Thread: Stupid shit in Medellin
+
Add Report
Results 2,326 to 2,340 of 7299
-
12-13-22 04:46 #4974
Posts: 2579
-
12-02-22 17:19 #4973
Posts: 3338Originally Posted by Villainy [View Original Post]
A better way to have put it was that I was just as dumb as Fauci and so were you and everyone else here, and that is not narcissistic; that is fact.
The problem with Democratic douches like yourself is that you pay off and deify someone with the title of "scientist", and we are supposed to follow everything that person says and damn the data or in this case, pretend there was data.
What played out is that Trump listened to Xi in China said "he is my friend" and believed him when Xi said Covid was contained. Josh Rogin of the Washington Post said this on Joe Rogan's show and Joe Rogan groaned and so did I. I had little doubt that this happened as it sounded just like something Trump would do.
And your being a Democratic douche, V, I expect you to believe that too. What you will not believe is that Fauci pretty much did the same thing. He sent one guy to China and crafted policy based on what China was doing and what they told his guy.
You douches seem to recall my saying the virus would kill 80,000. What you forget was that was based on the curve of the initial variant. When that trend was broken, I concluded way before anyone else that the virus had changed. Back then, your douche paper of record the NYT was breathlessly pointing out all the countries which handled Covid better than the USA. I said of those countries "just you wait, they will get hit too", and they were. In fact, China's policy of lockdowns is blowing up in their face just as it did in Colombia.
Even now even with the evidence that the only thing severe lockdowns do is create riots you Democratic douches all would have us go into lockdowns if Covid surged again. Hell, with you douches, lockdowns were not the greatest health policy debacle ever. No, they would have worked if Republicans (and Colombians) had been more compliant.
Of course, the data says otherwise, and my articles were data reliant. It is no wonder you were intimidated by them. You had no answer for them but arrogance.
And your douchery shows its ways with investing as well. It is Democratic douches like yourself who make the claim, "everyone knows you are undereducated. " That is as delusional a statement as one can make. First, do you have any data showing education levels equals better market performance? Of course not. Peter Lynch said that investing is more about the stomach than the brain, and I agree with that.
And despite the fact that I have said why I made 2500% in one stock is irrelevant to our current discussion, you dismiss it out of hand. Why? You have no data to say otherwise. You just do not want to believe it.
And finally, the people on ISG who have met me would very much dispute the education level comment not that it means anything outside of showing you are a douche who think your education level somehow means you are more likely to be correct about something. It is irrelevant to investing as all that matters with investing once again is data.
Speaking of irrational, a friend showed me his newsletter and was disappointed when I suggest he throw it in the trash. All the 2022 picks were in the red, and he gave an overly rosy S&P 500 prediction. My friend knows logistics and was certain companies he bought in the field were going up. After the market went sky high after the Fed press conference, a total nothingburger IMO, he called me up and said I told you so.
Maybe you have learned something V because you did not take the occasion to beat your chest. I agree with your prediction on interest rates and more importantly so do those who buy and sell Fed fund futures, however, you did what you always do and ignored the huge elephant or in this case bear in the room, the inverted yield curve. The traders and investors on CNBC's Fast Money are not as blind as you. They had on an economist who pointed out how the yield curve inversion and a few other markers always point to recession. There was then a healthy debate on which to listen to the sunny stock market or gloomy bond market and of some market tailwinds but no one dismissed the bond market and the overwhelming response for those invested dare I say consensus was to take profits in stocks, keep your powder dry, and listen to the bond market. In fact, all the Fast Money traders heard the same old nothing new message from the Fed as I did.
And I suspect you already know what my response would have been had you beaten your chest. Yes, I bought SQQQ at $45 and am looking to add more at $40. If we have another market decline I will unload some and look to buy more on the cheap. And when we hit the inevitable recession, I will unload it for good. That is my market strategy. And when the recession hits and the market hits its inevitable decline, then I will look at fixed income vehicle like REITs. It is not the right time for REITs. Stocks hit their bottom when the Fed finishes raising rates.
So you are not totally wrong V. You are just early and just as I saw all the investments the newsletter picked out in 2022, I know your investments went down too. If you were not short and had more than one stock like Dollar General, you were down. Still, if you had a brain, you would look at this Fed induced rally to take some profits on your REITs and look to get back into them at a later time. Maybe even (Gasp) go short for a change.
