Stupid shit in Medellin

[QUOTE=Black Page;2500388]"nh" is the standard correct Spanish way to write ñ on a limited ASCII set.[/QUOTE]
I made some research and I must admit that what I wrote is highly controversial and cannot be claimed as absolutely true.
It is true that "nh" is often written instead of "ñ" when "ñ" cannot be accepted by the system and is generally accepted as a workaround, but "ñ" is something highly significant and simbolic for classic Spanish. Defenders of Tradition even wanted a law in Spain to forbid early computers which did not accept "ñ"!
Today, "ñ" is possible on all Windows and Apple, but since it is not in the first 128 characters of ASCII still it makes problems. For example, if I edit a post with "ñ", vBulletin removes all "ñ" from posts. I had to edit my post two times, to re-insert all instances of "ñ".
Moreover, it is not possible to use "ñ" in email addresses on the Internet.

[QUOTE=Black Page;2500561]I made some research and I must admit that what I wrote is highly controversial and cannot be claimed as absolutely true.
It is true that "nh" is often written instead of "" when "" cannot be accepted by the system and is generally accepted as a workaround, ...[/QUOTE]

nh in Portugese sounds the same to me. Español in Portugese is Espanhol

[QUOTE=Nounce;2500570]nh in Portugese sounds the same to me. Espaol in Portugese is Espanhol[/QUOTE]Thanks for the grammar class. Completely on topic. Thanks. Real smart. Like you said to me, This is a sex guide board. Not grammar level 10 larousse.

[QUOTE=Frank11;2500566]I'm still going to cancel my account.

Just wanted to say I was talking about an escort from Europe coming to visit a friend in Colombia. How could that possibly be off topic in a Colombia sex guide? Where does it say we can only talk about 30,000 peso an hour street hookers. What I was saying is on topic.

And what I said does make sense. What don't you understand? It's just a friend coming to visit another friend and then having sex. It's not calculos 6.

You don't make sense. Build your own forum. Then you can say fantastical statements like talking about escorts in colombia is completely off topic.

I was thinking of deleting my account about a week ago because I was just too busy doing other things.

Bye bye.[/QUOTE]This poster is about as nutty, peculiar, implausible, and lacking credibility as the last detected fraud. SJobs. Maybe one and the same.

[QUOTE=SpiderRider;2500586]This poster is about as nutty, peculiar, implausible, and lacking credibility as the last detected fraud. SJobs. Maybe one and the same.[/QUOTE]Really? Prove it then? You are completely rude and is evident through your own statement. You just lack the mental capacity to leave your own perspective and understand someone else's different mindframe. Since you can't do that your explanation for everything is that lacks credibility.

Explain your point of view with evidence instead of just making baseless accusations.

Spider rider is probably just sjob 2nd VPN account he created a year ago.

If only you could have some God-given power to actually verify I'm telling the truth. Only then would you understand how ridiculous you are of accusing me of being a detected fraud. Whatever. Paranoid spider writer.

While I was in El Centro last week, I wore a N95 surgical mask, a face shield, latex gloves, and when taking my street urchins arriba, they were required to wear a face mask and only pull down their pants. Additionally, I would only bang them in doggy, with only my zipper down, while wearing two condoms, and no face to face interaction.

On Saturday I returned to the USA via Jetblue and actually did wear what I listed above while travelling for almost 12 hours total with the N95 mask only off for a few moments while in the FLL terminal. I spent time flying on two flights wearing the above-mentioned PPE as though I was in a COVID ward of a Hospital.

It's probably good I departed Medellin on Saturday, because I could easily see myself getting infected, which may already be the case God forbid. I have other family members in my home so I am self isolating until the Tuesday before Thanksgiving when I'm going to get tested and hopefully will be negative so I can have a nice Thanksgiving dinner.

I observed a lot of desperation in the Chicas in El Centro, with many of them being very aggressive, and some of them begging me to take them.

While flying I was thinking that for a lot of the women working the streets of El Centro, if they had minor symptoms of COVID, not knowing perhaps they had it, I suspect a lot of them are working regardless. Granted, I didn't take up any girls I hadn't been with before, and spoke with them asking if they had any symptoms, feeling their faces to see if they had a fever. But who knows, they could of been infected without symptoms.

