Rants, Stupid Shit and Coronavirus in Thailand

[SubCmdr]

I see a lot of posts talking about me. But those same people have not stated their position on the issue. Man up! Take a position and answer the question I have posed in the title of this post.

[SubCmdr]

Is group sex among consenting adults older than 18 legal if it involves the exchange of money between the participants?

Crickets?

[SubCmdr]

You mean like when the hooker wanted me to go to the police station with her because she said I owed her money for sex, even though we never had sex? I guess we both should have been locked up on the spot But no, the policeman said if we could not work it out then we would have to go to court on the matter.

It was treated as a civil dispute. Simple as that. It should be noted that you settle the case and did not go to court to stand on your principles. Quite interesting.

ROTFLMAO!

[SubCmdr]

Note the plain language words in the official stated purpose of ISG that are very different from the words you use that fundamentally change its meaning.

My bad. I made an error. On changing the meaning of the purpose of ISG. I didn't realize the pedantic would bum rush me over it.

In the history of ISG, no one has ever produced a legal opinion from a member of the bar in Thailand that said prostitution is legal in Thailand

[EihTooms]

No ET, he only pretends that he's not grasping it. He's provoking you. So please ignore him and let it go. He's not worth it.

But why would I miss out on the fun of provoking him? He certainly speaks for many who get this totally wrong. I would even say most get it totally wrong and some are in the international media. Imo, there are things worth learning in plumbing the depths of the ignorance on this issue. Has there ever been a better candidate for that purpose here?

[SubCmdr]

Good theory. He is either stupid or pretending to be stupid.

Are you a racist or just pretending to be a racist?

If he makes an intellligent reply, please tell me.

All my posts are intelligent (spelled correctly). I am still getting free rent in your head. Thank you! You are like a child that covers his eyes so he doesn't see something then asking his friend if he sees it.

He is on my ignore list.

On your ignore list but still getting free rent in your head. Thank you for continuing to read and enjoy my work.

[SubCmdr]

He is on my ignore list.

Thank you!

This is a excellent idea for everyone who does not like or cannot handle my intelligently composed posts full of reality and truth.

[SubCmdr]

Is anyone else besides EihTooms and SubCmdr still reading this never ending debate about the legitimacy of prostitution in TH?

He did not listen to you then.

So please ignore him and let it go.

What makes you think he is going to listen to you now?

No ET, he only pretends that he's not grasping it.

What exactly am I pretending not to grasp. I completely understand that prostitution is not legal in Thailand.

Also may I remind you that in the entire history of ISG no one has produced a legal opinion from a member of the bar in Thailand that says prostitution is legal in Thailand.

He's not worth it.

What exactly is my value in your opinion?

He's provoking you.

Exactly how does posting a news article where I mention no other posters provoke EihTooms directly? There is no requirement for anyone to read or reply to my posts.

Good theory. He is either stupid or pretending to be stupid.

On what basis are you making this statement about me?

If he makes an intelligent reply, please tell me.

All my replies are intelligent.

He is on my ignore list.

When exactly did that happen?

On September 1, 2026 you responded directly to a post I made about visas. In the RANTS thread within the last week you posed a question to me directly about the legality of prostitution.

[HorseTrader]

No ET, he only pretends that he's not grasping it. He's provoking you. So please ignore him and let it go. He's not worth it.

Good theory. He is either stupid or pretending to be stupid.

If he makes an intellligent reply, please tell me. He is on my ignore list.

[Mogwai]

My god, SubCmdr. You are still not grasping it.

No ET, he only pretends that he's not grasping it. He's provoking you. So please ignore him and let it go. He's not worth it.

[SubCmdr]

I am a simple man too.

If our geopolitical expert who is a war monger and Brazilian pussy colonizer has not been to Thailand for over 6 years, exactly what does he think he can add to any discussion in the Thailand thread? No wonder he is talking about Brazil here.

ROTFLMAO!

[Mr Enternational]

And the part that is not a crime is the part where consenting adults agree to exchange money for sex, sex for money and then engage in that activity, presumably in private in this case since no one was arrested or charged with doing anything "openly and shamelessly in a public place causing a nuisance to the public. ".

Damn. I wish I had posted it first as a clear and unambiguous lesson in plain language of an example of the police not arresting consenting adult prostitutes or their consenting adult customers "for prostitution".

You mean like when the hooker wanted me to go to the police station with her because she said I owed her money for sex, even though we never had sex? I guess we both should have been locked up on the spot But no, the policeman said if we could not work it out then we would have to go to court on the matter.

[SubCmdr]

Undercover officers confirm foreign workers and prostitution offered openly inside the venue

According to the undercover officers, the workers offered sexual services to customers. Furthermore, they also confirmed that prostitution was offered inside the venue. Consequently, investigators prepared a sting operation based on the findings. Next, undercover agents arranged to pay for such services. Specifically, they transferred money to the bar owners account.

https://www.thaiexaminer.com/thai-ne...ongsao-police/

The sting was based on a complaint that the business was employing foreign workers.

