American Politics

[Elvis 2008]

And, of course, in the midst of something like Trump's Pandemic, one never knows for certain if you are the infected one today or not. Consequently, everyone in the room needs to wear a mask for the mitigation measure to work as intended.

See, a study that shows someone wearing a mask will still inhale much of whatever is airborne in the room misses the point. But those types love to miss the point. So they cite those studies.

The mask is meant more to reduce the amount of potential bad bugs otherwise exhaled freely and unfiltered into a room, not so much to prevent whatever does get past that mask and into the air from being inhaled by everyone else in the room, masked or not.

Here's an easy way to illustrate how much they miss the point. Well, it ought to be easy:

When doctors and nurses wear masks while performing a surgical procedure, it isn't so much to prevent them from catching something in the air coming out of the open wound they made in the chest of a go-go bar girl getting the boob job today. No, it is more to prevent whatever they might have caught at the pub last night, a cold virus, the flu virus, the measles, chicken pox, whatever, from being expelled directly into the open wound they just made in their patient.

Get it now, guys?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4480558/

"The evidence base investigating the effects of facemask usage on patient-based outcomes is, in general, more extensive than that of surgeon-centred outcomes. Facemasks do have a clear role in maintaining the social cleanliness of surgical staff, but evidence is lacking to suggest that they confer protection from infection either to patients or to the surgeons that wear them. ".

Yeah, I got it, so surgeons wearing masks are customary, tradition without any evidence. And your blaming Trump for the pandemic is also without proven evidence and is a tradition.

And your saying following the science is bullshit too. There were a few anecdotal reports suggesting masks worked but it was never proven they did, and the study PVM cited was that masks "worked" was a fucking joke.

So yeah, I repeat, Trump is responsible for a million Covid deaths and Biden is responsible for none. We got it. It is your tradition, and it is proof that you are fucking nuts.

[PVMonger]

I think the part of the highly effective proper mask wearing mitigation measure that JustTK and others like him keep missing is that the mask works more to reduce the amount of possible virus particles expelled by the mask wearer into the air rather than to prevent them from inhaling whatever is in the air around them. The more virus particles get trapped or filtered out of an infected person wearing a mask, the fewer particles per million are circulating in the space for anyone else with or without a mask to inhale.

And, of course, in the midst of something like Trump's Pandemic, one never knows for certain if you are the infected one today or not. Consequently, everyone in the room needs to wear a mask for the mitigation measure to work as intended.

See, a study that shows someone wearing a mask will still inhale much of whatever is airborne in the room misses the point. But those types love to miss the point. So they cite those studies.

The mask is meant more to reduce the amount of potential bad bugs otherwise exhaled freely and unfiltered into a room, not so much to prevent whatever does get past that mask and into the air from being inhaled by everyone else in the room, masked or not.

Here's an easy way to illustrate how much they miss the point. Well, it ought to be easy:

RethugliKKKans are too stupid to "get it". They are, as a group, too stupid to get vaccinated but are smart enough to drink bleach while trying to shove a lightbulb up their asses like the Orange Buffoon suggested.

[Gino02]

Gas, diapers, essential items will be tax-free in Florida.

https://www.facebook.com/alan.hanes....68380557418282

That's how a good Governor takes care of his people during an inflation crisis. In addition to always no income tax in the state.

[Gino02]

Oh look! A rare case of a Dem committing voter / election fraud instead of a Repub.

Happy?

The Pattern of GOP Voter Fraud
In case after case from 2020, it turns out that Republicans were the ones misbehaving at the ballot box.

https://www.thebulwark.com/the-patte...p-voter-fraud/

Still looking for anyone pleaded guilty or convicted guilty for ballot stuffing (which is way more worse than few people voting twice) for GOP, like there's many for Democrats (just Google it man). Got any?

And, you say Dems are better than GOP, but this Dems ballot stuffing guilty plea brings Dems at least at the same level as GOP, agreed now?

[EihTooms]

https://politicalwire.com/2022/06/09...-the-day-3229/

Yeah, your good friend Bernie's expanded message is that the Dems need to make it clear to the American people that "conservatives" of both parties are Do Nothing corporate hack bullshitters and if you want good things for America, vote 'them out.

That would include every Repub in both houses of Congress and 2 Dem Senators:

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/0...terms-00038183

"Say to the American people: Look, we dont have the votes to do it right now. We have two corporate Democrats who are not going to be with us, Sanders said, referring to Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.).

The leadership has got to go out and say we don't have the votes to pass anything significant right now. Sorry. You got 48 votes. And we need more to pass it. That should be the message of this campaign.

Thanks for the lead to your good friend Bernie's full message. I've been stating that same message for decades.

[Elvis 2008]

I'll show you examples of you praising the Orange Buffoon when you show examples of the RCTs that prove unequivocably that masks don't help stop the spread of COVID. "A randomized-trial of community-level mask promotion in rural Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic shows that the intervention increased mask usage and reduced symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, demonstrating that promoting community mask-wearing can improve public health. " https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9069.

