Those that can, do. Those that can't become critics.
[QUOTE=Skwiskwis;1549839]"Underappreciated 7's"
Ah, well, how to put it, the one's I've seen photos of are 5's at best, and that's presuming the camera isn't overly sympathetic to them.[/QUOTE]Everybody's a critic...
I don't recall seeing any of your pics here, or any reports either, Mr. Skweegiman. :p
The Richter scale of attractiveness
I have to agree with yummy on this. I think even on your scale skwisk his girls would be 7's. What you have done skwisk is to take one of the most attractive Russian women (a 1 in 100k girl) and ranked her 10 and then ranked everyone else in comparison to this. On any scale of 1-10 10 should contain 3-5 percent of girls that would include most models (although some aren't very attractive anyway) and a lot of the most attractive girls you see in the street. The scale then works down appropriately. In this context yummy's girls are certainly 7's.
Yummy thankyou for your reports I for one enjoy reading them and am impressed how well you do especially as you don't speak much Russian). Yet)
Skwisk. When you do post some reports and photos of the girls you meet in Russia I am sure I will enjoy these as well as it seems you will have some stunning girls on there. Please don't think this is sarcastic. It isn't. I would love to read some of your reports.
[QUOTE=Skwiskwis;1550027]Or, to put it another way, if we all agree Natasha Poly is a 10, then there isn't any way the girls in those photos are 7s, since they in no[/QUOTE]