Stupid Shit in Kyiv

[Paulie97]

The world has seen the freedom and democracy promoted and implemented by NATO in:

Iraq.

Afghanistan.

Somalia.

Yemen.

Syria.

Serbia.

Libya.

Now we have Ukraine wrecked.

Thanks, but no thanks.

Post 911 War on Terror activity is apples and oranges to the situations in Central and Eastern Europe, where you failed to name a single unhappy former USSR NATO member. This while while you were just expelled from Syria and your guy in Serbia just stepped down. And of course you started the war in Ukraine. Nice try Ivan.

[FreshPrince841]

So many things Russia wants. So many rivers to cross.

Forget the Dnieper. Russia also wants to cross the Elba, Seine and Potomac. Don't you know that Russia's borders don't end anywhere?

Their chances to cross the Dnieper and take Kharkov and Odessa are about the same, though, so save your crocodile tears.

You also wanted to take Kyiv in three days and the whole Ukraine in 72. It's been three years now since you wanted this.

Keep dreaming.

Greetings Xpartan,

Who is " you " that you are referring to in your comments?

I am not Russian, and I am against the war.

[Xpartan]

I say we're way classier than this.

Seriously, a mongering forum has turned into a place where ISG member Questner consistently posts every piece of garbage coming from the leader of RFMS (Russian Failed Mafia State). Anyone remember Giuliani's press conference in front of Four Seasons Landscaping between a sex shop and a crematorium? Can it be that Questner is every bit as confused as Giuliani finding himself in front of that 5-star landscaping company?

[Tumeric1]

Today The President spoke about the settlement of the Ukrainian crisis in an interview with Pavel Zarubin:

. ".

Who is the "customer" here? Who asked for it? Who believes one thing that comes out of putin's constantly lying mouth?

[Paulie97]

"China and India have suspended March purchases of Russian oil as USA Sanctions drive up shipping costs, Reuters reported Tuesday, citing traders and shipping data. ".

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/...reuters-a87774

The US has PLENTY more in it's hip pocket, while there's plenty of leverage against China.

"A significant source of deterrence lies in America's recognition of just how much the Chinese economy relies on supplying USA Companies. China's confidence in using the economic coercion card far outstrips the nature of its true position, and two can play at that game. After all, China's single largest trading balance by far is with the United States, which nearly equals the entirety of the EU and ASEAN balances. China's suppliers receive roughly $3 from the USA For every $1 that its end markets spend on USA Products. ".

https://thehill.com/opinion/4940101-...oercion-power/

And it's all plenty complicated. Anyone that claims it isn't is a clown that isn't worth your attention, no matter which side you fall on with these issues.

[Paulie97]

There's a whole lot more places to go, and deep into the realm of secondary sanctions against countries that aid Russia. The Kremlin faithful of ISG aren't moved though, in spite of Russia's now extremely high inflation and interests rates, all is still rosy. This while they hide their disappointment that Trump has yet to come to their rescue, and in fact thus far the opposite has occurred.

"China may have increased its trading ties with Russia since the start of the war in Ukraine, but sanctions have forced many Chinese financial institutions to scale back economic ties with Moscow for fear of secondary sanctions.

Russia is likely to continue trying to circumvent oil sanctions but how China responds to the threat of facing secondary sanctions could undermine this.

Meanwhile, following the latest sanctions, Chinese and Indian refiners are looking to other suppliers of crude away from Russia, according to Reuters on Monday, citing energy traders. ".

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-shad...-coast-2013815

[Questner]

Today The President spoke about the settlement of the Ukrainian crisis in an interview with Pavel Zarubin:

An excerpt from Vladimir Putin's interview with VGTRK journalist Pavel Zarubin about the prospects for settling the Ukrainian crisis. Under what conditions are negotiations possible? Can the illegitimate Zelensky sign anything? And what result do they all ultimately want?

P. Zarubin: "A few days ago I managed to ask you a question about the prospects for a Ukrainian settlement. And you said something very important then, which had a big resonance, everyone is discussing it now, that since there is a decree by Zelensky banning negotiations with Russia, then if we imagine that such negotiations are underway, have begun, then they will be illegitimate, and their results can be called illegal at any moment. This caused a big resonance, the next day Zelensky was already making excuses, he said that he did not ban negotiations for everyone, he allegedly left this opportunity for himself, and he said that he adopted this decree in conditions when Russian troops were stationed near Kiev. He explained this by the fact that it was supposedly necessary to fight separatism, it was necessary to preventively fight possible shadow negotiations along various lines and channels with Russia. And so he ended his speech by saying that "I am the leader of the negotiations, and I have banned the rest of the negotiations. " How do you like this reaction?