That is NOT what the article says. It is what you said. I quote the article.

Were you the one that complained to the police about that?

No!

Why are you asking me that question yet again EihTooms. I am a guest in the Kingdom of Thailand. I have never had a encounter with the Royal Thai Police since I have been visiting the Kingdom of Thailand.

[EihTooms]

Its especially important to do a historical review of a individual's posting history

Since September 2018 when this RANTS thread was started, Senior Members have been talking their male bovine excrement to each other. They are accusing each other of lying on their dicks mostly. One senior member claimed that he can cum in the mouth of any chick he is with. The other senior member called him out on his claim. Other senior members called out other senior members in a circle jerk that has been going on for eight years.

Looking at it that way I am a relative new on the scene I did not make my first post in the RANTS thread until 2023. So the idea that others have proffered that some how I have messed up this space is historically inaccurate. It also made me realize that the response I get are more like an a initiation. They have been at it a long time. Now with the new kid on the block they want to see if I can take it. They have seen that. Not only can I handle the personal insults, racism and ad hominem attacks. I can handle them without any problem and I give back as good as they can give. That pisses a lot of Senior Members off. So, new people feel free to wade into the RANTS discussions. We need new input and new ideas. Because the Senior Members posted up in this space are getting long in the tooth and they are just repeating the same same arguments in the same circle jerk manner that they have been doing since 2018.

Now there is a specific registered democrat, non-thai citizen, non-member of the bar, pussy whipped mother fuck who lives in Bankgok Thailand, who has made it his mission to make sure as many Thai Girls over the age of 18 enter prostitution. First he argued that my posts were getting in the way of his objective. Now he argues that 18 old girls who read my posts will not understand them. If that is the case he should have no worries. Also, if you review my posting history you will know that I see new girls of all ages signing up to Thai Friendly the dating site. Where perhaps they will meet their life long partner. Or maybe they will leave the site and have a private conversation with someone that allows them to have a meeting in person to pursue other objectives.

You wrote, "The purpose of ISG is to share information on having sex with girls!".

As you have repeatedly misstated the law regarding prostitution in Thailand now you are repeatedly misstating the purpose of ISG as it appears in the General FAQ of this Forum.

InternationalSexGuide FAQ:

What is the purpose of this Forum?
The purpose of this Forum is to facilitate the exchange of information between men who are looking for sex with women.

Note the plain language words in the official stated purpose of ISG that are very different from the words you use that fundamentally change its meaning.

This really isn't complicated or fraught with complex "legalese" that requires an attorney to sort it out for us; you keep getting it wrong. And, worse, you continue to assert the wrong thing and hope others will get it wrong too. To what purpose, nobody knows. Do you?

[EihTooms]

Says right in the article what happened.

https://www.thaiexaminer.com/thai-ne...ongsao-police/

If prostitution is legal in Thailand why was there a sting operation?

I did not! Asked and answered.

Repeat the accusation and you will be in violation Thai Criminal Code (Sections 326333). Reference is made to several posts you have made in the RANTS thread. Defamation in Thailand is a criminal offense governed by the Thai Criminal Code (Sections 326333), meaning individuals can face imprisonment and fines in addition to civil liability. Intent is not required for a conviction; any statement that impairs another's reputation before a third party qualifies as defamation, regardless of whether it was made maliciously.

Is that in plain enough language for you?

SubCmdr:

If prostitution is legal in Thailand why was there a sting operation?

Every detail of the report spells out as explicitly as possible in plain language that the business was operating as a commercial prostitution establishment. The owners were raking off a portion of the sex worker's income as prostitutes.

Everyone knows there are specific Citations and Sections in the Thai Penal Code and the Act stating that activity to be a crimes.

According to your link, the only prostitution-related arrest was of the owner for running the business. The women were busted for foreign worker violations. Similar to what happens on Beach Road, Soi 4, etc.

Meanwhile, there is NO report of the women, the sex workers, the customers or anyone else being arrested "for prostitution", as in consenting adults agreeing to exchange sex for money, money for sex and then engaging in it.

The sting was based on a complaint that the business was employing foreign workers. Were you the one that complained to the police about that? While they were in the club for that, they also discovered the owner of the place was taking a cut of the money some ladies made as prostitutes. How many times have I pointed out in plain language as also stated in plain language in the Code and Act as a crime?

Lolol. SubCmdr, you are truly hilarious! LOL.

The details in that report posted by you is practically a text-book example of what is and is not a crime with regard to prostitution in Thailand. And the part that is not a crime is the part where consenting adults agree to exchange money for sex, sex for money and then engage in that activity, presumably in private in this case since no one was arrested or charged with doing anything "openly and shamelessly in a public place causing a nuisance to the public. ".

Damn. I wish I had posted it first as a clear and unambiguous lesson in plain language of an example of the police not arresting consenting adult prostitutes or their consenting adult customers "for prostitution".