It is not the critics who count
You missed the entire point of my post. Women do not need to be prostitutes to feed their children. If you wish to debate this issue with me then address the fact that it is estimated only 20% of women are prostitutes in the Dominican Republic, but 80% of the children in the Dominican Republic are not starving. Do any of you care to share your knowledge on this issue? Do you have any to share? Here is my knowledge on the issue: I've taken my #2 to the store and she has spent 5,500 pesos on just food (acknowledging that it takes a village of critics to raise a child) for herself, two children, her sister and her child (to share) and the Aunt who lives with her. She has told me the food would last a month. Three adults and three children: 916.67 (rounded to the second digit) per human being.
Pick any reasonable number you wish. I'll stipulate to it. Then put your money where your mouth is and hand it to me. I will take the money you hand to me and I will give it to a regular woman and ask her if she can feed her kid with it for a month. I bet she will be able too. In reality, the individual that has made the challenge in my user blog is not using his pesos in Dominican Republic to directly buy food for a child or children. That individual is just talking about it. I am and I have. When I was at the store with my #2 the money came out of my pocket. I loaded the food into my rather large "gas guzzling" vehicle that uses diesel fuel. I drove from the store that was further than two blocks from my house. And all of this required that I leave my apartment. But when I don't you can be certain I'm enjoying my ocean view with or without company.
I'm kicking street knowledge straight in your eyeholes motherfuckers. Open them up! My point remains that prostitutes make a choice. A choice the majority of women on this island do not make. If the parties involved feel like they are doing social work instead of doing business when they are together. I'm fine with that. But don't tell me they need to do it for their children.
Just saying!
Percentage of women who are prostitutes in the DR
There are a lot of prostitutes in the DR. You say it is estimated that 20% of women there are prostitutes. Where does that figure come from? I think it's way way way too high. 1 in 5 women are not prostitutes.
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;1890283]You missed the entire point of my post. Women do not need to be prostitutes to feed their children. If you wish to debate this issue with me then address the fact that it is estimated only 20% of women are prostitutes in the Dominican Republic, but 80% of the children in the Dominican Republic are not starving. Do any of you care to share your knowledge on this issue? Do you have any to share? Here is my knowledge on the issue: I've taken my #2 to the store and she has spent 5,500 pesos on just food (acknowledging that it takes a village of critics to raise a child) for herself, two children, her sister and her child (to share) and the Aunt who lives with her. She has told me the food would last a month. Three adults and three children: 916.67 (rounded to the second digit) per human being.
Pick any reasonable number you wish. I'll stipulate to it. Then put your money where your mouth is and hand it to me. I will take the money you hand to me and I will give it to a regular woman and ask her if she can feed her kid with it for a month. I bet she will be able too. In reality, the individual that has made the challenge in my user blog is not using his pesos in Dominican Republic to directly buy food for a child or children. That individual is just talking about it. I am and I have. When I was at the store with my #2 the money came out of my pocket. I loaded the food into my rather large "gas guzzling" vehicle that uses diesel fuel. I drove from the store that was further than two blocks from my house. And all of this required that I leave my apartment. But when I don't you can be certain I'm enjoying my ocean view with or without company.
I'm kicking street knowledge straight in your eyeholes motherfuckers. Open them up! My point remains that prostitutes make a choice. A choice the majority of women on this island do not make. If the parties involved feel like they are doing social work instead of doing business when they are together. I'm fine with that. But don't tell me they need to do it for their children.
Just saying![/QUOTE]
How many Prostitutes are in the Dominican Republic? Who knows?
[QUOTE=JJ341;1890670]There are a lot of prostitutes in the DR. You say it is estimated that 20% of women there are prostitutes. Where does that figure come from? I think it's way way way too high. 1 in 5 women are not prostitutes.[/QUOTE]Mr. JJ341,
You may be right!
Here are the numbers I was able to source from my internet research. Percentage of Population that are women: 49.8. Using this number to estimate the number of women in Sosua: 24,682. Number of women in Sosua working as prostitutes: 1000. Percentage of women working as prostitutes in Sosua: 4%. It is impossible to project even this number into the general female population of the island. But as a amateur sociologist, I can make the following statement with complete confidence: "Mr. E's posts in the General Information section present anecdotal evidence that females under report themselves as prostitutes". ROTFLMAO!