V. Putin: "Our negotiations began immediately after the start of the NWO. Initially, we told the Ukrainian leadership at that time that the people in the LPR and DPR did not want to be part of Ukraine, get out of there and that's it, that's the end of it. There are no military actions, there is no war, we will not fight. That was back in late February 2022, then contact meetings began in Belarus, then we moved to Istanbul. What happened there? Somewhere around the end of March, we received a paper from Kyiv, by the way, with the signature of the head of the Ukrainian negotiating group, Mr. Arakhamia. And it was these Ukrainian proposals, I want to emphasize this, this is very important, that formed the basis of the draft peace treaty developed in Istanbul. And this took place on April 15. But before that, some European leaders told me on the phone that it was impossible for Ukraine to sign a peace treaty, as one of my colleagues put it. I already said it, I think I even called it with a gun to my temple. Yes, good. And what needs to be done? It is necessary to withdraw troops from Kyiv. It was clear to us in principle that deception was entirely possible. For decades, Russia was deceived, they said one thing and did something completely different. Nevertheless, based on considerations of preventing bloodshed, some serious war, we nevertheless agreed to this. And at the end of March, we began to withdraw troops from Kyiv in two directions, in two columns. On April 4, the withdrawal was completed. Some of the troops left through Belarus, and some directly to the territory of the Russian Federation. On April 4, the withdrawal was completed. And the paper that we agreed on in Istanbul was drawn up on April 15, when there were no longer any Russian troops near Kyiv. And practically on the same day, although there were things in it that were controversial, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs pointed this out, and a number of our other government agencies, nevertheless, I agreed that we were ready to implement this document. And right on the evening of the 15th or the 16th, we transmitted to Kyiv that we agreed to finalize this, well, to sign this document. There was practically nothing left to process, there was only one point that the Ukrainian side proposed to consider and put an end to at a personal meeting of the two presidents. I agreed with this, but suddenly information came from Kyiv that they needed to consult with their allies and they were taking a week's break. Well, they consulted, as is known, Mr. Johnson, then the Prime Minister of Great Britain, arrived, probably at the instigation of the former American administration headed by Mr. Biden, and persuaded the Ukrainians to continue the war. And, in fact, no one is hiding this, and the Ukrainian officials themselves, and quite high-ranking ones, later said this publicly. And the British leadership does not hide this, they also speak about it openly. They refused this agreement and decided to continue the war. But, frankly speaking, we immediately received a signal from Kyiv, as we were told then, now we will fight to the last Ukrainian. So for now, either we fight you, or you fight us, in general. They did not decide to sign the agreement. But, I repeat once again, on April 4, 2022, there were no longer Russian troops near Kiev, and the agreements were finally agreed upon on April 15, and the decree banning negotiations was signed at the end of September and entered into force on October 4, that is, six months after the draft peace agreement was agreed upon. Therefore, to say that the ban on negotiations was introduced when Russian troops left Kiev is, well, completely incorrect, and, as it were, on such serious issues as trying to mislead your society, the world community, well, at the very least, incorrect. But this simply once again emphasizes who we are dealing with. If Zelensky says that you can negotiate with him, well, makes it clear that you can negotiate with him, in your opinion? You can negotiate with anyone, but due to his illegitimacy, he does not have the right to sign anything. But if he wants to take part in the negotiations, I will appoint people who will conduct these negotiations, please. The question is about the final signing of the documents. This is a very serious issue that should guarantee the security of both Ukraine, by the way, and Russia for a serious, long-term historical perspective. And there can be no blunders, no rough edges, everything must be honed in accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine, the President of Ukraine in conditions, even in conditions of martial law, does not have the right to extend his powers. Only representative bodies of power, only the Rada, that is, the country's parliament, have the right to extend their powers. And the president has only a five-year term, that's all, nothing more. Then his powers are transferred to a representative of the Rada. But if there is a desire to negotiate and find compromise solutions, let anyone conduct these negotiations there, we will, naturally, achieve what suits us, what corresponds to our interests. But in the case of signing documents, here, of course, everything must be so that lawyers confirm to us the legitimacy of those people who will be authorized by the Ukrainian state to sign these agreements. "But if he wants to take part in the negotiations, I will appoint people who will conduct these negotiations, please. The issue is the final signing of the documents. This is a very serious issue that should guarantee the security of both Ukraine, by the way, and Russia for a serious, long-term historical perspective. And there cannot be a single mistake, not a single rough spot, everything must be honed in accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine, the President of Ukraine in conditions, even in conditions of martial law, does not have the right to extend his powers. Only representative bodies of power have the right to extend their powers, only the Rada, that is, the country's parliament. And the president has only a five-year term, that's all, nothing more. Then his powers are transferred to the representative of the Rada. But if there is a desire to conduct negotiations and find compromise solutions, let anyone conduct these negotiations there, we will, naturally, achieve what suits us, what corresponds to our interests. But in the case of signing documents, here, of course, everything must be such that lawyers confirm to us the legitimacy of those people who will be authorized by the Ukrainian state to sign these agreements. "But if he wants to take part in the negotiations, I will appoint people who will conduct these negotiations, please. The issue is the final signing of the documents. This is a very serious issue that should guarantee the security of both Ukraine, by the way, and Russia for a serious, long-term historical perspective. And there cannot be a single mistake, not a single rough spot, everything must be honed in accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine, the President of Ukraine in conditions, even in conditions of martial law, does not have the right to extend his powers. Only representative bodies of power have the right to extend their powers, only the Rada, that is, the country's parliament. And the president has only a five-year term, that's all, nothing more. Then his powers are transferred to the representative of the Rada. But if there is a desire to conduct negotiations and find compromise solutions, let anyone conduct these negotiations there, we will naturally achieve what suits us, what corresponds to our interests. But in the case of signing documents, here, of course, everything must be such that lawyers confirm to us the legitimacy of those people who will be authorized by the Ukrainian state to sign these agreements. ".

