford, Repub GHW Bush and that bonus one under Repub GW Bush, The Great Repub Trump's Pandemic, the skyrocketing Repub unemployment rates and the millions of jobs wiped out as the result of them? Did they also dodge Repub Eisenhower's Vietnam War, Repub GW Bush's War in Iraq, Repub GW Bush's War in Afghanistan and doing just fine now with Repub Trump's War in Iran? Are you folks still paying Repub Trump's imaginary $1. 99 per gallon for regular gas over there in Hootervile?
Sounds like you live in one of those Red Cities in Red States that Dem Presidents and Dem Congresses gift with extra emergency welfare and economic stimulus during times of inevitable Repub economic and National Security catastrophe. I mean in addition to the half-dozen or so Blue States carrying the load for deadbeat Red States even during normal times.
[B]What Republicans Dont Want To Say: Blue States Are the Ones Bailing Out Red States[/B]
[URL]https://time.com/7222411/blue-states-are-bailing-out-red-states/[/URL]
Tell Aunt Bea, Jethro, Gomer and yourself, "You're welcome" from me and my fellow tax-payers in California, the fourth biggest economy on the planet.[/QUOTE]Then get rid of the federal funds flowing to the states. Let them stand on their own. And decide what their taxpayers' money will be spent on. Move power to the states and cities too. Would you have a problem with that? I bet the end result would be the same as what you see now, migration from places like California to Texas. Comparing those two states, Texans pay 40% less for electricity and gasoline, 60% less for housing, and per capita 65% less for state taxes (source: ChatGPT). Many people will continue to move out of blue states and cities.
The Time article by the way is riddled with falsehoods and misleading statements. Start with the first words, "The red state denial of fiscal responsibility is manifest today. " According to ChatGPT, these states have the highest per capita surpluses: North Dakota, Alaska, Wyoming, Utah, Tennessee. These have the highest deficits: New Jersey, Illinois, Connecticut, Massachusetts and California.
And take this, which you quoted, "However, blue states would do well to remember that it is they who are picking up the bill for red states. Before Republicans start criticizing Democrats about their dependence on federal dollars, a quick review of the facts may be warranted. For instance, while federal dollars to New York represented 38% of its state budget in 2022, Texas received the same proportion, and Florida received even more (40%)"
Wow, Texas received the same proportion of its state budget from the Feds as New York! And Florida got 2% more! Well, duh, if your budget is sky high, like New Jersey, and you get the same percentage of your budget from the federal government as more frugal states, then you're benefitting more from the federal dollars.
Also, the article says that both blue and red states get more from the federal government than they pay the feds. If true, then why is it fair to characterize these gaps as flows of money from blue states to red states? Wouldn't it be better to say federal disbursements to blue states run up the federal deficit less than disbursements to red states? That though wouldn't provide the sense of outrage that the article seeks to convey, "Blue States are the Ones Bailing Out Red States."
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059251]Tell Aunt Bea, Jethro, Gomer and yourself, "You're welcome" from me and my fellow tax-payers in California, the fourth biggest economy on the planet.[/QUOTE]
Adjusted for purchasing power, California's total GDP is now only 24% higher than Texas'. And Texas' GDP per capita, adjusted for purchasing power, is higher than California's. Expect the trend to continue, Texas will gain on California.
Now what was it you were saying about your Aunt Bea? Gomer, who was stationed at Camp Henderson in California, must be retired by now. Is he doing well? Did Jethro ever achieve his ambition of becoming a Hollywood director or double naught spy? I imagine he's still living off family money in Beverly Hills.
-
Disastrous!
Trump's second term is already worse than the first one (which was bad enough that he didn't deserve a second chance), and it has nowhere else to go but even further all the way down the drain due to his stupidity and being surrounded by a bunch of shameless, inept, kiss up lackeys. He basically has only his hardcore, cultish base left. This is [B]ugly[/B], like his Big Ugly (Bullshit) Bill. But, methinks we ain't seen nothing yet. So, buckle up! We still have a long way to go with this clown. Hopefully the midterms will offer up the first major turning point in another direction.
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5811709-trump-approval-rating-iran-war-economy/amp/[/URL]
-
Not great But still better than Biden
[QUOTE=TheCane;3059402]Trump's second term is already worse than the first one (which was bad enough that he didn't deserve a second chance), and it has nowhere else to go but even further all the way down the drain due to his stupidity and being surrounded by a bunch of shameless, inept, kiss up lackeys. He basically has only his hardcore, cultish base left. This is [B]ugly[/B], like his Big Ugly (Bullshit) Bill. But, methinks we ain't seen nothing yet. So, buckle up! We still have a long way to go with this clown. Hopefully the midterms will offer up the first major turning point in another direction.
[URL]https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5811709-trump-approval-rating-iran-war-economy/amp/[/URL][/QUOTE]Trump isn't doing everything correctly but still doing $300% better than Biden. Hopefully when he is done in USA he will come to Canada and fix this country. Unfortunately we have another Trudeau or Biden destroying Canada.
-
2 photos
Ho-hum
Given 1-2 more Repub presidencies or perhaps by the end of the current one, USA minus California will likely have dropped off the top three list altogether and California will move into the 2nd or 3rd place position. Hard to say which position considering what a bang-up job Trump is doing to make China's economy "great, the likes of which no one has ever seen. " Then again, that winning trajectory for California could be reversed if once again a few Californians make the huge mistake of electing a Repub governor.
[B]California overtakes Japan to become the worlds fourth-largest economy[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/25/business/california-japan-economy-tariffs-intl-hnk[/URL]
[QUOTE]California has surpassed Japan to become the worlds fourth-largest economy, Gov. Gavin Newsom said, as he warned of the threat posed by President Donald Trumps tariffs to the tech powerhouses fast-growing wealth.
The Golden States nominal gross domestic product (GDP) reached $4.1 trillion in 2024, according to preliminary data from the US Bureau of Economic Analysis, edging past Japans $4.02 trillion nominal GDP in the same period as recorded by the International Monetary Fund.
That means only the United States, China and Germany have larger economies than [b]California, which outpaced all three countries with growth of 6% last year, according to the release.[/b][/QUOTE]Now I see why my California rental property neighborhood rent rolls keep going up and up no matter how disastrous the Repub national economy.
Of course, anyone who can't cut it in the single greatest state economy in the USA is always welcome and in fact encouraged to move your deadbeat butt to a deadbeat Red state like Texas, get the hell off our crowded freeways, stop cluttering up our housing market and wait for the next disproportional bail-out by the Dems for your new Red state home after the next inevitable Repub economic disaster. You know, because Hootervile, Pixley or whatever Red town Granny got dropped off in her rocker needs it so much more.
[B]Despite Republican opposition, red states fare well in Biden's COVID-19 bill[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/article/world/despite-republican-opposition-red-states-fare-well-in-bidens-covid-19-bill-idUSKBN2B22IZ/[/URL]
[QUOTE]WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Joe Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus aid bill was crafted without Republican input and passed Congress without a single Republican vote. Nevertheless, Republican-leaning states are due to get a disproportionate share of many of its benefits.[/QUOTE][B]Red states are big winners of Bidens landmark laws[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/14/business/manufacturing-jobs-biden[/URL]
[QUOTE]Last month, battery recycling company Redwood Materials broke ground on a $3.5 billion battery plant in South Carolina that is expected to create 1,500 new jobs.
The plant aims to eventually make enough battery components to power more than a million electric vehicles a year. Redwood Materials specifically cited the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, Americas biggest-ever climate investment, as a reason why it decided to build the facility.
This is just one example of a Republican state benefiting from the private investment boom set off by the IRA, a signature legislative achievement for President Joe Biden that every Republican in Congress voted against.
Its part of a broader trend where red states have emerged as big winners from both the IRA and the CHIPS and Science Act, another signature Biden law that passed with some Republican support in 2022.
Most (51%) of the investments directly tied to incentives from the IRA and the CHIPS Act are flowing to Republican states, compared with 20% to blue states, according to a Fitch Ratings analysis shared exclusively with CNN. Fitch defined red states as those that voted for former President Donald Trump in 2020 by more than three percentage points.[/QUOTE]Good jobs created by Dem Presidents and Dem Congresses in Red states that can't otherwise create them on their own are as valid a reason as any for Americans who can't cut it in Blue states to move to those Red states I suppose.
California, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and the Dems offer a heartfelt, "You're welcome, Aunt Bea, Jethro, Gomer, Tiny, Elvis and Granny. "
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059439]Given 1-2 more Repub presidencies or perhaps by the end of the current one, USA minus California will likely have dropped off the top three list altogether and California will move into the 2nd or 3rd place position. Hard to say which position considering what a bang-up job Trump is doing to make China's economy "great, the likes of which no one has ever seen. " Then again, that winning trajectory for California could be reversed if once again a few Californians make the huge mistake of electing a Repub governor.
[B]California overtakes Japan to become the worlds fourth-largest economy[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/25/business/california-japan-economy-tariffs-intl-hnk[/URL]
Now I see why my California rental property neighborhood rent rolls keep going up and up no matter how disastrous the Repub national economy.
Of course, anyone who can't cut it in the single greatest state economy in the USA is always welcome and in fact encouraged to move your deadbeat butt to a deadbeat Red state like Texas, get the hell off our crowded freeways, stop cluttering up our housing market and wait for the next disproportional bail-out by the Dems for your new Red state home after the next inevitable Repub economic disaster. You know, because Hootervile, Pixley or whatever Red town Granny got dropped off in her rocker needs it so much more.
[B]Despite Republican opposition, red states fare well in Biden's COVID-19 bill[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/article/world/despite-republican-opposition-red-states-fare-well-in-bidens-covid-19-bill-idUSKBN2B22IZ/[/URL]
[B]Red states are big winners of Bidens landmark laws[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/14/business/manufacturing-jobs-biden[/URL]
Good jobs created by Dem Presidents and Dem Congresses in Red states that can't otherwise create them on their own are as valid a reason as any for Americans who can't cut it in Blue states to move to those Red states I suppose.
California, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and the Dems offer a heartfelt, "You're welcome, Aunt Bea, Jethro, Gomer, Tiny, Elvis and Granny. "[/QUOTE]It would be great if California became a separate nation! And even better if it took Oregon, Washington and the Northeast with it!
-
Welcome!
[QUOTE=Canada;3059425]Trump isn't doing everything correctly but still doing $300% better than Biden. Hopefully when he is done in USA he will come to Canada and fix this country. Unfortunately we have another Trudeau or Biden destroying Canada.[/QUOTE]He isn't doing everything correctly? Well, that's one huge understatement! And I'm sure he will be welcomed into the warm embrace of the Canadian people! Hahaha!
-
2 photos
Gave up, didn't you.
[QUOTE=Canada;3059425]Trump isn't doing everything correctly but still doing $300% better than Biden. Hopefully when he is done in USA he will come to Canada and fix this country. Unfortunately we have another Trudeau or Biden destroying Canada.[/QUOTE]Remember this?
[QUOTE]Just let your mind go free and please tell us what would have happened to America if the woman who got the most votes in 2016 and the woman who only missed it by less than 0. 75 of a single percentage point of just one demographic of voters spread across the only 3 swing states that mattered in 2024, PA, MI and WI, swinging away from their usual voting pattern had won in 2024.
This ought to be good.[/QUOTE]Couldn't come up with a single thing, right?
Certainly nothing as bad or worse than Trump did to America in his first term and doing now in his second term.
BTW, are you sure you're from Canada and not China or Russia Russia Russia? Just asking, considering how much you're cheerleading for Trump vs somebody like Biden who actually produced historically positive results for the USA and not much good for China and Russia Russia Russia, the exact opposite of what Trump has done in his first and second term.
-
2 photos
BLS officials trying very hard not to get fired by Trump
Hey, there's more "worst since the previous Repub economic disaster" data in the news today!
[B]U.S. payrolls rose by 178,000 in March, more than expected; unemployment at 4.3%[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/03/jobs-report-march-2026-.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]Nonfarm payrolls rose a seasonally adjusted 178,000 in March, a reversal from the [b]133,000 decline in February [/b]and better than the Dow Jones consensus estimate for 59,000.
The unemployment rate edged lower to 4.3%, though[b] that was largely from a sharp reduction in the labor force.[/b]
Wages also rose less than expected, with average hourly earnings up just 0.2% for the month and 3.5% from a year ago. [B]The annual increase was the lowest since May 2021.[/b]
As has been the case, health care was responsible for much of the growth, with the sector adding 76,000 jobs.[/QUOTE]I think many people missed that the February jobs numbers that started out at a terrible MINUS 92,000 got revised down even further to a MINUS 133,000.
I think BLS officials trying desperately to keep their jobs put out some number that approximates the reality that is bound to come out eventually but at least won't throw failed so-called president Trump into more of a blithering, blathering tizzy than he is usually in until he falls asleep through a couple of dozen Dear Leader Cabinet meetings, forgets about it, and then they come out with a downward revision to the real number.
God only knows how far that initial 178,000 jobs number will be revised down to in the end.
Ballpark estimate, it is possible that as it stands now Trump's second horrific term is racking up an average of about 6,000 jobs per month as we approach the halfway point with little reason on the horizon to expect it to improve. Improving upon what they inherit from outgoing Dems, no matter how good the conditions are, just isn't what Repubs do for a living. And least so for Trump. At best, a Dem Majority in the House can at least prevent him and his fellow Repubs in Congress from producing as horrible crap results as they could and definitely would otherwise.
Oh well.
We tried.
-
When MAGA still can't quite get gerrymandering right?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059246]Uh, that's gerrymandering, not DEI.[/QUOTE]Since these great election wins, were Dems, [I][b]flipping ruby red seats,[/b][/I] it must be pretty freakin' bad in Trumpland, when MAGA / Repubs, gerrymander their own ruby red districts, [I]and still cannot win...LOL![/I]
-
Canadian
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059518]Remember this?
Couldn't come up with a single thing, right?
Certainly nothing as bad or worse than Trump did to America in his first term and doing now in his second term.
BTW, are you sure you're from Canada and not China or Russia Russia Russia? Just asking, considering how much you're cheerleading for Trump vs somebody like Biden who actually produced historically positive results for the USA and not much good for China and Russia Russia Russia, the exact opposite of what Trump has done in his first and second term.[/QUOTE]I am Canadian. Biden tried to destroy USA and Trudeau virtually destroyed Canada. Trump has reversed most of Biden's regulations and disasters and USA is doing great. On the other hand Canada has Carney who like every liberal / socialist killing our economy and making Canada more woke every day. Canadian dollar is worth. 71 cents, inflation is high and our health care sucks. I spend the winters in USA and it is 100% better than Canada. You must not live in USA and must only watch leftist fake news or you would seethe truth. If Carney had done in Canada what Trump did in USA we would be one of the richest countries in the world.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: 2024, China exported $180 bn in clean tech energy
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059396]That's ridiculous. Maybe you should study up on verb tenses. "Is" is the [B]present[/B] tense of the verb "to be. ".[/QUOTE][URL]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions[/URL]
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059396]That's right, China's a carbon state, not an electrostate. 81% of its energy comes from fossil fuels. 15% is from renewables, and 3% from nuclear.[/QUOTE]Nonsense! [URL]https://lowcarbonpower.org/region/People%27s_Republic_of_China[/URL]
And a link to your info please!
BTW, when in 2024, China exported $180 bn in clean tech energy, with out a doubt, made them an electrostate. [B]China leads in clean energy exports, overtaking US fossil fuel dominance[/B], October 6th, 2025. [URL]https://www.business-standard.com/world-news/china-leads-in-clean-energy-exports-overtaking-us-fossil-fuel-dominance-125100600095_1.html[/URL].
When in 2024 the [I]U.S.[/I] exported $150 bn in dirty fossil fuels, that still makes it a petrostate and one of the biggest producers and exportors of CO2/ GHG pollution on the plant. Just because the USA, Russia the Saudis, UAE and others, all export or [B]outsource fossil fuels, to be burnt elsewhere in the world,[/B] just means they have a more complicated CO2/ GHG pollution accounting ledger, for burning fossil fuels.
-
California is broke
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059439]Given 1-2 more Repub presidencies or perhaps by the end of the current one, USA minus California will likely have dropped off the top three list altogether and California will move into the 2nd or 3rd place position. Hard to say which position considering what a bang-up job Trump is doing to make China's economy "great, the likes of which no one has ever seen. " Then again, that winning trajectory for California could be reversed if once again a few Californians make the huge mistake of electing a Repub governor.
[B]California overtakes Japan to become the worlds fourth-largest economy[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/25/business/california-japan-economy-tariffs-intl-hnk[/URL]
Now I see why my California rental property neighborhood rent rolls keep going up and up no matter how disastrous the Repub national economy.
Of course, anyone who can't cut it in the single greatest state economy in the USA is always welcome and in fact encouraged to move your deadbeat butt to a deadbeat Red state like Texas, get the hell off our crowded freeways, stop cluttering up our housing market and wait for the next disproportional bail-out by the Dems for your new Red state home after the next inevitable Repub economic disaster.[/QUOTE]California is broke and the laughing stock of USA. Newsome has destroyed California. Stop posting misinformation.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3059562]California is broke and the laughing stock of USA. Newsome has destroyed California. Stop posting misinformation.[/QUOTE]You should consider stopping with the misinformation. Especially with a username like Canada.
California's the biggest economy in the US, with a $4 trillion GDP. If it split off as its own country, it'd be the world's fourth largest—beating Japan. It snags almost 70% of all US venture capital, and seven of the ten biggest investment deals in the Americas last year went down there. Plus, it's outgrown the national economy for four straight quarters.
Sure, it's got serious issues—high unemployment, housing mess, an economy that leaves a lot of folks behind while boosting the top earners. Fair points to debate.
But calling it "broke and the laughingstock of the USA"? That's not a take on a $4 trillion powerhouse growing faster than the rest of the country. That's just a bumper sticker pretending to be deep analysis.
I get that the line between "has problems" and "totally wrecked" might not click right away for you.
-
4 photos
[QUOTE=Canada;3059562]California is broke and the laughing stock of USA. Newsome has destroyed California. Stop posting misinformation.[/QUOTE]LOL. I have consistently provided real news links and screenshots of credibly-sourced charts and graphs supporting my assertions while you have provided absolutely zero to support your bizarro world fantasy that America or its economy or its national security or its foreign policy or anything else about it is or has been better off since Trump took office or when he left office previously than it was under Biden or Obama or Clinton, etc.
The USA is "broke" too but overall not doing nearly as well as California as evidenced by the California GDP Growth vs USA link I provided already.
Other truth-tellers here such as Spidy, The Cane and so on have also provided plenty of substantiation for their assertions for, as an example, the astonishing run of Dem wins and flips of formerly Ruby Red state and local political seats vs no Dem seat flips for Trump's Party since he squeaked out that razor-thin marginal win in November 2024. Which is more evidence for how clearly actual USA Citizens recognize the typically crap Repub / Trump results Trump and his Party have produced vs the previous 4 years.
Here are a few more screenshots to further illustrate how actual USA Citizens see what Trump has wrought without asking any Canadian what his thoroughly unfounded and unsubstantiated bizarro world opinion of it is:
-
Perhaps the unluckiest USA pilot in history
While we hope for a rapid rescue and recovery of the missing USA pilot, let's count a few of the ways he might be the unluckiest USA military member in history.
I say "he" because I assume he is a white male pilot since Trump and his SOW Kegsbreath have purged the military of any other race, ethnicity and gender due to their opinion that any other race, ethnicity or gender just can't start and wage war, er, I mean "a little bit of an excursion", as brilliantly as white, males like Trump and Kegsbreath can.
His Commander-in-Chief is on record publicly admitting he "doesn't like soldiers who get captured". So on the hopeful chance that he survived the crash and was or will be captured it must be comforting for him, his family, friends and fellow military members to know so-called president Trump thinks he is as much of a loser as the heroic war dead in Normandy and elsewhere.
Trump's SOW Kegsbreath is on record establishing the terms and rules of engagement in his and Trump's brilliantly started and waged war, er, I mean "little bit of an excursion", is to offer the enemy "no quarter, no mercy."
Ok. So that means Iran or whoever might capture that USA pilot can pretty much do anything they damn well want with him under cover of potential immunity from worldwide blame or repercussions since, you know, that is exactly what Trump and his SOW Kegsbreath established as the terms and rules of engagement for their war, er, I mean "little bit of an excursion. "
And that is in addition to his and the other USA pilot's fighter jet being shot down by the country their Commander-in-Chief Trump and his SOW Kegsbreath absolutely, positively and with giddy pleasure assured the world they had "obliterated" and left "in ruins" any means for them to shoot down any of America's fighter jets so none of those USA pilots had a thing to worry about every bit as much as no oil tankers passing through the Strait of Hormuz has a thing to worry about since Trump and his SOW Kegsbreath have handled their War, er I mean "little bit of an excursion", of Payback To Netanyahu and Muslims For Being Solely Responsible For Squeaking Out a Razor-Thin Win For Trump In The 2024 Election.
And the fact that one stray bullet or two from those "obliterated" and "in ruins" response forces still somehow managed to fly through and hit a USA fighter jet, well, ok, two USA fighter jets, is probably the unluckiest fluke of all.
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-fighter-jet-shot-down-over-iran-search-underway-crew-us-official-says-2026-04-03/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3059561][URL]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions[/URL][/QUOTE]Well, why don't we ostracize Germans and Mongols, because Hitler and Genghis Khan committed genocide? Because that's history, not the present. Germans and Mongols are very fine people.
If you want say the USA [B]was[/B] the world's biggest CO2 emitter, everyone will agree with you. If you say the USA [B]is[/B] the world's largest CO2 emitter, everyone will think you're on drugs. China BY FAR is the largest. Again,
[URL]https://www.climate.gov/media/15559[/URL]
[QUOTE=Spidy;3059561]Nonsense! [URL]https://lowcarbonpower.org/region/People%27s_Republic_of_China[/URL]
And a link to your info please![/QUOTE]I clearly said 81% of [B]energy[/B], not electricity, was from fossil fuels. Your link looks at % of electricity.
I got the numbers from ChatGPT. I went back and asked it for links. It gave this.
[URL]https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89nergie_en_Chine[/URL]
For 2023,
Fossil Fuels 87.1%
Renewables including Hydro 10.1%
Nuclear 2. 8%
Or take a look at your source, Our World in Data. I believe if you do that you'll get numbers closer to the ones ChatGPT quoted to me earlier.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3059561]BTW, when in 2024, China exported $180 bn in clean tech energy, with out a doubt, made them an electrostate. [B]China leads in clean energy exports, overtaking US fossil fuel dominance[/B], October 6th, 2025. [URL]https://www.business-standard.com/world-news/china-leads-in-clean-energy-exports-overtaking-us-fossil-fuel-dominance-125100600095_1.html[/URL].
When in 2024 the [I]U.S.[/I] exported $150 bn in dirty fossil fuels, that still makes it a petrostate and one of the biggest producers and exportors of CO2/ GHG pollution on the plant. Just because the USA, Russia the Saudis, UAE and others, all export or [B]outsource fossil fuels, to be burnt elsewhere in the world,[/B] just means they have a more complicated CO2/ GHG pollution accounting ledger, for burning fossil fuels.[/QUOTE]The USA is a net importer of crude oil. If you look at crude oil and products refined from crude oil, the trade balance is roughly equal. Exports are about equal to imports.
So if you remove oil from the equation, natural gas accounts for most of net exports. And as I've already told you several times, combustion of gas releases A LOT less SO2, NOx, particulates and harmful metals into the environment than the coal that accounts for the majority of China's energy production. Furthermore, compared to coal, combustion of gas releases less CO2 per MMBTU.
USA Exports of coal are small compared to liquefied natural gas, and a little over 50% is metallurgical grade coal. At this point in time, there really isn't a substitute for met coal in steelmaking and the like.
So the USA, through exports of natural gas which substitute for coal, is doing its part to clean up the air and, to a lesser extent, lower carbon emissions. And China is doing more through exports of solar panels and the like. But at the same time China is emitting massive amounts of harmful pollutants and colorless, odorless, non toxic CO2 by burning coal. Who's the winner overall? If your only goal was to clean up air and lower carbon emissions, would you drop nuclear bombs on the USA and wipe it from the planet? Or annihilate China? Clearly, you'd have to do away with China. I could quantify that, but since you're not going to believe me and since it's a waste of time anyway, I won't.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3059562]California is broke and the laughing stock of USA. Newsome has destroyed California. Stop posting misinformation.[/QUOTE]Who's the bigger dumb ass, Trudeau or Newsome? Darn it, that's a hard one to answer!
I believe you should move to Alberta, if you don't live there already. Canada and the United States should be disbanded. Out of the ashes we form two countries. We will call one Middle America (also known as God's Country), and it will consist of Alberta, the Rockies except Colorado, and the South. The second will be Dumb Ass America, which will comprise the rest of Canada and the USA. The big question will be whether the capitol of Dumb Ass America will be Sacramento or Ottawa. Probably Sacramento, since it's the most fucked up.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;3059500]He isn't doing everything correctly? Well, that's one huge understatement! And I'm sure he will be welcomed into the warm embrace of the Canadian people! Hahaha![/QUOTE]When he really seems involved in Epstein affair, maybe we will need to leave Florida to hide in deep north Canada. He can try golf in snow.
-
Budget deficit $18 billion going to $35 billion in 2027
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059574]LOL. I have consistently provided real news links and screenshots of credibly-sourced charts and graphs supporting my assertions while you have provided absolutely zero to support your bizarro world fantasy that America or its economy or its national security or its foreign policy or anything else about it is or has been better off since Trump took office or when he left office previously than it was under Biden or Obama or Clinton, etc.
The USA is "broke" too but overall not doing nearly as well as California as evidenced by the California GDP Growth vs USA link I provided already.
Other truth-tellers here such as Spidy, The Cane and so on have also provided plenty of substantiation for their assertions for, as an example, the astonishing run of Dem wins and flips of formerly Ruby Red state and local political seats vs no Dem seat flips for Trump's Party since he squeaked out that razor-thin marginal win in November 2024. Which is more evidence for how clearly actual USA Citizens recognize the typically crap Repub / Trump results Trump and his Party have produced vs the previous 4 years.
Here are a few more screenshots to further illustrate how actual USA Citizens see what Trump has wrought without asking any Canadian what his thoroughly unfounded and unsubstantiated bizarro world opinion of it is:[/QUOTE]Here is California bad news. Budget deficit $18 billion going to $$35 billion in 2027. High employment 5.3% and rich people leaving the state in droves. Look at the link. Don't be lazy. Just google it and 20 + news posts on California debt and financial problems. Big economy but Newsome policies driving it to ruins. Rich people leaving and illegals arriving to their sanctuary cities. This is common knowledge everywhere but on fake news.
[URL]https://calmatters.org/politics/2025/12/california-budget-primer/[/URL]
-
Trudeau worse than Newsome
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059594]Who's the bigger dumb ass, Trudeau or Newsome? Darn it, that's a hard one to answer!
I believe you should move to Alberta, if you don't live there already. Canada and the United States should be disbanded. Out of the ashes we form two countries. We will call one Middle America (also known as God's Country), and it will consist of Alberta, the Rockies except Colorado, and the South. The second will be Dumb Ass America, which will comprise the rest of Canada and the USA. The big question will be whether the capitol of Dumb Ass America will be Sacramento or Ottawa. Probably Sacramento, since it's the most fucked up.[/QUOTE]I am from Alberta and it would be great if Alberta was part of USA. USA should trade Colorado, CA, Oregon and Washington for Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Yukon. USA could throw in Minnesota too. Canada is ripping off Alberta royally.
-
1 photos
Uh. Yeah, we all knew that already and never denied it.
[QUOTE=Canada;3059710]Here is California bad news. Budget deficit $18 billion going to $$35 billion in 2027. High employment 5.3% and rich people leaving the state in droves. Look at the link. Don't be lazy. Just google it and 20 + news posts on California debt and financial problems. Big economy but Newsome policies driving it to ruins. Rich people leaving and illegals arriving to their sanctuary cities. This is common knowledge everywhere but on fake news.
[URL]https://calmatters.org/politics/2025/12/california-budget-primer/[/URL][/QUOTE]First of all, congratulations for finally coming up with a link for something rather than laying back in your barcalounger with a Tim Horton donut and merely rhapsodizing utter nonsense pro Trump fantasies.
However, nobody has denied that California is in debt, least of all me.
But California's debt and deficits are far less than 1/50th of the debt and deficits racked up by Trump for the USA. And combined with its growth surpassing that of all three of the only larger economies on the planet it is in a better position to close that gap than a country being "led" by Donald Trump:
[B]U.S. hits $38 trillion in debt, after the fastest accumulation of $1 trillion outside of the pandemic.[/B]
[URL]https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/u-s-hits-38-trillion-in-debt-after-the-fastest-accumulation-of-1-trillion-outside-of-the-pandemic[/URL]
And don't think this is something new for Trump. All of the supposedly "deficit hawk" Repub / MAGA voters knew that about Trump before 77 million of them begged for more of it the 2nd time around:
[B]Donald Trump Built a National Debt So Big (Even Before the Pandemic) That It'll Weigh Down the Economy for Years.
The King of Debt promised to reduce the national debt then his tax cuts made it surge. Add in the pandemic, and he oversaw the third-biggest deficit increase of any president.[/B]
[URL]https://www.propublica.org/article/national-debt-trump[/URL]
Add to the above that Trump actually ushered in and exacerbated the deaths, worldwide economic devastation, closures, supply-chain collapse and the global hyper-inflation that followed Trump's Pandemic in the first place by defunding and removing the highly effective Pandemic Prevention and Response teams leadership from those Chinese labs in 2019 contrary to all expert warnings for him not to do something so dangerous and stupid. And then he admitted in a March 2020 recorded interview that monitoring and communication about those earliest Covid-19 cases, made impossible thanks only to him, "just 2 months sooner and we would not have had any of this trouble. We could have stopped it easily. "
So the debt and deficits due to Trump's Pandemic and the recovery from it belongs to him too! Since you are no longer lazy about researching things, do a Google Search and a search in this forum for plenty of links, mostly by me here, for when and how Trump converted a likely manageable epidemic confined to one region in China into the out-of-control Trump's Pandemic it became.
Do your neighbors in Canada know you are cheerleading and hoping for higher gas and grocery prices, a higher rate of inflation, near stalled jobs creation for more than a year so far, skyrocketing more debt and deficits with zero to show for it, another no-win quagmire unprovoked Repub War of Choice and so on to be brought to them in Canada as Trump brought it to the USA and is infecting the rest of the world with it as well?
The graph below is based only on Trump's 1st disastrous term. He is just getting started on adding to the debt and deficits for his 2nd disastrous term and is already asking his Repub MAGA Congress for more! Bear in mind that after Trump jacked up the debt and deficits more than any other president in a single term he got his ass kicked out of office with millions fewer jobs in the economy than when he took office, a 100 year record "accomplishment" he appears determined to repeat in his 2nd disastrous term.
And you want that for Canada.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3059711]I am from Alberta and it would be great if Alberta was part of USA. USA should trade Colorado, CA, Oregon and Washington for Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Yukon. USA could throw in Minnesota too. Canada is ripping off Alberta royally.[/QUOTE]That's a great idea! It's a win win deal! Even Spidy should like it because with Alberta he'll finally have some justification to call the USA a petrostate.
Would it be OK if we kicked in New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Vermont too? I think that's only fair since you're throwing in Saskatchewan, Manitoba and the Yukon. Also Canada can have Washington D.C. It would be great to ship Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and the Squad to Ottawa!
-
Only a Grade A fool and traitor would write the Stoopid shit you post
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059581]While we hope for a rapid rescue and recovery of the missing USA pilot, let's count a few of the ways he might be the unluckiest USA military member in history.
I say "he" because I assume he is a white male pilot since Trump and his SOW Kegsbreath have purged the military of any other race, ethnicity and gender due to their opinion that any other race, ethnicity or gender just can't start and wage war, er, I mean "a little bit of an excursion", as brilliantly as white, males like Trump and Kegsbreath can.
His Commander-in-Chief is on record publicly admitting he "doesn't like soldiers who get captured". So on the hopeful chance that he survived the crash and was or will be captured it must be comforting for him, his family, friends and fellow military members to know so-called president Trump thinks he is as much of a loser as the heroic war dead in Normandy and elsewhere.
Trump's SOW Kegsbreath is on record establishing the terms and rules of engagement in his and Trump's brilliantly started and waged war, er, I mean "little bit of an excursion", is to offer the enemy "no quarter, no mercy.[/QUOTE]Yes there's a big difference between being shot down and parachuting out and being a coward and a traitor to your country like John McCain and yourself.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-search-operations-missing-pilot-continue-israel-launches-new-strikes[/URL]
-
DEI is cancerous dogshit
[QUOTE=Spidy;3058977][B]Hegseth Strikes Two Black and Two Female Officers From Promotion,[/B] March 27th, 2026 [URL]https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/27/us/hegseth-promotion-list.html[/URL]
Just take the latest round of racist and sexist behavior from a Repub party in drastic decline, and that should tell you, pretty much, most of what you need to know about MAGA / Repubs, where white male dumbass blind loyalty is the ONLY so called [I]"political currency"[/I] of worth, that is wanted or welded, by a corrupt, racist and xenophobic party.
Hear, Hear!
[I]March 23, 2026,[/I] [B]The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it [/B] [I]"The USA Government is insolvent. That's not hyperbole it's the conclusion drawn directly from the Treasury Department's own consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2025, released last week to near-total media silence. The numbers: $6. 06 trillion in total assets against $47.78 trillion in total liabilities as of September 30,2025."[/I] [URL]https://fortune.com/2026/03/23/us-government-insolvent-fiscal-crisis-fix/[/URL]
This is why the MAGA Fuhrer, loves his MAGA suckers, as he, his cronies and his billionaire pickpocketers, bleed the country dry.[/QUOTE]It destroys anything it comes into contact with.
[URL]https://www.latimes.com/sports/story/2026-04-01/umpire-cb-bucknor-leaves-game-with-injury-day-after-abs-replay-humbled-him[/URL]
-
3 photos
Trump is so unhappy about this
USA boots on the ground! That didn't take long.
As usual, good news for most Americans is bad news for Trump and his fellow Repubs.
Just as Repub Eisenhower put USA military personnel directly in harms way in Vietnam in order to ensure that eventually something, anything would happen to enough of them that the American people would "rally 'round the flag" in greater support for his unprovoked, no-win, quagmire, Repub Vietnam War of Choice, so too has and is Repub Trump doing exactly the same thing but worse and more of it with his Repub Iran War of Choice.
So the one person we can be 100% sure is unhappy about this rescue is Donald J. Trump, who most assuredly was hoping for a much worse outcome for any and all USA military members in the region, all "losers" anyway according to him, rather than merely demonstrating what shameless liars Trump and his SOW Kegsbreath were about how their military controls the air and sea and can do anything he wants it to do since they have "obliterated" and left "in ruins" Iran's ability to shoot at them.
The same lies those two liars keep telling about how safe the Strait of Hormuz is.
[B]Missing U.S. crew member from downed fighter jet rescued in Iran, Trump says.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/missing-u-s-crew-member-from-downed-fighter-jet-rescued-in-iran-sources-say/[/URL]
Well, at least Trump must be delighted that he got USA Boots on the Ground, contrary to his and Kegsbreath's lies about that too, so fast, "the likes of which nobody has ever seen before."But he'll have to rachet up the deadly harm to those "losers", according to him, in the USA military if he is going to acheive the desired effect of fully changing the subject of the Epstein Files and rally support for his no-win Repub War of Choice.
-
Easter Message
Happy Easter everyone!
[URL]https://www.rawstory.com/amp/trump-2676666832-2676666832[/URL]
-
3 photos
A timely. Worst Since a Previous Repub Disaster metric
Well, well. It seems Trump's America has hit another "Worst Since a Previous Repub Disaster" record.
Similar to his "Worst Repub Economy Since The Great Repub Depression" accomplishment in his first term, leaving office in 2021, after waging his unprecedented Bloody War Against America and Democracy on American Soil, that is, with millions fewer jobs in the USA economy than were in it four years earlier, this time around his disastrous economic and national security results have caused more American Citizens to flee Trump's America, "the likes of which nobody has ever seen" or at least since The Great Repub Depression. Again.
[B]Americans Are Leaving the U.S. in Record Numbers.
Feb. 25, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/us-news/americans-leaving-the-us-migration-a5795bfa[/URL]
[QUOTE]In its 250th year, is America, land of immigration, becoming a country of emigration?
[B]Last year the U.S. experienced something that hasnt definitively occurred since the Great Depression:[/b] More people moved out than moved in. The Trump administration has hailed the exodusnegative net migrationas the fulfillment of its promise to ramp up deportations and restrict new visas. Beneath the stormy optics of that immigration crackdown, however, lies a less-noticed reversal: [b]Americas own citizens are leaving in record numbers, replanting themselves and their families in lands they find more affordable and safe.[/b][/QUOTE]The number of people exiting California is nothing compared to what Trump has done for American Citizens getting the hell out of America.
Oh, Trump's America is also broke.
And Trump's America's debt and deficits are also at record highs.
Thanks mostly to Trump's disastrous, fraudulent, wasteful and abusive Repub economic policies the first time around, this time around and not even counting the economic catastrophe of his Trump's Pandemic.
-
Canada was already in worse shape than USA.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059727]First of all, congratulations for finally coming up with a link for something rather than laying back in your barcalounger with a Tim Horton donut and merely rhapsodizing utter nonsense pro Trump fantasies.
However, nobody has denied that California is in debt, least of all me.
But California's debt and deficits are far less than 1/50th of the debt and deficits racked up by Trump for the USA. And combined with its growth surpassing that of all three of the only larger economies on the planet it is in a better position to close that gap than a country being "led" by Donald Trump:
[B]U.S. hits $38 trillion in debt, after the fastest accumulation of $1 trillion outside of the pandemic.[/B]
[URL]https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/u-s-hits-38-trillion-in-debt-after-the-fastest-accumulation-of-1-trillion-outside-of-the-pandemic[/URL]
And don't think this is something new for Trump. All of the supposedly "deficit hawk" Repub / MAGA voters knew that about Trump before 77 million of them begged for more of it the 2nd time around:.[/QUOTE]Yes we would love to have Trump in Canada just like numerous other countries. He has done more for USA than any other president since Reagan. When gas in USA was $2 a gallon 6 weeks ago our gas was $5 a gallon like CA. Now we are $6-$7 a gallon. Inflation is higher here and our dollar is worth 71 cents in USA and 60 cents in Europe. Trump has closed your borders and has made huge economic gain after the Biden train wreck. The TDS that the socialists and traitors that that hate USA keep writing fake posts and try to block all his actions making America great. Democrats are hoping Trump fails and are doing everything in their power to make America and Americans fail. For every great thing Trump does in the world there is an USA hater writing fake posts and fake news. Any country in the world would be happy to have Trump make their country great. Unfortunately we have Carney a loser like Biden.
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3059739]
Only a Grade A fool and traitor would write the Stoopid shit you post
Yes there's a big difference between being shot down and parachuting out and being a coward and a traitor to your country like John McCain and yourself.
[URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/us-search-operations-missing-pilot-continue-israel-launches-new-strikes[/URL][/QUOTE]You should read "How to Win Friends and Influence People," by Dale Carnegie.
McCain was a POW for over 5 years. When he ejected from his aircraft he broke both arms and a leg, and received little medical care. The NVA offered him early release because his father was an admiral and he told them to stuff it. He could have avoided torture and solitary confinement by giving propaganda statements. But he did not.
Now McCain did fuck up when he kicked off the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax by passing on the Steele dossier to James Comey. Recall that the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton Campaign funded said dossier. Still Trump had no reason to say what he did about McCain, "He's not a war hero. I like people who weren't captured. " That's rich coming from someone who used bone spurs to avoid getting drafted.
If you are as wrong about Tooms as you are about McCain, our man in Bangkok must be a true patriot. Sadly misguided, but a patriot none the less.
-
3 photos
Oops. Back to just the barcalounger?
[QUOTE=Canada;3059820]Yes we would love to have Trump in Canada just like numerous other countries. He has done more for USA than any other president since Reagan. When gas in USA was $2 a gallon 6 weeks ago our gas was $5 a gallon like CA. Now we are $6-$7 a gallon. Inflation is higher here and our dollar is worth 71 cents in USA and 60 cents in Europe. Trump has closed your borders and has made huge economic gain after the Biden train wreck. The TDS that the socialists and traitors that that hate USA keep writing fake posts and try to block all his actions making America great. Democrats are hoping Trump fails and are doing everything in their power to make America and Americans fail. For every great thing Trump does in the world there is an USA hater writing fake posts and fake news. Any country in the world would be happy to have Trump make their country great. Unfortunately we have Carney a loser like Biden.[/QUOTE]And you were doing so well with that one post containing a link.
Please tell us where "gas was $2 a gallon six weeks ago" in the USA. And please be specific with a link, a chart, anything.
Please cite when and where in the USA Trump made "huge economic gains" from the "train wreck" Biden-Harris handed him. Did you mean for Trump himself, his family and a few billionaires? Because that fact is undeniable and is charted on a monthly basis in the media. However, it certainly hasn't been in jobs creation, business bankruptcies reduction, wage gains, GDP Growth, a lower rate of inflation or lowering the prices for most other items including gas and groceries.
The average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA is higher now under Trump than all but about 3-4 months in 2022 under Biden. And the reason for it in 2022 had nothing to do with Biden while the reason for it today has everything to do with Trump.
The rate of inflation was 2.9% at the Biden-Harris handoff to Trump. In 2025 it was 3.0%. You know which one is higher, right?
So where were these "huge economic gains" in the USA under Trump vs the Envy of the World Economy he inherited from Biden-Harris? And, again, please be specific with a link, a chart, anything.
[B]441 days into Donald Trump's term
GDP grew at 0.7% per year in Q4. Inflation is at 3.0%. The unemployment rate is 4.3%. The S&P 500 is up 8.8% since he took office.[/B]
[URL]https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker/economy[/URL]
[B]Wages grew in March, but more slowly than they have in years.
The danger is that inflation will overtake wage growth, which would mean Americans overall would have less money for discretionary spending.[/B]
[URL]https://www.marketplace.org/story/2026/04/03/wages-grew-in-march-but-more-slowly-than-they-have-in-years[/URL]
[QUOTE]He said slowing wage growth makes sense in a slow job market.
Gross hires are very low by historical standards, and so its very hard for people to go and find a better-paying job on the open market, Zhao said.
The bigger concern isnt that wage growth is slowing its that its slowing while inflation is creeping up, said economist Courtney Shupert at MacroPolicy Perspectives.
Thats a hit to disposable income and a hit to consumer purchasing power, she said.[/QUOTE][B]Trump has Americans missing Biden's economy. No, really.
A new Harvard CAPS/Harris survey found more than half of U.S. voters think the economy is worse under Trump than it was under Biden. And 62% blame the current state of the economy on Trump, not Biden.[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/04/01/trump-economy-biden-polling/89422748007/[/URL]
[QUOTE]Trump can shout that the economy is roaring and America is the hottest country in the world until he's more orange than usual in the face, but it's clear that, like cheap MAGA merchandise, nobody's buying it.[/QUOTE]
-
The re-education of Eih Tooms, Part 1
Excerpt from a Letter to the Editor:
At Unleash Prosperity, we've examined the cumulative change in net income from Internal Revenue Service data from the years 2012-23. These data quantify the massive wealth transfer from high-tax to low-tax states due to interstate migration.
Florida gained a net $1 trillion increase in income from new entrants minus those who left. Texas was runner up with a nearly $300 billion cumulative income gain. Neither state imposes an income tax.
Meanwhile, two of the highest income tax states, [b]California[/b] and New York, [b]lost more than $500 billion[/b] and nearly $400 billion respectively over the same period. These losses keep accumulating year after year because the migration is almost all in one direction. The low-tax states are plundering the tax base of the high-tax states.
Over the past few decades, I've debated many of the most leftist economists in the country, and they consistently don't have a good answer to this question: [B]If blue states high-tax policies create a workers paradise, why is everyone leaving?[/B].
Stephen Moore.
[URL]https://www.wsj.com/opinion/the-blue-state-exodus-enriches-red-states-618d5c74?mod=Searchresults&pos=1&page=1[/URL]
-
1 photos
I dare you to fly back to the USA
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059746]USA boots on the ground! That didn't take long.
As usual, good news for most Americans is bad news for Trump and his fellow Repubs.
Just as Repub Eisenhower put USA military personnel directly in harms way in Vietnam in order to ensure that eventually something, anything would happen to enough of them that the American people would "rally 'round the flag" in greater support for his unprovoked, no-win, quagmire, Repub Vietnam War of Choice, so too has and is Repub Trump doing exactly the same thing but worse and more of it with his Repub Iran War of Choice.
So the one person we can be 100% sure is unhappy about this rescue is Donald J. Trump, who most assuredly was hoping for a much worse outcome for any and all USA military members in the region, all "losers" anyway according to him, rather than merely demonstrating what shameless liars Trump and his SOW Kegsbreath were about how their military controls the air and sea and can do anything he wants it to do since they have "obliterated" and left "in ruins" Iran's ability to shoot at them.
The same lies those two liars keep telling about how safe the Strait of Hormuz is.
[B]Missing U.S. crew member from downed fighter jet rescued in Iran, Trump says.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cbsnews.com/news/missing-u-s-crew-member-from-downed-fighter-jet-rescued-in-iran-sources-say/[/URL]
Well, at least Trump must be delighted that he got USA Boots on the Ground, contrary to his and Kegsbreath's lies about that too, so fast, "the likes of which nobody has ever seen before."But he'll have to rachet up the deadly harm to those "losers", according to him, in the USA military if he is going to acheive the desired effect of fully changing the subject of the Epstein Files and rally support for his no-win Repub War of Choice.[/QUOTE]Bangkok Bob aka Tokyo Rose.
[URL]https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/04/04/democrats-are-openly-rooting-for-iran-to-win-the-war-n4951442[/URL]#google_vignette.
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/scottpowell/ccp-venezuela-iran/2026/04/02/id/1251621/[/URL]
-
2 photos
LOL. Please, Donnie-boy, don't TACO out on this one!
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059867]Excerpt from a Letter to the Editor:
At Unleash Prosperity, we've examined the cumulative change in net income from Internal Revenue Service data from the years 2012-23. These data quantify the massive wealth transfer from high-tax to low-tax states due to interstate migration.
Florida gained a net $1 trillion increase in income from new entrants minus those who left. Texas was runner up with a nearly $300 billion cumulative income gain. Neither state imposes an income tax.
Meanwhile, two of the highest income tax states, [b]California[/b] and New York, [b]lost more than $500 billion[/b] and nearly $400 billion respectively over the same period. These losses keep accumulating year after year because the migration is almost all in one direction. The low-tax states are plundering the tax base of the high-tax states.[/QUOTE]States such as California, New York and Massachusetts that carry the load for deadbeat Red states that deadbeat Repubs flee to in order to be more deadbeat among other deadbeats are hoping and praying that deadbeat Repub Trump finally sticks to this proposal:
[B]Trump says it's 'not possible' for the U.S. to pay for Medicaid, Medicare and day care: 'Were fighting wars'.
Trump urged states to fund benefits programs instead because "we have to take care of one thing: military protection."[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-says-not-possible-us-pay-medicaid-medicare-daycare-re-fighting-w-rcna266381[/URL]
[QUOTE]Later in his remarks, the president added that states would have to raise their taxes to pay for child care costs and that the federal government could lower our taxes a little bit to them to make up for it.
Its not possible for us to take care of day care, Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things, Trump said. They can do it on a state basis. You cant do it on a federal. We have to take care of one thing: military protection. We have to guard the country.[/QUOTE]Perfect! I sure hope he is somehow including Social Security in the mix.
I hate to break it to economic numbskulls like Stephen Moore but the Blue states that keep America going and carry the load for deadbeat Red states will do just fine and dandy thank you very much under his Cult Leader's proposal. In fact, better than ever! Meanwhile, those deadbeat Red states will be in a world of Trumpian Deadbeat Repub pain from it. Aww. Too bad.
Please, please, please oh please, Donnie-boy, don't TACO out on this one good idea you might have ever come up with!
Lolololol.
-
American (leftwing) Woman
I almost feel sorry for Newsom. This is what he has to come home to every night. 555/ KKK. [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJY0a1S8afo&t=23s[/URL]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzWHE32IxUc&t=4s[/URL]
-
The re-educaton of Eih Tooms, part 2
Just comparing numbers for states doesn't make sense. A place like the PRA (Peoples Republic of Austin) benefits from efficient, Republican state governance. However at the county and municipal level, Democrats rule the show. In my well run-county, all levels of government are controlled by Republican politicians, many of which are businessmen and women.
So, for grins, with help from industrial strength ChatGPT (the $200/month subscription version), I decided to compare my county to blue California, and to blue Travis County, which includes Austin. Here are the estimates.
[b]My County (God's country)[/b]
Unemployment: 3% to 3.5%
Per Capita personal income: $144,000
Federal taxes per person: $42,000 to $49,000
Federal disbursements to residents, per person: $9,500 to $10,500
[b]People's Republic of California (PRC)[/b]
Unemployment 5.5%
Per Capita personal income: $82,000
Federal taxes per person: $22,500 to $25,000
Federal disbursements to residents, per person: $13,500
[b]People's Republic of Austin (PRA)[/b]
Unemployment 3% to 3.5%
Per capita personal income: $82,000
Federal taxes per person: $21,000 to $24,000
Federal disbursements to residents, per person: $10,500 to $12,000
ChatGPT says the federal per person disbursements are less than the receipts because of items like defense and intelligence that benefit the whole nation, not individuals in a particular state or county.
So, the hard working people in my deep red county and the businesses here pay $35,500 per person more to the feds than we get back. The deadbeats in California and Austin only pay about $10,000 to $11,000 more than they take in. We're getting fucked.
You could pick and choose states or counties and come to the opposite conclusion though, say by comparing San Mateo county to some poor as shit place in Mississippi.
In reality, there's not much difference in how much Republicans and Democrats pay into the system and take out. ChatGPT's estimates for average federal tax per person are
Democrats $18,000 to $24,000
Republicans $20,000 to $26,000
And its estimates for federal benefits per person are
Democrats $12,000 to $15,000
Republicans $13,000 to $16,000
Please note that people pay in more than they get back. While admittedly some of this is attributable to "benefits" from defense spending and the like, I'd argue it's also an indication of how wasteful and inefficient the federal government is. Older, wiser Americans (you excepted) are more likely to vote Republican, and younger Democrat. So the Republicans per capita get more from Medicare and Social Security and the Democrats more from welfare.
The MSM and LWM (Main Stream Media and Left WINGER Media) sources you read point towards red states and counties paying more than blue states and counties. These are based on GDP allocated to states and counties. County data for GDP are much easier to come by than taxes or personal income for counties. Part of the problem with this is that GDP disproportionately gets allocated to company's headquarter cities, and cities are predominantly blue. For example, GDP generated by Wells Fargo, Apple, and Google is disproportionately allocated to the San Francisco Bay area. JP Morgan's to New York City. And ExxonMobil's to blue Harris County (Houston). That's even though the majority or most of Exxon's management, employees and ultimate beneficial owners are Republicans.
Also, you have Democratic and Republican voters in cities. Maybe like in Houston, the majority of the highly productive, highest taxpaying individuals are Republicans, while a majority of lower income individuals are Democrats.
In any event, the reality is that Republicans and Democrats contribute and receive about the same. And sadly the MSM and LWM have convinced you otherwise.
-
I saved $200 per month and simply looked at the historical facts.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059975]Just comparing numbers for states doesn't make sense. A place like the PRA (Peoples Republic of Austin) benefits from efficient, Republican state governance. However at the county and municipal level, Democrats rule the show. In my well run-county, all levels of government are controlled by Republican politicians, many of which are businessmen and women.
So, for grins, with help from industrial strength ChatGPT (the $200/month subscription version), I decided to compare my county to blue California, and to blue Travis County, which includes Austin. Here are the estimates.
[b]My County (God's country)[/b]
Unemployment: 3% to 3.5%
Per Capita personal income: $144,000
Federal taxes per person: $42,000 to $49,000
Federal disbursements to residents, per person: $9,500 to $10,500
[b]People's Republic of California (PRC)[/b]
Unemployment 5.5%
Per Capita personal income: $82,000
Federal taxes per person: $22,500 to $25,000
Federal disbursements to residents, per person: $13,500
[b]People's Republic of Austin (PRA)[/b]
Unemployment 3% to 3.5%
Per capita personal income: $82,000
Federal taxes per person: $21,000 to $24,000
Federal disbursements to residents, per person: $10,500 to $12,000
ChatGPT says the federal per person disbursements are less than the receipts because of items like defense and intelligence that benefit the whole nation, not individuals in a particular state or county.
So, the hard working people in my deep red county and the businesses here pay $35,500 per person more to the feds than we get back. The deadbeats in California and Austin only pay about $10,000 to $11,000 more than they take in. We're getting fucked.
You could pick and choose states or counties and come to the opposite conclusion though, say by comparing San Mateo county to some poor as shit place in Mississippi..[/QUOTE]In my country where a Democrat occupies the White House and Democrats hold the Majority in the House and Senate over the past 100 years:
There were no Great Depressions.
There were no Great Recessions.
There were no Massive Job Losses.
There was no Trump's Pandemic.
There was no Vietnam War.
There was no Attack on 9/11.
There was no Iraq War.
There was no Afghanistan War.
There was no Iran War.
There was no skyrocketing crime rate in 2020.
All cities, counties and states in the USA benefitted accordingly.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: The USA's largest / biggest cumulative CO2 emissions!
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059591]If you want say the USA [B]was[/B] the world's biggest CO2 emitter, everyone will agree with you. If you say the USA [B]is[/B] the world's largest CO2 emitter, everyone will think you're on drugs. China BY FAR is the largest. Again, [URL]https://www.climate.gov/media/15559[/URL] [/QUOTE]"Potayto, potahto, tomato, tomahto". Once again, your failure to understand basic meaning of [B][i]"cumulative",[/i][/B] I first posted, in the link clearly entitled: [B]Our World in Data: Cumulative CO2 emissions:[/B] [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions[/URL], is indeed astounding.
Allow me to add the following [I](Courtesy of Google Search)[/I] in case you still, like to use conjecture and phrases like "potayto, potahto":
Yes, it is accurate that while China is currently the world's largest annual emitter of, [B]the United States and Europe hold the highest cumulative emissions in history[/B]. Because remains in the atmosphere for centuries, historical emissions are a major contributor to current global warming. [B]Who has contributed most to global CO2 emissions?[/B] Oct 2019 [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/contributed-most-global-co2[/URL] OR [B]Which countries have contributed the most to historical CO2 emissions?[/B] Mar 17th, 2025 [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/which-countries-have-contributed-the-most-to-historical-co-emissions[/URL].
Historical vs. Annual Emissions Key Points:
[LIST]Historical Top Emitter: The United States is the largest cumulative emitter, responsible for roughly one-quarter (approx. 20-25%) of all historical emissions since 1750.
[url]https://ourworldindata.org/contributed-most-global-co2[/url][/LIST][LIST]Europe's Role: European countries, particularly the UK and Germany, were the dominant emitters between 1750 and 1850, leading to a high total accumulation.[/LIST][LIST]China's Rise: While China only recently became a major emitter, its rapid industrialization has caused it to overtake the EU27 in historical cumulative emissions to become the second-largest contributor.[/LIST][LIST]The Gap: Despite China's rapid rise, the U.S. cumulative total is still significantly higher roughly twice as much as China's.[/LIST][LIST]Per Capita Difference: [b]On a per capita basis, U.S. cumulative emissions are far higher than China's,[/b] as China's emissions are spread over a much larger population.[/LIST]In short, [B]the U.S.[/B] and [B]Europe[/B] bear the primary responsibility for the current stock of in the atmosphere, while China is the largest contributor to the current annual flow of emissions.
Note: The above passage, was Courtesy of Google Search (with links in [U]English[/U] to the related subject).
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059591]I clearly said 81% of [B]energy[/B], not electricity, was from fossil fuels. Your link looks at % of electricity.
I got the numbers from ChatGPT. I went back and asked it for links. It gave this.
[URL]https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89nergie_en_Chine[/URL].[/QUOTE]Sorry, I've only been able to read French, at high school grade level. But if you're just throwing out links, just because ChatGOP told you so, and your lazy ass, didn't want verify whatever garage it tells you, then that's on you!
I see "primary energy" as more of a fossil fuel fallacy. The electricity energy mix is better comparative mix. But if you like, I can just throw you a bone or two and give you many of my in links in Chinese (or French for that matter), if that's more to ChatGOP's (or your) liking?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059591]I clearly said 81% of [b]energy,[/b] ... The USA is a net importer of crude oil. If you look at crude oil and products refined from crude oil, the trade balance is roughly equal. Exports are about equal to imports. ...[/QUOTE]Note that "energy" or primary energy, is not even close to being the same [I][b]final energy,[/b][/I] OR [I][b]useful energy.[/b][/I] Nor does it have anything to do with China being an electrostate or producing electrotech, other than fossil fuels (prime energy) molecules being 3 x less efficient at generating electricity, than electrons.
So while your post goes off into the weeds, talking about, some of the "hard to abate" sectors of industry, today being powered by fossil fuels, feel free to table that in as a separate and different debate, when it comes to electrification.
But rest assured, [I][b]China being the world's 1st electrostate[/b][/I] and their $180 bn electrotech (exports in 2024 and projected nearly $200 bn in 2025), has everything to do with their world electrification prowess, and the move towards reducing theirs and the world's carbon foot print, through electrification technologies. But when you are the world's greatest manufacturing power, at close to 30% (and projected to be 45% in 2030, where the US is only 11%) then you're going to use a fair amount of nations most abundant fossil fuel resource, while your electrification transition ramps up.
Now, since you missed the irony of the "electrostate vs. Petrostate" export of technologies comparison and their related [B]cumulative[/B] CO2/ GHG emissions, it is should be obvious, that while both China and the United States, are adding their CO2/ GHG emissions "balance sheet" (or ledger), China is producing and exporting more clean tech ($180 bn), that annually abate billions of tons CO2 emission around the world, should in a practical and pragmatic world, would be weighed against total emissions, on balance.
-
A big Alberta provincial MAGA T-shirt instead?
[QUOTE=Canada;3059711]I am from Alberta and it would be great if Alberta was part of USA. USA should trade Colorado, CA, Oregon and Washington for Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Yukon. USA could throw in Minnesota too. Canada is ripping off Alberta royally.[/QUOTE]Nah, no need for all that! Just show up at the border, looking all helpless in a MAGA T-shirt and I'm sure ICE (the MAGA Nazi Brownshirts) will welcome you with open arms. [I]Problem solved, for being a part of the U.S.![/I]
-
$2.00 gas in Wyoming and Oklahoma
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059866]And you were doing so well with that one post containing a link.
Please tell us where "gas was $2 a gallon six weeks ago" in the USA. And please be specific with a link, a chart, anything.
Please cite when and where in the USA Trump made "huge economic gains" from the "train wreck" Biden-Harris handed him. Did you mean for Trump himself, his family and a few billionaires? Because that fact is undeniable and is charted on a monthly basis in the media. However, it certainly hasn't been in jobs creation, business bankruptcies reduction, wage gains, GDP Growth, a lower rate of inflation or lowering the prices for most other items including gas and groceries.
The average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA is higher now under Trump than all but about 3-4 months in 2022 under Biden. And the reason for it in 2022 had nothing to do with Biden while the reason for it today has everything to do with Trump.
The rate of inflation was 2.9% at the Biden-Harris handoff to Trump. In 2025 it was 3.0%. You know which one is higher, right?
So where were these "huge economic gains" in the USA under Trump vs the Envy of the World Economy he inherited from Biden-Harris? And, again, please be specific with a link, a chart, anything.[/QUOTE]6 weeks ago gas was $2.00 to $2.20 a gallon in Wyoming, Oklahoma and Arizona. I filled up in Arizona at $2.20. Oklahoma had some stations at $1.99. It was on the national news as cheapest gas in USA. CA was averaging $4.89 at the same period so double. CA is usually $2. 00 above USA average. Canada was about $4.00 a gallon.
-
How to channel your inner MDS1, by posting non-verbal constipated single-link IBS
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3059740]It destroys anything it comes into contact with.
[url]https://www.latimes.com/sports/story/2026-04-01/umpire-cb-bucknor-leaves-game-with-injury-day-after-abs-replay-humbled-him[/url][/QUOTE][URL]https://www.teepublic.com/t-shirt/72226084-everything-trump-touches-turns-to-shit-anti-trump-[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060005]"Potayto, potahto, tomato, tomahto". Once again, your failure to understand basic meaning of [B][i]"cumulative",[/i][/B] I first posted, in the link clearly entitled: [B]Our World in Data: Cumulative CO2 emissions:[/B] [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions[/URL], is indeed astounding.
Allow me to add the following [I](Courtesy of Google Search)[/I] in case you still, like to use conjecture and phrases like "potayto, potahto":
Yes, it is accurate that while China is currently the world's largest annual emitter of, [B]the United States and Europe hold the highest cumulative emissions in history[/B]. Because remains in the atmosphere for centuries, historical emissions are a major contributor to current global warming. [B]Who has contributed most to global CO2 emissions?[/B] Oct 2019 [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/contributed-most-global-co2[/URL] OR [B]Which countries have contributed the most to historical CO2 emissions?[/B] Mar 17th, 2025 [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/which-countries-have-contributed-the-most-to-historical-co-emissions[/URL].
Historical vs. Annual Emissions Key Points:
[LIST]Historical Top Emitter: The United States is the largest cumulative emitter, responsible for roughly one-quarter (approx. 20-25%) of all historical emissions since 1750.
[url]https://ourworldindata.org/contributed-most-global-co2[/url][/LIST][LIST]Europe's Role: European countries, particularly the UK and Germany, were the dominant emitters between 1750 and 1850, leading to a high total accumulation.[/LIST][LIST]China's Rise: While China only recently became a major emitter, its rapid industrialization has caused it to overtake the EU27 in historical cumulative emissions to become the second-largest contributor.[/LIST][LIST]The Gap: Despite China's rapid rise, the U.S. cumulative total is still significantly higher roughly twice as much as China's.[/LIST][LIST]Per Capita Difference: [b]On a per capita basis, U.S. cumulative emissions are far higher than China's,[/b] as China's emissions are spread over a much larger population.[/LIST]In short, [B]the U.S.[/B] and [B]Europe[/B] bear the primary responsibility for the current stock of in the atmosphere, while China is the largest contributor to the current annual flow of emissions.
Note: The above passage, was Courtesy of Google Search (with links in [U]English[/U] to the related subject).[/QUOTE]No, I absolutely get it. Your tribe wants to blame the genocide of Indians and the enslavement of blacks on the American white men alive today. Same principle.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060005]Sorry, I've only been able to read French, at high school grade level. But if you're just throwing out links, just because ChatGOP told you so, and your lazy ass, didn't want verify whatever garage it tells you, then that's on you![/QUOTE]You and Tooms demand to be spoon fed everything. And then if the info doesn't come from one your favored LWM (leftist WINGER media) sources you discount it.
I didn't get those numbers from ChatGPT. ChatGPT, presumably providing a guess for 2026, estimated fossil fuels would account for 81% of Chinese energy. You asked for a source. So I asked ChatGPT to provide a link to a source and it came back with the Wikipedia entry, which most likely is available in the French but not English edition. If you're using Chrome or Edge, right click on the web page and "translate to English. " Then scroll down and you'll find 2023 numbers. They should be easy to spot, as from memory fossil fuels accounted for 87.1% of Chinese energy and nuclear 2. 8%. You'll need to add solar, wind, hydro, etc. to come up with the renewables %.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060005]Note that "energy" or primary energy, is not even close to being the same [I][b]final energy,[/b][/I] OR [I][b]useful energy.[/b][/I] Nor does it have anything to do with China being an electrostate or producing electrotech, other than fossil fuels (prime energy) molecules being 3 x less efficient at generating electricity, than electrons.
So while your post goes off into the weeds, talking about, some of the "hard to abate" sectors of industry, today being powered by fossil fuels, feel free to table that in as a separate and different debate, when it comes to electrification.[/QUOTE]Yeah, well try and find a good source for a "useful energy" breakdown by source for China. Or take primary energy and try to calculate it. If you do it right, I bet you'll still come up with the vast majority of useful energy in China being produced from fossil fuels.
And I'll ***** right back of you. The massive capacity increases, in GW, reported for China for solar and wind don't take into account that the energy produced from that capacity, in GW-HR, will be much lower because the sun don't shine bright and the wind don't blow all the time. (Grammatical errors added for emphasis.).
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060005]But rest assured, [I][b]China being the world's 1st electrostate[/b][/I] and their $180 bn electrotech (exports in 2024 and projected nearly $200 bn in 2025), has everything to do with their world electrification prowess, and the move towards reducing theirs and the world's carbon foot print, through electrification technologies. But when you are the world's greatest manufacturing power, at close to 30% (and projected to be 45% in 2030, where the US is only 11%) then you're going to use a fair amount of nations most abundant fossil fuel resource, while your electrification transition ramps up.
Now, since you missed the irony of the "electrostate vs. Petrostate" export of technologies comparison and their related [B]cumulative[/B] CO2/ GHG emissions, it is should be obvious, that while both China and the United States, are adding their CO2/ GHG emissions "balance sheet" (or ledger), China is producing and exporting more clean tech ($180 bn), that annually abate billions of tons CO2 emission around the world, should in a practical and pragmatic world, would be weighed against total emissions, on balance.[/QUOTE]China not only is adding much more renewable capacity than any other country, it's also adding a lot more coal capacity and nuclear capacity than anyplace else, and running neck and neck with the USA (which is the Saudi Arabia of natural gas) in adding gas fired capacity. China has a very logical energy policy -- throw everything but the kitchen sink at the problem, have a diversified energy supply, and don't be dependent on any one source or country. Thus when Qatari natural gas gets cut off China doesn't suffer, like some Asian and European countries will. Excluding some blue states, the USA operates similarly. We have a diversified supply, and like China are adding solar capacity in much larger amounts than capacity from fossil fuels or nuclear. That's because solar is cheaper than coal or nuclear and competitive with natural gas. China has dirty air from coal and does not have large domestic natural gas reserves, so solar makes all the more sense. The drawback at present though is that solar is not a solution for reliable base load power.
Contrast with countries like Germany, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Spain, and the Peoples' Republic of California that rely heavily on solar and wind energy without adequate backup. When they foolishly cut off their supplies of Russian pipeline gas, the European countries suffered through energy crises.
I think it's great that China is a low cost producer of solar panels and the like and exports that to the world. I think tariffs on Chinese imports related to renewable energy should be "0", as long as that wouldn't represent a threat to the USA's national security. And as long as we have backup generation from natural gas, coal, etc. available, it won't be.
Similarly I believe it's great that the USA exports LNG to the world. The LNG mostly substitutes for coal. Natural gas (LNG) emits much lower quantities of SO2, NOx, particulates and harmful metals than coal, and lower quantities of CO2. You on the other hand, like many climate advocates, probably don't like that, because you believe that good is the enemy of perfect. Well, a perfect world, with "0" net carbon emissions achieved in short order, will do a lot more harm than good.
-
Still no link, but OK.
[QUOTE=Canada;3060028]6 weeks ago gas was $2.00 to $2.20 a gallon in Wyoming, Oklahoma and Arizona. I filled up in Arizona at $2.20. Oklahoma had some stations at $1.99. It was on the national news as cheapest gas in USA. CA was averaging $4.89 at the same period so double. CA is usually $2. 00 above USA average. Canada was about $4.00 a gallon.[/QUOTE]So for a day or two some podunk gas station in the middle of podunk nowhere decided to take a loss and sell gas for an amount low enough to get free advertisement on international news somewhere and that was the "huge economic gain" Trump somehow brought to the table?
Uh. Ok.
I hear somebody gave away a couple of free cookies with the purchase of a dozen eggs during the Avian Flu epidemic in 2022. And you didn't do a cartwheel and congratulate Biden for that?
-
A Case of Broke, Brooke-back Alberta, Canada?
[QUOTE=Canada;3059562] California is broke and the laughing stock of USA. Newsome has destroyed California. Stop posting misinformation.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Canada;3059710] Here is California bad news. Budget deficit $18 billion going to $$35 billion in 2027. High employment 5.3% and rich people leaving the state in droves. Look at the link. Don't be lazy. Just google it and 20 + news posts on California debt and financial problems. Big economy but Newsome policies driving it to ruins. Rich people leaving and illegals arriving to their sanctuary cities. This is common knowledge everywhere but on fake news.
[url]https://calmatters.org/politics/2025/12/california-budget-primer/[/url][/QUOTE]So while, my esteem colleague EihTooms, was very generous giving you credit for posting a link with you post, [I]"...rather than laying back in your barcalounger with a Tim Horton donut utter nonsense pro Trump fantasies",[/I] I think your post was being a bit disingenuous and failed to mention those budget numbers were [U]only projected numbers.[/U] Take a look the most recent projected numbers, posted well before your post.
[B]Governor Proposes Balanced Budget, No New Taxes[/B] January 16th, 2026. [I]"The budget plan released on January 9 estimates more than $42 billion in added General Fund revenue compared to what was expected last June. As a result, [b]the projected budget deficit has dropped to $2.9 billion[/b] instead of the $18 billion anticipated last year."[/I] [URL]https://calchamberalert.com/2026/01/16/governor-proposes-balanced-budget-no-new-taxes/[/URL].
[B]Alberta in Contrast:[/B] I thought this was supposed to be Canada's oil-rich province? [B]Canada's Alberta projects deficit of nearly C$9.4bn, citing low oil prices,[/B] February 27th, 2026 [URL]https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yvppyv442o?[/URL] [NOPARSE]WTF, that's roughly US$7.55 bn (C$9.4 bn) and slightly more than 2x as much as California, for a province that has population, 10x [/NOPARSE]smaller.
From what I've gathered, it sounds like one of those dumb and unqualified women (Danielle Smith, right-wing conservative party), you referred to in a previous post, running an inept provincial gov't and has the so called "oil-rich" province in debt to the tune of US $7.55 bn (C $9.4 bn).
What do yo make of this right-wing conservative US $7.55 bn (C $9. 4 bn) incompetence?
-
Electrostate vs Petrostate: What does China's $180 bn in electrotech sales say?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059396]That's right, China's a carbon state, not an electrostate. [/QUOTE]BTW, did ChatGOP, puppet you [I]...I mean "educate" you,[/I] into thinking China wasn't an electrostate? Or did you come to that dumbfounded falsehood on your own?
[B]Why China is becoming the worlds first electrostate[/B], Aug 12,2025. [URL]https://newsapp.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-13/china-turns-into-electrostate-after-staggering-renewable-growth/105555850[/URL] "The superpower is dominating the global clean technology sector. It's not all about climate change. ".
[B]China Is The Worlds First Electrostate,[/B] Mar 26,2025. [URL]https://cleantechnica.com/2025/05/26/china-is-the-worlds-first-electrostate/[/URL] [I]"An "electrostate" refers to a country that primarily relies on electricity generated from renewable sources rather than fossil fuels. [/I]..[/QUOTE]So while ChatGOP is educating you to "cut-and-paste" large swaths of its Chat info (you cannot put into own frame of thought), then perhaps you can ask it, if China isn't an electrostate, then who is?
At this point, I'm not sure what's worse:
[LIST]MAGA posts with large swaths of "cut-n-paste" news articles, with blank spaces and the word [b]"ADVERTISTMENT"[/b] still left in the post, because the poster is too lazy to take them out or to paraphrase in their own words;[/LIST][LIST]MAGA posts with a single webpage link, with no explanation, often too lazy put into words their own words on the subject matter;[/LIST]OR[LIST]MAGA posts with large swaths of [b]"cut-n-paste" ChatGOP information,[/b] with no associated links (or links to French webpages) because the poster is again too lazy to put the aggregated information, in their own words and thoughts.[/LIST]So, what say you, Tiny 12 [I]...err, I mean ChatGOP?[/I] Please do [B]"educate" us,[/B]as too what is an electrostate and what makes an electrostate, if China is not?
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060040]You and Tooms demand to be spoon fed everything. And then if the info doesn't come from one your favored LWM (leftist WINGER media) sources you discount it.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Canada;3060028]6 weeks ago gas was $2.00 to $2.20 a gallon in Wyoming, Oklahoma and Arizona. I filled up in Arizona at $2.20. Oklahoma had some stations at $1.99. It was on the national news as cheapest gas in USA. CA was averaging $4.89 at the same period so double. CA is usually $2. 00 above USA average. Canada was about $4.00 a gallon.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060108]Still no link, but OK. [/QUOTE]You just don't get how things work around here Canada. What you need to do is find a link to the Guardian or the New York Times or ProPublica that says the price of gasoline was $2.20 in Arizona and $1.99 in Oklahoma. Until you do that nobody around here is going to take you seriously.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060163]BTW, did ChatGOP, puppet you [I]...I mean "educate" you,[/I] into thinking China wasn't an electrostate? Or did you come to that dumbfounded falsehood on your own?
[B]Why China is becoming the worlds first electrostate[/B], Aug 12,2025. [URL]https://newsapp.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-13/china-turns-into-electrostate-after-staggering-renewable-growth/105555850[/URL] "The superpower is dominating the global clean technology sector. It's not all about climate change. ".
[B]China Is The Worlds First Electrostate,[/B] Mar 26,2025. [URL]https://cleantechnica.com/2025/05/26/china-is-the-worlds-first-electrostate/[/URL] [I]"An "electrostate" refers to a country that primarily relies on electricity generated from renewable sources rather than fossil fuels. [/I]..So while ChatGOP is educating you to "cut-and-paste" large swaths of its Chat info (you cannot put into own frame of thought), then perhaps you can ask it, if China isn't an electrostate, then who is?
At this point, I'm not sure what's worse:
[LIST]MAGA posts with large swaths of "cut-n-paste" news articles, with blank spaces and the word [b]"ADVERTISTMENT"[/b] still left in the post, because the poster is too lazy to take them out or to paraphrase in their own words;[/LIST][LIST]MAGA posts with a single webpage link, with no explanation, often too lazy put into words their own words on the subject matter;[/LIST]OR[LIST]MAGA posts with large swaths of [b]"cut-n-paste" ChatGOP information,[/b] with no associated links (or links to French webpages) because the poster is again too lazy to put the aggregated information, in their own words and thoughts.[/LIST]So, what say you, Tiny 12 [I]...err, I mean ChatGOP?[/I] Please do [B]"educate" us,[/B]as too what is an electrostate and what makes an electrostate, if China is not?[/QUOTE]I haven't cut and pasted anything from ChatGPT Spidy. I just write and know fossil fuels a lot better than you do. And I'm more accurate on this subject than many of the sources you quote.
