I see you still can't figure out how to properly quote. It's amazing the number of ways you manage to make yourself look like an idiot. But, I guess you have to play to your strength.
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2473198]Uh, wait a second. I am going after the notion that Trump is being picked on for not following expert advice when the experts often have not had a clue. Peru followed all the advice the experts gave and had lousy results. You and JJBee are the ones all over the map.[/QUOTE]No. Peru didn't follow all the advice the experts gave. The government of Peru issued guidance based upon the experts advice. As was clearly explained in the Yale study, those guidelines were not adhered to by a significant segment of the population. The same has been true in Colombia.
You see, passing a law, or suggesting behavior isn't like waving a magic wand. It doesn't do anything, unless the people follow the law. Just last month Indiana made it illegal to have a cellphone in your hand while driving. I am, every day, in a unique position to see whether or not drivers have a cellphone in their hand. Want to guess how effective the law has been at getting people to put down the phone while driving?
[QUOTE]This is from today in the NY Times, "Health officials initially gave confusing advice around wearing masks in public. " First thing the NY Times says is that "experts" gave out bad advice about masks. I have said if there is evidence they may work, they should be used. The downside IMO is limited. JJBee and you were dead wrong then about everything being clear from the get go not me. Your line about "by extension" is just you lying. I never said I was against masks. I said the experts did not know what they were talking about. You two lost on this point.[/QUOTE]You threw a 3 year old temper tantrum when you were told you had to wear a mask to enter a store. You whined, bitched and cried about it like a fucking baby. Seriously. Like a fucking baby. Too late to change your story on that point.
"Experts. " There was no confusion from experts. The confusion was that a lot of brainless fuckweasels like yourself can't tell an expert from an enema. You actually get it completely wrong every time. The more shit someone is spewing, the more of an expert you think they are. The experts at the beginning said "stay home", "don't hoard masks", "keep your distance" and "you don't need N95 masks to go to Walmart. " Your"experts said "masks cause oxygen deprivation", "masks don't work" and "masks are unconstitutional. ".
[QUOTE]Peru and Colombia are absolute proof that generalized quarantines do not work. There is nothing else to talk about with that. Quarantining people who are not sick and have not been exposed to the virus is as boneheaded a concept as I have seen. You have lost here as well.[/QUOTE]You are absolute proof that it's possible to have an effective IQ under 20. There was no generalized quarantine in Colombia or Peru. Quarantines were ordered. Compliance is another story. Several board members have reported several times on both El Centro and Santa Fe. Did they report that both places were empty? No. They didn't. In fact some reports stated there were more people than before the quarantine.
For those who have large Facebook friend lists, they've seen posts every night showing parties going on. I've had girls I talk to in cities from Cucuta to Armenia tell me that it's mostly been business as usual.
[QUOTE]Social distancing IS a waste of time when it comes to the spread of the virus. It is a ruse to trace people to get their contact information because you need people to be six feet apart so the GPS on their phone can tell them apart. That data is being used right now: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/analysis-data-15m-phones-shows-some-americans-are-gathering-pre-n1229636.
So you lose on this point as well when you indicated this collection is not going on.
Using GPS data to track people's movements does work. I cannot say that you lost the point totally on social distancing, but if you think you are safe being 6 feet away from someone who is infected with Covid at Walmart but unsafe at 4 feet, you are an idiot.
Using phone data by the way is legal by the way if it is anonymous. But if you think this data is anonymous as are your medical records, I have a bridge to sell you.[/QUOTE]Bouncing around like a rubber ball again I see. I'm getting confused here. Is social distancing effective at stopping the spread of the virus, which is what you claimed for Texas? Or is social distancing not effective for stopping the spread of the virus which is what you claimed for New York and what you're claiming now. Does the virus call you up every day to find out whether or not social distancing is working that day?
Oh yes. It's all about tracking people's movements. Yep. Do you own stock in Alcoa? As often as you put on that tinfoil hat, it might be a good investment for you.
[QUOTE]You do not get to make a statement from New Haven on how people in Peru behaved by declaration. Given how readily available cell phone data is with regards to location and compliance, why is it not being used to back up the claim of lack of compliance? I have asked you for this multiple times to back up this claim and you have not provided it. Now you are trying to prove a negative which means you lost.
