Manila

[QUOTE=Boofa69;1270825]This my theory. You know why guys over 50's are having problems with prostate bcoz they do not have regular sex. So do yourself a favour get regular sex from young Filipina's and you never have to worry about prostate problems.[/QUOTE]Yes, Boo, it's not good to have that fluid backed up in your system so I agree regular deposits in your favorite crevices and cleavages is quite healthy. I find that San Miguel helps with the plumbing, too.

[QUOTE=Boofa69;1270825]This my theory. You know why guys over 50's are having problems with prostate bcoz they do not have regular sex. So do yourself a favour get regular sex from young Filipina's and you never have to worry about prostate problems.[/QUOTE]That is not just a theory. ' The Journal of the American Medical Association, found that frequent ejaculations. 21 or more a month, were linked to lower prostate cancer risk in older men, as well, compared with less frequent ejaculations of four to seven monthly. '

[QUOTE=Screaming Beaver;1271545]That is not just a theory. ' The Journal of the American Medical Association, found that frequent ejaculations. 21 or more a month, were linked to lower prostate cancer risk in older men, as well, compared with less frequent ejaculations of four to seven monthly. '[/QUOTE]Journals do not find anything-they are vehicles for research articles. While your claims may be true, siting the name of a journal without providing the source the citation or a link to it is the same thing as saying "they say."

[QUOTE=Screaming Beaver;1271545]That is not just a theory. ' The Journal of the American Medical Association, found that frequent ejaculations. 21 or more a month, were linked to lower prostate cancer risk in older men, as well, compared with less frequent ejaculations of four to seven monthly. '[/QUOTE]I'll confirm this. I have chronic PBH and have had a couple of biopsies (negative) for prostate cancer over the year. Every time I see him my urologist shakes his finger at me and sternly warns me to have regular sex. Who am I to argue?

[QUOTE=Wazoo;1271947]I'll confirm this. I have chronic PBH and have had a couple of biopsies (negative) for prostate cancer over the year. Every time I see him my urologist shakes his finger at me and sternly warns me to have regular sex. Who am I to argue?[/QUOTE]Well that does it then gents. A medical doctor confirms our suspiscions. Let the fuckin' begin (well, wankin' for TurdyCurdy. Oh shit, does that belong in the TC1 thread?). Gentlemen, start your engines!

[QUOTE=Sxxxx;1270029]One thing for sure, if told you have got prostate cancer, do not panic, I know someone who has had prostate cancer for 15yrs. When first diagnosed the Urologist wanted to rip his prostate out, presumably to help pay for a new yacht or something. That guy with prostate cancer is still cancer positive according to PSA tests. He has not allowed anyone to remove his prostate and he is happy and healthy. There will always be exceptions of course.[/QUOTE]Exceptions ey.

LOL ok. I have another cancer success story to contribute, very much in spirit of this discussion..

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8V70UXiAhU[/url]

There is merit in this recommendation.

I found the same kind of advice while researching my pamphlet on prostate cancer.

Risk minimisation strategies. Except that the number of ejaculations per month were different.

My advice was ejaculate twice per month. This includes sex, masturbation, HJ, BJ etc. Any way of regularly getting stored semen out of your prostate.

But I could not find information on the rate of reduction of risk that resulted from this.

G

[QUOTE=Screaming Beaver;1271545]That is not just a theory. ' The Journal of the American Medical Association, found that frequent ejaculations. 21 or more a month, were linked to lower prostate cancer risk in older men, as well, compared with less frequent ejaculations of four to seven monthly. '[/QUOTE]

Please move this conversation to the General thread, or take it private, or move to a prostrate oriented web page, or ask Jackson for a special thread. You might want to call it My Prostrate.

[QUOTE=X Man;1272188]Please move this conversation to the General thread, or take it private, or move to a prostrate oriented web page, or ask Jackson for a special thread. You might want to call it My Prostrate.[/QUOTE]I agree X Man.

Not really a Manila topic.

Please note it is proSTATE not prostrate.

[QUOTE=Red Kilt; 1272192]I agree X Man.

Not really a Manila topic.

Please note it is proSTATE not prostrate.[/QUOTE]As the prostate cancer sufferers say, I lay prostrate, thinking about my prostate.

And yes, I lifted it from another website, LOL.

What's the best area to stay long term in Manila? I need to be within a decent distance from Pasig and Pasay. I am considering Makati for obvious reason, but was hoping someone could give me some advice.

Makati broder around burgos street.

[QUOTE=Americanthief;1272795]What's the best area to stay long term in Manila? I need to be within a decent distance from Pasig and Pasay. I am considering Makati for obvious reason, but was hoping someone could give me some advice.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Americanthief;1272795]What's the best area to stay long term in Manila? I need to be within a decent distance from Pasig and Pasay. I am considering Makati for obvious reason, but was hoping someone could give me some advice.[/QUOTE]Assuming you mean the part of Pasig City that contains much of the business district immediately east of Ortigas Center, Shangri-la hotel and mall, SM Megamall, and Robinson's Galleria, then Makati is essentially midway between Pasig and Pasay. EDSA is an obvious thoroughfare for traveling between the two cities, although when traffic on EDSA is heavy the taxi drivers snake their way along other streets that only they know best. And Makati contains a large variety of accommodations at various price levels.

[QUOTE=Americanthief;1272795]What's the best area to stay long term in Manila? I need to be within a decent distance from Pasig and Pasay. I am considering Makati for obvious reason, but was hoping someone could give me some advice.[/QUOTE]I have lived in Ortigas Center (virtually on the Pasig / Mandaluyong boundary) for 15 years now and would always stay here because of the easy walking proximity to 4 major malls from my condo.

I have lots of visits to Makati / Pasay for business and it is never a hassle for me to travel.

Skip Kost gives some good guidelines. Rentals are slightly cheaper around Ortigas too than Makati (if that's a factor).

Is your work spread evenly between Pasig and Pasay? If it is 50:50 then I say go with Pasig. If it is skewed more to Pasay then stay in the south. If proximity to mongering venues is a criterion, then definitely stay in Makati/Pasay/Paranaque. There is nothing much in Pasig although you are midway to Quezon Avenue and the KTVs etc along there.

Gents,

I am doing a one night "fly-by" next week and wanted to get some "recency of experience" advice. I have been to Manila many times, but only to MBC rarely (like twice). I did okay there once and "crashed and burned" the second time. On the other hand, I have always been successful at Havana's and liked the venue. With the recent change in policy, it appears that particular place is no longer an option.

I have almost 0 experience staying at hotels in Malate as well.

What I am trying to determine, is what is the current status of the P4P scene in / around the Havana location? Did the business find another location in Greenbelt, did Havana's decide to let the gals return, is there a "better" place to go? Of course the other option is to venture over to MBC and try my luck again. One thing is for sure, P. Burgos is out of the question.

I will admit that one thing I liked about Havana's was the pricing and the ladies always seemed a little less hard, at least to me. Maybe I was just lucky.

I appreciate the help.

Sky