Repubs target every act of Sex For Pleasure, not just in this hobby
[QUOTE=Tiny12;2863295]Yes, Mike Johnson the new Speaker is just as hostile to our hobby as Kamala Harris and other Democratic Party feminists whose work helped lead to passage of FOSTA and SESTA.
If Democratic representatives had been wise, they would have told Jeffries to pigeon hole Emmer, who supports social liberties more than most Republicans, and to tell him Democrats wouldn't vote in the Speaker election. Emmer would be more inclined to work across the aisle with Democrats. But the bitter partisanship in the House and the Democrats' emphasis on winning the next election instead of doing what's best for America won out. Democrats figure they'll do better in the next election if Johnson's the speaker.[/QUOTE]I have no idea what Repub Bob Portman and other Repubs' FOSTA-SESTA bills have to do with Repubs getting closer than ever today to establishing a nationwide ban on Abortions, outlawing Sex For Pleasure, restricting sex to "for the purpose of procreation only", etc, but I think it is really cute that you have such a rosy, positive, little cupcake view of your beloved Trump Repubs that you actually believe Matt Getzakidpregnant, Marjorie Taylor Greenjewishlazerbeams and any one of dozens of other classic Repubs in the House would not stand up and demand a newly-elected Speaker be thrown out within 10 minutes if by whatever miracle he / she had been elected after getting even 1 Dem vote.
LOL. Really. So cute.
Does the color REALLY matter?
[QUOTE=GDreams;2863168]I don't know, the thought of Don gagging on a big black cock in prison somehow makes me warm and fuzzy.[/QUOTE] Who's to say, it has to be [b]big[/b] and [b]black?[/b]
It could be a big white cock (or a tiny one...kkkk!). Or any color for that matter, yellow, red or purple with polka-dots warts. I hear he like orange?
Even one that has all the gay-pride flag colors on it, for all anyone cares!
[b]PS:[/b] Besides, that bespoke "presidential" section of prison, may not have any BBC to fit the bill (...kkkk), so then what?
Thanks again so much Nutty Nancy
[URL]https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/biden-campaign-johnson-speaker/2023/10/25/id/1139684/[/URL]
MAGA takes the house, we have the Supreme court.
Onto the Senate.
And then our Lord and Savior will evict that illegitimate squatter in the White House, and then all will be well in the Universe.
If Name Calling is your thing...knock yourself out!
Note Tiny 12, first swears and claims, he's not calling me or my moniker, here:
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2862885]Man you guys can be a sensitive and humorless bunch at time. [b][u]I am not[/u] making fun of your moniker.[/b] A Spider Monkey is far more advanced than a Spider. I gave you a promotion of about 350 million years on the evolutionary ladder. ... Spider Monkey is not perjorative, or at least I didnt mean it to be[/QUOTE]
Then note, the "foot-in-mouth", [b]confirmation[/b] and [b]incrimination[/b] here:
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2863168]Stop or [b]I'm going back to [u]calling[/u] you Spider Monkey[/b].[/QUOTE]Thank you for the [u]CONFIRMATION[/u], of the very thing you swore you [b]"were NOT"[/b] doing. Sure enough, if I give you enough rope you'll, just hang yourself (as it were).
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2862885][b]For Spider Monkey[/b]
...
You are welcome by the way to call me something like Massive Throbbing Tiny Penis Head. I'd wear that as a badge of honor. And a touch of sadness as it calls to mind former board member Dickhead, may he RIP.
I have simply been titling my posts with something to do with monkeys to see if you'd follow through with your vow not to participate in monkey discussions. Well now that you've broken your vow at least twice, there's no point in continuing the experiment. So I'll stop.
And youve called me a lot worse, like a clown in your last post. [/QUOTE]
You directly posted [b]"For Spider Monkey"[/b] in the headline of your post, as if to childishly call me out, in some kind of petty angry vendetta. Replying to a post, already comes with the ISG user moniker, embedded into the post. It was CLEARLY seen for what it was...petty and clownish behavior!
Please show me where I directly called you a clown, to your claim?
Yes I've called Republicans (mostly MAGA Repubs) "clowns" (as well as other names), as a collective or group of people and called your behavior clownish. I did not directly single you out and call you a clown, or associate your moniker with the word "clown". There is difference, in what you claim!
Tiny 12, don't flatter yourself! I've been called worse, by some of the [b]"best in class"[/b]. I've had all kinds of clownish, trollish, vile, vitriol, vulgar and venomous crap spewed at me, by the "best in class", be it online (you may know some of THEM here at ISG) and offline. So if you think calling me "Spider Monkey", is in anyway, suppose to bother me or my "sensibilities", just know that I remain [b]steadfast[/b] and [b]unfazed.[/b]
But feel free to step up such clownish behavior and silly name calling towards your fellow ISG brethren, if it makes you feel and sleep better at nights. Just be aware YOU only serve to incriminate and debase yourself. So knock yourself out!
But just know, to really offend me, you've got a lot of tough sledding to do, in order to become, [i]"best in class"[/i] (w/r to those who have come before you, you'll have to get in line) when it comes to such clownish and buffoonery behavior. But, by all means have at it!
Sadly, you're mistaking, what you believe to be "sensitivity", as nothing more than [b]basic concern[/b] for this forum/thread. FWIW, you may need to adjust your internal instrumentation, dials, or radar, when it comes to detecting actual "sensitivity".