P. Zarubin: "And they should cancel the decree banning negotiations, right?

V. Putin: "Well, yes, if we start negotiations now, they will be illegitimate. There is, however, I haven't spoken about this, but I will say, there is, however, a problem. Why? Because when the current head of the regime, that's the only way to call him today, signed this decree, he was a relatively legitimate president, but now he can't cancel it because he is illegitimate. That's the trick, the catch, you see, the trap. But, in principle, by and large, if they want to do this, there is a legal way. Please, let the Rada representatives do this in accordance with the Constitution. If there is a desire, any legal issue can be closed. Well, so far we simply don't see such a desire. Well, I think that his Western sponsors cannot exist, they won't last a month if the money and, broadly speaking, the bullets stop. That's it, it will all be over in a month or a month and a half or two. In this sense, Ukraine's sovereignty is almost zero. If their Western sponsors want to achieve peace, well, the path is very simple. I once sent a corresponding signal about this. If there is a desire, that's it, please. And then they will quickly find all legal ways to close legal issues, including canceling this decree banning negotiations. ".

[Xpartan]

I still think that Russia will want more than the four regions they declared, I think they will cross the Dniper river and continue invading kherson all the way to Odessa as Odessa is the crown jewel for them. I think they may have plans to divide Ukraine and plus they are also seizing more land in Kharkov which is not in the declared four regions and they are also close to Dnipropetrovsk. I lived in Odessa for some time and so sad to see this beautiful city and country be destroyed like this.

So many things Russia wants. So many rivers to cross.

Forget the Dnieper. Russia also wants to cross the Elba, Seine and Potomac. Don't you know that Russia's borders don't end anywhere?

Their chances to cross the Dnieper and take Kharkov and Odessa are about the same, though, so save your crocodile tears.

You also wanted to take Kyiv in three days and the whole Ukraine in 72. It's been three years now since you wanted this.

Keep dreaming.

[Sirioja]

North Koreans who helped weak Russia are leaving first line after too many deaths, when so courageous Ukrainians are able to resist with their balls to big Russia which need North Korea help.

[Sirioja]

This is interesting and I think there is common ground here that may be acceptable to Russia, although not completely.

Putin has already said that the basic requirement to end the war with Ukraine are:

1. Recognition that Crimea + the 4 new territories (entirely) are Russian.

2. Neutrality for Ukraine and never joining NATO.

If those 2 conditions are accepted, there can be a pathway to peace. Point 2 is addressed in what you posted, OK. But what about point 1 in full, that is not clear. Let's see. I think if what you posted is accurate, the Russians will look very closely at it. Overall, that plan looks a bit realistic at least.

I love the country Russia, but Putin stole Crimea to Ukraine which is fully right to resist and decide what they want, not what crazy shameful Putin ask. World don t have to listen to dictator Putin, same like world don t have to accept what senile Trump want. Big support to Ukraine, Greenland / Denmark, Canada and Panama.

[Elvis 2008]

This is interesting and I think there is common ground here that may be acceptable to Russia, although not completely.

Putin has already said that the basic requirement to end the war with Ukraine are:

1. Recognition that Crimea + the 4 new territories (entirely) are Russian.

2. Neutrality for Ukraine and never joining NATO.

If those 2 conditions are accepted, there can be a pathway to peace. Point 2 is addressed in what you posted, OK. But what about point 1 in full, that is not clear. Let's see. I think if what you posted is accurate, the Russians will look very closely at it. Overall, that plan looks a bit realistic at least.