OK, if it will make you happy, China is an electrostate that emits 33% of the world's CO2 and relies on fossil fuels for over 80% of its [B]primary[/B] energy.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060160]So while, my esteem colleague EihTooms, was very generous giving you credit for posting a link with you post, [I]"...rather than laying back in your barcalounger with a Tim Horton donut utter nonsense pro Trump fantasies",[/I] I think your post was being a bit disingenuous and failed to mention those budget numbers were [U]only projected numbers.[/U] Take a look the most recent projected numbers, posted well before your post.
[B]Governor Proposes Balanced Budget, No New Taxes[/B] January 16th, 2026. [I]"The budget plan released on January 9 estimates more than $42 billion in added General Fund revenue compared to what was expected last June. As a result, [b]the projected budget deficit has dropped to $2.9 billion[/b] instead of the $18 billion anticipated last year."[/I] [URL]https://calchamberalert.com/2026/01/16/governor-proposes-balanced-budget-no-new-taxes/[/URL].
[B]Alberta in Contrast:[/B] I thought this was supposed to be Canada's oil-rich province? [B]Canada's Alberta projects deficit of nearly C$9.4bn, citing low oil prices,[/B] February 27th, 2026 [URL]https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yvppyv442o?[/URL] [NOPARSE]WTF, that's roughly US$7.55 bn (C$9.4 bn) and slightly more than 2x as much as California, for a province that has population, 10x [/NOPARSE]smaller.
From what I've gathered, it sounds like one of those dumb and unqualified women (Danielle Smith, right-wing conservative party), you referred to in a previous post, running an inept provincial gov't and has the so called "oil-rich" province in debt to the tune of US $7.55 bn (C $9.4 bn).
What do yo make of this right-wing conservative US $7.55 bn (C $9. 4 bn) incompetence?[/QUOTE]Alberta ran surpluses in four of its last five fiscal years. If you don't believe that, look it up instead of asking me to jump through hoops like a trained seal.
Yeah, when oil prices are low, the province will run deficits. The 9.4 billion CAD deficit estimate for the 2026/2027 fiscal year was made before the Iran war. If current strip prices for oil are indicative of what comes to pass, Alberta will have a surplus in 2026/2027, not a deficit. So you actually came up with an example of "right-wing conservative" competence?
-
Really no MAGA for USA. Attacking Iran to support criminal Netanyahou, was just a mistake and big failure with deaths, injured and so many billions spent for 0 result other than putting economics in messe and now inflation to pay. When really not deserving Nobel peace award, Trump can compete for less clever ever president of USA. Would be incredible if he is confirmed on November.
-
How the mighty have fallen
This will be remembered in the annals of history as a watershed moment: when America began its downfall from its unimpeached dominance. Humbled and humiliated by a basketcase of a nation like Iran. What hope does America have against China? None. The Chinese cannot believe their luck. The Americans have wasted vast amounts of money, ammunition (which will take years to build up) and most of all political and global goodwill. The writing is on the wall for Taiwan.
Not only has America lost a great deal from this farce, but so has most of the world. The only ones who've gained are Israel and Russia and possibly China.
The MAGA fuckwits who still endorse Trump are beneath contempt and beyond comprehension.
-
2 photos
Fact!
Melonia Trump ate a live baby on Times Square last night.
No link necessary. It happened. I just know more about Repub cannibalism than anyone here. Look it up for yourself and stop expecting everyone else to do the hard work for you.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060253]Melonia Trump ate a live baby on Times Square last night.
No link necessary. It happened. I just know more about Repub cannibalism than anyone here. Look it up for yourself and stop expecting everyone else to do the hard work for you.[/QUOTE]Good for "Melonia"! Why should Democrats have all the fun?
[URL]https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueUnpopularOpinion/comments/1r9p3et/pizzagate_was_real_and_people_misremember_what_it/[/URL]
Adrenochrome kicks ass!
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060040]No, I absolutely get it. Your tribe wants to blame the genocide of Indians and the enslavement of blacks on the American white men alive today. Same principle.
You and Tooms demand to be spoon fed everything. And then if the info doesn't come from one your favored LWM (leftist WINGER media) sources you discount it.[/QUOTE]Yeah, when Tooms and Spidy are dead wrong about something, they try to change the subject or question the source. With Spidy, this sentence was the death knell of his idiotic electrostate comment.
"A grid composed solely of solar, wind, and batteries is preposterous on its face the volume of batteries required to provide baseload power for days or weeks at a time borders on the absurd. This is why no such system has ever been piloted at a reasonable scale: the moment it is, the flaws would become immediately and fatally obvious. ".
He had no counter and had to babble on about the history of power generation and accused me of not crediting my source and wring it as my own. IOW, he did everything but deal with the facts within the statement as it totally took the air out of his absurd "electrostate".
So he goes back to his link defense not realizbing there is something called a paywall and I cannot link the site to one in which he could read. Thing is the information I am getting from paid sources on Substack is so much better than in the MSM it is cringe worthy. In this case, the article I quoted was written by Doomberg, which has evolved into the #1 rated source on Substack for financial news. The background of the founders of Domberg are clearly in energy and they have ravaged the "carbon neutral" electricity farce better than I have read anywhere else. They even have a rare comments section where the tired red-blue debates that have overwhelmed everyone (even in places where I cannot stand it like the NFL) does not exist. It is a refreshing change where you do not add or subtract 10 points from someone's IQ based on whom they voted for. That is my definition for the dumb Dem.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060253]Melonia Trump ate a live baby on Times Square last night.
No link necessary. It happened. I just know more about Repub cannibalism than anyone here. Look it up for yourself and stop expecting everyone else to do the hard work for you.[/QUOTE]Former ABC News Reporter Who "Debunked" Pizzagate Guilty of Possessing Child prn.
[URL]https://www.lipstickalley.com/threads/former-abc-news-reporter-who-%E2%80%9Cdebunked%E2%80%9D-pizzagate-guilty-of-possessing-child-p%CE%B4rn.5337154/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.reddit.com/r/Maher/comments/1qxoiwz/bill_maher_admits_he_may_owe_qanon_an_apology/[/URL]
Bill Maher Admits he May Owe QAnon an 'Apology' Over Epstein: 'It's a Little More Than Smoke'.
You see? There are links and everything.
-
MAGA proves GOD is great
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3060251]This will be remembered in the annals of history as a watershed moment: when America began its downfall from its unimpeached dominance. Humbled and humiliated by a basketcase of a nation like Iran. What hope does America have against China? None. The Chinese cannot believe their luck. The Americans have wasted vast amounts of money, ammunition (which will take years to build up) and most of all political and global goodwill. The writing is on the wall for Taiwan.
Not only has America lost a great deal from this farce, but so has most of the world. The only ones who've gained are Israel and Russia and possibly China.
The MAGA fuckwits who still endorse Trump are beneath contempt and beyond comprehension.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQCU36pkH7c[/URL]
[URL]https://www.visiontimes.com/2026/01/01/factories-close-workers-sleep-on-the-streets-dongguans-vanishing-workforce-raises-hard-questions.html[/URL]
[URL]https://www.investing.com/analysis/asia-wrap--asias-factories-go-quiet-as-high-priced-energy-starves-the-system-200676971[/URL]
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/scottpowell/ccp-venezuela-iran/2026/04/02/id/1251621/[/URL]
[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBo45Jz0jXU[/URL]
-
What is really going on
Well, once again, the latest Trump is out of his fucking mind tactic once again worked beautifully. He got everyone talking about his unhinged message about blowing up Iran and putting them back into the stone age, drew a red line in the sand, and worked out a cease fire. Markets are soaring. Hormuz is open and everyone is singing kumbaya. So is everything all good?
Hardly.
I have been trying to get a handle on why Trump went in. At first, I thought it was simplistic. A military invasion worked in Venezuela. Why not in Iran? Trump has been engaging in Democrat level lawfare with regards to foreign leaders, and some of actions have been beyond annoying, so I was cynical. I thought Trump was just like, "So Iran's leadership is a pain in the ass? Let's just blow them up!
It was easy to take pot shots at Trump on this matter. Iran is not Venezuela. They have councils and a clear succession plan. Chavez and especially Maduro were meglomanicas who put themselves above their country and had no succession plan in place so taking out an egotistical dolt like Maduro and putting in his #2 as a puppet was easy.
Then of course, you had the drones and missiles of Iran that have been cauing havoc in the Middle East. Some of these missiles have been shot at targets close to a 1000 miles away, and they have caused hundreds of billions in damages. Hell, Iran has even been able to shoot down American planes. The American militray was caught flat footed and woefully underestimated their enemy and have not learned the lessons of Ukraine and been busy preparing to fight the past wars and not the current ones.
So like anyone who peruses the MSM, I did not get this war. Worse, you have this notion being sold that we are losing. This is such a stupid concept, the concept of winning the war. Iran has been decimated. They have lost and so have we and so have the neighboring Arab states. There are no fucking winners here. It is war not a fucking football game. So why did we even bother doing it? Is there any reason outside of Trump being crazy? Well, yeah, there is, and it is not to be found in the MSM.
Quite frankly, Israel has been crying wolf about Iran having the bomb for so long that it has been easy to tune them out and given out recent raid on Iran and supposedly destroying their nuclear capacity, it was hard to have to admit the bombing raid did not work. New intelligence showed Iran has much more nuclear capacity than was thought possible. From the substack link:
Here is what is known about the location of Iran's uranium ore that has been enriched to 60 degrees of purity, just short of the 90-plus degrees of purity needed to trigger a nuclear bomb.
Iran's main enrichment center, deep inside a mountain at Fordow, one of three main nuclear weapons sites in Iran, was struck last June by a US air attack authorized by Trump in cooperation with Israel. I now understand that every three kilograms of uranium, once enriched at Fordow, would be stored in a heavy container and quickly shipped to one of the vast underground tunnels—depicted to me as "octopus" tunnels—beneath a second major Iranian nuclear weapons facility at Isfahan. Iran's fleet of ballistic missiles and launchers were similarly stored, among other hidden sites, in the tunnels at Isfahan and at a third underground nuclear weapons facility at Natanz.
At this point, I learned, 390 kilograms of enriched uranium are known by Israeli intelligence to be stored at the underground nuclear facility in Isfahan, 25 to 30 kilograms at Natanz, and 15 kilograms at bombed-out Fordow. US and Israeli military teams have tracked locations and have been studying the question of how to fight their way into the tunnels and retrieve the enriched materials. The next step, so the thinking goes, would be to transport the canisters by helicopter to a covert US base in Azerbaijan.
All in all, I was told by someone with firsthand knowledge, there are at least 26 curving underground "octopus" tunnels throughout Iran used for the storage of ballistic missiles and launchers.
I was further told that Israeli intelligence estimated within the last two weeks that bomb and rocket attacks have destroyed 80 percent of Iran's missile launchers and 90 percent of Iran's ballistic missile arsenal. But the rockets keep coming, as does Iran's huge fleet of drones.
Israeli intelligence now believes, I was told, that the incessant US and Israeli bombing of known tunnel entrances may have shielded entrances to underground Iranian missile and rocket depots that may have other, unknown exits. That would explain the continuing flow of accurately targeted Iranian rockets and missiles launched at sites in Israel and at other states along the Persian Gulf allied to the US.
I've been told that tens of thousands of US troops are in place and poised to invade the Kharg Island export terminal in the northern Persian Gulf that is tightly controlled by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as well as other islands in the Strait of Hormuz controlled by Iran. The order has not yet been issued from the White House. End of link.
This puts the war in an entirely different light. Iran has the uranium to build a bomb, and their missile technology has gotten better. Obviously, Iran can hit Isreal with a nuke, and in a short time, they could hit the USA. Thing is unlike other nations like North Korea or Pakistan, the Isrealis believe the Iranian muslims are crazy enough to detonate a nuke, and they have Trump buying it as well.
If you recall, the Isrealis also hit a nuclear reactor in Iraq when that country was being controlled by Saddam Hussein, and he definitely was crazy enough to have blown up a nuke.
I do not buy that Kharg Island crap. If the USA is going to put troops on the ground, there is a mission and I think a doable mission which is to seize all that uranium. If Iran does not hand it over, I think we are back to square one and the war is on.
So at least there is a why to this war outside of Trump's impulsiveness. It was refreshing to know what he is still rational when everyone is calling him crazy but Iran having nuclear capacity and the missiles they do is downright scary.
-
Alberta votes
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060188]Alberta ran surpluses in four of its last five fiscal years. If you don't believe that, look it up instead of asking me to jump through hoops like a trained seal.
Yeah, when oil prices are low, the province will run deficits. The 9.4 billion CAD deficit estimate for the 2026/2027 fiscal year was made before the Iran war. If current strip prices for oil are indicative of what comes to pass, Alberta will have a surplus in 2026/2027, not a deficit. So you actually came up with an example of "right-wing conservative" competence?[/QUOTE]Alberta is voting October to 9 to separate from Canada. It will never pass but it shows the frustration by a conservative province getting screwed by a socialist government.
-
Gas $1.99
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060182]You just don't get how things work around here Canada. What you need to do is find a link to the Guardian or the New York Times or ProPublica that says the price of gasoline was $2.20 in Arizona and $1.99 in Oklahoma. Until you do that nobody around here is going to take you seriously.[/QUOTE]Here it is:
[URL]https://www.gasbuddy.com/go/nations-cheapest-stations-fall-to-1-99-gallon-ahead-of-thanksgiving-for-the-first-time-in-four-years[/URL]
-
Yes Newsome Proposed a balanced budget
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060160]So while, my esteem colleague EihTooms, was very generous giving you credit for posting a link with you post, [I]"...rather than laying back in your barcalounger with a Tim Horton donut utter nonsense pro Trump fantasies",[/I] I think your post was being a bit disingenuous and failed to mention those budget numbers were [U]only projected numbers.[/U] Take a look the most recent projected numbers, posted well before your post.
[B]Governor Proposes Balanced Budget, No New Taxes[/B] January 16th, 2026. [I]"The budget plan released on January 9 estimates more than $42 billion in added General Fund revenue compared to what was expected last June. As a result, [b]the projected budget deficit has dropped to $2.9 billion[/b] instead of the $18 billion anticipated last year."[/I] [URL]https://calchamberalert.com/2026/01/16/governor-proposes-balanced-budget-no-new-taxes/[/URL].[/QUOTE]Yes Newsome proposed a balanced budget just like he proposed the following.
Proposed High speed rail. Billions spent and no high speed rail.
Proposed fixing the homeless problem. Billions spent and more homeless year after year.
Proposed new gas tax to fix the roads and highways. Billions collected in gas tax and CA roads worst in the nation.
Proposed a balanced budget in 2025 and huge deficit.
Newsome proposal tax the millionaire to collect more taxes. Millionaires leaving state for Texas and Florida so collecting less taxes.
Newsome proposal to have sanctuary cities. More criminals moving to CA to avoid arrest in law abiding states.
Newsome will be long gone after the 2026 deficit.
You must be so proud to cheer for these Newsome proposals.
-
Get a clue
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3060251]This will be remembered in the annals of history as a watershed moment: when America began its downfall from its unimpeached dominance. Humbled and humiliated by a basketcase of a nation like Iran. What hope does America have against China? None. The Chinese cannot believe their luck. The Americans have wasted vast amounts of money, ammunition (which will take years to build up) and most of all political and global goodwill. The writing is on the wall for Taiwan.
Not only has America lost a great deal from this farce, but so has most of the world. The only ones who've gained are Israel and Russia and possibly China.
The MAGA fuckwits who still endorse Trump are beneath contempt and beyond comprehension.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/why-china-might-have-pressed-iran-compromise-us[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3060251]This will be remembered in the annals of history as a watershed moment: when America began its downfall from its unimpeached dominance. Humbled and humiliated by a basketcase of a nation like Iran. What hope does America have against China? None. The Chinese cannot believe their luck. The Americans have wasted vast amounts of money, ammunition (which will take years to build up) and most of all political and global goodwill. The writing is on the wall for Taiwan.
Not only has America lost a great deal from this farce, but so has most of the world. The only ones who've gained are Israel and Russia and possibly China.
The MAGA fuckwits who still endorse Trump are beneath contempt and beyond comprehension.[/QUOTE]You left out North Korea a country that has nuclear weapons and has threatened the US.
-
Did they catch Trump in the Epstein Files yet? Haven't had time to follow the news a lot lately?
-
3 photos
Thanks
[QUOTE=Canada;3060335]Here it is:
[URL]https://www.gasbuddy.com/go/nations-cheapest-stations-fall-to-1-99-gallon-ahead-of-thanksgiving-for-the-first-time-in-four-years[/URL][/QUOTE][QUOTE]Four stations, located in Midwest City, Oklahoma (Oklahoma City metropolitan area), stood at $1.99 per gallon for regular unleaded gasoline early Monday morning, November 24.[/QUOTE]Even without reading that link a day ago I nailed the "middle of podunk nowhere" aspect of your claim.
See, this is why providing links is helpful. The next major step that I see neither Tiny nor Elvis and we all know MDS have mastered is to actually quote a sentence or two from your links, on the rare occasion you might provide one, that could conceivably support your grandly announced contention.
Well, in the case of MDS he not only doesn't provide such a sentence or two from the various bizarre "news" source links he provides but a painful scan of whatever link he has provided usually reveals it has little or nothing to do with his grand claim, nothing to do with the quote he is supposedly responding to and quite often utterly refutes the grand claim he made.
So in their case it is understandable why they rarely quote the supposedly pertinent sentence or two from their links.
-
Electrostate v Petetrostate: USA is still #1 CO2 emitter, but what of CO2-free goals?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060185]I haven't cut and pasted anything from ChatGPT Spidy. I just write and know fossil fuels a lot better than you do. And I'm more accurate on this subject than many of the sources you quote.
OK, if it will make you happy, China is an electrostate that emits 33% of the world's CO2 and relies on fossil fuels for over 80% of its [B]primary[/B] energy.[/QUOTE]LOL! That's funny "you know fossil fuels", since you didn't seem to know [I]the U.S. was still, the world's largest/biggest cumulative CO2 emitter in history,[/I] with China as a distant second, just overtaking Europe. For example see: [URL]https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-chinas-emissions-have-now-caused-more-global-warming-than-eu/[/URL] OR [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/data-insights/which-countries-have-contributed-the-most-to-historical-co-emissions[/URL].
You're just like your MAGA Fuhrer, claiming victory, when there is [B]none![/B]. Just take the latest bullshit bungling and incompetence in Strait of Hormuz, where according to many political pundits, has left Iran, stronger and in more control of the region. But on the other hand, has left the world looking at renewables, clean tech and EV, more favorably. So thanks MAGA Fuhrer!
That said, I look forward to your so called "reverence" on fossil fuels, have at it.
Naturally, I'll continue to focus and discuss my topics choice: [B]Low Carbon to Clean Energy & Tech, Renewables[/B] and [B] Decarbonization[/B] of the residential, commercial and industrial world, by any and all countries, companies and entities, helping move toward a cleaner, greener energy transition and non-fossil fuel choice, where possible.
So while [I]the U.S.[/I] has emitted around 400 billion tonnes of accumulated CO2, the most in history, making it responsible for 25% of historical emissions, in comparison, China is the second-largest contributor with about half that amount. [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/contributed-most-global-co2[/URL]
And while many in [I]the U.S.[/I] would like to deny their CO2 emissions history, China has acknowledged they are today's largest CO2 polluter, accounting for approximately one-third of annual global emissions, China is on track and has committed to their long-term carbon-free goals, in 2030 (peak) and 2060 (net-zero).
China's transition speed, to meet their carbon free goals, is so impressive, they're on track to achieve said goals, earlier than expected. [I]The U.S. not so much![/I]
-
Is Alberta, just a one trick Pony?
[QUOTE=Canada;3060334] Alberta is voting October to 9 to separate from Canada. It will never pass but it shows the frustration by a conservative province getting screwed by a socialist government.[/QUOTE]Nothing like blaming years of incompetence, on the Feds, right! Correct me if I'm wrong, but at one time, didn't Alberta have some sort of sovereign fund equal to that of Norway?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060188]Alberta ran surpluses in four of its last five fiscal years. If you don't believe that, look it up instead of asking me to jump through hoops like a trained seal.
Yeah, when oil prices are low, the province will run deficits. The 9.4 billion CAD deficit estimate for the 2026/2027 fiscal year was made before the Iran war. If current strip prices for oil are indicative of what comes to pass, Alberta will have a surplus in 2026/2027, not a deficit. So you actually came up with an example of "right-wing conservative" competence?[/QUOTE]Alberta sounds like a one trick pony?
And BTW, as China and Asia become more and more clean energy and renewable led dominant economies and less reliant on oil and gas, I wonder if Alberta (this one trick pony), which remains one of the highest cost oil and gas producers in the world, will compete be able to [I]with cheap U.S., Russia, UAE and/or Saudi oil and gas?[/I].
-
How else does China benefit?
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3060251]This will be remembered in the annals of history as a watershed moment: when America began its downfall from its unimpeached dominance. Humbled and humiliated by a basketcase of a nation like Iran.
What hope does America have against China? None. The Chinese cannot believe their luck. The Americans have wasted vast amounts of money, ammunition (which will take years to build up) and most of all political and global goodwill. The writing is on the wall for Taiwan.
Not only has America lost a great deal from this farce, but so has most of the world. The only ones who've gained are Israel and Russia and possibly China.
The MAGA fuckwits who still endorse Trump are beneath contempt and beyond comprehension.[/QUOTE]Yes indeed, and quite right on all accounts!
BTW, what other ways, do you see China benefiting from this massive MAGA Fuhrer / Iran war cluster-fuck, other than Taiwan, in which I think China will adopt a more prolonged and patient, sort of passive aggressive approach to winning over Taiwan.
-
So True!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060357]Even without reading that link a day ago I nailed the "middle of podunk nowhere" aspect of your claim.
See, this is why providing links is helpful. The next major step that I see neither Tiny nor Elvis and we all know MDS have mastered is to actually quote a sentence or two from your links, on the rare occasion you might provide one, that could conceivably support your grandly announced contention.
Well, in the case of MDS he not only doesn't provide such a sentence or two from the various bizarre "news" source links he provides but a painful scan of whatever link he has provided usually reveals it has little or nothing to do with his grand claim, nothing to do with the quote he is supposedly responding to and quite often utterly refutes the grand claim he made..[/QUOTE]So very, very, very true!
But when the suckers who voted for the MAGA Fuhrer president, see reports of his senile and incapacity to read and understand intelligence reports and would rather watch videos of Iranian stuff being blown up (like a video game), as some sign of "winning", while Iranian depleted forces fight a masterful asymmetric war (like Ukraine) is it any wonder, why the war is a shit-show of incompetence.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060320]"A grid composed solely of solar, wind, and batteries is preposterous on its face the volume of batteries required to provide baseload power for days or weeks at a time borders on the absurd. This is why no such system has ever been piloted at a reasonable scale: the moment it is, the flaws would become immediately and fatally obvious. ".[/QUOTE]Absolutely true. Spidy has used South Australia as a role model. Well, conditions for solar and wind there are among the best in the world. But for baseload power, South Australia still must rely on natural gas from the Cooper Basin and interconnects from Victoria. And Victoria generates electricity mostly from dirty, dirty coal.
[QUOTE=Canada;3060335]Here it is:
[URL]https://www.gasbuddy.com/go/nations-cheapest-stations-fall-to-1-99-gallon-ahead-of-thanksgiving-for-the-first-time-in-four-years[/URL][/QUOTE]Granted, your link [URL]gasbuddy.com[/URL] says stations in Oklahoma were selling gasoline for $1. 99 a gallon in November, 2025. But [URL]gasbuddy.com[/URL] is not the New York Times, ProPublica or the Guardian. It is not from a LWM (left WINGER media) source and cannot be trusted. Please do more research, using approved media only.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060359]
You're just like your MAGA Fuhrer, claiming victory, when there is [B]none![/B]. Just take the latest bullshit bungling and incompetence in Strait of Hormuz, where according to many political pundits, has left Iran, stronger and in more control of the region. But on the other hand, has left the world looking at renewables, clean tech and EV, more favorably. So thanks MAGA Fuhrer![/QUOTE]I didn't like Trump, so much so that the Marquesa clearly viewed me as a greater threat than you to all that he holds dear.
I'm trying to do something about that though. I've been in a 12 step program, like Alcoholics Anonymous, to conquer my TDS. The first step was to acknowledge that, "My name is Tiny, and I have TDS. " I'm not out of the woods yet. But I do now hate Elizabeth Warren and the Squad more than Trump.
And why are you bitching about Donald's Big Iranian Adventure anyway? The problems with the strait of Hormuz will encourage improvements and development of battery storage for wind and solar energy, along with other alternatives to Middle East production.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060359]
So while [I]the U.S.[/I] has emitted around 400 billion tonnes of accumulated CO2, the most in history, making it responsible for 25% of historical emissions, in comparison, China is the second-largest contributor with about half that amount. [URL]https://ourworldindata.org/contributed-most-global-co2[/URL]
And while many in [I]the U.S.[/I] would like to deny their CO2 emissions history, China has acknowledged they are today's largest CO2 polluter, accounting for approximately one-third of annual global emissions, China is on track and has committed to their long-term carbon-free goals, in 2030 (peak) and 2060 (net-zero).
China's transition speed, to meet their carbon free goals, is so impressive, they're on track to achieve said goals, earlier than expected. [I]The U.S. not so much![/I][/QUOTE]What can I say that I haven't already said.
[URL]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-country[/URL]
Climate is your religion. I'm not going to change your mind, any more than I could change the minds of those members of the Iranian National Guard who are itching to die as martyrs. And who have no problem if they take down the rest of the Iranian people with them.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060361]Alberta sounds like a one trick pony?
And BTW, as China and Asia become more and more clean energy and renewable led dominant economies and less reliant on oil and gas, I wonder if Alberta (this one trick pony), which remains one of the highest cost oil and gas producers in the world, will compete be able to [I]with cheap U.S., Russia, UAE and/or Saudi oil and gas?[/I].[/QUOTE]Alberta conventional oil and gas production is probably lower cost overall than the USA's. With additional infrastructure, Alberta's unconventional resources (shales and tight sands) would be competitive with the USA. Some already are. I'm sure that there are Canadian Montney shale wells that outperform most new shale gas wells in the USA. New oil sands projects are indeed higher cost, but existing projects and brownfield expansions are competitive.
Yes, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are much lower cost, and Russia is lower cost.
But thank goodness red state America and Alberta have exploited their hydrocarbon resources! They keep us out of a world of hurt, versus relying on places like the Middle East, Venezuela and North Africa. Like California does.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060361]Nothing like blaming years of incompetence, on the Feds, right! Correct me if I'm wrong, but at one time, didn't Alberta have some sort of sovereign fund equal to that of Norway?[/QUOTE]
Why do you even attempt to argue Alberta politics with an Albertan? He's going to kick your ass, if he chooses to waste the time to do so.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060357]Even without reading that link a day ago I nailed the "middle of podunk nowhere" aspect of your claim.[/QUOTE]
Oklahoma City is podunk? Balderdash. Oklahoma City is well situated with respect to pipelines and refineries. The gasoline tax and regulation are not excessive.
California could have similar gasoline prices. At one time your home state had lots of oil production and refining capacity, and would still if not for the green energy zealots running the place.
-
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3060349]Did they catch Trump in the Epstein Files yet? Haven't had time to follow the news a lot lately?[/QUOTE]Trump is protected as president, when he appears a lot in Epstein criminal sexual business. His friend, criminal Netanyahou also avoid justice, not for same reason, with his war business.
-
61% Americans think now Trump is turning mad senile. So, must really get rid of him in November, when he is really too crazy dangerous, making messe and danger everywhere and we have to pay for his craziness, many even dying.
-
You cannot be serious
P Iran and putting them back into the stone age, drew a red line in the sand, and worked out a cease fire .
Riiiiight. He worked out a cease fire. No what happened is he got roped into a war by Israel, had no fucking clue what he was doing or what the outcome would be, and was desperate to get out by any means possible. The Pakistanis not he worked out the ceasefire (with a little help from the Chinese) and he seized it like a starving dog. Stop presenting this fuckwit as anything other than what he is: a fucking idiot.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060327]Well, once again, the latest Trump is out of his fucking mind tactic once again worked beautifully. He got everyone talking about his unhinged message about blowing up Iran and putting them back into the stone age, drew a red line in the sand, and worked out a cease fire. Markets are soaring. Hormuz is open and everyone is singing kumbaya. So is everything all good?
Hardly.
I have been trying to get a handle on why Trump went in. At first, I thought it was simplistic. A military invasion worked in Venezuela. Why not in Iran? Trump has been engaging in Democrat level lawfare with regards to foreign leaders, and some of actions have been beyond annoying, so I was cynical. I thought Trump was just like, "So Iran's leadership is a pain in the ass? Let's just blow them up![/QUOTE]
-
2 photos
Uh
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060381]Oklahoma City is podunk? Balderdash. Oklahoma City is well situated with respect to pipelines and refineries. The gasoline tax and regulation are not excessive.
California could have similar gasoline prices. At one time your home state had lots of oil production and refining capacity, and would still if not for the green energy zealots running the place.[/QUOTE]Four (4) gas stations in the entire country and they weren't even in an actual city but in some pudunk area several tumbleweed roads away from Oklahoma City.
Was that the "huge economic gains" Trump's policies brought to America while jacking up prices for most other things with his Liberation From Your Job Day Tariffs, the worst jobs creation record since the previous time he was a so-called president, the weakest wage increases in 5 years and his more business bankruptcies since GW Bush's Great Repub Recession?
You know, nobody needed to read the Guardian to discover those things happened but, amazing as it might seem to you, yep, the news of it made it into the columns of the Guardian, too.
BTW, this might be one connectable dot further than many pretend "Bothsider-Neithersiders" are used to noticing but a simple Google Search on these Real News items also produce sources like Reuters, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, etc but those sources are often blocked behind a pay / subscription wall and therefore are not useful as links on a message board. However, other sources like The Guardian report the exact same info but are not blocked behind a pay / subscription wall. That's why someone would post a link for that source instead of another one.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060357]Even without reading that link a day ago I nailed the "middle of podunk nowhere" aspect of your claim.
See, this is why providing links is helpful.[/QUOTE]Yeah, it is "helpful" to you in that when shown you are dead wrong about a subject, you criticize the link. Here is what you wrote:
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059866]Please tell us where "gas was $2 a gallon six weeks ago" in the USA. And please be specific with a link, a chart, anything.[/QUOTE]You asked for it and were given it and instead of acknowledging you were wrong, you changed the subject. That is why you have the credibility of Bagdad Bob.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060357]The next major step that I see neither Tiny nor Elvis and we all know MDS have mastered is to actually quote a sentence or two from your links, on the rare occasion you might provide one, that could conceivably support your grandly announced contention.[/QUOTE]And this is the classic dumb Dem: being arrogant as hell on a subject they were dead wrong about and then making personal attacks.
The arrogance really raised its head with the red-blue comment about how the blue states were carrying the red states. The Californian refugee like you is among the most despicable characters in American history. You leave California with your six figure pensions and toss the burdens onto the young but instead of acknowledging the shit shape you left your state in you, you carry your politics with you.
You even arrogantly state: why would anyone live in West Texas v. The great state of California? For certain with the eyeball test, the Amarillo, Texas area does not match the California coast. However, with so many jobs being mobile these days, the difference is astonishing. If you make $200 k per year and live in West Texas, you are rich. In California, if a guy make $200 k, given all the taxes being sucked out of the working class by California pensioners like yourself, he is middle class. And if the goal of working is to accumulate wealth, you would be crazy to live in California over West Texas.
So the logic of your idiotic claim that blue states are carrying the red ones, I might ask, with what money? How can the blue states being carrying the red ones when freeloaders like yourself are sucking the blue states dry? Only the super wealthy in the blue states have any money.
You sir are the living embodiment of why the blue states cannot be carrying the red states.
-
3 photos
Why are deadbeat Repub Red state MAGA snowflakes always so ungrateful?
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060444]Yeah, it is "helpful" to you in that when shown you are dead wrong about a subject, you criticize the link. Here is what you wrote:
You asked for it and were given it and instead of acknowledging you were wrong, you changed the subject. That is why you have the credibility of Bagdad Bob.
And this is the classic dumb Dem: being arrogant as hell on a subject they were dead wrong about and then making personal attacks.
The arrogance really raised its head with the red-blue comment about how the blue states were carrying the red states. The Californian refugee like you is among the most despicable characters in American history. You leave California with your six figure pensions and toss the burdens onto the young but instead of acknowledging the shit shape you left your state in you, you carry your politics with you.
You even arrogantly state: why would anyone live in West Texas v. The great state of California? For certain with the eyeball test, the Amarillo, Texas area does not match the California coast. However, with so many jobs being mobile these days, the difference is astonishing.[/QUOTE]Wow. I actually thanked him for the link after merely asking for it on the eventually proven true suspicion a link would not support any contention whatsoever that Trump produced any "huge economic gains" in America and you ultra-sensitive MAGA snowflakes just evaporated instantly.
I asked the question twice to give AI a chance to add or elaborate details on the topic.
Do Blue states pay more in Federal taxes to support America than they get back in value while Red states pay less than they get back in value?
[B]The AI Overview[/B]
[QUOTE]Blue states generally pay more in federal taxes than they receive in federal funding, acting as "donor states," while many red states receive more in federal spending than they contribute, acting as "recipient states". This trend is primarily driven by higher average incomes and higher tax payments in blue states.
Time Magazine
+2
Blue State Financial Flow: Blue states tend to have wealthier residents and higher economic activity, resulting in higher federal income tax payments. Between 2018 and 2022, blue states contributed roughly 60% of all federal tax receipts.
Red State Financial Flow: Many red states receive more in federal aid and programmatic support, often due to lower average incomes and higher demand for social services or federal assistance.
Regional Disparities: In a 5-year assessment, 14 of the top 20 states with the highest net positive flow of federal funds (receiving more than they pay) were red states.
Notable Exceptions: Some states, such as Virginia and Maryland, break this pattern. Although they may vote blue in federal elections, they are often major recipients of federal funds due to high federal employment and large military presences.
Time Magazine
+4
Data shows this trend is a long-standing pattern driven by economic and demographic factors rather than political affiliation alone, though it is frequently highlighted in political debates.
DC Journal
+3
..........
Yes, data generally shows that blue states pay more in federal taxes than they receive in funding, while many red states receive more in federal spending than they contribute.
Time Magazine
+2
Key Disparities
Net Donor States: In 2024, 19 states sent more to the federal government than they received. These "donor states" are predominantly high-income, urban, and Democratic-leaning.
California: Paid approximately $275.6 billion more in taxes than it received in 2024.
New York: Contributed roughly $76.5 billion more than it received.
Net Recipient States: Red states often lead in federal dependence, largely due to lower average incomes and greater needs for federal assistance.
New Mexico: Remains the most dependent state as of 2024, receiving $3.42 for every tax dollar sent to Washington.
Virginia and Maryland: Are major exceptions; though often blue-leaning, they receive massive federal inflows high federal employment and military presence.
USAFacts
+8
Why This Happens
Income Concentration: Blue states generally have higher average incomes ($14,500 per resident vs. $11,400 in red states), leading to higher tax payments.
Social Spending: Federal programs like Medicaid, Head Start, and Title I (education) disproportionately benefit red states where poverty rates are often higher.
Retirement Migration: Residents often pay Social Security and Medicare taxes in high-tax blue states during their working years, then migrate to lower-cost red states to collect those benefits.
Reddit
+3
[/QUOTE]Inarguable Conclusion: Blue states carry the load for deadbeat Red states.
Ask the question yourself for easy access to the hyper links included and seen in the above quotes.
Oh, and as always, we American tax-payers in California offer our usual heartfelt "You're welcome" to Aunt Bea, Jethro, Gomer, Goober, Tiny and you.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060363]Yes indeed, and quite right on all accounts!
BTW, what other ways, do you see China benefiting from this massive MAGA Fuhrer / Iran war cluster-fuck, other than Taiwan, in which I think China will adopt a more prolonged and patient, sort of passive aggressive approach to winning over Taiwan.[/QUOTE]Great question. On Taiwan I'm in two minds. Yes, China plays the long game and there is a good likelihood that it could wait until its very confident that it can overcome America in its arena. On the other hand I've read reports that Xi thinks they could be ready by 2028 and imagine them invading in say Sept or Oct 2028 just before the elections. Trump won't have anything to gain by challenging them and everything to lose; if there is a newcomer they will be impotent. China could just take Taiwan and who's going to do anything? The Europeans? They couldn't fight their way out of their duvets.
Ultimately, I think it's just accelerated China eclipsing America on the world stage. Geopolitical superpower status, like any natural power play- be it anthropological or in the animal kingdom- comprises soft power and hard power. The former is often mistakenly perceived as wishy washy and it's not. It's the kind of intangible respect and admiration which can be the difference between someone listening to you or giving you the middle finger. It can be what drives resources or funds to you- e. G. Students or tourists which have a substantial financial impact on you. If you're neither respected nor feared as much as you were it's obvious that this opens up a gap for an interloper. But it's the loss of hard power which will have a substantial impact. China has been already successfully trying to get Africa, Pakistan (5th largest population) and much of the Middle East shorn away from America and into its orbit. Pakistan is already well and truly under its influence, Iran is increasingly under its influence and so forth.
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3060411]61% Americans think now Trump is turning mad senile. So, must really get rid of him in November, when he is really too crazy dangerous, making messe and danger everywhere and we have to pay for his craziness, many even dying.[/QUOTE]Because of Trump, when still mollahs and unfortunately still no freedom for Iranians, but also no freedom in China and Russia which support Iran at war, but now more problems in Ormuz pass and in Gulf countries, making now gas and gaz more expensive for us and products with plastic, when plastic everywhere, will also be more expensive, thank to the crazy. He really fucked Americans with peace promises for election.
-
Here's the latest
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3060349]Did they catch Trump in the Epstein Files yet? Haven't had time to follow the news a lot lately?[/QUOTE]Trump fired Pam Biondi who was the Attorney General and in charge of releasing the Epstein Files. This occurred approximately 2 weeks before she was to be deposed by a House committee. Now, the DOJ is saying that she won't be appearing. Look folks, the DOJ cannot tell legislative branch who they can talk to bring before the committee.
This line of reasoning is nonsensical especially since Biondi no longer works for the government. Why would you force Hillary Clinton who did not know Epstein or had anything to do with the files testify? When she got there they asked her non related questions about pizza gate. LOL.
I did believe that Trump would be in the files doing anything wrong but Biondi and DOJ were acting strange throughout this process. When Biondi was asked is there any instances of Trump being involved with anyone underage. Biondi had a look on her face like doe caught in the headlights. She was prevaricating every time she got a tough question and talking back congressional members like a wayward teenaged girl.
The "performance" was performative and not a good look for an Attorney General. Trump saw this and got her out of there within weeks. The truth will come out it's matter of when not if.
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3060387]Trump is protected as president, when he appears a lot in Epstein criminal sexual business. His friend, criminal Netanyahou also avoid justice, not for same reason, with his war business.[/QUOTE]LOL, or maybe after a decade of searching, he just didn't do anything illegal and he's telling the truth? The search continues. Hahahahaha.
-
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3060429]P Iran and putting them back into the stone age, drew a red line in the sand, and worked out a cease fire .
Riiiiight. He worked out a cease fire. No what happened is he got roped into a war by Israel, had no fucking clue what he was doing or what the outcome would be, and was desperate to get out by any means possible. The Pakistanis not he worked out the ceasefire (with a little help from the Chinese) and he seized it like a starving dog. Stop presenting this fuckwit as anything other than what he is: a fucking idiot.[/QUOTE]You need to read Elvis' whole post if you haven't. He's got a more nuanced view than you think. I believe he posted when markets believed this mess was largely over, while you posted after it became apparent that it wasn't. I initially might have taken a position closer to yours than Elvis'. But now I'm a complete agnostic. This could end like George H. W. Bush's war against Iraq, a success. Or George W. Bush's, where the USA gets drawn into another "forever" war, hopefully this time without ground troops. Or something completely different, like Iran in charge of the Strait of Hormuz or regime change in Iran as a result of popular uprisings. Only time will tell. In a couple of those scenarios Trump's a hero.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060327]
At this point, I learned, 390 kilograms of enriched uranium are known by Israeli intelligence to be stored at the underground nuclear facility in Isfahan, 25 to 30 kilograms at Natanz, and 15 kilograms at bombed-out Fordow. [/QUOTE]I read that with the 60% enriched uranium, Iran had enough material to make 6 or 7 very crude bombs without further enrichment. They couldn't be delivered by missile. But Iran could sneak a bomb onto a vessel bound for New York harbor. And there would be no shortage of IRGC fanatics willing to go on a suicide mission to attack the Great Satan, achieve martyrdom, and occupy a high place in the hereafter. I don't think that would happen, but there's some small possibility Iranian leadership could decide to go out like Jim Jones.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060327]Thing is unlike other nations like North Korea or Pakistan, the Isrealis believe the Iranian muslims are crazy enough to detonate a nuke, and they have Trump buying it as well.[/QUOTE]I absolutely agree, although I would have said "some" Iranian muslims. Kim Jong Un never had a death wish. There are Iranian revolutionary guard leaders who would rather die, in preparation for the coming of the Mahdi, than live.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060460]Wow. I actually thanked him for the link after merely asking for it on the eventually proven true suspicion a link would not support any contention whatsoever that Trump produced any "huge economic gains" in America and you ultra-sensitive MAGA snowflakes just evaporated instantly.
I asked the question twice to give AI a chance to add or elaborate details on the topic.
Do Blue states pay more in Federal taxes to support America than they get back in value while Red states pay less than they get back in value?
[B]The AI Overview[/B]
Inarguable Conclusion: Blue states carry the load for deadbeat Red states.
Ask the question yourself for easy access to the hyper links included and seen in the above quotes.
Oh, and as always, we American tax-payers in California offer our usual heartfelt "You're welcome" to Aunt Bea, Jethro, Gomer, Goober, Tiny and you.[/QUOTE]This is a classic failure to appreciate Simpson's Paradox. How many welfare Democrats live in blue cities in red states? And how many Republicans live in the suburbs and commute to Dallas and Houston? How many successful business owners in California are Republicans?
Why don't you ask AI what's the average federal tax paid by Republicans versus Democrats? I did, and it said "about the same. ".
Like I said, devolve more taxation and spending and power to states and cities. Then people can do what they want instead of having it imposed on them by Washington politicians. And flight from blue cities and states will increase.
As to benefits, it's about the same for Democrats vs. Republicans looking at social security, Medicare, welfare and the like. As to defense spending and Biden's corporate pork, exactly how do apportion that? Does a military base in South Carolina just benefit the civilian residents of South Carolina? That's probably the kind of assumption your LWM sources make.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060491]I absolutely agree, although I would have said "some" Iranian muslims. Kim Jong Un never had a death wish. There are Iranian revolutionary guard leaders who would rather die, in preparation for the coming of the Mahdi, than live.[/QUOTE]I meant to say Mullahs not Muslims. Thanks for the correction.
-
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3060429]No what happened is he got roped into a war by Israel. Stop presenting this fuckwit as anything other than what he is: a fucking idiot.[/QUOTE]And this is why you have TDS. You are so anti-Trump that you do not even get what the mission is. Yes, Israel roped Trump into this war but why? Because of how much uranium Iran has. This is like Maduro all over again. You are so anti-Trump that you wanted 30 million Venezuelans to suffer. And now you have such TDS that you are okay with Iran having the bomb and being able to kill millions.
As for the "I am a fucking crazy loon" tactic, Trump keeps playing that card, and you dumb Dems (and now the Iranians) keep buying it. It just blows me away how much this tactic keeps working. You have lost two (and probably three) elections to him and you TDS fools still do not get how you are being played. You keep coming up with all these dumb excuses for why you have been so wrong about Trump, but you do not get the truth: Trump is rational, and his "I am a crazy loon" tactic keeps working because you all want him to be that crazy.
But just because Trump is rational does not mean he is right with this war. I listen to Peter Zeihan who has close ties to the military and the American military arrogance has been on full display. IMO the militaries of both the USA and Israel massively underestimated the damage Iran could do and did not properly plan for it.
I also think Trump may have pulled the trigger too fast politically speaking. He is trying to get this war over and done with before the mid terms. I get the concept that Iran would have had more missiles and drones a year from now, but the greatest military in the world should have been able to ramp up drone interceptors in no time especially given how much money we pour into the military. Trump may have missed the known fact about war: A war is easy to start but hell to end.
But if I hear one more thing about Trump going to war over the Epstein files or about some dirt the Israelis have on him, I swear that I am going to puke. That is the stupidest shit I have ever heard. He is a convicted criminal and we still put him into office.
Trump has admitted being a john, paid off a porn start to not talk after fucking her, is on his 3rd wife and hung around Epstein. We Trump voters knew all that. And you mean to tell me now that Joe Biden and James Comey had all this Epstein information and those two assholes said, "Yeah, we are not going to go there. We are going to make up this complete bullshit about Trump being a Russian agent instead. " Get the fuck out of here!
Even if you had a tape of Trump "raping" a 13 year old, I would not care, and you know why? Because you dumb Dems have lied and slung so much mud at Trump instead of trying to beat him fair and square that I could not believe anything you people would fucking say. If there was a video, I would think you used AI to create it. You tried to win an election with a bogus criminal trial and tried to impoverish him with a bullshit sexual assault charge. You had the Russiagate bullshit then you raided his fucking house and went through his wife's underwear drawer.
Are you going to admit that Russiagate was bullshit? Are you going to admit that the criminal trial was an attempt to rig an election? No? Then I do not care what fucking dirt you have this time. You had the chance to beat Trump in an election and lost because you rolled out an unqualified alcoholic unelected **** as opposition, and that is after lying about a president with obvious dementia. There is no way I could believe anything you people say about Trump.
That you all want to make this war all about Trump is nothing new. We have been listening to that bullshit for a decade. If you want to talk about Trump's decision to go to war with Iran, that is a different matter. Maybe if you talk about the issues instead of the person, you might have a chance at winning the next presidential election fair and square.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060460]Wow. I actually thanked him for the link[/QUOTE]No, you did not. You degraded him and claimed that gasoline was $2 a gallon in podunk America. The truth is that gasoline was even less than that if you take away the taxes Oklahoma taxes. I posted the same thing when I was in West Texas after buying a RV.
The really funny part is why gasoline in California is in fact so expensive. For some dumb reason, you always blame who is president on why gasoline prices are what they are. If that is the case, then Trump was wildly more successful than Biden, but that is not reality. California has its own brand of fuckery when it comes to gasoline.
From Doomberg, California is effectively two fuel islands, one clustered around San Francisco and the other around LOS Angeles. Neither half of the state is connected by inbound oil or refined product pipelines to the outside world, and links between north and south are skimpy. Northern California in particular faces an urgent crisis, as one of its few remaining petroleum refineries is shutting down, leaving the region largely unable to provide for its own gasoline, diesel, or jet fuel. Everybody sees the problem coming, and few doubt it's just a matter of time before calamity strikes.
Perhaps recognizing the light at the end of the tunnel for what it was, Newsom spent much of 2025 trying to undo some of the damage he and his party had previously caused—if for no other reason than to extend-and-pretend the reckoning beyond his remaining time in office, which closes out in January 2027. When Valero announced the upcoming closure of its Benicia refinery, Newsom responded by negotiating directly with the company, exploring a possible transfer to another refiner, and using new market-stability tools to make continued operation more attractive. However, those efforts only secured a delayed, staged idling and import-terminal plan rather than long-term continued refining at the site.
The two remaining Bay Area oil refineries—Chevron's Richmond facility and PBF Energy's Martinez complex—can supply just half of the region's needs, with much of the balance earmarked for seaborne imports. Given the unique and expensive fuel grades demanded by state regulators, new layers of risk are compounding: importing refined petroleum products, such as CARBOB gasoline or California reformulated diesel, presents its own set of substantial economic, safety, and environmental drawbacks that compound the challenges facing the state's crude supply chain. While California already brings in some finished products, relying more heavily on imports exposes consumers and the state to a much more volatile, complex, and expensive supply system. The specialized transportation fuels that are required in California are costlier to produce out of state because most refineries elsewhere are not configured to meet California's unique CARBOB specifications.
We note with interest that refined products from India—which became California's largest source of imports of the stuff in 2025—were almost certainly derived largely from Russian crude, which the US is currently attempting to sanction off global markets. So too with Chinese imports, although those likely contain a few molecules from heavily sanctioned Iran as well.
End of link.
Doomberg also has a graph linking data from California's own site about gasoline usage: [URL]https://cdtfa.ca.gov/DataPortal/dataset.htm?url=FuelGasJetStats[/URL].
Yeah, despite the electric cars being cranked out, California gasoline usage has been stubbornly high.
Yes, gasoline prices are higher now due to the war, but as I posted before, if you look at oil prices and the futures market, there is no conviction that these price increases are permanent.
That you have Spidy and his petrostate / electrostate nonsense being spewed is just proof to me that you dumb Dems still do not get it. You blast Putin while your cars ride on his oil and that of Iran. CARBOB gasoline? You Californians need your own special blend that you cannot even make in sufficient quantities? No wonder you insult Trump for higher prices but are quiet about your own insane gasoline policies.
How is it possible for blue states to be carrying red ones when you all are paying double for the price of gasoline, insurance, taxes, rent ETC? That math thingy sure has you all strung up. No wonder you all are so desperate to blame Republicans for your economic turmoil.
-
3 photos
I did too. Twice. And I see no such response.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060493]This is a classic failure to appreciate Simpson's Paradox. How many welfare Democrats live in blue cities in red states? And how many Republicans live in the suburbs and commute to Dallas and Houston? How many successful business owners in California are Republicans?
[B]Why don't you ask AI what's the average federal tax paid by Republicans versus Democrats? I did, and it said "about the same. ".[/b]Like I said, devolve more taxation and spending and power to states and cities. Then people can do what they want instead of having it imposed on them by Washington politicians. And flight from blue cities and states will increase.
As to benefits, it's about the same for Democrats vs. Republicans looking at social security, Medicare, welfare and the like. As to defense spending and Biden's corporate pork, exactly how do apportion that? Does a military base in South Carolina just benefit the civilian residents of South Carolina? That's probably the kind of assumption your LWM sources make. [/QUOTE]This is a classic failure to back up a claim with a credible source link or to at least quote the passage from an AI result that you think supports it even if it doesn't. As it doesn't in this case:
[QUOTE][b]what's the average federal tax paid by Republicans versus Democrats?[/b]
+6
Data indicates no direct, official record of "average federal tax paid" categorized by political party, as tax filings do not track party affiliation. However, partisan differences exist in tax burdens: high-income earners (often in Republican-leaning states) feel they pay a disproportionate share, while Democrats more often support progressive tax structures. Generally, 68% of Republicans view their federal taxes as too high compared to 37% of Democrats, reflecting different perceptions of fairness rather than strict average payment differences.
Pew Research Center
+4
Partisan Perspectives on Federal Taxes:
Partisan Disparity: Roughly 67% of high-income Republicans ($100k+) believe they pay too much, compared to 45% of high-income Democrats.
Perceptions of Fairness: According to, 62% of Democrats in 2025 feel the federal taxes they pay are fair, compared to only 35% of Republicans.
[B]State-Level Differences: Red states (Republican-leaning) generally prioritize lower tax rates, while blue states (Democrat-leaning) often have higher average tax burdens.[/b]
Party Goals: Republicans often focus on lower taxes for corporations and high-income families, while Democrats typically target increased taxes on the top 1%.
Gallup News
+4
.........
There is no official data tracking federal tax payments by political affiliation. However, analysis shows that Republicans generally report higher dissatisfaction with their tax burdens, with ~68% reporting taxes are too high compared to 37% of Democrats. Furthermore, 79% of upper-income Republicans feel they pay more than their fair share, compared to 57% of upper-income Democrats.
Pew Research Center
+2
Key Findings on Taxation & Political Views
[B]Partisan Tax Views: As of 2026, 68% of Republicans say their federal taxes are "too high," a sentiment shared by only 37% of Democrats.[/b]
Income Disparities: The difference in perception of paying "too high" taxes is most pronounced among high earners: 67% of Republicans earning over $100,000 feel they pay more than their fair share, compared to 45% of Democrats in the same bracket.
Party Goals: Republican initiatives often focus on extending tax cuts for high-income families and corporations, while Democratic proposals tend to target tax increases on top earners and expand credits like the Child Tax Credit.
Perceptions of Fairness: According to 2025 Gallup data, 62% of Democrats consider their tax burden fair, whereas only 35% of Republicans feel the same.
Gallup News
+5
Note: The Tax Foundation provides data on tax payments by income level, but not by political party.
Tax Foundation
+1[/QUOTE]Well, I see nothing supporting what you claimed.
However, the AI response to your question does underscore that Blue states have higher average tax burdens to help pay more for America's needs than do Red states. As I have asserted and repeatedly shown.
It's only that, being deadbeats by their very nature, high-earning Repubs "think", "feel" and "percieve" that they pay too much for those benefits for America despite the fact that Blue states pay more for them while high-earning Dems bellyache, whine and cry far, far less about paying for what benefits America than Repubs do despite the fact that their Blue states are paying more for it than Red states.
Which is exemplified by those higher burdened American tax-payers from California always offering our heartfelt "You're welcome" to Aunt Bea, Jethro, Gomer, Goober, Granny, Ellie-Mae, Uncle Jed, Elvis and you.
-
California's Newsome vs. The Pick-Pocket and Grifter MAGA Fuhrer
[QUOTE=Canada;3060337]Yes Newsome proposed a balanced budget just like he proposed the following.
Proposed High speed rail. Billions spent and no high speed rail.
Proposed fixing the homeless problem. Billions spent and more homeless year after year.
Proposed new gas tax to fix the roads and highways. Billions collected in gas tax and CA roads worst in the nation.
Proposed a balanced budget in 2025 and huge deficit.
Newsome proposal tax the millionaire to collect more taxes. Millionaires leaving state for Texas and Florida so collecting less taxes.[/QUOTE]Yes almost, but not as proud as you are, having your MAGA Fuhrer, increase the national debt by $2.25 trillion, in the first year back in charge, [URL]https://fortune.com/2026/01/20/how-much-national-debt-grew-trump-first-year-back-in-office-president/[/URL]
Yes almost, but not as proud as you are, having your MAGA Fuhrer, interfere in an sovereign election and give Argentine $40 billion (and not USA Farmers and businesses).
Yes almost, but not as proud as you are, having your corrupt MAGA Fuhrer, pick-pocket American taxpayers (so far) to the tune of $3.4 bn, into his own pockets and family pockets, while in his second term in office. [URL]https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/trump-personal-gains-and-taxpayer-costs-while-in-office-847256[/URL]
Yes almost, but not as proud as you are, having your MAGA Fuhrer, plunge the United States into insolvency. [URL]https://fortune.com/2026/03/23/us-government-insolvent-fiscal-crisis-fix/[/URL]
Yes almost, but not as proud as you are, having your MAGA Fuhrer, in illegal war after illegal war, costing $1+ billion a day (by some estimates).
Let's face it, most big utility projects will have cost overruns. But California's HSR project ran foul and suffered from a shit-ton of "right-of-way" and eminent domain legal conflicts. When the laws and legislation around "right-of-way" get cleaned up and simplified, the better off America will be for such large scale nationwide or state projects. Something I might add Florida HSR, never had.
It's a whole other conversation, but even the HSR in Florida, isn't producing the ridership, touted by Gov. Ron DeSantis, as investors are delayed again for payment owed. Which brings up a really good question, [I]"Will HSR ever really be viable and widely adopted, in the U.S.?"[/I]
According to EithTooms latest post here:[URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3059439&viewfull=1#post3059439[/URL] under Gov. Gavin Newson, California's California's $4 Trillion economy outpaces major nations and is now the world's 4th largest economy, passing Japan. That says a lot, despite all the concerns and challenges, you cite. [URL]https://www.edhat.com/california/news/under-governor-gavin-newsom-californias-4-trillion-economy-outpaces-major-nations-report-shows/[/URL]
But this much is clear, while Newsome has always had Californians best interests at heart, your MAGA Fuhrer only cares about enriching himself, his family and his billionaire cronies on the backs of hardworking Americans.
I'll finish by quoting EihTooms:
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3059439] California, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and the Dems offer a heartfelt, [b]"You're welcome, Aunt Bea, Jethro, Gomer, Tiny, Elvis and Granny. "[/b][/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060514]This is a classic failure to back up a claim with a credible source link or to at least quote the passage from an AI result that you think supports it even if it doesn't. As it doesn't in this case:
Well, I see nothing supporting what you claimed.
However, the AI response to your question does underscore that Blue states have higher average tax burdens to help pay more for America's needs than do Red states. As I have asserted and repeatedly shown.
It's only that, being deadbeats by their very nature, high-earning Repubs "think", "feel" and "percieve" that they pay too much for those benefits for America despite the fact that Blue states pay more for them while high-earning Dems bellyache, whine and cry far, far less about paying for what benefits America than Repubs do despite the fact that their Blue states are paying more for it than Red states.
Which is exemplified by those higher burdened American tax-payers from California always offering our heartfelt "You're welcome" to Aunt Bea, Jethro, Gomer, Goober, Granny, Ellie-Mae, Uncle Jed, Elvis and you.[/QUOTE]Here's what Gemini Deep Research says, as to its estimates of federal tax rates borne by Democrats vs. Republicans for the last 8 presidential elections, based on exit polls. Please note that party affiliation was based on who the respondent voted for President. So when Trump ran, there were a lot of upper income, highly taxed Republicans who didn't vote for him. They would show up as Democrats or "other" in the polls.
Average estimated tax rates:
1996 Democrat: 9. 2% Republican: 17.5%.
2000 Democrat: 9. 8% Republican: 16.2%.
2004 Democrat: 8. 5% Republican: 15.4%.
2008 Democrat: 10.1% Republican: 14.8%.
2012 Democrat: 7. 4% Republican: 18.2%
2016 Democrat: 11.5% Republican: 13.9%.
2020 Democrat: 12.8% Republican: 12.1%.
2024 Democfrat: 16.1% Republican: 11.4%.
So people voting for the Republican presidential candidate paid a lot more than their fair share up through the 2012 election. In 2016 they paid somewhat more. In 2020 the numbers were about equal. And in 2024 people voting for Kamala Harris paid a lot more than their fair share.
Basically, the poor and middle class in America were so fed up with Biden's idiotic economic policies that they voted for Trump in 2024. While upper income Americans were so fed up with Trump they voted for Harris. I of course voted for Chase Oliver, armed and gay!
State and local taxes are irrelevant to the question at hand, which is whether Republicans or Democrats contribute more per person to the federal government. Undoubtedly Californians on average pay more in total taxes, state, local and federal, than residents of other states, because of their greedy and profligate state and municipal governments. Yes indeed, blue state residents pay more taxes than red state residents. And that's why they're moving to red states.
Here's the complete report. I didn't read it.
[URL]https://gemini.google.com/share/cea9a3e7c785[/URL]
Click the down arrows for links to supporting web pages.
P.S. Ellie Mae never would have fucked you. You're too liberal.
-
Electrosate vs. Petrostate: No SA 'baseload' required, but autonomous mining trucks?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060381]Absolutely true. Spidy has used South Australia as a role model. Well, conditions for solar and wind there are among the best in the world. But for baseload power, South Australia still must rely on natural gas from the Cooper Basin and interconnects from Victoria. And Victoria generates electricity mostly from dirty, dirty coal.[/QUOTE]AEMO boss Daniel Westerman -- [I]"Australia's operational paradigm is no longer 'baseload-and-peaking', but increasingly its a paradigm of 'renewables-and-firming'.[/I] It's a crucial point to understand:
[LIST][b]Baseload is not so much a technical virtue as a business model[/b] the people who invest in coal generators, and nuclear in particular, count on those machines operating at or near full capacity most of the time. [url]https://reneweconomy.com.au/dan-tehan-fails-to-grasp-difference-between-baseload-and-firming-as-he-sprouts-nonsense-on-nuclear/[/url][/LIST]
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060381]What can I say that I haven't already said.
[URL]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/annual-co2-emissions-per-country[/URL][/QUOTE]Don't say anything! Just listen for a change!
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060381]Why do you even attempt to argue Alberta politics with an Albertan? He's going to kick your ass, if he chooses to waste the time to do so.[/QUOTE]Unlike the MAGA side of America, I am remain interested in the global south (or north) and world politics related to energy, among other things, other then when your MAGA Fuhrer is blowing up stuff. But by all means you can go back and put your MAGA blinders on.
I'm sure Canada, is quite able to speak for himself and is welcome to try, if he's not too busy, getting his ass kissed by you!
[B]Coal use dropped in China and India in 2025. It rose in USA, hiking energy costs,[/B] January 19th, 2025 [URL]https://electrek.co/2026/01/19/coal-use-dropped-in-china-and-india-in-2025-it-rose-in-usa-hiking-energy-costs/[/URL]
So in the USA, higher natural gas prices and the policy shift by the MAGA Fuhrer and his shit-show administration, which included issuing orders to keep open coal-fired plants slated for closure, led to the country posting an 8% to 13% increase in demand in 2025 and the largest absolute gains and approximately 37 million tons, leading to [U]a 2.4% increase in carbon emissions in the United States.[/U]
And while China is the largest annual CO2 emitter, it is worth mentioning, that while is not everything, it's not nothing either, as they move to electrify everything and mitigate as much of their carbon foot print as possible and how for example [I][b]Autonomous electric trucks drive China's shift to smart, green mining,[/b][/I] [URL]https://english.news.cn/20260204/0704b4e427664d83a2b746ea2a3a0e8b/c.html[/URL]
Yeah, how about that, just checkout China's smart (5 G technology) green, electrotech coal mining operations. EV mining trucks, autonomously hauling coal, to be used as electricity to power China and themselves, while saving millions in diesel fossil fuel, operation costs.
Chinese driverless, autonomous electric mining trucks [I]...the U.S. not so much![/I]
-
[QUOTE=RamDavidson84;3060470]LOL, or maybe after a decade of searching, he just didn't do anything illegal and he's telling the truth? The search continues. Hahahahaha.[/QUOTE]For sure, if was truth Nobel award, he would try to compete, same than for peace. Seem his Iranian war where Americans died, was his desperate try to try to avoid defeat on November, same than criminal Netanyahou makes war with almost everybody, to avoid Israelian justice. Still war when elections would be better for him.
-
Stop lying
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060513]No, you did not. You degraded him and claimed that gasoline was $2 a gallon in podunk America. The truth is that gasoline was even less than that if you take away the taxes Oklahoma taxes. I posted the same thing when I was in West Texas after buying a RV.
The really funny part is why gasoline in California is in fact so expensive. For some dumb reason, you always blame who is president on why gasoline prices are what they are. If that is the case, then Trump was wildly more successful than Biden, but that is not reality. California has its own brand of fuckery when it comes to gasoline.
From Doomberg, California is effectively two fuel islands, one clustered around San Francisco and the other around LOS Angeles. Neither half of the state is connected by inbound oil or refined product pipelines to the outside world, and links between north and south are skimpy. Northern California in particular faces an urgent crisis, as one of its few remaining petroleum refineries is shutting down, leaving the region largely unable to provide for its own gasoline, diesel, or jet fuel. Everybody sees the problem coming, and few doubt it's just a matter of time before calamity strikes.
Perhaps recognizing the light at the end of the tunnel for what it was, Newsom spent much of 2025 trying to undo some of the damage he and his party had previously causedif for no other reason than to extend-and-pretend the reckoning beyond his remaining time in office, which closes out in January 2027. When Valero announced the upcoming closure of its Benicia refinery, Newsom responded by negotiating directly with the company, exploring a possible transfer to another refiner, and using new market-stability tools to make continued operation more attractive. However, those efforts only secured a delayed, staged idling and import-terminal plan rather than long-term continued refining at the site..[/QUOTE][B]Thanks[/B] is right there in the Subject Line of my response to him providing a link that disproved his "huge economic gains" claim and proved my "middle of pudunk nowhere" minor blip on the disastrous Trump economy screen observation.
-
3 photos
Estimated tax rates on how much income?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060532]Here's what Gemini Deep Research says, as to its estimates of federal tax rates borne by Democrats vs. Republicans for the last 8 presidential elections, based on exit polls. Please note that party affiliation was based on who the respondent voted for President. So when Trump ran, there were a lot of upper income, highly taxed Republicans who didn't vote for him. They would show up as Democrats or "other" in the polls.
Average estimated tax rates:
1996 Democrat: 9. 2% Republican: 17.5%.
2000 Democrat: 9. 8% Republican: 16.2%.
2004 Democrat: 8. 5% Republican: 15.4%.
2008 Democrat: 10.1% Republican: 14.8%..[/QUOTE]Melania said the baby was delicious although a tad bit overdone. Swear to god.
Um. AI and all the pertinent links in the universe have pointed out that incomes are generally higher in Blue states and there are more Americans with those higher incomes in Blue states. Percentages are fun. But you must already know that smaller percentages of larger incomes can pay for more stuff than larger percentages of smaller incomes.
A 3 percentage point increase in tax rates for higher income earning Dems between 2020 and 2024 in the midst of one of the greatest Dem recoveries and private-sector jobs creation from another Great Repub Economic Disaster had nothing to do with Trump squeaking out another razor-thin election win.
Not one typically Blue state flipped to Trump in 2024.
Only one typically Dem voting demographic in the only three swing states that mattered swung just enough votes from Dem to Repub to secure the win for Trump. And it was on one issue having nothing to do with the economy, inflation, immigration, crime, pronouns or where trannies pee.
Even Trump knows he owes nothing to America's "poor and middle class" for that squeaker of a razor-thin election win by a swing of less than a single percentage point of that one demographic's votes from Dem to Repub spread across those three states. And so does Netanyahu and the Muslim Community of voters in PA, MI and WI whose less than a single percentage point swing of their potential votes in those three states secured that win for Trump.
Which is why Trump has no interest whatsoever in making life easier for the "poor and middle class" in America with his Liberation From Your Job Day Tariffs, his little bit of an excursion to skyrocket gas and energy prices, his total reversal of rally after rally promises to use only USA-made steel for his construction projects LOL etc. He knows there is nothing they gifted him with to pay them back for!
He and Netanyahu and the Muslims in those Gulf States that were to benefit from Trump's utter fiasco Iran War are the ones he is paying back for his razor-thin squeaker of an election win in 2024:
To Netanyahu for delaying the May 2024 Biden-negotiated ceasefire until after the election.
To the less than a single percentage point of Muslim Community voters in those three swing states whose anger with the Biden Administration over its support for Israel which they took for support for Netanyahu was stoked by that move by Netanyahu to swing just enough of their votes from a member of the Biden Administration to Trump in order to squeak out that razor-thin win.
To Qatar for that sweet bribe of a $400 Million airliner.
To the UAE for that sweet bribe of $Billions to bail out the Trump Crime Family's failed crypto venture.
To Saudi Arabia for that sweet bribe of $Billions to Trump's son-in-law and daughter.
Trump figured out paying back those huge favors and sweet bribes with Americans' blood, lives and tax dollars in an unprovoked Iran War was a nifty idea.
But his only interest was in pleasing his benefactors by fulfilling their wishes of America starting the Iran War. After that, he really doesn't give a shit. Of course. As far as he's concerned he did his part to pay back those folks for the great favors and bribes they lavished on him and his Crime Family. The colossal mess and expense that follows is up to them and America to deal with.
LOL. Trump, Netanyahu and those Muslim country leaders would crack up with a laugh "unlike anyone has ever heard" at your assertion that the poor and middle class in America were responsible for Trump's razor-thin squeaker of an election win in 2024. Lolol. You ought to send that to them in a tweet, a text, an email or whatever.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060514]However, the AI response to your question does underscore that Blue states have higher average tax burdens to help pay more for America's needs than do Red states. As I have asserted and repeatedly shown.[/QUOTE]Seeing as how two out of three tax dollars is just redistributed, the fucking blue states can keep right on paying for your hookers abroad. God, what a thing for someone banging hookers in Thailand to say! Here is novel idea for you and the other parasites: Pay for your own hookers and leave taxpayers the fuck alone!
-
WTF are you talking about?
With your spiel about porn stars and dems, and election losses.
It takes a level of derangement that I am incapable of even fathoming to say "But just because Trump is rational ". I cannot fathom how any sane person could see rationality in any of this.
The DF got roped into this by the nefarious nation of Israel which holds America by the balls and America does its bidding. Not because of Epstein but because 90% of the senate are taking money from AIPAC. And that's just scratching the surface. America is subservient to Israel. If you don't know that then your level of delusions are more than I can deal with.
There was no other reason for America to go to war- for the Uranium? The one they "obliterated" last year? Or the one that they were in active negotiations on with Iran? But wait, that's not the reason that he morphed into: it was regime change. But wait, it wasn't even that. It was liberating the Iranian people. In life when people throw out reasons like darts, the fact usually is that all of them are bullshit reasons and excuses. In life if you have a purpose for doing something, it's clear and lucid and doesn't need multiple other supposed reasons. And a cassus bellus needs to be just that.
Don't BS me with your "he's rational". That's crap as hell. He is capricious, naive beyond hell, has little ability to see beyond his nose let alone 2 steps ahead, and got roped into this by the Israelis who saw an opportunity to rid themselves of their biggest adversary in the region using America as their tool as they always do. THAT is the truth of the matter, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Keep bullshitting yourself if you wish but that won't change the reality.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060510]And this is why you have TDS. You are so anti-Trump that you do not even get what the mission is. Yes, Israel roped Trump into this war but why? Because of how much uranium Iran has. This is like Maduro all over again. You are so anti-Trump that you wanted 30 million Venezuelans to suffer. And now you have such TDS that you are okay with Iran having the bomb and being able to kill millions.
As for the "I am a fucking crazy loon" tactic, Trump keeps playing that card, and you dumb Dems (and now the Iranians) keep buying it. It just blows me away how much this tactic keeps working. You have lost two (and probably three) elections to him and you TDS fools still do not get how you are being played. You keep coming up with all these dumb excuses for why you have been so wrong about Trump, but you do not get the truth: Trump is rational, and his "I am a crazy loon" tactic keeps working because you all want him to be that crazy..[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3060577]It takes a level of derangement that I am incapable of even fathoming to say "But just because Trump is rational ". I cannot fathom how any sane person could see rationality in any of this.
The DF got roped into this by the nefarious nation of Israel which holds America by the balls and America does its bidding. Not because of Epstein but because 90% of the senate are taking money from AIPAC. And that's just scratching the surface. America is subservient to Israel. If you don't know that then your level of delusions are more than I can deal with.[/QUOTE]And here your own hypothesis blows up in your face. Trump is irrationally bound to Israel but so is 90% of the Senate. And? Does that mean 90% of the Senate is irrational as well? Or does it mean 90% of the Senate and Trump are rational? Or is 90% of the Senate and Trump irrational but you are the rational one?
BTW, Kamala was not just married to a white guy but married to a Jewish white guy and was a senator to boot. So in your opinion, do you think she would have acted differently? LOL.
So now we have Kamala, 90% of the Senate, and Trump are rational but you are sane? LOL. It must be nice to be so confident that you are right and everyone else is off their rocker.
-
3 photos
Neither you nor anyone else paid into my retirement income.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060564]Seeing as how two out of three tax dollars is just redistributed, the fucking blue states can keep right on paying for your hookers abroad. God, what a thing for someone banging hookers in Thailand to say! Here is novel idea for you and the other parasites: Pay for your own hookers and leave taxpayers the fuck alone![/QUOTE]At most an employer kicked in 6.75% or so of income they could have paid me but paid into FICA instead while I was delivering far more value to them than I was getting back in compensation.
Similar to Blue states like California relative to America in general and Red states in particular.
But, yeah, in a sense you are absolutely right that Blue states are now and will in the future be paying you and other deadbeat Repub MAGAs in Red states a disproportionately high percentage of any Social Security income and Medicare reimbursement you Repub MAGA Red staters need and enjoy in your retirement years.
To continue an ongoing theme over the past several decades, we American tax-payers from Blue states like California offer a very heartfelt "You're welcome" to Aunt Bea, Jethro, Granny, Gomer, Goober, Barney Fife, Uncle Jed, Tony, you and Ellie-Mae, whose butt was too big for me to be interested in fucking her, 3-4 kilos bigger than the butts of the sweet young Asian girls I prefer to fuck and get royally blown by for my well-earned retirement income money.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060561]
Estimated tax rates on how much income?[/QUOTE]We have a steeply progressive income tax system. The more money you make, the higher the tax rate. So a Republican who pays at an effective tax rate of 15% probably pays much more than 2 X the tax that a Democrat with a rate of 7. 5% pays.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060561]Melania said the baby was delicious...[/QUOTE]Yummy!
-
Inflation Spikes!
Inflation is up. But, we know the clown in the White House will continue to threaten, harass, and harangue the Fed to lower interest rates. Which would only serve to drive inflation up even more! What an incredible bozo of a clown we have in the White House right now! A totally stupid, ignorant, dangerous, and ineffective clown of a little man!
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/10/cpi-inflation-report-march-2026.html[/URL]
-
Israel
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060624]And here your own hypothesis blows up in your face. Trump is irrationally bound to Israel but so is 90% of the Senate. And? Does that mean 90% of the Senate is irrational as well? Or does it mean 90% of the Senate and Trump are rational? Or is 90% of the Senate and Trump irrational but you are the rational one?
BTW, Kamala was not just married to a white guy but married to a Jewish white guy and was a senator to boot. So in your opinion, do you think she would have acted differently? LOL.
So now we have Kamala, 90% of the Senate, and Trump are rational but you are sane? LOL. It must be nice to be so confident that you are right and everyone else is off their rocker.[/QUOTE]Here's something that just came out. Netanyahu has worked 5 US presidents. He asked G. W Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Donald Trump. He asked all 5 including Trump in his first year to attack Iran. Only one president agreed to this and it was Trump in last term.
We are being used!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060539]AEMO boss Daniel Westerman -- [I]"Australia's operational paradigm is no longer 'baseload-and-peaking', but increasingly its a paradigm of 'renewables-and-firming'.[/I] It's a crucial point to understand:
[LIST][b]Baseload is not so much a technical virtue as a business model[/b] the people who invest in coal generators, and nuclear in particular, count on those machines operating at or near full capacity most of the time. [url]https://reneweconomy.com.au/dan-tehan-fails-to-grasp-difference-between-baseload-and-firming-as-he-sprouts-nonsense-on-nuclear/[/url][/LIST][/QUOTE]
From ChatGPT, here's South Australia's total energy consumption by source. I believe SA's share of consumption from renewables should be higher than other states based on what I recall you posting, but could be wrong. These numbers are adjusted for Victoria interconnects.
