Angeles City

[Turgid]

By definition, doesn't that make all AC bargirls (and FL and such) a 'skank'?

For those upset by the term, can you pinpoint what is upsetting? If I call a girl an 'escort', or 'provider', or 'wh*re', or 'skank', is one of those terms worse than the others in your mind? Are the terms contemptuous towards women, or just promiscuous women? Are certain derogatory words in place for shaming purposes (shaming can be a legitimate cultural correction)?

Is the very nature of our hobby, bone-jumping non-monogamy, contemptuous? If you answer 'No', would women agree?

In danger of digressing from the main topic of this board I will like to suggest that promiscuity is a moral judgment arising from religion especially the Christian based religions. According to these religions sex outside of marriage is a bad thing and is called fornication. I do not subscribe to this; I believe that sex is a natural bodily function like eating, drinking or even breathing and the berating of individuals for a prodigious sex life is just the criticism of a healthy individual by someone who is perhaps less healthy and / or jealous.

[Socker]

Is the very nature of our hobby, bone-jumping non-monogamy, contemptuous? If you answer 'No', would women agree?

McCobb, or Cobb.

The popular definition of skank is a woman who sleeps around. BFD! Everyone on this board sleeps around.

If it applies to them it applies to you. If you shit where you eat you'll smell your own shit while you eat. Is that a good thing?

It's a square word for loose women created by square uptight people. It's absurd to throw it around here.

And it's good to see the real mr E once in a while.

I even think he's a 'reincarnated' troll that has been harassing us for a long time in the Angeles thread. I can't recall his name however and I can't retrieve his posts, but maybe they have been deleted.

Totally agree. Cheers.

[Chocha Monger]

By definition, doesn't that make all AC bargirls (and FL and such) a 'skank'?

For those upset by the term, can you pinpoint what is upsetting? If I call a girl an 'escort', or 'provider', or 'wh*re', or 'skank', is one of those terms worse than the others in your mind? Are the terms contemptuous towards women, or just promiscuous women? Are certain derogatory words in place for shaming purposes (shaming can be a legitimate cultural correction)?

Is the very nature of our hobby, bone-jumping non-monogamy, contemptuous? If you answer 'No', would women agree?

McCobb, or Cobb.

Skank (n.): "unattractive woman," 1965, perhaps from skag in this sense (1920's), which is of unknown origin. Verbal meaning "dance to reggae music" is from 1976, probably not the same word but also of unknown origin. Related: Skanking.

An unpleasant person, especially a woman who has sex with a lot of different people.

Therefore, "skank" accurately describes the women that Pedro fucked in Angeles City per his reports. Those who feel offended should keep in mind that the majority of the population in their Western homelands consider sex tourism offensive. In fact, some cannot even legally purchase sex in their hometowns. Plus, in the West men who fuck women 10 to 20 years younger are called "dirty old men" and "perverts" or something even worse. For example, in the USA, a 60-year-old aged cock penetrating a 20 to 30-year-old pussy is extremely revolting and unacceptable for most women.

Mongers who do not like their prostitutes referred to as "skanks" can discuss it in the "Safe Space" thread created for snowflake johns. "Skank" is not on the forum's list of censored words. The easily offended liberal sex tourists and sexpats can simply ignore posts from Pedro instead of trying to ban words as they allege Trump did.

[Mogwai]

McCobb, or Cobb.

That's possible. But it wasn't the one I was looking for.

[WestCoast1]

I too was offended by the word and the contempt for women it denotes. Likely I just would have ignored his posts in the future without comment, but I think you guys are correct, and that those of us who dislike the use of derogatory terms should speak up.

I was curious about the common definition of the word "skank" so looked it up in the OED, which says: "derogatory; a promiscuous woman. ".

GE.

By definition, doesn't that make all AC bargirls (and FL and such) a 'skank'?

For those upset by the term, can you pinpoint what is upsetting? If I call a girl an 'escort', or 'provider', or 'wh*re', or 'skank', is one of those terms worse than the others in your mind? Are the terms contemptuous towards women, or just promiscuous women? Are certain derogatory words in place for shaming purposes (shaming can be a legitimate cultural correction)?

Is the very nature of our hobby, bone-jumping non-monogamy, contemptuous? If you answer 'No', would women agree?

I even think he's a 'reincarnated' troll that has been harassing us for a long time in the Angeles thread. I can't recall his name however and I can't retrieve his posts, but maybe they have been deleted.

McCobb, or Cobb.

[Mogwai]

It's common knowledge the BGs, FLs etc are not educated and very simple minded. It's also common knowledge that they are expected to bare back w / their customers. A very few have the nerve / guts to say otherwise but most do as the customer pleases. The bottom line is it's their responsibility to avoid pregnancies but every monger in AC knows these women have no clue about being responsible so the burden is on us. We need to look out after them and not shoot huge loads into their baby makers. Most guys have a sense of responsibility in this regard and shoot outside. Some selfish ones do not. Leave the camp ground better than you found it. We owe to each other.

About two years ago I had a session with a girl who works in a KTV in 'Koreatown' near Friendship. I went bareback with her and she didn't object. Being the gentleman that I am I pulled out when I was about to cum and shoot my load on her belly.
"No! Come inside!" she said. "Put it back in!

About 10 minutes later, when she had left, I found a condom under her pillow. And it wasn't one of mine.
So apparently she didn't have the nerve to ask me to use it, or she had changed her mind.

