FKK Oase - Burgholzhausen

[Ortos]

I think the line up at present at Oase is very strong. Even Evelyn and Eileen have come back.

There is still the tendency of Oase girls migrating to Sharks but there are new girls coming to Oase on a regular basis to make up for that drop out rate.

Yes, I agree that last week the LU at Oase was, at least compared to Sharks, pretty good. Let me stress, however, that by mistake I posted about Evelyn (works at Sharks, has NEVER worked at Oase) in the wrong (Oase) thread. It should have gone to Sharks thread, which I rectified yesterday. So if you are talking about an Evelyn at Oase, it is altogether another girl.

About Oase girls migrating to Sharks (or vice-versa): Absolutely true. Funny to see last Saturday at Sharks a regular Oase (daytime) girl testing the waters in Darmstadt. I am talking about Sofia, now bottle-blonde, who now sometimes uses the new name "Arabella from Hungary" (from Hungary? Yeah, right!). I saw her working her normal shift at Oase on this past Friday, but then on Saturday I saw her working afternoon-early evening hours at Sharks, which I assume was just a one-off test run, or who knows? But it is well known by you, me and many others here that a number of girls are somewhat nomadic, shifting from club to club. Large Hessen clubs like Oase and Sharks seem to be magnets for girls from other clubs, especially girls "on leave" from Switzerland (or so they say).

Indeed, one girl at Sharks opened up to me about her own work history that led her to eventually settle at Sharks. She said she was for 2 years working in Frankfurt RLD (Rotes Haus), then she tried Palace for a very brief time, before she went to Sharks where she's now apparently settled. During this discussion, I casually mentioned that it must be nice to get 50 e /30 mins at an FKK club rather than 25-30 e per session in the RLD. She countered: "No, in the Rotes Haus, it is 50 e /30 mins, same price as here (Sharks). I prefer it here because generally the customers are better quality and it's cleaner conditions here. " She then gestured towards the mass of girls circulating through the Sharks club, circling the bar or sitting on the couches and said: "Probably more than half of all the girls that work here now began by working in RLDs / Windows. " That was her opinion, and I am not in a position of knowledge to judge the accuracy of this.

[Member #4585]

I will add some comments about the Oase line-up in the near future (on this thread).

I think the line up at present at Oase is very strong. Even Evelyn and Eileen have come back.

There is still the tendency of Oase girls migrating to Sharks but there are new girls coming to Oase on a regular basis to make up for that drop out rate.

[Ortos]

Pension Wall is within your budget and within a few minutes stroll to the FKK Oase club itself. There are rolling fields all around and there are horses in those fields too.

Yep: I love the smell of horseshit in the morning.

[Sirioja]

Relax. That was not at all an attack on you. I was just denying the post somebody brought up that the difference between 200 and 280 SFR might have been taxes. Which is wrong. Nothing more.

Globe is 140 CHF = 120 € for each 30 mn, can be 210 CHF = 180 € for 45 mn. Difficult to find same charm and elegance, but can find more hot for sex than Katalina. Could nearly think they are really in love, at least some of the busiest really sell love illusion in room and even after, under shower or in lounge. I remember how her friends look at Sofia behaving with me in lounge after our room, when she needed to ask about me to her friend Anissa who already had room with me. Anissa understood when she saw us.

Can also find top GFE beauties at Westside or History for 100 CHF = 85 € per 30 mn, not more expensive than some Oase or Sharks girls, and not same level, for who looks for quality.

[Member #4585]

Like you, I am not confident that the trend will reverse. With the previous complainers-well they always complained. I am started to hear complaints from mongers who I perceive as the easy-going type. Guys who used to be huge fans of Sharks believe Sharks is no longer the safehaven it once was. That it joins Palace, Mainhattan, and Oase.

In this, sad case, the trend is not your friend.

I agree, I feel more and more, the services are no longer there for 50 bucks, let alone 100 bucks when opting for the one hour. I am finding more and more girls are insisting on 150 bucks for one hour. For certain nationalities it is 200 for the one hour even. Catastrophe.

One part of me cannot blame them. If the value of a 50 bucks in 2002 is worth 60 to 70 bucks now then you can see the resistance in the mental state of girls providing these intimate services for the money earned. So they restrict the services or the time allowed to make up for the lowered value of their 50 buck basic service.

Like Jnpr30 rightly said, I remember you got a lot for your 50 several years ago but this is less the case now.

Both Oase and Sharks are not the safe havens that were touted. I do not know much on the NRW scene so I cannot comment there. Many a Shark will not get off their ass unless there is a hundred involved (sadly, that hundred is not laying inches of schlong meat pipeline).

