Female Genital Mutilation
[QUOTE=Cucumber; 1409958]To Jake: Yes I think her clit or at least most of it was removed, and certainly her inner labia were. So her pussy was kind of funny looking. You could perhaps vaguely make out some kind of rim around the vulva where there had once been stitches or something. I have never been with a circumcised girl before, but looking at her (and licking and penetrating her) I got a feeling that one motivation for such a culture might be to make adult womens' genitalia look like those of little girls, which it did a little bit. She said it was done to her when she was very small so she can't remember the event. She got her pleasure from vaginal penetration and it was one of those situations where she wanted more than I could really give (my only excuse being that she was my forth girl that night, and even on vitamin blue I didn't have quite enough energy for her. And it was a pretty good fuck).
(To avoid any misunderstandings: I am actually a fan of very big labia and I think the plastic surgeons who carry out labiaplasty are criminals, but it was an interesting experience).[/QUOTE]Cucumber, I know you did not mean to trivialize this issue, but I just wanted to pint out that those that are against this type of disfigurement of women will normally refer to it as "Female Genital Mutilation" rather than "circumcision." The latter term is often used by those protecting the act. I don't think any of us guys would call the removal of the head of the penis "circumcision" yet this procedure is as bad or worse than that.
Now back to more fun topics.
Mamba advanced search features are back
Just so you know, the advanced search features on Mamba are back.