I'm not trying to scare anyone, but there is a clear and present danger mongering during this time, and I believe much more so in El Centro. I know a lot of guys are frightened and some not much at all. I kept thinking to myself that on Saturday I was all suited up in PPE while flying, while the day before on Friday I'm banging away in El Centro getting uncovered BJ's and the only protection being a condom during intercourse. And I was in these Love Motels naked rolling around on the beds touching all kinds of surfaces which weren't being sterilized after each use. These kind of thoughts are still going thru my head.

I had such a great time during my week in Medellin. I had three days of bliss in my apartment shacked up with a Nympho who fucked me around the clock, and got too bang a bunch of my favorites in El Centro.

Hopefully an effective vaccine is around the corner and I will return like the rabid dog I used to be before the Pandemic.

We hope to see you back here soon. Stay well in the meantime.

[QUOTE=Surfer500;2503009]While I was in El Centro last week, I wore a N95 surgical mask, a face shield, latex gloves, and when taking my street urchins arriba, they were required to wear a face mask and only pull down their pants. Additionally, I would only bang them in doggy, with only my zipper down, while wearing two condoms, and no face to face interaction.

On Saturday I returned to the USA via Jetblue and actually did wear what I listed above while travelling for almost 12 hours total with the N95 mask only off for a few moments while in the FLL terminal. I spent time flying on two flights wearing the above-mentioned PPE as though I was in a COVID ward of a Hospital.

It's probably good I departed Medellin on Saturday, because I could easily see myself getting infected, which may already be the case God forbid. I have other family members in my home so I am self isolating until the Tuesday before Thanksgiving when I'm going to get tested and hopefully will be negative so I can have a nice Thanksgiving dinner..[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Surfer500;2503009]I'm not trying to scare anyone[/QUOTE]It's quite obvious that you are. So let me add a counterpoint.

70% of the people who died from covid are over 65, of that 70% 96% of them had two or more comorbidities. The overall recovery rate from covid including all cases is 99.74% so there is no reason to run in terror.

The CDC has a web page that shows the running tally of deaths WITH covid distributed by age, it shows the total number of people that have died of all causes in an age group and then the number who died while positive from covid.

I used this to explain to one of my regulars who's 31 that whole 55,812 people between the ages of 25 and 34 have died so far this year only 1769 of them have been positive for covid when they died.

I'm not a denier, I know covid is a real thing and it tears through the elderly and infirm at a horrific rate but it's time to end the fear porn, if you're under 50 and in reasonable health you can swim in giant petri dishes where they are cultivating covid and if you're one of the 20% or so who catch it you're chances of making a full and complete recovery are 99.9 something. Covid is not ebola and it's time to stop pretending that it is because I'll tell you what's going to be the real killer with covid and that's going to be starvation. So far 1. 3 million people have died WITH covid in 2020 and the UN projects that an additional nine million fucking people are going to starve to death next year as a direct result of the economic damage from covid mitigation. 400,000,000 people (that's the entire population of the US, England, Scotland, Wales, Norther Ireland, and half of Canada) have been forced into extreme poverty due to covid shutdowns. That's 5% of the entire population of the world. That was after the first round only and now they are starting round two, by the time this is over there will be more than a billion people starving in the world.

I'm having a hard time saying this so people will understand it so let me try it simply. Whatever the problem is, if the solution means you destroy the lives of five percent of the people on the planet which will mean 20-40,000,000 deaths over the next five years, then you have the wrong solution. It's like if you're prone to headaches and I cut your head off I've stopped the headaches but have I really solved the problem?

[URL]https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/09/coronavirus-could-push-half-a-billion-people-into-poverty-globally.html[/URL]

If you want to see something really interesting you can go to the CDC's provisional death counts for covid and take the number from the "Deaths from all causes" column then figure out the average daily number of people who have died in the US, then compare that number to the average daily number of people who died of all causes in the US in 2017,2018, and 2019. Once you have that answer then you can scratch your head and say "that can't fucking be right" and do it again, then scratch your head and say "how the fuck can that be right?