"The administration's travel restrictions were insufficient. " Colombia and Peru are absolute proof that travel restrictions did nothing. You lost this point as well as does JJBee when he claimed an air travel ban would have stopped the virus.[/QUOTE]No. On everything here. Just no. The claim of non-compliance for Peru has already been backed up multiple times. Your inability to understand simple English seems to prevent you from grasping it.
Once again, you duplicitous, cowardly, idiotic cock-nuzzling shit stick, pay attention:
In January, as I've said twice already, international travel restrictions, combined with aggressive testing and contact tracing, could have contained the virus in China. These things were not done. It's the same fucking thing that was done to contain Ebola. It's not too difficult of a concept to grasp.
As for Colombia and Peru, give it a fucking rest. Once a virus is among the population of a country, it won't disappear by banning international travel. The virus doesn't read the news and say "oh shit! They're shutting down international travel. We need to pack up and go to some country that's not stopping international travel. " It just blows my mind how incredibly fucking stupid you are.
[QUOTE]And the NY Times echoes your bird brained Fox News angle. "And the president's public statements including claiming that the virus wasn't serious and would disappear regularly spread misinformation. " This is as arrogant as it gets. If only we had a different president, the virus would not have spread. That is completely devoid of scientific evidence.
Given that 90% of the people getting Covid in my area are minorities, I think the evidence of Fox News and Trump spreading misinformation as a cause for the virus is incredibly thin. I think if people were asked about what Trump said about the virus most people could not remember anything specific. I cannot say you lost this point but I can say the evidence is not there.[/QUOTE]Although it's no longer necessary to point out that you're a brainless child with no understanding of anything remotely related to science, I'll state it again, in case anyone missed it.
It doesn't require a different President. It requires a President who follows common sense guidelines for infectious disease control. It requires a President who reads intelligence briefings and takes action based upon the advice of experts.
Doesn't matter at all who that President is, as long as he or she takes the appropriate action.
How many specific things Trump said about the virus do you want to hear?
Jan 22 - "It's one person coming in from China. We have it under control. It's going to be just fine.
Feb 26 - "You have 15 people, and the 15 within a couple of days is going to be down to close to zero.
Mar 17 - "This is a pandemic. I felt it was a pandemic long before it was called a pandemic."
There are plenty of other gems out there, but this has to be my all-time favorite:
Apt 23 - "I see the disinfectant that knocks it out in a minute, one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning? As you see, it gets in the lungs, it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it would be interesting to check that."
Nobody said that the cause of the spread of the virus is the horribly irresponsible information put out by Trump and Fox News. The cause of the spread of the virus is that it's a virus, that spreads. Because that's what viruses do. The criminally stupid misinformation spread by Fox and Trump has been counter-productive to stopping the spread of the virus.
[QUOTE]But Paulie, here is the most disgusting thing about what you and JJBee have been spouting, and it is the NYT first point.
"The United States has a tradition of prioritizing individualism over government restrictions. ".
The NYT solution is completely debunked by Peru and Colombia, but it shows what THEIR agenda truly is. They want us all to cede control to the government.
As for me, government action on AIDS and the opioid crisis were unmitigated disasters. If you want to believe the experts totally know what they are talking about, have at it. You have convinced me of nothing outside of the fact that you two are in total lock step with the NYT and their desire to take away our individualism.
It makes me wonder why you guys bother going to Colombia at all.[/QUOTE]Nobody is trying to take away your right to be a clueless ass clown. I fully support your right to prove your unparalleled stupidity as often as you desire.
Peru and Colombia have debunked nothing, because as had been reported from multiple sources, there was no effective lockdown in Peru and Colombia. You can lie about it as often as you want, but it changes nothing.
Wait a second. The government action on AIDS was an unmitigated disaster? But you've repeatedly said AIDS was a complete hoax which didn't happen at all. How can there have been disastrous action on something which, according to you, never even existed?
Take away your individualism? By telling you to put on a fucking mask? That's it? You're already such a fucking clone that not wearing a mask is the only bit of individualism you have left? How sad and pathetic is that? Here's a tip for you: Get someone to make you a mask that says"I'm not wearing a mask. " Boom! You've salvaged your individualism.
Again: Nobody else could be that stupid.
