Thread: American Politics
+
Add Report
Results 196 to 210 of 22244
-
09-26-26 13:54 #22049Regular Member

Posts: 1375Israel belongs to the Israeli people, we all saw on 9/11 and 7th October how children and toddlers were murdered by terrorists. We see how Jewish, atheists and Christians are being brutally murdered by terrorists way too often in Europe.
Originally Posted by AssAddict
[View Original Post]
I'm not religious but if I was I would have thanked God every day for sending King Bibi to earth to lead Israel and IDF in the war against terrorism to keep the world safe.
-
09-26-26 13:49 #22048Regular Member

Posts: 1375The Iranian terrorists are not supported by Trump voters, democrats seem to prefer the Iranian regime over President Trump.
Originally Posted by DwayneJohnson
[View Original Post]
It's sad to see how people are affected by the President Trump Derangement Syndrome.
-
09-26-26 12:52 #22047Senior Member

Posts: 7748Neither party is mine. That is why The Cmdr is attacked from both sides.
It is funny how the hate comes at me from both Democrats and Republican. It is just more proof in my mind that individuals who are part of political parties cannot think for themselves. There is no room for independent thought. Only the party platform matters. Repeat it. Attack anyone who does not agree with it.
Neither Party is Mine!
Exactly how is the generation of energy political beyond zoning and permission from the government? All my fellow citizens need electricity.
Crypto should not be a issue that divides along party lines.
-
09-26-26 08:39 #22046Senior Member

Posts: 7971Uh
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
Since the only part of that attributable to Democrats was the "economy's recent strength" part leading into 2025 and none of the deficit skyrocketing large Trump / Repub tax cuts for the wealthy or Trump's Netanyahu Payback War in Iran, the blame falls squarely on the shoulders of every American who was eligible to register and vote for Dem Clinton and all the other Dems on the ballot in 2016 and Dem Harris and all the other Dems on the ballot in 2024 but didn't do that. And if we are only counting the players on the field, one could reasonably specifically attribute everything that happened over the past 20 months to about 114,800 angry Muslims spread across MI, PA and WI.The economys recent strength has also come on the back of a flood of government deficit spending, driven in part by large tax cuts under the first and second Trump administrations, with Iran war spending piling on.
-
09-26-26 08:19 #22045Senior Member

Posts: 7971How much more will that bitcoin cheeseburger cost?
And what is the final cost of a cheeseburger paid for with that bitcoin vs a less than $10 USD cash or bank transfer purchase?
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
Do they give you change back for the 100,000,000 Stats?
-
09-26-26 07:30 #22044Senior Member

Posts: 7748If there is no loyal opposition why I am paying them?
The party in the minority is not powerless. Giving the Democrats no excuses. It retains significant negative power to block, delay, or shape legislation.
Originally Posted by Spidy
[View Original Post]
Like they did for the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025.
Other sources of power include:
Procedural Veto Points: In the USA Senate, the filibuster allows the minority to block legislation requiring 60 votes, whereas the House has fewer such formal barriers.
Amendment and Oversight: Minorities can force votes on amendments to expose majority weaknesses, conduct oversight hearings, and use public messaging to hold the majority accountable.
Research indicates that minority influence is strongest when the majority party is constrained (e. G, by supermajority requirements or internal divisions) and the minority is cohesive and motivated to legislate rather than just campaign.
So lack of a codified law on the Loyal opposition the minority party and those that support it does not give them an excuse for not performing their duties. Otherwise why not just back up and go home. Why? Because they want to collect their salaries for doing nothing.
-
09-26-26 06:59 #22043Senior Member

Posts: 7748Neither party is mine so ask either the Democrats or the Republicans
This is not a question to be directed at me. The question needs to be directed at the Republicans posting in this thread. Lest I remind you:
Originally Posted by Spidy
[View Original Post]
Neither Party is mine!
There is no mention of political parties nor a loyal opposition in the United States Constitution.
Originally Posted by Spidy
[View Original Post]
Thank you for the religious reference. But the meaning is lost on me in this political debate.
Originally Posted by Spidy
[View Original Post]
Under the current system the party candidate for POTUS picks his running mate. That means the people do not get a separate vote for vice president. Under the original constitutional system, each member of the Electoral College cast two votes for president, with the candidate receiving the most votes becoming president and the runner-up becoming vice president. To resolve these issues, the Twelfth Amendment was ratified in 1804, requiring electors to cast separate ballots for president and vice president. Since the 1804 election, candidates have run together on a single ticket, with the president and vice president elected as a unified team. Prior to this amendment, there were no distinct vice presidential candidates on the ballot.
That is your opinion. You make fun of my political position all the time. When you write the (neither party is mine) Repubs, done for Americans?" in italics when you should have just written Republicans.
Originally Posted by Spidy
[View Original Post]
Which party in the Dis United States of America does that?
Originally Posted by Spidy
[View Original Post]
I hope it is clear enough for you if you read The Constitution of the United States of America (the founding document of the country you live in) was formed as a constitutional federal democratic republic. The Dis United States of America is actually a plutocracy.
Originally Posted by Spidy
[View Original Post]
-
09-26-26 03:48 #22042Senior Member