Liquid petroleum products 42% to 45%
Natural Gas 30% to 34%
Renewables (wind, solar, bioenergy) 14% to 18%
Coal 3% to 6%
Other 3% to 5%
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060539]
[B]Coal use dropped in China and India in 2025. It rose in USA, hiking energy costs,[/B] January 19th, 2025 [URL]https://electrek.co/2026/01/19/coal-use-dropped-in-china-and-india-in-2025-it-rose-in-usa-hiking-energy-costs/[/URL]
So in the USA, higher natural gas prices and the policy shift by the MAGA Fuhrer and his shit-show administration, which included issuing orders to keep open coal-fired plants slated for closure, led to the country posting an 8% to 13% increase in demand in 2025 and the largest absolute gains and approximately 37 million tons, leading to [U]a 2.4% increase in carbon emissions in the United States.[/U][/QUOTE]
Did Trump really issue orders to companies to keep coal fired power plants open? I doubt it.
According to ChatGPT, more of the increase in coal consumption was caused by higher natural gas prices than MAGA Fuhrer shit-show policies. The average price of natural gas (Henry Hub) was $2.41/MMBTU in 2024 and $3.62 in 2025. That's a 50% increase.
Something similar happened in 2021 during the Biden administration. The price of natural gas shot up from an average of $2.13 per MMBTU in 2020 to $3.72 in 2021, resulting in an increase from 477 million short tons annual coal consumption to 546 million tons. And you can't blame the increase mostly on the rebound from COVID. According to ChatGPT, electricity demand in 2021 rose 3% to 4%, while coal consumption rose 14.4%.
The Energy Information Administration projects coal consumption will fall from 452 million tons in 2025 to 417 million tons in 2026.
As to the increase in carbon emissions, blame data centers. Coal is a reliable, 24 hour a day power source, which is what data centers want.
Btw, coal consumption during the first Trump Administration went down. Here's production in short tons, from the EIA,
2017 717 million tons
2018 687 million tons
2019 587 million tons
2020 477 million tons
Consumption was down by a whopping 100 million tons per year in each of 2019 and 2020. Should we give Trump all the credit for 2020? Well, by Tooms logic, we sure should. He blames the COVID recession, huge COVID deficits, and COVID deaths on Trump. If you do that you have to give him credit for the coal too!
To some extent though I share your concerns. The way to address them IMHO is through a reasonable carbon tax, designed not to affect exports. Use the proceeds to reduce the deficit or the income tax. And perhaps an equivalent tax on particulates and SO2, that would be a function of the population density in the vicinity of the power plant. That would sure beat Biden's huge corporate welfare or Obama's mandates to promote renewables, which waste taxpayer money and make markets less efficient.
We agree that the Chinese are no dummies. And they're installing new coal fired capacity. That should tell us something. The USA is not only the Saudi Arabia of natural gas, it's also the Saudi Arabia of coal.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060539]And while China is the largest annual CO2 emitter, it is worth mentioning, that while is not everything, it's not nothing either, as they move to electrify everything and mitigate as much of their carbon foot print as possible and how for example [I][b]Autonomous electric trucks drive China's shift to smart, green mining,[/b][/I] [URL]https://english.news.cn/20260204/0704b4e427664d83a2b746ea2a3a0e8b/c.html[/URL]
Yeah, how about that, just checkout China's smart (5 G technology) green, electrotech coal mining operations. EV mining trucks, autonomously hauling coal, to be used as electricity to power China and themselves, while saving millions in diesel fossil fuel, operation costs.
Chinese driverless, autonomous electric mining trucks [I]...the U.S. not so much![/I][/QUOTE]
You realize those big electric trucks involved in mining operations are mostly used to extract dirty, dirty coal? I wonder how much of the electricity used to charge those trucks comes from coal? I don't know the answer to the second question.
-
For the Love of God
[URL]https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/116377422440266990[/URL]
A video for all those that want ICE defunded and Trump impeached, you sick fucks.
-
3 photos
It's nice to hear about that again. But
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060646]We have a steeply progressive income tax system. The more money you make, the higher the tax rate. So a Republican who pays at an effective tax rate of 15% probably pays much more than 2 X the tax that a Democrat with a rate of 7. 5% pays.
Yummy![/QUOTE]What does that have to do with the fact that Blue states "run by Dems" contribute more to the Fed coffers than they get back in order to carry the load for deadbeat Red states "run by Repubs" who get back more than they pay and can't or won't cut it by paying for their own damn government entitlements and handouts they need so desperately?
Or will you change the subject to something about some dude named Simpson again since you changing the subject so dramatically and often whenever you slam into a brick wall on these issues seems not to bother fellow Repub MAGA Elvis at all?
-
And he delivers a gut punch to USA Steel workers he conned into supporting him.
[QUOTE=TheCane;3060647][b]Inflation Spikes![/b]
Inflation is up. But, we know the clown in the White House will continue to threaten, harass, and harangue the Fed to lower interest rates. Which would only serve to drive inflation up even more! What an incredible bozo of a clown we have in the White House right now! A totally stupid, ignorant, dangerous, and ineffective clown of a little man!
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/10/cpi-inflation-report-march-2026.html[/URL][/QUOTE]Yep. Biden-Harris handed him a dramatically declined CPI Inflation Rate down from the peak due to Trump's Pandemic to a more manageable 2. 9% at the end of 2024. But from that moment on Trump has been determined to drive it right back up to and beyond what his disastrous economic and national security policy decisions produced in his first term. Again, after inheriting historically positive economic results and trajectories from Obama-Biden in 2017. As GW Bush did from Clinton-Gore in 2001, Reagan-Bush did from Carter-Mondale in 1981, Nixon-Agnew did from Johnson-Humpfrey in 1969 and on and on all the way back to the beginning of the Republican MAGA Party.[/QUOTE]Not that Trump owes anything to those MAGA suckers for squeaking out that razor-thin election win in 2024 anyway. He knows full well the sole reason for that happening was that relatively tiny handful of angry Muslims in the only three swing states that mattered that Netanyahu stirred up to vote against anyone from the Biden Administration by his crafty timing of not honoring thr May 2024 Biden-negotiated ceasefire agreement until after the election.
America shedding its blood, lives and money for Trump's Iran War of choice is his payback to Netanyahu and Muslims from a few Gulf States that might benefit from it. He knows there is no need to payback USA steel or other USA manufacturing suckers he conned into supporting him for anything having to do with him squeaking out that razor-thin election win.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060686]What does that have to do with the fact that Blue states "run by Dems" contribute more to the Fed coffers than they get back in order to carry the load for deadbeat Red states "run by Repubs" who get back more than they pay and can't or won't cut it by paying for their own damn government entitlements and handouts they need so desperately?
Or will you change the subject to something about some dude named Simpson again since you changing the subject so dramatically and often whenever you slam into a brick wall on these issues seems not to bother fellow Repub MAGA Elvis at all?[/QUOTE]Please show a little initiative instead of always expecting me to spoon feed you. Look up Simpson's Paradox and you'll see it's a phenomenon in probability and statistics in which a trend appears in several groups of data but disappears or reverses when the groups are combined. And it's very relevant to the matter at hand.
If you combine all the people in all the states and counties and cities, you see that historically, before Trump, Republicans paid a lot more of the federal income tax than Democrats did. Republicans have historically subsidized Democrats. And yeah you may have 7 Democrat deadbeats in New Jersey for every three hardworking Republicans who paid a lot of federal tax. That doesn't change the fact that the Democrats were screwing the Republicans, based on your logic after considering Simpson's Paradox. Actually, what I truly believe is that everyone is getting screwed, Democrat and Republican alike, by a wasteful, inefficient federal government.
-
Trump
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060531]Yes almost, but not as proud as you are, having your MAGA Fuhrer, increase the national debt by $2.25 trillion, in the first year back in charge, [URL]https://fortune.com/2026/01/20/how-much-national-debt-grew-trump-first-year-back-in-office-president/[/URL]
Yes almost, but not as proud as you are, having your MAGA Fuhrer, interfere in an sovereign election and give Argentine $40 billion (and not USA Farmers and businesses).
Yes almost, but not as proud as you are, having your corrupt MAGA Fuhrer, pick-pocket American taxpayers (so far) to the tune of $3.4 bn, into his own pockets and family pockets, while in his second term in office. [URL]https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/trump-personal-gains-and-taxpayer-costs-while-in-office-847256[/URL]
Yes almost, but not as proud as you are, having your MAGA Fuhrer, plunge the United States into insolvency. [URL]https://fortune.com/2026/03/23/us-government-insolvent-fiscal-crisis-fix/[/URL]
Yes almost, but not as proud as you are, having your MAGA Fuhrer, in illegal war after illegal war, costing $1+ billion a day (by some estimates).[/QUOTE]What is amazing that you keep claiming all the bad things Trump is doing but the majority of Americans voted Trump in because they knew that he couldn't and wouldn't be as bad as Biden was. And they knew Harris would be worse than Biden trainwreck. Regardless of what Trump does he is still better than Biden. Those are the facts and Americans were smart enough to vote for it. As for Canada we survived the Trudeau train wreck and Carney will probably be as bad. We are screwed. Thank your lucky stars you have Trump and not a Carney. Most of the people that hate Trump hate the USA also. Liberal news in USA is cheering for Iran. Hoping Trump plan fails. Iranians love what Trump is doing. He is their only hope for freedom.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060686]Or will you change the subject to something about some dude named Simpson again since you changing the subject so dramatically and often whenever you slam into a brick wall on these issues seems not to bother fellow Repub MAGA Elvis at all?[/QUOTE]Because unlike you, Tiny lives and works in the USA, and he knows how many jobs are mobile. Look at this stat: [URL]https://www.yankeeinstitute.org/2025/10/24/one-in-four-state-employee-pension-dollars-flow-out-of-state/[/URL]
Yes, one in four pension dollars paid into the Connecticut pension system is distributed elsewhere.
According to google, Connecticut is generally more expensive than Florida, with overall cost of living estimates ranging from 12% to 17% higher depending on the data source and specific cities compared. Connecticut is generally 20.1% to 27.9% more expensive than Texas, with housing and childcare being the primary drivers of this difference.
California is 21.8% to 30% more expensive than Florida overall, driven primarily by significantly higher housing costs which are 16% to 18.9% higher in California. Texas is significantly more affordable than California, with overall cost of living indices averaging 91.5–93.9 compared to California's 140–150, making Texas roughly 40–50% cheaper to live in.
So let's be real what you mean when you say that the people who live in blue states are carrying the nation. That means they are living on less and doling out 2/3 of their tax dollars to people like yourself who no longer live in the state and are using their hard earned money to be paying for your hookers.
You can call those living in blue states patriots; I prefer the word suckers to describe them.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3060539]AEMO boss Daniel Westerman -- "Australia's operational paradigm is no longer 'baseload-and-peaking', but increasingly its a paradigm of 'renewables-and-firming'. It's a crucial point to understand:
Baseload is not so much a technical virtue as a business model the people who invest in coal generators, and nuclear in particular, count on those machines operating at or near full capacity most of the time.[/QUOTE]Now Australia is the new shining star of what to be? LOL. You need to follow the news better.
[URL]https://ieefa.org/resources/its-time-australia-reduce-its-oil-demand[/URL]
Australia has the largest trade deficit in refined oil products in the world, is the largest importer of diesel, and has the lowest oil stockpiles of all IEA members – all by a wide margin. Imports of Russian oil are currently banned in Australia; imports from the Middle East are disrupted; China recently banned exports of those three fuels; and its distance makes Europe unlikely to be a realistic supplier. The remaining candidates to provide fuel to Australia are the US, Singapore, South Korea and India.
And now the next link:
Hundreds of petrol stations across Australia run out of fuel as Labor inks supply deal with Singapore.
Concerns are now broadening to supplies of fertilizer and other chemicals, heaping more pressure on the Albanese government's leveraging of overseas exports of coal and gas in a bid to handle of the crisis.
"It's the only way, that coal and gas, that we're going to be able to keep our fuel and fertilizer coming to our country," he told a press conference.
"We are in the very lucky position that the countries we do import a lot of our food and fertilizer from are also the countries that rely on our coal and gas. So we should be making that point. ".
The shadow resources spokesperson, Susan McDonald, reportedly told the Nine newspapers that "if we can't get the straits open quickly, then lifting sanctions on Russian-produced fertilizer would be required".
End of link. Australian energy policy has left it with two options: send money to Putin or starve to death. Meanwhile, a nation dripping with fossil fuels does not have a way for most of its vehicles to run. You cannot make this stuff up.
You have neglected to mention that China, your ideal electrostate, has masssive refining capacity, and several of the regions where you climate nuts are active like Australia and California have pushed their evil refineries towards "clean" China. Well, those chickens are coming home to roost big time now. Will you climate nuts accept responsibility for your disasterous "clean energy" policies? Of course not! Hell, you are still pushing for them.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;3060647]Inflation is up. But, we know the clown in the White House will continue to threaten, harass, and harangue the Fed to lower interest rates. Which would only serve to drive inflation up even more! What an incredible bozo of a clown we have in the White House right now! A totally stupid, ignorant, dangerous, and ineffective clown of a little man!
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/10/cpi-inflation-report-march-2026.html[/URL][/QUOTE]3,3% inflation because of Trump craziness. One more failure for him after no peace, but making wars.
-
Warp 7 on the logic, Scotty
Would love to dissect whatever is going on in your head, dude.
No, the irrationality and the AIPAC lobbying are two different phenomena. The US's Govt lapdog sycophancy to its master Israel because of AIPAC and similar is not at all irrational. It's perfectly rational: Of course if your master gives you money, you do it's bidding. It's reprehensible, corrosive to democracy, utterly bad for America but it's perfectly rational.
The irrationality was referencing the fact that despite this successive Presidents have been able to hold off going to war on Iran for Israel because the quid pro quo they give to Israel (money, arms, changing US laws even) was deemed sufficient and going to war for them on Iran was a step too far. Even the walking dead Biden was able to say "no" to Israel. But this fucking idiot falls hook, line and sinker for Netanyahu's BS. There was no upside, none, for America, and multiple downsides. No rational person would have ever followed through on this. Even his own team were cool on this. This delusional fool got suckered by the Israelis that it would be over in 3 days.
It was a stupid, irrational and fucked up thing to do, and yet like I said you have deranged people like you who will still find method in his madness. There is no method, only madness.
Let's just hope and pray that this weekend's talks end in fruition, because it's causing pain to Americans, but it's causing far, far more pain to the ROW, such as the Indian who loses his job and has to move back to the village; such as the African who may starve if the fertilizers don't come through; such as. Not that you care at all about any of this suffering.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060624]And here your own hypothesis blows up in your face. Trump is irrationally bound to Israel but so is 90% of the Senate. And? Does that mean 90% of the Senate is irrational as well? Or does it mean 90% of the Senate and Trump are rational? Or is 90% of the Senate and Trump irrational but you are the rational one?
BTW, Kamala was not just married to a white guy but married to a Jewish white guy and was a senator to boot. So in your opinion, do you think she would have acted differently? LOL.
So now we have Kamala, 90% of the Senate, and Trump are rational but you are sane? LOL. It must be nice to be so confident that you are right and everyone else is off their rocker.[/QUOTE]
-
2 photos
You and Simpson are amazing
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060696]Please show a little initiative instead of always expecting me to spoon feed you. Look up Simpson's Paradox and you'll see it's a phenomenon in probability and statistics in which a trend appears in several groups of data but disappears or reverses when the groups are combined. And it's very relevant to the matter at hand.
If you combine all the people in all the states and counties and cities, you see that historically, before Trump, Republicans paid a lot more of the federal income tax than Democrats did. Republicans have historically subsidized Democrats. And yeah you may have 7 Democrat deadbeats in New Jersey for every three hardworking Republicans who paid a lot of federal tax. That doesn't change the fact that the Democrats were screwing the Republicans, based on your logic after considering Simpson's Paradox. Actually, what I truly believe is that everyone is getting screwed, Democrat and Republican alike, by a wasteful, inefficient federal government.[/QUOTE]So as long as you've got Simpson on hand to muddy the waters so hopelessly about who does what, who pays for what, which Party is represented anywhere at anytime until all you can conclude is everyone is getting screwed by everyone who gets elected even though we have only had horrific economic disasters and massive jobs destruction when Repubs are in the WH and mostly get their way and have only had historic jobs creation and boom times when Dems are in the WH and mostly get their way then you have truly earned your self-described position as a Bothsider / Neithersider.
But if you don't mind I will avoid delving into this Simpson influence that must have contributed in some way to your pathology and will continue to vote for the Party that has produced and presided over those boom times and historic jobs creation and never for the Party that has produced all of the Great Depressions, Great Recessions and Massive Job Losses over the past 100 years.
Which I can and am delighted to still do all the way here in Thailand even though I am literally on the other side of the globe away from where my tax payments carry the load for deadbeat Repubs in and out of Red states for projects, programs and benefits I don't benefit from in Thailand.
To all of you MAGAs, you're welcome for my doing that for you too.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3060701]What is amazing that you keep claiming all the bad things Trump is doing but the majority of Americans voted Trump in because they knew that he couldn't and wouldn't be as bad as Biden was. And they knew Harris would be worse than Biden trainwreck. Regardless of what Trump does he is still better than Biden. Those are the facts and Americans were smart enough to vote for it. As for Canada we survived the Trudeau train wreck and Carney will probably be as bad. We are screwed. Thank your lucky stars you have Trump and not a Carney. Most of the people that hate Trump hate the USA also. Liberal news in USA is cheering for Iran. Hoping Trump plan fails. Iranians love what Trump is doing. He is their only hope for freedom.[/QUOTE]Biden did not get us stuck in another "forever" war. He made it worse by acting like Netanyanhu's *****. Now, Iran has more power than before they converted the Strait of Hormuz into the Panama Canal. Now, everyone has to pay to get their shit through. Thanks a lot Trump!
Even people on right Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson acknowledge that Trump is a colossal clusterfuck!
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060718]Because unlike you, Tiny lives and works in the USA, and he knows how many jobs are mobile. Look at this stat: [URL]https://www.yankeeinstitute.org/2025/10/24/one-in-four-state-employee-pension-dollars-flow-out-of-state/[/URL]
Yes, one in four pension dollars paid into the Connecticut pension system is distributed elsewhere.
According to google, Connecticut is generally more expensive than Florida, with overall cost of living estimates ranging from 12% to 17% higher depending on the data source and specific cities compared. Connecticut is generally 20.1% to 27.9% more expensive than Texas, with housing and childcare being the primary drivers of this difference.
California is 21.8% to 30% more expensive than Florida overall, driven primarily by significantly higher housing costs which are 16% to 18.9% higher in California. Texas is significantly more affordable than California, with overall cost of living indices averaging 91.593.9 compared to California's 140150, making Texas roughly 4050% cheaper to live in.
So let's be real what you mean when you say that the people who live in blue states are carrying the nation. That means they are living on less and doling out 2/3 of their tax dollars to people like yourself who no longer live in the state and are using their hard earned money to be paying for your hookers.
You can call those living in blue states patriots; I prefer the word suckers to describe them.[/QUOTE]Tooms thinks we're idiots Elvis. He thinks we don't have common sense. He's obfuscating with his blue state / red state arguments.
Historically Republicans favored lower taxes, because they're the ones who shoulder an outsized part of the tax burden. And Democrats favored higher taxes, mostly because they want bigger government and more government benefits. Some also are class warriors, like Obama. Remember he told Charles Gibson raising the capital gains tax rate even if that lowered government revenues might just be a good idea. (People don't sell as much stuff when the capital gains tax rate is too high, ergo the government collects less in revenues from the tax.) Obama's reasoning, that makes the system fairer. Well, that's open to debate, but it definitely makes everyone poorer.
Anyway, historically, why would most of the people getting taxed out the ass vote for Democrats? And why would people sucking off the federal government tit vote for Republicans? That's a rhetorical question.
Admittedly, Trump was such a polarizing candidate that he drove a lot of Republicans to sit out elections or vote for Democrats, especially after his 2020/2021 election shenanigans. And Biden did the reverse. When you engineer high inflation that makes peoples real (inflation adjusted) wages go down, many poorer and middle class Americans won't vote for you.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060771]So as long as you've got Simpson on hand to muddy the waters so hopelessly about who does what, who pays for what, which Party is represented anywhere at anytime until all you can conclude is everyone is getting screwed by everyone who gets elected even though we have only had horrific economic disasters and massive jobs destruction when Repubs are in the WH and mostly get their way and have only had historic jobs creation and boom times when Dems are in the WH and mostly get their way then you have truly earned your self-described position as a Bothsider / Neithersider.
But if you don't mind I will avoid delving into this Simpson influence that must have contributed in some way to your pathology and will continue to vote for the Party that has produced and presided over those boom times and historic jobs creation and never for the Party that has produced all of the Great Depressions, Great Recessions and Massive Job Losses over the past 100 years.
Which I can and am delighted to still do all the way here in Thailand even though I am literally on the other side of the globe away from where my tax payments carry the load for deadbeat Repubs in and out of Red states for projects, programs and benefits I don't benefit from in Thailand.
To all of you MAGAs, you're welcome for my doing that for you too.[/QUOTE]Quit playing dumb Tooms.
In a deep research query, I instructed Gemini to update my previous query, and show (a) estimated average federal tax paid by Republicans versus Democrats instead of tax rates, (b) adjust for inflation and report in 2026 dollars, and (c) go back to 1988. Here's what it gives me. For each year, this shows average estimated federal tax paid by Democrats then average federal tax paid by Republicans. For example, the average tax paid by Democrats in 1988, adjusted for inflation, was $9210 and the average paid by Republicans was $31,260.
Year Dem. Repub.
1988 $9,210 $31,260.
1992 $8,240 $29,180.
1996 $6,730 $22,090.
2000 $7,290 $24,150.
2004 $6,290 $22,900.
2008 $8,890 $22,840.
2012 $5,030 $24,450.
2016 $11,280 $18,990.
2020 $17,230 $12,760.
2024 $18,990 $11,090.
Historically the Republicans have gotten fucked, big time. That changed after four years of Trump, in the 2020 election, when poor and middle class voters got sucked in by the MAGA movement and later rebelled against Bidenflation. But I bet after Trump's gone, people who vote for the Republican candidate for president will resume paying multiples more than "their fair share. ".
Please recall that Gemini used exit polls, and assumed that if the person voted for the Republican presidential candidate, he was a Republican. And vice versa.
Here's the link to the complete report, which includes references.
[URL]https://gemini.google.com/share/1a8bf9dc2943[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3060701]the majority of Americans voted Trump in[/QUOTE]Incorrect. Trump did not receive a majority of the popular vote.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060830]Quit playing dumb Tooms.
In a deep research query, I instructed Gemini to show estimated average federal tax paid by Republicans versus Democrats i
[URL]https://gemini.google.com/share/1a8bf9dc2943[/URL][/QUOTE]I must have missed the line on the Form 1040 where taxpayers identify by political party, most likely because there isn't one. So must throw the bullshit card.
-
Iran war is 6 weeks and in a ceasefire
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3060792]Biden did not get us stuck in another "forever" war. He made it worse by acting like Netanyanhu's *****. Now, Iran has more power than before they converted the Strait of Hormuz into the Panama Canal. Now, everyone has to pay to get their shit through. Thanks a lot Trump!
Even people on right Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson acknowledge that Trump is a colossal clusterfuck![/QUOTE]Iran war was started 47 years ago by Iran. It is 6 weeks in and Iran has lost their air force and navy. 6 weeks in and USA is in a ceasefire. Biden didn't start any wars but because he was so weak Putin started the Ukraine war thanks to Biden incompetence. The Biden war is now 5 years in. Every competent president in the past 47 years knew that Iran would have to be stopped one day but didn't have the balls to do it. CNN poll just showed that people on the right support weakening a terrorist country with nuclear weapons. All the children and grandchildren world wide will be thanking Trump in years to come. I know western Canada will be thanking Trump. The one thing I noticed over the years is Canada is more patriotic now than ever before and now only 50% of the USA is patriotic. Only republicans are patriotic. Democrats are pretty much anti American as was shown in the paid No Kings protests. Not one democrat was carrying an American flag. They were carrying Mexican, Palestine, terrorist, and communist signs. That shows the world what democrats stand for. I understand you do not support the USA and that is free speech so more power to you.
-
2 photos
Nope. Those are not the facts.
[QUOTE=Canada;3060701]What is amazing that you keep claiming all the bad things Trump is doing but the majority of Americans voted Trump in because they knew that he couldn't and wouldn't be as bad as Biden was. And they knew Harris would be worse than Biden trainwreck. Regardless of what Trump does he is still better than Biden. Those are the facts and Americans were smart enough to vote for it. As for Canada we survived the Trudeau train wreck and Carney will probably be as bad. We are screwed. Thank your lucky stars you have Trump and not a Carney. Most of the people that hate Trump hate the USA also. Liberal news in USA is cheering for Iran. Hoping Trump plan fails. Iranians love what Trump is doing. He is their only hope for freedom.[/QUOTE]The majority of Americans never voted for Trump. Ever. Not in his three tries at it.
The majority of the American electorate never voted for Trump either. In 2024, the majority of the votes went to "Not Trump. "
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election[/URL]
In 2024 Trump got 49.8% of the vote. "Not Trump" got 50.2% of the vote with 48.3% going to Harris.
With Trump only getting 1. 5 of a percentage point more votes than Harris, a swing of approximately 0. 75 of a single percentage point of votes from him to her would have given her the plurality of votes instead of him. That doesn't speak well for the difference, as you would have it, between a president so great you want him to do to your country what he has done to the USA and a "train wreck. ".
In fact, looking at the approximately 3,000,000 fewer votes Trump got than Hillary Clinton, the approximately 7,000,000 fewer votes he got than Joe Biden and the approximately 2,200,000 more votes he got than Kamala Harris, he is still losing vs his opponents in these races by at least 8 million votes.
-
Clown
[QUOTE=TheCane;3060647]Inflation is up. But, we know the clown in the White House will continue to threaten, harass, and harangue the Fed to lower interest rates. Which would only serve to drive inflation up even more! What an incredible bozo of a clown we have in the White House right now! A totally stupid, ignorant, dangerous, and ineffective clown of a little man!
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/10/cpi-inflation-report-march-2026.html[/URL][/QUOTE]If Trump is a clown for 3% inflation then what does that m add me Biden with his 10% inflation? Biden inflation over his 4 years was over 22%. It is amazing that Trump has done so well after Biden regulations and policies drove inflation to the highest in 40 years. It takes time to stop a train wreck.
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3060792]Biden did not get us stuck in another "forever" war. He made it worse by acting like Netanyanhu's *****. Now, Iran has more power than before they converted the Strait of Hormuz into the Panama Canal. Now, everyone has to pay to get their shit through. Thanks a lot Trump!
Even people on right Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson acknowledge that Trump is a colossal clusterfuck![/QUOTE]With Reagan, Trump is less clever ever president of USA. Some members of his family tell who he is for real.
-
2 photos
Anybody who fell for that BS isn't just playing dumb
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060828]Tooms thinks we're idiots Elvis. He thinks we don't have common sense. He's obfuscating with his blue state / red state arguments.
Historically Republicans favored lower taxes, because they're the ones who shoulder an outsized part of the tax burden. And Democrats favored higher taxes, mostly because they want bigger government and more government benefits. Some also are class warriors, like Obama. Remember he told Charles Gibson raising the capital gains tax rate even if that lowered government revenues might just be a good idea. (People don't sell as much stuff when the capital gains tax rate is too high, ergo the government collects less in revenues from the tax.) Obama's reasoning, that makes the system fairer. Well, that's open to debate, but it definitely makes everyone poorer.[/QUOTE]Just because your kiddie-diddling hero Larry Summers favored his Trump / Epstein Cult friends with that horseshit about Biden causing inflation shouldn't mean a well-informed person ought to fall for it.
Please explain how Biden "engineered" double digit inflation in over half the world's economies during and in the aftermath of Trump's Pandemic while still keeping the USA inflation rate no higher than 9. 1% for only 2-3 months in 2022 while also producing one of if not THE best and strongest recovery from it on Earth.
[B]In the U.S. and around the world, inflation is high and getting higher.
June 15, 2022[/B]
[URL]https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/06/15/in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world-inflation-is-high-and-getting-higher/[/URL]
[B]The US recovery from COVID-19 in international comparison.
Oct. 17, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-us-recovery-from-covid-19-in-international-comparison/[/URL]
[B]Mapped: Cumulative Global Inflation by Country (2020-2025)
Sept. 29, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.visualcapitalist.com/global-inflation-by-country-2020-2025/[/URL]
You cannot possibly claim to know anything whatsoever about the Real World Economy while still hanging onto that Repub MAGA bullshit about how Joe Biden "engineered" the inflation suffered around the globe as the result of the worldwide economic disaster of Trump's Pandemic.
Next you'll be telling us Joe Biden made the price of eggs skyrocket, nevermind the Avian Flu epidemic, but then the hens had a meeting and decided to celebrate the razor-thin squeaker of an election win for Donald Trump by laying cheaper eggs.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3060837]If Trump is a clown for 3% inflation then what does that m add me Biden with his 10% inflation? Biden inflation over his 4 years was over 22%. It is amazing that Trump has done so well after Biden regulations and policies drove inflation to the highest in 40 years. It takes time to stop a train wreck.[/QUOTE]You're misguided. Biden's peak for the CPI increase occurred in June 2022 at 9.1%, not 10%. Inflation at the end of his presidency dropped all the way down to 2.9%. Trump's initial number was one in decline, not one in the middle of a wreck.
The present number under Trump stands at 3.3% from March 2026, marking the highest rate since May 2024 thanks to the Iran war and tariff actions. The gas prices have crossed $4 per gallon, and it looks like the train that Trump supposedly stopped is accelerating once again.
Stopping a wrecking train is one thing, but being its driver is something else entirely.
-
Exactly
[QUOTE=Huacho;3060834]I must have missed the line on the Form 1040 where taxpayers identify by political party, most likely because there isn't one. So must throw the bullshit card.[/QUOTE]Socialists make up bullshit every day. And they can even find a socialist media source for their bullshit. Just look at the posts on this thread.
-
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3060767]Would love to dissect whatever is going on in your head, dude.
No, the irrationality and the AIPAC lobbying are two different phenomena. The US's Govt lapdog sycophancy to its master Israel because of AIPAC and similar is not at all irrational. It's perfectly rational: Of course if your master gives you money, you do it's bidding. It's reprehensible, corrosive to democracy, utterly bad for America but it's perfectly rational.[/QUOTE]Now you call me crazy but Trump is rational? LOL. You are the one not being rational.
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3060767]The irrationality was referencing the fact that despite this successive Presidents have been able to hold off going to war on Iran for Israel because the quid pro quo they give to Israel (money, arms, changing US laws even) was deemed sufficient and going to war for them on Iran was a step too far.[/QUOTE]Saying things always stay the same is more of your being irrational.
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3060767]Even the walking dead Biden was able to say "no" to Israel.[/QUOTE]Nope, when Israel slaughtered those in Gaza Biden did no lift a finger. He gave Israel the weapons to do it.
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3060767]But this fucking idiot falls hook, line and sinker for Netanyahu's BS. There was no upside, none, for America, and multiple downsides. No rational person would have ever followed through on this. Even his own team were cool on this. This delusional fool got suckered by the Israelis that it would be over in 3 days.
It was a stupid, irrational and fucked up thing to do, and yet like I said you have deranged people like you who will still find method in his madness. There is no method, only madness.
Let's just hope and pray that this weekend's talks end in fruition, because it's causing pain to Americans, but it's causing far, far more pain to the ROW, such as the Indian who loses his job and has to move back to the village; such as the African who may starve if the fertilizers don't come through; such as. Not that you care at all about any of this suffering.[/QUOTE]I just posted the explanation as to what has changed and how much uranium Iran had. Iran has missiles that have reached Turkey and were sent to hit Diego Garcia far from Iran. It is just a matter of time before they had ones capable of hitting the USA. As for your cheap shot about suffering, I could say the same about you; you do not care if Iran has the bomb and the missiles to hit the USA.
To be clear, Trump has been impulsive on foreign policy with regards to tariffs and the visa situation. I thought some of the tariffs were a good idea but he way overplayed his hand with them.
In fact, I think Trump's sales job on the war has been very poor. He has opened the door to criticism as he is not sold well why we need to be at war.
I was just hoping that Trump was not irrational for going to war, and I am not sure that he has been. I was cynical like you, but I read and quoted the piece by Seymour Hersh, and he has the best government sources of anyone I have seen.
He wrote a piece on Biden blowing up Nordstream that IMO was flawless. He reported we were going to bomb Iran before we did and now he is reporting that the USA will have boots on the ground in Iran and the reason for it. If you are a dumb Dem, the tired response is to bash anyone saying anything you do not like. The truth is that I quoted only Hersh's sources and not his opinion of Trump. He criticized Trump quite harshly in the same article I quoted from.
And just because I list why Trump is doing what he is doing does not mean I agree with it. You can be rational and still be wrong. If the talks break down and Trump sends in troops and they do not find the uranium and get slaughtered, then I will have no problem saying that he made the wrong decision. The problem with you dumb Dems is even when Trump has a successful mission like he did with Venezuela and Maduro, you all keep calling him crazy which means you all are the irrational ones.
-
22.1% over 4 years
[QUOTE=FutureDeadGuy;3060862]You're misguided. Biden's peak for the CPI increase occurred in June 2022 at 9.1%, not 10%. Inflation at the end of his presidency dropped all the way down to 2.9%. Trump's initial number was one in decline, not one in the middle of a wreck.
The present number under Trump stands at 3.3% from March 2026, marking the highest rate since May 2024 thanks to the Iran war and tariff actions. The gas prices have crossed $4 per gallon, and it looks like the train that Trump supposedly stopped is accelerating once again.
Stopping a wrecking train is one thing, but being its driver is something else entirely.[/QUOTE]Biden inflation was 22.1% over 4 years causing the higher costs. Trump first year 2.7% and it is only 3% short term and year will stabilize at around 2.7%. This would make Trump inflation 10-11% for his 4 years of it holds but once Biden regulations are all removed prices will start coming down. Oil prices are short term so it will go back down to 2. 7 or less. There will never be another train wreck like Biden created. Trudeau did the same thing in Canada. Both will be known as worse leaders in Canada and USA history.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3060867]Socialists make up bullshit every day. And they can even find a socialist media source for their bullshit. Just look at the posts on this thread.[/QUOTE]Sounds like you must not be well read. Anything that disagrees with whatever faux news told you to believe is socialist? You seem to be missing any data other than whatever you've convinced yourself of.
Just look at your posts on this thread.
-
3 photos
You missed the 18 Trump holes-in-one
[QUOTE=Canada;3060867]Socialists make up bullshit every day. And they can even find a socialist media source for their bullshit. Just look at the posts on this thread.[/QUOTE]On the other hand, you and the MAGAs in America make up bullshit by the hour and can't even find a media source to back it up.
Your litany of made up bullshit Biden failures and made up bullshit Trump accomplishments is hilarious. Really. You cite many of the MAGA Hit Parade of Easily Debunked Lies even faster than some of the long-term MAGA busllshiters in the USA that promote the bullshit and might actually think "Republicans handle the economy better than Democrats" contrary to all available evidence and data going back at least 100 years of Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions and Great Repub Massive Jobs Destruction.
Hey, remember when Dear Leader Trump scored 18 holes-in-one on one of his own failing golf courses? That's what it said on the scorecard he scribbled out himself at least. Must be true.
Did you see Melania cough up a baby rib bone during her "I didn't participate, I just watched" recent press conference? The whole world saw it! Swear to god!
I think the press corp thought she was finally showing up to make good on her Record High Lying husband's promise that she would explain the timeline on her arrival in the USA and starting to working vs her status as an immigrant to legally work "in about two weeks" that he made, oh, 10 years ago. LOL.
-
[QUOTE=Huacho;3060834]I must have missed the line on the Form 1040 where taxpayers identify by political party, most likely because there isn't one. So must throw the bullshit card.[/QUOTE]Democrat
[QUOTE=Canada;3060867]Exactly.[/QUOTE]Canadian Liberal aka Trudeau lover. Unless you're saying Huacho is a socialist in which case I take that back.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060844]Just because your kiddie-diddling hero Larry Summers favored his Trump / Epstein Cult friends with that horseshit about Biden causing inflation shouldn't mean a well-informed person ought to fall for it.
Please explain how Biden "engineered" double digit inflation in over half the world's economies during and in the aftermath of Trump's Pandemic while still keeping the USA inflation rate no higher than 9. 1% for only 2-3 months in 2022 while also producing one of if not THE best and strongest recovery from it on Earth.
[B]In the U.S. and around the world, inflation is high and getting higher.
June 15, 2022[/B]
[URL]https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/06/15/in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world-inflation-is-high-and-getting-higher/[/URL]
[B]The US recovery from COVID-19 in international comparison.
Oct. 17, 2024[/B]
[URL]https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-us-recovery-from-covid-19-in-international-comparison/[/URL]
[B]Mapped: Cumulative Global Inflation by Country (2020-2025)
Sept. 29, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.visualcapitalist.com/global-inflation-by-country-2020-2025/[/URL]
You cannot possibly claim to know anything whatsoever about the Real World Economy while still hanging onto that Repub MAGA bullshit about how Joe Biden "engineered" the inflation suffered around the globe as the result of the worldwide economic disaster of Trump's Pandemic.
Next you'll be telling us Joe Biden made the price of eggs skyrocket, nevermind the Avian Flu epidemic, but then the hens had a meeting and decided to celebrate the razor-thin squeaker of an election win for Donald Trump by laying cheaper eggs.[/QUOTE]
Democratic Party True Believer and Polemicist
Do you really want to argue this again? Excessive stimulus spending engineered by Biden and other Democrats ignited inflation first in the USA, and later in other countries as demand from the USA drove up the prices of commodities and imported manufactured goods and stretched supply chains. Yes, Democrat former Treasury Secretary and Chairman of the NEC Larry Summers agrees with me. So does Democrat economist Jason Furman.
And yeah other factors contributed, like COVID related factory closures and the Ukrainian war. But your party kicked the whole mess off.
-
1 photos
You mean the global supply-chains that had collapsed thanks to Trump
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060889]Democrat
Canadian Liberal aka Trudeau lover. Unless you're saying Huacho is a socialist in which case I take that back..[/QUOTE]There would have been no reason for the global manufacturers and supply-chains to fire up and start manufacturing and shipping products anywhere until the biggest national customer on the planet had money in its pocket to start ordering products again after Trump's disastrous decisions in 2019 ushered in his Pandemic and crashed them.
In that way Biden's and the Dems' (and momentarily Trump's because the Dems insisted on it, but especially Biden / Dems' steady follow up legislation) stimulus measures revived and recovered The World's Economy and not just America's. The fact that there was No Global Depression a la The Great Repub Depression nor even a Global Recession due to Trump's Pandemic is virtually all Biden's doing.
Your kiddie-diddler hero Larry Summers could not gaze above a 10 year old's crotch area long enough to see the big picture in how Biden getting "too much" passed by a dime or two in the face of an inevitable Great Depression and Great Recession-loving Repub Majority just 2 years later, with a new virus spreading like wildfire across America and the rest of the world, the MAGA Lord pooh-poohing the idea of even taking the vaccine for it and nobody yet knowing if the long term effects of infection would kill even more hundreds of thousands of Americans than Trump had already Mass Murdered along with more manufacturers and supply-chains in paralysis 2 years later, 3, 4 or more.
It was the right move for America to be the first with the greatest stimulus and consequently the first transitory wave of unavoidable recovery inflation in order to get the world's economies moving again. No other nation had the power, means or, obviously, the ability to afford a piddling momentary 9. 1% inflation rate before it dramatically and steadily declined well into 2023 and 2024 in order to deal with the colossal mess of everything Trump handed the world.
As he is doing again today.
You can't possibly be so lacking in understanding of economics in the Real World not to know the Demand and the Ability to Pay for it had to come before the Supply would be manufactured and shipped from anywhere after Trump's disastrous decisions in 2018 and 2019 and his spectacular mismanagement of his colossal blunders all through 2020 was the order of things and not the other way around.
Or can you?
-
Bidenflation!
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3060907]There would have been no reason for the global manufacturers and supply-chains to fire up and start manufacturing and shipping products anywhere until the biggest national customer on the planet had money in its pocket to start ordering products again after Trump's disastrous decisions in 2019 ushered in his Pandemic and crashed them.
In that way Biden's and the Dems' (and momentarily Trump's because the Dems insisted on it, but especially Biden / Dems' steady follow up legislation) stimulus measures revived and recovered The World's Economy and not just America's. The fact that there was No Global Depression a la The Great Repub Depression nor even a Global Recession due to Trump's Pandemic is virtually all Biden's doing.
Your kiddie-diddler hero Larry Summers could not gaze above a 10 year old's crotch area long enough to see the big picture in how Biden getting "too much" passed by a dime or two in the face of an inevitable Great Depression and Great Recession-loving Repub Majority just 2 years later, with a new virus spreading like wildfire across America and the rest of the world, the MAGA Lord pooh-poohing the idea of even taking the vaccine for it and nobody yet knowing if the long term effects of infection would kill even more hundreds of thousands of Americans than Trump had already Mass Murdered along with more manufacturers and supply-chains in paralysis 2 years later, 3, 4 or more.
It was the right move for America to be the first with the greatest stimulus and consequently the first transitory wave of unavoidable recovery inflation in order to get the world's economies moving again. No other nation had the power, means or, obviously, the ability to afford a piddling momentary 9. 1% inflation rate before it dramatically and steadily declined well into 2023 and 2024 in order to deal with the colossal mess of everything Trump handed the world.
As he is doing again today.
You can't possibly be so lacking in understanding of economics in the Real World not to know the Demand and the Ability to Pay for it had to come before the Supply would be manufactured and shipped from anywhere after Trump's disastrous decisions in 2018 and 2019 and his spectacular mismanagement of his colossal blunders all through 2020 was the order of things and not the other way around.
Or can you?[/QUOTE]Thanks to the Democrats' American Rescue Plan and other stimulus spending, [B]excess[/B] personal savings peaked around 2. 2 trillion in the summer of 2021. When people spent down the huge excess, it drove demand and inflation. Wages didn't increase as fast as prices of goods and services. So the American Workingman lost purchasing power. He became poorer.
Ironically, by giving away free money and free stuff, the Democratic Party came out the loser in 2024. Even Trump, an extremely poor general election candidate, won.
Trumps interference in supply chains in 2017 to 2020, principally through tariffs on China, didnt cause inflation to become a problem. 2025 is a different story, although YoY inflation still isnt close to the peaks during the Biden administration.
As to your other claim, the Trump Adminstration, Pfizer, and Moderna saved hundreds of thousands of lives by accelerating vaccine development with Operation Warp Speed. If memory serves me correctly Trump took the vaccine. And he was rightly proud of it.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3060837]If Trump is a clown for 3% inflation then what does that m add me Biden with his 10% inflation? Biden inflation over his 4 years was over 22%. It is amazing that Trump has done so well after Biden regulations and policies drove inflation to the highest in 40 years. It takes time to stop a train wreck.[/QUOTE]Too old and senile Trump is used to play bad clown putting messe in everything, killing Americans and making lost jobs and inflation. I would not understand if he is not fired in November, after his lies about peace and many failures. A loser putting shame on USA. Go to play golf.
-
Let's make things up as we go along
You mean they had the uranium that they were in dialogue and negotiations and which they were demonstrating agreeability to not have nukes before the attack by America, and now which they have reneged upon because "America isn't trustworthy"? How did this rationality work out for you? You just cannot get to admit it can you? That he had no reason, had no plan, had no end game, had no strategy and operated capriciously. Backward engineering "reasons" is precisely what you're doing right now, and if you're too dumb to admit this, then I pity you dude.
He's fucked America with his tariffs and now with this, and he's fucking the world too, and he has 2 more years to go.
Here's something for you to mull over when you insist in your brain at what a super genius he and his team are:
The top four members of Iran's negotiating team:
-PhD.
-PhD.
-PhD.
-PhD.
(and, of course, the President of Iran is a heart surgeon).
Top echelon of US negotiating team:
-Trump's son-in-law, crooked real estate heir, Saudi "prince"-dictator's best friend and notorious Israeli agent.
-Trump's golf buddy, crooked real estate businessman and notorious Israeli asset.
-Trump's vice-president, a failed author with no real power or agency.
-CENTCOM military commander, highly illiterate 'valet' who has already dishonoured his uniform and betrayed his oath in the last 44 days of brutal, unscrupulous and illegal war of aggression and genocidal threats against Iran.
Your fuhrer is playing 3 Dementia chess with Grandmasters.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060871]Now you call me crazy but Trump is rational? LOL. You are the one not being rational.
Saying things always stay the same is more of your being irrational.
Nope, when Israel slaughtered those in Gaza Biden did no lift a finger. He gave Israel the weapons to do it.
I just posted the explanation as to what has changed and how much uranium Iran had. Iran has missiles that have reached Turkey and were sent to hit Diego Garcia far from Iran.[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060957]Ironically, by giving away free money and free stuff, the Democratic Party came out the loser in 2024. Even Trump, an extremely poor general election candidate, won.[/QUOTE]That is what gets me with the Dems. Trump was seen as an antidote to the Dems madness. DEI and a DEI presidential candidate, trans men in women's sports, white men being the root of all evil, out of control censorship, the idiotic lawfare, lying about Biden's mental state, and a rigged primary where the Democratic candidate was picked by the elites. It is important to remember how critical Democratic stupidity was in getting Trump elected.
Thing is Bill Maher warned the Dems. He said Trump was seen as the man who could defend America against all the crazies and Maher acknowledged it unlike other Dems. Thing is you got Tooms blasting Maher as a bothsider and Republicans which cracks me up. Maher was correctly being critical of the Democrats as they were running off of a cliff.
I think once the Dems have an open primary season and do not rig it, they will get an electable candidate. Trump has gone way too far and alienated even his supporters. He is not working deals but flying off the handle impulsively. While I disagree in part with it, the image of Trump being Israel's beetch is going to bite the Republicans in the butt.
And if the Dems elect a halfway rational candidate in 2028 like the governor of PA or KY versus an alcoholic brain dead hooker who literally sucked her way to the top, the election is theirs to lose. Unless the war in Iran is won in quick and spectacular fashion, which is very much in doubt, the Republicans are going to get slaughtered in the mid-terms.
I was told if there was an impeachment and a private versus public ballot in the a Senate, Trump being gone would be a done deal. I think he has only 20 Republicans senators who really support him. The irony is that impeachment may be the Republican's saving grace. If JD Vance becomes president after an impeachment and is just not the impulsive egotistical blowhard Trump is, and he really is not like that, then the Republicans may have a chance in 2028.
-
Low brained, megaloman Trump wants same Arc Triomphe than in Paris, but he will never get same culture. Pathetic guy spending billions, also in White House and new building in Miami, and Americans will have to pay.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060973]That is what gets me with the Dems. Trump was seen as an antidote to the Dems madness. DEI and a DEI presidential candidate, trans men in women's sports, white men being the root of all evil, out of control censorship, the idiotic lawfare, lying about Biden's mental state, and a rigged primary where the Democratic candidate was picked by the elites. It is important to remember how critical Democratic stupidity was in getting Trump elected.
Thing is Bill Maher warned the Dems. He said Trump was seen as the man who could defend America against all the crazies and Maher acknowledged it unlike other Dems. Thing is you got Tooms blasting Maher as a bothsider and Republicans which cracks me up. Maher was correctly being critical of the Democrats as they were running off of a cliff.
I think once the Dems have an open primary season and do not rig it, they will get an electable candidate. Trump has gone way too far and alienated even his supporters. He is not working deals but flying off the handle impulsively. While I disagree in part with it, the image of Trump being Israel's beetch is going to bite the Republicans in the butt.
And if the Dems elect a halfway rational candidate in 2028 like the governor of PA or KY versus an alcoholic brain dead hooker who literally sucked her way to the top, the election is theirs to lose. Unless the war in Iran is won in quick and spectacular fashion, which is very much in doubt, the Republicans are going to get slaughtered in the mid-terms.
I was told if there was an impeachment and a private versus public ballot in the a Senate, Trump being gone would be a done deal. I think he has only 20 Republicans senators who really support him. The irony is that impeachment may be the Republican's saving grace. If JD Vance becomes president after an impeachment and is just not the impulsive egotistical blowhard Trump is, and he really is not like that, then the Republicans may have a chance in 2028.[/QUOTE]LOL Elvis, about Maher. Yes, our friend Tooms does have more in common with the hard core MAGA crowd than he'd care to admit. You do see people like Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelley and Candace Owens seriously questioning the President's judgement on certain matters. Tooms on the other hand seems inclined to defend absolutely any move by a Democrat president.
Trump's going to have to follow through on some of his more spectacular ideas, like bombing Iran back to the stone age, before he'd be removed via the 25th amendment or impeached by the Senate. I don't think that's going to happen. As you well know some of his more ridiculous statements are actually negotiating ploys. And when he fucks up, like letting Stephen Miller, Kristi Noem and Greg Bovino call the shots at ICE, he changes course.
I agree with you about the Democrats' chances if they select a good candidate. But who's left? Maybe Fetterman or like you say one of the governors. They ran off Sinema and Manchin. A rational Democratic governor wouldn't be a bad outcome at all PROVIDED Republicans controlled the Senate and / or House, like they did in Clinton's 2nd term. I have a feeling though that Democrats will sweep the presidency, Senate and House in 2028, and progressives will rule the roost. I hope I'm wrong.
I do like the way Vance thinks on defense, and he's an excellent orator, regardless of whether he believes what he's saying or not. I'd prefer Rand Paul for 2028, but that's very unlikely to happen. Rand I believe would be a strong general election candidate. If he's the candidate, I definitely wouldn't vote for the Libertarian, like I did in the last 3 elections. I'd probably vote for Vance too if he's running against a progressive.
-
2 photos
Not even close. None of it.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060957]Thanks to the Democrats' American Rescue Plan and other stimulus spending, [B]excess[/B] personal savings peaked around 2. 2 trillion in the summer of 2021. When people spent down the huge excess, it drove demand and inflation. Wages didn't increase as fast as prices of goods and services. So the American Workingman lost purchasing power. He became poorer.
Ironically, by giving away free money and free stuff, the Democratic Party came out the loser in 2024. Even Trump, an extremely poor general election candidate, won.
Trumps interference in supply chains in 2017 to 2020, principally through tariffs on China, didnt cause inflation to become a problem. 2025 is a different story, although YoY inflation still isnt close to the peaks during the Biden administration.
As to your other claim, the Trump Adminstration, Pfizer, and Moderna saved hundreds of thousands of lives by accelerating vaccine development with Operation Warp Speed. If memory serves me correctly Trump took the vaccine. And he was rightly proud of it.[/QUOTE]Biden and the Dems had nothing to do with the Global Inflation that occurred during and in the wake of Trump's Pandemic. That 9. 1% momentary peak in the USA economy's rate of inflation under Biden while he was also recovering the millions of jobs Trump had wiped out and going on to create millions more than all three previous Repub presidents combined, including Trump of course, was the Envy of the vast majority of other major countries that saw their inflation rates rise into double and triple digits with virtually no jobs recovery or creation in sight.
Blaming Trump's Pandemic Inflation on the incoming Biden Administration that was handed it and then recovered the world from it is perhaps the most ridiculous and oblivious of all ridiculous and obvious Repub MAGA concoctions. And that's saying a lot!
And, no, Trump did not grandly announce his and Melania's taking of the vaccine that Obama's original 7 years prior fast track vaccine and pandemic prevention program got done in near record time. He and Melania got vaccinated in near total secrecy, the report of it not coming out by what Trump falsely describes as "fake news" until long after they did it and hundreds of thousands of Americans had died for lack of taking it. And then Trump got booed by his rabid anti-vaccine Repub MAGA crowd that he had so deliberately and consistently indoctrinated into that position for daring to mention it might be a good idea to get vaccinated and he therefore never mentioned it again. He likely only did it that one too little too late time because he saw his Party's voters in deadbeat Red states dropping like flies from ongoing effects of his Trump's Pandemic virus.
[B]Donald Trump, Melania got COVID-19 vaccine in secret before leaving office.
March 2, 2021[/B]
[URL]https://globalnews.ca/news/7671671/donald-trump-coronavirus-vaccine-secret/[/URL]
[B]Trump got vaccinated in secret. Here's why this matters.
Dr. Peter Hotez says that if former President Donald Trump and former first lady Melania Trump had decided to reveal to the public that they received the Covid-19 vaccine it would have helped "melt away" a lot of vaccine hesitancy.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/videos/health/2021/03/02/donald-melania-trump-got-covid-19-vaccine-in-secret-hotez-sot-newday-sot-vpx.cnn[/URL]
[B]Trump booed at Alabama rally after telling supporters to get vaccinated.
"But I recommend take the vaccines," Trump said. "I did it. It's good. Take the vaccines."
Aug. 22, 2021[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-booed-alabama-rally-after-telling-supporters-get-vaccinated-n1277404[/URL]
[QUOTE]Covid cases and hospitalizations are surging in large parts of the South because of the highly contagious delta variant of the coronavirus. Cullman, where the rally was hosted, is experiencing a rise in cases that has matched its previous peak from late December. The city declared a Covid state of emergency Thursday to provide extra emergency support for the rally.
Alabama has the lowest vaccination rate in the U.S., with just more than 36 percent of its population having been fully inoculated, according to an NBC News tracker. Gov. Kay Ivey, a Republican, has said "the unvaccinated folks" are to blame for Covid's resurgence in the state.[/QUOTE]
-
Electrostate vs Petrostate: ChatGOP Links
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060653]From ChatGPT, here's South Australia's total energy consumption by source. I believe SA's share of consumption from renewables should be higher than other states based on what I recall you posting, but could be wrong. These numbers are adjusted for Victoria interconnects.
Liquid petroleum products 42% to 45%
Natural Gas 30% to 34%
Renewables (wind, solar, bioenergy) 14% to 18%
Coal 3% to 6%
Other 3% to 5%[/QUOTE]Don't care if you are "cut-and-pasting" for ChatGOP, because you can't think for yourself or your not smart enough to put aggregated data into your own words.
I want to see [B][u]the links[/B][ / you] to the data information.
BTW, that would be data, information and numbers the electrification on SA's electrical grid!
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Aussi's Grid +41% renwables, America only about 26%
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060721]Now Australia is the new shining star of what to be? LOL. You need to follow the news better.
[URL]https://ieefa.org/resources/its-time-australia-reduce-its-oil-demand[/URL] [/QUOTE]Not sure what that link and data is suppose to be conclusive data about, since I was never comparing Australia's (or China's) total fossil fuels consumption (China's emissions yes). But thanks, that was nice fossil fuel data about Australia. My post BTW, was referring to the mythical 'baseload' of the South Australian electrical grid.
Nice try, but not quite an "apples to apples" comparison!
Plus I couldn't help but notice the title to your link is [B]"It's time for Australia to reduce its oil demand".[/B] Which is what they are doing, a rate greater than that of [I]the U.S.[/I] However, unlike [I]U.S.,[/I] if you take a look at Australia's (or South Australia's) grid, it is way cleaner and more electrified with renewables than [I]the U.S.[/I] [URL]https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/01/13/australia-adds-7-gw-of-renewables-in-2025-stays-on-track-for-2030-target[/URL].
Not too mention that Australia, is further ahead of [I]the U.S.,[/I] on the hard to abate areas of industry, like mining. So feel free, to go sector by sector on those hard, to abate fossil fuel areas of industry if you like, in a separate post that does industries by a "head-to-head" and "apples-to-apples" comparison?
P.S. BTW, since your MAGA Fuhrer, blew up the Middle East / Gulf region, and the world woke up to double and triple higher fuel prices, and have began to look at transportation alternatives, since when is debating the merits of an "Electrostate vs. Petrostate", just nonsense? If it's just nonsense, feel free to ignore my posts. Which would be too bad, as I do miss your typical MAGA [B]"Gish Gallop"[/B] rebuttals, from time to time!
-
You have to be kidding
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3061049]Biden and the Dems had nothing to do with the Global Inflation that occurred during and in the wake of Trump's Pandemic. That 9. 1% momentary peak in the USA economy's rate of inflation under Biden while he was also recovering the millions of jobs Trump had wiped out and going on to create millions more than all three previous Repub presidents combined, including Trump of course, was the Envy of the vast majority of other major countries that saw their inflation rates rise into double and triple digits with virtually no jobs recovery or creation in sight.
Blaming Trump's Pandemic Inflation on the incoming Biden Administration that was handed it and then recovered the world from it is perhaps the most ridiculous and oblivious of all ridiculous and obvious Repub MAGA concoctions. And that's saying a lot!
And, no, Trump did not grandly announce his and Melania's taking of the vaccine that Obama's original 7 years prior fast track vaccine and pandemic prevention program got done in near record time. He and Melania got vaccinated in near total secrecy, the report of it not coming out by what Trump falsely describes as "fake news" until long after they did it and hundreds of thousands of Americans had died for lack of taking it. And then Trump got booed by his rabid anti-vaccine Repub MAGA crowd that he had so deliberately and consistently indoctrinated into that position for daring to mention it might be a good idea to get vaccinated and he therefore never mentioned it again.[/QUOTE]You have to be kidding. Were you trying satire?
-
Job numbers soared in March
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3060971]Too old and senile Trump is used to play bad clown putting messe in everything, killing Americans and making lost jobs and inflation. I would not understand if he is not fired in November, after his lies about peace and many failures. A loser putting shame on USA. Go to play golf.[/QUOTE]Job numbers soared in March. Your misinformation is not holding up.
-
You want satire?
[QUOTE=Canada;3061203]You have to be kidding. Were you trying satire?[/QUOTE]What sane person posts online that suggests he sees himself as Jesus Christ? You can't make this up. He's attacking the Pope and sucking up to Putin who is helping Iran. How does that work?
-
I lived in NY and the Hamptons for 14 years. Mixed with both sides of the toxic political spectrum there.
I AM A Libertarian and in all honesty Trump maywwll be a massive duckhead but he gets shit done. Don't listen to his tirades or what he says just look at end results.
He did develop and build most of the Upper West Side when no one else could. Plus other stuff like the Central Park ice rink. Numerous midtown luxury condos etc.
As for Iran and Israel. Never met a Persian I didn't like and as I was married to a Jewish lass and half her cousins etc were Israeli can honestly say I don't like many Israelis that I have met.
Overall an arrogant, ignorant, aggressive nasty group as opposed to the lovely US based Jews I know.
Chalk and cheese they are.
As for Israel now. They have lost every single "mate" state on earth except the GOP mob in USA.
-
2 photos
Soared? LOL. Only compared to Trump and other GOP Presidents.
[QUOTE=Canada;3061204]Job numbers soared in March. Your misinformation is not holding up.[/QUOTE]"soaring" job numbers for Trump and most other Repub presidents can only be so compared to their own and other Repub presidents' disastrous economic policy results.
No, that's not satire. The real news source links I post to further substantiate a point I make really don't engage in satire in that way.
Now, in the case of Trump, so much as a single net gain job created by the end of his 2nd term vs the day he took office for this 2nd term could reasonably be described as "soaring" compared to the final number of jobs created by the end of his 1st term. Which was fewer than the number of jobs that existed in the USA economy when he first took office in January 2017. Shockingly, Trump is not the only Repub president of the past 100 years who has managed to do that. And a couple of other Repub presidents came pretty damn close to it, especially compared to the jobs creation record for Biden and every other Dem president of the past 100 years.
[B]Jobs report March 2026:[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/03/jobs-report-march-2026-.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
See included graph below.
See how tiny the March 2026 jobs number was compared to most months under Biden.
See Canada.
See Canada run.
Run, Canada, run.
-
3 photos
The crazy MAGA lies repeated by MAGA Bill Maher. Constantly.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060973]That is what gets me with the Dems. Trump was seen as an antidote to the Dems madness. DEI and a DEI presidential candidate, trans men in women's sports, white men being the root of all evil, out of control censorship, the idiotic lawfare, lying about Biden's mental state, and a rigged primary where the Democratic candidate was picked by the elites. It is important to remember how critical Democratic stupidity was in getting Trump elected.
Thing is Bill Maher warned the Dems. He said Trump was seen as the man who could defend America against all the crazies and Maher acknowledged it unlike other Dems. Thing is you got Tooms blasting Maher as a bothsider and Republicans which cracks me up. [B]Maher was correctly being critical of the Democrats as they were running off of a cliff.[/b]
I think once the Dems have an open primary season and do not rig it, they will get an electable candidate. Trump has gone way too far and alienated even his supporters. He is not working deals but flying off the handle impulsively. While I disagree in part with it, the image of Trump being Israel's beetch is going to bite the Republicans in the butt..[/QUOTE]A true fair and balanced Bothsider is fine. Cite Obama wearing a tan suit in the Oval Office every time you cite Trump leading his mob of cop-killing insurrectionists into bloody battle on American soil to overturn a free and fair election, overthrow American democracy and assassinate a few duly-elected officials along the way including his own Vice President if it makes you happy.
Slam Obama and Biden for not recovering America and the rest of the World from the existential economic Repub Disasters each of them inherited from outgoing Repub administrations fast enough, smoothly enough, perfectly neat, sweet and tidy enough every time you mention in passing that every Great Depression, Great Recession and Massive Jobs Destruction in the Millions of the past 100 years was produced and presided over by Repub Administrations in the first place if you must.
Fair enough.
But that isn't the way MAGA Bill Maher conducts his weekly MAGA Republican Party Election Campaign Rally.
No.
Here is some of the MAGA utter bullshit that MAGA Bill Maher repeats at his weekly Pro MAGA Repub "bothsider" rallies as examples of Drms "running off a cliff":
Dems don't know what a woman is.
Dems think a man can get pregnant.
Dems want to cut off your baby boy's dick and your baby girl's budding breasts.
Dems want everyone to go transgender.
Dems want to defund the police.
Dems want Open Borders.
Dems have no common sense.
Seriously? The one Party that has recovered America and the rest of the World from every Great Repub Depression, Great Repub Recession and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction of the past 100 years and never once produced one of them is the epitome of Common Sense.
Additionally, MAGA BIll Maher has never met, seen or heard a Dem running for elected office, in a position to legislate or who has ever legislated who believes or pushed for any of those other MAGA Repub lies. Not one. Least of all Kamala Harris.
Anybody and especially Repub MAGA Liar MAGA Bill Maher who believes for one minute and repeatedly asserts that Kamala Harris lost the election by a swing of less than 0. 75 of a single percentage point from Dem to Repub among the Muslim voting demographic spread across the only three swing states that mattered because she actually believes or ran on such utter bullshit is nothing less than a Rabid Repub MAGA Cult Member and far from being a truly fair and balanced bothsider merely stating the data, evidence and facts about both Parties.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061194]
Not too mention that Australia, is further ahead of [I]the U.S.,[/I] on the hard to abate areas of industry, like mining.[/QUOTE]Tell that to the blokes down at the pub in Kalgoorlie or Mackay. You'll get a good laugh. Yes, increasingly mines use solar and wind for electricity when the sun shines or the wind blows. But energy at the mines is overwhelming supplied by fossil fuels, notably diesel but also natural gas.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061188]Don't care if you are "cut-and-pasting" for ChatGOP, because you can't think for yourself or your not smart enough to put aggregated data into your own words.
I want to see [B][u]the links[/B][/you] to the data information.
BTW, that would be data, information and numbers the electrification on SA's electrical grid![/QUOTE]No. You've been touting EV cars, as well as electric coal mining trucks, ad nauseum. And presumably you believe the electricity to charge the vehicles should come from renewables. So I will not provide you with "data, information and numbers" about the "electrification of SA's electrical grid" instead of data about SA's total energy consumption.
I shouldn't provide you with links period. I'm not your personal slave. If you see something I wrote that's wrong, correct it, like when you pointed out that baseload power in South Australia doesn't apply. But, ONE MORE TIME, here's a link for total energy consumption, from the official scorekeeper:
[URL]https://www.energy.gov.au/publications/australian-energy-update-2025[/URL]
Click on "Table C: Australian energy consumption by state and territory, by fuel, energy units. " Download the Excel file. Click into the worksheet "SA. " For 2023-2024, the latest available year, divide 50.5 petajoules (renewables) by 291.3 petajoules (total SA primary energy consumption) and you'll get 17.3%. Or you could just take my word for it.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3061271]A true fair and balanced Bothsider is fine. Cite Obama wearing a tan suit in the Oval Office every time you cite Trump leading his mob of cop-killing insurrectionists into bloody battle on American soil to overturn a free and fair election, overthrow American democracy and assassinate a few duly-elected officials along the way including his own Vice President if it makes you happy.
Slam Obama and Biden for not recovering America and the rest of the World from the existential economic Repub Disasters each of them inherited from outgoing Repub administrations fast enough, smoothly enough, perfectly neat, sweet and tidy enough every time you mention in passing that every Great Depression, Great Recession and Massive Jobs Destruction in the Millions of the past 100 years was produced and presided over by Repub Administrations in the first place if you must.
Fair enough.
But that isn't the way MAGA Bill Maher conducts his weekly MAGA Republican Party Election Campaign Rally.
No.
Here is some of the MAGA utter bullshit that MAGA Bill Maher repeats at his weekly Pro MAGA Repub "bothsider" rallies as examples of Drms "running off a cliff":
Dems don't know what a woman is.
Dems think a man can get pregnant.
Dems want to cut off your baby boy's dick and your baby girl's budding breasts.
Dems want everyone to go transgender.
Dems want to defund the police.
Dems want Open Borders.
Dems have no common sense.
Seriously? The one Party that has recovered America and the rest of the World from every Great Repub Depression, Great Repub Recession and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction of the past 100 years and never once produced one of them is the epitome of Common Sense.
Additionally, MAGA BIll Maher has never met, seen or heard a Dem running for elected office, in a position to legislate or who has ever legislated who believes or pushed for any of those other MAGA Repub lies. Not one. Least of all Kamala Harris.
Anybody and especially Repub MAGA Liar MAGA Bill Maher who believes for one minute and repeatedly asserts that Kamala Harris lost the election by a swing of less than 0. 75 of a single percentage point from Dem to Repub among the Muslim voting demographic spread across the only three swing states that mattered because she actually believes or ran on such utter bullshit is nothing less than a Rabid Repub MAGA Cult Member and far from being a truly fair and balanced bothsider merely stating the data, evidence and facts about both Parties.[/QUOTE]
MAGA Bill Maher, lol. Give us a break.
[QUOTE=Canada;3061203]You have to be kidding. Were you trying satire?[/QUOTE]That explains it! Tooms is closet MAGA! He's trying to rile up the MAGA base, piss them off, so they'll go to the polls.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3061049]Biden and the Dems had nothing to do with the Global Inflation that occurred during and in the wake of Trump's Pandemic. That 9. 1% momentary peak in the USA economy's rate of inflation under Biden while he was also recovering the millions of jobs Trump had wiped out and going on to create millions more than all three previous Repub presidents combined, including Trump of course, was the Envy of the vast majority of other major countries that saw their inflation rates rise into double and triple digits with virtually no jobs recovery or creation in sight.
Blaming Trump's Pandemic Inflation on the incoming Biden Administration that was handed it and then recovered the world from it is perhaps the most ridiculous and oblivious of all ridiculous and obvious Repub MAGA concoctions. And that's saying a lot!
And, no, Trump did not grandly announce his and Melania's taking of the vaccine that Obama's original 7 years prior fast track vaccine and pandemic prevention program got done in near record time. He and Melania got vaccinated in near total secrecy, the report of it not coming out by what Trump falsely describes as "fake news" until long after they did it and hundreds of thousands of Americans had died for lack of taking it. And then Trump got booed by his rabid anti-vaccine Repub MAGA crowd that he had so deliberately and consistently indoctrinated into that position for daring to mention it might be a good idea to get vaccinated and he therefore never mentioned it again. He likely only did it that one too little too late time because he saw his Party's voters in deadbeat Red states dropping like flies from ongoing effects of his Trump's Pandemic virus.
[B]Donald Trump, Melania got COVID-19 vaccine in secret before leaving office.
March 2, 2021[/B]
[URL]https://globalnews.ca/news/7671671/donald-trump-coronavirus-vaccine-secret/[/URL]
[B]Trump got vaccinated in secret. Here's why this matters.
Dr. Peter Hotez says that if former President Donald Trump and former first lady Melania Trump had decided to reveal to the public that they received the Covid-19 vaccine it would have helped "melt away" a lot of vaccine hesitancy.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/videos/health/2021/03/02/donald-melania-trump-got-covid-19-vaccine-in-secret-hotez-sot-newday-sot-vpx.cnn[/URL]
[B]Trump booed at Alabama rally after telling supporters to get vaccinated.
"But I recommend take the vaccines," Trump said. "I did it. It's good. Take the vaccines."
Aug. 22, 2021[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-booed-alabama-rally-after-telling-supporters-get-vaccinated-n1277404[/URL][/QUOTE]From your first link: "Everyone should go get your shot," Trump said on Sunday. And, from your link, in December, 2020, he said "I am not scheduled to take the vaccine, but look forward to doing so at the appropriate time. ".
From your second link: ". I recommend take the vaccines. I did it. It's good. Take the vaccines. " When the crowd booed, ""No, that's OK. That's all right. You got your freedoms. But I happened to take the vaccine. If it doesn't work, you'll be the first to know. OK? I'll call up Alabama, I'll say, hey, you know what? But (the vaccine) is working. ".
Trump said the vaccine saved tens of millions of lives, more than once.
Please recall in the fall of 2020 that Biden and Harris expressed concerns about taking the vaccine, because presumably they thought Trump was rushing it through the approval process. Well, yeah, he was pushing it along. And as a result hundreds of thousands of lives were saved, versus what probably would have happened if Hillary Clinton had been president.
My guess as to the main reason Trump didn't make a public spectacle out of getting the vaccine was because he and Melania were jumping the queue. They both recently had COVID, and I believe the recommendation was to wait until some months after before getting the vaccine. Those shots, given very close to the end of Trump's term, should have gone to a person in his 80's or 90's, who had maybe a 10% to 20% chance of dying if he contracted COVID. Also Trump had other things on his mind at the time, like trying to steal an election. That said, I do believe he should have used the bully pulpit to try to persuade people to mask up, get vaccinated, etc., more than he did. As he said in one of your links, people should have the choice whether to take the vaccine. I just wish he'd worked harder to persuade older Americans in particular to make the right choice.
P.S. Who's changing the subject? You've taken us from blue state vs. red state funding of government to Trump's COVID vaccine in a round about way. That's fine with me, but Spidy doesn't approve, based on his recent admonishments.
-
3 photos
MAGA Bill Maher campaigns for Repub MAGAs by repeating MAGA lies about Dems.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061300]MAGA Bill Maher, lol. Give us a break.
That explains it! Tooms is closet MAGA! He's trying to rile up the MAGA base, piss them off, so they'll go to the polls.
From your first link: "Everyone should go get your shot," Trump said on Sunday. And, from your link, in December, 2020, he said "I am not scheduled to take the vaccine, but look forward to doing so at the appropriate time. ".
From your second link: ". I recommend take the vaccines. I did it. It's good. Take the vaccines. " When the crowd booed, ""No, that's OK. That's all right. You got your freedoms. But I happened to take the vaccine. If it doesn't work, you'll be the first to know. OK? I'll call up Alabama, I'll say, hey, you know what? But (the vaccine) is working. ".
Trump said the vaccine saved tens of millions of lives, more than once.
Please recall in the fall of 2020 that Biden and Harris expressed concerns about taking the vaccine, because presumably they thought Trump was rushing it through the approval process. Well, yeah, he was pushing it along. And as a result hundreds of thousands of lives were saved, versus what probably would have happened if Hillary Clinton had been president.
My guess as to the main reason Trump didn't make a public spectacle out of getting the vaccine was because he and Melania were jumping the queue. They both recently had COVID, and I believe the recommendation was to wait until some months after before getting the vaccine. Those shots, given very close to the end of Trump's term, should have gone to a person in his 80's or 90's, who had maybe a 10% to 20% chance of dying if he contracted COVID. .[/QUOTE]Yes, I know Trump said people should take the vaccine too little and too late and wasn't hiding it. You didn't need to uncover it in the link. I quoted it in black highlight in the headline of the report.
MAGA Bill Maher constantly repeats ridiculous and thoroughly debunked MAGA lies about Dems, some of which I cited previously, to make Dems sound utterly unfit to serve in any capacity even in the minds of the least informed voters who might not ever know anything about the consistent 100 year history of Great Repub Depressions, Great Repub Recessions and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction and thereby encourage the support of Repub MAGAs and help them win elections. Doing that while also pawning himself off as an "honest broker of the truth bothsider" does more work for Repub MAGA election hopes than Marjorie Taylor Greene and Alex Jones combined.
Meanwhile, I know MAGA Bill Maher knows that Trump is responsible for ushering in Trump's Pandemic more than any other person on the planet and therefore the millions of deaths, worldwide economic collapse, global hyper-inflation, business and school closures, etc that followed by defunding and removing the highly effective Pandemic Prevention and Response teams leadership from those Chinese labs in 2019 contrary to all expert warnings for him not to do something so dangerous and stupid, then even himself admitted in a March 20,2020 recorded interview that if only someone had been there to tell us about those earliest emerging cases "two months sooner, we could have prevented all the trouble and stopped it easily. "
MAGA Bill Maher has known that historic truth for 6 years, through 2 critically important elections in 2022 and 2024.
How do I know he knows it? Because I heard him say it to a guest on his YouTube blog show before the 2022 midterms. Once. Only once. If he ever mentioned it even once on his far more viewed weekly HBO Real Time and Repub MAGA Campaign Rally I did not catch it.
But you could have tuned into his HBO Repub MAGA Campaign Rally any week before the 2022 midterms and the 2024 presidential election and heard him passionately and seriously repeat that utter horseshit about Dems wanting to chop off your baby boy's dick and chop off your baby girl's budding breasts, how they want to defund the police, how Biden had "open borders", the Dems have no common sense, blah blah blah.
Did his weekly repetition of that utter horseshit for years to his supposedly predominantly "Dem audience" convince at least 114,900 of them spread across the only three swing states that mattered to stay home and not bother voting for Kamala Harris in 2024? No way to conclusively know for sure, not as surely as anyone can know the swing in the Muslim community of voters in those three swing states did it for Trump.
But it sure as hell is more likely to have been the reason a relative handful of Dem voters did that due to MAGA Bill Maher's weekly Dem-bashing screeds and lies than anything openly-admitted Repub MAGA hacks like Greene and Jones ever said.
BTW, here is exactly what Kamala Harris said before the election about taking the vaccine regardless whether Trump recommends it or not:
[URL]https://youtu.be/-dAjCeMuXR0?si=t0lVOX31zJ3UVBRT[/URL]
If Hillary Clinton or any other Dem had been president there wouldn't have been a Covid-19 Pandemic because neither she nor any other Dem would have left the world bare-ass naked to preventing it or at least immediately intelligently responding to those earliest emerging cases in those Chinese labs in 2019. Trump defunded and removed the leadership of those highly effective teams from those Chinese labs precisely because it was a program that Obama and Clinton helped to set up when they were setting up the Fast Track Vaccine Development program that got the Trump's Pandemic vaccine invented and distributed so quickly.
