London

What's happened to Scandalbabes? Used to be the best agency. Their girls looked like the photos on the site. Best for service also.Any of you mongers know about it?

You are in the right part of town.

1.street action.Avoid like the plague.Dangerous, and the police are very active.

2.Saunas

Signioritas at 2 chatsworth rd E5, about 1 mile from you.Take a mini-cab; there is a cab office there as well so you can catch a cab back.About 8 lovely oriental girls and 1-2 eastern european.£15 entrance and £50 for the girl.

Stratford sauna.Stratford, about 3miles from you.15 normally excellent girls in the most run down sauna on the planet.£10 entrance,£40 for the girl.

Crouch hill sauna.About three mils from you.Ask for the fitness first gym, it is opposite.Nice clean place.£10 entrance,£40 for the girl.Can't go wrong.

3.Freebies.At your age (ie young) go to soho for the clubs and bars and cafe;
Lots of foreign girls, should be no problem.Do not go there for sex. From dalston many buses go straight there, and night buses back.

Back section of your local paper has an adult section.

PM me if you require further assistance.

[QUOTE=Lokayatra]What's happened to Scandalbabes? Used to be the best agency. Their girls looked like the photos on the site. Best for service also.Any of you mongers know about it?[/QUOTE]

There is a thread today on ********* saying Scandalbabes ran afoul of the law and was put out of business (no further details). That is sad to hear as I used that service several times on London visits and liked them. I hope they reappear in a new incarnation.

V.

[QUOTE=Diceman]\Have you ever heard of Walter Mitty?[/QUOTE]
Yes I have heard of Walter Mitty and if you are suggesting my posts are comparable to his life ,you might want to take into context all the people on this board who I have given numbers to and who have utilized the same services as I have. I live in California and visit London quite often and my posts do have credibility which my senior membership from five years ago suggests.So just shup up and post reports which we all can enjoy instead of being a poser.

Well,I went there Thursday on the 8th and althoug the webpage suggested there were going to be 4 girls there,there were actually 2 plus one girl who called in so she was replaced by Katie who has her pictures on the webpage. Lorna Lace did not show up.Anyhow I met Bobby the organizer of the party at a bar called the Pride of Paddington where he led me to the basement where the party was taking place.It had a full bar mind you and most of the guys were enjoying it. The girls at the party who were active were Aprhodite and Nina who were already servicing 4 guys when I got there and then two arab guys and me followed.We were joined by Katie after an hour has ellapsed. To be quick the parties are excellent and the girls were into it.It was nice seeing after a while the girls actually enjoying the sex unlike most working girls.As far as I remember Aprodite was Greek but grew up in London .Nina and Katie were both Polish.All I can say it was money worth spending as Katie gives the best blow job you ever had.Most of the guys ducked out after fucking for say 5 times or so .I hung out with this other guy who came in light but did not have any more energy so I walked out after 3 hours.The party was all up in 3 hours though it was advertised for 4 .This was no fault of the girls but the mongers like us who could not get it up for a possible 5th or6 th time.At night I was taken to another party by my friend who joined me from Los Angeles at Earls court but I went there as an observer but the girls over here were mediocre.I did not take part in the action here,but I seriously recommend Gentlemens Relish parties to anyone.They have the best selection of girls and the prices for the party and the time allocated is more than generous.

Most guys came 5 or 6 times in 3 hours?? Is this correct Bono???

[QUOTE=Viagrant]There is a thread today on ********* saying Scandalbabes ran afoul of the law and was put out of business (no further details). That is sad to hear as I used that service several times on London visits and liked them. I hope they reappear in a new incarnation.

V.[/QUOTE]I'm sure it's something to do with *********.As they had taken off all their field reports about scandalbabes.They used to have gleaming reports about the scandal girls and their excellent services.No other agency provides the same sort of girls with the same services.

I was today at genlemens it was great we were about 8-9 guys and 4 girls.

The food was good and no limit drinks.

The girls 2 of them over 40 y.o. and 2 age 20-25. one is a super porno star and she act like that with us.

Was great time.

They just change place and they are near canary worf.

Thanks to iseeu.

ESSI

Yes, they seem to have vanished, and a contributing factor is apparently that they were banished by *********. In a response to my trip report in March, a fellow monger posted the reason was that the first review for each new girl was apparently faked by the outfit that ran the web site (which also ran the web site for Academy girls, which was also banned but appears to still be around at the moment -- with a redesigned web site, if that means anything).

Possible good news: based on some recent ********* reports, it appears some of the Scandies are now with the 90 Minutes agency at [url]www.90minute.co.uk[/url]. One of them is Pam, a Russian "blonde" I reported on last year. They seem to have quite the stable of young ladies, which I hope to try out soon. (Let's all keep in mind that many of the working ladies in London often advertise their services with more than one agency, and occasionally even with different names.)

I was sorry to see the Scandalbabes reviews taken away. Personally, I never had a bad experience with the agency, and even ended up getting near-free overnighters from one special provider with whom I hit it off (who has sadly since returned to her home country in the Stan-ish regions). But I guess that policy shows that Galahad wants to keep the board clean and credible.

Happy Hunting,
EM

[QUOTE=Fred Mercury]Most guys came 5 or 6 times in 3 hours?? Is this correct Bono???[/QUOTE]
Absoultely,you have to understand the first time around they just blew you just to get you to cum and then most of the guys about 5 or 6 times on average. There were three Arab and one black guy who were the most active and whenever I turne dout they were still fucking or doing something .Most of the others were drinking beer ,watching them fuck and talking about evertyhing from politics to banking and finance. This was my second time at a party and I have to admit that most of the guys who take part in this were either lawyers,bankers(me) or people from respected professions includng an Lse professor.

