FKK Sharks - Darmstadt

To me, it's not so much about the look. It's more about uniqueness, vibe, and service, provided that look is in some acceptable level.

[QUOTE=Sirioja;3067613]But I don't think Ruby and even Jasmin are among the most attractive looks at Sharks. Jasmin is different, because very tall, but less attractive with weight. Helen seems to have success with Turkish now, they like real asses, not slim. Once again, some pretties work full GFE with FK for 100, when those asking the most expensive are not the prettiest nor the best. Paradox in this business, but good for me. I agree looks are not so impressive on this year at Sharks. I was much more impressed by 4/5 looks at Magnum with one almost 9, when none above 8, for Evalina and Elsa, at Sharks.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MaverickWagi;3067733]To me, it's not so much about the look. It's more about uniqueness, vibe, and service, provided that look is in some acceptable level.[/QUOTE]Jasmin is different look, but not sure both are among best for sex. No FK for Jasmin.

BBQ seem to start, for Summer time. BBQ meat is usually not so good at Sharks, but not worse than diner since months. Fortunately, breakfast and at 4 pm are still good. Girls also starting to play in cold swimming pool. I remember really pretty Ivy ex Wellcum on last Summer, so sexy in water, before silicon, such pity when she had perfect naturals, but she wanted same than her friend who was less pretty than her.

[QUOTE=MaverickWagi;3067733]To me, it's not so much about the look. It's more about uniqueness, vibe, and service, provided that look is in some acceptable level.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Sirioja;3067613]But I don't think Ruby and even Jasmin are among the most attractive looks at Sharks. Jasmin is different, because very tall, but less attractive with weight. I was much more impressed by 4/5 looks at Magnum with one almost 9, when none above 8, for Evalina and Elsa, at Sharks.[/QUOTE]So let's establish that MW is correct. There is no arbitrary ruler for 8 or 9 or even 4/5. And faces are only a part of the component of beauty.

As I dig into Maverick' comment, I agree it's about the VIBE and that often starts with how both parties act. I am reminded of the 70's ad. Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't (Almond Joy TV ad) What I am looking for influences what girls I approach on the floor. I don't want a super skinny babe when I want Greek. First they seldom let you pound deeply and it isn't what drive me when I'm steering from behind. I have a knowledgeable friend with many many notches on his rifle. His mantra is that he often finds the top look ladies to be the ones that put out less in the bedroom and those down the food chain, working harder to entice you. There's a French term: jolie laide. Maybe you've heard it. It speaks also to the total "package" even if it only refers directly to the face. Charlotte Gainsburg would be one of the classic ladies and I'd take her to a room in a heartbeat.

In no way are either Jasmin or Ruby that big in the butt. Not as skinny as I prefer but far from large, and others might think them even tooo smallllll.

[QUOTE=Tintin1;3067846]So let's establish that MW is correct. There is no arbitrary ruler for 8 or 9 or even 4/5. And faces are only a part of the component of beauty.

As I dig into Maverick' comment, I agree it's about the VIBE and that often starts with how both parties act. I am reminded of the 70's ad. Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't (Almond Joy TV ad) What I am looking for influences what girls I approach on the floor. I don't want a super skinny babe when I want Greek. First they seldom let you pound deeply and it isn't what drive me when I'm steering from behind. I have a knowledgeable friend with many many notches on his rifle. His mantra is that he often finds the top look ladies to be the ones that put out less in the bedroom and those down the food chain, working harder to entice you. There's a French term: jolie laide. Maybe you've heard it. It speaks also to the total "package" even if it only refers directly to the face. Charlotte Gainsburg would be one of the classic ladies and I'd take her to a room in a heartbeat.

In no way are either Jasmin or Ruby that big in the butt. Not as skinny as I prefer but far from large, and others might think them even tooo smallllll.[/QUOTE]When I'm French, I would not pay for Charlotte Gainsbourg. I like who she is, but I would not run after her for sex. I would say Jasmin and Ruby have thick ass, really not slim. Matter of eyes and each one own taste. I think Jasmin was prettier at Gold for 50.

Well said! Most of time I select girls for specific reasons. Face is secondary and subjective. In my eyes, shark girls are not one strongly better than others (I'm sure many of you might not agree, but it's just my view).

I picked Jasmine for her height, Ruby for her cool freakish vibe, Helen for her butt, Baltic Anjelica for her huge MILF butt, DE Mary for her Barbie resemblance. They all have something for me to remember even after a long long time. I would not remember their face for sure by that time.

[QUOTE=Tintin1;3067846]…There is no arbitrary ruler for 8 or 9 or even 4/5. And faces are only a part of the component of beauty.….[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MaverickWagi;3067856]Well said! Most of time I select girls for specific reasons. Face is secondary and subjective. In my eyes, shark girls are not one strongly better than others (I'm sure many of you might not agree, but it's just my view). I picked Jasmine for her height, Ruby for her cool freakish vibe, Helen for her butt, Baltic Anjelica for her huge MILF butt, DE Mary for her Barbie resemblance. They all have something for me to remember even after a long long time. I would not remember their face for sure by that time.[/QUOTE]For me the face is primary, and of course, subjective. But, if I don't like a girl's face, then I absolutely will never choose her, and the rest about her won't matter to me. In fact, a really pretty face can make up for weaknesses, like too small tits or not enough ass. Hey, if I can't get past that face, then I will never be getting to them there hind parts! But her face. Butterface!