The same reason Trump tore up the highly effective Iran Nuclear Deal that he himself twice confirmed was working as planned in 2017 right before he tore it up; it had Obama's "signature" on it.
-
The truth is the truth it doesn't need to be sugar coated
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3059865]You should read "How to Win Friends and Influence People," by Dale Carnegie.
McCain was a POW for over 5 years. When he ejected from his aircraft he broke both arms and a leg, and received little medical care. The NVA offered him early release because his father was an admiral and he told them to stuff it. He could have avoided torture and solitary confinement by giving propaganda statements. But he did not.
Now McCain did fuck up when he kicked off the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax by passing on the Steele dossier to James Comey. Recall that the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton Campaign funded said dossier. Still Trump had no reason to say what he did about McCain, "He's not a war hero. I like people who weren't captured. " That's rich coming from someone who used bone spurs to avoid getting drafted.
If you are as wrong about Tooms as you are about McCain, our man in Bangkok must be a true patriot. Sadly misguided, but a patriot none the less.[/QUOTE]Unlike you and Tokyo Rose spewing lies 24/7.
Or that mean girls vagina Elvis spreading unprovable rumors about Our Lord and Savior.
Just don't say anything about her ghetto ass Colombian puta novia or their trick baby (she will blow the mod to remove your comments that hurt her feelings).
I guess I'm what they call down there in Texas as a straight shooter.
I believe in Karma, John McCain hated Americans and was a traitor ala the Gang of 8 and the Keating 5, brain cancer was too kind to him.
Ben Sasse is a traitor and Karma is serving him up some sweet ass justice as well!
You mention you like JD Vance? I thought you hated him?
Do you now think he's owned by King POS Libertarian Elon?
My wish is for DJT for 8 more yrs.
DJT Jr 2028-2036 with Stephen Miller as VP then Stephen Miller 2036-2044.
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
-
Still 100% better than Biden or Obama
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3061212]What sane person posts online that suggests he sees himself as Jesus Christ? You can't make this up. He's attacking the Pope and sucking up to Putin who is helping Iran. How does that work?[/QUOTE]He is still 100% better than Biden or Obama so are really making Biden and Obama look bad.
-
Free speech in USA. This isn't Iran
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3061212]What sane person posts online that suggests he sees himself as Jesus Christ? You can't make this up. He's attacking the Pope and sucking up to Putin who is helping Iran. How does that work?[/QUOTE]There is free speech in America. You can say what you want in USA even if people don't agree with you. Are you against free speech now?
-
Biden only created DEI government jobs
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3061227]"soaring" job numbers for Trump and most other Repub presidents can only be so compared to their own and other Repub presidents' disastrous economic policy results.
No, that's not satire. The real news source links I post to further substantiate a point I make really don't engage in satire in that way.
Now, in the case of Trump, so much as a single net gain job created by the end of his 2nd term vs the day he took office for this 2nd term could reasonably be described as "soaring" compared to the final number of jobs created by the end of his 1st term. Which was fewer than the number of jobs that existed in the USA economy when he first took office in January 2017..[/QUOTE]Biden only created DEI government jobs. Trump is slowly getting rid of all the jobs Biden created and is creating real jobs in the private sector. Do your homework. Biden was a total failure. Everyone knows it. Even the democrats still in congress know it. He is blackballed by his own party. No Democrat wants Biden campaigning with him or endorsing them. Biden wasn't creating any economy or jobs. The auto pen did all his work. He is and was an embarrassment to the democrats.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3061385]There is free speech in America. You can say what you want in USA even if people don't agree with you. Are you against free speech now?[/QUOTE]I don t think USA are a real democracy under Trump, many and in his family telling he is now under dementia, telling white today and black tomorrow, just senile, when many lost jobs since 1 year and half and now inflation because of his lies and craziness.
-
3 photos
Uh
[QUOTE=Canada;3061388]Biden only created DEI government jobs. Trump is slowly getting rid of all the jobs Biden created and is creating real jobs in the private sector. Do your homework. Biden was a total failure. Everyone knows it. Even the democrats still in congress know it. He is blackballed by his own party. No Democrat wants Biden campaigning with him or endorsing them. Biden wasn't creating any economy or jobs. The auto pen did all his work. He is and was an embarrassment to the democrats.[/QUOTE]The USA Bureau of Labor Statistics that provided the numbers for that graph I posted showing jobs creation roaring and soaring under Biden way beyond that of Trump or any other Repub in the past 100 years or so knows the difference between government jobs and private payroll / private-sector jobs.
That graph was only about private payroll / private-sector jobs, not government jobs. And by golly I think I'll post it again below so you won't even need to go searching for it.
Here's the AI Overview for meaning of those terms. Your homework assignment is to study what it says so someday you might know the difference as well as a typical black female military veteran government employee does:
[QUOTE]USA BLS Private Payroll Jobs (Total Private Employment) is a key metric from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) tracking the monthly change in employees on non-farm, [b]private-sector business payrolls.[/b] It covers roughly 85% of total nonfarm employees (excluding government, farms, and non-profits) and is used to measure private-sector economic growth and hiring trends.
Bureau of Labor Statistics (.gov)
Bureau of Labor Statistics (.gov)[/QUOTE]
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3061388]Biden only created DEI government jobs. Trump is slowly getting rid of all the jobs Biden created and is creating real jobs in the private sector. Do your homework. Biden was a total failure. Everyone knows it. Even the democrats still in congress know it. He is blackballed by his own party. No Democrat wants Biden campaigning with him or endorsing them. Biden wasn't creating any economy or jobs. The auto pen did all his work. He is and was an embarrassment to the democrats.[/QUOTE]The homework has been done. Let's compare notes.
Biden created 16 million jobs over four years — the first administration in recorded history to add jobs every single month. Of those, 89% were private sector jobs according to PolitiFact, which rated the "DEI government jobs" claim false. The S&P 500 rose 57.8% during his term. Corporate profits hit record highs every single year.
The fair criticism is that roughly 72% of those jobs were pandemic recovery rather than new creation — a legitimate point. But that's a very different claim from "only DEI government jobs."
As for Trump "creating real jobs in the private sector" — current inflation is at 3. 3%, the highest since May 2024, driven by an Iran war his administration started and tariffs his own Supreme Court appointees ruled unconstitutional. The jobs picture going forward is worth watching closely.
"Everyone knows it" is not a data point. It's just a louder way of saying nothing.
-
Intervention for the Marquesa!
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3061378]Unlike you and Tokyo Rose spewing lies 24/7.
Or that mean girls vagina Elvis spreading unprovable rumors about Our Lord and Savior.
Just don't say anything about her ghetto ass Colombian puta novia or their trick baby (she will blow the mod to remove your comments that hurt her feelings).
I guess I'm what they call down there in Texas as a straight shooter.
I believe in Karma, John McCain hated Americans and was a traitor ala the Gang of 8 and the Keating 5, brain cancer was too kind to him.
Ben Sasse is a traitor and Karma is serving him up some sweet ass justice as well!
You mention you like JD Vance? I thought you hated him?
Do you now think he's owned by King POS Libertarian Elon?
My wish is for DJT for 8 more yrs.
DJT Jr 2028-2036 with Stephen Miller as VP then Stephen Miller 2036-2044.
[/QUOTE]From what I've seen, Elvis has treated you only with kindness and respect here. If he flew off the handle you must have provoked it. Also please don't refer to him with feminine pronouns. Not only does it make you look woke, but that was my idea, reserved only for you Marquesa. You look like a copycat.
You're a rare breed, a MAGA Socialist. The only other one I know of is Steve Bannon. You must reach out to others or you'll be all alone. I'll make it easy. Please buy this, read it, and implement it in your everyday life:
[URL]https://www.amazon.com/How-Win-Friends-Influence-People/dp/0671027034[/URL]
And what's the deal with people with cancer? Every time somebody comes down with cancer, like John McCain or Ben Sasse, you want him dead ASAP. Someone in your past, maybe a parent or other loved one, must have died from cancer. And that left you feeling abandoned and alone. You have to come to terms with that if you're ever going to be happy and fulfilled. The Church of Tiny is here to help. You only need to ask.
-
Oh really, like how?
[QUOTE=Canada;3061384]He is still 100% better than Biden or Obama so are really making Biden and Obama look bad.[/QUOTE]Obama and Joe Biden did not bed Qatar for a hand me down 20 year old plane that Trump is haven't the US taxpayers retrofit as Air Force One and gift to him when he leaves office? Who does that? How is Trump making Obama and Biden look bad? You lost me when you made that leap.
Why did we pay for JD Vance to campaign for Orban in Hungary? What happened with the war against government waste. How did Trump's "endorsement" work out for Orban? Like, Duterte ofbthe Philippines someone is going get a one way ticket to The Hague!
-
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3061378]Or that mean girls vagina Elvis spreading unprovable rumors about Our Lord and Savior.
Just don't say anything about her ghetto ass Colombian puta novia or their trick baby (she will blow the mod to remove your comments that hurt her feelings).[/QUOTE]You got this bug up your ass and out of the blue you mentioned how you would reject my woman if she were made available to you which she is not. I do not know why you did that. Maybe you got rejected by a woman, but why don't you follow that up with how you would not have Morgan Fairchild or Marilyn Monroe as a GF because you do not like blondes?
Your reason for your "rejection" of my gal was that you do not like Colombians and then you posted you liked not blacks or Asians but Venezuelans! You cannot make up such stupid posts, but you went one better and started talking about your Colombian exploits. WTF is wrong with you?
Of course, you know nothing about her outside of what I have shared, and the only reason for your comment is because I have her, and you desperately want to think that you are better than me. That is pure, unadulterated narcissism. You and Trump have that in common!
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3061378]I guess I'm what they call down there in Texas as a straight shooter.[/QUOTE]Ha! I repeat that you know nothing about my woman or her kid. You are a complete bullshit artist or as we would say in Texas, "All hat and no cattle".
And I didn't contact the mod to delete your envious and pointless posts. The mod did that on his own. In your screwed up head, you believe that the only person who could find your posts stupid and pointless was me.
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;3061378]Do you now think he's owned by King POS Libertarian Elon?
My wish is for DJT for 8 more yrs.
DJT Jr 2028-2036 with Stephen Miller as VP then Stephen Miller 2036-2044.
[/QUOTE]Yeah, well, that says a lot about you. Trump has been out of hand with his impulsiveness, and he is hurting a lot of people because of it. That you are ignorant of the harm he has done speaks volumes about why you really like him. It is not his policies but your desire to be him that is driving you lack of sensitivity to the pain of others.
-
[blue][Deleted by Admin][/blue]
[b][u]EDITOR'S NOTE[/u]:[/b] [blue]This report was deleted because it contributed nothing of value and in fact constituted a complete waste of bandwidth.
The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange if information between men on the subject of finding women for sex. Let's stick to the subject.[/blue]
-
Total Consumption is meanless with context
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061294]No. You've been touting EV cars, as well as electric coal mining trucks, ad nauseum. And presumably you believe the electricity to charge the vehicles should come from renewables. So I will not provide you with "data, information and numbers" about the "electrification of SA's electrical grid" instead of data about SA's total energy consumption.[/QUOTE]Meaningless!
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061294]I shouldn't provide you with links period. I'm not your personal slave. If you see something I wrote that's wrong, correct it, like when you pointed out that baseload power in South Australia doesn't apply. But, ONE MORE TIME, here's a link for total energy consumption, from the official scorekeeper:
[URL]https://www.energy.gov.au/publications/australian-energy-update-2025[/URL] [/QUOTE]Again, meaningless! Try using consumption per capita, that has any real meaning. [URL]https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/energy-consumption-by-country[/URL].
I hate to break it to you BTW, but Australia's AEOM doesn't believe they have "baseload" power in SA.
And get back to me when you realize that the Australia's grid is at +41% renewables and America's is only at 26%, regardless of total consumption. The grid comparisons remain intact.
-
What now? My ChatGOP posts don't need no stinkin' links?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060653]From ChatGPT, here's South Australia's total energy consumption by source...[/QUOTE]Try taking your own advice, why don't you?
Oh BTW, so while you were doling out the typical obsequious and arrogant schooling of your fellow MAGA tribesman, Canada, when telling him:[LIST][I][b]"You just don't get how things work around here Canada. What you need to do is find a link to the Guardian or the New York Times or ProPublica...",[/b][/I] [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3060182&viewfull=1#post3060182[/URL][/LIST]It would seem, you forgot your own golden rule and didn't tell your "cut-and-paste" ChatGOP, [U]to provide the link,[/U] from whatever MAGA right-wing publication it used.
So before you go telling others, [U]to provide a link,[/U] perhaps try following your own advice and "golden rules" and provide a link, with your so called [I]"Courtesy of ChatGOP"[/I] info and posts? Or are you above following your own advice?
-
Don't believe it
[QUOTE=FutureDeadGuy;3061460]The homework has been done. Let's compare notes.
Biden created 16 million jobs over four years the first administration in recorded history to add jobs every single month. Of those, 89% were private sector jobs according to PolitiFact, which rated the "DEI government jobs" claim false. The S&P 500 rose 57.8% during his term. Corporate profits hit record highs every single year.
The fair criticism is that roughly 72% of those jobs were pandemic recovery rather than new creation a legitimate point. But that's a very different claim from "only DEI government jobs."
As for Trump "creating real jobs in the private sector" current inflation is at 3. 3%, the highest since May 2024, driven by an Iran war his administration started and tariffs his own Supreme Court appointees ruled unconstitutional. The jobs picture going forward is worth watching closely..[/QUOTE]I don't believe it. Show me proof because everything I Google proves you wrong. Inflation is not 3.3 %. He did not create 16 million jobs. Only jobs he created were far too many DEI government jobs that need to be phased out. Most of the jobs added were people returning to their jobs after Covid. Not sure why you keep making false statements about Biden presidency. Everyone in the USA experienced it. It was a disaster. Obviously you were not living in USA or you would have seen it every day. See link.
[URL]https://budget.house.gov/press-release/fact-check-biden-misleads-on-job-creation-statistics[/URL]
-
Wrong again
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3061459]The USA Bureau of Labor Statistics that provided the numbers for that graph I posted showing jobs creation roaring and soaring under Biden way beyond that of Trump or any other Repub in the past 100 years or so knows the difference between government jobs and private payroll / private-sector jobs.
That graph was only about private payroll / private-sector jobs, not government jobs. And by golly I think I'll post it again below so you won't even need to go searching for it.
Here's the AI Overview for meaning of those terms. Your homework assignment is to study what it says so someday you might know the difference as well as a typical black female military veteran government employee does:[/QUOTE][URL]
https://budget.house.gov/press-release/fact-check-biden-misleads-on-job-creation-statistics[/URL]
-
Show me jobs losts
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3061448]I don t think USA are a real democracy under Trump, many and in his family telling he is now under dementia, telling white today and black tomorrow, just senile, when many lost jobs since 1 year and half and now inflation because of his lies and craziness.[/QUOTE]Show me the jobs lost under Trump. You can't because the economy is booming and companies are hiring record number of employees. Only jobs lost are in New York, CA and Illinois. Jobs moving to Texas, Florida, Tennessee. All because of woke liberal and socialist crap.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3060028]6 weeks ago gas was $2.00 to $2.20 a gallon in Wyoming, Oklahoma and Arizona. I filled up in Arizona at $2.20. Oklahoma had some stations at $1.99. It was on the national news as cheapest gas in USA. CA was averaging $4.89 at the same period so double. CA is usually $2. 00 above USA average. Canada was about $4.00 a gallon.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060182]You just don't get how things work around here Canada. What you need to do is find a link to the Guardian or the New York Times or ProPublica that says the price of gasoline was $2.20 in Arizona and $1.99 in Oklahoma. Until you do that nobody around here is going to take you seriously.[/QUOTE]Canada, My reply to your post WAS satire, directed at the usual suspects, not at you. Obviously the Guardian, New York Times, and ProPublica are not going to provide gasoline prices in Wyoming or Oklahoma from 6 weeks ago.
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061496]Try taking your own advice, why don't you?
Oh BTW, so while you were doling out the typical obsequious and arrogant schooling of your fellow MAGA tribesman, Canada, when telling him:[LIST][I][b]"You just don't get how things work around here Canada. What you need to do is find a link to the Guardian or the New York Times or ProPublica...",[/b][/I] [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3060182&viewfull=1#post3060182[/URL][/LIST]It would seem, you forgot your own golden rule and didn't tell your "cut-and-paste" ChatGOP, [U]to provide the link,[/U] from whatever MAGA right-wing publication it used.
So before you go telling others, [U]to provide a link,[/U] perhaps try following your own advice and "golden rules" and provide a link, with your so called [I]"Courtesy of ChatGOP"[/I] info and posts? Or are you above following your own advice?[/QUOTE]I can't recall ever asking for a link from anyone here, except of course from Canada.
-
Hahahahaha!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061495]
I hate to break it to you BTW, but Australia's AEOM doesn't believe they have "baseload" power in SA.[/QUOTE]
I hate to break it to you BTW, but I already conceded that:
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;3061294]I shouldn't provide you with links period. I'm not your personal slave.[b] If you see something I wrote that's wrong, correct it, like when you pointed out that baseload power in South Australia doesn't apply.[/b][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061495]Again, meaningless! Try using consumption per capita, that has any real meaning. [URL]https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/energy-consumption-by-country...[/URL].
And get back to me when you realize that the Australia's grid is at +41% renewables and America's is only at 26%, regardless of total consumption. The grid comparisons remain intact.[/QUOTE]Hilarious! Your link shows per capita energy consumption for the USA at 265.85 GJ and for Australia at 204.77 GJ.
However, Australia's the 15th biggest per capita emitter of CO2, at 14.21 tons, compared to 13.83 tons for the USA:
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions_per_capita[/URL]
In other words, per capita, the USA consumes more energy but emits less CO2 than Australia. Why? I bet it's because of natural gas in the USA! I suspect if Australian had devoted 10% of the resources to gas pipelines as it devoted to renewables, its CO2 emissions would be a lot lower. Australia has huge deposits of natural gas offshore Western Australia and the Northern Territory, but no way to get it to the big cities in the southeast. So, in addition to renewables, it relies on coal, which emits more CO2 per BTU than natural gas.
-
Wrong again
[QUOTE=FutureDeadGuy;3061460]The homework has been done. Let's compare notes.
Biden created 16 million jobs over four years the first administration in recorded history to add jobs every single month. Of those, 89% were private sector jobs according to PolitiFact, which rated the "DEI government jobs" claim false. The S&P 500 rose 57.8% during his term. Corporate profits hit record highs every single year.
The fair criticism is that roughly 72% of those jobs were pandemic recovery rather than new creation a legitimate point. But that's a very different claim from "only DEI government jobs."
As for Trump "creating real jobs in the private sector" current inflation is at 3. 3%, the highest since May 2024, driven by an Iran war his administration started and tariffs his own Supreme Court appointees ruled unconstitutional. The jobs picture going forward is worth watching closely.
"Everyone knows it" is not a data point. It's just a louder way of saying nothing.[/QUOTE][URL]https://budget.house.gov/press-release/fact-check-biden-misleads-on-job-creation-statistics[/URL]
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Why decarbonization of the grid is a better comparison
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061520]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ons_per_capita
In other words, per capita, the USA consumes more energy but emits less CO2 than Australia[/QUOTE]LOL! Barely, as [I]the U.S.[/I] is like 16th, right after Australia at 15th. So big deal, not really much of a difference.
Once again, my posts are being dropped by Admin, so I'll post again the comparison of energy consumption and CO2, I originally was trying to make between the USA and China.
[B]Dropped Post:[/B]
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060653]From ChatGPT, here's South Australia's total energy consumption by source...[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060721]Now Australia is the new shining star of what to be? LOL. You need to follow the news better.
[URL]https://ieefa.org/resources/its-time-australia-reduce-its-oil-demand[/URL] [/QUOTE]BTW, just presenting a country's energy (or prime energy) consumption, is pretty meaningless, on it own. A country's energy consumption, is more meaningful, when you look at the consumption / CO2 per capita, [URL]https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/energy-consumption-by-country[/URL] and [URL]https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-per-capita/[/URL] (as of 2024). The [I]U.S. a country 4x[/I] smaller than China (by population), for example, has an energy consumption per capita of [I]about 2.3x larger[/I].
[B]End of Dropped Post:[/B]
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061520]In other words, per capita, the [b][u]USA consumes more energy but emits less CO2[/u][/b] than Australia. Why? I bet it's because of natural gas in the USA![/QUOTE]But allow me to add some sanitary reasoning, to your last post, since you still seem to think, total energy is somehow meaningful, without the proper context.
Using your own asinine and misplaced logic, does that mean, that when China emits more energy, but emits less CO2 (27th), than [I]the U.S. (16th),[/I] that it is because of the tons of dirty "beautiful clean coal" being burnt in China? [I]This is the absurdity of your logic...Duh![/I].
This is AGAIN, why I choose to use, a comparison of electricity grids for a proper decarbonization comparison. [URL]https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/01/13/australia-adds-7-gw-of-renewables-in-2025-stays-on-track-for-2030-target[/URL].
-
Canada holds no love or votes, for the right-wing Poilievre Conservatives
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3060889]Canadian Liberal aka Trudeau lover. Unless you're saying Huacho is a socialist in which case I take that back.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Canada;3059559]I am Canadian. Biden tried to destroy USA and Trudeau virtually destroyed Canada.[/QUOTE]LOL! Looks like Canadians, love their ex-Trudeau Liberal government, just fine, as Canada's ex-Trudeau government, newly reincarnated under PM Mark Carney [I](more than 1-year now, for those still lamenting the bygone days of Trudeau),[/I] just won a majority, with 3-seats crossing the floor, showing their distrust and disgust with Canada's Conservative leadership.
[B]Mark Carneys party secures majority government after sweeping to victory in three special elections,[/B] April 14,2026. [URL]https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/canada-special-election-mark-carney-liberals-majority-b2957055.html[/URL]
Naturally, leaving nothing but shame, frustration and disillusionment on the faces of the right-wing Conservatives, woefully led by the ineffective weakass, Pierre Poilievre.
-
Who says any of the millions of jobs Trump wiped out would be recovered?
[QUOTE=FutureDeadGuy;3061460]The homework has been done. Let's compare notes.
Biden created 16 million jobs over four years the first administration in recorded history to add jobs every single month. Of those, 89% were private sector jobs according to PolitiFact, which rated the "DEI government jobs" claim false. The S&P 500 rose 57.8% during his term. Corporate profits hit record highs every single year.
The fair criticism is that roughly 72% of those jobs were pandemic recovery rather than new creation a legitimate point. But that's a very different claim from "only DEI government jobs."
As for Trump "creating real jobs in the private sector" current inflation is at 3. 3%, the highest since May 2024, driven by an Iran war his administration started and tariffs his own Supreme Court appointees ruled unconstitutional. The jobs picture going forward is worth watching closely..[/QUOTE]Every Great Repub Depression, Great Repub Recession and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction of the past 100 years, meaning all of the ones that have happened in the past 100 years, lost jobs most of which would be recovered during the Great Dem Recovery that followed.
I don't see that as any criticism even worth mentioning regarding a Great Repub Economic Disaster followed by a Great Dem Recovery but rather just artfully-worded BS crafted by someone in the media trying to "both side" these historic events into the usual elevating of Repub disasters and downplaying of Dem accomplishments.
Of course millions of the jobs that existed before any Great Repub Economic Disaster would be recovered when somebody comes along to clean up the colossal mess they left behind. And those somebodies are always the incoming Dems.
It isn't as though Trump and other Repubs wipe out millions of jobs and shut down hundreds of thousands of American businesses and the incoming Dems are then supposed to invent all new businesses with totally different jobs for the millions of unemployed Americans to apply for. LOL. How in the world is that supposed to happen?
The vast majority of the same industries, buildings, warehouses, factories and workplaces that existed before to manufacture goods and provide services for which there was popular demand and money to pay for them before Repub policies and stewardship crippled and collapsed them and wiped out all the jobs would still exist on January 21 the day after the incoming Dem gets inaugurated.
Those are still the jobs that were "lost" in the downturn by Repubs and then "gained" in the recovery by Dems.
There is no Economic Law of Gravity that ensures millions of jobs lost by one administration will automatically rise again the next year no matter who is president or what they do. That sure as hell isn't what happened in the first, second, third and almost another half year under Repub Herbert Hoover after the Great Repub Crash of 1929 and Great Repub Depression.
If you want to Recover all the jobs and create more jobs after one of those many Great Repub Economic Disasters you can't just sit around or go play golf until that imaginary Economic Law of Gravity brings everything back as it was before unless you are prepared to wait several years while the Disaster gets a lot worse and any possible Recovery, if any, becomes an even greater challenge.
For that you need a Dem administration to come charging in ASAP to do what only they have done for the past 100 years. As Obama and Biden did.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3061385]There is free speech in America. You can say what you want in USA even if people don't agree with you. Are you against free speech now?[/QUOTE]What complete BS. Try criticizing Israel. No, not Jews. The state of Israel. See where that gets you in America.
-
Canada / California
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061543]LOL! Looks like Canadians, love their ex-Trudeau Liberal government, just fine, as Canada's ex-Trudeau government, newly reincarnated under PM Mark Carney [I](more than 1-year now, for those still lamenting the bygone days of Trudeau),[/I] just won a majority, with 3-seats crossing the floor, showing their distrust and disgust with Canada's Conservative leadership.
[B]Mark Carneys party secures majority government after sweeping to victory in three special elections,[/B] April 14,2026. [URL]https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/canada-special-election-mark-carney-liberals-majority-b2957055.html[/URL]
Naturally, leaving nothing but shame, frustration and disillusionment on the faces of the right-wing Conservatives, woefully led by the ineffective weakass, Pierre Poilievre.[/QUOTE]Unfortunately Canada is like California. The big cities vote in the political parties. The western states don't have enough people to change a crooked government just like rural CA gets screwed. Luckily USA has Trump but unfortunately we can't get a Trump in Canada unless we separate from Canada. But not enough votes for that either.
-
Great Republican depression
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3061559]Every Great Repub Depression, Great Repub Recession and Massive Repub Jobs Destruction of the past 100 years, meaning all of the ones that have happened in the past 100 years, lost jobs most of which would be recovered during the Great Dem Recovery that followed.
I don't see that as any criticism even worth mentioning regarding a Great Repub Economic Disaster followed by a Great Dem Recovery but rather just artfully-worded BS crafted by someone in the media trying to "both side" these historic events into the usual elevating of Repub disasters and downplaying of Dem accomplishments.
Of course millions of the jobs that existed before any Great Repub Economic Disaster would be recovered when somebody comes along to clean up the colossal mess they left behind. And those somebodies are always the incoming Dems.
It isn't as though Trump and other Repubs wipe out millions of jobs and shut down hundreds of thousands of American businesses and the incoming Dems are then supposed to invent all new businesses with totally different jobs for the millions of unemployed Americans to apply for. LOL. How in the world is that supposed to happen?.[/QUOTE]Americans love the great Republican depression we are in now. Job numbers are up, leaves are up, inflation is 70% less than Biden trainwreck, stock market has hit record after record. I hope this Republican recession never ends as it is 300% better than the Biden years.
Are you American? Doesn't sound like it. From your posts you are not only anti Trump but anti American also. You are against everything that makes America great. You support Open borders, men playing women sports, drug traffickers, terrorist and Iran just because Trump is against these things.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061543]LOL! Looks like Canadians, love their ex-Trudeau Liberal government, just fine, as Canada's ex-Trudeau government, newly reincarnated under PM Mark Carney [I](more than 1-year now, for those still lamenting the bygone days of Trudeau),[/I] just won a majority, with 3-seats crossing the floor, showing their distrust and disgust with Canada's Conservative leadership.
[B]Mark Carneys party secures majority government after sweeping to victory in three special elections,[/B] April 14,2026. [URL]https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/canada-special-election-mark-carney-liberals-majority-b2957055.html[/URL]
Naturally, leaving nothing but shame, frustration and disillusionment on the faces of the right-wing Conservatives, woefully led by the ineffective weakass, Pierre Poilievre.[/QUOTE]Canada said he's an Albertan. The last time the leftist NDP controlled the Alberta government, from 2015 to 2019, GDP in 2007 dollars fell from 330 billion CAD to 306 billion in 2016, before rebounding to 325 billion at the end of their time in office. In other words, over a 4 year period, GDP didn't grow. The number of unemployed grew from 117,000 in April, 2015 to 238,000 in October, 2016, before declining to 140,000 in April, 2019 when the NDP lost control. So there were 23,000 more people unemployed at the end of their time in power than there were when they started.
Alberta suffered a one-two punch. Not only did it suffer through leftist NDP leadership at the state level, but in November, 2015, Trudeau's Liberal Party took control at the federal level and has held it ever since.
Oil and gas prices were weak through this period, which hurt. But the NDP's and Liberal's anti-oil industry and high tax policies hurt too. Texas, another oil producing (and admittedly more economically diversified) jurisdiction, did nicely during that period under wise Republican governance at the state level, and at the local level in most of the oil producing areas.
Thankfully for Albertans, the United Conservative Party is back in power at the state level! And will be for a long time if Albertans remember their experience under the NDP.
-
McCain
Only a clueless and gutless idiot would call John McCain a hater of fellow Americans.
Only a gutless dweeb.
-
NDP / Liberals / Socialists
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061633]Canada said he's an Albertan. The last time the leftist NDP controlled the Alberta government, from 2015 to 2019, GDP in 2007 dollars fell from 330 billion CAD to 306 billion in 2016, before rebounding to 325 billion at the end of their time in office. In other words, over a 4 year period, GDP didn't grow. The number of unemployed grew from 117,000 in April, 2015 to 238,000 in October, 2016, before declining to 140,000 in April, 2019 when the NDP lost control. So there were 23,000 more people unemployed at the end of their time in power than there were when they started.
Alberta suffered a one-two punch. Not only did it suffer through leftist NDP leadership at the state level, but in November, 2015, Trudeau's Liberal Party took control at the federal level and has held it ever since.
Oil and gas prices were weak through this period, which hurt. But the NDP's and Liberal's anti-oil industry and high tax policies hurt too. Texas, another oil producing (and admittedly more economically diversified) jurisdiction, did nicely during that period under wise Republican governance at the state level, and at the local level in most of the oil producing areas..[/QUOTE]You are correct. There is no difference if NDP or liberals or Socialists are in power. Alberta gets screwed. Carney is a fool and is playing with fire with the tariffs. He needs to cut a deal with Trump by May 31 or tariffs will go on the 86% of Canada goods that are at zero now. Canada economy will completely tank if he thinks he can play hardball with Trump. Canada absolutely needs to export to USA as over 80% of exports go to USA.
-
4 photos
Amazingly Fact-Challenged
[QUOTE=Canada;3061627]Americans love the great Republican depression we are in now. Job numbers are up, leaves are up, inflation is 70% less than Biden trainwreck, stock market has hit record after record. I hope this Republican recession never ends as it is 300% better than the Biden years.
Are you American? Doesn't sound like it. From your posts you are not only anti Trump but anti American also. You are against everything that makes America great. You support Open borders, men playing women sports, drug traffickers, terrorist and Iran just because Trump is against these things.[/QUOTE]You might be the most Fact-Challenged MAGA in North America.
Americans disapprove of the job Trump has done at record or near record levels for any president in history at this stage of his so-called presidency. See the demonstrably pro-Trump RealClearPolitics' poll of polls rates for him below.
Trump's job numbers are pathetic. Almost as bad already as they were at the end of his first disastrous term:
[B]Jobs Growth Under Trump Even More Dismal Than Originally Thought.[/B]
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jobs-growth-under-trump-even-180031639.html[/URL]
And let's take a little stroll down Memory Lane:
[B]Trump to leave office with the worst jobs record since Herbert Hoover.[/B]
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-leave-office-worst-jobs-030044152.html[/URL]
Leaves? Not sure what that means. Maybe a typo.
The Rate of Inflation is higher today under Trump than it was at the end of 2024 under Biden:
[B]Here's the inflation breakdown for December 2024 in one chart.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/15/heres-the-inflation-breakdown-for-december-2024-in-one-chart.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The bureaus consumer price index, an inflation gauge, rose [b]2.9% [/b]during the month versus the prior year.[/QUOTE][B]CPI inflation report March 2026: Consumer prices rose 3. 3%.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/10/cpi-inflation-report-march-2026.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The consumer price index increased a seasonally adjusted 0.9% in March putting the annual inflation rate at [b]3.3%.[/b][/QUOTE]The USA Stock Market as measured by either the S&P 500 Index or the Dow shows that the huge lion's share of gains it has seen in the past 4 years happened under Biden. See the screenshots below. Trump's contribution to it has been those two deep downward plunges in it since he took office and began implementing his typically disastrous Repub policies and management. Either Index has only seen a gain of about 12-15% over the past year and a half. Which is at or below the ordinary annual average gain for each over the past several decades even if a Repub president and his Repub Congress do nothing.
Seriously. It is astonishing that you have somehow managed to get everything wrong about everything every time. How do you do it? It must require constant practice and intense determination not to inadvertently stumble into something factually and provably true or at least vaguely true every now and then. And you have done it! That is impressive.
Please do more. It is an amazing thing to behold.
-
Electrotech saves trucking firms, ten of millions in diesel fuel: Janaus (Pt. 1)
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3060721]Now Australia is the [b]new shining star[/b] of what to be? LOL. You need to follow the news better.
[URL]https://ieefa.org/resources/its-time-australia-reduce-its-oil-demand[/URL] [/QUOTE]Really, I [I]"...need to follow the news better".[/I] Sure, okay why not! Let's see what the Aussie's are doing and why [B]"It's time for Australia to reduce its oil demand",[/B] as pointed out in your article?
So allow me to share the news I've been following "better", with a couple of examples, of Australian electrotech [I]"new shining star"[/I] solutions, that are electrifying the Australian economy, industry and grid, one success story at a time.
[B]Australia's World Leading Electrotech?:[/B]
[LIST]Take the fast raising success of Janaus Electric, an Australian grass-roots company, that has taken on, the real-world transformation of Australia's heavy transport sector, by converting old and existing fossil fuel diesel trucks, [b]into zero-emission vehicles,[/b] using innovative, swappable battery technology.
When you can convert a Qubes 165-tonne, diesel, triple road trains, to battery power, means you get approval by California Air Resources Board's (CARB) HVIP program, a crucial step for its US market entry. Plus contracts in Sub-Sarahan Africa with Avon in 2026. In 2023, CEO, Lex Forsyth says that a two-year payback is possible, if youre doing 180,000 - 200,000 km per year, just in diesel and maintenance costs.[url]https://bigrigs.com.au/2023/06/08/brisbane-to-sydney-electric-truck-highway-on-track-to-be-running-by-christmas/[/url][/LIST][LIST]See Pt.2, for Fortescue's $400 million savings in Mining Trucks Transformation.[/LIST][B]Meanwhile back in Trumpland Petrostate U.S., mass trucking Bankruptcies:[/B].
The list of major USA Trucking companies that closed or filed for bankruptcy in 2025 has experienced a severe "purge" of capacity, often referred to as the [I][b]"Great Freight Recession,"[/b][/I] characterized by high-profile bankruptcies and thousands of smaller carrier closures.
As of early 2025, an estimated 1,000 to 1,500 carriers were shutting down per week, with one month seeing over 7,000 operators exit the market, marking the highest rate of failure in over a year, with another wave MAGA Fuhrer inspired high cost of diesel wave to come in 2026. [URL]https://magazine.factoring.org/magazine-articles/carrier-amp-broker-failures-in-20242025-and-why-2026-may-bring-one-last-wave#footnotes[/URL]
-
Electrotech saves mining firm $400 million in diesel fuel: Fortescue (Pt. 2)
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061294]No. You've been touting EV cars, as well as electric coal mining trucks, ad nauseum. And presumably you believe the electricity to charge the vehicles should come from renewables. So I will not provide you with "data, information and numbers" about the "electrification of SA's electrical grid" instead of data about SA's total energy consumption.[/QUOTE]Hey no worries, as I was meaning to circle-back with regards to providing some great electrification examples and now is as good a time as any, to start up again, with Australia showing some of the world's leading examples of electrification, with regards to the hard to abate fossil fuel sectors and industries. See Pt. 1 for Janaus's Trucking EV solutions.
[B]Fortescue Ltd mining, looks to save $400 million in diesel fuel OpEx:[/B]
Like most companies, looking to save on OpEx costs wherever they can, more and more are realizing the simple truth (especially with a lunatic with the red MAGA cap sitting in the WH at 1600 PA Ave, who dumbfoundedly closed the Strait of Hormuz, causing diesel prices to skyrocket), are converting and electrifying their trucking and mining fleets, to save millions in OpEx.
Take Fortescue Ltd of Australia (4th-largest iron ore producer in the world), that will be eliminating about [U]450 million liters of annual diesel consumption,[/U] as the result of a massive, multi-pronged electrification strategy, and save upwards of [B][i]US$400 million dollars in savings,[/i][/B] from replacing fossil fuel diesel-powered haul trucks and excavators with electric alternatives, coupled with the company's own renewable energy generation of [I]S+W+B,[/I] as they now make their own natural clean fuel, on site.
Fortescue signed a $2. 8 billion partnership with Liebherr (German-Swiss) and XCMG (Chinese) for 360 electric trucks and additional smaller electric mining equipment. The initiative, powered by a partnership with Liebherr and XCMG, involves hundreds of 240-tonne electric autonomous trucks. [URL]https://electrek.co/2025/09/12/electric-haul-trucks-could-save-fortescue-over-400-million-in-fuel-per-year[/URL] (Sep 12th, 2025) AND [URL]https://thedriven.io/2026/02/04/fortescue-to-take-delivery-of-first-massive-battery-electric-trucks-from-china-supplier/[/URL] (April 8th, 2026).
[I]Boyah!...Now guess what?[/I] Other mining companies are sitting up and taking notice.
So while many MAGA suckers, love to quote all these "culture war" nonsense about renewables being a climate change hoax, the adults in the room, realize [I][b]"...it's just good, smart business economics"[/b][/I]. But not so much with the trucking bankruptcies, [I]in the U.S...uh?[/I]
Which leaves me to ask Elvis 2008 and Tiny 12, so what's the new "culture war" argument to be, against ex-fossil fueled, ex-diesel trucking and mining companies, saving tens and hundreds of millions, by converting to electrified zero-emission EV trucking and mining, outlined in Pt. 1 and Pt. 2? Oh, I can't wait to hear this!
-
Hahahahahahaha!
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061495]Meaningless!
Again, meaningless! Try using consumption per capita, that has any real meaning. [URL]https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/energy-consumption-by-country[/URL].
I hate to break it to you BTW, but Australia's AEOM doesn't believe they have "baseload" power in SA.
And get back to me when you realize that the Australia's grid is at +41% renewables and America's is only at 26%, regardless of total consumption. The grid comparisons remain intact.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061520]I hate to break it to you BTW, but I already conceded that:
Hilarious! Your link shows per capita energy consumption for the USA at 265.85 GJ and for Australia at 204.77 GJ.
However, Australia's the 15th biggest per capita emitter of CO2, at 14.21 tons, compared to 13.83 tons for the USA:
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions_per_capita[/URL]
In other words, per capita, the USA consumes more energy but emits less CO2 than Australia. Why? I bet it's because of natural gas in the USA! I suspect if Australian had devoted 10% of the resources to gas pipelines as it devoted to renewables, its CO2 emissions would be a lot lower. Australia has huge deposits of natural gas offshore Western Australia and the Northern Territory, but no way to get it to the big cities in the southeast. So, in addition to renewables, it relies on coal, which emits more CO2 per BTU than natural gas.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061540]LOL! Barely, as [I]the U.S.[/I] is like 16th, right after Australia at 15th. So big deal, not really much of a difference.
Once again, my posts are being dropped by Admin, so I'll post again the comparison of energy consumption and CO2, I originally was trying to make between the USA and China.
[B]Dropped Post:[/B]
BTW, just presenting a country's energy (or prime energy) consumption, is pretty meaningless, on it own. A country's energy consumption, is more meaningful, when you look at the consumption / CO2 per capita, [URL]https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/energy-consumption-by-country[/URL] and [URL]https://www.worldometers.info/co2-emissions/co2-emissions-per-capita/[/URL] (as of 2024). The [I]U.S. a country 4x[/I] smaller than China (by population), for example, has an energy consumption per capita of [I]about 2.3x larger[/I].
[B]End of Dropped Post:[/B]
But allow me to add some sanitary reasoning, to your last post, since you still seem to think, total energy is somehow meaningful, without the proper context.
Using your own asinine and misplaced logic, does that mean, that when China emits more energy, but emits less CO2 (27th), than [I]the U.S. (16th),[/I] that it is because of the tons of dirty "beautiful clean coal" being burnt in China? [I]This is the absurdity of your logic...Duh![/I].
This is AGAIN, why I choose to use, a comparison of electricity grids for a proper decarbonization comparison. [URL]https://www.pv-magazine.com/2026/01/13/australia-adds-7-gw-of-renewables-in-2025-stays-on-track-for-2030-target[/URL].[/QUOTE]
From your Wikipedia and World Population Review links above, the [B]per capita[/B] carbon emissions per GJ energy consumed are as follows:
China: 9. 24 tons /111.94 GJ = 0.083 tons / GJ.
Australia: 14.21 tons /204.77 GJ = 0.069 tons / GJ.
USA: 13.83 tons /265.85 GJ = 0.052 tons / GJ.
China, the electrostate, emits the most carbon per GJ of energy consumed. The USA, the petrostate, emits the least.
GDP per capita and the energy consumed per capita are strongly correlated:
[url]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/energy-use-per-person-vs-gdp-per-capita[/url]
We have air conditioners, bigger houses and keep room temperatures at comfortable levels. We have a better quality of life because we consume more energy.
Earlier on I had you pegged as a rational greenie, more or less. You tried to persuade us with economic arguments, that a number of times were valid, as was your enthusiasm for Chinese EV's. You weren't saying the world's going to come to an end and oil and gas companies are evil.
Now I'm wondering though, whether you're a rational greenie. When you brag on China and Australia for their lower per capita energy consumption, it sounds like you believe countries should make their citizenry poorer and worse off, and that's the solution to climate change. Well, first of all, developing countries and China which account for the majority of CO2 emissions won't go along with that. And second, if you take that reasoning to the logical extreme, we go back to a hunter / gatherer and subsistence level farming society. And nobody wants that, except the most radical greenies.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061706]Hey no worries, as I was meaning to circle-back with regards to providing some great electrification examples and now is as good a time as any, to start up again, with Australia showing some of the world's leading examples of electrification, with regards to the hard to abate fossil fuel sectors and industries. See Pt. 1 for Janaus's Trucking EV solutions.
[B]Fortescue Ltd mining, looks to save $400 million in diesel fuel OpEx:[/B]
Like most companies, looking to save on OpEx costs wherever they can, more and more are realizing the simple truth (especially with a lunatic with the red MAGA cap sitting in the WH at 1600 PA Ave, who dumbfoundedly closed the Strait of Hormuz, causing diesel prices to skyrocket), are converting and electrifying their trucking and mining fleets, to save millions in OpEx.
Take Fortescue Ltd of Australia (4th-largest iron ore producer in the world), that will be eliminating about [U]450 million liters of annual diesel consumption,[/U] as the result of a massive, multi-pronged electrification strategy, and save upwards of [B][i]US$400 million dollars in savings,[/i][/B] from replacing fossil fuel diesel-powered haul trucks and excavators with electric alternatives, coupled with the company's own renewable energy generation of [I]S+W+B,[/I] as they now make their own natural clean fuel, on site.
Fortescue signed a $2. 8 billion partnership with Liebherr (German-Swiss) and XCMG (Chinese) for 360 electric trucks and additional smaller electric mining equipment. The initiative, powered by a partnership with Liebherr and XCMG, involves hundreds of 240-tonne electric autonomous trucks. [URL]https://electrek.co/2025/09/12/electric-haul-trucks-could-save-fortescue-over-400-million-in-fuel-per-year[/URL] (Sep 12th, 2025) AND [URL]https://thedriven.io/2026/02/04/fortescue-to-take-delivery-of-first-massive-battery-electric-trucks-from-china-supplier/[/URL] (April 8th, 2026).
[I]Boyah!...Now guess what?[/I] Other mining companies are sitting up and taking notice.
So while many MAGA suckers, love to quote all these "culture war" nonsense about renewables being a climate change hoax, the adults in the room, realize [I][b]"...it's just good, smart business economics"[/b][/I]. But not so much with the trucking bankruptcies, [I]in the U.S...uh?[/I]
Which leaves me to ask Elvis 2008 and Tiny 12, so what's the new "culture war" argument to be, against ex-fossil fueled, ex-diesel trucking and mining companies, saving tens and hundreds of millions, by converting to electrified zero-emission EV trucking and mining, outlined in Pt. 1 and Pt. 2? Oh, I can't wait to hear this![/QUOTE]Damn it Spidy, every time you've directed a post at me lately you've proved my point. In this instance, it's "You've been touting EV cars, as well as electric coal mining trucks, ad nauseum. And presumably you believe the electricity to charge the vehicles should come from renewables. So I will not provide you with "data, information and numbers" about the "electrification of SA's electrical grid" instead of data about SA's total energy consumption. ".
That's a great application for electric trucks. The Pilbara region of Australia, where Fortescue's mines are located, is very sunny and annual rainfall is very low. The trucks operate close to the mine, and so should be easy to recharge. You do have torrential downpours from time to time, but I'd guess you wouldn't want to have trucks hauling rock then anyway. I'm not sure about diesel-powered excavators, but they might shut them down too during heavy rains.
If Fortescue is buying trucks from China, and from your post it appears they are, and not paying high tariffs or other fees, it would be hard to see this not working.
That said they're hauling iron ore. And that iron ore will be shipped to China on ships that use heavy fuel oil. Then it will be used to make steel in a process that uses a lot of coal.
My wild guess is that over 50% of the large electric trucks used in mining today are for coal operations in China. Dirty, dirty coal.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;3060721]Now Australia is the new shining star of what to be? LOL. You need to follow the news better.
[URL]https://ieefa.org/resources/its-time-australia-reduce-its-oil-demand[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061705]Really, I [I]"...need to follow the news better".[/I] Sure, okay why not! Let's see what the Aussie's are doing and why [B]"It's time for Australia to reduce its oil demand",[/B] as pointed out in your article?
So allow me to share the news I've been following "better", with a couple of examples, of Australian electrotech [I]"new shining star"[/I] solutions, that are electrifying the Australian economy, industry and grid, one success story at a time.
[B]Australia's World Leading Electrotech?:[/B]
[LIST]Take the fast raising success of Janaus Electric, an Australian grass-roots company, that has taken on, the real-world transformation of Australia's heavy transport sector, by converting old and existing fossil fuel diesel trucks, [b]into zero-emission vehicles,[/b] using innovative, swappable battery technology.
When you can convert a Qubes 165-tonne, diesel, triple road trains, to battery power, means you get approval by California Air Resources Board's (CARB) HVIP program, a crucial step for its US market entry. Plus contracts in Sub-Sarahan Africa with Avon in 2026. In 2023, CEO, Lex Forsyth says that a two-year payback is possible, if youre doing 180,000 - 200,000 km per year, just in diesel and maintenance costs.[url]https://bigrigs.com.au/2023/06/08/brisbane-to-sydney-electric-truck-highway-on-track-to-be-running-by-christmas/[/url][/LIST][LIST]See Pt.2, for Fortescue's $400 million savings in Mining Trucks Transformation.[/LIST][B]Meanwhile back in Trumpland Petrostate U.S., mass trucking Bankruptcies:[/B].
The list of major USA Trucking companies that closed or filed for bankruptcy in 2025 has experienced a severe "purge" of capacity, often referred to as the [I][b]"Great Freight Recession,"[/b][/I] characterized by high-profile bankruptcies and thousands of smaller carrier closures.
As of early 2025, an estimated 1,000 to 1,500 carriers were shutting down per week, with one month seeing over 7,000 operators exit the market, marking the highest rate of failure in over a year, with another wave MAGA Fuhrer inspired high cost of diesel wave to come in 2026. [URL]https://magazine.factoring.org/magazine-articles/carrier-amp-broker-failures-in-20242025-and-why-2026-may-bring-one-last-wave#footnotes[/URL][/QUOTE]Elvis, I'll let you take this layup if you'd like. Practically, I don't think you can sell this one short, that is sell the shares and then buy them back later, so you make money if the share price goes down. It only has a market cap of $13 million USD, and Interactive Brokers shows no shares available to borrow. It's currently $0.155 AUD per share, on a split-adjusted basis down from a peak of $3539 in 2005. They must have been in another business back then, and later decided electric trucks were the flavor of the day. So no opportunity here.
-
Trump polling may be low but not as low as democrats right now
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3061664]You might be the most Fact-Challenged MAGA in North America.
Americans disapprove of the job Trump has done at record or near record levels for any president in history at this stage of his so-called presidency. See the demonstrably pro-Trump RealClearPolitics' poll of polls rates for him below.
Trump's job numbers are pathetic. Almost as bad already as they were at the end of his first disastrous term:
[B]Jobs Growth Under Trump Even More Dismal Than Originally Thought.[/B]
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jobs-growth-under-trump-even-180031639.html[/URL]
And let's take a little stroll down Memory Lane:
[B]Trump to leave office with the worst jobs record since Herbert Hoover.[/B]
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-leave-office-worst-jobs-030044152.html[/URL]
Leaves? Not sure what that means. Maybe a typo.
The Rate of Inflation is higher today under Trump than it was at the end of 2024 under Biden:.[/QUOTE]Trump ratings may be lower now for Trump but polls on Democrats are much lower than Trump. Just because Trump is for a strong USA doesn't mean you have to be anti American. You can cheer for USA and Trump rather than Hamas, Iran and the rest of the terrorists. USA economy is very strong and experts in business can see it in the confidence of the markets. Only a fool can't see a strong America now.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061706]Which leaves me to ask Elvis 2008 and Tiny 12, so what's the new "culture war" argument to be, against ex-fossil fueled, ex-diesel trucking and mining companies, saving tens and hundreds of millions, by converting to electrified zero-emission EV trucking and mining, outlined in Pt. 1 and Pt. 2? Oh, I can't wait to hear this![/QUOTE]You do not listen to anything. You are engaged in a foolish and arrogant fight where no matter what is written you will admit to being the winner. To you, Europe and California are not dupes where they are paying through the nose for energy from stupid policies. They are wise pioneers.
China is not the most polluting nation in the world. Oh wait, you acknowledge that it is. Then you twirl around again and say the USA is the nation that HAD polluted the most. And? We live in the now and in the now, the USA has been polluting the world a whole lot less while China is polluting a whole lot more.
You yet again missed your dramatic takedown of your entire alternate energy scheme, so let me repeat it and hope that it sinks in this time:
China installed a record-setting 277 gigawatts of solar capacity in 2024. Headlines everywhere. The energy transition is here, they told us, and China is leading it.
What nobody mentioned: China's solar industry lost $60 billion that same year.
This is not a typo. Sixty billion dollars. China's solar industry's total losses exceeded the GDP of Luxembourg. More than 40 solar manufacturers have gone bankrupt or delisted since 2024. One-third of China's 121 listed solar producers are operating in the red. The top four manufacturers — the giants that were supposed to dominate the 21st century — collectively lost $1. 5 billion in the first half of 2025 alone. The previous year was worse. This year looks worse still.
In 2024, solar capacity grew by 45% while generation increased only 28%. Do the math and the implied capacity factor drops toward 11% or 12%. IEEFA data shows utilization hours collapsed from 1,030 in 2020 to just 473 in 2024.
That means that roughly five-sixths of the time China's solar installations sit there doing nothing. They are the world's most expensive decorations — a clean-energy Potemkin village stretched across the provinces.
China is building solar capacity faster than it can use it, faster than its grid can absorb, faster than any economic logic would justify. The result is panels producing power that nobody can buy, connected to a grid that cannot handle the load, owned by companies that cannot turn a profit.
This is not an energy transition. This is an energy traffic jam.
End of quote. That you did not acknowledge any of this means you are in a cult, and the quickest you would learn that is if you put any skin in the game, but that is not your style. I challenged you and Tooms to put money in the game and bet on Kamala when you were so sure she would win, but neither of you cowards did so. And here you are as some old fart trying to persuade those younger than you what to do with the future and where to put our tax dollars. That is why you always use the term petrostate or electrostate. You are too much of a coward to put any of your own skin in the game.
As for your latest cult post, there was this
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061706]Take Fortescue Ltd of Australia (4th-largest iron ore producer in the world), that will be eliminating about 450 million liters of annual diesel consumption, as the result of a massive, multi-pronged electrification strategy, and save upwards of US$400 million dollars in savings,from replacing fossil fuel diesel-powered haul trucks and excavators with electric alternatives, coupled with the company's own renewable energy generation of as they now make their own natural clean fuel, on site.[/QUOTE]If you did any of your own investing, you would see how often projections like this end up being dead wrong. Do you think anyone makes a plan like this and says, "Yeah, it is going to cost more. " The problem with your cult like behavior is that you do not acknowledge the unknown. Here are energy experts talking about the current energy market:
The first inescapable determination is that the price of oil is effectively capped at an upper bound. Imagine knowing ahead of time what would unfold in March and being given the opportunity to speculate on the peak front-month price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) or Brent crude. If the over / under were struck at $150, we would have bet your subscription money on the over. That neither came close to reaching that level is profoundly important.
What kept a lid on prices? The overt actions of politicians around the world, who actively intervened in the market, primarily by releasing reserves but also by engaging in significant—and many would argue inappropriate—jawboning.
Mountains were moved to keep a lid on any upward momentum during the present war. These efforts ensured that front-month WTI didn't even breach the nominal highs seen during the war in Ukraine, let alone the levels observed ahead of the global financial crisis in 2008. On an inflation-adjusted basis, the current peak was half the Icarus print of 18 years ago, which occurred at the height of the peak cheap oil hysteria.
In times of energy shortages, if you are betting on increasing prices, you should know that the government is effectively your counterparty to the trade. The authorities don't want energy prices to skyrocket and will do whatever is required.
End of link. If such a scheme were tried in the USA and the government decided to not tax diesel and the effective price on diesel plummeted, this cost savings plan would fall flat on its face.
And that is just the political risk. Then there is the supply and market risk. Another link:
Despite a global bull market in energy and a shortage of liquefied natural gas (LNG) caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and Iran's attacks on Qatar's LNG export facilities, spot prices for natural gas in the Permian Basin traded at deeply negative levels throughout the war. Front-month prices at the more commonly cited Henry Hub also ground lower as the war dragged on, and currently fetch an energy-equivalent price of approximately $16 per barrel of oil. Why? Because globally elevated oil prices spur more drilling, which produces more associated natural gas than the market can handle.
The oil-to-gas price ratio—which physics dictates should trade at less than 6, and which we had predicted would eventually get there—blew out again to over 40, signaling that more engines capable of burning natural gas are urgently needed in North America. Companies that make and ultimately utilize them will be at a significant market advantage.
End of link. So here we go again. You do the dumb Dem thing and make political insults while constantly showing you are a simpleton. The only way you can know if there are going to be savings is if you know what the future price of electricity is and the future price of diesel is. Did you come on this forum and successful predict what would happen in the energy markets? No? Then why should anyone listen to you now? Compounding your ignorance, you then invoke politics when confronted by your lack of knowledge. Oh, you are a MAGA guy. What do you know? You are stupid.
I repeat the fact that you have no skin in the game and yet want others to put their skin in the game defines you as a coward. All you have shown me once again is that you will suck down all Democratic and alternative energy propaganda and ignore or ridicule all those critical of said propaganda.
-
3 photos
What is behind those low poll numbers for Dems and Repubs? Mostly it's about Trump.
[QUOTE=Canada;3061764]Trump ratings may be lower now for Trump but polls on Democrats are much lower than Trump. Just because Trump is for a strong USA doesn't mean you have to be anti American. You can cheer for USA and Trump rather than Hamas, Iran and the rest of the terrorists. USA economy is very strong and experts in business can see it in the confidence of the markets. Only a fool can't see a strong America now.[/QUOTE]Much of the reason Dems have done so well in special post-November 2024 elections, overperforming previous numbers in virtually every case, flipping dozens of Red seats while Repubs have flipped none, is because so many Independents and even some Repubs have wised up about the existential threat Trump and his Repubs pose to America:
[B]Not just the base: Democrats in recent elections are flipping independent and Republican votes.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/01/politics/democrats-elections-flip-seats[/URL]
[QUOTE]When asked about the results in Senate District 14, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis responded Tuesday that the Republican loss despite an apparent GOP turnout advantage suggested both poor performance with independents and that [b]Republicans are voting the other way.[/b] He also noted his differences with Jane Tomkow, the Republican who lost to Gregory.[/QUOTE][B]A new CNN poll reveals how people mad at both parties see the midterms.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/03/politics/cnn-poll-double-haters-democrats-midterms[/URL]
[QUOTE][b]What do double haters hate?[/b]
When asked what they most dislike about each party, double haters offer different reasons for their dissatisfaction with each. [B]Their most common reasons for disliking Democrats are viewing them as do-nothing (22% say this), saying theyre not standing up enough to Trump and the GOP (11%)[/b] or theyre too liberal (10%). Another 9% call them weak or spineless, with another 9% saying the party doesnt care about people..[/QUOTE]Yep. It turns out the most common way Dems, Independents and more and more Repub voters are "cheering for America" is by expressing disapproval for any side that hasn't done enough in their minds to stand up to and prevent Trump from destroying America and then to vote for the one side, Dems, that can and will do it when they are finally put in a position of power to do it.
-
If you're an Albertan does that still make you a Canadian? Duh!
[QUOTE=Canada;3061662] Canada economy will completely tank if he thinks he can play hardball with Trump. Canada absolutely needs to export to USA as over 80% of exports go to USA.[/QUOTE]PM Mark Carney, has 4 x times the smarts, as your MAGA Fuhrer, somehow I don't think for a second, Canadians are remotely worried. Plus the lame duck MAGA president is toast come mid-terms.
[QUOTE=Canada;3059559]I am Canadian. Biden tried to destroy USA and Trudeau virtually destroyed Canada.[/QUOTE]Canada, I guess Tiny 12, can't read, where you also said you were Canadian! But I guess some people just have trouble reading and don't think you can be both?
Perhaps you could also impart on Tiny 12, how a "one-trick pony", in times where the price of oil drops significantly, it results low provincial revenue and deficits, as was the case when the NDP took office, oil prices fell from over US $100 a barrel to around $30-$40 US and stayed low.
And how your high-cost "one-trick pony", only really does well, when the price of oil is high. Like now with your MAGA Fuhrer's illegal war on Iran.
Looking forward to your Canadian take on the subject, or should I say Tiny 12 response, as I wonder who the real Canadian is?
[QUOTE=Tiny12][b]Canada said he's an Albertan.[/b] The last time the leftist NDP controlled the Alberta government, from 2015 to 2019, GDP in 2007 dollars fell from 330 billion CAD to 306 billion in 2016, before rebounding to 325 billion at the end of their time in office. In other words, over a 4 year period, GDP didn't grow.[/QUOTE]LOL! Once again your logic is astounding. So when did being an Albertan, stop him from also being Canadian? Which he also stated he was! [I](BTW it goes without saying!)[/I].
Thanks again, for the one-trick pony "Tiny 12" history lesson of Alberta. Albeit a very lopsided, cherry picked one.
But perhaps you can get Canada, to give you a more precise history of the dollar, oil and gas problems of Alberta, that isn't just conveniently [B]cherry picked over a four (4) period, out of the last 50 year sin power.[/B] Perhaps a more vital history lesson, on how Canada's mismanagement, bungling and inept right-wing conservative party (UCP) were in power over those past 50 years, screwed-up multiple times, sold out Albertans and squandering their heritage funds and then blaming the feds. Sounds like what American red state do?
The real crooks, the UCP, the ones that have been in power for the past 50 years (save 4 years), are the very same ones, critics have argued for decades that the alberta heritage fund (only a measly $30 billion since 1976), was [B]"squandered"[/B] or [B]"underutilized"[/B] (aka. Pick-pocketed by conservative cronies) compared to similar glorious models in Norway ($2. 2 Trillion, since 1990) or Alaska ($80 billion, since 1976). I'm sure that's the Alberta, true Canadians know remember.
-
Dude, it was you posting from Wikipedia
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061756]From your Wikipedia and World Population Review links above, the [B]per capita[/B] carbon emissions per GJ energy consumed are as follows:[/QUOTE]LOL! Your so hilarious and funny, you don't even remember what you've posted!
[B]I didn't post that Wikipedia link, you did![/B] I know because the per capital data was from 2023, which I thought was lame, since we are now in 2026 and my links have data from 2024 and 2025.
So once you've checked, it was indeed you who posted those Wiki out dated data, then get back to me with proper assessments and no doubt that funky asinine logic of yours.
-
Petrostate: USA Fossil Fuel Fudged Numbers of Desperation
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061756]From your Wikipedia and World Population Review links above, the [B]per capita[/B] carbon emissions per GJ energy consumed are as follows:
China: 9. 24 tons /111.94 GJ = 0.083 tons / GJ.
Australia: 14.21 tons /204.77 GJ = 0.069 tons / GJ.
USA: 13.83 tons /265.85 GJ = 0.052 tons / GJ.[/QUOTE]LOL! Not only do you not remember what you posted, now you are just making shit up and fudging numbers, into bogus calculations. Didn't take a genius to ferret out your bullshit!
[B]First, [/B]show me where your bogus calculation are being used in industry.
[B]Second,[/B] the calculations would be wrong anyways, since you didn't even take time to check the if the data (from the 2 links I provided) weren't even from the same time periods.
[I]And ...[/I]
[B]Third,[/B] stop wasting my fucking time, with your bullshit attempts to shoehorn data, into your crazy narratives and logic, that is just plain preposterous and comical at best!
Your desperation, reeks of something much akin to the current petrostate and auto industry, to the shock and raise of the clean energy electrostate.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061848]
[B]Third,[/B] stop wasting my fucking time, with your bullshit attempts to shoehorn data, into your crazy narratives and logic, that is just plain preposterous and comical at best!
[/QUOTE]When reality doesn't agree with your narrative you nitpick. Or threaten to RTM me for an attempt at humor. Elvis is right, it's your religion. I won't try to enlighten you anymore. I tried that with a Mormon once and it ended up the same way this has.
A parting comment, you should ask ChatGPT or Gemini the question “Is the ratio of CO2 emissions to energy consumed higher for the USA or China?”
-
Calling on Canada
Hi Canada,
I've done some business in Alberta, but have never lived there. So I know very little about the government there compared to you. A few questions for you.
Has the UCP party been in power for 50 years? I thought it started fairly recently.
Do you know if there's any evidence conservative politicians have stolen money from Alberta's Heritage Fund?
I understand most of the money that went into the Heritage Fund was spent on government services and infrastructure. Do you think this money was squandered? FYI, here in the USA, the federal government is financed by the taxpayers, and borrowings from Treasury investors and from the Social Security Trust Fund. And our wasteful and inefficient federal government does squander a lot of what it spends. My state and local governments on the other hand, which are run by Republicans, provide good value for the money. They're the ones in charge of the roads, water, sewers, police, firemen, and so on.
I'm reading that a comparatively small amount of money that went through the Heritage Fund was spent on politicians' pet pork projects. Notably, there was a $65 million loan to Gainers meat plant, which defaulted, and $100 million invested in Magnesium Company of Canada that was lost. You're a keen observer of USA Politics. Do you think the corporate pork gifting in Alberta is worse than in the USA? For example there was Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, which should have been named the Green Energy Corporate Pork Plan. By Goldman Sach's estimate, this was going to cost $1. 2 trillion over 10 years. I'd suspect Alberta's spending on corporate pork isn't as egregious, but don't really know.
-
Reddit dude, sounds off about Alberta Conservatives!
Reddit dude sounds off about Alberta Conservatives!
[QUOTE=Canada;3061626]Unfortunately Canada is like California. The big cities vote in the political parties. The western states don't have enough people to change a crooked government just like rural CA gets screwed. Luckily USA has Trump but unfortunately we can't get a Trump in Canada unless we separate from Canada. But not enough votes for that either. [/QUOTE]Such adorable and wishful thinking on your MAGA Fuhrer in Canada, but alas, fewer than one in five Canadians, what anything to do with the Epstein pedo sympathizer [URL]https://researchco.ca/2025/11/06/people-canada/[/URL]. Also judging by your MAGA Fuhrer's 30% approval polls, he's not wanted in [I]the U.S. either[/I].
But speaking of Alberta Conservative corruption and ineptitude:
[B]Reddit Dude Speaks the Truth:[/B] It would seem (FWIW on Reddit anyways), that not all Albertans would agree with that sentiment:[LIST][i]"Alberta got screwed. We couldve been Norway rich and instead were broke -- Alberta got robbed! Not by outsiders, but by our own government selling us out to industry. Thank you Conservatives"[/i][URL]www.reddit.com/r/alberta/comments/1n2uvck/alberta_got_screwed_we_couldve_been_norway_rich/[/url][/LIST]This Reddit dude, is so right. If that initial $1. 5 billion (in 1976) had been simply left in a diversified long-term low-risk equity or index fund (similar to the S&P 500) and allowed to compound with no withdrawals, that value would be roughly $237 billion to over $600 billion, today.
-
Business in Alberta
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061883]Hi Canada,
I've done some business in Alberta, but have never lived there. So I know very little about the government there compared to you. A few questions for you.
Has the UCP party been in power for 50 years? I thought it started fairly recently.
Do you know if there's any evidence conservative politicians have stolen money from Alberta's Heritage Fund?
I understand most of the money that went into the Heritage Fund was spent on government services and infrastructure. Do you think this money was squandered? FYI, here in the USA, the federal government is financed by the taxpayers, and borrowings from Treasury investors and from the Social Security Trust Fund. And our wasteful and inefficient federal government does squander a lot of what it spends. My state and local governments on the other hand, which are run by Republicans, provide good value for the money. They're the ones in charge of the roads, water, sewers, police, firemen, and so on..[/QUOTE]I was in business in Alberta, BC and in the USA in the oil industry and got bought out in 2002. I spend more than half the time in USA and minimal time in Alberta now. Used to be half and half. I used to really keep up with the Canadian politics but now care more about USA politics. I think the liberals have been in power for over 50 years. That is why Canada is struggling. I am not sure if the Heritage Fund was looted by politicians but wouldn't surprise me as I know slot of funds were misspent. I think the Heritage Fund is still well funded. Many of my family is still in the oil industry in northern Alberta and make a good living but inflation and cost of living is expensive. Healthcare is great in Canada unless you get sick or need an operation. Then you are screwed. With times for knee, shoulder or hip surgery have waiting times of 2-4 years. Cancer patients waiting months for tests. Depressing. We can thank the liberals and socialists for that.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3061776]You do not listen to anything. You are engaged in a foolish and arrogant fight where no matter what is written you will admit to being the winner. To you, Europe and California are not dupes where they are paying through the nose for energy from stupid policies. They are wise pioneers.
China is not the most polluting nation in the world. Oh wait, you acknowledge that it is. Then you twirl around again and say the USA is the nation that HAD polluted the most. And? We live in the now and in the now, the USA has been polluting the world a whole lot less while China is polluting a whole lot more.
You yet again missed your dramatic takedown of your entire alternate energy scheme, so let me repeat it and hope that it sinks in this time:
China installed a record-setting 277 gigawatts of solar capacity in 2024. Headlines everywhere. The energy transition is here, they told us, and China is leading it.
What nobody mentioned: China's solar industry lost $60 billion that same year.
This is not a typo. Sixty billion dollars. China's solar industry's total losses exceeded the GDP of Luxembourg. More than 40 solar manufacturers have gone bankrupt or delisted since 2024. One-third of China's 121 listed solar producers are operating in the red. The top four manufacturers the giants that were supposed to dominate the 21st century collectively lost $1. 5 billion in the first half of 2025 alone. The previous year was worse. This year looks worse still..[/QUOTE]China make 30% pollution on our planet. Even crazy Trump can t compete to make USA polluting so much. And so many lies about given figures, when You see for real on the track. On Saturday morning on German autobahns where reality talk, when missing a lot of power compare to too heavy V8 , but pushing maximum going quite straight to cut curves, then You see electric just like snails, when would be 100 kms autonomy with me, when I could for 1000 kms with diesel. Quality versus fakes. But China is good for lies.
-
Hear, hear!
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3061776]You do not listen to anything. You are engaged in a foolish and arrogant fight where no matter what is written you will admit to being the winner. To you, Europe and California are not dupes where they are paying through the nose for energy from stupid policies. They are wise pioneers.
China is not the most polluting nation in the world. Oh wait, you acknowledge that it is. Then you twirl around again and say the USA is the nation that HAD polluted the most. And? We live in the now and in the now, the USA has been polluting the world a whole lot less while China is polluting a whole lot more.
You yet again missed your dramatic takedown of your entire alternate energy scheme, so let me repeat it and hope that it sinks in this time:
China installed a record-setting 277 gigawatts of solar capacity in 2024. Headlines everywhere. The energy transition is here, they told us, and China is leading it.
What nobody mentioned: China's solar industry lost $60 billion that same year.
This is not a typo. Sixty billion dollars. China's solar industry's total losses exceeded the GDP of Luxembourg. More than 40 solar manufacturers have gone bankrupt or delisted since 2024. One-third of China's 121 listed solar producers are operating in the red. The top four manufacturers the giants that were supposed to dominate the 21st century collectively lost $1. 5 billion in the first half of 2025 alone. The previous year was worse. This year looks worse still.
In 2024, solar capacity grew by 45% while generation increased only 28%. Do the math and the implied capacity factor drops toward 11% or 12%. IEEFA data shows utilization hours collapsed from 1,030 in 2020 to just 473 in 2024.
That means that roughly five-sixths of the time China's solar installations sit there doing nothing. They are the world's most expensive decorations a clean-energy Potemkin village stretched across the provinces.
China is building solar capacity faster than it can use it, faster than its grid can absorb, faster than any economic logic would justify. The result is panels producing power that nobody can buy, connected to a grid that cannot handle the load, owned by companies that cannot turn a profit.
This is not an energy transition. This is an energy traffic jam.
End of quote. That you did not acknowledge any of this means you are in a cult, and the quickest you would learn that is if you put any skin in the game, but that is not your style. I challenged you and Tooms to put money in the game and bet on Kamala when you were so sure she would win, but neither of you cowards did so. And here you are as some old fart trying to persuade those younger than you what to do with the future and where to put our tax dollars. That is why you always use the term petrostate or electrostate. You are too much of a coward to put any of your own skin in the game.
As for your latest cult post, there was this
If you did any of your own investing, you would see how often projections like this end up being dead wrong. Do you think anyone makes a plan like this and says, "Yeah, it is going to cost more. " The problem with your cult like behavior is that you do not acknowledge the unknown. Here are energy experts talking about the current energy market:
The first inescapable determination is that the price of oil is effectively capped at an upper bound. Imagine knowing ahead of time what would unfold in March and being given the opportunity to speculate on the peak front-month price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) or Brent crude. If the over / under were struck at $150, we would have bet your subscription money on the over. That neither came close to reaching that level is profoundly important.
What kept a lid on prices? The overt actions of politicians around the world, who actively intervened in the market, primarily by releasing reserves but also by engaging in significantand many would argue inappropriatejawboning.
Mountains were moved to keep a lid on any upward momentum during the present war. These efforts ensured that front-month WTI didn't even breach the nominal highs seen during the war in Ukraine, let alone the levels observed ahead of the global financial crisis in 2008. On an inflation-adjusted basis, the current peak was half the Icarus print of 18 years ago, which occurred at the height of the peak cheap oil hysteria.
In times of energy shortages, if you are betting on increasing prices, you should know that the government is effectively your counterparty to the trade. The authorities don't want energy prices to skyrocket and will do whatever is required.
End of link. If such a scheme were tried in the USA and the government decided to not tax diesel and the effective price on diesel plummeted, this cost savings plan would fall flat on its face.
And that is just the political risk. Then there is the supply and market risk. Another link:
Despite a global bull market in energy and a shortage of liquefied natural gas (LNG) caused by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz and Iran's attacks on Qatar's LNG export facilities, spot prices for natural gas in the Permian Basin traded at deeply negative levels throughout the war. Front-month prices at the more commonly cited Henry Hub also ground lower as the war dragged on, and currently fetch an energy-equivalent price of approximately $16 per barrel of oil. Why? Because globally elevated oil prices spur more drilling, which produces more associated natural gas than the market can handle.
The oil-to-gas price ratiowhich physics dictates should trade at less than 6, and which we had predicted would eventually get thereblew out again to over 40, signaling that more engines capable of burning natural gas are urgently needed in North America. Companies that make and ultimately utilize them will be at a significant market advantage.
End of link. So here we go again. You do the dumb Dem thing and make political insults while constantly showing you are a simpleton. The only way you can know if there are going to be savings is if you know what the future price of electricity is and the future price of diesel is. Did you come on this forum and successful predict what would happen in the energy markets? No? Then why should anyone listen to you now? Compounding your ignorance, you then invoke politics when confronted by your lack of knowledge. Oh, you are a MAGA guy. What do you know? You are stupid.
I repeat the fact that you have no skin in the game and yet want others to put their skin in the game defines you as a coward. All you have shown me once again is that you will suck down all Democratic and alternative energy propaganda and ignore or ridicule all those critical of said propaganda.[/QUOTE]Some excellent points Elvis. I fact checked a couple of items. The $60 billion loss in 2024 attributable to solar in China appears in multiple sources:
[URL]https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20260124181/chinas-green-energy-revolution-is-losing-60-billion-a-year-why-are-investors-still-throwing-money-at-it[/URL]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/china-solar-industry-address-overcapacity-challenge-turnaround-far-off-experts-2025-06-13[/URL]
"Losses in the photovoltaic manufacturing value chain reached $40 billion last year, while for the industry as a whole - including firms' other business lines - totalled $60 billion, Trina Solar (688599.SS), Chairman Gao Jifan said."
I think you were quoting from the January, 2026 Morningstar piece. If so, you missed this highlight,
[b]"China burns 56% of the world's coal, has tripled consumption since 2000 and is building coal plants at the fastest pace in a decade. Yet the Davos crowd continues to celebrate Beijing's "climate leadership" [u]with the enthusiasm of a golden retriever greeting a burglar."[/u][/b]
The part about negative gas prices in the Permian Basin is correct too. The price at the Waha Hub in Pecos County has been negative since February 4, 2026. The average price over the last 12 months was -$0. 46/ MMBTU, and the average for April though the 17th is -$6. 20/ MMBTU.