You must have a deep relationship or connection with the girl before the service and time allowed meets the 50 for full 30 minutes.

A sad indictment indeed.

[Member #4585]

Could someone recommend me a good hotel with a budget around 50-70 per night near the club?

Thanks.

Pension Wall is within your budget and within a few minutes stroll to the FKK Oase club itself. There are rolling fields all around and there are horses in those fields too.

https://taunus.info/wo/uebernachten/...nsion-wall/72/

Other options recommended by the club itself include Arkadia hotel and Mecure hotel in Friedsrichdorf when not in Messe time a price for a single room is below 70 units.

[Member #4636]

Could someone recommend me a good hotel with a budget around 50-70 per night near the club?

Thanks.

[Rogue Nation]

I don't see the relation of you tax considerations to this discussion. You might want to check that all your neurons are firing. I don't really think you deserve a response, but I will entertain this for the sake of other readers. I paid 200 because I asked and then she said, yes. It is simple. Some girls can say no, but some say yes. I love the use of third person singular to refer to people, it is so cool. You must be super cultured my friend. Probably why they will tell you yes as well, you should try it. My cultured friend.

Relax. That was not at all an attack on you. I was just denying the post somebody brought up that the difference between 200 and 280 SFR might have been taxes. Which is wrong. Nothing more.

[Ortos]

Sorry, I meant the post just below to be in the Sharks thread.

I will add some comments about the Oase line-up in the near future (on this thread).

[Ortos]

I visited Sharks a few times over the pasteeek or so. To be honest, I found the LU rather variable from day to day, and as a general statement not too impressive, though there were a few known girls with good performance history, just not too many. I found myself sticking to a few girls I knew, but I did find a hidden gem sitting on the round thingy near the back kino entrance: a quiet yet very erotic girl named Evelyn (note: NOT Evelina.).

Wow what a find! Very GFE-type hour sessions with her, all the intimate elements one might look for, each delivered in an unrushed, very satisfying manner. With the overall LU not at its best, and with mongering conditions on some nights unfavorable, it was a true delight, almost a saviour to go up the stairs hand in hand with Evelyn. And as is often the case, with each session things just got bett and better with her.

Personal observation: I thought things were better overall at Oase: many girls on my to-do list, and many more attract choices. Unlike others' recent reports, I experienced no issues with upselling or any form of upsetting behaviour at either Oase or Sharks.

[AbcInFKK]

[Personal message deleted by Admin]

==============================================

Gentlemen,

Please communicate personal messages via the PM System

The Open Forum is generally intended for the posting of information that is of interest to all readers.

Please use the Forum's Private Message system to exchange personal information and make personal plans.

Thank You

[Danny227]

The point is enforceabilty is a non factor in the empirical decrease of availability. The fact that the law in unenforceable has not prevented BBBJ from being noticeably less of a guarantee. You can't control the hoards of tourist or casual monger to insist on free BBBJ means you cannot prevent resistance to said free BBBJ. Point is, the law had a noticeable effect.

The only effect the law had is that some guys pay for it, some guys don't and some guys don't get it at all. The undisputed effect is, girls make more money. Hence, the desired effect was far from achieved.

[Member #4585]

Through to the latter part of April, there was an acceleration of Oase girls wearing tops to cover their tits. Somehow bottoms were still in absent or somehow exposed as a peek through, but it was the top coverings that were most noticeable.

Then all of a sudden 2 weeks ago, all the tops covering the breasts worm by girls disappeared. It was a revelation. Yes some girls wear tops but these are now see through or expose the tits in some way.

It is much more enjoyable to see naked tits again at Oase.

[Member #4585]

To the extent there is an acceleration of price upwards in the last year (as compared to price increases that were happening anyway before 6/30/17), one could argue the registration issue had as much impact as the BBBJ ban. The former was a tangible issue for the girls; and they may feel they need to get paid a bit more in return for what they had to "invest" in terms of time, effort, money, other. The latter is just another lever they can pull in the price negotiation.

And anecdotally it makes sense. Reports between June 30 to Dec 31 were more benign than in the last few months.

Reports between June 30,2017 to Dec 31,2017; were arguably more benign due to comments for reporters to edit or amend reports to remove references to no condom activities.

[Member #4581]

To the extent there is an acceleration of price upwards in the last year (as compared to price increases that were happening anyway before 6/30/17), one could argue the registration issue had as much impact as the BBBJ ban. The former was a tangible issue for the girls; and they may feel they need to get paid a bit more in return for what they had to "invest" in terms of time, effort, money, other. The latter is just another lever they can pull in the price negotiation.

And anecdotally it makes sense. Reports between June 30 to Dec 31 were more benign than in the last few months.