Stupid shit in Medellin

[QUOTE=Gabacho;2713265]Are you having your fucking period bro? Sorry if I pushed your buttons LOL. Just listen to her talk and you will understand why Kamala Haris is a stupid b*tch in the same category as Marjorie Taylor Green and Sarah Palin. Only difference is she is a liberal and the other two are conservatives but yes all 3 are stupid b*tches.
PS: you can add Nancy Pelosi to the same category too for that matter.[/QUOTE]Tranquillo. I agreed with you on 2 out of 3 and liberal vs conservative had nothing to do with it. I'm just curious what your credentials are, that you can call a well-educated and accomplished woman a stupid be*itch.

I take it since you wanted to make it about my "buttons" that you likely have [B] no credentials or accomplishments to speak of [/B]. So it's OK [B]bro[/B]. I'm pretty sure it doesn't apply here, but the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution does give you the right to speak (or in this case, write) foolishly.

[QUOTE=Villainy;2713565]Put a sock in it. If you hate the US so much, don't go there. In the meantime why don't you tell us where you live. Or perhaps it would suck too much in comparison.[/QUOTE]Doesn't he live in MDE?

[QUOTE=Huacho;2713687]Doesn't he live in MDE?[/QUOTE]Hehe, right! He doesn't appreciate that all I did was copy the words used in the article that I was referring to, and replaced "Venezuela" with "USA", just to show how biased the article was. If mine was a "anti-American rant", then the article must have been an "anti-Venezuelan rant".

[QUOTE=JustTK;2713870]Hehe, right! He doesn't appreciate that all I did was copy the words used in the article that I was referring to, and replaced "Venezuela" with "USA", just to show how biased the article was. If mine was a "anti-American rant", then the article must have been an "anti-Venezuelan rant".[/QUOTE]You didn't refer to anything and you periodically go off on your anti-US rants. SO tell me. Where are you from that is so much better?

[QUOTE=JjBee62;2713230]Add me to the list of skeptics.

.... I don't believe there is a bench in La Isla outside of the girl's dressing room. ....[/QUOTE]When is the last time you went to La Isla? It's been remodeled and layout has changed.

[QUOTE=Huacho;2713687]Doesn't he live in MDE?[/QUOTE]Or his mom's basement. Anybody has met him? Just Kidding, I think Surfer has met him before. I have to do it so he can taste his own medicine. LOL.

[QUOTE=Nounce;2714187]Or his mom's basement. Anybody has met him? Just Kidding, I think Surfer has met him before. I have to do it so he can taste his own medicine. LOL.[/QUOTE]At least 2 other prominent members have met me. If you want to meet up you better do it fast bcos I am out of here pretty soon. I dunno where I will be in the long term, but in the short term I will be in a place where many fear to tread. It should be an interesting adventure and one that has been prompted by my experiences in Colombia over the past few years.

And BTW: Criminal was wrong as usual. Here is the article and post I clearly responded to:

"[URL]https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/venezuela-travel-advisory.html[/URL].

Yikes nevermind. ".

[QUOTE=Villainy;2713573]Tranquillo. I agreed with you on 2 out of 3 and liberal vs conservative had nothing to do with it. I'm just curious what your credentials are, that you can call a well-educated and accomplished woman a stupid be*itch.

I take it since you wanted to make it about my "buttons" that you likely have [B] no credentials or accomplishments to speak of [/B]. So it's OK [B]bro[/B]. I'm pretty sure it doesn't apply here, but the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution does give you the right to speak (or in this case, write) foolishly.[/QUOTE]Similar to my recent rant about "respected members" here. No one here is a paid consultant. Credentials and accomplishments have no place in a forum such as this. The content speaks for itself independent of the education, social status, wealth, religion, perceived intelligence, color of the skin or any other way you care to categorize a user. Everyone here at least starts with equal footing. This is the unfiltered InterWeb. Please leave so called "credentials" out of the conversation. I may have been guilty of the same in the past but really, each post should be judged on it's own merit independent of the source. Granted, some users are extremely predictable and seem to get bent a certain way every time, but the entire structure of this board and the way messages appear and fade, means all that really counts is what you see and read in real time.

These are 2 great independent news clips on the new president of Colombia. Watch them if you would like to listen to the issues not shaped by the political narrative of your own country.

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmIuqC2Rn1w&t=62s[/URL] (UK. Watch til 11:40).

[URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xay_2RusUew[/URL] (Canada).