So the natural gas, which emits half the CO2 per BTU of useable energy as coal, and a hell of a lot less particulates, SO2 and NOx, is being given away. And the greenies don't want us to take advantage of that. While China chugs along generating 60%+ of its electricity from coal, and India is at 70%+, the USA is supposed to become like California. And eliminate hundreds of thousands of American jobs in the oil & gas sector.
The idea that the USA will ever be competitive with China in producing solar panels is a pipe dream. And China obviously will never be competitive with the USA in producing natural gas. A true economic liberal would say let each country do what it's best at. The Biden Administration instead pumped billions into manufacturing subsidies for solar. And would have kneecapped the oil and gas industry by banning drilling on federal leases if the courts and political reality hadn't intervened. I guess Biden was better than Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, Kirsten Gillibrand, Tom Steyer, Marianne Williamson, Andrew Yang, and Jay Inslee though, who all campaigned in 2019/2020 on banning fracking. That would make the USA an importer of natural gas. Dumb ass progressives.
-
Epstein
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061904]Reddit dude sounds off about Alberta Conservatives!
Such adorable and wishful thinking on your MAGA Fuhrer in Canada, but alas, fewer than one in five Canadians, what anything to do with the Epstein pedo sympathizer [URL]https://researchco.ca/2025/11/06/people-canada/[/URL]. Also judging by your MAGA Fuhrer's 30% approval polls, he's not wanted in [I]the U.S. either[/I].
But speaking of Alberta Conservative corruption and ineptitude:
[B]Reddit Dude Speaks the Truth:[/B] It would seem (FWIW on Reddit anyways), that not all Albertans would agree with that sentiment:[LIST][i]"Alberta got screwed. We couldve been Norway rich and instead were broke -- Alberta got robbed! Not by outsiders, but by our own government selling us out to industry. Thank you Conservatives"[/i][URL]www.reddit.com/r/alberta/comments/1n2uvck/alberta_got_screwed_we_couldve_been_norway_rich/[/url][/LIST]This Reddit dude, is so right. If that initial $1. 5 billion (in 1976) had been simply left in a diversified long-term low-risk equity or index fund (similar to the S&P 500) and allowed to compound with no withdrawals, that value would be roughly $237 billion to over $600 billion, today.[/QUOTE]Why do you keep lying about Trump and Epstein? It is getting old. The only politician linked to Epstein was Clinton and he seems to have skirted that. Either shut up about this or provide one piece of evidence that everyone knows doesn't exist. Sad that you have to make up things to post.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3062204]Why do you keep lying about Trump and Epstein? It is getting old. The only politician linked to Epstein was Clinton and he seems to have skirted that. Either shut up about this or provide one piece of evidence that everyone knows doesn't exist. Sad that you have to make up things to post.[/QUOTE]Isn't Trump appearing many times in Epstein files? And how many women who were less than majority, tell Trump abused them. Same than his criminal friend Netanyahou, I think Trump would have problems with US justice if he was not protected as president.
-
Facts are!
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3062248]Isn't Trump appearing many times in Epstein files? And how many women who were less than majority, tell Trump abused them. Same than his criminal friend Netanyahou, I think Trump would have problems with US justice if he was not protected as president.[/QUOTE]Facts are.
Trump reported Epstein to police in 2006 and locked him out of his club because he was a creep.
Biden controlled the presidency, house and senate and did not release any files. If there was something in the Epstein files implicating Trump the democrats would have jumped on it. But facts are most of Epstein friends were democrats.
It shows what type of a person that you are that you slander someone with zero facts. You must be a democrat or a friend of Epstein. No other explanation for your despicable actions.
-
Why are you lying?
One piece of evidence that everyone knows doesn't exist" is an interesting framing for court-released flight logs.
A US Attorney for the Southern District of New York confirmed Trump flew on Epstein's jet at least eight times between 1993 and 1996. Four of those flights included Ghislaine Maxwell Epstein's convicted co-conspirator. One flight included only Trump, Epstein, and a 20-year-old whose name was redacted. [URL=https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00016732.pdf]Source: DOJ original prosecutor email[/URL] [URL=https://www.npr.org/2025/12/23/nx-s1-5653302/more-epstein-files-released-trump-mentioned] and here: Justice Department releases more Epstein files and some mention Trump - Source: NPR[/URL]
Clinton flew on the jet too. Nobody said otherwise.
[B]Take your time with the evidence that doesn't exist[/B]
-
That's correct!
That's right Tucker Carlson. You and all the rest of the MAGA enablers just like you should be wrestling with your douchebag consciences. You misled millions of stupid Americans. Only, unlike your pathetic attempt to rewrite history, you [B]did[/B] do it intentionally. Those with any sense and a respect for the truth have been consistently saying the same things about Donald Chump. So many times he both told us and showed us who and what he is. It was high time a long time ago to start believing him! So take your "apology" and shove it!
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2026/04/21/tucker-carlson-apology-trump-election-brother/89714301007/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3062189]Some excellent points Elvis. I fact checked a couple of items. The $60 billion loss in 2024 attributable to solar in China appears in multiple sources:[/QUOTE]The Morningstar piece was written by a subscriber to Doomberg, an energy news letter ranked #1 or #2 of all financial news letters on substack. Unlike the traditional media, the Doomberg authors have skewered the green energy nonsense unlike any other site.
Thing is that I and suspect you are not anti-green energy. It is not green, so alternative is a better word, and I and I suspect you are not anti-alternative energy; we just want our tax dollars put into alternative energy when it makes sense.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3062189]So the natural gas, which emits half the CO2 per BTU of useable energy as coal, and a hell of a lot less particulates, SO2 and NOx, is being given away. And the greenies don't want us to take advantage of that. While China chugs along generating 60%+ of its electricity from coal, and India is at 70%+, the USA is supposed to become like California. And eliminate hundreds of thousands of American jobs in the oil & gas sector.
The idea that the USA will ever be competitive with China in producing solar panels is a pipe dream. And China obviously will never be competitive with the USA in producing natural gas. A true economic liberal would say let each country do what it's best at. The Biden Administration instead pumped billions into manufacturing subsidies for solar. And would have kneecapped the oil and gas industry by banning drilling on federal leases if the courts and political reality hadn't intervened. I guess Biden was better than Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Cory Booker, Kirsten Gillibrand, Tom Steyer, Marianne Williamson, Andrew Yang, and Jay Inslee though, who all campaigned in 2019/2020 on banning fracking. That would make the USA an importer of natural gas. Dumb ass progressives.[/QUOTE]Well, those chickens are coming home to roost. All those "progressive" places are soon going to be running out of gasoline. The jet fuel shortage in Asia is already here and going to get worse. That California literally gets half its gasoline from refiners in China and India was one of the dumbest things I have heard about California ever, and now China is not exporting anymore. Didn't those dolts learn anything from Covid and being too dependent on China?
If China did not spend money on the alternative energy scam, they should have. The green energy movement was praising China while it was amping up coal mines like never in history. Before the OPEC oil embargo, Europe produced 30% of their own energy. They got it up to 70% and thanks to the European green parties, it is back now to 30%.
That is excluding Russian natural gas. If Russia was not paying the greenies to shut down the nukes and get Europe dependent on their natural gas, they should have been.
And the reason the USA is in the best position right now is because the red states have tuned out the greenies and developed on our own resources. There is shale oil and gas in Europe and in China. China just cannot figure out how to access it, and Europe does not appear that interested in doing so.
On a personal note, I have been trying to get alternative energy working on my RV. For free energy, it is crazy expensive. I was afraid of overusing the generator and talked to the shop about how long the generators last, and they told me they last a long time, and the diesel ones even more so. Thing is my current generator cannot run two AC units, and that is what I want. The one AC unit is not enough to keep the RV cool in the Texas heat.
So I bought the most energy efficient AC unit for about $1500 as a second one and $3000 worth of batteries to run it. That should keep the AC going for 12 hours. Thing is I was next looking at solar panels. It looks like it is going to take 8 hours to charge them now this versus 2 or 3 with the generator or plugging into an AC socket on the wall. At this point, I am like, why do you really want to buy said panels? Unless I wanted to brag about being off grid, and off grid means using the generator, I really would not be.
It makes me wonder how they are charging all those batteries on the grid. I suspect a lot of those batteries backing up those alternative power sources are not being charged by alternative energy.
Anyway, the $300 annual subscription to Doomberg has been well worth it. It sure has left Spidy spinning his wheels.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3062310]Trump reported Epstein to police in 2006 and locked him out of his club because he was a creep.
Biden controlled the presidency, house and senate and did not release any files. If there was something in the Epstein files implicating Trump the democrats would have jumped on it. But facts are most of Epstein friends were democrats.[/QUOTE]It should be hard for any reasonable person to disagree with that. If Merrick Garland or Leticia James had a case against Trump, you'd think he / she would have made it.
I didn't vote for Trump. And there are a lot of things not to like about him. But painting him with the "P" word based on extremely weak evidence is beyond the pale.
Jeffrey Epstein deserved what he got. Prince Andrew allegedly had relations with Virginia Giuffre when she was 17, in New York, the USVI, and London. At the time the age of consent was 17 in New York, 16 in London and 18 in the USVI. So yes, presumably he could be accused of statutory rape for the time he allegedly spent with her in the USVI. Finally, Jean-Luc Brunel was a scumbag.
As to the rest of the men, judge not lest ye be judged. Many board members have banged a lot more women than Trump or Clinton. Many are married. Some have been with women who feminists would argue were being exploited. What Epstein's buddies allegedly did, why was that immoral, while going to a fishbowl in Bangkok, an FKK in Germany, or a hoe-house in Colombia is not?
-
2 photos
The Biden DOJ did not have the files implicating Trump the most. And more.
[QUOTE=Canada;3062310]Facts are.
Trump reported Epstein to police in 2006 and locked him out of his club because he was a creep.
Biden controlled the presidency, house and senate and did not release any files. If there was something in the Epstein files implicating Trump the democrats would have jumped on it. But facts are most of Epstein friends were democrats.
It shows what type of a person that you are that you slander someone with zero facts. You must be a democrat or a friend of Epstein. No other explanation for your despicable actions.[/QUOTE]Again.
The thousands of files, documents and the many emails regarding Donald Trump were only discovered and released due to a civil lawsuit filed against the Epstein Estate in 2025, after Biden was no longer president.
Note the date of this report:
[B]What's inside the thousands of documents from Epstein estate released by House committee.
Nov. 12, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-epstein-emails-11-12-25[/URL]
[QUOTE]About 20,000 more pages of documents from Jeffrey Epsteins estate were released publicly today by the House Oversight Committee.
Epstein mentioned Donald Trump by name multiple times in emails over the last 15 years with an associate and an author in Trumps orbit.
Trump today called the saga a hoax and blasted Democrats for releasing the emails in a fiery post to his Truth Social platform.
What to know about the documents: The emails were obtained by the Oversight Committee them after the panel subpoenaed Epsteins estate earlier this year. A first tranche of records from the estate were released by the committee in September.
What the White House is saying: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the release of Epsteins emails that mentioned Trump prove absolutely nothing, other than the fact that President Trump did nothing wrong.
Dog that hasnt barked: In one email dated April 2, 2011
Epstein emailed his longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell: i want you to realize that that dog that hasnt barked is trump.. REDACTED spent hours at my house with him ,, he has never once been mentioned. police chief. etc. im 75 % there. GOP members of the House Oversight committee identified the person as Virginia Giuffre.
...........
Comments on Trump: Epstein called Trump borderline insane in a 2018 email exchange with former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers.[/QUOTE]Oh look. Every newly-minted Deficit Hawk's favorite likely fellow Epstein kiddie-diddler Larry Summers made a cameo appearance!
And to clarify:
[B]Why Biden DOJ Didn't Release Jeffrey Epstein Files [/B]
[URL]https://www.newsweek.com/biden-doj-release-jeffrey-epstein-files-11081415[/URL]
[QUOTE]Under Biden, the DOJ and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) did collectively hold more than 100,000 pages of evidence related to Epstein, spanning digital records, grand jury testimony, and physical evidence seized from his properties, as reported by Vox.
But both agencies have cited longstanding legal restrictions as well as the sensitive content of certain materials including evidence of child sexual abuse and personally identifiable information about victims as reasons why some files could not be publicly released.
The Justice Department under Biden did not unilaterally release all Epstein-related files, in large part due to these established legal constraints.
..........
Grand jury transcripts can only be disclosed with a federal judges explicit approval a condition that courts have so far denied, even in the face of public and political pressure.
[B]Additionally, agencies must withhold files that could compromise active investigations or violate the privacy and rights of Epsteins victims, in line with federal law and the terms of recent congressional legislation.[/b] [/QUOTE]Now, on this unsubstantiated claim that Trump "called the police on" his closest friend for 15 years, Jeffrey Epstein, that isn't even a claim Trump has made. At most, he called the local sheriff to chat about it AFTER Epstein had already been indicted on those charges and made a startling confession about how he apparently stood by in the face of knowledge of Epstein and Maxwell's kiddie-diddling and rape, perhaps even personally witnessing it, and said nothing to anyone of authority about it.
[B]WATCH: White House won't confirm whether Trump called Palm Beach sheriff about Epstein[/B]
[URL]https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-white-house-wont-confirm-whether-trump-called-palm-beach-sheriff-about-epstein[/URL]
[B]Trump told police chief 'everyone' knew about Epstein, FBI document says[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-told-police-chief-everyone-knew-about-epstein-fbi-document-says-2026-02-10/[/URL]
-
The MAGA Rats are jumping off the Trumptanic
[QUOTE=TheCane;3062351]That's right Tucker Carlson. You and all the rest of the MAGA enablers just like you should be wrestling with your douchebag consciences. You misled millions of stupid Americans. Only, unlike your pathetic attempt to rewrite history, you [B]did[/B] do it intentionally. Those with any sense and a respect for the truth have been consistently saying the same things about Donald Chump. So many times he both told us and showed us who and what he is. It was high time a long time ago to start believing him! So take your "apology" and shove it!
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2026/04/21/tucker-carlson-apology-trump-election-brother/89714301007/[/URL][/QUOTE]From your link:
[QUOTE]"You and I and everyone else who supported him, you wrote speeches for him, I campaigned for him, I mean we're implicated in this for sure," he said on a Monday, April 20, episode of "The Tucker Carlson Show," in conversation with his former GOP speechwriter brother, Buckley Carlson. "It's not enough to say, 'I changed my mind.' Or like, 'Oh this is bad, I'm out.' It's like, in very small ways, but in real ways, you and me and millions of people like us are the reason this is happening right now."[/QUOTE]Carlson, Maher, MTG, Jones, Rogan and other MAGA rats are only speaking out now because they see their beloved Repub Party going down hard this November and therefore their Lord and Savior will be held accountable by the Dems and soon the Law.
By Carlson's reasoning there is no logical reason everyone who could have but didn't vote for Harris in 2024 shouldn't also be prosecuted to the full extent of the Law for their murderous, treasonous and traitorous participation in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people around the World, mostly children, and the attempted destruction of America and democracy. That might be the first lucid, fair and reasonable idea a Repub MAGA has ever had.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3062370]As to the rest of the men, judge not lest ye be judged. Many board members have banged a lot more women than Trump or Clinton. Many are married. Some have been with women who feminists would argue were being exploited. What Epstein's buddies allegedly did, why was that immoral, while going to a fishbowl in Bangkok, an FKK in Germany, or a hoe-house in Colombia is not?[/QUOTE]Sigh. Don't you know all mongers and hookers are law abiding citizens? The only criminal in the world is Trump!
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3062388]Again.
The thousands of files, documents and the many emails regarding Donald Trump were only discovered and released due to a civil lawsuit filed against the Epstein Estate in 2025, after Biden was no longer president.
Note the date of this report:
Oh look. Every newly-minted Deficit Hawk's favorite likely fellow Epstein kiddie-diddler Larry Summers made a cameo appearance!
And to clarify:
Why Biden DOJ Didn't Release Jeffrey Epstein Files [/QUOTE]LOL. Oh, here we go again. The release was objective and had no political motivation at all. I mean it was just like Ukrainegate, based on a completely neutral government observer. It was not partisan at all. Gee, where have we heard that before?
[URL]https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/2043675622841421995/photo/1[/URL]
Whistleblower met with Democrats on House Intelligence Committee (then led by Adam Schiff) BEFORE reporting his allegations to the Intelligence Community Inspector General.
Yeah, the criminal trial in NY, the sexual assault case, the business case about loan fraud, the case in Georgia, why all of those were just routine; it was not like any lawyer was actively targeting Trump right?
The release and timing of the Epstein files was just more lawfare bullshit. The difference though is unlike those other matters Trump and Pam Bondi did not help themselves with what they said. You dumb Dems have cried wolf so much so one believes you anymore. You could have an actual video of Trump having sex with a young boy, and I still would not believe it. That is how much you have lied and cried wolf.
You Dems are so dumb with your Trump bashing and so used to it as a means to show how smart you are that you cannot stop. What is the end game with all the Trump bashing? You want to impeach him? Go ahead! It will make Republicans stronger. Every time, you dumb Dems try to usurp the election results it blows up in your face.
Why you dumb Dems do not shut the hell up about Trump and go about picking a decent candidate is beyond me. You lost to him at least two out of three times, and all you dumb Dems is call MAGA folks stupid. What does it say about you that your last president was demented and your last pick was an alcoholic airhead?
Yeah, that was brilliant. Let's pick as our candidate someone who got 1% of the primary votes, and dumb Dems like you continue to champion how smart she was. I cannot wait to see how she fares in the primaries in 2028. Harris was the ultimate DEI pol.
-
Your post proves me right
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3062388]Again.
The thousands of files, documents and the many emails regarding Donald Trump were only discovered and released due to a civil lawsuit filed against the Epstein Estate in 2025, after Biden was no longer president.
Note the date of this report:
[B]What's inside the thousands of documents from Epstein estate released by House committee.
Nov. 12, 2025[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-epstein-emails-11-12-25[/URL]
Oh look. Every newly-minted Deficit Hawk's favorite likely fellow Epstein kiddie-diddler Larry Summers made a cameo appearance!.[/QUOTE]Your posts prove me right. Biden DOJ had the files and didn't release them. Everyone knows the Biden DOJ looked at every Epstein file and then stalled because there was no wrong doing by Trump. Several thousand people names were in the files just by association. Trump calling the police was in the Epstein files and the police still had the audio on the call. These are facts. And reading the posts you provided backs these facts up. Thanks.
-
USA is the greatest 667, 100 megatonnes CO2/ GHG emitter since recording began
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3061776]
China is not the most polluting nation in the world.
...
What nobody mentioned: China's solar industry lost $60 billion that same year.
...
End of quote.[/QUOTE][B]United States of America's Historic Contribution to Global Warming Since 1850[/B], Nov 2025. [URL]https://climatechangetracker.org/nations/greenhouse-gas-emissions/united-states-of-america/historical-impact[/URL]
Oh Please! How you do love repost reams of text from an article, just to make it look like your own speech.
Dude, if you don't have the wherewithal, or are just to lazy to paraphrase into your own thoughts. Just post the link (or at least include the link), I can read the article for myself.
BTW, I've already addressed your the very same claims in your post here: Electrostate vs. Petrosate: China is playing the 'clean energy long game' [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics[/URL]
-
Don't believe the lies, Canadians, hate the MAGA President?
[QUOTE=Canada;3062204]Why do you keep lying about Trump and Epstein? It is getting old. The only politician linked to Epstein was Clinton and he seems to have skirted that. Either shut up about this or provide one piece of evidence that everyone knows doesn't exist. Sad that you have to make up things to post. [/QUOTE]Nah, just here to correct your lies! Canadians, hate your MAGA Fuhrer!
[B]Canadians opinions of the U.S. and its president are at or near historic lows,[/B] Jul 24,2025 [URL]https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/07/24/canadians-opinions-of-the-us-and-its-president-are-at-or-near-historic-lows/[/URL] Canadians not only do they hate your MAGA Fuhrer, they see him as a charlatan, [B]an Epstein pedo sympathizer,[/B] rallied against him, with Americans, in all of the three (3) "NO KINGS" protests.
Here's a shocker, the "pussy grabber" and pedo president sympathizer, Canadians love to hate:
Justice Department publishes documents with sexual assault allegations against Trump and found the DOJ has withheld some Epstein files related to allegations that [B]President Trump sexually abused a minor,[/B] an NPR investigation finds. Feb 24,2026 [URL]https://www.npr.org/2026/02/24/nx-s1-5723968/epstein-files-trump-accusation-maxwell[/URL]
[U]Here's the kicker, why Canadians hate Your MAGA Fuhrer:[/U]
BTW, you know the most compelling reason, why I think Canadians hate your Fuhrer, is most evident by the fact, [I][b]your Conservative party, apparently had a 27-pt lead[/b][/I] going into the 2025 elections and lost an election, by all accounts they should have won.
[B]Why did they lose?[/B] Apparently Canadians, thought that your pitiful Conservative party [I]did not[/I] distance themselves enough from the pedo sympathizer MAGA president, as he was bashing Canada, it seems Canadians, felt they didn't stand up strong enough and were kowtowing to the MAGA Fuhrer. And they LOST, big time! [B]How Canada's Conservatives threw away a 27-point lead to lose again,[/B] May 3, 2025. [URL]https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crkx3gdvv75o[/URL]
So before you go telling more lies and bullshit about, [I][b]"...how Canadians want your MAGA Fuhrer",[/b][/I] instead of flapping you gums about Canadian nonsense, perhaps you could try providing the very same proof, you claim others are not providing, and stop yourself from lying and making things up!
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3062521][B]United States of America's Historic Contribution to Global Warming Since 1850[/B], Nov 2025. [URL]https://climatechangetracker.org/nations/greenhouse-gas-emissions/united-states-of-america/historical-impact[/URL]
Oh Please! How you do love repost reams of text from an article, just to make it look like your own speech.
Dude, if you don't have the wherewithal, or are just to lazy to paraphrase into your own thoughts. Just post the link (or at least include the link), I can read the article for myself.
BTW, I've already addressed your the very same claims in your post here: Electrostate vs. Petrosate: China is playing the 'clean energy long game' [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics[/URL][/QUOTE]LOL. Man, I am so sick of mongers like you. You live in these foreign lands and then gripe when people who work for a living and whose time is more value than money come in and pay top $ for the best women.
Then you tell us what to do with our tax dollars when all you are doing is sponging off the system while living abroad. You yourself said that you have never met anyone who has not sponged off government.
We live here, fool. We breathe the air. We rely on our grid to be stable. Grid failures affect our lives; it is not some headline like it is for you. Guys like you who have no skin in the game should not be allowed to vote let alone diictate what OUR future as a nation should be. Let's be real. All you care about is that money is shoved to pet Democratic causes so the Dems can keep paying you. Why should anyone care what you think? Because you care about the future of the USA while living in Brazil? ROTFLMAO!
-
3 photos
Uh
[QUOTE=Canada;3062508]Your posts prove me right. Biden DOJ had the files and didn't release them. Everyone knows the Biden DOJ looked at every Epstein file and then stalled because there was no wrong doing by Trump. Several thousand people names were in the files just by association. Trump calling the police was in the Epstein files and the police still had the audio on the call. These are facts. And reading the posts you provided backs these facts up. Thanks.[/QUOTE]And the reason Trump, his DOJ and the Repubs in Congress are shitting all over themselves and each other to avoid at all costs releasing all those juicy files that exonerate Trump and other Repubs but damns and implicates Dems is?
And please be specific with a link to something, anything that didn't just pop out of Trump's blithering, blathering lying mouth or that of a member of his Trump Presidential Liquor Cabinet.
-
You know nothing about Canada
[QUOTE=Spidy;3062524]Nah, just here to correct your lies! Canadians, hate your MAGA Fuhrer!
[B]Canadians opinions of the U.S. and its president are at or near historic lows,[/B] Jul 24,2025 [URL]https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/07/24/canadians-opinions-of-the-us-and-its-president-are-at-or-near-historic-lows/[/URL] Canadians not only do they hate your MAGA Fuhrer, they see him as a charlatan, [B]an Epstein pedo sympathizer,[/B] rallied against him, with Americans, in all of the three (3) "NO KINGS" protests.
Here's a shocker, the "pussy grabber" and pedo president sympathizer, Canadians love to hate:[/QUOTE]You know nothing about Canadians. Alberta likes Trump a hell of a lot more than Carney. Once again you just spew made up crap that isn't true. You read something in a far left fake news site and then continue to spread their lies. How long have you been a Canadian? Once again you show the stupidity of posting a link from BBC fake news. They are worse than CNN. Shows a lot about you.
-
Electrostate v Petrostate: The 'unquantifiable' balance sheets of Chinese Solar Firms
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3062535]LOL. Man, I am so sick of mongers like you. ... Because you care about the future of the USA while living in Brazil? ROTFLMAO![/QUOTE]Speaking of Brazil, in August 2025, for the first time in their grid's history, wind and solar power generated more than a third of Brazil's electricity, accounting for 34% of the country's electricity generation, producing a monthly record of 19 terawatt-hours (TWh) [URL]https://apnews.com/article/brazil-wind-solar-power-electricity-renewable-energy-13eef596389803e8b801f26e7888fb97[/URL]. They also lead the G20 with 89% renewables [URL]https://brazilenergyinsight.com/2024/07/15/brazils-green-power-surge-leads-g20-with-89-renewable-electricity/[/URL].
[U]The "Unquantifiable" Billions earned by China's Solar Firms:[/U]
Admittedly, your post on the loses by China's solar firms was a good post and got me thinking some more on that front. Ultimately, this is what I realized:
[LIST]That while it's true they've [i]lost $60 billion (bn) in 2024/25[/i], what isn't reported is that for all those TWh of solar panels they've exported to countries like Brazil, Latin America, Africa, Middle-East and South Asia, is the [i][b]recurring revenue in billions of dollars,[/b][/i] saved in oil, gas and diesel fuel, by these countries and their adoption of clean solar energy.[/LIST][LIST]Just look at the billions (even trillions), your boneheaded MAGA Fuhrer and crazy Bibi's U.S.,Israel/Iran war, has cost the world.[/LIST][LIST]You apparently care nothing for the billions (maybe trillions when all is said and done), that your corrupt MAGA Fuhrer, is costing American taxpayers [url]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/14/iran-war-cost-us-taxpayer-trillion-harvard.html[/url][/LIST]But just take Pakistan for example. Analysts report that the Pakistan solar revolution, has soften the impact of the [I]U.S.-Israel/IRAN war.[/I] Since 2018, Pakistan has saved $12 billion in oil and gas imports, as of Feb 2026. But due to the war, doubling in price of fossil fuels and shipping insurance, [B]Pakistan will save a further $6.3 billion[/B] by the end of the year. [URL]https://www.geo.tv/latest/656048-pakistans-solar-boom-limits-exposure-to-middle-east-energy-turmoil[/URL]
So despite your fossil fuel rhetoric and propaganda take, on the Pakistan solar revolution and your article's $60 bn loss by Chinese solar firms, it is the "unreported" and "untold" recurring cost savings in the multi-billions, like Pakistan's $18 bn in savings, that play-out in the various countries around the world, that benefit from Chinese solar fuel cells.
[U]Chinese Firms "Value-Added" Solar:[/U]
IMHO, if you do the accounting (and maybe I will at some point), with regards to all of these countries, that have save billions in fossil fuel costs, due to their adoption of solar, it is a [I][b]massive "unquantifiable" and intangible [u]credit[/u][/b][/I] on Chinese solar firms' balance sheets, that is woefully overlooked.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3061776]China is not the most polluting nation in the world. Oh wait, you acknowledge that it is. Then you twirl around again and say the USA is the nation that HAD polluted the most. And? We live in the now and in the now, the USA has been polluting the world a whole lot less while China is polluting a whole lot more.[/QUOTE]Elvis you selfish ingrate. You sir are an American white male. Compared to everyone else on the planet you started life with a big head start. Now you, and I, must pay for the sins of all the white males who preceded us.
It will cost about $275 trillion to get to net zero carbon by 2050 according to McKinsey:
[URL]https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/media-center/the-anatomy-of-the-net-zero-transition[/URL]
Since the USA, run by white males, "is the nation that HAD polluted the most," it falls upon us to clean up this mess. Indians and Chinese and all the rest certainly don't have the money.
Then of course there's the issue of reparations to Black Americans. At a minimum we should pay what San Francisco lawmakers voted to give each black adult: $5 million plus $97,000 per year, plus tax and debt relief, and a house for $1. If a person lives, say, 50 years that's about another $5 million just for the 97,000 a year. So let's round to $12 million per aggrieved Black American. Since there are about 35 million black American adults, that's another $420 trillion.
[URL]https://abc7news.com/post/san-francisco-lawmakers-vote-create-reparations-fund-black-residents-initial-funding/18293649/[/URL]
Finally there's the issue of the lands the White Man stole from the native American, while killing many with guns and diseases. It falls on you and me to make that right. We have to give them back the land. They sold Manhattan for about 60 guilders worth of goods in 1626, so maybe we can get it back on the cheap, say $25 trillion.
Adding it all up, that's $275 trillion + $420 trillion + $25 trillion = $720 trillion. There are 97 million of us, American men and boys who are white. So that's $7. 4 million each of us owe. Let's cough it up and make the world a better place.
We can give a chunk of it to Pakistan, provided they use it to buy solar panels from China like Spidy wants. You sure as hell don't want them spending those dollars to buy LNG from the USA. They'll probably want to do that to generate base load power, but fuck that. It would just dig us in deeper. We'd have to pay trillions more to get the world to net zero carbon.
Undoubtedly you're going to come up with excuses. Like maybe you're one of the 1% of American taxpayers who pay 40% of the income tax and you're already paying a lot more than your fair share. Well, man up. Get another job. Economize. Sell your fancy car and get a clunker. Remember Dave Ramsey, rice and beans, beans and rice.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061862]When reality doesn't agree with your narrative you nitpick. Or threaten to RTM me for an attempt at humor. Elvis is right, it's your religion. I won't try to enlighten you anymore. I tried that with a Mormon once and it ended up the same way this has.[/QUOTE][B]1.[/B] Confucius say -- [I]"The man who asks a question is a fool for a minute, the man who does not ask is a fool for life."[/I].
"Attempt at humor", LOL! Does the deranged MAGA cult, ChatGOP idolization and fossil fuels religious zealots, ring-a-bell for you MAGA suckers?
[NOPARSE]Your emissions nonsense and bullshit thinking, isn't so called "enlightenment"...it just the same bullshit, you've been trying to cover up, ever since you posted that utter crap about U.S. emissions, [/NOPARSE]here, [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3061520&viewfull=1#post3061520[/URL] and I said this:
[QUOTE=Spidy;3061540]But allow me to add some sanitary reasoning, to your last post, since you still seem to think, total energy is somehow meaningful, without the proper context.
Using your own asinine and misplaced logic, does that mean, that when China emits more energy, but emits less CO2 (27th), than the U.S. (16th), that it is because of the tons of dirty "beautiful clean coal" being burnt in China? This is the absurdity of your logic...Duh![/QUOTE][B]2.[/B] Confucius often reminded young Grasshopper, [I]"If you provide computer AI, with smelly garbage info in, don't expect fragrant roses out."[/I] (Not Confucius, but apt!
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3061862]A parting comment, you should ask ChatGPT or Gemini the question “Is the ratio of CO2 emissions to energy consumed higher for the USA or China?” [/QUOTE]LOL! Sure Tiny 12, and then perhaps you can then ask your precious ChatGOP to [I]"To take that ratio and divide it, by the Mr.Fusion home energy reactor + 2 banana peels + 1 beer can X the Flux Capacitor (1.2 GW) constant, and then determine if the energy ratio is higher for the USA or China?” [/I].
Notice how, after posting your bogus equation, I asked one simple question, [I][b]"Show me where it's used in industry?"[/b][/I] and neither your or ChatGOP could provide one. Otherwise once again, you're just making shit up!
[B]New Rules: [/B]
The Latest New Rules from Bill Maher, for people that rely too much on AI / ChatGOP, had me fallin' out of my chair laughing. [I]Spoiler alert...it doesn't end well for the ChatGOP keyboard warriors![/I] [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5SYm4J4utQ[/URL].
[QUOTE=NewRules-BillMaher]"AI has already convinced people to kill themselves, because it's also such a brown noser, that if you tell it, you want to commit suicide, it says, "Great idea, Bill!" (AUDIENCE CHUCKLING).
[b]It's a bullshitting sycophant[/b] that is seducing everyone with flattery, including (AUDIENCE CHUCKLES) ...by the way, anyone who feels superior to Trump because, well, you know, he can't do anything without being told how great he is by some ass kisser. Yeah, just like you! " [url]https://youtu.be/w5SYm4J4utQ?t=238[/url] [/QUOTE][B]3.[/B] Confucius say, [I]"Knowledge without practice is useless. Practice without knowledge is dangerous."[/I]
-
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;3062368]The Morningstar piece was written by a subscriber to Doomberg, an energy news letter ranked #1 or #2 of all financial news letters on substack. Unlike the traditional media, the Doomberg authors have skewered the green energy nonsense unlike any other site.
Thing is that I and suspect you are not anti-green energy. It is not green, so alternative is a better word, and I and I suspect you are not anti-alternative energy; we just want our tax dollars put into alternative energy when it makes sense.[/QUOTE]
Thanks Elvis. I subscribed to the previews and will upgrade if it keeps my attention.
Absolutely, I'm very pro alternative energy. I just believe in free markets. If you want to give renewables a boost, then impose a carbon tax, but only if it's set at a reasonable level, doesn't affect our exports, and the money is used to reduce the deficit or lower the federal income tax. Let companies and industries and technologies compete to find the best solutions. The Democrat way is to blindly throw lots of money at the problem, a lot of it going towards corporate pork. In other words, fuck the taxpayer and channel the money to crony capitalists.
Our native Texas, as you know, has one of the most renewable-heavy large grids in the world. In fact "Petro State" Texas generates a much higher % of its electricity from wind and solar than "Electrostate" China. And a much higher percentage than the USA as a whole. And we pay less for electricity than the nationwide average. Renewables work great under the right conditions.
Parts of Texas benefit from windier and sunnier than average conditions. But we did a lot of other things right. Unlike many other places, we have a true free market in electricity. We invested heavily in the grid, including transmission lines to get wind and solar power from West Texas and the Panhandle to population centers. In most of rural Texas (i.e. God's Country) utilities and power developers for the most part don't have to put up with intractable permitting headaches and "not in my backyard mentality." And regulation and taxes aren't overbearing. Blue states with their overbearing, intrusive, inefficient, wasteful governments can't match this.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;3062368]And the reason the USA is in the best position right now is because the red states have tuned out the greenies and developed on our own resources. There is shale oil and gas in Europe and in China. China just cannot figure out how to access it, and Europe does not appear that interested in doing so.[/QUOTE]
Absolutely.
[QUOTE=Elvis 2008;3062368]On a personal note, I have been trying to get alternative energy working on my RV. For free energy, it is crazy expensive. I was afraid of overusing the generator and talked to the shop about how long the generators last, and they told me they last a long time, and the diesel ones even more so. Thing is my current generator cannot run two AC units, and that is what I want. The one AC unit is not enough to keep the RV cool in the Texas heat.
So I bought the most energy efficient AC unit for about $1500 as a second one and $3000 worth of batteries to run it. That should keep the AC going for 12 hours. Thing is I was next looking at solar panels. It looks like it is going to take 8 hours to charge them now this versus 2 or 3 with the generator or plugging into an AC socket on the wall. At this point, I am like, why do you really want to buy said panels? Unless I wanted to brag about being off grid, and off grid means using the generator, I really would not be.[/QUOTE] With the surface area you've got on a RV for solar cells, I don't know how you could keep cool on a summer day when the sun's shining, let alone five or six hours into a hot summer night. Yeah, really the only good solution is a generator that uses gasoline, propane or diesel, if you don't have an electrical outlet.
P.S. Did you see Spidy's now saying China's the #1 consumer of energy in the world and [b]#27 in CO2 emissions[/b]? ROTFLMAO at the bold text! Also he appears to believe that carbon intensity of energy consumption is something I pulled out of thin air, when it's used by the IEA, governments, electric utilities, major oil companies, ESG funds etc.
-
We were nearly gotten rid of the schizophrene putting messe in worldwide economics with inflation for us. Could have been a great day. Look forward next time, to have a better life for billions on our planet, without him in his delirium and trying to rob everybody.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3062979]With the surface area you've got on a RV for solar cells, I don't know how you could keep cool on a summer day when the sun's shining, let alone five or six hours into a hot summer night. Yeah, really the only good solution is a generator that uses gasoline, propane or diesel, if you don't have an electrical outlet.[/QUOTE]Well, I bought 12,000 watt hours of battery packs, and the AC units have gotten more efficient. If you look at the table on the 7:50 mark of this video, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CXCWdxj22Q[/URL], you can see how much more efficient ACs have gotten. I bought the Gree Eco cool unit, so at 1100 watts per hour, I think I should be able to get 11 hours out of the AC but I am not sure.
The battery pack can be charged with up to 1600 watts of solar power. I figure to charge them up via the generator or grid and use the solar just so they stay charged. If I run out of roof space and really wanted solar, I could get a panel to put on the ground, but I keep asking myself why I want solar panels anyway. It is so much cheaper just to plug in, and in all honesty, I will probably just turn the generator on or plug the battery pack in. It is just less hassle and short term cost. I think the solar panels are going to be trouble.
But if I want two AC units in then the generator probably cannot handle it. It probably could with a lower watt AC unit but I wanted something to keep me really cool.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3062979]Our native Texas, as you know, has one of the most renewable-heavy large grids in the world. In fact "Petro State" Texas generates a much higher % of its electricity from wind and solar than "Electrostate" China. And a much higher percentage than the USA as a whole. And we pay less for electricity than the nationwide average. Renewables work great under the right conditions.
P.S. Did you see Spidy's now saying China's the #1 consumer of energy in the world and #27 in CO2 emissions? ROTFLMAO at the bold text! Also he appears to believe that carbon intensity of energy consumption is something I pulled out of thin air, when it's used by the IEA, governments, electric utilities, major oil companies, ESG funds etc.[/QUOTE]If Spidy is not a paid shill for China, he ought to be. BYD has come to Colombia, and I was looking at how much their and other Chinese cars cost in Mexico. I had been seeing BYDs all over the place. Thing is that I really did not like the way they look. I liked the Geelys better. Geely actually owns Volvo and Trump has said as long as China builds cars in the USA, they are welcome to compete and Geely is best suited to do that because Volvo is here already.
I was shocked then when I saw that Buffett had dumped all his BYD stock. [URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/warren-buffett-just-sold-entire-113917609.html[/URL].
He made a killing on it, and the headlines are he dumped it because of tariffs, but I am not so sure. They weren't selling BYDs in the USA yet.
Then I saw this: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tS_fJJxMjn4[/URL]
If you click on the part of the above video under the section, the rot underneath, this is more of a reason as to why I see Buffett selling: tons of unsold cars, lying about debt, poor working conditions.
This is the same story we keep hearing with China: ghost cities, solar panels not being used, overbuilt car capacity. It kind of reminds me of Japan in the 80's and how everyone thought they were going to take over the world too, but they faded to complete stagnation due to their debt.
At some point, this debt is going to come home to roost for China. The USA has its issues but we are more honest about our debt. Not totally honest but way more honest. Hell, China's electrical generation and China as electrostate is totally BS propaganda to me.
That $37 trillion in debt the USA has is problematic until one looks at assets. [URL]https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/gas/us-energy-facts/[/URL]
The USGS estimates that unconventional USA Oil shale resources hold 2. 6 trillion barrels of oil, with about 1 trillion barrels that are considered recoverable under current economic and technological conditions.
At today's prices, that would be around $100 trillion in assets. Of course, you have to get it out and private industry would take its cut, but it makes that debt number look much more palatable.
And greenies like Spidy do not want us to develop it? LOL. You got to be kidding me!
I repeat: if he is not getting paid by China (and Russia for that matter), he ought to be.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3063087]Well, I bought 12,000 watt hours of battery packs, and the AC units have gotten more efficient. If you look at the table on the 7:50 mark of this video, [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CXCWdxj22Q[/URL], you can see how much more efficient ACs have gotten. I bought the Gree Eco cool unit, so at 1100 watts per hour, I think I should be able to get 11 hours out of the AC but I am not sure.
The battery pack can be charged with up to 1600 watts of solar power. I figure to charge them up via the generator or grid and use the solar just so they stay charged. If I run out of roof space and really wanted solar, I could get a panel to put on the ground, but I keep asking myself why I want solar panels anyway. It is so much cheaper just to plug in, and in all honesty, I will probably just turn the generator on or plug the battery pack in. It is just less hassle and short term cost. I think the solar panels are going to be trouble.
But if I want two AC units in then the generator probably cannot handle it. It probably could with a lower watt AC unit but I wanted something to keep me really cool.
If Spidy is not a paid shill for China, he ought to be. BYD has come to Colombia, and I was looking at how much their and other Chinese cars cost in Mexico. I had been seeing BYDs all over the place. Thing is that I really did not like the way they look. I liked the Geelys better. Geely actually owns Volvo and Trump has said as long as China builds cars in the USA, they are welcome to compete and Geely is best suited to do that because Volvo is here already.
I was shocked then when I saw that Buffett had dumped all his BYD stock. [URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/news/warren-buffett-just-sold-entire-113917609.html[/URL].
He made a killing on it, and the headlines are he dumped it because of tariffs, but I am not so sure. They weren't selling BYDs in the USA yet.
Then I saw this: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tS_fJJxMjn4[/URL]
If you click on the part of the above video under the section, the rot underneath, this is more of a reason as to why I see Buffett selling: tons of unsold cars, lying about debt, poor working conditions.
This is the same story we keep hearing with China: ghost cities, solar panels not being used, overbuilt car capacity. It kind of reminds me of Japan in the 80's and how everyone thought they were going to take over the world too, but they faded to complete stagnation due to their debt.
At some point, this debt is going to come home to roost for China. The USA has its issues but we are more honest about our debt. Not totally honest but way more honest. Hell, China's electrical generation and China as electrostate is totally BS propaganda to me.
That $37 trillion in debt the USA has is problematic until one looks at assets. [URL]https://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/gas/us-energy-facts/[/URL]
The USGS estimates that unconventional USA Oil shale resources hold 2. 6 trillion barrels of oil, with about 1 trillion barrels that are considered recoverable under current economic and technological conditions.
At today's prices, that would be around $100 trillion in assets. Of course, you have to get it out and private industry would take its cut, but it makes that debt number look much more palatable.
And greenies like Spidy do not want us to develop it? LOL. You got to be kidding me!
I repeat: if he is not getting paid by China (and Russia for that matter), he ought to be.[/QUOTE]Hi Elvis,
I hope your RV set up works. Please come back and let us know how it went, that would be interesting.
Yeah, look at Norway. It's doing its best to develop renewables, but it doesn't kneecap its oil and gas industry, like what many Democrats want to do. I don't understand the rationale. To the extent USA Oil is removed from the market, it will be replaced by oil from Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Russia, Iran, etc. What's the sense in eliminating American jobs, for the sake of sanctimonious grandstanding? A lot of my friends and some family work in oil and gas BTW.
Very interesting video, especially the part about the subsidies and other support BYD got from the government. I was listening to an interview on CNBC today with BYD's #2, who was hired when the company just had 20 people and was a $300,000 startup. She said they employ 1 million people worldwide. If I'm not mistaken she said they employ 120,000 people in R&D and file an average of over 50 patents a day! Incredible. No doubt they wouldn't be where they are now, which is still a pretty impressive place to be even given recent stumbles and shady dealings, without lots and lots of green pork. Which I still argue is not a good thing.
Still, Spidy's enthusiasm for Chinese EV's probably is justified, in the sense that they've passed up the rest of the world in terms of value and technology. And they fit into China's energy plan. China's going to continue generating lots of electricity, over 50% of what's on its grid from coal, which emits about 2 X the carbon per GW-hour as natural gas. (Aside: Please note that I'm using a metric here, carbon intensity of energy production, that Spidy says is not used in industry. Sorry about that!) And increasing amounts from renewables. China has lots of coal, as well as hydro, solar and wind. On the other hand it has to import lots of oil. So EV's are a logical part of their energy plan. China would rather use domestically produced coal, and renewables, to power vehicles, instead of imported oil. That provides energy security.
As you say, the Chinese don't have anywhere near our technical proficiency in exploiting unconventional oil and natural gas. And the quality of their resource isn't as good either. Undoubtedly they wish they were in our shoes. Imagine how much clearer the sky would be over Beijing if they had the natural gas reserves we do. I wonder if Spidy's ever been to Beijing? Or any other Chinese city? If not that would be an eye opener for him.
Something's squirrelly with the Institute for Energy's resource estimates. They must be for oil shale, where the oil would be extracted mostly through surface mining and processing of the shale, or by in-situ heating. This is mostly not economic at recent prices, although I guess it might be if you expect the price of oil to remain above $100/ barrel. Still, you're correct, there's a lot of unconventional oil, that's not bound in oil shales, left to be recovered in the USA.
I believe the actual federal debt held by the public, once you strip out treasury holdings by the Social Security trust fund, the Fed, etc. , is "only" about $30 trillion. That's about equal to GDP. When debt gets to 100% of GDP for a developed country, you start to worry. (You'd worry at a lot lower levels for developing countries.) You get to 140%, and we're on a trajectory to get there, and you're getting to Italy and Greece territory.
Japan has been an exception, because most of the debt is held domestically, interest rates have been super low, and the central bank (like our Fed) has a lot of power to make rates whatever it wants them to be.
You're right about China, when you add in huge debts run up by local governments, including their off balance sheet debt, and their state owned enterprises. China's debt, like Japan's, is mostly held domestically. And China keeps interest rates very low.
A lot of USA Debt however is held by foreigners. And if they dump it, I think we're screwed. I'm not sure though, that's above my pay grade. I will say that the federal government is paying around $1 trillion a year in interest expense, or over 3% of GDP, and that's not a good thing. Federal revenues run about $4.8 trillion a year, and federal expenditures about $6.5 trillion. The $1.8 trillion difference is the federal deficit.
Here's an analogy. If you had a buddy who made $48,000 a year in income, after tax, would you loan him $300,000, knowing he's going to have to pay you $10,000 in interest on the loan, without paying back any principal? One added piece of information, while he's making $48,000 a year, he's spending $65,000 a year. He probably could repay you if he set his mind to it. But I wouldn't count on it happening.
-
Yes Biden is still alive after his illness
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3063005]We were nearly gotten rid of the schizophrene putting messe in worldwide economics with inflation for us. Could have been a great day. Look forward next time, to have a better life for billions on our planet, without him in his delirium and trying to rob everybody.[/QUOTE]Yes Biden is still alive after his illness but his inflation still haunts the USA to this day. Don't worry. Trump has the Biden inflation down about 70% and it will get even better after defeat of Iran.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: Petro Idiocy self-debunked!
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3062979]Thanks Elvis. ...
P.S. Did you see Spidy's now saying China's the #1 consumer of energy in the world and [b]#27 in CO2 emissions[/b]? ROTFLMAO at the bold text! Also he appears to believe that carbon intensity of energy consumption is something I pulled out of thin air, when it's used by the IEA, governments, electric utilities, major oil companies, ESG funds etc.[/QUOTE]LOL! Yes, thanks again, for verifying the stupidity of your CO2 claims, arguments and dump assertions, I've so nicely debunked!
-
Does Canada know Canada?
[QUOTE=Canada;3062679]You know nothing about Canadians. Alberta likes Trump a hell of a lot more than Carney. Once again you just spew made up crap that isn't true. You read something in a far left fake news site and then continue to spread their lies. How long have you been a Canadian? Once again you show the stupidity of posting a link from BBC fake news. They are worse than CNN. Shows a lot about you.[/QUOTE]LOL! Canada's right-wing [B]Conservatives blow a 27-pt lead,[/B] because of your MAGA Fuhrer! And is that the best you got, "fake news"?
BTW, is there a link to an article for your post, to verify and validate that MAGA diatribe and propaganda?
-
Yes, but.
[QUOTE=Canada;3063262]Yes Biden is still alive after his illness but his inflation still haunts the USA to this day. Don't worry. Trump has the Biden inflation down about 70% and it will get even better after defeat of Iran.[/QUOTE]We can all thank Trump for higher gas prices too. Talk about buy he got the whole planet stuck with high gas prices. The 60 days for this self imposed fiasco will soon run out. There's no chance in hell that Congress will approve ground troops in Iran.
Can someone explain why we are there in the first place? Oh, and how do new get out without looking weak? Thanks President Trump!
-
3 photos
Biden-Harris' Envy of the World Economy. Then along came Trump.
[QUOTE=Canada;3063262]Yes Biden is still alive after his illness but his inflation still haunts the USA to this day. Don't worry. Trump has the Biden inflation down about 70% and it will get even better after defeat of Iran.[/QUOTE]There was much optimism on the expectation that the easily affordable momentary 9. 1% rate of inflation due to Trump's Pandemic and not nearly as high as many other countries, along with their remarkable private-sector job gains, virtually unheard of in most other countries, would continue its historically positive trajectories well into the next generation.
But then along came Trump with his across-the-board tariffs, a repeat of his 1st term failed trade wars with everyone, the skyrocketing American business bankruptcies and massive private-sector job layoffs, the classic Repub crap overall jobs creation numbers in the wake of a classic Repub Big Beautiful Tax Breaks and Corporate Welfare For Billionaires and Fuck Everyone Else Legislation, his higher and increasing Rate of Inflation vs the trajectory and where it was in the final couple of Biden-Harris years, his unprovoked and failing War of Choice in Iran, his utterly incoherent blithering blathering between prolonged Liquor Cabinet Meeting naps, all of which he expects someone else to fix in "two weeks" and on and on.
Which has still not totally crashed the Envy of the World Economy he inherited from Biden-Harris. Yet. But he is definitely working on it. And he has 2 1/2 more years to accomplish that decades and decades' long apparently contractually-obligated goal of every Repub so-called president of the past 100 years or so; to crash the USA economy and wipe out as many American jobs and household wealth as possible.
Fun Fact: Combining the approximately 3 Million private-sector USA jobs Trump wiped out in his first disastrous term with the so far piddling 1 Million or so that have been created since he took office this time around, it is entirely probable that Donald J. Trump's classic Repub economic policies and stewardship as a so-called president will not have created One. Single. Net. Gain private-sector job by the midterm elections in his sixth year in office. Not one. In fact, if he continues to behave as he has always behaved in his life, it is entirely possible that there will not have been One. Single. Net. Gain private-sector job created under the entire Trump so-called presidency by 12 Noon on January 20,2029. After TWO terms!
Which will be a Worst Economic / Jobs Creation Record for Trump than any USA president in history, far surpassing that of Repubs Hoover, Eisenhower, Bush1, Bush2 and even Trump's own previous Worst Ever record! Of course, that is aside from the millions of people, mostly children, his and Musk's policies and stewardship will have mass murdered by then.
[B]The envy of the world.
Special reports - Oct 19th 2024.
The American economy has left other rich countries in the dust. Expect that to continue, argue Simon Rabinovitch and Henry Curr[/B]
[URL]https://www.economist.com/special-report/2024-10-19[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3063262]Yes Biden is still alive after his illness but his inflation still haunts the USA to this day. Don't worry. Trump has the Biden inflation down about 70% and it will get even better after defeat of Iran.[/QUOTE]Biden was much less dangerous for our world than schizophrene Trump making big inflation, even now in USA. I think billions people on our planet would follow me on this. At the moment, real facts are Trump is failing versus Iran and preferred to stop war, after just spending billions and making messe with inflation in the world. I was disappointed once more he was not shot. Look forward next.
-
Does Canada really know Canada?
[QUOTE=Canada;3062679]You know nothing about Canadians. Alberta likes Trump a hell of a lot more than Carney. Once again you just spew made up crap that isn't true. You read something in a far left fake news site and then continue to spread their lies. How long have you been a Canadian? Once again you show the stupidity of posting a link from BBC fake news. They are worse than CNN. Shows a lot about you.[/QUOTE]LOL! First you claim, all of Canada loves your MAGA Fuhrer and now its just Alberta?
Well let me do the math for you. If Canada has a population of about 41 million, and Alberta has a population of about 5 million, that means about 12% to 13% of Canadians [B](according to your own testimony above),[/B] is indeed fewer than 1-in-5 Canadians, that love your MAGA Fuhrer, as indicted by the article I posted here: [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3061904&viewfull=1#post3061904[/URL]
So how is it, you claim "fake news" about the article I posted, and yet your own post and words, verify the validation of the article? [B]Fewer Than One-in-Five Canadians View Trump Favorably,[/B] Nov 6th, 2025. [URL]https://researchco.ca/2025/11/06/people-canada/[/URL]
How is it MAGA can't even do simply math? Well thanks for the confirming the article's validity, when it's coming straight from the horse's mouth, as it were, that [B][i]"...most Canadians do indeed dislike your MAGA Fuhrer"[/i][/B]
-
You quoted BBC
[QUOTE=Spidy;3063391]LOL! First you claim, all of Canada loves your MAGA Fuhrer and now its just Alberta?
Well let me do the math for you. If Canada has a population of about 41 million, and Alberta has a population of about 5 million, that means about 12% to 13% of Canadians [B](according to your own testimony above),[/B] is indeed fewer than 1-in-5 Canadians, that love your MAGA Fuhrer, as indicted by the article I posted here: [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3061904&viewfull=1#post3061904[/URL]
So how is it, you claim "fake news" about the article I posted, and yet your own post and words, verify the validation of the article? [B]Fewer Than One-in-Five Canadians View Trump Favorably,[/B] Nov 6th, 2025. [URL]https://researchco.ca/2025/11/06/people-canada/[/URL]
How is it MAGA can't even do simply math? Well thanks for the confirming the article's validity, when it's coming straight from the horse's mouth, as it were, that [B][i]"...most Canadians do indeed dislike your MAGA Fuhrer"[/i][/B][/QUOTE]You quoted BBC. That proves your post was fake.
-
Trump is not failing in Iran
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3063309]Biden was much less dangerous for our world than schizophrene Trump making big inflation, even now in USA. I think billions people on our planet would follow me on this. At the moment, real facts are Trump is failing versus Iran and preferred to stop war, after just spending billions and making messe with inflation in the world. I was disappointed once more he was not shot. Look forward next.[/QUOTE]Trump is not failing in Iran. He has weakened Iran to a breaking point. Biden and Obama strengthened Iran by flooding them with cash. All the presidents in the past 30 years knew that someone would ultimately have to take out Iran but nobody had the balls to do it until Trump. Even Hillary said if she was elected that she would need to do it. Possibly Biden didn't support it because he didn't know Iran was a terrorist country. Probably didn't even know where Iran was. Trump inflation at 3% at the high is still 70% less than Biden inflation high. It is a small price to pay for Trump saving the world. You may not want to pay a little more for gas for a few months to ensure your kids and grandkids are in a safer world but most people do. You aren't worried that Trump will fail and destroy USA. You are worried that he will succeed and make the USA great and he will destroy the democrats political ideology.
-
Unbelievable
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3063303]There was much optimism on the expectation that the easily affordable momentary 9. 1% rate of inflation due to Trump's Pandemic and not nearly as high as many other countries, along with their remarkable private-sector job gains, virtually unheard of in most other countries, would continue its historically positive trajectories well into the next generation.
But then along came Trump with his across-the-board tariffs, a repeat of his 1st term failed trade wars with everyone, the skyrocketing American business bankruptcies and massive private-sector job layoffs, the classic Repub crap overall jobs creation numbers in the wake of a classic Repub Big Beautiful Tax Breaks and Corporate Welfare For Billionaires and Fuck Everyone Else Legislation, his higher and increasing Rate of Inflation vs the trajectory and where it was in the final couple of Biden-Harris years, his unprovoked and failing War of Choice in Iran, his utterly incoherent blithering blathering between prolonged Liquor Cabinet Meeting naps, all of which he expects someone else to fix in "two weeks" and on and on.
Which has still not totally crashed the Envy of the World Economy he inherited from Biden-Harris. Yet. But he is definitely working on it.[/QUOTE]Unbelievable that you can continue to post these lies. Biden didn't even know he was president the last 2 years when the auto pen was running the country.
-
Explained?
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3063281]We can all thank Trump for higher gas prices too. Talk about buy he got the whole planet stuck with high gas prices. The 60 days for this self imposed fiasco will soon run out. There's no chance in hell that Congress will approve ground troops in Iran.
Can someone explain why we are there in the first place? Oh, and how do new get out without looking weak? Thanks President Trump![/QUOTE]If you need it explained then you must be a Democrat. Educated people don't need it explained.
-
Uh, MAGA Math ends with BBC?
[QUOTE=Canada;3063429]You quoted BBC. That proves your post was fake.[/QUOTE]LOL! Not that you have one iota or clue, with regards to what I posted, so I just chalk it up to MAGA illiteracy and unable to do simple math.
-
3 photos
Not even BBC? LOL
[QUOTE=Canada;3063432]Trump is not failing in Iran. He has weakened Iran to a breaking point. Biden and Obama strengthened Iran by flooding them with cash. All the presidents in the past 30 years knew that someone would ultimately have to take out Iran but nobody had the balls to do it until Trump. Even Hillary said if she was elected that she would need to do it. Possibly Biden didn't support it because he didn't know Iran was a terrorist country. Probably didn't even know where Iran was. Trump inflation at 3% at the high is still 70% less than Biden inflation high. It is a small price to pay for Trump saving the world. You may not want to pay a little more for gas for a few months to ensure your kids and grandkids are in a safer world but most people do. You aren't worried that Trump will fail and destroy USA. You are worried that he will succeed and make the USA great and he will destroy the democrats political ideology.[/QUOTE]You quoted no one. You linked to nothing.
Must be nice to live in the Trump / MAGA World of Lies and Fantasies. Trump would weep like an infant if he knew the best case study of True Trump Derangement Syndrome lives in Canada, can't vote in the USA, not legally anyway, doesn't pay USA taxes for him to squander on himself, his Crime Family and his billionaire Repub Party donors and presumably doesn't have a USA Citizen son to register for the draft and hopefully be sent to Iran someday to serve as cannon fodder for his Pay Back Big Favors To Netanyahu and Muslims War in Iran.
Did I mention Melania must have loved the taste of grilled baby so much that she and Donnie are opening a chain of Baby Bites fast food outlets? They are looking for investors right now. From any country. Even Canada.
Really. Swear to god. It is such common knowledge there is no need to post a link or quote.
-
Information
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3063456]You quoted no one. You linked to nothing.
Must be nice to live in the Trump / MAGA World of Lies and Fantasies. Trump would weep like an infant if he knew the best case study of True Trump Derangement Syndrome lives in Canada, can't vote in the USA, not legally anyway, doesn't pay USA taxes for him to squander on himself, his Crime Family and his billionaire Repub Party donors and presumably doesn't have a USA Citizen son to register for the draft and hopefully be sent to Iran someday to serve as cannon fodder for his Pay Back Big Favors To Netanyahu and Muslims War in Iran.
Did I mention Melania must have loved the taste of grilled baby so much that she and Donnie are opening a chain of Baby Bites fast food outlets? They are looking for investors right now. From any country. Even Canada.
Really. Swear to god. It is such common knowledge there is no need to post a link or quote.[/QUOTE]If you can't acknowledge that Iran is a terrorist country and a danger to the world then you must be a terrorist supporter yourself. There are hundreds of posts by past presidents and congress both republican and democrat who publicly called out this terrorist country. If you aren't t smart enough to google it then you have bigger problems in life. Any person that supports terrorism over Trump administration has serious problems in life. I feel sorry for you.
-
3 photos
Here, let me help you with that
[QUOTE=Canada;3063572]If you can't acknowledge that Iran is a terrorist country and a danger to the world then you must be a terrorist supporter yourself. There are hundreds of posts by past presidents and congress both republican and democrat who publicly called out this terrorist country. If you aren't t smart enough to google it then you have bigger problems in life. Any person that supports terrorism over Trump administration has serious problems in life. I feel sorry for you.[/QUOTE]First, the AI Overview with substantiation links for how Trump lied to start his illegal Iran War with the only logical and supportable purpose being to Pay Back Netanyahu for squeezing out a fraction of a single percentage point swing among the Muslim Community of voters from their usual Dem candidate vote to the Repub candidate across the only three Swing States that mattered, PA, MI and WI, by stoking their antagonism for the Biden Administration by strategically delaying the May 2024 Biden-negotiated ceasefire until after the election. Had Netanyahu honored that ceasefire agreement before the 2024 election there is zero evidence that so much as one "winning" Electoral College vote for Trump would have come from any other demographic in any other states on any other issue. Trump owed Netanyahu a huge Pay Back favor.
Trump also owed major Pay Back favors to predominantly Muslim countries that, like Netanyahu, had pined for decades for a USA president stupid enough to plunge America into a War in Iran; Qatar for that sweet bribe of a $400 Million airliner, the UAE for that sweet bribe in the Billions of $ to bail out the Trump Crime Family's failing crypto venture, Saudi Arabia for that sweet bribe in the Billions to $ to Trump's son-in-law Jared and daughter Ivanka in an ongoing personal real estate deal clumsily disguised as some kind of "foreign policy" negotiations for the USA and others.
[QUOTE][b]How Trump lied to start his Iran War[/b]
+12
Critics and political opponents have accused President Trump of using a "litany of lies" and shifting justifications to initiate and sustain the 2026 Iran War, a conflict that reportedly began with unilateral U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in June 2025.
PBS
+2
[B]According to various fact-checks and congressional testimonies, the primary alleged falsehoods include:[/b]
Imminent Nuclear Threat: Trump claimed the war was necessary because an Iranian nuclear weapon was an "imminent threat". However, U.S. intelligence assessments and experts consistently stated that Iran was years away from producing a deliverable nuclear weapon, even after amassing enriched uranium following the U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA.
Missile Capabilities: Trump justified military action by claiming Iran was close to developing intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) capable of reaching the American homeland. Government assessments contradicted this, stating Iran was years away from such technology.
Blaming Iran for U.S. Errors: On the first day of the conflict, a U.S. Tomahawk missile mistakenly hit a girls' school in Minab, killing approximately 175 children. Trump publicly claimed the attack "was done by Iran," a statement later undermined by a preliminary U.S. military investigation confirming it was an American missile.
Claims of Success and Progress:
Nuclear Program Status: Trump repeatedly claimed U.S. strikes "obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities, yet his administration later used the ongoing nuclear threat as a reason to continue the war.
Regime Change: Trump claimed "regime change has occurred" because several top Iranian leaders were killed; however, the Islamic regime remains in power under a new, hardline Supreme Leader.
Economic Impact: Trump falsely stated the U.S. is "totally independent" of Middle Eastern oil and that the war has not impacted inflation, despite rising gas prices and a 0.3% month-over-month CPI increase in February 2026.
Fabricated Endorsements: Trump claimed all four living former presidents privately told him they wished they had attacked Iran as he did; aides for all four former presidents denied these conversations ever took place.
CNN
+10
Democrats on the House Armed Services Committee have characterized the war as a "strategic blunder" and accused the administration of misleading the public about the conflict's costsnow estimated at $25 billion and its true objectives.
PBS
+2
CNN
https://www.cnn.com
Fact check: Trumps barrage of false or unproven claims about the ...
Mar 17, 2026 BE President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House, on Monday. ... President Donald Trump continues to make false and unproven claims about the...
The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com
Opinion | Trump Is Hiding the Truth About the War in Iran - The New York Times
Mar 21, 2026 BE Trump wrote that you can say that those Media Outlets that generated it should be brought up on Charges for TREASON for the dissemination of false information!
CNN
https://www.cnn.com
Fact check: Trump makes false claims about the Iran war and his foreign policy record
Apr 6, 2026 BE By. Daniel Dale. Updated Apr 6, 2026, 4:49 PM ET Published Apr 6, 2026, 4:49 PM ET. PUBLISHED Apr 6, 2026, 4:49 PM ET. President Donald Trump arrives for a news...
The Conversation
https://theconversation.com
Trumps first term lies at the heart of escalation between Iran and Israel
Jun 20, BE The situation has changed since Trump's withdrawal. Israel's central justification for launching its attack against Iran on June 15 was the International Atomic...
PBSPBS NewsHour
https://www.pbs.org
5:54:24
WATCH: Hegseth, Caine testify for the 1st time since start of Iran war in House ...
PBS
https://www.pbs.org
Fact-checking statements made by Trump to justify U.S. strikes on Iran
Feb 28, 2026 BE "Instead, they attempted to rebuild their nuclear program and to continue developing long range missiles that can now threaten our very good friends and allies ...
The New Yorker
https://www.newyorker.com
Donald Trumps Case for War Fails to Mention How to Win It
Apr 2, 2026 BE In his address on Wednesday night, he repeated much of this, except he denied that regime change had ever been the goal of the operation, while also claiming, a...
The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com
Nobody else is responsible: Trump to blame for Iran crisis, ex-CIA ...
Mar 22, 2026 BE Panetta said: When he or those around him started publishing pictures of football games, raising money by using pictures of our dead coming home at Dover [air ...
CNN
https://www.cnn.com
Fact check: Trumps latest false, unproven and contradictory claims ...
Mar 10, 2026 BE If Iran had somehow obtained Tomahawks through some illicit means, that still wouldn't mean it could use them. Jenzen-Jones said he agreed with a New York Times...
The New Yorker
https://www.newyorker.com
The First Casualty of Trumps War in Iran Was the Truth
Mar 21, 2026 BE And yet, as the late Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld once blithely said, in the thick of America's catastrophic misadventure in Iraq, Stuff happens. The Sup...
YouTubeFRANCE 24 English
https://www.youtube.com
4:36
Fact-checking Trump's address on the war in Iran FRANCE 24 English
The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com
'A litany of lies': Trump's rambling primetime Iran address sparks backlash
Apr 2, 2026 BE It is the exact opposite of his claim that with the deal 'Iran would now have an arsenal of nuclear weapons. ' FALSE, he wrote. If the deal were still in plac...
Time Magazine
https://time.com
In Hostile Hearing, Democrats Accuse Hegseth of Misleading Public on Iran War Progress
Apr 30, 2026 BE Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth arrived on Capitol Hill on Wednesday facing what was supposed to be a budget hearing. Instead, he confronted something the Trump ...
Slate
https://slate.com
Trump's First Speech About the War With Iran Explained Absolutely ...
Apr 2, 2026 BE Trump's Boxed Himself Into a Trap on Iran ... Claim: The United States imports almost no oil through the Hormuz Strait. We don't need it. And the countries...
Fortune
https://fortune.com
A strategic blunder: Democrats confront Hegseth as the Iran wars price tag hits $25 billion
Apr 30, 2026 BE Democrats press Hegseth over reasons for war. Wednesday's hearing stretched nearly six hours as Democrats and some Republicans questioned Hegseth over the war a...[/QUOTE]And now a specific link without a pay wall obstruction that does a good job of culling together many but not all of the dozens of other credible media sources for how Trump lied America into his failing Repub forever War of Choice in the Middle East:
[B]Trumps First Speech About the War With Iran Explained Absolutely Nothing
Lets take stock of just how much Trump is distorting the truth about this war.[/B]
[URL]https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/04/trump-iran-war-news-speech-lies.html[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3063456]
Did I mention Melania must have loved the taste of grilled baby so much that she and Donnie are opening a chain of Baby Bites fast food outlets? They are looking for investors right now. From any country. Even Canada.
Really. Swear to god. It is such common knowledge there is no need to post a link or quote.[/QUOTE]This is a natural progression for a person with TDS who goes untreated. First you blame the COVID virus on him and next he's hawking baby bites.
That sounds yummy but are they deep fried or grilled? I avoid fried foods.
Well the offer I made to the Marquesa is open to you. The Church of Tiny is here to help. I conquered my TDS and I can help you conquer yours. My patented technique is similar to the ending of 1984, if you remember the book. At the end of the therapy you'll imagine a giant Trump dressed like a superhero protecting you from all kinds of threats — katooeys, vermin, you name it.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3063125]Here's an analogy. If you had a buddy who made $48,000 a year in income, after tax, would you loan him $300,000, knowing he's going to have to pay you $10,000 in interest on the loan, without paying back any principal? One added piece of information, while he's making $48,000 a year, he's spending $65,000 a year. He probably could repay you if he set his mind to it. But I wouldn't count on it happening.[/QUOTE]This is the gold bug question, and you are leaving out two key components. How much does the buddy have in assets? And what yield on the debt am I getting?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3063125]A lot of USA Debt however is held by foreigners. And if they dump it, I think we're screwed. I'm not sure though, that's above my pay grade.[/QUOTE]This is more of the gold bug / crypto fear mongering. When it comes to the political, I am not that thrilled by Mish Shedlock, but he is much stronger economically. Anyway, here is what he posted on China dumping treasuries, [URL]https://mishtalk.com/economics/is-china-selling-us-treasuries-ai-view-consensus-view-and-the-right-view/[/URL]
China is masking Treasury holdings in State Owned Enterprises (SOEs).
China is further masking its holdings in the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Belgium, Bermuda, etc.
As long as the US keeps running trade deficits, foreigners will accumulate US dollars. They recycle those dollars somewhere, usually US treasuries or agencies.
Dumping is impossible in aggregate because someone must hold every treasury issued 100 percent of that time.
Points three and four get to the heart of the matter, not mentioned above.
Mathematically, without dispute, someone must hold every treasury issued 100 percent of that time.
Who is that someone and how can anyone possibly dump them?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3063125]Japan has been an exception, because most of the debt is held domestically, interest rates have been super low, and the central bank (like our Fed) has a lot of power to make rates whatever it wants them to be.[/QUOTE]And this is the gold bug excuse for why high amounts of debt did not matter to Japan. What is the difference between China owning a USA treasury bill versus you or I? If you are a smart investor, you invest on what the price is on a given item not through some sense of patriotism. If treasuries yield 20% and inflation is 1%, then buying treasuries is smart. What people do not get in Japan is their market peaked in 1989 so holding bonds ever since then over stocks was smart. A 1% yield is great when your stock market is tanking. That is why the Japanese people bought bonds.
Platinum is 30 X rarer than gold, and it is going for about $1900 an ounce whereas gold is going for $4500. That tells you how overpriced gold is. No one rushing into gold today can give me a good reason why to buy gold over platinum.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3063432]Trump is not failing in Iran. He has weakened Iran to a breaking point. Biden and Obama strengthened Iran by flooding them with cash. All the presidents in the past 30 years knew that someone would ultimately have to take out Iran but nobody had the balls to do it until Trump. Even Hillary said if she was elected that she would need to do it. Possibly Biden didn't support it because he didn't know Iran was a terrorist country. Probably didn't even know where Iran was. Trump inflation at 3% at the high is still 70% less than Biden inflation high. It is a small price to pay for Trump saving the world. You may not want to pay a little more for gas for a few months to ensure your kids and grandkids are in a safer world but most people do. You aren't worried that Trump will fail and destroy USA. You are worried that he will succeed and make the USA great and he will destroy the democrats political ideology.[/QUOTE]As CIA told, no danger for USA from Iran. With his war criminal Netanyahou, Trump wanted to kill mollahs, but he is so ignorant: You kill one, then becoming famous martyr and making babies who want to become same and ready to die for Allah, when US marines are afraid to die. Total failure, still mollahs and Iran blocking now since 1 month economics of the world in Ormuz pass, with inflation because of Trump who worked with Netanyahou who makes business with war, to avoid justice of his country. Americans and others now pay more expensive because of Trump who is not able to free Ormuz, but at least he killed 150 young girls in a school, but Iran is exactly same with same islamist chiit mollahs still leading there. Big problem is lack of knowledge of USA over their borders. I don t think our world, except Netanyahou, thank Trump and USA under him, when USA lost many wars since Vietnam, then Afghanistan. Many and even in his family think Trump fell under dementia megalomania and is not anymore able to think with his neurons, just a danger for our world, putting messe every day.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3063572]If you can't acknowledge that Iran is a terrorist country and a danger to the world then you must be a terrorist supporter yourself. There are hundreds of posts by past presidents and congress both republican and democrat who publicly called out this terrorist country. If you aren't t smart enough to google it then you have bigger problems in life. Any person that supports terrorism over Trump administration has serious problems in life. I feel sorry for you.[/QUOTE]Yeah, that is where Dems make fools of themselves. They actually criticized Trump taking out Maduro, and the latest dumb Dem tactic is saying things are the same in Venezuela which is total BS.
With this war, the dumbest Dem line is saying Iran is winning. It is kind of hard to say that when their leadership has been killed. Are those dead leaders "winning"? Iran is rationing gasoline while prices have skyrocketed all over the world. Outside of gasoline / oil producers that are not in the Middle East, I do not see any winners here. I see nothing but losers.
The issue I have with Trump is he has declared victory without telling us what victory is. IOW, how do you win? If victory was taking out Iran's leadership and having more reasonable people in charge, I do not see that as a victory at all.
If victory is saying that Iran does not have uranium to make a bomb, then you have to admit you were wrong when you said that your bombing Iran earlier did not work in deterring the Iranian nuclear program. That is the problem when you have a narcissistic personality like Trump. He never admits that he is wrong.
You do not even have to personally admit that you were at fault. You just say that the intelligence reports were wrong. Yeah, you are giving the Dems reason to be critical of you, but at least, you are being honest, and I think the American people would appreciate the truth.
Right now, people are looking at higher gasoline prices with a war that has no end in sight and are saying, "Okay, what is the plan? Why are we at war? Obviously, Iran has enough uranium to make nukes and have not used them. Israel has admitted to being able to assemble nuclear weapons rapidly. Why are we okay with Israel having nukes but Iran not?" The notion that Israel is the good guys after what they have done in Gaza is absurd.
As of now, we do not have answers to these questions and until we do, the war looks like a mistake to me. Trump can turn it around, but it is not looking good at the moment. The Dem notion that Iran is winning is absurd but so is Trump when he is saying that the USA has won. So far we have seen nothing but pain with no gain.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3063625]This is the gold bug question, and you are leaving out two key components. How much does the buddy have in assets? And what yield on the debt am I getting?
This is more of the gold bug / crypto fear mongering. When it comes to the political, I am not that thrilled by Mish Shedlock, but he is much stronger economically. Anyway, here is what he posted on China dumping treasuries, [URL]https://mishtalk.com/economics/is-china-selling-us-treasuries-ai-view-consensus-view-and-the-right-view/[/URL]
China is masking Treasury holdings in State Owned Enterprises (SOEs).
China is further masking its holdings in the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Belgium, Bermuda, etc.
As long as the US keeps running trade deficits, foreigners will accumulate US dollars. They recycle those dollars somewhere, usually US treasuries or agencies.
Dumping is impossible in aggregate because someone must hold every treasury issued 100 percent of that time.