Posts: 1468When did you book your flight genius? I am flying GRU to BKK. I had a simple choice: book the cheaper middle eastern route or pay up and fly thru AMS. I chose the Amsterdam route. Sometimes it is smart to think about geopolitics ahead of time. Can you cancel your flight without a penalty? That is another option worth considering next time you make a reservation.
Originally Posted by DwayneJohnson
[View Original Post]
-
09-26-26 02:50 #22041Senior Member

Posts: 4832Yeah, in your fucked up head, China is the model electrostate while they pollute more than anyone in the world and are putting up coal plants like no tomorrow. 3 in 4 of the solar panels you are gushing about are not working and the Chinese solar industry is going bankrupt as it loses money like crazy.
Originally Posted by Spidy
[View Original Post]
In the mean time, USA oil and gas companies are raking it in which bugs the shit out of libtards like you. China making money and winning the AI race is good. American companies earning money is not. LOL. It is no longer a surprise that the modern Democratic party and people like you are more pro-China than pro-USA.
Generally, a large cruise ship up to 1,100 feet in length can carry as much as two million gallons of diesel on board. https://www.cruisehive.com/how-much-...ip-hold/104177
Originally Posted by Spidy
[View Original Post]
One gallon of diesel contains 40.7 killowatts of energy. https://www.convertunits.com/from/gallon+USA +of+diesel+oil / to / kilowatt-hour.
Multiply the two and you get 81.4 billion watts of energy. If you have a 10 day cruise, that is about 8 billion watts of energy per day.
What a bird brain like you does not get is that solar energy generation is based on square footage and how much space do you need to generate 8 billion watts of energy per day?
Per google, to generate 8 billion watts (8 gigawatts) of solar energy daily, you require approximately 17,500 square miles of land area, which is equivalent to about 11.2 million acres. That just happens to be an area that is 1.5 times the size of the state of Maryland.
And you would need battery capacity to store 4 billion watts of power when the sun went down and you are still going to need hundreds of thousands of gallons of diesel in case there is not adequate sun.
Oh yeah, that is the future!
But there is a successful solar boat. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aditya_(boat).
It carries 75 passengers at a time and makes trips that are a whopping one and a half miles at a time.
It does not use fossil fuels! It uses totally "renewable" energy!
And then there is this: Cloudy-day charging via 32 A shore charger adds 21 kWh in 3 hours.
Just like the fact that China is burning coal and polluting like no tomorrow, you climate change nuts think that plugging in your vehicle into a wall socket somehow is not using fossil fuels.
It has been kind of fun to see Europe waking up to how listening to dumb ass climate change nuts like yourself has led them into the mess they are in now. This past summer when Europe was burning up, they had little of those "luxury" AC units, and thousands died of heat stroke.
One huge reason that the Europeans were so blown away by American standards of living with the world cup is because we Republicans tuned out you climate change nuts, and China has done the same thing. You are just too dense to notice.
-
09-25-26 20:34 #22040Senior Member

