-
[QUOTE=Goatscrot;2312149]Could not agree more. The decline has been fast and steep. Last 5 years has seen venues disappear and attitudes change. Can't think of a single place in Asia that is as good or better than it was 20 years ago, for all the reasons you stated in your last sentence. Stadium was just unreal. Also the old Martini's and Sharky's in Nom Penh. Good times they were.[/QUOTE]I liked Tanamur better than Stadium, but both rocked. No other discos anywhere in Asia compare to those two. I think Tanamur was voted best night spot in Asia for over 10 years in a row.
-
[QUOTE=Smoothy;2312090]Whenever I read any report on girls that does not include photos, I just consider the girls to likely be dogs and disregard the report. Without photos, it didn't happen.[/QUOTE]That is ridiculous thinking. Berry is saying he can not get GFE. You are saying that because he did not post pics, then it means he actually can get GFE?
-
[QUOTE=Smoothy;2312090]Whenever I read any report on girls that does not include photos, I just consider the girls to likely be dogs and disregard the report. Without photos, it didn't happen.[/QUOTE]Why do you even bother reading this board then? If we follow your logic all that everyone here writes is make believe.
-
[QUOTE=BananaBoi;2312191]Why do you even bother reading this board then? If we follow your logic all that everyone here writes is make believe.[/QUOTE]I wouldn't say that everything is make believe. There is some factual information given about places and events. However, I never trust anyone saying they were with a hottie if they do not provide photos. One man's 10 is another man's 2.
-
[QUOTE=MrEnternational;2312168]That is ridiculous thinking. Berry is saying he can not get GFE. You are saying that because he did not post pics, then it means he actually can get GFE?[/QUOTE]Naw, I'm not saying anything about Berry. I am saying you claiming that you do get GFE is meaningless as far as I can see because you aren't posting photos. Anyone can get GFE from a girl who most guys consider to be less desirable. I don't consider that something to be intriguing. If you claim the chicks are decent or even hot, that may be your view of reality, but it may or may not be reality for the rest of us.
However, if a photo accompanied the claim, then we can all come to our own conclusion based on our own perception of reality, beauty, and desirability.
I can understand people not wanting to post photos. That's fine, and of course you don't have to try to impress anyone with your photos or even stories of your prowess and conquests. I really don't care one way or the other. I have no idea if your girls are great catches or girls most guys wouldn't walk across the street for a freebie. However, I do feel it prudent to assume the girls to be dogs whenever I read any story that specifies any girl but does not include a photo. I think it's only common sense. Too many times guys on here have claimed they were with a 9, then when I find out which girl it really was, she was a 4 in my eyes. If someone is getting GFE from a 9, that's awesome. If she's a 4, that swings the pendulum 180 degrees. And of course, all of us guys have different tastes. A photo can work wonders.
-
[QUOTE=Smoothy;2312341]However, I never trust anyone saying they were with a hottie if they do not provide photos. One man's 10 is another man's 2.[/QUOTE]I'd agree with your comment on different ratings. However, this makes the inclusion of photos as justification all the more pointless.
If someone shows his #10 who is statuesque, buxom and curvaceous, some will likely complain that she is too big.
If someone posts another who is tall, lythe with a dancer's ass, others will complain that she is titless and skinny.
Who is right?
Cheers. G.
-
[QUOTE=Goferring;2312357]I'd agree with your comment on different ratings. However, this makes the inclusion of photos as justification all the more pointless.
If someone shows his #10 who is statuesque, buxom and curvaceous, some will likely complain that she is too big.
If someone posts another who is tall, lythe with a dancer's ass, others will complain that she is titless and skinny.
Who is right?
Cheers. G.[/QUOTE]I only care about my own rating. But the photos definitely allow perspective.
-
[QUOTE=Smoothy;2312360]I only care about my own rating. But the photos definitely allow perspective.[/QUOTE]Yep Real photos and clear are worth more than the ratings. Need several guys to rate a girl as top, to get any felling of the possibility she might be good, and I like to see the ratings of certain guys who taste is very similar to my own. Pics are more of a means of ruling girls out, for me, rather than anything that positive.
Fake pics only lead to disappointment.
So I know Smoothy taste is not that similar to mine. However at Least I know Smoothy likes raunchy, I like slim and pretty, less raunchy. I don't take other guys recommended girls in general. Never got a girl to keep repeating from a recommendation at all, that I can recall. We just have to know when our personal taste is different. Had to find all my girls for myself.
I find venue recommendations more useful, as a place to check out and see if anyone appeals.
-
[QUOTE=Goferring;2312357]I'd agree with your comment on different ratings. However, this makes the inclusion of photos as justification all the more pointless.