Points three and four get to the heart of the matter, not mentioned above.
Mathematically, without dispute, someone must hold every treasury issued 100 percent of that time.
Who is that someone and how can anyone possibly dump them?
And this is the gold bug excuse for why high amounts of debt did not matter to Japan. What is the difference between China owning a USA treasury bill versus you or I? If you are a smart investor, you invest on what the price is on a given item not through some sense of patriotism. If treasuries yield 20% and inflation is 1%, then buying treasuries is smart. What people do not get in Japan is their market peaked in 1989 so holding bonds ever since then over stocks was smart. A 1% yield is great when your stock market is tanking. That is why the Japanese people bought bonds.
Platinum is 30 X rarer than gold, and it is going for about $1900 an ounce whereas gold is going for $4500. That tells you how overpriced gold is. No one rushing into gold today can give me a good reason why to buy gold over platinum.[/QUOTE]Thought provoking comments, thanks Elvis.
I'm a hypocrite here, because I've got more money in interest bearing USD instruments, including treasury bills, than anything else. I'm short gold -- I sold gold futures contracts as a partial hedge against shares in two gold mining companies. And I'd rather own dollars than gold or bitcoin. I am increasing my allocation to equities.
I asked Gemini for the market value of federal assets and liabilities. Here's what it came back with.
Assets:
Gold reserves 1.23 trillion.
Land & Buildings 5.10 trillion.
Mineral rights 11.50 trillion.
Student / Federal Loans 1.35 trillion.
Other assets 2.70 trillion.
Total assets 21.88 trillion.
Liabilities:
Debt held by the public: 28.2 trillion (reported value is $30.3 trillion but market value is lower because on average interest rates are higher than when the debt was issued).
Government Employee / Veteran Benefits: 15.5 trillion.
Other Liabilities: $2 trillion.
Total Liabilities $45.7 trillion.
First, Gemini agrees with you that oil and gas rights held by the feds are worth a lot. That's most of the $11.5 trillion, the largest asset component.
Second, liabilities are greater than assets by $23.8 trillion, based on market values. And that doesn't include social security and Medicare.
So, you've got an entity, the USA Government, with negative equity of $23.8 trillion. It spends $1.8 trillion a year more than it takes in, in revenues.
Again, the foreign debt thing is above my pay grade, for the USA anyway. About 30% of federal debt that's not held by the USA Government is held by foreigners I can tell you that any emerging market country with the same balance sheet and level of foreign debt and current account deficit and government budget deficits would be considered a basket case. Interest rates would shoot up because otherwise foreigners, and as you point out domestic investors too, wouldn't hold the debt otherwise. And if interest rates were kept low there would be massive capital flows out of the country unless foreign exchange controls were implemented. At some point the IMF might come to the rescue, with loans and an austerity program. Or the country could just go on being a basket case.
Anyway, yes, someone must hold every treasury. But they may demand, say, a 10% yield to do it. That's when things would get dicey.
Gold is a tier-1 central bank reserve asset, even more so after the the west impounded Russian and Iranian sovereign assets that were sitting in USA And European banks, Euroclear, etc. Central banks though don't buy platinum for their vaults. Still, I agree, I'd rather own platinum than gold at present prices.
Great explanation about Japan. I never thought about that and it makes good sense. Obviously that’s not a good situation to be in — a declining stock market and moribund economy.
-
2 photos
Of course, this is con man Trump's pattern
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3063639]As CIA told, no danger for USA from Iran. With his war criminal Netanyahou, Trump wanted to kill mollahs, but he is so ignorant: You kill one, then becoming famous martyr and making babies who want to become same and ready to die for Allah, when US marines are afraid to die. Total failure, still mollahs and Iran blocking now since 1 month economics of the world in Ormuz pass, with inflation because of Trump who worked with Netanyahou who makes business with war, to avoid justice of his country. Americans and others now pay more expensive because of Trump who is not able to free Ormuz, but at least he killed 150 young girls in a school, but Iran is exactly same with same islamist chiit mollahs still leading there. Big problem is lack of knowledge of USA over their borders. I don t think our world, except Netanyahou, thank Trump and USA under him, when USA lost many wars since Vietnam, then Afghanistan. Many and even in his family think Trump fell under dementia megalomania and is not anymore able to think with his neurons, just a danger for our world, putting messe every day.[/QUOTE]Absolutely true.
The credible intel said Iran did not pose a threat or plan a first strike.
This link mirrors dozens of other credible real news sources but can be accessed without subscribing:
[B]Pentagon tells Congress no intelligence showed Iran was preparing to strike before US attack.
Closed-door briefings acknowledge no evidence that Tehran intended to hit US forces first, as Democrats accuse Trump of launching a war of choice.
March 2, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.trtworld.com/article/50386a301b64[/URL]
[QUOTE]Trump has argued, without presenting evidence, that Iran was on track to soon secure the ability to strike the United States with a ballistic missile.
His missile claim was not backed by US intelligence reports, and appeared to be exaggerated, sources familiar with the reports have told Reuters.[/QUOTE]Trump and his Repubs being the darlings of Mainstream Media, note how even in these damning reports MSM cannot help but softpeddle the Trump / Repub con here; Trump didn't merely start an unprovoked, counterproductive War of Choice against Iran "without presenting evidence" that it was necessary. Nope. He did it CONTRARY to the evidence that it was necessary. From his own Administration.
Trump knew from the very beginning that Iran was in compliance with the nuclear deal. He and his own Administration confirmed Iran was in compliance with the nuclear deal. Twice. Right before he tore up the deal anyway and immediately defunded and removed the inspectors who also confirmed Iran was in compliance with the deal.
[B]Trump Says Iran Complying With Nuclear Deal But Remains Dangerous Threat.
This is the second time Trump certified Iranian compliance with the agreement since he took office in January, despite once calling it "the worst deal ever."
July 18, 2017[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trump-says-iran-complying-nuclear-deal-remains-dangerous-threat-n783946[/URL]
Trump defunded and removed the inspectors and thereby created the conditions that ushered in a global catastrophe. Sound familiar? It should.
He did the exact same thing in his 1st disastrous term when he defunded and removed the highly effective Pandemic Prevention and Response teams leadership from those Chinese labs in 2019, thereby ushering in Trump's Pandemic with the millions of deaths, worldwide economic and supply-chain collapse, the global hyper-inflation, business, school and travel venue closures that followed, only to eventually admit in a March 2020 recorded interview with Bob Woodward that "we could have avoided all the trouble and stopped it easily" if only a responsible party had been there to tell us about those early Covid cases "two months sooner. " The only reason responsible parties were not there to tell us about them is because Trump "defunded and removed" their leadership several months sooner.
And he did that for the same underlying reason he tore up the original Iran Nuclear Deal; it was a successful and highly effective program that had Clinton and Obama's signature all over it.
Now he is begging Iran to agree to a deal that will likely never be as good as the one he tore up.
Realistically, the only way for Trump to have anything whatsoever to do with a "new" and remotely successful Iran Nuclear Deal is for him to beg and recruit Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Kerry to please return to service and do again all the hard work they put into it the first time. And more.
Because it is clear nobody in the Trump Administration, nobody else he knows, no Repub in the House or in the Senate has the slightest clue what to do or how to do it. Least of all Trump himself.
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3063639]As CIA told, no danger for USA from Iran. With his war criminal Netanyahou, Trump wanted to kill mollahs, but he is so ignorant: You kill one, then becoming famous martyr and making babies who want to become same and ready to die for Allah, when US marines are afraid to die. Total failure, still mollahs and Iran blocking now since 1 month economics of the world in Ormuz pass, with inflation because of Trump who worked with Netanyahou who makes business with war, to avoid justice of his country. Americans and others now pay more expensive because of Trump who is not able to free Ormuz, but at least he killed 150 young girls in a school, but Iran is exactly same with same islamist chiit mollahs still leading there. Big problem is lack of knowledge of USA over their borders. I don t think our world, except Netanyahou, thank Trump and USA under him, when USA lost many wars since Vietnam, then Afghanistan. Many and even in his family think Trump fell under dementia megalomania and is not anymore able to think with his neurons, just a danger for our world, putting messe every day.[/QUOTE]Because of inflation he is making with his war with no reason and taxes, Trump is falling with Americans. I wish they will fire such crazy senile in November and same for Israel with their war criminal Netanyahou. After killing 150 young girls, Trump should be ranked as a war criminal, after already sexual criminal.
-
Choosing Iran
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3063602]First, the AI Overview with substantiation links for how Trump lied to start his illegal Iran War with the only logical and supportable purpose being to Pay Back Netanyahu for squeezing out a fraction of a single percentage point swing among the Muslim Community of voters from their usual Dem candidate vote to the Repub candidate across the only three Swing States that mattered, PA, MI and WI, by stoking their antagonism for the Biden Administration by strategically delaying the May 2024 Biden-negotiated ceasefire until after the election. Had Netanyahu honored that ceasefire agreement before the 2024 election there is zero evidence that so much as one "winning" Electoral College vote for Trump would have come from any other demographic in any other states on any other issue. Trump owed Netanyahu a huge Pay Back favor.
Trump also owed major Pay Back favors to predominantly Muslim countries that, like Netanyahu, had pined for decades for a USA president stupid enough to plunge America into a War in Iran; Qatar for that sweet bribe of a $400 Million airliner, the UAE for that sweet bribe in the Billions of $ to bail out the Trump Crime Family's failing crypto venture, Saudi Arabia for that sweet bribe in the Billions to $ to Trump's son-in-law Jared and daughter Ivanka in an ongoing personal real estate deal clumsily disguised as some kind of "foreign policy" negotiations for the USA and others.[/QUOTE]Choosing Iran over Trump dictates who you are. Free speech. You can protect and coddle Iran all you want but a patriot of USA just doesn't do that. Choosing Iran defines you.
-
3 photos
Hey, speaking of Trump and crime
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3063724]Because of inflation he is making with his war with no reason and taxes, Trump is falling with Americans. I wish they will fire such crazy senile in November and same for Israel with their war criminal Netanyahou. After killing 150 young girls, Trump should be ranked as a war criminal, after already sexual criminal.[/QUOTE]For too long one of only two issues the demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics poll of polls found Trump not to have greater than 50% Disapproval on was on the issue of "crime. " But just today RCP's poll of polls shows Trump with a greater than 50% Disapproval on that issue too! That is along with his much, much greater than 50% Disapproval on almost every other issue RCP feels is worth asking about; overall Job Approval, the Economy, Inflation, Immigration, Foreign Policy and Iran.
Now the lone exception issue the demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP feels is worth asking about in their poll of polls for which Trump doesn't have a greater than 50% Disapproval on is Israel / Hamas. Which, not coincidentally, was the one issue for the one demographic in the only three Swing states that mattered that swung just enough votes his way to squeak out a razor-thin Electoral College win for him. And that was thanks solely to Netanyahu strategically delaying honoring the May 2024 Biden-negotiated ceasefire until after the November 2024 election.
But Trump has only a squeaker of a razor-thin margin under 50% Disapproval on that issue too! Yes, at 49.5% Disapproval he has a clear plurality Disapproval on that issue. But he just misses out on earning a greater than 50% Disapproval on it by less than about 0. 6 of a percentage point. So that one remaining issue can flip any minute now and earn Trump an across-the-board greater than 50% Disapproval on every issue the demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP can think of to ask about for him.
[URL]https://www.realclearpolitics.com/[/URL]
See screenshots below.
Oh! I also included a screenshot of the very high gas prices those nice folks in the only three Swing states that mattered for the presidential election outcome in 2024, PA, MI and WI, because it is encouraging to see them learning the painful FAFO lesson to be learned by not coming out to vote for Harris in a few thousand more numbers to override what that relatively tiny handful of angry Muslims in their states foolishly did to their states, the rest of the country and to themselves. Just because their personal financial situation was satisfying enough in 2024 not to feel compelled to bother voting or just because some typically pro Repub "bothsider / neithersiders" had tried to bamboozle them into believing the horsesh*t that it doesn't really matter all that much which Party is in the White House did not give them or anyone else an excuse not to think well enough of their friends, family America to vote for the Dem candidate no matter who he, she or they are.
-
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3063724]Because of inflation he is making with his war with no reason and taxes, Trump is falling with Americans. I wish they will fire such crazy senile in November and same for Israel with their war criminal Netanyahou. After killing 150 young girls, Trump should be ranked as a war criminal, after already sexual criminal.[/QUOTE]And more than inflation for Americans and the world, Trump already spent 25 billions for his war. For what? When will be new ayatollah and still mollahs blocking Ormuz, making messe in world economics. Failing Trump for else than his bullshiting delirium. Just a crazy senile too old guy not good for our world and not even sure for USA which are not MAGA at all, when Trump promised peace to be re elected, but failed for Ukraine and started new wars. Liar fucking Americans.
-
The 'Terrorist World' according to Trump and Canada?
[QUOTE=Canada;3063572]If you can't acknowledge that Iran is a terrorist country and a danger to the world then you must be a terrorist supporter yourself. There are hundreds of posts by past presidents and congress both republican and democrat who publicly called out this terrorist country. If you aren't t smart enough to google it then you have bigger problems in life. Any person that supports terrorism over Trump administration has serious problems in life. I feel sorry for you.[/QUOTE]Dude, you do realize, that according to your MAGA Fuhrer, it wasn't too long ago, Canada was a borderline, "terrorist-adjacent" state, right!
So what constitutes a terrorist state or country? Is it on the word of a crazy corrupt, insane mad MAGA president and a Repub wayward Congress? And does that still give you the right to attack said sovereign nation, without probable cause, just on the say so of an insane MAGA Fuhrer or mad king? So why not also attack Russia, North Korea, Pakistan, Syria, Colombia, Israel or Canada?
According to the Global Terrorism Index, [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Terrorism_Index[/URL] both Russia and Pakistan or higher on their terrorist scale than Iran.
If you think a president simply calling out another sovereign country as harboring "terrorist", "drug terrorist", "narco terrorists" and / or "a threat to national security", as the means or rights to attack another sovereign country, then it should come as no surprise that Canada would also fit the bill, for your crazy delusional war-mongering MAGA Fuhrer.
I mean, if memory serves it wasn't long ago, MAGA suckers, where listening to shit coming out of your MAGA Fuhrer's mouth, as if it were gospel, when their MAGA Fuhrer, was basically bullying and calling [I][b]Canada, a "terrorist-adjacent"[/b][/I] country and [I][b]"a threat to national security"[/b][/I]
By all accounts, for MAGA warmongers ideological thinking, doesn't that represent the perfect reason, just on your MAGA Fuhrer's say so, to attack and bomb Canada?
-
3 photos
Which part of those reports confused you the most?
[QUOTE=Canada;3063743]Choosing Iran over Trump dictates who you are. Free speech. You can protect and coddle Iran all you want but a patriot of USA just doesn't do that. Choosing Iran defines you.[/QUOTE]Voting for Obama in 2008 and 2012 resulted in an agreement with Iran that everyone confirmed was preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons, including the Trump Administration. Twice.
Not voting for Clinton in 2016 resulted in the defunding and removal of the Inspectors that had been stationed in Iran, allowing Iran to do damn well anything it wanted over the past 9 years.
Not voting for Harris in 2024 has resulted in Iran now having a more virulently anti-American regime than it has ever had, a much, much stronger position in the Strait of Hormuz to wreak havoc and inflict serious harm to worldwide economies including USA and Canada, make many, many millions of dollars on their lovely new tollway, drain the USA of much of its critical military air-power, add Billions now but Trillions more in the future to Trump's deficits, skyrocketing gas prices, the average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA under Trump already being higher than at any time under Biden except for 2 months way back in 2022 and then only $0. 63 more at most for a few days, current and looming higher prices for most everything else, strengthening the economies and competitive position vs USA of China and Russia Russia Russia, the death of more than a dozen USA military personnel so far, thousands of Iranian citizens including more than 100 school girls and most certainly a greater ambition in Iran and every other country on Earth to develop nuclear weapons ASAP as shown by the current USA so-called potus is the only logical route to protect and defend themselves from USA military aggression.
Now, for my part, I voted for Harris in 2024 for that reason and for many other inarguably pro USA reasons while, being Canadian, presumably you didn't vote for any Federal USA election candidate or issue.
But I'm guessing you urged every eligible USA citizen you met not to vote for Harris and consequently to vote for Trump and all of the above horrific results as well as for Trump's Pandemic, Trump's worldwide economic collapse and hyper-inflation, Trump's failed trade wars, Trump's Worst Presidency in USA History 1st term, Trump's even worse 2nd term and on and on, right?
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3063743]Choosing Iran over Trump dictates who you are. Free speech. You can protect and coddle Iran all you want but a patriot of USA just doesn't do that. Choosing Iran defines you.[/QUOTE]I don't think any here support islamist mollahs, but when was 0 threat for USA from Iran, when your Trump promised peace to be re elected, but such liar and senile crazy dangerous bullshiting every day, putting messe in world and economics, when really not MAGA under him USA won't change mollahs, only ignorant can believe him. Trump is a real disease for our world and pollution and I have big problem he is making a 250 billions gift to Putin versus Ukraine. Just a shameful guy, not more.
-
Electrostate vs. Petrostate: The glory days of hillbilly 'white men' and fossil fuels
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3062701]Elvis you selfish ingrate. You sir are an American white male. Compared to everyone else on the planet you started life with a big head start. Now you, and I, must pay for the sins of all the white males who preceded us.
Since the USA, run by white males, "is the nation that HAD polluted the most," it falls upon us to clean up this mess. Indians and Chinese and all the rest certainly don't have the money.
Then of course there's the issue of reparations to Black Americans. ...
Finally there's the issue of the lands the White Man stole from the native American, while killing many with guns and diseases. ...
...Remember Dave Ramsey, rice and beans, beans and rice.[/QUOTE]LOL! Amazing what passes for sad "white man" satire, these days!
Couldn't help but think, that that horrific post, was akin to a scene in nursing home, where two old fuddy-duddies, some future version of Tiny 12 and Elvis 2008, are hunchbacked sitting around, like two old confederate hillbilly men, sitting in their rocking chairs, wit thier best chewing tobacco, opining about the good old days, when white men, [I]"ruled the world", "crushed and enslaved the blacks, browns and people of color, under white boot heels"[/I] and [I]"divvied-up up the spoils of war",[/I] of white imperial colonialism.
No doubt, I bet, in their best MAGA southern drawl, toasting the "good ole days" and the obligatory southern hillbilly warmongers cry of [I][b]"The South shall raise again!",[/b][/I] all taken from a dead and bygone confederate era.
But while the above gullible MAGA hillbillies, that wish to opine about a bygone confederate era in history, today in history, the [I]"orange white man"[/I] in the WH, their MAGA Fuhrer and his fragile ego, corruption, grifting and ineptitude, has again thrown America, into yet another series of useless wars, [B]due to his feckless morale turpitude,[/B] and is again bankrupting working class Americans.
[U]U.S. Trucking Bankruptcies:[/U]
[B]First[/B] it was the farmers, [B]then[/B] it was small businesses, [B]now[/B] it's the trucking industry. Under the MAGA Fuhrer's and Repub Admin 2. 0, they have lurched from their own ineptitude and manufactured crisis to crisis, while bankrupting Americans.
Thanks to the MAGA Fuhrer's (and Bonkers Bibi), illegal war against Iran, a worldwide diesel trucking crisis has emerged. In Europe, Australia and even in the United States, truckers and are limiting their mileage, deadheading or parking their rigs / trucks waiting for fuel prices to drop, as many companies go broke and bankrupt due to the record high rising cost of diesel fuel, because of the MAGA Fuhrer and feckless Repub party.
[B]The Great Capacity Purge:[/B] How Record Carrier Failures Are Reshaping the Freight Market in Late 2025,[URL]https://lunalogistics.net/carrier-bankruptcies-freight-capacity-crisis-2025/[/URL] By November 2025, trucking bankruptcies hit highest rate on record. 5,000-8,000 carriers exited 2025 alone and the largest shakeout since 1980. The continued outlook for 2026, is predicted to be a [B]"complete bloodbath".[/B] [URL]https://equipmentfinancenews.com/news/transportation/experts-weigh-in-on-distress-bankruptcies-in-trucking/[/URL].
[U]China and Europe EV Trucking Sales Soar:[/U]
So while "drill-baby-drill", surging diesel prices and the trucking economic uncertainty, tied to the MAGA Fuhrer's wars, trade policies and tariffs era, cause untold harm and bankruptcies to several thousand diesel operated trucking companies, others who've made the shift to electric trucking, are doing great and weathering the storm and seeing prosperity in a new era of trucking.
[B]The road to profitability:[/B] why fleets are going electric [URL]https://kempower.com/america/profitability-with-electric-fleets/[/URL], with several reporting significant savings, including $80,000 annually per drayage truck.
In Europe and China, EV trucking sales soar to new heights, where heavy-duty trucks accounted for 29% of all sales in 2025, with new energy heavy-duty truck registrations increasing by 182% over 2024. In the EU, electric heavy-duty truck sales surged by 60% in 2025. [URL]https://www.transportenvironment.org/articles/zero-emission-trucks-in-europe-the-road-so-far[/URL].
Opining over a bygone confederate hillbilly era, while nostalgic, is IMO, really just another hillbilly "Kodak moment", by those who care nothing about Americas suffering and going bankrupt, under a MAGA 2. 0 regime.
-
Not a clue
[QUOTE=Spidy;3063987]LOL! Amazing what passes for sad "white man" satire, these days!
Couldn't help but think, that that horrific post, was akin to a scene in nursing home, where two old fuddy-duddies, some future version of Tiny 12 and Elvis 2008, are hunchbacked sitting around, like two old confederate hillbilly men, sitting in their rocking chairs, wit thier best chewing tobacco, opining about the good old days, when white men, [I]"ruled the world", "crushed and enslaved the blacks, browns and people of color, under white boot heels"[/I] and [I]"divvied-up up the spoils of war",[/I] of white imperial colonialism.
No doubt, I bet, in their best MAGA southern drawl, toasting the "good ole days" and the obligatory southern hillbilly warmongers cry of [I][b]"The South shall raise again!",[/b][/I] all taken from a dead and bygone confederate era.
But while the above gullible MAGA hillbillies, that wish to opine about a bygone confederate era in history, today in history, the [I]"orange white man"[/I] in the WH, their MAGA Fuhrer and his fragile ego, corruption, grifting and ineptitude, has again thrown America, into yet another series of useless wars, [B]due to his feckless morale turpitude,[/B] and is again bankrupting working class Americans.
[U]U.S. Trucking Bankruptcies:[/U]
[B]First[/B] it was the farmers, [B]then[/B] it was small businesses, [B]now[/B] it's the trucking industry. Under the MAGA Fuhrer's and Repub Admin 2. 0, they have lurched from their own ineptitude and manufactured crisis to crisis, while bankrupting Americans.
Thanks to the MAGA Fuhrer's (and Bonkers Bibi), illegal war against Iran, a worldwide diesel trucking crisis has emerged. In Europe, Australia and even in the United States, truckers and are limiting their mileage, deadheading or parking their rigs / trucks waiting for fuel prices to drop, as many companies go broke and bankrupt due to the record high rising cost of diesel fuel, because of the MAGA Fuhrer and feckless Repub party.
[B]The Great Capacity Purge:[/B] How Record Carrier Failures Are Reshaping the Freight Market in Late 2025,[URL]https://lunalogistics.net/carrier-bankruptcies-freight-capacity-crisis-2025/[/URL] By November 2025, trucking bankruptcies hit highest rate on record. 5,000-8,000 carriers exited 2025 alone and the largest shakeout since 1980. The continued outlook for 2026, is predicted to be a [B]"complete bloodbath".[/B] [URL]https://equipmentfinancenews.com/news/transportation/experts-weigh-in-on-distress-bankruptcies-in-trucking/[/URL].
[U]China and Europe EV Trucking Sales Soar:[/U]
So while "drill-baby-drill", surging diesel prices and the trucking economic uncertainty, tied to the MAGA Fuhrer's wars, trade policies and tariffs era, cause untold harm and bankruptcies to several thousand diesel operated trucking companies, others who've made the shift to electric trucking, are doing great and weathering the storm and seeing prosperity in a new era of trucking.
[B]The road to profitability:[/B] why fleets are going electric [URL]https://kempower.com/america/profitability-with-electric-fleets/[/URL], with several reporting significant savings, including $80,000 annually per drayage truck.
In Europe and China, EV trucking sales soar to new heights, where heavy-duty trucks accounted for 29% of all sales in 2025, with new energy heavy-duty truck registrations increasing by 182% over 2024. In the EU, electric heavy-duty truck sales surged by 60% in 2025. [URL]https://www.transportenvironment.org/articles/zero-emission-trucks-in-europe-the-road-so-far[/URL].
Opining over a bygone confederate hillbilly era, while nostalgic, is IMO, really just another hillbilly "Kodak moment", by those who care nothing about Americas suffering and going bankrupt, under a MAGA 2. 0 regime.[/QUOTE]Not a clue to reality.
-
Far from the truth
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3063939]Voting for Obama in 2008 and 2012 resulted in an agreement with Iran that everyone confirmed was preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons, including the Trump Administration. Twice.
Not voting for Clinton in 2016 resulted in the defunding and removal of the Inspectors that had been stationed in Iran, allowing Iran to do damn well anything it wanted over the past 9 years.
Not voting for Harris in 2024 has resulted in Iran now having a more virulently anti-American regime than it has ever had, a much, much stronger position in the Strait of Hormuz to wreak havoc and inflict serious harm to worldwide economies including USA and Canada, make many, many millions of dollars on their lovely new tollway, drain the USA of much of its critical military air-power, add Billions now but Trillions more in the future to Trump's deficits, skyrocketing gas prices, the average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA under Trump already being higher than at any time under Biden except for 2 months way back in 2022 and then only $0. 63 more at most for a few days, current and looming higher prices for most everything else, strengthening the economies and competitive position vs USA of China and Russia Russia Russia, the death of more than a dozen USA military personnel so far, thousands of Iranian citizens including more than 100 school girls and most certainly a greater ambition in Iran and every other country on Earth to develop nuclear weapons ASAP as shown by the current USA so-called potus is the only logical route to protect and defend themselves from USA military aggression.[/QUOTE]Your post about Obama and Iran are so far from the truth. Obviously you hate Trump and support everything Trump is against. Trump is for no terrorist having nuclear weapons and you support the terrorists. Trump loves USA. You hate USA. Gas and diesel are still lower than the Biden years and Trump tax credit gives every American a $3500 average refund. This more than makes up for the short term inflation but you don't care because you hate Trump and USA.
-
Canada never a terrorist state
[QUOTE=Spidy;3063914]Dude, you do realize, that according to your MAGA Fuhrer, it wasn't too long ago, Canada was a borderline, "terrorist-adjacent" state, right!
So what constitutes a terrorist state or country? Is it on the word of a crazy corrupt, insane mad MAGA president and a Repub wayward Congress? And does that still give you the right to attack said sovereign nation, without probable cause, just on the say so of an insane MAGA Fuhrer or mad king? So why not also attack Russia, North Korea, Pakistan, Syria, Colombia, Israel or Canada?
According to the Global Terrorism Index, [URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Terrorism_Index[/URL] both Russia and Pakistan or higher on their terrorist scale than Iran.
If you think a president simply calling out another sovereign country as harboring "terrorist", "drug terrorist", "narco terrorists" and / or "a threat to national security", as the means or rights to attack another sovereign country, then it should come as no surprise that Canada would also fit the bill, for your crazy delusional war-mongering MAGA Fuhrer.
I mean, if memory serves it wasn't long ago, MAGA suckers, where listening to shit coming out of your MAGA Fuhrer's mouth, as if it were gospel, when their MAGA Fuhrer, was basically bullying and calling [I][b]Canada, a "terrorist-adjacent"[/b][/I] country and [I][b]"a threat to national security"[/b][/I]
By all accounts, for MAGA warmongers ideological thinking, doesn't that represent the perfect reason, just on your MAGA Fuhrer's say so, to attack and bomb Canada?[/QUOTE]Canada was never a terrorist state but under had Trudeau who like Biden loved open borders. And thousands of terrorists poured into Canada and many into USA. We have a real problem with immigration in Canada and we don't have anyone smart enough to fix it. At least we are limiting immigration now but to little to late. Canada needs a leader like Trump.
-
Daddy, how were we eclipsed by China?
2046: This is a question our children or grandchildren are asking us. How do we answer this?
Son, it's not because China was vastly superior to us in technology or industry or in any other sector. It was because we abandoned all the values that supposedly define us. We believe in democracy yet we elected a man who once had invited thugs into our hallowed grounds to kill our VP; we then elected him again and he zealously destroyed every feature of democratic checks and balances. He went on another rampage of destruction and wars that he started but could not win. We were humiliated, embarrassed, ridiculed on the world stage, left with our tail between our legs.
And all of this China watched quietly. Biding its time. And all that time it built up its weaponry and only when it was ready did it pounce. Only when it knew that America could not beat it in its own theatre of war, the South China Sea, did it pounce on Taiwan. And it took Taiwan with only words of indignation from America- for it knew from the Iranian debacle 6 years earlier that America had not the appetite to lose its men in war for Iran and so it wasn't going to lose its men fighting China, a far, far more potent adversary.
And so, my son, the Iran debacle was the beginning of our demise. And here we are: still with weaponry that can destroy mankind many times over, but largely impotent because our adversaries can do the same. We lost our values being the only features which gave us a moral high ground over China, and we were overshadowed by China in geopolitics who nurtured longer terms transactional relationships, while we were deemed a devious, unreliable and capricious party.
We abandoned the world but then the world abandoned us. So my child this is how have ended up, still rich, still powerful but largely irrelevant, disliked sometimes despised, ridiculed, and most fatefully of all, irrelevant on the world stage.
-
Thank you
[QUOTE=Spidy;3063987]LOL! Amazing what passes for sad "white man" satire, these days!
Couldn't help but think, that that horrific post, was akin to a scene in nursing home, where two old fuddy-duddies, some future version of Tiny 12 and Elvis 2008, are hunchbacked sitting around, like two old confederate hillbilly men, sitting in their rocking chairs, wit thier best chewing tobacco, opining about the good old days, when white men, [I]"ruled the world", "crushed and enslaved the blacks, browns and people of color, under white boot heels"[/I] and [I]"divvied-up up the spoils of war",[/I] of white imperial colonialism.
No doubt, I bet, in their best MAGA southern drawl, toasting the "good ole days" and the obligatory southern hillbilly warmongers cry of [I][b]"The South shall raise again!",[/b][/I] all taken from a dead and bygone confederate era.
But while the above gullible MAGA hillbillies, that wish to opine about a bygone confederate era in history, today in history, the [I]"orange white man"[/I] in the WH, their MAGA Fuhrer and his fragile ego, corruption, grifting and ineptitude, has again thrown America, into yet another series of useless wars, [B]due to his feckless morale turpitude,[/B] and is again bankrupting working class Americans.
[U]U.S. Trucking Bankruptcies:[/U]
[B]First[/B] it was the farmers, [B]then[/B] it was small businesses, [B]now[/B] it's the trucking industry. Under the MAGA Fuhrer's and Repub Admin 2. 0, they have lurched from their own ineptitude and manufactured crisis to crisis, while bankrupting Americans.
Thanks to the MAGA Fuhrer's (and Bonkers Bibi), illegal war against Iran, a worldwide diesel trucking crisis has emerged. In Europe, Australia and even in the United States, truckers and are limiting their mileage, deadheading or parking their rigs / trucks waiting for fuel prices to drop, as many companies go broke and bankrupt due to the record high rising cost of diesel fuel, because of the MAGA Fuhrer and feckless Repub party..[/QUOTE]Thank you for the information you provide. It clearly states that trucking peaked by 2022 thanks to Trump policies in 2016-2020. The next 2 years of Biden administration killed the trucking industry and they finally went bankrupt in 2025. Thank you for pointing out Biden failures on this industry. It is important that you aren't blaming Trump on this.
-
Biden spent $300 billion on Ukraine war
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3063783]And more than inflation for Americans and the world, Trump already spent 25 billions for his war. For what? When will be new ayatollah and still mollahs blocking Ormuz, making messe in world economics. Failing Trump for else than his bullshiting delirium. Just a crazy senile too old guy not good for our world and not even sure for USA which are not MAGA at all, when Trump promised peace to be re elected, but failed for Ukraine and started new wars. Liar fucking Americans.[/QUOTE]Iran war is cheap compared to the $300 billion Biden spent on Ukraine war. Iran costs are a small price to pay for saving the world.
-
Gas prices
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3063771]For too long one of only two issues the demonstrably Winger-leaning RealClearPolitics poll of polls found Trump not to have greater than 50% Disapproval on was on the issue of "crime. " But just today RCP's poll of polls shows Trump with a greater than 50% Disapproval on that issue too! That is along with his much, much greater than 50% Disapproval on almost every other issue RCP feels is worth asking about; overall Job Approval, the Economy, Inflation, Immigration, Foreign Policy and Iran.
Now the lone exception issue the demonstrably Winger-leaning RCP feels is worth asking about in their poll of polls for which Trump doesn't have a greater than 50% Disapproval on is Israel / Hamas. Which, not coincidentally, was the one issue for the one demographic in the only three Swing states that mattered that swung just enough votes his way to squeak out a razor-thin Electoral College win for him. And that was thanks solely to Netanyahu strategically delaying honoring the May 2024 Biden-negotiated ceasefire until after the November 2024 election..[/QUOTE]Gas prices in every state in the USA are still cheaper than Biden gas prices and still cheaper than the last 10 years of California gas prices. Yes Newsome and the democrats have California inflation higher than any other state.
-
Hypocrisy at its finest
Hypocrisy at its finest in Washington this week. All the democrats who would not stand at the state of the union address for the World War hero's and the Democrats who March in the No Kings rally recently were standing and applauding King Charles this week. Also no protests for No Kings this week. Where were all the no king democrats that were protesting no kings a week ago. This week they were cheering kings. Which is it? Kings or no kings?
-
Not what I saw.
[QUOTE=Canada;3064087]Hypocrisy at its finest in Washington this week. All the democrats who would not stand at the state of the union address for the World War hero's and the Democrats who March in the No Kings rally recently were standing and applauding King Charles this week. Also no protests for No Kings this week. Where were all the no king democrats that were protesting no kings a week ago. This week they were cheering kings. Which is it? Kings or no kings?[/QUOTE]You obviously did not get subtlety of King Charles was lost on you. It was was quite rich to see a sovereign from England touting "checks and balances." That is a speech that Trump could never give because he thinks he's a king.
Has any President sought to put his signature on our money and his likeness in passport documents. It was Charles unlike Trump who taken to address the Epstein scandal by having his brother removed from from his residence.
I don't have a problem with kings elsewhere. We don't need and we don't want a monarchy here. To be free from a monarchy is why our country created. Even King Charles acknowledged as such in his speech. How come Trump can't do the same?
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3064080]Iran war is cheap compared to the $300 billion Biden spent on Ukraine war. Iran costs are a small price to pay for saving the world.[/QUOTE]Those Repuglicans really have a love affair with with the commie Putin. If you think Russia is great place then perhaps you ought to move there. You won't have 2nd Amendment rights in Russia that Repugluicans love to bleat about.
What has the "war" in Iran accomplished? I haven't heard much about that.
-
3 photos
Just Trump's latest open Love Letter to Russia Russia Russia
Trump knows he has much to thank and pay back Russia Russia Russia for, of course. Which is why he cannot resist the urge in his loins and groin to grant the decades' long wish of his beloved Puppet Master Putin to draw down USA Military presence in Europe with the inevitable outcome being it strengthens Russia Russia Russia's position to do to the rest of Europe what it has tried so hard with Trump's assistance along the way to do to Ukraine.
Its the same Trump playbook he used to usher in Trump Pandemic and the inevitable millions of deaths, worldwide economic destruction, supply-chain collapse, millions of jobs wiped out, business, school and travel venue closures, hyper-inflation, etc that followed; defund and remove the proven prevention and response forces and watch all the expert dire warnings for what will likely happen come true.
And nothing pleases Trump more than to pull this Trump playbook move while flattering other countries and fulfilling their anti-America wishes.
In the case of Trump's Pandemic, defunding and removing those proven Pandemic Prevention and Response teams leadership from those Chinese labs in 2019 contrary to all expert warnings for him not to do something so dangerous and stupid was in large part to flatter the ego of Xi in China, demonstrating to him how in tune he was with him on dismantling whatever much stronger China adversary Presidents like Obama and later Biden had built to put America First despite how it looked for China.
In the case of Trump's failing Iran War, it was to grant the long-held wishes of Netanyahu and several Muslim countries' leaders to finally bribe a so-called president of the USA stupid enough to do it into starting a War in. Iran.
The Trump Destroy America First pattern continues here:
[B]Trump says U.S. will withdraw number of troops in Germany a lot more than 5,000[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/02/trump-says-us-will-withdraw-troops-in-germany-a-lot-more-than-5000.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
[QUOTE]The planned withdrawal faced bipartisan resistance in Washington, with swift criticism from Democrats and concern from Republicans that it would send the wrong signal to Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose full-scale invasion of Ukraine recently entered its fifth year.
..........
After swift pushback from Democrats on Friday, Republican leaders of both armed services committees in Congress said Saturday they were very concerned about the troop withdrawal.
Sen. Roger Wicker of Mississippi and Rep. Mike Rogers of Alabama said the decision risked undermining deterrence and sending the wrong signal to Vladimir Putin.[/QUOTE]As an aside, oh look, what Putin did to the price of gas starting in 2022 and Trump did to the price of gas in 2026 has now skyrocketed the average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA to $4. 43+ as of this writing. See screenshots below.
Which is just $0. 63 lower than the highest price it hit for a few hours way back in 2022 and higher than it was at any time under Biden except for 2 months way back then. Of course, a big difference then was Biden-Harris' policies and management were creating millions more private-sector jobs than all three previous Repub presidents' policies and management combined, including Trump, vs now when Trump's jobs numbers are typical Repub crap and wage gains are the weakest in 5 years.
Oh well.
We tried.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3064080]Iran war is cheap compared to the $300 billion Biden spent on Ukraine war. Iran costs are a small price to pay for saving the world.[/QUOTE]Biden spent to defend freedom to get a land versus a criminal dictator and Trump even condemned after Putin took Crimea, but became senile and forgot, stopping to help Ukraine and also forgot his election promise, making war to Venezuela to rob petrol and to Iran, lying when only following Netanyahou, when CIA told no reason for war. A liar and big spending costing us a lot of money. I look forward his end, alive or dead. Only Netanyahou and Putin he is giving a so many billions gift with increasing rate gas, can need him, but not our world, when I support Germany versus master of bullshiting.
-
With his war making big inflation, Trump fucked a US planes company on which 28 millions US citizens travelled with low cost. Finish. Americans, thank your Trump you re elected, when he fuck you so deep, with his lies compare to his promises. Lost jobs, inflation and big spending for his golf and war with crazy dangerous Trump.
-
Fact Checks - Almost No Pinocchio’s for Canada!
[QUOTE=Canada;3064081]Gas prices in every state in the USA are still cheaper than Biden gas prices and still cheaper than the last 10 years of California gas prices. Yes Newsome and the democrats have California inflation higher than any other state.[/QUOTE]Tiny: Was the ratio of California retail gasoline prices to the national average retail gasoline price lower when Schwarzenegger, the last Republican governor of California, was governor?
Gemini: Yes, the ratio of California's retail gasoline prices to the national average was significantly lower during Arnold Schwarzenegger's governorship (2003-2011) than it is today.
During Schwarzenegger's tenure, California gas prices typically hovered around 10% to 15% above the national average. In contrast, in recent years (especially since 2015), that gap has widened significantly, with California prices often sitting 30% to 50% higher than the USA Average.
Tiny: Has California inflation been higher than the national average since Schwarzenegger left office?
Gemini: Since Arnold Schwarzenegger left office in January 2011, Californias inflation has generally outpaced the national average.
Tiny: In real (inflation adjusted) terms, were peak gasoline prices during the Biden administration higher than they are now?
Gemini: In real (inflation-adjusted) terms, peak gasoline prices during the Biden administration (2021-2025) were significantly higher than they are today.
Canada, Geminis only point of contention is about inflation in California compared to all other states. Inflation in Arizona and Florida among other states has been higher. That must be at least partly because some people are fleeing deep blue states like California. And going to certain other states which boosts their economies and inflation. California still runs neck and neck with deep blue Hawaii for the highest living expenses in the USA.
The California oil and gas and refining industry used to be one of the most vibrant in North America, which helped hold down prices. No more, thanks to California Democrats. A lot of people lost their jobs.
-
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3064059]2046: This is a question our children or grandchildren are asking us. How do we answer this?
Son, it's not because China was vastly superior to us in technology or industry or in any other sector. It was because we abandoned all the values that supposedly define us. We believe in democracy yet we elected a man who once had invited thugs into our hallowed grounds to kill our VP; we then elected him again and he zealously destroyed every feature of democratic checks and balances. He went on another rampage of destruction and wars that he started but could not win. We were humiliated, embarrassed, ridiculed on the world stage, left with our tail between our legs.
And all of this China watched quietly. Biding its time. And all that time it built up its weaponry and only when it was ready did it pounce. Only when it knew that America could not beat it in its own theatre of war, the South China Sea, did it pounce on Taiwan. And it took Taiwan with only words of indignation from America- for it knew from the Iranian debacle 6 years earlier that America had not the appetite to lose its men in war for Iran and so it wasn't going to lose its men fighting China, a far, far more potent adversary.
And so, my son, the Iran debacle was the beginning of our demise. And here we are: still with weaponry that can destroy mankind many times over, but largely impotent because our adversaries can do the same. We lost our values being the only features which gave us a moral high ground over China, and we were overshadowed by China in geopolitics who nurtured longer terms transactional relationships, while we were deemed a devious, unreliable and capricious party.
We abandoned the world but then the world abandoned us. So my child this is how have ended up, still rich, still powerful but largely irrelevant, disliked sometimes despised, ridiculed, and most fatefully of all, irrelevant on the world stage.[/QUOTE]This is way above my pay grade but I don't think it's that simple.
I don't think Trump makes much of a difference either way in the rise of China and the relative decline of the USA. That's going to happen regardless of who's president.
Iran might be a dissuading factor in the Chinese decision whether
to move on Taiwan. They have to weigh whether Trump's crazy like a fox. Or bat shit crazy, crazy enough to use the bomb for example. He hasn't TACO'ed on Iran. He had a great excuse to open up the Strait and keep the pressure on Iran to give up nuclear enrichment. But he opted not to by keeping the embargo in force. Chinas lesson from this may be that Trumps not going to roll over and play dead if it moves on Taiwan.
Finally, saying something that won’t be popular with anyone here. I question whether whether China is more willing to sacrifice human lives in wars than the USA. Recent history, since the Vietnam/China war would indicate it does not.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3064175]This is way above my pay grade but I don't think it's that simple.
I don't think Trump makes much of a difference either way in the rise of China and the relative decline of the USA. That's going to happen regardless of who's president.
Iran might be a dissuading factor in the Chinese decision whether
to move on Taiwan. They have to weigh whether Trump's crazy like a fox. Or bat shit crazy, crazy enough to use the bomb for example. He hasn't TACO'ed on Iran. He had a great excuse to open up the Strait and keep the pressure on Iran to give up nuclear enrichment. But he opted not to by keeping the embargo in force. Chinas lesson from this may be that Trumps not going to roll over and play dead if it moves on Taiwan.
Finally, saying something that wont be popular with anyone here. I question whether whether China is more willing to sacrifice human lives in wars than the USA. Recent history, since the Vietnam/China war would indicate it does not.[/QUOTE]I don't think China's going to make any moves on Taiwan in the immediate future, because a) they play the long game, and they've waited very long already and they know militarily they're still not there to compete with America if it went in all guns ablazing. Analysts reckon it will be several years yet before they're confident in taking on America in the South China sea. Not being a betting man, I'll bet they will wait until late 2028, early 2029 though to go in just before or slightly after whoever is next comes into power.
On your final point, normally China doesn't show interest in pursuing military (mis) adventures. They're not the ones who have invaded dozens of countries- but Taiwan is a big exception: to them Taiwan is a part of China, and they will do whatever it takes to bring it back into the fold.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3064175]This is way above my pay grade but I don't think it's that simple.
I don't think Trump makes much of a difference either way in the rise of China and the relative decline of the USA. That's going to happen regardless of who's president.[/QUOTE]Yes, it's too simple of a narrative. Trump is just a blip in history. China is and will be a great power. Currently, they are heading into structural economic headwinds (similar to Japan's lost decades). How they deal with that and how they emerge from it will be very important. People unfamiliar with economics seem to be impressed with the paper economic gains that a closed economy can defying economic cycles.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3064175]Iran might be a dissuading factor in the Chinese decision whether
to move on Taiwan. They have to weigh whether Trump's crazy like a fox. Or bat shit crazy, crazy enough to use the bomb for example. He hasn't TACO'ed on Iran. He had a great excuse to open up the Strait and keep the pressure on Iran to give up nuclear enrichment. But he opted not to by keeping the embargo in force. Chinas lesson from this may be that Trumps not going to roll over and play dead if it moves on Taiwan.[/QUOTE]I have heard now evidenced drone warfare would make a Chinese invasion across the Taiwan Strait treacherous. Pundits always discuss China being hemmed in by island nations that are not sympathetic. Due to strategic limitations, they have to make nice with their Pacific Rim neighbors.
-
Iran war
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3064101]Those Repuglicans really have a love affair with with the commie Putin. If you think Russia is great place then perhaps you ought to move there. You won't have 2nd Amendment rights in Russia that Repugluicans love to bleat about.
What has the "war" in Iran accomplished? I haven't heard much about that.[/QUOTE]Russia Ukraine war that Biden let happen and then funneled $300 billion into corrupt Ukraine officials accomplished nothing. Iran war has already accomplished more than Ukraine war at far less of a cost. Trump eliminating a terrorist country with nuclear ambitions will be one of the greatest accomplishments in USA history. Your kids and grandkids if you have any will appreciate it a lot more than you seem to.
Trump sanctions on Russia are not helping Putin. Russia isn't smart enough to abandon the Ukraine war and help the Russian citizens.
-
Sorry
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3064097]You obviously did not get subtlety of King Charles was lost on you. It was was quite rich to see a sovereign from England touting "checks and balances." That is a speech that Trump could never give because he thinks he's a king.
Has any President sought to put his signature on our money and his likeness in passport documents. It was Charles unlike Trump who taken to address the Epstein scandal by having his brother removed from from his residence.
I don't have a problem with kings elsewhere. We don't need and we don't want a monarchy here. To be free from a monarchy is why our country created. Even King Charles acknowledged as such in his speech. How come Trump can't do the same?[/QUOTE]Sorry I didn't see the coverage of all the no kings protests for King Charles. To me it appeared the democrats, socialists and communists loved King Charles. No kings seem to be hypocritical.
-
Nonsense
[QUOTE=Canada;3064218]Russia Ukraine war that Biden let happen and then funneled $300 billion into corrupt Ukraine officials accomplished nothing. Iran war has already accomplished more than Ukraine war at far less of a cost. Trump eliminating a terrorist country with nuclear ambitions will be one of the greatest accomplishments in USA history. Your kids and grandkids if you have any will appreciate it a lot more than you seem to.
Trump sanctions on Russia are not helping Putin. Russia isn't smart enough to abandon the Ukraine war and help the Russian citizens.[/QUOTE]Iran is not a threat to United States. However, Russia and North Korea have been testing systems to strike us for many years. How come Trump won't say or do anything except suck up Russia and North Korea?
I can wait for the answer while Trump builds a ballroom and hosts a UFC event at the Whitehouse. You seem to know Trump well so can kindly explain what his priorities are?
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3064218]Russia Ukraine war that Biden let happen and then funneled $300 billion into corrupt Ukraine officials accomplished nothing. Iran war has already accomplished more than Ukraine war at far less of a cost. Trump eliminating a terrorist country with nuclear ambitions will be one of the greatest accomplishments in USA history. Your kids and grandkids if you have any will appreciate it a lot more than you seem to.
Trump sanctions on Russia are not helping Putin. Russia isn't smart enough to abandon the Ukraine war and help the Russian citizens.[/QUOTE]Trump didn't touch mollahs nor uranium, but help Putin when making petrol rate increasing, more than 250 billions for Putin war, not for Russians. And with all his huge spending and fucking congress as a crazy, now USA debt, more than 31 thousands billions is more than yearly produced values. The fall of MAGA under a crazy loser.
-
Symptom and Cause
[QUOTE=WyattEarp;3064200]Yes, it's too simple of a narrative. Trump is just a blip in history. China is and will be a great power. Currently, they are heading into structural economic headwinds (similar to Japan's lost decades). How they deal with that and how they emerge from it will be very important. People unfamiliar with economics seem to be impressed with the paper economic gains that a closed economy can defying economic cycles.
I have heard now evidenced drone warfare would make a Chinese invasion across the Taiwan Strait treacherous. Pundits always discuss China being hemmed in by island nations that are not sympathetic. Due to strategic limitations, they have to make nice with their Pacific Rim neighbors.[/QUOTE]Trump is just a blip in history. .
Trump may just be a blip but to ignore him is to confuse symptom with cause. Trump is the symptom of the angst of a large segment of America. Optimists and democrats argue that only 3 x% of the electorate side with him. Let me put a slightly different perspective on this: 3 x% of the electorate side with him! Despite everything he has done and continues to do; and they will most likely continue to do this after he leaves and no matter what happens-even if he nukes Iran.
The issue is really not him but the rupture in America which continues to extend: there is no way this is sustainable. When two large segments of society are so heavily divided on so many matters- and these are matters not because of Trump and will outlive him- then there are only two possible scenarios: a) both sides compromise and move towards a middle ground; b) you go your separate ways. Anyone who thinks that a division of America is inconceivable needs to wake up and smell the coffee. It seems increasingly likely to me. I hope I am wrong. Yes, the ascendancy of China is inevitable but the descent of America is not but should the it occur then regardless of the challenges that China faces, it will eclipse America on the global stage whether it cares for it or not.
-
[QUOTE=HotDog666;3064316]Trump is just a blip in history. .
Trump may just be a blip but to ignore him is to confuse symptom with cause. Trump is the symptom of the angst of a large segment of America. Optimists and democrats argue that only 3 x% of the electorate side with him. Let me put a slightly different perspective on this: 3 x% of the electorate side with him! Despite everything he has done and continues to do; and they will most likely continue to do this after he leaves and no matter what happens-even if he nukes Iran.
The issue is really not him but the rupture in America which continues to extend: there is no way this is sustainable. When two large segments of society are so heavily divided on so many matters- and these are matters not because of Trump and will outlive him- then there are only two possible scenarios: a) both sides compromise and move towards a middle ground; b) you go your separate ways. Anyone who thinks that a division of America is inconceivable needs to wake up and smell the coffee. It seems increasingly likely to me. I hope I am wrong..[/QUOTE]I've made this point on another forum. Consensus coalitions don't always lead to good results. I think Germany has suffered from a lack of debate (Merkel years). The Conservatives in the you. K. Didn't seem to offer a truly distinct vision and thus Reform keeps making gains. Canada has rallied around an anti-Trump message, but will inevitably have to cope with its economic stagnation. France? France is a political basket case.
Let's face it Democratic politics are ugly and often messy. There has always been people trying to sell the idea of a perfect democracy.
I would admit USA Politics is very contentious. Much of the political discussion ignores that a great percentage of people are not as Red or Blue as the partisan media and political leaders want us to believe. Fun fact: Only 58% of Californians voted for Kamala Harris. I might add that is her home state. Trump won Texas with 56% of the vote. You get the picture.
Last point, the USA Has had much more political tranquility when one party dominated the USA House. The Democrats dominated the USA House from 1955-1995. Republican Presidents were forced to compromise with the House Democrats for forty years. After 1995, the USA House became more competitive and changed hands frequently.
That's neither bad or good. It just demonstrates political dominance can create an exaggerated sense of political consensus. The competition of political ideas is likely stunted.
I myself would worry about Germany or the U. K. If their governments can't cope with their current domestic issues.
-
Hey Canada
Here is part of a story from Doomberg about Alberta:
Political action inspired by the ghosts of oil-covered birds, otters, and sea lions has cost Canada's energy sector billions in lost profits, enriched its American neighbors by the difference, and stunted its geopolitical power—even as the war in Iran creates unprecedented demand for what the country could currently be offering. It's no exaggeration to say the fallout for the Canadian economy risks national unity, adding momentum to separatist movements in the Western provinces. With a fresh move afoot in Ottawa to undo the damage, and given the stakes involved, it's time to assess where the political puck is headed next.
Our story begins in Prince Rupert in northern British Columbia (BC), home to the deepest ice-free natural harbor in North America. Because it shaves about a day and a half off the voyage to Shanghai compared to Vancouver, the Port of Prince Rupert is home to a fast-growing container business. With a main‑channel depth of about 115 feet and berths in the 60-foot range, its natural harbor could, in principle, accommodate VLCCs, albeit not without significant new terminal and safety infrastructure.
Such possibilities have been explored for many years. In 2015, Eagle Spirit Energy partnered with dozens of First Nations on a proposed oil pipeline from Fort McMurray, Alberta, to a terminal site near Prince Rupert. Crude capacities of over 2 million barrels per day (bpd) were envisioned, with potential for later expansions. An on-corridor upgrader to convert bitumen to medium / heavy crude was also proposed, which would have reduced diluent use. Despite the logic of the proposal, the Eagle Spirit Pipeline never received federal approval.
Its demise can be traced to the 2019 Oil Tanker Moratorium Act by the Parliament of Canada, legislation otherwise known as Bill see-48. As the name implies, see-48 prohibits large tankers carrying more than 12,500 tonnes ( 90,000 barrels) of oil from calling on ports and marine installations along most of BC's north coast, effectively blocking the construction of new export terminals from the northern tip of Vancouver Island to the Alaska border. In lobbying for the bill's passage, environmentalists made heavy use of Valdez-related propaganda, reminding parliamentarians about that whole zero thing.
With northern competition swept aside, the Trans Mountain Pipeline, which carries crude from Edmonton, Alberta, to just east of Vancouver, was expanded instead. After its own winding and highly controversial odyssey, the project was finally finished in May of 2024, increasing its capacity from 300,000 to 890,000 bpd.
Prior to the expansion, nearly all of Canada's roughly 4 million bpd of oil exports were delivered to the US, the vast majority through existing cross-border land pipelines. Given high customer concentration and no substantial alternatives, Canadian crude historically sold for a significant discount—far deeper than simple grade differences would typically support. The benchmark most commonly used to quantify this phenomenon is the spread between Western Canadian Select (WCS) and West Texas Intermediate (WTI). Since the expanded pipeline began operations, both the absolute value and the volatility of that spread have narrowed significantly. Applied against roughly 1. 5 billion barrels of annual exports, every dollar of narrowing yields extra revenue that adds up quickly.
Of course, had the larger Eagle Spirit Pipeline been built, the WCS / WTI spread would presumably have narrowed even further, something not lost on contemporary political leaders in Alberta. That a US-based company's accident in US waters all those years ago continues to deny Albertans the full realized value of their hydrocarbon endowment because they are still forced to sell the bulk of their production to the US is nothing if not ironic. Whether Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith can unstick this situation almost certainly depends on whether a major exemption from Bill see-48 is in the offing.
When the two signed their historic memorandum of understanding (MOU) on November 27,2025, Carney all but committed to doing so. Among his agreements with Smith was support for: "Construction of one or more private sector constructed and financed pipelines, with Indigenous Peoples co-ownership and economic benefits, with at least one million barrels a day of low emission Alberta bitumen with a route that increases export access to Asian markets as a priority. The application for this pipeline project will be ready to submit to the Major Projects Office on or before July 1, 2026."
Although no private company has yet filed a detailed route with regulators, any new proposals would almost certainly be aimed at northern BC, especially given the focus on Asian markets. That could set up a political showdown in Ottawa, where Carney just achieved a working majority in Parliament:
"Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney secured a stronger hold on power – and bigger mandate to push back against US President Donald Trump. After a series of historic floor crossings and two special election wins supercharged his Liberal Party to a majority government.
Liberals were set to win two additional seats in parliament Monday, CNN-affiliate CBC News projected, bringing the party to 173 seats in the House of Commons – just one above the threshold needed to claim a majority government."
With support for the Alberta separatist movement at a five-year high, Carney's breakthrough is indeed timely, and it will take significant political skill to complete the tasks we first predicted he would undertake back in December of 2024 and again a few months later in April. While we received much skeptical feedback from those admittedly long-shot calls, subsequent events have validated the output of our lateral-thinking approach.
Our best guess as of today? Carney gets it done.
End of link. I am not sure why Canada is wanting to build a pipeline now that China is set to be an electrostate / sarc. Objectively speaking, this pipeline makes great sense, and that of course is why the crazy liberals will not IMO get it done. I was curious though as to your thoughts on this pipeline and port.
-
[QUOTE=WyattEarp;3064200]Yes, it's too simple of a narrative. Trump is just a blip in history. China is and will be a great power. Currently, they are heading into structural economic headwinds (similar to Japan's lost decades). How they deal with that and how they emerge from it will be very important. People unfamiliar with economics seem to be impressed with the paper economic gains that a closed economy can defying economic cycles.
I have heard now evidenced drone warfare would make a Chinese invasion across the Taiwan Strait treacherous. Pundits always discuss China being hemmed in by island nations that are not sympathetic. Due to strategic limitations, they have to make nice with their Pacific Rim neighbors.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=WyattEarp;3064200]Yes, it's too simple of a narrative. Trump is just a blip in history. China is and will be a great power. Currently, they are heading into structural economic headwinds (similar to Japan's lost decades). How they deal with that and how they emerge from it will be very important. People unfamiliar with economics seem to be impressed with the paper economic gains that a closed economy can defying economic cycles.
I have heard now evidenced drone warfare would make a Chinese invasion across the Taiwan Strait treacherous. Pundits always discuss China being hemmed in by island nations that are not sympathetic. Due to strategic limitations, they have to make nice with their Pacific Rim neighbors.[/QUOTE]It is good to see you post, Wyatt. You are dead on with China and their debt issue. I think it is way worse than Japan though. The debt China has accumulated looks to be substantially more than Japan ever did.
The other part, and it is well taken apart in this video, is the notion that China, at least as it is sold to the West, does not exist: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDvzhdgDqgE[/URL]
The bullet points: China has only been around since 1912 and only been under communist rule since 1947, and the notion that China has been this pristine civilization for 5000 years is complete horseshit. The video points out in a lot of those 5000 years that China was run by foreign rulers.
At the 10:35 mark of the video, you can see the government claim that 91% of the people in China are of Han orgin which is total bullshit too. China is a hodgepodge of various races and cultures that the government has to keep in check. That is not the case in an island nation like Japan.
Then you look China and population. They have 1. 4 billion people right? Well maybe not. There are quite a few studies putting China at between 500 million and a billion people: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTS38Ihqmtk[/URL]
Then there are all these young people dying in China and no one picking up their ashes: [URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELOqr4z1XLM[/URL]
The video also mentions the lying flat movement where young people in China are so filled with dispair they do nothing but lie flat.
Warren Bufett famously said that when the tide goes out, you can see who is swimming naked. Thing in China is they do not tell you when the tide is going out. In fact, they do all they can to cover up when that is.
But to me, the biggest selling point was just looking at all the street views on Baidu maps and videos from China coming out today. There is just not that many people there in comparison to a place that really has over a billion people like India.
The Chinese economy will probably be like a tire with a slow flat more than a big pop. That is how the slowdown went in Japan. But IMO China does have the potential to have a big pop and put the entire world into a recession.
-
Pipelines and port
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3064343]Here is part of a story from Doomberg about Alberta:
Political action inspired by the ghosts of oil-covered birds, otters, and sea lions has cost Canada's energy sector billions in lost profits, enriched its American neighbors by the difference, and stunted its geopolitical powereven as the war in Iran creates unprecedented demand for what the country could currently be offering. It's no exaggeration to say the fallout for the Canadian economy risks national unity, adding momentum to separatist movements in the Western provinces. With a fresh move afoot in Ottawa to undo the damage, and given the stakes involved, it's time to assess where the political puck is headed next.
Our story begins in Prince Rupert in northern British Columbia (BC), home to the deepest ice-free natural harbor in North America. Because it shaves about a day and a half off the voyage to Shanghai compared to Vancouver, the Port of Prince Rupert is home to a fast-growing container business. With a main‑channel depth of about 115 feet and berths in the 60-foot range, its natural harbor could, in principle, accommodate VLCCs, albeit not without significant new terminal and safety infrastructure.
Such possibilities have been explored for many years. In 2015, Eagle Spirit Energy partnered with dozens of First Nations on a proposed oil pipeline from Fort McMurray, Alberta, to a terminal site near Prince Rupert. Crude capacities of over 2 million barrels per day (bpd) were envisioned, with potential for later expansions. An on-corridor upgrader to convert bitumen to medium / heavy crude was also proposed, which would have reduced diluent use. Despite the logic of the proposal, the Eagle Spirit Pipeline never received federal approval.
[/QUOTE]My guess Carnay will not get it done but the ports in BC are critical in getting oil and CNG to Asia with Japan probably being the biggest market. Trump just approved a pipeline from Alberta to Wyoming for a friend of mine that will transport 300,000 barrels a day. Then it will be railed to refineries in the south. Not ideal and Not as good as the Keystone pipeline that Biden killed of 800,000 barrels a day but still good. Will create a lot of jobs and bring revenues to 3 or 4 states. Alberta and Trump have a good working agreement as long as they don't have to cross and liberal provinces.
-
Make America Great Again
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3064254]Iran is not a threat to United States. However, Russia and North Korea have been testing systems to strike us for many years. How come Trump won't say or do anything except suck up Russia and North Korea?
I can wait for the answer while Trump builds a ballroom and hosts a UFC event at the Whitehouse. You seem to know Trump well so can kindly explain what his priorities are?[/QUOTE]His priorities are to make USA great again and get rid of the failed policies of Biden. He also wants USA not to be woke. Pretty simple but not as easy to do as you think. I just don't think it is normal for democrat men to think a man dressed in women's clothes is a woman. Makes me think that you are leaving all the ladies for conservatives and saving the ladyboys for all the liberals. I am ok with that.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3064343]
End of link. I am not sure why Canada is wanting to build a pipeline now that China is set to be an electrostate[/QUOTE]ROTFLMAO! It sounds like Carney and the Liberals, like Biden and the Democrats had to give into political reality. When you take people's jobs they vote for the other guy. Or apparently in the case of Alberta threaten to secede.
Too bad the USA Didn't allow the Keystone Pipeline expansion to proceed and otherwise encourage the Canadians to send their oil south instead of west. A couple more million barrels of Canadian crude going to USA Refineries would be great for oil security. Which as we are seeing now is important.
-
WyattEarp and HotDog
Kudos gentlemen, for your well-written, well-reasoned and polite posts. I don't have time to post right now but am looking forward to jumping back into the fray soon.
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3064254]Iran is not a threat to United States. However, Russia and North Korea have been testing systems to strike us for many years. How come Trump won't say or do anything except suck up Russia and North Korea?[/QUOTE]You answered your question. Russia can wipe out tens or hundreds of millions of Americans with a nuclear attack, North Korea millions.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3064412]You answered your question. Russia can wipe out tens or hundreds of millions of Americans with a nuclear attack, North Korea millions.[/QUOTE]So, why would you have a problem with helping Ukraine fight Russia? You can't reconcile Trump's nonsensical actions in that conflict.
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3064423]So, why would you have a problem with helping Ukraine fight Russia? [b]You can't reconcile Trump's nonsensical actions in that conflict.[/b][/QUOTE]Absolutely I can! Why should the USA enable a war between Ukraine and Russia? People in eastern Ukraine were polled a few years ago and asked whether they wanted their cities and towns to be part of Russia, or Ukraine. Or whether they didn't give a damn and just wanted a decent job, a good pension and to live in peace. "Don't give a damn" got the most votes.
A work colleague of mine used to have a business in Russia. His ex partner is a Russian speaker originally from the Donetsk oblast. The partner says his relatives have hidden in their basements for a couple of years, trying to avoid the wrath of the Ukrainians. Anyway, if Ukraine gives up the Donbas, and becomes a non aligned country like Austria, and the Europeans agree to let Ukraine in the EU, quickly, this would be over.
The Russians are logical. They're not out in the streets yelling "death to America. " Some in the IRGC believe we're in the end times, and Donald Trump is the Islamic equivalent of the Antichrist. Soon the Mahdi will come out from among us, with Jesus at his side, and lead the Iranians to victory over the evil nations of the world, that is Israel and the USA. And if they become martyrs in this "end of times" struggle, they'll achieve the Shia equivalent of the 22 virgins and a laid back lifestyle in the hereafter. So why not explode a few nuclear bombs in the USA. They can probably do that right now with their 60% enriched uranium. Yeah, 60% enrichment wouldn't work with a nuclear warhead on an ICBM. But you load your primitive, huge bombs onto a few cargo ships and float them into New York Harbor, off Miami, etc. There will be no shortage of young fanatics who will jump at the chance to man those cargo ships and die for the cause.
So yes I [B]can[/B] reconcile Trump's actions. Do I believe what I just wrote about Iran? Not really. On Iran, I'm closer to Tucker Carlson / Bernie Sanders / Rand Paul than President Trump. I'm not a fan of enabling wars waged by Israel or in Ukraine or in any other place if they're not a real threat to the USA. If I'd been Dictator of the USA for the last 35 years, the USA would be on friendly terms with Iran, and Ukraine and Russia would be part of NATO.
-
3 photos
More MAGA Math; $300 Billion from Biden to Ukraine?
$300 Billion $300 Billion $300 Billion "given to Ukraine by Biden" to fend off Russia Russia Russia?
Uh. Nope.
According to Tump / MAGA Math, that must be something like a 2000% overstatement. And not one word about who really got much of that money? LOL.
However Trump / MAGAs calculates it, it's clearly another major repeated Pinocchio that fellow MAGA Math proponent Tiny has yet to mention no matter how many times Pinocchio Canada repeats it.
[QUOTE][b]How much in total aid has the USA spent on the Ukraine War?[/b]
+7
As of early 2026, the United States has authorized over $175 billion in total aid for Ukraine since the February 2022 invasion. This includes over $69 billion in direct military aid and equipment, along with billions more for economic support, humanitarian aid, and replenishing US defense stocks.
Ukraine Oversight .gov
+3
Key details regarding US aid to Ukraine:
Total Appropriations: Congress passed five key funding bills totaling roughly $174$175 billion.
Military Equipment: The U.S. has provided, or pledged, significant weaponry, including over 200 155mm howitzers, 40+ HIMARS rocket launchers, over 10,000 Javelin anti-tank missiles, and armored vehicles.
Aid Breakdown: Of the total, approx.
billion is direct military aid weapons/training, about
billion is economic support to pay government workers, and the rest is for humanitarian aid or security-related activities.
Where the Money Goes: [b]Much of the military funding stays in the US, paying American companies for weapons production, maintenance, and logistics.[/b]
Status of Funds: While
has been allocated, actual disbursements money spent and goods delivered by late 2025 were estimated around
billion.
USAFacts
+8
The US is the largest single donor of aid to Ukraine.
CNN
USAFacts
https://usafacts.org
How much money has the US given Ukraine since Russia's invasion?
Mar 14, 2026 BE Since February 2022, the United States has allocated $182.8 billion in emergency funding to support Ukraine and the region. Updated Mar 14, 2025 by the USAFacts ...
Council on Foreign Relations
https://www.cfr.org
Here's How Much Aid the United States Has Sent Ukraine
Disbursed $109B Missing data $3B Expired $4B Appropriated but not yet obligated $7B Obligated but not yet disbursed $65B
Ukraine Oversight .gov
https://www.ukraineoversight.gov
Funding - Ukraine Oversight
Status of Funds. Congress appropriated $174.2 billon through the five Ukraine supplemental appropriation acts enacted FY 2022 through FY 2024, of which Federal ...
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org
List of military aid to Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian war - Wikipedia
56 M113AS4 delivered from June 2022 onwards. 28 more pledged in June 2023. Mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles. 120 Bushmaster Protected Mobility Vehicle...
YouTubeFace the Nation
https://www.youtube.com
26s
How much money does the U.S. give Ukraine and where does it go?
Reddit
https://www.reddit.com
OC Here's How Much Aid the United States Has Sent Ukraine - Reddit
Mar 13, 2026 BE Like u/FroggyHarley said, and many many videos point out, I believe of the aid we give them, like [b]90% of that is paid to US workers,[/b] so if we give them a $2...
CNN
https://www.cnn.com
Arming Ukraine: A closer look at US military aid since 2021 - CNN
Mar 8, 2026 BE The US has given $69 billion in military aid The US is the largest single donor to the war-torn nation, sending at least $123 billion in total aid to Ukraine si...
The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com
What military aid was the US giving Ukraine and why has Trump ...
Mar 4, 2026 BE Missiles, mortars Washington has sent more than 200 155mm howitzers along with 3m corresponding artillery rounds, 72 105mm howitzers and 1m rounds, and upwards ...
WSJ
https://www.wsj.com
How Much Has the U.S. Spent on Ukraine in the War? - WSJ
Feb 26, 2026 BE How much has the U.S. given to Ukraine? Congress has voted through five bills appropriating a total of $175 billion for Ukraine in the three years since Russia'
The Kyiv Independent
https://kyivindependent.com
Ukraine open to buying US military aid package for $50 billion, ...
According to the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, the U.S. has provided $119.8 billion in aid to Ukraine since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in...[/QUOTE]
-
3 photos
You left out the reason gas prices rose under Biden. Pinocchios by omission?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3064164]Tiny: Was the ratio of California retail gasoline prices to the national average retail gasoline price lower when Schwarzenegger, the last Republican governor of California, was governor?
Gemini: Yes, the ratio of California's retail gasoline prices to the national average was significantly lower during Arnold Schwarzenegger's governorship (2003-2011) than it is today.
During Schwarzenegger's tenure, California gas prices typically hovered around 10% to 15% above the national average. In contrast, in recent years (especially since 2015), that gap has widened significantly, with California prices often sitting 30% to 50% higher than the USA Average..[/QUOTE][QUOTE][b]Gemini or AI, why did gas prices rise in 2022?[/b]
+4
Gas prices rose significantly in 2022 primarily due to a combination of surging global demand following the COVID-19 pandemic and severe supply disruptions, most notably triggered by Russia's invasion of Ukraine..[/QUOTE]There you have it, Pinocchio Canada and Pinocchio Tiny.
It was all due to Trump's Pandemic and Putin's invasion of Ukraine.
And now it is all due to Trump's Repub Forever War in the Middle East.
BTW, in just the few hours since my previous post citing the increase in the average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA thanks solely to Trump this time, it has increased again!
As of this writing, rounded up the the nearest penny, it is $4.48. Which is only $0.54 lower than it was at its peak under Biden when Trump's Pandemic and Putin's invasion of Ukraine drove it up to a momentary peak of $5. 02 in 2022.
In fact, at $4. 48 so far under Trump it is higher than it was at any time under Biden except for 2 months way back in 2022! And in those 2 months it was a maximum of only $0. 54 higher for few hours. See screenshots below:
-
MAGA Fuher sends More Trucking firms into Bankruptcy record highs
[QUOTE=Canada;3064079]Thank you for the information you provide. It clearly states that trucking peaked by 2022 thanks to Trump policies in 2016-2020. The next 2 years of Biden administration killed the trucking industry and they finally went bankrupt in 2025. Thank you for pointing out Biden failures on this industry. It is important that you aren't blaming Trump on this. [/QUOTE]No thank you, for allowing me to correct your MAGA factually incorrect post!
That really is some creative MAGA reading that you do. I read that it was a boom in the Biden years 2020-2021 and a total failure or as the writer puts it, a [B]"complete bloodbath"[/B] in 2025-2026, with your MAGA Furher's shit-show administration, all time trucking bankruptcy highs.
[B]Hormuz Crisis Pushes Struggling Trucking Sector to the Brink,[/B] Apr 9th, 2026 [URL]https://www.supplychainbrain.com/articles/43814-hormuz-crisis-pushes-struggling-trucking-sector-to-the-brink[/URL]. Thanks to the your MAGA Fuhrer and Bonkers Bibi, the conflict with Iran in early 2026 has significantly exacerbated the financial strain on the [I]U.S. trucking industry,[/I] driving up fuel costs and accelerating bankruptcy filings for small carriers and owner-operators already weakened by a multi-year freight recession [B]and a record high 8,000+ bankruptcies[/B].
All MAGA Fuhrer lies! So much for cutting energy bill in half and lowering grocery prices, LOL!
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3064631]There you have it, Pinocchio Canada and Pinocchio Tiny.
It was all due to Trump's Pandemic and Putin's invasion of Ukraine.
And now it is all due to Trump's Repub Forever War in the Middle East.
BTW, in just the few hours since my previous post citing the increase in the average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA thanks solely to Trump this time, it has increased again!
As of this writing, rounded up the the nearest penny, it is $4.48. Which is only $0.54 lower than it was at its peak under Biden when Trump's Pandemic and Putin's invasion of Ukraine drove it up to a momentary peak of $5. 02 in 2022.
In fact, at $4. 48 so far under Trump it is higher than it was at any time under Biden except for 2 months way back in 2022! And in those 2 months it was a maximum of only $0. 54 higher for few hours. See screenshots below:[/QUOTE]And what was the biggest contributor to surging global demand after COVID? Biden's American Rescue Plan and a huge overhang of personal savings in the USA!
Please compare average national gasoline prices to average California prices over the same periods if you want us to take you seriously.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3064628]$300 Billion $300 Billion $300 Billion "given to Ukraine by Biden" to fend off Russia Russia Russia?
Uh. Nope.
According to Tump / MAGA Math, that must be something like a 2000% overstatement. And not one word about who really got much of that money? LOL.
However Trump / MAGAs calculates it, it's clearly another major repeated Pinocchio that fellow MAGA Math proponent Tiny has yet to mention no matter how many times Pinocchio Canada repeats it.[/QUOTE]2000%? You're a little off on your math Tooms.
Canada is a guest in your country and you should treat him with respect.
-
Electrostates v Petrostates: Is Canada Playing Trump for the Fossil Fuel Fool he is?