Seriously, do the math and draw your own conclusions, all of this is available for anybody to see it.

[URL]https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm[/URl]

I know you have been a member here a long time and I'm not going to turn this into a long thing, in fact I won't answer it all, but please give some of those poor hookers a break and stop with the fear porn, the third world can't take another lockdown.

[QUOTE=Admin2;2505056]It's quite obvious that you are. So let me add a counterpoint.

70% of the people who died from covid are over 65, of that 70% 96% of them had two or more comorbidities. The overall recovery rate from covid including all cases is 99.74% so there is no reason to run in terror.

The CDC has a web page that shows the running tally of deaths WITH covid distributed by age, it shows the total number of people that have died of all causes in an age group and then the number who died while positive from covid.

I used this to explain to one of my regulars who's 31 that whole 55,812 people between the ages of 25 and 34 have died so far this year only 1769 of them have been positive for covid when they died.

I'm not a denier, I know covid is a real thing and it tears through the elderly and infirm at a horrific rate but it's time to end the fear porn, if you're under 50 and in reasonable health you can swim in giant petri dishes where they are cultivating covid and if you're one of the 20% or so who catch it you're chances of making a full and complete recovery are 99.9 something. Covid is not ebola and it's time to stop pretending that it is because I'll tell you what's going to be the real killer with covid and that's going to be starvation. So far 1. 3 million people have died WITH covid in 2020 and the UN projects that an additional nine million fucking people are going to starve to death next year as a direct result of the economic damage from covid mitigation. 400,000,000 people (that's the entire population of the US, England, Scotland, Wales, Norther Ireland, and half of Canada) have been forced into extreme poverty due to covid shutdowns. That's 5% of the entire population of the world. That was after the first round only and now they are starting round two, by the time this is over there will be more than a billion people starving in the world.[/QUOTE]I appreciate your perspective on this, and I happen to be over 65, hence this may help to explain my perspective, and what my fears were, and hence my report. It is refreshing to see a post from an administrator on this board, and I agree totally with your analogy.

[QUOTE=Blakman;2506423]So becareful out there. Wear your mask. Surfur and knowledge are the guys with inspiring details of centro.

.[/QUOTE]Appreciate the concern man, but I've already been vaccinated so I'm good to go. Much more scared of catching herpes or a knife in the ribs at this point haha.

[QUOTE=Rextor;2506437]Appreciate the concern man, but I've already been vaccinated so I'm good to go. Much more scared of catching herpes or a knife in the ribs at this point haha.[/QUOTE]Already vaccinated? Were you part of the Pfizer trial, if not, where did you get vaccinated?

[QUOTE=Surfer500;2506534]Already vaccinated? Were you part of the Pfizer trial, if not, where did you get vaccinated?[/QUOTE]Johnson and Johnson. I'm expecting around 60-70% efficacy, but I'm already young and healthy so not too concerned.

[QUOTE=Rextor;2506540]I'm expecting around 60-70% efficacy...[/QUOTE]On what basis? I understand that the J&J attacks the spike protein in just same way as most other recent vaccines. I believe the efficacy will be the same.

[QUOTE=Surfer500;2506534]Already vaccinated? Were you part of the Pfizer trial, if not, where did you get vaccinated?[/QUOTE]I recd the University of Chicago / Moderna vaccine 2 x including side effects, I feel like Superman, where are all the putas?

[QUOTE=JohnClayton;2506552]On what basis? I understand that the J&J attacks the spike protein in just same way as most other recent vaccines. I believe the efficacy will be the same.[/QUOTE]Different vector and dosage. The pfizer / moderna vacs have two injections and are mRna / nanoparticle based. JJ is adenovirus vector with just a single dose. I'm basing my numbers off of the AstraZeneca vac which showed 60% at a double dose of adenovirus. I would think that the JJ would be similar to that, but looking at the Phase 1/2 results of both vacs showed that JJ had a higher neutralizing antibody level. So I think the weakness of the single dose is balanced against the higher antibody count / immunogenicity to average around similar to what the AstraZeneca vac showed. But I'm just making this shit up so who knows.