Photo Gallery

[QUOTE=Old Thai Hand].... I point to Asian Rain as one of the great perpetrators of pics that truly debase women. I think he ranks at the bottom of the barrel. Buttlover's double penetration shots rank a close second.

Here are a couple from the vault, which I hope are a bit better.[/QUOTE]
You are absolutely right about Asian Rain. As for the double penetration, well, it's not something I would do, and I certainly didn't need to see a picture of it, but if the girl agreed to it voluntarily.....whatever floats your boat.

Your photos are great as well, and they are truly artful and truly erotic. Thanks for posting them.

L

I think there are girls that I have respect for and then then are others just in the pure lust category, as these pics will demonstrate.

Pics were taken about 3 weeks ago but only just got round to start downsizing them. There are lots more (later). Not all top quality but have omitted the very bad (focus) ones.

Here is a lady I am trying to meet, at the moment we are only at the early stages (flirting and teasing on IM). I think that talking dirty and suggesting sex shows will scare her so I am pacing myself.

Love these boards but there does seem to be some sanctomonius, pseudo intellectual babblers about. The nonsense about 'What is and is not art' was a case in point which gave rise to a little chuckle, nay a guffaw. It is just not the sort of thing I log into a mongers forum for.

Kaintuck and Asian Rain, each in their own way, fill a niche (pun not intended) and provide good adult fare at the opposite ends of the spectrum, but I would wager a nights mongering money that if a poll was carried out, among member, as to which was the more popular, I think Kaintuck for all his merits would finish a distant second. It is my opinion that mongers like to see pictures of guys doing to girls what they themselves would like to do to them, and I don't think theres many out there who like to pose their bf in artistic poses and contemplate feminine beauty and leave it at that!

Just my tupence and I'll probably get flamed for it but so be it.

Sorry forgot to attach photo's to my last post and must keep the photo board honest.

She was a cute lass picked up from the parade of sin otherwise known as Beach Road.

WARNING: These pictures are decidedly low brow and have a splodge factor! Do not view if you are of nervous, sensitive or arty farty disposition.

[QUOTE=NicFrenchy]Here is a lady I am trying to meet, at the moment we are only at the early stages (flirting and teasing on IM). I think that talking dirty and suggesting sex shows will scare her so I am pacing myself.[/QUOTE]
Even with pixelated Camfrog, still awesome, so probably isn't going to be too wild. Respectful shots are fine when they this pretty.

[QUOTE=Mick Licker]I think there are girls that I have respect for and then then are others just in the pure lust category, as these pics will demonstrate.[/QUOTE]

Hey, Mick. Just wondering why you found it necessary to blot out her tattoos. Not objectionable. I'm not fond of tattoos. Just idle curiosity.

I like when every things work out and the girls enjoy as much as I do .One of the girl works in Japanese Karaoke and I picked her up in Spicy late night Disco, and the second one is old friend .

[QUOTE=Old Thai Hand]

Here are a couple from the vault, which I hope are a bit better.[/QUOTE]

Nice pics and artistically taken! Well done!

KL Guy

Here is a pic from a gurl I picked up from working at a cosmetic counter at a large BKK Department Store.

Joined up on camfrog and have found it to be very interesting. Some of those gurls love to tease and show off.

[QUOTE=Gamahucher]WARNING: These pictures are decidedly low brow and have a splodge factor! Do not view if you are of nervous, sensitive or arty farty disposition.[/QUOTE]
IMHO, this warning was entirely unnecessary. I felt that the dispersion of splooge in the last photo had a definite Jackson Pollack-esque quality to it.

[quote]I agree with you 100% about the board being awash in disgusting photos that completely lack any eroticism, whatsoever. I point to Asian Rain as one of the great perpetrators of pics that truly debase women. I think he ranks at the bottom of the barrel. Buttlover's double penetration shots rank a close second.[/quote]I have to disagree. I have been a lurker for a too long time, and I must say that AsianRain's post are the best. Whenever I got the bliues(rarely, I cure the itch do some local thai or PI ladies), I look up ARs posts.

As too Old Thai Hand. I can agree halfways that paler looking ladies can be more atracticve, but merely beacuse most of them got eduaction. Been with a few, but when it all comes down to what we blokes prefer, it is a quick fix and then take of ourselves. At least that is what I like about Thailand.

Cheers to all!

Kunden

[QUOTE=Member #2041]IMHO, this warning was entirely unnecessary. I felt that the dispersion of splooge in the last photo had a definite Jackson Pollack-esque quality to it.[/QUOTE]
I assume you were joking somewhat. We all have very different ideas of what is erotic and what is artistic, and particularly what is ugly. Each to their own, but I am very happy to receive a warning. :)
I am not a Pollock fan (who is? LOL) and don't go for "splooge". :eek:

I thanked ButtLover for his warnings too.
While not homophobic, those shots would probably just not do it for me. I never watch pornos with 1 girl and multiple guys and yet I like 1 guy on multiple girls. It just personal taste.

I certainly choose not to view certain types of photos.
If they are not good looking girls, nice bodies, or at least sexy erotic shots, then i wouldn't bother.
I understand that others like ARs photos, but fortunately I know from experience not to open those ones.

Those who don't want a warning can ignore it. But its a good idea, (IMHO of course), to describe roughly what the photos are like where and when taken (for those in a serious time warp) as the Forum Rules suggest. Then those not interested don't need to waste time opening them.

[QUOTE=Member#2041] IMHO, this warning was entirely unnecessary. I felt that the dispersion of splooge in the last photo had a definite Jackson Pollack-esque quality to it.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Mick Licker]I assume you were joking somewhat. [/QUOTE]
Ya Think? Actually, you could delete the word "somewhat"

Hi
Reverse Cowgirl at Nana Hotel

[url]http://www.steekr.com/index.php?m=c9ae77e8&a=dc18f91e&share=LNK4163480217f1486c9[/url]

Buttlover