[QUOTE=Canada;3064400]My guess Carnay will not get it done but the ports in BC are critical in getting oil and CNG to Asia with Japan probably being the biggest market. Trump just approved a pipeline from Alberta to Wyoming for a friend of mine that will transport 300,000 barrels a day. Then it will be railed to refineries in the south. Not ideal and Not as good as the Keystone pipeline that Biden killed of 800,000 barrels a day but still good. Will create a lot of jobs and bring revenues to 3 or 4 states. Alberta and Trump have a good working agreement as long as they don't have to cross and liberal provinces.[/QUOTE][B]Electrostates vs. Petrostates:[/B] China is building a new green bloc, while the United States is doubling down on oil. Canada's plot to sever international relations or USA MAGA paranoia? [URL]https://archive.ph/4YAkX[/URL]
[I]"Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney didn't come to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in January to offer hope. He came to pronounce a death. The liberal international order that elaborate architecture of institutions, norms, and U.S.-guaranteed public goods constructed in the aftermath of World War II was over, he announced, and the rupture was irreversible. But Carneys eulogy, sober and precise as it was, understated the depth of the break."[/I] [URL]https://archive.ph/4YAkX[/URL]
[I]U.S. President Donald Trump isnt merely ending a set of diplomatic arrangements or a particular configuration of great-power relations. [b]He is presiding over the end of the fossil-fueled model of industrial civilization[/b] that made the liberal order possible, profitable, and, for a time, politically sustainable.[/I]
Obama, Biden and Harris always did have a better "all of the above" energy future for American, than the simpleton MAGA "drill baby drill" energy future. As for Mark Carney's Davos speech, it tells a different and interesting new story for international relations with [I]the U.S[/I]
-
Is it too much, to ask MAGA for real facts and real math?
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3064628]$300 Billion $300 Billion $300 Billion "given to Ukraine by Biden" to fend off Russia Russia Russia?
Uh. Nope.
According to Tump / MAGA Math, that must be something like a 2000% overstatement. And not one word about who really got much of that money? LOL.
However Trump / MAGAs calculates it, it's clearly another major repeated Pinocchio that fellow MAGA Math proponent Tiny has yet to mention no matter how many times Pinocchio Canada repeats it.[/QUOTE]WOW, Deja Vu? First Tiny 12 and his asinine pseudo C02 emissions math and now Canada!
I believe I'm sensing, the very same MAGA math and "off-the-cuff" facts and incorrectness from Canada as well. But I guess, this is to be expected when MAGA simply shoots for the hip, and offers nothing more than hillbilly cowboy opinions, in a debate that requires the authenticity of factual information. I mean, even a correct spelling of his prime minister's name would be nice, if not correct.
-
Question for both sides
I will still never understand spending all day on a pussy message board talking politics. But whatever.
Questions for all of you.
America seems to be a tipping point right now. If shit really breaks down, are we possibly going to see the Land o the free become the next great cheap mongering destination?
The tik tok generation could shift on a dime to "hey don't judge I need to survive, and also sex isn't so bad anyway." we lose reserve currency status, with 39 trill in debt. All the sudden $5000 is worth 250 BR reals. You would create the worlds largest brothel. Not even the evangelicals would be able to hold them back.
-
Crazy orange is just ridiculous, like a bad dancer, one step ahead, one behind, but not good for tango, but bullshiting and mollahs just laughing at this old guy making USA now ridiculous. Make getting rid of him who cost us too expensive and to free Ormuz, what he is not able for. He also stopped to help Ukraine, but his war give now big money to Putin who was nearly broke, for also his war killing Ukrainian women and children.
-
3 photos
Who cares? It was a historic success. Thanks, Joe and the Dems.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3064647]And what was the biggest contributor to surging global demand after COVID? Biden's American Rescue Plan and a huge overhang of personal savings in the USA!
Please compare average national gasoline prices to average California prices over the same periods if you want us to take you seriously.[/QUOTE]A 2000% increase is what I estimated would be the Trump / MAGA Math figure, not mine.
Yep, Biden and the Dems' historic policy, legislative and srewardship recovery from the worldwide economic ravages of Trump's Pandemic kept the peak Rate of Inflation in the USA to an obviously affordable and tolerable momentary single-digit 9. 1% vs half the world's economies hitting double / triple-digits and for much longer. And they did it while recovering the millions of jobs Trump's typically horrific Repub economic and national security policies and stewardship wiped out and then went on in just 4 years to create millions more private-sector jobs than all three previous Repub presidents combined. That includes Trump, of course.
No other major national economy accomplished that historic combination of Trump's Pandemic recovery results. Hence, The Envy of the World Economy that Biden-Harris handed off to Trump, which Trump is currently shitting all over. Again. As predicted.
If I want an assessment for the best meeting place for kiddie-diddlers, I'll ask Larry Summers. Clearly, that's his expertise.
I don't give a shit about the average price of a gallon of regular gas in California. I would barely be talking about the price of gas or what the USA Stock market is doing at all if it weren't for the pea-brained Trump and his even smaller pea-brained MAGA Cult Followers insisting that both are the measure of presidential success and failure. It is delicious to me when their own pea-brained idiocy comes back to bite them in the ass. So I point it out.
I only give a shit that during and since Trump's Pandemic, Trump's first failed Tariffs and Trade War with China, Trump's second failed Tariffs and Trade War with everyone and Trump's unprovoked umptrenth Repub War of Choice in the Middle East my California rental property barely lost momentum in its decades' long steady increase while rent rolls in my area kept climbing. Which tells me everything I need to know about the jobs, wages and income conditions for my tenants in California regardless what the price of gas is there.
Oh look! The lion's share of gains in the USA Stock Market over the past 4 years as measured by the Dow and S&P 500 Index happened under Joe Biden with Trump"s contribution to it being those two deep plunges in it over the past 12 months, from which the market has been struggling to recover ever since the first one.
Oh well.
We tried.
-
The untold billions Trump has cost the world in this USA-Israel illegal war?
Speaking of MAGA math and billions of taxpayers money to an illegal and unwanted against Iran, the broader economic assessments suggest the total financial burden, including the global economic disruption, could range from $210 billion to over $1 trillion.
[B]$25bn or $1 trillion: How much has Iran war really cost the US?[/B] 30th April, 2026. [URL]https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/30/25bn-or-1-trillion-how-much-has-iran-war-really-cost-the-us [/URL].
So while Repubs are soft pedaling $25 bn, Dems and economists, believe that number to be a significant underestimate, and estimate it is more between [B]$630 bn[/B] and [B]$1 trillion,[/B] in damages to [I]the U.S.,[/I] let alone the rest of the world.
-
Yes Biden was to blame
[QUOTE=Spidy;3064638]No thank you, for allowing me to correct your MAGA factually incorrect post!
That really is some creative MAGA reading that you do. I read that it was a boom in the Biden years 2020-2021 and a total failure or as the writer puts it, a [B]"complete bloodbath"[/B] in 2025-2026, with your MAGA Furher's shit-show administration, all time trucking bankruptcy highs.
[B]Hormuz Crisis Pushes Struggling Trucking Sector to the Brink,[/B] Apr 9th, 2026 [URL]https://www.supplychainbrain.com/articles/43814-hormuz-crisis-pushes-struggling-trucking-sector-to-the-brink[/URL]. Thanks to the your MAGA Fuhrer and Bonkers Bibi, the conflict with Iran in early 2026 has significantly exacerbated the financial strain on the [I]U.S. trucking industry,[/I] driving up fuel costs and accelerating bankruptcy filings for small carriers and owner-operators already weakened by a multi-year freight recession [B]and a record high 8,000+ bankruptcies[/B].
All MAGA Fuhrer lies! So much for cutting energy bill in half and lowering grocery prices, LOL![/QUOTE]Yes Biden was to blame for all the trucking bankruptcy as you proved in your previous links. But I see you no longer post these links that prove Biden failures for the trucking industry.
-
Trump booming economy and record stock market
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3064631]There you have it, Pinocchio Canada and Pinocchio Tiny.
It was all due to Trump's Pandemic and Putin's invasion of Ukraine.
And now it is all due to Trump's Repub Forever War in the Middle East.
BTW, in just the few hours since my previous post citing the increase in the average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA thanks solely to Trump this time, it has increased again!
As of this writing, rounded up the the nearest penny, it is $4.48. Which is only $0.54 lower than it was at its peak under Biden when Trump's Pandemic and Putin's invasion of Ukraine drove it up to a momentary peak of $5. 02 in 2022.
In fact, at $4. 48 so far under Trump it is higher than it was at any time under Biden except for 2 months way back in 2022! And in those 2 months it was a maximum of only $0. 54 higher for few hours. See screenshots below:[/QUOTE]Gas prices higher by 1. 00 per gallon during the Iran conflict will cost the average person $30 to $50 more per month. The average person made an average of $3500 tax refund this year thanks to Trump tax cuts and everybody with a 401 K or retirement is making thousands monthly. Everyone I know is better off today than they were under the Biden failures. If you are retired you should be thanking Trump daily. The only people that aren't happy are the democrats who are being paid to protest because they forget a 401 K. Democrats are losers.
-
Stock Market highest ever
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3064662]A 2000% increase is what I estimated would be the Trump / MAGA Math figure, not mine.
Yep, Biden and the Dems' historic policy, legislative and srewardship recovery from the worldwide economic ravages of Trump's Pandemic kept the peak Rate of Inflation in the USA to an obviously affordable and tolerable momentary single-digit 9. 1% vs half the world's economies hitting double / triple-digits and for much longer. And they did it while recovering the millions of jobs Trump's typically horrific Repub economic and national security policies and stewardship wiped out and then went on in just 4 years to create millions more private-sector jobs than all three previous Repub presidents combined. That includes Trump, of course.
No other major national economy accomplished that historic combination of Trump's Pandemic recovery results. Hence, The Envy of the World Economy that Biden-Harris handed off to Trump, which Trump is currently shitting all over. Again. As predicted.[/QUOTE]Stock market highest ever under Trump and going much higher. Thousands of worthless woke policies by Biden are gone. USA economy is exploding after the Biden failures. You can keep being in fantasy land with Biden economy and continue to fabricate lies about Biden economy but Trump economy is exploding on every news station in North America. Pretty easy to see by smart people.
-
3 photos
Uh. More Trump / MAGA Math
[QUOTE=Canada;3064767]Gas prices higher by 1. 00 per gallon during the Iran conflict will cost the average person $30 to $50 more per month. The average person made an average of $3500 tax refund this year thanks to Trump tax cuts and everybody with a 401 K or retirement is making thousands monthly. Everyone I know is better off today than they were under the Biden failures. If you are retired you should be thanking Trump daily. The only people that aren't happy are the democrats who are being paid to protest because they forget a 401 K. Democrats are losers.[/QUOTE]Gas prices higher by "$1.00"? You were the one crowing about $2. 00 and $1. 99 per gallon gas just weeks before Trump's unprovoked umpteenth Repub War of Choice in the Middle East. The average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA is now $4.54 rounded to the nearest penny. That's quite a "$1.00" you got there in Trump / MAGA Math.
[B]Average tax refund is 11.2% higher, latest IRS filing data shows.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/17/average-tax-refund.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
But here's a shocker for you; the average tax return increased from 2023 to 2024 too! And without adding Trillions more to Trump's deficits! And without closing rural hospitals! And without producing less than a piddling 70,000 new private-sector jobs per month for the previous 15 months! And without jacking up prices for almost everything with across-the-board tariffs! And without increasing the rate of inflation!
[QUOTE][b]Average tax return 2024[/b]
+6
Based on IRS filing season statistics as of late March 2024, the average federal tax refund is approximately $3,050 to $3,138. This represents a slight increase compared to the same period in 2023. The IRS expects over 160 million individual returns, with many taxpayers receiving refunds due to overpayment via withholding.
IRS (.gov)
+4
Average Refund Amount (2024): $3,050 (as of March 29, 2024).
Direct Deposit Average: $3,124 (as of March 29, 2024).
Final Data: As of late 2024, the average refund settled around $3,138.
IRS (.gov)
+2
Key Factors for 2024 Refunds:
Higher Standard Deduction: The 2024 standard deduction was increased, reducing taxable income.
Inflation Adjustments: Tax brackets were adjusted to prevent "bracket creep," potentially increasing refunds for some taxpayers.
Refundable Credits: Millions of returns included the Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit, which boost refund amounts.
IRS (.gov)
+1
Note: Final, fully processed 2024 data (for tax year 2023) generally shows a slight increase in average refund amounts over the previous year, with average direct deposit refunds often exceeding $3,100.
[/QUOTE]On top of which two of the lowest average tax return years over the past decade or so were the final merciful years of Trump's previous disastrous Trump's Pandemic presidency. See graph screenshot below.
Now I'm going to gift you with a little extra tool to include in your Trump / MAGA Math arsenal that California gas prices harpies try to apply to the concept of "average" prices for gas but it just doesn't have nearly the punch as when it is applied to tax returns because we're talking pennies vs hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of dollars.
That 2025 Big Beautiful Abomination Bill For Billionaires and Fuck Everybody Else that you love so much gave hundreds of thousands of dollars if not millions of dollars in tax breaks and refunds to the wealthiest people in the USA and the World. That was not the case for tax refunds in 2024 or over the previous decade as seen in the chart screenshot below. Those 2025 billionaire tax refunds are added into the $200 tax refunds for tips this year for however many nail salon technicians, busboys and day-laborers Trump has not chased out of the workforce, adding to the record high business bankruptcies due to their absence.
So when you combine one person's refund of $100 with a $100,000 refund for the billionaire down the street you get an "average" refund of $50,050!
Great for everybody all around, right?
That phenomenon would not have applied to quite that degree in 2024,2023, etc. The "averages" in those years really meant something much more meaningful to everyone than these "averages" of today.
Lolol. I'll just leave that to roll around in your Trump / MAGA Math calculator for a while.
-
3 photos
Trump's Classic Repub disastrous presidency. It cannot possibly be unintentional.
This is why Trump ran as a Repub. That Party's historic horrible agenda and results sync perfectly with his own:
[B]I Asked AI to Calculate How Much Damage Trump Has Done to the USA[/B]
[URL]https://youtu.be/Rek6C_43SAg?si=2PkGk-dZ_2RaLjvC[/URL]
That is a must-see 32 minute video that should be required viewing in every high-school in America, right before the students are old enough to register to vote, with a special preamble emphasis that Mr. Trump IS the icon of icon template for everything The Republican Party stands for, loves and admires.
-
[QUOTE=Spidy;3064743]Speaking of MAGA math and billions of taxpayers money to an illegal and unwanted against Iran, the broader economic assessments suggest the total financial burden, including the global economic disruption, could range from $210 billion to over $1 trillion.
[B]$25bn or $1 trillion: How much has Iran war really cost the US?[/B] 30th April, 2026. [URL]https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/30/25bn-or-1-trillion-how-much-has-iran-war-really-cost-the-us [/URL].
So while Repubs are soft pedaling $25 bn, Dems and economists, believe that number to be a significant underestimate, and estimate it is more between [B]$630 bn[/B] and [B]$1 trillion,[/B] in damages to [I]the U.S.,[/I] let alone the rest of the world.[/QUOTE]Extrapolating from the impact on me directly and indirectly, I have no doubt in believing the global impact of this debacle will run into the trillions of dollars. We living our cosy lives are protesting about the fuel pump and the mortgage hike, but those many unfortunates who have lost their livelihoods or are now struggling to fill their bellies will be on a different level of despair. And for what? For the tail that wags the American dog and spits in its face regardless of what the American dog has sacrificed for it over decades.
-
3 photos
Add MAGA Myths to MAGA Math
[QUOTE=Canada;3064766]Yes Biden was to blame for all the trucking bankruptcy as you proved in your previous links. But I see you no longer post these links that prove Biden failures for the trucking industry.[/QUOTE]There were many business bankruptcies and failures in the wake of the global economic disaster of Trump's Pandemic, not just trucking companies. But there certainly wasn't anything about the historic Biden-Harris recovery from that total mess that would have caused any of those trucking companies to fail.
[B]Small trucking firms file wave of bankruptcies across U.S.
April 15, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/small-trucking-firms-file-wave-110000035.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAL3MyBR_rYrzTmh_f1UGFaVRI-cExPvIvcggnY2xdATx2cGUWicgKYhtvqTCoxtjyDyFoR351PVDIFKPkI4Vy0zg1GLHAnRspSly8lYJ4h-Jt-Ur6nzWNqIMNUakkIkKwZWLdoNL7H1T5ehHalQp5Dzm6SxwMKBaEvSqCX5GQcgc[/URL]
[QUOTE]A string of small trucking and logistics companies across the U.S. have filed for bankruptcy protection in recent weeks, underscoring continued financial pressure on smaller carriers as freight demand remains uneven and costs stay elevated.
The filings include Liberty Carriers Inc., NAS Logistics LLC, Golden Spirit Freight LLC, NV Freight Inc., Star One Transport LLC, and PSS Trucking Inc., spanning jurisdictions from California and Texas to Illinois and Florida.[/QUOTE][B]Freight bankruptcies mount in March as trucking, logistics firms file Chapter 11.
March 30, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/freight-bankruptcies-mount-march-trucking-120000643.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]Bankruptcies across the freight transportation and logistics sector continued to mount in March, with trucking companies, logistics providers, last-mile delivery firms and marine operators filing for Chapter 11 protection, continuing a trend that began in January and February as financial pressure across the supply chain persists.
A wide range of companies filed for bankruptcy protection, from small trucking fleets with only a handful of drivers to larger marine transportation operators and last-mile delivery contractors employing over 100 workers. Many of the companies said they intend to continue operating while restructuring debt under court supervision.[/QUOTE]The Bankruptcy King Trump has more than lived up to his personal history and reputation as a so-called president in this disastrous term as he did in his first disastrous term. Maybe even moreso this time.
-
China Pandemic
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3064819]There were many business bankruptcies and failures in the wake of the global economic disaster of Trump's Pandemic, not just trucking companies. But there certainly wasn't anything about the historic Biden-Harris recovery from that total mess that would have caused any of those trucking companies to fail.
[B]Small trucking firms file wave of bankruptcies across U.S.
April 15, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/small-trucking-firms-file-wave-110000035.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAL3MyBR_rYrzTmh_f1UGFaVRI-cExPvIvcggnY2xdATx2cGUWicgKYhtvqTCoxtjyDyFoR351PVDIFKPkI4Vy0zg1GLHAnRspSly8lYJ4h-Jt-Ur6nzWNqIMNUakkIkKwZWLdoNL7H1T5ehHalQp5Dzm6SxwMKBaEvSqCX5GQcgc[/URL]..[/QUOTE]Every intelligent person knows the pandemic was started by China in a lab financed by WHO. Every intelligent person knows Trump fast tracked the vaccines to stop this pandemic and the drugs developed under Trump defeated the Pandemic. Biden and Fauci made everyone's life miserable with their mask mandates and closure of thousands of businesses that led to record bankruptcy but despite the Biden administration stupid mandates we all survived. Not sure why you continue to post lies on this issue. No one is dumb enough to believe them.
Now after Biden failures the USA economy is booming. Wages are up, employment is up, taxes are lower and inflation is finally under control. If you didn't make a lot of money.
On Trump policies these last 16 months you are one of the few who blew it.
-
Obviously you don't work and pay taxes
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3064791]Gas prices higher by "$1.00"? You were the one crowing about $2. 00 and $1. 99 per gallon gas just weeks before Trump's unprovoked umpteenth Repub War of Choice in the Middle East. The average price of a gallon of regular gas in the USA is now $4.54 rounded to the nearest penny. That's quite a "$1.00" you got there in Trump / MAGA Math.
[B]Average tax refund is 11.2% higher, latest IRS filing data shows.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/17/average-tax-refund.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
But here's a shocker for you; the average tax return increased from 2023 to 2024 too! And without adding Trillions more to Trump's deficits! And without closing rural hospitals! And without producing less than a piddling 70,000 new private-sector jobs per month for the previous 15 months! And without jacking up prices for almost everything with across-the-board tariffs! And without increasing the rate of inflation!
On top of which two of the lowest average tax return years over the past decade or so were the final merciful years of Trump's previous disastrous Trump's Pandemic presidency. See graph screenshot below.
Now I'm going to gift you with a little extra tool to include in your Trump / MAGA Math arsenal that California gas prices harpies try to apply to the concept of "average" prices for gas but it just doesn't have nearly the punch as when it is applied to tax returns because we're talking pennies vs hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of dollars..[/QUOTE]Obviously you don't work and don't pay taxes or you would have saved more too. Obviously you never had a company and hired employees or you would know Trump policies help both big and small companies considerably more than the Biden years. You obviously are getting what you deserve in life now.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3064910]Obviously you don't work and don't pay taxes or you would have saved more too. Obviously you never had a company and hired employees or you would know Trump policies help both big and small companies considerably more than the Biden years. You obviously are getting what you deserve in life now.[/QUOTE]How did the inflated cost of jet fuel help Spirit Airlines employees and the flying public?
-
2 photos
The virus originated in China. But it was Trump's Pandemic.
[QUOTE=Canada;3064909]Every intelligent person knows the pandemic was started by China in a lab financed by WHO. Every intelligent person knows Trump fast tracked the vaccines to stop this pandemic and the drugs developed under Trump defeated the Pandemic. Biden and Fauci made everyone's life miserable with their mask mandates and closure of thousands of businesses that led to record bankruptcy but despite the Biden administration stupid mandates we all survived. Not sure why you continue to post lies on this issue. No one is dumb enough to believe them.
Now after Biden failures the USA economy is booming. Wages are up, employment is up, taxes are lower and inflation is finally under control. If you didn't make a lot of money.
On Trump policies these last 16 months you are one of the few who blew it.[/QUOTE]A simple Google Search will produce dozens of reports on how Trump's very own disastrous personal decisions, economic and national security decisions, laid the groundwork for converting a very likely manageable epidemic confined to one region of China into the Trump's Pandemic it became.
And therefore so will this forum be chock-full of reports on it.
Here is the short version of it:
Trump was more responsible than any other person on the planet for allowing an otherwise manageable epidemic confined to one region of China (until a vaccine could be invented and administered) to develop into the deadly, worldwide Pandemic it became, along with all of the global supply-chain collapses, massive jobs destruction, business, school and travel venue closures and the unavoidable skyrocketing inflation during the recovery that followed.
Here is Trump in a March 2020 interview describing the different outcome the world would have enjoyed if only someone in China had alerted us to the initial Covid cases two months earlier:
[QUOTE]"they should've let it be known it was a problem two months earlier. The world wouldn't have a problem. We could have stopped it easily. "[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.yahoo.com/news/bob-woodward-stunned-trump-told-091902598.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAL3MyBR_rYrzTmh_f1UGFaVRI-cExPvIvcggnY2xdATx2cGUWicgKYhtvqTCoxtjyDyFoR351PVDIFKPkI4Vy0zg1GLHAnRspSly8lYJ4h-Jt-Ur6nzWNqIMNUakkIkKwZWLdoNL7H1T5ehHalQp5Dzm6SxwMKBaEvSqCX5GQcgc[/URL]
And here is the only reason no responsible officials were in China and in those labs "two months earlier" to do the very thing everyone except Donald Trump knew should not be left to the Chinese to admit and alert anyone about:
[B]Trump says China "should have told us" about coronavirus. He removed the official meant to do that.
A US epidemiologist was embedded with the Chinese CDC. The Trump administration discontinued the position.[/B]
[URL]https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/3/23/21190713/coronavirus-trump-china-cdc-embed-quick[/URL]
[B]Exclusive: USA Slashed CDC staff inside China prior to coronavirus outbreak.[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/article/world/exclusive-us-slashed-cdc-staff-inside-china-prior-to-coronavirus-outbreak-idUSKBN21C3NE/[/URL]
Imagine if Biden, Clinton or Obama had pulled those monitors and safeguards out of China and those labs just months before the emergence of a deadly viral spread that those monitors and safeguards had been stationed there specifically to prevent and respond to ASAP. Fux News would still be counting every American death and every American business failure as a casualty to "Clinton's Pandemic. ".
But none of those Dems did that nor would any of them have done it.
Repub Trump did it.
And Trump has repeated this same pattern by tearing up the proven effective Iran Nuclear Deal that Obama and Kerry put in place and that Trump himself confirmed Iran was in compliance with in 2017. Twice. Right before he tore it up, pulled all the inspectors out of Iran and allowed Iran to do whatever it damn well pleased unmonitored over the past 9 years. He cannot stop himself from defunding and dismantling historically effective programs and deals made by Obama, Biden and any other much, much better president than he could ever be so the inevitable catastrophe will occur in its absence and he can then rush in and blunder, fumble, trip and fall into a much, much worse solution and convince dumb Repub hillbillies he "saved the day" from an Obama or Biden deal that was much better than anything Trump or anyone in his circle has ever or will ever come up with in their lives.
The conclusion is blatantly and inarguably obvious; if you wanted to avoid the Covid-19 Pandemic, avert the millions of deaths, millions of lost jobs, the school and business closures as well as the skyrocketing global inflation that followed, America should have elected Hillary Clinton for President in 2016.
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3064920]How did the inflated cost of jet fuel help Spirit Airlines employees and the flying public?[/QUOTE]Yes, Trump craziness fucked this US company with lost jobs. Every day, Trump and Hesgeth look so stupid and ignorant.
-
MAGA Fuhrer fuels waves of Bankruptcies
[QUOTE=Canada;3064766]Yes Biden was to blame for all the trucking bankruptcy as you proved in your previous links. But I see you no longer post these links that prove Biden failures for the trucking industry.[/QUOTE]Therefore your according to your MAGA Math, it shouldn't be so hard for you to provide the links / information and prove it, now should it?
In the meantime, I'll refer you the the [B]massive trucking and/or company bankruptcies and harm caused by your MAGA Fuhrer,[/B] that EihTooms has just posted and documented here below: [URL]http://www.internationalsexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?2467-American-Politics&p=3064819&viewfull=1#post3064819[/URL]
-
Wasting your time
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3064932]A simple Google Search will produce dozens of reports on how Trump's very own disastrous personal decisions, economic and national security decisions, laid the groundwork for converting a very likely manageable epidemic confined to one region of China into the Trump's Pandemic it became.
And therefore so will this forum be chock-full of reports on it.
Here is the short version of it:
Trump was more responsible than any other person on the planet for allowing an otherwise manageable epidemic confined to one region of China (until a vaccine could be invented and administered) to develop into the deadly, worldwide Pandemic it became, along with all of the global supply-chain collapses, massive jobs destruction, business, school and travel venue closures and the unavoidable skyrocketing inflation during the recovery that followed..[/QUOTE]You are wasting your time with these posts. Your posts are a laughing stock for the site. Remember most of the people on this site are intelligent. They know fabricated posts when they see them.
-
3 photos
Oh yes
[QUOTE=Canada;3065026]You are wasting your time with these posts. Your posts are a laughing stock for the site. Remember most of the people on this site are intelligent. They know fabricated posts when they see them.[/QUOTE]It was Trump's great economic results, brilliance in defunding and removing the highly effective Pandemic Prevention and Response teams leadership from those Chinese labs in 2019 contrary to all expert warnings for him not to do something so dangerous and stupid followed by his deft handling of his own colossal blunder for the following year that caused 7 million more Americans to laugh while they voted for an already quite old Joe Biden to replace him and do a much better job than Trump. Which he did, of course.
As always, we are all impressed by the links you provide for sources that substantiate and support your weird conclusions.
-
Trump was the driving force to get vaccines fast tracked
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3065095]It was Trump's great economic results, brilliance in defunding and removing the highly effective Pandemic Prevention and Response teams leadership from those Chinese labs in 2019 contrary to all expert warnings for him not to do something so dangerous and stupid followed by his deft handling of his own colossal blunder for the following year that caused 7 million more Americans to laugh while they voted for an already quite old Joe Biden to replace him and do a much better job than Trump. Which he did, of course.
As always, we are all impressed by the links you provide for sources that substantiate and support your weird conclusions.[/QUOTE]Everyone knows Trump fast tracked the vaccines and got a jump on controlling the pandemic. Biden put the disastrous mask mandate and 6 ft spacing mandate into law. Biden also closed schools and businesses and destroyed the great economy of Trump. A pandemic is serious and many died. Trump saved millions of lives with the vaccines. Biden destroyed lives and destroyed the education for kids with closing the schools. We have endured the pandemic but the school grades of kids nationwide has dropped to historic lows thanks to online schooling mandated by Biden. Red states are overcoming this but the liberal states are getting worse. Those are the facts whether you like them or not. Obviously you have TDS and you are hoping USA fails under Trump but that won't happen. You are terrified that Trump will succeed and make America greater.
-
Spirit Air was broke with cheap fuel
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3064920]How did the inflated cost of jet fuel help Spirit Airlines employees and the flying public?[/QUOTE]Spirit Air was broke with cheap fuel. They would have gone bankrupt either way.
-
True
[QUOTE=Canada;3065172]Spirit Air was broke with cheap fuel. They would have gone bankrupt either way.[/QUOTE]And Trump's stupid war of choice was the final nail in the coffin that finished off an American company and wiped out 17,000 jobs. Make America great again! America First!
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3065172]Spirit Air was broke with cheap fuel. They would have gone bankrupt either way.[/QUOTE]JetBlue and Spirit wanted to merge in 2024. Biden's DOJ, Lina Khan's FTC, and blue state AG's prevented them from doing so. That was a mistake. If say United and American tried to merge, yeah, prevent it. But a merger was the only thing that was going to save Spirit without a taxpayer funded bailout.
Too bad all the great Democratic Party finance and economic minds like Robert Rubin and Larry Summers got run off or got old. They would have stopped the DOJ from nixing the merger. If Janet Yellen and Elizabeth Warren's people in the White House knew their heads from holes in the ground this never would have happened.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065193]JetBlue and Spirit wanted to merge in 2024. Biden's DOJ, Lina Khan's FTC, and blue state AG's prevented them from doing so..[/QUOTE]The Sherman Act prevented them from doing so, fortunately.
-
No it wasn't
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065193]JetBlue and Spirit wanted to merge in 2024. Biden's DOJ, Lina Khan's FTC, and blue state AG's prevented them from doing so. That was a mistake. If say United and American tried to merge, yeah, prevent it. But a merger was the only thing that was going to save Spirit without a taxpayer funded bailout.
Too bad all the great Democratic Party finance and economic minds like Robert Rubin and Larry Summers got run off or got old. They would have stopped the DOJ from nixing the merger. If Janet Yellen and Elizabeth Warren's people in the White House knew their heads from holes in the ground this never would have happened.[/QUOTE]If JetBlue had merged with Spirit it would have went out business. Look at tickets prices: they are skyrocketing.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3065172]Spirit Air was broke with cheap fuel. They would have gone bankrupt either way.[/QUOTE]Jet fuel isn't cheap. Now, that we have Trump wrecking the world economy you expect exorbitant flight fares for what's left of the year. You can't admit when Trump is wrong.
-
Correct
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065193]JetBlue and Spirit wanted to merge in 2024. Biden's DOJ, Lina Khan's FTC, and blue state AG's prevented them from doing so. That was a mistake. If say United and American tried to merge, yeah, prevent it. But a merger was the only thing that was going to save Spirit without a taxpayer funded bailout.
Too bad all the great Democratic Party finance and economic minds like Robert Rubin and Larry Summers got run off or got old. They would have stopped the DOJ from nixing the merger. If Janet Yellen and Elizabeth Warren's people in the White House knew their heads from holes in the ground this never would have happened.[/QUOTE]You are correct. If the Biden administration had allowed the merger Spirit would still be flying.
-
Tiny's Magic MAGA Time Machine!
January, 2020 - Trump bans flights from China, and follows up with a ban on flights from Europe. This slows the spread of the virus and saves lives! Biden criticizes Trump for xenophobia directed at China.
March, 2020 - HHS, NIH, FDA, and most importantly, American Big Pharma begin coordination to fight the deadly COVID virus!
March, 2020 - Trump administration mobilizes emergency resources, like ventilator production, hospital support, with help from DoD and FEMA.
April, 2020 - Federal government allocates billions so companies would be able to manufacture doses of vaccines before final FDA approval. Unprecedented!
May, 2020 - Operation [B]Warp Speed[/B] officially announced. The Trump administration would compress development times and fund a number of vaccine candidates. Throw enough darts, as fast and as hard as you can, and a few will stick!
September and October, 2020 - Trump pushes FDA to provide Emergency Use Authorizations for vaccines. High profile Democratic Party politicians like Kamala Harris say they'll be reticent to take a vaccine that Trump wisely rushed through the approval process. Was this why many of eligible Black Americans in early 2021 hesitated to take the vaccine? Yes it was! Did some of them die as a result? Sadly, you can bet your boots they did!
December, 2020 - The vaccines receive Emergency Use Authorization and they start to go into peoples' arms! Hundreds of thousands of lives were saved! Only nine months from inception to vaccination! Absolutely unprecedented! How much longer would it have taken to get to this point if Hillary Clinton had been president? Who knows, but certainly a hell of a lot longer. She wouldn't have rolled over the FDA like Trump did.
December, 2020 - A Republican controlled Senate prevents President Trump, Nancy Pelosi and a Democratic House from passing a $2.2 trillion stimulus bill. This was way over the top and, as Wiseman Larry Summers said, would have increased inflationary pressures. That level of stimulus wasn't called for given the economy and jobs were recovering nicely.
January, February, March, 2021 - The Covid virus had been in the USA for a year. GDP in the USA actually grew during that year! It was up 0. 5%! Only a handful of developed nations had GDP growth during the 12 months. YoY consumer price inflation was well controlled at 1. 4% when Trump left office and the Republicans lost control of the Senate. The economy was in good shape.
March, 2021 - Biden and the Democrats pass the 1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan. That and a whole bunch of pork that followed added to inflationary pressures. A huge overhang of personal savings developed. When inflation took off, the Fed was asleep at the wheel. As a result, [B]during Biden's term, inflation adjusted wages for the Workingman fell![/B] That's why Trump, perhaps the weakest Republican candidate for president since Ulysses S. Grant, won the 2024 election.
January, February, March 2023 - FMCSA revocations of trucking licenses peaked at 24,000. Twenty-four thousand trucking carriers exited the business in those 3 months!
August, 2023 - The largest trucking company bankruptcy in history occurred. Yellow Corp. went under, and [B] 30,000 Americans lost their jobs[/B] as a result.
I hope you enjoyed this brief history, and apologies to Canada for repeating some of what he said.
-
2 photos
Uh
[QUOTE=Canada;3065171]Everyone knows Trump fast tracked the vaccines and got a jump on controlling the pandemic. Biden put the disastrous mask mandate and 6 ft spacing mandate into law. Biden also closed schools and businesses and destroyed the great economy of Trump. A pandemic is serious and many died. Trump saved millions of lives with the vaccines. Biden destroyed lives and destroyed the education for kids with closing the schools. We have endured the pandemic but the school grades of kids nationwide has dropped to historic lows thanks to online schooling mandated by Biden. Red states are overcoming this but the liberal states are getting worse. Those are the facts whether you like them or not. Obviously you have TDS and you are hoping USA fails under Trump but that won't happen. You are terrified that Trump will succeed and make America greater.[/QUOTE]Oh, and lookie! Some things went mysteriously missing on Tiny's Magic Time Machine too!
Such as:
[B]'This is a very bad one': Trump issues new guidelines to stem coronavirus spread
The president recommended avoiding gatherings of more than 10 people and also urged Americans to avoid eating and drinking at bars and restaurants.
March 16, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/16/trump-recommends-avoiding-gatherings-of-more-than-10-people-132323[/URL]
[QUOTE]President Donald Trump on Monday acknowledged the gravity of the coronavirus pandemic, releasing strict new guidelines to limit peoples interactions in an increasingly urgent bid to slow the virus in the next two weeks before U.S. hospitals are overwhelmed.
We have an invisible enemy, the president said at a news conference, where he released guidelines that called for people to[b] avoid gathering in groups of more than 10 people, steer clear of eating and drinking at bars, restaurants and food courts, and work or attend school from home whenever possible. This is a bad one. This is a very bad one.[/b][/QUOTE][B]President Trump has extended his stay-at-home guidelines.
Mar 30, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/03/trump-coronavirus-warnings/[/URL]
Well, guess what? Corpses continued to stack up, hospitals continued to be overwhelmed and Trump's guidelines continued to apply to many states in the USA right up until he led that violent mob of Insurrectionists into bloody battle in his War Against America on American Soil.
I don't see any "Biden closure and vaccine mandates" at the national or state level here or at any other time except for where it was legal and upheld by a Repub-majority SCOTUS regarding healthcare workers. Do you know why? Because there weren't any outside of his responsibilities as Commander-in-Chief of the USA Armed Forces and where healthcare workers and others were essentially on the Fed Gov payroll. See the A. I. Overview below.
Oh, and Tiny clearly didn't set his Time Machine back far enough to catch this critical detail:
The AI Overview:
[QUOTE][b]Operation warp speed was built on what Obama had set up years prior.[/b]
+12.
Operation Warp Speed (OWS) was [b]heavily built on scientific, logistical, and institutional frameworks established years prior, particularly during the Obama administration's response to pandemic threats like Ebola and Zika. Key foundations included long-term investments in mRNA vaccine technology, the strengthening of public-private partnerships (such as BARDA), and the development of pandemic "playbooks".[/b]
Congressman Bill Foster (. Gov).
+4.
Foundations Established Prior to 2020.
MRNA Technology Investment (2013-2015): [b]The Obama administration, through DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) and BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority), invested significantly in mRNA vaccine research. A $25 million grant was awarded in 2013, followed by a $125 million investment in 2015 to develop mRNA platforms, which were being tested in humans by the end of the Obama presidency.[/b]
BARDA Expansion: The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, which provided the financial and logistical backbone for OWS contracts, was established under President George W. Bush but significantly empowered and utilized by the Obama administration to accelerate vaccine development, particularly after the 2009 H1 N1 influenza pandemic.
Pandemic Playbook (2016): Following the Ebola outbreak, the Obama administration developed a 70-page "pandemic playbook" in 2016, detailing specific steps for responding to infectious disease outbreaks, which was passed to the next administration.
Pre-existing Moderna Collaboration: The NIH (National Institutes of Health), under the leadership of Dr. Anthony Fauci, had been collaborating with Moderna on mRNA technology [b]for about a decade before 2020, facilitating rapid creation of the COVID-19 seed vaccine, according to.
Penn LDI.[/b]
+5.
Key Differences in Implementation.
While OWS utilized these foundations, it differed in implementation by introducing massive, immediate funding ($10+ billion initially) to run manufacturing in parallel with clinical trials, rather than in the traditional sequential manner, notes.
YouTube.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
+2.[/QUOTE]There were a couple of minor differences. But Operation Warp Speed would have had zero to go on or start with had it not been for what Obama-Biden handed Trump in 2017.
Too bad neither Trump nor any other numbskulls in his Administration bothered to even glance at that proven effective Pandemic Prevention and Response "playbook" Obama-Biden handed them until sometime in mid 2020 when the USA Stock Market crashed in the face of morning American corpses stacked outside of make-shift morgues.
The A. I. Overview on the mythical "Biden closures, mask and vaccine mandates. ":
[QUOTE]Factcheck: Biden issued closure and vaccine mandates
+7
[B]Based on available information and court records from 20212022, President Biden did not implement national business "closures" or a universal vaccine mandate for all citizens. However, his administration did issue significant, targeted vaccine mandates, some of which were blocked by the Supreme Court. [/b]
CNN
+2
Here is a breakdown of the fact-check:
1. Vaccine Mandates (Mixed Outcome)
Large Businesses: In September 2021, Biden instructed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to mandate that businesses with 100 or more employees require vaccination [b]or weekly testing.[/b]
Fact Check: The U.S. Supreme Court blocked this mandate in January 2022, ruling that OSHA exceeded its authority.
[B]Healthcare Workers: The administration required vaccinations for staff at healthcare facilities receiving federal funds (Medicare/Medicaid).
Fact Check: The Supreme Court upheld this mandate in January 2022.[/b]
Federal Employees/Contractors: A vaccination requirement was implemented for federal workers and contractors.
CNN
+4
[B]2. Closure Mandates (False)
President Biden did not issue national "closure" orders or lockdowns requiring businesses or schools to close.
The administration encouraged vaccines, masks, and testing to keep businesses and schools open safely. [/b]
BBC
+1
3. Mask Mandates (Limited)
The Biden administration implemented a federal mask mandate for public transportation, including planes, trains, and buses, which was later struck down by a federal judge in April 2022.
CNN
[B]In summary, the Biden administration pushed aggressive vaccination requirements through federal agency actions, leading to a mix of legal victories and defeats, but did not impose national closures.[/b]
Fact check: Are Biden's vaccine mandates 'unlawful'? | CNN Politics
Sep 19, 2021 As part of his plan to increase vaccinations, Biden last week directed the Labor Department to require all businesses with 100 or more employees to mandate that...
CNN
US Supreme Court blocks Biden's workplace vaccine mandate - BBC
Jan 13, 2022 The US Supreme Court has blocked President Joe Biden's rule requiring workers at large companies to be vaccinated or masked and tested weekly. The justices at t...
BBC
A Look at the Supreme Court Ruling on Vaccination Mandates - Legal Aggregate
Jan 20, 2022 The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a Biden administration mandate that large businesses require their employees to either be vaccinated or tested once a ...
Stanford Law School
Fact-checking Bidens claim on mask mandates and vaccination rates
Jul 30, 2021 To be fair to Biden, some of the places with the highest vaccination rates, like Vermont, also have low case rates and fall under the category of areas with mod...
CNN
Covid News: Biden Urges Companies to Impose Vaccine Mandates
May 24, 2025 He ordered the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to draft a new rule that would make those requirements enforceable, a process that White House offi...
The New York Times
PolitiFact | Biden, Harris questioned Trump not vaccines; they back ...
Aug 20, 2021 I think they just need to give the authority of those restaurants or businesses to say, 'In order to come in, you have to give proof that you've been vaccinated...
PolitiFact
5:45
Explaining the Supreme Court's decision to block vaccine mandate
YouTubeABC News
2:30
Supreme Court Blocks Biden's Covid Vaccine Mandate For Private Companies
YouTubeNBC News
PolitiFact | No, Biden didnt promote mandatory COVID-19 vaccines ...
Mar 12, 2021 Our ruling A Facebook post said Biden promoted "mandatory vaccines for everybody" in his March 11 address. That's inaccurate. In his address, Biden said the Whi...
PolitiFact[/QUOTE]3:21.
US Supreme Court blocks federal Covid-19 vaccine mandate for large.
YouTubeFrance 24 English.
-
Merger
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3065202]If JetBlue had merged with Spirit it would have went out business. Look at tickets prices: they are skyrocketing.[/QUOTE]I have a friend who is a pilot with JetBlue. He and the majority of JetBlue employees are glad there was no merger for fear it would have been a disastrous mix of incompatible corporate cultures, with Spirit dragging JetBlue right down the drain with them.
-
2 photos
Hey, more great links!
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065234]January, 2020 - Trump bans flights from China, and follows up with a ban on flights from Europe. This slows the spread of the virus and saves lives! Biden criticizes Trump for xenophobia directed at China.
March, 2020 - HHS, NIH, FDA, and most importantly, American Big Pharma begin coordination to fight the deadly COVID virus!
March, 2020 - Trump administration mobilizes emergency resources, like ventilator production, hospital support, with help from DoD and FEMA.
April, 2020 - Federal government allocates billions so companies would be able to manufacture doses of vaccines before final FDA approval. Unprecedented!
May, 2020 - Operation [B]Warp Speed[/B] officially announced. The Trump administration would compress development times and fund a number of vaccine candidates. Throw enough darts, as fast and as hard as you can, and a few will stick!
September and October, 2020 - Trump pushes FDA to provide Emergency Use Authorizations for vaccines. High profile Democratic Party politicians like Kamala Harris say they'll be reticent to take a vaccine that Trump wisely rushed through the approval process. Was this why many of eligible Black Americans in early 2021 hesitated to take the vaccine? Yes it was! Did some of them die as a result? Sadly, you can bet your boots they did!
December, 2020 - The vaccines receive Emergency Use Authorization and they start to go into peoples' arms! Hundreds of thousands of lives were saved! Only nine months from inception to vaccination! Absolutely unprecedented! How much longer would it have taken to get to this point if Hillary Clinton had been president? Who knows, but certainly a hell of a lot longer. She wouldn't have rolled over the FDA like Trump did.
December, 2020 - A Republican controlled Senate prevents President Trump, Nancy Pelosi and a Democratic House from passing a $2.2 trillion stimulus bill. This was way over the top and, as Wiseman Larry Summers said, would have increased inflationary pressures. That level of stimulus wasn't called for given the economy and jobs were recovering nicely.
January, February, March, 2021 - The Covid virus had been in the USA for a year. GDP in the USA actually grew during that year! It was up 0. 5%! Only a handful of developed nations had GDP growth during the 12 months. YoY consumer price inflation was well controlled at 1. 4% when Trump left office and the Republicans lost control of the Senate. The economy was in good shape.
March, 2021 - Biden and the Democrats pass the 1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan. That and a whole bunch of pork that followed added to inflationary pressures. A huge overhang of personal savings developed. When inflation took off, the Fed was asleep at the wheel. As a result, [B]during Biden's term, inflation adjusted wages for the Workingman fell![/B] That's why Trump, perhaps the weakest Republican candidate for president since Ulysses S. Grant, won the 2024 election.
January, February, March 2023 - FMCSA revocations of trucking licenses peaked at 24,000. Twenty-four thousand trucking carriers exited the business in those 3 months!
August, 2023 - The largest trucking company bankruptcy in history occurred. Yellow Corp. went under, and [B] 30,000 Americans lost their jobs[/B] as a result.
I hope you enjoyed this brief history, and apologies to Canada for repeating some of what he said.[/QUOTE]I guess we are only left to imagine how many contradicting conclusions would be found from the very first paragraph or two on of any conceivable Real News source link for these random, disjointed and no doubt highly biased stand-alone comments / opinions posted by Magical MAGAs like Tiny and Canada.
Lolol.
Thank's for the usual non-existant links! Love 'them! Really, they tell us everything we need to know about the likely credibility of those "Trump saved us from Trump's Pandemic and Biden caused the Global Inflation that followed" Magical MAGA Horseshit Fantasies that continue to spread on places like Fux News.
-
1 photos
An actual, substantiated Time Machine
If you want to know why Trump's Magical MAGA Cult boo'd him when he mentioned getting the Trump's Pandemic virus vaccine that he and Melania took in near total secrecy, let's take a fully substantiated stroll down an accurate memory lane on the subject.
There's not much reason for anyone to bother wasting their time and money inventing a vaccine for Trump's Pandemic virus, much less taking one, considering the lies the so-called potus was telling America and the rest of the World about it for months and months while the corpses were stacking up and hospitals were overwhelmed, wouldn't you say? Well, obviously that's what Trump's Magical MAGA Cult was saying. And are still saying about the vaccines. Uh. Kind of a grossly mixed message there, huh.
[B]'It's going to disappear':
A timeline of Trump's claims that Covid-19 will vanish.
Oct. 31, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2020/10/politics/covid-disappearing-trump-comment-tracker/[/URL]
The above is an astonishing list of quotes from the World's Loudest Anti-Covid Vaxxer Donald Trump all the way to just days before the November 2020 election. All while the deaths were increasing instead of declining. Why would they decline? He was essentially telling Americans NOT to take the vaccine every time he opened his pie-hole about it.
[QUOTE]"Even without the vaccine, the pandemics going to end. Its gonna run its course. Its gonna end. Theyll go crazy. He said without the vaccine watch, itll be a headline tomorrow. These people are crazy. No, its running its course." - Oct. 16, 2020
Through Oct. 19, more than 220,000 people have died from Covid-19 in the US. With most states experiencing an alarming rise in new daily cases in recent weeks, health experts worry about a new wave hitting just as the fall flu season gets underway. Despite Trumps claims, the pandemic shows no signs of disappearing.[/QUOTE][B]Trump Baselessly Claims Coronavirus Will Go Away Without Vaccine.
May 19, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2020/05/trump-baselessly-claims-coronavirus-will-go-away-without-vaccine/[/URL]
But wait! There's more:
[B]Covid.
Birx recalls 'very difficult' call with Trump, says hundreds of thousands of Covid deaths were preventable.
"I look at it this way: The first time, we have an excuse," Birx said about the initial surge of deaths. "All of the rest of them, in my mind, could have been mitigated or decreased substantially."[/B]
[URL]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/birx-recalls-very-difficult-call-trump-says-hundreds-thousands-covid-n1262283[/URL]
[B]US could have averted 40% of Covid deaths, says panel examining Trump's policies.
The country began the pandemic with a degraded public health infrastructure, leading to more deaths than other high-income countries.
Feb. 10, 2021[/B]
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/10/us-coronavirus-response-donald-trump-health-policy[/URL]
[B]Trump Administration Abuses Thwart US Pandemic Response.
The Brennan Center is tracking Trump administration attacks on government science, ethical violations, and other abuses during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Updated July 26, 2021[/B]
[URL]https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/trump-administration-abuses-thwart-us-pandemic-response[/URL]
Yep. Trump defunding and removing the means developed by Obama-Biden to Prevent and Respond to the Covid-19 Virus contrary to all expert warnings for him not to do that and refusing to even bother to acknowledge the "playbook" for how to do it far into 2020 when it was obviously too late to stop Trump's Pandemic from mass murdering millions well into 2021 and 2022 along with the worldwide economic collapse and double and triple-digit Inflation that followed despite Biden's brilliantly managing to keep it down to an obviously affordable 9. 1% while continuing to recover the millions of jobs Trump wiped out and creating millions and millions more right into The Envy of the World Economy for America, produced one of the worst economic and national security disasters in history.
Will Trump's umpteenth Repub War of Choice, another one in the Middle East, and God knows whatever looney RFK Jr is up to with America's health, eclipse Trump's Pandemic on historic catastrophes? Only time will tell.
No, your eyes and brain are not deceiving you; my Time Machine is accurate and fully-substantiated while the Magical MAGA Time Machines are full of shit.
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3065202]If JetBlue had merged with Spirit it would have went out business. Look at tickets prices: they are skyrocketing.[/QUOTE]I think it's unlikely it would have. Spirit's business model was flawed. Spirit customers in 2025 paid an average of 9.5 cents per seat mile, compared to 13.94 cents for JetBlue. Spirit's operating margin, being earnings after depreciation but before interest expense and taxes, was -25% in 2024 and -20.25% in 2025. JetBlue's was -7.37% in 2024 and -4.06% in 2025. JetBlue's EBITDA margin, before depreciation, interest and taxes, has been positive for all full years except for 2020, during COVID. Spirit's was -7. 64% in 2024 and negative in a few other years.
JetBlue and Spirit competed on about 30% to 40% of Spirit's routes. Ending the cutthroat competition on those routes would have helped. As would switching Spirits assets over to JetBlue's business model. Admittedly that would have taken years.
The most important point is that if JetBlue had (or does) file for bankruptcy, it would be a Chapter 11, and the company would probably muddle on through and continue as a business. Most employees would retain their jobs, there wouldn't be a wholesale liquidation of assets, and creditors would still end up with something. That's not at all uncommon in the airline business. All the big carriers in the USA except Southwest have gone through Chapter 11 and survived. Not so with Spirit.
In general terms, we probably agree about Iran and the effect on fuel prices. While I have no idea whether Trump's gamble on Iran will play out,
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3064621] On Iran, I'm closer to Tucker Carlson / Bernie Sanders / Rand Paul than President Trump. I'm not a fan of enabling wars waged by Israel or in Ukraine or in any other place if they're not a real threat to the USA. If I'd been Dictator of the USA for the last 35 years, the USA would be on friendly terms with Iran, and Ukraine and Russia would be part of NATO.[/QUOTE]The current situation by the way is something that those on the left who are paranoid about carbon emissions should be happy with. If the price of jet fuel, gasoline, and diesel go through the roof, consumption will decrease. So anyone who lauds Obama's and Biden's executive orders to lower carbon emissions while criticizing fuel prices right now is a tad bit of a hypocrite.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3065274]I guess we are only left to imagine how many contradicting conclusions would be found from the very first paragraph or two on of any conceivable Real News source link for these random, disjointed and no doubt highly biased stand-alone comments / opinions posted by Magical MAGAs like Tiny and Canada.
Lolol.
Thank's for the usual non-existant links! Love 'them! Really, they tell us everything we need to know about the likely credibility of those "Trump saved us from Trump's Pandemic and Biden caused the Global Inflation that followed" Magical MAGA Horseshit Fantasies that continue to spread on places like Fux News.[/QUOTE]You're intelligent. It's contingent on you to disprove my arguments, not for me to find links in the right wing or center media that echo my arguments. Hint: You might be able to debunk my claims about the trucking industry. You'll have a harder time with the COVID related claims.
As to following through with some of Brix's and Fauci's suggestions, the states and cities were free to do so, and yes they would have and did decrease deaths. If you had tried to send in federal enforcers, like Trump did in Minneapolis, to enforce universal vaccination, school closures and the like, it wouldn't have been pretty. In my community the reaction to that would be similar if jackbooted feds tried to take our guns away. I myself have gotten all recommended vaccines and boosters and didn't hesitate to wear KN-95 masks. But leaving certain COVID measures largely up to the states and localities like the Trump administration did was the way to go. I do think Trump et al should have pumped more funds and effort into masks and tracing the spread of infections. But Trump's handling of COVID wasn't the fiasco you think it was, and I'm not sure at all that a President Hillary Clinton would have done any better. Red State USA is a far different from Australia, New Zealand, etc. It wasn't going to stand for measures imposed in those countries. And from memory I believe we came through COVID as well or better than the UK from a health perspective, and, thanks to Red States, with less damage to our economy.
-
I think it's unlikely it would have. Spirit's business model was flawed. Spirit customers in 2025 paid an average of 9.5 cents per seat mile, compared to 13.94 cents for JetBlue. Spirit's operating margin, being earnings after depreciation but before interest expense and taxes, was -25% in 2024 and -20.25% in 2025. JetBlue's was -7. 37% in 2024 and -4.06% in 2025. JetBlue's EBITDA margin, before depreciation, interest and taxes, has been positive for all full years except for 2020, during COVID. Spirit's was -7.64% in 2024 and negative in a few other years.
JetBlue and Spirit competed on about 30% to 40% of Spirit's routes. Ending the cutthroat competition on those routes would have helped. As would switching Spirits assets over to JetBlue's business model. Admittedly that would have taken years.
The most important point is that if JetBlue had (or does) file for bankruptcy, it would be a Chapter 11, and the company would probably muddle on through and continue as a business. Most employees would retain their jobs, there wouldn't be a wholesale liquidation of assets, and creditors would still end up with something. That's not at all uncommon in the airline business. All the big carriers in the USA except Southwest have gone through Chapter 11 and survived. Not so with Spirit.
In general terms, we probably agree about Iran and the effect on fuel prices. While I have no idea whether Trump's gamble on Iran will play out.
The current situation by the way is something that those on the left who are paranoid about carbon emissions should be happy with. If the price of jet fuel, gasoline, and diesel go through the roof, consumption will decrease. So anyone who lauds Obama's and Biden's executive orders to lower carbon emissions while criticizing fuel prices right now is a tad bit of a hypocrite.
Here's where I disagree: the attacks on Iran were not planned and thought out. It's reckless to create or exacerbate a conflict in the Middle East. Did we not learn anything about Iraq and Afghanistan? I can't seriously believe the war is front of mind with Trump.
He appears to be more interested in hosting UFC fights at the Whitehouse and a billion dollar ballroom that is unnecessary. He said that taxpayers would not have to pay (he also said Mexica would pay for the border wall). We've never had a president as unserious as Trump.
We would not be stuck in this mess with Iran if Trump had not destroyed the agreement that was reached in the Obama Administration. There's no way Iran will agree to something like that again since Trump has shown that an incoming administration is not obligated to honor a deal that has been made.
-
Clueless
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3065245]Oh, and lookie! Some things went mysteriously missing on Tiny's Magic Time Machine too!
Such as:
[B]'This is a very bad one': Trump issues new guidelines to stem coronavirus spread
The president recommended avoiding gatherings of more than 10 people and also urged Americans to avoid eating and drinking at bars and restaurants.
March 16, 2020[/B]
[URL]https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/16/trump-recommends-avoiding-gatherings-of-more-than-10-people-132323[/URL]
[B]President Trump has extended his stay-at-home guidelines.
Mar 30, 2020[/B].[/QUOTE]Just clueless!
-
Gas prices still cheaper nationwide
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3065203]Jet fuel isn't cheap. Now, that we have Trump wrecking the world economy you expect exorbitant flight fares for what's left of the year. You can't admit when Trump is wrong.[/QUOTE]Gas prices are still cheaper nationwide than California prices before the Iran war. Where were all your posts on Democrats gas prices? Or Canada gas prices? Canada and California with their liberal / socialist governments have the highest gas prices in North America. Seems you only worry about gas prices when they are high under Trump. No posts here when gas prices skyrocketed under Biden. I guess you just proved Biden ruined the world economy with his high gas prices. But don't worry. Prices will come down as Trump will see the world again.
-
One other thing Tooms. Eight hundred thousand people in the USA died from the COVID virus during the Biden administration compared to 400,000 during the Trump administration. Yeah, if the USA had aggressively imposed quarantines on cities and states when cases cropped up like Australia and China did, deaths would have been lower during both their terms. But neither Trump nor Biden nor most governors and mayors had the stomach for that. The majority of Americans wouldn't have stood for it.
Your contention that Trump's failures caused millions of COVID deaths is ridiculous. The virus didn't spread from the USA to China and Europe. It was the other way around. Using excess death statistics, the percentage of worldwide COVID deaths that occurred in the USA was 5.5%. Under 2% would have occurred during Trump's administration versus a bit under 4% during Biden's time in office.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065351]One other thing Tooms. Eight hundred thousand people in the USA died from the COVID virus during the Biden administration compared to 400,000 during the Trump administration. [/QUOTE]'Based on cumulative data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and analyses by The Washington Post and Science Feedback, more COVID-19 deaths occurred in the United States during the Biden administration than the Trump administration. However, this comparison is largely attributed to the pandemic lasting the entire duration of the Biden administration's first three+ years, whereas it was managed by the Trump administration for roughly its final 10–12 months (starting from the first deaths in early 2020)'.
-
I am here.
[QUOTE=Canada;3065342]Gas prices are still cheaper nationwide than California prices before the Iran war. Where were all your posts on Democrats gas prices? Or Canada gas prices? Canada and California with their liberal / socialist governments have the highest gas prices in North America. Seems you only worry about gas prices when they are high under Trump. No posts here when gas prices skyrocketed under Biden. I guess you just proved Biden ruined the world economy with his high gas prices. But don't worry. Prices will come down as Trump will see the world again.[/QUOTE]You are really playing "Twister" with the other 49 states are paying less than California. If it's market forces or just geo politics than I can live with it. We have outrageous gas prices now and the blame is squarely on Trump. Everyone knows that and he's mentally challenged.
What's more we someone with some focus not scheduling UFC fights at the White House or wrecking the East Room for a billion dollar "ball room. " What ever happened with DOGE and all of the BS about government efficiency. Does Trump even remember what he did in the first year of his second term? Or, perhaps he allowed Elon Musk a South African to run the White House while Trump was sleeping in the Oval Office.
I guess Trump needs hospice care in the White House a billion dollars is the right price.
-
2 photos
We intelligent posters already posted the reason for that.
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065351]One other thing Tooms. Eight hundred thousand people in the USA died from the COVID virus during the Biden administration compared to 400,000 during the Trump administration. Yeah, if the USA had aggressively imposed quarantines on cities and states when cases cropped up like Australia and China did, deaths would have been lower during both their terms. But neither Trump nor Biden nor most governors and mayors had the stomach for that. The majority of Americans wouldn't have stood for it.
Your contention that Trump's failures caused millions of COVID deaths is ridiculous. The virus didn't spread from the USA to China and Europe. It was the other way around. Using excess death statistics, the percentage of worldwide COVID deaths that occurred in the USA was 5.5%. Under 2% would have occurred during Trump's administration versus a bit under 4% during Biden's time in office.[/QUOTE]Now that the Magic MAGA posters have admitted they've got nothing to substantiate their BS claims and that it is up to us intelligent posters to disprove their BS claims, as we intelligent posters have been doing all along anyway, I must now remind you that my previous posts' substantiation already addressed the fact that the earliest surge in the most cases occurred in the USA after Trump's defunding and removing from those Chinese labs the means by which the virus would have been prevented from spreading from China to us and everywhere else in the World, "easy" as Trump admitted it would have been prevented if only he hadn't defunded and removed those means contrary to all expert warnings for him not to do that, and that the cases were increasing dramatically in the USA, not decreasing, at the end of 2020 thanks in large part to Trump having just spent the majority of critical Trump's Pandemic year 2020 lying to Americans over and over and over again that "It is disappearing. It will go away without a vaccine" while he and Melania got vaccinated in near total secrecy.
Really. It's right there in my quotes of the substantiation of the points I made, unlike the ones that are not there in the points you and Canada made.
See, that's why Trump's 1st term Mass Murder trajectory would naturally increase into the months after he got his ass kicked out of office and launched into his War Against America on American Soil. It was but one of a slew of historic Trump / Repub disasters handed to Biden-Harris and the Dems to fix, which they did to highest worldwide levels in record time, of course.
And, what the hell, while us intelligent posters are posting, why not pre-emptively cite a couple of fully-substantiated points about the true state of Trump's current National Security, Foreign Policy and Economic disasters so far in his 2nd term before the Magic MAGA posters assure us with no substantiation whatsoever that this is Trump's Golden Age of the Greatest National Security, Foreign Policy, Economy and Presidency Ever!
(See screenshots below).
-
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3065312]Here's where I disagree: the attacks on Iran were not planned and thought out. It's reckless to create or exacerbate a conflict in the Middle East. Did we not learn anything about Iraq and Afghanistan? I can't seriously believe the war is front of mind with Trump.
He appears to be more interested in hosting UFC fights at the Whitehouse and a billion dollar ballroom that is unnecessary. He said that taxpayers would not have to pay (he also said Mexica would pay for the border wall). We've never had a president as unserious as Trump.
We would not be stuck in this mess with Iran if Trump had not destroyed the agreement that was reached in the Obama Administration. There's no way Iran will agree to something like that again since Trump has shown that an incoming administration is not obligated to honor a deal that has been made.[/QUOTE]Actually we mostly don't disagree. I wouldn't try to argue with any of that, except that Trump's the least serious president ever. That honor should go to Warren Harding.
Trump's mistake was not realizing that if you're going to shoot something, you damn well better kill it or it's going to come back and bite you. Still, like I've posted here, you can't say with certainty that Trump's "strategy" was wrong. If Iran is forced to give up nuclear weapons and its proxies like the Houthi's and Hezbollah, we could look back and say Trump was a genius, or lucky depending on your point of view. I suspect that won't happen and the world would have been better off leaving Obama's agreement in place. Again, it's above my pay grade though.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065391]Actually we mostly don't disagree. I wouldn't try to argue with any of that, except that Trump's the least serious president ever. That honor should go to Warren Harding.
Trump's mistake was not realizing that if you're going to shoot something, you damn well better kill it or it's going to come back and bite you. Still, like I've posted here, you can't say with certainty that Trump's "strategy" was wrong. If Iran is forced to give up nuclear weapons and its proxies like the Houthi's and Hezbollah, we could look back and say Trump was a genius, or lucky depending on your point of view. I suspect that won't happen and the world would have been better off leaving Obama's agreement in place. Again, it's above my pay grade though.[/QUOTE]More than killing more than 150 Iranian young girls who were at school, this not ending war show to the whole world the ignorance of crazy Trump and his stupid team: Vance, Hesgeth, all Nobel awards for low level of brain, when total failure for USA: still mollahs, still same repression, still same unfound uranium, after spending billions, many deaths and for USA and our world paying inflation because of only how Trump is just a stupid guy following his war criminal Netanyahou who makes his business with war, just to avoid justice. If USA want to become MAGA, not shameful like under Trump, then only way is to get rid of Trump and his team. Never MAGA with him, just daily bullshits boring our world and lies compare to his elections program, not more. Thank him for inflation and lost jobs. When I pay gas, I think who deserve a medal to kill him.
-
And he is still 100% better for America than Biden or Obama was
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3065400]More than killing more than 150 Iranian young girls who were at school, this not ending war show to the whole world the ignorance of crazy Trump and his stupid team: Vance, Hesgeth, all Nobel awards for low level of brain, when total failure for USA: still mollahs, still same repression, still same unfound uranium, after spending billions, many deaths and for USA and our world paying inflation because of only how Trump is just a stupid guy following his war criminal Netanyahou who makes his business with war, just to avoid justice. If USA want to become MAGA, not shameful like under Trump, then only way is to get rid of Trump and his team. Never MAGA with him, just daily bullshits boring our world and lies compare to his elections program, not more. Thank him for inflation and lost jobs. When I pay gas, I think who deserve a medal to kill him.[/QUOTE]Yes all the things you don't like about Trump but facts are facts. Trump is still better for Americans than Biden or Obama. There is a price to pay for world peace. Obviously you don't want to pay it. Even UK are coming around as they have just sent in a war ship to Iran to help USA.
-
Biden responsible for record amount of deaths
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065351]One other thing Tooms. Eight hundred thousand people in the USA died from the COVID virus during the Biden administration compared to 400,000 during the Trump administration. Yeah, if the USA had aggressively imposed quarantines on cities and states when cases cropped up like Australia and China did, deaths would have been lower during both their terms. But neither Trump nor Biden nor most governors and mayors had the stomach for that. The majority of Americans wouldn't have stood for it.
Your contention that Trump's failures caused millions of COVID deaths is ridiculous. The virus didn't spread from the USA to China and Europe. It was the other way around. Using excess death statistics, the percentage of worldwide COVID deaths that occurred in the USA was 5.5%. Under 2% would have occurred during Trump's administration versus a bit under 4% during Biden's time in office.[/QUOTE]Yes Biden was responsible for a record number of deaths but if Trump wouldn't have fast tracked the vaccines Biden would have had 2,000,000 deaths. No way Biden would have gotten a vaccine out in 4 years term. But the fake news would never have reported it just as they don't report the accurate deaths in China (communist country).
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3065340]Just clueless![/QUOTE]Yeah, it is amazing what happens when government steps into health care. Before Covid, the DEA cracked down on prescription opioids and demonized doctors and the Sacklers of Oxycontin fame, and the end result was Fenatnyl killing hundreds of thousands per year. Portugal has a policy which treats those in pain and with addictions with compassion has 80 opioid drug overdoses per year while the USA has 100,000 per year. The real reason for this is the money and power our government gets in the drug trade. The government makes too much money in the drug trade to legalize drugs, and the vaccine trade is just as bad if not worse.
With Covid, we have the dumb Dems bringing up how more government officials in China would have helped. What would they have done? Would China have allowed them to help? Yeah, that does not matter; it is a way to blame the pandemic on Trump even though the pandemic started in China.
Then there is the "life saving" vaccine. And here we go again with Hanta virus. We need to vaccinate everyone all over again, and Moderna's stock is up. Thing is in this day and age, you know what the antibodies are and can produce them. In fact, when Trump was sick with Covid, what got him better was an outside infusion of antibodies versus his own. The concept of vaccinating everyone against Covid especially children was a waste of money and detriment to the health of so many, but we got people arguing here how great it was, and no one is talking about antibody treatment that unlike the vaccines actually worked.
That comes with a novel idea. You only treat people who are sick. Shocker huh? Here is a study that government officials dared not do such that they cashed in on the billions in vaccine. [URL]https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/antihistamine-nasal-spray-prevents-covid-19-study-finds[/URL].
Results from a single-center randomized controlled trial published yesterday in JAMA Internal Medicine show that azelastine, an antihistamine nasal spray used as a preventive measure, was associated with a 69% reduction of COVID-19 infection.
Of course, this study was published in 2025. If it had been done in 2021, those doing said study would have been tarred and feathered and called quacks.
You Canadians should be screaming at the top of your lungs to Americans to get government the hell out of health care, but they won't listen. Even after the Covid debacle, they won't listen.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065391]If Iran is forced to give up nuclear weapons and its proxies like the Houthi's and Hezbollah, we could look back and say Trump was a genius, or lucky depending on your point of view. I suspect that won't happen and the world would have been better off leaving Obama's agreement in place. Again, it's above my pay grade though.[/QUOTE]This piece from Doomberg has changed my mind on Iran having a nuke.
The goal of modern propaganda is no longer to transform opinion but to arouse an active and mythical belief. " – Jacques Ellul.
Just hours after the outbreak of war in Iran, we made a deliberate decision to plug into as much foreign propaganda as possible. We repurposed the all-powerful Twitter / X algorithm to identify a new list of high-signal / low-noise accounts with a pro-Iranian bent. Using a technique previously described here, we supplemented our standard approach to information-gathering with this new feed. In doing so, we were able to draw conclusions about the war's arc days before they surfaced in legacy Western media outlets.
Take the fate of the US military bases sprinkled around the Middle East, presumably built at least in part for an inevitable clash with Iran. During the first week of hostilities, our new feed was replete with shocking footage and satellite imagery that strongly indicated Iran had inflicted massive damage on these bases, far more than the Pentagon was admitting. Much of it seemed "leaked" from Chinese sources, having found its way to Twitter / X via popular Chinese social media outlets, and was mostly confirmed by Western-based satellite providers, at least before the Pentagon demanded they stop publishing it.
Because this material so mismatched what US and Israeli military leaders were reporting, we filed the information as a loose axiom in a developing mental model: Iran was outperforming expectations, a quick and decisive defeat of that country was not in the cards, and no amount of jawboning would alter events on the ground. Although, in many cases, it took several weeks, traditional news organizations slowly began to confirm what by then had become old news to us, culminating in this remarkable investigation by The Washington Post, published Wednesday:
"Iranian airstrikes have damaged or destroyed at least 228 structures or pieces of equipment at US military sites across the Middle East since the war began, hitting hangars, barracks, fuel depots, aircraft and key radar, communications and air defense equipment, according to a Washington Post analysis of satellite imagery. The amount of destruction is far larger than what has been publicly acknowledged by the US government or previously reported.
The threat of air attacks rendered some of the US bases in the region too dangerous to staff at normal levels, and commanders moved most of the personnel from these sites out of the range of Iranian fire at the start of the war, officials have said. ".
This affair drives the importance of not only casting a wide net for inbound information but also having a disciplined process to grade it for veracity. The Washington Post has historically printed many stories we find dubious, but this one revealed sources and methods beyond the standard "people familiar with the matter" trope, adding to its credibility. In other words, it rang true under our own internally developed mosaic.
End of link.
It looks like Trump made the same mistake Putin did. He believed his superior forces would overwhelm the enemy. With Putin, he thought his superior population and munitions would win out. Well, Ukraine has not only pushed Russia into a stalemate but is destroying Russian infrastructure with unmanned warfare.
At this point, the Trump administration better concede it has tried and cannot stop Iran from getting the bomb, and to be honest, given how deadly and destructive unmanned drone warfare has been, does it even matter anymore? Israel had the so called iron shield and that has failed as Israel has been getting pummeled by drones and missiles.
The worst kept secret in the world is that Israel has nukes and Iran does not. The idea was the Israelis were measured and rational, but the Iranians were crazed and out of their minds. Well, we now know that Iran has been holding back the means in which it could hurt Israel and its neighbors whereas Israel has shown no mercy to those living in Gaza.
Think about this for a minute. Iran was selling Russia drones. And now Ukraine is selling the USA and other nations drones. That is how woefully behind the times our military has been. We are still showing Top Gun versus the current reality, a base of nerds in Arizona remote flying drones. War is not being fought with aircraft carriers, submarines, and jet airplanes, and of course, that has been where we have been dumping our money.
Iran has told the USA to stuff it and even if the marines were to land in Iran, they like their Russian counterparts would be droned into the ground. At this point, all the USA can do is show it can hurt Iran and blow up their infrastructure. Great, what does that accomplish? Forget about getting the uranium now. Hell, at this point, that is fool's gold. Do you really need a nuke if you have drones?
Trump was sold this war by Netanyahu. We will blow up their leadership. Mission accomplished there. Then there was what would happen next: The people will rebel, there will be confusion in leadership; we can take their uranium, and we will suffer minimal consequences. Eh, wrong answer!
So now of course, we have the answer. The military and political leadership is lying again. Iran has done catastrophic damage and instead of admitting the mistake and turning and running. Trump and the USA are making things worse insisting that they are winning with Israel cheering them on.
I have read that the reason Netanyahu is fighting so hard is that he is afraid he will be jailed if he ends the war. I wonder if Trump feels the same way. Of all the dumb things the Dems did, the worst was raiding Trump's home and the criminal trial. Wars like this are the reason you do not go that far, but the Dems have no notion of going too far with Trump.
With Republicans, we would call Biden demented and the like, but I was like, why would you want to put this old feeble guy in jail? Who is that going to help? But the dumb Dems want Trump jailed, humiliated, and killed, and IMO that is a big reason why Trump is not backing off like he normally would have. Tucker Carlson said that when he talked to Trump that he felt Trump had no choice but to go to war.
Trump has had three assassination attempts and we still have Spidy calling him the Fuhrer practically egging on his fellow Dems to keep trying to kill Trump, and the libtards think they are the compassionate ones. Oh brother!
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3065476]Yes all the things you don't like about Trump but facts are facts. Trump is still better for Americans than Biden or Obama. There is a price to pay for world peace. Obviously you don't want to pay it. Even UK are coming around as they have just sent in a war ship to Iran to help USA.[/QUOTE]Your Trump failed for peace in Ukraine, only trying to rob poor Ukrainians, but made war to Venezuela to rob petrol and to Iran when CIA reported 0 risk, but just a liar and again failing versus mollahs and uranium, but making Ormuz pass blocked with big inflation all over the world, not only in small USA with less than 5% population of our world. No peace with liar Trump and making USA a shameful, robbering country, no MAGA, just daily bullshits from a crazy senile. Our world would be better without him, same than for Putin and Netanyahou, his criminal friends.
-
[QUOTE=TheCane;3065179]And Trump's stupid war of choice was the final nail in the coffin that finished off an American company and wiped out 17,000 jobs. Make America great again! America First![/QUOTE]TC, Spirit has been dying for a couple years.
It declared bankruptcy in November 2024 and August 2025.
The Iran war that began in February and the ensuing jet fuel prices, etc. Is only incidental to the liquidation of Spirit Airlines' assets today.
Someone seemed to imply that airlines generally go through Chapter 11 bankruptcy merely reorganizing and continuing to operate. This isn't true if you limp through two bankruptcies in ten months.
-
[QUOTE=WyattEarp;3065503]TC, Spirit has been dying for a couple years.
It declared bankruptcy in November 2024 and August 2025.
The Iran war that began in February and the ensuing jet fuel prices, etc. Is only incidental to the liquidation of Spirit Airlines' assets today.
Someone seemed to imply that airlines generally go through Chapter 11 bankruptcy merely reorganizing and continuing to operate. This isn't true if you limp through two bankruptcies in ten months.[/QUOTE]Wyatt, all that matters with job creation on this forum is who is president. It is blasphemous for you to say that company management has anything to do with job creation or destruction.