My concern is that this forum/thread, NOT descend into or become, YET ANOTHER "Stupid shit in...{fill in the blank} forum", filled with vulgarity, debasement, MF bombs, FU bombs and silly name calling. Ooops!...perhaps I'm already too late?
Anyway, I happen to think, you don't want that either, as "a good steward" of the "American Politics" forum/thread? Or does the thread descend into Repub nihilism?
Is the "QAnon/MAGA mind"...just a bridge too far?
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2863218]Google sarcasm and facetiousness.
Secondly I don't believe a word the pope says about anything.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/16/w...-election.html
If he says ADULT, according to whos definition.
Since GAY men love raping little boys.
ZERO credibility follows. [/QUOTE]
[b]If you cannot say what you mean[/b] then all you're doing is, at best lazily posting misleading and misinformation, at worse you're lying. CLEARLY you wanted to make people think "altar boys" were involved, to foster and bolster your antithetical beliefs.
Sarcasm intact, you could have still made whatever sarcastic bullshit you wanted and demonstrated (or qualified) to your reader, what was report and then mix in the real truth of your sarcasm, [b]ie.[/b][i]"...that while no altar boys, have been implicated so far, I (MDS1) have no doubt there were altar boys, at said sex-party." [/i] That's sarcasm!
You must think, we all somehow live in YOUR "QAnon/MAGA WORLD" where everyone is to think,[i] "Every GAY man loves sexually abusing BOYS"[/i], and is at the center of all conspiracies and the all the world's evil. And illogically by [u]YOUR[/u] very same antithetical logic, your also saying [i]"Every STRAIGHT man loves sexually abusing GIRLS"[/i].
I doubt many us, who don't live in "your QAnon/MAGA WORLD", would even get or understand [u]your woeful attempt at said sarcasm[/u], given the nature of the subject matter, your antithetical beliefs, your crass and cavalier attitude towards the children (in particular BOYS, while conveniently leaving out GIRLS), involved in sexual abuse by the church, is indeed troubling.
You'll forgive me if I don't get, understand or see your [i]"brand of sarcasm"[/i]. Because asking anyone reading your post, to somehow crawl into your "QAnon\MAGA World" and come to the conclusion that your were being sarcastic, is quite frankly, [b][i]"a bridge too far"[/i][/b], IHMO.
Since it's so hard to tell, was it sarcasm, when you said:
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2861436] "...I never heard of any nuns fucking the other altar boys or, [b]I certainly would of been all over it".[/b][/QUOTE]
And also sarcasm when you said:
[QUOTE=MarquisdeSade1;2861511] [b]How many raped the little girls? ZERO,[/b] why? You might ask why is that, because they are fucking GAY.
I went to a Catholic grammar school (and high school and university) there were plenty of girls for them to rape.
Of course not all priests were gay, but if they were GAY they were sure to be raping the little boys, [b]whilst the hetero ones were not raping anyone.[/b][/QUOTE]
Whoa...that's a lot of sarcasm, if true! Is everything you've posted on the church/priest/nuns sexual abuse scandals, [b]just all been sarcasm?[/b] If so, how is anyone to believe anything that comes out your mouth, is anything but sarcasm?
So how about you put that (Trump?) Uni. degree of yours to work [b]and say what you mean?[/b]
And if YOU [u]can't say what you mean[/u], then [b]perhaps you shouldn't say anything at all?[/b]
Stop making it about YOU! . Trump likes the spotlight ALL to himself
[QUOTE=Tiny 12;2863168]The worst form of prejudice is making fun of people with Tiny penises.[/QUOTE]
No, no, no...There you go again, getting it all wrong and twisted!
[b]If I wasn't CLEAR[/b], that was me standing up for the rights of guys with tiny (multi-colored) dicks, that also have the RIGHT to have their tiny dick (if that's the case), also sucked-off by the incarcerated Orange Orangutan/Baboon, in the "presidential jail cell".
It's ONLY fitting, that these under represented tiny dicks, (especially QAnon/MAGA Repubs, who worship their "Loud and Save-ior['dumb ass'] "), also have the right to be considered, in that long line of dicks, waiting to be sucked off by Trump.
[b]"Prejudice"![/b] Not at all, quite the opposite, as a matter of fact. Again you're seeing the glass half-empty.
How is it "prejudice", if I am sincerely, [b]advocating[/b] for tiny dicks, to be equally considered and included in that long line of [i]"suck-off"[/i] hopefuls, looking to be a jailed contestant in the [i]"Orange ex-Presidential Dick Gagging Jail Sweepstakes"?[/i]
Common now! The consideration and inclusion of tiny dicks, was just the right thing to do. All in the name of an fairness, equality and [u]justice for all tiny dicks[/u], everywhere, looking to serve their "Loud and Save-ior['dumb ass'], who we know to be an equal opportunity offender (...kkkk!).
Initial Post:
[QUOTE=GDreams;2863168]I don't know, the thought of Don gagging on a big black cock in prison somehow makes me warm and fuzzy[/QUOTE]
Let's be honest here, shall we! Who amongst us, after reading the initial post (above), didn't perhaps also think, tiny dicks and other multi-colored dicks, were severely under represented, in the that post? Just a wee teeny tiny bit, perhaps?
• BTW, Why are you trying to make this ABOUT YOU???
• And what's with your silly "[b]Tiny[/b] penises" comment, what was that all about?? Is that you wanting to [b]"represent"[/b]??