If someone shows his #10 who is statuesque, buxom and curvaceous, some will likely complain that she is too big.
If someone posts another who is tall, lythe with a dancer's ass, others will complain that she is titless and skinny.
Who is right?
Cheers. G.[/QUOTE]Agree. On top of which, since when do photos tell us which girls we would fuck or not given the opportunity unless the photos show extreme conditions we are certain are not for us? The vast majority in the middle can go either way depending on the circumstances.
"does not look like the photos" might be the most oft repeated refrain on these forums where public photos are accessible.
Photos can mislead as easily if not more easily as to inform. I am sure every one of us could post photos of girls where the angle, the lighting, the year taken and so on would for all the world look like a solid 8 or 9 where in person even the guy proudly posting the photo would probably take a pass on fucking her for free.
And by the same token, I'll bet we have all shown a photo of a girl to a friend that elicted near outright laughter but when that same asshole critic meets the girl in person he suddenly turns unto a stalker trying to get any information about her he can in order to contact her when you are not around.
95% of the time the only thing that matters is how the girl looks and comes across in person. Possibly, full body video clips taken in a very well lit setting yesterday might be more helpul. But even that won't be the way she will come across in person.
-
[QUOTE=MongerForSex;2312034] The same happens to Brazil, dudes always talk about Rio in the past, they alway say girls were more attractive. Nothing changed in Brazil when it comes to attraction but only those dudes changed. When you start mongering for the first time, you will always think about when you mongered for the first time because you was young and start having sex with girls or because you were married for a long time and just started enjoying your life because you never experienced it.[/QUOTE]Speaking generally you're probably right, but as far as I'm concerned I'm 100% sure that the quality of girls (by their look) in Pattaya for example has declined a lot.
My first trip there was in 1997 and I don't even remember seeing a lot of stunners, but there was a lot of slim girls looking quite cute. Then I had a long break when I couldn't go back there from 2000 until 2009. From 2009 to 2012 I could still spot many cuties in many places of the town, from 2012 until 2015 most of the girls were of very bad quality while prices went up dramatically. It's not only the way that we see them that changed, but also the place attracts a lot more girls that are not good looking at all while the cute ones are being outnumbered by far.
-
[QUOTE=Smoothy;2312162]I liked Tanamur better than Stadium, but both rocked. No other discos anywhere in Asia compare to those two. I think Tanamur was voted best night spot in Asia for over 10 years in a row.[/QUOTE]They were in a league of their own. Never seen people partying harder than in discos in Indo back in the day. Truly amazing. The world is far more conservative than it was 20 years ago. I think late Boomers and early Gen X'rs are the most libertine folks on the planet. The Mils are very uptight with so many different things. Their attitudes about gender and sex have spayed and neutered them.
-
[QUOTE=Smoothy;2312352]Naw, I'm not saying anything about Berry. I am saying you claiming that you do get GFE is meaningless as far as I can see because you aren't posting photos. Anyone can get GFE from a girl who most guys consider to be less desirable. I don't consider that something to be intriguing. If you claim the chicks are decent or even hot, that may be your view of reality, but it may or may not be reality for the rest of us.[/QUOTE]Why would anyone go out looking for a chick that is going to be desirable to Smoothy? By that same token what Berry is saying is also meaningless because we do not know if the chicks he claimed he used to get GFE from were hotties because he posted no pictures. Maybe those chicks were dogs, and fast forward to today, not even the dogs will touch him with a 10 foot pole, so now he complains.
-
[QUOTE=Goatscrot;2312428]They were in a league of their own. Never seen people partying harder than in discos in Indo back in the day. Truly amazing. The world is far more conservative than it was 20 years ago. I think late Boomers and early Gen X'rs are the most libertine folks on the planet. The Mils are very uptight with so many different things. Their attitudes about gender and sex have spayed and neutered them.[/QUOTE]The millenials in developing countries have not been spayed and neutered by these concepts spread around in Anglophone university sphere.
-
[QUOTE=Goatscrot;2312149]Could not agree more. The decline has been fast and steep. Last 5 years has seen venues disappear and attitudes change. Can't think of a single place in Asia that is as good or better than it was 20 years ago, for all the reasons you stated in your last sentence. Stadium was just unreal. Also the old Martini's and Sharky's in Nom Penh. Good times they were.[/QUOTE]You should have been in Russia in the 90's. Insane. The Hungry Duck. Ror those who were ever there, nothing in this world will ever compare.
-
[QUOTE=Catire;2312458]The millenials in developing countries have not been spayed and neutered by these concepts spread around in Anglophone university sphere.[/QUOTE]Less so, but it is happening in developing countries as well. And that trend will continue.