Things may have (or be) changing
[QUOTE=BananaBoi;2504270]I was talking to a gogo girl and she was under the impression that anyone can get in to Thailand now but no one wants to sit around for 14 days. She asked why I don't come because I have nothing else to do and 14 day quarantine would be easy for me. I told her it was only for China at the moment and she argued that my country can get in. This girl watches the news constantly so who knows what Thai people are being told on Thai news.[/QUOTE]Banana Boi,
I think things may be quietly changing. I happened on an article which said the list of eligible categories had expanded for the Royal Thai Embassies in UK and US. A quick dig on the London Embassy website and at first glance it looks like no update since August. However, go to the list at [URL]https://london.thaiembassy.org/en/publicservice/119247-requirements-for-certificate-of-entry-during-travel-restriction?page=5d6636cd15e39c3bd00072dd&menu=5f4b6eb3f6ae4b236972c562[/URL] and eligibility for Certificate of Entry now include:
For long-stay visa holder (Non-Immigrant O-A / O-X).
For retirement (Non-Immigrant O).
For Elite Card holders.
For non-Thai who own property in Thailand.
For tourism purpose (single entry tourist visa only).
The single entry tourist visa is a sixty day visa (one 30 day extension permitted). I have also read that the previous requirement of B500 k in a Thai bank is no longer applicable. The UK Embassy just says proof from a UK or Irish bank of sufficient funds to cover the trip.
One small issue for readers in England. You are probably breaking the Lockdown v2 laws by going to the airport between now and early December as "leaving the country" (except for work) is not a permitted reason to leave home.
When I get a bit more time I'll check the Thai Embassy US to see if the criteria are the same. The article said the change happened on 18-Nov, but it seems the Embassy website dates don't update when the pages are updated (the link says August, the page July and the change was recent).
Health Insurance Requirement for O-A Retirement Visa
[QUOTE=GettingFedUp;2504313]I have read of people having difficulty with their existing health insurance (including Covid coverage) not being accepted by embassies.
There is a Thai General Insurance Association portal where the cover is on offer (https://covid19.tgia.org/).[/QUOTE]The Royal Thai Embassy in Washington, D.C. advises those wishing to apply for a O-A retirement visa: "You may use your existing insurance coverage if it meets this requirement." Elsewhere on the same page, the Embassy advises the required health insurance must "cover a minimum of 100,000 USD (or equivalent in other currencies) of medical costs incurred by the applicant in Thailand, including medical costs in the event that the applicant contracts COVID-19" and "the insurance must cover the whole duration of stay in Thailand." [URL]https://thaiembdc.org/2020/11/17/oalongstay/[/URL].
Obviously, everybody's health insurance is different. But I checked my policy for so-called "overseas coverage" and it does cover medical care (including hospitalization) when I am outside the United States. By way of contrast, Medicare generally does *not* cover seniors who require medical care outside the United States. Obviously that's just one data point. And I admit that I have excellent health insurance through and employee group plan.
It doesn't surprise me that some Thai consular officials cast a gimlet eye upon health insurance that wasn't purchased through the government-approved portal. That would require them to interpret the coverage and make a decision on whether it met the COVID coverage rule. Far easier to verify the visa applicant purchased coverage through the portal. And, I might add, far more profitable for the Thai insurance companies.