And enough with this quality shit. Microsoft is a quality company and they pulled out of real estate and selling items in Microsoft stores. The whole notion than that you REITs have quality companies paying rents is ludicrous then. The real issue is not the company's quality but how dependent they are on having a physical location. The pandemic changed that metric for many businesses.
And no doubt if you applied your quality model to airlines, you would have put your nose up at Spirit. It is at $21.25 a share and has a shareholder accepted offer of $33.50 per share from Jet Blue. If the deal is blocked for antitrust reasons, JetBlue will pay Spirit a $70 million reverse breakup fee and will pay Spirit's shareholders $400 million. So the airline that is the worst quality wise has the greatest room to advance in the near term. Stocks are either over, fairly, or undervalued and the market may give a higher multiple for "quality" but that is all that it means.
-
12-01-22 07:55 #4972
Posts: 16009Originally Posted by PigSavinBoy [View Original Post]
-
12-01-22 03:47 #4971
Posts: 16009Originally Posted by RamDavidson84 [View Original Post]
-
11-30-22 22:03 #4970
Posts: 95Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
In this hypothetical scenario she would already need to be plugged in and knowing all the right people and proper amounts that don't set anyone accidentally on fire or make one slip and fall on a knife several times.
-
11-30-22 21:53 #4969
Posts: 395Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]
I could never or want to imagine an America where the predominant form of personal travel is public transportation. The convenience of the personal automobile is something I don't mind working a extra few hours for, I think most Americans would agree as well.
-
11-30-22 21:23 #4968
Posts: 1822Originally Posted by PigSavinBoy [View Original Post]
-
11-30-22 19:45 #4967
Posts: 5496Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]
Forget about the price of gasoline. Gasoline is mainly for entertainment. The country runs on diesel. I drive more than most and I'll probably buy about 400 gallons of gasoline this year. I've already bought over 20,000 gallons of diesel. That's just 1 truck.
-
11-30-22 19:32 #4966
Posts: 5496Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]
Had me confused for a second until I realized you were talking about streetcars. With only a few exceptions, public transportation in the US sucks. But that's one of those evil socialism things. Using tax money to provide low cost transportation, even if eventually it will pay for itself, isn't popular with many.
-
11-30-22 16:28 #4965
Posts: 95Originally Posted by MrEnternational [View Original Post]Originally Posted by JustTK [View Original Post]
Seriously though makes no difference to me and I don't consider it important when choosing a girl (unless she's a cherry of course), nor do I ask them about it; just killing some time at work and for some reason started to wonder how much do the girls actually make per month, and whether it's a good salary (locally). So to get an idea of that I figure it could be approximated from the average numbers of monthly fucks.
And I do agree, I'd rather get in with a girl with some experience under her belt, same as I'd rather hire an experienced electrician not someone fresh out of school.
-
11-30-22 15:38 #4964
Posts: 1822Originally Posted by PigSavinBoy [View Original Post]
-
11-30-22 05:33 #4963
Posts: 16009Originally Posted by JjBee62 [View Original Post]
In the States once upon a time street cars were the thing. They were very economical and environmentally friendly. But I think it was the rubber companies that were not having that. They wanted to sell more tires so they made those street cars disappear. Progress is not always progress. A lot of times it is just corporations trying to increase profits.
-
11-30-22 05:16 #4962
Posts: 16009Originally Posted by RamDavidson84 [View Original Post]
-
11-30-22 05:09 #4961
Posts: 16009Originally Posted by PigSavinBoy [View Original Post]
-
11-29-22 23:38 #4960
Posts: 95Mileage
So, how often do the Medellin working women actually work, aka fuck?
My fucks per month guestimates:
Centro SW: 15-40.
Centro casa girl: 15-50.
Centro stripper: 10-20.
FB chica: 5-15.
One Centro SW once told me (out of the blue) that she slept with 120 men (and was extremely curious how many women did I sleep with; told her she was my first of course).
Knowing women, the real number is probably x2 or more, though I was surprised she was even counting at that point.
She was 21 at the time, worked every day 2 pm until 6 pm except Sunday and seemed to have at least one client every day. So that is at least 26 fucks per month, which, assuming 40 mil per fuck, adds up to the minimum wage of 1 k mil, for the total of 13 hours time spent on the back.