"The proportion of individuals with COVID-19 like symptoms was 7. 63% (N = 12,784) in the intervention arm and 8. 60% (N = 13,287) in the control arm, an estimated 11.6% reduction after controlling for baseline covariates."

Covid like symptoms does not mean you even have Covid.

"the intervention reduced symptomatic seroprevalence by 9.5% (control prevalence = 0.76%; treatment prevalence = 0.68%.

And wearing a mask lowered your chance of testing + for Covid from 0.76% to 0.68%? And you think that is important?

And where does it say masks saved lives?

You just linked a study showing how fucking worthless masks are and were.

[EihTooms]

I'll show you examples of you praising the Orange Buffoon when you show examples of the RCTs that prove unequivocably that masks don't help stop the spread of COVID. "A randomized-trial of community-level mask promotion in rural Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic shows that the intervention increased mask usage and reduced symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, demonstrating that promoting community mask-wearing can improve public health. " https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9069.

I think the part of the highly effective proper mask wearing mitigation measure that JustTK and others like him keep missing is that the mask works more to reduce the amount of possible virus particles expelled by the mask wearer into the air rather than to prevent them from inhaling whatever is in the air around them. The more virus particles get trapped or filtered out of an infected person wearing a mask, the fewer particles per million are circulating in the space for anyone else with or without a mask to inhale.

And, of course, in the midst of something like Trump's Pandemic, one never knows for certain if you are the infected one today or not. Consequently, everyone in the room needs to wear a mask for the mitigation measure to work as intended.

See, a study that shows someone wearing a mask will still inhale much of whatever is airborne in the room misses the point. But those types love to miss the point. So they cite those studies.

The mask is meant more to reduce the amount of potential bad bugs otherwise exhaled freely and unfiltered into a room, not so much to prevent whatever does get past that mask and into the air from being inhaled by everyone else in the room, masked or not.

Here's an easy way to illustrate how much they miss the point. Well, it ought to be easy:

When doctors and nurses wear masks while performing a surgical procedure, it isn't so much to prevent them from catching something in the air coming out of the open wound they made in the chest of a go-go bar girl getting the boob job today. No, it is more to prevent whatever they might have caught at the pub last night, a cold virus, the flu virus, the measles, chicken pox, whatever, from being expelled directly into the open wound they just made in their patient.

Get it now, guys?

[EihTooms]

Still waiting for opinions on this news from our Democrat experts here, but so far crickets! Can someone please help us naive Republicans on what to learn from this guilty plea on ballot stuffing? Thanks in advance.

Oh look! A rare case of a Dem committing voter / election fraud instead of a Repub.

Happy?

The Pattern of GOP Voter Fraud
In case after case from 2020, it turns out that Republicans were the ones misbehaving at the ballot box.

https://www.thebulwark.com/the-patte...p-voter-fraud/

[Gino02]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...ats/ar-AAYb1VS

A former congressman from Philadelphia has pleaded guilty to charges related to fraudulently stuffing ballot boxes for Democratic candidates between 2014 and 2018. Federal prosecutors said former Democratic USA Rep. Ozzie Myers pleaded guilty Monday to violations of election law, conspiracy, bribery and obstruction.

Still waiting for opinions on this news from our Democrat experts here, but so far crickets! Can someone please help us naive Republicans on what to learn from this guilty plea on ballot stuffing? Thanks in advance.

[MarquisdeSade1]

You haven't read anything tying economic boom times with Dem administrations (captains on a ship) and economic plunges with Repub administrations over the past 100 years?

Then I recommend you RTFF where I and others have posted links for the timelines for economic trends as related to the POTUS dozens of times or just do a few simple Google Searches yourself on topics like Jobs Created By Presidential Term, History of USA Depressions and Recessions, Bureau of Labor Statistics for its Unemployment Rate By Month Table, etc.

Let me know if a pattern doesn't jump out at you within the first minute of reading any of it. Assuming you also know the timelines for when Dems took over as captain vs when Repubs took over as captain, that is.

And, bear in mind, the word "all" is a word you used here in order to establish an easy "win" for the crap results side, "Bothsiderism". My contention is about the major ups and downs over the past 100 tears, not every piddling momentary sell off or set back.

For example, we just had a quarter of 1.5% negative growth. If the next quarter is negative by 1-3% then it could possibly be considered a recession. Although it is debatable whether or not the official arbiter of such things, National Bureau of Economic Research, would call it one because those two consecutive quarters of economic contraction are so minor, occurred in the midst of ongoing significant jobs creation and wage growth and they barely caused a blip uptick in the unemployment rate.

That would put them in the category of mini recessions like the one we had under Truman and the one we had under Carter.

