Another swing and a miss by you
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2710981]Sigh. 2014 under Obama, [URL]https://www.aogr.com/web-exclusives/us-rig-count/2014[/URL], peak was 1931, week of 9-19-14.
2019 under Trump, 1/4/19, peak was 1075. [URL]https://www.aogr.com/web-exclusives/us-rig-count/2019[/URL].
Current rig peak under Biden, current, 740. [URL]https://www.aogr.com/web-exclusives/us-rig-count/2022[/URL].
In 2021, rig count high was 586.
And you are bragging about all the oil drilling under Biden? Hey, dummy, which is the most: 1931 or 1075 or 740? Well, if you are a dumb Dem, it is whatever number wants to be the most right?
What next you dumb Dem? The source not right? Or maybe you have an "expert" who can dispute, you know something like "the rate of increase in rigs is growing under Biden whereas it was falling under Trump. " Yeah, let us just ignore the pandemic and let you and the "experts" cherry pick numbers.[/QUOTE]Early January 2019 is the latest you can find for Trump? As I recall, he was a so-called potus right up until America kicked him out of office on January 20, 2021.
Got anything for what was happening under Trump in January 2021?
Biden on the rocks: 32% approval, 27% on economy
[URL]https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-on-the-rocks-32-approval-27-on-economy/ar-AAYHMZp[/URL]
In two new polls depressing the White House today, one put his approval rating at a career low of 32% and another rejected the president's finger-pointing on the economy.
The latest Civiqs ([URL]https://civiqs.com/results/approve_president_biden?uncertainty=true&annotations=true&zoomIn=true[/URL]) approval rating hit 32% with 56% disapproving of the president. Even Democrats are expressing frustration, with their approval rate at a low 69%, said the data.
At this stage of his presidency, Donald Trump was in better shape though also underwater with voters in the same Civiqs survey at 44% approval, 52% disapproval, numbers he rarely broke from.
Recent president have all had very temporary low approval ratings below 30%, according to Gallup, but they didn't stay there. Biden's trend line, however, has been steadily down in the Civiqs survey since May 20, 2021.
Driving Biden's disapprovals has been the public's dissatisfaction with the economy, surging gas prices and unending and spiking inflation.
The latest Rasmussen Reports ([URL]https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/biden_administration/57_rate_biden_poor_on_economy[/URL]) survey of likely voters found that just 27% were good with Biden's handling of the economy. Some 71% said his handling was fair to poor.
And when asked who they blame for the poor economy, a majority said Biden, not the many targets of his finger pointing including Russian President Vladimir Putin. Some 52% blamed Biden for high gas prices, for example, but just 11% Putin.
Maybe worst of all for Biden as he braces for the congressional midterm elections, 74% of voters told Rasmussen that the economy has "gotten. Worse" under the Democratic president.
[URL]https://civiqs.com/faq[/URL]
Civiqs, based in Oakland California, is a polling and data analytics firm that conducts public opinion research online. Since 2013, Civiqs has fielded over two million scientific research surveys, and collected more than thirty million responses to survey questions.
Now, let's blame Trump for all of Biden's failures. But if Biden was successful, those wouldn't have been from Trump's good work. LOL.
The President needs to stop blaming others and do his job.
"The President needs to stop blaming others and do his job. " - Joe Biden on Apr 20,2020.
([URL]https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1252389082723790850[/URL]).
"Here's my promise to you: If I'm elected president, I will always choose to unite rather than divide. I'll take responsibility instead of blaming others. I'll never forget that the job isn't about me it's about you. " - Joe Biden on Aug 16,2020.
([URL]https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1295133234637025284[/URL]).
"Putin's Price Hike hit hard in May here and around the world," Biden said earlier this month. "High gas prices at the pump, energy, and food prices accounted for around half of the monthly price increases, and gas pump prices are up by $2 a gallon in many places since Russian troops began to threaten Ukraine. ".
([URL]https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/06/10/statement-by-president-biden-on-consumer-price-index-cpi-in-may/[/URL]).
Let the expert comments (and blaming Trump and others) start. LOL.
We have theories but we don't have any evidence
[QUOTE=Elvis2008;2711296]"If you take 2 million cell phones and figure out where they are physically in a big city like Atlanta or wherever, just by definition, you will find many hundreds of them have passed by and spent time in the vicinity of these boxes," Barr said.
Sorry, but that is complete and utter horse shit. Use any app like google maps or Uber and it will pinpoint your location to within feet. Now the question is how accurate does it have to be. Let us say it is only good to within 100 feet. So someone who just so happened to have visited a place that had ballots earlier, just so happened to be within 100 feet of 10 ballot boxes at between 1 and 4 AM.
And how many other times have we heard you Dems blow off something as conspiracy theory with Trump and it turn out to be true? He was being spied on during his campaign? That was a conspiracy theory right? Yeah, that turned out to be true.[/QUOTE]That's what Rudy said. "We have theories but we don't have any evidence."
So Barr's analysis is bullshit because? Why? See that's the thing with you rigthtwingnuts. You have [B]no evidence[/B] but you [B]know[/B] that you're right. Rudy Giuliani said they had no evidence (to the AZ Secretary of State) but you somehow believe that he's wrong and you're right. Raffensberger said today that all of the claims that Cheeto Tweeto made were investigated and found to be BS. But according to [B]you[/B], those claims were accurate. These were RethugliKKKans [B]who wanted Donnie the Dumbass to win[/B].
Barr said, in addition to the quote above, that Di Sousa told him they had "lots of video" but he never provided any. To anybody. That's what this whole thing boils down to. Hair Furor and his merry band of idiots make all kinds of claims (which the cult believes) but they never provide any evidence because they don't have any.
The Mango Mussolini was spied upon? Care to provide proof? Because the guy that Durham interviewed said that it was all BS, that it happened while he was investigating something else.
And why do you rightwingnuts keep moving the goalposts. You said that the "circumstantial evidence" provided during Donnie's first impeachment trial was bogus simply because it was circumstantial. Now, you're saying that circumstantial is OK? Really? Why don't you just come right out and say what you mean?
So, let me ask a hypothetical question. You wake up one morning and find a pile of what appears to be horse manure in your front yard. You call all of your neighbors but nobody saw anything. You call every farmer and rancher around and one guy said that, yes, he found that his paddock gate was open that morning but all of his horses were there. So, there is only the pile of horse manure on your lawn but since nobody saw anything, the evidence that a horse did it is circumstantial. Did a horse crap on your lawn? If you say yes, then there was plenty of evidence that the Orange Buffoon should have been found guilty in his first impeachment trial. If you say no, how did the horse manure get there?
Your own two eyes? You are blind, so your own two eyes are useless. And Uber has your fucking address! Sheesh.
