Thread: Filipinas - Opinions and Advice
+
Add Report
Results 1,561 to 1,575 of 7017
-
09-28-18 01:33 #5457
Posts: 193Question of daddy problems.
I am returning to Philippines in about 40 days for another month are&are so I have been chatting with some girls on DIA. Actually I have a list I call my harem that is so long with girls who want to sleep with me (most for free) I could not get thru them all if I spent 6 months there. Ages 20 to 48 (I have a gift with words I guess). I have been surprised by three of them that want me to impregnate them because they want a baby with a foreigner daddy. I have been snipped (vasectomy) but one I was with on my last trip in August claims she is 3 weeks late, I just really doubt it but I know sometimes it happens although very rare. Probably lying to keep me on a hook or so she thinks. My selfish thought is to offer my non existent sperm to them as an act of kindness. However my big head is saying don't do it because if they get pregnant by another guy and try to pin it on me I will have a world of problems. What say you guys?
-
09-27-18 15:03 #5456
Posts: 16050Originally Posted by KabulGuy [View Original Post]
When I find out a chick broke up with her man because he was cheating I like to ask a few questions. Did he stop paying the bills? Did he stop doing his chores? Did he stop doing his responsibilities with the family? If the answer is yes to any of those then she needed to leave him. If the answer is no to any of them then I tell her she is a dumb bih for breaking up just because he stuck his dick into another hole. So you were willing to lose all the other shit that made you happy and comfortable because of your significant other fucked someone else? People are stupid sometimes.
A couple days ago, a female coworker was saying she went through her fiance's phone to find out if he was cheating. She said they had broken up for a while before because she saw he was writing messages to another chick. I told her if she was looking for something then she will find it. And that cheating is the glue that holds relationships together. You gotta get out there every now and then to see how fucked up things are in order to know how good you have it at home.
-
09-27-18 14:49 #5455
Posts: 16050Originally Posted by Hootas [View Original Post]
So then I was pretty sure it was a chick that I started messing with last month. Plus I thought remembered her telling me something about her birthday. So when the first chick got home she sent me a message saying she was drunk. I asked her if Ploy was drunk too. She said how you know her name. I said because I know her.
Then she started asking questions like if I fucked her. I told her that she was asking too many questions then I just told her yes. She said the girl was a good friend of hers and they have known each other 10 years. I said well keep it in the family I guess. She said she was sad but not angry and as long as I was happy then it was fine with her.
She also said that the friend told her we had not been together. I told her I did not know why she would lie and told her exactly how I met her on Tinder and went to her shop to get a massage and picked her up after work and she stayed with me.
Ploy was a little different. She tried to play that role like she was hurt. What she didn't know was that the other girl had already inadvertently told me she had a boyfriend. (While the first girl was at the disco she said that her friend went home because her boyfriend called.) So she did not have a leg to stand on. She said that she would not see me again and that she was sorry that she did her boyfriend wrong. I told her that she would see me again and that her friend was fine with it. I knew that if she really did not want to see me again then she would not have kept talking to me.
My brother said that he would not have told her. I told him that I am a player. The day that I starr being scared of losing a chick will probably be the day that I start losing them.
Then there is my new chick in Manila that tried to tie me down. I just had to explain it to her (last screen shot). That made all the difference in the world. So just stop being full of shit and be honest with people for a change. (I guess it helps to have a little game too!) The results may surprise you.
-
09-27-18 13:54 #5454
Posts: 984Originally Posted by Hootas [View Original Post]
-
09-27-18 13:00 #5453
Posts: 31Originally Posted by NiceGuy99 [View Original Post]
Can you elaborate on the statement, "In my case my wife knows I have relationships overseas. "? How did you pull this off? This seems like the best of both worlds. A wife as home base and a hot new thing for a little excursion. I envy your situation. Looking for details and / or coaching here.
- Hootas.
-
09-24-18 15:01 #5452
Posts: 1575Originally Posted by KabulGuy [View Original Post]
-
09-24-18 10:16 #5451
Posts: 984Originally Posted by WiseHustler [View Original Post]
My biggest complaint with Sex at Dawn is that they quickly discount all evolutionary changes since the dawn of the agricultural age. They rather dismissively say that 20,000 years since agriculture is simply too short to be relevant. However humans can evolve quicker than that. I once read an estimate that it would be between 5,000 and 10,000 years for a population to achieve the "correct" skin colour for the environment if they moved from the north to the equator or the other way around. There is evidence that agriculture existed 23,000 years ago, not 20 k as they state. Small difference but it does show that they may have cherry picked their data a little. Of course agriculture developed over a long time, it did not spring up fuly in a short period of time.
-
09-24-18 09:25 #5450
Posts: 984Originally Posted by Blanquiceleste [View Original Post]
QED LOL.
-
09-24-18 08:57 #5449
Posts: 4051Originally Posted by SoapySmith [View Original Post]
GE.
-
09-24-18 05:09 #5448
Posts: 1562Originally Posted by GoodEnough [View Original Post]
-
09-24-18 05:01 #5447
Posts: 1562Originally Posted by KabulGuy [View Original Post]
I think most people treat Morris as a sociobiologist, but the **Naked Ape** may be more of a 50 year old splash that was long on speculation and short on evidence. It's possible **Sex at Dawn** will be viewed this way in the future.
I started to write some stuff about the more prominent sociobiologist, E. O. Wilson, and then remembered that this a forum about sex with Filipinas.
-
09-24-18 04:50 #5446
Posts: 160Originally Posted by GoodEnough [View Original Post]
-
09-24-18 04:32 #5445
Posts: 4051Originally Posted by KabulGuy [View Original Post]
I do like the discursive, irreverent style and the quick summaries of the gist of prior research, though I think the book's overall point could have been made more succinctly. Nonetheless, it's a fun, easy read.
GE.
-
09-24-18 01:18 #5444
Posts: 1575Math 101 for Pinays
Meanwhile in other news, I have the Filipina from Cebu who wrote to me this morning. An excerpt.
Girl: Good morning honey. I go province on 05 November.
Me: Great. But that is quite some time away. How you make plan so early?
Girl: Not much time. Only 36 days left.
Me: Oh! OK. Good luck.
Now go figure how 24 Sep to 05 Nov is only 36 days.
-
09-24-18 00:41 #5443
Posts: 984Originally Posted by SoapySmith [View Original Post]
For example, Morris wrote that the intense human pair bond evolved so that men who were out hunting could trust that their mates back home were not having sex with other men,:
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Naked_Ape.
However Sex at Dawn Postulates "In opposition to what the authors see as the "standard narrative" of human sexual evolution, they contend that having multiple sexual partners was common and accepted in the environment of evolutionary adaptedness. Mobile self-contained groups of hunter gatherers are posited as the human norm before agriculture led to high population density. According to the authors, before agriculture, sex was relatively promiscuous, and paternity was not a concern, in a similar way to the mating system of Bonobos. According to the book, sexual interactions strengthened the bond of trust in the groups; far from causing jealousy, social equilibrium and reciprocal obligation was strengthened by playful sexual interactions. ".
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_at_Dawn.
The only real commonality between the two is that they both state that our desires are genetically hard wired and supported by physical manifestations caused by genetic selection over evolutionary time frames.
Sex at Dawn refers to a process that they call "Flinstonization" That is projecting our current cultural adaption of pair bonding to prehistoric humans who were pre agricultural and had no concept of property, parenthood and genetic lineage I. E. Making the prehistoric humans the modern stone age family. They postulate that the rise of agricultural societies made humans develop a concept of property (including women as property that needed to be protected from other males) and that this made parentage important so that property could be passed to offspring.