FKK Dietzenbach

[Member #4585]

It sucks the new rule. And it sucks

Yeah, the new rule sucks and not in a good way.

Germany QUO VADIS.

Yes, indeed, Germany, where are you going?

[Hessen Bub]

Codes for BB don't make any sense. Might be fun to get your head around some nice wordings, but that's it.

HB.

[UltraHappy]

That's sarcasm, right?

HB.

I have no idea what Myrrh could have possibly been referring to when he referred to possibly leaving something inside a girl that may have been difficult to later retrieve.

I can only assume that he was talking about food or drink that he may have shared with his girl. I can't think of anything else that would make sense here unless he was talking about filling her head with hopes and dreams or something.

In any case, no need to analyze Myrrh's poetic musings. His poetic musings stand on their own and each reader can take away their own poetic interpretation of his fine writings. In fact, I look forward to reading everyone's creative poetic musings and ascribing my own personal interpretation to each.

[Myrrh]

UH. No, I don't think it was clever. It was quite clear that Myrrh meant condom: it was not a code to fool anyone.

Myrrh was winding me up and he didn't mean to be taken seriously. He was having a little bit of a laugh about my obfuscated information.

No I obviously wasn't trying to be clever (incapable of). But UltraHappy may have hit upon an idea that we could play with for a bit. Even if you disagree that we should self-censor ourselves on this board just because of some new German law, it might be fun in posts going forward to see how many euphemistic expressions we can come up with for describing the activities that we enjoy but which are now illegal.

We all know about the use of expressions such as 'happy ending' and 'full service' in countries where prostitution is illegal. Maybe some new expressions could be coined for the particular situation we find ourselves in here which could enter the lexicon, at least in the world of pay-for-play forums.

[MonSooner]

It sucks the new rule. And it sucks even more that we have to use "code" to communicate our desires and what the ladies are offering behind closed doors and especially as far as Dietzenbach goes what we could often witness very openly on the floor in the chairs for everyone to see. Germany QUO VADIS.

[Optimist]

UH. No, I don't think it was clever. It was quite clear that Myrrh meant condom: it was not a code to fool anyone.

Myrrh was winding me up and he didn't mean to be taken seriously. He was having a little bit of a laugh about my obfuscated information.

[Hessen Bub]

Clever. More proof that, with a little imagination, we can communicate so much without the need to be so explicit about certain services.

That's sarcasm, right?

HB.

[Optimist]

You mean " It's all hearsay from "witnesses" of dubious moral character. " ?

I should have used the sarcasm emoji. That's what many outsiders would consider us, and why posts here would be suspect from the POV of outsiders.

Thanks for the clarification. I had misunderstood that sentence.

[UltraHappy]

Hi Optimist,

9) Was anything belonging to you left inside the girl after the session that would be difficult to fully retrieve.

Clever. More proof that, with a little imagination, we can communicate so much without the need to be so explicit about certain services.

[Neurosynth]

Your last sentence mystifies me. It seems to be a nasty sideswipe at somebody and really undermines your post.

You mean " It's all hearsay from "witnesses" of dubious moral character. " ?

I should have used the sarcasm emoji. That's what many outsiders would consider us, and why posts here would be suspect from the POV of outsiders.

[Optimist]

Went back again today. I did one girl as I was again a bit short on time. Went with Sara, brunette, who provided the service I expected, but didn't include DATY or DFK. 30 euros.

[Luisman01]

Does anyone know if Andrea from Romania is still working at the club? Will be visiting FRA in two weeks and would love to see her for some anal fun.

[Optimist]

I'm referring to the relationship between the house and the girls. *That's* where this issue is going to be decided. We're just occasional customers. The house and the girls are there every day, and they are the ones who are going to call this.

My feeling is that the house is pragmatic as are the girls. It's to the advantage of both that BB services are available, because more customers are better than fewer.

So the house will go through all the motions as if they don't allow BB services. The girls will keep offering them, but only behind closed doors. (Except I've already seen reports of BB services in public areas. _.

The house won't ask girls what happens behind closed doors because they don't want to know. And the girls won't tell the house what happens because they know the house doesn't want to know.

What we talk about here will have approximately no impact. It's all hearsay from "witnesses" of dubious moral character. .

I agree to a large extent with what you say. I would just differ by saying that what we write here will have on its own minimal impact as opposed to no impact.

Your last sentence mystifies me. It seems to be a nasty sideswipe at somebody and really undermines your post.

[Optimist]

Myrrh. Thank you for the interrogation on my visit. Maybe I should complete a tick box form after each session

I did not discuss requirements before I went to the room. I felt that might be counterproductive: just my feeling.

I think my original post gave the answer to the other questions.

More about service details here and in other clubs I will not give: with the campaign by some members to "out" girls who don't comply with rules at any club has ensured that I will not report.

I don't know if the other girls give the same service.

I know you understand exactly what I wrote

[Neurosynth]

Sorry, but how is that part of the 'don't ask, don't tell' plan?

I'm referring to the relationship between the house and the girls. *That's* where this issue is going to be decided. We're just occasional customers. The house and the girls are there every day, and they are the ones who are going to call this.

My feeling is that the house is pragmatic as are the girls. It's to the advantage of both that BB services are available, because more customers are better than fewer.

So the house will go through all the motions as if they don't allow BB services. The girls will keep offering them, but only behind closed doors. (Except I've already seen reports of BB services in public areas. _.

The house won't ask girls what happens behind closed doors because they don't want to know. And the girls won't tell the house what happens because they know the house doesn't want to know.

What we talk about here will have approximately no impact. It's all hearsay from "witnesses" of dubious moral character. .