That would be nothing like Hoover's Great Depression "stewardship", the 3 recessions we had under Captain Eisenhower, the Great Recession under Captain Reagan, the long Recession under Captain Bush1, the next Great Recession under Captain Bush2 or the huge one under Captain Trump.

In those major economic downturns the contractions, jobs losses and / or unemployment rate increases were significant, often historically so.

https://politicalwire.com/2022/06/09...-the-day-3229/

[PVMonger]

It's you that demonstrates you lack of clarity in every post. You are really blindered by your huge bias. Show me even one example of me praising Trump. Your world view is clear. If you do not criticize everything Trump does, then your a Trump-loving duck.

And on masks. You have mentioned this many times, as if it were conclusive that they do work. All 10 RCTs that have ever been done on wearing masks to protect against airborn transmission, all failed to demonstrate any conclusive benefit of wearing masks. You are truly a lost cause, and one the reasons that the clock is reaching 12 noon armageddon time.

I'll show you examples of you praising the Orange Buffoon when you show examples of the RCTs that prove unequivocably that masks don't help stop the spread of COVID. "A randomized-trial of community-level mask promotion in rural Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic shows that the intervention increased mask usage and reduced symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, demonstrating that promoting community mask-wearing can improve public health. " https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9069.

[EihTooms]

If that were the case, or indeed if I felt believed that were the case, then no doubt I would be right there with you. I haven't studied any attempt made and tying all economic highs w Dems and all lows w Reps (maybe you can link smthg on that? But I have studied international politics and economics for a long time. What I do know, as you already allude to, is that any policy decision or significant event takes a long time to show in economic consequences. And many factors are often at play, either working together or against each other.

The most significant factors that shape these outcomes are geograpical and geological, as well as the development / evolution of human society. Any politcial leader / party is like a captain on a ship, riding across a huge ocean. He cannot control the ocean, all he can do is try to attend to the needs of the passengers as the ship rides over the huge swells.

You haven't read anything tying economic boom times with Dem administrations (captains on a ship) and economic plunges with Repub administrations over the past 100 years?

Then I recommend you RTFF where I and others have posted links for the timelines for economic trends as related to the POTUS dozens of times or just do a few simple Google Searches yourself on topics like Jobs Created By Presidential Term, History of USA Depressions and Recessions, Bureau of Labor Statistics for its Unemployment Rate By Month Table, etc.

Let me know if a pattern doesn't jump out at you within the first minute of reading any of it. Assuming you also know the timelines for when Dems took over as captain vs when Repubs took over as captain, that is.

And, bear in mind, the word "all" is a word you used here in order to establish an easy "win" for the crap results side, "Bothsiderism". My contention is about the major ups and downs over the past 100 tears, not every piddling momentary sell off or set back.

For example, we just had a quarter of 1.5% negative growth. If the next quarter is negative by 1-3% then it could possibly be considered a recession. Although it is debatable whether or not the official arbiter of such things, National Bureau of Economic Research, would call it one because those two consecutive quarters of economic contraction are so minor, occurred in the midst of ongoing significant jobs creation and wage growth and they barely caused a blip uptick in the unemployment rate.

That would put them in the category of mini recessions like the one we had under Truman and the one we had under Carter.

That would be nothing like Hoover's Great Depression "stewardship", the 3 recessions we had under Captain Eisenhower, the Great Recession under Captain Reagan, the long Recession under Captain Bush1, the next Great Recession under Captain Bush2 or the huge one under Captain Trump.

In those major economic downturns the contractions, jobs losses and / or unemployment rate increases were significant, often historically so.

[EihTooms]

Agreed. Its a waste of time to chat to people that cannot exchange opinions without hurling insults if you don't agree with them. So many of these here. Hmmmh, I wonder what they have in common? Hehe.

So you just agreed with somebody who hurled an insult at those who disagree with him (as do the facts) and you are apparently just fine with his post that appears not to contain one single provably true sentence or phrase in it. LOL.

Perfect.

[JustTK]

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it must be a duck.
everything you post praises the Orange Buffoon...wear masks..
For someone who doesn't have enough IQ points to decorate a domino to say someone else lacks critical thinking skills is laughable.

It's you that demonstrates you lack of clarity in every post. You are really blindered by your huge bias. Show me even one example of me praising Trump. Your world view is clear. If you do not criticize everything Trump does, then your a Trump-loving duck.

And on masks. You have mentioned this many times, as if it were conclusive that they do work. All 10 RCTs that have ever been done on wearing masks to protect against airborn transmission, all failed to demonstrate any conclusive benefit of wearing masks. You are truly a lost cause, and one the reasons that the clock is reaching 12 noon armageddon time.

[JustTK]

JustTK, no point in arguing with the dumb Dems .

Agreed. Its a waste of time to chat to people that cannot exchange opinions without hurling insults if you don't agree with them. So many of these here. Hmmmh, I wonder what they have in common? Hehe.