Could you let Frannie know that the lower we push the estimated number of prostitutes in the Dominican Republic, the stronger my argument becomes that a woman does not need to be a prostitute to feed her children? He can pick any number he likes when it comes to the cost of raising a child. Because if poverty was the sole reason women enter prostitution in the Dominican Republic we would expect that number to be around 35 - 40%. That would be in line with the percentage of women living in poverty in the Dominican Republic. Or we could take the female rate of unemployment in the Dominican Republic: 23.4%. Trying to make the argument based purely on economics shows that someone is out of touch. Others have outlined qualitative factors unrelated children's economic well being that have lead women into or keep women in prostitution. Mr. GoGo has indicated that I am the one out of touch. I'll leave it to the reader to figure it out.
Sources:
[URL]http://countrymeters.info/en/Dominican_Republic[/URL]
[URL]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...nican_Republic[/URL]
[URL]http://www.dominicantoday.com/dr/loc...Sosuas-tourism[/URL]
[URL]http://data.worldbank.org/country/dominican-republic[/URL]
[URL]https://www.quandl.com/collections/dominican-republic/dominican-republic-unemployment[/URL]
You just won't give it up now will you?
In my user blog, I've already provided three examples of women living in the DR without being prostitutes. Two of my examples have children. Now you have provided the fourth. All of the examples provided between the two of us are anecdotal and therefore cannot be projected through any population of women living here (single mothers, uneducated, unskilled or otherwise). Do you have some academic research to show me that indicates a woman needs to be a prostitute to feed her children or survive in the Dominican Republic? No, you don't. Because if you did you would have quoted it by now.
My point is and will remain that a woman does not need to be a prostitute to feed her children or survive in the Dominican Republic.
[QUOTE=Frannie;1891548]Here is an example. I know a pleasant young Haitian woman (attractive). She lives with her family in Montellano. She is a legal resident of the DR. She is married, but her husband is in Haiti. She is not a hooker. She got 5000 pesos from me every 2 weeks, plus transportation fare, plus free meals on the job. She now has a new job working 6 days a week in a clothing store in Sosua as a sales assistant. After she pays 100 pesos a day for transportation to and from Montellano plus pays for her daily lunches she has 1500 pesos per two weeks left over for herself (and to feed a child, but she doesn't have a child) or to give to her mother.[/QUOTE]
Things only us big bosses can understand
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;1891602]My point is and will remain that a woman does not need to be a prostitute to feed her children or survive in the Dominican Republic.[/QUOTE]Agreed. She just needs to find herself a big boss sexpat, preferably one with an SUV that can ford streams and rivers, to pay her a monthly stipend and for her medical school registration, in exchange for sexual favors and janitorial service on an ocean view apartment that may or may not leak during rain. Because this sugar baby / sugar daddy relationship is definitely NOT prostitution.
You don't know what you are doing?
Of course I do!
[QUOTE=Parkinsons;1891872]Because this sugar baby / sugar daddy relationship is definitely NOT prostitution.[/QUOTE]Mr. Parkinsons, Let me kick a little knowledge into your eye holes.
Prostitution: the business or practice of engaging in sexual relations in exchange for payment or some other benefit.
Sugar Baby: A female or male who is financially pampered / cared for by a sugar daddy or sugar mama in exchange for companionship (I. E. Sexual favors).
Here is some additional information for you:
"In light of recent events, we thought it might be time for a refresher course in the definitions of Sugar. Many are quick to label the Sugar lifestyle choice as prostitution, but there are many differences between this lifestyle and the oldest profession. High-end or not, a call girl is not an interchangeable word for a Sugar Baby. Here are four reasons why.
1. A Relationship vs A Transaction.
A prostitute and a client have a transaction relationship. They meet, exchange funds, and participate in some sort of physical act and part ways. Typically, this is a one time occurrence. A job. There is no relationship, and no possibility for a relationship. And that is the key difference really: Relationship. Sugar Babies and Sugar Daddies have on-going relationships, not transactions. More often than not, a Sugar relationship will resemble that of a girlfriend-boyfriend relationship. There are real connections and real possibilities at romance, something that is not in the realm of possibility with an escort or prostitute. Just because a relationship doesn't follow the traditional rules of courtship, doesn't mean it isn't valid. It also doesn't mean it's illegal.