Posts: 7748Crypto is different from Bitcoin
Bitcoin is already regulated. So that shows how little you actually know about the subject. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 It is formally tracked in the USA Congress as H.R. 3633 during the 119th Congress. It doesn't addressed Bitcoin in several ways.
Statutory commodity classification: Bitcoin is explicitly classified as a digital commodity under CFTC jurisdiction, locking in what is currently just agency policy into federal law.
CFTC spot-market jurisdiction: The CFTC would gain exclusive regulatory authority over spot trading in digital commodities, including Bitcoin.
Banking access (Section 401): Banks, credit unions, and financial holding companies would be permitted to custody Bitcoin, lend against it as collateral, operate nodes, and provide brokerage / clearing services without extra prior approval.
Developer & self-custody protections (Sections 604605):*Bitcoin developers, node operators, and non-custodial wallet makers get explicit immunity from money-transmitter liability, and self-custody becomes a legally protected right.
Actually they won't and they didn't.
Originally Posted by EihTooms
[View Original Post]
That said, the bill stalled in the Senate the cloture motion was rejected 4950 on September 15,2026, so it has not been enacted. As of now, Bitcoin's commodity status rests on agency practice (reinforced by a March 2026 joint SEC-CFTC classification) rather than statute.
My understanding is that jobs are important to you. From your posting about job creation.
The USA Cryptocurrency industry directly employs 34,000 people and supports a total of 232,000 jobs across the broader economy in 2026. Democrats continue to threaten those jobs.
-
09-25-26 19:45 #22039Senior Member

Posts: 1959'Loyal Opposition' a novel idea, but still a moot point in the US Constitution
Sure it may make a good argument someday, but until constitutional lawyers make that case, who cares since its not a legal constitutional law, rule or duty the minority government has to perform. So once again a moot point!
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
-
09-25-26 19:32 #22038Senior Member

Posts: 1959No such "loyal opposition" in the US Constitution, but does make a good argument?
Yes, thanks for the always enigmatic critique the opposition debtor's way thinking and whom they choose to politically support, instead of focusing on the debate issue at hand. But for the record, I think just fine for myself and support those (people or parties) that foster, a more equalized form of democracy, in all it's forms, in this ever changing world of ours. Hope that's clear enough!
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
That is your cross to bare, my friend!
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
Knowing the U.S. Constitution, as well as you do, wouldn't you have posted evidence to this information by now?
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
Oh, I'm well aware the the meaning with regards to the "loyal opposition", and its intended framing of the term, as explained and defended in my previous post. However, I do take issue with your use of it, taking political license with it, by trying to attribute it, as some kind of article in the U.S. Constitution.
Originally Posted by SubCmdr
[View Original Post]
But since you've not produced any evidence (because there is none) from the U.S. Constitution (a document you know so well), with regards "the loyal opposition", despite the false inferences you maybe trying to make with the British Parliamentary construct of "the loyal opposition", the fact is there is nothing in the The U.S. Constitution.
Currently there is no such thing as the "loyal opposition" in the U.S. Constitution, but it does sound to me like, your "loyal opposition" argument, is the very thing that constitutional law and lawyers are need for and are meant to argue in the courts, as to whether or not it pertains to the constitution.
So the question still remains, "What has the administrative party in power (both houses), the (neither party is mine) Repubs, done for Americans?"
-
09-25-26 17:32 #22037Senior Member

Posts: 82Let's pray the US backed Israel terror regime stops killing children, toddlers, women and civilians across their neighboring countries. We won't hold our breath given their disgusting behaviour since they stole the land of the People of Palestine.
Originally Posted by ShooBree
[View Original Post]
-
09-25-26 17:26 #22036Senior Member

Posts: 82The traitors are in the White House. Paid by foreign agents to send the US terrorist army fight wars they can't fight themselves.
Originally Posted by Canada
[View Original Post]
-
09-25-26 16:29 #22035Senior Member

Posts: 7748Continuing Education about Bitcoin
Bitcoin is not a Ponzi scheme! It lacks the central operator, fraudulent promises of guaranteed returns, and mechanism of using new investors' funds to pay earlier ones that define such schemes.
Originally Posted by EihTooms
[View Original Post]
https://river.com/learn/is-bitcoin-a-ponzi-scheme/
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/crypt...103800184.html
https://www.bitstack-app.com/en/lear...i-scheme?c=EUR
Decentralization: Bitcoin is a protocol for digital money. Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer network with no central authority controlling funds or orchestrating payouts, unlike the centralized fraud inherent in Ponzi schemes.
Transparency: The Bitcoin protocol, including its supply cap and transaction ledger, is open-source and public, whereas Ponzi schemes rely on secrecy and deception.
Value Source: Bitcoin's price is driven by market supply and demand rather than artificial returns; while some critics argue it resembles a "greater fool" game or bubble, it does not meet the legal or structural definition of a Ponzi fraud.
Bitcoin is a opt in system. I do not have a problem with individuals who do not wish to opt in. There are only 21 million Bitcoin that will ever exist in the world. So, more for me. But I will not let mis-information on Bitcoin to unchallenged.

.png)








Reply With Quote