[QUOTE=El Mujerista]Yes, they seem to have vanished, and a contributing factor is apparently that they were banished by *********. In a response to my trip report in March, a fellow monger posted the reason was that the first review for each new girl was apparently faked by the outfit that ran the web site (which also ran the web site for Academy girls, which was also banned but appears to still be around at the moment -- with a redesigned web site, if that means anything).

Possible good news: based on some recent ********* reports, it appears some of the Scandies are now with the 90 Minutes agency at [url]www.90minute.co.uk[/url]. One of them is Pam, a Russian "blonde" I reported on last year. They seem to have quite the stable of young ladies, which I hope to try out soon. (Let's all keep in mind that many of the working ladies in London often advertise their services with more than one agency, and occasionally even with different names.)

I was sorry to see the Scandalbabes reviews taken away. Personally, I never had a bad experience with the agency, and even ended up getting near-free overnighters from one special provider with whom I hit it off (who has sadly since returned to her home country in the Stan-ish regions). But I guess that policy shows that Galahad wants to keep the board clean and credible.

Happy Hunting,

EM[/QUOTE]I don't think the messages were fake. About Stephanie, that was the best experience I have ever had. Not even your girl friend would give you such performance. Lots of the reports had even literary merit in them. The ********* reports had been taken off a few months before the agency's closure.

It's a shame if it's true. I used the agency just 2 weeks ago when in London, and got a pretty good service (inc CIM) with a very tasty and sweet young Latvian girl called Jane.

[QUOTE=Lokayatra]I don't think the messages were fake. About Stephanie, that was the best experience I have ever had. Not even your girl friend would give you such performance. Lots of the reports had even literary merit in them. The ********* reports had been taken off a few months before the agency's closure.[/QUOTE]
Mr. Lokayatra, I don't disagree with anything you say here. I would, however, request that you actually READ my post, which you liberally quoted. I didn't say ALL the reviews were allegedly false. I really know no facts about the matter other than what I posted, which can be verified by anyone willing to search all the way back to (gasp) March 2005.

I did in fact say that I never had a problem with the agency, and to the contrary had many good experiences with them.

(As for the timing of the agency's closure, was it not you, Mr. Lokayatra, who originally suggested it had something to do with *********? Perhaps you might wish to read your own posts as well...)

To Mr. TheKnight, I would have to say it's sad but true. I called the number for Scandies a moment ago, and it appears to have been disconnected.

Happily, there are many alternatives when I arrive in London tomorrow, and one favourite little piece has already been texted as to my arrival and whereabouts.

Happy Hunting,
EM

********* has a very strict policy regarding reports, which means that if one fake report is found all reports for the establishment are deleted. Admin says it is the only way they can realistically monitor the report system, as otherwise, once a fake report has been identified, they need to read every report and decide if it's true or not.

For ScandalBabes it seems a shame and fairly counterproductive. It seemed one of the few agencies that seemed to take it's presence on the net quite seriously - if a girl had 1-2 bad reports they usually removed her from their site quite quickly (or the girl moved on quite quickly), as they knew it would impact on their reputation and the girl must have seen a downturn in her business.

I'm sure there were some fake reports - they had 100s in total - but the questionable reports could have been generated from individual girls as easily as from the agency, and it seemed a shame that a lot of legitimate reports were lost. I think that Scandals remained a good agency for so long as they understood the importance to their business of keeping a good rep through the reports, and without the reports (and the inference of having reports deleted due to fakes) I'm sure their business suffered; personally I doubt this was the only reason they shut down though.

The whole thing seems slightly shortsighted from *********. If the site is suppossed to be about providing informatioon,then deleting all reports removes the information all together and, in this case, has possibly contributed to a good and accountable agency disappearing.

[QUOTE=Snowy]********* has a very strict policy regarding reports, which means that if one fake report is found all reports for the establishment are deleted. Admin says it is the only way they can realistically monitor the report system, as otherwise, once a fake report has been identified, they need to read every report and decide if it's true or not.

For ScandalBabes it seems a shame and fairly counterproductive. It seemed one of the few agencies that seemed to take it's presence on the net quite seriously - if a girl had 1-2 bad reports they usually removed her from their site quite quickly (or the girl moved on quite quickly), as they knew it would impact on their reputation and the girl must have seen a downturn in her business.

I'm sure there were some fake reports - they had 100s in total - but the questionable reports could have been generated from individual girls as easily as from the agency, and it seemed a shame that a lot of legitimate reports were lost. I think that Scandals remained a good agency for so long as they understood the importance to their business of keeping a good rep through the reports, and without the reports (and the inference of having reports deleted due to fakes) I'm sure their business suffered; personally I doubt this was the only reason they shut down though.

The whole thing seems slightly shortsighted from *********. If the site is suppossed to be about providing informatioon,then deleting all reports removes the information all together and, in this case, has possibly contributed to a good and accountable agency disappearing.[/QUOTE]I, for one, will be missing Scandalbabes and it's girls. Anyone who has read the rave reviews about Stephanie and enjoyed her performance knows that the reports were not fake. If I dare say, it's something going on between ********* and scandalbabes, and that's why the agency has disappeared. All other agencies do not take themselves as seriously as they used to do. Most of the agencies would not promise you the same performance and most of the photos on their sites are enhanced and fake. When you turn,up the girl looks quite different from what you saw on the site. I suggest mongers put their experience on this site of their experience in London, so that people don't waste their money.