Montreal

[QUOTE=DethManRulz;2155805]Cameras recording things in every room is something a fella might want to know about.[/QUOTE]On the XO ad the last 2 days is a "temporary " picture of Kylie.

I wonder how the picture was taken? What do you guys think?

Best Regards.

Smuler.

[QUOTE=Mongerer88;2160582]One agency we haven't mentioned in the last few pages is Xxxtase.

So in the spirit of listing the major Montreal agencies and some of their best reviewed GFE ladies, here is Xxxtase and Amanda and Daphne.

[URL]https://montrealxxxtase.com/our-ladies/[/URL][/QUOTE]You know they used to be my go to agency. I can remember using them early on and Martin was outstanding for customer service. Somehow, when Martin was running his restaurant, I started using Eleganza. When E went under, I tried to use Delights and I had a rotten experience and got into it a bit with the booker on that local. Over moderated. Forum. Delights was part of Xxxtase somehow and so I never went back. Thinking about it, if Martin is back I would give them a shot again.

Smuler - I don't know. I like it. LOL

[QUOTE=Monger718;2159272]Anyone have an experience with this agency? Some hot chicks and they are open late. Are they GFE? Any upsells? Are they reliable?

Thank you in advance.[/QUOTE]Keep Megan of Godiva on your radar. The agency says she's on a break. Megan was one of the few girls to post face shots. Pretty blonde with light eyes. Naturally busty, curvy body, not a spinner. Great reviews.

As soon as we make lists, they get outdated.

It appears that Bianca formerly of the Unicorns and most recently with Mike's Mansion has left the business.

As I mentioned based on my experience with her, she did mind-blowingly good BBBJ and anal.

If anal sex is important to you, replace her with Evelyn at Mike's Mansion when making a Mikes Mansion list.

Evelyn has outstanding reviews as a GFE, BBBJ young doll-face girl with tiny A-cup breasts, which is a fantasy for many guys.

And her reviews indicate that she loves anal, and is exceptionally good at it.

One of the most bizarre misconceptions to me on John discussion board is that "bigger" ladies are better at anal. I find the opposite to be true. Young athletic girls are much better at working that muscle and getting a guy in there.

[URL]http://www.mikesmansion.com/onegirl.php[/URL]

Pretty sad Bianca retired. Was looking forward to seeing her too. Anyone got recommendations on girls who can provide a nice lap dance and solid BBBJ?

[QUOTE=Mongerer88;2161340]One of the most bizarre misconceptions to me on John discussion board is that "bigger" ladies are better at anal. I find the opposite to be true. Young athletic girls are much better at working that muscle and getting a guy in there.[/QUOTE]Please elaborate. I think maybe the Montreal guys were talking about bigger vs. Smaller girls. I'm not sure what you are saying about "young, athletic girls are much better at working that muscle. ". Do you mean small, athletic girls as well as bigger girls? Athletic girls vs. Girls that are not tone? Are we also alluding to some kegel advantages athletic girls might have? Just curious.

Thanks for your input. .

[QUOTE=WyattEarp;2161807]Please elaborate. I think maybe the Montreal guys were talking about bigger vs. Smaller girls. I'm not sure what you are saying about "young, athletic girls are much better at working that muscle. ". Do you mean small, athletic girls as well as bigger girls? Athletic girls vs. Girls that are not tone? Are we also alluding to some kegel advantages athletic girls might have? Just curious.

Thanks for your input..[/QUOTE]Not based on a scientific study, just personal observation and experience, but I did have a very detailed discussion regarding this subject with a provider I repeated with a lot who loved anal. It is really just a question of relaxing that muscle (with lube of course) and some girls can do it, and some can't. Ladies who do yoga usually learn how to relax any muscle, including that one. And most women who do yoga are slim and athletic, and very often younger. Of course, any lady who has ever had a tear back there probably doesn't want to do much anal sex, and the older someone gets, the more likely that she has at some point had a tear from bowel movements. So those were my thoughts. You so often read reviews of tiny women who do anal sex with the comment that the reviewer didn't think it would fit. I don't think there is any widening of that body part when weight is gained, so it is amusing that a guy would think it would fit up the back end of a "not so tiny" lady.

Every lady recommended in the last three pages can do those things. All the ladies I mention favorably by summarizing reviews from the local board are BBBJ. I am not a CBJ guy. And every escort will do grinding lap dances if asked.

[QUOTE=HoopsOnHoop;2161800]Pretty sad Bianca retired. Was looking forward to seeing her too. Anyone got recommendations on girls who can provide a nice lap dance and solid BBBJ?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Smuler;2160954]On the XO ad the last 2 days is a "temporary " picture of Kylie.

I wonder how the picture was taken? What do you guys think?

Best Regards.

Smuler.[/QUOTE]Good catch. Creepy as hell. Looks like a surveillance app screenshot.

[QUOTE=Monger718;2151783][URL]http://www.escortsxo.com/portfolio/brittany-xo/[/URL]

Any reports or feed back on her?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Mongerer88;2151831]Treat this with skepticism, because it is just what someone posted and has not been confirmed.[/QUOTE]New here but also a long-term member of the local board.

Brittany at XO used to be Roxanne at XXXtase. I met her when she was there; didn't find her reviews at Mojo until afterwards otherwise I would have not booked her. She also worked briefly at GoodGirls before Mojo, BTW. Nice girl, good looking, but service was on the mechanical side of things. Pretty much has been the trend with her. Wouldn't repeat.

[QUOTE=Monger718;2157279]XO. By far the most girls on my TDL with the best reviews.

Amamda.

Scarlet / Megan / Catherine (only of on the three because fair skin really inst my thing, but want that 5 star experience).

Noemie.

Bella.