I hated Spirit when you flew coach. They had the worst leg room of any flights save for maybe Frontier, but when I upgraded to the big seats, they were great and even better than business class in the American majors. There is not much to mourn with the death of Spirit, but I am going to miss those seats:
-
Let's not make excuses
[QUOTE=WyattEarp;3065503]TC, Spirit has been dying for a couple years.
It declared bankruptcy in November 2024 and August 2025.
The Iran war that began in February and the ensuing jet fuel prices, etc. Is only incidental to the liquidation of Spirit Airlines' assets today.
Someone seemed to imply that airlines generally go through Chapter 11 bankruptcy merely reorganizing and continuing to operate. This isn't true if you limp through two bankruptcies in ten months.[/QUOTE]They went under on Trump's watch. This war or whatever you want to call it was plain dumb. No benefit whatsoever for the bus to attack Iran on Israel's behalf. They are using us to do their dirty work.
-
You aren't American
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3065489]Your Trump failed for peace in Ukraine, only trying to rob poor Ukrainians, but made war to Venezuela to rob petrol and to Iran when CIA reported 0 risk, but just a liar and again failing versus mollahs and uranium, but making Ormuz pass blocked with big inflation all over the world, not only in small USA with less than 5% population of our world. No peace with liar Trump and making USA a shameful, robbering country, no MAGA, just daily bullshits from a crazy senile. Our world would be better without him, same than for Putin and Netanyahou, his criminal friends.[/QUOTE]Your post suggests that you are not American. Hate America and support terrorist regimes. Fortunately USA has a president to bring safety to the world.
-
One last thing
And why drones are just as important as nukes. I did not explain this well.
Israel's heavy reliance on seawater desalination—providing over 80% of its domestic water—has created a critical security vulnerability, as five major, centralized plants on the narrow coastline are high-value targets for attacks. Missiles or drones could paralyze water supplies, with damage potentially crippling the nation's economy and military readiness as of April 2026.
Unlike the distributed plants in some Gulf states, Israel's production is concentrated in a few, massive coastal facilities, making them susceptible to coordinated strikes.
The reliance on desalination for roughly 80% of drinking water makes the entire population and industrial sector vulnerable to shortages if plants are taken offline.
End of link.
So if Iran really wanted to wipe Israel off the map, they would be attacking these desalination plants. They did not do so, but they could have. The point is Iran having nukes is now a moot point which begs the question: why exactly are we at war with Iran?
-
Yep
[QUOTE=WyattEarp;3065503]TC, Spirit has been dying for a couple years.
It declared bankruptcy in November 2024 and August 2025.
The Iran war that began in February and the ensuing jet fuel prices, etc. Is only incidental to the liquidation of Spirit Airlines' assets today.
Someone seemed to imply that airlines generally go through Chapter 11 bankruptcy merely reorganizing and continuing to operate. This isn't true if you limp through two bankruptcies in ten months.[/QUOTE]I'm well aware of what Spirit's history is. As I said, the jet fuel crisis was the final nail in the coffin for Spirit Airlines (among many), and it is Trump's war of choice that precipitated the jet fuel crisis. Sure, maybe Spirit was on the way out anyway, but that doesn't change the fact that the jet fuel crises was the final straw that broke the camel's back, and Mr. America First placed it there. In the final analysis, I concur that Spirit was a crappy airline anyway, and no way in hell should taxpayer money have been used to save it. Let bad businesses die and good ones prosper!
-
4 photos
This one could be your funniest one yet
[QUOTE=Canada;3065476]Yes all the things you don't like about Trump but facts are facts. Trump is still better for Americans than Biden or Obama. There is a price to pay for world peace. Obviously you don't want to pay it. Even UK are coming around as they have just sent in a war ship to Iran to help USA.[/QUOTE]Of all your Joke Posts, this one might be your funniest one.
You do know the President before Trump pulled us out of the quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice in Iraq, right? Yeah, his name was Barack Obama.
And you do know the President after Trump pulled us out of the quagmire, counterproductive War of Choice in Afghanistan, right? Yeah, his name was Joe Biden.
And you further know the president between Barack Obama and Joe Biden happily presided over the quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice in Afghanistan over the entirety of his so-called presidency, every day, hour and minute of it and all while he was telling dumb Repub hillbillies that he could stop any war anywhere in 24 hours with a phonecall, right? Yeah, his name was Donald Trump.
FUN FACT: Have you noticed that when Trump lists the previous America-involved wars that lasted longer than his current quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice in Iran has lasted so far, "the Vietnam War, 19 years, WWII, five years" and so on, that he never mentions the longest one of all, the Afghanistan War? LOL. Now you know why. Because he didn't / couldn't handle the most difficult part of that quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice that the two Presidents on either side of his disastrous so-called presidency handled better than any withdrawal from an occupied country by the losing side in the history of modern warfare; getting America the fuck out of it.
Of course, history will forever record that your "world peace" so-called president Trump not only didn't put an end to the longest War in America's history but he capped off his first disastrous term by pleasing his Bestest Russia Russia Russia Boyfriend Putin to no end by leading his violent, cop-attacking and killing mob of America-hating insurrectionists into bloody battle in his War of Choice Against America on American Soil in an attempt to overturn a free and fair election, overthrow American democracy, the Big Prize for Trump's Russia Russia Russia Puppet-Master Putin, and assassinate a few duly-elected American officials along the way including his own Vice President, has since then bombed 8-9 countries, only happened to be playing golf as so-called president when Netanyahu finally ran out of places to bomb in Gaza so thoroughly he was taking to bombing neighboring countries by mistake, has truly ended no wars but did launch into still another quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice, this time in Iran, that will most assuredly not end with as certain and confirmed, twice by Trump himself, compliance with an effective Iran Nuclear Deal that was brokered by John Kerry and, yep here he is again, Barack Obama.
Really, of all your Joke Posts, that one is probably the funniest one.
-
Democrat Wars, Republican Wars, and Iran!
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3065400]More than killing more than 150 Iranian young girls who were at school, this not ending war show to the whole world the ignorance of crazy Trump and his stupid team: Vance, Hesgeth, all Nobel awards for low level of brain, when total failure for USA: still mollahs, still same repression, still same unfound uranium, after spending billions, many deaths and for USA and our world paying inflation because of only how Trump is just a stupid guy following his war criminal Netanyahou who makes his business with war, just to avoid justice. If USA want to become MAGA, not shameful like under Trump, then only way is to get rid of Trump and his team. Never MAGA with him, just daily bullshits boring our world and lies compare to his elections program, not more. Thank him for inflation and lost jobs. When I pay gas, I think who deserve a medal to kill him.[/QUOTE]Vance, much more so than anyone else in the Trump administration, did his best to keep this war from happening.
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3065517]Of all your Joke Posts, this one might be your funniest one.
You do know the President before Trump pulled us out of the quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice in Iraq, right? Yeah, his name was Barack Obama.
And you do know the President after Trump pulled us out of the quagmire, counterproductive War of Choice in Afghanistan, right? Yeah, his name was Joe Biden.
And you further know the president between Barack Obama and Joe Biden happily presided over the quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice in Afghanistan over the entirety of his so-called presidency, every day, hour and minute of it and all while he was telling dumb Repub hillbillies that he could stop any war anywhere in 24 hours with a phonecall, right? Yeah, his name was Donald Trump.
FUN FACT: Have you noticed that when Trump lists the previous America-involved wars that lasted longer than his current quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice in Iran has lasted so far, "the Vietnam War, 19 years, WWII, five years" and so on, that he never mentions the longest one of all, the Afghanistan War? LOL. Now you know why. Because he didn't / couldn't handle the most difficult part of that quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice that the two Presidents on either side of his disastrous so-called presidency handled better than any withdrawal from an occupied country by the losing side in the history of modern warfare; getting America the fuck out of it.
Of course, history will forever record that your "world peace" so-called president Trump not only didn't put an end to the longest War in America's history but he capped off his first disastrous term by pleasing his Bestest Russia Russia Russia Boyfriend Putin to no end by leading his violent, cop-attacking and killing mob of America-hating insurrectionists into bloody battle in his War of Choice Against America on American Soil in an attempt to overturn a free and fair election, overthrow American democracy, the Big Prize for Trump's Russia Russia Russia Puppet-Master Putin, and assassinate a few duly-elected American officials along the way including his own Vice President, has since then bombed 8-9 countries, only happened to be playing golf as so-called president when Netanyahu finally ran out of places to bomb in Gaza so thoroughly he was taking to bombing neighboring countries by mistake, has truly ended no wars but did launch into still another quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice, this time in Iran, that will most assuredly not end with as certain and confirmed, twice by Trump himself, compliance with an effective Iran Nuclear Deal that was brokered by John Kerry and, yep here he is again, Barack Obama.
Really, of all your Joke Posts, that one is probably the funniest one.[/QUOTE]Here are the number of American servicemen who died in various wars:
Democrat Woodrow Wilson's War: 116,516.
Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt's War: 405,399.
Democrat Harry Truman's War: 36,574.
Democrat Lyndon Baines Johnson's War: 58,209.
Republican George H. W. Bush's War: 382.
Republican George W. Bush's Wars: 6,821.
[B]Donald J. Trump's War: 13[/B]
Bloodthirsty Democrats!
Before you came back with Lincoln being Republican, which I thought was odd considering most in your party say 19th century Republicans would be Democrats today. Well, I'll accept that, that Lincoln's relevant. But only if you agree that Trump's a Democrat, as evidenced by his party registration in 2001 to 2009 and his enthusiasm expressed then for a wealth tax and partial birth abortion.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3065512]And why drones are just as important as nukes. I did not explain this well.
Israel's heavy reliance on seawater desalinationproviding over 80% of its domestic waterhas created a critical security vulnerability, as five major, centralized plants on the narrow coastline are high-value targets for attacks. Missiles or drones could paralyze water supplies, with damage potentially crippling the nation's economy and military readiness as of April 2026.
Unlike the distributed plants in some Gulf states, Israel's production is concentrated in a few, massive coastal facilities, making them susceptible to coordinated strikes.
The reliance on desalination for roughly 80% of drinking water makes the entire population and industrial sector vulnerable to shortages if plants are taken offline.
End of link.
So if Iran really wanted to wipe Israel off the map, they would be attacking these desalination plants. They did not do so, but they could have. The point is Iran having nukes is now a moot point which begs the question: why exactly are we at war with Iran?[/QUOTE]Interesting. So apparently the Iranians in power don't have a death wish. This is contrary to the assumption of Trump, Netanyahu and the neoconservatives that Iran might go full fledged David Koresh or Jim Jones if it had a nuclear arsenal.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3065486]This piece from Doomberg has changed my mind on Iran having a nuke.
The goal of modern propaganda is no longer to transform opinion but to arouse an active and mythical belief. " Jacques Ellul.
Just hours after the outbreak of war in Iran, we made a deliberate decision to plug into as much foreign propaganda as possible. We repurposed the all-powerful Twitter / X algorithm to identify a new list of high-signal / low-noise accounts with a pro-Iranian bent. Using a technique previously described here, we supplemented our standard approach to information-gathering with this new feed. In doing so, we were able to draw conclusions about the war's arc days before they surfaced in legacy Western media outlets.
Take the fate of the US military bases sprinkled around the Middle East, presumably built at least in part for an inevitable clash with Iran. During the first week of hostilities, our new feed was replete with shocking footage and satellite imagery that strongly indicated Iran had inflicted massive damage on these bases, far more than the Pentagon was admitting. Much of it seemed "leaked" from Chinese sources, having found its way to Twitter / X via popular Chinese social media outlets, and was mostly confirmed by Western-based satellite providers, at least before the Pentagon demanded they stop publishing it.
Because this material so mismatched what US and Israeli military leaders were reporting, we filed the information as a loose axiom in a developing mental model: Iran was outperforming expectations, a quick and decisive defeat of that country was not in the cards, and no amount of jawboning would alter events on the ground. Although, in many cases, it took several weeks, traditional news organizations slowly began to confirm what by then had become old news to us, culminating in this remarkable investigation by The Washington Post, published Wednesday:
"Iranian airstrikes have damaged or destroyed at least 228 structures or pieces of equipment at US military sites across the Middle East since the war began, hitting hangars, barracks, fuel depots, aircraft and key radar, communications and air defense equipment, according to a Washington Post analysis of satellite imagery. The amount of destruction is far larger than what has been publicly acknowledged by the US government or previously reported.
The threat of air attacks rendered some of the US bases in the region too dangerous to staff at normal levels, and commanders moved most of the personnel from these sites out of the range of Iranian fire at the start of the war, officials have said. ".
This affair drives the importance of not only casting a wide net for inbound information but also having a disciplined process to grade it for veracity. The Washington Post has historically printed many stories we find dubious, but this one revealed sources and methods beyond the standard "people familiar with the matter" trope, adding to its credibility. In other words, it rang true under our own internally developed mosaic.
End of link.
It looks like Trump made the same mistake Putin did. He believed his superior forces would overwhelm the enemy. With Putin, he thought his superior population and munitions would win out. Well, Ukraine has not only pushed Russia into a stalemate but is destroying Russian infrastructure with unmanned warfare.
At this point, the Trump administration better concede it has tried and cannot stop Iran from getting the bomb, and to be honest, given how deadly and destructive unmanned drone warfare has been, does it even matter anymore? Israel had the so called iron shield and that has failed as Israel has been getting pummeled by drones and missiles.
The worst kept secret in the world is that Israel has nukes and Iran does not. The idea was the Israelis were measured and rational, but the Iranians were crazed and out of their minds. Well, we now know that Iran has been holding back the means in which it could hurt Israel and its neighbors whereas Israel has shown no mercy to those living in Gaza.
Think about this for a minute. Iran was selling Russia drones. And now Ukraine is selling the USA and other nations drones. That is how woefully behind the times our military has been. We are still showing Top Gun versus the current reality, a base of nerds in Arizona remote flying drones. War is not being fought with aircraft carriers, submarines, and jet airplanes, and of course, that has been where we have been dumping our money.
Iran has told the USA to stuff it and even if the marines were to land in Iran, they like their Russian counterparts would be droned into the ground. At this point, all the USA can do is show it can hurt Iran and blow up their infrastructure. Great, what does that accomplish? Forget about getting the uranium now. Hell, at this point, that is fool's gold. Do you really need a nuke if you have drones?
Trump was sold this war by Netanyahu. We will blow up their leadership. Mission accomplished there. Then there was what would happen next: The people will rebel, there will be confusion in leadership; we can take their uranium, and we will suffer minimal consequences. Eh, wrong answer!
So now of course, we have the answer. The military and political leadership is lying again. Iran has done catastrophic damage and instead of admitting the mistake and turning and running. Trump and the USA are making things worse insisting that they are winning with Israel cheering them on.
I have read that the reason Netanyahu is fighting so hard is that he is afraid he will be jailed if he ends the war. I wonder if Trump feels the same way. Of all the dumb things the Dems did, the worst was raiding Trump's home and the criminal trial. Wars like this are the reason you do not go that far, but the Dems have no notion of going too far with Trump.
With Republicans, we would call Biden demented and the like, but I was like, why would you want to put this old feeble guy in jail? Who is that going to help? But the dumb Dems want Trump jailed, humiliated, and killed, and IMO that is a big reason why Trump is not backing off like he normally would have. Tucker Carlson said that when he talked to Trump that he felt Trump had no choice but to go to war.
Trump has had three assassination attempts and we still have Spidy calling him the Fuhrer practically egging on his fellow Dems to keep trying to kill Trump, and the libtards think they are the compassionate ones. Oh brother![/QUOTE]I understand that USA Servicemen were sheltering in hotel rooms in a couple of Middle Eastern countries, so they wouldn't be wiped out along with their bases.
I listened to Carlson's comments in a 2 hour interview by a NYT journalist. He appeared to believe Trump was led by a mystical or higher power to bomb Iran the second time around. That's what Carlson sensed. Carlson's a devout Christian and probably believes there's divine influence over Trump. Or maybe in this case, given his position on the Iran war, be believes evil's influencing Trump. I believe Allah has moved Trump to war with Iran preliminary to the coming out of the Mahdi and the second coming of Christ, who will both fight Israel and the Great Satan in a victorious war. Not really, but some Iranians believe that.
I believe having a nuclear arsenal is still highly desirable, even in the age of drones. When you have nukes, nobody fucks with you. Which is why you don't see Trump fucking with North Korea or Russia or militarily with China.
I agree about Netanyahu. The USA shouldn't be fighting Israel's wars.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3065390]Now that the Magic MAGA posters have admitted they've got nothing to substantiate their BS claims and that it is up to us intelligent posters to disprove their BS claims, as we intelligent posters have been doing all along anyway, I must now remind you that my previous posts' substantiation already addressed the fact that the earliest surge in the most cases occurred in the USA after Trump's defunding and removing from those Chinese labs the means by which the virus would have been prevented from spreading from China to us and everywhere else in the World, "easy" as Trump admitted it would have been prevented if only he hadn't defunded and removed those means contrary to all expert warnings for him not to do that, and that the cases were increasing dramatically in the USA, not decreasing, at the end of 2020 thanks in large part to Trump having just spent the majority of critical Trump's Pandemic year 2020 lying to Americans over and over and over again that "It is disappearing. It will go away without a vaccine" while he and Melania got vaccinated in near total secrecy.
Really. It's right there in my quotes of the substantiation of the points I made, unlike the ones that are not there in the points you and Canada made.
See, that's why Trump's 1st term Mass Murder trajectory would naturally increase into the months after he got his ass kicked out of office and launched into his War Against America on American Soil. It was but one of a slew of historic Trump / Repub disasters handed to Biden-Harris and the Dems to fix, which they did to highest worldwide levels in record time, of course.
And, what the hell, while us intelligent posters are posting, why not pre-emptively cite a couple of fully-substantiated points about the true state of Trump's current National Security, Foreign Policy and Economic disasters so far in his 2nd term before the Magic MAGA posters assure us with no substantiation whatsoever that this is Trump's Golden Age of the Greatest National Security, Foreign Policy, Economy and Presidency Ever!
(See screenshots below).[/QUOTE]Basically your argument is that some hotshot American immunologists, virologists and public health hotshots working at the CDC office in Beijing would have heroically prevented the pandemic from ever happening. Nice plot for a Hollywood movie, and extremely unlikely in real life.
-
3 photos
World Peace Trump's Mass Murder Count is Soaring!
Add these expert estimates of hundreds of thousands of deaths currently and millions and millions more deaths in the future to the millions of Trump's Mass Murder victim deaths he racked up already after one of his previous "defunding frenzy" efforts led directly to creating Trump's Pandemic.
See, unless Trump defunds these programs that have kept Americans and other people around the world alive, healthier and safer, where will his Trillions of Dollars in corporate welfare and more tax cuts for himself, his Crime Family and other billionaires come from?
The A. I. Overview:
[QUOTE] [b]How many deaths due to Trump defunding USAID?[/B]
+11
Estimates regarding the death toll following the Trump administration's decision to dismantle and defund USAID (United States Agency for International Development) range from hundreds of thousands in the first year to a projected 14 million by 2030.
Congressman Brad Sherman | (.gov)
+1
Current Estimated Deaths
As of early 2026, various independent modeling tools and research institutions have tracked the immediate human cost of the funding cuts:
762,000+ Deaths: According to the ImpactCounter dashboard (as of January 2026), over 762,000 people have died due to the USAID funding pause and subsequent cancellations.
600,000+ Deaths: A November 2025 estimate cited by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health placed the toll at 600,000, with roughly two-thirds of those being children.
Specific Causes: According to the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP), modeled deaths include:
174,000+ from PEPFAR-related HIV/AIDS program disruptions.
164,000+ child deaths from pneumonia.
125,000+ child deaths from diarrhea.
70,000+ deaths from malaria.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
+4
Long-Term Projections
If the dismantling of the agency continues, peer-reviewed studies and international organizations project a much higher cumulative toll:
14 Million by 2030: A study published in The Lancet in July 2025 forecasted that steep funding cuts could result in over 14 million additional deaths by 2030, including 4.5 million children under five.
9.4 Million by 2030: A second Lancet study updated in February 2026 lowered this projection slightly to 9.4 million additional deaths, accounting for some mitigation efforts by other donor countries.
200,000 Child Deaths Annually: Oxfam warns that 2025 could see the first rise in child mortality this century, with one child under five potentially dying every 40 seconds due to the cuts by 2030.
The Lancet
+5
Official Stance
Despite these estimates from top research institutions, the Trump administration has officially denied that any deaths have occurred. Secretary of State Marco Rubio testified to Congress that "no one has died" and "no children are dying on his watch" as a result of the agency's closure. However, experts note that the closure of clinics and NGOs has also disabled the infrastructure necessary to accurately track real-time mortality data in many affected regions.
Congressman Brad Sherman | (.gov)
+3
USAID shutdown has led to hundreds of thousands of deaths
Nov 20, 2025 The dismantling of USAID, according to models from Boston University epidemiologist Brooke Nichols, has already caused the deaths of six hundred thousand peopl...
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
One Year After Trumps USAID Shutdown, Sherman & Meeks Lead ...
Jan 23, 2026 Yet, on January 24th, 2025, the Trump Administration abruptly shut down the lifesaving agency with a disastrous stop-work order that cut recipients around the w...
Congressman Brad Sherman | (.gov)
Evaluating the impact of two decades of USAID interventions and ... - The Lancet
Jun 30, 2025 Higher levels of USAID fundingprimarily directed toward LMICs, particularly African countrieswere associated with a 15% reduction in age-standardised all-caus...
The Lancet
What USAID did, and the effects of Trump's cuts on lifesaving aid
Jan 27, 2026 It includes specific directives as to how tax dollars must be used to support vulnerable communities around the world and restore the legacy of U.S. foreign ass...
Oxfam
Death toll from USAID cuts, withdrawal of chikungunya vaccine, funding ... - CIDRAP
Jan 21, 2026 One year after the Trump administration began its dismantling of USAID, a model that tracks the impact of USAID funding cuts on global disease prevention progra...
CIDRAP
USAID defunding could lead to 14 million deaths worldwide from ...
Jul 1, 2025 This indicates that USAID financing prevented 91.8 million all-age deaths, including 30.4 million preschool children, from 2001 to 2021, the authors said. The f...
CIDRAP
A child under five could die every forty seconds by 2030 due to U.S. ...
Jan 15, 2026 Notes to editors * From 2024 to 2025, U.S. humanitarian assistance fell from roughly $14.1 billion USD to $6.4 billion USD. (Carnegie Endowment for Peace). * Ab...
Oxfam
One year on from dismantling of USAID, study projects that global aid cuts could ...
Feb 4, 2026 Now, a new study published in The Lancet medical journal aims to quantify the human toll of those budget decisions projecting that global aid cuts could lead ...
CNN
Trump Somehow Still Spending Billions to Shut Down USAID
May 7, 2026 It could also lead to 22.9 million children under 5 losing critical nutrition, and 5.7 million women losing safe places for childbirth, according to a CNN sourc...
The New Republic
USAID Shuttered A Year Ago. Will Trumps Trade Over Aid ... - Forbes
May 10, 2026 Projections On The Health Impacts of Closing USAID. The projection is that the funding cuts could lead to more than 14 million additional deaths by 2020, includ...
Forbes
6:55
Trump DOGE cuts caused 600000 deaths this year, fmr. USAID official says
YouTubeMS NOW
including its ripple effects on a program known for saving 25 million lives.
Apr 23, 2026 Newsroom | UCLA +4 Key findings regarding the impact of these cuts include: Death Toll Estimates: Independent modeling (ImpactCounter) and studies (published in...
FacebookDevex
USAID cuts may lead to more than 14 million deaths globally, ...
Jul 2, 2025 USAID cuts may lead to more than 14 million deaths globally, including 4.5 million children under 5 by 2030, researchers say * Projections by the researchers sh...
Newsroom | UCLA
0:21The Trump administration claimed its elimination of USAID and humanitarian. [/QUOTE]Naturally, when the next Dem takes office and is saddled with cleaning up this and other colossal Repub messes of everything, the Iran War, massive business and farm failures, disastrously low if non existent jobs creation, etc, the ongoing momentum and tsunami effect from them will likely see even more deaths into that first recovery year or so, as happened with Trump's Pandemic under Biden, the Niagara Falls of GW Bush's Great Repub Recession jobs destruction and business failures handed to Obama, the Great Coolidge / Hoover Repub Depression handed to FDR and so on. The tsunami of Repub Disaster does not suddenly come to a halt and everything resets to zero at 12 Noon on January 20 at a presidential inauguration. And no Dem is either stupid enough nor thinks their supporters are stupid enough to fall for the claim that this will all be solved and over on Day One.
But try not to be moron suckers for typically pro Repub Mainstream Media when they report those ongoing ripple effects without providing ordinary logical context for them.
-
[QUOTE=Huacho;3065368]'Based on cumulative data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and analyses by The Washington Post and Science Feedback, more COVID-19 deaths occurred in the United States during the Biden administration than the Trump administration. However, this comparison is largely attributed to the pandemic lasting the entire duration of the Biden administration's first three+ years, whereas it was managed by the Trump administration for roughly its final 1012 months (starting from the first deaths in early 2020)'.[/QUOTE]On account of Big Pharma and Operation Warp Speed, when Biden was inaugurated the USA had vaccines that were initially 95% effective in preventing COVID cases. That level of protection decreased, but in 2022 the vaccines were still 80% effective in preventing hospitalization and death. Paxlovid, also highly effective in preventing hospitalization and death if taken early on, was introduced around the start of 2022. And as time progressed, more and more people acquired immunity from infection and vaccination.
The Trump administration deserves praise for its part in bringing the COVID vaccines to market in record time. Fauci agrees with me. That said, way too much credit and blame were given to Trump and Biden and their administrations for how we delt with COVID. They did some things right and some things wrong. And what was right or wrong was highly subjective, for example school closures. Tooms would probably argue that was right and Elvis that it was wrong.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065531]On account of Big Pharma and Operation Warp Speed, when Biden was inaugurated the USA had vaccines that were initially 95% effective in preventing COVID cases. That level of protection decreased, but in 2022 the vaccines were still 80% effective in preventing hospitalization and death. Paxlovid, also highly effective in preventing hospitalization and death if taken early on, was introduced around the start of 2022. And as time progressed, more and more people acquired immunity from infection and vaccination.
Way too much credit and blame were given to Trump and Biden and their administrations for how we delt with COVID. They did some things right and some things wrong. And what was right or wrong was highly subjective, for example school closures. Tooms would probably argue that was right and Elvis that it was wrong.[/QUOTE]I more or less agree with your assessment about too much credit and blame, which is true in general for presidents on most subjects. I certainly think schools needed to be closed, although the repercussions will last a long time. The interesting thing for me with COVID was living in a country where the president was a medical doctor and seeing how he handled it. Maybe the best thing he did was put the military to work building I think it was four COVID-only hospitals. He also instituted a 'color code' system where the restrictions had three levels based on the particular level of cases in each region. I think that was varied every week IIRC. One weird thing was allowing barber shops and beauty parlors to be deemed 'essential'; I didn't agree with that. But he did a better job than Dump.
-
2 photos
Uh
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065527]Vance, much more so than anyone else in the Trump administration, did his best to keep this war from happening.
Here are the number of American servicemen who died in various wars:
Democrat Woodrow Wilson's War: 116,516.
Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt's War: 405,399.
Democrat Harry Truman's War: 36,574.
Democrat Lyndon Baines Johnson's War: 58,209.
Republican George H. W. Bush's War: 382.
Republican George W. Bush's Wars: 6,821.
[B]Donald J. Trump's War: 13[/B]
Bloodthirsty Democrats!
Before you came back with Lincoln being Republican, which I thought was odd considering most in your party say 19th century Republicans would be Democrats today. Well, I'll accept that, that Lincoln's relevant. But only if you agree that Trump's a Democrat, as evidenced by his party registration in 2001 to 2009 and his enthusiasm expressed then for a wealth tax and partial birth abortion..[/QUOTE]So WWII was FDR's War, was it? Ever hear of December 7, 1941 and Germany's declaration of War against America two weeks later? Japan and Germany were this year's USA according to Trump.
And the Repub icon of icon Donald Trump has multiple times and with total confirmation by his vast Repub Party staff and supporters accurately cited America's military involvement in Eisenhower's Vietnam War to have lasted "19 years". That more accurately puts it at beginning in 1955, as is also generally accepted as the beginning of America's involvement in it committed fully by word, deed and treaty.
The A. I. Overview:
[QUOTE]The Vietnam War began on November 1, 1955, and lasted until the fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975. [B]This start date marks when the U.S. Military Assistance Advisory Group (MAAG) was deployed to train South Vietnamese forces, acting as the beginning of U.S. involvement.[/b] [/QUOTE]And WWI?
[QUOTE]The United States remained neutral in World War I for nearly three years due to a strong tradition of isolationism, a desire to avoid entangling European alliances, a diverse population with split loyalties, and a focus on domestic affairs. President Wilson aimed for neutrality, but economic ties to the Allies and [b]Germany's unrestricted submarine warfare ultimately forced entry in April 1917. [/b]
[/QUOTE]There was no 1917 version of the fully confirmed, twice by Trump himself, Iran Nuclear Deal to monitor, restrict and control Germany's submarine warfare across the oceans threatening everyone. But if there had been and Trump was president at the time you could count on him to tear it up as the proactive reason America joined the War if not started it entirely. However, since that wasn't the case, WWI was hardly "Wilson's War" as it would have been Trump's War in that hypothetical.
And, darn it all, it seems your Magic MAGA Time Machine always conks out right before an important event or two that would add immeasurably to destroying whatever point you're trying to make, this time about American wars starting under American presidents regardless of the honorable intentions of our involvement:
So you missed this one. And it was a biggie;.
Republican Abraham Lincoln's American Civil War: 620,000 to 750,000 American deaths.
You know, there were still hail and hearty Americans who fought in Republican Abraham Lincoln's American Civil War still alive and kicking in 1917. So it is puzzling how your Magic MAGA Time Machine could possibly have missed it!
-
3 photos
Nope
Tiny12:
[QUOTE]Before you came back with Lincoln being Republican, which I thought was odd considering most in your party say 19th century Republicans would be Democrats today. Well, I'll accept that, that Lincoln's relevant. But only if you agree that Trump's a Democrat, as evidenced by his party registration in 2001 to 2009 and his enthusiasm expressed then for a wealth tax and partial birth abortion.[/QUOTE]Lincoln was a Republican president. So was every Republican president since then. No Dem is claiming Harding was a "Dem". Or Coolidge. Or Hoover.
Trump is a Republican president through and through.
The only significant switch between Repubs and Dems in the mid-1960's was on social issues, not on economic or national security issues. Then again, by the mid-1960's and certainly right up to today, Repubs have had no argument in favor of voting for them on their abysmal economic or national security records. So they had to apply their "Southern Strategy" in order to win votes from dumb hillbillies on racial division issues, where trannies pee, fear that the Dems are going to cut off your son's penis, your daughter's budding breasts and turn everyone into black drag queens that will steal your job, rape your women and eat your cats and dogs.
You and your Magic MAGA Time Machine dishonored American War dead by not citing the estimated 620,000 to 750,000 Americans who died in Republican Abraham Lincoln's War.
More fun with MAGA Timelines and MAGA Math:
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3065511]Your post suggests that you are not American. Hate America and support terrorist regimes. Fortunately USA has a president to bring safety to the world.[/QUOTE]I'm not American and now boycott USA of Trump which make messe and war, no peace, in our world. Blind and not clever Americans, what are most of them, have to understand they are only less than 5% of population and never kings of our world. I support Greenland, our brothers Canadians, UK, Germany which is different than nazis if you are not ignorant, versus Trump craziness. Like I support so courageous Ukrainians versus criminal Putin, even I love Russia, but hate Putin like Trump. I don t care about Muslim religion, but I don t support Islamism which is built on ignorance, same than Trump works in USA with citizens low level and ignorance. Unbelievable, women, black and latina could vote for him, really no neurons, when he hates them. When he is involved in criminal Epstein affair. I same boycott China, not buying their products: phones, cars.
-
The too old, senile orange feeling asleep once again in a public meeting. Funny, USA thinking they are kings of the world, but led by a crazy marmot. Where is MAGA? Not with Trump for sure.
-
Trump defeating Iran terror
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3065561]I'm not American and now boycott USA of Trump which make messe and war, no peace, in our world. Blind and not clever Americans, what are most of them, have to understand they are only less than 5% of population and never kings of our world. I support Greenland, our brothers Canadians, UK, Germany which is different than nazis if you are not ignorant, versus Trump craziness. Like I support so courageous Ukrainians versus criminal Putin, even I love Russia, but hate Putin like Trump. I don t care about Muslim religion, but I don t support Islamism which is built on ignorance, same than Trump works in USA with citizens low level and ignorance. Unbelievable, women, black and latina could vote for him, really no neurons, when he hates them. When he is involved in criminal Epstein affair. I same boycott China, not buying their products: phones, cars.[/QUOTE]Well I suppose then if Trump defeats Iran and eliminates a great amount of the terrorism sponsored by Iran you could change your mind. The fact that you keep bring up Epstein files when there is no wrongdoing by Trump shows you are just anti Trump. Your boycott of USA will not worry anyone. Trump has stopped 7 wars in 16 months. He will stop Ukraine war and Iran war both this year. He will achieve what no other president or leader has done. You can still hate Trump regardless if he saves the world. I don't particularly lie Trump as a person but his policies work for Americans. That is the bottom line.
-
Facts are that Trump stopped 7 wars in the World
[QUOTE=EihToomsfactsareTrump;3065517]Of all your Joke Posts, this one might be your funniest one.
You do know the President before Trump pulled us out of the quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice in Iraq, right? Yeah, his name was Barack Obama.
And you do know the President after Trump pulled us out of the quagmire, counterproductive War of Choice in Afghanistan, right? Yeah, his name was Joe Biden.
And you further know the president between Barack Obama and Joe Biden happily presided over the quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice in Afghanistan over the entirety of his so-called presidency, every day, hour and minute of it and all while he was telling dumb Repub hillbillies that he could stop any war anywhere in 24 hours with a phonecall, right? Yeah, his name was Donald Trump.
FUN FACT: Have you noticed that when Trump lists the previous America-involved wars that lasted longer than his current quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice in Iran has lasted so far, "the Vietnam War, 19 years, WWII, five years" and so on, that he never mentions the longest one of all, the Afghanistan War? LOL. Now you know why. Because he didn't / couldn't handle the most difficult part of that quagmire, counterproductive Repub War of Choice that the two Presidents on either side of his disastrous so-called presidency handled better than any withdrawal from an occupied country by the losing side in the history of modern warfare; getting America the fuck out of it..[/QUOTE]Facts are Trump stopped 7 wars in the world in his first year. Facts are Obama and Biden poured billions of dollars to Iran which funded the terrorists worldwide and enabled Iran to develop nuclear. It isn't a joke to the countries he stopped the wars for. Only joke on this site seems to be you.
-
3 photos
Certainly not by his definition of War
[QUOTE=Canada;3065660]Facts are Trump stopped 7 wars in the world in his first year. Facts are Obama and Biden poured billions of dollars to Iran which funded the terrorists worldwide and enabled Iran to develop nuclear. It isn't a joke to the countries he stopped the wars for. Only joke on this site seems to be you.[/QUOTE]According to Trump, what he decided to do with Iran even though there was no USA national security need to do it is "a little love tap", a "journey", an "excursion" and not a War.
So whatever those 7-8 skirmishes at most were that nobody ever heard of outside of a few people shooting off guns in some direction somewhere, they certainly could not have been anything like a wars by his own understanding of the term.
Netanyahu stopped bombing Gaza because he ran out of places to bomb there. Nothing to do with Trump. Biden had already negotiated and achieved two ceasefires and got 120+ hostages released. He negotiated the latest ceasefire in May 2024 too but Netanyahu knew if he delayed honoring that one until after the November 2024 election he might piss off enough angry Muslims against the Biden Administration in the only three swing states that mattered, PA, MI and WI, to swing some of that Community's usual Dem candidate votes to the Repub candidate, which 0.75 of a single percentage point of them did, and thereby be solely responsible for putting Trump over the Electoral College threshold to win the election.
And that is exactly what happened.
Consequently, Netanyahu's decision to delay that recent ceasefire until after the November 2024 election, which got the final 25 or so hostages released, also bought him a POTUS dumb enough to launch America into his long wished for quagmire, counterproductive Repub War in Iran.
Could you even name two of the "wars" Trump supposedly stopped without rushing to Google to find out? We know he couldn't stop a Real War, the USA War in Afghanistan, for the entirety of his first 4 long and miserable years as so-called Commander-in-Chief and so-called president of the United States of America. Oh, and we know the "war" he is most proud of having stopped was the war between "Aberbizian" and Albania because he has mentioned that one several times.
[B]Trump, 79, Forgets Name of War He Supposedly Solved.[/B]
[URL]https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-79-forgets-name-war-093136839.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]President Donald Trump forgot the name of a country involved in a war he takes credit for resolving during a speech in South Korea.
The 79-year-old president struggled to pronounce Azerbaijan when discussing a peace deal he helped broker, and then didnt bother naming the second country involved, Armenia.
Trump, who is on course to be the oldest president in U.S. history, has repeatedly made gaffes while boasting about conflicts he claims to have ended in his second term. This includes frequently saying he ended a war between Azerbaijan and Albania, when he actually means the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia.
...........
"We saved millions and millions of lives with all of them. Azerbaijan. If you look at, if you look at, errr Trump told the crowd of CEOs while failing to recall Armenia. Just take a look at that one, he added after giving up.[/QUOTE]Is that your favorite one too?
-
[QUOTE=Huacho;3065535]I more or less agree with your assessment about too much credit and blame, which is true in general for presidents on most subjects. I certainly think schools needed to be closed, although the repercussions will last a long time. The interesting thing for me with COVID was living in a country where the president was a medical doctor and seeing how he handled it. Maybe the best thing he did was put the military to work building I think it was four COVID-only hospitals. He also instituted a 'color code' system where the restrictions had three levels based on the particular level of cases in each region. I think that was varied every week IIRC. One weird thing was allowing barber shops and beauty parlors to be deemed 'essential'; I didn't agree with that. But he did a better job than Dump.[/QUOTE]You live in Guatemala? The hospitals overflowed in my community, as did the morgues. They had to bring in refrigerated trailers from Fort Worth to hold all the dead bodies. It would have been great if Trump and Biden had put the military to work doing something useful, to alleviate situations like what we had, like your president did. Kind of related, Hegseth's asking for a 1. 5 trillion military budget, up 50% from last year! WTF! That extra money's not going to be put to good use, like the military budget in Guatemala was.
I disagree about the barber shops. I strapped on my KN-95 mask when I went to get my haircut, and my hairstylist had her rinky dink mask too. I felt invincible, especially after I got the vaccines. And I disagree about the schools too. They should have made those little snot nosed bastards wear N-95 masks, the right way, and beaten the hell out of them if they didn't. If China can have its 6th graders doing differential calculus, then by damn we should be able to get our kids to wear masks.
I more or less agreed with you back until at least the fall of 2020. Since then I've come to believe there were two ways to get through COVID that half assed worked. One was like China and Australia, quarantine people and severely restrict freedom of movement. Here in God's country, rural and suburban Texas, people weren't going to put up with that though. So then you default to the second way, the Swedish model. You use common sense, try to protect your old people, and get on with life.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3065529]Add these expert estimates of hundreds of thousands of deaths currently and millions and millions more deaths in the future to the millions of Trump's Mass Murder victim deaths he racked up already after one of his previous "defunding frenzy" efforts led directly to creating Trump's Pandemic.
See, unless Trump defunds these programs that have kept Americans and other people around the world alive, healthier and safer, where will his Trillions of Dollars in corporate welfare and more tax cuts for himself, his Crime Family and other billionaires come from?
The A. I. Overview:
Naturally, when the next Dem takes office and is saddled with cleaning up this and other colossal Repub messes of everything, the Iran War, massive business and farm failures, disastrously low if non existent jobs creation, etc, the ongoing momentum and tsunami effect from them will likely see even more deaths into that first recovery year or so, as happened with Trump's Pandemic under Biden, the Niagara Falls of GW Bush's Great Repub Recession jobs destruction and business failures handed to Obama, the Great Coolidge / Hoover Repub Depression handed to FDR and so on. The tsunami of Repub Disaster does not suddenly come to a halt and everything resets to zero at 12 Noon on January 20 at a presidential inauguration. And no Dem is either stupid enough nor thinks their supporters are stupid enough to fall for the claim that this will all be solved and over on Day One.
But try not to be moron suckers for typically pro Repub Mainstream Media when they report those ongoing ripple effects without providing ordinary logical context for them.[/QUOTE]Damn it Tooms, you're like the little boy who cried wolf. You come up with something I agree with, that the sudden and extreme cuts to USAID were a travesty, and I almost miss it, because you're compelled to mix that in with lots of anti-Republican hate speech. I think, "That's just another Tooms Republican Snuff Porn Post," and almost don't bother to read it.
-
Lol
[QUOTE=Canada;3065658]Well I suppose then if Trump defeats Iran and eliminates a great amount of the terrorism sponsored by Iran you could change your mind. The fact that you keep bring up Epstein files when there is no wrongdoing by Trump shows you are just anti Trump. Your boycott of USA will not worry anyone. Trump has stopped 7 wars in 16 months. He will stop Ukraine war and Iran war both this year. He will achieve what no other president or leader has done. You can still hate Trump regardless if he saves the world. I don't particularly lie Trump as a person but his policies work for Americans. That is the bottom line.[/QUOTE]Are you from Canada? Because, Trump did not serve in Vietnam; he's a draft dodger. He hasn't prevented any wars. He's very unstable and needs rest time. He's saying Venezuela will be the 51st state. How nutty is that? Did he not say he was going to buy Canada and referred to the Prime Minister as Governor.
I admired how Prime Minister Carney handled Trump at the White House when he told that he was sure that White House was not for sale so they same would be true for the nation of Canada. The New York Times has reported today that most of Iran's military equipment near the Strait Of Hormuz is still intact.
It's nonsensical to believe that airstrikes alone can topple Iran. We need to have a program for Trump supporters and sycophants to be sent to front lines for any combat missions. Let's see how your fly-by-your- ass instincts work for you in real combat.
-
3 photos
Since when?
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065690]Damn it Tooms, you're like the little boy who cried wolf. You come up with something I agree with, that the sudden and extreme cuts to USAID were a travesty, and I almost miss it, because you're compelled to mix that in with lots of anti-Republican hate speech. I think, "That's just another Tooms Republican Snuff Porn Post," and almost don't bother to read it.[/QUOTE]Citing the numbers of Americans and other people around the World that Repub Trump has Mass Murdered so far with his frenzied typical Repub defunding and removal of programs designed specifically to prevent Mass Murders and save lives, contrary to all expert warnings for him and other Repubs not to do something so dangerous and stupid, hardly constitutes "anti-Republican hate speech. " It should be so common-place to state these simple truths that even typically pro Repub Mainstream Media can not ignore them and must report them, no matter how grudgingly.
Oh look! Another Repub Trump's Liquor Cabinet member is working hard to create the next deadly, worldwide economy-destroying and hyper inflation-triggering Repub Pandemic:
[B]Experts worry 'we are not prepared' for pandemic under Trump, RFK Jr.[/B]
[URL]https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2026/05/08/trump-rfk-jr-prepared-potential-pandemics/89991254007/[/URL]
[QUOTE]The A.I. Overview:
The real questions we should be asking about hantavirus and another pandemic
Experts warn that the United States is ill‑prepared for a potential pandemic as a hantavirus outbreak draws attention, criticizing recent funding cuts, the withdrawal from the WHO and changes to vaccine policy under the Trump administration and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., while WHO officials stress the virus is not a pandemic threat.
..........
Infectious Diseases Society of America CEO Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo said the U.S. is not prepared for public‑health crises, citing large‑scale funding and workforce cuts to the CDC, withdrawal from the WHO, decimation of USAID and cuts to scientific research.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ended long‑standing childhood vaccine recommendations, which experts say undermines public trust in health institutions..[/QUOTE]Yeah, yeah, we already know what the MAGA response will be; "Hey, nobody could have predicted such a thing! It's just another wild coincidence! This new deadly, worldwide economy-destroying, hyper inflation-triggering Pandemic would have happened under any president including a Dem president"!
Uh. Nope.
And typically pro Repub Mainstream Media's predictable response? "Well, that Pandemic wasn't Trump's fault. He should remind everyone what a great economy he produced before that Pandemic came out of nowhere and ruined it"!
You know, the "great" Repub Trump economy today of crap jobs creation numbers vs historically positive private-sector jobs numbers under Biden, lower GDP Growth numbers than he inherited from Biden, a higher unemployment rate than he inherited under Biden, higher grocery prices than he inherited under Biden, a higher inflation rate than he inherited under Biden, an inflation rate now exceeding the weakest wage growth in 5 years, and all with Trillions of Dollars added to his deficits with exactly zero to show for it.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3065658]Well I suppose then if Trump defeats Iran and eliminates a great amount of the terrorism sponsored by Iran you could change your mind. The fact that you keep bring up Epstein files when there is no wrongdoing by Trump shows you are just anti Trump. Your boycott of USA will not worry anyone. Trump has stopped 7 wars in 16 months. He will stop Ukraine war and Iran war both this year. He will achieve what no other president or leader has done. You can still hate Trump regardless if he saves the world. I don't particularly lie Trump as a person but his policies work for Americans. That is the bottom line.[/QUOTE]Real facts are Trump is a sexual criminal. If he was not protected, he should be in jail where was Epstein, same than Netanyahou for other reason. Which 7 wars stopped your crazy senile sleeper, when he attacked Venezuela, Iran, threaten Greenland, Mexico, Canada, Germany. I don't see other than a danger for our world, who wants to rob Ukraine, Greenland, just making shame on no MAGA USA. Yes, mollahs are dangerous, but for Iranians, not USA nor my France, and your daily bullshiting Trump didn't change anything, still same mollahs and uranium, but economics now partly blocked and inflation, some Americans died and not finish now because of Trump. Now Islamists, not only from Iran, will target Americans, because of Trump and his ignorance. He lost, when he didn't know where he put hand, when he is just ignorant stupid and same for his team. Obama and Biden were much clever than him, don't make war with people who are proud to become martyr and die. US marines are not able for this ideology, they are scared to die.
-
[QUOTE=Tiny12;3065690] I think, "That's just another Tooms Republican Snuff Porn Post," and ALMOST don't bother to read it.[/QUOTE]"Almost" 555!
-
Carney is a joke
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3065692]Are you from Canada? Because, Trump did not serve in Vietnam; he's a draft dodger. He hasn't prevented any wars. He's very unstable and needs rest time. He's saying Venezuela will be the 51st state. How nutty is that? Did he not say he was going to buy Canada and referred to the Prime Minister as Governor.
I admired how Prime Minister Carney handled Trump at the White House when he told that he was sure that White House was not for sale so they same would be true for the nation of Canada. The New York Times has reported today that most of Iran's military equipment near the Strait Of Hormuz is still intact.
It's nonsensical to believe that airstrikes alone can topple Iran. We need to have a program for Trump supporters and sycophants to be sent to front lines for any combat missions. Let's see how your fly-by-your- ass instincts work for you in real combat.[/QUOTE]Yes I am Canadian. Socialism is out of control here. Health care system is a joke. Taxes are ridiculous. Gas prices are $8 CDN a gallon and we have more oil than USA. Carney is a joke. He has handled the trade issue with USA terribly and may possibly ruin the Canadian economy. Canada has tariffs on everything coming into Canada from all countries and even charges tariffs between our provinces. He was elected because he was going to be tough with Trump. It was like Peewee Herman saying he was going to be tough with Hulk Hogan. Wasn't a fair fight. Still has time to be dumber than Trudeau. Canada inflation s equivalent to Biden inflation. Unfortunately Canada does not have a Trump as Prime Minister. Trump economy is best in the world right now. Canada economy one of the worse. Thank god USA didn't get Harris as president. Thank your lucky stars.
-
Iran war
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3065685]According to Trump, what he decided to do with Iran even though there was no USA national security need to do it is "a little love tap", a "journey", an "excursion" and not a War.
So whatever those 7-8 skirmishes at most were that nobody ever heard of outside of a few people shooting off guns in some direction somewhere, they certainly could not have been anything like a wars by his own understanding of the term.
Netanyahu stopped bombing Gaza because he ran out of places to bomb there. Nothing to do with Trump. Biden had already negotiated and achieved two ceasefires and got 120+ hostages released. He negotiated the latest ceasefire in May 2024 too but Netanyahu knew if he delayed honoring that one until after the November 2024 election he might piss off enough angry Muslims against the Biden Administration in the only three swing states that mattered, PA, MI and WI, to swing some of that Community's usual Dem candidate votes to the Repub candidate, which 0.75 of a single percentage point of them did, and thereby be solely responsible for putting Trump over the Electoral College threshold to win the election.[/QUOTE]If you can't acknowledge that Iran terror over the USA and other countries over the past 40 years happened then you must be a huge supporter of Iran and all the worldwide terrorists. I just don't feel a terrorist supporter should be taken serious on this site with their anti American posts. You must have been in your glory when Biden and Obama sent billions of dollars to Iran over their presidency to start the Israel war ad terrorist attacks. Really shows who you are.
-
Accusations
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3065715]Real facts are Trump is a sexual criminal. If he was not protected, he should be in jail where was Epstein, same than Netanyahou for other reason. Which 7 wars stopped your crazy senile sleeper, when he attacked Venezuela, Iran, threaten Greenland, Mexico, Canada, Germany. I don't see other than a danger for our world, who wants to rob Ukraine, Greenland, just making shame on no MAGA USA. Yes, mollahs are dangerous, but for Iranians, not USA nor my France, and your daily bullshiting Trump didn't change anything, still same mollahs and uranium, but economics now partly blocked and inflation, some Americans died and not finish now because of Trump. Now Islamists, not only from Iran, will target Americans, because of Trump and his ignorance. He lost, when he didn't know where he put hand, when he is just ignorant stupid and same for his team. Obama and Biden were much clever than him, don't make war with people who are proud to become martyr and die. US marines are not able for this ideology, they are scared to die.[/QUOTE]You accuse Trump as a sexual criminal. Ok send me the proof. If you don't have any proof you shouldn't be lying about this. I guess if you assume that you can just post these lies with out proof ten we can post everyday that you are a sexual criminal. You are as much of a sexual criminal as Trump and I have the same proof you have.
-
3 photos
This is what links on this topic look like:
[QUOTE=Canada;3065788]If you can't acknowledge that Iran terror over the USA and other countries over the past 40 years happened then you must be a huge supporter of Iran and all the worldwide terrorists. I just don't feel a terrorist supporter should be taken serious on this site with their anti American posts. You must have been in your glory when Biden and Obama sent billions of dollars to Iran over their presidency to start the Israel war ad terrorist attacks. Really shows who you are.[/QUOTE][B]Trump on Irans Multiple Violations[/B]
[URL]https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/trump-irans-multiple-violations/[/URL]
[QUOTE]In refusing to certify the Iran nuclear deal, President Donald Trump said Iran has committed multiple violations of the agreement. But thats not the finding of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
The IAEA has issued eight reports since the agreement was implemented in January 2016, and all eight have found Iran is implementing the agreement most recently on Aug. 31.
[B]Trump himself has certified to Congress on two occasions that Iran has complied with the nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA. [/b]The president must issue a certification every 90 days.[/QUOTE][B]Pentagon tells Congress no sign that Iran was going to attack US first, sources say.
March 2, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/us/pentagon-tells-congress-no-sign-that-iran-was-going-attack-us-first-sources-say-2026-03-02/[/URL]
[B]Pentagon tells Congress no intelligence showed Iran was preparing to strike before US attack
Closed-door briefings acknowledge no evidence that Tehran intended to hit US forces first, as Democrats accuse Trump of launching a war of choice.[/B]
[URL]https://www.trtworld.com/article/50386a301b64[/URL]
The A. I. Overview:
[QUOTE][b]Trump's stated justification for his Iran War[/b]
+6
Based on reports from early 2026, President Trump justified the war with Iran by asserting the need to eliminate "imminent threats" to U.S. forces, allies, and to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Trump claimed the strikes were proactive measures to destroy Iran's ballistic missile program, navy, and military capabilities to achieve peace in the region.
BBC
+2
Key justifications and stated objectives included:
Imminent Threats: Trump argued Iran was planning attacks, stating, "If we didn't do it, they (Iran) were going to attack first".
Nuclear Prevention: A primary goal was to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, with This article from Time noting Trump's focus on dismantling nuclear facilities following joint U.S.-Israel strikes.
Military Destruction: Trump stated the goal was to "destroy Iran's Navy" and "missiles capable of reaching our beautiful America".
Regime Change/Support for Protesters: Trump encouraged Iranian protesters to take control of their government, claiming the U.S. was providing "overwhelming strength and devastating force" to aid their freedom.
Preemptive Strike: Officials noted the action was taken to preempt Iranian attacks, with This YouTube video indicating the administration claimed Iran had been "killing Americans" for decades.
Reuters
+5
The administrations messaging, as reported by NPR, often claimed Iran's military was "decimated," while some reports noted a goal of fostering regional stability by weakening Iran's influence.
NPR
+1
How Trump's stated reasons, goals and timeline for Iran war have shifted - Reuters
But whatever the time is, it's okay. Whatever it takes," Trump said at the White House. In a social media post, Trump said there was a "virtually unlimited supp...
Reuters
Six key lines from Trump's statement on Iran strikes - BBC
Feb 28, 2569 BE "Our objective is to defend the American people by eliminating imminent threats from the Iranian regime, a vicious group of very hard, terrible people. Its mena...
BBC
5:26
How Trump is trying to justify the Iran war
YouTubeCBS News
What the Trump administration says about why it went to war with Iran
Mar 7, 2026 BE "Missiles capable of reaching our beautiful America" ... One of the more consistent rationales the White House has given for launching strikes is that Iran was ...
NPR
How Trumps Iran war objectives have shifted over time - NPR
Mar 25, 2026 BE Peace. When he launched the war, Trump emphasized that the bombing would continue uninterrupted "as long as necessary to achieve our objective of PEACE THROUGHO...
NPR
Read Trump's full statement on Iran attacks | PBS News
Feb 28, 2569 BE To the members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, the armed forces and all of the police, I say tonight that you must lay down your weapons and have complete i...
PBS
Rationale for the 2026 Iran war - Wikipedia
President Donald Trump has stated the goals of the war were to destroy Iran's ballistic missiles, eliminate their navy, prevent them from acquiring nuclear weap...
Wikipedia
Trump Says Cease-Fire With Iran on 'Life Support' After Rejecting Tehrans Response
May 12, 2569 BE U.S. and Israel's core focus: Iran's nuclear capabilities. The dispute over Iran's nuclear capabilities lies at the center of the current impasse in Washington ...
Time Magazine
50s
Why is Trump claiming the U.S. won the war with Iran?[/QUOTE]Nope. There is no official statement about Iran "sponsoring terror" other than the non specific claim that Iran has been killing Americans for years. But not nearly as many as Trump's decisions in 2019 and 2020 did, of course.
Obama and Biden returned Iran's own money to them because, as Trump himself confirmed twice, they were behaving properly, like good boys and girls, and in complete compliance with the highly effective Iran Nuclear Deal that Trump tore up and, say it with me, "defunded and removed" the inspectors right after he confirmed they were in compliance, thereby allowing Iran to do anything it damn well pleased over the past 9 years.
That move by Trump has proven to be a lot more expensive in lives and American dollars than all the Billions returned to Iran by all the presidents before Trump.
[QUOTE][b]Factcheck: Obama and Biden sent billions to Iran?[/b]
+7
Yes, the Obama and Biden administrations released billions of dollars in Iranian funds that were previously frozen by U.S. sanctions, totaling an estimated $17.6 billion. These were not taxpayer-funded gifts but Iranian assets released as part of settlements or hostage deals.
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
+3
Key Facts on Fund Releases:
Obama Administration ($1.7 Billion): In 2016, the Obama administration paid $1.7 billion in cash (comprising $400 million in principal and $1.3 billion in interest) to settle a failed pre-1979 arms deal. The payment coincided with the release of American prisoners, leading to accusations of a "ransom" payment.
Biden Administration ($16 Billion): The Biden administration made about $16 billion in previously frozen funds accessible to Iran. This included $10 billion in Iraqi electricity payments and $6 billion in a hostage deal aimed at humanitarian transactions.
YouTube
PBS NewsHour
+3
Key Context:
Nature of Funds: The funds were Iranian assets held in foreign banks or in the U.S. that were frozen due to sanctions.
Purpose: The releases were linked to complex negotiations, including the 2015 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) and prisoner swaps.
Controversy: Critics, primarily Republican lawmakers, argue these funds strengthened Iran, a state sponsor of terrorism, while the administrations maintained the payments were lawful settlements.
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
+5
Iran Nuclear Deal: Correcting Misconceptions
The Facts: The money that Iran receives from complying with the agreement is not a direct payment from the U.S. government. Instead, the funds are Iranian forei...
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
Biden Handed Over $16 Billion to Iran - Congressman Brian Mast
Washington loves mincing words. About two months ago, President Biden agreed to hand over $6 BILLION as a part of a hostage deal with Tehran. Shortly after, Ham...
House.gov
Yes, Barack Obama paid Iran $1.7 billion in cash. But here is the full story ...
Yes, both the Obama and Biden administrations [b]released billions of dollars in Iranian funds that had been frozen by U.S. sanctions, but these actions were struc...[/b]
FacebookFirstpost.
Fact check: How much money did Obama and Biden send to Iran? What to know.
In total, the Biden administration made $16 billion accessible to Iran. Thus, combined, the Biden administration and the Obama administration made combined $17.[/QUOTE]See, that was part of the deal in order to get Iran to fully comply with the Nuclear Agreement, which all three presidents since that deal was made confirmed multiple times that they were indeed in compliance with it, rather than, you know, stupidly plunge America into another quagmire, counterproductive War of Choice in the Middle East where the first thing everyine knew Iran would do is shutdown, control the Strait of Hormuz and throw the World into another historic global Repub economic disaster.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3065789]You accuse Trump as a sexual criminal. Ok send me the proof. If you don't have any proof you shouldn't be lying about this. I guess if you assume that you can just post these lies with out proof ten we can post everyday that you are a sexual criminal. You are as much of a sexual criminal as Trump and I have the same proof you have.[/QUOTE]What proof did Trump have when he implied that Barack Obama was not a US citizen? Trump does have a civil verdict of 83 million sexual battery on E jean Carroll. Why do you feel the need to defend Trump against statement that is made about him. He's a grown man and can handle it.
To defend the honor of your woman is one thing but Trump is a dude. LOL.
-
3 photos
MAGAs loves them some Pro China Globalization!
BTW, whatever happened to MDS? As I recall he was certain his no doubt 3rd sucker vote for Trump would be the end of "globalization", that Trump was going to destroy China's growing influence on World Trade and all those other blatantly obvious Trump campaign lies. I hope he chimes in on this latest event to clarify whatever part of that I might have misremembered.
Regardless, there were whole bunches of MAGAs who sucker voted for Trump 3 times in order to get about as opposite the results that Trump has produced so far in 5 1/2 years as so-called president as it could possibly get.
Not only has Trump's 2nd Failed Trade and Tariffs War with China gifted China with the greatest Trade Surplus in its history and continued his first failed Trade and Tariffs War's effect of slamming American farmers and small businesses into near or outright bankruptcy and lost international customers for the survivors to China, but his current trip to China with hat in hand is Pro China Globalization on Steroids!
Where are the representatives of American farmers, small businesses, etc who might also enjoy a morsel or two of charity those Corporate CEOs are hoping to get from Xi?
[B]Chinas record trade surplus reveals its biggest strength and hidden weakness..
Booming Chinese exports have driven trade surplus past $1tn but also reveal the extent of country's reliance on foreign markets.[/B]
[URL]https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/dec/09/chinas-record-high-trade-surplus-reveals-the-difficulty-trump-will-have-in-rebalancing-global-economy[/URL]
No problem, really. Xi could count on limp-dick Trump to rush in with whatever disastrous Repub War Mongering blunders necessary to shore up that momentary Chinese weakness:
[B]China April exports rebound strongly, trade surplus widens ahead of Trump visit.
May 9, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-april-exports-rebound-strongly-trade-surplus-widens-ahead-trump-visit-2026-05-09/[/URL]
[B]Trump kicks off high-stakes summit with Xi.[/B]
[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/14/in-photos-trump-lands-in-beijing-ahead-of-high-stakes-summit-with-xi.html?__source=androidappshare[/URL]
-
Liar Trump
[QUOTE=Canada;3065789]You accuse Trump as a sexual criminal. Ok send me the proof. If you don't have any proof you shouldn't be lying about this. I guess if you assume that you can just post these lies with out proof ten we can post everyday that you are a sexual criminal. You are as much of a sexual criminal as Trump and I have the same proof you have.[/QUOTE]Ask women who were under 18 and not only one, but maybe you will also tell they lie, so proud to tell they were aggressed by such man. He has good lawyers and big money, not to be prosecuted and now protected, but you can look all Epstein files, you won't find me, when you will find him often. Do you know he must suck Putin who has photos of him with prostitutes in Moscow. Except blind and Netanyahou who need him, everybody know how bad is your Trump and putting real shame on USA. You didn't list 7 peaces he made? Not Ukraine, not Venezuela, not Greenland, not Gaza where he wanted to build a beach resort as a shameful crazy he is, not Lebanon, but I can tell you Americans will die because of his craziness, he already killed a mother with his ICE.
-
2 photos
Trump confessed to a kiddie-diddling related crime
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3065842]Ask women who were under 18 and not only one, but maybe you will also tell they lie, so proud to tell they were aggressed by such man. He has good lawyers and big money, not to be prosecuted and now protected, but you can look all Epstein files, you won't find me, when you will find him often. Do you know he must suck Putin who has photos of him with prostitutes in Moscow. Except blind and Netanyahou who need him, everybody know how bad is your Trump and putting real shame on USA. You didn't list 7 peaces he made? Not Ukraine, not Venezuela, not Greenland, not Gaza where he wanted to build a beach resort as a shameful crazy he is, not Lebanon, but I can tell you Americans will die because of his craziness, he already killed a mother with his ICE.[/QUOTE]Trump confessed to Florida police that he / everyone "knew about Epstein's evil acts with underage girls" before he was arrested for it.
[B]Donald Trump Told Police 'Everyone' Knew About Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes in 2006.
Feb. 11, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/donald-trump-told-police-everyone-170932777.html[/URL]
[QUOTE]Donald Trump told cops "everyone" knew about Jeffrey Epstein's evil acts with underage girls ... this according to an official FBI report.
The report -- several of the millions of Epstein document pages released by Trump's Department of Justice in recent weeks -- lays out the Palm Beach Police Department's investigation into the financier during the early 2000s.
............
At one point, Trump apparently called PBPD -- Reiter says this was in 2006, around the time Epstein was arrested and charged with a state-level solicitation of prostitution charge -- and said, "Thank goodness you're stopping him, everyone has known he's been doing this."
[B]He specifically mentions Epstein's association with underage girls ... telling cops "he was around Epstein once when teenagers were present and Trump 'got the hell out of there.'"[/b][/QUOTE]This is what the law says about adults who are "know" about such abuse of underage victims and do not report it to the authorities:
[B]Penalties for Failure to Report and False Reporting of Child Abuse and Neglect: Summary of State Laws.[/B]
[URL]https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/penalties-failure-report-and-false-reporting-child-abuse-and[/URL]
[QUOTE]Many cases of child abuse and neglect are not reported, even when mandated by law. Therefore, nearly every State and United States territory imposes penalties, often in the form of a fine or imprisonment, on mandatory reporters who fail to report suspected child abuse or neglect as required by law, as well as to prevent malicious or intentional reporting of cases that are not founded. Approximately 47 States, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands impose penalties on mandatory reporters who knowingly or willfully fail to make a report when they suspect that a child is being abused or neglected. [B]With failure to report classified as a misdemeanor in 39 States and American Samoa, Guam, and the Virgin Island, in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota, misdemeanors are upgraded to felonies for failure to report more serious situations[/b], while in Illinois and Guam, second or subsequent violations are classified as felonies. Approximately 28 States carry penalties in their civil child protection laws for any person who willfully or intentionally makes a report of child abuse or neglect that the reporter knows to be false. Twenty States and the Virgin Islands classify false reporting as a misdemeanor or similar charge. This report provides a State-by-State and United States territory summary of laws for failure to report and false reporting of child abuse and neglect.[/QUOTE]To the MAGAs who vomit up lies without the slightest effort to provide a shred of substantiation for their lies, knowing full well that none exists, be careful what you wish for when you "demand" substantiation from the rest of us for the facts and truths we post. Not that there is yet proof that Trump did the kiddie-diddling himself here.
But now everyone on this forum knows he knew about it happening all around him and just "got the hell out of there", saying and doing nothing to prevent it from continuing to happen for years. Oh, and everyone also knows that at least one MAGA poster here is apparently just fine and dandy with that.
Mind you, nobody was talking about teenagers merely being "present" around Epstein. There is no law forbidding that. Trump was clearly talking about the behavior that gets someone arrested and convicted of a serious crime.
The A. I. Overview:
[QUOTE]+4
Yes, Jeffrey Epstein's initial 2008 Florida plea deal stemmed from a 2005 investigation into accusations that he solicited prostitutes, [b]including minors under the age of 18, at his Palm Beach mansion. While the charges were for soliciting prostitution, the investigation involved at least 36 young girls, some as young as 14. [/b]
PBS
+2[/QUOTE]
-
Trump Reportedly Epstein in 2006
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3065892]Trump confessed to Florida police that he / everyone "knew about Epstein's evil acts with underage girls" before he was arrested for it.
[B]Donald Trump Told Police 'Everyone' Knew About Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes in 2006.
Feb. 11, 2026[/B]
[URL]https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/donald-trump-told-police-everyone-170932777.html[/URL]
This is what the law says about adults who are "know" about such abuse of underage victims and do not report it to the authorities:
[B]Penalties for Failure to Report and False Reporting of Child Abuse and Neglect: Summary of State Laws.[/B]
[URL]https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/penalties-failure-report-and-false-reporting-child-abuse-and[/URL]
To the MAGAs who vomit up lies without the slightest effort to provide a shred of substantiation for their lies, knowing full well that none exists, be careful what you wish for when you "demand" substantiation from the rest of us for the facts and truths we post. Not that there is yet proof that Trump did the kiddie-diddling himself here.[/QUOTE]Yes you are correct. Trump reportedly Epstein in 2006 to the sheriff in Florida. He kicked Epstein out of his club when he found this out and reported it. Yes you are correct not one of Epstein Democrat friends reported him. Only Trump reported him to authorities. Bill Clinton or Hillary did not report him. Yes a Republican was the only one to report Epstein to the authorities. Thank you for confining this.
-
Please provide me the name of any of the underage girls
[QUOTE=Sirioja;3065842]Ask women who were under 18 and not only one, but maybe you will also tell they lie, so proud to tell they were aggressed by such man. He has good lawyers and big money, not to be prosecuted and now protected, but you can look all Epstein files, you won't find me, when you will find him often. Do you know he must suck Putin who has photos of him with prostitutes in Moscow. Except blind and Netanyahou who need him, everybody know how bad is your Trump and putting real shame on USA. You didn't list 7 peaces he made? Not Ukraine, not Venezuela, not Greenland, not Gaza where he wanted to build a beach resort as a shameful crazy he is, not Lebanon, but I can tell you Americans will die because of his craziness, he already killed a mother with his ICE.[/QUOTE]Please provide me with the name of one of the underage girls. You can't because there aren't any. So quit your lies. It is embarrassing.
-
Proof
[QUOTE=KeviKev68;3065835]What proof did Trump have when he implied that Barack Obama was not a US citizen? Trump does have a civil verdict of 83 million sexual battery on E jean Carroll. Why do you feel the need to defend Trump against statement that is made about him. He's a grown man and can handle it.
To defend the honor of your woman is one thing but Trump is a dude. LOL.[/QUOTE]Trump didn't have proof that Obama wasn't a citizen. That is why he demanded Obama provide his birth certificate. And Obama refused for years to show proof. Once Obama showed a birth certificate (real or fake) Trump stopped. That is why you should stop your lies unless you have proof of what you are posting.
-
MAGA Fuhrer, awards himself $10 bn dollars, in biggest shakedown in US history
As if high gas prices, high grocery prices, high energy prices and high bankruptcies among farmers, small businesses, truckers and millions of Americans wasn't enough, in the midst of yet another self-inflected dumbass Repub middle-east fossil fuel war, the MAGA Fuhrer looks to enrich himself and award himself $10 billion dollars in taxpayers money.
[B]DOJ Plots Giant Payout for Trump in His $10B Taxpayer Shakedown,[/B] May 13 2026, [URL]https://www.thedailybeast.com/doj-plots-giant-payout-for-donald-trump-in-his-10b-irs-lawsuit-taxpayer-shakedown/[/URL].
This is the corrupt and criminal Repub gov't, MAGA suckers, twice voted for, as taxpayers get pick-pocketed, bleed to death and grifted, by their MAGA Fuhrer and billionaire buddies.
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3065935]Please provide me with the name of one of the underage girls. You can't because there aren't any. So quit your lies. It is embarrassing.[/QUOTE]You can be as blind supporter of Trump as you feel good with it, but there are women and not only one, but with his look and manners, quite normal he needs to force. If he was not protected, he would probably be in front of justice for many reasons. I wish mid terms will get rid of him, for benefit of women and our world, when he is just a shame and put shame on USA.
-
1 photos
Nope. Stop lying for that con man.
[QUOTE=Canada;3065934]Yes you are correct. Trump reportedly Epstein in 2006 to the sheriff in Florida. He kicked Epstein out of his club when he found this out and reported it. Yes you are correct not one of Epstein Democrat friends reported him. Only Trump reported him to authorities. Bill Clinton or Hillary did not report him. Yes a Republican was the only one to report Epstein to the authorities. Thank you for confining this.[/QUOTE]There is zero evidence or testimony that Trump reported anything to anybody in authority about what he and everybody knew Epstein was up to. That is not what my link says and you know it. The link has Trump thanking the police for arresting Epstein. The link does not have him reporting it to anyone. Nor is there a link or report stating the FBI or other investigation agency found a shred of evidence that Trump reported anything about it to anyone.
My guess is he called the police after his closest friend for 10 years, Epstein, was arrested for his crimes in order to get a sense for anything they might have on him too.
-
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;3065508]Wyatt, all that matters with job creation on this forum is who is president. It is blasphemous for you to say that company management has anything to do with job creation or destruction.
I hated Spirit when you flew coach. They had the worst leg room of any flights save for maybe Frontier, but when I upgraded to the big seats, they were great and even better than business class in the American majors. There is not much to mourn with the death of Spirit, but I am going to miss those seats:[/QUOTE]Elvis, there is always a visceral response to Presidential actions. I try to tell friends and family stick to a specific issue / policy and we can have more clarity even if we disagree. If one falls into the rabbit hole of opposing the President (whoever that is) on every matter, I think the dialogue suffers.
I flew Spirit a couple of times when I was doing a quick turnaround. I had just an under-the-seat backpack. I usually paid for the big seat. I remember the regular seats were no thicker than cheap, plastic patio chairs. LOL.
Now as far as the viability of Spirit, it will make no difference with some members here that we were saying Spirit would not survive after the Jet Blue merger was blocked two years ago. Having some foresight offers absolutely zero credibility on political forums. No one's going to say "hey, that was a good take". The emotion is slightly fueled by the fact that the merger was blocked by the Biden Administration. So building on your thoughts above, Biden saved Spirit jobs and Trump destroyed them. You know that's the facts Elvis. (wink).
I have thoughts on why budget airlines do better in Europe. I think it's because there are so many great short-haul destinations where the planes can do quick turnarounds. Flying Spirit for over two hours could be very uncomfortable.
-
[QUOTE=EihTooms;3065547]And WWI?
There was no 1917 version of the fully confirmed, twice by Trump himself, Iran Nuclear Deal to monitor, restrict and control Germany's submarine warfare across the oceans threatening everyone. But if there had been and Trump was president at the time you could count on him to tear it up as the proactive reason America joined the War if not started it entirely. However, since that wasn't the case, WWI was hardly "Wilson's War" as it would have been Trump's War in that hypothetical.[/QUOTE]Actually, it's kind of known the United States was not exactly neutral in the early part of World War I. When the Lusitania was sunk by a German sub it was carrying a large amount of munitions and war materials.
I don't know exactly why Hitler declared war on the United States after Pearl Harbor. Some say it was because he viewed the USA As a belligerent country. Again, the United States was sending military aid to Britain and the Soviet Union. Anyway, it gave Roosevelt the reason he wanted to get into the European conflict.
-
Releaese the Files
[QUOTE=Canada;3065935]Please provide me with the name of one of the underage girls. You can't because there aren't any. So quit your lies. It is embarrassing.[/QUOTE]You'll have the proof when Trump's DOJ quits fucking around and releases everything they have. Did Pam Biondi say that she had them on her desk?
-
It's Racism
[QUOTE=Canada;3065937]Trump didn't have proof that Obama wasn't a citizen. That is why he demanded Obama provide his birth certificate. And Obama refused for years to show proof. Once Obama showed a birth certificate (real or fake) Trump stopped. That is why you should stop your lies unless you have proof of what you are posting.[/QUOTE]How can justify any rational person who makes such a request? How come Trump did not ask for Ted Cruzs' birth certificate when it is fact that he was born in Canada? How can you reconcile that Obama was born in Hawaii (A US State) and Cruz being a natural born Canadian?
Why do you feel the need to defend Trump? If he can't take it let him leave office-crybaby!
-
[QUOTE=Canada;3065785]Yes I am Canadian. Socialism is out of control here. Health care system is a joke. Taxes are ridiculous. Gas prices are $8 CDN a gallon and we have more oil than USA. Carney is a joke. He has handled the trade issue with USA terribly and may possibly ruin the Canadian economy. Canada has tariffs on everything coming into Canada from all countries and even charges tariffs between our provinces. He was elected because he was going to be tough with Trump. It was like Peewee Herman saying he was going to be tough with Hulk Hogan. Wasn't a fair fight. Still has time to be dumber than Trudeau. Canada inflation s equivalent to Biden inflation. Unfortunately Canada does not have a Trump as Prime Minister. Trump economy is best in the world right now. Canada economy one of the worse. Thank god USA didn't get Harris as president. Thank your lucky stars.[/QUOTE]Some things are in evidence but my Canadian Liberal friends are always in denial.
Canada had a terrible ten-year economic run under Trudeau. We call that a structural issue not cyclical.
Even liberal media outlets at the end, were editorializing about the sluggish productivity growth and low level of business investment.
During Trudeau's tenure there was an expansive increase in Federal employees.
Changing out faces Carney for Trudeau and the ensuing trade battle with the USA Gave the Liberals a new lease on life.