2. Being a Sugar Baby vs being a Prostitute.
Sugar is a lifestyle choice, not a profession. A sugar baby is a woman who wants to date financially secure men who can provide her with the lifestyle she desires. She's selective about who she dates; a prostitute isn't picky about who she takes on as a client. The risks involved with prostitution are countless, and include exposure to crime, abuse, sexually transmitted diseases and theft of service. Many prostitutes are also subject to physical and emotional abuse, especially when involved with a pimp. And in Sugar, sex is never a requirement, only an aspiration.
3. Dating a Sugar Baby vs ordering a prostitute.
A Sugar Daddy is generous, and wants to see their partner succeed. When two people are involved in a mutually beneficial relationship, they respect and value one another's time. Sugar relationships can turn into long term serious relationships. Prostitutes are paid to perform a service, while Sugar Babies sometimes receive funds as an added benefit of dating a generous man. A john doesn't want a hooker to stick around, and a Sugar Daddy doesn't want his Sugar Baby to leave. While an escort might have a sordid sexual history, a Sugar relationship is often monogamous.
4. Quality vs Quantity.
Most Sugar Babies aren't solely involved in the sugar world. Sugar Babies are also teachers, college students, actresses, and business professionals. They seek successful mentors that can advance their career, not a temporary fix. Sugar Babies can be present in the lives of Sugar Daddies because they have long-term professional goals, and interesting personalities to keep everyone intrigued. Prostitutes on the other hand, use their trade as a source of income it's a last resort for many women who are pressed for money. They aren't looking for mentors or anyone with a specific level of expertise. You may meet hundreds of prostitutes before finding anyone to fulfill your emotional needs. Prostitutes are hired to role play for the evening they'll be whomever you want them to be, but they won't necessarily be themselves. She treats you like a job, not like a man".
Source: [URL]http://blog.seekingarrangement.com/2014/07/14/four-differences-between-sugar-prostitution/[/URL].
Now, If you have read what I have written before then you know I don't agree. In case you haven't seen my previous work:
[QUOTE=SubCmdr;1885441]You pretty much hit this nail right on the head. To say it's something else is simply self-rationalization. We know the ability of individuals to self rationalize is infinite. I think you are dealing with the difference of what society approves as opposed as what is legal. Anecdotal evidence has been presented on this board that prostitution is legal in the Dominican Republic but it is not approved. And it's unlikely to ever be approved outside of the circles that engage in it.
Chicks exchange sex for money, goods and services all the time for a ST, TLN, week, month, year, or lifetime. Societal approval is provided for the length of time and type of relationship. Prostitution is legally allowed within societies where it tends to facilitate and assist the society. And it is suppressed in societies where it perceived to be disruptive to society.
It is not surprising to me that chicks do not want to admit in engaging in an activity not approved within their society. But you are dead on with your definition.[/QUOTE]What you fail to understand is that this is the thread UTR's, Non-Pros (NP) and Sugar Babies (SB). Read through all of my posts and tell me where I have said the Sugar Baby / Sugar Daddy relationship is not prostitution. My contention has always been that I have found there is a "qualitative difference" between prostitutes working the streets of Sosua and Boca Chica and UTR's, Non-Pros (NP) and Sugar Babies (SB) I have encountered throughout the Dominican Republic.
Now from your previous responses to my posts I see that you like to debate and be critical. Go ahead and do that my man. You can debate what prostitution is until your fingers get tired of hitting the keyboard. I'm not interested in that. If you desire to engage in an intellectual discussion of definition of prostitution, knock yourself the fuck out. I prefer to leave such things as an exercise for the reader. Be a man in the arena! Don't be a critic, because then you don't count.
Let Mr. GoGo levitate. Let Mr. Frannie pontificate. Both can notate, meditate ruminate, debate, orate and evaluate all the different reasons they have to berate. Unfortunately for them it amounts to nothing more than a mental attempt to masturbate, self-fellate and placate. That's what critics do. Why concentrate on the critics as they corroborate to misevaluate? As far as I'm concerned they can fornicate or defecate. It makes no difference to me. I prefer to disseminate knowledge that educates. So that others can imitate and operate in a way that creates a life that is far from boilerplate.
A little word play for you motherfuckers, because things were getting a little too serious up in here. LOL!