[Mogwai]

Another question is why only 2 ISGers speak up about this kind of ugliness. We all know better, except one that is.

I wanted to speak up about it but didn't do it because I think he's a troll who WANTS us to speak up, in order to get the attention he's after.

I even think he's a 'reincarnated' troll that has been harassing us for a long time in the Angeles thread. I can't recall his name however and I can't retrieve his posts, but maybe they have been deleted.

[GoodEnough]

I will go on record that I do not like his using the word skank to describe all the girls. If it was an individual account on an incident then fine but I find it offensive to use in general.

On the other hand it has given me an idea about Pedro. Personally Pedro has nothing to offer me and I value his "skanks" much more than him. By his last post I feel Philippines and us would be much better off if he bypass visiting the Philippines.

I too was offended by the word and the contempt for women it denotes. Likely I just would have ignored his posts in the future without comment, but I think you guys are correct, and that those of us who dislike the use of derogatory terms should speak up.

I was curious about the common definition of the word "skank" so looked it up in the OED, which says: "derogatory; a promiscuous woman. ".

GE.

[Dg8787]

Yes he does use the word skank a lot and you and I seem to be the only ones who find it wrong. It's wrong on many levels but if he believes that these women are skanks then why does he hire them for sex. He must not think much of himself either.

Another question is why only 2 ISGers speak up about this kind of ugliness. We all know better, except one that is.

I will go on record that I do not like his using the word skank to describe all the girls. If it was an individual account on an incident then fine but I find it offensive to use in general.

On the other hand it has given me an idea about Pedro. Personally Pedro has nothing to offer me and I value his "skanks" much more than him. By his last post I feel Philippines and us would be much better off if he bypass visiting the Philippines.

[Bushes]

Another question is why only 2 ISGers speak up about this kind of ugliness. We all know better, except one that is.

Sometimes it is like beating a dead horse. Tiger does not change its spots. Look at how Sxxx and his / her view on the Filipina.

Look at the Filipina and opinions thread where I got toasted recently.

I don't leave a trace. But that is just me. It is a choice. Some people like the Kennedy try to drown or bury the evidence.

It has been discussed but I know of non WG that do take a mixed child and don't ask for assistance. Even when the Dad is still in the picture and contactable. Pretty stupid of both parties because of the lost opportunities for the child.

In Angeles, there are a fair number of fresh off the farm freelancers or non WG that I hear off. I would not knock them up in a moment of weakness on her or my part People are screwed up enough as it is.

Happy New Year guys.

[Mr Enternational]

Yes he does use the word skank a lot and you and I seem to be the only ones who find it wrong. It's wrong on many levels but if he believes that these women are skanks then why does he hire them for sex. He must not think much of himself either.

There is no way he could think much of himself talking about those working girls like that. Definitely wrong.

[Socker]

You seem to be using the word 'skank' with a broad brush. Personally I have been with many providers who I would not regard as skanks. My own view is that not every working girl is a skank and vice versa.

Yes he does use the word skank a lot and you and I seem to be the only ones who find it wrong. It's wrong on many levels but if he believes that these women are skanks then why does he hire them for sex. He must not think much of himself either.

Another question is why only 2 ISGers speak up about this kind of ugliness. We all know better, except one that is.

[PedroMorales]

You seem to be using the word 'skank' with a broad brush. Personally I have been with many providers who I would not regard as skanks. My own view is that not every working girl is a skank and vice versa.

Belgian Georges Simenon, the famous detective writer, is also well known for bedding over 10,000 skanks. He is on record as agreeing with your assessment. For all the difference it makes.

Skanks should carry some sort of warning and not just about diseases, erotic, exotic or otherwise. Esteemed posters have raised the moral issues and there are all sorts of risks to us and to them. It would be interesting to see how many Koreans get taken in by their wiles, which are fully understandable.

I've more or less decided my schedule for Pampanga: 5 days x 2 max of skanking and volcano spotting, with more time in quieter places in the Philippines with skanks on tap. That is unless I come across a skank / provider / LBFM who makes me an offer I can't refuse.

[Turgid]

There are documentaries galore, many on youtube, on Pinays GIs impregnated when the bases weere active. Ditto those since impregnated by foreigners, Morally, we should treat the skanks like princesses. Reality is not Pretty Woman.

On a side note, I once shacked up with a skank who had a child by a Dane. She had no interest in chasing him up.

You seem to be using the word 'skank' with a broad brush. Personally I have been with many providers who I would not regard as skanks. My own view is that not every working girl is a skank and vice versa.

[Chocha Monger]

ISG is no place for moral debates, but having a neglected 3rd world rug rat growing up in squalor on my account is not something I want (whether the mother comes after me for money or she doesn't). I remember in Bangkok many years ago waking up to see the Nana Plaza bar girl of the evening fishing a used condom out of the garbage. She was going to try to inseminate herself, told me she wanted a 'gorgeous baby' with blue eyes. A few years later it was a Rio girl claiming I had knocked her up (something a paternity test fortunately proved to be untrue). I can be inclined to go bareback once in a blue moon. When I got to my late 40's and was pretty sure I didn't want any more kids, I got a vasectomy. Best money I ever spent.

That isn't right! The poor girl was really craving that cream pie to have gone scavenging for it from the trash. What a waste of perfectly good cream pie! She deserved a fresh unpackaged batch served piping hot in her snatch. I hope the girls get a full disclosure that now the cream pies come in a sugar-less diet variety that is no longer fattening for 9 months.