I have not noticed any lectures promoting bareback sex
[QUOTE=Turgid;2921601]The lectures on bareback sex gets it started.[/QUOTE]For sure a mention or question about bareback sex sometimes triggers a violation of this site's General Rules and Posting Guidelines against shaming or lecturing posters who do choose to have BBFS+CIP. But I can't recall any posts where the person who mentions it in a Field Report, asks about it or states a preference for BBFS+CIP launched into a lecture about it, shaming anyone else who does not want to do it.
BBFS+CIP is clearly a popular and, last I heard, perfectly legal option between consenting adults, free or P4 P, now openly offered by some girls in a Happy Ending massage shop, Freelancer Site / Venue or two. Same as DFK, DATY, ANAL, Rimming, COF, Threesomes, whatever.
I would no more expect nor want a poster to omit the mention of the availability of BBFS+CIP in a Field Report, if he so chooses, or to shy away from asking a question about it than I would want him to omit that this or that particular "girl" in a lineup turned out to be a Ladyboy. For many, the availability of BBFS+CIP or not is essentially as critical to the decision to appreciate and derive any actionable info out of a Field Report as whether or not the partner turned out to be a Ladyboy.
For some of us, the difference between engaging in bareback or being strictly forbidden to engage in it with a P4 P is that stark. As is any info about anal for others. Or info about COF, COB, BBBJ or HJ for others.
And, no, this post is not a lecture about bareback sex either. No more than it is lecturing about DFK or anal. Those are all just available sex options out there, as are COB, COF and Threesomes. Some P4 P girls will, some customers want them, some won't and don't, same as everything else.
A question or mention of any of those things is not lecturing about them at all. Neither is it shaming anyone who chooses not to engage in them. But warning or insisting any one of us ought not to mention them, ask about them or engage in them is lecturing. And I am not saying what you posted does that either. But it turns out the former is not a violation of this site's General Rules and Posting Guidelines while the latter is a violation of them.
I assume no one here is suggesting any mention of BBFS+CIP be relegated to the Safe Sex thread. Same for any mention of ANAL and DFK, right? But I am in the camp who would prefer any warnings about STDs and STIs be posted or sent to the Safe Sex thread. However, it is eventually going to be up to the Administration and Moderators anyway.
Shouldn't we all get the vaccine?
[QUOTE=Davey1965;2921730]In the US they are now encouraging both young women and boys to get the vaccine before they become sexually active.[/QUOTE]CDC recommends all preteens get the HPV vaccine. If they get the vaccine early, it will prevent them from getting the HPV that causes cancer when they do become sexually active.
Shouldn't we all get the vaccine?
I assume they think older people don't need the vaccine because they assume most older people don't have sex with 20+ different girls a year like us.
Thoughts?