[QUOTE=Osteoknot;2714538]Similar to my recent rant about "respected members" here. No one here is a paid consultant. Credentials and accomplishments have no place in a forum such as this. The content speaks for itself independent of the education, social status, wealth, religion, perceived intelligence, color of the skin or any other way you care to categorize a user. Everyone here at least starts with equal footing. This is the unfiltered InterWeb. Please leave so called "credentials" out of the conversation. I may have been guilty of the same in the past but really, each post should be judged on it's own merit independent of the source. Granted, some users are extremely predictable and seem to get bent a certain way every time, but the entire structure of this board and the way messages appear and fade, means all that really counts is what you see and read in real time.[/QUOTE]Yeah, you might have been on a 2 see induced halluciogenic rant. No one really cares if someone calls someone an idiot (or stupid be*itch in this case). But context is important if it is to be taken with even 1/1000th of a grain of salt. Is the OP an idiot? In which case his opinions should be ignored as a bad use of electrons (meaning his words on the internet). OR is the poster actually accomplished or well educated? Maybe then his comments merit consideration. The point, Ostee, was, there was [B]no context[/B].

Did the "stupid be*tch" vote to prevent drilling in San Francisco Bay and the OP is an oil guy and found that vote offensive? Or did she propose legislation while in the Senate to require sobriety monitoring devices in all new vehicles? Good goal but horrible invasive idea.

Given the "stupid be*itch" at issue is very well educated and has a very accomplished career, I think at least some explanation is warranted for the comment to be taken as more than "idiot speak."

[QUOTE=Villainy;2715027]Yeah, you might have been on a 2 see induced halluciogenic rant. No one really cares if someone calls someone an idiot (or stupid be*itch in this case). But context is important if it is to be taken with even 1/1000th of a grain of salt. Is the OP an idiot? In which case his opinions should be ignored as a bad use of electrons (meaning his words on the internet). OR is the poster actually accomplished or well educated? Maybe then his comments merit consideration. The point, Ostee, was, there was [B]no context[/B].

Did the "stupid be*tch" vote to prevent drilling in San Francisco Bay and the OP is an oil guy and found that vote offensive? Or did she propose legislation while in the Senate to require sobriety monitoring devices in all new vehicles? Good goal but horrible invasive idea.

Given the "stupid be*itch" at issue is very well educated and has a very accomplished career, I think at least some explanation is warranted for the comment to be taken as more than "idiot speak."[/QUOTE]Are we still going on about the Kamala Harris being a stupid b*tch thing? I was going to just let it go for the sake of not starting an argument on here but since you guys want to bring it up agn, let's see.

1. She claims to be African American when she in fact is not. This even surprised me and was brought to my attention by my ex-fiance / bm who is black. Kamala is actually masquerading as an African American so she could win over black voters, she actually is like half Jamaican and half Indian and shares little in common with African American culture.

2. She claimed to be a progressive prosecutor when she was SF District Attorney, offering delayed sentences, diversion programs, charging felonies as misdemeanors, etc. Which resulted in an increase in crime that you see in SF (smash and grab robberies at Walgreens, increased shoplifting, muggings, etc.).

3. She fucked Willie Brown to get into her career.

4. When she gives interviews and press conferences she always deflects questions and doesn't give the answers to simple yes or no questions. She just deflects the questions and then does her annoying laugh.

5. She doesn't have any real experience in politics. Her domestic policy is a joke too. Wasn't she placed in charge of fixing the problems at the border? Look at what just happened in San Antonio with the 53 dead migrants in the truck trailer?

6. She is a fucking disgrace.

[QUOTE=Villainy;2715027]Yeah, you might have been on a 2 see induced halluciogenic rant. No one really cares if someone calls someone an idiot (or stupid be*itch in this case). But context is important if it is to be taken with even 1/1000th of a grain of salt. Is the OP an idiot? In which case his opinions should be ignored as a bad use of electrons (meaning his words on the internet). OR is the poster actually accomplished or well educated? Maybe then his comments merit consideration. The point, Ostee, was, there was [B]no context[/B].

Did the "stupid be*tch" vote to prevent drilling in San Francisco Bay and the OP is an oil guy and found that vote offensive? Or did she propose legislation while in the Senate to require sobriety monitoring devices in all new vehicles? Good goal but horrible invasive idea.

Given the "stupid be*itch" at issue is very well educated and has a very accomplished career, I think at least some explanation is warranted for the comment to be taken as more than "idiot speak."[/QUOTE]A little bit of a low blow evoking tussi as part of my reasoning, but I can handle it. "Idiot speak" speaks for itself, without any additional explanation. You may have the last word if needed, on this thread.

[QUOTE=Gabacho;2715106]

1. She claims to be African American when she in fact is not. This even surprised me and was brought to my attention by my ex-fiance / bm who is black. Kamala is actually masquerading as an African American so she could win over black voters, she actually is like half Jamaican and half Indian and shares little in common with African American culture.[/QUOTE]Yes her father was Jamaican. How did the blacks in Jamaica get there? Same way as in the US. She was born and grew up in Oakland. Ever been there? It sure isn't exactly pale over there. I'm pretty sure she identified as black (afro-american) growing up. She attended Howard University which is a HBCU. (Historically Black College / University) She is 1/2 black, after all.

Just as an aside, there aren't that many blacks in the US that don't have some amount of "plantation blood". Should they be called frauds also??