Dasha..[/QUOTE]Of the XO girls, the ones who should be on anyone's list are Scarlett, Shelly, Meghan, Amanda, and Elena. I've met Scarlett and Shelly, and their attitude, looks and service were excellent. The other girls I haven't met, but they have long review threads that speak for themselves.

All the other XO girls, I'd take those reviews on the local board with a grain of salt. Some like Dasha already seem rather YMMV. Biggest problem is that many of these girls have primarily been reviewed by the band of cheerleaders who brag about their parties, and their friends. They're all buddies of the agency owner. So the girls might be good but it's fair to say there's probably a lot of over-ecstatic and pussy-high reviews being written by that lot.

The same thing is happening with the reviews for Euphoria girls but to a lesser extent. These guys are trying to get into the good graces of the agency owners by constantly writing these glowing reviews. So take all those reviews with a grain of salt. They're easy to spot.

[QUOTE=Mongerer88;2160582]One agency we haven't mentioned in the last few pages is Xxxtase. At times, they have had as strong of a line-up as any agency in Montreal, but they seemed to have not quite gotten as good of reviews the last year or so. But they have recently added a lot of brand new, unreviewed girls who will hopefully be solid performers.

I noticed that one of their former stars, Amanda, was on the lineup today. She gets tremendous GFE reviews, minus CIM.

And Daphne is still on their website, but she doesn't work too often. But she was always their highest reviewed and most often booked lady when she worked more regularly. She was the Montreal favorite of one of the local board's most prolific reviewers, and he is very demanding regarding looks and GFE services.

So in the spirit of listing the major Montreal agencies and some of their best reviewed GFE ladies, here is Xxxtase and Amanda and Daphne.

[URL]https://montrealxxxtase.com/our-ladies/[/URL][/QUOTE]Yeah, it's fair to say Amanda and Daphne are must-see girls. Met Daphne and had a great time.

A lot of the new girls used to be at Mojo, and they seem to continue providing the same meh service that they used to provide at their previous agency. Rose is one of them and she had a terrible review not too long ago. Now there's even mention that some girls are not even GFE.

It was also posted on the local board that Martin is no longer really with the agency. Without him around, that agency never does well. It could explain why some of their stars are now at Vogue; Alexandra, Jessica, and Lia (ex-Gaby, ex-Mia at Delights. Amazing girl, not to be missed).

[QUOTE=RoyMiller;2162330]Yeah, it's fair to say Amanda and Daphne are must-see girls. Met Daphne and had a great time.

A lot of the new girls used to be at Mojo, and they seem to continue providing the same meh service that they used to provide at their previous agency. Rose is one of them and she had a terrible review not too long ago. Now there's even mention that some girls are not even GFE.

It was also posted on the local board that Martin is no longer really with the agency. Without him around, that agency never does well. It could explain why some of their stars are now at Vogue; Alexandra, Jessica, and Lia (ex-Gaby, ex-Mia at Delights. Amazing girl, not to be missed).[/QUOTE]Roy, thanks for your posts. Do you have an opinion on some of the prettiest faces? Every girl seems to have an 8. 5 or 9 face according to locals. There's a new guy prolifically posting the last several weeks in a Penthouse Letters format (some of you are old enough to remember) for which I had high hopes. I guess based on the style of the board he followed everyone with the protocol that the agency girls are all beautiful in their own way. The poor Montreal independents seem to be fair game for critiquing.

P.S. - I had a laugh when the XXXtase agency operator explained that GFE is not necessarily BBBJ because some guys are cool with CBJ. It seems that when an agency falls from the top they have to scramble with girls who are not consistently good performers making their own rules.

[QUOTE=WyattEarp;2162737]Roy, thanks for your posts. Do you have an opinion on some of the prettiest faces? Every girl seems to have an 8. 5 or 9 face according to locals.[/QUOTE]Wyatt,

You can deduct at least one point from all these ratings. 90% of the time, a girl rated as 9 or 10 is at best an 8. For example: the guy you mention, rated Sophie at Euphoria as 8.5 facially. I'd rate her as a 7. Smoking' body, great service and attitude, but she's not above 8. No way. Kinda plain looking in fact. But I've had fantastic encounters with her.

People always say looks are subjective. Sure, but few people will disagree with the idea that ratings in the range of 9 or 10 really belongs to girls who look like supermodels. Most of the Montreal SP's I've been with don't look like that at all. Pretty GND's, sure. Supermodels like most of these pussy-high reviews make them to be, no.

Girls I've met who are legitimate 8 or above in recent years are Isabella Desrosiers (retired unfortunately) and Lyaa, who worked at Angels Escorts (defunct) and briefly at GoodGirls: [URL]https://twitter.com/lyaa_xox[/URL].

More recent encounters: Shelly at XO, Scarlett at XO, for instance; these girls are no higher than high 7's. Very pretty GND's, but they're not in the fashion model territory. Mila at Euphoria is another recent encounter; she does score an 8 in my book, but she's a time-waster. Wouldn't repeat.

The point you raise about the local indies is an interesting one. I think they can be broadly be categorized in two categories: former agency girls who strike out on their own, and want to make more money; and then the girls with age / weight / looks that don't fit what the average client wants, and therefore would not be hired by agencies. One reason why they attract negative comments on the local board, is by the way many of them posts on the board or on Twitter. They always seem to have a chip on their shoulders.

[QUOTE=BourbonFan;2161984]Good catch. Creepy as hell. Looks like a surveillance app screenshot.[/QUOTE]What's worrisome is that the owner is known to keep records on well-known clients and then share this information with his buddies. He was called out last year by the boyfriend of one of his former girls on the local board for his behavior. I never thought it would get this far. Not inconceivable that he would record the sessions. If I ever do business again with XO, it will be for an outcall.