BR, you and Questner are voices of sanity. Tucker Carlson said yesterday that Secretary of State Blinken under Biden was trying to assassinate Putin. Now you may find that hard to believe or not, but Blinken is the asshole who rounded up the intelligence experts to lie and say Hunter Biden's laptop was classic Russian disinformation. And this asshole's planned lie was why Biden won in 2020. I do not know what the guy's beef was with Russia, but what we do know is whatever shit Hunter Biden was doing in Ukraine, he has been pardoned for. So the Democrats were doing some sleazy shit in Ukraine, and I hope it comes out.

What is so sad is that I think our "intelligence" agencies, which just lied their asses off, are a bigger threat to our democracy than Putin is. I would be shocked if Trump did not think that. Tucker Carlson had a reporter on looking into Trump's assassin. Keep in mind when the FBI went after the innocent Richard Jewel, they had him pictured like a freak within 48 hours. With this assassin, the FBI is not giving up anything, and it is really weird.

So I think given the common enemy, the Democrats and the "intelligence" agencies, that Trump and Putin will get this peace deal done and shove it in their face. I do not see anything Putin wants as unreasonable, but I do think Putin's concern is what to do if the lying Democratic douches return to power in 2028. To me, that is going to be the sticking point, and I am not sure Trump is going to be able to help that much with that issue.

[Xpartan]

Why does no one see it?

He's only interested in peace that would satisfy Putin.

Which is a CAPITULATION.

All his threats and saber rattling is a performance, nothing more.

Tariffs? Russia is an impoverished, third-world country that isn't selling anything to the US. Threatening Russia with tariffs is as sensible as threatening Gabon.

I wonder why no one, including most Ukrainians, can't see Trump for what he really is. Putin's puppet.

Putin's doing the only thing he knows how -- bluffing. His economy is circling the drain, no matter what propacondoms and useful idiots would have you believe. He know that no matter how obedient his people are, they will revolt when there's nothing to eat.

Some Putin's economic woes have nothing to do with the war. The agricultural crisis, considering that he's now stealing crops from several regions of Ukraine, is entirely on the idiotic policies of his cabinet. But for the most parts, Russia simply can't wage this war indefinitely, and he knows this. If there were a real president in the White House, a fair peace could be achieved.

Unfortunately, we don't have a real president, we have a bullshiter-in-chief.

Ukraine must be prepared to keep fighting. There are zero chances for a just peace with Trump in power.

[Xpartan]

I'm hardly surprised that you fail to mention any concerns about the reliability of these polls, in a country at war where dissent is treated very harshly. If you could just come around and admit that Alexi Navalny died of natural causes, you'd get the t-shirt. Wink.

Pollster: Is Vladimir Putin a great leader or the greatest leader ever?

Russian citizen: Hmm.

Pollster: Allow me to repeat: Is Vladimir Putin, the Supreme Commander of the Russian Armed Forces a great leader or the greatest ever?

Russian citizen: I don't know, I'm just, you know- Undecided.

Pollster: Thank you, next question -- what's your take on the Criminal Code Article 20.3. 3: Discrediting of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation?

Russian citizen: Ahh- greatest?

Pollster: Thank you for your cooperation.

[Xpartan]

The one thing I will agree with you is that Russians and Ukrainians are indeed Brothers and it's such a tragedy that this NATO expansion bullshit pushed them to fight each other. I hope there will be a reconciliation after the war is over when the people of Ukraine will realize that the collective west took them down the primrose path and really doesn't give 2 shits about them. That in my opinion is inevitable.

So your so-called soldiers who are robbing, raping and killing Ukrainian civilians are robbing, raping and killing their own family?

Well, sounds like what Russians have been doing like forever.

Nothing new here.

[FreshPrince841]

This is interesting and I think there is common ground here that may be acceptable to Russia, although not completely.

Putin has already said that the basic requirement to end the war with Ukraine are:

1. Recognition that Crimea + the 4 new territories (entirely) are Russian.

2. Neutrality for Ukraine and never joining NATO.

If those 2 conditions are accepted, there can be a pathway to peace. Point 2 is addressed in what you posted, OK. But what about point 1 in full, that is not clear. Let's see. I think if what you posted is accurate, the Russians will look very closely at it. Overall, that plan looks a bit realistic at least.

I still think that Russia will want more than the four regions they declared, I think they will cross the Dniper river and continue invading kherson all the way to Odessa as Odessa is the crown jewel for them. I think they may have plans to divide Ukraine and plus they are also seizing more land in Kharkov which is not in the declared four regions and they are also close to Dnipropetrovsk. I lived in Odessa for some time and so sad to see this beautiful city and country be destroyed like this.