[QUOTE=MaverickWagi;3067856]Well said! Most of time I select girls for specific reasons. Face is secondary and subjective. In my eyes, shark girls are not one strongly better than others (I'm sure many of you might not agree, but it's just my view).

I picked Jasmine for her height, Ruby for her cool freakish vibe, Helen for her butt, Baltic Anjelica for her huge MILF butt, DE Mary for her Barbie resemblance. They all have something for me to remember even after a long long time. I would not remember their face for sure by that time.[/QUOTE]Of course, if You pay for look of Anjelika or even now Ruby among by far largest casting in whole FKK land, then I can t say much. I may have a big problem when I left full balls on my last visit on a Sunday with more than 100 girls, I may have become too German, not even enjoying so many asses and not Helen s, or when I don t find attractive one at Globe or Aphrodisia Zurich city. But, I refuse to lower my standard and I was confirmed not to at Magnum where I felt hard as soon seeing a great full natural immaculate beauty from Germany, feeling such desire and was even really easy to finish, not even needing intense fucking.

BBQ and even icecream now at Sharks.

[QUOTE=MaverickWagi;3067856]Well said! Most of time I select girls for specific reasons. Face is secondary and subjective. In my eyes, shark girls are not one strongly better than others (I'm sure many of you might not agree, but it's just my view).

I picked Jasmine for her height, Ruby for her cool freakish vibe, Helen for her butt, Baltic Anjelica for her huge MILF butt, DE Mary for her Barbie resemblance. They all have something for me to remember even after a long long time. I would not remember their face for sure by that time.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Sirioja;3067850]When I'm French, I would not pay for Charlotte Gainsbourg. I like who she is, but I would not run after her for sex.[/QUOTE]



Completely agree. And I expect the vast majority of senior members have something they look for as part of any erotic notion. Faces only get you so far when you get into the Zimmer. One of my top 5 sessions was with the Tattoed lady with body piercings (on her back). I mean slutty aggressive fantastically experienced lady. Hats off to her and her 3-condom solution to my drive. Saw her again a few weeks ago and I wondered what triggered my hypothalamus to go crazy. Not attractive by most standards but amazing.

Hey Charlotte Gainsbourg just called and said. Don't worry. She doesn't think you're attractive enough to take to bed either ha ha!!

[QUOTE=TheCane;3067889]For me the face is primary, and of course, subjective. But, if I don't like a girl's face, then I absolutely will never choose her, and the rest about her won't matter to me. In fact, a really pretty face can make up for weaknesses, like too small tits or not enough ass. Hey, if I can't get past that face, then I will never be getting to them there hind parts! But her face. Butterface![/QUOTE]If I don't like the face, I can't FK and no good sex for me without FK.

[QUOTE=Tintin1;3067952]Completely agree. And I expect the vast majority of senior members have something they look for as part of any erotic notion. Faces only get you so far when you get into the Zimmer. One of my top 5 sessions was with the Tattoed lady with body piercings (on her back). I mean slutty aggressive fantastically experienced lady. Hats off to her and her 3-condom solution to my drive. Saw her again a few weeks ago and I wondered what triggered my hypothalamus to go crazy. Not attractive by most standards but amazing.
Hey Charlotte Gainsbourg just called and said. Don't worry. She doesn't think you're attractive enough to take to bed either ha ha!![/QUOTE]Tattooed German Kira? In France, we have much prettier ones than Charlotte Gainsbourg and much better singer.

[QUOTE=Sirioja;3067959]If I don't like the face, I can't FK and no good sex for me without FK.[/QUOTE]Both face and feet are to be to my liking otherwise my enjoyment of the encounter is diminished.

To each their own, personal preference sets the priorities. I 100% agree with the statement below. BTW. A pretty face is one of the uniquenesses too.

[QUOTE=TheCane;3067889]…..if I don't like a girl's face, then I absolutely will never choose her, and the rest about her won't matter to me. In fact, a really pretty face can make up for weaknesses, like too small tits or not enough ass….[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Turgid;3068111]Both face and feet are to be to my liking otherwise my enjoyment of the encounter is diminished.[/QUOTE]Face is much more important for me than feet and more important than ass or tits. No pretty face with beautiful teeth is no desire for me, Megan was a good example for desire, from her beautiful smile on beautiful face. Despite unreal tits, Brenda face is not. I hate like eagle, but very good care for nails and legs shaving is very sexy for me. When French manicure, I think girl did for me, exciting me, same than girls who have BF, I love to make them cum.

2 Cz girls at Sharks. Also some Germans, but no top attractive seen on this year, compare to previous years. Vivi, half Kazakh German, has superb face, but not enough to be attractive. Elena was really fresh but not exceptional. I would be happy if Paris came back for third year, quite normal for me.