[QUOTE=Gabacho;2715106]2. She claimed to be a progressive prosecutor when she was SF District Attorney, offering delayed sentences, diversion programs, charging felonies as misdemeanors, etc. Which resulted in an increase in crime that you see in SF (smash and grab robberies at Walgreens, increased shoplifting, muggings, etc.).[/QUOTE]Maybe you don't remember the Democratic primaries. Harris was ousted because her record was too tough on crime. I know you don't believe it but I remember it, she was a star after the first debate because she stuck a knife in Biden. She became the instant super-star but after that Tulsi Gabbert gutted her on her record as a overly tough District Attorney and later Attorney General for California. She wasn't able to defend against those charges.

[QUOTE=Gabacho;2715106]3. She fucked Willie Brown to get into her career.[/QUOTE]Not the greatest judgement dating a married man. But we all be fuckin' someone. As to Willie helping her? She won the election for District Attorney of SF and she won reelection unopposed. I think Senator Diane Feinstein's support had more to do with helping her than anything else.

[QUOTE=Gabacho;2715106]4. When she gives interviews and press conferences she always deflects questions and doesn't give the answers to simple yes or no questions. She just deflects the questions and then does her annoying laugh.[/QUOTE]If you say so. I think of her as the prototypical vice-president. Rarely seen and even more rarely heard.

[QUOTE=Gabacho;2715106]5. She doesn't have any real experience in politics. Her domestic policy is a joke too. Wasn't she placed in charge of fixing the problems at the border? Look at what just happened in San Antonio with the 53 dead migrants in the truck trailer[/QUOTE]Total BS. 7 years as District Attorney of SF, 6 years as Attorney General of California, 4 years as US Senator from California. All of those are elected positions. That would give her more experience in politics than many of our Presidents. And a hell of a lot more than the last clown.

Oddly enough you don't seem to understand that the VP doesn't "set policy" the president does.

[B]President Biden has directed Ambassador Susan Rice, Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, to lead a Domestic Policy Council system that brings greater dignity, equity, opportunity, and prosperity to the everyday lives of Americans. Staffed by policy experts on a range of issues, the DPC will craft and implement policies on everything from education to health and immigration, along with cross-cutting issues that tackle the profound and multifaceted challenges and opportunities before us.[/B]

[URL]https://www.whitehouse.gov/dpc/[/URL]

She was asked to find a solution to the problems at the Southern border and hasn't had any success. I think it is absurd to say it is her fault that the 53 migrants died in the trailer. No one in 100 years has been able to fix the problem at the border. Trump's wall sure didn't seem to stop anything. What was that poem??

Your wall is pretty, Your wall is new.

Over, under, around and through.

We like to call it Trump avenue.

[QUOTE=Gabacho;2715106]6. She is a fucking disgrace.[/QUOTE]Whatever you say buddy. I'm sure your irrationality would change 180 degrees if she put an [B]R[/B] next to her name. Oh and before you ask it. I'm not Willie Brown.

So why do I defend her? For some years I worked in the Securities Industry. (But not in California) One of the big problems was that many state and municipal investment managers started taking "incentives" to learn about the derivatives markets (options basically) and they started making outrageously risky moves which nearly bankrupted some municipalities and Harris as attorney general pushed for and got through legislation than prohibited or drastically curtailed the amount of risk that cities and counties could take on. When they started to lose revenue, they were forced to adhere to a budget and cut salaries or positions. This was critical in helping California from continuously having to bail out counties and cities that went bankrupt.

[QUOTE=Gabacho;2715106]Are we still going on about the Kamala Harris being a stupid b*tch thing? I was going to just let it go for the sake of not starting an argument on here but since you guys want to bring it up agn, let's see. ...[/QUOTE]I can add another point. A Democrat being elected to any position in California does not make them "accomplished". As you stated, she got her start in politics by fucking Willie Brown. After that, she only had to get her name, with a D next to it, on the ballot.

If she is so accomplished, why did she drop out of the presidential race so early? Also, why does she have a 35% approval rating, and a 48% disapproval?

[QUOTE=FunLuvr;2715174]I can add another point. A Democrat being elected to any position in California does not make them "accomplished".[/QUOTE]Fair enough but she did have to win primaries and at least one run-off to get elected.

[QUOTE=FunLuvr;2715174]As you stated, she got her start in politics by fucking Willie Brown.[/QUOTE]Trump was married and fucking porn-stars and playmates. I did hear you guys belly-aching about that. So what bothered you more? The color of her skin or who she shared her vagina with?

[QUOTE=FunLuvr;2715174]If she is so accomplished, why did she drop out of the presidential race so early?[/QUOTE]She started out as a star in the first debate when she humiliated Biden. But afterwards Tulsi Gabbert killed her by claiming she was a harsh District Attorney for SF and Attorney General for California and there was no good answer to those charges. After that everyone piled on and she plummeted in the polls and dropped out.

[QUOTE=FunLuvr;2715174]Also, why does she have a 35% approval rating, and a 48% disapproval?[/QUOTE]I don't know. Noone said she was charming or lovable. But that doesn't make her stupid.