Printable View
[QUOTE=Member #2041]Very nice set of pics, but this is the worst place for a watermark:
[url]http://www.internationalsexguide.info/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=130938[/url][/QUOTE]
Of course, my copy is hi res and no watermark ;) But if you want to take your own you will find she is a very camera-friendly young lady, once she trusts you, and lets you stick it where you like. ;)
[QUOTE=Christopherd]Of course, my copy is hi res and no watermark ;) But if you want to take your own you will find she is a very camera-friendly young lady, once she trusts you, and lets you stick it where you like. ;)[/QUOTE]
Hi Chris,
A watermark is only meant to mark a picture for legal reasons but then you still have to realize that you need permission of the girl. For your legal rights a small mark in a corner of the picture will do.
The remark made by Member is because your watermark is spoiling your own pictures and is very disturbing for all viewers.
If your reason for your watermark is not to show the girl then the best solution is not to post the picture.
Cheers!
I don't usually take pictures, but for some reason I did during a recent trip. The first girl is from Barbarella (R400 TLN). I basically paid for the fake boobs. The second is from Balcony (R300 TLN). I have both of their numbers if you want them. I'm sure they can be negotiated with.
Thought I would contribute. These are some pictures a few years back. I'll be back to Rio in Sept so look for some updated pics.
BTW these are Centaurus girls we got to come through for the nightly festivities.
[QUOTE=Christopherd]I probably shouldn't bother replying as a) I have a legal background and you apparently don't, or aren't familiar with the law on this area; b) I post photos and you apparently don't; c) I'm quite familiar with how basic watermark programs work and usually write about something more pertinent, such as finding women, putting photos in photos threads and photo chitchat in photo chitchat threads - all of which you apparently don't.
This is the first batch of photos I have watermarked in ISG. The reason, should you have the faintest interest, is to dissuade trolls who don't post their own original material from taking the photos and posting them on other sections under other countries, passing them off as their own genuine experiences. This has been a reported problem on a number of forums in ISG.
[/QUOTE]
Let me say first that I didn't take these photos; they should be credited to Christopherd. He knows law. I know photos. These watermarks are easy to remove! I think it would be unethical to go further and remove the blur!
-J
[QUOTE=Lorenzo] ... The idiots criticizing you are just that--idiots--and the best thing to do, as with all idiots, is just ignore them ... [/QUOTE]
Of course we were all criticizing the watermarks, not the photos. Failing to understand this, plus getting to use insults so quickly, demonstrates a low intelligence level on your part.
On the positive part, here is a nice memory ... non watermarked.
B.B.
no editing, watermarks, DRMs, or covering up of dirty bits, accidental or otherwise - just straight clues for the clueless or quiet winks to the wise. Feel free to photoshop to heart's content and place inbetween pages of your top-shelf-magazine (or else buy a plane ticket or two).
[i]this was so much less hassle than posting ill-appreciated bunda - please enjoy or ignore[/i]
[quote][QUOTE=Bimbo]Of course we were all criticizing the watermarks, not the photos.[/quote][quote=Christopherd - or almost posted]How kind of you to speak on behalf of all the members. It will no doubt save anyone speaking on their own behalf in future.[/quote][/quote]
I express my regrets in advance for not including watermarks so those so inclined will have something to do. Here are the filenames of each photo - I am sure you can match them up:
- backtown bar with good music
- Disneyland
- Reverse ATM on this streetcorner
- English speaking difficulties - 100R frequently pronounced '250R'
- look-out post
- 1R a minute hotel - price includes girl
- no large bills were damaged in the taking of this photograph
[QUOTE=Oracle1]Why is it that some guys like anal so much with beautiful women instead of going for the pussy? I have never understood that. Can you shed some light pls?[/QUOTE]Some guys get freaky. Shit, if I could get my dick up a woman's nostril, I would try that too!!
-Helpmann :D
[QUOTE=Lorenzo][QUOTE=Bimbo Boy]Of course we were all criticizing the watermarks, not the photos. Failing to understand this, plus getting to use insults so quickly, demonstrates a low intelligence level on your part.....QUOTE]
Doh! Yer rite. A few yeerz ago I cudn eeven spell "monger;" now I be one.
Here's a photo of a female suited to your level of development.[/QUOTE]
Oh, I would not even touch any of your regulars!
We started with comments on watermarks, and you immediately led the discussions to insults. The level of agressivity that you are demonstrating here is suspect. Psychologists say that that the less verbal skills people have, the more violent they are, because their communications toolbox is so limited.
So you have just proven my point with your last post. The more insulting you are, the more you are exibiting your limited IQ. Go back to your forest and your regulars (we already know an ape and a donkey ...).
Regards. B.B.
[QUOTE=Bimbo Boy][QUOTE=Lorenzo]
Oh, I would not even touch any of your regulars!
We started with comments on watermarks, and you immediately led the discussions to insults. The level of agressivity that you are demonstrating here is suspect. Psychologists say that that the less verbal skills people have, the more violent they are, because their communications toolbox is so limited.
So you have just proven my point with your last post. The more insulting you are, the more you are exibiting your limited IQ. Go back to your forest and your regulars (we already know an ape and a donkey ...).
Regards. B.B.[/QUOTE]
I'll give you this much: you have enough self-knowledge to select the appropriate screen name.
Here are some ladies that I think will be perfect for you.
Can we stop this silly word and photo fight?
ISG is for adult, it is not a kindegarten!
I am not much into working girls these days, and more into girfriends. I find that sex is better (girlfriends can be trained to achieve even better performance than working girls). However, it is a much bigger investment in time and money. Working girls end up being much cheaper and hassle free !
This one I met on a dating site. 23 yo ... about half my age. She has a smoking hot body, but unfortunately is a fish in bed. Totally unresponsive and centered on her own pleasure. She is the daughter of a couple of famous local TV actors.
The key to bringing her to bed was praising not her beauty, but her intelligence and her tastes of music.
Enjoy.
Regards. B.B.
[QUOTE=Lorenzo]We're just having fun. Lighten up![/QUOTE]
might well be, but still I can't see the reason of posting on and on monkey pictures (human and animal) in this area of the forum...
again..just my thoughts
[QUOTE=D Cups]Nice rack. Thanks.[/QUOTE]
Answering public demand, here are some pictures of the lady with nice boobs. Please note that she is NOT a professional. Just a lady I picked up on the beach. She is a little heavier than my usual tastes, but I just found her too appetizing to pass her up ! Highly experienced in bed. I was surprized to learn a few sexy tricks.
A very nice memory.
Regards. B.B.
met her at MP. she had just arrived from Fortaleza. I saw couple of girls from Fortaleza my last trip and I felt they seemed to have better attitude and aimed to please and cost less too.